{"meta":{"query_hash":"267f88c801b7","filters":{"topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research"},"cohort_total":2100,"direct_labels_cover":193,"predictions_cover":2100,"exported":2100,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/267f88c801b7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=scientometrics+and+bibliometrics+research"},"results":[{"id":"W1480055427","doi":"10.18438/b87592","title":"Does a Social Network Based Model of Journal Metrics Improve Ranking?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Centrality; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Digital library; Social network (sociolinguistics); World Wide Web; Social network analysis; Library science; Impact factor; Information retrieval; Social media; Data science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21554354072907722,"score_gpt":0.47162825250861146,"score_spread":0.25608471177953424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480055427","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07791389,0.04801303,0.7415546,0.06298951,0.0025291624,0.000415412,0.002629276,0.0024734708,0.061481614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8199714,0.019760681,0.14615136,0.002142224,0.002726292,0.00041434,0.0015522132,0.0004198527,0.0068616467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233514,0.004414114,0.00040248287,0.0008862899,0.0017406963,0.00022132622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695105,0.019811178,0.0021899904,0.0027991806,0.005159464,0.0005296596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013236655,0.001419095,0.0018189385,0.009459557,0.0012465452,0.007629697,0.002564342,0.0023022133,0.0047468166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05770101,0.000585658,0.0017472428,0.009961514,0.001929559,0.017144669,0.0013826572,0.0019820018,0.0034824146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016437387,0.00027164907,0.031779468,0.0014640582,0.0011655347,0.00010739451,0.00091361324,0.1105486,0.0006265817,0.22680973,0.029691892,0.5964571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007712694,0.00028883448,0.01556094,0.0005602498,0.00026855353,0.00020892623,0.0005698018,0.52254784,0.0005230506,0.41855022,0.040652294,0.00019212012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011062328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011209339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99054044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003959561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002132826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07000297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480669717","doi":"10.18438/b8kp4f","title":"Peer Review of the Evidence Base","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Base (topology); Computer science; Peer review; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Information retrieval; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5430162852185466,"score_gpt":0.5381562733337029,"score_spread":0.004860011884843751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480669717","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003809937,0.13904801,0.020753702,0.21272832,0.4230443,0.038804814,0.02481721,0.0014771518,0.1355166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10235634,0.21042873,0.08065518,0.058797665,0.18933798,0.05328979,0.039554615,0.003238401,0.2623413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8617876,0.04655325,0.03352089,0.007550656,0.04813837,0.0024491881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38206616,0.058547225,0.03171795,0.04724124,0.46767578,0.012751615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078297585,0.0024245924,0.009111148,0.017111547,0.004014024,0.010801235,0.0070030564,0.010381057,0.11037059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45515496,0.0016042321,0.0055816644,0.011382607,0.0036568034,0.0072037936,0.0050540124,0.0063935346,0.060323104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010559123,0.00012066696,0.00090791774,0.07584799,0.0014657704,0.0005004021,0.0003937246,0.00015500227,0.001433916,0.0031648248,0.6874828,0.22747114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011992677,0.00017227583,0.0033951332,0.1056536,0.001881119,0.00050091854,0.00045875116,0.00067928084,0.0019520061,0.009908109,0.87403464,0.00016485366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030553304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052529406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9217024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006406531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030396257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41408217},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1488788462","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Metrics under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reputation; Audit; Documentation; Library science; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Mathematics; Accounting; Business","score_opus":0.6638953583953724,"score_gpt":0.5733188140237518,"score_spread":0.09057654437162055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488788462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00294458,0.76650715,0.03852618,0.15061362,0.010805699,0.00012110329,0.0004013715,0.00097101805,0.029109318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070487395,0.8158331,0.060047835,0.010249959,0.01908678,0.00047490164,0.00047034703,0.0009425274,0.022407155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728469,0.0135378735,0.00216299,0.0010017732,0.009903798,0.00054663094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90179956,0.069825865,0.007659569,0.003858315,0.01471667,0.0021399502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025997618,0.001585371,0.0019566715,0.022234617,0.0030289176,0.023757037,0.001895882,0.0032601864,0.0059549096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205406,0.0018407447,0.0005983268,0.035799216,0.013464722,0.03309538,0.0057730903,0.0069068335,0.004709132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036471585,0.000039372542,0.0022355132,0.0016873629,0.000054412092,0.00007535159,0.00555146,0.0006930972,0.00019712967,0.08667491,0.2894386,0.6133163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019878198,0.000083850035,0.0057010846,0.007490122,0.000042902688,0.00026595948,0.007868318,0.0018766049,0.0006101695,0.28156963,0.69430524,0.00016617197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006179414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063481038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054789656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009699151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13749021},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1491754772","doi":"10.1002/asi.23101","title":"Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":445,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Joint Information Systems Committee; Arts and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social media; Citation; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Altmetrics; Information retrieval; Biomedicine; Data science; World Wide Web; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.12889260177510845,"score_gpt":0.4927783923111769,"score_spread":0.3638857905360685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491754772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97443455,0.002968945,0.0037738846,0.0012619231,0.00013399073,0.00022673352,0.013531644,0.000110865265,0.003557495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97857213,0.0018612469,0.008453934,0.00016429683,0.00036139428,0.0004028697,0.0086983,0.000030783354,0.0014550162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975877,0.0007240939,0.0005462069,0.00020872068,0.0007606436,0.00017273231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668514,0.021999829,0.0071991715,0.0005456948,0.0026578244,0.00074596354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029491954,0.00034108933,0.00057382224,0.023402084,0.00077139755,0.0018192397,0.00036663222,0.0007319455,0.0013854125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022581339,0.00013765712,0.00060185825,0.027371943,0.00039620447,0.0015667686,0.0014717656,0.00042170752,0.00057569053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065935316,0.0002148044,0.84538513,0.0020475192,0.00055106997,0.0006861801,0.006780394,0.0013160141,0.0076841973,0.0023129368,0.004938525,0.12742376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028989098,0.000338501,0.9603036,0.00025882685,0.000328589,0.0010658322,0.008321504,0.008241543,0.0032406857,0.0033095651,0.014471098,0.000091389644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002691576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035892767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085005286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083725236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015596986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492479987","doi":"10.18438/b8qw4r","title":"Doctoral Students in New Zealand Have Low Awareness of Institutional Repository Existence, but Positive Attitudes Toward Open Access Publication of Their Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nonprobability sampling; Axial coding; Psychology; Medical education; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Sociology; Theoretical sampling; Medicine; Social science; Population","score_opus":0.4246772706305319,"score_gpt":0.5396775239440464,"score_spread":0.11500025331351454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492479987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98578423,0.0012799249,0.00026455423,0.0020346122,0.00006430863,0.000094539275,0.00025221394,0.000016596061,0.010209031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865579,0.002427258,0.0012408791,0.00068801304,0.000031101885,0.00019419556,0.0002685878,0.00001239501,0.008579801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972645,0.00046669305,0.00036906928,0.00036087085,0.0010086211,0.00053034996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909836,0.0016771047,0.0030808544,0.0002856503,0.0016248361,0.0023479539],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046777558,0.00030238184,0.00068166887,0.0015359034,0.0024989164,0.0029944698,0.0006739882,0.0007875489,0.012853893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016210528,0.00042247266,0.00048923277,0.0025906872,0.0023987074,0.0019001802,0.0026300037,0.0009547936,0.0016953981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024913682,0.00042917774,0.7148695,0.0012690724,0.00006906387,0.0017070185,0.1372152,0.00012918911,0.004531156,0.0011186855,0.006501116,0.1319117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029877756,0.00038948454,0.8166385,0.00032620347,0.000033431996,0.0014383127,0.15303876,0.000054854016,0.0005908897,0.0005183674,0.026881395,0.000059957216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074058585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1344131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00361129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007894307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14725506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496074027","doi":"10.3171/2014.12.jns142553","title":"The academic productivity and impact of the University of Toronto Neurosurgery Program as assessed by manuscripts published and their number of citations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Proxy (statistics); Citation; Scopus; Productivity; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Library science; Index (typography); MEDLINE; Science Citation Index; Demography; Medical education; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.326309038289192,"score_gpt":0.49016570291335165,"score_spread":0.16385666462415965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496074027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6049792,0.1413712,0.003117718,0.022501975,0.004177771,0.0008115594,0.11748049,0.00087136135,0.10468862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9160772,0.04678726,0.005192794,0.00056095654,0.0023725803,0.00031767003,0.016318813,0.0001712404,0.012201414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821547,0.0022612433,0.0035966395,0.0011342568,0.009853905,0.00099934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78710663,0.053888343,0.049738504,0.0061222883,0.0831148,0.020029424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01804379,0.00065125397,0.0012093022,0.037693113,0.0025267943,0.0114843715,0.0019076122,0.00066764845,0.009644167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12931074,0.00036929958,0.0012816228,0.07102039,0.0016818463,0.0029791682,0.003343201,0.0006920442,0.0025524963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074951485,0.00015207232,0.597873,0.016108666,0.0016499041,0.00081958243,0.0086549595,0.0017811334,0.0010829435,0.0045747766,0.089953184,0.27660027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006579148,0.00042494075,0.89648193,0.0042713787,0.0012915623,0.0008339224,0.0067189727,0.0012599311,0.0023938585,0.0012891467,0.08483897,0.00012956871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13635558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24849716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019798988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046836823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27112383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496956611","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a24","title":"A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Open source software; Publishing; Open source; Computer science; Open-source software development; World Wide Web; Sample (material); Political science; Software; Internet privacy; Library science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.9052581429497064,"score_gpt":0.6965406886885522,"score_spread":0.20871745426115418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496956611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98480266,0.0039985697,0.00041491952,0.0012004388,0.000037133515,0.00008854845,0.002459975,0.000038774444,0.0069589764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267156,0.0077812183,0.00116287,0.0006928874,0.00017807579,0.00013100916,0.0032827528,0.000032316642,0.00406735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874254,0.003071271,0.0027463355,0.0008680923,0.0052482057,0.0006408008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8983069,0.04049683,0.033777967,0.0026258891,0.017492462,0.0072999513],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005545048,0.00024397121,0.0006289188,0.018562524,0.0012269234,0.0039007175,0.00083721365,0.00095745036,0.004685103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04513392,0.0003089675,0.00027956362,0.032106403,0.0006802911,0.0035167735,0.0014687993,0.00052680186,0.0018681163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016524746,0.00027813547,0.892522,0.0009675163,0.00011740193,0.0005891009,0.01045567,0.000102655664,0.0024142924,0.0011222888,0.0061543845,0.085111305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017862063,0.00036766537,0.9377476,0.00021924631,0.000045944256,0.0017726567,0.014730034,0.00029547643,0.0007436184,0.00036197872,0.043657992,0.000039939492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009588741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013919604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000738265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011713677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029325366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497278741","doi":"","title":"Investissements du Canada en science et innovation : le concept actuel de la recherche et developpement est-il suffisant?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7236746860763056,"score_gpt":0.6128067089039004,"score_spread":0.11086797717240515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497278741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06034112,0.07269153,0.05546435,0.18622094,0.0015972198,0.00062440877,0.0033477906,0.0004793109,0.61923337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76991636,0.062421605,0.051009417,0.015115083,0.0006332751,0.00053615577,0.0010106999,0.00019465276,0.09916275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97738874,0.004638486,0.00069160026,0.0017127133,0.013310586,0.002257946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585945,0.015544558,0.0028441092,0.0019975859,0.018585876,0.0024333221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022898192,0.0010243518,0.0011862167,0.007614944,0.006413297,0.016344659,0.0026989896,0.0028136494,0.006941405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048569426,0.00050223974,0.0010027245,0.010564022,0.010690171,0.010113876,0.00402723,0.004103445,0.00069591356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008500553,0.00004493155,0.014485482,0.00079561997,0.00009662926,0.00014455667,0.003269713,0.0021515898,0.00028573253,0.83968663,0.019199135,0.11975498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008671044,0.00017686667,0.047502913,0.004821084,0.0003240251,0.00023668549,0.00996449,0.008093918,0.0019873937,0.28406695,0.6424727,0.00026625354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9196339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92344505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09281975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18586001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67345756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497360613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.244854","title":"Citation Patterns in the Finance Literature","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Business; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.21028003995618805,"score_gpt":0.49709138484603327,"score_spread":0.2868113448898452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497360613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97396606,0.0050682765,0.00046317014,0.0029138653,0.000054087388,0.000010175481,0.0020717105,0.000036672332,0.015415942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937755,0.0019366548,0.00036774442,0.00008578333,0.0001303335,0.000009157004,0.0010213369,0.000016454978,0.0026570468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984591,0.00034108575,0.00026946128,0.00016247845,0.00056305464,0.00020474936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97063005,0.014276523,0.006620055,0.00094408815,0.006251165,0.0012782383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019372838,0.00012673426,0.000376862,0.027138824,0.00097319786,0.003709032,0.00052671524,0.0008727467,0.005960464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033642173,0.00014072869,0.00026691623,0.03863754,0.000885999,0.0030936012,0.0012291231,0.00044945595,0.0012868127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040208502,0.00009729789,0.82005286,0.00033038418,0.00018377235,0.00035465098,0.0046701343,0.0013469375,0.0014747898,0.031908084,0.008321258,0.13085783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026720145,0.00005680598,0.9540188,0.0001578722,0.000076618955,0.00043657765,0.003984032,0.0026940862,0.0006352386,0.017323995,0.020562481,0.00002682104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074078855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124881705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99806273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014733787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001215602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01993972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500384936","doi":"10.18438/b83g6s","title":"Level 1 COUNTER Compliant Vendor Statistics are a Reliable Measure of Journal Usage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Vendor; Electronic journal; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Computer science; Chemistry; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.42501520806941745,"score_gpt":0.4965367225650929,"score_spread":0.07152151449567545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500384936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63639224,0.010600432,0.089687854,0.012001718,0.0017377282,0.0015353082,0.062746726,0.0030704818,0.18222748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92845327,0.0022399293,0.039657135,0.0024251004,0.0007970027,0.0014500897,0.013233194,0.0006005321,0.011143775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92607653,0.020135073,0.011692811,0.004466224,0.036210682,0.0014187418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4840617,0.23616113,0.13112628,0.052037336,0.09396447,0.0026491513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04076994,0.0007271605,0.0013116547,0.0117077315,0.0011797952,0.0055526574,0.0020566874,0.0015133944,0.011815025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27678776,0.0005544778,0.0012505864,0.020782989,0.0016960534,0.0070935534,0.0020072116,0.0012442648,0.0064449967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000354466,0.0001739593,0.77140415,0.0011514567,0.00037105195,0.00008466416,0.0013390171,0.0005709119,0.0006994806,0.009699031,0.036083326,0.1780685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006734793,0.00063351844,0.8631828,0.0010022302,0.00031283905,0.0005931368,0.0015515601,0.0038395992,0.004145379,0.013873857,0.11060666,0.00019115837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002436078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028996153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002041183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027170056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21561462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500417170","doi":"10.1002/bult.2014.1720400310","title":"ASIS&amp;T annual meeting pre‐conference activities: Full room for the third SIG/MET workshop","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation; Scientometrics; Context (archaeology); Session (web analytics); Webometrics; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.1441817719441936,"score_gpt":0.4341499481024922,"score_spread":0.2899681761582986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500417170","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009979935,0.008973106,0.0078435,0.19882606,0.5116978,0.0013106753,0.0060408474,0.0027000061,0.25262812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024016073,0.005160779,0.007150745,0.016866377,0.08428317,0.0012237391,0.0049717347,0.001560387,0.8547669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960812,0.0005847031,0.00023264127,0.00045328945,0.001956895,0.00069141854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846631,0.000912306,0.0005414193,0.0005829786,0.00783192,0.005468368],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010617501,0.0020530391,0.0013296328,0.0025371488,0.0038406479,0.015546473,0.0018731545,0.0044491757,0.15486121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008548735,0.0006075236,0.0017984281,0.0015118307,0.0010484738,0.0034755212,0.0043587885,0.006016106,0.113879845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013949035,0.000085725595,0.00022741628,0.00007306635,0.0000071362165,0.00007507336,0.00003922304,0.000070953065,0.00030638327,0.0005509009,0.98112017,0.017304532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034564368,0.000101612604,0.0011084551,0.000086806685,0.000009964425,0.00003457261,0.00027665432,0.00028264782,0.00039972068,0.00060901494,0.99703634,0.000019596553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058115125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015133734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99746287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037388199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007633185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51806235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501080678","doi":"","title":"Impact of Publishers’ Policy on Electronic Thesis and Dissertation (ETD) Distribution Options within the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Texas at El Paso; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Health Science Center, University of Tennessee; Rhodes University; University of the Sciences; Universidad del Atlántico; College of Computing; Marquette University; University of Toledo; Hawai'i Pacific University; University of South Alabama; University of Oregon; Pepperdine University; Kent State University; University of Southern Maine; Old Dominion University; Nova Southeastern University; University of West Florida; University of the Pacific; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Northwestern University; Northern Arizona University; University of North Texas; New Mexico State University; University of Miami; Oregon State University; University of Texas at Arlington; University of South Carolina; Florida Atlantic University; Indiana Wesleyan University; Georgia State University; Montana State University; University of Notre Dame; Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; University of Wyoming; Georgetown University; University of Southern California; University of Oklahoma; Morgan State University; University of Texas at San Antonio; Portland State University; University of West Georgia; University of Pittsburgh; Florida State University; Indiana State University; North Carolina State University; University of Washington; Iowa State University; Villanova University; University of Northern Colorado; Oklahoma State University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Georgia Institute of Technology; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; University of South Dakota; North Dakota State University; Georgia Southern University; Directorate for Biological Sciences; University of South Florida; Florida International University; Utah State University; Michigan Technological University; Vanderbilt University; Purdue University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; York University; George Mason University; University of Southern Mississippi","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Business; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0584179079290481,"score_gpt":0.3823540805339383,"score_spread":0.3239361726048902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501080678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871104,0.003963381,0.00094858254,0.10620083,0.00093716034,0.000100177625,0.0018975252,0.00017220346,0.19866984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708124,0.0006630632,0.00033813625,0.010885109,0.0005261652,0.00005714441,0.00033561364,0.000049710034,0.016332747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768635,0.009087839,0.0018384991,0.0023168619,0.005263326,0.0046299207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83059907,0.1287679,0.014168851,0.0029862705,0.011694693,0.01178319],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024906797,0.00028396267,0.0007821337,0.0038492717,0.003761774,0.021990066,0.0021887065,0.0065974393,0.02093452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089021556,0.00069385336,0.0009835135,0.0051803687,0.0035948267,0.0056747086,0.0037768593,0.0050188825,0.0015817191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006609994,0.0028936332,0.29385218,0.0005683617,0.0004322551,0.0022560153,0.0069879126,0.014444088,0.004489939,0.41434923,0.116069205,0.13704716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019436537,0.0015567851,0.55537724,0.0010062006,0.0010196656,0.0010914193,0.029077996,0.017682763,0.011600714,0.08181332,0.29730374,0.0005264299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04222251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059685536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97800994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011454626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011894286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13172132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509195019","doi":"10.18438/b8cs37","title":"Use Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science for Comprehensive Citation Tracking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Web of science; Citation analysis; Sample size determination; Impact factor; Stratified sampling; Sample (material); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Statistics; Meta-analysis; Physics; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.4677110181043493,"score_gpt":0.525365212743652,"score_spread":0.057654194639302714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509195019","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008451122,0.007261377,0.009712554,0.0057186116,0.0017254276,0.009678361,0.8394973,0.02407376,0.093881406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038059715,0.020767646,0.15748377,0.0028346088,0.0016292862,0.034156483,0.67095745,0.011535601,0.06257545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97902167,0.001783378,0.007836192,0.001738031,0.008512014,0.0011087415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86293614,0.0259911,0.02731979,0.011121277,0.06732181,0.00530984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0193036,0.0035025263,0.0046086377,0.1337466,0.0019774286,0.008326458,0.0031664786,0.002309017,0.1308713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114231095,0.0012056936,0.0025498148,0.14600156,0.00069620414,0.011211089,0.006658721,0.001835762,0.084860526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044385545,0.00018541906,0.008846786,0.03476675,0.00047686425,0.00063687435,0.0007599061,0.0005264466,0.0012477859,0.0059074513,0.58255583,0.36364606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042295572,0.00023956268,0.041978635,0.011657847,0.0006678093,0.00044145645,0.0009210215,0.0016276581,0.002447334,0.010177643,0.928987,0.00043098466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015057827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014639711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029235485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022420967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4378081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509207465","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.476","title":"A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Digital humanities; Humanism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Political science; Social science; Art; History; Law","score_opus":0.57150650394932,"score_gpt":0.571475474680813,"score_spread":0.000031029268507065666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509207465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17970553,0.1867622,0.0042559286,0.14870022,0.0012016539,0.000067389476,0.00014544568,0.00006284488,0.47909874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583567,0.028721798,0.0012591113,0.0030405195,0.0007166784,0.00003281166,0.00004151051,0.00002472282,0.0078062024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891515,0.006013546,0.00036705332,0.00066580484,0.0027466377,0.0010555154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747099,0.017164964,0.0026808723,0.001215498,0.0014900534,0.002738744],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01054191,0.00031406374,0.0007150072,0.009643161,0.014997093,0.023680402,0.0013692315,0.0028940674,0.0074301343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025014982,0.00023636465,0.00029369188,0.021700911,0.07827727,0.019766668,0.008393568,0.00356258,0.00035684253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041564777,0.000037631777,0.0059871725,0.0002142151,0.00001180285,0.0003008321,0.060483523,0.00013819098,0.00006251328,0.8742729,0.0046395604,0.05381013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017642702,0.000048446942,0.018915722,0.0018597463,0.000030610932,0.0005913044,0.15266122,0.00041302812,0.0001928047,0.58700037,0.23819758,0.00007156486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08550818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13438247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99863076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02549684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020511016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18499339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510487290","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10031937","title":"Long-Term Patterns in the Aging of the Scientific Literature, 1900–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Phenomenon; Scientific literature; Term (time); Period (music); Demography; History; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Biology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.43267262378551335,"score_gpt":0.5565941038788597,"score_spread":0.1239214800933463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510487290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606622,0.020914722,0.00044975473,0.001933424,0.00011176356,0.000021891708,0.006951776,0.000050883733,0.008903553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842569,0.005972071,0.0003170503,0.00018393072,0.00027286596,0.000020580559,0.0057255793,0.000015642716,0.003235295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886346,0.00012171657,0.00024729603,0.000242892,0.00036631047,0.0001583277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97097385,0.0047643734,0.011226729,0.001178336,0.010162645,0.001694047],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031642069,0.00015032411,0.00040994148,0.008119262,0.0006085409,0.0019946718,0.0006346485,0.000706347,0.0022783428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020197999,0.00016905641,0.00028672995,0.011943028,0.00059828575,0.0021914283,0.0011327923,0.00068757136,0.0010630074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000640337,0.000104839244,0.85813457,0.0007612731,0.0002449101,0.0004716988,0.0078681605,0.00070497626,0.0017224556,0.0037382264,0.007537352,0.11807125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003423768,0.00004347904,0.98800045,0.00004860036,0.000023744615,0.00017468863,0.0006040394,0.00010347529,0.0002185387,0.00021193498,0.010557109,0.000010457654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013035721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013873816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017469657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009074338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025919676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512796984","doi":"10.3386/w19538","title":"Credit History: The Changing Nature of Scientific Credit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Credit history; Financial system; Economics","score_opus":0.8350192033811803,"score_gpt":0.655006246116735,"score_spread":0.18001295726444533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512796984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27213758,0.017875617,0.15328625,0.10629075,0.0016759125,0.00015823814,0.0009579431,0.00027712618,0.44734055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97350806,0.003959541,0.0051867813,0.0014271813,0.00097653124,0.000051571278,0.0001443029,0.00007336903,0.014672703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994041,0.0021320605,0.00031642985,0.0009230233,0.0019588482,0.00062852516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544989,0.021475026,0.007929409,0.004528409,0.006176917,0.0053912727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00969345,0.00027479217,0.00057783996,0.004512105,0.0033066894,0.010938725,0.0016948082,0.0032456657,0.013077234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05886408,0.00044728775,0.00039615858,0.008246734,0.010573875,0.016166352,0.0032864425,0.0038942993,0.0012102316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011152937,0.000060746053,0.015003783,0.00010756898,0.000026023552,0.00014801178,0.0018125395,0.005419379,0.0005166783,0.9046029,0.0049309838,0.06725988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049635517,0.000041988584,0.014573159,0.00017210098,0.000015871727,0.000109615336,0.00085341115,0.0042892303,0.00040286043,0.9153484,0.06409032,0.000053358854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062986403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004523804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99548787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008621342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004692362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06255245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513702849","doi":"10.18438/b8rc71","title":"The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Government (linguistics); Library science; Citation; Citation analysis; Health care; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4657287888165873,"score_gpt":0.5367322101662652,"score_spread":0.07100342134967785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513702849","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058243442,0.4017376,0.0041979128,0.20931672,0.005328577,0.0004504214,0.020863252,0.00035987626,0.2995022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6159989,0.28796175,0.01839038,0.024463516,0.0031635805,0.0003858178,0.010511788,0.00041926405,0.038704995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89924145,0.01426419,0.006182759,0.005309203,0.07046592,0.0045365146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5642468,0.11790454,0.026357334,0.021954086,0.26039812,0.009139214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05516212,0.0007025255,0.0015222194,0.04177141,0.01232192,0.03158092,0.0035514121,0.0022312636,0.012733733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26616022,0.00063399767,0.0010001189,0.079735085,0.013660041,0.012832692,0.004629263,0.0017730513,0.0027328713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020319247,0.00007723143,0.048717115,0.0091843745,0.00030389102,0.00020858832,0.017214075,0.0004105431,0.0006965521,0.09660654,0.14511885,0.6812591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031392145,0.00009783964,0.13035254,0.01468026,0.0003107559,0.00031061927,0.032660875,0.0002387602,0.0015976729,0.011079033,0.80839485,0.00024549826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85356474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8905602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10263775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16732195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7446925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516312676","doi":"","title":"Highly Cited Canada Articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Library science; Index (typography); Web of science; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Institution; Multidisciplinary approach; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.400457680858481,"score_gpt":0.5049024716013509,"score_spread":0.10444479074286994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516312676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79062897,0.012519256,0.0037020126,0.0012272605,0.00015668894,0.0006340585,0.122371055,0.0005228135,0.06823786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401237,0.007177706,0.0052588345,0.000121159785,0.00014082044,0.0003529209,0.037650242,0.00011374063,0.0090608895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203146,0.0003068289,0.00046848712,0.00044449497,0.0061480952,0.00060065364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98259073,0.0024291186,0.0021679238,0.00037129218,0.011506972,0.0009339106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003120513,0.00059478683,0.0013980224,0.063643575,0.0024436703,0.004998619,0.00093045126,0.00040714885,0.003980415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020461282,0.00019565903,0.0010312359,0.15787913,0.0007485125,0.0012258114,0.001849247,0.00045305138,0.0007919166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035144095,0.00011175243,0.78166294,0.0023922382,0.001274973,0.000575055,0.004784508,0.002953255,0.0014519411,0.006791593,0.036009766,0.16164052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230118,0.000037529968,0.94882005,0.00019746384,0.0004327551,0.0002177526,0.0024542932,0.004214898,0.0007456409,0.00073043135,0.042058833,0.00006812281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83599573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8386743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99687946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020071225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035657927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3299402},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1516388499","doi":"10.1108/02640470710729083","title":"Federal Science eLibrary Pilot","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Originality; Alliance; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3907233330194798,"score_gpt":0.5276591830770152,"score_spread":0.1369358500575354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516388499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864146,0.00045556604,0.010162693,0.006832748,0.000377195,0.034879826,0.019160604,0.0035845882,0.13813207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112437,0.0006396309,0.045356516,0.0037172267,0.00013399606,0.025915015,0.016895501,0.0004352757,0.09566308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190885,0.0015789724,0.0002097811,0.00069209846,0.003101295,0.0025089714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477937,0.002583919,0.000723382,0.0028171588,0.0122803245,0.006815896],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008423745,0.00059085316,0.0005196993,0.0017102682,0.0064381724,0.002522157,0.0031846245,0.0011429458,0.023570767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01302261,0.0006092054,0.0005550748,0.0032901403,0.0019785292,0.0013677744,0.003951323,0.0015127799,0.0046706437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014377607,0.021143693,0.103668235,0.0012586914,0.000164891,0.0027773713,0.019869717,0.004001103,0.026678516,0.021244917,0.23549676,0.54931843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00414732,0.013492206,0.28386328,0.00031518968,0.0002063527,0.00067185465,0.029876705,0.0054797693,0.027538704,0.0033618435,0.63076913,0.0002776493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69321376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.724816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022511352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0961406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61718595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516942684","doi":"","title":"Quantity versus Quality: What’s in a (Journal) Name?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Statistics; Quality (philosophy); Rank (graph theory); Bathtub; Econometrics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Geography; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.7144364333315639,"score_gpt":0.5995644660464967,"score_spread":0.11487196728506721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516942684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566458,0.0071026436,0.0077562714,0.011364474,0.0005153425,0.000050068964,0.0019606822,0.00011869606,0.0144859385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560237,0.00065436715,0.0011733752,0.00042188924,0.00059163506,0.00001796414,0.00040786143,0.000046669076,0.0010837907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897741,0.0031612127,0.0011493975,0.0014406621,0.0037522286,0.0007224927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7873512,0.12185058,0.06586613,0.0061333966,0.010535138,0.0082634995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010947453,0.00039383792,0.0013833625,0.0073771793,0.0015465572,0.0074741193,0.0011287283,0.0021027406,0.008016657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10509321,0.00028305475,0.0010949993,0.019650383,0.0048065605,0.008919503,0.0026813594,0.0023086215,0.0018199587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090370595,0.00026419453,0.94249916,0.00054746005,0.0009084637,0.0003796659,0.0024495572,0.001462825,0.0020758116,0.010409755,0.003031316,0.03506805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101701386,0.0009845947,0.941066,0.00024000634,0.0005199392,0.00091275934,0.004620754,0.0048898743,0.0015264413,0.034751102,0.0102004595,0.00018633514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040245648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004442654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018674717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010616416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057896376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520949446","doi":"10.18438/b8z327","title":"Google Scholar Retrieves Twice as Many Relevant Citations as PubMed and Provides Greater Full-Text Access for Quick, Clinical Nephrology Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Citation; Medicine; Recall; Information retrieval; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.381617408746652,"score_gpt":0.5226569759167576,"score_spread":0.14103956717010563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520949446","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013134003,0.2383994,0.012470693,0.037334934,0.013110903,0.026201464,0.51156354,0.012443435,0.13534163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050679635,0.34738067,0.19784966,0.01639739,0.009773134,0.05196228,0.27391553,0.0076605724,0.04438116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670779,0.0074805883,0.014823746,0.00171986,0.0077014556,0.001196328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8737342,0.051154595,0.021831568,0.005967362,0.042456217,0.004856099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027608007,0.0036487752,0.015494482,0.22693351,0.0024284327,0.01091951,0.004665975,0.004145718,0.1396967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1315794,0.0024683222,0.0068824445,0.14727604,0.0016785014,0.012407607,0.009076945,0.0027516466,0.050749686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048622864,0.00012100724,0.0029570737,0.33919325,0.002564746,0.0010903217,0.0014915122,0.00020954097,0.0021112442,0.0040189223,0.46052074,0.18523549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073885097,0.00021318291,0.012164661,0.10915331,0.0027731655,0.0015201144,0.00218923,0.00036784852,0.00094347156,0.006422408,0.86315924,0.00035450625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006262085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016996859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97239196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037482667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025948377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.467332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521319765","doi":"10.1108/00012530910989607","title":"Institutional repositories in Canadian post‐secondary institutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; World Wide Web; Computer science; Originality; Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Interface (matter); Value (mathematics); User interface; Heading (navigation); Knowledge organization; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.35822892393573014,"score_gpt":0.5153858212926363,"score_spread":0.1571568973569062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521319765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87202525,0.0033498523,0.0018155256,0.0030638562,0.000066296656,0.00052743685,0.005607024,0.0006701519,0.11287459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97720987,0.001880557,0.0029715488,0.00028443374,0.00001473462,0.000100163124,0.0018530507,0.00006240391,0.015623267],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302715,0.0010493832,0.00037849703,0.00043764687,0.0033923776,0.0017150023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97342753,0.0040006377,0.004124035,0.0014071083,0.012970154,0.004070492],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050728866,0.00038511836,0.00058109604,0.015162182,0.00992095,0.010441243,0.0016342555,0.0005614873,0.0122370375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021881783,0.0003314416,0.0004365328,0.037832074,0.0029895923,0.002381495,0.004814907,0.0005130808,0.0010159861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062685605,0.00021542807,0.37910452,0.0020907423,0.00010195057,0.0012742492,0.098546825,0.0010852608,0.0022070995,0.04332297,0.04495061,0.42647362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004568931,0.0001420524,0.56458074,0.0009751679,0.00013231185,0.0007945623,0.12542084,0.0013532449,0.0027727184,0.0022888284,0.30129912,0.00019469776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9561438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99836576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06185362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10290338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4487815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521812281","doi":"","title":"Writing for Conferences: A Handbook for Graduate Students and Faculty by Leo Mallette and Clare Berger (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6982719281394875,"score_gpt":0.571062810058546,"score_spread":0.12720911808094149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521812281","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029381932,0.85491306,0.008796091,0.09294618,0.033514928,0.000703637,0.0009773567,0.00079025165,0.007064688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024966225,0.8765137,0.039381377,0.031230738,0.02052882,0.003052605,0.0016306712,0.00050783047,0.024657577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854812,0.005416885,0.0031036963,0.000595089,0.004960464,0.00044272636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411128,0.028569156,0.0057289316,0.0016014928,0.01863308,0.004354554],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021683289,0.002164364,0.0032437088,0.012803747,0.0017456341,0.0063446155,0.003395268,0.004100599,0.010462776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05442698,0.0018453501,0.0013636189,0.011018231,0.0023648466,0.0066336454,0.0042392416,0.0075374288,0.015737634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002157127,0.000031608713,0.000084735286,0.0021685034,0.00002024324,0.000034542365,0.00022387585,0.00006724062,0.00015814549,0.0005107412,0.73783356,0.2588454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002766765,0.000044526023,0.0005781656,0.005169949,0.00003808952,0.00022343989,0.00024968633,0.000047016387,0.00011891363,0.001354699,0.99211216,0.000035723526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068763397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021574223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003417289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019928748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114673555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522204259","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a106","title":"China’s Scientific Journals in a Transforming Period: Present Situation and Developing Strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Scientific publishing; Period (music); Digital transformation; Public relations; Business; Regional science; Sociology","score_opus":0.6500827458347428,"score_gpt":0.6006074012232214,"score_spread":0.049475344611521366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522204259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69911754,0.039379343,0.0016031108,0.20099777,0.00093340327,0.00028316013,0.0006002806,0.00034504864,0.056740377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694034,0.015063605,0.002200302,0.004926849,0.00069845445,0.0000957018,0.0003797898,0.000014615171,0.0072174678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978771,0.00044494568,0.00020260179,0.00019025763,0.00054504134,0.00074002927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924223,0.0014247339,0.0011462981,0.0002085449,0.0014601377,0.003338082],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046173455,0.0005809474,0.0006409987,0.0062764445,0.0045770523,0.008520599,0.00164439,0.0022638836,0.006344156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060442034,0.0002641318,0.0005082951,0.00977627,0.0023024434,0.0061227866,0.0031188962,0.0012422127,0.0006592608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053941057,0.00048220015,0.24681176,0.0028340071,0.00019368251,0.0069171223,0.032088555,0.0019603577,0.007578014,0.19676596,0.05357331,0.45025563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002455574,0.000705234,0.40966988,0.0012883614,0.00024898993,0.00226579,0.06982166,0.0051590432,0.004200463,0.04158106,0.46455762,0.0002562866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03808964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024741165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010608149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045923676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076967895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523857352","doi":"10.1126/science.315.5820.1779a","title":"Canadian Institutes Get Windfall Without the Bother of Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Windfall gain; Economics; Business; Biology; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.40063954595579027,"score_gpt":0.5529326283435347,"score_spread":0.15229308238774447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523857352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015829535,0.007238504,0.0011286726,0.78409034,0.025038691,0.00011123294,0.0042538503,0.0008862527,0.17566952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0467537,0.0123568745,0.007202026,0.4552218,0.005092547,0.00019298367,0.007059719,0.0011275273,0.4649927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96073747,0.002664455,0.0009012721,0.0022428436,0.024778273,0.008675727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9165616,0.003518839,0.0011546552,0.0038969466,0.041640714,0.03322714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015691368,0.0012303296,0.0020133837,0.0034845036,0.014497869,0.018500688,0.0034271928,0.012356073,0.10825614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04976364,0.0009965255,0.0016258585,0.0060095177,0.0064996923,0.007512124,0.009112117,0.0119929,0.029244332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022374166,0.000008514025,0.0002450854,0.00004937915,0.000010426509,0.000033021024,0.00007689862,0.000032113705,0.000069464375,0.014651874,0.97501457,0.009786196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002714871,0.000010029727,0.0011182467,0.00015518464,0.000011332073,0.000022275955,0.0003130714,0.00005747892,0.000061297775,0.004313294,0.9938764,0.000034307795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87816787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98430866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06135584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2687388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44516987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524539223","doi":"10.1684/vir.2013.0478","title":"A map of science based on the articles submission flows.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.5654763445074102,"score_gpt":0.48755798796527317,"score_spread":0.07791835654213708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524539223","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008106211,0.011267881,0.007633684,0.0033962252,0.0017676422,0.0005749094,0.85677356,0.00682367,0.10365627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08900229,0.034598034,0.10201427,0.0006345175,0.0013703853,0.0025608027,0.7128038,0.002264499,0.0547513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834645,0.00021131906,0.00026165767,0.00033333476,0.00064428797,0.0002029135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856221,0.005311867,0.002107211,0.0005889952,0.00553328,0.0008365291],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017970727,0.0016191654,0.0010179883,0.061769772,0.0014316692,0.006963268,0.00090237707,0.0011770889,0.12705518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01795372,0.00057784637,0.0015792301,0.08891256,0.00053080794,0.0046631945,0.0024440505,0.0013666376,0.04476212],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058807316,0.0000964742,0.012846993,0.014218521,0.00034092937,0.0004898491,0.0020464133,0.0023381484,0.0025144946,0.03821309,0.5890477,0.3372593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049284416,0.00005329343,0.016887361,0.0012908892,0.00011533501,0.00020739128,0.0008114816,0.0007912464,0.00048527276,0.010721558,0.9685434,0.000043520064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016033841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014089861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019857755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007773549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4250419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525080406","doi":"","title":"A bibliometric analysis of the Canadian Journal of Communication and Communication's Methodological Evolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Razón y Palabra","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific communication; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.622874245565931,"score_gpt":0.5731120051965494,"score_spread":0.049762240369381594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525080406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7032009,0.05686332,0.011817426,0.036536198,0.002034475,0.00080877845,0.016362986,0.0005469385,0.17182894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96459574,0.011124541,0.011523479,0.00063621975,0.00048915285,0.00017102063,0.0043203607,0.000100435886,0.0070389844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772753,0.0027612725,0.0015321126,0.0014477604,0.015603816,0.0013797339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919139,0.02029152,0.0067228847,0.0025912912,0.07527497,0.0032055196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018063994,0.0005987124,0.001039934,0.11088511,0.007104638,0.010467772,0.0019100014,0.0010214361,0.003214835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09539069,0.00037975653,0.0010555875,0.16319641,0.002442586,0.002770822,0.002659468,0.000952532,0.00046453925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000247022,0.00018089621,0.37567472,0.0022903446,0.0008954632,0.00036949487,0.01161587,0.0017341963,0.0027356253,0.056950424,0.043104336,0.5042016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026764788,0.00005296215,0.9059613,0.00064732257,0.00043465194,0.00021882284,0.006183768,0.0024665147,0.0012460477,0.0035445583,0.07910222,0.0001150139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8212142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84126997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04864412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11665926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35967737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525626892","doi":"10.18438/b8j02g","title":"Awareness of Open Access Issues Differs among Faculty at Institutions of Different Sizes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Liberal arts education; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Public relations; Medicine; Higher education; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5269235616537716,"score_gpt":0.5847103699454687,"score_spread":0.05778680829169702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525626892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97336143,0.0016330483,0.0007475068,0.010210248,0.00009167073,0.00004459378,0.00013719409,0.00004375796,0.013730542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958956,0.0009369429,0.00026512696,0.001364833,0.00007898395,0.000019634708,0.00007132359,0.000017312901,0.0013503119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727465,0.0037415829,0.0016145705,0.0010177725,0.004553239,0.0017980898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9061634,0.03628795,0.028816642,0.0041478155,0.009026753,0.015557522],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012823713,0.0001499988,0.00038152622,0.0032976014,0.003750447,0.0072527183,0.0010161172,0.001566078,0.01084007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073617466,0.0004400092,0.0004964704,0.0036502904,0.0036367367,0.007882238,0.005672105,0.001556837,0.0010292958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001564867,0.00028566277,0.77867407,0.00045090885,0.000100452016,0.0005052423,0.102750316,0.00011116142,0.0017433676,0.003254331,0.007491667,0.10447638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020342351,0.0004050623,0.696467,0.0005233791,0.000054070562,0.001024814,0.2697444,0.0002234357,0.0007837782,0.0023975438,0.028237328,0.00011887058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005292026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00863554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99898386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025448145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041426793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06781912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529017456","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a25","title":"The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in Computer Science and Engineering","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Scholarly communication; Computer science; Scientific communication; Engineering ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Science communication; Science and engineering; Library science; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Science education","score_opus":0.35025389298133985,"score_gpt":0.5242150292590216,"score_spread":0.17396113627768178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529017456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39167747,0.084976934,0.021829976,0.09776592,0.021005373,0.0011640538,0.0057335133,0.001952605,0.37389424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299549,0.02081773,0.0070887026,0.003990119,0.013345413,0.0009088014,0.0012416744,0.00071201124,0.021940576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.81376976,0.09852952,0.0166008,0.007433712,0.058631964,0.0050341967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16716568,0.6874837,0.04746069,0.02544759,0.059111483,0.013330815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.092384644,0.0008825332,0.0015935936,0.015091938,0.005962332,0.019556338,0.0034858303,0.0034458095,0.029901747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55012035,0.0006792736,0.0017135058,0.02904328,0.004119756,0.013705996,0.008499488,0.0062235864,0.0066899224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029364892,0.0011262549,0.12615304,0.009058265,0.0017790055,0.0013552825,0.016549192,0.006666193,0.0020692095,0.08667073,0.124678396,0.62095803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011549661,0.0025193214,0.4154845,0.0057503306,0.0024876466,0.0048230826,0.023932891,0.008274414,0.008916026,0.08287111,0.44295624,0.00082949165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024469716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023220775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98490804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065485896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007495834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48858255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529286388","doi":"","title":"Ottawa University’s Research Retreat","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NASPA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.8929882446635876,"score_gpt":0.6565624647328274,"score_spread":0.2364257799307602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529286388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013138819,0.021052955,0.0010188584,0.5590426,0.11947542,0.0006469245,0.013752922,0.0020113133,0.26986024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015677432,0.0027564135,0.0011245168,0.0229348,0.003077665,0.00011209828,0.0017261545,0.0003109224,0.95228004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755763,0.0010990545,0.0017423448,0.001756867,0.015736166,0.0040892153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94624376,0.0042469134,0.0010827634,0.0048976094,0.024434019,0.019094914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01185931,0.0012914201,0.001865331,0.007185816,0.013808813,0.018984031,0.0041699456,0.015068196,0.11235079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035968553,0.0013164179,0.0022714313,0.0048476933,0.0045361253,0.0044214185,0.005727821,0.010079124,0.040540617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012654788,0.000052228435,0.001076095,0.0001245453,0.000030901447,0.0003421245,0.00018911064,0.00010406973,0.000293399,0.005250226,0.97076976,0.021640895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003358298,0.000030671727,0.004793033,0.00008604773,0.000018165083,0.000060178336,0.00022916842,0.00009878215,0.0003162823,0.0005344283,0.99375653,0.000043155836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57818943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83055264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57818943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047756165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16211915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530517025","doi":"10.1002/asi.23027","title":"The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Webometrics; Bibliographic coupling; Knowledge base; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Front (military); Web of science; Data science; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Information science; Period (music); Network analysis; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Physics","score_opus":0.23216091820544282,"score_gpt":0.5205154533318411,"score_spread":0.2883545351263983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530517025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598074,0.0013835935,0.0015913722,0.0007622348,0.000043935757,0.000061768675,0.0045775543,0.00006080912,0.03171127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988801,0.0007229256,0.0014504625,0.00009142262,0.00009624691,0.00005568671,0.006134439,0.000049211165,0.0025984796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450475,0.0006569278,0.0006531834,0.00047630965,0.0030332007,0.0006755475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157737,0.033557378,0.01957822,0.0033491454,0.022595277,0.0051463065],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006923731,0.00030000252,0.0007647204,0.052488573,0.0016204317,0.0072158384,0.000766119,0.0007138943,0.0055143684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043601934,0.00024272852,0.000837502,0.053266738,0.0011137304,0.0051095583,0.004754812,0.0012686236,0.001569449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048291276,0.00018019817,0.9121295,0.00050414354,0.00031191923,0.00029653157,0.01239057,0.0012554446,0.0015142787,0.009779553,0.004435233,0.056719657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012512705,0.00007132629,0.97657144,0.00012014002,0.00010523544,0.00015945546,0.006100917,0.0017996848,0.0006602032,0.0015215115,0.012849397,0.000028240931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024945587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019885993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94751143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004140013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035523826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04960078},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1531725100","doi":"10.7202/038710ar","title":"La production des revues économiques francophones","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5022795717072314,"score_gpt":0.5064498026908933,"score_spread":0.004170230983661982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531725100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48846802,0.24179654,0.003089473,0.01792291,0.0026998036,0.00022368373,0.03106473,0.00065776386,0.21407712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014105,0.098901935,0.0037855909,0.001881295,0.0023608769,0.00022803596,0.013747437,0.0004576703,0.077226676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876416,0.0018939209,0.0012330569,0.0017206835,0.006248879,0.001261885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93806535,0.024159739,0.010326397,0.0027576147,0.02175153,0.0029394913],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009799314,0.0010920339,0.0011710916,0.028891409,0.0020647242,0.007259935,0.0007739404,0.001143161,0.023905402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033673324,0.00046286843,0.001250687,0.036948115,0.0013558883,0.0027076143,0.0018562416,0.0009210711,0.0051735174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010369289,0.00014694358,0.2442582,0.010557728,0.001166718,0.0028166764,0.017313508,0.0014067481,0.0117840385,0.023331236,0.088739865,0.59744143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003363681,0.0001357438,0.40325674,0.0018518209,0.00028257977,0.00100729,0.007203891,0.0002459371,0.0024376689,0.0007589406,0.58271223,0.00007353579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08707977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07886024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009569042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007183486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17314583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533022716","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/3dq5j","title":"How pre-publication journal peer review (re)produces ignorance at scientific and medical journals: a case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; University of Chicago; Princeton University","keywords":"Ignorance; Judgement; Construct (python library); Originality; Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7933235383128203,"score_gpt":0.6568485479612578,"score_spread":0.13647499035156252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533022716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052483,0.0026378362,0.011986581,0.016149756,0.00025617465,0.0006388406,0.000066014334,0.00009925967,0.0629172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861537,0.0010743203,0.004738867,0.0008253108,0.00016310607,0.00021116051,0.000026671521,0.000061417995,0.006745438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92289346,0.059689652,0.002246107,0.0023766349,0.009650293,0.0031437753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7913501,0.16449776,0.015617978,0.012403334,0.010844499,0.0052863085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04585746,0.00051073136,0.0007385982,0.003498759,0.016248312,0.011229801,0.0030521832,0.0056097037,0.003567028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115595475,0.0007424856,0.0008255533,0.0037669074,0.017324058,0.00852785,0.008369765,0.004548512,0.0008400461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021627477,0.0004976035,0.020397678,0.0008098668,0.000060941704,0.0354183,0.8164723,0.0012836613,0.0024030255,0.07507345,0.00594965,0.041417226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015060318,0.0008665648,0.015335375,0.0016614917,0.00013277838,0.025752211,0.69694793,0.003818318,0.0075086863,0.030463481,0.21711047,0.00025212727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005706854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054021506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008180563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00793362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24252033},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1538407099","doi":"10.3386/w18494","title":"Words in Patents: Research Inputs and the Value of Innovativeness in Invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.9425202320059478,"score_gpt":0.7325894461411707,"score_spread":0.2099307858647771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538407099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90327924,0.007347334,0.01730594,0.0049715545,0.00015275467,0.00011770996,0.003340025,0.000126317,0.06335903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938081,0.0012685856,0.0026735049,0.000087867746,0.00014605258,0.000054607153,0.0006206459,0.000017187573,0.0013233017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972178,0.0007164037,0.00034777413,0.00025974223,0.0012195715,0.00023880089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92686117,0.05638635,0.01147391,0.0013781572,0.002777608,0.0011228113],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032694049,0.00045897678,0.000618497,0.011639053,0.0009997588,0.005207164,0.00065546954,0.0014039149,0.006618897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052272182,0.0002165705,0.00064875034,0.022084674,0.0033455184,0.008204597,0.0019051579,0.001182865,0.0008012246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065911363,0.0004644605,0.4615659,0.0015345487,0.000498948,0.001068358,0.0030265881,0.021930335,0.0052294857,0.25053993,0.005195766,0.24828653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012628466,0.00038083494,0.5784321,0.0006648981,0.00041884533,0.0013821666,0.0024721436,0.01761829,0.0060514547,0.36726567,0.025035098,0.00015218709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018900388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021222036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98836094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003119571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014938839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022634208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541016824","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1531","title":"Open access scholarly publications as OER","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Open education; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Scholarship; Prestige; Higher education; World Wide Web; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8106962675610487,"score_gpt":0.7187572455364282,"score_spread":0.09193902202462056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541016824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034052727,0.010778202,0.016961917,0.06681596,0.019247983,0.00024622423,0.00034567495,0.001069966,0.8811288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1799831,0.02214352,0.028132439,0.031013217,0.020836663,0.0005821328,0.0007916583,0.0032054184,0.71331185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9459133,0.018998757,0.0030461738,0.0039524953,0.02618869,0.0019005898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9098829,0.032684837,0.0075363624,0.023593746,0.019556824,0.0067453543],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022263672,0.00075269485,0.000590704,0.005295893,0.004606101,0.0434561,0.0037687495,0.007236014,0.054813873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084046416,0.0006925678,0.00071896403,0.00917804,0.0194547,0.03625931,0.014524293,0.0086404355,0.031208592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016473556,0.000037236343,0.0003188183,0.00038746328,0.000011268862,0.00028987514,0.005798543,0.000101924736,0.0004307572,0.76462203,0.13285261,0.09513295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003616982,0.00001056175,0.00017247292,0.0003399046,0.0000035360465,0.00019839304,0.0018708514,0.00008839839,0.00017123666,0.03347017,0.9636576,0.000013214255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011893751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014995943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99623126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004168362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006798878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18337071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543356285","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02673.x","title":"Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner &amp; Resh (2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Freshwater Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Impartiality; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.7403374696315432,"score_gpt":0.5473373932863184,"score_spread":0.19300007634522487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543356285","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005255387,0.0045129727,0.00031831616,0.98410046,0.010161905,0.000009298008,0.000018914428,0.000025563804,0.0003270666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009248114,0.00634567,0.0016369148,0.9689988,0.0123794,0.00006913862,0.000029792525,0.00008294879,0.0012092573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7701334,0.11640571,0.026962386,0.016968805,0.060361534,0.009168168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2962678,0.47898522,0.048652064,0.011847633,0.12986307,0.03438415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24025403,0.002081147,0.0022718916,0.0046331473,0.0167642,0.035226755,0.009562234,0.051933557,0.0045276815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3938111,0.0018169051,0.0035314332,0.0075961617,0.023878274,0.047438905,0.017134337,0.066269256,0.0030427752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021206055,0.000099632976,0.002999047,0.0022245948,0.000101264035,0.001387942,0.033434678,0.00020887284,0.000604807,0.017706694,0.8976796,0.043340858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166403,0.00025872674,0.003867075,0.0048317094,0.000083388724,0.0027555441,0.051246006,0.00036723143,0.00076558295,0.031715546,0.9035281,0.00046442507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008313596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011105186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75974596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016228225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02754294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93690205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544049225","doi":"10.18438/b8bk60","title":"Evidence-Based Scholarly Communication Conference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.4744856647683098,"score_gpt":0.5059136533603361,"score_spread":0.031427988592026335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544049225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028875936,0.047448758,0.0133574065,0.3991244,0.12864745,0.0015644474,0.0014384654,0.0009289008,0.3786142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5339718,0.026211783,0.028473323,0.04028475,0.07843948,0.0029705155,0.0036475258,0.0004284762,0.28557238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95016146,0.027193764,0.003967014,0.0018921613,0.014253765,0.0025318442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8346945,0.071073055,0.0085328985,0.0129479505,0.048654385,0.024097292],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059996877,0.0008741432,0.00094398926,0.011547059,0.0052417377,0.01696684,0.0032207477,0.010118688,0.06412537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15526019,0.0005219362,0.0011479908,0.0064043673,0.0024342258,0.008211491,0.009650887,0.007921552,0.011031868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000904359,0.0008409423,0.0018927195,0.0019526182,0.00019459242,0.0005087478,0.0023136626,0.00054957677,0.0008807538,0.04491973,0.6123211,0.33272126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020760625,0.0003690584,0.0038404234,0.0023311933,0.00010994038,0.0002300724,0.002732107,0.00092153053,0.0016777933,0.02949556,0.95800686,0.00007789178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001003371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022479969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006436053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01936573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31729758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544279692","doi":"10.1108/09504121211195315","title":"PubMed Central Canada: A Free Archive of Life Science Journals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.7979500745042533,"score_gpt":0.5696406225725056,"score_spread":0.22830945193174768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544279692","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030296582,0.01631814,0.0021695998,0.018506931,0.008731538,0.0011324396,0.7561946,0.01663513,0.17728193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023940025,0.02775045,0.020958994,0.005901754,0.0033759985,0.0013858255,0.4624779,0.005953808,0.44825524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894986,0.00047103572,0.0014715692,0.00080023543,0.006458562,0.0013000554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85009307,0.010741294,0.00817701,0.005930758,0.11040683,0.014650969],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053728637,0.002770112,0.005178307,0.07154218,0.010665636,0.020620907,0.007660073,0.004029049,0.33233428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051953904,0.0019724886,0.0010251714,0.10521166,0.0032925678,0.006176682,0.004994878,0.0033655025,0.1733709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009478851,0.000016824915,0.00027512218,0.001177685,0.000028244443,0.00007886435,0.00009091864,0.00004752776,0.000253878,0.0014851158,0.9757554,0.020695634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013633416,0.000020673066,0.0024872744,0.0008630153,0.00008900296,0.00012633138,0.00028518972,0.0002630982,0.00077119394,0.0013476375,0.99352324,0.000087013956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7630609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84670824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03114268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31008062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9523441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548026587","doi":"10.1002/asi.23601","title":"Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The <scp>MELIBEA</scp> score","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Predictive power; Directory; Actuarial science; Statistics; Predictive value; Medicine; Business; Operations management; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Internal medicine; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.42461814870500303,"score_gpt":0.5635768202144353,"score_spread":0.1389586715094323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548026587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95473063,0.0004127007,0.009593807,0.0012930905,0.00007927427,0.0004188601,0.011146501,0.0005001509,0.021824969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819456,0.00015884526,0.008542578,0.00016390801,0.00010114388,0.0006394051,0.0064570694,0.00012718083,0.0018642322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814449,0.0054268646,0.0031470766,0.0011051293,0.007762305,0.0011136173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85001695,0.057224043,0.053682905,0.011152543,0.020207979,0.007715558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029273314,0.00059394306,0.0009855757,0.012893748,0.00080106425,0.003193752,0.0015647656,0.00083340466,0.0066439128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12066017,0.0003901677,0.0020332343,0.011544288,0.001410374,0.0036446154,0.0042391308,0.0015121641,0.0020480177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000132909,0.00014156674,0.9688898,0.00011255158,0.00036285174,0.000028860077,0.00028237046,0.0009526234,0.00017855753,0.0015131785,0.004340486,0.023064207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024445264,0.0002187214,0.98901236,0.000054612137,0.00011514964,0.000055386146,0.00037578982,0.0040433975,0.00074873125,0.0009915228,0.004316595,0.000043232216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008030486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99843526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021365902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038341912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15481395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548708099","doi":"10.18438/b88w4q","title":"While Collaboration Is Increasing in the Profession the LIS Dissertation Remains a Solo-Authored Monograph","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Accreditation; Library science; Curriculum; Psychology; Internship; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Medicine; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.31097552685322943,"score_gpt":0.4992871824586893,"score_spread":0.18831165560545987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548708099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53479415,0.024775567,0.008873673,0.076909676,0.0014662542,0.00018631555,0.0006997863,0.0007610048,0.35153362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429704,0.008813488,0.0063155103,0.0032352821,0.0013161097,0.00015658652,0.00040420168,0.00013602748,0.03665244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700612,0.015585937,0.0019092727,0.002308277,0.008754415,0.0013809764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90956116,0.038482107,0.015605271,0.004713231,0.01662894,0.015009189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01889893,0.00019903143,0.00057988416,0.00394004,0.007995585,0.016492328,0.00122157,0.0018423392,0.015699176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05879049,0.0003474528,0.00046348918,0.008751231,0.004701582,0.0080931755,0.010161486,0.0017544323,0.00419474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033190093,0.00033514912,0.09975815,0.0030504488,0.00006667814,0.000806183,0.22534397,0.00038864074,0.005321785,0.026085224,0.04579381,0.5927181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006819305,0.00052528153,0.15858665,0.0017359643,0.000046011573,0.0014341985,0.21107912,0.0003509523,0.0014777307,0.009753184,0.6148539,0.000088838104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003206399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064326418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99605995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066119777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018221112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09994829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551860406","doi":"","title":"Carpe Diem - Shall We Make Earth Science First Among the Sciences in Canada? GAC Presidential Address - Annual Meeting Vancouver, British Columbia 26 May 2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geoscience Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential address; Presidential system; Library science; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11719277175373706,"score_gpt":0.37805421985695914,"score_spread":0.2608614481032221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551860406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028508226,0.020949902,0.0006019123,0.86895335,0.020114409,0.00005649513,0.001187589,0.00018673671,0.08509881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06352744,0.023245733,0.003137726,0.23233443,0.002180073,0.00007430167,0.0009967932,0.00038639453,0.67411715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957207,0.00036053307,0.00014555645,0.00033477615,0.002339273,0.0010992048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835886,0.0010124749,0.00023669026,0.00027850707,0.009424716,0.005458997],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047692615,0.0006957362,0.0009052938,0.0023379058,0.017903991,0.014039462,0.0012042497,0.007225882,0.04874204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017507834,0.00071706186,0.00060759566,0.0033566167,0.003864639,0.0064327302,0.0027372558,0.009379515,0.010116588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026253307,0.000010071961,0.00084729336,0.000034719495,0.000006998081,0.00005358111,0.0002494355,0.000040160372,0.00007233508,0.0051524057,0.97961926,0.013887616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012181955,0.000006393827,0.0030323316,0.00016473203,0.000012424119,0.000038150443,0.0021680286,0.0000776549,0.0001609059,0.0030406963,0.991239,0.000047502905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93597883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99523073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040139154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12479115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29123133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552151481","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.243","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Scientific literature; Population; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6998329989555784,"score_gpt":0.5995986486184482,"score_spread":0.10023435033713013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552151481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91523707,0.0114591345,0.01740191,0.009783021,0.0012179737,0.003365588,0.00027526048,0.00038478433,0.040875327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701533,0.0034478873,0.017465414,0.00044896101,0.0011271453,0.0006009132,0.00021619529,0.000068123394,0.0064720404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.87364167,0.07539998,0.00872495,0.003280489,0.03666778,0.0022850784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65873015,0.17713091,0.057419438,0.010560791,0.08396482,0.012193889],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05893567,0.0005266565,0.00095799094,0.006903482,0.0044969027,0.008519456,0.0022294098,0.0016169432,0.0027449555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23362434,0.000386708,0.0007064298,0.0052807853,0.0025511659,0.004334711,0.0024083,0.0012002811,0.0018330879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012798959,0.001966582,0.16503781,0.0036719763,0.00044906573,0.0029836236,0.07816827,0.0016288306,0.010702526,0.010066994,0.022357296,0.70168716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005463566,0.0051024826,0.6044709,0.0026113063,0.00055619824,0.008357583,0.115901284,0.010953357,0.0153728565,0.024055967,0.21116579,0.0009059244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014718097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015707779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94106436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025019918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013135375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31168532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553659993","doi":"10.18438/b8dw26","title":"A Content Analysis of Google Scholar: Coverage Varies by Discipline and by Database","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; PsycINFO; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; English language; Database; Content analysis; MEDLINE; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.27126809770882476,"score_gpt":0.48585904676943675,"score_spread":0.214590949060612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553659993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.934702,0.016173065,0.0073773325,0.0032615557,0.00015966184,0.0020670006,0.015911236,0.00023056977,0.020117648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98052204,0.0040144324,0.0078011476,0.00036050798,0.00012922513,0.0013137979,0.0053373254,0.000086816915,0.00043475282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91264755,0.04374193,0.013560397,0.0039501954,0.024373451,0.0017264362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59453565,0.30057088,0.04496023,0.010893584,0.0470145,0.0020250771],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046590324,0.0004091809,0.0016200044,0.065608606,0.0012143279,0.006274747,0.0015507828,0.00077022857,0.002674686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29386416,0.0004157834,0.0016535588,0.08875575,0.0020983366,0.005690211,0.0046556247,0.00045635682,0.0005657705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011313094,0.00021993303,0.6951193,0.017922193,0.002602117,0.00034299382,0.033373047,0.00057260226,0.0020920825,0.005138531,0.008338265,0.2331477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012988504,0.0004825195,0.91972303,0.0076892427,0.0022055032,0.00094606314,0.03843766,0.002319627,0.0021120545,0.0022407337,0.023598596,0.0001150902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005439897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051381798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032403124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005152276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24639612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556404523","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1735064","title":"Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Patent portfolio; Adverse selection; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.3594921832956024,"score_gpt":0.4745913030827797,"score_spread":0.1150991197871773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556404523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82999223,0.008219924,0.015949395,0.06058103,0.0003663389,0.00029656818,0.0015923147,0.00014603743,0.08285621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500436,0.0005962986,0.00046395516,0.0004651467,0.00028166536,0.000042868527,0.000117469914,0.000007175161,0.0030209292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97463924,0.013367431,0.002691238,0.0014575344,0.005163938,0.0026806872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6901486,0.20627123,0.06604076,0.013948211,0.012176397,0.011414758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036213566,0.00034947257,0.0012440141,0.0032512504,0.0017095057,0.012246731,0.0010877666,0.0045120516,0.010396131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20094337,0.00037700665,0.00043333106,0.0056367745,0.0027305628,0.007716905,0.0035709194,0.0016813084,0.0010269524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002621482,0.0009203751,0.42225927,0.0009195705,0.00071880687,0.0007450294,0.0034708863,0.007219014,0.001319014,0.20482616,0.015123287,0.33985713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084577134,0.00085645454,0.20893292,0.0007138442,0.00077830773,0.0011613618,0.005065731,0.017378343,0.0032787034,0.72676075,0.03407758,0.00015019947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012227678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015487942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99674875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060641025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19151789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155739840","doi":"10.7202/1029237ar","title":"La valorisation de la recherche : savoir investir dans le savoir","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7534352182341003,"score_gpt":0.5969145407895278,"score_spread":0.15652067744457254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155739840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09269541,0.03927075,0.10247342,0.5548844,0.0058152988,0.00053598895,0.00022186142,0.0011833557,0.20291957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.726314,0.023423044,0.12096705,0.0401909,0.002411627,0.0007208504,0.00031981684,0.00080863555,0.08484411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85181737,0.10699181,0.006088209,0.008304819,0.021357255,0.0054405853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.761284,0.100414574,0.014801124,0.038763672,0.0633501,0.02138661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09655004,0.001029879,0.0017321694,0.0037629122,0.009191374,0.032982413,0.0034066297,0.0076594963,0.007209006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14201027,0.001178177,0.0017145134,0.005029731,0.020252954,0.025118073,0.012753705,0.008755397,0.004209469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003955191,0.0006100111,0.026875554,0.00361666,0.00054049556,0.0012331144,0.12916538,0.00091413746,0.01505909,0.4076548,0.055516798,0.35841843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090975605,0.00054555706,0.012219829,0.0047532083,0.00031639903,0.0010375122,0.059418805,0.0013567321,0.0055160006,0.17477256,0.7397691,0.0002033588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01054606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013488584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010769023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053374957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51061153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558261592","doi":"10.18438/b8d90k","title":"Perception and Information Behaviour of Institutional Repository End-Users Provides Valuable Insight for Future Development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Phone; Medical education; Coding (social sciences); Psychology; The arts; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.17137841858777303,"score_gpt":0.4294235495464267,"score_spread":0.25804513095865367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558261592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97081304,0.00159902,0.003582142,0.0058405297,0.000032922188,0.000121320474,0.00041341252,0.00006849412,0.017529111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932789,0.0010030249,0.003163972,0.00043713854,0.000019452005,0.000090737274,0.00022575517,0.000013651001,0.0017675002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903527,0.0068727997,0.00044727852,0.000522528,0.0011186054,0.00068607926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673437,0.019232797,0.004764598,0.0017439313,0.004755233,0.002159726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014697141,0.00024172895,0.00045298896,0.0013166205,0.0007886641,0.004664071,0.0009678989,0.000597609,0.007995759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029621786,0.00018759358,0.00039851668,0.002308959,0.0011361215,0.0074658287,0.0015122406,0.00061096577,0.001181767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002578434,0.00075232575,0.72627175,0.0009087478,0.000056746765,0.00045095102,0.088223115,0.00017643461,0.0022488108,0.004473233,0.0040218458,0.17215812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021505151,0.00072806625,0.5824089,0.00091697054,0.000048298723,0.0005440038,0.37718245,0.0011475475,0.0019739338,0.0021946395,0.032759856,0.0000737994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032181435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034932587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99533594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001549188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020190398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07772678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558953815","doi":"","title":"Before and After: OA in Developing Countries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hispana","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Poverty; Political science; Economic growth; Publishing; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.29895197940568186,"score_gpt":0.5168096986519236,"score_spread":0.21785771924624175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558953815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16171513,0.12087019,0.0008484418,0.08751303,0.010899722,0.0002218341,0.005996662,0.00029542515,0.6116395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75338215,0.09908634,0.001762957,0.017930582,0.0022822637,0.00023890086,0.0019362258,0.00018117442,0.12319942],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.0001559506,0.00008091468,0.00010177354,0.00014222151,0.00041906722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998252,0.00032293613,0.00034998,0.00009359571,0.0003603482,0.0006211136],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009462738,0.0005283648,0.00035150527,0.0016652278,0.003401864,0.007196421,0.0004956302,0.0010715537,0.032281306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026182663,0.00016870938,0.00029693387,0.00551458,0.002344652,0.0028036854,0.002747566,0.001377059,0.004561071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054650387,0.00024369759,0.08168564,0.006971993,0.000067281384,0.01056529,0.03089884,0.00044766715,0.0028032563,0.14628267,0.34056205,0.3789252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017306591,0.00006793461,0.044689327,0.001908839,0.000014374264,0.0016882033,0.02176786,0.000035140976,0.00034353122,0.0027275297,0.92671794,0.000022055478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021816378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019137938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021290113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007691952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107991755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564712492","doi":"10.18438/b8c88z","title":"Open Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact Than Articles Not Freely Available","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Sample (material); Population; Citation impact; Library science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Sociology; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.6662192534586677,"score_gpt":0.5933869394796585,"score_spread":0.07283231397900924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564712492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11772089,0.45075315,0.0075534573,0.1850909,0.029840559,0.0009912455,0.00488938,0.0006457112,0.20251475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56124777,0.31180015,0.017686566,0.030902239,0.043894075,0.0010452205,0.0035924832,0.0005223756,0.029309155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9425199,0.016932229,0.007979435,0.0032853496,0.027435,0.0018479732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6652443,0.16854848,0.0798125,0.009758282,0.06681214,0.009824258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027597576,0.000864635,0.001747681,0.029646253,0.0024071557,0.01951839,0.0009993816,0.0038914424,0.031284653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16293226,0.0007595084,0.0020747513,0.03704108,0.004031358,0.017049648,0.0053343754,0.0030312685,0.006542246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007653364,0.0006928777,0.068942286,0.023089318,0.0020387718,0.0010494718,0.0047166483,0.0003083997,0.003953657,0.023598567,0.15884742,0.71199715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043866105,0.0011716279,0.25629723,0.021456212,0.0027120952,0.0045385794,0.008819814,0.00048417973,0.0038170314,0.04468426,0.6551968,0.00038354186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014382231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030469222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003987969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005487819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14595169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565511706","doi":"10.1353/ils.2014.0011","title":"A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between the h-Index and Excess Citations / Étude préliminaire de la relation entre l’indice de Hirsch (indice-h) et les citations excédentaires","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Index (typography); Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.14153556382044188,"score_gpt":0.4228877936025121,"score_spread":0.2813522297820702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565511706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586346,0.0050373655,0.021692067,0.00086015556,0.00004624799,0.00007107909,0.0012670489,0.0001357967,0.012255504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922592,0.0010142686,0.0041662296,0.000074027455,0.00013100891,0.000025990368,0.0007886129,0.000019843928,0.0015208588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987612,0.00054008525,0.00010910026,0.00025601903,0.00021861597,0.000115112896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91486424,0.07342514,0.0054806974,0.002032372,0.0033238276,0.00087370985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047499537,0.00040491918,0.00057668344,0.0033478132,0.0004360024,0.0013223038,0.00065062236,0.0006792791,0.0059129293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032892715,0.00021485762,0.00084260094,0.0057672504,0.00074827217,0.0023085908,0.0005433666,0.0012732265,0.0011561909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480321,0.00031312948,0.9169147,0.00040677766,0.0005594716,0.00074284314,0.000997239,0.0072005973,0.0042036073,0.011894981,0.0009586952,0.055259913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034755176,0.0010871604,0.942414,0.00008230752,0.0003352487,0.0010719051,0.0015919689,0.03215018,0.0038688795,0.010973849,0.006293079,0.000096755066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005308256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034910815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005998042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076749315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025120437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565843765","doi":"","title":"Neither Open nor Shut: Health Information Access in Developing and Emerging Countries.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Developing country; Public relations; Business; Information access; Access to information; Health care; Political science; Internet privacy; Economic growth; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5941593521243856,"score_gpt":0.6360898129037973,"score_spread":0.04193046077941165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565843765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119002976,0.16735888,0.0043260762,0.3211228,0.005200394,0.00033346427,0.037979685,0.0004870713,0.3441886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90701216,0.04529333,0.004358246,0.008317942,0.0015757546,0.0002451772,0.007947681,0.00010667815,0.02514297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935527,0.0022975544,0.00086495833,0.0003706191,0.0023792468,0.0005349934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546432,0.024540273,0.0077069956,0.0020104288,0.00663221,0.004466895],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008166211,0.00019617852,0.00040574724,0.0061219195,0.0016438061,0.0081933215,0.0007156136,0.0012950376,0.033315316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050829563,0.00018930994,0.0002619015,0.021061877,0.0024446202,0.011990866,0.004853588,0.001765394,0.002422296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041602313,0.00011793302,0.08459838,0.0042471215,0.0001274857,0.0005883159,0.0053236666,0.00034416516,0.00028577802,0.17509073,0.24008475,0.48877576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006943451,0.00014275026,0.18808325,0.0045151426,0.00014627227,0.0013395397,0.019473188,0.0009686848,0.00078664644,0.062092908,0.72229683,0.0000853437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01123596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012827878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003934086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009717085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11145091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568789937","doi":"10.1002/asi.23166","title":"The kiss of death? The effect of being cited in a review on subsequent citations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Montreal Heart Institute; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; KISS (TNC); Science Citation Index; Specialty; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.23939433756577272,"score_gpt":0.5484870714168609,"score_spread":0.3090927338510882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568789937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10657614,0.8708697,0.0008931146,0.012702572,0.0016345663,0.000058374593,0.00028741584,0.000021137159,0.006957097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74366057,0.24635878,0.0008141227,0.0028389294,0.0036496804,0.00011433571,0.00022417399,0.000029308054,0.0023100437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751134,0.011976747,0.003899711,0.0016289856,0.0067638936,0.0006172787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6424047,0.28424948,0.04476921,0.005386485,0.01909734,0.0040928535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033234198,0.00028740705,0.0012269743,0.005405838,0.0007645757,0.0030500814,0.0008533408,0.0013284803,0.0036799666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27010617,0.00022918831,0.0015672611,0.009006054,0.0013633041,0.0043351147,0.0014281003,0.0022194013,0.000599767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038271765,0.0002817875,0.32916075,0.022342702,0.008952191,0.00083913316,0.0034901947,0.00069853704,0.00088502286,0.0064281686,0.010928543,0.61216587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003296108,0.002032479,0.87398595,0.01473269,0.016685572,0.0035941803,0.004252021,0.0006919344,0.0016150507,0.014802747,0.067114554,0.00016327284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002183907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040188218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99459416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013534972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022073877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17576134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572712462","doi":"","title":"Harnad Comments on Canada’s NSERC/SSHRC/CIHR Draft Tri-Agency Open Access Policy. Canadian Tri-Agency Call for Comments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Publication; Institution; Compliance (psychology); Political science; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.209948260839589,"score_gpt":0.4157440696272036,"score_spread":0.2057958087876146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572712462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005853404,0.0016374256,0.0007933224,0.88572496,0.03456714,0.00032793,0.0039194543,0.00072529336,0.07171917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075761513,0.0019116858,0.0025945005,0.47525796,0.005420742,0.00024852486,0.0018554475,0.00075306906,0.504382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97433937,0.0017908429,0.0012383098,0.0015548158,0.017151693,0.0039249565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87692046,0.022625843,0.0019125565,0.0030203373,0.08529843,0.01022248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021845026,0.0015386275,0.0018027709,0.003215662,0.0124616595,0.009240072,0.006531847,0.028343974,0.098967165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115240365,0.000981464,0.0018189038,0.0060529592,0.0046914825,0.00430134,0.003152837,0.016825404,0.036835592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008426781,0.0000049915693,0.00004670457,0.0000100229445,0.0000010435245,0.00003476228,0.00004654246,0.000016937503,0.000024122755,0.0010003455,0.99779546,0.0010106469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010347289,0.0000047702756,0.00061285676,0.000050333558,0.0000055882933,0.000022299135,0.00026035385,0.000096773554,0.000103479564,0.0005810169,0.99821126,0.00004084658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8931138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91985947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99346817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06408465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14582415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46496886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573484005","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101147","title":"Uncertainty of author citation rankings: Lessons from in‐text citation weighing schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Weighting; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; Medicine; Radiology; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.1825142580732141,"score_gpt":0.4733073030465287,"score_spread":0.2907930449733146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573484005","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25838917,0.002950141,0.7113751,0.009340678,0.0006346883,0.00027832048,0.00066667947,0.0002989222,0.01606629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118755,0.0009053914,0.08408637,0.00061041524,0.00068821065,0.00019164149,0.00023051698,0.00011214332,0.0012997525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735275,0.018147213,0.0015341821,0.0014882259,0.004833383,0.0004694812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69789577,0.2549153,0.0139611345,0.014794851,0.017020341,0.0014126371],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063265145,0.0009332915,0.0016521331,0.004972771,0.0015810634,0.005538972,0.0023214722,0.0017694589,0.0025731225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3859863,0.0005920951,0.00077693496,0.0055459337,0.002586248,0.009906394,0.0028909731,0.0030014052,0.00038619371],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006926894,0.00043339748,0.048202835,0.0011027567,0.0009088201,0.00023892542,0.0042093424,0.12570506,0.0015159089,0.45164376,0.008743647,0.3566028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006004959,0.00011228653,0.006306536,0.00022612093,0.00012672784,0.000077015844,0.00041435641,0.22385325,0.0014677517,0.763051,0.004209089,0.00009583204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027237844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016157265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99502724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027334224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014749469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3345821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576976718","doi":"10.3386/w20012","title":"Why Stars Matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tetra Tech (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stars; Astrophysics; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.8938438393618267,"score_gpt":0.7133195741200734,"score_spread":0.18052426524175325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576976718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30517423,0.028755987,0.009005899,0.25972497,0.003355225,0.00008367262,0.0027201748,0.0003757242,0.39080414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257818,0.010303064,0.0009198114,0.016842615,0.0022144783,0.000030050223,0.00077033526,0.00019062951,0.042947087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819106,0.0006294037,0.000071104376,0.00034204425,0.00041646475,0.00034990822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858416,0.0046297163,0.0018112015,0.00082949223,0.0018436905,0.002301671],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022612766,0.00019842792,0.0005017316,0.0011271928,0.0016371671,0.004837787,0.00049313635,0.0021627715,0.04881527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021777017,0.0001857034,0.0003306668,0.0020292636,0.0032349788,0.0052568386,0.0013929199,0.0015634908,0.013837258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003449684,0.00017704794,0.107158504,0.00058905716,0.00014256353,0.00045899182,0.0042842315,0.0008827814,0.000776618,0.49386442,0.19288395,0.198437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012824478,0.00020792632,0.09154548,0.00048971764,0.00008229769,0.0005834141,0.0060521006,0.00086782005,0.0006865676,0.47309786,0.42620632,0.00005221455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003278553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031620415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012629402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010402234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16330338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581079432","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.376819","title":"Scatter And Obsolescence Of Journals Cited In Dissertations Of Librarianship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Obsolescence; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.24540552537627766,"score_gpt":0.41916391433314915,"score_spread":0.17375838895687148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581079432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160063,0.0031775334,0.0006192977,0.0002099943,0.000030483543,0.000014633864,0.001414312,0.00008870654,0.0028443334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954164,0.0012344979,0.0003565416,0.000034339108,0.00013809642,0.000019202114,0.0020680553,0.000037904334,0.0006948897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924334,0.0012992676,0.0014781296,0.0010910515,0.0032413306,0.00045677033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86456376,0.0674217,0.038403023,0.0063654333,0.020222334,0.0030238014],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076580476,0.00030056734,0.00073998753,0.03519771,0.0011150738,0.003937565,0.00079719734,0.0005749566,0.0024064162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07812908,0.00040264757,0.00060702837,0.029460138,0.0011858993,0.0029974624,0.0026494812,0.00041767478,0.0011910292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017983992,0.000024577816,0.9756771,0.00014302362,0.0002052873,0.00011450612,0.0023392932,0.00015986053,0.00067970244,0.00034507026,0.0006030714,0.019528614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000569595,0.000053376833,0.9944746,0.000044278724,0.00005029068,0.00046030976,0.0019113456,0.0004029969,0.00035836073,0.00036826677,0.0018530239,0.000017342509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022046997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026890454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96480227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009622621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071833056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040500104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581752436","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03917.x","title":"Editorial: Citation analysis – focus on leading Australian nurse authors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Watson; Citation; Listing (finance); Index (typography); Subject (documents); Medicine; Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Nursing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5684659979264239,"score_gpt":0.6619747808854075,"score_spread":0.09350878295898357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581752436","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021783939,0.012941631,0.00014805824,0.042940833,0.9424288,0.00007026535,0.00010425627,0.00006913114,0.0010792362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013499926,0.017296804,0.00019034997,0.03170449,0.9441971,0.00012860991,0.00010527975,0.00009658747,0.00493083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982428,0.002789325,0.0034004487,0.0017061083,0.008676256,0.0009997711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8725875,0.041108664,0.009942563,0.0022439773,0.06596701,0.008150204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01972194,0.0047739875,0.0057185898,0.019289108,0.004290957,0.014939505,0.0060783983,0.014757156,0.022339216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09689736,0.0015568851,0.004049327,0.010530447,0.004141401,0.0095862085,0.0035745336,0.009789093,0.0130291395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073564224,0.000033935412,0.00016808696,0.002105046,0.000038413615,0.000103536804,0.00008309464,0.000044035463,0.00007277634,0.00020230327,0.98478425,0.01229088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008446074,0.000107942695,0.002286033,0.006833,0.0001806733,0.0007120768,0.00041739526,0.00022173615,0.00022004143,0.0011833408,0.987694,0.00005920511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002731354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98071086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00782979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067609237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10430086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583343309","doi":"10.3386/w19653","title":"Collaboration, Stars, and the Changing Organization of Science: Evidence from Evolutionary Biology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Stars; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.7481729510294182,"score_gpt":0.6608296926846551,"score_spread":0.08734325834476309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583343309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97606534,0.0044230395,0.0017828675,0.0034122956,0.000029495519,0.000011067309,0.00033516693,0.000011856912,0.013928946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996503,0.0020211493,0.0004485873,0.00020749659,0.000048296668,0.0000039787033,0.00024361839,0.000004401823,0.0005195118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783117,0.0008449407,0.00015980063,0.00039581224,0.0004570632,0.00031132877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669972,0.0125634605,0.012601042,0.0018941471,0.0023474558,0.0035967021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049179043,0.0001736663,0.0004257965,0.0038466307,0.0012118691,0.0022789054,0.0005020983,0.0008061638,0.0033879895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018789502,0.00014308962,0.00060866855,0.007730873,0.0021899003,0.0023417438,0.0028956889,0.0006537745,0.0004628892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003013519,0.00011266552,0.9260644,0.00021849843,0.00037990487,0.0005526906,0.002616402,0.002106794,0.000586728,0.016186481,0.0011750556,0.049699068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005338376,0.00014204452,0.96704435,0.00009271149,0.00017921756,0.00041707937,0.0027929135,0.0016565459,0.0003305933,0.020051425,0.007215652,0.000024153866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008195108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99615335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007601941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075342174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026008666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585638762","doi":"10.3171/2009.12.jns091600","title":"Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Neurosurgery; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Randomized controlled trial; MEDLINE; Grading (engineering); Library science; Surgery","score_opus":0.646295052394199,"score_gpt":0.550198320626132,"score_spread":0.09609673176806699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585638762","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009486439,0.9107469,0.0017058677,0.00876997,0.023253433,0.0005861796,0.009386565,0.0002692885,0.03579541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0778143,0.84662086,0.008158003,0.0034340387,0.02589948,0.0011778789,0.013271584,0.00026990485,0.023354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153954,0.001494882,0.0022525142,0.0005276379,0.003724835,0.0004605474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544201,0.018886173,0.011207983,0.0009855954,0.012701216,0.0017989536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068840324,0.0014411226,0.0017242038,0.090362206,0.0015445938,0.009374019,0.0012332704,0.0013255684,0.024263823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04823892,0.00060613174,0.0010354532,0.11246907,0.0014848723,0.005655461,0.002184755,0.000977275,0.008756817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002388532,0.00007993152,0.012671029,0.045754842,0.00030727425,0.0004964337,0.0022709053,0.00022013989,0.0009696313,0.008644407,0.31853184,0.60981476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038708476,0.00018016477,0.053088363,0.031678677,0.0004525003,0.0037949474,0.0025175265,0.0002587839,0.00055743055,0.005494802,0.90184134,0.000096801145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032432864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041636317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99311596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028904083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005830876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08117062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588400856","doi":"10.1002/ana.24218","title":"A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at <i><scp>S</scp>troke</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Research Canada; University of Toronto; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; University of Toronto; American Heart Association","keywords":"Intraclass correlation; Odds ratio; Odds; Confidence interval; Consistency (knowledge bases); Logistic regression; Peer review; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Stroke (engine); Family medicine; Clinical psychology; Internal medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.46637048693521965,"score_gpt":0.5597930264671542,"score_spread":0.09342253953193458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588400856","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01952533,0.02660999,0.018423555,0.59904444,0.32195958,0.0013943235,0.00040853556,0.0011782491,0.011456035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23504125,0.030179026,0.050908074,0.18320921,0.4825459,0.0022382832,0.00061431865,0.0016489741,0.013614972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.66752654,0.17377938,0.04629111,0.012763205,0.09460487,0.0050348416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16323176,0.39947537,0.085698225,0.025114866,0.30480096,0.02167878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20719585,0.0012517483,0.0026454788,0.0069163516,0.008323198,0.025496269,0.004930365,0.004507505,0.006027374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6762001,0.0015008771,0.0016796243,0.005655721,0.010667819,0.010453192,0.004231051,0.009856932,0.0038679063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003572729,0.0001049483,0.012560214,0.00272552,0.0004526554,0.0007634581,0.0045594405,0.00016831965,0.0007075035,0.0032046493,0.8566777,0.11771824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004341518,0.0006066585,0.029311508,0.010931503,0.00070966635,0.002804933,0.01165436,0.0038148141,0.0029756138,0.023576235,0.912499,0.0006814577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025661453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066932095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7928041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056812344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030070214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97766864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590457913","doi":"10.1080/17521742.2012.713757","title":"What do Canadian Journal Editors Want from Peer Review?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Editors Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Round table; Table (database); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Session (web analytics); Database","score_opus":0.3245269501362181,"score_gpt":0.5029702531478972,"score_spread":0.17844330301167916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590457913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006971417,0.017585583,0.00023664044,0.8962266,0.0072985576,0.0000665148,0.00035246747,0.00012357996,0.071138665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.377238,0.05104264,0.003298825,0.42402986,0.021684077,0.0002481257,0.0010944855,0.0005618594,0.12080214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9081782,0.015731467,0.0035168258,0.0039633233,0.058105394,0.010504711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6465312,0.050098535,0.016514877,0.0077571785,0.1886951,0.09040305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046708647,0.000628548,0.0016872133,0.005233077,0.023226196,0.032988716,0.0034979677,0.012895739,0.021043068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3016513,0.00052774145,0.00089413807,0.009511598,0.011703247,0.012811181,0.004259315,0.008073179,0.0054467428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013154112,0.00007861267,0.0106789265,0.0011826052,0.00011446574,0.0006546225,0.006906333,0.000075731885,0.00035276567,0.013556637,0.85012084,0.11614691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090886366,0.00006034933,0.035060156,0.0011957068,0.00010103161,0.0005341306,0.013748059,0.0001068997,0.000221778,0.008925725,0.9397124,0.0002428305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68995583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95329136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053482197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20266783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62374014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590572075","doi":"10.5539/ass.v11n13p130","title":"The Scientific Articles on Art Criticism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art criticism; The arts; Criticism; Citation; Theatre criticism; Art; Literary criticism; Visual arts; Library science; Art history; Literature; Computer science; Performance art; Literary science","score_opus":0.6153866519150007,"score_gpt":0.5900754236712312,"score_spread":0.025311228243769524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590572075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085791424,0.53767395,0.00717946,0.055336505,0.032710098,0.0006795972,0.008051697,0.0004916291,0.2720857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34586912,0.5039592,0.012212111,0.013847683,0.039796855,0.00053248816,0.010539437,0.0006221907,0.07262096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720072,0.0049514193,0.003924188,0.0013009224,0.017166601,0.00064975565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83231086,0.0829417,0.027022656,0.0070585846,0.04720948,0.0034567297],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014197143,0.00060877035,0.0011897304,0.039505284,0.0026669314,0.010817387,0.0010175655,0.0014864093,0.020531049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09304869,0.00034674729,0.0013328925,0.061203495,0.0024782207,0.005695253,0.0028970137,0.0013812378,0.006322795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018036456,0.000106035106,0.026836358,0.023574047,0.0004080442,0.0011172087,0.0061477805,0.0002527644,0.0029227268,0.01795135,0.19415109,0.7263521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001934672,0.00006765122,0.05304008,0.009297516,0.0003335615,0.0025193784,0.004494669,0.00016880843,0.0012303343,0.0076414286,0.9211322,0.000055031796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013566989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002240335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002917783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007587328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07508254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591028215","doi":"","title":"Feasibility of Open Access Publishing for Journals Funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Research council; Political science; Scholarly communication; Open science; Digital humanities; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9598328188527745,"score_gpt":0.7337601371546307,"score_spread":0.22607268169814376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591028215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96456903,0.00037926013,0.0008188188,0.0039560506,0.00010236153,0.00084691355,0.0005695335,0.00004756845,0.028710548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924803,0.00033038403,0.002079343,0.0001816969,0.00007206639,0.0002397615,0.00034817107,0.000017211258,0.004251082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9005903,0.027026158,0.0064999964,0.0032901075,0.057123378,0.0054699844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53039306,0.2573812,0.038529288,0.019108374,0.12331227,0.031275705],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050859217,0.00024277528,0.0006434961,0.005745669,0.008130044,0.011859395,0.0024248336,0.0015926053,0.005731105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2624163,0.00050035806,0.00072352664,0.007963355,0.0043176287,0.0066071814,0.006470898,0.0017705939,0.0007389502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052071405,0.0052126185,0.5946464,0.00088448595,0.00022776771,0.0028956144,0.04919276,0.0018716113,0.004038756,0.025709646,0.0087698875,0.30134317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013941389,0.006096164,0.75216705,0.00056431675,0.00028638984,0.0011282605,0.136433,0.0076907347,0.00965924,0.0148930615,0.06913366,0.0005538834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20443335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25272465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99757516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01482705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053154733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4064868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591210727","doi":"10.1086/703160","title":"Age and the Trying Out of New Ideas","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Capital","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Aalto-Yliopisto","keywords":"Assertion; Biomedicine; Work (physics); Test (biology); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.641428749180741,"score_gpt":0.5710017791758731,"score_spread":0.07042697000486786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591210727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467954,0.009441759,0.0016961186,0.0117636,0.00036982744,0.00003996996,0.00024287496,0.000026042755,0.02962444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916728,0.003830496,0.00050490286,0.0009830582,0.0004325879,0.000025653426,0.00008832105,0.000017389653,0.002444862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187404,0.0036519428,0.0012271755,0.00059326336,0.0018734393,0.0007801052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7813156,0.11589525,0.06334711,0.008117325,0.013516514,0.017808225],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02134864,0.000206781,0.00045728433,0.0046860795,0.0016676171,0.005736001,0.00066043675,0.0013432014,0.007782395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115946785,0.00023635407,0.00045463193,0.003835159,0.0029874584,0.0066410876,0.0033411267,0.0017397412,0.0013833011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004663976,0.00025090887,0.80529445,0.0004965357,0.00019032914,0.0007364107,0.04395911,0.00040203784,0.0009924157,0.021222139,0.007213485,0.1187758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017132689,0.00068690866,0.731753,0.0013674777,0.0003321808,0.0029570707,0.06830191,0.0012965127,0.0022676603,0.0668103,0.12386476,0.00019085211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010812362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010921936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99531394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011058184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019628708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112903774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593807601","doi":"10.3386/w10875","title":"Standing on Academic Shoulders: Measuring Scientific Influence in Universities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Political science; Mathematics; Geography; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.901965728604337,"score_gpt":0.6916294035109724,"score_spread":0.21033632509336464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593807601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587468,0.002203549,0.0013771479,0.00092264917,0.000089335525,0.00003751145,0.00048899715,0.0000901441,0.03604374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979924,0.00034150426,0.00027813396,0.00006336931,0.00024722106,0.000014219725,0.00027337254,0.000010450847,0.0007792399],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887406,0.0025508488,0.0010280719,0.00089059985,0.0057561616,0.0010337625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873995,0.059448533,0.024071211,0.0033787598,0.0140377665,0.011664244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007544891,0.00047656606,0.0012932607,0.016621165,0.0025455167,0.004312478,0.0011016357,0.0015017692,0.0048699216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103578426,0.00023834595,0.00057541515,0.020053077,0.0020737783,0.0036873869,0.0050539477,0.0008734417,0.0015485672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039692354,0.00027699448,0.8922239,0.00020046147,0.00045249064,0.00017104615,0.004835491,0.002218267,0.001380792,0.0032464787,0.0035880827,0.091009006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053622523,0.00039207793,0.9761595,0.000094714436,0.000376966,0.0003138389,0.0037664187,0.0034778127,0.0014938699,0.0063332357,0.0074720285,0.00006584961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005164261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049232347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014243034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017639289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039901674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595508338","doi":"","title":"Canada shut out at Ig Nobels","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shut down; Shame; Operations research; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.304914450536996,"score_gpt":0.41976724058554377,"score_spread":0.11485279004854776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595508338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02952256,0.009206017,0.0009792711,0.49866804,0.048340276,0.0003082695,0.009564592,0.00079058454,0.40262032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09703765,0.0032778531,0.00089183834,0.11016238,0.0021965087,0.00016713302,0.0029515817,0.00036338624,0.78295153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820753,0.00060585915,0.0002331553,0.0011731788,0.008627582,0.0072849263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974158,0.0007371918,0.00038608137,0.0006499032,0.010310153,0.0137585895],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00689956,0.0010949157,0.0013612378,0.0033447025,0.037976723,0.01729853,0.0023349405,0.008603749,0.05631166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014834805,0.00066602306,0.0015567562,0.0041900137,0.005986286,0.002569037,0.006642755,0.011842771,0.010257274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015103552,0.000024518467,0.0016047396,0.00005340968,0.000028412313,0.00027562212,0.00093188474,0.000060525133,0.00023682181,0.016232546,0.9696633,0.010737135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025083087,0.000018524657,0.0037205447,0.00007803182,0.000016524466,0.000025141284,0.0017025596,0.000033515782,0.00017681622,0.00096218474,0.99320763,0.000033269327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97844714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98735166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111054376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30799866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80575967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595946397","doi":"10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a439","title":"The access principle: The case for open access to research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Presentation (obstetrics); Publishing; Open access publishing; Open science; Open access journal; Free access; Political science; World Wide Web; Public access; Open data; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Public relations; Law; Medicine; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8622194212442152,"score_gpt":0.7137649815928947,"score_spread":0.14845443965132055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595946397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021163218,0.009022841,0.22700162,0.19154072,0.001850585,0.00037549043,0.00019053661,0.00021788703,0.5486372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84567225,0.004959214,0.073925264,0.02698312,0.0051940503,0.0019833252,0.00012508417,0.00024066384,0.04091703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88970816,0.05712539,0.0052604782,0.012140843,0.029826354,0.0059387335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7948507,0.15044473,0.007608472,0.03141804,0.0092862025,0.006391898],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09738118,0.0008059281,0.0024347955,0.004007883,0.01099155,0.027214414,0.004066436,0.0224385,0.009680514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13254298,0.0014797681,0.0023357682,0.004720741,0.09811941,0.05759455,0.026481297,0.016455807,0.002067246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051782117,0.0000041666867,0.000055845336,0.000018790772,0.0000035242458,0.000034035653,0.0003167029,0.000038327766,0.000020289515,0.9978702,0.0005154024,0.0011175512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266164,0.00001578104,0.000077793906,0.0000807468,0.0000062051017,0.00013699583,0.00023103581,0.00018619231,0.000059105998,0.976841,0.02232633,0.000012214534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021075346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013251506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055547035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010640598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598310546","doi":"","title":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","year":2008,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Paradigmes: economia productiva i coneixement","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science","score_opus":0.5389205968513442,"score_gpt":0.47610652513235613,"score_spread":0.06281407171898806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598310546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006984228,0.009476387,0.0045587365,0.07492342,0.014704524,0.0013442528,0.043940388,0.0024110044,0.84165704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025447274,0.004117987,0.005697852,0.0041055903,0.00067765376,0.00043064434,0.010221524,0.0006079688,0.9486935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99133486,0.0006251473,0.00036645157,0.0010372096,0.0046683713,0.001968062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97658783,0.0006368795,0.000733655,0.0009696686,0.013921079,0.00715086],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004168239,0.0015312546,0.0013573703,0.0034725133,0.005464937,0.008129532,0.0024601289,0.0026260365,0.33435887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010198536,0.0008448573,0.00091820623,0.0032169947,0.0014732105,0.0017074374,0.004028175,0.0016566016,0.10155438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018489515,0.000042349548,0.0015056698,0.0003088092,0.00002533601,0.0002270357,0.00016415206,0.00014285723,0.00037015212,0.01367289,0.9437958,0.03955994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007863844,0.00002815454,0.0037646852,0.00012359016,0.000014406328,0.00013427425,0.0002054489,0.00020131192,0.0002013626,0.0009304925,0.99429756,0.000020033278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5892133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8168086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03578228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1347877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598481361","doi":"","title":"Open Access Policy Update","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Agency (philosophy); Library science; Public administration; Alliance; Public policy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.44135142519868553,"score_gpt":0.5422289887435497,"score_spread":0.10087756354486421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598481361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010082398,0.021431513,0.0049771485,0.29590836,0.03910211,0.00045436504,0.015993161,0.004249105,0.61687607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015063572,0.043910403,0.014811859,0.23756178,0.019747812,0.0011892067,0.033278838,0.0039019315,0.63053465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9527651,0.0031300392,0.0032057362,0.002734462,0.03210513,0.006059545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8400942,0.03349284,0.0051023234,0.0136838555,0.09027302,0.017353699],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03476416,0.0012171675,0.001651673,0.010852793,0.008743553,0.026582003,0.009515401,0.022123598,0.12318826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14665599,0.0010950128,0.002067434,0.019053314,0.004968618,0.025639946,0.009975416,0.01743286,0.056833677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014537562,0.000029428416,0.0001984802,0.00034515598,0.0000071917507,0.00006777278,0.00022879643,0.00006673173,0.00006333387,0.0495491,0.9111672,0.038262393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001719381,0.0000018185707,0.00016622244,0.0001999179,0.0000025679437,0.000018893714,0.00004480148,0.000012474127,0.00002109248,0.0008044461,0.99872017,0.0000059902454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23308323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18878981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036116913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107172966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598584067","doi":"10.11575/prism/29747","title":"One year (almost) with the Open Access Authors Fund","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trust fund; Presentation (obstetrics); Business; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.4905294365897821,"score_gpt":0.49107287069680167,"score_spread":0.0005434341070195692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598584067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014697381,0.02133984,0.011562301,0.1381828,0.17752327,0.0009369904,0.0044923495,0.0040811626,0.62718385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015384892,0.0020112945,0.0028033005,0.0054564886,0.007600202,0.00015376201,0.0009585074,0.00060848315,0.965023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905703,0.00070116686,0.00045537116,0.0011777236,0.0055990308,0.0014964332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674672,0.0020041624,0.0032536893,0.004679766,0.011594395,0.011000798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924633,0.000625237,0.0007588714,0.002905907,0.0028059538,0.0149725145,0.0014538593,0.005275633,0.15758291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032695983,0.00043953554,0.000641675,0.0040601934,0.0023946443,0.00545509,0.0074948017,0.004541578,0.10910798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015234717,0.000088156135,0.0015671328,0.00022212218,0.00002880524,0.00029581328,0.0005214687,0.00005718186,0.0016162946,0.032264788,0.77343756,0.1897483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063243024,0.000015592297,0.0007015975,0.000039182807,0.0000044765134,0.000087791734,0.00011595673,0.000017695449,0.00018404685,0.00045000814,0.99837023,0.0000071246145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060822708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008746422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00497469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011004911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600077369","doi":"10.1002/bult.2012.1720380605","title":"The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Citation; Information science; Data science; Library science; Citation analysis; Natural science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17308075906179352,"score_gpt":0.442839061113643,"score_spread":0.2697583020518495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600077369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07332656,0.1606528,0.0067852843,0.6718487,0.036760136,0.00005282445,0.0010076398,0.0003247486,0.049241282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7779966,0.08285672,0.011170269,0.058627993,0.057069898,0.00028086043,0.0010875466,0.00087406905,0.010036042],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98806816,0.0049674157,0.0011865225,0.0009911262,0.0043072603,0.000479537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73506814,0.15691353,0.023435589,0.007113694,0.067036435,0.010432579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031564172,0.00044928823,0.0010268702,0.0074565127,0.0016998717,0.012844632,0.0014616679,0.0017670838,0.0031912026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21532734,0.0003126975,0.0003204452,0.016322326,0.0037353756,0.014252708,0.0026083742,0.0040342365,0.00069019437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038640408,0.00012749694,0.04522661,0.0012919805,0.0001253363,0.00013439341,0.0120843025,0.00045419636,0.00030646462,0.08804693,0.35655972,0.49525622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004389023,0.00029112672,0.10671138,0.0037683817,0.0001218865,0.00023287318,0.012948867,0.0017585595,0.0007963104,0.030980345,0.8422085,0.00013787493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005291092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075714383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99254346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047661164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060805585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1669293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601970840","doi":"10.18438/b8n32f","title":"Scholars in International Relations Cite Books More Frequently than Journals: More Research is Needed to Better Understand Research Behaviour and Use","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Subject (documents); Collection development; Citation analysis; Sample (material); Impact factor; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5838780484821268,"score_gpt":0.5853591350904922,"score_spread":0.001481086608365434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601970840","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15142253,0.46592268,0.0072777504,0.28258154,0.008352879,0.00031010463,0.0017966472,0.00038101422,0.08195489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39166883,0.48606697,0.014340889,0.06720838,0.010760781,0.0006341929,0.0025535936,0.0006770439,0.02608923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748458,0.009367992,0.0024477136,0.002848035,0.009676977,0.00081336324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79366,0.14137281,0.0230298,0.0068386514,0.032476086,0.0026226991],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021752108,0.00056337775,0.0016215652,0.013404865,0.0030795815,0.023071008,0.0016483183,0.002367885,0.014692054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115394376,0.0006967902,0.0009858105,0.046789277,0.004269629,0.027444277,0.0027056155,0.0025594996,0.0045384686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006423423,0.00010712594,0.06833061,0.009745918,0.00038473628,0.00030890765,0.06258543,0.00009130857,0.001139724,0.019184811,0.101637445,0.73641974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023522896,0.000106822474,0.20141804,0.018834518,0.00035454298,0.00079274824,0.14442557,0.0002314974,0.0011791463,0.019180179,0.6132247,0.00022873798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008641764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024120959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98659515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005125431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053753206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1150375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1627199058","doi":"10.3171/2010.3.jns1032","title":"Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Index (typography); MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3416448425911635,"score_gpt":0.5519332360853685,"score_spread":0.21028839349420497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1627199058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440646,0.0064531034,0.00063407,0.0021160676,0.00013472137,0.000108939435,0.014530759,0.000120470475,0.031837307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923585,0.0015616813,0.0006447879,0.000079867685,0.000121159625,0.000023102868,0.0039327573,0.0000139174,0.0012642967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774326,0.0009855643,0.0008913432,0.0005085409,0.008774309,0.0010969628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172829,0.018367441,0.017500421,0.00129291,0.036901824,0.008654612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067728264,0.00051706913,0.00069838844,0.038731515,0.0022852914,0.004499174,0.0015058245,0.00046251714,0.0032268679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050611895,0.00020166146,0.00071182096,0.055346366,0.0015755204,0.001549006,0.0021917722,0.000529745,0.0004472227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026817815,0.00005583849,0.94958586,0.0003892035,0.00042416187,0.00014045133,0.00089642085,0.0010481776,0.00019794499,0.0013384237,0.0056965146,0.039958782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014957976,0.00005181092,0.9945825,0.000042382646,0.00008161666,0.00007954587,0.0011413544,0.0006591277,0.00017834983,0.00027325843,0.0028708237,0.000024306526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6425314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70476085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019855743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025471443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71914756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628131229","doi":"10.1111/caje.12077","title":"Incentives for Journal Editors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Selection (genetic algorithm); Citation; Computer science; Test (biology); Positive economics; Library science; Data science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.6173384028673773,"score_gpt":0.3755369723383634,"score_spread":0.24180143052901387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628131229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6503736,0.005084463,0.010468959,0.031700663,0.002397389,0.00052606524,0.00052599754,0.0005377566,0.29838517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96689254,0.00051193987,0.0022432413,0.0019516747,0.001377344,0.0001383412,0.00006979011,0.00003588703,0.026779143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847882,0.007376358,0.0012714829,0.0014092145,0.0036873755,0.0014673298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75025946,0.14641938,0.052722137,0.009513753,0.019939747,0.021145575],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015308503,0.0004706095,0.0006236634,0.0019799778,0.002064189,0.0073006493,0.000914659,0.0026751768,0.028696278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1478832,0.00045011236,0.0003881181,0.0011776626,0.0008742531,0.003299401,0.0022650277,0.0013960613,0.005352405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030762493,0.0018824157,0.44208756,0.0024177406,0.0005755829,0.0025164008,0.008977706,0.0047335937,0.014888124,0.14291805,0.10814974,0.2677768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017613831,0.001899309,0.3451604,0.0007477901,0.00066245283,0.004550411,0.012933377,0.018077563,0.015554493,0.17402491,0.4243054,0.00032247033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049424625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072416326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9846915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016767157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027331105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095998585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636682838","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2014-0412","title":"Calibrated fair measure of particle physics publications: indices to quantify an individual’s scientific research output","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Quality (philosophy); Particle (ecology); Calibration; Probability and statistics","score_opus":0.7915906332864164,"score_gpt":0.5712327260204231,"score_spread":0.22035790726599336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636682838","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22086455,0.0031059587,0.71715254,0.0040693143,0.0013378833,0.0007460744,0.008481616,0.0010740254,0.043168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80909014,0.00063786196,0.18249561,0.00033265192,0.0006436037,0.0006957734,0.0027414907,0.00012804904,0.003234652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843313,0.005550564,0.0016313174,0.0016796943,0.006345218,0.00046196178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89384866,0.05003089,0.01738403,0.01725706,0.017895328,0.0035840499],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027020138,0.00081719935,0.0010027221,0.018719621,0.0009953598,0.0046319114,0.0020148444,0.0014647453,0.0034110425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14184953,0.0002564562,0.00078338647,0.01726028,0.0028622958,0.0054223435,0.0030299027,0.0013444461,0.00111737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954136,0.00060719665,0.40534312,0.0006984506,0.0011229509,0.00021157433,0.003526548,0.022227125,0.0037116625,0.21251798,0.01592304,0.33361492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001711218,0.0011827471,0.35716647,0.00046894953,0.00047449436,0.00074144336,0.002154754,0.09929273,0.008502503,0.47685403,0.052586194,0.0004045558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096702325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014650758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001896533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002477053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1428979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1692430885","doi":"10.18438/b8k904","title":"Citations to Conference Papers Indicate They Are Declining in Importance across All Discipline Areas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation index; Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Index (typography); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3444022305402201,"score_gpt":0.5347875061949723,"score_spread":0.19038527565475216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1692430885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118700564,0.64302516,0.0044196737,0.057836216,0.013793686,0.0009994404,0.031328224,0.00075407483,0.12914294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4275944,0.495444,0.009155086,0.011191364,0.009983567,0.0008361214,0.02200567,0.00043628327,0.023353573],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725583,0.0041797743,0.0058331066,0.0019896005,0.014321422,0.0011177771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.804998,0.07677639,0.04562964,0.0044897716,0.064659685,0.003446527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02040996,0.0008320486,0.0015818893,0.06955588,0.002231047,0.010269591,0.0019702232,0.0028633482,0.019148247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1727456,0.00042366842,0.0021876446,0.15423013,0.001805174,0.007702886,0.003364898,0.0018334944,0.005246513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004061282,0.00014994513,0.12467422,0.04841412,0.0013005829,0.00051060924,0.004616447,0.000597884,0.0016433612,0.009944436,0.2607843,0.5469579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013616343,0.0003117399,0.4601663,0.021928936,0.0018303582,0.0015830288,0.0058598192,0.00048259558,0.002067167,0.0060627586,0.49936864,0.00020244379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068050884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013088124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97959006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004714445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077171647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10793948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722754901","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.03","title":"Do Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science Publish Disproportionately in the Journals for Which They Serve as Board Members?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Publication; Library science; On board; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; History","score_opus":0.3070951898295489,"score_gpt":0.47969082041121336,"score_spread":0.17259563058166444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722754901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96482795,0.009693688,0.0010902907,0.013744803,0.0013068637,0.00006890297,0.0004066433,0.000055949222,0.008804974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99052316,0.0033697796,0.00045100824,0.0020779755,0.0018628822,0.000055964385,0.00024600295,0.00003934561,0.0013738502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720518,0.012095273,0.0032553799,0.0028326083,0.00757361,0.0021913035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71236145,0.097115986,0.14086455,0.007765769,0.020267379,0.021624908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023483796,0.00029371565,0.000989706,0.0052159973,0.0021478597,0.0059514046,0.00077869603,0.0014803269,0.004334734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18250677,0.00040892433,0.00031998055,0.0066871634,0.0017378525,0.004486063,0.0016371328,0.000909955,0.0022897655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030234724,0.000086981716,0.9323238,0.00030807478,0.00020853415,0.00022106615,0.0031556815,0.00004160926,0.00052681187,0.00062429573,0.007468628,0.05473213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077388504,0.00027444403,0.96340233,0.00035342504,0.00017514238,0.0015580748,0.01191096,0.00024346323,0.0007009197,0.0014843998,0.019783707,0.000035820256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015602495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023115922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092501903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019495924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124195695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750323602","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of Iranian Scientists Productions in Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology based on ISI through 2000 to 2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Biotechnology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.8058859249098295,"score_gpt":0.7134467555489087,"score_spread":0.09243916936092078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750323602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733483,0.01977109,0.0008272484,0.0020211507,0.00026523432,0.00033204575,0.05455551,0.00027997023,0.04859948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591593,0.010467607,0.0021427853,0.00010838048,0.00018815995,0.00024527955,0.024838258,0.000033664866,0.002816453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879953,0.0010072053,0.0026012673,0.00055244856,0.0072463276,0.0005974646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702115,0.006578052,0.009453895,0.0006620309,0.012029145,0.0010653173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065315315,0.0005247306,0.00092379213,0.05189193,0.00067818817,0.0022968277,0.00079776236,0.0003089952,0.001785552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03295284,0.00015089079,0.0007549026,0.1021927,0.00059812894,0.0019930862,0.0011948518,0.00038592744,0.000695412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000543828,0.00015287595,0.71827155,0.0043778797,0.00046153512,0.00041086774,0.0036305457,0.0007567631,0.0010176671,0.0027166118,0.025774924,0.24188495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013965507,0.00009030255,0.9709103,0.0003016433,0.00014825267,0.0002980455,0.0024325068,0.0005523579,0.00066059985,0.00035827383,0.024213076,0.000020620046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010457997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010086701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99346846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003818174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042382213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0345425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766974604","doi":"10.7202/1032829ar","title":"Dérives et effets pervers de l’évaluation quantitative de la recherche : sur les mauvais usages de la bibliométrie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5883950721125247,"score_gpt":0.5286102148543582,"score_spread":0.05978485725816651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766974604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19991061,0.26626104,0.26843852,0.06908995,0.0027655424,0.0018185485,0.0049202577,0.0014082725,0.18538728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8224912,0.040605545,0.114746004,0.004637448,0.0019375327,0.001957784,0.0012488713,0.00078221457,0.011593244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.4867724,0.35607666,0.017157689,0.0126484865,0.12590618,0.0014385497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10903157,0.81600976,0.015510311,0.017754158,0.040805094,0.0008892144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2706587,0.0027175352,0.0033428797,0.017821651,0.0019517137,0.016380537,0.0027597123,0.0042874366,0.006044244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61332166,0.0012587268,0.004566452,0.02249051,0.009015281,0.012157039,0.007077541,0.00598276,0.0022121302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002580857,0.0004477549,0.064391874,0.013758874,0.007155454,0.000165231,0.00890351,0.00875922,0.0032224427,0.089880556,0.010796853,0.7899374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011276732,0.005286288,0.33194554,0.030201182,0.011549156,0.0019063969,0.011229027,0.044535078,0.03506566,0.28616664,0.23958498,0.0014024085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006261574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004775052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98217833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010195475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006714553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8994077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767272795","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5","title":"The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4652,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Directory; Computer science; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6780420299185497,"score_gpt":0.6098436100295971,"score_spread":0.06819841988895259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767272795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97148997,0.011935128,0.00034766868,0.0005822236,0.00004496038,0.000012851376,0.0034959577,0.000035444522,0.012055792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953157,0.0022548512,0.00014342989,0.000038764705,0.00009108893,0.000007749902,0.0017460427,0.000014873945,0.00038747533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575174,0.0011626354,0.00055129745,0.00032749696,0.0018494801,0.00035737688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92209136,0.05161574,0.014096744,0.0015294672,0.008873878,0.0017928719],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003984022,0.00027803174,0.0008128308,0.032136608,0.0005098332,0.0034736854,0.0008115194,0.0006783728,0.0035057084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05544736,0.00021920637,0.0013891099,0.04098197,0.0007914339,0.0034053514,0.0016972868,0.000476078,0.0006250955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034501243,0.00006545372,0.9700466,0.0004774608,0.0010658667,0.00022403228,0.0007559252,0.00042643896,0.00040198295,0.0009192228,0.0011362352,0.024135752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001101186,0.000106386666,0.9932458,0.00014165361,0.0005618414,0.0005168041,0.001364813,0.0011487126,0.00023628611,0.00036604353,0.0022880798,0.000012597341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071754786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010365518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093684904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021069765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1768967210","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.12223","title":"The top 100 cited articles in urology: An update.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Library science; New england; Science Citation Index; Family medicine; Urology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5106426958614512,"score_gpt":0.49985119378074205,"score_spread":0.010791502080709114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1768967210","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008575125,0.9691756,0.00054201164,0.00795778,0.004814627,0.000059736838,0.005354416,0.00017845951,0.0033423128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033036634,0.94292504,0.004557122,0.0031818177,0.00694133,0.00009819784,0.007449961,0.00008622302,0.0017235958],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932233,0.00066106697,0.0022787547,0.00062622235,0.0028979296,0.00031279319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95036,0.019372018,0.012304125,0.00082642277,0.015178201,0.0019592221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075155017,0.0015330003,0.0021535717,0.07063223,0.0009476683,0.008665673,0.0017315471,0.0020250008,0.005908867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035104576,0.0008053431,0.001761843,0.07615658,0.000962004,0.006427119,0.0017721596,0.0017925841,0.0032717616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033902942,0.0001250812,0.05133367,0.057658162,0.0013114945,0.0011063187,0.00064071355,0.00029865105,0.0010509741,0.0016792822,0.17142452,0.713032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010036096,0.00019104214,0.16989385,0.056066994,0.0029561303,0.010640599,0.0018444154,0.00064256904,0.0010549972,0.0031071587,0.7532751,0.00022673166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052500735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012886927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026412848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005467166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039746284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774927437","doi":"10.1023/a:1012761903614","title":"Investigating the concentration within a research community using joint publications and co-authorship via intermediaries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Statistical Institute; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9143610746626762,"score_gpt":0.6578600446631518,"score_spread":0.2565010299995244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774927437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817155,0.00051757094,0.00782329,0.00038867196,0.000018400448,0.00006512809,0.00027828253,0.000058941212,0.009134123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961319,0.00015678542,0.0028895354,0.00001507705,0.00003831087,0.00004812267,0.00014003275,0.0000102478425,0.00056986895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98376715,0.007544897,0.0015137041,0.0018478635,0.0043925634,0.0009338257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.670562,0.26287675,0.03769881,0.009545233,0.01342135,0.005895843],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013443127,0.00066032,0.0011933623,0.016595831,0.0023744972,0.010146888,0.0016661533,0.0016845376,0.0051185223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10677086,0.00050584506,0.00090810674,0.022122024,0.0023676946,0.012258168,0.005053483,0.0013404059,0.0006939192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011465648,0.00072872307,0.83787227,0.0007461921,0.0012477996,0.0007767151,0.018645143,0.0044145854,0.0072429446,0.029740965,0.0008686999,0.09656941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036099085,0.0017478557,0.7313964,0.0005125166,0.0025086277,0.0016313059,0.04916204,0.09610481,0.024864323,0.08185908,0.009563627,0.00028849576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021974214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022412818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98340416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017538179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002136954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109493},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1788527215","doi":"10.4000/articulo.2726","title":"Navigating the heavy seas of online publishing: Reflections on ten years editorship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Articulo – revue de sciences humaines","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conviction; Milestone; Political science; Confidentiality; Media studies; Library science; Public relations; History; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7042640301659214,"score_gpt":0.5961317496657306,"score_spread":0.10813228050019086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788527215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024626453,0.01811608,0.0004693996,0.94340086,0.028767815,0.000012312945,0.000033167522,0.000056954843,0.006680886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13877611,0.043499347,0.0038406386,0.66822493,0.11060184,0.00016387184,0.00014107357,0.00067187386,0.034080375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8845978,0.044443518,0.007978686,0.005644556,0.04546643,0.011869079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5365645,0.2439784,0.022139138,0.014743369,0.10013196,0.08244261],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15298437,0.00074423425,0.0014660724,0.0039298465,0.019498305,0.06972329,0.0046066367,0.019297011,0.006680901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27279928,0.0010075143,0.0012705389,0.0053331614,0.024557877,0.047626745,0.017185219,0.034859866,0.0038788624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110743815,0.00016127825,0.0021337706,0.0004980996,0.00005010176,0.00036867036,0.03047329,0.00009219265,0.00014950435,0.05947429,0.8401293,0.066358805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023308814,0.000056121524,0.0010706034,0.0005506646,0.00001314856,0.0001684591,0.016870404,0.00006736182,0.00008583945,0.014402917,0.96662503,0.000066184606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057575707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011616547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011628466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03385259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8090683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799284535","doi":"10.1002/asi.23179","title":"Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal; National Research Council Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Feature (linguistics); Data set; Feature selection","score_opus":0.39575441091135916,"score_gpt":0.5121693558521234,"score_spread":0.11641494494076426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799284535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83684486,0.008571717,0.084212065,0.0030309593,0.0005497974,0.0003619338,0.003021866,0.0009238139,0.062482994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901445,0.00061417144,0.007856848,0.00015222504,0.00045984687,0.00010023382,0.0006646352,0.000046223937,0.0010914308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98068845,0.004793447,0.0025164909,0.0020041454,0.009417202,0.00058020186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8136631,0.12972945,0.024719466,0.010894724,0.0181987,0.0027945405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013426625,0.00064631447,0.0017865075,0.012666011,0.0016751839,0.004077801,0.0011352568,0.0016880101,0.0026822584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18640037,0.0003160251,0.0007938373,0.0227565,0.0019646194,0.0067349058,0.0021160166,0.0010909723,0.001025065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009118633,0.00034798746,0.5696468,0.0012313377,0.001607262,0.0003242579,0.0025817922,0.011288076,0.004427476,0.02758288,0.010500839,0.36954942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017682787,0.00085259206,0.7928025,0.00029706326,0.00097133167,0.0013326027,0.001421129,0.0636891,0.009014348,0.0979549,0.03126346,0.00022410916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030353218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033885143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014877229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014344252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07100767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820939557","doi":"10.14288/1.0107439","title":"Open Access Journals Support in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Variety (cybernetics); Open access publishing; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8874758402458053,"score_gpt":0.7070317425998818,"score_spread":0.1804440976459235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820939557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7579781,0.004524166,0.00031433316,0.06444613,0.00033941198,0.00014931058,0.0024151343,0.000098337936,0.16973513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98574096,0.0015006798,0.00021992427,0.0024527996,0.00004189366,0.00002601244,0.00032831336,0.000020148836,0.009669307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883426,0.0008392366,0.00042568706,0.00064411765,0.0055154474,0.004232895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261787,0.010825579,0.0050744885,0.0013360911,0.023441536,0.033143587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003956728,0.0001911167,0.00055964343,0.0053688316,0.016394895,0.01254221,0.0019722492,0.0014791278,0.014350904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031151509,0.0003133651,0.0003174519,0.016438367,0.004635301,0.0037542274,0.0055733332,0.0025648347,0.0006506887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063348043,0.00045086542,0.28093553,0.000981911,0.00018813553,0.0037119326,0.13012736,0.0010461269,0.0012355923,0.21880844,0.11605754,0.24582314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017929493,0.00016135044,0.45558152,0.0008606153,0.000111691195,0.0005280386,0.1874216,0.0011219478,0.0007873074,0.01084023,0.3421317,0.0002747175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10774904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.297512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839866796","doi":"","title":"Constructing of Innovation Teams: The Way of Academic Research Order Rebuilding","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Order (exchange); Obstacle; Subject (documents); Academic freedom; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Management; Epistemology; Economics; Higher education; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.697789209047413,"score_gpt":0.6165843998804371,"score_spread":0.08120480916697592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839866796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12794153,0.0028953988,0.34146678,0.04460655,0.0020819344,0.0010616741,0.0002472668,0.0014570049,0.47824186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8610327,0.00081841665,0.11023905,0.0011000172,0.00022030139,0.0005956096,0.00014646504,0.0003791802,0.025468288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96523964,0.023222918,0.001238138,0.0032204778,0.004818694,0.0022601408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96251225,0.011083286,0.0037304438,0.011268586,0.005062823,0.006342637],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02505089,0.0006809595,0.0007934145,0.00663759,0.015948903,0.029490516,0.0024477944,0.003921272,0.010922503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040273298,0.00095556024,0.0015585545,0.0037795245,0.03440948,0.025554167,0.022071326,0.004639617,0.003004933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003804682,0.000059102706,0.00224067,0.0001586659,0.000029847233,0.00028996172,0.05244989,0.0006895295,0.0005684518,0.89612067,0.005582154,0.04177314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007741531,0.0000866506,0.0013356885,0.0003250047,0.000039910567,0.00032736827,0.03689687,0.002512459,0.00087115896,0.7452275,0.21222192,0.0000781259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025310835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002626911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074992226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01893843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13248336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855391563","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a39","title":"Build It and They Will Come? Support for Open Access in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Joint Information Systems Committee; Australian Research Council; National Library of Australia; Times Higher Education; Medical Research Council; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Citation; Process (computing); Business; Open research; Public relations; Access to information; Political science; Knowledge management; Data science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Information access; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8706319294959223,"score_gpt":0.7148403740911772,"score_spread":0.1557915554047451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855391563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7376068,0.0053337687,0.0015798724,0.13379586,0.00029638546,0.00009183481,0.00016688251,0.000056849945,0.12107176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143756,0.0027001488,0.0011867831,0.0025700105,0.000074778545,0.00003629577,0.00004055988,0.00001589137,0.011938022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940698,0.002011755,0.00031153575,0.00032938205,0.0023673568,0.00091016793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97832507,0.0058590067,0.003235182,0.00085784635,0.0031922641,0.008530588],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064029777,0.000093460716,0.00023091676,0.0017216523,0.0033191103,0.005685791,0.00085072214,0.0011591463,0.008281586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032968987,0.0001989544,0.00017110462,0.0025506734,0.0027407072,0.0059576165,0.0054030856,0.0016209957,0.00071056845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015350523,0.00032553976,0.119602084,0.0010326057,0.00006990982,0.0026675975,0.1662973,0.00046090124,0.003338479,0.16484194,0.040392105,0.500818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032028103,0.00028674796,0.36060196,0.00094606035,0.000046424208,0.0010563708,0.07888892,0.0013059941,0.0008438028,0.039035566,0.51685697,0.000099116056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035149205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05626828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99914926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043890285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014753781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06988925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855939199","doi":"","title":"A general framework for relative impact indicators","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Forestry; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3155945404928188,"score_gpt":0.5436566190987583,"score_spread":0.22806207860593947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855939199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031644672,0.0029959332,0.9774918,0.0013452084,0.00028380172,0.0003876321,0.0013794249,0.00076511677,0.012186626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19574049,0.005615035,0.7828217,0.0010260964,0.0009990622,0.0042893244,0.0025101707,0.000812145,0.0061859326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91540015,0.05501152,0.0052195587,0.010234928,0.012078782,0.0020551106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83741367,0.12706877,0.013393793,0.010583748,0.01053397,0.0010060628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.075092904,0.004702593,0.004097782,0.031627417,0.001859717,0.010825304,0.006594868,0.003490237,0.016980477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20119858,0.0018898282,0.007069885,0.04329729,0.007213284,0.019092806,0.0065416726,0.0064167436,0.0049990034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001021972,0.0000755814,0.006006093,0.0014953685,0.0008098172,0.00009429296,0.0011736146,0.02247196,0.00043295452,0.83795637,0.0046892213,0.124692425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007884916,0.00025905127,0.006615652,0.00066545483,0.0003908727,0.00023000297,0.000626631,0.03563991,0.00071200967,0.9025415,0.052062117,0.00017785003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008054685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004357406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063560037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054944805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.397134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858021180","doi":"10.15190/d.2015.42","title":"An updated h-index measures both the primary and total scientific output of a researcher","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discoveries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Occupational Cancer Research Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"Moonshot Research and Development Program; Hyundai Hope On Wheels; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Cancer Institute; Central Drug Research Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Vetenskapsrådet; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS; Laura and John Arnold Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; AIM at Melanoma; Centrum för idrottsforskning; AFA Försäkring; National Institutes of Health; Lady Tata Memorial Trust; Gabrielle's Angel Foundation for Cancer Research; Kansas Bioscience Authority; National Health and Medical Research Council; Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment; RWTH Aachen University; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation; Hope Foundation; Barncancerfonden; RGK Foundation; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Medical Research Council","keywords":"Index (typography); Value (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Position (finance); Minor (academic); Library science; Operations research; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.5557367665381472,"score_gpt":0.5299322736010783,"score_spread":0.02580449293706888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858021180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43985254,0.023470188,0.2585245,0.008996245,0.0034912177,0.002037844,0.035419416,0.0035661517,0.22464192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8740118,0.0042016823,0.096795954,0.0009230628,0.0015613562,0.00097522157,0.011421944,0.00035400022,0.009754918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98627186,0.002427142,0.0023462921,0.0012957825,0.006947877,0.00071106665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9045411,0.04473679,0.015197213,0.0064969626,0.024900595,0.004127471],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01613958,0.0012528403,0.0015581805,0.021583399,0.0013557122,0.005018868,0.0018880366,0.0016722613,0.007126825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05694163,0.00038128046,0.0015335338,0.018476095,0.002394054,0.007428798,0.003396722,0.0013416607,0.0024636711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093013735,0.00047467145,0.37969607,0.0029324563,0.0019136703,0.0005622099,0.0026954538,0.007874552,0.0050321706,0.032097027,0.05066851,0.51512307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026367596,0.0020309754,0.6230815,0.0013132736,0.0016294029,0.002232642,0.0069251973,0.03439164,0.015064987,0.124819525,0.18729742,0.00094968796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029228493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038935388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98386043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028497512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032580334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08535528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859296017","doi":"10.1186/1471-2458-6-301","title":"A bibliometric analysis in the fields of preventive medicine, occupational and environmental medicine, epidemiology, and public health","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Biostatistics; Epidemiology; Medicine; Preventive healthcare; Environmental medicine; Environmental epidemiology; Environmental health; Bibliometrics; Occupational medicine; Population; Family medicine; Library science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5681965202413667,"score_gpt":0.575281995445556,"score_spread":0.00708547520418934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859296017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79486203,0.03998803,0.020875562,0.0037747314,0.0005648234,0.005254448,0.08192347,0.0012219608,0.051534902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354131,0.013558825,0.025111707,0.00014736995,0.00058399787,0.0029183428,0.020170972,0.00012100422,0.0019747312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97489864,0.0069112363,0.0046385,0.0017482142,0.0110616535,0.00074176793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9327997,0.042986464,0.009866854,0.0022792385,0.0112524135,0.00081536034],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015334892,0.0011768249,0.0028637305,0.2069542,0.0018913562,0.0060898913,0.0011975386,0.0010173862,0.0045492416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086565346,0.00041735137,0.0039169868,0.26141718,0.0010597858,0.0046215532,0.0032530588,0.00061468227,0.0008714014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079310127,0.00039693917,0.6852735,0.017257519,0.0063290116,0.00094691594,0.003357182,0.008865492,0.0021640505,0.0062593464,0.019126648,0.24923031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014625935,0.0004325647,0.93851095,0.002022571,0.0032869244,0.00096694997,0.0051587145,0.019090787,0.0011085575,0.0057692076,0.02335667,0.00014981578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013989492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009252653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052340133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007367482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109963},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1860877490","doi":"10.18438/b84c8t","title":"Positive Perceptions of Access to Online Library Resources Correlates with Quality and Quantity of Scholarly Publications among Finnish Academics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Scale (ratio); Productivity; Library science; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.4063210639355647,"score_gpt":0.5072887019207899,"score_spread":0.10096763798522518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860877490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574006,0.0008783335,0.000057072386,0.00024382869,0.00001054431,0.0000081222615,0.00013124551,0.0000031130628,0.002927752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987612,0.0005404351,0.0000447333,0.00004873071,0.000026893416,0.000008180007,0.000092794624,0.0000017108234,0.00047535458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972916,0.0005445325,0.00039551218,0.00028899446,0.0011872876,0.00029192457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757142,0.010960972,0.008123176,0.00059851754,0.0025732531,0.0020299384],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035049303,0.00021603756,0.0003328612,0.0048127733,0.0009875642,0.0038154128,0.00047297616,0.0006199506,0.006213302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02061625,0.00022611787,0.00049578375,0.0047753337,0.0010534187,0.0018226174,0.0014970432,0.0003947643,0.0007887566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005569143,0.00010562754,0.9749371,0.00014515257,0.000064690124,0.00017885634,0.009991178,0.000035575784,0.0002724052,0.00010755227,0.0004034193,0.013702738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027569465,0.000045549197,0.99054456,0.000045082554,0.00003379497,0.00009257135,0.008326508,0.0000327361,0.00009043788,0.00005882487,0.00071543764,0.000011729907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00864287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00756162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089691626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010328877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02078557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866505218","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.472","title":"University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public relations; Work (physics); Administration (probate law); Scholarly communication; Business; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.6509815452259886,"score_gpt":0.6130331619322521,"score_spread":0.03794838329373651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866505218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210865,0.0026236693,0.00026406167,0.008735065,0.000048825772,0.0003250431,0.02317822,0.00006255689,0.04367604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98622966,0.0030587125,0.00040876985,0.0010782558,0.000016374166,0.00012058647,0.004680968,0.000022165363,0.0043845777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911131,0.0005674879,0.0005688034,0.000530611,0.0054770904,0.0017429312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698529,0.0029447188,0.0040667686,0.0010210014,0.014457766,0.0076568825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004770312,0.00019204228,0.00059123564,0.005707785,0.0076693287,0.0034753908,0.0021491027,0.0008551719,0.005161283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018711427,0.00042997545,0.0005107204,0.01878493,0.0017864931,0.0016674537,0.0026502889,0.0013146193,0.0008036489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076015334,0.000116629635,0.9378107,0.00027242865,0.000047466045,0.00013302587,0.014068554,0.00011797809,0.00023471405,0.0016824306,0.020191617,0.02524833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045269544,0.000019532052,0.9712705,0.000085289066,0.000012525178,0.000040850475,0.012939019,0.0001363022,0.000059079983,0.00007564499,0.015325388,0.000031288335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047669943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09764614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34587127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867326801","doi":"","title":"The Growth of Open Access Across Canadian Universities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.2949421788986292,"score_gpt":0.4187112687067069,"score_spread":0.12376908980807766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867326801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61839724,0.021687536,0.002186083,0.06898112,0.0009171951,0.0002264636,0.006899745,0.00046715804,0.28023747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611279,0.009273608,0.00166602,0.0023614364,0.00026586856,0.000039701947,0.0012374871,0.00010875725,0.02391933],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707937,0.001206169,0.00074214546,0.0018211748,0.019986682,0.005450119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9026564,0.009815974,0.008101315,0.003079574,0.047281273,0.02906551],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070693493,0.00041116806,0.0006340529,0.018335288,0.01173023,0.017062206,0.002556378,0.0017863195,0.010156553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037790272,0.00046659648,0.00072332635,0.043527197,0.0058629783,0.006013381,0.006805504,0.0021835451,0.0007469548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051613443,0.00019446143,0.18384929,0.0015443935,0.0001764683,0.0018094825,0.05299536,0.001824962,0.004336459,0.23102729,0.09917157,0.42255414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003609367,0.00006235737,0.5495447,0.0006940183,0.0000759103,0.000550999,0.029823786,0.0014367426,0.00096323935,0.007782554,0.4088151,0.0002144547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98399067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1507988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21770115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98495305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867868077","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0133061","title":"How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Work (physics); Control (management); Business; Public relations; Carry (investment); Marketing; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.8633871682852079,"score_gpt":0.5859746604823046,"score_spread":0.2774125078029033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867868077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106919624,0.016985893,0.025976619,0.6911785,0.011712532,0.00081811525,0.0029671853,0.001569052,0.14187254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.707234,0.02531192,0.07199174,0.10995183,0.010444502,0.0027738446,0.0029783256,0.0014699416,0.06784384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798284,0.009631767,0.0014899012,0.0014284166,0.0058801975,0.0017414285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9081182,0.0331336,0.016393693,0.0074094264,0.012521839,0.02242332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023338996,0.000528524,0.0015763247,0.0054922192,0.003971934,0.011790588,0.0009583798,0.004377999,0.06126147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122023925,0.0005213838,0.0015016326,0.008891238,0.0031292231,0.014624064,0.0055412995,0.003256041,0.0337348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030257565,0.00069935096,0.05772093,0.0028398815,0.0005450669,0.0005000532,0.0059064976,0.0003618836,0.001921416,0.023299327,0.31355885,0.5923441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042256038,0.00060235214,0.09018394,0.003352999,0.0006389023,0.0017607901,0.015933909,0.0010768884,0.0018500761,0.06401926,0.81983554,0.0003226927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019061066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002587289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026310808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069013378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20494002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868352903","doi":"10.18438/b8hc87","title":"Traditional Factors of Fit, Perceived Quality, and Speed of Publication Still Outweigh Open Access in Authors’ Journal Selection Criteria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Open access publishing; Computer science; Subject (documents); Library science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.7409162391392192,"score_gpt":0.6064956897708872,"score_spread":0.13442054936833203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868352903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96985394,0.00092851784,0.0072764084,0.0058581717,0.00028897217,0.00056431914,0.0004328681,0.00013790265,0.014658977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433494,0.00013743271,0.0039748764,0.00049408653,0.00019578259,0.00017057889,0.00013242349,0.000026733689,0.0005331788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9145115,0.03330489,0.015623982,0.003337911,0.030706074,0.0025156403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43244153,0.326567,0.14756179,0.017731015,0.05348966,0.02220908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0997903,0.00049661857,0.0008654081,0.0054037236,0.0020610725,0.0066145626,0.0014504727,0.0015527856,0.006342328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3057856,0.00046696357,0.0011385428,0.0054909247,0.0031188754,0.0059332903,0.003622627,0.0015225867,0.0012667755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035486938,0.00048921513,0.9487072,0.0005471754,0.00024434726,0.00021566777,0.006868994,0.00025783907,0.00055350916,0.0010989252,0.0019986872,0.038663372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011625269,0.00076291215,0.9810844,0.00025918378,0.00009014653,0.0005990882,0.0071568973,0.0012904609,0.000602097,0.003017687,0.0049375785,0.00008327624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001267976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022308952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018076126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036561012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52774787},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1869963300","doi":"10.1111/brv.12185","title":"The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Rigour; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Preprint; Scientific literature; Technical peer review; Computer science; Publishing; Scientific progress; Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Engineering; Business; Epistemology; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8049729065057509,"score_gpt":0.5806009134012404,"score_spread":0.2243719931045105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869963300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005495246,0.7404705,0.02733906,0.19579579,0.014153652,0.00023820187,0.000078867626,0.00021086335,0.016217712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18581158,0.709664,0.05123957,0.030030476,0.015497963,0.00055762933,0.00014679944,0.00022103147,0.0068309964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.852139,0.0902705,0.0107654715,0.0063577555,0.038295876,0.002171418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7821785,0.0957917,0.026598083,0.021318045,0.06829869,0.0058149574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.118827105,0.000528591,0.0015135859,0.005022522,0.0017474664,0.011267385,0.0038648022,0.0043945285,0.0009171474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22285968,0.00056648144,0.0009409075,0.0065417653,0.011732104,0.0106644025,0.003656685,0.006869683,0.0014703976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012588594,0.000049172468,0.00303161,0.011537885,0.0003271545,0.00020204652,0.0021894064,0.00074999616,0.0015073582,0.24813962,0.038830504,0.6933095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094322466,0.0001876261,0.008252377,0.014486481,0.00041191076,0.0008593758,0.0013475419,0.0013250596,0.0020000334,0.13190699,0.838956,0.00017229465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002922955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034680462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071022473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01917966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6284253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875784764","doi":"10.7202/1032813ar","title":"L’agrément des programmes de maîtrise en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information : une marque d’excellence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Excellence; Art","score_opus":0.3656115826860087,"score_gpt":0.5600560374136674,"score_spread":0.1944444547276587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875784764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.523947,0.009708494,0.14561155,0.045089517,0.00092507707,0.0016871609,0.0003232538,0.0014906512,0.2712172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894011,0.0022538493,0.071424425,0.0013822336,0.00050890475,0.00079902465,0.0001810713,0.0002496833,0.02918973],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9522356,0.024077667,0.0021300418,0.0023514898,0.015669418,0.0035358705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90360385,0.04746815,0.011123369,0.013105889,0.01576796,0.008930756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0418144,0.0009130016,0.00103268,0.006846656,0.005385985,0.013976704,0.0019634864,0.0027930283,0.0067256647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08241423,0.00057779235,0.0012026706,0.0072972146,0.0066939383,0.009256488,0.0125554325,0.004197013,0.0017608653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034844954,0.00081990485,0.036013287,0.0018019836,0.00015991584,0.00036794692,0.053249218,0.0018692553,0.0050156186,0.19794878,0.0048828335,0.69752294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020898906,0.0025829196,0.17294219,0.003547918,0.00027270828,0.0013102557,0.04763484,0.004909281,0.019101663,0.20501992,0.54216254,0.00030672504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033745305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004946582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008475356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017334616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22113836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877474545","doi":"10.1002/meet.14505001013","title":"Altmetrics: Present and future – panel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Scientometrics; Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16990887895704138,"score_gpt":0.44352388282780614,"score_spread":0.27361500387076476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877474545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019810485,0.017973756,0.038047194,0.7053163,0.037675366,0.0019729582,0.032258194,0.0061219293,0.14082384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.236374,0.03228112,0.2166622,0.13198265,0.051796984,0.010294502,0.12188177,0.0076775947,0.19104914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654328,0.015100878,0.0017377828,0.0023612962,0.013582944,0.0017841464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7928111,0.035935488,0.007693621,0.015778681,0.12844674,0.019334452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11211043,0.0012791107,0.0010577695,0.0075217783,0.0033418457,0.013113043,0.0033420145,0.004700281,0.03323429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091772236,0.0005452902,0.0017788241,0.016881064,0.0020586543,0.011869413,0.0059653623,0.00559784,0.022672284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020718608,0.00023336227,0.0040466674,0.0002615593,0.000040158764,0.00004126008,0.00024599122,0.0003745983,0.00067817763,0.00981216,0.860533,0.123525836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064651904,0.000142331,0.010882804,0.00085079705,0.00002794606,0.000057911933,0.00057508406,0.0016494294,0.0010350655,0.009753692,0.9748779,0.00008248854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071477825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005520734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99247825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050879214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011799347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59290373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878144120","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1502280112","title":"The incidence and role of negative citations in science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quality (philosophy); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Point (geometry); Data science; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.485203514959724,"score_gpt":0.5552463451501192,"score_spread":0.07004283019039514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878144120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98290825,0.005882664,0.0019519303,0.0023172984,0.0001659975,0.00003429664,0.0001925935,0.000050344763,0.006496592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987067,0.0005127592,0.00033741162,0.000055166118,0.000110270434,0.0000072096173,0.000054336957,0.0000065929025,0.00020966843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97616065,0.009246364,0.004492846,0.0023169953,0.006609812,0.0011734157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47761607,0.35464704,0.11687773,0.011617364,0.03255486,0.0066869096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028066002,0.00032486208,0.0008221153,0.0151710855,0.001649688,0.0054176804,0.0013588566,0.0020917521,0.0019106452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36082375,0.0002810302,0.0006200127,0.017656716,0.0042538336,0.0051512006,0.0025237869,0.0024934558,0.0003620193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001805787,0.000090670794,0.96522164,0.00022980865,0.00013535713,0.00028551093,0.0013782564,0.00039640252,0.0003107559,0.004887408,0.00046878436,0.026414918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027121612,0.00024622306,0.97205204,0.00025023174,0.0002420892,0.0024108735,0.0023724237,0.00296901,0.00070053636,0.015719114,0.0029373125,0.00007292979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023979773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023109645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019086311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016531352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14842892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881690606","doi":"10.1161/circulationaha.115.019564","title":"Results-Based Accountability for Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Circulation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Accountability; Epidemiology; Population; Gerontology; Library science; Political science; Internal medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.8184942742197815,"score_gpt":0.6221330884603833,"score_spread":0.1963611857593982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881690606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027482485,0.0005289111,0.00014562845,0.98964334,0.0070893,0.000014031761,0.000039429982,0.000022647399,0.0022418695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009338474,0.00069825473,0.00067953445,0.95273924,0.03142341,0.00010359682,0.00007510769,0.000037463255,0.0049049677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9134036,0.02809329,0.014398317,0.0070771887,0.030318836,0.0067088087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70964646,0.1799503,0.016730098,0.013730243,0.047600362,0.0323425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055609632,0.0010310924,0.003222438,0.0027659722,0.009226694,0.013912895,0.0042946055,0.08960156,0.008276579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25923732,0.0015265341,0.0023860831,0.0028142785,0.012859891,0.009654147,0.008230615,0.08501778,0.0058732177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007043113,0.00009421959,0.002535175,0.00009427513,0.000044436245,0.0004067758,0.00020059924,0.000100711535,0.00012133471,0.011445737,0.969356,0.015530327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054609985,0.00016734983,0.011743122,0.0015210097,0.00018000032,0.0007986221,0.00072423555,0.0033276286,0.0009779148,0.059219,0.9205064,0.00028867408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011804774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025556214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94439036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014860822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03298064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29409534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895862922","doi":"10.71781/13871","title":"Les fonctions des citations dans les articles d'information scientifique de périodiques québécois (2001 - 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4962446165082692,"score_gpt":0.5460042287327821,"score_spread":0.04975961222451292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895862922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512548,0.010924894,0.00078275724,0.001403778,0.00012755756,0.000027606471,0.02217985,0.00011083145,0.013187883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97563124,0.0023953794,0.0007296777,0.00006807086,0.000066198336,0.00003111418,0.0069137653,0.000039126175,0.014125504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986738,0.00018298517,0.0001083774,0.00021491,0.00060998084,0.00020997888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98127824,0.008071357,0.0021918004,0.00031815973,0.0073550916,0.0007853871],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029785351,0.00042716617,0.0005431869,0.009917175,0.0009354611,0.0034757871,0.0007165027,0.0007866822,0.00537463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01817788,0.00021363035,0.0005747848,0.016941663,0.0005640311,0.0012240164,0.00054236717,0.0008795224,0.0007594393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005058642,0.000054506636,0.8757013,0.00057126745,0.0009520602,0.00037373707,0.0047999364,0.005160745,0.0020280636,0.0074915406,0.019340612,0.08302034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005611294,0.00001098241,0.9902834,0.00005051017,0.00005768256,0.00005309524,0.00065124716,0.0011715761,0.0002505626,0.000113966,0.0073342077,0.000017095512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9446008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94737977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016198859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11753148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900908307","doi":"10.1002/asi.23568","title":"Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (<scp>LIS</scp>): Authors, institutions, and network structures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Scientometrics; Library science; Subject (documents); Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Information science; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.1273797801228862,"score_gpt":0.42389375027810616,"score_spread":0.29651397015521996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900908307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76906514,0.035581257,0.009685238,0.0058347243,0.0008835539,0.00025330918,0.10111879,0.00073653506,0.07684153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90739655,0.012965579,0.012491608,0.00049500156,0.00062194216,0.00025218318,0.0452856,0.0003003533,0.020191189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964186,0.0006267385,0.00071620307,0.00039505045,0.0014158537,0.00042745765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93172044,0.029098356,0.018702129,0.0028962668,0.014815456,0.0027673584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004423928,0.00038338167,0.000644226,0.043867663,0.0012716624,0.005873076,0.00071582437,0.0008634511,0.011370893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03735222,0.00028675512,0.0007247591,0.12525699,0.00059616996,0.0036837799,0.002022598,0.0006202242,0.003911603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060182874,0.00017665185,0.6812857,0.0041542426,0.00087910966,0.001285049,0.0057295393,0.0025003494,0.0034026632,0.018535886,0.098991334,0.18245772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006153569,0.00010970446,0.8589938,0.0009071592,0.00030242084,0.0011853192,0.004950388,0.00385801,0.0023951354,0.012178864,0.11493768,0.000119909964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009797804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018051485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023935863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025084037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038039446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902632898","doi":"10.1353/ils.2015.0002","title":"Studying the Publication Pattern of Canadian Computer Scientists / Étude des pratiques de publication des scientifiques canadiens en informatique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2445099569026439,"score_gpt":0.40792096221470864,"score_spread":0.16341100531206473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902632898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6789764,0.033870857,0.006713406,0.03266145,0.0013640856,0.00049127877,0.01212106,0.00046435377,0.23333713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389692,0.017009977,0.004666289,0.0012184628,0.00025114216,0.00016357258,0.0026489196,0.00013781997,0.034934606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805633,0.0020604492,0.0010359235,0.0013782288,0.012920187,0.0020419848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90876955,0.020350423,0.009756932,0.0025251433,0.051147517,0.0074504013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012213602,0.0004601596,0.0008048536,0.027146876,0.007656837,0.010658668,0.00154925,0.0009605185,0.010351232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06554736,0.00036051116,0.00064014766,0.07385925,0.0016684739,0.0025994033,0.0021644114,0.0011017696,0.00169891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039858805,0.00011366878,0.46432188,0.0029793722,0.00047744476,0.0011688371,0.052430056,0.0010399392,0.004948403,0.032301188,0.04386352,0.39595714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033618533,0.00010342219,0.6977492,0.0009237324,0.00026737573,0.000658846,0.039490737,0.0014041649,0.0023671985,0.0032326637,0.25352776,0.00024123785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8038663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8535683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031861134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081400126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39457744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903266278","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v3i1.54","title":"Open Access to Research. Changing Researcher Behavior Through University and Funder Mandates.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Publish or perish; Order (exchange); Computer science; Political science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Open science; Business; World Wide Web; Publishing; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9088351936069975,"score_gpt":0.6643610912524123,"score_spread":0.24447410235458522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903266278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03995911,0.01944,0.03554376,0.3950141,0.0038948604,0.00097231386,0.00068337074,0.0011002703,0.5033921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81836706,0.006081337,0.022942018,0.10514558,0.004209869,0.0032093124,0.00035660082,0.0007969261,0.0388912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6871521,0.23744887,0.010627706,0.012504776,0.044210292,0.008056242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41616493,0.3741622,0.06318903,0.0724534,0.026447214,0.047583215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20147203,0.00048130366,0.000843725,0.005542432,0.009377353,0.01802868,0.0036831568,0.010939505,0.02729002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4372355,0.0009150878,0.0010179674,0.0068398607,0.04152276,0.026779298,0.031612236,0.00726773,0.003921702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015219148,0.00019119919,0.017763149,0.00083545665,0.00009778619,0.00024843644,0.03248189,0.00028357573,0.00048558714,0.724561,0.07872479,0.14417496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016289296,0.00022668966,0.019271806,0.0016403071,0.00005706564,0.00080403,0.012599896,0.00064893876,0.00033385743,0.47086135,0.4932544,0.00013877555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032006388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00407717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99631685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008088349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034270868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98472714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905893694","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12294","title":"A New Method for Identifying Recombinations of Existing Knowledge Associated with High‐Impact Innovation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Army Research Laboratory","keywords":"Computer science; Variance (accounting); Work (physics); Data science; Field (mathematics); Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.80167535965227,"score_gpt":0.6487605366471354,"score_spread":0.1529148230051346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905893694","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11058413,0.00076146243,0.86865443,0.0006492857,0.00016784132,0.0011746633,0.0047007916,0.0012410735,0.012066347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45208058,0.00043337268,0.5393532,0.000090342044,0.00014512235,0.0019444674,0.0027609807,0.00017747439,0.0030144216],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98671395,0.0039685783,0.0018803568,0.0029941222,0.0039627957,0.00048016617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93363816,0.041545272,0.010618977,0.007539554,0.005759393,0.00089870056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011782845,0.00090931583,0.0009451457,0.030966405,0.0017076154,0.00493739,0.0015271942,0.0014857111,0.0053750887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08976186,0.00048063198,0.0014646574,0.025651215,0.0016276799,0.005347277,0.0031420502,0.0016482241,0.0011864931],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005539762,0.00038113137,0.33412933,0.0011885434,0.0013266318,0.000464552,0.0061013917,0.009620185,0.01279686,0.074708104,0.0065143206,0.55221486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002988802,0.00073285244,0.38976926,0.000645716,0.0010812389,0.0036432892,0.005992258,0.29917994,0.022705877,0.19788095,0.07718278,0.0008869887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00674876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015758069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002658937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06231433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908469110","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01645.x","title":"Distortions, belief and sense making in complex adaptive systems for health","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Complex adaptive system; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8609314448727596,"score_gpt":0.7424440290769706,"score_spread":0.11848741579578903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908469110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3859705,0.0113534825,0.35993376,0.087289385,0.00057489495,0.00054791867,0.00044255206,0.00033757256,0.15354997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784167,0.00071947166,0.018868342,0.0005498968,0.00008895424,0.00015709558,0.000050199702,0.0000233079,0.0011260303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819287,0.011113627,0.0008752046,0.002265403,0.0027195285,0.0010974988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572615,0.030586852,0.0040469808,0.0037976352,0.0024833907,0.0018236996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019293578,0.0008529368,0.0012381445,0.003349704,0.0031995832,0.012827934,0.0024024565,0.0046914844,0.004386283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055947877,0.0007524689,0.0013573897,0.002414377,0.03302975,0.013111051,0.010581041,0.003929651,0.00038339573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013096766,0.00006731487,0.007887575,0.0002855718,0.0002021937,0.0006304228,0.02919057,0.0215174,0.0007658647,0.91639256,0.0009981261,0.02193142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017698163,0.000043194323,0.0021064887,0.00008435329,0.000020192498,0.00012795113,0.004317892,0.016238479,0.00013498233,0.9736434,0.0032180182,0.000047425525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006551261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003089316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019293578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00874624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043999855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1020354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917016740","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.015","title":"Endorsing and implementing reporting guidelines in journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Political science","score_opus":0.9235592772261059,"score_gpt":0.7493002681286454,"score_spread":0.1742590090974605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917016740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001149068,0.0008667254,0.0051562255,0.9720641,0.015040136,0.0003094272,0.00007591501,0.00023970731,0.0050985916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013875036,0.0008123366,0.03452418,0.9211169,0.022183595,0.0009153398,0.00018621075,0.00018298582,0.0062034805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.46337658,0.18458991,0.17054439,0.015183891,0.14081189,0.025493428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13104174,0.47124565,0.08344959,0.05620524,0.22223832,0.03581949],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34750673,0.0015685756,0.0041542766,0.0058918255,0.0125354845,0.026503604,0.014059152,0.13203958,0.0044268603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7093737,0.0039507546,0.0047835303,0.007986623,0.021812847,0.019183645,0.013630648,0.11765888,0.0062957015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008630886,0.00036554167,0.005675673,0.00083507906,0.00017583548,0.0015205665,0.0037246584,0.00046074958,0.0015710458,0.030254008,0.9043902,0.050940316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035366343,0.00039173377,0.013522486,0.005602983,0.000297084,0.0022309476,0.0043065846,0.003660956,0.0036789507,0.07518434,0.8900546,0.0007156786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011004459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01858686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65249324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012153603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07651752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80464035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920686816","doi":"10.18438/b8vk58","title":"The Majority of High-Impact Science Journals Would Accept Manuscripts Derived from Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling frame; Library science; Web of science; Phone; Impact factor; Population; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE; Environmental health","score_opus":0.520167877726737,"score_gpt":0.5899624590950734,"score_spread":0.06979458136833638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920686816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2639263,0.039448403,0.016748615,0.09583546,0.029937247,0.004860248,0.025510872,0.0056442753,0.5180887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40488282,0.044035472,0.026989559,0.03378017,0.020679768,0.0028986984,0.014048406,0.0015851316,0.45110002],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860394,0.00249312,0.0019567502,0.00084153604,0.0076952158,0.0009739828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8405126,0.039555866,0.024768531,0.013790301,0.060162224,0.021210412],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023090389,0.00071128627,0.0011746795,0.00665844,0.003221703,0.012652369,0.0018750294,0.0021258076,0.07723647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088020936,0.0006606294,0.0010170504,0.010640457,0.0018835632,0.0052493783,0.0046931393,0.0010730865,0.068677224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072996266,0.0008284191,0.057398643,0.0035180943,0.00014274014,0.000752248,0.0030485024,0.00019081599,0.012019971,0.009384162,0.4164934,0.49549305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020917617,0.0005992532,0.06286262,0.001411853,0.000059217033,0.0008966709,0.003997142,0.0002446161,0.0044180457,0.0037888424,0.9214095,0.000103099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074398925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017038228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99812496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018571386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007966248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25838172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923296844","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v34i1.183446","title":"Assessing Outcomes of Long-Term Research Collaboration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6487901424752449,"score_gpt":0.6671789705501356,"score_spread":0.01838882807489073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923296844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903403,0.00063220493,0.0018525781,0.0005598648,0.000045021272,0.000099594894,0.000370244,0.000036154226,0.006064099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980083,0.000177512,0.0007573459,0.000033457978,0.000044838038,0.00011951441,0.0003457763,0.0000068039258,0.0005064049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.960959,0.019328756,0.0053485413,0.0017706093,0.011010022,0.0015830657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55006266,0.16964507,0.17985375,0.017004423,0.05655503,0.026879057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043949194,0.0004201807,0.0008024402,0.0060787383,0.0020659892,0.004424944,0.0011535612,0.001604242,0.0022462297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20650017,0.0001930872,0.0008216172,0.005224022,0.0015038657,0.005150829,0.0063075316,0.0015237718,0.00071297376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006209109,0.0006607079,0.93245566,0.0003345199,0.0005439605,0.00023474143,0.007732462,0.00083156023,0.0007993094,0.00089001836,0.00043973094,0.05445641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004451534,0.0019697365,0.97846437,0.00014379626,0.0001859267,0.00039102303,0.010408022,0.0013749684,0.0014130529,0.0031195253,0.0023925942,0.000092518516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007964214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012636659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016155251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025526262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23242837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924001847","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v37i1.183544","title":"Predicting Individual Research Productivity: More than a Question of Time","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Exploratory research; Perception; Socialization; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Higher education; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Economics; Business; Economic growth","score_opus":0.5048919024519153,"score_gpt":0.5947720797289903,"score_spread":0.08988017727707498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924001847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930265,0.0006906985,0.0016008018,0.0007700689,0.00002895974,0.00002498286,0.00017833762,0.000018886256,0.0036607843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814737,0.00024806225,0.0008769454,0.00009990967,0.00002917809,0.000019771504,0.0001313403,0.000007818928,0.00043964488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943845,0.0021381604,0.0006485789,0.00070034264,0.0016514853,0.00047694636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8969897,0.06281485,0.022176053,0.0043274043,0.0046029957,0.009089094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008905527,0.00024179003,0.00035434376,0.0026341584,0.0007839646,0.0026221552,0.000975567,0.0006463077,0.0026568118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039886776,0.00017561641,0.0004708556,0.0031537947,0.0013130147,0.0023168724,0.0011509192,0.00062190945,0.000511179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054339416,0.00016027193,0.9741858,0.000071120376,0.00014327373,0.00006209344,0.0034927842,0.00030414035,0.0003062228,0.0003505724,0.00042599664,0.020443432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009481928,0.00015114028,0.9910323,0.000049754814,0.000029714945,0.00010387572,0.004643962,0.00097644154,0.00015996727,0.0010956416,0.0017270347,0.000020520107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063014883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070889196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99905866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009413411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012633607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047097504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924177084","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05112.x","title":"Scientific productivity of OECD countries in dermatology journals within the last 10‐year period","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Productivity; Medicine; Population; Index (typography); Demography; Bibliometrics; Geography; Library science; Economic growth; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.3084683078737993,"score_gpt":0.5300698606143887,"score_spread":0.22160155274058935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924177084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616536,0.07337637,0.0003503771,0.00421597,0.00075472106,0.0001037269,0.029182887,0.00020277275,0.030159622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195324,0.039095502,0.0010155491,0.00069856923,0.0010645044,0.00011955615,0.012648485,0.000039489893,0.0033651232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964306,0.0005322596,0.00092808064,0.00034826002,0.001323903,0.0004370163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95524096,0.0083533665,0.021347392,0.0009562434,0.010682433,0.0034195571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004634051,0.00043584802,0.0006023642,0.020136058,0.00067130756,0.00380969,0.00048456376,0.00045267216,0.0031009745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02082932,0.000119895696,0.00072269345,0.028199347,0.00070236216,0.0015562796,0.0014964916,0.00035506522,0.0010630175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003679189,0.00007212338,0.90209377,0.0022308026,0.0006658085,0.001582951,0.0016756112,0.00068966206,0.00075490394,0.0010194052,0.015325036,0.073521964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001884945,0.00007675764,0.96174353,0.00059499394,0.00022752363,0.0012330959,0.0027358239,0.00018974593,0.00051113986,0.00029876345,0.032344725,0.000025081637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006220903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00410219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022275215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003649385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024507523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931366832","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.478","title":"International Development and Research Capacities: Increasing Access to African Scholarly Publishing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Promotion (chess); Political science; Electronic publishing; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.6028846712778199,"score_gpt":0.5822783616696274,"score_spread":0.02060630960819243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931366832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3441736,0.009894304,0.004190915,0.07725381,0.00026620217,0.00010360424,0.00020100626,0.00012047392,0.56379604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98538697,0.0033788676,0.0019588536,0.0012605608,0.00013240924,0.000032376007,0.000044583507,0.00002216988,0.007783218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634875,0.005817578,0.0006607979,0.0007802165,0.004013229,0.0023795268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94774216,0.025495132,0.008814815,0.0041410895,0.0065048276,0.0073019844],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010254422,0.0002631638,0.0002780882,0.0069044954,0.007284514,0.016637938,0.0012887389,0.001605404,0.014991606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06294175,0.00022483572,0.00022911053,0.009877164,0.009453728,0.014889708,0.013481637,0.0017785474,0.0008619903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010129581,0.00011213739,0.041581728,0.00062175957,0.000033410088,0.0010711956,0.120363645,0.00039704095,0.0018205679,0.56118536,0.013372717,0.2593392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004168164,0.00008157865,0.041559808,0.0014495755,0.000053707725,0.0015857294,0.12982236,0.00046201193,0.001846411,0.09541023,0.7276129,0.00007386573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022849321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030511297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008686749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023020294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063027084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931854307","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.cs/0606079","title":"Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Scholarly communication; Discipline; Confounding; Bibliometrics; Metadata; Citation analysis; Causality (physics); Impact factor; Psychology; Library science; Demography; Social science; Statistics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Publishing; World Wide Web; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.8493212517455527,"score_gpt":0.7002375862259894,"score_spread":0.1490836655195633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931854307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941618,0.0018380542,0.0002127052,0.00023594398,0.00004696884,0.00002012776,0.0010891528,0.000024677467,0.0023705796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734604,0.00033364064,0.00010590621,0.00006776368,0.00005557284,0.000030892737,0.001362114,0.000014171918,0.0006840203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929422,0.0024142188,0.001119643,0.0010362251,0.001778981,0.00070878735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8551367,0.06568695,0.038561873,0.011507395,0.020493949,0.008613176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016524263,0.00031683326,0.0006113429,0.014623659,0.00079912925,0.0025492036,0.00072056777,0.00093220826,0.002472562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068637624,0.00022693409,0.0011606805,0.0124112535,0.0010779148,0.00346383,0.003124278,0.00072992546,0.00084021175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009576739,0.00019621121,0.9805095,0.00019411086,0.0011747595,0.00019238531,0.0016155633,0.00022791653,0.0011933254,0.00053782255,0.00095005636,0.012250693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010073577,0.00021550708,0.9978981,0.000013417924,0.00010972105,0.000042514814,0.00043970218,0.00013765831,0.00027141045,0.000113939925,0.0007371214,0.000010893256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004017213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051350705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99927944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007676054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006126652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08738977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937491128","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v9i2.3115","title":"The Adoption of Open Access Funds Among Canadian Academic Research Libraries, 2008-2012","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Business; Service (business); Institution; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Marketing; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6852905379186385,"score_gpt":0.6025800342344214,"score_spread":0.08271050368421706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937491128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676542,0.0028489295,0.00037700433,0.00576498,0.000051082945,0.000179551,0.0033128406,0.000076246535,0.019735126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876166,0.0029360182,0.0008313273,0.0006692423,0.0000313357,0.00007896901,0.0011408083,0.000024282064,0.006671509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837857,0.0014757909,0.0010055461,0.00092988595,0.009974483,0.0028285885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495052,0.00652049,0.008448997,0.0013331554,0.028651223,0.00554096],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007770357,0.00036064727,0.0006474788,0.011218857,0.008937355,0.009526903,0.0022605655,0.000977729,0.0021994577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045615405,0.00046868448,0.0006631513,0.023574146,0.0029475722,0.0031165904,0.0053217453,0.0013525757,0.00037448507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004178874,0.00019239172,0.55635977,0.001106209,0.00011024749,0.00072493363,0.2015345,0.0005502674,0.001540952,0.009571091,0.01682588,0.21106584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012462838,0.00007733443,0.8326547,0.00031564018,0.00007561001,0.0002115332,0.10758219,0.0005000523,0.0008406166,0.00031060234,0.057225563,0.00019375738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99773943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13471465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15837333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941175482","doi":"10.1002/asi.23418","title":"Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency‐weighted in‐text citation counting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Weighting; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Citation analysis; Citation impact; Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Statistics; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Data science; Library science; Combinatorics; Physics","score_opus":0.36826216302652676,"score_gpt":0.492080593318006,"score_spread":0.12381843029147926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941175482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21458033,0.0054582725,0.7561494,0.006247722,0.00044124076,0.00012655693,0.00046989013,0.0002642255,0.016262325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88066316,0.0017511328,0.11457011,0.00043518364,0.00086846395,0.00014165972,0.00031549035,0.00012176247,0.0011330806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97427464,0.014354928,0.0018764236,0.002482859,0.0063714064,0.0006398366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73896503,0.21721435,0.013512458,0.014714086,0.0141427955,0.0014512291],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04363978,0.0011430042,0.002074398,0.008248032,0.0018161641,0.008365721,0.0026501818,0.0021125798,0.0017050058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30390817,0.0007862126,0.0011455875,0.008725614,0.0047234753,0.01425965,0.0043634074,0.0039389115,0.00036242092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026254499,0.0001688614,0.040299468,0.00065226376,0.00061915134,0.00019618456,0.003214844,0.1213294,0.00085707795,0.58021986,0.0036180504,0.2485623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000222068,0.000052431446,0.0052586007,0.00014458159,0.00006232067,0.00007575754,0.0004518186,0.17756836,0.0006507596,0.8127049,0.0029115556,0.000096650525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003531771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022506316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99175197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027589498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018437436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23079199},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1942393901","doi":"10.1002/asi.23107","title":"In‐text author citation analysis: Feasibility, benefits, and limitations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.34927831880499,"score_gpt":0.5014277466597552,"score_spread":0.1521494278547652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942393901","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23756014,0.032478984,0.58337635,0.05032092,0.007890168,0.0025450944,0.0074975174,0.003144037,0.07518684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6698759,0.007210121,0.3068295,0.003474874,0.0028329373,0.0015201701,0.0023348676,0.0006720886,0.0052495585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86673856,0.09548222,0.0073095364,0.004028744,0.025648452,0.0007924825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3944707,0.45691648,0.02245027,0.032798722,0.09120528,0.0021586558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.117184535,0.0014485277,0.0016159705,0.011649052,0.0019841196,0.009766973,0.0036795351,0.0017729553,0.004553273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37104943,0.00054942886,0.0013856838,0.02046193,0.0023319076,0.013502938,0.002581486,0.0017739655,0.0022842535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009595688,0.0007381998,0.11583166,0.0062663914,0.0012434416,0.0003557495,0.005281198,0.0038549148,0.0027492053,0.03815378,0.02634036,0.7982255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050119567,0.0015526993,0.14993523,0.008855816,0.0031673613,0.0046768575,0.01680133,0.18575135,0.027258104,0.31422997,0.2863325,0.00093762437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050062565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041837697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020943047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034721259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61973846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946178535","doi":"10.1177/007327530304100202","title":"Who Discovered the Expanding Universe?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Universe; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.555241374166491,"score_gpt":0.5195925378661979,"score_spread":0.03564883630029314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946178535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05447922,0.18158217,0.002203612,0.62366974,0.007185428,0.00004159447,0.00048278188,0.000084457446,0.13027103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6090524,0.20840932,0.0020471911,0.099570714,0.013846983,0.00011073725,0.0005605699,0.000111275884,0.066290826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976373,0.0011143577,0.000075036696,0.00038717134,0.0003618642,0.000424286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991918,0.004264904,0.0007544678,0.00046068695,0.0013014165,0.0013004891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069882227,0.00029511238,0.0007316404,0.0022963774,0.0035607931,0.0064432896,0.00064927206,0.003614749,0.012014786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026494388,0.00031376656,0.00031065432,0.002617416,0.008683629,0.016755164,0.0026407246,0.003962114,0.0023098798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013738815,0.000051052684,0.023429304,0.00058204995,0.00006429374,0.0007659703,0.016122732,0.00017477418,0.00020871579,0.5326455,0.22796367,0.19785452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028260487,0.000039081977,0.010871745,0.0011356586,0.000045036093,0.00085365656,0.013788125,0.00020054495,0.00024186737,0.22154641,0.751195,0.000054638756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007883589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072572757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040597133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043672435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04019344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947240674","doi":"10.1080/03632415.2015.1065253","title":"Finding the Path to a Successful Graduate and Research Career: Advice for Early Career Researchers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Career path; Path (computing); Career development; Graduate students; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.892270086119703,"score_gpt":0.6038514188641457,"score_spread":0.2884186672555573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947240674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013648459,0.016815988,0.010724415,0.9113137,0.01734253,0.00096303696,0.00029360104,0.00082032615,0.02807793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16125044,0.056657705,0.15908778,0.49075842,0.013261006,0.0040129186,0.0010825857,0.0012789305,0.11261024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96241826,0.021504084,0.0024915277,0.0015467585,0.0071736495,0.0048656086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7902443,0.048554894,0.0056704893,0.0038384814,0.05235518,0.09933674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06823698,0.0010265152,0.0016132126,0.003500006,0.014039264,0.012066955,0.0057785227,0.014304042,0.030457385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1252933,0.0012895046,0.0017804039,0.0019481435,0.00568958,0.011311456,0.0122520095,0.018760523,0.014954269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113581234,0.00034641774,0.004999098,0.0012534778,0.000034182915,0.0024234995,0.044367384,0.00025030004,0.0012931206,0.003398323,0.83934194,0.102178656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006147209,0.00023652946,0.002326371,0.004243936,0.00003822565,0.0011717373,0.115308635,0.0002502319,0.0004914868,0.011797905,0.8638916,0.00018183555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011875341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037157327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93176305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008181244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04707843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36087596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950766814","doi":"10.1002/asi.23575","title":"The power–law relationship between citation‐based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale‐independent approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Universidad del Norte; Universidad Católica del Norte","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Citation impact; Scale (ratio); Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science; Geography","score_opus":0.3021124265811342,"score_gpt":0.4858847286269922,"score_spread":0.18377230204585804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950766814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96377724,0.0014326544,0.026282774,0.00061583746,0.00008415822,0.00020963358,0.00058204733,0.0001916897,0.0068239714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703074,0.00011603175,0.0019759731,0.00005002147,0.000110175926,0.000077868244,0.0002158144,0.000024706213,0.0003986088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96824807,0.01479291,0.0022285166,0.0041724266,0.0095808925,0.0009771535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6228593,0.29322526,0.049937915,0.020269971,0.010438208,0.0032693476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025931852,0.000891757,0.0012687178,0.013390247,0.0009326329,0.0033652147,0.0018872782,0.0012473565,0.00310768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20589596,0.00051626906,0.002623253,0.011808022,0.0042344513,0.004634878,0.0033453752,0.0018312949,0.001103622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004304,0.00027660545,0.9612454,0.00018207773,0.0021764091,0.00047115618,0.0012157665,0.0039760745,0.0011004006,0.0023564238,0.0006854489,0.025813736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072821786,0.000786256,0.9334939,0.00005937745,0.00037785375,0.00082829536,0.0008691365,0.049791805,0.0010812206,0.010926827,0.0016127073,0.00009975482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016254537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009467667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98660976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010010584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008316586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13714236},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1952399979","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2015-0049","title":"The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Originality; Scholarly communication; Value (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Social science; Qualitative research; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.2653638725223654,"score_gpt":0.46011301814876754,"score_spread":0.19474914562640216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952399979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5279923,0.035113636,0.014042011,0.06828579,0.0030824062,0.00062697456,0.0020635114,0.0015336266,0.34725976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98087925,0.00512083,0.004733903,0.001266288,0.00115074,0.00023519139,0.00044229373,0.00032012424,0.0058512343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8694347,0.06469708,0.012756451,0.00630169,0.04303611,0.0037739098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30178002,0.5180101,0.077181116,0.021174267,0.05995069,0.021903828],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08939977,0.0005044448,0.0011954352,0.043859325,0.006407867,0.027744334,0.0030179108,0.0028389518,0.01831882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5022194,0.0005351081,0.00053724746,0.06821108,0.011921675,0.02410043,0.013032058,0.0024437087,0.00372843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005567468,0.0003059842,0.20396715,0.004449315,0.0002983248,0.0012508467,0.06395973,0.00093987497,0.0007407728,0.17276631,0.047651958,0.503113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027543958,0.0007057625,0.40633085,0.011682957,0.00047198322,0.0030209133,0.11393869,0.0054563605,0.0016420943,0.13482742,0.32103395,0.00061351777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009071453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006871834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97225565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010826621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02738599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953706973","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2157-1","title":"Neophilia ranking of scientific journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; University of Illinois at Chicago","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Information retrieval; Scientific literature; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Citation; Geology","score_opus":0.7322136034264928,"score_gpt":0.6133548832507849,"score_spread":0.11885872017570787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953706973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91287977,0.0035674449,0.021413019,0.001769551,0.00029071604,0.00010741486,0.0031338728,0.0003584262,0.05647981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922334,0.00039146622,0.00357503,0.000042539497,0.0001433355,0.000027622305,0.0009112667,0.000021755974,0.0026535627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546695,0.0016467802,0.00031750964,0.00039404116,0.0016798918,0.00049472525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793977,0.010548235,0.0023613207,0.0014749847,0.00461327,0.0016045063],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002776265,0.00029081557,0.0008347271,0.02462912,0.0016210427,0.004855945,0.00047265098,0.0005417996,0.007349263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024630079,0.00015929952,0.00055420015,0.012350434,0.0008260061,0.0020026565,0.0016956086,0.00051386416,0.0015813044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018595502,0.00032672274,0.47238308,0.0013296109,0.0010844425,0.0007058124,0.00143297,0.011459838,0.006481029,0.1190178,0.026010023,0.35790917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025916685,0.00068955356,0.6188802,0.00047001612,0.00063757383,0.0015916651,0.004073293,0.120961174,0.010127462,0.20783141,0.034329627,0.00014890429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011992434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002808124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018878612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019690318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024585724},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1957687230","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.479","title":"The SciELO Open Access: A Gold Way from the South","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SciELO; Credibility; Open access publishing; Transparency (behavior); Open access journal; Access to information; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information access; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.5749072824000946,"score_gpt":0.6038623861155267,"score_spread":0.028955103715432084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957687230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002588526,0.013285149,0.01912248,0.8033268,0.02522997,0.0002564015,0.000362461,0.0016220434,0.13420624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100079104,0.038244516,0.0952931,0.5693206,0.030466197,0.0012115593,0.0014178085,0.0051865214,0.15878063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95133287,0.01444796,0.0062487638,0.0032859407,0.022025099,0.0026593588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82678664,0.03697449,0.008383346,0.040007062,0.046562273,0.04128606],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06702601,0.0010390818,0.0021038684,0.012239142,0.009934373,0.035258498,0.0029167775,0.012939478,0.01281699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12960675,0.001328794,0.0010587943,0.010351755,0.037743095,0.042857304,0.029268155,0.029128153,0.013445771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010437567,0.00006447759,0.0007439537,0.00122039,0.00004486578,0.00043172005,0.005365887,0.0001134422,0.001216231,0.55342925,0.30326793,0.13399749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021409014,0.000026058731,0.00061394746,0.0012519511,0.00000966352,0.0001650387,0.0013370457,0.000090062626,0.00025202552,0.114049874,0.8821478,0.000035152578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059959744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053794393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99708325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009108088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057710137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35447168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957715089","doi":"10.3171/2014.8.peds1488","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of pediatric neurosurgery in North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Pediatric neurosurgery; Scopus; Gini coefficient; Neurosurgery; Citation; Index (typography); Productivity; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Demography; Pediatrics; Library science; Surgery; Inequality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43494201368189184,"score_gpt":0.49887993718459184,"score_spread":0.0639379235027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957715089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041896,0.038945574,0.0025980019,0.0018440908,0.00013194427,0.00027795008,0.02046291,0.00028466198,0.031265307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98071057,0.009022324,0.0019898799,0.0000743921,0.00021229353,0.00014376175,0.0070767077,0.000019188241,0.0007507598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911775,0.001737159,0.0018645014,0.0007822007,0.004079629,0.0003589784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96380466,0.01270014,0.013475784,0.0011439776,0.0081440415,0.00073136017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063415323,0.0004604448,0.0012470239,0.078374036,0.0009738777,0.0028526657,0.00073352986,0.0003714173,0.0025147172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040004835,0.00016866578,0.0010077534,0.13281585,0.00085681747,0.0016738654,0.0017004708,0.0002507599,0.00037674024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105704705,0.000050805345,0.9121664,0.0015392248,0.0006891518,0.0002696483,0.0015928273,0.0013200413,0.00023282145,0.0013845323,0.0042096707,0.07643913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069074113,0.000044563778,0.9894247,0.0002587203,0.00014046607,0.00039258186,0.0014756517,0.0011546119,0.00015392777,0.0005274357,0.006404407,0.000016027469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028071186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026148412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045483867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00499539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055815578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959603137","doi":"10.18438/b8k31f","title":"Google Scholar Could Be Used as a Stand-Alone Resource for Systematic Reviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; Medicine; Citation; Medical literature; Meta-analysis; National library; Medical library; Grey literature; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5601701496845081,"score_gpt":0.5410592668661927,"score_spread":0.01911088281831541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959603137","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013781142,0.173868,0.021507142,0.13697556,0.043982014,0.03962347,0.42795065,0.0327982,0.12191696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017993525,0.3151587,0.14224586,0.050186858,0.02495401,0.111646295,0.25745204,0.020864723,0.05949804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92536044,0.022413207,0.02920845,0.0064010415,0.014113977,0.0025030195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69490665,0.16520329,0.03943733,0.02043196,0.068455525,0.011565281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07231986,0.0051225554,0.018133031,0.11052648,0.0024815635,0.021909023,0.0091664605,0.0133205475,0.2503207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3362144,0.005634891,0.00972588,0.113298096,0.005330309,0.02185897,0.019929664,0.008000512,0.16390897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025201045,0.00004207009,0.00028441448,0.31804636,0.0010486494,0.00025806125,0.00072253344,0.00018794095,0.00042749167,0.006019605,0.57712984,0.095581025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008579292,0.00017876526,0.0016005988,0.21751852,0.001254852,0.00028989167,0.0005467038,0.00033881876,0.0003512873,0.0154037075,0.76126975,0.0003892932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051331245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008519085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92768013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009834271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06355259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83740616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964238286","doi":"10.3152/095820208x331685","title":"The effect of university–industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: the Canadian case, 1980–2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Citation impact; Impact factor; Citation; Library science; Scientific field; Field (mathematics); Political science; Engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.7929027252031994,"score_gpt":0.6583639922991803,"score_spread":0.13453873290401908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964238286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85066754,0.010740694,0.00043268112,0.0048765726,0.00006616625,0.000064990956,0.0048039774,0.00006799337,0.12827939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328953,0.0022543701,0.00027102797,0.00007415522,0.000027635177,0.000016329279,0.0007295674,0.000008816919,0.0033287627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888182,0.0011770152,0.00044986905,0.00073611777,0.0057855053,0.0030333283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95531285,0.012015502,0.006859801,0.0011305586,0.017810218,0.0068710623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054080007,0.0004855787,0.00082214194,0.013467542,0.0062442054,0.006416476,0.0014902636,0.0008916541,0.003949254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034634594,0.00024050388,0.0008516399,0.03869491,0.0026656154,0.0018810468,0.002511799,0.0013811318,0.00038109004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008844176,0.00025021567,0.7583021,0.0007429542,0.00069308194,0.0031149737,0.0133033665,0.015921395,0.0011748782,0.06631172,0.020678103,0.11862271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057810565,0.00008097574,0.95109594,0.0002181488,0.00035887098,0.0005226629,0.008046125,0.0032693623,0.0006647046,0.002703508,0.03287577,0.0001062403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98913443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112492345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11295302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8161929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965304071","doi":"10.1890/090048","title":"Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Population ecology; Ecology; Transparency (behavior); Population; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2267073699088513,"score_gpt":0.4591595438825929,"score_spread":0.2324521739737416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965304071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92696637,0.055894263,0.0011662381,0.005257063,0.00036200142,0.00031122097,0.0018472481,0.00004852402,0.008147067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94415,0.044061832,0.003068701,0.001454367,0.0006891364,0.00032943382,0.0010577103,0.000030108196,0.00515883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324734,0.0066923257,0.0030803112,0.0011301342,0.005435351,0.00041454186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90159357,0.040763646,0.030681431,0.0019239807,0.0216961,0.003341229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012838795,0.00022610342,0.000702056,0.008566414,0.00077432697,0.0023546126,0.00060751726,0.0006067346,0.0012285425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07709502,0.00024334002,0.00023347931,0.010060102,0.00036154612,0.0022466274,0.0009284304,0.0003840249,0.00060965115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026147123,0.0001656836,0.6166655,0.0042233625,0.00026126238,0.0011132549,0.027718786,0.00006921008,0.0021046374,0.0005299645,0.019745434,0.32714137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030066656,0.00026457608,0.8828862,0.0012583075,0.00014526818,0.0023016867,0.023824736,0.00020859392,0.000685106,0.00030835695,0.08803692,0.000050252198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017781309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00427974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024828399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06789887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966005845","doi":"10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00434.x","title":"Citation Index Identifies Highly Cited Investigators in Food Science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Food Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Citation analysis; Index (typography); Citation index; Library science; Computer science; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.36666538248945324,"score_gpt":0.5368220584075079,"score_spread":0.1701566759180546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966005845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6449815,0.057999693,0.016128141,0.008651362,0.0030997854,0.001850924,0.048622057,0.0011315717,0.21753493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87031984,0.026698293,0.034654982,0.000854763,0.0028679823,0.0010545285,0.03349407,0.0002459516,0.02980966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395305,0.0011451729,0.0012639549,0.000516653,0.002776055,0.00034512236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679574,0.008787057,0.009782237,0.0017812977,0.010509486,0.0011825432],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077468706,0.0005688185,0.0011856667,0.036523864,0.0012322149,0.0035222971,0.0011453338,0.0013339816,0.007852534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039252207,0.00019599493,0.0005736869,0.0612109,0.0005562906,0.002334575,0.0020409836,0.00083373423,0.0037061383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038816116,0.0003211914,0.517345,0.0033369758,0.000478113,0.0006723561,0.0038895214,0.00058077165,0.002038185,0.013369141,0.11175155,0.3458289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006495774,0.00031822483,0.6910577,0.0010596024,0.00050121744,0.0014742905,0.0033174574,0.0024736125,0.0028255968,0.012671993,0.28410247,0.00013293147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027645864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00557632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013237081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023715466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04096991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967787540","doi":"10.1002/pssb.201140118","title":"My half‐century long relations with physica status solidi","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"physica status solidi (b)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Communism; Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Management; Library science; History; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.39764821511170856,"score_gpt":0.48157530069995524,"score_spread":0.08392708558824669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967787540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041855806,0.063261226,0.00304505,0.74941105,0.15190956,0.000028909506,0.00017394041,0.00017594597,0.027808877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10767063,0.07890487,0.0063053607,0.27764648,0.2683225,0.00037191962,0.00038313837,0.001103689,0.25929144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878513,0.0038643065,0.00062644883,0.0020565775,0.0045998157,0.0010014663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95880425,0.009417552,0.004380888,0.0018524161,0.009247553,0.016297298],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01346526,0.0011247065,0.0017315865,0.002409823,0.0071589104,0.015184199,0.0018435708,0.0057985913,0.016457405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040773764,0.0008212235,0.0010103919,0.0018647583,0.010787559,0.0119464,0.006224489,0.020234829,0.015064694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009683866,0.00009822715,0.0010846119,0.00034314836,0.00004205627,0.00040584194,0.007094736,0.00016690973,0.0010348427,0.0543694,0.89984924,0.0354141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007887652,0.00004776578,0.00036434847,0.00033811035,0.0000061589058,0.00043842656,0.0011970145,0.0001140244,0.00022453217,0.013777434,0.9834489,0.00003533204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061043317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007205228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046645356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005237788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071211934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967988001","doi":"10.1002/asi.10401","title":"A classification of author co‐citations: Definitions and search strategies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Information retrieval; Dialog box; Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Classification scheme; Library science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.45324412709551765,"score_gpt":0.5484433231515129,"score_spread":0.09519919605599525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967988001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4984876,0.07753753,0.24068363,0.012963162,0.00073006604,0.0073665567,0.048216704,0.0030028117,0.111011915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7403905,0.010362255,0.22052366,0.00077742344,0.00032305703,0.004814207,0.018110465,0.00030620064,0.004392233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690627,0.012716397,0.006851253,0.0019342465,0.007985915,0.0014495874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8546791,0.10694385,0.012983948,0.005057136,0.018747175,0.0015888228],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023899585,0.0011668502,0.0024919477,0.1362085,0.0027341857,0.011333687,0.0029095144,0.0021710857,0.003440057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14896035,0.00047841654,0.0013858395,0.13700849,0.0020863623,0.009142063,0.0034767485,0.001290112,0.0019533518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085592456,0.0003185201,0.23415169,0.0068346583,0.00081611273,0.0004262863,0.007504761,0.0033887199,0.0027143515,0.12879963,0.026584418,0.5876049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006589171,0.0008466038,0.3254854,0.011280008,0.0023382918,0.005744679,0.030068483,0.13594392,0.016941264,0.27951062,0.19020808,0.0009736636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061588297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064351563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86379147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051308363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048653875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12639457},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1968686188","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0033339","title":"A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Social network analysis; Six degrees of separation; Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Data science; Citation analysis; Sociology; Social capital; Library science; World Wide Web; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.7537439886594658,"score_gpt":0.5410086143231037,"score_spread":0.21273537433636214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968686188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331332,0.0048457514,0.015907437,0.005619224,0.00007457599,0.00005570589,0.00022424587,0.00008472985,0.04005517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794406,0.000631046,0.0008103858,0.00006603483,0.00008447966,0.00002020898,0.000037878905,0.000015613088,0.00039028254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855457,0.0077507924,0.0009318028,0.0025710596,0.0025640565,0.0006366888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7923623,0.16343948,0.025211843,0.009116576,0.004868491,0.0050012795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012499749,0.00036316848,0.0011344078,0.008258313,0.002573339,0.010802035,0.0011227855,0.0014769646,0.003871505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14001481,0.00041050307,0.0005296274,0.011046315,0.008107857,0.015540963,0.005952666,0.0012416921,0.00063519424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006853568,0.00022514597,0.45551997,0.0009451895,0.0012704871,0.00093479094,0.04773989,0.00998838,0.00413365,0.26550722,0.003531971,0.20951788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013437313,0.0004064976,0.4825988,0.00059651694,0.0007057933,0.0011837315,0.034012258,0.017726865,0.0023291036,0.42262074,0.037484825,0.0002005286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018616024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019854854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99174166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018634205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011775548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06610578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970372549","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122565","title":"Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Discipline; Citation analysis; Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Sociology; Library science; Data science; Space (punctuation); Scientific literature; Impact factor; Social science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7704361682673871,"score_gpt":0.5791235230802817,"score_spread":0.19131264518710545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970372549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94563395,0.0058760107,0.0046296194,0.0015968753,0.00008640973,0.000050313025,0.0004561888,0.00013058858,0.041539893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698585,0.000969763,0.0008502366,0.00004464318,0.00007287581,0.000018613848,0.00016193574,0.000017904858,0.0008782569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912629,0.0017431756,0.00074046745,0.00095390825,0.004620638,0.0006790247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9381414,0.024482729,0.016946971,0.0045802,0.009718623,0.0061301664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067728558,0.0004991324,0.0012520452,0.012328439,0.002025689,0.009619241,0.00069500954,0.001384935,0.007207396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04841962,0.00024009398,0.00073132914,0.021738779,0.0021755488,0.0050707646,0.0070744455,0.0014038486,0.0020355696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024566392,0.00027402837,0.84602326,0.0009390449,0.0009546559,0.000566924,0.0040975786,0.002632335,0.0043667606,0.017828343,0.0020082702,0.12006321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045888075,0.00029646035,0.92505103,0.00019782939,0.00033065732,0.0007446214,0.008659533,0.0018209384,0.0029188548,0.04522729,0.014634678,0.00007213901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009641296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013464084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014595232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012494589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035818756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970405099","doi":"10.1177/0306312710374130","title":"Evaluating the social capital accrued in large research networks: The case of the Sustainable Forest Management Network (1995-2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Excellence; Competition (biology); Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sustainable development; Sociology; Regional science; Marketing; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.6211380137896874,"score_gpt":0.6552401674890737,"score_spread":0.034102153699386295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970405099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98568785,0.0004111662,0.0009962781,0.0012522647,0.000008464221,0.000033487817,0.00020863327,0.0000064450883,0.011395461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985576,0.00019870696,0.0006312188,0.000018789091,0.0000084387375,0.000014160151,0.000110415815,0.0000016274555,0.00045903315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970493,0.0013141062,0.00013720503,0.00026974242,0.0007423242,0.0004874892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710481,0.01503668,0.007629595,0.0011989234,0.0031372965,0.0019494228],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007677222,0.00016346844,0.00020303496,0.005528552,0.0026988022,0.002875157,0.00068279076,0.00070184935,0.0013794053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034056444,0.00011220842,0.00022139042,0.007568396,0.002121515,0.004272184,0.0026746402,0.00049307034,0.00012639549],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038126163,0.00020177859,0.8342465,0.00017257621,0.00022969875,0.0018629826,0.017560383,0.0103461975,0.0009447995,0.04246705,0.0027099361,0.08887683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042943942,0.00018213938,0.90542626,0.0001746125,0.0001727287,0.00067982543,0.033098985,0.020950615,0.0014554715,0.01733981,0.020404084,0.00007247327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09157072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13033135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009910511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032918372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18207544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970475751","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.001","title":"A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duration (music); Variety (cybernetics); History; Library science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Art; Literature; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5442823854424196,"score_gpt":0.49369882529647185,"score_spread":0.050583560145947726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970475751","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0537615,0.6017062,0.028556751,0.13408902,0.020090325,0.0005544686,0.002055478,0.0010986008,0.15808769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5325236,0.3163368,0.020935012,0.023866622,0.028004872,0.0011696304,0.0016773798,0.0007570468,0.074729115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754799,0.005683442,0.0036577247,0.0048125414,0.0092168,0.0011495665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8116735,0.05141852,0.027464526,0.013274805,0.077926666,0.018241886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03419195,0.00053281477,0.0008014961,0.006289825,0.0028629452,0.008044534,0.002307165,0.0027994798,0.007806384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09023181,0.0006485914,0.00062324275,0.009268364,0.007944941,0.0051827556,0.005783366,0.0048659695,0.0036743607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053567754,0.00016175512,0.013247163,0.0048575457,0.00013380295,0.00035510102,0.007889746,0.00078473886,0.0025200674,0.115750395,0.096638545,0.7571254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020031683,0.00015073361,0.021981947,0.0016326316,0.000027265492,0.0004996463,0.000908582,0.00021640223,0.00075318594,0.005475222,0.96826136,0.00007296018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011730961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079580415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99371016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013094365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015781444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18082649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971509762","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0007","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable?: A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Institution; Publish or perish; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Production (economics); Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Social science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.39111413594857386,"score_gpt":0.43648218703860087,"score_spread":0.045368051090027006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971509762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27478072,0.11178168,0.07176261,0.42620328,0.010678508,0.00038086143,0.0010513493,0.0006276242,0.10273332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130385,0.039590497,0.015938446,0.007792728,0.015524034,0.00025633693,0.0004727788,0.00033375042,0.007053049],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91114354,0.053224698,0.006358865,0.007773295,0.018958174,0.0025414522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46440187,0.41080517,0.045565195,0.03146441,0.027729416,0.020033954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10082935,0.0006632193,0.0029242116,0.010179156,0.005359731,0.036377348,0.0017569922,0.0060328757,0.0065284753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38067254,0.00080937665,0.0009834372,0.026639907,0.0164928,0.031652987,0.0065481155,0.0043546227,0.0028040945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076545984,0.00043187832,0.10393908,0.0037706944,0.00063656596,0.0030751878,0.029062413,0.0024248555,0.0018069668,0.24438588,0.049861167,0.55983984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020818431,0.0005051183,0.08058457,0.004189295,0.0003451753,0.003420255,0.025868427,0.0043513137,0.0018775638,0.6570383,0.22136372,0.0002481583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065049407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005562924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98982084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029820022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062868358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53324294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972405173","doi":"10.1007/s10508-013-0105-1","title":"The Impact Factor: Just the Facts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Factor (programming language); Impact factor; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Nursing","score_opus":0.5018076595022666,"score_gpt":0.585251921673665,"score_spread":0.08344426217139844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972405173","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023269795,0.008294502,0.0002000305,0.036893662,0.9540826,0.000008215325,0.00005607638,0.0000415743,0.0004000498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00039620954,0.0047482327,0.00015627588,0.012878085,0.97992057,0.000014458844,0.00001891089,0.000032047097,0.0018351461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824876,0.003913794,0.0032400913,0.0016847602,0.008010405,0.00066337886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86226547,0.08191475,0.004616756,0.0038772144,0.040999945,0.0063258605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02317431,0.0050286856,0.008690447,0.009922748,0.0048607495,0.0149707,0.008260957,0.027232723,0.007994114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107471734,0.002618397,0.0035062947,0.006879629,0.009057074,0.00856409,0.0028298197,0.039003212,0.0069661965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026728376,0.00001571559,0.00003298843,0.0004229802,0.000039809405,0.00006053901,0.00002124574,0.000027071286,0.000034623245,0.0007705731,0.9933328,0.005214988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119349024,0.000031743817,0.00065139553,0.0016085228,0.00022514236,0.000297786,0.00012436685,0.00051346724,0.00023289028,0.008348441,0.9877687,0.00007829803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046231705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009558139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99007726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055949367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006881046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12255895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972804538","doi":"10.1108/02640471111141124","title":"Metadata assessment in e‐theses and dissertations of Canadian institutional repositories","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Library science; Data element; World Wide Web; Element (criminal law); Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.4750425197805155,"score_gpt":0.4923809298565076,"score_spread":0.017338410075992128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972804538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7860297,0.0100477105,0.008555533,0.012018685,0.00043849216,0.0018713359,0.041059755,0.000642776,0.13933596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187696,0.005786254,0.023387874,0.00071926706,0.00013257991,0.000583808,0.022979563,0.00021452305,0.027426537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486389,0.0064716935,0.005023928,0.0021332866,0.034995455,0.0027366611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7905629,0.024980694,0.022558311,0.011602803,0.14371283,0.0065823523],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039081316,0.0004682089,0.0010102142,0.06405429,0.011180129,0.016445855,0.0036914935,0.0009426008,0.0070384657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17252547,0.00053769315,0.00073640747,0.10756199,0.0043051154,0.005603539,0.008127261,0.001016659,0.0013387959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052186195,0.00017929958,0.45276925,0.002700735,0.00018849304,0.00046363825,0.051459808,0.0013686162,0.003801879,0.04326485,0.037161637,0.40612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042949778,0.00009682067,0.6005608,0.0025110294,0.00023451295,0.0004096255,0.06614811,0.0019922596,0.008930144,0.004558836,0.31421557,0.00029941858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8903625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070482515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13138974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51138884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974967198","doi":"10.1186/1748-5908-3-49","title":"The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implementation Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Vancouver Island University; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research","keywords":"Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Citation; Underpinning; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Data science; Social science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6583037772825364,"score_gpt":0.6445441319892308,"score_spread":0.013759645293305645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974967198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815819,0.0075309454,0.00046558457,0.00062548986,0.0000314507,0.000044253313,0.004326205,0.000021064541,0.0053730235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301493,0.0028732945,0.000597288,0.000033053315,0.000053058247,0.000058776524,0.0024325072,0.000009390415,0.0009275572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672085,0.0007143579,0.0007685474,0.0003993938,0.0010847696,0.00031207807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359357,0.022638079,0.021044556,0.0024248841,0.016378665,0.0015781762],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760642,0.0002141659,0.0005245251,0.040128693,0.0017067109,0.0035704954,0.00069259584,0.000496924,0.0016355554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047901496,0.00021472963,0.0004564706,0.056832913,0.001294161,0.004015355,0.0020406605,0.00062329654,0.0004533073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010587374,0.00006304117,0.93479705,0.00039701725,0.00013954865,0.00023800018,0.01710493,0.00035581866,0.00020963943,0.002603173,0.0017817718,0.04220406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046107143,0.000038137303,0.9833824,0.00030623632,0.00008087052,0.0002596165,0.006033689,0.00061730103,0.00033275448,0.0006958848,0.008229766,0.00001866563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029922334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030210381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004927909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055405716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059496343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975195640","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.205","title":"Truth or Hope?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Publishing; Project commissioning; History; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.599150201540233,"score_gpt":0.5600144062844251,"score_spread":0.039135795255807904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975195640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044018137,0.023360262,0.006633432,0.7864494,0.013605903,0.00004354703,0.00020273885,0.0001141541,0.16518873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64841294,0.027012315,0.007457366,0.21938756,0.013065537,0.0001341045,0.00033847018,0.0002183711,0.083973244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447186,0.008868276,0.00062160735,0.0017298585,0.0032770096,0.001031413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97625136,0.011493378,0.002613725,0.0035617189,0.0029512427,0.0031285698],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015831878,0.0005827675,0.0014448563,0.0015595698,0.0053928965,0.017528944,0.0016395809,0.0055014705,0.018573185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064978965,0.00026957525,0.00061070174,0.0016391643,0.04237544,0.021216346,0.0055600875,0.009060378,0.006560103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056017576,0.000023121645,0.0010258539,0.00020085648,0.00003759727,0.00020587156,0.0069383765,0.00007877844,0.00006265963,0.8030863,0.15405574,0.034228828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014242307,0.00002972329,0.00030969956,0.00050179247,0.000014177706,0.00033774454,0.01008884,0.00011878719,0.00008607751,0.6791128,0.30936232,0.000023835823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020856785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028857808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99844044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042748605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061426256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083727956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975272578","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0120838","title":"Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Peer review; Computer science; Limiting; Actuarial science; Operations research; Business; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8317168938297779,"score_gpt":0.5837133120449581,"score_spread":0.24800358178481974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975272578","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10271789,0.033331547,0.38101473,0.34941396,0.012638427,0.002863739,0.00082611863,0.0023879914,0.11480548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6711991,0.005548196,0.29069912,0.01400749,0.004628074,0.0018126944,0.00020783544,0.00052289903,0.011374702],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.75072736,0.18039566,0.015422282,0.019086441,0.029507509,0.0048608286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5715234,0.26195115,0.04662019,0.048679773,0.05375737,0.017468086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17128019,0.00089353975,0.0030720602,0.0030754867,0.005236072,0.011288952,0.0035282802,0.0044492856,0.009406465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4417674,0.0010626647,0.0010415686,0.003081453,0.0055389483,0.015600034,0.004855776,0.003491574,0.005657271],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030729906,0.00051383144,0.040839557,0.003710439,0.0006867734,0.000760385,0.006199046,0.008551693,0.005410912,0.15941772,0.116450705,0.65438586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283478,0.0013696263,0.036387343,0.0061231484,0.0005010329,0.002687143,0.0075566783,0.026120339,0.004945095,0.53322273,0.37924695,0.00055644364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025374999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005499436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002760858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013225977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90582705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976145974","doi":"10.1300/j111v35n01_13","title":"The Canadian National Site Licensing Project","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Public relations; Engineering management; Engineering; Management; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.5497505971394616,"score_gpt":0.5577429311832415,"score_spread":0.007992334043779858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976145974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05366033,0.009121307,0.006805244,0.098292165,0.0014155753,0.0017472828,0.023412496,0.0012321094,0.8043134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37975118,0.011224033,0.028852765,0.020457983,0.00040454927,0.001905524,0.030517828,0.0006939558,0.5261921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744397,0.0019873192,0.00055270654,0.0010488008,0.017643347,0.0043281913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95019,0.0024876166,0.0008062157,0.0023655233,0.033725772,0.010424827],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013807339,0.0005341455,0.0005439086,0.006816319,0.014296388,0.011980567,0.0032550257,0.0020210142,0.02610146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025768112,0.0005130686,0.0005809039,0.009226154,0.003604651,0.0028285524,0.0065586763,0.0019393769,0.0036977262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011222223,0.00018894575,0.016468639,0.00042483513,0.000030352565,0.00033293202,0.0026381055,0.0010611473,0.0007776835,0.14809921,0.5996773,0.23018861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027899368,0.00002656992,0.018171122,0.00016715309,0.000016860948,0.00006299512,0.0020983818,0.00047025623,0.00039101153,0.0023492305,0.97617537,0.000043058935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10771143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4494048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78150475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976755538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.221","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Volume (thermodynamics); Sociology; History; Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976755538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031115816,0.005785557,0.00058167987,0.9489233,0.03353599,0.000006253474,0.000036345926,0.000056981095,0.007962322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13740557,0.018835874,0.003914937,0.625022,0.14268552,0.00006654294,0.00012265574,0.00035714588,0.07158975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560475,0.0016728292,0.00031894,0.00069598225,0.0012964251,0.0004111958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730294,0.01400217,0.0025764522,0.0015166306,0.0055973115,0.0032780708],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012477091,0.00035743037,0.0009337977,0.0018751846,0.0042900043,0.018588478,0.0023639526,0.008186547,0.005482188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04856275,0.00034820617,0.00043755438,0.0025227186,0.00748409,0.011834358,0.0028645792,0.009098058,0.0018739448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038675786,0.000019381807,0.0017479871,0.00012016805,0.000016159887,0.00019431619,0.002788119,0.000100756675,0.00013839437,0.05279285,0.90673196,0.035311244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011713548,0.00004221708,0.0012055459,0.0003227859,0.000019670508,0.0002735634,0.0046212613,0.00043797976,0.00022888707,0.023213085,0.969586,0.00003723797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034651405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004897965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024926446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004019192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06598592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976829395","doi":"10.1087/20100308","title":"Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; History; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.4691507489717965,"score_gpt":0.5446447001275085,"score_spread":0.07549395115571206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976829395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4294214,0.04315587,0.016978411,0.007153283,0.002701788,0.00029155903,0.22424856,0.0019724504,0.27407667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7977417,0.018193612,0.0128139015,0.00096253946,0.0026547841,0.00045249736,0.115024365,0.00026997933,0.051886648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970919,0.00043564092,0.0004906659,0.00031762573,0.001462701,0.00020146417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844728,0.0052433703,0.0031541963,0.00056096364,0.0053070695,0.0012616267],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029920992,0.00040991922,0.00041089498,0.017756855,0.0005161372,0.0028492552,0.00045899843,0.0006711262,0.012952359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122379195,0.00022130918,0.00075494614,0.01110473,0.0004239686,0.0031653184,0.0011242041,0.000687979,0.008946778],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035416184,0.00024911246,0.4540909,0.0022717072,0.0007570082,0.0011093284,0.0022071854,0.0021868076,0.007154883,0.025390873,0.2063418,0.29788625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025295814,0.0001198299,0.6033195,0.0005317724,0.00037721344,0.0018526134,0.0014270495,0.002119855,0.0033256721,0.0039587473,0.3828582,0.00008430619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00388126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043179565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009711217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006971173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043329954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977087914","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.257","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Business model; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.30117199054805116,"score_gpt":0.46586916195735545,"score_spread":0.1646971714093043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977087914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09078006,0.08534088,0.0059271767,0.62743634,0.005831518,0.00010163502,0.0004820808,0.00033065476,0.18376963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87166756,0.05828333,0.012408918,0.017040504,0.016465234,0.0002156338,0.00032387144,0.00017524704,0.023419669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703894,0.015822327,0.0017302565,0.0022717153,0.006923815,0.0028625065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74213725,0.14398319,0.030686086,0.011773807,0.037729274,0.03369044],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048084445,0.0004156233,0.0009977763,0.010363593,0.008727871,0.050523687,0.0026119705,0.006312857,0.013460948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098473035,0.0006376897,0.00074018777,0.017926777,0.0096256705,0.036197558,0.0043641264,0.003929559,0.0030961582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002235122,0.0003259493,0.03261233,0.0009333957,0.00008119314,0.0004422525,0.011208002,0.0009730349,0.00056309084,0.53534746,0.04919191,0.3680978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007079973,0.00026961367,0.039567843,0.0016593949,0.00006519063,0.0011072566,0.034554344,0.0024213553,0.0007921655,0.31771362,0.6015313,0.0002470423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031568846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033398564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009312801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025604771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2542979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978536634","doi":"10.1119/1.4731619","title":"Erratum: “2012 AAPT award citations at the Winter Meeting, Ontario, California” [Am. J. Phys. 80, 465–467 (2012)]","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"American Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physics; Physics education; Engineering physics; Library science; Mathematics education; Quantum mechanics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22208958370558715,"score_gpt":0.4624262457321566,"score_spread":0.24033666202656948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978536634","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044381025,0.0013183302,0.00040384402,0.14036295,0.82414836,0.00007453615,0.005460826,0.00061410485,0.027173173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008750479,0.00550158,0.0024082358,0.11703981,0.11130286,0.00026283227,0.009593741,0.001037433,0.744103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530715,0.0003250586,0.00069461326,0.00034596617,0.0029896023,0.0003376492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97967666,0.0029345483,0.0009584551,0.00062197633,0.0149927605,0.0008156364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027791655,0.0016048508,0.0013068172,0.0044347504,0.006438203,0.0043138587,0.0025750652,0.005720613,0.071641825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038343806,0.00090818206,0.001251713,0.0042579477,0.0013391025,0.0024409264,0.0017577392,0.0065227,0.045570802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009451295,0.0000028092804,0.00003229482,0.000013093261,0.000001227793,0.000029543375,0.0000069088096,0.000007847215,0.0000066961334,0.00015996833,0.9986212,0.0011089336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003065914,0.000016392214,0.0015817005,0.00020092062,0.000017280701,0.00008803233,0.000119070595,0.000120161596,0.00013102227,0.0006718612,0.9969903,0.000032499232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15250908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27079213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15250908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00844201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121230865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3032428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978865080","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.07.001","title":"Is there a need for a new journal devoted to preventive medicine?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive healthcare; Medicine; Alternative medicine; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Public health; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.451447446405072,"score_gpt":0.575194997565831,"score_spread":0.12374755116075903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978865080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002722581,0.026828827,0.00048192215,0.4280643,0.54238904,0.00002952187,0.000025914045,0.0001302571,0.0017779408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00500505,0.04170593,0.0029651606,0.22345659,0.7218055,0.00007977034,0.000079012374,0.00016702357,0.0047359234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.977241,0.0060278336,0.0032227843,0.0023391545,0.0091554625,0.0020138694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7687165,0.07035665,0.01770483,0.009156407,0.059105553,0.07496003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032047156,0.0010747679,0.0033132618,0.004643525,0.005826502,0.03397953,0.0038058572,0.019200794,0.013449787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100208975,0.0009905536,0.0023804882,0.00352989,0.011641462,0.020517023,0.0042551,0.027456243,0.008401788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001447165,0.00016336872,0.0009681339,0.0036420624,0.00010672467,0.00048946973,0.0008971114,0.000039882565,0.00074409787,0.019576082,0.9008512,0.07237719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004491396,0.00006984403,0.0007464178,0.0014671397,0.00007342432,0.000614374,0.0011236101,0.000074615724,0.00009828427,0.0069394545,0.98869973,0.000048176913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000594165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014951548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00442838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026306227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16948354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979570114","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0077","title":"Publishing as a Vocation: The Necessity of Independent Scholarly Media","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Public relations; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.3844269601575179,"score_gpt":0.4915914338750796,"score_spread":0.10716447371756166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979570114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050574783,0.00816128,0.024920246,0.27192876,0.005427959,0.00028095514,0.00010550427,0.00030707548,0.6382934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754252,0.004209366,0.019002536,0.024655625,0.008092298,0.00070788246,0.0001345649,0.00049222447,0.06728024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9147987,0.047371604,0.0039017596,0.0048638084,0.023170855,0.005893234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67214185,0.21987547,0.024629692,0.03708602,0.022531068,0.023735868],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07206968,0.00053454837,0.0015474322,0.003946428,0.017444666,0.07103618,0.0041051055,0.010914583,0.007889087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16087897,0.0009704724,0.00074650795,0.006498778,0.05420912,0.05136358,0.023916954,0.0128145525,0.0031163297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047558147,0.000071264534,0.00093600457,0.0001362484,0.000014510628,0.00017685944,0.01767196,0.00012437163,0.00021292202,0.92213506,0.019248644,0.03922463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045910405,0.00007678368,0.0015694336,0.0005633357,0.000025166759,0.00038660938,0.016987616,0.00064119295,0.0010310452,0.45634228,0.52222645,0.00010411177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011991446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017524093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92896384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008631381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020325126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38114548},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1979763623","doi":"10.1080/13614570903001322","title":"Waking OA's “Slumbering Giant”: The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Review of Information Networking","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Publish or perish; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Internet privacy; Free access; Political science; Position (finance); Business; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Advertising","score_opus":0.5753178833745927,"score_gpt":0.5601029611884042,"score_spread":0.015214922186188473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979763623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032666683,0.049391285,0.021991383,0.805424,0.009269699,0.0001314533,0.00029690532,0.0005469652,0.08028164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59133804,0.04194035,0.033178054,0.27897215,0.014039314,0.00039016394,0.0006234303,0.0006260506,0.038892467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9104636,0.03089018,0.0074155238,0.003782844,0.042747397,0.004700509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7027401,0.14428261,0.026002336,0.034143653,0.062543474,0.030287888],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081603274,0.00032667175,0.0013902592,0.00486026,0.0069457646,0.03016997,0.0025103504,0.0072514545,0.003937851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2048763,0.0004422733,0.0008791852,0.008604347,0.020961354,0.028165568,0.0118107945,0.008504461,0.0015505621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014117516,0.00011094668,0.00878095,0.0009353778,0.000098300065,0.00020590729,0.004874488,0.00026153258,0.0011395663,0.5565646,0.19410229,0.23278491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039259194,0.000103133185,0.012319993,0.001838369,0.000063293875,0.00030798867,0.005382823,0.0006446605,0.001342686,0.17810707,0.7997047,0.00014605881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014152446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020045877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99748963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009636737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046443246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4315645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980290188","doi":"10.1109/acsip.2011.6064461","title":"Impact of research funding on nanobiotechnology scientific production: Does concentration in a few universities make sense?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Nanobiotechnology; Production (economics); Position (finance); Contrast (vision); Political science; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7496887350038993,"score_gpt":0.6074311707504033,"score_spread":0.142257564253496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980290188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736192,0.0020475558,0.0011493954,0.003186859,0.000023543476,0.000049320846,0.00034633977,0.000023940338,0.019553889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981592,0.00044070842,0.00025137857,0.00009023792,0.000041583156,0.00001964551,0.00011261629,0.000005954152,0.00087871216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903865,0.0025880975,0.0005306738,0.0008841632,0.0041371486,0.0014733876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84064895,0.07968688,0.042780884,0.0038998066,0.017124813,0.01585866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009649547,0.00027865512,0.0016485654,0.0050149737,0.0024570813,0.0053103613,0.0014709634,0.0012439407,0.0034462023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08349102,0.00023674878,0.0004410931,0.01113948,0.0032792154,0.0034777382,0.0036173451,0.0008585537,0.00049891265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954145,0.00028268062,0.91961867,0.0002922374,0.00042220732,0.00035847156,0.00363278,0.0035093399,0.001328727,0.00795181,0.0014655903,0.060642026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006643699,0.00027290438,0.97854084,0.00015701499,0.0002614523,0.0001878702,0.004443395,0.0027688723,0.0011197864,0.0059630405,0.0061703045,0.000048201273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10328393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10402969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99498504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011998099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011939883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20536554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980831228","doi":"10.3152/147154302781780822","title":"Do US Congressional earmarks increase research output at universities?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Competition (biology); Instrumental variable; Quality (philosophy); Estimation; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Public administration; Business; Management; Econometrics","score_opus":0.6548266178634141,"score_gpt":0.590624394806003,"score_spread":0.06420222305741108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980831228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7233528,0.015244896,0.0015873616,0.08802305,0.0009417249,0.00009982924,0.0020065142,0.0004911832,0.16825263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126465,0.00446582,0.00059938635,0.004354445,0.0010356063,0.00007514308,0.00049645326,0.00005485226,0.007653645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875244,0.0042605246,0.00087159843,0.0009109363,0.0043945205,0.002037958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81914747,0.08670145,0.06761457,0.0067424034,0.013142359,0.0066518136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016608233,0.0004496681,0.0011453605,0.00515092,0.0019131174,0.010768443,0.0010608404,0.0034408465,0.016315475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13143323,0.00038174907,0.00076382456,0.014601331,0.002837114,0.00621213,0.0030947735,0.0015696619,0.0022387048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073321443,0.0009534424,0.6932101,0.0010038783,0.0007198272,0.00066699856,0.0034745573,0.003250268,0.0018229535,0.048233714,0.030729584,0.21520144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391246,0.0003629215,0.9164271,0.000306654,0.00026561756,0.00013334633,0.0036645576,0.0008639865,0.0023222503,0.020461846,0.054986734,0.00006579194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005933406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00862192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049404483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004192325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08783382},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1981934171","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.1.1","title":"The Canada Foundation for Innovation, Sociology of Knowledge, and the Re-engineering of the University","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21497306306758052,"score_gpt":0.4246659564249422,"score_spread":0.2096928933573617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981934171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025435362,0.046106454,0.0041998005,0.33500573,0.0023680676,0.000093204726,0.0013391926,0.00018910396,0.58526295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301358,0.04103128,0.0045194123,0.013355397,0.00082108704,0.00015984064,0.0006784438,0.00012836527,0.10917044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99110806,0.001584527,0.00027100535,0.0005085312,0.0042765625,0.002251272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721524,0.007280223,0.0024634032,0.0015306198,0.009015241,0.007558144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069190506,0.00041730364,0.0008199848,0.0050581214,0.013700743,0.015570551,0.0011132763,0.0035552701,0.015700584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02190775,0.00030210635,0.00048196985,0.009449219,0.016888466,0.0053174584,0.0051696557,0.0032120843,0.0008790168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028708506,0.00001650568,0.0057748426,0.00020025307,0.000025487208,0.00009162091,0.0023791676,0.00040486464,0.000046637088,0.875452,0.077359825,0.038220182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003327135,0.000019653287,0.028404636,0.0010363269,0.000034474833,0.00008806959,0.0057172216,0.0006972272,0.00014874272,0.19345249,0.77027905,0.00008871861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9216464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95510936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1023568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26532215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.742654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982037740","doi":"10.1118/1.4735301","title":"SU‐E‐T‐237: Leading 25 in 25: A Bibliometric Analysis of Classics Articles in IMRT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Library science; Scientometrics; Web of science; Subject (documents); MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; Meta-analysis; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.5356024017038159,"score_gpt":0.569783587338663,"score_spread":0.03418118563484707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982037740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394905,0.0069644824,0.003246473,0.0010647866,0.00031723818,0.00083770446,0.027572645,0.00045085064,0.020055223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97204876,0.0031268226,0.005145787,0.000109821434,0.00034359546,0.00052405515,0.0148267355,0.000099852514,0.0037745577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957937,0.0007263594,0.0009567283,0.00035913495,0.001882605,0.0002814641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812726,0.00844183,0.0040731397,0.0006862449,0.0046798424,0.00084634987],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044147843,0.000651851,0.00125721,0.064630136,0.0012426694,0.0045860927,0.00077938905,0.00044405728,0.008786307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02925484,0.00019981104,0.002526751,0.09692293,0.00065298675,0.0023281267,0.0016436802,0.00041174958,0.0019903944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010447325,0.00022585651,0.75482106,0.0039948956,0.0019374833,0.0011028335,0.0033086033,0.0012580582,0.0016780574,0.0033631765,0.026896605,0.20036863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011908755,0.0004863642,0.9378239,0.0008759909,0.0019858924,0.0014520707,0.005099411,0.0049374755,0.0022803422,0.0026278815,0.04219879,0.00011269221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051087462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055063465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93536985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002142461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037162616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029393196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983455381","doi":"10.1300/j108v06n02_06","title":"Impact and Publication Patterns: A Model for Examining Resources in an International Context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Data science; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.42326700718571686,"score_gpt":0.5098591079363572,"score_spread":0.08659210075064039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983455381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045992,0.0019086209,0.05388291,0.0045353095,0.00016002006,0.001378684,0.0028231647,0.00043056827,0.030281488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861806,0.00046508535,0.010062835,0.00012367492,0.000066167486,0.0008145825,0.0007150315,0.00006737324,0.001504683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794031,0.011039013,0.0017148589,0.0021440603,0.004419785,0.0012791065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.845721,0.1188195,0.01890178,0.006098079,0.007821252,0.0026382846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026491884,0.0012941437,0.0016481291,0.024868634,0.0018902366,0.009049797,0.0025175584,0.0023322594,0.009235186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12117635,0.00070162624,0.0026111347,0.037208576,0.0049218307,0.013791889,0.005627447,0.0023917663,0.001898246],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064713863,0.00064743066,0.8817465,0.00055000564,0.0015580574,0.00043487913,0.0041885404,0.019097194,0.0004946248,0.026474638,0.0017388497,0.062422182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004313374,0.0014942567,0.6330743,0.00064339326,0.0013498184,0.0011932823,0.011992208,0.22307196,0.0009123169,0.11351704,0.01202624,0.00029378306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008224787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044746865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9751314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037591709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002560699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14010412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983996769","doi":"10.2527/af.2014-0007","title":"Predators and impersonators: A new breed of journals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Frontiers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Breed; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.4025902043520405,"score_gpt":0.5168197438611736,"score_spread":0.11422953950913306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983996769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04041761,0.069566675,0.019432694,0.4319536,0.03146273,0.00014061718,0.00028439387,0.0021101965,0.40463147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44735873,0.044576738,0.015989773,0.17745529,0.03530636,0.0002230658,0.00039835964,0.0028541097,0.27583757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833401,0.0063169766,0.00058249873,0.0023467697,0.0061466983,0.0012669318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625695,0.012220896,0.0046769343,0.005938327,0.006429098,0.008165333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012218872,0.0009701756,0.0014017439,0.0047968263,0.013163957,0.03360238,0.0034856878,0.008169432,0.026339686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034129925,0.0010305975,0.0010196773,0.0036906046,0.024304258,0.042376596,0.011840984,0.010174267,0.010577428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020251602,0.000098940625,0.0056599607,0.00070226786,0.00008380925,0.0017261024,0.058345515,0.00015267312,0.0017251201,0.39408076,0.36469936,0.17252304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013011358,0.000046220248,0.00077895203,0.00028541088,0.000016904818,0.00095508,0.00681712,0.0001457878,0.00018295113,0.04060295,0.95010173,0.00005401309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002379476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030872505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055607017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004942582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08811504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984242254","doi":"10.1108/00012530510599190","title":"Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Citation impact; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; History; Mathematics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.836922757864223,"score_gpt":0.6699587625625484,"score_spread":0.1669639953016746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984242254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35174277,0.033675857,0.28760934,0.0115547,0.0126868775,0.014523509,0.14659017,0.011573451,0.13004327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7635486,0.0031162105,0.18002582,0.0017918167,0.0035982616,0.009981607,0.028141607,0.0024740929,0.0073219086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84374946,0.043653555,0.04492006,0.016208148,0.04762154,0.0038472742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4656134,0.2966965,0.09168483,0.060165368,0.07915736,0.006682505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11054507,0.002892432,0.0052698757,0.059159588,0.0029562158,0.019766625,0.0038279241,0.0022501992,0.015178724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4272515,0.0007101809,0.0063085477,0.067765705,0.0037120413,0.017941104,0.0067274133,0.0026218425,0.0061116894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026595257,0.00052375055,0.4535428,0.02080091,0.0075170915,0.0005510604,0.0049977917,0.0025553184,0.0027918383,0.015874503,0.054101616,0.43408382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007020057,0.0033434555,0.627841,0.010718442,0.005533893,0.0019586151,0.011420221,0.029563852,0.0083478335,0.068042405,0.23161198,0.0009162641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004140856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033153822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035696798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005752283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5846252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985467003","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015","title":"Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Arthritis Society","keywords":"Citation; Peer review; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.6434841767182838,"score_gpt":0.6626164012696232,"score_spread":0.01913222455133934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985467003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979069,0.00059322634,0.00018768298,0.00022062744,0.000027098133,0.0000938112,0.00021945879,0.0000063553152,0.0007448147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984627,0.00023991465,0.00023081277,0.00015602628,0.0000551048,0.000092029695,0.0001584448,0.000010310017,0.00059472164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783091,0.010279298,0.003122399,0.0027933328,0.004032001,0.0014639116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8123031,0.07809516,0.06653802,0.015172875,0.019406937,0.00848401],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017829757,0.0005105121,0.0010013222,0.0031986132,0.0029068126,0.0038331135,0.0016251798,0.002371101,0.0030371912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11242757,0.001091423,0.0006243896,0.0040227664,0.001705677,0.0031890753,0.0017711679,0.002071276,0.0011363112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014082655,0.0006322505,0.9915543,0.00006327979,0.00011687598,0.00016676313,0.0040774643,0.000015002901,0.00011703056,0.00010819914,0.00034417523,0.0026637875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002851258,0.0005002868,0.9923268,0.000059262606,0.00013245217,0.0006632741,0.0048636086,0.00013726964,0.00016931118,0.00018696074,0.00090233487,0.000029960767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055919075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005507973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000946506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002562361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09429389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986382245","doi":"10.7332/4300","title":"May the odds be ever in your favor: a brief comment on the review games in ecology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Immediate Science Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.5175128813566564,"score_gpt":0.5609093202705826,"score_spread":0.043396438913926194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986382245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001865127,0.0014180345,0.0001715884,0.984522,0.012491219,0.0000055767437,0.000032966687,0.000011956346,0.0011600984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063994974,0.0011564796,0.00031100292,0.95630956,0.033186354,0.00003402887,0.000016615406,0.000039606988,0.0025468261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750201,0.007601201,0.0027483976,0.003881377,0.008684314,0.00206451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7438133,0.20717473,0.011357951,0.0037283115,0.025672618,0.008253095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039824974,0.0012216892,0.0020298257,0.0025017217,0.006802517,0.011795677,0.0062875086,0.07132085,0.007306011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23976195,0.0011647425,0.002585606,0.0032343976,0.013826844,0.016571257,0.005989209,0.05717127,0.0041407878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007344963,0.000012186462,0.00043229712,0.00012032495,0.00004635322,0.00041591414,0.00084394927,0.000072984585,0.00011705091,0.030421767,0.963101,0.004342717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016133931,0.0000530595,0.0018477606,0.0008477303,0.00010159893,0.0006352841,0.0022970296,0.00042754173,0.00038584953,0.05224221,0.94077724,0.00022334197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022494271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028119596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007234281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00827778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21061713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986593070","doi":"10.1029/2009eo240006","title":"Fein Receives Edward A. Flinn III Award","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Social Fund; European Science Foundation","keywords":"Political science; Management; Library science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5251693089797328,"score_gpt":0.5843264562240658,"score_spread":0.059157147244332964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986593070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025681658,0.010588649,0.0016166772,0.28562403,0.106766745,0.00023434861,0.0024551295,0.00042231657,0.5897239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00901317,0.004767779,0.00094771356,0.011948663,0.004813851,0.000050214046,0.00089406205,0.000098824865,0.96746576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996566,0.0002729043,0.000105602,0.00025059062,0.002159216,0.0006457109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877274,0.00035764786,0.00023823859,0.00029215027,0.004446829,0.006937795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004533049,0.0008135104,0.00089712697,0.0018028214,0.0031775665,0.0056008273,0.00093184283,0.0041554132,0.15932448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008531128,0.00027926898,0.00051446375,0.00096753205,0.0008238845,0.0016382718,0.003353962,0.0026765536,0.08732114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027515314,0.000034890192,0.00024933886,0.000015733232,0.0000029319733,0.00005633572,0.00001426885,0.000032357333,0.0000696824,0.0036832206,0.964068,0.031745728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069050475,0.000019420966,0.0005275894,0.000029692164,0.000002151002,0.000053277603,0.000028863893,0.00004874102,0.000063879495,0.0005331771,0.998681,0.0000052479904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015649538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05009287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15932448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044783903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012633207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5329935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986726592","doi":"10.3152/147154300781782147","title":"Impact of collaborative research on academic science","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Research policy; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.7446807243754998,"score_gpt":0.7166696462433838,"score_spread":0.028011078132116007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986726592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3307228,0.011333664,0.0071860617,0.0522482,0.0006758925,0.00031842903,0.0004419668,0.0001712578,0.5969017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98990166,0.0020893007,0.001727309,0.0013190325,0.00033061602,0.000093669085,0.00008518149,0.000025134043,0.004428055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.83449304,0.08873134,0.0052435095,0.0083759045,0.05029846,0.012857692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6212741,0.23495963,0.0323017,0.026809286,0.05216489,0.032490492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06612347,0.0005378197,0.0010642867,0.007693893,0.012572216,0.018942274,0.0022905327,0.003843599,0.015617164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22070499,0.00036268495,0.0015100532,0.010071943,0.010853802,0.008126208,0.018886674,0.0030387163,0.0015473651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087386894,0.0009150254,0.16612498,0.0012618502,0.00085724547,0.0013811887,0.03161308,0.0041239397,0.0011927321,0.53293854,0.016401753,0.24231574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067151745,0.00093788817,0.22215396,0.0022553753,0.0011201412,0.0012533471,0.07134099,0.005620957,0.0029568404,0.36337677,0.3280514,0.00026081337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053846065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0456358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020529442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04150397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34969854},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1987191136","doi":"10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y","title":"The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation analysis; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6466000573736542,"score_gpt":0.5889075728966469,"score_spread":0.057692484477007366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987191136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056410284,0.98856443,0.0024918872,0.0037583588,0.0009706263,0.000021516898,0.000050786522,0.000037306865,0.003540833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010101364,0.9800337,0.0059160623,0.0013971459,0.0015459487,0.000057279336,0.000104884166,0.000030784347,0.00081297895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.945679,0.015696581,0.005409838,0.0029971309,0.029764056,0.0004533368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78858185,0.14313741,0.02423081,0.005473641,0.037193116,0.0013832294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032833807,0.001232901,0.0028685452,0.04798206,0.0012666711,0.0067472938,0.0024666698,0.002626765,0.0012846274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13809231,0.0008664205,0.0013577944,0.049683776,0.0037273972,0.011241603,0.0020070309,0.0025165216,0.0016353801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036268124,0.00003655868,0.0034008261,0.026924431,0.00042823987,0.00014868555,0.0009106556,0.00043549153,0.00075382047,0.02711705,0.02097413,0.9188338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001941697,0.00017883239,0.016349506,0.03501751,0.0005980514,0.0025901236,0.001626505,0.00059243274,0.0017841989,0.029338276,0.9116827,0.00022238569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038299519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008942387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004239276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005743495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17364383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987570886","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0162-3","title":"The discipline dependence of citation statistics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; National Science Council","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Value (mathematics); Index (typography); Citation index; Scientometrics; Computer science; Data science; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5142649586072647,"score_gpt":0.6001517069820625,"score_spread":0.08588674837479782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987570886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60153407,0.023490947,0.26658088,0.014255741,0.0005893582,0.00012140825,0.0031005493,0.0017463984,0.088580646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970708,0.0067794775,0.008989283,0.000884798,0.0012175863,0.00006476603,0.0012853077,0.00037706835,0.0096938135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185246,0.0039146934,0.00039808106,0.0012844395,0.0021129497,0.00043736037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6922049,0.255186,0.01601282,0.015688946,0.017917993,0.002989452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152023425,0.0005329359,0.001790772,0.011901399,0.0011808994,0.0035679012,0.0018037313,0.0024355461,0.006761391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1882225,0.00097003614,0.0014908804,0.0125535885,0.0033238146,0.006003823,0.0020274336,0.0033451747,0.0017808642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049697445,0.00026401138,0.12698796,0.0006196144,0.0005983858,0.00069587363,0.0015720716,0.048104092,0.0042719403,0.66026217,0.019843582,0.13628335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007473778,0.00018453306,0.16555005,0.00031545418,0.0004162095,0.0012050079,0.0005063659,0.20030604,0.0029106406,0.6141388,0.014174393,0.00021776605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058090826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019007492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019704415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08039862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987707043","doi":"10.1136/bmj.h210","title":"Firm action needed on predatory journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Business; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.7969926508729327,"score_gpt":0.6778639477958661,"score_spread":0.11912870307706658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987707043","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006193183,0.0048868544,0.00009954172,0.104809,0.88921887,0.000026647547,0.000073215626,0.00006019739,0.0007637072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008836181,0.0059100594,0.0002847577,0.0959714,0.89096004,0.00004880232,0.000043602005,0.0000447408,0.0058528786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780131,0.0042308057,0.0035325913,0.0017536579,0.011195204,0.0012746773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8823726,0.06261488,0.007565904,0.0035205341,0.034842763,0.009083258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023685478,0.0041411375,0.005748848,0.005670672,0.0059961164,0.014154489,0.005418526,0.045514237,0.015379727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12209969,0.0021378074,0.004367256,0.0036141549,0.0052322033,0.00905526,0.0026619975,0.04134016,0.009200929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004616936,0.000014252113,0.000043224274,0.00071596977,0.000081480284,0.0000764222,0.000032667842,0.000019971183,0.0000536354,0.0004718873,0.99322367,0.005220664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031307552,0.000048772592,0.000737464,0.0023304315,0.0003956528,0.00014866242,0.00020865908,0.00016676338,0.00022211051,0.0047841184,0.99058414,0.000060107974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041058464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011931897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97631454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005461556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012037703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12526226},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1987881751","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404","title":"Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Computer science; Mainstream; Data science; Citation; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.0943119420156931,"score_gpt":0.41708529981832754,"score_spread":0.32277335780263444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987881751","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006682697,0.033484414,0.013612622,0.37797764,0.550176,0.00022377272,0.0019215281,0.0018044262,0.020131381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014786529,0.060715415,0.019921416,0.097186476,0.7152618,0.00043815756,0.002848508,0.0023792824,0.08646241],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992155,0.0018584419,0.0010133672,0.0007710369,0.003964744,0.00023733782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281676,0.015893746,0.0037202118,0.0022131088,0.0472331,0.0027722265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011117912,0.0013552009,0.0015368316,0.0070722084,0.0016365304,0.012997965,0.002247859,0.0033974936,0.027962059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06947365,0.00054388266,0.00092438597,0.007780754,0.002203912,0.0075826794,0.0018583835,0.00781177,0.01961977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010995451,0.000008665083,0.00017005461,0.00022231313,0.000006536894,0.000013955964,0.000039177736,0.000056299745,0.00008806144,0.0025013734,0.96084356,0.03603894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074904733,0.000023319775,0.00061513856,0.00050852436,0.000009565543,0.000047794383,0.00008901102,0.0002869778,0.00017417126,0.004162464,0.99405295,0.000022556433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027017659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001904148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025793186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038066003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0935424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988983771","doi":"10.4000/rga.457","title":"Services de transfert des savoirs","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de géographie alpine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.34711264679008363,"score_gpt":0.4623903576677502,"score_spread":0.11527771087766658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988983771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25656068,0.005069793,0.24632955,0.009676691,0.00073055614,0.0016416232,0.003347535,0.0026708187,0.47397283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66146934,0.004234465,0.10081863,0.0007112814,0.00013711398,0.00069263985,0.0018440792,0.0006009851,0.2294915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973471,0.00070692174,0.00012169835,0.00038215937,0.0010695354,0.00037249888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972574,0.00075262535,0.00023766325,0.00031919166,0.0010306542,0.0004024698],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021386703,0.00090968027,0.00048707763,0.002210203,0.0027937042,0.0069884574,0.0018222982,0.0024810785,0.023180123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057284376,0.0005566279,0.0012736546,0.0025165922,0.002115626,0.0044700517,0.0036801433,0.0013190893,0.0050313324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006692789,0.0004906403,0.03952354,0.0016664745,0.00013707686,0.00378618,0.034455918,0.020852461,0.011586738,0.5438017,0.027100349,0.3159295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757866,0.00040981325,0.018919526,0.0013106766,0.0001318037,0.0019412367,0.022061117,0.027965007,0.007190118,0.08174245,0.8380695,0.00017125349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10034086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06051666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005441517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012494564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19951361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989152391","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0030","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989152391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112097915,0.030379472,0.007156029,0.73938435,0.088928595,0.00013053889,0.00038096734,0.0016548119,0.120775595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25684932,0.033376474,0.009886034,0.3292882,0.10581348,0.00019612952,0.0007125774,0.003487487,0.2603903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.963903,0.007926988,0.0036296519,0.0041505485,0.0181238,0.0022660191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70498204,0.14447093,0.027427819,0.02066367,0.08051895,0.021936614],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026918449,0.00061762315,0.0010383406,0.0023377945,0.004528666,0.018082751,0.0022564298,0.009305101,0.07181971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34795463,0.00083624094,0.00054408284,0.0025243412,0.0076742833,0.013951355,0.0028251265,0.005985605,0.05992271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008002806,0.00004656755,0.0029222579,0.00033156035,0.000034673158,0.0002463388,0.0013044516,0.00007948028,0.00055516645,0.026370734,0.8596083,0.10842045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009272237,0.00006777493,0.003939994,0.000451321,0.0000461195,0.0011573227,0.0021734533,0.00028074117,0.0013191602,0.040707156,0.94967777,0.00008659274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020756708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002775795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98191726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038108826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006238388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24026084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989379933","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0011","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989379933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5471813,0.1357318,0.013618288,0.15372455,0.0032844667,0.00151409,0.00076791254,0.00049705803,0.1436805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568278,0.022419509,0.0073817084,0.001806035,0.0012059723,0.00017972523,0.00023227763,0.000030585194,0.009916241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680219,0.010085205,0.0036691749,0.0028181789,0.013344911,0.0020606532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150332,0.020496204,0.018113699,0.0057242606,0.031695373,0.008937234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031907506,0.00046680516,0.00081234495,0.0058099777,0.006206678,0.010201776,0.0025604141,0.0021516124,0.0036221982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05576142,0.00030763366,0.000426023,0.014109341,0.0044308216,0.0054790513,0.003159357,0.0012447775,0.00064111815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027940588,0.00038700565,0.17237438,0.005146089,0.00024193044,0.002175537,0.026240544,0.0030457545,0.00523711,0.20856062,0.03966026,0.5366513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019583329,0.0007545637,0.5604895,0.0026737757,0.00018720023,0.0019459266,0.022258075,0.008519345,0.0052562044,0.06309197,0.3342417,0.00038588184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02559033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025936034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016834462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05118493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1687451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990144582","doi":"10.1016/s0927-5371(01)00041-0","title":"Co-authorship and the output of academic economists","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Panel data; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.49905064395572674,"score_gpt":0.5310680544386404,"score_spread":0.03201741048291362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990144582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97348166,0.0037244614,0.0020506529,0.0031401613,0.00015726042,0.000011229194,0.0007114855,0.000062558705,0.016660573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964372,0.0005927708,0.00020518694,0.000033987977,0.0002308988,0.0000054503294,0.00020986216,0.0000105542185,0.002274083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964539,0.0015604738,0.00038262998,0.0002834042,0.0009630153,0.0003566638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.760464,0.16965166,0.036895897,0.0067037684,0.015413713,0.010871011],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009336919,0.00044390917,0.00077800517,0.006819445,0.0009994021,0.0060167075,0.00074174436,0.0015228281,0.007265973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097002394,0.00019017037,0.00049816846,0.010544323,0.0015873542,0.00382567,0.0020389229,0.0012542456,0.0018861882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063772814,0.00033455522,0.9453932,0.00021834858,0.0003815195,0.000444841,0.0017750742,0.0054737073,0.00053462334,0.008369562,0.002465234,0.03397173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020773336,0.0004088896,0.8660385,0.00028247424,0.00041070627,0.0010512191,0.0058669993,0.031707957,0.0031180992,0.081465505,0.009351609,0.00009040576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014160494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016838586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013571552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04937893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990436954","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1386-4","title":"Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.4898121462066615,"score_gpt":0.5481804217127789,"score_spread":0.058368275506117395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990436954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86585766,0.082822606,0.0010080796,0.0052872226,0.00041205218,0.00002690374,0.0018396452,0.000029690227,0.042716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723808,0.024044503,0.00036469803,0.00022040658,0.00028098954,0.000011627749,0.00052653404,0.000012278715,0.0021580502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897313,0.00022531317,0.0001552081,0.00023149065,0.00025979654,0.00015509505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959965,0.0017723029,0.0009055384,0.00030017798,0.00081455946,0.00021100268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026861131,0.0001747735,0.0003735012,0.009556131,0.0014261561,0.002089683,0.00029498158,0.0005553132,0.0024255014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006133698,0.0001698282,0.0003687218,0.0142478915,0.0016075983,0.0034614329,0.0014793257,0.00076442276,0.00029578616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003996533,0.00014655387,0.34335208,0.0023783597,0.0003857654,0.0013479954,0.06330414,0.0012111699,0.0022457691,0.18583305,0.0086550405,0.3907405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055517344,0.00015489369,0.7845485,0.0009872203,0.00017580668,0.00088415446,0.018047323,0.00039794671,0.0010618821,0.011557305,0.18213297,0.000046404995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008396628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009080728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99731386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002321312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025081746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016842425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990771254","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2012.705139","title":"Four Decades of Materials are Used by Researchers in Mathematics: Evaluating Citations' Age and Publication Types in Mathematical Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Original research; Library science; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.7851492443736335,"score_gpt":0.6170827924943438,"score_spread":0.1680664518792897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990771254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98240846,0.0063315188,0.0010670177,0.0015443481,0.00016990786,0.00008118216,0.0005726286,0.00003099308,0.007793972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921296,0.0027618955,0.0019292921,0.0003014161,0.00036595785,0.00011392885,0.0007486226,0.000038189453,0.0016111416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824102,0.005004677,0.0042858906,0.0008203092,0.0066887997,0.00079027476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63690954,0.17993706,0.120647095,0.01423018,0.039812405,0.008463759],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031176306,0.00026903555,0.0007244249,0.022027534,0.0019544333,0.006631513,0.0009555216,0.0011625123,0.0039773574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21318614,0.00034284062,0.001164321,0.019827789,0.0016817532,0.009784874,0.0046245176,0.0010794402,0.0015206127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036891305,0.0001232142,0.937823,0.00039901718,0.00022669669,0.00021960172,0.0050635575,0.00021875245,0.00057912496,0.001609595,0.00087204954,0.052496552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034220284,0.00041325577,0.97844523,0.0004883394,0.0002492295,0.00048143414,0.006969606,0.00037954102,0.0010510226,0.0026922359,0.008742845,0.00005310964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019568577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050330986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97797245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017666473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028172883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16487807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W199182376","doi":"10.1515/9783110308464-022","title":"Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Citation; Computer science; Data science; Misnomer; Context (archaeology); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.710803390071182,"score_gpt":0.5868286611509752,"score_spread":0.12397472892020678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W199182376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15820926,0.02297151,0.32913455,0.09703219,0.006169822,0.0005494107,0.0032393523,0.0016737211,0.38102022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88479334,0.0065447637,0.08395613,0.0038886133,0.00405872,0.00087439036,0.0013604447,0.0013001786,0.013223434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518478,0.03553619,0.002292142,0.0028938663,0.0063435812,0.00108637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84452283,0.11801911,0.013041019,0.010948214,0.010990561,0.0024782224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03419721,0.0022546162,0.0013995116,0.037917852,0.011401074,0.033706363,0.0038520724,0.0065831603,0.005465528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103821605,0.0008721348,0.0012743887,0.03251547,0.047948297,0.057770174,0.012704758,0.0063982797,0.0012520249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023844483,0.000022175747,0.0037016796,0.0002841277,0.000034851895,0.00034151462,0.14582391,0.0004906417,0.00027847264,0.8244133,0.006102072,0.018483352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014480045,0.000036765432,0.0037751326,0.0008457198,0.00004646921,0.00045099185,0.09264247,0.0031130295,0.00068929174,0.6385029,0.25978327,0.00009938924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085964305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007068499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008327902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005196263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18085432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992101860","doi":"10.5860/crl.75.6.808","title":"Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Sciences?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Discoverability; Publishing; Electronic publishing; Publication; Library science; Open access publishing; Work (physics); Political science; Open science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; The Internet; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.9083715545556956,"score_gpt":0.6707751710001016,"score_spread":0.23759638355559398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992101860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69793963,0.007044917,0.0057805264,0.14702581,0.0016746091,0.00034678113,0.00072320655,0.00043644191,0.13902822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96683574,0.0047107646,0.0040621515,0.013385912,0.0015283321,0.00025969875,0.00031079442,0.00022514141,0.008681556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9059921,0.044855908,0.008577494,0.0035792752,0.031617433,0.005377811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39608335,0.3702947,0.13162683,0.034642156,0.032528184,0.03482489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076172315,0.0003058929,0.0009311732,0.005066393,0.0040956307,0.017432306,0.003303386,0.003101744,0.020215703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47585386,0.00087371474,0.0007138328,0.007790677,0.008679099,0.024061915,0.010013822,0.0026649337,0.0049876715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011360203,0.0017236148,0.28709576,0.0019979882,0.00022158504,0.0005497858,0.030381164,0.00034309813,0.0021462652,0.06671002,0.045044597,0.56265014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044390862,0.0015870976,0.44706467,0.0032467602,0.00018841823,0.0016241072,0.08880164,0.0015289746,0.004347267,0.102603175,0.3483136,0.00025041233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024301938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037183596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037525923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012304077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40284252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992820609","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.002","title":"Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a “typical professor”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Publication; Accreditation; Scope (computer science); Citation analysis; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6921114392845578,"score_gpt":0.5922830016658597,"score_spread":0.09982843761869808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992820609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959459,0.00022214807,0.00042152882,0.00044864317,0.00000791353,0.000010076677,0.0002942529,0.000024081943,0.002625418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974704,0.00020223742,0.0006877551,0.000079659534,0.00006208904,0.000010398548,0.00027889502,0.000012693292,0.0011959481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981673,0.0005801013,0.00027022624,0.00026979725,0.00045525964,0.00025736768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813725,0.005541376,0.0057413904,0.0007074059,0.0036715106,0.0029659334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019867113,0.00012140255,0.0003685041,0.009733613,0.0011674078,0.0024452484,0.00058617874,0.0007072476,0.0038827239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017087929,0.00014129099,0.00025889746,0.010378054,0.0004827418,0.0021127479,0.0012074761,0.00034059785,0.0017230569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022240765,0.000111655514,0.9613713,0.00006402378,0.000051376155,0.00014525591,0.0031292157,0.00012101565,0.002603663,0.0004805526,0.0008428373,0.030856594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018993123,0.00029246113,0.9779067,0.0000262926,0.000084071675,0.0010986984,0.010191891,0.0018378622,0.0022836176,0.0008395966,0.0053914506,0.0000283866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017923316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00501177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068152667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008697278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012989044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993438223","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080","title":"Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; Genome Canada","keywords":"Data sharing; Compromise; Inclusion (mineral); Special section; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9355392449111711,"score_gpt":0.6068143652781375,"score_spread":0.32872487963303365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993438223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024948318,0.0016548885,0.011766193,0.67496216,0.28142348,0.0002196988,0.0015565605,0.0015691668,0.024353014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09490063,0.0039426754,0.037443306,0.4207872,0.19061103,0.0015854865,0.0037249427,0.006186126,0.24081858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8696174,0.045624387,0.023840986,0.011557956,0.04411478,0.005244418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2967683,0.20704903,0.037379235,0.107676305,0.33383313,0.01729406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07296608,0.0010358627,0.003523343,0.0043174154,0.0062172106,0.014153738,0.0038162556,0.014151962,0.066639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54666,0.0016002975,0.0012537948,0.0056777527,0.006150692,0.014748681,0.011232565,0.018606141,0.09855721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021119541,0.000027625216,0.0008700668,0.00024183579,0.00004011763,0.00021484554,0.0008050322,0.000068033216,0.0005914282,0.008565846,0.964467,0.02389695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007909479,0.00004106492,0.0018272541,0.00082884426,0.000039454746,0.000398593,0.0015920746,0.0010981909,0.0012681305,0.019858599,0.9728651,0.000103521335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023543448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002756466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9270339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039995657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011862205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38588613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993562201","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.003","title":"Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Accreditation; Econometrics; Publication bias; Statistics; Differential (mechanical device); Computer science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.6028694960870139,"score_gpt":0.5223753468198439,"score_spread":0.08049414926717002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993562201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82343864,0.0026959335,0.15181252,0.002049294,0.00048493745,0.0003699197,0.0020146694,0.000772404,0.016361805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96932393,0.00037716323,0.027537659,0.00016164636,0.00020347536,0.00015941351,0.0012333891,0.00013969181,0.0008636177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8835139,0.056547225,0.012367026,0.008940422,0.03472953,0.003901874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5112373,0.3149936,0.07425589,0.049726464,0.04757944,0.0022073635],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083061896,0.001047659,0.0018792527,0.010497112,0.0013133517,0.006231014,0.0012245085,0.001022225,0.0017980738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42331833,0.00040764772,0.0016320593,0.020230401,0.0029405206,0.006302005,0.003755005,0.0012221378,0.0007558945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001723094,0.00015180308,0.6531113,0.0013883543,0.0024078414,0.00031333865,0.003306932,0.01696395,0.0051259375,0.02414061,0.0034766684,0.28789017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002310656,0.0016221495,0.78309256,0.0006344041,0.0023104248,0.00085431803,0.0029936794,0.056046333,0.02307864,0.10741124,0.021199297,0.0005258246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002124764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020864706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024096647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029137114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43927854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993945630","doi":"10.1002/meet.2008.1450450292","title":"Author bibliographic coupling: Another approach to citation‐based author knowledge network analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Citation; Field (mathematics); Complement (music); Computer science; Co-citation; Citation analysis; Data science; Network analysis; Information retrieval; Library science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.2625448598870476,"score_gpt":0.4635367526431875,"score_spread":0.20099189275613988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993945630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34390706,0.003995703,0.58948606,0.0013828778,0.00019608854,0.0006523985,0.003535444,0.00080453895,0.056039874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91677284,0.00067175424,0.07879591,0.00008273241,0.00017440313,0.00036271045,0.0010633253,0.000090641166,0.0019856622],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905861,0.0045184745,0.0007308185,0.00095315377,0.002909469,0.00030203804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95583755,0.029152779,0.0054820776,0.0029123162,0.0058425604,0.0007727364],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007124123,0.0007881428,0.0010988854,0.050840206,0.001882557,0.0043128245,0.0017819589,0.0013741723,0.0037051963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06321955,0.0003805649,0.0010149658,0.056288224,0.001552753,0.004157148,0.0031659007,0.0011990932,0.00047168107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003692133,0.00030534132,0.23651186,0.0012527163,0.0017517522,0.00043077607,0.007851078,0.06825111,0.004816605,0.27815118,0.00620015,0.39410824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010304207,0.00018299086,0.13365957,0.00044303198,0.0008745867,0.0008947597,0.0038210582,0.4837852,0.005138313,0.3352661,0.035629023,0.00020224242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107229855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086071165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029437055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017505542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037676454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994503791","doi":"10.5596/c09-014","title":"Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Scholarly communication; Library science; Descriptive statistics; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.2608889313194788,"score_gpt":0.5256096575731364,"score_spread":0.26472072625365756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994503791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38137978,0.07016585,0.045567386,0.17510672,0.0047074035,0.0026077903,0.010614467,0.0011204494,0.30873016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312493,0.018860256,0.030595392,0.003813385,0.0013716827,0.0006395024,0.0017633057,0.00018285718,0.011524314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8727968,0.061519455,0.010268631,0.0037024126,0.045743976,0.005968662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4205448,0.36432484,0.082020834,0.0268285,0.08995166,0.016329383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.086056545,0.0005016551,0.0008814164,0.018803319,0.007392978,0.015334739,0.0026647002,0.0019319005,0.012544235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3659989,0.0004542637,0.0007645925,0.057756275,0.009218869,0.006599118,0.006465575,0.001888992,0.00084194564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004633876,0.00021895101,0.24456766,0.0060129417,0.000539872,0.00062184467,0.040261965,0.0018488984,0.00103683,0.19433059,0.053028923,0.45706818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013634145,0.0004469232,0.469617,0.00934569,0.0005319202,0.000882709,0.043317325,0.0035781385,0.0033730727,0.084349014,0.38408643,0.00033540203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37905434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4098588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035889305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13859548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75369596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995474731","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1211892109","title":"No evidence that equations cause impeded communication among biologists","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Computational biology; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7756343136281035,"score_gpt":0.5762885286466921,"score_spread":0.19934578498141142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995474731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058372575,0.0010007744,0.0011177305,0.96116567,0.007921506,0.000021088244,0.00016692464,0.000056135974,0.022712925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13194416,0.0020242347,0.0015077334,0.83659315,0.009348392,0.00007382809,0.00023665126,0.000058382662,0.018213572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785233,0.004387045,0.00086340285,0.0017689269,0.0039171902,0.0012110021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8876412,0.08589769,0.0058270018,0.0055751535,0.010710743,0.0043482077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01783962,0.0003183174,0.0005865943,0.0011849445,0.0031212352,0.0032873533,0.0018383783,0.027721915,0.0155729195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12223607,0.00050850393,0.00078162225,0.0009618886,0.004813812,0.003906439,0.0023729457,0.018873788,0.006092256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005033519,0.00021084651,0.01390171,0.00031702168,0.00020605832,0.004469064,0.002234433,0.00034529032,0.0014683546,0.10267518,0.7935096,0.080159195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038020324,0.00022233937,0.007584723,0.0004449806,0.00014335595,0.0027152265,0.002742921,0.0009205452,0.00329664,0.0812303,0.9001635,0.00015532083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005222236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007658851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99881506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038755492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032630898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094346106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996751905","doi":"10.1136/bmj.326.7383.283","title":"Quality of impact factors of general medical journals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8130175992207538,"score_gpt":0.6988940944208675,"score_spread":0.11412350479988631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996751905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040427223,0.006921449,0.00013452911,0.9634584,0.01871465,0.000018402201,0.0005461471,0.00003759552,0.006126032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1560372,0.010543741,0.0007662361,0.5729201,0.25142807,0.000083181796,0.0006394851,0.0001116177,0.0074704327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225396,0.0025464795,0.0015014719,0.0005966516,0.0028124556,0.00028893765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89513654,0.06690753,0.008667036,0.0033450462,0.022700675,0.0032431565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009865839,0.00043125168,0.0012689963,0.0023522524,0.00089028955,0.0022991968,0.0015463473,0.00869202,0.006172896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12979366,0.00028830944,0.00053149345,0.003227003,0.0018157831,0.0019280463,0.00067635474,0.0070150695,0.003141399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022734758,0.000036927555,0.011075146,0.0002499376,0.000050064336,0.00076795043,0.00012819219,0.00006265889,0.00009478252,0.0018318084,0.94840586,0.03706934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009408502,0.00039749968,0.1466871,0.002910473,0.00032840858,0.014302198,0.0012447658,0.0025839012,0.0012530591,0.032876346,0.7962207,0.00025475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038125303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039520236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99764776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030577644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017635882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052176178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965557","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450440262","title":"All‐author vs. first‐author co‐citation analysis of the Information Science field using Scopus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Co-citation; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; Mathematics; Library science","score_opus":0.20870721170239293,"score_gpt":0.5037997684738248,"score_spread":0.29509255677143187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94730294,0.0013112328,0.034116905,0.00041522703,0.00012609443,0.00010776421,0.0022682534,0.00073750404,0.013614037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497415,0.00025324963,0.012967059,0.000020108986,0.0000422011,0.000055842047,0.00082163914,0.00006861723,0.00079714216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406993,0.0023788381,0.0006425855,0.00045831944,0.0021340123,0.00031635427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094255,0.06419828,0.006739282,0.004267898,0.014181086,0.0011879737],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006770534,0.0005084448,0.0009957056,0.029025005,0.0011334395,0.0049660397,0.00073638186,0.00061744486,0.00243447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056964062,0.00015286102,0.0009842362,0.030407839,0.0007793827,0.002878893,0.0017335569,0.00081651553,0.0005001489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018555725,0.00068094366,0.5698031,0.0017435206,0.0026444832,0.00042352825,0.0028485872,0.04491229,0.009990012,0.041080765,0.009812478,0.31420466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015568078,0.00069857575,0.4322123,0.00035246994,0.0010201351,0.00045232454,0.0053559644,0.46284387,0.040342994,0.048117656,0.008149061,0.0002990284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007712123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00901371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013294632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012307785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035806417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998549090","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.020","title":"Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery: A bibliometric analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Orthopedic surgery; Elbow; Citation; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Relevance (law); Medical literature; Library science; General surgery; Surgery; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.5958593857592792,"score_gpt":0.5445401648114354,"score_spread":0.0513192209478438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998549090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8888353,0.071295515,0.0030866293,0.0008623192,0.00026322887,0.00093386386,0.019541938,0.00026091948,0.014920335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524824,0.030214665,0.00568975,0.00007678764,0.00030141172,0.00061491213,0.0088889925,0.00004104435,0.0016900526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98980194,0.001500885,0.0029036608,0.00064071204,0.0047748247,0.00037797468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623116,0.021697009,0.007240942,0.00095103035,0.0068864394,0.0009129925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075558536,0.0006353293,0.0021713648,0.11894372,0.0015304558,0.004337583,0.0009631839,0.0008405441,0.005581312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051006086,0.00031376717,0.0026618643,0.118050024,0.0007549357,0.0024535554,0.0018472687,0.0003512274,0.0013386435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006876704,0.00032133757,0.75517446,0.017250163,0.00342464,0.0015976654,0.002381584,0.0020572261,0.0018246432,0.0018404691,0.0077382927,0.20570184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013582286,0.00037870856,0.95191497,0.0028664593,0.004904893,0.0031560387,0.0035721937,0.0042769774,0.001742493,0.0027061624,0.024232015,0.000113349255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024529218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026779198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99244416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022627565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003046909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03995967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998590636","doi":"10.1007/s10464-010-9374-1","title":"Understanding Interdisciplinary Collaborations as Social Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Community Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social network analysis; Institution; Sociology; Centrality; Public relations; Social network (sociolinguistics); Psychological intervention; Network dynamics; Health psychology; Field (mathematics); Dynamics (music); Population; Public health; Social science; Psychology; Social capital; Political science; Medicine; Pedagogy; Nursing","score_opus":0.7427404181271681,"score_gpt":0.651328028731233,"score_spread":0.0914123893959351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998590636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6755162,0.006523163,0.22375116,0.012571993,0.00023907215,0.0005700749,0.0010524448,0.00029655208,0.07947932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96055156,0.0018707422,0.034831557,0.00018270545,0.0000848363,0.0002317459,0.00029480207,0.000021222448,0.0019308394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.994228,0.0038169282,0.00022206204,0.000637738,0.00076796504,0.00032716733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96978843,0.02031617,0.0050659473,0.0021193023,0.0012990122,0.0014112018],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045420565,0.00041987,0.0005933769,0.007259873,0.0026695847,0.0074437177,0.0011231477,0.0011885716,0.0042016474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023539903,0.00038287073,0.0005881495,0.00846771,0.0045776977,0.01824693,0.004003315,0.001152115,0.00044418915],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014459017,0.00023877773,0.1549463,0.00095977733,0.00037060824,0.00077387714,0.051069804,0.019820128,0.0026933886,0.611181,0.0046411776,0.15316054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036039834,0.00014056684,0.088921174,0.00037269227,0.000091351336,0.0007416396,0.046350893,0.036615327,0.00058515195,0.7489289,0.07712173,0.00009453777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028397713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038215707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99274015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002534928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016018602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02402097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998888254","doi":"10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0","title":"Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foot (prosody); Productivity; Gross domestic product; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Population; Demography; Ankle; Geography; Library science; Environmental health; Economic growth; Economics; Surgery","score_opus":0.7032713158779151,"score_gpt":0.6259661561505094,"score_spread":0.0773051597274057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998888254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90926844,0.034713604,0.0013545926,0.0015949855,0.00013232337,0.00017004841,0.040625315,0.00018184177,0.011958759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626768,0.016120808,0.0018214864,0.000118226075,0.00024492762,0.00016387647,0.017970728,0.00003404141,0.00084915536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901177,0.0009894781,0.0029764224,0.00081448536,0.0046874466,0.00041441532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584158,0.013081462,0.01721027,0.001136724,0.00870693,0.0014488995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057478943,0.00042740893,0.0011611908,0.08190776,0.00076553185,0.003711999,0.00085642684,0.0005335418,0.0019399602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032825842,0.0001986248,0.0017435721,0.12166665,0.0006678973,0.0028996305,0.0021836555,0.00046345475,0.00071800716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015370245,0.00005877395,0.9350566,0.0029261175,0.0012699453,0.00037466784,0.0010761177,0.000867278,0.00039951346,0.0006606463,0.004098087,0.053058553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010443382,0.00005493106,0.9874391,0.0005420625,0.00043610495,0.00061674626,0.0013056163,0.0010123482,0.00026253972,0.00051276066,0.007778428,0.000028925828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056852223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006050228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022147356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027381957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03039819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000638786","doi":"10.1258/135581903322405108","title":"Convergent evolution: The academic and policy roots of collaborative research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.47665753135336614,"score_gpt":0.6811280939698202,"score_spread":0.20447056261645408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000638786","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038317812,0.008759089,0.0006521234,0.10740896,0.88129926,0.000020997748,0.000069966394,0.000076590935,0.0013299601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045946254,0.0075891945,0.0006164578,0.017650798,0.9669462,0.000046919755,0.00004491984,0.000054485357,0.0024563828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98847324,0.0039985394,0.0014542318,0.0011430861,0.004403255,0.0005276919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7616141,0.19528468,0.00435474,0.004460538,0.028232982,0.006052984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026861953,0.0021372421,0.0037173177,0.0047032335,0.0046588564,0.018309696,0.005663065,0.016932374,0.005829143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13326861,0.0011561646,0.0020633442,0.0040022884,0.009076173,0.007505027,0.002484416,0.019594362,0.0017980181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008612894,0.000022523556,0.00018396108,0.00054137484,0.000100624085,0.00032765188,0.00025626813,0.000081608334,0.0000826301,0.004098396,0.97797215,0.016246589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031839745,0.000060482704,0.0025496709,0.0019450379,0.00047961273,0.00082023785,0.0011596937,0.0011096379,0.00050334097,0.038797032,0.9521231,0.0001338496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023475906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079226615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034313875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00565467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1420613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001213194","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4","title":"Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Forschungszentrum Jülich; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"China; Regional science; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Library science; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Point (geometry); Geography; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5650881049249804,"score_gpt":0.5968205699851685,"score_spread":0.03173246506018812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001213194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658307,0.010965445,0.0014969493,0.024761029,0.00021240594,0.00005930891,0.00059076643,0.000029492385,0.09605379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593914,0.0020266133,0.00052984967,0.00039876497,0.00011042263,0.000019696294,0.00012872611,0.000009165045,0.0008375876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485034,0.0014728945,0.00063773745,0.0005504602,0.001718161,0.0007704035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945222,0.023234334,0.018588345,0.002274445,0.006465456,0.004215486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010158188,0.00022961834,0.00065522006,0.007546537,0.0018440586,0.00779989,0.0010028606,0.001430013,0.008485757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997784,0.0002448012,0.0006798646,0.01980637,0.0034229562,0.008101041,0.0036564732,0.001867582,0.0005054228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022962342,0.00014752331,0.83548063,0.00070382055,0.0003874206,0.00059043383,0.014849742,0.000264898,0.000429844,0.045587007,0.0035187977,0.09781033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026599535,0.000068259105,0.90054023,0.00082357996,0.000270488,0.0005490659,0.058508772,0.0006365572,0.00047838132,0.018180683,0.019880177,0.00003706875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069215475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0114198895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99245346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019226879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004386581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053722262},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2001302201","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.131","title":"Publishing as a Vocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Ideology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Service (business); Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Public relations; Law; Social science; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.5157213604975961,"score_gpt":0.5415540772126118,"score_spread":0.025832716715015747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001302201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03759367,0.010727267,0.009843203,0.20822865,0.017063646,0.0001315699,0.00015004176,0.00018877638,0.7160732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7594814,0.006417986,0.0058793365,0.041400068,0.013493071,0.0002488467,0.00022512539,0.0003740145,0.17248014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725051,0.014966138,0.0012836643,0.0020853302,0.006195714,0.0029640272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95675755,0.022358926,0.004611001,0.0049793446,0.004572575,0.0067206216],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013259388,0.00035899284,0.000661559,0.0014136895,0.010373874,0.029487878,0.0015062253,0.0060994145,0.007836068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043376908,0.00025375155,0.0004834982,0.003130287,0.021281978,0.015734466,0.007859012,0.0068527707,0.002832729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030039131,0.000046073466,0.00064937363,0.00010018613,0.00000817447,0.00021211487,0.021887945,0.000104493505,0.00023051612,0.8893388,0.059435017,0.0279573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050895505,0.000029203302,0.00049150817,0.000116916075,0.000003377843,0.00020307332,0.006302093,0.00010522562,0.00027451589,0.08020325,0.91224796,0.000017838789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009242411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001265965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97051215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005435706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008263747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070123136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001642110","doi":"10.1080/08109021003676367","title":"The immediate practical implication of the Houghton Report: provide Green open access now","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Publishing; Order (exchange); Yield (engineering); Scientific publishing; Political science; Library science; Positive economics; Economics; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6062874221191252,"score_gpt":0.6517568788808888,"score_spread":0.045469456761763616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001642110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004368683,0.0017637041,0.0062156525,0.94103396,0.0060356823,0.000039543032,0.00026438397,0.00008795121,0.040190466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23664173,0.0043411423,0.028568268,0.63285387,0.01092394,0.00037391056,0.0002654963,0.00029876552,0.085732855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981857,0.0053904266,0.0008642915,0.002368571,0.008201867,0.001317825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9053017,0.065869264,0.002576077,0.005217151,0.017267184,0.0037686594],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02010978,0.0007215999,0.0006090817,0.0011368727,0.0033053963,0.010479376,0.0022037893,0.014386528,0.022577597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102555364,0.00043687213,0.0008534864,0.001632631,0.0077486886,0.019516408,0.0054742126,0.015509354,0.005064391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016132071,0.000091927854,0.0013665993,0.00020559359,0.00003150872,0.00023714206,0.00084070425,0.00067941914,0.00043122613,0.5163694,0.4532832,0.026302006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007925723,0.0001309965,0.0017005415,0.00031868767,0.000054496137,0.00031763816,0.0022372808,0.001876705,0.0025482825,0.3300236,0.66055775,0.00015468671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007633966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064984728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99779624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036756583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00798052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10635197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002166221","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1432-2","title":"The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Political science; Order (exchange); Production (economics); Business; Economics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.3818642461742465,"score_gpt":0.49254159140057985,"score_spread":0.11067734522633332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002166221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59744,0.03705522,0.0009942045,0.13203779,0.0007028219,0.00007721764,0.0036029774,0.00010006028,0.22798966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874944,0.004314107,0.0003227904,0.0014483193,0.00006494688,0.000010397408,0.00027940777,0.000026428515,0.0060390453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920827,0.00070079294,0.00021052039,0.00041246772,0.003227213,0.0033662566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97569215,0.00352443,0.0021573396,0.00037378204,0.01276613,0.00548618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033197997,0.0002649639,0.0007066682,0.007639368,0.009094396,0.01524341,0.0017216754,0.0014330333,0.0059579136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018345337,0.0002297136,0.0006059498,0.017885698,0.0061273645,0.0033546123,0.0036841913,0.0023025188,0.00037551986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006624419,0.00018209519,0.42197144,0.00083990156,0.00031359657,0.0010447113,0.018903602,0.0021242623,0.0010459012,0.31891072,0.07059358,0.16340783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008631053,0.00007395574,0.6952989,0.0020272583,0.00045828227,0.00032238223,0.086001806,0.0018744633,0.0012816021,0.014300231,0.19809313,0.00018172382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99322283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1301396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23836403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94423336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002849679","doi":"10.1087/0953151053585019","title":"Open access — the impact of legislative developments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Research Councils UK; Wellcome Trust; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislature; Stakeholder; Political science; Period (music); Regional science; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.83959312744279,"score_gpt":0.6915954124791795,"score_spread":0.14799771496361047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002849679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.142313,0.03760748,0.0056967037,0.47263363,0.005274107,0.00013862898,0.001102507,0.0002414541,0.33499247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91512114,0.01285636,0.0029513277,0.04480941,0.004301967,0.00012859583,0.00040040276,0.00014273248,0.019288044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510721,0.01913031,0.003142031,0.0033635807,0.018674904,0.0046170484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69027996,0.22733518,0.020552015,0.013379749,0.037701286,0.010751794],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05946596,0.00026821854,0.0004724192,0.0059735705,0.0035271607,0.018735196,0.0024826948,0.005962174,0.013413677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16465981,0.00040301718,0.0008535002,0.0072092894,0.008124178,0.013196493,0.006892807,0.0069694924,0.0008902933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020080405,0.00016071877,0.0055450676,0.0005844904,0.000047433274,0.00034919597,0.002444383,0.0007219978,0.0007473879,0.8741181,0.03180315,0.08327734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008810499,0.00036708245,0.044914804,0.002715039,0.000072199735,0.00046467892,0.0060633193,0.0015293069,0.002530283,0.11390893,0.82720286,0.00014333295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00747298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078034005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011789543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31448984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003199334","doi":"10.1108/ajim-11-2013-0127","title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Originality; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3448193613516742,"score_gpt":0.5221124057526471,"score_spread":0.17729304440097288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003199334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764916,0.005431175,0.08616781,0.0032149723,0.00072987983,0.002089802,0.008301587,0.0010457698,0.12810306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323214,0.001414011,0.0588419,0.00015771973,0.00030644186,0.0011005799,0.002288368,0.00015207227,0.0034174244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830593,0.005059824,0.001989745,0.0008535424,0.008597993,0.0004396355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415221,0.027823031,0.010448408,0.003512084,0.015042775,0.001651656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457422,0.00077374384,0.00086780277,0.04085487,0.0016518114,0.008796259,0.00055876136,0.00054200925,0.006273436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047920246,0.00017279417,0.0011867016,0.035931047,0.0017832188,0.004335833,0.002496818,0.00092777784,0.0008249961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000561509,0.0005817932,0.26172802,0.0049543697,0.0009298589,0.00060381467,0.01933276,0.0028235163,0.008001667,0.0709055,0.0188677,0.61070955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000598912,0.0010978347,0.77767086,0.0015970995,0.00059308525,0.001345498,0.033545423,0.013674147,0.0074801883,0.05030896,0.11227243,0.0003546198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015542442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012404113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023237837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028176687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07707673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003282201","doi":"10.1038/nj7369-419a","title":"The athletes of science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Psychology; Medicine; Physical therapy","score_opus":0.544480304666041,"score_gpt":0.577908947804228,"score_spread":0.03342864313818694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003282201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065833256,0.009824414,0.0035405045,0.27476403,0.006790427,0.00007062112,0.00039257706,0.0001087324,0.6386754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7275735,0.007958729,0.0024013747,0.05164741,0.008773775,0.00019528838,0.00041033028,0.0001928305,0.20084673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911409,0.0037877576,0.0002437477,0.0009839328,0.002496693,0.0013469972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98020786,0.0061657857,0.0022115225,0.001953212,0.0031579917,0.0063036266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074255606,0.00045422063,0.0007626964,0.0055038948,0.011290171,0.014705506,0.0011759789,0.0041739885,0.027161647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026405936,0.00035246316,0.0004626338,0.0049404977,0.019849988,0.010424643,0.007415723,0.005758267,0.0042205453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000857987,0.000099220895,0.011555728,0.00017437007,0.000054033564,0.00016573517,0.016569953,0.00015229847,0.00032922518,0.7163701,0.1663254,0.08811813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023407149,0.000074190946,0.010651624,0.00034215927,0.000019858722,0.00022212235,0.017917845,0.00029171436,0.0002034012,0.200969,0.7692541,0.00003064179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005359235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011289826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029939488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007049476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09086478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004098455","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6","title":"Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Network structure; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Knowledge management; Field (mathematics); Network analysis; Biotechnology; Business; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.11364746930551028,"score_gpt":0.46945445948011494,"score_spread":0.35580699017460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004098455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97972417,0.00046924516,0.0001841408,0.0021136918,0.00000777356,0.000026500964,0.0005227789,0.000020096331,0.016931463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979704,0.00018199772,0.000117451105,0.000039093116,0.0000029171094,0.0000041872468,0.00012589926,0.0000023570003,0.0015556457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980388,0.00034225572,0.00006828051,0.00017822631,0.00050774426,0.0008646346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854917,0.0054636165,0.0015262594,0.0002688459,0.0038966371,0.0033528924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020025221,0.00022113093,0.00051544816,0.003558956,0.0059433733,0.0053543346,0.0013782851,0.0011615775,0.0057622185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012307711,0.00020745677,0.00046881204,0.0066085435,0.0026869476,0.0016987191,0.0024669983,0.00114419,0.00036716857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074721675,0.00041977543,0.8588631,0.00024607434,0.00031075414,0.0018479608,0.007813633,0.032413937,0.0010101025,0.038333416,0.0085931355,0.049400873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026413225,0.00015030538,0.8973914,0.00020887467,0.000378234,0.00025695478,0.040652703,0.03622686,0.0010309676,0.006561502,0.016763136,0.000114945455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99347717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99799746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064481094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08379865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46784526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2004681724","doi":"10.1108/14666180010382563","title":"Trends in publishing academic grey literature: examples from economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Grey Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Electronic publishing; Work (physics); Grey literature; Library science; Academic community; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; The Internet; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.30387528167475375,"score_gpt":0.49843165783108323,"score_spread":0.19455637615632948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004681724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.640256,0.093371406,0.0144725265,0.08397278,0.0013070857,0.00023052056,0.0013330538,0.0003053335,0.16475129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92990047,0.04895046,0.009108914,0.0023431247,0.0011898865,0.00008102802,0.0006345625,0.00014296097,0.0076485532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924339,0.0020534112,0.0009160807,0.00062362733,0.0035100142,0.0004629177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8977972,0.064585224,0.012512138,0.0046980567,0.01797204,0.0024352483],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013726244,0.00021578395,0.00045346076,0.0126797445,0.002223349,0.008241237,0.0008006632,0.0019040257,0.004497159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060491942,0.00023941416,0.00045039522,0.03292689,0.0030333109,0.008241054,0.002995451,0.0013998016,0.00082119845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064988004,0.00016188971,0.093131185,0.0030916322,0.00013785705,0.0032512292,0.06892556,0.0012658379,0.0021853487,0.19429474,0.03635676,0.59654814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090828515,0.00029208756,0.19575545,0.0031226445,0.00014977333,0.003562922,0.058386963,0.0023313425,0.0030237434,0.13699338,0.5960971,0.00019374125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021644568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032155593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98732024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002628577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022719523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0725922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004997499","doi":"10.1080/00210862.2012.703486","title":"Iran's “Twenty-Year Vision Document”: An Outlook on Science and Technology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iranian Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Ranking (information retrieval); Plan (archaeology); Investment (military); Regional science; Political science; Economic growth; Geography; Computer science; Economics; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.5430716102093517,"score_gpt":0.6059603007241307,"score_spread":0.06288869051477897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004997499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062292207,0.15587011,0.008506467,0.24561097,0.06708797,0.000842267,0.021384193,0.0020727327,0.43633306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.409135,0.16437441,0.059562422,0.028671449,0.009943876,0.0011339207,0.044920955,0.00044425752,0.28181374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783736,0.0001981826,0.00013457454,0.000077366596,0.0012615666,0.0004909468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807656,0.00009731593,0.0002138917,0.0000502142,0.0010799114,0.00048210297],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049918476,0.0011031511,0.0004671372,0.0049932525,0.0018826805,0.0052478644,0.00097469595,0.002333529,0.004656007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029139319,0.00026019712,0.00054056366,0.00491987,0.00077052886,0.0024604683,0.0020077226,0.0026261653,0.0032126734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017183187,0.00019892567,0.0048177633,0.0008051678,0.000041105362,0.00031679147,0.00052657706,0.00078713446,0.001400157,0.05412729,0.7424717,0.19433558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019126639,0.00010208089,0.011983246,0.00017806723,0.000013291867,0.0001381813,0.0005640301,0.00019642149,0.00046429888,0.0028027592,0.9835065,0.000031905238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037395194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030038636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99500674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008072144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032666903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074355006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005092147","doi":"10.1097/bot.0b013e3181aa2182","title":"Leading 20 at 20: Top Cited Articles and Authors in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1987-2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Web of science; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Library science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.27155190953005054,"score_gpt":0.4721341778059648,"score_spread":0.20058226827591424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005092147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024555668,0.97172517,0.000100371784,0.0007834538,0.00046044207,0.000063814485,0.0010389233,0.000016167545,0.0012559493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12532638,0.8680942,0.001265599,0.0010966638,0.0011228332,0.00018034682,0.0019467588,0.000019296709,0.000947893],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927549,0.00088226644,0.0023357898,0.00046620157,0.003282364,0.00027857473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96476835,0.011764227,0.013599147,0.00022265204,0.008712056,0.00093350693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052704406,0.00086177106,0.0013770491,0.038364578,0.0007200595,0.003339766,0.0009116095,0.001059539,0.001981603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027267773,0.0005097144,0.0014462308,0.036535226,0.0006825471,0.00298623,0.0010967196,0.0006285896,0.00071698223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013375856,0.0001663881,0.17967488,0.25488436,0.0034272443,0.0032970256,0.003987429,0.0003531147,0.002755341,0.0011342046,0.030495716,0.5184868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020266882,0.0007743132,0.70498127,0.13320677,0.008622869,0.017013134,0.004309558,0.00024546796,0.0020386723,0.0007271731,0.12776485,0.00011323926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005936695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136433225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026971162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006850383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02787304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005315027","doi":"10.1007/s11051-012-1060-9","title":"Nanotechnology research among some leading OIC member states","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nanoparticle Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Islamic republic; Annual growth %; Middle East; Index (typography); Islam; Political science; Agricultural economics; Geography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.8297510743152176,"score_gpt":0.6750296303968406,"score_spread":0.15472144391837694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005315027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.763977,0.017619262,0.00045000587,0.016039174,0.000678004,0.00009303419,0.003350284,0.000074651274,0.19771855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639333,0.008378032,0.00068237516,0.0016255546,0.00028439309,0.000056900208,0.0012096295,0.000023776225,0.023806084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850684,0.00013055225,0.000101282836,0.00014891289,0.00056954945,0.0005428468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074835,0.0020315207,0.0011733474,0.00032429476,0.0037476784,0.0019748143],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022376187,0.0001978202,0.00033158006,0.008803021,0.0021969634,0.0041525234,0.00033476303,0.0008299588,0.006237487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005739869,0.000103433886,0.00024224714,0.016078528,0.0006288451,0.0012582492,0.001377154,0.0006510845,0.0006520045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075508305,0.00037571744,0.5787246,0.0012793809,0.00023833795,0.001172664,0.008313209,0.00044222525,0.0047464296,0.044491727,0.06051902,0.29894152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032816824,0.00014236692,0.5998753,0.0005522413,0.0002014185,0.00040843748,0.015559114,0.0004143076,0.0026821503,0.0021266073,0.37796196,0.000043292515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020540375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028866556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031597235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007267228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04084164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005360619","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1501371112","title":"Reply to Margalida and Colomer: Science should strive to prevent mistakes, not corrections","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Center for Research Resources","keywords":"Mistake; Index (typography); Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5928842124102478,"score_gpt":0.5447901255417091,"score_spread":0.048094086868538666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005360619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006966781,0.00031521718,0.000044510456,0.99198854,0.00704762,0.0000049673877,0.000029766887,0.000013227368,0.00048647614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008255161,0.0001618348,0.000094370946,0.9908987,0.0062536327,0.000015291955,0.000009990888,0.000011617874,0.0017291082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322754,0.0015683721,0.0008416459,0.001095345,0.0024671438,0.00080000435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729604,0.0149634285,0.00143632,0.0011477363,0.005303911,0.0041880934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012026123,0.00090775726,0.0020655242,0.0010134783,0.0072123725,0.0057767564,0.0033688038,0.08512292,0.006904662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06993976,0.0013438719,0.0014935647,0.0012375648,0.007256492,0.0069215014,0.0034435946,0.08435045,0.008444936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022838196,0.000010662722,0.00021024399,0.000017234013,0.000009258758,0.00017093596,0.00009072498,0.000018076082,0.00004159119,0.002046705,0.9949151,0.002446563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013547576,0.00004571297,0.0015290639,0.0002953663,0.000038402733,0.0008243671,0.00064867997,0.00035698857,0.0003478424,0.019512191,0.97614163,0.00012432948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009940759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017345008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98797387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054825265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010161899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06360096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006242952","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.007","title":"Death of a Small Journal?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Citation; History; Recipe; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6375061667817558,"score_gpt":0.5179158316989042,"score_spread":0.11959033508285155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006242952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013235972,0.015612431,0.002577892,0.89905834,0.0380976,0.000051977946,0.00017648558,0.0003364771,0.030852849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23341134,0.03016537,0.0064245993,0.576679,0.0544543,0.00020232168,0.0005709796,0.00078803004,0.09730409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341536,0.0020400272,0.0006849526,0.0008547451,0.0021595056,0.0008453939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9123939,0.014476071,0.0070261275,0.005986918,0.020700706,0.039416164],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154113425,0.00037754377,0.0010082383,0.0018528617,0.0050774734,0.012767882,0.0015099266,0.0055268295,0.017225461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10151255,0.00029577574,0.000706442,0.0015137388,0.008895583,0.012747763,0.0046922844,0.007810824,0.013430575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023343207,0.00014425674,0.008395828,0.0005121774,0.00008758814,0.0020508913,0.0027007016,0.00007106875,0.00066769356,0.056317065,0.7796465,0.1491728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006848776,0.00024063363,0.005317035,0.00088684337,0.00004089455,0.004639518,0.0066639576,0.00012376955,0.00044039683,0.06124557,0.9202513,0.00008140868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008448908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013103625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021242737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005941404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08150399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006476814","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0006283","title":"Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Affect (linguistics); MEDLINE; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6961187704027095,"score_gpt":0.5726476699662775,"score_spread":0.12347110043643206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006476814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98138165,0.0021349688,0.004602837,0.0033763607,0.0003033035,0.00009620823,0.00022481084,0.0001227573,0.007757058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955943,0.00033973594,0.0017253478,0.00044672357,0.00016609803,0.000031420455,0.000101126956,0.000028031049,0.0015673286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626817,0.0227742,0.0039798995,0.0028308819,0.0064458842,0.0012874643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46041426,0.3434249,0.12852155,0.019042524,0.03500466,0.013592087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032110233,0.00027498743,0.00075757876,0.0018436312,0.0010377923,0.0034657726,0.00073360046,0.0012803491,0.004225279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21538371,0.00024806874,0.00041769765,0.0019152837,0.00071992324,0.0013707732,0.0009210391,0.00081358367,0.0018110151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006198838,0.00024855632,0.95195603,0.00032061938,0.00023209283,0.00017956719,0.0028424964,0.00019984826,0.0028299121,0.00025468518,0.0017156838,0.038600508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006868592,0.00070940657,0.9844906,0.000116469775,0.00020437728,0.00068410236,0.002722864,0.0017153311,0.0022557862,0.0011738813,0.0057885777,0.00006985837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019115246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032255258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99815637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080397254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015425745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16981715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006611611","doi":"10.1007/s12109-007-9010-6","title":"Assessing the Diffusion and Impact of Grey Literature Published by International Intergovernmental Scientific Groups: The Case of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publishing Research Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Publication; Publishing; Citation; General partnership; Scientific literature; Library science; Systematic review; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.2842349238444869,"score_gpt":0.4885530279506889,"score_spread":0.204318104106202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006611611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454615,0.0023818873,0.0015505669,0.008876013,0.00004647907,0.00008445563,0.00027881138,0.000034796707,0.041285522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976084,0.00053662894,0.00077915034,0.00011149967,0.000032653385,0.000014620024,0.00010234615,0.0000070835763,0.00080756925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98217154,0.0061613363,0.0011277561,0.0010877945,0.008293767,0.001157884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6316526,0.31098428,0.019789996,0.0072670314,0.025982443,0.0043236166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03697771,0.00034539428,0.000816078,0.022640668,0.0029534623,0.010622841,0.0017133695,0.0038194312,0.0035686756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17559284,0.000291028,0.00074225565,0.022146577,0.0044828486,0.008515883,0.0055377195,0.0018362391,0.00026162274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012226254,0.00056636124,0.511558,0.001895577,0.0012659592,0.00549857,0.052352313,0.031422153,0.0044631343,0.17968132,0.007727584,0.20234647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032028003,0.0005549374,0.6931208,0.001626119,0.0010407296,0.00070729124,0.078462854,0.05654349,0.0037135158,0.11616601,0.04752563,0.00021834056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046720102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044388782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97735935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012395045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009410167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19555914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007038115","doi":"10.7553/77-2-59","title":"How to overcome some of the challenges that African scholars are facing in conducting informetrics research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Limiting; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.729042384110194,"score_gpt":0.4777192867828101,"score_spread":0.25132309732738384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007038115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017153043,0.023848092,0.048257418,0.8813863,0.005438038,0.00055709033,0.00016317032,0.00036304825,0.022833865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30251354,0.06148313,0.47603825,0.13417926,0.0064149215,0.0028755632,0.00038009306,0.00050919,0.015606026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9054705,0.072385214,0.006306479,0.0032418857,0.00912267,0.0034732064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66487527,0.23312481,0.018272102,0.022219274,0.051398057,0.010110469],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17106928,0.0011916101,0.0020385396,0.011437565,0.01570556,0.034689248,0.0032772804,0.009526205,0.0062989094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26171815,0.001088863,0.0011578867,0.012340604,0.017984804,0.034785423,0.01284773,0.009472336,0.0050092693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015815467,0.00039858712,0.015879275,0.01261937,0.00039442687,0.0017140526,0.12700118,0.0017356123,0.0036776199,0.18235335,0.11345735,0.540611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008082196,0.00013233234,0.0063852994,0.012935724,0.000116505114,0.0010876956,0.1998083,0.0011992647,0.0025124017,0.25532743,0.52017236,0.00024195136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077993143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010796283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98856246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050388426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0571668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007457296","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.12128","title":"Bien ancrée, mais à la conquête de nouveaux sommets : la croissance de l’AUC","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19783529150550716,"score_gpt":0.4526165855803671,"score_spread":0.25478129407485994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007457296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0249202,0.02076893,0.004569223,0.7380841,0.039079163,0.000092989874,0.0004595005,0.00045311413,0.17157283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17091784,0.015091074,0.003344461,0.088470265,0.005675515,0.000093802475,0.00051887217,0.0014961401,0.71439207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951568,0.0010286255,0.0001359773,0.0007415578,0.0015033692,0.0014335839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346245,0.0009289765,0.0006383243,0.00063971407,0.0056410115,0.008689563],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044807103,0.0006837372,0.0006415246,0.0007676858,0.018811308,0.015501305,0.001939615,0.003915835,0.039025713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013390789,0.0005565632,0.0005155661,0.0011190787,0.01036777,0.007435749,0.0062368717,0.01367509,0.009749584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554612,0.00007662761,0.0055099083,0.00029099625,0.000031566175,0.00073548936,0.033628423,0.00017079328,0.0018966558,0.09334353,0.78289646,0.08116407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004444614,0.000015194053,0.0021432547,0.00016410672,0.0000050748154,0.000107551066,0.011032788,0.00004179574,0.00016214981,0.002171541,0.9841256,0.000026431357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5242856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7003281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019129789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049017437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9570319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008693071","doi":"10.1108/03074800510587354","title":"Participation in the global knowledge commons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Interoperability; Originality; Dissemination; Public relations; Business; Publishing; Information Dissemination; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Commons; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.5602271843494625,"score_gpt":0.5868514926554681,"score_spread":0.026624308306005595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008693071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19481227,0.007621608,0.008030634,0.074321695,0.00085109635,0.00022147487,0.00022920847,0.00015163254,0.7137604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96628296,0.0030324557,0.0017692898,0.003733333,0.0005656217,0.00017780169,0.00016423235,0.000058375623,0.024215963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738435,0.016224394,0.00064631767,0.0017072235,0.004673053,0.0029055837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507524,0.030889552,0.0039702267,0.0054949434,0.0018769474,0.0070158313],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017154127,0.00034445347,0.00075437804,0.0034423282,0.006205687,0.022211336,0.0015678431,0.0033458981,0.016465813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029252307,0.00018634905,0.000608947,0.005629371,0.014491597,0.014748417,0.025240384,0.0023757627,0.0013051305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007847199,0.00016577133,0.01820639,0.00065430603,0.00006510621,0.00067722733,0.087858155,0.0006872738,0.00054679526,0.72618496,0.020578759,0.14429675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025226178,0.000047372716,0.006953375,0.0008224,0.00002645512,0.00039203966,0.07819776,0.00033613582,0.00029046607,0.28017,0.6327098,0.000029086039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017257631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017948613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99843216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033085996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010271544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09072077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010214524","doi":"10.1007/s10508-006-8990-1","title":"The Impact Factor: The Archives Breaks From the Pack","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Impact factor; Environmental health; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.3252310240052838,"score_gpt":0.5420066977776841,"score_spread":0.21677567377240026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010214524","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004963287,0.0059817676,0.00032339583,0.06189185,0.93074787,0.000009457163,0.000043612657,0.00007384261,0.0008786509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00083884504,0.0038669335,0.00028843127,0.019745624,0.9710343,0.000017460396,0.000028028846,0.000087721106,0.0040925792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877885,0.0028573703,0.0017133288,0.0013486801,0.00581638,0.00047576448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046598,0.057023045,0.0034766155,0.003658015,0.026018728,0.0051639024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01975035,0.004000491,0.00589477,0.008914223,0.006154821,0.01759837,0.004718752,0.01918832,0.008963812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0853687,0.0021032058,0.002341238,0.0056431317,0.01029721,0.009304151,0.0026846128,0.02691672,0.007737588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019768271,0.0000074984114,0.000027730779,0.00014670657,0.000016886848,0.000042215892,0.000032308584,0.000021291022,0.000034110806,0.0011028385,0.9922483,0.006300458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051808758,0.000027941105,0.00041429358,0.0005780319,0.000084366875,0.00017444267,0.00014598796,0.00025607957,0.00016089503,0.0072480007,0.9907987,0.000059437905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030183496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008004357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99108577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039645177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004546023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10445106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011285045","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.195","title":"Two-Faced at the Interface: Meditations on the Manuscript Review Committee","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Interface (matter); Process (computing); Research integrity; Editorial board; Academic integrity; Library science; Business; Political science; Management; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Economics; Operating system","score_opus":0.5769549932795691,"score_gpt":0.5507350731102838,"score_spread":0.026219920169285316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011285045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065944837,0.0053639775,0.02665537,0.90284926,0.039328318,0.000095698226,0.00002963383,0.00029187047,0.018791396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30985147,0.0064183744,0.043942317,0.50701046,0.069960095,0.0007404315,0.00007090508,0.001702891,0.06030303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8867627,0.08493362,0.003067669,0.0069483216,0.014117212,0.0041705454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74339914,0.1534383,0.016287401,0.021987563,0.037636552,0.02725101],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11864755,0.00087589613,0.0009460868,0.0028404896,0.025907023,0.020274332,0.0033642887,0.012836317,0.007085491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31490633,0.0014250347,0.001433195,0.0017907575,0.03987914,0.021521026,0.014924721,0.04876115,0.0042838063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003117516,0.00017829056,0.0017504792,0.00029064793,0.00016228201,0.00057722535,0.11433513,0.00038540523,0.0016237034,0.14025939,0.6601977,0.07992798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011295135,0.000108790424,0.0011558763,0.00058937375,0.00004754497,0.0005027992,0.03222595,0.00069561193,0.0011487076,0.10143443,0.86179584,0.00018208078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002951653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055942605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97972566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008465203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014440725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62747574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011442237","doi":"10.1017/s1551929510991177","title":"Impact Factor, My Donkey!","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Donkey; Statistic; Phenomenon; Impact factor; Publishing; Factor (programming language); Scientific publishing; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; History; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4094731391342617,"score_gpt":0.6032809874793786,"score_spread":0.19380784834511694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011442237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013580939,0.0687667,0.011092069,0.6521874,0.18095186,0.00007307774,0.0024383431,0.002314721,0.08081775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08239825,0.15098353,0.029975757,0.29757825,0.2190698,0.0005289171,0.0030926687,0.004788265,0.21158458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897765,0.0020793309,0.00088703475,0.0011552582,0.0055937516,0.00050817884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561441,0.013858137,0.0033485831,0.003943816,0.01790843,0.004797022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119292885,0.0017242457,0.002104899,0.0053804554,0.003109919,0.014573857,0.002005073,0.0049084234,0.05814128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10329177,0.000788178,0.0010299418,0.008097375,0.008862752,0.018321767,0.00424863,0.012976048,0.055429492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007065421,0.000019305437,0.0007952739,0.00037128775,0.00004109293,0.000053937696,0.00011951628,0.0000665542,0.00016598064,0.0340612,0.8681556,0.09607958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025258467,0.000054872417,0.0012334925,0.0007820161,0.000039861337,0.00028168358,0.0002583427,0.00011845639,0.0002752219,0.0692721,0.92759806,0.000060641105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024347943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021064216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99461955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031187478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035630544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19450194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012533003","doi":"10.1128/iai.00018-09","title":"Is Peer Review Censorship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Infection and Immunity","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Biology; Virology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5778104572087954,"score_gpt":0.6152475294336978,"score_spread":0.037437072224902335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012533003","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049798124,0.014913535,0.00033317134,0.25079086,0.7318658,0.000011485103,0.00003747366,0.00007145698,0.001926521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001455943,0.009334498,0.00015685662,0.07920628,0.90468025,0.000020733894,0.000019631541,0.00005781896,0.0050679934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781839,0.0064895693,0.0022747954,0.0024642681,0.009788034,0.0007994019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88091445,0.07144035,0.005840944,0.004497361,0.03166842,0.0056385747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023250317,0.0019371271,0.0038024834,0.0025731947,0.004684009,0.013278103,0.00523233,0.027948322,0.006836036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13397147,0.0010600237,0.001886558,0.0022116303,0.00967403,0.0099445935,0.0022097605,0.032394044,0.006937278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011116115,0.0000036432925,0.000020635582,0.00012302888,0.000015568992,0.000048078924,0.00002978412,0.000013557494,0.000016096436,0.0016083834,0.9932749,0.0048352424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029331546,0.000016528555,0.00016388195,0.00047578546,0.00003479097,0.00017850005,0.00007011414,0.00014171092,0.0000936276,0.006328657,0.9924354,0.000031708092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026376909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045141405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97674966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043287184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058596386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122960865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013123505","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.257","title":"The Relationship between Scholarly Communication and Science and Technology Studies (STS)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Scientific communication; Perspective (graphical); Publishing; Social science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Science communication; Science studies; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Science education; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.7096535341488244,"score_gpt":0.5563160358039946,"score_spread":0.1533374983448298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013123505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20468931,0.18433295,0.036998145,0.13275166,0.0029006011,0.00020218643,0.0006202374,0.00020455237,0.4373004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94077635,0.042332247,0.006053307,0.0026497752,0.003490341,0.00025469725,0.00020149999,0.000067932575,0.0041739666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9222028,0.046106532,0.005658561,0.0042967503,0.01964033,0.002094903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56518096,0.3569801,0.045031305,0.009319977,0.017184062,0.006303593],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032950085,0.00049834396,0.000952577,0.023783028,0.005853029,0.020038763,0.001328901,0.003733726,0.0072361473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15932897,0.00043611877,0.0004640927,0.044896808,0.024329992,0.01906632,0.014974442,0.0038059275,0.0010726567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000861991,0.00010634458,0.036497895,0.002538435,0.00015436627,0.0004476843,0.08962477,0.000612827,0.00036770513,0.69588095,0.00735906,0.16632377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037665093,0.00016943079,0.0761625,0.0045967973,0.00012070026,0.0017085087,0.083533786,0.0010117531,0.000508239,0.54935414,0.28260532,0.00019120052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002665505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016849113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99414694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008388953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074650547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17425883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013259214","doi":"10.1016/s1359-6446(04)03232-5","title":"Cite and oversight","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Drug Discovery Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical sciences; Drug discovery; Engineering ethics; Business; Chemistry; Medicine; Pharmacology; Engineering; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.30718249709904144,"score_gpt":0.485560715432567,"score_spread":0.17837821833352557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013259214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028512746,0.0020287277,0.00016382191,0.9742158,0.009845556,0.000006882705,0.000028707162,0.000018368972,0.013407052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051112026,0.00052972225,0.00011376266,0.9636957,0.01717439,0.000016948832,0.000010830672,0.000016083173,0.013331328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797263,0.0045231236,0.001639482,0.0040093698,0.0073991492,0.0027025128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337075,0.04535001,0.003425189,0.003506278,0.0076411245,0.0063699605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017449915,0.0011088147,0.0025887487,0.0027030346,0.013562845,0.022354582,0.004635956,0.1690099,0.010884356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09076444,0.0014739156,0.0020554203,0.0022885848,0.024003822,0.014154995,0.00628459,0.09359988,0.0073898337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004050103,0.000031115174,0.0004240638,0.00003932685,0.000029568266,0.0005268674,0.00035129598,0.000070060836,0.000079753736,0.06545168,0.9233668,0.009588966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010825955,0.00003441355,0.0012137307,0.00032101307,0.00005522274,0.0005837942,0.0007573958,0.0004879689,0.00022265631,0.15079899,0.8453146,0.00010196419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0305462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06898747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015720116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012472784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11405796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013512258","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.006","title":"A Short Note on Pointless Reference Formatting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Multitude; Simple (philosophy); Envelope (radar); Computer science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.605079677102337,"score_gpt":0.5426055041927842,"score_spread":0.062474172909552816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013512258","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038913402,0.023740172,0.6615759,0.11863708,0.14710703,0.00053499686,0.0013837672,0.0072114184,0.035918318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04426123,0.02728935,0.753172,0.043233063,0.073059626,0.0011116598,0.0025052405,0.0064352937,0.04893253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95459116,0.02101083,0.0054645613,0.0027439883,0.015333314,0.0008560452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.811216,0.09393457,0.006287912,0.031433977,0.05546699,0.0016605351],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042657502,0.0016110068,0.0014031356,0.0054858834,0.0035568126,0.008548254,0.0044255555,0.004820098,0.017368615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2091082,0.0009431918,0.0016025191,0.0077536255,0.0074867723,0.01669551,0.004506384,0.0119150225,0.020758858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030202465,0.00008326584,0.0008463422,0.0010389695,0.00005192596,0.00044640354,0.0014440402,0.0009062728,0.0064696935,0.2332567,0.4032038,0.35195065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042038777,0.00018656295,0.000853774,0.0014099986,0.00004255712,0.00080676057,0.0004592147,0.0019299592,0.0069761397,0.15069035,0.8363936,0.00020891029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020649934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016615703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99145174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00277449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028226946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22559714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013594586","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2008.00004.x","title":"The Canada Research Chairs Program and Social Science Reward Structures","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5843960452577228,"score_gpt":0.5376209272109905,"score_spread":0.04677511804673229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013594586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49676415,0.0045683165,0.0056837564,0.030350655,0.0005520095,0.00045826068,0.0056850496,0.00037203587,0.45556575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916026,0.0016666772,0.0017163868,0.0011040492,0.00016868132,0.00015189494,0.000951501,0.000067840716,0.07814705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98671097,0.0021883454,0.00035562838,0.00096725335,0.0058895317,0.0038883737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210462,0.013135876,0.010815781,0.0028451267,0.024892181,0.027264837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007852203,0.00024881275,0.00048511234,0.005605075,0.004942833,0.006020588,0.0013095745,0.0011137038,0.017911253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05061093,0.00029566014,0.00031633888,0.010237415,0.0025376095,0.0016099004,0.0024715024,0.0012946392,0.0016459078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003940237,0.0002503717,0.3821055,0.00038991333,0.00017620696,0.00035550867,0.011505983,0.0026080098,0.0006595151,0.29511622,0.094714105,0.21172467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077367185,0.00015184077,0.6872367,0.0003110424,0.00011559228,0.00015442516,0.007872195,0.00172471,0.00049536326,0.011874451,0.28990284,0.00008345291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75140625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8712111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037683714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09664867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5001155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014684096","doi":"10.1523/jneurosci.2891-06.2006","title":"Why Open Access to Research and Scholarship?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarly communication; The Internet; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Open science; Internet privacy; Political science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.9152765418193911,"score_gpt":0.7236138818332203,"score_spread":0.19166265998617082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014684096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011077814,0.036478378,0.013738898,0.8202573,0.008779488,0.000064406915,0.00016898841,0.00019862049,0.10923613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63067067,0.056564566,0.010129006,0.20714381,0.054031912,0.0006140249,0.0003384015,0.0005422384,0.03996534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852943,0.028282,0.0025667557,0.004304581,0.021599323,0.004717984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7781796,0.14755283,0.01296332,0.019932976,0.023905,0.017466206],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042939577,0.00046533815,0.0014693596,0.0047026975,0.006296015,0.029200688,0.0029349683,0.020131243,0.027394105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1933265,0.0005583514,0.0012006075,0.006945288,0.049012743,0.062183022,0.019744053,0.015330227,0.0050878585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006901898,0.00006383126,0.0020915528,0.00044756016,0.00003434989,0.0002340598,0.0025768653,0.0001734589,0.00015194032,0.89502746,0.052327685,0.046802305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036892416,0.000033044802,0.0009758253,0.00070366316,0.000016471671,0.00030686695,0.0026334564,0.0002170193,0.00014453323,0.8407571,0.15414077,0.00003432696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003060593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024481893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005973313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009062219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22708887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014988080","doi":"10.3166/ria.23.133-153","title":"ERS, une plate-forme bibliométrique. Présentation d'une plate-forme web de mesure bibliométrique des revues en informatique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d intelligence artificielle","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2564065870589194,"score_gpt":0.4863341707415813,"score_spread":0.22992758368266192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014988080","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024542816,0.01319238,0.48918545,0.016075574,0.006175343,0.00044263876,0.10349545,0.040224075,0.30666623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2068506,0.015908089,0.35688,0.0017915888,0.0029893776,0.0008603222,0.077106215,0.007834896,0.3297789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679106,0.000510125,0.00025464827,0.00037130987,0.0019483146,0.0001245308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368954,0.0020648732,0.00033796893,0.0008317262,0.0028545868,0.00022136299],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017105232,0.0012143638,0.00080106844,0.009758721,0.0009889964,0.006573647,0.0011071,0.0013915322,0.071717724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011308742,0.0007683369,0.0009927725,0.011653154,0.0011926135,0.0045758514,0.0017241882,0.0017449013,0.038004022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005593001,0.00007278812,0.003952371,0.0017050696,0.0002114265,0.00064158876,0.0010517611,0.010379906,0.010893485,0.10728369,0.44859505,0.41465354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035249865,0.000025107182,0.004830215,0.00028177374,0.00003143163,0.0006785818,0.0005048912,0.012050397,0.007974112,0.022052547,0.951438,0.00009764018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020621287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015337909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013204066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012554175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23991966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015995283","doi":"10.1002/asi.22642","title":"Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of <scp>R</scp>ussian science (1993–2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Promotion (chess); Foreign language; Citation; Visibility; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Web of science; Computer science; Profit (economics); Library science; Political science; Business; Mathematics education; Psychology; International trade; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.18620499551599962,"score_gpt":0.5090815274079213,"score_spread":0.3228765318919217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015995283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991871,0.0016762342,0.0001304343,0.0006171515,0.000041003892,0.000007895227,0.00027092034,0.000020905441,0.0053644683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976284,0.00074562867,0.00011643495,0.000056213805,0.000063064275,0.0000067284727,0.00028186358,0.000014764327,0.0010869997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408025,0.002058578,0.000775428,0.0006066426,0.0017500232,0.00072906574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89524686,0.03895827,0.048437435,0.0040189475,0.008626373,0.0047120256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008953296,0.00028495365,0.00040351614,0.0069427798,0.0009926931,0.0047373264,0.0006543086,0.00047888828,0.0026238633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0699306,0.00014302018,0.00059397245,0.014662443,0.001947048,0.0030972045,0.002725242,0.0010716808,0.00056967436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00151998,0.00053315854,0.8839933,0.00030336,0.0005127191,0.00088241854,0.008556924,0.0015776603,0.0013337585,0.004293217,0.0025994855,0.09389396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003481067,0.00021456738,0.9899234,0.000053658114,0.00012899649,0.00016815987,0.003181912,0.00049815956,0.00091611105,0.0006431882,0.004207868,0.000029241122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010524224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012899941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002180985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016956241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04735011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016535985","doi":"10.1140/epjti1","title":"EPJ Techniques and Instrumention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3086645967070091,"score_gpt":0.5418377791957488,"score_spread":0.23317318248873975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016535985","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007975239,0.012931012,0.69672227,0.005733015,0.02185693,0.0028678705,0.009596738,0.029518733,0.21279818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0778669,0.018066157,0.641216,0.006843234,0.0050036865,0.009025259,0.015986979,0.018845169,0.20714669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846618,0.0017123178,0.0016316115,0.0021497912,0.009055424,0.00078898825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842403,0.0031347366,0.0012029958,0.005193164,0.0056343577,0.00059449504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012891418,0.001915725,0.0019664152,0.00720004,0.0029231538,0.007489281,0.005893002,0.0038518438,0.07434891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027792634,0.0018484339,0.0018060964,0.005967444,0.004067875,0.007103615,0.007806103,0.007532394,0.06648197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006784272,0.00020868718,0.001782176,0.004499099,0.00013925355,0.0011323052,0.0014968968,0.0018950135,0.057312656,0.1829884,0.2715723,0.47629488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004900969,0.00013837896,0.0010872325,0.0005301581,0.00005745407,0.0009235662,0.00021362786,0.0019661991,0.03527868,0.01783221,0.94180626,0.00011716987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001240608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009792565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018214884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060880245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2487219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017301591","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y","title":"Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Scientometrics; Impact factor; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Library science; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Information retrieval; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Data mining","score_opus":0.7601598960034236,"score_gpt":0.7056378674837388,"score_spread":0.054522028519684795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017301591","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087118976,0.004531033,0.8361112,0.0020059806,0.0006751197,0.0008105253,0.0046462934,0.008395701,0.05570524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61033237,0.0030873993,0.36416996,0.0004900887,0.001787903,0.00052055763,0.0035925598,0.0014255459,0.014593554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98047763,0.008572438,0.0014283023,0.001723863,0.006963074,0.00083466485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93902,0.034257498,0.00452263,0.007987146,0.013073728,0.0011391245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015377964,0.0018055394,0.0026610645,0.04259148,0.0014657611,0.009096111,0.0017718298,0.0014255478,0.012256967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085758545,0.0005308145,0.0032870532,0.030919857,0.0012600224,0.0069868667,0.002905605,0.0016090914,0.0073291315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019150681,0.00077259867,0.039392766,0.0011928028,0.0015941248,0.0003744424,0.0010081003,0.01530673,0.004835217,0.0536474,0.012388806,0.8692956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016203648,0.0006317167,0.084082164,0.00088759494,0.0016782439,0.00091739086,0.0020866832,0.36909539,0.01403828,0.45543203,0.070570864,0.00041761287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005305769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006065646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98462206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014289607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032762697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132744},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2017314821","doi":"10.4033/iee.2010.3.4.c","title":"Measures of journal quality should separate reviews from original research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich","keywords":"Impact factor; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Systematic review; Computer science; Psychology; Citation; Data science; MEDLINE; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.8259416477983577,"score_gpt":0.6719235061480927,"score_spread":0.15401814165026495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017314821","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20844015,0.046197273,0.60182774,0.03791549,0.012606196,0.012323624,0.011890168,0.005563814,0.06323555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58825374,0.005337697,0.37629002,0.006207825,0.00762312,0.0068894736,0.0034820996,0.0011657402,0.004750304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7481492,0.084467314,0.06506706,0.012168085,0.08679474,0.0033535936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28477803,0.28718582,0.16833425,0.060142267,0.19078456,0.00877514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15211548,0.0021260362,0.005545392,0.026183903,0.0023143697,0.012205366,0.002490982,0.004412702,0.00256934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5629187,0.00150113,0.0029028128,0.02847399,0.0032529985,0.013277954,0.0048914524,0.003229318,0.00317328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022210914,0.0009106344,0.35823074,0.012422814,0.005007568,0.00022054362,0.0048062447,0.002032566,0.00899286,0.029017886,0.040266007,0.535871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006493614,0.002327161,0.7659873,0.0026463377,0.0025289152,0.0008680052,0.002344152,0.009832333,0.016880887,0.088846385,0.10615381,0.0009353658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024498526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032908455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042198976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056452747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80447316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017705528","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.024","title":"Honorary Authorship: Frequency and Associated Factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Articles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medical journal; Rehabilitation; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Multivariate analysis; Listing (finance); Meta-analysis; Family medicine; Psychology; Physical therapy; Internal medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.3108499366026114,"score_gpt":0.5288937105166406,"score_spread":0.21804377391402918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017705528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870912,0.004019636,0.000553827,0.0013616679,0.00034747223,0.00004944903,0.0019606187,0.000041382697,0.0045746644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953489,0.0011373425,0.00031670392,0.000079517624,0.0005851122,0.000022907103,0.0007561876,0.000015581667,0.0017378454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987037,0.0020330255,0.0035465504,0.000723002,0.0029761146,0.0008509071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8013263,0.09500621,0.06515362,0.008665955,0.0146496175,0.01519838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054648854,0.00033085473,0.0007818368,0.014385148,0.0014786947,0.003842615,0.0011577003,0.001435513,0.013637059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09538045,0.00026421342,0.0012127253,0.019489424,0.00084093906,0.0030768672,0.0023896247,0.0015199091,0.00138207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018336736,0.00010903215,0.9912923,0.0001115518,0.00014974903,0.00020436355,0.00020828558,0.000034158766,0.00015940503,0.00015076112,0.0006225997,0.0067743263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019807856,0.00010074995,0.99355465,0.00007339318,0.00015305865,0.0018109292,0.0015881279,0.00030455607,0.00014487322,0.0006105921,0.001623726,0.000015451375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012053405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013468189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006129511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012858693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0456205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017899036","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008","title":"Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":563,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Double blind; Representation (politics); Ecology; Identity (music); Behavioral ecology; Psychology; Sociology; Biology; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law; Pathology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.5917575747767884,"score_gpt":0.6109837434372497,"score_spread":0.01922616866046134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017899036","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13378957,0.4315239,0.057078574,0.13031022,0.1063307,0.039643902,0.031462885,0.0030445086,0.066815674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72112983,0.071768135,0.05846047,0.057692815,0.026695395,0.029204264,0.006883313,0.0014511681,0.026714597],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6893857,0.12329427,0.11496641,0.021185838,0.046081997,0.005085805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27471343,0.43043834,0.11972958,0.058436878,0.10844624,0.00823561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27109882,0.0025533997,0.00872618,0.020355143,0.003674523,0.0083651915,0.003288605,0.011917206,0.027342062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55295324,0.0018815715,0.008581038,0.011570784,0.005611465,0.007033875,0.0052608447,0.0030146714,0.007031441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08656088,0.0007380287,0.044252425,0.34664178,0.056954455,0.001684813,0.0036910288,0.00037548112,0.02234419,0.0052084676,0.09108817,0.34046027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.057335585,0.0043162024,0.17799109,0.09222483,0.17204998,0.004232361,0.002496375,0.0020696435,0.029723253,0.02888267,0.42752486,0.0011532127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012598442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033377986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97964483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003814737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086899195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8988649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018405970","doi":"10.7202/1008150ar","title":"Famili@ et la recherche sur la famille au Québec (1981-2005)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.7135625326729512,"score_gpt":0.6031056219254692,"score_spread":0.11045691074748198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018405970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45008236,0.09129146,0.0042036967,0.021536596,0.0009191656,0.0005459378,0.16365036,0.00053624663,0.26723412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8013144,0.028864294,0.0051176897,0.0022675742,0.00019485618,0.0005266137,0.029539516,0.00014400388,0.13203108],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978108,0.00027650193,0.00015591951,0.00030513934,0.001073127,0.00037847797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98439664,0.0025285443,0.0012029756,0.0005463304,0.010298059,0.0010274377],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035756393,0.0003475848,0.0005682243,0.009247196,0.0046397643,0.004091391,0.00069179235,0.0005925645,0.017226867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012169161,0.00025104242,0.00045239952,0.018240198,0.00107172,0.0015331104,0.0010302126,0.00088179397,0.0015009887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003193851,0.00008102225,0.30932596,0.0025346733,0.0003804772,0.00073018746,0.046829656,0.00071495585,0.0017511758,0.019712867,0.1758739,0.4417456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011332854,0.000026739159,0.6819482,0.00094674056,0.00007653913,0.00014154892,0.01042544,0.00019506889,0.0007359103,0.00033493878,0.3050964,0.000061189385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05803327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060438372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42106283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018606774","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x","title":"Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Medical education; Family medicine; Medicine; Psychology; Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.3774473548546129,"score_gpt":0.648830954288741,"score_spread":0.27138359943412815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018606774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89768964,0.01657926,0.013379923,0.04449343,0.0024614008,0.0016621025,0.00014415912,0.00035033654,0.02323983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97888213,0.004144823,0.010603109,0.0026676496,0.0010091459,0.00040351457,0.00006629203,0.000085905915,0.0021374521],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6909426,0.21380378,0.026933499,0.004605673,0.060015116,0.0036993537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2828653,0.42323726,0.117202744,0.013450358,0.12808402,0.035160378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15476051,0.00052568427,0.0007232874,0.002447203,0.0055428897,0.010848479,0.0019298291,0.0029176734,0.0027419743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.546199,0.0007438173,0.0011691639,0.0015925522,0.0036961455,0.0046616895,0.004020887,0.0030635113,0.0010051928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023693128,0.0008794564,0.19177458,0.0060734744,0.0008011487,0.0038984132,0.50993687,0.0013670055,0.0075791543,0.0030807783,0.028618868,0.24362098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008369385,0.007858233,0.29224768,0.0071206973,0.00063337595,0.013799116,0.4784734,0.0046146032,0.003923238,0.007257007,0.18184163,0.0013940579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031653864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004003475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041625504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014109739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8184616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019123976","doi":"10.3138/w706-5884-kg84-j282","title":"The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4140064352683033,"score_gpt":0.5204434567997827,"score_spread":0.10643702153147938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019123976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31163326,0.025572004,0.04792641,0.41669166,0.09475591,0.002517706,0.0005103871,0.0033752052,0.097017445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7823686,0.009151325,0.05702659,0.06022904,0.033008724,0.0011702385,0.00067009946,0.0015418961,0.05483341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7704151,0.116403066,0.029549956,0.008154396,0.06959245,0.0058851233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23822618,0.41462776,0.09081426,0.06340501,0.16545747,0.02746928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19009878,0.0009973899,0.0017356342,0.006328232,0.0064737955,0.020693695,0.007170986,0.011139428,0.011912267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7102881,0.000825567,0.0020272213,0.0048552305,0.0034998877,0.011567954,0.004949789,0.010914221,0.008765141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002419866,0.0007938159,0.047286633,0.0025226718,0.0005602113,0.0074307765,0.015939858,0.0012213895,0.007295939,0.028294737,0.13485302,0.75138104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083730795,0.004271478,0.15258539,0.005335123,0.001021084,0.028952008,0.045018066,0.006692663,0.014459216,0.09122152,0.6481768,0.0014293953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018105756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002539114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004654377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010392506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019360149","doi":"10.7202/055823ar","title":"Spécificités nationales de la science et de la technologie : une étude de deux universités montréalaises","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.45198800039292275,"score_gpt":0.5650182920949225,"score_spread":0.11303029170199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019360149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97899777,0.002820372,0.00049728627,0.001318233,0.00003544768,0.00012476144,0.0018954099,0.00003639657,0.014274309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871617,0.0016877459,0.00059973006,0.00027506772,0.000020768854,0.00013619672,0.0006157322,0.00001967395,0.00948336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516356,0.0005928662,0.00030263208,0.0007047124,0.0019911479,0.0012450456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901219,0.0027888035,0.0017286277,0.0004798077,0.0030164483,0.0018644155],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003413045,0.0005057308,0.00085725234,0.0077030426,0.00748713,0.0053874287,0.0010228612,0.0007842201,0.00824121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010689778,0.0004834037,0.0008163101,0.014145875,0.0023134965,0.002097049,0.004370533,0.0012541709,0.0004200205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017025211,0.00023464048,0.8391392,0.0006291959,0.00025015298,0.0006902237,0.07508487,0.0007228307,0.0026300563,0.009479826,0.0030947994,0.06787392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010122338,0.00006911843,0.9400924,0.00012664218,0.00007240083,0.00014978426,0.033065423,0.0002234993,0.00071756163,0.0002687253,0.025147619,0.000056591987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8947968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93835694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03067663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024791744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2225756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020164772","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0047-7","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Chinese academy of sciences; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Public relations; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020164772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8320903,0.017252592,0.00665206,0.011857239,0.0004544553,0.00015473842,0.00095696986,0.00021238565,0.13036922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200284,0.0018173989,0.0006966593,0.00029705904,0.00020230023,0.00006291809,0.00013691907,0.00001632789,0.0047676084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423665,0.0015950515,0.00037879078,0.0006489038,0.0018515923,0.0012891069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97587425,0.00917558,0.004483076,0.00084255514,0.0038913658,0.0057332194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785091,0.00040793928,0.0008314106,0.012319948,0.0035123075,0.009088034,0.0013617851,0.0010740167,0.012329171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018145453,0.00028873413,0.0005873218,0.020737953,0.0061552487,0.010158154,0.0057086106,0.0014306784,0.0006496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007379841,0.00023239978,0.2673788,0.00088722125,0.00019257636,0.0006959309,0.008760228,0.0017294656,0.0022332857,0.55169535,0.010359764,0.15509693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025558998,0.00036755324,0.7571536,0.00047476054,0.0008620266,0.0004988092,0.023924246,0.008600395,0.0025998263,0.12943397,0.07564083,0.00018841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019974971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02247934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01557537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06867039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021082438","doi":"10.1002/asi.10278","title":"A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Monash University; Northwestern University; York University; Durham University; University of Colorado Boulder; University of St Andrews; McGill University; University of Reading; University of Oxford; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; University of Notre Dame; University of Southern California; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; University College London; Carnegie Mellon University; Ames Research Center; Macquarie University; Harvard University; Virginia Commonwealth University; Tulane University; University of Pennsylvania; Ohio State University; King's College London; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; University of California, San Diego; University of Toronto; Yale University; San Francisco State University; Princeton University","keywords":"Scholarship; Period (music); Element (criminal law); Sociology; Work (physics); Social science; Library science; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.17184264978978758,"score_gpt":0.499516243637624,"score_spread":0.3276735938478364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021082438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932628,0.0007571661,0.0003945829,0.00024957693,0.000016548789,0.000006506863,0.000079614765,0.0000063615835,0.0052267737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994099,0.00012187215,0.00014824577,0.000009897479,0.000019648376,0.0000039779234,0.000036244615,0.000001989048,0.00024818187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516463,0.0020761092,0.00044850295,0.0004505472,0.0014029953,0.0004572143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224048,0.034200817,0.025086941,0.004692108,0.00926582,0.0043494343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076256436,0.00014469188,0.00037976413,0.011199196,0.0028010535,0.003988054,0.0006059454,0.0003912318,0.0020457415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052611146,0.00018646047,0.00015224323,0.010808426,0.0029094478,0.003422561,0.004994039,0.0006009045,0.00020107222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023346813,0.00006107452,0.8218985,0.00013264014,0.0000633097,0.00035145335,0.09328736,0.00029804042,0.0011328722,0.013070524,0.000979147,0.06849148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100531915,0.00008760354,0.92126995,0.000107025,0.000035161942,0.00054484536,0.05922992,0.0009355604,0.000555074,0.007524328,0.009668969,0.0000314273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002719816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100880675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99237436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013867273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016437616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04032874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021241067","doi":"10.1111/jan.12573","title":"‘But how many papers <i>should</i> I write…?’: making good choices about quality, quantity and visibility of academic publications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quality (philosophy); Visibility; Work (physics); Humanity; Sociology; The arts; Public relations; Computer science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.400975593232495,"score_gpt":0.6046051703475487,"score_spread":0.2036295771150537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021241067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011409998,0.022438092,0.006622814,0.9073296,0.008984751,0.000056789733,0.0001724341,0.00036623623,0.04261922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5151233,0.035068557,0.044912636,0.34284,0.028042292,0.00036978378,0.00043726197,0.0026579148,0.030548245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86403495,0.08891572,0.010050939,0.008250168,0.025621433,0.0031268192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60656226,0.22772238,0.043573275,0.018152615,0.06087496,0.043114524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10453864,0.0006388619,0.0011653495,0.0032278802,0.011723616,0.04514078,0.0030836205,0.007297522,0.00956163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4035194,0.0012680321,0.0008506905,0.005139833,0.021259027,0.047093697,0.007295339,0.012256483,0.00969678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000214603,0.00008920689,0.011357523,0.0011755546,0.0002306665,0.00068021606,0.059580177,0.00026464372,0.0013596014,0.05751297,0.6624599,0.20507494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080877755,0.000121815036,0.009733022,0.002642357,0.0000931089,0.0014411481,0.03732054,0.000275836,0.0011437512,0.096986115,0.84976083,0.0004005899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002825508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047983946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006162076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009792097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5528598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021483469","doi":"10.1007/s00168-011-0477-x","title":"Documenting regional science exceptionalism: what’s special about WRSA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Regional Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Friendship; Association (psychology); Collegiality; Narrative; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8516588281595016,"score_gpt":0.6086905303446607,"score_spread":0.24296829781484086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021483469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19262594,0.038576502,0.017178033,0.6234985,0.010282339,0.00010669877,0.0007272031,0.00051648763,0.116488345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464308,0.012391244,0.0109736575,0.01920488,0.0073171537,0.00007605843,0.00052910385,0.00021625515,0.002860865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97883123,0.011310534,0.001904033,0.0018305843,0.004047143,0.0020764137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8615204,0.057940762,0.022836553,0.01992625,0.026418632,0.011357323],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039129283,0.0003914306,0.0011652191,0.007982027,0.0035102088,0.017081523,0.0023094963,0.0028944171,0.0048205354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15223086,0.00031150432,0.0007114632,0.011027988,0.010368514,0.025608953,0.008470654,0.0047915205,0.0008370233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016743448,0.00020063666,0.124604195,0.0028916695,0.00053941045,0.0006649685,0.027718334,0.0009831535,0.0007754258,0.18619795,0.08716614,0.5680907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037990874,0.00017733646,0.11935772,0.005301711,0.00035327618,0.0014812156,0.12035771,0.0024533458,0.0016424437,0.35196155,0.3966887,0.00018697837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077674864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01464792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036475756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01003377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20693791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022393735","doi":"10.1007/s10916-005-9002-z","title":"Leading Knowledge Producers Within the Biomedical Informatics Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Health informatics; Informatics; Data science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Public health","score_opus":0.47572846670763463,"score_gpt":0.556831645855911,"score_spread":0.08110317914827642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022393735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56939673,0.019007865,0.029209364,0.10068954,0.00167218,0.0005655976,0.002255211,0.000966057,0.2762375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365616,0.0065651606,0.0067224544,0.003835069,0.0012249552,0.00017209399,0.0012428745,0.00016880209,0.043506965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98601866,0.004341491,0.00069338555,0.0019077616,0.00536292,0.001675815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90807265,0.039876033,0.006843217,0.004006709,0.02321803,0.01798343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014556563,0.00046093683,0.0009844215,0.00973856,0.0075108046,0.020424956,0.0015092001,0.003304374,0.024789328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058342528,0.00067083334,0.00052364764,0.012465785,0.0022595925,0.010405966,0.005525441,0.0028239633,0.0061250567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010015467,0.00081881887,0.23012275,0.0013101051,0.00031255296,0.0028255812,0.033450115,0.0015724112,0.0063570454,0.17479725,0.099804975,0.44762677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004377456,0.0003787614,0.12958834,0.0018980342,0.0006798584,0.0021915007,0.059039004,0.008743423,0.010119308,0.12788333,0.65883434,0.00020631525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004029151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063479026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99026144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052495305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013548946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0829286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024560113","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2013.847604","title":"It takes two to tango: knowledge mobilization and ignorance mobilization in science research and innovation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Mobilization; Relevance (law); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Conceptualization; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.6964362196885693,"score_gpt":0.6499707354633399,"score_spread":0.046465484225229337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024560113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16794422,0.034850203,0.21562599,0.20537159,0.0021237237,0.0006928687,0.0005596809,0.0003341072,0.3724976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95440173,0.0071225855,0.02407186,0.0060056313,0.0010025033,0.00084402383,0.00013602908,0.00009052826,0.0063251485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97079784,0.01944974,0.0013533582,0.0017810913,0.0055062696,0.001111778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307586,0.0540437,0.006075565,0.0052235764,0.0025160047,0.0013825416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027941123,0.00078537513,0.0015041162,0.013427736,0.0055096997,0.018431632,0.0014300641,0.0045308527,0.007508449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06844735,0.00063860655,0.0010794259,0.017254474,0.045717116,0.043144923,0.01610814,0.0048603504,0.00067035656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004141719,0.000037252426,0.0021290192,0.00044588614,0.000029001596,0.000117296964,0.016722558,0.0005180518,0.00010622577,0.94903064,0.0015285341,0.029294137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013095118,0.000025673888,0.0013894979,0.0004113334,0.000016658018,0.00008744023,0.007526872,0.000668957,0.00011588236,0.9689023,0.020817395,0.000024929259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019356644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012890022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069840476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006822953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14776856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027653211","doi":"10.1087/0953151042321644","title":"The International Consortium for the Advancement of Academic Publication — an idea whose time has come (finally!)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Mainstream; Political science; Politics; Scholarly communication; Process (computing); Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Publishing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5407789765104187,"score_gpt":0.5441237570364209,"score_spread":0.003344780526002178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027653211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017204804,0.063339464,0.00958951,0.5927182,0.09714585,0.00020992427,0.00041392425,0.0005812836,0.23428139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12338475,0.14994374,0.07760175,0.1377995,0.05205564,0.0016905162,0.0021710934,0.0011721813,0.45418087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574186,0.011251342,0.0021658437,0.0016988671,0.024197647,0.0032677918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94563615,0.0060032774,0.003309389,0.005707803,0.025918324,0.013424993],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040794186,0.0010160442,0.0009864926,0.0056281006,0.006033056,0.04671591,0.002333548,0.008044991,0.017558046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040732175,0.00039529227,0.00071910594,0.010254074,0.013948927,0.018566782,0.008306601,0.012080628,0.011066842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032634263,0.00003873353,0.00047158892,0.00025275315,0.000011488088,0.000037578437,0.0003954831,0.00008107341,0.000226912,0.45186427,0.39796358,0.14862384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009794823,0.000015854355,0.00032948726,0.0002953892,0.000006033374,0.00004442899,0.0003712245,0.000068935864,0.00011398742,0.027122373,0.9716058,0.000016658903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013682656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008893655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010124675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21574283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027992795","doi":"10.2196/jmir.2177","title":"Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Informatics; Health informatics; Computer science; Index (typography); Multidisciplinary approach; Metric (unit); Scopus; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Business informatics; Percentile; Construct (python library); Data science; MEDLINE; Data mining; World Wide Web; Health care; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.7879302847482185,"score_gpt":0.7013157810152683,"score_spread":0.08661450373295021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027992795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8531596,0.0030691312,0.08307291,0.001440552,0.00056734245,0.001585072,0.016989995,0.0014971509,0.03861824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353351,0.00029877303,0.051396962,0.00013957491,0.00023103443,0.0011383247,0.010358143,0.0001265192,0.00097561366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9483396,0.015584872,0.008057753,0.0028957606,0.02339745,0.0017246661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7587699,0.1425583,0.035750523,0.016055534,0.041716125,0.0051496183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04340919,0.0010684651,0.0014043641,0.028594691,0.0015117215,0.003979143,0.0017474454,0.001763652,0.0023103028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18032241,0.00027060942,0.0017833752,0.024090374,0.001857601,0.004165107,0.0032685178,0.0012452963,0.0010221861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001899026,0.0009897295,0.8010922,0.0009094437,0.0016013631,0.00022324231,0.0017238848,0.01978392,0.0025648712,0.012960341,0.017482307,0.13876972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036656827,0.0037384701,0.8888128,0.00031728923,0.00036889865,0.00055714865,0.0026119556,0.058703355,0.009467874,0.020399207,0.01435426,0.00030214048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023434756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003249869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002887687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22957247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028083052","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1418218112","title":"Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":329,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Popularity; Elite; Institution; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Public relations; Work (physics); Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5052656839917774,"score_gpt":0.5108839846730919,"score_spread":0.005618300681314525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028083052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93262774,0.009449764,0.018446561,0.0037852896,0.0005131502,0.00083469425,0.0029481498,0.00055324164,0.030841317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853258,0.0011112423,0.010067771,0.0003717582,0.00036057457,0.00028320024,0.0017262924,0.00009564066,0.0006576036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7633187,0.11299398,0.034767177,0.017190393,0.06748664,0.004243054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1625016,0.63555616,0.11584639,0.036752667,0.042436156,0.0069069667],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17398496,0.00085171737,0.0015178741,0.012204717,0.002190121,0.00943199,0.0022892568,0.0018395626,0.0022324454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58404195,0.00046474682,0.0012008483,0.012860169,0.004530846,0.008679784,0.0054087956,0.0018702005,0.0011590348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010314507,0.00038457772,0.8021847,0.0028994589,0.0018875346,0.00016297017,0.007556553,0.0037209077,0.0015438076,0.0053662634,0.006428171,0.1668337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002317822,0.0018116379,0.9237377,0.0014179031,0.0012617683,0.00046437347,0.005625128,0.00959253,0.005271094,0.016468234,0.03383155,0.00028620297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016356129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017031034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027296531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004455986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9201314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028653974","doi":"","title":"Problematising the Construction of Journal Quality: An Engagement with the Mainstream","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Journal ranking; Construct (python library); Citation; Privilege (computing); Proxy (statistics); Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Politics; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Law","score_opus":0.4298522153998736,"score_gpt":0.5091114348103812,"score_spread":0.07925921941050762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028653974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13625945,0.025962105,0.39835376,0.38312823,0.002157695,0.0005242974,0.00017781879,0.0002878274,0.053148836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87657154,0.0057216273,0.106540866,0.0058877976,0.0028903058,0.000454537,0.00006497206,0.00027592576,0.0015924261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.78234506,0.13718964,0.016288552,0.013074925,0.047496792,0.0036050917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50453824,0.3944818,0.02885722,0.02056752,0.046585787,0.004969392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19099621,0.0012247348,0.0035807772,0.028072651,0.010376727,0.0525301,0.0066171605,0.007782859,0.001983318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31515247,0.0012850503,0.0012547409,0.022877079,0.10509375,0.044049073,0.018742124,0.010376879,0.0003461211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006714531,0.00010138736,0.015473205,0.001445716,0.00015891346,0.00023558435,0.06796327,0.001119034,0.00070324313,0.836046,0.0034212018,0.073265366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032843338,0.00008604279,0.006734227,0.0008837479,0.000049733106,0.00029001883,0.037356008,0.0053742654,0.0005061643,0.9221244,0.026453182,0.000109471854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006176618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004836226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97192734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018567858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016243001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028838114","doi":"10.3138/jvme.38.1.33","title":"Open Access of Publications by Veterinary Faculty in the United States and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); MEDLINE; Free access; Veterinary medicine; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.835368762935936,"score_gpt":0.6633882952517739,"score_spread":0.17198046768416209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028838114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46894372,0.10189428,0.00065486884,0.010369751,0.00086329,0.00037703235,0.25435224,0.00056427764,0.16198052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165463,0.078708336,0.0022989816,0.0013458136,0.0003931412,0.00019456574,0.05826785,0.00016562277,0.042079315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904619,0.0005780415,0.0010551099,0.0006476138,0.0058929394,0.0013644089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93080074,0.011168659,0.011681848,0.0013221328,0.03484805,0.010178562],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034107103,0.00048813855,0.0007233195,0.04526078,0.004159405,0.006666664,0.001433453,0.0005197414,0.011728285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034991868,0.00028976638,0.00069668033,0.09454052,0.0016099841,0.0014919491,0.002035527,0.00051099405,0.0015724329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078620156,0.00011619732,0.52492356,0.0057472307,0.0005073485,0.0017641151,0.008339581,0.00049400865,0.0013844275,0.009336298,0.12518206,0.32141894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003694775,0.00005478519,0.8360663,0.001291363,0.0001419772,0.0008284432,0.005343121,0.00034894276,0.00056903594,0.00086377014,0.15437572,0.000079488185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9355965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95264924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99856657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0304476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09460256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22091383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030183246","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0006547","title":"The Impact of Boundary Spanning Scholarly Publications and Patents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Natural science; Data science; Scholarship; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7275158009252825,"score_gpt":0.5551312487887239,"score_spread":0.17238455213655857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030183246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822856,0.0027545225,0.0006902754,0.0016358596,0.00006397365,0.000021329566,0.0017399342,0.000045062374,0.010763472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973763,0.00072340074,0.00018560156,0.00004461401,0.00016793325,0.000008659913,0.0010364471,0.000007816725,0.00044930063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928599,0.0017276878,0.0008670905,0.0008013519,0.003081539,0.0006623277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68273425,0.21791877,0.070545696,0.0057651536,0.0145099675,0.008526205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067764525,0.00034903426,0.0006478831,0.016002005,0.0010878878,0.0053809937,0.00074563595,0.0012646947,0.0071214284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13755906,0.00012768988,0.00044802084,0.021943813,0.0014025237,0.00531465,0.002659483,0.0012245779,0.000934963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039443513,0.00029533377,0.9113034,0.00041681656,0.00041775795,0.0005203635,0.0010388927,0.00457906,0.0010650349,0.006879508,0.0030367419,0.07005266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004913965,0.0002449741,0.9659443,0.00022907951,0.00037167,0.00075286545,0.0019105839,0.0067496854,0.0023289856,0.014470369,0.0068882513,0.000060149072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019404755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001283515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99322355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015122182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011466487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03583771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030245717","doi":"10.1186/1465-9921-10-35","title":"Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Respiratory Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Christie (Canada); McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Impact factor; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Presentation (obstetrics); Data science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Linguistics; History; Epistemology; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.7202358461148053,"score_gpt":0.64610634913581,"score_spread":0.07412949697899529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030245717","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015925364,0.0055726464,0.00020718442,0.15010394,0.8431017,0.000024213616,0.0000510858,0.000030423873,0.0007495669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001990584,0.0053129997,0.0003020515,0.06235875,0.9267337,0.00003092028,0.000021507565,0.000039084138,0.0032103334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209666,0.002125375,0.0012125011,0.00090313406,0.0033645097,0.0002979003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934948,0.04034452,0.0028704852,0.0010483499,0.01768776,0.0031008439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014655561,0.0022215862,0.0029892542,0.002917242,0.0038350897,0.0075066187,0.004749992,0.021152236,0.0036532711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07092833,0.00089099427,0.0017824856,0.0022068836,0.005229137,0.0039045953,0.0013944249,0.022211738,0.0029611827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007146135,0.000018636812,0.00011584144,0.00050572545,0.000038667447,0.00033992942,0.000097660624,0.000048962065,0.0001399076,0.0008478347,0.9910024,0.0067728264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011722371,0.00006713403,0.0011302489,0.0016529278,0.00015755997,0.00083880936,0.00038300184,0.0007489071,0.00058811187,0.004839855,0.98942155,0.000054561053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033344275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065551633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99708277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047823456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038379978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07750696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032093065","doi":"10.1186/1471-5945-14-1","title":"Comparison of publication trends in dermatology among Japan, South Korea and Mainland China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SKiN Health","funders":"National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"China; Mainland China; Dermatology; Mainland; Geography; Medicine; Traditional medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.33046668067298457,"score_gpt":0.5180831048279414,"score_spread":0.18761642415495683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032093065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92542076,0.05603063,0.0003739624,0.0008763958,0.00016597076,0.00008256238,0.0121007,0.00010645696,0.004842651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96518964,0.022850446,0.00095989334,0.0002537935,0.00027202733,0.00014274046,0.008821811,0.00004877572,0.0014608958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633175,0.00039043167,0.0014345306,0.0006498465,0.0008360922,0.00035743762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665855,0.007920816,0.013852036,0.0011853569,0.008031594,0.0024247172],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003906593,0.0005311782,0.00080863055,0.023293497,0.0005477016,0.002472194,0.0005620597,0.0003708399,0.0022913564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012623997,0.0002444588,0.0013784604,0.028401498,0.0004963188,0.0019352481,0.00093805796,0.00029955205,0.00047881776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030752286,0.000026236945,0.9680636,0.0015865446,0.0008608915,0.0005288356,0.0008901135,0.00008969155,0.0008973908,0.00017557571,0.0014261687,0.025147513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013641238,0.000053387546,0.9945281,0.00020583037,0.00037783876,0.00058098853,0.00082064053,0.000112094516,0.00025977122,0.00006560076,0.002968557,0.000013555388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004649219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009643251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010256154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020660281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032612522","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.100524","title":"Growing Trend of China’s Contribution to the Field of Rheumatology 2000–2009: A Survey of Chinese Rheumatology Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Rheumatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Rheumatology; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; China; Mainland China; Family medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.224564627582642,"score_gpt":0.5322449953018727,"score_spread":0.30768036771923074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032612522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8715155,0.107016355,0.0002722604,0.0072025717,0.00030088075,0.00006414003,0.0054445383,0.00008594163,0.008097865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376299,0.05398099,0.0006227748,0.0011214876,0.00070871675,0.00006079608,0.0033995216,0.000014952566,0.0024608388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978678,0.0002840953,0.00056816376,0.00028886512,0.0008180161,0.00017303509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827979,0.0035350735,0.006673347,0.00039803574,0.004394568,0.0022009185],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031807385,0.0003772216,0.0005519931,0.013216924,0.0005357195,0.0012676832,0.0006654854,0.0006164843,0.0032603582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074487887,0.0001878302,0.00066764816,0.018499324,0.0006556457,0.0015945807,0.0008841294,0.0003059667,0.0004370704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001629777,0.000044108114,0.90579975,0.0038698248,0.00056211173,0.0012716099,0.0020368483,0.00022865091,0.0031289686,0.00085271284,0.0075548696,0.07448755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011471416,0.000058928308,0.98798984,0.00023236287,0.00010680301,0.00063062506,0.00052250695,0.00014039807,0.00023124319,0.00006115344,0.010003205,0.000011432295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012466478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014596742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019661533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004121858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024787843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033691041","doi":"","title":"The Skewed Few: Does 'Skew' Signal Quality Among Journals, Articles, and Academics?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Skepticism; Publication; Elite; Quality (philosophy); Skew; Political science; Psychology; Accounting; Business; Law; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Telecommunications; Epistemology","score_opus":0.392888126573138,"score_gpt":0.5416786107788136,"score_spread":0.14879048420567564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033691041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82702947,0.009377,0.03982797,0.08270716,0.0022243913,0.00017336922,0.00199094,0.000302452,0.036367226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860838,0.0011065203,0.0033143987,0.007064367,0.0011541329,0.00005027501,0.00023471011,0.00006768127,0.0009241793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760227,0.013574596,0.0020098882,0.0023706835,0.0051706075,0.00085144246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7021981,0.15802024,0.07967512,0.026765028,0.023878565,0.009462962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03378974,0.00042658465,0.0019795217,0.006574805,0.0016295222,0.0066366787,0.0017379416,0.0024760822,0.0029030475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25222662,0.00044712168,0.0005567189,0.010158868,0.011038706,0.01154141,0.004375356,0.0028507132,0.001247921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079709943,0.00012049296,0.85084057,0.0005572309,0.00038053698,0.0002898387,0.0058409716,0.0005411875,0.00072240847,0.02541335,0.0106723625,0.10382397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013019932,0.0006606653,0.69436735,0.000861697,0.00037671276,0.0015970857,0.01662997,0.0051802457,0.0021854143,0.24731696,0.030433113,0.0002605837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033751477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038361952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018040318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014070416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17869937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034610514","doi":"10.1108/19355181201000007","title":"Twenty‐Five Years of the (Mid‐)American Journal of Business","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Business","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Intersection (aeronautics); Management; Library science; Political science; History; Economics; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1665839371864026,"score_gpt":0.46683930446660493,"score_spread":0.3002553672802023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034610514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04087923,0.15034334,0.0035038826,0.17806771,0.23750831,0.00037633374,0.008195564,0.00083248597,0.38029322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19731224,0.1383585,0.0050938036,0.030977398,0.11666474,0.0003579358,0.008412109,0.0007400951,0.5020833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631184,0.000310358,0.00030322955,0.00032657397,0.0024431425,0.00030488154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98583895,0.0012870993,0.0016817561,0.0008849901,0.0064666853,0.0038405848],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034284405,0.0005588625,0.00070084835,0.007568389,0.0035572455,0.014587286,0.0006693508,0.0018500201,0.027243154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016999168,0.00026009989,0.00032626247,0.0085753,0.002541175,0.004961395,0.003219975,0.002210367,0.01749616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008219533,0.00011956339,0.00795819,0.0003910303,0.00002425434,0.00013368875,0.000788729,0.000040177023,0.0008012907,0.015132438,0.852144,0.122384526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032213081,0.00002172349,0.010283453,0.00019304814,0.000006064697,0.000118789096,0.00040897515,0.000028090306,0.00014461023,0.0014829072,0.9872978,0.000011203631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014099275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054246658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99243164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021794278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005914909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09113747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035232183","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.013","title":"Bibliometrics of the Top 100 Clinical Articles in Digestive Disease","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gastroenterology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Disease; Medicine; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.49356636163877593,"score_gpt":0.5581707705082158,"score_spread":0.06460440886943991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035232183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72760826,0.113336354,0.0026042687,0.0052679894,0.0017446547,0.00030997145,0.11334068,0.0008498342,0.034937978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288752,0.026434062,0.0024031582,0.00026482015,0.0019427887,0.0001945785,0.03761833,0.000093388735,0.0021737034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98050815,0.0038084122,0.005171267,0.0011512919,0.008561723,0.0007991831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93517673,0.035092704,0.010978742,0.0025901368,0.013938463,0.0022232302],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00798356,0.0009153482,0.0026920612,0.12301872,0.0016184826,0.005343907,0.00084236584,0.001093644,0.0053003407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07520916,0.00033143375,0.0029216018,0.122395165,0.0009184535,0.0021805407,0.0021620926,0.00086950493,0.0019276335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017658966,0.00041696307,0.69329894,0.012495623,0.006974226,0.00087067025,0.001118726,0.002017224,0.003979908,0.0028277552,0.039738227,0.2344958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015822436,0.00032854523,0.9432651,0.0011799366,0.003449298,0.0026631851,0.0011777449,0.002529606,0.0023047882,0.0033633676,0.039491504,0.00008873009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028423797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041990923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87698126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020208075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004282139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042221606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035300043","doi":"10.1332/174426410x483024","title":"Developing a guide to support the knowledge translation component of the grant application process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Plan (archaeology); Knowledge translation; Process management; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.6723618178160189,"score_gpt":0.6395747351570958,"score_spread":0.03278708265892305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035300043","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067063747,0.0019563762,0.79075336,0.08310154,0.004392022,0.031031257,0.0023730856,0.018925725,0.060760178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00470963,0.0011633856,0.965709,0.004063346,0.0003614916,0.009158681,0.0007298912,0.00062982395,0.01347481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9212576,0.049575843,0.011493984,0.0019931467,0.013530171,0.0021492345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7120505,0.15667698,0.01721209,0.017575989,0.08082744,0.015657067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1214203,0.002226998,0.002272053,0.013638991,0.005190737,0.011503078,0.006210603,0.011602801,0.01742721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17078657,0.003395754,0.0017332392,0.008828058,0.005091925,0.012895987,0.009314949,0.012452895,0.0389765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013337433,0.0011884213,0.0015407575,0.0013399604,0.00004989284,0.0020356558,0.016282264,0.0036427132,0.0035982507,0.040748138,0.5135002,0.4159404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016342878,0.00028581696,0.0012706387,0.0013477142,0.000017610864,0.0010138887,0.005570286,0.0037131715,0.0013540862,0.039671816,0.94533044,0.00026118336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066002337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014563194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008635005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046947535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6421396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035396258","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0085382","title":"With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: the Importance of Rejection, Power, and Editors in the Practice of Scientific Publishing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Proxy (statistics); Data science; Peer review; Scientific literature; Library science; Biology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2868372913769961,"score_gpt":0.4410933058599852,"score_spread":0.1542560144829891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035396258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6722476,0.01579529,0.094829015,0.13558869,0.003896299,0.0009025651,0.00031681263,0.00056303554,0.07586072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833182,0.0009989368,0.008661967,0.003008867,0.001983754,0.00024225481,0.000045313947,0.000136868,0.0016038057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.4129878,0.38865104,0.047093824,0.023857024,0.12030894,0.0071014026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.053765424,0.76380473,0.11038888,0.03290532,0.028722327,0.010413233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40886524,0.0006815286,0.0024130794,0.010845752,0.006274928,0.024594905,0.003899634,0.004529457,0.0039120317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.84408134,0.0011352402,0.00097145024,0.012087931,0.022679536,0.020300968,0.012444648,0.0058948398,0.0009819556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016849245,0.00055234873,0.4397571,0.0024577235,0.001179304,0.0010272863,0.08184351,0.0015112944,0.0017697338,0.053306054,0.01356499,0.40134567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079914776,0.0023725433,0.570893,0.0033570891,0.0008998377,0.003462718,0.05656782,0.012125032,0.0039675413,0.2706959,0.07365446,0.0012049647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001971481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021822222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061988034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011982457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035603363","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0073","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences: Developing a Scientific Power Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Index (typography); Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Science Citation Index; Impact factor; Social science; Citation; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4639904991995301,"score_gpt":0.5221175649609832,"score_spread":0.058127065761453045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035603363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576239,0.003546726,0.01240206,0.0009354381,0.00012706745,0.0001582554,0.003361497,0.00017479593,0.021670306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888604,0.0012883646,0.007409344,0.000022501696,0.00009895206,0.00008565049,0.001374443,0.000019435116,0.0008408651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996808,0.0006059518,0.00057512574,0.0002088788,0.0016323803,0.00016961253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824636,0.0061736335,0.00653808,0.00062736956,0.0034048767,0.000792474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005684904,0.00072359416,0.00065741304,0.025482204,0.00041786535,0.0047027892,0.0006391482,0.0004784874,0.0011275847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0217808,0.000180463,0.00076557574,0.025345119,0.00071468565,0.0049928613,0.0018829232,0.0005697865,0.00052644045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009519829,0.00013775784,0.8393021,0.0004483884,0.00026841607,0.0001386303,0.00092906784,0.0054541556,0.00060497783,0.0032771358,0.001401455,0.14794265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025131252,0.00038974418,0.93132055,0.0003794565,0.00020304054,0.0004597076,0.002818443,0.044936996,0.0027128493,0.0056345775,0.011024831,0.00009482646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026576598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025918114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019653086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027327777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03006494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035928974","doi":"10.1108/00220411011023607","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Originality; Metadata; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.32507304535495857,"score_gpt":0.5600739134317266,"score_spread":0.23500086807676807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035928974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97191274,0.016927937,0.0010565209,0.000859847,0.00013933028,0.00007289236,0.005106695,0.000037363407,0.0038866065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923328,0.0030602429,0.0011551753,0.00010789084,0.00014497808,0.00006288345,0.0026682124,0.00001494126,0.0004528626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720642,0.0061641363,0.005912841,0.0028456193,0.011977802,0.001035388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70842063,0.15293013,0.07627083,0.015590505,0.043027606,0.0037603234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03142889,0.00027438742,0.0012754975,0.030442843,0.0011910825,0.0029220767,0.0011810918,0.0008938007,0.0011469868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1471617,0.00024754845,0.0010499521,0.028363751,0.001403608,0.00252709,0.003097461,0.000687859,0.0003313952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031264854,0.000053676828,0.9372136,0.0008354077,0.00052104297,0.00031819625,0.0022458835,0.00029596005,0.0003280381,0.00058802497,0.0017122427,0.055575304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011642135,0.00008222082,0.99005836,0.00025754469,0.00031575985,0.0012600822,0.001727917,0.0003283715,0.00073994824,0.00067136926,0.004516997,0.000029871304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035399897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026509494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024871211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16621381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036137014","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0039464","title":"Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; James S. McDonnell Foundation; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Web of science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Natural science; Library science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7867820999348057,"score_gpt":0.5178547517630294,"score_spread":0.2689273481717763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036137014","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07095269,0.0012234069,0.53706235,0.014241377,0.013170028,0.02311109,0.13611925,0.04692702,0.1571928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070460126,0.0006891905,0.81642246,0.00081098446,0.00072958507,0.011830368,0.07794377,0.004283481,0.016829958],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789794,0.00442852,0.004558572,0.003830018,0.007991473,0.0012936114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8444076,0.0153071545,0.0059883622,0.01939128,0.11085458,0.004051052],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023907026,0.0012427723,0.0015762481,0.02407758,0.0038167597,0.014067741,0.004088654,0.0014099195,0.021163322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10454498,0.0014130117,0.0016559953,0.03754944,0.0015740658,0.010608062,0.0056667556,0.003237017,0.013731041],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033749494,0.00022308118,0.028167253,0.0015973262,0.00012503807,0.00021555558,0.0053955154,0.004106491,0.0021591696,0.029028118,0.30666676,0.6219782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017425914,0.00018627719,0.02692264,0.0006968255,0.0001929366,0.00014928391,0.004562617,0.0140035115,0.004995609,0.010745183,0.9371075,0.00026323565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049133975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027446771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070980988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020733759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12643391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036361711","doi":"10.1021/ed400518m","title":"“Six Degrees of Separation”—Revealing a “Small-World Phenomenon” through a Chemistry Literature Search Activity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Polymer science; Epistemology; Materials science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3601155835965435,"score_gpt":0.5657124759820694,"score_spread":0.20559689238552592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036361711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68991256,0.0011064031,0.19265658,0.0142963575,0.0008695573,0.0014116543,0.0012264168,0.0027762707,0.09574427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8272933,0.0005416967,0.15067486,0.0012402174,0.00021418338,0.0009495239,0.0006781872,0.0004451025,0.017962929],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944982,0.0030321598,0.00035016832,0.00071134226,0.0011483257,0.00025982657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96080756,0.028865967,0.0031732267,0.003520984,0.0019010558,0.0017311827],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062454245,0.0005950834,0.00046721892,0.0048478176,0.0028010684,0.0048487466,0.0010422013,0.0012456942,0.007951535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032831572,0.0003449719,0.00056847645,0.004944142,0.0027126498,0.00649686,0.00571498,0.0016326879,0.0017737597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013123566,0.0012389297,0.02649031,0.0030441633,0.00012280467,0.0024248736,0.1850429,0.0018021998,0.045120094,0.10912723,0.07397223,0.55030185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003819108,0.0013672969,0.046846878,0.0012404904,0.00018096673,0.005900893,0.091724634,0.022435114,0.043243963,0.20064497,0.58554083,0.0004920327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037080984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011917879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085157494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014813605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033029318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037081747","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0092896","title":"Imbalance in Individual Researcher's Peer Review Activities Quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Universität Zürich; Royal Society","keywords":"Peer review; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.8472890003982537,"score_gpt":0.56560010759442,"score_spread":0.2816888928038337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037081747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238492,0.01841109,0.0023551243,0.0038870042,0.00048593205,0.00059727643,0.033771988,0.00029505652,0.016347365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620453,0.006180338,0.005833012,0.00037066644,0.00032039802,0.00084663485,0.017160706,0.00014968168,0.0070932163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8404,0.03683625,0.051473524,0.009728265,0.057464413,0.004097501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51736283,0.10454082,0.2150624,0.016937718,0.13513401,0.010962173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04660863,0.00054305414,0.0014014957,0.027178956,0.0016126513,0.00445087,0.0016488456,0.0010563788,0.0019436992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22977804,0.0007236859,0.0007300483,0.035104446,0.0014641101,0.003679659,0.0036920966,0.0010030823,0.0011830222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014045247,0.00013281961,0.8396417,0.006216741,0.0009665454,0.0005318802,0.016412314,0.0005602962,0.0028814399,0.0012016848,0.017749278,0.11230083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020943304,0.00011139778,0.96514666,0.00045894587,0.0001735131,0.00051296735,0.003341664,0.00033967744,0.00069428014,0.0003026538,0.028830087,0.00006721539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022705644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051724426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97282106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006365196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00827706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24649292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037110918","doi":"10.17323/1995-459x.2012.3.40.49","title":"Factors Influencing Research Performance in Higher Education: An Empirical Investigation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foresight-Russia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boulevard; Valuation (finance); Library science; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Accounting; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8388138199934497,"score_gpt":0.620716953153231,"score_spread":0.21809686684021867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037110918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960918,0.00038257046,0.00025991478,0.00022923251,0.0000049957134,0.00009127322,0.00039508194,0.000007940758,0.002537178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985538,0.0002639078,0.00039631405,0.000027525275,0.00001210847,0.00003990226,0.00025191868,0.0000035397136,0.00045093856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919661,0.0023868107,0.0008957299,0.0005766995,0.002889288,0.0012853636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84379745,0.10298891,0.0251115,0.003428084,0.017610464,0.00706365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011599718,0.00033232663,0.0005572851,0.006605298,0.0015940124,0.00341487,0.0010121944,0.00077178545,0.0037394806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04209338,0.00021910544,0.0006448541,0.015961638,0.0017839881,0.001874396,0.0014422314,0.0008015392,0.00048842945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039196508,0.00016304411,0.9869098,0.00012953248,0.000041343304,0.00013908991,0.002377194,0.00013479475,0.00009357079,0.00017828442,0.0001828109,0.009611237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002503019,0.00005650916,0.99318284,0.000052675194,0.000020579153,0.00004503941,0.005641676,0.00031615395,0.00007609551,0.000048745125,0.00055071694,0.000006394048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06644484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0635228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057436638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010841789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037914303","doi":"10.1097/maj.0b013e3181f683a1","title":"Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of the Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.49236101212260036,"score_gpt":0.6198712869661325,"score_spread":0.1275102748435321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037914303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9117313,0.0008946088,0.015010804,0.001782175,0.0004202503,0.00050715794,0.0017795919,0.00010981437,0.06776427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137324,0.00016723192,0.006078586,0.00007226624,0.00017193858,0.00025754928,0.000640968,0.000023304645,0.0012149384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96698594,0.012436448,0.004947809,0.0016305799,0.013040173,0.0009590393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7031499,0.20772891,0.024704676,0.008031387,0.050431225,0.0059538577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031225644,0.000611428,0.0008269209,0.016221786,0.0021998293,0.0050871805,0.0014057852,0.0015195719,0.0064692707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2049322,0.00017241696,0.0010604069,0.010253648,0.00276585,0.0065492257,0.0060587307,0.001322574,0.0012873055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026582356,0.0009456644,0.65892166,0.0015129382,0.000692176,0.00078424875,0.02284527,0.0021738897,0.0050106957,0.020936964,0.006639968,0.2768782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036398487,0.0044460557,0.8298065,0.0006789357,0.0008526431,0.0018028589,0.04638666,0.017166028,0.010417359,0.059266586,0.028482886,0.0003294972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019963241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037622324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99848044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011255366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010911828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1651389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038196424","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3","title":"Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bookmarking; Social media; Citation; Tracking (education); Scopus; World Wide Web; Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5482835610101827,"score_gpt":0.547941311386074,"score_spread":0.0003422496241086703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038196424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042169,0.033892892,0.01612323,0.025296343,0.0006891582,0.00016589345,0.005058707,0.00081058306,0.11374634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243964,0.0059226877,0.005323586,0.0009012857,0.0008805195,0.00005190237,0.0024124268,0.00019489216,0.0018731081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9045132,0.033405636,0.008449059,0.008392426,0.042168092,0.0030716714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4140251,0.34176823,0.07502758,0.038901955,0.118974514,0.011302594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08737023,0.0005578734,0.0011121994,0.08448674,0.0028719476,0.021635795,0.0032106782,0.002790762,0.00584476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38355172,0.000582247,0.0013469062,0.071302,0.0036945322,0.0162732,0.009176964,0.0026887716,0.0014200412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046713967,0.0002275907,0.57816684,0.0023833148,0.0009717767,0.0002982883,0.022064136,0.0013630175,0.0028614043,0.040280353,0.010211675,0.34070447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000949555,0.00037882288,0.7870881,0.0053941677,0.0012323633,0.0018187442,0.019676022,0.0125972275,0.0058775637,0.02455189,0.14104697,0.00024315169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067352983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065306774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057509146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066023134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4620635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038336957","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.070506","title":"Peer review or barbecue? The choice is clear","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Commercialization; Rule of thumb; Computer science; Data science; Operations research; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.3064915061976739,"score_gpt":0.5548140024342418,"score_spread":0.24832249623656794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038336957","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004758744,0.0057148486,0.00059836113,0.17388977,0.81706035,0.000030455,0.000038687795,0.0001058859,0.0025141593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001479618,0.0074918093,0.0010796763,0.15746732,0.8170149,0.00006788927,0.00002769956,0.00016202738,0.0152090425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96922565,0.007987476,0.0042262003,0.0038110544,0.0133366855,0.0014129172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87964195,0.05758216,0.006025972,0.005402283,0.041753396,0.009594225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044074528,0.0029883832,0.0049798493,0.003327159,0.0045613674,0.012840891,0.0055970703,0.02219767,0.013097612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16649312,0.0011437088,0.0020226075,0.0027545884,0.012258739,0.011259754,0.002209651,0.033250805,0.020266106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033622004,0.0000111316795,0.00003242463,0.00026461954,0.000021503172,0.00004241195,0.000038947164,0.000021734471,0.000056820663,0.0046824976,0.9856412,0.009153113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008970525,0.000032198528,0.00021692873,0.00065303425,0.00004334943,0.00013457035,0.00014702228,0.00024339715,0.00011109493,0.010649787,0.9876223,0.000056552286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004002241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010645699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95592546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041421484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005338334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23309112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038587805","doi":"10.1007/s10508-009-9582-7","title":"Cruising: Impact Factor Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.7010522361312548,"score_gpt":0.639044386930346,"score_spread":0.06200784920090874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038587805","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001086574,0.004427961,0.0023258876,0.050189577,0.93765974,0.000070264905,0.0015606137,0.00085190654,0.0028054172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002448332,0.0069055283,0.004889858,0.025335986,0.9309867,0.0001994884,0.0019556792,0.001302393,0.025976121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97582656,0.00394403,0.0031526675,0.0016145937,0.014886949,0.0005752618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8217065,0.09499695,0.006159381,0.013414666,0.059543766,0.0041788095],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021905344,0.003789295,0.0052501955,0.01897505,0.0033356387,0.011645551,0.0071999035,0.010388025,0.033922814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19563097,0.0020491164,0.0036233463,0.012044794,0.004669473,0.0075908503,0.003915945,0.020449385,0.02413474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108688155,0.000004523064,0.00003300605,0.00015954435,0.00001984245,0.000030734933,0.000015266696,0.00001886018,0.000038130525,0.00039149253,0.99181056,0.007467261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041060317,0.000008822786,0.0006876254,0.0005794979,0.00006128883,0.000094370436,0.00004499026,0.00026263107,0.00015488968,0.0053286357,0.99269617,0.000040000363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062015126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013655783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032299734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005718715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115847945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039947719","doi":"10.4000/rga.464","title":"Knowledge Transfer Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de géographie alpine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.41680975064642484,"score_gpt":0.49417981873544203,"score_spread":0.0773700680890172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039947719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032819354,0.0027665687,0.06804143,0.009094977,0.0008903287,0.0007351565,0.016719228,0.022808338,0.8756621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08897128,0.011227637,0.08875363,0.00663408,0.0012768214,0.0018586103,0.06124806,0.00891771,0.7311121],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945475,0.0013617991,0.000569686,0.0006351916,0.0021350028,0.00075087085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608935,0.0048744753,0.00079084677,0.0041490276,0.0030020594,0.0010942152],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040818816,0.0014682973,0.0012527622,0.008422545,0.0025660805,0.012791042,0.004778103,0.00587194,0.31727076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027403954,0.0007461943,0.0017647822,0.0125392685,0.0013979005,0.01435309,0.01115415,0.0023265723,0.25384754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002560561,0.00024010587,0.0011486824,0.0015362197,0.00007088817,0.0006539782,0.0012554316,0.0014603949,0.0011542422,0.11745545,0.37438563,0.5003829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004194169,0.00002741401,0.0005050709,0.00035891467,0.000018232831,0.00033952904,0.0005626108,0.0013144827,0.0008536833,0.036167536,0.9597695,0.00004126137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008887197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053337533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99157745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034973244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008606804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9738304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040153632","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2012.09.006","title":"The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: A province-wide study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Context (archaeology); Rank (graph theory); Index (typography); Medicine; Normative; Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Web of science; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Mathematics; Library science; Computer science; Database; Geography; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6384092262250437,"score_gpt":0.5810208108211644,"score_spread":0.05738841540387929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040153632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909031,0.0026084008,0.0006487926,0.000688621,0.000040350795,0.000037980608,0.0014434205,0.000071997034,0.0035573135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984781,0.000370791,0.00028980745,0.000027885864,0.000028358087,0.00000683898,0.0005126947,0.000010574283,0.00027497514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269295,0.002261678,0.000749668,0.00070348405,0.0029658058,0.00062637194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95838976,0.018574102,0.0075435066,0.0034350345,0.009382917,0.0026747228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012082722,0.00055341073,0.001816203,0.009609743,0.0013081309,0.002582632,0.0012671889,0.0007242016,0.0016923202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04314234,0.0002535003,0.0019079183,0.021730337,0.001223806,0.002186423,0.001818433,0.0008559606,0.00049892097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047757756,0.00012783278,0.96667707,0.00020258581,0.0007973252,0.000065255605,0.00037886453,0.0007958537,0.00016254369,0.00023578892,0.0008872058,0.029192077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027698134,0.00015614703,0.9970203,0.00002583198,0.00021773182,0.00007922721,0.00069859816,0.001043087,0.00007946792,0.00016135644,0.00047642435,0.000014049681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19271405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18185692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035327964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007861961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3831846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040262509","doi":"10.1177/0002764214556803","title":"Changing Ties in a Far-Flung, Multidisciplinary Research Network","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Friendship; Interpersonal ties; Multidisciplinary approach; Strong ties; Public relations; Work (physics); Discipline; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5841317415057182,"score_gpt":0.6304464635516845,"score_spread":0.04631472204596632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040262509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98556143,0.000245852,0.0042413822,0.0012029614,0.000017722694,0.000038990835,0.000052532392,0.000015643756,0.008623425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586296,0.00018753501,0.0024169553,0.000118842974,0.000012776153,0.000043121494,0.000055537796,0.0000066448138,0.001295529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961033,0.0025890733,0.00009850118,0.0004994621,0.0003959858,0.00031366845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901344,0.00499578,0.0021495959,0.000527198,0.0005660931,0.001626938],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035680654,0.00020114373,0.0003398416,0.0025003452,0.005709763,0.005046276,0.00093979784,0.0014216426,0.003163464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014918902,0.000256475,0.0001939918,0.0036880318,0.0024192883,0.008246589,0.0039600935,0.00087610655,0.00046287905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008683047,0.0020179104,0.42931008,0.0005233404,0.00032067034,0.0055205566,0.21433088,0.012511621,0.0074830097,0.16491526,0.0075253723,0.15467301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034343937,0.0011209818,0.28317335,0.00044727072,0.00031428743,0.0032320947,0.41857067,0.045439735,0.001985428,0.15548985,0.08968836,0.0001945352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034343174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007299522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99749964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019336066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011124727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018869996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040368148","doi":"10.1002/jmv.20346","title":"Estimates of global research productivity in virology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Virology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Population; Per capita; Demography; Ranking (information retrieval); Geography; Citation; Bibliometrics; Socioeconomics; Library science; Medicine; Environmental health; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.7020022047232732,"score_gpt":0.6948214986987673,"score_spread":0.007180706024505934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040368148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8131031,0.06337999,0.018439049,0.0016730312,0.00024853344,0.00029015547,0.05455768,0.00053669454,0.047771867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958502,0.013802025,0.008762407,0.000071570124,0.00026300532,0.00022008286,0.01697398,0.000053086118,0.0013518068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248874,0.002207425,0.0012387529,0.0006967321,0.0030296326,0.0003387177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965322,0.016194407,0.010100811,0.002181438,0.0055545117,0.00064684777],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00970938,0.0006938914,0.0010481462,0.0520458,0.00030970803,0.0028194177,0.00055478496,0.00033966347,0.002077214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039490458,0.00021993533,0.0013657068,0.066292755,0.0006842255,0.0025690615,0.0018859924,0.00036468185,0.0006250738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015274958,0.000043463268,0.7984825,0.0023644255,0.0026082192,0.00029720625,0.002427408,0.0064632525,0.0012511812,0.005581569,0.003774484,0.1765535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013616601,0.00009552991,0.96593994,0.0002853011,0.0003884925,0.0006234438,0.0015494544,0.002192564,0.00064474205,0.003398466,0.024822816,0.000045628545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003554152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031231986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014793158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008608678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051348686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040419988","doi":"10.1037/a0021086","title":"The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5062710187992778,"score_gpt":0.6221058731479057,"score_spread":0.11583485434862784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040419988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62201834,0.035682544,0.002795878,0.2950584,0.0011435407,0.000046174726,0.00024457407,0.00013867942,0.042871904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735605,0.009430021,0.0011370513,0.012249183,0.0006438791,0.000016943939,0.000036620237,0.000017311377,0.0029085441],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728763,0.0009809625,0.00015615941,0.0002355269,0.0006472356,0.00069242076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97285575,0.01200051,0.007959261,0.0013041527,0.0017698305,0.0041105356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007344881,0.00018254266,0.00048742784,0.0012595502,0.0013274793,0.003927641,0.0007673801,0.0021261405,0.0035364325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03173128,0.00014710864,0.000515556,0.0016986053,0.003789164,0.0044103037,0.0018822317,0.001281709,0.0007677184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038597916,0.00037588656,0.4219214,0.0011022873,0.00023673683,0.0008000833,0.01149145,0.0012724389,0.0023254713,0.08251031,0.026293403,0.4512845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010944271,0.00082777196,0.6756772,0.0018664807,0.00031490237,0.0011414443,0.025252664,0.0012779377,0.003821484,0.13873659,0.15088114,0.00009294983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004290558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009226219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99874043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029471559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054995925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03884393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040658269","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1002010","title":"Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Tel Aviv University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Austrian Science Fund; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; King's College London; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Wellcome Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Robustness (evolution); Biology; Transformative learning; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","score_opus":0.5648574577525743,"score_gpt":0.5704503019238251,"score_spread":0.0055928441712507215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040658269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014092822,0.004921397,0.053087972,0.6916817,0.0035992442,0.0004009624,0.00015348919,0.00033168306,0.23173077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8472661,0.0027781085,0.026347391,0.08640444,0.009122943,0.0013579875,0.00010136568,0.0004945182,0.026127152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.4860075,0.3349583,0.02304467,0.033640075,0.101425976,0.020923443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11452459,0.6968429,0.04118846,0.08896778,0.048606742,0.009869558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43352208,0.000879163,0.0024317235,0.0063895737,0.016329248,0.03419019,0.0072799018,0.03835157,0.0119461175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.71604913,0.0021967492,0.001804031,0.0067221834,0.06640483,0.041471,0.018720537,0.02845575,0.0029075837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053207514,0.000027587246,0.0009688695,0.00021214168,0.000054562926,0.00039587234,0.0061221356,0.0003102121,0.00012777324,0.94546777,0.025106555,0.021153355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012621933,0.0000405033,0.0009492455,0.00072404597,0.000054336087,0.00048244605,0.0015790106,0.0013541016,0.00042279612,0.8810086,0.1131585,0.000100134836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077461484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005443112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140109435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061322335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6985681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041166561","doi":"10.12735/ier.v2i2p44","title":"Changing Institutional Research Productivity of United States’ Science Education Programs: 2000s v. 1990s","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Political science; Science education; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6934014789930255,"score_gpt":0.680352145609588,"score_spread":0.0130493333834375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041166561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664705,0.0066247047,0.00021598983,0.008432482,0.00016099245,0.000028797049,0.0029012917,0.00007750876,0.015087741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884134,0.0036831717,0.0004449387,0.001179285,0.0003220231,0.000042301588,0.0034963177,0.000022749831,0.0023958653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962739,0.0005037929,0.00038650987,0.00050530455,0.0016507868,0.0006796938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433321,0.009267238,0.023233222,0.001761079,0.014838713,0.007567595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007422729,0.00024434904,0.00044402914,0.016185855,0.0008529985,0.0045810775,0.0011158006,0.0008183288,0.0020521355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032999374,0.00020796833,0.00033672975,0.022355802,0.00091554614,0.0029325946,0.0024845882,0.0010585901,0.0003755118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048168493,0.0004915883,0.8171634,0.0006415147,0.00022783714,0.00029586194,0.004319332,0.00065119995,0.0025518192,0.0076193963,0.0160652,0.14949116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007848822,0.0000862455,0.9837081,0.00013998905,0.000026845415,0.00007611473,0.002075682,0.00013034747,0.00067963253,0.0002197715,0.012841709,0.000007806354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026547613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043690473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99257725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064374767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006680907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05278617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041552725","doi":"10.2466/pr0.106.3.891-900","title":"Predicting Long-Term Citation Impact of Articles in Social and Personality Psychology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Variance (accounting); Impact factor; Psychology; Personality; Sample (material); Social psychology; Library science; Political science; Accounting; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6770501935078974,"score_gpt":0.6678924215649938,"score_spread":0.00915777194290357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041552725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99563855,0.0020679273,0.0002929882,0.00013481794,0.000013370992,0.000025858273,0.0009993012,0.000014741569,0.00081243226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962257,0.000979376,0.0005104808,0.000012169982,0.00007928564,0.000027147124,0.0017762732,0.000005773455,0.00038382577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768114,0.0004811969,0.0004963813,0.00015848633,0.0010022781,0.00018045038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168339,0.042717855,0.024742292,0.0016883919,0.010743454,0.0032740228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066503393,0.0004315941,0.0006841237,0.018292535,0.000550673,0.0016900001,0.0004831437,0.0005768426,0.0017339737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051400814,0.00015063907,0.0007207718,0.01731282,0.00039091712,0.0014439491,0.0009856373,0.0005164512,0.000590292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008650228,0.00007650329,0.9866822,0.000090834226,0.0001798806,0.00008146646,0.00010812714,0.00022364843,0.00028399358,0.000045404493,0.00014354111,0.011998001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065008803,0.00009162777,0.9982527,0.000017291959,0.00006883171,0.00012726244,0.00011523636,0.00069724454,0.00020128289,0.00012022267,0.00029606227,0.000005800876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024907922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047214604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006933754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090381486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035170794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041712247","doi":"10.1126/science.330.6005.756-a","title":"Funding for Chinese Collaboration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.581687363507967,"score_gpt":0.633972770791863,"score_spread":0.05228540728389597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041712247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004483892,0.034745056,0.0048278193,0.47855425,0.1058951,0.00049901666,0.0018126213,0.0008092115,0.3683731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17134182,0.040378593,0.009848746,0.25103235,0.0672171,0.00275237,0.00625657,0.0012159977,0.4499564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883443,0.003683199,0.000730478,0.00096818706,0.0033120872,0.002961777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988963,0.0028857822,0.0011258658,0.001683546,0.0048414045,0.009573779],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01688663,0.0011262107,0.0008524704,0.0033760797,0.0063581914,0.008006694,0.0025590202,0.00537346,0.11073575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027046844,0.0005299341,0.001095477,0.004775417,0.002826829,0.0070955586,0.01587511,0.005642952,0.01806495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005439321,0.000017736309,0.0009521261,0.0007119191,0.000034241075,0.00023605218,0.0016456136,0.000057631773,0.0002020082,0.08120637,0.8294838,0.08539812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043210002,0.000015117807,0.0011757457,0.0002568688,0.000014265502,0.00011692352,0.0004648624,0.00007624796,0.00007470861,0.0050434913,0.9927053,0.0000132706355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090148635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014594197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98311335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009191639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055282768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.370448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041807538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.76","title":"Exploring How Library Publishing Services Facilitate Scholarly Communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Digitization; Certification; Promotion (chess); Function (biology); Electronic publishing; Popularity; Public relations; Library science; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Management; Economics; Telecommunications; The Internet","score_opus":0.8332413547542352,"score_gpt":0.4585807703599362,"score_spread":0.374660584394299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041807538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85793775,0.0014291476,0.0020729091,0.010190244,0.00007808564,0.00023616054,0.0002495678,0.00013307235,0.12767324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938246,0.0009741314,0.0014064356,0.00048280708,0.000081194696,0.00009207024,0.00009097121,0.00003578194,0.0030121133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97037154,0.019959511,0.0016654728,0.00074465154,0.0042232187,0.003035456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7884992,0.16399306,0.024054773,0.0033456217,0.013458513,0.006648813],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149381645,0.0003529011,0.0005009147,0.006881503,0.0054314234,0.01848905,0.0017067118,0.0017348594,0.015198366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12691376,0.0004273723,0.0007230875,0.010435963,0.0027668732,0.018575028,0.0077827414,0.0017196335,0.0027259742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006665563,0.0012442868,0.3962762,0.0018966243,0.00021680175,0.0018597902,0.27447397,0.0006836164,0.0010081755,0.043434877,0.011341317,0.26689774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018542288,0.00036616388,0.3105413,0.001362861,0.00034509823,0.0007608604,0.5720583,0.0028007608,0.0017784791,0.015813509,0.09383179,0.0001554394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011959554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012560637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98151094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073685036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012781491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07900149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042381952","doi":"10.1096/fj.05-4711lsf","title":"Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Quarter (Canadian coin); Geography; Population; Per capita; Latin Americans; World population; Rest (music); Impact factor; Citation; Demography; Ranking (information retrieval); Product (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine; Sociology; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.542214445398465,"score_gpt":0.5731093768053197,"score_spread":0.03089493140685473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042381952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878119,0.14076649,0.000411303,0.0010194705,0.0004274552,0.000075978736,0.05404952,0.00016737742,0.015270505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92296904,0.03862589,0.0014461916,0.0002467403,0.00060847314,0.0001258954,0.033311706,0.000071926144,0.0025941536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542123,0.00065760035,0.0014073376,0.00075914053,0.0012849111,0.00046980893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96985537,0.0065180967,0.01292522,0.0011535226,0.0077590006,0.0017887454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038611363,0.00074624404,0.0012751635,0.046240434,0.0005948262,0.0041221143,0.0007565965,0.0006852562,0.0025710026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017988535,0.00026405274,0.0013317284,0.06563518,0.000365207,0.001714644,0.0015757512,0.00039067108,0.0014323122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006662531,0.00008421783,0.8848102,0.004571132,0.0029513547,0.0012085774,0.0016194639,0.0006493699,0.0028496652,0.00072844746,0.008885959,0.090975314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027580496,0.00006929697,0.968458,0.0004461721,0.0013301654,0.0012976625,0.0011492213,0.00020773504,0.0012275551,0.00012761791,0.02562748,0.000031579275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009482819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010427737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001371897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018865059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020419836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042588761","doi":"10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f0e89","title":"Subspecialty Impact Factors: The Contribution of Pediatric Anesthesia and Pain Articles","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Subspecialty; Anesthesia; MEDLINE; Regional anesthesia; Intensive care medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.2796530443318512,"score_gpt":0.455819171698837,"score_spread":0.17616612736698584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042588761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6224103,0.3000929,0.0033198027,0.014490515,0.0030483461,0.0005794987,0.020544851,0.00033291013,0.03518081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331407,0.049408417,0.0036534676,0.00087463745,0.004123482,0.00017017957,0.006274334,0.00011970512,0.002235097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863874,0.0017691443,0.003396059,0.0009821266,0.006744157,0.0007211544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79955703,0.096763,0.06330118,0.003195601,0.029816804,0.0073663336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009056808,0.0007319193,0.0011552123,0.054138098,0.0010775785,0.004688006,0.0011367048,0.00090723106,0.0088642305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1275167,0.00026646542,0.0017868129,0.06719807,0.00080546824,0.0032537947,0.002165282,0.0010425816,0.0012048618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028319494,0.000082979896,0.879914,0.0046989103,0.0015176386,0.00067469483,0.00072206167,0.00020496298,0.0004117367,0.0008839498,0.0079927035,0.10261319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026380058,0.00009052138,0.97817355,0.001573014,0.00090505125,0.0023409785,0.0010712951,0.0003751621,0.00028419556,0.0012758723,0.0138541395,0.00002988665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063887388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007288825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020382225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042880005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047897518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042603474","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.l.00519","title":"Authorship Proliferation in the Orthopaedic Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Internationalization; Medicine; Currency; Impact factor; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4583888714888302,"score_gpt":0.47863406870016134,"score_spread":0.020245197211331167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042603474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965872,0.02310656,0.00063409144,0.0028094163,0.00029071604,0.00004263059,0.000901279,0.000030990315,0.006312289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948748,0.0032138538,0.00059149537,0.0002281203,0.00032828905,0.000021010668,0.00032586168,0.000008724278,0.0004078923],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906697,0.0026885837,0.0023366327,0.0014244256,0.0022295902,0.00065101153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7995451,0.06617664,0.09851194,0.0051122047,0.02578708,0.0048670894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008758564,0.00023878609,0.0004071184,0.02223428,0.0012596173,0.0039055948,0.0009883153,0.00078001287,0.0034390697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07381172,0.000266179,0.00045369403,0.020720078,0.002247381,0.004371438,0.0026957006,0.00065669755,0.00054337876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012713441,0.00003165341,0.945577,0.00062179414,0.0000749551,0.00087059254,0.0063305707,0.00022921762,0.0004471573,0.0010608714,0.0012435616,0.043385483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007980252,0.00009798795,0.9722653,0.00061042147,0.000056121717,0.0049085384,0.009530953,0.0003425996,0.00043880948,0.0016722591,0.010042547,0.000026454109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021413674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029586595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019180623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002086568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04632026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042604928","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0012203","title":"The United States of America and Scientific Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; U.S. Navy; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Advanced Research Projects Agency; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Natural Environment Research Council; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Per capita; China; Political science; Government (linguistics); European union; Population; Globalization; Economic growth; Regional science; Economics; Economic policy; Geography; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.7880966157939311,"score_gpt":0.5868889078938813,"score_spread":0.20120770790004983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042604928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007833671,0.08595333,0.0016649239,0.048431635,0.0070166048,0.00018491209,0.01074432,0.00026967155,0.837901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48663905,0.19938657,0.013465781,0.04727256,0.011080329,0.0028928432,0.039828125,0.0007284897,0.19870628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896492,0.0037446525,0.0009911379,0.0020030553,0.0025582917,0.0010537447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814571,0.0054095597,0.00429207,0.0017543889,0.0049006976,0.002186087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006843794,0.00080977794,0.0008826492,0.006606161,0.003191019,0.014118962,0.0010617453,0.0031633873,0.055391487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021116812,0.00023742442,0.00049587263,0.022596503,0.0046027927,0.009461729,0.0047138636,0.0039796494,0.018023875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050408886,0.00004113975,0.014940619,0.00078141893,0.000069470916,0.00018599477,0.001697341,0.00021571336,0.00008551884,0.53228545,0.3543235,0.09532343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009552647,0.000019880055,0.010806894,0.00070328265,0.00001668035,0.00017587969,0.0013267504,0.000055192682,0.00002543838,0.02938417,0.9574525,0.00002386708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016550662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016168823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99339384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047574886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012251224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18530297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043014255","doi":"10.1002/asi.21495","title":"Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Citation analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Information retrieval; Data science; Citation impact; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Mathematics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.48093983934431594,"score_gpt":0.545034406982603,"score_spread":0.06409456763828703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043014255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94403255,0.0066011804,0.039159965,0.00053341716,0.00015033144,0.0001428947,0.001648373,0.00021141258,0.007519835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785644,0.0010264096,0.017725306,0.000051749037,0.00010901981,0.0000976801,0.0019505693,0.000059459595,0.00041539644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97182626,0.013618655,0.0037819443,0.0023069293,0.007787725,0.0006784572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76381797,0.16798322,0.021971118,0.015435388,0.028204337,0.0025880367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043783706,0.00068906887,0.0023182041,0.042704348,0.0014482616,0.0055863135,0.0017426254,0.0010522903,0.0012771331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16811919,0.00024389212,0.0016596083,0.044813834,0.0011432436,0.0073004314,0.0022716562,0.00056276354,0.00048571598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012996732,0.0003386014,0.65534025,0.0016484176,0.0032625024,0.00024912436,0.0035473213,0.014189469,0.0025152848,0.0134800775,0.0044411877,0.29968807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001964713,0.00081291655,0.84613436,0.0010271324,0.0029374913,0.0008362505,0.007298081,0.074063145,0.008903649,0.043068685,0.014393784,0.00032812098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036320365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95729566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010923652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020947384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23155314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043428965","doi":"10.5703/1288284315239","title":"The British National Approach to Scholarly Communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"License; Publication; Scholarly communication; Excellence; Finch; Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Toolbox; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6395039357106561,"score_gpt":0.5713218405943833,"score_spread":0.06818209511627282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043428965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002200656,0.011568918,0.0016919124,0.05697277,0.0022118625,0.00004940434,0.00026477966,0.00009214977,0.9249475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14877184,0.015575665,0.0059022014,0.03220678,0.00088947144,0.0003454903,0.00035768608,0.00024367591,0.7957072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97774655,0.006892584,0.0011760963,0.0026709458,0.009009174,0.002504769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873674,0.004342326,0.00051525864,0.001046613,0.004608732,0.0021196823],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00931976,0.0006199937,0.00089633657,0.0057455213,0.016375897,0.023842407,0.002078187,0.008063529,0.043460187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018828742,0.0005858037,0.0005198088,0.0094821965,0.013117555,0.009177641,0.008062377,0.006914242,0.011297737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024770881,0.000021362186,0.0003675769,0.00027402397,0.0000081672615,0.00024886563,0.006505175,0.000090104026,0.000072289055,0.7744613,0.16769245,0.05023382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032402554,0.0000069348366,0.00060020876,0.0002808155,0.0000030856404,0.00014412196,0.0019884224,0.00006190131,0.000029233252,0.024074797,0.97279197,0.000015189446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25577244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34741783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055105235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052725103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50856733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043976883","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504701284","title":"Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last‐author‐based analysis to the author co‐citation analysis family","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Compromise; Field (mathematics); Citation; Computer science; Operations research; Library science; Data science; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.24700646458077738,"score_gpt":0.4998953364659076,"score_spread":0.2528888718851302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043976883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8411008,0.0039919163,0.113961354,0.0010668678,0.00025569432,0.00017954622,0.0046116565,0.0010023314,0.03382989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98091906,0.00025381782,0.01696709,0.000030257144,0.00011076411,0.00006462057,0.00093445275,0.00005874228,0.0006612242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.986102,0.005952504,0.0012144567,0.0016058341,0.004516723,0.0006085333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8343518,0.10830339,0.02049254,0.01206354,0.021408396,0.0033803668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014018745,0.00061035436,0.0015831452,0.04442764,0.0017273739,0.005895552,0.0013731754,0.000718424,0.0046600793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08046263,0.00016780356,0.0016803722,0.036437716,0.0011095083,0.004534715,0.0027613188,0.0008742211,0.0014401054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043197558,0.00019597518,0.80577785,0.00060669857,0.0023168141,0.00034139885,0.0025091716,0.010813767,0.0015536275,0.009921766,0.0044366512,0.16109432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011874545,0.00041736735,0.715579,0.00030679037,0.0017112681,0.0011492444,0.00701261,0.19703332,0.006554902,0.04558584,0.024214486,0.00031647008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00746556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006717368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011879122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022246568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07413912},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2044132506","doi":"10.1111/jan.12610","title":"Measuring research success via bibliometrics: where they fit and how they help and hinder","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.47244444723271695,"score_gpt":0.5649713516395085,"score_spread":0.09252690440679157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044132506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4057673,0.0859703,0.1210495,0.14458458,0.004806516,0.0028139194,0.012961032,0.0035551146,0.21849176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91052324,0.011521375,0.06305852,0.003867712,0.0017232902,0.0016484313,0.0029847345,0.0008022972,0.0038703892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7910941,0.08924837,0.032210935,0.00923815,0.07368835,0.0045200572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48017624,0.31767508,0.087707005,0.027820125,0.07875685,0.007864696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17089774,0.0023170775,0.0043598623,0.07134,0.0047035194,0.04163909,0.0027714309,0.0035852408,0.003433821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4439409,0.00130509,0.0028222278,0.096383415,0.008804756,0.034526106,0.013062883,0.0043879156,0.0024781122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029529934,0.00030371378,0.4664902,0.0067279655,0.0028847016,0.00024386987,0.033899322,0.0016272023,0.0009083057,0.084333554,0.030750608,0.37153524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015346476,0.00053928234,0.43911326,0.017108958,0.0019274078,0.0010026871,0.08769317,0.013550026,0.002859388,0.23296703,0.20202555,0.001059853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006899374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007865703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007853882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010823598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9038044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044326206","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2","title":"A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Sample (material); Impact factor; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.5726813817650799,"score_gpt":0.5567807477511177,"score_spread":0.015900634013962134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044326206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905818,0.13732405,0.01901542,0.061652426,0.002223657,0.000085206855,0.010037074,0.00050718617,0.17857315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538846,0.021749796,0.007078629,0.0035135383,0.003666196,0.000064126696,0.003234336,0.00022902714,0.006579754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033535,0.0025745109,0.0013337879,0.0007921261,0.004573605,0.000390565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80295736,0.14790855,0.018865088,0.008409617,0.018796984,0.0030624215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008835684,0.0005922791,0.001411922,0.050338976,0.0019466348,0.013379782,0.00147489,0.0024110945,0.011648217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085262746,0.0005054734,0.0014907952,0.051186573,0.0044607166,0.020826377,0.005228026,0.0030443163,0.0014093078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095905806,0.00032026414,0.5586047,0.0035597275,0.0025463053,0.0019143724,0.010519221,0.00040288517,0.0060778847,0.10847855,0.019055506,0.28756154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014526203,0.0005414673,0.6830616,0.0038991817,0.003147718,0.005374757,0.021137739,0.0015040328,0.0054953415,0.14179842,0.13362451,0.00026996495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002521014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005235863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014292363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015116582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046728134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2044671206","doi":"10.3917/riss.168.0269","title":"Évolution des modes de financement de la recherche (1960-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale des sciences sociales","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9313555850670325,"score_gpt":0.6443014754273197,"score_spread":0.2870541096397128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044671206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31566903,0.0047743577,0.019260805,0.011871238,0.00018361214,0.00024018485,0.003111953,0.0006469807,0.64424187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768662,0.0021935347,0.017238183,0.0004089713,0.00006856499,0.00022295282,0.00091362983,0.00017162028,0.20191652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965216,0.0010685757,0.00018882881,0.0006756715,0.0010424067,0.00050287787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919565,0.0023816044,0.0015788224,0.0011532458,0.0019947302,0.0009349986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047462606,0.00046712873,0.00028106663,0.0050531183,0.0019154687,0.009698657,0.00089448574,0.0016356247,0.017479217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016205639,0.0006168934,0.00061554427,0.00537134,0.0035171928,0.0048136776,0.0025558954,0.0018261359,0.004334526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027084374,0.00007165163,0.031812653,0.00007779061,0.00004614157,0.00016739067,0.005490309,0.0018730811,0.0009336284,0.8544802,0.008429226,0.096347176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019803719,0.00028748668,0.17535934,0.0005204897,0.000053272423,0.0008311066,0.0057520894,0.007856571,0.0024499742,0.12363699,0.682932,0.00012270964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08725371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06653667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99525374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025650572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008822414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18610883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046328526","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450440112","title":"The future of institutional repositories: The experts (and audience) debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Scholarly communication; Publication; Public relations; Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Publishing; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08386701705862125,"score_gpt":0.4368450572268911,"score_spread":0.35297804016826984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046328526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030342552,0.005972744,0.0009554321,0.9743838,0.0014317861,0.000010888767,0.000040857594,0.000024030394,0.014146216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3748698,0.03285306,0.0059310882,0.5319204,0.026999146,0.0002940501,0.00017296555,0.00031236553,0.026647128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9023896,0.065013506,0.004001771,0.006117839,0.016369633,0.006107739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78367347,0.15851086,0.008777135,0.008133102,0.027538225,0.013367155],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16125925,0.00072372664,0.0015368324,0.0050674817,0.014927355,0.055470604,0.005251797,0.046822615,0.018120307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121887416,0.00073297543,0.0016322908,0.006523562,0.025807153,0.09280369,0.017737163,0.023755757,0.0029156709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000815541,0.00011226359,0.0011513812,0.0005385616,0.000023346753,0.0002515013,0.02200761,0.0004831126,0.00027203216,0.6821917,0.23125748,0.061629422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004699413,0.000090182235,0.0015759442,0.0023179788,0.00003808235,0.00030694008,0.07327805,0.00086179585,0.00042804264,0.20508982,0.7157883,0.0001778713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004332621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035361398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018110754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017962156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85283065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046460409","doi":"10.1108/10650750910961929","title":"Bioline International","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OCLC Systems & Services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Bandwagon effect; Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.48290449113346096,"score_gpt":0.5885778883372986,"score_spread":0.10567339720383767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046460409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019230038,0.0062637287,0.0012263113,0.020986298,0.0069493093,0.00015917292,0.00479196,0.0011362084,0.9565641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025401335,0.007814727,0.0032650759,0.012474738,0.0029953308,0.00049542304,0.0075010387,0.0013575355,0.9386947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953793,0.00090516673,0.00028988087,0.0010719157,0.0018409187,0.0005128338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923126,0.0011116047,0.0007752603,0.0011430812,0.0023490072,0.0023083894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004011545,0.0008567529,0.0006706307,0.0030568328,0.0024202631,0.012065675,0.0021756266,0.002506121,0.43240988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011817219,0.000433214,0.0006168337,0.0036935424,0.002127302,0.0070237517,0.0070898063,0.0041697356,0.28464594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120312085,0.000059705406,0.0012328137,0.00077775354,0.0000119776005,0.0002209367,0.00070263876,0.00007933244,0.0003355206,0.11367873,0.72736406,0.15541627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048247007,0.000013146328,0.00048497392,0.00015738304,0.0000014707604,0.00009557843,0.0001366317,0.000014132536,0.00005568202,0.0012531341,0.99777895,0.00000406291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024330483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002692216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5675901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003512313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006391754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80959845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047959601","doi":"10.1007/s11999-010-1365-x","title":"Low-income Countries' Orthopaedic Information Needs: Challenges and Opportunities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; The Internet; Internet access; Medicine; Globe; Health care; Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Economic growth; Computer science; Advertising; Economics","score_opus":0.5763091622547795,"score_gpt":0.5698602443635455,"score_spread":0.0064489178912339185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047959601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5957272,0.026382456,0.0009113364,0.34155634,0.0009903356,0.00020499331,0.0038639691,0.00012129824,0.03024209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579711,0.019226857,0.002342648,0.015754541,0.00093714107,0.00018305081,0.0014893207,0.00003804528,0.0020572508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335575,0.0025899047,0.0008430117,0.00042596433,0.0011194546,0.0016659749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629521,0.01815638,0.0055141905,0.0004012101,0.0038758863,0.009100206],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072392207,0.00032150888,0.00058022526,0.0037424131,0.0032957476,0.0068631344,0.0016287783,0.0022312403,0.011498509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0322829,0.00042038184,0.00039985505,0.0070589744,0.002815708,0.0069685024,0.005043557,0.0016584512,0.0013198709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024930938,0.0006530516,0.45493746,0.008832162,0.00010937928,0.004246869,0.0973972,0.0004500971,0.0008690203,0.011189975,0.10819235,0.3128732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005463604,0.00027335362,0.35734287,0.007984482,0.00008530062,0.0033906419,0.50890374,0.00065410306,0.00026158828,0.009165816,0.11171178,0.00017164937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02361208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021602344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019820274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009752139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046949267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048185449","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0013636","title":"Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":603,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Citation; Logistic regression; Publication bias; Test (biology); Computer science; Psychology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.9343763586818292,"score_gpt":0.7250463403971983,"score_spread":0.20933001828463094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048185449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98286486,0.0022223326,0.001412385,0.0033268265,0.00011611211,0.00008185885,0.0004116738,0.00016543987,0.0093985405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954299,0.00053479517,0.0021044577,0.00037920452,0.00034770227,0.00002942086,0.0001415598,0.000038079266,0.0009950288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916592,0.0030737822,0.0012298176,0.0009589639,0.0024889386,0.00058938685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7158201,0.15460645,0.084449925,0.01527611,0.01288374,0.016963793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013949708,0.00032953103,0.0005775507,0.0041386504,0.0011414204,0.0048842835,0.00079028873,0.0013814778,0.013459618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13724324,0.00027835774,0.0011756226,0.0069669127,0.0017379782,0.0042355875,0.0040863925,0.0010804217,0.0014604917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006684191,0.0006090307,0.9105924,0.00059042376,0.00034035675,0.00024840195,0.0013218314,0.0003282128,0.0018834552,0.0019146611,0.001859447,0.07964335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007054174,0.00031992098,0.99075633,0.00008852229,0.00019238664,0.00031488747,0.00057676237,0.0004046533,0.00072130305,0.004059755,0.0024682342,0.000026857817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014836879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023902229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011429829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027825641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07377398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048231489","doi":"10.1087/095315107779490599","title":"The impact of open access publishing (and other access initiatives) on use and users of digital scholarly journals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Publishing; Order (exchange); Scholarly communication; Open access publishing; Library science; Electronic publishing; Digital library; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; History; Art; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.800087479290809,"score_gpt":0.6489497974727992,"score_spread":0.1511376818180098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048231489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883025,0.00071624614,0.0000483347,0.0008481791,0.000011536339,0.000012040307,0.00042992827,0.00001001343,0.009621262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984547,0.00029759516,0.000045596895,0.000049247534,0.000033657645,0.0000056431213,0.0001657645,0.000004281641,0.00094351015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927221,0.0023226452,0.0006720171,0.00033203518,0.0031750274,0.0007761264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8760722,0.068520024,0.032178648,0.0027573667,0.008353593,0.0121181905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046548517,0.00012071236,0.00026553418,0.0062327473,0.0007968582,0.004982187,0.0006406048,0.00053722877,0.0070598773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04402168,0.00013695158,0.00038553454,0.0073961634,0.0012646171,0.0037127396,0.0023250887,0.0010239419,0.0006514424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004414892,0.0002626839,0.9476998,0.00012556942,0.00008372222,0.00026153005,0.0037063146,0.0001829551,0.0005559671,0.0018766243,0.001381275,0.04342212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060330476,0.0001140725,0.9932006,0.00002896302,0.000020571908,0.00016686153,0.003553597,0.00023571271,0.00027023643,0.00030007362,0.0020893936,0.000013877472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062723896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008814328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99935937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019489652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012202599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024617493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048348243","doi":"10.1037/a0022466","title":"Commentary: Who measures those who measure? The future of assessing research activity in Canadian psychology.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Applied psychology; Test validity; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7334151713013151,"score_gpt":0.5952892522588137,"score_spread":0.13812591904250138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048348243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091754104,0.0043286094,0.00012345651,0.9734972,0.02137242,0.00001263575,0.000115339135,0.000015166588,0.0004434426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005333097,0.0055346517,0.00090597733,0.94957715,0.03633762,0.000073880736,0.00009341484,0.0000668216,0.0020774382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.919283,0.025675619,0.009179705,0.0074127666,0.035205096,0.003243867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52343196,0.23186307,0.013368485,0.005167888,0.21033476,0.015833853],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05375199,0.0016801986,0.0030817725,0.0074630096,0.015148687,0.012150461,0.011529085,0.038230013,0.0046980553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32573944,0.0013634,0.0020272888,0.014569927,0.020774936,0.014156653,0.0041570254,0.038485296,0.0043073585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023416822,0.000005035871,0.00017933124,0.0002642719,0.000014727033,0.00006497116,0.0010350922,0.000022516839,0.000050305458,0.0018815533,0.99239504,0.0040636593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008384721,0.000036104906,0.0029290991,0.0033036883,0.0001139574,0.00053191854,0.010152211,0.00040587006,0.00038835668,0.011869376,0.96985775,0.00032774347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51172006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52237946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99253696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049777463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08338195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048354789","doi":"10.1159/000337170","title":"Measuring Impact in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: An Analysis of the Top 100 Most Highly Cited Works and the Citation Classics in the Field","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Neurosurgery; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Medical physics; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Psychology; General surgery; Surgery; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30928115407626167,"score_gpt":0.42221666532777635,"score_spread":0.11293551125151469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048354789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70252323,0.14477406,0.004642732,0.0036592798,0.00094759156,0.0014633114,0.112901166,0.00091165426,0.028177053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83883506,0.054643717,0.020429881,0.00067136396,0.0012859915,0.0020017095,0.07633973,0.000372842,0.005419687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97481596,0.0027754072,0.0071408916,0.0019680737,0.012322768,0.0009769532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82464176,0.1073744,0.03400071,0.003569469,0.026997758,0.0034158658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075336,0.0010513639,0.0028565137,0.14841768,0.0021129376,0.0060934396,0.0022697796,0.001537975,0.006260322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11334874,0.00043944395,0.002377505,0.16326803,0.0014434955,0.005076977,0.00421533,0.0008595592,0.0023770775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016297734,0.0002985362,0.6243386,0.07196411,0.0034674197,0.002800543,0.009727615,0.0014673482,0.0076037226,0.005683328,0.05111697,0.21990205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016645029,0.00036856835,0.89017916,0.00457658,0.002692309,0.0037170234,0.007188586,0.0019516818,0.0026426658,0.0043169535,0.08197836,0.00022148642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054637864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008794462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025232548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031762696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109755516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048980934","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.4.02","title":"Open Access in China: A Study of Social Science Journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"China; Citation; Publishing; Science Citation Index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7070312947661989,"score_gpt":0.6487025814534676,"score_spread":0.05832871331273126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048980934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99789643,0.00044693146,0.000018894378,0.0002631133,0.000006662066,0.000016944823,0.0002543975,0.0000035186865,0.0010931666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861956,0.0004893849,0.00003785498,0.000068846435,0.000038033304,0.00001625922,0.00033644892,0.0000021436267,0.00039149015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966035,0.0003512975,0.000692533,0.00036737448,0.0014580803,0.0005271943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98511696,0.0029367062,0.0063635497,0.0003681284,0.0025714315,0.0026431605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023248175,0.0003812212,0.00079952873,0.01644183,0.0024172694,0.0032213526,0.00072591694,0.00066958717,0.0024055785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008042,0.0003072125,0.00058821985,0.029277166,0.0013114279,0.0028084086,0.0017440785,0.0003162665,0.00028648975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061347564,0.00009175321,0.98143816,0.00014349105,0.00007615122,0.000680406,0.008004388,0.00005368515,0.0004788254,0.000382618,0.00036850423,0.008220643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067867018,0.000052700892,0.9938446,0.000017859411,0.000021194865,0.0001441211,0.0047216974,0.00013686085,0.00007063481,0.00010265881,0.0008706725,0.000010208197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044430785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04316075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042064125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005449495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088344336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049245574","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0004048","title":"The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Pace; Population ageing; Gerontology; Citation; Bibliometrics; Creativity; Worry; Population; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7380393402328145,"score_gpt":0.5335089176316571,"score_spread":0.2045304226011574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049245574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98815966,0.0028327366,0.00031562624,0.0009037851,0.000029797815,0.000014949882,0.0032067415,0.000032342014,0.0045043053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967378,0.0006129801,0.0001521556,0.00006390556,0.000030085508,0.000008252593,0.0010518646,0.000008506848,0.0013345062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971551,0.000544933,0.00047289341,0.00045822232,0.0007610378,0.0006078944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94433236,0.017424183,0.01995545,0.0029237703,0.011517016,0.0038473487],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067041805,0.00016828266,0.00047184314,0.008561945,0.0008193385,0.0017226681,0.0006747687,0.00052304455,0.0033786155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036630575,0.00016276077,0.00046939935,0.010485226,0.00068757095,0.0014758783,0.0009049515,0.000417314,0.0011389663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001445219,0.000021860511,0.9767397,0.00005790987,0.00007413287,0.00009525278,0.0013701423,0.0002564194,0.00047378274,0.00041299994,0.0010205667,0.019332713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016749681,0.00001661866,0.9986816,0.000006701911,0.000011719437,0.000034253477,0.0002730968,0.00014373676,0.00006603601,0.0000857389,0.0006740753,0.0000047479452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08262154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12787174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99329585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018574958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018574382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16428125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049647990","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0099-8","title":"Visualization of citation patterns of some Canadian journals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Visualization; Computer science; Information visualization; Citation analysis; Data science; Information retrieval; Informetrics; Information science; Order (exchange); Library science; Bibliometrics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5363669360498906,"score_gpt":0.5783523202939667,"score_spread":0.04198538424407605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049647990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006504,0.0029150068,0.0031017584,0.0018097238,0.00015312526,0.00010665661,0.02694455,0.0021635569,0.062155183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654025,0.0018488445,0.010614131,0.00005058633,0.000049834704,0.000045182594,0.0075076376,0.0001678316,0.014313439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993037,0.000038873837,0.00004386492,0.00007521057,0.0003412441,0.000197133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459887,0.0008707075,0.00039635986,0.00012382702,0.0034872852,0.00052302715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005971239,0.00054167875,0.0003977379,0.029114489,0.0025646226,0.0033611774,0.0007450173,0.00047868927,0.00904304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049871276,0.00021279359,0.0006428993,0.041911248,0.0004563422,0.00077160343,0.00063897733,0.00042145277,0.0007509306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015283785,0.00017544064,0.3126207,0.0025376158,0.00049532496,0.001921266,0.011715004,0.011145112,0.033750813,0.03066383,0.08334497,0.51010156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006496798,0.0000816957,0.8658166,0.00023365118,0.00035959412,0.00044146742,0.0063903797,0.01996744,0.009083298,0.0030384727,0.09432976,0.00019272354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9159471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9358894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018510718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16909581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049981895","doi":"10.1515/cclm.2009.327","title":"Journal Impact Factor: it will go away soon","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Operations research; Psychology; Library science; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5947504583832548,"score_gpt":0.6436416375063311,"score_spread":0.04889117912307628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049981895","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068515347,0.024052953,0.011341214,0.22882855,0.4474376,0.0014573556,0.0137934005,0.04274908,0.22965465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010707541,0.037169848,0.035231143,0.16034259,0.33412993,0.002966051,0.017814778,0.036024023,0.36561406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9334588,0.009411073,0.0062188217,0.0035840913,0.043009393,0.0043177553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68133223,0.032782506,0.018705675,0.027019449,0.19042431,0.04973576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061101712,0.005730377,0.008476062,0.020069059,0.0069812974,0.05701089,0.005353047,0.01871082,0.31270713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20360865,0.0037193173,0.0039353715,0.01827378,0.006111982,0.029277248,0.01055494,0.02017117,0.54419154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041259864,0.000028545957,0.00012299877,0.00039079538,0.00002181761,0.000015704687,0.000041285017,0.000023403554,0.00011771195,0.0018743399,0.96709657,0.030225562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041682706,0.000056873232,0.00067400205,0.00069947477,0.00001968559,0.00007695998,0.00008308647,0.00006881045,0.00013930416,0.0066165156,0.9914492,0.000074381125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021333678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021398203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97993094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069020404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02051896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050885411","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.163.79","title":"Research Trends of Mechanism and Machine Theory Using Bibliometrics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Bibliometrics; Mechanism (biology); Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Social science; Political science; Regional science; History; Library science; Data science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6368217407589188,"score_gpt":0.5625886931724329,"score_spread":0.07423304758648597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050885411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8679155,0.03773285,0.014750903,0.004692423,0.00034621524,0.00016256521,0.004486787,0.00041684415,0.06949596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786527,0.011393164,0.006023065,0.00011744088,0.000399801,0.00007514216,0.0016682977,0.000037980455,0.0016323962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191564,0.001794182,0.00089895114,0.0008615375,0.0041599795,0.0003696825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748336,0.0108387,0.006787778,0.0016378979,0.0052502905,0.00065166893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074382625,0.00042712115,0.00088472315,0.056559317,0.00091591483,0.0053245677,0.0006718036,0.0007033197,0.001987692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030113433,0.00020435313,0.0009155837,0.071645446,0.00095563306,0.006671092,0.0014121521,0.0006522279,0.0006193804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020557032,0.00013606378,0.59902143,0.0019057094,0.0007548178,0.0005059328,0.0038861197,0.0036832448,0.0035330835,0.040999383,0.0070911483,0.33827752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032275795,0.00028354864,0.8349333,0.0009447075,0.0006106227,0.00148407,0.0056865946,0.025818814,0.0064158863,0.028820243,0.09481889,0.00015110528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026016296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022786842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99256176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022928515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025314447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039337754},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2051214338","doi":"10.7202/800289ar","title":"Information Science: The Canadian Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Discipline; Identification (biology); Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Engineering ethics; Information science; Sociology; Graduate education; Library science; Data science; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15969466995148446,"score_gpt":0.4137607682439299,"score_spread":0.2540660982924454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051214338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0150166275,0.09823724,0.0019622692,0.30123466,0.0022447163,0.0000847054,0.002084733,0.00011422452,0.5790208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65288264,0.22361976,0.00589091,0.03769629,0.0016123645,0.00009705163,0.001006189,0.00016475412,0.077029966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925436,0.0015940642,0.0004497937,0.0010167088,0.005107399,0.002577773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97963196,0.003570312,0.0009455275,0.00047522466,0.010232799,0.0051441276],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058954298,0.00057277066,0.0009641851,0.009661809,0.022958752,0.023568032,0.0022293187,0.0034976914,0.014495675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015171463,0.00047624318,0.00042725654,0.029306654,0.023423446,0.005896785,0.005742662,0.0051020402,0.0011381302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021787135,0.000026904547,0.0026248628,0.0006320532,0.00002258833,0.00045681125,0.006857124,0.0006039577,0.00019836891,0.85184747,0.09786589,0.038842242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008801732,0.000010225702,0.009707489,0.0010857697,0.000025205592,0.0001425042,0.009029609,0.00032762325,0.00009624108,0.044123627,0.93537337,0.00006949148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27336553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42514694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.842793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051301569","doi":"10.1007/s10508-005-0997-5","title":"The Impact Factor: “Goin’ Up”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.5877188112243503,"score_gpt":0.5868411611024329,"score_spread":0.0008776501219174282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051301569","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041142575,0.0010235617,0.00029041595,0.9844263,0.0102592185,0.000006051783,0.000036422203,0.000029588235,0.0035168966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010624152,0.00052546937,0.00046205067,0.95781654,0.024541177,0.000023581837,0.000023109584,0.000027871733,0.005955995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982454,0.0050803935,0.0021028616,0.0018368742,0.0071151317,0.001410679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233004,0.050590146,0.0038655887,0.004103615,0.012755166,0.0053849667],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593733,0.0009576793,0.002513116,0.0024037343,0.005924606,0.0071384986,0.0020867684,0.04863867,0.00707251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14016572,0.0006797953,0.0016021866,0.0023386579,0.013263288,0.009389263,0.0036783954,0.04517741,0.006262034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006615768,0.00002778594,0.0008763027,0.000044187258,0.000020614363,0.00038375423,0.00021656755,0.000028843911,0.00010351077,0.024933046,0.9539918,0.019307574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018877737,0.00010443068,0.004885476,0.00065657403,0.000073391566,0.0018343553,0.0014331065,0.0008548465,0.0007086653,0.15638177,0.8327069,0.00017170746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075490014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131997345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99759626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061969976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006163005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08428568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051771537","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405","title":"The power of altmetrics on a CV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Social media; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1260122823245402,"score_gpt":0.4456347829134141,"score_spread":0.31962250058887387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051771537","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029050644,0.04527699,0.2624977,0.1946864,0.3431608,0.0007612058,0.006858638,0.008238545,0.10946911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45062935,0.018738698,0.20512716,0.023795566,0.26532406,0.0011461561,0.002943919,0.004893798,0.027401185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92133087,0.032556824,0.008341755,0.005146301,0.03197011,0.0006540797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39692017,0.34588346,0.02657139,0.023371313,0.20318457,0.0040691583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079373136,0.0015330323,0.0023827336,0.024889363,0.0024138568,0.015354768,0.0025823778,0.0019685389,0.014667582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5670987,0.0006316509,0.0014266233,0.021777444,0.0045421836,0.009831768,0.004018413,0.0048619327,0.007341735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004082537,0.000055228847,0.010114963,0.0013044933,0.00032067831,0.00024103043,0.00069345074,0.002495047,0.00043911714,0.06354132,0.54874843,0.37163794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014737797,0.0003475521,0.015280917,0.0028466564,0.00052407954,0.0006511464,0.0007985457,0.042309385,0.002483047,0.15067391,0.78352827,0.0004090773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020119194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001952063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97511065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002803564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034725284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4197703},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2053904592","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2013.06.012","title":"Rate and Predictors of the Conversion of Abstracts Presented at the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress Scientific Meetings to Full Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Peer review; Library science; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.21307298930433674,"score_gpt":0.40276341867093046,"score_spread":0.18969042936659372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053904592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96245164,0.012221666,0.00055659696,0.0028543554,0.00048549983,0.00016038341,0.008003158,0.00015948093,0.013107158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897585,0.0029605844,0.000370371,0.00020493526,0.00030156272,0.000055616645,0.003187451,0.00003185591,0.0031291603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388874,0.0013030617,0.0012894529,0.0007276116,0.0023196691,0.00047156832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94286543,0.01787962,0.017900936,0.004749333,0.011677649,0.0049270983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066635446,0.00027608025,0.0005809319,0.0062259105,0.0007984579,0.003494537,0.0009838884,0.0013210519,0.00851097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07628206,0.0002867231,0.0012791326,0.0054238634,0.00039564853,0.0011733611,0.0011127032,0.00212429,0.0018850556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068257755,0.000117036754,0.9755967,0.0002036347,0.00028681188,0.00022626713,0.000291053,0.00015820732,0.00041464905,0.00015707723,0.0048496537,0.017016232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018013681,0.00006747536,0.99574465,0.000077951125,0.00011336101,0.00076860754,0.0005336061,0.00058495085,0.00016218299,0.00013797541,0.0017657736,0.000025416422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025388477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017385151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011324859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026503305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05048138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054290911","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-4817","title":"When postpublication peer review stings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science","score_opus":0.30855041255434634,"score_gpt":0.510706414487853,"score_spread":0.2021560019335067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054290911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04873773,0.012640599,0.044599786,0.51351345,0.10026667,0.0039354134,0.0013574903,0.007490696,0.26745817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48343357,0.0078628715,0.03411984,0.15058354,0.10039463,0.0048385854,0.0018174232,0.006747998,0.21020153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6221202,0.1271698,0.037915286,0.014691353,0.18434608,0.013757263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19294786,0.3068829,0.10696925,0.13023351,0.23417501,0.02879154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21193798,0.001129437,0.002413471,0.007632799,0.009482904,0.029973194,0.0035465471,0.02062068,0.03998775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7152682,0.0017086758,0.0014501502,0.007843589,0.009364388,0.023000473,0.0134037975,0.014303721,0.034843072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006547334,0.00011117253,0.008162841,0.0011685172,0.0001625036,0.0032228334,0.01867107,0.00016271326,0.002045241,0.03209303,0.7996218,0.13392358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001311815,0.00025401692,0.00897293,0.0016545638,0.00009621179,0.0018476098,0.007837201,0.0012108316,0.0031504708,0.029787697,0.94480383,0.00025344465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003261155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007468313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78806204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007938182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021795781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054475857","doi":"10.1177/0883073808331366","title":"Impact Factor Wars: Episode V—The Empire Strikes Back","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Child Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Factor (programming language); Psychology; History; Psychoanalysis; Ancient history; Computer science","score_opus":0.29316972150025267,"score_gpt":0.5416591324474231,"score_spread":0.24848941094717047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054475857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03986205,0.012516286,0.0032910926,0.53862697,0.061152205,0.0002958848,0.0008634952,0.0006553385,0.3427367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32074726,0.013039749,0.0030464872,0.32659116,0.035462562,0.00032872232,0.0013027373,0.0011547959,0.29832652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485564,0.0009489089,0.00024244194,0.0003433998,0.002488797,0.0011207805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935841,0.0021750112,0.00059495564,0.00036823432,0.0018331639,0.0014445398],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004145202,0.00080207444,0.00048705534,0.0017812176,0.009357689,0.01417919,0.0010262664,0.006701425,0.008753907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021441989,0.0005292247,0.0006578762,0.0018736379,0.0039112014,0.0060565975,0.0045983596,0.013819363,0.0027491185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000646086,0.000038669325,0.0011154314,0.00010214822,0.000019962254,0.0012844709,0.011963928,0.000058659298,0.00034161782,0.029536666,0.92855215,0.026921727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075118455,0.000023056238,0.0009587711,0.00012090425,0.000007337071,0.00041663522,0.004739589,0.000060692866,0.00023088198,0.0023052194,0.9911096,0.000019726876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026376054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034383543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007538949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045143077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054699123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055778626","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0127-6","title":"Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Exploratory research; Information science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5600534252037995,"score_gpt":0.6469165712479984,"score_spread":0.08686314604419887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055778626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.826115,0.0070369896,0.052432884,0.004579157,0.0002623105,0.00065908575,0.003012625,0.0005804684,0.105321564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96948034,0.0011100034,0.025828285,0.000072956034,0.00011128402,0.00018874888,0.00045247166,0.00008632164,0.0026696224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97212243,0.014277156,0.0014970894,0.0010000052,0.0103569,0.0007463603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828311,0.09328696,0.0073590646,0.003070914,0.011453061,0.001998968],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020632071,0.0008557229,0.001405375,0.042790096,0.0026852703,0.009721202,0.0016545202,0.0025439712,0.0045994665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05741834,0.00031852722,0.0017710633,0.04877802,0.0026621672,0.0073921173,0.002386493,0.0013762605,0.00088515447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010384246,0.0036095923,0.46461362,0.0030321307,0.0013743305,0.0033894514,0.016344316,0.018878097,0.013383387,0.10466214,0.008537301,0.3611373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031316956,0.0039956146,0.5522988,0.0011617256,0.0026552223,0.0074448953,0.04930792,0.21230094,0.035582997,0.08529421,0.048817366,0.00082711666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057120514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00837749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00452494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036368677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10911411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056445822","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0010","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056445822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54658455,0.11314074,0.001613211,0.035130415,0.0021863212,0.00037282353,0.06173314,0.0004407286,0.238798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85626125,0.04725152,0.0013147079,0.0021458608,0.0023868298,0.00014384682,0.03199564,0.00010659096,0.058393847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540174,0.00020725167,0.0008099611,0.00072504976,0.0024605268,0.00039544585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96454895,0.0064541386,0.012183671,0.0010983561,0.013123406,0.0025915669],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042544957,0.00045898464,0.00034610313,0.013484987,0.0015911238,0.009701309,0.0013484097,0.0021048146,0.0085065635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03481938,0.00045067674,0.00028563966,0.028392432,0.0023615945,0.008902502,0.0022029162,0.001802123,0.004387651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002434319,0.0005014935,0.31936216,0.0035672288,0.00017931328,0.00071423815,0.014087044,0.0015054853,0.002748178,0.04366328,0.09557275,0.51566446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383909,0.00010450206,0.61398816,0.000923867,0.00006157589,0.0003770362,0.002587401,0.000384466,0.0018872579,0.0016964957,0.37790826,0.00004721062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06050641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08023769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015007937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072878907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12030846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057169622","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0010","title":"The Impact of Submission Experiences on Perceptions of Journal Quality and Editorial Support: The Viewpoint of Chinese Authors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33476998793629176,"score_gpt":0.5821611179379163,"score_spread":0.2473911300016245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057169622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965951,0.000271197,0.00012863018,0.0004920405,0.00004591383,0.000011194854,0.000016346257,0.000003754992,0.0024359862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988998,0.00020045141,0.0001130677,0.00015248303,0.00005325316,0.000007934905,0.000013624613,0.0000033112103,0.0005561427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173975,0.0034730763,0.0009604,0.00033168608,0.0028926572,0.0006024551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.917665,0.042531308,0.019639105,0.002205949,0.01187306,0.0060855807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101978285,0.0002871504,0.00042695366,0.0014780366,0.0022062233,0.0035352344,0.00039570342,0.0005866477,0.0015408737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062368374,0.00021362139,0.00029682065,0.00138593,0.0019813247,0.0018362469,0.0014918034,0.00078655477,0.00024891572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006354341,0.0002982199,0.59311485,0.00041586778,0.00015417449,0.0018971654,0.35708314,0.00018277584,0.003455323,0.0009733827,0.0019311506,0.039858617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089137895,0.00057803787,0.6680758,0.00022541577,0.00012662732,0.0013356698,0.3128523,0.00083340873,0.0018880113,0.001427013,0.012401674,0.00016686697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060484563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006406243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012609258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026784255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05393195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058244584","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0010204","title":"Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Citation; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.830204442325836,"score_gpt":0.6593123227215533,"score_spread":0.17089211960428274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058244584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45393983,0.008004074,0.49565238,0.0024484582,0.00055701355,0.0032475307,0.010332197,0.002653305,0.023165349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73166984,0.001336416,0.26013336,0.0001271207,0.0004028613,0.001681564,0.0034332855,0.0001604653,0.0010550909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97390217,0.008085825,0.004356311,0.0026459745,0.010496763,0.0005128534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89120996,0.048996516,0.027330771,0.0060361996,0.024037968,0.002388635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032043826,0.002034181,0.0022786225,0.058133576,0.0013181883,0.0062964596,0.0017260087,0.00067226443,0.0040405793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094634056,0.0004967291,0.0041113016,0.05033894,0.0018423069,0.0036357827,0.003339739,0.0014688156,0.00076275604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038128966,0.000330965,0.5961216,0.0019195447,0.0049732537,0.00027841635,0.003146459,0.005926244,0.0023391296,0.008435078,0.0050895484,0.3710584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001331008,0.0012004339,0.8514618,0.000888989,0.001636619,0.00091807405,0.004920244,0.070026524,0.003074062,0.04817184,0.017140301,0.0004280477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053633545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007049258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030029668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005080654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16946602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058498906","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y","title":"Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Productivity; Scientometrics; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Social science","score_opus":0.872966831153213,"score_gpt":0.6254438142378042,"score_spread":0.2475230169154089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058498906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932714,0.0017678088,0.000109940695,0.00044827728,0.000013482675,0.00001980476,0.0016429813,0.000008212246,0.0027182119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569404,0.00047883912,0.00009094507,0.000094402196,0.000009725724,0.00001564627,0.00068510254,0.00000837486,0.002922863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840397,0.0002666056,0.00007272782,0.00019226667,0.00056558946,0.0004989287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99064225,0.0025154813,0.0017171383,0.00023820835,0.0032202136,0.0016667942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016477134,0.00020885283,0.00062989455,0.0040297364,0.0022131968,0.0018307772,0.0011065713,0.0006923441,0.0063206474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008983323,0.00020225668,0.0005782078,0.011604531,0.0006527941,0.0006133871,0.0006571872,0.00062028016,0.00043304762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016442372,0.000041173098,0.98512703,0.00002621695,0.00014282696,0.0000989022,0.0015367146,0.0001581567,0.00020035177,0.00028658315,0.0012955893,0.010922022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056578283,0.000014643652,0.9984806,0.00001009664,0.00001894856,0.000017080178,0.0006239515,0.00015870291,0.000024336814,0.000018698089,0.0006219919,0.0000053016224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019864382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015206056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14412683},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2058522712","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065","title":"Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Workflow; Task (project management); Computer science; Peer review; Productivity; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); The Internet; Medical education; Process management; Knowledge management; Psychology; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business; Engineering; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.5988927263084287,"score_gpt":0.5831837063684046,"score_spread":0.01570901994002416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058522712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02701864,0.008398366,0.24357505,0.2777866,0.13413996,0.21695444,0.018844567,0.030717237,0.0425651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046308372,0.004002337,0.649266,0.023582024,0.04396347,0.15563752,0.016560141,0.0053963265,0.05528384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7304347,0.07765243,0.12193183,0.008063132,0.05624567,0.0056722676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10781495,0.16121733,0.079681225,0.036550496,0.58766603,0.027070014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19630228,0.0044332347,0.007634717,0.031311996,0.011280749,0.015001741,0.0070420797,0.014518506,0.05376084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5967355,0.004669861,0.007849941,0.00863768,0.0062013743,0.012293518,0.012671271,0.01434998,0.04418459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008608851,0.0005201131,0.0058738184,0.009854423,0.00046288234,0.0009295986,0.001999706,0.0007728694,0.009437655,0.0039590634,0.80942094,0.15590803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022298717,0.0008417254,0.019552037,0.011096353,0.0008148935,0.001328335,0.0040262537,0.006063981,0.0073991595,0.012566832,0.93286544,0.0012150757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021901503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060217264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8036977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058967203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058941387","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.191","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Global recession; Public relations; Looming; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.481080741475642,"score_gpt":0.5300071964514028,"score_spread":0.048926454975760814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058941387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56574774,0.01594825,0.0034200586,0.22610797,0.0056583127,0.00006987384,0.0018785145,0.00076244643,0.1804069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402007,0.0100682685,0.0013810177,0.013414184,0.0013383381,0.000029077815,0.00091798254,0.00011200095,0.032538313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.000114528215,0.00004096923,0.00009042913,0.0002935131,0.00023130635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844426,0.00020111598,0.00030220553,0.00010256669,0.00041804908,0.000531812],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012479911,0.00032094234,0.0004745561,0.0014259476,0.0028973706,0.0075749005,0.000406651,0.0029263827,0.012301424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061461404,0.00018424356,0.00020016954,0.0027322099,0.0020679424,0.003913232,0.002502593,0.0029663863,0.0034348199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014143588,0.00019413469,0.06681703,0.0006437484,0.00012912544,0.008130152,0.009867609,0.0027220172,0.0036628484,0.12947892,0.4915294,0.28541064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010466218,0.00034993552,0.107031666,0.00065004104,0.00007177209,0.0014376633,0.048060615,0.0039231605,0.0013096628,0.12513122,0.7117677,0.00016185369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018426634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02163248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024108284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041152358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059132269","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0030","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Hegemony; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059132269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24605536,0.0271281,0.07974925,0.06523534,0.004033994,0.0013172198,0.00036145712,0.0022163587,0.57390285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7718662,0.020621419,0.1280112,0.0036059832,0.004664175,0.00036865167,0.0004208039,0.0011357307,0.06930589],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96212786,0.013813146,0.0021404412,0.0014654236,0.018554075,0.0018990876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8968458,0.058265664,0.012222992,0.008160462,0.013539047,0.010966011],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026381724,0.0009513643,0.0011055272,0.0073721944,0.00430232,0.0352124,0.0031666653,0.002013036,0.0101595735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.139361,0.0006073577,0.00054405973,0.012714522,0.0037466625,0.016588999,0.011183794,0.0019079736,0.006277382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015516626,0.0002625756,0.014940413,0.0012324048,0.00011530185,0.0006426079,0.012817225,0.0012983724,0.0020241055,0.055591557,0.04886238,0.8620579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018820852,0.000568981,0.055943962,0.0020432414,0.00024169378,0.0031022292,0.037766505,0.004075964,0.0051857396,0.23078157,0.6598084,0.0002934802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007793843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022109572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027699894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010141367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13952154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059295110","doi":"10.1087/20110208","title":"Casting a wide net: the Journal Impact Factor numerator","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Computer science; Citation; Search engine indexing; Order (exchange); Information retrieval; Factor (programming language); Library science; Operations research; Data science; Mathematics; Political science; Economics; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.7798100006849009,"score_gpt":0.5630907595030051,"score_spread":0.21671924118189578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059295110","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061795313,0.003391569,0.7811703,0.008885305,0.0021556697,0.00016572516,0.00094733253,0.0021209342,0.1393678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58096313,0.002173977,0.38771257,0.0009348696,0.0022457303,0.0003692405,0.00059469,0.0010409589,0.023964895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017113,0.0032968197,0.0005629304,0.001245736,0.004441639,0.00028172773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521069,0.030806446,0.003574226,0.0045933467,0.0075272243,0.0013919226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150761325,0.0009602248,0.0013247132,0.0116713075,0.0020890445,0.01109577,0.0011831715,0.0016259915,0.010674298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10085238,0.0006516982,0.0006423802,0.008761752,0.0041332752,0.011995036,0.004531169,0.00236616,0.0034154332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112070586,0.000081428116,0.009840341,0.0002464601,0.00007859677,0.0001399036,0.0008851102,0.012026092,0.001782442,0.6609802,0.01575763,0.2980697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002969774,0.00007713608,0.0055365553,0.00030949886,0.00006764588,0.00028766954,0.0004308826,0.0864305,0.0030833003,0.85351104,0.0501276,0.00010855338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014141088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015723282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002416943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021071194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07973117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059600429","doi":"10.1177/016224390202700101","title":"Outline for a History of Science Measurement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Statistics; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.7704066506741,"score_gpt":0.5689810652915762,"score_spread":0.20142558538252375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059600429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018960134,0.14405593,0.14761625,0.22451551,0.029777147,0.0021380465,0.0058844467,0.0017331468,0.44238347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051201742,0.22446501,0.2864253,0.080747135,0.030192895,0.0072746156,0.0071740765,0.0018340823,0.3106851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99060553,0.0038213027,0.0012801794,0.0011226672,0.002758167,0.00041204825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824885,0.009984554,0.0010867467,0.0019632524,0.003801758,0.0006750882],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014270338,0.0012336245,0.0010440428,0.00874748,0.004096066,0.010112812,0.0028314025,0.0058891675,0.06688328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030072717,0.0008801717,0.0014368226,0.011712483,0.0061357305,0.015901586,0.005719013,0.008789655,0.047442272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027074613,0.00006964409,0.0005667246,0.00070375943,0.000013606662,0.00012594245,0.00089198095,0.00024218523,0.00015493078,0.6593023,0.19392076,0.14398122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051793527,0.000021766933,0.00047046717,0.0008466887,0.0000038810617,0.00013136998,0.00029741842,0.00013053113,0.00007829474,0.10046128,0.89753395,0.000019214509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002866116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028254932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059542153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066199163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22374684},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059619485","doi":"10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z","title":"Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Philosophy of science; Process (computing); Peer review; Cover (algebra); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.8245981317172449,"score_gpt":0.5811456072251607,"score_spread":0.2434525244920842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059619485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104479045,0.0337989,0.04162762,0.6909548,0.00857035,0.00031515583,0.00044017515,0.00010546507,0.11970853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380648,0.004645974,0.009876183,0.031994067,0.008566579,0.00029143298,0.00014964206,0.000056553305,0.006354716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88650614,0.060670774,0.015205069,0.008968806,0.022201015,0.0064481273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44671884,0.42899936,0.057504945,0.014549615,0.03579681,0.016430378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093051925,0.00042348553,0.0011108948,0.0044503356,0.0043592104,0.012368374,0.004090814,0.016313318,0.008333681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36797994,0.00073911075,0.00076567347,0.006626272,0.01609708,0.00703682,0.0066692284,0.008040407,0.0008830206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014822563,0.0001678523,0.06304728,0.00110298,0.00024088117,0.002833318,0.010951646,0.00040064895,0.0004826276,0.7782592,0.036083367,0.10628204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014581654,0.00014093789,0.026317362,0.0033225375,0.0002246488,0.0105042895,0.015567691,0.0034849795,0.0010317772,0.8088237,0.13017575,0.00026049628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014932624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021413218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005383421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006657065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4921115},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2060388267","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.050125","title":"Providing open access to research, one article at a time","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Public access; Work (physics); Internet privacy","score_opus":0.6977801535377096,"score_gpt":0.6367479066123305,"score_spread":0.06103224692537912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060388267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002022066,0.005749611,0.012447624,0.15730582,0.03206994,0.0005507902,0.009684156,0.012936039,0.767234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028446328,0.011324026,0.04222434,0.044807907,0.019398192,0.0010492546,0.008860721,0.0038469033,0.8400424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98481965,0.0033504525,0.0009673319,0.0015592008,0.007925588,0.0013777862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8992685,0.019027065,0.0061580827,0.020625057,0.027049104,0.027872154],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01805947,0.00082834467,0.0018604995,0.0052585294,0.0028862252,0.011198716,0.0024105338,0.006443043,0.48143688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058176894,0.0014098623,0.0012717552,0.0098021645,0.0051548677,0.014764785,0.014065881,0.004019144,0.3670296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005766118,0.000030265282,0.00045361792,0.00037074607,0.000020846006,0.00007689855,0.00024014953,0.00003482304,0.0012835347,0.020046739,0.88803256,0.08935213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028123462,0.000011850875,0.0009832905,0.000074346455,0.0000069249195,0.00008950635,0.000112115675,0.000020219282,0.00014305965,0.0033572293,0.99515414,0.000019252386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057229702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019437844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021739244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017672181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73966736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060460295","doi":"10.1002/asi.10131","title":"A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in <i>JASIST</i> and the <i>Journal of Documentation</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Distribution (mathematics); Period (music); Geography; Library science; Regional science; Demography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22292296724816335,"score_gpt":0.5036120534564672,"score_spread":0.28068908620830385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060460295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99078965,0.0015392799,0.00016896205,0.00021857288,0.00003394302,0.000007750862,0.0015908576,0.00002843615,0.0056225965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970155,0.00064962433,0.00020133925,0.000023506043,0.000031499774,0.000008939561,0.0011082946,0.000010012932,0.0009513436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982724,0.0002547442,0.00032115646,0.00027550355,0.0006135335,0.00026258515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700113,0.006786474,0.0103227515,0.0011312278,0.009526703,0.0022215436],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017247414,0.00014966363,0.00038162028,0.01905384,0.0008749186,0.0025545608,0.00031877842,0.00020801972,0.0030972725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01581293,0.000106553875,0.00021180256,0.022818856,0.00054388784,0.001277829,0.0013402164,0.0002399411,0.0006506544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017295874,0.000028408545,0.9575623,0.00011968865,0.00005858151,0.0002683619,0.0023049798,0.0001458296,0.00085485226,0.00074758945,0.001624942,0.036111563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077468485,0.000048051235,0.9872799,0.000053072956,0.000028251556,0.0005136321,0.0043365825,0.00022695427,0.0007724838,0.00021548978,0.0065058754,0.000012013715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007299014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100097945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010311813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012703653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014513016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063748664","doi":"10.3152/095820210x12827366906562","title":"Evaluation of RT&amp;D: from 'prescriptions for justifying' to 'user-oriented guidance for learning'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Subject (documents); Frame (networking); Work (physics); Production (economics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Library science; Telecommunications; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.9214874769191007,"score_gpt":0.7382062644885964,"score_spread":0.18328121243050433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063748664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118334465,0.027026623,0.24627501,0.32239625,0.0016811233,0.0036609387,0.0011618877,0.0013408901,0.2781228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203397,0.0045584245,0.16255553,0.005692827,0.00032969966,0.0017979998,0.00026501852,0.00021503771,0.004245838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.47436956,0.37817487,0.03048279,0.0060720043,0.10695764,0.0039431844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4523169,0.39505088,0.035114076,0.028436,0.08174311,0.0073390333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36214676,0.00117152,0.0017777068,0.01830467,0.0069327727,0.03985049,0.004468919,0.004724377,0.0028228785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5091429,0.00071848114,0.00084637094,0.017069206,0.03718198,0.020024097,0.011912523,0.0049281195,0.00089352095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019068453,0.00018712344,0.015009922,0.0033434308,0.00013593756,0.00013905682,0.034993455,0.001817413,0.0007204956,0.50490975,0.021642601,0.41691008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002479373,0.0008206872,0.030051023,0.012341778,0.00019872852,0.00036117557,0.07678827,0.010426641,0.006873582,0.56707466,0.29419526,0.0006203131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015683733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143170245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63785326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035289686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046472058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78658664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064104126","doi":"10.1108/07378831011076675","title":"International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998‐2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Library science; Citation; Subject (documents); Visibility; Science Citation Index; Value (mathematics); Political science; Country of origin; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Law; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.34286646410962296,"score_gpt":0.5211498867667314,"score_spread":0.1782834226571084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064104126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96512467,0.017044384,0.00040197073,0.0036748005,0.00019607253,0.00009235791,0.0011887123,0.00004166897,0.0122353425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991375,0.005657577,0.0007861643,0.00028598754,0.00014002016,0.00006752541,0.0004950052,0.0000069491953,0.0011857585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118316,0.00244772,0.0013461672,0.00095959275,0.003236761,0.00082660635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94480073,0.011729047,0.02397747,0.0016732765,0.013482655,0.004336719],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011331738,0.00028451794,0.0005285431,0.0061683636,0.0013304296,0.0034971137,0.0007058097,0.0006578235,0.0016299528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035811502,0.00015295447,0.00040019065,0.012243241,0.00062598946,0.0022734087,0.0019428512,0.0005414883,0.00038007888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030696535,0.00009824356,0.8123796,0.0014207299,0.0001941388,0.00077976455,0.035241097,0.00022726452,0.0007231598,0.001312315,0.0064813215,0.14083536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023809014,0.00020686255,0.8703606,0.0005928529,0.0001318389,0.0015950318,0.07798362,0.00030529095,0.0012926665,0.00033916606,0.04712023,0.000047957255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045557464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00508271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99383163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022523263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068843546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059928656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065018034","doi":"10.1186/1471-2474-11-4","title":"Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Medicine; Ranking (information retrieval); Significant difference; Demography; Internal medicine; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.2645278143175414,"score_gpt":0.5116751969004314,"score_spread":0.24714738258288999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065018034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909264,0.0048269806,0.00048854935,0.00014834042,0.000036653117,0.000058787075,0.0020366844,0.000050888397,0.0014267317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704486,0.00052931136,0.0006385941,0.00001757034,0.000073468254,0.00003509294,0.0012164778,0.000009069416,0.00043544904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528754,0.0011208437,0.00083187013,0.00056917034,0.0019553658,0.000235264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95319027,0.019150183,0.018279895,0.0014516826,0.006324854,0.0016032034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053232955,0.00035122156,0.0010656178,0.022307511,0.00035630952,0.001139184,0.0006383072,0.00034271565,0.0027420148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03165678,0.00012453919,0.0014492549,0.01636838,0.00044445216,0.00081952434,0.00087214645,0.0003801722,0.0004774425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068395684,0.000047060075,0.979731,0.00040275924,0.00079257344,0.000056557194,0.0001733863,0.0002432874,0.0003835999,0.00014240474,0.00050479406,0.016838508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030922,0.00034970551,0.99586606,0.000066096596,0.00035793317,0.00036147726,0.00033868852,0.00091935054,0.00045903504,0.00023466667,0.0010005081,0.000015536507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030572615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028116864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013202268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012373374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028152585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065217297","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-005","title":"The Current State of Open Access in Journals Sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Association (psychology); Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.4486040440155202,"score_gpt":0.5848375414099297,"score_spread":0.13623349739440954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065217297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867999,0.046606664,0.0030156854,0.005687338,0.0007279205,0.00013768557,0.0044589643,0.00026292054,0.052302867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769121,0.012826235,0.002017597,0.00033503503,0.00073779695,0.00005023065,0.0021523691,0.00004567372,0.004922966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979294,0.0014496541,0.0017733083,0.0009426226,0.005065463,0.000976084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891265,0.029628685,0.027238159,0.006324229,0.029958675,0.015585297],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010096256,0.00032786425,0.00087696715,0.022166599,0.0022143333,0.010513687,0.0014116135,0.0009030488,0.0062128752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040952884,0.00027404234,0.000669523,0.042569492,0.002660776,0.008278215,0.0028147656,0.00073436217,0.0010469676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005042806,0.00021007787,0.5610137,0.0029613015,0.00033784247,0.0009382392,0.008593025,0.0005603802,0.0055467146,0.025301708,0.010294501,0.38373822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004650061,0.00029109124,0.8824452,0.00066244154,0.00029622277,0.0010768173,0.0077398205,0.002048651,0.0022477738,0.012457882,0.09051928,0.00016832132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006831942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00785146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032228152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009686949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053394735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065998304","doi":"10.1002/meet.2009.1450460279","title":"Mapping library and information science: Does field delineation matter?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Data science; Set (abstract data type); Citation analysis; Interdisciplinarity; Citation; Information science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Management science; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.072682282443809,"score_gpt":0.41481612185934963,"score_spread":0.34213383941554065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065998304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8952356,0.005153813,0.048298385,0.014389789,0.00017673303,0.00041779297,0.00085414964,0.00031533782,0.035158355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895511,0.0003844271,0.009163592,0.00022863082,0.0000700043,0.000110065346,0.00017536254,0.000039051356,0.00027782194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91936034,0.05857394,0.004179723,0.0043788394,0.011687489,0.0018197872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46787122,0.41044292,0.06687856,0.027459627,0.023241468,0.0041062864],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08165907,0.00050179806,0.0015121397,0.016268408,0.0042114523,0.012007361,0.0024579593,0.0019229815,0.004800894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32159984,0.00065118197,0.0009989139,0.035619505,0.008767183,0.01968324,0.00773189,0.0017863731,0.000686591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011912395,0.00042843493,0.54322386,0.0023767794,0.0008185184,0.000245983,0.018577011,0.00968053,0.0021836245,0.12538002,0.00623994,0.28965417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032896092,0.0005498317,0.6786811,0.0020393347,0.000574398,0.00040049796,0.046191055,0.02567508,0.005672709,0.20846331,0.031221736,0.00020203282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005407864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041151983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98373157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045569614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00468751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4318596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066797667","doi":"10.1087/095315103321505557","title":"An international peer‐review system for a Chinese scientific journal","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Czech; Political science; Peer review; Library science; World class; Geography; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.5798840455484582,"score_gpt":0.5923638638770029,"score_spread":0.012479818328544723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066797667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5179418,0.0047769207,0.23897775,0.024899438,0.008932151,0.010250846,0.0013094492,0.007095009,0.18581663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83241135,0.0008970955,0.121355586,0.0009820814,0.0027657782,0.003331301,0.0011658268,0.00047691682,0.03661403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92226195,0.027433543,0.014092665,0.0053274455,0.027232423,0.0036519824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7161424,0.054823328,0.036427345,0.038465362,0.13274375,0.02139778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08316318,0.00072494143,0.0008512942,0.0125686,0.009306007,0.01211065,0.0027957004,0.0015649602,0.008047716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14646982,0.00055087695,0.0006937291,0.010776649,0.0029922442,0.007016169,0.0071123685,0.002194997,0.0032405327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012242072,0.00067546696,0.05571713,0.0019266886,0.00023757522,0.0031618928,0.020333467,0.0077325217,0.028447554,0.11425762,0.11605562,0.6502303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057375274,0.0016613854,0.10794559,0.0009147747,0.0005504348,0.0026707887,0.008017637,0.043578655,0.02280455,0.03648003,0.77398527,0.00081717124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047796024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004504151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073517435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024982614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067019328","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0016","title":"Scientometric Analysis of Nuclear Science and Technology Research Output in Iran","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Productivity; Discipline; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Library science; Citation impact; Nuclear science; Work (physics); Social science; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.6918588627989544,"score_gpt":0.5879321123082115,"score_spread":0.10392675049074285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067019328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97422874,0.0028468648,0.0009967004,0.00049812923,0.00004204864,0.0000616872,0.0033364864,0.000056481596,0.017932799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944723,0.0012306558,0.00070191943,0.000020256422,0.000081740494,0.000051200168,0.0026800388,0.000009236544,0.0007524161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428225,0.0009092223,0.000715421,0.00028121783,0.0034813292,0.00033057883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98813397,0.0041980147,0.0032868306,0.00048033881,0.0035116293,0.00038932537],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004516183,0.0003982307,0.0007483955,0.034536146,0.0005192306,0.0024005293,0.00060394534,0.00031851747,0.0016942273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024369463,0.00010179132,0.000758322,0.056998923,0.0004989706,0.0014617752,0.0009880178,0.0002935035,0.00048677507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013086076,0.00014122596,0.85614765,0.0006441789,0.00030008995,0.0002384269,0.0020859307,0.0032817516,0.0005817013,0.0027873733,0.003287727,0.13037317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007413234,0.0000643994,0.9884908,0.0000668043,0.00008057529,0.00019378067,0.0027092174,0.0022151745,0.00047503828,0.00068489654,0.0049946317,0.000017288125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008905498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055875215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023934462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029339488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023884177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067764901","doi":"10.1186/1472-6920-10-21","title":"Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Promotion (chess); Medicine; Relation (database); Medical journal; Medical education; Psychology; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.37716673005725343,"score_gpt":0.6209975455706522,"score_spread":0.2438308155133988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067764901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8389384,0.032773927,0.0077386033,0.06118154,0.006334565,0.0003533379,0.0016705758,0.00013779904,0.050871175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98053956,0.0083056195,0.0030460327,0.0021798813,0.0025906763,0.0001708329,0.00046640067,0.000033519125,0.0026675845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9060791,0.039659355,0.016281806,0.0026312885,0.03268838,0.0026600985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38774994,0.27466375,0.18563662,0.011105259,0.12364166,0.017202696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0657529,0.00039055993,0.00062442804,0.0046721157,0.0013488323,0.0056904107,0.0011933118,0.0012889998,0.0051131425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33562556,0.00027425666,0.00074416795,0.006305586,0.0018270565,0.0022943497,0.002116385,0.0016532999,0.0013124751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056884595,0.00017716264,0.754676,0.0028592164,0.00036196984,0.0005962845,0.011655883,0.00072781177,0.0012647237,0.002549752,0.024388272,0.200174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009838719,0.0008723013,0.8513161,0.0043485654,0.00037556392,0.002379545,0.021770468,0.0025447467,0.0037011812,0.0060564326,0.106328934,0.00020774906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014481926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012318516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025109393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055901236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34773874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203480","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0084","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations: Report on a Study Funded by a Planning Grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Library science; Business model; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.31479195236960955,"score_gpt":0.4687641151888939,"score_spread":0.15397216281928433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6611514,0.01881942,0.001130395,0.18078671,0.0007424778,0.00032136182,0.0023375747,0.00013922658,0.13457148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96699786,0.013291858,0.0021125362,0.0020664618,0.0009371547,0.00018295366,0.0007383397,0.00004158077,0.013631146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878078,0.0036233487,0.0008517323,0.00061970396,0.005337469,0.0017598612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8734885,0.04112184,0.031555064,0.003835853,0.02796844,0.022030279],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02120338,0.00024258485,0.00039507545,0.0058303066,0.00571174,0.018520985,0.0011541855,0.0016210466,0.0063116425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057272345,0.00049663085,0.0005073676,0.0133280195,0.0024737467,0.016674342,0.0030682613,0.0022661607,0.0016674339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054311403,0.0011477533,0.5915833,0.00071424904,0.00008620226,0.0014129931,0.02384529,0.00073377223,0.0009167388,0.06705948,0.06140394,0.25055316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007449874,0.0004946142,0.68015337,0.0006045034,0.000096496464,0.0015617877,0.07375492,0.0016742573,0.0011263471,0.012850429,0.22747529,0.00013353073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011182528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015982518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008825497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023283709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11213553},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2068604254","doi":"10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.006","title":"How well are journal and clinical article characteristics associated with the journal impact factor? a retrospective cohort study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Regression analysis; Retrospective cohort study; MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.22445102465389735,"score_gpt":0.4931338155212634,"score_spread":0.268682790867366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068604254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99778926,0.00059655565,0.00022093281,0.00011937098,0.000023356873,0.00003241658,0.00081413565,0.00000763863,0.00039628168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854445,0.00018830037,0.00017433897,0.000044341497,0.000048652862,0.000035524317,0.00069685926,0.0000064202454,0.00026103854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670815,0.0006964008,0.00066619687,0.0007833882,0.0008260033,0.00031984632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686271,0.008818633,0.014118205,0.003445283,0.0030525103,0.0019382148],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066451873,0.0003442954,0.0007184066,0.0037530882,0.0007418455,0.0016155043,0.00063216913,0.001040596,0.0020558634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031873435,0.00047313963,0.0010421884,0.0036937848,0.0006935113,0.0023689792,0.00075001694,0.0008381535,0.00077383645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016844094,0.000047255857,0.9983358,0.00001159844,0.00008560654,0.00006552436,0.00009032432,0.000017311482,0.00008898963,0.000016717117,0.000109685774,0.00096284534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016529724,0.0003132897,0.9983192,0.00001128659,0.00007176195,0.00043751657,0.00020910015,0.00014933085,0.00008564153,0.00005187179,0.00032338165,0.000011042709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019868494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001318965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99624693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004273888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071208423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035143554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068723985","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.15","title":"The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology's unique response to a crisis.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Experimental psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.5717731182688975,"score_gpt":0.6444924579416753,"score_spread":0.07271933967277777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068723985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4463189,0.05373743,0.010555199,0.44206604,0.0041727605,0.00014090294,0.0017315408,0.00059028313,0.04068706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370268,0.016743246,0.008183022,0.026263695,0.0053711017,0.000094696145,0.0006770646,0.00018975523,0.0054506604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97808105,0.005773997,0.0019566244,0.0015030236,0.012015924,0.00066937937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69345737,0.2091354,0.050828688,0.009465204,0.027676588,0.009436744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019044898,0.00037859476,0.0010320928,0.015798524,0.003932573,0.014579764,0.0013512342,0.00471317,0.0029485335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1721007,0.00072585605,0.00050730037,0.021421522,0.0067688087,0.016427169,0.0070191463,0.0039141187,0.000813172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063090073,0.00037671917,0.20737588,0.0016750406,0.00037418524,0.0020284196,0.036693376,0.0013675964,0.003401645,0.058837973,0.122070424,0.56516784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012768911,0.00035546202,0.4050264,0.001744348,0.00030515084,0.0038001058,0.06645233,0.0060388674,0.0033507072,0.28379405,0.2286571,0.00034781286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033423526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059129354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041455626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004070946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10072023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069122309","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.004","title":"Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Università Bocconi; European Commission","keywords":"Position (finance); Social connectedness; Exploratory analysis; Process (computing); Network science; Order (exchange); Data science; Sociology; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Complex network; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6759460167148517,"score_gpt":0.6428787603658095,"score_spread":0.03306725634904217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069122309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96755564,0.0012278749,0.011184167,0.0015936517,0.000014627837,0.00008114158,0.0018573184,0.000039191695,0.016446356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813754,0.0008411568,0.008668413,0.00005224139,0.000026550222,0.00012813204,0.0010841037,0.000019730618,0.0010421071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953198,0.0024827537,0.00033249537,0.0004283248,0.0011995437,0.00023711122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85896295,0.1254148,0.008909154,0.0023218764,0.0032788652,0.001112318],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054482566,0.00023607998,0.0004021249,0.01649461,0.001659571,0.004150272,0.0008105093,0.0010279611,0.002746927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064592384,0.00034116948,0.00039600363,0.02680017,0.0013422244,0.007564329,0.0023030436,0.00087085436,0.00037385034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005388163,0.00027417537,0.696687,0.0010864912,0.0004990565,0.0007307788,0.034537166,0.010127931,0.006902224,0.102659024,0.0029478571,0.14300956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091843496,0.0002236106,0.67946357,0.0006402761,0.0007674405,0.001190079,0.048178144,0.06460903,0.006052651,0.14128171,0.05737883,0.00012283844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005594818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074456907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98350537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016300054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019447875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028813481},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2071194841","doi":"10.3152/147154302781781119","title":"Evaluation of governments’ scientific output: a bibliometric profile of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Political science; Public administration; Quality (philosophy); Discipline; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6015190994652441,"score_gpt":0.5307854672138773,"score_spread":0.07073363225136675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071194841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84774345,0.015583411,0.0005550992,0.008269102,0.0000726269,0.000101148464,0.029699655,0.00019727774,0.0977782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795039,0.0069123153,0.0004978222,0.00019279821,0.000046662994,0.000028783654,0.008587003,0.000041447434,0.0041891537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98520505,0.0008499856,0.0007926221,0.000608125,0.01124218,0.0013020956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95555496,0.0048446916,0.0066873194,0.00085467496,0.029639136,0.002419039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045879562,0.00031936736,0.00078116916,0.046246145,0.0041681263,0.006793853,0.0009015111,0.0005374913,0.0022526488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029372735,0.000173091,0.00047781557,0.13789742,0.0014049379,0.0012719793,0.0020730786,0.00043361846,0.000420578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028249208,0.000069131995,0.8466856,0.00085009617,0.00031552103,0.00029560935,0.007987049,0.0014308312,0.0009463199,0.009480483,0.024434999,0.10722178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008144222,0.000019719368,0.9610569,0.00012590732,0.000055603025,0.00009705009,0.0034214128,0.000862195,0.00033819096,0.00032446027,0.03365096,0.000039499882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95291436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95800424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99541205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0569552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0773485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41324085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071195592","doi":"10.1002/asi.22731","title":"The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Reputation; Relation (database); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Library science; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Law; Data mining; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33611615055197325,"score_gpt":0.5278257961980538,"score_spread":0.19170964564608056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071195592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8482983,0.03263817,0.00479443,0.015120445,0.0009460508,0.000047711175,0.0031632965,0.0002331758,0.09475839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986561,0.0051627895,0.00076175516,0.0005814653,0.00081901596,0.000013941552,0.00089613436,0.000035742585,0.005168115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966462,0.0005945281,0.00049366103,0.00056568295,0.0012499711,0.00044986105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.920817,0.03661815,0.023615297,0.0037308433,0.009991361,0.0052273553],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004629276,0.0003060834,0.00067538215,0.009060747,0.0010460619,0.004451658,0.0006045961,0.0012291488,0.011028268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484847,0.00016052117,0.00057883526,0.015810948,0.0015583712,0.006140242,0.0024638881,0.0016536864,0.0030711386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005948376,0.00018279781,0.83930254,0.0007866483,0.0005107542,0.00041596952,0.0022297457,0.0011985435,0.001193255,0.022991156,0.009120277,0.121473506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044298824,0.0002879693,0.9368981,0.00019896572,0.0003430323,0.0008136977,0.0019480187,0.00096092175,0.0013082825,0.027079139,0.030047687,0.000069859394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003942286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032316644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99537075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014114851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03689319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071280619","doi":"10.5860/crl-356","title":"Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities? Findings from a 2011 Survey of Academic Publishers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Open access publishing; Library science; Electronic publishing; Higher education; Sociology; Graduate students; Polling; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Political science; Media studies; Humanities; Social science; Pedagogy; Art; World Wide Web; The Internet; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.8969688631947594,"score_gpt":0.6308111758037704,"score_spread":0.266157687390989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071280619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847497,0.0009676788,0.00012833012,0.005554393,0.000041903088,0.000026085872,0.00012529509,0.000010153457,0.008396443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685764,0.0008462023,0.00013597205,0.001009222,0.00011252941,0.000016882494,0.000062881445,0.000007925701,0.00095083937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786179,0.009183869,0.0024492873,0.00094713987,0.0074746404,0.001327172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7396009,0.13780394,0.09243533,0.0049246494,0.011217117,0.014018128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020513766,0.00010879468,0.00038374495,0.0033531187,0.0014716877,0.005422832,0.0008380477,0.0010008762,0.005803765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14522238,0.00035174348,0.00022957762,0.006112176,0.001889867,0.0047023227,0.0022599504,0.0010408013,0.00094151107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026144067,0.00053956016,0.8984078,0.0003167067,0.000086301676,0.00033730426,0.021642532,0.00005603768,0.0005545191,0.0019700779,0.004907231,0.07092037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036673824,0.00018202215,0.9399996,0.00012428006,0.00003425566,0.00025012085,0.043539915,0.0001463408,0.00040025252,0.00079074595,0.014475858,0.000019971949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024391483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005494702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99916196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013175744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020416249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10848844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072344898","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0012133","title":"A Method for the Automated, Reliable Retrieval of Publication-Citation Records","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Vocabulary; Raw data; Search engine; Data mining; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6013699902379935,"score_gpt":0.5521463994613379,"score_spread":0.04922359077665561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072344898","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026660569,0.000434843,0.976997,0.00024427773,0.00017563633,0.00046703976,0.0030897174,0.0146536045,0.0012716529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014456691,0.00019532423,0.9791707,0.000069858004,0.00012492765,0.00075167377,0.0029485896,0.0006044838,0.00167777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98279804,0.003645926,0.002567879,0.003052427,0.007534733,0.000401044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422155,0.024465054,0.006194017,0.009972522,0.01651601,0.00063689274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012209144,0.0023323216,0.0017229632,0.024505334,0.0019257263,0.0054911026,0.003026013,0.0022707311,0.0072602993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07383495,0.0012824605,0.00209316,0.018142706,0.0010566622,0.004468316,0.0027736693,0.0020518622,0.012879288],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027345246,0.00017279654,0.008067075,0.0011186687,0.00032938173,0.00030796474,0.00050867104,0.0054996684,0.014821062,0.013107319,0.043846034,0.91194797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043983027,0.00035908716,0.023250401,0.00066438457,0.0005350886,0.0035581263,0.00061214966,0.55538607,0.07935464,0.058136147,0.27699935,0.00070470286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004798058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055842637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016024177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006064143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073023209","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0064841","title":"Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":913,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Joint Information Systems Committee; Arts and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Social media; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Mainstream; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6312407472470482,"score_gpt":0.49593579515051267,"score_spread":0.13530495209653548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073023209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.734418,0.036999546,0.014297406,0.05066571,0.0019628545,0.00029663247,0.01013212,0.0021523682,0.14907534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743192,0.005862253,0.009285649,0.0013892807,0.0010983635,0.0001158385,0.0024835316,0.00024231368,0.005203586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886687,0.0049385373,0.0009400161,0.0009697906,0.0036518928,0.00063299446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91966563,0.043619964,0.019367816,0.0037481398,0.010328156,0.003270277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015020489,0.001019095,0.000793184,0.012301053,0.0011972237,0.0067582247,0.0010554875,0.0011773154,0.009162871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077773936,0.0003675314,0.0013552326,0.018868849,0.0017303481,0.012542558,0.0031624069,0.0011338585,0.0037796844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071342365,0.00015498535,0.5477033,0.0013728172,0.00071374344,0.00019966229,0.00358075,0.0008852009,0.0005302147,0.015191238,0.016458476,0.41249615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000843557,0.000819428,0.787873,0.0022327567,0.00082081015,0.00087857456,0.014182835,0.01298265,0.0020888504,0.03364098,0.14408958,0.00030613967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004721929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005230342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016812211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014725464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0794369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074440227","doi":"10.1177/0961000614537514","title":"Highly cited articles in the Information Science and Library Science category in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation; Index (typography); Citation index; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.21762042173316584,"score_gpt":0.44022398578710153,"score_spread":0.2226035640539357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074440227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649544,0.0061880285,0.003080061,0.00036489996,0.0001242777,0.00029956372,0.011231138,0.00015408016,0.013603586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98131114,0.0029352983,0.005241303,0.00004858101,0.00026141555,0.0003189442,0.007761858,0.000050254428,0.0020711436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996615,0.0011201091,0.0017887297,0.00052130764,0.006195152,0.0004086035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95219094,0.022561044,0.010500273,0.0014412267,0.012070276,0.0012362774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058715977,0.00043834466,0.0012398657,0.09597973,0.0014840284,0.0042840033,0.0006215394,0.000722688,0.00205044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03521932,0.00019637952,0.001145677,0.10083597,0.0007083518,0.0026327432,0.001963848,0.0004213845,0.0011910547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021218101,0.00019037639,0.8901091,0.0018625521,0.0007306097,0.0003492828,0.0021973357,0.00086794037,0.0030941672,0.0015052167,0.0033448443,0.09553645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011185406,0.000111532965,0.9828775,0.00019091206,0.0003346656,0.0005993824,0.0021261596,0.0019987207,0.0017880332,0.0009411003,0.0089769205,0.00004392514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035806564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006594712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001504064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025354163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031052351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074541943","doi":"10.3129/i10-003","title":"Assessing payback from research investment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.8052335153994701,"score_gpt":0.6232428460621985,"score_spread":0.1819906693372716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074541943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38387161,0.008001975,0.0030788567,0.53852683,0.004772061,0.00012582193,0.0011635827,0.00013950627,0.060319874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694141,0.0022699188,0.0014915339,0.019618085,0.0027226028,0.00005331932,0.0003169408,0.000022327904,0.004091153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885434,0.004354473,0.0016256619,0.0004626524,0.003927658,0.0010862859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81971127,0.12986875,0.0127625745,0.0039828634,0.023357779,0.010316875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017726915,0.00026185383,0.0009040569,0.003426175,0.00082298846,0.0051541533,0.0009955732,0.005087577,0.0056302384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1991213,0.00020703017,0.0006715261,0.0039133825,0.0010347817,0.002845854,0.0015027606,0.0046937945,0.0012716982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002051978,0.00067760004,0.41028097,0.00044578552,0.0004107368,0.002290031,0.0010064251,0.0028355734,0.00062108156,0.03615231,0.14393589,0.39929172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498085,0.002204942,0.5452137,0.0016914044,0.00070572674,0.010437709,0.009173625,0.03351272,0.0029445437,0.199229,0.1940548,0.0003337679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058097076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012008436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054377685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005850579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075407325","doi":"10.1590/s0102-76382009000400004","title":"Fator de impacto: importância e influência no meio editorial, acadêmico e científico","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medicine; Criticism; Scientific evidence; Scientific literature; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16840489526489644,"score_gpt":0.44037245006716036,"score_spread":0.2719675548022639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075407325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32756862,0.13815163,0.025107212,0.054848626,0.009201309,0.0005546198,0.0068073664,0.0016638634,0.43609676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94171005,0.027180988,0.008648311,0.0012320804,0.008346971,0.00016852438,0.000938856,0.00032183985,0.011452398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666354,0.007665464,0.0025722827,0.0018647641,0.019818636,0.0014434786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6773309,0.23292798,0.035681237,0.008767971,0.04034817,0.004943728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028455622,0.0011480739,0.0015356183,0.032728028,0.0021135139,0.017347347,0.0011212379,0.0014203909,0.01248807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2101051,0.00044506206,0.0010987965,0.03834302,0.00409368,0.00699754,0.0033638424,0.002161499,0.0034590387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052298984,0.00026661874,0.26723197,0.00622059,0.0006625251,0.00091653044,0.010159595,0.00091590214,0.002481953,0.039853886,0.021328047,0.6494395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112690745,0.0005888372,0.5880054,0.0064671277,0.0018279578,0.005107697,0.017004965,0.0047831377,0.0068076523,0.104499176,0.26443246,0.00036297558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023260997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002421052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036433444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005835201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15048957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075464897","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0859-6","title":"Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Publication; Elite; Productivity; Citation analysis; Library science; Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.26447491485703406,"score_gpt":0.4612345109392629,"score_spread":0.19675959608222882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075464897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899093,0.0005724007,0.00144402,0.00024160238,0.000018341643,0.000022557486,0.0016418693,0.00003695001,0.0061130505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676263,0.00025177395,0.000720033,0.000049857495,0.00009506748,0.000013438851,0.0012035319,0.000014940624,0.0008887996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840087,0.00025888713,0.0002842167,0.00029030148,0.00049673277,0.00026889343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854833,0.0040759644,0.00466306,0.000884048,0.002851322,0.0020423306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034083414,0.00032222387,0.00062183477,0.017258542,0.0010583864,0.00360312,0.0005927111,0.0010835051,0.0055278125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016769757,0.00014718271,0.00053820334,0.018366242,0.0005496798,0.0027296776,0.0017560835,0.00045937838,0.0017012383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035677952,0.00023363788,0.94720197,0.00017833694,0.00048565504,0.0001133129,0.0005911417,0.0006769756,0.005961523,0.0013882255,0.0015435469,0.04126893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027078877,0.00016998108,0.9893036,0.000039856284,0.00019665888,0.00028678248,0.0009898026,0.0030301914,0.0017900984,0.0022097903,0.0019357488,0.000020316453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023596988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002342661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004499309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006471497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0184924},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2076071133","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0822-6","title":"Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Harm; Impact factor; Proxy (statistics); Ecology; Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Set (abstract data type); Biology; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.37632678244284634,"score_gpt":0.5872092963679597,"score_spread":0.21088251392511337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076071133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69838315,0.08865081,0.05496348,0.03298509,0.001250042,0.00056007615,0.0073258975,0.00063559914,0.11524582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848764,0.005577533,0.0060859392,0.00033005315,0.0006620977,0.00014837003,0.00051980535,0.000073375406,0.0017265157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472044,0.0270126,0.0055955234,0.003843263,0.014883037,0.0014610834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3872016,0.5125375,0.059508126,0.016524253,0.02131917,0.0029093644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050210685,0.00087020616,0.0016324106,0.04028644,0.0017086222,0.0085681835,0.0011187968,0.002309961,0.004641141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4177092,0.00036727116,0.0016541468,0.10709347,0.0064114775,0.015343044,0.0022729621,0.002185073,0.0009074407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058490015,0.00024756038,0.57310194,0.004081038,0.0021276437,0.0013607586,0.00845241,0.0068665794,0.0011237405,0.16196375,0.009919231,0.23017041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112843336,0.00061930396,0.6360449,0.0015971464,0.0008068351,0.0024140964,0.0063955565,0.0111967055,0.0015114002,0.29509205,0.04386616,0.0003429485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030084462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028156438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039577563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26554263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076342581","doi":"10.1577/1548-8446-34.12.598","title":"Maintaining the Competitiveness of the American Fisheries Society Journals: An Assessment Based on Influence and Cost-Effectiveness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.3740745069818973,"score_gpt":0.5574868213571416,"score_spread":0.18341231437524425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076342581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653504,0.0042846473,0.0019269957,0.0014409014,0.0001342624,0.00022115934,0.0006164049,0.00008090933,0.025944347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704903,0.0005215481,0.0014325411,0.000097244585,0.00024097458,0.00005959013,0.00024669617,0.000019260993,0.00033318962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93584543,0.015741568,0.008021138,0.0023679165,0.035825375,0.00219849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56593,0.2235237,0.0952177,0.010666713,0.087263815,0.017398063],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0516083,0.00075810053,0.0016522409,0.04152928,0.0026519632,0.013333263,0.0018026943,0.0016750292,0.0027887088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22644004,0.00039347712,0.0012443484,0.03371563,0.0029304803,0.0068195355,0.004649751,0.00077867793,0.00049351866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003672847,0.00022686894,0.94054806,0.0005511583,0.0010252247,0.00026590985,0.001836351,0.0012129745,0.0015285707,0.002770678,0.00094226847,0.04872458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003719998,0.00059713074,0.9819547,0.0001654611,0.0004074745,0.00040348383,0.0033277767,0.004818268,0.0010527789,0.0023421997,0.0048041083,0.00008958371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038285006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005647821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032754645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028162072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27293408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077611838","doi":"10.3171/2009.12.jns091599","title":"Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Neurosurgery; Citation; Subspecialty; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Grading (engineering); Impact factor; MEDLINE; Observational study; Medical physics; Family medicine; Library science; Surgery; Pathology","score_opus":0.5621682540822652,"score_gpt":0.5479679351986918,"score_spread":0.014200318883573426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077611838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25134012,0.657329,0.0017588324,0.0039003175,0.002964105,0.0008223616,0.057036728,0.00043926632,0.02440923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62137485,0.3168117,0.011338004,0.0012125865,0.0040233377,0.0010200258,0.03674293,0.00018865772,0.0072879293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913986,0.0010875746,0.0029817624,0.0006900356,0.0034043526,0.00043763744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468892,0.024813233,0.014856215,0.00095822103,0.010430128,0.002052975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006405141,0.0010074491,0.0017364854,0.11364049,0.0014312099,0.0061072796,0.0010152676,0.000971255,0.007255647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034778576,0.00046130473,0.0013828818,0.13087963,0.00068116107,0.003028019,0.0019730858,0.00046899283,0.0022265934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080011017,0.0002006305,0.33390254,0.065297835,0.003784683,0.0023573155,0.0032856162,0.00041313915,0.0056940964,0.001889396,0.05641976,0.5259549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014140733,0.00041152333,0.7968947,0.019751132,0.0038035035,0.00998936,0.007375488,0.0008596241,0.0032640006,0.0035421285,0.15381438,0.00015268271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019146758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037840675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001733231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027551884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033874035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078299330","doi":"10.5596/c11-021","title":"Open access and health librarians in 2011","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Access to information; Health information; Public relations; Information access; Political science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Health care","score_opus":0.26600464241663163,"score_gpt":0.4912204744430563,"score_spread":0.22521583202642464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078299330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11631239,0.08730643,0.0009683566,0.49336272,0.0032324842,0.00013426995,0.0026727458,0.00014243228,0.29586813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6833099,0.04222828,0.0014223794,0.07405986,0.0029019625,0.000103030674,0.0016946654,0.00014754974,0.1941323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789235,0.0040373025,0.0010607189,0.0012216376,0.010856173,0.0039006376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523934,0.011395676,0.0039175907,0.0014633342,0.01670117,0.014128751],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013016172,0.00024213862,0.000617803,0.0062476443,0.011280956,0.020949423,0.0010169573,0.004277217,0.0114248535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048566792,0.00038911722,0.00041255006,0.019454326,0.0069146417,0.0102466,0.0077523743,0.004249185,0.0011401637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002797113,0.00017727306,0.047346696,0.0006415625,0.000055428303,0.00038799047,0.042791937,0.00014014884,0.0002126439,0.29328567,0.3108547,0.3038263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016665786,0.000029531111,0.050453298,0.00046514664,0.000021888805,0.00014795523,0.022198122,0.00009111034,0.00018218879,0.0070254775,0.9193114,0.00005730682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6705282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8044465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07202802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099873595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6628243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079772095","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-001","title":"Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Publishing; Peer review; Technical peer review; Open peer review; Computer science; Publication; Implementation; Review article; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6022083722763935,"score_gpt":0.58024556048121,"score_spread":0.021962811795183446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079772095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005457827,0.96858716,0.005813709,0.018235773,0.004385683,0.00013974706,0.000029475845,0.000037475067,0.002225255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007931722,0.97679406,0.00815589,0.0028270613,0.0035387592,0.00016352042,0.00005481308,0.000039064766,0.00049506366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8881093,0.038304385,0.021576721,0.006269329,0.044208124,0.0015322082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63012713,0.21041392,0.031712607,0.0068267086,0.11612714,0.00479251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09754302,0.0020811588,0.0037554975,0.033127114,0.0056778146,0.017983068,0.0053208037,0.00706602,0.0014396282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23853807,0.0014737184,0.0016977693,0.03363695,0.015717033,0.025118338,0.0058027385,0.008362079,0.0014092516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069492795,0.00010973773,0.0020343286,0.042890225,0.00013089932,0.0003497111,0.003220421,0.00069248676,0.00078835414,0.06505493,0.05269588,0.8319636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002574971,0.00015587179,0.005696722,0.10427015,0.00028236516,0.0023143787,0.005284982,0.0010629839,0.0009503862,0.06473914,0.8149924,0.00022469161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073354864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012427991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012921469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033584815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51586294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080391594","doi":"10.1051/medsci/20082467641","title":"Repenser le sens de la communication scientifique : l’accès libre","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"médecine/sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5020593832902432,"score_gpt":0.5264976335133597,"score_spread":0.02443825022311641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080391594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012660773,0.038054444,0.00916315,0.43486452,0.00938422,0.00010519544,0.00022280666,0.0003350697,0.49520978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4209031,0.045123696,0.010648118,0.109685175,0.010596994,0.00044129527,0.00037321317,0.000800647,0.40142778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94571626,0.017414168,0.0027936792,0.00486092,0.02517485,0.004040134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8865348,0.060512565,0.0074175536,0.013613815,0.0236149,0.008306331],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622112,0.00063936686,0.000916801,0.005747409,0.01829295,0.04552828,0.0028450533,0.012353989,0.014569257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066869564,0.00090699305,0.00082484516,0.008027399,0.06469763,0.025826775,0.012744354,0.015181404,0.004717856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039545615,0.000015548705,0.0005976585,0.0002697254,0.00001803205,0.00015313349,0.026087955,0.000059637776,0.00051752344,0.8983499,0.043677155,0.030214233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012198531,0.000019117368,0.0011173082,0.00051088544,0.000020500594,0.00013088381,0.0059131337,0.00006582607,0.00046648728,0.03805939,0.9536415,0.0000429087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13268942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12754925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99715495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03654948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08161769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26518625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080449773","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504701305","title":"Scientific international collaboration of Turkey, Greece, Poland, and Portugal: A bibliometric analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portuguese; Turkish; Mainstream; Political science; Geography; Library science; European region; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Regional science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.09062337609994872,"score_gpt":0.45583174414202726,"score_spread":0.36520836804207857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080449773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879693,0.0016694453,0.0003059288,0.0001320184,0.000012949673,0.000020450521,0.0009395409,0.000012089661,0.00893827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808717,0.0006321587,0.00033322242,0.0000060115412,0.000011043133,0.000016057369,0.0006368844,0.0000034235552,0.00027414315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974612,0.0006418972,0.0005154489,0.00029287444,0.0008788559,0.00020975152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037665,0.003385232,0.0037737794,0.00034545406,0.0016899643,0.00042894817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002701653,0.00018766265,0.0004337884,0.022259405,0.00061294937,0.002548789,0.00024604582,0.0002797777,0.0011047081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010799748,0.000090441004,0.0003605256,0.032437157,0.00037760823,0.001272824,0.00131858,0.00015582774,0.00019652901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018744089,0.00006709422,0.9257574,0.0005154299,0.0003681925,0.000708341,0.004021174,0.0016065532,0.000442214,0.002220381,0.001392853,0.062712915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009487533,0.000043382843,0.9770716,0.00019791028,0.00015829862,0.00048164008,0.010485091,0.002210498,0.0005710357,0.00038835852,0.0083660865,0.000016605578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033357085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037184993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99729836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011140747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013547726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014287889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080497488","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1457-6","title":"Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Interdisciplinarity; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Engineering ethics; Biology; Social science; Computer science; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4283907410291913,"score_gpt":0.5475682690263628,"score_spread":0.11917752799717152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080497488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74864334,0.013583975,0.045146886,0.030104082,0.00017529265,0.00009034866,0.00043610105,0.00012520434,0.16169481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811476,0.0029104778,0.012683448,0.00035204898,0.00007203856,0.00002564788,0.000114592505,0.00003453255,0.0026595641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938059,0.0038612976,0.00018831046,0.000505753,0.0010434246,0.000595299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722821,0.02022944,0.0026031665,0.001303332,0.0017158695,0.0018661208],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073921774,0.00040854618,0.0007500388,0.014570921,0.004915513,0.012749071,0.0017262554,0.0027286056,0.0058893487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022861015,0.00042260517,0.0009106637,0.03797871,0.008491612,0.017103577,0.0062155495,0.0022811203,0.00053374853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018356409,0.00019013157,0.062033825,0.0006011521,0.00021354631,0.0027412504,0.035616737,0.009027052,0.001873704,0.785042,0.0031208305,0.09935611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054488253,0.00009213208,0.081133015,0.0006091113,0.00015225023,0.0016385161,0.08348007,0.028043928,0.0015953631,0.70674026,0.09636317,0.00009775782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020326765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021938538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063798786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062511005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046289444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080526086","doi":"10.1142/s0219649213500378","title":"Impact of Funding on Scientific Output and Collaboration: A Survey of Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Productivity; Scientific literature; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Management science; Economics; Library science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.36590943039803103,"score_gpt":0.526067848828404,"score_spread":0.16015841843037293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080526086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051493026,0.9146009,0.0016344461,0.008711694,0.000544746,0.00003772116,0.0005985421,0.000042654257,0.022336278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24825798,0.74598587,0.0018014075,0.0009431182,0.0015337794,0.00007050206,0.00056110625,0.000038505008,0.00080772326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97115797,0.010519966,0.0040394063,0.0018418944,0.011565363,0.0008754168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6884276,0.26207462,0.024822203,0.0025749127,0.020091679,0.0020088833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02541442,0.0007632032,0.0018586393,0.02556671,0.0011446467,0.008057649,0.0011340615,0.0019384965,0.004343788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118196435,0.00041839384,0.0013461706,0.051515922,0.00239333,0.0063988203,0.002674864,0.0011017759,0.0008478836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002757641,0.00014072153,0.06383547,0.05194523,0.0012231001,0.0006458927,0.0040319934,0.0013593495,0.0006450789,0.02078377,0.010485917,0.8446277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007660031,0.0007394851,0.3301118,0.117979966,0.003372182,0.004997264,0.020230751,0.001561071,0.002674015,0.03690372,0.48105752,0.00029558773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015776256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015278537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032903154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006017016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13440591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081041601","doi":"10.1126/science.1208378","title":"Improving Asia-Pacific Science Collaboration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Geography; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.4525723447399806,"score_gpt":0.5822745840511611,"score_spread":0.12970223931118047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081041601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030550146,0.0064259083,0.0074213254,0.8459577,0.008520146,0.0012304108,0.0023554768,0.0007467664,0.09679217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39166248,0.038270034,0.120100744,0.3603724,0.0066646896,0.00540127,0.005170622,0.00030579517,0.07205198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873197,0.006602006,0.0009533144,0.0007951465,0.002378755,0.0019509322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134455,0.02077264,0.0051696706,0.0034916515,0.033108585,0.024012003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021229392,0.0009394393,0.0007215236,0.0032376247,0.0044766264,0.009448104,0.0024079506,0.005270121,0.029798599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07531501,0.00041861885,0.0010687573,0.0061349887,0.0017260235,0.008562252,0.006585587,0.0044847555,0.0047077425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024669734,0.001472288,0.048526328,0.003956017,0.00027304754,0.0003858666,0.0046504512,0.0018594203,0.0018632687,0.019161357,0.61445177,0.3031535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050936756,0.00047750157,0.07307188,0.007416144,0.0009195359,0.00025641962,0.029525725,0.0015085083,0.0032556895,0.042574435,0.84024227,0.00024255035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030897861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084603295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046442174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07641169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1122731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081305716","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0120495","title":"Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":368,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal; Universiteit Leiden; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Altmetrics; Popularity; Social media; Citation; Mainstream; World Wide Web; Computer science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.5871440852318912,"score_gpt":0.45929722022510844,"score_spread":0.12784686500678277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081305716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850701,0.0042489753,0.003915092,0.0005495728,0.000068391455,0.0000672122,0.0020114013,0.0001868329,0.0038822857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933297,0.0010285078,0.0027524496,0.000035570272,0.0002548879,0.00007302361,0.0019217293,0.00006387494,0.0005402195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911322,0.0025526516,0.0017092162,0.0012169218,0.003006105,0.00038291616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77917707,0.14106078,0.055114903,0.0073311264,0.013446597,0.0038695426],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081677865,0.0007184247,0.0009142116,0.023052193,0.00092675607,0.005342534,0.00067914935,0.0009124038,0.0012623703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09271104,0.00024697065,0.00082720653,0.027113732,0.0010788887,0.0057679256,0.0018181752,0.0006652343,0.00090845546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024765384,0.00011965164,0.92781156,0.0006605608,0.00056191883,0.0002339881,0.002348012,0.0012819871,0.0036727935,0.0010264374,0.0013199812,0.060715456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023198545,0.00031618652,0.97860307,0.00012754626,0.00020272752,0.00095400424,0.002610603,0.0061702705,0.0025758494,0.003178042,0.005170782,0.00006779198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010239147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016737228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069824036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006191986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043195903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082127471","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0003202","title":"Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Gender balance; Peer review; Demography; Representation (politics); Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5498284711305071,"score_gpt":0.5221254123846149,"score_spread":0.027703058745892295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082127471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96462184,0.0118414415,0.008138013,0.0048810206,0.0008147861,0.00040247806,0.00066621444,0.0001770276,0.008457108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933804,0.0012558778,0.002671014,0.0010143267,0.0001647977,0.00016627168,0.00020392289,0.000066280634,0.001077024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.83624005,0.101904444,0.022567527,0.013209389,0.022888405,0.0031902567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36896846,0.43609363,0.09352156,0.030226871,0.06241354,0.008775924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14458871,0.00029179707,0.0011443414,0.007177242,0.001995058,0.0032551668,0.0016235544,0.0010440815,0.0028262364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42761835,0.00044381627,0.0008377658,0.006776622,0.0022518826,0.0021201093,0.0028158324,0.00061392755,0.00083032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077639095,0.000094412724,0.84231496,0.0018332108,0.00073577353,0.00063921115,0.03353854,0.00027648904,0.003979542,0.0012386724,0.0058137933,0.10875893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005462841,0.00032797214,0.971599,0.0006551609,0.00017177146,0.0014505829,0.013495329,0.00052868633,0.0012151155,0.0012812701,0.009103728,0.00011670399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026791492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008738904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99282277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014907137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003018839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76466733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082264049","doi":"10.1007/s11024-011-9170-6","title":"Equity and Excellence in Research Funding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Equity (law); Incentive; Inequality; Inequity aversion; Normality; Economics; Public economics; Distribution (mathematics); Higher education; Positive economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9765732857704374,"score_gpt":0.7217798884682964,"score_spread":0.254793397302141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082264049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68501,0.02569536,0.023671335,0.020782864,0.00047943753,0.000074021606,0.003340663,0.00018820023,0.24075812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950984,0.0010003945,0.00090313004,0.000115706855,0.00014834983,0.000017332168,0.00021043439,0.000017052607,0.002489085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975545,0.0039206366,0.0007692837,0.001097757,0.0030871269,0.0013697318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96324056,0.022939177,0.0053872922,0.0021146825,0.004219774,0.002098469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011898097,0.0002884964,0.0007462982,0.0074777454,0.00084006006,0.004855028,0.0006657848,0.0009902546,0.008841879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06758699,0.00022560406,0.000438847,0.011181843,0.003452593,0.004464286,0.005047545,0.0011246492,0.00056867156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017089113,0.000064125124,0.11467532,0.00030925623,0.00028497545,0.0001226451,0.0012985804,0.0030576643,0.0001490232,0.7635979,0.0072941817,0.10897549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007351466,0.00006909641,0.10692616,0.00050850713,0.00021836188,0.00033274182,0.001998777,0.006212853,0.0008849048,0.8522226,0.030521853,0.000030643456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053217933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005357954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99252224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004307716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003485585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06292391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082561485","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0074","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami: The High Cost of Academic Serials in Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Great recession; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.3750347787922275,"score_gpt":0.5282241506211722,"score_spread":0.1531893718289447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082561485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4354458,0.016885802,0.0031249167,0.2502387,0.003960644,0.00006017219,0.0009434406,0.0004009917,0.28893963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947337,0.010577153,0.0016412584,0.005738025,0.0026712837,0.000024429015,0.00036856593,0.00014448976,0.03149776],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972306,0.0006738477,0.00015958479,0.0002114284,0.0013806948,0.0003438752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862006,0.004777769,0.0021323117,0.0011339671,0.0032046565,0.0025507582],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003833598,0.0002689258,0.00038265032,0.003387907,0.0033800898,0.016123239,0.0008146771,0.002203195,0.027943913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031903993,0.00026431924,0.00020635773,0.007153178,0.004125712,0.010794399,0.0033348098,0.0027496323,0.0034271197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010509777,0.0001820178,0.041639067,0.000609284,0.00007932803,0.0043805824,0.011563479,0.0024383483,0.001034717,0.2882983,0.28613687,0.36258703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094715564,0.00029137576,0.0724378,0.00076223764,0.00008241534,0.0023007677,0.051293094,0.0038680232,0.0012522436,0.13612306,0.7313506,0.00014369967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008477792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010605141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98387676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005461302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003347142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09348166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082791602","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2002.tb00615.x","title":"Gender Differences in Publication among University Professors in Canada*","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.5747974895297615,"score_gpt":0.43107265222052765,"score_spread":0.14372483730923385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082791602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95792,0.008005403,0.00019519715,0.0048079076,0.00011900491,0.000038123915,0.005141399,0.000054492935,0.023718467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98576397,0.0025522052,0.00013670648,0.00028173457,0.00003521022,0.0000149899815,0.00061012956,0.000018851599,0.010586197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613875,0.00026455184,0.00018430973,0.00035711983,0.0017863375,0.001268924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97924566,0.004322833,0.00419738,0.0005293867,0.0070816167,0.004623189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023089016,0.00022302731,0.0006171845,0.0060733617,0.0037757633,0.003730281,0.0010889984,0.0005773178,0.007913799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014765701,0.00024792593,0.00031323126,0.015232933,0.0013611206,0.00087694207,0.0012115592,0.00047740358,0.0006640514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023323362,0.000060078764,0.89819837,0.00026162164,0.0000944749,0.00043287495,0.032145966,0.00029540234,0.00091155875,0.004565167,0.011953891,0.05084738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074997756,0.000020076353,0.971934,0.00007837224,0.000019148478,0.000064695625,0.01167518,0.0001337327,0.00019794045,0.0001489978,0.015700482,0.000019872305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96770644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98615116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034764208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05687416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25223315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083278517","doi":"10.1108/02641610610686012","title":"Document supply and open access: an international survey on grey literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Originality; Library science; Value (mathematics); Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37047102739059584,"score_gpt":0.5833922385005443,"score_spread":0.2129212111099485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083278517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296734,0.10493621,0.003332708,0.008712656,0.000072864124,0.00013332747,0.0015153689,0.000038950024,0.051584475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96980894,0.02743078,0.0011420723,0.000310208,0.00008870681,0.00005153018,0.0004837183,0.000014128684,0.00066985824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768063,0.007512302,0.003784497,0.0015456511,0.009641535,0.0007099178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66639835,0.26825792,0.035228707,0.0075866287,0.01941246,0.0031159318],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022192245,0.0002200742,0.001261979,0.04413122,0.0015290945,0.0066132275,0.0009668008,0.0010586012,0.008685145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12451317,0.00029343998,0.0005414846,0.07631471,0.0043091998,0.008418568,0.0044041816,0.0007671045,0.00064838375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046287762,0.00023214033,0.33234936,0.0114232,0.00058619725,0.0014827984,0.07793034,0.0011882444,0.0010981404,0.040027734,0.0067480835,0.5264709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005924943,0.0005748139,0.61657166,0.015288173,0.00041512368,0.004087402,0.1839354,0.0022726844,0.0015531348,0.054829966,0.120241135,0.0001712168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003385765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024796745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99338675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033400455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037203226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11736518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084394153","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.002","title":"On the citation lifecycle of papers with delayed recognition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Period (music); History; Computer science; Library science; Art","score_opus":0.4451528031489057,"score_gpt":0.4940995388492365,"score_spread":0.04894673570033081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084394153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87612337,0.0041457736,0.08624568,0.005274974,0.0002883484,0.00016515418,0.0018218368,0.00041026215,0.025524618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98334056,0.0011877327,0.0064116986,0.00006860437,0.00014670799,0.000052473435,0.0006901997,0.00006837276,0.008033647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980963,0.00051247684,0.00015254517,0.0002831489,0.0005041363,0.00045147946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94206846,0.035938468,0.007546068,0.004236143,0.007558767,0.002652041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008430132,0.0004413705,0.0009966637,0.0039376603,0.0011906486,0.0051335706,0.0018595814,0.0017818564,0.011776122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078601345,0.0003834555,0.0009834596,0.0039749197,0.001759962,0.0076457975,0.0021161898,0.0017770766,0.0013706974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011814986,0.0005453447,0.06883934,0.0004622753,0.00013603708,0.0010609315,0.0010956764,0.0873054,0.0052081966,0.64459467,0.00901459,0.1805561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013410508,0.00040474106,0.029713953,0.000178113,0.00018569565,0.00056806614,0.0010574803,0.5447616,0.005479702,0.40771797,0.009645452,0.00015317487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005272181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022796525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99606234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020307638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026926398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04458338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084570353","doi":"10.1093/biosci/bit007","title":"Scientific Publications: Moving beyond Quality and Quantity toward Influence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioScience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7292506735952365,"score_gpt":0.6036133815590274,"score_spread":0.1256372920362091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084570353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017937947,0.13957207,0.10737564,0.5282458,0.009036387,0.0002762957,0.0004288793,0.00049545855,0.1966315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73597556,0.11172491,0.04433789,0.054250654,0.036965195,0.0006288,0.0002663952,0.00087441306,0.014976192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87923205,0.053458225,0.007510449,0.010347669,0.0470171,0.0024345426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6367963,0.25722188,0.02540391,0.026835727,0.04361555,0.010126601],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11045986,0.0018721999,0.0036737428,0.02474989,0.006326715,0.05463931,0.004384049,0.010045732,0.009303765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23261392,0.0012639752,0.0017858368,0.026707735,0.0667689,0.083897695,0.02130992,0.015059014,0.0036489572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006687692,0.000033693246,0.0024754093,0.0010388782,0.00014728175,0.00007299895,0.00520188,0.00045805992,0.00020479193,0.91526294,0.0072423895,0.0677948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033310844,0.000054945864,0.0017255188,0.0010861772,0.00006260544,0.0000889627,0.0017867078,0.0005725174,0.00019684584,0.9330311,0.061303973,0.000057442798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025319746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014539282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098521635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5841745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084571473","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20109.x","title":"Good news for the people who love bad news: an analysis of the funding of the top 1% most highly cited ecologists","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Incentive; Citation; Political science; Impact factor; Visibility; Subject (documents); Public relations; Economics; Geography; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3780672626437092,"score_gpt":0.5150965363020076,"score_spread":0.13702927365829837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084571473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851382,0.0020865249,0.00023254802,0.0020196869,0.000071797964,0.000022295959,0.0022801263,0.00002326335,0.008125672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942268,0.0014766661,0.00022975054,0.00020635362,0.00028395795,0.000039210438,0.0017689456,0.000020804737,0.0017473892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967091,0.00083808653,0.00044100208,0.00021019307,0.0012310382,0.0005704708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365867,0.029019466,0.019166382,0.0014414052,0.009103388,0.0046826936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034698893,0.0002010791,0.00073531,0.015042941,0.0012095729,0.0035911668,0.00047490385,0.0008986027,0.0039684926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041151986,0.00013883866,0.00046320877,0.024251916,0.0006742663,0.0023392388,0.0015000413,0.00056884775,0.0012122397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039181672,0.00012922425,0.91810876,0.00034020646,0.00023428138,0.0003651989,0.0059029977,0.00015181623,0.0004513894,0.001461254,0.009363626,0.06309944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027616245,0.00007373988,0.97972655,0.00011381815,0.00013213554,0.0003888516,0.007504709,0.0005194762,0.00021318161,0.000699059,0.010574479,0.000026369027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004068402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049073356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071457226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088389986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01835072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085482817","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2012.212","title":"Identifying Breakthroughs: Using Topic Modeling to Distinguish the Cognitive from the Economic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Proxy (statistics); Economics; Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6792139116975349,"score_gpt":0.570427133955346,"score_spread":0.10878677774218881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085482817","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4729472,0.0049984474,0.5062836,0.002798265,0.00024040048,0.00070793205,0.0022494537,0.0013558264,0.008418839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88779396,0.0012429573,0.10624781,0.00016114411,0.00047767328,0.00055470923,0.0021739854,0.00011742438,0.0012304275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955505,0.0020103354,0.0004327126,0.00090343354,0.0007692881,0.00033374075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432273,0.048566535,0.0037869746,0.0016260484,0.001995801,0.00079723616],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011970834,0.0012104166,0.0016620543,0.01893121,0.0013893428,0.005554248,0.001225986,0.0026179787,0.0016059941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039142642,0.00060328975,0.0027896466,0.009290778,0.0010976468,0.0063720667,0.0018855992,0.0019987281,0.0008095974],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013403178,0.0012186961,0.21441342,0.0017837676,0.0013812085,0.00077947177,0.009955587,0.09948438,0.011821689,0.049471773,0.009828679,0.59852105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016495444,0.00023677382,0.044177953,0.00018155584,0.0004956278,0.00043997078,0.0015127136,0.8567999,0.0028451008,0.08582106,0.007145168,0.00017915714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004096057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032037226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015979854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013188274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0633086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086149705","doi":"10.3390/publications1010016","title":"Types of Open Access Publishers in Scopus","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scopus; Library science; Political science; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); The arts; Open access publishing; Publication; Scholarly communication; History; Law; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.8429619023098723,"score_gpt":0.6921808320267508,"score_spread":0.1507810702831215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086149705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7727738,0.028273817,0.00883928,0.0054117264,0.0015134221,0.001403171,0.020933153,0.0010578516,0.1597939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468697,0.01170882,0.0061772354,0.0010902056,0.0010862317,0.00076761155,0.00992856,0.0005171953,0.021854503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94703376,0.008567052,0.012894115,0.0028948828,0.02464261,0.0039675143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7215875,0.11603069,0.071356304,0.016694307,0.053089,0.021242244],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0229296,0.0006490428,0.0014248637,0.03565931,0.0031786724,0.017478887,0.002366133,0.0011393398,0.014636066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18794551,0.0008442726,0.0011982898,0.07627384,0.0014845647,0.010528961,0.0054960675,0.0011795211,0.0052168015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066931685,0.00028709974,0.75668675,0.0030410017,0.0005918533,0.0018452834,0.013063181,0.0004103022,0.0013507374,0.0143468985,0.024068985,0.18363854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000224432,0.0008790134,0.6495795,0.0046698716,0.0006371427,0.011808355,0.042077728,0.0017512245,0.0033755382,0.022702122,0.2619386,0.00035648013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019320789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002959156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017495713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049606017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121264756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087529277","doi":"10.1126/science.323.5910.36a","title":"Literature Citations in the Internet Era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.520434424539065,"score_gpt":0.579042658373102,"score_spread":0.058608233834037016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087529277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029616045,0.49541697,0.0028787607,0.15344404,0.023598777,0.000093657436,0.007745601,0.00070805755,0.28649813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34794873,0.45062095,0.007561125,0.02618502,0.054898143,0.00025556402,0.008212609,0.0005086308,0.10380936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911642,0.0016099099,0.0009714201,0.00092801545,0.0048454413,0.00048099694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96296495,0.013716255,0.0071268743,0.0014841298,0.012300748,0.002406992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057917535,0.00044883962,0.0008161032,0.036909893,0.0025952775,0.011586185,0.0010517846,0.0034823304,0.026555907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05198839,0.00032285546,0.0004938069,0.069131844,0.0023714697,0.014984601,0.0042905724,0.001938252,0.009896404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056052275,0.000036184687,0.014605923,0.0015474957,0.000066443215,0.00029515385,0.0024712398,0.00029798097,0.00020953966,0.09164403,0.5433572,0.34541285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015270676,0.000041049174,0.031884123,0.002619694,0.000051363364,0.0006288363,0.0013465058,0.0003759665,0.00018576455,0.034817226,0.92798585,0.000048279817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007021956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065719998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038694902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038182375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08883834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088858100","doi":"10.1515/itit-2014-1048","title":"Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"it - Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Microblogging; Social media; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Data science; Data mining","score_opus":0.36573883847070077,"score_gpt":0.4990475180976115,"score_spread":0.13330867962691073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088858100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97649527,0.0025548965,0.0023784281,0.0012953545,0.00021564042,0.000075811426,0.005113344,0.00014270154,0.0117286295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961253,0.00029265883,0.00080460333,0.00006301918,0.00014341697,0.000047472167,0.0015692693,0.000043185828,0.0009110749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373996,0.002070445,0.0006688417,0.0006552084,0.0024422836,0.00042338448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93113506,0.047644697,0.01112839,0.0016963065,0.0067419223,0.001653597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070375428,0.0004510717,0.00094491837,0.014788595,0.0006139325,0.004634038,0.0005159793,0.00070487836,0.0026613087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064913295,0.0001717226,0.0005911945,0.012746202,0.00082147785,0.0042691324,0.0014908648,0.0007758204,0.0014483146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012511702,0.00020492455,0.8812058,0.00061958446,0.0011430111,0.00017960588,0.004326288,0.001222568,0.0025159381,0.004885475,0.005721387,0.0967241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045821715,0.00043800325,0.95769,0.00018365448,0.00040553245,0.0003972394,0.008400273,0.00869565,0.0033825473,0.006235588,0.013999726,0.00012583338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001858494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019540715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088782527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035315836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03721851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089139733","doi":"10.3354/esep00090","title":"Re-interpretation of influence weight as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Impact factor; Index (typography); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.37579894210087184,"score_gpt":0.52889130908522,"score_spread":0.15309236698434814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089139733","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109292,0.028726747,0.7319839,0.008584756,0.004635641,0.00060844654,0.0022683586,0.0024175746,0.111482576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8376171,0.005843018,0.14164041,0.0009198028,0.0023380434,0.0005632041,0.00076449,0.0005847947,0.009729021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98003894,0.0060307398,0.0020502077,0.0020183066,0.0093141105,0.0005476029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460749,0.030306647,0.0053993594,0.008002518,0.009319955,0.00089656265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017640414,0.0017355096,0.0019918839,0.03264701,0.0015357293,0.010215421,0.0022898722,0.0018376425,0.003154657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10791203,0.00043742466,0.0016841504,0.029444298,0.0067835264,0.011183113,0.0047689965,0.0026704522,0.0013872795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040871743,0.00012789437,0.028646113,0.0020394062,0.0007434756,0.00057065306,0.008980901,0.008101749,0.008097543,0.46354294,0.012436191,0.46630445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007088407,0.00027269026,0.037897516,0.0007501118,0.0005587797,0.0014007807,0.0033392203,0.03593611,0.0076212822,0.780163,0.13170181,0.00028783383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020535558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015750043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024830915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014730688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093292534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089560665","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0003","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Psychology; Scientific literature; Population; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.8410412911769377,"score_gpt":0.5958931120667178,"score_spread":0.2451481791102199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089560665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90947765,0.013271645,0.017568769,0.01022379,0.0012867067,0.0032523938,0.00029206625,0.00039967027,0.04422731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700089,0.003748994,0.01692157,0.00047142693,0.0011689258,0.0005635635,0.00022129562,0.00006879546,0.006826511],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88567686,0.06714364,0.008059619,0.0031529851,0.033824787,0.0021421136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69740045,0.15231937,0.051749814,0.0094151255,0.07763172,0.011483542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052330665,0.0005137214,0.0008974325,0.006919431,0.004441764,0.0083739525,0.0021213787,0.0015371813,0.002717318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21691984,0.00035644998,0.0006757653,0.005269481,0.0024670747,0.0041330964,0.002255526,0.0011221525,0.0018265296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011552338,0.0017937436,0.16333188,0.0035910504,0.00041979208,0.002927114,0.073463164,0.0015842167,0.010164275,0.009992993,0.022954231,0.7086223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004954933,0.004774394,0.59675556,0.00262545,0.0005575637,0.008260782,0.11473529,0.010247627,0.015117855,0.023887675,0.22168452,0.0008577325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016033768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017038252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002411481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012856362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27675426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089604928","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157","title":"Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":830,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Confidence interval; Confounding; Logistic regression; Bibliometrics; Demography; Relative risk; Medicine; Library science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.8228296145688352,"score_gpt":0.6782495007557224,"score_spread":0.14458011381311275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089604928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059449982,0.030751072,0.014956148,0.022940813,0.05309745,0.002124676,0.141325,0.008118743,0.6672361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22267607,0.021297226,0.02324967,0.0050125695,0.022773417,0.0015768036,0.12278732,0.002786618,0.5778403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936021,0.00085350993,0.0011193991,0.00082043174,0.0026125773,0.0009919844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664139,0.0059890193,0.0054105558,0.006045898,0.0092699565,0.006870595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007155688,0.0012707477,0.0024258255,0.019498529,0.0023387712,0.015352988,0.0027534766,0.0024253745,0.2736974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03507226,0.00062934187,0.0018444615,0.026334498,0.0011262504,0.0057263575,0.005924292,0.0021450357,0.09373963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054450834,0.00026660258,0.015535573,0.005124585,0.00051339885,0.002018975,0.0007390843,0.00035286008,0.0030078425,0.035112496,0.64032215,0.29646203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001584271,0.000070658505,0.014769206,0.0007306554,0.0001486974,0.0011872655,0.00036109923,0.00036026133,0.0007899583,0.009206591,0.97213775,0.000079395024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011352116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019861497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00153245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063338024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91560906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089724844","doi":"10.1353/ils.2011.0009","title":"Comparative Analysis between Impact Factor and h-Index for Psychiatry Journals / Analyse comparative du facteur d'impact et de l'indice h dans les revues de psychiatrie","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Index (typography); Web of science; Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Political science; Computer science; Internal medicine; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3804788891576659,"score_gpt":0.5174789162242389,"score_spread":0.137000027066573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089724844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768217,0.006188327,0.0019727964,0.00041399212,0.00008105166,0.000054015425,0.004929811,0.00012135125,0.009416996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962838,0.00049082685,0.00073408015,0.000025300913,0.00012192341,0.000021122756,0.0016778036,0.0000277516,0.00061738776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967841,0.0007628717,0.00042910306,0.0004208382,0.0012059389,0.000397122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619058,0.025715038,0.0050579295,0.001662218,0.0036733933,0.0019857183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054771416,0.0004195381,0.0010912712,0.021897899,0.00044462294,0.0020672814,0.0005404289,0.0005555628,0.0049106595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029229434,0.00017938236,0.0015518928,0.019154849,0.0006909723,0.0022283832,0.0008498824,0.0005648413,0.0008190739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000771359,0.00010300895,0.9426474,0.00036389887,0.0014073137,0.00020010555,0.00074611005,0.0010743794,0.0010737635,0.0011068033,0.001206891,0.04929894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014843072,0.00013288169,0.9972276,0.000019146712,0.000116557014,0.00010952881,0.0004239237,0.00052695046,0.00027081405,0.0003607641,0.0007804083,0.000016547861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010669631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072125257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99452287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011535644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028966248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089745446","doi":"10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013","title":"The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":420,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Publication; Citation; Impact factor; Citation impact; Political science; Business; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.7282197861646095,"score_gpt":0.6839351451472796,"score_spread":0.04428464101732987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089745446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017180383,0.082737446,0.045605753,0.52161044,0.008828687,0.0002372485,0.0008293831,0.00038787938,0.32258272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6621473,0.07340734,0.031610068,0.13050005,0.029468825,0.001072702,0.00067451847,0.00088433333,0.070234954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8203501,0.067199074,0.009873789,0.011876999,0.08489562,0.0058044316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59571457,0.28058064,0.028063815,0.03544213,0.049900774,0.010298168],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10880452,0.0010956263,0.0031585821,0.014457768,0.008757322,0.027120639,0.003428579,0.01280262,0.017162643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32810086,0.0011797817,0.0014805299,0.022326296,0.054804202,0.05408777,0.016843595,0.01067741,0.00495708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010007316,0.000034060842,0.00189916,0.000765044,0.000090025525,0.00015687439,0.0011155634,0.00031811406,0.00017846146,0.8832118,0.04736752,0.064763255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005358753,0.00004649837,0.0020028485,0.0006098192,0.000041356114,0.00024851467,0.0009417762,0.00038245184,0.00038080785,0.8685567,0.12666824,0.000067433786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007095212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004676441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01252168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012026911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57542014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090887210","doi":"10.3138/ptc.57.4.251","title":"Peering into Peer Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiotherapy Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Computer science; Peer review; World Wide Web; The Internet; Biology","score_opus":0.3929032140128865,"score_gpt":0.5880770106911629,"score_spread":0.1951737966782764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090887210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011439107,0.011594601,0.04523795,0.14025696,0.3383882,0.021362182,0.007057761,0.013313233,0.41135004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033843983,0.007989196,0.030225828,0.0058134887,0.033340126,0.005465076,0.006525761,0.0044452683,0.87235117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89936745,0.017585222,0.012618121,0.0064865733,0.056233678,0.007709011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35825655,0.02944957,0.015135858,0.053153593,0.51415735,0.029847201],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06661953,0.003480527,0.007434451,0.01927494,0.015032586,0.03519606,0.0059882156,0.010510542,0.26827392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30427328,0.0024746433,0.0031535549,0.012780113,0.008334273,0.011036853,0.011935445,0.008679924,0.33932102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078507175,0.00008547325,0.00057734654,0.0010655101,0.00007138806,0.00017753335,0.0006450112,0.000092083326,0.0014528754,0.0037045404,0.8754419,0.11660777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007303904,0.00006969255,0.0046977354,0.0008922603,0.000080493344,0.00033057205,0.0007313666,0.00072713365,0.0012409078,0.009308336,0.9817463,0.00010212663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009047616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016334558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98072505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00624259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07699282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89746565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090906929","doi":"10.1097/01.ede.0000100282.03466.2c","title":"Interpreting Authorship Order and Corresponding Authorship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Accountability; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8021091696779195,"score_gpt":0.634156637234322,"score_spread":0.16795253244359742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090906929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018651541,0.009403429,0.023928933,0.61075026,0.3178079,0.00030801972,0.0023489974,0.0004228048,0.016378159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42524815,0.010940624,0.04038857,0.22419155,0.2757019,0.00096036197,0.0024186731,0.001037246,0.01911302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92241216,0.053116415,0.009065668,0.0043547335,0.00934992,0.0017011773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42835826,0.41977027,0.06301087,0.017463075,0.06477442,0.0066231024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06172746,0.0010159919,0.0010225305,0.0039683343,0.003895004,0.0063022734,0.0028940893,0.004500165,0.023171408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.547566,0.0007283169,0.00048886193,0.005432266,0.005378544,0.007699384,0.0050154645,0.004819101,0.0045696264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028171935,0.000034608984,0.010666055,0.0012905711,0.00007589984,0.0006975258,0.0063946876,0.00021188527,0.00022428516,0.023007467,0.8960006,0.061114587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015031821,0.00015887871,0.011332097,0.003880087,0.00012864254,0.0020681622,0.005946029,0.0030772106,0.0014603917,0.05949407,0.91209936,0.00020468755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012171164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002002217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99549985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002244373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052378527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32644993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090960911","doi":"10.3152/095820210x492495","title":"Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9310062741247978,"score_gpt":0.7398197713321439,"score_spread":0.1911865027926538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090960911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99579215,0.00051214604,0.00011925402,0.00037017092,0.0000032527157,0.000009796297,0.00025646604,0.000004071641,0.0029327313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938095,0.00015649779,0.000035108405,0.000032060936,0.000010410806,0.0000030228978,0.000099866615,0.0000021138676,0.00027995283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950181,0.0008353809,0.0003025904,0.0005509134,0.0017649499,0.0015279138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703977,0.01315287,0.0077451514,0.0008104697,0.0046886303,0.0032051262],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007121101,0.00023675825,0.0010023013,0.010089548,0.0020188726,0.0034045114,0.0011028417,0.0005905601,0.0036536078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03210219,0.0001937648,0.00034483793,0.014522109,0.002950037,0.0021366319,0.002324248,0.00048356573,0.0004190525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013207812,0.000031269537,0.9815823,0.000031447653,0.00010783233,0.000059985625,0.0032649676,0.00016894499,0.00016651984,0.0011408045,0.0005294127,0.0127845835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008888487,0.000037803333,0.99297136,0.000025202608,0.000029785413,0.000049566923,0.005148883,0.0004960863,0.00007527395,0.00045253578,0.0006926337,0.000012017914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32294723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37128475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042979554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033525021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6421349},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2091227949","doi":"10.5539/cis.v3n2p19","title":"A Bibliometric Assessment of Canadian Software Engineering Scholars and Institutions (1996-2006)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; York University; Universities Space Research Association; St Mary's University; Concordia University; Acadia University; McMaster University; University of Windsor; University of Regina; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Victoria University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Computer science; Institution; Event (particle physics); Field (mathematics); Impact factor; Library science; Software; Bibliometrics; Political science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.2499999798335201,"score_gpt":0.4837381573303529,"score_spread":0.23373817749683282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091227949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61978513,0.042397194,0.0016410332,0.0074820975,0.0004912711,0.00051883765,0.15445158,0.0006700391,0.17256287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87376255,0.02797296,0.0044462634,0.00047842195,0.00024747427,0.00022862652,0.061463952,0.00010155104,0.031298183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98503983,0.0003811881,0.00071000267,0.00055409514,0.011948065,0.0013668718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438474,0.0016687497,0.004912115,0.0006756423,0.045868736,0.0030274803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054664793,0.00071397156,0.0009825166,0.09657968,0.005875986,0.006544065,0.0018875046,0.0005840871,0.003137762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028739326,0.00030862217,0.00076594495,0.17494306,0.00094655016,0.0019367224,0.0020442887,0.0004680784,0.0010182662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043419295,0.00014323177,0.570078,0.003482358,0.0004397768,0.00056656275,0.007886986,0.0021316868,0.001446933,0.009609663,0.11449895,0.28928155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018432866,0.000055882796,0.87607825,0.0004263544,0.00017218497,0.00022770921,0.004191254,0.0009526117,0.00083778246,0.00031462882,0.11663473,0.00009009454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9736669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99453354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08054383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110758714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092739591","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2009.12.001","title":"Combining commercial citation indexes and open-access bibliographic databases to delimit highly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Citation; Scientometrics; Scopus; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Data science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; Citation database; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7928641188145871,"score_gpt":0.6879661796861452,"score_spread":0.10489793912844192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092739591","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1548882,0.012344549,0.7431931,0.004229932,0.0015284965,0.0014592151,0.01696963,0.010612605,0.05477426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2770422,0.004511342,0.6992574,0.0003683114,0.00101354,0.0011215485,0.012080366,0.0009995018,0.003605757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98083043,0.0070375293,0.0039006528,0.0012819996,0.006422659,0.0005267057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92068017,0.045749873,0.0067725736,0.008402897,0.016895879,0.0014986092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016169151,0.0014019267,0.0021489267,0.032994222,0.0016661016,0.017714828,0.0019270703,0.0015913026,0.006488825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107048124,0.0007579778,0.0014840051,0.062308047,0.0008758044,0.012214735,0.005862308,0.0016244774,0.003467326],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070514187,0.00084216753,0.03278134,0.0028230837,0.0009383909,0.0002305812,0.001622565,0.011404479,0.0112012895,0.06335532,0.02170214,0.8523935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087839004,0.0009381868,0.07150097,0.001996163,0.0037352375,0.0008800629,0.006330225,0.37413716,0.046241224,0.28200725,0.21052028,0.0008348899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004348782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010735943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98383087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019286668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004457721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085511625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092782190","doi":"10.1109/iceeli.2012.6360656","title":"Scientists' collaboration in the social sciences field: Investigating the determinants of scholarly collaboration in the Canadian context 2001–2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Context (archaeology); Productivity; Regional science; Subject (documents); European union; Human capital; Knowledge production; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social capital; Knowledge management; Scientometrics; Technology transfer; Citation; Social science; Economic growth; Business; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Geography; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.4716494517758263,"score_gpt":0.5790737991872292,"score_spread":0.10742434741140294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092782190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535683,0.0056828805,0.0002783044,0.009622774,0.00009294325,0.00012519924,0.007689571,0.000034735454,0.022905188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98851764,0.0027230051,0.0003778327,0.00034623782,0.00003832863,0.000059834943,0.0019334991,0.000011249688,0.0059924717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951369,0.0004468813,0.00030061763,0.00047580132,0.0023421494,0.001297692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646195,0.0031640944,0.00648404,0.0006665579,0.017953668,0.0071121315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038242328,0.00040151377,0.0006568096,0.009194128,0.010433727,0.0045848433,0.0024450645,0.0012775047,0.004656217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023248563,0.00027565547,0.00052903703,0.026761819,0.0018115083,0.0021796373,0.003622663,0.0017463189,0.0006025749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002507096,0.00018642707,0.8672114,0.0005810574,0.00014757247,0.000502647,0.043573894,0.0007854714,0.0003701765,0.006249664,0.019055031,0.061085895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012211196,0.000023852292,0.94821846,0.00024526374,0.000051137224,0.00012227039,0.02838391,0.0004988558,0.00017317194,0.00031616198,0.021907829,0.000046930716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99738175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99617577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10883641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23340106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092866295","doi":"10.1126/science.1192830","title":"Japanese Science in a Global World","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Investment (military); Government (linguistics); Debt; Politics; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Science policy; Economic growth; Economics; Development economics; Finance; History; Public administration","score_opus":0.31786677907372884,"score_gpt":0.6004036584251579,"score_spread":0.282536879351429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092866295","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012328666,0.03229204,0.00007330033,0.107842594,0.85645646,0.000010917339,0.0000917824,0.0000386785,0.0030709822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002229616,0.044990618,0.00016400413,0.06262592,0.86752695,0.000027672291,0.000102070786,0.000049992726,0.022283193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949344,0.000782404,0.000805357,0.0004920666,0.0026274065,0.0003584893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849022,0.0040017795,0.0007818943,0.00044803336,0.0074529834,0.0024130102],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070070927,0.003023974,0.0027783,0.0045085168,0.0036871873,0.011050936,0.002230788,0.008985955,0.009029606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01894321,0.00077429967,0.0013779654,0.0045303497,0.0036574793,0.00469812,0.0020350378,0.012535143,0.006155906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012584913,0.0000060487046,0.000050693317,0.00031084736,0.000009660015,0.00009217692,0.00005253134,0.000013192499,0.000031607284,0.00039289618,0.9940105,0.005017344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010382057,0.000005391027,0.00039094914,0.00029503592,0.00003112828,0.000084055486,0.00013505269,0.000036768568,0.000032904616,0.0005379489,0.9984314,0.000008969792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009054408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031711765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006185188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00758387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044876873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093294860","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0010","title":"Will Peer Review Still Function and How?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Computer science; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.45391483462302057,"score_gpt":0.5089795111947684,"score_spread":0.055064676571747795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093294860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026171928,0.038824417,0.012710636,0.81881315,0.02276471,0.00021487227,0.0005358933,0.0013541522,0.07861025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64710647,0.036886353,0.020220064,0.10932258,0.047676653,0.00070900633,0.0011165667,0.0020542985,0.13490796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9550117,0.01982805,0.001938733,0.0052584405,0.011012692,0.006950379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6884709,0.09000176,0.019759228,0.030900527,0.12607922,0.044788446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.100972965,0.0011484179,0.002772774,0.0046964036,0.0070654843,0.028021427,0.0049520303,0.016898809,0.018072478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24885029,0.00072802335,0.0020467737,0.0038812398,0.014364711,0.047166344,0.004325575,0.008489822,0.021409782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054587884,0.00056295807,0.014311948,0.0012272616,0.00036438217,0.00033062688,0.0030018415,0.0006182708,0.001560826,0.24578848,0.35502243,0.37666512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026722916,0.00035171845,0.019020798,0.0015281531,0.0004273037,0.00062066637,0.0059106187,0.002966193,0.00287271,0.33526438,0.6303732,0.0003969829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011024603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006557682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89902705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008562932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02841893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5340024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093566717","doi":"10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.010","title":"Into the gray: a modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Gray (unit); Citation; Information retrieval; Data science; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6302172774255392,"score_gpt":0.583660032386797,"score_spread":0.046557245038742257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093566717","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075465087,0.012676029,0.8670966,0.06574029,0.008400629,0.0035104665,0.0016750143,0.0022507978,0.031103654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06229455,0.0066475184,0.90907663,0.007878021,0.002461472,0.004733331,0.00046347556,0.0009981743,0.0054468256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8091211,0.118099734,0.017703619,0.008635719,0.04433966,0.0021002286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53876686,0.34233728,0.023297787,0.039010722,0.05377267,0.0028146254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16018012,0.0032846858,0.0036699397,0.060558304,0.0089850295,0.026411925,0.0076442966,0.006135396,0.011428317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4058386,0.0016269842,0.0051018777,0.057308555,0.021373127,0.0359088,0.017774144,0.0127538,0.0033641579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017925962,0.00007885193,0.004291143,0.004394991,0.0008139737,0.00025453,0.03837703,0.0016209799,0.0014385073,0.5767892,0.062362712,0.30939886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052083666,0.00012465633,0.0036444587,0.003233147,0.00048048186,0.00046137214,0.0074838973,0.008051678,0.0012837165,0.6417886,0.33313662,0.00025934223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008305726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015710233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014192926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018245436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84712356},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2094558251","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.11125","title":"Scientific publications in urology and nephrology journals from China: A 10 year analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Impact factor; China; Nephrology; Citation; Web of science; Mainland; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Internal medicine; Political science; Library science; Geography; Meta-analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.29743434832804894,"score_gpt":0.46960026660590676,"score_spread":0.17216591827785782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094558251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877714,0.002718339,0.00011791806,0.00010962615,0.000012616442,0.00006670883,0.007887593,0.000015777307,0.0013000976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983423,0.0028223125,0.00032799898,0.000037173693,0.000058714344,0.00013809226,0.012515714,0.000007661764,0.0006693336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978999,0.00014476769,0.0005461366,0.00022012337,0.0009210015,0.0002680791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125755,0.0017985052,0.003372109,0.00019983506,0.0024901857,0.00088186667],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024252764,0.00046629366,0.000816344,0.028816368,0.0006077738,0.0014271084,0.00047124957,0.00031304322,0.0021530227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005559407,0.00019246885,0.0013647531,0.0346972,0.00029347886,0.001131517,0.0012460325,0.00023892114,0.00039558593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014546124,0.000026669954,0.9855241,0.00042096985,0.00026259743,0.00033848503,0.00045923653,0.00017191334,0.00029695802,0.00005638152,0.00043959348,0.011857616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054301627,0.000034352463,0.99853003,0.000028230334,0.00008068946,0.000109371875,0.0002455033,0.00018090612,0.00008021086,0.000014459886,0.0006870673,0.0000037956252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020570328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023356453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99757475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020374078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003563479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040901184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095126174","doi":"10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1","title":"100 Most Cited Articles in Orthopaedic Surgery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Subspecialty; Medicine; Citation; Specialty; Subject (documents); Science Citation Index; Ranking (information retrieval); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking; MEDLINE; Evidence-based medicine; Impact factor; Medical literature; Citation analysis; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Family medicine; Library science; Information retrieval; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7154563070117698,"score_gpt":0.6409481131763418,"score_spread":0.07450819383542795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095126174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.266759,0.64091957,0.004816149,0.005749295,0.0044135805,0.0015315947,0.02910444,0.00045628982,0.046250083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6773191,0.2718639,0.021705545,0.0017321788,0.0031588506,0.0012207762,0.017992526,0.00013783929,0.004869261],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97665113,0.0035840073,0.008039426,0.0014441042,0.009641479,0.0006398339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91371757,0.054266304,0.018220095,0.0014324986,0.010989613,0.0013738902],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012534617,0.0011248555,0.0018020674,0.08586759,0.0015076201,0.006142026,0.0015908183,0.0019228394,0.008613071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06787316,0.000516608,0.0022766795,0.09187292,0.001006068,0.0029486346,0.0026574905,0.0007738652,0.0022983437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016042618,0.00022071521,0.3169074,0.1229654,0.0051204925,0.0047915266,0.003988998,0.0007998824,0.0058522043,0.0041543506,0.032924976,0.5006697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039891808,0.0007138562,0.63358474,0.07071953,0.009981669,0.017134229,0.006446076,0.0011166754,0.006003832,0.0129127195,0.24075091,0.00023682971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016087727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036104666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026478842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003961997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0662902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095560558","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.108","title":"Single Authors Are Not Alone: Colleagues Often Help","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5729729955135182,"score_gpt":0.500869914673737,"score_spread":0.07210308083978123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095560558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52968603,0.03083792,0.021655202,0.0748781,0.020787774,0.00039727808,0.0011201645,0.0017535737,0.31888393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090571,0.0053265058,0.006490835,0.010968059,0.0028336125,0.00016656137,0.00038255352,0.0005169452,0.064257875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97270185,0.009483617,0.001943408,0.0030538854,0.010684898,0.0021323776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91161,0.02761392,0.020839766,0.008061072,0.014499044,0.01737612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009279649,0.0006537613,0.0013396485,0.003035309,0.0056332373,0.0073818006,0.0012432673,0.0032590276,0.026296671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11542845,0.00051956234,0.00061027,0.004476061,0.0019049313,0.0068917987,0.00799323,0.00231976,0.01571726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000795437,0.00030408814,0.12258133,0.001941399,0.0007588995,0.0048748082,0.07372942,0.00032824842,0.0062268726,0.016312772,0.26938063,0.502766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014711986,0.00046102048,0.055704907,0.0013200227,0.0005048776,0.01452938,0.10939873,0.0005050517,0.002669047,0.023512883,0.7909842,0.00026272438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090818584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002910426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012771733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032268357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08797115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096088228","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.67","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Index (typography); Impact factor; Science Citation Index; Social science; Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5214194647309455,"score_gpt":0.5460663255256983,"score_spread":0.024646860794752867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096088228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568512,0.011199553,0.00089788577,0.0012948274,0.00021742082,0.00001919994,0.0039504017,0.000094373565,0.025475154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99020875,0.004879349,0.0006646989,0.000035838802,0.00015701533,0.000013758904,0.0014216632,0.000017708684,0.002601188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970873,0.0004377738,0.00056166545,0.00022730517,0.0014797985,0.00020612655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825096,0.0044936338,0.007403181,0.0007667764,0.0037108827,0.00111592],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032212574,0.00041554825,0.0004748337,0.013023855,0.00042209245,0.0047301063,0.00036381788,0.00026226434,0.0023153694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014849077,0.000112099005,0.00045722176,0.021619024,0.00048486874,0.002623666,0.0012390191,0.0003506981,0.0011657403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001337781,0.00005531699,0.81199366,0.0007871053,0.0002454427,0.00031362168,0.0019480262,0.0016583563,0.0011553392,0.002769558,0.0024580897,0.17648177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070898027,0.00012315308,0.9719996,0.00029928098,0.00009741291,0.000600147,0.0018498906,0.0020354756,0.0015322462,0.0012155939,0.020208376,0.000031633455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016960938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002538341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98697615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00142495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016375319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017035842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096119600","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y","title":"Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Inequality; Publishing; Citation impact; Productivity; Publication; Gini coefficient; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Economic inequality; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.7717071333746156,"score_gpt":0.6827132583531631,"score_spread":0.0889938750214525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096119600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975848,0.0002902056,0.000986309,0.00023515173,0.0000031529528,0.000012779047,0.00013723371,0.0000050267654,0.0007452737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987128,0.00014248656,0.0007695048,0.000022242208,0.000017859813,0.000011442366,0.0001690881,0.0000052665882,0.00014925715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939674,0.0034271765,0.00038938405,0.0005326743,0.0009772278,0.0007061258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8924592,0.08647076,0.0115539655,0.0039093886,0.0033554365,0.0022511915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008969846,0.0002916277,0.00086548645,0.005907256,0.0022343593,0.002817765,0.0012052814,0.0013037372,0.0015689057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0458582,0.00024297625,0.0009889078,0.012355514,0.0021178378,0.0028311696,0.002328971,0.0012000381,0.00024433367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037159203,0.0004383492,0.95600444,0.00018083147,0.00024457957,0.0037424923,0.009654868,0.005707019,0.000719998,0.007444176,0.0006373206,0.014854421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007895889,0.00026959178,0.92721176,0.00013411534,0.00017258317,0.0035115273,0.01726845,0.03243839,0.0014577233,0.013237315,0.0041314256,0.000088143745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012054438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011021999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99409276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012985972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010135889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04743761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096432317","doi":"10.2196/jmir.8.2.e8","title":"The Open Access Advantage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Publishing; World Wide Web; Open data; Open access journal; Internet privacy; Computer science; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.7216890307649272,"score_gpt":0.7454559918373117,"score_spread":0.023766961072384518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096432317","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011810415,0.056819987,0.0028377722,0.43392614,0.46678728,0.000048976337,0.000277581,0.00011479848,0.038006414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03367722,0.050243367,0.0015842702,0.27965045,0.6038633,0.00017696671,0.00020505057,0.00025103084,0.03034846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730723,0.0055024577,0.003591725,0.003201967,0.013536658,0.0010949129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8855293,0.08650497,0.005264133,0.0036188932,0.014271736,0.0048110755],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017435834,0.00089245394,0.0013958286,0.003085946,0.0024332139,0.011249308,0.0022020317,0.0077542346,0.0068595246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09084342,0.00053455605,0.00089549186,0.0021543517,0.009600411,0.012674028,0.0051008803,0.018354425,0.002211357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063330364,0.000025292979,0.0006180244,0.0008874684,0.00006166288,0.00029594608,0.00058613677,0.00003470208,0.00017206049,0.08589466,0.8423287,0.06903204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018391816,0.00002747962,0.00095523335,0.00043248292,0.000037236805,0.00059574656,0.0002104047,0.00005446016,0.00015483542,0.0147531545,0.98273647,0.000024055396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011877663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023677095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99779797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023518498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004021609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09221059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097026038","doi":"10.18438/b89c70","title":"Looking for Links: How Faculty Research Productivity Correlates with Library Investment and Why Electronic Library Materials Matter Most","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Productivity; Investment (military); Institution; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarly communication; Ordinary least squares; Public relations; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Economics; Political science; Social science; Econometrics; Publishing","score_opus":0.3275103745388362,"score_gpt":0.47358921092200307,"score_spread":0.14607883638316688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097026038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98656136,0.00081775617,0.0011211254,0.002085467,0.00002470539,0.000016098042,0.00035550035,0.000040199826,0.008977778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973137,0.00023682546,0.00027898073,0.00015207099,0.000045575416,0.000010212606,0.00024941363,0.000019127885,0.0016941746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582654,0.0016746337,0.00036171,0.00067257555,0.00086077227,0.00060370576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9152089,0.04944508,0.023773087,0.0031126505,0.005052065,0.0034082811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052974783,0.00027679582,0.0003982336,0.0033141926,0.00081503665,0.0066052256,0.0009323108,0.0010758641,0.017760813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058625385,0.00025130177,0.00083018583,0.0075510996,0.0012846342,0.005393797,0.0019393242,0.00080827804,0.0031539884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008815991,0.00015999362,0.9756032,0.00004098784,0.00013736641,0.00007807117,0.0008234482,0.00037854508,0.000108462744,0.0011298322,0.000769138,0.020682901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140334305,0.00012368825,0.9863848,0.000110097935,0.00020096393,0.00011166867,0.0054351445,0.001856594,0.0006765001,0.002289666,0.0027760966,0.00002070641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006652443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054893424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016718666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017669272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059415817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097269731","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000027677.79173.b8","title":"The classification of biomedical journals by research level","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Science Citation Index; Information retrieval; Basic research; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.9272708597111224,"score_gpt":0.7093757539334359,"score_spread":0.21789510577768656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097269731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7224741,0.048075177,0.08663456,0.01959398,0.0037436837,0.00092232076,0.027000628,0.0015763263,0.08997918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88823307,0.009036931,0.08028091,0.0012771422,0.0021740736,0.00026317046,0.011152152,0.00017665126,0.0074059805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832947,0.0053525385,0.002511806,0.0012009772,0.006824457,0.0008154605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92344725,0.03519618,0.013430933,0.0061381403,0.018565707,0.0032217996],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010856066,0.0006549484,0.0014656088,0.053027608,0.0013235076,0.008685321,0.0015235106,0.0013435277,0.0068392195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07827959,0.00030702422,0.0015872756,0.04613135,0.0018137764,0.0047788993,0.0020088942,0.0013981941,0.0040586474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093446876,0.00042784138,0.44302097,0.0018823424,0.0012393639,0.00020227497,0.00125315,0.0013345338,0.0076536895,0.025964938,0.024512183,0.49157423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031894245,0.00087077846,0.80324,0.0010082714,0.0013052003,0.0012695594,0.0029227042,0.017464569,0.0054961494,0.10255588,0.063332096,0.00021585358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018906434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002138541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94697237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020039377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002359141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05741304},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2098507569","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1788-y","title":"Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Regional science; Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Econometrics; Data science; Library science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8230981755742243,"score_gpt":0.5877561517828117,"score_spread":0.23534202379141256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098507569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633628,0.00089963916,0.0049349573,0.00038159767,0.00002262372,0.00011334029,0.0058833295,0.00009075563,0.024310838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854891,0.00076328707,0.0047553773,0.00001694377,0.000033968572,0.00008998446,0.0068724244,0.000068405796,0.0019105586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852632,0.0050007617,0.0016146019,0.00090289983,0.0066766255,0.0005418903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96506304,0.022235096,0.0051093763,0.0016218929,0.005585371,0.00038521862],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00873641,0.00042541392,0.0009773001,0.021343185,0.00072277366,0.0044124126,0.00091805804,0.0006834265,0.0026876274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042760346,0.00018768269,0.00076150434,0.06786996,0.00083013286,0.003341309,0.0018928536,0.00055104867,0.00057873066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041886358,0.00047053784,0.72971845,0.0026438553,0.0006601521,0.0038263593,0.019224573,0.018102078,0.0040783472,0.017561432,0.0047189454,0.1985766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032100885,0.00028327864,0.88200414,0.0004231772,0.00036336115,0.0012845082,0.027668076,0.031588398,0.005824989,0.003734006,0.04665732,0.00013662777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019920813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016325504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032477013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001977741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046203136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098698373","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504201210","title":"Going beyond counting first authors in author co‐citation analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Computer science; Statistics; Information retrieval; Data science; Mathematics; Library science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.14995783970350976,"score_gpt":0.4770494582581099,"score_spread":0.3270916185546001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098698373","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4542595,0.018953389,0.4742222,0.0038357324,0.0017093722,0.0004966055,0.0018792775,0.0011859104,0.043457974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8866388,0.0019161819,0.107135445,0.0003420806,0.00080070575,0.00026484154,0.0004962754,0.00014710754,0.0022584621],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484417,0.02830623,0.002691752,0.003906688,0.0153432945,0.0013103049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6526124,0.25868514,0.024890365,0.029700598,0.031209052,0.0029024181],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036839508,0.0014267579,0.0037276223,0.023781046,0.002527125,0.011202793,0.0030369428,0.0017128893,0.0030165538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24879025,0.00045990784,0.0015237,0.031952906,0.003430085,0.0141508235,0.004900922,0.0024161532,0.0014636968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007316963,0.00048004126,0.2611608,0.0018031279,0.0023862438,0.00024851778,0.0070209363,0.011298504,0.0040917913,0.120781444,0.007617946,0.582379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024363075,0.0006405797,0.17750119,0.001648643,0.0019057766,0.0012036158,0.008080544,0.15155782,0.027988028,0.5751974,0.053524982,0.00050785945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029422222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035868632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97621894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012757872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026921597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19482821},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2100283551","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1105","title":"Point &amp; Counterpoint The Purpose of Institutional Repositories: Green OA or Beyond?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Counterpoint; Thriving; Institution; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Institutional repository; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.42596659035908846,"score_gpt":0.4744248978785353,"score_spread":0.04845830751944685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100283551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01028831,0.0114934435,0.03190304,0.7468728,0.01017053,0.0001581084,0.0002708898,0.0010667378,0.18777612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4428025,0.016586764,0.057170894,0.26875952,0.00816884,0.0005678981,0.0005064107,0.002217558,0.20321965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831699,0.0072246892,0.0009010559,0.0016522668,0.005619925,0.001432203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943942,0.021935537,0.0045209676,0.008678941,0.016680317,0.0042422004],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01690582,0.00081896776,0.0010375016,0.0050913864,0.008025307,0.03483585,0.0037835953,0.012526781,0.027832534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071087964,0.00048648345,0.0010593251,0.007268326,0.027164835,0.05061106,0.018476373,0.011501496,0.010498415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063962914,0.00003296044,0.0016521317,0.00034974577,0.000030466943,0.00042112186,0.008707937,0.00015800445,0.00027450264,0.6575548,0.23855624,0.09219815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002839154,0.000039722585,0.0010305275,0.00084830786,0.000025583926,0.00038342507,0.016472863,0.0003812839,0.0009854573,0.2413742,0.73834395,0.00008630105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005256771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006581913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064276005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010743491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09310913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100848965","doi":"10.5860/crl.63.6.562","title":"Evaluating Academic Journals without Impact Factors for Collection Management Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Citation; Annals; Impact factor; Relation (database); Medical journal; Citation analysis; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Political science; History; Data mining","score_opus":0.917280069484004,"score_gpt":0.6980711522304383,"score_spread":0.21920891725356573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100848965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828986,0.006340159,0.13094941,0.005421167,0.001118872,0.0068674786,0.002157789,0.0015076975,0.06273889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.671768,0.0009992168,0.32004791,0.0002983533,0.00080769317,0.0014431826,0.0012231516,0.00018575223,0.0032267468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78705555,0.08544592,0.030246168,0.005727291,0.08828194,0.0032431844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4373594,0.30368227,0.08478397,0.02426663,0.1404903,0.009417488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14500988,0.0020243716,0.0027923484,0.034656636,0.0042823604,0.017951181,0.0029339138,0.0020909838,0.0040913736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44786632,0.0008024253,0.0021838602,0.031231012,0.0021849514,0.009228281,0.0034685542,0.00140952,0.0009837905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037094941,0.0014961357,0.20392509,0.0027344597,0.0017009984,0.00067832664,0.0042513865,0.012010883,0.0070026433,0.023579204,0.00917104,0.7297403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026658408,0.010652419,0.43431783,0.0023653137,0.0052633,0.0017375667,0.023188844,0.24824296,0.07553437,0.111952916,0.08246606,0.0016126438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031763886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006000549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96534336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077555147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013385889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7668947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102705305","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0106-3","title":"The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Altmetrics; Graduate students; Peer review; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.7238816379522245,"score_gpt":0.6807475618396931,"score_spread":0.043134076112531394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102705305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4986594,0.021280129,0.004985989,0.3060704,0.0014919915,0.00022686702,0.017107563,0.0010557035,0.14912187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495317,0.0076177614,0.0025173903,0.009743401,0.0024654763,0.00014000162,0.004599278,0.00025452347,0.023130558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602982,0.011219433,0.004175165,0.003017925,0.018906675,0.0023826142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34398898,0.3487595,0.1302826,0.03202207,0.1097451,0.035201773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04902755,0.0005265729,0.001575425,0.027136251,0.0049235295,0.019746771,0.004903156,0.0033928505,0.07932422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39987418,0.00068739115,0.0013309885,0.054588422,0.004568963,0.016434666,0.007034578,0.00414852,0.009033242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006832891,0.00087887334,0.61374104,0.0013717625,0.0003677701,0.00031139975,0.00652529,0.0009847886,0.00066070264,0.07266164,0.058267005,0.24354637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026534,0.0002721151,0.8827834,0.00093469303,0.00020792597,0.00061294896,0.01353969,0.0012558085,0.00093348016,0.040980764,0.058305286,0.00007120704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016019013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018260308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97286373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006006567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011267153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26536596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103185235","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.010","title":"Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medical journal; Medicine; New england; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical literature; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Law; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7354483997857146,"score_gpt":0.713000899036358,"score_spread":0.02244750074935664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103185235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645436,0.00066914305,0.00023503292,0.0008115665,0.0000738275,0.000017996355,0.00037870096,0.00004542316,0.0013138695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981541,0.00020982217,0.00035568967,0.00011078225,0.0001136492,0.000013064118,0.00028880997,0.000032741053,0.00072142377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97876006,0.011828717,0.0025589836,0.0024012711,0.0030298803,0.0014210701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4564139,0.45440912,0.041719712,0.013464067,0.020545142,0.013448114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021421403,0.0005642742,0.0018425006,0.005719862,0.0016904266,0.0068662814,0.001845915,0.002298021,0.006325978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2519317,0.00047342022,0.0018559307,0.008646421,0.0015266278,0.0039050183,0.0020815688,0.0020014427,0.0013997037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009409667,0.0010150046,0.94515204,0.00021753891,0.00097505853,0.000272282,0.0012944309,0.0016320351,0.0010268277,0.0005478546,0.0013285375,0.03712878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002422568,0.0013499788,0.9901551,0.000040866333,0.0006230109,0.00036422707,0.00160511,0.0024459008,0.0008309645,0.0015360182,0.00075170206,0.000054758155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038267623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045020604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99428016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014539979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027553325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11328858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103690356","doi":"10.2319/071113-507.1","title":"Exploring the publications in three major orthodontic journals: A comparative analysis of two 5-year periods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Angle Orthodontist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Orthodontics; Medicine","score_opus":0.8034859756788659,"score_gpt":0.5749723091992582,"score_spread":0.2285136664796077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103690356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420143,0.04970845,0.00022583136,0.0003681419,0.00010330581,0.00015847664,0.0051047434,0.000036643934,0.0022800318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773362,0.016615108,0.00059710944,0.00011578161,0.0002192341,0.0002726532,0.004343486,0.000020893234,0.00047944373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901904,0.001240157,0.004042045,0.0010482982,0.0027449876,0.0007341327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91997206,0.022629062,0.045079254,0.00094441196,0.008371216,0.0030040066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064714896,0.00055879646,0.0011960868,0.045880783,0.0007538771,0.003407182,0.0008485484,0.00084717374,0.0027923456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032253902,0.00037913327,0.0018887735,0.039208155,0.0007370211,0.0032499556,0.0021025485,0.00043364597,0.00052795047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009906141,0.000111142115,0.95771235,0.0038123908,0.001082192,0.0009585798,0.0038805827,0.000071916875,0.000698047,0.00021715667,0.000900645,0.029564418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016874272,0.00018462123,0.9907665,0.00058131636,0.00028882056,0.0010871782,0.004848916,0.000039165596,0.00015474347,0.00004278498,0.001972207,0.00001685639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013745407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002461269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011765357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018516118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034224868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104239154","doi":"10.1123/apaq.18.2.119","title":"The Impact Factor and APAQ","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Prestige; Citation; Period (music); Psychology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.44843151926839125,"score_gpt":0.5541612635849343,"score_spread":0.10572974431654308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104239154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44104004,0.036427047,0.054284763,0.007891342,0.002120084,0.0016395954,0.05723617,0.0013912638,0.39796975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92328346,0.009208063,0.024555968,0.00087607116,0.001400196,0.0009726732,0.016947698,0.00021078809,0.022545097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828857,0.0033723887,0.0023599558,0.0016406614,0.009095829,0.000645521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9390269,0.02443148,0.014659369,0.0032783428,0.016045677,0.0025581552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010285053,0.0010533845,0.0010382764,0.01905074,0.0007719977,0.004445,0.0011342182,0.0011902994,0.028559413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07060861,0.00025755493,0.0013851131,0.031030374,0.0017856618,0.0065063005,0.0023778316,0.0013915495,0.0075340834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004939166,0.00045740805,0.5402556,0.0020485527,0.001054307,0.0004298404,0.0013164015,0.002954963,0.00083402585,0.04343916,0.03684173,0.36987412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055278324,0.00075776305,0.74699765,0.0006334721,0.00032296753,0.0022836083,0.0017689955,0.0027728463,0.00080064865,0.050060276,0.19333601,0.00021049679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004102155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022253394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018051689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002013014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09554076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104776127","doi":"10.1093/bja/aeq403","title":"h-indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Psychology; Statistics; Significant difference; Index (typography); Reliability (semiconductor); Validity; Mathematics; Web of science; Medicine; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Psychometrics; Computer science; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.4827083805479551,"score_gpt":0.5104722788358582,"score_spread":0.0277638982879031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104776127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940346,0.00036079754,0.00073958014,0.00011587442,0.000057104917,0.00012146615,0.00044465126,0.000051526367,0.0040744296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965359,0.00016196394,0.0022151796,0.00003703157,0.000041012456,0.00008414896,0.00023141089,0.000010684249,0.0006827461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485284,0.0017415632,0.0007810777,0.00033101437,0.0020058465,0.0002876945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810963,0.007225114,0.0034499855,0.000789583,0.005059294,0.0023797182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064256056,0.00036511652,0.000828807,0.005108521,0.0010258743,0.00138646,0.000840927,0.0008390613,0.0025112033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023585267,0.00022010862,0.0006345922,0.003995216,0.0009029606,0.0011251898,0.0017488376,0.0008860687,0.000934147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017711495,0.0011861408,0.92736673,0.0001679271,0.00014247536,0.00015024134,0.0019324163,0.0006809206,0.0014963027,0.00033709814,0.0010725613,0.063696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076682256,0.0029595073,0.99010205,0.000028913691,0.00006059001,0.00029376763,0.0021590223,0.0018494707,0.0009842714,0.000259039,0.001187224,0.00003949923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032083003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037572195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99489146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013193004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018614838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033982277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104813218","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4954h","title":"All that glitters is not gold: The shaping of contemporary journal peer review at scientific and medical journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Peer review; Dynamics (music); Process (computing); Psychology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.891900708989214,"score_gpt":0.6416149137985736,"score_spread":0.2502857951906404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104813218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4648616,0.021369519,0.0495369,0.18062493,0.0014760122,0.00023886771,0.00015969606,0.000249592,0.28148285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839337,0.0023067726,0.0031935754,0.0016099269,0.000635613,0.000045697845,0.00002168753,0.000083145365,0.0037101596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410244,0.033023577,0.001626784,0.005314861,0.015874667,0.0031356006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8982405,0.06273674,0.013465211,0.007378552,0.012370279,0.005808661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033928145,0.00028631993,0.0007920861,0.0068972535,0.008775599,0.028328383,0.001973039,0.0036550593,0.0024979038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097686276,0.0005004835,0.00045184916,0.007585762,0.053723466,0.014351026,0.007947008,0.004090476,0.0006910161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010779343,0.000053365435,0.010922051,0.00031520924,0.000059116137,0.00057597965,0.11723552,0.00086397363,0.000998613,0.80707777,0.0047548474,0.0570357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036997564,0.00011992574,0.03046725,0.00057646097,0.000042790616,0.0005417318,0.07225116,0.0017807446,0.0011435327,0.70967454,0.18319862,0.00016623051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044835634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00440779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0125497235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122389635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17943132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104991133","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p72","title":"Research Performance Measures and the Moderating Role of Faculty Characteristics in Epidemiology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Health Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Multivariate statistics; Ranking (information retrieval); Descriptive statistics; Statistics; Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Complement (music); Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Information retrieval; Biology","score_opus":0.8213244271721941,"score_gpt":0.6707080874912038,"score_spread":0.1506163396809903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104991133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300748,0.025237467,0.02186432,0.0047052554,0.00042375678,0.0005984221,0.0037546123,0.00016938217,0.0131720435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239093,0.0014323923,0.0047475817,0.00014671481,0.00021938237,0.00018510123,0.00050598825,0.000011409962,0.00036056316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97176164,0.012835488,0.0054017445,0.0021535798,0.0068418207,0.0010056925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76111305,0.1493407,0.06548495,0.0071824165,0.011650788,0.005228155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035431135,0.000589531,0.0009855076,0.012097637,0.0010700321,0.0025951613,0.00092086795,0.00088921364,0.0025313233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13031065,0.00021850191,0.0020689296,0.020593585,0.0015831596,0.002878786,0.0018543873,0.00091570936,0.0003542644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015938214,0.00010627928,0.9663459,0.0006773098,0.0011000603,0.000055207205,0.00058957475,0.00051432673,0.00010567983,0.0010879376,0.000534351,0.028724011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029787989,0.00027489298,0.99231124,0.00026714886,0.00052761636,0.00014505972,0.0007061415,0.0012167125,0.00030225748,0.0023616503,0.0018283702,0.00002930263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029320717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035678602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98790234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019028961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003549047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18737996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107222004","doi":"10.1002/asi.21621","title":"What does the g‐index really measure?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Index (typography); Consistency (knowledge bases); Statistics; Mathematics; Internal consistency; Econometrics; Computer science; Data mining; Discrete mathematics; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.2563697079422282,"score_gpt":0.4736868469626427,"score_spread":0.2173171390204145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107222004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28520092,0.097033896,0.26328972,0.14384264,0.011714431,0.000931981,0.01691472,0.0039466815,0.17712504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92522866,0.011104224,0.04564414,0.0058029667,0.003990489,0.00042349362,0.0027409054,0.0005931848,0.0044719623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98255795,0.008968929,0.0014623804,0.001664786,0.0048649535,0.00048104717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8991273,0.06649962,0.011452894,0.007934614,0.012416832,0.0025687283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019871105,0.001045357,0.0028213651,0.014829043,0.0010125003,0.008911485,0.0027234075,0.003065526,0.005804766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15156998,0.00029828105,0.0011441823,0.02405756,0.0052766763,0.009718971,0.0026158178,0.0021670454,0.004289179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005802887,0.00029454968,0.16842185,0.0030667766,0.001640337,0.00033112295,0.0014638616,0.009619922,0.0014641695,0.21727641,0.11621031,0.47963038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020415967,0.0007517236,0.15089709,0.0028277573,0.00045053524,0.001251781,0.0036183507,0.019934088,0.0027583104,0.6842238,0.13266015,0.0004222326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023059084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010314402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98517096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031379352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024288727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105089664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107753302","doi":"10.1037/a0027731","title":"Assessing the publication productivity of clinical psychology professors in Canadian Psychological Association-accredited Canadian psychology departments.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Association (psychology); Consulting psychology; Accreditation; Professional psychology; Applied psychology; Psychological research; Productivity; Professional association; School psychology; Medical education; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychotherapist; Political science; Burnout; Medicine","score_opus":0.7920265339930753,"score_gpt":0.6846769874817195,"score_spread":0.10734954651135586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107753302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8876113,0.027141463,0.0017406223,0.025842829,0.0012128568,0.00029496689,0.021920068,0.00031512982,0.033920694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799156,0.00575334,0.0023414558,0.0007621268,0.0003608851,0.0000936592,0.0045891306,0.000070364724,0.006113361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95531136,0.005198947,0.003302919,0.0025212318,0.030043563,0.0036219745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6682483,0.07185788,0.061990734,0.00847895,0.15611249,0.033311665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036966212,0.00042610854,0.00083782256,0.022232907,0.003845118,0.007144889,0.0030247017,0.00083304336,0.0033047192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25461668,0.00038138442,0.0005684713,0.03941442,0.0016396537,0.0024056619,0.0028222075,0.0009790891,0.0007112303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002321529,0.000072008275,0.8515308,0.0010652151,0.00025099993,0.00023213675,0.009443437,0.00036688932,0.0005727534,0.0021514508,0.034669768,0.09941245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019784646,0.000069812646,0.9715943,0.00018177093,0.0001055856,0.00017818769,0.0041490397,0.00054458337,0.00043662338,0.00034658835,0.02232067,0.000053054064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73022205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8717404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03661629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09196538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54273343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108009836","doi":"10.1177/154193120204601104","title":"Does the Jerome H. Ely <i>Human Factors</i> Article Award Predict Scientific Impact?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Citation; Impact factor; Variance (accounting); Productivity; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.19409163627300557,"score_gpt":0.4053774046395725,"score_spread":0.21128576836656693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108009836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698683,0.002449954,0.0012468272,0.013323668,0.000548405,0.000045795503,0.00059589685,0.000025047886,0.011896249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956956,0.0011593059,0.00047529384,0.0003975101,0.0005293868,0.00001834116,0.0002560477,0.0000065137556,0.0014620589],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976634,0.0006869972,0.00022847891,0.00014837547,0.0009960628,0.0002766969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93567467,0.028996455,0.020208875,0.0019552854,0.0071572615,0.0060073584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008290536,0.00021831534,0.0005147208,0.004108226,0.00073226466,0.0021721087,0.00048722926,0.0008676556,0.004904456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06160651,0.00013996668,0.00038233565,0.0049563106,0.0011951962,0.0018677063,0.0012489199,0.00081096817,0.0013055812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000162739,0.0001654726,0.9632346,0.0000829619,0.00009222118,0.0000945075,0.00038416992,0.00038037088,0.00016917015,0.00077667314,0.0045140726,0.029942913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032159493,0.00019453971,0.9912211,0.00005176613,0.000060607552,0.00017640839,0.0007579369,0.0013237975,0.0002669559,0.0019379549,0.00395337,0.000023503537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00589593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99589175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008322444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012459577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043845057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109652142","doi":"10.1142/s0218194013500423","title":"A BIBLIOMETRIC/GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF 40 YEARS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH (1969–2009)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Software; Computer science; Regional science; Data science; Geography; Library science; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.2055682898619816,"score_gpt":0.4921563615569048,"score_spread":0.2865880716949232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109652142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5184367,0.028964592,0.0030537744,0.0021810702,0.0005687172,0.0004946749,0.353056,0.0013340048,0.09191047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7945598,0.02113066,0.0068013053,0.00026516282,0.0009371621,0.0005112207,0.16738237,0.00019059223,0.008221685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991379,0.00084772345,0.0019330332,0.00072730694,0.0046860003,0.00042691015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700532,0.005850701,0.0115556065,0.0014771533,0.010170215,0.00089307624],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004349775,0.00081519043,0.0010319302,0.14875184,0.0011688832,0.003375292,0.00080401846,0.00071941706,0.0051530995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021495136,0.00025377792,0.0016702914,0.17176335,0.0007241619,0.004064799,0.0025658535,0.000597677,0.00239842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042099453,0.00016849443,0.6144248,0.009339281,0.0018860246,0.0008741305,0.0046883333,0.0030896866,0.0025705337,0.0079197,0.07735901,0.277259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014415485,0.00011005074,0.89698577,0.0005357302,0.00023766133,0.0008216058,0.0021775942,0.00089204544,0.0005734631,0.0007687379,0.09681361,0.000069352616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012705847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013718436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85124815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022729621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025950614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025263727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211020255","doi":"","title":"Review of: The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology As If Economics Really Mattered","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economic methodology; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3638477367674648,"score_gpt":0.47139311692735003,"score_spread":0.10754538015988524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211020255","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035560539,0.6506989,0.0011230267,0.21290734,0.1308673,0.00004980666,0.0003936407,0.000078448094,0.0035259337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012376665,0.6023885,0.002784575,0.10476085,0.2682123,0.00019236043,0.0008359364,0.00014554219,0.00830331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238,0.0021421437,0.0011633667,0.0011951309,0.0027443937,0.00037506316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9287506,0.033502195,0.0051960186,0.0022992725,0.025856826,0.00439508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014459569,0.0017060749,0.0050722416,0.014219438,0.0026870845,0.010137343,0.0037386832,0.011988866,0.008344135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060198568,0.0013014557,0.0012359533,0.014873895,0.0069526723,0.009141976,0.003923336,0.009862634,0.0043617194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005265099,0.000021933572,0.00023270553,0.006240367,0.00008807372,0.00004735393,0.00013736791,0.000106958156,0.00014865666,0.0074205557,0.90794486,0.07755847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037819646,0.00001867903,0.0015536214,0.0051886123,0.00017137188,0.0001611472,0.00016945339,0.00018830391,0.00010457597,0.008976228,0.98339224,0.000037959195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008016816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014633296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98578054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075133718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021578707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076470375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110877077","doi":"","title":"The 'Mobilization-Network' Approach for the Social Network Analysis of Knowledge Mobilization in Science Research and Innovation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mobilization; Asset (computer security); Social network analysis; Community mobilization; Resource mobilization; Civil society; Public relations; Political science; Empirical research; Social mobilization; Knowledge management; Business; Politics; Social movement; Computer science; Social capital","score_opus":0.5763332165271468,"score_gpt":0.5660140706941045,"score_spread":0.010319145833042276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110877077","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015452072,0.00094593916,0.94798344,0.0029412743,0.000202003,0.00061557454,0.0007834643,0.00025704253,0.03081923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4048456,0.0017575679,0.5792767,0.0006220533,0.00037439217,0.0038847516,0.0011424518,0.00018204458,0.007914318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224263,0.005731746,0.00028606973,0.0007363994,0.0007448827,0.00025829903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98900783,0.008185372,0.001021928,0.0010352387,0.0004278472,0.00032174602],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007184221,0.0011489891,0.00083386694,0.010873231,0.0027302254,0.005330198,0.001786364,0.002329526,0.010398736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016285969,0.00041784003,0.0019449753,0.010585256,0.005274847,0.0067285765,0.0046447706,0.0024227926,0.0013365211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040127627,0.00007738278,0.004155274,0.00040225504,0.00013779536,0.00020941845,0.0041225716,0.007127191,0.00069869426,0.93834496,0.0028336926,0.041850522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030253035,0.000070586895,0.0064316182,0.00030788395,0.00010304307,0.00045973252,0.003476487,0.07493283,0.0007160708,0.8452128,0.0681811,0.00007757246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030348673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032107409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98912674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002929994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025466077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037994266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111628838","doi":"10.2307/4132319","title":"Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Feature (linguistics); Management science; Data science; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.4369668315161285,"score_gpt":0.5654664307492029,"score_spread":0.1284995992330744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111628838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037870489,0.7736795,0.04813638,0.11285142,0.039875302,0.00375045,0.00089150335,0.00038058776,0.016647937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014741245,0.81332844,0.13390017,0.012646289,0.014250935,0.0031482973,0.0007548092,0.000100566234,0.0071293213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98254836,0.0076297075,0.0042764163,0.0007249746,0.0045787916,0.00024177079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9089958,0.040317345,0.007962378,0.002693066,0.03716743,0.0028639475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02583468,0.001256058,0.0027787082,0.015637254,0.0027951554,0.007867188,0.00263581,0.004675052,0.0035833507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10250076,0.0011413335,0.001342879,0.008079169,0.0021653066,0.01074747,0.0022046547,0.0044739707,0.0039146286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059779268,0.00014133035,0.0013768697,0.040258456,0.00032131412,0.0016560928,0.0026825033,0.0010074874,0.0028886506,0.010783377,0.1822189,0.7566054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057931735,0.00023705732,0.003306161,0.10100298,0.0007443304,0.0015689795,0.006942209,0.000881946,0.0016967122,0.040550604,0.8428167,0.00019445446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036549584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009360045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003931906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028032022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13662845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112258233","doi":"10.5539/ies.v6n11p93","title":"Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Visibility; Download; Citation impact; Computer science; Citation analysis; Higher education; Mathematics education; Data science; Information retrieval; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.6060151052682781,"score_gpt":0.6506735322684306,"score_spread":0.044658427000152545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112258233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1929569,0.023733266,0.6603416,0.017033445,0.0023504852,0.0035766696,0.00085799675,0.009005817,0.09014382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42555296,0.007950834,0.5479992,0.0012397666,0.0021114096,0.0026061714,0.0004650584,0.0006742732,0.011400268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825439,0.0074290177,0.0018249551,0.0016588619,0.005970562,0.00057261577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134604,0.052046254,0.0068894867,0.009549493,0.016641662,0.0014127839],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016776811,0.0016308632,0.0019255511,0.024310416,0.0023394923,0.0069418265,0.002249849,0.00179237,0.010367814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09400181,0.0007322497,0.000989287,0.015179051,0.001122167,0.008400719,0.0031413739,0.0016984288,0.0056488947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001591249,0.00048448343,0.0061515295,0.0013118519,0.00016042081,0.00010020771,0.0016508576,0.0016175203,0.011313925,0.026412228,0.008198203,0.94243973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010733317,0.0029964535,0.07203923,0.0036022551,0.0026590396,0.0030922315,0.010787387,0.04966793,0.08957848,0.39282495,0.37088814,0.00079057086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007512176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011644536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014281669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029355169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08872533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112470296","doi":"10.1353/pla.2005.0003","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5182908522097505,"score_gpt":0.5273793628003517,"score_spread":0.009088510590601229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112470296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64558804,0.097417526,0.020040326,0.16157171,0.0019183136,0.00020969658,0.0064369566,0.00077943533,0.066038005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382689,0.03174999,0.01484702,0.0077706906,0.002416854,0.00012391881,0.0022232214,0.0003732426,0.0022261685],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90567696,0.031991307,0.016051723,0.00600784,0.0387879,0.0014843483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4036942,0.37717935,0.08426587,0.030125476,0.10120035,0.0035347226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07888279,0.00045916627,0.0009828995,0.036385942,0.002272867,0.011325895,0.0022708036,0.0022851664,0.0011184148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33890632,0.00066286983,0.0007263273,0.07711904,0.007726115,0.0143661015,0.0042674257,0.0044292356,0.0006596558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021650571,0.00006931008,0.43791467,0.0019093385,0.00021940906,0.00023132816,0.024597874,0.00044148465,0.0014505949,0.0482379,0.01863142,0.46608007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017749408,0.000199446,0.72494334,0.0038305852,0.00017619488,0.0020670989,0.03665004,0.0027612161,0.003394055,0.01634785,0.2093259,0.00028656286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010573356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135803865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96361405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005951171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036349106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41717708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112651886","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.00454.x","title":"Economics research in Canada: a long‐run assessment of journal publications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Economics education; Library science; Applied economics; Political science; Institution; Economics; Positive economics; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Higher education; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8324857209259421,"score_gpt":0.44002664201038705,"score_spread":0.39245907891555504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112651886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91251093,0.017575063,0.0005723423,0.0065076775,0.00016890164,0.000067419336,0.039259292,0.00016709186,0.023171157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98240536,0.0050059464,0.0004416925,0.00020073849,0.00008448147,0.000027314092,0.0075970953,0.000023746336,0.0042137033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209094,0.00035057138,0.0005181673,0.0005480361,0.0053802333,0.0011121379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9215333,0.006445482,0.0155166425,0.0011012952,0.04711132,0.008291976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036426398,0.00045164075,0.0007732596,0.018763313,0.0029911348,0.0066595622,0.0015671463,0.00070554944,0.0023016918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02405306,0.00021041789,0.00070411904,0.051898327,0.0013540399,0.001710287,0.0023109193,0.0008012212,0.0005817764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113558395,0.000032979468,0.9681566,0.00022848621,0.0003107205,0.00034395544,0.0014201482,0.000941892,0.00029456438,0.0012387332,0.005573452,0.021344986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006508919,0.000029276718,0.9877588,0.00010095763,0.00009393788,0.00009393923,0.0014705032,0.0010751174,0.0002278142,0.00020146162,0.008916408,0.000025319907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9424591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95465124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039191347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059195083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2843545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113641312","doi":"10.4033/iee.v1i0.1949","title":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution – A new open-access model dedicated to the rapid release of creativity in peer-review publication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8387108462081876,"score_gpt":0.7197398142690772,"score_spread":0.1189710319391104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113641312","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022339508,0.005145852,0.6216194,0.09530242,0.00390217,0.00039177848,0.0007175106,0.0012914906,0.24928984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6631447,0.006930079,0.23169613,0.00422454,0.004613347,0.0010991183,0.0004778622,0.00051636645,0.087297894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983779,0.0085064415,0.00074309425,0.0020114642,0.0042843544,0.00067566853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94389933,0.030254396,0.003943217,0.0130681945,0.0052823066,0.0035525847],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019535316,0.00066272804,0.0009674471,0.0044356096,0.0036730869,0.016417356,0.0027872582,0.006913381,0.024252914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06597121,0.0007213672,0.0017489876,0.004969033,0.015594946,0.030119726,0.00694014,0.0049167005,0.005156323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019863859,0.000017043756,0.00031357788,0.00005574268,0.000015611393,0.00006491566,0.00035691497,0.0008709421,0.00019076608,0.97773737,0.0039280667,0.016429171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019886007,0.000018463532,0.00019618474,0.000044145672,0.0000102753265,0.00012095137,0.000114588736,0.0029281052,0.00013876654,0.9727155,0.023670439,0.000022729035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010049543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008824752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99721277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031708388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004793267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10331386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114059546","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","title":"How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Publishing; Peer review; Psychology; Prestige; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9005902623703669,"score_gpt":0.5770311754804135,"score_spread":0.3235590868899534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114059546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76414293,0.019201426,0.003551587,0.19589084,0.0022292936,0.00006357844,0.00013752955,0.0000658432,0.014716963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97574854,0.007928668,0.0014154315,0.011135169,0.0019827604,0.000041653493,0.000051171774,0.000056180514,0.0016403672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9059642,0.06056779,0.006710531,0.003993323,0.01892889,0.0038351973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5193699,0.31275246,0.06706544,0.00667051,0.062192153,0.031949475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06539715,0.00032381102,0.0008117909,0.0022448932,0.007854979,0.015789265,0.0016670282,0.0045614955,0.0021091728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22377804,0.00055160624,0.0008430029,0.0033068466,0.0064002844,0.010969765,0.003648671,0.0048456853,0.0006914888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049386796,0.00021835658,0.18458508,0.0023764356,0.00031932327,0.005552162,0.65071326,0.000457312,0.004146651,0.0058511486,0.022630548,0.12265592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042124702,0.0005830117,0.08419913,0.0015725653,0.00016438989,0.005018351,0.7986246,0.00040078792,0.0012758715,0.0061929645,0.10163828,0.0002880122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00297075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048464327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93460286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004147951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008947248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34585732},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2114094964","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022","title":"The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Chart; Impact factor; Prestige; Medical education","score_opus":0.909042114022165,"score_gpt":0.6835457364923802,"score_spread":0.2254963775297848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114094964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4291492,0.038344253,0.1831429,0.009302889,0.003618257,0.0043978747,0.09598843,0.010161394,0.22589487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709577,0.006668104,0.0880861,0.0007415561,0.0025895813,0.003452709,0.017883189,0.0009721447,0.008648887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95828354,0.010784159,0.007036559,0.001991774,0.021222716,0.0006812016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79055816,0.11098415,0.051819466,0.010218592,0.031644706,0.0047748713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034103554,0.0013910567,0.0024082472,0.06770672,0.0011241918,0.0056219017,0.0020298325,0.0016442476,0.013412244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19385897,0.00039815193,0.0027474875,0.047952127,0.00207801,0.009773847,0.0044548754,0.0017065826,0.0051624607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017058578,0.0005198969,0.44548967,0.004190253,0.00382716,0.000302617,0.0018715287,0.0048524397,0.002153748,0.016271602,0.07780922,0.44100606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006800647,0.0028895752,0.7403372,0.0015584975,0.0025276847,0.0025926156,0.0033359996,0.028478052,0.0044415225,0.057244744,0.1552349,0.00067917776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016182908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002471291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026159338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029424601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.180359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114111800","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0035-9","title":"Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Fragmentation (computing); Attribution; Hierarchy; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.2500444637851816,"score_gpt":0.4672281133466309,"score_spread":0.2171836495614493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114111800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475361,0.0067383866,0.0010359904,0.026156383,0.0005376282,0.00001926961,0.003232609,0.00004469892,0.01469892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99177766,0.0022647313,0.0007727471,0.0007043189,0.0004897671,0.000016540442,0.0020760782,0.000033336983,0.0018647241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967338,0.0009906954,0.00036214796,0.00040547297,0.001068943,0.00043901638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96134126,0.013703488,0.0104434425,0.0019044586,0.010428972,0.002178383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01019639,0.00018849364,0.0005553055,0.009608462,0.0008544486,0.0033748464,0.0007018349,0.00084923394,0.0021842332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711905,0.00018399832,0.00038245102,0.016521117,0.0008176305,0.0034825504,0.0011364899,0.0013080125,0.0010979683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027074234,0.000112246074,0.831085,0.00026740748,0.00043007632,0.00011655904,0.0028068558,0.0008008785,0.000300427,0.006915276,0.035761002,0.121133566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016790073,0.000044371114,0.9710269,0.0001660028,0.00010221831,0.00012614588,0.0036652964,0.0010081565,0.0003701426,0.0027910736,0.020646878,0.000036131438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02366875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037274227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014728892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019191416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053924322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114412364","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060361","title":"A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-2003","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Bibliometrics; Epidemiology; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Productivity; Population; Public health; Medicine; Library science; Demography; Environmental health; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Pathology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.17050704488506438,"score_gpt":0.46847860204473923,"score_spread":0.2979715571596748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114412364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.887372,0.017478438,0.00074725517,0.00089688326,0.00006924911,0.00016125641,0.08154986,0.0002470954,0.01147785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555627,0.007567042,0.0012712675,0.000087740205,0.0001706362,0.00019347071,0.034094397,0.000041249958,0.0010113714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248064,0.0008989213,0.002144728,0.0006449167,0.0034642112,0.00036653117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630061,0.010980869,0.014785438,0.001146928,0.009236383,0.0008442681],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00522718,0.00044124472,0.0012436451,0.09711546,0.00082015514,0.0027302539,0.0008429002,0.00035806556,0.001557821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026455665,0.00021966666,0.0016590917,0.17820007,0.00046104912,0.0014812357,0.0013829627,0.00029594864,0.00043498425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002951696,0.000046420733,0.94044554,0.0020184545,0.001798203,0.0002809116,0.0009925852,0.0012368371,0.0008608172,0.00074747234,0.0067426343,0.044534888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012490596,0.000035540073,0.9925914,0.00009564938,0.00027294215,0.00020232973,0.00055508333,0.0005151708,0.00020783006,0.000120639976,0.005376265,0.000014646781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044706035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041401472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033109465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002765854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088891685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115701185","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x","title":"History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Factor (programming language); Data science; Library science; Operations research; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6874658205142047,"score_gpt":0.5792682361347077,"score_spread":0.108197584379497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115701185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.720482,0.022669,0.026952658,0.022020904,0.0011592297,0.00021859533,0.0037361982,0.00073413487,0.2020273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914725,0.0025291238,0.0026912228,0.00038642946,0.0004225475,0.000026280772,0.00034953616,0.00008777794,0.0020345242],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631894,0.00080362556,0.00031620244,0.0009576237,0.001228546,0.00037503443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9078028,0.054217458,0.008898347,0.005080088,0.01909037,0.0049109454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010166629,0.00048219317,0.0007389178,0.011676902,0.0024219838,0.008120441,0.0010664713,0.0018638481,0.0132419625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060715478,0.000786726,0.00057230244,0.010863333,0.0037702052,0.0070627183,0.0021600185,0.0032825228,0.0015720938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013542036,0.0008155848,0.3313777,0.0011318864,0.00046383793,0.0009617832,0.0025267121,0.010773238,0.0071181944,0.25715804,0.015305559,0.37101328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081218684,0.0006939868,0.7153301,0.00076080166,0.00031789503,0.0012424989,0.0035082041,0.013314073,0.008931994,0.17053881,0.08482043,0.0004600038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057943873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050260834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98983335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004089085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019210185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053766906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115743893","doi":"10.1134/s1810232815010075","title":"Top cited articles in thermodynamic research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Citation; Library science; Web of science; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6925626386382536,"score_gpt":0.5766574159429673,"score_spread":0.11590522269528636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115743893","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17916383,0.5652083,0.0055360305,0.0035686388,0.00794995,0.0006204875,0.10367288,0.0014006365,0.13287923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.552242,0.29661816,0.012781757,0.0016173902,0.0062792236,0.0005851543,0.072477676,0.0006488574,0.05674984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559325,0.00040025325,0.0006956697,0.000526058,0.002327495,0.00045713957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941671,0.0017261703,0.0010858336,0.00020104837,0.0022869504,0.0005328382],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025283862,0.00096578675,0.0014430288,0.045632873,0.0018204855,0.005077136,0.000785225,0.0007435169,0.023465622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009997819,0.00030081905,0.0012857321,0.0651419,0.00060303253,0.0021404813,0.0016238944,0.0005722356,0.009778708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009325157,0.0002626901,0.09327431,0.044577237,0.0010312523,0.0042126686,0.0026732418,0.0013470663,0.0113904765,0.015678491,0.18800357,0.6366166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000620979,0.0002067265,0.13566406,0.007728688,0.0011792268,0.0061574387,0.002390002,0.0018090704,0.006142439,0.007980966,0.8305555,0.00012379393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026866882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005390404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018884958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041992976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07850039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116637846","doi":"10.12927/hcq..17051","title":"CIHR Research: Re-Inventing the Microscope: The Canadian Light Source (CLS)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Light Source (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"CLs upper limits; Microscope; Optometry; Political science; Medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.6957410268992016,"score_gpt":0.6106040493027894,"score_spread":0.08513697759641214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116637846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009657431,0.043411423,0.10215435,0.6202504,0.027525168,0.0008205129,0.002692381,0.0050953687,0.18839295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13528451,0.054678507,0.4295195,0.1246302,0.009783815,0.00068533304,0.002370521,0.004105112,0.23894249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659294,0.005724205,0.00089522713,0.0015994667,0.023509866,0.0023418015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89930737,0.008378676,0.0017107234,0.006743958,0.07347478,0.0103845205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044708245,0.0011094433,0.0009794916,0.012817388,0.0089509655,0.011268406,0.005047377,0.0058595994,0.023378357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052241597,0.0009202014,0.0010978936,0.010461274,0.014290523,0.008149127,0.0071191876,0.008610214,0.005728332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094584335,0.000057182253,0.0017629862,0.0004695816,0.000027380409,0.00010370497,0.0009361426,0.0005549887,0.0028170894,0.10881015,0.5757099,0.30865636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033176028,0.00004059276,0.0027874692,0.00040773154,0.000024098606,0.00010522677,0.00084049295,0.00082909747,0.0022371951,0.022343637,0.9702298,0.00012145314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8814328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92395085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08739673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20291048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6341107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117442262","doi":"10.1093/carcin/bgm129","title":"A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in cancer molecular epidemiology","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carcinogenesis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epidemiology; Population; Ranking (information retrieval); European union; Medicine; Geography; Demography; Environmental health; Pathology; Business; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.5861870334913493,"score_gpt":0.582801078536854,"score_spread":0.0033859549544952294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117442262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69130343,0.1489587,0.020393623,0.0057292124,0.0008728972,0.0034934955,0.08064926,0.001542151,0.04705728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308284,0.028062806,0.017662302,0.0002239571,0.00089974556,0.0022473785,0.018715622,0.0001260457,0.0012338352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.945336,0.018440777,0.01192877,0.0026953467,0.020639027,0.00096010824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7858784,0.15741572,0.028474566,0.0058372254,0.020983543,0.0014105053],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03225854,0.0013184381,0.0040282765,0.2177074,0.0013827619,0.0075985743,0.0016192079,0.0011274462,0.0043980684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18399665,0.00043295516,0.0050310767,0.28129154,0.0015823389,0.0054362994,0.0033884514,0.0006709321,0.0008375515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012620521,0.0003180331,0.6041561,0.034924243,0.011547818,0.0007401971,0.0031065964,0.0058780583,0.001436553,0.0054247687,0.01344427,0.31776133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039721117,0.0008335894,0.9179788,0.0049428996,0.0076197227,0.0023687177,0.00524447,0.013560875,0.0014305488,0.009704163,0.035670664,0.0002482924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035941731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019696914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7822926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003954911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005698116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17060149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117743583","doi":"10.3390/publications3010001","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.9376723983932759,"score_gpt":0.7260669036513111,"score_spread":0.21160549474196477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117743583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4233052,0.01194736,0.0027746896,0.014633683,0.0009912726,0.00092025794,0.3759327,0.0011532481,0.16834152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6639283,0.016057301,0.0074109887,0.0071787448,0.0026763768,0.0012933526,0.1847384,0.0008494937,0.11586708],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823256,0.0020797446,0.0029405279,0.0010827987,0.010716359,0.00085485814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8841235,0.02761462,0.042058382,0.0025181875,0.036240414,0.0074448516],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071049943,0.0003053961,0.00051013124,0.015661862,0.0010088936,0.0036498986,0.0013905347,0.000785913,0.025304869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055481907,0.0003237283,0.0005106241,0.031900387,0.0004673423,0.00305835,0.0016523147,0.0010514957,0.01520707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611005,0.00025290763,0.47294077,0.0015371542,0.00014544264,0.00019781612,0.0007764145,0.00020082992,0.00090783957,0.0026270023,0.3749623,0.14499041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003360005,0.00011595804,0.6944634,0.0002355971,0.00004591527,0.0005147352,0.0008368231,0.0002929063,0.00049907353,0.00037020078,0.30253014,0.000061645376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008217439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009073121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002848326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028435262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08465326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118089643","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.101","title":"Improving the International Influence of Chinese Academic Journals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Business; Public relations; International trade; Law","score_opus":0.39091432082969024,"score_gpt":0.5287340650515185,"score_spread":0.1378197442218283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118089643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8209587,0.00823032,0.0050964146,0.0069330106,0.0007041041,0.00013115363,0.00025139804,0.00024120384,0.15745366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907957,0.0025776878,0.0021603783,0.0002988356,0.0004837668,0.000032304943,0.00014753744,0.00003047547,0.0034733592],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652463,0.0008061236,0.00034380963,0.00029393125,0.0016001537,0.00043135232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985978,0.0026933872,0.0019851525,0.0006311127,0.007045515,0.0016668823],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059480406,0.0006272918,0.0008200395,0.0075203977,0.0016664712,0.0051474385,0.0006786266,0.0005044677,0.003449207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019691145,0.00014357317,0.00050493696,0.0074867294,0.00078751135,0.0023023272,0.0019076639,0.00047131497,0.0006097206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046401192,0.00038788395,0.2221794,0.0011650465,0.00055364834,0.0011053643,0.007762959,0.009613262,0.018458016,0.044097915,0.021520384,0.6726922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002453875,0.0008928178,0.7588322,0.00048100235,0.0016274538,0.0007277274,0.0065091415,0.021776361,0.029211642,0.025255036,0.15426122,0.00018005758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009259427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009692526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99485254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029933965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045709885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03145659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119312080","doi":"10.1002/smj.508","title":"Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Licensee; Exploit; License; Commercialization; Incentive; Sample (material); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.6182492280077356,"score_gpt":0.485778950588266,"score_spread":0.13247027741946965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119312080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99322456,0.00028848174,0.0027834845,0.00041056713,0.0000020754755,0.00003662234,0.00005524774,0.000008535513,0.0031905079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931264,0.000076206095,0.00025812245,0.00001345899,0.00000419503,0.000012477387,0.000026051524,0.0000014944437,0.00029544285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345267,0.0036336642,0.00044829256,0.00060011033,0.0010614952,0.0008037758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79912907,0.16206437,0.028706498,0.0039483956,0.002914092,0.0032375357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010448517,0.00023065071,0.00075097743,0.0039049513,0.0012991911,0.007040542,0.00119433,0.0016159874,0.0067305784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0803293,0.00022725432,0.00062500825,0.003965218,0.0026810837,0.0063986867,0.0031227653,0.001697913,0.00047820676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005180626,0.0013330852,0.8944558,0.00018627288,0.00025824556,0.0006949946,0.008570265,0.0057817074,0.0010163081,0.027852593,0.0004086243,0.058924016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025640536,0.0010283431,0.76609015,0.00029436545,0.00060130976,0.0008953882,0.04529641,0.09038404,0.003964376,0.085655116,0.0053900704,0.00014407623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004295205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004695082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002393905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002065882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055257678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119342649","doi":"10.1002/asi.23347","title":"A lead‐lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Popularity; Lag; Time lag; Computer science; Regression analysis; Data science; Information retrieval; Machine learning; Psychology","score_opus":0.3331102629529904,"score_gpt":0.5118160362094799,"score_spread":0.1787057732564895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119342649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641706,0.0004443524,0.030802794,0.00033658228,0.000050130915,0.00007630475,0.0015361528,0.000332403,0.002250754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353105,0.00012528256,0.0032499172,0.000017079887,0.00003411327,0.000054820546,0.0014697548,0.00004827328,0.0014698193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986143,0.0004212765,0.00011326923,0.00032904444,0.0003177008,0.0002044401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884936,0.0069271876,0.0017130531,0.00083542214,0.0015015745,0.0005291647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044581527,0.00040640763,0.00042820335,0.005757489,0.00056134124,0.0015164778,0.0004705319,0.00047996631,0.00360467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017142724,0.00024195909,0.0010058144,0.0045797015,0.00038605678,0.0017749547,0.00095091923,0.00090842566,0.0016010313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049814483,0.00028313874,0.8799138,0.00019630186,0.00030359987,0.0003084765,0.0021575554,0.014075464,0.0061880914,0.0063015553,0.0025208483,0.08725306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004476515,0.00042664216,0.7141238,0.00004776382,0.00021654995,0.00041530767,0.002075954,0.26145616,0.0036631117,0.009279479,0.0081648985,0.00008554378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070074643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056074355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079475803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008100704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023577273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119582208","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408","title":"New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; World Wide Web; Promotion (chess); Social media; Download; Audience measurement; Relevance (law); Metadata; Webometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Business; Advertising; Political science","score_opus":0.27997722570051914,"score_gpt":0.4548905511283122,"score_spread":0.1749133254277931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119582208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004528648,0.024657793,0.033570513,0.86908317,0.02308798,0.00010189935,0.00091428874,0.003474693,0.040580947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22413738,0.08490602,0.24694893,0.14365724,0.19178173,0.00112055,0.003856531,0.007521555,0.09607009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9271508,0.037726384,0.0072207013,0.0030181608,0.022335116,0.0025488862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.662774,0.1474093,0.024571512,0.045672715,0.09887739,0.020695066],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12896304,0.0014028075,0.0016571388,0.022739422,0.007028775,0.053969573,0.0051009315,0.009153118,0.02916253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25348964,0.0011273458,0.0016165014,0.029120712,0.014251034,0.1117466,0.018123258,0.0103392275,0.012950141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007166312,0.00005395196,0.002743663,0.0005009923,0.000025748897,0.00020054764,0.0027413063,0.00038641016,0.00022675493,0.28930873,0.45923752,0.24450271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011302812,0.000029309516,0.0009424294,0.0005952813,0.000012089842,0.00021278633,0.0018461323,0.0006850274,0.00019556616,0.0786065,0.9167927,0.00007098294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002977019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042797974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006698528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014112512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68202984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120346313","doi":"","title":"Issues and challenges to development of institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Elpub digital library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Institutional repository; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Open research; World Wide Web; Public relations; Knowledge management; Institutional research; Political science; Library science; Higher education; Publishing","score_opus":0.7150055971970769,"score_gpt":0.5527936526054816,"score_spread":0.16221194459159527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120346313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43978187,0.023117503,0.020353204,0.39679366,0.0014390444,0.002377363,0.0006731132,0.0010073129,0.114456944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95046496,0.0059511987,0.024768224,0.0041493317,0.00029580007,0.0005194697,0.00030019786,0.0001270455,0.013423722],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.946517,0.032344263,0.0054775933,0.0020462864,0.006243018,0.007371874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76600355,0.080502845,0.03478563,0.015537606,0.055073693,0.048096757],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07923036,0.00042575307,0.00082294917,0.008479793,0.014849055,0.037911553,0.0065173996,0.005761418,0.012461976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14706455,0.0010816519,0.0008203576,0.009792015,0.008895739,0.032367203,0.018944995,0.0036663918,0.0018827172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003546343,0.0010751954,0.1737792,0.00241688,0.00012209124,0.003016199,0.037549645,0.0023726935,0.0007326886,0.3289803,0.04415967,0.4054409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002744517,0.00079602294,0.11995734,0.01145043,0.00023354783,0.0044395975,0.3428751,0.0067539006,0.0021925431,0.06642309,0.44420245,0.00040157195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02160242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028941011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96208847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01531291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08251141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41901523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120479835","doi":"10.5860/crln.69.8.8047","title":"Open access and evolving scholarly communication: An overview of library advocacy and commitment, institutional repositories, and publishing in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Strong","keywords":"Mandate; Library science; Publishing; Political science; Scholarly communication; Open access publishing; Best practice; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7746639874194271,"score_gpt":0.5715284349985625,"score_spread":0.20313555242086456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120479835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25690645,0.22583702,0.0019233287,0.18294187,0.0010628662,0.00036513072,0.0018577287,0.00020164982,0.32890397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85892457,0.109513044,0.0020835013,0.0037059633,0.00027734984,0.000101556994,0.000449988,0.00008468993,0.024859253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820318,0.0020812454,0.00096537266,0.00080665905,0.009717817,0.004397087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954577,0.011250888,0.004265762,0.0010306942,0.018218825,0.010656811],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010010314,0.00043640097,0.0008069986,0.016351959,0.023320291,0.023600414,0.003311565,0.0024216117,0.010993738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028977523,0.00048531283,0.0005179131,0.05746734,0.01464373,0.0074447286,0.0073647103,0.0027102977,0.000490118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020311204,0.0002162069,0.07327501,0.0024031398,0.00010172928,0.0013261467,0.13736276,0.00079966924,0.00031629743,0.2461741,0.05792977,0.47989222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054491873,0.00006618938,0.19113919,0.0034916399,0.0001368116,0.00067542796,0.22726673,0.0011984721,0.0005270044,0.024960367,0.55020237,0.00028124492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99428385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2438191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42747754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8770627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122566942","doi":"","title":"Biomedical scientific publication patterns in the Scopus database: a case study of Andalusia, Spain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Canadian Institute of Steel Construction","keywords":"Scopus; Biomedicine; Citation database; Citation; Visibility; MEDLINE; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; Biology; Bioinformatics; Law","score_opus":0.30993306132092124,"score_gpt":0.4466405571512866,"score_spread":0.13670749583036534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122566942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98567504,0.004143955,0.00022002263,0.00044627066,0.00001959567,0.000054941174,0.005009495,0.000036024772,0.0043946756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913118,0.0026781296,0.00050666067,0.000060967366,0.0000251377,0.000056958383,0.0045726425,0.00002199366,0.0007656052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535453,0.0009976355,0.0012076573,0.00053627277,0.0012723269,0.0006315515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97557735,0.011648935,0.006646352,0.0009965796,0.004304397,0.0008264288],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004920019,0.0004052532,0.0011434746,0.028442087,0.00080418703,0.0047942773,0.0011991091,0.00090142107,0.0019643866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023346474,0.00017442172,0.0006275429,0.077889085,0.0005840453,0.0011980286,0.0017987322,0.00025459053,0.0003681921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051739864,0.00014156538,0.9402989,0.0013331949,0.0002944242,0.005086781,0.0047383658,0.00092989934,0.00042950426,0.00075759244,0.0028550723,0.042617243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004772027,0.000082917686,0.97791356,0.00040143152,0.00018251454,0.0020017775,0.012105148,0.00084378535,0.0003023637,0.0003109946,0.0057715545,0.000036095837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06759805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04809507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034969521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032608372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13440919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122732631","doi":"10.1002/j.1681-4835.2003.tb00070.x","title":"E‐Publishing in Science and Healthcare: Alternative Models for Development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; SciELO; Publishing; Health care; Library science; Business model; Electronic library; Political science; Scientific publishing; Health science; Center (category theory); MEDLINE; Business; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Digital library; Marketing; Art","score_opus":0.2611843664851838,"score_gpt":0.4703095811214601,"score_spread":0.2091252146362763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122732631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037526845,0.030154759,0.047485832,0.7186523,0.0063555944,0.00020970302,0.0002491103,0.00010449509,0.19303548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.745252,0.0761885,0.060786296,0.06332957,0.016379328,0.0022643676,0.0002384913,0.00018603163,0.035375435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95474684,0.035921194,0.0011465278,0.0015719606,0.0055358987,0.0010775599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8990068,0.08366472,0.003436994,0.003267402,0.009018861,0.0016053043],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026661118,0.0014841309,0.001604762,0.008331802,0.0032521235,0.023873644,0.004488849,0.012432411,0.0140583655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052834824,0.0005496251,0.0012411311,0.009604348,0.029980723,0.028304504,0.006982878,0.0072830557,0.0024492363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116652955,0.0000083164505,0.000053039497,0.00014423653,0.000007690073,0.000028192768,0.00039999676,0.00032093827,0.0000047702188,0.9899913,0.005061518,0.0039683306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029251672,0.000023637434,0.00013235086,0.0007394106,0.0000137287725,0.000072359726,0.0017385532,0.0031195611,0.000038199832,0.9233221,0.07074714,0.000023796416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005723684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005837002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148715135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010397932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14099914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123012798","doi":"10.1123/jsep.25.4.477","title":"Publishing Productivity in Sport Psychology 1970–2000: An Exploratory Examination of the Lotka-Price Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Productivity; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sport psychology; Social science; Sports science; Applied psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.3202027184087833,"score_gpt":0.5006045020388501,"score_spread":0.18040178363006681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123012798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760656,0.0036405378,0.005615452,0.0013474411,0.00003927364,0.00012835595,0.00056638377,0.00006218774,0.012534649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997979,0.0005152549,0.00066579744,0.000069189635,0.000069585345,0.000048607,0.0002828514,0.000014330513,0.00035538993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818631,0.0037847366,0.0022135265,0.0018315356,0.009424378,0.0008828242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6144162,0.29401967,0.06434965,0.007712073,0.015557644,0.0039447816],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019327065,0.00020328524,0.0010460991,0.018646076,0.0014464215,0.0051720203,0.0016389429,0.001006788,0.0032565144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20014243,0.00031045004,0.0009671818,0.02546574,0.004470217,0.007768581,0.0027160095,0.0012250878,0.0006515473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053615676,0.00019519625,0.9345438,0.00027825014,0.00028953722,0.00059665344,0.0038526074,0.0018297686,0.00044458985,0.014816164,0.0010465609,0.0415707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006085684,0.0003149388,0.97281724,0.00009627918,0.000094679184,0.0010431221,0.003129465,0.008319633,0.00043190835,0.010549964,0.0030863597,0.00005548053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038399475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020890296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98135394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027846752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023270394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10221249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126151227","doi":"10.18438/b81s5w","title":"UK Library and Information Science Research is Having a Significant Influence on Research in Other Subject Disciplines","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Citation; Web of science; Information science; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Impact factor; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.3798485392327241,"score_gpt":0.5452735359162998,"score_spread":0.1654249966835757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126151227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40228945,0.11463447,0.0023480756,0.068510845,0.0028531107,0.00020274974,0.01083617,0.0004720738,0.39785305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313407,0.036104307,0.0023723932,0.0052942745,0.0021715187,0.000105853425,0.002853406,0.00019549018,0.01956208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93910414,0.020442234,0.006899246,0.0039516813,0.02729371,0.00230894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68178105,0.14662899,0.09332215,0.016865222,0.04991426,0.011488339],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016220106,0.00052218203,0.0016725837,0.0150826555,0.0023942182,0.017925436,0.0008170658,0.0019458437,0.030373998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10562404,0.00049956026,0.0009152592,0.05529472,0.004323742,0.009702921,0.005615751,0.0012231126,0.009094335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009066997,0.0002304664,0.51828426,0.013029255,0.0012495926,0.0016560121,0.006137085,0.00089433184,0.003568715,0.022557294,0.062444404,0.3690419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005210133,0.00027470334,0.7464219,0.0037905702,0.00035524246,0.0010575558,0.005153017,0.00020532384,0.0015807528,0.0028052735,0.2382168,0.00008676763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020819027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032216076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98491734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008652616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122578265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10161114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126151262","doi":"10.1002/asi.23239","title":"How is research blogged? A content analysis approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Content analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Multidisciplinary approach; Value (mathematics); Sample (material); Visibility; Social media; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.5321372389782696,"score_gpt":0.5357945287418109,"score_spread":0.0036572897635412938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126151262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81716347,0.002754634,0.11878072,0.0032989238,0.00023208502,0.007604744,0.016831364,0.00077405584,0.03255996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80798495,0.0014372964,0.17240492,0.00045793178,0.00019521492,0.0075324494,0.0058688656,0.00018214279,0.003936234],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811454,0.006285307,0.0014920979,0.0014537568,0.0021622803,0.0004920785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087761,0.07480387,0.0069653555,0.0028271151,0.0058336253,0.00079388503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017049192,0.0008923078,0.0011979247,0.040643856,0.0020982877,0.0077208895,0.0012900616,0.001221478,0.0030492942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04573994,0.0005937998,0.0011406896,0.03714052,0.0030392262,0.006668663,0.0028543319,0.0011617999,0.0005831481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008062314,0.00079739495,0.26105103,0.0060922843,0.0009183852,0.0010299876,0.13506266,0.0021865247,0.011207295,0.038486492,0.009384031,0.53297776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021022036,0.0009236782,0.49818185,0.004751316,0.001287423,0.001969466,0.2431146,0.052128628,0.0088091735,0.07497326,0.113154985,0.0004953929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032336246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031180335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040963194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002764339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09016585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126658398","doi":"10.5539/mas.v8n5p63","title":"Equality of Google Scholar with Web of Science Citations: Case of Malaysian Engineering Highly Cited Papers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Funding Agency; Web of science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Library science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.21761586769838356,"score_gpt":0.45915199111031924,"score_spread":0.24153612341193567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126658398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871335,0.0009881068,0.0009848037,0.00057591504,0.000014829164,0.000020217884,0.00014540726,0.000012515044,0.010124834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918,0.00014334664,0.0002738334,0.00000944313,0.0000128900065,0.0000051988527,0.000046256122,0.0000034720124,0.00032551808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902344,0.0038379056,0.0007058534,0.00089049584,0.0031579568,0.0011733372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043525,0.07591221,0.010087279,0.0025434631,0.0056758644,0.0014287046],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009739042,0.00030511728,0.0008780144,0.009321234,0.0015678888,0.0051629357,0.0012917091,0.0013269641,0.0034146039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065770656,0.0002210386,0.0009739389,0.018482747,0.0020371976,0.0034629889,0.0025141228,0.000940619,0.00044201742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042642062,0.00029054633,0.91391355,0.00036097248,0.00027266023,0.0058471155,0.0037772506,0.007885958,0.00049086,0.031156965,0.000909692,0.03466795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083973464,0.00040390107,0.84561014,0.00041898372,0.0007204512,0.0061598253,0.021149153,0.08618609,0.0038394977,0.027752489,0.00752246,0.00015312471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027263723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012319293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032378526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023184083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054210067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126660889","doi":"10.5072/prism/29774","title":"Open Access for the Australian Medical Librarian","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hispana","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Library science; Open access journal; Political science; Public access; Open access publishing; Public relations; Medical research; Business; Medicine; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.9082844322064981,"score_gpt":0.6852591581362585,"score_spread":0.22302527407023964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126660889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044303657,0.01481118,0.005594712,0.39237154,0.018250156,0.00066291826,0.003149348,0.001785091,0.5589447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04373743,0.011727185,0.015193974,0.08253792,0.0057548294,0.0005899172,0.001995467,0.00079544814,0.8376679],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98173726,0.0066330484,0.0014980979,0.001102865,0.0073222215,0.001706428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270351,0.011423678,0.003237613,0.015682217,0.020705285,0.021916136],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014306006,0.00041429044,0.0009466413,0.003637523,0.00537516,0.01276526,0.0019152772,0.005058894,0.22865033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07179222,0.00052457134,0.0007407121,0.007102297,0.004795158,0.009982985,0.010527511,0.003956813,0.09828549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048446116,0.0000596841,0.0009260206,0.0005502223,0.000009787612,0.00016241513,0.00092639506,0.000019512867,0.0002867548,0.024427071,0.79718006,0.17540368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044157455,0.0000186781,0.0017943282,0.00021962378,0.0000032395571,0.00015376035,0.00036118532,0.000042746644,0.00006583274,0.003410903,0.993915,0.000010350698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00856443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016087575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052491794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026189335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76491153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126698449","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a195","title":"Introduction: \"Building Partnerships to Transform Scholarly Publishing\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6966302690756938,"score_gpt":0.5823378936665247,"score_spread":0.11429237540916914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126698449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016094635,0.017472848,0.00501039,0.6532972,0.075183704,0.00057238,0.0026003676,0.0008863331,0.24336737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02467804,0.028560009,0.008797976,0.28605336,0.024343923,0.0006987801,0.0026558137,0.00070104963,0.6235111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742645,0.00061180873,0.000093096955,0.00029056464,0.0011471304,0.0004308974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615794,0.0007268167,0.00017663979,0.00014307127,0.0012966,0.0014989116],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003066924,0.00073888473,0.00032515483,0.0010340352,0.006058472,0.008407994,0.0013957708,0.005555338,0.063057266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060606664,0.00045203825,0.00052160845,0.0018198522,0.0029513822,0.005045869,0.0042549586,0.0071882387,0.02271873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073596475,0.000012743865,0.00007581,0.000099948076,9.688176e-7,0.000024423422,0.00040673657,0.000019600082,0.000077735334,0.010822002,0.9760394,0.012413162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006069722,0.000009812326,0.0004188276,0.00023128015,0.0000014069087,0.00003619984,0.00051625294,0.000019352166,0.0000677992,0.0025350603,0.9961506,0.000007395419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035865285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10882672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062759602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012564079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21094757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127540269","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2","title":"Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Personalization; Scientometrics; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.4692757887462023,"score_gpt":0.5425769812812546,"score_spread":0.07330119253505235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127540269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2718603,0.14222394,0.06394572,0.4276739,0.018957138,0.00034921552,0.0031858918,0.002003183,0.06980084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82734704,0.037162565,0.07833862,0.035051633,0.011839968,0.00026691833,0.0014073879,0.0012114048,0.007374449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94985956,0.018371224,0.005009729,0.005028661,0.02045392,0.0012769005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6821865,0.19493437,0.02108206,0.011816748,0.083454035,0.0065262816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044639222,0.0009750396,0.0030382886,0.014005154,0.0031341757,0.013309203,0.003070371,0.004329376,0.0031578375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30654776,0.0005685195,0.0011403211,0.032444213,0.0040208604,0.015744356,0.0024783209,0.0046468233,0.00315547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004321421,0.0002790537,0.11493824,0.006742839,0.0016568283,0.00019328459,0.004546904,0.0011878429,0.0030406776,0.057357326,0.16722855,0.64239645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003450229,0.0005514129,0.21506727,0.015742363,0.0024084805,0.002171978,0.019570133,0.0146549465,0.011942394,0.35167378,0.36510548,0.0007667359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016600775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025934778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031381575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006543644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23607755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128918317","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1110.1470","title":"Reconceptualizing Stars: Scientist Helpfulness and Peer Performance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; University of Toronto","keywords":"Helpfulness; Productivity; Receipt; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Entrepreneurship; Sociology; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5017412632498177,"score_gpt":0.5394137518965617,"score_spread":0.037672488646743996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128918317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96484005,0.0011944416,0.008644135,0.005142685,0.00012757134,0.00005496789,0.00009104055,0.000053798765,0.019851271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980617,0.0001846805,0.0010760156,0.000095352196,0.00010504739,0.000015334346,0.000037589638,0.000007597483,0.00041664517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892336,0.005778703,0.00069868844,0.0007975628,0.002800757,0.00069066737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88499826,0.05556414,0.0324381,0.006194268,0.012786849,0.008018474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018389279,0.0003904231,0.00074292865,0.0052703354,0.0013676931,0.004544668,0.00083995995,0.00093181303,0.0016570828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08468614,0.00015963374,0.00040635263,0.0047164904,0.005242434,0.007335004,0.0052565043,0.0014227899,0.0003467445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063709094,0.0003768165,0.7478325,0.0003866515,0.0003620959,0.00029453967,0.031206692,0.0051405635,0.0024746698,0.07960935,0.0030843113,0.12859482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007493024,0.00090895494,0.7718695,0.00021147152,0.00017495462,0.0003903823,0.028029904,0.016473873,0.0027949656,0.1689998,0.009947692,0.00012357632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071655086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093709544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99472964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013728903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001506558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097253025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128959152","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0000","title":"Surviving Referees' Reports","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Media studies; Sociology; Slavic languages; Social science; History; Library science; Classics; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.7110167972722886,"score_gpt":0.5385857244027762,"score_spread":0.17243107286951243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128959152","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014574297,0.016920524,0.0050605615,0.06445295,0.64239764,0.0029489307,0.049624506,0.006605789,0.21053165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007758802,0.010368397,0.0055196937,0.014538315,0.07187975,0.0029324433,0.02739009,0.0035711885,0.8560414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719017,0.003660283,0.0038398982,0.0018429165,0.016679266,0.0020759096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7639281,0.021965062,0.0073359506,0.019945461,0.17580959,0.011015907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025786458,0.0019560978,0.0022289972,0.020600885,0.00612163,0.02172257,0.0053001605,0.0066658203,0.49532348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13916966,0.0012064179,0.0029551268,0.017296886,0.0011025964,0.0061366553,0.0061249114,0.0041331984,0.3799452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023957722,0.000015497948,0.00007602133,0.0002877257,0.000007168205,0.00007781833,0.00004178803,0.000013384423,0.00007083541,0.0005200726,0.98096555,0.017900223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009662795,0.000013227806,0.000308802,0.00026292625,0.000008423491,0.000046822417,0.00008927395,0.000028215685,0.000097157004,0.0004130892,0.9987098,0.000012587933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007358727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011055527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97421354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049463827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014921201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71985984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129049984","doi":"10.18438/b88609","title":"For Non-expert Clinical Searches, Google Scholar Results are Older with Higher Impact while PubMed Results Offer More Breadth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Scopus; Information retrieval; Quality (philosophy); Statistic; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Computer science; Cohen's kappa; Medicine; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3827512911107469,"score_gpt":0.5158131576038543,"score_spread":0.13306186649310736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129049984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30089143,0.17914999,0.05875109,0.064260066,0.008031211,0.012690613,0.06585513,0.004651459,0.30571902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7474063,0.052956827,0.13348512,0.015573108,0.006301064,0.0064458,0.022523483,0.0021645452,0.01314372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.76643145,0.084292576,0.07293317,0.009400226,0.063805684,0.0031368888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3053271,0.47837207,0.11793787,0.026901782,0.06807809,0.0033830306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120705985,0.0013887793,0.004640729,0.07060774,0.0018000809,0.017191665,0.0020859186,0.0030191864,0.041456617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4994392,0.000917581,0.004025913,0.06958384,0.0037405167,0.019936282,0.00782979,0.0021005485,0.015120677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027823185,0.00058082526,0.12627716,0.17848061,0.006518731,0.0011737611,0.01172673,0.0006078122,0.0063036536,0.014056486,0.05679853,0.5946934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010472691,0.0018285022,0.5685199,0.08801214,0.0074913045,0.0066172094,0.030747171,0.0015736928,0.006699816,0.041997783,0.24445339,0.0010118017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015704698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005378284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035290231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006092643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63836193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129137558","doi":"10.1186/s40463-014-0047-1","title":"The Canadian contribution to the otolaryngology literature: A five year bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Stornoway Diamond (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Otorhinolaryngology; Bibliometrics; Regional science; Library science; Geography; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.11073153825420616,"score_gpt":0.4180188855901482,"score_spread":0.30728734733594204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129137558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7597163,0.11980597,0.0013248712,0.006463523,0.0004954604,0.00045979666,0.07764797,0.00024676992,0.03383926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559812,0.027494324,0.0021827174,0.00016356287,0.00019819818,0.00012704406,0.012174393,0.000031261327,0.0016472943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733157,0.0007341567,0.0015108698,0.0007239833,0.008854628,0.00084478396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95286345,0.0064401166,0.010505694,0.0008264342,0.02676258,0.0026017232],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009747208,0.00065266725,0.0013236293,0.111227676,0.003112254,0.0057834485,0.0013190103,0.00064336974,0.0031033475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050072853,0.00030435057,0.0020680202,0.15679479,0.0009197807,0.001731819,0.0025597105,0.0004529838,0.000459763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004567564,0.00004103021,0.85766035,0.008343874,0.0018965042,0.00067331234,0.0038753287,0.0011095101,0.00059977337,0.0021788676,0.014426777,0.10873793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018138413,0.000053904547,0.9722124,0.001064411,0.00079256203,0.00037070547,0.0020099464,0.0006755029,0.00019235781,0.0002046791,0.022362119,0.000043137214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7443822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76029986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03170279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056240067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51424634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129275633","doi":"10.22230/ijepl.2009v4n3a164","title":"A Quantitative Analysis of Countries’ Research Strengths","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Conceptual framework; Comparative research; Scarcity; Field (mathematics); Regional science; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.84298480473564,"score_gpt":0.7047405077329202,"score_spread":0.13824429700271978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129275633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90706503,0.001491278,0.014320692,0.0010333052,0.00007181196,0.000770434,0.0056204502,0.0001072179,0.069519825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873225,0.00043454114,0.009744638,0.00005828819,0.00004115112,0.00071856944,0.00095379684,0.000021593822,0.00070484576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96551335,0.016586374,0.0061862865,0.0020704062,0.008642206,0.0010012761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8063173,0.10711642,0.03967801,0.012035443,0.031849414,0.0030033966],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03917856,0.00047358312,0.0010102595,0.029078692,0.0014148658,0.004337682,0.00070583465,0.00043335854,0.0036822995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12029462,0.0004031924,0.00077293033,0.032466065,0.0020216953,0.004261746,0.005181893,0.00058074313,0.00039251166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042978776,0.00011175709,0.78589195,0.0020415152,0.001334528,0.0003731948,0.021477915,0.0035995834,0.0033640927,0.030801997,0.0028098398,0.14776391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007427321,0.0005593363,0.8490038,0.0010365881,0.00060776673,0.0011406917,0.06398521,0.006358028,0.0033576326,0.022635601,0.051039163,0.00020192152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090030854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097125827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020189525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019753473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20719856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129998450","doi":"10.5860/crln.74.9.9009","title":"Making your publications open access: Resources to assist researchers and librarians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.9163693574320282,"score_gpt":0.6759432609013435,"score_spread":0.2404260965306847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129998450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053693987,0.019689327,0.04464079,0.1811758,0.016114496,0.002035692,0.006383163,0.018232828,0.70635855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03261529,0.052942965,0.24630436,0.034692753,0.019485785,0.0032664365,0.012980107,0.00932023,0.588392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865709,0.00463063,0.0012314828,0.00058506,0.0061926893,0.0007893103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9388955,0.018208506,0.004563345,0.009399902,0.011255403,0.017677328],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016441297,0.0014967197,0.0014389319,0.011275724,0.006748358,0.030123634,0.0036755567,0.005450275,0.15249228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084988244,0.0013613396,0.000819618,0.017017297,0.0041244286,0.03554154,0.02393499,0.005330367,0.15909265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016467802,0.00007756634,0.00042071423,0.00035096484,0.000006879245,0.00014160956,0.001187839,0.000056817524,0.00028416616,0.0070838584,0.7077911,0.282582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129452865,0.00001829681,0.00033629165,0.00032787892,0.0000052060836,0.00012823819,0.0012742864,0.000059010974,0.00015545008,0.004639725,0.9930161,0.000026465666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018917359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005465155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017260514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012776654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51013756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130456849","doi":"10.1002/asi.23266","title":"Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":476,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Citation impact; Citation; Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.09452104728685203,"score_gpt":0.4709480457491031,"score_spread":0.3764269984622511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130456849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90519524,0.017729046,0.0017065352,0.0059774937,0.0003237107,0.000021116166,0.00067270023,0.00006277857,0.06831142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949315,0.002863778,0.00024800294,0.00013399965,0.00043632745,0.000008229095,0.00019456937,0.000011675931,0.0011718859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971826,0.0006036033,0.00027273424,0.00048791792,0.0010038669,0.00044933913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604816,0.013666656,0.013257191,0.001207431,0.0045679393,0.006819224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055614426,0.0002814842,0.0004926989,0.0069322344,0.0014384134,0.0040197605,0.00052752794,0.0008852653,0.0040773926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029399078,0.00013801896,0.00040820672,0.0106488075,0.002229501,0.0038853956,0.0031525944,0.001293936,0.0006134108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032292638,0.00020516879,0.771344,0.00055871916,0.00040268002,0.0008898139,0.0134433005,0.0032299245,0.0008641896,0.033355106,0.0058110454,0.16957311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020259537,0.00019617939,0.9540747,0.0002660313,0.0000865975,0.00077165855,0.0041388324,0.000657255,0.00047085137,0.01079746,0.02848604,0.0000341654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031885114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030863276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020082318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014398854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02941209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131590703","doi":"10.1139/juvs-2015-0022","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.843790549603968,"score_gpt":0.6485680902265646,"score_spread":0.19522245937740346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131590703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22983305,0.0076399846,0.10159753,0.12740341,0.008626199,0.00071363174,0.0023159515,0.0040431307,0.5178271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8314523,0.0024021128,0.048769705,0.013268657,0.008234636,0.00048495468,0.0012500212,0.001542184,0.09259544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9352475,0.022490097,0.00580095,0.0055894256,0.026711987,0.0041601504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5490949,0.18187705,0.043153536,0.086355545,0.07272655,0.06679239],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044583946,0.0006529481,0.0014864447,0.014643695,0.0042277616,0.04503585,0.003257917,0.006468164,0.06517291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27768368,0.00081365067,0.001622061,0.0199013,0.004603767,0.042106584,0.020157171,0.0043963105,0.018493105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080343545,0.0010411227,0.05979831,0.0012378356,0.00039493278,0.001141238,0.012120839,0.0015402036,0.0072970134,0.1996982,0.0797542,0.63517267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045321533,0.00035243097,0.022652535,0.00060301105,0.00027285411,0.0019619921,0.013126336,0.003094388,0.0040976824,0.44273978,0.51029104,0.0003546987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009995988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024381797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99674207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033614105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011145228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23578525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132320854","doi":"10.1177/0146167210378111","title":"Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Personality; Citation; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.4917584739567817,"score_gpt":0.5813574088282103,"score_spread":0.08959893487142861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132320854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744932,0.003007221,0.0009571528,0.00039312086,0.000046255253,0.000039487993,0.005316679,0.00007960622,0.015667304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169064,0.0010209712,0.00062550564,0.000017178027,0.00008345568,0.00002124564,0.0037625127,0.000016692395,0.0027617652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973139,0.0005314283,0.00020684715,0.00021924953,0.0014394013,0.00028917432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696652,0.012432817,0.0058741407,0.0013634551,0.007587827,0.0030764607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045742355,0.00024145069,0.0005502572,0.021530144,0.00073683856,0.0020036995,0.00054421223,0.00038297876,0.004711766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032625023,0.00009591976,0.0005114643,0.027849039,0.00049312954,0.0014374617,0.001513669,0.0003771339,0.00071720534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002566168,0.00012977462,0.8943318,0.00026546052,0.00030763957,0.00010536737,0.0011852778,0.0023587332,0.0013052985,0.0036441502,0.00294973,0.09316005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070917854,0.00008416024,0.99239564,0.000024593606,0.000059477465,0.000065179345,0.00053476833,0.001384824,0.00046012635,0.0012506548,0.0037197038,0.000013913011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010414484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02310851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99542576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020027966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021572495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0241912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132406724","doi":"","title":"Amiante et conflits d'intérêts : l'Université McGill pointée du doigt","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07837236158268163,"score_gpt":0.3153571081214496,"score_spread":0.236984746538768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132406724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06505134,0.017969724,0.0028892672,0.8095188,0.015279274,0.0000956745,0.00019595648,0.00018380219,0.08881612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.683793,0.006679917,0.0034777352,0.096669026,0.005862257,0.00021129883,0.00006802643,0.00016274926,0.20307589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639816,0.005605248,0.0005939691,0.00158308,0.003779842,0.0020397468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840428,0.0050779763,0.0015031779,0.00054452085,0.0027659012,0.006065657],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061274376,0.0004694374,0.0005691268,0.0013874526,0.007847624,0.007467768,0.0022231361,0.0074781245,0.035141468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034561124,0.0003904207,0.00043164592,0.0013513827,0.006070504,0.0034031705,0.004893902,0.007393983,0.0028482815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001794004,0.00019286147,0.026160428,0.000429526,0.0000826932,0.09856536,0.044601094,0.000627167,0.0020072463,0.17094883,0.49784076,0.15836458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018403282,0.00005731913,0.0051312433,0.00064389425,0.000020436051,0.040474214,0.022730678,0.0005341751,0.00061054004,0.008492971,0.921196,0.00009025154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06017813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09733113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011762923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014630766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11965573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132478289","doi":"10.5596/c06-025","title":"Open access for the medical librarian","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Open access journal; Library science; Medical library; World Wide Web; Medical journal; Open access publishing; Relevance (law); Point (geometry); Computer science; Institutional repository; Political science; Public relations; Business; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.13510952248644426,"score_gpt":0.4922088215085776,"score_spread":0.35709929902213333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132478289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050920937,0.033642437,0.0076662046,0.34820402,0.010175334,0.00021301044,0.0007218982,0.000735663,0.59354925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18741277,0.04962966,0.033565745,0.13124064,0.025358347,0.0003954005,0.0018495158,0.0009128008,0.5696351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700523,0.012158857,0.002194984,0.001596256,0.011632879,0.0023648206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361874,0.019421343,0.0051788073,0.010686252,0.01071547,0.017810697],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014116573,0.0004307519,0.00079099013,0.004595482,0.0076638293,0.03111869,0.0017349405,0.006875561,0.08403188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07230096,0.0003682851,0.00068052387,0.00945647,0.008139974,0.017968843,0.012087207,0.0034928685,0.032914042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053591324,0.00006360086,0.0029891396,0.00061799854,0.00002482545,0.00027542483,0.0019515735,0.00005118863,0.0002474212,0.20944883,0.52429134,0.25998515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008259127,0.00001577716,0.0014303799,0.00039027943,0.000008177132,0.00040630114,0.0010813479,0.00003710896,0.00008493913,0.020448556,0.9760701,0.000018821553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069133523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012534906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007832706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027144419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28111464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132615533","doi":"10.1002/asi.20349","title":"The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Natural science; Citation index; Citation; Science Citation Index; Social science; Index (typography); The arts; Digital humanities; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Social Sciences Citation Index; Library science; Sociology; Humanities; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2802135795098643,"score_gpt":0.4847581285676076,"score_spread":0.20454454905774327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132615533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619587,0.0039724996,0.001122092,0.0006884272,0.000103891274,0.000034520075,0.00031389054,0.000035902354,0.031770132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974017,0.00093692687,0.00057243265,0.000037993446,0.00009502126,0.000014466471,0.00023377824,0.000023582073,0.0006840131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911056,0.002705243,0.0013828458,0.0009273285,0.0035092814,0.00036977432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84856105,0.074093185,0.04466245,0.0074458076,0.022035072,0.0032024337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011853801,0.00024081983,0.00051122403,0.021331636,0.0011796099,0.0072128265,0.0009623148,0.00068187807,0.0033539536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12130246,0.00019192752,0.00039182376,0.036506627,0.0025770147,0.007117809,0.003772966,0.0006494054,0.0006382853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002879914,0.00012910996,0.86131716,0.0007351608,0.00020808112,0.0003310155,0.029002853,0.0005654144,0.000926548,0.013670836,0.0015008998,0.091324896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010945061,0.00013785916,0.96880406,0.0003724582,0.0000927675,0.0002313015,0.01704381,0.00093408144,0.0005997348,0.0030444935,0.008706161,0.000022270782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058366065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066961106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020762712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016429088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0626896},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2132781897","doi":"10.1007/s10961-011-9238-3","title":"Visualizing nanotechnology research in Canada: evidence from publication activities, 1990–2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Technology Transfer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Bibliometrics; Regional science; Commercial law; Political science; Nanotechnology; Geography; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6982587638005132,"score_gpt":0.5440037586826795,"score_spread":0.15425500511783374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132781897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197942,0.0140908975,0.00056437147,0.0046947156,0.00007225304,0.000046140274,0.037477557,0.0001508001,0.023108987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98324424,0.005119891,0.00088264904,0.00016167152,0.00002156202,0.000015036204,0.0068939207,0.00002936767,0.0036316805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962696,0.00024521234,0.00030769018,0.00036246152,0.0021533715,0.00066169776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96894795,0.004090941,0.0054427995,0.0006251047,0.018462365,0.0024308048],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025681732,0.0004571775,0.00053899724,0.019848572,0.0036535733,0.006601829,0.0013818542,0.00071081327,0.003237357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021570444,0.00027034327,0.00061959913,0.06327272,0.0014808091,0.002184649,0.002249406,0.0007854717,0.00041653303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024001236,0.00006586569,0.89221406,0.00059601385,0.00034198596,0.00023086056,0.007945291,0.0018128378,0.00056893146,0.0042764926,0.016833091,0.074874565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010817547,0.000014676549,0.9741088,0.0002105309,0.00012869753,0.00005454076,0.0066684745,0.0009233993,0.00040163938,0.00029554637,0.017139908,0.000042931737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99576616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9801514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0617463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1298489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44800287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132832845","doi":"10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.026","title":"Trends in otolaryngology research during the period 1995‐2000: A bibliometric approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otolaryngology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Gross domestic product; Bibliometrics; Population; Geography; Library science; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.40841027301130944,"score_gpt":0.5321889137873425,"score_spread":0.12377864077603301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132832845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92057896,0.018976606,0.001006176,0.0006109841,0.00006017271,0.00029610787,0.050386947,0.00015896454,0.007925198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495666,0.012891357,0.0031421338,0.00009145957,0.00019494283,0.0004413282,0.032455605,0.00003297189,0.0011835574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930419,0.0009435425,0.0021185142,0.0007020213,0.002845515,0.00034856965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792448,0.005390779,0.010383896,0.00045369676,0.003993558,0.0005332002],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005852404,0.0005170684,0.0009812022,0.09873363,0.0005776902,0.0034099713,0.0006892896,0.0005675916,0.0017192569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019363929,0.00024702222,0.0014408627,0.13612,0.00043397307,0.002460843,0.0013234629,0.00037878557,0.0005962097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272542,0.000082069775,0.94857144,0.0028441064,0.0009744233,0.0002590238,0.0009894992,0.001128763,0.00051404623,0.0005311965,0.0020984476,0.04173446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012106551,0.00008868411,0.99215955,0.00028385816,0.00025610818,0.00032023506,0.0011250714,0.0010366894,0.00019482439,0.00012246147,0.004385738,0.000014736193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013267619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01279698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9012664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023599311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024770224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030950844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133948460","doi":"10.5860/crl.75.5.664","title":"Exploring the Veterinary Literature: A Bibliometric Methodology for Identifying Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Publications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publication; Accreditation; Veterinary medicine; Bibliometrics; Work (physics); Scopus; Institution; Library science; MEDLINE; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9170081740482853,"score_gpt":0.6480557156310761,"score_spread":0.26895245841720916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133948460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6683543,0.0077176234,0.1911199,0.003505596,0.0005184429,0.007901286,0.058940858,0.003692231,0.058249857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7019665,0.0031510382,0.2641998,0.00012422702,0.00043951947,0.0069121886,0.01975242,0.00031901782,0.0031353012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977076,0.0065862993,0.005030548,0.0014549927,0.009209643,0.0006424797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91712844,0.0526747,0.014182433,0.0035438149,0.011175323,0.0012953128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0228315,0.0012606335,0.0015672506,0.22537601,0.0024840697,0.006945124,0.0014290995,0.0009064215,0.003703609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08311975,0.0004405716,0.0017882916,0.22665812,0.0016434485,0.0060945456,0.004748169,0.00071846583,0.0010297358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027109828,0.0003791063,0.3071441,0.00803574,0.0011222896,0.000860013,0.027639711,0.005109328,0.006736429,0.033356115,0.020304915,0.58904105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000259369,0.0006592304,0.6540701,0.0021855636,0.0012126167,0.0020231924,0.046857364,0.048644383,0.008876285,0.057961114,0.17667964,0.0005710847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005316838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070731193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030326406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071193753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12074596},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2134053123","doi":"10.5860/crl-203","title":"Open Access Publishing: What Authors Want","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Electronic publishing; Library science; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Access to information; Information access; Computer science; Political science; Public relations; The Internet; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.9264619247716932,"score_gpt":0.7023231709270353,"score_spread":0.22413875384465787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134053123","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22171599,0.023148058,0.003032079,0.61633074,0.006353065,0.00011866518,0.0010079578,0.00035493803,0.12793854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85041,0.016741883,0.0043213805,0.08573382,0.008375981,0.00010795793,0.00081572135,0.0004107694,0.03308255],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823658,0.005264883,0.0014393053,0.00088390056,0.00825505,0.0017911376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8753185,0.046569977,0.01507719,0.0048370804,0.026224416,0.031972848],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015333184,0.00029236625,0.0012357133,0.0025703276,0.0048381262,0.028071173,0.0012643303,0.005992792,0.012376612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10021143,0.00031857062,0.0006784497,0.0074067814,0.0047774143,0.026205584,0.0037631197,0.004240691,0.008379613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039249286,0.0006170035,0.187408,0.0026705337,0.00018929857,0.0015217265,0.059216514,0.00017172468,0.001800546,0.040385935,0.27120578,0.43442044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011699301,0.00028109856,0.058302306,0.0020631144,0.00019622307,0.003521735,0.30306405,0.00055284484,0.0016140995,0.10540408,0.5246152,0.00026824826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016615632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030285416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99873567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003018364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006065267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134386090","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.001","title":"The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Impact factor; Citation; Preference; Computer science; Index (typography); Information retrieval; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Library science; Data science; Operations research; Statistics; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.578649466269294,"score_gpt":0.5307756849711357,"score_spread":0.047873781298158335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134386090","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028281638,0.00033326237,0.96082526,0.00062278594,0.0001244145,0.00033673926,0.00030975195,0.00073524535,0.008430893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23703468,0.00037511092,0.7583946,0.000089490415,0.000083785366,0.00023896518,0.00036046517,0.00006779842,0.003355118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953284,0.0018530131,0.00030107403,0.00029962295,0.0020022918,0.000215641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062157,0.0036320654,0.00035441428,0.00058090745,0.0045144963,0.0002965357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042838063,0.000547544,0.0011628213,0.006422334,0.00094699993,0.0034375223,0.0013826565,0.0009782545,0.004150451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016255852,0.0004183847,0.0011417918,0.0047661434,0.0004455532,0.0028795158,0.0011819466,0.001054356,0.0014975029],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022872158,0.00059042155,0.008458835,0.00056994776,0.00037869686,0.00024120153,0.00032654367,0.057314787,0.008139842,0.07184172,0.0077307695,0.8441784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006400125,0.00045421548,0.0042029964,0.000069556496,0.000175362,0.0002979835,0.00025751608,0.94240904,0.006769102,0.035480414,0.00971019,0.00010958835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005447386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076669375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011670353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003742847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022655189},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2134548949","doi":"10.1002/asi.23005","title":"Are elite journals declining?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Publishing; Prestige; Publication; Excellence; Citation; Impact factor; Diversification (marketing strategy); Political science; Hierarchy; Library science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.3054164613764956,"score_gpt":0.5279448656534843,"score_spread":0.22252840427698872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134548949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5779738,0.07841467,0.0008597107,0.17560875,0.0055944948,0.00012881469,0.004686429,0.0004098832,0.15632349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090818,0.032901403,0.00051163527,0.025781238,0.0077108853,0.00009108093,0.0029009162,0.00024241759,0.020778548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907116,0.0014250098,0.0010498463,0.00148953,0.0037497203,0.0015742327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89436865,0.018333506,0.03777067,0.004219657,0.025247978,0.020059496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010321847,0.00038193347,0.0009920723,0.012220081,0.0028963126,0.014294358,0.0024865782,0.0023079705,0.026189407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07670347,0.00039300177,0.0004976407,0.024922924,0.002362717,0.010692532,0.003053462,0.0016284287,0.005217281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004778515,0.00024359078,0.4337898,0.001685829,0.0002116323,0.0012727842,0.013184195,0.00021622363,0.0008710946,0.025348289,0.12620834,0.39649042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012765132,0.00027776157,0.5563511,0.0012932274,0.00014846287,0.0022491715,0.02317138,0.00022503441,0.0006101219,0.017639685,0.39783716,0.000069189955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010030109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010325404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045167254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005094187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08761233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135154713","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12026","title":"The Relevance of the “h‐” and “g‐” Index to Economics in the Context of A Nation‐Wide Research Evaluation Scheme: The New Zealand Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Relevance (law); Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Journal ranking; Scheme (mathematics); Citation; Frame (networking); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Operations research; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.26799216679491544,"score_gpt":0.48934658099934286,"score_spread":0.22135441420442742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135154713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408927,0.0021463493,0.033218797,0.013652561,0.00019322045,0.0005211597,0.0010538156,0.000068828354,0.10825262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882359,0.00040884505,0.008796863,0.00019337222,0.00008850162,0.00020290472,0.00020380768,0.000021100836,0.0018486874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9517681,0.02758052,0.004410041,0.0023197765,0.011583097,0.0023384257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8652603,0.07574777,0.02248942,0.010692039,0.022394117,0.0034162276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06640576,0.00055157,0.0012657999,0.009989869,0.0018035921,0.007122241,0.0012967143,0.0011102781,0.001822836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20990567,0.00027197407,0.00075731275,0.015509982,0.005849453,0.0076872767,0.003874848,0.0016013958,0.0002150193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005685487,0.00022119921,0.52784616,0.0007831091,0.00048621686,0.00078106433,0.01282981,0.009527575,0.0012879048,0.28703362,0.0036722862,0.15496252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014096586,0.0007978974,0.7929104,0.00090203475,0.00042440437,0.00086200325,0.0198857,0.035172306,0.002393085,0.10514705,0.041048136,0.00031611323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05032417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04264976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99001014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070688743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067728586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3511914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135196769","doi":"10.1177/0883073808315170","title":"Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Child Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamite; Citation; Dilemma; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation index; Economic shortage; Science Citation Index; Alchemy; Explosive material; History; Law; Art history; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.44131852269467553,"score_gpt":0.5594017655138307,"score_spread":0.11808324281915517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135196769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017063372,0.022810798,0.047384415,0.5807046,0.007738353,0.000099986464,0.00055241707,0.0005699946,0.32307613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77581614,0.0152449235,0.022230502,0.12451371,0.022093598,0.0002928382,0.00028404134,0.0010485658,0.038475636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748395,0.009779779,0.00097274553,0.0028767225,0.010334397,0.0011967269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79300284,0.16570199,0.0051031094,0.012953904,0.01713189,0.006106233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036413882,0.001237935,0.0017914763,0.008129686,0.0084645795,0.013964572,0.0037267986,0.007525916,0.014143721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20119599,0.00076945685,0.0008466936,0.005130537,0.04039502,0.025907228,0.008649504,0.012357393,0.0050695376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086514534,0.00004269148,0.0018057689,0.00011903001,0.000057974317,0.00033676493,0.0019096608,0.00033704384,0.00009329115,0.8465791,0.08249338,0.06613881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004568682,0.000015545207,0.00049090234,0.00014063474,0.000014721334,0.00034301242,0.000716953,0.000543741,0.00010788703,0.92897016,0.06856385,0.00004697955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044026035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033583047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058515472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039269063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1925773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137829353","doi":"10.1002/2327-6924.12163","title":"Author and journal responsibilities postpublication: The relationship continues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nurse practitioners; Medicine; Family medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.2735482378427201,"score_gpt":0.5313622366473569,"score_spread":0.25781399880463685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137829353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011734365,0.010103067,0.0016767115,0.73676,0.037913144,0.000096401935,0.0016828653,0.00067837007,0.1993551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30492428,0.017127171,0.005393558,0.15818597,0.056880675,0.00053846923,0.0032413083,0.0024562532,0.4512523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9345119,0.01828792,0.0064396965,0.006491361,0.026296584,0.007972519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33468133,0.32115248,0.03717877,0.026339512,0.16939268,0.11125524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07263401,0.00046824903,0.0013540767,0.005834977,0.00973149,0.030268475,0.0028627396,0.01108989,0.16987137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37936118,0.0006952125,0.0008809143,0.009887858,0.0046635726,0.023670167,0.0060527925,0.010104509,0.08417159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027622384,0.00019061762,0.027785491,0.000369956,0.000028885865,0.0002719681,0.0023797853,0.000046669487,0.00018622862,0.025466006,0.8245661,0.118432015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015948682,0.0001391366,0.047028337,0.0014961788,0.00006712804,0.0009079783,0.011500695,0.00023602249,0.00062679185,0.036664777,0.9010079,0.00016564073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004301783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009272375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98891014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062791817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027635084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5682764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139696124","doi":"10.1177/014107680710000313","title":"Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors’ views","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Medical Association; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Citation; Publishing; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3038861671097597,"score_gpt":0.5442329820298968,"score_spread":0.2403468149201371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139696124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849474,0.002030281,0.00023790427,0.00035358634,0.000029196062,0.00006399273,0.010609422,0.000031887816,0.0016961287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915421,0.0007671269,0.00041434082,0.000089123234,0.00010576028,0.00009024734,0.006574212,0.000013990844,0.00040307164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944457,0.0008284154,0.0015950782,0.0006588253,0.0019365151,0.00053558056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8645398,0.014043341,0.09618342,0.0028861663,0.01819432,0.004152975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005772896,0.00037562367,0.000597648,0.012804072,0.0006780531,0.0024027296,0.00075083686,0.0007304609,0.0013392626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042886272,0.00040379204,0.00070060696,0.013225809,0.00047932233,0.0024384267,0.0008917995,0.0007871666,0.00073236966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016438404,0.000026780936,0.9949587,0.00007189206,0.00006904975,0.00004580601,0.0005080833,0.00003259114,0.000084386775,0.000031288117,0.0005564205,0.0034505785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000469138,0.000068285255,0.9982023,0.000021904974,0.000026397938,0.000156208,0.00046415356,0.000064788816,0.000121674755,0.000015972131,0.0008447517,0.00000872434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009028181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007864895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013461206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014589584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030530393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139770987","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Natural science; The arts; Citation index; Index (typography); Sociology; Social science; Citation; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.43608455016924813,"score_gpt":0.5388048553623775,"score_spread":0.10272030519312941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139770987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7971361,0.027595932,0.0048002144,0.008484713,0.00029851578,0.00036832117,0.04362488,0.00024796693,0.11744335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97210455,0.009189434,0.0036877098,0.00022709442,0.0000387018,0.000120547185,0.008479314,0.000057707326,0.0060949367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535537,0.0005352806,0.00018772871,0.00046662593,0.0026363702,0.00081864325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801267,0.0034543236,0.0023863136,0.00048482986,0.011174635,0.0023732502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036315566,0.00063888874,0.00074669044,0.032191977,0.008152015,0.0047024367,0.0018103592,0.00077465357,0.0074800146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026466431,0.00030647265,0.00088657625,0.08644978,0.0012735965,0.002440434,0.0031812496,0.0007378831,0.00046438057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070336735,0.00014581792,0.5542405,0.0032385013,0.0010041532,0.00072347303,0.027866608,0.0059078992,0.0012793505,0.130759,0.07623928,0.19789205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089957284,0.000046825397,0.8362703,0.0007341796,0.00066462404,0.00030639354,0.022377662,0.005203996,0.0006151881,0.0054557933,0.12809795,0.00013708505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99636847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07722927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12804164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56034017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140303754","doi":"10.1017/s000708740999032x","title":"William H. Brock, William Crookes (1832–1919) and the Commercialization of Science. Alderhot: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. xxi+556. ISBN 978-0-7546-6322-5. £65.00 (hardback).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2029347153252693,"score_gpt":0.4338361723541546,"score_spread":0.23090145702888532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140303754","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043745697,0.9349168,0.00050875614,0.030315671,0.0074330843,0.000017056227,0.0002871494,0.00003617752,0.026047872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011205889,0.7378512,0.0016665378,0.010261599,0.004613439,0.00005010054,0.00035129738,0.00014254266,0.23385736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877745,0.00025355932,0.00012324034,0.00021490443,0.0005039956,0.00012690214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856985,0.0005860792,0.00021080169,0.00006281147,0.0003883918,0.00018201901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001998187,0.0011877782,0.00094160973,0.004679725,0.002546529,0.004547221,0.0009885164,0.0038461813,0.042390887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004319921,0.0010437449,0.00045781056,0.0057117073,0.0032799402,0.008729331,0.0018141269,0.0038244217,0.02076502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005134109,0.000013981031,0.00031777227,0.0004637142,0.000010994537,0.00013095411,0.00083609694,0.00004527099,0.00011420626,0.019420074,0.8627981,0.11579753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043978803,0.000005152727,0.0006265668,0.00085511844,0.0000041980998,0.00017043305,0.00035149526,0.000009788328,0.00008924319,0.0071424185,0.9907268,0.000014433165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023372365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07359284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99745345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032954987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033943371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14181161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140526998","doi":"10.1177/0011392113512839","title":"Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Latin Americans; Competition (biology); Publishing; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Underpinning; Economics; Regional science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7347256811544957,"score_gpt":0.6247458854410771,"score_spread":0.10997979571341854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140526998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38627252,0.03741737,0.003730674,0.2362497,0.0004181094,0.000058770518,0.0005843536,0.000063838066,0.33520463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936915,0.0054932795,0.00052011333,0.002064457,0.00028961687,0.000020038964,0.0000795933,0.00001788698,0.00214574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146116,0.0037339476,0.00055363466,0.0007555604,0.002130219,0.0013656213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97033656,0.01230983,0.008433875,0.0011238459,0.004174306,0.003621597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009571863,0.00013891415,0.0006043498,0.0027564412,0.0016487458,0.011261028,0.0008352813,0.0010863598,0.005943317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025680333,0.00012958077,0.00038863087,0.008532628,0.010323275,0.007518843,0.0045763357,0.001664578,0.00033764754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017583552,0.0001427982,0.15030307,0.0005018842,0.000109034954,0.00033433782,0.0072351154,0.0010786861,0.0006126996,0.7556811,0.006171542,0.077653944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012596179,0.00023996284,0.48654488,0.0015316069,0.00010488591,0.00048221988,0.027479002,0.0017465855,0.00069048925,0.31945568,0.16146892,0.00012978562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012995103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011592788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011336653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008877328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082253575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140842165","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007098","title":"Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Field (mathematics); Baseline (sea); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Regional science; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Statistics; Geography; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Data mining; Library science; Political science; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7583291958422465,"score_gpt":0.6992803763177389,"score_spread":0.05904881952450758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140842165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86854595,0.0010443558,0.0928946,0.00041685882,0.00008605252,0.00020661953,0.0067625516,0.0011224643,0.02892051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588586,0.00038461146,0.036338203,0.000027214692,0.000025102188,0.00012819482,0.0032677073,0.00008886073,0.00088139414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966414,0.0012532761,0.00028843776,0.0006467264,0.0009563855,0.00021376612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98441744,0.007729802,0.003365686,0.0022984664,0.0018284448,0.00036019372],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002942014,0.00037136668,0.00041983818,0.015733004,0.0005436181,0.0028344318,0.0004116887,0.00039700052,0.0031207441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02352447,0.00019501107,0.0006097572,0.018848546,0.00052732154,0.0024775984,0.0028884835,0.00047940528,0.00068218424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000626104,0.00014629634,0.3764652,0.0011056738,0.00042869948,0.00046471646,0.009115664,0.03306716,0.009383695,0.046398845,0.004228083,0.51856995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005427759,0.00030121783,0.80847555,0.00040144016,0.00025450546,0.00090693595,0.0102404775,0.06112588,0.007934103,0.06437018,0.045711376,0.00022404447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029047194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003249775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008690291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072515156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015559018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141246632","doi":"10.1023/a:1016007205344","title":"Contribution of Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine to the world's biomedical literature (1988-1997)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turkish; Science Citation Index; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.38260139108866204,"score_gpt":0.5123331948262367,"score_spread":0.1297318037375747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141246632","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22852227,0.549052,0.0008446887,0.07276297,0.0070227887,0.00017341154,0.03524163,0.00017037106,0.10620993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57622,0.34386924,0.003957187,0.0032248031,0.004637309,0.00015831024,0.013486678,0.00009550258,0.054351028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667066,0.0005618564,0.00027956953,0.00034406176,0.0017854982,0.00035839697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541695,0.0039298697,0.0019636638,0.0004286231,0.0060093356,0.0022516258],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004998206,0.0003516298,0.00045099002,0.027317107,0.0014639895,0.0033581327,0.0008536311,0.0010744951,0.012681925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024404079,0.0003085904,0.0003219392,0.030475125,0.00075473177,0.0014552557,0.0030917267,0.0005923945,0.0019512409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040359428,0.0000942369,0.13019761,0.003586937,0.0001761185,0.0007176878,0.003278132,0.00043531045,0.00072497106,0.0055016303,0.18523797,0.66964585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025026007,0.00003229304,0.50175637,0.0021519025,0.00011221687,0.000782053,0.001986538,0.00014393165,0.0010282977,0.0005876983,0.4913734,0.000020295805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05733196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08391295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00960106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022769649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113996506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141275412","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.343","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Public relations; Open data; Scholarly communication; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141275412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213386,0.00030510887,0.00050079834,0.002585635,0.000030239325,0.00003179283,0.000027930982,0.00000550885,0.0043791565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998324,0.0002232701,0.0005361659,0.00026173636,0.000050014893,0.00001631616,0.000023942774,0.0000033128538,0.00056133955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680954,0.0010658714,0.000272444,0.00016887694,0.0013716877,0.00031153546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536673,0.022575432,0.014108825,0.0016234628,0.0036187822,0.004406307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060409214,0.00009979661,0.00028745996,0.0016022726,0.0012959545,0.004181571,0.0005443357,0.0012751356,0.0016132254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038948737,0.00020541075,0.00024308704,0.0020478833,0.0015743071,0.0027679328,0.0015698554,0.001206238,0.00034690864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015599218,0.00068910647,0.8995864,0.00023381942,0.00007889866,0.00037565586,0.0232273,0.00015024071,0.0023791115,0.008124446,0.0014084905,0.06359054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000712088,0.00028179935,0.9088285,0.00016513193,0.00006383377,0.000654216,0.06089679,0.0014378107,0.0014657272,0.011810219,0.014252483,0.00007232859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011061239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017740004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070795126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016575758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03194779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141810726","doi":"10.1002/meet.2011.14504801190","title":"Bibliometrics and LIS education: How do they fit together?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Higher education; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2697617665253107,"score_gpt":0.463028559855294,"score_spread":0.1932667933299833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141810726","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024001589,0.16075662,0.038508546,0.6987037,0.0051509375,0.00023179747,0.00067376735,0.000805113,0.07116795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7173531,0.1252622,0.06710758,0.058699444,0.020014271,0.00087165704,0.001018671,0.00086143456,0.008811643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9157255,0.05528595,0.006066508,0.003174589,0.017715681,0.0020317407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6222025,0.28883055,0.02147685,0.009257219,0.05045226,0.007780661],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10510016,0.0015760664,0.0048328927,0.043245923,0.0032101474,0.033459272,0.0031872597,0.0063712453,0.00857395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32155263,0.001549073,0.0017581618,0.053924356,0.015716502,0.05738788,0.011966363,0.008879542,0.002669072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016356993,0.00020830527,0.0683789,0.002968008,0.00092612667,0.00019044096,0.009982138,0.0014236142,0.00015371587,0.27542222,0.05331575,0.5868673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011514883,0.00018774607,0.065496944,0.013273352,0.0005237258,0.0004021263,0.023180384,0.005709459,0.00029796848,0.7593272,0.1310335,0.0004524894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009002021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006960374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010264891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009665162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5558294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141830052","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00674.x","title":"Measuring Canadian Business School Research Output and Impact","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Per capita; Political science; Citation; Production (economics); Knowledge production; Citation impact; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Demography; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.7774522412148315,"score_gpt":0.5354232998974645,"score_spread":0.24202894131736696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141830052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797547,0.006276873,0.0032784042,0.005716044,0.00015576459,0.00014953857,0.044360492,0.00055039796,0.15975776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744762,0.0031180752,0.002077498,0.00013270971,0.000084675245,0.000054262175,0.011061897,0.000053288575,0.008941314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906481,0.00073207245,0.00029772983,0.0003898957,0.007171328,0.00076094485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96708125,0.0041944655,0.0041432744,0.00066205236,0.021063881,0.0028551717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004142172,0.00051272806,0.0005556841,0.024704328,0.0017485656,0.004683007,0.0010728973,0.0003156553,0.004620178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032642327,0.00017409389,0.00040472162,0.039406765,0.00090975914,0.0011221376,0.0017499895,0.00042805928,0.0006139647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001217312,0.000060856288,0.8259551,0.00070997165,0.00030597125,0.00014978694,0.0028829277,0.006257661,0.001166341,0.012205223,0.020821765,0.12936257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068402765,0.000024406148,0.96525085,0.00011697324,0.00007656208,0.000037860693,0.001907289,0.0017781865,0.00092837476,0.00092277763,0.028920285,0.00002957713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91620296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92991626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030716376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03533554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22286391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142066148","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1676-5","title":"Benchmarking bibliometrics in biomedical research: research performance of the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine, 2008–2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Benchmarking; Citation; Citation analysis; Web of science; Library science; Impact factor; Medical education; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.8554237139510291,"score_gpt":0.6280879688612137,"score_spread":0.22733574508981547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142066148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622803,0.02157226,0.0008297542,0.016392505,0.0003800794,0.00014340592,0.070628695,0.00044773007,0.027325269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97656983,0.002952608,0.00075409526,0.00021905822,0.00013788279,0.000028300738,0.013861532,0.000026898522,0.005449942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936348,0.0006220753,0.0007541457,0.0005890193,0.0035212946,0.0008786085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612766,0.0030456488,0.008086549,0.0012758421,0.018838108,0.007477281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005457859,0.0005020854,0.00074165605,0.008238276,0.0014561961,0.0034878647,0.0013161823,0.00080551545,0.0022591883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030304529,0.0003569664,0.00052236475,0.031169534,0.00091120094,0.0014839993,0.0021126803,0.0007616836,0.0007027491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009515071,0.00009825069,0.7760272,0.0019236733,0.00063155295,0.00021849106,0.005318493,0.004281513,0.0016961753,0.0038119243,0.10048721,0.10455409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008478131,0.000023870249,0.9909356,0.000057513284,0.00005281024,0.000026715366,0.0006329165,0.0003324621,0.00022055296,0.00003186774,0.0076639275,0.000013146147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88921565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9326521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052763823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058582727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38283008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142992057","doi":"","title":"Bootstrapping to evaluate accuracy of citation-based journal indicators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Impact factor; Interpretation (philosophy); Statistics; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5200063442583572,"score_gpt":0.5320609243583265,"score_spread":0.012054580099969292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142992057","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43886656,0.0054208655,0.5334198,0.00092610234,0.0008682388,0.0021185174,0.0031335752,0.0015178549,0.013728474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8146193,0.0007113306,0.1782329,0.00019498545,0.0003885756,0.002153285,0.0023440756,0.00025822408,0.0010973493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.92838514,0.04559225,0.004991775,0.0042625773,0.015840199,0.0009281207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5571514,0.35207266,0.027275108,0.035141874,0.027108617,0.0012503106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07648881,0.0011868417,0.0015046863,0.008811634,0.0011288244,0.0018908961,0.0026084834,0.0017131347,0.0036435714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4004979,0.00034050207,0.002005595,0.013898476,0.002333971,0.0021045583,0.002258236,0.0015788564,0.0009683805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033468453,0.00083802734,0.25811198,0.0024743213,0.0043383823,0.00083112525,0.0032960414,0.092344075,0.005756045,0.033228457,0.010134148,0.5853006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000563509,0.005007388,0.33683938,0.0014881667,0.0016987709,0.0015340487,0.0022251003,0.49931684,0.019447282,0.09897694,0.032481536,0.00042103566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031060956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015839143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99118835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011372518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014521374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40451634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143612877","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x","title":"Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Citation impact; Sample (material); Citation analysis; Web of science; Information retrieval; Scholarly communication; Impact factor; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.9469149544521874,"score_gpt":0.6472795575330219,"score_spread":0.2996353969191655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143612877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146519,0.0007794899,0.038273636,0.0016538457,0.00038207253,0.00092055683,0.0024363059,0.0015240008,0.039378203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387319,0.00028563116,0.047134183,0.0004967335,0.00031717416,0.0011985976,0.0029177978,0.00018916898,0.008728739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95702046,0.01784567,0.0042367037,0.0029140883,0.01662222,0.0013609065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.807417,0.08184943,0.029542983,0.023020295,0.0534252,0.0047450336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033172548,0.00069309,0.0007823675,0.007580075,0.0015768837,0.0075996025,0.002169634,0.0024792075,0.010517994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15839444,0.00038955835,0.00052814046,0.007810215,0.0007348582,0.007791086,0.0025653474,0.0011150902,0.008676208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067444536,0.0027450502,0.6375815,0.00035520404,0.00019704137,0.000106757376,0.002671621,0.0010946185,0.0066047567,0.007354011,0.016736217,0.32387885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062550406,0.005066344,0.7205945,0.00088633056,0.00084874267,0.0006143325,0.014586889,0.069534436,0.06949195,0.014627728,0.102871545,0.00025165227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014080261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002359415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016512517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003083745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1754353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143750031","doi":"10.1111/radm.12100","title":"Scientists' commitment to underperforming research projects: linking past success and the social environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"R and D Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Business; Investment (military); Escalation of commitment; Social network (sociolinguistics); Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5463097067868062,"score_gpt":0.5646876813673392,"score_spread":0.01837797458053292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143750031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784076,0.000050507228,0.00053610833,0.00017857099,0.000004078641,0.000006344254,0.000010483735,0.0000022674267,0.0013709341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953985,0.000050458213,0.00021644689,0.000018379482,0.000005539069,0.000009803802,0.000015676893,0.0000013622106,0.00014260673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958135,0.0064216964,0.0007249593,0.00081472605,0.0018462543,0.0006109685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87353224,0.07296162,0.0332107,0.00581657,0.0048246407,0.0096542705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01043226,0.00021978944,0.00039726117,0.0015816521,0.0018774424,0.0035120442,0.0006480328,0.00069507345,0.0020005582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059271988,0.00026688646,0.00031267366,0.0012743506,0.0019204956,0.0021728808,0.003977945,0.0014715651,0.00018390449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017187996,0.00025324372,0.9616873,0.00007071897,0.00017379594,0.00027812427,0.013320169,0.0013952496,0.0008551865,0.0013039383,0.00014992995,0.020340404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001537433,0.00031195104,0.96597123,0.00004975884,0.000061059895,0.00023891852,0.025648315,0.0023274762,0.0006166834,0.0029467184,0.0017531682,0.000059336744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015863744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034757245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98956776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009649566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014404524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055171728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145535121","doi":"10.5539/ass.v9n5p18","title":"A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1875,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Prestige; Rank (graph theory); Database; Computer science; Bibliographic database; Publishing; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.41470723689172,"score_gpt":0.5854768175044064,"score_spread":0.17076958061268638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145535121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7427436,0.08449638,0.016351983,0.004658094,0.0010721727,0.0020848096,0.084093705,0.0009039175,0.06359537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8178755,0.03483683,0.053388815,0.0005808741,0.00067637715,0.002352695,0.086598374,0.0002552929,0.0034352937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97791004,0.004387688,0.006451255,0.001104168,0.009429781,0.000717096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339866,0.02647586,0.00936804,0.0025060782,0.025442047,0.0022213645],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013931656,0.00052368606,0.00146499,0.106837295,0.001405709,0.0074198204,0.0013131122,0.0007669452,0.00302736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064565,0.00025419882,0.0009570683,0.12411607,0.0006484876,0.0053090462,0.0026047097,0.00047769767,0.0009216597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038253556,0.0007337996,0.24647146,0.023650989,0.0030436665,0.00134722,0.007396758,0.0017233458,0.004909311,0.029510597,0.03734069,0.6400468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040969875,0.0009617961,0.76336145,0.008025389,0.0037887387,0.0028142564,0.03272444,0.0047873324,0.00644182,0.012080682,0.16424656,0.00035782444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048528234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068394165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019692436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046130368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07367855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145694442","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0278-5","title":"Is the academic Ivory Tower becoming a managed structure? A nested analysis of the variance in activities of researchers from natural sciences and engineering in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ivory tower; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Variance (accounting); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Adaptation (eye); Institutional theory; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Law; Business","score_opus":0.3143140146529494,"score_gpt":0.4913641469124948,"score_spread":0.1770501322595454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145694442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968646,0.000097412136,0.00071085163,0.00030022964,0.00001106451,0.0000258278,0.00033695938,0.000010155893,0.0016428519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.000034982262,0.0004663141,0.000030112742,0.0000052859614,0.000010349508,0.0002083601,0.000009665515,0.0009602213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939737,0.0017781324,0.00022111609,0.000955983,0.0012982633,0.0017727648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681218,0.010622389,0.0043995604,0.0022011204,0.008214947,0.0064401934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474436,0.00030884263,0.0012347061,0.0031441255,0.0058020703,0.0043955115,0.002285411,0.0006978801,0.003002096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03151693,0.00035241627,0.00094946806,0.005655375,0.0046514682,0.0015789135,0.0030971488,0.0011938564,0.000245391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044461465,0.00012905798,0.9518384,0.000037823433,0.00030308752,0.00025361954,0.016146695,0.0017964186,0.0006278359,0.011747352,0.0020175462,0.014657482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003494528,0.0000885489,0.95298743,0.00006165177,0.00014698657,0.000035571295,0.03200144,0.0090749115,0.00024554448,0.002097437,0.0031756186,0.00004986964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97074336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99685585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029796476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06252902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21618956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146704605","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060687","title":"Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Proxy (statistics); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Test (biology); Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10349770925510939,"score_gpt":0.46514020023728275,"score_spread":0.3616424909821734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146704605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570956,0.0024738465,0.018696813,0.0011949297,0.0009783623,0.0026120683,0.0026856423,0.00029635313,0.013966274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98170197,0.00047387887,0.013500152,0.00019610989,0.00018691963,0.0015382827,0.0013359754,0.000059766917,0.0010070511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.77447206,0.121485665,0.047531962,0.01020372,0.04364281,0.0026638475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35767856,0.36857572,0.14137377,0.046971463,0.08183456,0.0035659196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15047579,0.0008576514,0.0011155524,0.0060474677,0.0011425654,0.002348071,0.0018267584,0.0010904741,0.0019550044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4393861,0.0005045956,0.0015947464,0.0039169104,0.0025859638,0.0022580922,0.004406225,0.0013948518,0.0012654539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002054855,0.00038735493,0.82965213,0.0014899786,0.0005840942,0.00031653212,0.015611533,0.0012387818,0.0022331239,0.0021405672,0.00584343,0.13844757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036836567,0.0016396691,0.9245831,0.0017385856,0.00037792383,0.0021677734,0.009758877,0.008404177,0.00924407,0.007894486,0.033486698,0.00033633187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005034536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047567993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99890953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010995053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017783956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7958015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146918704","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011","title":"Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; University of Auckland","keywords":"Causal inference; Coding (social sciences); Longitudinal study; Longitudinal data; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Medicine; Econometrics; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.7862779829075962,"score_gpt":0.7031571443127773,"score_spread":0.08312083859481889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146918704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.000116427334,0.00004701515,0.00025040063,0.0000033810127,0.000015536869,0.00012974851,0.0000017637334,0.0003093663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988255,0.0001507751,0.000119878234,0.00009801089,0.0000076848855,0.00003100159,0.00017039986,0.0000031709892,0.00059359736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940614,0.002400195,0.00063414173,0.0006739118,0.0010468988,0.0011835808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660356,0.00617919,0.010420777,0.0014165035,0.005285223,0.010662743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01001723,0.00028622986,0.00092321046,0.0039486163,0.0053628483,0.004257054,0.0010559864,0.0014369094,0.0018660182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022369402,0.0008290198,0.0005390646,0.0077796127,0.0017651687,0.003765235,0.004439804,0.0023268303,0.00086808397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013019658,0.00038050453,0.9775438,0.000018111386,0.00005484286,0.00018391697,0.0190173,0.000042790183,0.00022988724,0.00007463823,0.00015434607,0.002169791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017195367,0.00034820885,0.9624856,0.000025610248,0.000038477774,0.000110700494,0.035706233,0.00019180376,0.00010747094,0.00007682367,0.0008622823,0.000029604638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16497228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18217482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004733933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012237373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3280241},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2147137475","doi":"10.5210/fm.v12i10.1959","title":"From production to publishing at CJC online: Experiences, insights, and considerations for adoption","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Monday","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Audience measurement; Electronic publishing; Production (economics); Focus (optics); Public relations; Business; Political science; The Internet; Advertising; World Wide Web; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.4981744242324274,"score_gpt":0.5093103750540346,"score_spread":0.011135950821607232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147137475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.832532,0.0024610087,0.0034174975,0.044999614,0.00058229076,0.00013988698,0.000110389774,0.00013853853,0.1156188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98234415,0.0018780234,0.0022226404,0.0026066487,0.00022900838,0.00006352768,0.00006744298,0.00008844515,0.010500037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783781,0.009210178,0.0010448704,0.0009973212,0.006834548,0.0035349512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309446,0.036901396,0.0048694224,0.0031659445,0.011919601,0.012198932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0150625305,0.00033381427,0.00036035103,0.0025989222,0.014815125,0.016966276,0.0025375772,0.003096105,0.0060942112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06681375,0.0004360336,0.00041011113,0.005634928,0.008164805,0.013404499,0.0063903974,0.005733692,0.0009610101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110737856,0.00047045437,0.027661167,0.00025585378,0.000017059563,0.005027199,0.8062001,0.00019012786,0.0012700589,0.029301284,0.01657791,0.112918034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020785043,0.00016067711,0.012864764,0.0002941933,0.000017241877,0.0018143237,0.77188855,0.00041202435,0.0009473641,0.006377126,0.20509796,0.00010501676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049140804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06041625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075898375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122060105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09770954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147194198","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101311","title":"Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Multivariate analysis; Library science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7377882140349933,"score_gpt":0.6333431856879266,"score_spread":0.1044450283470667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147194198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91787976,0.053648174,0.0016174845,0.018946012,0.000779046,0.000044172506,0.0005439442,0.000066971355,0.006474342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885175,0.009090054,0.00057343784,0.0006517517,0.0006616536,0.0000140533275,0.00016895747,0.000016006483,0.00030651226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96633184,0.012841065,0.006498952,0.002944416,0.009692857,0.0016909124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64319664,0.15574242,0.15777142,0.012414511,0.017262297,0.013612729],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016092142,0.00027168356,0.0006675874,0.007869567,0.0014798379,0.0046410575,0.0012317019,0.0015259824,0.004231001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1468777,0.0003239809,0.0005133508,0.011408488,0.003634733,0.004616969,0.0029056268,0.001367109,0.0006901527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016133695,0.00009037729,0.87792975,0.001521012,0.00013441041,0.0010799629,0.0072980453,0.00006848625,0.00046961827,0.0013015849,0.004028684,0.10591674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003157943,0.00033606275,0.88338965,0.0047500725,0.00020388194,0.02203054,0.047519438,0.00065109634,0.00082029984,0.007808393,0.032324582,0.00013449299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011124224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001388241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001213407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020855682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08510435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147607381","doi":"10.1177/1098214007309280","title":"The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Program evaluation; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Political science; Management science; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8816684527440397,"score_gpt":0.727468180018336,"score_spread":0.1542002727257037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147607381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7063445,0.014783351,0.05792497,0.019530876,0.0013841082,0.0283512,0.002609863,0.0017820799,0.16728903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90006304,0.002928243,0.078293025,0.0014007032,0.0005232908,0.011669555,0.0012996595,0.00021097639,0.0036114464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.4545095,0.40344876,0.02540201,0.012557779,0.098178424,0.005903495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25431406,0.51560307,0.04259395,0.045316815,0.1319751,0.010197001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36134726,0.0017855462,0.0024292078,0.02055239,0.005477903,0.016714787,0.0036273545,0.0022487328,0.0055206297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5048438,0.0007501174,0.0011117503,0.022514656,0.005659251,0.012080372,0.0131008485,0.0020912874,0.0010087212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021461872,0.0026326424,0.06772961,0.00753504,0.00152378,0.00040250568,0.027680939,0.0048174956,0.003534869,0.053502772,0.016172161,0.8123221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040829703,0.023065165,0.33048782,0.014588466,0.0035340674,0.0006938296,0.15136606,0.028741438,0.026282603,0.12168677,0.29448792,0.0009828226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005389399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043397215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022760635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039493117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78757256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150354467","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2015.04.11","title":"Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Database; Web of science; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7579617406582054,"score_gpt":0.587304561522659,"score_spread":0.17065717913554646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150354467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17414491,0.044371497,0.0469014,0.004855473,0.0026646475,0.0034535727,0.2973181,0.005357623,0.4209328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49118847,0.05639282,0.11289895,0.0012018415,0.005057819,0.004457503,0.27419427,0.0016014234,0.053006954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96488756,0.004543681,0.0063768746,0.0013853658,0.021956673,0.00084986846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95653063,0.009998684,0.010262969,0.0023549125,0.019835524,0.0010174006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00850159,0.0012925281,0.0020933214,0.13600467,0.001146421,0.0069715683,0.0012797907,0.0007090154,0.013377069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066441216,0.0003007144,0.0011423635,0.14576802,0.00072772754,0.004210225,0.0020919503,0.0010046747,0.012481122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039163796,0.00035382618,0.08711993,0.00784392,0.0014848267,0.00042775102,0.0017717863,0.0032702517,0.0049564177,0.03452859,0.24885392,0.60899705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239875,0.0004133461,0.2697786,0.0019828451,0.000728335,0.0011306916,0.002069704,0.0056738313,0.0062402748,0.021696568,0.6898366,0.00032521755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045816298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044101067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023811462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041719438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044961214},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2150897866","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002","title":"Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Consistency (knowledge bases); Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data science; Publication; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.8625684102688479,"score_gpt":0.6369410142134144,"score_spread":0.22562739605543347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150897866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82804346,0.022875251,0.10966821,0.004345784,0.00042335535,0.0005820994,0.0022114967,0.00032896604,0.031521324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92567044,0.0037881024,0.06563744,0.0006158964,0.00024151088,0.00017311783,0.0012988247,0.00007283297,0.0025016896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582388,0.03064423,0.0014272452,0.0012802238,0.0079086395,0.00050089764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5815275,0.37969896,0.00438351,0.007923705,0.02560654,0.00085973024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046299923,0.00079618616,0.0014475206,0.008720539,0.0008690643,0.002192702,0.0012486172,0.0020752994,0.0032826366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16675662,0.0001826083,0.0012161656,0.00942368,0.00096819963,0.0025771214,0.0014326847,0.0010723129,0.00067799597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059722513,0.0031789327,0.3295632,0.0039754054,0.0051250304,0.0003572265,0.0034223516,0.024925621,0.0031709678,0.021889312,0.0147870965,0.5836326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017284792,0.009155566,0.598398,0.0015079572,0.0053479397,0.0016289582,0.011354903,0.25401607,0.012358437,0.06413069,0.0397123,0.00066071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076474412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011787687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010952912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012391219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24486029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151102493","doi":"10.1186/1742-6413-3-5","title":"First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 - open access, peer-review, and impact factor.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CytoJournal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Atlanta; Task force; Library science; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.6114807811919001,"score_gpt":0.6231446032566216,"score_spread":0.011663822064721496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151102493","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057311323,0.016617412,0.01759092,0.23238733,0.6416747,0.0017735419,0.0035545896,0.005952959,0.07471737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04268127,0.012455583,0.03967406,0.060311247,0.12579335,0.0018234446,0.00889806,0.0075114844,0.7008515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96839875,0.004290118,0.0024812776,0.0020328998,0.021155449,0.0016414559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6843927,0.028612109,0.0074114655,0.017870048,0.2250622,0.036651507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038123827,0.001453921,0.0022818032,0.008932161,0.009695264,0.017911095,0.004633464,0.0070011625,0.076302744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19453146,0.00097611547,0.0013840608,0.004978855,0.0028271556,0.0060446626,0.0056814738,0.007607255,0.09021851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003615027,0.000031043648,0.0005897427,0.00014605105,0.000008357723,0.00010353529,0.00008790933,0.000022807391,0.0003627915,0.0006403919,0.95985824,0.038112987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017168275,0.000056121502,0.0022693635,0.00017353454,0.000009182235,0.00028040502,0.00015225567,0.00011319472,0.0008333046,0.0011576706,0.99490523,0.00003259545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021637895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00770243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007104628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01996792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25525808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151897275","doi":"10.1126/science.1227833","title":"Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Library science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.783301739546172,"score_gpt":0.6359530430485998,"score_spread":0.1473486964975722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151897275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937418,0.0008226376,0.0022997179,0.00029032564,0.000025606845,0.00008243005,0.001379348,0.000088538494,0.0012696042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944587,0.00041963725,0.0028910988,0.00006323007,0.000083368715,0.00007584346,0.0013344364,0.000036775426,0.0006369966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880419,0.003994188,0.0022510295,0.002014425,0.0029785316,0.0007199345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82281595,0.09746651,0.05465508,0.007941739,0.013077198,0.0040435675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131148575,0.00036376293,0.0008466299,0.011654862,0.0014914051,0.0048178528,0.00084532757,0.0006797713,0.0018680407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08473441,0.0004294121,0.0005230358,0.012405645,0.0011327405,0.0035026378,0.0020728507,0.00058272085,0.0010333266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038181237,0.00014690211,0.94168466,0.0004190572,0.0002637669,0.00014214714,0.0043070964,0.0007313584,0.0031626218,0.0010410136,0.00090683636,0.04681272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029430548,0.00013565127,0.98264116,0.00008292045,0.000103362625,0.0003252476,0.0022869562,0.003299937,0.0021218297,0.004836846,0.0040694913,0.00006730991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016197591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017377059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98834515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012127027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014122691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069358826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152466862","doi":"10.1109/picmet.2008.4599678","title":"Nanotechnology: Canada&amp;#x2019;s position in scientific publications and patents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Futures studies; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Position (finance); Nanotechnology; Impact of nanotechnology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Business; Materials science","score_opus":0.669508814797446,"score_gpt":0.5325534175232226,"score_spread":0.13695539727422334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152466862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10703724,0.025281865,0.0017184477,0.055929687,0.0016586402,0.00012146397,0.076516345,0.00061996205,0.73111635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5458754,0.025623307,0.0037808397,0.001734324,0.0004299058,0.000048693506,0.017278843,0.00027661305,0.40495208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960752,0.0001239399,0.00014414774,0.00022805428,0.002847782,0.0005808262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98493886,0.0015628763,0.0009510854,0.0002486346,0.010033597,0.0022649225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018041701,0.00036708915,0.00045588438,0.01323024,0.0057281386,0.008463455,0.0007318834,0.0009819354,0.04069411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009977812,0.00017532898,0.0002660032,0.042252596,0.0018265541,0.001959741,0.0011649478,0.0007036639,0.0053193835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014537422,0.00006473571,0.06941151,0.0010296112,0.00006719167,0.0004795421,0.0027608431,0.0012070712,0.0009958257,0.08775462,0.4967334,0.33935028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000973694,0.000024063032,0.09258824,0.0004244851,0.000054871947,0.0002485304,0.0038631787,0.0007920999,0.0015721362,0.0024528627,0.89791936,0.00005039604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9654056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97633874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06374535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11826585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46250707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152757094","doi":"10.1177/1094428107300202","title":"Deconstructing Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Structuring; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Scholarship; Craft; Citation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Tacit knowledge; Computer science; Citation analysis; Knowledge management; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.9114990024173193,"score_gpt":0.791205183478571,"score_spread":0.12029381893874824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152757094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3676664,0.012240931,0.3059211,0.032532226,0.00083692756,0.0004281437,0.00028668734,0.00051133113,0.27957624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352889,0.0026525913,0.05343958,0.0009774714,0.0002740846,0.0003614796,0.00019346524,0.00020484925,0.0066076447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97097844,0.020662678,0.0013023164,0.0019281833,0.004056172,0.0010721885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948358,0.035360046,0.0026454628,0.007911122,0.004531846,0.0011934927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02589059,0.0009522975,0.0009262806,0.013574799,0.0053704055,0.022305468,0.0022729025,0.0023326166,0.0023461338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046034697,0.0004929895,0.00069360016,0.009274736,0.05009108,0.02439566,0.013987723,0.0037261737,0.00055695215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016852344,0.000022176993,0.0025325245,0.00016932563,0.000013193238,0.00015471315,0.06595095,0.00039371193,0.0003959465,0.9019212,0.00052459416,0.027904805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060770567,0.000019282463,0.0010323649,0.00034450664,0.000011611663,0.00014910303,0.032550287,0.001237798,0.00037867445,0.9284271,0.035830423,0.000012929174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002652103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034292324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068520214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006193585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13692415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154885740","doi":"10.7202/1002418ar","title":"Les collaborations de recherche en génétique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.925733851711418,"score_gpt":0.6559641779474439,"score_spread":0.2697696737639741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154885740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12392756,0.09059343,0.09526297,0.15108466,0.0039976286,0.0005739676,0.0009514644,0.0009201537,0.5326882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77741337,0.052671637,0.066125214,0.008916521,0.0022907287,0.00090211915,0.0007595888,0.0004088637,0.09051201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8676126,0.09316731,0.0053287097,0.008426143,0.020956933,0.004508319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84275186,0.09376262,0.011690289,0.020680137,0.019190509,0.011924548],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055253923,0.0009934154,0.0015822983,0.010260507,0.0072482424,0.019572152,0.0018632598,0.0056823445,0.018302074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08512032,0.00082240516,0.0013115435,0.019345492,0.0124251945,0.013221516,0.0128200855,0.0041205543,0.00428967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021923278,0.0002162049,0.01861859,0.0023190714,0.00032821097,0.00091197714,0.037040442,0.0018775711,0.0038083233,0.5943987,0.025785148,0.3144766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007316211,0.00020865769,0.014416913,0.0013240186,0.00010155732,0.00096247083,0.016772212,0.00096480135,0.0018401656,0.15372743,0.8095174,0.000091164926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061799614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005644057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010969909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02774333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29221416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156031982","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504301194","title":"Dispelling the Myths Behind First‐author Citation Counts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; CONTEST; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.15533327020605367,"score_gpt":0.45202705366638746,"score_spread":0.2966937834603338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156031982","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28762823,0.020974629,0.29052043,0.288857,0.0056207846,0.00047921992,0.0011362716,0.0006652713,0.10411803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414826,0.002304205,0.04137764,0.0093592405,0.0022817254,0.0005902948,0.00014528647,0.00025747475,0.002201535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.72782314,0.16433744,0.01329073,0.015283201,0.07700721,0.0022582673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23768514,0.6375383,0.03718273,0.03450332,0.051145006,0.0019454956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28477913,0.0011722953,0.0023837404,0.015930781,0.0063176923,0.01601775,0.006011184,0.0042523025,0.0036684216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64983416,0.0010024542,0.0012969058,0.014232745,0.032349363,0.031885825,0.008220319,0.011012839,0.0013148955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041289485,0.0001611058,0.029410236,0.0011199812,0.0005140422,0.00010309404,0.030727232,0.0026513,0.00042202536,0.7770372,0.020355415,0.13708544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012997961,0.0001336502,0.014539247,0.0019278374,0.00014346562,0.00023203704,0.010738103,0.012432727,0.0019359115,0.9228028,0.034816243,0.00016796551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037113624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028714982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072764666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037300878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88199466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156534767","doi":"","title":"INTERNATIONAL RESOURCE COORDINATION: A CISTI PERSPECTIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Resource (disambiguation); Reputation; Key (lock); Information resource; Business; Knowledge management; Information sharing; Shared resource; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.33300162853314974,"score_gpt":0.4719960576210073,"score_spread":0.13899442908785758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156534767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004648844,0.005870021,0.007250379,0.05831783,0.00051049504,0.000067356916,0.0003191472,0.000089647954,0.9229263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7661106,0.037575774,0.016214322,0.014532822,0.0023028138,0.00054042216,0.0012156474,0.00029447075,0.1612131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894539,0.0022615734,0.00048718922,0.0014585385,0.0037336254,0.0026051896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900366,0.0019462205,0.0010370264,0.0006333922,0.003774794,0.0025718817],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073954007,0.0009905858,0.0008922946,0.013120315,0.007701045,0.023108095,0.0030881853,0.004030142,0.015513418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010957944,0.00043789443,0.00066136394,0.02559224,0.016580164,0.011157652,0.0066808537,0.0059152003,0.0011907927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002774167,0.000004916538,0.00023491164,0.000032044543,0.0000058224364,0.000048541664,0.00062407955,0.00043209665,0.000020311274,0.9851034,0.008798168,0.004692983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016897333,0.000024132814,0.0026588715,0.000671984,0.000038893955,0.0002322813,0.010562134,0.0024089185,0.0002541817,0.3079701,0.67512107,0.000040592775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5659217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39849302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06908619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09498652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8732693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158588742","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2270","title":"PhD students’ excellence scholarships and their relationship with research productivity, scientific impact, and degree completion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Publication; Productivity; Government (linguistics); Population; Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.792646206224124,"score_gpt":0.5814627304881991,"score_spread":0.21118347573592489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158588742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99166954,0.00051838695,0.00028790542,0.0012307633,0.000019071362,0.000021083715,0.0009774179,0.000020425765,0.00525553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974419,0.00020458056,0.00014948561,0.000030293188,0.000029166422,0.000010427178,0.00059384,0.0000049958717,0.0015353957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925695,0.0015426276,0.0007319819,0.0004726107,0.0034692558,0.0012139915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8757942,0.04511206,0.035560846,0.0033478793,0.019098314,0.021086743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010549837,0.00018483268,0.00060093176,0.006618054,0.0012048957,0.0032956428,0.000832931,0.00046199764,0.0056892135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08210264,0.000141286,0.00049228396,0.009762985,0.0013049596,0.00094204175,0.0019498921,0.0014008451,0.0006467366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044304867,0.000056635883,0.99024135,0.000024681958,0.00007077305,0.000045714438,0.00084222853,0.00021802775,0.000050493,0.0004575295,0.0004576908,0.0074904426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004007477,0.0000341321,0.9972652,0.000014705002,0.000013939102,0.00003764215,0.0009811169,0.00015294261,0.000048377195,0.00017465596,0.0012652893,0.000007935796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13577679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17758657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99520683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004793176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008972042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26997298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158654089","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101097","title":"Weighted in‐text citations and research impact patterns: A case study of library and information science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Digital library; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Citation impact; Information science; Data science; Library science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.17294049011234358,"score_gpt":0.5023219081214956,"score_spread":0.329381418009152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158654089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904073,0.00046871652,0.0022379304,0.00065705617,0.000013029542,0.000072334486,0.00023355469,0.000029709236,0.0058805533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950275,0.00032054816,0.003571701,0.000048564612,0.00002338992,0.00004484349,0.00014562056,0.000027095393,0.00079077977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922019,0.0048957937,0.0006747087,0.00027969698,0.0016933308,0.00025462135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8454418,0.13069989,0.008792796,0.003548845,0.0102217905,0.0012948846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011087448,0.00029133895,0.00061698095,0.012025732,0.0026829715,0.004304455,0.0009930014,0.001159903,0.002499494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07674983,0.00019946687,0.00042763227,0.037478514,0.0014049527,0.003968659,0.0018760087,0.00079475425,0.0003260787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008186905,0.00186437,0.6959447,0.0015432793,0.0005398369,0.0047157654,0.061666995,0.005488749,0.0034025128,0.027799595,0.0057995166,0.19041596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030043727,0.00090614904,0.7572384,0.00053162867,0.0006756294,0.0042432174,0.10692265,0.044178408,0.00945687,0.04160676,0.033718515,0.00022137564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011740184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01816602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002762154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016603786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058636725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158857852","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2013.772879","title":"Evaluating research – peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Economic Papers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tertiary Education Commission; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Weighting; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7149813458606749,"score_gpt":0.6179681557462509,"score_spread":0.097013190114424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158857852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95484835,0.0009100799,0.0056510065,0.0022484078,0.00012998114,0.00029756495,0.00074259867,0.00009741434,0.035074618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117273,0.00041663076,0.0041144537,0.00006473407,0.000063344116,0.00014954845,0.00067335676,0.000036700992,0.0033085104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90261716,0.0187535,0.012095174,0.0032970782,0.06113385,0.0021032465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73932385,0.047545012,0.085034676,0.008362178,0.11322942,0.0065048235],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06998725,0.00052971573,0.0011442008,0.0117170485,0.0015283929,0.005442715,0.0013515423,0.00083497615,0.0015249925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25480673,0.00032069336,0.0006996415,0.014576618,0.0021572835,0.0041910666,0.005491647,0.0013906255,0.0005950936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007218746,0.00019325191,0.7668763,0.0007648993,0.0006569055,0.00022834554,0.021307668,0.0033944435,0.002649126,0.0044728527,0.0047440287,0.19399028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040829815,0.000516261,0.975625,0.00015102993,0.00013015584,0.00015273328,0.006748833,0.0034026387,0.0024967752,0.0013194068,0.009328531,0.00008785242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038066953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045008678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007928763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007682775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3701324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159807730","doi":"10.1162/leon_a_00780","title":"Hybrids Are Hubs: Transdisciplinarity, the Two Cultures and the Special Status of Artscientists","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leonardo","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; The arts; Sociology; Computer science; Visual arts; Epistemology; Social science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2731534115275208,"score_gpt":0.5273399428156164,"score_spread":0.25418653128809554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159807730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93162274,0.00583437,0.0066349786,0.0061715976,0.00009960804,0.000027249042,0.00038088651,0.00004605045,0.04918247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996906,0.0007488882,0.0008041159,0.00013090888,0.0000407948,0.000012381711,0.00011159726,0.000010051975,0.0012353134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713045,0.0010294397,0.00014574808,0.00061047653,0.00073639594,0.00034754974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802311,0.011731365,0.003731695,0.00096307776,0.0015985755,0.0017441831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043165893,0.00025101105,0.00056872226,0.008250304,0.0022521087,0.009334021,0.0005153256,0.00092771597,0.0072485856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01917317,0.00020411242,0.00031861346,0.01095876,0.0040619504,0.00982503,0.003997152,0.00068266003,0.0004372246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062031206,0.000095574964,0.43523934,0.0008305404,0.000538688,0.000881394,0.052925266,0.00078322116,0.003142009,0.3042082,0.0046164216,0.19611906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009453886,0.0001492033,0.44308254,0.0009916298,0.00066103105,0.0010813869,0.1492652,0.0032929352,0.0022871317,0.32633334,0.072631225,0.00012980153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029253587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00423419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016141075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024248898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160622038","doi":"10.3905/jot.2009.4.3.087","title":"TCA Benchmarks: <i>One or Many?</i>","year":2009,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Trading","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadians Living with HIV","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Simplicity; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Trading strategy; Database transaction; Econometrics; Business; Economics; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.6057244644135725,"score_gpt":0.554667195559239,"score_spread":0.05105726885433348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160622038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02838401,0.055466004,0.3433968,0.22710076,0.021073975,0.0015121949,0.008461601,0.005784352,0.30882025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4514568,0.025757326,0.40926117,0.039619993,0.010755621,0.004079023,0.009440463,0.0031780417,0.04645157],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.955369,0.020318573,0.00366253,0.0015509999,0.017910695,0.0011881149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9165124,0.029962413,0.007409031,0.008937781,0.03466079,0.0025175093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036061797,0.0017368261,0.0017316056,0.008188274,0.002187932,0.01821805,0.0042068656,0.0038200738,0.011401058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13336945,0.0005633042,0.0012324067,0.017755376,0.0038460663,0.014849851,0.003978493,0.00464771,0.0066944207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023051637,0.00022393823,0.007521073,0.0012563067,0.00016744804,0.00009022004,0.00066041114,0.0034632985,0.0008449483,0.32343695,0.32994696,0.33215785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015464453,0.0005366719,0.01054826,0.0036421614,0.00016074038,0.00031536532,0.0030878715,0.03000436,0.0032242616,0.47289774,0.47503564,0.00039224836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058357595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008568828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036061797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005722775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049732686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19071525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161109463","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2008.08.005","title":"What Weight Does Impact Factor Carry?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Dietetic Association","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Tempest; Quarter (Canadian coin); Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.33075860097685605,"score_gpt":0.5342452079784407,"score_spread":0.2034866070015846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161109463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7855798,0.034198657,0.03595011,0.049177226,0.007621564,0.00015964593,0.0031289621,0.0006354999,0.08354856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98374635,0.0071905516,0.003306323,0.00097648485,0.0020521292,0.000029598972,0.00046834722,0.00012679465,0.002103422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689746,0.00059453933,0.00025557514,0.00032783562,0.0016297337,0.00029478557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719368,0.015321905,0.003719883,0.0019301646,0.0057457746,0.0013453392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056819078,0.0008925722,0.0014897883,0.0063872673,0.0009240593,0.0057077715,0.0006673049,0.0014402797,0.003442778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06598623,0.00033398808,0.001261014,0.007049609,0.0017752969,0.0060047624,0.0008971128,0.0012322494,0.0015922156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092838006,0.00022519536,0.32201493,0.0009814029,0.0021706265,0.00025363296,0.001019275,0.0011056899,0.0020439588,0.015159913,0.0131462375,0.6409508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002871878,0.0012422384,0.7394265,0.002201562,0.00460286,0.0013601824,0.008169357,0.0075881532,0.005386387,0.16580817,0.06354416,0.0003831671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056131785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99431807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014116155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015280355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030049145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161381384","doi":"10.5539/mas.v8n5p169","title":"Economic Growth and Internet Usage Impact on Publication Productivity among ASEAN’s and World’s Best Universities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Elite; Product (mathematics); Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.18551035624753337,"score_gpt":0.44481743263059337,"score_spread":0.25930707638306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161381384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919767,0.00112145,0.00008855115,0.0003971919,0.000018622197,0.00000615086,0.00086250313,0.000017308024,0.0055114827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964443,0.0010052458,0.00009742251,0.00002531544,0.000043487024,0.000009376052,0.0007225783,0.0000066988714,0.0016456686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982907,0.0004457686,0.00027350432,0.000114536466,0.0006519267,0.0002235309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722302,0.011648794,0.009614381,0.0007198057,0.003722589,0.0020643373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024924125,0.00022786269,0.00029213497,0.0054731146,0.00050712464,0.002749035,0.00029806927,0.00026450554,0.0055978107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010689843,0.00011624034,0.00060440745,0.008028204,0.00039763268,0.0015869273,0.0008479652,0.000535477,0.00088448287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007447339,0.00010989534,0.97934246,0.00008653255,0.00009306919,0.000360445,0.0004976751,0.0004800336,0.00024279393,0.00020794457,0.0009975778,0.01750699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023144257,0.00004274775,0.99659073,0.000025558998,0.00002668639,0.00016268638,0.000899467,0.0006450917,0.00021025693,0.000076691955,0.0013093033,0.00000850741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004644477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00500241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072885986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008812459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018726528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162094378","doi":"10.1007/s10645-019-09339-9","title":"Creative Careers: The Life Cycles of Nobel Laureates in Economics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Economist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institute on Aging; Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; Universiteit Maastricht; Directorate for Education and Human Resources; York University; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Dartmouth College; University of Connecticut; Ohio State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Creativity; Work (physics); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Economics; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.35685785387935437,"score_gpt":0.49313113928266655,"score_spread":0.13627328540331218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162094378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96908677,0.0021746976,0.0057064877,0.0037913332,0.000043911292,0.00007877265,0.000855561,0.000048328267,0.01821427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960049,0.00038811105,0.0005566031,0.00013320861,0.000029443301,0.00005501693,0.0004153094,0.000012123444,0.0024052626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972778,0.0009774659,0.00012180519,0.00046636,0.0004615298,0.00069500424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419209,0.030176295,0.011457841,0.0021597052,0.0033467845,0.010938498],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01026119,0.00025270326,0.000585283,0.003612934,0.0024571938,0.005710462,0.0010151134,0.0012313355,0.009550347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067450255,0.00037024324,0.0005712493,0.0024907412,0.002264666,0.0046768235,0.0042571938,0.0019214263,0.0014448666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012664333,0.00037821732,0.8026093,0.00013149295,0.00014777017,0.00032826356,0.011739578,0.0037195839,0.0005861546,0.09618396,0.0052993856,0.07760986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007243176,0.00031332296,0.76878476,0.00016338559,0.00006999203,0.00055539096,0.01597311,0.0123964315,0.00044041657,0.18635018,0.014737115,0.00014343816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028840867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041286554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99638706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018876339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014520993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05426705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163445888","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.007","title":"Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; Royal Victoria Hospital; McGill University; Concordia University; Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Peering; Consistency (knowledge bases); Peer review; Competition (biology); Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Operations research; Political science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; The Internet","score_opus":0.8991065089653524,"score_gpt":0.6875258783341166,"score_spread":0.21158063063123578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163445888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95457363,0.0064106225,0.0043592127,0.009632983,0.0005818827,0.00030514787,0.0018652639,0.00019554287,0.022075841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409986,0.0008779867,0.0016500785,0.00017297026,0.00043787714,0.00010273219,0.00036834978,0.000027915052,0.0022623155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95182806,0.02052126,0.006536916,0.0031303475,0.013787158,0.004196269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6262644,0.22746754,0.06645253,0.022012964,0.0357586,0.022043971],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031875435,0.00035580224,0.0009663215,0.0073368303,0.0024051208,0.004600466,0.0012720149,0.0017908146,0.01071529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24859595,0.0002812784,0.00078042696,0.00930253,0.0016599811,0.0019908643,0.0020870953,0.0014476894,0.0018132086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010084123,0.00026596026,0.91341245,0.00062449253,0.00031874518,0.0022044843,0.0022223275,0.00028805743,0.0026905066,0.0041035265,0.0046248534,0.06823629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445492,0.00047632985,0.9579165,0.00019727391,0.00025882493,0.0053916387,0.0023657072,0.0012104474,0.0022994948,0.012123387,0.017631032,0.00007496432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019849762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022027965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96812457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013273939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050027687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1685754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163542241","doi":"10.1108/ilds-02-2015-0004","title":"Document supply of grey literature and open access: ten years later","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Intermediation; Business; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.3749393279018769,"score_gpt":0.5661691548216926,"score_spread":0.19122982691981572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163542241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4891672,0.09711398,0.01034381,0.20863873,0.00207344,0.00031533782,0.0031167087,0.00029126566,0.18893957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560846,0.014566046,0.003260094,0.005535427,0.0010852619,0.00014288393,0.0009317745,0.00018744788,0.018206434],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95693326,0.01217907,0.004403664,0.004464899,0.01969647,0.0023226168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7344634,0.17527394,0.028777128,0.017187845,0.03555934,0.008738423],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038380094,0.0002653049,0.001018696,0.015914911,0.0039707287,0.026663493,0.0020370358,0.0035431753,0.016022997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1499704,0.0005430686,0.0008800275,0.03360313,0.01146817,0.02547191,0.010981364,0.0036952256,0.0017704093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051102816,0.00017026105,0.05422451,0.0036544409,0.00015210228,0.0023670732,0.20459756,0.00054418156,0.0011904462,0.32285315,0.028632643,0.38110256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040890984,0.00021313502,0.0889638,0.0069486336,0.00008277997,0.003088641,0.1441232,0.0010346964,0.0014339664,0.068019964,0.6859221,0.0001282378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011858076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008511532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99796295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021258635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015534179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20297581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164150962","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1050038","title":"Importance of open access for clinicians and researchers in developing countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Developing country; Institution; World Wide Web; Medical education; Computer science; Data science; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6771114568177119,"score_gpt":0.6308608858162836,"score_spread":0.046250571001428264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164150962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015157381,0.0014392283,0.00007014135,0.98856807,0.0085566,0.000003523817,0.000006690257,0.0000053329363,0.0011988761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009659164,0.0052942513,0.0006442427,0.89990735,0.08155613,0.000032393848,0.000020721385,0.000030014719,0.0028557142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96466,0.012260918,0.004172588,0.0024136053,0.013573942,0.002919062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7263579,0.1893693,0.012364238,0.0067832917,0.025677191,0.039448194],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035490196,0.0005892509,0.002146798,0.0013532669,0.008860871,0.014345058,0.003227455,0.0648286,0.0089143235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16256982,0.0008593349,0.0009849365,0.0026156004,0.016183015,0.020670777,0.007479052,0.072107196,0.003055576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044725006,0.000028164512,0.0006212295,0.00019950699,0.000013218556,0.002641584,0.00074337155,0.00004042032,0.00009856675,0.015181695,0.9626722,0.017715318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012056398,0.00007267247,0.0013882847,0.0011298974,0.000028636567,0.0051810946,0.0035580425,0.00023452923,0.00014195454,0.031829935,0.95620066,0.00011381148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004737828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012868852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00759925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015744468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18769234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164185547","doi":"10.1109/icaict.2009.5372593","title":"Delineation of landscapes of emerging sciences through publication data: A case of nanoscience in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Data science; Emerging technologies; Process (computing); Computer science; Nanotechnology; Materials science","score_opus":0.6696666563456042,"score_gpt":0.600067926031835,"score_spread":0.06959873031376917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164185547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91048324,0.0028349159,0.003786239,0.01118682,0.000019463772,0.00020273228,0.0037828807,0.00006214553,0.067641586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045116,0.0011080578,0.0049696346,0.00016230565,0.00000581179,0.00003174602,0.0006837084,0.000019230236,0.0025684184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599767,0.0008395058,0.0002576438,0.00028653024,0.0014261836,0.0011925014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862757,0.005926879,0.0014669285,0.000560819,0.00457046,0.0011992296],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032728906,0.00020787674,0.00056714483,0.0108416,0.008088928,0.0101231225,0.0015623857,0.00084255566,0.0021188306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014757913,0.00023941186,0.00043864478,0.04309316,0.004256876,0.002570929,0.003438898,0.0008927368,0.000115118186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027760508,0.000082899816,0.4538457,0.00067965785,0.00014271431,0.008794179,0.08376654,0.010564562,0.0014504927,0.31392562,0.01009372,0.11637627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084005034,0.00005327391,0.46732807,0.0012695148,0.00028591047,0.002103636,0.26384962,0.027838672,0.0022050827,0.050048072,0.18465844,0.00027571182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06389709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07007305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46360797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165122403","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z","title":"Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":506,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Bibliometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Database; Bibliographic database; Computer science; Data science; Humanities; Library science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.8593883432201264,"score_gpt":0.609782680977184,"score_spread":0.24960566224294234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165122403","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24078679,0.27474824,0.1460774,0.16705576,0.0032124873,0.00052920607,0.014713184,0.0024694288,0.15040751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81730694,0.05303284,0.110767595,0.0058230525,0.0038226822,0.0006143718,0.0058941375,0.00056886906,0.0021694882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.76480365,0.1055339,0.026355881,0.013347108,0.08669557,0.003263902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.316423,0.5012513,0.036610804,0.068794526,0.06593689,0.010983456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21179481,0.0014391855,0.0068805115,0.03238686,0.0038293737,0.04375171,0.011271657,0.004675381,0.0035346632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50791675,0.0014131449,0.0018194339,0.06568196,0.010331809,0.047272075,0.01580384,0.0045851544,0.0014055369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064258184,0.00054178404,0.07119978,0.008204056,0.002585909,0.00015677864,0.003876196,0.009439403,0.0008997864,0.22571342,0.023739023,0.65300125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027885733,0.00041620096,0.058021866,0.0109275505,0.0014924108,0.00043085346,0.007455678,0.030480232,0.0025024817,0.7635346,0.12411304,0.00034618084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011797351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014049116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96761316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009074111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016329065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165199772","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2014.906018","title":"Institutional Repository Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Bibliometrics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17762022938427158,"score_gpt":0.46057300947454993,"score_spread":0.28295278009027836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165199772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6357134,0.041695364,0.034452364,0.005752869,0.0007825218,0.004826898,0.055270314,0.0019041776,0.21960218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91847104,0.016263643,0.03254388,0.0002647837,0.00067819026,0.0021974372,0.02128035,0.0002847539,0.008015978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704544,0.0067369267,0.0034658078,0.0012506972,0.01716417,0.0009280875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9370405,0.033620592,0.008045095,0.003117143,0.016876148,0.0013004339],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016026028,0.0006068451,0.0021459667,0.22113483,0.0028149516,0.010249662,0.0016615427,0.0011394558,0.008902712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080357715,0.00034591873,0.0019581777,0.30178842,0.0013433914,0.006414254,0.0043089148,0.0006204533,0.0024041862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033697297,0.00034949536,0.34982052,0.007990243,0.0013751591,0.0007080039,0.006961953,0.004489146,0.000893828,0.0475078,0.046545606,0.53302133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018288635,0.00057391345,0.5514772,0.0042597624,0.0020815416,0.0024042937,0.03055145,0.025763514,0.0024406088,0.034662575,0.34531543,0.00028691307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054944498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003781441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044995244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068973973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084754765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165346621","doi":"10.1108/oir-11-2014-0276","title":"Factiva and Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Online Information Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Manitoba Health Research Council","keywords":"Newspaper; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.6249148270559952,"score_gpt":0.5820916801924584,"score_spread":0.04282314686353683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165346621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55766374,0.033932116,0.0013097912,0.04145692,0.0009419975,0.0016815847,0.030777691,0.00063666084,0.3315995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88976496,0.020049362,0.00497043,0.005609167,0.0002505372,0.00064376515,0.01180006,0.00023125934,0.06668055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98684675,0.0019837625,0.0009772363,0.0010174818,0.0071927668,0.0019819017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292741,0.01964366,0.006207851,0.0038064057,0.03361063,0.007457354],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008833395,0.0005418285,0.000868187,0.010907651,0.012061851,0.012833871,0.0019438779,0.0015095385,0.024397278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05695122,0.00039418085,0.0005928461,0.023393296,0.003906552,0.0038651344,0.0033411155,0.0010651656,0.0027156505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037030464,0.0004932205,0.14178821,0.006982549,0.00028900182,0.004876225,0.094744496,0.0006721436,0.0031057086,0.05123,0.27160957,0.42050588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019108667,0.00026678,0.15584433,0.0021473954,0.00023399258,0.001648044,0.08353104,0.0003345496,0.0019057582,0.0013770921,0.75228614,0.00023372941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96520454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98909235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063012935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12907834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45719296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165402917","doi":"10.1177/0011392113498866","title":"The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Centrality; Economic geography; Homogeneous; Globalization; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.6511783085238985,"score_gpt":0.6372542626474716,"score_spread":0.013924045876426816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165402917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876038,0.0035614271,0.00079963973,0.0012449067,0.0000171198,0.000010507947,0.0014142836,0.000015803147,0.005332515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828464,0.0006753844,0.00019884275,0.00004185333,0.000043738437,0.000007717105,0.0005625092,0.000005228696,0.00017988408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969548,0.001104461,0.00037030267,0.0004999289,0.0008077539,0.00026270712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9164949,0.040010083,0.03286239,0.0031302776,0.00476568,0.0027366201],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00693668,0.00021637957,0.00047626297,0.007677135,0.00070964237,0.0025058957,0.0003979721,0.00065660937,0.0017561719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0318443,0.00018137832,0.00047984076,0.014187523,0.0016862634,0.0035485327,0.0016998524,0.000574029,0.0003628048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013204812,0.00006377981,0.96897125,0.00025198114,0.00034488775,0.00022485119,0.005889723,0.0014107262,0.00036472527,0.004165562,0.0011911422,0.016989375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000647527,0.00004349117,0.99181026,0.00006210544,0.000042834876,0.00011010662,0.0021729544,0.0008369914,0.0001471119,0.0011316651,0.0036197656,0.000016153792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007828049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065100836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99232286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012148237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008463265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03668511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166615779","doi":"10.18438/b81g7j","title":"Alignment of Citation Behaviors of Philosophy Graduate Students and Faculty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Graduate students; Rank (graph theory); Library science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.45540801981991147,"score_gpt":0.5250139115162369,"score_spread":0.06960589169632542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166615779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942508,0.0009151717,0.00021927326,0.00031804002,0.000022312546,0.000015029388,0.000560303,0.000022754724,0.003676418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963923,0.0004980393,0.00038712416,0.00006592699,0.00005568822,0.000025694959,0.0008125993,0.00001197498,0.0017506616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966318,0.00069174834,0.0005159288,0.00046135578,0.001415784,0.00028325187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642531,0.011459593,0.013324094,0.0011958445,0.0079186,0.0018486565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003269587,0.00013007807,0.00029622472,0.009236472,0.00078871934,0.0023884804,0.0005340692,0.00059902837,0.0039252164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035459977,0.00014138047,0.00026718894,0.009816819,0.00049629627,0.001465828,0.0014754632,0.00043917698,0.000894193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010076433,0.00005846677,0.95128036,0.00010949471,0.000039084938,0.00008187263,0.007636611,0.00005480327,0.0008141206,0.00031777695,0.0010858569,0.03842093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033315252,0.00006800017,0.99108434,0.0000370517,0.000010430282,0.00016890724,0.005312247,0.00008702506,0.0004487904,0.00011421634,0.0026543562,0.000011339425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004772531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008528854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012090149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009592939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017291427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167860710","doi":"10.7202/1028999ar","title":"Le libre accès aux articles scientifiques : référentiels, principes, normes et modalités","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.4694380487945393,"score_gpt":0.5554607054139259,"score_spread":0.08602265661938657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167860710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059120763,0.08108837,0.17124778,0.16239256,0.0032331618,0.0002600356,0.0009733315,0.000657541,0.52102643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497639,0.039888404,0.058061622,0.009644414,0.0046812724,0.00090825243,0.0007371334,0.0004962235,0.03581884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451663,0.026060905,0.004784464,0.004579067,0.018052822,0.0013564759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.871182,0.087138385,0.010460216,0.009751649,0.01883243,0.0026354473],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030153839,0.0007300597,0.0013903606,0.021084156,0.008918352,0.045305204,0.002412329,0.006230745,0.00798671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08920926,0.0009581443,0.0009621489,0.02269264,0.037420657,0.03592732,0.010571625,0.006713793,0.001859784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016976706,0.000016256796,0.00096516614,0.00028307087,0.000016157781,0.000068515634,0.007518411,0.00011817403,0.00016325412,0.971835,0.002491847,0.016507238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028925695,0.000049694332,0.003287715,0.002008213,0.000058112473,0.0005232877,0.012453086,0.0007142849,0.0008712815,0.7027917,0.27713403,0.000079660414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070078457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005035096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013595695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012047937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15947068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168948528","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450430198","title":"The current status of Open Access in biomedical field: the comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Political science; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.2619999762952609,"score_gpt":0.5998809872742499,"score_spread":0.337881010978989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168948528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8041781,0.08922066,0.0012634881,0.038274035,0.00063051196,0.000084379906,0.0022328086,0.000047559213,0.06406842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840517,0.01299784,0.00042421036,0.0012431749,0.00021221221,0.000025262534,0.00038444114,0.000018087287,0.0006431111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851834,0.0048281215,0.0027481972,0.0011794602,0.0043974007,0.0016633976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8662454,0.054204587,0.043088447,0.0041477587,0.023769755,0.008544016],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016953405,0.00018134477,0.0006260343,0.009434765,0.0015433899,0.007945729,0.0009507037,0.0011793374,0.004329372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061439354,0.00021252918,0.00078108686,0.014658571,0.0041874046,0.0059567867,0.0033257676,0.0013035578,0.00036806328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008883121,0.00020708024,0.71498454,0.003739185,0.00049503567,0.00074966706,0.011829921,0.00059622934,0.0010113989,0.04972754,0.006775233,0.20899591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027605125,0.00017593124,0.9304417,0.0026203494,0.00018541823,0.0007610721,0.024731971,0.00023043454,0.00057648704,0.0039439346,0.036221612,0.00008355534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010109271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061666067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031708917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005077538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08965927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169058265","doi":"10.1177/1098214009354774","title":"Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; Canadian Cancer Society","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Documentation; Management science; Medical education; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8412037386951862,"score_gpt":0.6852424986880619,"score_spread":0.1559612400071243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169058265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28626028,0.01945312,0.14367837,0.09588692,0.0007570921,0.0030992175,0.0019050362,0.0009810205,0.44797897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89154816,0.004842841,0.097942874,0.0006138059,0.00013085935,0.0005940086,0.0002954428,0.00011547153,0.0039165667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8053959,0.114331774,0.007320051,0.0026366904,0.06422172,0.006093888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7692756,0.14812052,0.010351466,0.0068327137,0.061299916,0.004119823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10130114,0.0010093292,0.0016862112,0.022718403,0.012860315,0.019328484,0.0028948395,0.0026985905,0.0012608333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20668185,0.00057137205,0.0009884005,0.066737324,0.010867776,0.0075008417,0.006294741,0.002863382,0.00029962833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003033713,0.00027911915,0.064731576,0.0036071236,0.0003252834,0.002933453,0.060327683,0.018925965,0.0012621939,0.4977456,0.02436499,0.32519373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002921967,0.0006480977,0.14084741,0.007246402,0.00072993577,0.0021127213,0.14804275,0.11275716,0.0062162546,0.208373,0.37184858,0.0008854733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6881527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70240825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100291386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12122389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72766834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169420254","doi":"10.1002/asi.23286","title":"Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of <scp>M</scp>endeley user categories","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Citation; Altmetrics; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Informetrics; Computer science; Library science; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.4475581076986923,"score_gpt":0.5463816071200864,"score_spread":0.09882349942139412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169420254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150673,0.0014294864,0.0060800035,0.0010289795,0.000097790384,0.000505251,0.04158137,0.0013227196,0.032887064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96499425,0.000384271,0.009275688,0.00014192585,0.00015344878,0.00079817424,0.01824263,0.00028396747,0.0057256944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749315,0.0066052517,0.0042254827,0.0016883041,0.011069017,0.0014805422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7296072,0.16304876,0.05310982,0.0112793315,0.03836725,0.0045876843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016982283,0.0005878838,0.0008238342,0.036665067,0.001437257,0.004412664,0.001163521,0.0008561564,0.007906802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15713114,0.00022269286,0.00087574474,0.044425532,0.0009054431,0.0039714286,0.0037198616,0.00074461167,0.002797215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004340837,0.00011901959,0.8777363,0.00091706053,0.0003725751,0.00028572182,0.008722912,0.0005608999,0.0012389974,0.0040855673,0.017954947,0.08757188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022523694,0.00020441522,0.9391537,0.00025562823,0.000106500636,0.00063381525,0.00928808,0.0062258756,0.0015694471,0.0030057023,0.039424077,0.00011022664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054562516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005910738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98301774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014868482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011975174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08981198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171257228","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n2a86","title":"Availability and Accessibility of Research Outputs in NARS: A case study with IARI","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Work (physics); New delhi; Open access journal; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine; Geography; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7214859327264074,"score_gpt":0.6436624978410018,"score_spread":0.07782343488540555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171257228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750363,0.00088159577,0.0007621471,0.0012708964,0.000015218437,0.000073633775,0.00095364964,0.00007948728,0.020927047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947482,0.0009810757,0.0011840592,0.00010046287,0.000028331988,0.00005888125,0.00074697693,0.000039938815,0.0021121134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877935,0.0051918477,0.001722766,0.001156985,0.0030099705,0.0011250828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957481,0.059026495,0.020817436,0.008079388,0.011697032,0.004631556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012611255,0.0002607375,0.0006119486,0.010576066,0.002601074,0.006085203,0.0019540351,0.0008795287,0.0043484806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046938043,0.00032040733,0.00042922422,0.028064042,0.0016992812,0.004792103,0.005080112,0.0010858828,0.0013179322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005875853,0.00060219655,0.6978219,0.0012719871,0.00016464292,0.012051808,0.16949965,0.001629616,0.0033848484,0.0070508868,0.0047634966,0.10117142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002629193,0.0003267744,0.70330673,0.0006055081,0.00009324374,0.006516988,0.22975114,0.0027003174,0.0017246878,0.0018195153,0.053008214,0.000120647725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014476028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017028444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039383597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026226668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06669551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171824286","doi":"10.1142/s1363919614500376","title":"INCORPORATING NETWORK ANALYSIS INTO EVALUATION OF 'BIG SCIENCE' PROJECTS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CANADIAN LIGHT SOURCE SYNCHROTRON","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Genome Prairie; Genome Canada; Canadian Light Source","keywords":"CLs upper limits; Social network analysis; Government (linguistics); Big data; Scale (ratio); Scientific instrument; Network science; Work (physics); Data science; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Social media; Telecommunications; Engineering; Complex network; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.358731749205141,"score_gpt":0.5731939792993171,"score_spread":0.21446223009417614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171824286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85103357,0.003332647,0.014771542,0.017671807,0.0002177862,0.002361583,0.0033138376,0.00038718252,0.10690999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98608726,0.0010331923,0.00924858,0.00024943898,0.000035627436,0.0004010339,0.0007894164,0.00004549975,0.002109936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9265699,0.027006332,0.0024204624,0.0018570934,0.038712565,0.0034336776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7571916,0.097549684,0.01812483,0.0068712514,0.10747707,0.012785645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083733395,0.0007238756,0.00078047236,0.011302185,0.007245704,0.00861216,0.0030380373,0.0013858672,0.0020623638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17939343,0.00038828613,0.00060458895,0.018327098,0.0030000985,0.0052551683,0.0050008274,0.00088065455,0.0002950637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012673013,0.00054164877,0.46795028,0.002490601,0.00068512495,0.00051448337,0.027205644,0.026595613,0.0013904889,0.044650592,0.025732765,0.40097544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020353158,0.001207907,0.74346995,0.0015471873,0.00043257888,0.00018103787,0.05895579,0.09836337,0.0026884316,0.01562531,0.07695265,0.00037222763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7889238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8292955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06061976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07261917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4428298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172274519","doi":"10.1186/1747-5341-2-31","title":"Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Order (exchange); Public relations; Open access publishing; Publishing; Research ethics; Public access; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.9706059074024417,"score_gpt":0.7823262368663919,"score_spread":0.18827967053604977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172274519","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010893985,0.01702635,0.0011135578,0.27067423,0.7088535,0.000011627067,0.000021920334,0.000038711343,0.00215122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002712654,0.01126337,0.00066718773,0.08472165,0.89679646,0.00003264066,0.000014757136,0.00004963895,0.0037416208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702526,0.01240799,0.0031852135,0.0018540466,0.011430449,0.00086966227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413374,0.13553481,0.0031487744,0.0024370719,0.01374012,0.0038018941],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019601528,0.0019174014,0.003630175,0.0018054137,0.0041454975,0.013882129,0.0036158878,0.024999704,0.0019587611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08158053,0.000908397,0.0016553301,0.0017581936,0.019871434,0.010029446,0.0029585767,0.046576943,0.0015906844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015659723,0.000010661858,0.00004171687,0.00034973508,0.000021274851,0.00022455525,0.0002883575,0.000048890575,0.000035134086,0.011386707,0.978203,0.009374229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025253616,0.000016848897,0.0001948312,0.0008396201,0.000023944533,0.00054792303,0.00030323316,0.00026291792,0.00007456434,0.022561321,0.97511035,0.000039150807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012605812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003271289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039275703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062652337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10366398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177922050","doi":"10.16995/olh.72","title":"Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Library of Humanities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Birkbeck, University of London; Swansea University; University of Bristol; University of Aberdeen; Bangor University; Queen's University Belfast; Loughborough University; Ulster University; University of Birmingham; University of Glasgow; University of Sussex; European Commission; University of Leeds; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Newcastle University; University of Reading; University of Dundee; University of Bath; University of Warwick; University of Oxford; King's College London; University of St Andrews; University of Leicester; University of Exeter; University of Hull; University of Nottingham; Queen's University; University of East Anglia; Oxford Brookes University; University of Salford Manchester; Durham University; York University; Imperial College London; Queen Mary University of London; Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Obstacle; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Financial modeling; Underpinning; Financial services; Finance; Business; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.7697619440407077,"score_gpt":0.5354388920022558,"score_spread":0.23432305203845194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177922050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05913221,0.0036988896,0.38866982,0.30687803,0.0029179007,0.002366261,0.021171631,0.03130177,0.18386348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62486523,0.0045544007,0.30321825,0.008707753,0.004077501,0.0037312403,0.018880948,0.0044995975,0.0274652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95599115,0.022412864,0.004757795,0.0046896976,0.009809398,0.002339091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6739405,0.16485657,0.030639863,0.08982162,0.028261673,0.012479782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061638497,0.0005853656,0.0012496314,0.01424956,0.0079552485,0.033139084,0.0056107575,0.007365954,0.03680587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2282274,0.0017809311,0.0012169373,0.02215021,0.008696808,0.06130871,0.02515186,0.007205049,0.014100841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005143918,0.00043334044,0.014086521,0.0009475827,0.00007803078,0.0003595497,0.012283852,0.0038506277,0.0014766194,0.5020119,0.16513462,0.2988229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022951908,0.00014264353,0.008159492,0.001971891,0.00008270279,0.00030690868,0.0050164554,0.02024648,0.0036788762,0.3498087,0.61004144,0.00031493604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076148584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003118395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99438924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009279439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027574796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3259794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181670068","doi":"","title":"THE DIVERSITY OF ONTARIO'S UNIVERSITIES: A Data Set to Inform the Differentiation Discussion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5763901703785713,"score_gpt":0.5139593011093159,"score_spread":0.06243086926925545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181670068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409624,0.0009979734,0.00054232974,0.0017818178,0.000020082389,0.00009923293,0.02934303,0.000021609068,0.026231548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893941,0.00042461263,0.0006450957,0.00012118182,0.000017030161,0.000061681014,0.006811659,0.000011370626,0.0025132333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943205,0.0004444156,0.00033036148,0.00047291734,0.0032713385,0.0011603942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97080076,0.0055971066,0.0052556437,0.0014129464,0.012922695,0.0040108114],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033509426,0.00026135097,0.0006824151,0.0122352,0.0057084695,0.003684149,0.0013366014,0.00068402494,0.0028128377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020016903,0.00025565716,0.00048654887,0.03879869,0.0018498931,0.0018379837,0.0024540643,0.0006480143,0.00041391267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014526567,0.00004071138,0.9537029,0.00027574887,0.00012920849,0.0001863342,0.013853154,0.0007844155,0.0005901213,0.006234633,0.0090794,0.014977974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013779175,0.000016506445,0.97174996,0.000070200476,0.000044888387,0.00004569117,0.009217195,0.0004737152,0.00019661548,0.0006189953,0.017531728,0.000020729603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99218655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04864503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06516184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3529461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183035778","doi":"","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration? Evidence from the Collapse of the Soviet Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soviet union; Political science; Field (mathematics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.47957700236991097,"score_gpt":0.5621005811009048,"score_spread":0.08252357873099381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183035778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98795485,0.0016512804,0.00026750236,0.0018800321,0.000014357768,0.0000054846414,0.0002707764,0.000012833354,0.007942995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872166,0.0006749823,0.000051078292,0.00005458568,0.000028777278,0.0000028744296,0.00014626635,0.000002209862,0.00031743478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752396,0.00065421796,0.00026310317,0.0003830809,0.0004927749,0.00068283285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140814,0.030718323,0.039259315,0.0044109966,0.0039911363,0.0075388337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004602275,0.00019915975,0.000471461,0.0032687355,0.0011452618,0.0025655169,0.0006464574,0.00084645406,0.007401305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035232104,0.00023506499,0.00043175166,0.0051348833,0.0023360937,0.0025084955,0.0036151407,0.0008326426,0.0006872519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058643275,0.00018284842,0.9369603,0.00019052035,0.00023042347,0.00035168877,0.0032021226,0.0018384062,0.00029873295,0.005269707,0.0013935511,0.04949533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034113527,0.00013153587,0.99034494,0.00010275883,0.000046792396,0.000096959426,0.0027925458,0.00044475144,0.0002605004,0.0028855891,0.002847867,0.000011574786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009485623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006206337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001269957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017504768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024759889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187745483","doi":"10.1893/0005-3155-86.1.38","title":"Publish your work and shape public policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BIOS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Work (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.8268935791649942,"score_gpt":0.5975813027778658,"score_spread":0.22931227638712837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187745483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004410276,0.003849214,0.0050926753,0.82495064,0.025629852,0.00008210167,0.00048869423,0.00036138625,0.13513514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2945417,0.017542096,0.013097187,0.33977127,0.07440521,0.0006077227,0.0011278685,0.0017017919,0.2572052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600819,0.013681073,0.0021487772,0.0023334592,0.01682191,0.0049327635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7784092,0.102255896,0.016639017,0.028041668,0.03193914,0.042715073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058603138,0.0010075009,0.0018702263,0.008710611,0.008827358,0.051886212,0.003324734,0.031442173,0.06722603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28055128,0.0011647585,0.001281784,0.008670431,0.014104268,0.033675037,0.0136282,0.015659753,0.04720515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011374853,0.00026999458,0.004195944,0.0003169765,0.000134376,0.00026650444,0.0018796157,0.0005176521,0.000343258,0.37609428,0.5296341,0.08623352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083549836,0.000033943546,0.0014274179,0.00045594826,0.000051726547,0.0000834569,0.0017125885,0.000541736,0.0007885096,0.4829634,0.5117924,0.00006529463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029308046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039449288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008969138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03499309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188594066","doi":"","title":"Grants, contracts and networks : What influences biotechnology scientific production","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Position (finance); Production (economics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Bibliometrics; Political science; Business; Economics; Library science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Microeconomics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.10272172311357791,"score_gpt":0.39698438326619945,"score_spread":0.29426266015262154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188594066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557659,0.0015927765,0.0007718352,0.0026432255,0.00002328914,0.000042171905,0.0005562232,0.0000248782,0.038579803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747294,0.00053963665,0.00030094854,0.00003902629,0.000030060502,0.000009370304,0.00014842059,0.0000072980943,0.001452258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398273,0.002104286,0.0003022009,0.0003776044,0.0025396678,0.0006936156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92453647,0.041970167,0.01836029,0.0015905441,0.0069364067,0.0066061285],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005920505,0.00025047603,0.00040161595,0.003775297,0.0012863954,0.004549058,0.00058490905,0.00066412886,0.0055546034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0603038,0.00012691977,0.0002620751,0.009307788,0.001477136,0.0035414398,0.0017644548,0.00053697225,0.000502586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025214275,0.00017812745,0.9168116,0.00015957316,0.00017942149,0.00021349502,0.0020899144,0.0039267614,0.0004646358,0.0074391766,0.0019162335,0.066368945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037435493,0.000088727225,0.9768685,0.00009494336,0.00014615413,0.00011443075,0.0036837016,0.0038443191,0.00057164655,0.004991635,0.009524627,0.00003399785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0960353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11010911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007753167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009116143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1909526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191930442","doi":"10.1186/s40409-015-0050-7","title":"CEVAP Journal: the first Brazilian electronic scientific publication turns 20 years old","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic journal; Library science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Computer science; Free access","score_opus":0.2921335545626442,"score_gpt":0.4622507825611149,"score_spread":0.17011722799847068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191930442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028316418,0.2067214,0.0054826573,0.28770545,0.23905903,0.00024620965,0.0026323257,0.0019110185,0.25341028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077081114,0.32600737,0.013168005,0.075447954,0.15478587,0.00044526352,0.0034456933,0.004046031,0.34557277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858973,0.0020891665,0.0013234251,0.0015102426,0.008019493,0.0011603438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476657,0.008734164,0.0039354265,0.0036216157,0.026016068,0.010026922],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012344707,0.0012449678,0.0015676357,0.009714397,0.006035576,0.024788626,0.002142619,0.006457613,0.06682588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05056879,0.0008769797,0.00085310504,0.00909939,0.0051917024,0.012776799,0.006955418,0.005620836,0.03948554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053170526,0.000027878219,0.00066706754,0.0013196738,0.000015232362,0.0005621479,0.0013989145,0.000045160115,0.0009810225,0.053575546,0.74081916,0.20053513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017194268,0.0000063915536,0.00029718413,0.00039278186,0.0000032291316,0.00028812094,0.00016257641,0.000013839067,0.00012291025,0.0015833336,0.99711835,0.000009500419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004171284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005095064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062846467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016760623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22355485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193586313","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.1257727.v1","title":"My experiences with open access publishing as an early-career researcher?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8895854941582424,"score_gpt":0.6538385036355054,"score_spread":0.23574699052273695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193586313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18133204,0.01981699,0.0025759717,0.673346,0.02495599,0.000113189795,0.00030470095,0.00028016572,0.09727507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6755236,0.019715348,0.0035596278,0.11980632,0.009571518,0.0002718906,0.000335287,0.0005787376,0.17063768],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97358614,0.017944068,0.00060109276,0.0010283411,0.0039455188,0.0028949305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89169186,0.029067993,0.005260961,0.0024736344,0.008987535,0.06251807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0310023,0.00042780678,0.00077994,0.0015665665,0.022039613,0.03588948,0.0028783784,0.0070163487,0.030864842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07841458,0.00052241376,0.0006646636,0.0036547417,0.009162901,0.023513505,0.01517836,0.011981791,0.008025854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027749984,0.00034454337,0.009772427,0.00045970586,0.000040627496,0.004913038,0.5317191,0.00005870793,0.00056770915,0.02906532,0.33742484,0.08535647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024015595,0.00013925091,0.0013245373,0.00040320287,0.000010552254,0.0017650522,0.46259525,0.000054650038,0.0001771565,0.0040167095,0.52944505,0.00004451227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002085342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006776093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99712163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034601334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069087213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16395777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193695151","doi":"10.7554/elife.11326","title":"What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Epidemiology; Global health; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Health care; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.6205947355845655,"score_gpt":0.6640031884035017,"score_spread":0.04340845281893624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193695151","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035284513,0.010544815,0.00022470603,0.095978685,0.89257795,0.000017603139,0.000054929842,0.000048641155,0.00051736285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051217846,0.010596526,0.00035132945,0.04590989,0.94008774,0.000030961677,0.0000321724,0.00006141062,0.0024178147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565961,0.009802074,0.0082626995,0.003026386,0.020606019,0.001706829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8148121,0.105914816,0.0098740375,0.0036700577,0.054187212,0.011541783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05261349,0.0037267033,0.008199058,0.011493329,0.0057616886,0.02254499,0.0073359134,0.027692506,0.011694024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2236557,0.0024551956,0.0049953186,0.0076508247,0.008580093,0.010169485,0.004214203,0.030484788,0.0075641107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005515743,0.000014106956,0.000083183,0.00090950425,0.00013786105,0.00014032908,0.000056358713,0.000033551998,0.000027413816,0.000837986,0.98749965,0.010204768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017664162,0.000038295064,0.0005086878,0.003283418,0.00037967635,0.0004128179,0.00023546275,0.00021739269,0.00014102491,0.0058527812,0.98868376,0.000069969494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039376956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121807335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073851794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012627528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27825004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201280991","doi":"10.2310/8000.2011.110496","title":"An award and a legacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.8032558773760292,"score_gpt":0.5934932109726336,"score_spread":0.20976266640339558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201280991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037279883,0.0072878343,0.00072733295,0.7928249,0.10505083,0.000024291146,0.00012467174,0.000082872386,0.09014921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1310074,0.008104062,0.0016667823,0.3438512,0.060712576,0.00007641022,0.00027864132,0.00028664753,0.4540162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96480334,0.005827782,0.001476619,0.0028813195,0.017898634,0.007112293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90591824,0.0071983077,0.002116348,0.0061589708,0.023178523,0.05542964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030615458,0.0007444995,0.0017553705,0.004236183,0.018872838,0.031834424,0.0028547037,0.01606323,0.037120666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08589911,0.0005135018,0.001062481,0.0036224686,0.015574082,0.020319734,0.016455274,0.02463774,0.0117712235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004022273,0.00007971061,0.0011252566,0.000044899527,0.000021010695,0.00020035557,0.0010431311,0.000027702186,0.00008351314,0.22430143,0.73057,0.04246268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018223667,0.000028869179,0.00079844194,0.00010945572,0.000009376376,0.00017238912,0.0015036463,0.000050029586,0.00004100302,0.041421726,0.9558178,0.000029037834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015835935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041704047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037120666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011844797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039080143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16191196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201403049","doi":"","title":"Évaluation de l'incidence du financement public de la recherche universitaire québécoise dans le domaine de la biotechnologie","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30438977219610047,"score_gpt":0.44414039281234635,"score_spread":0.13975062061624588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201403049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88871056,0.008121278,0.002744019,0.00716384,0.0001515272,0.00027296468,0.011210256,0.00014028027,0.08148544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729743,0.0029731991,0.0014629359,0.00029010323,0.000042619093,0.00019004816,0.0033116015,0.000038985327,0.01871616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98149776,0.0037062124,0.0012377362,0.0015004316,0.009735967,0.0023218812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023492,0.028973358,0.016174663,0.002844137,0.04436936,0.005289252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390416,0.00038522336,0.0010236991,0.010470093,0.0026901823,0.0068766093,0.0011699225,0.0009769305,0.011250765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05764006,0.00033842938,0.0008568819,0.020348769,0.0014771727,0.0025231314,0.0026816041,0.0011663439,0.0012286426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003843002,0.00011728433,0.8569094,0.0012155424,0.000600701,0.0004961343,0.008900017,0.0020877058,0.0010810588,0.012412149,0.014988946,0.1008068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001726542,0.00008765027,0.95240253,0.0005652314,0.00018121228,0.00012672765,0.009768526,0.0017828617,0.0008467655,0.0004963126,0.033680975,0.000043888016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72251356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72408366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031279203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033409182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55824125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206192201","doi":"","title":"Altmetrics: present and future","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Scientometrics; Data science; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; World Wide Web; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5604869580800869,"score_gpt":0.5795037459923841,"score_spread":0.019016787912297217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206192201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013417024,0.15883838,0.15150645,0.5657448,0.013921488,0.00048200053,0.0063142767,0.016592287,0.073183276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.120796055,0.15554675,0.63357085,0.025851853,0.027351236,0.0019375759,0.011805497,0.0048473594,0.018292783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95597523,0.022553232,0.0033397481,0.0030236966,0.013823551,0.0012845631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7502449,0.1201578,0.01396047,0.02551398,0.06501081,0.025112007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14274648,0.0022220206,0.0023765166,0.025160618,0.004164276,0.021146057,0.005318904,0.0064065224,0.014845805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17468302,0.0012248585,0.0018043735,0.048515037,0.012080435,0.050931737,0.008844608,0.00818987,0.008897198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000246312,0.00024780104,0.010397028,0.0012089143,0.00009281465,0.0000845037,0.0014595549,0.00083708303,0.00054862,0.14898603,0.15754636,0.67834496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004134623,0.00016427765,0.008145878,0.0024431404,0.000038658596,0.00017173825,0.0018478585,0.005807889,0.00053877156,0.13498606,0.8456363,0.00017806627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046555717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003577359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065861144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013663254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75492454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212616545","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0139005","title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medical journal; Categorization; Medicine; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Library science; Univariate; Meta-analysis; Impact factor; Computer science; Family medicine; Statistics; Pathology; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.9232797035653724,"score_gpt":0.610283124809877,"score_spread":0.31299657875549536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212616545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95689136,0.019481404,0.001486937,0.00065361714,0.000098467186,0.000101883554,0.015571373,0.00010875993,0.005606191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985297,0.00467856,0.0020015822,0.00007432022,0.0002541045,0.000088072804,0.0067778095,0.000024833074,0.0008038043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896868,0.0017487885,0.0035405064,0.0012580558,0.0034130677,0.00035292437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.883992,0.03897161,0.052826054,0.004431917,0.017466374,0.002312052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630926,0.0003167774,0.0007996019,0.040208187,0.00059752073,0.0022432182,0.00061326433,0.00044145927,0.0029554977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0449149,0.00022310154,0.00085656106,0.05347012,0.00055379246,0.0034407238,0.0013777456,0.00027194712,0.0008160329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102023434,0.000033800185,0.9586091,0.0012316983,0.00035281802,0.0001767217,0.0006228861,0.00021457972,0.0007040866,0.00022844224,0.0011508706,0.036572874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048728475,0.000087188804,0.99379236,0.0002718998,0.00010685185,0.0007939241,0.00059083867,0.00020881646,0.00035016914,0.00015315924,0.0036280288,0.000011951572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017845843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99955857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088266854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017370104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035068095},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2225957876","doi":"","title":"Bibliography of the members of the Royal Society of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3622542954131648,"score_gpt":0.4824579846372291,"score_spread":0.12020368922406433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225957876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003486341,0.34191218,0.0015717894,0.021698954,0.04512902,0.00021897297,0.009273186,0.000490183,0.5793571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023463136,0.18040389,0.0019771694,0.0023384327,0.0063077346,0.00014152417,0.003950833,0.00034602982,0.80218804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604505,0.00021717684,0.000258978,0.00031396883,0.0029002556,0.000264529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882017,0.00071171,0.00027072112,0.00044953625,0.009490204,0.00087621086],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026573287,0.0022001036,0.00289134,0.024587685,0.0054696016,0.00937316,0.0023400823,0.0025358675,0.13226786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008315086,0.00090746663,0.00086690777,0.03884278,0.0020732908,0.0037166271,0.0025224604,0.0026622785,0.07952515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005095872,0.0000046669193,0.000026589416,0.00021031102,0.0000027210763,0.000014061796,0.00003805287,0.00004741676,0.00002702754,0.0024098586,0.96352637,0.03368797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010693499,9.802282e-7,0.00012558764,0.00016207642,0.0000024648784,0.000017001823,0.000018905614,0.00001059807,0.000011467456,0.00034657167,0.9992995,0.000003760685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.542921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7169267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024447897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056566797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91954166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226524777","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x","title":"How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Production (economics); Relation (database); Impact factor; Statistical analysis; Business; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7558819682205911,"score_gpt":0.6277056305859157,"score_spread":0.1281763376346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226524777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90006524,0.00843443,0.0580521,0.010072165,0.0008180346,0.0007342566,0.002537368,0.00053630624,0.01875016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021554,0.0005174462,0.0067040217,0.00032943557,0.000257957,0.00033349884,0.00034305625,0.00009378389,0.0012053471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360216,0.042069804,0.0047976887,0.0036459577,0.0107307555,0.0027341358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48326135,0.4494806,0.027308168,0.015370689,0.01833891,0.0062402585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.072990805,0.00090888626,0.002204857,0.008181767,0.00140546,0.0050727134,0.001357792,0.0015022713,0.00529628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29522282,0.00035163082,0.0050073513,0.01791424,0.0031739948,0.0037884258,0.0023814416,0.0024312239,0.00072797964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029272225,0.00053264014,0.8267071,0.0012805997,0.009071062,0.00048956036,0.0013584926,0.0060698017,0.0019028266,0.01762031,0.005323319,0.126717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030634677,0.0029383765,0.8940915,0.00040600033,0.007937859,0.00051291566,0.003334938,0.03072362,0.0027201767,0.043256808,0.013596675,0.00017472717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003681827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029288144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99181825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002174372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008236639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860169},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2226862351","doi":"10.5860/crl-254","title":"A Review of Citation Analysis Methodologies for Collection Management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Citation analysis; Data science; Management science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.9446759520364565,"score_gpt":0.7177435534688097,"score_spread":0.2269323985676468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226862351","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038496932,0.97813433,0.011332621,0.003389223,0.0007662128,0.00025117412,0.00018821476,0.00009516,0.0054580425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026779976,0.97181016,0.022751138,0.00078991207,0.00043540628,0.00045719655,0.00017686779,0.000041447558,0.00085991365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96734446,0.012898952,0.006470218,0.001426867,0.011482886,0.00037672126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8833743,0.07349962,0.0063704588,0.003436087,0.032640677,0.0006788749],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040273137,0.0018744878,0.0031896373,0.040318035,0.0024807232,0.0071040425,0.0035206422,0.0026944024,0.00478336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09210237,0.0014741773,0.0022414546,0.05564449,0.0025589971,0.009092875,0.0023561239,0.0027381189,0.0036824292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140493,0.00004356602,0.00047907568,0.03593394,0.00016592846,0.0000890345,0.0006917479,0.00031483427,0.0004031072,0.014083536,0.022677971,0.92509586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021634189,0.00008987001,0.0030090816,0.06256592,0.00046934243,0.00067578483,0.000916006,0.00044129574,0.0009988694,0.017291512,0.91341007,0.000110582485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006116386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010159841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070661935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015236846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2129873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W222776613","doi":"","title":"Early Findings from Humanities-Indicators Project Are Unveiled at Montreal Meeting.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œchronicle of higher education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Digital humanities; Higher education; Humanities; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.22617071649039294,"score_gpt":0.48442479041215225,"score_spread":0.2582540739217593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W222776613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036656704,0.015034627,0.010980063,0.30581832,0.014704597,0.0026443424,0.23340882,0.0022532882,0.37849915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37330303,0.019919967,0.034969825,0.060898703,0.005105613,0.004744336,0.1693057,0.002103092,0.32964978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345757,0.002609327,0.00059179723,0.0010830921,0.0098381955,0.0024200364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91468716,0.016071333,0.003711353,0.0027320075,0.049220726,0.013577359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021216596,0.0010762741,0.0005759965,0.012598597,0.0041886116,0.006428231,0.0017008916,0.0014061179,0.02436807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064022414,0.00046876352,0.00061811693,0.019761601,0.0019449363,0.002921559,0.0040855855,0.0043547116,0.005107852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015507576,0.000061384,0.02449269,0.00052913016,0.000033912595,0.0001259452,0.0017547644,0.000107024265,0.00051749137,0.016946826,0.9030347,0.052241042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019970592,0.00006388743,0.20140062,0.00036718496,0.00004100682,0.00003755655,0.0035882175,0.00015360388,0.0016431961,0.0013388467,0.79127055,0.00007532159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6801283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8028806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023400867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04115067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.643511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227822771","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12123","title":"Citation‐Capture Rates for Economics Journals: Do they Differ from Other Disciplines and Does it Matter?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Proxy (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; CITES; Multidisciplinary approach; Social Sciences Citation Index; Citation impact; Hard and soft science; Impact factor; Social science; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Science Citation Index; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.24200280402426164,"score_gpt":0.4826729206852766,"score_spread":0.24067011666101498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227822771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564664,0.015829975,0.0040832274,0.0041052364,0.00023639105,0.00007887389,0.0021806723,0.00018439077,0.016834905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996181,0.0014334276,0.00042654303,0.00031296498,0.00022393088,0.000021968794,0.0007409856,0.000049566403,0.00060962857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869518,0.0042255446,0.0016505042,0.001951774,0.0039529377,0.0012675073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79511935,0.116731286,0.053396013,0.01552239,0.015155556,0.0040753842],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023446187,0.00039147038,0.0013642495,0.012173512,0.00079984614,0.005154762,0.0014011413,0.0015996782,0.002925107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17820846,0.00028097662,0.0013009822,0.0128652975,0.0018425628,0.0049643978,0.0021253566,0.0013448725,0.0017317606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030979133,0.00008201751,0.94496536,0.00033000179,0.001201891,0.000083229774,0.0019476727,0.0005655564,0.00081755786,0.003993905,0.0017407743,0.043962162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014343317,0.00011304316,0.99192387,0.00008157816,0.00024046907,0.00024962894,0.0007855362,0.00064271875,0.0007899252,0.0025357779,0.0025827147,0.00004043996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00394244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029640673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98782647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009730694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123996794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228153971","doi":"","title":"Le Choix de Filière d'Études au Québec : Résumé et Recommandations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3841396892329702,"score_gpt":0.5390525446781685,"score_spread":0.15491285544519834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228153971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16869615,0.1575336,0.016243799,0.24470966,0.012245607,0.003238239,0.028349208,0.0021640575,0.3668197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5873712,0.08751139,0.029654698,0.03067001,0.0031791658,0.0028224266,0.01487283,0.00060035696,0.24331796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736406,0.0041602966,0.0026618384,0.001411977,0.014243065,0.003882148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8685875,0.033465285,0.008059271,0.0062417514,0.07597089,0.007675395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03943419,0.0008482796,0.001112663,0.013894569,0.01016772,0.012253815,0.0038540382,0.004084084,0.009577606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10710787,0.00078348507,0.001556319,0.015041965,0.0042940085,0.00371235,0.0036800487,0.003910757,0.0017591462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000546296,0.00030080098,0.11848456,0.0037979456,0.0003029209,0.0010387799,0.011239357,0.0011546748,0.0019795054,0.04518473,0.34181812,0.47415233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018608336,0.00014652868,0.26412085,0.0051390436,0.00029954,0.00031168686,0.005193545,0.0009200056,0.0029276153,0.0025654915,0.7180506,0.00013912882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95794386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94799757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052002456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1217172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37730604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229757788","doi":"","title":"Un épisode de la guerre de la science au Royaume-Uni","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; University of Toronto; Western Kentucky University; Harvard University; University of Pennsylvania; York University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.22294312304206107,"score_gpt":0.5035896545980231,"score_spread":0.280646531555962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229757788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020284543,0.14454578,0.0037216288,0.5166547,0.029495707,0.000059124908,0.0014623197,0.0004860856,0.28329018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29545948,0.058723845,0.0040868893,0.055761784,0.01640309,0.00021006419,0.0009412395,0.00088527746,0.56752837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933709,0.0023902375,0.0002568242,0.00057566253,0.0022761293,0.0011302399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953122,0.0021731374,0.0003380237,0.00037603505,0.00092424906,0.0008763095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006034649,0.0009753092,0.0013132009,0.0031713017,0.009294394,0.012697607,0.00098397,0.007975856,0.029367037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017509032,0.0008851282,0.00092401967,0.0042870417,0.0073637236,0.011317179,0.008564336,0.013164367,0.007755078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021804482,0.00004740141,0.0006598077,0.0002683522,0.000028991048,0.00069322524,0.009024576,0.0003208123,0.00058825244,0.4217119,0.5155607,0.050877977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062253225,0.0000066379343,0.0005853057,0.0000968551,0.0000018192382,0.000084331856,0.0005922099,0.000043988344,0.0001406626,0.004806886,0.9936249,0.000010180763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066546656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06528949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016855057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009983749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13231862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232401467","doi":"10.1002/asi.23759","title":"The scaling relationship between citation‐based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Exponent; Disadvantage; Bibliometrics; Natural science; Scaling law","score_opus":0.3228976914077188,"score_gpt":0.49624058819332095,"score_spread":0.17334289678560216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232401467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98910785,0.0014939217,0.005253056,0.00024872067,0.000028740402,0.000025111418,0.00027384728,0.000056255092,0.0035124463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986272,0.00023941496,0.0007453079,0.000013965277,0.00004589986,0.000010169426,0.00013917076,0.000008966923,0.00016989064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970788,0.0008906183,0.00039797617,0.00055028393,0.0009215882,0.00016088618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93143976,0.044666965,0.014158023,0.004262701,0.0043013445,0.0011711746],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038220882,0.00027084482,0.00048666506,0.0067523606,0.00049322355,0.0017693597,0.00047965147,0.0004745726,0.0013501516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06720374,0.00021082697,0.0004359255,0.008512515,0.0014002742,0.0026651288,0.0010595956,0.00040993796,0.00046029294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010220371,0.000079417005,0.9412011,0.00026161104,0.0004658747,0.00021348122,0.0015264784,0.004977381,0.0030484458,0.0050135427,0.0005666735,0.042543735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011833285,0.00007918143,0.97488517,0.00003562967,0.00006313785,0.0005190382,0.0006077146,0.009298369,0.001055552,0.011959735,0.00144307,0.000041575775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012312094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009124433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000652241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048119147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020213366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234661914","doi":"10.1257/app.20140135","title":"Understanding the Changing Structure of Scientific Inquiry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Iron Curtain; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Population; Economic geography; Positive economics; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Demography; Cold war; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6496941265357059,"score_gpt":0.48809494942427006,"score_spread":0.16159917711143584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234661914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77924716,0.0055188425,0.044570908,0.06292632,0.00021615901,0.00008866639,0.00068593817,0.0002281207,0.10651783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98964196,0.0011086131,0.0066581494,0.000611709,0.00015138666,0.000051550945,0.0002027372,0.0000365696,0.0015373818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194264,0.0034351812,0.00036054984,0.0017621621,0.0019045366,0.00059498503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512757,0.029487938,0.007763974,0.0042552785,0.00449195,0.0027251462],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008474506,0.00015869734,0.0004739625,0.008370877,0.0027654069,0.010882584,0.0014798759,0.0016189181,0.004783775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063218646,0.0005061291,0.00027579584,0.0073575294,0.01363193,0.021428129,0.0058152024,0.002412577,0.0011554627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016121998,0.00009323296,0.16346492,0.00030613918,0.00006284864,0.00024500772,0.032755937,0.0040972754,0.0034490407,0.6454476,0.0053040357,0.14461268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036355945,0.000055702705,0.104930595,0.00018450028,0.000018202996,0.00016918642,0.017140748,0.0069081,0.00070081226,0.8369468,0.032873604,0.000035405512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004884692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005996338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062093996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040091737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045052588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242723686","doi":"10.1080/17521742.2010.573656","title":"Canadian Researcher Survey 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Editors Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Survey research; Geography; Psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.46786058892066307,"score_gpt":0.5400147138186191,"score_spread":0.07215412489795603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242723686","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004907595,0.0039046295,0.0006070768,0.005291283,0.0012526419,0.0005572221,0.88102406,0.0006300139,0.10182555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029602833,0.011853013,0.0028084733,0.0025030288,0.000625879,0.0014856957,0.41403165,0.0003403661,0.53674906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907238,0.00044814136,0.0006161545,0.000763854,0.006083532,0.0013645978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96608126,0.0021505149,0.0012220535,0.0009880526,0.026620999,0.0029370894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037501955,0.0012893816,0.0013521314,0.033327505,0.0047890157,0.004588897,0.0025718147,0.001394215,0.103870004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021032603,0.0009123933,0.0008877834,0.04932152,0.0007509366,0.0015501273,0.0015905767,0.0017066575,0.05191209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346204,0.000019110668,0.0043278765,0.00027353544,0.000009093107,0.000020821575,0.00013015445,0.00004146927,0.000042520067,0.0016482474,0.97768056,0.015771914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022584389,0.00000968914,0.037385054,0.00016052078,0.000018852752,0.000035289893,0.00026729275,0.00013008942,0.00013048082,0.00016734045,0.96164864,0.000024053388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98007697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043108556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12496196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34747976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243431799","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12455","title":"CITATIONS OR JOURNAL QUALITY: WHICH IS REWARDED MORE IN THE ACADEMIC LABOR MARKET?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Economics; POLK; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law","score_opus":0.8029192847958765,"score_gpt":0.6650213172577557,"score_spread":0.13789796753812078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243431799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89681524,0.008002505,0.0035018981,0.04713555,0.0005333087,0.0000761836,0.00091542635,0.00016451733,0.042855393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384016,0.0007063556,0.0002351819,0.0014216163,0.0004205417,0.00001224769,0.00012428807,0.000042152362,0.0031973773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975349,0.00072758645,0.00014894185,0.00044439282,0.0005986881,0.0005453649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416611,0.02309114,0.021136828,0.0016390713,0.0027097666,0.009762176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005358737,0.00032092762,0.0012911482,0.002310595,0.0012390729,0.0071979063,0.0010398013,0.0027905246,0.022767933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041583385,0.00024684588,0.0007239542,0.0042181127,0.003407875,0.0050021587,0.001883428,0.0017872986,0.0024506815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019574114,0.0012197108,0.7691106,0.00069176947,0.0005225783,0.000358733,0.0016056651,0.002354047,0.0029011301,0.061472915,0.014310748,0.14349465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025708904,0.00075873896,0.86173123,0.00021276326,0.00027049362,0.00029606555,0.003885931,0.00566993,0.0007369051,0.11620259,0.009857463,0.000120846875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040775086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003822237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026061002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017532988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07616633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247316336","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1172","title":"Peer Review in Canada: Results from a Promising Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Negotiation; Skepticism; Peer review; Political science; Criminal justice; Quality assurance; Legal profession; Public relations; Competence (human resources); Economic Justice; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Engineering; Service (business)","score_opus":0.6286206581155899,"score_gpt":0.5296321945891875,"score_spread":0.09898846352640234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247316336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88159364,0.0027719308,0.004190681,0.006229729,0.00045620458,0.012181413,0.00243261,0.00045937748,0.08968445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93568087,0.0022869154,0.013518207,0.00263201,0.00014985225,0.0043603564,0.0016954617,0.00017864176,0.039497774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9433865,0.02516052,0.0016731062,0.0038409815,0.022341663,0.0035973114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8170424,0.09570312,0.0075509627,0.011966791,0.05827336,0.009463315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04409857,0.00086857466,0.0018454574,0.0015220519,0.012421778,0.006252481,0.0028574497,0.002737912,0.008212722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14039744,0.0005808206,0.0008217284,0.004168781,0.0046148854,0.0034916757,0.0029121202,0.0021926528,0.0019749487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05233275,0.06635772,0.13477227,0.0049742935,0.0015095023,0.0016646169,0.053935733,0.008996898,0.008571506,0.039502963,0.09243995,0.53494185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03495656,0.041617382,0.5008185,0.0021611804,0.002311346,0.0005896445,0.051589184,0.043124516,0.011657221,0.030941943,0.27846175,0.0017707883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87438023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90834814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95932966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040670354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113240525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29508543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252830763","doi":"10.7202/1028834ar","title":"Cinquante ans de recherche à l’EBSI : portrait scientométrique de la dynamique de recherche au sein du corps professoral","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.7636546267932617,"score_gpt":0.6402117135931462,"score_spread":0.12344291320011547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252830763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33042803,0.023777315,0.046511132,0.08737565,0.0005715484,0.0003546761,0.0036629997,0.0009130666,0.5064055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88748765,0.011113343,0.019400654,0.0015524623,0.0004222538,0.00027105445,0.0013571321,0.0003108535,0.0780846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98089576,0.006873914,0.0011835606,0.0021933909,0.0071769604,0.0016763951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326886,0.030065548,0.0077491053,0.006131596,0.017880872,0.005484216],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021398004,0.00045978735,0.0009228345,0.018824048,0.0059873187,0.019272404,0.0017416328,0.0016532203,0.011104426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050088987,0.0006974523,0.0008872663,0.03759052,0.0073703662,0.010150098,0.0047193835,0.0023887076,0.0015932475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020147646,0.00008582608,0.06907747,0.0008607777,0.00019782617,0.00028144362,0.05913224,0.003269578,0.002250762,0.6320036,0.016451564,0.21618739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027659376,0.00010331469,0.180046,0.0007885952,0.00010831067,0.00031189946,0.040755566,0.0041295737,0.002084469,0.0853872,0.68610764,0.00014970166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17164947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21507764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98117596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028770046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028944395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34130067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255587629","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00419","title":"Ideational Influence, Connectedness, and Venue Representation: Making an Assessment of Scholarly Capital","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Publication; Promotion (chess); Representation (politics); Work (physics); Capital (architecture); Sociology; Test (biology); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.2710711994470204,"score_gpt":0.5434944868765219,"score_spread":0.2724232874295015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255587629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95790064,0.0003786702,0.01223974,0.0012639302,0.00003587293,0.00010875572,0.00016729246,0.000040523908,0.02786462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960842,0.000119823286,0.0032034954,0.000026603091,0.000015408748,0.00005198455,0.000093586015,0.000004233625,0.00040053128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564326,0.0019460579,0.00033233553,0.00029341935,0.0014399643,0.00034498353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600996,0.021065893,0.008445926,0.0029597506,0.0029799389,0.0044488995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060232957,0.00038408182,0.00045923324,0.007835267,0.0012565114,0.005214466,0.0009728965,0.0010556269,0.0027295167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048077736,0.00017568693,0.0004419382,0.007955464,0.00293105,0.0078000524,0.0054596164,0.00091427297,0.00031086677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003497908,0.00085834286,0.7948272,0.00026162103,0.00027237152,0.0001816262,0.01242876,0.0041107167,0.0010815093,0.044570412,0.0015396094,0.13951795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007994653,0.00062237756,0.80074656,0.00043952858,0.000267015,0.00037798603,0.026455421,0.04027921,0.0029197233,0.11469862,0.01294349,0.00017003548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020588064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038252338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001597761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013650202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03185463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262317165","doi":"","title":"Relationship among Internet Usage, Economic Growth, and Publication Productivity: Comparison between ASEAN and World's Best Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Business; Product (mathematics); Developing country; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.34655900150587543,"score_gpt":0.47608137694854996,"score_spread":0.12952237544267453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262317165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99219996,0.002513201,0.000111587506,0.00034818213,0.000016913891,0.000006946102,0.0013755015,0.000012893807,0.003414832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709487,0.0012029792,0.00012694256,0.000028747618,0.000024583982,0.000008783093,0.0010859242,0.00000387568,0.00042327106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905485,0.00022205111,0.00022963743,0.00010503886,0.00029015107,0.00009833331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878732,0.0037931518,0.005203224,0.00030965995,0.0018439386,0.0009767757],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015628113,0.00020604629,0.00027763838,0.0058350936,0.00035164607,0.0017607001,0.00026533246,0.00023669619,0.0021291957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054000732,0.000097132164,0.00042321754,0.0076037245,0.00032033952,0.0011171439,0.0006281832,0.00032699425,0.00031355425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003937919,0.00003497431,0.9895691,0.00009208143,0.000121464414,0.00022033411,0.00023584606,0.00014248826,0.0000991166,0.000119352386,0.00048012074,0.0088457465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020943955,0.000026846768,0.9974368,0.00004088649,0.000035932724,0.00022974376,0.00071507075,0.0003203156,0.00007594585,0.000060333612,0.0010499184,0.0000061028245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004851423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054061487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046482144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052122824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009646356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264090703","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2337682","title":"Scientific Apophenia in Strategic Management Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic management; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.6158694660558478,"score_gpt":0.5836586941299354,"score_spread":0.032210771925912374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264090703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23155957,0.060502514,0.051005837,0.18651316,0.0045499345,0.00022158638,0.00033980238,0.00020254489,0.46510512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718756,0.0067683756,0.0037966059,0.003471923,0.0017429636,0.0000748162,0.000074911935,0.000025056559,0.012169774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921972,0.0040118103,0.0006019251,0.0006450838,0.0017783686,0.0007655987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493971,0.03335541,0.005946854,0.0025052798,0.005604723,0.0031905435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00982311,0.00031820728,0.00046786334,0.011431301,0.0038718216,0.010499672,0.0009209242,0.0028863323,0.008364294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036355246,0.000268627,0.0003272082,0.008520857,0.015899928,0.010636522,0.005398867,0.0036637958,0.0009901597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056851808,0.00005267107,0.006306043,0.00033812274,0.000017163808,0.0005697334,0.0036056554,0.00030107005,0.00020463421,0.9341155,0.006737546,0.047694992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035106375,0.000052270552,0.0050936565,0.00056029717,0.0000273256,0.0016779901,0.008173793,0.0015377146,0.00044812143,0.932629,0.049744677,0.000020007667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019799843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028450545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053759404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006306139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051950216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264429331","doi":"","title":"Qualitative Study on Dimensions of 'Centre of Excellence' of Foreign Subsidiaries: A Content Analysis of Scientific Literature by Nvivo (Étude Qualitative Sur les Dimensions du Concept de Centre de L’Excellence de la Filiale a L’Étranger: Une Analyse du Contenu de la Littérature Scientifique par Nvivo) (French)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Subsidiary; Multinational corporation; Content analysis; Qualitative research; Sociology; Sample (material); Management; Political science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.11319629354291572,"score_gpt":0.4411822315060243,"score_spread":0.3279859379631086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264429331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597163,0.0016179541,0.017076075,0.004356274,0.00012919615,0.0018436876,0.00071553997,0.000026952672,0.014518049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228055,0.0011430813,0.010142198,0.0006759377,0.000030745716,0.0017778007,0.00016588625,0.000015623995,0.0037681472],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98609865,0.010267012,0.0007195568,0.00065654685,0.0014827442,0.0007755008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94896644,0.040319152,0.0027952183,0.0008117829,0.006102588,0.0010048737],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018345943,0.0002599204,0.0008654465,0.0050130067,0.0037064657,0.0034708588,0.0007189857,0.0012650767,0.0024666486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026794884,0.00035467852,0.0003714419,0.0051380605,0.0047913184,0.003285165,0.0024558029,0.0010657492,0.0002344584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084400155,0.00007695033,0.005255989,0.0009846317,0.000012514767,0.0005598357,0.95913225,0.00014541544,0.0023874345,0.009352253,0.0012821198,0.020726195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021517066,0.000082059974,0.0075218924,0.00065650576,0.000014048221,0.0003145713,0.9670708,0.00027230682,0.0017070227,0.002016499,0.020293336,0.00002943453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044141747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005799746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00932053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076652872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097023726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264463174","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1846-0","title":"Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of South Africa","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Library science; Productivity; Medical education; Population; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.7350202013577418,"score_gpt":0.6208490315127927,"score_spread":0.11417116984494913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264463174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99516195,0.00037368498,0.00008115166,0.0010811902,0.00000787172,0.000025006471,0.0000890765,0.0000050373096,0.0031750593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992919,0.00014746055,0.00010044837,0.000041792682,0.000004679146,0.000010898322,0.000017485216,0.0000013938946,0.00038392437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937828,0.0027351708,0.0006652871,0.0003756908,0.0008084579,0.0016326237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474099,0.021236705,0.015947241,0.0006133553,0.0038085354,0.010984226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004664981,0.00020880922,0.00040489947,0.005709658,0.004290346,0.0054594614,0.00057341106,0.00065318274,0.0062721726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03175328,0.00028771712,0.00023202,0.010002756,0.0013931108,0.0016218579,0.0030903383,0.0008638436,0.00041922068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019484024,0.0001719003,0.9207079,0.00035572847,0.000064339845,0.0014856778,0.050244566,0.0002585441,0.0009951853,0.0030043416,0.0009015204,0.021615505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306232,0.00013298598,0.84167856,0.00039929006,0.000049537888,0.00056186406,0.14848363,0.00041710728,0.00038283985,0.000984446,0.0068539456,0.000025187506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02995496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059358466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99533504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005542067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022086129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059561253},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2267067706","doi":"","title":"Economics Research in Canada: A Long-Run Assessment of Journal Publications","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Economics education; Political science; Applied economics; Library science; Economics; Positive economics; Higher education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5734863969931597,"score_gpt":0.5931875527133056,"score_spread":0.019701155720145858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267067706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253895,0.009314397,0.00043515663,0.0035079098,0.00008226008,0.000059785358,0.04415369,0.0001532835,0.016903909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974277,0.004488605,0.0005128818,0.00017606544,0.00006414814,0.000032008233,0.015014854,0.000031004216,0.005403412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948249,0.00021496556,0.00033535573,0.0004403105,0.0030685118,0.0011159984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95778704,0.0035587237,0.009221793,0.000674981,0.02326883,0.0054886867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022964135,0.00058062025,0.00080773607,0.019382287,0.0031904837,0.0061677117,0.0015236179,0.00080048357,0.0027301863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016430613,0.00022032764,0.00076543743,0.053178083,0.0013604233,0.0017658419,0.0025151991,0.00085561856,0.0006856491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012858029,0.00004442074,0.9682159,0.00020069568,0.00031361126,0.000346864,0.0017450101,0.0016396324,0.00034518022,0.001612959,0.0057493397,0.019657768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072484177,0.000036106856,0.9870884,0.000081183185,0.00009949515,0.00009470445,0.0019784104,0.0016722189,0.00023967688,0.000251792,0.008415468,0.00003534647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97120124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97836363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037779175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053685904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2741084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268343888","doi":"10.17705/1cais.03813","title":"Practical Suggestions for Improving Scholarly Peer Review Quality and Reducing Cycle Times","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Transparency (behavior); Criticism; Harm; Scrutiny; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Technical peer review; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Resentment; Political science; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5942597451162388,"score_gpt":0.5926192196708046,"score_spread":0.0016405254454342488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268343888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008146225,0.014210501,0.113216795,0.8171686,0.017701495,0.0045715887,0.0003455362,0.004563787,0.02007556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10392009,0.019504853,0.73209906,0.087710276,0.018778417,0.012918772,0.00082211243,0.0013384707,0.022908002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8063871,0.11409671,0.021252906,0.007998164,0.042854145,0.007411006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30817184,0.31922376,0.046411898,0.044278704,0.23498312,0.046930656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20065573,0.004164822,0.0026642557,0.01030526,0.0059246374,0.021722281,0.009517306,0.016130745,0.02973773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55508685,0.00222434,0.0030221257,0.010945409,0.007889046,0.029659344,0.0068830317,0.012994052,0.014154436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089577487,0.0018406742,0.0057459967,0.0057361578,0.0003476358,0.00053019676,0.004873784,0.007608724,0.0034429256,0.083659194,0.45708707,0.42823192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030208973,0.0025722147,0.023881892,0.013002778,0.0009803607,0.0012527236,0.01588535,0.014476437,0.0068728193,0.25592676,0.6607346,0.0013930757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007938716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012362096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012121871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06565256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272803201","doi":"","title":"Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Legitimacy; High tech; Narrative; Diversity (politics); Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.18298718709355893,"score_gpt":0.4570893013116872,"score_spread":0.27410211421812825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272803201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03821046,0.0057793777,0.0021387576,0.92441094,0.010249734,0.000031408,0.00012858772,0.0000398848,0.019010847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84665674,0.013231156,0.0027219327,0.08666308,0.016070649,0.00010593123,0.00027801094,0.0002977589,0.033974692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454427,0.0028868604,0.000231761,0.00083894614,0.0009433155,0.0005548084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92537963,0.054111443,0.0037228123,0.0025269026,0.008670649,0.005588627],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016061218,0.00026042495,0.00033140654,0.0021014581,0.0072270585,0.011363953,0.0011366371,0.0045149266,0.0048068366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045244936,0.00039668087,0.00045657804,0.0036428093,0.01003288,0.008188421,0.00429411,0.0075244065,0.0006583124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020123115,0.00004767826,0.009522076,0.00053045363,0.00005454035,0.0028820867,0.12823851,0.0007149847,0.0014028618,0.27459016,0.5458412,0.03597424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002779143,0.00003159177,0.021805331,0.00056519796,0.000029634959,0.0005793328,0.106534466,0.0006810641,0.0010867837,0.065235235,0.8032842,0.00013927848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009176887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015065197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056687496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045158314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08494085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272845791","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.96161.v2","title":"Scaling and Citations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8999824432285404,"score_gpt":0.6596011915158486,"score_spread":0.24038125171269176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272845791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12501281,0.10546413,0.066566624,0.19379215,0.0075258464,0.00021104875,0.005256772,0.0012673311,0.4949033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860722,0.025691528,0.008953843,0.0069174855,0.008017967,0.0003259066,0.0016299434,0.0004535228,0.06193739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585825,0.001562429,0.00028824463,0.00099049,0.0009746895,0.00032591764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97501254,0.015750602,0.0027628827,0.0023202056,0.002957099,0.0011966187],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004597284,0.0006118171,0.001407051,0.0068232664,0.0026503874,0.0069247307,0.001063755,0.0030436157,0.03559581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045921136,0.0004980312,0.0009582626,0.0103541,0.0052351775,0.012435714,0.0037364354,0.002627202,0.0046131946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003361964,0.000027298185,0.002806924,0.00028850496,0.00005612191,0.00011462163,0.0009987996,0.0018153248,0.00017427564,0.8978227,0.045012835,0.050848946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013664323,0.000014998623,0.0032112803,0.0001399312,0.000016480435,0.00014647529,0.00028321522,0.0018680623,0.000106041654,0.9315351,0.062637724,0.000026950729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024433963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015385118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99317676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003609544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010479335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11907983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277327339","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2017.1284997","title":"Researcher rank stability across alternative output measurement schemes in the context of a time limited research evaluation: the New Zealand case","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Stability (learning theory); Productivity; Econometrics; Term (time); Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Geography; Machine learning; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8450552716959101,"score_gpt":0.6038854642037887,"score_spread":0.24116980749212136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277327339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93346477,0.00084413606,0.034517277,0.005884074,0.00006100811,0.00036748362,0.00045353058,0.000055920158,0.024351854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265796,0.00006934238,0.0062016654,0.00006220976,0.000021446283,0.00007584697,0.00008315762,0.000008789139,0.0008195877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8917436,0.06586661,0.007688457,0.009264625,0.02094972,0.004487054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6735705,0.1998835,0.065382704,0.022360468,0.032571957,0.006230913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09923055,0.00051435176,0.0015068803,0.0055547194,0.004975589,0.009001328,0.0018351785,0.0020574764,0.0024601687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3045952,0.00039470862,0.00076333154,0.008247951,0.00837921,0.006556207,0.0057462566,0.0025445858,0.0003673636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034658993,0.00078399235,0.45186442,0.0007299943,0.00086077047,0.0047062025,0.047735173,0.04929294,0.0035930995,0.250812,0.0035205062,0.18263498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048127506,0.0024503933,0.41945812,0.0008720718,0.000521455,0.0022498944,0.05617599,0.19340158,0.004888965,0.29476374,0.024006834,0.0007296822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044923697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03842402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99444526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011926137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006890607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52478755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280374399","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1807-z","title":"Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Index (typography); Computer science; Metric (unit); Citation; Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Data science; Citation index; Operations research; Library science; Mathematics; Marketing; Economics; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9550993674466709,"score_gpt":0.6719727838580462,"score_spread":0.28312658358862475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280374399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62212455,0.010022886,0.22045095,0.002209489,0.0006105553,0.00056944625,0.019770943,0.0017510172,0.12249012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311358,0.0039882194,0.05258229,0.000109099296,0.0004147675,0.00036802972,0.00651728,0.00011449756,0.004769952],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907745,0.0018813123,0.0010865381,0.0007821783,0.0068544713,0.00031815402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668832,0.017894926,0.0057257633,0.0022052354,0.0063620107,0.0009289316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008538757,0.00090045313,0.0014375568,0.03576131,0.0006860103,0.006213211,0.0014943179,0.0008706229,0.0041383556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053193524,0.00016684309,0.0010210415,0.04595055,0.001373849,0.005048364,0.0029101009,0.0007016273,0.002089454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004928955,0.00043162092,0.3539979,0.0056256335,0.0018094783,0.00029829014,0.0020968816,0.01776173,0.03107121,0.08156397,0.009065621,0.49578485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012853101,0.0012822322,0.57982284,0.00079040235,0.0016598414,0.0012007087,0.004693408,0.08814511,0.076632395,0.17780527,0.06747414,0.0003651221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095250655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012200995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019977156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04515779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281991771","doi":"","title":"Big publishers, bigger profits : how the scholarly community lost the control of its journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Business; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.251894463625915,"score_gpt":0.3460360942199667,"score_spread":0.09414163059405167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281991771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46858642,0.01792783,0.0067995866,0.30383223,0.002286628,0.00008984951,0.00025594706,0.0004607364,0.19976072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96825343,0.0034972592,0.0006518383,0.0076232734,0.00069551467,0.000017934573,0.000042571806,0.00016457305,0.019053468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167365,0.0030694387,0.00022643199,0.0008647905,0.0026725298,0.0014931734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96747833,0.015693063,0.0024549435,0.002847939,0.004546608,0.0069790985],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012666053,0.00041620395,0.00064813904,0.0036768944,0.013984441,0.039654616,0.0021132042,0.0031537274,0.008837714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041284464,0.0004595752,0.0005221927,0.005294243,0.02988491,0.025532864,0.010486355,0.004976075,0.0017890306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035793576,0.00020931388,0.019991074,0.00023476854,0.00010092007,0.0013639019,0.096931666,0.00085660175,0.0013337142,0.5862706,0.08104671,0.21130288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015010098,0.0002314823,0.020523652,0.00046675434,0.00008852953,0.00066190027,0.11306813,0.001303482,0.0014334666,0.38682348,0.4750246,0.0002243323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04603833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053177994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017016308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015536908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1234625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283711217","doi":"","title":"Manuscript processing times are negatively correlated with journal impact factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26387220803808714,"score_gpt":0.4572115790032622,"score_spread":0.19333937096517506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283711217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811859,0.0054878234,0.005934049,0.00080490037,0.00030516673,0.00017001359,0.0012346813,0.0002812996,0.0045960243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881954,0.0021985406,0.005439183,0.00014398874,0.00038983815,0.000361208,0.0011113937,0.000092236325,0.0020681762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849192,0.003082309,0.0038246552,0.0011065466,0.006368643,0.0006986669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63517797,0.21582255,0.09849315,0.008653289,0.033397228,0.008455822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013664057,0.00051147846,0.000851628,0.0047257557,0.0006820877,0.0029000442,0.0006075919,0.00066383305,0.004726801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14132683,0.0003307945,0.0012065333,0.0056469482,0.0005739374,0.0016252634,0.0010905791,0.000879189,0.0014498299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033396084,0.0004599141,0.8790877,0.0013793772,0.0010366518,0.00036015201,0.001255403,0.0013971057,0.016455233,0.00044546122,0.002359331,0.09242409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006077629,0.00092572474,0.9878006,0.000072657596,0.00016451419,0.00049456995,0.0003954534,0.0011415738,0.0048969346,0.00045649646,0.0035410828,0.000049583676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008094404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007357628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99527425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000699082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018329385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0722633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284129047","doi":"10.7202/1029323ar","title":"La gestion des connaissances dans les organisations québécoises : état des lieux, enjeux actuels, avenir","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.48192912784833386,"score_gpt":0.5252783895354713,"score_spread":0.043349261687137486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284129047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5993626,0.014051115,0.0041792993,0.07164047,0.0003057756,0.000082893726,0.0015471788,0.00011043567,0.3087202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96898377,0.0029460625,0.00075595686,0.00077435747,0.000050348794,0.000025584728,0.00016432113,0.000020347214,0.026279239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997216,0.0006898641,0.00006761355,0.00028019398,0.0010606234,0.0006856248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898977,0.0033773456,0.0012849239,0.00046789562,0.0034402255,0.001531841],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036365844,0.00026707738,0.0003751833,0.0047741774,0.009643507,0.008968218,0.0008194416,0.001186663,0.012958488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008705794,0.000227644,0.00029135976,0.009254927,0.006829383,0.0037618417,0.0028748342,0.0017055172,0.00046127793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009212095,0.000055090666,0.2137793,0.00049774593,0.00012434585,0.0008128564,0.23948285,0.0012540683,0.0014312366,0.3194412,0.028692432,0.19433676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010837506,0.000040274936,0.42898998,0.0009274811,0.000054893342,0.00014152219,0.13962607,0.0009166454,0.00051755365,0.016895548,0.41176945,0.00010979512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95373946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97571397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99522585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056446563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047852892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40955043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285529589","doi":"10.18352/lq.10139","title":"A Library-publisher Partnership for Open Access: Building an Innovative Relationship between Scholarly Publishers and Academic Libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Publishing; Open access publishing; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Business; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.6954928810346864,"score_gpt":0.5685022125474674,"score_spread":0.12699066848721907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285529589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10450543,0.011425599,0.11959568,0.35298505,0.0027056646,0.0011924012,0.00012697832,0.0008357473,0.40662748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.856487,0.004438442,0.052994866,0.015979135,0.00084705395,0.00048827892,0.00010987957,0.00020272317,0.06845262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92955035,0.040292557,0.0018311979,0.0026201059,0.017640967,0.008064858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91529197,0.023410687,0.004128889,0.0039398023,0.0130504165,0.04017825],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05196834,0.00057724357,0.0005819987,0.0059915707,0.030791696,0.056647327,0.0037992531,0.008142415,0.008606552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04479447,0.0008949575,0.00072401704,0.0073451,0.017208898,0.0355044,0.048193563,0.008372258,0.0025555475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011150825,0.000516768,0.01134845,0.0005204948,0.00008379306,0.0028419583,0.10655395,0.0008847183,0.0012286671,0.63084424,0.05475034,0.19031508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006314583,0.00018571616,0.0027007682,0.00060493354,0.000046260644,0.0011257966,0.1184286,0.0014115484,0.0007343689,0.13275126,0.7417671,0.00018048994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02929988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057472184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99620074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020490034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12507582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2748381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287531290","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1848-y","title":"The effect of holding a research chair on scientists’ productivity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Novelty; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7473508328001948,"score_gpt":0.6643655597955263,"score_spread":0.08298527300466851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287531290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98696136,0.0014468792,0.00033745106,0.004722118,0.0002774656,0.00002088282,0.00072707946,0.00005284591,0.005453853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972687,0.00022199216,0.00006537883,0.00016606161,0.00020883548,0.000009889638,0.0001978152,0.0000061286455,0.0018552005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98813206,0.0055059986,0.0008395581,0.0009894699,0.0010698767,0.0034630569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7198836,0.18566152,0.04229266,0.0051107397,0.006409073,0.040642373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013584246,0.00039477128,0.0011133628,0.0019617632,0.0015213753,0.0046792366,0.0016076908,0.0029965704,0.019407513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08350554,0.00040081432,0.0021481274,0.0036373744,0.0019209984,0.0022507238,0.0024453984,0.003557786,0.0022432841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008129628,0.0017161533,0.9566192,0.00021154612,0.0020811323,0.00064320565,0.00047151552,0.0036929275,0.0023522684,0.0015313694,0.0035960372,0.018954974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003700849,0.001878355,0.9885073,0.00003132128,0.0012876423,0.00018243364,0.0017770167,0.0014544843,0.0012216343,0.0014644731,0.0017616776,0.00006356029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024701364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021572461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99803823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002608028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052352548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07184118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287897107","doi":"","title":"Les journalistes scientifiques: des éducateurs? Enquête auprès des membres de l'Association des communicateurs scientifiques du Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les cahiers du journalisme","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2824002846757179,"score_gpt":0.4535857763753688,"score_spread":0.17118549169965086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287897107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38680136,0.026989948,0.0013692089,0.4924729,0.005519227,0.00012478414,0.0004182427,0.00012151527,0.086182706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77908754,0.014360187,0.0010826769,0.029608022,0.0018519327,0.00012040578,0.000264809,0.0001406775,0.1734837],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417467,0.0049122735,0.00046477298,0.000712884,0.0051042237,0.004631158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92151225,0.01620014,0.0052760034,0.00093961373,0.027330484,0.02874149],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017471036,0.00052235276,0.00069655554,0.003133106,0.025080163,0.015059996,0.001446332,0.005610212,0.01602753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046284594,0.0007086874,0.00036630046,0.004183654,0.00489889,0.0054463395,0.004698256,0.007720163,0.0021841542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034426624,0.00042135778,0.09401903,0.00074730517,0.00007530468,0.0031463625,0.44697088,0.00023115169,0.0025677977,0.027393982,0.20813209,0.21595049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003099219,0.00011880974,0.07277995,0.0005623772,0.00003692374,0.0005141652,0.23499154,0.00020246679,0.00072140485,0.0011216388,0.6888324,0.00008733953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6043765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7797239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036881905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10613339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7959068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292160947","doi":"","title":"BioMed Central : un nouveau modèle de l'édition scientifique à l'Université de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0780410226523355,"score_gpt":0.29331870721050807,"score_spread":0.21527768455817256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292160947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061118114,0.017803214,0.28437716,0.20185238,0.008291169,0.002043996,0.020257758,0.014728847,0.44453377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23877935,0.028560426,0.3309988,0.01828834,0.003921116,0.0035970875,0.011403711,0.00560929,0.35884196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97743714,0.008531095,0.0011419002,0.0028637147,0.008560276,0.0014658751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475375,0.014480373,0.0026866752,0.010851605,0.017728945,0.0067150737],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027928717,0.0013401979,0.0016555452,0.009741236,0.006245519,0.03922313,0.0074201603,0.00710373,0.055108838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079860605,0.0021422042,0.0020285915,0.015673865,0.008169765,0.019683322,0.008184158,0.005365405,0.018857278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018297067,0.00006237411,0.0022059376,0.0010260794,0.00014993266,0.0001850717,0.0021196962,0.0036268486,0.0005390315,0.6528179,0.2328266,0.10425768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012633392,0.00005569473,0.0013914948,0.000676772,0.00011526181,0.00009947605,0.00057386607,0.0067488,0.0006910708,0.11060384,0.87877786,0.00013945563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33277833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2756828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040886752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10802139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6616827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292736936","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2015.7417042","title":"Crawling ResearchGate.net to Measure Student/Supervisor Collaboration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; Crawling; Supervisor; Download; Computer science; Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); World Wide Web; Measure (data warehouse); Knowledge management; Data science; Social media; Database; Management","score_opus":0.8281249177914913,"score_gpt":0.646497618326707,"score_spread":0.1816272994647843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292736936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70321864,0.0051611625,0.024077887,0.0022972475,0.00038680487,0.001146371,0.1914625,0.0060116746,0.06623773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.704151,0.0026752104,0.072646044,0.00023286616,0.00023657929,0.0021094005,0.20400181,0.0006763056,0.013270905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946931,0.0011010814,0.0005447362,0.0007962003,0.0026087638,0.00025604424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631688,0.0185819,0.0057777963,0.0035584874,0.0065376987,0.002375294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044484725,0.0006121942,0.0006221235,0.025503624,0.0013661693,0.002533225,0.0009503251,0.0009542338,0.0020530547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03508879,0.0003406298,0.00037856319,0.030149795,0.00051688455,0.0026671141,0.0017447486,0.0007336015,0.0013576677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063349825,0.0009086251,0.3749649,0.006065524,0.00074853917,0.0009017073,0.010685234,0.012217035,0.015061821,0.031681444,0.21562381,0.33050796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261628,0.000401897,0.45741323,0.0005700647,0.00037038577,0.0013979992,0.0061012767,0.050893385,0.017534737,0.016462512,0.44833893,0.00028951725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021021036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03411319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016158712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036510795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04179734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292880094","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22459","title":"How do you write and present research well? 7—Cite to get cited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Balance (ability); Library science; Computer science; History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3411668512366858,"score_gpt":0.46269953616880805,"score_spread":0.12153268493212227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292880094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017751878,0.011197426,0.019558825,0.69226897,0.17866664,0.0016950368,0.0022278652,0.0057903263,0.086819746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036073074,0.0358943,0.13077673,0.37212622,0.22584029,0.006897343,0.0039605163,0.01119765,0.1772338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9024563,0.029042028,0.019039363,0.0035882406,0.042798582,0.0030754637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49496263,0.09369599,0.028383952,0.02498848,0.31292817,0.04504072],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077116445,0.001298473,0.0024828599,0.009306683,0.0053963866,0.031131472,0.0030086394,0.011848196,0.09885788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3964444,0.0010526964,0.0020269454,0.006833149,0.0057438,0.018515734,0.007778534,0.008094837,0.21026854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046165154,0.000069049434,0.00075176917,0.0012409393,0.000042052616,0.00010749958,0.0010014393,0.000037779144,0.0004221252,0.0028323082,0.85620207,0.13724679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044791854,0.00007321451,0.0011636947,0.0031092095,0.000038999427,0.00025832554,0.0021201258,0.00016027979,0.0003871943,0.010288636,0.98226327,0.00009224076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019002723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037220959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99069333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003510721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017480502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4078356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293584438","doi":"","title":"Founding concepts and foundational work: Establishing the framework for the use of acknowledgments as indicators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Multidisciplinary approach; Credibility; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Publication; Value (mathematics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8371206012614246,"score_gpt":0.631173726372103,"score_spread":0.20594687488932162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293584438","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091007255,0.017947141,0.6730813,0.07562769,0.0014638746,0.002374977,0.00087398523,0.00060311623,0.13702065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839466,0.0034977538,0.30496934,0.0016003137,0.00031570837,0.0035409457,0.00043598237,0.00019994813,0.0014933451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85762143,0.11050071,0.008948751,0.008829779,0.011480077,0.002619334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6608806,0.26666906,0.022705998,0.01991696,0.024478886,0.005348481],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1675246,0.0013974765,0.0016482922,0.04067468,0.010865757,0.023977965,0.005527372,0.004621838,0.0026999705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2442438,0.0011909623,0.0015776143,0.027764548,0.08946676,0.049810335,0.01636851,0.005505994,0.00050484383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002002371,0.0000322964,0.004041712,0.0005200057,0.000029192872,0.00010276978,0.08002224,0.0003024775,0.00013551583,0.8803556,0.0013302984,0.033107903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195903,0.000039311675,0.0025792283,0.002323711,0.000040707164,0.0001481892,0.054430407,0.0014566325,0.0003115665,0.89159393,0.047000803,0.00005352566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032750554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017311295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020803427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8859654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294048888","doi":"10.1126/science.351.6276.927-a","title":"Walking the open science walk","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6756997810208007,"score_gpt":0.6247640097880295,"score_spread":0.050935771232771265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294048888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023175766,0.0019355455,0.0001579005,0.97078407,0.016514685,0.000011765561,0.00004564789,0.000031937856,0.010286724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034473226,0.00056603225,0.00013612103,0.9669603,0.0052304463,0.000025810241,0.000020570775,0.000025111418,0.023588305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823357,0.0032424117,0.0006398698,0.0015865022,0.00438171,0.0019158454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98521405,0.005695171,0.0006918847,0.0007432683,0.0022928107,0.0053628786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011655097,0.0008433529,0.0009648183,0.0009916825,0.014360317,0.0099230865,0.0017502335,0.050500415,0.018242117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04380303,0.0007964384,0.00094869366,0.00056576106,0.009368043,0.010701751,0.008009747,0.056951296,0.015994469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028134227,0.000014630142,0.000117520234,0.000015968559,0.0000044379294,0.00016727495,0.00021266288,0.000013655687,0.00006068642,0.013120937,0.97855127,0.007692926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022195492,0.000021517515,0.00020971418,0.000094879084,0.0000031485697,0.00011870363,0.0004169905,0.00004410482,0.00006005107,0.010109357,0.9888793,0.000020076162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027306832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06267057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99824977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01043323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016059227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07569873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294655130","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00417","title":"Rejoinder to the Response to \"The Scholarly Capital Model\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Mittuniversitetet","keywords":"Fallacy; Fetishism; Capital (architecture); Positive economics; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Public relations; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.31070643013841426,"score_gpt":0.48235518115401477,"score_spread":0.1716487510156005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294655130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001395331,0.0012120666,0.0053771213,0.98283654,0.0050945617,0.00001511316,0.0000761765,0.00009309763,0.0038999147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081827685,0.002029903,0.014054399,0.8700276,0.019277757,0.00024189866,0.000077673736,0.00023879515,0.012224364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570435,0.014462249,0.0024840452,0.0076725367,0.017051157,0.0012864439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450198,0.09578991,0.006577377,0.011514785,0.036673505,0.0044246274],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038643707,0.0015109206,0.0020583724,0.0026354752,0.0071300007,0.01251855,0.007048648,0.028049342,0.0051155225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1325825,0.0007473244,0.0014457763,0.002976211,0.035443164,0.016140442,0.009151739,0.065479055,0.003604103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071163864,0.000060788923,0.0010567557,0.0001347409,0.000046738995,0.00013120745,0.002775333,0.0003054571,0.00021422286,0.4984431,0.48048767,0.01627287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074002106,0.000059261616,0.0012450943,0.0005718137,0.000037692622,0.00031192618,0.002663146,0.0021004477,0.00070733577,0.5276577,0.46440163,0.00016999598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01038681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009807256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010102253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009024845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2043699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296160973","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0149504","title":"Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publish or perish; Productivity; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Period (music); Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Social science; Positive economics; Library science; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8641365597278564,"score_gpt":0.5361945352035276,"score_spread":0.32794202452432886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296160973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37313914,0.29873788,0.017781088,0.15937585,0.025460608,0.00013150796,0.029677706,0.0021272558,0.093568936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80570334,0.10909965,0.014047821,0.018949255,0.012601348,0.00018889992,0.013782874,0.0009801176,0.024646707],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660854,0.0077318656,0.0046467506,0.008330733,0.011872183,0.0013331295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8137021,0.061623488,0.052582465,0.026110316,0.039600942,0.006380677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03402276,0.00042243802,0.0016664523,0.011174248,0.0012439673,0.010543716,0.0013098065,0.002213203,0.00717498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1273892,0.0005842806,0.0016016588,0.03745091,0.0035094,0.007919308,0.0026478688,0.0023899772,0.0053383494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008140128,0.00008163423,0.28690398,0.008253974,0.0034412013,0.0003527996,0.007039465,0.0011909964,0.0031890622,0.051918663,0.08480152,0.5520126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008504624,0.00026752014,0.29545587,0.0025821796,0.0008738951,0.0011711307,0.0023312883,0.0008069158,0.0026294813,0.017697169,0.67591727,0.00018215491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028551708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026298687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98882574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003193931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005381749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1799317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298525665","doi":"10.1629/uksg.278","title":"Making OA monographs happen: Library-Press collaboration at the University of Ottawa, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Context (archaeology); Library science; Scholarly communication; General partnership; Revenue; Political science; Order (exchange); Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Business; History; Law","score_opus":0.2981273963048047,"score_gpt":0.4271542118040114,"score_spread":0.1290268154992067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298525665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2894443,0.03222166,0.00092376786,0.19379213,0.0026368466,0.0004990302,0.0032173984,0.00070137886,0.4765635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6653683,0.013025486,0.0018067282,0.010596658,0.00031868942,0.00015959694,0.0011907129,0.0003713289,0.3071625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.976303,0.004263492,0.0010071158,0.001949119,0.010625005,0.005852375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8877633,0.018961625,0.0044281464,0.003207312,0.034721404,0.050918184],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01232209,0.0003805894,0.0007037628,0.0068527125,0.038866125,0.037491973,0.0033038352,0.0035904467,0.04120414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04018027,0.0010212595,0.000391342,0.018236533,0.009945293,0.008141403,0.00874183,0.0033505429,0.0054094084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048549095,0.00040783937,0.046743143,0.0010413148,0.00011358621,0.0034078725,0.13582097,0.00047754907,0.0017809452,0.03357536,0.57865757,0.19748838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030033569,0.000043730102,0.051774513,0.00036556012,0.000030285786,0.00019302816,0.110892855,0.00017583797,0.00046006657,0.0008103973,0.83507556,0.00014820858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97584707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19207294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38065726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93708086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299920073","doi":"10.1345/aph.19127a","title":"Comment: Publication Rates of Abstracts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Family medicine","score_opus":0.7618624421105624,"score_gpt":0.6490714974649519,"score_spread":0.11279094464561057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299920073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004945652,0.00048725485,0.00007605684,0.9760558,0.020539505,0.000013032941,0.0002949426,0.000045489865,0.0019933633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036624558,0.00030394155,0.00017128667,0.96819735,0.02410776,0.00003363058,0.000113675225,0.000030165407,0.0033797445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747829,0.0042597614,0.005024082,0.003274137,0.010505809,0.0021534124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79973114,0.1270995,0.017852101,0.0056482814,0.04270394,0.006964975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019586766,0.0010669109,0.0023410856,0.0035792137,0.0035335282,0.0061191837,0.004979571,0.0635925,0.011931471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21319011,0.0012262769,0.0026440471,0.0048917797,0.003278575,0.0052651935,0.002490046,0.035165466,0.014083576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015510972,0.000023148217,0.0017433844,0.00012687752,0.000050445484,0.00032381577,0.00013798535,0.00005669673,0.00015291205,0.0014150707,0.990756,0.005058645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060053746,0.00016965307,0.014675923,0.0011684023,0.000358082,0.001471432,0.0010087589,0.0009853846,0.0015556479,0.012443629,0.9653267,0.00023575324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017190851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014888385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007746863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057262983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10358596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305422018","doi":"10.1002/leap.1015","title":"Small scholar‐led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Scholarly communication; Commons; Public relations; Failure to thrive; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; MEDLINE; Medicine; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.7398215833399304,"score_gpt":0.592642701850462,"score_spread":0.14717888148946845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305422018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357769,0.001162637,0.0018105134,0.018025856,0.00021971184,0.00016155331,0.000058910675,0.000049762184,0.042734202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558866,0.00036008086,0.0008795767,0.0005075795,0.000058499947,0.000042702766,0.000028376,0.000010906109,0.002523696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98594517,0.007544817,0.00048551627,0.0006069908,0.0033604004,0.0020570986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8856454,0.04888808,0.014563062,0.004597674,0.017804096,0.028501716],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021844903,0.0002742211,0.0005488665,0.003092213,0.005818349,0.019396802,0.0019236614,0.001793675,0.0071330597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07063624,0.00026431898,0.00035861385,0.0029640251,0.0071777347,0.011687269,0.006610825,0.001898459,0.0011985691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012545369,0.0022843513,0.30396375,0.0011310705,0.0002361828,0.0052016247,0.2727196,0.00092818384,0.009454447,0.1272966,0.020901034,0.25462866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021362287,0.001020294,0.12653781,0.0006721869,0.00009521462,0.0010320129,0.65897423,0.0014377836,0.004363833,0.06530009,0.14017324,0.00017969098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019096978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047937017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004379508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008580288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115528286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310619103","doi":"10.13021/g8x88s","title":"What Is Open?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Open access publishing; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Point (geometry); Open data; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7956964088141127,"score_gpt":0.6277129605866717,"score_spread":0.16798344822744105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310619103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010508508,0.020112004,0.011477469,0.4879146,0.010726475,0.00008619125,0.00047093505,0.00012566085,0.45857826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6842728,0.04369723,0.012655437,0.14536986,0.016157486,0.0004626086,0.0011571642,0.00057283835,0.095654495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9556166,0.019628042,0.0023347642,0.0043488657,0.014682363,0.0033893974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476194,0.025350502,0.004119484,0.0071320934,0.009101874,0.006676751],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025983334,0.0004673681,0.0014700581,0.0035209935,0.008594363,0.03176027,0.001906709,0.0070635746,0.022983596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08441531,0.00037157102,0.000884009,0.004808107,0.031446733,0.040237952,0.007958372,0.008137515,0.0070068603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029709881,0.000036928734,0.0018452494,0.00034339988,0.000032357166,0.00018333699,0.0071954685,0.0000888199,0.00012551082,0.85930383,0.06455414,0.06626127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061855917,0.000013898258,0.00081104087,0.0010991544,0.000017894148,0.00019485783,0.012090589,0.000073415205,0.00013644468,0.504626,0.48090068,0.000029823055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003575991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037188083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054059257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0143787805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13741463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310855618","doi":"10.13021/g8w89v","title":"Participation in the Current System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Dartmouth College; University of Washington","keywords":"Incentive; Publishing; Current (fluid); Public relations; Perception; Business; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.7892528846793322,"score_gpt":0.635582024760357,"score_spread":0.15367085991897522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310855618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42083922,0.00070349226,0.012537751,0.05253267,0.0011342373,0.00038084076,0.0005037135,0.00023603544,0.5111321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522131,0.00027213912,0.0031080672,0.003779898,0.0005301774,0.00023346544,0.0003056744,0.00006679049,0.039490562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594352,0.019318352,0.0019524215,0.0047409837,0.009393035,0.0051599536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92211384,0.017869852,0.009194473,0.013615719,0.013274695,0.023931384],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024877736,0.00025393043,0.00054591184,0.0018412541,0.007683284,0.014877663,0.0020716528,0.002810061,0.045381673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057206936,0.00029989955,0.0005147642,0.002457744,0.004571227,0.009971624,0.007782012,0.0032272667,0.005603653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006294506,0.0016783141,0.17336175,0.0005519659,0.0001786872,0.00053309725,0.06936115,0.0004848951,0.0052333726,0.46867472,0.061601747,0.2177108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021142878,0.00072411285,0.089607164,0.0004165041,0.00015396286,0.00062048866,0.043121446,0.001786509,0.0016581465,0.1231028,0.7384445,0.00015284515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028463195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037824863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99815875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004614537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010930191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15181679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313614122","doi":"10.1098/rsos.140540","title":"The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Killam Trusts; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet","keywords":"Metric (unit); Missing data; Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.6623606050838677,"score_gpt":0.6210994328536711,"score_spread":0.04126117223019665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313614122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21567322,0.018921174,0.67772293,0.01201592,0.005008302,0.0017744912,0.0120317675,0.0062028337,0.050649375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7635256,0.0024178755,0.21741839,0.00073634146,0.0025007594,0.0012447307,0.0045896647,0.0007424189,0.006824189],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8435932,0.08224733,0.014080126,0.013954494,0.043613423,0.0025114294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55055344,0.25139943,0.06287418,0.04369187,0.0788607,0.012620338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07901797,0.0020286709,0.0033299318,0.013501979,0.0025886786,0.0072056083,0.0040057707,0.0031466312,0.0039877603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4041306,0.00080361444,0.0014592189,0.016353553,0.0030158842,0.010057979,0.0059369057,0.0018454636,0.0038046874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020577353,0.0003661838,0.18545207,0.004613559,0.002246419,0.0006388747,0.0058143665,0.044651058,0.007579257,0.087086536,0.06607852,0.5934154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069459167,0.004102403,0.16746303,0.0018025464,0.0021333105,0.0048082117,0.0038814547,0.25149077,0.025632668,0.2970622,0.23950502,0.0014238503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017126944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015184373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025974854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050545637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41789192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315069118","doi":"10.5363/tits.14.8_80","title":"A Report of Visit to Canadian Institutes and Schools by the Japan-Canada WISET Exchange Lectureship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.39528117876506064,"score_gpt":0.5224697027009024,"score_spread":0.1271885239358418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315069118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13638258,0.021740565,0.0030043873,0.3354513,0.15403661,0.0022120292,0.064743854,0.0016623843,0.28076637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077300794,0.0046526603,0.0014150703,0.014203744,0.003492678,0.00021271841,0.009218801,0.00032049973,0.88918304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950163,0.00020757128,0.00007490331,0.00020989914,0.0028180266,0.0016733492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876035,0.00031948416,0.00023721,0.0002803517,0.005585989,0.0048167077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003177758,0.0009488577,0.00083937676,0.0039585684,0.013180563,0.005250651,0.0016946202,0.0048549403,0.04047132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006140024,0.0005425572,0.0012548107,0.0048827613,0.0013229317,0.0014466199,0.0040280162,0.0054838965,0.007065949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018871255,0.00011316855,0.003886433,0.00012900069,0.000023313683,0.0005717101,0.00090948783,0.00012600698,0.0012720551,0.0013032198,0.9751703,0.016306624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019391759,0.000049626236,0.03888416,0.00003676243,0.000021607028,0.00008369522,0.0030373603,0.00015453596,0.00063075894,0.00014866354,0.9568793,0.000054209522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8969485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9480844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10305148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020874394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06594144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2073167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317982605","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22479","title":"How do you write and present research well? 8 — Assign authorship according to intellectual involvement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5099878493238604,"score_gpt":0.4760024440835903,"score_spread":0.033985405240270106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317982605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041846618,0.005260491,0.14879395,0.58200353,0.02414605,0.005415482,0.0025478315,0.0032796941,0.18670633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37164998,0.0065911626,0.49007162,0.05971606,0.017251637,0.009837351,0.002587326,0.0024515896,0.039843313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8043469,0.105983295,0.035916656,0.0061398232,0.043778542,0.0038347722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4608068,0.20515801,0.049532276,0.04934612,0.21201883,0.023137987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15679114,0.0010142964,0.0017170134,0.006974877,0.0042643617,0.017933924,0.0023494945,0.006870289,0.027657656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45269448,0.0008581443,0.0015936998,0.0040647467,0.008341957,0.015820893,0.008654429,0.004268936,0.032156393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003125636,0.00045506418,0.019381898,0.0027323426,0.00021749831,0.00028432562,0.010384922,0.00031373743,0.0024519742,0.03863686,0.2631485,0.6616803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446645,0.0006383164,0.02985161,0.009660278,0.00030506623,0.0024956418,0.028850056,0.0050847284,0.006582914,0.28640252,0.6290604,0.0006219275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005300238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010556389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99312973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003477178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012488312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8292007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319513970","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2014-0077","title":"Is open-access publishing the wave of the future in science?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.3568832055553049,"score_gpt":0.5642497058865253,"score_spread":0.20736650033122045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319513970","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041174786,0.006278633,0.00009986003,0.11360818,0.8789202,0.000006703451,0.000029068413,0.000029850124,0.0009862428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082462415,0.0067982366,0.00013603398,0.028623918,0.96039766,0.000013093537,0.000016770207,0.000027248343,0.0031623107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97175986,0.0044275126,0.0029380275,0.0017365793,0.017594004,0.0015440368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8447847,0.080746345,0.0074200653,0.003435871,0.0491909,0.014422159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029306628,0.002479467,0.004991109,0.0073935976,0.0054011797,0.023592548,0.0064569493,0.028343238,0.011801676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12977035,0.0014465655,0.0028094423,0.005960933,0.008958116,0.010350168,0.0028583724,0.03043278,0.004909241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042588323,0.000019843372,0.000067448585,0.00042428903,0.000048868285,0.00009232705,0.000048079553,0.00003083416,0.000030277102,0.002315327,0.9876658,0.009214374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008400976,0.00003164784,0.00048668488,0.0010336748,0.00011732869,0.00014991792,0.00021874423,0.00023180491,0.00009908176,0.0069475356,0.99055135,0.000048283804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006300963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154711045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007959845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013763296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15499014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319676922","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2016.01.005","title":"Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Canadian Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Statement (logic); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Guideline; Reflection (computer programming); Key (lock); Epistemology; Data science; History; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pathology","score_opus":0.35438733160538916,"score_gpt":0.612797274382186,"score_spread":0.25840994277679685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319676922","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000929201,0.035134587,0.019646212,0.40978473,0.5131093,0.0065714475,0.0013742474,0.0024327904,0.011017388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007926415,0.02883651,0.10408019,0.21906489,0.6002696,0.010546554,0.0017537411,0.0014213364,0.026100699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.79422385,0.072777435,0.079849005,0.00528073,0.044633288,0.0032356707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32717502,0.22096242,0.0552724,0.020027367,0.35431376,0.022249106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13570781,0.0042767785,0.0075167893,0.019488413,0.0068007,0.019343494,0.0066801575,0.024302443,0.008120391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45908657,0.0032845954,0.0054010185,0.006920833,0.00607635,0.0086777285,0.0055427738,0.02240551,0.01813199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066139306,0.000041424497,0.00032183668,0.0014645656,0.00007467212,0.00034085702,0.00033012743,0.00005438634,0.0003416817,0.00022060548,0.9638203,0.03292346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036909818,0.00011541107,0.001917751,0.007305605,0.00035645405,0.0017111494,0.0009261909,0.00068210415,0.00053458737,0.0050661713,0.9807974,0.0002179934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025613569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012632137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047884295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02728579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71770006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322690092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.231","title":"A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors for Behind-the-Scenes Data on the Publication Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Public relations; Process (computing); Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6898950649847486,"score_gpt":0.5711992726196081,"score_spread":0.1186957923651405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322690092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521744,0.0006978499,0.00039487146,0.0007093005,0.000024389314,0.00007844142,0.00038531618,0.000022723456,0.0024697196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686724,0.0005261531,0.00077415834,0.00035430017,0.000061424216,0.000092321476,0.00040444738,0.000016239577,0.0009036675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98697716,0.0061189183,0.0020239723,0.0007070278,0.0036558975,0.0005170339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7990169,0.110421576,0.05887211,0.005930067,0.019868067,0.0058913697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017467992,0.00021294723,0.00052476564,0.0056069754,0.0013565511,0.0028645806,0.0004868574,0.00084547256,0.002241991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113068886,0.0003735064,0.00035003392,0.0054500448,0.00071269524,0.002689965,0.0012190796,0.00072851504,0.0008667467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013484487,0.00017857278,0.9569935,0.00016131153,0.000049596576,0.0001940694,0.017206604,0.000042002484,0.00079097744,0.0002426997,0.0018676639,0.022138117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027286274,0.00047663346,0.9429639,0.00012532691,0.000037146932,0.0007992216,0.040486053,0.0005764202,0.0005357988,0.00028898116,0.01363588,0.00004722502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013172458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019382465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99439305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008668305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016332173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09238064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324107625","doi":"10.7202/038161ar","title":"Strategic Science in the Public Interest: Canada’s Government Laboratories and Science-Based Agencies. By G. Bruce Doern and Jeffrey S. Kinder. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. xiii + 235 p., ill., bibl., tab., index. isbn 0-8020-8853-8 50$)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Library science; Index (typography); Media studies; Humanities; Sociology; Management; Art; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10731850456150373,"score_gpt":0.33722763822666096,"score_spread":0.22990913366515725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324107625","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026248748,0.87714356,0.0010063824,0.04154623,0.008855925,0.00004951424,0.0034121196,0.00020934253,0.06751435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007853054,0.6467746,0.003756128,0.007286001,0.0036041136,0.0000730951,0.004011918,0.00032518283,0.3263159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976216,0.00016178607,0.00014755085,0.00029175225,0.0015062457,0.00027105052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997661,0.0004197832,0.00022691402,0.00009676228,0.0011446307,0.00045099235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017545009,0.0030268575,0.0016259274,0.0073246057,0.0035627934,0.009583289,0.002082392,0.003711519,0.09537536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035017729,0.001586021,0.00067531527,0.029689122,0.004758778,0.0087628905,0.0028910472,0.004668525,0.046536967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139554495,0.0000045581605,0.00014688457,0.0006037632,0.000007485117,0.00002744059,0.00019164338,0.000087463704,0.00009221426,0.0040611266,0.9267907,0.06797275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004300762,0.000004343543,0.001051656,0.0005787579,0.0000072851394,0.000052873373,0.00028698065,0.000038302383,0.00005127567,0.0022097032,0.9957023,0.000012129683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.746442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9078285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038695175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044770043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51010245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333110603","doi":"10.1177/000841740907600201","title":"Are We Ready for an Impact Factor?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.9241897391965286,"score_gpt":0.6855952147089429,"score_spread":0.23859452448758567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333110603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012169431,0.08076015,0.07054523,0.6809703,0.06167884,0.00087610964,0.003491958,0.0028055953,0.086702466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4243792,0.13231505,0.22996615,0.110224456,0.05816142,0.0029006277,0.004811678,0.002911271,0.034330066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93336284,0.017543096,0.009231606,0.004236802,0.031936493,0.0036891084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7574892,0.12542298,0.018190073,0.014117587,0.06854476,0.016235473],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08364933,0.0031381126,0.0051270626,0.01752684,0.00439834,0.030354029,0.0038992264,0.006879573,0.027139895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34486192,0.0011162795,0.002966379,0.025407828,0.013832711,0.052687023,0.0065907864,0.013333414,0.01637904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027935536,0.00024559323,0.009667134,0.003302121,0.00043544834,0.00013385197,0.0012916455,0.00047833082,0.00047626405,0.16320737,0.23529606,0.5851867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001298074,0.00037626017,0.0124378875,0.0058482126,0.00024444127,0.00026598136,0.004900432,0.0010736354,0.0007363253,0.4930794,0.480464,0.00044362835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063755787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052863467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98995095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010049053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015222982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2333683414","doi":"10.1080/09737766.2015.1027095","title":"Analyzing Scientific Activities of the Top Ten Canadian Universities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Impact Fund","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Library science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.26334366484710725,"score_gpt":0.4467679308419103,"score_spread":0.18342426599480305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333683414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89461863,0.009072939,0.00077912706,0.0026947968,0.00010218929,0.00013575995,0.033107653,0.00012516411,0.059363704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979334,0.003366624,0.0008931204,0.000073367606,0.00003974657,0.000046988054,0.008401697,0.00001837189,0.007826079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99129665,0.00052914716,0.00033201216,0.00040450695,0.006001275,0.0014364286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96974796,0.0034943765,0.0035984316,0.00067606627,0.019415531,0.0030675572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004646786,0.0006007659,0.0006887833,0.025696924,0.0027199273,0.0051389597,0.0013172188,0.00043001588,0.0043344274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021418102,0.00024573636,0.0005650567,0.044067293,0.00068656914,0.00078764715,0.0022364012,0.00037260074,0.00060119154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025258167,0.00006940494,0.82333684,0.0011055337,0.00038783406,0.0003172876,0.0044867317,0.0037691812,0.0016708702,0.0072017806,0.02271764,0.13468425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012681383,0.000025480727,0.95350164,0.00021598223,0.00012662513,0.00006521131,0.0048033646,0.0018631391,0.0008811852,0.00041212304,0.038046006,0.00004660691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98005575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041045498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06919698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29780734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335326569","doi":"10.1177/0008417414561322","title":"Book Review: What editors want: An author’s guide to scientific journal publishing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7414328447026751,"score_gpt":0.6149463621724781,"score_spread":0.126486482530197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335326569","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035677603,0.21040128,0.015188569,0.53799987,0.18618657,0.001047157,0.0018593007,0.0039147185,0.04304578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033215585,0.19347307,0.055228647,0.32114446,0.19191821,0.003397144,0.0026383463,0.003149008,0.22572953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770732,0.0067376997,0.004135911,0.00093866483,0.010422753,0.0006917493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83561045,0.06324035,0.009145228,0.004630741,0.073582746,0.013790417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01882544,0.003245078,0.006494767,0.019675236,0.0041842205,0.017461503,0.004730113,0.015773963,0.038164042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09415724,0.0031108398,0.0019907572,0.01680772,0.0043191584,0.014314865,0.005124242,0.014960016,0.06439874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009528059,0.000033382374,0.00005548117,0.0002761397,0.000007827842,0.000037533136,0.00006659652,0.000026899319,0.00007329468,0.00035669655,0.97459376,0.024462854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032572018,0.000027524029,0.00033920805,0.001351469,0.000021229343,0.00029372884,0.00016963766,0.00014012076,0.00007414095,0.0030563788,0.9944555,0.000038513957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052363547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025267152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022692775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12767148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336963536","doi":"10.2182/cjot.05.0001","title":"From the Editor: Implications of the Impact Factor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Factor (programming language); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6208624312232792,"score_gpt":0.6112298540747436,"score_spread":0.009632577148535604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336963536","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003664085,0.0022525978,0.000119537384,0.105073094,0.8920408,0.000007808059,0.000027590942,0.000031578464,0.00041026768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00097443745,0.00241992,0.00021624767,0.074193664,0.91944116,0.00002034073,0.000019732575,0.000043052416,0.0026713875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97597015,0.0037683824,0.0039645084,0.002445143,0.012921206,0.00093048875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87961584,0.051934354,0.0046131243,0.0026234728,0.05421823,0.006994947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023099339,0.0037924035,0.0031389839,0.004600458,0.0058283256,0.014061948,0.0056285113,0.024630526,0.0065996903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14372821,0.0014657079,0.0025939473,0.0027974371,0.0046033124,0.0074871155,0.0032783537,0.03344241,0.005948914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028683227,0.000013774601,0.00006693122,0.00015486292,0.000018047118,0.000108171145,0.00002597353,0.000028508855,0.000030493065,0.00068835675,0.9926004,0.0062356004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009480412,0.00005056398,0.00057667017,0.00073641236,0.00009282586,0.00045388652,0.00012497281,0.0003820453,0.00031036432,0.0038605141,0.9932613,0.000055727523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030728197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052646445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99539953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058881817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007827727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1221624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336996183","doi":"","title":"Research in Canada and the Open Access Imperative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6428178466137359,"score_gpt":0.5444915822340336,"score_spread":0.09832626437970227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336996183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046976027,0.022165518,0.0016279381,0.80600053,0.0032734515,0.00005431405,0.000403728,0.00015265559,0.16162422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32554606,0.051729184,0.011201297,0.3709977,0.0044823727,0.00023071306,0.0009322482,0.0006199165,0.23426054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9348341,0.009419719,0.0020040653,0.0054785307,0.0347462,0.01351739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85526145,0.039433517,0.0034777103,0.0063898116,0.0526287,0.04280876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037916277,0.000722343,0.0015113206,0.0057333363,0.034724616,0.036843967,0.0038205667,0.016394733,0.020408535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06660579,0.0010663327,0.0010810755,0.012222044,0.04149545,0.01474187,0.013633687,0.017932799,0.0019823282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041177078,0.000026517524,0.0013159687,0.00017272645,0.000027529877,0.0003287552,0.0033458536,0.0002041233,0.0001582559,0.7446507,0.21943785,0.030290667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031690586,0.000015725065,0.0031950658,0.0005131876,0.000017653158,0.00009420618,0.003430127,0.000264967,0.00013915537,0.07810435,0.9141068,0.00008705413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9736294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99617946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19699955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47142288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9313667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337529989","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scv038","title":"What determines researchers’ scientific impact? A case study of Quebec researchers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8604730270441896,"score_gpt":0.6730168236645624,"score_spread":0.1874562033796272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337529989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98343074,0.0012485854,0.0003935347,0.002935165,0.0000133816775,0.00014894105,0.00078054937,0.000014877998,0.011034244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938544,0.0009921113,0.0009207959,0.00031801878,0.000011217675,0.000057579746,0.00027892715,0.000007464591,0.0035595347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959299,0.0016475358,0.0001725815,0.0002361187,0.0010314678,0.0009823162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96701336,0.017254582,0.002655257,0.00062993314,0.010050505,0.0023963326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005762235,0.0003544492,0.0005315517,0.004411267,0.008003778,0.0039686942,0.0012089734,0.0014483491,0.0027807597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020332865,0.00020719013,0.00030535008,0.016121304,0.0017186317,0.0012135648,0.0012219405,0.0009092128,0.00028721697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038504088,0.0007283402,0.8126692,0.0005210537,0.00016309752,0.0067569846,0.080407105,0.0018286206,0.0018206014,0.0075965687,0.009853489,0.0772698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009653968,0.00023135486,0.7950991,0.0004249347,0.00015719,0.00074032217,0.1665463,0.006244146,0.0012679565,0.0011124857,0.0279683,0.00011131898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98972857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051424097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046865635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3731097},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338153978","doi":"10.82308/43227","title":"A bibliometric analysis of Quebec's PhD students' contribution to the advancement of knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Workforce; Sociology; Population; Attribution; Medical education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Library science; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.45461326270658553,"score_gpt":0.5998687920653639,"score_spread":0.1452555293587784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338153978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8605872,0.0062875818,0.00555959,0.0030575139,0.00020722482,0.0004088977,0.038266208,0.00044066488,0.085185066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685695,0.0021806855,0.0039303843,0.000131972,0.00008254926,0.00016869964,0.008922726,0.0000465635,0.015966825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624324,0.0005688184,0.00028151303,0.00040787028,0.0022423132,0.00025634107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97084606,0.007614097,0.0021003727,0.0007955566,0.017495468,0.0011485002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004249816,0.00028731007,0.0006500807,0.027892485,0.002272948,0.0039721793,0.00081659254,0.00048085407,0.0050952043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031284545,0.00015631349,0.00039589524,0.053561848,0.00060234836,0.0009406763,0.0010936732,0.00040940157,0.0008095472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023245398,0.00009233481,0.71370625,0.0013973675,0.00050561386,0.00019852661,0.006515179,0.0027981699,0.0013268996,0.0038319067,0.030700175,0.23869503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012388132,0.000034788332,0.95167774,0.00020281844,0.00016239854,0.00007272331,0.0042697927,0.006390803,0.00080022705,0.00040063605,0.035932392,0.000043383396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80480736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88009167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017321356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0194708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39268428},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2339673439","doi":"10.3390/data1010004","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges (OA APC) Longitudinal Study 2015 Preliminary Dataset","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Computer science; Download; Data science; Metadata; Open data; Open science; World Wide Web; Census; Data access; Longitudinal data; Publishing; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Data mining; Database; Sociology","score_opus":0.9198208547898142,"score_gpt":0.7177078284484214,"score_spread":0.20211302634139283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339673439","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012864675,0.000036551868,0.00024106089,0.00021487399,0.000029569372,0.00019136493,0.9963509,0.00013189549,0.001517295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004128724,0.000046253957,0.0012259118,0.00013435705,0.000036418503,0.001354884,0.99008626,0.000083166655,0.002904035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948567,0.00081549014,0.0011339291,0.0006714453,0.0019093612,0.00061302877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96026474,0.006550281,0.0053253993,0.0053326315,0.020162592,0.002364331],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005515859,0.0006451673,0.0008382485,0.006604366,0.0015199562,0.0028796198,0.0020774554,0.001212994,0.08400635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042633936,0.00058795756,0.000807534,0.012053342,0.00040047345,0.0018077365,0.0024692041,0.001634749,0.047248743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019670799,0.00006513247,0.012129385,0.00039077285,0.000036987098,0.000036722966,0.00015262644,0.00014763339,0.00017030461,0.0016539864,0.97813684,0.0068828748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025365347,0.0000565198,0.06718731,0.00042097754,0.000046416695,0.00007728642,0.0005135185,0.00040220574,0.00044835458,0.0017708677,0.92875427,0.00006865669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054526478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10569882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037306992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009581967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28102922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339884644","doi":"10.1177/0340035216628879","title":"Faculty members’ perceptions and use of open access journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFLA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Open access publishing; Work (physics); Open access journal; Access to information; Political science; Sociology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Information access; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.9007622358608833,"score_gpt":0.708625094908831,"score_spread":0.19213714095205237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339884644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948703,0.00033331808,0.000090733614,0.0009047906,0.000016487189,0.000018714156,0.00004500631,0.000004698257,0.0037159647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981325,0.00048511522,0.00008916705,0.00022316087,0.000025361329,0.000012691717,0.000029487968,0.0000018317487,0.0010006682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995609,0.0016304207,0.00056379585,0.00020207767,0.0014517355,0.0005430425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612291,0.015421786,0.009959908,0.0009586619,0.004386643,0.008043824],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004626915,0.00016650982,0.0003597771,0.002022365,0.00264901,0.0038378867,0.00043583263,0.0010718324,0.005824343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030102277,0.00020678277,0.00031620258,0.0021513791,0.0013733257,0.0017838513,0.0017076578,0.0007654053,0.00073327514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003021297,0.0009351043,0.7394249,0.00034899,0.00009387924,0.0010131438,0.18618146,0.00021194463,0.0041436558,0.0012008959,0.0025471768,0.06359679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030351046,0.00079765223,0.5553124,0.00022625548,0.00005440281,0.0009957578,0.4244329,0.00030885168,0.0012334056,0.0007148766,0.015786912,0.00010617526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004065818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040979045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012837223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018191169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024469733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340061204","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y","title":"Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Austrian Science Fund; Multiple Sclerosis Society; Impact Fund","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Citation; Computer science; Citation index; Library science; Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Index (typography); Scientometrics; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8693361966360683,"score_gpt":0.5759535144275153,"score_spread":0.293382682208553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340061204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22543873,0.009634805,0.56212807,0.14295442,0.0011128936,0.0035326926,0.02056968,0.0027674688,0.0318613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51595354,0.0025856406,0.4634898,0.0024614902,0.0006441375,0.0017482701,0.009835994,0.0007218743,0.0025592311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8624039,0.06921809,0.029216433,0.006014586,0.02943402,0.0037129428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45850864,0.3694922,0.039355803,0.05993002,0.06686902,0.005844309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16469558,0.0011525287,0.002132979,0.025773853,0.0045947446,0.03366101,0.0064830035,0.005318374,0.0029687057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45805377,0.0017420523,0.0024990006,0.040565226,0.006107618,0.035515457,0.004830148,0.00807985,0.0011729018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072224066,0.0005582044,0.18822394,0.0032849961,0.00037515545,0.00085348956,0.0065565356,0.008580989,0.0070307795,0.4102995,0.03156363,0.34195048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024199154,0.00052606984,0.11577949,0.011830906,0.0008020016,0.004059226,0.023946749,0.1318206,0.023083327,0.45203233,0.23502757,0.00084977853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015113875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020213518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084942505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013739568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87100387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340281142","doi":"","title":"Детерминанты продуктивности научных исследований в сфере высшего образования: эмпирический анализ","year":2012,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Foresight-Russia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boulevard; Political science; Humanities; Library science; Geography; Art; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6063460508656627,"score_gpt":0.5746615332045012,"score_spread":0.03168451766116154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340281142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031519137,0.011551132,0.0607752,0.03177854,0.0015590803,0.00036699482,0.0014953603,0.00042009886,0.8605345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.597316,0.014900105,0.07104989,0.003080721,0.0007371792,0.00073695916,0.0011534486,0.00062670716,0.31039897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930803,0.0017666521,0.00028459128,0.0008657145,0.0032884052,0.00071435655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941262,0.0014913006,0.00044918858,0.000790082,0.0024837384,0.00065951643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047458056,0.0008086937,0.0005087393,0.002702352,0.004665085,0.011424568,0.0014620022,0.00232127,0.05357918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091590015,0.0007708802,0.0006686479,0.002765633,0.0074276696,0.0047596926,0.0034719063,0.002797166,0.011354207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012410297,0.00008689369,0.004849104,0.0005790941,0.00004051076,0.0006492062,0.0066411356,0.0013076697,0.0032591166,0.79315704,0.03928938,0.1500168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033398042,0.000051831354,0.0068442095,0.0004920711,0.000044587985,0.00064590265,0.0069979834,0.001296886,0.0023018413,0.19610845,0.7850889,0.00009397806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07603262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1070768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99729764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010827173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017879374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17924023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343412908","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0154741","title":"Stability and Longevity in the Publication Careers of U.S. Doctorate Recipients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universiteit Leiden","keywords":"Longevity; Gerontology; Medicine; Library science; Demography; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7471074497942597,"score_gpt":0.5082519046694423,"score_spread":0.23885554512481744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343412908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98984575,0.0025668642,0.0002269529,0.001578547,0.00006810009,0.0000071745076,0.002761499,0.00001857585,0.002926628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952224,0.0010106437,0.00013111088,0.00011559928,0.00014437582,0.00001067605,0.0017126693,0.000009406633,0.0016432008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776495,0.00056258583,0.00037941642,0.00038735458,0.0005282168,0.00037748946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526551,0.009329513,0.025421876,0.0022441612,0.004862939,0.0054865093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060067237,0.00013466287,0.00031701545,0.006330055,0.00084228907,0.001879478,0.00044757177,0.00047918095,0.0051152674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03131055,0.00013116043,0.00030557494,0.009307537,0.00046164653,0.0016135835,0.0014619039,0.00056811573,0.0015320143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021265613,0.00006218837,0.96979666,0.00008095368,0.00007277571,0.00007881525,0.0018025968,0.00013553492,0.0002804337,0.0007816422,0.0024857563,0.024210012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008549954,0.00005792048,0.9931151,0.00003654093,0.000026287888,0.00011569969,0.0012944844,0.00017628034,0.0001742253,0.00029837762,0.0046866843,0.000009877475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032558632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032203877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066291756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091284286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03176695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344317462","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckv175.055","title":"Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Acces and Subscription Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.968831959127659,"score_gpt":0.7449286306432208,"score_spread":0.22390332848443817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344317462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13775429,0.51137197,0.106137045,0.03242742,0.010243349,0.05902496,0.11659148,0.0012448352,0.025204686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6297573,0.09611828,0.11435366,0.007365023,0.0046725776,0.10452709,0.039245058,0.0008562561,0.0031047482],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.32799175,0.1870041,0.37687337,0.018272288,0.08726741,0.0025910253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11732861,0.44098014,0.25824302,0.058596995,0.12061244,0.0042387974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3897489,0.0017016643,0.008919419,0.05475894,0.0027062548,0.012637604,0.0052132863,0.0030545027,0.009254184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7375809,0.0018695117,0.010766635,0.05479148,0.00493135,0.0066148355,0.008163082,0.0025464417,0.0009446343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040842574,0.00023350684,0.17649865,0.5430935,0.040329646,0.0007376595,0.017312927,0.0014512306,0.0016676926,0.009007566,0.019526144,0.18605722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037454204,0.0017451552,0.35468984,0.3223598,0.054387685,0.0025131658,0.010610193,0.0027547923,0.0041333,0.029034788,0.21308693,0.00093896175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004951053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004939035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94524103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00657072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018916704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7525483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345444281","doi":"10.14507/epaa.24.2391","title":"Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening open access scholarly publishing in Brazil","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Political science; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Open access publishing; Library science; Open science; Sociology; Regional science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.5781505496477423,"score_gpt":0.6231597253924955,"score_spread":0.04500917574475327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345444281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94955295,0.0026060482,0.002558013,0.0036084673,0.00004304325,0.00017061186,0.00053283805,0.000046067114,0.04088204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676454,0.0008851821,0.001687733,0.000050289233,0.000017206841,0.000025556534,0.00011878824,0.0000059268673,0.00044477993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98135614,0.005626469,0.002192428,0.0008977106,0.008955421,0.0009717259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8943615,0.0506851,0.023398606,0.004605701,0.023101393,0.0038477008],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019709213,0.0002866698,0.0005827789,0.010179863,0.0014695016,0.005001219,0.00078154664,0.0004314396,0.0010863112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10557151,0.0002467052,0.00030279264,0.0142388,0.0022482835,0.002882969,0.0029629276,0.00046315248,0.0001836236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113257236,0.00016739915,0.71545476,0.0011956926,0.00016411737,0.00050700107,0.020838458,0.001566556,0.0029403393,0.031114759,0.0022598866,0.22367786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004775533,0.00027489712,0.88638383,0.0013048679,0.00028248495,0.00055449404,0.030811192,0.0060045086,0.0035429809,0.015517846,0.055180386,0.00009474674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029680897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038384188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99921846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012642193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10423356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347064474","doi":"","title":"La Société de biologie de Montréal","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.16036911103304416,"score_gpt":0.3888945520918772,"score_spread":0.22852544105883302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347064474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039137516,0.19795805,0.0077483426,0.07029907,0.012126651,0.00026963008,0.050867215,0.0024810224,0.6191125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18928783,0.06566625,0.008945776,0.0027415992,0.0027132556,0.00023252155,0.007636105,0.00045934692,0.72231734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972257,0.0003704031,0.00010897534,0.00053072366,0.0012796525,0.00048448294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963212,0.0005663766,0.00035382522,0.000249073,0.001541121,0.0009683331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015713149,0.0016931688,0.0010703508,0.00608136,0.004618308,0.007787832,0.0011722238,0.0013414513,0.08974352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044552693,0.0005056966,0.0007686639,0.009648791,0.0018347079,0.0020104905,0.001667025,0.002780933,0.009221892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021662582,0.00009588478,0.019472077,0.0010740337,0.0002541061,0.0008947828,0.0014494844,0.0012822624,0.0027985398,0.20224623,0.39468303,0.375533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002167915,0.0000134998445,0.04044684,0.00016179378,0.000027920782,0.00015680186,0.0003174719,0.00022779121,0.00048635816,0.0018864359,0.95619905,0.000054291122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92788035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94243634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96163225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038367752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05161613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30022198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2351189444","doi":"","title":"Community Analysis of Contributors to the Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural science Edition)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Academic community; Statistic; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; History; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3292462983404808,"score_gpt":0.5161310629486875,"score_spread":0.1868847646082067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2351189444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977234,0.00091546023,0.0009050119,0.00022378322,0.0000850259,0.0001914751,0.012720584,0.00012808017,0.0075965608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781674,0.0004910058,0.0023105473,0.000032898693,0.00010727626,0.00021752146,0.011992891,0.00004561024,0.0066349665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537164,0.0008321047,0.00074601936,0.00069737015,0.0019173812,0.00043553807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96183085,0.012269103,0.007535972,0.0016159932,0.013540832,0.0032072384],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045113196,0.00025679212,0.00059538294,0.04015718,0.0016785612,0.0019448791,0.0005183425,0.0003245853,0.004099491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028065303,0.00015305237,0.0006131127,0.028820848,0.0005347775,0.0011211209,0.0013239438,0.0003276727,0.0007475551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003252773,0.000093384966,0.9353152,0.00035004556,0.00020125155,0.00022478763,0.003051334,0.00022379981,0.0012361887,0.00071043376,0.006100067,0.05216823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011225388,0.000077978584,0.98428303,0.000033007916,0.00005665866,0.0002678668,0.0025838949,0.00085330766,0.00038406314,0.00023889817,0.011183635,0.000026462525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011823005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018884126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011371413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001993979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023858488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2352347750","doi":"","title":"Scientometric Analyses of International Scientific and Technological Collaboration in China Agricultural University","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ke-ji guanli yanjiu","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; China; Agriculture; Productivity; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation index; Index (typography); Web of science; Regional science; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Political science; Agricultural economics; Business; Library science; Geography; Computer science; Economic growth; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.5480170889054111,"score_gpt":0.5400153282784598,"score_spread":0.008001760626951349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2352347750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757077,0.0016994699,0.002614519,0.00052287284,0.00006128795,0.00011396216,0.0023515539,0.00008862433,0.016840003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958175,0.0006415444,0.00082289375,0.00002182209,0.00007565469,0.00008524877,0.0015463779,0.000007797136,0.0009812461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372673,0.0014117218,0.00082586444,0.00038738508,0.0029869552,0.00066123676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863623,0.0048673362,0.003056158,0.0007538628,0.0038027393,0.0011575853],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005188098,0.00048117916,0.00094980735,0.050975226,0.0015624297,0.0033319013,0.00059685047,0.0005527167,0.0021950807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028961157,0.00016476918,0.0012741898,0.084908105,0.00057053997,0.0022625367,0.001961569,0.00039034573,0.00033992814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017713272,0.00018195051,0.86745864,0.00044873063,0.00060337834,0.00036163567,0.003491999,0.008418917,0.0007179344,0.010476382,0.006175462,0.101487815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017154762,0.00004604418,0.97321826,0.000050575673,0.00015967009,0.00010608068,0.0027825986,0.014784092,0.00053097884,0.0027960534,0.0054729064,0.000035633635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022618003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014958343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9490248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046450263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051534665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044972718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238235889","doi":"","title":"L’IMPACT ÉCONOMIQUE DES ACTIVITÉS DE RECHERCHE DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8706807546330027,"score_gpt":0.5824398678235222,"score_spread":0.28824088680948046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238235889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74978983,0.022959039,0.0042848056,0.03055007,0.00058157457,0.000087801105,0.0069667753,0.0002959616,0.1844842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404223,0.0060903453,0.0023889493,0.00056425005,0.00033818165,0.000080031794,0.0017297809,0.00008030114,0.048305918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856441,0.0058151805,0.00037498926,0.00088054984,0.005100469,0.0021848194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784272,0.011434935,0.0015048127,0.00074965926,0.004753462,0.003129878],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006203026,0.0007430303,0.00095096824,0.0049837045,0.002352474,0.009367132,0.00089341414,0.002047511,0.017519347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020017179,0.0004939469,0.0011335085,0.0062704966,0.0014303438,0.002981237,0.0022700485,0.0023549665,0.002699481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005449664,0.001260251,0.24569558,0.0014102046,0.0013955429,0.0015738558,0.005886532,0.029532313,0.008805971,0.23993568,0.056609727,0.40244475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064028596,0.0005899424,0.6800439,0.0006354269,0.00034325127,0.0005981743,0.0062118242,0.010847529,0.011825619,0.009926453,0.27812722,0.00021038734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28282633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25756764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022777447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014317273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56236017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385065028","doi":"10.29173/cais252","title":"Faculty Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing, E-Print Servers and Institutional Repositories","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Humanities; Qualitative research; Library science; Access to information; Political science; Sociology; Information access; Art; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.39536613943876375,"score_gpt":0.490222336731854,"score_spread":0.09485619729309025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385065028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97258943,0.00054685277,0.0013714491,0.004651665,0.00007035385,0.00006569919,0.00006812462,0.000034709643,0.020601848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940876,0.00042865708,0.00041071896,0.00076117815,0.00006256454,0.00004171081,0.000023146962,0.00002106779,0.004163467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725232,0.015514575,0.0015484014,0.00078886305,0.0074895406,0.0021353639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91525435,0.056426957,0.0118092485,0.0024651452,0.0064194906,0.007624758],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016624462,0.00018106832,0.00038725178,0.0020344888,0.0057110605,0.007769879,0.0007778265,0.0014329836,0.008728737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06289342,0.00026426456,0.00029794255,0.003540257,0.005352765,0.005450368,0.0043314667,0.0012293531,0.00091194053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028881698,0.0005520371,0.15620881,0.0005250462,0.00004143586,0.0012353127,0.73776746,0.00032209512,0.004486363,0.012238253,0.0035520948,0.08278225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032901684,0.0005345161,0.046006072,0.00025604674,0.000033043158,0.00071641675,0.8988096,0.00033510115,0.0022140145,0.0025864218,0.048402403,0.00007351781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039919424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039402666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99922216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003417804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004733879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08791965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394801617","doi":"","title":"Is there a gender gap in social media metrics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Citation; Visibility; Dissemination; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Data science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9068326217978037,"score_gpt":0.6403701424126986,"score_spread":0.26646247938510503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394801617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.859405,0.018365828,0.009848325,0.029151697,0.0012553668,0.00023199283,0.007835484,0.00016347441,0.07374286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199486,0.0017438855,0.0014911315,0.0012329037,0.00032504456,0.00014919463,0.0010803689,0.00007258543,0.0019100448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98510355,0.005646204,0.0013975401,0.0016087199,0.0052071577,0.0010368674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8865811,0.07018378,0.02078494,0.005299104,0.01438864,0.002762429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022029184,0.00031365652,0.00077344826,0.0055390066,0.0007460453,0.0039192946,0.0009134484,0.0007197017,0.0078053577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14017132,0.00020353173,0.0007333932,0.006296507,0.0014352669,0.004718226,0.0025418485,0.00061324274,0.0018846358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076061295,0.00016907959,0.7182458,0.0012334434,0.00052622095,0.00023200626,0.02030988,0.00016819393,0.0011035168,0.016563617,0.011009766,0.2296779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005037234,0.0005165804,0.8809584,0.0017690898,0.00026351342,0.0007335611,0.024936464,0.0009368745,0.0020304993,0.021149516,0.06656874,0.000086392225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027365203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027146782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011120108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013439294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11650282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398145044","doi":"","title":"Local, Networked or External? Inclusion of Regional Journals in WoS and its Effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Web of science; Visibility; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Regional science; Country of origin; Library science; Process (computing); Geography; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.3468037079446216,"score_gpt":0.4807593991302107,"score_spread":0.1339556911855891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398145044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749732,0.0030331996,0.00060888997,0.0017803682,0.00010593835,0.000054917127,0.00037851266,0.000048977057,0.019015985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961223,0.0008983577,0.0002591075,0.00018145845,0.00016004247,0.000025397781,0.00017950062,0.00003179228,0.0021419919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823246,0.009015597,0.0012745782,0.0019834484,0.0034291707,0.0019725752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9034685,0.04530206,0.030106094,0.0052687633,0.0077701556,0.008084501],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008546274,0.0005865258,0.0012986629,0.0044184057,0.0014619464,0.006950434,0.0014124432,0.00083600864,0.0070214965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066641875,0.0002905722,0.0010411498,0.008499103,0.0034119715,0.0045644213,0.0087965205,0.0011011967,0.0017812363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018045438,0.00050935673,0.89213455,0.0011166424,0.00082957844,0.0015132232,0.017000124,0.0007079508,0.0016262026,0.0052298834,0.0020820864,0.075445786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051400606,0.0006253294,0.96192145,0.0005744464,0.0006749681,0.0005506857,0.018082116,0.000352687,0.0012763205,0.0013743681,0.014476247,0.000039998016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066187843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053932676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99558157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012810187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020132689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045197606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398291537","doi":"","title":"The Scholarly Communications Needs of Faculty: An Evidence-Based Foundation for the Development of Library Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Demographics; Public relations; Descriptive statistics; Exploratory research; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Library science; Psychology; Medical education; Social science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.7676021748909762,"score_gpt":0.5912851169884951,"score_spread":0.1763170579024811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398291537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45126954,0.26727343,0.012578925,0.18362364,0.00273418,0.014215172,0.0029080126,0.00027372074,0.065123335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86859334,0.07661786,0.04147627,0.0075170086,0.00042471747,0.0033237014,0.0011543036,0.000055951517,0.00083687715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90067977,0.06157149,0.013434153,0.0029530416,0.018300423,0.0030610724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38938197,0.50665146,0.039690323,0.009684963,0.046713155,0.007878157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13844225,0.0010745304,0.0021721625,0.013697676,0.0044362536,0.013757128,0.007861325,0.0056544337,0.012333619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3694842,0.0019768951,0.003786427,0.011309504,0.0063387477,0.016448013,0.009350244,0.0054091364,0.0013308998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016075663,0.0048517333,0.21317479,0.13146922,0.003128168,0.00044391467,0.030834304,0.0008910327,0.00041159242,0.014195316,0.010493865,0.58849853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017374802,0.004523649,0.25589293,0.50365597,0.007616946,0.0005886627,0.15214929,0.0036761626,0.0016725335,0.013650351,0.054431,0.0004050431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02000259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036350757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015308258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080683514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73216134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398388134","doi":"","title":"Mapping the Spreading of Cited References over Research Fronts of Bibliographically Coupled Publications.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Information retrieval; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Regional science; Geography","score_opus":0.6159169730986401,"score_gpt":0.5103022726215511,"score_spread":0.10561470047708899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398388134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797425,0.018920915,0.024435543,0.0010291549,0.00068189425,0.00023836186,0.027344696,0.0010490833,0.046557814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340108,0.0066312994,0.03703744,0.00013985902,0.000352382,0.00024919776,0.014834416,0.0002637028,0.0064809453],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954483,0.00072320213,0.0005080337,0.0009210996,0.0021433954,0.00025605567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676399,0.017877346,0.004661447,0.0021489728,0.006783306,0.0008890433],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030280135,0.0005291349,0.0007250361,0.044432193,0.0012067207,0.0047731176,0.0009663371,0.0011964343,0.0070224716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051650748,0.00033951583,0.00083115115,0.060190074,0.00062900485,0.0030701843,0.002313958,0.0009039195,0.0032567375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001122849,0.00021875302,0.36041674,0.0074032913,0.0019651775,0.0014256941,0.010163399,0.006842441,0.04247273,0.019813417,0.0195086,0.5286469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112074435,0.00030208257,0.80816257,0.0013119553,0.0017385317,0.0029715514,0.011092927,0.024522642,0.017577825,0.03277583,0.09919424,0.00023776059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063135033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108051235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95556784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009816553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014659042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023492515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399886288","doi":"","title":"Are scientists really publishing more","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Publishing; Research centre; Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.8258740596986458,"score_gpt":0.6279488991770902,"score_spread":0.19792516052155562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399886288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012444034,0.039006703,0.00076809234,0.40213102,0.09598714,0.00017979245,0.013378503,0.0013856909,0.43471894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10095833,0.04950437,0.0030042704,0.11039687,0.10913581,0.00031746825,0.013649395,0.0013132103,0.61172026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825404,0.0032179975,0.0015692498,0.0022087821,0.008424887,0.0020386558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.890743,0.019306399,0.013912961,0.008300388,0.03236332,0.03537391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085001355,0.0007239432,0.0016879723,0.00559116,0.0028324812,0.028681612,0.0014652454,0.0069524776,0.29861155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05987032,0.0007457763,0.0010501787,0.01724833,0.002160692,0.015489266,0.0029021115,0.002536911,0.10707089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008230336,0.000042816144,0.0035619247,0.0008529697,0.000057397527,0.00010494603,0.0003186683,0.000040580173,0.00031824963,0.005196435,0.92813164,0.06129208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051538922,0.000043582164,0.005438671,0.00025414792,0.00005230054,0.00016808456,0.0006737092,0.00004196343,0.00023409788,0.0025431376,0.99046004,0.000038809867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069689746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99440885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039147716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009248274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399945540","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.013","title":"Science as a money-spinner?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Thrombosis Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Quality (philosophy); Sentence; Publishing; Computer science; Political science; Internet privacy; Law","score_opus":0.7318513184971535,"score_gpt":0.7031173844164208,"score_spread":0.02873393408073266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399945540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079380686,0.0100104725,0.00085811917,0.9206724,0.020232072,0.000014423149,0.00005604016,0.00010154754,0.047261104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06873154,0.026959704,0.0018716983,0.7473711,0.026951768,0.00013637276,0.00012737175,0.00040292557,0.12744755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285334,0.0027155667,0.00020761923,0.0008417276,0.0018541644,0.0015276205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98582226,0.0033615425,0.0010660309,0.0010658458,0.002273939,0.0064103077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00993875,0.00090890797,0.0011346942,0.0018524386,0.009515841,0.025770063,0.0016681936,0.016844701,0.047219027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03301769,0.0004953355,0.00059718086,0.0021042048,0.025192685,0.043854054,0.008764242,0.022690598,0.02028795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003731205,0.00003278176,0.00033478942,0.000091405425,0.000010728431,0.00014579143,0.0013597877,0.000045044755,0.000094896444,0.36529744,0.6063494,0.026200498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011267526,0.000021742475,0.00015191792,0.00023169575,0.0000037607076,0.000101864265,0.0019452774,0.000067338886,0.00006799271,0.16180883,0.8355659,0.000022482127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003074522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003661664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005931199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009212982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1579634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404055720","doi":"","title":"Re-citation Analysis: A Promising Method for Improving Citation Analysis for Research Evaluation, Knowledge Network Analysis, Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Data science; Weighting; Representation (politics); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.7525166480474529,"score_gpt":0.6656323923442183,"score_spread":0.08688425570323455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404055720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048656226,0.017486207,0.9454556,0.0036144897,0.001822473,0.0013273063,0.003662436,0.007576772,0.014189077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0860462,0.013486425,0.87698996,0.00076117757,0.0021817973,0.0018557439,0.00403084,0.0027268422,0.011921011],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94640183,0.02804085,0.0049023246,0.0047454215,0.015252687,0.0006568615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8347558,0.089564234,0.019398447,0.025474349,0.029374419,0.0014327257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052604057,0.003603956,0.00452878,0.07670572,0.0033058547,0.01257292,0.0054859566,0.003197546,0.014693068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20848875,0.0012356603,0.004018955,0.08386712,0.002533025,0.017243084,0.0042450805,0.004172037,0.010544672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112348855,0.00015022415,0.0065069865,0.0031764095,0.0013917545,0.00015156461,0.001469063,0.0049831048,0.0024281659,0.08821656,0.042886805,0.8485271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012708944,0.00022119773,0.016797042,0.0022166842,0.0012443529,0.0012140874,0.0014666711,0.12178738,0.011260894,0.52657604,0.316354,0.0007345415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057019265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008087749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038076637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056041395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2782002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407021461","doi":"","title":"A Computer System for Automatic Evaluation of Researchers' Performance.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Competition (biology); Data science","score_opus":0.9069353518281346,"score_gpt":0.6606327712208294,"score_spread":0.24630258060730514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407021461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212789,0.0020702584,0.54979396,0.0007757474,0.000816331,0.0037968098,0.03370402,0.35967183,0.01724307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27829677,0.0009281566,0.6600962,0.00067939394,0.00058363355,0.007923979,0.031289313,0.003265426,0.016937021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332774,0.002005911,0.0009240725,0.0015284583,0.0020172612,0.00019644809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711,0.00571883,0.001438018,0.0016669923,0.003632474,0.00043381544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066541834,0.001529385,0.0016997877,0.010989892,0.000803938,0.0022384718,0.0012318669,0.0011870617,0.021716118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020918652,0.0005427545,0.0006421118,0.006819513,0.0004081616,0.0025984182,0.0016945992,0.00093542325,0.014972459],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015666186,0.00041874475,0.016149597,0.0011567186,0.00040763363,0.0002476886,0.00042920356,0.0039731613,0.022764012,0.00419027,0.13388816,0.81480813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327444,0.0016143741,0.11062307,0.00062864664,0.00071816426,0.0017981627,0.00053784024,0.48221466,0.090180196,0.02464083,0.28501996,0.0006966658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026644063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019927307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012646139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017116357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07264763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407471590","doi":"","title":"Topical Impact Analysis - A New Informetric Indicator for the Assessment of a Scientific Institution.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Informetrics; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.36218617606028575,"score_gpt":0.5208127322852348,"score_spread":0.1586265562249491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407471590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37848046,0.052608173,0.29843795,0.0067178775,0.002604902,0.00087338453,0.019278778,0.003428049,0.23757042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918674,0.010348352,0.081613004,0.00034761787,0.0016930155,0.00034275115,0.0048551527,0.00019251494,0.008740149],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915537,0.0019304793,0.0005682412,0.0004051366,0.0052340273,0.00030849606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760804,0.009693192,0.0057303472,0.0014536642,0.0053228606,0.0017193797],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006564184,0.0007764705,0.0009251094,0.048130807,0.0010458925,0.004866276,0.0008510655,0.00094221,0.0061771097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030359771,0.00021699586,0.00077300624,0.03135183,0.0013206041,0.0055620386,0.0025633702,0.0010207541,0.0024317189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006486872,0.0004125059,0.23021132,0.0027142947,0.0007632255,0.0005159757,0.0012058932,0.004704406,0.02688103,0.061341107,0.034448866,0.6361527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118616386,0.0013922595,0.5029821,0.0014386296,0.0021586306,0.00541453,0.010577857,0.06345674,0.048162226,0.15587828,0.20800337,0.00041673848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009039113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019710325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9518692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014705502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018362822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034715116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407843740","doi":"","title":"Taking the plunge: open access at the Canadian Journal of Sociology .","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.9397650483329004,"score_gpt":0.7333829324763228,"score_spread":0.20638211585657762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407843740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007978524,0.04850808,0.008737468,0.3667683,0.024423052,0.00042758635,0.0136644235,0.0045982627,0.5248943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11985929,0.033017255,0.015247848,0.02954928,0.007598243,0.0003525678,0.007769226,0.002647105,0.78395915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98442346,0.0012451832,0.000495174,0.0007492566,0.010908629,0.0021782902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92659765,0.011863349,0.001586308,0.0067238435,0.024728267,0.028500617],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013274493,0.00065908366,0.001087618,0.017646836,0.016618501,0.023561552,0.0026313036,0.0061522336,0.17034416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07031811,0.0008851076,0.00073039066,0.019490745,0.007687098,0.018313995,0.008734507,0.0046955324,0.024894824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003950987,0.000026551792,0.0010698944,0.00017917017,0.000013743789,0.00017510349,0.0015360368,0.00006022709,0.0003126263,0.044053074,0.8718861,0.08064792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006221361,0.0000064150545,0.0030555723,0.00019662527,0.000006781537,0.00004221486,0.0015100093,0.000095205716,0.00012388824,0.012203701,0.9827099,0.000043395234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6418165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8549643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023542408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124017455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7205858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408332672","doi":"10.29173/cais856","title":"Exploring Author Similarity Using Citing Discipline Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Similarity (geometry); Citation; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.5936086054044273,"score_gpt":0.48107286183188674,"score_spread":0.11253574357254054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408332672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74334306,0.0022757174,0.21934481,0.00037074715,0.00018749369,0.0004705937,0.0019455397,0.0010010946,0.031060904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90447897,0.0006336379,0.091117166,0.000038067832,0.00016824756,0.0002840533,0.0009813948,0.000088425826,0.0022101523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909416,0.0021705946,0.0010704857,0.0008860638,0.0046263156,0.00030500098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95969254,0.01909222,0.006626688,0.0032305478,0.010328558,0.0010295904],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058412068,0.0005746812,0.0012893474,0.053147316,0.0020072362,0.0057573933,0.0010988002,0.001171279,0.004104443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04422965,0.00026801456,0.0008490851,0.034798197,0.0008535067,0.0043967487,0.0027021514,0.0006486449,0.0015123175],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049982715,0.00036860572,0.31850678,0.0010782356,0.0009648406,0.00048647323,0.0084496755,0.006504732,0.02093554,0.020895742,0.0025012244,0.61880827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023165507,0.0012048444,0.54947823,0.0006647585,0.0015592023,0.002704924,0.02109997,0.19440779,0.05541407,0.12406208,0.04852057,0.00065193576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021944332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028499719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011514797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017577015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030891657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409294402","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2015-0188","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.6245645015783493,"score_gpt":0.5747646215364831,"score_spread":0.049799880041866196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409294402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18675482,0.0076172766,0.12513474,0.19893366,0.011431755,0.0011143323,0.002020283,0.004406988,0.46258616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79268193,0.0022713898,0.068801574,0.02568715,0.012211746,0.0009322997,0.0011084079,0.0019967235,0.09430872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8798844,0.050279878,0.010205084,0.008953025,0.04455312,0.006124364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44137233,0.22745194,0.05040023,0.11182808,0.08390454,0.085042834],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08042319,0.0008120211,0.0019266724,0.015805777,0.0049163387,0.048329502,0.0038979575,0.0075480198,0.06027001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37530702,0.000981305,0.0018566464,0.021072846,0.0060291314,0.045274485,0.026646782,0.0051930198,0.01811902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089000055,0.0010785698,0.04715717,0.0014411184,0.0005059414,0.0011381891,0.015927246,0.0011800412,0.0054576006,0.16411811,0.0890551,0.67205095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051265984,0.0003467226,0.022154639,0.0007147473,0.00027252827,0.0020997934,0.012579737,0.0023580047,0.002754293,0.49753836,0.45825514,0.0004133552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009062725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023164449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99610204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003934056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013590477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42532355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411736692","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100051751","title":"Reproduction of Tables: Are Some Publishers Ignoring Fair Use/Dealing?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.36360645825098276,"score_gpt":0.4455562030640123,"score_spread":0.08194974481302952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411736692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042813644,0.0064508347,0.029187638,0.33200133,0.22260977,0.0022296847,0.027689543,0.016309604,0.3592402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06388981,0.014790414,0.08997503,0.1395804,0.08224014,0.0049150614,0.024099559,0.020962609,0.559547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9517764,0.015677981,0.009917377,0.0027583444,0.018179178,0.0016906207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66210437,0.13236812,0.018568527,0.06492487,0.11378214,0.00825201],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03496155,0.0014872744,0.0020260871,0.007837588,0.0039142934,0.025294922,0.0039057452,0.0035513479,0.27506432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33856326,0.0015705371,0.0011101384,0.026265886,0.0067565925,0.012547165,0.004836017,0.0067494544,0.30113778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003835562,0.00001928789,0.00037528106,0.00020579185,0.000010514032,0.000061363404,0.00023028546,0.000066890396,0.0002344828,0.007505013,0.9538103,0.037442427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036246125,0.000026180405,0.00086644036,0.00052984164,0.000010913159,0.00014216168,0.00062745786,0.0003335844,0.000289376,0.009583705,0.9875165,0.000037572005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027600059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033460048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031923966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009927177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9201818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418684042","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000001261","title":"Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Task (project management); Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.7712254249724037,"score_gpt":0.6039173745100554,"score_spread":0.1673080504623482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418684042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98282295,0.003579901,0.0009997715,0.00341613,0.00015171431,0.00002264203,0.00018699677,0.0000074848363,0.008812432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981822,0.00066950405,0.0001589693,0.00023861002,0.00007055343,0.000015888343,0.00003624977,0.000006130212,0.000621813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375147,0.0036877382,0.00045708194,0.00073203346,0.00078119204,0.0005905408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354179,0.04332249,0.013931903,0.0021900772,0.0021794303,0.0029581627],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009492682,0.00022564622,0.00045395966,0.0023683333,0.0013236948,0.0022219105,0.00043864083,0.00048155908,0.0054992246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068431236,0.00021238271,0.00029550825,0.0023005141,0.0019986092,0.0030243793,0.0018200012,0.000602101,0.00064671127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005478343,0.00008915091,0.8992696,0.00021231381,0.0000930612,0.00033371404,0.04594661,0.000041076095,0.0003869222,0.0041909665,0.0019035601,0.04698517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028893248,0.00028248667,0.9030231,0.0008717715,0.00011213539,0.0010642052,0.07079009,0.00026859457,0.0004562486,0.008042528,0.015026197,0.00003380064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016451534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023763087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99763167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059636997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011323112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050202668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418933540","doi":"10.1002/14651858.ed000048","title":"Measuring the Performance of the Cochrane Library","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cochrane Library; Medicine; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Cochrane collaboration; Computer science; Information retrieval; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.4596414138216831,"score_gpt":0.5011663737875138,"score_spread":0.04152495996583072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418933540","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006071163,0.69204533,0.00845706,0.085224256,0.18614794,0.004503308,0.0020486063,0.000921411,0.02004504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02385175,0.70070547,0.04809224,0.060276523,0.1338536,0.017518854,0.0023576242,0.00097519474,0.012368734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5874163,0.19228137,0.08581565,0.010615433,0.12152673,0.0023445166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40687975,0.3533025,0.054243095,0.017318727,0.1580124,0.010243564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17555082,0.003853796,0.0135282995,0.056721654,0.0028672977,0.023984807,0.00798804,0.012494804,0.01640865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6357953,0.004077131,0.004744549,0.03874415,0.006749045,0.010494541,0.005597038,0.010641907,0.005497783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047231725,0.000041716747,0.00040766958,0.08834947,0.0023207888,0.00008712644,0.00024461214,0.0004894753,0.00014407859,0.007540184,0.71172696,0.18817565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008862698,0.00039429197,0.0016325312,0.18666594,0.006214635,0.00052938296,0.00019707443,0.0017084324,0.000664515,0.01215657,0.78864264,0.000307749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065468526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008788832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9432784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024645517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05514162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92841256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423366126","doi":"10.18438/b85p87","title":"E-Journal Metrics for Collection Management: Exploring Disciplinary Usage Differences in Scopus and Web of Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publication; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Discipline; Journal ranking; Proxy (statistics); Computer science; Download; Publishing; Impact factor; The Internet; Web of science; Citation impact; World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.4265154132052441,"score_gpt":0.48440355262765317,"score_spread":0.05788813942240906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423366126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819806,0.0011249204,0.0070946966,0.0006283242,0.00004830636,0.000320903,0.0036848385,0.0003142481,0.004803017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849775,0.00023059883,0.010718146,0.00006027767,0.00004791824,0.00037102686,0.0029162755,0.00008476116,0.0005936045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95271033,0.019520115,0.009057995,0.0027134803,0.01492005,0.0010779751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.685718,0.17778444,0.08437415,0.015102399,0.03195017,0.0050707622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049408153,0.0006149485,0.0009816516,0.021135617,0.001092943,0.005786783,0.0014639986,0.0007581652,0.0015300333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21283115,0.0003008509,0.001206056,0.033279378,0.0009848155,0.0053129387,0.0028189123,0.00086073583,0.0004148754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027502188,0.00020166022,0.9273944,0.00049615605,0.000625132,0.000058506645,0.0032106482,0.0011454608,0.0007127075,0.0012881089,0.0017520887,0.06284018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015641957,0.0003786784,0.98598677,0.00013323029,0.00008006219,0.00015595672,0.0030664983,0.0053352914,0.0007378289,0.0010493024,0.0030094574,0.000051232277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004712906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006200772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021895438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024027685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26129842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2425105866","doi":"","title":"Influence of cognitive, geographical, and collaborative proximity on knowledge production of Canadian nanotechnology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Cognition; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.3278262243615762,"score_gpt":0.36775583302415793,"score_spread":0.03992960866258172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2425105866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430639,0.0008565972,0.0018817635,0.002509122,0.00003598002,0.00004283872,0.001211724,0.000038011538,0.05036014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962263,0.00032731664,0.0007214402,0.000046203684,0.000014706854,0.0000075602024,0.00016426276,0.000006852073,0.0024852375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976205,0.00036006328,0.000087147775,0.00027542526,0.0013212705,0.00033548434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98214024,0.008232649,0.0029475486,0.0005300409,0.004585296,0.0015642755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028957194,0.00029109156,0.00039488325,0.006816371,0.0035341512,0.0038816894,0.00075415586,0.00049931486,0.0045503043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030488575,0.000106289415,0.00028801494,0.010650571,0.0018887224,0.00118458,0.0020575342,0.0005658601,0.00035305115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038109947,0.00013578085,0.7468743,0.00053593185,0.000240936,0.0009282911,0.019389233,0.011945679,0.0028186159,0.049483288,0.0060983063,0.16116859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032900112,0.00009947119,0.89977086,0.00025426573,0.00027718217,0.00032663406,0.022267127,0.018083183,0.0037131566,0.018507997,0.036524933,0.00014218346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8526756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9064829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021929521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026018832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29638398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2432555349","doi":"","title":"Geographic variation in the number of authors on scientific abstracts.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Presentation (obstetrics); Radiological weapon; Exhibition; Geographic variation; Demography; Variation (astronomy); Library science; Family medicine; Geography; Environmental health; Archaeology; Surgery; Population","score_opus":0.5064724228899031,"score_gpt":0.513383104122977,"score_spread":0.006910681233073923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2432555349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539908,0.02266429,0.0014919132,0.0019137608,0.0002940309,0.000105972016,0.010184895,0.00011498745,0.009239422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892041,0.003756362,0.00072370155,0.00013546809,0.00023088354,0.00010259876,0.004367042,0.000025285934,0.0014545681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99079293,0.0024460822,0.0020355461,0.0014880917,0.002849798,0.00038751817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90880024,0.039206788,0.036835443,0.002419849,0.010394503,0.0023430774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00780165,0.00026268023,0.00057608384,0.010240527,0.00048626537,0.0016275195,0.00058703026,0.0004490215,0.0048798267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04978456,0.00018961236,0.00049613003,0.02017531,0.0005090025,0.0012663003,0.0013142639,0.00028472065,0.0009538811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045788827,0.000046028592,0.94435287,0.0012949025,0.0008095561,0.00034864992,0.0016439446,0.00024735727,0.0015903531,0.00041799765,0.004485936,0.044304527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014682761,0.000045687597,0.9935959,0.000067673194,0.00012591264,0.00032657295,0.0009330546,0.000096458854,0.00026644426,0.00017024076,0.0043441853,0.000013118534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034266638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055040047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99219835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082036585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010580058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041259587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461193309","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.16.00643","title":"Introducing JBJS Open Access","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Mandate; Editorial board; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5767792694335799,"score_gpt":0.5971407920401144,"score_spread":0.020361522606534455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461193309","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008559481,0.008074477,0.010236979,0.22983934,0.5394021,0.0007698531,0.0012653688,0.008357235,0.20119868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012261294,0.017303089,0.016571933,0.1626006,0.35241827,0.0013589732,0.0029253927,0.00817974,0.4263806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642487,0.005058918,0.004288268,0.00332054,0.019654306,0.00342927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83465123,0.027342323,0.00890084,0.015737165,0.064116575,0.04925185],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030123433,0.0014509487,0.001616509,0.0066077607,0.004998861,0.025689714,0.0046794144,0.018705783,0.3780644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17844155,0.0015629743,0.0031765113,0.003051326,0.004925929,0.0129941795,0.012098385,0.022613734,0.24342945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022276103,0.00003700021,0.0001688473,0.0003960727,0.000012748966,0.00020179413,0.00014910118,0.000029668221,0.00012235685,0.005473659,0.9403669,0.05301961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013822919,0.000014976386,0.00013534265,0.00039467742,0.0000059917347,0.00026913354,0.00012790371,0.000035810386,0.000045861274,0.0019817185,0.99695456,0.000020207723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015531073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023887577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041899523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020361843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88711566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462061600","doi":"10.4000/quaderni.984","title":"La perception de l’innovation chez les chercheurs canadiens des sciences dites dures","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nutrition Society; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.6861497238239205,"score_gpt":0.5698617550031948,"score_spread":0.11628796882072567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462061600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805109,0.0023659507,0.0012256829,0.0028203719,0.000046179935,0.000030254367,0.00010140038,0.000013855817,0.012885443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993755,0.0011116229,0.00043570614,0.0002149456,0.000020446596,0.00004728934,0.000048601545,0.000008044874,0.004358279],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900945,0.0039662453,0.0004457947,0.0009882299,0.0032921946,0.0012131368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418306,0.03983606,0.0058849556,0.0015061126,0.007845129,0.003097193],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013240273,0.0003238092,0.00079269736,0.004180513,0.0047024367,0.008023709,0.0006871422,0.0025362992,0.0066747745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04704768,0.00038861454,0.00069507083,0.005737143,0.003939705,0.0050071687,0.0042767623,0.0026753538,0.00077760976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038145378,0.000124165,0.26705083,0.0004730324,0.000119549826,0.00061448844,0.6211612,0.0005678346,0.0034374627,0.018227635,0.0013892691,0.086453065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028955412,0.00033618734,0.42482173,0.0004369838,0.00008858792,0.0006208518,0.49082547,0.0007140555,0.0016237792,0.0065546795,0.073746406,0.00020236963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045526285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053034518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066807363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006964257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09052259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462808935","doi":"10.1017/s148180350000587x","title":"Canadian investigators receive research awards","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; China Academy of Engineering Physics; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Action (physics); Medical education","score_opus":0.8547105251632994,"score_gpt":0.6424567869925976,"score_spread":0.2122537381707018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462808935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075195697,0.014688053,0.00094078155,0.23889816,0.20553836,0.0031188144,0.061170395,0.0015115411,0.4666143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05195652,0.015493457,0.002500484,0.020541653,0.03258494,0.000785432,0.035249356,0.0004780463,0.8404102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596911,0.002021252,0.0024926339,0.0014063418,0.022126535,0.012262115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7885082,0.004763921,0.0034986548,0.004443936,0.13455142,0.064233854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01723189,0.0026084648,0.0040213875,0.014033609,0.008580438,0.0100279795,0.0035078747,0.013645324,0.2638962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07397203,0.001473567,0.0031079503,0.012503275,0.0021550541,0.002688897,0.0072488086,0.0048939623,0.09282798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033224645,0.000056100125,0.0021818816,0.00021646613,0.000048412414,0.00012876764,0.000054859287,0.00005226858,0.00013206023,0.0022908067,0.9732806,0.021225628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078378647,0.000107251064,0.0132468855,0.00037058778,0.00013864067,0.00024544372,0.00034560735,0.0003760071,0.00025912677,0.0013771645,0.9827001,0.000049438284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48612005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7095003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9827681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03769985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19776677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96658105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462819058","doi":"10.1101/062109","title":"A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Skew; Computer science; Transparency (behavior); Protocol (science); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23971129138092004,"score_gpt":0.4459265289678294,"score_spread":0.20621523758690938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462819058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068003107,0.00022315036,0.982235,0.0030804106,0.000602875,0.00044456247,0.00043304294,0.0009362719,0.0052444222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21047924,0.0005378049,0.7761405,0.0013027844,0.002043632,0.002564217,0.0006388544,0.0006193486,0.005673563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713576,0.012401147,0.0021501614,0.0062874067,0.0069027287,0.000900946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8855293,0.06515708,0.009208594,0.020129645,0.017324828,0.002650544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045132592,0.0015871925,0.0020078744,0.013812144,0.0034913684,0.011281519,0.005014929,0.003815833,0.009200794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21394092,0.0013208173,0.002643431,0.009870889,0.00931648,0.011415083,0.0066290665,0.0052004107,0.003799291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012421807,0.00010365652,0.004514164,0.00019883376,0.0000977165,0.00016078279,0.00080335984,0.0062210616,0.0011501521,0.90505743,0.0062414627,0.07532717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011860545,0.000084336934,0.002218275,0.00010369792,0.00003878709,0.00028300798,0.00014860857,0.047196764,0.0013612362,0.9295078,0.01885121,0.000087705404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017140255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007067581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9861879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034850766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004417577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2386868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465898896","doi":"10.13021/g82c7p","title":"Report from the Participation in the Current System Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Incentive; Publishing; Public relations; Perception; Business; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4865056503194264,"score_gpt":0.5105701192337794,"score_spread":0.024064468914352988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465898896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6198587,0.00040620027,0.004051549,0.022652272,0.0047055366,0.004029638,0.07833377,0.00092241185,0.26504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51525784,0.0007699773,0.0040008747,0.004764735,0.002268618,0.0067875814,0.047169294,0.00040825855,0.4185728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99099976,0.002487905,0.00044032812,0.0005962158,0.003792546,0.0016832611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424006,0.012333607,0.0055431044,0.006177355,0.022250973,0.011294427],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009186482,0.00071227254,0.00045690808,0.0038682113,0.0053015477,0.0041443636,0.0013204771,0.0020487157,0.07137061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029857183,0.000378414,0.00070451206,0.0028889559,0.00089754333,0.0018337187,0.004734987,0.0028539926,0.02883538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024618572,0.0048404573,0.30559632,0.00070894056,0.0001729393,0.0013179057,0.027822161,0.0004208501,0.0061012614,0.0055656685,0.48669162,0.15830003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013659471,0.0013773899,0.5767569,0.00020729381,0.00009348937,0.00024847838,0.057950612,0.00050648657,0.0048277765,0.0013616959,0.35639235,0.00014098243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01753627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020270929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016392845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046261973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23875844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468380519","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.347","title":"A Scientometric Analysis of Scholarly Publication in the Fields of Management, Operations, Economics, and Business from Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Scientometrics; Library science; Political science; Bibliometrics; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37069782300633775,"score_gpt":0.46499292305470313,"score_spread":0.09429510004836539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468380519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782429,0.003018686,0.0015861065,0.00055686914,0.00009346768,0.0001928374,0.0051650256,0.00006958525,0.011074493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98764193,0.0025629585,0.002326523,0.000055866774,0.00021063621,0.00016598194,0.006028752,0.000014937547,0.0009923676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952095,0.0005591962,0.0006504227,0.00026009476,0.0030304634,0.00029028818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98655033,0.0040300945,0.0033139084,0.00060888403,0.004954164,0.0005426093],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050119795,0.0005053453,0.00071623205,0.049407102,0.0009607954,0.0022579622,0.0005833694,0.00047377078,0.0014804518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020476505,0.0001533011,0.0011088119,0.06179397,0.00053391495,0.0014074187,0.0011084768,0.0004211345,0.0005962177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018803394,0.00022689057,0.8293106,0.00087300956,0.00039921867,0.00046879705,0.0029572414,0.0017254628,0.0011671948,0.0013173857,0.0050661727,0.15629987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135936425,0.00010819058,0.9864884,0.000081310995,0.0001571732,0.00036187004,0.0020137893,0.0017240696,0.0008195346,0.0003584234,0.007850811,0.000022969667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012173542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009025954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021355515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005336608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026506186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468587249","doi":"10.1177/0306312716650046","title":"Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universiteit Leiden","keywords":"Seniority; Division of labour; Multidisciplinary approach; Attribution; Task (project management); Order (exchange); Discipline; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Social psychology; Management; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.6465280787421486,"score_gpt":0.6314724477536953,"score_spread":0.015055630988453306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468587249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155836,0.009947677,0.021367969,0.0038392842,0.00063109497,0.00026371304,0.005149175,0.00016106747,0.04305651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854659,0.0016308102,0.006168516,0.00010696159,0.00037777968,0.00018236837,0.002056687,0.000042954856,0.0039679077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593958,0.01788818,0.005770299,0.004785325,0.009637653,0.0025227377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68152404,0.21326809,0.06338952,0.021642618,0.013770845,0.006404908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031851195,0.0006159868,0.0009222579,0.022498958,0.0035199698,0.007343104,0.001249168,0.0009163289,0.007229204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18097584,0.00041019986,0.00073104934,0.038542453,0.0038963861,0.007917518,0.007274555,0.0012059347,0.0019550426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039154888,0.00015444688,0.75053716,0.0011245281,0.0003301286,0.00045174296,0.016583834,0.0030562303,0.00085555465,0.046166442,0.006346653,0.17400181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110518915,0.00018089174,0.75239825,0.0010447976,0.00017715628,0.0010734333,0.016377578,0.004290281,0.0024396875,0.13447586,0.08728019,0.0001512855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026508952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039979382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99648005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030793166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035288904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469562255","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22578","title":"How do you write and present research well? 16—Target an audience and promote","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Web of science; Citation; Index (typography); Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3132357927969183,"score_gpt":0.4544128314760489,"score_spread":0.14117703867913056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469562255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027336285,0.016669692,0.0065802396,0.7404349,0.023401227,0.0008440211,0.00069621153,0.0016214055,0.18241611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26857808,0.057088558,0.049158067,0.31757334,0.076552264,0.0031439983,0.0016961414,0.0028362582,0.22337325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974814,0.008389772,0.0017830159,0.0014269195,0.012001953,0.0015843174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87585473,0.02236485,0.016161142,0.0044717384,0.03505315,0.046094395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027383912,0.00074104074,0.00112813,0.0035045524,0.00295727,0.02180978,0.0012709625,0.005266942,0.053299017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13234156,0.0004385499,0.00074125157,0.002463149,0.0029664666,0.013766074,0.007938576,0.003329734,0.07464475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009664263,0.00039947845,0.010557028,0.0010376828,0.000049723316,0.00018150432,0.004663004,0.000059173723,0.001385436,0.0043306444,0.5414197,0.43582007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012086723,0.00035270053,0.018083503,0.0036474613,0.000092042355,0.0009763271,0.014079385,0.00025687422,0.0010170162,0.018371895,0.9428946,0.00010738575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006586092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014464594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027222408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008941693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17830294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470086034","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2015-0050","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.6880226861145621,"score_gpt":0.6003016480631788,"score_spread":0.08772103805138332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470086034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27717134,0.005956341,0.11633803,0.14076829,0.0058474024,0.00064300233,0.0014054197,0.0033849848,0.4484852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8695114,0.001451703,0.041617937,0.013501576,0.0060429336,0.00039165097,0.00064954575,0.0010507049,0.06578252],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.933149,0.02444351,0.004820505,0.005735722,0.02738531,0.0044660303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6023769,0.15619397,0.036444042,0.076241225,0.054665428,0.074078456],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049887013,0.00068078656,0.001469937,0.0123449685,0.0044573676,0.042720392,0.0034582352,0.0066705425,0.047017973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24787478,0.00077397993,0.0016110205,0.016476108,0.005758,0.042157866,0.02512389,0.004704546,0.01192698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008365859,0.0011209921,0.06120128,0.0010249777,0.0004308554,0.0011342816,0.014867914,0.0016661464,0.00792361,0.2570354,0.05789688,0.59486103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042624117,0.00034619553,0.023408517,0.000436838,0.00022196642,0.0018645531,0.011227611,0.0026360597,0.0034394441,0.5960323,0.35961238,0.00034791807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010773332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027732013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99654174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036884327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106731085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2638309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470979841","doi":"10.13021/g8xk5r","title":"Report from the \"What Is Open?\" Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Openness to experience; Computer science; Publishing; Scholarship; World Wide Web; Open data; Point (geometry); Data science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.4594353569643454,"score_gpt":0.4438599889798171,"score_spread":0.015575367984528299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470979841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065142545,0.008109923,0.004132213,0.3817825,0.105373316,0.0023106183,0.030245643,0.00085743755,0.46067408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0328152,0.0078025227,0.0038779718,0.09855307,0.02887369,0.0051812096,0.041017417,0.0016800646,0.7801988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98805004,0.0021469414,0.0005095918,0.0012267366,0.0059925537,0.0020741674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656094,0.00729849,0.0014016174,0.0030814698,0.013488231,0.009120899],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01682497,0.0011447297,0.0007964635,0.0035309922,0.005552844,0.00900092,0.0026710606,0.0077514797,0.17478465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034385562,0.0004086311,0.0014971595,0.0031609838,0.0017016496,0.008304983,0.013125181,0.0065353326,0.083526336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056904926,0.00003727939,0.00028967188,0.0001586422,0.0000035095554,0.000029232257,0.0005578503,0.000020621512,0.00016806497,0.0048950436,0.97905225,0.01473078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010440427,0.000018885476,0.0008777417,0.00024332051,0.0000047223234,0.000016422435,0.0011336054,0.000022890708,0.00025956478,0.0019602107,0.9954412,0.0000109811335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067799417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00657826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99732894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052729137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014255932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58471286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472338899","doi":"10.7748/nr.22.6.8.e1370","title":"Questioning the efficacy of ‘gold’ open access to published articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Computer science; Open science; Gold standard (test); Visibility; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Business; MEDLINE; Political science; Medicine; Advertising; Scopus; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8735189213098467,"score_gpt":0.6974667274501697,"score_spread":0.17605219385967696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472338899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030243548,0.13499369,0.017262114,0.7419729,0.008256164,0.0005940485,0.00029515737,0.00015656148,0.06622581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7247982,0.05253666,0.017098458,0.19225417,0.0088079935,0.0015684757,0.00017372698,0.00031545313,0.0024469555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.32801795,0.49006546,0.043115247,0.01937157,0.113867804,0.005562027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.043215375,0.85128516,0.04313415,0.02612334,0.0325554,0.0036866355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6040744,0.0008014208,0.002917321,0.010923858,0.0061019473,0.027746122,0.008248907,0.017676096,0.0074728066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8178245,0.0016230157,0.0036074677,0.007893564,0.09717311,0.057729665,0.019417705,0.014990994,0.0019402141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087475096,0.00031108083,0.013552433,0.028679978,0.001509789,0.0002117582,0.019751612,0.0009662847,0.00041074053,0.66744876,0.035615377,0.23066752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007388644,0.0010653323,0.017964266,0.087604895,0.0013112712,0.00092373905,0.024520852,0.002081837,0.0016703145,0.67006254,0.1916505,0.0004056401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049443413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039350744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022904765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027782084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4882468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474434229","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010013","title":"Authorship, Patents, Citations, Acknowledgments, Tweets, Reader Counts and the Multifaceted Reward System of Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Reward system; Perception; Social media; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.23261838813011418,"score_gpt":0.4489505553829338,"score_spread":0.21633216725281965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474434229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667594,0.00096568203,0.0041924976,0.0063133426,0.00014835669,0.00009133812,0.003465776,0.00007575512,0.0179879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639624,0.00028291388,0.0013894198,0.00009017343,0.0001061906,0.00004884164,0.00044396857,0.000010799342,0.0012314884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924596,0.004353055,0.00069174275,0.00045632018,0.0017225369,0.00031673102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81244,0.14576326,0.02713294,0.0032465253,0.0093960585,0.0020212254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013758545,0.00015484574,0.00032915207,0.006376322,0.00095533405,0.005153696,0.00042816068,0.000709941,0.0050039724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09729224,0.00015810406,0.00023058057,0.011493849,0.0013379176,0.004076653,0.0018752553,0.00082390924,0.00056794623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047014735,0.00020477962,0.8280982,0.0008644893,0.00024399764,0.00011360783,0.007990558,0.0026863315,0.002525012,0.023737192,0.009154634,0.12391103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003397475,0.000237326,0.92599905,0.00032287525,0.00012852078,0.00013096216,0.010452936,0.010276825,0.00296262,0.029658154,0.01962794,0.0001688111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015728051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029337364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016524256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010291041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072762966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476660944","doi":"10.7202/1036236ar","title":"Le rapport mondial de l’UNESCO sur les sociétés du savoir. État des lieux au Québec, dix ans plus tard","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.37824051360262184,"score_gpt":0.44797636091987086,"score_spread":0.06973584731724902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476660944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094367765,0.0625937,0.005773553,0.20873937,0.0064841257,0.0001606868,0.0035695226,0.00018637933,0.61812496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7088249,0.019427912,0.0037197452,0.012551674,0.0006205159,0.00015420694,0.001040677,0.00011903092,0.25354132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635917,0.0009404947,0.00009049951,0.000392254,0.0015042599,0.000713251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921854,0.0013645501,0.00031212054,0.00039096377,0.0043234536,0.0014236117],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041481005,0.0003923676,0.00039094232,0.0026765678,0.008313285,0.0058070756,0.0006906744,0.0019566072,0.015404246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007229758,0.00025291802,0.00038184682,0.0037018657,0.0044868486,0.0021052454,0.002615395,0.0028106023,0.0009070518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001852506,0.00008249708,0.022191236,0.00049915875,0.00008793652,0.00059392035,0.03360553,0.00088620256,0.0016801028,0.47599444,0.30217335,0.16202039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010448331,0.000030125144,0.02697082,0.00045538504,0.000019927977,0.00006198415,0.0062865885,0.00026055347,0.00030867834,0.00507542,0.96047,0.00005005747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9463048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95979804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99732345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043085277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07217327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31260705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477671467","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch010","title":"Open Access Literature Productivity of Library and Information Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Library science; Bibliometrics; Productivity; Citation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Digital library; Computer science; Business; Economic growth","score_opus":0.21465072662164783,"score_gpt":0.487872062404152,"score_spread":0.2732213357825042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477671467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19121146,0.07392793,0.0046041063,0.025594853,0.0027927884,0.00021547958,0.01796119,0.0011785579,0.68251383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79069984,0.07380197,0.004839073,0.0026023595,0.0035930083,0.00018413516,0.011918647,0.00051782985,0.111843094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865767,0.0010665325,0.0008728642,0.000911933,0.009539402,0.0010325745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725857,0.007168743,0.0050126235,0.0016166455,0.0097764395,0.003839882],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042402158,0.00055127405,0.00080962706,0.022914704,0.002450283,0.016640311,0.0011401257,0.0007657099,0.019268444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021394989,0.00026224632,0.0006649113,0.046612836,0.0016503369,0.0062611024,0.004763193,0.0008546725,0.008837246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015294856,0.00017536507,0.101261176,0.0034579681,0.00020409084,0.00054509984,0.0062710755,0.00029819482,0.0022427225,0.07190344,0.10737049,0.70611745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014915426,0.00008115352,0.1677282,0.0007904053,0.000099421326,0.001157364,0.0076982956,0.0003182499,0.0018265874,0.014194019,0.8060375,0.00005380638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051222416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059924005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053234245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008386765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06445938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479570002","doi":"10.4995/carma2016.2015.3140","title":"Validation of a web mining technique to measure innovation in the Canadian nanotechnology-related community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RiuNet (Politechnical University of Valencia)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Measure (data warehouse); Data science; Value (mathematics); Intellectual property; Order (exchange); Web mining; Business; Knowledge management; Data mining; Computer science; World Wide Web; Web page; Statistics; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.3942128199708444,"score_gpt":0.4459838511364967,"score_spread":0.05177103116565229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479570002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934278,0.0007704009,0.056688573,0.00091163,0.0001376182,0.0033254242,0.011335435,0.0006163137,0.032786798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.861823,0.00038906702,0.12394727,0.00020247459,0.000046170804,0.00261621,0.006501219,0.000102255704,0.0043723737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870568,0.0029522625,0.0009883437,0.0009512045,0.00734349,0.000707879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359383,0.02078885,0.0044913655,0.0036210075,0.033793274,0.0013671725],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017377723,0.0006173957,0.00055435626,0.018862847,0.002816545,0.0026133934,0.0017685184,0.00077420083,0.0019793804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06400729,0.0002555782,0.00084065384,0.019545712,0.00085444574,0.0011529669,0.0016487852,0.0005779471,0.00064965704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003908731,0.00075821875,0.70973396,0.0007673159,0.00042891953,0.0004261621,0.007565489,0.0034623658,0.0098964395,0.004261818,0.005840815,0.25646767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074086034,0.0002972108,0.94280124,0.00022403004,0.00015695655,0.0002514776,0.0054619783,0.021809537,0.0077887424,0.0008613556,0.020184686,0.00008876193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64145887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99404866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059513226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017699236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72130525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480970959","doi":"10.1111/jan.13090","title":"Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Psychology; MEDLINE; Internet privacy; Medicine; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5333119558243802,"score_gpt":0.658492083473948,"score_spread":0.12518012764956787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480970959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120945655,0.03637733,0.010089096,0.7200698,0.041816346,0.0005351943,0.0016560198,0.0013177887,0.0671928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7011372,0.016440136,0.015500337,0.19857383,0.016527042,0.0005033284,0.0010708272,0.00069541513,0.04955192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463535,0.019249726,0.008804754,0.0023379487,0.018478883,0.004775134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73871756,0.087191544,0.067198,0.014558436,0.060945835,0.031388532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036409616,0.0009443856,0.00094249885,0.0030802945,0.0060683805,0.014564513,0.0022655656,0.009901443,0.016874554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1523075,0.0006609182,0.0012238778,0.003775887,0.007752503,0.0076073487,0.0054668575,0.0062635266,0.0067666676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066892017,0.0003112152,0.10760471,0.0055981143,0.0005977315,0.0054367874,0.041690003,0.00023394993,0.002772498,0.044617992,0.6669234,0.12354468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013603922,0.00045596447,0.049318425,0.0040276446,0.0003626659,0.009206785,0.07030308,0.0005633982,0.0019397285,0.021498427,0.84142506,0.00076287554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014250089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00395842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99009854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003084865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005885623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19255477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483147859","doi":"10.7202/1028147ar","title":"L’impact de la mutation de l’informatique documentaire au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.21536238097568214,"score_gpt":0.5753334675136607,"score_spread":0.3599710865379785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483147859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7427168,0.0051560286,0.0040467856,0.018658824,0.00036019174,0.00010292314,0.0065403027,0.00043733048,0.22198081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555055,0.001434269,0.0013671087,0.0006229792,0.000042402313,0.000022738483,0.0013429684,0.00008399447,0.03957811],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957301,0.00058780995,0.00018847005,0.00047897839,0.002275157,0.00073943316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725528,0.004257395,0.0015033612,0.00099911,0.018388448,0.0022989125],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028492631,0.0002499474,0.00044051243,0.00475284,0.0037495736,0.0075520645,0.00086741796,0.0008241617,0.013974693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016737679,0.00023078072,0.0004238272,0.007640214,0.0023832684,0.0021372573,0.0012855167,0.0013397288,0.0015603163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073300255,0.00023127392,0.32780743,0.0009366911,0.00038391372,0.0016863014,0.021869395,0.012892443,0.011411009,0.111516014,0.072760455,0.4377721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051448947,0.00011910977,0.6739145,0.00045635935,0.00014329136,0.00045513065,0.011273786,0.006870653,0.004736588,0.0027574245,0.29908714,0.00013463275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97670573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07108613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070408516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5157684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483616777","doi":"10.15200/winn.147220.00404","title":"Knowledge Monopolies and Global Academic Publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The Winnower","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Publishing; Private equity; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Cash; Political science; Business; Library science; Management; Economics; Finance; Law; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.5500932074787537,"score_gpt":0.5878841795718969,"score_spread":0.037790972093143194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483616777","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136423195,0.0027088732,0.0003870434,0.0021705735,0.00017698285,0.000030924857,0.95473194,0.00035833305,0.02579295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030910555,0.0015022801,0.00070508017,0.00022776521,0.00014189695,0.00009367231,0.95823133,0.00009223676,0.008095237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963313,0.00052157784,0.00044108933,0.00057821954,0.0016094651,0.00051830965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99064577,0.0024564832,0.0028792596,0.0015354975,0.0017335154,0.0007495238],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017505459,0.0006140098,0.00077990216,0.0121318335,0.0009158363,0.0062776497,0.0013057671,0.00092528306,0.02486635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016633866,0.00030079982,0.00060408405,0.03568175,0.0007711999,0.0036739751,0.0023304715,0.001666108,0.014934495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015610887,0.00005349376,0.02809832,0.00087228743,0.00007535402,0.00014359893,0.00036714217,0.0008688175,0.00010223001,0.029191216,0.9178307,0.022240795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054191038,0.000012387399,0.027862776,0.00036368734,0.00002182126,0.00019732026,0.00048583996,0.00055672426,0.00036214048,0.0064202654,0.96363807,0.000024925368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030187383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046442706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030930233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024591568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08318621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485726919","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Student Journal Publishing: Events","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9019478745263979,"score_gpt":0.7077693428820072,"score_spread":0.1941785316443907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485726919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013444944,0.005737152,0.0070930226,0.00979863,0.0032945613,0.0022348077,0.21231864,0.024994778,0.72108334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017201375,0.0053936187,0.015766561,0.0006823275,0.00095240795,0.0005963087,0.061904583,0.0037904389,0.8937124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890924,0.00013834001,0.00014402848,0.00008377792,0.0006180449,0.000106487976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808879,0.002182413,0.0014751328,0.00065249763,0.009763408,0.005038763],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022626799,0.00087790564,0.0005205192,0.011128544,0.0020339787,0.005174519,0.0011380678,0.0009912334,0.2738649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010068363,0.0007636437,0.00029798088,0.013558113,0.0004384174,0.0029216253,0.0013063417,0.00084714266,0.121470034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039269973,0.000027344959,0.0012614853,0.00029966718,0.000002127213,0.000045825822,0.0003121849,0.00005640829,0.00016016609,0.0008154861,0.9338587,0.06312124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017715718,0.000018820338,0.005747425,0.00009509605,0.000004487406,0.000039073184,0.00038608987,0.00009153545,0.00024694658,0.00021290564,0.9931277,0.000012207296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07565067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26818812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003194248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012144738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91616935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486387022","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.032","title":"Does the Level of Evidence of Paper Presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meetings From 2006‐2010 Correlate With the 5‐Year Publication Rate or the Impact Factor of the Publishing Journal?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medicine; MEDLINE; Publishing; Publication bias; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.3021968020369631,"score_gpt":0.4512465441725902,"score_spread":0.1490497421356271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486387022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47088662,0.5018023,0.0030208726,0.010449629,0.0026114741,0.00074798334,0.0055124755,0.000090923764,0.0048777508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140777,0.074076876,0.004276611,0.0014046271,0.002118255,0.0005032233,0.0030443417,0.00005966929,0.00043885052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9186737,0.01629604,0.034778375,0.005067568,0.023938108,0.0012462002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33881924,0.30673888,0.27034873,0.009868644,0.06788624,0.0063382774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08721769,0.00064115174,0.0027754821,0.014730503,0.000728108,0.0077202246,0.002601021,0.0029491812,0.0041206367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43566972,0.00074425124,0.004955518,0.016641863,0.0014838893,0.0062022447,0.0021224327,0.0018811694,0.0010326732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031071545,0.00028995026,0.7779048,0.055793986,0.011912349,0.00029038155,0.0013816978,0.0002485644,0.0007461367,0.00028607022,0.0036539354,0.1443849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005791003,0.0021460734,0.94460565,0.027037565,0.01257832,0.0018971369,0.001948182,0.0005527958,0.00077781087,0.00048712426,0.007240314,0.00014998668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014442715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021311936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022928666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004530526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46125674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489636575","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2094-z","title":"Global neuroscience and mental health research: a bibliometrics case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; University of Toronto","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Mental health; Citation; Public health; Citation analysis; Social network analysis; Psychology; Gerontology; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.8921782491564988,"score_gpt":0.7000762143745934,"score_spread":0.19210203478190535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489636575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79982495,0.007861116,0.010638053,0.045380455,0.00034083117,0.00053899304,0.0028566609,0.00009393381,0.13246498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803761,0.004736382,0.008888817,0.00075067277,0.00030943792,0.0001962178,0.00064231467,0.000038002298,0.004061995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676723,0.007955592,0.0007801154,0.0004553714,0.0030412152,0.0010003659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95586705,0.034136876,0.0033086687,0.001451347,0.003166353,0.0020696502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012249435,0.00046584362,0.0008113041,0.017198458,0.0068495977,0.0077026812,0.0015391009,0.004200983,0.005295009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038093895,0.00025988917,0.00091992086,0.04488532,0.004786523,0.005365879,0.005136581,0.0015116595,0.0005297665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005102363,0.00199227,0.30979604,0.0035522692,0.0003907762,0.031207053,0.109549046,0.004058672,0.001125924,0.2756951,0.04039852,0.22172414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019512752,0.00055759953,0.20184278,0.0032517456,0.000584582,0.026623089,0.42378944,0.010996027,0.0025329476,0.10835903,0.221075,0.00019254336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023182943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034721684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069871773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007997799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06478202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489736214","doi":"10.5202/rei.v9i2.259","title":"The Impact of Citation Timing: A Framework and Examples","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Institutions","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Receipt; Discounting; Computer science; Citation impact; Stochastic dominance; Data science; Citation analysis; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7240501767185308,"score_gpt":0.6039475764778806,"score_spread":0.12010260024065023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489736214","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112309486,0.015928434,0.7649314,0.011543895,0.00070753985,0.0005217127,0.0009854102,0.00052476756,0.092547424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.825633,0.007900725,0.15890177,0.0004001692,0.0008848161,0.0005771566,0.0003881322,0.00019676525,0.0051174755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837891,0.00936988,0.0010134183,0.00112241,0.0038952916,0.0008099013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8575102,0.11859977,0.008615595,0.0048058946,0.008796102,0.0016724542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027921194,0.001193351,0.0016549622,0.015466173,0.0027878017,0.008506728,0.00270904,0.0031017885,0.004382838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1301623,0.0006322089,0.0020641752,0.02242875,0.0063526654,0.011197886,0.0046055242,0.0029695611,0.0006703304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007019802,0.00006563561,0.00597765,0.00021908585,0.00007044683,0.0002979121,0.0007860655,0.028480045,0.00048342397,0.93112296,0.0015822212,0.03084441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002881168,0.00007654168,0.0034534687,0.00012103685,0.00005612179,0.00035088533,0.00036736258,0.07653886,0.0003975007,0.90968704,0.008841188,0.0000811114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076605952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003257877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98453385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004800677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022401283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14766318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493514026","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316414958.007","title":"The Johnson scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.519604913071236,"score_gpt":0.4459325329438537,"score_spread":0.07367238012738231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493514026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024876317,0.0018028665,0.022484155,0.0031937119,0.0011162846,0.00012827366,0.0011610863,0.00055961095,0.96706647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084343545,0.003915994,0.027041467,0.0018135153,0.00070473546,0.00025262844,0.0019139678,0.00076610525,0.879248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975006,0.00053653616,0.00014295403,0.00046859635,0.0009484295,0.00040289672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838114,0.00029550854,0.00006811003,0.00061649847,0.00047564224,0.00016319903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017609022,0.00059976446,0.0008021168,0.0025670389,0.004458917,0.007094544,0.0016674005,0.0019401312,0.16200462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056539266,0.0004267506,0.0007212929,0.0035922779,0.0028720635,0.0073959325,0.0035235977,0.0025730552,0.07314518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017666465,0.000011155667,0.000048072285,0.00003452562,0.0000022416843,0.000009156532,0.00007900605,0.000096231124,0.00007440946,0.92373437,0.043254375,0.03263884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011500376,0.00001415989,0.00012945812,0.00006681885,0.0000064651135,0.00006882639,0.000082095765,0.0003097656,0.00025850802,0.34758273,0.6514545,0.000015086831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004661174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16200462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033351947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035966344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5419594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495498057","doi":"10.1017/s0307472200018125","title":"The e-artexte digital repository: Promoting open access in the Canadian contemporary arts research and publishing community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Art Libraries Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Contemporary art; Open access publishing; Library science; Fine art; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; The Internet; Art history; Performance art; Law","score_opus":0.8316852867079174,"score_gpt":0.5949551926557168,"score_spread":0.23673009405220058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495498057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08598686,0.00942723,0.032171916,0.31417766,0.0017163275,0.0012601181,0.0022540085,0.0022133929,0.55079246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70671797,0.014516122,0.12604587,0.022584628,0.0008715747,0.0006846998,0.002234651,0.0011134414,0.12523113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97856903,0.0042428095,0.0007644486,0.0010064782,0.012346315,0.003070828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309223,0.015923437,0.0028998775,0.005313181,0.02605426,0.018886967],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022197502,0.00035727076,0.00045411394,0.011233661,0.021061981,0.025021553,0.003433935,0.0030671658,0.017297518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711835,0.00047145179,0.000554745,0.018710405,0.010188693,0.019165277,0.015259788,0.0028640765,0.002131154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112987706,0.00026007192,0.012517432,0.00062168436,0.000030164194,0.0005586295,0.021543963,0.0007945282,0.0016428196,0.3697706,0.21602729,0.37611982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006671311,0.000045077413,0.016165968,0.0005342021,0.000033502012,0.00017866537,0.013617887,0.0017341592,0.000832011,0.03573865,0.9308877,0.0001654422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89214087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9405778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99656606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060756244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22473584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44081944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496996309","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22623","title":"How do you write and present research well? 18—Publish and flourish","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"The arts; Rank (graph theory); Library science; Publication; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3578105967964909,"score_gpt":0.45453337414109946,"score_spread":0.09672277734460855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496996309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06176179,0.013216052,0.0068628406,0.64593214,0.029522745,0.00069684756,0.0031505127,0.0019202349,0.23693685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5807515,0.022121655,0.032635227,0.16963342,0.055504013,0.0019353875,0.0034828258,0.0027361396,0.1311999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9517543,0.01355791,0.0058955816,0.0023040182,0.02354696,0.0029411905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68892,0.050750393,0.049685016,0.014456317,0.114825785,0.08136236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03972497,0.000525241,0.0010488124,0.006125518,0.0041056005,0.022116145,0.0011520123,0.0034161278,0.0422891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2329515,0.00041807248,0.0010363079,0.005062918,0.0041429726,0.012419199,0.005675761,0.0030024613,0.05358715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384465,0.0002833557,0.04368793,0.00097427925,0.00014356468,0.00028167744,0.004514081,0.0000846192,0.0008965647,0.007468815,0.51426744,0.42725918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001050367,0.00043757612,0.06413963,0.0023317682,0.00011803097,0.0011170988,0.015105875,0.0003302634,0.0011737436,0.030138403,0.88480073,0.00020186875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094419747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002162994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96027505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030061188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008707288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2100882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498021002","doi":"10.7717/peerj.2264","title":"Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Payment; Library science; Business; Scholarly communication; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Advertising; Finance","score_opus":0.8460974344648315,"score_gpt":0.6682455077459878,"score_spread":0.17785192671884376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498021002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44897667,0.064839505,0.00424029,0.27935028,0.002790508,0.00065230276,0.024608927,0.001092416,0.17344908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90308017,0.036912687,0.006509907,0.0216794,0.0009494396,0.00018854698,0.0064032953,0.00026819305,0.024008377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646123,0.0021057576,0.0024415837,0.0025126627,0.023215171,0.005112543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77904457,0.029780632,0.03139313,0.0051802685,0.10839394,0.046207473],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012541359,0.0005051353,0.0007931409,0.0112409135,0.00873577,0.015739828,0.004300531,0.0021502115,0.011260869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056984264,0.0006688015,0.0011068592,0.031407923,0.004468395,0.005356623,0.004161904,0.002694537,0.0012337128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081710296,0.00018502866,0.3270919,0.0025051539,0.0003644461,0.002720333,0.0074550915,0.0010766018,0.0022781696,0.060095023,0.2240867,0.37132442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008880753,0.00011633853,0.55149907,0.0019889155,0.00020311368,0.0021312486,0.019763216,0.0025308395,0.0012049999,0.0078030583,0.4122043,0.00046604362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.970316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98745865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11397545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21452445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82695365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499478747","doi":"10.11575/prism/29084","title":"Institutional Repositories: Towards the Identification of Critical Success Factors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26274562886254815,"score_gpt":0.43688403868410924,"score_spread":0.1741384098215611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499478747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125264,0.0029803012,0.02167945,0.007777617,0.00008714705,0.0018258265,0.0008465396,0.00019027642,0.052086506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864303,0.00077938626,0.010773424,0.0001514877,0.00003845431,0.00052854384,0.00029556899,0.0000386394,0.00096429844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782616,0.0069426605,0.002570082,0.0013808695,0.008213057,0.0026317323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7420903,0.16394217,0.03704896,0.0044673234,0.042297017,0.010154267],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02705878,0.0017024485,0.0014002149,0.030748345,0.0042120446,0.016244197,0.0018176351,0.0016064881,0.0055120443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115078315,0.000625457,0.001087272,0.030508328,0.0071029593,0.013798765,0.0066853133,0.0021875654,0.0006236819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036691607,0.00049480627,0.7469333,0.0017630245,0.0002746932,0.00054243073,0.028314315,0.0013174275,0.0008142128,0.041405525,0.0037535438,0.17401984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086029475,0.00064676616,0.7036015,0.0018595937,0.0004393899,0.00045339233,0.2137065,0.011049918,0.0018351756,0.04664843,0.019402111,0.0002712572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017735252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016545478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011336744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025844054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14310223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504832958","doi":"10.71781/695","title":"Émergence et développement de l’oncologie au Québec : collaboration, compétition et défis organisationnels, 1900-2005","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5320393847669203,"score_gpt":0.6044381817413811,"score_spread":0.07239879697446083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504832958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650827,0.006951631,0.002219762,0.034237795,0.00020332861,0.00026210296,0.0039551468,0.00007011988,0.08701738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96494573,0.0018569939,0.00086784456,0.0009554588,0.000029512086,0.00007741954,0.00082565175,0.000016762418,0.03042461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983158,0.00028523323,0.00005864274,0.00016991964,0.0005117148,0.00065867475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914123,0.00092318025,0.0009447066,0.00013069602,0.0031358493,0.0034533907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002349831,0.00019548429,0.000217431,0.0014230568,0.0051776986,0.0034192854,0.0008678822,0.00059595413,0.0076888846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005994923,0.00019403585,0.00022813617,0.0032861412,0.0020896571,0.0014999605,0.002143963,0.0015166209,0.00046930456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043024108,0.00031049122,0.58147675,0.00066554826,0.00009380329,0.00071509206,0.08946764,0.0033949888,0.00159124,0.046390664,0.06719793,0.20826559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025466126,0.00013001883,0.8294886,0.0003341694,0.0000271723,0.00009743943,0.04241219,0.0013718556,0.00037848842,0.0010742596,0.124615446,0.000044959197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116454616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14043537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8449413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511054836","doi":"10.1642/auk-16-92.1","title":"Trends, costs, benefits, challenges, and prognoses for supplementary materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Auk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Reliability (semiconductor); Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6499792727979707,"score_gpt":0.5435429268533936,"score_spread":0.10643634594457718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511054836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06749989,0.11382315,0.054549545,0.40742287,0.042069823,0.002423845,0.18292822,0.0074625458,0.121820115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.537197,0.07402632,0.12689018,0.033680078,0.027398068,0.00676257,0.14508267,0.0050246,0.043938488],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9396402,0.030682549,0.008686563,0.0028136463,0.016705843,0.0014712138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38875583,0.43407956,0.055769347,0.029539637,0.08044058,0.011415005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06366984,0.0009932668,0.0013557225,0.017186258,0.0017202827,0.011068198,0.0029230788,0.0031474766,0.15750013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47190213,0.00079823687,0.0027107773,0.027780293,0.0017522698,0.01290201,0.003929481,0.0036408582,0.026445292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017243094,0.00014530668,0.031458654,0.008271036,0.00037922562,0.00056478486,0.00035220085,0.0017482768,0.00040555198,0.036989022,0.42351216,0.4944496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057447475,0.00073391036,0.06354182,0.028933758,0.001334661,0.0040009967,0.0023446816,0.011838304,0.0024984071,0.11828115,0.76545453,0.00046332233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022006845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002897427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005663299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009738422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5268904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511751023","doi":"10.1186/s40064-016-3165-6","title":"Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on autism spectrum disorders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SpringerPlus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Scopus; Citation; Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.47844034927722484,"score_gpt":0.5618977958917807,"score_spread":0.08345744661455584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511751023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6989482,0.13114473,0.0034717913,0.007349372,0.00036436386,0.0003865605,0.08948986,0.0008596979,0.067985475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109212,0.051700976,0.0032790906,0.0002463696,0.00055980193,0.00026649603,0.030460564,0.000118070966,0.0024474429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867229,0.001997002,0.0029142026,0.0012554138,0.0064536813,0.0006568356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92709696,0.030880153,0.020869981,0.0026430145,0.016480587,0.002029274],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032747,0.00069605286,0.0016838915,0.14320654,0.001052339,0.00598647,0.0008056244,0.0007209957,0.0045352615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055535972,0.00025725723,0.0014355272,0.193572,0.0011717717,0.0035842375,0.0031272126,0.00042890784,0.001055105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035838792,0.00008534057,0.7185768,0.01740992,0.001967089,0.0008784581,0.0052128634,0.0020327088,0.0023522975,0.009838545,0.022831101,0.2184565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029064322,0.00011626527,0.9100746,0.0030757224,0.0010100045,0.0018690404,0.0050298553,0.0017880364,0.0008763563,0.0040041944,0.072043315,0.00008349958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054628327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057608797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85679346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027740914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00486909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04248178},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2512942831","doi":"10.4000/communication.6872","title":"Declan FAHY (2015), The New Celebrity Scientists. Out of the Lab and into the Limelight","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Limelight; Humanities; Philosophy; Portrait; Art history; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.44142739647680124,"score_gpt":0.5438260492700419,"score_spread":0.10239865279324062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512942831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008319935,0.08049576,0.00079205225,0.88303393,0.024345083,0.00001209661,0.000180292,0.000057376543,0.0102513945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07504766,0.14896321,0.0043985373,0.49358115,0.038538873,0.00015836053,0.000623668,0.00034221736,0.23834635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972519,0.0009002063,0.00014340853,0.0004632992,0.0010405,0.000200714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99041885,0.0041056,0.00089927064,0.0003470957,0.0020972304,0.0021318858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055156914,0.00058278255,0.0004873215,0.0014770158,0.006385927,0.012705374,0.0008463145,0.0045610685,0.010883324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021109529,0.0004065696,0.00036822175,0.0016997649,0.003863868,0.009281503,0.0027209194,0.010944826,0.0061981897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001485503,0.000007672616,0.000549724,0.00006186468,0.000006406097,0.000027141437,0.0008988473,0.000011730257,0.00007386073,0.010476094,0.9677751,0.020096686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006287807,0.0000072660046,0.0012920058,0.00021248883,0.000005771089,0.000087595574,0.0015878149,0.000027735567,0.00016341209,0.0075786076,0.9890126,0.000018373572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011382574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029885836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037417375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009235438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036408365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513105786","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2016-205893","title":"Analysis of h-index and other bibliometric markers of productivity and repercussion of a selected sample of worldwide emergency medicine researchers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Sample (material); Index (typography); Productivity; Emergency medicine; Family medicine; World Wide Web; Chromatography","score_opus":0.42254164564654606,"score_gpt":0.5466975217501402,"score_spread":0.12415587610359413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513105786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941855,0.0010228864,0.00062194566,0.00014121868,0.000013393306,0.00004680764,0.0020472696,0.000034586046,0.0018863732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972971,0.00023399238,0.00045126016,0.000019657275,0.00006110963,0.000058214544,0.001506818,0.000008791916,0.00036303577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556386,0.001094731,0.0009520518,0.0006850247,0.0013171397,0.0003871992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551852,0.015527363,0.01894342,0.0024337398,0.006329393,0.0015808189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072717806,0.00039126552,0.00080199615,0.023774616,0.0006061182,0.0017389049,0.00070455234,0.0004538266,0.0027174565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03684223,0.00015959235,0.0007807669,0.022053711,0.00053081353,0.0015956074,0.0016805313,0.00027116368,0.0007052063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009123477,0.000030537412,0.9900704,0.00008951127,0.000187003,0.000090347196,0.0003320613,0.00016554013,0.00033597922,0.00007915902,0.00023687643,0.008291444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039396627,0.00005186905,0.99865305,0.000009652575,0.00003059308,0.00010419195,0.00035574514,0.00032019702,0.00012740336,0.00006436323,0.00027377484,0.0000051844295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022867771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019513152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99272823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073122734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010758231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038457334},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2513984212","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/20/3/25","title":"Debating the future of physics publishing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Nothing; Computer science; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Physics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4903740155259975,"score_gpt":0.5412593030272596,"score_spread":0.05088528750126203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513984212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009202731,0.011925568,0.00063130364,0.9512854,0.010905812,0.0000040441364,0.00002920455,0.000028744262,0.02426969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1682087,0.032650974,0.0025921082,0.65878665,0.08937302,0.00007860317,0.00012292854,0.00033353883,0.04785338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95686686,0.011567912,0.0019491664,0.0036433479,0.022853617,0.0031189949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86046195,0.07939706,0.0080883,0.008619393,0.026958222,0.016474986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048504725,0.00041649293,0.0009995336,0.0025177093,0.01033489,0.032922376,0.0025166867,0.023426926,0.01499079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14443888,0.000532328,0.0008405241,0.0036653695,0.03536273,0.054734018,0.009519064,0.030614482,0.004464572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024787561,0.000011780971,0.00028808217,0.00010962056,0.000012605984,0.00005866676,0.0012793466,0.000059338327,0.000052237054,0.67331034,0.30456066,0.020232406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018879982,0.00001686571,0.0004784724,0.00035528812,0.0000075060434,0.000102202335,0.001287352,0.00014179364,0.00011503911,0.24956638,0.74788105,0.000029124718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006353439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081332475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009878274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016645376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25652057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514251649","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0161281","title":"The Impact of a Researcher’s Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Centrality; Structural holes; Position (finance); Social network analysis; Network analysis; Network science; Association (psychology); Bridging (networking); Position paper; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Complex network; Psychology; Social science; Business; Engineering; Social capital; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7800467983055897,"score_gpt":0.6093102400245051,"score_spread":0.17073655828108458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514251649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99399793,0.00016901828,0.0015212329,0.0002889876,0.000008256809,0.000053891814,0.00021366728,0.0000117496165,0.003735233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912363,0.00005252628,0.0004852032,0.000010490047,0.000014208541,0.00003515306,0.00010296305,0.000003473015,0.00017241652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97747326,0.01125853,0.0019495852,0.0014313839,0.0062615937,0.0016255786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6510586,0.27897483,0.03576966,0.008041329,0.019351931,0.0068036257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02306179,0.0003787482,0.0005264956,0.007379627,0.0017828047,0.0027321035,0.0010492157,0.0009670546,0.0034673838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13988909,0.00019896464,0.0006922127,0.013498835,0.0028454144,0.0041398928,0.0030694152,0.0012337203,0.0005315755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016522614,0.00021202653,0.9829863,0.00008704589,0.00020073618,0.00012792683,0.002451356,0.0010971258,0.0002679556,0.0014344257,0.00016457649,0.010805466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003088228,0.0006276037,0.97556835,0.00008248519,0.00021793698,0.0002475581,0.008592483,0.009975547,0.0009842573,0.0024437867,0.0011989988,0.0000300406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036528374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99262035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020858978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026219583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12196392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518333632","doi":"10.5539/jas.v8n10p73","title":"Few Journal Article Organizational Structure Characteristics Affect Article Citation Rate: A Look at Agricultural Economics Articles Using Regression Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Salary; Tobit model; Organizational structure; Variables; Regression analysis; Psychology; Social science; Econometrics; Economics; Management; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.16739799530514615,"score_gpt":0.43434398754183107,"score_spread":0.2669459922366849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518333632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919614,0.0009909642,0.0016236389,0.00043196217,0.0000236874,0.000028782004,0.0005464285,0.00005293619,0.004340252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966799,0.00045121022,0.0011067304,0.000060035607,0.00005243035,0.000017794928,0.00076710916,0.0000432332,0.00082153693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381316,0.0024228701,0.0009701892,0.00061238604,0.0018415558,0.0003399268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85540944,0.08989887,0.03301171,0.006516004,0.01334104,0.0018229483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008222881,0.00029918388,0.0004997017,0.009039018,0.00048373168,0.0023295826,0.00065852824,0.0005523191,0.002510902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050305627,0.00026417262,0.0018074156,0.010652787,0.00052312255,0.0018289629,0.0007129466,0.0007192882,0.0010371335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005318679,0.00008124353,0.9796648,0.000097832664,0.00041936475,0.000058883197,0.00044306568,0.00044243588,0.00063303404,0.00022982447,0.0003695132,0.017506825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038027779,0.00010304221,0.9949066,0.000049295046,0.00017508406,0.0000709203,0.00078835257,0.0016766902,0.0007196577,0.00020420073,0.0012860749,0.00001625671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046840515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008122768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068932574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011102511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04348725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521761739","doi":"10.1021/cen-v080n042.p020","title":"STOCKS HIT HARD IN THIRD QUARTER","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical & Engineering News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social media; Icon; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.37140425260890114,"score_gpt":0.45591150319218277,"score_spread":0.08450725058328162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521761739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7322759,0.009554376,0.0009563135,0.038233634,0.005700735,0.00010606697,0.020693174,0.0012741062,0.1912057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87763697,0.004166964,0.00049328175,0.017313495,0.0019803245,0.000060385286,0.013247814,0.00024802677,0.084852666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873847,0.00003281369,0.00010444431,0.0001291155,0.000657974,0.00033730216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684274,0.00016169414,0.00082118437,0.00018548494,0.001077125,0.0009118237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116271,0.00056355796,0.0008938718,0.0037160607,0.002275311,0.009011435,0.00049431453,0.0017814441,0.016675765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046882685,0.00029801897,0.0006217992,0.00300602,0.00067759707,0.0022596924,0.0017937475,0.0022150942,0.0072208275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093064527,0.00018943402,0.27665204,0.00023820133,0.00017368779,0.001301238,0.0014787866,0.00039542242,0.0030783664,0.017612945,0.4929995,0.20494974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008597194,0.00035253534,0.566335,0.00022328747,0.00010629377,0.0014437932,0.0039512655,0.0008074537,0.0077846446,0.006446543,0.41234785,0.00011528457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023494225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021570861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023494225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041767564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019903574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055786014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522670696","doi":"10.29173/cais282","title":"A Transactional Matrix Analysis of National Attendance On International Scientific Meetings","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Transactional leadership; Feature (linguistics); Information flow; Computer science; Data science; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.19083561142939068,"score_gpt":0.44058181757284853,"score_spread":0.24974620614345786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522670696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955968,0.00034224844,0.030823044,0.0007502751,0.00005891817,0.000093846706,0.002744411,0.00017957504,0.009039691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785156,0.00012463685,0.008432648,0.000015981366,0.000028000171,0.00005246909,0.0013182436,0.000016431186,0.002160085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998207,0.0006520495,0.00016266655,0.00031168162,0.00048351305,0.0001831094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883427,0.0068494612,0.0015118093,0.0008383544,0.0018527033,0.00060489186],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022589874,0.00022422771,0.00042087885,0.004676047,0.00064808194,0.0025743246,0.00056055473,0.0003879988,0.00916304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015823647,0.0001448697,0.00046948664,0.007371025,0.00042818132,0.0019057828,0.0007379776,0.0006996135,0.0013017842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012836709,0.0005760439,0.64079523,0.000429453,0.00057540264,0.0007911975,0.008266193,0.018366702,0.008862357,0.039504014,0.0068444232,0.2737053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046252608,0.00088679156,0.6639151,0.000108221626,0.00025927072,0.0008041343,0.014467081,0.27331787,0.0030812318,0.025764823,0.017192425,0.00015678797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010716846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0117941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99532396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008776046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092857855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030653477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524030966","doi":"","title":"Individual researchers’ research productivity: a comparative analysis of counting methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Field (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Social science; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Economic growth; Cartography","score_opus":0.9462454699951968,"score_gpt":0.765133054393088,"score_spread":0.18111241560210878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524030966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63498384,0.042436983,0.28362456,0.0019445533,0.000924866,0.0048809927,0.0039885854,0.0006527744,0.026562937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599372,0.0059528304,0.12591211,0.0003036259,0.00040526118,0.0043870467,0.0017607453,0.00023568333,0.0011056431],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.49351835,0.39679033,0.024095,0.014953868,0.067512445,0.0031299586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11146572,0.7939826,0.04292981,0.030416679,0.020097597,0.0011075881],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28987837,0.0017234718,0.004179909,0.03707595,0.002073121,0.008463699,0.004452326,0.0024922783,0.005125207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6352234,0.00079722475,0.006327375,0.04991781,0.0052448837,0.011031853,0.0063591218,0.0015453987,0.0008245328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006420263,0.00067101384,0.40406182,0.013867343,0.033848047,0.00037958083,0.02052606,0.007462339,0.0012049997,0.040496286,0.004660552,0.46640182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013112887,0.0066294693,0.7011886,0.010161721,0.01953323,0.002216367,0.03086124,0.059835766,0.004906388,0.11808561,0.04414638,0.0011238527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014369101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012309273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96292406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00428045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003948485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87570643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524620595","doi":"10.18438/b8js8p","title":"Measuring Scholarly Productivity of Long Island Educational Institutions: Using Web of Science and Scopus as a Tool","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Web of science; Productivity; Higher education; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; MEDLINE; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.39565448736962916,"score_gpt":0.48952699471622574,"score_spread":0.09387250734659658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524620595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94142187,0.00773208,0.0074601816,0.002356184,0.0001785428,0.00039262432,0.012265171,0.0002463928,0.027947024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719598,0.004252864,0.0138009405,0.00016876947,0.00012292441,0.0002797113,0.007483264,0.000052987543,0.0018787105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99096686,0.002032812,0.0022916512,0.0005790622,0.0035326679,0.0005969862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91211313,0.024520105,0.027667675,0.0035308562,0.028635662,0.0035325757],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012623029,0.00049515587,0.0006714989,0.04400569,0.001105048,0.007280784,0.0012795853,0.00046487967,0.0021685057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058243148,0.00021572839,0.00071189797,0.05489742,0.0006460814,0.005231521,0.0035792498,0.0005618321,0.0007218778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008472889,0.00010969534,0.87374735,0.0011945232,0.00050095876,0.0003265895,0.0022405107,0.00082589337,0.00067440246,0.00064828916,0.0033689442,0.11627805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009934098,0.00013237003,0.96903497,0.0009586773,0.00021548425,0.00022137808,0.012622468,0.0031330357,0.0010291027,0.0008165373,0.011770546,0.000055567278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025037676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04729782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002434998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052420483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06675774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524647697","doi":"10.29173/cais283","title":"A Concise Review On The Role Of Author Self-Citations In Information Science, Bibliometrics And Science Policy","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2356972037868541,"score_gpt":0.46773803466837877,"score_spread":0.23204083088152466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524647697","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000095313924,0.9979942,0.00020381631,0.00081204926,0.00033176076,0.0000050955796,0.00001634568,0.0000032065232,0.0005381508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013811634,0.997355,0.00028389864,0.00028357582,0.0004434324,0.00001367623,0.000023449913,0.000002098366,0.00021373095],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962914,0.0014358493,0.0006526165,0.0002842796,0.0011873995,0.00014840081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789256,0.015283732,0.0020644052,0.00032900498,0.0031728877,0.0002244658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005732276,0.0009918989,0.0020710346,0.013229449,0.00076909474,0.003412017,0.0010537043,0.0022990885,0.0027125385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018975178,0.0005914304,0.00091151526,0.022683932,0.0012531846,0.003974676,0.0011155449,0.0016364978,0.0011012004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097493175,0.000055734818,0.0009537741,0.112546615,0.0004906847,0.00022237316,0.00058665744,0.0007681293,0.0007687185,0.022946974,0.057354957,0.8032079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022315176,0.00011819779,0.0053752353,0.07088186,0.0008470068,0.00076785136,0.0004205196,0.0003381197,0.0005658847,0.012359875,0.90823627,0.00006691569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004713356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010275273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002869911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009568663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030315578},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2525288835","doi":"10.3917/rfs.573.0407","title":"Practices and Rhetoric of the Internationalization of Science","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Française de Sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.571424494086081,"score_gpt":0.5687829082360797,"score_spread":0.0026415858500012934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525288835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07135188,0.024085559,0.022504212,0.32753554,0.0030528607,0.000061009363,0.000113128015,0.00013463707,0.55116117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97372234,0.0034727345,0.0038828298,0.0095627615,0.001615722,0.00008117168,0.0000395152,0.00014652277,0.007476539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95663196,0.028422663,0.0019190883,0.003703176,0.0070830365,0.0022401428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8346233,0.14064752,0.0077925827,0.007204871,0.007764138,0.001967682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05586516,0.00067854516,0.00076022063,0.012266738,0.014341936,0.023580188,0.002444612,0.011862764,0.004194208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10165921,0.0008504211,0.0006183697,0.010800731,0.061317794,0.019423893,0.008885979,0.018166624,0.00042059226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012650784,0.0000059983086,0.00024552233,0.00004359011,0.0000057509346,0.00004032249,0.023899892,0.000049295944,0.00007307095,0.96871734,0.0029372806,0.0039692204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040445022,0.000035027493,0.0017884588,0.0012233179,0.000034207893,0.00022169157,0.029003803,0.00081012567,0.00090677093,0.6770788,0.28880715,0.00005020946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058477563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053828773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98773324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01585509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007469158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2954467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525623129","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0162709","title":"How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8995300042247711,"score_gpt":0.5926924146211023,"score_spread":0.3068375896036688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525623129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92536175,0.0313702,0.0047925385,0.01542601,0.00023657625,0.00005048223,0.0014796024,0.000076646866,0.02120621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946207,0.0031871076,0.00055411574,0.00039044605,0.0002884608,0.0000134757,0.00025456454,0.00001967446,0.00067143387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98605216,0.005186012,0.0014182265,0.0024902509,0.003991544,0.0008618837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59130985,0.3345319,0.04847043,0.009521924,0.0073392955,0.008826608],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023162149,0.00040684934,0.0011267322,0.007161229,0.0013127889,0.0051679835,0.0011379892,0.0012751155,0.0065352675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15516399,0.00028323993,0.0011475306,0.015699986,0.0045443834,0.006420585,0.0037288016,0.0021646495,0.0014766193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032889165,0.00011963135,0.9253093,0.00042889628,0.0009916667,0.00029088292,0.0029640985,0.0019581101,0.00030145008,0.0070625525,0.0017388548,0.05850564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041569296,0.00018414635,0.9685222,0.00032052508,0.0004351287,0.00033433147,0.0024286408,0.0016159901,0.00043718098,0.018872265,0.00674764,0.00006042371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035210738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003513209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014332093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013787419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12249458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526820601","doi":"10.5860/crl.78.6.824","title":"Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Perception; Public relations; Open access publishing; Open science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.794470165071975,"score_gpt":0.6667468592542378,"score_spread":0.12772330581773716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526820601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940837,0.00020639949,0.00028926294,0.0014299602,0.000016203365,0.000013130884,0.000017165406,0.000004936047,0.003939209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846447,0.00025965334,0.00029704292,0.00026881057,0.00002258722,0.00000918217,0.000022533455,0.0000031283514,0.0006525789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106115,0.004886004,0.00073987065,0.00034789945,0.0023642783,0.0006008197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379339,0.031382944,0.015542096,0.0012580185,0.00638729,0.0074957674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013736796,0.00020258228,0.0003419611,0.00237735,0.0036237577,0.00971015,0.0006005489,0.0017855172,0.002107701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05769965,0.00029921043,0.00046162875,0.0017017195,0.0024038684,0.005583345,0.0029284842,0.001701192,0.00041392865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021286063,0.0004455079,0.6872023,0.00015004049,0.00010396024,0.00080314645,0.26936594,0.0003432611,0.001070725,0.0047254185,0.0017605071,0.03381644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046933128,0.00044666458,0.19378148,0.0002640934,0.00008844655,0.0016280039,0.7716065,0.002133453,0.00090067904,0.008458947,0.020467985,0.0001767677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041127545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053246287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021493922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020169762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07264799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527210626","doi":"","title":"Improving addiction patients’ quality of life through exercise","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation impact; Medicine; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7552906579809577,"score_gpt":0.6134657219853138,"score_spread":0.14182493599564394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527210626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89902526,0.033414986,0.0024204932,0.018147169,0.00048170934,0.00024507166,0.0021464727,0.00012634229,0.043992452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98225754,0.010587564,0.0023195604,0.0013484231,0.00019770951,0.000093160525,0.0006119827,0.000016137896,0.0025679625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869835,0.0006584597,0.00014083955,0.000103220205,0.00022547947,0.00017357065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966067,0.001469584,0.00087975344,0.00016600742,0.0003903651,0.0004875675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023774868,0.000178298,0.0006782312,0.0010825183,0.00050217175,0.002002019,0.00037261407,0.00057830475,0.008166462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113544585,0.00012602421,0.00097383227,0.001669758,0.00036328778,0.0011563887,0.00094825757,0.001158185,0.00062785164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083590474,0.0022646377,0.4286728,0.0026735207,0.0011543013,0.0002392832,0.0012549134,0.00066546776,0.0010933365,0.0021933864,0.008042349,0.5509102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019166121,0.0012415749,0.96600795,0.0023661088,0.0005005349,0.00034306478,0.0011685573,0.0009995596,0.0004955012,0.0041192807,0.022514455,0.000051686453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036794718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008935982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008166462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010170765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010546156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02731955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527456359","doi":"10.1111/jan.13169","title":"Countries publishing in <i>JAN</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Impact factor; Prestige; Library science; Citation; Political science; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.24110062339281096,"score_gpt":0.5713645331885939,"score_spread":0.33026390979578296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527456359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029229678,0.053730708,0.001725116,0.08267068,0.20451066,0.0006425425,0.010412522,0.0024246154,0.6146535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23553677,0.06551897,0.012850297,0.084161006,0.06319745,0.0012411826,0.013295249,0.005281338,0.51891774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888399,0.0038364267,0.0020816447,0.00097499345,0.0027459455,0.0015210276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93389416,0.012756756,0.016238298,0.0069817537,0.017933337,0.012195768],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009900798,0.001299112,0.0013686299,0.011096753,0.005681547,0.028508142,0.0015485635,0.0027793956,0.123871185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04652528,0.0007867336,0.0010394502,0.017923286,0.0032023417,0.00875298,0.0070745186,0.0022944992,0.0865601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014911222,0.000044012722,0.0089711305,0.0023414916,0.00008990316,0.0009956522,0.0044453456,0.00006765,0.0010420831,0.014470154,0.8857387,0.0816448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009048452,0.000036393343,0.0066087227,0.001121034,0.00001767355,0.00059920625,0.004659359,0.00003197094,0.00040541156,0.00096904923,0.98550355,0.000038698272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019046474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036357725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002348679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005221951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4143904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528776092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.1","title":"Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Scholars' Language Choices in International Scholarly Publishing: A Ten-Year Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Citation index; Social science; Humanities; Sociology; Citation; Linguistics; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.4310339561278515,"score_gpt":0.504655204141219,"score_spread":0.0736212480133675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528776092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991385,0.00012084986,0.000017806564,0.00006018904,0.0000019899628,0.00000770926,0.00016599165,9.795244e-7,0.00048590917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987753,0.00025969208,0.000064298896,0.0000514908,0.000007764923,0.000020684967,0.00034458612,0.0000013788932,0.0004747979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986841,0.00024478787,0.0002898396,0.0001497433,0.0004336629,0.00019771548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175996,0.0017896293,0.0035830822,0.00034686964,0.0011876939,0.0013327748],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029358435,0.00015606583,0.00040433827,0.0050189346,0.0011286492,0.0014658936,0.00043744573,0.00039848118,0.001929415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006809305,0.00018068474,0.00033223792,0.008628864,0.00066972984,0.0018234979,0.001183547,0.0004561428,0.00038936696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022484643,0.00004175255,0.9873904,0.000031056697,0.000018305302,0.00009665467,0.007106661,0.000022018967,0.0001522343,0.00010214982,0.00014508769,0.0048711533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023224895,0.000064269414,0.9863516,0.00001578951,0.000013163109,0.0001196001,0.012272416,0.00011605158,0.00009680192,0.0000622268,0.0008772168,0.000008575959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010964835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019199314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000999187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014286287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021802008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528867665","doi":"10.3138/9781442678897","title":"Public Science, Private Interests: Culture and Commerce in Canada's Networks of Centres of Excellence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Public administration; Political science; Business; Public relations; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17270837357685973,"score_gpt":0.3588150077710156,"score_spread":0.18610663419415588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528867665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07170301,0.01805764,0.0026755645,0.044339273,0.0003313401,0.000066922104,0.00044996117,0.00008631142,0.86229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634356,0.009315832,0.0023332697,0.0015882046,0.00009563677,0.0000447061,0.00014532263,0.00005892635,0.122982524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985794,0.00023578046,0.00003109586,0.00009729906,0.00062598137,0.00043049912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972675,0.0008061769,0.00015945498,0.00008647288,0.00088665384,0.0007938259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012480684,0.00033983335,0.00031865688,0.0030947074,0.012354508,0.017497608,0.0010927697,0.0016876517,0.00785172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050150836,0.00036406613,0.00030159153,0.01073816,0.01170905,0.0047635795,0.0026328946,0.0019127412,0.00046530046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019743215,0.000012427297,0.005731951,0.0000552947,0.000013131288,0.00014070125,0.010747958,0.00074399455,0.00009711827,0.89091265,0.048460256,0.04306475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026792492,0.000016368615,0.037201427,0.0005660021,0.000052590694,0.00026555828,0.04729285,0.0020832482,0.0003786566,0.27061448,0.6414278,0.00007423723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99135476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99875194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102326065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.132289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74243104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529285477","doi":"10.29173/cais913","title":"Acknowledgment Research Genealogy for Today’s Quantified Academia","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Library science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.5034044582700364,"score_gpt":0.5181975583030186,"score_spread":0.014793100032982176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529285477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32868657,0.022729266,0.25979504,0.06168916,0.001319065,0.00037089878,0.0075432835,0.0015940882,0.31627256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145349,0.00526494,0.043352332,0.0014942233,0.00027421853,0.00034503252,0.0016622228,0.00027435715,0.032797758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995131,0.0018058845,0.00028278,0.0014815313,0.0010186727,0.0002801639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774194,0.01065261,0.0032390342,0.004024686,0.0036067558,0.0010574572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005231841,0.00032996517,0.00060810894,0.009401339,0.0036261172,0.006978158,0.001569209,0.0012938633,0.023288473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026327115,0.00036368144,0.0005720581,0.010201478,0.0065455786,0.010102678,0.0033832157,0.0019318948,0.0019800747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045970373,0.00003231469,0.023335276,0.00022759491,0.00004002566,0.00017228856,0.0045489864,0.003036207,0.00034626952,0.864707,0.009247002,0.09426111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001974718,0.000072972,0.02282675,0.0004910655,0.00005755481,0.0007312205,0.007699284,0.010030924,0.00043821003,0.6798886,0.27764884,0.00009476668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01315509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015785612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99476814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006365305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042286934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07790768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531842628","doi":"10.1186/s41073-016-0022-7","title":"Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of British Columbia; Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Community; Publishing; Functional ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Rhetorical question; Biology; Habitat; Political science; Ecosystem; Law","score_opus":0.9221730707033521,"score_gpt":0.7096993867356763,"score_spread":0.21247368396767574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531842628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579723,0.004678375,0.006267096,0.017302783,0.00033008834,0.0005837201,0.002487904,0.0001045502,0.010273287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421906,0.0003884066,0.0021855384,0.001214693,0.00026261335,0.0004235684,0.0007407153,0.00005376006,0.00051167025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.58019954,0.20350361,0.07738937,0.038585193,0.092608444,0.0077139097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06993673,0.6545218,0.1898585,0.032513555,0.045878183,0.0072913007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32240108,0.0004949357,0.0017793407,0.011475573,0.003436044,0.0062244684,0.005472206,0.0031552117,0.004203854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7331475,0.0007731104,0.002829065,0.019541882,0.0074636843,0.013181803,0.0075897654,0.0035489933,0.0013188312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011409824,0.0002622175,0.93367356,0.0016672751,0.0017245382,0.0002526461,0.015727906,0.0006179632,0.00048364713,0.0023861919,0.0036785128,0.03838441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015373871,0.0010041211,0.9749051,0.0005706627,0.0004980426,0.00058344036,0.008033008,0.0019269955,0.00082615745,0.0016858241,0.009722611,0.000090336966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008636365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007858859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67759895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004754281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059859366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83560014},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2531929339","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of National Cancer Institute of Canada-Supported Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Regional science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8147265308711052,"score_gpt":0.6424995894648025,"score_spread":0.1722269414063028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531929339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40343112,0.030385721,0.0029755312,0.0062261084,0.0010122032,0.0011968102,0.38765016,0.0011855253,0.16593675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7831907,0.016090939,0.0070736273,0.0005424679,0.00044326868,0.00078710256,0.16469818,0.00020217609,0.02697149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95146143,0.0030633437,0.0038273835,0.0017709376,0.03650996,0.0033669476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8402129,0.016198177,0.01143881,0.0040150136,0.12195927,0.0061758533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01254573,0.00073982106,0.0021238178,0.15477997,0.0050117346,0.007178754,0.0029729782,0.0006963501,0.006298999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09327587,0.0003253285,0.0013761983,0.26676604,0.0011456296,0.0015388868,0.0029601608,0.0009913453,0.0019086346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083823287,0.0003573182,0.5415139,0.0082255285,0.002367319,0.00049552426,0.0051357998,0.0027459734,0.0026657283,0.01708972,0.18169987,0.2368651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046398265,0.00007060776,0.8805904,0.0006359853,0.00087299984,0.00020996883,0.0034623905,0.0018945173,0.001735057,0.0010289465,0.10936845,0.00008425704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91031677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93925864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05693419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17844005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41308844},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2531933588","doi":"10.5830/cvja-2015-082","title":"Patterns of international collaboration in cardiovascular research in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cardiovascular journal of South Africa/Cardiovascular journal of Southern Africa","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.3708793697513478,"score_gpt":0.47177820280118843,"score_spread":0.10089883304984065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531933588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031668884,0.994138,0.000113836046,0.0009794403,0.00008443674,0.000026055253,0.00010732537,0.0000033809174,0.001380647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026400147,0.9727217,0.0003884594,0.00015224276,0.00009723393,0.000033000568,0.00009440932,0.0000018180057,0.00011093805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991791,0.003360009,0.001810471,0.0007293032,0.0019470195,0.0003621938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97687316,0.014437316,0.0051806453,0.0003766037,0.0026154546,0.0005168902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009139428,0.0005625118,0.0014191908,0.02037885,0.00078164163,0.0034121692,0.0007897783,0.000962429,0.002132904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026034238,0.0003450515,0.001287888,0.037032202,0.00096724805,0.0025344505,0.0019004714,0.0007469538,0.00031227712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011262954,0.00005790776,0.02075462,0.09846614,0.0019991917,0.0003162535,0.0022613124,0.0003821967,0.00034064346,0.0037522584,0.0045996103,0.86695725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015633224,0.0003081298,0.23451927,0.2760461,0.008022567,0.004507374,0.011186941,0.0005322055,0.0011428926,0.0077402485,0.45567763,0.00016026608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057491483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012186244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022308996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00790452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04833454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537154768","doi":"10.7202/1036241ar","title":"Aperçu de la pratique de la science ouverte dans les universités francophones au Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.1200168256215672,"score_gpt":0.43332597556829794,"score_spread":0.31330914994673076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537154768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88585514,0.0083220955,0.00089877134,0.030814096,0.00019963544,0.00005847638,0.0011264884,0.000043435695,0.07268199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714779,0.0023228554,0.00023470682,0.00082390825,0.000022384296,0.000018663812,0.00014446139,0.000011190659,0.024943868],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751437,0.0005250916,0.000087428096,0.0002629223,0.000727466,0.00088275084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989493,0.0021326796,0.0010092393,0.00024869325,0.0045394166,0.0025769481],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028914735,0.00023258392,0.00032208013,0.0026101486,0.011312784,0.0052390406,0.00059523,0.0011372707,0.008954824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005494926,0.0001821671,0.00020748429,0.006665332,0.0037458513,0.0017016568,0.0018788261,0.001429158,0.0005416669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027609954,0.00011762128,0.33566183,0.0008635385,0.00008848006,0.0014850422,0.35040352,0.000940072,0.0032437972,0.061416626,0.06185826,0.18364504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011143058,0.00004913754,0.5646019,0.0005889295,0.000039105762,0.00017172832,0.18449785,0.000642233,0.00054696394,0.0011595981,0.24760248,0.00008904748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9793199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99184096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06768307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08951306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49107736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537615093","doi":"10.1080/03009734.2016.1238426","title":"Scholarly publishing threatened?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Generosity; Cheating; Medicine; Internet privacy; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.7333044164161997,"score_gpt":0.6030590586352609,"score_spread":0.13024535778093882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537615093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014621955,0.010541353,0.0020032132,0.57961476,0.016844127,0.000079497906,0.00063339865,0.00071218424,0.37494954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2764994,0.014283053,0.0039534546,0.3354323,0.02501121,0.00031026654,0.0014637705,0.001217208,0.34182927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714939,0.0077606402,0.0022222437,0.004125796,0.011255969,0.0031414428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92090285,0.01930804,0.012306656,0.010117336,0.013234492,0.024130702],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0163039,0.0006368391,0.0010571848,0.004769619,0.008872441,0.043330938,0.0025521624,0.00919614,0.11434189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09395719,0.00056785723,0.00077223603,0.009182585,0.011598374,0.030310977,0.014448104,0.009802122,0.047478266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081530605,0.00007835833,0.007094769,0.00038667215,0.000052791132,0.00084333855,0.00726603,0.000055856483,0.0004062578,0.26225087,0.5874469,0.13403668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010586319,0.000023315628,0.0014330825,0.0002862902,0.000008843498,0.00078175514,0.004027525,0.000046170622,0.00014050413,0.039519344,0.9537026,0.000020061258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00106428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012157329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007270731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009392115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38251173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543203851","doi":"","title":"Women and science in russia: A historical bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Research centre; Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.42285964240869117,"score_gpt":0.5329377129554134,"score_spread":0.1100780705467222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543203851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5406443,0.22034755,0.0031125145,0.014176591,0.00060775597,0.000058671485,0.0026980634,0.000060869905,0.21829359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409791,0.052632876,0.00058563915,0.0001850846,0.00041371022,0.000017808166,0.00040228054,0.0000164589,0.004766987],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980254,0.00082965934,0.00023208588,0.00024767977,0.0004558383,0.00020942252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963955,0.0020903854,0.00066461874,0.00020675642,0.00049415004,0.00014867655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029833878,0.00018645373,0.0005766389,0.01633973,0.001846915,0.004387368,0.00029339912,0.0004735351,0.002060141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061448617,0.00018569383,0.00034212298,0.030629193,0.0027565826,0.0026353914,0.002010237,0.000560916,0.00032818824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003037795,0.0000769397,0.23301935,0.002725621,0.0004781506,0.00072975387,0.0499156,0.0023551309,0.0008830729,0.29741147,0.009244379,0.40285683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008513142,0.00011278142,0.5034133,0.002019818,0.00022164108,0.0005420102,0.019974457,0.0010503565,0.0008917492,0.027179183,0.44453067,0.000055441826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017207881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01707019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032950696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04085225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555090082","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4305","title":"Facteur d’impact","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University; Princeton University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Wayne State University; State University of New York; Stanford Bio-X; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.28085876525509357,"score_gpt":0.4106691854325936,"score_spread":0.12981042017750005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555090082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067700082,0.04333769,0.005242082,0.014740321,0.0032923399,0.00008687778,0.003047653,0.00021665997,0.9232663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41026506,0.12953404,0.0096549615,0.007747,0.008871399,0.00045668546,0.0065648756,0.0005026516,0.4264032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935196,0.0008892208,0.00040523513,0.00088743534,0.0037739498,0.0005244882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125004,0.004707554,0.0008550407,0.00060492934,0.002174196,0.0004082732],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004184737,0.0009491135,0.0008788576,0.0097461175,0.002660094,0.01344197,0.00094589835,0.0022414578,0.04286089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014209468,0.00040851368,0.00095882145,0.010718681,0.004266899,0.007678682,0.003646789,0.0036400934,0.009227213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007269971,0.00002460412,0.00276069,0.0008209245,0.000085181055,0.00035903437,0.0022176804,0.00050945126,0.0003964906,0.7875302,0.07098194,0.1342412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108170925,0.000024201046,0.003429188,0.0009121372,0.00004051757,0.00044029605,0.0008321138,0.00011541776,0.00035941193,0.06969147,0.9241122,0.000032286975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011226932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009865774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99025387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006242182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14338398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559104316","doi":"10.1177/0959354316681689","title":"For a Virtual Wayzgoose: A Farewell Editorial on the Mutations of Theory and Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Debt; Reflection (computer programming); Closing (real estate); Sociology; Introspection; Epistemology; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.514911939698338,"score_gpt":0.6211698452053035,"score_spread":0.10625790550696546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559104316","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062870524,0.0029254053,0.00014593474,0.0899937,0.9062428,0.0000061463434,0.000016817541,0.000041751075,0.0005646076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012835242,0.003150611,0.00030328069,0.049974836,0.9388535,0.000014442034,0.000019919538,0.00008168966,0.0063182455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897349,0.0026534877,0.0010533055,0.0012753482,0.004545363,0.00073764764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232813,0.037412204,0.0034373463,0.002020029,0.0247505,0.009098586],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013464887,0.0021246134,0.0022209066,0.0042436398,0.0058144275,0.016086338,0.003139275,0.008470457,0.009004335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476009,0.00081825204,0.0020238245,0.0020915272,0.004453626,0.008204787,0.0021901296,0.017814573,0.0058650076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017460718,0.000007967582,0.000036868514,0.000062500025,0.000008353133,0.00006618426,0.000048937163,0.000013685652,0.000033725686,0.0006524314,0.9957567,0.003295069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024509569,0.000037281574,0.0003339711,0.00048522447,0.00003249438,0.0002558822,0.00029987356,0.0001738046,0.00012524203,0.0030942282,0.99509746,0.000040072275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015246077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005300706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98391366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032086144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057715992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07120997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560530650","doi":"10.1002/ase.1671","title":"Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anatomical Sciences Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Transparency (behavior); Diligence; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Work (physics); Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5069851338706,"score_gpt":0.5885490069478322,"score_spread":0.08156387307723223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560530650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18832299,0.025037479,0.011278811,0.46316165,0.021882314,0.00038538317,0.0010051902,0.0024431958,0.28648293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8115158,0.011477411,0.005801843,0.075328365,0.015408721,0.00025130055,0.0006011224,0.0012518022,0.078363664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388662,0.024355201,0.0033742397,0.0034370436,0.026627779,0.0033395435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7715463,0.08064365,0.057795014,0.031327955,0.0321279,0.026559183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037077,0.0006234982,0.0010482101,0.006281848,0.01611771,0.022896864,0.0026937502,0.005063077,0.02210869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17274986,0.0007471642,0.00093869946,0.008455228,0.015842915,0.012794204,0.011735052,0.0070286547,0.010355171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042112748,0.00020057814,0.03381864,0.0009693463,0.00019793944,0.00379159,0.059205186,0.00021766874,0.0010479672,0.09207136,0.6228033,0.18525538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053356885,0.0001711362,0.0142424125,0.0008601409,0.000052192598,0.0049847434,0.041497115,0.0005110845,0.0009051301,0.048332144,0.8882717,0.00011874943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021147714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004549488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99493694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006055056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074059926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19608426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563712121","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/18/10/19","title":"Tiny department tops research rankings","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPS; Computer science; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.8324245437436233,"score_gpt":0.6684415546389956,"score_spread":0.16398298910462772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563712121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13365908,0.01684767,0.0023423573,0.050205886,0.005134133,0.00015086668,0.073308945,0.0041252524,0.71422577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66997594,0.014041809,0.004162302,0.007290119,0.005233333,0.000181064,0.059553877,0.0017144862,0.23784705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834794,0.0013290207,0.00077357143,0.0011845981,0.010941041,0.0022923618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548379,0.004355977,0.0030931153,0.0019684187,0.018562207,0.017182393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005500172,0.0005683968,0.0011709777,0.019706817,0.0021434592,0.01039542,0.0011776725,0.0008377159,0.05269443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028423626,0.0004530574,0.00059308205,0.023631794,0.00095005584,0.002730154,0.0037873518,0.0012164691,0.018818287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049875514,0.00006404053,0.04791105,0.0008032548,0.00017712031,0.00020100127,0.00057630654,0.00040950466,0.0015461054,0.03281082,0.74397236,0.17102964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010282859,0.0001448334,0.1094652,0.0001917114,0.00009765809,0.0003130643,0.0010405078,0.0007454841,0.0014315104,0.0058984235,0.8804965,0.00007225518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033741187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09281409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104410155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17628044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564107690","doi":"10.29173/cais265","title":"The Effects of Electronic Publication on Social Science Researchers in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Commodity; Publishing; Revenue; Electronic publishing; Public relations; Information Dissemination; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet; Accounting","score_opus":0.20195332987001907,"score_gpt":0.42728402122148335,"score_spread":0.22533069135146427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564107690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5897008,0.01581931,0.00045176942,0.20315942,0.001536517,0.00029771842,0.008134909,0.00024570932,0.18065387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403096,0.011204383,0.0005213713,0.008473021,0.00055199256,0.00009926912,0.0017361741,0.00008201274,0.03702214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95591855,0.005292143,0.0022620955,0.0016883152,0.025518984,0.009319966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7473468,0.062523454,0.02974771,0.0062463223,0.11993186,0.034203775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144824395,0.0004457193,0.0011038145,0.012175112,0.014400368,0.014062563,0.0033463833,0.0029801556,0.01633209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11343049,0.0006331767,0.00095099997,0.03427718,0.0061304145,0.0039390856,0.0077302326,0.0035228962,0.0013675262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025542057,0.0008016787,0.47108206,0.0011433214,0.00046165395,0.0031229758,0.025402287,0.004686747,0.0015207641,0.07683453,0.18629135,0.22609845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055331574,0.0003398677,0.67943674,0.0010426706,0.00033963233,0.0006301678,0.03716434,0.0038923186,0.0017472696,0.008070322,0.26636738,0.0004160058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99205947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20327118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35092282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92409253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564123428","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v9i4.347","title":"Upcoming IJTMB Initiatives from the Interim Executive Editor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Massage Therapy Foundation","keywords":"Interim; Audience measurement; Honor; Privilege (computing); Public relations; Political science; Executive director; Management; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.45889148631759114,"score_gpt":0.6574437069409884,"score_spread":0.19855222062339728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564123428","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007423336,0.0013623065,0.0003464621,0.044501193,0.9504722,0.000049013714,0.00004993469,0.00012950714,0.0030153051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011798711,0.0033228293,0.0011139908,0.039030984,0.91615427,0.000110297435,0.00011541326,0.00020895334,0.03876333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826021,0.0016093123,0.0020651233,0.0013412329,0.01138414,0.0009980927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8743348,0.0133328,0.006150399,0.0029010314,0.07657435,0.026706588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02200355,0.0022868414,0.0020313968,0.0044998084,0.0048492947,0.019356865,0.0031924904,0.011887804,0.034461718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08218272,0.00096413185,0.001990778,0.002516208,0.0023117883,0.006951194,0.002751032,0.015403891,0.03729746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002311742,0.000028911521,0.000076270575,0.00017869475,0.0000066192415,0.00012081375,0.000034307133,0.000024774612,0.000091227186,0.00044379648,0.9898616,0.0091098435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027768207,0.000030378134,0.00025978527,0.00039257287,0.000015150216,0.0002452281,0.0001397862,0.00011654972,0.0001633185,0.0012194911,0.99736977,0.00002007001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001136485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003999205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034461718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003336479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009742285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11636728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564862754","doi":"","title":"Applying social network analysis to examine the shared nature of athlete leadership within a competitive hockey team: A longitudinal case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shared leadership; Construct (python library); Psychology; Longitudinal study; Social network analysis; Task (project management); Social network (sociolinguistics); Team sport; Social psychology; Leadership development; Applied psychology; Leadership style; Public relations; Management; Social capital; Athletes; Political science; Computer science; Social media","score_opus":0.1950098271565918,"score_gpt":0.40931646733998517,"score_spread":0.21430664018339338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564862754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908193,0.00021449177,0.005662937,0.00047516948,0.000019361802,0.00034566037,0.00028485086,0.00001068298,0.0021675527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258936,0.0005505619,0.014511469,0.00010822673,0.000027671464,0.0005952241,0.00042002997,0.000009553194,0.0011879611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660707,0.0021223063,0.0001511671,0.00033105141,0.0004476798,0.00034077305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277335,0.0033058594,0.0013232311,0.000489823,0.0014770004,0.0006307421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075186184,0.0003748067,0.00032160454,0.0037547892,0.0033401058,0.0015428079,0.0011359162,0.00078911707,0.0013580021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092622535,0.0003162629,0.0005515652,0.0019309003,0.0009597597,0.0018596363,0.0022273753,0.0011086098,0.00018914141],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001892042,0.0016938252,0.75766796,0.00032130067,0.00018347675,0.0072496706,0.15202314,0.0016750074,0.0018545239,0.005883428,0.0035889857,0.06766939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078608784,0.0012743417,0.5380732,0.00060903584,0.0002270483,0.004225012,0.3963631,0.028363764,0.0024304162,0.0070128283,0.021186646,0.00015597421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018126464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041131794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018126464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025058684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019852794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039762735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565597050","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1702121114","title":"The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Prestige; Diversity (politics); Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.6174522038660023,"score_gpt":0.5787121461691838,"score_spread":0.03874005769681854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565597050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7470581,0.007109413,0.13265596,0.0319526,0.0006050344,0.00015217716,0.035898022,0.0006695208,0.04389925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785156,0.0017130305,0.010872373,0.00086538726,0.00028786453,0.00012213622,0.00465156,0.0001085695,0.0028634754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959835,0.0016708486,0.0004976147,0.0008582302,0.00080334884,0.0001864952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96059203,0.02247182,0.0070519624,0.006202219,0.0029092457,0.00077270897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005812898,0.00033948623,0.0004902586,0.004886732,0.0015524036,0.0053390735,0.0009868841,0.0009658226,0.0031397839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07318283,0.00030794236,0.00038072857,0.011414561,0.0027588909,0.00824133,0.0024165267,0.0014717143,0.0010969683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063991337,0.00009630682,0.318058,0.00071221637,0.00027973598,0.0005200673,0.026281754,0.012043045,0.0014342164,0.44172707,0.041376412,0.15683131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006112903,0.0001614623,0.23870306,0.00071668526,0.00016761858,0.0016440054,0.017388534,0.040945113,0.0025720864,0.50166076,0.19577718,0.00020229326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076829707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004645048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99511325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022685942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015568383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03074193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565692730","doi":"","title":"Working Towards a Standard Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.2165147500558145,"score_gpt":0.4233536953542099,"score_spread":0.20683894529839542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565692730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00932966,0.005129307,0.25820524,0.18617654,0.003809806,0.00023129962,0.00034223433,0.0006382953,0.53613764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5208288,0.0074105985,0.21866988,0.047257733,0.0033219014,0.0015487899,0.0015582452,0.0018889575,0.19751519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861174,0.0070172455,0.00074466463,0.0018976891,0.003327181,0.00089581596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919092,0.002181588,0.00041262043,0.0020945682,0.0025155155,0.00088637095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01807898,0.0011499445,0.0011723746,0.0021636866,0.0058351234,0.013244908,0.0038756193,0.005957408,0.020177554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017170751,0.0008087545,0.0017120643,0.0014535589,0.021195333,0.024762442,0.008430542,0.01312473,0.006114824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026664961,0.000006347346,0.000029793462,0.000012861978,0.000001773397,0.0000082584775,0.0006408275,0.00008599535,0.00003098183,0.99340266,0.004398515,0.0013791337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049585524,0.000010509746,0.000044519977,0.000093362694,0.0000024052563,0.000023500932,0.0006354378,0.00065209245,0.00008943231,0.9234922,0.074942954,0.000008788611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005128709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00329928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010112778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09561193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571086138","doi":"10.1186/s12916-016-0773-5","title":"The Journal Impact Factor is under attack – use the CAPCI factor instead","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Medicine; Publishing; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.8179097266428235,"score_gpt":0.6585456402439596,"score_spread":0.1593640863988639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571086138","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032388658,0.017141324,0.0020644886,0.13349618,0.84484595,0.000024203066,0.00009598223,0.00018601194,0.0018219621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00671817,0.013552136,0.0023060048,0.07165404,0.9003037,0.000036226756,0.00008847629,0.00030317137,0.005037967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678486,0.0072455187,0.004355451,0.0043681003,0.015489408,0.00069294026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8253753,0.094161935,0.009363838,0.007480112,0.058711227,0.004907561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030165821,0.002137955,0.003026852,0.0068891714,0.0025917583,0.014173039,0.0042827674,0.010078615,0.0035660297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17771967,0.00066786294,0.0016559022,0.006144524,0.00989051,0.007012446,0.0018889273,0.021253204,0.0054768925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113831775,0.00002933795,0.0005928572,0.001449866,0.00016631118,0.0001906427,0.00025898396,0.00010347258,0.0005293384,0.010230884,0.94274616,0.043588445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059393493,0.000058394777,0.0011275618,0.0013883475,0.00016316902,0.00047279496,0.00032944596,0.0006703274,0.0008392856,0.015178069,0.97962564,0.00008760537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020318562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023420246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99311084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032594244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15953404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574224592","doi":"10.7577/formakademisk.1880","title":"Open access to scientific publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Norwegian; Publication; Library science; Scientific publishing; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8345386635894187,"score_gpt":0.6277893077125516,"score_spread":0.20674935587686716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574224592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013024097,0.028906062,0.020888217,0.027440917,0.04042451,0.0019793115,0.01327725,0.009123798,0.8566575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04282726,0.06970922,0.033310767,0.017483601,0.05467093,0.0053585763,0.045852985,0.015110488,0.7156762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9293809,0.014860012,0.0125504695,0.009962255,0.02822211,0.0050242636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7671597,0.06725425,0.020372527,0.06438991,0.05154714,0.02927646],"candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029782187,0.0031210228,0.0075235227,0.029579284,0.007076781,0.051952403,0.007221501,0.009461357,0.39566547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20334019,0.0022845794,0.0028336786,0.031371024,0.016240196,0.026304157,0.025301615,0.013046412,0.3719918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012032485,0.0001492985,0.0008655948,0.0049252277,0.00015400573,0.0005061586,0.0014271075,0.00026141503,0.0008811608,0.1302834,0.57410216,0.28632414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004092592,0.000049945516,0.0008600361,0.0023101987,0.00002640789,0.00039464515,0.00027963496,0.00011533733,0.00018794333,0.04376039,0.9519103,0.00006422477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009831622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011076797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080801975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034216195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8620099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576026594","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000001852","title":"Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecialty; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Medicine; Reproductive endocrinology and infertility; Gynecology; Reproductive medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Odds ratio; Obstetrics; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.4407357565372697,"score_gpt":0.5384816350212948,"score_spread":0.09774587848402505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576026594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8236281,0.094136655,0.009949813,0.03879734,0.0070328144,0.0021046351,0.00261345,0.00062194036,0.02111522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98256487,0.0038467147,0.007433315,0.001480759,0.0030034853,0.00049234513,0.0003573373,0.0000871338,0.000734138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.74265707,0.1102684,0.06742679,0.013075083,0.06264404,0.0039285896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.115304686,0.42384577,0.28111947,0.024435565,0.13232678,0.022967733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13450651,0.00053744897,0.0016166369,0.008873871,0.0025495624,0.005905806,0.0016586737,0.0019887213,0.0041538286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64569294,0.000771072,0.0020728272,0.0075385207,0.002227404,0.0034579113,0.0029659546,0.0014646999,0.0007410319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009375705,0.00013263358,0.91017187,0.0037937423,0.0020442647,0.00044735262,0.0018720492,0.000200449,0.00076780916,0.00039966477,0.010446795,0.06878571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022388175,0.000637736,0.97576785,0.003138165,0.0014630395,0.002198286,0.0013760674,0.0012813198,0.00073184044,0.00064306706,0.012407098,0.00013166615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035415036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008795951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043762117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014827552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583760632","doi":"","title":"Factors Affecting Researchers' Collaborative Patterns: A Case Study from Maghreb Universities / Les facteurs affectant les pratiques de collaboration des chercheurs : Une étude de cas des universités maghrébines","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Regional science; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.3660604929998541,"score_gpt":0.4633948524617138,"score_spread":0.0973343594618597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583760632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831104,0.00038778232,0.0001266897,0.0005037211,0.0000064485084,0.000020556288,0.0000179868,0.0000029777093,0.0006227788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986559,0.00036441104,0.00037421333,0.00010102358,0.0000103694965,0.00002263505,0.000015963305,0.0000029781017,0.0004525359],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038345,0.0049941377,0.00079441146,0.00072803313,0.001287639,0.0018123274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96594095,0.020477204,0.0063503156,0.0007484973,0.0028793656,0.0036035532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010972832,0.00034112216,0.0006752573,0.0045774565,0.013082066,0.004698212,0.0013561874,0.0023880897,0.0019950524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024346609,0.0004994667,0.00044963806,0.006529533,0.0024355843,0.0025513568,0.0046355184,0.0011905301,0.00027688633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019890191,0.00040797677,0.4510344,0.00024592047,0.00006356984,0.008893171,0.50353634,0.00010038511,0.0017127956,0.00083869667,0.0005338739,0.032434013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024916584,0.00022378909,0.31121656,0.00015282455,0.00009576211,0.003530309,0.6778731,0.00021517214,0.00083588273,0.00030368048,0.005469675,0.000058399248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064346075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14608297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99542254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068631344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008947261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1279431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585591443","doi":"10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9","title":"Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Internet privacy; Impact factor; The Internet; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6717010139878978,"score_gpt":0.6176027597723336,"score_spread":0.054098254215564245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585591443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981927,0.0006086901,0.000112644564,0.00021390987,0.000022820488,0.000042186235,0.00044793196,0.0000034546372,0.0003555513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987662,0.0002447034,0.0000774624,0.00015338915,0.000045957757,0.00007030253,0.0005259123,0.0000028229967,0.0001132414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963762,0.0012438077,0.00071123184,0.000574367,0.00074433815,0.00034992734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699393,0.013543256,0.011356512,0.0011027907,0.001765518,0.0022926535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00661158,0.00032176368,0.0010049978,0.0030563213,0.0006371548,0.0012978474,0.00071888533,0.0016017685,0.0034962725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026834961,0.00056061835,0.0008222164,0.0032100603,0.0010573454,0.0030591674,0.0012688827,0.00077190535,0.00065434695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055805995,0.00013533744,0.9967213,0.00007075958,0.0001942328,0.00008639626,0.0006040947,0.000013271263,0.00008208568,0.000054062668,0.00015013112,0.0013301889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000647389,0.0010937753,0.9952715,0.000039395418,0.00014911211,0.00031440041,0.0024598658,0.00014159168,0.000043412852,0.00011830371,0.0002899623,0.00001399874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008785224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082758925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99839824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003303744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034183575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034965813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586606665","doi":"10.5539/ass.v13n3p1","title":"Understanding Faculty Collaboration and Productivity: A Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"Productivity; Promotion (chess); Christian ministry; Internationalization; Higher education; Business; Public relations; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.8111552102405455,"score_gpt":0.6368228360453961,"score_spread":0.17433237419514935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586606665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809224,0.00076239166,0.0056572235,0.0023208796,0.000023554325,0.00015483107,0.0002449796,0.0000406893,0.009873207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009585,0.000888737,0.006907491,0.00019880278,0.000045173012,0.00014210951,0.00014445704,0.000018873865,0.0015584935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933476,0.0044217245,0.000303612,0.0004455837,0.00074974715,0.00073179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596121,0.03221758,0.0029800823,0.001187128,0.0021180534,0.0018851708],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064823,0.0003960746,0.00044318696,0.005990656,0.006192482,0.0040151183,0.0018388517,0.002619558,0.0030763568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020792272,0.0003135704,0.0006868565,0.010744322,0.0017846054,0.0057655578,0.0030734115,0.0015159018,0.00038297003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042908892,0.0039654695,0.32329237,0.00097086024,0.0001362676,0.020644313,0.43019655,0.004756014,0.0026810912,0.030099278,0.0071944003,0.17563426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014619259,0.0006888472,0.13871,0.0006218541,0.00017095786,0.0050350204,0.7587571,0.024285436,0.0036387527,0.015501426,0.052334663,0.00010968654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016403234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024173543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005800934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037352461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047939956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586978505","doi":"10.29173/cais156","title":"A Note on Maximum Impact Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Log-normal distribution; Mathematics; Statistics; Value (mathematics); Constant (computer programming); Impact factor; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23459389169425204,"score_gpt":0.4466566847427,"score_spread":0.21206279304844794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586978505","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029579023,0.086288795,0.6622684,0.015187792,0.0075479355,0.00018325476,0.007886253,0.0053809844,0.18567756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6083958,0.034998454,0.3130292,0.004213326,0.007884346,0.0004549203,0.0040574805,0.0018620698,0.025104309],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912663,0.002941647,0.00084005523,0.0014787546,0.0028082363,0.00066494825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9344066,0.052789927,0.0019225276,0.006575361,0.0038307097,0.0004749905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008393461,0.0013488535,0.0017273295,0.004941248,0.0014505985,0.00424521,0.0026681062,0.0015329309,0.015566868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0783507,0.0006778974,0.0017509642,0.0079936115,0.001408649,0.006833039,0.0018406747,0.0041901274,0.0046475795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081498944,0.00013896999,0.008065773,0.0022719614,0.00020850501,0.0007514535,0.00054955494,0.03952547,0.0032365078,0.38304678,0.108122736,0.4532673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000690341,0.00063314615,0.0084847985,0.0017189495,0.00010057246,0.0023597337,0.00045439054,0.02264515,0.0073643457,0.65957546,0.29627252,0.00032186625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013992025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010187863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012330831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012457714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05207634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586984894","doi":"","title":"Author Impact Measures in Communication Sciences and Disorders","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Index (typography); Rank (graph theory); Accreditation; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Medical education; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.3506480710563327,"score_gpt":0.4601388249772967,"score_spread":0.10949075392096397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586984894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83245677,0.011411945,0.006922625,0.0014459052,0.0004666504,0.0023742237,0.07082688,0.0003342894,0.073760785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492497,0.0043149637,0.012947417,0.00028052658,0.0004983326,0.002921039,0.022267736,0.00008499204,0.0074353023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98592955,0.002916501,0.0030572626,0.00067876186,0.0067806733,0.0006372703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9010302,0.043719146,0.029787239,0.002912352,0.017436683,0.005114387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012085034,0.00064418826,0.0010347595,0.0478498,0.0014878445,0.0030515245,0.0008115264,0.0006234682,0.0075202915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06664198,0.0001588957,0.0011792117,0.049047407,0.0011174136,0.0026043518,0.0032499107,0.00072657544,0.0010563884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056531123,0.0003962427,0.85491323,0.002156764,0.00046148335,0.00022645779,0.002978247,0.001386434,0.00066690217,0.0049975426,0.0123807965,0.11887062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052628788,0.00046981935,0.9637739,0.00041765685,0.00027214928,0.00061154336,0.0024542091,0.00094253186,0.0011459901,0.0037194565,0.026084093,0.000056048975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004592913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016367044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035121108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046538264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587002354","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2017.1280936","title":"Science transformed? A comparative analysis of ‘societal relevance’ rhetoric and practices in 14 Canadian Networks of Centres of Excellence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Mandate; Commercialization; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Rhetoric; Political science; Sociology; Funding Agency; Science policy; Science communication; Relevance (law); Public administration; Science education; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.44495664085385184,"score_gpt":0.5618280944689807,"score_spread":0.1168714536151289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587002354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310011,0.0011053131,0.0013561399,0.006533705,0.000067264235,0.00028511893,0.00030415136,0.0000522433,0.05929485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974623,0.00018905556,0.000502329,0.00016002577,0.0000053867448,0.00003843894,0.00004512942,0.000012812229,0.0015845188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9468039,0.02074454,0.0014694069,0.0029261785,0.01992572,0.00813027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86349547,0.07485812,0.012717428,0.004612462,0.03336721,0.010949347],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041727465,0.0004073094,0.00076372415,0.011619378,0.021571299,0.018665137,0.003137449,0.0025883697,0.0030787166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08939158,0.0005290076,0.00030420235,0.015042333,0.02102903,0.0044681,0.010951492,0.0020021133,0.00017652972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015091425,0.000057371668,0.03360923,0.0004150423,0.00004366813,0.0009590461,0.87066877,0.0005928088,0.0014341153,0.053429626,0.0033016345,0.035337735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018831688,0.00007059718,0.08437637,0.00044355242,0.000046578218,0.00013230612,0.8180083,0.0010443757,0.00079531135,0.003979074,0.09095078,0.0001338984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8705009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88978666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18755588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18077645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94232005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587252982","doi":"10.18192/uojm.v7i1.1755","title":"Predatory Journals : Do Not Enter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Audience measurement; Political science; Credibility; Publishing; Library science; Art; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5181515019525601,"score_gpt":0.5358257010649157,"score_spread":0.01767419911235557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587252982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04443722,0.013877153,0.006784118,0.26640856,0.024506468,0.00037898048,0.0010289082,0.002380036,0.6401985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49991596,0.012432058,0.006946796,0.12741092,0.01530751,0.0006027716,0.0010382679,0.0030975188,0.3332481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96270245,0.01099276,0.0028094535,0.0029089048,0.017218033,0.0033684308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72702754,0.08759937,0.045926698,0.036918823,0.059551902,0.042975664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016539536,0.0005814989,0.00096762413,0.004174607,0.0087118745,0.033346545,0.0028512485,0.007516804,0.089724965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21850118,0.00077279954,0.0005220979,0.0051707253,0.013017911,0.026632907,0.01653386,0.006021612,0.04189736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002792869,0.00022233569,0.019924514,0.0015486439,0.000059837188,0.0023055084,0.027449528,0.00008293259,0.001153187,0.22219189,0.54877454,0.17600776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002877496,0.00007682973,0.003693436,0.0011042032,0.000018633978,0.001338107,0.009462665,0.00009207768,0.00044964266,0.036024075,0.9476592,0.00005238953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020540769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034638797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056644343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013612746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30015987},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2587601278","doi":"10.59348/fv8ch-rjm75","title":"Dissemination and Assessment: Open Access, Reputation and Economics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Economics; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8350313941308984,"score_gpt":0.7252318026089551,"score_spread":0.1097995915219433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587601278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038657426,0.07367032,0.06971883,0.5378851,0.036874402,0.002244411,0.0074412413,0.0034025693,0.26489735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4180727,0.13469253,0.09084168,0.04368404,0.06024937,0.0058386517,0.010937298,0.004103828,0.23157984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8070169,0.09674634,0.013736343,0.008061894,0.07057071,0.0038677908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39764586,0.3094962,0.036736805,0.08317217,0.15182284,0.021126114],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16817443,0.0012259603,0.0034312196,0.015341438,0.0058943094,0.053069025,0.0035649915,0.011712732,0.09609008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.62509245,0.0014462025,0.0013126289,0.032043893,0.013739543,0.035850257,0.016029831,0.009370755,0.027051123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021651224,0.000052860374,0.0024351892,0.0034815806,0.00020652407,0.0001265877,0.0009172879,0.0008469654,0.00030930713,0.29376197,0.3789792,0.318666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011187036,0.00006288994,0.0032307769,0.0037510742,0.00008823683,0.00017106689,0.0006088725,0.002249416,0.00045784505,0.33116794,0.6579682,0.00013184064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00952828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005236079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016193237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04278561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88940203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589205765","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Entrepreneurship: In Ottawa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9595516944596619,"score_gpt":0.7220228475040606,"score_spread":0.23752884695560128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589205765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03768251,0.16220401,0.005748515,0.11180921,0.0049776942,0.000515556,0.050395586,0.0021121544,0.6245548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07559794,0.040828485,0.007221683,0.001808929,0.00024609725,0.00021179573,0.006351782,0.0006678465,0.8670655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388367,0.0009862145,0.0008437687,0.00083133555,0.0026253117,0.0008296656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835307,0.0051596975,0.00095761084,0.001295519,0.006094778,0.0029616258],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005709664,0.00095670443,0.001010685,0.009458459,0.008042849,0.015491368,0.0018077004,0.0032643976,0.058721185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015929608,0.0012415674,0.00046015801,0.029101666,0.006840246,0.006808457,0.004880732,0.0033152478,0.013059219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024004064,0.000062224404,0.0096668415,0.0020480147,0.000036282298,0.00034604818,0.011186922,0.0008297711,0.00048833434,0.12395267,0.60972315,0.24141978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017860937,0.000016109872,0.01772174,0.0006758285,0.000020738165,0.00007545597,0.005127951,0.00019939792,0.00049961015,0.004487247,0.9710812,0.000076918455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91391325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98450863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058157995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14391597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42196774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589854312","doi":"10.1139/facets-2016-0032","title":"Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Open access publishing; Limiting; Scholarly communication; Ecology; Impact factor; Open science; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Engineering; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.846648632210217,"score_gpt":0.7068189903548356,"score_spread":0.13982964185538138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589854312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927135,0.0016293941,0.00033438063,0.00042551622,0.00006839659,0.000019435056,0.00027007837,0.00003051173,0.0045088166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994142,0.0012615215,0.00072429585,0.00022097687,0.00019737055,0.000022193919,0.00043995224,0.000019437372,0.0029722631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639744,0.0007564971,0.00057391,0.0005778282,0.0013708089,0.00032348422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424082,0.025862148,0.020132562,0.001575015,0.005915436,0.004106653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023492621,0.00024090892,0.00062137505,0.0092950575,0.0009057943,0.0036969515,0.0004223434,0.0007298392,0.005457245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026123622,0.00016062942,0.0006966043,0.014691686,0.0007112154,0.0023539786,0.0025793372,0.00071023736,0.00083648437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034456805,0.0003349174,0.933573,0.00041885383,0.0005755172,0.00060924067,0.0025781284,0.00020357335,0.0063857506,0.0019313949,0.0008134198,0.052231617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021755754,0.000096749936,0.9903714,0.0000406129,0.00010822735,0.0002732571,0.0019578082,0.00016296537,0.0012685615,0.0013447889,0.0043352563,0.00001862786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019521909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003727259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99957764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010296092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009065523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018256307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590507073","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3703","title":"An Exploration of Faculty Experiences With Open Access Journal Publishing at Two Canadian Comprehensive Universities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries; Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Scholarly communication; Descriptive statistics; The arts; Outreach; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.8004430090618715,"score_gpt":0.6257924483870849,"score_spread":0.17465056067478657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590507073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98644185,0.00062967173,0.00033315274,0.0028721262,0.000064060434,0.00013131567,0.00018866226,0.000024182138,0.009315025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345434,0.0007270522,0.00040977448,0.0009158219,0.000033011856,0.00007447251,0.00008537436,0.000016450604,0.004283742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854248,0.004109358,0.0006743004,0.0008261233,0.0051845666,0.0037808036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583711,0.016007496,0.004156977,0.0008349507,0.009290555,0.011338924],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012090932,0.0003560718,0.000702939,0.0031963198,0.03154045,0.010473794,0.0026752863,0.0016190461,0.0057371734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030754456,0.00053865596,0.0004680509,0.007380598,0.010450671,0.00325779,0.0064451005,0.0019811457,0.00048490037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057854744,0.00007365188,0.019372528,0.0001505612,0.0000060767607,0.00077437446,0.9649603,0.000031483258,0.0006531374,0.00085864746,0.0015329653,0.011528433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005095168,0.0000673961,0.015935922,0.00011010839,0.0000071354484,0.00014886586,0.9664226,0.00004761525,0.0002785842,0.0001284674,0.016816966,0.000031247575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76162326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87228185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05414116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10833834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47956115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.17402035465506505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590870827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019307803,0.021777323,0.0034916496,0.21151692,0.0075957417,0.000267748,0.0005088483,0.000387682,0.73514634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3984296,0.014938175,0.0065052304,0.020346895,0.001253669,0.00016866044,0.00046726593,0.0003818422,0.5575087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900643,0.0016546997,0.00029095274,0.00040564104,0.005708227,0.0018760937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811582,0.0047712824,0.0006220691,0.0011362225,0.005060332,0.00725192],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071371,0.0004667742,0.00031592476,0.0048274854,0.028215924,0.017774602,0.0024179043,0.007817216,0.062170856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018866263,0.00045461935,0.00048895046,0.00734365,0.016049791,0.015772313,0.006449465,0.00474793,0.0053229975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007018458,0.00010435594,0.002578433,0.00026049867,0.000011207097,0.0020738917,0.021618787,0.00010130066,0.0005671481,0.26134804,0.5755153,0.13575082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012870325,0.000019783254,0.0053062383,0.0003501553,0.000013663099,0.00046199746,0.020926263,0.00012223105,0.0004322938,0.03273942,0.9395524,0.00006253481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54135686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018155022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049661774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92268836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591407960","doi":"10.29173/cais338","title":"Optimizing the Transformation of Knowledge Dissemination: Towards a Canadian Research Strategy: Preliminary Results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Political science; Relevance (law); Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.31530120657037286,"score_gpt":0.4702846259320446,"score_spread":0.15498341936167176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591407960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58975655,0.006928172,0.024573812,0.040274344,0.00030301843,0.01853887,0.0037776805,0.00064470404,0.31520286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010015,0.003984962,0.06932643,0.0026054846,0.000028405584,0.0029693022,0.0019710455,0.00012752211,0.017985284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9326643,0.028322665,0.0027604238,0.0032350263,0.022611365,0.010406278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9201217,0.020014608,0.0027258985,0.004078621,0.045162532,0.007896519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051890302,0.0012318451,0.0014981027,0.0050418177,0.017286498,0.01745833,0.0031845265,0.0025244062,0.006320333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08669606,0.0007130981,0.0012532299,0.015308424,0.0050274935,0.0076110796,0.00852535,0.0025946246,0.0009598438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019157504,0.0029762285,0.11985358,0.0054460685,0.00035851685,0.0007519295,0.129974,0.012654597,0.0050362805,0.16870043,0.03175778,0.5205748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012449005,0.0021232832,0.24061994,0.0034525325,0.0012304264,0.00025405595,0.41236162,0.029842522,0.013084041,0.034561735,0.2606396,0.0005854086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97088665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9650826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17508519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.419789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95678425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591413103","doi":"10.1515/jdis-2017-0003","title":"Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Generalizability theory; Computer science; Information retrieval; Reliability (semiconductor); Scalability; Citation analysis; Data science; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; Database","score_opus":0.6861484169349686,"score_gpt":0.616220425292139,"score_spread":0.06992799164282959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591413103","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13329087,0.0046602325,0.8270862,0.009538154,0.0010369957,0.0019066841,0.00096004026,0.00072945346,0.02079126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81568116,0.00073207007,0.1764697,0.0015569883,0.00080639025,0.0023311044,0.00040017228,0.00037708075,0.0016452103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7672187,0.15352848,0.019142898,0.023722662,0.033634856,0.00275256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15850212,0.7431701,0.027248317,0.03984656,0.02917479,0.0020581738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25667712,0.0018202281,0.0035066763,0.019780785,0.005222947,0.01015096,0.0064507853,0.0035342618,0.0064643747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74997056,0.001008003,0.0051677534,0.025737312,0.01622222,0.02474306,0.008823165,0.007000006,0.001008245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012244736,0.00037755867,0.15262754,0.0027335084,0.0026774157,0.00072522624,0.014101044,0.015903363,0.0012094565,0.48004138,0.008271115,0.3201079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000132864,0.00030892075,0.03752904,0.001149492,0.00062666705,0.0005459771,0.0033197638,0.075921945,0.001868019,0.8694096,0.008968745,0.0002189298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007210566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030611036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98021924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061986158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051852516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91664946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591428690","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Chief Scientist of Quebec on Science Advice at the Sub-National Level","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2017 AAAS Annual Meeting (February 16-20, 2017)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); NASA Chief Scientist; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.28007599708106107,"score_gpt":0.4737946592179971,"score_spread":0.19371866213693606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591428690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048665474,0.014277187,0.001664556,0.3165946,0.026801622,0.0003835976,0.021666141,0.001578892,0.6121668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021420186,0.0045460653,0.002562443,0.019874109,0.0009098089,0.00006236692,0.0036441186,0.0003510967,0.94662976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905067,0.000609341,0.00029098726,0.00081921736,0.006205186,0.0015685898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313415,0.0022886535,0.0007755255,0.0013128546,0.054736406,0.009545029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005788369,0.00083741266,0.0014747286,0.005327309,0.011173441,0.009487591,0.0020448344,0.0045697154,0.214776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021795643,0.00074466027,0.0009037839,0.007145417,0.0020155224,0.002928086,0.0020748936,0.0043058433,0.03375916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022253824,0.0000110520195,0.0009018207,0.00006672573,0.000010870592,0.000049859587,0.0000980512,0.000055855904,0.00013689756,0.0034392076,0.9809986,0.014208817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013645782,0.0000054681414,0.0024339128,0.00009165928,0.000010669692,0.000021232134,0.00020837208,0.00014722106,0.00013647143,0.00035502002,0.996561,0.00001531164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97976047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08737377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3314913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7184973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592422958","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.137","title":"The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Political science; Advertising; Psychology; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6179006571062694,"score_gpt":0.5339360884481533,"score_spread":0.08396456865811608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592422958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636009,0.0013109875,0.0012421866,0.0058216257,0.00016210573,0.00005277307,0.00016857164,0.000054422206,0.027586516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756515,0.00032795354,0.00024411915,0.00014484698,0.00013341768,0.0000102559925,0.000031114207,0.000008226003,0.0015349911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847356,0.004642516,0.0006955421,0.0005718624,0.0077917865,0.0015627772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69991344,0.1230768,0.09186301,0.006863333,0.026385948,0.051897474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008567909,0.0001930132,0.00069615705,0.004857385,0.0033309401,0.0063053267,0.0008581448,0.0008778124,0.009057947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09954071,0.00021873516,0.00023673927,0.0055394787,0.0028229335,0.0025244278,0.0037191105,0.0014343207,0.0011222087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009824907,0.00064093695,0.80804396,0.0005417383,0.00022443222,0.0018735701,0.011840645,0.0013383196,0.002573009,0.021484604,0.01039554,0.14006075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008528827,0.0005666946,0.9358639,0.00023361888,0.000093250324,0.001056651,0.011347509,0.0014421043,0.0016660934,0.01922023,0.028327579,0.0000970801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058638873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016144568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055075656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00855456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045311987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592437185","doi":"10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x","title":"Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"3v Geomatics (Canada); Women's Health Research Institute; B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre","funders":"British Ecological Society; Ecological Society of America; Society for the Study of Evolution","keywords":"Demography; Medicine; Gerontology; Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.8090483276171163,"score_gpt":0.6622627539633377,"score_spread":0.14678557365377864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592437185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91468894,0.0078572985,0.0043733395,0.0298153,0.0033064804,0.0009665135,0.0016513926,0.00024846228,0.037092153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98407054,0.0009737338,0.003057483,0.0040525733,0.0026848943,0.00054878,0.00047789983,0.00009778268,0.0040363003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.73798627,0.12278651,0.032471757,0.017985646,0.08314203,0.005627798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.100438416,0.5813072,0.16118853,0.021322127,0.11915073,0.01659304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2141332,0.0004870108,0.001405304,0.0055383025,0.004486203,0.009230492,0.002353366,0.0028117544,0.0059882407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6609935,0.00055220386,0.0013542488,0.005720746,0.004488975,0.0059113214,0.0045077656,0.00231314,0.0014178912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020067312,0.00042057072,0.8596204,0.0022912014,0.0010289312,0.00047258986,0.023248028,0.0004084193,0.0012332159,0.0019707815,0.020715775,0.0865834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021998609,0.0013038128,0.95803857,0.0007780946,0.00048463844,0.00054010807,0.012035061,0.0011262359,0.000867285,0.0018262577,0.022666985,0.000112843816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004571433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067517175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7858668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003948018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008562455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96911365},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2592511444","doi":"","title":"Portraying the Landscape of Canadian Library and Information Science Research = Portrait de la recherche en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information au Canada","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Library science; Information scientist; Information science; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.4033794212991128,"score_gpt":0.4577124276854481,"score_spread":0.054333006386335314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592511444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20652264,0.021557724,0.006657533,0.056053117,0.00027427368,0.00009508767,0.0046067163,0.00030450115,0.70392853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536688,0.010873942,0.0043510636,0.0013639674,0.00006706954,0.000060587536,0.00065762765,0.00011230491,0.028844723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956256,0.00067403214,0.00008582582,0.0004434784,0.0018851086,0.0012859087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481,0.0010899954,0.0004459789,0.00028299954,0.002298889,0.0010720589],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027843057,0.0004531205,0.00054688886,0.012559057,0.016967183,0.018343603,0.0012225984,0.0009482593,0.009100212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004235678,0.00027532293,0.00038029888,0.034940016,0.012722175,0.0031324925,0.004864233,0.0015579135,0.00051851297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105703904,0.000017385322,0.03263957,0.000612269,0.00007550154,0.0009862083,0.15159716,0.002320028,0.0023408146,0.64551586,0.047999043,0.115790434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012718163,0.0000233596,0.08002995,0.0007985215,0.00008979124,0.00041885092,0.14765708,0.0011719012,0.000564979,0.02999837,0.739127,0.000107472086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114968784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16311184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8341608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593004197","doi":"10.1101/108357","title":"The Rise of the Middle Author: Investigating Collaboration and Division of Labor in Biomedical Research using Partial Alphabetical Authorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Period (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5333238123347174,"score_gpt":0.5116136643576324,"score_spread":0.021710147977084926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593004197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97217417,0.0032008903,0.007628858,0.0034048369,0.00022934818,0.000064483414,0.0007543072,0.000032850272,0.012510229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.00027173627,0.0012246269,0.0001123544,0.000077041885,0.000035923877,0.00012748953,0.000012464015,0.0004353969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96331316,0.019883322,0.0054857675,0.0034623733,0.0059461696,0.001909279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47515196,0.34490997,0.13278705,0.014935765,0.017155962,0.015059328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029133508,0.0003096847,0.0006004288,0.0075897654,0.0029292349,0.0063489825,0.0016475697,0.0013317233,0.008688167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2653119,0.0002941705,0.000476569,0.012972108,0.0030522442,0.0060070427,0.0061468133,0.0013414851,0.001302023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047225092,0.0000747124,0.938608,0.00037242196,0.00008738855,0.0004550776,0.024159655,0.00027584584,0.00031075437,0.0053870524,0.0017426424,0.028054195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011058797,0.00035459246,0.83970916,0.0018682467,0.00027242946,0.0023598098,0.09886437,0.0042067952,0.001658293,0.033099223,0.01739563,0.000100869496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026057544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00264884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99241024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001769107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035092367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15407461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593988437","doi":"10.2196/jmir.6250","title":"Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary; Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple sclerosis; Demyelinating disease; Medicine; Public health; Family medicine; Gerontology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.9941987440381901,"score_gpt":0.8009483234132166,"score_spread":0.19325042062497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593988437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007778601,0.98477006,0.000082911305,0.009987003,0.0005485376,0.000030345329,0.00017059752,0.000007798731,0.0036250195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01030131,0.9875377,0.0003496745,0.0011881592,0.00019301275,0.000023682505,0.000089877394,0.000009406758,0.00030723072],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760549,0.0036026465,0.003908594,0.0012678945,0.013358031,0.0018079897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8056512,0.07697761,0.017981505,0.0021722736,0.085476324,0.011741123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030097198,0.0011238273,0.0021748224,0.029725363,0.0071271425,0.010378108,0.0032651376,0.0032943683,0.007861619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09551016,0.0009272237,0.0014716687,0.06945241,0.005916813,0.0046638763,0.0037807545,0.0027772116,0.0006189635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022733133,0.00006861686,0.011099244,0.1400323,0.00046671036,0.0009405079,0.008559879,0.00027911318,0.00035727862,0.022809364,0.0975571,0.7176025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059254846,0.00005958755,0.045431245,0.17280306,0.0009751253,0.0012723987,0.008277647,0.00017128586,0.00020921997,0.0024416442,0.7681316,0.0001679415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8692414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.922435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99673486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08170603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28997865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59282154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594847254","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019","title":"The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Process (computing); Phenomenon; Position paper; Peer review; Data science; Position (finance); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Business; World Wide Web; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7050554478074119,"score_gpt":0.671148843316608,"score_spread":0.03390660449080396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594847254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010894533,0.0024662726,0.013073379,0.5667472,0.37615064,0.00056508824,0.0009166387,0.010986737,0.028004652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014204397,0.004093041,0.031430587,0.25019205,0.20950575,0.0017737868,0.0023513988,0.011103913,0.4753451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.820235,0.045060463,0.0141243795,0.009944682,0.099681266,0.0109542515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23148386,0.09636892,0.035363782,0.103327945,0.4658313,0.067624226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1277017,0.0029362373,0.006846144,0.010062462,0.014261708,0.049729895,0.0063938466,0.02689048,0.2194224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5280192,0.0030704164,0.0042780256,0.0059223236,0.012338564,0.025396043,0.012615697,0.03644988,0.46700343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005356385,0.000046039582,0.0002759584,0.000115838244,0.000017937538,0.000057241858,0.00010835231,0.000022131153,0.00043230268,0.001461709,0.9806589,0.016749986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076376135,0.000071438015,0.0017417595,0.00031235054,0.00002929278,0.00022728235,0.00047166226,0.00033146204,0.00038430438,0.006782868,0.9894022,0.00016910658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004443226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009406896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005798979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035694584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7340411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597082463","doi":"10.3390/publications5010005","title":"Accountability and High Impact Journals in the Health Sciences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Citation; Impact factor; Relevance (law); Political science; Norm (philosophy); Public relations; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8430800737748104,"score_gpt":0.7174718517387156,"score_spread":0.12560822203609479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597082463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70018286,0.02587975,0.017395545,0.04753225,0.001676847,0.0005061698,0.0025080761,0.0003593686,0.20395918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921023,0.0016969437,0.0017611798,0.0010457458,0.00083836407,0.00009041907,0.00037655898,0.000032346128,0.0020561412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89459056,0.0413861,0.009818148,0.004910106,0.044309687,0.004985396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4887602,0.2951944,0.14942771,0.021138513,0.032145824,0.013333337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05365758,0.00036275742,0.0012825185,0.025788998,0.005232099,0.015122708,0.0012922998,0.0019985456,0.0075206924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2804943,0.00041617497,0.0006245099,0.057444435,0.010545482,0.0077174893,0.008923862,0.0020086563,0.0009369981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005449634,0.0003994468,0.62724465,0.0020134181,0.0003788592,0.00074813404,0.016140645,0.0020912539,0.0012065074,0.18768078,0.013315327,0.148236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012407056,0.00022699342,0.71365047,0.00085042976,0.0002019239,0.0013348417,0.010948076,0.0022960936,0.0018740144,0.2005505,0.067827284,0.00011533324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004240232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00456767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065678577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01022602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28377175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597139062","doi":"10.1177/2325967117694024","title":"The h-Index of Editorial Board Members Correlates Positively With the Impact Factor of Sports Medicine Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Editorial board; Medicine; Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Interquartile range; Library science; Statistics; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18094606262248883,"score_gpt":0.49283091591464406,"score_spread":0.3118848532921552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597139062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6169239,0.3500833,0.0039672186,0.005431302,0.0027078472,0.000738746,0.0065536182,0.00027843766,0.013315576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95467454,0.03525309,0.0039774287,0.0006078053,0.0029710536,0.00028386514,0.0014515085,0.000042619846,0.00073810754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97098273,0.0074290545,0.0075493236,0.0022901185,0.01116476,0.0005840074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6216986,0.1871333,0.14331554,0.0056551313,0.03525288,0.0069444864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022346394,0.0005908267,0.001829932,0.015458436,0.0008363708,0.0040531694,0.0010855297,0.00082854007,0.003400668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1504224,0.0004840636,0.0023718115,0.0134492945,0.0012146108,0.0028103294,0.0010907084,0.000730512,0.0005284262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083644304,0.00016280895,0.838463,0.025825353,0.008716531,0.0002354781,0.001182381,0.00027958676,0.0007885957,0.00027703005,0.007330975,0.11590172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017566241,0.0004121529,0.9717771,0.007552254,0.0059501226,0.0008528482,0.0012876795,0.00054976705,0.00067430537,0.00068343675,0.010018254,0.00006643142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012385348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98454154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010240483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033916929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118180454},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2597934390","doi":"10.3138/topia.36.173","title":"The Organized Response to the “War on Science” and the Lost Potential for Challenging Commercialization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.4042814184711806,"score_gpt":0.5199030871833054,"score_spread":0.11562166871212476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597934390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1271352,0.003305658,0.009226488,0.6211495,0.0020058723,0.00009526837,0.00012175567,0.00010361997,0.23685674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334466,0.0008743144,0.0014270103,0.042463005,0.00047764726,0.00005466175,0.00003007883,0.000102959355,0.021123908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97224265,0.011095668,0.00046670975,0.0021674451,0.009103807,0.004923621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96078116,0.020598913,0.0027825348,0.0029611853,0.008198879,0.0046773804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02537926,0.0005330774,0.0004926712,0.0024479448,0.030350799,0.0200888,0.002685766,0.009859362,0.004743995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044334035,0.00046860764,0.00071828265,0.0040601627,0.07084247,0.006485378,0.009567466,0.01779552,0.00054165424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004175087,0.000019281257,0.001036232,0.00006492864,0.000021487429,0.0003992075,0.07747003,0.00027120346,0.0005779853,0.86739326,0.04266664,0.010037984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004970509,0.00004050046,0.003312215,0.0003156567,0.000019590048,0.00020852436,0.10193649,0.00062759314,0.0011013913,0.15926102,0.7330066,0.00012082086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38490865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38606545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050485216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06523228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76533645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598028339","doi":"10.1055/s-0037-1600093","title":"The Importance of Facts and the Role of Academic Publishers in Today's World—A Publisher's View","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current research. Concussion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Process (computing); Political science; Peer review; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5386139029589161,"score_gpt":0.5980958235861853,"score_spread":0.0594819206272692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598028339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039009496,0.104433596,0.0017462646,0.790568,0.04590506,0.000027828772,0.0001753269,0.00012795375,0.053114995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20685923,0.34055853,0.009782433,0.25892848,0.14013398,0.0001350877,0.00038845476,0.00027433663,0.042939488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97535455,0.00883517,0.0027350122,0.0019974876,0.00967348,0.0014042686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76862127,0.16965571,0.015866227,0.009287509,0.027601533,0.008967788],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044833403,0.00065558136,0.0014973704,0.0075314566,0.00903142,0.08352418,0.002864394,0.009933253,0.0066962945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11923688,0.00085080194,0.000680867,0.016755769,0.024275443,0.068145946,0.0074228584,0.011189094,0.0023193758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000685271,0.00005485468,0.0030783676,0.0016637071,0.000059752278,0.00045352112,0.011964301,0.00014174644,0.00021328477,0.5874082,0.29551703,0.09937678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014787906,0.000020755204,0.0016773562,0.001047298,0.000040824718,0.00027906641,0.008801782,0.0001098871,0.0001403491,0.14226903,0.8455508,0.0000481175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027698118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044914093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91647583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006411037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017244603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23710454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600626313","doi":"","title":"Editorial: The Journey to Publication and Support for the Peer-Review Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Process (computing); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6488343976818888,"score_gpt":0.6616819468873805,"score_spread":0.012847549205491693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600626313","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031392283,0.0019589132,0.00011918184,0.030357404,0.9668657,0.000019018495,0.00002961907,0.000043382166,0.00057541876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051256537,0.0023904217,0.00020850086,0.008765854,0.98254126,0.000028734903,0.000028579941,0.00004966196,0.00547441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9496196,0.0088743875,0.007030144,0.003918522,0.027940614,0.0026166413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7341562,0.06841528,0.013254503,0.0072649256,0.14428745,0.03262166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037146267,0.0052369484,0.0075076846,0.010452758,0.008584974,0.0266796,0.0072813565,0.027404437,0.018429276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1584728,0.0021073401,0.003949543,0.004532808,0.006507296,0.00921974,0.003262152,0.024944242,0.012874172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039416416,0.000023165376,0.000044365534,0.00026454087,0.000024703666,0.000112290036,0.00002201376,0.000027290018,0.000045362354,0.00038869178,0.99485946,0.0041487254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012600404,0.0000444569,0.00064649293,0.0011112641,0.00009575914,0.00039359578,0.00016869295,0.0004161488,0.00018835344,0.002488736,0.9942584,0.00006223713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044790134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016474672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010557221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02042792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19645059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600769155","doi":"","title":"Canada-China SCI and SSCI Co-authorship 1982-2012: Examining Fields, Networks and Institutional Collaborations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Field (mathematics); Regional science; Economic geography; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.4663924248661179,"score_gpt":0.49831502174342784,"score_spread":0.03192259687730992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600769155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170788,0.005514384,0.00050795457,0.0037735866,0.00017754566,0.000058868653,0.040199563,0.00009501739,0.032594208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779919,0.0012388956,0.00030077298,0.00013045817,0.000037061654,0.000026978285,0.00784897,0.000018751616,0.012406255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986766,0.00007651,0.00008131021,0.00013818782,0.0005819489,0.0004454317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98645175,0.0010297801,0.0019829967,0.0003096756,0.0074368767,0.0027888967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015808083,0.00037043958,0.00073314866,0.010772268,0.003238268,0.0031776603,0.0009850356,0.00044039634,0.0061729657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008999698,0.00016755766,0.00057986594,0.035268538,0.0008967295,0.0011580223,0.0016762074,0.00066903385,0.0006839341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022646559,0.000049893944,0.9398255,0.00019341908,0.00020601334,0.00023040776,0.0025064112,0.0009822344,0.00016594701,0.0050713867,0.018870967,0.03167137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015015813,0.000017320748,0.9793793,0.000057498895,0.00007902013,0.0000321359,0.0037019711,0.00068345567,0.00017353843,0.0002533585,0.015591412,0.000016018936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99841917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03766281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111077085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602217918","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2017.03.104","title":"The Downside of the Shifting Paradigm of Scholarly Publishing in the Biomedical Sciences: Predatory Publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.1984503874392376,"score_gpt":0.4300402212220412,"score_spread":0.23158983378280362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602217918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019278154,0.021887992,0.0066469396,0.8896888,0.014813345,0.000050883278,0.00011739063,0.00035596453,0.06451088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23532264,0.06690125,0.024372779,0.47988528,0.10466147,0.0007538258,0.0002761396,0.0026856668,0.08514092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90609086,0.03954597,0.0047501684,0.00875959,0.037994135,0.0028593412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7410549,0.15299234,0.013024434,0.035882585,0.043804914,0.013240888],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07612121,0.00092083775,0.0016484625,0.008884379,0.014313371,0.044327226,0.004066805,0.01708591,0.015608992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17391121,0.001107128,0.0011767833,0.0080481265,0.087730415,0.06395187,0.017847534,0.028289357,0.013420841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041654534,0.00001603885,0.00028275608,0.00038060642,0.000014829665,0.000091005204,0.0069926195,0.00006562496,0.000096146876,0.7456118,0.21659566,0.029811364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003499479,0.00002608135,0.00032363005,0.0011748847,0.000011281798,0.00032903638,0.003381249,0.00020428942,0.00013268313,0.2907914,0.7035495,0.00004086957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006878652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008016619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137236295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027438663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40257227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604604230","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2017.207","title":"Knowledge of journal impact factors among nursing faculty: a cross-sectional study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Polytechnic; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education","score_opus":0.4601951043661614,"score_gpt":0.6171331434327474,"score_spread":0.156938039066586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604604230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926084,0.000094636074,0.00006182531,0.00006476667,0.0000030992971,0.000032688633,0.000098604716,0.0000017589476,0.0003817518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991328,0.00018826978,0.00013965255,0.00011128275,0.000007751482,0.000064130385,0.000103204955,0.0000016193583,0.0002512823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974063,0.0007753049,0.00043265888,0.0001976328,0.0008765893,0.000311519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97867715,0.009724584,0.005408212,0.0005939201,0.0036233575,0.001972811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055675376,0.00014882344,0.0005410861,0.0024481798,0.0010899465,0.0013864957,0.0003414371,0.00054639415,0.0031378132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017037481,0.00045009566,0.00035823867,0.0026435517,0.0006719915,0.0017309479,0.00085990824,0.00070304686,0.00063955155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045717377,0.0003377693,0.9927598,0.00004250066,0.000018466577,0.00004786126,0.0034757834,0.000011268289,0.00013082975,0.000013191415,0.000087581655,0.0030291625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001027959,0.000754343,0.981616,0.000054747285,0.000025190946,0.00021842078,0.016472861,0.000088273206,0.00020711697,0.00003770492,0.00050306035,0.000012015905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004363689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052194744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009470202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018190597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029444277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604895157","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2104","title":"Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Commercialization; Vagueness; Public administration; Freedom of information; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.9468948604005198,"score_gpt":0.6709462950792823,"score_spread":0.27594856532123757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604895157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15466614,0.01891942,0.10078379,0.26873186,0.00077542634,0.0002742198,0.00014068307,0.000090631154,0.45561785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979654,0.0031796058,0.008153084,0.004500092,0.0002800444,0.00016037871,0.00003760039,0.00003931921,0.003995899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8963611,0.075101435,0.0042379857,0.004427065,0.013225317,0.0066471775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7186615,0.22605614,0.024004377,0.011990136,0.0113445865,0.007943288],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08730991,0.00065247196,0.0012363525,0.008426533,0.015931878,0.044118363,0.0037486549,0.01028782,0.0072767213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16640548,0.00094975857,0.0009771995,0.010307649,0.087193474,0.052615628,0.027828384,0.011352233,0.00058361853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011929608,0.000023358041,0.0017420438,0.000091984424,0.000011092112,0.00010166379,0.019461637,0.00032906557,0.00004631615,0.9677728,0.0009046982,0.009503612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012682184,0.00001251587,0.0009285186,0.0004632213,0.000010210558,0.00009412847,0.03368187,0.0007927277,0.0001378315,0.9263107,0.03752806,0.000027502805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008899692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006053289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99625134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023111619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03163508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4617445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605532224","doi":"10.1007/s40596-016-0656-2","title":"Academic Productivity in Psychiatry: Benchmarks for the H-Index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Psychiatry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Context (archaeology); Benchmarking; Index (typography); Promotion (chess); Citation; Psychology; Productivity; Rank (graph theory); Medical education; Library science; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Management; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4300700536348611,"score_gpt":0.5780992450496059,"score_spread":0.14802919141474474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605532224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7274596,0.01951196,0.031865846,0.018169373,0.001800993,0.0005994731,0.02474169,0.0017816845,0.17406929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98261595,0.0011403217,0.008541862,0.00027200452,0.00066894345,0.00016979357,0.0050297785,0.0000756907,0.0014856602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088913,0.0021568795,0.0011060624,0.00055959227,0.0047314814,0.0005568328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602517,0.012262891,0.006165463,0.0028023964,0.012850095,0.005667438],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010747648,0.00075445056,0.0016170602,0.012409869,0.001381514,0.0046222946,0.0021131176,0.0015321596,0.0034644967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054671958,0.00016513914,0.0011852974,0.013793854,0.0014092429,0.0031901407,0.004045777,0.001396955,0.0018605049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012365098,0.0007943905,0.625559,0.00081690284,0.0006150221,0.00020285782,0.0013850612,0.009036751,0.0007708567,0.017740626,0.040659163,0.30118293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016123729,0.0012952056,0.9346753,0.0003030225,0.0002060778,0.0005716832,0.0030830384,0.01479718,0.0018053304,0.021591226,0.021421358,0.000089361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011926114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009022935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004339023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064937277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056839645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605809407","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.004","title":"Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Florida State University; City University of New York; University of Florida; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reputation; Negotiation; Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8869103465194283,"score_gpt":0.6618444333474954,"score_spread":0.22506591317193292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605809407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101352,0.0007398114,0.07847898,0.001999887,0.00007643594,0.00027240472,0.0006729607,0.000099382654,0.0075249304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056054,0.0000641378,0.01851509,0.00004898845,0.000033614633,0.00013147175,0.00024498292,0.000013480449,0.00038765123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.877687,0.08903983,0.010163117,0.00833041,0.010755049,0.004024621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3370075,0.5399969,0.048030373,0.033895858,0.035335608,0.005733752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1375858,0.0006443611,0.0015362457,0.009453777,0.003944826,0.011116204,0.002466177,0.0024307359,0.0028157374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48112613,0.00069254433,0.0016707693,0.010772753,0.003089752,0.009252107,0.008499838,0.0022372345,0.0006042321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004969492,0.00020956878,0.9122126,0.00020511982,0.00039450687,0.00016769867,0.006664759,0.002208806,0.00076748215,0.014978984,0.0010002707,0.0606933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545919,0.0008350051,0.5557952,0.0009997373,0.0019937328,0.0014359566,0.040893704,0.17631589,0.016851248,0.19163205,0.012415412,0.0002775171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045331996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041634184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99756926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019585039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008105774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.727632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606235571","doi":"10.1186/s13742-016-0147-0-f","title":"Automatic extraction of academic collaborations in neuroimaging","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GigaScience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Computer science; Extraction (chemistry); Data science; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Chemistry; Psychology; Chromatography","score_opus":0.5944381460399508,"score_gpt":0.6029800787514076,"score_spread":0.008541932711456757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606235571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66995496,0.019914078,0.1547754,0.0028616623,0.0008464182,0.0007257063,0.112673014,0.0056789345,0.03256983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536986,0.0028419746,0.09801625,0.00013575457,0.0007364161,0.00082312815,0.03917114,0.0002802746,0.004296479],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982494,0.00029213054,0.00023260932,0.00054881384,0.00046124207,0.0002158146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941732,0.0019134298,0.0014366799,0.00061949086,0.0014314705,0.00042583194],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017658973,0.0007830701,0.00096429675,0.023014074,0.0010304408,0.0022957711,0.0012190017,0.0012166365,0.0034692662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011664302,0.00028664575,0.0011400378,0.022513818,0.00039771816,0.0015356746,0.001818151,0.0005703611,0.0022943409],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010370852,0.00032019548,0.23341621,0.0033584745,0.0013250582,0.002138603,0.0017400453,0.0049646776,0.045786195,0.0116328895,0.05970527,0.6345755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018471222,0.0002291269,0.71448696,0.00078946695,0.0016681995,0.00550005,0.0031385536,0.08288598,0.024633441,0.049524404,0.11673016,0.0002289194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068281903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016564887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97698593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068664603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002527999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013576865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606504748","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.009","title":"The emerging landscape of scientific publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Phenomenon; Data science; Process (computing); Position (finance); Scientific literature; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Business; Biology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.8899480221028856,"score_gpt":0.7157399398234091,"score_spread":0.17420808227947648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606504748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011885533,0.9946233,0.00015805365,0.0037777082,0.0005411874,0.0000031993213,0.000020723588,0.00000676976,0.0007502445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020502056,0.9945527,0.00040686585,0.0013946877,0.0014008881,0.000007548682,0.000027124803,0.000002612798,0.00015732781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389815,0.0021083634,0.0008873482,0.00059812097,0.0022595539,0.00024848952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95400316,0.035925522,0.0035812526,0.0006613961,0.004809029,0.0010196213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009884306,0.0010537795,0.0022829345,0.017396307,0.0010368011,0.009010945,0.0016571624,0.0041778237,0.0044153864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026251188,0.00059759215,0.0010417149,0.02602442,0.0042449357,0.011356032,0.003019011,0.0038429454,0.0010262242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007982221,0.00004041179,0.0010867303,0.050156027,0.00024383285,0.00023039244,0.00043234567,0.00026514544,0.00033557726,0.028106183,0.034140497,0.88488305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025154366,0.0000635824,0.0040456406,0.0580538,0.00049336243,0.0012643399,0.0011976828,0.00028678396,0.00022761594,0.033644322,0.90063405,0.00006367136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031609326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008379229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039157905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015226132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05227387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606849632","doi":"10.3390/data2020013","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges (OA APC) Longitudinal Study 2016 Dataset","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Subject (documents); Computer science; Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Business model; World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; Accounting; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.955974598263469,"score_gpt":0.7534249884478179,"score_spread":0.20254960981565107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606849632","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002354204,0.00008682767,0.00014872302,0.00021930215,0.00003836506,0.000054393226,0.99485224,0.00010215805,0.0021438142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062795123,0.000117730066,0.0005294502,0.00013370943,0.00005725194,0.00033533954,0.9889043,0.000059190832,0.0035834783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960043,0.00061838736,0.0008690596,0.00055675645,0.0014627186,0.000488874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756501,0.0047134827,0.007446772,0.0029660277,0.007563919,0.0016598445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028950886,0.00068029336,0.0008592755,0.0069538215,0.00077966915,0.0024206373,0.0015694347,0.0009901894,0.04892219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02835548,0.00042778085,0.00068696187,0.015475543,0.0002964649,0.0012377729,0.0018803765,0.0014579862,0.03536758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016668673,0.00006931163,0.019762412,0.00044978256,0.000054955497,0.000058770078,0.00011407739,0.00017589901,0.00015187019,0.0017121697,0.96961683,0.007667213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022681268,0.000052035095,0.07459038,0.0003958389,0.00006074753,0.00018554418,0.00039311877,0.0004285778,0.00041777873,0.0015556003,0.9216404,0.000053139833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023278775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034699924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001826314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004180729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.163661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607340169","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916001086","title":"Journal Publishing and Marketing in an Age of Digital Media, Open Access and Impact Factors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publicity; Impact factor; Political science; Public relations; Politics; Position (finance); Bibliometrics; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6632481603766792,"score_gpt":0.6183906463759615,"score_spread":0.04485751400071769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607340169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42587724,0.033482593,0.002247269,0.24996611,0.0030301688,0.00009956768,0.00019949584,0.0001464244,0.28495115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732517,0.009589882,0.0009956586,0.006326184,0.0019850838,0.000024661122,0.00003234553,0.000039069404,0.0077553983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801221,0.007553087,0.0007532014,0.00083457393,0.008954974,0.0017821392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92652,0.042575926,0.009452111,0.00209391,0.009546179,0.009811951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016906224,0.00028211423,0.00070715393,0.006217561,0.0152629055,0.041040603,0.0009827014,0.0024006595,0.006309711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038503017,0.00029704458,0.00027150512,0.013209074,0.024145186,0.01716418,0.0062675704,0.0031176675,0.0005733324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028030854,0.00028878232,0.095883936,0.0009297733,0.000082146755,0.0024907275,0.2974785,0.00021383725,0.0023962103,0.35947552,0.059561305,0.18091896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040714393,0.00014058533,0.08757308,0.00073738134,0.000043560278,0.0013838353,0.36474863,0.0002489691,0.0008923059,0.059694324,0.4843645,0.00013208509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049810987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106793076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99378246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021577334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1305117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607898736","doi":"10.29173/cjs28140","title":"Future Challenges and Opportunities in Academic Publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Digitization; Scientific communication; Public relations; Sociology; Electronic publishing; Open access publishing; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.8451116580711818,"score_gpt":0.5671079614588102,"score_spread":0.2780036966123717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607898736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009500709,0.053907044,0.003855529,0.8726911,0.0045478474,0.000045997887,0.00015647375,0.00014680756,0.05514855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5011171,0.25931203,0.04352202,0.102626905,0.029659836,0.0005331158,0.0008271732,0.00033088663,0.06207096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96397394,0.012001019,0.0027128279,0.0028293072,0.014199324,0.0042836657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88990086,0.04483356,0.0073058195,0.0049378285,0.030606387,0.022415467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045296643,0.00048060427,0.0012716285,0.003910898,0.011833317,0.040560026,0.0049528973,0.013476997,0.019957354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05787781,0.00047433606,0.0012314245,0.011079509,0.016705956,0.03479373,0.008153475,0.008740082,0.0053690937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112556045,0.00015857484,0.0030855332,0.0011602994,0.000025541425,0.000565643,0.005490338,0.0006676138,0.00035973205,0.75925297,0.081841074,0.14728011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028464265,0.000071077615,0.0020143343,0.0008789223,0.000014544433,0.00061167614,0.018067239,0.00072315894,0.00022891899,0.39087346,0.5864092,0.000079057754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008247198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012124069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013337585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048796788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2395544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608217342","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.02.746","title":"1019. The Association between Scholarly Impact and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding in Psychiatry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Psychiatry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Productivity; Procurement; Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Management; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8451718606742203,"score_gpt":0.6531907697458212,"score_spread":0.1919810909283991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608217342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53208435,0.035921272,0.0012292339,0.075439736,0.002692218,0.00018549369,0.11774008,0.00030233932,0.2344052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554516,0.0061986865,0.00081382855,0.0015737896,0.00060463895,0.000042158037,0.015757082,0.00004205484,0.019516058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955043,0.0005255766,0.00026114978,0.00024357253,0.0028652668,0.00060004636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580433,0.008051264,0.005142257,0.0010344014,0.021710983,0.0060178097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049443576,0.00034773778,0.0004862012,0.012301725,0.0031585626,0.002675467,0.0013307185,0.00085620413,0.021468213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04981954,0.00024689626,0.0008472786,0.026947305,0.0011280983,0.000980912,0.0015642748,0.0011232595,0.0018910042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018357323,0.00007707872,0.8265218,0.0006143368,0.0005207795,0.00010168387,0.0006433321,0.00050883647,0.00010393394,0.0065258034,0.10131573,0.062883034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018362816,0.000009500963,0.9778781,0.00011864629,0.00014758729,0.00005235421,0.00042325645,0.00028791965,0.000055410615,0.0006668602,0.02032828,0.000013669152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9514139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96969193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018446669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0425367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13384056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612064989","doi":"10.1186/s40634-017-0090-8","title":"The rate of publication of free papers at the 2008 and 2010 European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congresses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre; McGill University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Medicine; Impact factor; Sports medicine; Presentation (obstetrics); Arthroscopy; MEDLINE; Observational study; Orthopedic surgery; General surgery; Physical therapy; Surgery; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.25898981263820664,"score_gpt":0.4708629947709106,"score_spread":0.21187318213270395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612064989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38349807,0.5714612,0.0026814153,0.009518167,0.00613637,0.0014772638,0.012714235,0.00029762436,0.012215674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81596607,0.15310465,0.0042098654,0.0030168176,0.0070326705,0.0021512266,0.009434621,0.00026429,0.0048197256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8384526,0.04161587,0.054863818,0.00769899,0.05462003,0.0027488244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34108844,0.31664768,0.2514171,0.017306104,0.058113035,0.015427679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.121564105,0.0014238546,0.004222361,0.047922038,0.0015363144,0.011039185,0.0038045775,0.0034168474,0.010020739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40615183,0.00080877385,0.0047432114,0.035774715,0.0017271126,0.0074909646,0.0058413013,0.001929875,0.0023461874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055586803,0.0005039223,0.5742373,0.06516968,0.011651204,0.004449831,0.007541446,0.0005347986,0.0024914567,0.001637447,0.035781346,0.290443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008756117,0.0018269505,0.8755684,0.020642618,0.0045246314,0.015616472,0.0051468224,0.00042016455,0.0015957848,0.0016559123,0.07176262,0.0003641027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000865604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008794356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036022163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044737495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6429001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612430136","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300","title":"Citation analysis of scientific categories","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics; Data science; Management science; Computer science; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6441124752737633,"score_gpt":0.5944176859984289,"score_spread":0.04969478927533433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612430136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32663727,0.040267143,0.05223356,0.0018747835,0.0014203216,0.003302679,0.32146025,0.0054163416,0.24738778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72952825,0.012011288,0.06289637,0.00028114804,0.0008647384,0.004087619,0.16618101,0.0008872914,0.023262326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820588,0.003217982,0.0033012682,0.0016488736,0.00894288,0.0008301746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313145,0.029217595,0.009204164,0.0051342826,0.023667157,0.001462245],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008755297,0.0009978737,0.0019449661,0.16141069,0.0018956753,0.0059419284,0.001675699,0.00084025064,0.014743513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07225358,0.00026886194,0.0019821452,0.1788997,0.0009069934,0.0030223916,0.002680134,0.0006557829,0.0049024113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055701163,0.00021719832,0.20159252,0.008596003,0.0016481235,0.00030073695,0.003719009,0.0046120435,0.0023592399,0.060147393,0.07866845,0.6375823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011436101,0.00036655445,0.3787044,0.0018778311,0.0009598892,0.0011658788,0.0046168766,0.015796911,0.0040068817,0.063222684,0.5289017,0.00026598648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082258135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049507404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8385893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029836914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00454183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04932195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612545723","doi":"10.18520/cs/v106/i11/1490-1499","title":"Global Research Output of Nanobiotechnology Research: a Scientometrics Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Scopus; Index (typography); Citation impact; Nanobiotechnology; Bibliometrics; China; Library science; Regional science; Citation; Political science; Geography; Social science; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.917201976812686,"score_gpt":0.7366759240880296,"score_spread":0.18052605272465638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612545723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242577,0.009114034,0.0032708766,0.001382653,0.000121515215,0.00026882847,0.024212696,0.00028349087,0.037088223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97869706,0.0046861423,0.0018759394,0.00007393047,0.00023494,0.00021550857,0.012518423,0.00007182458,0.0016263152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934582,0.000752941,0.0012129431,0.00051757804,0.003530404,0.00052793487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809591,0.0072160335,0.0056425156,0.0009344022,0.0044691344,0.0007786857],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067366892,0.0008232606,0.0013445881,0.07023641,0.00075290824,0.0050036157,0.0005970761,0.0005398294,0.002314124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022519343,0.0001967375,0.0019279316,0.16407864,0.0008214348,0.0041360655,0.0021089863,0.00042897652,0.000704062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017389828,0.00015914367,0.8260945,0.0027706528,0.0011486079,0.00064518256,0.0033863792,0.003928353,0.0010221412,0.0040527163,0.0063525173,0.15026586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014390774,0.00016671611,0.9721852,0.0003575756,0.00034375428,0.00046562546,0.0039184587,0.0032796965,0.0009493687,0.0015458112,0.016727736,0.000045613957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030322804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022555476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020081142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024522848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035627484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613650556","doi":"10.1002/asi.23903","title":"Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gratitude; Value (mathematics); Scopus; Context (archaeology); Scientific communication; Data science; Coding (social sciences); Scientific literature; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Political science; History; Psychology; MEDLINE; Social psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.5109254855075547,"score_gpt":0.5932061808176325,"score_spread":0.08228069531007787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613650556","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035013065,0.9329951,0.012060605,0.00954274,0.0019030055,0.0010040575,0.0026535266,0.00009024564,0.004737642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35822988,0.60504365,0.02544669,0.004246661,0.00076338346,0.0031806717,0.0021742613,0.00015543259,0.0007594329],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480467,0.033399105,0.009618384,0.0033407363,0.0048205666,0.00077459216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7552206,0.21154352,0.011583664,0.008248949,0.012347397,0.001055937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083707266,0.0013247883,0.0040285843,0.031812362,0.0014686553,0.008169224,0.0019553485,0.0016702699,0.003232712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20994815,0.0011784541,0.0052498467,0.026589407,0.0027568713,0.009727672,0.0052791922,0.0028594176,0.00026915845],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010197684,0.00011955359,0.013539865,0.4824137,0.04660915,0.00038384105,0.077825256,0.0013909327,0.0010228549,0.038935676,0.010449646,0.3262898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016960617,0.0004630414,0.021533245,0.6766792,0.05944355,0.0003878871,0.052656665,0.0008786202,0.0011515953,0.030909447,0.15551642,0.00021072308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003439962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007607331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96818763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077731404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016269682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44269162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614250894","doi":"10.1017/cem.2017.292","title":"P090: Electronic invitations received from predatory journals and fraudulent conferences: a 6-month young researcher experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7878409052410476,"score_gpt":0.6192272024603012,"score_spread":0.1686137027807464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614250894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9263334,0.001371093,0.0023985624,0.03800017,0.0047313874,0.0013084644,0.0007932826,0.0005437928,0.024519902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8786666,0.0019709293,0.0048443493,0.021703409,0.003549751,0.0018392995,0.0008386705,0.00076222845,0.08582476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896456,0.0059774825,0.0005620932,0.00057535974,0.0014014334,0.001837981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9075351,0.019776309,0.003540818,0.001709177,0.010230289,0.05720829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023104401,0.00077041175,0.0009855626,0.002107299,0.017486095,0.008881188,0.0020694684,0.0044168537,0.025494274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055162396,0.0010062702,0.0008258046,0.0015718881,0.0029394834,0.0048310007,0.012946045,0.0042300206,0.010892541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011583215,0.00748985,0.11945236,0.00060990645,0.0001059964,0.013571306,0.57096976,0.00009329525,0.004496632,0.0012570177,0.15194759,0.12884802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002545591,0.0037337758,0.06811589,0.00033739526,0.0000497603,0.0032971941,0.74330044,0.00024124996,0.0011585433,0.00071731815,0.17863199,0.00016187229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032958118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009153127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023504267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007820064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122189224},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2615266562","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/nox053","title":"Citation classics in neuro-oncology: assessment of historical trends and scientific progress","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuro-Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Oncology; Radiation therapy; Clinical trial; Citation analysis; MEDLINE; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4991945846804617,"score_gpt":0.58779065215596,"score_spread":0.08859606747549836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615266562","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082110204,0.8571175,0.0064864554,0.015371583,0.0045597865,0.0010039081,0.016055303,0.00045482643,0.016840475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41733202,0.5207122,0.03069184,0.0025912274,0.0085213855,0.0015670798,0.014910161,0.0002742308,0.0033999265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625931,0.0073040216,0.012329852,0.0031325414,0.013604369,0.0010359775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59150326,0.22558638,0.093690455,0.0072767097,0.07696163,0.0049814736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058545303,0.0012192386,0.0025348426,0.16748728,0.0018694291,0.01249397,0.0022933816,0.0019525887,0.0048620477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24817175,0.0007061825,0.0023437198,0.18984488,0.0026964354,0.012837295,0.003949128,0.0015776752,0.0010887345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009657723,0.00010284235,0.1872529,0.104182616,0.0039555733,0.0008092395,0.0072852997,0.0014516215,0.0013506872,0.020111682,0.06309938,0.6094325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023715406,0.00071336684,0.37490374,0.07919325,0.007242443,0.0060864803,0.011773485,0.0037709766,0.0021816497,0.03386148,0.47951305,0.0005229696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029878318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006386069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009121762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30962086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615456822","doi":"10.29173/cais937","title":"Forty-Six Years Young: A Checkup for the Canadian Association for Information Science","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Library science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.17905958010432857,"score_gpt":0.4138772447122529,"score_spread":0.23481766460792433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615456822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8246558,0.010906908,0.00044842463,0.05833701,0.0013717429,0.0011125517,0.026002524,0.0001137722,0.07705124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098223,0.01575123,0.001935559,0.014099828,0.00046754218,0.0009388573,0.010729643,0.000110976995,0.046144012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346584,0.0003256815,0.00033429815,0.00023686556,0.004334476,0.0013028824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603791,0.0024750223,0.003897282,0.0006936283,0.020974651,0.011580256],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055222004,0.00023399811,0.00039809142,0.008267289,0.010312091,0.0025240784,0.0013389233,0.0009072648,0.00930282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022077238,0.0004520133,0.0004370123,0.010351085,0.0013044638,0.0017464551,0.0025825263,0.0025849077,0.0017298327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076357275,0.00015570511,0.7655175,0.0004179218,0.000034078326,0.0010622729,0.043829966,0.000044295026,0.0006293129,0.0016107159,0.12564392,0.060978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006026851,0.000051519844,0.7830992,0.0002923849,0.000014753197,0.00025737283,0.05169191,0.000051924715,0.00009966318,0.00010990901,0.16426696,0.000058393387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9014039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9492334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018656945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07190512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19835347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615767977","doi":"10.1111/jan.13338","title":"Research publication performance of Australian Professors of Nursing &amp; Midwifery","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Nursing research; Excellence; Watson; Discipline; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Nursing; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Medical education; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.6841241292454829,"score_gpt":0.6721515447596926,"score_spread":0.011972584485790305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615767977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82922447,0.05723734,0.0016538777,0.018011479,0.0023688287,0.0003651055,0.011374575,0.00034630054,0.07941799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469266,0.017646847,0.0023006822,0.0013392498,0.0017759418,0.0003197462,0.00577397,0.00016294183,0.023753852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9187392,0.022875756,0.01667968,0.004554308,0.03453283,0.0026182174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5227449,0.17590225,0.1184307,0.015775401,0.14407565,0.02307105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055057336,0.00036219414,0.0011922523,0.020324951,0.0014863188,0.008596243,0.0013563416,0.0014030674,0.009332919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25194046,0.0002656993,0.00088011427,0.024402091,0.001644232,0.00579127,0.0047406596,0.0011833,0.004629248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010834781,0.00040832226,0.4502136,0.009211315,0.0007134511,0.0005400515,0.035585668,0.0006229161,0.0031604331,0.01071529,0.054266542,0.4334789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063483734,0.0015307469,0.7993971,0.0029565874,0.00040918094,0.0010191087,0.016345534,0.0010298273,0.0032638093,0.0027442086,0.17102818,0.00021222966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039021573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00448144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97967505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003460936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068627023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29117447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616004446","doi":"","title":"Supporting Knowledge Mobilization and Research Impact Strategies in Grant Applications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Scholarship; Citation impact; Political science; Social research; Citation; Public relations; Grantsmanship; Sociology; Social science; Public administration; Library science; Higher education","score_opus":0.7008402576772212,"score_gpt":0.7181724566775245,"score_spread":0.01733219900030325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616004446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071105234,0.0041235327,0.16085307,0.17013459,0.0020222238,0.016040774,0.0006919322,0.0019058948,0.57312274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76876235,0.0025433786,0.16805325,0.016230725,0.0013424858,0.022494523,0.0006120929,0.0005103032,0.019450909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6400021,0.2599458,0.018912226,0.01468593,0.044951785,0.021502135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3546723,0.4877801,0.033814024,0.036920413,0.05418892,0.032624204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3550978,0.002229256,0.0017704361,0.015645096,0.013636316,0.051411312,0.008277542,0.014273613,0.03863518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54227036,0.0014878709,0.0021788264,0.012563345,0.016289659,0.03284224,0.044930354,0.010044614,0.011825886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033248676,0.0016429452,0.010356981,0.0028372393,0.0001788694,0.0006717042,0.035896674,0.00464044,0.0011505431,0.46812582,0.038171925,0.4359943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006910486,0.0007190145,0.0077351085,0.006105926,0.00022887648,0.00029614326,0.030815784,0.007391511,0.0023431946,0.6789777,0.2644156,0.0002800891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030588883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035102272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025849696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109788395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79527926},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2618646793","doi":"10.29173/cais967","title":"Research Activities and Networks in CAIS Conferences for the Period of 1993- 2015: Social Network Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Social network analysis; Collaborative network; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2774019072057237,"score_gpt":0.47295419358311347,"score_spread":0.19555228637738975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618646793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408972,0.013805247,0.0019880345,0.0033133903,0.00014171396,0.00031307683,0.012862335,0.00007234273,0.026606644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98026836,0.005092432,0.0028825537,0.0001305195,0.0001362426,0.00032249064,0.00630202,0.000027611524,0.004837824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380046,0.0015757876,0.0007507707,0.0007829845,0.0024303289,0.0006597608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96054757,0.015740212,0.011155033,0.00093273143,0.00835249,0.0032718652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069385036,0.00035003677,0.00040718596,0.020347565,0.0028228385,0.004781733,0.0008025564,0.0007839275,0.0038634443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029735439,0.00022222029,0.00051404495,0.03549898,0.0008546404,0.0029600763,0.0024493868,0.0006633673,0.00058743096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003765733,0.00009923982,0.7168375,0.0026251234,0.00045718258,0.0014031201,0.088305935,0.0020161544,0.0015168046,0.009233696,0.015282075,0.16184652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011518307,0.000066409695,0.8740821,0.00055825885,0.00012373204,0.00040206348,0.053307343,0.0014125883,0.0006150078,0.00108683,0.06827205,0.00006211009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09284211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13433725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008967324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009408335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1846034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621224786","doi":"","title":"Profil de la production scientifique du Gouvernement fédéral canadien","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.26061314343054093,"score_gpt":0.4888830199265101,"score_spread":0.2282698764959692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621224786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75272757,0.0098881,0.0077626617,0.0047055404,0.0005190123,0.000088130575,0.010732106,0.00060311216,0.21297376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93017185,0.0044496213,0.0036479686,0.00008406695,0.00025794524,0.00013848895,0.0030974557,0.00012425534,0.058028277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350464,0.0018052196,0.00017615217,0.000773409,0.0031273635,0.00061314687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926353,0.0042750663,0.00056439213,0.00044555537,0.0015771142,0.0005025252],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032344516,0.0007553405,0.0008514102,0.008218838,0.002340689,0.00764315,0.0005084198,0.0011023853,0.013033267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014503335,0.00034060498,0.0007062329,0.010258072,0.0014109584,0.0016462151,0.0012424096,0.0024377357,0.0036019324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014877195,0.00053074915,0.2559078,0.0009782137,0.00075403595,0.0009839163,0.010698452,0.029419454,0.013297409,0.23000424,0.027926609,0.4280114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013848337,0.00027818338,0.7800366,0.00041098899,0.00019858197,0.00054739276,0.0035280585,0.013847829,0.011226631,0.009938472,0.1796492,0.0001996834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2714507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22874436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016325435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006975442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621257984","doi":"10.1177/0162243916687038","title":"Managing Ambiguities at the Edge of Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Bureaucracy; Legitimacy; Portfolio; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Ethnography; Political science; Public relations; Business; Marketing; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.44149464514655984,"score_gpt":0.5586162204709909,"score_spread":0.11712157532443107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621257984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6348876,0.002994559,0.20842269,0.03452419,0.0002652501,0.00040245848,0.00014142557,0.00028445217,0.11807738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673962,0.00038469365,0.028511798,0.00082302483,0.00009632605,0.00013614824,0.000051338146,0.000053829885,0.0025466958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9459276,0.025591964,0.0031353952,0.005373581,0.015142102,0.0048293485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8336138,0.11260269,0.021087721,0.018721629,0.008279207,0.0056949197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05561418,0.00059022644,0.0017486464,0.006283399,0.0103936875,0.029084789,0.0052408124,0.0056646955,0.004238654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14457242,0.0013120895,0.00094358466,0.005757044,0.030912664,0.033408035,0.023976976,0.006741793,0.00069408945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023872951,0.00015905255,0.009774887,0.00033050374,0.000095175186,0.001424692,0.07590072,0.006997358,0.0019928468,0.82407343,0.0019782078,0.077034324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051182717,0.00009186349,0.0019713736,0.00038044,0.00006390339,0.0003265991,0.05568398,0.008608972,0.0018438488,0.89928424,0.031618558,0.000074880256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021597873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007224178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29411948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621368193","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Research Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada – Phase II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phase (matter); Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6370560247470263,"score_gpt":0.6432071427948152,"score_spread":0.006151118047788895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621368193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46830505,0.0395924,0.003890951,0.008547856,0.0011576083,0.0028552692,0.30826908,0.0008717839,0.16651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7589318,0.017946951,0.007610931,0.0008853998,0.0007327088,0.0018521621,0.18285485,0.00022039638,0.02896474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97268844,0.0027456768,0.0021227652,0.0012294424,0.018852165,0.0023615463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.901855,0.009739842,0.008304078,0.002817712,0.07243317,0.0048503336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01404545,0.00069214485,0.0019006224,0.10092251,0.0028474592,0.0056767943,0.0018957703,0.0007481866,0.0051598363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04830528,0.00026533956,0.0013641014,0.16018444,0.0009025227,0.0011528454,0.00223319,0.0006871579,0.0015674162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021014411,0.00066223706,0.45036978,0.009955448,0.0027268776,0.00055768935,0.003346195,0.0034306296,0.007621099,0.0120463995,0.17278762,0.33439463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120594195,0.00022222927,0.84110326,0.0008214219,0.0011168025,0.00021821755,0.0023472314,0.0013373636,0.0044585485,0.00062482734,0.14755997,0.00006942772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6021196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62652963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028902723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12824993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8004471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621569939","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.003","title":"The Top 100 Most-Cited Articles in Stroke Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Medicine; Web of science; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Neuroimaging; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Library science; Meta-analysis; Pathology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.6362674060047658,"score_gpt":0.6025859043510968,"score_spread":0.03368150165366901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621569939","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01792104,0.9694253,0.0008713576,0.0015316154,0.00048153504,0.00014324905,0.0064775296,0.00008229915,0.003066108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1212707,0.86377823,0.0052618617,0.00051256944,0.0014665019,0.00025908608,0.006266561,0.000044560737,0.0011399761],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717505,0.0017558915,0.004639897,0.0010510297,0.0050111483,0.00036696537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584851,0.025446959,0.0060971337,0.0007962994,0.008356125,0.0008183679],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007961551,0.0014745895,0.005644044,0.14497152,0.0014815687,0.0059602265,0.0018732919,0.0017572724,0.0043839575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042674776,0.00063651265,0.005137698,0.14868352,0.0010802555,0.0048913625,0.0018674105,0.0010828262,0.00140272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006069618,0.00022765984,0.07728981,0.18452297,0.015384116,0.0010786686,0.0012055213,0.00075492426,0.0013900008,0.002887957,0.030335821,0.68431556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044939766,0.00055538316,0.45529327,0.11631029,0.10918704,0.01045319,0.0057075173,0.0032300306,0.0033555164,0.014959822,0.28001094,0.00048771698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004604816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009840267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021738478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007839865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042105258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622802656","doi":"","title":"Cloaked journal referees: Esteemed goalkeepers of the scholarly world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soundings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.5860515591738229,"score_gpt":0.5498680750643498,"score_spread":0.03618348410947314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622802656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5184803,0.015846282,0.11228583,0.11765359,0.012243587,0.00075893465,0.0006780969,0.0046474095,0.21740595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91284287,0.001985493,0.036199905,0.005126205,0.0023278943,0.0001911171,0.00029407517,0.0006740486,0.040358406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96907413,0.012803647,0.0015172042,0.0019503717,0.013360867,0.0012938008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84149116,0.057582263,0.027811883,0.016594255,0.039141033,0.017379507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029171403,0.00087565376,0.0009893572,0.011983321,0.0068415576,0.023080382,0.0026719284,0.0036312013,0.008614343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1907935,0.0006044924,0.00050181674,0.0087580215,0.0060944306,0.010678236,0.009075508,0.0034658867,0.0028114524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008517081,0.00032023215,0.037015077,0.0010924286,0.00030915014,0.00335511,0.05615775,0.00094188267,0.01121374,0.18073112,0.10768373,0.6003281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032691605,0.00066703995,0.043346334,0.001375755,0.0006227261,0.0037417356,0.06814357,0.0072218413,0.012552222,0.3163351,0.54504204,0.00062462996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015806893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004485098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024716917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054950956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.154275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624878181","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.002","title":"Predicting the age of researchers using bibliometric data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Proxy (statistics); Linear regression; Statistics; Regression analysis; Linear model; Predictive modelling; Regression; Computer science; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9265886468305123,"score_gpt":0.6788366096396239,"score_spread":0.24775203719088845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624878181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722318,0.0064640227,0.028910678,0.0031967526,0.0002879656,0.00030149386,0.069983564,0.0009625484,0.017661309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543205,0.002066406,0.0117628155,0.00014968902,0.00020958668,0.00013456661,0.028022392,0.0000630083,0.0032711683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952643,0.0012447655,0.00055770803,0.00068818044,0.0017439099,0.00050111074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92795855,0.03520949,0.01480837,0.0047357166,0.015101518,0.0021864623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011428539,0.0006362158,0.0010591787,0.018484926,0.00077398506,0.0032890115,0.00090774207,0.0011467077,0.002606581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08159205,0.00028468916,0.00094572856,0.019701801,0.00040877933,0.0031806948,0.0013800485,0.0011124203,0.0036624367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014159424,0.00009686103,0.9247236,0.00032915652,0.00021747225,0.00015792756,0.00056774705,0.011514654,0.00032232772,0.0016685072,0.0075328657,0.052727345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003470672,0.00014399302,0.87249875,0.00039587377,0.00019782603,0.00022199137,0.0013843516,0.07987332,0.00205085,0.0057829507,0.037302945,0.00011235502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088954814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08573564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98857147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035325629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004034497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17687404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625074894","doi":"10.29173/cais942","title":"Citation Distance: Measuring Knowledge Translation, Integration, Diffusion &amp; Scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scope (computer science); Similarity (geometry); Humanities; Computer science; Library science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4114400887591147,"score_gpt":0.4456787272752897,"score_spread":0.03423863851617498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625074894","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37875196,0.022600455,0.5557907,0.0038438877,0.0005894731,0.0004709973,0.004373577,0.00205151,0.03152737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83862865,0.004008775,0.1495789,0.00018470151,0.0005355674,0.00041313437,0.0023949281,0.00018421354,0.0040710475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898184,0.0020172072,0.0013812592,0.001398713,0.0050244136,0.00036004907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95792294,0.021824026,0.00806478,0.0028922777,0.008537803,0.0007581588],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429832,0.0011834607,0.001415866,0.029063752,0.0013555611,0.005622187,0.001647769,0.0023864247,0.0021636188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057325516,0.00044185526,0.0011834939,0.030269781,0.0017614823,0.010305786,0.002518793,0.0011930936,0.0010743646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003133028,0.00032559762,0.14778674,0.00230977,0.0010260838,0.00046832298,0.0039293887,0.048036687,0.011923283,0.10613576,0.008044616,0.6697005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021103946,0.0010782182,0.22768357,0.0010756373,0.001102392,0.0030243576,0.0038478218,0.33173954,0.034758367,0.31156808,0.083132625,0.0007783376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033974277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028839125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97093624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018206803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017087522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03400463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625269005","doi":"10.11613/bm.2017.030","title":"Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biochemia Medica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misrepresentation; Publication; Deception; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8941266353903872,"score_gpt":0.7234011886426125,"score_spread":0.17072544674777468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625269005","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070596347,0.7010609,0.012847223,0.23238283,0.009068789,0.00032593383,0.000060625767,0.000054975015,0.037139036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20258662,0.6389903,0.029967366,0.09949081,0.018160282,0.0010264798,0.000100137346,0.00010557264,0.009572489],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7841602,0.1362345,0.01689058,0.0041586794,0.05657978,0.001976247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60556436,0.2949545,0.046640757,0.013126962,0.03525985,0.004453545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09148185,0.0003660931,0.0009741854,0.004017461,0.0034025544,0.009813797,0.0018520225,0.00564304,0.0018126597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24721703,0.00047361723,0.00059111987,0.0061720596,0.013808144,0.007818175,0.004153616,0.0056259823,0.000769415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011742557,0.000103196726,0.0057225437,0.0148518225,0.00027510073,0.0016505447,0.014655724,0.0003474834,0.0010261491,0.2171296,0.070398495,0.67372197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005045078,0.00013439513,0.004789902,0.026241854,0.00017646255,0.0047119753,0.008197789,0.0002481338,0.001274647,0.14614052,0.8079493,0.000084525826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001093345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026432136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030444593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014802351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48380804},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2625746381","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Finding Theses and Dissertations: Borrowing & Purchasing Copies of Theses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Purchasing; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.7845677185182496,"score_gpt":0.6516716903515569,"score_spread":0.13289602816669266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625746381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003708685,0.0021746105,0.038341124,0.009607943,0.002806364,0.006953128,0.115197666,0.045115657,0.7760949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043061343,0.0037674694,0.1198083,0.0016447308,0.00048165146,0.0042811874,0.04602737,0.015069583,0.80461353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944056,0.0009948238,0.0009024411,0.00041821436,0.0030841285,0.0001948075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626991,0.012907526,0.001608138,0.004975529,0.014663532,0.00314603],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008242936,0.00091915776,0.0011839868,0.006836389,0.0025965343,0.0062341946,0.001986162,0.0013596346,0.54986644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046052247,0.001895165,0.00088066165,0.010548603,0.000828175,0.0048595755,0.0027609067,0.0020631873,0.6014575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016657825,0.000036874375,0.00015426369,0.00018993898,0.0000021138299,0.000025731835,0.00025982756,0.000035753437,0.0002168261,0.0014005529,0.88091433,0.11674713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012360648,0.00001360582,0.00047487798,0.00012043775,0.0000020086966,0.0000371585,0.0002880414,0.00004532225,0.00021302517,0.00093491597,0.99784553,0.000012763214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009192773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024943441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99376583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015031677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012358529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6420609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625867801","doi":"10.22054/jks.2017.15975.1109","title":"تحلیل سطوح همکاری علمی پژوهشگران ایرانی در پایگاه وبآوساینس : مطالعه موردی حوزه علوم اجتماعی","year":2017,"lang":"fa","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9040632922854434,"score_gpt":0.7788238502099075,"score_spread":0.12523944207553583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625867801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57516056,0.010886316,0.10017572,0.020814827,0.002444228,0.0007828536,0.0037688734,0.0007289229,0.2852377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8096487,0.014639193,0.07032473,0.0021920374,0.0012657077,0.001651756,0.003434171,0.0006663707,0.09617736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967193,0.00063507183,0.00036095866,0.00032917227,0.0017062249,0.00024924072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928427,0.0025310614,0.0014589212,0.00033348144,0.0025531435,0.00028060804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043369485,0.00036280288,0.00025492327,0.002560374,0.0013875782,0.003895019,0.00035506894,0.00064735016,0.021954518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010692336,0.00038215998,0.00034131896,0.004015153,0.0015264046,0.0023927244,0.0010262809,0.0014971293,0.010656335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005178506,0.00023210148,0.053187743,0.0018992004,0.0001278808,0.004275174,0.034476295,0.0013387526,0.030485336,0.074405506,0.041970294,0.75708383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056172237,0.00018856092,0.23458003,0.0012319239,0.00010751616,0.0040263007,0.03525392,0.0022449086,0.020897133,0.03723281,0.6640072,0.00017353529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049644257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055938493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022320864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039372696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07344514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2637192718","doi":"10.29173/cais796","title":"Field Delineation or Field Delimitation for Mapping Sciences?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Humanities; Field (mathematics); Cartography; Mathematics; Geography; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.3781392262104905,"score_gpt":0.4635077816635726,"score_spread":0.08536855545308208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2637192718","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013760544,0.010801979,0.8479235,0.053872585,0.0023187026,0.0002607343,0.00094666774,0.0013031979,0.06881222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31670135,0.0058885966,0.65133977,0.0072249803,0.0017749397,0.0014862791,0.0011902343,0.0009608529,0.0134330485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116766,0.005378946,0.0007472594,0.0014342351,0.0008753744,0.00039651804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97367,0.014453194,0.0027259085,0.005891476,0.0025263904,0.000732999],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016322626,0.00089743047,0.0013509478,0.004457118,0.0022127011,0.007534686,0.0023071603,0.0034125065,0.013365433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059468906,0.00064641546,0.001317671,0.006461096,0.013366494,0.023969434,0.004385419,0.0036932388,0.003385271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057257104,0.000013753557,0.0015290193,0.00039563357,0.000020332178,0.00003784298,0.0015256242,0.0017803758,0.00043153972,0.921237,0.008680728,0.06429085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615982,0.000049998584,0.0017614608,0.0006629399,0.000028303057,0.00020333957,0.0023974902,0.0039031892,0.00071533426,0.7986074,0.19157735,0.000057055433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004498809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030590773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034879774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00329928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08632332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2639113251","doi":"10.1057/s41292-017-0053-4","title":"Mapping Global Health: A network analysis of a heterogeneous publication domain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioSocieties","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; National Institutes of Health; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; UNICEF; Eli Lilly and Company; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Scientometrics; Citation; Bibliometrics; Metadata; Data science; Publishing; Citation analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Field (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.48707373986587904,"score_gpt":0.5695464090099026,"score_spread":0.08247266914402357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2639113251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79113495,0.005026148,0.15013543,0.004058775,0.00009727487,0.0003414373,0.014047889,0.0005134434,0.034644775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94494945,0.0020929307,0.04590653,0.00012527645,0.00009460105,0.00019373758,0.004489005,0.000069679845,0.0020787418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735665,0.0013032473,0.00020188488,0.00042221928,0.0005605929,0.00015541988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98223823,0.0132968435,0.001804633,0.0008817014,0.0013476561,0.00043102444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028465835,0.00040603956,0.00046372143,0.022549508,0.0011979692,0.004616892,0.00058652635,0.0007807029,0.0041703237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987481,0.00019659537,0.0009010097,0.030154845,0.00070736994,0.0039208154,0.0018895989,0.00049718766,0.0005287013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053717353,0.0003235346,0.4451044,0.0021317573,0.0018603078,0.00090877555,0.008119612,0.046184253,0.009355831,0.0938883,0.010547231,0.38103887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098068514,0.00019413623,0.38396206,0.00083511876,0.002029003,0.0012766466,0.018619971,0.2711016,0.005299896,0.24730894,0.069131985,0.00014255235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008935911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00920272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012165642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015542546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017767787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660520211","doi":"","title":"Impact Beyond Citation: An Introduction to Altmetrics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2453686155132267,"score_gpt":0.4464203354055481,"score_spread":0.2010517198923214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660520211","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025928523,0.29696512,0.37526777,0.053002503,0.022239698,0.0009594346,0.02116924,0.013154425,0.21464907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06578167,0.30289462,0.48638144,0.009353754,0.057429932,0.004204303,0.01750477,0.010739807,0.045709804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9492105,0.020669123,0.006750336,0.0037478714,0.018824233,0.00079791044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8316806,0.1121099,0.015281386,0.012936416,0.025355397,0.0026363572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035765663,0.0029444543,0.0032715236,0.050703987,0.0031778929,0.02404602,0.004583551,0.0044781608,0.023941796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16686384,0.0014955684,0.0029758685,0.11787506,0.009227915,0.02429682,0.008239986,0.008371788,0.01749475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006231595,0.000053351698,0.0031443634,0.0037177214,0.00019510095,0.000117777236,0.0012031164,0.0029387532,0.000255776,0.37785444,0.28532183,0.32513544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008878593,0.000027320564,0.0020341966,0.0011500086,0.00003414029,0.00017637189,0.00034406778,0.0018231412,0.00019000856,0.19763024,0.7964822,0.00009943851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045753927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028262376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96423435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067339903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006169486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18914914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660852010","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004","title":"Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Open research; Gold standard (test); Citation impact; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.8704276285011111,"score_gpt":0.6422364638488748,"score_spread":0.22819116465223632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660852010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145892,0.0022173715,0.0035754498,0.0034225697,0.00036787425,0.00009129716,0.0011900498,0.00019651717,0.07434965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948427,0.0003047157,0.0016811473,0.00018877623,0.00009339551,0.000018449653,0.00054205477,0.00004325532,0.0022855806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478626,0.011162342,0.0017733778,0.0026785762,0.033173095,0.0033500472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7789862,0.14787655,0.019973125,0.014383994,0.029257229,0.009522866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022658248,0.00060859194,0.0009814542,0.010820715,0.0016337072,0.010934708,0.0013542656,0.0020546322,0.007520323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15937038,0.00026732168,0.0010844924,0.013005677,0.005611332,0.009998578,0.0060246354,0.0020981012,0.0013481067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003968823,0.0017126088,0.5226332,0.0016150585,0.0010458196,0.000581334,0.005704152,0.011550272,0.0081962515,0.113190584,0.011405944,0.3183959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003261739,0.003354085,0.7126459,0.00084686064,0.0012454612,0.0008956128,0.020811114,0.023980351,0.033676498,0.14269368,0.059177153,0.00034720238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069258227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008431053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059414976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004812017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119829655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2700484896","doi":"10.29173/cais188","title":"Science in the European Union – “Before and After” A Scientometric Approach to Measure the Structural Transformation of Science in Central and Eastern Europe after the Political-Economical Changes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; European union; Scientometrics; Political science; Politics; Geography; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.12207664046591275,"score_gpt":0.3635625514400739,"score_spread":0.2414859109741611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2700484896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552849,0.004157583,0.002738122,0.00066699256,0.00006876583,0.00005054181,0.0016614582,0.0000423652,0.035329234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939614,0.0012779663,0.0016626021,0.00006896685,0.000050649636,0.000044909568,0.0011169731,0.000011830915,0.001804857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710494,0.00097197935,0.00044337937,0.0004163337,0.0007777277,0.00028559507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941468,0.0023021377,0.0016178575,0.00058383116,0.0011235957,0.00022583717],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004567752,0.00021179931,0.0004691095,0.017101252,0.0011207376,0.00479463,0.0004032011,0.00076886197,0.0024691818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012645055,0.00017002036,0.000659247,0.04369927,0.0012351766,0.0042832266,0.0016851231,0.0004149796,0.0002917175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007014934,0.000151986,0.6482053,0.00091552,0.0008437021,0.00080177456,0.029662143,0.011244637,0.0023022974,0.08203327,0.004378382,0.21875955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012918464,0.0001113355,0.94510144,0.00019614914,0.000107939304,0.00015868683,0.00933383,0.001827287,0.0011312292,0.007255824,0.034732897,0.000030520216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011319286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027985973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017236975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026658714},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2705668613","doi":"10.29173/cais133","title":"Interdisciplinary Outreach of Library and Information Science Research as Reflected in “Essential Science Indicators”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.15518211831636614,"score_gpt":0.46798115390538914,"score_spread":0.312799035589023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705668613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932297,0.003848447,0.0054974835,0.0025213424,0.00010397011,0.00006573661,0.00031144472,0.00011766671,0.05523692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943123,0.0010792436,0.0020633368,0.00009079894,0.000091984795,0.000037402096,0.0001455474,0.000020886366,0.0021586176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397636,0.005140626,0.001367344,0.0008072903,0.007913026,0.00079533015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82192874,0.11798218,0.02284893,0.007772385,0.019764977,0.00970287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019625857,0.0003132525,0.0006804019,0.021500893,0.0016397889,0.005700567,0.00071699213,0.0008122195,0.0049519623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0821239,0.00023133103,0.00044855583,0.016689695,0.0018080736,0.005493902,0.0071192137,0.0008877728,0.0007422758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059303583,0.00056074775,0.5776716,0.0016258807,0.00030434487,0.0005563784,0.033577625,0.001292221,0.010570262,0.025002474,0.0019560282,0.34628946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002547784,0.00037693963,0.9352378,0.00031954635,0.00010682002,0.0007145693,0.015994027,0.0014323021,0.004006742,0.015605248,0.026122564,0.000058020734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011714816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017752396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98037416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042844308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10379267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731216545","doi":"10.21810/strm.v4i1.56","title":"Enclosure and emancipation in scholarly journals publishing: Overview, critical, global and communication perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Publishing; Enclosure; Sociology; Media studies; Scholarly communication; Social science; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.5381497618845964,"score_gpt":0.5839818271858536,"score_spread":0.04583206530125716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731216545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06421223,0.5705508,0.012287028,0.15589131,0.00338525,0.00011248055,0.00010323272,0.000072376075,0.19338517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6569239,0.31627265,0.00421009,0.005071308,0.00907937,0.00020449661,0.0000730548,0.00004226019,0.008122918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890246,0.0076539414,0.0005588977,0.00044539003,0.0013748547,0.0009423482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95116204,0.042518616,0.0028478487,0.0006878884,0.0020272352,0.00075643277],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013081178,0.0006997569,0.0007984073,0.014301522,0.006344426,0.026834592,0.001310697,0.0050006732,0.0027375096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012666673,0.00037643957,0.00053979596,0.020179681,0.029387569,0.017493447,0.006326904,0.004059515,0.0003611391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004471584,0.000061259474,0.0021610563,0.0020044856,0.000031258245,0.00037975708,0.035894774,0.00032191782,0.00016349264,0.8970765,0.006466524,0.0553943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018411072,0.0001799962,0.0096955,0.004230775,0.00010220227,0.002071629,0.13011633,0.0008636835,0.0010262283,0.43832833,0.41330785,0.000059178237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018342338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023590534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98569846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075160065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005310286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735828996","doi":"10.21037/arh.2017.07.01","title":"Scientific publishing in different countries: what simple numbers do not tell","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Research Hospitals","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Gross domestic product; Productivity; Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Regional science; Scientific publishing; Bibliometrics; Product (mathematics); Position (finance); Library science; Scientific literature; Geography; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Law; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.75696935636546,"score_gpt":0.6483349814115639,"score_spread":0.10863437495389616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735828996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07218662,0.3681077,0.0136125395,0.4463422,0.039010838,0.00010942847,0.0075767413,0.00047058766,0.05258333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65011054,0.21148923,0.024975931,0.071050934,0.02910234,0.000245409,0.0062455796,0.0007096264,0.006070472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97248554,0.009147647,0.005720028,0.002731371,0.009101166,0.0008142023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8526281,0.084968306,0.024258126,0.0089689875,0.024598688,0.00457782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026077937,0.0009537339,0.0024478922,0.019400448,0.0018362069,0.014746137,0.0019418871,0.002677748,0.0055113984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15924783,0.0006486879,0.001224199,0.039456893,0.007934195,0.035165936,0.0042801383,0.0052818274,0.0032485393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048230236,0.000102945494,0.09923924,0.007283792,0.001622895,0.00039710777,0.0079509085,0.0009816895,0.00054698373,0.08246172,0.19506755,0.60386294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011939877,0.0003450443,0.12560116,0.016480774,0.00091635005,0.0026150083,0.026853185,0.0013898319,0.0008901262,0.25812048,0.5662452,0.00042345436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049029114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005441517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029314237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027694427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13791496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737578613","doi":"10.1126/science.aan4141","title":"Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Peer review; Scientific integrity; Computer science; Data science; Biology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8970602255231176,"score_gpt":0.6988842992273749,"score_spread":0.19817592629574265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737578613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03468385,0.010454582,0.14257821,0.4078065,0.018926362,0.0025285478,0.0034051447,0.0053997734,0.37421703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5788722,0.010743736,0.17178889,0.054459997,0.04469719,0.0030921781,0.0045121918,0.003861187,0.12797242],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.67062855,0.13004188,0.042116147,0.0121765975,0.13983525,0.0052016093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13166174,0.35181648,0.09439262,0.20526627,0.20253277,0.01433013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2550476,0.0013627147,0.002886154,0.015825862,0.005516256,0.052856356,0.0055561205,0.0105232205,0.026100341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69736505,0.002089335,0.0017042713,0.015375068,0.009376613,0.04439288,0.013190167,0.01122773,0.02719869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063057453,0.0006035121,0.02383377,0.0017750714,0.00076322374,0.0003625646,0.0046042306,0.0013700281,0.0031254145,0.22865264,0.28247538,0.45180357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003617762,0.0002688186,0.012436342,0.0012851688,0.0005084633,0.0007299077,0.0019508416,0.005886429,0.00812031,0.3623183,0.6057867,0.000347006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012397256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018671446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004932305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037639756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.918659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739655593","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.1887","title":"Open access increases citations of papers in ecology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Confounding; Latin Americans; Citation impact; Library science; Ecology; Geography; Political science; Medicine; Biology; Computer science; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.7533937263709878,"score_gpt":0.6796219715834086,"score_spread":0.07377175478757914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739655593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82955617,0.017604025,0.0036395164,0.009734437,0.0025815887,0.0003090404,0.0026273993,0.00035244395,0.1335954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804621,0.0043990375,0.002178527,0.0009996553,0.0015728128,0.00007977273,0.00078807387,0.000099166355,0.009420786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810229,0.005727081,0.0019641423,0.0014372397,0.008440491,0.0014081727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7493111,0.14974748,0.0450787,0.011104238,0.028904935,0.015853686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013929664,0.00042450466,0.0009285631,0.01337858,0.0024508154,0.011252394,0.0008830299,0.0020228464,0.028415384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13697967,0.000255781,0.0016041268,0.022295674,0.0013648584,0.007037659,0.0063421153,0.0014899927,0.0036939266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001693231,0.0015809624,0.6258651,0.0037887031,0.0013980654,0.0019825986,0.0043447185,0.001660691,0.006240776,0.03161398,0.024871573,0.29495963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003135403,0.0009092095,0.85230696,0.0011152806,0.0006722049,0.0009587816,0.003746604,0.0019673447,0.0037426918,0.056574106,0.077572845,0.00012055314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002208246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028750505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98662144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020811826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024388407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09505892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741809807","doi":"10.7717/peerj.4375","title":"The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Citation analysis; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5282231477637149,"score_gpt":0.6017320210786108,"score_spread":0.07350887331489586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741809807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96472657,0.0052700257,0.0014501227,0.0010207794,0.00006035077,0.00024114951,0.02100134,0.00011256636,0.006117029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116916,0.0027675328,0.0019301985,0.00034951326,0.00024364381,0.00033699346,0.012015316,0.000120453566,0.0010670979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830496,0.0033689453,0.003935193,0.0024513525,0.006347062,0.0008478073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79993874,0.0753607,0.08328031,0.011759895,0.023919279,0.005741088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013144218,0.00039248247,0.00080525375,0.024831494,0.0013601779,0.0047156,0.0014910316,0.0010084651,0.003874563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08927786,0.00056306267,0.0013993364,0.02907943,0.0017686295,0.005352458,0.0039307894,0.0011689946,0.002116394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089451074,0.0000645477,0.98281693,0.0004633472,0.00026592572,0.0001333884,0.0019966047,0.000064904794,0.00027110986,0.0003873372,0.0026310144,0.010815435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008642036,0.000048469872,0.991176,0.0002082103,0.00014236676,0.00040780182,0.0025660119,0.0003350266,0.0002348348,0.00024658098,0.004595863,0.000030091493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008248107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010605531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010691233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017445151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069514155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742734818","doi":"","title":"Open Access among Canadian Library and Information Science Faculty / L'accès libre dans la communauté de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Access to information; Sociology; Information access; Art","score_opus":0.27498958596042294,"score_gpt":0.45043017610888453,"score_spread":0.17544059014846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742734818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41664088,0.01431225,0.0019160226,0.09932067,0.0011024793,0.0003323519,0.0053617554,0.0002778915,0.46073574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9170889,0.0032608376,0.00096109015,0.004182656,0.00017576972,0.000071430506,0.000803863,0.00009374761,0.07336168],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97529536,0.0024646746,0.00083808205,0.0015885296,0.013543494,0.0062698456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213501,0.013108399,0.0048151095,0.0019881667,0.0337988,0.024939375],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011654275,0.00036562348,0.0007955548,0.013030139,0.021093318,0.02151157,0.0024958812,0.002748384,0.03774672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06001048,0.0005268111,0.00065090053,0.02240878,0.0069320668,0.0057807947,0.009852107,0.0029064447,0.0016885326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005613135,0.00041118858,0.22055286,0.0007628457,0.00017716736,0.00096581737,0.08791236,0.00067700114,0.0016585737,0.24197061,0.143333,0.30101728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007944646,0.00006483557,0.31787723,0.00096657744,0.00014359372,0.00028767096,0.08836311,0.00085140014,0.0010361939,0.011302384,0.5787405,0.0002870563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15960133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33374673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9747433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743500302","doi":"10.1186/s12992-017-0284-y","title":"Global research trends in West Nile virus from 1943 to 2016: a bibliometric analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Globalization and Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Public health; Bibliometrics; Library science; West Nile virus; Medicine; Geography; Socioeconomics; Political science; MEDLINE; Virology; Virus; Pathology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.7076635970603089,"score_gpt":0.6744412597005542,"score_spread":0.03322233735975466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743500302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79327893,0.08700322,0.0027297635,0.0031131532,0.00023317916,0.00059898786,0.091576256,0.00038655792,0.021079967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90784943,0.051342674,0.005088747,0.00019332148,0.0003400906,0.00056363596,0.032727007,0.00007966902,0.0018154787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927087,0.0008825598,0.0020195888,0.0007773162,0.0032003885,0.00041140502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96656656,0.01530736,0.009057375,0.0008114929,0.007365679,0.00089152437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005867332,0.00059072446,0.0012547218,0.12127156,0.0010020311,0.0047726417,0.00065125735,0.0005053621,0.002518574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03159908,0.00022955071,0.0018918647,0.19312777,0.0006886766,0.003036787,0.002120758,0.00043755939,0.00066246884],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002662222,0.00009280095,0.7662994,0.015927691,0.002128589,0.00081681396,0.003656247,0.0016810662,0.0012908063,0.0025066417,0.0111054955,0.19422819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024168923,0.0001367231,0.9415295,0.0035205104,0.0015836746,0.001222153,0.006062106,0.0024952698,0.00096977135,0.0016059459,0.040768437,0.00008163579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063213278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074906563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99413264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020956926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038110365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03102976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747001800","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.12404.1","title":"Exploring Vietnamese co-authorship patterns in social sciences with basic network measures of 2008-2017 Scopus data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Clustering coefficient; Scopus; Cluster analysis; Biology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.9720149141063179,"score_gpt":0.6744967559506466,"score_spread":0.2975181581556713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747001800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978909,0.0003243867,0.0007047538,0.00017257319,0.000011072804,0.000034305922,0.016092878,0.000023986744,0.003726971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989641,0.0001302282,0.00089135737,0.00000859584,0.000008681711,0.000047137608,0.008710489,0.000007493343,0.00055495166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927324,0.00017419156,0.00011678507,0.00012678122,0.00019816218,0.00011082558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059606,0.004885225,0.0021758534,0.0003889396,0.0013990666,0.0005547579],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010993691,0.00020998156,0.0002581713,0.012238802,0.00051223155,0.0010663342,0.00028617363,0.0002271406,0.0029758615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009927509,0.00008090134,0.0003724844,0.015753677,0.00032202885,0.0010402065,0.0009352231,0.00027335342,0.00037697985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113505565,0.000058855658,0.9575126,0.00051363633,0.0002604601,0.00049215637,0.0020641885,0.004360129,0.0007337271,0.0023418486,0.005266477,0.026282372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008228216,0.00005182609,0.96751904,0.00016055808,0.00009241608,0.00026693143,0.0056230812,0.015065211,0.0005241423,0.0015459735,0.009116074,0.000026533462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028906133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038735475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010594175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010860862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057475746},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2748401780","doi":"10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0","title":"Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Medical Association; Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Core competency; Medicine; Documentation; Publication; Medical education; Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Statement (logic); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.8874701275799235,"score_gpt":0.66066345119232,"score_spread":0.22680667638760355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748401780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09177786,0.066214286,0.12641509,0.6239078,0.016118513,0.0155403735,0.005685625,0.0011865703,0.053153887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3835097,0.031217476,0.5077633,0.045974117,0.00342895,0.012399102,0.0092296945,0.00032582897,0.006151789],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91691583,0.03437769,0.023515377,0.0031277186,0.018489812,0.0035735238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5953068,0.18244745,0.037829913,0.011653564,0.1423198,0.030442396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16751373,0.0013447918,0.002496969,0.007983401,0.0041411514,0.0058003785,0.0067476677,0.009248038,0.0035789097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2843185,0.0012419695,0.0037490593,0.004287799,0.0035491874,0.007257176,0.01170467,0.009787064,0.0020984376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006079878,0.001205595,0.044821385,0.032171417,0.0009800867,0.00076082273,0.010484046,0.0035384193,0.003923238,0.031500153,0.1924216,0.67758524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012305214,0.0016055751,0.114158705,0.11417832,0.0020223223,0.0046871533,0.025920672,0.011314277,0.009842622,0.10461873,0.60959166,0.00082949124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052586216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007912234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010679481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07981435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8859079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749291387","doi":"10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-16-0458","title":"Author Impact Metrics in Communication Sciences and Disorder Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Promotion (chess); Accreditation; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Psychology; Impact factor; Medical education; MEDLINE; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.8407099573396452,"score_gpt":0.7295781448308641,"score_spread":0.11113181250878101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749291387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6269371,0.09988303,0.037975397,0.012924961,0.0026046364,0.0020610983,0.13657951,0.0017471351,0.07928705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206911,0.013290552,0.03188678,0.0005972427,0.00079689606,0.0011572924,0.02956817,0.00022112022,0.0017907246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91429895,0.020514017,0.020416295,0.0040645883,0.039027907,0.0016782724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52980477,0.22772673,0.11348711,0.020747049,0.097292826,0.010941542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06425832,0.0010138863,0.0019606329,0.07923439,0.0021935105,0.011312575,0.0018252514,0.0010128673,0.0037036827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28639013,0.00034590438,0.0018167807,0.14683089,0.0018098302,0.0071382723,0.0060223853,0.0009752793,0.0010278701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003295934,0.0001269079,0.7729073,0.006039717,0.0012162662,0.0001709828,0.002419374,0.002417771,0.00062545954,0.006279219,0.02092387,0.18654361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060252903,0.00045848265,0.8823818,0.0032645788,0.00064512814,0.0009476134,0.006280356,0.0042940984,0.0022440501,0.012303103,0.086935654,0.00018481733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051838495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010544911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93574166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059970943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007768295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33983457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750019786","doi":"10.1002/1873-3468.12792","title":"Peer Review – the future is here","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FEBS Letters","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Promotion (chess); Citation; Peer review; Impact factor; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5201533861824702,"score_gpt":0.5697646892874678,"score_spread":0.04961130310499762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750019786","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038359757,0.040446553,0.013543536,0.19843225,0.44201636,0.0011480227,0.0015248834,0.012403028,0.2901018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004869131,0.027308024,0.013704428,0.0654354,0.13306783,0.0012801162,0.0018923375,0.0067721563,0.7456705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662437,0.009902419,0.0024754182,0.0039141374,0.015745755,0.0017185501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88643414,0.01717771,0.0066479193,0.01913649,0.047123075,0.023480693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02298887,0.0023249658,0.0028907438,0.0038646813,0.0053495974,0.021594508,0.004148036,0.009680373,0.47264066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09565452,0.00150999,0.0017291593,0.002860621,0.0051238625,0.018867074,0.0119876405,0.015598967,0.61573964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695687,0.000016331705,0.000018411749,0.00023632507,0.000005843053,0.000029210694,0.000060534912,0.000013538192,0.0001397481,0.002033448,0.95365316,0.04377975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061187407,0.000008233132,0.00004097105,0.00016362744,0.0000014328613,0.000051089464,0.00004063271,0.000013180633,0.000033478107,0.0015727188,0.99805933,0.000009086196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011151455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016908828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97701114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028265077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012685429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7522141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751036922","doi":"10.1038/549007a","title":"Illegitimate journals scam even senior scientists","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Litany; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.5142632163913022,"score_gpt":0.6416546012437285,"score_spread":0.1273913848524263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751036922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021071905,0.014337078,0.0033409537,0.81974554,0.0397098,0.000073598414,0.0008041343,0.001757335,0.099159695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19190913,0.015926683,0.006352279,0.44315198,0.04128852,0.000112337315,0.0010739742,0.0015260167,0.29865918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852445,0.0023299234,0.00088260527,0.0014592371,0.008806593,0.0012771727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84701675,0.029521693,0.025121266,0.013348846,0.04615383,0.038837615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01582826,0.0008103198,0.00091171724,0.0060506784,0.00655209,0.01756996,0.0016144394,0.008148776,0.038189445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12718068,0.00069627975,0.0008145832,0.0062009688,0.0065844893,0.011819084,0.0056138122,0.0067600436,0.038296692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013205729,0.00006590858,0.0145194195,0.00024859907,0.00010784659,0.0004209013,0.002688721,0.000059466656,0.0013037764,0.015449285,0.87394005,0.09106398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046151512,0.000088034045,0.009640153,0.0002739167,0.000045210545,0.00055993634,0.002820123,0.0001246464,0.0006768488,0.017057003,0.96860933,0.000058606416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044437195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010358274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037938391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005795629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12775642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751704775","doi":"10.5465/amp.2016.0138","title":"Serendipity Arrangements for Exapting Science-Based Innovations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Exaptation; Serendipity; Performativity; Temporality; Extant taxon; Epistemology; Orchestration; Narrative; Sociology; Cognitive science; Biology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.704219218842055,"score_gpt":0.6320928089577392,"score_spread":0.07212640988431573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751704775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46021912,0.0017190505,0.3045233,0.009773792,0.00017065032,0.0005013112,0.0003615435,0.00057997927,0.22215122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798549,0.00017830693,0.017243693,0.00010447791,0.0000357294,0.00019205162,0.00005173823,0.00003150965,0.0023076998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900664,0.00579275,0.00082394143,0.0021257966,0.0012818795,0.0009689441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645982,0.017463792,0.006933078,0.007532175,0.0014162273,0.0020565426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014701437,0.0004801201,0.0005498297,0.003079208,0.0046013375,0.011418801,0.0014818868,0.0025944717,0.0129104545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03580562,0.0006115364,0.0007041613,0.0022340713,0.016777575,0.017378792,0.01094259,0.0021558006,0.0011502556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001077145,0.00006307973,0.0072061066,0.0001656303,0.000032264958,0.00041334136,0.01249655,0.001555464,0.002594624,0.94357127,0.00044353004,0.031350315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006064596,0.00013255433,0.009940584,0.00019502275,0.00006326174,0.00059194374,0.015012589,0.005311898,0.0034595898,0.92801565,0.03715672,0.000059542483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002736382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047092515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014701437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003362385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023701591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07774961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751853820","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3906","title":"Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Library science; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7298564952173201,"score_gpt":0.6544215829644491,"score_spread":0.07543491225287102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751853820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024342056,0.05120273,0.03722023,0.665798,0.003377422,0.00026685634,0.0009946377,0.00076673616,0.21603143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7145788,0.12677819,0.043145716,0.06773299,0.012437421,0.00059405144,0.0008629569,0.0010182343,0.03285163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8847392,0.07921763,0.0069162077,0.0034449163,0.022596218,0.003085764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75757974,0.14907062,0.015467385,0.0077223354,0.056473248,0.01368658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07165586,0.0011609187,0.0012060795,0.018723192,0.005604918,0.028529096,0.0028146356,0.004781887,0.0055782935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12405425,0.0006720354,0.0009040143,0.02436068,0.014540054,0.030186264,0.007991922,0.0077821566,0.0021730505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007360007,0.00025286002,0.018156853,0.0024807856,0.00010204724,0.0004522439,0.043243226,0.0011728479,0.001077475,0.5928508,0.10096844,0.23916881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016608581,0.00034048661,0.00808891,0.0031214356,0.00009037257,0.00056626485,0.060439095,0.0010764784,0.0022081216,0.14235607,0.78157866,0.00011750778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085425535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006019532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019196045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02833295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37895697},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2753955980","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2182","title":"Measuring Cost per Use of Library-Funded Open Access Article Processing Charges: Examination and Implications of One Method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Payment; Publishing; Actuarial science; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.8868527694239678,"score_gpt":0.6048805113465975,"score_spread":0.28197225807737036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753955980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42593607,0.02446954,0.40544617,0.01590537,0.0016815229,0.004262353,0.008226107,0.0011197064,0.112953186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8027827,0.0040322696,0.1827289,0.00095275027,0.00030265073,0.0029802183,0.0015159852,0.00038818826,0.004316312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8206685,0.090653926,0.009914986,0.008453378,0.06867607,0.0016330497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42719704,0.4435196,0.056568276,0.027250994,0.04378864,0.0016754693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07789196,0.0017726177,0.0018416106,0.0140480455,0.0015259498,0.009733622,0.003850327,0.0019420933,0.0050978637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32057333,0.0010441248,0.004218209,0.026310692,0.0037993253,0.011493349,0.004823583,0.0027373116,0.0010329506],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012940473,0.0009037931,0.3771197,0.0039329524,0.0030642939,0.0002179947,0.00307683,0.014791041,0.00066910643,0.086333886,0.011019753,0.4975767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031345373,0.0055167754,0.66349715,0.007148111,0.0025922996,0.002804977,0.0073527438,0.12151316,0.008113098,0.10549021,0.07438699,0.0012709297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008779436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077447705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99614966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018536048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00790301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756363584","doi":"10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135097","title":"Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Publication; Medicine; Publishing; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6403992013114378,"score_gpt":0.5497187768184835,"score_spread":0.09068042449295433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756363584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915952,0.00096362404,0.0007486476,0.0021661338,0.0002510084,0.00014592678,0.000075415424,0.000060064634,0.0039941217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897077,0.00096447224,0.001359764,0.0019513931,0.00036674523,0.00024062108,0.00012332824,0.000059992053,0.0052260994],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806214,0.013040499,0.0013050507,0.0007791521,0.0028577715,0.0013961829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021987,0.04043412,0.020152822,0.0034198067,0.00880302,0.02499157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01802447,0.0004908281,0.0006769016,0.0013987855,0.0042334925,0.0054155793,0.0012155547,0.0017267426,0.0059984643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08339478,0.0005139947,0.0003952478,0.0011300908,0.0017857279,0.0030861015,0.0055116704,0.0023291537,0.0024812862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011769785,0.0025363662,0.33060133,0.0008072536,0.00008682477,0.009572651,0.5128925,0.00010012473,0.003785976,0.00081008003,0.015638923,0.12199093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011830482,0.0040664943,0.23410472,0.000598736,0.000070815986,0.014548318,0.6617997,0.0003926921,0.0017935182,0.00071690005,0.08154237,0.00024740258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005236841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011175632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99827325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001188734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029145828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09532368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756498337","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2019.491","title":"Predatory publications in evidence syntheses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Medical Library Association","keywords":"Checklist; Publication; Systematic review; Grey literature; Peer review; Publishing; MEDLINE; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4347540435894559,"score_gpt":0.5258972688182807,"score_spread":0.09114322522882479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756498337","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050558615,0.62769693,0.0792263,0.15420268,0.024392707,0.009606348,0.0023442279,0.0007557038,0.051216517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56192905,0.20387109,0.14967583,0.0436663,0.0148757305,0.01791602,0.0013428618,0.0007209048,0.006002303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.21451958,0.5124598,0.13489926,0.020874536,0.11481186,0.0024349673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04707691,0.7560248,0.12628521,0.038708683,0.03058694,0.0013175644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.46639466,0.0017295115,0.0055653974,0.035381585,0.0062054754,0.023792917,0.0041256314,0.0076775593,0.012856029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8330272,0.0032830127,0.0033407612,0.047800455,0.01980556,0.022027364,0.01715161,0.0062949075,0.0025940286],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009971551,0.00025723662,0.07989072,0.22238816,0.009915465,0.0016163444,0.057514213,0.0012242259,0.0014422527,0.122395225,0.061269097,0.44108996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067315326,0.0006205576,0.041244734,0.4231061,0.0071118446,0.0036410836,0.018370215,0.0036541931,0.002988839,0.18666728,0.31152466,0.00039733166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021087665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003982705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99232244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013596303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029977575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6580304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759024906","doi":"","title":"Pratiques de publication, dépôt institutionnel et perception du libre accès : enquête auprès des chercheuses et chercheurs de l’Université Laval (Québec)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.3489982636259524,"score_gpt":0.4770851894113248,"score_spread":0.1280869257853724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759024906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493047,0.0033474832,0.00047348873,0.018187651,0.000251371,0.00009946557,0.00044167394,0.00007779761,0.027816428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488697,0.002461542,0.00050276594,0.0018360701,0.00008559137,0.00008873896,0.00022813049,0.000046464178,0.04588091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98841256,0.0039743776,0.0006095321,0.0006650873,0.004451151,0.001887253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153771,0.018080406,0.01019072,0.0013787221,0.03450104,0.020472025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014178277,0.00023743033,0.00057944324,0.002786104,0.01304656,0.011663791,0.0015082979,0.0016154689,0.017241493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042477217,0.0003811549,0.00029016472,0.0058798585,0.004032535,0.004316405,0.0041171396,0.0020029577,0.0021370875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021764712,0.00016408417,0.16300969,0.00045849194,0.000032405813,0.0010030771,0.7404295,0.000089447596,0.0010142011,0.0034051484,0.02923995,0.060936432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016755726,0.00012472675,0.20306434,0.0004576905,0.000018248735,0.00018436849,0.66612613,0.00017195342,0.00033138206,0.00025913975,0.12915102,0.00009426891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78824115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8731344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043751188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072461784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42601186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760878772","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2017.1408289","title":"Managing the transition to open access publishing: a psychological perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Exeter; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Open access publishing; Face (sociological concept); Transition (genetics); Peer pressure; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8627634791726088,"score_gpt":0.7134585090501455,"score_spread":0.14930497012246324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760878772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.588651,0.0030746525,0.013095722,0.21449718,0.0006106587,0.000091958114,0.000053227566,0.000048461614,0.17987718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337834,0.00067356596,0.0009867914,0.0032393262,0.000104242834,0.000018366256,0.000008316557,0.000005973954,0.0015852171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880019,0.00750124,0.0003385523,0.00055285834,0.002163988,0.001441582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601631,0.019537445,0.0068574348,0.00089454744,0.003752118,0.00879531],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013012509,0.00020385724,0.00026494748,0.0022169075,0.0055844835,0.017059935,0.0011223423,0.0034754022,0.0029266498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025585605,0.00025207494,0.00036422737,0.0017441406,0.02461789,0.007594573,0.0058335913,0.0060762893,0.00038117942],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017893969,0.0013243199,0.065164216,0.0004425507,0.00013532478,0.0019115846,0.31879908,0.00084447983,0.0026002857,0.53576154,0.009871529,0.06296622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006370103,0.00035221802,0.03424515,0.00045909276,0.00004637576,0.0011567071,0.6592552,0.0016654168,0.00083678064,0.21704243,0.08475729,0.00011966873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017669786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019226574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99887764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043745954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076652872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068817556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762227057","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.008","title":"Mapping science using Library of Congress Subject Headings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library of congress; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Library of Congress Classification; Data science; Library classification","score_opus":0.6384368990329121,"score_gpt":0.5833211230820153,"score_spread":0.055115775950896784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762227057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32096753,0.044736806,0.077379405,0.005057373,0.0025712978,0.0013622189,0.29564008,0.0059156404,0.24636964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6428392,0.03223612,0.16749221,0.00067804323,0.0015332527,0.0019322608,0.12872742,0.000712313,0.02384918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934296,0.0016994326,0.0015913284,0.00076618494,0.0021549263,0.00035864796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709598,0.013340526,0.00643629,0.0024861495,0.0059563206,0.0008209745],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047026104,0.00090052735,0.0010686402,0.15042222,0.001575557,0.009952385,0.0006598224,0.0008472997,0.017122937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038123,0.0002990892,0.0013427327,0.17744502,0.00061935704,0.005432299,0.0029545983,0.0006422146,0.005007069],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028149958,0.00015034803,0.11241257,0.009709301,0.0010533544,0.0003867369,0.004901415,0.0020800459,0.0065174964,0.052385725,0.058780026,0.75134146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089394984,0.0002588963,0.17645277,0.0024883277,0.0011281435,0.00064809783,0.01063823,0.0051614693,0.010571923,0.03920665,0.75320005,0.00015598853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021073753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01630556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8495778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019269327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077847005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05728191},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2762362539","doi":"10.1177/1056492617726270","title":"Escape From Abilene: The Developmental Opportunity of the Review Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Institution; Construct (python library); Unintended consequences; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Process (computing); State (computer science); Public relations; Work (physics); Scale (ratio); Political science; Management; Social science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.713413562543332,"score_gpt":0.5924005284305639,"score_spread":0.12101303411276809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762362539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14291215,0.012582291,0.27200493,0.41107276,0.004187698,0.000718084,0.00015387312,0.0011245355,0.15524371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979439,0.002263871,0.07646665,0.011010239,0.0008166017,0.00067858706,0.000052565745,0.00038486064,0.0103826495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8331992,0.13239251,0.004449313,0.008080203,0.018075243,0.003803511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63809437,0.26371512,0.017476307,0.0353623,0.028491562,0.01686025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19107825,0.00056082435,0.0008534124,0.005541725,0.014560189,0.032445222,0.004144389,0.0085599,0.004185784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32302815,0.0011463712,0.0010109902,0.0031008436,0.055995423,0.032358907,0.02260947,0.0110171605,0.0016344228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007274175,0.000096830365,0.0038384784,0.00032429022,0.000053955562,0.0008816433,0.121697076,0.0004383387,0.00085875794,0.7889383,0.011615185,0.07118438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006930989,0.00017299988,0.0022169214,0.0007113958,0.000022730985,0.0009033366,0.054681905,0.0014531247,0.0012882089,0.6931215,0.2452027,0.00015585967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024858117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029823866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80892175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009107185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039084632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763328223","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0185578","title":"Beyond funding: Acknowledgement patterns in biomedical, natural and social sciences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa; University of Pennsylvania; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Discipline; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.7192005164441284,"score_gpt":0.5602536689157159,"score_spread":0.15894684752841248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763328223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94969916,0.00911841,0.010534852,0.0069226194,0.00023819118,0.00014402963,0.0040262192,0.00024515856,0.01907124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911907,0.0014212962,0.0037632796,0.00028017533,0.00015588649,0.00012780643,0.0017616056,0.00007325928,0.0012261188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664818,0.014389271,0.0075482517,0.0037207976,0.006155359,0.0017044827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71286684,0.17660344,0.07264057,0.013127147,0.019720696,0.0050412663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023266582,0.0002990587,0.0007289887,0.023982419,0.0017549569,0.0043563307,0.0012215863,0.0010227794,0.005024243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18053295,0.00030218644,0.00051747094,0.04088015,0.0028280767,0.007513958,0.008133321,0.0009224183,0.0008819843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006607564,0.00008468767,0.6863027,0.0030742774,0.00035100058,0.00055802416,0.08392436,0.00045592626,0.0026223885,0.029273534,0.010468579,0.1822238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050772676,0.0001060325,0.7988244,0.0017834236,0.00018512689,0.001070878,0.08871942,0.0018665832,0.0013100541,0.039048776,0.06689446,0.00014004501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043506157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97673345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019718336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027016697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123046935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765334272","doi":"10.14429/djlit.37.5.11573","title":"Metamaterials Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2007-16","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; Library science; China; Metamaterial; Web of science; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Physics; Computer science; Law; Optics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5649173997868181,"score_gpt":0.5944565569745612,"score_spread":0.029539157187743137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765334272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124798,0.025063945,0.0019761464,0.0037948287,0.00048096367,0.00041367818,0.29723427,0.00090482424,0.057651553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916577,0.025168767,0.0031233525,0.0004538106,0.0008736182,0.000571165,0.2687822,0.00024938324,0.009120073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894326,0.0011674835,0.0022238814,0.0008713198,0.005632548,0.000672137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959338,0.0106463,0.012530759,0.0024299247,0.01349058,0.0015644429],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007820032,0.00085086364,0.0010767529,0.085794255,0.00090711185,0.005138994,0.00085729477,0.00071660924,0.003162613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035822876,0.0002530893,0.0016807361,0.19991718,0.00070670125,0.004183356,0.0030445708,0.00051804987,0.0020921642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039056214,0.00016702502,0.649797,0.0062568034,0.0012923118,0.00077012554,0.003038554,0.0030501583,0.0012059337,0.0057075615,0.08533734,0.24298668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016014947,0.00009305892,0.9232859,0.00057903765,0.00026166535,0.0004652418,0.0026337442,0.0014326713,0.00084865844,0.0007882695,0.06954549,0.000050280916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062810895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005337413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91420573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002716667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039624567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041356742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765390333","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0112","title":"Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Originality; Bibliographic database; Search engine indexing; Subject (documents); Web of science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.638216984837964,"score_gpt":0.6510249154957314,"score_spread":0.012807930657767419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765390333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4615431,0.24612916,0.07907705,0.049740493,0.0022203084,0.0046121264,0.012742059,0.0015002082,0.14243549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76156294,0.03963731,0.18127075,0.0064481543,0.0007023038,0.0027187474,0.0046250806,0.0005201742,0.0025144566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8288185,0.082766496,0.030120516,0.0068476675,0.04851346,0.002933333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48760703,0.40373605,0.041417625,0.019683007,0.04408125,0.0034751173],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1094698,0.00089032727,0.0033360254,0.058487978,0.004477206,0.026210075,0.003858159,0.0024787653,0.0072350823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48481375,0.0010229382,0.002914626,0.058632158,0.002994729,0.021824194,0.007600868,0.001996062,0.0022326962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018932882,0.0004819225,0.10919913,0.022336764,0.002081226,0.0002580741,0.0067598876,0.0014878585,0.0027537765,0.037942436,0.020649364,0.7941564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078423135,0.0035932525,0.37010306,0.08937283,0.008799553,0.004149086,0.08094245,0.016692966,0.02020374,0.17549372,0.22863838,0.001226664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036235065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007800304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94151205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066299518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076101464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5789386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765672937","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-5507","title":"Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Computer science; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Advertising; Law; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.5203472843812312,"score_gpt":0.5291059132112108,"score_spread":0.008758628829979576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765672937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066239615,0.004196205,0.014235378,0.8569347,0.013435902,0.00021880669,0.00020927799,0.000879107,0.10326661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20225546,0.007223746,0.027551223,0.5767366,0.021807335,0.0010171484,0.00042219603,0.002301585,0.16068472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8547326,0.05735106,0.010327282,0.012946096,0.059322827,0.0053201984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.481765,0.2628732,0.056810424,0.06044095,0.1059845,0.032125916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13426575,0.000936907,0.0019375106,0.005604485,0.014283464,0.028108807,0.0048461338,0.01917094,0.046876136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47505346,0.0015637066,0.0016453079,0.010495195,0.023960633,0.029321456,0.011130891,0.020239243,0.03303741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029950263,0.00018040698,0.010363564,0.0006549508,0.00014708066,0.0015233974,0.013961607,0.00031007483,0.0006138551,0.23551723,0.6414563,0.09497207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013704799,0.00014025772,0.0024299219,0.00075759,0.000055310273,0.002188458,0.0068249977,0.0007149239,0.00079945143,0.15867506,0.82711756,0.00015946709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010095598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009865372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98082906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010219506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02080369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71007365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765699166","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.89","title":"Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam","keywords":"Publishing; Subsidy; Business; Developing country; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.7472106280624337,"score_gpt":0.6125763640191498,"score_spread":0.13463426404328382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765699166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76863235,0.009215902,0.017798187,0.049382087,0.0011127525,0.00047098173,0.0028181905,0.00041290122,0.1501567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873239,0.00143476,0.0039394298,0.0035348164,0.0003309267,0.00008631241,0.00047259973,0.0000895088,0.00278767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788396,0.0055296654,0.0020616623,0.0018631641,0.0095054675,0.002200624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8825275,0.047619168,0.03293659,0.016080158,0.0127085205,0.008128099],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0211289,0.00030490037,0.0008555146,0.004955551,0.0020170049,0.012767882,0.0011234991,0.0012193467,0.008878477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091987595,0.00032734612,0.00051767076,0.013799699,0.0047025173,0.007091662,0.006807197,0.00217845,0.0011856586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008182336,0.00015654971,0.5023329,0.0020785287,0.0006032016,0.0016859855,0.01264563,0.0012501209,0.002640472,0.1848072,0.026861958,0.26411924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019373352,0.00034661742,0.66704357,0.0022759752,0.0002663869,0.0029715612,0.0151759405,0.0024058172,0.004051253,0.088929355,0.216191,0.00014878862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046075815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005320287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99504447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044812015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11174166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765709240","doi":"10.1188/17.onf.641-642","title":"The Predatory Journal Issue: Part II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oncology nursing forum","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CancerCare Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Morning; Medicine; Focus (optics); Medical education; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.5582211958695689,"score_gpt":0.6374948490324746,"score_spread":0.07927365316290569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765709240","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074506085,0.020216186,0.0003920261,0.10362168,0.81567585,0.00029886837,0.0009896033,0.0003503318,0.057710383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006253808,0.025047105,0.0006903976,0.061911058,0.6502467,0.0004539853,0.0015624027,0.0007771897,0.25305736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273056,0.00084846874,0.0006459484,0.000614552,0.0045077503,0.0006526919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571296,0.0077596656,0.002762783,0.002389834,0.019930007,0.010028168],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00867544,0.0016561358,0.0018145088,0.0060694907,0.0041932524,0.018995754,0.002500996,0.0064485576,0.13649644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04182668,0.0010436067,0.001380149,0.004704546,0.0029122862,0.005491933,0.0035484687,0.0053706346,0.08414453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021630363,0.000028637653,0.00022361544,0.00021552395,0.0000062706067,0.00005469406,0.000020753387,0.000010000029,0.000087891596,0.00045511863,0.9865131,0.012362839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013878929,0.0000322039,0.0016466507,0.00048472607,0.000008225448,0.00013634074,0.00009660825,0.000025732941,0.000074824566,0.00051306543,0.99695575,0.000011984815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023086942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059436015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99355143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050083427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008269345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45662606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766272051","doi":"10.1002/asi.24130","title":"Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Surrey; Queen's University; Swansea University; Durham University; University of Bristol; Cardiff University; Loughborough University; University of Glasgow; University of Nottingham; University of Leeds; University of Aberdeen; Newcastle University; University of Reading; University of Warwick; University of Oxford; University of Dundee; Queen Mary University of London; Imperial College London; Bangor University; Queen's University Belfast; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; University College London; University of Southampton; University of Birmingham; University of Leicester; University of Exeter; London School of Economics and Political Science; King's College London","keywords":"Excellence; Stability (learning theory); Uncorrelated; Isomorphism (crystallography); Incentive; Homogeneous; Statistical significance; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3199335946386695,"score_gpt":0.49281921910728077,"score_spread":0.17288562446861128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766272051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726237,0.00171014,0.0081478255,0.0008126345,0.0002915477,0.00029965484,0.005013883,0.00014587947,0.010954712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955369,0.000138263,0.0018466024,0.000057282705,0.00008118726,0.00031501465,0.0011203341,0.000065541244,0.0008389222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95677716,0.027915971,0.0022583762,0.005415437,0.0060277744,0.0016053627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6793188,0.2980226,0.009645788,0.0071885763,0.0029661406,0.0028580208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02621026,0.0008772902,0.0014493495,0.009299627,0.00066136266,0.0018792383,0.0012321514,0.0013573937,0.01272372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11029371,0.00027842674,0.0026045563,0.006964844,0.0036828667,0.0029733244,0.0027737948,0.002926814,0.00081979536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007567664,0.0007069523,0.90159565,0.0012849137,0.01827717,0.00090813794,0.0031783548,0.0039643156,0.0061904914,0.013096743,0.0061045163,0.0371251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003583454,0.0019941607,0.97042936,0.00013855517,0.0028418985,0.00033078788,0.0029638857,0.00767982,0.002315578,0.0076831947,0.0031808363,0.0000835548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021323124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012466557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99070036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007005939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006320438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13861477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766307773","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.103","title":"Adoption of Open Access Publishing by Academic Researchers in Kenya","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Publication; Publishing; Accreditation; Public relations; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.8470049518652517,"score_gpt":0.6541268974003143,"score_spread":0.19287805446493744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766307773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753205,0.002827338,0.00031210904,0.0067443973,0.00006650333,0.00009091028,0.00006325659,0.0000091185575,0.014565863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942017,0.0025298593,0.0006135707,0.00089364935,0.000028610782,0.00004166149,0.000025960488,0.0000050348585,0.0016599096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98536634,0.006272335,0.0015647897,0.00088018546,0.0045131682,0.0014032732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92272484,0.035768222,0.024049958,0.0027485734,0.0078354925,0.0068730037],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017087832,0.00016867141,0.00040245624,0.0033014116,0.006926702,0.008981221,0.0010966684,0.0015809474,0.003251921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051375408,0.00050278055,0.00023325748,0.0052359747,0.0042626224,0.0057060993,0.004566452,0.0014382572,0.0003180126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029102125,0.0002593723,0.3519283,0.001055429,0.00008133365,0.0028732577,0.5033639,0.00013760552,0.0038145334,0.016891168,0.0029573063,0.11634672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007420419,0.00045845876,0.25492033,0.0014778082,0.00008810495,0.0024699704,0.6367144,0.00037099834,0.0012855016,0.0040499223,0.0978898,0.00020045701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015511832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025839912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99890333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005640336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013269517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09037018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766631362","doi":"10.1007/s40037-017-0381-x","title":"Predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: Perspectives and implications for novice researchers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; The Quebec Population Health Research Network","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.5267025819357913,"score_gpt":0.6044501190546383,"score_spread":0.07774753711884697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766631362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023434871,0.0007811378,0.000031816224,0.996194,0.0016592529,0.0000013711427,0.0000069283947,0.0000028642412,0.0010882653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010141857,0.0019899255,0.00019323907,0.9635579,0.021390708,0.000017165836,0.000012961332,0.000016221391,0.0026800816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718023,0.009220224,0.0028228064,0.002726846,0.0103479875,0.0030798556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6689502,0.26525107,0.013233151,0.006009411,0.02620799,0.020348186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036501892,0.0006011792,0.001748161,0.0022083016,0.010085411,0.020823922,0.0044954233,0.111219026,0.0110920975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20024922,0.0007674288,0.0014860278,0.003035589,0.016271178,0.015853008,0.0068260785,0.070520364,0.0041238647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087820554,0.000078360055,0.0028074812,0.00017696137,0.00004038811,0.0038946394,0.0017455495,0.00009916925,0.00016509091,0.06630675,0.90210474,0.022492966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022100874,0.00007560019,0.0027381764,0.0012954006,0.00007113599,0.003761411,0.0076152203,0.00063820253,0.00037425896,0.16314681,0.81986743,0.00019542643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069180513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01606246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009791649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016912432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19304281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766654013","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.1","title":"Special Issue on Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8042926188935705,"score_gpt":0.6550944232339806,"score_spread":0.14919819565958992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766654013","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023983768,0.007557819,0.00065704435,0.035710316,0.92530084,0.000100451936,0.00038019542,0.0003088244,0.02974482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021439646,0.0074340464,0.00049417344,0.014128654,0.8498085,0.0001060027,0.0004845885,0.00047864742,0.12492131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272764,0.0006831129,0.00067403755,0.001039636,0.0040413514,0.0008341784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617989,0.008744942,0.0029497847,0.0032730764,0.012795622,0.010437673],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076941284,0.0018325155,0.0026647993,0.0047845724,0.0046721776,0.015238965,0.0026385642,0.0075528077,0.19042143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02322908,0.0008637526,0.0017239271,0.0023253441,0.002463792,0.00767521,0.0054060076,0.008658185,0.07286364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019876574,0.000026485608,0.00006431993,0.00016492729,0.000005596834,0.00006345102,0.000032213884,0.00001688105,0.00016578294,0.0024101627,0.98027956,0.016750745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065124223,0.000027422897,0.0002798958,0.00016274163,0.000004968281,0.00016844907,0.0000338542,0.000034445882,0.00008119265,0.0012748212,0.9979176,0.000008099492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074929005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002024866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025150473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050716614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63702315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766781696","doi":"10.2214/ajr.17.18077","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Manuscript Characteristics That Influence Citations: A Comparison of Six Major Radiology Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Roentgenology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Medical physics; Library science; Radiology; Computer science","score_opus":0.42414929523449185,"score_gpt":0.5606304783726436,"score_spread":0.13648118313815172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766781696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99001557,0.004235197,0.001568405,0.00033590884,0.000084727835,0.00016781456,0.0012623984,0.00006662286,0.0022633849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644333,0.0009925768,0.0011378556,0.000033913944,0.00014185577,0.00010372314,0.00090352225,0.000015868489,0.00022750373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.978442,0.0068723746,0.0059626144,0.0011610977,0.007086454,0.00047551843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76758796,0.124819964,0.069253765,0.005294644,0.029828323,0.0032153109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018711101,0.00050378556,0.0013746782,0.03388288,0.0010063272,0.003879146,0.00080888247,0.00065390876,0.0020507786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16406634,0.00020279697,0.0019052867,0.036559045,0.00071863725,0.002628432,0.0016311746,0.00031349808,0.00059800246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069026445,0.00016264812,0.945026,0.00090797996,0.0010606921,0.00013247611,0.00091194274,0.00047090667,0.0008311648,0.0002447333,0.0007288796,0.04883242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007158758,0.00071860466,0.9900922,0.0002043296,0.0006904133,0.00060312083,0.0020584266,0.0017580598,0.0012429017,0.0005706768,0.0019448955,0.000044694665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008661122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010095696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013884796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023323547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098954976},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2766932290","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.5","title":"Traditional versus Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing: An Economic Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misinformation; Electronic publishing; Scholarly communication; Perspective (graphical); Open access publishing; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.8658095751057954,"score_gpt":0.6303082985146546,"score_spread":0.23550127659114073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766932290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17805542,0.0499257,0.14090084,0.10954782,0.0017828757,0.0005607911,0.0010133907,0.00012071779,0.51809245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427169,0.023027997,0.012218623,0.0018235799,0.0021254816,0.00022385217,0.0001560923,0.000041067837,0.017666511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298084,0.0029011192,0.00021735216,0.00033210655,0.003002299,0.0005663164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963295,0.030546093,0.002644482,0.000807015,0.0016531536,0.001054184],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007957962,0.00063869817,0.0013078238,0.0038638262,0.0012267645,0.01090852,0.0018388701,0.004692772,0.010886471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023464762,0.00053463964,0.0011430111,0.004346468,0.006685282,0.011854176,0.002474442,0.0033319346,0.0011499884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011323043,0.00014152253,0.0013322689,0.00020296598,0.0000578057,0.00010892692,0.00012195514,0.013349137,0.00015963802,0.9674526,0.0020798298,0.014880292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009457048,0.00024359026,0.0030452663,0.00039234615,0.000082562656,0.00019289232,0.0011388846,0.059858065,0.0003847641,0.9135857,0.020907138,0.00007426767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019206675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00205615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005372273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025976507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042086244},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2767220712","doi":"10.31468/cjsdwr.449","title":"The Rhetoric of Science: Authority and Duty in an Article from the Exact Sciences","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Duty; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Law; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.573018254361351,"score_gpt":0.608334703307705,"score_spread":0.035316448946353995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767220712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14154989,0.064759046,0.031159038,0.23736365,0.0092560565,0.00010074565,0.00016757275,0.00013002887,0.5155139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621582,0.008678032,0.004077573,0.0077897054,0.0027775925,0.00004113237,0.000046160705,0.00008941551,0.014342075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881738,0.008456861,0.0004162781,0.0004310827,0.0021032037,0.00041885182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95274943,0.042969882,0.0011919655,0.0005882343,0.0019931095,0.0005073105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007298472,0.00035206354,0.00057693693,0.0057435036,0.0063599534,0.015859146,0.00044655622,0.0023229127,0.0015697313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027175736,0.00016344039,0.00022479885,0.004395578,0.02355828,0.0071489527,0.0031573302,0.0022138362,0.00026457995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060882758,0.000010952341,0.00055315957,0.00023007373,0.000007875528,0.00028559312,0.11201178,0.00011635341,0.00029965947,0.8533961,0.011867274,0.021160308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020773234,0.000040370247,0.0017038241,0.00092306203,0.000020560257,0.0005333421,0.06271386,0.000553299,0.0009281492,0.21039107,0.72213686,0.000034867673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049866065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059817843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99364007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006040555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00509185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043827534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767442756","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scx074","title":"Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Excellence; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Perception; Public relations; Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.7093521243612279,"score_gpt":0.6187410226984775,"score_spread":0.09061110166275033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767442756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82425195,0.008685169,0.0010608193,0.071232796,0.00021779857,0.00008022218,0.00016116333,0.00003002682,0.09428006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471575,0.0028459914,0.00032822782,0.00074149144,0.000058854177,0.000022014905,0.000025069887,0.0000070969986,0.0012556162],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728593,0.01556672,0.0018479201,0.0009224959,0.0037344203,0.005069041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94748217,0.021202624,0.01179229,0.0012284848,0.0045090998,0.013785309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029267233,0.00028499577,0.0004201999,0.003756652,0.005770945,0.012563936,0.0008653557,0.0015672365,0.0033547126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052826572,0.0002486771,0.00030278342,0.006140146,0.00808439,0.0076961713,0.0085327085,0.0019364329,0.00037990787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003350994,0.00045032383,0.23930985,0.0019074851,0.00012557757,0.0014704283,0.3034845,0.001568782,0.002542502,0.2737706,0.014330886,0.16070402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004819755,0.00042408265,0.21907604,0.0023260072,0.000044363318,0.00082915934,0.5627981,0.0010465176,0.0010101302,0.044288307,0.16797255,0.00013653062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068013063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051919017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99624336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007231593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014393547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15478182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767448821","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4229","title":"Chapitre 6. Le système universitaire canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.15945941020929205,"score_gpt":0.33781912024609545,"score_spread":0.1783597100368034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767448821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007422598,0.03404822,0.008030967,0.012789811,0.0011109544,0.000076725875,0.0011684498,0.00013630623,0.935216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3113338,0.061949383,0.01416375,0.005908901,0.0019396909,0.00025201944,0.0023087622,0.0002513494,0.6018923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991186,0.0002903119,0.000041962146,0.00015124658,0.00026900615,0.00012887524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994387,0.00023399892,0.000039402228,0.00006214099,0.00017754601,0.000048231886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072805875,0.00047865324,0.00038959348,0.0023229106,0.003344305,0.006546018,0.0006083878,0.0014651318,0.04028961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015130622,0.00024944718,0.0005258068,0.0042131767,0.0026955532,0.003133821,0.0015060782,0.0026230824,0.0077516814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008352206,0.000011833703,0.0008290364,0.00018182081,0.000008966072,0.0001001948,0.00297437,0.00046772242,0.00015930466,0.94148207,0.030113181,0.023663182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024511464,0.000008520378,0.0023274946,0.00028348752,0.00000585992,0.00014668563,0.0013649896,0.00022331909,0.0001520624,0.056807395,0.9386646,0.000013120949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0695842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06536134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008716397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041934536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13835835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767505012","doi":"10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.4.0505","title":"Between Pink Noise and White Noise: A Digital History of <i>The American Journal of Psychology</i> and <i>Psychological Review</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Group cohesiveness; Reading (process); White (mutation); White noise; Noise (video); Psychological research; Social psychology; Statistics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4051001427254156,"score_gpt":0.5601568046886629,"score_spread":0.1550566619632473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767505012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62404627,0.12003275,0.0061576082,0.075421125,0.00933752,0.00010455531,0.00917691,0.0006520073,0.15507117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95325977,0.022437619,0.0013292334,0.003564317,0.0048928293,0.0000410002,0.001344643,0.00016180087,0.012968807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793625,0.0005396829,0.00020598338,0.0002958163,0.00086661224,0.00015565561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640657,0.020374747,0.0061057247,0.0013620855,0.006147688,0.0019440581],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003253725,0.00015052146,0.00028109853,0.007571492,0.0011806593,0.0044434536,0.00024420462,0.0008361712,0.0057776985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03394618,0.00022340189,0.00021260964,0.010484337,0.0014154441,0.0039854525,0.0017207355,0.0011995775,0.0015654371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011130411,0.00017609322,0.16113472,0.0026824635,0.00022623801,0.0024012034,0.027367858,0.0010368116,0.004697537,0.04543275,0.22903854,0.5246928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021529331,0.00018056604,0.3927774,0.0014557004,0.0001224003,0.0018428584,0.013492866,0.0010894065,0.0018544069,0.008185372,0.57883257,0.00014486475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002846371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055888467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014992581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087863876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019328296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768805826","doi":"10.1007/s00167-017-4801-6","title":"Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995–2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Medicine; Sports medicine; Arthroscopy; Orthopedic surgery; Family medicine; General surgery; Physical therapy; Surgery","score_opus":0.9695522713062247,"score_gpt":0.7202800005152287,"score_spread":0.249272270790996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768805826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019233162,0.9613407,0.0007824701,0.0050147763,0.0009394666,0.0008776296,0.00890162,0.000050017916,0.0028601934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29028115,0.68257755,0.009467237,0.004208945,0.0012278733,0.0034439594,0.0075035524,0.0001114825,0.0011783139],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9220539,0.010341882,0.048707087,0.0039361636,0.013471508,0.0014896513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63238484,0.15662692,0.13563268,0.0072617168,0.063617416,0.0044763256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039338503,0.0012559353,0.0040275496,0.036968667,0.0015317308,0.009197213,0.0024452077,0.0034403887,0.0091245165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24403618,0.001266897,0.0064770384,0.0388606,0.0021229328,0.0062326468,0.0033223727,0.0021056281,0.0015195336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021809626,0.00007479106,0.15660295,0.6762703,0.019015849,0.0006892261,0.0017090441,0.00035417738,0.0013509792,0.0010967243,0.014167944,0.12648714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006160982,0.00051298086,0.17786255,0.7350513,0.028040046,0.0025315864,0.0018418458,0.00025158186,0.00087043963,0.0019656136,0.050336804,0.000119165365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007963679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014133811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96303135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010438277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018146576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20804435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773035543","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v10i4.394","title":"Incentivizing Peer Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Bodywork; Peer review; Certification; Medical education; Technical peer review; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6717042853872577,"score_gpt":0.7150705398290771,"score_spread":0.04336625444181941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773035543","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001094341,0.0222276,0.011343802,0.33626208,0.6069044,0.00044812926,0.00015300614,0.0011047174,0.020462018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027217282,0.025848089,0.01355538,0.12018853,0.77410376,0.00077227305,0.00024032204,0.0010710851,0.037003327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.74913704,0.083349116,0.02854802,0.013933853,0.119080946,0.005951086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28891757,0.38145205,0.04375122,0.04474534,0.20423642,0.036897477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15993485,0.0019176068,0.0021678961,0.0058393404,0.0040810653,0.022018943,0.0055692885,0.014794837,0.015039592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54982054,0.0013935978,0.0016979148,0.0030120984,0.006933551,0.013729821,0.010012286,0.019704279,0.014610856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055973233,0.000028766397,0.00031331586,0.0011897949,0.00009821098,0.00017336401,0.00041233283,0.0001692899,0.00046861413,0.016413903,0.9203239,0.06035252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052308005,0.000023840088,0.0005077877,0.000681139,0.000036960962,0.00018405991,0.00015373825,0.0004335779,0.00028290332,0.012624896,0.98497933,0.000039390015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000861755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030388623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005638705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022772841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84582645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773409128","doi":"10.1002/asi.23985","title":"A critical evaluation of expert survey‐based journal rankings: The role of personal research interests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Intellectual capital; Journal ranking; eHealth; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Library science; Health care; Citation","score_opus":0.5920249208423625,"score_gpt":0.6326843248149483,"score_spread":0.04065940397258583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773409128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8111309,0.010849337,0.12149889,0.007411681,0.003017203,0.009062592,0.003508057,0.0004247938,0.033096522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578768,0.00065328897,0.03497403,0.0011293873,0.00057217036,0.0030409745,0.0006053986,0.00010907854,0.001038879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.32430848,0.49045104,0.058560263,0.017627759,0.1062769,0.0027755746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.041470755,0.81631494,0.056411114,0.021823052,0.06256493,0.001415242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5407692,0.0012077867,0.0020231234,0.01698718,0.0032117348,0.005618936,0.0028042586,0.0016367876,0.0031419978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82613796,0.000653576,0.0030829858,0.011622006,0.005849786,0.0047160187,0.0034594021,0.001377278,0.00046486576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011814894,0.00069549395,0.67309034,0.011002414,0.010851711,0.0005666683,0.044405647,0.0032949718,0.0027368334,0.018980911,0.016485333,0.20607467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022000119,0.012421879,0.8082132,0.0062996815,0.008882843,0.0018734318,0.036044646,0.03310003,0.015783168,0.02260872,0.051431224,0.0011411704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003321891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004543844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052570305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054667103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5663134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774127519","doi":"10.4224/12340916","title":"National Research Council Canada: annual report 2006-2007: financial statements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research council; Business; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8148328827537024,"score_gpt":0.650017250377239,"score_spread":0.16481563237646335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774127519","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008996874,0.008408303,0.0021161214,0.13784,0.01209284,0.0013008852,0.6674322,0.002471518,0.15934138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035875406,0.016886374,0.015746452,0.013008307,0.0017755931,0.0010345038,0.29810518,0.0015486459,0.6160195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9346048,0.0019280975,0.0031863041,0.0011710624,0.0538162,0.00529349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6871375,0.010287181,0.007258953,0.0037769875,0.27853394,0.013005399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023806099,0.0023747324,0.0031740675,0.022733347,0.0077826353,0.014344761,0.0064672786,0.0074927905,0.029630825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08736674,0.0024420181,0.0014357558,0.045486197,0.0029559515,0.004917991,0.0036695546,0.0068438067,0.022246514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000728701,0.0000545354,0.002960626,0.00021543472,0.00002511514,0.000041319345,0.00006870568,0.00019665339,0.000102545084,0.0038732581,0.98376197,0.008626973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012336436,0.00003014111,0.04581108,0.00055020995,0.00010156233,0.0000841661,0.0005314517,0.0012788184,0.00142028,0.002029414,0.94787216,0.00016739928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98046243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8898495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11015053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5735867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775516587","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2593-6","title":"Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Relation (database); Citation database; Visibility; Citation analysis; Computer science; Database; Citation impact; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Scopus; Sociology; Geography; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.4570312116954996,"score_gpt":0.6150197274678524,"score_spread":0.1579885157723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775516587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931578,0.00065531774,0.00021134346,0.0005834924,0.00006495224,0.000009748305,0.0018835859,0.000022684106,0.0034110001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982218,0.00012210515,0.00014900789,0.000061416125,0.000047889716,0.0000070526266,0.0011021643,0.000006105007,0.00028255137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922726,0.0044037537,0.0006866388,0.0009808136,0.0010752465,0.0005809217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8907237,0.08838495,0.010680414,0.00246423,0.0043807067,0.0033660645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010293605,0.0004351253,0.0007127193,0.004102619,0.0005755539,0.0025466634,0.00061522407,0.0008705591,0.0036028156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047302995,0.00013896715,0.0021449816,0.008047278,0.0007365591,0.0016887537,0.0016464619,0.0012319273,0.00052554405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012217977,0.00025389178,0.9843428,0.000116437965,0.0027814072,0.0001255114,0.00016470996,0.0010360272,0.00039992662,0.00054320734,0.0010818687,0.007932304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066828805,0.0005213202,0.9937543,0.000022089816,0.0016313442,0.00007328267,0.00045075582,0.0014598703,0.00057732494,0.0002281774,0.0011975612,0.000017148659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018190905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016651815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99589735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066366664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013987934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054438412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775559600","doi":"","title":"Structure, Change over Time, and Outcomes of Research Collaboration Networks: The Case of GRAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grand Challenges; Data science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24187908306715933,"score_gpt":0.5126841484973699,"score_spread":0.27080506543021055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775559600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725696,0.00048219954,0.0024368672,0.0037694252,0.000041982752,0.000093277384,0.000065705935,0.000020428706,0.020520547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974251,0.00021929028,0.0010946398,0.000106102445,0.000014346647,0.00007196291,0.00004071504,0.000010108884,0.001017647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871832,0.008499518,0.00031302468,0.0012524696,0.0016001076,0.0011516853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545527,0.024735503,0.008551823,0.0031171557,0.003789311,0.0052536177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01837886,0.00039538572,0.00038111093,0.003885318,0.0122083975,0.008647039,0.0017231576,0.0016244821,0.0026060506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061598256,0.0004183145,0.00036137277,0.004140009,0.009632187,0.011049915,0.008958794,0.0017759223,0.0002426281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014550847,0.00020774205,0.14453726,0.0001641273,0.000052319745,0.0028089213,0.7502397,0.0005934841,0.00059513794,0.04413509,0.0017967712,0.05472411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002638314,0.00019637021,0.15029305,0.0002821062,0.000052103638,0.0017261037,0.77015954,0.002483491,0.0006328733,0.034525033,0.039532278,0.00009066512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0244344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039152283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00870421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055779545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09719783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776998048","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v4n5a3264","title":"Modelling A Cooperative Approach to Open Access Scholarly Publishing: A Demonstration in the Canadian Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Political science; Open access publishing; Humanities; Library science; Revenue; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.8375792362507936,"score_gpt":0.5907971859553747,"score_spread":0.2467820502954189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776998048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5541977,0.0025305669,0.06692105,0.021521816,0.00016484821,0.0006816068,0.0019888359,0.0003489542,0.35164458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95747787,0.0011750638,0.01933486,0.00019673916,0.000029265595,0.00012812564,0.00026839963,0.000031216354,0.02135845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751556,0.00071822887,0.000079454796,0.0002577352,0.000953799,0.00047526887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994975,0.001865342,0.00042684344,0.0003191364,0.0018352382,0.00057843333],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037843266,0.00052665226,0.0003741921,0.0021823884,0.004156694,0.006428215,0.0021857156,0.0016842867,0.0063488735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095953755,0.00027749894,0.0006697505,0.0038217648,0.0033362268,0.0023089447,0.002788262,0.0013539309,0.0004358958],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026493586,0.00022459225,0.04449498,0.0002884493,0.000099219054,0.0010440527,0.012878254,0.20141856,0.001452703,0.6657659,0.012925243,0.05914307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019340272,0.00025301374,0.03990564,0.0004336974,0.00022292216,0.00034622152,0.027036352,0.58235645,0.0015430709,0.14395618,0.2034867,0.00026629676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95769274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95660204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048517503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06713334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35202074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778419273","doi":"10.1111/ejn.13814","title":"Mapping international impact of Danish neuroscience from 2004 to 2015 using tailored scientometric methodology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"European Journal of Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H. Lundbeck A/S; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Novo Nordisk; Lundbeckfonden","keywords":"Danish; Neuroscience; Psychology","score_opus":0.7364387941043548,"score_gpt":0.6235921305892304,"score_spread":0.1128466635151244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778419273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75103366,0.040114865,0.008093387,0.004593665,0.0007444939,0.0004510036,0.07775603,0.00027691378,0.11693593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953006,0.00865972,0.0050131837,0.00023648272,0.00014880752,0.0002429597,0.02696011,0.000080711805,0.005651922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821323,0.0025284884,0.004689972,0.002311361,0.0068172575,0.0015206359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96577483,0.010623694,0.010951011,0.0021455027,0.008434447,0.002070466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015382254,0.00060601503,0.0011037403,0.044157416,0.0015501878,0.009503593,0.0012929536,0.00091870676,0.003059544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047195625,0.00042627694,0.001299615,0.05057505,0.0016943171,0.0041262307,0.0065207193,0.0008083243,0.0010362624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060956477,0.00019250535,0.6713241,0.010713622,0.0014191424,0.0012159857,0.022605024,0.009294793,0.0010675895,0.07406315,0.02678223,0.18071231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019425197,0.00017600165,0.78128356,0.0034043386,0.00054176245,0.00066435436,0.022871114,0.0027146882,0.0016508732,0.00508132,0.1814565,0.00013598266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043152984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04380825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98461777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007480004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012467276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08580363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781044009","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.005","title":"On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Citation; Citation analysis; Altmetrics; Discipline; Web of science; Set (abstract data type); Citation impact","score_opus":0.4491389199918624,"score_gpt":0.49777142617191705,"score_spread":0.04863250618005466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781044009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962829,0.00048936997,0.0010349712,0.00012066074,0.000007688135,0.000010233212,0.001101074,0.000048378282,0.0009047416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699855,0.0001961925,0.0011852375,0.000011565973,0.000031344494,0.000013399858,0.0012542367,0.000019336765,0.00029023728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753773,0.0008902885,0.0003266971,0.00047521712,0.00063762657,0.00013253013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89007217,0.09421062,0.008805728,0.0030692115,0.002638785,0.0012033725],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004119085,0.00039846238,0.00081626896,0.01418869,0.0009909152,0.0028854362,0.0007423745,0.00078468723,0.0024204983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044277783,0.00027094712,0.0012607474,0.016978297,0.00088069687,0.002933854,0.0015549805,0.00082618755,0.0007799296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001484918,0.00008320886,0.98009425,0.00008833065,0.0006319938,0.00012697664,0.00045449974,0.0010024578,0.001021229,0.0003519287,0.00029435492,0.0157023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123933105,0.000053936303,0.98858964,0.00001587351,0.00025621965,0.00024482995,0.00052247324,0.008622396,0.00052949,0.0006400804,0.000486543,0.000026214055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005694335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007813164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005857043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090730714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021784067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781928277","doi":"10.1177/0844562117748287","title":"Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Scholarship; Publish or perish; Public relations; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9005290747628881,"score_gpt":0.7058359562956766,"score_spread":0.1946931184672115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781928277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0085662855,0.023806905,0.08707895,0.74771655,0.013742882,0.000778261,0.00027933193,0.004062721,0.11396807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20905519,0.08626636,0.3817736,0.13357672,0.020709712,0.0025541729,0.0009980184,0.0067596156,0.15830672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8784928,0.049636528,0.0112463245,0.004488091,0.051114853,0.00502135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58374155,0.21835819,0.030278563,0.04619321,0.07728785,0.044140603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10072497,0.0011027881,0.0020061075,0.010534851,0.020721618,0.070333995,0.0068694074,0.014708305,0.027562557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38218293,0.0015289831,0.001485045,0.010787432,0.023495851,0.083294235,0.030384468,0.016469974,0.03288009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056228404,0.00014059748,0.0042140367,0.0013753093,0.00009058613,0.0008667744,0.020909237,0.00045088702,0.00062370626,0.09257649,0.42923206,0.44946408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026579697,0.00007192456,0.0011409655,0.0024199928,0.000034089455,0.0011140982,0.018343179,0.00052847166,0.00041056465,0.15311493,0.8226258,0.00016949997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006986493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113222115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99313056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00646601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045490086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53269094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782047141","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.145","title":"Special Section on the Future University Press in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Special section; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; History; Literature; Archaeology; Engineering; Engineering physics","score_opus":0.32807171846348404,"score_gpt":0.42329114030668996,"score_spread":0.09521942184320592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782047141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018482786,0.11726098,0.00037633302,0.18496254,0.17925915,0.00013081751,0.0075402074,0.00053231564,0.5080894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013300605,0.05667656,0.00036943267,0.019864386,0.032747485,0.00006367547,0.0024490037,0.0003783326,0.87415045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960115,0.00017774846,0.00016046924,0.00034959769,0.0025233077,0.0007773143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867757,0.0013585377,0.0004637697,0.0005101484,0.0068109883,0.0040807766],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021923,0.0010590521,0.0013661406,0.009392386,0.009378373,0.013058906,0.0017579818,0.004569967,0.19394535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007798108,0.00064041157,0.000647294,0.012923872,0.0035027862,0.0052204374,0.0030249876,0.003713754,0.038967982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056951717,0.000004635957,0.0001196246,0.000059467202,0.0000020932616,0.000065785156,0.00009232032,0.00001840036,0.000043444365,0.0043245805,0.98881334,0.006450544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010159603,0.0000011943685,0.00062573334,0.00011347549,0.0000017989644,0.000027192906,0.00012496884,0.000010076423,0.000018089382,0.0002848984,0.9987865,0.0000049693454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7324903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90850663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044173498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08403055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6488118},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2782500721","doi":"10.11575/prism/20","title":"Avoiding Predatory Journals and Questionable Conferences: A Resource Guide","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Political science; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.30987310440579063,"score_gpt":0.4451281990108951,"score_spread":0.1352550946051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782500721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010998412,0.0476449,0.12526266,0.10879437,0.013410671,0.047680385,0.11904253,0.023277743,0.50388825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0119,0.06408583,0.5698261,0.034422375,0.0037376091,0.032226384,0.052195165,0.0053488556,0.22625762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885787,0.003832187,0.0028348938,0.00057636615,0.0034474651,0.00045125544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9159094,0.046887036,0.009946327,0.0030645083,0.02044899,0.0037437403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01082608,0.001776088,0.0017366789,0.017878948,0.0031528834,0.007800887,0.0037195804,0.003345216,0.09123198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060772043,0.0014415983,0.0014082346,0.01619424,0.0016163737,0.0107315015,0.005653793,0.0026817839,0.05528497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005551756,0.00009606967,0.00050940976,0.0069015254,0.000014669587,0.0003391118,0.0017041964,0.0002818326,0.0005786633,0.005558893,0.821842,0.16211802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024521723,0.00003674486,0.00075600937,0.0035540173,0.000008943812,0.0003690509,0.00097391306,0.000079618534,0.00017100052,0.0026699055,0.99132454,0.00003178632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071344613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024558509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028452156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014647466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30520135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784275186","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4","title":"Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Frontier; Work (physics); Position (finance); China; Political science; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Data science; Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.6933349039972806,"score_gpt":0.6011293296615132,"score_spread":0.09220557433576737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784275186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9105783,0.0016347907,0.0037123535,0.0014324907,0.000096372605,0.000018345998,0.0040856106,0.000060875936,0.0783808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630797,0.00024922605,0.0004796617,0.00003327476,0.000040650597,0.000005508289,0.00073452445,0.000010305602,0.0021389585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994917,0.00011676383,0.000032053144,0.00009956499,0.00012859833,0.00013129301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445575,0.002748924,0.0011012938,0.00018723842,0.0008005675,0.00070622284],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007656526,0.0002657905,0.00026844675,0.004134388,0.0005596493,0.0033583064,0.00023730243,0.00062943186,0.014394048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010924939,0.00007785306,0.00027368357,0.007166808,0.0005782601,0.003095246,0.00086157647,0.00067715714,0.0008787806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039261786,0.00013861932,0.7413422,0.00030069027,0.00036296985,0.0004296791,0.0026517822,0.006704005,0.0011528148,0.1329226,0.014744487,0.098857604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032170854,0.00015511322,0.86466765,0.00021066346,0.00023563956,0.00028459195,0.008412499,0.008169271,0.001246097,0.0923465,0.024186747,0.000053032683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055061816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064453078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067135296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066092855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048152864},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2786208824","doi":"10.7577/seminar.2417","title":"Editorial Seminar.net Issue 3 Vol. 6","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar net","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Enthusiasm; Value (mathematics); Media studies; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2142401471411202,"score_gpt":0.5231949041981997,"score_spread":0.30895475705707953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786208824","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021393746,0.0036091057,0.00028001604,0.01713034,0.8671318,0.00015668757,0.00048317877,0.00072372594,0.110271186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020067063,0.0044172322,0.00034955418,0.01750031,0.4621317,0.00014322346,0.0007823261,0.00061606435,0.5120529],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800545,0.00021090869,0.00012594787,0.00031090097,0.0011399209,0.00020692247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938871,0.0007344965,0.00026841398,0.00036805114,0.0029424161,0.0017995242],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028212296,0.0028877065,0.0014311587,0.0027305228,0.0025102238,0.009022688,0.0026348436,0.0050309575,0.48513708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008160346,0.0007097661,0.0014879728,0.0011780452,0.0011160579,0.0032129376,0.0025224905,0.0054785004,0.38252395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019656143,0.000018223083,0.000032429634,0.00010137215,0.0000019122601,0.000041342006,0.0000073860415,0.000012389633,0.000081689825,0.0003043301,0.988399,0.0109801935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012738609,0.000019559533,0.00013233816,0.00016870983,0.000002697884,0.00006714098,0.00002194721,0.000044666027,0.00008763375,0.00044434433,0.9989925,0.0000057840043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091897085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016063964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99726945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018771607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024976411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7343894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787759455","doi":"10.3844/jssp.2018.55.64","title":"Research Impact, the ‘New Academic Capital’: An Environmental Scan of Research Impact Indicators and Resources for the Humanities and Social Sciences across 32 Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Social impact; Political science; Disadvantage; Economic impact analysis; Work (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.661923208667436,"score_gpt":0.6681282858787989,"score_spread":0.006205077211362875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787759455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5903585,0.0668577,0.013371145,0.03930815,0.00040545437,0.00055921386,0.080838725,0.00052817614,0.20777297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92187345,0.023421546,0.020572796,0.0025895392,0.00022229152,0.00066708034,0.026289154,0.00048591004,0.003878225],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95225483,0.01697753,0.0074569,0.0033665434,0.016757429,0.0031867987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8225638,0.097598776,0.027830884,0.015117982,0.033454753,0.0034337167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03229792,0.0005989647,0.0011948278,0.05622711,0.0032758727,0.012237102,0.0013928715,0.0010435072,0.004167392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09977629,0.0007430493,0.00086173817,0.17528223,0.0053125354,0.012051923,0.010403125,0.0017017202,0.0006419889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006194181,0.00013609276,0.28664517,0.0091115385,0.00076641154,0.0007977498,0.036435746,0.0035736936,0.0017925552,0.16699828,0.0510343,0.44208905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004192868,0.0001278503,0.48307005,0.0069893496,0.00038571088,0.0006706209,0.048870426,0.001003823,0.002549057,0.02288777,0.43317956,0.00022386637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028236454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028915988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007977429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013216944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1708098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788604854","doi":"10.7717/peerj.4269","title":"Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Stratification (seeds); Open access publishing; Prestige; Inequality; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9274457685568921,"score_gpt":0.7581399849400745,"score_spread":0.16930578361681758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788604854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361263,0.004530205,0.0034323267,0.0050943447,0.0000677809,0.00013507213,0.0009305049,0.00003087882,0.049652774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794763,0.00052299007,0.0006146297,0.00008488959,0.000050845876,0.000023693567,0.00016732585,0.0000071922136,0.0005808828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97701615,0.010509027,0.0021640065,0.0016561913,0.0062070144,0.0024475625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8814836,0.058632113,0.038786843,0.006786548,0.0077411444,0.0065697418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015309624,0.00023827188,0.00069974014,0.012379954,0.004069929,0.0092340065,0.00089927507,0.0008080809,0.005930471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074257195,0.00023498252,0.0005070427,0.02698713,0.0050787,0.006959481,0.005380246,0.0010099155,0.00060149445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002683547,0.000215685,0.7882907,0.0004416205,0.00020815605,0.0009357509,0.032283142,0.00073941506,0.00039816773,0.11052822,0.002257025,0.06343372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006236933,0.0001373782,0.83752966,0.0006540436,0.00013558206,0.0009806949,0.042866994,0.002016424,0.00062388805,0.09152528,0.023370882,0.00009691045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012395927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99910074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004006235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037109742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080965936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789541004","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23165","title":"Chemical engineering research synergies across scientific categories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Curriculum; Chemical reaction engineering; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Chemistry; Library science; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.3623810731150262,"score_gpt":0.4945005040236328,"score_spread":0.13211943090860662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789541004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5460702,0.14161268,0.0043840385,0.016180558,0.0016859305,0.00038528722,0.016101927,0.00085000746,0.27272934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94650364,0.033214897,0.0026718052,0.0010643717,0.0013727571,0.00016623379,0.0074687307,0.00009085774,0.007446712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98893344,0.0019313298,0.001044966,0.0012275116,0.005418481,0.001444317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489253,0.023917196,0.0069898395,0.0023850799,0.013886605,0.0038959356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059601,0.00072080095,0.0011063146,0.08551158,0.0017374619,0.010258463,0.0008468409,0.0011720625,0.017166955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031964883,0.0003045581,0.0011420279,0.09682449,0.0010362753,0.0063154115,0.006220334,0.0007528121,0.005071149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094656035,0.00046123445,0.29086292,0.010021273,0.0025119283,0.0011679991,0.005092424,0.002216008,0.009647152,0.061895426,0.044181634,0.5709955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511124,0.00030884513,0.69972736,0.003881935,0.001623778,0.0018012279,0.014931956,0.0024813802,0.004341396,0.062123522,0.208503,0.00012454408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021959457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023008753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002974511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042075827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057429135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790065445","doi":"10.1177/0539018418763131","title":"«  <i>Une bombe dans la discipline </i> » : l’émergence du mouvement génopolitique en science politique","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18553571869742366,"score_gpt":0.5464111860628246,"score_spread":0.3608754673654009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790065445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74683416,0.012399067,0.043204308,0.089186616,0.0009606413,0.00022880796,0.0002715079,0.00017726813,0.10673767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976594,0.0013545206,0.004828729,0.0010977453,0.00018853934,0.00011386812,0.00006137314,0.000054846154,0.0025343548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9435195,0.04064406,0.002006393,0.003463709,0.00788069,0.0024857677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89040464,0.085376866,0.009895186,0.0061767283,0.0047200895,0.003426385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06239438,0.00032132992,0.00091411575,0.009616243,0.011060513,0.021314794,0.001157359,0.0035612383,0.0018795112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06587694,0.00075547653,0.0006003953,0.01770096,0.04722392,0.014258853,0.009370689,0.0060803224,0.0003335531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009235671,0.0000340399,0.015762607,0.00032290706,0.000031383828,0.00046506754,0.5080064,0.00023662423,0.001830971,0.42164397,0.0030586442,0.048515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042993783,0.00009161262,0.040351156,0.0009136976,0.000027224536,0.0010029767,0.34377462,0.0010225977,0.001893992,0.1410803,0.46961933,0.00017952351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013322077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011317355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98893946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014968796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32997698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078137","doi":"10.1177/2292550317749508","title":"An Evaluation of h-Index as a Measure of Research Productivity Among Canadian Academic Plastic Surgeons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Scopus; Index (typography); Univariate; Test (biology); Productivity; Medicine; Multivariate statistics; Metric (unit); Psychology; Statistics; Mann–Whitney U test; Medical education; Mathematics; Operations management; MEDLINE; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.7151227388252344,"score_gpt":0.5891069335293433,"score_spread":0.12601580529589107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790078137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526405,0.0046280907,0.004177074,0.0026975467,0.00016312534,0.0006277869,0.010856847,0.00015702324,0.02405208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289364,0.0007181893,0.0037370895,0.00011190229,0.000058547037,0.00016851218,0.0018577859,0.000012331983,0.00044190776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816465,0.0026344468,0.002286554,0.0007820267,0.01134539,0.0013051087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9035321,0.024992159,0.023221577,0.0023479066,0.037237458,0.008668829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02245409,0.00042323166,0.0008316705,0.01256525,0.0019678888,0.002745484,0.002071844,0.0004408388,0.0022349493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05893453,0.00020597874,0.0012817547,0.016507177,0.0014554607,0.0012446133,0.0019582273,0.00066575623,0.0002508264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012985738,0.000059403454,0.9757598,0.0003615717,0.00027043885,0.000045246445,0.00060703617,0.00034624277,0.00014377714,0.00039087597,0.0023097207,0.019575983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017457782,0.00011325386,0.99527127,0.00010816679,0.000111329085,0.00007073896,0.0011789378,0.0010391867,0.0001972756,0.00024821353,0.0016144094,0.00002972902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.446512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45465073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98743474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018625261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.887826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790320647","doi":"10.1177/0539018417752089","title":"Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Impact Fund; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Reward system; Sociology; Symbolic capital; Foundation (evidence); Social media; Social capital; Visibility; Perception; Science communication; Public relations; Dissemination; Data science; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.33461530882784657,"score_gpt":0.5405144087401722,"score_spread":0.20589909991232563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790320647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8024216,0.0103486935,0.02542081,0.03021929,0.00050674664,0.00011480945,0.000389089,0.00013490986,0.13044398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400216,0.0013133277,0.0026618433,0.0001662541,0.0002139357,0.000026846155,0.000046786692,0.000010797483,0.0015580468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777624,0.011655515,0.0015300997,0.00095732056,0.007194751,0.0008998857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8600796,0.09536562,0.026108775,0.0052198903,0.008821617,0.0044044503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014889092,0.0003164004,0.0005033341,0.009190785,0.0031009216,0.016837113,0.0009313249,0.00123414,0.003469787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095754094,0.00027278275,0.0003592695,0.01402853,0.007925908,0.014280376,0.0075309365,0.0015331256,0.0004042687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029634507,0.0002769023,0.20873296,0.0010256541,0.00021643983,0.00046594194,0.04734182,0.0017058523,0.0020728577,0.328959,0.0040306137,0.40487558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007668974,0.00036107522,0.2906633,0.0020240708,0.00035736308,0.0011428831,0.059806135,0.00947713,0.0045689065,0.5300996,0.10105629,0.00036653999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002045801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003298819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048594275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046701073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790387137","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.1006","title":"Publication trends in spine research from 2007 to 2016: Comparison of the Orthopaedic Research Society Spine Section and the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOR Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; National Institutes of Health; Orthopaedic Research Society","keywords":"SPINE (molecular biology); Lumbar spine; Medicine; Workforce; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Surgery; Computer science; Law; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.5948204341850184,"score_gpt":0.621151133199973,"score_spread":0.02633069901495455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790387137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67386997,0.22351676,0.0014366043,0.015121214,0.0024155036,0.00017144738,0.064008825,0.000386965,0.019072765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83965814,0.09870839,0.003557727,0.0026344373,0.0028011538,0.0002907785,0.045850527,0.0002054671,0.0062933555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874139,0.0014438519,0.004427069,0.0018759661,0.004076206,0.00076297927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88318884,0.022323476,0.05246025,0.0022339092,0.0327906,0.0070029814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008492258,0.00045250973,0.0008372483,0.02463542,0.0006104803,0.0034189376,0.0010998023,0.0008384363,0.0028995145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039859775,0.00028110846,0.0011826014,0.037598062,0.00074659294,0.004029155,0.0017781741,0.0009182321,0.0016592155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050198904,0.00006504971,0.887695,0.0046933847,0.0006002416,0.0003255755,0.0024405802,0.00016080686,0.0009847496,0.0013938855,0.017829029,0.08330968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026596248,0.00018371918,0.94425994,0.0017171936,0.00033313213,0.0013779885,0.0034167136,0.00024262269,0.0005900132,0.0003388124,0.047470067,0.000043281936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057716593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010169807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99150777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019338451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039970684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04491192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790464658","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2216","title":"Effective Practices and Strategies for Open Access Outreach: A Qualitative Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Outreach; Jargon; Public relations; Influencer marketing; Qualitative research; Relevance (law); Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.854673664994753,"score_gpt":0.7095175612684768,"score_spread":0.1451561037262762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790464658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96843565,0.00085905846,0.008688151,0.0063658385,0.000107254935,0.0021901561,0.00018344371,0.000053458374,0.013116978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856311,0.0011524726,0.005715075,0.0014114863,0.000026040614,0.001902485,0.000058916146,0.000034868433,0.0040674577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664993,0.027082304,0.0009492458,0.0010515886,0.0018213488,0.00259626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94043124,0.0479695,0.0028696056,0.0013469544,0.0036502746,0.003732482],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037626605,0.00059669436,0.00090632174,0.0026172954,0.014555742,0.007094564,0.0028074286,0.0027771364,0.0039025333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041860815,0.00085543306,0.00050732284,0.0031472852,0.013544331,0.0068692444,0.00874371,0.0028279675,0.0005428761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015119735,0.00008623617,0.0012509475,0.00018109896,0.0000016531791,0.00037425096,0.99111956,0.000032739237,0.000283336,0.0016946758,0.0002953416,0.0046650902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006107678,0.000048380785,0.00043043346,0.00021553501,0.000002158847,0.00009062302,0.99245113,0.000067162,0.00014733126,0.00043635102,0.006097691,0.000007192678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008695196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011227175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99719256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009760173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013316011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19899088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790580186","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2018.1455659","title":"Evolving models of collaborative drug discovery: managing intellectual capital assets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Drug discovery; Business; Intellectual capital; Drug; Knowledge management; Data science; Computer science; Finance; Pharmacology; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.17801551159691334,"score_gpt":0.4871169826697052,"score_spread":0.30910147107279184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790580186","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051561446,0.02200888,0.0036772878,0.3099792,0.6583898,0.000040806408,0.00026886634,0.00012112734,0.004998317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010549559,0.019240724,0.0018189106,0.019529352,0.9409494,0.00005017333,0.00007635773,0.000047893078,0.0077377306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146605,0.0026338485,0.0007606354,0.00074992486,0.004055053,0.00033438572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392669,0.04645125,0.0024017987,0.0011832976,0.0086640455,0.0020326353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01475864,0.0023686276,0.001999373,0.0036461721,0.0022826227,0.010612257,0.006579217,0.01974044,0.0073813703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044916667,0.0007954191,0.0014893472,0.0027062113,0.005407272,0.011374565,0.0023305148,0.019073047,0.002257497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006038668,0.000030960615,0.00013174338,0.00075670605,0.00006920304,0.00027049368,0.000088560504,0.00059671514,0.000086119646,0.021717047,0.95503944,0.02115261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016891792,0.00004822307,0.00052509876,0.0016521026,0.00027192084,0.00041256959,0.0002149709,0.0068081324,0.00039035722,0.105105795,0.88431627,0.00008564467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025562076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067398967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98524135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006885926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004958242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0780521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790914095","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000002585","title":"Authorship Trends in Spine Publications From 2000 to 2015","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Demography; Medicine; History; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8175322235307786,"score_gpt":0.6776906944510808,"score_spread":0.13984152907969782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790914095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4037452,0.5374416,0.0012995868,0.0025840232,0.0006606349,0.0011467118,0.046928436,0.00010668585,0.006087136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7831801,0.18389376,0.004283444,0.0021697243,0.0008126331,0.0029429896,0.02070174,0.000071732844,0.0019439113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853284,0.0021103942,0.0072990092,0.0018686648,0.002879886,0.0005136809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8933957,0.03068366,0.052496243,0.0016297849,0.020189533,0.0016050447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105794845,0.0004992278,0.0011958316,0.040020842,0.00058434653,0.0023022997,0.0009282411,0.00081420835,0.003726942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05141319,0.00049247494,0.002136092,0.034909163,0.00068067334,0.0045957523,0.0013524025,0.0005494939,0.0010212794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011523453,0.0001258034,0.7762367,0.080156706,0.002474627,0.0006325295,0.0029699006,0.0002430302,0.00074532034,0.0008627541,0.010927514,0.12347277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013116116,0.0005232466,0.89970815,0.05379725,0.0024054633,0.0031762626,0.0053062956,0.00026133837,0.0006927866,0.00046741028,0.03345955,0.00007107617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028323627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006266846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98942053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023060204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041526356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055950344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791388250","doi":"10.7202/1058277ar","title":"La gestion des conflits d'intérêt dans un jury de thèse de doctorat","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5908077542865994,"score_gpt":0.5419813837979655,"score_spread":0.04882637048863392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791388250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74966097,0.007924705,0.013546115,0.122346304,0.0016275023,0.00041642165,0.00060702296,0.00012047785,0.103750445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98921704,0.0009548695,0.0036156022,0.0016993858,0.0004395574,0.00022301829,0.00009466054,0.000021875156,0.0037340755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8562557,0.09049849,0.010375158,0.0062960573,0.028769566,0.0078050448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5491314,0.35670668,0.05212776,0.0052418564,0.023502985,0.01328929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10935905,0.0003934608,0.0010678779,0.0065154242,0.01440537,0.01855587,0.0024857752,0.005885001,0.008835371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3707924,0.0005931985,0.00076830655,0.004552962,0.008593562,0.007869679,0.009355695,0.0069265636,0.00095936516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011780389,0.00042061514,0.26140028,0.0010795731,0.00036404157,0.006197959,0.20342529,0.0017940102,0.0013018355,0.2730612,0.056224313,0.19355284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002565699,0.00051392143,0.24241725,0.0033595515,0.00033790158,0.005553007,0.3918354,0.0071393745,0.0026797636,0.13505262,0.21024336,0.00061133486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014720028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017980339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012391993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017995901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5783528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791541340","doi":"10.1111/acfi.12350","title":"Drivers of research impact: evidence from the top three finance journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Finance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Presentation (obstetrics); Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6950390697914387,"score_gpt":0.6262159828208154,"score_spread":0.06882308697062334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791541340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688839,0.014852285,0.0005191036,0.0032684675,0.00017550845,0.000040332576,0.0025632472,0.00004575984,0.0096514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948613,0.0032965578,0.00017040003,0.000084055166,0.00022895742,0.000014637163,0.00077910913,0.000014552954,0.00055041723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899428,0.001903359,0.0016839482,0.0010528336,0.0045987857,0.0008183431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6738387,0.1568966,0.10728802,0.007756123,0.03816274,0.016057853],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012019558,0.00038897002,0.0010664943,0.024428362,0.0010822058,0.009490898,0.0009331066,0.0011813134,0.005865027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108598046,0.00026977426,0.00089504913,0.050439585,0.0010396244,0.005492662,0.0024035207,0.0009803271,0.0012524393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627129,0.00012751449,0.96647793,0.00072808476,0.00043840383,0.00025546312,0.0016051698,0.00033645035,0.00031618762,0.0013481932,0.0015005104,0.026703384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016777423,0.00007848942,0.99107975,0.00018449861,0.00016399931,0.00018253828,0.002667013,0.00030607503,0.00033019294,0.0010733594,0.0038928872,0.000024335719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032751581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026785973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013447073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022670147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06356627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791800404","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-02965-4","title":"Make supplementary reference lists visible for citation metrics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Computational biology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.5156067527836983,"score_gpt":0.6019829892015935,"score_spread":0.08637623641789527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791800404","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012470566,0.0029415453,0.0037904081,0.005343054,0.009757424,0.0002787175,0.86262596,0.008042103,0.10597375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007147371,0.005663399,0.017687729,0.001235058,0.005374142,0.00085401937,0.7729228,0.0070654834,0.18204994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949167,0.0003281007,0.0010564266,0.00045703936,0.0028293936,0.00041244118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92020106,0.012371349,0.006930306,0.007456429,0.047098972,0.0059419153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003434758,0.0035343326,0.0037954738,0.078525044,0.002170782,0.008536187,0.004155275,0.0027405533,0.8402197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073027365,0.0016153705,0.0016639909,0.10381273,0.000563743,0.00633924,0.004444922,0.002207441,0.5930315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070485,0.00005358934,0.0005462278,0.0016446254,0.000054110697,0.000026890988,0.00001705093,0.00008532493,0.00039814593,0.0014441662,0.9517116,0.043987516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006172975,0.000028339022,0.0046247607,0.0008215107,0.0001110465,0.00013114807,0.000050948398,0.00037502492,0.0012703605,0.0076719737,0.98478264,0.000070521455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008485813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019833285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033530802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00855649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22790724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794611221","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.4987","title":"Publish and/or perish: A urological perspective on predatory publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Listing (finance); Publish or perish; Index (typography); Library science; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3476648110768687,"score_gpt":0.4850894105437658,"score_spread":0.1374245994668971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794611221","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01100084,0.7360025,0.0019526724,0.2265113,0.007210957,0.000028070468,0.000112042275,0.000054377324,0.017127201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20584522,0.6429357,0.0033347982,0.11462301,0.02800362,0.00008402023,0.00013034372,0.00011136307,0.004931975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781275,0.010653356,0.0018765739,0.0017300905,0.0065470417,0.001065454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81727695,0.12940963,0.027302984,0.0037111957,0.016708516,0.005590757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021679612,0.0004112163,0.0009990685,0.008569229,0.0032815386,0.011727036,0.0018652581,0.0047902,0.004292761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07304959,0.00038234456,0.0007300906,0.011635166,0.018460458,0.019134955,0.004369479,0.0049715587,0.0008980788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030277492,0.000103440936,0.026172966,0.01877722,0.00042329277,0.0027307912,0.042071305,0.00047970682,0.00064652157,0.377456,0.2064307,0.32440534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032100408,0.00017962782,0.015545316,0.021967372,0.00015255126,0.0047909156,0.022682866,0.00022798458,0.0003406196,0.07286822,0.86111706,0.00009546651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034031186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047052163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003635403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076196236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114654124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794719542","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4339","title":"Professionnalisation de la science","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University; Princeton University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Wayne State University; State University of New York; Stanford Bio-X; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2324248750248497,"score_gpt":0.42438766976298187,"score_spread":0.19196279473813216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794719542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025439719,0.0071556927,0.009319939,0.010717265,0.0016619215,0.000033229473,0.00005529403,0.00009672564,0.968416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27581725,0.01848544,0.017807707,0.00700736,0.004661042,0.00027221447,0.00027460835,0.00024312786,0.6754313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273247,0.0028557973,0.0002635884,0.0011209261,0.002306465,0.00072083325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961557,0.0012194477,0.0002962258,0.00058187114,0.0013300022,0.0004167088],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777616,0.000546396,0.00037712598,0.0028448529,0.0051800003,0.008526438,0.0010372961,0.0027193232,0.018590521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006900054,0.00030621825,0.0006592086,0.0027261556,0.021482004,0.006456579,0.003759035,0.005117374,0.0073825195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039268634,0.0000063271373,0.00005447744,0.000035665566,0.0000012564362,0.000014262859,0.0020448838,0.000052832078,0.00007126806,0.97975016,0.0066661923,0.011298868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004324405,0.000014700459,0.0002299552,0.00014248319,0.0000022815216,0.00008139898,0.0006016065,0.0001601036,0.00014970335,0.19093525,0.80766934,0.000008989615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018777203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014160411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99715513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012781719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016486797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09273833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795529249","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2732-8","title":"Can Twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Visibility; Social media; Citation; China; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5383689152925458,"score_gpt":0.5912490065647195,"score_spread":0.052880091272173635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795529249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87274486,0.0057499264,0.0013130588,0.02612841,0.0008829494,0.000057883946,0.0022456846,0.00021875133,0.09065838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949934,0.001098383,0.00015354571,0.00038525293,0.00052875926,0.000013085793,0.0002049975,0.000016177826,0.0026063789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975484,0.0007423538,0.00014901179,0.00030020592,0.0007465055,0.00051345467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716395,0.013780363,0.006157314,0.0015420915,0.004176702,0.0027040879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034385026,0.00033031488,0.00046135025,0.0050570876,0.0019715184,0.0060069086,0.0007313535,0.0013028589,0.013454439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027975326,0.00021493426,0.00051859923,0.00747478,0.0014891905,0.008483963,0.0025779083,0.0010489363,0.0011999427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087422185,0.00030417505,0.71404916,0.0010377187,0.00037993863,0.0011953323,0.018152352,0.0009025139,0.0028245104,0.035318363,0.03312455,0.19183716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015348147,0.00044969248,0.83813566,0.00057845085,0.0007258838,0.0004899522,0.02575452,0.008972548,0.004666322,0.025410658,0.09451679,0.00014599439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016066115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014163169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022526851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002883464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045009553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796260596","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2018.01.1236","title":"Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacy Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; University of California, Davis; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Universidade de Coimbra; Kerman University of Medical Sciences; Universiti Sains Malaysia; University of Warwick; Purdue University; North Carolina State University; Jordan University of Science and Technology; NorthShore University HealthSystem; University of Minnesota; Chapman University; University of Pittsburgh; Universitetet i Tromsø; University of Technology Sydney; North Dakota State University; RMIT University; Kaiser Permanente","keywords":"Publishing; Economic shortage; Peer review; Open peer review; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Plant biology","score_opus":0.8200264845075884,"score_gpt":0.683649664139037,"score_spread":0.13637682036855137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796260596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004274091,0.033712532,0.04627298,0.5094778,0.16926078,0.0010822106,0.00072887255,0.004715243,0.2304755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117499776,0.05429522,0.06892323,0.17793012,0.15801862,0.002185331,0.0019274096,0.009027334,0.41019297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6844755,0.075429425,0.030709837,0.030105261,0.16946536,0.009814654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18072796,0.18339503,0.04735976,0.11624391,0.39614198,0.07613143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12182007,0.0021562355,0.0049332124,0.006555108,0.010520952,0.041762374,0.006919165,0.015887303,0.059006743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54805243,0.0029885648,0.001986507,0.007969671,0.017530873,0.039227016,0.020155953,0.023145234,0.15172511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014935208,0.0001238509,0.0019680364,0.0012357672,0.00014777252,0.00030513245,0.0017546666,0.00021972018,0.0011381614,0.05805686,0.79359436,0.14130624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059935108,0.00004930362,0.0011892109,0.0008914949,0.000042761523,0.0005102054,0.00046549545,0.00031480571,0.00063439854,0.024384474,0.97133,0.00012796489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043519954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005398857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00640141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06952626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64425385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796774656","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2018.1445063","title":"Information Seeking Behaviors, Attitudes, and Choices of Academic Chemists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Brock University","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","keywords":"Credibility; Information seeking; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Work (physics); Graduate students; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.19762230372971246,"score_gpt":0.49826799255530685,"score_spread":0.3006456888255944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796774656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99727005,0.00016092241,0.000039518673,0.0005056596,0.000004031304,0.000011728335,0.00003867696,0.0000032499097,0.0019660785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976539,0.00034233977,0.00012098707,0.0005394965,0.00001145069,0.000016431964,0.000066737965,0.0000027211447,0.0012459949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766624,0.00079726975,0.00017845533,0.00016720801,0.0007109448,0.00047994955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841723,0.0065146936,0.0036202718,0.0003453323,0.001740491,0.003607009],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005080813,0.00013258474,0.00030528722,0.0022604782,0.0023171206,0.0028982675,0.00044888543,0.0010022508,0.0026341432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016365293,0.00025791442,0.00031790498,0.0018515685,0.0011642256,0.0010925116,0.001297227,0.00093559397,0.0004474922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031129632,0.0005352601,0.85494244,0.00009916983,0.000055000066,0.00027624812,0.115111575,0.00008895607,0.00094444776,0.00043420403,0.0018766198,0.025324788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034639717,0.00035632745,0.77921546,0.00011673369,0.0000463421,0.0002687994,0.21223569,0.00045246942,0.0004664114,0.0003189589,0.0064327097,0.000055497723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04686016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06275763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019826216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030794204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093174815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800148785","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2187","title":"Dissertation-to-Book Publication Patterns Among a Sample of R1 Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oklahoma; University of Kansas; University of Minnesota; University of Notre Dame; University of Washington; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Subject (documents); Library science; Openness to experience; The arts; Sample (material); Subject matter; Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Curriculum","score_opus":0.5213068775118257,"score_gpt":0.5402604555768521,"score_spread":0.0189535780650264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800148785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899905,0.0017676438,0.00026372084,0.00060253544,0.000015479984,0.00006384766,0.0027186854,0.00006193741,0.004515815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929993,0.0015737006,0.0007472693,0.00014738338,0.00004222545,0.00009349881,0.0019209088,0.00005100818,0.0024246601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478674,0.0010626307,0.0009150984,0.0009726561,0.0018072345,0.0004555907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94231397,0.013642911,0.027941206,0.0028168913,0.009589988,0.0036951758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005609318,0.0002377214,0.00044569123,0.011174184,0.0011903917,0.0034099177,0.0013447598,0.0004444386,0.0076844073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03168133,0.00027359748,0.00033157817,0.014985869,0.00068352616,0.0024331582,0.0020440686,0.0004541029,0.0023422819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119133416,0.00008004222,0.94458985,0.00026722756,0.000052332816,0.00021638995,0.008982176,0.00012265178,0.0010811638,0.00077597337,0.0038011826,0.039911877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003936848,0.00005585135,0.9856269,0.00010999529,0.000013125368,0.0003498178,0.007838066,0.00015139175,0.0003964278,0.000121510086,0.005315835,0.000017224957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065342053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99439067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016195147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014269189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029665291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800174757","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.170901","title":"Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; McGill University Health Centre; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidence interval; Productivity; Medicine; Peer review; Principal (computer security); Psychology; Family medicine; Demography; Computer science; Political science; Internal medicine; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6250098631629204,"score_gpt":0.6052866715713491,"score_spread":0.01972319159157132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800174757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73972076,0.05530048,0.03455853,0.055272955,0.0032797288,0.015620476,0.0074391514,0.0005491355,0.08825872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974906,0.0033404652,0.013643371,0.0020881174,0.00028790045,0.0019899774,0.0006797627,0.00007732451,0.0029870735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.48422715,0.1901312,0.07120944,0.018016497,0.22367069,0.0127450125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20659953,0.2632891,0.15603873,0.026692308,0.3305618,0.016818466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3853834,0.0007866556,0.0022976834,0.014860206,0.007703655,0.008521469,0.0060145073,0.0018058788,0.0024862234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63970774,0.0010690973,0.001860133,0.020847687,0.0065189465,0.00219647,0.008079884,0.0020326471,0.0003064116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009861424,0.00009034197,0.8009591,0.005175228,0.0020408488,0.00047812192,0.018400336,0.0013708178,0.0005444861,0.008476632,0.01635936,0.14511864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029212327,0.00030326314,0.9278027,0.0041147494,0.00096615736,0.0005742123,0.0065439874,0.0069759777,0.0011547762,0.0050077788,0.04595943,0.00030491588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8103337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83317554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9140663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085933656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25463304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800643910","doi":"10.24069/2542-0267-2017-2-4-89-106","title":"Article processing charges for open access publication — the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor and Publisher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publication; Payment; Publishing; Library science; Business; Scholarly communication; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Advertising; Finance","score_opus":0.6636388431243844,"score_gpt":0.6271668038582291,"score_spread":0.036472039266155276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800643910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44024774,0.07059099,0.004357236,0.280018,0.0028347238,0.0006515883,0.027387228,0.0010713211,0.1728412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89887077,0.03983102,0.006524684,0.020783758,0.00095376524,0.00019459575,0.0069495915,0.0002753449,0.025616467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668063,0.0020023778,0.002263931,0.0023533315,0.021657651,0.0049164784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7958746,0.027216004,0.02885148,0.004839218,0.10084273,0.04237593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011804518,0.00051975995,0.00080547243,0.0108417375,0.008405502,0.015316297,0.0041534128,0.0021042188,0.0121190045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051796854,0.00067616143,0.0011488184,0.030712688,0.004274144,0.0054442897,0.004105357,0.002668232,0.0012941819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083177385,0.00018170418,0.31391874,0.0026502768,0.00038451183,0.0027029766,0.0070616845,0.0011032773,0.0022646978,0.057671502,0.22870027,0.38252863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008873051,0.00011422249,0.54242,0.0020168754,0.00021016205,0.0021374654,0.01850004,0.002545465,0.0011973674,0.0076823044,0.42262185,0.0004654372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97109115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99584657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11195382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21173173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8122856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801626634","doi":"10.29007/sxfq","title":"Women in the Shadow of Big Men: The Case of Canada Excellence Research Chairs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"EasyChair preprint","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Government (linguistics); Citation; Political science; Shadow (psychology); Library science; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Citation impact; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.5901366365887122,"score_gpt":0.5595273375253721,"score_spread":0.03060929906334009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801626634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5814155,0.008789988,0.0013808509,0.17518952,0.0009951009,0.00017409015,0.00041764908,0.00004568145,0.23159161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748325,0.0022809263,0.0003385824,0.007645777,0.00018100995,0.000033285633,0.00006194355,0.00003930746,0.014586564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97976065,0.005096002,0.0003453857,0.0015063753,0.005349614,0.007941996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630045,0.010297032,0.0036723183,0.0014026142,0.005526558,0.016096987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012938273,0.00048944243,0.0010118209,0.0043403474,0.04464684,0.015589866,0.002077916,0.0035723147,0.008714675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027872445,0.00048391707,0.00057736045,0.008308306,0.018107235,0.0049856487,0.008967443,0.0042111548,0.0007159618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003134158,0.00009105998,0.104557805,0.00027764597,0.000091038004,0.007945779,0.5652636,0.00024225423,0.000666008,0.21023202,0.048451856,0.06186757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007949634,0.000051357154,0.06521683,0.0008465958,0.00010512478,0.0013336628,0.65755254,0.00046287294,0.0004222327,0.022032239,0.25176692,0.0001301729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.884951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99565965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059546135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10459827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4320395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801852815","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scy033","title":"Introduction to a special section: Balancing scientific and societal impact—A challenging agenda for academic research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Realisation; Section (typography); Corporate governance; Special section; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Economics; Management; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6259160529110942,"score_gpt":0.6343178958835899,"score_spread":0.008401842972495688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801852815","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013323064,0.06687537,0.0076630786,0.21217476,0.68551487,0.0002952218,0.00096653576,0.0003927612,0.024785072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008494836,0.08166571,0.006721526,0.12168281,0.7252264,0.00056036195,0.0014469047,0.000503186,0.053698327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979961,0.00055520865,0.00022176374,0.0003745082,0.00066700624,0.00018556783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285335,0.009546666,0.001035645,0.0007292255,0.004022673,0.0018125712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045812796,0.0018015235,0.0017939516,0.003498016,0.0026220595,0.007312806,0.0022908137,0.0072520347,0.027630016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015602751,0.00058204366,0.0017400963,0.0028053694,0.0027746484,0.0055781426,0.0040315436,0.009237969,0.015094397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026073545,0.000043283166,0.00023293238,0.0004892078,0.000012354044,0.000089217916,0.00008276426,0.00010139947,0.0003373944,0.006171028,0.9717998,0.020614611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001151767,0.00006580303,0.0010024391,0.0008382261,0.000015659578,0.00023636005,0.00020645518,0.0001692485,0.00016078883,0.010445531,0.9868264,0.000021489273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015902428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023961072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024755239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036233824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092431545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801910647","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.17463abstract","title":"An Examination of the Funding-Finding Relation in the Field of Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Typology; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Funding Agency; Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.4957016888207452,"score_gpt":0.540564881162261,"score_spread":0.044863192341515756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801910647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726385,0.004553728,0.005227344,0.0028903424,0.00015020018,0.00012833194,0.0007502621,0.00004583639,0.013615583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521095,0.00067297823,0.00288157,0.00015415183,0.00007144088,0.00011013142,0.00024460934,0.000018077593,0.00063618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95610654,0.018197482,0.007039889,0.004857169,0.012012629,0.0017863296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2965924,0.51884043,0.123210914,0.024695627,0.031555917,0.005104719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08209684,0.00034742,0.000855244,0.017074894,0.0023509187,0.0036200047,0.0014584297,0.0010300212,0.0068288553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36608458,0.0003329901,0.0014757478,0.020284435,0.0039117103,0.0052965763,0.0048756255,0.0017983374,0.00057823665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011000898,0.000060153667,0.9673575,0.00046913602,0.00026198602,0.000087423374,0.002495271,0.00022214181,0.00038761992,0.003507921,0.00050408137,0.024536846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014844182,0.0001575455,0.9902954,0.00021936219,0.00015319572,0.0002588969,0.0026701952,0.00028677122,0.00037064156,0.0030909579,0.0024612073,0.000021008571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070015904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011577249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031189616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004838749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43417478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801923759","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2016.13895symposium","title":"The Organization of Science: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Productivity; Knowledge production; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Cross disciplinary; Work (physics); Production (economics); Media studies; Public relations; Management; Political science; Library science; Social science; Engineering; Computer science; Knowledge management; Data science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.40911810048985814,"score_gpt":0.5209899935145234,"score_spread":0.11187189302466521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801923759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028387964,0.11210382,0.22545935,0.222504,0.0025231813,0.00039701987,0.00026014267,0.0001305326,0.408234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386389,0.058663864,0.06974521,0.008027606,0.0038289567,0.0006640315,0.00016447614,0.00013951483,0.020127345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803237,0.01183851,0.0008922104,0.0017679115,0.0040753623,0.001102264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743062,0.013433004,0.002632894,0.002939401,0.0031653084,0.0035231425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020003539,0.00083118083,0.0014856452,0.017486146,0.006932293,0.026487935,0.002921056,0.0041643432,0.004991928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01841795,0.0007141233,0.0011513957,0.015937151,0.03869483,0.018664872,0.009186829,0.0044029984,0.00080457376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005368031,0.000017608347,0.0008360783,0.00012225192,0.000026462218,0.000060288323,0.00205822,0.00076023565,0.00004352546,0.9837742,0.0023007377,0.00999516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067737187,0.000013092882,0.00084070116,0.00024112785,0.000010937395,0.000047698646,0.002111079,0.0011653461,0.000035004403,0.95070946,0.044807326,0.000011373156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004003148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034250305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98251384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016216567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121498145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117659986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803613079","doi":"10.7202/1045308ar","title":"Les réseaux de coauteurs : 40 ans de collaborations à la revue Criminologie","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.9237201480428799,"score_gpt":0.6351712705646263,"score_spread":0.28854887747825364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803613079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93722576,0.0039195907,0.005960778,0.0045934613,0.00026546352,0.00033649968,0.0003620465,0.00008797419,0.04724847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783593,0.0015976775,0.0035287698,0.00043863594,0.000066056054,0.00050079706,0.00019626829,0.00005262522,0.015259886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97721535,0.012466911,0.0010388686,0.0029166064,0.00402598,0.0023362741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368628,0.029251356,0.0082030445,0.0042574694,0.01232626,0.00909897],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021212762,0.00062376866,0.00061848556,0.0040644994,0.01166544,0.009534254,0.0014873552,0.0019915095,0.008243649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044782873,0.00058859866,0.0006475155,0.0037480618,0.0068560657,0.007997598,0.009645562,0.002550369,0.0014238926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003211923,0.00018009977,0.098622315,0.00058308383,0.00010730502,0.00081507716,0.7714128,0.0002860594,0.0026202078,0.031666547,0.0034195762,0.08996565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039461276,0.00044430344,0.21761811,0.0010470097,0.0001356133,0.00072842545,0.59543353,0.0006018817,0.0025342435,0.0153387645,0.16588587,0.00019278046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03844341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0600585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012820224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014370524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11218512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804029226","doi":"","title":"Open Access for Journal Publications: The How-To Guide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.47360780207855646,"score_gpt":0.5397232857720806,"score_spread":0.06611548369352416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804029226","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011378081,0.033072293,0.14161874,0.5899318,0.026579037,0.00395849,0.0050571207,0.018344892,0.18029991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015247384,0.08609176,0.47507155,0.10095418,0.020554893,0.0055316845,0.0067436807,0.016217481,0.2735874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9053098,0.030675622,0.013454776,0.004473213,0.04344875,0.0026378508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58017224,0.14806268,0.017982334,0.05935376,0.14988205,0.04454694],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093461,0.001975696,0.0031445783,0.014752187,0.0069406363,0.05094112,0.0058561927,0.01284322,0.061332837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29943693,0.0027830906,0.0015682434,0.0194592,0.013837434,0.043859795,0.015460345,0.019894948,0.15747164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003400435,0.00009323836,0.00048732935,0.0009427263,0.000022416123,0.00014843018,0.0013498961,0.00017166651,0.0006349382,0.02849994,0.72135395,0.24626145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015438904,0.000015480748,0.00033758333,0.0011068067,0.000006096467,0.00013336199,0.00074052945,0.000112427755,0.00016768451,0.018493172,0.9788223,0.000049110942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015624363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028348513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007662992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056667794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4942749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804129512","doi":"10.1177/0844562118777328","title":"Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Publishing; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.9005290747628881,"score_gpt":0.7058359562956766,"score_spread":0.1946931184672115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804129512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06979172,0.012706996,0.097979724,0.54687506,0.009454889,0.0009270804,0.00080609537,0.00600639,0.2554521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5601093,0.019060692,0.22216883,0.04221794,0.0076912595,0.001189318,0.0014181889,0.0049232156,0.14122123],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.960668,0.013136491,0.0024348418,0.0016519567,0.01987861,0.0022301383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.790715,0.10215585,0.018621637,0.020547094,0.04411548,0.023844985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034369513,0.0007053774,0.0013428893,0.007569622,0.010611276,0.035012886,0.003989928,0.0076857745,0.034788337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24500138,0.00078592653,0.0008568248,0.009302548,0.008525378,0.044552647,0.01611735,0.007369927,0.01586315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015495978,0.00020351194,0.019846933,0.0007151081,0.0001186752,0.0009438465,0.015737744,0.0007727135,0.00080549665,0.0674282,0.2854801,0.60779274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007284349,0.00016638493,0.007773398,0.0015873851,0.00010349663,0.0012454705,0.034910332,0.0031246603,0.0010804594,0.22173464,0.7279407,0.0002602528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014729265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028438412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004174748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02835351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18176556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804203984","doi":"10.1002/asi.24028","title":"Co‐saved, co‐tweeted, and co‐cited networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Computer science; Social media; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Machine learning","score_opus":0.19676722602553115,"score_gpt":0.5112396376478187,"score_spread":0.3144724116222875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804203984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96196145,0.0020789413,0.011765353,0.00049242645,0.0000829544,0.00006719659,0.005880464,0.00031453572,0.017356725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233353,0.00044711272,0.0034960161,0.000018593344,0.00008415818,0.0000688327,0.0018176277,0.000029787807,0.0017045568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734014,0.00090265396,0.00027246898,0.0004242316,0.00088100764,0.0001794979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96207356,0.02611033,0.007679082,0.0018830949,0.001629808,0.00062413473],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026918051,0.0004906681,0.0005844925,0.021448923,0.0009669449,0.0026444886,0.00078243116,0.00056586624,0.004676688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037827134,0.00024809357,0.00055431214,0.023967795,0.00093345606,0.0047572087,0.0015751438,0.00047667077,0.00088056765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069769303,0.00014252923,0.82824945,0.0011103794,0.0011121025,0.0004146621,0.004830251,0.0057389406,0.0041090585,0.017315743,0.004143694,0.13213547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026325279,0.00022745409,0.9094309,0.0001895778,0.00039815903,0.0013824619,0.0042985105,0.039283313,0.0054854923,0.022391984,0.016745605,0.00014014737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025502185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005334816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010410715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031165345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015645146},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2807638568","doi":"10.1109/bigcomp.2018.00065","title":"Article Impact Value for Nearby Citation Network Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Computer science; Metadata; Value (mathematics); Similarity (geometry); Citation impact; Data science; Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Citation analysis; Data mining; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6134994399169142,"score_gpt":0.6385578056579951,"score_spread":0.02505836574108089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807638568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25049758,0.0029026377,0.71582264,0.00060031126,0.0003164462,0.0005146358,0.0029659932,0.0020153236,0.024364427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84163076,0.00070586504,0.15186518,0.000067040004,0.00029912175,0.00030156897,0.0021728347,0.00017555965,0.0027821183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967378,0.000741252,0.00026283035,0.00041604982,0.0016713854,0.0001707115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829258,0.011714484,0.0014586399,0.0010258283,0.0023952087,0.00048003366],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039510345,0.00063720247,0.0010002523,0.025274059,0.0011894045,0.0028179553,0.0012630876,0.0013043563,0.0035112146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037273653,0.00022456064,0.0008235172,0.016644571,0.0008281625,0.0034788158,0.0016075317,0.00077117677,0.00096339406],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004734813,0.00036429276,0.11177311,0.0006139599,0.0006319334,0.00042305078,0.00044199862,0.1594387,0.007818718,0.10817882,0.008468829,0.6013731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028926528,0.00011009684,0.02924449,0.00010084919,0.00013747191,0.0004310392,0.00024922215,0.8556088,0.005481324,0.099951304,0.008568025,0.00008834288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018229904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015238132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97472596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014557857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095795497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020895302},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2807688391","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000002735","title":"Highly Cited Works in Spinal Disorders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Calgary; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Back pain; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Scientific literature; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Lumbar spine; Guideline; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Lumbar; Library science; Surgery; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6544068845532449,"score_gpt":0.6320850456572747,"score_spread":0.02232183889597017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807688391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72977823,0.0735105,0.010403395,0.0026645123,0.00088807754,0.014606754,0.13789752,0.001229396,0.029021608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240051,0.016886525,0.016454915,0.00047027544,0.00070074043,0.014795214,0.02404736,0.00020040863,0.0024394859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787927,0.004132403,0.0058920337,0.0018641369,0.008560134,0.0007586423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91249037,0.0501997,0.02069189,0.0020661228,0.013178914,0.0013730188],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012283579,0.0012700097,0.003472614,0.13704759,0.0015047558,0.004524036,0.0018454179,0.0012400186,0.010279322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09789629,0.00048301244,0.0040508253,0.12813088,0.00096903526,0.0032886893,0.0036084377,0.00069112517,0.0019641612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019337429,0.00056524214,0.67668027,0.083330974,0.009750501,0.0008766538,0.0035978644,0.0021549298,0.0022591613,0.003117326,0.023270069,0.19246322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006456722,0.0009309329,0.9006067,0.009084444,0.012507965,0.0026759205,0.0073598693,0.0062261797,0.001987375,0.006105,0.05161101,0.00025907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020933144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024958134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021879934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004154981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064962566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808055521","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.01","title":"Losing Our Modesty: The Content and Communication of Peer Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Credibility; Object (grammar); Scholarly communication; Metadata; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Media studies; World Wide Web; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7996148986644458,"score_gpt":0.5840325802009457,"score_spread":0.21558231846350007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808055521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01609,0.00830971,0.120713085,0.6530661,0.01178073,0.00032402755,0.00012582919,0.0010136791,0.18857682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8074377,0.0071563735,0.051329188,0.06063347,0.023891997,0.0012064489,0.00019075873,0.001257792,0.046896245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6149904,0.2637476,0.02152326,0.019738296,0.07370105,0.0062993774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3895379,0.4237585,0.03303805,0.08838499,0.05536365,0.009916914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19051845,0.0008516516,0.0017688796,0.007268453,0.021991845,0.05668639,0.005520019,0.014302698,0.0067591695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53768253,0.0014930185,0.0012080928,0.0070035434,0.09066808,0.05154453,0.025246767,0.022462374,0.0040540933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009206985,0.000026912783,0.0011911083,0.00026336915,0.000055194854,0.00024101525,0.045310497,0.00044324461,0.00048542026,0.86105156,0.029519785,0.06131986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006308265,0.00007011018,0.00075162033,0.0009784623,0.00004787838,0.00023933826,0.007925636,0.00096052,0.00069440564,0.5432265,0.44487292,0.0001695543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066748187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002954298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015938533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036898185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808267801","doi":"","title":"Are Publication and Citation Counts Reliable Indicators of Research Productivity or Impact","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Citation; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Accounting; Political science; Business; Library science; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7945339118265194,"score_gpt":0.6796818802460064,"score_spread":0.11485203158051305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808267801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37770724,0.09036991,0.09297635,0.21368507,0.019121697,0.00029897608,0.017073307,0.002016589,0.1867509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93334156,0.016728027,0.025825715,0.006306297,0.00727963,0.0002505273,0.0042452617,0.0004291847,0.00559387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9260449,0.025053263,0.0076348837,0.007262403,0.031859484,0.0021451374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47878176,0.30404907,0.082562774,0.03210286,0.09872976,0.0037737903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05842839,0.00081934984,0.0023775275,0.014470833,0.0011158793,0.013777639,0.0025933476,0.0033824358,0.0031380574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39836562,0.0006545223,0.00095962296,0.021998754,0.005179929,0.012944156,0.002883312,0.0028489733,0.003789452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082773465,0.0003647547,0.39236903,0.0040655937,0.0014051198,0.00029290267,0.0034731678,0.002561471,0.0021432347,0.11024827,0.1069908,0.37525806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046050255,0.00056709856,0.5202072,0.0056079887,0.0015249756,0.00080695946,0.0067225015,0.01297044,0.009960326,0.20518643,0.2354145,0.0005709558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006687319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062664803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00331652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053460468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30900258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808590901","doi":"","title":"Canadian National reports 1Q decline in profit, revenue, but cites 'momentum'","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transport topics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Revenue; Profit (economics); Momentum (technical analysis); Business; Economics; International trade; Commerce; Finance; Microeconomics; Fishery","score_opus":0.42173709773100965,"score_gpt":0.5310813724993377,"score_spread":0.10934427476832809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808590901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014052635,0.007701827,0.00041134076,0.16875131,0.0077695064,0.00029010233,0.27655873,0.0008272943,0.5236372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09009711,0.01322615,0.0017810295,0.017975055,0.002328705,0.00019727567,0.08319015,0.00042505783,0.79077953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98194355,0.00027762848,0.0004633224,0.0004341264,0.015297624,0.0015838667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9276241,0.0034825266,0.0018343927,0.00093276426,0.06193566,0.00419049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038952648,0.0006578455,0.0006866876,0.016221596,0.006653001,0.008763579,0.0017262799,0.0030552826,0.055507965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026073616,0.00045445558,0.00088382495,0.029259982,0.0013489358,0.0016217042,0.001684042,0.0027043447,0.00816506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026630985,0.000019927587,0.004151771,0.00020426622,0.000013938708,0.00003828095,0.00018202256,0.00006877598,0.000076129305,0.005689763,0.9799242,0.009604365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020627878,0.000011448015,0.058698017,0.00019368224,0.000042594816,0.000030556173,0.000907686,0.00021670229,0.0003424374,0.0005840164,0.9389079,0.000044348155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99615014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08920454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08920454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23415948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808971281","doi":"","title":"Åpen tilgang til vitenskapelig publisering","year":2016,"lang":"no","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Publishing; Publication; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6450189691488819,"score_gpt":0.5384833821347461,"score_spread":0.10653558701413579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808971281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01594029,0.058888018,0.0149515355,0.113085344,0.09982631,0.00037080297,0.0051978445,0.0025743197,0.6891656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0816072,0.031617273,0.015219184,0.009161708,0.0085270405,0.00023602702,0.0050441464,0.0033851303,0.84520227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263144,0.0015376131,0.00048303543,0.0013212711,0.003194212,0.00083243434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236214,0.0016149979,0.00052617386,0.0007053593,0.0027436926,0.002047585],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006109972,0.0013995696,0.0011556657,0.001960966,0.00455036,0.015618461,0.0015503494,0.003577825,0.22173305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018794999,0.0005922221,0.0008927346,0.0018178151,0.002557817,0.007805631,0.0062248837,0.0046733287,0.118078575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024284431,0.00017825174,0.0012524002,0.0010120786,0.000026093501,0.0012011209,0.00697487,0.0009321131,0.0019494424,0.054340623,0.6880744,0.24381578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007671954,0.000017481625,0.00030449487,0.0003998027,0.0000045712745,0.00011600133,0.00097527844,0.00010238858,0.00024628403,0.0032268153,0.9945834,0.000015856565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009903977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010311823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039773122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011489743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.741771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809373312","doi":"10.1002/gch2.201800004","title":"A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Global Challenges","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research; York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Norges Forskningsråd; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Typology; Advisory committee; Political science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Engineering; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8541696912354003,"score_gpt":0.6475795331653768,"score_spread":0.20659015807002357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809373312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052829474,0.07609628,0.19927953,0.052656256,0.0032145053,0.002874324,0.0011592477,0.0005063755,0.611384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75376534,0.044618033,0.14976582,0.010447164,0.0019350762,0.0066763246,0.0013658736,0.0002510194,0.03117536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87033886,0.08759705,0.010761454,0.0064863823,0.021636344,0.003179971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87460923,0.0737403,0.015430865,0.010239346,0.022769216,0.0032109441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05717742,0.00075367524,0.0007746262,0.0207905,0.006145622,0.014299942,0.003080293,0.004896399,0.0063857785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09841521,0.00063885585,0.0009840436,0.027625648,0.015935482,0.013141639,0.0062188515,0.0023952457,0.0016738487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043456424,0.000029748338,0.005757824,0.002240594,0.0000583628,0.00033494248,0.024171507,0.00087634794,0.00033464681,0.84755415,0.019706095,0.09889239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038753537,0.00006028361,0.0051483884,0.0031502366,0.000051161747,0.0010690474,0.029055972,0.0010777656,0.00025119132,0.3345565,0.6254723,0.000068425164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003965098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003962991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009600675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012530221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30238676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809533743","doi":"10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.18","title":"The Public Knowledge Project: Reflections and Directions After Its First Two Decades","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Principal (computer security); Scholarship; Software; Publishing; Political science; Code (set theory); Sample (material); Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Library science; Computer security; Set (abstract data type); Law","score_opus":0.7158824423329107,"score_gpt":0.6390853384108165,"score_spread":0.07679710392209416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809533743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020268632,0.028222645,0.0020290317,0.9176299,0.006654008,0.000040823114,0.00013684982,0.00005543325,0.024962742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56089944,0.06253358,0.006989212,0.31968018,0.008160033,0.00049772346,0.00041330347,0.0009068658,0.039919637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9567858,0.021054214,0.0016788052,0.0024603524,0.012618579,0.0054022726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8536863,0.095369734,0.004764477,0.005912423,0.016977722,0.023289371],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07780583,0.00072338595,0.0008859493,0.0035311114,0.015219271,0.037624672,0.002857811,0.016350217,0.0064176316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10361117,0.0006303348,0.0007272858,0.006713682,0.04219352,0.034557194,0.02063011,0.030121844,0.001449123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001780783,0.00028112184,0.0038695864,0.00073572254,0.000028467268,0.0006757241,0.120028354,0.00028344808,0.00040320805,0.48468634,0.30810535,0.08072467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021528429,0.000057312103,0.0024877286,0.00148381,0.000006840243,0.0001992271,0.11118847,0.0001526266,0.00031150287,0.04634038,0.8376963,0.000054337095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018218651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01709525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019796107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03756789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4114815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809665810","doi":"10.5958/2249-5576.2018.00002.x","title":"A bibliometric study of world research output on e-resources during 2006–2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Regional science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.2437621560870567,"score_gpt":0.559097465874093,"score_spread":0.31533530978703633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809665810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77347803,0.012548693,0.0033808912,0.0018601022,0.00036597345,0.00035729527,0.1250826,0.00070610165,0.082220346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89736795,0.011516894,0.0035223735,0.000128019,0.00046432824,0.00032346413,0.07711792,0.00012559701,0.009433329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942054,0.0005294699,0.0013882626,0.0005046755,0.0030091268,0.0003630568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823767,0.0043786294,0.0066238744,0.00067491835,0.0053834827,0.0005624226],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038750395,0.00060391537,0.0008619164,0.059568815,0.0008071435,0.0039242287,0.000608961,0.00049795833,0.0029863578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02023718,0.0001922154,0.0012488866,0.13617454,0.0005407703,0.0036538977,0.0016061976,0.00052053586,0.0017313327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044789937,0.00020158933,0.66480285,0.0061263666,0.00077758456,0.0010592383,0.0052108555,0.004822364,0.0023489497,0.006620676,0.036888156,0.27069336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010398933,0.00013055201,0.928258,0.00064501184,0.00019476231,0.000792278,0.0029952386,0.002369585,0.0015434013,0.00081220333,0.062192217,0.000056271834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006198022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005224904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027981077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003045118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020493388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809867448","doi":"10.1044/2018_aja-17-0107","title":"Audiology Faculty Author Impact Metrics as a Function of Institution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Audiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Accreditation; Institution; Rank (graph theory); Psychology; Bibliometrics; Medical education; Statistics; Medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.47138702542643024,"score_gpt":0.6087065498491919,"score_spread":0.13731952442276169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809867448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9557591,0.0011977607,0.023659538,0.00046390475,0.00007443493,0.00032368663,0.00599294,0.00065194035,0.0118766865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742343,0.00049820193,0.02112865,0.000050905404,0.00006955449,0.00022470286,0.0027412958,0.00006581645,0.0009866101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914486,0.0013887743,0.0009850579,0.00061468914,0.005250665,0.00031215476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353963,0.024924917,0.01829972,0.0030797268,0.016231358,0.0020679897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010193469,0.00055732916,0.00065855053,0.01934955,0.0006146002,0.0033877818,0.0006272096,0.00034400995,0.0021503526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051866896,0.00015385788,0.0007389287,0.022882525,0.0005371916,0.0021984053,0.001737562,0.0005587406,0.00077661854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017615699,0.00013592548,0.871235,0.0002965142,0.00025257855,0.000067571,0.00051414134,0.0035567894,0.0027517194,0.00089341734,0.0023080949,0.117812105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015027481,0.00041715926,0.97823536,0.00012359956,0.00008999609,0.0002889655,0.0011424094,0.010023425,0.004135604,0.0012873444,0.004184686,0.000056529043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030923104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059056776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98980653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016858388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017259406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053908825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809971035","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.42159","title":"Evaluating Academic Research Networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Position (finance); Institutional research; Curriculum; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Higher education; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9653113425368469,"score_gpt":0.7773576803100251,"score_spread":0.18795366222682186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809971035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302591,0.001065088,0.016821528,0.00093035825,0.000107891436,0.001201605,0.0037260463,0.00013289833,0.045755338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875728,0.00020584212,0.009030851,0.00002743931,0.000033396074,0.0005085457,0.0015163618,0.000011063469,0.0010936687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658626,0.01768128,0.003133284,0.002407714,0.009820873,0.0010943372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78070337,0.13756536,0.03427009,0.0059931767,0.03467247,0.0067955344],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02752687,0.0006518392,0.0007223585,0.020672694,0.0023717291,0.0063071433,0.0011708523,0.0010911609,0.0056689433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1557159,0.00020965528,0.00066396216,0.021308344,0.0010584843,0.0055371523,0.0038631675,0.00055379805,0.00075462786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054853293,0.00037198424,0.8441113,0.0006543446,0.0006197435,0.00014787425,0.0027800945,0.016889382,0.00045053425,0.015859328,0.0040936475,0.113473274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361651,0.0013509277,0.683625,0.0008180151,0.0009211244,0.00036346746,0.02949053,0.2070571,0.004342381,0.038854357,0.03278381,0.00015709664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012963527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012059601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006877798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047640116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14557773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810937555","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-05581-4","title":"A better measure of research from the global south","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.6442479540031415,"score_gpt":0.6357522591561631,"score_spread":0.00849569484697843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810937555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5234296,0.0270753,0.07265547,0.029397544,0.0019694655,0.0002965912,0.014400978,0.0008420653,0.32993308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96349937,0.003730943,0.020311432,0.002440343,0.0010441538,0.00021070943,0.0035771052,0.00016906906,0.005016926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933554,0.0020588187,0.00084061665,0.0011376764,0.0022781114,0.00032939433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96265095,0.011416236,0.010015408,0.004385522,0.009098618,0.002433215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007782201,0.0007062006,0.0014776805,0.028616004,0.0014863365,0.007757302,0.0006557685,0.0012899775,0.007989234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028426426,0.00021768884,0.0009839657,0.03316186,0.0023585283,0.011015747,0.004239,0.0015941049,0.0011115877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049328944,0.00026981204,0.41791603,0.0049776854,0.004089426,0.00055734033,0.01120399,0.003963883,0.01772388,0.20755304,0.033862997,0.2973886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012016438,0.00041100194,0.6768253,0.0015529597,0.0015463374,0.0012671762,0.014003288,0.0025790683,0.0068471325,0.12025307,0.17442168,0.00017281208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003167159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005522266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002347745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027967189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04115671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811055236","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.15256.2","title":"What is a predatory journal? A scoping review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Grey literature; Web of science; CINAHL; Medicine; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9152973410968032,"score_gpt":0.7496890964298902,"score_spread":0.16560824466691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811055236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013575469,0.987097,0.00035601377,0.005915776,0.0010922838,0.0009473667,0.0006301513,0.000017964305,0.0025858844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009156231,0.98404515,0.0015283112,0.0021488199,0.00058874185,0.0015553728,0.00057664415,0.000017533841,0.0003832341],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587811,0.0153072765,0.015514755,0.0019747023,0.007683316,0.0007388617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7735875,0.15549113,0.032589424,0.0035084009,0.03149839,0.003325223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03717089,0.0012192607,0.004669389,0.045346484,0.0030666953,0.008979359,0.0028091713,0.004440955,0.008042674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19664942,0.001571683,0.002857398,0.042543944,0.0032789037,0.011048965,0.0040505948,0.0021680354,0.0019396998],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017627345,0.000056210552,0.002712101,0.80448073,0.0012065661,0.00037202585,0.0035431108,0.00012469786,0.00029745168,0.002964998,0.027076492,0.15698932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024563598,0.000052672298,0.0027332688,0.9335522,0.0013496408,0.00024283177,0.0017296742,0.00004326953,0.00006795739,0.00075504114,0.0594223,0.000026538264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007306772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016407626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99555904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010968031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033538632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19658077},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2811150674","doi":"10.1111/jan.13771","title":"So, you want to start a new nursing journal? Stop, read this first","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Privilege (computing); Nothing; Mainstream; Optimism; Quality (philosophy); Amateur; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2848995196669989,"score_gpt":0.5592680815274333,"score_spread":0.27436856186043446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811150674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008785739,0.030340267,0.0038217965,0.42813918,0.2396419,0.0005374569,0.0011705308,0.0032189616,0.2843442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036854677,0.033222657,0.015010249,0.32835832,0.09330466,0.0006567301,0.0014412536,0.0028807882,0.48827064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617046,0.0009411401,0.00029400928,0.00030044783,0.0019013385,0.00039255613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539329,0.005671018,0.004840835,0.001611508,0.01326819,0.020675564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026361083,0.0009056303,0.00087027164,0.0020827844,0.004783528,0.014698841,0.0014841189,0.005541257,0.18824147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047231898,0.0006445343,0.0011377947,0.001755606,0.001851513,0.012178555,0.005341586,0.006381393,0.18707597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030870615,0.00009833498,0.00091127225,0.00055898103,0.000014765511,0.00015614188,0.00095688365,0.000008870022,0.00047443682,0.00082284596,0.9523959,0.043570656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034885,0.000078442616,0.0022227284,0.000743849,0.00002602004,0.00092508015,0.003061672,0.000031375595,0.00034028475,0.0014615443,0.9910198,0.00005428703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010013388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003945008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99736387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001374845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004007622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62973046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2833021694","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021233","title":"What can we learn from top-cited articles in inflammatory bowel disease? A bibliometric analysis and assessment of the level of evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Medicine; Inflammatory bowel disease; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Disease; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.7925630835302033,"score_gpt":0.6323913316403316,"score_spread":0.16017175188987176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2833021694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.335318,0.5705405,0.01688362,0.031498566,0.0017825945,0.002471299,0.021930816,0.000592574,0.0189821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8078772,0.1469047,0.030312112,0.0017820989,0.0021658004,0.0021203733,0.007867069,0.00014193794,0.0008287008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9139683,0.022568643,0.027249727,0.0043991734,0.03066575,0.0011484246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46315098,0.4230707,0.05578768,0.008015438,0.045857914,0.004117303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07184946,0.001455079,0.0095780995,0.19608152,0.0021035671,0.019133206,0.0031722423,0.0030523632,0.0039236844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41771942,0.00080019986,0.00743025,0.1656586,0.0025376095,0.015664164,0.0048655816,0.002213895,0.0009800475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094109494,0.00032086464,0.3558067,0.11690671,0.024686603,0.0010844277,0.005994081,0.0019971028,0.0007790694,0.0044551725,0.012757226,0.4742711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524847,0.0014129488,0.6783695,0.09751783,0.05361139,0.005137425,0.01816818,0.01118489,0.0018265729,0.06500777,0.06619971,0.00081129663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021830176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037677754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92815053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058917697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3799808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2838196109","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.019","title":"Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Leverhulme Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.8305750337389989,"score_gpt":0.6893394636568446,"score_spread":0.14123557008215426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2838196109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48171356,0.17733921,0.19531101,0.07212247,0.009783911,0.003265435,0.0059754285,0.0013730862,0.05311595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934306,0.012160854,0.03872289,0.0044625727,0.003569423,0.0012856665,0.0014557426,0.0004293411,0.0036074948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.68966603,0.18016577,0.04765004,0.028422065,0.049232513,0.0048636617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08236841,0.65116346,0.119756825,0.09794563,0.044829816,0.003935894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34500292,0.0011280747,0.0027716984,0.016250378,0.004533951,0.013903948,0.0041207816,0.0049058367,0.009875425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76141393,0.0013054656,0.004143136,0.022795763,0.006790424,0.01923383,0.006385806,0.0039709173,0.002708526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017209678,0.00032380095,0.5402415,0.011683045,0.0076788617,0.0022259534,0.018140884,0.0023668082,0.0045043007,0.072957344,0.01885549,0.3193011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007844143,0.0012837169,0.42754018,0.014810498,0.0058053834,0.0076019703,0.0245724,0.009235669,0.013331781,0.33860382,0.15559077,0.000839328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027044448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024418018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038614224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007513013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80772805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2860074735","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0197775","title":"Words by the tail: Assessing lexical diversity in scholarly titles using frequency-rank distribution tail fits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Zipf's law; Word lists by frequency; Discipline; Scientometrics; Microdata (statistics); Rank (graph theory); Diversity (politics); Computer science; Statistics; Social science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Sociology; Library science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.686871493058404,"score_gpt":0.5087649493474646,"score_spread":0.17810654371093937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2860074735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9283182,0.0010167361,0.05520467,0.00020488945,0.00003701126,0.00011208764,0.0032940465,0.00084892893,0.010963507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99109274,0.00012749858,0.005622351,0.000028834516,0.000036863803,0.00006158389,0.002220304,0.000076653654,0.00073317223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955936,0.0012460374,0.0004733576,0.00068832055,0.0017137501,0.00028495313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94248253,0.036912948,0.009159059,0.0041397056,0.0057240874,0.0015816616],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739102,0.0005225171,0.0008253263,0.018744167,0.00088411174,0.0039696805,0.00084253674,0.0011603555,0.004019091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062248368,0.0002239585,0.0007656227,0.016205106,0.0014769862,0.005185857,0.0024419983,0.00081955956,0.001958749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007431463,0.00014272804,0.8196965,0.000423535,0.0004912815,0.0003481821,0.003463836,0.009320214,0.0065553505,0.008451019,0.0028171006,0.14754716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031828884,0.00044658742,0.9067233,0.00014132384,0.00016529144,0.0008208621,0.0039335187,0.053422693,0.0050653494,0.021337263,0.007711999,0.00019996469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025522169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021300318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007808967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006721917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03564018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2864151529","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0198033","title":"Social reference managers and their users: A survey of demographics and ideologies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Altmetrics; Demographics; Social media; Work (physics); World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Data science; Key (lock); Internet privacy; Scale (ratio); Knowledge management; Sociology; Publishing; Geography; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.846625054880739,"score_gpt":0.5421992250965223,"score_spread":0.30442582978421673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2864151529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99845827,0.000075668744,0.0000698584,0.00013658279,0.0000016789463,0.000024132034,0.00036376933,0.0000036286206,0.0008665163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753666,0.00025620166,0.00026575846,0.000108579785,0.000014304695,0.00010106705,0.00050519384,0.000005591274,0.0012067527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862397,0.0005051495,0.00013635388,0.00013592024,0.00041142193,0.00018727125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919477,0.0024507088,0.0032930938,0.0003063817,0.0009785433,0.0010235851],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002217108,0.00014857574,0.00029533223,0.0039637988,0.0010873092,0.0013944859,0.0002894284,0.00047134486,0.003399246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007552397,0.0002218405,0.00015947384,0.0031013137,0.0005398353,0.002388586,0.0013861728,0.000448281,0.00090774166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054904613,0.00011888988,0.9602029,0.00005028073,0.000013950861,0.000104755476,0.024640853,0.000028786553,0.000588304,0.00021461348,0.00085480866,0.013126919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007228298,0.00018039029,0.93908376,0.000030519986,0.000008883974,0.00021290856,0.054658018,0.00020396072,0.00015749234,0.000115084156,0.0053234096,0.000018257264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004908556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007258935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006012895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051215146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011725366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883394577","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.03","title":"Review Boards for Scientific Publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Criticism; Public relations; Peer review; Scientific writing; Political science; Scientific progress; Scientific communication; Path (computing); Pipeline (software); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6753861425574477,"score_gpt":0.571562453929783,"score_spread":0.10382368862766467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883394577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006621065,0.03182802,0.10621113,0.26476324,0.2138566,0.009989628,0.0015052941,0.0050136694,0.36021137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13097648,0.02836882,0.15809116,0.09071878,0.11246303,0.018654125,0.004163999,0.004002871,0.45256075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7445184,0.10438986,0.029327055,0.019320676,0.09166308,0.010780817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.419258,0.08438391,0.044445425,0.071085766,0.3268984,0.053928487],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17823732,0.0016407095,0.002309763,0.0070185848,0.010418918,0.027287371,0.005685303,0.014318082,0.052092236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4359222,0.0019036625,0.0019977735,0.0053445864,0.008099643,0.0112939505,0.008572349,0.016316248,0.06152848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013060228,0.00007306419,0.0011547037,0.0011982376,0.00007339634,0.0002668492,0.0013547714,0.00017068545,0.0015030113,0.10537074,0.7188509,0.16985297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007827503,0.000051400442,0.0010618701,0.00046629272,0.00003192552,0.0001905432,0.0002339474,0.0001633808,0.00047341,0.01038314,0.9868261,0.000039610506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002935471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004275613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97271264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009211049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0576519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883553729","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.05","title":"A Mixed-Methods Study of the Ex Post Funding Incentive Policy for Scholarly Publications in Turkey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turkish; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.569235225060658,"score_gpt":0.5980257545883764,"score_spread":0.028790529527718323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883553729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970181,0.00033850293,0.0011240181,0.000108018416,0.000027601349,0.00065942766,0.00018340413,0.0000047442336,0.00053622393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289227,0.0001822787,0.003275496,0.00022794708,0.000034080706,0.0023053663,0.00032226354,0.000007758131,0.00075258233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711911,0.020627934,0.002298276,0.0025905157,0.0019188024,0.0013732817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9338739,0.0466344,0.01073236,0.0036690147,0.003993801,0.0010965114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025055537,0.0006013142,0.0011660563,0.0015136875,0.0017363384,0.0027006713,0.0014625404,0.0015854208,0.002873308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04104306,0.00060944376,0.0014449573,0.001989508,0.0012364514,0.0014291228,0.001140218,0.0012228073,0.00036785283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013768525,0.027775964,0.7899971,0.0037358797,0.0027066842,0.0013918155,0.035187524,0.0016219899,0.0022119996,0.008506842,0.0021045671,0.11099111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024262993,0.02538849,0.8808825,0.00090311194,0.0026163792,0.0007175281,0.05979566,0.010081174,0.0043989234,0.0036714687,0.008793925,0.00032454653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049305097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004638593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99848634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036257454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042262846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13250798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883757404","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.010","title":"Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of six major psychiatry journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychiatric Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Rank correlation; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Impact factor; Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Multivariate analysis; Statistics; Medicine; Library science; Mathematics; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.5968616088670978,"score_gpt":0.6301201752005898,"score_spread":0.033258566333492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883757404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904985,0.0045711705,0.00049777294,0.00037560152,0.00006220658,0.00009027737,0.0018048183,0.000052808035,0.0020468002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995911,0.0015076654,0.000694869,0.00004020736,0.0001280852,0.00004519859,0.0013906137,0.0000173637,0.00026495388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906929,0.002457493,0.0025821,0.00069646497,0.0031722628,0.00039866136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87593997,0.07056839,0.025509378,0.0028995564,0.021884395,0.0031983992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009253449,0.00047860967,0.0017253739,0.036714196,0.0012516272,0.004478218,0.0008386628,0.00084516365,0.0032161954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095915735,0.00018966278,0.0023125657,0.04984607,0.0006783036,0.0019198495,0.0015187612,0.00040274198,0.00062466704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022363255,0.00034855772,0.91348183,0.0015833412,0.0031524496,0.00032305054,0.001344023,0.0005726454,0.0020162195,0.0003017448,0.0014739085,0.07316596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001178042,0.0005595224,0.99208766,0.00012523567,0.0016327528,0.00043851545,0.0016846036,0.0009462399,0.00064799114,0.00037651928,0.0013501643,0.000033069595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029539817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99074656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014625151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034012434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04893744},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2884205353","doi":"10.4995/carma2018.2018.8333","title":"Validation of innovation indicators from companies’ websites","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Web mining; Computer science; Data science; Measure (data warehouse); Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Business; Data mining; World Wide Web; Web page; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.5691687130048282,"score_gpt":0.5754617317958987,"score_spread":0.0062930187910704705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884205353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96460396,0.00025966502,0.008304282,0.00017895378,0.000047892543,0.0009779535,0.009604145,0.00019864505,0.015824525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95051664,0.00026557254,0.020817108,0.00009763301,0.000047213638,0.002163483,0.023065634,0.000079651785,0.0029470068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982691,0.003038138,0.0018827292,0.0012633973,0.010006307,0.0011184255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86746,0.035192065,0.014689886,0.009167939,0.07048296,0.0030071686],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013414535,0.0006229019,0.0006497255,0.02122257,0.0014123505,0.0030348948,0.0011790331,0.00081793865,0.001679478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06903725,0.0003048056,0.0006935066,0.023026453,0.00083968433,0.002161643,0.0016590465,0.00072231446,0.0011139897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028150622,0.00062793,0.8762649,0.00051886507,0.00014418946,0.00024495966,0.0032774035,0.0014607707,0.0067564743,0.0016620783,0.0025850923,0.10617581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019251516,0.00017929787,0.97603333,0.00009903384,0.000049627477,0.00010326302,0.0022538688,0.004786195,0.00752986,0.00029667382,0.00861143,0.000038191178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06581401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0695145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037542114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073059313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13086188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884457462","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.1-2.05","title":"Awareness of Altmetrics among LIS Scholars and Faculty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Library science; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3458624147787211,"score_gpt":0.5465233660001863,"score_spread":0.20066095122146516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884457462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933333,0.00030962675,0.00059853686,0.0009205154,0.000012347142,0.000018935723,0.00011109217,0.00002274316,0.004672987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.00031298236,0.00041453182,0.0002528442,0.000051797582,0.000015614425,0.00009808655,0.0000063218076,0.00067058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937304,0.0021740159,0.00095055863,0.00047171177,0.0022094091,0.00046393598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90218574,0.045164745,0.029684225,0.0035299682,0.013137581,0.006297775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010765015,0.000109353,0.00039076922,0.004780902,0.0012254122,0.0026895145,0.000509524,0.00065482425,0.0041081714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056885753,0.00017897334,0.00032895285,0.0046351333,0.0015960125,0.003446969,0.0018269488,0.0007160082,0.0005471728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066664485,0.00011343731,0.9231735,0.00013468394,0.000028712257,0.00014426207,0.03614786,0.00008210286,0.00077704113,0.00053406885,0.0007935878,0.0380041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008203171,0.0002866211,0.9338324,0.000105323525,0.00003643624,0.0004497763,0.055629708,0.000570558,0.0007964105,0.00074947026,0.0074803256,0.000054771815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064841523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077754976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020107192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020865065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056931555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884599176","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.01","title":"Early Career Researchers' Quest for Reputation in the Digital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Desk; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7239339683949573,"score_gpt":0.5697957248491814,"score_spread":0.15413824354577588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884599176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7592015,0.013835048,0.033820458,0.03196787,0.0010153402,0.00035579712,0.00018191706,0.00018367988,0.15943831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760138,0.0024509733,0.011240723,0.00061437004,0.00030160282,0.000109934444,0.000051306986,0.00003727046,0.009180126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9243697,0.053791028,0.003264602,0.0021340342,0.014132357,0.002308285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71733177,0.1504411,0.040464513,0.013037064,0.063204914,0.015520651],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07807954,0.00038494507,0.00073190464,0.009738693,0.0052779783,0.022610541,0.0014497442,0.0018852862,0.0036788639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19757052,0.00038111946,0.00039028656,0.00683668,0.005100999,0.013637189,0.008869016,0.0022446336,0.0014053676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000681893,0.0003388268,0.20283228,0.001057102,0.00011959038,0.0011008293,0.20775287,0.0007105495,0.0028271566,0.11831483,0.009392865,0.45487124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119589124,0.0013888174,0.20872569,0.002567308,0.00019937482,0.0030572303,0.31389883,0.005359217,0.006211741,0.12590645,0.33203736,0.0005283711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018426374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031704952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004678346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062414194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.412929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885706996","doi":"","title":"Grant Hunting in Corporatized Universities: Experiences from Canada and Finland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Economic history; History; Economics","score_opus":0.22508561001555577,"score_gpt":0.4409658864400707,"score_spread":0.2158802764245149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885706996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197322,0.0038977272,0.00061522966,0.013670382,0.0002609385,0.00017741864,0.0004535545,0.00006639457,0.061126217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675212,0.0018075103,0.00052975223,0.0021425153,0.00004430876,0.00005716442,0.00029731117,0.000054346765,0.027545968],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886933,0.0017351517,0.00036428223,0.00073761,0.0033416082,0.0051279687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97144294,0.009016264,0.0020777474,0.0011376595,0.0051562954,0.011169029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006844118,0.00034077125,0.00091006956,0.0038447017,0.06108302,0.01657491,0.0043705744,0.004878808,0.009767153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02193671,0.0005737695,0.0004940545,0.013152638,0.014546258,0.003970484,0.012252125,0.00394685,0.0008587562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034197146,0.0003900382,0.11131378,0.00042910175,0.0000783202,0.0053337226,0.7143293,0.00048169788,0.0009528114,0.038143244,0.029599272,0.09860674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030945004,0.00007308783,0.063203916,0.0003934302,0.000040021107,0.0004510003,0.7966546,0.00026286778,0.00039046086,0.001573676,0.13684006,0.00008587428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93375754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98189837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08225267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22462459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5967877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885938669","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137","title":"Canadian and South African Scholars’ Use of Institutional Repositories, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Public relations; Institutional repository; Political science; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Sociology; Publishing; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5306997556260317,"score_gpt":0.5178407325566584,"score_spread":0.012859023069373254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885938669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120644,0.007182624,0.0005643295,0.019694759,0.0002241861,0.00020388328,0.00068200997,0.000058474237,0.05932533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799258,0.0046996144,0.0012358588,0.0018947131,0.000032076194,0.000081723105,0.00011921753,0.000033835815,0.011977076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800755,0.004690417,0.00076654326,0.0010076415,0.0031950683,0.0023327041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644363,0.01340593,0.004800487,0.001600933,0.0077205016,0.008035903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014526927,0.00043414434,0.00056363235,0.0084099,0.02898014,0.014116414,0.0015339997,0.0017542278,0.005904594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527898,0.00045943417,0.0003611021,0.019042702,0.010641145,0.0052446797,0.0075404043,0.0011917135,0.00035967457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007949403,0.000025903406,0.039048493,0.00046948268,0.000017218992,0.001031404,0.8979739,0.00006383109,0.00076504087,0.017757995,0.00437827,0.038389016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009196839,0.00003166031,0.02817635,0.00066685496,0.000029466051,0.00043156257,0.87696666,0.000053399497,0.00032940248,0.000843928,0.09239927,0.000062167375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8492223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9266161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060643915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12098092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4400044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886105060","doi":"10.1017/pan.2018.12","title":"Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Analysis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":550,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Citation; Gender gap; Politics; Publication; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; Gender studies; Political science; Demographic economics; Law","score_opus":0.7631996924929744,"score_gpt":0.6632523770784542,"score_spread":0.09994731541452018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886105060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95260954,0.015139856,0.002838696,0.0023447468,0.000222157,0.000083945386,0.004828881,0.000107973916,0.021824297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98815656,0.0030255974,0.001421092,0.00023929618,0.00020841091,0.00007443689,0.002592058,0.00006391247,0.0042186957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889402,0.0025505754,0.0018259458,0.0016345289,0.0040759905,0.0009728789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8731368,0.062822014,0.026398592,0.00653233,0.027338697,0.0037714394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011473426,0.00029209265,0.00072366867,0.02032523,0.0010957437,0.0030604894,0.0008096595,0.0008195349,0.0056504486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08999514,0.0002519291,0.0006383446,0.022967,0.001282634,0.0033045104,0.0027770174,0.0004759262,0.0014502082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048814696,0.000076665456,0.8361839,0.001559638,0.00037452864,0.00045416696,0.022659881,0.00047727814,0.0038966676,0.015361723,0.006246523,0.112220846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025587316,0.00014929655,0.94802254,0.0006818757,0.00012596727,0.0007533218,0.01022582,0.00087687315,0.0021562409,0.01105881,0.0258733,0.000050362483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002861282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052390657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012714439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014571588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060678005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887204237","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.3.2018-0008.08","title":"Does Interdisciplinary Integration Affect LIS Doctoral Students’ Publishing Productivity and Quality in North America?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Productivity; Library science; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Discipline; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Social science; Economic growth; Medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.26239301872770476,"score_gpt":0.5439334882733927,"score_spread":0.28154046954568795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887204237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891094,0.0027877032,0.00013071229,0.00178272,0.000022146418,0.000006294284,0.00020356127,0.000010437719,0.0059469217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965564,0.0017477793,0.00017871929,0.0001815919,0.000060747116,0.000007704634,0.00021165452,0.0000059596678,0.0010494319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983783,0.0003742046,0.00015616314,0.00023538657,0.000617902,0.00023806292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96928686,0.006146348,0.013688061,0.0007643315,0.00624361,0.003870783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032940907,0.00014742037,0.0004194919,0.00433092,0.0013839443,0.003960885,0.00040475727,0.00042769423,0.0022946803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013547639,0.00016196471,0.00029090096,0.009035906,0.00083204935,0.002457834,0.0019079963,0.0006483924,0.00036776357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102357,0.00009491253,0.94171154,0.00014526902,0.00010396552,0.0002690603,0.011298413,0.00013948871,0.00057970424,0.0005572401,0.00093797245,0.044060208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810148,0.000023107235,0.98958313,0.00004504627,0.000026372336,0.00006678545,0.006779801,0.00008230127,0.00013160889,0.00014980495,0.0031018278,0.0000053631966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038700834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06874648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002634424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004259857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07695109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887998895","doi":"10.7554/elife.29319","title":"Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Open science; Incentive; Thematic analysis; Public relations; Science policy; Open data; Intellectual property; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.8882448692560714,"score_gpt":0.7166902763157139,"score_spread":0.17155459294035746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887998895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87294483,0.0011955996,0.029599825,0.04196793,0.0003522981,0.0013115798,0.00012721453,0.00008904422,0.052411735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898155,0.00030862822,0.0057186116,0.0019712208,0.00007543882,0.0009782057,0.00002531112,0.000020920632,0.0010862071],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.65156424,0.30566785,0.0097731035,0.0059677633,0.01746728,0.009559806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42169374,0.47702017,0.053102475,0.013441017,0.016620383,0.01812213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2092464,0.0005257695,0.00076728035,0.0046920236,0.010069237,0.014179589,0.0023336944,0.0037716741,0.003948695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33261737,0.00066243287,0.0006903523,0.0031691077,0.016110431,0.009377446,0.017104596,0.0040845745,0.00044608847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045898612,0.000575613,0.09285436,0.001310476,0.00013893934,0.0007422383,0.72336626,0.0007563081,0.0026314221,0.1102773,0.0041903164,0.06269775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031976114,0.00072146754,0.035494387,0.0018029388,0.0001436019,0.0006930931,0.74258095,0.0034780833,0.0029946663,0.10449995,0.10702336,0.00024767828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010267373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018327448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00979582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020138241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888923337","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401040","title":"On the citation advantage of tweeted papers at the journal level","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Political science; Information retrieval; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.2756307317455509,"score_gpt":0.47831595135518995,"score_spread":0.20268521960963903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888923337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904531,0.0018742735,0.0005803903,0.0007189742,0.00012461949,0.000008266729,0.00051395246,0.000028012028,0.0056984946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814904,0.0005396901,0.00017545077,0.000045102515,0.00016881546,0.0000050850635,0.00015578014,0.000009146483,0.0007518693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760073,0.0008070079,0.00022969124,0.00030681348,0.0007937065,0.0002621261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90063685,0.07299464,0.016112654,0.0022967767,0.005054866,0.0029042577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039286898,0.00033026858,0.0006636129,0.0058678943,0.0008162615,0.003557759,0.00039236515,0.00095192046,0.006292224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0545961,0.0001341428,0.0004867667,0.008804449,0.00069015496,0.0032365045,0.0014440618,0.0008725114,0.0011800791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002081747,0.00038701584,0.88198066,0.0007978154,0.00092910696,0.0005917211,0.002196357,0.0025401958,0.0095452275,0.004350505,0.0023412318,0.09225833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006626768,0.00055779336,0.97701854,0.00012303937,0.00065114896,0.0005574081,0.002584344,0.003632091,0.0048287245,0.004291761,0.0056148563,0.000074005104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011003279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011483069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99607134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054181117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036267945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02104956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889499003","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.180154","title":"How predatory journals leak into PubMed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Key (lock); Data science; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.3334433946008996,"score_gpt":0.49615533824865493,"score_spread":0.16271194364775532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889499003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022217888,0.06606442,0.015657235,0.782558,0.021604922,0.0006766502,0.011942135,0.004988086,0.07429064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27174798,0.11208199,0.049060263,0.41969675,0.04620954,0.00091574766,0.01748231,0.010269982,0.072535545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8460042,0.03480405,0.020917816,0.010276872,0.08453272,0.0034642743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3830602,0.31384683,0.124765515,0.050312523,0.11318706,0.014827895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061268244,0.001184826,0.0019972657,0.03533729,0.0059695058,0.031602975,0.003480858,0.007807186,0.053547915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5102728,0.0017045975,0.0017296333,0.042366613,0.008391929,0.043355763,0.013883866,0.006791698,0.029387992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039107128,0.0000667796,0.020949734,0.0061050598,0.00046859594,0.0015391817,0.008554732,0.00024007284,0.000946662,0.03885384,0.7222002,0.19968411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089139285,0.0000958541,0.009234953,0.012457019,0.00040430352,0.0033644955,0.007307191,0.0007504401,0.0012700174,0.057245154,0.9075545,0.0002268638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052576293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073199817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006529638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014105216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32402128},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2891139263","doi":"10.1108/ajim-02-2018-0023","title":"The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; China; Web of science; Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Scale (ratio); Publishing; Library science; Bibliometrics; Political science; Business; Geography; MEDLINE; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.3792237862291387,"score_gpt":0.5586849296211596,"score_spread":0.17946114339202085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891139263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260417,0.030862961,0.00281705,0.0035574054,0.00019189107,0.00013085121,0.012343689,0.00012276882,0.023931576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917448,0.0035954271,0.0012317926,0.00017734624,0.000081146034,0.00004099359,0.0023029721,0.000034774752,0.0007907402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880262,0.00248893,0.0029577783,0.0019028152,0.003624053,0.0010003215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88423765,0.042547077,0.045232315,0.006041217,0.01788917,0.004052618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01147843,0.00024879424,0.0007008607,0.029987218,0.00074095884,0.0054868334,0.0007263027,0.0005885039,0.0036421276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060819086,0.00023471068,0.00088645885,0.045727577,0.0019296721,0.004877507,0.0035529684,0.0007868112,0.00064082065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023866343,0.000049519676,0.8801216,0.0023669132,0.00060722645,0.00047922248,0.004241259,0.00059778034,0.0006518243,0.012518858,0.0038404602,0.09428673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011239016,0.000111039946,0.9611945,0.0015832119,0.00031567155,0.0007371051,0.008582589,0.0007394588,0.000949482,0.0025346123,0.023190906,0.000050170052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004920299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017989795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022018128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06070441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891257676","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.8801","title":"8. Le transfert des connaissances au CRDITED de Montréal","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.1954363911221218,"score_gpt":0.35558859408030685,"score_spread":0.16015220295818505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891257676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011316548,0.019714141,0.0015412404,0.019496385,0.001324201,0.00014205399,0.002674706,0.0002681222,0.94352263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049786095,0.005659877,0.0016748771,0.0010249079,0.00013528926,0.00006371541,0.0006674341,0.00009894755,0.94088894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984665,0.00011182473,0.00005304939,0.00026575435,0.00076092687,0.00034193284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887973,0.00014462901,0.00007603844,0.00006753145,0.0006248161,0.00020728099],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090364093,0.00064745225,0.0002777782,0.0035204666,0.004819529,0.0065374407,0.0014560762,0.0013961683,0.06892696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002456186,0.00048496187,0.0004503158,0.006782787,0.0024278054,0.0019095996,0.0019866999,0.001582461,0.00591945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250661,0.00003387237,0.004346561,0.0005696008,0.00002207529,0.0005798467,0.009645168,0.00038407813,0.0014864601,0.3102599,0.43432224,0.23828775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000521818,0.0000082923,0.008435719,0.00012462761,0.0000058357414,0.00006799578,0.0006311822,0.0000814494,0.0003347436,0.0012335752,0.9890537,0.000017678718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9737453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99346256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06508893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041733854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4722554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891358922","doi":"","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Library science; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; English language; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.8790385872218804,"score_gpt":0.7668242092888382,"score_spread":0.11221437793304223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891358922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79912305,0.032007374,0.012740303,0.002077478,0.00037687158,0.0020969142,0.058621634,0.00089190144,0.09206458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295604,0.018148586,0.018013373,0.00013130295,0.0005544502,0.0016733976,0.02754679,0.00014971576,0.004221945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727563,0.003940998,0.0046107667,0.0011696949,0.016710483,0.0008116841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148934,0.050112225,0.014821674,0.00222604,0.016561909,0.0013848606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012927042,0.00091353286,0.002538177,0.29230022,0.0022845285,0.007032896,0.0012656883,0.00068484654,0.005694481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0822929,0.0003665043,0.0023565937,0.33699542,0.0012488508,0.0056879423,0.0033928698,0.0005319012,0.001422319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061406486,0.00053361617,0.3936002,0.019480225,0.0029487147,0.0014167666,0.010221096,0.0042568957,0.0033771317,0.016650578,0.024257593,0.5226431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113772905,0.0007494025,0.8764651,0.004098099,0.0020927098,0.002408343,0.023192648,0.012021491,0.0028503076,0.010128678,0.06561618,0.00026318146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072955186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036993502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068365514},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2893220905","doi":"10.5958/0976-2469.2018.00031.3","title":"Leishmaniasis: Scientometric assessment of global research output","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Herald","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leishmaniasis; Veterinary medicine; Engineering; Mathematics; Toxicology; Biotechnology; Biology; Medicine; Immunology","score_opus":0.696879119625453,"score_gpt":0.6461404453737221,"score_spread":0.05073867425173095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893220905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8370777,0.014789563,0.006875284,0.0024753443,0.00031486995,0.00046322096,0.0584286,0.0011910899,0.078384385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697697,0.0043796897,0.004131764,0.000058674388,0.0002839015,0.00023354456,0.018739298,0.00007692255,0.0023264918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930046,0.0013192616,0.0010402912,0.00050952006,0.003757607,0.00036873133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98350483,0.0064348243,0.0041770157,0.0012343602,0.0039621536,0.00068686967],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006222179,0.0006662326,0.000986738,0.09156566,0.0007722533,0.0045835073,0.0005135503,0.00046657378,0.0038449832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0252868,0.00016435461,0.0017178735,0.12624489,0.0006615669,0.0029018784,0.0022209394,0.00042507684,0.0011511995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017167987,0.00011097866,0.81001395,0.0024225814,0.00117709,0.00027539654,0.0021704587,0.002842089,0.0008549297,0.004443738,0.011449098,0.16406803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014746483,0.00014995952,0.9585758,0.0002581427,0.0002726221,0.00050090614,0.0034869844,0.004236844,0.0006902755,0.0025658673,0.029198,0.00004989861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004152352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037637204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90843433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015289554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022096743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032906413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894658923","doi":"10.15273/pnsis.v43i2.3643","title":"THE NOVA SCOTIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: STUDENT SCIENCE AWARDS 2004","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.23757522911964377,"score_gpt":0.49037568914838203,"score_spread":0.25280046002873824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894658923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10497018,0.016060453,0.0019422269,0.22815877,0.076423086,0.0018141315,0.050084073,0.001527065,0.51901996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117153764,0.0035512852,0.0019428561,0.0059663653,0.0013864446,0.00022065103,0.009513449,0.00016729032,0.8600979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607134,0.00022568925,0.00019410686,0.00015909811,0.0020565523,0.00129312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97334033,0.00084415666,0.0005929079,0.0008258453,0.011702716,0.012694041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037831117,0.00069857785,0.0008791483,0.0024752603,0.0035385066,0.005073356,0.001209274,0.0028241016,0.04745229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011344925,0.00045709495,0.00034544515,0.003459259,0.0008494864,0.0008976339,0.0031710619,0.0025721914,0.017097605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005706644,0.000075988435,0.007092811,0.00012677615,0.000024843459,0.00048948656,0.00026327316,0.0002021988,0.0010086298,0.005568037,0.9452336,0.039343763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012276733,0.000055267275,0.06589994,0.00008893571,0.000014177995,0.0000996273,0.0004001842,0.0004284482,0.00036958556,0.0004898822,0.9320002,0.000030944146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67673343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8918171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32326657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02394566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08517529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6503407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895416954","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.16493.1","title":"The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":344,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Syracuse University; Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Publication; Scholarship; Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Prestige; Scholarly communication; Institution; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Altmetrics; Publish or perish; Open science; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7905803533225655,"score_gpt":0.6613001445891282,"score_spread":0.12928020873343726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895416954","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020581024,0.72864544,0.0050308877,0.21618003,0.007681429,0.00045248505,0.0003273341,0.00016914953,0.020932257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45760968,0.44769043,0.030817533,0.041992746,0.012575558,0.0014035495,0.00076221325,0.00034755547,0.006800683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.65816647,0.21174328,0.04536297,0.00915148,0.06884608,0.00672978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20141213,0.35140324,0.09332676,0.020434136,0.30843952,0.02498428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.44097206,0.00082803454,0.0031320653,0.018145213,0.0040260367,0.02797298,0.0037929025,0.0055416464,0.004084121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5777349,0.001006181,0.0018462507,0.024698505,0.010560125,0.023322448,0.0077072894,0.004081482,0.0012030099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003477177,0.00022446575,0.025816726,0.02248981,0.0005865784,0.00010141972,0.011995271,0.00031627133,0.00053755665,0.027417887,0.030684348,0.87948185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025175215,0.0018991918,0.12408636,0.16544583,0.0022576614,0.00091212936,0.038782436,0.0027917933,0.0027149408,0.047356714,0.612768,0.0007331931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011041273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019521521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02739767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05636579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.689381},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2895831373","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.06","title":"Dynamics of Journal Impact Factors and Limits to Their Inflation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Statistics; Dynamics (music); Econometrics; Extrapolation; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.447630236235392,"score_gpt":0.5249796450590765,"score_spread":0.07734940882368446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895831373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276161,0.0030849623,0.04265119,0.0022105188,0.000060762755,0.00007383893,0.00089101586,0.00051855826,0.022893103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593794,0.00032291442,0.002638707,0.000041819265,0.000050293696,0.000029147315,0.00023426165,0.000034857032,0.00071003445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428964,0.0011124534,0.00048892363,0.0014160593,0.0019190662,0.00077377574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9300208,0.04380424,0.01348407,0.005450468,0.0057158074,0.0015246832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008550946,0.00040478987,0.00102811,0.0051178965,0.00079431816,0.006263399,0.0009302283,0.0012838049,0.0017825756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10070983,0.00073851657,0.0011065934,0.0043273456,0.0022111065,0.004601237,0.0016048881,0.0015998138,0.0006535872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005270284,0.00021491376,0.53745496,0.0005017572,0.0004630743,0.00073287485,0.0044127195,0.06355484,0.0047326754,0.24523036,0.004337852,0.13783698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041144307,0.00024829645,0.60151684,0.00018918712,0.000087684326,0.0010686632,0.0018134176,0.15513858,0.0018763047,0.227426,0.010376669,0.0002172521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005413561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016781746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027248776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015954784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045222223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896024286","doi":"10.1504/ijtm.2019.10016976","title":"Citation impact of public and private funding on nanotechnology-related publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Public funding; Citation impact; Economics; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.3907934107378278,"score_gpt":0.5537485753717843,"score_spread":0.16295516463395654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896024286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781367,0.004308086,0.0019955954,0.001722196,0.00011195989,0.000023707593,0.00092945475,0.00007553388,0.012696801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556005,0.0008862926,0.00028373222,0.000036198046,0.00020476733,0.000020945788,0.00037481028,0.000010347461,0.002622832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934001,0.002893147,0.0005109073,0.0004443058,0.0020554839,0.00069614913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84499717,0.117395855,0.022822669,0.0035257533,0.008772835,0.0024857984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884664,0.0002850145,0.0010779281,0.004197894,0.00039767477,0.002332103,0.0005258439,0.0008717938,0.0064085773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072601765,0.00011740891,0.0008926462,0.006299807,0.0007803674,0.0017364233,0.0012421204,0.0010578593,0.0007542953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020610876,0.001022548,0.69523257,0.0013558024,0.0017625113,0.0005859963,0.0014453157,0.040349223,0.0043937694,0.04240155,0.0050753863,0.20431428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017610114,0.001276419,0.9136061,0.00028273635,0.0015840097,0.00042950746,0.001383362,0.0275973,0.007547953,0.027522046,0.018486422,0.00010800272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022412552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002174576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017558694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020543993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04678607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896552281","doi":"10.3390/publications6040041","title":"Planning for Academic Publishing after Retirement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Publishing; Publication; Research Assessment Exercise; Public relations; Mandatory retirement; Political science; Labour economics; Management; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Higher education; Computer science","score_opus":0.8246445626788835,"score_gpt":0.6557962135259534,"score_spread":0.16884834915293012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896552281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03363344,0.016996616,0.01185973,0.672228,0.034635734,0.00136476,0.0008233858,0.00220167,0.22625667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2541439,0.022524346,0.06063643,0.15489893,0.035069954,0.0039857617,0.0028082237,0.0014089118,0.4645235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743479,0.008520331,0.0019412667,0.0018987312,0.006704083,0.006587742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76755565,0.037653845,0.012442638,0.009020267,0.03288196,0.14044562],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047727514,0.00065549795,0.0009806611,0.004079333,0.0106957005,0.029209146,0.0046513425,0.013737539,0.09169914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14669007,0.00097413943,0.0016971714,0.0042783422,0.0031722018,0.02260896,0.011338663,0.011038066,0.052929565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020604888,0.00042537865,0.0051240926,0.00065408985,0.0000435438,0.00148715,0.004640634,0.00041104914,0.0006644391,0.03733018,0.75471085,0.19430253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000934316,0.00018770095,0.004184671,0.00047793408,0.000022245007,0.00036095417,0.008013165,0.00018747052,0.0003774526,0.020806264,0.96522194,0.00006679038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044804015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010152829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97079086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070416224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057956133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3067642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896781104","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-52-69","title":"Transactions in science in comparative perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Perspective (graphical); Database transaction; Transactional leadership; Productivity; Academic freedom; Transactional analysis; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Public relations; Higher education; Law; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.6674340443599226,"score_gpt":0.6255319469027476,"score_spread":0.04190209745717499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896781104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034847293,0.04820832,0.12686871,0.020785976,0.0016004993,0.00016519039,0.00044127018,0.00010874669,0.76697403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901599,0.03054489,0.034667782,0.0018220327,0.002362777,0.00052339194,0.00041664945,0.00007745932,0.027985876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495137,0.0031774691,0.00027796262,0.00050999125,0.0007935268,0.00028967726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938186,0.0042166407,0.00050997635,0.0006148826,0.0005851069,0.00025471684],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004038841,0.00070421334,0.0009412249,0.0054355725,0.0021880632,0.008702198,0.0010505074,0.0023056066,0.018065304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007095582,0.0002711647,0.00067212095,0.007520558,0.012435714,0.011276787,0.003287547,0.0023645589,0.0011817844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044116696,0.000004861615,0.00014984721,0.00005158997,0.0000063548705,0.00004953029,0.00033714212,0.000278493,0.000046994126,0.995236,0.00042074735,0.0034141028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082234965,0.000028778803,0.00053762755,0.000114062736,0.000011789416,0.00019602328,0.0011104078,0.0009073992,0.00008504471,0.93692416,0.0600663,0.000010092776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021962684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014361037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005308921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019068868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06043446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897215433","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.08","title":"Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Publishing; Enthusiasm; Scholarly communication; Perception; Social media; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.758141670926953,"score_gpt":0.6392867207315888,"score_spread":0.11885495019536418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897215433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896606,0.0010810033,0.00043498157,0.0017800073,0.00007824544,0.000029667906,0.0000664146,0.000011606125,0.006857561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597365,0.00094541116,0.00029048335,0.00028552744,0.00012895666,0.000017816386,0.000058833535,0.000011432834,0.0022879485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269485,0.003143867,0.00045986913,0.0004538172,0.002798174,0.00044935936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93551296,0.03250521,0.0133593995,0.0018575419,0.010209283,0.006555568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01239616,0.0002239393,0.000471847,0.002883079,0.001378064,0.004461362,0.0004457429,0.0010993769,0.0027155883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056665663,0.00021824999,0.0002345353,0.0020395992,0.0016135835,0.0020875372,0.0018742487,0.0008982658,0.0004361722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042266352,0.00033248655,0.6875975,0.00056575186,0.0001455101,0.0016720335,0.21562095,0.00021212398,0.0030286547,0.0032520606,0.003763805,0.0833864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054971184,0.00042046397,0.70315194,0.00057997584,0.00011518581,0.002304149,0.23835844,0.0009117698,0.0010005379,0.0025812385,0.05037546,0.00014593868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028655885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00285909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011322362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011956863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0655579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897574271","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2018.00115","title":"Enhancing Climate Change Research With Open Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Front (military); Environmental science; Climate science; Environmental resource management; Climatology; Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.5067970912365414,"score_gpt":0.556646742907669,"score_spread":0.04984965167112765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897574271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086660385,0.005762389,0.02188114,0.09960555,0.010264318,0.00030438718,0.009665907,0.0037664555,0.8400839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5587444,0.028729083,0.13916753,0.022737568,0.012791138,0.0011433946,0.025964987,0.0055349115,0.20518704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940665,0.0023901316,0.00028732815,0.0006116814,0.0020340416,0.00061021606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762161,0.008137115,0.0013550216,0.0037978846,0.007152823,0.00334106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009093773,0.00047300544,0.0004481421,0.0056987214,0.0014806604,0.00960662,0.0012020727,0.0021559536,0.14131661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04828399,0.00026649082,0.00094809633,0.010332383,0.0016295725,0.013776234,0.0068572285,0.0022734185,0.027879916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017468132,0.000111649744,0.0026992457,0.0010829233,0.00004814505,0.00015407016,0.00085462205,0.001369023,0.00088735914,0.14402643,0.57323486,0.27535692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008282431,0.000030330344,0.0053583104,0.0005370573,0.000027495524,0.00006222089,0.0006069162,0.0009081233,0.0007315663,0.07930893,0.9123274,0.000018890207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005188502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010388859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99879795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027439361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050892974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47275114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898324775","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w","title":"Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Free access; Scale (ratio); Open access journal; Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Physics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8984324794612757,"score_gpt":0.7476529375393673,"score_spread":0.15077954192190834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898324775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4201608,0.009399056,0.01948968,0.3363933,0.0046197767,0.0008761851,0.003005746,0.0006629197,0.20539251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538457,0.0023868617,0.0050832625,0.024995193,0.0017507684,0.00061407284,0.0010507908,0.00027240274,0.010000968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7289015,0.10930777,0.036104474,0.01591096,0.08198335,0.02779194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25387245,0.38761503,0.17387663,0.09215375,0.067403264,0.025078837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23566018,0.0004609481,0.001656682,0.0070445766,0.006059282,0.027290741,0.0036769363,0.009387241,0.009663159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6219307,0.0012723149,0.0009289529,0.013569361,0.012869979,0.020080306,0.014056158,0.0054159826,0.003227848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015244012,0.0003752087,0.40425664,0.0013036707,0.00067497225,0.0012603656,0.026417851,0.0015045594,0.0023540151,0.25259137,0.105136506,0.20260045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085246994,0.0003673529,0.24058017,0.0018223177,0.00039563916,0.0007232969,0.028798116,0.0031753883,0.004504782,0.3908992,0.32732022,0.0005611351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011364656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012137618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99632305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008688675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03263121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94256705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898390052","doi":"","title":"The state and evolution of Gold Open Access: A country level analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Repository (Leiden University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Quarter (Canadian coin); China; Demography; Geography; MEDLINE; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.41322115289683276,"score_gpt":0.5040019364291944,"score_spread":0.09078078353236169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898390052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660216,0.0057034716,0.0010432951,0.0007408089,0.000035595807,0.000037839323,0.014035511,0.00009367752,0.012288199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913483,0.00127955,0.0006657654,0.00006534838,0.000030617422,0.000023906188,0.005804636,0.000034694644,0.0007472174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951256,0.0008657487,0.000965841,0.00079031003,0.0015846204,0.00066787034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92982763,0.022102797,0.02877609,0.0040727244,0.013028896,0.0021917943],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005377065,0.00020327902,0.00067353033,0.025831781,0.00051451795,0.0035853141,0.0005846828,0.00042943767,0.002051299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032437544,0.00021108604,0.00095548294,0.039783865,0.0010528513,0.0032112827,0.0021782783,0.00063727866,0.0005737815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015444237,0.000032970038,0.96292007,0.0004137547,0.00044415164,0.00024656698,0.0010844814,0.00077646365,0.0007582302,0.0025243305,0.001975738,0.02866882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050515396,0.00004119152,0.99023145,0.000119708566,0.00014967653,0.00018634032,0.0012595984,0.0006731762,0.00061664666,0.00027431213,0.0064252163,0.000017626446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012825766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011982818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99941534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011508288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001055669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028437018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898503602","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2018.09.001","title":"Indicateurs de notoriété des revues scientifiques, des chercheurs et des articles publiés en santé : perspective pharmaceutique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.7309520116639525,"score_gpt":0.6519574842562337,"score_spread":0.07899452740771884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898503602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005933688,0.99561346,0.00015819348,0.0023883372,0.0003243809,0.000008595103,0.0002144029,0.000008913244,0.00069040747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0147706345,0.9818003,0.00072710466,0.001009573,0.0010112332,0.000045927616,0.00023511586,0.000008903899,0.0003912259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749112,0.008009433,0.0045155566,0.0027211693,0.009100869,0.0007418137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85586685,0.10839235,0.015126777,0.0016865475,0.017602911,0.001324611],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03710454,0.0014589055,0.005104248,0.031936947,0.00091455353,0.009471938,0.0018930293,0.003921378,0.006617643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09980267,0.00094229047,0.0038190973,0.042062823,0.0027090567,0.007761429,0.0018244444,0.0029865112,0.001514803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006334563,0.000095981595,0.010388761,0.20545737,0.007248856,0.0002348608,0.0010410084,0.00046775895,0.00092719053,0.015563411,0.026699344,0.73124194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005021863,0.0005614407,0.098882414,0.22735873,0.02896914,0.0027880792,0.003470818,0.0006391341,0.0029200655,0.017568732,0.61600053,0.00033882092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010059023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015147528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96806306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071271765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019833086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19622988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899013035","doi":"10.1002/leap.1206","title":"Sci‐Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; China; Headway; Quarter (Canadian coin); Desk; Promotion (chess); Political science; Engineering; Business; Psychology; Geography; Law; Transport engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5303255250196891,"score_gpt":0.5402152958563844,"score_spread":0.009889770836695289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899013035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12565617,0.01990464,0.0036742454,0.63892776,0.006188608,0.000045406065,0.00076207315,0.0005589006,0.20428221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789959,0.022693088,0.0016332379,0.08069515,0.0066663306,0.00006265392,0.00068651896,0.00046519624,0.09713876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476033,0.0015336099,0.00018586994,0.00044261172,0.0019766297,0.0011009758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98436445,0.004314138,0.001141735,0.0013450782,0.0029942957,0.0058402526],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010996621,0.00046141402,0.0006147935,0.0055421065,0.009079287,0.02729619,0.0011677119,0.0042649284,0.01339067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015055656,0.0003190831,0.00064636837,0.009550487,0.011828767,0.020476663,0.007879305,0.0069423914,0.003585261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003286267,0.00011635642,0.020023344,0.00043472488,0.000057090143,0.0012023197,0.06869988,0.00019388642,0.0010367333,0.42313835,0.34656572,0.13820295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010471254,0.00008632634,0.008171467,0.00027903554,0.00002134242,0.00040286558,0.042001043,0.00018521895,0.0006394659,0.020343952,0.9278086,0.000050111976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009291607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010574878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076763174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008043655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05815643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899425819","doi":"10.1192/bja.2018.56","title":"Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BJPsych Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Directory; Revenue; Internet privacy; Declaration; Reading (process); Advertising; World Wide Web; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.46919279975365585,"score_gpt":0.5673250366612027,"score_spread":0.09813223690754685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899425819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105290174,0.013994527,0.021894809,0.74698836,0.010031706,0.00029614902,0.00011371043,0.001296418,0.10009417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74321175,0.010306886,0.03471652,0.15288249,0.0062528495,0.00046225617,0.00016373726,0.0008740948,0.051129375],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96760476,0.015778871,0.0020747255,0.0022210295,0.010732707,0.001587828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8158134,0.09131009,0.027555333,0.01219513,0.028343849,0.024782198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033545196,0.00073122076,0.0013213973,0.0034301467,0.012623511,0.022796614,0.0027350972,0.008047092,0.01369932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1746122,0.0008841968,0.0006965714,0.0019246708,0.016535526,0.028154658,0.010257152,0.008085978,0.008465368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028524327,0.00038703173,0.05288355,0.001507323,0.00025237218,0.0023652944,0.07409978,0.00021666581,0.0020641978,0.07599719,0.37506932,0.41487202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001246136,0.000497804,0.020429116,0.0026381768,0.00021485228,0.005619958,0.09248732,0.00081613736,0.0027952185,0.13374846,0.7402586,0.00036972176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024760845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004009362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031677762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006011622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17740607},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2899440325","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1191","title":"Tread Carefully: Managing Identities and Expectations in High-Tech Industry–Academia Collaborations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"FedDev Ontario","keywords":"Commercialization; Tread; Open innovation; Work (physics); High tech; Business; Key (lock); Marketing; Engineering; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3813168633560889,"score_gpt":0.5538592302944852,"score_spread":0.17254236693839636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899440325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7323208,0.002919406,0.045105945,0.0741026,0.0006033337,0.0002443414,0.00017621572,0.0002848092,0.14424257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213725,0.0003306168,0.0036491167,0.0012408036,0.00007018391,0.00008231092,0.00006386772,0.000026412303,0.0023993547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96488833,0.026546063,0.0008517467,0.0015354677,0.004025952,0.002152472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87556,0.06795051,0.020019634,0.004596568,0.010761398,0.021111934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033261243,0.0003938394,0.00045589288,0.0027210563,0.014911883,0.020548863,0.0022261452,0.0037033574,0.008181337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09900664,0.0004654362,0.0004044377,0.0025816541,0.007059636,0.017749596,0.014615891,0.0039276057,0.0016323817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052814983,0.00060639885,0.14897713,0.0005107944,0.00010416325,0.0015008228,0.39661333,0.001736632,0.0016587045,0.15492554,0.031973794,0.26086465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008489634,0.0002881702,0.04405566,0.00078776246,0.000084777974,0.00074056914,0.52377105,0.008813431,0.0012533931,0.2915513,0.12835866,0.00021026019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054202457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070079947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01658858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17590433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899615849","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Citation Management Tools: EndNote X7 & EndNote Basic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7038710499497854,"score_gpt":0.571306249908074,"score_spread":0.13256480004171145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899615849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034498964,0.0014093588,0.031209514,0.0023310108,0.0023193958,0.0012562299,0.36403292,0.081634775,0.5123569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007294639,0.002558599,0.08352865,0.0006473107,0.0006149598,0.0025424457,0.25085834,0.035626903,0.6163282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974915,0.00044288847,0.0003750088,0.00024678776,0.0012198853,0.00022395085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820274,0.005089747,0.00096209487,0.0027718483,0.008221061,0.0009279076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051538674,0.0013223119,0.0012963747,0.018026916,0.0027014473,0.006419775,0.002528392,0.0011010021,0.5681938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021993605,0.0018926986,0.00068961055,0.03641026,0.00088438636,0.004967541,0.0026411253,0.0022265606,0.39990947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042727108,0.000026544923,0.00020643961,0.00044341013,0.0000057070997,0.000022472379,0.00034533,0.00004220106,0.00045611322,0.0025385022,0.947553,0.048317533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020618374,0.000008300298,0.001373271,0.00021108423,0.0000066219186,0.00003337672,0.0002082813,0.00007384153,0.000828892,0.001493534,0.9957231,0.000019038534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024248531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06510308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5681938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002260099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009719471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6159191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899788429","doi":"10.18352/lq.10252","title":"A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Health and Medical Research Fund; National Health and Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Medical Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Scopus; Publication; Open access journal; Compliance (psychology); Free access; Citation; Open science; Open data; Political science; Impact factor; Library science; Psychology; MEDLINE; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.4799997742312179,"score_gpt":0.5410362984218704,"score_spread":0.061036524190652475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899788429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571509,0.003764238,0.0005228839,0.006189795,0.00017285276,0.00016984413,0.005114096,0.00007293238,0.026842523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949858,0.0006841968,0.00041538727,0.00042541474,0.000086469096,0.00006513325,0.0011582861,0.00003775751,0.0021416673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94073325,0.012537272,0.01261893,0.0053509725,0.022213388,0.006546128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45567867,0.19761747,0.2380836,0.03442501,0.054850023,0.019345218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033652592,0.0003233668,0.0010523775,0.01264118,0.0046251784,0.008788571,0.0024086297,0.0016011281,0.011761155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3166279,0.00048781317,0.000769558,0.03487981,0.0039286804,0.005347632,0.0049350387,0.0018225359,0.0011761267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008952763,0.00012002599,0.923933,0.00078203203,0.00041806133,0.00076540024,0.016010348,0.0001927477,0.0007637043,0.005935521,0.015629405,0.034554396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025460817,0.000060341692,0.96741706,0.00036267217,0.000112270274,0.0004455602,0.0103186555,0.00029060716,0.0004185972,0.0016548027,0.018814586,0.00007945932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13365607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14997634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006247342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015203357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26575625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899927427","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1330","title":"The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Peer review; Information retrieval; Scrutiny; Inclusion (mineral); Computer science; Technical peer review; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.7743918792844233,"score_gpt":0.7358830040339657,"score_spread":0.03850887525045765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899927427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23707734,0.33483106,0.11171477,0.13493674,0.019191684,0.080864444,0.0034803536,0.0031526373,0.074751005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72190505,0.06322371,0.15470316,0.010572128,0.0070004268,0.036639616,0.0016741939,0.0010851052,0.0031965843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.06261931,0.70761424,0.1079239,0.0068690744,0.11235047,0.0026230984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.012321052,0.79733336,0.07318713,0.025529917,0.0895419,0.0020866038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.753985,0.0026900596,0.0056366012,0.03023865,0.0049102637,0.025892839,0.008296281,0.0053807255,0.0054496857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.95166004,0.0031788507,0.0047012963,0.02801892,0.0072475323,0.019550396,0.0136093665,0.0053531434,0.0024864457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004335202,0.0007502374,0.032136936,0.16629101,0.0051099816,0.001303159,0.047813788,0.0019845823,0.003702185,0.008643188,0.024905512,0.70302415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072332,0.0119184945,0.1337672,0.30478856,0.017825495,0.0075758332,0.064511575,0.014858356,0.014056181,0.025328321,0.39596668,0.0021702063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034698017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012313648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049421776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30338037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900375034","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.12.006","title":"Response to Editorial commentary: predatory publishing or a lack of peer-review transparency?—a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in pediatric urology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Pediatric urology; Surgery; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5242213990346142,"score_gpt":0.5855189189213322,"score_spread":0.061297519886718055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900375034","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023810186,0.0016041021,0.00013539517,0.3449921,0.6518258,0.0000393413,0.00017579265,0.00006956922,0.0009197862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021707823,0.0014057931,0.00026817573,0.15702803,0.83586395,0.000054737044,0.00006539225,0.000078715726,0.0030643707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98042804,0.0030428877,0.004284263,0.0021002963,0.00868216,0.0014623727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8427325,0.05608572,0.014174295,0.0037057512,0.06620869,0.017093034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022464864,0.0026285732,0.0046519893,0.0077764,0.005868848,0.0121056475,0.0058951364,0.031835936,0.008392318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14209734,0.001557255,0.0024466026,0.005078406,0.004373981,0.0051155877,0.0026495392,0.026904382,0.006102202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003259957,0.000016404214,0.0002668253,0.00016450942,0.000024864199,0.00027423218,0.00005278646,0.0000149571615,0.000038396083,0.00021938197,0.996467,0.0024280706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021994708,0.00008022456,0.0034976276,0.0019242936,0.00024057605,0.0019577756,0.00093501445,0.0006873029,0.00033043642,0.0020601603,0.9879354,0.0001312067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036978724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009471829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006441879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009882799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11880696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900535746","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006508","title":"Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Vetenskapsrådet; Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4790088796465932,"score_gpt":0.5781260711431757,"score_spread":0.09911719149658249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900535746","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02092222,0.0021639962,0.80030364,0.027704263,0.0070656547,0.012420406,0.00051977707,0.004914031,0.12398604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05060008,0.00073683576,0.9229208,0.002283753,0.0005455334,0.005472955,0.00039776764,0.0006130433,0.016429268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6489079,0.16591105,0.08666287,0.02031184,0.07113661,0.00706969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5021463,0.23815589,0.047548234,0.06732415,0.12230147,0.022523984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1728315,0.0027498351,0.0012267336,0.0076054055,0.010169936,0.02623547,0.007878443,0.009337444,0.0069581033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31215748,0.0025483356,0.0025931983,0.00432523,0.02492823,0.015336886,0.0125438385,0.011216149,0.012357528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033111038,0.0005391462,0.01261289,0.0035837898,0.00016094076,0.0019962988,0.05008062,0.0049147066,0.0070542768,0.47020602,0.119981416,0.32853878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022387365,0.00034090655,0.004308396,0.0054423097,0.00013614191,0.0027562887,0.01344698,0.010680955,0.007518062,0.23427683,0.7200895,0.0007797663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00396798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075138127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82716846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009241631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02542504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91403127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900654612","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.17.01569","title":"Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Directory; Citation; Library science; Publication; Web of science; Computer science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Advertising; Business; Law","score_opus":0.7911432833073164,"score_gpt":0.5825953285053198,"score_spread":0.20854795480199662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900654612","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21961501,0.5363646,0.012010866,0.11672728,0.006989198,0.00081680634,0.0010774485,0.000439705,0.10595902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8072971,0.14251998,0.012676973,0.016463833,0.0114577655,0.0004591039,0.000650151,0.00027344568,0.008201685],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8980856,0.042609714,0.014580642,0.008293932,0.0342861,0.0021440021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3435103,0.41771358,0.1837031,0.018999226,0.026702903,0.009370833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046438474,0.00053607655,0.001201858,0.021010034,0.004673639,0.015402951,0.0025769374,0.004039516,0.012325624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24290428,0.0008784918,0.000827919,0.031873684,0.012987204,0.010755214,0.008566746,0.0027416185,0.0024641214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492565,0.00025973088,0.30004314,0.023604808,0.000540936,0.008562084,0.042598903,0.00049141236,0.0010419141,0.091100834,0.056721855,0.47454184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015730268,0.0006464829,0.21985874,0.03267831,0.0006042711,0.048508808,0.03080181,0.0014023164,0.0020143713,0.106812224,0.5562118,0.00030355563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003128732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004061491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005736939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011403675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24559301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900762555","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3279254","title":"Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Industrial organization; Electricity; Profit (economics); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Business; Economics; Marketing; Engineering; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.42654730451647505,"score_gpt":0.5061243563753214,"score_spread":0.07957705185884634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900762555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754615,0.003244121,0.0049313433,0.0010889039,0.00008697604,0.000035797948,0.0020719904,0.0000563155,0.01302303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962288,0.0006221307,0.00090051984,0.00005657025,0.00010416229,0.000030712625,0.00075052015,0.000009667863,0.0012970243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948933,0.0016256231,0.0004574985,0.0009272707,0.0016434715,0.0004528618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518911,0.02410551,0.014819905,0.0018266183,0.0050667734,0.0022901597],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006445567,0.00046949158,0.0008095136,0.0064111617,0.0006731546,0.0040962356,0.00073514605,0.0013037446,0.0021779754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032749854,0.00017819296,0.0009478137,0.011872964,0.00079420954,0.0041082376,0.0017512543,0.0012722851,0.00072206836],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001830289,0.00032169663,0.93889815,0.00019946863,0.0010819859,0.000084621985,0.0002930383,0.010941192,0.00072227354,0.0038142574,0.0010240901,0.04243619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026317473,0.0009365426,0.96379703,0.00012466345,0.0007723117,0.00016213687,0.00087074324,0.017018337,0.0016116196,0.010238476,0.0043712524,0.0000704923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005801812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008429434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99358886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021243547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024521693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034087837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901549057","doi":"10.1007/s12630-018-1254-4","title":"Focus on Peer Review: An Online Peer Review Course by Nature Masterclasses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Course (navigation); Peer review; Peer-to-peer; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.21409210013604407,"score_gpt":0.45468156684018585,"score_spread":0.24058946670414177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901549057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083326265,0.006671529,0.02338489,0.3447799,0.09054498,0.00282354,0.0013596236,0.0035722908,0.4435371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098960474,0.00397952,0.027586708,0.027498093,0.024997175,0.0016376141,0.0011630288,0.0011035673,0.8130738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993913,0.0010577156,0.00031236655,0.0006114554,0.0033568768,0.00074857415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94163656,0.004889522,0.0028048295,0.0028800871,0.012302748,0.035486173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012153351,0.00082499767,0.00093317375,0.0019607681,0.004280088,0.005695394,0.0019184868,0.0035577896,0.11045382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025564086,0.0007041768,0.00058320706,0.0010737793,0.0013950744,0.0034916042,0.005954283,0.0034142488,0.05701933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792139,0.0006923343,0.0020616385,0.000115253715,0.000008706127,0.0002913894,0.0004618019,0.00011004846,0.0022289993,0.0020000648,0.87045395,0.121487975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009295962,0.00033139752,0.022028329,0.00020488336,0.000011429317,0.0005192833,0.0014334284,0.0006732637,0.0013473938,0.01021026,0.9630976,0.000049833587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010197588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012346417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014718646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3695048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901669045","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/vdu7j","title":"Science, technology and innovation policies in Latin-America: fifteen years of scientific output, impact and international collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; State (computer science); Economic growth; Regional science; Economy; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.36098164767979657,"score_gpt":0.5699061880383827,"score_spread":0.2089245403585861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901669045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848453,0.0047604768,0.00013094633,0.001151115,0.0000135570035,0.000011317269,0.0008671982,0.000008782576,0.0082113715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954792,0.002890298,0.0001401047,0.00006664681,0.000022344695,0.00001568517,0.0008295623,0.0000032663447,0.00055286277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920374,0.00017305026,0.0001090298,0.00010740877,0.00019440593,0.0002124146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99035805,0.002061806,0.0052543394,0.00025691825,0.0012180879,0.0008506563],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029571548,0.00016503634,0.00032976392,0.0024995748,0.00066256576,0.002972851,0.00025475296,0.0003919596,0.0008269164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006585357,0.000114550654,0.00027932916,0.0061419066,0.00092890067,0.0015751041,0.0013423568,0.000605245,0.0000808991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015329184,0.00012444427,0.9632501,0.00019535645,0.00015452389,0.00017611119,0.0046001333,0.0011162392,0.00044491148,0.00540374,0.0008172431,0.02356389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007686332,0.00004969932,0.98707706,0.00012653702,0.000043189237,0.00004328783,0.0032731432,0.00025187843,0.00021851962,0.00061794114,0.008280161,0.000011022896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032480523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0292319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026953649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002900753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064582944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902067033","doi":"10.4033/iee.2018.11.10.c","title":"Eleven strategies for getting into graduate school in ecology &amp; evolutionary biology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Graduate students; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Biology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Political science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.35870779002070013,"score_gpt":0.5358896544351904,"score_spread":0.1771818644144903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902067033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08171893,0.00830683,0.13195471,0.48310834,0.005523598,0.008238185,0.0013234591,0.004383401,0.27544263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20313057,0.0117392205,0.5992527,0.027212907,0.0012278506,0.009451418,0.0020520762,0.0006242277,0.1453091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814073,0.0064672725,0.0023342876,0.0013697185,0.0056148516,0.0028066135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9259041,0.012431045,0.006974621,0.003426941,0.015065762,0.03619756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04539235,0.0016765217,0.0007849857,0.007995616,0.008966503,0.014143561,0.003915657,0.006606966,0.028345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055774465,0.0010756283,0.0014504478,0.00846085,0.0053258915,0.0065688035,0.013412156,0.007123506,0.024781402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016571164,0.0014044357,0.04228346,0.0011489665,0.000052155967,0.0002478533,0.005673032,0.0004650701,0.0009975504,0.04082927,0.18222816,0.7245043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044445967,0.0015653832,0.124385014,0.0041951276,0.00017939207,0.0015152064,0.037007555,0.0028834352,0.0038108977,0.11330394,0.71019626,0.00051330286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013281343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005740955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04539235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040681087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018226761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24006057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902198450","doi":"","title":"Mapping and Analyzing the Co-authorship and Thematic Networks of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences in the Science Citation Database from 2011-2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kurdistan University Of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Citation; Thematic map; Library science; Co-citation; Computer science; Citation database; Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Geography; Scopus; Political science; MEDLINE; Cartography","score_opus":0.4589085655805586,"score_gpt":0.48107154405116936,"score_spread":0.022162978470610772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902198450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403334,0.006789772,0.0019812214,0.0010657612,0.00008882644,0.00013708895,0.041148268,0.000109726396,0.0083460715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679258,0.0036335224,0.0037556705,0.000051370855,0.00006478321,0.00023859578,0.022973912,0.000022967675,0.0013335499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697423,0.00061189965,0.0007794028,0.0003716908,0.0009869122,0.0002758791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805666,0.0047365734,0.0029576805,0.00042224268,0.0034156642,0.00041111914],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031124183,0.00035250394,0.0004636746,0.031667255,0.0008698165,0.0019204096,0.0006018104,0.00038433826,0.0022247562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016384287,0.00012323454,0.0005395146,0.042407636,0.00028745612,0.001451218,0.0017078771,0.0002749156,0.00034823158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002899226,0.00009755348,0.780725,0.0051382664,0.0004950628,0.00094161095,0.0072245263,0.004825724,0.0012662516,0.004721929,0.015748989,0.1785252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000196074,0.00006959779,0.9191862,0.0010184058,0.00038758013,0.0010405174,0.0122918,0.005966653,0.001954335,0.0021128347,0.055869333,0.00008302015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011477585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009293715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96833277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017202114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030855602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022821546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902765992","doi":"","title":"Approaches to assessing impacts in the humanities and social sciences: recommendations from the Canadian research community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7863326952114063,"score_gpt":0.5765925590146029,"score_spread":0.20974013619680332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902765992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021582975,0.096089646,0.011591547,0.84451514,0.005295268,0.0010756195,0.0009802971,0.0005498612,0.037744295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12216,0.36336714,0.32050082,0.16518836,0.004354753,0.0056390096,0.0032036863,0.0008271766,0.014759017],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87161833,0.039519697,0.017317062,0.0052291634,0.05777815,0.008537632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40880954,0.14425929,0.012059964,0.009764489,0.38447914,0.04062764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27885953,0.004139852,0.0056534014,0.07254629,0.026019495,0.0493093,0.018458623,0.012800161,0.009764474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33321014,0.0022115747,0.0044232113,0.07547244,0.036311917,0.037762627,0.027448878,0.019972185,0.0022248777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021283205,0.00040579826,0.019476194,0.012804893,0.00045620336,0.0005318904,0.017575542,0.0020257647,0.00025117688,0.19287683,0.30935615,0.44402668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037027578,0.000121561556,0.028132798,0.06348464,0.0012624543,0.00025172878,0.07357796,0.0029822902,0.0005195634,0.24439408,0.58419687,0.00070578186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9449077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9634512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84925866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15074134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53501487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904884511","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-07695-1","title":"Citations strength begins at home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); China; Production (economics); Political science; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.395902740489628,"score_gpt":0.5826764081247703,"score_spread":0.1867736676351423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904884511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011528332,0.0029422138,0.016995294,0.021224985,0.0078064324,0.00011079063,0.0083521595,0.004511106,0.9265287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20914292,0.003715013,0.025743723,0.008646293,0.006531832,0.0003144949,0.007323689,0.0060782484,0.7325038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701273,0.00048661485,0.00018755558,0.000565151,0.0014182796,0.00032961258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819356,0.0064693782,0.0011725836,0.0019483333,0.00629561,0.0021785886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027722495,0.0006813935,0.0013505849,0.009822748,0.0034908743,0.00968698,0.0014532587,0.0037659775,0.14559798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024319585,0.0007275757,0.0009625384,0.00797434,0.0021560243,0.012779884,0.0030595905,0.0044244067,0.08245869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001558147,0.000098902165,0.0032275077,0.0003686012,0.000057693796,0.0003475425,0.0014440558,0.00021480447,0.0012283964,0.31100747,0.5209329,0.16091624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003172039,0.000046625508,0.0056949714,0.0002062571,0.00003683674,0.00032699178,0.00053018716,0.00027816085,0.0016341187,0.14390929,0.8472497,0.000055161447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032785223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007096083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001987238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023953575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48707378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905552054","doi":"10.1101/495465","title":"The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Behavioral ecology; Psychology; Ecology; Disadvantaged; Behavioural sciences; Gender bias; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Biology; Political science; Alternative medicine; Psychotherapist; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.4319061493960599,"score_gpt":0.4821322954224687,"score_spread":0.05022614602640879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905552054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054170955,0.10850598,0.096679255,0.6814304,0.07349123,0.0057620397,0.0011386757,0.0016924461,0.025882836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11176573,0.044128068,0.28309926,0.47429538,0.05472464,0.020284874,0.0006457657,0.002048262,0.009008081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.09122016,0.6463264,0.10367313,0.036490954,0.118380725,0.0039085466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02501333,0.68495464,0.079898834,0.117195904,0.08615354,0.0067837015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8393169,0.0037136322,0.010501877,0.015861252,0.008755331,0.025937786,0.012731108,0.04747358,0.0077444483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8994669,0.0050939065,0.009257778,0.011004064,0.050534688,0.03264757,0.017177071,0.03722015,0.008259356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036085134,0.00025931466,0.010550062,0.04486238,0.005173558,0.0017918213,0.027333166,0.0006766785,0.0022019402,0.17578638,0.3771422,0.35061392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019565898,0.00045785226,0.0057289447,0.07940392,0.001639435,0.0033537706,0.003746409,0.002681305,0.0025057187,0.17483343,0.7229445,0.0007480876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029951748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032120596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1606831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012268808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033064615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19815093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908106500","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.005","title":"Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; Robustness (evolution); Discipline; Data science; Data mining; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.7615079244057587,"score_gpt":0.5814149810599263,"score_spread":0.18009294334583237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908106500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689168,0.001378244,0.0028340612,0.00060156925,0.00017056208,0.00007199525,0.0044976505,0.00008423939,0.021444961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907596,0.00038664116,0.0028017007,0.00010113877,0.00012201912,0.00006881448,0.0044824374,0.000041075295,0.0012365842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106616,0.0035429364,0.0011802684,0.0007073335,0.0026458246,0.000857416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8528819,0.09209782,0.021817682,0.007111813,0.020764709,0.005326133],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008995476,0.00034860376,0.0007097425,0.029380048,0.000947903,0.007389792,0.00078071596,0.0011996444,0.0095778005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08237549,0.00018390449,0.0008798636,0.022836592,0.0011416331,0.0038761161,0.0026300012,0.00092213537,0.0018746199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013289015,0.00017756181,0.94116676,0.00037466863,0.000521725,0.00006331469,0.0017370577,0.0005574893,0.0028122745,0.008738606,0.0031243654,0.03939745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010581524,0.0003353108,0.968101,0.00022411621,0.00043577855,0.00009912118,0.006453929,0.0027726518,0.0014881463,0.013831525,0.0061062193,0.000046476303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028134394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034772886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014718439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014477569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04757315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909165781","doi":"","title":"Public Funding of Research and Grant Proposals in the Social Sciences: Empirical Evidence from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public funding; Volatility (finance); Political science; Public economics; Research council; Economics; Social research; Public policy; Empirical evidence; Public administration; Social science; Financial economics; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8755535253053849,"score_gpt":0.6190290908832738,"score_spread":0.25652443442211104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909165781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152865,0.00985149,0.0007461695,0.01836892,0.0001102391,0.00016861958,0.013842453,0.000069800386,0.04155584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633,0.0042259092,0.00045570405,0.00052118505,0.000029416153,0.000035244953,0.0034613693,0.00001769448,0.0049235052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475075,0.0015390639,0.00080700265,0.0009914017,0.009135098,0.002776814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919723,0.039186575,0.017287595,0.003828116,0.03543718,0.01228825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008998112,0.00034833667,0.0012336716,0.006946663,0.006974937,0.007542075,0.0019433479,0.0013133322,0.00573484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05812358,0.0004779035,0.00062842754,0.031196373,0.003135624,0.0014752784,0.002754075,0.0017724151,0.00052157516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006912973,0.00030850986,0.83117986,0.00091122795,0.0005637581,0.0005737881,0.011069836,0.003691607,0.0004064247,0.03454453,0.041828077,0.0742312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016311478,0.00005425942,0.9380466,0.0005983169,0.00029388195,0.00008634883,0.013712763,0.0028976635,0.00041582447,0.0031653664,0.040433418,0.0001325603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100279145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17796874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72757953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909330166","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-102258-0.00005-7","title":"Open Collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Agency (philosophy); Scholarship; Publishing; Open access publishing; Library science; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.478002575616169,"score_gpt":0.547529362609281,"score_spread":0.06952678699311199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909330166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040449676,0.0028587223,0.0024176121,0.0015357161,0.0010796522,0.000028952263,0.00029669207,0.000374017,0.9910041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038416223,0.002113229,0.0012205035,0.00033401986,0.00042528822,0.000056918074,0.000428263,0.0002213796,0.99135876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998544,0.00023018508,0.000086804226,0.00031345466,0.0006775905,0.00014809544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979096,0.00043543515,0.00013276059,0.0005836309,0.00045932757,0.00047923686],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014263586,0.0009237767,0.0006989467,0.0025492157,0.0020853141,0.0094981855,0.0010210158,0.0023624923,0.40103033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042612827,0.0003853872,0.0004829947,0.004440613,0.0015326389,0.008730029,0.005667102,0.001848039,0.27449957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022351851,0.00003618692,0.00019192438,0.00026500822,0.0000072325815,0.00006422466,0.0004398747,0.00014032598,0.00040709667,0.15147795,0.40289244,0.44405535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028652728,0.000005165933,0.00017435034,0.00012787801,0.0000018310133,0.000068188274,0.000103112936,0.00005996855,0.00006634483,0.017987054,0.98140013,0.0000032462779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012853519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027359987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014148678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030735997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85435754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910378291","doi":"10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-17-00007","title":"The Journal Impact Factor of Orthopaedic Journals Does not Predict Individual Paper Citation Rate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAAOS Global Research and Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Subspecialty; Web of science; Scopus; Medicine; Citation analysis; MEDLINE; Computer science; Library science; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Political science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.7932535306562258,"score_gpt":0.67051882888837,"score_spread":0.12273470176785584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910378291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93079,0.02558435,0.009512136,0.0035119518,0.0010500316,0.00027581127,0.014738665,0.00041735914,0.014119752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932475,0.0025906095,0.0028756012,0.00029189335,0.00057223346,0.00011344219,0.0035926993,0.00010170969,0.00053710834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774514,0.003421475,0.0089111505,0.0018694967,0.0076302667,0.0007161174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59056705,0.20852526,0.13592893,0.018781358,0.037999585,0.008197835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026091808,0.00048339315,0.0014711546,0.01938128,0.0006667779,0.0042066,0.00092366367,0.0009899026,0.005240999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26668927,0.0003291072,0.0015155727,0.025169058,0.001010015,0.005134942,0.0016216795,0.0009348485,0.0026588456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019463076,0.000043056312,0.96882546,0.0006983636,0.0005480102,0.000078069446,0.00024434904,0.0003454835,0.0004022231,0.00036363464,0.002616935,0.02563976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004473486,0.00019028124,0.98471504,0.00039966582,0.0003509912,0.0010979024,0.00057381927,0.0013733791,0.00067465514,0.0043523363,0.0061709424,0.00005642384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013841637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012326356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095711334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017135221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13798833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910422483","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v13i2.4066","title":"An Examination of Bibliometrics in Calls for Major Canadian Research Awards","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Bibliometrics; CLARITY; Nomination; Multidisciplinary approach; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.537772614021961,"score_gpt":0.5752178515967156,"score_spread":0.0374452375747546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910422483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223158,0.004458711,0.0037309336,0.00800079,0.0007378705,0.00094506296,0.009901073,0.00046470517,0.1494451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821001,0.0018431091,0.0035467513,0.00023322704,0.00013447995,0.00021289826,0.0025337872,0.00007673355,0.009318833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9289649,0.005388979,0.0047652232,0.0022004412,0.053907927,0.004772491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8680431,0.022981474,0.020896547,0.0044026226,0.07721138,0.006464962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031179106,0.00065672514,0.0011632113,0.069192424,0.008057718,0.008584325,0.0024092693,0.00084515725,0.0041286163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14834331,0.00037483187,0.00078787655,0.09822218,0.0026872747,0.0021665257,0.0058953566,0.0010908471,0.0005798874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004418899,0.00015905335,0.4832164,0.0036506143,0.0004329105,0.00081727194,0.076966666,0.0010704645,0.005808187,0.03133948,0.035557996,0.36053902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000780436,0.000045323402,0.8938504,0.0004055101,0.000074264586,0.0001650656,0.034693673,0.0008020785,0.000796541,0.000942797,0.06806989,0.00014667175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77949697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8500625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96882087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045378666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08650839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44360322},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2911016227","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2018.0045","title":"Credit, Copyright, and the Circulation of Scientific Knowledge: The Royal Society in the Long Nineteenth Century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Royal Society","keywords":"Copying; Legislation; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Law; Reuse; Originality; Balance sheet; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Finance; Creativity; Engineering","score_opus":0.22897284567623058,"score_gpt":0.49410980942515753,"score_spread":0.2651369637489269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911016227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059979673,0.27157128,0.011974924,0.27899018,0.004757458,0.000054050262,0.00014179068,0.000087568646,0.37244305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84241873,0.087881505,0.004588536,0.012168647,0.005210306,0.00008270534,0.000063506544,0.000099942416,0.04748606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97246605,0.010605835,0.0019617777,0.0020117925,0.011261652,0.0016928845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392095,0.037854634,0.0077341734,0.0038702872,0.007954727,0.0033767421],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028761107,0.00040960065,0.0007109393,0.0060921344,0.0066245114,0.022130672,0.0010573495,0.006106894,0.0041031116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06125441,0.00052951684,0.0003138324,0.009707656,0.05084715,0.020132925,0.006064876,0.0053408816,0.00061583094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024471728,0.0000103040775,0.00069730985,0.00017819996,0.000010410874,0.000099501165,0.009712932,0.00013021656,0.000076320386,0.959615,0.0057813516,0.023663996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025735122,0.000032919677,0.003635227,0.00091597956,0.000013133964,0.00023484029,0.004241512,0.00027502183,0.00017802659,0.4688302,0.5215423,0.000075133314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028755825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025621377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025531178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016216194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18524253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911268485","doi":"","title":"Research Impact Responsibilities: Policy Alternatives for Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.2125347363266677,"score_gpt":0.47137206895294453,"score_spread":0.25883733262627684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911268485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022294639,0.007902675,0.017373726,0.7166723,0.0022417353,0.0028417567,0.0016927373,0.00048196726,0.22849846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54007214,0.011375253,0.10976652,0.2526798,0.001557626,0.0051332437,0.0014967682,0.00034413132,0.077574596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8514155,0.036272023,0.009340782,0.00959568,0.059973925,0.033402123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74446195,0.112600096,0.008244757,0.010993643,0.09459859,0.029100949],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10832814,0.0018665165,0.0018679829,0.010398447,0.026030097,0.04820147,0.011494878,0.024902077,0.012623677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21112597,0.0023222908,0.0033357637,0.012034992,0.023135688,0.017800888,0.013254173,0.018540733,0.0009776624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024391864,0.00015659552,0.0049165506,0.0008279654,0.000112188616,0.00040261727,0.0036724731,0.00508566,0.00067711424,0.90201056,0.045052044,0.03684242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008437041,0.00041435545,0.024649967,0.005410338,0.0008567029,0.00039032352,0.021989895,0.015735535,0.0029126632,0.34703445,0.5789508,0.0008113247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9542939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98960155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28330716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.65873545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8312621},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2911600539","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501073","title":"Peer review, bibliometrics and altmetrics ‐ Do we need them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bibliometrics; Citation; Science Citation Index; Computer science; Impact factor; Proxy (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Social media; Data science; Toolbox; Data mining; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.2820165169104853,"score_gpt":0.4876526026311676,"score_spread":0.20563608572068232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911600539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068341795,0.108037874,0.0060987417,0.85597986,0.019730605,0.00006207829,0.00009058847,0.00015374947,0.009163035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14018315,0.41166806,0.029869944,0.23331596,0.1629186,0.0007063439,0.0004551036,0.0008790558,0.02000385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8407887,0.08935816,0.009035562,0.0070811966,0.05102955,0.00270687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56596226,0.22605225,0.01915165,0.017983,0.16321361,0.007637168],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1617095,0.0012849168,0.0031248513,0.012919937,0.0055879136,0.031933147,0.003997547,0.011804874,0.0072763325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39025643,0.0006849183,0.0013848137,0.0193435,0.026657443,0.058906224,0.007848307,0.014386168,0.0049372683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006482111,0.000053071755,0.0016435009,0.0026045647,0.00013613398,0.00008411595,0.0038074423,0.00036957618,0.00022699527,0.25221825,0.4512875,0.2875041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028356686,0.000051361676,0.002045763,0.005071699,0.00004470997,0.00013512796,0.0058778278,0.0006715565,0.00029390317,0.20573615,0.7798846,0.00015897825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057100262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041466476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010334467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020671727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552118},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2911656051","doi":"10.17705/1atrr.00032","title":"Does “Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars Journal Basket…” Support the Basket with Bibliometric Measures?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Sample (material); Context (archaeology); Centrality; Quality (philosophy); Relevance (law); Set (abstract data type); Association (psychology); Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; History; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6178053222731595,"score_gpt":0.6168308394371105,"score_spread":0.000974482836049062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911656051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7795969,0.027294224,0.042666584,0.08104507,0.0046972367,0.0011567412,0.00541712,0.0004647132,0.05766139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96714383,0.003383277,0.016975641,0.006196071,0.0025947983,0.00047290715,0.0018486014,0.00013286677,0.0012519773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9470996,0.022905752,0.007380887,0.0051797433,0.015386817,0.0020472188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5296589,0.21406996,0.13940191,0.038579743,0.0674496,0.010839927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0984376,0.0010678596,0.0026236773,0.022560982,0.002288868,0.013404984,0.0037002198,0.0023463059,0.005672586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32385534,0.0006689828,0.0030108613,0.03580756,0.0054634493,0.019517053,0.0074865944,0.0026296822,0.0016301118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066535204,0.00045992876,0.8272891,0.0017652854,0.0029022149,0.00009665201,0.0033455507,0.00055812136,0.0002011084,0.024794811,0.015221676,0.122700185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044606059,0.0012973121,0.86551476,0.0024231747,0.0020596678,0.00027295743,0.006563789,0.010322041,0.0008021602,0.072658494,0.03734564,0.0002939039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009090877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97743905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034089843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054232823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.520594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912977760","doi":"10.1177/0739456x19827083","title":"Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.6307634190323469,"score_gpt":0.6496542888280322,"score_spread":0.018890869795685328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912977760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8013575,0.027927075,0.0070695127,0.07493446,0.0039903154,0.0002417221,0.0038942494,0.00074716413,0.07983792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749517,0.0069292705,0.0028808962,0.0062017688,0.0015673836,0.00010347559,0.0013883085,0.00028064562,0.0056965146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903668,0.0020849537,0.0011312333,0.0018145922,0.0037825585,0.00081982574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8855759,0.056802917,0.026747722,0.006237843,0.01878131,0.0058541973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009408726,0.0004140575,0.001098788,0.00834191,0.002447941,0.0071889632,0.0015054023,0.0016440542,0.015079695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11596224,0.0005640593,0.0009188084,0.027526174,0.0021799535,0.0073908027,0.0018651942,0.0015099591,0.0054503814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006250855,0.0002190399,0.59676045,0.0032687064,0.0012297108,0.0012121054,0.013372361,0.0003752701,0.0024778554,0.010475244,0.06181604,0.30816814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014032345,0.00024379596,0.82652247,0.0012927651,0.00079624035,0.0017295744,0.03231262,0.0007976319,0.0024318094,0.0393365,0.094248146,0.00014801716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066841966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011949078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016494124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020002571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05044663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913313145","doi":"","title":"Les déterminants de la capacité d'absorption des connaissances : le cas des courtiers de connaissances œuvrant dans le domaine de la santé au Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07369701540744901,"score_gpt":0.37428537885994617,"score_spread":0.3005883634524972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913313145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394845,0.0005549953,0.0018599787,0.01178625,0.00003700552,0.00015714117,0.0008117938,0.000050084378,0.04525832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945831,0.0001601378,0.0003116378,0.00025395094,0.000007983459,0.000021910077,0.00011771584,0.000013537017,0.0045300215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991999,0.0017969708,0.00028796343,0.00063601515,0.002245753,0.0030343772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632909,0.011787283,0.003850057,0.0014818839,0.009580166,0.010009716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054767234,0.00031458578,0.00045322694,0.0015244852,0.004586521,0.00574,0.0019526464,0.0009916773,0.01243014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031325124,0.000358484,0.00058917,0.0025607112,0.0038711207,0.0018534792,0.003774956,0.0020961552,0.0005698992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022228742,0.0001870966,0.8672983,0.00019077094,0.00022465772,0.00040845864,0.02861921,0.003952845,0.00092145056,0.044703647,0.008384745,0.04488656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021629501,0.000063066116,0.92872435,0.00025561836,0.000075073214,0.00009124597,0.035676584,0.004258651,0.00037407316,0.005953175,0.024435138,0.00007142314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96010816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96248287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042014085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08536409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30483496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913618511","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501020","title":"How authors cite references? A study of characteristics of in‐text citations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverb; Adjective; Verb; Noun; Citation; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information retrieval; Psychology; History; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.22828788400427727,"score_gpt":0.47108577355034753,"score_spread":0.24279788954607026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913618511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98497933,0.00344495,0.002192442,0.00044386432,0.00010384105,0.000040620627,0.0010506685,0.00008252459,0.0076618134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971378,0.0006426729,0.0005382328,0.000032359843,0.00014282574,0.000021719738,0.0007182972,0.000029415825,0.00073665916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930167,0.0019325222,0.0014662481,0.0006243424,0.0025861422,0.00037405032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7673821,0.15591149,0.04447606,0.004039868,0.025200486,0.0029900598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058668763,0.00026367587,0.00081367395,0.01926347,0.0011420992,0.0041710264,0.0008268731,0.0010076056,0.0032748142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11037598,0.00012956101,0.00044084972,0.036532365,0.0008267337,0.0049010664,0.0012480114,0.0005641774,0.0012732787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039167985,0.00022304554,0.90357715,0.00086569384,0.00043695024,0.0006479819,0.005023045,0.00073111884,0.0023294245,0.0033276565,0.0026949882,0.07975111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145424,0.00028139804,0.96264035,0.00021976333,0.00031507184,0.0017872503,0.008914007,0.0045949374,0.003172916,0.0049868226,0.012979034,0.00007706021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011492354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012532192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009929475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006509682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031027317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913685823","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0211963","title":"Measuring national capability over big science’s multidisciplinarity: A case study of nuclear fusion research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Tokamak; Big data; Nuclear fusion; Science policy; Multidisciplinary approach; Computer science; Data science; Political science; Nuclear physics; Physics; Plasma; Data mining; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.8747569257144527,"score_gpt":0.5857780844606228,"score_spread":0.2889788412538299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913685823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882075,0.00050311146,0.0022724,0.0009413982,0.000012412694,0.000045011973,0.0017491797,0.000037957856,0.006231051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957217,0.0003410338,0.0023066788,0.000036372738,0.000014876437,0.00003662293,0.0011103883,0.000015871476,0.00041640768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821126,0.0010085758,0.000108910914,0.00019825385,0.00025503174,0.00021801624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901007,0.0068117175,0.0011840231,0.0004423367,0.0008385107,0.0006226848],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002475086,0.00029679292,0.00045725034,0.008332736,0.0013153941,0.0025879855,0.0005482911,0.0008062503,0.0018158306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010058772,0.0001395453,0.00078324316,0.028268134,0.0010867034,0.003821244,0.0016002785,0.00080755516,0.00022664366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046035845,0.0007448063,0.79659694,0.0010941154,0.0005997185,0.00301885,0.020442305,0.050321605,0.0014909855,0.046555445,0.009432498,0.06924241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010586787,0.00023172011,0.76160824,0.00030402793,0.0003180102,0.0010124595,0.073936135,0.10880705,0.001643684,0.022771271,0.02913426,0.00012741076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03684816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03853518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027849586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015504999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07326734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914500730","doi":"10.1186/s12916-019-1249-1","title":"The democratization of scientific publishing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sinai Health System; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Medicine; Commercialization; Democratization; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Scientific publishing; Internet privacy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.8908608467028656,"score_gpt":0.6634190669584947,"score_spread":0.22744177974437085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914500730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002549552,0.44405556,0.0060202945,0.4503531,0.0149848135,0.00004892948,0.000100859994,0.00012997884,0.08175694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2320423,0.5038146,0.009156477,0.17933494,0.056360256,0.00039816316,0.00015844936,0.00032572213,0.018409122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9301446,0.039192896,0.0047911843,0.0047760797,0.01854823,0.0025469388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8667564,0.08371855,0.015715102,0.017315835,0.012795163,0.0036989003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048946477,0.00041483366,0.0011979544,0.00438081,0.0030167028,0.01896763,0.0022997612,0.0049219616,0.0070140334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11581386,0.0007730014,0.00096593396,0.0066977474,0.015856668,0.023345845,0.008515339,0.009898844,0.0036254402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038720853,0.000020218422,0.0003958796,0.0033652121,0.00012133402,0.00011667921,0.0020747888,0.00031382963,0.00026320058,0.7291636,0.094987184,0.16913934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019983869,0.000016661706,0.0010994736,0.0038292957,0.000028238454,0.00020627341,0.0008103086,0.000092607115,0.00017560455,0.17087643,0.8228217,0.000023387473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019710409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024253952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076842946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015930137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25885683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916307675","doi":"10.5334/kula.42","title":"Joining Voices: University – Industry Partnerships in the Humanities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Negotiation; Public relations; Work (physics); Engaged scholarship; Reading (process); Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.7330843264663779,"score_gpt":0.583554223708977,"score_spread":0.14953010275740086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916307675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67813313,0.0028681527,0.019433368,0.038938023,0.00060102233,0.00039385643,0.00008790401,0.00015877033,0.25938568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98844737,0.00060212635,0.0031417923,0.0011626972,0.00006179289,0.000100707395,0.000032143293,0.000021838363,0.0064296247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9475165,0.04330195,0.0006633018,0.0010378032,0.0035316732,0.0039487397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94739383,0.028602375,0.0042249057,0.002966443,0.00279693,0.014015531],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028506348,0.0001985873,0.00024306595,0.0021188487,0.015122453,0.021685565,0.00129067,0.0024434833,0.010716694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041971937,0.00030487304,0.00033434137,0.0035772673,0.006617035,0.01403799,0.026516441,0.0029438636,0.0010632196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001648889,0.0007144764,0.055840634,0.00042467995,0.000057351237,0.001619821,0.39046946,0.00042841773,0.001114672,0.19219111,0.017973159,0.33900133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346727,0.0002502342,0.011253123,0.0003426684,0.00003323832,0.0007482639,0.7647699,0.0007942104,0.0011310306,0.051794894,0.16878143,0.000057610265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002064285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006988544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97831446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047720824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01331197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15075779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916932281","doi":"10.5334/kula.47","title":"Networking Social Scholarship…Again","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Professional association; Science communication; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; History; Law; Science education; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6254603893258378,"score_gpt":0.6320421837582847,"score_spread":0.006581794432446886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916932281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027274663,0.0058245673,0.00536607,0.1003539,0.0047837687,0.0000931429,0.00023559775,0.00021108032,0.85585725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57762325,0.010170304,0.0048782993,0.016108517,0.005640397,0.00034079552,0.0004562445,0.000156959,0.38462532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963013,0.0019691424,0.00012961219,0.0003532292,0.0009564322,0.00029027782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935495,0.0028825651,0.0006387156,0.00094100606,0.0007884543,0.001199694],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003286908,0.00027113626,0.00031953395,0.0020410235,0.0043850024,0.010172552,0.0008847277,0.0022609367,0.047872417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099511305,0.00015130284,0.0002975562,0.0030036473,0.0048086937,0.008717398,0.0051403376,0.0022323192,0.0092912605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003556904,0.00007854307,0.003261012,0.00022218234,0.000014725301,0.00021417906,0.024228308,0.00011103,0.00035481193,0.7296708,0.081336066,0.16047288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007209636,0.000034854962,0.0011981503,0.00023213908,0.0000064085566,0.00012793056,0.009916513,0.00014632942,0.0001434161,0.04757425,0.9406033,0.000009526127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016402213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002658798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99795896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019568913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027747378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16014922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917178759","doi":"10.7554/elife.42254","title":"How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Public relations; Subject (documents); Citation; Public service; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics; Computer science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.46894525042798846,"score_gpt":0.5173974203884864,"score_spread":0.04845216996049789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917178759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86079276,0.009253581,0.006613848,0.038990445,0.00039430652,0.00018690544,0.0017025117,0.00011246032,0.08195303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965473,0.00075959024,0.0007597866,0.00039347913,0.00022372499,0.00006803006,0.00022395105,0.000038313032,0.0009859594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8642827,0.059143737,0.009695646,0.0058154156,0.05260914,0.008453278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5366584,0.26559642,0.10338002,0.026492056,0.056377497,0.011495711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07923584,0.0003145204,0.001575512,0.021192793,0.0052991495,0.02706204,0.0016432616,0.0019224271,0.004683774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29245114,0.00056164974,0.0005931273,0.035059758,0.011825028,0.01784582,0.0067065093,0.002104997,0.0007700183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048562224,0.00039003542,0.5318653,0.0020905212,0.00074879726,0.00048207614,0.08668417,0.00070031773,0.0017405204,0.09995439,0.011583517,0.2632747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078867866,0.00026370597,0.73260087,0.0021395495,0.00035066443,0.00060475944,0.120130114,0.001520616,0.002155706,0.048769407,0.09119442,0.00019134492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011454647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021535976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021220705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017558325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41904414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917432326","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2018-0125","title":"Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Citation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3639709923264734,"score_gpt":0.5913081892117475,"score_spread":0.22733719688527415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917432326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.391539,0.012289973,0.3077056,0.04662331,0.00090578274,0.000654566,0.00045218342,0.00035070453,0.23947886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475297,0.002296409,0.045576204,0.00042557315,0.00015089381,0.00045546956,0.00006900126,0.000063391984,0.0034333155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98058164,0.010518288,0.0013092187,0.0013260221,0.0056291698,0.00063568103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90401924,0.07577891,0.0070975823,0.004484785,0.0076170913,0.0010024278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019564,0.00058828853,0.00090527657,0.025510283,0.008062934,0.014742065,0.0020469413,0.0026245173,0.0033014147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081370465,0.0004585679,0.0011312427,0.023084259,0.027341746,0.018822538,0.0049986355,0.002132286,0.00035548775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645408,0.000029294748,0.009265834,0.0004148948,0.000023200722,0.00018498227,0.026482217,0.0007818593,0.00036673638,0.9181616,0.0011555286,0.04309738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019649851,0.00007082246,0.0056184335,0.00053608674,0.00003662868,0.00056031725,0.028178887,0.0041337097,0.000769274,0.9283391,0.03168252,0.000054608383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003992525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039208136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011389466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007812081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10346556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917900233","doi":"10.5683/sp2/vmmbnh","title":"Predatory Health Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.684764535541735,"score_gpt":0.6343899949904206,"score_spread":0.050374540551314406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917900233","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036527677,0.001629406,0.000275264,0.00063147635,0.000119508295,0.000116661984,0.9880884,0.00032388186,0.0051625865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011713818,0.0014506815,0.0018970937,0.00055244967,0.00014553493,0.00074822427,0.9785003,0.00015977849,0.004832067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989856,0.0019309554,0.0024512068,0.0018139009,0.0031384453,0.00080941955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599311,0.013027878,0.014136228,0.0046111103,0.0066433335,0.0016505306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048615565,0.0011563826,0.0013800885,0.014207465,0.0015313609,0.004487969,0.0023019055,0.0014787785,0.036653552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049017545,0.00082288496,0.0011128077,0.024857223,0.0007621058,0.0022774704,0.0027873788,0.001826209,0.02073705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060242094,0.00006246489,0.031227445,0.011731514,0.00039836962,0.00017991527,0.00066576595,0.00033871963,0.000431892,0.0053630043,0.9291662,0.019832289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040974957,0.000034389344,0.034287814,0.0023865087,0.0002367135,0.00032137547,0.0003826572,0.000228085,0.0004866519,0.0019186976,0.95926476,0.00004269664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020974308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04067082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026513897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063779866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12261832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918023730","doi":"10.5334/kula.43","title":"The Initial Impact of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; General partnership; Observatory; Political science; Digital scholarship; Order (exchange); Public relations; Public administration; Business; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6711811087149504,"score_gpt":0.6776356465126533,"score_spread":0.006454537797702886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918023730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3671343,0.0046478347,0.014800477,0.4409638,0.008675948,0.002464175,0.0028592579,0.0013247735,0.15712932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146314,0.0011863968,0.0123816,0.019304905,0.0012315593,0.0012098888,0.0013339674,0.0003601238,0.048360147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9429901,0.016179342,0.0019900994,0.0042218273,0.02410896,0.010509706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83176285,0.06063049,0.011042209,0.011006179,0.030215422,0.05534283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09766633,0.00048488096,0.0006523976,0.002731962,0.015386378,0.021065617,0.0022561366,0.0073597757,0.008068484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13390304,0.00096213777,0.0007426918,0.0030442874,0.011478343,0.012725494,0.029421074,0.013057443,0.001125117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015040227,0.002586963,0.089742504,0.001318507,0.00012565346,0.0030799638,0.071608886,0.0020990581,0.0062318696,0.3714526,0.2248544,0.22539543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024112342,0.0006850852,0.06157114,0.00076837384,0.000035413635,0.00019136637,0.049214877,0.0010484572,0.0039538164,0.021481952,0.8606004,0.00020789806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06886057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08785601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99774384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030366553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12368865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51651514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291864439","doi":"10.1007/bf03022313","title":"Towards open access journals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.3929797568919386,"score_gpt":0.5192815606216892,"score_spread":0.12630180372975058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291864439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007091926,0.03908986,0.040608518,0.29240096,0.04480184,0.00054095837,0.0020384437,0.0033201913,0.5701073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18279904,0.07812213,0.07634473,0.12576091,0.10463581,0.0022840162,0.007713543,0.004877538,0.41746226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8971689,0.03632567,0.009362752,0.0066356594,0.045508955,0.0049980152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54265684,0.13869211,0.038811255,0.072652526,0.12862153,0.0785657],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073735535,0.0011079282,0.0022513813,0.017944591,0.0065607084,0.06634595,0.0057519483,0.012736281,0.06628062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30477658,0.00104238,0.0011262407,0.028949713,0.016440379,0.054980777,0.021677595,0.009970542,0.050182875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101026715,0.00013321188,0.0024367508,0.0013010823,0.000060065468,0.00034531107,0.0034200684,0.00013693534,0.00041400018,0.42838934,0.34193292,0.22132917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002106157,0.000027626731,0.0011801447,0.00056147185,0.000010403528,0.00022067003,0.0013646018,0.000094361436,0.00010207829,0.12293457,0.87345856,0.000024436184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010604666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014283273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99424803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006290021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025196737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38995546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919017259","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvcj2w0k.32","title":"Les grandes étapes du développement des sciences au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.6274794396192399,"score_gpt":0.5129783175131106,"score_spread":0.11450112210612928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919017259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33933058,0.057559375,0.0071682846,0.03725836,0.0010106086,0.00019871711,0.0071277516,0.00067085866,0.54967546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7385823,0.019199267,0.0062802867,0.0019476593,0.00019942934,0.00010109962,0.0012072395,0.00022639724,0.23225641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585044,0.00036539903,0.000114137125,0.0004331597,0.0020630423,0.0011738947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552274,0.00084340177,0.00032985245,0.00013121024,0.0020271004,0.0011457744],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002169508,0.00091491913,0.00057322066,0.005059847,0.0075423457,0.009628535,0.0007952815,0.0015114328,0.008626315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006738987,0.0006810708,0.0007432902,0.008458707,0.0045297346,0.0018885676,0.0022525704,0.0044022338,0.00074180024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004089008,0.000091871734,0.029080441,0.00060661207,0.00017146721,0.0010444326,0.01970803,0.0046725646,0.0041907476,0.59892684,0.06716467,0.2739335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040962794,0.000052603387,0.13093925,0.00042284402,0.000047374826,0.00029294746,0.007037478,0.0011303393,0.0017742128,0.009900976,0.8482609,0.0001001843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99090755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99465984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99494016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16010253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14953826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97416204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919425555","doi":"10.1111/caje.12579","title":"On the information contents of indirect citations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Index (typography); Computer science; Political science; Library science; Data mining; World Wide Web; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6994631789449368,"score_gpt":0.35727476157224536,"score_spread":0.34218841737269146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919425555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78349733,0.013923108,0.042283,0.004859987,0.00064609677,0.00018593342,0.006335319,0.00025652672,0.14801262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989131,0.0026043865,0.0029398669,0.00011596269,0.0004506263,0.00005889439,0.0013997566,0.000041449435,0.0032580935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742764,0.0008051361,0.0002689107,0.00030098108,0.0009838737,0.00021329406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8661068,0.10877701,0.006252576,0.003952372,0.013824127,0.0010871915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004468359,0.00045743125,0.0007195577,0.016382996,0.0008259781,0.0047568926,0.0006823676,0.0008895772,0.012131114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1072774,0.00023877858,0.00032405008,0.014750447,0.0013469318,0.0051644524,0.0017211091,0.00085022935,0.001650684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012157183,0.0002803369,0.15066656,0.0016532309,0.0005428237,0.000544368,0.0015423753,0.024162307,0.0043062135,0.48910406,0.013719557,0.31226254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014330084,0.00033727495,0.14925161,0.0011871535,0.00075770443,0.00090069254,0.0011921205,0.07094243,0.007992893,0.7402727,0.026861431,0.000160762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009521872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076734944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014166746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008380905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040582657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919782064","doi":"10.1038/s41467-019-08814-w","title":"Publisher Correction: Capturing variation impact on molecular interactions in the IMEx Consortium mutations data set","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Discovery Centre; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Variation (astronomy); Computational biology; Order (exchange); Data set; Library science; Information retrieval; Data science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.49417284895335195,"score_gpt":0.5928650619301072,"score_spread":0.09869221297675529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919782064","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001955323,0.0021917466,0.01270679,0.07364338,0.80610305,0.00010917405,0.084711716,0.004080456,0.01449844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08274194,0.010525358,0.057391964,0.064720385,0.09922513,0.0009456371,0.16709289,0.021825464,0.4955312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98495424,0.0026193238,0.0026670364,0.0020509968,0.0070898165,0.0006186703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88420665,0.041102093,0.004905468,0.01251479,0.05550664,0.0017643927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012656092,0.0021106226,0.002105034,0.007823421,0.002883242,0.007623147,0.0034830703,0.0036093397,0.12854475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20720576,0.0011880096,0.0017588506,0.012368509,0.0017369816,0.0029306877,0.003687178,0.007123257,0.05379462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029420042,0.0000060400585,0.00044023612,0.00016037136,0.000032037588,0.00015891559,0.000059362428,0.0001338372,0.00006362983,0.0011691509,0.98829097,0.009455935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080463244,0.000021098607,0.0031277176,0.0007584569,0.00015503234,0.0009340294,0.00019299056,0.001026359,0.0009387485,0.004604239,0.9880562,0.00010478024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025457013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029101472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12854475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032778443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008738876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43002504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920542261","doi":"10.5334/kula.16","title":"Historicizing the Knowledge Commons: Open Access, Technical Knowledge, and the Industrial Application of Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Open science; Relation (database); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge sharing; Open access publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5934193188110289,"score_gpt":0.6279976310489943,"score_spread":0.03457831223796537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920542261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11744617,0.18779436,0.043347467,0.27119735,0.004002008,0.00011435598,0.00036610579,0.00013287031,0.37559932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340906,0.044897094,0.0062583233,0.004408766,0.0023494894,0.000099570716,0.00009565345,0.000081515565,0.007718979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635095,0.008414905,0.00060168817,0.00082812173,0.0029913455,0.00081304094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96405935,0.02721534,0.0030254775,0.0029182546,0.0018206246,0.0009609231],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01748209,0.00028852225,0.0006044783,0.01244654,0.0079348255,0.022588192,0.0014227363,0.003853095,0.0035755238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03443308,0.00030745653,0.00038101178,0.017429348,0.06095973,0.04592891,0.010009861,0.0063275998,0.00031586122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001732603,0.000012925439,0.0008158533,0.00012247512,0.0000049894775,0.00006735898,0.017842678,0.00013826993,0.000047327154,0.96405077,0.0015049685,0.015375147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004696239,0.000022707938,0.00273495,0.0013737027,0.000011247614,0.00023117517,0.03415932,0.00035916877,0.00034256114,0.7710608,0.18966302,0.000036609963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005023907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055663367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99857724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011554108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007170643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09245521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920907292","doi":"","title":"","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.6577887895015732,"score_gpt":0.5416214260186945,"score_spread":0.1161673634828787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920907292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12543848,0.15466936,0.009037336,0.31559312,0.0492494,0.00042549797,0.02327773,0.0011677623,0.32114127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186082,0.08129779,0.010445913,0.06486015,0.030862872,0.00081599754,0.014775145,0.0005217475,0.2778122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883831,0.0033017483,0.0010350496,0.001668909,0.004600118,0.0010110149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395649,0.028287193,0.006282604,0.0032413837,0.016786493,0.005837499],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008689165,0.00041880028,0.0008133616,0.007975762,0.0026822826,0.0051153526,0.0007521753,0.0024657676,0.05695105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060687,0.000346972,0.0007415978,0.008420384,0.0011757895,0.0030437068,0.0017642245,0.0019820952,0.011987099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062618015,0.00012844859,0.04938106,0.0027348637,0.00021381707,0.0005688411,0.0040952736,0.00013300688,0.0023372327,0.03719679,0.44561043,0.45697412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005401809,0.00009288062,0.06816643,0.0011786772,0.000085021624,0.0010613336,0.0019705987,0.00013657307,0.00094526244,0.0025227163,0.923743,0.0000433863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015005527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0238169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94304895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037982932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073011257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921399224","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.71602","title":"Rigorous policies ensure integrity of NLM literature databases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National library; Computer science; MEDLINE; Database; Medicine; World Wide Web; Data science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2988147166144051,"score_gpt":0.4972170919798349,"score_spread":0.19840237536542976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921399224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013672408,0.0055329865,0.1157589,0.7874805,0.046579123,0.006699761,0.003838473,0.0037083533,0.029034767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04750337,0.009624973,0.35693416,0.4550088,0.048794847,0.02389332,0.010114305,0.0054197065,0.042706504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.35663566,0.273841,0.17271234,0.029169746,0.15466134,0.012979858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.043114576,0.40921152,0.042637885,0.26814863,0.22014232,0.016745104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.550884,0.0019381801,0.013444083,0.01854268,0.008869733,0.059894405,0.019153146,0.046473537,0.049107973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8706675,0.006564781,0.005506367,0.027446002,0.039149646,0.043830357,0.027873486,0.059924684,0.0898429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007257637,0.00029878409,0.0016574354,0.003440068,0.00054543215,0.0010803605,0.008405613,0.00038569598,0.0017689185,0.09865938,0.75851786,0.12451473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004109149,0.00010884765,0.0016279976,0.006702304,0.00013463869,0.0007632811,0.0015657606,0.0014576147,0.0011303474,0.07984989,0.9059799,0.00026855632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004550408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004965196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.449116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145807285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11516505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55384004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921565448","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03066-3","title":"What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; National Cancer Institute; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; National Institutes of Health; Impact Fund; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; European Commission; National Research Centre; Nature","keywords":"Basic research; Public funding; Political science; Institution; Public domain; Public institution; Public relations; Public administration; Library science","score_opus":0.8248587450899906,"score_gpt":0.6784602035793619,"score_spread":0.1463985415106287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921565448","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41794065,0.43935397,0.010986593,0.07960161,0.0018726155,0.00057639705,0.006610511,0.00010006187,0.042957667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406457,0.045885965,0.004179148,0.004656815,0.0015577008,0.00026491206,0.0021466585,0.00003831397,0.00062479725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85014087,0.08150322,0.02850771,0.0066806856,0.029920017,0.0032474448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30839399,0.53298074,0.098185115,0.019718772,0.032650612,0.00807076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.114416,0.00091164245,0.0038847406,0.041868027,0.0014983816,0.0129702715,0.0036510348,0.0041587395,0.0056577083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38067406,0.00074071554,0.0039472813,0.054803524,0.008081115,0.009932451,0.0063027604,0.0020725026,0.0009707526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002898439,0.0004522898,0.675184,0.030464314,0.012047691,0.00050941424,0.004737148,0.0012479944,0.0004848367,0.034181662,0.008250018,0.22954217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057337835,0.00096565956,0.8356738,0.025763404,0.0077197165,0.00254721,0.010016715,0.0019073538,0.0009274532,0.06243085,0.05125981,0.0002146645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043503037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005798811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95813197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00689615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60509694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922152001","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.015","title":"A cross-sectional description of open access publication costs, policies and impact in emergency medicine and critical care journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Scopus; Interquartile range; Purchasing power parity; Impact factor; Turkish; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Business; Political science; Finance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7233153791963524,"score_gpt":0.6748636395905908,"score_spread":0.048451739605761546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922152001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.940282,0.0054469467,0.0010166807,0.0009553218,0.000060534214,0.0003708911,0.046529066,0.00008649544,0.005252086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956514,0.0022040035,0.0014437352,0.0003006214,0.0001345387,0.0007770602,0.014618704,0.000051817624,0.0009044167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872497,0.002208032,0.004761525,0.001385505,0.0037497147,0.0006456286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85737795,0.045804437,0.07258345,0.0039175753,0.015990246,0.004326412],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010296058,0.0003491835,0.00077693275,0.013985218,0.00079738116,0.0031269838,0.0008084059,0.0006914374,0.0065834257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04954111,0.00048906956,0.001003351,0.026493976,0.0007535898,0.0046166773,0.0014686015,0.0009689337,0.0016779988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010101324,0.00008095508,0.9922259,0.00030765418,0.00018856773,0.000056114666,0.0002772226,0.000078585064,0.00006278165,0.00017685838,0.0013944582,0.005049858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059881313,0.00008126421,0.99660975,0.000116780786,0.00005970702,0.00048969703,0.0004860887,0.00012591155,0.000075552,0.00009925935,0.0018331294,0.000016817625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002525697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024954989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015926212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016982557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054451406},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2922325102","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.71703","title":"The authors respond to “Rigorous policies ensure integrity of NLM literature databases”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; National database; Database; Research integrity; Data science; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.2809331693544619,"score_gpt":0.5086315111524363,"score_spread":0.22769834179797444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922325102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008569359,0.00017385524,0.00015990563,0.9885308,0.010458354,0.00001147251,0.000023825269,0.000033539854,0.00052253983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010396148,0.00019147218,0.0005072155,0.98476046,0.012059772,0.000036481364,0.000016759734,0.000027639191,0.001360646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9362271,0.012509219,0.010333579,0.0062783533,0.028418457,0.00623331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6747921,0.16002937,0.025177993,0.013926366,0.09830126,0.027772838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0439392,0.0011795317,0.003580141,0.0020375561,0.013851645,0.016070165,0.006040438,0.12948152,0.0128864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32964262,0.0020150852,0.0019452401,0.003940285,0.012049908,0.011287532,0.0076384535,0.13994095,0.01346723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021168407,0.00002295774,0.00025123954,0.00006930205,0.0000097153215,0.00037244853,0.00030403843,0.000033189073,0.00013435307,0.002804138,0.9922462,0.003731263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007564621,0.000044138862,0.0007536276,0.00067579513,0.000032774355,0.0010083565,0.00095180277,0.0007178564,0.0005231709,0.010660839,0.98440415,0.00015184858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011788115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019056331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014144199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032492932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2323755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922881746","doi":"10.17705/1cais.04413","title":"Looking Beyond the Pointing Finger: Ensuring the Success of the Scholarly Capital Model in the Contemporary Academic Environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Outreach; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Intellectual capital; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social capital; Political science; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; History; Law","score_opus":0.3236772749104296,"score_gpt":0.45239189693757875,"score_spread":0.12871462202714917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922881746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11011775,0.0054712063,0.2422466,0.4569684,0.002219636,0.0006515898,0.0003858615,0.0011448169,0.18079415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90339464,0.0014193014,0.07507229,0.011313884,0.00096234697,0.0004107866,0.000085617845,0.00025587255,0.007085288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9040754,0.051076468,0.0043085297,0.008686077,0.027215663,0.004637963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57719547,0.24812822,0.033977322,0.0714832,0.050758474,0.018457308],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13543722,0.00097041973,0.0019258747,0.0075086406,0.010588808,0.040157784,0.0050841165,0.0075167934,0.0059871483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37323868,0.00089399493,0.00086938194,0.00746931,0.038401462,0.061658338,0.019661201,0.009016968,0.0032485516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021347305,0.0002517594,0.025682235,0.00048334413,0.000103820596,0.000229852,0.016420783,0.001520429,0.00081618014,0.7231112,0.027121976,0.20404492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007858155,0.00024311212,0.010478114,0.0013535675,0.00007023867,0.00026880362,0.009723716,0.0073773623,0.0017014025,0.8957426,0.072724395,0.00023808774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007375144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007246633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99249136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011081124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02646531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.716269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925048720","doi":"10.1038/s41557-019-0236-7","title":"Charting a course for chemistry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Chemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2802426624317443,"score_gpt":0.5757821151421088,"score_spread":0.29553945271036447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925048720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016276093,0.0030494453,0.039690543,0.2061581,0.032797214,0.0027725084,0.002826393,0.00549141,0.6909384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06679059,0.0018658839,0.07175822,0.008223946,0.004412128,0.00077717175,0.0018445853,0.0007005147,0.843627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957527,0.0007696315,0.0001625271,0.00061465794,0.0017149175,0.0009855789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982053,0.0007082294,0.00069628377,0.0008292039,0.002828645,0.012884593],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004433906,0.0010705568,0.0007269228,0.0020535022,0.010028216,0.014508248,0.0029874272,0.007362853,0.1184306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008848585,0.00057641143,0.00084697764,0.001914418,0.003031211,0.008411323,0.00787046,0.011450717,0.05262837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008524848,0.00051564147,0.001217033,0.00016948885,0.0000058985765,0.00022626643,0.00026107015,0.0008008465,0.0014020499,0.11337657,0.75026053,0.13167942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003143383,0.00017657592,0.0026715747,0.00013601662,0.0000039404576,0.00006401258,0.0006298231,0.00076563616,0.0011751404,0.028620953,0.96568143,0.00004357908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013531157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038340203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012295562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041880425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3961898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926567176","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516","title":"Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa; Jewish General Hospital; Institut du Savoir Montfort; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Law; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.9177965981725121,"score_gpt":0.7046737378033378,"score_spread":0.21312286036917438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926567176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.00014859744,0.0001062294,0.00040048233,0.0000050128106,0.000073649935,0.00023646145,0.0000035817154,0.0005274505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761057,0.0005451073,0.00059051637,0.00042756085,0.000024792473,0.00017926512,0.00023571643,0.000003541348,0.00038295085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948613,0.0024918537,0.0009103594,0.0002868887,0.0010261307,0.00042343113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95296687,0.017190501,0.019256847,0.0010352375,0.005365747,0.0041847625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008029214,0.00018790436,0.00043805814,0.0023223946,0.00089980813,0.0017891924,0.00048812974,0.0009866077,0.0016937082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034317214,0.00050069107,0.000422609,0.0017261559,0.0006861365,0.0022186106,0.0013984105,0.0007981848,0.0007064682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007778937,0.00032202635,0.96056527,0.000284087,0.00004252733,0.00028278548,0.026433133,0.000042491367,0.0005576159,0.000081696206,0.0006790752,0.010631614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003989459,0.0009190127,0.88451475,0.00032666317,0.000042821142,0.0011482687,0.107569896,0.00044466456,0.00046248097,0.00021143883,0.004260757,0.000059306418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014219378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019320467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99901336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006107288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015017535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042463005},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2927052045","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4764","title":"Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.49515394773640964,"score_gpt":0.5635849346576557,"score_spread":0.06843098692124605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927052045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852461,0.003690079,0.0009535876,0.0019531986,0.00004098922,0.000045170353,0.00023651551,0.000023473793,0.007810854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840933,0.00081159524,0.00037239044,0.0000900808,0.000047135967,0.000014211809,0.0000832344,0.000005253332,0.00016681822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96708876,0.010969628,0.004927365,0.0019032501,0.013948206,0.0011628544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6572225,0.20765081,0.10501923,0.009759413,0.016718565,0.0036295026],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018921126,0.00019736805,0.000466689,0.020572044,0.001834777,0.0059096487,0.00076388754,0.0009238022,0.002222716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17975892,0.00028382192,0.00035691075,0.023316763,0.0046493094,0.0074539236,0.0057133194,0.00093119044,0.00026163945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015387604,0.000040339753,0.9028412,0.0006651989,0.00023817769,0.0007055895,0.042122293,0.00010157016,0.0009110805,0.0033405218,0.0007629125,0.048117265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013591809,0.00011489771,0.9197,0.0007316822,0.00018075343,0.003057093,0.062456157,0.0006014304,0.00094641844,0.0035920467,0.008537675,0.00006822295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041672233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070218756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019870969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021637452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10006565},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2936735465","doi":"10.1111/jan.14010","title":"Increasing citations to your work","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Ulster University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Work (physics); MEDLINE; Psychology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.3840752540123307,"score_gpt":0.607925476350166,"score_spread":0.2238502223378353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936735465","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040967934,0.027542867,0.016147267,0.45131096,0.08149117,0.0017301644,0.003551738,0.0067745945,0.37048325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3141887,0.042268887,0.08134127,0.21124238,0.07929672,0.0032322826,0.005472508,0.004445648,0.25851166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95818067,0.013579687,0.0041027153,0.0027826412,0.018621879,0.002732462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74384034,0.07508162,0.023132611,0.018743098,0.09579006,0.04341234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028261572,0.0007390995,0.0011560561,0.009919353,0.004162325,0.013598853,0.0026197387,0.0063539413,0.1287185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27226633,0.0005526609,0.001743865,0.007359932,0.0019112081,0.011876472,0.012404242,0.0054129064,0.06684096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091988644,0.00023349703,0.005823223,0.002119365,0.00010166632,0.0001612383,0.0029200942,0.00006820264,0.000956917,0.009149102,0.6216636,0.35671118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013096663,0.0004371087,0.020032253,0.0022183387,0.0001690437,0.00063329365,0.0030168756,0.00015174338,0.0010570306,0.0144861145,0.95757335,0.00009388729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016662166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045073507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99008065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035171441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007981532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43060625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936767620","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.012","title":"Predatory Journals and Junk Meetings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing; Praise; Theme (computing); Medical education; Public relations; Library science; Law; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1529461951327008,"score_gpt":0.4460579922514006,"score_spread":0.2931117971186998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936767620","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016314475,0.023950089,0.002212975,0.19174379,0.5672123,0.00025715187,0.0011714399,0.002017468,0.2098034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01572379,0.018180903,0.0029812525,0.1522099,0.41421637,0.00042551596,0.0014011473,0.0039581605,0.39090297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548428,0.010968507,0.003942065,0.0032741714,0.024667567,0.0023049354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8139249,0.05053902,0.026028782,0.01614903,0.050302953,0.043055255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027083334,0.0022888866,0.0021032367,0.007926467,0.010122439,0.039149467,0.0036221708,0.008575839,0.24354829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14953777,0.0013576677,0.0012583187,0.008064314,0.006401525,0.019979428,0.014209502,0.010987456,0.19284207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005728175,0.00002397392,0.0001083661,0.00030302248,0.000014561886,0.00013495347,0.00035607675,0.000016889087,0.00012937505,0.005018758,0.97254634,0.021290356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151177555,0.000021011394,0.0002784308,0.00022364606,0.0000035502408,0.00011353942,0.00037555367,0.00002826996,0.00005918169,0.0026828428,0.99618334,0.000015401158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005292703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015573025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99142414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039664255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006748789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8147502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937701261","doi":"10.1590/2318-0889201931e190031","title":"Por métricas alternativas mais relevantes para a América Latina","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Transinformação","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4570872874979073,"score_gpt":0.5328393504066783,"score_spread":0.07575206290877101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937701261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5378749,0.022524726,0.030627212,0.017450485,0.0010923843,0.00039333056,0.014830189,0.0008206654,0.37438616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569088,0.0051761745,0.019151492,0.00060300407,0.00027986887,0.00041881195,0.004558517,0.00022093848,0.012682452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920129,0.0031825039,0.00091320934,0.0011257599,0.002262091,0.00050351396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98312646,0.0042207693,0.0031544326,0.001234335,0.0076595787,0.0006045264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076631657,0.0008189112,0.00070724223,0.010475658,0.0019709254,0.010823512,0.00076238066,0.0008598648,0.009055085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025705185,0.0001941813,0.00060176424,0.034796726,0.0025481076,0.0054783085,0.0032524418,0.0011595964,0.0012484215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003963396,0.00013247851,0.37459058,0.0025639087,0.00036387306,0.00051097356,0.050804842,0.002038926,0.004999582,0.16459809,0.026197774,0.37280273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034823785,0.00016204383,0.37786767,0.0015536008,0.00023554967,0.0005004991,0.09671461,0.0029492888,0.0017841395,0.056119315,0.46194082,0.00013767414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06073765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046188764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070667965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048589343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12076819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940242975","doi":"10.7554/elife.47338","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":358,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Impact factor; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Metric (unit); Political science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7993279418222892,"score_gpt":0.6616785678238986,"score_spread":0.1376493739983906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940242975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93089473,0.01589486,0.010384448,0.0054678903,0.00080648536,0.0011075309,0.0045807413,0.00050606794,0.030357216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98742664,0.0013661206,0.008345808,0.0002331916,0.00034506732,0.00041893704,0.0009281623,0.00006438359,0.00087177026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7471807,0.100661375,0.04446716,0.005902157,0.09734375,0.0044448692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24980032,0.41504782,0.17191696,0.02435546,0.12672561,0.012153858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22448884,0.0006901043,0.0027642378,0.06942866,0.002788214,0.008715391,0.0014424642,0.001143162,0.00133597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5862108,0.00036731857,0.0016029831,0.069005035,0.0026390424,0.008070488,0.0031697797,0.0015067762,0.000496039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059276965,0.00021658855,0.7766805,0.0015284907,0.0010254533,0.0001262727,0.004780483,0.00049723685,0.0004567508,0.002093164,0.004902663,0.20709951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007446793,0.00095320836,0.9711774,0.00088857656,0.00047526686,0.0003877062,0.005114253,0.0026237643,0.0009971892,0.00301162,0.014011171,0.0002853757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011967332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023122797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009059445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010955505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95634335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941300175","doi":"10.29173/cjs28794","title":"Internationalization of Polish Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Transformative Role of The Research Evaluation System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Variance (accounting); Transformative learning; Political science; Sociology; Ranking (information retrieval); Social science; Library science; Business; Pedagogy; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.775705695234815,"score_gpt":0.6293326447951026,"score_spread":0.14637305043971238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941300175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8536426,0.001965802,0.04068718,0.019191712,0.00053608284,0.0013160956,0.00032336914,0.0004985175,0.081838734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671013,0.00032856065,0.009385126,0.0005680826,0.00007296875,0.000310777,0.000088599816,0.000091879076,0.0024438722],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8198861,0.115082145,0.016971452,0.007556573,0.03370302,0.006800796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7600256,0.11856309,0.0365568,0.028773872,0.048673637,0.007407007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14749894,0.00051908044,0.00093030545,0.0072576776,0.006461022,0.019738222,0.0012525432,0.00085838314,0.0028328774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19274378,0.0006224313,0.0006366958,0.0075756595,0.008331491,0.008383735,0.009322207,0.0021417232,0.0004950402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071010325,0.00048217893,0.16036455,0.0019154511,0.0002751546,0.00057761767,0.15712245,0.0029508437,0.011108903,0.14282723,0.008724275,0.51294124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028075956,0.0011430698,0.39108616,0.0015340308,0.00035515137,0.0006074403,0.21238674,0.010222335,0.03021208,0.07888173,0.272744,0.0005465318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00854905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007619876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012428747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024526337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78005826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942862229","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1817431116","title":"Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Reputation; Prestige; Meritocracy; Work (physics); Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Economic growth; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.22771113812672306,"score_gpt":0.4715653185338999,"score_spread":0.24385418040717682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942862229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892503,0.00006157062,0.00011884765,0.00006420919,0.000004330479,0.000004880064,0.0000350144,0.0000035847627,0.00078261166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.000023552493,0.0000842096,0.000013661512,0.0000054294287,0.0000052466676,0.00002757307,0.00000196842,0.00023521214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820364,0.00072497013,0.00007528449,0.00029721094,0.0002993364,0.00039943066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98502237,0.005915008,0.0031569218,0.00082178664,0.00063782063,0.0044460376],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017968,0.00020869456,0.00030098343,0.0009275162,0.0010858057,0.002048741,0.00047624024,0.00058179186,0.004351849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013136506,0.00017911146,0.00030619025,0.0007771075,0.0011425692,0.00087594456,0.0021118964,0.000541073,0.00034631236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005799962,0.0005151779,0.9824124,0.00002697625,0.00007911555,0.00013469679,0.0013027271,0.00054404396,0.0020205397,0.0005164298,0.00017476751,0.011693189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010325872,0.00024575734,0.9978593,0.0000054681373,0.000012438013,0.00002744636,0.00088041316,0.0003622481,0.0001836079,0.00022299193,0.00018547958,0.0000045864276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045455033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057459925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006640953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091447955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014558375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942872290","doi":"10.1002/asi.24316","title":"Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Disadvantage; Promotion (chess); Citation impact; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Political science; Gender inequality; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.23169804307012667,"score_gpt":0.5053245853907983,"score_spread":0.27362654232067163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942872290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98989224,0.0015536229,0.000037934624,0.0003586326,0.00003201198,0.000006504677,0.0033929714,0.000007877606,0.0047182837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963052,0.0005501303,0.00006997124,0.00003019165,0.000023673188,0.000008546505,0.0017249101,0.0000058198116,0.001281639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937075,0.00010244094,0.00009706631,0.00012791534,0.00016883972,0.0001330618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99172133,0.0019342466,0.0032537414,0.00038305335,0.00202804,0.00067961926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016212673,0.00016966827,0.00036025845,0.0053316867,0.0005055826,0.0015687646,0.00021156135,0.00026629196,0.0025217421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008577461,0.00007177261,0.00022857706,0.007817039,0.00036313751,0.00086587947,0.0009381513,0.0002485268,0.00040681366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003334969,0.000028541108,0.9600399,0.0002929826,0.00016160635,0.00034325698,0.0046519507,0.00015365727,0.0009285956,0.0007334298,0.0023527988,0.029979799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024213603,0.000017148719,0.99528474,0.00003608906,0.000027855325,0.0000656424,0.0016696006,0.000058338148,0.00016849405,0.00006177128,0.0026021653,0.000005769014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026994726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041570097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99837875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077716116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007643094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053675234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943045807","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1234","title":"Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Action research; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.8807511459485838,"score_gpt":0.6990082681212841,"score_spread":0.1817428778272997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943045807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451691,0.01025203,0.0023024406,0.013263164,0.00021954761,0.00010428297,0.0049786055,0.00017249951,0.023538332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924273,0.0019158799,0.0018097899,0.00049294916,0.00037780838,0.00003442825,0.001389489,0.000096705146,0.0014557694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98590523,0.004726706,0.002597265,0.0018639067,0.003803982,0.0011029162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6986609,0.15551734,0.09534099,0.009775799,0.02957543,0.011129529],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014167942,0.00023898766,0.0007849262,0.022491643,0.0015584684,0.009211837,0.001237605,0.0014227661,0.01556835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10974205,0.00030029955,0.00053862727,0.038421102,0.0018334403,0.007868978,0.0031873067,0.0009706158,0.0036584765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043872773,0.00008556844,0.9095816,0.00072106963,0.00023200829,0.00025566661,0.0061617186,0.00013692955,0.0013387364,0.003383402,0.0055201636,0.07214447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018715791,0.00007789372,0.9718766,0.00047016845,0.00007440153,0.00087017677,0.009505774,0.00040320016,0.00049274403,0.005583181,0.0105645405,0.00006254979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011928657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017578739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98583204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010598016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00154729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074928164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943180993","doi":"10.1111/mec.15063","title":"Some perspective on <i>Molecular Ecology</i> perspectives: Are women being left out?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09486146695937771,"score_gpt":0.4707250548417846,"score_spread":0.3758635878824069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943180993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055064075,0.040489897,0.0022100462,0.90674615,0.018168768,0.0000138620635,0.00019355779,0.00005219931,0.026619079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18987624,0.075362876,0.0026423384,0.6711394,0.029081557,0.000091193324,0.00023569576,0.00040357167,0.031167028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801902,0.01184804,0.00082013855,0.0025456476,0.002635704,0.0019601895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94224644,0.029384002,0.005638221,0.0025752801,0.009989131,0.010166943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027763769,0.0009175198,0.0011144525,0.0019920375,0.009730823,0.014892289,0.002029029,0.0076838695,0.023756914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05502863,0.00060665363,0.0011225733,0.0021854504,0.020241437,0.023369994,0.0063062645,0.009595313,0.0070630936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032893778,0.00007871486,0.017809967,0.0023339523,0.00015694786,0.001603653,0.116563775,0.000067411725,0.0011179197,0.12881482,0.5454298,0.1856941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018460629,0.00007497869,0.0027704574,0.0027590906,0.00005213109,0.0009933262,0.06410917,0.000028191844,0.0003289537,0.028600551,0.90020365,0.000060980845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01109001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01710761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056680995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010469121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14683062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943373442","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2019.1608615","title":"A responsibility to commercialize? Tracing academic researchers’ evolving engagement with the commercialization of biomedical research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commercialization; Ambivalence; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Marketing; Business; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7522981823481073,"score_gpt":0.6398383169243247,"score_spread":0.11245986542378261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943373442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570514,0.0010891,0.0028418216,0.02414779,0.00008980244,0.00005901284,0.000019195626,0.000019018818,0.014682807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750334,0.00044820504,0.00060254347,0.00081714516,0.000024611767,0.00002201231,0.000008287208,0.0000070345773,0.0005668467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90752524,0.06816457,0.003302065,0.002700247,0.0127538415,0.005554032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7205257,0.19372654,0.035482705,0.008192938,0.021709373,0.020362752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091872446,0.0002628313,0.00050370925,0.0037700152,0.011024337,0.021600796,0.002330832,0.0048886943,0.0013471922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17901643,0.00062159303,0.00044058004,0.0044673155,0.021051463,0.011506772,0.011319335,0.0070946417,0.00028146405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009320277,0.000108449734,0.03962487,0.0001464269,0.000033206023,0.0007140474,0.9104002,0.00012501048,0.0015962879,0.027878834,0.0015202434,0.017759217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019234963,0.00008574442,0.013330274,0.00017273257,0.000013899579,0.0005321784,0.9479402,0.000579503,0.0007698797,0.007936759,0.028559806,0.000059790673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004871882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050917077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98897564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102674635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015730714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48587376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944222473","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.19414","title":"7. Quand les citoyens québécois font la science","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.17325012290152625,"score_gpt":0.3635988124241847,"score_spread":0.19034868952265843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944222473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006491945,0.024106734,0.0013026232,0.038394704,0.0016929719,0.000041510102,0.00043503588,0.00008939928,0.92744493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11210326,0.015803674,0.0018126742,0.006966414,0.00042288465,0.00007634177,0.00034099264,0.0000851589,0.8623887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00016996192,0.000040148614,0.00020238294,0.00060611125,0.00031059538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899155,0.00015842672,0.000053528634,0.000057906356,0.000591751,0.00014688158],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918361,0.0006438534,0.00041907406,0.0026457931,0.009657375,0.010948145,0.0008161001,0.0036429411,0.028967852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016961851,0.00035316206,0.0004693971,0.003606131,0.008026594,0.0052765664,0.0014478072,0.0029466054,0.0058828453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025443713,0.000014850446,0.0009166072,0.00015170715,0.00001177953,0.00019475925,0.008397351,0.00012473592,0.00054455665,0.83110684,0.1138922,0.04461919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051648067,0.000005300084,0.001684181,0.00022247671,0.000010375142,0.00007986981,0.002220516,0.000077499855,0.00017875925,0.012180817,0.9833182,0.000016714803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88228667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.945693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040377483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03614224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29296052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945259118","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03120-0","title":"Identifying emerging scholars: seeing through the crystal ball of scholarship selection committees","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Percentage point; Competition (biology); Psychology; Point (geometry); Selection (genetic algorithm); Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.5381788305996781,"score_gpt":0.5673536692852789,"score_spread":0.02917483868560078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945259118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46135178,0.005516664,0.13479385,0.10345023,0.0038342865,0.0013062166,0.0020734482,0.00089979166,0.28677374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091627,0.0014545087,0.041506972,0.003543493,0.0009744969,0.0005430279,0.0011882513,0.0004555977,0.041171033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696704,0.015060917,0.001437579,0.0024370847,0.008974949,0.0024191155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87737614,0.059105914,0.011118845,0.008608853,0.033112746,0.010677476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03195272,0.0004970223,0.0021194385,0.01013451,0.010842192,0.01712346,0.0027914762,0.0032422906,0.018938491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18135944,0.0007948773,0.0006555604,0.008907771,0.006694509,0.013188888,0.010301696,0.0035272143,0.004689581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012135076,0.00028896803,0.088393934,0.0008298056,0.00014682056,0.0008982535,0.027821442,0.003050701,0.0019455471,0.37261984,0.19117747,0.31161368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022839522,0.00038720912,0.043960184,0.0010131788,0.000115061725,0.00078271446,0.07182003,0.031750448,0.003214146,0.5450954,0.30139953,0.00023377156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022311082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027887607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003959529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01017933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16898417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945263934","doi":"10.1111/petr.13455","title":"Publication trends in pediatric renal transplantation: Bibliometric analysis of literature from 1950 to 2017","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pediatric Transplantation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Markham Stouffville Hospital; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Transplantation; Science Citation Index; Citation; Index (typography); Observational study; MEDLINE; Retrospective cohort study; Citation analysis; Internal medicine; Demography; Library science","score_opus":0.18926390724222622,"score_gpt":0.47469290173080453,"score_spread":0.2854289944885783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945263934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6568315,0.19060302,0.0020225435,0.0024946157,0.00032361218,0.00026973663,0.13554849,0.00056259695,0.011343884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85576016,0.08470224,0.0034431675,0.00026399968,0.0006538879,0.00040256756,0.05350907,0.00009217777,0.0011727016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911617,0.0012289662,0.0030593784,0.0009872614,0.0031586045,0.00040393922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95382005,0.016660444,0.018615639,0.0014001625,0.008581494,0.00092215673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058896644,0.0006166917,0.0015280574,0.111845315,0.00072363584,0.003880816,0.0008183858,0.0005073473,0.0029766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039415196,0.00029646204,0.0024537935,0.16741934,0.00055863964,0.0026111694,0.001540443,0.0004948702,0.0009424525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031746484,0.00005018996,0.86405474,0.012001319,0.003012837,0.0004924333,0.0013155484,0.0012627766,0.00073706364,0.0010289333,0.010370871,0.10535583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022227627,0.00007159636,0.9663064,0.0023412728,0.0016200233,0.0012434395,0.0013306962,0.001207395,0.00055341824,0.0008630657,0.02438736,0.00005308795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057617323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005401787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99411035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019686662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003337489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031147897},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2945705835","doi":"10.7202/1058719ar","title":"Usage et diffusion des revues savantes québécoises en sciences sociales et humaines : analyse des téléchargements de la plateforme Érudit","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.620234506676485,"score_gpt":0.5916260167964514,"score_spread":0.028608489880033616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945705835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87233645,0.020273203,0.0021592218,0.012157142,0.0005097606,0.0007167145,0.0055276235,0.00019585104,0.086123936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94613713,0.011338361,0.0028841158,0.001643369,0.0001494425,0.0006265024,0.0019510998,0.00014089321,0.03512902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612773,0.0037039274,0.0011952319,0.0011374785,0.0064811427,0.0013544618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8759331,0.04336402,0.010292518,0.0046416353,0.058420684,0.007348113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016983088,0.00043515055,0.0010488488,0.015945656,0.0048600202,0.009492005,0.0014253292,0.0014411164,0.010262682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054830067,0.00037433303,0.00077544345,0.028067335,0.0034263446,0.004623609,0.0034795713,0.0016862763,0.0014297644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056061154,0.0002763706,0.3158917,0.00639825,0.0005097188,0.0013158419,0.22694845,0.0005873895,0.006058969,0.019819489,0.025770165,0.3958631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000326456,0.00024081425,0.5613501,0.0033527622,0.00024414787,0.0003075931,0.15483299,0.00045259894,0.0020086973,0.0008920378,0.27614397,0.00014156335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56746083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67046744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026941393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04989404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.870173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945867950","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v5i2.354","title":"“Showcase” vs. “Selective” Undergraduate Research Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Publishing; Undergraduate research; Institution; Medical education; Public relations; Higher education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.39995610308171475,"score_gpt":0.5071250470435879,"score_spread":0.1071689439618731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945867950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14625625,0.032327704,0.024824183,0.08086646,0.06307096,0.0016203162,0.006048844,0.004098948,0.64088637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70422614,0.028484724,0.052642796,0.03319086,0.050837997,0.0022720047,0.005583481,0.0023340932,0.12042785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97358614,0.008169686,0.0040920777,0.0016304449,0.010261468,0.0022601467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8386887,0.0472363,0.03400298,0.019943459,0.032374285,0.027754307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0176372,0.00046695422,0.00061304495,0.006639999,0.0026918421,0.018055674,0.0019629735,0.002835199,0.033187855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09147843,0.00038116708,0.0005904734,0.011686035,0.0044406764,0.008160377,0.0063982224,0.0021808126,0.013451009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011407102,0.00044068752,0.012876557,0.007503657,0.00013579881,0.0006121025,0.009998155,0.00034837626,0.010377038,0.15360995,0.45013902,0.35281795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103891914,0.00056799746,0.027983269,0.0020134512,0.000075106436,0.0016976574,0.007299532,0.00041519015,0.003481414,0.016684808,0.93958044,0.00009728083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043469018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093427865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018040059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004641306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1110245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945890780","doi":"10.3390/publications7020035","title":"Did the Research Faculty at a Small Canadian Business School Publish in “Predatory” Venues? This Depends on the Publishing Blacklist","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Blacklist; Publication; Blacklisting; Library science; Advertising; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.729418124703528,"score_gpt":0.5529345160335923,"score_spread":0.17648360866993562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945890780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694585,0.006028239,0.0009846534,0.030258475,0.0003804772,0.00012855412,0.0016039042,0.00004550514,0.09111159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911056,0.0018931731,0.0002575335,0.0023969342,0.00014313341,0.000027828266,0.00033794373,0.000025537236,0.0038122581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832312,0.002663512,0.00082162645,0.0011217971,0.009640573,0.0025213202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9014278,0.03696159,0.026353665,0.0046202904,0.021630706,0.00900595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103241755,0.00030979633,0.00045042485,0.004805247,0.009122737,0.013657947,0.0013353786,0.0015624779,0.0071979607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0686819,0.00031368792,0.00034933168,0.010783057,0.007861834,0.0066559296,0.0028514438,0.0015726134,0.0011264017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023169807,0.0001333972,0.78906006,0.00064651127,0.00019361444,0.00062115735,0.09465305,0.00015633328,0.000647782,0.020621859,0.019524757,0.073509805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027199423,0.000078527955,0.77482486,0.00075614726,0.0001405134,0.00025092927,0.1529385,0.0002669483,0.0008887625,0.005204522,0.06452498,0.000098066754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5876954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7001668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018497497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031388693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82946545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945894199","doi":"10.1037/amp0000480","title":"The publication gender gap in psychology.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Scientific communication; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6825347326650658,"score_gpt":0.6538147044674287,"score_spread":0.028720028197637082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945894199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80740225,0.09933823,0.003441543,0.016901955,0.0016167827,0.00011102235,0.016426057,0.00015140045,0.05461072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978574,0.011625385,0.0013642923,0.0010885326,0.00072913687,0.000064939304,0.0025785365,0.000034963105,0.003940269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905261,0.0026531888,0.0014081415,0.0012934481,0.0034412998,0.00067785376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91219586,0.04382274,0.031731527,0.003951384,0.0053140307,0.0029844996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011017175,0.00022838273,0.0005023511,0.011308433,0.0016171302,0.0039572767,0.0004920827,0.0006159545,0.0065157455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05463211,0.00013305056,0.00040612917,0.020930843,0.0016212658,0.0037248326,0.0025931369,0.0005123824,0.0015270873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021490632,0.000042871266,0.76725435,0.0011959907,0.00020552886,0.00046404894,0.012746064,0.00015555037,0.0006382085,0.018107476,0.015305916,0.18366924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118347325,0.000116188574,0.9042471,0.00086381246,0.000107116866,0.0011674059,0.012659763,0.00026467015,0.000622079,0.013500719,0.06640953,0.000029966111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024093038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006044845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012715686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028194082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05826509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947490211","doi":"","title":"Croissance modeste des publications scientifiques au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.6594708204162364,"score_gpt":0.5778470048534264,"score_spread":0.08162381556280995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947490211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41493165,0.11163438,0.0046850415,0.0981632,0.006592765,0.00019424495,0.037247606,0.0020552967,0.32449576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80683154,0.032841336,0.0027574191,0.0023942895,0.001599306,0.000087386405,0.005091807,0.00031894006,0.14807798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881953,0.0009000035,0.0004838547,0.001151677,0.0074207676,0.0018483346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95634717,0.0059583737,0.002382612,0.0011437524,0.02997576,0.0041922275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005362444,0.0008776184,0.0013526537,0.014657338,0.0056424923,0.013204438,0.0011582441,0.0015772869,0.015747542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029880999,0.0005061091,0.001124767,0.019236768,0.00286905,0.0021224995,0.0014991916,0.0032521526,0.002445937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029660957,0.00017046781,0.13364057,0.00269724,0.00096155825,0.0013729528,0.0070497803,0.0058793593,0.008595801,0.15641542,0.20152897,0.4787217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016488961,0.00010336483,0.4327423,0.00063907146,0.0002270335,0.00032534712,0.00261301,0.002103261,0.0028716463,0.0035283037,0.5545664,0.00011536338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99463755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1157483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18313718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83981663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948845587","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Mentorship; Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6652650663412806,"score_gpt":0.638300049848536,"score_spread":0.02696501649274452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948845587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97666806,0.00034853755,0.002452559,0.006757701,0.0001378233,0.00009554237,0.00001944852,0.000019117479,0.013501257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985592,0.00007281075,0.0004950899,0.00033385697,0.00003162587,0.00004731347,0.00000975157,0.000007995304,0.00044228463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80366296,0.14733717,0.0144187845,0.0038742586,0.023350932,0.0073558884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38009593,0.44678137,0.07572265,0.011771274,0.04745822,0.038170546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109976396,0.00033484504,0.00064795377,0.0063716406,0.01075801,0.016050529,0.0014962956,0.003157456,0.0034175422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36728528,0.00052073214,0.0007490277,0.0034737266,0.009673578,0.0063631455,0.010911382,0.004165993,0.00037736315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063887436,0.00078026403,0.27917027,0.00033548145,0.00022365217,0.0007755169,0.6527548,0.0005112282,0.001499464,0.018242365,0.0025946172,0.04247343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623688,0.00046360973,0.10687008,0.0005310185,0.00010941833,0.00085471,0.85502124,0.0021048235,0.0010434369,0.019270385,0.013318298,0.00015062233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002863407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035529549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99684256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007151499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124559505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5816177},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2949196191","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1205.4328","title":"The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers' citations in the digital age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Relation (database); Information Age; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data mining; Physics","score_opus":0.7498797872388095,"score_gpt":0.4467508787489213,"score_spread":0.30312890848988827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949196191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529299,0.028586183,0.005096592,0.013871377,0.0008524894,0.000044057313,0.0024425872,0.00019490995,0.09598188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686194,0.0054403255,0.0007298374,0.00059661595,0.0008145485,0.000012811799,0.00069207745,0.00003227232,0.004819482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700576,0.0005273284,0.00039217778,0.00050015043,0.0011951529,0.00037939465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408023,0.028194029,0.016830575,0.0028088407,0.0070177973,0.004346449],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039888006,0.00030275396,0.0006077005,0.008312626,0.00092732266,0.0041487017,0.0005526701,0.00119757,0.01022266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051878057,0.00014514514,0.00055267196,0.015430543,0.0017164138,0.0055836914,0.0026724671,0.0014410287,0.0028128764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065619766,0.0002159556,0.79919225,0.00096999895,0.0004885813,0.00050127576,0.0026435072,0.0014295714,0.0020208207,0.030997477,0.008625651,0.15225871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045339068,0.0002986315,0.9301431,0.00019940345,0.00028289206,0.0006871214,0.0019804114,0.000996987,0.0016396858,0.030803785,0.032855373,0.00006728074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033277755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027059484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011334475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012774098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034198225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949583693","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468","title":"A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; European Commission","keywords":"Medicine; Peer review; Protocol (science); Process (computing); Medical education; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9312511098149691,"score_gpt":0.7778857900751988,"score_spread":0.1533653197397703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949583693","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096061156,0.0011665638,0.0049794186,0.00070122443,0.0003946261,0.9887074,0.0015351664,0.00017328009,0.0013816591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009310128,0.0009985717,0.0147740515,0.00030280635,0.00006725319,0.98199284,0.00044979056,0.000021022715,0.000462772],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.75872445,0.11709755,0.09390294,0.0104326,0.015102568,0.0047399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6553193,0.13339992,0.04973663,0.031771738,0.12025359,0.009518788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31770965,0.006289154,0.011145816,0.025030727,0.008928519,0.009296152,0.0070662145,0.012023454,0.05227067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.251471,0.0060750283,0.010945223,0.019502802,0.0077324645,0.01583083,0.012389618,0.008771934,0.021521116],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013260756,0.0014191257,0.003247366,0.5736725,0.001625016,0.0019336763,0.03650573,0.0016162589,0.0057493863,0.015085918,0.11291712,0.23296718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022696044,0.0045414865,0.010593409,0.39747772,0.0033351064,0.0012411257,0.018018577,0.002412762,0.005538203,0.02676471,0.50634336,0.001037488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028686612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083349785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6822903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015325627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110611945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949716378","doi":"10.1098/rsos.171511","title":"Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Incentive; Publication; Publish or perish; Public trust; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Publishing; Social psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5007204611956686,"score_gpt":0.557571533408018,"score_spread":0.05685107221234942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949716378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89723325,0.00066703575,0.066857964,0.010666303,0.00010226612,0.0004707179,0.0007985116,0.00016664033,0.023037245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344265,0.00020703381,0.003816382,0.00009821485,0.000031548705,0.000103800965,0.000094066745,0.000014930506,0.002191427],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263084,0.0043931617,0.0003637919,0.0009995201,0.00073999655,0.0008727501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84831965,0.11483296,0.022898272,0.005938657,0.004547143,0.0034633325],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016531285,0.00087174523,0.0009867422,0.0024607258,0.0015643442,0.0058747185,0.0016217476,0.0038719391,0.0064594797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14039715,0.00077251723,0.00108457,0.0020732721,0.0043859,0.0049934704,0.0032605985,0.0023448328,0.00088945386],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011202204,0.00053571345,0.1252707,0.0005425909,0.0004409847,0.0014224853,0.007913522,0.5212603,0.0014993122,0.3057843,0.0037138674,0.030496005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002916145,0.00050803233,0.020455074,0.00015372134,0.00023085663,0.00033403587,0.002195512,0.72120357,0.00040489406,0.25044534,0.0036465202,0.00013078126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017085373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008198127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062731267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035877323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08742684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949765072","doi":"10.1111/jeb.13497","title":"Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Diversity (politics); Relevance (law); Biology; Ideal (ethics); Science policy; Constructive; Perspective (graphical); Variation (astronomy); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Computer science; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.6039572518410571,"score_gpt":0.5908085345514162,"score_spread":0.013148717289640843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949765072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08433345,0.011027781,0.017036898,0.8127939,0.00092281844,0.00007979689,0.00029304347,0.00006247985,0.0734498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506263,0.005974528,0.006997212,0.03226683,0.0009844133,0.00015561975,0.00008295258,0.000049242448,0.0028629259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9337525,0.043288246,0.0038068763,0.0030809331,0.008715689,0.0073557636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88002944,0.07961521,0.012250175,0.0041364143,0.01780905,0.006159696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08369805,0.00042401024,0.0012007304,0.007126292,0.005471895,0.019670593,0.002568216,0.0065166,0.0031841919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16470343,0.00043440703,0.0007668885,0.010275749,0.018398412,0.016192522,0.004723991,0.005362434,0.00047148348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013729103,0.000068129724,0.014885827,0.0004048444,0.00010895907,0.00012597836,0.0061521064,0.0038321,0.0005009183,0.9041093,0.012243205,0.05743142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010655087,0.000114261056,0.039654028,0.0014885223,0.00010954937,0.00017565946,0.017599251,0.0039902427,0.0010683547,0.74339193,0.19214337,0.0001583075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011973874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91630197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018251253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021180877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44264287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949884440","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0218309","title":"Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universidad de Granada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation impact; Citation; Political science; Science policy; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.8752949591281289,"score_gpt":0.5393694433420769,"score_spread":0.335925515786052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949884440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693462,0.0019464638,0.0012804919,0.005272973,0.00009690114,0.000032452772,0.00020853401,0.000015987813,0.021799972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988594,0.0002623299,0.00015690332,0.00010298364,0.000048523285,0.000011878709,0.000060138784,0.0000037871278,0.0004939204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893289,0.005897498,0.00058324577,0.00093391247,0.0018509483,0.0014055177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80773115,0.12458521,0.033288576,0.0035883975,0.00967784,0.02112882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015195918,0.00029860198,0.0005856242,0.0036479034,0.0016463216,0.003996423,0.00075832015,0.00092457014,0.0075113736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07910118,0.00011972227,0.00053641084,0.0069075827,0.0027936099,0.0031870657,0.0038414667,0.0017690513,0.0010032529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026705925,0.00036602432,0.95570815,0.00013469008,0.00026509265,0.00021701328,0.006071505,0.0006212026,0.00013904672,0.0063811378,0.0012340888,0.028595055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085928456,0.00038030054,0.9650645,0.00023822558,0.0002574983,0.00018177164,0.01589698,0.0016832802,0.000347595,0.011685445,0.0041379873,0.000040327664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037849648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043110615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017702534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025622682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080364645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950319932","doi":"10.1002/asi.21011","title":"The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Index (typography); Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Social science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.17239204800978397,"score_gpt":0.5127840449258592,"score_spread":0.3403919969160752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950319932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448151,0.019655263,0.0005894788,0.0033772711,0.00032320418,0.000015095297,0.014674864,0.00010906815,0.016440647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792342,0.0054105707,0.000420541,0.0005293305,0.0007596387,0.000015566675,0.009959124,0.000024274847,0.003646937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.00010555174,0.00016295903,0.00025951926,0.0005528739,0.0001315935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98382485,0.0031116216,0.005351934,0.00038872592,0.0065475134,0.0007753679],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025419826,0.00021526692,0.00048257754,0.009093158,0.00043573146,0.00264134,0.0006876997,0.00081694784,0.001967239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013831527,0.00012155105,0.0003118918,0.01321248,0.0007467783,0.001725373,0.0010469346,0.00075106364,0.0009275422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092716824,0.00016420051,0.7979138,0.0015008104,0.0004707596,0.0006809506,0.0048454837,0.0015928645,0.002919745,0.010604889,0.039862797,0.13851658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014914297,0.00009089246,0.96725297,0.00013323173,0.000053030355,0.0003121544,0.0006891186,0.00035516944,0.0013187239,0.00034227234,0.029418219,0.000019361887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020229114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013592312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99090683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028565123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013918517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040222704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950560487","doi":"10.1101/323519","title":"Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Publication; Currency; Creativity; Library science; Productivity; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.33668925938203803,"score_gpt":0.4782543302946712,"score_spread":0.14156507091263315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950560487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99332315,0.0010097486,0.0005006834,0.0005534021,0.000051484873,0.000048735226,0.0012523413,0.000014883433,0.0032456245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968766,0.00059401477,0.0009806232,0.00011822495,0.000052814907,0.000092587914,0.0007636435,0.000014948847,0.0005065963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888109,0.003165243,0.0023670609,0.0008732347,0.0038042024,0.0009793876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86604905,0.060484458,0.035072472,0.0038763436,0.02687099,0.0076467255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014464625,0.0002493918,0.0006477658,0.010815025,0.0012971931,0.0033121693,0.0008047194,0.0011822005,0.0027644353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09159589,0.00019029407,0.00057006977,0.0105887875,0.0009387696,0.0026523026,0.0034229336,0.0008415478,0.000855698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121464254,0.00011463333,0.9635602,0.00037907058,0.00011981696,0.000102154765,0.0063441102,0.00013466206,0.00032660048,0.00062691915,0.0021399003,0.026030343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034418736,0.00019667309,0.9566481,0.00040989646,0.00011551488,0.00047518537,0.030012356,0.0009201226,0.00060633675,0.0016903515,0.008826486,0.000064480504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014061353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016547329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007423098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010822708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0764972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950659211","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0810.1426","title":"Modeling a Century of Citation Distributions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Environmental science; Library science","score_opus":0.7395991497083269,"score_gpt":0.5638645344195722,"score_spread":0.17573461528875467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950659211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7292802,0.0045324843,0.22408457,0.0115930345,0.00042942484,0.00017583453,0.004886205,0.001126955,0.023891367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702851,0.0020587891,0.014725788,0.0005140135,0.000358455,0.00023562425,0.001419165,0.00019929545,0.010203771],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984377,0.00056790246,0.00008321082,0.00056249456,0.00019617875,0.00015249464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98626685,0.009192412,0.0018095227,0.0011123974,0.0010051494,0.00061359524],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005736224,0.0005609738,0.0009947745,0.0039737625,0.0010884352,0.004249025,0.0018208027,0.0031262925,0.005497879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04320098,0.00080157584,0.0010452813,0.004891529,0.0017023163,0.007271395,0.0020742577,0.002634375,0.0011986803],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002519507,0.00017455677,0.044322327,0.00023146771,0.00022740022,0.0005639557,0.002490951,0.57702607,0.0007611184,0.31868553,0.010172868,0.045091745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044908164,0.000036362537,0.007242949,0.00005243401,0.000043899505,0.00020070301,0.00022889372,0.80089545,0.00016005652,0.17998326,0.011068024,0.00004301963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011469344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006180761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030781135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011106371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03033638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950851292","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1705.03258","title":"Measuring Social Media Activity of Scientific Literature: An Exhaustive Comparison of Scopus and Novel Altmetrics Big Data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Altmetrics; Social media; Citation; Negative binomial distribution; Count data; Computer science; Statistics; Information retrieval; Data science; Library science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.9146932420703743,"score_gpt":0.47829983008480353,"score_spread":0.43639341198557074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950851292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743472,0.013310895,0.011246241,0.0014578935,0.0002695023,0.00044183523,0.06672471,0.0013665237,0.030835195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89518857,0.006140623,0.021866217,0.00029580278,0.0007228997,0.0006989526,0.071498826,0.00017069082,0.0034174717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924119,0.0011390732,0.0015631459,0.00062200206,0.003943944,0.00031996114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580119,0.016641002,0.013875446,0.0024114843,0.00755441,0.0015058286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055894344,0.0007127492,0.00079966435,0.043530047,0.0006790102,0.0036010102,0.0006903885,0.00059372484,0.0016155067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030353121,0.00018860243,0.0009236187,0.04860565,0.00051654695,0.0033642873,0.00211974,0.00038780223,0.0009271385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038048133,0.00029988628,0.731192,0.004677662,0.000813154,0.0006813115,0.0016462717,0.0021355916,0.004742617,0.00390099,0.012278627,0.23725139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031720392,0.000417898,0.9365036,0.00092035334,0.00044006848,0.00125668,0.0029001178,0.008839788,0.0042807814,0.0038036932,0.04049889,0.00010639334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001675905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040244213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006026217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013319072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029560149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950927168","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0808.2517","title":"Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of Nominees and Winners of the Chemistry and Physics Prizes (1901-2007)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Hierarchy; Attribution; Field (mathematics); Fragmentation (computing); Centrality; Scientific progress; Data science; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3440724253615619,"score_gpt":0.4528800998423715,"score_spread":0.10880767448080958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950927168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818286,0.0035114635,0.0017112935,0.004169262,0.00010019726,0.00002340451,0.0020970623,0.000053488297,0.006505225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575484,0.0011947552,0.00067285437,0.00014786824,0.00018645932,0.000016365186,0.0014922787,0.000020709644,0.0005138284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961591,0.0010102489,0.00050016027,0.00061137846,0.0012295906,0.00048954255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640671,0.013739238,0.012030133,0.0024342302,0.0057234946,0.0020058323],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010137338,0.00024835698,0.00096339354,0.016043473,0.0008178837,0.0037291683,0.00071204855,0.00087195745,0.0014785785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06665087,0.00019772668,0.00044439055,0.022941248,0.0008163327,0.0043193363,0.0015680186,0.0008029489,0.0010828226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021838346,0.00006653958,0.8969795,0.00028791343,0.00032863987,0.0001316273,0.0028924737,0.0014573081,0.00040440535,0.0052950764,0.006204946,0.08573311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001873704,0.000051612165,0.9756198,0.00017722718,0.00009452819,0.00017043854,0.0033890596,0.0025281538,0.0005611895,0.0067225466,0.010623778,0.000042891927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006974247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008098735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011421132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012532228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053611994},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2951578548","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0184601","title":"The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operationalization; Listing (finance); Order (exchange); Period (music); Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Business","score_opus":0.8699690257526101,"score_gpt":0.6014741051212934,"score_spread":0.26849492063131675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951578548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693485,0.005138152,0.008392488,0.0035583794,0.00027314606,0.00009256416,0.0006572185,0.000039339724,0.012500161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964121,0.0006124001,0.001990779,0.00016919497,0.00010556393,0.00006419982,0.00016637133,0.000018736278,0.0004606224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95949745,0.020296713,0.00707,0.004172855,0.006890007,0.002073025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5594194,0.2700305,0.12278963,0.015941799,0.015865741,0.015952876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031420168,0.00041089926,0.0007390804,0.0078045814,0.003353941,0.0065413807,0.001854554,0.0014570617,0.006236491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25826243,0.00038110424,0.0006015816,0.013432507,0.00401509,0.008771477,0.007953334,0.0016477369,0.0012234248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045186884,0.00006516471,0.9300313,0.00037723134,0.000094421586,0.00044174958,0.02813256,0.00020375231,0.00023867314,0.0053268885,0.0016052458,0.03303113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016380486,0.00046090555,0.8159166,0.0024890434,0.00033715717,0.0040888856,0.10784791,0.0035875835,0.0011409948,0.041988157,0.021833532,0.00014551291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024359387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031349638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018042936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044831866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16616774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951610038","doi":"10.1002/asi.21226","title":"On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mainstream; Discipline; Citation analysis; Scientific literature; Citation impact; Social science; Web of science; Impact factor; Interdisciplinarity; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Biology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3476440658245774,"score_gpt":0.5528947962903014,"score_spread":0.20525073046572395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951610038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97004414,0.0044605103,0.005278264,0.001353885,0.00004038203,0.000050821553,0.00025257672,0.000060642342,0.018458731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894744,0.0003331104,0.00037271212,0.000029018116,0.000038471546,0.000011291753,0.000059501293,0.00001118763,0.00019737963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97318316,0.014103987,0.0017330218,0.0016406309,0.00818014,0.0011591101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46694857,0.4415276,0.049612474,0.011273866,0.01945457,0.011182924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025169533,0.00042684865,0.0011482555,0.009932474,0.0011379919,0.0045682536,0.0010243616,0.0010297582,0.004549708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18907203,0.00027986124,0.0011352678,0.01425029,0.0028216196,0.004020276,0.004831831,0.002372579,0.000913562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000354316,0.00027536537,0.95647967,0.00016928969,0.00095714733,0.0002575755,0.00070541474,0.0046323556,0.00045446638,0.00416041,0.00034441618,0.031209497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039094677,0.00024790643,0.97688496,0.00009012213,0.0002739767,0.000263416,0.0008087723,0.0058026738,0.0007155908,0.013611131,0.0011941036,0.00006819189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001940735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011816561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99006754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015756576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012930317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13311082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951985723","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.6460","title":"Are elite journals declining?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Prestige; Excellence; Elite; Citation; Impact factor; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Hierarchy; Citation impact; Library science; Public relations; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8043521640401432,"score_gpt":0.46234284725115,"score_spread":0.3420093167889932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951985723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6284707,0.06891001,0.0010061917,0.15204288,0.0042081363,0.00010619899,0.0043342602,0.00040078163,0.14052083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92138624,0.02819467,0.00053243386,0.02090661,0.0061283875,0.000071070026,0.0023673468,0.00023066184,0.020182468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921158,0.0011956731,0.00085677806,0.0014342606,0.0030839522,0.0013135833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90759546,0.017204229,0.033195533,0.003941029,0.021319868,0.016743923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009570327,0.00035983406,0.0009958697,0.011574471,0.0026299637,0.01368561,0.0021142059,0.002153829,0.023705086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06717502,0.00036783214,0.0004903119,0.02323614,0.0025009175,0.010175635,0.0027024918,0.001563263,0.005112296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048923795,0.00021834364,0.45627168,0.0015563854,0.00022624183,0.0012103232,0.013259504,0.0002773688,0.0010740324,0.028830076,0.09539277,0.40119398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113029164,0.00029509433,0.5991165,0.0010857544,0.00016497943,0.0019828337,0.019535787,0.0002692102,0.0008093982,0.022927335,0.35363096,0.00006919912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009512578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00948932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043738377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043187174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07930142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952166899","doi":"","title":"Mapping of Research Productivity on Nanotechnology in Canada: A Scientometric Profile","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scientometrics; Geography; Bibliometrics; Regional science; Data science; Nanotechnology; Library science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth; Materials science","score_opus":0.43557752336805244,"score_gpt":0.47755792123351615,"score_spread":0.0419803978654637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952166899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9023462,0.006886479,0.0013088371,0.0025223733,0.000053186603,0.00015618643,0.03696563,0.00022254017,0.04953867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97614753,0.00538417,0.001488435,0.000114006456,0.00003267689,0.000057466234,0.009182018,0.000037213194,0.007556402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470204,0.00017261482,0.0002873211,0.00029881936,0.0038833336,0.00065586524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788482,0.0018706174,0.0020694516,0.00032938048,0.015404303,0.0014779438],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027659342,0.00035544997,0.00067106995,0.041105174,0.0036177952,0.00497663,0.0008464786,0.00039993666,0.0023275542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01426132,0.00017217857,0.00078992953,0.09997143,0.0008733914,0.0013247512,0.0017179545,0.00038091044,0.00067965925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001735872,0.000058710433,0.8272192,0.0010618457,0.00022385153,0.00042129005,0.005805802,0.002254726,0.0017991342,0.0055392114,0.014090949,0.14135166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004270685,0.00003245484,0.96617395,0.00014964634,0.00007014057,0.00014751384,0.004493715,0.0020148295,0.0007863156,0.0003209593,0.02577143,0.000034813216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9642997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99723405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038098685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07893531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2764266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952228433","doi":"","title":"Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Causality (physics); Metadata; Discipline; Scholarly communication; Bibliometrics; Confounding; Citation analysis; Selection bias; Causal inference; Psychology; Social science; Library science; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Publishing; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.6900457663182267,"score_gpt":0.6178974114266189,"score_spread":0.07214835489160776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952228433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869668,0.004572655,0.0007137177,0.0003876789,0.000082132465,0.000038137052,0.0029983302,0.00007244198,0.004168088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943526,0.0009841302,0.00045356044,0.00007452662,0.00009485661,0.000050018207,0.0030030666,0.000026095946,0.0009611504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077713,0.002367446,0.0018758561,0.001278828,0.0031717655,0.0005290505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79159003,0.09630137,0.060629122,0.012284594,0.03225098,0.006943874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958678,0.00027672297,0.0005972659,0.02755211,0.0006275872,0.0023336557,0.0006765576,0.0006637271,0.0014210308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09354466,0.00021205454,0.0007486969,0.024028447,0.00097339164,0.0027476298,0.0024187223,0.0004883061,0.00065534614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043360156,0.00009749417,0.9671649,0.00039929862,0.0007438557,0.00023055346,0.002018315,0.00039844387,0.001902771,0.0006782246,0.001396714,0.024535865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005271152,0.00009410337,0.99673575,0.00001897963,0.00006198855,0.000063962005,0.0003497775,0.00025598198,0.0004920609,0.00014279525,0.0017657336,0.000013483407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028124363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051257396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007374391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056302187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10358608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952431389","doi":"10.1108/jices-06-2018-0059","title":"How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Originality; Value (mathematics); Deception; Impact factor; Scientific publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.39352014307942196,"score_gpt":0.5364223676103,"score_spread":0.14290222453087809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952431389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74390715,0.007716186,0.0062472085,0.10788001,0.0065892115,0.00029519422,0.0005206204,0.00052354945,0.1263208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97946584,0.0015488267,0.0013450845,0.009160896,0.0031649203,0.00009067081,0.00009872832,0.00025469984,0.0048703793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9314371,0.0293716,0.0035224296,0.003900562,0.029869208,0.0018991157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48398936,0.33564144,0.121023305,0.016072348,0.03385953,0.009413961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042196635,0.0007072685,0.00056706567,0.0055810604,0.0077864174,0.025922002,0.001246118,0.0031410346,0.008472167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30547452,0.0008448255,0.00054244214,0.0037546447,0.011351301,0.014016894,0.006621588,0.0051612244,0.002305384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017189154,0.00047793344,0.19292223,0.0026748853,0.0008246636,0.003219928,0.5173833,0.0006608864,0.0068026646,0.040684137,0.08875053,0.14388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033788086,0.0010123727,0.2386791,0.005458717,0.0009719973,0.003061579,0.3810172,0.0034428171,0.006785612,0.05052903,0.3076808,0.0010227893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035486526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051993057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050211092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030373093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22315979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952901605","doi":"10.7717/peerj.6702","title":"The cases for and against double-blind reviews","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Gender bias; Psychology; Behavioral ecology; Disadvantaged; Ecology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Alternative medicine; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8242740004907603,"score_gpt":0.6397900203902531,"score_spread":0.18448398010050715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952901605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011703069,0.13110763,0.12798658,0.5940227,0.072166316,0.0056858854,0.0009904376,0.0015496671,0.05478775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23668282,0.05773202,0.306018,0.3079924,0.053003557,0.021875113,0.00063118886,0.0023843264,0.013680631],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.10656796,0.6006132,0.11452917,0.03220598,0.14163262,0.0044510504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.027977768,0.6718896,0.120586544,0.10146332,0.07265421,0.005428579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7582632,0.003064142,0.0063185664,0.0149779795,0.0094775,0.024472453,0.008904277,0.03150424,0.00885096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8941369,0.004354701,0.006266246,0.011169069,0.040443994,0.03209364,0.017466174,0.0227158,0.006888519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022345062,0.00019473814,0.016474668,0.04795451,0.0031623864,0.002478543,0.037848867,0.00046954746,0.0022050997,0.23681757,0.3057093,0.34445032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009890287,0.00029199492,0.0070819906,0.06988087,0.0013428718,0.0052511217,0.0058667376,0.0024355003,0.0033994608,0.15153332,0.75133044,0.00059674395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021284563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025357348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24173683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024422372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29810458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952984634","doi":"10.1002/asi.21062","title":"Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":791,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Comparability; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Library science; Computer science; Impact factor; Database; Information retrieval; Data science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.20610781372987888,"score_gpt":0.48500233537019927,"score_spread":0.27889452164032036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952984634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052307,0.0078831995,0.013707599,0.0010189147,0.00040855806,0.00024209011,0.025335776,0.00077234104,0.04540085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717435,0.0026153133,0.0065451865,0.00006724371,0.00025487554,0.00018801355,0.017574709,0.00010424866,0.0009069226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742621,0.0062667076,0.0046787215,0.001179642,0.01287655,0.0007362244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89365715,0.05741387,0.019359685,0.005735436,0.02252825,0.0013055508],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012767304,0.0005515539,0.0013881816,0.07349165,0.0005772397,0.00479605,0.00063368084,0.00049722864,0.0021644775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12533748,0.00020817766,0.0009645302,0.10485845,0.00082901353,0.0033644165,0.0023491045,0.0006026737,0.0013704051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009933502,0.00024807514,0.7699904,0.0021429085,0.0038349747,0.00030016294,0.0010601501,0.0073919096,0.0020068157,0.0113883335,0.014755074,0.18588781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064502725,0.0004247208,0.9657683,0.00030439376,0.00060189556,0.0003520213,0.0015562556,0.008806158,0.0029635716,0.0066887266,0.012360034,0.00010933217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037924591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045825914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92650837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018177103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019424647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06752074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953017024","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1410.2926","title":"Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Predictive power; Predictive value; Actuarial science; Medicine; Statistics; Operations management; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Internal medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7790319744087093,"score_gpt":0.4990017019218712,"score_spread":0.2800302724868381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953017024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95074797,0.00067474495,0.010179759,0.00044817792,0.000045665693,0.000428685,0.0140589895,0.00039752398,0.023018535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98213553,0.000163928,0.008199611,0.000041780055,0.000056337576,0.0005308715,0.00735798,0.00006683837,0.0014472544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774683,0.0039317664,0.0018332662,0.0011676974,0.0045646015,0.0007558766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91905254,0.043310687,0.016754603,0.005877687,0.012224857,0.0027795665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015698764,0.00064802886,0.0015234222,0.01819948,0.00070198945,0.003075146,0.0013903884,0.00088496425,0.0057595964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07881289,0.00029068027,0.0022076021,0.015555853,0.0009050636,0.0023232023,0.0030423312,0.00078254525,0.0015376871],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003086806,0.00014933554,0.96087646,0.00016134369,0.0005247415,0.00003863904,0.00024009483,0.001714647,0.00023283064,0.0018624107,0.0024960246,0.031394765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007100581,0.0002774994,0.97830325,0.000061317165,0.00030257337,0.00007844029,0.00060218474,0.011621904,0.0007987103,0.0021810562,0.0056487382,0.00005323224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077382065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008296744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021452878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00238593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083023965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953193560","doi":"10.1002/asi.21232","title":"The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Citation; Value (mathematics); Informetrics; Quality (philosophy); Auteur theory; Computer science; Library science; Positive economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Economics; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.16186060476855738,"score_gpt":0.5397257732096541,"score_spread":0.37786516844109674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953193560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952727,0.0006787609,0.025514275,0.0021886819,0.00051110674,0.0009873653,0.0007950483,0.00025050718,0.016347282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887139,0.00010429283,0.008806702,0.00037246686,0.00020557217,0.00086150464,0.000121181336,0.000039782757,0.00077455933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9157639,0.07084947,0.0019851117,0.0052995235,0.0050893626,0.0010126262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4326035,0.51415366,0.027030863,0.019439407,0.004043859,0.0027287656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06876499,0.00072699727,0.0017336286,0.0018983713,0.0018369124,0.0032611722,0.0013585091,0.0021384617,0.0064288853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22835027,0.00043822746,0.0012851305,0.0029130145,0.009354653,0.0037523662,0.0027896622,0.0029053437,0.00062079943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09024318,0.01590031,0.33135536,0.0039478554,0.00572222,0.0011993527,0.013875886,0.02159982,0.021672517,0.33373696,0.01768693,0.14305955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014720008,0.03592142,0.3639847,0.00056440284,0.0034503674,0.00075716997,0.0037539816,0.10839586,0.01882196,0.42525452,0.023531627,0.0008440495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012703683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006027467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99810165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019001657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013240782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36366838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954177755","doi":"10.1136/jim-2019-001009","title":"Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Constructive; Ambiguity; Quality (philosophy); Simplicity; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Data science; Positive economics; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.9343851372748704,"score_gpt":0.721338219021008,"score_spread":0.21304691825386235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954177755","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008382477,0.28684863,0.28584418,0.19966152,0.10149131,0.0007701911,0.005608526,0.008381551,0.10301164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21783388,0.22745185,0.3076703,0.05847302,0.119687475,0.0030983014,0.005372039,0.010130723,0.050282404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88148314,0.04551912,0.01362928,0.007924349,0.04978107,0.001663042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.655013,0.24543965,0.023019895,0.027684504,0.041632462,0.007210353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.088747494,0.0031034916,0.0055319555,0.032389328,0.006269786,0.035775688,0.004596867,0.0068520084,0.020859396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31986186,0.0017183053,0.0026125233,0.032910943,0.021165943,0.041343916,0.0143197365,0.012561198,0.014282699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024441147,0.00006136625,0.0051963325,0.005722871,0.0006011951,0.00020842745,0.0036119178,0.00062289624,0.00079253304,0.27033943,0.23769371,0.47490495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004453205,0.00013923946,0.004276608,0.0054615797,0.00024775765,0.00070675643,0.0021705374,0.0013787982,0.0009613352,0.3425883,0.6417058,0.0003187986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018132878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018036548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96761066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004003401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009708178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46934724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954205856","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1","title":"How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Incentive; Library science; Political science; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5915490014438257,"score_gpt":0.5835091969205798,"score_spread":0.00803980452324593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954205856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936109,0.0020943682,0.00008429544,0.0004030165,0.000014915855,0.0000066998687,0.0013752261,0.000003882904,0.0024066074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749714,0.0012100954,0.000096000185,0.000020018988,0.00001783549,0.0000065560434,0.00047350882,0.0000052372625,0.00067363644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983753,0.00045853877,0.00029835125,0.00019668914,0.0003196202,0.00035145684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97008735,0.013387554,0.012311834,0.00040232105,0.0028138282,0.0009971249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029989462,0.00024288733,0.00035849848,0.011854422,0.0008138345,0.0033120844,0.00042576098,0.00055518566,0.0019904645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026864307,0.00017905989,0.00044598914,0.03885023,0.00068091863,0.0035208298,0.0014748977,0.0004817264,0.0005012326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014639032,0.000034063578,0.9684785,0.00037874776,0.00015770257,0.00035844193,0.008503473,0.0002652941,0.0003015206,0.0009838714,0.0009397235,0.01945221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056373974,0.000037986967,0.9820998,0.000305525,0.0001230744,0.0002511675,0.011801825,0.00022786511,0.00034275604,0.00020445554,0.004588941,0.0000110553965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018969836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029374385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99700105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016991227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022427763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037718832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955631702","doi":"10.1111/cid.12810","title":"The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008‐2017: A bibliometric analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Bibliometrics; Citation; Scopus; Government (linguistics); Citation analysis; Medicine; Subject (documents); Commercialization; Library science; Dental research; Web of science; Period (music); MEDLINE; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7769852019218009,"score_gpt":0.6830523692882974,"score_spread":0.0939328326335035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955631702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86033636,0.057170782,0.001156296,0.0016113354,0.00013150551,0.0006385125,0.06839343,0.00015745695,0.010404377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95227385,0.019059263,0.0015578313,0.0000873074,0.00015884197,0.0007626676,0.025170267,0.00003952219,0.00089041656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976834,0.0031180035,0.008407726,0.0011972591,0.009435389,0.001007607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9266098,0.03438975,0.024067288,0.0017837012,0.011958558,0.0011909511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011602605,0.0006563241,0.002456969,0.14829518,0.0014889848,0.004381856,0.000935696,0.0008153901,0.0038019288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068687886,0.00037033277,0.0029381418,0.1983714,0.0010099693,0.0025758813,0.0029802092,0.00043199724,0.00088833255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005412137,0.00010890667,0.884951,0.017822223,0.002650476,0.0004983829,0.002506263,0.00075033534,0.00065853616,0.0016052327,0.006357031,0.081550516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004236034,0.00010779268,0.9714272,0.0028636677,0.002027471,0.0008098619,0.0040680226,0.0010537362,0.0005028321,0.0006001927,0.016438177,0.000058701065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011797884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009333915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003975165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062475554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061361194},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2955873301","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4","title":"The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Citation; Internationalization; Foreign language; Citation index; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Consumption (sociology); Artifact (error); Scientometrics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.34542183294758166,"score_gpt":0.5814282516665357,"score_spread":0.236006418718954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955873301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642742,0.011004146,0.0007115857,0.0006827139,0.0003927803,0.000016546464,0.003911747,0.000108063105,0.018898215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935596,0.0016741023,0.00032390567,0.00004847045,0.00039617537,0.000008892184,0.0016641822,0.000019376823,0.0023053875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972217,0.00036558392,0.0004476258,0.00046594304,0.0011415735,0.00035764804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040384,0.008004749,0.0035153914,0.0009385447,0.0056736437,0.0014638366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037118753,0.0004561404,0.00092703995,0.027055794,0.0012926605,0.0047832215,0.0007736175,0.0008365059,0.0069789905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022367356,0.0001257901,0.0010906642,0.028662166,0.0006717565,0.003162649,0.0014598679,0.00051563786,0.0013871586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010697162,0.00018961633,0.7911611,0.0019650855,0.0019960196,0.0018974141,0.0037939218,0.0014350736,0.011969581,0.012992573,0.007975752,0.16355407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780219,0.00030973833,0.9603936,0.00016698713,0.0023853283,0.0013540806,0.002490756,0.003538411,0.004658825,0.0063562877,0.018156983,0.00011095462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086230375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011148055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019888491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023564883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02334702},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2956147372","doi":"10.11575/prism/33232","title":"Midterm External Review Panel Discussion of the Academic Research and University Libraries: Creating a New Model for Collaboration research project","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.6432148810038621,"score_gpt":0.5326285668549855,"score_spread":0.11058631414887665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956147372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002178535,0.005222257,0.0065490226,0.6886219,0.26529765,0.012830633,0.0029553794,0.00033628248,0.016008379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021791073,0.0101378085,0.033454012,0.65475196,0.123588234,0.050694812,0.004035518,0.0010818009,0.10046474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7871036,0.076390356,0.027185334,0.0099806115,0.09051928,0.00882085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3602826,0.095767014,0.028418208,0.021669013,0.45704195,0.036821194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36378896,0.0022302936,0.0034581893,0.008305733,0.011492467,0.019458514,0.008552127,0.034113064,0.023149641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36997327,0.0018752624,0.005579103,0.0067550763,0.005901066,0.007828404,0.014417092,0.02248515,0.0105453385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025303633,0.000033362325,0.00036255413,0.0016369483,0.00007854549,0.00029338876,0.000913262,0.00008026772,0.0015095635,0.0032539086,0.9794846,0.012100556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017636034,0.00008608709,0.0014827587,0.0032236606,0.00016714509,0.000091961316,0.0008145178,0.00017909917,0.00063702575,0.002428865,0.9905939,0.00011862584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00678926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017083716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020612877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06628569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7845615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957489133","doi":"","title":"2003. 03. 021. Робитель Ж. П. , годин Б. Оценка научной продуктивности правительства: библиометрический профиль Канады. Robitaille J. P. , Godin B. evaluation of governments' scientific output: a bibliometric profile of Canada // Science A. Publ. Policy. Guildford, 2002. Vol. 29, n 1. P. 5968","year":2003,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 8, Науковедение: Реферативный журнал","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2790156010633753,"score_gpt":0.46867937536059084,"score_spread":0.18966377429721554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957489133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044020084,0.0249825,0.003655046,0.028068678,0.0062327264,0.00035843116,0.030888837,0.0052866964,0.8961251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0149236545,0.007660537,0.0022176025,0.0025790238,0.0011693062,0.00024887727,0.009041155,0.0006864144,0.96147335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994734,0.000048019454,0.000043320444,0.000083888895,0.00018650656,0.00016484784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850476,0.00032125082,0.00017391275,0.00010974106,0.00043149776,0.0004589215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011667657,0.0017604597,0.0013809096,0.0019560803,0.0014905289,0.005720485,0.0023717291,0.005856426,0.8798495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031568394,0.00096118037,0.0008513113,0.0021056812,0.0011452079,0.0033022417,0.0015924263,0.0031313598,0.8303249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008524186,0.00026183264,0.001104911,0.00090622215,0.000043489872,0.00054762856,0.00025660286,0.00010615681,0.0005314932,0.006283513,0.64247644,0.34662935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026114358,0.00014703078,0.0048024403,0.0010031206,0.000061258055,0.0012634603,0.0003687521,0.00024437066,0.00043761276,0.0062225084,0.9851526,0.000035575104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083813965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006584196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99883324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001981109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022942284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1713801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962952465","doi":"","title":"When is an article actually published? An analysis of online availability, publication, and indexation dates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Citation; Computer science; Proxy (statistics); Library science; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Information retrieval; Data science; Political science","score_opus":0.5826787799852704,"score_gpt":0.5603896212238578,"score_spread":0.022289158761412575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962952465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92705333,0.01896864,0.005518388,0.0016589491,0.0009076111,0.00024094986,0.016585799,0.0002787483,0.028787535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727156,0.0071929656,0.006628253,0.00010642006,0.00063745625,0.00015402347,0.008502096,0.00019192895,0.0038711862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98053074,0.0041107372,0.0038410802,0.0015179515,0.009144267,0.00085517723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72961926,0.18267171,0.046863437,0.008257637,0.028122686,0.0044653285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01767483,0.00040193732,0.0010042628,0.028515458,0.0017803869,0.009609266,0.001256888,0.0008994379,0.0038161867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16211875,0.00035890818,0.0010173275,0.043133408,0.001590795,0.0067790076,0.0027795872,0.0011834939,0.0024196059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037521205,0.0003173577,0.736861,0.003734993,0.0009357313,0.003052899,0.006092428,0.0032063227,0.00544795,0.022124877,0.011942669,0.20253173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050334416,0.00038361835,0.9130961,0.0007168284,0.00048530338,0.00263874,0.0074158,0.0051594866,0.0039231866,0.0083226105,0.057642326,0.00016572043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020046302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018124484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015359451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015816528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09347457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963137438","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.01162","title":"Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; China; Cash; Originality; Value (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Reward system; Economics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Social science; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; Finance; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.10138846246810347,"score_gpt":0.3355191526593974,"score_spread":0.23413069019129396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963137438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466115,0.0010025497,0.00013661571,0.00053846784,0.000012116607,0.00002792357,0.0004923818,0.000011607684,0.0031171828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988294,0.0002943572,0.00009951278,0.000037676065,0.00001243736,0.000007967292,0.00024725575,0.0000021150377,0.00046932264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967822,0.0004429874,0.00048031058,0.00037184503,0.0014295976,0.00049302494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819834,0.0032925243,0.009195561,0.0007680617,0.00312257,0.0016378863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052013383,0.00018241548,0.00037418318,0.007317855,0.0014214314,0.00267906,0.00065636873,0.00041796034,0.0013931732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013655642,0.00017556468,0.000247235,0.013745397,0.0013492698,0.001888787,0.0014430528,0.00042739225,0.00016952613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014601197,0.000050125367,0.9487374,0.00023001224,0.000073962605,0.00043121335,0.0045816633,0.0004863748,0.00068126136,0.0037960166,0.0013323404,0.03945372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037623847,0.000035943558,0.99470216,0.000023607729,0.000020796744,0.000050493432,0.0016458846,0.0005280787,0.00022878766,0.00029763766,0.002449368,0.000013481689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05389022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06516964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99479866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009294641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10715312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963403057","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4","title":"Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Frontier; Work (physics); Position (finance); China; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.5202539924105214,"score_gpt":0.4967483396251277,"score_spread":0.023505652785393683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963403057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71987987,0.00931391,0.010521954,0.0018163618,0.00061613816,0.0005683291,0.1488084,0.00088706636,0.107588015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666069,0.0011057324,0.00583202,0.00012944806,0.0001814053,0.00051787676,0.02076361,0.000101160585,0.0047617815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970187,0.00078664906,0.00048168158,0.00035150972,0.001007417,0.0003540034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98209757,0.008471067,0.005474715,0.00061140733,0.0022879678,0.0010573289],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023417117,0.0006627647,0.0006747845,0.017015941,0.0007668293,0.0023175913,0.0004267268,0.00071924436,0.02100646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024770096,0.00015124168,0.0010498846,0.022407161,0.00083218253,0.0028649701,0.0019785848,0.0007874127,0.0026231296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007140334,0.00012066506,0.8474091,0.0020190664,0.0011585531,0.00035941607,0.0021225559,0.0021906027,0.0008277019,0.016017554,0.044372175,0.082688645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009183462,0.000255157,0.8897371,0.00037763242,0.00044128948,0.00059708935,0.0044727563,0.0028983434,0.0005916599,0.009043306,0.09141442,0.000079361875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032390668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003977518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98298407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079980155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083325297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07027364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963703009","doi":"10.1002/asi.24184","title":"Does the web of science accurately represent chinese scientific performance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Chinese science; Chinese academy of sciences; Publication; Computer science; Database; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.15175066220293887,"score_gpt":0.47737886521789225,"score_spread":0.3256282030149534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963703009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8647538,0.010633741,0.008414665,0.006443198,0.00034021089,0.00014611607,0.008585455,0.00028114213,0.10040166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994468,0.0015366744,0.0016321788,0.00019710923,0.00011927367,0.000048237358,0.0013485355,0.000025171003,0.00062483666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936847,0.0014118425,0.001065427,0.00059950846,0.0028515896,0.0003869238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753372,0.008205395,0.0066650123,0.0035847742,0.0052529653,0.0009546966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081915,0.0005819294,0.0012379002,0.021873921,0.0008668726,0.0073655364,0.0009684685,0.0009458317,0.0029920465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039732244,0.00018094768,0.0006980398,0.044387013,0.001852464,0.008926427,0.002015955,0.00062053464,0.0011897166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013592785,0.00011829511,0.808485,0.0007449081,0.00075042836,0.00020735656,0.0015111177,0.002817862,0.0006398408,0.012693587,0.005567132,0.16632862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022044676,0.00012205225,0.94740915,0.0002903296,0.00029785075,0.00028930808,0.0025426717,0.014268825,0.000866855,0.017304339,0.016518483,0.00006805999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015393595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011637995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029384745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029156376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04332131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963769888","doi":"10.1101/706622","title":"Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Publishing; Audience measurement; Promotion (chess); Publication; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.27668157907105473,"score_gpt":0.4268075425965433,"score_spread":0.15012596352548857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963769888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99094653,0.00036487242,0.00030577809,0.0029203966,0.000029339733,0.00002206508,0.00009437018,0.0000103408065,0.0053064204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992512,0.000112820475,0.00013736977,0.00013238871,0.00002422014,0.0000078667135,0.000029987279,0.0000034104103,0.00030079638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796564,0.0040288866,0.000936387,0.0004792676,0.0052278074,0.0013619413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8112187,0.0683466,0.056922767,0.0026654797,0.02739157,0.03345492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289663,0.00012795339,0.00026151523,0.0019785648,0.002112198,0.007227629,0.0007912404,0.0007923447,0.0022084499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10510513,0.0001807392,0.00022923508,0.0025229743,0.0023122323,0.0021823675,0.0014821084,0.001157868,0.0005441321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017417838,0.00021179108,0.95948946,0.00009826064,0.000060676266,0.00021756129,0.014581711,0.00014400865,0.00070709793,0.000897963,0.0017578664,0.021659398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025132898,0.00024069633,0.9355202,0.0001030725,0.000030106636,0.00032264652,0.055734552,0.0005680754,0.00077210664,0.0015798679,0.0050531235,0.000050464245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017090186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022053197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031023975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007656561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0682047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964302217","doi":"10.1002/asi.23934","title":"On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Prestige; Citation; Impact factor; Audience measurement; Social media; Readability; Institution; Computer science; World Wide Web; Advertising; Political science; Sociology; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.4257601717227294,"score_gpt":0.498834196817826,"score_spread":0.07307402509509658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964302217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920853,0.00076606375,0.00058328704,0.00033621135,0.000028229966,0.00002629792,0.00032051172,0.000022093007,0.0058320956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988952,0.00014206831,0.0002195107,0.000019657538,0.00005513656,0.000014417481,0.00022497098,0.0000062277513,0.00042269385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992434,0.001679183,0.0012410275,0.0009647552,0.003121215,0.00055985607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8255161,0.119522326,0.037242543,0.0030524204,0.010447678,0.004218867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009602552,0.00035766454,0.0005648009,0.011528302,0.0016466303,0.0040996545,0.0006776203,0.0010920573,0.0040083127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12245946,0.0002053148,0.00077355443,0.01934305,0.001612262,0.0037596961,0.001934621,0.0007877909,0.00076593104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095849806,0.00006283508,0.9845926,0.000085958956,0.00007898689,0.0002338283,0.0026636338,0.00017536196,0.00024375659,0.0008030037,0.00021465949,0.010749529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039351853,0.00007942105,0.9958262,0.000018140978,0.0000476522,0.00013393008,0.001905313,0.00043273065,0.00014329654,0.0007381651,0.00065542647,0.000015720923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062246574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057132673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99039745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019412736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020785558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050783753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964514098","doi":"","title":"Relationship between Downloads and Citations - The Case of Two Economics Journals.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.4626521940274487,"score_gpt":0.5126796524414194,"score_spread":0.050027458413970716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964514098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96270955,0.0045334874,0.001454077,0.0072530475,0.00009403167,0.000045019922,0.003198928,0.00009730324,0.02061461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958846,0.00072534994,0.00038847403,0.00008006049,0.00008384252,0.00001322529,0.00058128854,0.00000985386,0.0022331667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774003,0.0010517752,0.00013062093,0.00026358638,0.00035161042,0.00046247442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8332636,0.14386933,0.012131459,0.0014822679,0.0050062463,0.0042471658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048541524,0.0003514331,0.0010301213,0.0071091433,0.0015470292,0.0042501832,0.0016973013,0.0037314328,0.019927489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07532398,0.00036872493,0.00066189014,0.015121344,0.0017150979,0.003688212,0.0014175295,0.0032424033,0.0017556747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014609428,0.0012956011,0.87081665,0.0005611245,0.0007225566,0.0094492035,0.0017215835,0.031400215,0.0010737905,0.03355357,0.015463763,0.032480955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062566623,0.0007671084,0.72627413,0.00026300928,0.0013886777,0.006115234,0.0095180925,0.18475284,0.0011119227,0.05649761,0.012380126,0.00030553143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040228397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038881194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99514586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020470999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010887375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07998848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964681226","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029433","title":"Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Medical education; Library science","score_opus":0.7553702880246571,"score_gpt":0.6796434933006312,"score_spread":0.07572679472402588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964681226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95973927,0.008243405,0.011301687,0.0011552974,0.00016098683,0.00050315564,0.0076412023,0.00032317697,0.010931847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98733586,0.001539257,0.007076684,0.00005739066,0.00026164498,0.00034751298,0.002814422,0.000032000215,0.0005352148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98049086,0.0055964766,0.0033263543,0.0011794368,0.009004386,0.00040252035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8424872,0.105850786,0.034219794,0.0038939714,0.0111951465,0.002353063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020376358,0.0006419282,0.0015459115,0.06279798,0.00085186266,0.004951036,0.0010603747,0.0008031107,0.0032395257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122407705,0.0002983311,0.002936413,0.07353618,0.0013781644,0.0043091113,0.002306234,0.0008586911,0.0010249502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050917896,0.00018369748,0.92321974,0.0016305215,0.0017627367,0.00014689942,0.0011313561,0.0018747206,0.00038618926,0.0015997172,0.00218268,0.06537257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009709183,0.00059569906,0.9525444,0.0007576491,0.0012953347,0.00090321025,0.0026782413,0.025271282,0.0009764498,0.008531136,0.0062310337,0.0001183601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014120741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011970196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017890239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017308062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10776174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965027585","doi":"10.29173/cais1069","title":"Topic-centered Scientific Collaborations of Scholarly Journals in Information Science: A Pilot Study of Implementation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Social network analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Work (physics); Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Big data; Social media; Publishing; Political science; Engineering; Data mining","score_opus":0.347938953900304,"score_gpt":0.4843899783656596,"score_spread":0.13645102446535562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965027585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96246445,0.00009359275,0.023421621,0.0016757916,0.00004625147,0.0033940622,0.00044249845,0.00030138926,0.008160422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455147,0.000085142616,0.048906703,0.00016872924,0.000033104283,0.0034349621,0.00043345155,0.00003608295,0.0013871792],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.957786,0.03387941,0.0014975949,0.0024628467,0.0030618033,0.0013123462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8764968,0.07770713,0.0076907976,0.017638689,0.013712682,0.006753846],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055785954,0.00040416967,0.00053694105,0.0031134554,0.0030418641,0.004814306,0.002207311,0.0013197409,0.0048060087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10113284,0.0004780691,0.00074901374,0.0036401937,0.0016388351,0.006839734,0.006001991,0.0013649844,0.0009182588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013677282,0.016398273,0.26948076,0.0015868208,0.0002409851,0.0006007447,0.23354396,0.002283264,0.010371097,0.021042902,0.0036592428,0.4394242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001620874,0.019652817,0.5168365,0.0010540724,0.0006500123,0.0006542781,0.3399536,0.025311662,0.013094777,0.022273155,0.058501914,0.00039630718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038048143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039609247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99688655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023313176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074628573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29502785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965782589","doi":"10.29173/cais984","title":"The concentration of journal use in Canadian universities","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Documentation; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20807835883681525,"score_gpt":0.414279410299527,"score_spread":0.20620105146271173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965782589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96236396,0.005589265,0.00048144674,0.0014465348,0.00004534977,0.00007987975,0.0058768117,0.00013674321,0.023980072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98819065,0.0039277147,0.00077360106,0.00014778168,0.000047503196,0.000057419424,0.0020233064,0.00006200225,0.0047699763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750279,0.0022545184,0.0018301596,0.0020127804,0.015997797,0.0028768054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9193654,0.020685848,0.013891894,0.0033688513,0.036519576,0.00616856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066823605,0.00051423605,0.001276837,0.03836417,0.005506973,0.008913873,0.0025041753,0.000821137,0.0034643502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051552527,0.00050742325,0.0007468146,0.07129432,0.003179248,0.0023984506,0.00485804,0.00067864853,0.0004955324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026860728,0.0000753719,0.785811,0.0011875244,0.00044415533,0.00052245375,0.070448875,0.000621083,0.0034515753,0.004322053,0.007189561,0.12565768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145339,0.000030623953,0.9672278,0.0001526491,0.00006111275,0.00019862562,0.015408774,0.00027597457,0.0006215077,0.00019690125,0.01573431,0.000087618646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90825766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92968136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99331766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034600474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045490857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25104517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965807014","doi":"10.29173/cais922","title":"Publishing Productivity of Faculty at Research Universities","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publishing; Humanities; Aggregate (composite); Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Art; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.43570120507658433,"score_gpt":0.47684137235416957,"score_spread":0.04114016727758524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965807014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86881244,0.023165947,0.0013070414,0.005462625,0.000642263,0.00006158722,0.016264122,0.000457245,0.08382678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95078063,0.0083261775,0.001060163,0.00022037097,0.0014232297,0.000045130873,0.0069880737,0.00011547742,0.031040665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98514974,0.0023220256,0.0018626188,0.0010885736,0.0084152995,0.0011618006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8965228,0.039272007,0.025602326,0.009079284,0.022137694,0.0073857536],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076551526,0.00037117008,0.001050635,0.022226926,0.001582968,0.008412901,0.0012041986,0.0007509363,0.018947158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068620704,0.0001943899,0.0008367857,0.04387738,0.0008393795,0.0036692687,0.0021776345,0.0005776219,0.0068310685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005420228,0.00019230998,0.60174704,0.0011018285,0.00042163974,0.0005517221,0.009482887,0.0014411603,0.0031968704,0.01022667,0.022988988,0.3481069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000329782,0.0004261675,0.8744187,0.0003447333,0.00019894926,0.0012233629,0.0087510515,0.0014903689,0.0064879744,0.0063167517,0.10018785,0.0001210971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038519315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004746972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029332081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024113422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06338453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965833455","doi":"10.29173/cais981","title":"The Key to Fostering Transdisciplinary Research Collaboration: Finding the Connections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45543711821229266,"score_gpt":0.523621476118981,"score_spread":0.06818435790668836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965833455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34970725,0.015256448,0.5508862,0.033632148,0.00084870594,0.00094187097,0.0007315047,0.0007728639,0.047222972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76755965,0.0052969386,0.22062463,0.0011127441,0.00033882176,0.000775888,0.00044478785,0.0001793739,0.0036671055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96630603,0.021094244,0.002273467,0.0037362503,0.0057066795,0.00088340184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89078987,0.07293505,0.013869193,0.01074846,0.008725844,0.0029315436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020278906,0.0007127567,0.0014078593,0.0083294185,0.005710673,0.013343976,0.001824354,0.0032620155,0.003337421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081371,0.00077793736,0.0013551539,0.009963545,0.007764136,0.019708393,0.009482111,0.0029145277,0.0015688094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003755001,0.0002929196,0.0829244,0.004635656,0.00063651975,0.0011774135,0.18684535,0.0021244336,0.01661959,0.16334487,0.0055974014,0.5354259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071529124,0.0005696556,0.08810488,0.00359479,0.0006646469,0.002784132,0.18193296,0.0127189085,0.011264106,0.5082528,0.18957604,0.0004655761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018845083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022766958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022513652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054449607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10724634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966651927","doi":"10.29173/cais1032","title":"Does advisors’ disciplinary background affect LIS doctoral students’ publishing productivity and quality?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publishing; Affect (linguistics); Publication; Library science; Discipline; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.3665895801454556,"score_gpt":0.4895629892077032,"score_spread":0.12297340906224757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966651927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754304,0.0070215208,0.000669027,0.0035387527,0.00019082158,0.000021254325,0.000641777,0.000046396228,0.012440074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922536,0.0027549863,0.00062356784,0.00043832537,0.00037889896,0.000015491063,0.00042095268,0.000023128574,0.003091214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937024,0.0022831536,0.000749433,0.0005756845,0.0020648912,0.00062440394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8310652,0.06424677,0.046312567,0.003836403,0.022759074,0.031779964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112529555,0.00022341637,0.0005946882,0.0048368247,0.0011326364,0.0063052727,0.00064531,0.00066364615,0.0071425186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07283039,0.00014462981,0.00033848634,0.008835099,0.0007883474,0.002304304,0.0015917236,0.0008573805,0.0020760717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040384106,0.00026279918,0.8771473,0.0005602635,0.00020419912,0.00045902934,0.006131407,0.0002666301,0.0012499017,0.0008578272,0.0024904127,0.109966375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003308934,0.0002304124,0.9796957,0.00022340068,0.00008036973,0.00039741554,0.0055129374,0.00031379628,0.0007315735,0.0006301904,0.012129365,0.00002182026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038885102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065814205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018844904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035727848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05951202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966757429","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.07.016","title":"Playing the game of scientific publishing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6921251465731033,"score_gpt":0.622700387842901,"score_spread":0.06942475873020226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966757429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14749816,0.0024611268,0.22910395,0.11845307,0.005004302,0.0006264987,0.0007067846,0.0010192913,0.4951268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83355594,0.00094286207,0.10132954,0.0046273204,0.0011233618,0.0006870667,0.0002670644,0.00020341831,0.05726332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006546,0.0066584866,0.00033639945,0.00077846297,0.0015136993,0.0006474713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94865996,0.04079079,0.0019972415,0.0014250478,0.0014984705,0.0056285625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097117955,0.0013165333,0.0012128991,0.0018019052,0.0033748606,0.011223464,0.0021017161,0.0047906865,0.03477387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056706548,0.000539311,0.0008547161,0.0014207683,0.0048140115,0.009603436,0.0050430736,0.004731114,0.00347657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016371456,0.00037648313,0.003933703,0.00047685567,0.00019600673,0.0005101914,0.003882207,0.0098055955,0.0026552202,0.8593449,0.046219736,0.07096195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045090186,0.00040900602,0.0011369614,0.00021617347,0.00006231451,0.00024051148,0.0025894684,0.04457074,0.00093733805,0.8151891,0.13411447,0.000083022445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017552043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018176965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021045473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003125263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11633015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968338061","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Jo VanEvery’s (2016, 2018, 2019) Short Guides. Self-published.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.6523194840558513,"score_gpt":0.6904671361149014,"score_spread":0.03814765205905013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968338061","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005517766,0.42339122,0.0041259136,0.11896694,0.1353258,0.00018012889,0.0028701678,0.0011476933,0.3134404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018890176,0.11179809,0.0022495217,0.02675812,0.016633265,0.00015922883,0.0018298529,0.00056619314,0.8381167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852246,0.0001819847,0.00007699076,0.00016547785,0.000971656,0.00008141816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952371,0.0014981332,0.00025460916,0.00012435741,0.0024024907,0.00048332065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306302,0.0007165065,0.0007803259,0.0031154628,0.0013314501,0.005067739,0.0012977411,0.0020980223,0.12455486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009816795,0.00044613396,0.00054192095,0.003683792,0.00086009176,0.0040049185,0.0017322544,0.0033271555,0.117852755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001807549,0.0000033176868,0.000014720131,0.00008976213,8.256107e-7,0.000009055966,0.00003063962,0.00001340186,0.000017845212,0.001054219,0.97143257,0.02733178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.1456753e-7,0.000002018981,0.000046617683,0.00017491946,6.288213e-7,0.00003688023,0.000022150105,0.000008442027,0.00001035388,0.00037929017,0.99931574,0.000002260123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069867275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01753268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12455486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024654404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047580735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41667753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969396509","doi":"10.1126/science.365.6455.731","title":"Financial crisis looms at Brazilian science agency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Financial crisis; Business; Finance; Financial system; Economics; Sociology; Keynesian economics; Social science","score_opus":0.3553210795804818,"score_gpt":0.5611473229630166,"score_spread":0.2058262433825348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969396509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2701716,0.011120297,0.0016097889,0.44057038,0.005643913,0.00014426993,0.007823798,0.0010981021,0.2618179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85790396,0.0057543903,0.0011177406,0.027126718,0.0015911489,0.0000935879,0.003402383,0.000260745,0.10274938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560994,0.00044199172,0.00020792839,0.00036062638,0.002222684,0.0011568593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99008185,0.0011647721,0.0014278954,0.0004907272,0.004055262,0.0027794987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041033807,0.0005018275,0.00063913595,0.0031938322,0.0052169273,0.009391272,0.00063806813,0.004790868,0.019898677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016429247,0.00040029862,0.0005703361,0.005074136,0.0016696141,0.0031430584,0.002131299,0.004169977,0.0035668346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006042349,0.00016663545,0.074129775,0.00039680698,0.00016000848,0.0015599751,0.003832643,0.000590315,0.0035283237,0.116274655,0.65484065,0.14391604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052653188,0.00008744657,0.13052551,0.00030087127,0.000055914486,0.0005212159,0.0040329946,0.0007507577,0.0015001278,0.015130351,0.84697646,0.00006564116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09856185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09027169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09856185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010845425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022157589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19597632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969510690","doi":"10.1680/jenes.19.00025","title":"Briefing: US environmental science women are high-impact team players","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Citation impact; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.0751672395403767,"score_gpt":0.38218880267606137,"score_spread":0.3070215631356847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969510690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012646685,0.043887362,0.0015603405,0.5345712,0.3680913,0.00023380076,0.009865464,0.0008791035,0.028264804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09344009,0.07220496,0.002351482,0.16353905,0.5805617,0.00041997584,0.007381446,0.00026443528,0.07983689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988852,0.0001794394,0.0002271604,0.00020978552,0.00031544236,0.00018298272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98507303,0.008104577,0.0018848603,0.00028966542,0.0030334424,0.0016144597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001893196,0.0010204731,0.0006583109,0.0028138622,0.0012890619,0.0020191127,0.0009068319,0.0037022666,0.02693308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011074547,0.00034446776,0.0005046401,0.0020713324,0.00062406895,0.001976423,0.0013534713,0.0018570872,0.006612181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007498467,0.000027454986,0.0012304019,0.00063350826,0.000010104712,0.00010668667,0.00015642984,0.000054009844,0.00037154375,0.00061926025,0.9505042,0.046211418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003301201,0.00032129395,0.015823718,0.0009644681,0.000048838676,0.00038797903,0.0007113794,0.00018022065,0.0007147888,0.0025508294,0.97821826,0.000045272023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003792169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006708739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013405113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014538406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09010011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969705482","doi":"10.1101/741694","title":"Gender bias in research teams and the underrepresentation of women in science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Preference; Citation; Psychology; Gender bias; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.5573525771372841,"score_gpt":0.5221828900941715,"score_spread":0.03516968704311263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969705482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951132,0.0010105793,0.0007153159,0.0005414323,0.00004265153,0.000010443987,0.00018379647,0.0000054336897,0.0023771368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924254,0.00017431435,0.00011025513,0.00009944501,0.00003516037,0.000007246154,0.000045800552,0.00000352038,0.00028177066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993343,0.0030583942,0.0005835255,0.0011903067,0.0011690723,0.0006555575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600317,0.017353546,0.015100707,0.0024082963,0.0028571556,0.0022485799],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006680116,0.00017547046,0.0004232587,0.0027919833,0.00112042,0.0015673768,0.0004542934,0.00046090723,0.0056660357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030971307,0.00015626267,0.0002874942,0.00247048,0.0010775273,0.0011683172,0.0013730818,0.0003514245,0.0005565966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002937901,0.000029126719,0.9726053,0.00010442982,0.000106567124,0.00018442566,0.004848693,0.00007068925,0.0012909364,0.0010164503,0.00072110916,0.018728575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014704223,0.000098037366,0.9823973,0.00013261597,0.000057883764,0.00062784704,0.009538189,0.00035035447,0.00088702975,0.002886721,0.0029926724,0.000016624848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020078325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027502037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041281388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004760276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03532827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970628700","doi":"10.5860/choice.45-2569","title":"A generation of excellence: a history of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Management; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.9256229350292033,"score_gpt":0.6469821433869244,"score_spread":0.27864079164227895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970628700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005694386,0.24424182,0.0031513781,0.45561874,0.0108567085,0.0001504588,0.00084748294,0.00029754415,0.2791414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3442858,0.359608,0.015651546,0.11117801,0.008112794,0.00031028624,0.0008428859,0.0008098242,0.1592009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681484,0.004821145,0.0010905784,0.0017682312,0.020081758,0.0040899147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171875,0.01617573,0.0026993845,0.002772056,0.044690188,0.016475061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02856382,0.0008834831,0.0016324766,0.021157246,0.016089402,0.027217684,0.0034783033,0.007665563,0.012562074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057461157,0.00076117023,0.00095393334,0.039574757,0.021175316,0.009778131,0.007659957,0.007760371,0.0014093106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054872984,0.000056041343,0.0015105226,0.00076706713,0.00002882789,0.00013628161,0.0035983117,0.00021700916,0.00015346041,0.5209758,0.33426803,0.13823375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011014707,0.0000105763975,0.003726691,0.00066723494,0.000013022285,0.00003426615,0.0012420377,0.00009446708,0.0000864346,0.019489419,0.97456056,0.00006423684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9069086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94796085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15839283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3091942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976145},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2970770262","doi":"10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.004","title":"Predictors of Citation Rate for Original Research Studies in the <i>Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Association (psychology); Family medicine; Library science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5083581348465751,"score_gpt":0.5500133106792681,"score_spread":0.04165517583269296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970770262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4553591,0.49880043,0.0018868626,0.015236767,0.0015791283,0.0008200219,0.011532356,0.00013368603,0.014651567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9025157,0.08547687,0.004165994,0.0008971123,0.0012893273,0.0005877883,0.0039225197,0.00006942473,0.0010753496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94629383,0.012193346,0.019882044,0.002239815,0.018162627,0.0012284386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39984357,0.35072717,0.15837473,0.010212847,0.07200194,0.008839811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04563975,0.0005467208,0.0015933538,0.03874988,0.001741607,0.0061195525,0.0018189049,0.001873538,0.0050223223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3565061,0.00044014785,0.0024347745,0.047110327,0.0012341447,0.0038064194,0.0019898128,0.0013063075,0.0008247127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005337415,0.00009030278,0.9173502,0.018236335,0.0015550107,0.00075054547,0.0025955504,0.00021163445,0.0004936366,0.0007757363,0.007511728,0.049895547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109696135,0.00031742477,0.9476189,0.015420897,0.0028839575,0.0050745746,0.0048219813,0.0006611317,0.00049707433,0.0010600254,0.021417223,0.000117050564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016253565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023887474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040969905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012260772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24136895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970982669","doi":"10.29024/joa.20","title":"The Relationship Between Institutional Factors, Citation and Altmetric Counts of Publications from Finnish Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Regional science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.6515934642078601,"score_gpt":0.536494169042329,"score_spread":0.11509929516553108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970982669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98980206,0.0013556296,0.000473505,0.00023842546,0.000032429587,0.000012451363,0.00070968503,0.000017584758,0.007358186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982855,0.00038852106,0.00020778806,0.000014439259,0.000086488864,0.000008849443,0.0003821811,0.0000038998514,0.00062233186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573517,0.0009912427,0.0009526026,0.00042680858,0.00145031,0.0004438382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938227,0.03558945,0.016947538,0.0016159829,0.0049230442,0.0026968902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004301612,0.00022804091,0.0004477139,0.015646204,0.00090496265,0.004276478,0.00055269385,0.0006176794,0.004310875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041913968,0.00011909647,0.00030853128,0.027217546,0.0006607226,0.002657617,0.001652214,0.00039969783,0.0006523699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072946335,0.00006834387,0.97057164,0.00017717721,0.00008911715,0.00017965629,0.002060112,0.00026780556,0.00045285528,0.0008466068,0.0003788989,0.024834855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027494793,0.000043045984,0.9932406,0.000038327464,0.00006282908,0.0001580653,0.0031140016,0.00041347323,0.00029880492,0.00055307255,0.0020604054,0.000014637893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044158367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055150557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013315539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011847923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022749364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971042416","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.007","title":"Training researchers in publication science: why, what, and how","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Queen's University; Ottawa Public Health; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Public Health Ontario; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit","keywords":"Medical education; Training (meteorology); MEDLINE; Data science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.9615521669344763,"score_gpt":0.7569815892662182,"score_spread":0.20457057766825815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971042416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027095987,0.025343532,0.0061001894,0.92713386,0.005643303,0.0002227334,0.00013969226,0.00022908818,0.008091595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6176201,0.07071397,0.05091487,0.23296568,0.017739624,0.0010887583,0.0005126208,0.00032760922,0.00811672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8348952,0.11357958,0.008893537,0.006322918,0.02676211,0.009546647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2796795,0.5140971,0.034687653,0.02901717,0.072975226,0.06954336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24238865,0.0008105426,0.0023014927,0.006132614,0.005489691,0.027013239,0.0034778954,0.01050325,0.0077013588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52828604,0.0011578486,0.0017954934,0.009005909,0.012439685,0.025056126,0.009274347,0.014864634,0.0034748325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059285917,0.002008437,0.11168771,0.0074398154,0.00076764345,0.00030910122,0.021197762,0.000878005,0.0012053719,0.025229173,0.15779026,0.67089385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016268601,0.0019881846,0.13222873,0.039134216,0.0016081703,0.0016869884,0.08135484,0.0046380614,0.004203856,0.2972819,0.4335275,0.0007206643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059886184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011507119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00862877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052836854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93426967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971950431","doi":"10.1139/facets-2018-0039","title":"Gender and language use in scientific grant writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Gender bias; Gender gap; Medical education; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.6367548393914112,"score_gpt":0.5589574579888165,"score_spread":0.07779738140259473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971950431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98532385,0.001321985,0.00093114935,0.0014010757,0.000079367645,0.000045679917,0.000597686,0.000018569914,0.010280564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960336,0.00048013206,0.00040970172,0.00017383693,0.00005932326,0.00004990006,0.000259321,0.00002451532,0.0025096522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.981635,0.00993567,0.001982818,0.0012209165,0.0037800125,0.00144565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8769457,0.07888977,0.030335013,0.0036741209,0.005784411,0.004371061],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017400399,0.00020822948,0.00039276542,0.0035037647,0.0011476153,0.003630908,0.0005606026,0.00048296942,0.009599483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118457064,0.00015952768,0.0003838388,0.0053695673,0.001840143,0.002233882,0.0019927856,0.00055182056,0.0020291342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055888254,0.00012765886,0.88961476,0.00032937204,0.00013881736,0.00037931322,0.027745355,0.00031800361,0.0010522329,0.0033145207,0.0038345903,0.07258656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004425985,0.00018557694,0.94773597,0.00051025534,0.000075540054,0.0005309686,0.024532817,0.00065005396,0.0010702972,0.0055700857,0.0190126,0.00008167017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043871244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093207415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99649626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011084735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024025273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092023194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972059405","doi":"10.1111/medu.13950","title":"Exploring researchers’ perspectives on authorship decision making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Clinical decision making; MEDLINE; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Political science; Family medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.8299299046977515,"score_gpt":0.6605614049079696,"score_spread":0.16936849978978197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972059405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8241466,0.0068506827,0.020910533,0.080086835,0.0009475095,0.00021942997,0.000057826517,0.00006364357,0.066716984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992916,0.0011453344,0.0019715978,0.0024809288,0.00010475345,0.0000700573,0.000014163055,0.000023924067,0.0012732396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7057012,0.26344064,0.0067569087,0.0052733854,0.012402779,0.0064250096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5393659,0.40118402,0.023457466,0.009285942,0.016459333,0.0102473525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16001138,0.00088492286,0.0010327051,0.005225224,0.02626469,0.027096298,0.0039788047,0.008929895,0.002599041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21536346,0.0010185398,0.0011375156,0.003814829,0.06119218,0.019067308,0.021019934,0.011329981,0.0004489956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017602162,0.0000108949025,0.001467322,0.00008237849,0.000009731088,0.00043641706,0.9827443,0.00005536108,0.0002150945,0.011915417,0.00031997252,0.002725541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014037501,0.00004082352,0.0006637003,0.0003616624,0.000012153696,0.0005301072,0.9591961,0.00018304313,0.00026452745,0.017160058,0.021538869,0.000034986402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028639839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029872481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118038505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01632368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84623116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972696013","doi":"10.1002/asi.24299","title":"The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Publishing; Ecological niche; Diversity (politics); Discipline; Novelty; Generalist and specialist species; Popularity; Niche; Originality; Scope (computer science); Discoverability; Competition (biology); Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Computer science; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.21595988960419174,"score_gpt":0.4803504685156588,"score_spread":0.2643905789114671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972696013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95339286,0.004156081,0.001960941,0.0033086604,0.00009660892,0.00002999319,0.0004765318,0.00012520928,0.036452997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969208,0.00048262926,0.00050962495,0.00021739288,0.00009970594,0.0000072185426,0.00018606217,0.000032535576,0.0015440093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996185,0.0012356343,0.00030196027,0.00061266,0.0010056573,0.00065913313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95690805,0.013732796,0.0099635525,0.0038681494,0.0044224127,0.011105091],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046741585,0.00015308287,0.00047344572,0.007217786,0.002018597,0.00885455,0.0007954331,0.0007431871,0.0085069025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017629974,0.00021175954,0.0003331317,0.009273685,0.003922244,0.005996691,0.006531565,0.00089667016,0.00094170036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001056836,0.0002563752,0.57044667,0.0011653667,0.0002792272,0.0016833086,0.067599475,0.00064577,0.007356735,0.13702941,0.012562821,0.19991802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034207776,0.00024951244,0.81356335,0.00046828936,0.0000765628,0.0016340541,0.037863143,0.00072074815,0.0013326558,0.03397587,0.11001983,0.00006167108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011726633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028016877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99278224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023760838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016688935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028458416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973050428","doi":"10.1057/palcomms.2016.71","title":"Erratum: Reflections on science advisory systems in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Palgrave Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Advisory committee; Political science; Library science; Management; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5928247742743877,"score_gpt":0.560929275995768,"score_spread":0.031895498278619705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973050428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059715944,0.0054697976,0.00024135408,0.8371593,0.11414187,0.000031239982,0.0011573223,0.00012898797,0.041072927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037355203,0.014588652,0.0019299298,0.488993,0.034805544,0.000092532086,0.001345003,0.00086499593,0.4200251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9505969,0.0031022565,0.002846155,0.003028876,0.033484336,0.0069414424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8178597,0.02377879,0.003074822,0.0039962726,0.14041553,0.010874838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018016623,0.0012308664,0.0014953178,0.006251062,0.026276497,0.020063378,0.0066265576,0.016069517,0.054165743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15362725,0.0011816353,0.0015754701,0.01135195,0.009634312,0.008878083,0.0044346303,0.023639865,0.013856785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055053665,0.000001569607,0.00007421182,0.000026379681,0.0000023490302,0.00003255999,0.00023234772,0.00001976363,0.0000060070342,0.006404302,0.99050844,0.0026866107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095885725,0.0000028337656,0.0006164498,0.000144658,0.000008910196,0.00003804689,0.0007316956,0.00004930404,0.000050360162,0.0013027667,0.99701834,0.000027145205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96470237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96976465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98198336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13796324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30730417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973447102","doi":"10.18438/eblip29579","title":"Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics are not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Computer science; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.6195672100766529,"score_gpt":0.5780895375151042,"score_spread":0.04147767256154877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973447102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079011165,0.21241271,0.100075565,0.13619287,0.050623268,0.004913572,0.039580982,0.0033416126,0.37384823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6836799,0.08783612,0.0957185,0.021915987,0.022802865,0.0074228984,0.024394343,0.003755621,0.05247388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.62987965,0.11411034,0.04854886,0.013182398,0.19125095,0.003027763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22979455,0.27205867,0.086012356,0.045014016,0.36111155,0.0060088816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20834365,0.0015734425,0.0034511758,0.037078243,0.0037439477,0.02536719,0.004111325,0.0024169509,0.0128775295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59249705,0.0010188086,0.0018351435,0.050942134,0.0076448354,0.022753026,0.0073696338,0.0032833887,0.00843853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027351148,0.00013823212,0.036861498,0.02342542,0.0013086812,0.00013964031,0.00442281,0.000700681,0.0010753359,0.049609803,0.2099276,0.6721168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007832214,0.00033485316,0.057957515,0.016418682,0.0006565724,0.00032075803,0.0054359576,0.0015093267,0.0026242712,0.037992664,0.87638724,0.00028385982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004411305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077479267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96292174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010336237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017543534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9762532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974793655","doi":"10.1101/19005728","title":"Checklists to Detect Potential Predatory Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Checklist; PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Publishing; Data extraction; Trustworthiness; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.6351952165897039,"score_gpt":0.6152920812067557,"score_spread":0.01990313538294819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974793655","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023877025,0.78755707,0.020970957,0.01563418,0.004327486,0.12947945,0.012865449,0.0007205526,0.0045678555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1472225,0.35867792,0.14950341,0.008061245,0.0016201992,0.3248338,0.008259614,0.00025225987,0.0015690911],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.6632888,0.13169448,0.14680272,0.008471683,0.047598347,0.002143997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28159624,0.37307754,0.19385697,0.016744975,0.12960878,0.0051155793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23383823,0.0027968797,0.01086754,0.060363248,0.003432552,0.0072631696,0.0058902395,0.0039111716,0.007458829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58352065,0.0034422153,0.008779781,0.04413337,0.005291381,0.014407576,0.0066869417,0.0027737143,0.0015929366],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024972495,0.000043020547,0.0044290563,0.9317171,0.002379749,0.00011223067,0.0018366323,0.00014382762,0.0002485417,0.00065490016,0.008658003,0.049527127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085166557,0.00040008896,0.010780553,0.9436669,0.00780737,0.0003548664,0.0027335824,0.0003071441,0.00042399345,0.001530238,0.030926168,0.00021745407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005096454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015578761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013236915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06089233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94481385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979198997","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvz024","title":"Do we need a book citation index for research evaluation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Index (typography); Citation index; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine","score_opus":0.9412224849470798,"score_gpt":0.7642154891255654,"score_spread":0.17700699582151447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979198997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09251421,0.22584373,0.14745528,0.19965443,0.042528428,0.0028075096,0.016414843,0.0052664797,0.2675152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6778688,0.044145875,0.20673378,0.025109526,0.015059404,0.005988851,0.0092997635,0.0019496374,0.01384442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7889759,0.1086373,0.028436182,0.005240052,0.06694333,0.001767264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5179245,0.27194542,0.048519544,0.024456505,0.12744887,0.009705241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10531559,0.0012992177,0.0077925613,0.043828268,0.001925554,0.026839796,0.0030063204,0.0028663108,0.008214843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5022945,0.0006003713,0.0015182204,0.09165105,0.0036929878,0.020864414,0.0033655856,0.004054517,0.0047375965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049512234,0.00037271783,0.049002767,0.0073709264,0.0016259056,0.00009304732,0.0011143234,0.0012336465,0.00094088627,0.04169935,0.14478472,0.7512666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061187375,0.0016686495,0.19220567,0.016531963,0.0027568121,0.0012578239,0.008770067,0.022541126,0.0047995457,0.2525985,0.49502194,0.001236118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024684726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031206538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95617175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004752912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5569687},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2979403726","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2019.07.412","title":"CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-IMPACT ARTICLES IN THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Univariate; Specialty; Logistic regression; Demographics; Social media; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Demography; Statistics; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.31899003697260014,"score_gpt":0.4711654484148045,"score_spread":0.15217541144220437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979403726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88464296,0.030477537,0.00021261221,0.0024313855,0.00028755516,0.0002495627,0.061758306,0.000086086475,0.019853998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772016,0.0065767257,0.0002532563,0.00018631772,0.00022550207,0.00007399906,0.013822118,0.000019606343,0.0016409232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194396,0.00033150893,0.0017272696,0.00044862504,0.0046720104,0.0008766643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93902236,0.013816707,0.015277677,0.0007838151,0.023461556,0.0076378235],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024404444,0.00042691705,0.0012983029,0.048118595,0.0021485179,0.004058952,0.0013475765,0.0010878427,0.007020499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038627822,0.00024294521,0.0012163365,0.07061037,0.0006487318,0.0010669124,0.0010791909,0.0008171102,0.0009203513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003574736,0.000118772055,0.9631877,0.0013933257,0.0007678442,0.000811746,0.0005862555,0.00015899734,0.0007834118,0.0004532537,0.009786373,0.021594673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010410717,0.000020770096,0.9956689,0.00012774924,0.0001355917,0.0005347879,0.00048898766,0.0000948607,0.00011379572,0.00007364011,0.002710062,0.00002031717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30612683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4475427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99755955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076084617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017160408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60868996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980172586","doi":"10.1101/795310","title":"The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Scholarly communication; Relevance (law); Scale (ratio); Library science; History; Computer science; Political science; Geography; Business; Advertising; Publishing; Cartography","score_opus":0.3140758663651607,"score_gpt":0.4841643886087865,"score_spread":0.1700885222436258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980172586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96354765,0.002912861,0.0017925809,0.0042947293,0.0000849966,0.000034049273,0.010864919,0.00021072704,0.016257523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446714,0.0006396232,0.00049549807,0.00008030714,0.00016257644,0.000027682376,0.0025013727,0.00004580823,0.0015800834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959545,0.0011580553,0.0003411415,0.000666226,0.0015364118,0.00034372992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91387427,0.04078104,0.021815976,0.004300576,0.0134958,0.0057323133],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063825296,0.00022142041,0.00045921197,0.0080226045,0.0007256085,0.006554049,0.0006928731,0.0004813665,0.004885118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03942675,0.00019612654,0.0010066959,0.016145023,0.0008828662,0.0055061714,0.0017710952,0.0009580353,0.0018829788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009067421,0.000046569487,0.9486551,0.00014704299,0.000254421,0.00017886248,0.0016839013,0.0020065978,0.0002645691,0.004216654,0.009717247,0.03273842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071039613,0.000060421633,0.97144353,0.0000833836,0.00007796705,0.00015092715,0.0036250993,0.0065258727,0.00022825273,0.0030278082,0.014732776,0.00003688935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010408761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006994546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99930716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020207036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013999502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03375441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980178188","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00009","title":"On the topicality and research impact of special issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discipline; Scarcity; Analytics; Phenomenon; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Space (punctuation); Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.8962515934314642,"score_gpt":0.756896630519447,"score_spread":0.1393549629120172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980178188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915494,0.019495599,0.006887805,0.006778569,0.00078830175,0.00019671771,0.0020502368,0.00014894687,0.07210442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913623,0.003145932,0.0013230041,0.0001949385,0.0012267306,0.00005936461,0.0007838331,0.000058219175,0.0018458739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816098,0.0056881276,0.002436488,0.0020936183,0.006767208,0.0014047136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73113656,0.15443802,0.058069464,0.014552085,0.032935046,0.008868918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025173083,0.00036161556,0.0010828907,0.032854132,0.0024934427,0.011311466,0.00079711684,0.0011003311,0.007216699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1314865,0.00026944268,0.00077745266,0.030187396,0.003133863,0.009438893,0.0054655075,0.0016258917,0.0014845295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075801933,0.00021356791,0.7195765,0.0021128326,0.0005500537,0.0009544363,0.027034936,0.0009931938,0.00640719,0.03131407,0.008323135,0.20176212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025053665,0.00022253218,0.93781143,0.0005166923,0.00025503783,0.00066406315,0.01570928,0.0009496593,0.0020245947,0.013449197,0.028301839,0.00007064787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012378867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014571457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97482693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018747662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1331296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980909041","doi":"10.1002/pra2.50","title":"Exploring the function of citations in ancient Chinese literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Normative; Function (biology); Epistemology; History; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.1915723729450913,"score_gpt":0.4298715034228472,"score_spread":0.2382991304777559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980909041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778376,0.0036408866,0.0013154295,0.00076087343,0.0000599008,0.000026503996,0.00039940438,0.00002639203,0.015932964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771464,0.00062121334,0.0003502242,0.000023579261,0.000035497334,0.000009065162,0.0001081735,0.0000044535113,0.0011331746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980508,0.00046157753,0.00026520985,0.00022932288,0.00078691344,0.00020618313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777263,0.010942231,0.0032098524,0.0005691402,0.006893913,0.00065855775],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003150716,0.00027434243,0.00039573942,0.01814867,0.0016636549,0.0031415035,0.0005991363,0.00050638465,0.00400539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025227178,0.00010111817,0.00027694152,0.033156756,0.0016937429,0.002156012,0.0011584222,0.0004123572,0.00039737936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017066648,0.00007607395,0.7753275,0.0011542389,0.00023620354,0.00089589803,0.018553104,0.0014623349,0.0023934615,0.044152282,0.0022702988,0.15330796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018862796,0.00008651552,0.9495487,0.00029464762,0.00027057808,0.0005948856,0.013191797,0.0052825846,0.0015773532,0.017426932,0.011646651,0.00006045433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020441357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018036276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98185134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032902106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030074741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040644765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981308303","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071","title":"Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Business; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.586007628064981,"score_gpt":0.5768068421870614,"score_spread":0.009200785877919615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981308303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905275,0.0009211275,0.0006194729,0.00037853484,0.000007752433,0.00004348271,0.00003378376,0.000007472348,0.0074608414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997884,0.00055498217,0.0006875345,0.00010240635,0.00001597831,0.000033175307,0.000027836148,0.0000034021211,0.0006906384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947825,0.0023667922,0.00032744848,0.00026416773,0.0019891,0.00027001253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936372,0.04254915,0.012458559,0.0020218426,0.004368972,0.0022294316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006715762,0.00021986512,0.00048825977,0.003051007,0.0014228352,0.0025876064,0.00065558637,0.0013660229,0.0028812469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033074267,0.00024269658,0.0006327116,0.0019561548,0.0029265524,0.0022083425,0.002228903,0.0007216986,0.00027006946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071807485,0.0005089894,0.9337874,0.0002918042,0.00023903856,0.00031072323,0.0067697954,0.00039909143,0.0017703286,0.0034617067,0.00022114982,0.051521834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398038,0.0011125668,0.9762902,0.00014306465,0.00018229308,0.0010725221,0.012002253,0.0030739936,0.00068280584,0.00325428,0.0020970472,0.000054953147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032803973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006169585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016173811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017199551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03551674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981403469","doi":"10.1177/2059799119884273","title":"A new innovative method to measure the demographic representation of scientists via Google Scholar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methodological Innovations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Centre for Disease Control; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Census; Globe; Citation; Underrepresented Minority; Higher education; Population; Categorization; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Institution; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Geography; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Information retrieval; Law","score_opus":0.848374927255399,"score_gpt":0.6570818343428702,"score_spread":0.19129309291252883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981403469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41955635,0.00418897,0.14437328,0.004413515,0.0013982255,0.009762249,0.2942626,0.006426279,0.115618624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65935194,0.0028056705,0.22857586,0.0008764974,0.0008166489,0.013783358,0.07593798,0.0006221694,0.017229889],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080265,0.0021369671,0.0014492548,0.0010519935,0.004196242,0.00036293548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847298,0.005452345,0.0035182242,0.0017780538,0.0041055004,0.00041606065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068359715,0.00080280396,0.00093710655,0.033009082,0.0010741267,0.0028464196,0.0011035022,0.00077943853,0.0069221375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028624097,0.00028159824,0.0012161012,0.04757123,0.00050737435,0.0029826488,0.002017098,0.00073418656,0.0034165224],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004968455,0.0004216275,0.34013206,0.004031554,0.0010289219,0.00032099136,0.006166668,0.0010849476,0.007165245,0.02084453,0.063554846,0.55475175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019325971,0.00048965827,0.68688565,0.00075495715,0.0007803106,0.0013701853,0.008003272,0.011373995,0.007379112,0.015807245,0.26658222,0.00038021157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008464264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012349871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008884583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025226898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036152482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982303973","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.05","title":"Trends and Cycles in the Publication of Solo Papers in Business and Economics Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Competition (biology); Publication; Economics; Publishing; Marketing; Political science; Library science; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.351635277265701,"score_gpt":0.47927893181120435,"score_spread":0.12764365454550336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982303973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771541,0.009756259,0.0006606822,0.0017729467,0.00015347739,0.00002459062,0.00452264,0.00006917346,0.005886092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901416,0.0027189474,0.00068767654,0.00014371343,0.00037877893,0.00003822705,0.003731954,0.00003759153,0.0021215996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338573,0.0010437322,0.001707993,0.0010717049,0.00229459,0.0004962657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8461817,0.052568953,0.06445707,0.0043095495,0.026805384,0.005677287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00972105,0.00023721017,0.0006950714,0.019690422,0.0006387432,0.0052909143,0.0008863917,0.00085252034,0.0019610343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06901421,0.00024678893,0.0005691314,0.023312274,0.00084279565,0.0033543203,0.0014076587,0.0007354029,0.0011177459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027586005,0.000066498,0.9483,0.00047689356,0.00020121165,0.00018353685,0.0030448055,0.00047892716,0.0014085141,0.0021900092,0.002721598,0.040652093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013540851,0.00010300044,0.98365873,0.00009830752,0.000057441004,0.0004198202,0.0017256552,0.0007776357,0.00070784957,0.00096788164,0.011435531,0.000034635566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023039258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024553556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99027896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013614764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011485608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051410496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982344414","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.03","title":"Understanding Australian Academic Authors in the Humanities and Social Sciences Their Publishing Experiences, Values, and Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Social science; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8168404902069049,"score_gpt":0.5239685361619547,"score_spread":0.29287195404495014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982344414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750651,0.0013977854,0.0003699177,0.0037410315,0.00005057292,0.000020606278,0.000048392463,0.000005354103,0.01930119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932948,0.001975419,0.000309828,0.00052907923,0.000030095629,0.000017860428,0.000026801195,0.0000072516077,0.0038088479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889339,0.005871853,0.0007023081,0.00043242684,0.0031469204,0.00091254717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96814716,0.01781015,0.003585504,0.00085754215,0.0054983413,0.004101242],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009527961,0.00018065755,0.0007347332,0.0035272692,0.0078985505,0.015562026,0.00069303723,0.0012401703,0.0023725326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031882264,0.00033192514,0.00020255368,0.008113661,0.006173013,0.0051343376,0.0053141834,0.0016198717,0.00045378917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016164096,0.000031467283,0.035016585,0.000120184355,0.000013102888,0.0003930323,0.94531745,0.000041888554,0.00025918087,0.0050414614,0.0007770396,0.012972417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043644936,0.000034565735,0.035207465,0.00012810594,0.000016452148,0.0002997511,0.92215055,0.0001432494,0.00024797727,0.0036023636,0.038135763,0.000029446275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031502936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051813703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068137827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009548476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06263912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982350538","doi":"10.7717/peerj.7850","title":"Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: the example of ophthalmology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Computer science; Optometry; Ophthalmology; Data science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6882823401631499,"score_gpt":0.5873470387454104,"score_spread":0.10093530141773954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982350538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8145432,0.082807995,0.0021332838,0.035223983,0.00046799812,0.000052996857,0.0025616756,0.000048176385,0.06216075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836849,0.013573554,0.00060385733,0.00064744,0.00050335005,0.000019904557,0.00057033,0.000023664694,0.00037309996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905098,0.004565768,0.0010568409,0.0008419556,0.0022835338,0.00074218155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9225916,0.04442431,0.01880524,0.004616696,0.0068024844,0.0027597365],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006863791,0.00032114616,0.0006741372,0.01163199,0.0010546478,0.003787715,0.00057585025,0.00087945914,0.0067389454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04847906,0.00013453222,0.00064968556,0.019446988,0.0023440388,0.0038275057,0.0033904328,0.0010138525,0.00049114076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076601864,0.00015569945,0.5860331,0.0031973408,0.0010581102,0.002566952,0.020176655,0.0007126616,0.0008511476,0.024602002,0.019905768,0.3399745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004255075,0.00019613444,0.92298317,0.0029318286,0.000397045,0.003987631,0.015089558,0.00065564027,0.0004316779,0.014892648,0.038297273,0.00009476431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037752432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004260241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99942416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009382841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094854535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036299586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982640339","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.02","title":"Fifty Years of <i>JSP</i>: Golden Anniversary Compilation, compiled and edited by Mary Lui and Robert Brown","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; History; Classics; Library science; Art history; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.17878415953494883,"score_gpt":0.4211352943766775,"score_spread":0.24235113484172868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982640339","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00226986,0.09059165,0.0029545522,0.040241107,0.6555918,0.0002085243,0.040404905,0.004098521,0.16363916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010873911,0.18048556,0.009221501,0.016093615,0.24089953,0.0007404669,0.05381901,0.011292347,0.476574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524325,0.00027233313,0.00046823043,0.0002950822,0.0034226216,0.00029842817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750567,0.0033748334,0.0023315903,0.0015666073,0.014062289,0.0036079197],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037480867,0.0019861658,0.0019392614,0.016262518,0.0026324426,0.0148631185,0.001259609,0.0009917727,0.06795266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025790045,0.000956782,0.0007179528,0.018989753,0.0018269253,0.005365838,0.004583877,0.0041349186,0.08355415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071362697,0.0000054826623,0.00007401863,0.0002530936,0.0000046203045,0.000022404414,0.000058779533,0.000021050411,0.00009736406,0.00069841876,0.97995764,0.01879991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010586472,0.000005485408,0.0005556771,0.0003239519,0.0000045590796,0.00005270561,0.00006821329,0.000011121875,0.000077029166,0.00042356108,0.9984682,0.000008390349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063573294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010816718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98513687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026777594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008575949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2273243},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2983185127","doi":"10.7554/elife.34311.009","title":"Author response: Donated chemical probes for open science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Structural Genomics Consortium; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Chemical biology; Computational biology; Data science; Biology; Computer science; Mathematics; Genetics; Statistics","score_opus":0.7820483469065401,"score_gpt":0.6845863826340793,"score_spread":0.09746196427246079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983185127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005963664,0.0032444156,0.00547302,0.7573682,0.11607962,0.00028677026,0.0015518531,0.0006831397,0.1093494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07709628,0.003556988,0.0062482688,0.4088239,0.02401789,0.00080232875,0.0012241417,0.0006688633,0.47756132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810782,0.0060082297,0.0007977778,0.0018803986,0.008828326,0.001407056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92890626,0.037901454,0.003263404,0.0058067017,0.020809805,0.0033122606],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014707302,0.00064224744,0.00080981106,0.0014324418,0.003278285,0.004866126,0.0017853396,0.017617911,0.106621854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088520475,0.00054288877,0.000915554,0.0014369285,0.0036149158,0.0042951377,0.0038004592,0.009687118,0.027786115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032434327,0.0000575317,0.00051914353,0.0003291529,0.000033146014,0.00028151847,0.00026992572,0.00008376626,0.0022142858,0.031933837,0.93986255,0.024090767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080482525,0.00008022987,0.0006135413,0.000108326174,0.000019309247,0.00019202984,0.00041959257,0.0001707343,0.0041212393,0.00986149,0.98429906,0.000034011853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012326099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030041416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99821466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003557803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037810705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35668564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983983302","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03280-z","title":"Deep and narrow impact: introducing location filtered citation counting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Biomedicine; Data science; Citation analysis; Rank (graph theory); Scientometrics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.35873592871164445,"score_gpt":0.5378950683652745,"score_spread":0.17915913965363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983983302","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028273132,0.0017331223,0.9548269,0.001150038,0.0005754488,0.00014798465,0.00074893405,0.0016672416,0.010877064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.530212,0.0022140348,0.44945827,0.0007961203,0.0025145775,0.00039221765,0.001768841,0.0011231584,0.011520857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072343,0.0026300102,0.0006505298,0.0016883713,0.0035858408,0.00072182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94698906,0.030169232,0.0048113097,0.007465737,0.008980441,0.0015843093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010180747,0.0015239677,0.0030910333,0.01961381,0.0020582157,0.0095081,0.0038080092,0.0031437117,0.0048207366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091649204,0.0010385202,0.0014935703,0.016630264,0.00215653,0.014690659,0.007893325,0.003734723,0.002068852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031745943,0.00042860437,0.018972619,0.00054628635,0.00039471214,0.0003258213,0.00066706626,0.0456023,0.0030093798,0.36443248,0.010243891,0.5550594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055776083,0.000091122616,0.0035940744,0.00024117464,0.000256925,0.00017838475,0.00022974725,0.44125295,0.0032950318,0.53344333,0.01724758,0.00011398358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043236245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006132678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021976703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003622463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05384153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984452956","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/32/10/10","title":"Life as a new Nobel laureate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Physicist; Art history; Physics; Art; Theoretical physics; Literature","score_opus":0.6159426562745316,"score_gpt":0.5836635494568094,"score_spread":0.03227910681772217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984452956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011702015,0.008578582,0.00043046597,0.8103478,0.15037796,0.000010424918,0.000108331275,0.00010756432,0.028868724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04042818,0.01032539,0.0017303486,0.6323772,0.08818284,0.00009086217,0.00046427446,0.0004866408,0.22591433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803714,0.005250475,0.00056339585,0.0016644589,0.0066144746,0.0055357656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9284534,0.0024473886,0.0014084306,0.0011003622,0.008718581,0.057871822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019094586,0.001269905,0.0016952995,0.0021763586,0.015494313,0.027325153,0.0020668162,0.00920369,0.040714853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03657682,0.00050888746,0.0011687763,0.0014931699,0.008060199,0.013547829,0.01329305,0.023724576,0.026348809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053751894,0.00005513974,0.00033380897,0.000038179576,0.000020419962,0.00007348274,0.00043332664,0.00002364886,0.000113930124,0.016600577,0.96379536,0.018458402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010993528,0.000041631785,0.00020112023,0.00007665652,0.000005794464,0.00007212864,0.0008252758,0.000026137293,0.000042298925,0.008164405,0.99051195,0.000021696947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035094183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011405245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040714853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075716386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017396478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13620478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984616697","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2019-0589","title":"Looking back on 90 years of the <i>Canadian Journal of Physics</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Library science","score_opus":0.29760739385943324,"score_gpt":0.44439472771155336,"score_spread":0.14678733385212012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984616697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033650568,0.2555938,0.0006072044,0.45927882,0.16932797,0.00003935656,0.028722586,0.00029211538,0.08277315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04607946,0.26884025,0.0021900556,0.28880605,0.079747565,0.00007875923,0.03220758,0.0010228092,0.28102744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938139,0.00020847871,0.00034845292,0.00040732138,0.0042811604,0.0009407279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966292,0.0027577765,0.0026210896,0.0007972919,0.021330185,0.0062016905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035685264,0.0009819036,0.0013650007,0.020098677,0.0048988163,0.012205689,0.0016760327,0.004588762,0.049154356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026267342,0.00046575995,0.0011478781,0.033174623,0.0028458487,0.006582749,0.0034703873,0.007264407,0.020647908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003687443,0.000009111069,0.0010804526,0.00056317786,0.000019815296,0.00009547959,0.00016015582,0.000036195957,0.000099846795,0.0030268999,0.9646957,0.030176256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038212293,0.000005453686,0.0072630853,0.00075660273,0.000016794898,0.00006313365,0.0003744657,0.000012336244,0.000051985146,0.0006447446,0.9907808,0.00002683715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54934186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78583014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99643147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015510929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034789927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985457196","doi":"10.1111/caje.12460","title":"Social connections and editorship in economics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7290401826152794,"score_gpt":0.37905386183735806,"score_spread":0.3499863207779213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985457196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97494376,0.0016601462,0.0005957361,0.0022401558,0.0001468751,0.000024225716,0.00028208023,0.000033686174,0.020073336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977787,0.00021258472,0.00012346821,0.00003684795,0.00017489294,0.000007565703,0.000050504616,0.0000055425608,0.0016098937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959741,0.0017137586,0.0003328263,0.00048239288,0.0010473329,0.00044957935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88294166,0.04656368,0.04865647,0.0021869263,0.0065850094,0.013066165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035844776,0.00017794388,0.00026185482,0.004421425,0.0013655104,0.0033711465,0.00054959784,0.00060218223,0.01076368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045954585,0.00017322853,0.00020276837,0.0040974068,0.0010436489,0.002156729,0.0018081848,0.0006588946,0.0011291357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021608421,0.00022906491,0.9449309,0.00019990261,0.00020046484,0.00043534598,0.0058277347,0.0006122112,0.0005040287,0.0043898146,0.0036439067,0.03881051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024603403,0.00009040903,0.97680557,0.00008599765,0.000032559292,0.00026325873,0.0046114316,0.0006243817,0.00025567136,0.0027554953,0.014429615,0.000020902531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013335358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00192929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008453083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078774395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03600806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987347589","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3163679","title":"Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Citations in Mathematics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geographical distance; Similarity (geometry); Citation; Institution; Logit; Economic geography; Control (management); Subject matter; Interpersonal ties; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Economics; Econometrics; Demography; Management; Computer science; Law; Population","score_opus":0.36140437967926564,"score_gpt":0.5295783810219614,"score_spread":0.16817400134269578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987347589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709163,0.0044179317,0.0008895292,0.0032008577,0.000039663762,0.000020102514,0.0005922499,0.00001631641,0.01990712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668604,0.0018998306,0.00018803975,0.00007930941,0.00010344667,0.000011417969,0.00027099473,0.000005835255,0.0007550398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950571,0.0023267898,0.0005191809,0.00048273487,0.0012655882,0.0003485993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7542287,0.18684031,0.03988646,0.0051850374,0.008558201,0.005301327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060550417,0.00030644637,0.0008519718,0.009613201,0.001878574,0.0046195663,0.0010599414,0.0016544508,0.013160315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13024275,0.00025213216,0.0004717813,0.025595522,0.0026574298,0.007113914,0.0031951517,0.0013360706,0.0012051092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006607898,0.00045939104,0.919174,0.00057746685,0.0007233038,0.00036796104,0.0058306074,0.0018631964,0.00016012906,0.018312173,0.0019790118,0.049891915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021016948,0.00024790957,0.9225117,0.0004356757,0.00090674375,0.00031693224,0.009950879,0.0023896717,0.0003508065,0.05525008,0.0073811444,0.00004833257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008386407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078029386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99394494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008467775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001303631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04402566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987668259","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03291-w","title":"Evaluating medical conferences: the emerging need for a quality metric","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Metric (unit); Publishing; Observational study; Computer science; Library science; Ranking (information retrieval); Political science; Medicine; Business; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8632070423881478,"score_gpt":0.7154768984215607,"score_spread":0.14773014396658712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987668259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08812633,0.2634358,0.3230178,0.24549869,0.008044943,0.0005731502,0.0032417118,0.0010686647,0.06699291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6723621,0.061392844,0.23986183,0.0075138886,0.012191145,0.0005961625,0.0021246471,0.00040555536,0.0035517407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9123923,0.0390412,0.008899041,0.0034818847,0.035222717,0.00096288905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6291033,0.23071933,0.03911698,0.011591859,0.0789587,0.010509906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09008127,0.001213188,0.0038828661,0.031239811,0.001719946,0.022863923,0.0032110906,0.0039354744,0.003465669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29894662,0.0003826401,0.0009471984,0.032144755,0.004259537,0.017944248,0.004328618,0.003433658,0.000848702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030164002,0.00040844697,0.054012805,0.0059015458,0.0007818431,0.00006779688,0.0008482517,0.006788179,0.0009568855,0.1781715,0.035237934,0.71652323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001928474,0.00133892,0.06524535,0.0071059475,0.0007836672,0.00066272874,0.007461706,0.07664776,0.0032199682,0.6886451,0.14824364,0.00045236776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035286208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004649257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079839565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012048221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47640097},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2989385916","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12860","title":"CITATIONS AND INCENTIVES IN ACADEMIC CONTESTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Incentive; Index (typography); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Microeconomics; Rent-seeking; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6736258481036862,"score_gpt":0.6097729619107982,"score_spread":0.06385288619288798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989385916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237532,0.0029912484,0.020187987,0.012122536,0.00024598278,0.00020838017,0.00023879239,0.00007793016,0.24017389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958835,0.00027262478,0.000800082,0.00018705928,0.00009492142,0.00004777471,0.000017648228,0.0000071429154,0.0026891413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878106,0.0077206483,0.00044517376,0.0006327744,0.0012038517,0.0021870006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9049261,0.06502208,0.015228482,0.0024623608,0.0037203243,0.008640696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01792577,0.00051928975,0.0012948372,0.002869593,0.0036238972,0.00974401,0.001122639,0.0037015085,0.017148163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06433126,0.0003783483,0.00069931283,0.0031275707,0.006793223,0.0058036903,0.0052904473,0.0020661347,0.0009768988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959679,0.0001839792,0.009266127,0.00014917032,0.000039747403,0.0001776859,0.0008688929,0.011227711,0.0005000348,0.96034074,0.002528191,0.0142217465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033670414,0.00014835052,0.008003262,0.00008791145,0.000033973338,0.00009499658,0.0015765183,0.0266309,0.00027665586,0.9543938,0.008365558,0.000051351657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001692977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018524624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00565645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034008487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094801664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989484692","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x","title":"Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Turun Yliopisto","keywords":"Altmetrics; Discipline; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Social media; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.838152280754456,"score_gpt":0.6455667087672443,"score_spread":0.1925855719872117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989484692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99326444,0.0010676997,0.00030005226,0.00025024443,0.00003563472,0.000026342084,0.0007693393,0.000010322519,0.0042759487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.00040191837,0.00018815685,0.00002853516,0.00007264311,0.000019400679,0.0004634517,0.0000071426603,0.00048720487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160695,0.0019151017,0.001827177,0.0011128639,0.0027279148,0.0008100394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9074108,0.05556415,0.025274768,0.0022608207,0.0065483116,0.0029411982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008427206,0.00034334336,0.000693315,0.01350868,0.0011354105,0.005366983,0.0006843494,0.00089534046,0.0052178707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063900284,0.0002105929,0.0008833063,0.018014345,0.0011731354,0.003730272,0.0029875662,0.00041769666,0.0009842133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035258528,0.00010411146,0.9596991,0.0006300591,0.00024864508,0.000508191,0.015253242,0.00013283094,0.0011366385,0.00079670944,0.0004198752,0.020718029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009326968,0.00011982936,0.9823498,0.00009192167,0.00014745127,0.00026849326,0.013581686,0.00023175824,0.00047911066,0.00041786124,0.002282898,0.000019938047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032220185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012262786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001218159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044567823},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2989988376","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421","title":"Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; European Commission","keywords":"Peer review; Reputation; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Specialty; Prestige; Publishing; Medicine; Medical education; Social science; Sociology; Family medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.7235323662160645,"score_gpt":0.7043026568809326,"score_spread":0.019229709335131906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989988376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98124105,0.0026839194,0.004777042,0.005586532,0.00032371175,0.0003448588,0.00013937043,0.000030104315,0.004873519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99264777,0.0015081568,0.0017535463,0.001543513,0.00011220807,0.00042426254,0.000042731608,0.000025499425,0.0019422969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95996356,0.031496055,0.0014597045,0.001409783,0.0033314063,0.0023394672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.820598,0.15101841,0.010854089,0.0014546332,0.0089575015,0.0071173003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047187712,0.00046271976,0.0010606969,0.0020680507,0.0067571593,0.0067645875,0.0015850903,0.002459737,0.0017076278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106391944,0.00080618303,0.0004440558,0.0022833517,0.008806917,0.0054139975,0.004402491,0.0026315337,0.00026444957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093518334,0.00005716138,0.0054839686,0.0003995235,0.000009246834,0.0012369062,0.9858525,0.000050000122,0.0008984818,0.0010166917,0.00074218825,0.0041598123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019412528,0.00010264938,0.002768934,0.00036002803,0.000010363443,0.0005530139,0.9821879,0.00009649015,0.0004298821,0.00055857823,0.012883838,0.00002888169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023473685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026604952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040220865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006563152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24955547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990936998","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.oa.16.00003","title":"Introducing JBJS Open Access","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"JBJS Open Access","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Mandate; Editorial board; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7193090262193096,"score_gpt":0.7295967187681344,"score_spread":0.010287692548824778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990936998","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008559481,0.008074477,0.010236979,0.22983934,0.5394021,0.0007698531,0.0012653688,0.008357235,0.20119868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012261294,0.017303089,0.016571933,0.1626006,0.35241827,0.0013589732,0.0029253927,0.00817974,0.4263806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642487,0.005058918,0.004288268,0.00332054,0.019654306,0.00342927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83465123,0.027342323,0.00890084,0.015737165,0.064116575,0.04925185],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030123433,0.0014509487,0.001616509,0.0066077607,0.004998861,0.025689714,0.0046794144,0.018705783,0.3780644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17844155,0.0015629743,0.0031765113,0.003051326,0.004925929,0.0129941795,0.012098385,0.022613734,0.24342945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022276103,0.00003700021,0.0001688473,0.0003960727,0.000012748966,0.00020179413,0.00014910118,0.000029668221,0.00012235685,0.005473659,0.9403669,0.05301961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013822919,0.000014976386,0.00013534265,0.00039467742,0.0000059917347,0.00026913354,0.00012790371,0.000035810386,0.000045861274,0.0019817185,0.99695456,0.000020207723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015531073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023887577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99532056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041899523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020361843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88711566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992890322","doi":"10.29173/jchla29389","title":"An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Health professionals; Publication; Public relations; Work (physics); Medical education; Psychology; Health care; Political science; Medicine; Business; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.07273604979052904,"score_gpt":0.4722611424672414,"score_spread":0.3995250926767123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992890322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47400978,0.002191415,0.09141499,0.1954417,0.035386555,0.05995826,0.0038987016,0.009411188,0.1282874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46646443,0.0035354744,0.18017797,0.059058156,0.012916906,0.05542538,0.0019203754,0.0006767148,0.21982457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958169,0.0019387258,0.0002508669,0.00047770966,0.0004051133,0.0011107365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767542,0.009280012,0.0010363798,0.0007737899,0.0030713584,0.009084172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007596765,0.0011955582,0.0010168547,0.0018784084,0.00496871,0.0023983456,0.0013729793,0.0061559547,0.028177047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019692766,0.0009065307,0.0011952417,0.00057199865,0.0017493347,0.0019384789,0.0071370183,0.007919885,0.0061802748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034665354,0.030351067,0.012033477,0.00490325,0.00015637396,0.00877812,0.08245126,0.0019730148,0.032731995,0.0049305097,0.3643299,0.45389453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023351097,0.0071767955,0.041541632,0.0011660532,0.00015986245,0.0020300518,0.026600631,0.0023687019,0.0086223865,0.006715515,0.9009475,0.00033579863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021724943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006859921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032646041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061986037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094261646},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2993168401","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-065","title":"Evaluating the Relationship between Pay and Research Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from Ontario Universities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Productivity; Panel data; Construct (python library); Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Public sector; Empirical evidence; Accounting; Economics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.950732684546332,"score_gpt":0.6520624583787293,"score_spread":0.29867022616760264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993168401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790806,0.00062185875,0.0004710094,0.000896337,0.000011693337,0.000043348096,0.014180555,0.000013511444,0.0046811257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615986,0.00037981445,0.00024820605,0.000087466105,0.000013223214,0.000032765744,0.01061462,0.000005508561,0.0024586266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815506,0.0003524096,0.000117157324,0.00022415262,0.0006280739,0.0005231185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824315,0.0055653774,0.0054667136,0.0012438683,0.0036767607,0.0016159259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033291408,0.00023848326,0.00056493987,0.0020677545,0.0013813496,0.0015016054,0.00072331144,0.00049155246,0.0024093254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012622821,0.00027853376,0.00045755593,0.00690039,0.00067829643,0.0005295832,0.0010553765,0.00049584423,0.00037212402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013711303,0.00003298351,0.9883469,0.000047779515,0.00013900117,0.000063388245,0.0009535111,0.0021550802,0.00024609838,0.00054092717,0.0025565499,0.0047806636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145395825,0.00001097229,0.9955695,0.000018157067,0.00004739639,0.00000770687,0.0005734345,0.0011841833,0.00010999556,0.000093128125,0.0023597307,0.000011196983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98140496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99793226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015776193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013994945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11446482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994083704","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.2047","title":"Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, <i>h</i> -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Diversity (politics); Index (typography); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.36235361469056565,"score_gpt":0.45546837601989854,"score_spread":0.09311476132933288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994083704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8860785,0.0021053122,0.0072493143,0.04790643,0.0005239769,0.000080072336,0.00012407915,0.0000757296,0.055856448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539053,0.00039362782,0.0010868543,0.0010070392,0.00008790599,0.000019400037,0.000017834982,0.000027771175,0.00196888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668258,0.022147147,0.0012298432,0.0017330609,0.0055106822,0.0025534348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92613125,0.0362659,0.011842077,0.0039239656,0.010547739,0.011289028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03222939,0.0006362376,0.00076890126,0.0049239686,0.0076945727,0.03342789,0.001742379,0.002276958,0.0031215423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08450601,0.00071711856,0.0006478414,0.003983324,0.018375175,0.014917109,0.00925797,0.0047062566,0.0008435638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006181949,0.00056933274,0.29324833,0.00029684496,0.00026571783,0.001019642,0.22830255,0.0024628036,0.0028908306,0.27301836,0.014726085,0.18258126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001488523,0.000560765,0.28646567,0.0006057027,0.00016811241,0.000796706,0.26865205,0.007365293,0.002891657,0.3294228,0.10231296,0.0006093691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012208684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01634009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99507606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010029186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054542283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17044735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994214050","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31808-2","title":"Gender bias in CIHR Foundation grant awarding","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Gender and Health; St. Michael's Hospital; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Political science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8374126215288672,"score_gpt":0.5756409761241855,"score_spread":0.2617716454046817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994214050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006482959,0.0014576631,0.000046890233,0.98989654,0.005360395,0.000004092271,0.00006528063,0.0000066046755,0.002514258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0246235,0.0014963824,0.00015370513,0.936834,0.03262181,0.00003672618,0.000064138025,0.00002713419,0.004142567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9430838,0.02324896,0.0063680857,0.0041746977,0.01570251,0.0074219326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6857198,0.24150987,0.01509508,0.008869232,0.026061561,0.022744544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0688965,0.0005304079,0.0022343423,0.003641323,0.0059655798,0.009632847,0.0037163747,0.057231214,0.010201713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29439795,0.00097207894,0.0014253998,0.004767184,0.010037281,0.0059604757,0.0047348477,0.027105054,0.004134834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018838965,0.00002892332,0.006145286,0.00015986989,0.00008510276,0.0006042326,0.00059742434,0.000058870755,0.000086190135,0.021636225,0.9466507,0.023758754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006512837,0.000115676085,0.019577773,0.0023429794,0.00030812644,0.0019161451,0.0030752772,0.0009611112,0.00062889874,0.11216267,0.8580593,0.00020079045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033873517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071351446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136381565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020143662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3643639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994940827","doi":"10.29024/joa.21","title":"What Is Societal Impact and Where Do Altmetrics Fit into the Equation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Social impact; Meaning (existential); Political science; Impact assessment; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Social science; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.4838761285065922,"score_gpt":0.5875435062790783,"score_spread":0.10366737777248608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994940827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1955954,0.06793922,0.20377204,0.22689246,0.005307872,0.0006581019,0.008780468,0.0016395231,0.289415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93955183,0.016055005,0.0331059,0.004727797,0.0018594194,0.00026059532,0.0016539248,0.00031591425,0.0024697192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722464,0.013740322,0.0021525663,0.0021207628,0.0085051935,0.0012348624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85184574,0.08823868,0.023758706,0.008568977,0.024947578,0.0026403684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0347229,0.0013439365,0.001878051,0.022323474,0.0015711392,0.012884369,0.0018571253,0.0029369032,0.0069983755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22653209,0.00045922294,0.0020878897,0.0356299,0.0067393924,0.024379114,0.0043051215,0.0036939408,0.0030506498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011534735,0.00015327265,0.38718566,0.0018736209,0.0015288644,0.00021152271,0.004600105,0.00818637,0.00028292072,0.24535744,0.025438821,0.3250661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036363086,0.00020532934,0.27322587,0.0042331233,0.00066872296,0.0007172243,0.012417583,0.020758547,0.0008885197,0.5799518,0.106502086,0.00039482513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009945124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077663283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056620985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036909184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1836344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995045919","doi":"10.21810/pop.2019.009","title":"Building and Supporting Humanities-Based University–industry Partnerships: View from the Academics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Engaged scholarship; Public relations; Promotion (chess); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.8787113822494896,"score_gpt":0.5958663074063777,"score_spread":0.28284507484311194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995045919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34239253,0.0091655245,0.012714619,0.39425924,0.0009114414,0.00017592628,0.000092401766,0.00013256325,0.2401558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98081553,0.0032532145,0.002149617,0.0076356516,0.00027235283,0.00008067728,0.000027758299,0.00003707421,0.0057282904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515417,0.03651726,0.00070503313,0.0014058616,0.005053787,0.004776411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426064,0.033864874,0.0033080422,0.0025441137,0.0045947107,0.013081807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041377667,0.000453292,0.0006657147,0.0047051534,0.024372593,0.03706812,0.0027257914,0.0075975917,0.005622769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040374048,0.00053441466,0.00063670165,0.0050486373,0.031845137,0.021910535,0.03413115,0.008158575,0.0009289012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006125368,0.00031643084,0.011417659,0.00044496264,0.000050471797,0.0012252675,0.48557106,0.0004945814,0.0005185436,0.39622036,0.023640271,0.08003926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001878906,0.000073917916,0.0023003446,0.00054211926,0.000015065101,0.00035947294,0.7014191,0.00044864792,0.00041782466,0.08052925,0.21383816,0.00003728407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036223773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059339125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041377667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011959785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028910303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21882862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995085135","doi":"10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w","title":"Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Inclusion (mineral); Public health; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Political science; Public relations; Nursing; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.5707412540395201,"score_gpt":0.6020424589318087,"score_spread":0.0313012048922886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995085135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000627358,0.00022147686,0.000053945594,0.99213773,0.005017636,0.0000040763416,0.000033668683,0.000013559456,0.0018905496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012252497,0.00048264605,0.00024473591,0.95543027,0.026622279,0.000020148243,0.000027804599,0.00002670181,0.00489298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97697157,0.0044391425,0.0036926449,0.0020326045,0.010304934,0.002559138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7810425,0.13967067,0.017314712,0.006457296,0.03147129,0.024043556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022955371,0.000577388,0.0013326576,0.0024978134,0.007613298,0.012085318,0.0021204816,0.06838976,0.0059855278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21412265,0.0008729442,0.0012131314,0.0034866107,0.00641008,0.006654798,0.003944348,0.038134053,0.004733111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008567998,0.000045283294,0.0051710363,0.00007637837,0.00003802599,0.0009549828,0.0005421606,0.00004760589,0.00019893247,0.0062875715,0.96906203,0.017490296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492516,0.00015210602,0.0164885,0.0012567695,0.0001422196,0.0029580132,0.0037387297,0.0013759935,0.00097631005,0.057880916,0.91455096,0.00023016857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015538308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036948156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068277176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013363112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12140107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995379720","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2017-031","title":"Transparency in Peer Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.848945792683576,"score_gpt":0.6931156795503436,"score_spread":0.15583011313323236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995379720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004927123,0.0069913133,0.08362166,0.34671474,0.21514183,0.013972947,0.009760027,0.009685112,0.3091852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12982284,0.005431573,0.09990057,0.091988295,0.06466035,0.030487701,0.011680832,0.009075835,0.5569519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5023321,0.14155744,0.093774766,0.04130745,0.19460607,0.026422216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0871879,0.26624164,0.05204043,0.24414559,0.31996885,0.030415636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28296545,0.0030416343,0.010755164,0.020141494,0.011563092,0.07650678,0.011638604,0.046193685,0.12548827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.77413535,0.006939509,0.004130889,0.01494868,0.02297988,0.021158274,0.019284526,0.03967803,0.1476765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029862134,0.00011006839,0.0012441989,0.0018111266,0.00023254081,0.00068887084,0.0032484022,0.0002001985,0.0014898254,0.087237,0.8201398,0.08329936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025259,0.000048190355,0.0034869418,0.0026253269,0.00015098782,0.0010426246,0.0011875767,0.002160126,0.0018615965,0.112014025,0.8748805,0.0002895257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003736141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063503995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7170346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017357633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.105496444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88423127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996436809","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0226727","title":"Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: A qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Research Foundation; Leverhulme Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Gratitude; Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Space (punctuation); Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8034167113490062,"score_gpt":0.5691937306555053,"score_spread":0.2342229806935009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996436809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971584,0.0017551826,0.0067850742,0.0065420778,0.00015845528,0.00054226676,0.002074748,0.000041911902,0.010516313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98620284,0.0014518148,0.0046784347,0.0011851797,0.00005593752,0.0014631583,0.000710861,0.00009265921,0.004159049],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96163857,0.027441297,0.0027042227,0.0016529894,0.0053630844,0.0011998209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82204795,0.14338359,0.0138655165,0.002297354,0.016735017,0.0016705908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040212695,0.0003399061,0.00066234637,0.006119146,0.0037800183,0.0044953316,0.0009701276,0.001150631,0.0022521452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10554735,0.000475357,0.00037378244,0.0068701906,0.0054509393,0.00554687,0.0050454647,0.001303574,0.00046386602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009778653,0.000017825683,0.0062123863,0.0013903292,0.00001559289,0.00029475713,0.97179663,0.000050060302,0.0021885063,0.0035987967,0.0017959549,0.0125414515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007826518,0.00003626571,0.009246812,0.0010521472,0.000015663409,0.00015992469,0.9669575,0.00012457134,0.0007565962,0.0011260369,0.020483894,0.0000327663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036658307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071940534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99388087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006869309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062031583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21266758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996663025","doi":"10.18438/eblip29623","title":"Library Supported Open Access Funds: Criteria, Impact, and Viability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Business; Demographics; Impact factor; Index (typography); Accounting; Library science; Computer science; Finance; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.36803992851377104,"score_gpt":0.5709500403995352,"score_spread":0.2029101118857642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996663025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92227495,0.008348316,0.006050976,0.008097672,0.00024537646,0.00057043915,0.0030268978,0.00015984138,0.05122552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994101,0.0008854031,0.002657058,0.00014312362,0.00022823416,0.00021000204,0.00062694756,0.000027359081,0.0011208705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9047222,0.036130372,0.012901853,0.0024440114,0.039710082,0.0040914523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5158814,0.27931693,0.10830101,0.014500636,0.06662861,0.0153714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08071383,0.00043876775,0.0009943391,0.036596205,0.0024926164,0.021082025,0.0019774204,0.001267676,0.007367395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34879974,0.00026205412,0.00078410015,0.044783853,0.004284917,0.012568937,0.010220436,0.00069648284,0.0011837019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064041733,0.0002640374,0.7737469,0.0011064591,0.00036274624,0.00031444608,0.0051372605,0.00082914816,0.00037472637,0.02244729,0.0053922767,0.18938431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013974818,0.0009858748,0.8707297,0.0033939127,0.000561129,0.00130066,0.033777993,0.0055146543,0.003089179,0.028192252,0.052076623,0.00023836804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021424885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024035207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053976253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076296395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42686063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997223030","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919000799","title":"Open Access and Academic Journals in Canada: A Political Science Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Politics; Scholarly communication; Political science; Publication; Public relations; Research council; Library science; Work (physics); Revenue; Public administration; Sociology; Publishing; Business; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.6166086716854868,"score_gpt":0.6363500773005246,"score_spread":0.019741405615037788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997223030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0620874,0.028385295,0.0011048412,0.59210163,0.0015764945,0.00016838007,0.0016506213,0.00010067108,0.3128246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979408,0.02216526,0.0014488061,0.043018796,0.0015604033,0.00008474793,0.00054965314,0.00007990365,0.03315163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96687317,0.002974541,0.00097432855,0.0014455076,0.018204374,0.009528185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9033214,0.020049326,0.0073549957,0.0010269166,0.04462438,0.023623101],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009432733,0.00046213067,0.0010452081,0.014864647,0.03146889,0.0343919,0.0036729209,0.00679796,0.014475104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039536517,0.00064170564,0.000725014,0.02569709,0.0179362,0.0062069045,0.005642896,0.0076893466,0.00069968816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007591097,0.000111426445,0.014162447,0.00042167757,0.00006157603,0.0006045563,0.004563167,0.0010033541,0.00029168083,0.8755544,0.07556625,0.027583506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015854962,0.000102347614,0.10017893,0.0018956886,0.00016879934,0.00042829712,0.027327472,0.0038486815,0.0006673479,0.12892462,0.73583025,0.0004690371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99401975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.33030215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47398964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7767546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998069622","doi":"","title":"Innovation and Expanding Horizons within Research at the University of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New horizons; Regional science; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.6617326890072415,"score_gpt":0.5625533020659698,"score_spread":0.09917938694127171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998069622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94978076,0.0040941383,0.00040334137,0.014988115,0.00010319548,0.000061789375,0.00052002183,0.00004981563,0.02999896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976703,0.0030425494,0.0013703778,0.00074386975,0.000050148305,0.000044118893,0.00020010771,0.000017523478,0.017828347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966653,0.0009609625,0.00014054881,0.00029945455,0.001196164,0.00073757797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977453,0.005615323,0.0017315408,0.00044043723,0.0055646836,0.009194999],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244972,0.0001878542,0.00032290007,0.0063507603,0.009283666,0.00913328,0.0011675722,0.00085802906,0.0055173268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011432482,0.00029327802,0.00021874996,0.009735152,0.0023873535,0.0020663233,0.0037560598,0.0012187086,0.00056271337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003337418,0.0004652176,0.72321165,0.0003755208,0.000088081884,0.0013200173,0.06969838,0.000744635,0.0056760763,0.023976402,0.009729452,0.1643808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028010743,0.00014694942,0.83978134,0.0005392538,0.0000794687,0.00040490387,0.09350687,0.0014219774,0.0020578615,0.0035279165,0.05842948,0.00007589685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6503723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8706132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029330594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101323105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70337343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998095279","doi":"10.1002/asi.24330","title":"The citation advantage of promoted articles in a cross‐publisher distribution platform: A 12‐month randomized controlled trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Confidence interval; Citation; Internal medicine; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.09548717587147706,"score_gpt":0.45004287221649125,"score_spread":0.35455569634501416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998095279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97410005,0.010670746,0.0010608202,0.0011163057,0.0018954099,0.00894779,0.00048018742,0.00014851976,0.001580016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711184,0.004399039,0.003947374,0.0009177188,0.0014669091,0.015524229,0.0003414576,0.000021554475,0.0022635069],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952643,0.0026131733,0.00060272857,0.0006843015,0.00048211138,0.0003534745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899447,0.0047007278,0.0026019467,0.00057789363,0.0006633398,0.0015114334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054287277,0.0012400339,0.0035945536,0.0009528225,0.0010279929,0.0018584516,0.0011596339,0.0042015733,0.008774015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013326145,0.0008854298,0.0027831912,0.0013444435,0.0017036727,0.0023219183,0.0009160112,0.0034078702,0.0010371652],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.95295703,0.022393921,0.0012386935,0.0020064346,0.0014243643,0.000035514604,0.000084189705,0.000116398725,0.00070550933,0.00010981801,0.00043295175,0.018495321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8312646,0.16215365,0.0032176909,0.00025703147,0.0015011828,0.000025851026,0.000057829457,0.00027295024,0.0004760142,0.0001904744,0.0005588973,0.000023714905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080457184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010391506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99904716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008875588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02935201},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"randomized_trial","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"randomized_trial","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2998153594","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.1.2018-0047","title":"How Far Apart Are L and M? The Institutional and Publishing Disconnects between LIS and Museum Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Publication; Discipline; Scholarly communication; The arts; Political science; Higher education; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4553739326490477,"score_gpt":0.48933954987135586,"score_spread":0.033965617222308175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998153594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.598739,0.025936019,0.004695609,0.06998771,0.0005135001,0.000054488977,0.00022798602,0.000106473635,0.29973924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906194,0.0029178238,0.0007123669,0.00238753,0.00019876228,0.000035258945,0.0000444779,0.000033356344,0.0030510589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718935,0.0077966065,0.0005575524,0.0011441088,0.0018223881,0.0014899126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659927,0.016579311,0.00474153,0.0026656233,0.0034284745,0.0065923487],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010864025,0.00018769324,0.00076700875,0.008663048,0.010313551,0.023674658,0.0018787903,0.0018877652,0.007038153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04087197,0.00053580885,0.00046402856,0.015584977,0.028015269,0.019081185,0.0096221715,0.002455275,0.0012196336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002114639,0.000119553944,0.08981524,0.00077462866,0.00010059273,0.0005192721,0.501784,0.00011544591,0.0006503362,0.23038188,0.005691838,0.16983564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034208915,0.00012076233,0.19761296,0.0017357733,0.00006634468,0.0005670923,0.60569227,0.00013076763,0.00037682184,0.054852907,0.13873754,0.00007259695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025216047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031126069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99133694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007023189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009308777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057455122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998363348","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03339-x","title":"The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Web of science; Political science; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.40245736986760666,"score_gpt":0.5294233401406908,"score_spread":0.12696597027308415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998363348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721614,0.0023755205,0.00042297962,0.0029353676,0.00008425253,0.000022346725,0.0005727888,0.000040117946,0.021385208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.00028663225,0.0000775164,0.000065742024,0.000054818574,0.0000050564777,0.00010901123,0.000004260821,0.0014890231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732447,0.00052999955,0.00026163372,0.00027422694,0.00092286296,0.0006867874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98323154,0.004982883,0.0037193443,0.00060664304,0.0036285007,0.003831079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030453727,0.00018781301,0.0004729696,0.010384246,0.0026374375,0.0061457735,0.00083381607,0.0007768839,0.0071341167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011950441,0.00015400157,0.00040642178,0.012082272,0.0015521011,0.003137837,0.0022461612,0.0005898457,0.0005770917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016249873,0.00011977105,0.8928798,0.00022477879,0.00021672707,0.000527448,0.0024954176,0.0011132018,0.0010600705,0.029106718,0.0045631193,0.067530565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019416852,0.00006174831,0.9826317,0.000063306376,0.000099591976,0.00008007677,0.0022011162,0.0028247247,0.00031253078,0.003929456,0.007752264,0.000023998573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031873427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046442347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00825647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06337583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998826136","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scz060","title":"The effect of collaboration with top-funded scholars on scientific production","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public funding; Production (economics); Political science; Private sector; Grant funding; Economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.2052903149857554,"score_gpt":0.524984266830868,"score_spread":0.31969395184511257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998826136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677815,0.0010895404,0.0009059397,0.0030911448,0.000059035858,0.000042117415,0.00062210695,0.000053775984,0.026354823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990928,0.00011869475,0.000120643854,0.00003679893,0.000032324308,0.000011545775,0.00006797572,0.000003380257,0.0005158644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812245,0.010095338,0.00077384675,0.0011846045,0.0040771337,0.002644531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6590099,0.19770397,0.0721212,0.0065856716,0.023474924,0.041104317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012370408,0.00029065952,0.0009232382,0.005121153,0.002342447,0.006687179,0.001080733,0.0014591286,0.011053056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095748566,0.0001666949,0.0004532594,0.007948534,0.0024748517,0.002250198,0.0041041644,0.0012804071,0.0011686962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005019606,0.0005047571,0.9653817,0.00018053013,0.000370499,0.00047597883,0.0014164763,0.0035021969,0.0005662478,0.0035437534,0.0023195995,0.021236299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086283224,0.00024987102,0.98370105,0.0001382697,0.00016908198,0.00021794782,0.005131359,0.002903735,0.0005893414,0.0030647246,0.0037131265,0.000035236266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04101264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033280827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006674029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009038118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08154786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001161520","doi":"10.2196/11567","title":"The Most-Cited Authors Who Published Papers in JMIR mHealth and uHealth Using the Authorship-Weighted Scheme: Bibliometric Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR mhealth and uhealth","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; mHealth; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Centrality; Citation; Node (physics); Social network analysis; Scheme (mathematics); Data science; Information retrieval; Data mining; World Wide Web; Social media; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.44396058215574663,"score_gpt":0.5561299710683189,"score_spread":0.11216938891257222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001161520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.899953,0.019706117,0.013921871,0.0017669162,0.0004700444,0.0028035762,0.030305935,0.00041383167,0.030658694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95597565,0.006449734,0.025242928,0.00011672845,0.00027749894,0.001952489,0.0077979146,0.00006652896,0.002120458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839129,0.0026642457,0.0051575517,0.0014627681,0.0062879883,0.00051455444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379033,0.028551538,0.016329763,0.0020175271,0.013312962,0.0018849394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014672814,0.00073522597,0.001330268,0.09007587,0.0016527151,0.0046481844,0.0011371927,0.0008262403,0.0033975502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09509914,0.0003237882,0.0015822878,0.08341406,0.0008690585,0.0038765545,0.0027401836,0.000511207,0.00085309776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006873216,0.00019469227,0.71100086,0.012304197,0.001500092,0.0005638286,0.008311656,0.0019959612,0.0019349622,0.0050084917,0.009894071,0.24660392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002181778,0.00046554845,0.8701537,0.0034595302,0.003780137,0.0024403422,0.014256016,0.018249955,0.0044928137,0.019445457,0.06272141,0.00031686548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027825586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037158343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038262683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077598214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002594776","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scz062","title":"Canadian Science Meets Parliament: Building relationships between scientists and policymakers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; Cape Breton University; Laurentian University; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Toronto; Western University; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of Manitoba; Royal Military College of Canada; Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Event (particle physics); Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.6079505841042503,"score_gpt":0.5504148990321218,"score_spread":0.05753568507212847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002594776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1191778,0.003394225,0.0076938,0.628583,0.004843237,0.0011365538,0.00095584145,0.00040099878,0.2338146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034494,0.0016866424,0.006285356,0.04704782,0.0007976593,0.0007335722,0.00058672874,0.00017870545,0.039234206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91186833,0.045496367,0.0011417822,0.0037459382,0.016845485,0.020902064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83738834,0.048237078,0.005812468,0.004923047,0.032694373,0.07094469],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07124776,0.0005634868,0.001141247,0.005547607,0.085732155,0.025479943,0.0049468237,0.00831292,0.016943632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097599596,0.0011134688,0.0007549994,0.008167632,0.020283226,0.008321821,0.024185784,0.014825484,0.0022313145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030091143,0.0002813526,0.026976112,0.0003597628,0.00012832669,0.0020589153,0.2699948,0.00075229834,0.0021170552,0.09950298,0.49414328,0.10338423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007108186,0.000046318644,0.010254601,0.00024149062,0.00003134193,0.00006684595,0.16078341,0.00045391388,0.00040421518,0.010884671,0.8166607,0.00010145879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8180206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8957223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14584094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35482422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99070346},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3003267280","doi":"10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-4-228-247","title":"THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Research and Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; World Wide Web; Citation analysis; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Geography; Internal medicine; Meta-analysis; Statistics; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5742008247629874,"score_gpt":0.6164333840370883,"score_spread":0.042232559274100856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003267280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96472657,0.0052700257,0.0014501227,0.0010207794,0.00006035077,0.00024114951,0.02100134,0.00011256636,0.006117029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116916,0.0027675328,0.0019301985,0.00034951326,0.00024364381,0.00033699346,0.012015316,0.000120453566,0.0010670979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830496,0.0033689453,0.003935193,0.0024513525,0.006347062,0.0008478073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79993874,0.0753607,0.08328031,0.011759895,0.023919279,0.005741088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013144218,0.00039248247,0.00080525375,0.024831494,0.0013601779,0.0047156,0.0014910316,0.0010084651,0.003874563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08927786,0.00056306267,0.0013993364,0.02907943,0.0017686295,0.005352458,0.0039307894,0.0011689946,0.002116394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089451074,0.0000645477,0.98281693,0.0004633472,0.00026592572,0.0001333884,0.0019966047,0.000064904794,0.00027110986,0.0003873372,0.0026310144,0.010815435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008642036,0.000048469872,0.991176,0.0002082103,0.00014236676,0.00040780182,0.0025660119,0.0003350266,0.0002348348,0.00024658098,0.004595863,0.000030091493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008248107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010605531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010691233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017445151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069514155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004189244","doi":"10.22148/001c.11824","title":"Send us your null results","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Null (SQL); Null hypothesis; Code (set theory); Statistical power; Econometrics; Computer science; Power (physics); Statistics; Data science; Mathematics; Data mining; Physics; Programming language","score_opus":0.7901292379649458,"score_gpt":0.6004316014343586,"score_spread":0.18969763653058724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004189244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032808125,0.0023142856,0.079198115,0.21959472,0.1385275,0.0023849735,0.14307432,0.030888218,0.3512098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29136539,0.003456441,0.06608754,0.0767033,0.019371744,0.008006327,0.073374934,0.013231975,0.44840235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066204,0.004036823,0.00080754474,0.0010640298,0.002591144,0.0008384965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90271777,0.056779735,0.004716702,0.01680539,0.015632356,0.0033481305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012452702,0.0015791098,0.0013059805,0.0031067939,0.002792193,0.006494214,0.0021849275,0.00568825,0.49479303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16315131,0.00070013705,0.0020560767,0.0023587325,0.001361811,0.0038435243,0.0038056746,0.0047387993,0.29075652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094352325,0.00013984347,0.004851913,0.0004404798,0.00013177269,0.00049887295,0.00039530956,0.00031521232,0.0002688283,0.01729997,0.9003764,0.07433788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011935803,0.0006777369,0.007635761,0.0016988984,0.00034587612,0.0030616855,0.0030494102,0.0028738717,0.004169272,0.12286587,0.8521091,0.00031904865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011082656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077610655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010992477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027978057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72061646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004444638","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: Chicago 16th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Library science; History; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.4304604824637775,"score_gpt":0.5349106240665301,"score_spread":0.10445014160275262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004444638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013237899,0.018927988,0.039529786,0.008359782,0.013053507,0.0018687205,0.2785724,0.048232373,0.5901317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004225065,0.028466372,0.08085404,0.002154898,0.003108448,0.0050425655,0.23327531,0.02008495,0.6227884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186397,0.0013745375,0.0015943827,0.0004741024,0.0044546654,0.00023841728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674646,0.008737271,0.001782569,0.0026173545,0.018468684,0.00092952745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056754705,0.0024912984,0.0028883845,0.029848684,0.0023213285,0.009790359,0.0030115328,0.0018853679,0.30497798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0338385,0.0021905224,0.001068006,0.049199022,0.0010776931,0.008606275,0.003075918,0.00457538,0.36096436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014972653,0.000014724422,0.00010655183,0.00043585539,0.00000563327,0.000011344195,0.00007741977,0.000097651464,0.00010054086,0.0024624856,0.9504216,0.046251338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008873692,0.000012187384,0.00067692035,0.0004402025,0.0000050826047,0.00004745379,0.00006232634,0.00013001265,0.00013093791,0.002874846,0.99558866,0.000022485787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011350537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025938865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30497798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002906471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128501365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99136454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004511502","doi":"","title":"L’Université Jean Monnet et l’Université d’Ottawa signent une convention de coopération scientifique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2780296047095412,"score_gpt":0.4727365369301849,"score_spread":0.19470693222064372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004511502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053346746,0.025954276,0.018538559,0.30740047,0.044235002,0.00072989194,0.01599292,0.0032035683,0.5305985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08226418,0.0030606305,0.009240255,0.004395383,0.0010238476,0.0002570657,0.001759525,0.00058434106,0.89741486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809321,0.0023860321,0.00094416254,0.0021478664,0.008864493,0.0047253533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643232,0.0063532745,0.001771529,0.0034232282,0.012782651,0.011346108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00903258,0.0019414381,0.002317405,0.0035001491,0.009663889,0.015826805,0.0028279717,0.009090349,0.12971942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018915372,0.0015812019,0.0020034239,0.0031939568,0.006530037,0.0053421333,0.005725687,0.010757055,0.022907455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013810806,0.00021371213,0.007090675,0.0007272912,0.00016824235,0.0014035755,0.0026394909,0.0022703072,0.008628898,0.29102537,0.61164373,0.07280762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007873016,0.000030238507,0.008260311,0.00009960857,0.000013047496,0.00014753758,0.00051032036,0.000360574,0.001676497,0.002210968,0.98652816,0.00008394501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6870751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7508834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6870751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04850258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10737948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62953556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004755503","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: Need help?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Geography; World Wide Web; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4887741113448896,"score_gpt":0.5461906142176708,"score_spread":0.05741650287278122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004755503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051194,0.0093455445,0.06676909,0.039725047,0.019906875,0.0030316464,0.18494616,0.10858576,0.5625705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007627205,0.013368818,0.2015592,0.008164786,0.0038847416,0.0050398447,0.12115375,0.032447338,0.6067543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418074,0.001088672,0.0012019959,0.00023243691,0.0031055051,0.00019071769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549094,0.014719925,0.0021361269,0.0029991355,0.023781516,0.0014539022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004746745,0.0016560347,0.001938314,0.01487057,0.0016441646,0.0065133967,0.0025568025,0.0023713852,0.20128012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05687518,0.0014392738,0.00064481073,0.023322698,0.00087378424,0.008146795,0.0027916047,0.003686739,0.21608096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016573078,0.000023831479,0.00016095418,0.00027516735,0.0000035016062,0.000021444395,0.000106257576,0.00007204168,0.0001491772,0.0013127286,0.92812467,0.06973366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016871687,0.000017222426,0.00085352827,0.0003067044,0.000003863594,0.00009648001,0.000114714225,0.00020996963,0.00023743398,0.0027344178,0.995378,0.000030724615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023780145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20128012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002141878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008399547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6733491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006156524","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561","title":"Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; University of Ottawa; Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Outreach; Snowball sampling; Delphi method; Publishing; Checklist; Public relations; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.7858935230383207,"score_gpt":0.6547070806373642,"score_spread":0.13118644240095656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006156524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39520136,0.0010510962,0.31900948,0.019422024,0.0007745406,0.24063137,0.0010224205,0.00054134167,0.022346405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49493554,0.0009950335,0.36184973,0.0048471703,0.00013478565,0.13283023,0.00045798914,0.00013050585,0.0038190521],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.68725306,0.2672342,0.016949574,0.0059778336,0.014375371,0.008210004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8207075,0.108525634,0.008407125,0.009154566,0.046057306,0.0071477974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27058822,0.0017023012,0.0011953299,0.006192755,0.007201973,0.0055611366,0.0040623015,0.0045149503,0.005373175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17413718,0.0021713306,0.002127286,0.0040244176,0.009235464,0.00809898,0.017154947,0.0050033904,0.0017690059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015152734,0.0008947008,0.012205884,0.0060387105,0.00018905004,0.001677809,0.7897882,0.0060027693,0.0141733,0.022671498,0.019956604,0.12488617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010147237,0.003256475,0.021630475,0.008454736,0.00015461205,0.0016200384,0.7253298,0.024721019,0.009061634,0.055435915,0.14847669,0.000843896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060824435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066591115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99548507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010338105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036591522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8994946},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3006456429","doi":"10.3386/w26752","title":"Stagnation and Scientific Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.9232644462540172,"score_gpt":0.7214025480609675,"score_spread":0.20186189819304967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006456429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64078337,0.01389479,0.07941799,0.06763937,0.0007704539,0.00041845487,0.0015278923,0.000679989,0.19486766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867313,0.0015859272,0.004384581,0.0011112886,0.00029219707,0.00015637737,0.00015284044,0.000045701647,0.005539858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787224,0.009723781,0.0014454847,0.0021842306,0.0053717033,0.0025524166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8825972,0.055075243,0.030355204,0.0063775047,0.014557243,0.011037546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029036006,0.00057040405,0.0017321217,0.0055120257,0.0030307989,0.009993826,0.0012330743,0.003690459,0.008181592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12543942,0.00053470535,0.00081518496,0.0071985195,0.007038759,0.00947187,0.0049111326,0.0025479272,0.0013099343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040992867,0.00022378232,0.07467699,0.00047420527,0.00018905924,0.0002922624,0.002723863,0.015439084,0.00086315145,0.8192315,0.009787114,0.07568905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014347107,0.0002674596,0.030163782,0.00025848398,0.000067696645,0.00017972355,0.00091778964,0.014399517,0.0005342842,0.9171315,0.035837293,0.00009908764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003176241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002113699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009834462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008300174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15355891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006487896","doi":"","title":"AUTUMN/STEP and POLARIS EHB: Spanning Canada With Research Magnetometers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AGUSM","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetometer; History; Physics","score_opus":0.6373386149683724,"score_gpt":0.5951032734904066,"score_spread":0.042235341477965815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006487896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63815117,0.0021595033,0.011632401,0.022108989,0.0011303637,0.00090922817,0.069571234,0.0032758538,0.25106126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7733652,0.0005216837,0.024529738,0.0023624562,0.00010295012,0.0002559191,0.014532364,0.00035220338,0.18397747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982114,0.00016617167,0.000049879032,0.00021194738,0.00059916615,0.0007615265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944554,0.00029042666,0.00021905,0.00030862496,0.0035164075,0.0012101058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020652509,0.0003488242,0.00033848325,0.0022373344,0.003516459,0.0029530649,0.0011211765,0.0009850806,0.010891016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003847791,0.00031908765,0.0002929092,0.0051358333,0.00054061075,0.0011216748,0.0014015336,0.0010097158,0.0017740494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020386463,0.00032628342,0.26490375,0.0004319584,0.00015350833,0.00045270773,0.004285221,0.004484436,0.01156724,0.019991864,0.41018367,0.2811808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018554395,0.0001552426,0.5893357,0.00014116193,0.00007980846,0.00010088532,0.009321429,0.0038548892,0.0067470297,0.0019406464,0.38802326,0.00011436799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97276974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027230263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017804457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061771344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12918097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008285975","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.2.01","title":"Exporting China’s Scholarly Books: Current Conditions for Chinese Publishers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Negotiation; Quality (philosophy); Subsidy; State (computer science); Intellectual property; Economics; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Political science; Law; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.3997333539609277,"score_gpt":0.534722518974928,"score_spread":0.13498916501400027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008285975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852212,0.0024716274,0.000085623935,0.0048879944,0.000029476489,0.000014086734,0.00025691825,0.000013336047,0.0070196493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150366,0.00413991,0.00012224916,0.00033684587,0.00011006377,0.000017399027,0.00044802026,0.0000067752694,0.0033151116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982948,0.0002070719,0.00025075162,0.0002514266,0.00055031496,0.00044571472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435943,0.0015949337,0.0015720839,0.00016237215,0.0010089842,0.001302297],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017587127,0.0002135513,0.00053470227,0.0027098013,0.0040362445,0.007757111,0.0010043475,0.0009703985,0.00770375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039326176,0.0003451451,0.00023982997,0.0070843096,0.0018635712,0.0053556883,0.0018635996,0.0008075121,0.0004946518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027135923,0.00026636533,0.82140535,0.0011332176,0.000059238737,0.009319158,0.043376494,0.00070303783,0.00245327,0.018014766,0.009945689,0.093052074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003046029,0.00013078295,0.7801324,0.00022082897,0.000054857133,0.0022418518,0.16775498,0.0017207538,0.0011855838,0.0038696146,0.04254154,0.00011622063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03279189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032499433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003745127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062841554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009643737","doi":"10.17511/ijphr.2018.i1.06","title":"Cost in high impact journals: The problem for researchers from low and middle income countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Review International Journal of Public Health Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Promotion (chess); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; Library science; Sample (material); Publishing; Political science; Computer science; Business; Geography; World Wide Web; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.9278262047464299,"score_gpt":0.7275617858558884,"score_spread":0.20026441889054147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009643737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5996081,0.1470936,0.015189637,0.1589103,0.004963315,0.0022625646,0.011572482,0.000389084,0.060010802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93203646,0.0286789,0.012659016,0.014181699,0.0031017475,0.001684957,0.0017528635,0.00020979859,0.005694458],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9083471,0.04331797,0.014073416,0.0044532632,0.027286595,0.0025217845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51988316,0.34374073,0.082999654,0.01404461,0.030510528,0.008821293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052990578,0.00053236657,0.0017741801,0.00755303,0.0023202952,0.009229261,0.0022516309,0.0016727662,0.015862398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22711399,0.0005691338,0.0014480554,0.020363122,0.0029747796,0.0068189153,0.0033288116,0.001443417,0.0022466006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001710576,0.00056452665,0.3143187,0.01821953,0.0010464343,0.0019428697,0.010874805,0.0007918808,0.00068616885,0.015421852,0.068311125,0.56611156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035586546,0.0014376976,0.679362,0.02049677,0.0014022266,0.014766333,0.0374374,0.002120137,0.0017392193,0.03768098,0.202801,0.00040029385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003883451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004694815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94700944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051972615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066602887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2802443},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3009671763","doi":"10.1177/0961000620907958","title":"Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Information science; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.4194052641794983,"score_gpt":0.5149488567052041,"score_spread":0.09554359252570577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009671763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96848774,0.013432251,0.00051384873,0.000758471,0.000054398355,0.00006475076,0.008607354,0.000021474185,0.008059685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98233217,0.010341048,0.0012516129,0.00005881164,0.000085347776,0.00008981433,0.004477029,0.000018666708,0.0013454066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978738,0.00043402464,0.0005329644,0.00026286556,0.0006118205,0.00028459675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97189134,0.008836807,0.012844591,0.0006175151,0.00456027,0.0012494774],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024613568,0.0002551336,0.0003449936,0.030822419,0.0007317414,0.0029397376,0.0002812578,0.000321749,0.001684484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015543268,0.00017099893,0.00044842498,0.041571796,0.00041673915,0.0025416769,0.0016099388,0.00027035386,0.00054267765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014186752,0.000022520248,0.8968371,0.0017091794,0.00015142492,0.00075008464,0.012203829,0.0003319036,0.0012488576,0.001425192,0.0025020984,0.08267593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024718975,0.000019631536,0.9724478,0.00065132225,0.00006287594,0.00048437066,0.0106845265,0.00020382511,0.00040614343,0.00023024277,0.014791236,0.000015566153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084542325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010878038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011047133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023260675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01681006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010164141","doi":"","title":"La recherche-création : analyse de son adoption dans le monde universitaire au Québec.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.500420566366593,"score_gpt":0.45706706963777954,"score_spread":0.0433534967288135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010164141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.890102,0.007592201,0.002912502,0.017286427,0.0002286096,0.00032854982,0.0025800068,0.00025302917,0.0787168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402929,0.0018190965,0.002215571,0.0006147082,0.000034187517,0.00009317624,0.00047837285,0.0000535733,0.054398384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910245,0.0030876335,0.0002783529,0.0006198026,0.0037203415,0.0012693903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539791,0.013784107,0.0036481046,0.0017885715,0.019542437,0.007257738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010085092,0.0002722174,0.00039362494,0.0026969805,0.0045312056,0.0045523867,0.0014944772,0.0010110702,0.009065025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030493466,0.00029042157,0.00042717715,0.0051653907,0.0017268839,0.0017348289,0.002623247,0.0014911778,0.0010849527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048827985,0.00043812994,0.44160697,0.0005742651,0.00013824143,0.00085530325,0.08673606,0.0010819813,0.00326432,0.02563793,0.03830585,0.40087274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029892211,0.0002295736,0.75654113,0.0004754322,0.00005341145,0.00023033502,0.036200862,0.0019597653,0.0012554219,0.00057510874,0.20237416,0.00007493646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9170205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049449287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077220365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3587814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011072340","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2003.08283","title":"Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; Russian Foundation for Basic Research","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation impact; Scale (ratio); Political science; Geography; Chemistry; World Wide Web; Operations research; Computer science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7368958277052544,"score_gpt":0.3945571757697195,"score_spread":0.3423386519355349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011072340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749996,0.0060118837,0.00087131205,0.00078853,0.000050410574,0.000046567948,0.006952521,0.00012844586,0.010150575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922341,0.0017795799,0.000884592,0.000108565415,0.00007219351,0.000025645728,0.0038995352,0.00003715622,0.0009587323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98690945,0.002966201,0.002414612,0.0018909142,0.0047583524,0.0010605373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82128435,0.0719828,0.06576044,0.011749654,0.023393722,0.0058290698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010294236,0.00038091245,0.0010083017,0.032331858,0.0018538515,0.007057173,0.0007106917,0.00070785586,0.0029876016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059411034,0.00019550443,0.00061832374,0.049657702,0.0018492611,0.0039647664,0.0040700394,0.0007094074,0.0009697611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021744793,0.00007630076,0.94219786,0.00083054026,0.00035845564,0.00088698993,0.0040094317,0.0005492747,0.001114865,0.0030509802,0.0032378875,0.043469924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013700509,0.00013646127,0.9720424,0.00025724873,0.00022792649,0.0017574516,0.0074563227,0.00083527155,0.0010653323,0.0021759116,0.013967857,0.000064204694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00449333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99929214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009932393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015171965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05444181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011698931","doi":"","title":"Electronic Resources Management (ERM): A Scientometric Study of Global Publications during 1999-2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; Productivity; Library science; Per capita; Political science; Scientometrics; Geography; Business; Social science; Accounting; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Population; Computer science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3898018587868382,"score_gpt":0.5496885046335837,"score_spread":0.15988664584674545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011698931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950616,0.0062043117,0.00069582206,0.0008732468,0.00008826926,0.00012828756,0.019551955,0.0001157997,0.021726353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96915275,0.0051363893,0.0010189944,0.00014370623,0.00040605105,0.00018038832,0.01986584,0.000047296773,0.00404857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959883,0.0005245758,0.0008537116,0.00041019992,0.0018726998,0.0003504872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98051274,0.006365736,0.007605638,0.0009445838,0.0036230045,0.0009482319],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040151454,0.00050990225,0.00047091572,0.03790052,0.0008402546,0.0037532556,0.0006471185,0.0006554742,0.0022455864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019397113,0.00013653302,0.00067596877,0.08162194,0.0006689749,0.0046915608,0.0018021411,0.00035716093,0.0012820117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024208165,0.00022871773,0.8018633,0.0014808893,0.00017896295,0.0006778453,0.0059112264,0.0009498204,0.0008368341,0.0023877525,0.012873346,0.1723692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063469347,0.00012894765,0.96837705,0.00022244678,0.000056335954,0.00045553537,0.004384795,0.0005262617,0.0006917118,0.00038970693,0.024741327,0.000019579173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027967787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002491163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011117031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014286423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021234393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011709894","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0228914","title":"Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Prestige; Publishing; Audience measurement; Promotion (chess); Publication; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6983512650567966,"score_gpt":0.4912175993014682,"score_spread":0.20713366575532838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011709894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914125,0.0003766303,0.00025432368,0.0028390125,0.000023812916,0.000022555036,0.00009210914,0.000008924787,0.0049701976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991849,0.00013254884,0.00013975854,0.00014107961,0.000022445634,0.000008842544,0.00003629823,0.0000030339543,0.00033107246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98865825,0.0038719324,0.00093948713,0.0004392718,0.004857807,0.0012332931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82148963,0.0677133,0.05393354,0.0023467941,0.02396985,0.03054686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012955029,0.0001217494,0.00027212867,0.0021474937,0.0018793769,0.006631218,0.00080125703,0.0008217123,0.0017999226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10030928,0.00017637428,0.00021903006,0.0028266313,0.0022347504,0.0022648252,0.0015495968,0.0011659041,0.00044567595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015310511,0.00020719408,0.9541347,0.00010013214,0.000051740117,0.00023465788,0.020950852,0.00012808733,0.0005702877,0.0008959013,0.001424541,0.021148792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023146753,0.00023179548,0.9218773,0.00010277184,0.000028041275,0.00034549795,0.06970789,0.00050160586,0.0005615732,0.0015295409,0.005042636,0.00004822988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019534329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026345218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003303534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007931669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012059513","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v13i1.533","title":"“Let’s Make Submissions Easier”: Revised Author Guidelines at IJTMB","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Computer science; Library science; Operations research; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7022108339471691,"score_gpt":0.7069395311075087,"score_spread":0.004728697160339634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012059513","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017579737,0.003122428,0.0058566555,0.13104221,0.8424554,0.0020063946,0.0010797246,0.0025223405,0.011739065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028901498,0.0123058595,0.026543545,0.09641644,0.7191433,0.004469164,0.0031764992,0.004650336,0.13040477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90904254,0.022973148,0.027527291,0.004002028,0.03350118,0.0029537175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5404068,0.0575263,0.030058192,0.018356573,0.33064485,0.023007223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07545075,0.002499336,0.004516436,0.009079784,0.004743601,0.023159852,0.006594287,0.013667341,0.1034327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2956741,0.002563841,0.0037233266,0.0064094216,0.004840225,0.010176332,0.005228053,0.018365787,0.22270836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033792097,0.00002392679,0.000031500225,0.00037183595,0.000008852593,0.000048546593,0.000044718017,0.000025256382,0.0001435145,0.00031184955,0.9851002,0.013856056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006391903,0.000035477056,0.0003465662,0.0010104557,0.000015949961,0.00022216406,0.00008438889,0.00016511706,0.00037165123,0.001557915,0.9960736,0.00005268185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014105398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035313447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004809463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016578268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39902645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012585693","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.20.997783","title":"A comparative analysis reveals irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project; Brock University","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Search engine; Scopus; Information retrieval; Computer science; Web of science; Cornerstone; Scientific literature; Data science; Keyword search; Search analytics; World Wide Web; Web search query; Geography; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.40596392155440814,"score_gpt":0.4769058233067329,"score_spread":0.07094190175232479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012585693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520466,0.014922702,0.015294505,0.0015922632,0.0001761684,0.0005748579,0.0041606505,0.0006155054,0.010616794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872552,0.0012018956,0.0079387585,0.00016012616,0.000073703595,0.0003295118,0.0024442768,0.00022223579,0.00037421746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.65747344,0.19736165,0.05911666,0.025042739,0.05745644,0.0035490054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14498718,0.67854095,0.076464616,0.07610992,0.022199543,0.0016977658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18814343,0.00074736995,0.0022789543,0.029663358,0.0017871726,0.00817733,0.0030170383,0.0015166056,0.002757339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66667396,0.0009419794,0.0029780723,0.033417083,0.0045905807,0.008395854,0.007205666,0.0012013905,0.0009140156],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008873896,0.00027111074,0.63986695,0.012904958,0.019648654,0.0030003227,0.04337889,0.0033727135,0.014992701,0.014694785,0.00602033,0.2329746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005783084,0.0026871024,0.88039094,0.00410583,0.0069814413,0.005825469,0.018119011,0.009729683,0.0110191,0.030152177,0.029921496,0.00048944546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016642166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025178266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021833698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028574865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013013892","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p214","title":"Publishing at Any Cost? The Need for the Improvement of the Quality of Scholarly Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Dynamism; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Open access publishing; Public relations; Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Scholarly communication; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; History","score_opus":0.6183508697685842,"score_gpt":0.604278366962529,"score_spread":0.01407250280605521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013013892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026116945,0.027569063,0.008748933,0.8624618,0.0072220983,0.00010449071,0.00020304618,0.00021787788,0.06735575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7249747,0.040640708,0.027459797,0.14086239,0.025844146,0.00038389757,0.00042837858,0.00059032015,0.038815755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593694,0.014696223,0.0018725455,0.0026455862,0.019420343,0.0019959356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7170331,0.16880046,0.028233511,0.022854555,0.041386887,0.021691583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032230612,0.0004130392,0.0015320997,0.0031046679,0.003790314,0.032026432,0.00244823,0.0057478864,0.018832954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18652742,0.00032428556,0.0007410562,0.0058828085,0.008111359,0.03609806,0.0048113894,0.008298008,0.005664147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025156044,0.00021358396,0.010516367,0.0024743525,0.00015307145,0.0004859252,0.0045696124,0.00038868788,0.0015056793,0.4289237,0.13026413,0.42025334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006177854,0.0002874774,0.01552506,0.0031905079,0.00015089774,0.00181246,0.012673948,0.0010001482,0.0014766525,0.27759686,0.68605304,0.00017117962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016039655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016366208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058151335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013075307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17045385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013381084","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.26.007435","title":"Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Discontinuation; Medicine; Citation; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Library science; Political science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.44267548871336615,"score_gpt":0.48936587655001523,"score_spread":0.04669038783664908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013381084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95428693,0.011381755,0.0034722672,0.0020037647,0.00022228007,0.0005296855,0.018047493,0.00042249847,0.009633342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784581,0.0021768315,0.004412127,0.00023480559,0.00030024102,0.0005517966,0.01260467,0.00020485479,0.0010565219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93969095,0.012143502,0.014723263,0.003476336,0.027331647,0.0026343763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53451717,0.17534235,0.18263902,0.016141303,0.07793814,0.013422069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056106213,0.0009503442,0.0020456917,0.054924827,0.0016232004,0.00914373,0.0017788623,0.0009160579,0.003254401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24390954,0.00038394824,0.0023696914,0.08220574,0.0020283908,0.0049528903,0.00619493,0.00092527294,0.0010007719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095631316,0.00011678366,0.91635895,0.0026213366,0.001567415,0.00039297272,0.0023434535,0.0008202433,0.00052003807,0.0017949025,0.008369929,0.06413762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007774085,0.0003629804,0.97944415,0.0007672615,0.0007356556,0.0006080233,0.0021400196,0.0019694227,0.0007711899,0.0023159527,0.01073399,0.000073626376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004031327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037709055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94507515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039558355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057546757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29672152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013587006","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.11779","title":"Studying the scientific mobility and international collaboration funded by the China Scholarship Council","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Political science; China; Funding Agency; Agency (philosophy); Mainland China; Library science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7470983581590277,"score_gpt":0.4243628991278098,"score_spread":0.3227354590312179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013587006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89499325,0.009716212,0.0016904125,0.00984737,0.00040979835,0.00013756516,0.006483621,0.00010746002,0.076614276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011713,0.0021920144,0.00074750534,0.00017307249,0.00014318783,0.00012921615,0.0025653932,0.000019319392,0.003913237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98611397,0.002774601,0.0015924423,0.0009153578,0.0074901273,0.0011135172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415625,0.01608174,0.013913983,0.004378726,0.016794203,0.0072688456],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013096134,0.00025791838,0.00093149696,0.01769893,0.0026482856,0.0040211314,0.00077278964,0.00062984775,0.0044074403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060670976,0.00014538088,0.0003770136,0.06110822,0.0013690986,0.0031574636,0.004854894,0.0005894498,0.00052801793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017160791,0.00016127221,0.74872214,0.0007975491,0.000445372,0.00052248384,0.010934966,0.0016695202,0.00047383184,0.04450747,0.032435607,0.15915826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002887566,0.000055599983,0.9300419,0.0003496887,0.000125868,0.00010070832,0.0049291537,0.0016042087,0.0002923255,0.0047895364,0.057650693,0.000031530955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038581967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034790505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98230106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054191123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01621856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07671481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013695337","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00038","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Affect (linguistics); Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.7557475091659885,"score_gpt":0.6168525148930493,"score_spread":0.13889499427293928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013695337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739578,0.0059129796,0.00014163715,0.0005013557,0.000057512018,0.000035406963,0.009908669,0.000016181835,0.009468597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941046,0.0023689661,0.00034529893,0.00005378612,0.000034140805,0.000040769137,0.005047412,0.000009365408,0.0026897397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979432,0.00029552061,0.00037610435,0.00023534484,0.00080755836,0.0003423176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824332,0.004150919,0.0049260724,0.0006066114,0.006893771,0.0009894308],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042159283,0.00023183668,0.0006396991,0.01381514,0.00065436104,0.0014462213,0.00041422134,0.00020659792,0.0022970943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016412597,0.00012560036,0.0006696535,0.019245582,0.0004555256,0.0008031612,0.0014049527,0.00028886355,0.00032297705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028317844,0.000027772552,0.95039636,0.0009804841,0.00058034284,0.0001936609,0.0042856922,0.00040307236,0.00058538,0.001004062,0.0030128672,0.038247123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044970657,0.00001717474,0.9949326,0.00012101094,0.00008212448,0.000038008995,0.0014136991,0.000060568367,0.00018952064,0.000056697212,0.0030776088,0.000006578532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14254759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21545678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99578404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025576951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039592697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28343576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013994608","doi":"10.18438/eblip29667","title":"The Types of Publications Read by Finnish Scholars Vary with Their Purposes for Reading","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Newspaper; Documentation; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.30020067427163205,"score_gpt":0.4651800349606386,"score_spread":0.16497936068900654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013994608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006967,0.023885248,0.0015817881,0.003737143,0.0004786842,0.00007978253,0.0017005256,0.00010342591,0.06773669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97451335,0.013956262,0.0012313145,0.0005095501,0.00025128602,0.00007152034,0.001123953,0.00006945316,0.0082733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918972,0.0021254069,0.0014627288,0.0009903908,0.0027719396,0.00075229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500934,0.034388874,0.0064261146,0.0020053315,0.005123677,0.0019625858],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064242356,0.00030832688,0.00045577664,0.009440975,0.0024587323,0.008649471,0.0009003386,0.0013399574,0.006733626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047994755,0.000323307,0.0007545132,0.013356876,0.0021164645,0.00846049,0.0032142974,0.0007853007,0.0022214805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027004277,0.000119620316,0.42830032,0.0034986145,0.00022717401,0.0026127866,0.26521,0.00017861713,0.004787072,0.0064821206,0.011457647,0.27685598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036027173,0.0001693242,0.61727685,0.003961463,0.00027734888,0.0038091058,0.27831683,0.00023054323,0.0027346206,0.005214652,0.08783982,0.0001333787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029735507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051147556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99055904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001564946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002439342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033975005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014707999","doi":"10.29173/cjs29365","title":"Gender and Academic Promotion to Full Professor in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Salary; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Geography; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7823003432242429,"score_gpt":0.5557691220071066,"score_spread":0.2265312212171363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014707999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95733917,0.0053377394,0.00014073473,0.0042316606,0.00020953124,0.000051327912,0.0058673075,0.000032642187,0.026789835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876024,0.0014718437,0.000084942316,0.00032177175,0.00004171972,0.000017184324,0.00070991495,0.000015424215,0.009734891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970542,0.00018327528,0.00013653428,0.00030117587,0.0013072306,0.0010176179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990842,0.0006515266,0.0024884057,0.00022857478,0.0026747384,0.003114798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016381525,0.00020734465,0.0006559751,0.0022523939,0.0041029775,0.0023813783,0.00095238903,0.00045052255,0.0077413344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073673488,0.00030393797,0.0004178386,0.0074267797,0.0011719698,0.000802415,0.0014767156,0.0006245578,0.00068375154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036091713,0.00006299524,0.92137116,0.0003736538,0.000081328464,0.0005258637,0.022808902,0.00013506156,0.0007664634,0.002244124,0.019227875,0.032041673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016565167,0.000029586923,0.96529704,0.00012669156,0.000020838534,0.00010342197,0.007885996,0.00006769615,0.00008591351,0.00013123191,0.02621653,0.000018415914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031783435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05180179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23060602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016358634","doi":"10.3846/jbem.2020.12395","title":"TRANSATLANTIC AFFILIATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A QUARTER-CENTURY OF BIBLIOMETRIC EVIDENCE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej","keywords":"Scopus; Quarter (Canadian coin); Web of science; Regional science; Position (finance); Political science; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Institution; Identification (biology); Library science; Sociology; Geography; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.39793160264058597,"score_gpt":0.45934585479925183,"score_spread":0.06141425215866586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016358634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5175491,0.38475233,0.009177618,0.02014282,0.000985906,0.000065641245,0.0016492289,0.00007166445,0.06560569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90228397,0.091096506,0.0035814156,0.0007070384,0.00096619833,0.000029422048,0.00067764666,0.000029815345,0.00062794535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864623,0.005277604,0.0023384187,0.0018877605,0.003632575,0.00040142637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79290646,0.15594976,0.025971714,0.0089777475,0.014507333,0.0016869719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016900092,0.00036212563,0.00075582723,0.052104175,0.0015708162,0.011427375,0.00092079997,0.0016161859,0.0029781035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06565101,0.0003645065,0.000618416,0.084489584,0.005343431,0.014093988,0.004967371,0.0012839222,0.00040856216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018280259,0.00009174971,0.38377973,0.0065431735,0.0010900677,0.00042281608,0.021755159,0.0011095677,0.0008291232,0.06788865,0.0043996517,0.5119075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018839653,0.00012848465,0.72041625,0.015268423,0.0008290994,0.0017763743,0.057526253,0.0030179317,0.0016554329,0.045659725,0.15348867,0.00021457027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036945515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006045688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98309994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020177404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021486639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089377284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016661053","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03462-0","title":"Telescopic and panoramic views of library and information science research 2011–2018: a comparison of four weighting schemes for author co-citation analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Weighting; Information retrieval; Data science; Zoom; Citation analysis; Set (abstract data type); Citation impact; Co-citation; Rank (graph theory); World Wide Web; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.7748089364909767,"score_gpt":0.6271083223531914,"score_spread":0.14770061413778535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016661053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85548204,0.00853404,0.068072796,0.004193915,0.00061070675,0.00067769125,0.00985471,0.00039063708,0.052183613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95268697,0.0018010337,0.03963463,0.0001974056,0.00013203555,0.0002860063,0.003387586,0.00018462556,0.0016896112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888186,0.0039368602,0.0015888514,0.00086903444,0.0039944733,0.00079217425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615883,0.012528211,0.006915051,0.0033743782,0.0142544145,0.001339653],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017236685,0.0005435759,0.0008889545,0.021394162,0.001277809,0.005924829,0.0012099907,0.00090377696,0.0035118223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08453005,0.00041761503,0.0014404655,0.028068522,0.001066038,0.005228093,0.003821006,0.00092914235,0.00081165286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027005847,0.00019928985,0.39387003,0.0028463101,0.0026446406,0.0001589823,0.014740255,0.005708492,0.007866555,0.09092531,0.022325097,0.45601442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005528534,0.0005747532,0.8237025,0.0014505916,0.0037188036,0.00040594503,0.028647125,0.02679619,0.0049317167,0.046740502,0.0621422,0.0003368276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020236505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048439387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97860587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002994121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035000574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09115738},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3022460410","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00044","title":"How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Timeline; Openness to experience; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9412102896347241,"score_gpt":0.6538876646655836,"score_spread":0.2873226249691405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022460410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96326447,0.0037657097,0.0043929312,0.0030557567,0.00024678383,0.00014491839,0.0062075276,0.00009693381,0.018825056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935762,0.0011601982,0.0017720662,0.00021595495,0.00025509196,0.00021433915,0.0016776441,0.000032066313,0.0010964017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692975,0.018297194,0.004039188,0.0018413381,0.0057233777,0.00080144085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7612188,0.15489799,0.05469037,0.0121263815,0.012922877,0.0041435715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017414028,0.00024128846,0.0006676421,0.011640112,0.0013414928,0.0053677647,0.00057162455,0.0006005733,0.003154008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11951819,0.00022967154,0.00042716492,0.020940905,0.0016436981,0.0048470977,0.0041192886,0.0004632737,0.0005589326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064624293,0.00013211416,0.7556475,0.0039568385,0.00086864224,0.00043915716,0.06984172,0.00045716713,0.0037644617,0.008282621,0.007696361,0.14826724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028115053,0.00021771392,0.8664897,0.0011975461,0.0003270456,0.00060864567,0.059084836,0.0012909499,0.0032012882,0.0063974555,0.061052967,0.00010377259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008564313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018842948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98835987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010236093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092095315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023134157","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.01","title":"Do Tenure and Promotion Policies Discourage Publications in Predatory Journals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Institution; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Action (physics); Academic institution; Business; Management; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6761453625303655,"score_gpt":0.5539823309204654,"score_spread":0.12216303160990005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023134157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8034215,0.007938636,0.0044764793,0.10042775,0.0009023401,0.00041055438,0.0005532186,0.00033861597,0.08153091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289317,0.0020105466,0.0023848247,0.0071164966,0.0005306215,0.0001080871,0.00009323112,0.00005171269,0.004811271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659452,0.012224479,0.0027290264,0.0015780729,0.013121939,0.00440122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6027097,0.151504,0.14613427,0.020558333,0.0525567,0.026537035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042870574,0.00025540474,0.00073824916,0.0046771117,0.005252375,0.013287548,0.0024415406,0.0028675103,0.004886435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21244141,0.00042423262,0.00043626185,0.007979418,0.0078110793,0.006048706,0.003246468,0.001980579,0.0013108691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054879294,0.00069204805,0.68405336,0.0019540915,0.00019505047,0.00076848693,0.022728842,0.00055937684,0.0056378855,0.026161674,0.025717404,0.23098291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014782621,0.00047752034,0.829208,0.0010959018,0.00014511196,0.00046897182,0.021362836,0.00093128375,0.0055177687,0.01162979,0.12881255,0.0002025677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05048527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099960804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012824159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045743335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22672391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023509778","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.702","title":"Gender Gap in Natural Language Processing Research: Disparities in Authorship and Citations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Gender gap; Field (mathematics); Gender disparity; Gender bias; Psychology; Demography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.9217534349266007,"score_gpt":0.6847247130254399,"score_spread":0.23702872190116075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023509778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.940655,0.009943646,0.008150609,0.008181651,0.00036423927,0.00005156536,0.0071924278,0.00011270765,0.02534824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908743,0.0017316564,0.0023754593,0.00055760116,0.00023625263,0.000050553954,0.0021393872,0.000050387847,0.0019844093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921915,0.0020554878,0.001371564,0.0013468204,0.0025625548,0.00047213363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9033444,0.058510147,0.021313788,0.004759963,0.010230161,0.0018415976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012237984,0.00019562842,0.00041469943,0.011860149,0.0011042262,0.0028107278,0.00043923978,0.00045010485,0.006303806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07403794,0.00011607486,0.00037624707,0.01695238,0.001181861,0.0034961032,0.0019946168,0.0004726343,0.0012933926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016306035,0.000050941682,0.8247122,0.00083809294,0.00017883827,0.00037275525,0.015805094,0.00040076918,0.0019730951,0.02091908,0.0067978012,0.12778841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012476749,0.00008745938,0.92843986,0.0005079651,0.000075318385,0.0008189112,0.010914381,0.00076231326,0.0023865395,0.020165086,0.03578425,0.000045421213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038000832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076154275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98813987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091493054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016561387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064721406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023612994","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.02","title":"Nigerian Academics Patronizing Predatory Journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Publication; Mentorship; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Accreditation; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.7676862134537907,"score_gpt":0.5499434508952649,"score_spread":0.21774276255852587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023612994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98539364,0.0022312305,0.0003409008,0.0039994586,0.00015753091,0.000027684353,0.00002469404,0.000018493287,0.0078063263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311334,0.0021094077,0.0003074449,0.0011313237,0.00008148716,0.000011948522,0.000017017503,0.000009635782,0.003218411],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551,0.0015519806,0.0003588596,0.00035425197,0.001426359,0.00079857116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636148,0.010658641,0.01762031,0.0010487026,0.0031999825,0.0038575695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004806184,0.00029132783,0.0004717017,0.0020135131,0.0071125473,0.008603725,0.0008032634,0.0013674287,0.0037092878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023931919,0.00036646097,0.00017223095,0.0036910903,0.0034738618,0.0033560619,0.0028022446,0.0014583769,0.00075622415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022035798,0.00025687192,0.30575392,0.0007799148,0.000045517132,0.014666056,0.55875504,0.00014608537,0.0042222817,0.009470996,0.010009722,0.09567325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012736824,0.00021527428,0.11403076,0.0005672879,0.000043521755,0.007159465,0.8017148,0.00022688325,0.0012541405,0.0026982073,0.07199376,0.000083177474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033558256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061660428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99863255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00239669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044144955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025417864},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3023725873","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00926","title":"The Impact of Open Access Mandates on Invention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Inefficiency; Publishing; Open science; Impact factor; Political science; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.7860488446868067,"score_gpt":0.6651684844503467,"score_spread":0.12088036023645998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023725873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90425897,0.009517394,0.0046988092,0.01581773,0.00018930006,0.00007222461,0.001408389,0.00008713214,0.06395001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979412,0.00046788348,0.00018337692,0.0003390001,0.00010447824,0.00002060224,0.00008765673,0.0000108196455,0.00084504834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.981754,0.008528319,0.0016234487,0.0018142253,0.0043807123,0.0018991879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5598333,0.3140317,0.089799225,0.012669476,0.016935922,0.0067304005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019698504,0.000250073,0.000865343,0.003030009,0.0013269837,0.006799448,0.0011613861,0.0022515333,0.009732441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15566117,0.0003288456,0.0010839119,0.0040137745,0.0037513594,0.0051889447,0.0035698912,0.00321379,0.00075605704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019996637,0.0010945325,0.5851512,0.0016200667,0.0015564949,0.0010224138,0.0025197067,0.020138485,0.0035212764,0.29438117,0.00830517,0.07868982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021480327,0.00078131474,0.8022481,0.0007912407,0.001400706,0.0003919377,0.0036833824,0.013151917,0.007552359,0.13217515,0.037419617,0.00018937168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062076724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043610153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002542019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10417688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023730740","doi":"10.1002/bes2.1705","title":"Effects of Inferred Gender on Patterns of Co‐Authorship in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Canadian Celiac Association; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Productivity; Speculation; Ecology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Biology; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3411962373557194,"score_gpt":0.47136715724028194,"score_spread":0.13017091988456253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023730740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99470526,0.0005909847,0.0007451116,0.00029132693,0.000053098007,0.000014825126,0.0011805614,0.000013797388,0.0024050341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899095,0.00006205969,0.0002102191,0.000017893895,0.000021370774,0.000009882767,0.00021766551,0.000005195282,0.00046476728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931143,0.0028417537,0.0008610085,0.0011871479,0.0013863979,0.0006093345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85595185,0.08611862,0.03984121,0.005853877,0.007132272,0.005102097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007698623,0.00020367772,0.00033061637,0.0033538837,0.0006738581,0.0019128225,0.0006421819,0.00045940225,0.0069579287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079392046,0.00016942917,0.0003834182,0.0040649823,0.0007595059,0.0013664027,0.0014839444,0.00047854672,0.0008822893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018683649,0.000023479297,0.99304813,0.000036529334,0.000085035936,0.00005412605,0.00076106447,0.000096066186,0.00040560562,0.00019479272,0.00026728632,0.0048410725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061201977,0.000051391835,0.9964489,0.000028270808,0.000024771749,0.000117552634,0.0013152866,0.0004170362,0.0003521288,0.0004650902,0.0007650212,0.0000084697085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019795613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031470682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046893448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052968087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04071468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023976011","doi":"10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1","title":"Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Data science","score_opus":0.7227239243436286,"score_gpt":0.6456942526559293,"score_spread":0.07702967168769936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023976011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02150578,0.8826103,0.009073427,0.008383149,0.0020555942,0.061974656,0.010249418,0.00040290414,0.003744763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15346755,0.62889284,0.08864922,0.0059091235,0.000989902,0.11331145,0.0074660215,0.00015177773,0.0011621747],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.7967568,0.08124107,0.084044546,0.0048476565,0.031520635,0.0015892577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42464694,0.3193749,0.1626182,0.011036983,0.077955976,0.0043670787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14297044,0.0024710137,0.008799169,0.056148466,0.0027532356,0.005433935,0.0046868958,0.0031154214,0.005036066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42992195,0.0024707702,0.008945666,0.04103506,0.0033804611,0.0122219175,0.006057918,0.0022803566,0.001013432],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021641755,0.00004147793,0.0054627215,0.92387146,0.0030309088,0.00012563833,0.0015496098,0.00012932056,0.0002246034,0.00039158194,0.0063835396,0.05857273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069964665,0.00035092814,0.01390642,0.94543517,0.0105447415,0.0003734546,0.0023439843,0.00026737465,0.00032074252,0.00084864587,0.02473167,0.00017730457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065035853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022159511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010195178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049823888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.756109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024680966","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.002","title":"Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of ten major dermatology journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Burns","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Citation analysis; Rank correlation; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Bibliometrics; CLARITY; Demography; Dermatology; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5639094148789731,"score_gpt":0.5569155777803343,"score_spread":0.006993837098638767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024680966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902468,0.0044852966,0.0005571447,0.00029073504,0.000049323226,0.000077335695,0.001419027,0.000049769795,0.002824498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620503,0.001520268,0.0006878498,0.00003567354,0.00008953748,0.000038385657,0.0011072347,0.00001607471,0.00029992973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909072,0.0025138515,0.0022155356,0.00058856764,0.0033912489,0.00038352114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8780529,0.07249015,0.021618294,0.0026907749,0.022374965,0.0027728195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008914674,0.0004158189,0.0013468779,0.039676905,0.0011963198,0.004155271,0.00070118305,0.000635996,0.0031901516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08720745,0.00015804346,0.0018401537,0.055490177,0.0006343884,0.0017931303,0.0014039683,0.0003318881,0.0006502675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019270525,0.00036086366,0.87884456,0.0018106169,0.0020544035,0.00031049203,0.0015807572,0.0006380012,0.002749392,0.00043155183,0.0014258954,0.107866496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083070365,0.00052627764,0.99051625,0.00016278603,0.0011980229,0.00047612016,0.0022312633,0.0011128671,0.0010965748,0.00049066497,0.002071485,0.00003468824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027832533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033321388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99108535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016190453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003448363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047145903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025043114","doi":"10.1101/2020.05.12.092247","title":"Working groups, gender and publication impact of Canada’s ecology and evolution faculty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Population; Gender equity; Affirmative action; Political science; Ecology; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Demography; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.28348804422595586,"score_gpt":0.42248471675883487,"score_spread":0.138996672532879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025043114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255253,0.007112437,0.00030713508,0.0073006586,0.00031056174,0.00007147539,0.009718286,0.00006569017,0.049588315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162734,0.0013822087,0.00019940313,0.00024407626,0.00008373735,0.000023085227,0.0011895346,0.000028110546,0.0052225017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821276,0.0013470544,0.000490823,0.0007231155,0.0072378376,0.001988425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.929379,0.01802312,0.011857261,0.0029924407,0.024333082,0.013415128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011184986,0.00028568401,0.0007061949,0.010888355,0.005070632,0.0060537905,0.001674043,0.0005483253,0.0093425745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052089773,0.00019553631,0.00047158683,0.019570122,0.0017800676,0.0016052764,0.0027542543,0.0006805926,0.0006638931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042296975,0.00012534922,0.8401597,0.0005592334,0.00031655052,0.00033785452,0.025290484,0.00044261708,0.0008458172,0.0057963743,0.020236457,0.10546659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024962283,0.000059599046,0.9585537,0.00029459991,0.000097169315,0.00007124901,0.011483105,0.00031977665,0.0004929933,0.0007762625,0.02778899,0.000037679594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8383267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8707313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98911166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022504793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048939172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3252508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026288581","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.23847.2","title":"Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.902308791672649,"score_gpt":0.6945844730890101,"score_spread":0.20772431858363893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026288581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.877211,0.017714329,0.0019678895,0.0040838937,0.00044984135,0.001032955,0.07658309,0.00063000055,0.020327007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269051,0.0076732174,0.0056216624,0.00050852407,0.0005611665,0.0011694342,0.052144177,0.00037134442,0.0050453227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726288,0.004031904,0.0066754776,0.0015876734,0.013403804,0.0016724381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7342666,0.072426304,0.10048438,0.0072442694,0.072409764,0.013168753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023771524,0.0007330292,0.0014096408,0.051963545,0.0015428982,0.0077224537,0.0013859775,0.00077150716,0.005866679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14371328,0.00034624024,0.001691854,0.07843257,0.0012575394,0.0045051323,0.0045176796,0.00091963995,0.0021617326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012559317,0.00017222148,0.84419096,0.0062998915,0.0012286857,0.00068219716,0.0032930418,0.00066407747,0.00076109666,0.0023705964,0.042324442,0.09675694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007627927,0.0003050679,0.9550437,0.0017232385,0.0007230173,0.0006071671,0.0038915696,0.0011888117,0.000887243,0.0012036858,0.034256198,0.00009387155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008673058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009332549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034552768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008041263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12571734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030270071","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2014.01.029","title":"A bibliometric analysis of Medical Papers published by Huai'an First People's Hospital during 2002-2011","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zhonghua yixue keyan guanli zazhi","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Quarter (Canadian coin); Library science; Medicine; Psychology; History; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.12147194910418564,"score_gpt":0.4450959523448008,"score_spread":0.3236240032406152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030270071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81197333,0.02980771,0.0014183533,0.0013552854,0.0002733807,0.0008782651,0.13390511,0.00040452782,0.019984094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423542,0.010549628,0.0018125371,0.00015547256,0.00036009,0.0007946102,0.039941836,0.00003987112,0.0039918325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244905,0.0007526806,0.0021402393,0.00071065145,0.0034621258,0.00048538673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814605,0.0040088915,0.0077634132,0.0005543207,0.005432776,0.00078009104],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040932875,0.0005988993,0.0011097736,0.11194098,0.001443371,0.0027710432,0.00064978056,0.00041587994,0.0048178965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016165692,0.00025585294,0.0012688411,0.14305715,0.0005103559,0.0013300456,0.001327368,0.0002682265,0.001080733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003576626,0.00010688606,0.8597938,0.0069480226,0.00087708904,0.0005807333,0.0016855517,0.00071976933,0.0008283247,0.00082218274,0.022072554,0.10520753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015202441,0.00006267076,0.9850832,0.0003195525,0.00040167532,0.00036048185,0.0013805851,0.00053439336,0.00055190874,0.00015350555,0.011104306,0.00003246285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02004701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01760415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005241541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067359833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039860666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032390629","doi":"10.1111/jonm.13038","title":"Trends in high‐impact papers in nursing research published from 2008 to 2018: A web of science‐based bibliometric analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Nursing research; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Impact factor; Web of science; Citation analysis; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; MEDLINE; Nursing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5132470776187895,"score_gpt":0.6032668532435289,"score_spread":0.0900197756247394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032390629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7364426,0.10302351,0.0019805871,0.0030311404,0.00060319755,0.0005761435,0.13505338,0.0008252494,0.01846413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86376524,0.05162712,0.005820556,0.00039406016,0.0009065213,0.0012981831,0.07092928,0.00018726384,0.005071737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.980627,0.0018861227,0.0057092286,0.0017221447,0.009407053,0.0006483887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91978437,0.02666738,0.028242111,0.0016176504,0.0214923,0.0021962812],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009888876,0.0006580568,0.0019883285,0.12641752,0.0011231449,0.0066201612,0.0011829699,0.0010365527,0.0036732906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06191372,0.00025418596,0.001975792,0.15795018,0.0006471928,0.0040227,0.0025455095,0.0006407678,0.0017188019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056571513,0.00017735075,0.771182,0.019410206,0.002124635,0.0011113472,0.0037735768,0.0015936639,0.0013886299,0.0020936176,0.025213148,0.17136611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003964325,0.00011327364,0.94089776,0.0024843048,0.0009862196,0.0014922492,0.003096536,0.0016217232,0.0008995707,0.0010355319,0.04725398,0.00007921935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005130374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006254591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029347201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034414402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05229801},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3032439792","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00069","title":"Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Demography; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Subject (documents); Citation impact; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8348130930551083,"score_gpt":0.6305721392040463,"score_spread":0.204240953851062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032439792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882415,0.0041589215,0.0002736103,0.0013513436,0.000055793265,0.0000065365653,0.00050771504,0.00001023098,0.0053943414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983948,0.00047648893,0.00012946037,0.00009571946,0.000036206176,0.0000026701584,0.00013457461,0.000005032915,0.0007252024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998448,0.00037477215,0.00013547574,0.00036832673,0.0003635178,0.00030990512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855195,0.004914482,0.0058731493,0.0011542009,0.0010819737,0.0014566525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024565393,0.00016909976,0.0004892796,0.0028130542,0.0005631472,0.0011273866,0.00034005553,0.00045947012,0.0048315465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022195619,0.0001197395,0.00074563484,0.003396622,0.00063190254,0.0012289919,0.0010974371,0.00041850776,0.00037010826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012786554,0.000027360895,0.9747967,0.00012348569,0.00018961496,0.00010942793,0.0009301232,0.00012794606,0.0004766688,0.0011427691,0.0005791946,0.02136892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057524503,0.000047793685,0.9960872,0.000045799006,0.00006908852,0.00008635142,0.00069740706,0.00007918469,0.00021881014,0.00064634153,0.0020119734,0.0000043926993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009853894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022408174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99754345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064138306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014556804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01959306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034475429","doi":"","title":"Mathematics ≠ Science: A study in citation rates over time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.22701131767768357,"score_gpt":0.4646095983762427,"score_spread":0.23759828069855915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034475429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91748345,0.0080255475,0.00064939546,0.008751744,0.0004887165,0.000050554616,0.03583986,0.00010303055,0.028607717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796047,0.0019984276,0.0003419335,0.00028769783,0.00044119993,0.00003514285,0.006087654,0.00006780748,0.011135533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975406,0.0003608197,0.00026669863,0.00029911473,0.0012779213,0.0002549365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95303595,0.014803489,0.012432859,0.002069917,0.014238867,0.0034189057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004049277,0.00023860426,0.0005518729,0.011593192,0.0009601146,0.0038893486,0.00080646394,0.0011573072,0.013977868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047440134,0.00014597068,0.0007011393,0.029132806,0.0006944117,0.0023109908,0.00090886984,0.0011231198,0.002547349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033545773,0.000099371566,0.93113035,0.00025819085,0.0003986183,0.000105842235,0.0021078503,0.00030503693,0.00031573983,0.0025852015,0.013306748,0.049051568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009822704,0.000053859232,0.98866093,0.000054454573,0.000058587048,0.000086285094,0.00073980284,0.00026542647,0.00012077578,0.00029522658,0.009637234,0.000017675744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33965442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35872364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038542817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055629727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67535484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037031294","doi":"10.22541/au.159335823.30845711","title":"Concerns That 10,000 Faculty Nationally and Internationally Have About Research Impact: Isn’t It All Academic Research Impact (ARI) If It Comes From The Academy?      ","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Scholarship; Alliance; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.9039217106237523,"score_gpt":0.7146205931596261,"score_spread":0.18930111746412615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037031294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014071135,0.02967479,0.0014819046,0.92741126,0.006516396,0.000033487788,0.00028719023,0.0002375504,0.020286307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3988659,0.0691896,0.003939092,0.49190134,0.018888876,0.00026214935,0.0010332889,0.0006131529,0.015306518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90408075,0.03060768,0.004884261,0.006619513,0.04864585,0.005161987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68262017,0.15599816,0.04097457,0.015911808,0.053964917,0.050530393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07570529,0.00072320533,0.0012182826,0.0041697277,0.012355299,0.02158062,0.003366,0.015036696,0.024974309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23683761,0.00082631747,0.0014423823,0.008103068,0.015188649,0.026274318,0.01229067,0.015307727,0.0071715056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003750132,0.00018431152,0.044382367,0.0019363195,0.00019410664,0.00054494676,0.01233721,0.00038026297,0.00074547075,0.024685549,0.512741,0.40149337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007933977,0.0004224668,0.048252612,0.0036528222,0.00013521375,0.0018467001,0.0653298,0.0006797726,0.0008703674,0.054155875,0.82420266,0.00037226517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011176988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012597198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012049566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012782941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40037262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037107203","doi":"10.1177/0959354320930826","title":"Open peer commentaries in <i>Theory &amp; Psychology</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Focus (optics); Key (lock); Psychology; Discursive psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Discourse analysis; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7518767381190462,"score_gpt":0.6737853698578182,"score_spread":0.07809136826122798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037107203","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010277496,0.0011301549,0.00891764,0.4588468,0.49950927,0.0010708983,0.0010177599,0.0014228091,0.02705686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031756263,0.0040934677,0.02408983,0.33403528,0.44816327,0.0058327406,0.0025949078,0.008671638,0.14076269],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8308189,0.07767528,0.020158796,0.007367114,0.058751825,0.005228091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14769696,0.5595783,0.032383326,0.03802509,0.2066842,0.01563215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17365864,0.0020696092,0.0025713744,0.0070872684,0.01416412,0.023820266,0.006277254,0.018853974,0.0870104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69746405,0.0013951223,0.0025107122,0.007758249,0.015410902,0.017281218,0.0134148,0.03003834,0.04875234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031680276,0.000015080778,0.000090823494,0.00032991054,0.000009767378,0.000079466896,0.0014783225,0.000027045038,0.00030476405,0.0047594025,0.9877922,0.00508163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031618278,0.00004110929,0.0003627255,0.0010541095,0.000013155984,0.00006974278,0.0025932859,0.00033833922,0.00048580498,0.008760603,0.98616,0.00008970647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018488237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020080302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009766715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017312989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91840565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037370937","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v15i1.5870","title":"La Fédération des milieux documentaires (FMD) : une fédération d’associations et d’institutions.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.5395703661191669,"score_gpt":0.5521733356276226,"score_spread":0.012602969508455741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037370937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08380122,0.08664941,0.020764705,0.13796294,0.005186608,0.00073962583,0.00648953,0.0010349532,0.6573709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58656824,0.025087234,0.03419062,0.006275973,0.0010044937,0.00051015,0.0049168444,0.00029764874,0.34114882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898281,0.002223558,0.0005640203,0.0008918461,0.0048962785,0.0015962464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424757,0.0017670969,0.0016241934,0.0015568342,0.005997753,0.004806547],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009864284,0.00037352456,0.000413962,0.0052724136,0.010869099,0.014631514,0.001452584,0.0021270774,0.011191447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013834864,0.00040806294,0.0004925921,0.009054635,0.006658263,0.00468654,0.005790082,0.0021894595,0.0019113355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080924525,0.000062124665,0.021578906,0.00064190157,0.0000382186,0.00041520162,0.017978655,0.00039271693,0.00086893764,0.3767571,0.24820039,0.3329849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005651154,0.000011927277,0.021443693,0.0003585213,0.000009657024,0.00013809737,0.0043674335,0.00013773014,0.00014482517,0.004767882,0.96858996,0.000024593373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7455772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038550194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10237379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53273904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037396094","doi":"10.1017/9781108783521","title":"Reading Peer Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Science and Technology Facilities Council; KU Leuven; Yale University; University of Stirling; Curtin University of Technology; Leverhulme Trust; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Monash University; University of Sussex; Birkbeck, University of London; University of Southampton; Queen Mary University of London; Royal Society; University of Bedfordshire; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; University of Cambridge; University of the Arts London; King's College London; Simon Fraser University; University of Chicago; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National Institutes of Health; Canterbury Christ Church University; Coventry University","keywords":"Reading (process); Element (criminal law); Political radicalism; Politics; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4952485308698015,"score_gpt":0.46546838736760804,"score_spread":0.029780143502193435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037396094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045502087,0.027539011,0.014299398,0.029420368,0.038482677,0.00036816325,0.0007267057,0.0015984278,0.8871103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0083979,0.023573216,0.010120351,0.0061832797,0.017908838,0.0003761386,0.00094518403,0.0009216526,0.9315734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98038703,0.0036091397,0.0011900851,0.0018381632,0.012414592,0.0005609239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587249,0.012693738,0.0020179101,0.007684206,0.016660368,0.0022189687],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00819981,0.001283427,0.0016059751,0.0049321405,0.0038332117,0.018232934,0.0022904691,0.004822329,0.14150998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053042557,0.00069990824,0.0006782577,0.005227572,0.005607183,0.011305068,0.0053647053,0.0045271893,0.18218581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007355332,0.000013095825,0.000054344346,0.00038917168,0.0000064876913,0.00007221613,0.0004970833,0.00009132483,0.00022520596,0.08014738,0.7890252,0.12947121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014143817,0.0000047245126,0.000047170186,0.00016337758,9.151533e-7,0.000049210645,0.000079455625,0.000017125965,0.00004123523,0.008392972,0.9911981,0.00000432573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010371736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019550482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99506783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029271452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010706801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47339803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038893329","doi":"","title":"Rapport d'expertise de projets soumis à la Fondation Canadienne pour l’Innovation","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2044615997515577,"score_gpt":0.402441819651307,"score_spread":0.1979802198997493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038893329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8483255,0.003703395,0.04144252,0.0049005738,0.00092789065,0.0003240745,0.0025610868,0.0009917762,0.09682327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95642895,0.0010231663,0.020154586,0.00022694968,0.0002960236,0.00032321952,0.0014689036,0.00017985552,0.01989838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97636276,0.007915233,0.0010350727,0.0023445666,0.010535594,0.0018067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9038587,0.068742365,0.0040882975,0.0039028223,0.014723949,0.004683818],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014570394,0.0014078338,0.0013026679,0.013844926,0.0033563103,0.010866766,0.0014516169,0.004146966,0.0173071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083387494,0.0005618575,0.0023584072,0.008254413,0.0016922461,0.0074209967,0.0042871595,0.003420535,0.0035381184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058256346,0.0021252662,0.1537202,0.0038927856,0.0025813563,0.012103456,0.05914749,0.034179065,0.030717243,0.115675285,0.038328376,0.54170394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00130416,0.0029670785,0.400208,0.0023161264,0.0017359795,0.0116137955,0.060173243,0.16806181,0.061458606,0.07570973,0.21348092,0.00097057066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022217343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013257871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99482304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005176947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054036677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07705659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038981544","doi":"10.7554/elife.60438","title":"Ways to increase equity, diversity and inclusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Racism; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7864795108863052,"score_gpt":0.5846512036689153,"score_spread":0.20182830721738987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038981544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026546163,0.010866434,0.035815123,0.6773606,0.0071436623,0.00044522624,0.00029368236,0.0006793445,0.24084982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61924887,0.010828701,0.07713836,0.19881158,0.008306023,0.002273556,0.000617328,0.0007347487,0.082040876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9387163,0.032375764,0.0017331828,0.0032650016,0.017202392,0.006707397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9217421,0.032921255,0.0051584565,0.009251818,0.013291483,0.017634947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061442934,0.00094951416,0.0013440282,0.007860685,0.009385556,0.021315683,0.0037394806,0.007995915,0.026481248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111120485,0.00069342135,0.0012717611,0.0054165325,0.016057314,0.032513686,0.049835276,0.008935699,0.00471029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102349164,0.00033873142,0.0054988014,0.0008150067,0.0001347932,0.00015543554,0.025961908,0.00027820191,0.0007245533,0.44234163,0.13945226,0.3841963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095551186,0.000106088286,0.005003417,0.0021392554,0.000060268954,0.0001622732,0.014511928,0.0002589831,0.0007505644,0.4424595,0.53439206,0.00006004641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005443254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009992896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069124545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029394563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32494515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039713805","doi":"10.1101/2020.07.01.181669","title":"Task specialization across research careers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universidade da Coruña; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; European Commission","keywords":"Archetype; Task (project management); Diversity (politics); Psychology; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.47951111242403965,"score_gpt":0.5153232605362955,"score_spread":0.03581214811225586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039713805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677193,0.0014966216,0.012190358,0.0006972796,0.000060439404,0.00007519302,0.0045813723,0.00027395014,0.012905457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887298,0.00049951155,0.0030819697,0.00007169156,0.000051398132,0.000062923944,0.004823999,0.000068151945,0.0026106434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954091,0.001300347,0.00034068167,0.0013129603,0.0009044784,0.0007324518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650903,0.017764611,0.005832565,0.003551506,0.004149857,0.0036111998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007432449,0.00055742136,0.0006987892,0.004968924,0.0010021758,0.0032686158,0.0007489663,0.0008634988,0.007531343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03878548,0.0003492338,0.00082473794,0.0048776483,0.0006393361,0.0019837788,0.0028607328,0.00097076886,0.0032811223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016830404,0.0003045277,0.84909934,0.0006875146,0.0003118998,0.00033060677,0.0024788699,0.016895862,0.0044809976,0.004726474,0.007533715,0.11146711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009387218,0.00025090156,0.89000416,0.00028482734,0.00014809787,0.00060761743,0.002042371,0.0641928,0.0023699242,0.026785668,0.013139992,0.000079769095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038554987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040102326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99503106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010843369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014195605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042696781","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10911","title":"Leveraging Tweets, Citations, and Social Networks to Improve Bibliometrics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"JAMA Network Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Altmetrics; Social network analysis; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5134223927168502,"score_gpt":0.5263683747941194,"score_spread":0.012945982077269158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042696781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043610903,0.0014437465,0.0017347623,0.97447556,0.0063343416,0.00002900045,0.00053323817,0.0001563979,0.010931867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24171218,0.0065645883,0.019125914,0.56554633,0.13221473,0.00041928786,0.001065517,0.00033868905,0.033012725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98558027,0.0061232164,0.0011516156,0.00074161444,0.005815791,0.00058742415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79432106,0.16508463,0.0074446364,0.005293388,0.023197802,0.0046584033],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020501249,0.00041289668,0.00094381435,0.0065179644,0.002427511,0.007719721,0.0014712674,0.011079578,0.004663604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18487096,0.00034611483,0.0006832383,0.006092094,0.0025567,0.007962251,0.0027937721,0.008202832,0.005135356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002149824,0.000126207,0.015308229,0.00024236005,0.0001301395,0.00034928732,0.00047385955,0.0004500152,0.0006475644,0.022853326,0.77182066,0.18738337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024009665,0.000109816225,0.018224271,0.00078650104,0.00020638612,0.0004745095,0.00239317,0.01692466,0.0029192495,0.23348989,0.7240401,0.00019142173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005337962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018862767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99348205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037219736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036529587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10842222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043477317","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.003","title":"Editorial – Revisiting Open Access Publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6657408547549513,"score_gpt":0.5783386524786365,"score_spread":0.08740220227631479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043477317","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010124093,0.0020623715,0.00013285615,0.043108203,0.95345,0.000014008931,0.00004091533,0.00006212429,0.0010282401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011064523,0.0020156598,0.00019604305,0.031116124,0.96109456,0.00002538768,0.000031851032,0.000069368965,0.0043445835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97779536,0.0029259508,0.0038761587,0.0022057905,0.011435357,0.0017613621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88261765,0.05168399,0.008524351,0.0063754823,0.040788554,0.010010059],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021552447,0.0023418386,0.0036039657,0.008735259,0.006015285,0.016693749,0.005711835,0.023839988,0.020250225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1063331,0.0014180987,0.0037074713,0.0049194214,0.0076468466,0.0068037417,0.0037982517,0.022094412,0.010969005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066225926,0.000040253763,0.000088023065,0.00045548833,0.000059491435,0.00022572812,0.000055190223,0.000039863524,0.0001476684,0.0011225013,0.98772496,0.009974531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666837,0.00004092695,0.00047466904,0.00074629224,0.0000990719,0.00026454168,0.00012854378,0.00018340332,0.0002490095,0.0031056937,0.9946091,0.000032103013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021688514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004757021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99428815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049000247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006609395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113981605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044702960","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.013","title":"Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: a citation analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Publishing; Citation analysis; Medicine; Guideline; Bibliometrics; Citation impact; Web of science; MEDLINE; Library science; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Political science; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9883880526495334,"score_gpt":0.8212683432552055,"score_spread":0.16711970939432796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044702960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97472125,0.007550285,0.003913672,0.002938527,0.0002828125,0.00024160102,0.0036314004,0.00014056062,0.006579951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674654,0.00041649138,0.0011441809,0.00020701652,0.00014487602,0.00006304388,0.00087570044,0.0000702856,0.0003318881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8880998,0.041957583,0.03389095,0.007739807,0.024371643,0.0039402344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30605075,0.5180944,0.095105946,0.019206708,0.05578787,0.005754274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07732522,0.0007160839,0.001996806,0.01871403,0.0016843219,0.008036251,0.0018380597,0.0022773088,0.0037473408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48000535,0.00054535695,0.0042616064,0.033044208,0.0015918685,0.0039399145,0.0029973714,0.0021058444,0.00073171844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041417356,0.000072554765,0.9795592,0.00033327704,0.002235765,0.00006708754,0.0011133316,0.00017330698,0.00023944592,0.00035109426,0.0009146909,0.014526053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039807943,0.00017470251,0.9903357,0.00026908712,0.0024108281,0.0003110073,0.001475675,0.001357831,0.00051460334,0.0010741684,0.0019790463,0.000057547302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007617968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0085109845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026086634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054962058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40893972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045325153","doi":"10.1016/j.physa.2020.124959","title":"Scholar’s career switch adhesive with research topics: An evidence from China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Construct (python library); Similarity (geometry); Mechanism (biology); Bibliographic coupling; China; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Layer (electronics); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Political science; Mathematics; Nanotechnology","score_opus":0.6338376285454396,"score_gpt":0.5638238323392688,"score_spread":0.07001379620617076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045325153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943756,0.00054170686,0.0000971299,0.0008752878,0.000018299892,0.000008887239,0.0003031576,0.000007202943,0.0037727621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972011,0.00024432648,0.00002946877,0.00009594487,0.000025110005,0.000004537151,0.00025045252,0.000003034501,0.0021460056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826777,0.00023091964,0.00012962871,0.00027636436,0.00047816004,0.0006172156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941606,0.0023488086,0.0033465298,0.0003917368,0.001453893,0.0030428919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018743603,0.00019082736,0.0005382464,0.0050665033,0.0023043775,0.0023267781,0.0010209982,0.000668457,0.008203223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005913647,0.0002043048,0.00054953806,0.007903795,0.0012160821,0.0011872952,0.0020892413,0.0008928516,0.0006050138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015460735,0.000100879304,0.97971797,0.000049832026,0.000107793836,0.00035802257,0.0026963602,0.00014718332,0.0002179945,0.0026101028,0.0019266627,0.011912566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018554792,0.00006005341,0.9907426,0.000023619139,0.00008831135,0.00008476201,0.004263498,0.00051991455,0.00013292224,0.0008104254,0.003242102,0.000013273304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05661649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07839174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019087674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11257386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045465353","doi":"10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x","title":"Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Library and Archives Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Criticism; Psychology; Peer review; Distress; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.9673817885818834,"score_gpt":0.7461647558699385,"score_spread":0.22121703271194493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045465353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68566215,0.018853223,0.2005017,0.020506544,0.0022971227,0.010095395,0.0021573256,0.00048282783,0.059443735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472969,0.0013847837,0.044953287,0.0009988997,0.0011650233,0.002791175,0.00044427323,0.00007210579,0.0008935363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.14318544,0.57970035,0.087385654,0.015773749,0.17078115,0.0031737383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.029374313,0.7402896,0.13119875,0.026897034,0.0695347,0.0027056038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.513355,0.000888794,0.002081531,0.028602593,0.0055341837,0.008806829,0.0035736593,0.002901731,0.0022544072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.85545456,0.00078413717,0.001569292,0.02259533,0.012265485,0.008498468,0.012254508,0.0026181978,0.00067296764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010095512,0.00040482802,0.606874,0.012102755,0.0017093504,0.0004911562,0.06787895,0.002894423,0.0023140747,0.018289445,0.009199115,0.27683234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002988382,0.0021833435,0.72228706,0.011532254,0.001247274,0.0034178668,0.03968208,0.021193642,0.008249161,0.11071396,0.07842527,0.000769261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017572793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018506558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008176773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014671215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60011995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046526245","doi":"10.17613/h7y0z-s3q32","title":"Developing a persistent identifier roadmap for open access to UK research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jisc Repository (Jisc)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Austrian Science Fund; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Japan Science and Technology Agency; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Glasgow; University of Oxford; University of St Andrews; University of Southampton; National Institute for Health and Care Research; CERN; Wellcome Trust; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; UK Research and Innovation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identifier; Work (physics); Service (business); Public relations; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.8897607284027292,"score_gpt":0.7040016995030572,"score_spread":0.185759028899672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046526245","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02319997,0.007088652,0.51740634,0.16768298,0.009058914,0.009391337,0.014508122,0.014409816,0.2372538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061376657,0.006723177,0.8667875,0.0040891436,0.0009921332,0.007598114,0.016221944,0.0017659591,0.03444539],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92841476,0.030543579,0.011812358,0.0044404683,0.02050238,0.004286529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7850322,0.065208904,0.016484609,0.02751683,0.09090509,0.01485243],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08537542,0.0010698034,0.001470247,0.033476923,0.0078735845,0.03149765,0.004867542,0.0062091164,0.039072134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21246225,0.0016907331,0.0020037862,0.033579003,0.0048417756,0.04041179,0.029896162,0.0062427497,0.023542225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017412742,0.00020687237,0.0065868325,0.0035649205,0.000059169706,0.00053015316,0.008093654,0.0021431423,0.0010632478,0.3438919,0.2051612,0.4285249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046999074,0.00017097386,0.003412571,0.0028222208,0.000055491524,0.00025725766,0.0064317733,0.0034887001,0.0011440648,0.059725124,0.9222981,0.00014684319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013572673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017629666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99513245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048692822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45151377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048164327","doi":"10.36834/cmej.70700","title":"Peer review: My article was rejected by the journal I edit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Peer review; Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19927227095285546,"score_gpt":0.53003668778467,"score_spread":0.33076441683181446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048164327","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011592686,0.00085145934,0.0001461708,0.05582917,0.94039863,0.000041815416,0.000059291073,0.000089803994,0.0024677054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028468121,0.0021131313,0.0005175489,0.037907485,0.89120466,0.000078165554,0.00013076828,0.00025015816,0.064951375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794931,0.0023439038,0.0015434773,0.0016280694,0.013804781,0.0011866449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8179494,0.018047325,0.004976927,0.0040339837,0.13694677,0.018045532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015236646,0.0020204547,0.0031274178,0.0055112704,0.006190015,0.012831018,0.003562184,0.014618094,0.033277024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124098,0.0007899352,0.002213161,0.001854749,0.0030531555,0.0028100745,0.001993462,0.011427467,0.028320089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002715543,0.0000094728675,0.00004669058,0.000062460975,0.00001181843,0.00013318693,0.00001915266,0.000009006804,0.00008316451,0.00019751427,0.9961676,0.0032327531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005766691,0.000030576437,0.00046909545,0.00026599586,0.000040781633,0.00034400873,0.00012425442,0.00019227822,0.000263834,0.0010336273,0.9971432,0.00003467247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004773473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014327552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054272367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011388826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11132276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049588163","doi":"10.1177/0961000620948573","title":"On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Information science; Library science; Documentation science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.21682604463760077,"score_gpt":0.44240869001076066,"score_spread":0.2255826453731599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049588163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942168,0.0012465889,0.00008492631,0.00041883017,0.000016734739,0.000013760187,0.00040579142,0.000008521971,0.0035880946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973895,0.0006783155,0.000071661896,0.0000492517,0.000021571144,0.00001198804,0.0003528649,0.0000038528606,0.0014210824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787354,0.00030156595,0.00023369932,0.00038444652,0.0007236437,0.00048310938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151963,0.0014793469,0.0021240297,0.0003031715,0.0022327886,0.0023410986],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034799848,0.00025563862,0.0004825994,0.007520572,0.0014052745,0.0019979968,0.00057094474,0.00044591626,0.0028575503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068790233,0.00020243166,0.000498639,0.013127175,0.00085427356,0.0013091406,0.0017303885,0.0004169084,0.00039780975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011164091,0.000067282606,0.9434035,0.00020316271,0.00007041031,0.00027300726,0.0073188534,0.00042071487,0.001438888,0.0013944292,0.0011053231,0.044192903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030713225,0.000021560203,0.99569774,0.00001511654,0.0000128920365,0.000035374225,0.0019774127,0.00023621296,0.00013439411,0.00008793631,0.0017714343,0.0000068657014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04112713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059992827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99247944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003397828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070129945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081775546},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3081549561","doi":"10.17269/s41997-020-00411-5","title":"Money down the drain: predatory publishing in the COVID-19 era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Publishing; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economics; Political science; Business; Medicine; Virology; Law; Internal medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7656915835821335,"score_gpt":0.5525639252327351,"score_spread":0.2131276583493984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081549561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046023216,0.038076352,0.0007396193,0.7664349,0.005945267,0.000038424627,0.0009042111,0.00014339958,0.14169458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74932563,0.05169691,0.0014769856,0.13468303,0.016435556,0.00009191274,0.00082375086,0.0005268115,0.044939462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786194,0.0057861097,0.0012608928,0.0012100156,0.010679584,0.0024440296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86708903,0.06525298,0.015792722,0.0062882886,0.024741745,0.020835174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016310226,0.0003967828,0.0013640026,0.0117331715,0.009473159,0.036428306,0.0018683502,0.007871339,0.027086325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12644796,0.00042452186,0.0005431522,0.019238474,0.018260371,0.024141708,0.008803778,0.0068802414,0.0044061686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032043902,0.00010615977,0.023332333,0.00092964445,0.00010792908,0.0016689057,0.015169209,0.00022783678,0.00024572827,0.33888945,0.46472883,0.15427361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006999581,0.000048718237,0.023778802,0.0030029393,0.00007359223,0.0009805114,0.023258323,0.0005024224,0.00034363885,0.17026217,0.7775515,0.00012748344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03833054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06493276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015510148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034637082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11253452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082307966","doi":"10.1075/jerpp.20008.faz","title":"Gray areas of academic publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Publishing; Computer science; Library science; Computer graphics (images); Art history; Art; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.783837671672554,"score_gpt":0.6282425791465481,"score_spread":0.1555950925260059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082307966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034648417,0.015318085,0.0015959109,0.039614838,0.010122087,0.00019464789,0.0024838834,0.0017641267,0.9254416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09135802,0.026668608,0.0056482214,0.011473049,0.011493145,0.00043539374,0.004100402,0.001933931,0.8468892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928637,0.0012453126,0.0004752646,0.0009784256,0.0032108414,0.001226573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773107,0.0033360948,0.0019234589,0.0037747915,0.007924777,0.005730111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063184258,0.0012961846,0.0016161313,0.011234895,0.0041611195,0.026926981,0.0018201475,0.0034943975,0.3722198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023580765,0.0006219616,0.0006397677,0.01670692,0.0062074894,0.013338834,0.009317484,0.0024470694,0.23063907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041876254,0.000022794144,0.00052704004,0.00039966704,0.00000939821,0.000061726176,0.0005950602,0.000052527048,0.00017115577,0.09942019,0.77468365,0.12401479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070856677,0.0000144795395,0.0014971169,0.00035217346,0.0000057564384,0.000082717444,0.0005544898,0.000062587686,0.0001447107,0.031702843,0.9655676,0.000008432038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002659659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032328777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99368155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042313663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100005185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89545226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082822271","doi":"10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0082","title":"Evaluating Journal Impact Factor: a systematic survey of the pros and cons, and overview of alternative measures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital; Impact; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Quality (philosophy); Data science; Information retrieval; Medical physics; Medicine; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.7686354890913598,"score_gpt":0.5833849753578085,"score_spread":0.18525051373355128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082822271","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01956867,0.96202093,0.006144254,0.003588972,0.0006379117,0.0029850656,0.002832987,0.000120869314,0.0021003047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18686037,0.7572307,0.0401967,0.0024219328,0.0005797564,0.009831155,0.002411957,0.00015077779,0.0003165492],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6978664,0.11280797,0.11530317,0.008993604,0.06329996,0.0017288679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28178206,0.57197607,0.0753368,0.010036403,0.057928205,0.0029404778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25214094,0.0022828477,0.008938906,0.07811966,0.0025071097,0.010111958,0.0037568663,0.0028003238,0.0024669091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5184232,0.0020227134,0.009972467,0.084271744,0.005173468,0.015131566,0.0050416477,0.002847752,0.00050575583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004889435,0.00010624048,0.03686455,0.5716256,0.0095095625,0.00012774269,0.0048176954,0.00046722658,0.0003321388,0.0021639464,0.004828192,0.36866817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000422477,0.0012943351,0.07367233,0.816294,0.025528576,0.0011242784,0.01085845,0.0012985822,0.0011494831,0.006424568,0.06139816,0.00053464907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054266346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013849033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92188036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012597054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029144205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92224336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083346991","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: APA 6th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Style (visual arts); Library science; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.47545432765403034,"score_gpt":0.5455816070485985,"score_spread":0.07012727939456814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083346991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001723211,0.011901172,0.034748863,0.0073692393,0.011179498,0.002194736,0.3850388,0.043893393,0.50195104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004649214,0.021145537,0.08623575,0.002067228,0.0025479177,0.005554755,0.32369393,0.020681677,0.53342414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914528,0.0015127705,0.0018309588,0.0004282091,0.0045343535,0.0002408551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617007,0.0101735005,0.0021293927,0.0031007782,0.021993749,0.0009020019],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059883883,0.0022678594,0.002749214,0.027104149,0.0020927468,0.008847652,0.0032434203,0.0018335135,0.3002309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045978654,0.0018323411,0.0011088088,0.050829727,0.0008715039,0.007934375,0.002946569,0.0037232614,0.37341434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019917592,0.000018017501,0.00012700948,0.00067183364,0.00000745906,0.000013776607,0.00009215442,0.00010081782,0.0001372386,0.002203861,0.93723214,0.05937581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009573528,0.000013921592,0.00085558894,0.00040682487,0.000005869216,0.000054440556,0.0000602993,0.00013446825,0.00017399194,0.0024298045,0.9958319,0.000023292143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011832463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022519741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99115235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026516167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010886301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085773434","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03701-4","title":"Classifications of science and their effects on bibliometric evaluations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Discipline; Computer science; Order (exchange); Scientometrics; Data science; Management science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.7109975348963583,"score_gpt":0.6052004678785627,"score_spread":0.10579706701779557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085773434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93935025,0.009932089,0.007051562,0.003965358,0.0006917418,0.00024619952,0.0034253127,0.00045134706,0.034886163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939721,0.0009236734,0.0019679435,0.000149774,0.00022893371,0.00012355206,0.00075606,0.00015498025,0.0017229284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8992841,0.07408002,0.0063214176,0.0044122003,0.012293461,0.003608681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07682848,0.8797772,0.020961761,0.0075825686,0.011180652,0.003669314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09189851,0.0014865715,0.0023749028,0.012635242,0.0022104483,0.012292353,0.0017421162,0.003253034,0.012269038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5658939,0.0005292338,0.003245524,0.015349392,0.004169274,0.0065329424,0.0047043697,0.0049436796,0.0016612271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01760007,0.0022029872,0.83757037,0.0018811288,0.004006881,0.0004571428,0.0026825068,0.010507368,0.003312023,0.018715536,0.00604687,0.09501714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007869804,0.0019006259,0.93036777,0.0008428256,0.005888468,0.00043318278,0.0033065036,0.02035755,0.0036570542,0.026938325,0.0052479063,0.00027291692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00799349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005691784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98736477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037491536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48601156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087051796","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.12572","title":"Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Medicine; Observational study; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Library science; Subject (documents); Epidemiology; Public health; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Political science; Computer science; Nursing; Pathology","score_opus":0.8631862053463923,"score_gpt":0.6652655756134336,"score_spread":0.19792062973295876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087051796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7716185,0.10609252,0.009956633,0.0028277906,0.00066795165,0.0034155073,0.07980261,0.001007237,0.02461118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91070384,0.036949657,0.02060832,0.00027083082,0.0007800154,0.00360884,0.02461481,0.00018418874,0.0022794204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752391,0.0035765464,0.0074218027,0.0020151446,0.010855553,0.0008919265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9266191,0.037076037,0.014977387,0.0022621618,0.017236318,0.0018289799],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017655103,0.0011586949,0.0035108912,0.15704514,0.001773172,0.0085117975,0.0015632787,0.0010729561,0.005760438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09458974,0.0004460457,0.0035230215,0.14455485,0.0010295493,0.0038789932,0.0031592653,0.0005202685,0.0013485337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010973001,0.00037628112,0.53814864,0.07133958,0.006599529,0.0010333718,0.0062871045,0.0025440285,0.0034752095,0.0042158714,0.017682979,0.34719998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888783,0.0006455762,0.8790276,0.009796702,0.009246407,0.0029298316,0.012445914,0.005852448,0.004186894,0.009545379,0.06570166,0.0003328297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021591636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019196613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002592005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048818574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09337026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087208738","doi":"10.1111/beer.12318","title":"BE:ER is beyond suppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics A European Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Conversation; Impact factor; Analytics; Citation; Media studies; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Data science; Law","score_opus":0.8419737768635476,"score_gpt":0.6014730456877927,"score_spread":0.24050073117575488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087208738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015542574,0.006486865,0.005824212,0.58577913,0.16913755,0.00007466421,0.0005366467,0.004202258,0.22640446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03941304,0.009179193,0.0052173133,0.32927433,0.07223666,0.0001802775,0.0010439146,0.0071407976,0.53631455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9573795,0.009247753,0.0030367058,0.0038834093,0.023324324,0.003128285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8626753,0.037936337,0.009302912,0.018643087,0.057479355,0.013963075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026733479,0.0013357805,0.0016582333,0.0020214787,0.006392169,0.038908426,0.0028625017,0.011130249,0.14318828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17777714,0.0007760101,0.0013961523,0.002736121,0.009481256,0.036984008,0.011111083,0.018357141,0.20408979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033282166,0.000013066811,0.00007812017,0.00012889055,0.0000073209376,0.00009027715,0.0007220065,0.000023187831,0.00016431531,0.028278269,0.95057523,0.019886045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004488102,0.000007945309,0.00005723351,0.00010890478,0.0000023249174,0.000108284956,0.00040927116,0.00002945415,0.00010237226,0.0036349487,0.99552083,0.0000139189415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014260414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017777864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14318828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047208644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006912645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47901255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088110085","doi":"10.1002/asi.24472","title":"The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Excellence; China; Political science; Regional science; Economic growth; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.2331593821368919,"score_gpt":0.5033470671943766,"score_spread":0.2701876850574847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088110085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96633774,0.005396443,0.0021601412,0.0044458355,0.0001658354,0.000018480307,0.0008394201,0.000043765933,0.02059227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987318,0.0004247956,0.00024839267,0.00009235885,0.00005804703,0.000003621099,0.00008183516,0.000004213282,0.00035483253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98828787,0.00477509,0.0010571928,0.0018536475,0.0027511443,0.001275109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8655508,0.059009418,0.04980779,0.005644751,0.008778853,0.011208362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005898851,0.00014529274,0.00042723172,0.0071943537,0.0016926893,0.005366965,0.0007249156,0.0009081595,0.0076253223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342689,0.00023333197,0.00023921656,0.014783692,0.0022320834,0.0048955,0.0050167376,0.0011335775,0.00068332686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002313817,0.00007917836,0.89059067,0.0004331247,0.00022197227,0.00067774847,0.009222175,0.000984942,0.0012037267,0.028041853,0.0035355345,0.06477766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036135803,0.00014111599,0.9096107,0.00061244145,0.00014922528,0.0010191028,0.025280554,0.001316118,0.0015646096,0.022796925,0.037392687,0.000080358324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022643704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034628308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99410117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017986216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001519028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031196475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088224047","doi":"10.29173/istl51","title":"Investigating Science Researchers’ Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workflow; World Wide Web; Library science; Meaning (existential); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.8119318843063014,"score_gpt":0.5884236921038694,"score_spread":0.223508192202432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088224047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98786527,0.00036534996,0.00041591623,0.0020248278,0.00003013433,0.00014732966,0.00021251432,0.000029156989,0.008909557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901046,0.0010638129,0.0016789298,0.00075901527,0.000025319408,0.00008150329,0.00017905542,0.000044508663,0.0060631386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887515,0.0044069104,0.00038598722,0.00084882946,0.0028636714,0.0027430698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662352,0.013952718,0.0031344255,0.0013682515,0.008805165,0.0065042786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010231527,0.00051789236,0.0007684152,0.0076788277,0.025702713,0.008540203,0.002514148,0.0026553709,0.0029493147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024016418,0.00061750686,0.0005148226,0.01178801,0.006051691,0.0039801807,0.0056230854,0.0023846691,0.00077576085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012983647,0.0005409745,0.093218945,0.0003245542,0.000030828956,0.007452551,0.8590922,0.00015177685,0.0017413279,0.0031325957,0.0040051844,0.030179342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010471105,0.000089484674,0.032540612,0.00014269137,0.00002427006,0.0006543125,0.94487906,0.000304974,0.000493925,0.00021445815,0.020585343,0.000060436614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81236863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92348623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036736026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04923578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3774727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088999864","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Entrepreneurship: In Ottawa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Political science","score_opus":0.9595516944596619,"score_gpt":0.7220228475040606,"score_spread":0.23752884695560128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088999864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03768251,0.16220401,0.005748515,0.11180921,0.0049776942,0.000515556,0.050395586,0.0021121544,0.6245548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07559794,0.040828485,0.007221683,0.001808929,0.00024609725,0.00021179573,0.006351782,0.0006678465,0.8670655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388367,0.0009862145,0.0008437687,0.00083133555,0.0026253117,0.0008296656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835307,0.0051596975,0.00095761084,0.001295519,0.006094778,0.0029616258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005709664,0.00095670443,0.001010685,0.009458459,0.008042849,0.015491368,0.0018077004,0.0032643976,0.058721185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015929608,0.0012415674,0.00046015801,0.029101666,0.006840246,0.006808457,0.004880732,0.0033152478,0.013059219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024004064,0.000062224404,0.0096668415,0.0020480147,0.000036282298,0.00034604818,0.011186922,0.0008297711,0.00048833434,0.12395267,0.60972315,0.24141978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017860937,0.000016109872,0.01772174,0.0006758285,0.000020738165,0.00007545597,0.005127951,0.00019939792,0.00049961015,0.004487247,0.9710812,0.000076918455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91391325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058157995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14391597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42196774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089103538","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/8hp7m","title":"The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; Santa Clara University; Harvard University","keywords":"Productivity; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Promotion (chess); Preprint; Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Medicine; Politics; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7447279426623729,"score_gpt":0.600916010677361,"score_spread":0.14381193198501185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089103538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70848256,0.010815154,0.006114867,0.13740194,0.0025968587,0.000114570794,0.003663957,0.0001674235,0.13064265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869583,0.0019318432,0.0008542991,0.0048510893,0.0006144824,0.000043440592,0.0003703044,0.00006942939,0.0043067425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933768,0.0027671177,0.00032433504,0.00090205646,0.0014512321,0.0011784022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95361537,0.027237894,0.009667296,0.002536474,0.0035945722,0.003348408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009246047,0.00035810602,0.00047117547,0.0022789682,0.0034911395,0.0061871144,0.0010514511,0.0015988467,0.016002094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048529975,0.00020687545,0.00071656413,0.0039189556,0.00442351,0.006285317,0.006187305,0.0028827637,0.0016905426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011774296,0.00029634056,0.5243119,0.00076379365,0.00032421676,0.001588994,0.046053387,0.0017524569,0.0017221166,0.12917255,0.0638364,0.22900036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008766923,0.00063729344,0.5954437,0.0015722291,0.00019966529,0.0011112539,0.11504286,0.0022076657,0.0024331335,0.11578538,0.16525495,0.00022409037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008757326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012022164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035778077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042585987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053532302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090451087","doi":"10.1111/ibi.12887","title":"Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ibis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ornithology; White (mutation); Visual arts; Art; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.8358054303363317,"score_gpt":0.6612376043798455,"score_spread":0.17456782595648623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090451087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03252347,0.029143106,0.046989888,0.62445873,0.031166602,0.01397511,0.01857486,0.009030417,0.19413777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20649418,0.052538242,0.54196095,0.06969969,0.010106273,0.029500816,0.02027244,0.0047068996,0.064720504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6817091,0.16921367,0.058907185,0.005961555,0.077681,0.0065274653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11733808,0.33136576,0.04246883,0.043692846,0.44925073,0.015883807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3022207,0.0014498181,0.0024776103,0.036088906,0.005069314,0.032565534,0.0067666005,0.0075224554,0.05514915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7626239,0.0016668974,0.0033498567,0.04390447,0.0063094506,0.036368735,0.008978608,0.0060378043,0.022535933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026470143,0.0002941314,0.010843616,0.00939482,0.00013821176,0.00017600159,0.0052643605,0.0005149233,0.0006700205,0.010346048,0.53583914,0.42625394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035926705,0.00028609307,0.043398593,0.034993317,0.000363013,0.0002877548,0.020087255,0.0016248731,0.0017044528,0.018715626,0.87775767,0.00042215857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027165199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02684313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6977793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141751915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043105982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091945448","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1216","title":"Advancing in the institutionalization of Evidence-Informed Policy in Brazil","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Evidence-based practice; Knowledge translation; Public relations; Evidence-based policy; Business; Scientific evidence; Political science; Nursing; Medicine; Knowledge management; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8408744498340404,"score_gpt":0.639742881482103,"score_spread":0.20113156835193735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091945448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59231955,0.009076685,0.042021323,0.20485084,0.00051294744,0.0014462552,0.00049967255,0.00043367266,0.14883903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920366,0.0004951292,0.004938314,0.0011807871,0.000028768705,0.00014710422,0.000042247193,0.000023649469,0.0011075586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9243917,0.052262552,0.0044310093,0.0038966413,0.008347869,0.0066702175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8548289,0.08219768,0.016254963,0.019010935,0.015646758,0.01206075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06895119,0.00034772418,0.000569266,0.0023713503,0.0047334903,0.009485203,0.0025798879,0.0018824312,0.0020692586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10978819,0.0007817601,0.0006529198,0.0027912413,0.013049219,0.004696299,0.011594187,0.0034309244,0.00014068253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010161165,0.00024718716,0.06550682,0.0017896822,0.00019370345,0.0018706585,0.16932946,0.0032201903,0.0039007843,0.5951669,0.0074748383,0.15119822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018331446,0.00046671598,0.15774319,0.008489315,0.00018061361,0.0016016084,0.1446925,0.010506129,0.005442216,0.17002909,0.5003369,0.00032837354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064723045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05293425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06895119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029786663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09464589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3646531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091984948","doi":"10.3917/enic.027.0027","title":"Stratégies numériques de diffusion auprès des décideurs, des résultats des chercheurs en santé publique","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Enjeux de l information et de la communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.35600400407758664,"score_gpt":0.5158816207712876,"score_spread":0.15987761669370099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091984948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077941574,0.022137284,0.4973919,0.036314953,0.00081274606,0.0012303729,0.0019551227,0.00080437504,0.36141172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71693176,0.014467143,0.2229418,0.0020749774,0.00048629547,0.0027164286,0.0009771787,0.00043803905,0.038966358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739203,0.013956511,0.0020224028,0.0036378612,0.005503439,0.00095963635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984113,0.077891774,0.0067981724,0.005882677,0.009654148,0.0013618924],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027231839,0.0016248294,0.0016199836,0.0075525753,0.0032703874,0.01764881,0.0023627507,0.0039162687,0.02807426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11597881,0.0010743041,0.0021050512,0.0056048012,0.008304834,0.01649734,0.0057973107,0.003434572,0.0037620042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009878871,0.00008308616,0.0091681685,0.0012986772,0.00021265716,0.00019381185,0.0075836894,0.006989394,0.0005426611,0.85281664,0.0041763787,0.11683606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008032006,0.00018483138,0.0062423153,0.0022222993,0.00027840096,0.0004482949,0.008652966,0.02463098,0.0016069622,0.8438997,0.11161698,0.00013601682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098844655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007793342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010172355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012073738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14401746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093162091","doi":"10.1177/0306312720966649","title":"The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Construct (python library); Social media; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Social media analytics; Social science; Political science; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.629742310229162,"score_gpt":0.585563795919583,"score_spread":0.04417851430957909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093162091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099193476,0.012288406,0.28432414,0.059016474,0.00095945667,0.0006272335,0.001293834,0.0004451997,0.54185176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346999,0.0060317507,0.029107183,0.0026918338,0.001887644,0.0007897891,0.000279033,0.00012509836,0.02438777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997451,0.0010928251,0.000081219725,0.00046301069,0.0006210829,0.00029084182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855402,0.010755771,0.0014692073,0.0007951096,0.00084400753,0.0005956766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043117944,0.00093107735,0.0008480274,0.00795952,0.003803737,0.013628519,0.0024507781,0.0043391236,0.018470338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015894618,0.0006317951,0.0011998729,0.006442929,0.013137311,0.029790536,0.0046032905,0.0025602037,0.0019089426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013020677,0.000020747242,0.0005357034,0.000045453653,0.000010976814,0.00006276846,0.00077843724,0.0006616943,0.000071453,0.990983,0.0013845557,0.0054321713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028905091,0.000023618008,0.0006923253,0.00010349347,0.000012999639,0.00011275422,0.0007177097,0.0100062,0.000094158386,0.97047865,0.017700808,0.000028343931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004199585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015711534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99619627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051093623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002210649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061789453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093804023","doi":"10.1108/lht-06-2020-0131","title":"A bibliometric analysis and science mapping of scientific publications of Alzahra University during 1986–2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Originality; Ranking (information retrieval); Library science; Scientific literature; Data science; Computer science; Medicine; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Social science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.33417652347373894,"score_gpt":0.43836533492749663,"score_spread":0.10418881145375769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093804023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550886,0.008893651,0.0010109611,0.0011981607,0.0001234014,0.00020252647,0.015176787,0.00016139797,0.018144613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875772,0.003367318,0.001513469,0.00003955014,0.00014471257,0.00012697125,0.005735804,0.000012917921,0.0014821314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967309,0.00033316214,0.0005231309,0.0002296681,0.0019455308,0.00023748612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910391,0.0023292783,0.0027104432,0.00025514988,0.0033140352,0.00035192925],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033745128,0.00042411132,0.00065142685,0.04900742,0.0009957564,0.0024143264,0.00056742737,0.0003966338,0.0026926463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013638876,0.00012331577,0.00092886126,0.055320572,0.00035994314,0.0015925348,0.000978542,0.0003375241,0.00069691014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022285388,0.00017837716,0.84060377,0.0017338153,0.00031156087,0.00045928024,0.0018081492,0.0025144021,0.0006874807,0.0015541436,0.008448313,0.14147778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009294341,0.0000841473,0.9828478,0.00023304805,0.00017574319,0.000430583,0.0024439022,0.002031074,0.00071906875,0.00037156203,0.010623565,0.000030112858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013151376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009132689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028415907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004875598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02614963},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3094319664","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040950","title":"Cross-sectional analysis of bibliometrics and altmetrics: comparing the impact of qualitative and quantitative articles in the <i>British Medical Journal</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Percentile; Citation; Scopus; Web of science; Qualitative research; Percentile rank; Citation analysis; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Data science; Library science; Statistics; Social science; Internal medicine; Mann–Whitney U test","score_opus":0.8703207022660916,"score_gpt":0.7230511385471123,"score_spread":0.14726956371897926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094319664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670633,0.0038645305,0.0072916355,0.0007630186,0.00014045453,0.00072179205,0.012808403,0.00019771708,0.007149146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895069,0.00072126475,0.003362334,0.00016818567,0.00017883407,0.0009979379,0.0045291344,0.000038770893,0.0004966845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591619,0.013976752,0.010200612,0.0029004435,0.012849736,0.00091056287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66552424,0.16136557,0.11044696,0.012226912,0.046965543,0.0034707885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04098163,0.00044891858,0.001082985,0.025815703,0.00064158667,0.0030803753,0.0007010074,0.00072679704,0.003217813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17677566,0.00040552914,0.0017135221,0.031847246,0.0011595195,0.0039766324,0.0021891803,0.0006062126,0.0009012217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028202185,0.00008633322,0.97971594,0.00092974206,0.001270279,0.000055330507,0.0013225053,0.00022980689,0.00039449462,0.00049359584,0.0013078882,0.01391192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023135673,0.0003106218,0.99369377,0.00020678026,0.00032811455,0.00021337163,0.0013695824,0.0006068985,0.00059270323,0.00044295215,0.0021773777,0.000034659326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014140758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015083733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015648104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013467855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21673417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094933057","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.1.01","title":"Branding Spin-Off Scholarly Journals: Transmuting Symbolic Capital into Economic Capital","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Symbolic capital; Capital (architecture); Brand names; Economics; Sociology; Business; Marketing; History; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.41356925951913204,"score_gpt":0.49444687481835053,"score_spread":0.0808776152992185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094933057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66943187,0.0023612035,0.107674085,0.007079498,0.00027009004,0.0002634133,0.00015869425,0.00023802073,0.21252319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876478,0.00052568223,0.0055394405,0.00015605356,0.00010075364,0.000030259116,0.000024737054,0.00001895963,0.005956425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998511,0.00039034008,0.000058623504,0.00018064717,0.0004952039,0.00036414032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930106,0.0030330284,0.001563716,0.001015391,0.0006846941,0.0006925507],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002052371,0.0004920695,0.00036869087,0.002150545,0.0016876943,0.01017443,0.0011445408,0.0015746977,0.0072639054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009063424,0.0002787585,0.0004672066,0.0026118502,0.006548906,0.0077213827,0.0032285631,0.0014764294,0.0008972552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014184343,0.0003702673,0.019474775,0.00017643764,0.00008536793,0.00081200176,0.003886399,0.01015995,0.0032709881,0.8706779,0.0018271888,0.08911693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013291162,0.000509257,0.051845506,0.0004139464,0.00019126119,0.0010813479,0.009539068,0.05363016,0.010714645,0.8111534,0.060572658,0.00021575662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002807725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023259171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98982555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044549666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021157456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03232324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095248707","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0240903","title":"Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Elite; Productivity; Geography; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.8224016831196271,"score_gpt":0.5038969817465725,"score_spread":0.31850470137305464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095248707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937516,0.0007242272,0.00011219302,0.00061960437,0.000010485655,0.0000121583425,0.00063987717,0.0000040083064,0.0041258237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869436,0.0003598707,0.000067153975,0.000067805486,0.0000050796534,0.00000793885,0.00022138623,0.000002740714,0.00057362404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972492,0.00022233656,0.00012900685,0.00040696294,0.0006959534,0.0012965382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895298,0.002580963,0.0024963098,0.00046431227,0.002538411,0.0023902399],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033545834,0.00023326436,0.00072571775,0.0060022073,0.0048416904,0.0030758276,0.0006224405,0.00041481643,0.002538327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015636982,0.0001322035,0.000275615,0.0113695795,0.0017811931,0.0013117328,0.0027192482,0.00060507405,0.00017616231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022470373,0.00003815563,0.9363698,0.00010433194,0.00006881054,0.00019056522,0.025225144,0.00021607094,0.00037501066,0.0041747326,0.0016272456,0.031385444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089717205,0.000021584978,0.9682985,0.00010229707,0.000028728458,0.000053814976,0.026092744,0.0002640145,0.00025403636,0.0012067977,0.003648619,0.00001989461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83540004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90413433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011417235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023226488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3311386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095929879","doi":"10.17821/srels/2020/v57i3/148391","title":"Citation Trend of Byline and Dateline Articles of “The Guardian”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SRELS Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Guardian; Citation; Audience measurement; Psychology; Library science; Media studies; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.43724117568909476,"score_gpt":0.4921982558167358,"score_spread":0.054957080127641056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095929879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740226,0.0065581547,0.00031263178,0.0004292712,0.00008569836,0.00001920649,0.012031967,0.000044246626,0.0064961216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97579044,0.004739312,0.00065695366,0.00006168922,0.00019228537,0.000024485027,0.0124057885,0.000026133766,0.0061029308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905545,0.00014306465,0.00021415703,0.00015615183,0.00033192735,0.00009934042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889297,0.0021876823,0.004470793,0.00036995715,0.0036263536,0.00041539074],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008841113,0.00015022724,0.00025302632,0.0149738025,0.00035853387,0.0012965557,0.0002778121,0.00024391632,0.0022920815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065790736,0.000059631882,0.00028116448,0.01794918,0.0002091384,0.0008486665,0.00038774678,0.00018318379,0.0008238861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003755575,0.00003346761,0.8838473,0.0010210711,0.00014904661,0.00067260157,0.002428242,0.00020081563,0.0036047567,0.0010462176,0.006898754,0.09972224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035500661,0.00006408052,0.9724698,0.000111240464,0.000083638784,0.0007251527,0.001701617,0.00030637535,0.0015116998,0.00014473418,0.022865338,0.000012909725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006185206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010546274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061629247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006137576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012298405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095982673","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8","title":"Mapping computer science research in Africa: using academic networking sites for assessing research activity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Sorel-Tracy; McGill University; Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Productivity; Regional science; Citation; Database; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9631006661554827,"score_gpt":0.7125945034653474,"score_spread":0.25050616269013537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095982673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749332,0.0014021714,0.0048368275,0.00038112534,0.000027419821,0.00014310033,0.0019396849,0.000056019602,0.016280504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98666334,0.000962652,0.010597791,0.000018921739,0.000016175996,0.00008640351,0.0005712076,0.000010792382,0.0010725412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.0007242446,0.000107238666,0.00013239277,0.0003587735,0.00019854693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915503,0.0041014645,0.002141242,0.00026379176,0.0014034567,0.00053973665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019702278,0.00044953177,0.00028115025,0.017572125,0.00080185436,0.002442744,0.00040858475,0.0005624233,0.0020350805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013527866,0.00015276935,0.00024039591,0.019024843,0.0003471591,0.0023900864,0.0010905956,0.000280051,0.0004191847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019410379,0.00019060544,0.69249004,0.0008942358,0.00013996207,0.00033079533,0.0043237368,0.0026052278,0.0055412087,0.0038045344,0.0014774477,0.2880082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048251055,0.00043826527,0.88438654,0.0009560559,0.0004202109,0.0014183816,0.031564184,0.023120118,0.011986626,0.006079612,0.039503608,0.000078163175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072976737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013935587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008409275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016288171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014510393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097147709","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.008","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of systematic review and meta analyses published in the top 5 “high-impact” radiology journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Imaging","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Medicine; Web of science; Citation; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Subject (documents); Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Science Citation Index; Citation impact; Library science; Medical physics; Pathology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9295006509261213,"score_gpt":0.7433835110658059,"score_spread":0.18611713986031542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097147709","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09073809,0.86626834,0.0077658813,0.0021959054,0.0014534952,0.0031114803,0.023337945,0.0005571891,0.0045717177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78014326,0.1820036,0.015981281,0.0009166572,0.0018112129,0.004916075,0.012862287,0.00028263117,0.0010830248],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8080957,0.068802096,0.07972038,0.0099817375,0.03132018,0.0020799055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62414455,0.27104336,0.057145387,0.014677639,0.030892754,0.002096214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.105859496,0.0041919323,0.025359746,0.1476496,0.0025787079,0.0105997035,0.0032555799,0.0023765776,0.004785408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39579347,0.0017844264,0.052723143,0.11637591,0.0021167456,0.0060839863,0.0061485553,0.0020297195,0.00060576556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033683958,0.00010097245,0.062741116,0.19275579,0.69729,0.0002466646,0.0006773997,0.0012205584,0.00048958923,0.0005567092,0.0024506585,0.03810211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009877266,0.00052567007,0.06847227,0.021183189,0.89671093,0.000674294,0.0007122039,0.0015290828,0.0006592773,0.0020172836,0.006327388,0.00020072605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008261137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147142075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006147451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01204762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5598452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097159753","doi":"10.7554/elife.60586","title":"Task specialization across research careers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; European Commission","keywords":"Archetype; Career path; Career Pathways; Task (project management); Career development; Psychology; Medical education; Management; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.9054869539191018,"score_gpt":0.7027200146581738,"score_spread":0.20276693926092804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097159753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94837666,0.0025434718,0.01894856,0.0010229414,0.00009686156,0.00015111658,0.0039371187,0.00028659336,0.024636673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984373,0.0010015928,0.0060611367,0.00013884052,0.000058003436,0.00016333019,0.0039659543,0.00010942686,0.0041287425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372464,0.0017859334,0.0006448943,0.0015918055,0.0012405828,0.0010122185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583593,0.019083705,0.0073601766,0.0044128667,0.006237893,0.0045460607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010250077,0.00060144346,0.00066126813,0.0066774813,0.0014353339,0.0033425973,0.00084454217,0.0009123364,0.008194798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053985126,0.00046459262,0.0009355334,0.0065456033,0.0010116127,0.0025003168,0.004093342,0.000963883,0.003225906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014661454,0.00025698458,0.796718,0.001157942,0.00031184257,0.000492283,0.010017617,0.0069006197,0.0053648553,0.010442471,0.006304992,0.16056623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007873091,0.0002078967,0.9170643,0.00044832434,0.00016288427,0.00088805554,0.005283637,0.018153906,0.001828297,0.033036627,0.02276116,0.00008613796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045829983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006221982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015344474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023853898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05420822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097729089","doi":"","title":"Science to Action: Metrics for Societal Impact of Research—What Do We Value, and How Do We Capture It? Posters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AGU Fall Meeting 2018","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.546729190997117,"score_gpt":0.5950516069654634,"score_spread":0.04832241596834641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097729089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03520718,0.04145632,0.08664561,0.64735496,0.028820723,0.001218211,0.010744515,0.0032748377,0.14527762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6352386,0.03854731,0.2173446,0.035463482,0.02043097,0.0029414238,0.009314468,0.002520121,0.038199015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.945515,0.032466218,0.0037420038,0.0017001942,0.015266459,0.0013101235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85065514,0.07255398,0.015873576,0.010498909,0.043394346,0.007023997],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066621505,0.0021380922,0.0018287646,0.022613782,0.00310008,0.01951168,0.0015027999,0.003918386,0.01908642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23940611,0.0006356745,0.0021973199,0.02016957,0.005215005,0.018235154,0.0057221293,0.0049982467,0.0071224906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027793238,0.0001945337,0.015788553,0.0019201902,0.00047272662,0.000065179396,0.0030960154,0.0015716972,0.0006219842,0.099585466,0.3539116,0.5224941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016324387,0.00049089105,0.04351922,0.0074598882,0.00067598466,0.00030371104,0.010726272,0.008903523,0.003509853,0.41416126,0.5095377,0.00054840225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003036276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004865376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97738624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009044399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008391504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3523324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099052861","doi":"10.1101/400515","title":"Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Homophily; Confounding; Demographics; Logistic regression; Demography; Psychology; Medicine; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.36380063591881673,"score_gpt":0.4836889474673257,"score_spread":0.11988831154850899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099052861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96229184,0.0049506784,0.012675609,0.003914287,0.00034079325,0.00028854975,0.00072427857,0.00011141783,0.014702585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983979,0.00018669521,0.00062069827,0.00014396092,0.00010624817,0.000030915235,0.000062722786,0.000014837564,0.00043592812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.84027153,0.10777969,0.014405343,0.011852869,0.021919983,0.0037705572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38170594,0.40771055,0.13452403,0.03954465,0.027200881,0.009313943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07979623,0.00019662685,0.00091683463,0.0033241115,0.0019849914,0.004042556,0.0012843424,0.0008451524,0.007188365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32258314,0.00035382007,0.0006640036,0.003261581,0.0028307766,0.003159028,0.0035248604,0.0012007036,0.00078087667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035229127,0.00012667503,0.94537616,0.00049199094,0.0007698569,0.0002554356,0.010218063,0.00041898567,0.00037716932,0.0036773435,0.0025500397,0.035386063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005322566,0.00027328325,0.97202796,0.00043431637,0.00023416076,0.00091393053,0.006719524,0.0021471502,0.0008859238,0.008297271,0.007923509,0.000089715104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023537748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003500109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015114378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026811438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42200786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099302673","doi":"10.2196/21931","title":"Analysis of the Trends in Publications on Clinical Cancer Research in Mainland China from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Bibliometric Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Informatics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Epidemiology; Mainland China; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; Cancer; China; Database; Colorectal cancer; Cancer registry; Oncology; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.7422395863740804,"score_gpt":0.6666343565151769,"score_spread":0.0756052298589035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099302673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69512635,0.17303775,0.0010352753,0.002721632,0.00027602116,0.00041258047,0.1191802,0.00024560367,0.007964632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85512537,0.083139755,0.0026388373,0.0005556926,0.00043459653,0.0007055772,0.055996567,0.000053971533,0.0013495927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216485,0.00074760185,0.0030831094,0.0010522516,0.002543074,0.0004092287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96398866,0.014514526,0.011510056,0.0008948597,0.0076325363,0.0014594371],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006261405,0.0006941993,0.002150902,0.08238125,0.0007881889,0.0028885633,0.0010181726,0.00061874586,0.0025767707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023373596,0.000281703,0.001955478,0.12980923,0.0005458325,0.0022926528,0.001329536,0.0004006573,0.00047250028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002935547,0.00005815341,0.8816172,0.02891936,0.0030585194,0.00093862053,0.0015728263,0.0005848857,0.0011541217,0.0009265164,0.010717938,0.070158385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062498075,0.00009118062,0.97614914,0.002686483,0.0026416404,0.00095459603,0.0018117953,0.0010250632,0.0005758919,0.00043350793,0.013521548,0.000046658126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009854163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016084345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021501419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005535616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033113897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099820958","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p295","title":"Academic Rank and Position Effect on Academic Research Output – A Case Study of Ariel University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Rank (graph theory); Citation; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Association (psychology); Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5460896587659517,"score_gpt":0.6214405482825802,"score_spread":0.0753508895166285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099820958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99683243,0.00015084668,0.00016792284,0.00026263657,0.000004114018,0.000008894256,0.000037187707,0.000005634963,0.0025302465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779993,0.00022323676,0.00033919865,0.000035758643,0.00001777111,0.000009978544,0.000055545665,0.000005069831,0.0015134363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967776,0.0017541684,0.00015620151,0.00020733892,0.0005883037,0.00051634293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829609,0.011723637,0.0015275986,0.00042374842,0.001560911,0.0018031244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00512023,0.0002525797,0.00053097645,0.0034104462,0.0028374607,0.003375366,0.00079597335,0.0007937287,0.0044886954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012057749,0.0001383935,0.00058750913,0.004902746,0.00094534113,0.0013929118,0.001827855,0.0009319041,0.000598119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063445745,0.0032564322,0.8446383,0.00027988863,0.00014324204,0.017641129,0.02922586,0.0026377616,0.0012546143,0.008328536,0.001656342,0.09030342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001341452,0.0014962482,0.8355689,0.00017943562,0.0002670161,0.005695544,0.120476335,0.01266192,0.0031084325,0.004137618,0.016144382,0.00012995428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015556847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021835923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99658954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026492116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003070079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030932605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102086983","doi":"10.1017/iop.2020.52","title":"I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Transparency (behavior); Ranking (information retrieval); Psychology; Top-down and bottom-up design; Social psychology; Information retrieval; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.7726359127152311,"score_gpt":0.5716448110506561,"score_spread":0.200991101664575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102086983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16005713,0.042644393,0.03756198,0.5060866,0.015245257,0.00053286843,0.005422098,0.0012627885,0.23118694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92981225,0.010355121,0.02418783,0.020141715,0.0073027713,0.00023021983,0.0014568329,0.0005394694,0.0059738853],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388622,0.028180102,0.0071556577,0.002226939,0.019088117,0.004486942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52820903,0.23537794,0.07505824,0.020173855,0.09889671,0.04228419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07436781,0.0005996416,0.0022105733,0.021653978,0.0039809444,0.03302496,0.0020519032,0.002870985,0.011228625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42580098,0.00054160494,0.0011469864,0.025106885,0.00492284,0.015395859,0.00687407,0.0045893826,0.0046376903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018911132,0.00032201808,0.14417556,0.0039415085,0.0010353051,0.00037988802,0.0077478867,0.0013739045,0.0017091214,0.11485776,0.21480742,0.5077585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007109991,0.00075157126,0.30894765,0.012338345,0.0010939671,0.00093835726,0.024262572,0.005853636,0.0053284927,0.34180304,0.29710758,0.0008638334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007268852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013936996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97834605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047635296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011877676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39329928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104534219","doi":"10.2501/jar-2020-028","title":"A 60-Year Bibliographic Review of the <i>Journal of Advertising Research</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advertising Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Library science; Scale (ratio); Web of science; Institution; Political science; World Wide Web; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Geography; MEDLINE; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7066735306888975,"score_gpt":0.6260799739364323,"score_spread":0.08059355675246516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104534219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009310731,0.9485673,0.0014106212,0.0148932,0.007104805,0.00016243376,0.0059248195,0.00016038082,0.012465767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03452641,0.93403023,0.0038511402,0.0063618436,0.0061674216,0.00018272968,0.009936779,0.00013024101,0.004813143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918143,0.0013851101,0.0024492647,0.00068814366,0.0032831815,0.0003799156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9158605,0.023993606,0.010510048,0.0027182316,0.04435619,0.0025614547],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012611208,0.00092865067,0.0016694799,0.10046763,0.0019213312,0.0049851188,0.0010625705,0.0013820825,0.004638778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041038577,0.00093866984,0.0019316771,0.09220538,0.001315805,0.005768423,0.0019183104,0.0018158755,0.0028588793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019783725,0.00013357287,0.016416367,0.049426332,0.0011804545,0.0006141359,0.0016638839,0.00030208926,0.003589442,0.003980335,0.26423144,0.6582641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011709553,0.00010035326,0.059504263,0.030014824,0.00086646446,0.0007055723,0.0011792983,0.00014622929,0.0010584675,0.0006696783,0.90566754,0.00007561363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012481051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043167584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8995324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005074256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01741144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06669527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106155822","doi":"10.3389/frma.2020.595370","title":"Intellectual Structure of Coronavirus Research: A Perspective From an Author Cocitation Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Coronavirus; Identification (biology); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Transmission (telecommunications); Bibliometrics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Medicine; Virology; Disease; Biology; Library science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Computer science; Ecology; Pathology","score_opus":0.8795814717877448,"score_gpt":0.6823888219904412,"score_spread":0.19719264979730367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106155822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7625119,0.03797553,0.05732477,0.027215162,0.00070467393,0.00045526732,0.00809915,0.0005063282,0.105207175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894744,0.0020990316,0.0058730817,0.00019657824,0.0003946687,0.00011569218,0.001194741,0.00005666493,0.0005951372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9493012,0.021130148,0.0060707685,0.0042640315,0.01642363,0.00281025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62237567,0.29102394,0.039111275,0.012768244,0.029226752,0.005494108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038446356,0.0006052652,0.0019007057,0.10613271,0.0043146634,0.021785287,0.0018077485,0.0011559554,0.0047333287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20641743,0.0003512391,0.001306529,0.15703548,0.0080709085,0.012944029,0.0074447566,0.0012981137,0.000554263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042440605,0.00015025058,0.5168284,0.0030129373,0.0015117151,0.00081568264,0.047392983,0.0032280043,0.0012948964,0.20356584,0.009486604,0.21228832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118550684,0.0003424135,0.5406873,0.002506772,0.00082205224,0.0014610958,0.074912086,0.018028356,0.0022037064,0.28451815,0.07413508,0.00026442256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074102813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057142754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96155363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008597101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008151756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20332617},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3107275649","doi":"10.1108/pmm-03-2020-0015","title":"Bibliometric analysis of a controversial paper on predatory publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Originality; Impact factor; Analytics; Library science; Value (mathematics); Bibliometrics; History; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.6294773381878578,"score_gpt":0.47341826438102474,"score_spread":0.15605907380683304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107275649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701674,0.029180858,0.011415366,0.03305419,0.0041085263,0.0008050669,0.0037799452,0.00031447178,0.14717412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97991484,0.006795287,0.0040737814,0.0015156545,0.0022456828,0.00023830158,0.0013098065,0.000089114415,0.0038176007],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.948014,0.01299564,0.006617105,0.002378908,0.029057158,0.0009371872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6493657,0.22389236,0.05060981,0.015705878,0.0577429,0.0026832994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04430075,0.0005106104,0.0010695944,0.06079674,0.003808903,0.010859399,0.0014493744,0.0015271017,0.0038289735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22621037,0.00022849752,0.0008581235,0.09412334,0.004464697,0.0052425824,0.003511887,0.0011603013,0.0009388363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055878295,0.00033999636,0.35830778,0.007861382,0.0012456159,0.0026853164,0.049567975,0.0017474203,0.0032579086,0.103766024,0.063921176,0.40674067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008969022,0.00044291193,0.5463405,0.007093478,0.0011230209,0.0038361994,0.060697183,0.0057890974,0.009245469,0.041800715,0.323287,0.00025462458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022843718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021316845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95569927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055703134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23428756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109162764","doi":"10.2312/yes19.15","title":"What Peer-review Experiences Can Offer To Early Career Scientists And To The Scientific Community","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université Laval; McGill University; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.5687515180207338,"score_gpt":0.5528710799880578,"score_spread":0.015880438032675914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109162764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039150212,0.05806687,0.0061098924,0.5407243,0.033489246,0.00081474514,0.004019973,0.0021688775,0.3154559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55200917,0.11930233,0.034211766,0.07604221,0.06547029,0.0019575274,0.0048838463,0.0028836052,0.1432393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91241676,0.04990225,0.0045185927,0.0018518934,0.025200345,0.0061101704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57754064,0.18099661,0.031327493,0.035105444,0.09620769,0.07882218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07838814,0.00070936815,0.0017048588,0.0053066798,0.0055990503,0.028111788,0.0020667915,0.006315708,0.04873808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3433313,0.00074989616,0.0013009674,0.0074630836,0.0027341505,0.041269224,0.010348272,0.0039929496,0.028572772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040463015,0.00035524048,0.0050419695,0.0032860641,0.00019455141,0.00039864346,0.01015294,0.00013575856,0.00074139936,0.007566717,0.5007729,0.4709492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012689996,0.00020452926,0.010183031,0.0024371427,0.000066334986,0.00049543666,0.019990997,0.00008541096,0.0004939162,0.010688851,0.9550563,0.00017132565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012073801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033747018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92161185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024867721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011968421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41456103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110330489","doi":"10.1111/joes.12420","title":"GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Citation impact; Web of science; Cover (algebra); Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Political science; Economics; MEDLINE; Management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8358293631396622,"score_gpt":0.6066546507714353,"score_spread":0.22917471236822684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110330489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98583615,0.0026107335,0.0008046477,0.0017138957,0.00012925985,0.000010089887,0.00048210836,0.0000121623725,0.008400929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983235,0.00034809168,0.00013131714,0.00006709799,0.0001443194,0.000007198979,0.00012984381,0.0000070038436,0.00084161386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516547,0.0019975374,0.00040595018,0.0006077342,0.0012776597,0.00054566324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140854,0.060097795,0.013244979,0.0026473843,0.0040749167,0.0058495537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071985,0.00019428483,0.00072683446,0.0069867074,0.0012893934,0.0033002805,0.0003987563,0.0010308233,0.009128622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06919708,0.00019234467,0.0005057416,0.009231433,0.0016147186,0.003259565,0.0023127098,0.0007952228,0.00074476853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000278575,0.000176207,0.9511306,0.00009484095,0.00033117994,0.00013556865,0.0040293774,0.00049988844,0.00043257306,0.0074795187,0.0020251065,0.03338646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030283965,0.00010839108,0.966501,0.00010265541,0.00011425181,0.0002869396,0.006109146,0.0010392186,0.00021800298,0.02347657,0.0019929423,0.000020694615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023466584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028280565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99301326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006905039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088912004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038069725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110679542","doi":"10.1136/bmj.m4265","title":"Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Medicine; Database","score_opus":0.9087737826657781,"score_gpt":0.6600632667911674,"score_spread":0.24871051587461068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110679542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03554251,0.022110874,0.027999127,0.34134638,0.018946283,0.003301019,0.030621463,0.013457886,0.5066745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53767526,0.031348903,0.05816913,0.074955836,0.026914235,0.005911557,0.03999176,0.009141034,0.21589229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8200303,0.072719045,0.02489672,0.007249913,0.062231857,0.012872214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32598487,0.29358163,0.09260667,0.16160303,0.09704229,0.029181378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.118391864,0.0013016638,0.0027521425,0.026014378,0.0035399813,0.02988037,0.0041587097,0.007063421,0.14166951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5445069,0.0022319166,0.002259573,0.038282692,0.0057518603,0.028816191,0.028119758,0.0048923325,0.07602998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009476532,0.00026631847,0.018345142,0.0032087232,0.00040552372,0.00058515434,0.002221984,0.00017290484,0.00090852455,0.0640878,0.5059386,0.40291157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005763405,0.00017678966,0.017507663,0.003184213,0.0001804315,0.0009005556,0.0020779415,0.0007952194,0.0014141798,0.052747205,0.92023677,0.00020254176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003913195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003038813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99293655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008468943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042900857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62612355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113126806","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00097","title":"Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Division of labour; Taxonomy (biology); General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.8339422120845222,"score_gpt":0.6137471753924978,"score_spread":0.22019503669202445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113126806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90838003,0.0030966757,0.030659553,0.0054240185,0.0006087603,0.0016247826,0.006611419,0.00012356852,0.043471146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202413,0.0007193495,0.011711269,0.00019476199,0.0001684758,0.0011004824,0.0015583701,0.000037241443,0.0024859677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548662,0.018021002,0.0060689943,0.0032813756,0.014364288,0.003398169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62500685,0.223794,0.085771106,0.016770631,0.039790314,0.008867005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056259077,0.0006422642,0.0008017321,0.028155759,0.004179544,0.007318163,0.002032688,0.00091011723,0.008009463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24749303,0.00032161313,0.0006376794,0.03253124,0.003386864,0.008720617,0.008686462,0.0013441894,0.0010382427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003222899,0.00012720564,0.8202268,0.0010047149,0.00015112298,0.00024405077,0.038838677,0.00093348173,0.0006961598,0.04212181,0.008701865,0.0866318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014420593,0.00032750986,0.72167134,0.002176329,0.00013311926,0.0005401767,0.1200398,0.006357121,0.001505403,0.07167762,0.07526622,0.00016122675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072720908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009319905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97184426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004441045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009506569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114226199","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.3","title":"Similarity indexes for scientometric research: A comparative analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Jaccard index; Similarity (geometry); Scientometrics; Computer science; Index (typography); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Statistics; Citation; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Library science; Pattern recognition (psychology); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7831704493547128,"score_gpt":0.6110607620420506,"score_spread":0.17210968731266219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114226199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13784784,0.04519512,0.71704555,0.0033871667,0.0017956542,0.0028667066,0.0048144953,0.0028521905,0.08419535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33448476,0.013430083,0.6439296,0.00015108385,0.00061067066,0.0025143928,0.0029173517,0.00067416043,0.0012878983],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8949797,0.059951775,0.009533884,0.0033179428,0.0313492,0.0008674485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8203894,0.1431303,0.00566536,0.008638631,0.020974847,0.0012014454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07453757,0.0011951363,0.0025777195,0.06205319,0.0019709265,0.009139173,0.0014300151,0.001287357,0.0055836253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1975997,0.00065700023,0.0022725437,0.10188996,0.0022312528,0.010388751,0.0043313145,0.0017556262,0.0013508578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045663473,0.00029058647,0.029764313,0.006576991,0.001726144,0.00027248394,0.0054575093,0.007467634,0.002564692,0.15892832,0.013922025,0.7725727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038119976,0.003124586,0.19032818,0.008366444,0.0028128286,0.0020005761,0.019223215,0.14899477,0.008709783,0.33044207,0.28463155,0.0009847285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013367548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012132585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9379468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043875305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39419705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115533035","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2020.101124","title":"Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7915538673463653,"score_gpt":0.540354756721656,"score_spread":0.25119911062470934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115533035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98795915,0.0016892574,0.0022035982,0.00036548942,0.000036753976,0.000028495522,0.00134053,0.000049625323,0.006327087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531376,0.00055200176,0.0017439916,0.000027649694,0.000063782005,0.00001956932,0.0011112831,0.00002406769,0.0011437966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659497,0.00073857425,0.000638815,0.000616551,0.0011769849,0.00023415346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94459873,0.03336598,0.009000393,0.0028122365,0.008634342,0.0015883213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036124433,0.00023343146,0.0004420954,0.017899942,0.0010638771,0.0048534707,0.0008072689,0.00075939443,0.0039089746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043244295,0.00017716427,0.00052741077,0.027367376,0.0004844472,0.002572994,0.0016606862,0.0006234801,0.0010039696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002924378,0.00015451829,0.88152206,0.0005476995,0.00065826566,0.0005189207,0.0048904316,0.00067216926,0.007615804,0.0044304067,0.0017298522,0.09696742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028210416,0.00013877844,0.9659827,0.00012608017,0.00030028762,0.00083494483,0.007134762,0.0048704827,0.0029532576,0.010075362,0.007510495,0.0000446983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018780008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034280869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99638754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051515177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007553541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01910466},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3116373126","doi":"10.1177/0253717620979475","title":"Do the Criteria of Our Best-Paper Awards Need Revision?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.5091905893527676,"score_gpt":0.6346134764227196,"score_spread":0.12542288706995197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116373126","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006918936,0.0026093782,0.00022101734,0.08633628,0.91003937,0.000021344742,0.000047754063,0.00005881827,0.0005969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018083827,0.0036607166,0.001152463,0.05732329,0.93229866,0.00008104879,0.000073305884,0.00009114263,0.0035110032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95023024,0.007894848,0.015327216,0.0031587442,0.021039372,0.0023496507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60567987,0.12636821,0.015032711,0.010852045,0.22104307,0.02102408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0690611,0.0024898602,0.008452678,0.0100650275,0.005839324,0.0197371,0.008962181,0.026273856,0.0076813903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31740254,0.0018324719,0.004143537,0.006319779,0.006782254,0.008927803,0.0024885505,0.040300187,0.009665847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054465338,0.000023333589,0.00020378613,0.0005323648,0.00009049218,0.000078683086,0.000036153142,0.00002672162,0.00007377985,0.0009341116,0.9824953,0.015450644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026292595,0.000057854362,0.0023151105,0.0022246,0.00041801963,0.00058585673,0.00044818997,0.00076537055,0.0004201583,0.009075961,0.98325044,0.00017555883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028851056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075875036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060590347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010996102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36523438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117899626","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000003890","title":"Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Spine Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Scopus; Citation; Proxy (statistics); Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.4871995928205806,"score_gpt":0.5255129393924708,"score_spread":0.03831334657189017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117899626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83606136,0.08118806,0.003969462,0.0014383795,0.00027736448,0.003566436,0.057800885,0.00035657163,0.015341426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073105,0.042017013,0.014137248,0.0003666454,0.00034829817,0.0055941283,0.026932154,0.000112027505,0.003182114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98469204,0.0025104769,0.005468964,0.0012635214,0.005544917,0.00052019156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93785024,0.023840612,0.019365352,0.0012401078,0.016491104,0.0012125662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010512462,0.0004768228,0.0018867314,0.097957596,0.0011423592,0.0037527264,0.0012227142,0.00068411004,0.0038419743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054141905,0.00029794965,0.0017187513,0.11593682,0.00048232672,0.0026867099,0.0015170954,0.000421415,0.0013439768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042664702,0.00022586863,0.81526333,0.023532208,0.0014879535,0.00050945376,0.0022621506,0.00038189997,0.0012333273,0.0009469425,0.006912608,0.1468177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008060911,0.0003961496,0.9564285,0.0050505754,0.001986143,0.0022248877,0.007604826,0.0011193437,0.0014863014,0.00073973055,0.022796419,0.000086447726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023347717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004455464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017371626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048677614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055595875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W311792049","doi":"10.4000/cres.2183","title":"De la république de la science à l’économie du savoir : 50 ans de politiques publiques de la recherche universitaire au Québec","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de la recherche sur l éducation et les savoirs","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.649060763002282,"score_gpt":0.5525760133520676,"score_spread":0.09648474965021436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W311792049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3755292,0.06278984,0.009838337,0.07174976,0.00077078555,0.00029978604,0.0013146029,0.00019228636,0.4775153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296478,0.012432956,0.0023799543,0.0016396374,0.00017570387,0.00011634335,0.00030430907,0.00005405388,0.053249337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192226,0.0015410888,0.00033167278,0.00078441715,0.0035318693,0.0018887011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772325,0.0064581265,0.0022949842,0.0012590092,0.010049263,0.0027061068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014240508,0.00041600325,0.00040679603,0.0073917396,0.008988218,0.009835478,0.0010029079,0.0016294089,0.007992058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018159363,0.00043073075,0.0004458438,0.009177971,0.0077260057,0.0038460812,0.0023735904,0.0027350893,0.00060365786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020053211,0.00011587952,0.05366291,0.00067980797,0.00009057349,0.00042450926,0.08208677,0.0018416179,0.0032478224,0.59723675,0.018273333,0.24213955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023682165,0.00009824197,0.29580083,0.0009704512,0.00004907592,0.00012597015,0.023508418,0.0010658454,0.0013871071,0.01405784,0.66279525,0.00011735586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91492504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.907252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105576046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11737506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7660114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119992070","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.02","title":"Chinese PhD Students’ Perceptions of Predatory Journals: A Survey Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Perception; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.6534216837444228,"score_gpt":0.595377689547528,"score_spread":0.058043994196894766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119992070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.000058728747,0.00002648266,0.0002112545,0.000005141649,0.00001161317,0.000030613584,0.0000011167632,0.00048609506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879384,0.0002279547,0.000067086854,0.00028881215,0.000020215217,0.000020692021,0.000045702032,9.261897e-7,0.0005347422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848586,0.00032748235,0.00017320798,0.00013960831,0.0006232679,0.0002507104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954797,0.0023949423,0.0028207705,0.00025666915,0.0019273701,0.003052238],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002648122,0.0001910307,0.00041843415,0.0020854601,0.0015162209,0.0016816412,0.00036751476,0.00069828227,0.0026423666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008483205,0.00023007634,0.00022959556,0.002337689,0.0008457888,0.0012215995,0.0011845456,0.00066448754,0.00038404815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100553756,0.0003719258,0.93728834,0.00015600366,0.00004193611,0.00073769945,0.041969337,0.000036503105,0.0015264475,0.00022396544,0.0011304392,0.016416883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032090764,0.00061248173,0.88689923,0.00006059939,0.00004801685,0.00071435067,0.10576213,0.00030282376,0.0005328031,0.00014713011,0.0048477803,0.00004055566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006843055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069881994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99930173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010707516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017546021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014004767},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3120412237","doi":"10.18438/eblip29736","title":"Research Productivity and Its Relationship to Library Collections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Data collection; Collection development; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Regression analysis; Library science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5682970782440521,"score_gpt":0.5375281748841486,"score_spread":0.030768903359903454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120412237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325987,0.0046744733,0.0057271533,0.0038385985,0.00012013533,0.0001761663,0.0053391065,0.00037253404,0.047153004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98702115,0.0019893434,0.0032552504,0.00016701384,0.00032929357,0.0001075814,0.0022706182,0.00008014038,0.0047795335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98233575,0.0056336676,0.002550519,0.0014402149,0.007096579,0.0009432035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7958961,0.1060585,0.056738906,0.009044496,0.02528573,0.0069763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011677106,0.00042944442,0.00051554694,0.008137038,0.000985296,0.0054896805,0.0014080368,0.00035662213,0.012922054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09708827,0.0003874246,0.0006917406,0.022106549,0.0013063847,0.0040341923,0.003172259,0.00083707407,0.0028076917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025319113,0.0003190906,0.87075156,0.0006174031,0.00041456454,0.00025238932,0.0012786535,0.0022526674,0.000779601,0.0021098729,0.0052931407,0.115678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015401756,0.00014347235,0.9811644,0.00011910622,0.0000829267,0.00034655177,0.0017405214,0.001105904,0.0010733441,0.0011185489,0.013056645,0.000033159053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069205775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051666303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99186295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031452675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046754587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06175518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120462291","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.01","title":"Book Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Australia, Part One: Understanding Institutional Pressures and the Funding Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Media studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.8039142264450041,"score_gpt":0.5148172773623888,"score_spread":0.2890969490826153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120462291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929564,0.0009829362,0.00010531838,0.0020306616,0.000010105826,0.000017143373,0.00002406394,0.0000013093203,0.0038721086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673057,0.0016189767,0.00026237717,0.00028848308,0.000012991566,0.00002695527,0.000023446406,0.0000030511553,0.0010331894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418503,0.003013776,0.00045626427,0.00032291497,0.0014230132,0.00059902377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764773,0.012302554,0.005713242,0.00044739564,0.001986538,0.0030728565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006105361,0.00013754757,0.0005905156,0.003204577,0.0041792304,0.0067299725,0.0009192965,0.00093978,0.0015427117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023375038,0.00036998728,0.000164701,0.008298109,0.0044092447,0.0050524515,0.004929099,0.0014952067,0.00018604864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025561254,0.00011216693,0.10566779,0.00042116045,0.000021488288,0.0009764856,0.8559015,0.00009818143,0.0005333836,0.0073780497,0.00082680676,0.028037444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005790479,0.00007302013,0.2957973,0.00026044797,0.00001594104,0.0002683532,0.6847281,0.00031798423,0.00025860075,0.0022330005,0.016013265,0.000028272383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052040003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08605725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007441611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010856219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1034742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121153159","doi":"10.1177/2325967120969902","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Cited Articles in Sports and Exercise Medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Sport Centre Pacific; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sports medicine; Medicine; Web of science; Scopus; Alternative medicine; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Citation; Narrative review; Sports science; Family medicine; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Physical therapy; Library science; Internal medicine; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.1919176015695751,"score_gpt":0.46394098333202166,"score_spread":0.27202338176244656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121153159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8442087,0.04446824,0.008599196,0.0023699761,0.0005161488,0.0036219833,0.067511216,0.0007871054,0.027917365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483209,0.01557196,0.013388231,0.00016432977,0.0005357576,0.0029727302,0.017327541,0.000114518654,0.0016040102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724946,0.004874323,0.008378754,0.0016422743,0.011923491,0.0006866235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83775276,0.104059294,0.02325118,0.0029436082,0.030373592,0.001619549],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016143115,0.0009836653,0.0034099096,0.19479592,0.001849144,0.005154982,0.0014684526,0.000897073,0.004413919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13695027,0.00037747613,0.0036040514,0.19735494,0.0008360433,0.0035895274,0.0024550615,0.00060965616,0.0009966514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010886136,0.0003897451,0.7254675,0.02751023,0.0064053936,0.0011554994,0.0043514613,0.0028128473,0.0023940415,0.0028644823,0.014580434,0.21097985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019926621,0.0005880967,0.9323065,0.0041303397,0.0060458207,0.0026193287,0.008233132,0.011714759,0.0016885035,0.00521368,0.0270574,0.00020318748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042742677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004069954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8052041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002989861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004326263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08537394},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3121658915","doi":"","title":"Citations or Journal Quality: Which is Rewarded More in the Academic Labor Market?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Quality (philosophy); Index (typography); Prestige; Measure (data warehouse); Actuarial science; Psychology; Impact factor; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.6430703481252008,"score_gpt":0.6208366936060491,"score_spread":0.022233654519151713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406531,0.0052776393,0.0033345448,0.020328958,0.00029750034,0.000069629736,0.00057522894,0.000108456974,0.029354911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.0004431131,0.00032142858,0.0007627913,0.00030398712,0.000013025208,0.00011241358,0.00003881384,0.0018547421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521685,0.0011663408,0.00035130756,0.00066255964,0.0017166169,0.0008863969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8809887,0.052316364,0.039123528,0.004130327,0.0065983436,0.016842738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009450085,0.00026078944,0.0016371803,0.003828826,0.0015876445,0.007895237,0.0011508568,0.0027120023,0.016720563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077148385,0.000251029,0.0008366071,0.00614797,0.003919551,0.0075609935,0.0021852893,0.0020797797,0.0020907014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010181272,0.00096510974,0.8831942,0.00041234485,0.00034049965,0.0002473771,0.001641823,0.0011770098,0.0016546464,0.026673732,0.003977976,0.078697115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017490334,0.0005607787,0.92173934,0.00013398747,0.000117188836,0.00023383235,0.0028220622,0.0026958408,0.0005607892,0.0653613,0.0055001285,0.00009984918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035139604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035638243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025094957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023464889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05593586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870221","doi":"","title":"Co-Authorship and the Output of Academic Economists","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Panel data; Positive economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.3680460502368933,"score_gpt":0.5323470082551035,"score_spread":0.1643009580182102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121870221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99297297,0.00048502834,0.0013969281,0.000380704,0.000012492657,0.0000087814715,0.0013542107,0.00002209391,0.0033666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981725,0.00016403929,0.00024351184,0.000010913724,0.000028178247,0.0000067097094,0.0007423399,0.000003977297,0.00062779326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976029,0.0010091575,0.00021536773,0.00025861632,0.00060105964,0.0003129807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88858,0.06579817,0.03212575,0.004589958,0.0052104867,0.0036955706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006007179,0.00029884695,0.00067270023,0.003511617,0.00044426284,0.0023039181,0.00047718905,0.0006303606,0.0035054083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05250355,0.00016177178,0.00033888104,0.007032087,0.0005472137,0.0016086525,0.0016622365,0.00074867054,0.0010762679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036416945,0.00011368504,0.9726336,0.000072707364,0.00022173788,0.00012041281,0.00046245023,0.006713462,0.0003503426,0.0021503947,0.000742437,0.016054636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007196022,0.00018611558,0.96422356,0.00006996934,0.00012703301,0.0002869553,0.00086718553,0.014718279,0.001346491,0.013282245,0.0047735753,0.000046735597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075467135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006730635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090688275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052660407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031769395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122247609","doi":"10.24124/2016/59114","title":"Faculty knowledge and perceptions of open access publishing at UNBC","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Library science; Publishing; Open access publishing; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.889146350400722,"score_gpt":0.7176417645412633,"score_spread":0.1715045858594587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122247609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331697,0.0011336167,0.0002474938,0.007470424,0.00007831516,0.00003465709,0.00019440542,0.000016925735,0.057654396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885334,0.0010372219,0.00019236939,0.00064136466,0.000059689104,0.000015102322,0.000074270894,0.000010275441,0.009116391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892314,0.002834441,0.0005386005,0.00036111695,0.0057806903,0.0012537385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92577463,0.025387943,0.0134694185,0.0015888875,0.012361571,0.021417594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007373189,0.00011131694,0.00031385093,0.0024664432,0.005233708,0.0076641077,0.0006860469,0.00078851,0.014327424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051667497,0.00016303275,0.00012355411,0.0043772757,0.0025506613,0.0034492563,0.0032061462,0.001199901,0.00089326216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025579034,0.000865363,0.50016814,0.00042784354,0.00004834835,0.0019880345,0.23524347,0.0007301319,0.0027718062,0.013643914,0.017655948,0.22620118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018920677,0.00031222138,0.38629222,0.0005668876,0.00002312158,0.0010467552,0.4936755,0.0006907653,0.0012125783,0.0032306537,0.11284391,0.00008648423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057229813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10272112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99931395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007588034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01232999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11379343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122374824","doi":"","title":"The (Changing) Knowledge Production Function: Evidence from the MIT Department of Biology for 1970-2000","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Knowledge production; Period (music); Face (sociological concept); Function (biology); Duration (music); Medical education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Medicine; Economic growth; Computer science; Economics; Knowledge management; Evolutionary biology; Law","score_opus":0.42434092499431086,"score_gpt":0.5259486572310224,"score_spread":0.10160773223671149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122374824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674133,0.00795065,0.0005420781,0.0036099583,0.000038244143,0.000014187466,0.011970038,0.000076247336,0.0083852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98825186,0.0028362963,0.00020734893,0.0002017341,0.0001336843,0.000019589574,0.0058717886,0.000021099626,0.0024565712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980939,0.00033085802,0.00018983675,0.0005152039,0.00051200227,0.00035817974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93160975,0.021561397,0.033389263,0.0029567115,0.005636228,0.0048466744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037032026,0.00031508916,0.00054042175,0.008301987,0.0007395251,0.0024458996,0.00086302095,0.00087712763,0.004920026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032828085,0.00026604757,0.00037879442,0.015135257,0.0010361243,0.0021555237,0.0016684375,0.00075681065,0.0018291171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029277898,0.00010527465,0.962204,0.0001844399,0.000164642,0.00018018692,0.0012282163,0.0007197044,0.00025543067,0.0014923249,0.0064839497,0.026689023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005800773,0.00002993528,0.9963595,0.00002892026,0.000030227176,0.000043361204,0.00024857762,0.00018283293,0.000110790286,0.00016406804,0.0027904855,0.0000054004686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04001992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04373337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025256022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001220833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07957399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602469","doi":"","title":"The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Political science; Business; Psychology; Advertising; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.34126194133277804,"score_gpt":0.43358358098999056,"score_spread":0.09232163965721252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96907043,0.0012039342,0.0010922804,0.0050924844,0.0001307451,0.00004302442,0.00014763232,0.000047420977,0.023172013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981852,0.0002761971,0.00021276891,0.0001286364,0.00013160043,0.000009042976,0.000025599646,0.0000068326394,0.0010240338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98348886,0.0059224376,0.0007917946,0.0006450366,0.0076601957,0.0014916259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67184937,0.14708647,0.101442404,0.0071090017,0.024201052,0.048311718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009618437,0.00018583678,0.00067906553,0.0056744367,0.0030961405,0.006369441,0.00072609435,0.0008298308,0.0077212225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109652646,0.0002185065,0.00022877089,0.0059025097,0.002800529,0.0026622405,0.003702112,0.0012959137,0.0009743236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091745675,0.0005341258,0.8330521,0.0004784289,0.00021737396,0.0013657113,0.00882342,0.0013137525,0.0022307087,0.018431792,0.008213919,0.12442121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072722374,0.00049981405,0.9508081,0.00019107168,0.00008532046,0.0008352022,0.008386842,0.0013136282,0.0014724134,0.016673878,0.019578885,0.00008206159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031654101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008336744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00446588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066192136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050867736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122668107","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewac007","title":"Markets for Scientific Attribution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Attribution; Interim; Quality (philosophy); Scientific publishing; Pareto principle; Positive economics; Publishing; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Operations management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3645518697973288,"score_gpt":0.4604129379619882,"score_spread":0.09586106816465939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122668107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3330915,0.0014561696,0.32794252,0.034853797,0.00067102787,0.0005302573,0.0006952133,0.000581442,0.30017817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805648,0.00022833885,0.008945836,0.0004138963,0.00022588274,0.00017527227,0.000056793928,0.00003858999,0.009350681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98799545,0.005888811,0.0006119652,0.0017492637,0.0023562713,0.0013982757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222191,0.047551468,0.013900451,0.0075962394,0.0053057307,0.0034270114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020414142,0.0005310473,0.00097144244,0.0016522761,0.0027577917,0.009186959,0.0021623857,0.006490237,0.029862495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08171327,0.0005833402,0.00090223213,0.001460742,0.005355886,0.010978055,0.004141716,0.0035130957,0.0026814176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000861743,0.00008912828,0.0023543169,0.0000598822,0.000025482843,0.00015713237,0.00040161336,0.007401803,0.0009580901,0.9705467,0.0027257772,0.015193981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008369499,0.00005551069,0.0015641012,0.000041214178,0.000012005533,0.00008677625,0.00036721534,0.025300458,0.0005376547,0.96428883,0.007629759,0.000032801356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010188416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007098135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040116897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003537755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107961595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123074005","doi":"10.1177/1056492612442621","title":"The Skewed Few","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Elite; Skepticism; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Accounting; Public relations; Social psychology; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.7354869257884775,"score_gpt":0.6139664475756849,"score_spread":0.12152047821279266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123074005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2521137,0.008418761,0.02814673,0.07244661,0.0031684882,0.00024046552,0.005686453,0.0009912221,0.6287875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802572,0.0063189953,0.0052370285,0.028268538,0.0036372724,0.00031621536,0.0024096796,0.00070709793,0.15053312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958982,0.00093250204,0.0002207268,0.0011065681,0.00140168,0.00044033537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789128,0.0052234367,0.003122795,0.003626733,0.0065808296,0.002533428],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041675027,0.0005020737,0.0009564985,0.004053368,0.002810021,0.0077200276,0.00089211436,0.0011246111,0.05220582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029168507,0.00028966554,0.0003376218,0.004763523,0.0034500791,0.0067906654,0.0045488295,0.002137905,0.018466996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007589379,0.00017814864,0.08446228,0.00068493345,0.00013808633,0.0015400976,0.00665616,0.00080200913,0.0036274435,0.32173732,0.18860461,0.39080998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010701195,0.00018050389,0.056009352,0.0005580597,0.00008538476,0.003028543,0.010300724,0.0011992893,0.0017620495,0.3156337,0.61103684,0.00009854708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017087075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020806992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99594665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018236325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011819882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17464584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123272100","doi":"","title":"An Updated Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ranking (information retrieval); Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4285129579472714,"score_gpt":0.5676841937327737,"score_spread":0.13917123578550228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123272100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5935911,0.016662037,0.108185835,0.014188525,0.004934532,0.0008805501,0.13105719,0.0048067165,0.1256935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7344649,0.0059942375,0.18127021,0.0010854069,0.0017608656,0.00036421578,0.04560687,0.0008570682,0.028596187],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905077,0.0013276638,0.0009095509,0.0008681007,0.005829269,0.00055770815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468101,0.006364561,0.00533885,0.004744692,0.035123106,0.001618686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060256603,0.0005267371,0.0010200619,0.033531863,0.0015771795,0.008010133,0.001160467,0.0008144128,0.007306153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046615615,0.00033172645,0.0007028329,0.036147818,0.00049952953,0.003910544,0.001411824,0.0012096541,0.0034698183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034789753,0.00033304177,0.12936236,0.0010571834,0.00034879483,0.00028160468,0.0021876548,0.009093713,0.010236019,0.029463843,0.14294769,0.67434025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010340699,0.00038197386,0.5508669,0.000350278,0.00031293667,0.00065822783,0.0014380488,0.023312403,0.007729382,0.021249132,0.39327055,0.00032680493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038526334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062149033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024184943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004513204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07660413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123390588","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.521130","title":"How Does the Government (Want to) Fund Science? Politics, Lobbying and Academic Earmarks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Government; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Quality (philosophy); Public funding; Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Public economics; Business; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.3248510872199778,"score_gpt":0.518223573959732,"score_spread":0.19337248673975416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123390588","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32285985,0.006099506,0.0036897066,0.3499083,0.0006599498,0.000049553786,0.000114614566,0.00007564327,0.31654295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822067,0.001092893,0.00031050094,0.008553754,0.0004754433,0.000023045077,0.000014462754,0.000020496833,0.0073026973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148834,0.0033451798,0.0002544329,0.0005478868,0.0018471371,0.0025169791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95081,0.02531982,0.01000779,0.0014909055,0.0049162903,0.0074551813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012973904,0.00022980473,0.0006635275,0.002846685,0.0041310284,0.01783648,0.00070714456,0.009092501,0.008727458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061120287,0.00027290944,0.00035905003,0.004148357,0.010625333,0.008716356,0.0035733907,0.0041627795,0.001595515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656508,0.00026939317,0.05510693,0.00024995094,0.0002646595,0.00036308772,0.0038002576,0.0015732909,0.0012800363,0.8407708,0.034546267,0.061409574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017259295,0.00013727855,0.04557761,0.00037074013,0.00021514349,0.00026458758,0.008990031,0.0025749956,0.001960026,0.819953,0.11967949,0.000104522696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063122883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051692217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99715334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058858017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007717011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06861341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123391130","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j6rmb","title":"Artificial Intelligence in Quebec: A Tightly Knit Network","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Politics; Investment (military); Political science; Control (management); Key (lock); Public investment; Business; Public administration; Public fund; Economics; Management; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.6661553883722251,"score_gpt":0.5758631146168364,"score_spread":0.09029227375538873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123391130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5696118,0.009133147,0.047729384,0.034273658,0.00017313073,0.00040496408,0.031137872,0.00066427374,0.3068718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426985,0.0023732441,0.011067663,0.0006418022,0.000036178506,0.00008332575,0.0062411944,0.000054915254,0.036803152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988073,0.00034782622,0.000049413142,0.00023439837,0.00030869993,0.00025230748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953389,0.0016884577,0.00052492024,0.0003752257,0.001708206,0.00036417786],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011855542,0.00026959993,0.00032874563,0.0036823906,0.0037490095,0.0054408954,0.0009235079,0.0010619209,0.011500904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008110396,0.00023450176,0.0002653813,0.010544139,0.0018738118,0.0023644867,0.0012447531,0.0005723229,0.0007729855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024248216,0.00009533072,0.19729987,0.00039075044,0.00023288447,0.0015314935,0.009522595,0.06572904,0.0015687047,0.4266277,0.10010614,0.19665307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004394305,0.00004272206,0.2376415,0.00055331,0.00014092171,0.0005052574,0.01596359,0.1527479,0.0010059408,0.07557352,0.5156421,0.00013927552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98044246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98232687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037870668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017980728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27477223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124075562","doi":"","title":"Incentives and the Effects of Publication Lags on Life Cycle Research Productivity in Economics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Construct (python library); Demographic economics; Economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3289268130147977,"score_gpt":0.5053842934740813,"score_spread":0.1764574804592836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124075562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99159473,0.001353806,0.0013977331,0.0011222134,0.0000360935,0.000030651565,0.002621376,0.000034625216,0.0018086735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741995,0.00025459394,0.0003320499,0.00006709937,0.000051265855,0.0000154672,0.0009917951,0.000007827027,0.00086001493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940485,0.0017272867,0.0007827696,0.00094373495,0.0012353112,0.0012623994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68247783,0.15115078,0.13196196,0.011090095,0.009435714,0.013883616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01770043,0.00025436198,0.00054319156,0.0039046027,0.00093635323,0.0031445187,0.00096311874,0.0009651626,0.004731413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12121452,0.00030988822,0.00057265,0.0055815475,0.0010657716,0.0015266081,0.001302833,0.00093261205,0.0008518378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028294197,0.000084126346,0.9866615,0.000046408808,0.00006938925,0.00006722039,0.0002813869,0.0020186636,0.0003464437,0.0009297199,0.0005383729,0.008673922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022095704,0.00012120541,0.9944543,0.000021557875,0.000030003706,0.000056620967,0.0002599378,0.0018988134,0.00029419383,0.0013602647,0.0014640556,0.000016925827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017550176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023040077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026974627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030284757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09360999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124238178","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2541382","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Frontier; Test (biology); Shock (circulatory); Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Computer security; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.24517672521271838,"score_gpt":0.5367705534625077,"score_spread":0.2915938282497893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124238178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94720453,0.002819568,0.0014063866,0.009049745,0.0001111086,0.000020832296,0.00038039836,0.00007378481,0.038933653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978884,0.0005262903,0.00016543793,0.00013913185,0.000113178794,0.0000038209246,0.00004534512,0.0000049445307,0.0011135188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969734,0.0009567607,0.00014576544,0.00040443047,0.00048763855,0.0010320694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196693,0.046155605,0.01935022,0.0035593377,0.0032402112,0.008025319],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042586955,0.00039778015,0.0008089631,0.0024853852,0.0009806397,0.0051387264,0.00076754723,0.0032234185,0.021177487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039560135,0.00026695317,0.000746952,0.002908087,0.0018251115,0.0070841154,0.0023617216,0.001071472,0.002537209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040250607,0.0027252822,0.686503,0.0010897715,0.001212431,0.0020409126,0.0014678426,0.009926391,0.005118762,0.06240185,0.00675178,0.21673694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006982867,0.0021684768,0.67355525,0.0005223605,0.0009869373,0.0016025747,0.007259218,0.0103592975,0.0069315494,0.2803643,0.015424713,0.00012695382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014988441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018569176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010549306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019913702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07084578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124375610","doi":"","title":"Serendipity Arrangements for Exapting Science-Based Innovations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Exaptation; Serendipity; Performativity; Extant taxon; Temporality; Epistemology; Narrative; Orchestration; Sociology; Cognitive science; Biology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5909572288283065,"score_gpt":0.6020597934960763,"score_spread":0.011102564667769821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124375610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44874936,0.0013984332,0.30201104,0.008520595,0.00016622047,0.0005514073,0.00033699875,0.0006299461,0.23763609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97975504,0.0001475957,0.01672107,0.000105830426,0.00003150581,0.00021540931,0.000049179824,0.000036137884,0.0029380904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045837,0.0047550746,0.00070367655,0.0020546594,0.0010636925,0.00096448517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698514,0.014354839,0.005724243,0.0068574864,0.0011829592,0.0020291782],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013528031,0.00051488617,0.000538799,0.0023894613,0.004540813,0.010399021,0.0015816258,0.0027398525,0.0149728395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032456677,0.0006045621,0.00071116496,0.0016375678,0.016256584,0.017298311,0.011388913,0.0022307637,0.001391725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011495638,0.000067668756,0.0053289346,0.00013933223,0.000028353908,0.00042359254,0.009534923,0.0015932566,0.002466644,0.9531839,0.00042208703,0.026696317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072588664,0.00014466466,0.0065608183,0.00017016736,0.000058590384,0.00051290035,0.010858085,0.005244539,0.0032259033,0.9391542,0.033940904,0.000056674355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025911623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044127903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031068085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022954415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07154393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124463108","doi":"","title":"Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Citation; Social impact; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.3890825930332159,"score_gpt":0.5668690280760341,"score_spread":0.1777864350428182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124463108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97325385,0.0028942393,0.00090025715,0.00040032002,0.000048899125,0.00004094002,0.005415947,0.00007017601,0.01697544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115974,0.0010375318,0.0005951996,0.000017879032,0.00009019387,0.000023269693,0.0039641825,0.000017008599,0.0030950468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971872,0.00055153074,0.0002079355,0.0002332092,0.0015185049,0.00030170823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967702,0.014158871,0.0060776393,0.0013623227,0.0073839654,0.0033150583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046447045,0.00024627324,0.0005796095,0.021966461,0.00074878254,0.0020290802,0.00058383273,0.00042569241,0.005364545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033353392,0.00009661846,0.00053384475,0.028185332,0.0004918102,0.001551076,0.0015804366,0.00040091804,0.00080061675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029870373,0.00016942153,0.8922127,0.00028245582,0.0003211152,0.00011232445,0.0012745683,0.0024789874,0.00121192,0.003991911,0.0030897534,0.094556056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008037516,0.00009967935,0.9920293,0.000027325927,0.00006154276,0.000067169516,0.0005850101,0.0014229615,0.00044882475,0.0014103672,0.0038247919,0.000014926978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008995467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020362418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019733873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024563849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124667861","doi":"10.3386/w25742","title":"In-Text Patent Citations: A User’s Guide","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; High Energy Physics; NIH Office of the Director; RIKEN; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; National Jewish Health; IFP Energies Nouvelles; National Institute on Aging; University of Washington","keywords":"Information retrieval; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.939468718043896,"score_gpt":0.7311586833684702,"score_spread":0.20831003467542575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124667861","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015313004,0.0042299978,0.048214983,0.0022931322,0.0009878704,0.001850015,0.7628996,0.08325052,0.09474258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066947793,0.00644657,0.22080885,0.003438269,0.0012232594,0.0049261074,0.5659306,0.035342805,0.15518871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771667,0.00034848775,0.00057098083,0.00035155943,0.0009000677,0.000112132424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97796905,0.011326741,0.0009920012,0.0025581496,0.0063171363,0.00083691167],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039404705,0.0022738976,0.0020647508,0.017953401,0.0009778328,0.005328772,0.0036837484,0.0016804561,0.4293516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02806979,0.0015871804,0.0014634179,0.018487955,0.00043865567,0.005403919,0.0026814982,0.001992577,0.419701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035125773,0.00004738103,0.00046962078,0.0008868347,0.000020278467,0.00006403626,0.000045604713,0.00020727696,0.0006055005,0.0013825984,0.92860603,0.06762976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057124256,0.00002354428,0.0013593743,0.00039824238,0.000020607078,0.00022811598,0.000039158396,0.00076558266,0.0009615237,0.0049374094,0.9911692,0.000040117757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034271618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007942745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092413987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028704363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8139607},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3124913960","doi":"10.1111/10.1111/1759-3441.12026","title":"The Relevance of the ‘h’ and ‘g’ Index to Economics in the Context of a Nation-wide Research Evaluation Scheme: The New Zealand Case","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Journal ranking; Order (exchange); Citation; Actuarial science; Frame (networking); Scheme (mathematics); Econometrics; Public economics; Economics; Operations research; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Information retrieval; Geography; Medicine; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.4505971787357604,"score_gpt":0.5478105346053507,"score_spread":0.09721335586959029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124913960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8121103,0.002569626,0.037356522,0.01875784,0.00019935513,0.0004960728,0.00086181925,0.000065155764,0.12758338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882366,0.0004570705,0.009236279,0.00020299971,0.000082633895,0.0001679172,0.00014700755,0.000016311196,0.0014532002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96525204,0.020249804,0.0028766287,0.001919402,0.008092934,0.0016091136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88916177,0.067539155,0.018114433,0.007681246,0.014509372,0.0029939872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046790823,0.00047738038,0.0012010393,0.009430599,0.0020360297,0.008032109,0.0011664679,0.0012766485,0.0018413969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19308801,0.00025494833,0.000617967,0.017608473,0.006454267,0.00749556,0.0035030756,0.0016886629,0.00019535274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040988313,0.00021331747,0.41533834,0.00061958417,0.00035003904,0.0010306466,0.014047893,0.0073484005,0.0010124297,0.4180354,0.0035996502,0.1379945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001366579,0.00064996124,0.70890033,0.00084464316,0.0003610183,0.0010698556,0.021472152,0.038158547,0.0016891543,0.18192393,0.044493124,0.00030066876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057581518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050633553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007976323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006661165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24745649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125065800","doi":"10.29024/joa.38","title":"Large-Scale Comparison of Authorship, Citations, and Tweets of Web of Science Authors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology","keywords":"Popularity; Social media; Altmetrics; Workflow; Similarity (geometry); Bibliometrics; Scale (ratio); Data science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5215094072867599,"score_gpt":0.5995611686223555,"score_spread":0.07805176133559566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125065800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98147476,0.00065394613,0.0010305428,0.0002657029,0.000065402695,0.00004466708,0.012418715,0.00006771751,0.00397848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97238636,0.00084259943,0.0025188955,0.00007563871,0.00028371942,0.00014993544,0.020456307,0.000059173304,0.0032273654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982222,0.0004336771,0.0002694184,0.0002602423,0.00065985584,0.00015467813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682837,0.018177332,0.006951515,0.0013471013,0.004219183,0.0010211898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020836024,0.0002134359,0.00034155365,0.012124269,0.00067385036,0.0018023023,0.0003183323,0.00057604513,0.0018219512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017329076,0.00012709961,0.00030653254,0.0146681,0.00036804294,0.0021239482,0.0013006267,0.00039324723,0.0016012287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045363329,0.00018401584,0.9009811,0.00078395836,0.00030582809,0.0003927371,0.0062228544,0.00082006113,0.0076463805,0.0018252601,0.0072260043,0.07315817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023820303,0.00019684577,0.9624114,0.0001157882,0.00013627464,0.00042726804,0.006122664,0.004315649,0.0044593634,0.001288069,0.020451726,0.00005109524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016297122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035630544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047571756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005293273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01101923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125199900","doi":"","title":"A Suggested Method for the Measurement of World-Leading Research (Illustrated with Data on Economics)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Universität Zürich","keywords":"Elite; Rest (music); Quarter (Canadian coin); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Regional science; Economics; Social science; Sociology; Geography; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7512992173318096,"score_gpt":0.6026317190154507,"score_spread":0.14866749831635895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125199900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003852175,0.00046941452,0.97793406,0.003696519,0.00088739296,0.0020792286,0.0031473432,0.0008822263,0.007051517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019190103,0.00023602304,0.96951294,0.00039025783,0.0002272521,0.0063780094,0.0011525756,0.00009113498,0.0028216757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93760335,0.03982568,0.005155291,0.00744682,0.009126393,0.0008423538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9010709,0.054201696,0.0078047616,0.012870779,0.022947928,0.0011039596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055327673,0.0022747426,0.0017797321,0.02279862,0.0026319881,0.008007027,0.0052051167,0.0050181085,0.014813224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1568273,0.00102133,0.0025718575,0.029298881,0.0049498877,0.0076999012,0.0051300745,0.0044792877,0.009134312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029817206,0.00038264442,0.029760858,0.0012921289,0.00026066162,0.00021860196,0.0030020615,0.0029296735,0.0032041464,0.5539047,0.06624662,0.33849972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004181314,0.0007264153,0.040253136,0.0010823042,0.00019686419,0.0013328128,0.0024634264,0.047602642,0.0050822087,0.600327,0.29987687,0.0006382715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034197678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003438003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003008638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049483073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29260415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125514616","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Citation Timing: A Framework and Examples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Receipt; Discounting; Citation impact; Computer science; Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Citation analysis; Subject (documents); Data science; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5239174770497576,"score_gpt":0.5767123746863733,"score_spread":0.05279489763661571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125514616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099599816,0.012934085,0.7933477,0.009752969,0.00061720924,0.00044486023,0.0008504938,0.00049116736,0.08196172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81131375,0.007681634,0.17288418,0.0004180664,0.00093889766,0.0005728774,0.00038804012,0.00021372127,0.0055888006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98574775,0.007977569,0.00089724193,0.001066046,0.0035377734,0.0007736354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87363243,0.10474409,0.007905461,0.0045104097,0.007587151,0.0016204695],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024363948,0.0012339983,0.0016387796,0.013716783,0.0027786104,0.008498384,0.0027805285,0.0034179876,0.0044116736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11907198,0.0006428393,0.0021965578,0.020652113,0.0063803685,0.010592464,0.0044425447,0.00321956,0.0007007035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006630234,0.00006406649,0.0046157865,0.00018521713,0.000059729635,0.00029094206,0.0006828407,0.028884716,0.00046986778,0.93776345,0.0014706597,0.02544637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029661222,0.00006717157,0.0025411632,0.00009980492,0.00004994948,0.00035334856,0.00028118258,0.08291419,0.0003996852,0.9051156,0.008069503,0.00007864259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072814524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029097882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98628324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046303687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020667561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1288504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125636821","doi":"","title":"The Graying of Academia Will It Reduce Scientific Productivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Political science; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.33194826975123665,"score_gpt":0.49005279121876205,"score_spread":0.1581045214675254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125636821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6816495,0.013987008,0.0035576478,0.16241772,0.0013142877,0.000051935545,0.00048113422,0.00030673857,0.13623396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764544,0.0044191577,0.0011072671,0.007992955,0.0006060667,0.000019767109,0.00007065917,0.00003038123,0.009299416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975318,0.0007765669,0.00012467089,0.00029367942,0.0005673631,0.0007059443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758897,0.007724237,0.00659469,0.0025943692,0.0023416635,0.0048552845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006897273,0.00017998612,0.0005292035,0.0016795372,0.0015749825,0.0058450294,0.0006256537,0.0020552825,0.010023776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028383425,0.00019203825,0.0005445518,0.0020709538,0.0042791613,0.004619507,0.002495772,0.0013449289,0.003583279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006218278,0.0004908409,0.22286034,0.0011395362,0.00033687675,0.0005521004,0.015255669,0.0024772738,0.0078085857,0.25853273,0.06098146,0.4289428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014604178,0.00078015635,0.33783463,0.0011523169,0.00028411503,0.0004984494,0.015894253,0.0013907715,0.0057215993,0.28685793,0.3493364,0.000103467624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00261226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00470395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99832046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027717473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048935004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03647667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125676971","doi":"10.1177/23780231211006977","title":"The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; Santa Clara University","keywords":"Productivity; Pandemic; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Demographic economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.77604919358679,"score_gpt":0.6606782569336781,"score_spread":0.11537093665311193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125676971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76314396,0.009177932,0.0049775355,0.11172435,0.0020465641,0.00010641724,0.002997714,0.00013458173,0.10569095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990086,0.0014838404,0.00070155127,0.0037109726,0.00045340176,0.000038087248,0.00029563802,0.000050793868,0.0031796207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928027,0.0030879274,0.00036924062,0.0009483064,0.0014826052,0.0013092058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531866,0.026638707,0.01028081,0.0027154647,0.0035507292,0.0036276788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010208944,0.00033122653,0.00046266578,0.0023733026,0.0035529174,0.00597997,0.0010742453,0.001500227,0.014826361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049913537,0.00020258575,0.0006896053,0.0039117844,0.0044358093,0.0062640253,0.006415786,0.0026737626,0.001431062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001063014,0.0002812812,0.58106977,0.00061910873,0.000288992,0.0014925516,0.04670384,0.0014671104,0.0015509244,0.10387327,0.049245786,0.21234438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074100644,0.0005908272,0.64661026,0.0013021108,0.00016794584,0.0011147204,0.12033023,0.0019681398,0.0020452498,0.086531304,0.13906804,0.00019710351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008670615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012978918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003590819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004310812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05399072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126039589","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18201071","title":"Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Citation analysis; Open science; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.6260760814279249,"score_gpt":0.6279675711060868,"score_spread":0.001891489678161884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126039589","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011262316,0.002433745,0.0023366136,0.0049820472,0.01781123,0.00043477007,0.52030486,0.01758229,0.4228522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04566832,0.0027392877,0.009610835,0.0006660396,0.0074158134,0.00045978234,0.32735577,0.006456835,0.5996273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794096,0.000095738564,0.00015048479,0.00022083451,0.0012707022,0.00032130556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907286,0.0011717229,0.00076325855,0.0014941682,0.0050800797,0.002417859],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024388037,0.0013922083,0.0021407593,0.024239382,0.0019785913,0.008211476,0.0011893524,0.0014506951,0.6668035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016424218,0.0005731117,0.0014904389,0.021339819,0.00033225978,0.004221487,0.0035330683,0.0016041892,0.35008624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023632303,0.000063214226,0.0008865821,0.000695788,0.00004465084,0.000074886055,0.00004327204,0.000053470285,0.0012874635,0.0020427133,0.93617415,0.05839753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001767477,0.00011451711,0.024131717,0.00029405789,0.00009932165,0.00022931649,0.00013572526,0.00038425598,0.0023524347,0.0029584207,0.9690493,0.000074229174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033025667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005879293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011796111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002037245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47526437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126141302","doi":"","title":"Neophilia Ranking of Scientific Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Ranking (information retrieval); Publication; Publishing; Journal ranking; Citation; Work (physics); Index (typography); Computer science; Reputation; Impact factor; Focus (optics); Data science; Political science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.5495091212506126,"score_gpt":0.5591364342025403,"score_spread":0.009627312951927758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126141302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85142833,0.0015797502,0.09293389,0.0029420783,0.0002996051,0.00035049557,0.0023495103,0.0006723463,0.047443956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880235,0.00020539963,0.009158312,0.000106324216,0.000116191106,0.000078965386,0.00042925533,0.00002963041,0.001852422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909623,0.0042039347,0.00066576985,0.0009879624,0.0024620278,0.0007179738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91534644,0.053305645,0.013489358,0.00554032,0.009740624,0.0025776518],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007482769,0.000440605,0.0013675777,0.013586617,0.0018271732,0.006754296,0.0008333629,0.0010018655,0.007859138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060216904,0.00027573697,0.00081952434,0.009224999,0.0015795864,0.0040903417,0.0020308422,0.00078568986,0.0012092746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015494144,0.00041444477,0.25191236,0.0013631148,0.0010376986,0.00087312417,0.0025130815,0.0626821,0.0065743625,0.38002282,0.027321465,0.26373598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032989736,0.0005310526,0.17361358,0.00023922446,0.0004866956,0.00066511286,0.0023135045,0.34591675,0.0062696636,0.4489138,0.020463286,0.00025736794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018724022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018645782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98641336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003080053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001975886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039573133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128633531","doi":"","title":"ORCID AND OTHER ACADEMIC SOCIAL ACCOUNTS OF A CANADIAN ECONOMIST PROMINENT IN THE MEDIA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecoforum Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Library science; Scopus; Freedom of information; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6177065743930763,"score_gpt":0.5448986655532655,"score_spread":0.07280790883981081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128633531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35023057,0.004056658,0.0020263907,0.035223,0.0013298689,0.00035645845,0.031063015,0.0005458921,0.57516813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80168605,0.0033125163,0.0023306906,0.0026462853,0.00042383323,0.00013140308,0.005539163,0.00019111432,0.1837389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946519,0.0006877354,0.00018941713,0.00033921632,0.00316329,0.0009684547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975807,0.0054937107,0.0034793862,0.0015347718,0.009719915,0.0039652064],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038062965,0.00046496105,0.00036095103,0.019692665,0.016727213,0.008371871,0.0013677654,0.0016340106,0.016956378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02137536,0.00024242324,0.00023571943,0.030469637,0.0028072097,0.0028020486,0.002783334,0.0011720675,0.0021916993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026850906,0.00009785569,0.08867075,0.00068861217,0.00006995546,0.004435962,0.1938217,0.00040649375,0.0023372632,0.1107832,0.4650747,0.13334498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005519521,0.0000121060675,0.049314473,0.00020309309,0.000026482207,0.00046156204,0.07151405,0.00063413323,0.00055876526,0.0015123611,0.87562454,0.00013283374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84863734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9172548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98030734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03657516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03162301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3045081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128850065","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.018","title":"The impact of gender on scientific writing: An observational study of grant proposals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; English language; Curriculum; Tone (literature); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.9770931054240265,"score_gpt":0.7804160686956477,"score_spread":0.19667703672837877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128850065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99754566,0.0006233197,0.00029343713,0.00025408604,0.000026982354,0.00009162926,0.000352395,0.0000051074153,0.0008073109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987571,0.0002776625,0.00029328908,0.000070153415,0.00003968517,0.00012627157,0.00017004243,0.0000057361026,0.00026000134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839459,0.007346884,0.0031937766,0.001051259,0.0034455326,0.0010167399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935656,0.03800644,0.05371398,0.0040432457,0.005665981,0.005004691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015704896,0.00025891597,0.00072157383,0.0040786047,0.0012239331,0.0016383132,0.0005790358,0.0006419222,0.0026074129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09568753,0.00026797983,0.0006727884,0.005450929,0.0012058154,0.001731336,0.0017618915,0.00064497243,0.00065320113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024975176,0.00016564419,0.9840553,0.00019691944,0.000056133973,0.00018267405,0.005942824,0.000023279745,0.00024237357,0.00014351108,0.00038548632,0.008356065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031290303,0.000739788,0.9823072,0.00022297062,0.00007226071,0.000884409,0.012501038,0.0001158579,0.00025759195,0.0003078383,0.002534761,0.000025014988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011062225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014838455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007675776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025239703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08305645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129446086","doi":"10.1108/lhtn-11-2020-0106","title":"ORCID education: a departmental approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Promotion (chess); Library science; Computer science; Political science; History","score_opus":0.4620305300491584,"score_gpt":0.5378759009917609,"score_spread":0.07584537094260246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129446086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15536746,0.0020303037,0.06602241,0.17633781,0.005476866,0.003878078,0.0008183902,0.0032188313,0.5868498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75306666,0.0010401187,0.056072604,0.038162872,0.0009667108,0.002043424,0.0005336964,0.0007092012,0.14740478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629739,0.019860283,0.0015846613,0.003174963,0.006973514,0.00543276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.932873,0.013470875,0.0038504465,0.0060784933,0.014924186,0.028802933],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029676784,0.00044145403,0.0004209085,0.0042667533,0.015520382,0.015834412,0.0060624736,0.002945828,0.050765283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03921787,0.000586241,0.000607836,0.0060985535,0.0072688377,0.007378422,0.02291996,0.006248675,0.007604081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026311263,0.0029059243,0.036976904,0.001006619,0.00005211757,0.0015223654,0.03231155,0.0006885861,0.002138087,0.18719685,0.2072136,0.52772427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011312894,0.0005156505,0.013449983,0.0006619161,0.000032894215,0.0008005283,0.06354146,0.001151624,0.0016105651,0.026125373,0.89190584,0.00009104098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009054913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023877379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0286224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07147373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20767105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131617483","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqaa063","title":"Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public relations; Digital scholarship; Political science; Openness to experience; Open science; Stakeholder; Engaged scholarship; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Library science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.8969408243494004,"score_gpt":0.6130882244822331,"score_spread":0.28385259986716727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131617483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015487896,0.94424814,0.00054156594,0.03131887,0.0010451563,0.000080596066,0.00008778708,0.000019401974,0.0071706297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06424788,0.9281964,0.001195179,0.0045292145,0.00027218054,0.000112291615,0.00006715042,0.000022193582,0.001357423],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893385,0.0037088108,0.001902981,0.0007254024,0.0036204665,0.000703918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493754,0.0316495,0.004068577,0.00058922224,0.010763028,0.0035542173],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01583716,0.00038650603,0.0012660609,0.007638052,0.0037914538,0.0073414044,0.001454959,0.0026848733,0.0029589268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039283592,0.0007100462,0.00082302367,0.010916806,0.0035988581,0.006901776,0.0052651633,0.0036192946,0.00036410778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000692531,0.00017327753,0.009559794,0.07593889,0.0001556135,0.0014657079,0.05554164,0.00039075888,0.00058959966,0.033984262,0.029324533,0.7928067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015668214,0.00021562037,0.043264322,0.1489069,0.00025686854,0.0021361224,0.061448354,0.00041340783,0.0003453295,0.009528105,0.7333255,0.00014383331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05051049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091829985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99854505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010435604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0534447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10043299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133161949","doi":"10.3390/women1010006","title":"Women—An Open Access Journal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.8415382076672177,"score_gpt":0.6893801013899552,"score_spread":0.15215810627726245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133161949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010794749,0.06607747,0.0016327963,0.51865995,0.16066426,0.00038521754,0.0043484336,0.00093433907,0.23650274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15752079,0.11626745,0.005945365,0.12466673,0.16090693,0.00050186197,0.003175152,0.0014197294,0.42959607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920838,0.002406522,0.00077101355,0.000634357,0.003402754,0.0007016136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95655036,0.013129018,0.0043899333,0.0035848762,0.011454752,0.01089115],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00759518,0.0007046863,0.0011441977,0.004099472,0.004033993,0.018534794,0.00092341285,0.003296606,0.06969334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048979063,0.0004393868,0.00036028904,0.0072944895,0.0042108567,0.006599043,0.0033809415,0.0028413434,0.020803684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006308977,0.00008203291,0.0036457817,0.0008082328,0.00005271589,0.00026429025,0.0005714918,0.00001946335,0.0005315773,0.01281229,0.87476957,0.10637954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008405592,0.000026877946,0.0023082977,0.00046143,0.000013812049,0.00022655798,0.00082868425,0.00002253391,0.00011917972,0.006285492,0.9896889,0.00000992731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007250344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022125589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013078904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133687705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23314744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133906725","doi":"10.1111/jdv.17196","title":"Global publication productivity in dermatology: a bibliometric description of the past and estimation of the future","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Atopic dermatitis; Scopus; Dermatology; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.18854739366658751,"score_gpt":0.4408241137055947,"score_spread":0.2522767200390072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133906725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4462183,0.23013884,0.018952599,0.009483824,0.0010920843,0.0011518715,0.22546925,0.0018299589,0.06566325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564267,0.06961936,0.01735134,0.00030166173,0.001311556,0.0010859414,0.051061973,0.00029668087,0.0025447179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701937,0.0059699025,0.0069361706,0.0024543179,0.013586561,0.000859384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88009024,0.06579805,0.027683316,0.0063837017,0.018369192,0.0016755495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02261675,0.00095074804,0.0023228053,0.1438906,0.0007930449,0.007943549,0.0012032005,0.00069904036,0.004153306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092689484,0.0003545504,0.0033362554,0.26954278,0.0014430996,0.0069252197,0.003343091,0.0008637065,0.0012954576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045045052,0.00008917772,0.6260672,0.023929507,0.006788931,0.00048123996,0.004131074,0.005414683,0.00094651035,0.011168359,0.025059434,0.2954734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008861774,0.00023634033,0.8506201,0.0054475926,0.0028314372,0.0017867403,0.0048068026,0.006609515,0.0008780104,0.014350201,0.112123385,0.00022106091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003016964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97738326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025325504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030470614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11961019},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3134658860","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v14i1.637","title":"Evaluating, Improving, and Appreciating Peer Review at IJTMB","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Ask price; Technical peer review; Publishing; Criticism; Psychology; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Preprint; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7675540154809658,"score_gpt":0.7239451200050988,"score_spread":0.04360889547586699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134658860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020917412,0.028994216,0.15243948,0.34439263,0.2532749,0.009685679,0.002146377,0.021496525,0.16665284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16826089,0.045121767,0.34312662,0.04539987,0.11969167,0.0076034437,0.0029448674,0.013061743,0.25478914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7133779,0.13075484,0.032360557,0.009036307,0.10679808,0.0076723285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36307904,0.12749791,0.071456246,0.061920885,0.31104243,0.06500356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1612762,0.001575404,0.002517763,0.00831518,0.0068844617,0.037246283,0.0041661886,0.005841827,0.043679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5186764,0.0015251959,0.0014426255,0.0068384223,0.0077242814,0.017862797,0.01050604,0.01022991,0.07427739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020866499,0.00017282857,0.0026319884,0.0016347835,0.000060514485,0.0003032043,0.0031824014,0.00018169718,0.00322846,0.009171533,0.66387296,0.31535095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048301736,0.00019775174,0.0049136523,0.0014937702,0.000036034562,0.00061811355,0.0016090103,0.00075169664,0.0022992047,0.0086683575,0.979158,0.00020610735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017424254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004613313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8387238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008306103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05857355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8529203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134806533","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/7t9gf","title":"Branding Scholarly Journals: Transmuting Symbolic Capital into Economic Capital","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Safe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Symbolic capital; Capital (architecture); Brand names; Political science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Social science; History","score_opus":0.5349581032269551,"score_gpt":0.5645651400440147,"score_spread":0.029607036817059562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134806533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7454333,0.0021552027,0.12523648,0.0052187527,0.00015739442,0.00019520098,0.00024226961,0.00015119983,0.12121021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98954356,0.0005475334,0.0053572347,0.00011283623,0.0000805866,0.000033213266,0.00003198905,0.000012649242,0.004280351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880934,0.0003379904,0.000045500172,0.00016957326,0.00034184885,0.00029579684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385035,0.0030390085,0.0014795626,0.00070003525,0.00043428433,0.00049668795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016021972,0.00047721842,0.0003748392,0.0019210104,0.0011783892,0.0066410466,0.0009462517,0.0014072225,0.006084877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008122435,0.00023163737,0.00043034923,0.002677273,0.00556072,0.0065164124,0.002537192,0.0011245277,0.00060845446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014749425,0.0003291241,0.022031248,0.0002598615,0.000098901124,0.0007329374,0.0026517706,0.018844994,0.004103443,0.8870143,0.001463191,0.0623227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011099403,0.0003759826,0.03963418,0.00025329273,0.00021410413,0.00078714767,0.005423617,0.06960129,0.007800577,0.84735066,0.028300049,0.00014804419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026014403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001681554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028791104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013899992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02088952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135332239","doi":"10.51845/34s.1.18","title":"Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Questions","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Currency; Incentive; Higher education; Analytics; Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Economics; Data science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6089707887367589,"score_gpt":0.6080250362803373,"score_spread":0.0009457524564215891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135332239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06874332,0.020381486,0.23113427,0.30619952,0.004955904,0.0002764429,0.000913704,0.0009833642,0.36641204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89671516,0.0035655356,0.03304989,0.010386776,0.002459829,0.0002802316,0.00021269466,0.00065013906,0.052679855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553975,0.02414614,0.0021728177,0.0037395512,0.012917319,0.0016266082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8123672,0.11302112,0.013677204,0.026890704,0.026102968,0.007940709],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0463916,0.0010905701,0.0021461484,0.006195799,0.0043546227,0.02438769,0.003174487,0.005715088,0.015620258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24654469,0.00085718575,0.0010089254,0.0072759464,0.026999585,0.0340681,0.011887384,0.007992863,0.0038293535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005032539,0.00002310474,0.001044387,0.00005913087,0.000033246528,0.0000280789,0.0004747157,0.0011292608,0.00009266598,0.96071666,0.008196398,0.028151987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001818061,0.000023961791,0.00040112648,0.00006899499,0.000008861155,0.000040241815,0.00021102019,0.0033098194,0.00012011121,0.9803437,0.015430133,0.000023806131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005255378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037158837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008137114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073790685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24534512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136394449","doi":"10.3389/frma.2021.655350","title":"What Constitutes Authorship in the Social Sciences?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Globe; Promotion (chess); Task (project management); Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.8782653950798424,"score_gpt":0.6831072878673955,"score_spread":0.19515810721244686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136394449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46125427,0.020150002,0.10994012,0.1244126,0.0033149673,0.0004742007,0.0009359132,0.00044955115,0.2790684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98644954,0.0017256029,0.007753603,0.0010480095,0.00058351655,0.00012772629,0.00012892993,0.00005825032,0.0021248094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90180653,0.06618116,0.006965125,0.0049068253,0.01726384,0.0028765302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5803417,0.31268656,0.037482843,0.023494367,0.033431064,0.01256348],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051486235,0.0005765705,0.001531288,0.012809462,0.007481866,0.020927073,0.0014814184,0.0030850293,0.0070947353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27590355,0.00043318074,0.0007522632,0.022226853,0.016866906,0.02173336,0.006819258,0.002023736,0.001487213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021402363,0.00018428615,0.19203934,0.0013270559,0.00018775204,0.00041754238,0.049498707,0.00097110355,0.00055727,0.4960135,0.009820333,0.24876907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041528383,0.00009901645,0.05636888,0.0012546114,0.0000733622,0.00059722026,0.037817523,0.0024152086,0.00058503036,0.8556455,0.044999465,0.00010268331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030823292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035337096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006073433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008225596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2722885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136742816","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226","title":"The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Intellectual property; General partnership; Open innovation; Economics; Open science; Knowledge creation; Public economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Management; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.8515611675883188,"score_gpt":0.720693447368452,"score_spread":0.1308677202198668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136742816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15395771,0.068255894,0.043067854,0.48914433,0.00068097963,0.00007687133,0.00024807482,0.00024207852,0.24432625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568396,0.017436836,0.01033531,0.0058085164,0.0010540924,0.00011927233,0.0000644706,0.00007978759,0.008262068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880486,0.0052286955,0.0005697409,0.0015399923,0.0033178022,0.0012951603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947058,0.03742595,0.004244613,0.0045893523,0.0042805015,0.0024014849],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02401341,0.0003357236,0.0012773502,0.0039081317,0.0040717307,0.015280093,0.0012512518,0.006484192,0.0064413333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050356016,0.00059094443,0.00072884734,0.0039763586,0.036397364,0.0312771,0.0072641564,0.006958301,0.00097220065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049282044,0.000036544592,0.0019982273,0.00013785606,0.000015067906,0.000066851346,0.000980839,0.0007405308,0.00014341065,0.97081506,0.0014837312,0.02353254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031862528,0.00004453151,0.0041272086,0.0003109893,0.000007095362,0.000102950755,0.0010676683,0.0015032719,0.00023350008,0.9462921,0.046254057,0.000024672343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034285644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025773507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010427501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008309988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12699658},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3138654300","doi":"","title":"Stagnation and Scientific Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Novelty; Productivity; Economics; Scientific progress; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.41562190960107603,"score_gpt":0.5245709629799813,"score_spread":0.10894905337890526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138654300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6437913,0.014130891,0.07242308,0.06587911,0.00073393347,0.00045882567,0.0013712068,0.0006598413,0.20055187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881038,0.0014304946,0.0038833492,0.0010292132,0.00027498807,0.00016102966,0.0001308645,0.000041502022,0.0049447934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778086,0.010384976,0.0014888975,0.0021510185,0.005444249,0.0027223101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87606484,0.057516236,0.03179272,0.0067423335,0.015292114,0.012591797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030633053,0.00056955114,0.0017306859,0.005674138,0.0032224306,0.010485731,0.0012827324,0.0038270226,0.008150719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13063909,0.0005194437,0.00080778566,0.007207676,0.0071959337,0.010016625,0.0052879187,0.0026131112,0.001295227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000460434,0.00024141083,0.08094899,0.0005119768,0.00020559222,0.00034259964,0.0031010034,0.016034659,0.0008747578,0.8059882,0.00990423,0.08138612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016274533,0.0003415046,0.032788344,0.00028691883,0.0000768907,0.00021256538,0.0010446967,0.014137611,0.0005429515,0.91038173,0.03991468,0.00010928872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029132115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019358442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100255655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008837581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16200495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138751991","doi":"10.7202/1075704ar","title":"Un aperçu de la recherche à Bibliothèque et Archives Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"National Science Board; York University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Council Canada; University at Albany; University of Toronto; Strong; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Windsor; National Science Foundation; University of Washington; McGill University; Arizona State University; Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology; Yale University; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; University of British Columbia; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.6317529281274052,"score_gpt":0.5616780748897119,"score_spread":0.07007485323769336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138751991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08474767,0.14179774,0.0071569765,0.3972678,0.009689979,0.0004628486,0.013058483,0.00094744936,0.34487113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5730649,0.15596244,0.01375057,0.045183174,0.005213,0.00049362355,0.0066206655,0.001084963,0.19862665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94250125,0.010604923,0.002599314,0.0035653214,0.036528543,0.004200645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85229987,0.04262413,0.008018382,0.0075703603,0.07855202,0.010935263],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022130866,0.0006455554,0.0011528818,0.017759848,0.015574163,0.021263452,0.0019386376,0.0032700687,0.027715813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08055909,0.00070240936,0.0009671329,0.049351245,0.009314398,0.0064658877,0.005936495,0.0041971966,0.0034137245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032673823,0.00008971498,0.035727333,0.0041354303,0.00023378065,0.0010267464,0.029495118,0.00067602633,0.0027596185,0.19372118,0.36677867,0.3650297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001576708,0.00002417721,0.027797723,0.0015072598,0.0000589454,0.00023288182,0.011325101,0.0002078219,0.001037818,0.004601304,0.9531247,0.000066491055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8674849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89623094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98224014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09125503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2528792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6621047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138838551","doi":"10.1177/0003122421996323","title":"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expansive; Citation; Bridging (networking); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Publishing","score_opus":0.650926118561627,"score_gpt":0.6181973579764589,"score_spread":0.03272876058516805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138838551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6030156,0.020427767,0.20397621,0.049518216,0.001468838,0.0010405232,0.0011840985,0.0013991544,0.11796958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97038805,0.0020959051,0.019662082,0.0015942485,0.0008030445,0.0005519629,0.00033860645,0.00035818477,0.004207873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85754824,0.07118143,0.0100420015,0.01269066,0.044694655,0.0038429212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3744858,0.4362698,0.07810319,0.081380405,0.02681571,0.002945172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0782296,0.00082834595,0.0013935633,0.014408065,0.007703721,0.019585093,0.0034143508,0.0026572023,0.005066371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39691696,0.0010476835,0.0012217509,0.0132708335,0.02458689,0.017321875,0.014362597,0.0037923832,0.0014849154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009461306,0.0002169065,0.075432785,0.002805432,0.00074314966,0.0017227485,0.08142807,0.0048036156,0.010811342,0.49644202,0.012516349,0.3121315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002237421,0.00034101115,0.065782666,0.0015977422,0.00045222972,0.002861102,0.022618009,0.010658748,0.012477702,0.7183731,0.16434896,0.000264989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015555937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001636328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98559195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006123135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062904563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41372263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139314136","doi":"10.1111/hir.12367","title":"Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Health Information & Libraries Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Peer review; Citation; Inclusion (mineral); Grey literature; Systematic review; Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.7157679003052918,"score_gpt":0.621136672412235,"score_spread":0.09463122789305678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139314136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044688834,0.9324036,0.023816887,0.018436993,0.003362737,0.0077966433,0.0012937988,0.00046024704,0.00796016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052583337,0.8283014,0.09059142,0.00443934,0.0017574488,0.018179834,0.002053608,0.00042559358,0.0016679077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.48233303,0.3049823,0.13044354,0.01534669,0.06312338,0.0037710955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21054123,0.3819654,0.09637894,0.029283408,0.27560946,0.0062215575],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42080662,0.0023719966,0.005455791,0.07362965,0.0038941214,0.01627272,0.0063621625,0.00537448,0.0043609077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58627385,0.0029415356,0.004126227,0.058993157,0.006735378,0.019508118,0.011904938,0.004153953,0.0023434234],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028963783,0.00008765565,0.0040643094,0.23565482,0.0013612498,0.0002626331,0.009988713,0.00048430418,0.0009462803,0.00609825,0.020075517,0.7206866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019469368,0.0004046618,0.011904611,0.595152,0.0023485941,0.00091803493,0.005447161,0.00083217147,0.0015896643,0.0057660947,0.3751932,0.00024908115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008082639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014595466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017979583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07970241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71424854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142823547","doi":"","title":"Research guides: ROP299Y/399Y - Reviewing the University of Toronto’s Climate Change Plan to Increase Campus Participation in Addressing Climate Change: Citation Management Tools","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Citation; Plan (archaeology); Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Library science; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.8311221298416661,"score_gpt":0.6014166377792378,"score_spread":0.2297054920624283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142823547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013662669,0.0019815166,0.0022694964,0.01757576,0.0054847808,0.0019151944,0.07343067,0.008053288,0.887923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028068996,0.0011654097,0.0019048835,0.00090338406,0.00062241365,0.0005520262,0.015093444,0.0020271968,0.9749244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198943,0.0010794863,0.00073430245,0.00087541284,0.0047326493,0.0005886098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89695275,0.009830948,0.0038153122,0.0046847113,0.0726621,0.012054167],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008328989,0.0017587151,0.0018058951,0.012054978,0.0041616415,0.009343355,0.0022613143,0.0040324875,0.6937943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05499883,0.00120685,0.00058939867,0.017786995,0.0019511405,0.003072227,0.003157917,0.0020653256,0.5358101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015375312,0.0000073820534,0.0001277609,0.00018261082,0.0000015698124,0.00000982662,0.00007267013,0.000022631477,0.000062400744,0.0005974351,0.97967964,0.019220704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027462806,0.000015663873,0.0026290894,0.00027767895,0.0000063423217,0.000019145305,0.00024072052,0.00012494111,0.00017575717,0.00042772279,0.9960444,0.000011188679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31104672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59747535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015761258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061795764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61847246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145008074","doi":"10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(1).22-38","title":"New Media for Science: Key Features of Platforms with Open Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Scope (computer science); Key (lock); Computer science; Open science; Publishing; Process (computing); Peer review; Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.45154714619089453,"score_gpt":0.6087514323964822,"score_spread":0.15720428620558768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145008074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09355972,0.020704253,0.30530074,0.0477356,0.008685192,0.0051189153,0.0022402906,0.00651159,0.51014376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636281,0.008818797,0.28672156,0.0029382594,0.011699689,0.0046144575,0.001102152,0.0020917885,0.04573233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626174,0.016032493,0.0025137884,0.0027253898,0.0145598715,0.001551079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8529591,0.078695066,0.019531893,0.026929382,0.015336549,0.006547895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023984494,0.0009523546,0.0008883317,0.008527809,0.0042465143,0.024578333,0.0028507418,0.0026999114,0.019248333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1294653,0.0009162098,0.0012705505,0.011683844,0.005039075,0.027419375,0.013397356,0.0031866385,0.006623646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004455151,0.0003724037,0.015055596,0.002679231,0.00018573373,0.0011349199,0.011387857,0.0014061152,0.0041494314,0.41750988,0.049229167,0.49644414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013759256,0.00032282725,0.018666316,0.0016282084,0.00022692904,0.0027949617,0.006174613,0.0056323307,0.0032989073,0.2739711,0.68684036,0.00030571752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007703901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010808896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002724537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006238016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12684363},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3145570743","doi":"10.1107/s2053273314081832","title":"The State of the Union","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Transformational leadership; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.13148298212943052,"score_gpt":0.44971142423106764,"score_spread":0.31822844210163714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145570743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030863872,0.1087662,0.0038255916,0.23512006,0.00888948,0.00004786511,0.0026084313,0.00047964792,0.60939884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63228554,0.09327623,0.006968727,0.05123961,0.0064131985,0.00019294533,0.0045130015,0.0005596772,0.20455112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908042,0.0017579194,0.0006612419,0.0016196389,0.0031917486,0.0019653058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854316,0.0045220843,0.0015940986,0.0018958556,0.0034678024,0.0030885262],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00839252,0.0002684749,0.00085215,0.0029700624,0.0043208892,0.016427075,0.0014861596,0.0036280781,0.04591865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022780929,0.00028446477,0.0004934768,0.008920877,0.0041966885,0.00719357,0.0038440756,0.0040406096,0.008581903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015402003,0.00006712575,0.005089489,0.00042818856,0.00003824791,0.00013615003,0.0016518518,0.00022566093,0.00016686636,0.5491577,0.17196465,0.2709201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009352749,0.000027083526,0.0039644977,0.00074997667,0.0000138724645,0.000062260064,0.0012038242,0.0001296519,0.00011438303,0.03226298,0.9614426,0.000019523835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009674057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068925126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99702996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045554237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011885087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15361315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147687620","doi":"","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Exploit; Frontier; Shock (circulatory); Test (biology); Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Biology; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.41144535761455703,"score_gpt":0.5645683352818716,"score_spread":0.15312297766731453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147687620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787279,0.0007076188,0.0009839335,0.0024357513,0.000029484312,0.000010761237,0.00033409926,0.000043052005,0.016727354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987197,0.0001954859,0.00011562236,0.00006696618,0.000057388508,0.0000033118101,0.00006881908,0.000004311928,0.0007685208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00042454997,0.000111149806,0.00033452714,0.00031115205,0.0006671336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90807843,0.042981885,0.0335566,0.0045886994,0.002409371,0.00838501],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032131835,0.00026640575,0.0006796521,0.002312161,0.0006085963,0.0035381233,0.0005539868,0.0019295159,0.014874706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041664857,0.0002538152,0.00043804455,0.0024128638,0.0012966403,0.0037877474,0.0022995754,0.0007520951,0.0018195256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014862886,0.0010414128,0.868105,0.0003767919,0.00058321335,0.0011030354,0.001276472,0.010745897,0.0026154104,0.029302342,0.003066605,0.08029751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030248583,0.0010226769,0.89016473,0.00014651874,0.00037235464,0.0007533375,0.0029506707,0.0070184837,0.0024050218,0.0854857,0.009312525,0.0000654232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017488002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017192357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086185854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010404226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04976082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152872807","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scab030","title":"The Study of Network Effects on Research Impact in Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Robert Bosch Stiftung","keywords":"Centrality; Position (finance); Rest (music); Political science; Data science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.6751627552709869,"score_gpt":0.6534698576863873,"score_spread":0.02169289758459958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152872807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987501,0.0010276323,0.002097698,0.0006342366,0.000022444376,0.000014999879,0.00050420564,0.000017340892,0.008180308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940145,0.00020777411,0.0001759999,0.000007076317,0.000012484804,0.000005065963,0.000057645357,0.0000028030317,0.0001297356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975768,0.0013398147,0.000111031375,0.0002695582,0.00032878973,0.00037398047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93743885,0.04710379,0.010679333,0.0011348121,0.0020665666,0.0015766022],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036634947,0.0003369144,0.00045439755,0.0070714247,0.0011188575,0.0024751038,0.00035186435,0.0004631198,0.0052208714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046562325,0.00014801082,0.00035123245,0.012779161,0.0014988034,0.0035384058,0.002146277,0.0005498064,0.000305646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037150248,0.00009126027,0.92514175,0.00031540677,0.0004771952,0.0005084262,0.0036854378,0.016023804,0.0011212061,0.017054819,0.001015409,0.0341938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223575,0.00010425325,0.95155907,0.00023728555,0.00028088235,0.00030162078,0.005489849,0.020918963,0.0010203214,0.013978336,0.006040798,0.000036322486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079404805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006360496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99292856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016665244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008806499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019374669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153675158","doi":"10.1139/facets-2020-0040","title":"Are we paying-to-play? A quantitative assessment of Canadian open access research in ecology and evolution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Index (typography); Open access publishing; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Ecology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.9069796821772832,"score_gpt":0.7299915060222031,"score_spread":0.1769881761550801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153675158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7693754,0.006987653,0.0064721634,0.035447866,0.00036150846,0.0004199689,0.0066852677,0.00013608354,0.17411414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918928,0.0011957329,0.0021357539,0.00052026653,0.00004163801,0.00005773956,0.00045190114,0.000033060518,0.0036711565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701304,0.0045952755,0.0012907848,0.0018400279,0.019427342,0.0027162384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9061519,0.032735262,0.010412702,0.004227469,0.037375633,0.009096983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02656935,0.0004278651,0.00080098334,0.013140662,0.009669759,0.0107565485,0.0019480278,0.0008000741,0.0049320776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114550896,0.00028414142,0.0004379529,0.036568385,0.009948885,0.005289188,0.004169993,0.0012348848,0.00030799667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002806356,0.0000731432,0.59169275,0.0013505144,0.00033864164,0.00024678253,0.07659793,0.00085720344,0.0012803636,0.1135063,0.02024027,0.19353549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002788429,0.00007782666,0.7809597,0.0005780937,0.00014979209,0.00015051667,0.087793596,0.002059174,0.00067970017,0.01658729,0.11074296,0.0001935151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9323771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94522464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06903002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1023553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5008502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153953002","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5840","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Neurology Articles Published in General Medicine Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAMA Network Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Specialty; MEDLINE; Impact factor; Neurology; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.5422063564878029,"score_gpt":0.57587535029638,"score_spread":0.03366899380857713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153953002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458058,0.013401059,0.0015945585,0.0009741039,0.00010744039,0.00047595566,0.031301916,0.000245644,0.006093508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780547,0.0052905306,0.0016785322,0.00006906522,0.00019063173,0.00043867528,0.013687766,0.00003296997,0.00055713067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98530155,0.0029527345,0.0041858754,0.0012886705,0.0056663016,0.0006049948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157565,0.041669317,0.027460799,0.0026390287,0.011246896,0.0012274852],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010328937,0.00062653923,0.0019264972,0.11840008,0.0009575266,0.0029326866,0.0009795509,0.0005821424,0.0031150987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07287353,0.00026516127,0.0029024486,0.15441182,0.00070922927,0.0025664212,0.0021713225,0.00042263963,0.0006514054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029503767,0.0000950548,0.9493578,0.0038168808,0.00271335,0.0002872841,0.0009854126,0.0012379402,0.00068420725,0.00053796725,0.0033196234,0.036669508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003222316,0.0001702183,0.99013174,0.00043021495,0.00075754593,0.0005360825,0.0011994694,0.0023323868,0.0003321436,0.0005570874,0.0034853744,0.00003550363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049124914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038495774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002325883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027532645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054625273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155094413","doi":"10.1177/22925503211002456","title":"Identifying Predatory Journals in Plastic Surgery: A Prospective Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Checklist; Directory; Publishing; Web of science; Subspecialty; Home page; Psychology; World Wide Web; Medicine; MEDLINE; The Internet; Medical education; Family medicine; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.6082756874266116,"score_gpt":0.5389160202164178,"score_spread":0.06935966721019382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155094413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989925,0.00038051375,0.00006048883,0.0000653104,0.000008136941,0.000068917216,0.00007188235,0.0000018765005,0.00035040165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989513,0.0003800966,0.00016643191,0.00010030942,0.000028075694,0.00009089154,0.00009314588,0.0000030959802,0.00018659535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952054,0.0017243423,0.0008441353,0.00051152933,0.0011885079,0.0005261069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595845,0.01179397,0.021490851,0.0011014449,0.0027832359,0.0032460385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005570643,0.00035579407,0.0005894043,0.0036181014,0.001579379,0.0022068878,0.0006899843,0.0011788287,0.0037883124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026344452,0.00063652446,0.000589156,0.004383962,0.0010042207,0.0033006289,0.0019311493,0.0012871786,0.001045465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012630301,0.0002749419,0.9963903,0.000078139936,0.000016429598,0.00021443558,0.00089070643,0.0000112196985,0.000065574655,0.00002399091,0.00012434593,0.0017835667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030113271,0.0012249922,0.9900203,0.00010185556,0.000041578594,0.0013680251,0.006270725,0.0001444449,0.00008615121,0.000059850336,0.0006306252,0.000021459542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014917518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020016362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007791477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001335635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029460788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155168871","doi":"10.1037/cap0000280","title":"Update on publishing excellence in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Excellence; Publishing; Library science; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5803279467869964,"score_gpt":0.5557508892005159,"score_spread":0.024577057586480544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155168871","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012574397,0.54941237,0.0005762298,0.22981016,0.14840265,0.00017946937,0.026651306,0.00080404757,0.042906426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018995937,0.7018852,0.005019185,0.09129574,0.10071995,0.00034828988,0.03393453,0.00043931452,0.04736182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97593385,0.0016222658,0.0049966583,0.00081676454,0.014803933,0.001826475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66482323,0.03430063,0.013732887,0.004451534,0.26534963,0.017342055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026921678,0.001627952,0.0035529598,0.05427663,0.003239795,0.011092013,0.0061126626,0.0055314125,0.020022267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105067104,0.0010090984,0.0020385832,0.085293315,0.002579666,0.007762924,0.0037879522,0.005791951,0.009484392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038167887,0.000013696742,0.00059579144,0.0020280376,0.000049994596,0.000035416433,0.00009614781,0.000038653798,0.000038042806,0.00078909186,0.93818504,0.058091942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018140328,0.0000103232705,0.0055386676,0.0036014135,0.000111219146,0.00006843001,0.00014539393,0.000023325965,0.000041749918,0.00027177986,0.9901372,0.00003218145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6400121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.809437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102352016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72421587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155654304","doi":"10.2478/adms-2021-0001","title":"Advances in Materials Science Editorial on the Journal’s 20 <sup>th</sup> Anniversary","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Materials Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Physical Laboratory; Politechnika Koszalińska; University of Manchester; Indian Institute of Technology Bombay; German University in Cairo; University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy; Politechnika Czestochowska; Politechnika Warszawska; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Chalmers Tekniska Högskola; Politechnika Gdańska; University of Queensland","keywords":"Materials science; Engineering physics; Nanotechnology; Library science; Polymer science; Art history; Physics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.17158062782026937,"score_gpt":0.506170310979133,"score_spread":0.3345896831588636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155654304","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001579678,0.0035472,0.00018260734,0.017420473,0.974129,0.000021451158,0.00015367025,0.00015532383,0.0042323126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002073743,0.007795761,0.00067888235,0.013141791,0.9173278,0.000058411853,0.0004262889,0.00028163294,0.05821577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926945,0.000667323,0.00067550933,0.00073138316,0.004538324,0.00069299876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675482,0.0058737444,0.0015427255,0.0010638844,0.018159207,0.005812274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008062548,0.0028234425,0.0030943924,0.005506166,0.0031828845,0.010329162,0.0026055933,0.005986776,0.061917655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020068422,0.0011877544,0.0035401378,0.0022993116,0.0018324683,0.0039007305,0.0023080627,0.008488148,0.04035676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004097951,0.000020231073,0.00005384375,0.00017320628,0.00001499957,0.00006700164,0.000008967097,0.0000309581,0.00016373993,0.00042319874,0.9908957,0.008107161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037491944,0.00007140285,0.0005372673,0.000297496,0.000039479397,0.00019159066,0.000068056055,0.00012688006,0.000491557,0.0011465665,0.9969689,0.00002312646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005753321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020705007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061917655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020125187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004086251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156857722","doi":"10.1101/2021.04.14.439880","title":"How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact in research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Impact factor; Public relations; Scholarship; Infographic; Political science; Psychology; Library science; Accounting; Computer science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.66034381259884,"score_gpt":0.5706484058998011,"score_spread":0.08969540669903886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156857722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82596767,0.006411799,0.015525892,0.054310646,0.00076638587,0.00033906498,0.00034719508,0.00022102268,0.09611038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953153,0.00061439845,0.0015254528,0.0013023939,0.00012155749,0.000047460442,0.000051221923,0.000036864436,0.0009853874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8827054,0.060477838,0.008253825,0.0038746207,0.03737851,0.0073097926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7193775,0.12931372,0.04245945,0.013995881,0.05316292,0.041690454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07407853,0.00037994288,0.00084570865,0.011104059,0.0096248295,0.027151896,0.0015279636,0.0019395753,0.0033315131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25699037,0.00043974377,0.00054321124,0.009099145,0.019396756,0.01398602,0.014654295,0.0029124387,0.0005924953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034492457,0.00045724987,0.3820155,0.0010867615,0.0004286491,0.0004403023,0.26075986,0.0009883966,0.0020306467,0.07674667,0.020475503,0.25422558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010771724,0.0007945288,0.36972776,0.0023864934,0.00022278808,0.00071091694,0.3865213,0.0017330653,0.0023770567,0.124449134,0.110503525,0.00046570503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015645007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018654175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98889595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019280517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022938415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3917694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157754712","doi":"10.1093/jae/ejab008","title":"Does Experiencing International Research Collaboration Permanently Affect the Impact of Scientific Production? Evidence from Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Economies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Impact factor; Production (economics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.4956450253441177,"score_gpt":0.5801244604068394,"score_spread":0.08447943506272171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157754712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99009776,0.0029659576,0.00017978242,0.0011659188,0.000025830628,0.000010639102,0.00016833712,0.0000027563678,0.005383111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985953,0.0011260168,0.00003989216,0.000048083857,0.000021336717,0.0000035247926,0.00004020297,0.0000014947574,0.00012418903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942783,0.003204573,0.00028253664,0.00059721695,0.00066137227,0.0009758661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8969493,0.05923424,0.033470146,0.002689593,0.0027250808,0.0049316566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005961999,0.00038252978,0.0006692516,0.0016973895,0.0010435769,0.0027121813,0.0005725485,0.0008293201,0.0057134926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0401683,0.0002220788,0.00061871164,0.00398255,0.0022850141,0.0024041005,0.002990542,0.0011517593,0.00039735247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010292269,0.0006913083,0.95477974,0.00059556664,0.0008557801,0.0008437572,0.0058884653,0.00080524123,0.0006230994,0.004118596,0.0006825126,0.029086646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042390187,0.00034739883,0.9864536,0.0003115813,0.00031212316,0.00018847821,0.007826399,0.00024096845,0.00041183486,0.001398797,0.0024451702,0.000021258285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047636656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037882046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99830264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077881373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012602324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03153044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157857527","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvab048.888","title":"Publication Model, Ownership and Impact of the Top Endocrinology Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Government (linguistics); Bibliometrics; Medicine; Popularity; Library science; Test (biology); Internal medicine; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.48344321838547577,"score_gpt":0.5648659022913172,"score_spread":0.0814226839058414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157857527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97018236,0.005783667,0.0011675358,0.0013212742,0.00012256803,0.00009618595,0.007612016,0.00010880373,0.013605475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472505,0.0011412062,0.0006839588,0.000041444833,0.00016043935,0.000036205234,0.0019172947,0.000030509562,0.0012638448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877652,0.0021779484,0.0020992847,0.00094215584,0.0064085084,0.00060691254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85638106,0.06093144,0.052235156,0.004700629,0.017422007,0.008329646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010328957,0.0002860037,0.0005849556,0.012968189,0.0006016048,0.005669483,0.0009148883,0.0003571674,0.009493807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071604796,0.00019834489,0.00076748733,0.018170083,0.00072054233,0.002906076,0.0015083489,0.0005063342,0.0020442924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037166805,0.000111469475,0.9614955,0.00035791355,0.00023351249,0.0002810015,0.00076717936,0.00034190525,0.0004432552,0.0009762237,0.0022254873,0.032395005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038233997,0.00021653865,0.9871777,0.0001967574,0.00018929629,0.0009903528,0.0014589871,0.0014271531,0.00051106495,0.0011153484,0.006649927,0.000028590697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015485958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013259415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013076009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002231614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05462545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159603454","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105645","title":"Pharmacological Research: A bibliometric analysis from 1989 to 2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Pharmacological Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.8563292422533881,"score_gpt":0.7268144297834334,"score_spread":0.12951481246995478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159603454","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007398148,0.15708853,0.00045037927,0.12917429,0.7039812,0.000075803815,0.0021911582,0.00010222362,0.006196588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058933697,0.15544142,0.00072566286,0.017380692,0.81058586,0.00007872141,0.0010043213,0.00007985699,0.008810149],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878501,0.0017888888,0.0024059382,0.0005861224,0.0069741495,0.00039470347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92599374,0.030337848,0.006368918,0.0009532335,0.033928532,0.0024176785],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013022347,0.0023186256,0.0028551843,0.047156543,0.001978549,0.010206487,0.0021619115,0.0047112154,0.0049723936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06451844,0.00088422885,0.0019944326,0.0363317,0.002108008,0.005034045,0.0023585036,0.0052800993,0.0037511825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043099266,0.000017932964,0.0003571755,0.0019710485,0.0001054915,0.00009454438,0.000060818085,0.0000642934,0.000045786746,0.0005204918,0.952673,0.0440462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004771086,0.000029729288,0.0047623035,0.0050468748,0.00038453462,0.0002768891,0.00022012016,0.00023123526,0.00016395362,0.0013209489,0.98747176,0.00004396013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010396965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02587523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006620462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010335666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06886959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161634579","doi":"10.2196/29507","title":"Authors’ Reply to: Redundancy of Terms in Search Strategies. Comment on “Searching PubMed to Retrieve Publications on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Search Strings”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Information retrieval; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Data science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.821415364529672,"score_gpt":0.6541132984116215,"score_spread":0.16730206611805054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161634579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012834725,0.00023315255,0.00006959245,0.9869054,0.011930808,0.000011230526,0.00012287071,0.000033984743,0.00056467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00081712747,0.00015951085,0.0001703674,0.98808867,0.009482258,0.00003892,0.000037235965,0.000022596343,0.0011832673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98754555,0.0025944987,0.0027231048,0.0015882087,0.004414208,0.0011344695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9227089,0.046530735,0.0039963443,0.0019248654,0.020449188,0.004389972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017131688,0.0010501122,0.0017503477,0.0024041473,0.005773293,0.005183427,0.0039690956,0.05953141,0.013368261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12760963,0.0014728212,0.0022137687,0.0030373745,0.005686759,0.0064389445,0.0031242424,0.045640662,0.015244791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029101893,0.000008727737,0.00031408053,0.000039143364,0.000009198911,0.00024129504,0.00012394984,0.000021853592,0.00005807269,0.00076999766,0.99640036,0.001984259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016155766,0.00005807507,0.0017547484,0.0005404624,0.00004973112,0.00139599,0.00091098587,0.00040492718,0.00049394276,0.008410082,0.98566574,0.00015376134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016973142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019640429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99759585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075397617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010033761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0906021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161776032","doi":"","title":"Potential Canadian Contributions to Challenge Area 1 — Science Investigations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.6676703809152691,"score_gpt":0.5253014860566976,"score_spread":0.14236889485857152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161776032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04368789,0.024768086,0.0054949154,0.4309611,0.005447185,0.00063832133,0.005648366,0.0004548805,0.4828992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6384023,0.040614285,0.0357664,0.052015714,0.0024456126,0.0006418948,0.006477176,0.0003673094,0.22326931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851573,0.0025160348,0.0003621779,0.00079731474,0.004662631,0.0031461506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94677883,0.0069421628,0.0015056095,0.0018157721,0.0345356,0.008421957],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013869432,0.0011928679,0.0011771086,0.012833127,0.018346407,0.014068237,0.003898065,0.0038260699,0.027658783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035863373,0.00053312007,0.0012864665,0.018396102,0.0049554594,0.0056816116,0.006893077,0.0043516196,0.0020857987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005174215,0.00030511452,0.021098258,0.0015776965,0.0001659174,0.0007909006,0.0072785444,0.0021801717,0.0014098595,0.44448283,0.31898507,0.20120822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015719525,0.00010558713,0.034645908,0.000953225,0.00015322394,0.0002249702,0.013143075,0.0020948055,0.0011586214,0.059770484,0.88739127,0.00020164892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1363815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44111332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98952174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162055002","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20211085","title":"Gendered Citations at Top Economic Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Information economics; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.5186671143313683,"score_gpt":0.5418338010536898,"score_spread":0.023166686722321583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162055002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95671433,0.007381252,0.0008267642,0.0021984982,0.0001829207,0.00001739656,0.007155778,0.000040500014,0.025482561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199533,0.0018304588,0.0003155682,0.00018849444,0.00025440284,0.00001598093,0.002135482,0.00001835465,0.003245983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964269,0.00085285644,0.00034109244,0.0005581023,0.0014513159,0.0003697254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531326,0.02093984,0.016948067,0.0018394681,0.004101577,0.003038366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033729093,0.00028810225,0.0007868636,0.010798245,0.00082839164,0.0029417286,0.00044465094,0.0006496908,0.011404391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035259828,0.00011114448,0.0003202198,0.014080074,0.0007241174,0.0023465971,0.001741437,0.00051727594,0.0021809714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033202834,0.00008204995,0.90854996,0.000678651,0.00027698465,0.0004210202,0.009944367,0.00038322542,0.0025980463,0.007690754,0.0069435486,0.06209927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002276716,0.000105409796,0.9588086,0.00025930078,0.000086530796,0.0005192412,0.006717831,0.00029337383,0.00085461326,0.0063750194,0.025921885,0.000035504512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002868401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004005902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007446354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005414702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038151503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163219630","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/rqwea","title":"Fake collaborations: Interdisciplinary science can undermine research integrity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scientific integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Academic integrity; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.8797457237471681,"score_gpt":0.7091312008736873,"score_spread":0.17061452287348078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163219630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18310663,0.016780078,0.14505577,0.42326322,0.0040674107,0.000454679,0.00059840054,0.00072762964,0.22594623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94524777,0.0035965561,0.020222446,0.021113705,0.0016964116,0.0003486618,0.00015393696,0.00015234086,0.007468085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.79786545,0.12782414,0.009231977,0.01254626,0.047959294,0.0045729172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38575032,0.42950287,0.087497525,0.06637571,0.02220586,0.008667714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12791727,0.00080285675,0.0019337907,0.008827574,0.009138781,0.0245013,0.0024667531,0.00919548,0.011660653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36322132,0.000785621,0.0012539291,0.011670455,0.028064048,0.027063139,0.015494859,0.0078375805,0.0024638753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030014958,0.0001553323,0.034725115,0.0011023264,0.000348168,0.0011007459,0.025856635,0.001356669,0.0014599608,0.7701588,0.027113654,0.1363224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009442498,0.0001945006,0.015614491,0.001594285,0.00021805044,0.002261863,0.014280668,0.0037037106,0.002587711,0.8384025,0.12087383,0.00017394795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015341742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017852793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063029276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069091367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6764993},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3163374609","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol26no1.7","title":"The internationalization of Chinese scholarly journals based on publications deriving from the G8 countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Government of Jiangsu Province","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Political science; Library science; Discipline; Web of science; Chinese academy of sciences; Regional science; Geography; Business; International trade; MEDLINE; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.19250478796630904,"score_gpt":0.4673025271239805,"score_spread":0.2747977391576715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163374609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988893,0.0016238812,0.00020876522,0.00020021728,0.000022623193,0.00001711451,0.0008070334,0.000016290462,0.008211088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970061,0.0012830539,0.00026208002,0.000020237949,0.00003225068,0.000015911799,0.00077068293,0.000003902937,0.00060585013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986608,0.00015609579,0.00028524527,0.00022586438,0.00045757066,0.00021440261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940882,0.0013575559,0.0021720116,0.00030274817,0.0016078998,0.00047161186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018351908,0.00035286762,0.00040157232,0.020673756,0.0008284888,0.0031947766,0.00037531444,0.00020972607,0.0018221143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056820777,0.00009600788,0.0004689966,0.026635727,0.00059896585,0.001856019,0.0013643528,0.00022106833,0.0002190712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069362126,0.00002455458,0.9288002,0.00041211443,0.00018217551,0.00054450455,0.004823558,0.00059460866,0.0013293406,0.0032267554,0.0012618634,0.058730856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004598572,0.000030282346,0.9858078,0.00013222358,0.00013311455,0.00028430423,0.0044629397,0.00084631407,0.00068012095,0.00061382516,0.0069889966,0.000015468331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006804205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008554936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012750219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021863221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0135291815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163855067","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0251488","title":"Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Top-down and bottom-up design; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.8861340694074553,"score_gpt":0.5914378414414244,"score_spread":0.2946962279660309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163855067","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24215317,0.010185316,0.47002518,0.13840547,0.00094065635,0.0010566073,0.0011856473,0.0009405712,0.13510738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727558,0.0026441517,0.112843074,0.0036122284,0.00036699523,0.0010573006,0.0003381731,0.00049102976,0.0058911433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89273816,0.05437709,0.0074733747,0.014292523,0.021420594,0.00969829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7654219,0.15246662,0.02698443,0.023176199,0.024870178,0.007080574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08347752,0.0012580815,0.0026125642,0.011657735,0.015861163,0.047130078,0.004233549,0.006129932,0.0057763923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2684659,0.0020454873,0.002036767,0.013921658,0.021526132,0.05894845,0.024162782,0.010978355,0.0014305571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003075897,0.00007946112,0.04575401,0.0009487893,0.00022935962,0.0006794603,0.057235364,0.0100381905,0.0013704724,0.6832962,0.009470383,0.19059065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057229634,0.00009697653,0.021441588,0.0012981815,0.00012436889,0.000326745,0.020570539,0.011761892,0.0012693784,0.86917114,0.07372053,0.00016142952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024035698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014603088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02354937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02020724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44147658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164382659","doi":"","title":"The Fall of the Innovation Empire and its Possible Rise Through Open Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Intellectual property; Productivity; General partnership; Open innovation; Economics; Open science; Knowledge creation; Public economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Market economy; Management; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.3621927008974681,"score_gpt":0.5484679756458216,"score_spread":0.18627527474835354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164382659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20831732,0.06576599,0.03788631,0.4179471,0.0006625577,0.000079173435,0.0002617574,0.00024755826,0.26883224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659544,0.013591009,0.00733694,0.0045809806,0.0008438016,0.00009291254,0.00006391781,0.00007080996,0.007465263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901253,0.0040061865,0.00042661963,0.0012615809,0.0029795165,0.001200811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588585,0.027730998,0.003599874,0.003993942,0.0034712215,0.0023454044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020424226,0.00031925229,0.0012766332,0.0038074956,0.004109262,0.015552069,0.0011827028,0.006004788,0.0070044096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043555506,0.00056362565,0.00065891625,0.003690378,0.03347444,0.032425452,0.0077909604,0.006735008,0.0009306539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064552936,0.0000480727,0.0028892132,0.0001597917,0.000020163983,0.00010228678,0.0015228989,0.0007415935,0.00018382022,0.9618729,0.0019940473,0.030400675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040568088,0.00005609801,0.0059322976,0.00034501706,0.000009028505,0.00014494568,0.0014943036,0.0016386856,0.00025911073,0.93486404,0.05518635,0.000029576799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030893276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002520013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008770892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006761663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10801494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164514146","doi":"","title":"Publishing trends in the International Journal of Sport Psychology during the First 50 years (1970-2019), with a particular focus on Asia and Oceania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Political science; Social science; Geography; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09065119268014045,"score_gpt":0.33708080366100157,"score_spread":0.24642961098086114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164514146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57267106,0.27474895,0.00078202016,0.010564968,0.002979939,0.00023786268,0.10199807,0.0003394081,0.035677712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.735614,0.19565912,0.0027764027,0.0016790847,0.0035841097,0.00038562823,0.04407717,0.00017368188,0.016050836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594563,0.0003671064,0.0011893319,0.0006050173,0.0014230163,0.00046998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95487493,0.012134141,0.017559802,0.00091812725,0.010631177,0.0038818254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036533647,0.00046487615,0.00085302617,0.053878687,0.00093741197,0.0054530776,0.0006238344,0.00078112783,0.0047544013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0207027,0.00025822988,0.00094980834,0.07500221,0.0007267801,0.0036258448,0.0014014876,0.0009604504,0.001976458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005007981,0.00012591726,0.68190604,0.0135400025,0.0008255985,0.0015195179,0.008885363,0.0003569628,0.0030650755,0.004035594,0.04251376,0.24272533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016549582,0.00013454798,0.8891334,0.0020938287,0.00025619505,0.0013741038,0.0045498232,0.0001725582,0.00060700125,0.00042062972,0.10120145,0.00003996668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011307973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027861888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99634665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00163606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045363405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022484303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164682760","doi":"10.1177/09610006211016533","title":"How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Literacy; Information literacy; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.42365335728596165,"score_gpt":0.45484211218195625,"score_spread":0.031188754895994597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164682760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95145494,0.0027538373,0.00040892104,0.02103083,0.000095679046,0.000045380177,0.00004723258,0.000036369845,0.024126723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346644,0.0017121496,0.00015615294,0.002817712,0.00007182018,0.000027395123,0.0000375982,0.0000090619105,0.0017017719],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98670006,0.008341243,0.0007698102,0.0005813066,0.001914024,0.0016936044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521958,0.021101283,0.013886033,0.0016176222,0.0068465895,0.00435264],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013864672,0.00023943196,0.0005838099,0.0037073635,0.0067919837,0.014800843,0.0013677328,0.0025771973,0.0036331427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04758746,0.00036418156,0.00036909932,0.0061055166,0.006222935,0.007158517,0.0065635564,0.0017617415,0.0006963269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024520565,0.00024117088,0.26426646,0.00068999256,0.00006590136,0.0024504636,0.63757807,0.00014479474,0.00086969446,0.0053775073,0.005443517,0.08262723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016641074,0.00005663739,0.061787415,0.00022588766,0.000023657984,0.00040649273,0.9171843,0.000101133875,0.00017742389,0.0015489865,0.01843637,0.00003508843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02068263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024709584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98519915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061223023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008198476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07332426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165220065","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-480702/v1","title":"Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mega-; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.7924712251922145,"score_gpt":0.667428192781796,"score_spread":0.12504303241041848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165220065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96061116,0.0014971534,0.0056293053,0.003722875,0.00014780877,0.00012965892,0.0003812429,0.00012326798,0.027757406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922069,0.00024450762,0.003619861,0.0001601367,0.00009155171,0.00006640379,0.00021901602,0.000049872542,0.003341719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734341,0.010599469,0.0022766935,0.0032419171,0.0084692575,0.0019786556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76784605,0.14098388,0.038011856,0.0107741505,0.026103206,0.016280878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017929826,0.0002787205,0.00067637797,0.008428502,0.004033468,0.008510897,0.0016965016,0.0018916125,0.005471054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15467972,0.00057851756,0.00046926335,0.00958893,0.0011917447,0.004719108,0.0038296976,0.0010891192,0.0017778524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006109537,0.00017267051,0.7791768,0.0008461703,0.00037118164,0.0009841503,0.03302663,0.00047671513,0.00525502,0.036920745,0.010796086,0.13136292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011591882,0.00033033098,0.791277,0.0005046052,0.0002571526,0.0027800414,0.06742265,0.008932424,0.0041447785,0.04197056,0.082056135,0.00020854328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016403729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00544664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018669874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038817856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09482312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165371237","doi":"10.20913/1815-3186-2021-1-25-42","title":"Science of science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bibliosphere","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Citation; Big data; Creativity; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6055228389306013,"score_gpt":0.6101202218160866,"score_spread":0.004597382885485279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165371237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011685587,0.0355103,0.007680932,0.17255095,0.03264578,0.00027380665,0.0052402965,0.00072618027,0.7442032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14318755,0.1468424,0.022809023,0.1585519,0.041819945,0.0020889244,0.014270763,0.0014710992,0.46895835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912307,0.0022805477,0.0005657902,0.001987559,0.0033186364,0.0006167902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105483,0.0022536647,0.00055673777,0.0018400269,0.0032080587,0.0010867513],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005803289,0.001113499,0.0016013028,0.0025034836,0.002952721,0.011399934,0.0020594196,0.0062413686,0.15487538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025365705,0.00039212834,0.00078001915,0.0029319602,0.007090951,0.009054789,0.005953024,0.008112881,0.079712585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036756646,0.000029691731,0.00047534436,0.0009811906,0.000040363964,0.000104926854,0.00030105843,0.0002444447,0.00020980337,0.3663001,0.52924633,0.102029994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006598189,0.000009402078,0.00016284618,0.00049092673,0.0000062900526,0.000050058286,0.000080983795,0.00005382992,0.0000423876,0.05239222,0.9466974,0.000006971649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029328065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019575264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99749655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052869907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013737249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5181098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165405438","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2021.05.009","title":"Evaluation of Open-Access Journals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Directory; Medicine; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Observational study; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science; Pregnancy; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.48713758103991484,"score_gpt":0.5498045149921652,"score_spread":0.06266693395225037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165405438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9058707,0.030965235,0.0008863163,0.0043748864,0.0008204144,0.00092649116,0.0187114,0.00017526725,0.037269283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850085,0.004861727,0.0012088716,0.0003806434,0.0005757441,0.00015632155,0.0057296893,0.000043173393,0.0020354323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9214505,0.011844481,0.012481218,0.0025736918,0.048419245,0.0032309308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6768741,0.092154875,0.062709905,0.0075721466,0.13595264,0.02473636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023839634,0.000741301,0.0023335977,0.07225972,0.0029052882,0.015059433,0.002415043,0.0017065225,0.006581717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2068456,0.00032321794,0.0019468701,0.09595634,0.002130873,0.0048564537,0.005443745,0.00087223254,0.0012322317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010225908,0.0006336435,0.8746738,0.0038174782,0.0014967555,0.0004963498,0.003636374,0.00036870746,0.00071563246,0.0021158606,0.0073648063,0.10365795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008372716,0.00033517482,0.97895765,0.0007631414,0.0006671273,0.00044700096,0.0060780942,0.0005554164,0.00044873767,0.0008715556,0.010737682,0.000054667955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039796315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06819759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99758494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0110596465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025729898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12607753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165769365","doi":"","title":"A scientometric analysis of the science system in Tanzania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Universiteit Stellenbosch; Polytechnique Montréal; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Robert Bosch Stiftung; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Tanzania; Scientometrics; Geography; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.24629676303025,"score_gpt":0.46431148390683685,"score_spread":0.21801472087658685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165769365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929032,0.0007102853,0.00016470738,0.000244568,0.000006911055,0.000044563185,0.001585628,0.000005763888,0.0043344633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.000369867,0.00031858266,0.00001815365,0.000007985654,0.000015678703,0.00082064135,0.0000016422362,0.0007711602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942917,0.00018163613,0.00006522365,0.00004135383,0.00012306476,0.00015958419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982236,0.0005223587,0.00040662603,0.000053025713,0.0006146754,0.00017977877],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009093362,0.00018725634,0.00024753666,0.013232034,0.0010670008,0.0013373067,0.0002295752,0.00023509748,0.0032639694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037933004,0.00013543268,0.00027393835,0.022031534,0.00037217635,0.0005375105,0.0007013772,0.00022913828,0.000406061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032374446,0.000100848214,0.92192334,0.00078304147,0.00012103043,0.0014082587,0.005952682,0.0018728494,0.0031835695,0.007633411,0.0039038842,0.052793264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009351381,0.00005923917,0.98952496,0.00007945566,0.00005890285,0.00011864856,0.00413367,0.0013309068,0.0003786405,0.0002818157,0.0040161805,0.000008134933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16022672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17609204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98676795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037445505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004045116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31858814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165949093","doi":"10.82308/5582","title":"Working in the lab : social organization of research and training in biomedical research labs in Canada and its relationship to research funding","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Medical education; Business; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.6855037452262233,"score_gpt":0.5490594650064561,"score_spread":0.13644428021976718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165949093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637885,0.0009907308,0.0006354461,0.008782308,0.0000759011,0.00012427063,0.00024949774,0.000025039197,0.025328312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996865,0.00045955245,0.00025575433,0.0004740068,0.000014121408,0.000033786673,0.000059002945,0.000012353637,0.0018264174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836482,0.005015031,0.00055768655,0.001040964,0.0048130774,0.004925081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655303,0.00822489,0.0049850973,0.0007701853,0.007923306,0.0125663495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008611114,0.0003121527,0.0005444037,0.0046779066,0.025561478,0.009777402,0.0025958726,0.0014921223,0.0033397437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019699099,0.00041372865,0.0005080064,0.008012335,0.018673962,0.0029945923,0.008684085,0.0025889713,0.0001949564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021638823,0.00015661462,0.25592864,0.0003220423,0.0000825549,0.0009240832,0.673378,0.0003754302,0.0013579994,0.018649781,0.005341661,0.04326692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017415083,0.00006500945,0.3692228,0.00021620729,0.000025860008,0.00010131547,0.5966343,0.00038951938,0.00021481884,0.0015196734,0.031497136,0.00009591003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99138886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13126911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20500998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9524285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166733659","doi":"10.56042/alis.v68i2.40763","title":"A scientometric analysis and visualization of the 50 highly cited papers of Eugene Garfield","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Citation; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Popularity; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.46229539959037325,"score_gpt":0.5310908397427637,"score_spread":0.06879544015239047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166733659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.863223,0.013328547,0.01771481,0.0068447036,0.0009585001,0.00036522702,0.017589627,0.0024463776,0.07752914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496647,0.0071027656,0.02506264,0.00025791058,0.0006139128,0.0002713443,0.007000077,0.00030437787,0.009722223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975552,0.0004339823,0.000252427,0.00020386677,0.0013404636,0.0002141103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900969,0.0049284357,0.0015829119,0.0005351042,0.0024254527,0.0004311227],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004270663,0.0007380504,0.0006495437,0.07468676,0.0018519714,0.0047681252,0.00042106782,0.0007264186,0.007941419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015217743,0.00021503428,0.0010822971,0.07905523,0.0006428436,0.002809151,0.0015423598,0.00047424226,0.0015050346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005819487,0.0002526753,0.20345135,0.0030269271,0.0006889359,0.0028718181,0.018714461,0.004884941,0.022880819,0.021838704,0.06471373,0.6560938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735666,0.0003029622,0.76074725,0.0008007945,0.00028711776,0.0023611085,0.017070737,0.012820597,0.009586399,0.01442703,0.18130344,0.00023512307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049824584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004376617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92531323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012612273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013115635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026566684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167630218","doi":"10.29173/cais1224","title":"The burden of article processing charges on Canadian universities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Institution; Scholarly communication; Resource (disambiguation); Business; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1883200148984631,"score_gpt":0.4087411580688233,"score_spread":0.22042114317036018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167630218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030121554,0.0048508747,0.0035878082,0.035029754,0.0038733159,0.0006327931,0.012055498,0.0028411415,0.9070073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.302713,0.009831668,0.011449474,0.009166469,0.0012704069,0.00048356949,0.0088551445,0.001066224,0.655164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97480804,0.0019429892,0.0009610911,0.0009381706,0.018650811,0.0026988217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8862558,0.022490276,0.0055455966,0.009388938,0.06532704,0.010992342],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009843696,0.00066026684,0.0012366223,0.0092972275,0.009131037,0.013345482,0.0019710502,0.0022975304,0.1584741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08181143,0.0009657793,0.0012393697,0.01607932,0.0021664607,0.0033225226,0.0034691652,0.0022641583,0.03977103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019937291,0.000090847076,0.0075979633,0.0005200647,0.00006040085,0.00034702677,0.0016315929,0.00046392513,0.002306549,0.055330858,0.67558074,0.2558707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006256987,0.0000559553,0.040544156,0.000340432,0.000057089455,0.00059158355,0.0021080507,0.0012645096,0.0012985894,0.0043748342,0.9491724,0.00012980588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80306673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7481568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04670453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14785445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5301487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167786700","doi":"","title":"Rankings of Canadian Universities with Regard to Research in Economics at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Business Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Productivity; Positive economics; Economics; Classical economics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3810775587525595,"score_gpt":0.461887675585484,"score_spread":0.0808101168329245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167786700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7312759,0.014092773,0.0009103527,0.008240382,0.00027488932,0.00008529088,0.0071590506,0.00014053563,0.23782082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96912056,0.004248484,0.0008050113,0.00038927654,0.000043131575,0.000024180757,0.0015306084,0.000023359764,0.023815427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924305,0.00037268666,0.00021156487,0.00024826935,0.0041651493,0.0025719611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745491,0.001787527,0.0016525318,0.00034970153,0.017220737,0.004440344],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037518155,0.00030632163,0.0004438575,0.022271452,0.007779223,0.006005326,0.00084378006,0.00059023034,0.004255896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013465938,0.00018436552,0.0004884078,0.027652988,0.0016311908,0.0011961852,0.0014755003,0.000701665,0.00049411785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008291958,0.00010819327,0.46612948,0.0009473742,0.000248435,0.00092453597,0.055809766,0.0026229634,0.0035761748,0.11774781,0.055269197,0.29578686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129073205,0.000066385175,0.8319479,0.00022929185,0.00005054331,0.00016713918,0.020072643,0.0005513566,0.0008994569,0.0014652164,0.14439674,0.00014044027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9653134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08339527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07588725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60507786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168126397","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/gj4aq","title":"The Globalization of Science: The Increasing Power of Individual Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; Strong; McGill University; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Curiosity; Global network; Global public good; Work (physics); Public good; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Neoclassical economics; Law; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.4004936075288349,"score_gpt":0.5645794587077106,"score_spread":0.16408585117887575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168126397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35130566,0.04796224,0.054438718,0.100071184,0.0016204845,0.00017422647,0.0014287155,0.00039371653,0.442605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557012,0.02193402,0.00910664,0.0048441393,0.0013567385,0.00011715178,0.0003517261,0.00012029158,0.0064680586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946525,0.0022105041,0.00024224362,0.0008117342,0.0016874237,0.00039562347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890352,0.0058984216,0.0019484469,0.0013362074,0.001039697,0.00074208406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004813059,0.00048538714,0.00070974045,0.006171071,0.0037311653,0.015244984,0.0006785173,0.0020702425,0.0059126723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012352204,0.00032269757,0.0006744084,0.012276617,0.011964705,0.019622464,0.007888897,0.0023287083,0.0006523889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007931976,0.000058165886,0.044401143,0.0011440268,0.00017878803,0.0006797668,0.086475044,0.0015112974,0.0015124574,0.66711193,0.022602526,0.17424549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001791977,0.00009141727,0.049217112,0.0010529517,0.00009120478,0.0009063656,0.037528105,0.0012815307,0.00072715397,0.42792824,0.48105994,0.00009803695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024120135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019559108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028129045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028653583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025454223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168137565","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v7.32145","title":"\"The IR is a Nice Thing But...\": Attitudes and Perceptions of the Institutional Repository","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Perception; Medical education; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Nice; Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.3230787922797111,"score_gpt":0.4549300534203716,"score_spread":0.13185126114066054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168137565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894003,0.00029071548,0.00022145508,0.0035323699,0.000020868985,0.000026655309,0.00004063008,0.0000084001695,0.006458597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997042,0.0003302503,0.00013980904,0.00085351884,0.000019211875,0.000013799144,0.000027836943,0.000006605695,0.0015670359],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904393,0.004542852,0.00064418314,0.00044161198,0.002746408,0.0011856548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648362,0.012429877,0.009700003,0.00153396,0.005918513,0.005581457],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015245994,0.00017282186,0.00033431267,0.0015887083,0.00525108,0.008027907,0.0010257933,0.0011029504,0.0031611926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170033,0.00032618878,0.0003664318,0.002057541,0.0072617605,0.004310517,0.0037182411,0.0016075867,0.0004891584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013042106,0.00016856732,0.35073382,0.00015116257,0.000037896425,0.00045755281,0.6150442,0.000042969645,0.0010153508,0.0014761826,0.002359123,0.0283828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011953323,0.00011839605,0.18433386,0.00015026816,0.000021189135,0.00022109316,0.8061892,0.00010676084,0.0002566465,0.0002704881,0.008282278,0.000037938196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14056896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18675694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006218439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008629439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27950156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168378160","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.14723481.v1","title":"“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Computer science; Constructive; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Key (lock); Peer review; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.6298690099803244,"score_gpt":0.6269340447212391,"score_spread":0.0029349652590852093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168378160","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008398505,0.0058208904,0.7615956,0.0347055,0.03670615,0.08963965,0.01089158,0.030565806,0.029235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021114752,0.0028621326,0.8880857,0.0070187924,0.0061517414,0.07203015,0.0032459334,0.0042196778,0.014274421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7123514,0.19568075,0.057337932,0.006755643,0.025460271,0.0024139648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28877556,0.40987626,0.03551628,0.07294626,0.18109986,0.011785749],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26734746,0.0045022825,0.005823139,0.017734662,0.005479381,0.017299576,0.010128781,0.011295404,0.13910137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50040895,0.0058597163,0.0048711905,0.013891833,0.008548011,0.012186806,0.011989912,0.020648187,0.18752617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041169723,0.0003394917,0.00025382065,0.0092117805,0.00019372824,0.0005532436,0.004244695,0.0010230392,0.004622052,0.023774223,0.71358967,0.24178256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032114328,0.00019903723,0.00049647706,0.005397159,0.000054811768,0.0004929349,0.0008109037,0.0013943969,0.0014050901,0.0326068,0.9565518,0.00026947103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020818699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044822083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73265254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00671132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044038497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.903491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169848230","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003","title":"Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Psychology; Test (biology); Empirical research; Econometrics; Dispersion (optics); Social psychology; Statistics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40184467338185004,"score_gpt":0.5088002697968736,"score_spread":0.10695559641502361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169848230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52058846,0.0038918864,0.4114423,0.02176025,0.0027501788,0.0032797921,0.0033338105,0.001856562,0.031096686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221911,0.00028524306,0.16518246,0.005764284,0.0005722091,0.0025555335,0.0015174696,0.00072844134,0.0012032643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.70233464,0.16260065,0.023400627,0.044584263,0.063380316,0.003699381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3147424,0.4542759,0.04384037,0.14221726,0.041948687,0.0029754573],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2736568,0.0012110468,0.002066579,0.008604383,0.0038005526,0.0137675945,0.0035411841,0.0031558808,0.0025472655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5709922,0.00096749695,0.0026563837,0.00678899,0.013515991,0.010339403,0.009692393,0.0056295954,0.00096544356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003529248,0.0010473198,0.2155009,0.0039222916,0.0080960365,0.0015002092,0.14399289,0.004893637,0.025985992,0.27498287,0.025969023,0.29057965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074336067,0.00082073075,0.20625256,0.0025706387,0.0029789319,0.00083569915,0.048142906,0.02521282,0.025802761,0.59728754,0.08857501,0.0007771231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021111178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014935653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7263432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036888446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039037645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89571047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170565256","doi":"10.3145/epi.2021.may.14","title":"Letter. New Google Scholar section with information on funded publications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"El Profesional de la Informacion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Geological Survey; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Health Research Council of New Zealand; UK Research and Innovation; National Institutes of Health; Vetenskapsrådet; CHDI Foundation; Autism Speaks","keywords":"Section (typography); Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public access; Political science","score_opus":0.3197258988707971,"score_gpt":0.5281324956147102,"score_spread":0.2084065967439131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170565256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019419556,0.0010614943,0.00009315952,0.9241394,0.07028586,0.000011295584,0.00012295591,0.000056564815,0.0040351776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017663913,0.0007915114,0.0002038262,0.9133295,0.062038183,0.000029068577,0.000057175672,0.00005253344,0.021731751],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934716,0.0008700085,0.00074943365,0.0008622865,0.0033829866,0.0006636692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979251,0.0095315855,0.0016004075,0.00055858033,0.0067100474,0.0023482684],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005759266,0.0010296489,0.0011839742,0.0013259212,0.004684997,0.0069036777,0.001833846,0.032659482,0.011658432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038783416,0.0009133035,0.0016677942,0.0011986655,0.0027177886,0.0050121127,0.0016236771,0.025875092,0.016272414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015478025,0.0000069802336,0.00008273078,0.00001554268,0.0000025831273,0.000102605474,0.000020170062,0.0000075279654,0.00004635791,0.00062607985,0.9965468,0.0025271706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032515014,0.000024623076,0.0005089605,0.000101243844,0.000011210707,0.00038053133,0.00012881368,0.00009996198,0.00017820777,0.0013698337,0.9971378,0.000026258263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005801517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01216134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041638548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007610117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039001346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173679898","doi":"10.19044/esj.2021.v17n21p316","title":"Use Of Altmetric And Bibliometric Indicators To Measure Scientific Productivity In The Fields Of Life And Earth Sciences: Case Study From Haiti","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Scientific Journal ESJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Bibliometrics; Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; Citation; Web of science; Rank (graph theory); Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Library science; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Data mining; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.6382513559673828,"score_gpt":0.4979921611889623,"score_spread":0.14025919477842053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173679898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996539,0.00010657808,0.00045199995,0.000082418046,0.0000032047806,0.00006698757,0.000094630464,0.0000059490017,0.0026493229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968838,0.00023921864,0.001990564,0.000025417366,0.000008159673,0.00005222173,0.00013640526,0.0000031937013,0.0006609688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822587,0.00073650293,0.00017456664,0.0001687916,0.00046860537,0.00022568593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943652,0.0030518514,0.0008995457,0.0002734855,0.0011795012,0.00023042703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003543869,0.00031367296,0.00033140212,0.0053140023,0.0011629858,0.0016728268,0.00059529353,0.0005833613,0.0007010588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058529065,0.00016097979,0.00035619913,0.009064712,0.0011842377,0.0008589236,0.0010062587,0.00036260547,0.00013920561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003626752,0.0014380934,0.8987156,0.00060421455,0.00013870574,0.0039142934,0.014221264,0.0028282169,0.0043278467,0.0027146777,0.00039339572,0.07034101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003239672,0.00077524607,0.9461082,0.0001096793,0.00015270218,0.0012869773,0.035532624,0.007017929,0.004289741,0.0005440557,0.004097994,0.000052389154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060510512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077792436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99645615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025269494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002954603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120316625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174891973","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.015","title":"“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Matching (statistics); Scale (ratio); Scope (computer science); Guideline; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Medicine","score_opus":0.9363805130465965,"score_gpt":0.7299491902987689,"score_spread":0.2064313227478276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174891973","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17139246,0.046517648,0.50755024,0.196535,0.013255007,0.033042062,0.007120536,0.0018903078,0.022696689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26612717,0.0040553664,0.7027711,0.010183247,0.0016342635,0.011839694,0.002254017,0.00015836734,0.0009767902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5145799,0.23867068,0.12408482,0.010427847,0.10787991,0.0043569175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1339005,0.478157,0.0804621,0.043284524,0.25995693,0.004238937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4501584,0.0025464334,0.00745603,0.048079193,0.0071390127,0.01729921,0.0127352085,0.008308707,0.0023032748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7418891,0.0016249237,0.010119731,0.041159023,0.01107145,0.018139008,0.00895366,0.006787283,0.0010693326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012844268,0.0010150715,0.35215068,0.022735432,0.0063698567,0.00044577525,0.0077224993,0.0019858268,0.0011876519,0.058982473,0.036671605,0.50944865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003255252,0.006789845,0.47583175,0.06817454,0.024357846,0.0023296715,0.02495906,0.040707417,0.009544604,0.2381467,0.10308961,0.0028137153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010776437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019128276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016416717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04827559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6780526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3175239229","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation Management With Zotero: Create a Zotero Record for a Legal Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal citation; Citation; Legal research; Business; Political science; Law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.7003338207509366,"score_gpt":0.6137667461557369,"score_spread":0.08656707459519974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175239229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016274401,0.0034195157,0.053625096,0.013162986,0.0025522579,0.0042744516,0.07873492,0.046658922,0.79594445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072868187,0.009371369,0.22746837,0.003520825,0.0008361719,0.0037365889,0.046778254,0.017617993,0.6833837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923764,0.0010155082,0.0007220155,0.00031681955,0.005161061,0.0004082546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656504,0.009455643,0.0015369867,0.003214314,0.018743705,0.0013988712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008498733,0.0009571676,0.0009947867,0.019328216,0.0046251453,0.008185293,0.0024747257,0.0023667791,0.34219724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050778355,0.0015980843,0.0007923945,0.022567028,0.0017001469,0.0086730085,0.0031347135,0.002139125,0.21106304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012219166,0.000018802077,0.0002312652,0.0003279364,0.000002928793,0.00004061903,0.00039613064,0.000071137314,0.00021404531,0.010730964,0.89514613,0.09280779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097700095,0.000005577555,0.00037711186,0.00021170436,0.0000029202442,0.000041707543,0.0001669306,0.000110601446,0.00020422008,0.0016212345,0.99722856,0.000019712035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2068851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38737252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34219724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067259385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030762564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9382758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175903833","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00142","title":"Uncited papers are not useless","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Citation; Poisson process; Measure (data warehouse); Poisson distribution; The arts; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.891090757630023,"score_gpt":0.6925934581402525,"score_spread":0.19849729948977046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175903833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468812,0.0034472316,0.019792005,0.003568254,0.00023268125,0.000039266237,0.0012712613,0.0004373221,0.024330767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491876,0.00047151936,0.0015329504,0.00014222195,0.00011647783,0.000015182354,0.00031401962,0.000057302357,0.0024315177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248075,0.0022266072,0.000697473,0.0014202142,0.002520205,0.0006548417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8182799,0.11229154,0.030913234,0.0189161,0.013750462,0.005848796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007044163,0.00035064697,0.0013297759,0.0076574855,0.0022729135,0.006618687,0.0015533468,0.0017146082,0.0074049835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14762951,0.00053521525,0.00054735277,0.011136639,0.0036091579,0.008088101,0.0018553388,0.0017554717,0.0018081029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023948392,0.00051010645,0.28957927,0.0014626367,0.0009428832,0.002653953,0.008153694,0.051191587,0.010786427,0.34345838,0.023490498,0.26537573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020678288,0.00043856207,0.21103026,0.00045030098,0.0003438117,0.0049028057,0.003543882,0.10167608,0.01216427,0.62561625,0.03938423,0.00024274572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013634617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011757738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99295586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022277683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012714087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03725356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176225318","doi":"10.1145/3463274.3463359","title":"Towards a More Structured Peer Review Process with Empirical Standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Process management; Empirical research; Peer review; Business; Programming language; Political science","score_opus":0.4179059071787115,"score_gpt":0.6254396821821306,"score_spread":0.20753377500341913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176225318","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008466537,0.0039436733,0.90726477,0.048530594,0.0034703151,0.012567025,0.00016696173,0.0018777448,0.013712359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03794423,0.0014149768,0.9422894,0.005114207,0.0018758621,0.00845051,0.00028507988,0.00030199412,0.0023237152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.18234229,0.61224675,0.04761062,0.028122041,0.12724149,0.0024369345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.084445894,0.39266795,0.080729365,0.15688498,0.26790014,0.017371649],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.66490096,0.00245129,0.0039259195,0.019781187,0.008485331,0.030775122,0.0125985835,0.010609879,0.004877345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7217215,0.0026711838,0.0029821002,0.011177309,0.02160466,0.023505172,0.024711717,0.01871015,0.0060409703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036693658,0.001972328,0.008583817,0.01153228,0.0009439542,0.00067394326,0.039651856,0.0061592744,0.011672464,0.20055237,0.049841303,0.6680495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001177796,0.0022512206,0.016164808,0.01925677,0.00035264078,0.0014451061,0.0159833,0.016353283,0.0075701466,0.44159198,0.4767262,0.001126702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020757637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028683245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33509904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014107258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08482743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4132368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176767185","doi":"10.1177/05390184211019161","title":"Science needs more external evaluation, not less","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Accountability; Reductionism; Democracy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Epistemology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6218952172951284,"score_gpt":0.6203810530267898,"score_spread":0.0015141642683386136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176767185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054883393,0.011494879,0.07529293,0.81212956,0.0077233417,0.00054618454,0.00021649123,0.0007951998,0.086313054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2904203,0.014879889,0.15892638,0.48007298,0.021127984,0.0022770322,0.0008250121,0.0024553046,0.029015115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.64916515,0.20845203,0.017567744,0.017102443,0.101074405,0.0066382736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38293284,0.33583245,0.029947499,0.08038305,0.15408617,0.01681804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26464635,0.0023210393,0.0038982283,0.0073857387,0.0075751077,0.03842688,0.003332837,0.012544507,0.010165261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38962567,0.0011672627,0.0023433063,0.005543526,0.042415053,0.05972309,0.022637052,0.02641537,0.0059555047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021419775,0.00038226193,0.0053498107,0.0025272998,0.00027952937,0.00015002392,0.01109866,0.0014229232,0.0014448623,0.6163298,0.13842084,0.22237985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012801588,0.0002798685,0.003781826,0.006126642,0.0001842546,0.00031892437,0.00840239,0.0014791585,0.0014013028,0.549943,0.427676,0.00027856915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050379247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037951786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73535365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018822396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02857103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90682197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177002457","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.05","title":"The Internationalization of Chinese English-Language Humanities and Social Science Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Chinese language; Social science; Scopus; Library science; Independence (probability theory); Citation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; History; Business; Law; Linguistics; Art; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3766237174427705,"score_gpt":0.5214296935725878,"score_spread":0.14480597612981733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177002457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601949,0.0053463075,0.00027019234,0.0016221779,0.00009438498,0.00003100426,0.0013316523,0.000040820458,0.031068536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954918,0.001974506,0.00018611593,0.000090919304,0.00007585328,0.000016533337,0.00073261646,0.000006380081,0.0014252003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634117,0.0004903652,0.00078697974,0.0004996724,0.0013772892,0.0005044472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97261435,0.0049443496,0.011341121,0.0013649717,0.007104609,0.002630629],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00399396,0.00026882146,0.00037229803,0.019958414,0.0014608246,0.0042457823,0.00059237337,0.0002433131,0.0033578454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017632177,0.00012162466,0.0002358741,0.026354816,0.0013966863,0.003320559,0.0019443867,0.0003385704,0.00037625784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088453606,0.0000517275,0.8813247,0.00046473328,0.000088240944,0.00045347514,0.012451476,0.00021441538,0.000985636,0.008844082,0.002744475,0.0922887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065342538,0.000054285083,0.96831435,0.00013594594,0.00006116459,0.00032171208,0.010302767,0.00037796234,0.0006119213,0.0008654062,0.018927522,0.00002038527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014319804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015921611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99575424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021375073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030174947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0284729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179761068","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04022-w","title":"Who profits from the Canadian nanotechnology reward system? Implications for gender-responsible innovation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Productivity; Gender equality; Work (physics); Gender gap; Field (mathematics); Reward system; Gender disparity; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economic growth; Economics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7142155899698618,"score_gpt":0.5720511809625689,"score_spread":0.14216440900729288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179761068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14588547,0.0058184336,0.0035171108,0.35985732,0.0012553831,0.0001289964,0.0008331931,0.00014012311,0.48256394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510036,0.0019975505,0.0011283498,0.0120527595,0.00023681458,0.000035618443,0.000110827226,0.000059851554,0.033374593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97876465,0.0028397324,0.00033559676,0.0014520736,0.0087582525,0.007849702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451349,0.012540665,0.0028971182,0.0015556682,0.02417748,0.01369415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014820226,0.0004935598,0.0008785571,0.00431645,0.015943427,0.015915716,0.0027649044,0.003710331,0.017806467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476711,0.00030934712,0.00068418274,0.004978477,0.012441413,0.00526575,0.0043127793,0.003977675,0.0009686729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016812685,0.00009288708,0.047730368,0.00021084394,0.00007750806,0.0003960609,0.009663534,0.0011678622,0.0006287774,0.73957247,0.10317412,0.09711747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014819285,0.00008417501,0.19207177,0.001134965,0.00025060071,0.00035833652,0.05336391,0.004408339,0.0016974743,0.22137724,0.5246897,0.00041533564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9659029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99568355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12492411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25488415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181031621","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: McGill 9th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Library science; Computer science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.492068636886433,"score_gpt":0.5428247172731383,"score_spread":0.050756080386705316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181031621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014912755,0.01498823,0.03954872,0.008880444,0.011438194,0.0023621668,0.3556454,0.044716693,0.520929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049799243,0.02087829,0.0903588,0.0025907846,0.002563983,0.004813717,0.24562068,0.020895654,0.60729814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907733,0.0015325263,0.0016118448,0.00045037974,0.0053404486,0.0002915776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95752126,0.011287149,0.0021156282,0.0032648153,0.024747487,0.0010636429],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006306521,0.0021885566,0.0026117903,0.026129568,0.0020671573,0.008984575,0.0039703553,0.0018028506,0.2870273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043975383,0.0019650045,0.0010918269,0.0443982,0.0009648284,0.0072016553,0.0027478691,0.0037220677,0.30932984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015353064,0.000010759991,0.000094356335,0.0004984564,0.000005657472,0.000010279561,0.00006766076,0.00008463397,0.00011854003,0.001870025,0.9492949,0.047929298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086102455,0.000012257869,0.00081589783,0.00035549173,0.0000059233757,0.000041125553,0.00004622865,0.0001245224,0.00016052733,0.0018178426,0.99658597,0.000025487774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02896647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069606334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99101543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038792107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015168257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.960202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182380638","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2021.4032","title":"Stars and Brokers: Knowledge Spillovers Among Medical Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Productivity; Degree (music); Identification (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Entrepreneurship; Star (game theory); Computer science; Industrial organization; Economics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.3401180911245082,"score_gpt":0.5539872394611265,"score_spread":0.2138691483366183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182380638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777013,0.0018412019,0.012098482,0.0013789675,0.000029133906,0.000040945048,0.00031851092,0.00003998294,0.0065514264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855703,0.00017566932,0.0007032813,0.000029554294,0.000034905195,0.0000072211974,0.0000646363,0.0000022332626,0.00042555708],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631304,0.0019428455,0.00022000652,0.00065954326,0.0005746084,0.00028995945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93070924,0.051020943,0.013271233,0.0019151561,0.0010299991,0.0020534168],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006139241,0.00027513193,0.0006850574,0.003077963,0.00066539855,0.0021104678,0.00051731785,0.0008968774,0.0042916546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045970485,0.00024305066,0.00067840476,0.003314744,0.0014171873,0.0028727779,0.002166968,0.00068975874,0.0004086572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009878315,0.00016919446,0.8926252,0.00029186072,0.00079699594,0.00039760076,0.0031235332,0.015603778,0.0017785511,0.025176855,0.0012125451,0.05783615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023276752,0.00090080244,0.85782105,0.00018434107,0.0011075796,0.001095966,0.0036433057,0.06180727,0.0030475904,0.063927464,0.006133652,0.000098117496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024897333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019400174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087440765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006053483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032467782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183736878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3890190","title":"Loss of New Ideas: Potentially Long-lasting Effects of the Pandemic on Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Harvard Business School; Northwestern University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pandemic; Workforce; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Scale (ratio); Demographic economics; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18565149584556434,"score_gpt":0.4804168689104461,"score_spread":0.29476537306488176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183736878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35348904,0.015726905,0.0073732743,0.4406037,0.00449053,0.00011008248,0.0027501194,0.0003136398,0.17514268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96158844,0.004765244,0.0008987687,0.021881819,0.0024321966,0.00007210532,0.00024311425,0.00006214167,0.00805623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962703,0.0013089924,0.00014857211,0.00039685937,0.0009455701,0.00092962844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636323,0.01885365,0.005770547,0.0025813414,0.0033695174,0.005792635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008002225,0.00037596418,0.00074191234,0.0018619081,0.0030179366,0.008549507,0.0013939218,0.00749758,0.029492699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04782328,0.00027500602,0.00061605376,0.0021520476,0.0058112177,0.012711034,0.0058622914,0.006425603,0.0028171462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002088997,0.0008877992,0.09268649,0.0013027072,0.00050605414,0.0035871696,0.014231896,0.0050612125,0.0053928993,0.39247113,0.19365233,0.2881313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025768913,0.00057778304,0.08094908,0.0009776341,0.00016654599,0.0011573599,0.02546247,0.003822085,0.0017373336,0.6902018,0.19442807,0.00026213532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027695706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031019314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99813807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024400163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031734672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09866291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188905274","doi":"10.7202/1081290ar","title":"Les impacts d’une évaluation bibliométrique standardisée : le cas des publications de sciences sociales au sein d’une section universitaire multidisciplinaire","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Valuation (finance); Art; Economics","score_opus":0.7402084679695938,"score_gpt":0.6060275506975462,"score_spread":0.13418091727204762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188905274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6054546,0.024513656,0.11756229,0.04994333,0.0027551502,0.0024711273,0.0070976513,0.002885286,0.18731688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92225033,0.0026690024,0.05830413,0.0016596197,0.0005917977,0.0011654227,0.0023445261,0.00051550707,0.010499643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.55061483,0.2443344,0.02762878,0.014957487,0.15847363,0.0039908867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4397078,0.2812578,0.056268144,0.05329554,0.16530216,0.0041685714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18577145,0.001469487,0.0025051844,0.017832747,0.0042828303,0.020145375,0.0028507323,0.0027245965,0.0067359107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39262193,0.0010052009,0.0024579288,0.033701085,0.0044956924,0.008891603,0.008197368,0.0027350658,0.0023497941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021777432,0.0007494751,0.22497407,0.0061750673,0.003239737,0.00026003184,0.013306033,0.015215559,0.0064612087,0.06581363,0.022036893,0.63959056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065248465,0.0035478342,0.65685236,0.005131749,0.0015800096,0.0004581116,0.019009188,0.02385775,0.02640539,0.035868354,0.22603106,0.00060572487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047980577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03774118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98216724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018235726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029704312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189118421","doi":"10.1017/s1049096521000858","title":"Editor Fatigue: Can Political Science Journals Increase Review Invitation-Acceptance Rates?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.4848384918129678,"score_gpt":0.6170856190753933,"score_spread":0.1322471272624255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189118421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98208606,0.0012259642,0.0024350164,0.004669236,0.0004033654,0.00023794702,0.00094107096,0.000252719,0.007748702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683064,0.00014046144,0.00082881306,0.00045991805,0.00024368642,0.000121497585,0.00028107685,0.000055360142,0.0010384934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9211974,0.042609807,0.008201804,0.0056734136,0.018678758,0.003638796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22801763,0.4825887,0.1930124,0.017129682,0.06453468,0.014716967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056913286,0.00034140196,0.0007003323,0.0034124723,0.0019969256,0.0055165756,0.0012910559,0.0013624409,0.0064192005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52251786,0.0004257263,0.00075010414,0.003383793,0.00148306,0.0026664739,0.001786413,0.001970132,0.0018875656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008385798,0.00021374354,0.960495,0.00037323812,0.00015119351,0.00014303376,0.005222204,0.00025646144,0.0007067614,0.00029075326,0.0062755803,0.025033316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045932906,0.00026034057,0.9911164,0.00011327369,0.000055841225,0.00011156743,0.0023093082,0.0010162967,0.00073077227,0.000401723,0.0037875576,0.000050906554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011729777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013190272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94308674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002562591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047395215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3009898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190211635","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2021.1959183","title":"Violations of Standard Practices by Predatory Economics Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Publishing; China; Poisson regression; Sample (material); Predatory pricing; Geography; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Population","score_opus":0.7551132185371355,"score_gpt":0.6597411787950701,"score_spread":0.09537203974206543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190211635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936702,0.0008425961,0.0004600151,0.0006821619,0.000018094763,0.000032042903,0.000099078956,0.000013975297,0.004181744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985563,0.00044965593,0.00035801774,0.000100019635,0.00003531844,0.0000123695945,0.00008196581,0.0000039676715,0.00040232026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739396,0.008203144,0.0038993969,0.0015571264,0.011363784,0.0010368752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5866949,0.103437304,0.2716185,0.014430967,0.017953306,0.0058650034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009124701,0.00018304813,0.00037879584,0.006207731,0.0012812964,0.003043445,0.00064404367,0.0006459247,0.0020117078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12885195,0.0002698445,0.00026871075,0.007803648,0.0016855364,0.0023574336,0.0024462452,0.0008207693,0.00033783188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006863803,0.00005889551,0.9737012,0.00011640568,0.00006539569,0.000270242,0.0037954124,0.0001064571,0.00045470038,0.0006542511,0.0005424987,0.02016595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054883376,0.00008961389,0.98533756,0.00012595435,0.00003171474,0.000670794,0.0077873818,0.00030410558,0.0005361672,0.0007932732,0.00429617,0.000021954775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036974996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057662055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99935406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016690705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019684753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048256576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194145553","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202120201948","title":"Integration of the elements involved in scientific publication","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Subject (documents); Process (computing); Publishing; Balance (ability); Computer science; Institution; Scientific publishing; Scientific literature; Data science; Political science; Operations research; Library science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.3933854094592221,"score_gpt":0.4981382380784269,"score_spread":0.10475282861920476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194145553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4617185,0.007024353,0.11112464,0.010027599,0.0003482863,0.00075308146,0.00058316963,0.00028789783,0.4081325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674788,0.0013153487,0.017965762,0.00025209453,0.00017423069,0.00021094909,0.00024410084,0.000101127356,0.012257521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95248276,0.018552367,0.0037738644,0.0041361134,0.01751862,0.0035363128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268121,0.03280912,0.011357834,0.009754055,0.016099727,0.0031671315],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016642543,0.000646288,0.0010230859,0.0080259675,0.0034818735,0.02679736,0.0016240824,0.0022476888,0.012881318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06991052,0.0009408457,0.0011240639,0.010451491,0.005418922,0.0193459,0.008200687,0.0028800785,0.002573136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057215686,0.00036573352,0.12920575,0.0010042508,0.0006020981,0.00072405464,0.012261004,0.0057302243,0.0052065956,0.5768367,0.0016569761,0.26583436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008077099,0.000510915,0.19494513,0.0010374915,0.0011690869,0.0012237778,0.013294951,0.013150822,0.005777595,0.6634278,0.10514901,0.0002326147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018400617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015804953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99197406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008420837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067240023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0880152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194997003","doi":"","title":"Requesting Reprints of Scientific Publications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Library science; Developing country; Political science; Business; Accounting; Computer science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.5672636181694728,"score_gpt":0.5410988249342429,"score_spread":0.02616479323522991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194997003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011491995,0.011104812,0.020101003,0.027660178,0.041717447,0.003030593,0.03117521,0.012213505,0.8415052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065219745,0.025009422,0.04068017,0.01070168,0.026678123,0.002213839,0.0452776,0.01055357,0.7736659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810739,0.005653084,0.0031212447,0.00092602894,0.008180107,0.0010456007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8727758,0.06358573,0.0057196827,0.032931004,0.018370476,0.006617302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012834118,0.0014867308,0.0016860691,0.013691738,0.0020298962,0.009345377,0.0014885687,0.0026314724,0.51597065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1383894,0.000843019,0.0012625867,0.023857212,0.0012094175,0.0048346696,0.004675838,0.0026258081,0.5358389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009939813,0.0000940659,0.0012079044,0.0012819079,0.00004073316,0.0005230034,0.00047421324,0.00014845192,0.0027874436,0.0068869693,0.7424031,0.24405289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038262486,0.00008856415,0.0019260515,0.0003470146,0.000018982517,0.0006997311,0.00035271197,0.00020912146,0.0015682242,0.009459857,0.9852572,0.000034290584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040461126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007489192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98716587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010918982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034919477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6904091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195670816","doi":"10.1002/asi.24569","title":"Measuring the citation context of national <scp>self‐references</scp>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Citation; Scholarly communication; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; History; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.3249558079521777,"score_gpt":0.46352632154575574,"score_spread":0.13857051359357803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195670816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89859915,0.0152111985,0.0040881885,0.003142423,0.00053073646,0.00013387464,0.013671566,0.00019447666,0.06442838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881656,0.002396077,0.0018281873,0.00011645777,0.00025634363,0.00009937867,0.0045885732,0.000059397087,0.0024899982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781212,0.006709756,0.0048360694,0.001815485,0.007853512,0.00066397386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70386934,0.15198365,0.07243294,0.014875241,0.05273361,0.00410523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020783497,0.00017311443,0.00082707097,0.034097157,0.001503653,0.006031012,0.0007152038,0.000732294,0.0068515055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17814493,0.00013262483,0.00033199094,0.06757903,0.0014254141,0.0045410693,0.0039318725,0.00055300974,0.0015845833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027279562,0.00009837543,0.76183045,0.0049740532,0.0005453616,0.0006210769,0.01460556,0.0012509384,0.0027397424,0.026572803,0.015403289,0.17108549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018421028,0.000120013,0.8912914,0.0015751472,0.00024270173,0.0006737652,0.0123123005,0.0014736132,0.0034525136,0.009508871,0.07925073,0.00008055647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026223424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004495039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019573066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027174228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10991496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196499916","doi":"10.1177/01655515211040655","title":"Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Social network analysis; Data science; Library science; Cluster analysis; Network analysis; Clustering coefficient; China; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.41183068110362653,"score_gpt":0.566526376102441,"score_spread":0.15469569499881453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196499916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6806717,0.0032713,0.24861032,0.0018873703,0.00019284028,0.0015053921,0.037613895,0.0023539942,0.02389307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8119565,0.0013142828,0.16424151,0.000079053156,0.00011043184,0.0011021601,0.0174577,0.00011503592,0.0036233168],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980724,0.0007072861,0.00018889629,0.00044340765,0.0004431375,0.0001448336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600863,0.002051956,0.0008566193,0.00035343098,0.0004891914,0.00024006906],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029194856,0.00072505686,0.000820722,0.014322913,0.0010735824,0.002325792,0.0007904262,0.00090984587,0.002779887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00787851,0.00026331338,0.001469035,0.015948866,0.00050112075,0.0025637152,0.0019704096,0.0007647878,0.000849399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005147915,0.0006722887,0.33969358,0.003533841,0.0015697927,0.0023319216,0.009228648,0.08238809,0.006293253,0.045261607,0.032542836,0.47596937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009397944,0.00050558546,0.2480766,0.0007761102,0.0006808582,0.002007465,0.010176783,0.5789371,0.006712025,0.06530809,0.08648286,0.00024250158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037200435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036718268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010389849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015716299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015439868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196835254","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.abe4639","title":"The gendered nature of authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Devaluation; Attribution; Power (physics); Injustice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Currency; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.4917747213293212,"score_gpt":0.6104990795276162,"score_spread":0.11872435819829497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196835254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8551071,0.004600896,0.013527617,0.0069426293,0.0004700739,0.00006936261,0.00032052523,0.000029526127,0.118932344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962496,0.00034301527,0.0005509231,0.00021403207,0.000056004304,0.000014103071,0.000023656883,0.0000068881636,0.0025417386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913045,0.0046111103,0.00044191178,0.0008236095,0.0021493516,0.00066952367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671236,0.01988055,0.007173726,0.0020315014,0.0023152225,0.001475304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076392842,0.00020697984,0.0002988122,0.0014296637,0.0017488194,0.0033982561,0.00041865677,0.00036986932,0.007542225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038619373,0.00010912873,0.00017742594,0.0009397016,0.003363128,0.0031455753,0.0019887611,0.00057689374,0.00067312026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040915248,0.00012310118,0.45694768,0.0005691555,0.00012941004,0.0011633028,0.14804873,0.00031274953,0.004641506,0.14764239,0.005156867,0.23485605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051907766,0.00030860413,0.3920197,0.0013040848,0.00007864974,0.0051501417,0.13158803,0.0012513674,0.0042733424,0.28860998,0.1752336,0.00013053308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009707263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015419114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99963015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010849078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040400922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196838655","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.07.005","title":"Predatory Journals- The Power of the Predator Versus the Integrity of the Honest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Aside; Work (physics); Peer review; Public relations; Developing country; Power (physics); Health care; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6444277517032294,"score_gpt":0.5807667156400796,"score_spread":0.06366103606314977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196838655","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050448964,0.95647043,0.00078032113,0.03772588,0.0018764356,0.000016478894,0.000051067036,0.000012663748,0.002562224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025706371,0.9485073,0.0023608217,0.014313094,0.007911952,0.000040446022,0.00008044472,0.000026548154,0.0010529931],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9504024,0.023033485,0.0051674293,0.0025573997,0.018244803,0.00059455255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70130867,0.23002408,0.02429787,0.0075689983,0.033906292,0.0028940763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057592157,0.00072152534,0.0036754066,0.019312827,0.00181287,0.013978675,0.0025329613,0.0050032884,0.004523224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1638984,0.0006633119,0.0010513895,0.025304688,0.0111174565,0.018175485,0.0031456996,0.0047202418,0.0014418798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018261315,0.000060282968,0.0046048793,0.048711214,0.0018323504,0.0002935703,0.001399051,0.0002394711,0.00033303027,0.065212265,0.07625088,0.80088043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010635334,0.00015625535,0.013478407,0.1080154,0.002366045,0.0017001205,0.004005747,0.0007536096,0.00045868862,0.19128083,0.6774817,0.00019679985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003959255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010461521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043778573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014353252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30458003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197222642","doi":"10.1017/pls.2021.23","title":"Tie my hands loosely","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and the Life Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.6056489886481925,"score_gpt":0.5695863811963155,"score_spread":0.03606260745187695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197222642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037476765,0.0049338634,0.047548328,0.4331551,0.06597771,0.0002040321,0.00043850165,0.0022866402,0.44170812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05499316,0.0042120204,0.01877694,0.18220639,0.018980091,0.0003810838,0.00038170905,0.0045866747,0.7154818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98983765,0.0033416862,0.0003522731,0.0018689852,0.002808771,0.0017906342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791062,0.004637212,0.0013246059,0.003255767,0.005552277,0.0061238348],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090720225,0.001954955,0.0012951412,0.0026397465,0.015746485,0.021705518,0.0023648457,0.008809177,0.20106246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06710898,0.0013210356,0.0013717618,0.0014708401,0.0124794,0.022392336,0.018737793,0.020353949,0.22968404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073044685,0.000043769567,0.0005622021,0.00011627399,0.000036107533,0.00041174598,0.00884736,0.00007008926,0.00056899386,0.08781662,0.8424923,0.05896153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010598487,0.00002223345,0.00016016973,0.0003240378,0.000010515428,0.00025945678,0.005375536,0.00007320039,0.00019404969,0.034614954,0.9589216,0.00003362406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031698805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048538437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003229442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041609597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6726209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197628853","doi":"10.17821/srels/2021/v58i4/155744","title":"Newspaper Citations in Scientific Publications Indexed in Web of Science (2001-2010)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SRELS Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Web of science; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.37353395026965686,"score_gpt":0.5135139787103039,"score_spread":0.13998002844064705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197628853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93388927,0.01709037,0.00025884822,0.00042636582,0.00024408127,0.00005098516,0.034433883,0.00006848331,0.013537872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590838,0.010774325,0.0006612554,0.00011407673,0.0006473756,0.0000729062,0.02117952,0.000034070123,0.0074327136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970804,0.00026833784,0.00062034675,0.000290924,0.0014779851,0.00026194588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798922,0.0066037774,0.008921002,0.00042405457,0.0034100807,0.0007489428],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012026981,0.00022874799,0.0003726741,0.025727533,0.00046970975,0.0023343505,0.00035084962,0.00044541134,0.0030798889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014658102,0.00010000276,0.00029603048,0.047877744,0.00032952536,0.0011343661,0.0007255303,0.00039076904,0.0012008883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002917368,0.00011750696,0.8906699,0.002058743,0.0002896705,0.00075347646,0.0023108649,0.00031942545,0.0017276452,0.001270159,0.009595379,0.09059561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040456675,0.000057958176,0.97880447,0.00016668403,0.00010626471,0.00070689543,0.00089702645,0.00017357673,0.00063065585,0.00016818916,0.018269246,0.000014944059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00454439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008004009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010422092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008990446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010303259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197846497","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0119","title":"Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Co-citation; Citation; Dominance (genetics); Specialty; Information science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.286229173528639,"score_gpt":0.5805644529410221,"score_spread":0.2943352794123831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197846497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273605,0.006758481,0.0036677548,0.0017674221,0.00019496537,0.00019883308,0.024665702,0.00017651691,0.0352098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907215,0.0017228216,0.0030543657,0.000047157322,0.00018015566,0.00010863394,0.013858028,0.00004586442,0.0019107725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951434,0.000561543,0.0006832162,0.00054997817,0.0025963925,0.00046557566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771277,0.0077961967,0.0058609955,0.0013296774,0.0068305503,0.001054999],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059396387,0.00043556435,0.0005633171,0.053413972,0.0010955328,0.005485631,0.0006533603,0.00051582983,0.0033779524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026670573,0.00014589791,0.0010073852,0.0709356,0.0009428639,0.0034729524,0.0026147484,0.0007279727,0.00082150596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018628141,0.00010413705,0.82093966,0.00077495136,0.00039027436,0.00033942307,0.0045816223,0.00393235,0.0008055245,0.012910302,0.0088662775,0.14616925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013554853,0.00011789185,0.9466755,0.00036325006,0.00013269027,0.00039888936,0.0045614676,0.008166967,0.0009348965,0.0042847707,0.03430618,0.000043935735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016386755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012338633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040670866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052425954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03258276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197930157","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011","title":"Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7459966553927573,"score_gpt":0.6835811267572081,"score_spread":0.06241552863554922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197930157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021240758,0.062040325,0.071498595,0.8200684,0.026966713,0.0009268363,0.0002773673,0.00050704594,0.015590524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15913516,0.046672054,0.15235935,0.57867736,0.048925437,0.0056127403,0.0003213292,0.00049112376,0.0078054373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.46375838,0.35121843,0.04550344,0.019502696,0.113404244,0.0066127544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13966817,0.67090756,0.033185694,0.034146644,0.111219235,0.010872755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5193402,0.001471605,0.0063206987,0.012390826,0.007902568,0.024819791,0.008602639,0.028476978,0.005042607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.71864945,0.0022262947,0.00386334,0.0068258424,0.027985072,0.03698423,0.022179052,0.028237795,0.0024867118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005703591,0.00011629451,0.002403988,0.011492959,0.0018378278,0.00024770485,0.0026226672,0.001014435,0.00093393546,0.4194372,0.1818019,0.37752068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006715169,0.00021280412,0.0031848873,0.01763385,0.0016151918,0.00048374652,0.0006682059,0.003363661,0.0011611549,0.65256983,0.3181074,0.00032779676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006004805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008394337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48065978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014818389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07045584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5927391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200026842","doi":"10.18438/eblip29913","title":"Do Institutional Repository Deposit Guidelines Deter Data Discovery?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Data element; Sample (material); Meta Data Services; Documentation; Data discovery; Data science; World Wide Web; Metadata repository; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.466706315802476,"score_gpt":0.5217880096438329,"score_spread":0.05508169384135686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200026842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6964903,0.006069012,0.046586182,0.09719183,0.0007623976,0.0034589884,0.0025538474,0.00088751694,0.14599997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95515233,0.0013157312,0.028999403,0.0071872124,0.00037519605,0.0015077131,0.0008646491,0.00016485491,0.004433038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.55218863,0.22803077,0.08185951,0.012809508,0.115809806,0.009301765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14220224,0.52923447,0.18569642,0.059465785,0.076760255,0.0066407807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32319552,0.00039963974,0.0012219895,0.011227593,0.0065604444,0.021200832,0.0058391746,0.0039952067,0.0070192763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6684824,0.0015500026,0.0009208925,0.01910802,0.010412205,0.026434958,0.014709224,0.0026566805,0.0017422364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005997733,0.0005589436,0.5370034,0.0038394353,0.00033004413,0.0006794054,0.03417989,0.0013243997,0.00143421,0.16920727,0.025203263,0.22563994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048093047,0.0013404267,0.40571028,0.009018154,0.00055011467,0.002367227,0.14988425,0.007062013,0.01145194,0.12215833,0.28945702,0.00051931496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008582888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011524326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97879916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013816627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035701197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8346204},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3200417041","doi":"10.2147/amep.s328648","title":"A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Likert scale; Accountability; Computer science; Rubric; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Law","score_opus":0.4751538192648879,"score_gpt":0.6814700343754677,"score_spread":0.2063162151105798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200417041","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32615522,0.0010384049,0.63706553,0.0016515098,0.00018924451,0.024283107,0.0017136281,0.00065670814,0.007246695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5241703,0.0004537879,0.4538885,0.00021681293,0.000039050545,0.019773573,0.0010026839,0.00003898193,0.0004163366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8807541,0.09604508,0.008340803,0.0032866173,0.010569244,0.0010041016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84719455,0.10632175,0.0134085845,0.005533563,0.025529047,0.002012462],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07126395,0.0011221446,0.0018878245,0.01626788,0.001883504,0.0030417615,0.00221715,0.0010691814,0.002778033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18706937,0.0007803481,0.0026378778,0.015854815,0.0016525994,0.00427497,0.0044805845,0.0017707606,0.00040377243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015703174,0.0026809084,0.15978067,0.0049900208,0.0026009392,0.00027807904,0.022815907,0.038461722,0.0013186501,0.026664764,0.0073516318,0.73148644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014608648,0.009979639,0.14977422,0.0031342937,0.0013324217,0.0003783127,0.037951335,0.69935393,0.0023413894,0.07375812,0.020088838,0.00044671458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061854552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004859564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058620195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010394615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37688428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200984547","doi":"10.1007/s11676-021-01388-8","title":"Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Forestry Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nanjing University; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Peer review; Publishing; Process (computing); Scientific publishing; Technical peer review; Psychology; Institution; Odds; Public relations; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.5916902377102353,"score_gpt":0.6295760095093614,"score_spread":0.03788577179912611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200984547","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008535083,0.0050895275,0.00047567906,0.05769459,0.93568796,0.000031793545,0.00001575243,0.00006642035,0.00085297495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080321607,0.004998722,0.0006376562,0.017520856,0.9707574,0.000042235282,0.000018367344,0.00007431946,0.0051471684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680025,0.006087597,0.00544465,0.002363001,0.01659546,0.0015066738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7076205,0.07442316,0.01133995,0.0048752967,0.16044901,0.041292172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052619144,0.0035654674,0.0039563654,0.00661627,0.0068925293,0.027071327,0.004229687,0.021280712,0.007768552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17597036,0.0017608386,0.0023203825,0.002997012,0.0038793448,0.0127799865,0.0038226112,0.024650335,0.0081625115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003395813,0.000022318953,0.00009881168,0.00032931668,0.000020130887,0.0002060764,0.00008892369,0.000031567804,0.000087172564,0.00039420437,0.9818731,0.016814446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007315669,0.000053966698,0.0005709396,0.0008285456,0.00006747684,0.0005601532,0.00033001532,0.0002929828,0.00018798561,0.0030712988,0.99390125,0.000062184634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056901947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94738084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004085698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011910447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27827996},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3201111863","doi":"10.3390/su131810378","title":"Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Scopus; Institution; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Library science; Social science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.32639008186427493,"score_gpt":0.723295831982531,"score_spread":0.3969057501182561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201111863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97754616,0.0088753095,0.00064831483,0.0010198543,0.00007988266,0.00003963517,0.0005960025,0.000022851147,0.011172148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967039,0.0020607607,0.00026374517,0.00005335459,0.000041020816,0.000018107028,0.00024249681,0.000004515714,0.00061205565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463826,0.0013480169,0.0008929906,0.0007317304,0.0016374969,0.00075161643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98071116,0.005871253,0.0057979277,0.0010537107,0.0040361634,0.0025297343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005698202,0.00030052807,0.00059068704,0.011206655,0.0019298309,0.004005864,0.00041960008,0.00045801656,0.0027418751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017519321,0.00015509724,0.00057431305,0.019910691,0.0007514367,0.0023674683,0.003997414,0.00031553794,0.0003207117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011038212,0.00005173683,0.89362645,0.00079305447,0.0003687135,0.000823085,0.01647732,0.0005628672,0.0010856064,0.0038522368,0.0014786136,0.08077003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012993932,0.00006773439,0.9698833,0.00028335556,0.00025066998,0.000422549,0.011953363,0.0013382442,0.00064029754,0.0014679427,0.013641104,0.000038505477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011374463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015145033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021644845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053574108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W320283735","doi":"","title":"The indexing of scholarly open access business journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Information retrieval; Business; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.7499084562366026,"score_gpt":0.6131474332546254,"score_spread":0.13676102298197723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320283735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076267216,0.11754361,0.043353386,0.07795779,0.07069235,0.0034744034,0.04314345,0.007831421,0.62837684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10879844,0.23436135,0.11292021,0.019290421,0.10097833,0.0038290787,0.08035816,0.0062322933,0.3332317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484939,0.009747628,0.011838434,0.0038438274,0.023603646,0.002472579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8260618,0.041084774,0.030931624,0.023855574,0.061078165,0.016988065],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022303617,0.001491562,0.0025080352,0.04537013,0.003909238,0.039046388,0.00392254,0.004373244,0.10562021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13205266,0.0010464491,0.0008892234,0.08826798,0.0072400533,0.020681221,0.00853726,0.0041622557,0.11493075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009836562,0.00011060925,0.0019727328,0.006836737,0.000037665723,0.00023917589,0.0010167259,0.00023658291,0.0020511444,0.1129586,0.4133685,0.46107313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011718767,0.000036121208,0.0027300562,0.002904625,0.000015356183,0.00033915995,0.00035493152,0.00015262765,0.0005556875,0.021098688,0.97176343,0.00003755682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013512546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088295416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053376732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015386703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35333478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203560016","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2021.1226","title":"Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Verb; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Task (project management); Noun; Selection (genetic algorithm); Term (time); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics; History; Management","score_opus":0.2495275361380183,"score_gpt":0.527191449590111,"score_spread":0.2776639134520927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203560016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005352962,0.0870657,0.0418314,0.79281485,0.029073965,0.0007934618,0.0004215784,0.0002207981,0.04242537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2759147,0.092921205,0.06738565,0.5166378,0.02842288,0.0076723523,0.0005690545,0.0007384895,0.0097378455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.44246444,0.4883463,0.03340455,0.0063835257,0.026503313,0.0028977268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29986355,0.6485437,0.026210891,0.009485494,0.014146932,0.001749493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1899539,0.0010042384,0.0030740527,0.011982598,0.0071350997,0.022379946,0.0049701175,0.01924826,0.005129111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4896378,0.0012985521,0.002124407,0.021941511,0.06079832,0.036994435,0.013218449,0.01122465,0.0014416381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008544192,0.000012665144,0.00034416548,0.010140889,0.00011213769,0.00037491688,0.056209113,0.0002110012,0.00018509726,0.83641964,0.07657837,0.019326609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001870999,0.000074808486,0.0005317563,0.06389322,0.00018519736,0.0007795572,0.034629814,0.0009430782,0.00024504444,0.40000522,0.49837008,0.00015509536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063431337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115486905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97762007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017503947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040788703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204012633","doi":"10.1002/leap.1422","title":"Expanding <scp><i>Nature</i></scp>: <scp>Product line</scp> and brand extensions of a scientific journal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Publishing; Product (mathematics); Brand extension; Advertising; Field (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Brand management; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.3334280815092882,"score_gpt":0.48473359850106196,"score_spread":0.15130551699177375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204012633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8196073,0.00086196203,0.006537567,0.002735117,0.000098488206,0.00009515229,0.00027714067,0.000116088755,0.16967112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905738,0.0003249022,0.0024274287,0.00016736276,0.00010231832,0.000019291252,0.00010197979,0.000033455923,0.006249594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983448,0.0004377736,0.00007873731,0.00020474037,0.00078954885,0.0001443799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198354,0.0069908085,0.0043811826,0.0014594739,0.003196192,0.0019888112],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030194505,0.00016610972,0.00015378247,0.0022620943,0.00087919063,0.009540303,0.00043464586,0.00070267584,0.011636981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010403016,0.00015789056,0.00031412634,0.002652044,0.0018846429,0.006167884,0.0018049396,0.000721702,0.0017765454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007138709,0.0011186874,0.30289894,0.0006096188,0.00013481836,0.0012406169,0.009315011,0.0039070984,0.022954885,0.17805277,0.017451273,0.4616024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009388083,0.0010835569,0.6288662,0.00038993722,0.00019031684,0.0022920596,0.017309155,0.018986382,0.018603465,0.10097678,0.211058,0.00015031901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010722976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013979445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020841288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014172669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038929522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204025275","doi":"10.5539/ass.v17n10p63","title":"Announcement of Retraction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Political science; Management; Business; Computer science; Economics; Library science","score_opus":0.5017406114427908,"score_gpt":0.5929002190179083,"score_spread":0.09115960757511754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204025275","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030884298,0.0015730321,0.00044680102,0.10458554,0.8794764,0.00016081017,0.00077135314,0.0006213431,0.012055877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007954174,0.0055071237,0.0023007835,0.17169268,0.5221741,0.0008576792,0.0025455041,0.0015502633,0.28541768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98238087,0.0035498263,0.0028069818,0.0012157836,0.008499348,0.0015472368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918606,0.021802604,0.005445742,0.0058550453,0.04079326,0.007497271],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0160544,0.0022725963,0.0019547597,0.003861848,0.0037618736,0.010274313,0.0032744731,0.013690643,0.1393833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16361107,0.0008512974,0.0031444363,0.0021909478,0.0021674444,0.0038934723,0.0038413047,0.015129044,0.11377748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029930996,0.0000076058714,0.000030884967,0.0001200519,0.000007755653,0.000121483004,0.000023563722,0.000010081131,0.000054641405,0.00044494972,0.99263024,0.0065188133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033855027,0.000036808844,0.00029010882,0.0003624265,0.000013578019,0.00023266433,0.00007855016,0.000071256654,0.00015086861,0.00089254964,0.99781823,0.000019202114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013525061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015129909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98630935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036563165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007706754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46628362},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3204582724","doi":"10.1038/s42254-021-00379-2","title":"The spectrum of early career physics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Reviews Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Spectrum (functional analysis); Physics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.7098016814886061,"score_gpt":0.6283497836085045,"score_spread":0.08145189788010165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204582724","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013006672,0.99529904,0.00018537688,0.002172198,0.00027466306,0.0000031429815,0.000029696443,0.000009996551,0.0018959315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002492496,0.9950965,0.00023923446,0.0011916179,0.00064855337,0.000008711821,0.000035135436,0.0000031699944,0.00028461727],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982526,0.00056699687,0.00015523614,0.0002340732,0.0006901559,0.00010096573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079263,0.0066746343,0.0005820074,0.00022581631,0.0013040898,0.0004208405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041430946,0.0008432299,0.0015758817,0.009536231,0.0005863201,0.003959595,0.0013029601,0.0020186806,0.0042657056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010353558,0.00039501596,0.0007722839,0.007594994,0.0020887733,0.005398547,0.002076306,0.003656541,0.0014981113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093373834,0.000043433756,0.00073319784,0.017429058,0.00021418273,0.00010938591,0.00016520954,0.00026509172,0.00045196197,0.038787387,0.03192137,0.9097864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022302995,0.000051610372,0.004243522,0.02285062,0.00020613262,0.00071944506,0.00023279498,0.00013235863,0.00025410953,0.04349389,0.92775977,0.00003346796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025113774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038684555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027197485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046391767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021911025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204700156","doi":"10.5539/hes.v11n4p40","title":"Requirements for Productivity in the Academic Environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Marketing; Function (biology); Business; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8597340110017595,"score_gpt":0.676593039024524,"score_spread":0.18314097197723556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204700156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6016299,0.00183303,0.038307037,0.02317024,0.00031930185,0.0009978483,0.00087295816,0.00044434416,0.33242527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98260397,0.00041513453,0.010726605,0.0005432276,0.00010508505,0.00043060014,0.0002117909,0.00004472269,0.004918917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612879,0.014450607,0.004151294,0.0019653414,0.013077066,0.005067798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85059905,0.060125228,0.02965817,0.009826042,0.029480683,0.0203108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019504957,0.0003902607,0.00058798696,0.0024745667,0.0032991248,0.010277576,0.0014141122,0.0017589955,0.008516467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08666629,0.00040707766,0.00065696146,0.0025499286,0.003107272,0.0055045895,0.006169664,0.0014500237,0.0025432948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083463104,0.0018218033,0.21815442,0.0029861748,0.00019696324,0.0019497336,0.017562006,0.009494258,0.011461307,0.40662634,0.02539869,0.3035137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023831711,0.0013238273,0.42821288,0.001572404,0.00011139986,0.0024546601,0.031736486,0.00930358,0.0072818254,0.23910378,0.2783425,0.00031831194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001498025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019546007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99752545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050359988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010683315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10315329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204757706","doi":"10.47622/9782954099477_1","title":"Transformer l’excellence en recherche Robert Tijssen, Matthew L. Wallace et Robert McLean","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"African Minds and par Halfa eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Management; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5334396614989456,"score_gpt":0.52021813400455,"score_spread":0.013221527494395646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204757706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011882158,0.12278642,0.030819396,0.07468697,0.008762286,0.0000926125,0.00021200727,0.0007878533,0.7606642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0257137,0.07352624,0.01733045,0.0073850537,0.002850418,0.000089024405,0.00018221592,0.0007388453,0.872184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635625,0.0010969386,0.00012579179,0.00039971573,0.0017867855,0.00023463847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972154,0.0014511145,0.0001380471,0.00022181903,0.00079296576,0.00018069724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045205886,0.0006961802,0.0005973923,0.0025248204,0.0024136594,0.00972578,0.0008329096,0.0026011274,0.022425948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064982423,0.0005818218,0.00049578707,0.0027546003,0.0057156216,0.011633037,0.0024002495,0.0049427035,0.015117581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018818162,0.0000129758355,0.00005977537,0.00012755461,0.000004970341,0.000031559215,0.00093317527,0.00020713359,0.00033034795,0.6729739,0.25433967,0.070960194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038954927,0.000005610146,0.00006235499,0.00012317687,0.000002692707,0.000056459652,0.00017498284,0.00012090667,0.0002789514,0.0460101,0.95315266,0.000008117533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00886729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011844154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005408218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053691547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07502228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205355219","doi":"10.1002/pra2.525","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Annual Meeting Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Information science; Library science; Social media; China; Point (geometry); Bibliometrics; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07438405260671334,"score_gpt":0.40906504944345917,"score_spread":0.33468099683674585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205355219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6896336,0.037428,0.0062108617,0.0062894863,0.0021699804,0.00056293386,0.07434484,0.00093337666,0.18242699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94135463,0.0132353185,0.004637353,0.00021184777,0.0014677256,0.00041374433,0.028138753,0.00015171747,0.010388981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822681,0.002620994,0.002862898,0.00091029826,0.010802382,0.0005352843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428455,0.0188618,0.012210103,0.002733452,0.021500656,0.0018484547],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009521699,0.00051082147,0.0009018046,0.092593685,0.001867558,0.005781452,0.0009964501,0.0006507104,0.0062131993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06544702,0.00019834716,0.00085413276,0.1433061,0.000478915,0.0032025427,0.0016277016,0.00058725575,0.0027736484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026283867,0.0002737999,0.49706194,0.00413223,0.0009795418,0.0005788917,0.0036251002,0.0017382725,0.0021183342,0.008705436,0.10616709,0.37435654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020710719,0.00013240614,0.8128063,0.00076224277,0.0004516109,0.00077529333,0.004716564,0.004232988,0.0017241602,0.0021860604,0.17211054,0.000080981954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005875498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00734696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90740633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024518927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038492135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05035615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205946365","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2021.1976388","title":"Historical roots and influential publications in the area of innovation in the creative industries: A cited-references analysis using the Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Regional science; Social science; Sociology; Library science; History; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5234339764198489,"score_gpt":0.48641400702945736,"score_spread":0.03701996939039154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205946365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8816623,0.055650875,0.015444432,0.0013565022,0.00054706016,0.00032553705,0.00988659,0.00021076683,0.034915905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96306264,0.016636603,0.011230874,0.00012273525,0.00049462356,0.00026451013,0.005319873,0.00009122432,0.00277696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233985,0.0012983736,0.0011205116,0.0008598667,0.003977022,0.0004044246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8954309,0.07054751,0.014745562,0.002827211,0.015078741,0.001370099],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009695753,0.00046043843,0.0007977266,0.08197398,0.0016790031,0.0050724004,0.0009058517,0.0007595718,0.0033153915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05860743,0.0002378352,0.0009803463,0.1152859,0.0013798986,0.004111509,0.0024044262,0.0006846054,0.00088113715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040661686,0.00015246111,0.61992013,0.006619749,0.0012419116,0.0032387096,0.02272668,0.0013680519,0.003993487,0.026659656,0.007797081,0.30587545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004997349,0.00024174046,0.835711,0.0031046811,0.0022719488,0.0030750888,0.02483057,0.004903445,0.0041915975,0.013841813,0.107580215,0.00019786417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003500385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004197693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91802603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012561585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00236181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051276684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206436161","doi":"","title":"The research enterprise at Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College","funders":"","keywords":"Chiropractic; Library science; Web of science; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.6755944260562935,"score_gpt":0.5529896964344321,"score_spread":0.12260472962186142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206436161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.368795,0.07944877,0.0048103924,0.043061726,0.00093317585,0.002958752,0.08444794,0.0010955629,0.41444874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87217385,0.044994723,0.022218673,0.0018873874,0.000453124,0.00091618,0.015508947,0.00014203606,0.04170512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97814775,0.0029491887,0.0020166724,0.0016198625,0.013738179,0.0015283113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934845,0.015899176,0.00899606,0.0019087747,0.027511675,0.010839391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012467095,0.00037536863,0.0006883197,0.030959416,0.0075987866,0.009807163,0.0014838312,0.00083472277,0.016404402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050714605,0.00033084623,0.00045144034,0.065590516,0.0017534697,0.0023784903,0.0027031759,0.00050530746,0.0024655473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029669522,0.00010114822,0.20218049,0.011307983,0.00023310939,0.00078867556,0.0126732895,0.0005306557,0.0020610094,0.023629421,0.11688034,0.62931716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023171402,0.0001478305,0.44244888,0.003919886,0.00024610764,0.0006936905,0.013618901,0.0005543964,0.0015090852,0.001857154,0.5348984,0.00008252525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6649194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7637876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050134882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18572602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6741079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206699948","doi":"10.1126/science.aaa7008","title":"Eureka! <b>Flight from Wonder</b> An Investigation of Scientific Creativity <i>Albert Rothenberg</i> Oxford University Press, 2015. 221 pp. <b>The Creativity Crisis</b> Reinventing Science to Unleash Possibility <i>Roberta B. Ness</i> Oxford University Press, 2015. 287 pp.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Wonder; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2394583296694348,"score_gpt":0.42418220003977525,"score_spread":0.18472387037034044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206699948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011865174,0.78507245,0.002250858,0.11281015,0.017715037,0.0000137814495,0.0014787904,0.00021833138,0.07925415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03182995,0.5327314,0.0058160834,0.01769075,0.013108436,0.00006099226,0.0024436538,0.000852251,0.3954665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896073,0.00022296318,0.0000936275,0.00015596498,0.00045742618,0.000109289314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975063,0.0012002005,0.00034642997,0.00015245151,0.0005090098,0.0002855624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460253,0.0008585344,0.0009580837,0.0022307616,0.0008239175,0.0073583405,0.0007895247,0.0022667118,0.056535784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004713747,0.00047680188,0.0006971389,0.004343601,0.0019169005,0.008505354,0.001915889,0.0030484076,0.028180476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091088994,0.000018080662,0.00029746976,0.000602677,0.000029921055,0.00007396695,0.00017257767,0.00014732633,0.0004383122,0.039031506,0.85940766,0.09968934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008947,0.000007786406,0.0013266716,0.00063671765,0.0000075583544,0.00009084088,0.00017441789,0.00006950585,0.00030770426,0.020648288,0.97670937,0.000012182991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027175352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049295975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025946703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024280732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18913102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206744719","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0103","title":"Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McMaster University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Accountability; Currency; Public relations; Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7432291543368634,"score_gpt":0.5939616039626232,"score_spread":0.14926755037424022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206744719","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16532718,0.007685843,0.47098476,0.14714888,0.0010046508,0.0028518215,0.00014022051,0.00092692237,0.20392977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746935,0.0016153011,0.21144722,0.003061162,0.00019414906,0.0010791146,0.00009048648,0.000120796176,0.007698322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88974357,0.08055171,0.0066556768,0.005202724,0.012952161,0.004894114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83990306,0.10042558,0.019065365,0.015000144,0.015927719,0.009678126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09744801,0.0014908627,0.0010839733,0.0072010835,0.013439037,0.035340924,0.006635195,0.008492519,0.0039450247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13787311,0.0011161276,0.0013886932,0.006187431,0.03327582,0.022047095,0.018795071,0.006146554,0.0012342322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017415076,0.00033478474,0.015676014,0.0011067695,0.00018633131,0.00058125897,0.08887819,0.0025062766,0.0014160105,0.57932436,0.0068439227,0.30297184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009691181,0.0001458141,0.003284994,0.00095765723,0.00009666305,0.0004552818,0.069625854,0.005108043,0.0020747888,0.85404414,0.06400509,0.000104783845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023809422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034583996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01060456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033020616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5153605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207415295","doi":"10.3998/jep.153","title":"What Are the Characteristics of Canadian Independent, Scholarly Journals? Results from a Website Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electronic Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Subject (documents); Dominance (genetics); Impact factor; Library science; Portrait; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; History; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.3340776664748603,"score_gpt":0.4676257342216869,"score_spread":0.1335480677468266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207415295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525391,0.0022344482,0.00051926996,0.0029102305,0.0000900535,0.00020431398,0.0061879857,0.00007776391,0.035236903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890805,0.0017863644,0.001364431,0.00040156743,0.000067254594,0.00008007938,0.0032784545,0.0000632098,0.0038781785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848631,0.0010911846,0.0010222351,0.0012203172,0.010109763,0.0016934106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8638191,0.025617067,0.022757221,0.0032478494,0.07076205,0.013796687],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075419177,0.00053935597,0.0008339027,0.029440703,0.009761339,0.014236479,0.002355789,0.001103395,0.0043752682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06847993,0.0004634479,0.0009927691,0.054403048,0.0038146353,0.0032564155,0.0038761143,0.0011972927,0.0008922576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018905124,0.00008849489,0.8797723,0.0005850977,0.00014096445,0.0006506326,0.05801642,0.00016324675,0.00091615185,0.0035826645,0.008034785,0.04786021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072965445,0.000032958484,0.9198404,0.00019023287,0.00008271999,0.00030307623,0.061081573,0.00029887757,0.00027535384,0.00042052893,0.017397627,0.00006931462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90203464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93731296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98576355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03792725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073095575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27518278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207707709","doi":"10.1002/ece3.8154","title":"Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Information retrieval; Consistency (knowledge bases); Search engine; Scopus; World Wide Web; Transparency (behavior); Scientific literature; Data science; Systematic review; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.49750914401219093,"score_gpt":0.5504804170143308,"score_spread":0.052971273002139885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207707709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71884096,0.10901628,0.12187453,0.0043800278,0.0007862699,0.009041323,0.006408132,0.0017029832,0.027949592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510353,0.0059183156,0.035856478,0.00044545523,0.00027419146,0.0031604741,0.002235956,0.0005625115,0.0005112712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.28312576,0.45627525,0.12504187,0.028495995,0.10371554,0.0033456879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.056772914,0.7833649,0.07319394,0.056578983,0.029218966,0.0008703028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.46163902,0.0014692477,0.004108733,0.039123546,0.002361145,0.009368954,0.004342318,0.0022045516,0.0031359014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8322092,0.0017647874,0.007999081,0.03993739,0.008281759,0.01411086,0.013835228,0.0020448917,0.00066641934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010224456,0.00047053772,0.4412794,0.043557487,0.050043516,0.0020537565,0.060032725,0.0053261025,0.0041917716,0.01887377,0.0053691682,0.35857725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018522225,0.007403847,0.72518075,0.026856776,0.045050062,0.0098647745,0.03525094,0.018652799,0.010287127,0.06255226,0.055834826,0.001213572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021522145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033097742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96087646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052753203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058243205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66389495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207753986","doi":"10.1093/jas/skab235.135","title":"140 Past and Future Changes in Scientific Publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Dissemination; Public relations; Political science; Scientific progress; Best practice; Scientific literature; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Library science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.448412155490907,"score_gpt":0.5313907046262382,"score_spread":0.08297854913533115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207753986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029566037,0.1171621,0.0034884552,0.7593139,0.026968936,0.000058998525,0.0010463645,0.00037828388,0.062016927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5098751,0.26257914,0.021835642,0.1017036,0.0584536,0.00017433643,0.0024960348,0.00065663806,0.042225827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96899635,0.009413574,0.004297234,0.003261436,0.011647494,0.00238396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8497642,0.04905948,0.016587226,0.00833701,0.058991928,0.017260144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043880846,0.00040263357,0.0008154647,0.007101342,0.0038430586,0.026425079,0.0024334963,0.0057229516,0.012875844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10126806,0.0005453699,0.0010396092,0.015690882,0.007212939,0.018571422,0.0038411056,0.0072356747,0.0038345687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025669666,0.0001357223,0.012485282,0.0028009336,0.000100934245,0.00045409473,0.006193763,0.00083046284,0.0012847539,0.40454006,0.20154485,0.36937246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017534541,0.0000675709,0.012070229,0.0013785029,0.000020912137,0.0003835205,0.0043914584,0.00033352565,0.00047393882,0.03748598,0.94330215,0.000074673146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051108627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004734917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99289864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017115975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017421838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23206687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207822332","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.03","title":"Author Choice of Journal Type Based on Income Level of Country","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Waiver; Scopus; Publishing; Sample (material); Economics; Business; Political science; Public economics; Advertising; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7512362361493289,"score_gpt":0.5689153115632962,"score_spread":0.18232092458603266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207822332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91988176,0.008552044,0.0040552546,0.002814753,0.00077025365,0.00032537515,0.004804342,0.00021906699,0.058577154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97957534,0.0029030733,0.0044746413,0.00077443937,0.00019170939,0.00023637644,0.0012979273,0.00013804478,0.010408414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899238,0.003974281,0.0012899253,0.0010750003,0.0023987405,0.0013382168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8914039,0.06459661,0.01827142,0.005452036,0.012935792,0.0073402324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077188737,0.00031816846,0.00096223137,0.0053602625,0.0011926891,0.005193141,0.00071848294,0.00059443375,0.018226188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06732492,0.0003350788,0.0007525392,0.008344956,0.00069865404,0.0022058496,0.0015609859,0.0005629969,0.008894907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002051911,0.00042568982,0.855867,0.001135279,0.00057654746,0.0017068223,0.0047965962,0.00041307544,0.004355887,0.006432288,0.015384389,0.10685439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004379397,0.0009297658,0.8767253,0.0015405278,0.00067184033,0.0062597594,0.021889323,0.0018140258,0.0058449847,0.014941656,0.06870921,0.00023556949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005363296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001209884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99463975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042157026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011027656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06097263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209040456","doi":"10.1080/14703297.2021.1997784","title":"Why is the proposal alone not sufficient for grant success? Building research fundability through collaborative research networking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovations in Education and Teaching International","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Funding Agency; Sociology; Work (physics); Experiential learning; Principal (computer security); Political science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.6178911184170436,"score_gpt":0.6523647550410882,"score_spread":0.03447363662404457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209040456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5261181,0.00302983,0.055373494,0.21246745,0.001534924,0.0019588459,0.00029942743,0.00091114384,0.19830678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98020256,0.0006155858,0.010127805,0.0017158242,0.0002424604,0.00079421804,0.00006306846,0.00017060034,0.0060679126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.83028775,0.1043856,0.0067397826,0.007501452,0.03593718,0.015148245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51504445,0.29566458,0.036004502,0.048700716,0.048557505,0.05602821],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23776753,0.00040276174,0.0012736759,0.0042493055,0.012973446,0.033446196,0.004438529,0.0039334637,0.009323142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45181414,0.00076709903,0.0007743196,0.0060098562,0.021088582,0.021367623,0.019581076,0.006094996,0.002871725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005051117,0.0005589552,0.07357753,0.0008683272,0.00019253945,0.0011213769,0.12748316,0.0015140083,0.0029036084,0.36084363,0.028112542,0.40231925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037715296,0.00090175035,0.0647976,0.0014126056,0.00017764734,0.0011383625,0.1973807,0.0041202134,0.0030321702,0.3540363,0.37224376,0.00038175774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015557474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013624648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019696759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07296933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93996835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209486148","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3821955","title":"Cooperative Non-APC Publishing Models: Canada, Europe and Latin America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Publishing; Political science; Geography; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4031000725801777,"score_gpt":0.3970653542631745,"score_spread":0.006034718317003196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209486148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05035429,0.07149795,0.005192038,0.119637474,0.0014102673,0.00026478583,0.0021633783,0.0007827148,0.74869716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52207893,0.082899846,0.013229847,0.010878207,0.0005434099,0.0002799595,0.0031242908,0.00073073147,0.3662349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921638,0.00073184737,0.0002912651,0.0004721657,0.0040627276,0.002278171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825172,0.0028100875,0.00077294064,0.0008324378,0.0089793615,0.0040879627],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00827055,0.0004878899,0.0004898443,0.0057584937,0.011241078,0.018080316,0.0024893377,0.00195151,0.013828281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01189891,0.00038963617,0.0004447637,0.02238987,0.0053600413,0.0059872675,0.0052134343,0.0021248327,0.0013847458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023704086,0.00013665015,0.010562614,0.0007048518,0.000042325642,0.0008029408,0.018772602,0.0009336905,0.0005905573,0.3753115,0.22666126,0.36524397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022226528,0.000015721635,0.012099103,0.0003870703,0.000019762254,0.0001669852,0.013959677,0.00036779742,0.00039624146,0.0075445287,0.9649758,0.000045065735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95910573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112348914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20927623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8151522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210250846","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006982","title":"Where there is no local author: a network bibliometric analysis of authorship parasitism among research conducted in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Demography; Logistic regression; Geography; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.5922082235936061,"score_gpt":0.6276499925007252,"score_spread":0.03544176890711903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210250846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824264,0.008098221,0.0024371292,0.0006602693,0.000033941833,0.00017846806,0.002627659,0.000041924406,0.0034958902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538726,0.001989516,0.001677441,0.000022384433,0.000024992603,0.00007937658,0.0007175996,0.0000070040737,0.0000944373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906538,0.0032025615,0.0023703647,0.0011174722,0.0022756453,0.00038006756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8985718,0.05785296,0.035352554,0.0021163712,0.0049207713,0.001185522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009768417,0.0003857391,0.00080264173,0.049160734,0.001053887,0.003631974,0.0006395571,0.00047269085,0.0017079756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08061463,0.00021836445,0.0011432524,0.06097922,0.0008945432,0.0033408073,0.0028866231,0.00027270423,0.00017872623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012200627,0.000017933598,0.96233314,0.0019237899,0.0010639142,0.00030776186,0.0034637894,0.00052699976,0.000404263,0.000758626,0.000613659,0.028463999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001601647,0.00006456115,0.9762782,0.0013104641,0.0012974963,0.0012272462,0.0091248145,0.00341248,0.00042669164,0.0020193176,0.0047880234,0.000034669327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004225568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053224927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99952734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013987282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017816342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051660895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211057370","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0257340","title":"How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.8976549043358827,"score_gpt":0.6462692179259985,"score_spread":0.25138568640988423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211057370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027545,0.004578493,0.006533104,0.015108194,0.00022714015,0.00018803676,0.0005267821,0.00010401029,0.069979675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995235,0.0009803384,0.0014406001,0.00081549847,0.00006348931,0.000023978206,0.000097417476,0.000023212122,0.0013205275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722701,0.008129722,0.001956859,0.0013644892,0.013561715,0.0027171948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92119944,0.027016029,0.015681056,0.0039126407,0.022527926,0.009662924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01761843,0.00028064195,0.00064168544,0.009260022,0.0040362924,0.017677505,0.0011592308,0.0010521349,0.001663431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11000263,0.00021632861,0.000350607,0.010455782,0.00923539,0.006817853,0.003344275,0.0010722704,0.00048793963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021019069,0.000223631,0.640247,0.00043321642,0.00034848865,0.00014888102,0.09050173,0.0012405694,0.0023329288,0.03821688,0.010378481,0.21571808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049178827,0.00025358878,0.7376425,0.000788117,0.00015181582,0.00024670028,0.15382911,0.001538974,0.0022771386,0.053783953,0.04914619,0.000292667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123536736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19820487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014985622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024559295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24563533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213872850","doi":"10.22541/au.163256404.42523919/v1","title":"Can I Afford to Publish? A Dilemma for African Scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"Bahir Dar University; National Research Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Dilemma; Open access publishing; Payment; Open access journal; Business model; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Advertising; Law; Marketing; Finance; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.698715707931167,"score_gpt":0.5942933009786275,"score_spread":0.10442240695253946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213872850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025040954,0.009141968,0.0013932899,0.9591393,0.0042119636,0.000029914498,0.00004233379,0.000042296986,0.023494879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2914991,0.05168052,0.012188717,0.5384147,0.042904355,0.000615028,0.00016981283,0.0006040395,0.06192372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9176901,0.048038058,0.00519878,0.0049855434,0.018318769,0.0057687284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6384491,0.24980442,0.018832881,0.019702781,0.023466852,0.04974399],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1091121,0.00082179374,0.0021800273,0.005800189,0.01812262,0.044410583,0.004546643,0.021828506,0.025012698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32993034,0.0013296208,0.0012632891,0.0128132375,0.034171518,0.064650185,0.026193235,0.021990066,0.013254005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001593534,0.00014985313,0.0031114856,0.0011409264,0.00009064585,0.0012821542,0.031523507,0.00023160258,0.00045826667,0.41291982,0.39940894,0.1495235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061032642,0.00006219463,0.0006158153,0.0018043263,0.000025852412,0.00090852083,0.023895847,0.0001747415,0.00018997176,0.2866712,0.6855087,0.000081766404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026976243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020668309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056610946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027007122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5770469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213994457","doi":"10.54590/pop.2021.010","title":"Beyond the Grey Zone: Organization Research Publishing and Bibliodiversity in the Research Communication System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Government (linguistics); Terminology; Grey literature; Sociology; Commons; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.9020949079957455,"score_gpt":0.6369403121597293,"score_spread":0.2651545958360162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213994457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0896906,0.037070494,0.050374724,0.13282435,0.0018089653,0.00022150583,0.000120223274,0.00024941293,0.68763965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664402,0.008563723,0.006320317,0.0035149422,0.0017016144,0.0001592989,0.00004625299,0.00013785619,0.013115774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96266437,0.025192896,0.001705544,0.001733737,0.0061390065,0.0025644582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90990233,0.068887115,0.0072557633,0.0064838785,0.004081561,0.003389269],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026512168,0.0004849921,0.0010982262,0.011565756,0.013781631,0.05090576,0.0019019544,0.005867349,0.007709117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045462478,0.0005148064,0.0006652073,0.016262151,0.09876907,0.034735143,0.020075686,0.0049082767,0.0013540494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013697583,0.000010547348,0.00065876375,0.00012891635,0.0000072385506,0.00014367167,0.04322136,0.000133608,0.00006994076,0.94361764,0.0011214993,0.010873122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021619915,0.000056619632,0.0020640534,0.00095973315,0.000020882484,0.00038014218,0.038455464,0.000570256,0.00025307274,0.7860447,0.17113088,0.000042554504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037819615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021354386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98843426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014066127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015160814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1402114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213999030","doi":"10.54590/pop.2020.010","title":"Where Lie the Similarities and Differences?: A Comparison of University and Industry Partners in Collaboration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Promotion (chess); Foundation (evidence); Public relations; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.8266417858905243,"score_gpt":0.6009712977385953,"score_spread":0.22567048815192903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213999030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434712,0.0026153212,0.0023977894,0.0034582345,0.00009601252,0.000138578,0.00009231215,0.000019178307,0.047711395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997894,0.00073187187,0.00037352578,0.00019428058,0.000012745101,0.00006030051,0.000041095656,0.0000122547635,0.00068004476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94700444,0.035515018,0.0028075553,0.0018102926,0.008294485,0.0045682336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95794547,0.02576402,0.0052359086,0.0015076898,0.0043406994,0.0052061826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030489717,0.0002018342,0.00070889003,0.007263606,0.0076766554,0.019247107,0.0012385042,0.0016608476,0.0037055395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07435239,0.00034842017,0.0005253534,0.010206501,0.0065095467,0.0150826415,0.021114165,0.0015746857,0.00060191395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030079676,0.00014352627,0.108871505,0.0003801753,0.0001130646,0.00082089833,0.7835889,0.00013945525,0.0004459352,0.033790607,0.0016837766,0.06972148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037372585,0.00013355805,0.037853274,0.00034253582,0.00003558459,0.0004940646,0.93849015,0.000264214,0.00014791917,0.007164049,0.015000876,0.000036426933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052356194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009139389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004388943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008118348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16124696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214611157","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0100","title":"Self-promotion and the need to be first in science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Scholarship; Hubris; Humility; Promotion (chess); Subject (documents); Perception; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; History; Library science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.4928738921490908,"score_gpt":0.54328017512846,"score_spread":0.05040628297936928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214611157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74956656,0.02488841,0.01653356,0.085326605,0.0020463495,0.00022542315,0.0007502755,0.0002107655,0.120452136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882245,0.0028396726,0.0040892167,0.0020919591,0.0007990766,0.00006215196,0.000106536485,0.000031067757,0.0017557278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460761,0.02783159,0.0061001233,0.0029196853,0.015223608,0.0018488757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57774806,0.24902819,0.09956406,0.03016412,0.026523758,0.016971858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0616509,0.0002355388,0.00070391846,0.009485677,0.004389885,0.0108098695,0.0010565781,0.0021156983,0.004630342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23390573,0.00042654847,0.00045475483,0.012584777,0.014071041,0.01197168,0.006319677,0.002816451,0.0007219906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058649766,0.0002391288,0.44626716,0.0042858436,0.00033950194,0.00082483195,0.07943568,0.00034368018,0.0035731362,0.1663397,0.018129867,0.279635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007226129,0.00045331812,0.5005499,0.0031000124,0.0002494252,0.0033643565,0.062916994,0.000870182,0.0036349331,0.19617763,0.22834009,0.00027090503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015936458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036023157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99051434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032931156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005927528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32604504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215759634","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3001133","title":"A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Index (typography); Editorial board; Publication bias; Bibliometrics; Sample (material); Library science; Impact factor; Biology; Sample size determination; MEDLINE; Statistics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7609695499606459,"score_gpt":0.6070434092038378,"score_spread":0.1539261407568081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215759634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99128133,0.001373521,0.0013089199,0.0002877957,0.000058580878,0.0003392963,0.002075137,0.000103400154,0.0031720134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873882,0.0007905219,0.0076493854,0.00020656917,0.00029802235,0.0005548359,0.0022020123,0.000033147116,0.0008774217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792291,0.0066163577,0.004988774,0.0024274073,0.006107124,0.0006312391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70736754,0.116811156,0.12611553,0.010960806,0.032176897,0.0065680724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0236155,0.00046470246,0.0008028521,0.018794961,0.0011844853,0.0021103101,0.0007246724,0.0006665175,0.0019234786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1197363,0.00030839187,0.00051673455,0.011321598,0.0008318686,0.0017839243,0.0013926751,0.00034648474,0.001024816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004264057,0.00010974444,0.9552986,0.00083804154,0.00022107885,0.00031154676,0.003452938,0.00012688857,0.0032237328,0.00021921244,0.0021319422,0.033639792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023763976,0.00029024316,0.99107474,0.000088592795,0.00006592926,0.00081608014,0.0014412851,0.00093539146,0.00067058724,0.00025586062,0.0043053688,0.00003229137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007834761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013369961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000735166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013553919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124892175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217143876","doi":"10.29173/jchla29579","title":"Canadian Academics’ use of predatory journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Université de Montréal; Brock University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Concordia University; York University; University of Regina; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.1508158728773931,"score_gpt":0.43490553393300224,"score_spread":0.2840896610556092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217143876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42546695,0.14559636,0.0019978236,0.09393789,0.004157368,0.0004678005,0.019522412,0.000833264,0.3080201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92496437,0.049366143,0.0019797457,0.0060908245,0.0008530613,0.000087551474,0.0022403335,0.00016225348,0.014255741],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97374845,0.0029624722,0.0015413681,0.0017224262,0.017501539,0.00252361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7631356,0.0488135,0.04952717,0.007684383,0.09665345,0.034185886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013091099,0.0005402865,0.0007517486,0.0232604,0.009654994,0.014039858,0.0032522562,0.0015678357,0.01196328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09990229,0.0004358451,0.00060377124,0.04366943,0.0047266684,0.0038233248,0.0052585197,0.0011875564,0.00148306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003704958,0.00008771014,0.27922347,0.011049967,0.00047687022,0.0037661334,0.12130208,0.00041458316,0.0025808557,0.03732948,0.2138461,0.32955238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044110555,0.00009590052,0.36325613,0.0055894717,0.00023381699,0.0018912761,0.06253701,0.00029085105,0.0008842184,0.0030217476,0.5619312,0.00022417239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8081134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84635836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99843216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040886056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14283854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217700596","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0117","title":"Versioning boundary objects: the citation profile of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Object (grammar); Originality; Software versioning; Boundary object; Citation; Boundary (topology); Data science; Discipline; Information retrieval; Scheme (mathematics); Mental mapping; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Mathematics; Software","score_opus":0.18428457107534696,"score_gpt":0.5296834151563714,"score_spread":0.34539884408102445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217700596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63114893,0.04814009,0.1308945,0.046538543,0.003703584,0.0015138128,0.021123089,0.0012686119,0.11566891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311107,0.006828049,0.04925557,0.0014091908,0.0009319495,0.00071719603,0.005896504,0.0003066539,0.00354427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498198,0.021392202,0.0082755,0.0043323482,0.015321543,0.00085863733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6228,0.24399589,0.05736372,0.03729419,0.03502373,0.0035224725],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04120133,0.00038990148,0.0006345711,0.028611768,0.003766684,0.01133022,0.0017604538,0.0013990559,0.004585128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32365462,0.00036961166,0.0006638596,0.05182119,0.004984878,0.012594913,0.006332815,0.0020037966,0.0009286719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002666716,0.000074574484,0.25192448,0.0043166573,0.00030065587,0.0005388476,0.068089046,0.00092836743,0.002081238,0.23095018,0.0326252,0.4079041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056618384,0.0002727167,0.31616497,0.0082395775,0.0005480958,0.0033632847,0.042365026,0.0061803106,0.0031697068,0.36293563,0.25633264,0.00037154657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068144957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006980501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2178961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329990976","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Nature Journals.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Green teacher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Outdoor education; Mathematics education; Environmental planning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.850606776780821,"score_gpt":0.6626810945041159,"score_spread":0.18792568227670503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329990976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18627484,0.024367908,0.02759239,0.018764034,0.005637972,0.0008202884,0.010598807,0.0009614548,0.7249823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7579274,0.014531325,0.053808916,0.0016497655,0.0026398576,0.00038851885,0.009557936,0.00030525628,0.15919112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98588526,0.0042974204,0.00096698315,0.00048327775,0.008003903,0.0003630926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414043,0.015560108,0.007527399,0.002147301,0.030003214,0.0033576756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013164279,0.0005119499,0.0006399223,0.011660807,0.0010911449,0.0071710167,0.0006932314,0.000812211,0.0266744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080273606,0.00013661715,0.0003367211,0.012114124,0.00052660384,0.003488717,0.0011097356,0.00050733035,0.009574784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044028193,0.00021847076,0.06881411,0.0009870033,0.00019472447,0.00014946882,0.00047398664,0.0017611918,0.002219831,0.02304275,0.12545155,0.7762466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020490796,0.0010903456,0.1783075,0.001739767,0.0007547944,0.0007836324,0.00487502,0.012288276,0.019176777,0.073355384,0.70725894,0.00016474837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033994461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011216111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021927592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003984234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08923471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332188426","doi":"10.1016/j.ausmj.2015.04.001","title":"Research Performance of Marketing Academics and Departments: An International Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Marketing; Citation; Political science; Public relations; Business; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.6761651646436725,"score_gpt":0.6069841516591631,"score_spread":0.0691810129845094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332188426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88677925,0.017277936,0.0018182982,0.0027393827,0.0003258831,0.00009204745,0.011488679,0.00032636858,0.0791521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799367,0.0046368786,0.0023081303,0.0001878157,0.00040148667,0.000073035524,0.007850924,0.00015085458,0.004454185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863853,0.0023824025,0.002434808,0.0013037405,0.0062565943,0.0012370254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9056745,0.026044155,0.019403722,0.0052901222,0.037637733,0.005949785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012532989,0.0005601272,0.001162376,0.04426713,0.00085714326,0.0063302233,0.0007072088,0.00059941877,0.0056122607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05913806,0.00019240958,0.0008867245,0.06760531,0.0009275404,0.004938688,0.0027763296,0.00058202783,0.0023040036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006287708,0.00026724162,0.78987217,0.0010402633,0.0010738474,0.00021557079,0.0024524813,0.0018115725,0.0022122147,0.006860783,0.010570497,0.18299466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034282304,0.0003516719,0.9665433,0.00021385838,0.0002682311,0.00037802305,0.0027263032,0.0009472363,0.0015913035,0.0013372015,0.025559427,0.00004908588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030086823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023541208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017623745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06628162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342331558","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00771","title":"Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject matter; Similarity (geometry); Interpersonal ties; Geographical distance; Economic geography; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Epistemology; Economic growth; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5123037864089308,"score_gpt":0.53942883396618,"score_spread":0.027125047557249204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342331558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851217,0.005953053,0.0009190214,0.0015459299,0.000039482595,0.000012567369,0.0010935632,0.000014857062,0.0052997866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963064,0.0023548205,0.00022434555,0.00005263495,0.000105389496,0.000009881697,0.0005154301,0.0000061820624,0.00042498444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546945,0.0020644087,0.0005488438,0.00053852244,0.0011281925,0.00025059626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8473479,0.09320746,0.042002723,0.0038223695,0.009414625,0.0042049335],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004338798,0.00026721365,0.00066816114,0.010303481,0.001125357,0.0028688686,0.0006836692,0.0010039241,0.0045712297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08396628,0.00023684764,0.0004648447,0.032846134,0.0012841736,0.0029361495,0.0027768645,0.0010444153,0.0009138627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014560258,0.000109509325,0.9681952,0.00032369772,0.00055654865,0.00020972909,0.0021829966,0.0010967138,0.00011338556,0.003806849,0.0013946908,0.021865053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004846416,0.00010035804,0.97635615,0.00029952807,0.00051376334,0.0002532117,0.0034760297,0.001905761,0.00025421224,0.011080404,0.005675361,0.000036793335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009147156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076427953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007464172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000734889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02294606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W349922622","doi":"","title":"El objetivo de la gerencia científica: ¿Excelencia o calidad?","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eduweb","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Unintended consequences; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Term (time); Public relations; Work (physics); Conjunction (astronomy); Business; Public administration; Engineering; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.22489398970429672,"score_gpt":0.5198774202832317,"score_spread":0.29498343057893495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W349922622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07099552,0.08464348,0.03323937,0.27527234,0.005269844,0.00020683742,0.0012995597,0.00047300762,0.5286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84115684,0.08031567,0.02895309,0.01678746,0.0050945412,0.00029394243,0.000780082,0.00036673492,0.026251663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97554785,0.010811807,0.0011820558,0.0017037096,0.009522415,0.001232242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610876,0.022828383,0.0035176142,0.0036986775,0.007125493,0.0017421801],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034695532,0.0009952969,0.002155699,0.0102534685,0.0034495427,0.03495366,0.0015643693,0.004329288,0.0052893334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06498046,0.0006077109,0.0007595558,0.019409463,0.018054921,0.01917803,0.0060391068,0.0048791645,0.002626475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011514574,0.00014660438,0.017146941,0.003135426,0.00022270912,0.00016302234,0.009530822,0.00064682786,0.0007613902,0.67488945,0.04440964,0.24883206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006439581,0.00011281669,0.017650677,0.0034819073,0.00021319404,0.00050890516,0.016458828,0.0009396363,0.0014708649,0.5291255,0.42987496,0.00009827414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005552244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049468307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006103564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011077779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18348974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40023826","doi":"","title":"Promoting Public Access Policies: A New Role for Librarians","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Outreach; Publishing; Public relations; Subsidy; Political science; Library science; Scholarly communication; Equity (law); Best practice; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.7134962743651571,"score_gpt":0.6116044235522415,"score_spread":0.10189185081291552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40023826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022168409,0.006155311,0.011050436,0.8973949,0.0035300693,0.000094601084,0.0000518605,0.0011969154,0.07830909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25266215,0.03177757,0.10254505,0.43698975,0.019015558,0.0013706068,0.00038366133,0.002470736,0.15278493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90601754,0.06291605,0.0040069656,0.0040381425,0.01663054,0.006390741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7106658,0.15018871,0.011091504,0.035745826,0.041158743,0.051149394],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11971322,0.0011120368,0.0022725242,0.0053908713,0.024495179,0.08222152,0.0056846295,0.028993266,0.043712962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15475838,0.0016550047,0.0013532643,0.0075276364,0.032416098,0.11263367,0.031916432,0.02098686,0.024105696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005848778,0.00026549745,0.0018614823,0.0008226547,0.000031630727,0.00018543954,0.015926406,0.00019196444,0.0005461895,0.24609095,0.5410485,0.1929707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004667615,0.00004021576,0.0005830039,0.00089873053,0.00002177765,0.00017460185,0.0142834885,0.00020717188,0.00033228178,0.12181398,0.86151767,0.00008034262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037031302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004897194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012249978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059853714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6331116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200119498","doi":"10.1302/3114-210143","title":"CORS Paper Session: Top Canadian Research - Founder's Award Candidates Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"OrthoMedia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.46773553415353303,"score_gpt":0.5678674728009943,"score_spread":0.10013193864746123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200119498","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026525743,0.00015275851,0.00015100962,0.00064774585,0.00051501195,0.00014368547,0.9901113,0.0009190044,0.0070942254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017275468,0.00020531323,0.00096654805,0.00039033865,0.0002202244,0.00041816983,0.9690814,0.00045530836,0.026535157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947391,0.000396367,0.00032479657,0.0008189002,0.0025367523,0.0011841032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775064,0.0027421182,0.0010643967,0.003123094,0.010509042,0.00505492],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005430115,0.0023575725,0.0028939794,0.015365637,0.004171486,0.009399923,0.0031913223,0.0018511915,0.21248193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022102157,0.00092603225,0.0020289961,0.017273152,0.001029673,0.002067245,0.0041126194,0.002720439,0.16231976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001974749,0.0000048208776,0.00022701245,0.00008709396,0.0000036009562,0.0000035617982,0.0000070266547,0.000036466063,0.000019157073,0.00018889077,0.9979966,0.0014060583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010641843,0.000008933168,0.004941786,0.00014795463,0.00001418727,0.0000104704395,0.00009530839,0.00021041372,0.00016613679,0.0007124038,0.99356127,0.00002467249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4411588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.660306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010148119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035942975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87718195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200179249","doi":"10.5194/ica-abs-3-327-2021","title":"Mapping academic migration of German-affiliated researchers across countries using 8 million Scopus publications from 1996 to 2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts of the ICA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Scopus; German; Political science; Library science; Regional science; Geography; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.5778530138453009,"score_gpt":0.5904958469721848,"score_spread":0.012642833126883968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200179249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97394127,0.0025091525,0.00028486774,0.00028816386,0.000019086152,0.000016057227,0.018705545,0.00005424325,0.004181678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801655,0.0022872605,0.0009041253,0.000034141296,0.000028118167,0.00003848785,0.015447652,0.0000133606445,0.0010814415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929833,0.000090365196,0.0001557648,0.000140403,0.00018078841,0.00013420993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647105,0.0007390415,0.0016800972,0.00014211197,0.00074814114,0.00021948267],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012370222,0.00035076364,0.00033093677,0.021363165,0.00052541855,0.00220339,0.00032113178,0.0003606105,0.001267394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047322595,0.00012048179,0.00044847612,0.030812718,0.00032327927,0.0014326922,0.0017056178,0.00029821566,0.00048661037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002676066,0.00007147479,0.91263473,0.000981753,0.0003736233,0.0006384896,0.004674017,0.0030561036,0.0015371378,0.0035663084,0.009203922,0.06299479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010575771,0.000037159567,0.97461534,0.00025303764,0.000116167685,0.00027223973,0.006256867,0.0016892994,0.00068863755,0.00062120875,0.015413867,0.000025617359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034503322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03288909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97863686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012437305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011651742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068604946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200217035","doi":"10.1177/01622439211068798","title":"Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Sociotechnical system; Function (biology); Sociology; Aside; Sharing economy; Peer production; Public relations; Diversity (politics); Sustainability; Political science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.4501804417858459,"score_gpt":0.5881591697196226,"score_spread":0.1379787279337767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200217035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35935876,0.012918532,0.04226881,0.045068596,0.0026177256,0.000555252,0.000539985,0.00062046974,0.536052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96841484,0.0027230156,0.0039015054,0.0008152932,0.0027365466,0.00020265968,0.00010993582,0.00012796356,0.020968243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455737,0.025651807,0.0031980837,0.0044789216,0.017155902,0.0039414796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6875059,0.15466942,0.06623433,0.02072665,0.04606401,0.024799716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046173144,0.0005244626,0.0010009683,0.0095179,0.0056136874,0.026281202,0.0029874642,0.0032997066,0.015109299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20185558,0.00069633743,0.00054838334,0.0076391697,0.009494422,0.013210758,0.007372854,0.0019943747,0.003684111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050531485,0.00030021986,0.06004955,0.0007920814,0.00022014527,0.0015185369,0.018943604,0.0072662677,0.0020268082,0.70290244,0.024311515,0.18116343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031488438,0.0005271162,0.07800751,0.00080818776,0.00018887948,0.0014858448,0.017174188,0.009330273,0.0027413915,0.5088838,0.3802604,0.0002775761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001438436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067962534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012036376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2441898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200247834","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.002","title":"Funding assistance and global productivity in the field of implant overdentures: A bibliometric analysis of 35 years","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Poisson regression; Medicine; Implant; Bibliometrics; Productivity; Dentistry; Demography; Library science; Environmental health; Economics; Population; Computer science; Economic growth; Surgery; Sociology","score_opus":0.23291440679425998,"score_gpt":0.5349318690618226,"score_spread":0.30201746226756254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200247834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982392,0.009146958,0.00015363155,0.00054986734,0.000031827356,0.000013274753,0.004275283,0.000015260375,0.0034219166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946621,0.0030061852,0.000097889184,0.000026694863,0.000041023937,0.000007875634,0.001835216,0.000003564709,0.00031949306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971853,0.0006206925,0.00071554043,0.00023543356,0.00093412405,0.0003090047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456,0.0055193524,0.00661715,0.00041525267,0.0021218813,0.0007663286],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031852487,0.0002629945,0.0005978075,0.02254687,0.0005959578,0.0022387772,0.00039758795,0.00050510763,0.0017993238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016056916,0.00013305893,0.0009292973,0.038466297,0.00057931046,0.0016314611,0.0014445343,0.00032396914,0.00034909547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103238395,0.0000396977,0.971218,0.00031661283,0.00039419509,0.00014219791,0.0010428827,0.00044865033,0.00009787623,0.00033405566,0.00092466874,0.024937795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028839472,0.000037738933,0.9953512,0.000077434524,0.00013225096,0.00014436201,0.0012344741,0.0002001529,0.00006159269,0.00007935947,0.0026703193,0.000008150105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014397802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017638935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012787586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024497374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028627992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200275016","doi":"10.1108/lhtn-01-2021-0001","title":"Highly cited articles in social sciences: an analytical study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scopus; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Social network analysis; Social science; Collaborative network; Set (abstract data type); Library science; Scientometrics; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Statistics; Social capital; Political science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.6832023079725885,"score_gpt":0.5845864305698747,"score_spread":0.09861587740271383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200275016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866644,0.002124041,0.002294912,0.00044442614,0.00006926945,0.0002565979,0.00070699217,0.000024859926,0.0074144844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949511,0.0008867994,0.00255718,0.000055377357,0.00011281175,0.00019730056,0.00037681192,0.000012821968,0.00084984984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927032,0.002022907,0.0010135849,0.00081018306,0.0028142266,0.0006358934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366715,0.04310547,0.009245712,0.0014423332,0.0077029676,0.0018320855],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005593645,0.00032703072,0.0006741539,0.03745335,0.0022506732,0.0059637227,0.0008373672,0.0006956036,0.0027701224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036976323,0.00021199873,0.0007111294,0.04740541,0.0018619896,0.0027669326,0.0025405865,0.00043567998,0.00043792743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003463713,0.00041299584,0.80627394,0.0022367092,0.00038156167,0.0035748375,0.058712125,0.0005844779,0.0028881885,0.010651812,0.002690204,0.11124671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000317801,0.00040712405,0.7983881,0.0008562757,0.00035400424,0.0053733233,0.15349449,0.004351624,0.002392227,0.008533341,0.025730321,0.000087370645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016318564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018038008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96254665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019974797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025324156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029582381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200395585","doi":"10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4","title":"Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":938,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Terminology; Publishing; Data science; Strengths and weaknesses; Population health; Computer science; Population; Library science; Medicine; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.652587060367001,"score_gpt":0.6967628458869507,"score_spread":0.04417578551994972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200395585","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015990643,0.105077654,0.6265172,0.020815622,0.006192861,0.0046240417,0.03895518,0.01091759,0.17090929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22171031,0.12235201,0.5744923,0.0024919664,0.012280874,0.0092554595,0.027740149,0.0031569768,0.02651999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.923606,0.031578343,0.009432336,0.004505399,0.029783273,0.0010946455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81697804,0.127156,0.021748597,0.013744258,0.017996898,0.0023763126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04218778,0.0027256177,0.004695127,0.1364984,0.003975601,0.02057233,0.0036909555,0.0033825901,0.014394203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19288604,0.0013773489,0.003119998,0.21680813,0.0052840626,0.022150982,0.008033317,0.0028110833,0.00849423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012299076,0.00013242371,0.013159342,0.0083104335,0.0011557981,0.00022661152,0.0037155214,0.0061648292,0.00060045416,0.4139281,0.111222364,0.44126114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085094165,0.00012351101,0.01541713,0.0037420625,0.0003936238,0.00063868973,0.0030749165,0.012365505,0.000986999,0.48727405,0.47561473,0.00028363208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046510333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003572919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008641784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108333435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.223113},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4200411224","doi":"10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00145","title":"Equitable Open Access Publishing: Changing the Financial Power Dynamics in Academia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Health Science and Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Power (physics); Key (lock); Scientific publishing; Business; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.6666360541358185,"score_gpt":0.6934644981662952,"score_spread":0.026828444030476684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200411224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03830335,0.002262153,0.0066124904,0.8406066,0.0024804953,0.00016739215,0.00024303349,0.00027028078,0.10905419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84809554,0.0028441646,0.00902276,0.113228016,0.0070155226,0.00038049108,0.00025037886,0.00029712616,0.018865995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510406,0.024220629,0.002705917,0.0025793829,0.013233887,0.006219601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7206388,0.1482869,0.03147776,0.013638159,0.03198533,0.053973127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058481812,0.00035171813,0.0005676789,0.004386583,0.008877344,0.03436153,0.0029950722,0.008520584,0.037837915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26694664,0.0004748357,0.000587298,0.004739315,0.015539176,0.032241218,0.019662779,0.00637178,0.0056430614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021845603,0.00033185052,0.02784647,0.0008232985,0.000060675226,0.00045914474,0.022267401,0.00048546155,0.00068757613,0.43787634,0.2383621,0.27058125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015993443,0.00017296054,0.020534988,0.0019242183,0.000038281465,0.00054744666,0.026553024,0.0009499503,0.0010622834,0.5086084,0.4392958,0.00015271519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003684361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059674834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03699712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3092851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200513059","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.095","title":"Ten Years of Publications: Scientometric Comparison of Major Neurosurgical Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Surgical Specialties (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Family medicine; Peer review; Library science; Demography; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.7736103544391487,"score_gpt":0.6341894885965442,"score_spread":0.1394208658426045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200513059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08601751,0.89440745,0.0008060032,0.001768423,0.00076401583,0.00013488221,0.009919745,0.00007051336,0.0061115436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62656707,0.3555245,0.0022356748,0.00048982323,0.0017028875,0.00028121623,0.011601407,0.00004545717,0.0015518814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97965646,0.0043704268,0.0062600253,0.001435166,0.007778163,0.0004997757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94514745,0.023711381,0.015722986,0.0014640067,0.0123138735,0.0016403198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014357374,0.0008592325,0.0033469908,0.08574836,0.00080235535,0.0055133016,0.0012968533,0.0010848757,0.003203855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0561843,0.00039745745,0.0055494937,0.113316566,0.00085726613,0.004120907,0.0021265969,0.0009440356,0.00069665344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018840419,0.00022047815,0.46248645,0.06475515,0.033255327,0.0005611939,0.002643081,0.0008304851,0.0007239808,0.002763126,0.01789646,0.41198024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018900151,0.00055567373,0.8877369,0.0165742,0.01983833,0.0018319107,0.003842916,0.0006867913,0.00048000162,0.003892677,0.06422025,0.00015129999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057962965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010349605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024953198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070478003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07592994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200604447","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003","title":"Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; University of Ottawa; Hamilton General Hospital; McMaster University; Carleton University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Publishing; Ranking (information retrieval); Medical education; Cross-sectional study; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9633189143454393,"score_gpt":0.8121707407502468,"score_spread":0.1511481735951925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200604447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989304,0.00013460495,0.00007113119,0.00021680004,0.000009403597,0.000016959308,0.00008730274,0.0000022577717,0.0005312475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992249,0.0000873913,0.00006347075,0.00020674938,0.000014753217,0.000013728279,0.00007586803,0.0000039991937,0.0003091328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273384,0.002644789,0.0009262906,0.0009179508,0.0016991302,0.0010779954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379616,0.020296566,0.020802982,0.0043922164,0.007247126,0.009299524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008423052,0.00026811525,0.00067688164,0.001917408,0.0021486569,0.0033022873,0.0012900186,0.0020250173,0.003223759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034309223,0.0008609688,0.00053947704,0.0032288576,0.0017795695,0.0030410571,0.0018260089,0.0029701062,0.00095180765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039714017,0.0003810152,0.9962857,0.000012727072,0.000030264135,0.000048015852,0.0017291618,0.000009233456,0.000050572802,0.000056012042,0.00012035664,0.0012372716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006112262,0.00038758494,0.9933675,0.000022617409,0.000024880504,0.00012756426,0.005524629,0.000076980454,0.000037314778,0.000060233077,0.00035679754,0.000007868482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010759746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011128691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011632517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026849653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04454583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205093351","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4","title":"Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.602524977077691,"score_gpt":0.5280129047586363,"score_spread":0.07451207231905477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205093351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74113417,0.0064461473,0.005639221,0.0042095417,0.0002178717,0.00006229711,0.017152756,0.0004869349,0.22465113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8219464,0.005739571,0.0046258755,0.00014608377,0.00009197621,0.00006391734,0.009419181,0.00022604848,0.15774095],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952495,0.00009981054,0.000029823383,0.000058642363,0.0002278791,0.00005899885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411017,0.002932619,0.0006056833,0.00025378537,0.0012627763,0.0008348822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010232043,0.00018615618,0.00021442786,0.0042055296,0.00083221705,0.004369973,0.00060246524,0.00052956626,0.024312215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008791993,0.00019829837,0.00032912852,0.007999063,0.00032467843,0.0039692787,0.0016325238,0.0006898338,0.00805967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069357257,0.00044627825,0.23291734,0.00038674392,0.00009709172,0.0006688629,0.020428203,0.005886257,0.003798973,0.16445613,0.051712148,0.51850843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047684574,0.00049868267,0.5413315,0.00053967396,0.000089087785,0.0013343524,0.033224877,0.019280473,0.008073083,0.12809904,0.26729664,0.00018491081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035476142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005813623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99897677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001074231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001061807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081332505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205204355","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_20","title":"Publication performance of Indian authors in high impact anesthesiology journals: Are we doing enough?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anesthesiology; Distribution (mathematics); MEDLINE; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.5393516176418273,"score_gpt":0.6275804711053232,"score_spread":0.08822885346349596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205204355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78770494,0.16537909,0.0012427445,0.027622253,0.0020885023,0.0002237069,0.0030529746,0.00012146042,0.012564299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397683,0.053137314,0.0013158934,0.0017635439,0.0018688497,0.000096710704,0.00093462615,0.000059735292,0.0010549227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758221,0.005548677,0.0063948836,0.0021646016,0.008564104,0.0015055964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7248481,0.0924034,0.12961198,0.006359914,0.033336807,0.0134398425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014708346,0.00046276278,0.001467922,0.014159115,0.0018074156,0.009782107,0.0019387511,0.0012165485,0.00467157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114670254,0.00054886047,0.001305657,0.028088935,0.00209476,0.005534005,0.0023118276,0.0013454445,0.0016834842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037891584,0.00010680435,0.9093826,0.0059218537,0.0005741149,0.0008552904,0.008241839,0.000076069686,0.00038668863,0.0005769407,0.0052603493,0.06823858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053970478,0.00040796405,0.9339193,0.005439596,0.0012630185,0.0057969945,0.028650267,0.00028155156,0.00075489585,0.0015786648,0.021695672,0.00015810353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003106249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004628681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98584086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016824292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072041512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07778609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205335600","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0073","title":"Language of citation and publishing performance of graduate students in French-speaking countries with different economic and linguistic advantages","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Publishing; Socioeconomic status; Publication; Citation; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.23947992711940594,"score_gpt":0.480401876642018,"score_spread":0.24092194952261206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205335600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98977774,0.0026792923,0.000083335544,0.00048181287,0.000021190872,0.0000049943037,0.00077339506,0.000012919989,0.006165302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717796,0.0010568149,0.00011452309,0.00007142075,0.000039793125,0.0000038250273,0.00064003264,0.0000047447134,0.0008907987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868375,0.0003335991,0.00021879507,0.00014826767,0.00039207618,0.00022349224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887504,0.003254814,0.003511408,0.00028781942,0.0032517426,0.0009438181],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024163646,0.0001807642,0.0003687601,0.006863846,0.00066667877,0.0030150383,0.0002491311,0.00029542684,0.0026199005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014070863,0.000039294402,0.00028687294,0.011311712,0.0005594432,0.0008016163,0.00084021856,0.00020253207,0.00048510707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093405004,0.000027920269,0.94862455,0.0002595098,0.00016508352,0.00040238557,0.006472883,0.00013296053,0.0009366588,0.0010218173,0.001349813,0.040513046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049842433,0.000047403235,0.98699665,0.0000877883,0.000045191777,0.0004369505,0.005682181,0.00009999746,0.00032854796,0.00026427503,0.005990843,0.000015038068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020184236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031127326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014105815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014360559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040133536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205497103","doi":"10.1111/ele.13949","title":"Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"National Research Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Dilemma; Open access publishing; Payment; Political science; Business; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.43355794612484516,"score_gpt":0.5250981601662262,"score_spread":0.09154021404138107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205497103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055434355,0.008887858,0.0019398598,0.95140034,0.0034662236,0.000039621133,0.000051237726,0.000047107784,0.028624276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4332674,0.041578263,0.012858148,0.4322646,0.03427673,0.0006801184,0.00015696895,0.000485046,0.04443276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8957769,0.06178233,0.006341023,0.0050205463,0.024314547,0.006764716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6272395,0.25851446,0.023147184,0.020354262,0.022369808,0.048374806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12213115,0.0007452172,0.0020407448,0.006146828,0.017139526,0.043950137,0.004346895,0.018584654,0.020977994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34010455,0.0011761591,0.0011841959,0.0140123,0.0331955,0.05893215,0.026615236,0.01864317,0.008392949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018515051,0.00018261827,0.005162387,0.0011141078,0.00011014121,0.0012348819,0.038695756,0.00027511208,0.0004194296,0.49638718,0.29773545,0.15849769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008225977,0.00008529469,0.0012219201,0.002080837,0.000033380864,0.001179332,0.031077914,0.00025606315,0.00022049912,0.3569553,0.60670763,0.00009957126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025154792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020291458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95604986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061834888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027230792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64589894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205638194","doi":"10.1038/d41586-022-00058-x","title":"For better science, increase Indigenous participation in publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Path (computing); Library science; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Biology; Engineering; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.3565946757863185,"score_gpt":0.5735883553595541,"score_spread":0.21699367957323562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205638194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48245832,0.0041090157,0.008244648,0.05375095,0.0011421931,0.0002899366,0.0007914174,0.00042272377,0.4487907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911276,0.0031749979,0.0126344925,0.0053676693,0.000983139,0.00026853938,0.00043693293,0.00015800218,0.06570024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861616,0.00445968,0.0006526249,0.0007183425,0.0063188644,0.0016889923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610226,0.011661979,0.006765569,0.0033093956,0.008947793,0.008292587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010107682,0.00033955032,0.0006049215,0.0074145854,0.0040726336,0.010128967,0.00118693,0.0021036211,0.0320006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038150784,0.00020247104,0.0006584451,0.009529725,0.0025839377,0.006360626,0.005355086,0.0018175808,0.004955462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028157575,0.00204208,0.16116251,0.0032621988,0.00060768245,0.0007742746,0.057292935,0.0008101891,0.017793357,0.10291604,0.034621876,0.61843526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011399044,0.00043992832,0.35167086,0.0014927929,0.000359157,0.0012385611,0.049390096,0.0009968547,0.006491147,0.06299948,0.524656,0.00015107634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011098652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024079278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027143063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010287723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107052684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206198473","doi":"10.1007/s11135-021-01307-3","title":"A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"CLARITY; Gray (unit); Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Psychology; White (mutation); Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7644337497125743,"score_gpt":0.6138022337726904,"score_spread":0.1506315159398839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206198473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41372126,0.0077157016,0.15207045,0.12864418,0.00096719136,0.00022028216,0.00014116195,0.000096540265,0.29642323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99048156,0.00054942025,0.006624775,0.0013975601,0.00015522701,0.000045305263,0.000010970757,0.000014887296,0.0007202917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.975204,0.018457148,0.0007185499,0.0011646528,0.0038257132,0.0006300233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90444684,0.067245826,0.014668654,0.0033473708,0.007303183,0.0029880647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026197178,0.0005238585,0.0005436852,0.0076547246,0.0032253372,0.015375891,0.0015513801,0.002945436,0.0030490737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05750342,0.00049687043,0.00048088148,0.0035710689,0.060501873,0.014242195,0.007216259,0.0040948624,0.00025164126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058045214,0.00006863077,0.008064908,0.00019255647,0.00003328523,0.00014154057,0.04226412,0.0007276291,0.0004661952,0.9382755,0.00092355476,0.008784013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003133551,0.000066842076,0.010089691,0.00039219923,0.0000335413,0.00017249181,0.03858154,0.0027278834,0.0004220675,0.9302744,0.017142177,0.000065894266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002664727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006840417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028309529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13854557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206255780","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2021.802428","title":"A Protocol for a Scoping Review Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Infectious Disease Research in Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital; Population Health Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; York University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Public health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); MEDLINE; License; Global health; Bibliometrics; Protocol (science); Medical research","score_opus":0.8577549250995014,"score_gpt":0.6881283510821358,"score_spread":0.16962657401736558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206255780","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003139816,0.00060122355,0.002448982,0.00090977707,0.0005086572,0.9829413,0.010615729,0.0002249391,0.0014353509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00025591016,0.00033285277,0.004793603,0.00015459425,0.000032270873,0.99311477,0.00079515035,0.000020299522,0.00050058786],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9099329,0.04015721,0.033714104,0.0052888296,0.008105051,0.002801891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7671243,0.10390217,0.027970305,0.026768256,0.06838655,0.0058483835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13269207,0.004589999,0.01188684,0.027230628,0.005424437,0.010041588,0.005383988,0.008279472,0.15889496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2123047,0.005347528,0.011953537,0.026301814,0.0053403806,0.009256465,0.0074189072,0.008484509,0.027142564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008053061,0.00088833406,0.001390589,0.62870646,0.0016819527,0.0014188892,0.006940643,0.0021382559,0.0027929877,0.0196807,0.22084586,0.10546236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018482894,0.0013720376,0.0058513866,0.32709962,0.0020309826,0.0006413588,0.005874826,0.0018466349,0.0024056332,0.029809318,0.6039414,0.0006439752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008248025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015329535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0765316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7017511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206266831","doi":"10.1101/2022.01.05.475103","title":"The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Collegiality; Promotion (chess); Discipline; Academic institution; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Management; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.21636138119647225,"score_gpt":0.44975308357864,"score_spread":0.23339170238216778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206266831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338066,0.0076316083,0.005865733,0.013537674,0.00042898682,0.00038764565,0.0001589625,0.00014196787,0.03804081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953381,0.00079113716,0.0018776045,0.00041833415,0.00041485424,0.00010631989,0.000052847074,0.000021355934,0.0009794899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78651303,0.12983021,0.018523756,0.005508667,0.053563464,0.0060608634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19953199,0.5029281,0.18402494,0.01752901,0.059258953,0.036727026],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1208064,0.00029277377,0.00083604455,0.022296766,0.0124229435,0.0152797215,0.0029957772,0.0018196747,0.0027108444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53049725,0.0006674643,0.00063453085,0.0150834,0.009118013,0.010030598,0.009753494,0.0027419054,0.0005037481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054006523,0.0006405147,0.5336848,0.0018874861,0.00032110038,0.0010073982,0.12020847,0.00053736055,0.0016095692,0.0163707,0.00805175,0.31514078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090477704,0.0006873266,0.8889424,0.0013835408,0.00011806789,0.0009996458,0.05892294,0.001327452,0.0011744893,0.013225277,0.03276488,0.00036345623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007260602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015028823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011151414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020295538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63889295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206478242","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.1989705","title":"Citation network analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Data science; Function (biology); Citation analysis; Foundation (evidence); Computer science; Psychology; Management science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.32447096001178327,"score_gpt":0.5763294073670355,"score_spread":0.25185844735525226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206478242","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037223704,0.025988739,0.4560053,0.005220005,0.0033343448,0.008053094,0.22844419,0.01153512,0.2241955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34672666,0.018652886,0.42737606,0.0009198371,0.0015107852,0.01469808,0.1309712,0.0022523666,0.056892257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98221475,0.0056054373,0.0032654284,0.003491101,0.004800674,0.00062273483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433812,0.032958243,0.00633889,0.004356527,0.01233339,0.0006317933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013472148,0.001501336,0.002110263,0.050217796,0.0022123547,0.007520131,0.0029079735,0.0018090095,0.05414474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09578334,0.0005550581,0.003118161,0.05726354,0.00085623795,0.0046514836,0.002714584,0.0013447906,0.0113528585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024475198,0.00013527804,0.03339234,0.012129768,0.0021029075,0.00041013252,0.003048487,0.018102802,0.0010270169,0.18587717,0.24445434,0.4990751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007833758,0.00009718727,0.019148232,0.0024536578,0.0011291783,0.00058597344,0.0015754531,0.04598151,0.0018029346,0.1519589,0.77502793,0.00016071236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010155512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010382689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98652786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036199635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069728764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1811322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206983357","doi":"10.4242/balisagevol7.usdin01","title":"Serendipity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Balisage series on markup technologies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Luck; Face (sociological concept); Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer security; Social science","score_opus":0.7067267809977053,"score_gpt":0.5319341951220168,"score_spread":0.17479258587568847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206983357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021509477,0.0036240295,0.015911734,0.019161338,0.034225535,0.0003012734,0.0025655539,0.006729361,0.91533023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032790117,0.0031732018,0.0063934163,0.0066683153,0.015336183,0.00049549417,0.0028485807,0.005846734,0.9264479],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906194,0.0025223934,0.00055814395,0.0016518055,0.0033939227,0.0012543134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96956885,0.0047531915,0.0018987786,0.0076103304,0.008678655,0.0074901422],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00852282,0.0015323645,0.0012746316,0.005306947,0.004185578,0.019279124,0.0027939943,0.0028542818,0.4072721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040621664,0.0007804954,0.0011917969,0.003196487,0.0029072438,0.012361515,0.014918629,0.004399833,0.30046523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112625334,0.00002775957,0.00030818742,0.00038853058,0.000015796651,0.00023187058,0.00078405096,0.00009276243,0.0007646117,0.074919164,0.8279848,0.09436986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066745606,0.000017140734,0.000117498486,0.00009346102,0.000003887434,0.00022545009,0.000106664724,0.000045904984,0.0002382579,0.0047472687,0.9943878,0.000009973217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005634092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076054013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99469304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002397399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038858813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8454544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207049150","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00180","title":"Predicting the impact of <i>American Economic Review</i> articles by author characteristics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Exploit; Quarter (Canadian coin); Institution; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; History; Law","score_opus":0.6240591201744193,"score_gpt":0.6427755631256137,"score_spread":0.018716442951194345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207049150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97245806,0.007553443,0.0008894891,0.0028253486,0.00029361653,0.00005993408,0.0030230617,0.00006640332,0.012830742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952058,0.0019106198,0.00045681308,0.00015382678,0.0003193764,0.000024963849,0.0010369933,0.000012600696,0.00087899703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421024,0.002581857,0.00071897294,0.00048773544,0.0017037648,0.00029751798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8359869,0.10428921,0.037166752,0.0029424378,0.01437742,0.0052373223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009254366,0.0002736734,0.00065778155,0.008566483,0.00045114435,0.003696843,0.00036910814,0.000657419,0.004019056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090548106,0.00015945743,0.0004970827,0.0122705065,0.0003685262,0.0012967088,0.00069876394,0.00052914576,0.0013975279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015519263,0.00009611973,0.97375286,0.00022108032,0.00041928276,0.00011754607,0.00007990583,0.00092831807,0.00027627795,0.00037329318,0.0070619886,0.016518218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036971316,0.00012418367,0.9860504,0.00013527156,0.0004348969,0.00016054232,0.00031813886,0.0051815095,0.00048538443,0.000641025,0.0064155743,0.000016067012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002946346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00452936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007308902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009282703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048942327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210255074","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.2.02","title":"Strategies to Increase the Number of Open Access Journals: The Cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Open access journal; Library science; Political science; Business; Computer science; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5532761290723078,"score_gpt":0.6122283546242888,"score_spread":0.058952225551980986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210255074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6561846,0.004914975,0.005359919,0.07453228,0.00037822057,0.0002749987,0.00015127612,0.00031547344,0.25788826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97761565,0.0014275911,0.0031147366,0.003758652,0.00029808067,0.00011213816,0.000057382105,0.00007572849,0.013539925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761788,0.0059288186,0.0010746628,0.0023184242,0.009811495,0.0046878033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8646511,0.07723644,0.015236103,0.005599111,0.011866143,0.025411177],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028757203,0.00058197463,0.00056631624,0.007081808,0.008480751,0.02487966,0.0025230125,0.0061947773,0.008795523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079424724,0.00065563415,0.00087800395,0.009106689,0.008878733,0.018962586,0.011020059,0.004513523,0.001176539],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042144235,0.0006453288,0.12279347,0.00047394726,0.00013501236,0.007299469,0.050249916,0.0010362589,0.0037556035,0.61547184,0.033397,0.1643207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041295728,0.0006948063,0.11103347,0.0008132581,0.0002097497,0.0064690174,0.11666451,0.0044223163,0.0080697965,0.14623797,0.6044602,0.0005119788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101364525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134495795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013009777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017849782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15208441},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4210354806","doi":"10.1101/2022.01.21.477291","title":"Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Index (typography); Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive load; Content analysis; Presentation (obstetrics); Promotion (chess); Multimedia; Cognition; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.26881593312804025,"score_gpt":0.44616774012456956,"score_spread":0.1773518069965293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210354806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712683,0.00084406766,0.006498192,0.0013032607,0.00018591231,0.0014725203,0.002281093,0.00013429511,0.016012251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96769375,0.0016263692,0.019103795,0.00083902106,0.0001961961,0.0021083471,0.0023684949,0.00015039634,0.005913607],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997279,0.0014229659,0.00019478529,0.00018244717,0.0006825896,0.00023822389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382646,0.046751816,0.0050878506,0.0008799787,0.007565372,0.001450356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769066,0.00033163477,0.0002319658,0.0037112867,0.0009261108,0.0019233458,0.00044799095,0.0006291041,0.0030347577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0624409,0.00016756341,0.00024748404,0.0020744137,0.00083431357,0.0018459213,0.0010944861,0.0007852947,0.0005420726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010229436,0.0009851899,0.16160382,0.0045900783,0.00009809195,0.003134388,0.30130914,0.00064245483,0.011400095,0.0032022404,0.034898657,0.47711292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893274,0.001291608,0.5816324,0.0053503155,0.00012690671,0.0021102845,0.2486947,0.0040429668,0.0066071954,0.0025181305,0.14730726,0.00024930324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00490501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010579225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020563009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014512967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030510068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210401899","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100758","title":"Impact of institutional affiliation bias on editorial publication decisions: A bibliometric analysis of three ophthalmology journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Medicine and Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Impact factor; Ophthalmology; Blinding; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8774203146863786,"score_gpt":0.6741541490313949,"score_spread":0.20326616565498368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210401899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98389673,0.0062966105,0.00068701233,0.0009544586,0.000107984175,0.00013380672,0.002412503,0.000047324666,0.0054635545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632937,0.0011999717,0.00077888416,0.00008875701,0.00019964752,0.000059178,0.0010534027,0.000017959093,0.00027277807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9413401,0.01843855,0.014816349,0.0032369534,0.020319033,0.0018490548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6083814,0.23760572,0.09537994,0.010339961,0.042882603,0.0054103173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027928114,0.00055338565,0.0017777797,0.05664511,0.002219645,0.009896596,0.0012517095,0.0013453139,0.0032314323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20353761,0.00028962136,0.00230307,0.0897242,0.001581585,0.0032969776,0.0030983754,0.0007071886,0.0006311168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005393873,0.00015901451,0.9562338,0.0009878587,0.0021014323,0.0002953919,0.0020690113,0.00046794047,0.00050974084,0.000568178,0.0013469753,0.03472128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009067497,0.00018751345,0.98612994,0.00028625812,0.0021891885,0.0004869591,0.0042082355,0.0014557071,0.0007612045,0.0009331927,0.0032135085,0.000057584544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003545021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043188795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029215435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075609796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14769977},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4210431609","doi":"10.1161/atvbaha.122.317426","title":"Web of Science’s Citation Median Metrics Overcome the Major Constraints of the Journal Impact Factor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Confounding; Web of science","score_opus":0.4076204520865951,"score_gpt":0.498494001608876,"score_spread":0.09087354952228094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210431609","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19863822,0.04987307,0.40457326,0.01171666,0.0045423643,0.0025735314,0.14099687,0.0138218505,0.17326419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5899307,0.010988084,0.33286056,0.0012449642,0.0037077488,0.0025596782,0.045234386,0.0033630708,0.010110813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9428639,0.012119305,0.009226689,0.0033004694,0.03137438,0.0011153679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77436304,0.09450215,0.03171637,0.023761865,0.07108575,0.0045708376],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03806291,0.0017763595,0.0035856206,0.054244038,0.001664429,0.012920607,0.0016651241,0.00160497,0.006845544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20784357,0.0006368097,0.0022516511,0.06735737,0.0012209913,0.011920278,0.004358937,0.002273282,0.0036755374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005915858,0.00030219957,0.117309265,0.007140203,0.0034379547,0.00019456637,0.0014709495,0.006026621,0.0047643087,0.06711266,0.10735798,0.6842917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552346,0.0011133852,0.3044656,0.0022199915,0.0011044785,0.0011656582,0.0011366996,0.024926865,0.011942668,0.12132749,0.52972853,0.00071335555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037124837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00615693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96193707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021325499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005618808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20129836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210563664","doi":"10.1021/cen-v089n010.p012","title":"See You in Toronto!","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical & Engineering News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Icon; Altmetrics; Social media; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4337777249594912,"score_gpt":0.4914867670297343,"score_spread":0.05770904207024313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210563664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048681896,0.0013461431,0.0005634103,0.0066486225,0.011214635,0.0003942322,0.011262694,0.0065394305,0.96154404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004967502,0.00035765875,0.00010881035,0.00067452213,0.00035214517,0.00003319405,0.0015253851,0.0006928426,0.9957586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992761,0.000039116574,0.000033246786,0.00011433222,0.0003792507,0.00015798051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996073,0.0001454711,0.000103418446,0.00030521885,0.0013916373,0.0019812323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063638046,0.0015706754,0.0012577663,0.001801418,0.0024815826,0.006185883,0.0014165018,0.0024845186,0.9569028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004446642,0.0007503694,0.00081579416,0.001986353,0.0006671997,0.0034633232,0.00396519,0.0022445032,0.94054615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015298401,0.000011493651,0.000052338823,0.0000467358,9.665172e-7,0.00002333896,0.00001964331,0.000008552197,0.000058468413,0.00016981407,0.9851189,0.0144743845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043965433,0.0000059949093,0.00020462448,0.000028528604,9.621455e-7,0.000013514956,0.000042961256,0.000008131707,0.000046043468,0.00006446709,0.9995759,0.000004447961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03279445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07034026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024951464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003733183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065207124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211053938","doi":"10.1007/s11845-022-02943-w","title":"Publish or perish: the dilatory fate of “in press” papers in contemporary scientific publications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publish or perish; Library science; Classics; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.7215413523076528,"score_gpt":0.5723215383077955,"score_spread":0.1492198139998573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211053938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010972868,0.0011108806,0.000031641666,0.98978966,0.0047108848,0.0000032935136,0.00004145161,0.000006116632,0.0032086968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029960638,0.0016714556,0.00013796908,0.91474664,0.040001217,0.00003062778,0.00003465839,0.00005055758,0.01336615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823691,0.006087322,0.0023039968,0.0019909178,0.0056410525,0.0016076438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8236463,0.13909334,0.009524668,0.0036278209,0.014159755,0.009948149],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025191449,0.00037649355,0.0010537299,0.0020285356,0.0070837797,0.012043516,0.0020710072,0.052675486,0.0057119057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16474135,0.0006169622,0.00060364814,0.0035213614,0.0108131785,0.010368461,0.0032814778,0.03299963,0.003594065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018510639,0.000024880545,0.0032930358,0.000073973344,0.000023309623,0.0012606833,0.002073094,0.000038125636,0.00012103171,0.023579752,0.94982046,0.019506564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023912621,0.00007242604,0.011336537,0.0007538148,0.00006564673,0.0017062685,0.0068089315,0.0004962632,0.00055175205,0.06036584,0.9174513,0.00015194135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020285035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03845278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009605264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01168896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1332267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244701","doi":"10.2200/s00624ed1v01y201501icr039","title":"Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Information retrieval; Data mining; Library science; World Wide Web; Social media","score_opus":0.18781506921347418,"score_gpt":0.47355070394287563,"score_spread":0.28573563472940144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211244701","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13142408,0.01355786,0.7579032,0.0072139427,0.0012156718,0.00044560368,0.018020714,0.02777175,0.04244714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43470493,0.009538824,0.5259113,0.00017988365,0.0008338115,0.0006412469,0.0092265,0.0024825446,0.016480938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991897,0.00026134375,0.00009075185,0.0001264586,0.00027094607,0.000060822767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995719,0.0021475726,0.0004342933,0.0004481968,0.0010906825,0.00016021875],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001596704,0.0010780827,0.00059832196,0.0127966795,0.0008919121,0.004726951,0.00070531043,0.00064672664,0.01865242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00898188,0.00042745497,0.0010055408,0.009584647,0.00038150497,0.0028387993,0.0013530266,0.0009999202,0.0023561844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044705183,0.00014175654,0.008577581,0.002176465,0.00026083115,0.00040445046,0.0013726294,0.041925594,0.038319632,0.09932363,0.05322702,0.75382334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012970499,0.00011157653,0.020301498,0.00075197726,0.00032784848,0.00071135577,0.0011669621,0.5893004,0.0420722,0.19154476,0.1534183,0.00016344448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003017014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028028493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011595738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062398553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212770965","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.6","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Work (physics); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212770965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112097915,0.030379472,0.007156029,0.73938435,0.088928595,0.00013053889,0.00038096734,0.0016548119,0.120775595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25684932,0.033376474,0.009886034,0.3292882,0.10581348,0.00019612952,0.0007125774,0.003487487,0.2603903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.963903,0.007926988,0.0036296519,0.0041505485,0.0181238,0.0022660191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70498204,0.14447093,0.027427819,0.02066367,0.08051895,0.021936614],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026918449,0.00061762315,0.0010383406,0.0023377945,0.004528666,0.018082751,0.0022564298,0.009305101,0.07181971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34795463,0.00083624094,0.00054408284,0.0025243412,0.0076742833,0.013951355,0.0028251265,0.005985605,0.05992271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008002806,0.00004656755,0.0029222579,0.00033156035,0.000034673158,0.0002463388,0.0013044516,0.00007948028,0.00055516645,0.026370734,0.8596083,0.10842045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009272237,0.00006777493,0.003939994,0.000451321,0.0000461195,0.0011573227,0.0021734533,0.00028074117,0.0013191602,0.040707156,0.94967777,0.00008659274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020756708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002775795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98191726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038108826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006238388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24026084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212870265","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04285-x","title":"Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Science policy; Scientometrics; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.4464727771215093,"score_gpt":0.578309172696832,"score_spread":0.13183639557532273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212870265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56851447,0.0053404975,0.005337592,0.34101516,0.00088392757,0.00012920133,0.0023204875,0.00020516085,0.07625348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907079,0.00064502214,0.00039368056,0.0033771645,0.0006807648,0.00005836569,0.0001787568,0.000022588583,0.003935802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662007,0.005171054,0.0007884161,0.001639994,0.0022957337,0.0034848126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7113181,0.20508802,0.031598084,0.0038521811,0.012680959,0.035462715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014254215,0.00033133454,0.0015438969,0.004369616,0.0028166762,0.012245789,0.0019354783,0.00643466,0.025327856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09175562,0.0004692551,0.001180725,0.008219258,0.0045681903,0.008486117,0.003325826,0.0049311672,0.0012238486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029806574,0.0019009773,0.43640283,0.0006345227,0.0011854353,0.00070253207,0.0027075948,0.012707644,0.0018757547,0.44656217,0.032551188,0.059788752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011765703,0.00072360237,0.57037324,0.000582564,0.0008914091,0.0003462113,0.016679455,0.017843388,0.005440699,0.35509014,0.030633923,0.00021879029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020474238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02013092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009520646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012941951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08473015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213005437","doi":"10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1","title":"Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Public Health; University of Toronto; McGill University; Institute for Work & Health; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Receipt; Mega-; Control (management); Peer group; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.850221086539673,"score_gpt":0.6727948306867655,"score_spread":0.1774262558529075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213005437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903826,0.0026686036,0.0010876876,0.0008017268,0.000092427246,0.0001920084,0.00050426065,0.00004791314,0.0042227875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679947,0.0006365537,0.00072236964,0.00014429368,0.00008872144,0.0001270876,0.00022898971,0.000015651367,0.0012368511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672557,0.003916234,0.0025582595,0.0015038098,0.0047377255,0.0005583248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703394,0.029406803,0.06842215,0.003975491,0.017317085,0.010539038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032565,0.00020008079,0.00048921525,0.002088181,0.0008083381,0.0017019251,0.00090757565,0.00054017786,0.0054778536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06833691,0.00023806436,0.00030344343,0.0023751357,0.00068107405,0.0014870011,0.001056788,0.00032765427,0.0015276545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021617785,0.00006495853,0.97191036,0.00041045537,0.00007808624,0.00058903865,0.004778404,0.0000810374,0.0006560434,0.00016562449,0.002275486,0.018774329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002949044,0.0006390486,0.97064555,0.00022882994,0.0000538737,0.0054102126,0.008191098,0.0002471525,0.0004648109,0.00027422825,0.013772195,0.000043561726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016552568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025912272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000653311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022527378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042480767},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4213144810","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.02.003","title":"Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Perspective (graphical); Outcome (game theory); Management science; Conceptual framework; Data science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Social science; Machine learning; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6263016262214871,"score_gpt":0.5878043241387226,"score_spread":0.03849730208276447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213144810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.604968,0.0025309455,0.16349183,0.03883508,0.0008399391,0.0010174388,0.00031281318,0.0005879629,0.18741602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672986,0.0003086235,0.024585048,0.0009873362,0.00009921883,0.00035230402,0.00010670056,0.00010635636,0.0061558397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96235245,0.026677145,0.0013698455,0.0026801187,0.0047591263,0.002161309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71693134,0.23248781,0.0130420085,0.01507854,0.0114649115,0.010995288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05361936,0.0019098977,0.001460087,0.007708917,0.003093463,0.016246978,0.0041565085,0.005529223,0.011573893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24283576,0.0012544325,0.0012927534,0.003082105,0.009153884,0.016873699,0.011614843,0.0046959557,0.0017111844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021817407,0.00077390776,0.07528196,0.00067951094,0.0007026701,0.00040652338,0.026842114,0.006202594,0.0035090107,0.7148729,0.010240709,0.15830638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006075712,0.0005921383,0.018543065,0.00047084343,0.00048228368,0.0002954234,0.024515234,0.05586721,0.0029813268,0.86302954,0.03246941,0.00014586953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028175698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004625075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037700494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059527815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28356963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213208735","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v30n3.1387","title":"Les enjeux de sécurité du partage des données de recherche dans les projets de recherche mettant en collaboration les établissements de recherche publics et le secteur privé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Library science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.7497172807194553,"score_gpt":0.5465070605128733,"score_spread":0.20321022020658197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213208735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4436335,0.029861102,0.058748502,0.2333623,0.0016933695,0.00058001775,0.0014262295,0.00066433067,0.23003067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284379,0.0073154736,0.021985035,0.0052022734,0.0004805401,0.00045034115,0.00054538593,0.00024536494,0.035337623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.82732934,0.10214769,0.008720343,0.008861374,0.045879856,0.0070614773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6081192,0.22239676,0.032397747,0.03903813,0.0829021,0.015146155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17434008,0.00071307056,0.0014950146,0.007112763,0.01175145,0.03151044,0.0024182585,0.003990394,0.007466942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20919827,0.00092829246,0.0011425704,0.013344968,0.0175228,0.015765505,0.010250832,0.006021701,0.0015933271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000551076,0.00018539908,0.081220575,0.0026897967,0.00045851123,0.00096937275,0.18033466,0.0023516556,0.006511969,0.4232,0.022189079,0.2793379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115364666,0.00041580838,0.1890716,0.004255541,0.0003204944,0.0012612512,0.09767624,0.0038558815,0.008056141,0.081666544,0.61300117,0.00030396777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13090186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1584247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0450427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08910335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213306805","doi":"10.17504/protocols.io.b5ddq226","title":"[RETRACTED] Cogni360 Amazon: UK, USA, Australia, South Africa, Canada, NZ (Ingredients Updates) v1","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Geography; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.6397574301341065,"score_gpt":0.5385881968415407,"score_spread":0.10116923329256577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213306805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094747235,0.0011126184,0.0026984273,0.015925286,0.029477896,0.0008359537,0.23002718,0.042604808,0.6763704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025921222,0.00060960266,0.0027370541,0.0050883982,0.0017121972,0.00033177453,0.06236809,0.017802387,0.9067584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976948,0.00012143036,0.00012639469,0.00021119662,0.0014611185,0.00038504062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872643,0.0011453475,0.0002898069,0.0019320946,0.0076523037,0.0017162451],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025472208,0.0016275281,0.0016914287,0.00544866,0.0028181432,0.009859896,0.004334322,0.0035568685,0.8143355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024318561,0.0016155089,0.0018293991,0.0072587803,0.001095165,0.0064220144,0.0042822547,0.0034579046,0.7674804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015131184,0.000005736401,0.00003948273,0.000045877798,0.0000018987221,0.000009390894,0.0000093780145,0.0000067786978,0.00004542558,0.00012953533,0.9947395,0.004951857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023751547,0.0000070285273,0.00074440724,0.00006985403,0.0000046645782,0.000016127371,0.000032767726,0.000056223314,0.00013194693,0.00044012524,0.99845684,0.000016333262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09442894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19157532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18566447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034765287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006094601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26482785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214484734","doi":"10.1101/2022.02.24.22271416","title":"Mapping publication outputs, collaboration networks, research hotspots, and most cited articles in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of medicine and health sciences in Ethiopia: analyses of 20 years of scientific data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; PsycINFO; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Library science; Medicine; Scopus; Family medicine; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9403878692025578,"score_gpt":0.6835090594380469,"score_spread":0.25687880976451094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214484734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51954937,0.39688253,0.009748923,0.0026017888,0.0004002931,0.002708391,0.0646669,0.00022049635,0.003221219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8804957,0.07908965,0.019936902,0.0004342925,0.00028706706,0.005604339,0.01372105,0.00007995075,0.00035102156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93362474,0.0259464,0.02502022,0.005690285,0.008321643,0.0013967656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7711644,0.15919591,0.04890465,0.005493665,0.013797012,0.0014443235],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055626843,0.0015809633,0.005330352,0.113946795,0.0013882609,0.006048878,0.0017307263,0.0011115957,0.002674341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14965051,0.0010493401,0.010196327,0.11968585,0.0010626039,0.0046453015,0.0056504994,0.0009265706,0.0002725662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012171246,0.00016182124,0.5089379,0.25742006,0.11812664,0.00089171523,0.005868384,0.002848505,0.0013838838,0.0022144082,0.0037788094,0.097150646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053136644,0.00073247,0.7343212,0.07360504,0.14920422,0.0014434756,0.009446726,0.0036300933,0.0020942823,0.0051277713,0.019575808,0.00028755015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052725463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008245151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8860532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031773672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007595781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29418635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214763904","doi":"10.1007/s12630-022-02211-6","title":"An open-source toolkit to assist authors and collaborators during manuscript preparation: AuthorAndCollaborator toolkit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open source; Computer science; Software engineering; World Wide Web; Library science; Programming language; Software","score_opus":0.1362915956851598,"score_gpt":0.4056556851371322,"score_spread":0.2693640894519724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214763904","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033626028,0.0038785387,0.37298054,0.22080047,0.032910988,0.013685072,0.05990326,0.2221168,0.07036179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013735141,0.0035923836,0.7146656,0.03659324,0.008906513,0.028642152,0.02612527,0.058935717,0.108804114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90505314,0.04840433,0.02039866,0.0040427675,0.019379565,0.002721539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30195603,0.45930964,0.02968803,0.07081883,0.1055049,0.03272263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10417939,0.0026297385,0.0040539047,0.012973342,0.0033342626,0.012177791,0.007340015,0.0073406924,0.19882594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40321496,0.004416556,0.0029160522,0.009092397,0.0028406964,0.012163247,0.022270555,0.011583373,0.20334408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027875084,0.00011814393,0.0004942638,0.0014484529,0.00007068617,0.00040288098,0.0012708007,0.00017263868,0.0010590188,0.0023849178,0.8864672,0.10583229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006156148,0.00007769053,0.0014856275,0.0017596859,0.00007819629,0.00069014763,0.0008765248,0.001627105,0.0012124373,0.01892872,0.972306,0.00034231792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002579195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009375445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026506041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037429668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.665139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220726663","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7yuje","title":"Favouring Responsible Publishing: Creating a Database of Researchers and Surveying Their Knowledge, Attitudes and Opinions towards Open Access Publishing and a New Field-Specific Journal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Snowball sampling; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.8888730633324748,"score_gpt":0.6516371918486598,"score_spread":0.2372358714838151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220726663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84698796,0.008846601,0.012790123,0.0079191355,0.00035028494,0.03236309,0.06644532,0.0007138337,0.023583567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6595131,0.01662238,0.1792214,0.005743837,0.0005809742,0.08653528,0.04246005,0.00030675967,0.009016129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93989944,0.018125448,0.020921696,0.00561179,0.0136301955,0.0018114692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.658329,0.18235716,0.08435826,0.01900348,0.0458598,0.010092272],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061564807,0.0004832775,0.0017767595,0.026744064,0.0040588537,0.009226463,0.0030865446,0.0022725577,0.0064367726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16573761,0.001198613,0.0011679712,0.026320312,0.0020257016,0.00979464,0.006707141,0.0014792876,0.0033241967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009692,0.0010275927,0.4487485,0.02095579,0.00033463875,0.0019386986,0.13203283,0.00033258728,0.0046849735,0.0032765183,0.04249765,0.343201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005530954,0.001863411,0.34906825,0.01723337,0.0008570845,0.0024737774,0.28292093,0.0025185274,0.004432936,0.003540945,0.33396524,0.0005724478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049864273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009155471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99691343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003310004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01635215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32558972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220877524","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04338-1","title":"Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time window","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Window (computing); Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation impact; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.2744588650714582,"score_gpt":0.5399536004006232,"score_spread":0.265494735329165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220877524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94662327,0.009711983,0.01006535,0.0042857626,0.0005085387,0.00005644378,0.0009975221,0.00027161313,0.027479498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956802,0.0012305006,0.0005579129,0.00009557352,0.00029071112,0.000016119451,0.00020086797,0.00008252667,0.0018455796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969747,0.0010350087,0.00028173934,0.0005855132,0.000721801,0.00040122552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7951998,0.17541324,0.013157785,0.005458707,0.0042320103,0.0065385024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012467988,0.0005266191,0.001440115,0.0036008388,0.0010136516,0.0077808197,0.0010543007,0.0018570104,0.010069493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13644318,0.00036210922,0.00095354405,0.008150267,0.0011479509,0.009881978,0.0026063405,0.0025524963,0.0011616079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009082827,0.001856961,0.56646246,0.0012283996,0.0025345823,0.001829209,0.004556459,0.033569068,0.013976797,0.13761805,0.008517084,0.21876813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045228127,0.0008998658,0.7614185,0.00030135078,0.0023177587,0.00059823575,0.0030508086,0.041864127,0.0045578615,0.17438501,0.009971966,0.00018222693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002678023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001426982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99639916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006388653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015693741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06593788},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4220945597","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/nduxf","title":"Transforming excellence? From ‘matter of fact’ to ‘matter of concern’ in research funding organizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Austrian Science Fund; Fondazione Telethon; Wellcome Trust; European Molecular Biology Organization; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Michael Smith Health Research BC; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Meritocracy; Political science; Competition (biology); Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.7943442517530959,"score_gpt":0.6306071583946641,"score_spread":0.16373709335843178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220945597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5838802,0.010238438,0.04597977,0.19475812,0.0008572947,0.00014078255,0.000055702163,0.00015678251,0.16393287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941355,0.0006286122,0.002316664,0.001716969,0.00014546076,0.000043423886,0.000009051407,0.000029756471,0.00097455987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85753894,0.10906952,0.0049684737,0.005550874,0.01644463,0.0064275283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.854089,0.087522276,0.023225622,0.012409499,0.012600917,0.010152756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10564526,0.00034697994,0.0012941961,0.004838372,0.014324832,0.033909146,0.001685586,0.004995224,0.0020604725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14701326,0.00037416018,0.00055991794,0.007341284,0.06828177,0.029929997,0.019088814,0.0047351755,0.00037478688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082975355,0.000049504342,0.013475862,0.00024462002,0.000038186918,0.00021188863,0.15121575,0.00043912136,0.00049848494,0.78266066,0.0029462844,0.048136607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004662307,0.000116601426,0.014299933,0.000755748,0.000052723957,0.00028581673,0.15009384,0.000925033,0.000752497,0.7017574,0.13081193,0.000101820646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030062033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022362906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018647278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01812297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55871224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221006456","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265545","title":"The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Publishing; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data source; Data science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Database","score_opus":0.867593310351548,"score_gpt":0.6062681864720891,"score_spread":0.26132512387945883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221006456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951507,0.018684575,0.024265107,0.0097167995,0.00030666962,0.0006855118,0.0047492827,0.00011243508,0.046328817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985372,0.0028221067,0.009349763,0.00040392112,0.00010616161,0.00040944078,0.0011769902,0.0000702444,0.00028932313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6894768,0.18210989,0.039637197,0.009540506,0.076650396,0.002585259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.127188,0.738411,0.07728188,0.030460019,0.024183372,0.0024758046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16866899,0.00057394913,0.0014127835,0.022575717,0.0019892429,0.014793279,0.0018091731,0.0010377483,0.0019494559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61093116,0.00052930234,0.0018748448,0.060982853,0.0066625853,0.013210162,0.013716481,0.0016515119,0.00031702724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008952502,0.00012737175,0.82685345,0.003734324,0.002675086,0.00013900295,0.015885627,0.00076961727,0.00070498826,0.027654191,0.0015179238,0.11904313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096478536,0.00033716092,0.9177148,0.004778734,0.0011772092,0.0007022174,0.021770228,0.0024894583,0.0014857643,0.029909082,0.019337434,0.00020152258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036954223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038706686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031576678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004289741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8920175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221059829","doi":"10.2196/34258","title":"A Platform (Authorships.org) for the Objective Qualification and Order of Academic Authorship in Medical and Science Journals: Development and Evaluation Study Using the Design Science Research Methodology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; Universität des Saarlandes; Universidade de Macau; Universitätsspital Zürich; Universität St. Gallen; Rush University; University of Notre Dame; Universität Basel; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Usability; Order (exchange); Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Medical science; Software; Medical education; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.9672570135581235,"score_gpt":0.7727262080040803,"score_spread":0.19453080555404323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221059829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8388664,0.0005506393,0.08514512,0.0008778634,0.00032710578,0.06059742,0.0020902671,0.0018160815,0.009729052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5181541,0.0004810197,0.41610178,0.0003397753,0.0001314952,0.058266252,0.0030911146,0.00047307246,0.002961464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94834936,0.033963215,0.005443165,0.002036132,0.009002626,0.0012055654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.778087,0.1583863,0.013341823,0.008474632,0.034275558,0.007434739],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09139007,0.0012874466,0.001051128,0.006640355,0.0015421214,0.004060639,0.0013194934,0.001597469,0.004512002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11911227,0.000895268,0.0019272362,0.0036806571,0.0021965967,0.0049282014,0.0051618586,0.0013561544,0.0011109086],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01190527,0.018178081,0.11204889,0.00744419,0.00067711796,0.00059346773,0.015962161,0.0069883857,0.014306529,0.009583087,0.011706559,0.7906063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0244942,0.12813042,0.52078605,0.0071596396,0.0032691495,0.001798172,0.0345373,0.09833303,0.052167963,0.020325169,0.10791842,0.0010804548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006996058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007835302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99840254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025398894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009739645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48332268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221093307","doi":"10.18438/eblip30015","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions and Experiences with an Open Access Subvention Fund","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Publication; Publishing; Public relations; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.6818213490106133,"score_gpt":0.610621507825644,"score_spread":0.07119984118496936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221093307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815229,0.001131867,0.0010227003,0.006189637,0.00018007174,0.000084205145,0.000062994186,0.000035723933,0.009769976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440295,0.00095979526,0.0007976504,0.0011054891,0.00010935635,0.000083308565,0.00003633205,0.000020703095,0.002484426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450627,0.041432727,0.0025309098,0.0014975731,0.005791239,0.0036848602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88384086,0.063007005,0.020305859,0.0046270387,0.0108234575,0.017395766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040226676,0.00037771586,0.0007513851,0.0018026644,0.008145859,0.0123868,0.0018839425,0.0022833755,0.0062201777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09098616,0.0006092855,0.00075133535,0.0019442589,0.0072323047,0.0077690776,0.010675326,0.0025400997,0.000764985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000160019,0.0002640971,0.057767022,0.00045855073,0.000055023433,0.0013677086,0.90851915,0.000098817734,0.0010843751,0.0034511606,0.0032331406,0.023540992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014272039,0.00029098874,0.010142649,0.00020383684,0.000019240288,0.00067553367,0.9645649,0.000107593885,0.0002986488,0.00053303596,0.023114039,0.000035166064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033727586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034291202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031237851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006339441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21274155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223446648","doi":"10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0","title":"Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMC Research Notes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Advanced Research Projects Agency; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Expert elicitation; Transparency (behavior); Constructive; Process (computing); Computer science; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Best practice; Technical peer review; Data science; Knowledge management; Management science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer security; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9135037421991614,"score_gpt":0.7274531204333806,"score_spread":0.1860506217657808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223446648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006753252,0.0038173927,0.14932746,0.77553314,0.03154645,0.0024641324,0.00011385396,0.00088881253,0.029555444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16884735,0.008443224,0.27390686,0.45095363,0.054219034,0.0076520178,0.00021760496,0.0009976891,0.03476251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.44119072,0.3950407,0.029804904,0.01702122,0.112576306,0.004366178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23702009,0.5215947,0.0344113,0.08587865,0.11324779,0.007847474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33419666,0.0012212482,0.0017400549,0.0032114936,0.008169838,0.019899147,0.0064826095,0.02548506,0.005123143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6378071,0.0014225588,0.0022030314,0.0027974157,0.0205684,0.019640133,0.013544351,0.03197373,0.00993639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005649347,0.00021261426,0.0025032966,0.0024407809,0.00019972368,0.0024184217,0.024878673,0.0017389874,0.0061768778,0.2128779,0.45068157,0.2953063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023845794,0.0002777572,0.001652392,0.0024578038,0.00008257989,0.0017672481,0.003388059,0.0059807817,0.003395078,0.19563217,0.78482115,0.0003065162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028471234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005379121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0115105575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02548179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8210541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223650565","doi":"10.1016/j.tibs.2022.03.012","title":"Moms in Proteomics: building a supportive and unified community together","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Biochemical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Proteomics; Field (mathematics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.566908889401357,"score_gpt":0.5752766945790945,"score_spread":0.008367805177737497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223650565","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13670288,0.01090337,0.548507,0.16299342,0.0050213244,0.0012479536,0.0006315422,0.0065955855,0.12739697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64554334,0.0035726011,0.2965841,0.009754317,0.0035656556,0.001204526,0.0011664572,0.0011971452,0.037411977],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676931,0.0188329,0.0014252741,0.0029954996,0.0072306087,0.0018226552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407649,0.018227603,0.0040968694,0.012035732,0.009630716,0.015244191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03969158,0.00078968384,0.0014880798,0.009779069,0.0075749895,0.016153904,0.004684421,0.0044403644,0.011687049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073582284,0.0011521297,0.0010785635,0.0057668537,0.0055644154,0.028208135,0.03465589,0.004071524,0.0062379274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002171831,0.0007467051,0.018197749,0.00095482316,0.000374368,0.00086558406,0.026319377,0.0016937345,0.005206031,0.2926121,0.07645829,0.5763541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080245685,0.00025530646,0.005937916,0.0008184943,0.00012406526,0.00042413853,0.018814147,0.008708864,0.0019121688,0.5648931,0.3979028,0.00012870468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007517174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011542564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001922684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086055305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20991164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223985358","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265831","title":"Cumulative advantage and citation performance of repeat authors in scholarly journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Strasbourg; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Arizona; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Incentive; Citation analysis; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Library science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.7104620148666267,"score_gpt":0.5418942692396382,"score_spread":0.1685677456269885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223985358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936248,0.0012529701,0.0008471106,0.00022771728,0.000025097213,0.000008277746,0.00029619687,0.000024184854,0.0036936316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985929,0.0002103571,0.00022851607,0.000015637088,0.00007203831,0.000004366868,0.00019804954,0.0000058077076,0.0006723721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965838,0.00070240797,0.0005284194,0.00062869716,0.0011840736,0.00037252626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8847836,0.05212097,0.045474745,0.0060184184,0.006644685,0.004957561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004960849,0.00019717732,0.0006212898,0.0074268086,0.00086805876,0.0031989266,0.0004936756,0.0007582552,0.0028143332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052355964,0.00012100773,0.00046930072,0.00898073,0.0013567848,0.00275757,0.0018001966,0.0005613265,0.0008094123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012044106,0.0000430166,0.97695166,0.00009446353,0.00018411769,0.00015238933,0.0010312274,0.00080114364,0.0009028015,0.0017840507,0.00039547976,0.017539186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013522233,0.00015505277,0.9890113,0.000040457457,0.000113131224,0.00039856616,0.0010474505,0.0012567459,0.0009742562,0.004871144,0.0020887544,0.000029654688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011847962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024684079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99503917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008724561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062541227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026235819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224283948","doi":"10.3390/knowledge2020013","title":"The Rise of Platinum Open Access Journals with Both Impact Factors and Zero Article Processing Charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Citation; Scholarly communication; Open science; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6456818896578179,"score_gpt":0.6366664748306502,"score_spread":0.009015414827167723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224283948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28172776,0.008599317,0.12929967,0.021851419,0.0090738125,0.0016216601,0.11440836,0.054208525,0.37920952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48947322,0.0089753475,0.2884776,0.006097026,0.0051845135,0.0014837846,0.086052336,0.01718019,0.09707598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612452,0.0038861264,0.0034335065,0.0029775014,0.027139775,0.001317843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87154496,0.038420253,0.027724897,0.015465873,0.035917796,0.010926191],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014727949,0.0010003581,0.0014796116,0.017553333,0.0018870295,0.015057126,0.0017427665,0.0009370659,0.04034317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1391667,0.00091554876,0.0016315108,0.05376873,0.001673561,0.010798311,0.0056610866,0.0027806775,0.020573538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008466497,0.00038355708,0.14914358,0.004867185,0.0006660203,0.0013430027,0.0028006602,0.0022159186,0.009122274,0.06974024,0.28886676,0.4700041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019170826,0.00020176951,0.1243323,0.00083997473,0.00036856267,0.0018725414,0.0011990272,0.0056327847,0.0074629923,0.051864248,0.80579656,0.0002376107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003345844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042883423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034000734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006892467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1349613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224316587","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059445","title":"Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ottawa Hospital; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Cross-sectional study; Protocol (science); Environmental health; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.7721978534082363,"score_gpt":0.7632492341181518,"score_spread":0.008948619290084503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224316587","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155301355,0.00020004532,0.0028902264,0.00038857933,0.000091043155,0.97582793,0.003195827,0.000081014,0.0017951531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068088025,0.00018289329,0.003537142,0.00028641822,0.000032797747,0.9875853,0.0008484543,0.000011193702,0.0007069401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96641344,0.013757723,0.009270006,0.0030802176,0.0052122804,0.002266343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196851,0.026231714,0.015599465,0.007822009,0.025244987,0.0054167346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1012754,0.0024497432,0.0038355975,0.009371553,0.0050996877,0.005316669,0.0038242382,0.004469685,0.043900874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062607355,0.004216443,0.002865402,0.0062087346,0.0040992633,0.0077706473,0.0043812403,0.005273399,0.019483602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07914781,0.078594044,0.20529345,0.07208477,0.0015611101,0.0048229992,0.058934547,0.0063163666,0.007742828,0.03344428,0.14020999,0.31184787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037522305,0.08114608,0.38790166,0.030160295,0.0015553575,0.0020995005,0.05904542,0.009680257,0.008027255,0.019596415,0.36192557,0.0013398848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037758565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055534234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009517517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03533704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5356019},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"protocol","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"protocol","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4225140398","doi":"10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7","title":"China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Political science; Science policy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Higher education; Citation; Citation impact; Position (finance); Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8411194510935742,"score_gpt":0.6756913006516972,"score_spread":0.16542815044187698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225140398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3132778,0.013465828,0.002443999,0.6113872,0.0030402024,0.00026382692,0.0015060675,0.0002698373,0.05434535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93789333,0.0015846575,0.0011553034,0.048488434,0.0012412623,0.00015420801,0.0004073731,0.000038151837,0.00903729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715594,0.009693986,0.0015549484,0.0024930916,0.007256407,0.007442177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575619,0.012768398,0.0052766777,0.0031967696,0.013895228,0.0073009226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04128028,0.00065745716,0.0017858307,0.004985703,0.0048464215,0.0127261225,0.0026262153,0.00698908,0.008132836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050516985,0.00037564838,0.00151136,0.0057483334,0.007578428,0.006236198,0.0045023873,0.0045624156,0.0005423713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010304402,0.000615834,0.1492235,0.0016736353,0.0012781266,0.0010070308,0.004950801,0.0040208544,0.0024917969,0.5701472,0.119878665,0.14368214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012260596,0.0010283263,0.62311023,0.0015898494,0.0012237431,0.00033805857,0.00857381,0.008795914,0.0047269757,0.09566991,0.25324118,0.0004759145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14165738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15002759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95871973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029092358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07844502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28166568},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4225634029","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4066511","title":"Scholar Metrics Scraper (Sms): Automated Retrieval of Citation and Author Data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scraper site; Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Data mining; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.444686786635901,"score_gpt":0.5439794446972804,"score_spread":0.09929265806137944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225634029","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14543162,0.0033257946,0.11278108,0.002381123,0.0013216764,0.002482311,0.23213135,0.46780416,0.03234099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27173668,0.0020180813,0.33335492,0.0013624037,0.0014796723,0.0022939697,0.3041259,0.017847769,0.06578054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645895,0.00076711545,0.00047988794,0.00043952404,0.001601168,0.0002534242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870832,0.0043371283,0.0021294993,0.0020148642,0.0033971486,0.0010382503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003147647,0.0015333301,0.0015641057,0.0154498005,0.0007831018,0.0024730442,0.0013686729,0.001008515,0.023572415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019869609,0.00074008724,0.000793593,0.011210766,0.0002394,0.0025849494,0.002877913,0.00079054857,0.027964573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013260052,0.0005040807,0.011158893,0.001558077,0.0004215722,0.00035210443,0.0008215777,0.0008362715,0.019225966,0.0018631956,0.42865163,0.53328055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023047097,0.0018662069,0.11118873,0.0006822699,0.0008345545,0.0015867797,0.002054087,0.11590771,0.12874973,0.01249796,0.6216175,0.00070977694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005429093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011375483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99685234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005762678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026847073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0788576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226007804","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6128264","title":"Statistics on the papers published in the Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences from 2007 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Statistics; Data science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27967595202343104,"score_gpt":0.40158938821890844,"score_spread":0.1219134361954774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226007804","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01264038,0.17707694,0.0017446266,0.016565675,0.015135583,0.00071955693,0.64488286,0.0021626302,0.12907171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10169964,0.24861844,0.004939013,0.013036602,0.010303504,0.0021681024,0.4753152,0.0015025306,0.14241698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544781,0.0017604919,0.005686814,0.0018611851,0.03384312,0.0023702595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7958897,0.017602509,0.021652164,0.0031770146,0.15001434,0.0116642555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009358339,0.0015033158,0.0026005805,0.054515403,0.0036683292,0.008993967,0.002233644,0.0014556936,0.038809787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07275723,0.0006205152,0.0027615724,0.080885015,0.0015972668,0.0028427893,0.0023858142,0.002837779,0.022637988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042788312,0.000034087523,0.020157399,0.0070549943,0.0004892214,0.00021358614,0.00023904639,0.0003725323,0.0004704175,0.0049716653,0.8890106,0.07655847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079107,0.00007181176,0.08025154,0.0021501728,0.00039606704,0.0005256499,0.00048419184,0.00027615426,0.00049635815,0.0008161342,0.91432047,0.00013230089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43444192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4084435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99064165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017394457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05380706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8638264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226020442","doi":"","title":"Co-authorship Networks of Iranian Researchers' Publications on the Field of Management during a Half-Century (1969-2018)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Data science; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.821830678411475,"score_gpt":0.7113600348276967,"score_spread":0.11047064358377823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226020442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656753,0.013810447,0.0006834069,0.0012396387,0.00013500218,0.000039347946,0.002925945,0.000043746193,0.015447075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99197245,0.0042935284,0.00074078195,0.00004710477,0.0001521489,0.000029780887,0.0010612506,0.000008343192,0.0016945433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812895,0.000267472,0.00034169402,0.0002812696,0.00077639846,0.00020425033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98924935,0.0031606725,0.004339367,0.0003946879,0.0023526629,0.0005031928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002821157,0.00022995134,0.0003276455,0.017514963,0.00077320467,0.0019063179,0.00035770136,0.000336724,0.002001374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013440483,0.00009637902,0.00038041835,0.019542847,0.00047118225,0.0019298925,0.0010661102,0.00026253102,0.00037046164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026285884,0.00004214385,0.6373506,0.001361617,0.00022048657,0.000896316,0.032846805,0.0008876683,0.0014497655,0.0041470956,0.0064802417,0.31405437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000846717,0.00005632044,0.9414539,0.00038545963,0.00012880325,0.0010508791,0.014058879,0.00085551734,0.0010879961,0.0013398333,0.039539408,0.000034707748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004774472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062468895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99717885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013159215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019336306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014919937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226144900","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j5zyk","title":"POWER, EMERGENCE, AND THE MEANINGS OF RESISTANCE: OPEN ACCESS SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING IN CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Resistance (ecology); Rationality; Power (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6161184908163654,"score_gpt":0.5859941965470766,"score_spread":0.030124294269288754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226144900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7722239,0.004129679,0.0016060786,0.06978285,0.0002538717,0.00014354028,0.00015807948,0.000051932835,0.1516501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916973,0.0010036305,0.00032896025,0.0015846073,0.000023500706,0.000024888346,0.000026091519,0.000023120876,0.005287889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96703815,0.0073123993,0.0011285411,0.00227135,0.015503434,0.0067460705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938996,0.026871437,0.005125057,0.0014736857,0.014892671,0.012641164],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01258672,0.00046270504,0.0010507306,0.0056410017,0.07224984,0.032838523,0.0034836098,0.004122396,0.004098701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045070756,0.00078013365,0.0004924308,0.014437957,0.054618284,0.008946944,0.016733794,0.008679744,0.00029788745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006491973,0.000055851004,0.013894908,0.00011264851,0.000019751647,0.0008712654,0.8947031,0.00016897534,0.00032267612,0.07115468,0.0047842413,0.01384704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003367485,0.00002588602,0.020063503,0.00029018254,0.000026504515,0.00016448405,0.87408596,0.00076704955,0.0002973058,0.014853451,0.08924495,0.00014703016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23920862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27145404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88241017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226227977","doi":"10.5455/aim.2022.30.11-17","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Major Neurosurgical Publications 2011\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"2020, Part 2: Journal, Author, Yearly Publication Trends, and Citation Related Metrics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Informatica Medica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neurosurgery; Bibliometrics; Citation; Scientometrics; Medicine; Science Citation Index; Impact factor; Altmetrics; Pediatric neurosurgery; Library science; Political science; Surgery; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.36364441246250995,"score_gpt":0.4936006333206119,"score_spread":0.12995622085810193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226227977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8628304,0.010905658,0.0038985056,0.0022701232,0.00030740595,0.0003774921,0.07125475,0.0007401758,0.04741536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507405,0.006334939,0.0036616102,0.00009650025,0.00029084604,0.00026748475,0.032415476,0.000067353576,0.006125301],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368435,0.00094573497,0.0011819376,0.00039929769,0.0034513865,0.00033732847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98258543,0.005356324,0.0044825245,0.000701551,0.006224319,0.0006498014],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045702164,0.0004821249,0.00090359355,0.08432692,0.001135747,0.0033937194,0.00074675167,0.00045598045,0.006872134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026651878,0.00016371615,0.001325644,0.1095519,0.00052649115,0.0015181025,0.0015447728,0.00038971865,0.002267636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000292824,0.00020841687,0.71759146,0.002762065,0.0008900694,0.0003258685,0.0015311921,0.0029047113,0.0010864402,0.0038752484,0.035082087,0.23344967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018030145,0.00008749833,0.96029973,0.00045982792,0.00039252662,0.00044071482,0.0017744724,0.0044839215,0.001505253,0.0010555667,0.029426152,0.000056327473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022623153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02130633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9156731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003913006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005755775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04498297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226265987","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20221063","title":"Ranking and Selection from Pairwise Comparisons: Empirical Bayes Methods for Citation Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Bayes' theorem; Nonparametric statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Citation; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Library science","score_opus":0.5529145655658193,"score_gpt":0.6077205054801893,"score_spread":0.054805939914369994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226265987","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016790654,0.0012333032,0.99560744,0.0001964027,0.00009268033,0.00014857286,0.00007975598,0.00018827061,0.0007744984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10500372,0.0020904688,0.8872945,0.0003078344,0.00069962535,0.0018536529,0.0006645464,0.00030257052,0.0017831369],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9197844,0.06628721,0.0018046488,0.0030658934,0.008582568,0.00047520344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8405578,0.14594215,0.0031298606,0.005116081,0.004725162,0.0005289839],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05908376,0.002575047,0.004673076,0.011040866,0.0018526624,0.0038831132,0.0034541734,0.0023592622,0.0034260643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1933662,0.0010790485,0.0031507188,0.0109389275,0.002762761,0.005608148,0.002658421,0.004745195,0.0015598246],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025474105,0.00023013046,0.005033467,0.0010544469,0.0012251948,0.00025100974,0.00071168813,0.11076234,0.0006853837,0.29599023,0.007033525,0.5767678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008653122,0.00008301532,0.0012153579,0.00016863311,0.00014369065,0.00012969389,0.0000949259,0.37120152,0.00056236936,0.6199468,0.006272484,0.000094952426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033778034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036951064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98895913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017996029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00281358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31246853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226317078","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265506","title":"The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Collegiality; Promotion (chess); Discipline; Academic institution; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Pedagogy; Social science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6227565319145993,"score_gpt":0.5294402482117014,"score_spread":0.0933162837028979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226317078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88405967,0.016497036,0.013518585,0.02254526,0.0007535453,0.0007555512,0.00022291014,0.00028230235,0.06136516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032027,0.0016355858,0.0042713396,0.000903155,0.0008142535,0.00020500016,0.00008672723,0.000043197502,0.0017205802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.73977757,0.15215647,0.025504827,0.007912372,0.06740724,0.007241514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18428375,0.5350034,0.17063577,0.021321744,0.055687655,0.03306764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15747388,0.00039327497,0.0010373079,0.027133945,0.017587004,0.017797096,0.003596373,0.002356338,0.0025088883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5448656,0.000799835,0.0006952613,0.019941207,0.012628224,0.012507055,0.011029975,0.003449207,0.0007076885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045921473,0.0006096745,0.39251512,0.0026113244,0.00032793975,0.0011011646,0.13352977,0.0005470964,0.0024362314,0.026732903,0.009153966,0.4299756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011920208,0.0011555704,0.8377315,0.0019418412,0.00015605276,0.0016260596,0.06089626,0.0013823768,0.0020325251,0.027216373,0.06512926,0.0006130288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076855887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016164698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84252614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012614373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023805013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8328114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229000435","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0268110","title":"Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6494989492659259,"score_gpt":0.5132583067132458,"score_spread":0.1362406425526801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229000435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96163374,0.0011104234,0.007325563,0.0015871266,0.00022991211,0.0021451788,0.0041888105,0.00018108245,0.021598112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95766467,0.0022485466,0.02360198,0.0009522962,0.00023400625,0.0027999151,0.0038583116,0.00018226913,0.008458008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796814,0.0009801463,0.00015263572,0.00014873792,0.0005535947,0.0001967179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95560247,0.032358874,0.003889159,0.00063993316,0.0062369755,0.0012726863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004509581,0.0003261244,0.00020771309,0.0038253083,0.0008870161,0.0016647165,0.0004405483,0.0005928727,0.002933332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04906903,0.0001606279,0.0002551954,0.0021562807,0.0007727046,0.0016610253,0.0010001876,0.0007896955,0.00054561277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010059216,0.00090026524,0.1360019,0.0049383226,0.00008951631,0.0032748375,0.2864232,0.00060402113,0.012369738,0.0034466193,0.046813264,0.5041324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061991894,0.001230231,0.58030325,0.005117889,0.00011971105,0.0023425592,0.21478014,0.0034534172,0.006442345,0.0023014627,0.18363026,0.00021672921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058180257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011723351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022366897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016213445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023849249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229508554","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3735696","title":"Cite Unseen: Theory and Evidence on the Effect of Open Access on Cites to Academic Articles Across the Quality Spectrum","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Quality (philosophy); Spectrum (functional analysis); Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.5981246267925501,"score_gpt":0.645494564475156,"score_spread":0.04736993768260589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229508554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88562787,0.02502865,0.010946477,0.016563766,0.00073549047,0.00008961996,0.0016443174,0.00026117696,0.059102666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939545,0.0021741234,0.0005639717,0.00076551805,0.00053312094,0.000018055012,0.00024767598,0.000038634164,0.0017044119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98624563,0.0049196417,0.00090391136,0.0024912588,0.004338775,0.0011008346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4592167,0.4449138,0.054481503,0.017390713,0.012747688,0.011249596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024512317,0.00059872324,0.0017746498,0.010493175,0.003301357,0.010144311,0.0026871096,0.0036960104,0.020911427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22279955,0.00044235974,0.0015753732,0.013463556,0.009362346,0.017221715,0.005297174,0.0044280733,0.0015357579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003922525,0.0023341265,0.6999917,0.0016853025,0.0039864467,0.0007763685,0.0063215634,0.0059222993,0.0017651664,0.12658228,0.008000165,0.138712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060329254,0.00096892775,0.6459556,0.00058924087,0.0022083977,0.0004213971,0.0055223554,0.0075741247,0.0021719704,0.3236208,0.010162714,0.00020109875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008917046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067807827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98950684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021829335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013796273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230147137","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/1865/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Declaration; Impact factor; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7123738018518166,"score_gpt":0.5734078603725448,"score_spread":0.13896594147927188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230147137","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034035838,0.023944091,0.086712465,0.20276664,0.35872984,0.02089811,0.017910201,0.009065818,0.27656925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04831793,0.029206332,0.16890544,0.08450421,0.12017907,0.033311438,0.030140232,0.015989074,0.4694463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8237405,0.054742895,0.027305968,0.019713532,0.068198465,0.0062986454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36434823,0.07085462,0.026969088,0.09366353,0.422198,0.021966526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09329951,0.003063497,0.0046175933,0.007927603,0.0064493334,0.032181475,0.008888924,0.012031789,0.15438682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41233754,0.0020049498,0.0026249653,0.006664921,0.008388609,0.01217911,0.009973678,0.020602357,0.18971154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014438841,0.00006639152,0.00030189913,0.0020175641,0.000069451766,0.00032350165,0.001370588,0.00009634728,0.00077354786,0.017743995,0.90138566,0.07570657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034929755,0.000026469963,0.0002609842,0.002029484,0.00002349595,0.00034337086,0.00045958612,0.000096873526,0.00027871932,0.0051398417,0.99127346,0.00003273514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010914505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015356994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054224078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060813103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5164753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230240615","doi":"10.13021/g8z883","title":"Report from the Participation in the Current System Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Incentive; Publishing; Public relations; Perception; Current (fluid); Political science; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7439589407594891,"score_gpt":0.6102823415491192,"score_spread":0.1336765992103699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230240615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033947,0.0003518504,0.003718653,0.017369365,0.0033203536,0.0031349652,0.06487254,0.0007500178,0.20308752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6041378,0.00071476947,0.0037733244,0.0042062355,0.0019288933,0.006336528,0.044296082,0.00037410922,0.33423236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906379,0.002713919,0.00048613988,0.0006275783,0.0037848535,0.001749547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939872,0.013653143,0.006393954,0.0064878995,0.022664635,0.010928302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009138676,0.00071664585,0.0004706669,0.003823332,0.0048854756,0.003971783,0.0012707829,0.0020839414,0.06072137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030282455,0.0003835005,0.00073608296,0.002963963,0.0009530517,0.0018016342,0.004711978,0.0028951506,0.025904858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026353323,0.005352785,0.38969427,0.00077972666,0.00020681882,0.0014240494,0.031909537,0.0004695739,0.0060586003,0.005082302,0.3946413,0.16174574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013326557,0.0013700025,0.65484643,0.00019593441,0.000102255355,0.00027729734,0.060348846,0.0005023158,0.00498158,0.0014429699,0.27564928,0.00014977378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0150495265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016241964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99617666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015162571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039106105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20313323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230371363","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Publication; Reading (process); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230371363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81288666,0.023519589,0.036911737,0.019381255,0.0031024353,0.0062392037,0.0035296073,0.0008258746,0.093603544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633933,0.002756611,0.025270067,0.001957015,0.0009169222,0.003394138,0.00067565957,0.00018373804,0.0014525598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5590372,0.23917387,0.060851604,0.008891705,0.126011,0.0060346937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1455181,0.5737005,0.119085066,0.01851212,0.1330786,0.0101057105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3424015,0.0010277452,0.00273733,0.040576737,0.0059733386,0.014965554,0.002130786,0.001825565,0.0022171596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70634854,0.0008641441,0.002062047,0.03696473,0.006449315,0.014822322,0.0062736142,0.0032251978,0.00066920184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001425378,0.00072529993,0.3271325,0.011783124,0.0016672426,0.0004741108,0.08085216,0.0010194285,0.0020067536,0.0146771865,0.02443362,0.5338032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004493113,0.003795024,0.7088153,0.01425207,0.0015638538,0.0014740982,0.08451708,0.0064904434,0.0051327916,0.027921226,0.14382145,0.0017673832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069455486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012969257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95942324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016545285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021271756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81093603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231107620","doi":"10.1139/cjc-2015-0198","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.7827645153528499,"score_gpt":0.6103038631569636,"score_spread":0.17246065219588624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231107620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26635715,0.0036491486,0.07859201,0.12707444,0.0040704305,0.00043596353,0.00093597843,0.0026379104,0.5162469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89367557,0.000964117,0.025383642,0.010982373,0.0034551045,0.0002121547,0.00041118046,0.00068141957,0.06423436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95485526,0.0148430895,0.0027960762,0.003927328,0.019496983,0.0040812464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6896807,0.116471365,0.024510024,0.05381417,0.044701897,0.07082177],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034292504,0.00054818025,0.001105811,0.008002093,0.004532677,0.03799935,0.0031755902,0.006177382,0.05585612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19110909,0.00072250067,0.001403082,0.009802617,0.0052077617,0.0389892,0.02326183,0.0049436376,0.011382188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081200566,0.0014540686,0.052088648,0.0007418412,0.0003150284,0.0012275387,0.016448358,0.0017737449,0.007771212,0.33027506,0.069422506,0.51767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048276357,0.00037451246,0.020421783,0.00036459035,0.00019852401,0.0014771402,0.012428853,0.0027097657,0.0036185486,0.6039774,0.35360673,0.00033942584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001808486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046979752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003932576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011817252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18685734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231511862","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v2","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Promotion (chess); Publication; Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Reading (process); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231511862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81288666,0.023519589,0.036911737,0.019381255,0.0031024353,0.0062392037,0.0035296073,0.0008258746,0.093603544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633933,0.002756611,0.025270067,0.001957015,0.0009169222,0.003394138,0.00067565957,0.00018373804,0.0014525598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5590372,0.23917387,0.060851604,0.008891705,0.126011,0.0060346937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1455181,0.5737005,0.119085066,0.01851212,0.1330786,0.0101057105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3424015,0.0010277452,0.00273733,0.040576737,0.0059733386,0.014965554,0.002130786,0.001825565,0.0022171596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70634854,0.0008641441,0.002062047,0.03696473,0.006449315,0.014822322,0.0062736142,0.0032251978,0.00066920184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001425378,0.00072529993,0.3271325,0.011783124,0.0016672426,0.0004741108,0.08085216,0.0010194285,0.0020067536,0.0146771865,0.02443362,0.5338032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004493113,0.003795024,0.7088153,0.01425207,0.0015638538,0.0014740982,0.08451708,0.0064904434,0.0051327916,0.027921226,0.14382145,0.0017673832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069455486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012969257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95942324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016545285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021271756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81093603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231542139","doi":"10.3410/f.717968610.793468321","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.6925916288795719,"score_gpt":0.6689692607407867,"score_spread":0.023622368138785266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231542139","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003656087,0.00027979052,0.00012104508,0.00019532304,0.000029442834,0.000026528349,0.9941632,0.00019135087,0.0013373601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005403229,0.00017034067,0.0006098648,0.000073656964,0.000021303298,0.0000866934,0.9922714,0.000052961317,0.0013105428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956666,0.00080698257,0.00068893813,0.00076480414,0.0017570686,0.0003155001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851034,0.0046738633,0.00396008,0.0016669974,0.0035934593,0.0010021898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037527136,0.0012605205,0.0013027318,0.008200613,0.0005895658,0.002217202,0.0025935522,0.0014746112,0.012080475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027716294,0.00038208044,0.0013310906,0.019927938,0.00038194767,0.001276823,0.0015223055,0.001347216,0.0122529445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007753588,0.0001371124,0.028733198,0.001475026,0.0003693987,0.000044245084,0.000097368196,0.0009782772,0.00028649782,0.00095932046,0.9536973,0.012446958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012833613,0.000104036015,0.21966694,0.00075860193,0.00049509655,0.0002682381,0.00041000915,0.0042524505,0.0019117297,0.002131682,0.7685943,0.00012344572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08601346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14911243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003281526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044003846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17102563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231552299","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2014.7417042","title":"Crawling ResearchGate.net to Measure Student/Supervisor Collaboration","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; Crawling; Supervisor; Download; Computer science; Social network analysis; World Wide Web; Social network (sociolinguistics); Measure (data warehouse); Knowledge management; Data science; Social media; Management; Database","score_opus":0.6862926154229483,"score_gpt":0.6197131306743925,"score_spread":0.0665794847485558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231552299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70434016,0.0051046824,0.02370864,0.002288993,0.00038355688,0.0011112487,0.19184609,0.006004164,0.06521252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70484394,0.002639517,0.07136009,0.000232156,0.00023406342,0.0020555442,0.20472203,0.0006785075,0.01323411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947813,0.001082568,0.0005338512,0.00078899343,0.0025603937,0.00025282096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636905,0.018310696,0.005709159,0.0035171935,0.006417628,0.0023548552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004388424,0.00061099225,0.00061464676,0.025212513,0.0013509889,0.0025265564,0.0009409824,0.000954357,0.0020370337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034337685,0.00033762163,0.0003779374,0.029523833,0.000512327,0.0026510393,0.0017339019,0.00072875357,0.0013536182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063482847,0.0009070852,0.37822232,0.0059782113,0.00074921304,0.0009007372,0.010527035,0.012313455,0.0151568195,0.031101532,0.21387544,0.32963338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022526324,0.0004027645,0.4595627,0.00056892604,0.00036732553,0.0013984512,0.006085325,0.05059166,0.01755025,0.016264103,0.44669557,0.0002877082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021053689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03414108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99561155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015951806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035988737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04186231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231624074","doi":"10.1063/1.4796786","title":"University Research Funding: More than Supporting the Best to Do the Best","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Originality; Creativity; Productivity; Nothing; Public relations; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7204209821994506,"score_gpt":0.5745014316419546,"score_spread":0.14591955055749606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231624074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013696133,0.040455926,0.009884279,0.90298986,0.008135687,0.000041109484,0.00008698489,0.0002656554,0.0367709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18740596,0.11114414,0.04373728,0.5674967,0.046037793,0.0008952031,0.0004041655,0.0014540144,0.04142477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83508205,0.10170068,0.006789618,0.009793969,0.035788458,0.010845247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6955439,0.18679336,0.014190425,0.038382463,0.034393616,0.030696252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16317102,0.0015164937,0.0036184157,0.0043141306,0.008173633,0.043055914,0.0064551784,0.021625238,0.019273788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31722575,0.0010584827,0.0011824421,0.0071826703,0.03455422,0.062056616,0.016109329,0.015946673,0.008548399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012658189,0.000074981275,0.00087347045,0.0012134195,0.00013237412,0.00013424984,0.0029909734,0.00068858056,0.00022078086,0.56437254,0.28384143,0.14533061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077213655,0.000055862725,0.0003240333,0.0021869328,0.000037983336,0.00011988649,0.0017367217,0.00035900067,0.00018895169,0.48041347,0.51443243,0.00006758068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003650403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028531582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009178162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036008067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86294115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231745346","doi":"10.3917/rsi.121.0072","title":"Dérives et effets pervers de l’évaluation quantitative de la recherche : sur les mauvais usages de la bibliométrie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9500571617048811,"score_gpt":0.7054736319538845,"score_spread":0.24458352975099662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231745346","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18240075,0.042760693,0.6771012,0.016473278,0.0013566142,0.0012113744,0.0026558544,0.0020163972,0.074023835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7080489,0.007319445,0.27115333,0.0014157457,0.00079256675,0.001580128,0.0009627483,0.0008461947,0.007880981],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6169105,0.25331354,0.018392486,0.01188932,0.098077364,0.0014167385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1718276,0.7413761,0.016994117,0.027835771,0.04113294,0.0008336147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1870041,0.0023648646,0.0028551314,0.020512875,0.0020098514,0.017037163,0.0022489543,0.0033140194,0.0044913343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58156174,0.001170912,0.0028482487,0.023148084,0.006986099,0.009247065,0.00519715,0.0033787505,0.0018918052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014457682,0.0002886819,0.057936866,0.0099596875,0.004036808,0.00021182487,0.011099889,0.015551614,0.0078120744,0.09443964,0.007155751,0.7900613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070359115,0.0027629624,0.21923608,0.011213772,0.0051236283,0.0020508943,0.014767836,0.14427987,0.054419138,0.36546785,0.1787244,0.0012500606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006145092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005093706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005803165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004828308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98898405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231996947","doi":"10.1037/cap0000178","title":"“Publishing excellence in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne”: Correction to Goghari (2019).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Excellence; Publishing; Library science; Applied psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4118619439686775,"score_gpt":0.5318201794958788,"score_spread":0.1199582355272013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231996947","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000108788794,0.0045132297,0.00021799182,0.24432564,0.74623924,0.000020370653,0.0016995041,0.00034525563,0.0025300197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012560379,0.015814723,0.0027515471,0.4153176,0.41430306,0.00033115677,0.0052279043,0.0010530702,0.13264063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760202,0.0027339647,0.0031783655,0.0023193855,0.013019342,0.0027287656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86982745,0.016453017,0.006224099,0.004419031,0.09626707,0.0068092886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013197561,0.0025810944,0.0034131128,0.011989403,0.008376614,0.011038722,0.0063185664,0.014520963,0.022926526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11398593,0.0015130233,0.0021539037,0.016634865,0.007978377,0.004840859,0.0045777387,0.020940188,0.025592202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005623341,0.0000012230543,0.000042786545,0.000052085255,0.0000035053308,0.000018772951,0.000021165188,0.0000066630096,0.0000060804728,0.00038118256,0.9981529,0.0013078838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025119365,0.0000071734044,0.001928185,0.0005483883,0.000024959993,0.0001227336,0.00015523312,0.00011543695,0.00008962212,0.0010230176,0.99590933,0.00005078584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41432035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4304301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023506202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044662595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8238175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232697165","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/9sfm8","title":"Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grant funding; Political science; Principal (computer security); Public relations; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.934280920904689,"score_gpt":0.7001888630498099,"score_spread":0.23409205785487908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232697165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15834261,0.010053435,0.29778937,0.44028568,0.003540589,0.004737233,0.0007015506,0.0019003421,0.08264929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57562894,0.0068465658,0.35540584,0.027974818,0.0019689228,0.011567208,0.0007824741,0.00081108464,0.019014172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.52017075,0.32691556,0.03885324,0.019404935,0.07876758,0.015887912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36926773,0.24989694,0.07825216,0.07606023,0.18156317,0.044959765],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4638191,0.0013331205,0.0020894273,0.021311248,0.015778117,0.059943978,0.00941918,0.008802451,0.004694699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5624041,0.0017980095,0.0018102445,0.020517187,0.013910495,0.03549963,0.041113477,0.009902246,0.004093105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035432348,0.0006657483,0.05383362,0.0029321508,0.00035764268,0.0010165251,0.17352508,0.0025707271,0.0036909527,0.21980894,0.0636701,0.4775742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035046373,0.00038501265,0.026892,0.0060422025,0.00024374052,0.0010065075,0.088989444,0.004095926,0.0040323013,0.38944882,0.47806743,0.0004461693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006705276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066954736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5361809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023966879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08084393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233161158","doi":"10.3138/cpp.38.4.445","title":"Canadian Economics in Decline: Implications for Canada’s Economics Journals","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.5059169868946061,"score_gpt":0.5274507741167087,"score_spread":0.02153378722210264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233161158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052303918,0.08870403,0.0016057797,0.6027142,0.005424414,0.0002534075,0.014756146,0.0003431243,0.23389497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6315378,0.13315327,0.008099799,0.09535099,0.0051939264,0.00044562703,0.009731255,0.0005069462,0.11598036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818604,0.0015827165,0.00083283754,0.0015786607,0.009964856,0.004180484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85558665,0.020488234,0.008336804,0.002773716,0.092648506,0.020166082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014609551,0.001259957,0.0016049822,0.038926188,0.019533822,0.023917872,0.0035500575,0.0029600975,0.023108233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0633029,0.0005915284,0.0010155234,0.07580104,0.007898151,0.006960806,0.004177175,0.0033488919,0.0017179046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031965994,0.00012443546,0.077126674,0.0018695169,0.0002486891,0.00058918813,0.014821528,0.0009013856,0.0005176926,0.22590518,0.528318,0.14925805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053733183,0.00003347084,0.1345611,0.0023167818,0.00018584638,0.00013655054,0.023789322,0.00074501144,0.00032012153,0.016563812,0.8211302,0.00016394097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99405575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22306927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38006938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90112954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233559762","doi":"10.13021/g8vg6g","title":"Report from the \"What Is Open?\" Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Openness to experience; Computer science; Publishing; Scholarship; World Wide Web; Open data; Point (geometry); Data science; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.7550313351757388,"score_gpt":0.6000422360617933,"score_spread":0.15498909911394554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233559762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071330676,0.009803354,0.0061067105,0.4607162,0.1326483,0.0028801376,0.04132167,0.0011615171,0.33822903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036954876,0.009405697,0.005442074,0.11340172,0.038567565,0.007849212,0.054071695,0.0023039542,0.7320033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861415,0.0026766772,0.00057304156,0.0013054131,0.007115351,0.0021879326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562554,0.010717561,0.0018439238,0.0037655183,0.018077359,0.009340221],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020920167,0.0014201548,0.00089234515,0.004160914,0.0054683667,0.00863534,0.0028221644,0.008147497,0.13246481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04167288,0.0004739221,0.0015893944,0.0034180894,0.0017297223,0.0077360473,0.013231467,0.007098646,0.07275699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063646425,0.00003882851,0.00027604646,0.00015916562,0.000004077955,0.000029827037,0.000527959,0.000029039393,0.00020321435,0.0033636752,0.9828531,0.012451536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013543683,0.000021489848,0.0010281515,0.0002592335,0.000006191254,0.00001452978,0.0010399977,0.000033960707,0.00033795333,0.00190049,0.995331,0.000013468564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007592359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068894946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99717784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005242287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014013157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44313896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233591935","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/798/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Originality; CLARITY; Audit; Publishing; Declaration; Peer review; Relevance (law); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Engineering; Law; Business","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233591935","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003342554,0.019268662,0.078858145,0.20009097,0.4151977,0.026824526,0.028172102,0.007962553,0.22028269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046061754,0.027212782,0.19907635,0.072810315,0.12314428,0.054553818,0.04810529,0.018005464,0.41102996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8061265,0.05432269,0.03447104,0.020922663,0.077087454,0.0070696925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29008064,0.06141187,0.026017282,0.08320968,0.5191875,0.020093057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11136428,0.0028590995,0.0049333344,0.010109012,0.0065809404,0.031173844,0.009225291,0.011475757,0.17007211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44387674,0.001972421,0.0030429733,0.00964932,0.007583982,0.011355631,0.0093363235,0.017818194,0.17789643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014209058,0.000054973338,0.0002812342,0.0025647336,0.00007400555,0.00030629899,0.0012907536,0.000096018135,0.0006768491,0.012089517,0.91956514,0.06285831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004392402,0.000022959766,0.00032322574,0.002763223,0.000030479761,0.0002653468,0.0005524857,0.00011530982,0.00029799112,0.004638545,0.9909087,0.00003780584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012333121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018784943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8886357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059835995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0661264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58895767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233675618","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100169","title":"Co-authorship Networks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.7213854434291179,"score_gpt":0.5868499200491405,"score_spread":0.13453552337997743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233675618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025387825,0.0076092854,0.16143036,0.0046168235,0.0006374233,0.00011689962,0.001249753,0.0004040631,0.79854757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5478443,0.01340791,0.07548604,0.0005411952,0.0012867975,0.00038550413,0.0024512901,0.00030167864,0.3582953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.00037440413,0.000058235324,0.00025553044,0.00038471844,0.0000726098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964605,0.0021394072,0.00029167935,0.00048113373,0.00047148502,0.00015590404],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872463,0.0005348394,0.0004225232,0.005879452,0.0015311628,0.0044956836,0.00080911414,0.0012716099,0.03178025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007406848,0.00033289645,0.0003696106,0.008200098,0.001440052,0.006907236,0.0019304069,0.00086593063,0.0065543656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010689575,0.000013397594,0.0009063788,0.0001259276,0.000024609046,0.00008015675,0.0005735692,0.0022050657,0.00037206864,0.8551592,0.015470009,0.12505905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028170132,0.000006859219,0.0011166694,0.00012396874,0.000013285763,0.0003085351,0.00033155226,0.0069336127,0.0005836105,0.83212185,0.15844731,0.000009986768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066505483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011040884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99412054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011641125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006417891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10631549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234099599","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-11332","title":"Government laboratories : institutional variety, change and design space","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Public policy; Space (punctuation); Public administration; Political science; Policy analysis; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5714277359918525,"score_gpt":0.5356221098501318,"score_spread":0.03580562614172067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234099599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7200948,0.0037790313,0.021754202,0.01606378,0.00012767811,0.00036816383,0.0006085013,0.00049720495,0.23670669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883996,0.0004350314,0.0027145885,0.0004148182,0.000015304155,0.00007249133,0.00011790082,0.00003263115,0.0077975453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731459,0.008171173,0.00079401035,0.0022440613,0.0086777685,0.0069671264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97360885,0.006882144,0.0044048303,0.0032281117,0.0067454823,0.005130528],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015746597,0.00036515776,0.0004134235,0.0055138613,0.012045355,0.016471172,0.0032233498,0.0015368009,0.008245108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025700243,0.0005592966,0.00070308545,0.008048755,0.017948417,0.005741192,0.008969617,0.0014862898,0.00056622416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002746962,0.00013701449,0.14124008,0.0003158655,0.00010764385,0.0005395115,0.030538036,0.009709434,0.0022511987,0.6291303,0.008696768,0.17705934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018714296,0.00044203684,0.3345744,0.00080806797,0.00022165221,0.00067824835,0.12845223,0.0073320707,0.0034551546,0.07548221,0.44804353,0.00032317755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5595187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6735608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99448615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10256174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08183105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8861508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234159964","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v1","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Publication; Rank (graph theory); Reading (process); Metric (unit); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234159964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81288666,0.023519589,0.036911737,0.019381255,0.0031024353,0.0062392037,0.0035296073,0.0008258746,0.093603544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633933,0.002756611,0.025270067,0.001957015,0.0009169222,0.003394138,0.00067565957,0.00018373804,0.0014525598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5590372,0.23917387,0.060851604,0.008891705,0.126011,0.0060346937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1455181,0.5737005,0.119085066,0.01851212,0.1330786,0.0101057105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3424015,0.0010277452,0.00273733,0.040576737,0.0059733386,0.014965554,0.002130786,0.001825565,0.0022171596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70634854,0.0008641441,0.002062047,0.03696473,0.006449315,0.014822322,0.0062736142,0.0032251978,0.00066920184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001425378,0.00072529993,0.3271325,0.011783124,0.0016672426,0.0004741108,0.08085216,0.0010194285,0.0020067536,0.0146771865,0.02443362,0.5338032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004493113,0.003795024,0.7088153,0.01425207,0.0015638538,0.0014740982,0.08451708,0.0064904434,0.0051327916,0.027921226,0.14382145,0.0017673832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069455486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012969257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95942324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016545285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021271756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81093603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234189662","doi":"10.1002/asi.20880","title":"Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Normalization (sociology); Citation; Weighting; Computer science; Citation analysis; Factor (programming language); Field (mathematics); Citation impact; Discipline; Information retrieval; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Library science; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.32657725380462954,"score_gpt":0.5119929688617303,"score_spread":0.18541571505710075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234189662","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0788295,0.0017970836,0.9005352,0.0009752919,0.0012410192,0.00020279147,0.0004825462,0.0013159261,0.014620576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6754488,0.0014428305,0.31324437,0.00039665776,0.0015872022,0.0002964269,0.0006271624,0.0008704863,0.006086048],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306667,0.0022349046,0.00043531423,0.0010171758,0.0028746913,0.00037131069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761618,0.010318106,0.002897112,0.004360748,0.005654096,0.0006082525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010847636,0.0011563078,0.0012544284,0.008071736,0.0009961777,0.0043104393,0.0016381954,0.0012832878,0.0038704518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05251686,0.0003652822,0.0012263679,0.007934604,0.0019430816,0.006147163,0.002405392,0.0014070785,0.0012493482],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054999045,0.00036526006,0.026257433,0.00070944324,0.000472368,0.00024554745,0.0006536448,0.04014982,0.025102241,0.24029574,0.009643832,0.6555546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013420191,0.0005155123,0.03541378,0.00036460455,0.000517985,0.0007251041,0.00053679023,0.33847198,0.03423801,0.5178053,0.0707627,0.0005140522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021171565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012756536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014863025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017543664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057368517},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4234413400","doi":"10.1002/asi.20380","title":"What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Michigan; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Attribution; Computer science; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10824341675705224,"score_gpt":0.4904801966060493,"score_spread":0.38223677984899707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234413400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62102187,0.0072181867,0.0441526,0.17283738,0.0018189774,0.00012095082,0.0002595684,0.00012919748,0.15244132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960905,0.0006231932,0.0013394213,0.0006130654,0.0002962154,0.00003234544,0.000019469968,0.000012423888,0.00097334204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93969697,0.046816465,0.0025670363,0.0026526356,0.0057849665,0.0024818608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6717827,0.24472965,0.04173861,0.009568866,0.012468172,0.019712009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037716262,0.00040856507,0.0011572812,0.0046328194,0.0069413823,0.013525964,0.0015279257,0.0040166234,0.007858108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22770914,0.00026642403,0.000527444,0.00808308,0.02505574,0.015825728,0.008078448,0.0040068473,0.00084789895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058129703,0.0004609571,0.17447975,0.00045298625,0.00014777927,0.00055331603,0.039401814,0.0024930965,0.00026710887,0.66594744,0.010456799,0.10475769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013274966,0.00013726891,0.031593826,0.0004390463,0.000058673562,0.0006216202,0.022876175,0.0032861342,0.00042668567,0.91532445,0.025006698,0.00009665861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020632392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016318696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99598336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005006366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19946498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234730809","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0020","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Sociology; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Social science; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234730809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003111582,0.0057855556,0.0005816791,0.9489234,0.033535965,0.0000062534696,0.000036345897,0.000056981047,0.007962308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13740551,0.01883588,0.0039149364,0.6250223,0.14268541,0.00006654291,0.00012265568,0.0003571457,0.071589686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560475,0.0016728308,0.0003189403,0.00069598225,0.0012964263,0.0004111958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730294,0.0140021825,0.0025764543,0.0015166315,0.0055973115,0.0032780739],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012477108,0.00035743002,0.00093379855,0.0018751846,0.00429,0.018588468,0.002363955,0.008186547,0.0054821908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048562802,0.00034820635,0.00043755482,0.0025227175,0.00748409,0.011834354,0.0028645806,0.009098067,0.0018739448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003867575,0.000019381809,0.001747988,0.00012016794,0.000016159873,0.00019431603,0.0027881204,0.00010075658,0.0001383945,0.052792765,0.906732,0.03531125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011713559,0.00004221708,0.0012055481,0.0003227862,0.000019670508,0.00027356367,0.0046212683,0.00043797996,0.0002288873,0.02321307,0.969586,0.000037238005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034651405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004897965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002492646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004019194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0659861},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4235038322","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119v1","title":"The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Gold standard (test); Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6436421491681436,"score_gpt":0.6585180130622761,"score_spread":0.014875863894132535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235038322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96676254,0.0048340266,0.001358813,0.0008500899,0.000056745288,0.00024422177,0.020479154,0.00010131418,0.0053132367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98166496,0.0025781135,0.002074775,0.00035356602,0.00022602192,0.00038618315,0.011551851,0.0001257229,0.0010389594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838397,0.0031998155,0.0038263137,0.0024326758,0.005848593,0.0008529339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8105968,0.07097498,0.078401685,0.011342763,0.022903224,0.0057805353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012851025,0.00040765374,0.00085139077,0.023528958,0.0013732453,0.0043041813,0.0015562959,0.0010398795,0.0040771095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08762596,0.00060543517,0.0014910707,0.026555005,0.0017733434,0.0053178524,0.0040312046,0.0012588138,0.0021857906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000920843,0.00006437521,0.98538095,0.00045085052,0.00026990304,0.00012730122,0.0019483912,0.00005755574,0.00025011448,0.00030873262,0.0022793985,0.008770224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008902525,0.000052227475,0.9917048,0.000206828,0.00014987608,0.000415656,0.0026622831,0.00029209792,0.00021333461,0.00021914813,0.004045445,0.00002919766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080551915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011025612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010513399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235676848","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101028","title":"Scientific Collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7060668356314433,"score_gpt":0.5972501158053724,"score_spread":0.108816719826071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235676848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000867297,0.0017567312,0.0040736594,0.0024425774,0.00056888704,0.00003670404,0.00010493368,0.00006760776,0.9900816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09499008,0.008897904,0.0074198646,0.0021682081,0.0016294882,0.00031098913,0.00064515794,0.0001488363,0.8837895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737775,0.0007454005,0.0001198843,0.0004810384,0.0010212571,0.0002548003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819785,0.0004273534,0.00016221858,0.00043589692,0.0004294497,0.0003473204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020506382,0.0006183049,0.0004421972,0.0032172166,0.0025750115,0.00822364,0.0011657431,0.002159925,0.081702635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005090336,0.0002611577,0.0005870087,0.004143545,0.0031157015,0.008570769,0.006855783,0.002007947,0.03182343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008043235,0.000012672067,0.00011515716,0.000094859686,0.00000761174,0.00003770207,0.0005931971,0.0000985764,0.00016311598,0.8930454,0.045576792,0.060246807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055192736,0.000010609458,0.00018698076,0.0001560475,0.0000057828415,0.0001501606,0.00042888615,0.00012060026,0.0001549377,0.25642228,0.7423523,0.000005932236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013126107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016327696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99794936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002449983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042309365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27332252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235720082","doi":"10.37357/1068/journals/002","title":"REPA - Research and Education Promotion Association: Peer Review Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Peer review; Christian ministry; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Library science; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.8982135922640867,"score_gpt":0.7207287112971107,"score_spread":0.177484880966976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235720082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00459765,0.006339803,0.041469913,0.11840829,0.05058301,0.0508304,0.026185444,0.01774437,0.68384105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020487158,0.004951804,0.047214914,0.027746616,0.013582269,0.056495316,0.017792996,0.006972991,0.80475587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.72972167,0.094185784,0.04141816,0.016743556,0.09459683,0.023333993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24782759,0.15796761,0.03781727,0.115361236,0.3821745,0.058851797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31266505,0.003382936,0.008109445,0.014915826,0.019639257,0.056330275,0.012841906,0.03825352,0.31339985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47243845,0.005682762,0.003162288,0.025599435,0.010213237,0.028135283,0.014737433,0.021771096,0.5877888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003489943,0.0004961472,0.00070575473,0.0013676545,0.000050330404,0.00020082305,0.0007668987,0.000110532616,0.0008596347,0.0203977,0.918232,0.05646361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016280946,0.00010695497,0.0021115134,0.0011197769,0.000026688094,0.00021513713,0.00046582546,0.00043467208,0.00062713237,0.005784805,0.9888494,0.00009521957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045433072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010102186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68733495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011862419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13340923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97935176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235721262","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/726/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Publishing; Audit; Originality; Declaration; Peer review; Relevance (law); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Engineering; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235721262","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032846367,0.019077443,0.075921506,0.20288604,0.41535503,0.025801877,0.02760311,0.007894472,0.22217588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044397235,0.02708649,0.19071415,0.072513536,0.12181661,0.05125782,0.047655158,0.017882273,0.4266767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80957913,0.052066747,0.033723183,0.020433554,0.07724757,0.006949844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2862071,0.059783373,0.025462555,0.0808797,0.52766913,0.019998245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10851733,0.0028405385,0.0048524803,0.010003852,0.0065849316,0.030959439,0.009085076,0.011406267,0.17334011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44295615,0.0019596198,0.003008269,0.00949583,0.0075016897,0.011391216,0.0091806585,0.017874252,0.18414132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001313036,0.000052909178,0.00026522568,0.0023930792,0.000066918685,0.00029492195,0.0012430984,0.00008950338,0.00065468927,0.011496726,0.92300344,0.060308162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041596104,0.000022204422,0.00031619414,0.002693363,0.000028677165,0.00026297048,0.00054182264,0.00010832046,0.00029435934,0.0044288035,0.9912253,0.000036412348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001269735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019299604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89148265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060230107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065874256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235925410","doi":"10.1177/014107680609900907","title":"Open access: the evidence and the verdict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Information retrieval; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6452913179007194,"score_gpt":0.6034253860581266,"score_spread":0.041865931842592796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235925410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032796586,0.0016360913,0.00014145808,0.992044,0.0035056248,0.000003737181,0.000031193722,0.00000734693,0.002302663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0127773145,0.0015497892,0.00047011385,0.95944226,0.023017159,0.000032467582,0.0000311026,0.0000218107,0.0026579082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95810187,0.015142083,0.005469762,0.0048024636,0.013593808,0.0028900963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.679533,0.27145946,0.010607091,0.009256452,0.017632434,0.011511548],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04845981,0.0006998372,0.0028541337,0.002479487,0.006763768,0.011852891,0.0054365518,0.14073654,0.009884484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28085166,0.0013809924,0.0018646164,0.0028487758,0.025837393,0.016795598,0.0061948183,0.09782372,0.006396301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001929962,0.0000677949,0.001134122,0.00017544004,0.00009497997,0.001683325,0.00055400695,0.00009529325,0.00014287134,0.10343693,0.8714516,0.020970633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048195058,0.00008128454,0.0021029005,0.0015085711,0.0001571597,0.002720446,0.0012156313,0.00085586676,0.0004918555,0.3219629,0.6682244,0.00019691365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060635684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009679687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99456346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008184124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010414032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25628304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249676","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2020-0089","title":"Investigating academic library responses to predatory publishing in the United States, Canada and Spanish-speaking Latin America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Library science; Scholarly communication; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.29358727861521944,"score_gpt":0.43077296768260404,"score_spread":0.1371856890673846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416841,0.00270718,0.000247169,0.0062369616,0.00008917844,0.00009905952,0.00052791124,0.0000519838,0.04835644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902727,0.0021158345,0.00018415756,0.0020904534,0.000037979327,0.00005136261,0.0002329211,0.00003049848,0.004984068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242145,0.0020655163,0.00042402121,0.00048648476,0.002738231,0.0018643646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477181,0.01357542,0.010356341,0.0012242103,0.020670878,0.006454978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069064475,0.00026249047,0.00048310895,0.0062130666,0.011095403,0.009871934,0.001268394,0.001060361,0.006590465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0414629,0.0002666095,0.00027557663,0.016987516,0.00467614,0.0028711818,0.0049909996,0.0009635271,0.00054067135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034220112,0.00013125999,0.4148209,0.0012447794,0.000084581254,0.00207335,0.4816061,0.0002116894,0.0012636117,0.00580146,0.017834347,0.07458577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010306135,0.000030957868,0.17440592,0.0003952905,0.00003079597,0.00020749382,0.78135085,0.000106599546,0.00037965336,0.00033034768,0.042690307,0.000061469924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81433064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8694146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99893963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03455097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048281394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37352556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236364825","doi":"10.18034/apjee.v4i1.511","title":"Visualizing Energy and Environment Research Productivity in Australia: A Scientometric Profile","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Energy and Environment","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Industry Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Data science; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.4677374971981015,"score_gpt":0.5176235935419135,"score_spread":0.04988609634381197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236364825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97452545,0.0016068576,0.0018600454,0.0015020925,0.000013337691,0.00013873311,0.002563127,0.000096629796,0.01769381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873957,0.002066461,0.003890512,0.000104122395,0.000027159489,0.00011291971,0.002282942,0.000034618755,0.0040854826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931999,0.0017161933,0.0010059491,0.00044310643,0.0031369932,0.0004979638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718606,0.0069392505,0.006187651,0.0013916101,0.011386606,0.0022342857],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007722658,0.00021260964,0.00042146357,0.037980974,0.0015977047,0.003887367,0.00048367312,0.0004992192,0.0024044367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027122067,0.00022202355,0.00042774275,0.050651856,0.0007579864,0.0023589234,0.003422091,0.00043459385,0.00067352323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013503543,0.00010070232,0.7757208,0.0009792948,0.00014066069,0.00035746637,0.027986234,0.0010449035,0.005275199,0.0025583322,0.0046944716,0.1810069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023656874,0.00007099107,0.975064,0.000111648944,0.000031359566,0.00021129295,0.009373637,0.0011576128,0.00060163037,0.00053181336,0.012819612,0.000023957944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035897564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05990228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00249115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050513563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07137722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236943233","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0060","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Scholarly communication; Public relations; Open data; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236943233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213386,0.00030510887,0.00050079834,0.002585635,0.000030239325,0.00003179283,0.000027930982,0.00000550885,0.0043791565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998324,0.0002232701,0.0005361659,0.00026173636,0.000050014893,0.00001631616,0.000023942774,0.0000033128538,0.00056133955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680954,0.0010658714,0.000272444,0.00016887694,0.0013716877,0.00031153546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536673,0.022575432,0.014108825,0.0016234628,0.0036187822,0.004406307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060409214,0.00009979661,0.00028745996,0.0016022726,0.0012959545,0.004181571,0.0005443357,0.0012751356,0.0016132254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038948737,0.00020541075,0.00024308704,0.0020478833,0.0015743071,0.0027679328,0.0015698554,0.001206238,0.00034690864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015599218,0.00068910647,0.8995864,0.00023381942,0.00007889866,0.00037565586,0.0232273,0.00015024071,0.0023791115,0.008124446,0.0014084905,0.06359054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000712088,0.00028179935,0.9088285,0.00016513193,0.00006383377,0.000654216,0.06089679,0.0014378107,0.0014657272,0.011810219,0.014252483,0.00007232859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011061239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017740004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99581844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070795126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016575758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03194779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237345702","doi":"10.1177/0959354319829250","title":"Peer review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Peer review; Psychology; Editorial board; Function (biology); Sociology; Social psychology; Library science; Political science; Personality; Computer science; Big Five personality traits; Law","score_opus":0.6929366523509854,"score_gpt":0.6827199836591633,"score_spread":0.01021666869182214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237345702","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004557162,0.038183946,0.07771922,0.14972788,0.49233723,0.02431873,0.01319881,0.013349784,0.18660721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04150838,0.06137113,0.12044338,0.027622163,0.17294103,0.020074394,0.034349054,0.0121149365,0.5095755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87539744,0.025809119,0.02030696,0.013330335,0.060995754,0.0041603325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28135687,0.040072832,0.020329101,0.053286992,0.58937335,0.0155808665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07883387,0.0028520052,0.0063419463,0.015647769,0.006730891,0.02244936,0.007401066,0.008727355,0.204273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.356984,0.0019277215,0.0031746922,0.009542727,0.0060253204,0.009824696,0.0072413213,0.009555594,0.2805508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089791814,0.000056372668,0.00033678306,0.002741259,0.000074275085,0.00024383681,0.00042213712,0.000099666504,0.00091158395,0.002561622,0.88610923,0.10635356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054560627,0.000037948306,0.00085366884,0.0027819816,0.000043192344,0.0003379025,0.0003094533,0.00028192814,0.00050167687,0.004271895,0.9904655,0.00006028981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012124192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022175647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98435223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038749694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041049942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6833613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237798851","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/e3z4v","title":"A Breeding Pool of Ideas: Analyzing Interdisciplinary Collaborations at the Complex Systems Summer School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Santa Fe Institute","keywords":"Homophily; Preference; Discipline; Composition (language); Baseline (sea); Prestige; Behavioural sciences; Test (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.6962939317788974,"score_gpt":0.5846079667937756,"score_spread":0.11168596498512184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237798851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962638,0.00022321046,0.0010679672,0.00019927828,0.0000067450787,0.00003577169,0.00025529874,0.000014809436,0.0019331316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958264,0.0001285295,0.002395277,0.000034752928,0.000016392825,0.000090071764,0.0006482728,0.000013450233,0.00084693515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582565,0.0019657318,0.00020921815,0.00053485524,0.00088845287,0.0005761717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820078,0.0076431436,0.0034075594,0.0010394134,0.0021127048,0.0037895276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007655957,0.00022141701,0.0006134634,0.006747169,0.0025189812,0.0031103804,0.00079012004,0.0005644003,0.0028133618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02572111,0.0002641492,0.00033971915,0.008858865,0.0012277049,0.0024343275,0.004578091,0.00076663133,0.0005123118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024194179,0.00030072936,0.8853372,0.00020593636,0.0001160493,0.00029445815,0.0386805,0.0008727848,0.001481847,0.0040863263,0.0026886729,0.06569355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016961632,0.00012704192,0.95547575,0.00007813461,0.000028750861,0.00013594312,0.02990247,0.0024126675,0.00030567346,0.003997582,0.007500562,0.000018502611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005308035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010823961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013553131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019781468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040489078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238210221","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/64u3s","title":"Publication by association: the Covid-19 pandemic reveals relationships between authors and editors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Promotion (chess); Publishing; Politics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Hydroxychloroquine; Productivity; Law; Economics; Virology; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8162678095354845,"score_gpt":0.6003339535934432,"score_spread":0.2159338559420413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238210221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6851885,0.012006712,0.0101230005,0.15438938,0.007527676,0.00013445332,0.007549557,0.0008035197,0.12227724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96114707,0.002894373,0.0036642705,0.008930144,0.003947354,0.00007982144,0.0027341582,0.0003694431,0.016233321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801896,0.006625087,0.0014401169,0.0035798335,0.006410752,0.0017545678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76140046,0.11680682,0.055575605,0.028055988,0.02465158,0.013509582],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022595951,0.00033560582,0.00085486186,0.0054823104,0.0042253593,0.012930736,0.0011498531,0.003228919,0.01848923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15369822,0.0005050065,0.00037206014,0.01779221,0.004258742,0.009657348,0.0058920267,0.003647432,0.0075216964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009783527,0.00016648236,0.49941197,0.00053853984,0.0002441801,0.0016277749,0.039880242,0.00042639853,0.0022000114,0.05638715,0.23180495,0.166334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014294226,0.000170784,0.44783777,0.00046138122,0.00014060621,0.001907413,0.03783587,0.0023931852,0.0016815132,0.065796755,0.4413372,0.00029447937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004107705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058411346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002005281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028602798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11950028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238323347","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.23847.1","title":"Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8832433222443591,"score_gpt":0.6842037583971189,"score_spread":0.1990395638472402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238323347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223812,0.0118143,0.0030795997,0.003679315,0.00042476188,0.0007025498,0.04096591,0.0005592294,0.016393226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652736,0.0029496378,0.004381558,0.00041032865,0.00042135082,0.0007757777,0.022890864,0.00028272675,0.0026141007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96196127,0.0075504216,0.008566289,0.002307001,0.01765083,0.0019641484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6315363,0.12788226,0.14193831,0.013075919,0.073087506,0.012479641],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038272012,0.00077770685,0.001487166,0.039668273,0.0015578809,0.007927607,0.001581991,0.0008756663,0.0048598014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20316957,0.00035127968,0.0020915729,0.060742434,0.001635097,0.0049565504,0.0053351447,0.0010333025,0.0016440996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010138015,0.00014215759,0.895122,0.003564422,0.0017127991,0.00042609125,0.0027928203,0.0008771421,0.00044085624,0.0026706764,0.024774056,0.06646312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000776106,0.00032741038,0.9676555,0.0011829657,0.0008658035,0.0005483803,0.0031117336,0.0019293104,0.0008143293,0.0021558183,0.021237722,0.000093415765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066951024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065535456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035716272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064183706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20240414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238369703","doi":"10.5172/mra.2012.3154","title":"Triangulation in Canadian Doctoral Dissertations on Aging","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Project commissioning; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.906773239166878,"score_gpt":0.6609234335670342,"score_spread":0.24584980559984382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238369703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57959074,0.078452714,0.0074606882,0.096533634,0.00887588,0.0027117538,0.01320722,0.00018555304,0.21298185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92461574,0.018487392,0.007957772,0.0057194554,0.00083209295,0.00092363474,0.0033077274,0.00016516003,0.037990887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9001286,0.031999964,0.008088369,0.007685239,0.041102406,0.010995497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59838796,0.103178635,0.024707122,0.017983371,0.23865579,0.01708712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094202004,0.00078074867,0.002184992,0.034829795,0.035541266,0.01874713,0.005061427,0.0030721244,0.011817893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31718054,0.0009860641,0.0017285716,0.07126295,0.009696825,0.004551307,0.013760506,0.0037897218,0.0009123095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063350034,0.00015033956,0.10671091,0.003952046,0.0004485157,0.0010551112,0.51640815,0.0007224494,0.0009039984,0.08296355,0.096443884,0.1896075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105367,0.00007475951,0.26936024,0.0071350276,0.00043023922,0.00037076522,0.33481938,0.000694766,0.0010697562,0.013194513,0.3724176,0.00032762694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9492842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97639465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1635069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36533085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238376992","doi":"10.1017/s1049096515000608","title":"Members among New Andrew Carnegie Fellows","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; University of Toronto; International Council for Canadian Studies; University of Cambridge; Colorado College","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.6273068520243841,"score_gpt":0.5854620116359598,"score_spread":0.04184484038842429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238376992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015551038,0.015272499,0.0024573961,0.43903857,0.119815424,0.0005279872,0.0020673822,0.00087430386,0.4043954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012665706,0.0032131863,0.00091734796,0.012794972,0.00414331,0.00014670921,0.00037839235,0.00017196806,0.9655685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970765,0.00040851266,0.00009160661,0.00064964517,0.0009661655,0.00080743124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810656,0.00055001065,0.000371359,0.0005132783,0.0035630444,0.013936785],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004234818,0.00083658675,0.00048625076,0.001998385,0.0053829513,0.004676948,0.0012756306,0.002193641,0.19817097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007645046,0.00048313793,0.000418963,0.0009126207,0.0011537232,0.002930253,0.0052509774,0.0036204983,0.06002808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052732572,0.000040263316,0.0006065608,0.000049106016,0.0000049869973,0.00015887803,0.00024653808,0.000026534779,0.00033590148,0.0031347254,0.9672829,0.028060868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033163253,0.000009514793,0.00073010294,0.00003253893,0.0000017502226,0.00007476609,0.00042449878,0.00001818286,0.00007755072,0.00031675157,0.99830425,0.0000068210306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00840408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034620088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031591437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010614255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66294795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238935763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.375","title":"Making International Journals Truly International","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Library science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.6847718273091886,"score_gpt":0.6094118758696567,"score_spread":0.07535995143953189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238935763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008499144,0.0087376265,0.025849808,0.2519345,0.071105845,0.00034564344,0.0003221662,0.0016100431,0.63159525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32184434,0.017785024,0.052764144,0.14422722,0.08479743,0.0016570218,0.0014190408,0.003294902,0.37221092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93874454,0.020840729,0.0050955964,0.0057076192,0.0228681,0.006743497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140283,0.02791355,0.017721536,0.028142447,0.05910293,0.053091303],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052024867,0.0015210225,0.001583553,0.008065233,0.008218752,0.06584724,0.0035201067,0.010739782,0.036893576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20560507,0.0014887807,0.0010682055,0.008323407,0.014733631,0.046291582,0.0315233,0.014536002,0.034467384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053004376,0.00010055604,0.0010578859,0.00039032634,0.00005412593,0.00022324508,0.0029849317,0.0002449944,0.00082543475,0.5897602,0.31209767,0.092207715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027559594,0.000032591066,0.00064175366,0.0001964878,0.000020164069,0.00013553927,0.0017527294,0.000058784215,0.00040555614,0.0818791,0.91482145,0.00002825408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006845232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009113103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039850227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011957339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27513713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238937955","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1040593","title":"Medical research, the media and open access","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Multimedia; Information retrieval; Medicine","score_opus":0.6234387423150167,"score_gpt":0.6174097825181646,"score_spread":0.00602895979685214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238937955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013863109,0.0061570294,0.00015792914,0.97207934,0.009666503,0.000008618983,0.000030559837,0.000031082465,0.011730373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00881056,0.010015939,0.00067161256,0.8949231,0.06674674,0.000087193395,0.000057914396,0.00005631873,0.01863066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608156,0.012117973,0.003856426,0.0037602095,0.016957486,0.0024924094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8611022,0.08897049,0.007793407,0.009322595,0.013499281,0.019312076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034925755,0.00075574586,0.0027628753,0.002464194,0.0067409365,0.019180058,0.00401814,0.06452903,0.035278797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13343647,0.0009768137,0.0013374226,0.0033820197,0.029074332,0.027603745,0.010183226,0.04816891,0.015817598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004804934,0.00003412584,0.0003373468,0.0002573875,0.000025517646,0.00040810168,0.0002277358,0.00004733229,0.00009515467,0.06614403,0.8903206,0.042054556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050336963,0.00004787866,0.00071719266,0.0006946478,0.000016465448,0.00049759424,0.00042941532,0.00016380256,0.00007040869,0.050178118,0.94708955,0.000044726927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00781833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019475853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011726041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020244975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18470728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239199063","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.75","title":"British Scholarly Journals on Film Studies: Study and Evaluation of Their Internationality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.80514527235736,"score_gpt":0.6173760173108069,"score_spread":0.18776925504655306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239199063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870998,0.047661636,0.0009724099,0.004859443,0.00070220575,0.0003311449,0.0006596273,0.00006561958,0.07374995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643253,0.024723744,0.0016522992,0.00032460978,0.00059633347,0.00015251285,0.0004979183,0.0000650263,0.007662322],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94096404,0.018391116,0.0067360597,0.0015822971,0.03044079,0.0018857103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6117325,0.18383096,0.09501836,0.010047322,0.08318945,0.016181467],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026790855,0.0005175975,0.0012510236,0.04183176,0.0046528215,0.01478481,0.0011608264,0.0010892288,0.004767519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20179527,0.0004776881,0.00028393127,0.06751567,0.004698626,0.0045933644,0.006089069,0.0012519552,0.00093386084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073358446,0.00034843796,0.36235303,0.004580161,0.0003460853,0.001632143,0.17978051,0.000215371,0.0038581868,0.012780928,0.009724151,0.42364746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049406193,0.00033739477,0.7744858,0.0017799975,0.00014173206,0.0011038205,0.08832404,0.00016556414,0.0014226915,0.0019515965,0.13013908,0.00009874696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009524482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016827809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95816827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008345587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008477524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1416853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239243730","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.417","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239243730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5471813,0.1357318,0.013618288,0.15372455,0.0032844667,0.00151409,0.00076791254,0.00049705803,0.1436805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568278,0.022419509,0.0073817084,0.001806035,0.0012059723,0.00017972523,0.00023227763,0.000030585194,0.009916241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680219,0.010085205,0.0036691749,0.0028181789,0.013344911,0.0020606532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150332,0.020496204,0.018113699,0.0057242606,0.031695373,0.008937234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031907506,0.00046680516,0.00081234495,0.0058099777,0.006206678,0.010201776,0.0025604141,0.0021516124,0.0036221982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05576142,0.00030763366,0.000426023,0.014109341,0.0044308216,0.0054790513,0.003159357,0.0012447775,0.00064111815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027940588,0.00038700565,0.17237438,0.005146089,0.00024193044,0.002175537,0.026240544,0.0030457545,0.00523711,0.20856062,0.03966026,0.5366513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019583329,0.0007545637,0.5604895,0.0026737757,0.00018720023,0.0019459266,0.022258075,0.008519345,0.0052562044,0.06309197,0.3342417,0.00038588184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02559033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025936034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99419004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016834462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05118493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1687451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239809893","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672v2","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Community engagement; Public relations; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239809893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49205738,0.005862935,0.015088167,0.20860721,0.0014281211,0.0006715237,0.00039064654,0.00014081533,0.27575314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905344,0.0005898519,0.0017239912,0.004856457,0.00023607859,0.0002055067,0.000057948968,0.000015586136,0.001780216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.73468095,0.21081643,0.0074236444,0.0075638522,0.018834874,0.02068019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7187396,0.16126466,0.052385397,0.021667749,0.01864404,0.027298508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13254681,0.00043158847,0.0009055897,0.004138588,0.007314506,0.0283905,0.0015975883,0.008600821,0.0053130086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2509092,0.00059877575,0.00083245774,0.007597495,0.019562803,0.014778192,0.014286862,0.005677225,0.00082567084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006787042,0.0008305006,0.158436,0.0013452249,0.00035455884,0.0005891513,0.032013033,0.0020900236,0.0018193119,0.6986728,0.012312334,0.09085835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026017957,0.00063073233,0.116671786,0.0023966364,0.00018913164,0.00028285081,0.064235166,0.0023368108,0.0028807,0.6321569,0.1777981,0.00016101528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021237694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037020203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013683762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035598986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7009829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239859146","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34902-7","title":"Paramétrage «scientifique»","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Medicine; Statistics; Demography; Library science; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3265938285661998,"score_gpt":0.4248330964618912,"score_spread":0.09823926789569143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239859146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39926416,0.019775424,0.11824369,0.011334723,0.0039391527,0.0007084246,0.068055786,0.010146195,0.36853248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84060556,0.008682532,0.056286596,0.0010418011,0.00395035,0.0020588157,0.022863213,0.0013476205,0.063163474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685677,0.014692659,0.0015704402,0.0025934677,0.011428967,0.0011467928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503364,0.035925083,0.0031157664,0.004178819,0.00469839,0.0017455196],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009388935,0.0032387127,0.0032750973,0.014057711,0.0038739701,0.014828499,0.0014330046,0.0036704664,0.03428941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057545315,0.0010928368,0.0042470726,0.014373874,0.0027449345,0.002901655,0.0021778294,0.006796318,0.01680641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028850015,0.0010186007,0.13570514,0.0060744556,0.004059929,0.0021690123,0.004418902,0.03290217,0.022068167,0.25753194,0.07943143,0.45173526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085656723,0.00071009377,0.55035394,0.001042841,0.0007434838,0.0040180474,0.0016746215,0.012731053,0.013918493,0.037093457,0.376123,0.000734319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057795167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031768337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008312791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005359342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11491752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239948371","doi":"10.3410/f.736643922.793566195","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Elite; The Internet; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.3255912552692925,"score_gpt":0.5488515034425209,"score_spread":0.22326024817322837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239948371","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040695025,0.00026560147,0.00013804398,0.001740639,0.00030273918,0.000025008516,0.979508,0.0008334813,0.01677956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027796582,0.00062819105,0.0007320951,0.00069123623,0.0001877858,0.0000796303,0.970533,0.00058315,0.023785235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997239,0.00027920282,0.0003657894,0.0005102824,0.0012929393,0.00031274336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98508745,0.0028631734,0.0025348668,0.0023504016,0.0041445848,0.0030194782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018414512,0.00073258084,0.0008958004,0.0077610356,0.0010367824,0.007661164,0.0013567003,0.0014732506,0.3031662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027776044,0.0004260127,0.0005964974,0.024064502,0.000448676,0.0045146504,0.0025084813,0.0015273032,0.32477403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019984525,0.0000061200863,0.0009953966,0.0002239477,0.000008647645,0.000007065396,0.00002229656,0.00002059316,0.00004259447,0.0006834541,0.9909967,0.00697313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000228112,0.000003858093,0.002816676,0.00010639445,0.0000053353046,0.000013567607,0.00004506219,0.000056796114,0.00006744692,0.0006843882,0.9961701,0.0000075877283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090396935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019839613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016575828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004893672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239970099","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.61","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239970099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24605536,0.0271281,0.07974925,0.06523534,0.004033994,0.0013172198,0.00036145712,0.0022163587,0.57390285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7718662,0.020621419,0.1280112,0.0036059832,0.004664175,0.00036865167,0.0004208039,0.0011357307,0.06930589],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96212786,0.013813146,0.0021404412,0.0014654236,0.018554075,0.0018990876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8968458,0.058265664,0.012222992,0.008160462,0.013539047,0.010966011],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026381724,0.0009513643,0.0011055272,0.0073721944,0.00430232,0.0352124,0.0031666653,0.002013036,0.0101595735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.139361,0.0006073577,0.00054405973,0.012714522,0.0037466625,0.016588999,0.011183794,0.0019079736,0.006277382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015516626,0.0002625756,0.014940413,0.0012324048,0.00011530185,0.0006426079,0.012817225,0.0012983724,0.0020241055,0.055591557,0.04886238,0.8620579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018820852,0.000568981,0.055943962,0.0020432414,0.00024169378,0.0031022292,0.037766505,0.004075964,0.0051857396,0.23078157,0.6598084,0.0002934802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007793843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022109572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027699894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010141367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13952154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239988074","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2015-0190","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.7915560477371818,"score_gpt":0.6177842220609052,"score_spread":0.17377182567627658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239988074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28387776,0.003397176,0.08236644,0.0967539,0.003768112,0.00057679776,0.0011926722,0.002901821,0.5251654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86776733,0.0010212044,0.03521151,0.010676167,0.0033595462,0.0003282965,0.000583079,0.00092505873,0.080127865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94968903,0.015981868,0.003798471,0.0046371794,0.021705296,0.004188144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6488232,0.13287431,0.027483992,0.06651507,0.059963565,0.06433992],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035242558,0.0005573693,0.0011680267,0.009071469,0.005188071,0.038609106,0.0032232164,0.005905616,0.057851683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21747902,0.00076174276,0.0014349772,0.011613043,0.0050089885,0.03875621,0.022228448,0.0046445634,0.012570346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008353321,0.0013223058,0.067441985,0.0008075534,0.00029845815,0.0014114362,0.021719411,0.0014923079,0.009734143,0.25757152,0.06352242,0.5738431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050840277,0.00041069216,0.02910845,0.00047213995,0.00024172803,0.00197397,0.01801284,0.0027223427,0.0045063533,0.4929059,0.44871545,0.00042177018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026493818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072300285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99677676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044169836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19353318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240097269","doi":"10.1177/117863290800100001","title":"Open access and the Science of Perpetual Change: Developing an Integrative Perspective of Health Services Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Services Insights","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.7928972937548148,"score_gpt":0.6916984100595053,"score_spread":0.1011988836953095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240097269","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058533926,0.110629134,0.29896232,0.287093,0.0029224437,0.00046353755,0.00055407855,0.00025508952,0.24058652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860933,0.042746413,0.058356836,0.0054933894,0.0029632438,0.00070773327,0.00020417696,0.000077500015,0.003357342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9615817,0.027172746,0.0016127859,0.002262531,0.006042484,0.0013277686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82487035,0.1467028,0.0074202507,0.011430584,0.00661448,0.0029614952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053949803,0.0011972112,0.0031867067,0.027185256,0.006166598,0.027639907,0.0037529564,0.006526406,0.0044639003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08972399,0.00078484055,0.0015603995,0.028276939,0.06687479,0.054492168,0.01691056,0.006509923,0.0003706623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000968938,0.000023898136,0.00093727536,0.0002790986,0.000033249784,0.000039809434,0.0044648726,0.00046259403,0.00004173804,0.97875905,0.00080759043,0.014141142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062261765,0.000010028115,0.00057874015,0.00035730767,0.000016867349,0.00003975709,0.003581411,0.0008596886,0.00004803773,0.9844952,0.009996526,0.000010223757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004937001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052976743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99624705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010032202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019655675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28531724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240148342","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2009.10765249","title":"Mapping the Structure of Research: Business and Management as an Exemplar","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Constructive; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Index (typography); Citation index; Visualization; Process (computing); Bibliometrics; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7418286327358953,"score_gpt":0.6186366955080745,"score_spread":0.12319193722782074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240148342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63777345,0.01189393,0.2522064,0.0088860495,0.00027116586,0.0011226438,0.0024761676,0.0013732573,0.08399689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71036506,0.0021146466,0.28212544,0.00020728953,0.000089984555,0.0003557309,0.0008546035,0.00014036255,0.0037468495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948041,0.0024610974,0.00048283563,0.00041579272,0.0016404875,0.00019579279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984073,0.009012267,0.0022558402,0.0013420358,0.0026619106,0.0006549867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047895494,0.00038736718,0.0005130224,0.01923742,0.0020253148,0.0062962775,0.00046467548,0.0009866195,0.0034457438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019724032,0.00042181608,0.00046613728,0.029423708,0.0020923016,0.0033505938,0.0020646122,0.000525379,0.0006624578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041135162,0.00023492872,0.12596808,0.0032765428,0.0002659031,0.0014248203,0.037360054,0.005016573,0.020751826,0.11482992,0.010151312,0.6803087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014937304,0.0006843895,0.3818737,0.0013415666,0.00029733017,0.0035671538,0.054333653,0.0563604,0.010408162,0.26785168,0.22290799,0.00022456098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051477267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008393044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99521047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016963934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003001475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025329828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240264479","doi":"10.13021/g87k5j","title":"Impact Factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Openness to experience; Visibility; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock); Scholarship; Publishing; Public relations; Tracking (education); Political science; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer security; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Geography","score_opus":0.8111945142120909,"score_gpt":0.6407476752294909,"score_spread":0.17044683898259994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240264479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11658583,0.009718764,0.029380305,0.008495917,0.0027340346,0.007647579,0.115407705,0.0019192102,0.70811063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75336915,0.006831672,0.052245047,0.0031523334,0.0015179329,0.006923292,0.054388694,0.0009871416,0.12058463],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584012,0.0073892153,0.0051955567,0.0021924202,0.024986478,0.0018351474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88959163,0.048445575,0.011276603,0.006276608,0.03865514,0.005754446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022453986,0.0012997438,0.001649333,0.019072413,0.0017016821,0.005463828,0.0014668503,0.0013579031,0.091959074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12244362,0.0003319634,0.0031587896,0.022811547,0.001511296,0.004143689,0.002834711,0.0020420826,0.025313852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012844943,0.0010050538,0.21764721,0.005407214,0.0010754371,0.0002578244,0.004061954,0.002032622,0.0013503539,0.04945969,0.21099101,0.50542706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012099355,0.0009313953,0.23819873,0.0018303472,0.0005627407,0.000633481,0.003998349,0.0009837424,0.0010556129,0.022133188,0.7293142,0.00023712624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047807433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062757726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037809573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060755033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30763376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240327873","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.001","title":"Stakeholders, Service, and the Future of University Press Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Stakeholder; Order (exchange); Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Revenue; Sociology; Business; Entrepreneurship; Stakeholder theory; Management; Marketing; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.49361089594369123,"score_gpt":0.43763194929906707,"score_spread":0.05597894664462416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240327873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25081313,0.0072679715,0.0046155364,0.21878158,0.00048062849,0.000091983515,0.0001869164,0.000113057846,0.51764923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894185,0.001370854,0.0006762764,0.0013354775,0.0001808505,0.000025425288,0.000032382122,0.000011349387,0.0074255667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849899,0.009841133,0.00047804211,0.00039012177,0.002547719,0.0017531706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648949,0.016075943,0.004149173,0.0015466432,0.0046804706,0.008652871],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011777837,0.00016049195,0.00027629352,0.0033038117,0.005280588,0.027618226,0.0008064255,0.0034839886,0.010681193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034211103,0.00022061542,0.00024786565,0.0051781237,0.006659067,0.016562331,0.003981797,0.0020433986,0.0014106138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086464555,0.0001959182,0.026333312,0.00021267046,0.00001769446,0.00077031436,0.01955889,0.0004911949,0.0004067747,0.8350549,0.024097243,0.092774704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036423153,0.000109695306,0.024193114,0.0007267807,0.000028297725,0.0010584899,0.11456152,0.0027882322,0.0011800091,0.44976902,0.40546244,0.00008593979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022556763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030430458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068429513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009914601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062287867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240546189","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0097-x","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Macro; Data science; Citation analysis; Computer science; Scientometrics; Epistemology; Sociology; Management science; Social science; Library science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240546189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001562943,0.008898262,0.008277313,0.039281245,0.22699466,0.00068074197,0.019927785,0.0019132474,0.6924637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00500361,0.0032468818,0.002381822,0.005250013,0.02129841,0.00029547958,0.008637436,0.0008050726,0.9530812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991111,0.00012689151,0.000055698383,0.00014384658,0.00049278006,0.00006967831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928598,0.0010267388,0.00023535604,0.00066280336,0.004373312,0.00084186316],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654205,0.00086579,0.00062369794,0.004145858,0.0027239344,0.0036520357,0.0011638447,0.00090133556,0.46118814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014645085,0.00027061612,0.0005186536,0.002798966,0.00054843636,0.0023126295,0.0019780782,0.0024333051,0.3087502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019970283,0.00001344516,0.00008596213,0.000059957638,0.0000014130003,0.00002602962,0.00004851939,0.00004091029,0.00008872089,0.0041047623,0.9629893,0.032520976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035983057,0.000006419043,0.0002485507,0.000073142444,0.0000014747108,0.000021597578,0.00005722267,0.000025883995,0.0000818147,0.0022869094,0.9971898,0.0000035527128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024754733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026026058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240741669","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.2.7","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Macro; Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240741669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001562943,0.008898262,0.008277313,0.039281245,0.22699466,0.00068074197,0.019927785,0.0019132474,0.6924637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00500361,0.0032468818,0.002381822,0.005250013,0.02129841,0.00029547958,0.008637436,0.0008050726,0.9530812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991111,0.00012689151,0.000055698383,0.00014384658,0.00049278006,0.00006967831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928598,0.0010267388,0.00023535604,0.00066280336,0.004373312,0.00084186316],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654205,0.00086579,0.00062369794,0.004145858,0.0027239344,0.0036520357,0.0011638447,0.00090133556,0.46118814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014645085,0.00027061612,0.0005186536,0.002798966,0.00054843636,0.0023126295,0.0019780782,0.0024333051,0.3087502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019970283,0.00001344516,0.00008596213,0.000059957638,0.0000014130003,0.00002602962,0.00004851939,0.00004091029,0.00008872089,0.0041047623,0.9629893,0.032520976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035983057,0.000006419043,0.0002485507,0.000073142444,0.0000014747108,0.000021597578,0.00005722267,0.000025883995,0.0000818147,0.0022869094,0.9971898,0.0000035527128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008368637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024754733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026026058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240776654","doi":"10.1092/aat8-3cgl-3j94-ph4f","title":"Changing Graph Use in Corporate Annual Reports: A Time-Series Analysis*","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Time series; Series (stratigraphy); Graph; Business; Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geology","score_opus":0.5290477156813584,"score_gpt":0.5203833162126095,"score_spread":0.008664399468748973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240776654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959592,0.00024352284,0.0008752746,0.0002171836,0.000021574526,0.00001328058,0.0012252948,0.00006289527,0.0013817451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654776,0.0002175892,0.0006101451,0.000022613303,0.000038506165,0.000014298448,0.001849203,0.000031166383,0.00066869834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845576,0.000613902,0.00016763536,0.00018795568,0.0004786968,0.00009608053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349621,0.04372273,0.011273874,0.003801436,0.0053221313,0.00091772364],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025388629,0.00022966212,0.00025485113,0.0045904433,0.00026868,0.0018349059,0.000640068,0.0007828876,0.0025218439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043252554,0.00012343282,0.00049795577,0.0073049627,0.0003036527,0.0016652001,0.00042223808,0.00060918357,0.00077372324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033952293,0.00029294426,0.9333838,0.00008525668,0.0002079498,0.00011612713,0.001323242,0.0030188698,0.0012450006,0.000900926,0.0017883781,0.057297904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005556419,0.00012913402,0.98312354,0.000016818247,0.000111732836,0.00018429908,0.0009123875,0.011937707,0.0006261339,0.00038112688,0.002550113,0.000021463222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005950274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005644164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99540955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006196012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026209786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0134269595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241175141","doi":"10.14429/djlit.37.11573","title":"Metamaterials Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2007-16","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; China; Library science; Metamaterial; World class; Web of science; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Optics; Law","score_opus":0.5649173997868181,"score_gpt":0.5944565569745612,"score_spread":0.029539157187743137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241175141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124798,0.025063945,0.0019761464,0.0037948287,0.00048096367,0.00041367818,0.29723427,0.00090482424,0.057651553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6916577,0.025168767,0.0031233525,0.0004538106,0.0008736182,0.000571165,0.2687822,0.00024938324,0.009120073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894326,0.0011674835,0.0022238814,0.0008713198,0.005632548,0.000672137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959338,0.0106463,0.012530759,0.0024299247,0.01349058,0.0015644429],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007820032,0.00085086364,0.0010767529,0.085794255,0.00090711185,0.005138994,0.00085729477,0.00071660924,0.003162613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035822876,0.0002530893,0.0016807361,0.19991718,0.00070670125,0.004183356,0.0030445708,0.00051804987,0.0020921642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039056214,0.00016702502,0.649797,0.0062568034,0.0012923118,0.00077012554,0.003038554,0.0030501583,0.0012059337,0.0057075615,0.08533734,0.24298668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016014947,0.00009305892,0.9232859,0.00057903765,0.00026166535,0.0004652418,0.0026337442,0.0014326713,0.00084865844,0.0007882695,0.06954549,0.000050280916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062810895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005337413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91420573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002716667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039624567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041356742},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4241357437","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/30/8/22","title":"Chinese 'cash for papers' revealed","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Cash; Political science; Business; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.6257687221786153,"score_gpt":0.6346706546050684,"score_spread":0.008901932426453096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241357437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41753638,0.008356347,0.0018373806,0.14606221,0.009345661,0.00028978326,0.015787348,0.0007362468,0.4000487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6720876,0.0031491518,0.00091611285,0.020807017,0.0021556276,0.00016959882,0.003757313,0.000113859474,0.2968437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774843,0.00023829465,0.00014389733,0.00033756817,0.0009669913,0.00056474877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921068,0.0024178487,0.001112161,0.0008469166,0.0024227675,0.0010934889],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033633409,0.00046834326,0.00042367086,0.003783038,0.0046720114,0.003934239,0.00061316264,0.0017638651,0.03371365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010948677,0.00027656474,0.00035653566,0.008320219,0.0016309354,0.0021964763,0.0015154652,0.0016459611,0.0035479087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006087397,0.00006076391,0.0682806,0.00073657226,0.00010957372,0.002801044,0.015434775,0.00016608072,0.0035407615,0.11935137,0.6732011,0.1157087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004470475,0.00007210108,0.10068909,0.00011216159,0.00007010223,0.0004071239,0.0047542737,0.00041872036,0.002253134,0.005179985,0.8859118,0.00008664284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040190946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057214968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004960771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005608443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11278337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241764505","doi":"10.1021/jacs.0c04253","title":"Update to Our Reader, Reviewer, and Author Communities—April 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of the American Chemical Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.29128303214082407,"score_gpt":0.5270847563751653,"score_spread":0.2358017242343412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241764505","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003074383,0.008584972,0.0020030222,0.25936413,0.67864007,0.00044999173,0.0010196744,0.003575363,0.046055343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003340573,0.021523582,0.006664375,0.23616005,0.4384711,0.0013231331,0.003075394,0.0028678703,0.286574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777077,0.004784982,0.0029516877,0.0017905742,0.01077899,0.0019861297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8142984,0.0139961,0.007622225,0.0063229618,0.12529211,0.032468315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021668678,0.0020217032,0.0028662959,0.005331894,0.005238302,0.023475815,0.0060254433,0.017667439,0.20812766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13644972,0.0015196444,0.0021324656,0.0037683859,0.002328663,0.017084356,0.0101557905,0.011844957,0.25153658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008981859,0.000013054836,0.000043138007,0.00006873969,0.0000018233852,0.000034940585,0.000032858155,0.0000062562276,0.000018557816,0.00011277443,0.98603976,0.013618992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009760948,0.00001184051,0.000089020636,0.00021300126,0.000003785934,0.000119471144,0.000121988516,0.000021345179,0.0000311067,0.00028208745,0.99908185,0.000014769305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022036016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057813562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035940465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015905205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6962564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241889296","doi":"10.1002/asi.20888","title":"Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literature; Library science; Natural science; Computer science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Data science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.19550787465052466,"score_gpt":0.4623797083122703,"score_spread":0.26687183366174566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241889296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87549037,0.029895384,0.012473796,0.004271004,0.0006030417,0.0004231598,0.009213429,0.00048458725,0.06714515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837601,0.0073047113,0.003804261,0.00007687204,0.00043713822,0.00015962153,0.002974681,0.00006500272,0.0014175237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708265,0.008412606,0.0031937489,0.0011451796,0.015706291,0.00071565126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80926424,0.12842618,0.024103198,0.0057176035,0.029333597,0.0031551463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019679174,0.00045542294,0.0015183087,0.09486217,0.0017291632,0.008952726,0.0010854169,0.0008875203,0.0035922779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14894271,0.00026928858,0.0011233242,0.18011147,0.0013631248,0.0064562215,0.0033165559,0.0010446396,0.00088494737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041842807,0.0002981432,0.6383295,0.0030375822,0.001699566,0.00047115984,0.0044562276,0.0052932566,0.0009717728,0.020909013,0.018843554,0.30527171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070292495,0.00034439482,0.8793228,0.001124504,0.0014858453,0.0013756704,0.0077561,0.02243518,0.0026002496,0.017631618,0.0656499,0.00020346482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024977564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001894072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027919514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021642416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10407466},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4242436697","doi":"10.32920/14668977.v1","title":"Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Rice University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Representation (politics); Gender disparity; Principal (computer security); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.8309185971340006,"score_gpt":0.6203364727099676,"score_spread":0.210582124424033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242436697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571703,0.0020631896,0.0043832096,0.0014816581,0.0001880348,0.000080414306,0.00041041817,0.00004224608,0.034180496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948079,0.0006181778,0.0017824307,0.0003122649,0.0001356204,0.00003650076,0.00021423903,0.000019863088,0.0020729739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995161,0.0017405497,0.0003615303,0.00094662653,0.0013985197,0.0003917711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92872804,0.034676112,0.02352911,0.0050563165,0.0032281405,0.0047823144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007262836,0.00033599336,0.0005701323,0.0030444276,0.0014241359,0.004079792,0.00047965805,0.0006978938,0.014663689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033136677,0.00018405289,0.00043809027,0.002493961,0.0015316805,0.0016675234,0.0026867676,0.0004230072,0.0012041981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088662375,0.00075167377,0.7918212,0.0012319469,0.0005905655,0.0013265978,0.017263075,0.00047803426,0.010065699,0.018081855,0.0038538126,0.15364893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021547503,0.0009855909,0.88426155,0.0005817915,0.00035403966,0.0016140844,0.01690852,0.0006103373,0.0079907505,0.052690633,0.03372791,0.000059253263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005630624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078463345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006507399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009817175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04905498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242703513","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0019","title":"Writing Successful Covering Letters for Unsolicited Submissions to Academic Journals: Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.573081142464283,"score_gpt":0.56947874865817,"score_spread":0.0036023938061129357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242703513","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015981933,0.0003297442,0.00035693398,0.97050416,0.023121824,0.000069469876,0.00031037026,0.000341898,0.0033673835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006403694,0.00029283948,0.0006293661,0.9791428,0.007956016,0.0001322712,0.00012478813,0.00010978705,0.0052084215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787714,0.0033732299,0.0038179364,0.0025338752,0.008961958,0.0025415774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8161786,0.079591684,0.014818671,0.0061985147,0.07340579,0.009806656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017349884,0.0014889268,0.001221289,0.0013674169,0.006774155,0.0036354547,0.0063570584,0.048688795,0.012743041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16548295,0.0012260403,0.0020913898,0.001989154,0.0042710886,0.0040520397,0.0033678366,0.022408146,0.016947921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007333198,0.000023046254,0.00060461485,0.0000876941,0.000011204501,0.0003122576,0.00027814298,0.0000578836,0.00035440308,0.00039190272,0.9945332,0.00327238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030552023,0.00021788389,0.009155596,0.00072089746,0.0001506221,0.0013818928,0.002473828,0.0010475201,0.004802256,0.003327936,0.97611326,0.00030278176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035755124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038089197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99636453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012513812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091756046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242730467","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.440","title":"A Short Note on Short Notes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Publication; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6367200351995497,"score_gpt":0.5627808514479131,"score_spread":0.07393918375163655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242730467","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028860068,0.0110789435,0.004558488,0.14429784,0.8002896,0.00016543934,0.00090147177,0.0007070377,0.037712563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00694209,0.015488922,0.007266244,0.12690394,0.5209218,0.0006139231,0.001750653,0.001428261,0.3186842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946896,0.0011171756,0.0005853339,0.0006536844,0.002624926,0.00032939322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94684273,0.016223311,0.0021603908,0.00267111,0.029495424,0.0026071284],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005067304,0.0017220309,0.0011230021,0.002522283,0.0035667736,0.005857217,0.0024011792,0.0044806637,0.082389325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068290204,0.00058142404,0.0013987948,0.002665949,0.0021008684,0.006406237,0.003025317,0.011796734,0.10838275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019228328,0.000010997982,0.000042135256,0.00007921024,0.0000027443502,0.000057793768,0.000032900356,0.000027985458,0.00015101925,0.0038234864,0.98188627,0.01386624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063043826,0.000020089492,0.00018603582,0.00023195095,0.0000036883705,0.000091067144,0.00005996762,0.00004680766,0.00012622552,0.0050962972,0.9941129,0.000018710005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005515896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003271239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037652275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27561975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243208282","doi":"10.1002/asi.20910","title":"Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Information science; Data science; Coupling (piping); Sociology; Library science; Information retrieval; Engineering; Citation","score_opus":0.21646723872275167,"score_gpt":0.5034285396013762,"score_spread":0.2869613008786246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243208282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95617706,0.0018266821,0.011061054,0.001063032,0.000037210117,0.00005996089,0.00079823064,0.00011310904,0.028863799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955383,0.00027376477,0.0034209795,0.000016589644,0.000019073923,0.000026163816,0.00027430887,0.000013502058,0.00041721654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023014,0.0031941857,0.0012470679,0.0010263493,0.0038195488,0.00048273095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88526934,0.05970795,0.028141044,0.0052025565,0.019494068,0.002185037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009832218,0.00032527983,0.0005712188,0.04362033,0.0012943582,0.0065502585,0.00093657547,0.0006980158,0.0019610156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07795003,0.0003119388,0.0005080011,0.061071806,0.001779195,0.005039747,0.0031871353,0.00096116343,0.00027830043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014582726,0.00008616059,0.83124125,0.00025237622,0.0003595339,0.00020893413,0.017342031,0.00405176,0.0011898074,0.031967904,0.0011901128,0.1119644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021404225,0.00009170858,0.9321296,0.00017247027,0.00015979,0.00033021026,0.013765783,0.0203489,0.001955852,0.01999869,0.010954434,0.00007118967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016141169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009945115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056456923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028056963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051998377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243797338","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-24448-4_11","title":"Perseverance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.7329864325617113,"score_gpt":0.5853421986421216,"score_spread":0.1476442339195897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243797338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013138663,0.0007035668,0.004222001,0.003805783,0.0006848848,0.00002534416,0.00005340161,0.00013627116,0.9890548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060569614,0.0007543817,0.0034127447,0.0044368585,0.00056751043,0.00008959679,0.00016961574,0.0003248486,0.9296748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620026,0.000924046,0.00013290595,0.00082812074,0.0015398382,0.00037492326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599314,0.00099051,0.00021576526,0.0012147248,0.0012249971,0.00036086977],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032722575,0.0007416013,0.0005599358,0.0013392537,0.0024679045,0.0072389604,0.0018500596,0.0021654447,0.103421815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01210482,0.0002864163,0.00044350477,0.0010614262,0.0062550884,0.0070866854,0.0050771916,0.0032673965,0.048875064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028718267,0.00003462218,0.00032328453,0.000081329206,0.000008026322,0.00016362075,0.002677096,0.00009828725,0.00047085737,0.7353918,0.12157625,0.13914621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004783655,0.000012618815,0.00032782624,0.00011283533,0.00000474294,0.0002554935,0.0007749655,0.0001377966,0.00043723962,0.15228887,0.84563315,0.00000962844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017667935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002152952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019637884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027350478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3459804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243860731","doi":"10.1021/cen-09801-meetings1","title":"Pacifichem 2020 call for papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"C&EN Global Enterprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Presentation (obstetrics); Theme (computing); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.2981916699159581,"score_gpt":0.5421405324163878,"score_spread":0.24394886250042974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243860731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004911063,0.004087596,0.0013643206,0.027567228,0.094322525,0.00087786844,0.011300507,0.0036078587,0.8563809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093075796,0.0024143185,0.0008597942,0.0056789923,0.013253709,0.00037147218,0.0057800757,0.0014054823,0.96930534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735177,0.00023830603,0.00013904975,0.00033175657,0.0016570628,0.00028199295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896511,0.00071554014,0.0005404339,0.0007458759,0.0034027656,0.004944309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034092872,0.0016645883,0.0012515176,0.0043932437,0.0026671803,0.016915303,0.002057218,0.0047921916,0.8189237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013552431,0.0006931416,0.0012172416,0.0048744553,0.0005600122,0.00787873,0.00503956,0.0036603715,0.80693734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100810685,0.000013256167,0.000017396425,0.00008125864,0.0000013049323,0.000015809534,0.0000049667265,0.000009138154,0.00004596199,0.00047586634,0.98287165,0.016453423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058853293,0.0000057874972,0.00005123863,0.000029674815,6.7284236e-7,0.000011862993,0.000013541286,0.000009509204,0.000022729851,0.00032147428,0.9995253,0.0000022564118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010078034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017473758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8189237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001846154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054893997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25828326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243951141","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/px8kt","title":"The Diverse Niches of Megajournals: Specialism within Generalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological niche; Publishing; Diversity (politics); Generalist and specialist species; Discipline; Niche; Novelty; Popularity; Originality; Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7794564199695639,"score_gpt":0.6084614387705788,"score_spread":0.17099498119898515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243951141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377656,0.0057004797,0.0031132007,0.0039558173,0.00012185965,0.0000436999,0.00079138414,0.00019759487,0.048310347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444324,0.0007965197,0.0009705794,0.00031017262,0.00014516593,0.000013168295,0.00035709963,0.00006690142,0.002897022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590176,0.0011998549,0.0003133948,0.0007319305,0.0010765475,0.000776416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619753,0.011706427,0.008525595,0.0039580488,0.003548158,0.010286444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045217625,0.00019397626,0.0005357302,0.007795249,0.0021195132,0.009861917,0.00081237283,0.00082815695,0.009252902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016903609,0.00025065235,0.00040440456,0.011159063,0.0041068313,0.0070392126,0.006571779,0.0009435914,0.0011732779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013114064,0.00024798224,0.4795051,0.001373222,0.00028443008,0.0019235628,0.076755956,0.00071994995,0.008112258,0.18099014,0.014255839,0.2345201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004573401,0.00027314754,0.7626128,0.0005016591,0.00008034388,0.0018549082,0.035071697,0.000729607,0.0015851654,0.042873453,0.15429729,0.00007426287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001280737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027981438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025570442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018302769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030954063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243954041","doi":"10.1504/ijtm.2019.096511","title":"Citation impact of public and private funding on nanotechnology-related publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Public funding; Citation impact; Economics; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.3907934107378278,"score_gpt":0.5537485753717843,"score_spread":0.16295516463395654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243954041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978388,0.0043395725,0.0019422414,0.001767995,0.000106972686,0.0000208434,0.0007929202,0.000071310766,0.012570144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958539,0.00089900516,0.00026510347,0.00003442205,0.00019123628,0.00001787251,0.00031069765,0.000009086598,0.0024186452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939539,0.0026556742,0.00045216264,0.0003919188,0.0019089535,0.0006374424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8581243,0.10603905,0.021626266,0.0033564204,0.008457304,0.0023965763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008312665,0.00027088047,0.000989998,0.004112938,0.0003942312,0.0022436331,0.00049360923,0.00084285636,0.005811325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06941014,0.00011371242,0.0008076483,0.0060810633,0.00075895607,0.0015929252,0.0011876391,0.00095821056,0.0007005713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018907533,0.0009784033,0.6833608,0.0012432159,0.0015629719,0.0006169497,0.0013912355,0.04068923,0.004727569,0.04547091,0.0050381226,0.21302983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017684343,0.00119508,0.9064769,0.00028654112,0.0014725965,0.00046227605,0.0014021837,0.030332435,0.008057978,0.031292975,0.018738674,0.00010553248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021412515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021351704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99588704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017437523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001989757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04396206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244106180","doi":"10.1111/jth.14436","title":"Simplify, simplify","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Delegate; Timeline; Publishing; Editorial board; Computer science; Library science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.5788981268490309,"score_gpt":0.6023136586077634,"score_spread":0.023415531758732566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244106180","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007917787,0.006929289,0.0018346121,0.075641386,0.9008899,0.000064213826,0.00017637554,0.0005585047,0.013826525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015217286,0.0066917636,0.0021138194,0.07003154,0.83658147,0.00012686278,0.00020880843,0.0006883503,0.08203565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921721,0.0016587556,0.0010422887,0.0008115293,0.003937287,0.00037805323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693755,0.009223189,0.0016501923,0.0024511842,0.015046274,0.0022537222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006247857,0.002515034,0.0016646025,0.005943024,0.0024251842,0.010133803,0.0021719197,0.007241105,0.060767356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08514202,0.0010095426,0.001535508,0.0021305275,0.002497931,0.0048455545,0.002854815,0.010459715,0.05586983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070738183,0.000004097363,0.000013041103,0.00007563706,0.00000675387,0.000022342263,0.000012375632,0.000016287006,0.000031515276,0.00075290963,0.9909108,0.008147201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019807972,0.000007319053,0.0000679554,0.000110713416,0.000016540444,0.00007608118,0.000022388016,0.00007711459,0.000049553168,0.0024592413,0.99708396,0.000009270962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002152619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063236556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060767356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023901886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044389823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20328707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244253791","doi":"10.3138/9781442671607","title":"Browsing Science Research at the Federal Level in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.6100471565437651,"score_gpt":0.48644969113370873,"score_spread":0.12359746541005634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244253791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07650611,0.10208654,0.0013435085,0.019384228,0.00097291835,0.00010249864,0.03360609,0.0010890564,0.7649091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34613883,0.09749636,0.0068362304,0.0032674538,0.000275983,0.00007475639,0.022241019,0.000428952,0.5232403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964804,0.00011876163,0.00012699168,0.00025986225,0.0023286084,0.00068537035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184704,0.00077526807,0.00028192048,0.00018236453,0.005844228,0.0010691396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013888916,0.00047150752,0.0006399747,0.02884221,0.009723277,0.009924838,0.0016408181,0.0010313017,0.028281113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048979535,0.0005080766,0.0005383311,0.081838936,0.001878049,0.002703241,0.0016424694,0.0010323166,0.0038706206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013609642,0.00004723009,0.024178468,0.0011520177,0.00006652987,0.00073100347,0.014325781,0.0009946639,0.0013561051,0.10309347,0.50248855,0.35143015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009466081,0.000011605675,0.04740394,0.0006073367,0.000047456237,0.00014743919,0.0036078675,0.00043369475,0.0004957706,0.0019016832,0.94528806,0.000045639303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1533622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16537304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98197985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244881406","doi":"10.1002/asi.20744","title":"Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady‐state science (1900–2004)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Phenomenon; Period (music); Term (time); Scientific literature; History; Demography; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.11938041681518939,"score_gpt":0.46440421884466293,"score_spread":0.3450238020294735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244881406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846569,0.0036602493,0.0005209668,0.00135404,0.00005977977,0.000012452991,0.0022117125,0.00003871528,0.007485239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740005,0.0006571874,0.00013418781,0.000061006704,0.000065541215,0.0000064827286,0.0010139755,0.0000065076047,0.00065499934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904424,0.0001459568,0.00013654024,0.00021260745,0.00031518165,0.00014561618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969188,0.008051318,0.009077315,0.0013190442,0.010654627,0.001709689],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038569039,0.00011276049,0.0003419852,0.0047191796,0.00060189905,0.0019758418,0.00048816673,0.00063990365,0.0023925004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023867123,0.00012608516,0.00024113689,0.0065539866,0.0006276796,0.001751953,0.0010758636,0.0007298441,0.00073622743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030560954,0.00008851387,0.9465069,0.00014863796,0.0001118807,0.00019573118,0.003878681,0.0007276936,0.00059836585,0.0034671356,0.0040270886,0.039943688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029892217,0.000037758145,0.99441916,0.000024022105,0.00001801951,0.000073397874,0.0006718569,0.0003343437,0.00014452865,0.0005961048,0.003669859,0.000007919135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009743178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071780747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013625654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009845912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020397484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244994113","doi":"10.13021/g89k55","title":"The Journal Impact Factor and its discontents: steps toward responsible metrics and better research assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Scholarship; Declaration; Citation impact; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Metric (unit); Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Business; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.9026090047239823,"score_gpt":0.6611413626244598,"score_spread":0.24146764209952254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244994113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014805439,0.013145431,0.07400531,0.87021714,0.021897474,0.0010431112,0.000483319,0.0016739881,0.016053602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088534385,0.030903753,0.65818626,0.1556979,0.03087163,0.013150182,0.0020796447,0.005982849,0.014593457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.31574467,0.35965326,0.09571189,0.015831534,0.20346417,0.009594519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07198416,0.5767623,0.03651519,0.06919916,0.21781152,0.027727596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.67146903,0.004787493,0.009409606,0.048841093,0.026474081,0.124486595,0.015389579,0.030459767,0.008420284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82939994,0.0046602627,0.005439213,0.051959835,0.06585835,0.10010625,0.037538655,0.068526715,0.0091183055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000864113,0.00032237422,0.0047526155,0.0030905234,0.00018337989,0.0001347537,0.017534064,0.0007676421,0.00054918614,0.38121027,0.34349087,0.24787791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005891934,0.00017345868,0.003736011,0.009379082,0.000075544995,0.00015964759,0.013145577,0.0018980901,0.0008209478,0.3444549,0.6256066,0.00049123855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016358271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008828104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047655106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21112618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40513724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245049036","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Public relations; Community engagement; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245049036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49205738,0.005862935,0.015088167,0.20860721,0.0014281211,0.0006715237,0.00039064654,0.00014081533,0.27575314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905344,0.0005898519,0.0017239912,0.004856457,0.00023607859,0.0002055067,0.000057948968,0.000015586136,0.001780216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.73468095,0.21081643,0.0074236444,0.0075638522,0.018834874,0.02068019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7187396,0.16126466,0.052385397,0.021667749,0.01864404,0.027298508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13254681,0.00043158847,0.0009055897,0.004138588,0.007314506,0.0283905,0.0015975883,0.008600821,0.0053130086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2509092,0.00059877575,0.00083245774,0.007597495,0.019562803,0.014778192,0.014286862,0.005677225,0.00082567084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006787042,0.0008305006,0.158436,0.0013452249,0.00035455884,0.0005891513,0.032013033,0.0020900236,0.0018193119,0.6986728,0.012312334,0.09085835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026017957,0.00063073233,0.116671786,0.0023966364,0.00018913164,0.00028285081,0.064235166,0.0023368108,0.0028807,0.6321569,0.1777981,0.00016101528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021237694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037020203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013683762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035598986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7009829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245262479","doi":"10.1002/asi.21383","title":"A comparison of citer and citation‐based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Psychology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.3084545123489503,"score_gpt":0.5523056020953095,"score_spread":0.24385108974635922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245262479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632732,0.0029477996,0.00855957,0.0007658526,0.00018517916,0.0003836303,0.0047527435,0.00032116205,0.018810878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927989,0.0004223249,0.002917949,0.00006318574,0.000154333,0.0002371103,0.0021462776,0.00003943262,0.0012203961],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.964043,0.01091721,0.003593372,0.0016865904,0.019092983,0.0006667942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7572242,0.14188835,0.04814094,0.009422085,0.04017439,0.0031500075],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411054,0.0006213555,0.0020513965,0.027916122,0.00096917094,0.0043363394,0.0013015002,0.0010356698,0.003603283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816038,0.00023145216,0.0019753913,0.026124774,0.0012900616,0.005426071,0.0027752356,0.0008047179,0.0013215635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019311955,0.00075539993,0.83943826,0.001587648,0.0041280114,0.00027165082,0.0016317191,0.0033354117,0.0020133203,0.007487748,0.002883225,0.13453646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016798009,0.0024551258,0.97302544,0.00017749307,0.0008170129,0.00042490452,0.0011779722,0.008119889,0.0027939868,0.0072090933,0.0035029342,0.00012824938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091432704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013739354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97208387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020650192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010838313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23328161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245281636","doi":"10.7554/elife.47338.010","title":"Author response: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Factor (programming language); Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.8569012841416782,"score_gpt":0.6973367844270371,"score_spread":0.15956449971464115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245281636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019578936,0.001194419,0.0006161737,0.8561423,0.121354006,0.00022481495,0.0023586382,0.00027220335,0.015879521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027070066,0.0022903292,0.0017661746,0.74016446,0.086441725,0.0007770902,0.0015755739,0.00034003783,0.13957459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98055744,0.0062258267,0.0033447603,0.0013176914,0.0072236834,0.0013306569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6856705,0.18179223,0.010165174,0.0054885233,0.106822215,0.010061335],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019580385,0.0009430346,0.001359597,0.003608172,0.002633879,0.0047480133,0.0017655342,0.017708907,0.046451874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23589666,0.000630744,0.00090425636,0.0028455618,0.001704367,0.002283858,0.002093696,0.008236293,0.020546166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012113813,0.000033140637,0.0012786047,0.00019932268,0.000012954393,0.000052809053,0.00007220599,0.00003432836,0.00006306237,0.0007630129,0.9874551,0.009914285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901544,0.00017365662,0.017044744,0.0011968652,0.00008841507,0.00041819786,0.0011160118,0.0006708653,0.00084855687,0.003496299,0.97451764,0.00013855561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069824546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013105037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99639183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044863694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008453661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.155397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245410681","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119","title":"The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Open science; Bibliometrics; Scale (ratio); Gold standard (test); Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Geography; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6436421491681436,"score_gpt":0.6585180130622761,"score_spread":0.014875863894132535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245410681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96676254,0.0048340266,0.001358813,0.0008500899,0.000056745288,0.00024422177,0.020479154,0.00010131418,0.0053132367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98166496,0.0025781135,0.002074775,0.00035356602,0.00022602192,0.00038618315,0.011551851,0.0001257229,0.0010389594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838397,0.0031998155,0.0038263137,0.0024326758,0.005848593,0.0008529339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8105968,0.07097498,0.078401685,0.011342763,0.022903224,0.0057805353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012851025,0.00040765374,0.00085139077,0.023528958,0.0013732453,0.0043041813,0.0015562959,0.0010398795,0.0040771095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08762596,0.00060543517,0.0014910707,0.026555005,0.0017733434,0.0053178524,0.0040312046,0.0012588138,0.0021857906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000920843,0.00006437521,0.98538095,0.00045085052,0.00026990304,0.00012730122,0.0019483912,0.00005755574,0.00025011448,0.00030873262,0.0022793985,0.008770224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008902525,0.000052227475,0.9917048,0.000206828,0.00014987608,0.000415656,0.0026622831,0.00029209792,0.00021333461,0.00021914813,0.004045445,0.00002919766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080551915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011025612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010513399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246533251","doi":"10.29173/jchla29405","title":"Dimensions","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054764921784485665,"score_gpt":0.40143029358987925,"score_spread":0.3466653718053936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246533251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022243774,0.0019037188,0.056208357,0.0074024634,0.0013257565,0.004468644,0.22868234,0.008247667,0.6695173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17011327,0.0043722177,0.25182918,0.005253022,0.00086799276,0.012767127,0.32217386,0.006218898,0.22640444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906303,0.0017686429,0.0012569863,0.0012394307,0.0045269355,0.00057765946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750242,0.006902736,0.0017240406,0.003270447,0.011651673,0.0014268626],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067658983,0.0011127859,0.0007574344,0.006074948,0.00195657,0.008823957,0.0015035849,0.0010724406,0.13107339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045575697,0.0006261393,0.0016024313,0.008513388,0.0011322551,0.006939036,0.0042555104,0.0021870336,0.042127177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025556446,0.00016606228,0.017644294,0.0011292384,0.00010376403,0.00006634751,0.0027385387,0.00041109335,0.000505309,0.12885657,0.58842176,0.25970152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003282171,0.000030270998,0.0066362666,0.00036794366,0.00003813141,0.0001034552,0.0010789145,0.00028716406,0.00034403862,0.021579238,0.9694521,0.000049679737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014712125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015408608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99392503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040584295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083071515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247203496","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv8j6b1.28","title":"Canada’s Scientific Cooperation with Developing Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Regional science; Political science","score_opus":0.2913868173689603,"score_gpt":0.38177872773155397,"score_spread":0.09039191036259364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247203496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00669657,0.053446025,0.00087138644,0.08380125,0.0036152238,0.0001093269,0.003902456,0.00032420273,0.8472335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1059246,0.060922258,0.0046086125,0.0073858956,0.0005753142,0.00011887077,0.001746903,0.00024811015,0.81846946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637294,0.0002232,0.00011245528,0.00021161756,0.002139401,0.0009403275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499846,0.0004548091,0.00015453043,0.00023471839,0.0029673167,0.0011901093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022876519,0.0009300294,0.00062291377,0.0059300913,0.011136481,0.011501474,0.00124794,0.002223827,0.032778263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048203208,0.0005571956,0.0006437875,0.013773319,0.0031124551,0.0024708607,0.0028665385,0.0030950457,0.003568684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066525456,0.000031846685,0.0017675763,0.00040769277,0.000038248436,0.00027763878,0.0014109083,0.00044170895,0.00029647272,0.21047881,0.6851414,0.09964106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008557754,0.0000042453657,0.0021560292,0.00014779657,0.000008523512,0.000039576127,0.0004292721,0.000073624324,0.00012101209,0.002654741,0.99434537,0.000011258454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98581845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99294287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10775531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35820863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78182316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247279204","doi":"10.7287/peerj.2264v0.3/reviews/1","title":"Peer Review #1 of \"Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (v0.3)\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Library science; Operations research; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Regional science; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.8648723760652484,"score_gpt":0.691887158452412,"score_spread":0.17298521761283636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247279204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054882012,0.035481207,0.02765446,0.3452556,0.09199063,0.010962551,0.01638525,0.010433569,0.4069547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29751974,0.035770603,0.04308814,0.063620515,0.024539128,0.0038598883,0.025611185,0.0045082984,0.50148255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8702703,0.01621068,0.00922406,0.0057145273,0.09020075,0.008379625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30142158,0.043502375,0.031913243,0.021703344,0.5550543,0.04640512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07281976,0.0009405491,0.0017229157,0.007393475,0.01203281,0.018987484,0.008690936,0.0040404485,0.054483045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21445367,0.0011313214,0.0013133248,0.007788731,0.006755751,0.0062724934,0.007844227,0.0041791154,0.031433526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110571185,0.000055512115,0.009578671,0.0016648705,0.00007312464,0.00033143608,0.0008861244,0.0001282592,0.0011759264,0.0055477265,0.82324225,0.15720557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033244793,0.00006021502,0.027384663,0.00068530167,0.000030710537,0.00031675532,0.000981113,0.00042166974,0.0007320264,0.0015693909,0.9676999,0.000084981766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21524572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28028238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99130905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020020634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17653432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42798573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247380316","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u39052","title":"Watson, James Kay Graham, (born 20 April 1936), Principal Research Officer, National Research Council of Canada, 1987–2007, now Researcher Emeritus (Senior Research Officer, 1982–87)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Officer; Management; Principal (computer security); Library science; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.695203639937084,"score_gpt":0.5612403846769963,"score_spread":0.13396325526008768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247380316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033454725,0.2103621,0.0040328475,0.30678156,0.05651846,0.0001584294,0.012567735,0.0011465878,0.40508685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060494132,0.06543803,0.0016780305,0.0056769936,0.0016435959,0.00004115808,0.0019324467,0.00027109415,0.9172692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969404,0.00029073618,0.00020126687,0.0004312669,0.0019033625,0.0002329068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209267,0.0012168733,0.0003840084,0.00021612,0.005278686,0.0008115618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035213467,0.00075203733,0.00082554424,0.0051973746,0.0039657606,0.0075299456,0.00089532044,0.002164182,0.06323643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015911676,0.00063647475,0.00026794686,0.011582635,0.001831232,0.0056809383,0.0018178333,0.003337356,0.054142933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006787871,0.0000014433163,0.00020675006,0.000050971463,0.0000012459275,0.000021819285,0.00014427109,0.000009963736,0.000030871764,0.003679651,0.96874934,0.027096953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013069019,0.0000017591959,0.0005749023,0.00009968791,0.0000020203931,0.000033022963,0.00017619395,0.000010987688,0.000071319875,0.00074766076,0.99827206,0.000009039192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20152897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37181535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007960029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016177345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4007119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247603127","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.364","title":"The Joy of Counting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Publishing; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Mathematics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.46913920548307897,"score_gpt":0.5373242602162541,"score_spread":0.06818505473317515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247603127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006632475,0.04108764,0.43699703,0.36552545,0.026498249,0.00024163398,0.00057030894,0.0009127576,0.12153444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2870929,0.04047362,0.4420901,0.13664429,0.045951944,0.0023118763,0.0006287994,0.0021940935,0.04261245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84762585,0.104800954,0.006711087,0.010447663,0.028453028,0.0019614128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5847615,0.33784804,0.009912907,0.03696438,0.027083935,0.0034293425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11342497,0.0022934698,0.0034680017,0.0075752945,0.0083832275,0.020989135,0.0049322112,0.005974938,0.005841132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33575055,0.0011350217,0.0017851245,0.008014712,0.05717053,0.05395413,0.011818209,0.02050207,0.0038233101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000905317,0.000026063979,0.0012105829,0.00043273703,0.000080175436,0.000092552466,0.0032123772,0.00051246333,0.00015223508,0.8551905,0.05689304,0.082106635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002595335,0.00003510142,0.00034568613,0.00061221555,0.000024376963,0.00019812294,0.0012379065,0.0010134669,0.0003638059,0.83018744,0.16587399,0.00008185513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030042087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029596824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046584825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007793258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5998558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247804864","doi":"10.32920/14642139.v1","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Political science; Data science; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8007876750054489,"score_gpt":0.6287589678712654,"score_spread":0.1720287071341835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247804864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4271527,0.16173925,0.032454293,0.2743995,0.0038405773,0.00024815413,0.008093377,0.0009030941,0.0911691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8878042,0.057907272,0.02562225,0.016192585,0.0048841843,0.00018373951,0.0032168056,0.000716232,0.0034727557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8850791,0.038928904,0.016427072,0.009066138,0.04879053,0.0017081962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3855865,0.40873414,0.06532035,0.033227358,0.10403032,0.0031012576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09733224,0.00055274885,0.0010385381,0.032980595,0.0024379801,0.01311695,0.0025914737,0.0025618784,0.0013167973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36885732,0.0007581612,0.00078521535,0.06805094,0.009962506,0.016446533,0.004613508,0.0057997517,0.000794127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021956782,0.000068394445,0.2705388,0.0028619831,0.00027585347,0.0002759108,0.03221588,0.000578517,0.0015229478,0.1067494,0.035512254,0.54918045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022401675,0.00018575131,0.46192497,0.007874414,0.0002105371,0.0022922442,0.04347772,0.0031518873,0.003969957,0.034573786,0.44193935,0.0003769008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011507401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01276019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006457763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5147482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247834764","doi":"10.7287/peerj.4375v0.1/reviews/3","title":"Peer Review #3 of \"The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (v0.1)\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); State (computer science); Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.6140793373211468,"score_gpt":0.6506770163382228,"score_spread":0.036597679017076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247834764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014665535,0.011879024,0.018820027,0.20137446,0.3254677,0.014770071,0.06809497,0.010930671,0.33399758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057383392,0.015234398,0.030819647,0.027156975,0.07618476,0.006356213,0.0847466,0.00949695,0.692621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9452835,0.008985584,0.006650944,0.0026568237,0.03412035,0.0023027433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5923098,0.04200185,0.010736544,0.022421652,0.31366238,0.018867776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03735052,0.0010465253,0.0020178643,0.010360083,0.006348606,0.008801291,0.0039026556,0.0033132273,0.20200306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2178427,0.0007455951,0.0015934372,0.00654631,0.002609969,0.006192532,0.0069505847,0.0028240574,0.1488321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807873,0.00002754362,0.00075064966,0.0011704186,0.000023410012,0.000068652334,0.000121328965,0.000037325557,0.0004617149,0.001138576,0.95191723,0.044215105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000515624,0.00006235619,0.005672352,0.0008220474,0.000031814914,0.00015856625,0.00018560067,0.0002943542,0.00085867546,0.002223635,0.9895929,0.000046096717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007828727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017134154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20200306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031350919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029076096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67576754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248757258","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.1.1","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Chinese academy of sciences; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248757258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8320903,0.017252592,0.00665206,0.011857239,0.0004544553,0.00015473842,0.00095696986,0.00021238565,0.13036922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200284,0.0018173989,0.0006966593,0.00029705904,0.00020230023,0.00006291809,0.00013691907,0.00001632789,0.0047676084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423665,0.0015950515,0.00037879078,0.0006489038,0.0018515923,0.0012891069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97587425,0.00917558,0.004483076,0.00084255514,0.0038913658,0.0057332194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785091,0.00040793928,0.0008314106,0.012319948,0.0035123075,0.009088034,0.0013617851,0.0010740167,0.012329171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018145453,0.00028873413,0.0005873218,0.020737953,0.0061552487,0.010158154,0.0057086106,0.0014306784,0.0006496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007379841,0.00023239978,0.2673788,0.00088722125,0.00019257636,0.0006959309,0.008760228,0.0017294656,0.0022332857,0.55169535,0.010359764,0.15509693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025558998,0.00036755324,0.7571536,0.00047476054,0.0008620266,0.0004988092,0.023924246,0.008600395,0.0025998263,0.12943397,0.07564083,0.00018841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019974971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02247934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01557537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06867039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249889786","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.15256.1","title":"What is a predatory journal? A scoping review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"PsycINFO; Grey literature; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Web of science; Medicine; Information retrieval; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.9152973410968032,"score_gpt":0.7496890964298902,"score_spread":0.16560824466691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249889786","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014132519,0.9864617,0.00036789294,0.0063101724,0.0011228353,0.00097478763,0.00065323024,0.000019071265,0.0026770972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009478392,0.98347974,0.0015605402,0.0022413668,0.00059536734,0.0016198446,0.00060661277,0.000018638517,0.00039958395],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.958403,0.015490322,0.015632072,0.0019749375,0.0077322302,0.0007673897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7686051,0.16016486,0.032210395,0.0036089795,0.03201772,0.0033928484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03751493,0.0012141285,0.0046440056,0.045852754,0.0030982927,0.008942158,0.0028710437,0.004541744,0.008331885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19937679,0.0015930654,0.002872144,0.042826876,0.0033355881,0.011000667,0.0041724984,0.0021647317,0.0020013684],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001791247,0.00005649826,0.0027178363,0.8048247,0.0011931943,0.00037755002,0.0036639918,0.00012603936,0.00030252445,0.0030103526,0.027870717,0.15567741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024846871,0.00005143327,0.0026555741,0.93310827,0.0013092946,0.00023633278,0.0017533904,0.000042867763,0.00006797485,0.0007553236,0.05996839,0.000026417822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007548899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016758543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99545825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011298398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03447211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19840026},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4250022371","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.307","title":"The Ontology of the Scholarly Journal and the Place of Peer Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington State University; American Council of Learned Societies","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Argument (complex analysis); Scholarly communication; Ontology; Peer review; World Wide Web; Sociology; Protocol (science); Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5900117260462768,"score_gpt":0.5086279091273846,"score_spread":0.08138381691889218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250022371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017002963,0.020645143,0.025613677,0.7254522,0.0062533165,0.000046923025,0.000090974805,0.0000708016,0.20482406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785354,0.014175209,0.016485164,0.057746254,0.008108128,0.00016100575,0.0000659438,0.00034879142,0.024374044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88471115,0.06272862,0.0060352366,0.007874435,0.034070216,0.004580345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79550093,0.13361987,0.012268535,0.017711066,0.032130886,0.008768843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082358964,0.00041368033,0.0010680107,0.0054710023,0.012324649,0.039587326,0.0041693496,0.014848038,0.0041660364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115287244,0.0007563417,0.001134485,0.008513101,0.13603991,0.036724687,0.009326908,0.023040194,0.0009513497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015391277,0.000010075131,0.00016453807,0.00004747811,0.0000051171473,0.00003662891,0.005722133,0.00007888511,0.00005547504,0.9849843,0.0046857786,0.004194243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029025061,0.000027597562,0.0011661798,0.00033363595,0.000015165124,0.00015441705,0.00929941,0.00028612826,0.0002158401,0.7753531,0.21304505,0.00007438222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018705642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017617531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020835275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02950919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43556106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250503452","doi":"10.32920/14668977","title":"Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Rice University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gender diversity; Diversity (politics); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Representation (politics); Gender disparity; Principal (computer security); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.8309185971340006,"score_gpt":0.6203364727099676,"score_spread":0.210582124424033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250503452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571703,0.0020631896,0.0043832096,0.0014816581,0.0001880348,0.000080414306,0.00041041817,0.00004224608,0.034180496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948079,0.0006181778,0.0017824307,0.0003122649,0.0001356204,0.00003650076,0.00021423903,0.000019863088,0.0020729739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995161,0.0017405497,0.0003615303,0.00094662653,0.0013985197,0.0003917711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92872804,0.034676112,0.02352911,0.0050563165,0.0032281405,0.0047823144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007262836,0.00033599336,0.0005701323,0.0030444276,0.0014241359,0.004079792,0.00047965805,0.0006978938,0.014663689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033136677,0.00018405289,0.00043809027,0.002493961,0.0015316805,0.0016675234,0.0026867676,0.0004230072,0.0012041981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088662375,0.00075167377,0.7918212,0.0012319469,0.0005905655,0.0013265978,0.017263075,0.00047803426,0.010065699,0.018081855,0.0038538126,0.15364893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021547503,0.0009855909,0.88426155,0.0005817915,0.00035403966,0.0016140844,0.01690852,0.0006103373,0.0079907505,0.052690633,0.03372791,0.000059253263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005630624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078463345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006507399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009817175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04905498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250871096","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.14723481","title":"“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Constructive; Computer science; Key (lock); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Peer review; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.6298690099803244,"score_gpt":0.6269340447212391,"score_spread":0.0029349652590852093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250871096","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008435271,0.0054034637,0.7401934,0.034634553,0.036927722,0.11088829,0.011916798,0.029874016,0.029318128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020652788,0.0026234484,0.872188,0.006839234,0.0057304036,0.08842862,0.0034208288,0.0040693125,0.014634947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.71009034,0.1962782,0.058861416,0.007121967,0.025240086,0.0024080072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28263736,0.4002952,0.035520718,0.07655444,0.19302163,0.0119706895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27013534,0.0045159473,0.005868979,0.017569201,0.0055521964,0.01664973,0.01033214,0.011249361,0.15333126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50740457,0.005881298,0.005026453,0.0140668275,0.008776176,0.012110308,0.012039988,0.020941988,0.19475383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043915928,0.0003512306,0.00023709606,0.009823601,0.00018274247,0.000532573,0.004329398,0.0009777993,0.004789367,0.02288145,0.7223234,0.23313218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003562573,0.00021288478,0.0005119358,0.005744059,0.000056486053,0.00048002633,0.00087081594,0.0014515066,0.0014463573,0.0321702,0.9564226,0.00027682868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021287259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044902433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72986466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006841017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045521528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251320174","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.3.155","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; State (computer science); Scholarly communication; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251320174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54658455,0.11314074,0.001613211,0.035130415,0.0021863212,0.00037282353,0.06173314,0.0004407286,0.238798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85626125,0.04725152,0.0013147079,0.0021458608,0.0023868298,0.00014384682,0.03199564,0.00010659096,0.058393847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540174,0.00020725167,0.0008099611,0.00072504976,0.0024605268,0.00039544585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96454895,0.0064541386,0.012183671,0.0010983561,0.013123406,0.0025915669],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042544957,0.00045898464,0.00034610313,0.013484987,0.0015911238,0.009701309,0.0013484097,0.0021048146,0.0085065635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03481938,0.00045067674,0.00028563966,0.028392432,0.0023615945,0.008902502,0.0022029162,0.001802123,0.004387651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002434319,0.0005014935,0.31936216,0.0035672288,0.00017931328,0.00071423815,0.014087044,0.0015054853,0.002748178,0.04366328,0.09557275,0.51566446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383909,0.00010450206,0.61398816,0.000923867,0.00006157589,0.0003770362,0.002587401,0.000384466,0.0018872579,0.0016964957,0.37790826,0.00004721062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06050641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08023769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015007937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072878907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12030846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251351146","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-51824/v2","title":"Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iran University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Social network (sociolinguistics); Data visualization; Network analysis; World Wide Web; Data mining; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.8665983623874701,"score_gpt":0.7567904815591467,"score_spread":0.10980788082832338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251351146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968677,0.019636542,0.117088504,0.005063427,0.00061164866,0.0010420099,0.10053808,0.00863588,0.050516106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8895186,0.004348305,0.08591952,0.00010606427,0.00018145292,0.0006897539,0.015889952,0.0002029194,0.003143556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881977,0.00049680757,0.00018395473,0.00016097186,0.00027655644,0.00006186076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906591,0.0067800144,0.0012817958,0.00020254939,0.0009150767,0.00016136975],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020642213,0.0005626249,0.00041010682,0.027668212,0.0005323094,0.0021132475,0.00040765994,0.00039930939,0.008924836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010933353,0.00014548794,0.00065982336,0.0192672,0.00025723688,0.0015825273,0.0013051628,0.00024741044,0.0007408441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087546214,0.00015790293,0.1654787,0.016773792,0.0012460744,0.0013108978,0.015514119,0.021405606,0.011202368,0.038513567,0.049493913,0.6780275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002164808,0.00044602688,0.26027393,0.0061229803,0.0016931855,0.0018863685,0.022930397,0.22261603,0.013312238,0.091764264,0.3784005,0.00033756194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003488145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003677223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97233176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005938253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011507192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029856563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251534506","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.73","title":"Scholarly Journal Publication: Conflicting Agendas for Scholars, Publishers, and Institutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Scientific communication; Public relations; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6062381390631345,"score_gpt":0.546711326355557,"score_spread":0.05952681270757754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251534506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020244373,0.024191609,0.008744301,0.8950827,0.0047215377,0.00009450367,0.00004415705,0.000078078156,0.046798628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74996996,0.043758944,0.02730783,0.13791911,0.021190893,0.00063645985,0.00015822687,0.00038489726,0.018673684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.71580845,0.16406849,0.023711473,0.009724781,0.07406313,0.012623717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59466183,0.23807111,0.027029114,0.013289355,0.06951077,0.057437822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21303877,0.0009698019,0.0029754895,0.010438484,0.03767958,0.10495115,0.006644697,0.024553819,0.00402265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.227712,0.0023734334,0.0013365479,0.01622353,0.06073969,0.05270214,0.035209753,0.028378913,0.0027476312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028286368,0.00021171535,0.0068262722,0.0017033552,0.0001636796,0.0005341638,0.09951378,0.00040129048,0.00091118703,0.73578745,0.047004446,0.10665977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020841861,0.00016468443,0.004828581,0.0024654523,0.00012645907,0.0005530613,0.1442493,0.0006887752,0.0005922675,0.5194079,0.3263557,0.00035943708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025503885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004096317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0216908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045797583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251658263","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.294","title":"Publication Diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Institution; Peer review; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7229583708939429,"score_gpt":0.5249491752440847,"score_spread":0.1980091956498582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251658263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15319566,0.05724964,0.020810165,0.018425895,0.0105148,0.0010685024,0.026446471,0.0019994148,0.7102895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78069824,0.025088932,0.018680453,0.0066414196,0.012622747,0.001520136,0.022664795,0.0014625385,0.13062069],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95510525,0.009681259,0.005995432,0.0068258154,0.019906139,0.0024861963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8649732,0.04936319,0.014351512,0.02779646,0.030513706,0.013001933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025446936,0.00062606856,0.001413266,0.02115195,0.003473451,0.016001351,0.0023371575,0.0014042304,0.050604023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10653742,0.00051663065,0.0011713615,0.024472348,0.0016380028,0.00826852,0.010145978,0.0018828937,0.017210752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008707832,0.0002467262,0.076282546,0.0033696396,0.0008332547,0.001048923,0.015413241,0.00092377176,0.0034713221,0.070524,0.10993398,0.7170817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009523343,0.00019114932,0.052120242,0.0016101107,0.00023411977,0.0031210016,0.004853168,0.00045188837,0.0013795512,0.04978275,0.8860317,0.00012915161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060055475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081454206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97884804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017024485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036973485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16928732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252049718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.297","title":"Book Reviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"LYN; History; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.7930948307567358,"score_gpt":0.5851686614161555,"score_spread":0.20792616934058028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252049718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003305765,0.46229255,0.001321103,0.03512642,0.08913671,0.00012612311,0.0026556554,0.00072278787,0.40828803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017880284,0.22213356,0.0013191339,0.02133604,0.029422015,0.0001032093,0.0029781023,0.00035733535,0.7205625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870694,0.000115639625,0.00007465052,0.00019471275,0.00083069515,0.000077431505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629503,0.0005646273,0.00022079202,0.00019700808,0.0022756099,0.00044692203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096536,0.0008693169,0.0011534359,0.0038926809,0.0007885713,0.0041343295,0.0017436725,0.002145442,0.3246433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052846638,0.00039884393,0.0005960543,0.0045583136,0.000586431,0.0026081114,0.0012740102,0.0025749174,0.35346177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006279154,0.000008297428,0.00002507856,0.00028261667,0.0000028443067,0.000021626389,0.000013004854,0.000022501874,0.000076956225,0.00095981086,0.9371046,0.061476387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020949658,0.0000035340229,0.000051165585,0.00021620734,0.000001945156,0.000060208502,0.000010172226,0.000005190473,0.000015269941,0.00030311095,0.9993291,0.0000021427306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002785397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006414252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3246433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013428183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026882896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96331435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252473923","doi":"10.1002/asi.21240","title":"An index to measure a scientist's specific impact","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.20108260231108796,"score_gpt":0.5199338026873302,"score_spread":0.31885120037624226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252473923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.546732,0.015568765,0.20216487,0.004495431,0.0027233022,0.0012125089,0.03516728,0.0024636122,0.18947227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217505,0.0032209777,0.054060504,0.0002992789,0.000998923,0.00049881265,0.010078625,0.00012429272,0.008968107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553704,0.00091860123,0.00052762276,0.00029876403,0.0025803023,0.0001376893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97841585,0.0085195135,0.003673204,0.0012925967,0.00700373,0.0010950365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051713753,0.0005422563,0.0008321714,0.01720327,0.00049860595,0.0022539727,0.0007765046,0.0006393413,0.008884379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02551809,0.00014651565,0.00073507114,0.017125932,0.0006768391,0.002413162,0.0016328192,0.0007659748,0.0020400556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006545729,0.00043590987,0.35724866,0.0016988104,0.0014231585,0.00038272733,0.0006953627,0.018564794,0.009921998,0.04912939,0.06771633,0.4921284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019867532,0.0014428039,0.64759564,0.0006402929,0.00086405704,0.0018512838,0.0012478225,0.077704266,0.01873109,0.08571572,0.16367356,0.00033479193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008258015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093494926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99482864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011526676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014057899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0297212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252522424","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100060","title":"Bibliometrics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8072790651955161,"score_gpt":0.6123744514756205,"score_spread":0.19490461371989554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252522424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001148762,0.023491578,0.023907635,0.008803265,0.003867529,0.00019380866,0.0050068498,0.002130051,0.9314504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044524275,0.06190435,0.04512995,0.004066013,0.010005826,0.000677579,0.013631166,0.0016098733,0.8184509],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906729,0.0018938793,0.00072422816,0.0009841019,0.00542523,0.0002997144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932846,0.00207288,0.0006049189,0.0011659468,0.0025846218,0.00028706243],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050294376,0.001314073,0.0015605147,0.028127583,0.002129443,0.011354914,0.0017822438,0.001863635,0.084948525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02058793,0.0006109235,0.00086092943,0.041248985,0.0022416958,0.009127673,0.0037526302,0.0019780293,0.07687555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116636065,0.00002952225,0.00054530276,0.00077885884,0.00003787162,0.00003380501,0.00026062978,0.00026681068,0.0002345564,0.21296167,0.32567126,0.45916805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027815388,0.000006646887,0.0009406865,0.000332953,0.000011554364,0.00009971286,0.00013242805,0.00027090035,0.00025495447,0.069030434,0.92890525,0.0000117171285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029114916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032398384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035783842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051989555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28418112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252556685","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100010970","title":"The Sciaticons","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Medicine; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.3228406279291064,"score_gpt":0.46981018968656596,"score_spread":0.14696956175745957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252556685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050062828,0.017785983,0.0018893019,0.037425227,0.011254458,0.00017214107,0.009487876,0.00049067335,0.8714315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10899608,0.016406037,0.0014787009,0.006161586,0.001970839,0.00014776472,0.0055679046,0.0001882979,0.8590828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990471,0.00014272482,0.00006181761,0.0001503519,0.00036753705,0.00023042693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984388,0.00015970973,0.00012110292,0.00011225757,0.00056296797,0.0006052531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087210076,0.00061493827,0.00046011878,0.0032177914,0.0027538328,0.004269337,0.0005920491,0.0014301384,0.2561966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00482408,0.00021251298,0.0005563192,0.0040389653,0.001029752,0.0015943075,0.002350107,0.001466309,0.09666559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037398905,0.00012698818,0.015188466,0.00062046805,0.000033998465,0.0014301179,0.0020966954,0.00010135683,0.0011294406,0.041828882,0.5577762,0.37929344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020980671,0.00008611907,0.018759958,0.0004834428,0.000017473176,0.0010227025,0.0017070029,0.00004466082,0.00023750025,0.003162828,0.9744409,0.00001631656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011186521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018811313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2561966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001814229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035883423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85706294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252790236","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09071","title":"Group actions on trees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Humanities; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.7098790956922927,"score_gpt":0.6478241393564337,"score_spread":0.062054956335859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252790236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22929522,0.0026115356,0.52051383,0.006888168,0.0010349732,0.00026487568,0.0009825589,0.0012193638,0.23718944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7246871,0.0022136997,0.15072626,0.00086130016,0.00058367423,0.00030265,0.0015873765,0.00052691466,0.11851108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998589,0.00045681832,0.00008243485,0.0002728669,0.00034844002,0.00025050135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442035,0.002763663,0.0005439967,0.00083466695,0.00062136684,0.0008158659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013097847,0.00038217165,0.0006842998,0.002810792,0.0024703988,0.0029633641,0.00080132886,0.0011255752,0.016766015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068865125,0.00033403616,0.001004159,0.0022896915,0.0019173523,0.005590285,0.0030669007,0.0017381103,0.002546001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032599884,0.000021475344,0.00029836342,0.000036817586,0.000011238254,0.000060130435,0.0004949236,0.0016568317,0.00068078714,0.9754952,0.0038095468,0.017402008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001970658,0.000018984754,0.00022613355,0.000025698231,0.000011581543,0.000052965566,0.00017965947,0.008524084,0.0003770767,0.9701845,0.020371526,0.00000810721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002061211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002691229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016766015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013763295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008165789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05608791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253269937","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0186","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6562424014825697,"score_gpt":0.548536180641167,"score_spread":0.10770622084140269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253269937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2960298,0.0038281095,0.09064052,0.11629623,0.0043879743,0.00055864186,0.0012493585,0.0033455347,0.4836638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8777074,0.0010276161,0.034412608,0.010593453,0.0041932235,0.00030694183,0.00059632084,0.000987174,0.07017518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.949279,0.017488757,0.0037923364,0.004595956,0.02083797,0.004005975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62462455,0.15157597,0.029872393,0.073513724,0.055252284,0.06516119],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036802776,0.00056601455,0.001270755,0.008953605,0.0044076457,0.03797302,0.0033297401,0.006210494,0.059486672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2311939,0.00078530627,0.0014421722,0.011065067,0.00489175,0.040276162,0.022496294,0.00469705,0.013795573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009446155,0.0015611744,0.063305706,0.00082977506,0.00032647155,0.0013310687,0.017472487,0.0016978143,0.008966238,0.24315412,0.06642531,0.59398514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005840774,0.00047776368,0.028400484,0.00046669407,0.00024954308,0.0019203805,0.014302687,0.0033785936,0.004534997,0.5538741,0.3913966,0.000414083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015613128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004046002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99667025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035211593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010455294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19900274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253529254","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2277553","title":"Scholarly Influence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.2660069962982836,"score_gpt":0.5094707021457291,"score_spread":0.24346370584744548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253529254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016083745,0.0012648499,0.0014336949,0.0026660874,0.00029029386,0.000038517308,0.00037575522,0.000121629506,0.9777254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7341771,0.0032663215,0.0016453287,0.0017299673,0.002239814,0.00014904569,0.0010783528,0.00019305613,0.25552097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944634,0.0008546487,0.000199032,0.0008133383,0.0031806575,0.00048889057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98669064,0.004110134,0.001472041,0.0017378518,0.0039240518,0.0020653221],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520839,0.00050566136,0.00062673335,0.009463405,0.0023177224,0.008667607,0.0008831906,0.0011965614,0.08677512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021681124,0.00022169291,0.00061289535,0.0075526824,0.0019652515,0.004040869,0.0030589506,0.0011883152,0.016399233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091814865,0.0002000245,0.03184363,0.00038992136,0.00019744353,0.00025219165,0.0050392873,0.0007921502,0.0012374942,0.60646826,0.07670826,0.27677953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004168714,0.00010966677,0.051388092,0.00026689604,0.00021629037,0.0004295638,0.0037129344,0.0011697486,0.001771749,0.16162583,0.7792293,0.000038214195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024178629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032226008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023858265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021727486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29029173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253695319","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.003","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable? A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Publish or perish; Publication; Field (mathematics); Production (economics); Sociology; Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4652991864906006,"score_gpt":0.4595776696386118,"score_spread":0.005721516851988795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253695319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2092233,0.09656515,0.066884734,0.4850914,0.01256627,0.00034286443,0.0010773436,0.0006926435,0.1275563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90593505,0.037767813,0.016185306,0.010515415,0.018198123,0.00030700196,0.0005239695,0.00037067122,0.010196653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90736043,0.056808304,0.006313131,0.0073614493,0.019573998,0.002582669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49145925,0.38145867,0.046747096,0.033539467,0.028305955,0.018489568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08620584,0.0006390952,0.0026749377,0.009711745,0.00526629,0.0350358,0.0018072822,0.006309235,0.008840417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3659499,0.0008049618,0.0010305032,0.026052015,0.01530777,0.033166725,0.005895069,0.0046715126,0.0035072498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060944795,0.00039768047,0.087732255,0.003880981,0.00067965913,0.0030982068,0.026733078,0.0024092393,0.0016519381,0.33663797,0.062313266,0.47385642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017602764,0.00047465452,0.055451024,0.0038524293,0.00029759546,0.0030440679,0.019388853,0.0028140205,0.0015143557,0.68416816,0.22860232,0.00021651274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006312645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004922809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99028826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027890974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005955387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4559055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253770440","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scx025","title":"The perceived impact of four funding streams on academic research production in Nordic countries: the perspectives of system actors†","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Knowledge production; Business; STREAMS; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.6639325129419804,"score_gpt":0.6403203082306742,"score_spread":0.023612204711306206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253770440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97134,0.00087594916,0.00032432724,0.0030841057,0.000037494872,0.000034629298,0.00024520946,0.000009706041,0.024048528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913055,0.00023947579,0.0001243063,0.00005878045,0.000011075053,0.000012089565,0.00006239359,0.0000023059633,0.00035899656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98227745,0.007806682,0.0015659315,0.000697366,0.0035685224,0.0040840823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9194582,0.036711007,0.015290163,0.0012549398,0.014175912,0.0131096635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022728972,0.00040646148,0.0005725395,0.008861629,0.0029504562,0.024059223,0.00075762713,0.0022372229,0.0030016934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047196377,0.0003799633,0.0005186111,0.007710781,0.004641841,0.0041761715,0.007945504,0.0014636848,0.00028897924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021135167,0.00032230443,0.803334,0.00087571715,0.00045418652,0.0016124776,0.0322979,0.007784557,0.0021971562,0.08696969,0.0034121668,0.058626216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002782607,0.00057037483,0.859194,0.0011580051,0.00041498736,0.0003786435,0.091289744,0.0035726381,0.0023295814,0.01681725,0.023856102,0.00014056344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0188228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015180719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012809788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01576301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120203674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253915651","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-51824/v1","title":"Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iran University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data mining; Social media","score_opus":0.8938435438003359,"score_gpt":0.7600975732063785,"score_spread":0.13374597059395743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253915651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6748391,0.0189065,0.15964329,0.005245489,0.0006236233,0.0012096993,0.07270153,0.00918682,0.057644002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89343387,0.0034881555,0.08821113,0.00009941588,0.00017950819,0.0007042456,0.0107441675,0.00020366236,0.002935815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869895,0.00062052946,0.00017838638,0.00016449906,0.00027411032,0.000063589614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99131525,0.0062454655,0.0011892882,0.00019955891,0.000887743,0.00016266303],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022148928,0.00054018636,0.0003804276,0.025337309,0.0004991997,0.0024015503,0.00040007068,0.0004134631,0.009205381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011588522,0.00015206709,0.0006396869,0.01646098,0.0002480872,0.0016513546,0.001263528,0.0002718258,0.00074658653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009724951,0.00017231445,0.14671408,0.015041074,0.0013712981,0.0011443036,0.014429179,0.025928482,0.011787477,0.04836716,0.042407148,0.691665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002473524,0.00047110065,0.2336874,0.005296512,0.0015966336,0.0017073505,0.022515167,0.2563724,0.012917568,0.11228902,0.35256416,0.00033532816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030353407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029050135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97466266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005948291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010596163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030795038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254272619","doi":"10.1002/asi.21313","title":"Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Granularity; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.15404366209852383,"score_gpt":0.5017164090871692,"score_spread":0.34767274698864536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254272619","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020880926,0.0013777235,0.962751,0.00075485645,0.00023415145,0.00044844075,0.00059249724,0.001565256,0.011395162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36147675,0.00089905394,0.63313544,0.00022585258,0.00038903742,0.0009896245,0.00071133196,0.00057215296,0.0016007848],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696686,0.018040426,0.0018226396,0.0032680947,0.0066217147,0.0005785135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83790493,0.10798368,0.010181427,0.01973086,0.023174787,0.0010243735],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018635655,0.0015841457,0.0017907677,0.016367972,0.0019648727,0.006653553,0.0020968474,0.0016116373,0.006923475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13425943,0.00088221714,0.001845064,0.020082071,0.0032367895,0.0064502293,0.005728527,0.0016026527,0.0014221307],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005375875,0.00025268123,0.035930842,0.002919324,0.00085764675,0.0006099065,0.007823505,0.019469459,0.008077973,0.20281574,0.00844444,0.71226096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014592732,0.00037663782,0.03636712,0.0016364928,0.0008512795,0.0011645147,0.006341025,0.4688025,0.023942854,0.3363065,0.123494886,0.00057013275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046216166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004322668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.983632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021596055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029252544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09855598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254298080","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/835/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Presentation (obstetrics); CLARITY; Library science; Declaration; Audit; Originality; Relevance (law); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254298080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002997908,0.025782863,0.07373741,0.2074809,0.37181026,0.020560635,0.023402894,0.007509422,0.2667177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045806862,0.033922203,0.17031418,0.07840955,0.1130651,0.037659172,0.03933802,0.015970245,0.4655147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8301908,0.048868526,0.026524778,0.019045563,0.06924735,0.006123018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4103886,0.05876623,0.024588212,0.0755698,0.41165927,0.019027924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0897256,0.0027796598,0.0042209737,0.008300625,0.006460168,0.030702256,0.009375024,0.011403477,0.17374173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3869437,0.0017996167,0.002785177,0.007314741,0.007809934,0.012155744,0.009689085,0.017486095,0.18483518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011513164,0.00005332721,0.00023821706,0.0024891251,0.00006247403,0.00028781663,0.0012429862,0.000092632705,0.00057718146,0.014696577,0.91271067,0.06743389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029521172,0.000021290676,0.00022646599,0.002446514,0.000023210005,0.00026496485,0.00048476012,0.000082188264,0.00024469444,0.00444341,0.99170333,0.00002971871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012804997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018474234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8262583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055143083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063131474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58122396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254696421","doi":"10.1002/asi.20285","title":"The diffusion of theories: A functional approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Citation; Context (archaeology); Diffusion; Citation analysis; Diffusion theory; Diffusion of innovations; Sociology; Innovation diffusion; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1571127675202829,"score_gpt":0.4602075098049632,"score_spread":0.30309474228468036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254696421","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22414699,0.000827682,0.59944403,0.007942486,0.00011085611,0.00036211996,0.0002680957,0.00023319562,0.16666463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90505993,0.00025324634,0.0908027,0.00014691074,0.00003203827,0.00031996216,0.00011423573,0.000058370937,0.0032125274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877856,0.008712899,0.0004296466,0.0008588078,0.0016637419,0.0005492799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604199,0.030868502,0.0013771442,0.002639432,0.004009429,0.0006856038],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019839332,0.000765857,0.0007354183,0.014663034,0.0045832526,0.009022082,0.0030083032,0.0035232913,0.0069868197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04584525,0.000622197,0.0014523199,0.0069835884,0.013575163,0.021793162,0.005468992,0.0023693296,0.00047886797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002784201,0.00005340079,0.0023691205,0.00008764124,0.000016683083,0.00014114335,0.0075559914,0.0027010792,0.00034000157,0.96544135,0.00030057272,0.020965148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144567,0.00010033405,0.00198641,0.00022676212,0.00004428329,0.00048023395,0.012657797,0.06932621,0.001045644,0.89265364,0.021409009,0.000038185834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005260867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026785147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98533696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009905899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004424436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10492164},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4254700503","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2015-0073","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.8505362065905454,"score_gpt":0.6242516246210477,"score_spread":0.22628458196949774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254700503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35051942,0.0029726734,0.081403695,0.09536651,0.0033369,0.0004804146,0.0009257695,0.002666159,0.46232852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965268,0.0007752981,0.029226197,0.008607472,0.0028349007,0.0002411769,0.00042812066,0.00071588665,0.060644038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599727,0.013237421,0.0028575005,0.0039047345,0.016363192,0.003664454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6990347,0.11630972,0.024765598,0.055150986,0.043279465,0.061459552],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030041808,0.00052691007,0.0010983548,0.0073309946,0.0042962534,0.034844313,0.0031038783,0.005697908,0.05632263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18482955,0.0006925017,0.0014276827,0.008859209,0.0044465363,0.036238663,0.021464957,0.0046873917,0.011695131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009574048,0.0017299352,0.072588466,0.0007575393,0.00032569925,0.0014613403,0.020561563,0.0017782451,0.010754957,0.2682386,0.05490128,0.56594497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058130966,0.0005177385,0.030858112,0.00041429666,0.00024880865,0.0019789375,0.016949674,0.0032100442,0.0047330773,0.5716033,0.36850035,0.00040434883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015651502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042240173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99689615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033639194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009424962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18841797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254735790","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672v1","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Public relations; Community engagement; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254735790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49205738,0.005862935,0.015088167,0.20860721,0.0014281211,0.0006715237,0.00039064654,0.00014081533,0.27575314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905344,0.0005898519,0.0017239912,0.004856457,0.00023607859,0.0002055067,0.000057948968,0.000015586136,0.001780216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.73468095,0.21081643,0.0074236444,0.0075638522,0.018834874,0.02068019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7187396,0.16126466,0.052385397,0.021667749,0.01864404,0.027298508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13254681,0.00043158847,0.0009055897,0.004138588,0.007314506,0.0283905,0.0015975883,0.008600821,0.0053130086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2509092,0.00059877575,0.00083245774,0.007597495,0.019562803,0.014778192,0.014286862,0.005677225,0.00082567084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006787042,0.0008305006,0.158436,0.0013452249,0.00035455884,0.0005891513,0.032013033,0.0020900236,0.0018193119,0.6986728,0.012312334,0.09085835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026017957,0.00063073233,0.116671786,0.0023966364,0.00018913164,0.00028285081,0.064235166,0.0023368108,0.0028807,0.6321569,0.1777981,0.00016101528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021237694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037020203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013683762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035598986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7009829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255224140","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2004.9525886","title":"PhD Theses at the Margin: Examiner Comment on Re-examined Theses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.7929476375208562,"score_gpt":0.6496473897528601,"score_spread":0.1433002477679961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255224140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026099412,0.002328145,0.00080011296,0.50797665,0.29716665,0.0008264786,0.0036509964,0.0020107492,0.18263029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020800957,0.0021021143,0.00057890906,0.19335711,0.07205265,0.00072585634,0.0016445966,0.001371107,0.7073667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888855,0.00159502,0.0011101951,0.0010020379,0.0058193565,0.0015878609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94748396,0.011768787,0.0038528375,0.0042428887,0.02443072,0.008220859],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012171305,0.0009237278,0.00096062006,0.0022773405,0.006439991,0.0061835563,0.002833113,0.014156593,0.28345206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10068007,0.00043818823,0.001525808,0.0020494568,0.0018810664,0.0028560779,0.006029657,0.009203863,0.17718552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014370834,0.000008085399,0.00006387601,0.000033768192,0.000001037253,0.000121355326,0.00011220387,0.000004609075,0.000044578566,0.00032270595,0.99757856,0.0016948848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014720193,0.000019346488,0.0006655,0.00011390488,0.0000022586873,0.00007390757,0.0005532149,0.000014919342,0.0001374241,0.00026958523,0.9981212,0.000014062284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077138823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011219031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041530654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066558477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9482416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255320421","doi":"10.32920/14642139","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Political science; Data science; Computer science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.8007876750054489,"score_gpt":0.6287589678712654,"score_spread":0.1720287071341835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255320421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4271527,0.16173925,0.032454293,0.2743995,0.0038405773,0.00024815413,0.008093377,0.0009030941,0.0911691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8878042,0.057907272,0.02562225,0.016192585,0.0048841843,0.00018373951,0.0032168056,0.000716232,0.0034727557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8850791,0.038928904,0.016427072,0.009066138,0.04879053,0.0017081962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3855865,0.40873414,0.06532035,0.033227358,0.10403032,0.0031012576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09733224,0.00055274885,0.0010385381,0.032980595,0.0024379801,0.01311695,0.0025914737,0.0025618784,0.0013167973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36885732,0.0007581612,0.00078521535,0.06805094,0.009962506,0.016446533,0.004613508,0.0057997517,0.000794127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021956782,0.000068394445,0.2705388,0.0028619831,0.00027585347,0.0002759108,0.03221588,0.000578517,0.0015229478,0.1067494,0.035512254,0.54918045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022401675,0.00018575131,0.46192497,0.007874414,0.0002105371,0.0022922442,0.04347772,0.0031518873,0.003969957,0.034573786,0.44193935,0.0003769008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011507401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01276019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006457763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5147482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255647893","doi":"10.4995/carma2016.2016.3140","title":"Validation of a web mining technique to measure innovation in the Canadian nanotechnology-related community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Measure (data warehouse); Data science; Intellectual property; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Data mining; Finance","score_opus":0.5503541756515045,"score_gpt":0.5194385616130678,"score_spread":0.03091561403843668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255647893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89120215,0.0008310347,0.057641137,0.0010495804,0.00013033091,0.0028465572,0.010751743,0.00064610934,0.034901254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88054657,0.0003752962,0.10734784,0.00018444701,0.00004955091,0.002308239,0.005494686,0.00009502453,0.0035983832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839324,0.0037677153,0.0011592188,0.0011380113,0.0091769,0.0008257138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176082,0.031180333,0.006196224,0.0049578156,0.038282525,0.0017749185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018146839,0.0006625023,0.00064354425,0.022501627,0.002786812,0.0029314067,0.0015935457,0.000741337,0.0019572154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076188974,0.00024469502,0.000816323,0.024390072,0.00093777507,0.0013503202,0.0016728975,0.00065077806,0.00066149945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656423,0.00071797613,0.7106898,0.0007619902,0.0004222336,0.00042159104,0.0077205715,0.0037407735,0.009455456,0.0049533197,0.0051682577,0.25558236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072862545,0.00027986502,0.9436511,0.00022314892,0.0001374314,0.0002853843,0.005852764,0.023058973,0.006857505,0.0012650472,0.018228507,0.00008750513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5475352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5988822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99393207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006067958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018109605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91025895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255944529","doi":"10.32744/pse.2020.3.39","title":"Migration of scientists: digital footprint and scientometry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives of science and education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Footprint; Ecological footprint; Computer science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Archaeology; Sustainability; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.3431088610623212,"score_gpt":0.5447872252527376,"score_spread":0.2016783641904164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255944529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43910736,0.041821364,0.07642913,0.03584544,0.0019102796,0.0006379095,0.020301139,0.001004805,0.38294247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94099206,0.014626388,0.024724431,0.0014902959,0.0012040904,0.0004678975,0.0042464626,0.00017643481,0.012072071],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295956,0.002909129,0.0006514686,0.0011319633,0.0020059259,0.0003419438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97540295,0.011251319,0.005494825,0.003707812,0.0032422007,0.00090092997],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058822036,0.00044849,0.0007718395,0.025716158,0.0021496273,0.0087273875,0.0009735322,0.0012501297,0.007033968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03268412,0.0002573502,0.0005843048,0.051962487,0.0050839502,0.012957482,0.0057633664,0.0008294383,0.0011366237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023832895,0.00014787601,0.18193612,0.0021061893,0.00034807232,0.0005360617,0.025058797,0.0029503002,0.0005304069,0.3384552,0.032762922,0.41492978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035535035,0.0001444332,0.25697213,0.0025565093,0.00020139055,0.0017505443,0.05502039,0.0070718117,0.00093970133,0.30907735,0.36604843,0.00018175686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063191177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004357582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024352947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018464186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031108439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256241895","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/542n3","title":"Work it: Looking At Labour And Compensation In Non-Commercial, Scholarly, Canadian Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Publishing; Position (finance); Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sustainability; Political science; Public relations; Business; Accounting; Sociology; Psychology; Finance; Social science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5588967396540135,"score_gpt":0.5537658840576342,"score_spread":0.00513085559637938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256241895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413086,0.0017992294,0.00029743835,0.009541626,0.00013390931,0.000094079325,0.00037333643,0.000018545787,0.04643324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950754,0.00075471814,0.00020254032,0.000671274,0.00004362728,0.000025486424,0.00015330198,0.000009243591,0.0030643095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789781,0.0045901015,0.0012580765,0.00076855696,0.010800425,0.003604713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91364574,0.018499551,0.021272734,0.0018002436,0.024762738,0.020019082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010690726,0.0003410568,0.0004572438,0.008861487,0.014362774,0.009665742,0.0025744336,0.0011073204,0.006890529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06179076,0.00030293036,0.0003045227,0.01344362,0.009044219,0.0042132386,0.005330693,0.0013384058,0.0005289055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002267027,0.00017161545,0.48285365,0.000844013,0.000085388056,0.0008472239,0.39257792,0.00029890003,0.00079850777,0.009028221,0.016455047,0.09581284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015915033,0.00007640214,0.46162093,0.0005375485,0.00001963223,0.00019325179,0.49317366,0.00021892169,0.00015894973,0.0013593986,0.042546578,0.00007872417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84107155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054778222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07115933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39744568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280522756","doi":"10.3389/frsc.2022.832506","title":"We Have Sent Ourselves to Iceland (With Apologies to Iceland): Changing the Academy From Internally-Driven to Externally Partnered","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Ocean Nexus Center, EarthLab, University of Washington; Nippon Foundation; EarthLab, University of Washington; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Ocean Frontier Institute; University of Washington","keywords":"Excellence; Prestige; Sustainability; Public relations; Sociology; Relevance (law); Higher education; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Power (physics); Accountability; Law","score_opus":0.21511460786629857,"score_gpt":0.45916021267100127,"score_spread":0.2440456048047027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280522756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027783993,0.0141699035,0.0005841045,0.6948984,0.25625387,0.000013097059,0.00013080862,0.00011449159,0.031056866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08383606,0.020101799,0.004025044,0.591285,0.071869425,0.000060789902,0.0003279146,0.00065669,0.22783734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979107,0.00054085825,0.00015956727,0.00035479772,0.0005602922,0.00047381897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939826,0.0011392256,0.0003876835,0.000302887,0.0017756217,0.0024119236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036556602,0.00073178957,0.0006450947,0.0005940965,0.0077334885,0.0126490025,0.0010570443,0.0043870057,0.020681132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010333043,0.0002453648,0.000725844,0.0004942144,0.0062368065,0.0074204663,0.004219619,0.013831072,0.010033922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044322227,0.000018603823,0.0005589099,0.00006587776,0.000009837672,0.0002601399,0.0011805455,0.00009273647,0.00019066925,0.0137753,0.96931624,0.014486744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042388697,0.000014073931,0.0008218581,0.00019478831,0.00000604538,0.00013439645,0.0022908812,0.000056135694,0.00020285188,0.0032361092,0.9930114,0.00002717731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015824724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02049637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99226654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004712604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007152206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280588024","doi":"10.1101/2022.05.12.22275000","title":"Academic dependency: the influence of the prevailing international biomedical research agenda on Argentina’s CONICET","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Institution; Political science; Psychological intervention; Translational research; Social science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7040941020838678,"score_gpt":0.6273682825226888,"score_spread":0.07672581956117897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280588024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7810282,0.016816111,0.0026868896,0.034034234,0.0007790307,0.00029009735,0.0023134742,0.000098933844,0.16195305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156684,0.0037589264,0.00081858103,0.0008334331,0.0001903079,0.00012091481,0.0005337124,0.00004243724,0.0021348433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98078144,0.008689498,0.0022083726,0.0021231729,0.004187892,0.0020096889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91307867,0.048413005,0.016892243,0.0034325402,0.010260992,0.007922567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023985844,0.00038322783,0.0008292664,0.008551904,0.004170062,0.012380677,0.00085407734,0.0011379952,0.0076862876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05844559,0.00028778982,0.0002741479,0.015848663,0.004693634,0.0042933174,0.006024883,0.0013862982,0.00046204962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012108987,0.00027208263,0.46162415,0.005995007,0.0003068147,0.0038414232,0.17097326,0.00080214144,0.0037164486,0.16650002,0.026452247,0.1583055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013884646,0.00022009981,0.5122971,0.004467341,0.00021653432,0.0006928909,0.15761608,0.0008450866,0.001110358,0.016449817,0.30583572,0.000110167886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021398773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019237924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99582994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009147891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012824788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12685078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281255308","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04387-6","title":"Measuring the disparity among scientific disciplines using Library of Congress Subject Headings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library of congress; Computer science; Information retrieval; Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Library science; Data science; Scientific communication","score_opus":0.6099867867029692,"score_gpt":0.5220149078759858,"score_spread":0.08797187882698343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281255308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791364,0.0013401757,0.0028747017,0.00043508637,0.00005894063,0.0000745046,0.0045718825,0.000063571584,0.011444757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941393,0.00042625336,0.0018781639,0.0000615143,0.00008203435,0.000053966603,0.0029431742,0.000012059816,0.00040356125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98836726,0.0030918154,0.0017571866,0.00096452597,0.0051247287,0.00069449283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508976,0.024693575,0.011281314,0.003097896,0.0086761955,0.00135361],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00905817,0.000318356,0.0007619849,0.028528076,0.0008269196,0.004264819,0.0004934448,0.0005896189,0.0024995916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082309864,0.00015548297,0.0005827675,0.042428747,0.00061271543,0.0026409996,0.0028739145,0.00058845896,0.00072237744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013134861,0.00007891841,0.9460102,0.00019334561,0.00029918866,0.000037194186,0.0014974256,0.00043305155,0.0013236069,0.0034722183,0.0013968134,0.045126677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018350225,0.00010537392,0.9811446,0.00008319585,0.00016486295,0.000117045456,0.0038351112,0.0020103639,0.0015573575,0.0045254207,0.006410291,0.000027829912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009133617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066255876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002409132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04790473},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4281566488","doi":"10.1016/j.niox.2022.05.003","title":"The silver jubilee of the Nitric Oxide journal: From 1997 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nitric Oxide","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Index (typography); Library science; Citation; Citation database; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.3062178411669722,"score_gpt":0.48677594134080604,"score_spread":0.18055810017383384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281566488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062041286,0.11906848,0.0012020349,0.47737,0.21694419,0.0001355322,0.021009307,0.00035668572,0.101872504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3788646,0.07802837,0.0032192196,0.084420726,0.09529921,0.0004047968,0.026611669,0.00055720605,0.33259425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.00016828095,0.000114760274,0.00022514853,0.0011058338,0.0005188352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043196,0.0009720368,0.0012947407,0.00023385919,0.0033797063,0.0036876875],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003790478,0.0005122735,0.000534637,0.003687464,0.0015995093,0.0062452354,0.0008272171,0.0031278995,0.012292868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687036,0.00021815364,0.0003318824,0.004509542,0.0010078868,0.0034045032,0.0033966687,0.0033281236,0.004593687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064893876,0.00006356092,0.006424411,0.00043758148,0.000023413082,0.00031485758,0.00028017903,0.00013480303,0.00036464707,0.009771747,0.87587035,0.10566551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028900473,0.000031250558,0.01668104,0.00023917544,0.00000988924,0.00009354819,0.00034046778,0.00006675814,0.00020708347,0.0011810333,0.98110914,0.000011674287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017634647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030394275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99631256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004712094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009418597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041123748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283219711","doi":"10.2196/38935","title":"Published Research on COVID-19 in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Library science; Bibliometrics; China; Geography; Political science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Disease; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.8393217506797268,"score_gpt":0.7077956684685817,"score_spread":0.13152608221114515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283219711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47320232,0.3461298,0.0052993456,0.008863971,0.00073164696,0.0021010302,0.1102748,0.0005737677,0.052823305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7655556,0.18448976,0.012671571,0.00056253525,0.000785534,0.0016840261,0.03188485,0.00012377191,0.0022423305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837827,0.0031367624,0.0047890167,0.0012302877,0.006401116,0.00066016073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9167886,0.053760026,0.014231681,0.0017557179,0.012280674,0.001183354],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013252091,0.0008061631,0.0029173542,0.20267239,0.0014766889,0.0064966413,0.0010454078,0.00085492054,0.005405372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079647966,0.00033032746,0.0021363106,0.27199712,0.0011594589,0.0036698547,0.0027501592,0.00053382234,0.00081038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000517691,0.00017595603,0.28936747,0.15428337,0.004524483,0.0017648935,0.012387875,0.0021331194,0.0016087365,0.008952072,0.036251448,0.488033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014481645,0.00030785298,0.6618192,0.0572931,0.008143014,0.0033261222,0.023900282,0.0045805224,0.001964887,0.008552411,0.22968051,0.0002872676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007886472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078338655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79732764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035111262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085996585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07008463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283220805","doi":"10.1007/s40037-022-00717-9","title":"Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal &lt;em&gt;Perspectives on Medical Education&lt;/em&gt;","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Metadata; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.3729390460331222,"score_gpt":0.5601110664533843,"score_spread":0.18717202042026204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283220805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9322114,0.013090937,0.016304238,0.01456253,0.00025037862,0.0014860978,0.0023603137,0.00011665772,0.019617436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703406,0.0039616628,0.021894827,0.00078584795,0.00020275792,0.0009872298,0.00092414714,0.00009267463,0.00081034977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.82491374,0.13037483,0.012903777,0.00643587,0.022283202,0.00308858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5015007,0.40724936,0.045080706,0.022711366,0.019832244,0.0036256006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.124765016,0.000731195,0.0019284931,0.045048065,0.00867016,0.013032096,0.0031283232,0.0033729302,0.0023751007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26030296,0.00089221087,0.0021239736,0.08446629,0.006037547,0.01421659,0.007706714,0.0016381993,0.00036060327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005336338,0.0005913861,0.50484115,0.008656055,0.0020546925,0.0099000055,0.3111628,0.0012226898,0.0012365292,0.040428743,0.0108476,0.10852473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001725672,0.00057287107,0.24322358,0.012303766,0.0019979698,0.009726923,0.59363174,0.010278166,0.0030176314,0.0274284,0.097338386,0.00030801565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007683342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015769523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95495194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103040105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009763275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65982836},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4283457399","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.13831","title":"How Open Is the U15? A Preliminary Analysis of Open Access Publishing in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mandate; Library science; Open science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Open data; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7234356462162446,"score_gpt":0.5724775161838102,"score_spread":0.1509581300324344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95888084,0.0028818084,0.00037791315,0.0031199725,0.000029530402,0.00013953442,0.003425698,0.000037018486,0.03110773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945773,0.0013957287,0.0006653739,0.00026383708,0.000015610309,0.00005152786,0.000911053,0.000020161113,0.0020993943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850926,0.0012708259,0.0010752793,0.00089113094,0.0092242,0.0024459197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385791,0.013572311,0.010665507,0.001580307,0.029550344,0.006052436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008131517,0.00034259853,0.0006327272,0.019897602,0.012128507,0.013697831,0.0023179883,0.00066795613,0.0036466417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044621315,0.00032673936,0.00055995374,0.06534024,0.005205448,0.003661702,0.0052196137,0.0007560199,0.0003193028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021900755,0.00006881987,0.714626,0.0010541326,0.00013031921,0.0004230083,0.17683476,0.00023844818,0.00088854186,0.016154783,0.0070751105,0.08228711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056703084,0.000039591683,0.80615914,0.00039881113,0.00008620742,0.000110694105,0.15925594,0.0003232182,0.00045012633,0.0005974253,0.032509744,0.00006348492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97769743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98335415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99768203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08723429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13139851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63293207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283802616","doi":"10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14149","title":"Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada: A national comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Lagging; Political science; Compliance (psychology); Discipline; Momentum (technical analysis); Library science; Medicine; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5376084805342523,"score_gpt":0.5023064140048592,"score_spread":0.03530206652939305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283802616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8159461,0.037241872,0.0013650255,0.010475166,0.0002928709,0.0003634956,0.07378078,0.00027563822,0.060259018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97274405,0.010208326,0.00095485453,0.0007160572,0.000056224908,0.00009479457,0.011331476,0.000065401044,0.0038287593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554426,0.00079597934,0.0017386217,0.0015827441,0.008320133,0.0020181583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8997086,0.012057792,0.013242199,0.003340332,0.063776866,0.007874212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008453885,0.00037991605,0.0013942297,0.01974176,0.004487503,0.0053155855,0.0021416435,0.0007789729,0.0044174283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04100651,0.00033967674,0.0011370011,0.049306788,0.0023053237,0.0020110912,0.0030785685,0.0007405458,0.00040731404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005168918,0.00008598525,0.87688535,0.0021741951,0.00083147053,0.00037470055,0.009583224,0.0005888271,0.0009405052,0.008922811,0.023946358,0.07514958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001799187,0.000031467112,0.97543305,0.00031417768,0.00014000441,0.00014650637,0.0038155557,0.00024027762,0.00020112126,0.00023242002,0.019371241,0.00005635883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99196845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99785835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09314594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1316307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6758242},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4284704491","doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01397-5","title":"Public use and public funding of science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Open Philanthropy Project; Northwestern University; Peter G. Peterson Foundation; U.S. Department of Defense; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.7498465858020251,"score_gpt":0.5763100365894401,"score_spread":0.173536549212585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284704491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6196843,0.012883349,0.0039501586,0.12593098,0.00063358655,0.00007796337,0.0019742877,0.00018385534,0.23468144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562645,0.000984992,0.00015278802,0.0005057943,0.00029319286,0.000021457106,0.00017121747,0.000014615099,0.0022295315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730462,0.013173834,0.0015624685,0.0008031845,0.0074066995,0.0040076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6533436,0.23422287,0.049362376,0.017938698,0.027848713,0.017283687],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028606698,0.00023525173,0.0007764265,0.009738173,0.00230004,0.011284403,0.0011188681,0.0039185015,0.0168996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18162036,0.00037252458,0.00066981313,0.011598384,0.0049495636,0.0070477906,0.0053290906,0.0030775573,0.0008897167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014359073,0.0008877681,0.39527455,0.0011102585,0.00089674443,0.0005648867,0.007569708,0.0047664978,0.00097574893,0.34015736,0.038467877,0.20789272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005478651,0.00030731535,0.46546027,0.0018099154,0.0005603443,0.00067148433,0.015621906,0.008291531,0.0022169373,0.36310458,0.14124851,0.00015929359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010660313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010465634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99026185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007878562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014323263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15128851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285099050","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100429","title":"Evolution of the thematic structure and main producers of physical therapy interventions research: A bibliometric analysis (1986 to 2017)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade da Coruña; University of Sydney","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Bibliometrics; Thematic analysis; Promotion (chess); Rehabilitation; Citation; Health care; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; Physical therapy; Nursing; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.45671230187067496,"score_gpt":0.5589605809942407,"score_spread":0.10224827912356577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285099050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7253288,0.14907445,0.020049665,0.010670135,0.00095107045,0.0045084143,0.056342103,0.0006468672,0.032428514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88964295,0.058770385,0.02612449,0.00048451795,0.00059479027,0.004184076,0.018074911,0.00022642878,0.0018975345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9385791,0.0156094,0.018522168,0.003946953,0.021602606,0.0017396837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75150955,0.14229015,0.043474324,0.0078048944,0.052733157,0.0021878984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05784502,0.0010315783,0.0036044659,0.22417729,0.0022573392,0.01160547,0.001594467,0.0012521729,0.0024167912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23998877,0.00082698977,0.0034459156,0.26662952,0.0025362207,0.0073622703,0.0061277277,0.0009514001,0.0005225943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093324593,0.00013891769,0.38981816,0.07908385,0.0065352474,0.0008705572,0.04139244,0.0026487436,0.0034590168,0.01611687,0.01963995,0.43936294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018421469,0.0002845445,0.8011533,0.029973168,0.007910153,0.0013453043,0.04006531,0.0059399093,0.0029705933,0.0154308975,0.09444963,0.00029302828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066963234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004552627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009976564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015176522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30591732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285156024","doi":"10.7202/1089191ar","title":"Bibliothèques universitaires et usage de la bibliométrie dans l’évaluation de la performance de la recherche","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.46655375761439644,"score_gpt":0.573577256834977,"score_spread":0.10702349922058052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285156024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19736324,0.054225035,0.14622632,0.012031528,0.0013959773,0.0012716969,0.028844208,0.003913759,0.5547282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7850516,0.023909906,0.13180278,0.00087370886,0.0007980673,0.0020981235,0.008190401,0.0010713913,0.046204105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8619907,0.05843173,0.013962183,0.0050204336,0.058638252,0.0019567995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78478724,0.11671786,0.023349077,0.013010745,0.060004193,0.0021308986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05479435,0.0011649999,0.0023753524,0.048023406,0.003034035,0.01773261,0.0016112607,0.0020558487,0.017097117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16744858,0.00083080947,0.0021365555,0.08231186,0.0029684193,0.00855539,0.0034330364,0.002140467,0.0067365137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005679668,0.00024591052,0.15910698,0.010146368,0.001718294,0.0002827909,0.014589955,0.0074735265,0.0056669153,0.10503898,0.030952264,0.66420996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008308902,0.00045653532,0.49807352,0.005540547,0.0009067962,0.0011642271,0.010982238,0.012771301,0.013647098,0.035379745,0.42044395,0.00055097986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036865562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043170884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010622917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013292382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28978372},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285385896","doi":"10.7202/1090527ar","title":"Aux abonnés absents ? Les sciences infirmières et le libre accès","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.8635168045882378,"score_gpt":0.7189879502636487,"score_spread":0.14452885432458906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285385896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19185406,0.16223586,0.0031039207,0.48389164,0.0058284416,0.00007469115,0.0068479883,0.0002237671,0.14593968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800111,0.044821244,0.002083117,0.025581513,0.0048134658,0.00012392439,0.0022413232,0.00013629667,0.040187985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801497,0.008586361,0.001528053,0.0012458245,0.006591568,0.0018984673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92546743,0.029196378,0.015864324,0.002505382,0.015559128,0.011407329],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014950092,0.0003495962,0.0011247713,0.00880946,0.0034363382,0.015003519,0.00080702204,0.0030053628,0.02819844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09382534,0.00032200673,0.0004431031,0.021977276,0.0040684007,0.019387104,0.0049225595,0.0041087214,0.004098763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011712189,0.00029862192,0.13376871,0.0042015063,0.000269634,0.00079512154,0.022645488,0.00027598807,0.0008717142,0.13222106,0.20137538,0.50210553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012956974,0.0003186253,0.20492907,0.0048400196,0.0002944058,0.0022898759,0.051176112,0.0003976057,0.0010199326,0.049716137,0.6847175,0.00017112213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022668121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026628595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99919295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005166824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073516453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09433323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285388864","doi":"10.7202/1090526ar","title":"L’évaluation par les pairs des travaux de recherche : un processus essentiel, mais imparfait et mal-aimé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9141054657536631,"score_gpt":0.7089123506943387,"score_spread":0.20519311505932447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285388864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14704846,0.050953437,0.49967983,0.17298439,0.01188164,0.012932195,0.003345565,0.0029821168,0.0981924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44749245,0.0059621073,0.5093853,0.0072249114,0.002691549,0.008213902,0.0019367686,0.0010174519,0.016075613],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3622976,0.46335375,0.036837183,0.016012747,0.1164806,0.005018155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29196343,0.43722394,0.039317142,0.05907566,0.16025926,0.012160644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36623895,0.0026335258,0.004574728,0.013620182,0.007733408,0.025232196,0.005358079,0.0056987586,0.008680481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58271587,0.0018723585,0.003688969,0.012391485,0.010113698,0.024731113,0.01789463,0.008326851,0.004129214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017345872,0.0006419136,0.01900651,0.0073407795,0.0017914172,0.00057995185,0.035313636,0.0020449527,0.005889402,0.086992376,0.050244946,0.78841954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011416777,0.0038146803,0.05424889,0.014801415,0.0022175733,0.0023153538,0.06554974,0.020226331,0.03065442,0.3131211,0.49049297,0.0014158158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067976895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071971877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63376105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011843127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036635354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7815402},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285490980","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04466-8","title":"Scientometric portraits of recognized scientists: a structured literature review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Portrait; Scientometrics; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Information retrieval; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.4423497706215747,"score_gpt":0.5649995372104198,"score_spread":0.12264976658884513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285490980","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03977888,0.8299387,0.013566956,0.045562588,0.0015784306,0.00040051402,0.0039740535,0.00012979135,0.06507011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2392446,0.7262555,0.019602465,0.005213398,0.0018534998,0.0004043664,0.0029574556,0.000083332074,0.0043853954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154377,0.0031644024,0.0011628366,0.00074694114,0.0030789822,0.00030296386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472717,0.03642162,0.005779069,0.0012366745,0.008665223,0.0006257683],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011263212,0.0006056923,0.00080938835,0.076338746,0.0020916169,0.007469592,0.0012725785,0.0017175875,0.0030899828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04682267,0.00046509225,0.0010407938,0.067611024,0.0021694542,0.009373881,0.0022454048,0.0020767713,0.0008977191],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016465619,0.00007386916,0.0140138045,0.029257657,0.000718251,0.0010509352,0.020804735,0.001716004,0.0035363233,0.10420129,0.05950034,0.764962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029089488,0.00015181207,0.051137216,0.06443088,0.00096321787,0.0022245215,0.027908616,0.0015843057,0.0020805714,0.060825855,0.7885423,0.0001215959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036731423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012059056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92366123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004943159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008451982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05956626},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285536268","doi":"10.7202/1088349ar","title":"Open access in translation and interpreting studies: A bibliometric overview of its impact (1996-2015)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona","keywords":"Citation; Dimension (graph theory); Phenomenon; Political science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8350388835682824,"score_gpt":0.6703756137444059,"score_spread":0.16466326982387647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285536268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27844957,0.55836415,0.011643295,0.014085615,0.0012234987,0.0009101879,0.032093994,0.00053669466,0.10269302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632629,0.29036334,0.018220069,0.0007039187,0.0018909597,0.0006988586,0.019133374,0.00024187425,0.0054846797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596695,0.008516814,0.009717088,0.0027604625,0.01835119,0.0009851175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8667067,0.072674714,0.025873896,0.0066507854,0.02605274,0.0020411678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03070171,0.00075792614,0.0014803184,0.14954315,0.0018516241,0.0098805595,0.0009962536,0.0010127771,0.004099647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103366345,0.00044404628,0.0014499086,0.28982487,0.0030614703,0.008802738,0.0047552674,0.0009176374,0.0011949815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023872545,0.00007983324,0.239288,0.021468155,0.0011605483,0.00050625106,0.014456128,0.0013648731,0.002023564,0.038885403,0.021116212,0.65941226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026556285,0.00012518768,0.58162194,0.013034295,0.0008362496,0.0014118323,0.012817094,0.0014377142,0.0023447422,0.014958201,0.37124056,0.00014569383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006426665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99900377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057172026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069703674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16236812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285541547","doi":"10.7202/1088147ar","title":"Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Connections and Bridging Journals: The Evolution of Business Scholarship from 1990 to 2010","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management international","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Bridge (graph theory); Citation; Humanities; Sociology; Social network analysis; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.45204877096756485,"score_gpt":0.5574838491069153,"score_spread":0.10543507813935044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285541547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556767,0.027213693,0.00051491027,0.0035623927,0.00010962885,0.000017272294,0.0007001437,0.000034032302,0.012171294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98407793,0.012359232,0.000863892,0.00029170583,0.00027575938,0.000019103725,0.0007994127,0.000014049578,0.001298876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966214,0.00053154264,0.0004904136,0.00070129783,0.0013537209,0.00030167855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455639,0.022447929,0.019762931,0.0011298752,0.008058628,0.0030367253],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004069672,0.0002717978,0.00046631703,0.022165515,0.0010824564,0.004329076,0.00064212835,0.0011259854,0.0016188865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05145429,0.00022119167,0.00024424025,0.033960067,0.0015634187,0.005601579,0.0036018707,0.0007077563,0.00037443812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041639002,0.00020837151,0.62778395,0.0014621866,0.00020128989,0.0010063219,0.022153407,0.0015535437,0.002276744,0.016242374,0.0037183717,0.3229771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020978821,0.00010377732,0.94587713,0.00068225904,0.000085652755,0.0008446359,0.007603289,0.00073594647,0.00081998104,0.003707189,0.039482087,0.000036994614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011380696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020128073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97783446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004039493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032759975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029308736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285796512","doi":"10.1108/lht-05-2022-0262","title":"Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010–2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scopus; China; Scatter plot; Library science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6213886299954758,"score_gpt":0.5628100067022828,"score_spread":0.05857862329319308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285796512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92063904,0.020106051,0.001458237,0.005142726,0.00023832731,0.000109384884,0.018513206,0.0004483608,0.033344638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980949,0.0079642385,0.0018091301,0.000242839,0.00019467124,0.000062874315,0.005128511,0.000042140902,0.003606562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784195,0.00023332292,0.00029429822,0.00028101396,0.00092419365,0.000425212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873116,0.0027436998,0.004485631,0.00061176444,0.0031313216,0.0017159126],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021433167,0.000425305,0.00040899764,0.012290229,0.0006737226,0.0048743533,0.0007308212,0.0003637383,0.002615421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008843651,0.00016902013,0.000576462,0.02115052,0.00042393483,0.0015569911,0.0016433548,0.00048072895,0.0012116601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025144045,0.00009107473,0.74772507,0.002571376,0.0003254539,0.0016232396,0.0034985726,0.0020000208,0.0038222848,0.0040986254,0.014540262,0.21945256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005172209,0.000106923864,0.9551682,0.00036499233,0.0001528717,0.001151896,0.0036177726,0.00064982096,0.00200008,0.00051713653,0.03623016,0.00003507873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009474295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010042062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98770976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026573832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006159381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019280732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286839525","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0268433","title":"The General Growth Tendency: A tool to improve publication trend reporting by removing record inflation bias and enabling quantitative trend analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Inflation (cosmology); Data science; Trend analysis; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5806747774211096,"score_gpt":0.489541160675649,"score_spread":0.09113361674546061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286839525","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12710913,0.002407905,0.7747163,0.0020778403,0.0009697977,0.0021459088,0.044248287,0.02696264,0.019362245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39151353,0.00076201354,0.5786619,0.00032598875,0.00042998724,0.004211115,0.018293088,0.0023032993,0.0034991135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95918477,0.0142324045,0.010500564,0.00459303,0.010631513,0.00085774896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77519727,0.12258066,0.041103758,0.024236992,0.035374783,0.0015064854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055917338,0.0012838544,0.0016432733,0.030393578,0.00095482805,0.0060706707,0.0016286954,0.0013349957,0.0065732296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23969398,0.00065802794,0.0020745185,0.03904568,0.00084239664,0.0054817176,0.003240527,0.0014125725,0.0023880815],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006874291,0.00019203922,0.22495744,0.003823402,0.0019063221,0.00036357247,0.0050735,0.0076230634,0.006930529,0.026752638,0.052108366,0.6695817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043287038,0.001130905,0.43731415,0.0016524433,0.0020018832,0.0016693112,0.0041021914,0.16577525,0.029284399,0.067094706,0.28844965,0.0010923337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023429294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031543106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013963358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033384552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29572266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287777058","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.09381","title":"Open Access effect on uncitedness: A large-scale study controlling by\\n discipline, source type and visibility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Subject (documents); Quartile; Scopus; Percentile; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Political science; History; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.6244240785590196,"score_gpt":0.4855437975336719,"score_spread":0.13888028102534772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287777058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934389,0.0010332315,0.0011212869,0.00023548926,0.00003014248,0.000025811287,0.0012951515,0.000038839782,0.002781157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975171,0.00019452584,0.00017814012,0.00003217137,0.00004175834,0.000015320587,0.0008127757,0.000025008634,0.0011831981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934549,0.0022503107,0.000708939,0.0013723501,0.0014659817,0.0007475027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84649944,0.08507577,0.044653084,0.01077993,0.0043887333,0.008603112],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007482337,0.00030530177,0.000679159,0.0036023601,0.00086585357,0.0027519134,0.0013917311,0.0009587498,0.007592083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045828268,0.00019922244,0.0015887363,0.008172485,0.0013869083,0.0027061687,0.0023960823,0.0012587635,0.0012481373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048846536,0.00015559264,0.9904759,0.00008761949,0.0007386852,0.00021393642,0.0009417823,0.00030236525,0.00025664121,0.0004775714,0.00048339053,0.005377992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009871233,0.00018959545,0.9967939,0.000022693628,0.00022562606,0.000103415936,0.0006354969,0.0005776688,0.00024332096,0.0002865499,0.0008993283,0.000012558489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009342036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008265842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051158917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086223264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039570868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287877402","doi":"10.3389/frma.2022.838553","title":"Closed Shop or Collaborative Hub? An Analysis of the Partners' Importance in CANZUK Countries' Research Collaborations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Developing country; Regional science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.7240881977782228,"score_gpt":0.6496951819978779,"score_spread":0.07439301578034485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287877402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98996186,0.000547352,0.0009566448,0.00020277777,0.00001793826,0.000028203842,0.00018658652,0.000009138346,0.008089558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989506,0.00016955503,0.00041262724,0.000009931951,0.0000043341765,0.000014063088,0.00010646069,0.0000027976685,0.0003296321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959104,0.0015752316,0.00045218074,0.00050972245,0.0008855203,0.00066684873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97515213,0.01200472,0.006022451,0.0010253453,0.003161631,0.0026337805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050798343,0.00017937295,0.00047669146,0.007650488,0.0017108456,0.003951423,0.0004822428,0.000563562,0.0028560017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024882976,0.00017131963,0.00036062187,0.014050602,0.0011367714,0.0038914885,0.0029498038,0.00046043316,0.00026754173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002713081,0.00006843394,0.91189027,0.00027055127,0.00015358053,0.0009893165,0.021826267,0.0008309936,0.0005255528,0.0071678874,0.0012568072,0.054749034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017669485,0.00010772403,0.92675847,0.00017748888,0.00015767846,0.00055184716,0.05675873,0.0033371511,0.00044868066,0.0026821333,0.008957299,0.00004510706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060797147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007922909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99825674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017432376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018561445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026865065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288047051","doi":"10.1002/leap.1468","title":"Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the <i>International Political Science Review</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Discipline; Peer review; Psychology; Politics; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.6844844918702782,"score_gpt":0.6041826932687399,"score_spread":0.0803017986015383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288047051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7794815,0.14588958,0.0015867524,0.024731588,0.0013058656,0.00021385659,0.0039616954,0.00006919508,0.042760007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794263,0.016833905,0.00027310263,0.0011974367,0.00071928673,0.00005974974,0.0007983638,0.0000375367,0.00065431156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9019951,0.041374013,0.013613114,0.0061183553,0.03463181,0.0022675262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25144002,0.36769226,0.25360084,0.023859296,0.09122954,0.012178163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0710281,0.00023894964,0.00085145887,0.010208491,0.0012031479,0.0075480626,0.0016789968,0.0013973283,0.004278044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3735347,0.0004326684,0.00068514224,0.02060565,0.002729423,0.004932049,0.0029220101,0.0014218553,0.0011150085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009575017,0.00022121894,0.84527177,0.0068558212,0.00145838,0.00038188972,0.012171018,0.00015263064,0.00026644504,0.0037413135,0.020689683,0.107832305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008201346,0.00046972095,0.94506556,0.004529875,0.0006051202,0.0008627782,0.0071323165,0.00025517374,0.0004229128,0.0010642242,0.039446604,0.00006364619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035204114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00446546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002177242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004935774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.375637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288061104","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.046","title":"Research on major depression in China: A perspective from bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Affective Disorders","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Major Science and Technology Projects of China; Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission; Universidade de Macau","keywords":"China; Beijing; Major depressive disorder; Bibliometrics; Depression (economics); Web of science; Traditional Chinese medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Medicine; Library science; Alternative medicine; Meta-analysis; History; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.29015105777763206,"score_gpt":0.5769470050974079,"score_spread":0.28679594731977587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288061104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71635044,0.16479269,0.003215897,0.06368623,0.0008873708,0.00014021432,0.0025821945,0.00007652508,0.048268497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654507,0.031146199,0.0008902828,0.000886065,0.000509683,0.00001792273,0.0003831331,0.000003157642,0.0007129255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806887,0.00060845434,0.0002794818,0.00024167397,0.00059499074,0.00020650546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920421,0.0032452077,0.0018537611,0.00036452364,0.0017760678,0.00071841595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039304346,0.00037423705,0.00093139237,0.019844435,0.0015162178,0.0035155052,0.00064757414,0.0008712693,0.0011622426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008044568,0.00018150391,0.00047242103,0.032432374,0.0015417887,0.002239379,0.0013287732,0.0007256012,0.00007450385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010413328,0.0002052659,0.6382075,0.0037670794,0.0007569059,0.0011217634,0.008153659,0.0020499283,0.001503685,0.082409605,0.012176912,0.24954355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015998277,0.000105307765,0.95533156,0.001069873,0.00027396152,0.0002677347,0.008110499,0.0024323526,0.00038119854,0.014956765,0.017010473,0.000044250704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07028959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081834584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99606955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006416428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008647187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13976091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069887","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110997","title":"Peer review as a measurable responsibility of those who publish: The peer review debt index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Publication; Peer review; Psychology; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.8626940409841908,"score_gpt":0.6979094413014139,"score_spread":0.16478459968277692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12741433,0.11034241,0.067316845,0.25748536,0.018817177,0.0026872004,0.010452283,0.0024532755,0.40303114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87461305,0.032002844,0.04426625,0.005197803,0.010317002,0.0013177765,0.0032266825,0.0005009028,0.028557684],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9453817,0.01779132,0.006098951,0.0019468756,0.027618904,0.0011622221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6392951,0.12344665,0.06203963,0.014275535,0.13978608,0.021157008],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053329743,0.0005465739,0.0010738233,0.015371994,0.0022445163,0.012205274,0.0013297924,0.002093959,0.0053621386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31546497,0.0004131698,0.0004711301,0.015020101,0.002614512,0.009127065,0.0043863202,0.002145102,0.0017433049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025213155,0.00013740084,0.080498904,0.0014432619,0.00021898394,0.00016357277,0.0010115195,0.00061247934,0.00056990975,0.057510804,0.22506215,0.6325188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016981828,0.00036701988,0.25222397,0.0028673538,0.0007963775,0.0027158281,0.0026786667,0.009375082,0.0020764538,0.11493834,0.61146545,0.00032557957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054465053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006782408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019692672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28203803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288363742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1904.12919","title":"Female citation impact superiority 1996-2018 in six out of seven\\n English-speaking nations","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Disadvantage; Promotion (chess); Citation impact; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5314450835235536,"score_gpt":0.4130219790928477,"score_spread":0.11842310443070586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288363742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92243874,0.015673276,0.00012660303,0.002844723,0.00028604348,0.000014414279,0.031815045,0.00007066608,0.026730575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764296,0.004436153,0.00019234893,0.00018020636,0.00014417677,0.00001732399,0.011852982,0.00003196925,0.0067152353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993486,0.00009710656,0.00011073072,0.00012953563,0.00017623296,0.00013789863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495196,0.0010159891,0.0023674178,0.00027733576,0.00094929955,0.00043801288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013154492,0.0002324777,0.0003188,0.005440503,0.0005482681,0.0020047685,0.0002077642,0.00034266454,0.0040325047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067789303,0.00009423248,0.0003429642,0.011296396,0.00040527948,0.0012957125,0.0008657281,0.00031609286,0.000818001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046612174,0.000032762156,0.8957834,0.0010555908,0.00029862515,0.0006224412,0.0045868848,0.00019635278,0.00092334766,0.0034458686,0.019657983,0.072930604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054179245,0.000023757095,0.97819376,0.000087068904,0.000060610346,0.00014928335,0.0013870092,0.00006512018,0.0002658846,0.00017753351,0.019575182,0.000009495016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02562642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049316045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008603525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000990113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05095452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778517","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2021-0021","title":"Achieving a Professorship with Proper Academic Merit: Discouraging Questionable Publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Promotion (chess); Incentive; Public relations; Tracking (education); Process (computing); Position (finance); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5341701204214397,"score_gpt":0.515821418283463,"score_spread":0.01834870213797679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68122125,0.004185514,0.048125897,0.122199334,0.0019537527,0.0014733529,0.00015076152,0.0012948323,0.1393953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95864636,0.0008752033,0.02031562,0.008163399,0.0013833717,0.0005024597,0.000074455515,0.00016688865,0.0098722605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.885439,0.059677534,0.008346208,0.005140562,0.03504974,0.0063468693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48932004,0.2121558,0.13445193,0.04310444,0.058841806,0.062126044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08771318,0.00041282744,0.0011696322,0.004479394,0.009089953,0.017442109,0.0031986544,0.0049667796,0.0067280703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37671497,0.00076049817,0.0006229826,0.005464424,0.0063294102,0.008755348,0.010362311,0.004568212,0.0041289865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006712345,0.0019572163,0.2536491,0.0035168696,0.00025629325,0.0060098274,0.06537867,0.0012999915,0.011274514,0.118980296,0.08412669,0.45287925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042302135,0.0020763255,0.24004379,0.003264941,0.00019096547,0.00792641,0.050103754,0.005786001,0.010119634,0.18669434,0.49298674,0.00038405793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010702999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024714414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038920618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019176124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4638772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289847444","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608","title":"Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Factor (programming language); Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Physics; Law; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.7923014671715343,"score_gpt":0.6839056651468696,"score_spread":0.1083958020246647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289847444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89762384,0.0014703152,0.013942766,0.034035765,0.00013356276,0.00006273575,0.0002859825,0.00013692192,0.052308094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837315,0.00011485746,0.00051570963,0.00028436442,0.000060735347,0.000008751343,0.000025796378,0.000019572795,0.00059712504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832477,0.009388201,0.0006400643,0.001104568,0.0026425188,0.0029769107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8789347,0.06565415,0.025712762,0.004323836,0.010066007,0.015308534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017781263,0.00037890996,0.0010404255,0.005101551,0.0019731505,0.009530166,0.00087126106,0.0018584295,0.0053660367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123386994,0.00037847966,0.0003831818,0.006317716,0.0059487284,0.0103866765,0.0042321077,0.0017169293,0.00084698485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008030486,0.0005997462,0.5009661,0.00020830252,0.00053368683,0.00030609904,0.0050624297,0.009142574,0.0016441847,0.34486765,0.01291417,0.12295205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011680676,0.0003109734,0.3478766,0.00016726069,0.000127349,0.00018395428,0.01398628,0.027168373,0.0010291142,0.5926026,0.016301591,0.00012906772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092499135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014259322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99489844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040239035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004156729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09403741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289947407","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6796","title":"bioéconomie en France. Une étude scientométrique","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Région Hauts-de-France; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3532287396621265,"score_gpt":0.5104410862932277,"score_spread":0.15721234663110123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289947407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3077082,0.21298562,0.023806535,0.046567317,0.0015230791,0.00028736857,0.07191892,0.00081235456,0.33439064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85616964,0.06514709,0.019291906,0.0027299263,0.0013801346,0.00046630946,0.01765226,0.0002532975,0.036909513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263895,0.0022410701,0.0005817516,0.0009824903,0.003120605,0.00043519607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98670155,0.0058305142,0.0022428944,0.00073269184,0.0041388073,0.00035352222],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059681227,0.0005872398,0.000893012,0.02461232,0.0021781204,0.007935062,0.0006866735,0.001178301,0.011944519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016137838,0.0002515928,0.00095963164,0.048702568,0.0012971084,0.0034648986,0.0017517653,0.0009703088,0.001744722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001636246,0.00009592181,0.17126311,0.004137031,0.0006315252,0.0008426622,0.01735907,0.0040298738,0.0013689365,0.2222909,0.05783447,0.5199829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019157205,0.00006902071,0.38272324,0.0017419994,0.0001183033,0.0005637047,0.008474635,0.0012389607,0.0007841842,0.014994595,0.58917487,0.000097390985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2789769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20656925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012492735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010521523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5547061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290546285","doi":"10.29173/cais1262","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Oligopoly; Agency (philosophy); Library science; Publishing; Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.40441269756483084,"score_gpt":0.5025465979353135,"score_spread":0.0981339003704827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290546285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6525743,0.0054021985,0.010232476,0.012798319,0.00024776754,0.00014908907,0.0019141327,0.0002056723,0.31647614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98770124,0.0011749297,0.0012027224,0.0007463936,0.000096111995,0.000018982948,0.0003430116,0.000028882392,0.008687817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928598,0.0010027093,0.0003123559,0.0011227598,0.0036170862,0.0010852779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98243284,0.0050548883,0.005358767,0.0011167303,0.0031062264,0.0029305848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032629643,0.00019236282,0.0003652317,0.0047488427,0.0017872559,0.008993339,0.00052133924,0.0009196448,0.010084944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019877387,0.0003111114,0.00053128425,0.008953131,0.0033408597,0.00468949,0.0021786625,0.0011999398,0.0010885892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074847176,0.00024135505,0.36409608,0.0005594072,0.00033939586,0.0017747711,0.004408025,0.013260617,0.0029157947,0.39163154,0.03282427,0.18720023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083383464,0.00028900374,0.6574284,0.00032859662,0.00013081905,0.0013891526,0.007330412,0.014751614,0.0014183607,0.061584506,0.25513956,0.00012620365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07467023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098352134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99947864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009979971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077375183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14847118},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4290547061","doi":"10.29173/cais1245","title":"Factors influencing Canadian HASS researchers’ open access publishing practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Altruism (biology); Prestige; Test (biology); Variance (accounting); Psychology; Visibility; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Business; Geography; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.6978815989921062,"score_gpt":0.5439937719415102,"score_spread":0.153887827050596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290547061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96009815,0.002352872,0.00030643248,0.008458101,0.00009054733,0.00011143195,0.0013941368,0.000047523623,0.027140785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920677,0.0018835337,0.00052772515,0.00044036272,0.00003171328,0.00003176395,0.00033979723,0.000014063479,0.0046633603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902146,0.0012904125,0.00082486746,0.00070739805,0.0050120833,0.001950629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93055797,0.015118842,0.009091185,0.0019318784,0.028591704,0.014708434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009089593,0.00026412425,0.00049616006,0.007120606,0.011466354,0.0071308375,0.0014471903,0.00073153793,0.0052555073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035499856,0.00036863497,0.0004806185,0.018803129,0.0032120005,0.0013727956,0.0027423028,0.00073955924,0.00045821548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029350526,0.00012522223,0.7970792,0.00091608544,0.00012007664,0.0012826168,0.09855364,0.00032667772,0.0020520976,0.007498198,0.01297497,0.078777745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002842454,0.00009461763,0.8534405,0.00037206916,0.00007213757,0.0004977936,0.094345786,0.00043684038,0.0007274264,0.00083002716,0.04903071,0.00012373035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.962222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97710615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04638428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11645755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33654302},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4290779485","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0272730","title":"National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Scholarship; Political science; Bibliometrics; Information Dissemination; Library science; Business; Economic growth; Economics; World Wide Web; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.8288413072428364,"score_gpt":0.6094753142032667,"score_spread":0.21936599303956972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290779485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219653,0.008274678,0.0012489526,0.002792446,0.0001544182,0.0000656273,0.0038665407,0.000076550234,0.061555497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916574,0.003106492,0.00090704643,0.00023955906,0.000040680454,0.00005389747,0.0016458327,0.00003633028,0.0023128372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169827,0.002198033,0.0015341559,0.0010427063,0.0025217799,0.0010051287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462964,0.024372471,0.0120034795,0.005156137,0.009113513,0.0030580612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074738497,0.00013068541,0.00051311654,0.0063443785,0.00079428824,0.0036102145,0.0006909444,0.00037492142,0.0071835783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043485273,0.00018886226,0.0004788604,0.012610181,0.0009717002,0.0027523246,0.002422054,0.0005255756,0.0012231073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026450868,0.00013982378,0.7714826,0.0018927369,0.00042850184,0.0005516955,0.029951569,0.0003842784,0.0019273043,0.01559995,0.008001923,0.16937503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009692288,0.000052210806,0.94591,0.00063367235,0.000076960765,0.0005444861,0.013120809,0.0001885056,0.0007614583,0.0016597016,0.03700167,0.00004087597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004888949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007588846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99930906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011288519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015432046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039525986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291001315","doi":"10.1177/01455613221119051","title":"Does the journal impact factor predict individual article citation rate in otolaryngology journals?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ear Nose & Throat Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Citation analysis; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.4754316964445302,"score_gpt":0.5500120337683365,"score_spread":0.07458033732380631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291001315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96736073,0.018080702,0.004053186,0.0013707803,0.00037063626,0.00011858363,0.0043902947,0.00013156529,0.0041234465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940988,0.002181574,0.0015841173,0.000088108456,0.0003885274,0.00005169754,0.0012880674,0.000028657027,0.00029036572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871969,0.0022416539,0.0052101547,0.0010579985,0.0038210573,0.00047222184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7591727,0.11510286,0.08707618,0.009116619,0.025543941,0.0039877556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018980823,0.00041776497,0.0012337192,0.016216734,0.00050276524,0.002585434,0.0007289797,0.00069095916,0.0028519565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14847292,0.00025171254,0.0012258354,0.019929664,0.0007269785,0.004289379,0.0011915432,0.000535,0.0011136188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010919705,0.000022165692,0.9830797,0.00035349926,0.00024518356,0.00006240365,0.0002284534,0.00015656887,0.00030003925,0.0001503044,0.0004893499,0.014803181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013260684,0.00018137472,0.9933183,0.00021823062,0.00017132204,0.0007112698,0.0006165485,0.000925136,0.0004980588,0.0011718991,0.0021458361,0.000028622188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001216359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013481869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98378325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006849376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013882305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100381374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291284117","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0271998","title":"Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Productivity; Gender gap; Pandemic; Demography; Geography; Political science; Demographic economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.9412418565429493,"score_gpt":0.6705717960623854,"score_spread":0.27067006048056397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291284117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877939,0.001975174,0.00031732023,0.00021137237,0.0000106314865,0.000045480712,0.008518036,0.000017951324,0.0011101436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929236,0.0014032001,0.0004959478,0.0001051042,0.000023801113,0.00009189838,0.004189905,0.000019531732,0.00074704137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944752,0.0012993161,0.0016251197,0.0008942741,0.0011040667,0.00060210767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95280343,0.012244695,0.024422375,0.0023508826,0.0057318183,0.0024467167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049009877,0.00031312232,0.0009777136,0.011472176,0.00095246756,0.0025231072,0.0008287091,0.0007266853,0.0030835117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021699063,0.0005704051,0.0012922536,0.023313863,0.00076838955,0.00277525,0.0022809631,0.00080825883,0.0016280588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007524196,0.000032946977,0.99525154,0.0002178116,0.00015047436,0.000115615454,0.0009499676,0.000058742848,0.000091460046,0.00006995066,0.00055051,0.0024357326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052948467,0.00009775818,0.9935688,0.00010563489,0.00009810609,0.00055342994,0.0039202804,0.0001617206,0.000095080155,0.000061003528,0.0013153297,0.00001754258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075761867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009433152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013588953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015293864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025919259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291982736","doi":"","title":"A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Political science; Public economics; Psychology; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4513140322787154,"score_gpt":0.5260346446697138,"score_spread":0.07472061239099842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291982736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95681125,0.0036635878,0.0005293563,0.0066620787,0.00018114864,0.00018427843,0.0054100445,0.0000720754,0.026486324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948698,0.00068598485,0.00045157413,0.0004384707,0.00008594505,0.00007267801,0.0011934554,0.00003698083,0.002165055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9329384,0.014214653,0.014446311,0.0059775733,0.025369536,0.0070534996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4340181,0.2057469,0.24441928,0.03631778,0.060024537,0.019473435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037437357,0.00032798588,0.0010925079,0.013888717,0.0049328026,0.008725281,0.002518883,0.0016674387,0.010758857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3354836,0.0004946589,0.0007960052,0.039143905,0.0039621214,0.005422989,0.0049016248,0.0018273653,0.0010735047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079351553,0.00011306096,0.92830414,0.00079062063,0.00042830492,0.0007325125,0.015174798,0.00018851845,0.00071085757,0.005802464,0.014953311,0.032007862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002348958,0.000057556743,0.9687047,0.00036100298,0.00011440512,0.00042535938,0.00984708,0.00029787645,0.00041375306,0.0015409942,0.018136274,0.00007750589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14888176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.170739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006793194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017498247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29603034},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4292405002","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0014","title":"Publish or impoverish","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; China; Cash; Originality; Bibliometrics; Value (mathematics); Web of science; Business; Library science; Economics; Marketing; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Social science; Advertising; Sociology; Finance; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5056988741162761,"score_gpt":0.5706104721088965,"score_spread":0.06491159799262036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292405002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28638467,0.024658946,0.011523104,0.04994195,0.017475521,0.00094325497,0.0070226165,0.0030882796,0.59896165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86156034,0.009176063,0.004076477,0.009976023,0.009271504,0.0003463,0.0019360173,0.00048517168,0.10317207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672026,0.0026783838,0.0014066501,0.0012523731,0.006208296,0.0017339927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91733396,0.019474123,0.018418403,0.020199608,0.013068927,0.011505099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011509815,0.00038495462,0.0007226088,0.00376883,0.0021916702,0.009337708,0.0015372745,0.0010053795,0.045460086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058277093,0.00026297645,0.00059941015,0.006018339,0.0027158675,0.0044848747,0.0036714463,0.0011650127,0.019913143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053678796,0.00022242614,0.0818117,0.002265428,0.00030955632,0.0019291501,0.0032310358,0.0005449407,0.00558491,0.05998506,0.15467939,0.68889964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083706844,0.0003920456,0.0734239,0.00082811515,0.00019062901,0.0018345147,0.0031286676,0.0012298578,0.005191821,0.024429156,0.88914156,0.00012606503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017534774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018893542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021842094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007895461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1520791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292510728","doi":"10.6087/kcse.277","title":"Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration","keywords":"Directory; Library science; Scope (computer science); Publication; Variety (cybernetics); Publishing; Audience measurement; Scopus; Diamond; Diversity (politics); Bibliometrics; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.8758646529958605,"score_gpt":0.6987223672361662,"score_spread":0.17714228575969426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292510728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864157,0.0017514257,0.00038701727,0.00039003053,0.000018395645,0.00013140727,0.009085401,0.000024187493,0.0017965666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939288,0.001012747,0.0007502295,0.000111452915,0.000032581625,0.00010724979,0.0036977844,0.00001496586,0.00034406758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328554,0.0016504107,0.0016439026,0.00085106614,0.0020927254,0.00047639152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153932,0.018964898,0.046666335,0.0019643095,0.0116489595,0.0053623193],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007102573,0.00022896686,0.00062985014,0.012141883,0.0007535456,0.002648233,0.000980614,0.0005522712,0.002563615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033027846,0.00034027442,0.00052710425,0.014493898,0.0009717344,0.0033731705,0.0020086477,0.0007099369,0.00090128917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397906,0.00005010086,0.9925869,0.00024265012,0.000058868798,0.00008811308,0.0014724936,0.000053940534,0.00011396006,0.00010403538,0.0010886415,0.004066333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006721814,0.00010055695,0.99021393,0.00014580623,0.00003182331,0.00040003157,0.00604378,0.00018613542,0.000093100774,0.00008962453,0.002665287,0.000023299357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007408342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009501299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012872062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020033037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293160522","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-02312-5_2","title":"What Drives Serendipity Research?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Scholarship; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Everyday life; Point (geometry); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; History; Law","score_opus":0.32527453660856,"score_gpt":0.5099651811934768,"score_spread":0.1846906445849168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293160522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24483377,0.070549324,0.019939363,0.15249127,0.0033197724,0.0002106218,0.0013559761,0.00060658326,0.50669324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93874854,0.022264803,0.006343968,0.006292567,0.0028529335,0.00015682592,0.0004709074,0.0002913338,0.022578185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331653,0.0031045594,0.000272336,0.0010762057,0.0015216701,0.0007086111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385086,0.03863083,0.007157624,0.0040833037,0.005954377,0.005665085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013802554,0.00044915956,0.0009814258,0.0057436307,0.0023463136,0.013315685,0.0012656908,0.0018080935,0.023001505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0768654,0.0003398089,0.00046256348,0.009172768,0.005859078,0.011969825,0.0031451134,0.0019191891,0.005974304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036394416,0.00022709672,0.09011388,0.001866233,0.00022038128,0.00052436284,0.010896714,0.0009462816,0.001408688,0.46924892,0.051681645,0.3725018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009397751,0.00023087082,0.059715,0.002469944,0.00025212247,0.0007214496,0.01918043,0.0024303389,0.0030163368,0.6989028,0.21289466,0.000092074966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014589833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002452132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029650552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039644875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07694763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293224259","doi":"10.2196/39365","title":"An Evaluation of Primary Studies Published in Predatory Journals Included in Systematic Reviews From High-Impact Dermatology Journals: Cross-sectional Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Publishing; MEDLINE; Impact factor; Medicine; Family medicine; Grey literature; Data extraction; Directory; Publication bias; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.7449597743669143,"score_gpt":0.6623973011713971,"score_spread":0.08256247319551724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293224259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7732296,0.17845185,0.00845764,0.0015584825,0.0005630643,0.01621261,0.018318955,0.00012950454,0.0030782328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575285,0.012146916,0.0063470993,0.0013200608,0.00026826668,0.017864507,0.004085838,0.00007133167,0.00036755236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.64123905,0.093680136,0.19602638,0.020625878,0.044920746,0.0035077734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28003898,0.352111,0.29475036,0.022432765,0.046203036,0.004463906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18212031,0.0016026037,0.0072593302,0.03214169,0.002370599,0.0056307297,0.0029951446,0.002997075,0.0042722407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40837187,0.002355549,0.010322173,0.02916478,0.0031737778,0.008449189,0.007139881,0.0016989714,0.000976837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024541502,0.0003879813,0.87124354,0.07874902,0.029220268,0.0006541003,0.0050663846,0.00018557423,0.00071179477,0.0004219946,0.0010440896,0.009861077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009853509,0.0047197966,0.906214,0.03194723,0.0343766,0.003606953,0.009074463,0.000737935,0.001165164,0.0005752165,0.006352983,0.0002443345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002200957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042281733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045427643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00724862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96315575},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4293243777","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00205","title":"Visualizing academic descendants using modified Pavlo diagrams: Results based on five researchers in biomechanics and biomedicine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomedicine; Graduation (instrument); Mentorship; Computer science; Graduate students; Completeness (order theory); Data science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Medical education; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.9158299019598442,"score_gpt":0.7019936612882616,"score_spread":0.21383624067158258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293243777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8474289,0.0013310057,0.12298717,0.0009797434,0.00023364207,0.0004257697,0.0076726116,0.008023485,0.010917644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76655287,0.00032113423,0.22147685,0.000073237454,0.000048709815,0.00015830639,0.008260792,0.00064207835,0.002466023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969409,0.0015756274,0.00018802559,0.0005446281,0.0005754834,0.0001753367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767517,0.017283311,0.0009727352,0.001716054,0.0027182424,0.0005580169],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050313035,0.00091037736,0.0007059506,0.011644134,0.0008457546,0.0029931248,0.00079984847,0.0009771283,0.0037485745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025095386,0.00025421043,0.0010115625,0.0054826457,0.0005397697,0.0019883967,0.0019798903,0.0008013922,0.0011378147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001738311,0.0008268477,0.16935197,0.0016511386,0.00058981817,0.0008616867,0.0076229027,0.08870227,0.011284398,0.016782226,0.032498673,0.66808975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018760841,0.00047191433,0.095038414,0.00043137895,0.00034058368,0.0007240717,0.006240692,0.80025965,0.017231198,0.022379559,0.05649912,0.00019587547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010472703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011225772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093898975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009724049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026608407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293371014","doi":"10.54674/ess.v16i2.659","title":"Scholarly communication strategies in Latin American´s research-intensive universities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Context (archaeology); Political science; Credence; SciELO; Publishing; Convergence (economics); The Internet; Inclusion (mineral); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Economic growth; MEDLINE; Geography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.4918938278604118,"score_gpt":0.5702774535091364,"score_spread":0.07838362564872459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293371014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508069,0.0031952572,0.0011522667,0.008479672,0.000054856613,0.000081391685,0.000056176897,0.000041930984,0.13613154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502856,0.0008123559,0.00029564858,0.0003180752,0.00002727764,0.000038804556,0.000024885816,0.000005924653,0.003448493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878215,0.008535667,0.00066978857,0.00053703354,0.001112579,0.0013234459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97043186,0.01678229,0.005996335,0.0009995798,0.002637483,0.0031523518],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073901,0.00030978245,0.00047736286,0.00770134,0.006781184,0.017572107,0.0011284439,0.0021720591,0.007200895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03239746,0.00020070845,0.0002590199,0.010372986,0.0054395306,0.0056259977,0.008710079,0.0009321012,0.0006956059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028333053,0.0005145072,0.10375034,0.00053474726,0.00007592984,0.0017364328,0.5723632,0.0008208017,0.0013227336,0.17013685,0.0040352894,0.14442587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010129492,0.00013991488,0.07092754,0.00054317154,0.000056881643,0.00044908834,0.7929967,0.0013769172,0.0008601417,0.0446294,0.087840326,0.00007860439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063869497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004655289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010421888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008411741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07561642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293438325","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2022.08.002","title":"Leading International Research and Educational Collaborations – A Perspective on Successful Partnerships","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Direktoratet for internasjonalisering og kvalitetsutvikling i høgare utdanning","keywords":"Scopus; Internationalization; Expansive; Generalizability theory; Globe; International business; Political science; Web of science; Library science; China; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5722400607594209,"score_gpt":0.638129832942012,"score_spread":0.06588977218259107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293438325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025829896,0.04542885,0.015466423,0.5570778,0.003257392,0.00021818597,0.0001015126,0.00011747525,0.35250244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903918,0.03903083,0.0087765185,0.019622609,0.0024860208,0.00053676363,0.00010663134,0.000091322545,0.025431234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94113445,0.036922406,0.0021236434,0.0023299463,0.008416939,0.009072569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85235816,0.079685435,0.009918276,0.005489483,0.011519181,0.041029446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05834169,0.0009200997,0.0011552135,0.0077137877,0.018481934,0.066906214,0.0044877776,0.021743754,0.01968727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0800006,0.0009607748,0.0007893378,0.014475893,0.031166328,0.0437386,0.033869702,0.012523927,0.0026848887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015406222,0.000075196185,0.00068705,0.00015130466,0.000014620271,0.00020881237,0.0058140317,0.00016350218,0.00005365052,0.96397424,0.008931893,0.01991029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004773511,0.00008145036,0.00080238504,0.0012892702,0.000012958602,0.00027286992,0.04299113,0.00035805994,0.00013652939,0.7349563,0.21901646,0.000034822817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029598132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004112346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009846978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044021375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295292813","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.4729","title":"Recalibrating the Scope of Scholarly Publishing: A Modest Step in a Vast Decolonization Process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Political science; Indonesian; Diversity (politics); Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Social science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6357457308456576,"score_gpt":0.5771400541725193,"score_spread":0.05860567667313821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295292813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7308255,0.011395964,0.097380534,0.081910565,0.003091499,0.0025307462,0.0014465238,0.002238234,0.06918039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89474636,0.0031003188,0.06254684,0.013207221,0.0017075529,0.0013987592,0.0010993886,0.0018231414,0.020370381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93139344,0.026102794,0.0078541245,0.008824757,0.021449612,0.004375372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68154824,0.1271379,0.046753146,0.07087601,0.06867079,0.005013972],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.088550024,0.000948596,0.00188072,0.014649889,0.006137542,0.012543296,0.0036278958,0.0015624841,0.0035941317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21912415,0.00084370567,0.0013182937,0.016653081,0.013443456,0.010948868,0.013495934,0.004245365,0.0021746608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005476514,0.00029679225,0.11038453,0.0026163105,0.00039586794,0.00065796083,0.092955016,0.0015400434,0.014228619,0.0976026,0.031025212,0.6477494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001160183,0.0007108412,0.18826151,0.003134967,0.00040370165,0.001306331,0.07187292,0.0048750965,0.01951796,0.060404383,0.6490008,0.00039546282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008469399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012852762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069084004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012244879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4683029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295828382","doi":"10.16995/dscn.8090","title":"Neither Computer Science, nor Information Studies, nor Humanities Enough: What Is the Status of a Digital Humanities Conference Paper?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Studies / Le champ numérique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Library science; Discipline; Political science; Art; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4185581352450671,"score_gpt":0.4570787733583697,"score_spread":0.03852063811330264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295828382","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04637766,0.064766556,0.02100699,0.4350601,0.049542915,0.0003083992,0.00072777004,0.0006436691,0.3815659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76139617,0.049186762,0.018540876,0.027135301,0.02701548,0.0008787639,0.00077884755,0.0016462057,0.11342162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89747036,0.056479122,0.0090863835,0.00774852,0.025195848,0.0040197535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6685659,0.16002494,0.032365147,0.028452376,0.07958172,0.03100987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08352103,0.00046589138,0.001196709,0.008922433,0.015533889,0.08295981,0.0036544497,0.0058318465,0.016765254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3151565,0.0006319538,0.0006570736,0.017107248,0.021923814,0.037905153,0.012305282,0.008705363,0.0067833527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020441154,0.00008202019,0.006797628,0.002843029,0.000092700095,0.000412436,0.11649842,0.0003189851,0.001646594,0.47152913,0.11951985,0.28005478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001866627,0.000071558534,0.0038746342,0.0021605005,0.000030416613,0.0002300748,0.069845214,0.00014469151,0.00086555583,0.042155422,0.88049084,0.0001124038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004856424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004701187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98446614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012618043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026334886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44170672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296539606","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8381","title":"Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Athabasca University; Harvard University","keywords":"Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.8871000252645174,"score_gpt":0.7233945560857794,"score_spread":0.16370546917873796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296539606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026422594,0.99736917,0.00018425321,0.00084522227,0.00021010573,0.000038711398,0.00005757331,0.0000065395798,0.0010241587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015602949,0.9975338,0.00034746953,0.0002097766,0.000121371864,0.000036839083,0.000052780222,0.0000025316751,0.00013510279],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362105,0.0014383723,0.0017725754,0.0005410625,0.0023773012,0.00024965813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650738,0.024130514,0.0033458746,0.00054506364,0.006218126,0.0006865678],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008450848,0.0011102082,0.0030610687,0.028042043,0.001703038,0.0047906227,0.0020396207,0.002717976,0.0066173268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028163219,0.00095546106,0.0017316896,0.04097245,0.0019428346,0.006878678,0.0022340796,0.0018633326,0.0015451867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072994684,0.000110057656,0.0009629793,0.2049,0.000294515,0.00042584995,0.0007678835,0.00032029205,0.0003196369,0.0060119857,0.026411034,0.75940275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027866598,0.00012912534,0.004900753,0.36143315,0.0011890724,0.0018987427,0.0018747078,0.00022376722,0.00039432166,0.0048760283,0.6229843,0.00006815272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053723413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010860121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035504168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017760107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044692934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613330","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2022.07.003","title":"Extra credit for disruption: trend of disruption in radiology academic journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Statistics; Citation impact; Relation (database); Impact factor; Actuarial science; Library science; Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7701364793812381,"score_gpt":0.6740212663400368,"score_spread":0.0961152130412013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94985795,0.0048398967,0.00097153714,0.008391488,0.00039931893,0.00004416937,0.020109484,0.0005175146,0.01486851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879409,0.0008825765,0.00044178468,0.00038068587,0.00056931056,0.000017309283,0.005886987,0.000068546295,0.003811896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98947865,0.0012224634,0.0021349725,0.0013499586,0.004396495,0.0014173753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83472955,0.020707576,0.092449054,0.006537929,0.0279205,0.017655358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003510791,0.00040409935,0.0006314195,0.01511509,0.0010286566,0.0054904986,0.0016109508,0.0018592762,0.009676648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071309336,0.0003184926,0.0009853551,0.023748579,0.0011474474,0.0038967838,0.0038595467,0.0019897486,0.0035170075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029139232,0.000046723093,0.9702066,0.00016423238,0.00014125067,0.00019520885,0.00074714184,0.0002882379,0.0004709289,0.0007245606,0.007663724,0.01906008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057576603,0.000068969646,0.990765,0.000037852522,0.000027855629,0.00046287166,0.0015467213,0.00024965373,0.00016701539,0.00039574844,0.0062561054,0.000016421849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008145366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007209945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018425584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028902723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03237158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298394588","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7","title":"Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Hyperlink; Recall; Information retrieval; Precision and recall; Data science; World Wide Web; Web page; Psychology","score_opus":0.7616169543367562,"score_gpt":0.6597713076679573,"score_spread":0.10184564666879892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298394588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969305,0.008396987,0.050741274,0.0015023965,0.0006599506,0.0015886527,0.013850669,0.002327451,0.024002185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88960123,0.0016416495,0.08885735,0.00064128224,0.00050234597,0.001286035,0.013888953,0.0004421142,0.0031389976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9002556,0.039125264,0.01882472,0.011080769,0.029401725,0.0013119299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45667374,0.3844621,0.05593044,0.034457676,0.06669451,0.0017815167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11862915,0.001036808,0.001800332,0.03740576,0.0015233938,0.0061341138,0.002243092,0.0022448718,0.001303348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32151672,0.00072358036,0.002074314,0.019180033,0.0017980285,0.005945188,0.0043352647,0.0010918321,0.0015714002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014054362,0.00043290292,0.7375831,0.004032589,0.0029510239,0.00052544713,0.013828719,0.0024795774,0.0059833857,0.002245238,0.01337837,0.21515425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021799398,0.0010657652,0.84247047,0.0020490037,0.003199127,0.0024648642,0.010602639,0.038212214,0.027288571,0.0050080335,0.06680412,0.0006172983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032932519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003969311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013046482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009602467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6273784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299121301","doi":"10.1017/s0269889708002044","title":"Journals under Threat: A Joint Response from History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Editors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science in Context","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Rendering (computer graphics); Meaning (existential); Field (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Joint (building); Data science; Engineering ethics; Work (physics); History of science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; History; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Architectural engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.5139643010748699,"score_gpt":0.5557706272441338,"score_spread":0.04180632616926394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299121301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073571876,0.0055614067,0.00011859837,0.9228783,0.06869465,0.000016935657,0.00004987631,0.0000467852,0.0018977261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009483739,0.008990309,0.0005281119,0.80802673,0.16234814,0.00007869546,0.000074371055,0.00014064656,0.010329191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96376836,0.007874124,0.003890386,0.003258639,0.0180719,0.0031365396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7961497,0.10443815,0.0147116175,0.005428574,0.03955067,0.039721336],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039670154,0.0017254658,0.0028039815,0.0053215967,0.014056086,0.02859201,0.0043836767,0.041742444,0.011780285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14129674,0.001251821,0.0021059918,0.006436654,0.008212431,0.016586028,0.011158379,0.037743554,0.0043932144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004821648,0.000036763606,0.00075795915,0.00028434937,0.0000367044,0.0005963406,0.0019424073,0.000041460215,0.00016641818,0.00237119,0.9800938,0.013624491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032455606,0.00003493996,0.0013749247,0.0004974917,0.00002663314,0.00040911546,0.0030508123,0.000075233824,0.00008309609,0.0017353605,0.99262273,0.000057305057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003175353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005994519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072247083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019126188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20979834},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4299531191","doi":"10.29173/istl1641","title":"A Triangulation Method to Dismantling a Disciplinary \"Big Deal\".","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Citation; Discipline; Computer science; Multidisciplinary approach; Process (computing); Data science; Collection development; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6532942975664449,"score_gpt":0.6049524094968264,"score_spread":0.04834188806961848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299531191","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008132035,0.0020640423,0.94531757,0.008797552,0.0020798272,0.007763801,0.00086897146,0.00044260884,0.024533609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05449909,0.00094649376,0.9171883,0.0029513221,0.00022127549,0.017436024,0.00043846387,0.00025185116,0.006067145],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6799856,0.28308567,0.009470597,0.008412069,0.017744184,0.0013018316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76384884,0.1659028,0.009994878,0.028023884,0.030563407,0.0016662254],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1568272,0.0013151485,0.0015594994,0.012597767,0.009217049,0.00635166,0.0036688505,0.0029866942,0.011092013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29781124,0.0014110444,0.0022143535,0.01369626,0.010230784,0.006810792,0.01140788,0.0052858624,0.0023336557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034740003,0.00013175486,0.0070073116,0.0046672104,0.0008300792,0.0006317337,0.125067,0.0017862178,0.0021301054,0.34995443,0.071671434,0.43577537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003737203,0.00032609495,0.007405388,0.0068226806,0.00053035154,0.001035207,0.08639331,0.0106448755,0.0026882202,0.48986095,0.39351663,0.0004026303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008977551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021895267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99364835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056793652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014340138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8293914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299827348","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4599377","title":"Portage : Soutenir l'innovation canadienne par le partage d'expertise et la gestion des données de recherche","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; Compute Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Arizona Biomedical Research Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8083091375217816,"score_gpt":0.5080129369751235,"score_spread":0.30029620054665807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299827348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04552219,0.055284675,0.028605947,0.38989547,0.0036577026,0.0009576511,0.004735202,0.0019128955,0.4694282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38645616,0.05643879,0.0506845,0.01999725,0.002134868,0.00086334144,0.0047803223,0.0012782873,0.4773665],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599084,0.010792076,0.0012031441,0.0027782794,0.020699484,0.0046185865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281134,0.02343822,0.004050874,0.008620725,0.025221463,0.01055542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042624183,0.0011330297,0.0014477355,0.010402108,0.0092611415,0.026304018,0.0025460348,0.0070344014,0.029308377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06811251,0.00074723247,0.0014652543,0.018860472,0.007338316,0.016510498,0.01210461,0.00542258,0.0077159265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005151907,0.0002795826,0.0125111025,0.0016439937,0.0001839853,0.0007169153,0.016005203,0.0011189588,0.0031606636,0.29460362,0.23093078,0.43833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067012144,0.000101491205,0.015597295,0.0012546919,0.00010401478,0.00032696463,0.0054022204,0.00080270955,0.003660207,0.041350383,0.9311973,0.00013576957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38589334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47393662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034996744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13307251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7672944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300077040","doi":"","title":"Editorial ~ Open Access in Action!","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.8683670175834487,"score_gpt":0.7683886591587825,"score_spread":0.09997835842466618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300077040","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036126017,0.00093960675,0.00009831455,0.022975292,0.97444975,0.000033937707,0.000060881062,0.00008975715,0.0013164193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00067404145,0.0020410076,0.00017839995,0.025144478,0.9587699,0.00005813602,0.000072191404,0.00007205405,0.012989715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884354,0.0017140756,0.0016129899,0.0014778242,0.0056679407,0.0010918576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9514965,0.021449644,0.0026817103,0.0026172812,0.014968889,0.0067859376],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014294122,0.00418032,0.0031920762,0.004875642,0.0065122303,0.014880024,0.0054080207,0.017520634,0.044431202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05069474,0.0012893903,0.0033755037,0.0022598903,0.0056224405,0.006376588,0.0029641844,0.024104666,0.027280977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053704713,0.000025944455,0.000035387173,0.00030383977,0.000017152177,0.00015400759,0.000026651483,0.000019205261,0.000079501326,0.00059748924,0.99321634,0.0054707048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032774984,0.000035393146,0.00026779785,0.000266484,0.00002392647,0.00016948968,0.000073058756,0.00009550675,0.0001400821,0.0007777346,0.9980981,0.00001965109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021266788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003886551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99459195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045191147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043829815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14863718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300961310","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kcqem","title":"Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Grey literature; Science policy; Experiential knowledge; Gray (unit); Systematic review; Political science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Computer science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Economics; Engineering; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.7368827277211017,"score_gpt":0.6745924479329825,"score_spread":0.062290279788119296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300961310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008537771,0.43474433,0.021306489,0.49306288,0.011404784,0.0005479342,0.00037121453,0.00028639546,0.02973825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3736144,0.27734706,0.07332127,0.23756154,0.021632437,0.004681973,0.000760534,0.0015759068,0.009504913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5598879,0.29924127,0.04895544,0.018957784,0.064925246,0.008032277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1275345,0.73213303,0.031423915,0.037557352,0.06516384,0.006187419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35433188,0.0014249275,0.004242421,0.039342027,0.007586441,0.040695652,0.0056715026,0.014468853,0.0050343126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6186774,0.0016604648,0.0034098723,0.03144153,0.031328004,0.049998466,0.021637661,0.012312928,0.0013195839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028429469,0.00009054822,0.0033048075,0.033397414,0.00065097114,0.001869932,0.08468355,0.0008449429,0.0008109615,0.4906889,0.11843267,0.26494098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006887505,0.00007773257,0.0017740695,0.06393439,0.0002613386,0.00082340924,0.028674183,0.00051950436,0.00050368183,0.18686557,0.7163377,0.00015958877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057683955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009357932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96065795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025551828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05908301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79622376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301494992","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.7300","title":"Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric\\n community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bookmarking; Social media; Citation; Tracking (education); Scopus; Download; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Online community; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.66106799496116,"score_gpt":0.40475966634702015,"score_spread":0.2563083286141398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301494992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90612763,0.005538029,0.0054201363,0.005664871,0.00015485781,0.00012272666,0.0031456836,0.00044531922,0.07338079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98709726,0.0022447165,0.004280672,0.00034117312,0.0003193324,0.00007594813,0.0018511646,0.00012764754,0.003662048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660067,0.010653998,0.003631369,0.0028519528,0.015789617,0.0010663206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7461946,0.13320808,0.059066616,0.018142253,0.0360981,0.00729041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030522196,0.00029337817,0.0007155614,0.047307443,0.001812928,0.008856744,0.0015022835,0.00080313213,0.0047250427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14177412,0.00036868645,0.00044723827,0.04985392,0.0019158999,0.00754432,0.006686587,0.00065722724,0.0011646294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021822785,0.00012148874,0.6096105,0.0015132854,0.0002486416,0.00035336934,0.056970477,0.00034250924,0.0034442923,0.011816124,0.008202449,0.30715865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003882296,0.00019156463,0.8080999,0.0017363583,0.00015064729,0.0011375153,0.036010277,0.0030846193,0.0032210946,0.006058062,0.14009663,0.00017454271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043428955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00693296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96947783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002147036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002487516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16141874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302027384","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2108920/v1","title":"Techniques predatory journals use to solicit manuscripts: a contrast between Africa (lower- income countries) and Canada (high income country)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; MicroResearch","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.43964109730457085,"score_gpt":0.5436568410953451,"score_spread":0.10401574379077422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302027384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98114556,0.003210972,0.000587121,0.0036975215,0.00007795905,0.000493005,0.0002959253,0.00004032896,0.010451527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938797,0.0024069187,0.0012163495,0.0011511586,0.000038407023,0.00016124104,0.00009639884,0.000027387081,0.0010224595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781195,0.007924194,0.0028560178,0.0015423951,0.006852014,0.0027058262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8445717,0.059523422,0.049085442,0.0053194477,0.02406252,0.017437482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014933296,0.00029879963,0.00050183944,0.004489753,0.0065225028,0.007840258,0.0016334684,0.0010992488,0.0028234585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14297862,0.00041272785,0.00025471166,0.0068931263,0.0052360147,0.002174065,0.0038223877,0.000897737,0.0004109686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004783841,0.00020931187,0.65981865,0.0016016245,0.00007772019,0.0018677161,0.24932945,0.00009314024,0.0017214692,0.002079219,0.0042053685,0.07851792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007564516,0.00031005405,0.6778191,0.0018067821,0.00009325727,0.0031743492,0.27791053,0.00025671753,0.001152397,0.00053806475,0.036734495,0.00012858279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42900503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5887715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012262268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043571576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8530159},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4302779981","doi":"10.1177/014107680609900928","title":"Open access: The evidence and the verdict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6120814298794245,"score_gpt":0.6113124180490181,"score_spread":0.0007690118304063409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302779981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010207656,0.04378113,0.0042114356,0.8841918,0.010344437,0.000056863726,0.0005772735,0.000038076367,0.046591364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58401066,0.032438736,0.0063701677,0.3345718,0.032789007,0.0002699181,0.00051322475,0.0001255535,0.008910832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89089733,0.046438374,0.012214153,0.011770581,0.03386436,0.0048152213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29392025,0.62465954,0.02530658,0.022925729,0.025449155,0.007738758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.118888,0.0008244566,0.0028252904,0.006847419,0.0049943067,0.014577351,0.0063289604,0.039280538,0.016509306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52201915,0.0010289444,0.0018368451,0.006006445,0.039708365,0.025798993,0.008460682,0.02826906,0.0024963527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012118099,0.000109876266,0.0066575166,0.0025718699,0.000869563,0.0013847015,0.0019820014,0.00039140746,0.00018197799,0.7765921,0.14581382,0.06223338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004174296,0.00007974095,0.003937337,0.006236614,0.00059331994,0.00072536006,0.001578171,0.0007696399,0.00059484714,0.8582808,0.12664594,0.00014092731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046712887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053654714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99367106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005665466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093255015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62874734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304145111","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04537-w","title":"Global impact or national accessibility? A paradox in China’s science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Visibility; International community; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Regional science; Sociology; Library science; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6015316297703749,"score_gpt":0.6593529174440662,"score_spread":0.057821287673691324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304145111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557665,0.008504869,0.0019686022,0.02543378,0.00018479634,0.000018399154,0.00045553225,0.00006270355,0.10760491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851483,0.0005128475,0.00008836821,0.000206102,0.00006230812,0.0000032706077,0.000035914727,0.000003577827,0.00057289144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845016,0.00030698456,0.00010227808,0.00024343861,0.00059338904,0.0003038111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100447,0.0038188333,0.001215807,0.0006178591,0.0020337938,0.0013091235],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033869282,0.00018102482,0.00081606786,0.005939346,0.0018610442,0.0049251644,0.0006643419,0.000930383,0.0059107947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658761,0.00013657442,0.000326409,0.010082017,0.0038015712,0.0069902977,0.002835195,0.0011730454,0.0002539987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036246056,0.00020812363,0.24195276,0.00081139314,0.0002484983,0.0010404028,0.010689829,0.0038029328,0.0011271334,0.5694513,0.012459286,0.15784596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011979177,0.00019043236,0.54724413,0.00036348865,0.0002789235,0.00042230112,0.013962787,0.0072049177,0.0010873687,0.36940184,0.059604917,0.00011920942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02398084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025196455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99406064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046815025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038742628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047682464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304890705","doi":"10.1002/smj.3460","title":"Going beyond optimal distinctiveness: Strategic positioning for gaining an audience composition premium","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Composition (language); Position (finance); Business; Marketing; Earnings; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.5048594730900926,"score_gpt":0.5291731972689193,"score_spread":0.024313724178826712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304890705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143837,0.0006594954,0.025959663,0.0049129687,0.000050182985,0.00008916392,0.000077696764,0.00016912467,0.053698014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973884,0.000039440944,0.002091109,0.000112318434,0.000013866519,0.0000084733365,0.000010836148,0.0000071835575,0.0003282524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960129,0.0017876421,0.00021490558,0.0006585544,0.00083850883,0.00048743465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96851456,0.01671882,0.0057560788,0.0034282159,0.0021913813,0.0033909846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005615607,0.0003356452,0.00041277512,0.0010248017,0.0012744975,0.004837968,0.0005500781,0.0011880209,0.0065540923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034148674,0.00029287286,0.0003393521,0.00069938216,0.0018301569,0.0038215688,0.0028151297,0.0016154774,0.0005899244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005412981,0.0007237025,0.55120826,0.0006361049,0.0002760631,0.0006972135,0.015772445,0.0052797827,0.030508935,0.07677117,0.005343537,0.31224152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010362988,0.00076392613,0.79430574,0.00028648254,0.00024814584,0.0005458977,0.01773124,0.022042457,0.008246344,0.13678876,0.0187928,0.00014469621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014130124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025366552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065540923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015760221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012503952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02969855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306253448","doi":"10.1002/pra2.641","title":"Investigating Open Access Publishing Practices of Early and <scp>Mid‐Career</scp> Researchers in Humanities and Social Sciences Disciplines","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Audience measurement; Descriptive statistics; Library science; Scholarly communication; Open peer review; Citation; Psychology; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Plant biology; Business","score_opus":0.6736601966620449,"score_gpt":0.5621824102859028,"score_spread":0.11147778637614214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306253448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99172956,0.0014286385,0.0003993884,0.0016110158,0.000031610907,0.000049498278,0.0001605103,0.000018307763,0.0045714467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644345,0.0011590233,0.00058155897,0.0001787771,0.00002529167,0.000026892565,0.000084254374,0.000006511608,0.0014941689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554975,0.0047276253,0.0017076802,0.00091930496,0.005732135,0.0013634758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7988784,0.085319065,0.04448499,0.0074199266,0.038749572,0.025148084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021376228,0.00013380975,0.0004197479,0.0055297213,0.004298306,0.006616555,0.0013365536,0.0007720359,0.003017503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08737719,0.00026021944,0.0002696786,0.0087638395,0.002309161,0.0034165713,0.003288797,0.00074530276,0.0004859408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001879745,0.0002438745,0.73469937,0.00064683415,0.000057696358,0.00070354814,0.1399308,0.00010449324,0.0024134,0.0021106373,0.002053112,0.116848156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020141737,0.000289311,0.75256115,0.00045205778,0.00004004765,0.00083854824,0.21915391,0.00042227347,0.001443782,0.0010529493,0.023656018,0.00006978262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07282599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12192014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061733583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02130706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14480418},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4306906643","doi":"10.21900/j.alise.2022.996","title":"Assessing Open Access Scholarly Communication Practices of Early and Mid-Career Researchers in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Equity (law); Gender equity; Scientific communication; Public relations; Access to information; Scientific publishing; Time lag; Open access publishing; Open science; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Business; Computer science; Social science; Information access; Lag","score_opus":0.8272101727848972,"score_gpt":0.6164463562800755,"score_spread":0.21076381650482168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306906643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98051995,0.0025089972,0.00033628521,0.0070689353,0.0000483787,0.00013898486,0.0010260497,0.000027785525,0.008324568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906012,0.002670317,0.0009461526,0.0006582832,0.00001836989,0.0000701185,0.00035764306,0.000015622365,0.004662219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855343,0.0019972355,0.0011801312,0.0011883725,0.0071170754,0.0029827938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8861588,0.022718353,0.014970774,0.0016740954,0.058045845,0.016432153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011671906,0.00031445114,0.0008383867,0.0075063314,0.014994304,0.008650665,0.002213991,0.0012517661,0.00295587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052312024,0.0005158451,0.00037779257,0.01538585,0.003896092,0.0024427036,0.005115542,0.0015494425,0.00041666403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042656757,0.00022930092,0.4987961,0.00072337,0.00008241924,0.0008313905,0.36771166,0.00025923288,0.001698714,0.0043882476,0.0069308914,0.117922135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039657338,0.00016186282,0.48778576,0.0007535476,0.00006677866,0.0002707323,0.47553504,0.0007669724,0.0010774303,0.00083842967,0.032500885,0.00020283197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98965734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11950911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28741276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86710334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306993085","doi":"10.1002/asi.24717","title":"Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011–2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Listing (finance); Subject (documents); Library science; Computer science; Business; Political science; Advertising; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.4447264701377277,"score_gpt":0.5309513708115245,"score_spread":0.08622490067379684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306993085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464415,0.004669879,0.0013012011,0.008148065,0.0003310638,0.000038062964,0.017415142,0.00019661637,0.021458492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817707,0.0015321648,0.0004904075,0.0005332062,0.00035595457,0.000032924858,0.009973282,0.00005698016,0.005254423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968939,0.00036925846,0.00042761935,0.00042804467,0.0014158267,0.0004653654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655961,0.0073227,0.01489005,0.0008535486,0.00939168,0.0019459616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029240672,0.000221496,0.00029753635,0.0054627373,0.00034882082,0.004144297,0.0006776584,0.000878841,0.005545263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028706482,0.0001540587,0.0005399514,0.010164197,0.00039675916,0.0038262752,0.00097234664,0.0011484277,0.002733494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052520586,0.00020067993,0.83378845,0.00039867897,0.00016377159,0.0004039833,0.0011041946,0.0019739957,0.00077836553,0.008232912,0.031567924,0.12086176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010375107,0.000084639716,0.9645819,0.00009027551,0.000026150614,0.00045958278,0.0012997529,0.0020869072,0.00067584007,0.00087270484,0.029776167,0.00003585163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008652984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060203876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99932235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001978953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011624381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018550754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307133281","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/yjp3k","title":"Typos, Misspellings and Other Accidents: Metadata Accuracy as a Measure of Publisher Quality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Legitimacy; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Normative; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8077962310092358,"score_gpt":0.6496314343089904,"score_spread":0.1581647967002454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307133281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681942,0.0075725378,0.0764013,0.0071656904,0.00093691575,0.0006480734,0.006367118,0.0004464454,0.032267693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97379726,0.0011153916,0.017566351,0.00094947946,0.0006096206,0.0003688764,0.0030814153,0.00022275645,0.0022888903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8909239,0.039570246,0.021584442,0.011986489,0.033652965,0.0022819166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26328593,0.5101736,0.13617045,0.06331153,0.02457856,0.0024798985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065214336,0.00064381474,0.0013766368,0.022577723,0.0037165845,0.008812359,0.0019075777,0.0021622437,0.0042760377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38544106,0.0006521325,0.001149641,0.034813784,0.0074680056,0.012777249,0.0058242073,0.0022428678,0.0010349798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057626166,0.00012082418,0.8331327,0.0015303403,0.0005456932,0.0006853524,0.023020267,0.0019468624,0.00091406464,0.03850668,0.009699927,0.08932115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001119689,0.0003148259,0.60050386,0.004043856,0.00083574967,0.0032338325,0.04446435,0.014384,0.010656259,0.22461653,0.09636878,0.00046591103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029185184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003191823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026814344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024943124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34489048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307170568","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.011","title":"Recommendations for making editorial boards diverse and inclusive","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Equity (law); Key (lock); Political science; Ecology; Public relations; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.4006596374313827,"score_gpt":0.5721685505213855,"score_spread":0.17150891309000277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307170568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006866748,0.0021562595,0.0043728617,0.72905165,0.24408615,0.0011367106,0.00051156216,0.0012586776,0.016739419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012293415,0.004948797,0.0661035,0.6112179,0.17657009,0.005972606,0.001439155,0.0014369155,0.1200177],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.73794204,0.08315056,0.05577107,0.010743353,0.09039091,0.022002002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16228513,0.16151497,0.054218285,0.028387718,0.49599567,0.09759819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2360796,0.0031282888,0.0035031887,0.01768085,0.014578714,0.049188618,0.009044779,0.056539908,0.077288605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63001704,0.0038793779,0.0045944983,0.0146867875,0.008812829,0.026022654,0.00907878,0.03653401,0.067438476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006639086,0.000092768874,0.00038451355,0.00046189263,0.000035311772,0.00007722192,0.00023008259,0.00009542758,0.0002518953,0.0019514003,0.97213924,0.024213895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043561458,0.00008325045,0.002079094,0.0025795223,0.00018176444,0.0001609705,0.0022955504,0.0005247374,0.00054388645,0.015091712,0.97583574,0.0001881121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00563809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01817883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7639204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009986832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06623005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94204986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308502319","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11309","title":"Research performance of the GCC countries: A comparative analysis of quantity and quality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University; United Arab Emirates University","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Scopus; Productivity; Citation impact; Population; Bibliometrics; Citation; Human capital; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Business; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Demography; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8123891935899495,"score_gpt":0.6612881790043565,"score_spread":0.151101014585593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308502319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.912669,0.03726991,0.0013774022,0.002085267,0.00017576103,0.00012304843,0.019072441,0.00019678108,0.02703032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776422,0.0119186,0.0018543107,0.00018024957,0.00016445188,0.00008635596,0.007101805,0.00006223398,0.0009898102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932776,0.0013172235,0.0021109008,0.0005589157,0.0022654328,0.0004699445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95180666,0.011750019,0.017021822,0.0020202473,0.01554229,0.0018589441],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007182262,0.000594082,0.00083622854,0.03517464,0.00079272,0.0052265353,0.00043942596,0.00056404056,0.0020398195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037483934,0.00020270959,0.00084008125,0.059420813,0.0011187643,0.0023385533,0.0021553002,0.00026089663,0.0005497083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036999583,0.00003560209,0.9022269,0.0031483376,0.0014754146,0.0007372182,0.0039193896,0.0021677646,0.00081201957,0.004502102,0.0038183979,0.07678694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018473695,0.00009577718,0.9763737,0.0010506699,0.0003801904,0.00041927633,0.0039948975,0.0006611891,0.0005333226,0.000982019,0.015453181,0.000037406935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020192081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013383358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96482533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026934273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002938498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040149093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308568388","doi":"10.17159/2411-9717/1741/2022","title":"Journal impact factors - The good, the bad, and the ugly","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Scopus; Publication; Excellence; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Declaration; Citation impact; Editorial board; Public relations; Library science; Citation; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2569656732474563,"score_gpt":0.4493466976053737,"score_spread":0.19238102435791743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308568388","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032135997,0.5080951,0.046018023,0.1993943,0.029622227,0.00065074,0.0037700664,0.0015145858,0.17879894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59155065,0.26159292,0.058607493,0.024345491,0.044697016,0.0008391059,0.0024719539,0.0013430836,0.014552226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88944125,0.030281255,0.013879856,0.0035636746,0.060569398,0.002264566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64638305,0.20811902,0.0421389,0.017254978,0.06822023,0.017883848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07734295,0.0014104089,0.0031188992,0.0449137,0.0052089947,0.035457503,0.0019935567,0.0039042153,0.0054604113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28174642,0.0007566967,0.0015637461,0.044391748,0.0123303905,0.030386765,0.0075102504,0.0053248303,0.0032009187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031241783,0.00013389662,0.048578188,0.0065867743,0.00076382456,0.00025303007,0.0043696086,0.0008822669,0.0007213761,0.22594488,0.13197933,0.57947433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057689707,0.00034395527,0.06353688,0.007613213,0.00042497096,0.0016642943,0.0075310417,0.0011758363,0.00098498,0.3969628,0.51923746,0.0004668967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027861716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032577016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071530896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011016792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40903348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308881984","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009849","title":"Cancer research across Africa: a comparative bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Wellcome Trust; World Health Organization","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Stakeholder; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.866768386049011,"score_gpt":0.7615708795367876,"score_spread":0.10519750651222337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308881984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450869,0.053235903,0.0076641287,0.0038388951,0.00018781818,0.0022909802,0.051532697,0.00036984967,0.03579293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574582,0.019553907,0.01020976,0.00011978445,0.00016873155,0.0012664555,0.010505891,0.000055153916,0.0006620705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796919,0.0067093372,0.0041225427,0.0015643534,0.0071446984,0.0007672306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91541916,0.054386124,0.014412933,0.0025680012,0.012263727,0.0009501189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01957578,0.0006590406,0.0024441062,0.18875791,0.00193546,0.006770623,0.0009609213,0.00074994296,0.0044048275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09809321,0.0003824195,0.0022051686,0.25073147,0.0011532156,0.0046665906,0.0039815647,0.00046902435,0.00053200155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068985205,0.00018614138,0.6098643,0.026409375,0.0042533986,0.00090924546,0.012799191,0.0029375753,0.0011133292,0.011298637,0.0105500575,0.3189888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008620426,0.00035514403,0.903196,0.0055967034,0.00269216,0.0013219152,0.02351702,0.0051380163,0.0007299804,0.005495438,0.05174327,0.00012816854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008690195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070002414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004405052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006518237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103527844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308896630","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11481","title":"Academic dependency: the influence of the prevailing international biomedical research agenda on Argentina’s CONICET","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dependency (UML); Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; Public administration; Regional science; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.6412639197273935,"score_gpt":0.6094413638415208,"score_spread":0.03182255588587268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308896630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7728154,0.023259263,0.0032993644,0.032169968,0.00082770863,0.00030019073,0.003554623,0.00012059024,0.16365297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888875,0.0053499877,0.0013260965,0.0008889052,0.0002761658,0.00013208616,0.001002776,0.000055579785,0.0020807846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809264,0.007860735,0.0024853505,0.0023392728,0.0045659915,0.0018222585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082093,0.052134067,0.018069934,0.003953685,0.010957999,0.0066749845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02420315,0.0004106759,0.0009158576,0.010127925,0.0035772503,0.011413613,0.0008311567,0.0010684691,0.0064919805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062272396,0.0002737016,0.00029539698,0.020334529,0.0041259173,0.004238901,0.0053770905,0.0012936642,0.00047148776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013746662,0.00023935662,0.5065681,0.0068929717,0.0003461328,0.00321991,0.11058381,0.00092385605,0.0037859806,0.15592258,0.025703538,0.18443915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012894889,0.000216814,0.5814744,0.004351683,0.00027529013,0.00074194773,0.093804024,0.001162187,0.0012619704,0.01748796,0.2989924,0.00010233572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019901026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01728674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008920228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01126754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12800002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309567987","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.09.010","title":"Le parcours du JOGC vers l’obtention d’un facteur d’impact","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0916914361960037,"score_gpt":0.39702818835814946,"score_spread":0.30533675216214573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309567987","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045565204,0.006493624,0.00010528507,0.047194928,0.94536483,0.000009557254,0.00006739883,0.00003403556,0.00068481104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011731684,0.0059874426,0.0002748144,0.017444413,0.96866846,0.000035377056,0.000043407872,0.00007090525,0.0063019046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971806,0.0046115164,0.003752592,0.0024211116,0.015879773,0.0015290423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8579538,0.06982782,0.0061191753,0.0031179944,0.05482759,0.008153649],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030308118,0.0045945854,0.005854607,0.010329352,0.0050873426,0.018061254,0.0056635616,0.03398499,0.011278531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14484926,0.0016927192,0.0043737795,0.0054181204,0.0065017124,0.0068052304,0.002772199,0.026296044,0.0066344817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000527077,0.000009972385,0.000047960348,0.00033180616,0.000038352726,0.00012308071,0.000041001887,0.000029969173,0.00004252318,0.00077941484,0.99312216,0.005381143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016150638,0.000032734344,0.0005307285,0.001309287,0.00014811235,0.00032627862,0.00013923543,0.00033039178,0.0002492632,0.0019818167,0.9947408,0.00004985154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021654246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0336841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012146363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015227063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16028655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309568207","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.09.009","title":"The JOGC’s Journey to an Impact Factor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Popularity; Citation; Science Citation Index; Analytics; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Library science; Index (typography); Computer science; Law; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.29070196121347364,"score_gpt":0.5044263482859506,"score_spread":0.21372438707247693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309568207","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018471159,0.004622401,0.000051374336,0.041632317,0.95316404,0.000006897693,0.000030318348,0.000026741713,0.00044739185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006012809,0.0045059565,0.00013396598,0.013845144,0.97745126,0.000020427302,0.000026380949,0.00006152285,0.0033540046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96544456,0.005316851,0.00376539,0.0022732972,0.021356605,0.0018432939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7864743,0.0650018,0.006464078,0.0048876014,0.112151995,0.025020212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03839019,0.005141852,0.007103457,0.014509223,0.0066347113,0.025778925,0.0062199063,0.027206512,0.012911232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14872868,0.0016726818,0.0038340257,0.006973015,0.007441646,0.0077878507,0.004079709,0.029570902,0.006817995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013618868,0.0000059017716,0.000022776989,0.00014860087,0.000011539658,0.00004585353,0.000019125571,0.000011894537,0.000010797645,0.000260878,0.9966036,0.0028452622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009096751,0.00002201863,0.0004544012,0.0011473956,0.0000724196,0.00023486919,0.00019230899,0.00017205108,0.00006649659,0.0021919177,0.99531305,0.00004208909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02075408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04430587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98552203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014477995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021716181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20302916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309914084","doi":"10.33211/jnhpr.27","title":"Favouring Responsible Publishing: Creating a Database of Researchers and Surveying Their Knowledge, Attitudes and Opinions towards Open Access Publishing and a New Field-Specific Journal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Natural Health Product Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine; University of Toronto; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Snowball sampling; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.9019385006049092,"score_gpt":0.701033187179452,"score_spread":0.20090531342545725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309914084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841469,0.009019012,0.013336363,0.009149668,0.0004203139,0.031860843,0.06621598,0.00082912296,0.027699674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6517144,0.017909782,0.18660955,0.0063485457,0.00070615724,0.081003435,0.044774637,0.0003573445,0.010576193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9345937,0.018395975,0.022839945,0.0058889687,0.016397739,0.0018836856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6294779,0.19292079,0.092496306,0.020782221,0.05324568,0.011077067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06191792,0.0004918156,0.0017517846,0.027905287,0.00393931,0.0098451,0.0031111017,0.0023377312,0.007199259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17376041,0.0011488397,0.0012750675,0.02697291,0.0020637822,0.010045329,0.0067644534,0.0015739931,0.0038118185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009284575,0.0010583673,0.45415363,0.02080607,0.0003518889,0.0018891051,0.114324145,0.00036104678,0.0048736157,0.0032504285,0.041997302,0.356006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005344178,0.0019547024,0.35282418,0.01758217,0.0009710521,0.0026018964,0.25259924,0.002777073,0.0046518273,0.003581233,0.35932827,0.0005940073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046370877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008381729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003275885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016660461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32745713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310004589","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7368122","title":"[STREAM.FREE]** XVII MENS SOFTBALL WORLD CUP 2022 LIVE FREE WBSC Zealand","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Free water; Free world; Free press; Engineering; Computer science; Business; Sociology; World Wide Web; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.2770753363298951,"score_gpt":0.4131874111478171,"score_spread":0.13611207481792198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310004589","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008288591,0.0005705541,0.0025991611,0.0017798184,0.0031566757,0.00040702874,0.4986175,0.05922093,0.43281958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031898022,0.00078994647,0.003031799,0.0012100014,0.0004904178,0.00038513236,0.4876381,0.025882501,0.4773822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994273,0.000050167964,0.000034701254,0.00014111826,0.00021256124,0.00013416172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787855,0.00016050927,0.00007995468,0.00035247765,0.0008522451,0.0006763561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006673047,0.0019529744,0.0015508388,0.0021413348,0.0018916351,0.007917536,0.0023728104,0.0013344715,0.8025912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037116725,0.0009073033,0.0011596605,0.004628626,0.0004155021,0.004796553,0.005037485,0.0019016963,0.84243643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002699295,0.00000651203,0.00006652146,0.00006285903,0.0000022332222,0.0000059951303,0.000013301349,0.000014189708,0.000037320428,0.00016706948,0.9922415,0.0073555275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023254352,0.000011026655,0.0006294202,0.000057580324,0.0000024665133,0.000010510887,0.000040445993,0.00012025458,0.00010871787,0.00035546714,0.9986272,0.000013728783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024025459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037178975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1974088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009099833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014846495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2815796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310005349","doi":"10.9460/foo.bar","title":"Watch Canada vs Croatia LIVE STREAM FREE Full Match FIFA World Cup 27 November 2022 At Home","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.17284132406916553,"score_gpt":0.36785867747209944,"score_spread":0.1950173534029339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310005349","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00589027,0.0006906272,0.00027498064,0.0013291232,0.0015282336,0.00012520925,0.8670048,0.003333234,0.11982346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012609286,0.0007101299,0.0010126595,0.00050185726,0.0002778144,0.00009406916,0.8761642,0.001168007,0.10746208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938726,0.0000280108,0.000021416083,0.000111933514,0.0002576707,0.00019362541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844164,0.0000664223,0.00009750549,0.00013655878,0.0006894721,0.00056838314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049061485,0.0009546116,0.00069967547,0.0036950293,0.0023643845,0.00484802,0.000916174,0.0005480319,0.1729305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019033643,0.00035367857,0.0005713045,0.0062080636,0.00034797288,0.0019904284,0.0023213297,0.0012610651,0.12538946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000624924,0.000009328036,0.0012993322,0.00005869745,0.000007955951,0.0000151504155,0.000026335625,0.000041127605,0.00007903993,0.00034867483,0.99146336,0.006588455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024919736,0.000016019803,0.020744558,0.000100890975,0.000008934204,0.000023718358,0.00035607678,0.0001623275,0.00021969067,0.0002050005,0.9781171,0.000020770449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37461618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6504779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8270695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026868493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037502043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7448714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310711299","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592","title":"Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Injustice; Public relations; Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9161172157063313,"score_gpt":0.7347011405825472,"score_spread":0.1814160751237841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310711299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012786597,0.29725298,0.007354408,0.6584542,0.019527268,0.000101973244,0.000078146084,0.00009657313,0.015855828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11540727,0.49873185,0.023000658,0.325741,0.026763977,0.000634311,0.00017383268,0.00032869008,0.009218451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80634385,0.09161822,0.023088314,0.009606713,0.066900924,0.0024419108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6697635,0.24601972,0.0158923,0.023942482,0.03851404,0.005867909],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16602847,0.00069809565,0.0021549433,0.005231012,0.005321803,0.029111087,0.0032396195,0.012399348,0.002645062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2623421,0.0012460563,0.0013194071,0.0073289233,0.042470563,0.035859793,0.012015114,0.025721688,0.0020118332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080796824,0.000031789787,0.0005394498,0.008949034,0.0002149898,0.00022046041,0.005459914,0.0002094759,0.00022687795,0.70568705,0.09853748,0.17984264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040143736,0.000057439942,0.0006178374,0.019786963,0.00010833652,0.00043630484,0.0039880085,0.00021582039,0.00023364562,0.1990599,0.775385,0.00007057105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002507062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028135907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99676037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065439628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020947468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87805295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311046123","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6","title":"Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Computer science; Geography; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.7729591827362152,"score_gpt":0.6206454994995081,"score_spread":0.15231368323670713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311046123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6718189,0.03676087,0.0042710854,0.14338058,0.0073012128,0.00031620477,0.0052576796,0.00028143835,0.13061208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749383,0.005310865,0.0016617511,0.008656539,0.00293969,0.000081688464,0.0015235916,0.00010506286,0.00478251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9251544,0.021342576,0.013920871,0.006237131,0.029440358,0.0039047427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23093642,0.45099044,0.18393011,0.052325156,0.07263839,0.00917954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07542236,0.00049718365,0.0011048918,0.014112141,0.003462114,0.010412205,0.0031371894,0.0044823037,0.010611672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49321115,0.0005008598,0.0012238625,0.025391517,0.0066745086,0.0072817113,0.004903984,0.0047527947,0.0019316843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014716256,0.00023614238,0.67179453,0.003780383,0.0026169694,0.0024141024,0.014664162,0.0006814203,0.00096364686,0.05970917,0.068454355,0.17321345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003604637,0.00041387437,0.79882777,0.004748033,0.0015151851,0.0031537726,0.016915545,0.001254749,0.0027547728,0.036149252,0.13369511,0.00021135711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005966587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006534933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025124983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052289334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39887637},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4311187241","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7425342","title":"Classifying the Directory of Open Access Journals Using the Canadian Research and Development Classification System: Analysis and recommendations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Library science; Data science; Operating system","score_opus":0.8951663670708331,"score_gpt":0.6251363025289446,"score_spread":0.2700300645418885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311187241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54618263,0.017141374,0.0730207,0.07295915,0.002273149,0.009525734,0.15388401,0.0023343011,0.1226789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6209499,0.009588318,0.2646208,0.00197156,0.0003021753,0.0030756353,0.07268711,0.0004958213,0.026308693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829705,0.003819546,0.0011293894,0.0010528904,0.009517894,0.0015098365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89190215,0.013693083,0.0027996094,0.0022833073,0.08568729,0.003634595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029042607,0.0014725323,0.0016888526,0.024268541,0.0068391636,0.008140853,0.005045263,0.0010725474,0.006051659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06834277,0.00047013888,0.0020504987,0.03812221,0.0016795573,0.0033809962,0.0022108646,0.0018124836,0.0020793413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069919054,0.0005507235,0.42867154,0.0020843442,0.00038538326,0.0001384872,0.0026463307,0.005898003,0.0010562821,0.022450576,0.13593827,0.3994809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005315391,0.00040234136,0.74571615,0.0025060726,0.0016015845,0.00019215044,0.025596472,0.08393585,0.0053879316,0.012522209,0.12098304,0.0006246492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057836317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14149556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4196338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311216358","doi":"10.1101/2022.12.12.22283368","title":"The Geographical Gap in Leading Medical Journals - a Computational Audit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Bibliometrics; Nationality; Library science; Geography; Publishing; Audit; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Demography; Medicine; Sociology; Accounting; Business; Immigration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6024181963448855,"score_gpt":0.5997689342902583,"score_spread":0.0026492620546271217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311216358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395792,0.004457702,0.011751785,0.00440871,0.00016297729,0.00038838055,0.031295348,0.00079982966,0.0071560643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96768695,0.000951811,0.013183779,0.00027964837,0.000094085975,0.00027322894,0.01694825,0.00011482439,0.00046744075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667664,0.011932171,0.007830837,0.0045370595,0.007183263,0.0017502544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7259019,0.17030752,0.05514682,0.0248373,0.020957949,0.0028485477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024699373,0.0004382256,0.0012854842,0.027066315,0.0013738124,0.007693699,0.0018405654,0.0008510886,0.002934148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18570358,0.0006858246,0.0014289165,0.06444974,0.0017543773,0.005139338,0.0069226455,0.001001857,0.001324514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028298987,0.000088002664,0.9475867,0.0009927057,0.00034799127,0.00038132712,0.0018602106,0.0039000055,0.00021605413,0.0034050904,0.007388766,0.033550203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016518029,0.00019456279,0.85689527,0.0012809953,0.00068904855,0.0018628652,0.00944178,0.059764702,0.0015317098,0.012887439,0.055168223,0.00011824826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015603475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012104964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002252445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006035759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13062435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311696862","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04601-5","title":"Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Concordia University","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type); Social network analysis; Computer science; Knowledge management; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.48391299523641157,"score_gpt":0.5021268655735966,"score_spread":0.01821387033718508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311696862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889608,0.00067843887,0.0009080074,0.00075282954,0.000028881246,0.000018082128,0.00034555237,0.0000043208256,0.008303082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989899,0.0001179752,0.00016427948,0.000030194291,0.0000106217885,0.000010024134,0.000069352514,0.000002486671,0.0006052479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975204,0.0010233053,0.00016229783,0.00036167743,0.00053417933,0.00039815812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403394,0.007895257,0.0047951187,0.00043721194,0.0012488032,0.0015895865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035687522,0.00020317362,0.00024988115,0.0024458463,0.0012535505,0.0029958098,0.00038244427,0.00045121988,0.0063858908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018905172,0.00010858024,0.000266563,0.0032055823,0.0010437503,0.00254457,0.002081438,0.0004755485,0.00059348607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015948086,0.000060664097,0.9490418,0.00009992209,0.00007796544,0.00018558487,0.021947155,0.00013685501,0.00040284466,0.005369941,0.000878011,0.021639654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008737232,0.00007893556,0.9114415,0.00020458206,0.00006718618,0.00025334454,0.074266516,0.0011596957,0.00041247683,0.004021347,0.008059425,0.00002625206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049595637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008564588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010918916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011636025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02136296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311809706","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04599-w","title":"Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Multivariate analysis; Significant difference; Health science; Statistics; Actuarial science; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; Political science; Economics; Computer science; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5549541081458416,"score_gpt":0.5712223387063445,"score_spread":0.016268230560502972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311809706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954517,0.001704985,0.00021946144,0.00066960783,0.000023365814,0.000018986872,0.002302295,0.00003299781,0.005483013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962255,0.0004939842,0.00021665552,0.000051442727,0.00008898124,0.000021339252,0.001856876,0.000011882678,0.0010334927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685466,0.0010572787,0.00047313885,0.0004939466,0.0007676521,0.00035336587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97751176,0.010712087,0.006215709,0.001291557,0.0031021128,0.0011667404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00373711,0.0001970358,0.0005412752,0.01712611,0.00054190727,0.0020328958,0.0005612356,0.00075694657,0.0035468235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020512138,0.00012796585,0.0007665224,0.018896269,0.0005370611,0.0009639072,0.0011885603,0.00036219176,0.00093633943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057152127,0.00006713672,0.9833054,0.00010937796,0.00012483685,0.000053392592,0.0011312373,0.0002089392,0.00013812816,0.0003963661,0.0012803284,0.013127527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030203198,0.00002240994,0.9979976,0.000017598673,0.000037340375,0.00006142822,0.00038605495,0.00040702237,0.00004395875,0.000080764505,0.00093905436,0.0000036846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02002721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018756058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014495972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018109513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039821327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311844276","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00228","title":"Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford Graduate School of Education","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Diversity (politics); Indonesian; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Political science; Discipline; Social science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7607194694388768,"score_gpt":0.6363862618839845,"score_spread":0.1243332075548923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311844276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7104965,0.010019179,0.08593052,0.10866161,0.00288985,0.0019325333,0.001162652,0.0021697243,0.076737404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93607324,0.0016532743,0.035893455,0.010151776,0.0011509816,0.00082770095,0.00051207887,0.0012343097,0.012503198],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9231367,0.034716237,0.007882959,0.008212504,0.021559127,0.004492474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6013582,0.17114149,0.05712403,0.08690189,0.07758004,0.005894414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11092256,0.00073007675,0.0014311227,0.0117072575,0.0055916402,0.011929717,0.0033697002,0.0014214992,0.0041352636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24686375,0.00069410534,0.0010222041,0.012751004,0.014916303,0.009960329,0.012631745,0.0042055515,0.002062453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004663254,0.00030843663,0.11804798,0.0022683134,0.0003539904,0.00056891795,0.09431422,0.0015464454,0.012166699,0.15670288,0.042032383,0.57122344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009726045,0.0006141354,0.19255063,0.0034065347,0.0003037629,0.0010132409,0.07158122,0.005051692,0.017005613,0.06681373,0.6412317,0.00033046282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069762943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009017284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98829275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073008835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01210907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5866216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312081906","doi":"10.1108/mf-07-2022-0330","title":"Mapping the intellectual structure and demystifying the research trend of cross listing: a bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial Finance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Originality; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Publication; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Social science; Citation; Qualitative research; Business; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.643601084985468,"score_gpt":0.5594661742887042,"score_spread":0.08413491069676382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312081906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89326966,0.028987162,0.023863744,0.0026778707,0.00020497317,0.0017115056,0.012837401,0.0004482988,0.03599934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533298,0.01015608,0.025388852,0.00013084078,0.00019178282,0.00090865424,0.007899175,0.00006897975,0.0019258753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882803,0.0027138297,0.0027349151,0.0010720765,0.004669082,0.00052979984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384066,0.033440836,0.012848949,0.0027927516,0.011461151,0.0010497243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014922063,0.0005833594,0.001211074,0.12573902,0.001443529,0.008096785,0.00082697556,0.00053474,0.004105445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044361863,0.00024020483,0.0011971815,0.13334225,0.0011023182,0.005568478,0.0032280872,0.00046314253,0.00064795255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002883368,0.0001471612,0.4790953,0.01411356,0.0010328703,0.0010199915,0.014003318,0.0020233844,0.0049763843,0.016528532,0.006854108,0.4599171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004221009,0.00042523406,0.8423382,0.0066797948,0.0016167655,0.0020030614,0.042704415,0.009569514,0.0061866464,0.014639057,0.07363224,0.00016288369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003351578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042480044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023532596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005038635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312814818","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv33t5ggk.68","title":"Intriguing New Model for Improved Visibility and Access to Theses and Dissertations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Purdue University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Computer science; Geography; Regional science; Meteorology","score_opus":0.6285107005024337,"score_gpt":0.5054689668631106,"score_spread":0.12304173363932314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312814818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027061768,0.0016204165,0.14000432,0.117670864,0.0009953763,0.00036533034,0.0009840261,0.0018450209,0.709453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6351746,0.0031064379,0.09083677,0.017836774,0.0017922088,0.0010651306,0.001069068,0.0012430226,0.24787605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865715,0.0046180286,0.0004690738,0.0026528668,0.0043834886,0.001305148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660502,0.01346678,0.0020827823,0.008740095,0.006182552,0.0034774882],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012818022,0.000637054,0.0007607982,0.006923822,0.005590275,0.028398681,0.003502641,0.0070025353,0.048309427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046731263,0.0009433432,0.001316734,0.008572625,0.0142523665,0.052492578,0.012228586,0.005170477,0.013412926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032489115,0.000113939095,0.0011121507,0.00005048847,0.000009783418,0.0000606682,0.0015611101,0.00031191026,0.00026966925,0.9536489,0.020394625,0.0224342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000729391,0.000088507,0.0015136666,0.00016367847,0.000025647438,0.00030818355,0.002039697,0.0045438786,0.0005428654,0.6954499,0.29518488,0.000066123815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091767255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068706134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008220199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010762751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16161108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313208965","doi":"10.4103/0973-3698.364675","title":"Disseminating Biomedical Research: Predatory Journals and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Rheumatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dissemination; Engineering","score_opus":0.6830509861330616,"score_gpt":0.6488471419017912,"score_spread":0.03420384423127043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313208965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010521329,0.05138438,0.017815227,0.84482473,0.015289936,0.00065237895,0.00014905052,0.0011105385,0.0582524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30919912,0.10286323,0.062744014,0.45940697,0.030993262,0.0018750915,0.00035398436,0.003620024,0.028944265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.45029512,0.277788,0.059124798,0.028561812,0.17458954,0.009640711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13369104,0.47679818,0.125549,0.10164887,0.11079507,0.05151787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3392059,0.0017497678,0.0030870684,0.022452323,0.0211957,0.07924645,0.007863835,0.023436248,0.012810361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6376646,0.0035650237,0.0018965672,0.023868458,0.08190123,0.062143713,0.04397908,0.031217989,0.011170291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021575924,0.0002504065,0.01928139,0.0068289055,0.0005404014,0.0024644956,0.13093431,0.00044702642,0.0020566217,0.21368237,0.3478942,0.27540413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088370194,0.0001836857,0.0053723333,0.0090161795,0.00010803795,0.0021844993,0.024366345,0.00047834436,0.0007533753,0.12787062,0.82929647,0.00028181664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051034484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042096293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97656375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0212108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06568012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8148768},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4313400493","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04627-9","title":"An artificial intelligence-based framework for data-driven categorization of computer scientists: a case study of world’s Top 10 computing departments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Cluster analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Categorization; Rand index; Data mining; Index (typography); Artificial neural network; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6906770264083343,"score_gpt":0.6059824450165449,"score_spread":0.08469458139178943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313400493","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043632884,0.00033824384,0.9362899,0.004702513,0.000085233645,0.00096255715,0.0020604408,0.0011721549,0.010756084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22314209,0.00011840476,0.77246994,0.00025279008,0.000029012348,0.0003231892,0.0019495441,0.000062597326,0.0016524893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450463,0.0024833297,0.00046502636,0.0008365056,0.0014588236,0.00025168053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910013,0.005356305,0.00058547326,0.000747511,0.0018973259,0.00041209732],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008770975,0.0005176658,0.0006014428,0.0083216755,0.0019529846,0.0065155663,0.002726101,0.0016655449,0.0032062652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01569603,0.00031091328,0.0013850454,0.0076755984,0.0016898819,0.004214345,0.0023349016,0.0013189964,0.00086019916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003542264,0.0012189319,0.04319157,0.0009659029,0.0003345136,0.0017160089,0.007455666,0.08782403,0.0111055,0.43804893,0.016624542,0.3911603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048588947,0.00012463599,0.009254722,0.00021621083,0.000090004585,0.00058299146,0.0026489163,0.7392063,0.0048345774,0.19886991,0.044027023,0.000096050266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026007444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034970917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038056471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060004466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051712155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313555477","doi":"10.5463/thesis.19","title":"Developing guidelines for research institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cordis; Women's College Research Institute; European Commission","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Normative; Political science; Public relations; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Delphi method; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.985951791901373,"score_gpt":0.8104902801135969,"score_spread":0.17546151178777614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313555477","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008302962,0.007904327,0.45966718,0.24467516,0.01196429,0.034181815,0.0020738884,0.0045103887,0.22672002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054184336,0.0057623964,0.815885,0.035724346,0.0011966106,0.030195545,0.0023920883,0.0014956349,0.053163953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5117839,0.32814473,0.07467167,0.016266314,0.05617009,0.012963322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47495103,0.21069257,0.03279373,0.051451594,0.21118578,0.018925348],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30960137,0.002229674,0.0022189578,0.012805338,0.012751502,0.03164801,0.011489754,0.025532886,0.017818728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48374856,0.0037657286,0.0033640983,0.012323354,0.015977329,0.042902246,0.023219712,0.02754442,0.024757959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006963181,0.0003104006,0.0014443444,0.0028203358,0.000051018593,0.0010218102,0.08500999,0.002025192,0.0012108575,0.5090109,0.261318,0.13570753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050651066,0.00007460421,0.00034507792,0.004716069,0.000019614441,0.00026617764,0.018093633,0.00062488817,0.0007221685,0.06222172,0.9127521,0.00011331974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012467988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98719466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022966774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099541545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8513844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313556842","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.01.005","title":"Global research on dental polymers and their application: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Saudi Dental Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University","keywords":"Scopus; Microsoft excel; Computer science; Visualization; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.524923784932063,"score_gpt":0.5861494615660215,"score_spread":0.0612256766339585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313556842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78554565,0.1026346,0.01692281,0.003795999,0.0002938426,0.0017953566,0.019523235,0.00033712844,0.0691514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244514,0.047654044,0.018925505,0.00014187461,0.0002925553,0.00076515006,0.005847305,0.000042705098,0.0018793569],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148566,0.0019864915,0.0013414446,0.00056355115,0.004271528,0.00035139144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98277825,0.010601373,0.0025959548,0.00053420535,0.003129289,0.00036095697],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508639,0.00075615715,0.0016982865,0.1285056,0.0011525396,0.005694308,0.0006250961,0.00055538944,0.0045212256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026724435,0.00022580504,0.0019188933,0.14185211,0.00083257916,0.0031904639,0.0021780417,0.00036549,0.0007170321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003680942,0.00028518293,0.31176957,0.028235598,0.0024121657,0.0008139289,0.004964199,0.0045229276,0.0022513487,0.011079044,0.007919833,0.6253781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010239846,0.00062422914,0.81627744,0.013177378,0.0052653947,0.0024576744,0.026177282,0.014587544,0.005488281,0.016560199,0.09906871,0.0002135183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040555377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041631195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8714944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026528502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005533469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313621144","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102659","title":"Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Publishing; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6199549595361636,"score_gpt":0.5971259394288214,"score_spread":0.022829020107342224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313621144","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10803444,0.02097228,0.31166556,0.304899,0.03216753,0.02042868,0.005703984,0.0033411693,0.19278733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.331804,0.0034570077,0.6126224,0.014754211,0.005458767,0.007094009,0.0020987787,0.0008174714,0.021893358],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6114186,0.09116975,0.08009487,0.011944391,0.19770281,0.00766963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13263886,0.3330748,0.035256024,0.03452446,0.45638642,0.008119429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26055992,0.0019158071,0.0030254736,0.039198652,0.011903817,0.02645902,0.019298531,0.011454351,0.008333216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.77017885,0.0021439318,0.0048823883,0.02642033,0.015185561,0.013280478,0.009165161,0.010419847,0.0024754852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013230176,0.0007325721,0.06796423,0.006062961,0.00065872783,0.00082750217,0.015917022,0.001970209,0.00296692,0.23003358,0.17326133,0.49828187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014458772,0.0015710754,0.09542805,0.020928504,0.003961967,0.0029895087,0.023146773,0.045744814,0.019115219,0.21354148,0.570155,0.0019717223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0320907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049036764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98854566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019476097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04950966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4314446218","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v45i2.14869","title":"Les défis informationnels pour les étudiants au doctorat en médecine au Burkina Faso","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19548106300463616,"score_gpt":0.42527633332794257,"score_spread":0.2297952703233064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4314446218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.774981,0.03673645,0.010843105,0.111111306,0.00064982515,0.0006735305,0.0037059798,0.0001480325,0.06115067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739541,0.010656023,0.0054496117,0.004677028,0.00017022269,0.0005485251,0.00055168296,0.000032165284,0.003960709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9290155,0.04229777,0.010485522,0.0029033364,0.011722092,0.0035757485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7410575,0.18068232,0.03643897,0.00607099,0.02980647,0.0059436983],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054319285,0.00044937647,0.00095025863,0.0064493185,0.0061046463,0.011288048,0.0011310353,0.0019686352,0.005337172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21025985,0.0006517202,0.0004937445,0.011383621,0.004009463,0.0073889135,0.00465925,0.0023186621,0.0009772996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004759636,0.00014010223,0.339242,0.006926495,0.00020838535,0.0014340149,0.42613205,0.000423479,0.002084552,0.022008568,0.011221829,0.18970256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100629746,0.00035021687,0.3320142,0.01466784,0.00031345477,0.0021671252,0.40425658,0.0009113115,0.0023870557,0.011679355,0.23088662,0.00026557187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08843039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06713182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98871195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011550792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022589538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700203","doi":"10.1111/head.14461","title":"Headache at a Janus moment: Reflecting back on the past 20 years of scholarly publishing and looking ahead to inevitable change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Origin BioMed (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Janus; Publishing; Moment (physics); History; Medicine; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.5843449614181208,"score_gpt":0.49705658934455715,"score_spread":0.0872883720735636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315700203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013731795,0.001207582,0.000026097603,0.9731548,0.024800545,0.0000021698104,0.000009548049,0.000009055909,0.00065288326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035113576,0.0025436191,0.00021121578,0.89175415,0.09892509,0.000010370727,0.000015599828,0.00002448554,0.0030041626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886545,0.0026174856,0.001746557,0.0009493928,0.0049766027,0.0010554681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342898,0.032921113,0.0047610113,0.0020513837,0.01272809,0.013248633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012158378,0.00068303186,0.0013921334,0.0014676418,0.006667627,0.010081189,0.0020853807,0.039063808,0.007428418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09625132,0.00079605833,0.0011344905,0.0021725139,0.0059833922,0.010930357,0.002364714,0.050779656,0.0057172673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029241548,0.000016958656,0.0003486089,0.00004536143,0.000010191845,0.0009608388,0.00016939461,0.000016349515,0.000060446593,0.0015318693,0.9893441,0.007466707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223222,0.000066975794,0.002043564,0.0006871674,0.000035947985,0.005896004,0.002320441,0.00031031706,0.00019555686,0.015411472,0.9728042,0.00010613712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075360597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017005695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072786026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00944706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06430042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316506829","doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1","title":"Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Publication; Gender gap; Scopus; Publishing; Impact factor; Set (abstract data type); Library science; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.4825958844803239,"score_gpt":0.5822433334994175,"score_spread":0.09964744901909356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316506829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739596,0.0041718665,0.002265812,0.0032591387,0.0001499373,0.00003228206,0.0037916743,0.000051568386,0.012318156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528885,0.0008573418,0.00056683016,0.00025485366,0.00019554213,0.000023776287,0.0012079728,0.000013937346,0.0015908217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489236,0.0016667928,0.0005571116,0.0009006159,0.0014562766,0.00052693527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8893516,0.059131943,0.040656213,0.0047417423,0.0033358536,0.0027825225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052787997,0.0002215,0.0005523504,0.0035539425,0.0009291556,0.0021622921,0.0005644038,0.0005743442,0.006836868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05552621,0.00021761995,0.00036023083,0.005826488,0.00092536415,0.0017818571,0.0014244567,0.00055996544,0.00092589424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012957564,0.00003140262,0.97114545,0.00015426794,0.00011581648,0.00017017753,0.0032990233,0.00017263881,0.00021281505,0.0021660917,0.0042202394,0.01818248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020927047,0.00004929457,0.96947855,0.00013997161,0.000075380594,0.00043749833,0.0038526906,0.0008645878,0.0005117128,0.0052438024,0.019300373,0.000025255455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00404332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005598639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061660743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007196489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027917266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316661435","doi":"10.1038/d41586-023-00028-x","title":"Self-publishing is common among academic-journal editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.3463642669259725,"score_gpt":0.5661157677873855,"score_spread":0.21975150086141298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316661435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501419,0.0071969866,0.001242395,0.008856789,0.0007058898,0.000067853456,0.0014775821,0.000219347,0.030091314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873624,0.0023221874,0.0006695711,0.001355727,0.0013534495,0.00003255627,0.0010034874,0.000055098135,0.0058456114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211943,0.0021194022,0.0012015576,0.0010095821,0.0029589438,0.00059113273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7027774,0.1543499,0.1027084,0.011805738,0.012055106,0.01630349],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007109261,0.00021939917,0.00065599795,0.006605598,0.0017038819,0.005376555,0.0009493682,0.0016278157,0.013855847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081958726,0.00028494495,0.00046487726,0.010692063,0.0009962611,0.0033763493,0.0020614483,0.0013424896,0.0019974597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044370038,0.00033501172,0.85632783,0.00073152286,0.00027124642,0.00092767645,0.007827457,0.00007220071,0.00175106,0.0026645835,0.015791664,0.11285599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006867425,0.00024439167,0.9178089,0.0003468663,0.00019224166,0.0039800303,0.011557762,0.0005948538,0.0016447152,0.0060018864,0.05749236,0.000067361645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001076791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022034487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005617611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016261681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046352446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317840362","doi":"10.1136/bmj.p152","title":"Assessing the relevance of research for clinicians","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9235373531145914,"score_gpt":0.7534069448768983,"score_spread":0.1701304082376931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317840362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015086861,0.0005201613,0.00006598943,0.99250257,0.0056910347,0.000009259432,0.000023843284,0.0000094166,0.0010267571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003984102,0.00086159736,0.0007382692,0.94240046,0.05023211,0.000060972452,0.000029689341,0.000020892347,0.0016718741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91486776,0.03265267,0.016264437,0.0045923707,0.028617915,0.0030049407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45123953,0.42368788,0.016923314,0.0095244935,0.06748276,0.031141957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061240964,0.00086965034,0.0037990185,0.0057615545,0.009284881,0.01568474,0.0037963775,0.11958197,0.010295383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44506168,0.0018785675,0.0026158951,0.0046375454,0.013189583,0.012597861,0.006227442,0.078579105,0.0114771575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009047711,0.000043050237,0.0020560336,0.00021217065,0.000061762905,0.0010927521,0.00034431435,0.0000669194,0.00014183749,0.005252659,0.97607124,0.014566847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005152433,0.00011866961,0.005750853,0.0027377275,0.00023117416,0.0039438694,0.001997663,0.0018008818,0.00050869014,0.110668436,0.8714208,0.00030601808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012080343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018735753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99423844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015185353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0226265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32387698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318256456","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.72","title":"Opening a “closed door”: A call for nuance in discussions of open science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Call to action; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Psychology; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.7030676785218101,"score_gpt":0.6271971466744402,"score_spread":0.07587053184736992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318256456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059379963,0.0036211773,0.02347101,0.9104247,0.0077077,0.00004684024,0.000036316833,0.00021630593,0.048537895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6025986,0.004646063,0.029779179,0.3280181,0.012518547,0.0006849653,0.000095029245,0.001930375,0.01972898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8435812,0.13012291,0.00458074,0.006235527,0.011255672,0.004223897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59909934,0.343839,0.00801841,0.019385744,0.012016354,0.01764124],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16682176,0.00081015757,0.0018040256,0.0037700243,0.025375962,0.037335094,0.0042590657,0.032221057,0.019483611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27925953,0.0012282126,0.0014541537,0.0029525005,0.08927969,0.080424786,0.031492542,0.044157103,0.0024108135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049481005,0.000018985009,0.00022830351,0.00013573468,0.000016329726,0.00024398761,0.08852347,0.00010176078,0.00030990256,0.8362517,0.06341668,0.010703759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041004896,0.000020684925,0.00020489567,0.0005223449,0.000009239409,0.0001316275,0.037128057,0.00030598792,0.00022098288,0.6504834,0.31085846,0.0000733543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024931415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003634897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99574095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009781584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138495555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88224834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318481538","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38458","title":"Le statut universitaire pour les bibliothécaires de l’Université Laval","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.35188711970902187,"score_gpt":0.427682355851891,"score_spread":0.07579523614286915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318481538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5707379,0.007630836,0.013724025,0.010832376,0.00019285396,0.00019748008,0.005289463,0.0005512256,0.39084387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551828,0.0012653504,0.004307832,0.0002431932,0.000040766387,0.00007997451,0.0010723098,0.00006696295,0.0377409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995626,0.0019508393,0.0004608955,0.0008521593,0.0054207756,0.0013591772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979702,0.005282278,0.0024533293,0.001284392,0.009242787,0.0020352805],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056526083,0.0003235506,0.0005370472,0.008265299,0.006146193,0.013074988,0.0010957908,0.00095267134,0.014371058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020442858,0.00029409956,0.0006710543,0.01841222,0.0027732302,0.0031098493,0.003089019,0.0012024317,0.0019204007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019339976,0.00008001472,0.28142324,0.000560524,0.00021008468,0.00023309684,0.031742547,0.0046590054,0.0014398146,0.4940168,0.01796962,0.16747181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034787055,0.0000919611,0.5986256,0.00073962443,0.00015011587,0.00024140903,0.029222462,0.0046508624,0.0018268559,0.018555911,0.34568915,0.00017128506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81011665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85003966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050594967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07117771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3820032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318483628","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v8.38458","title":"Le statut universitaire pour les bibliothécaires de l’Université Laval","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35188711970902187,"score_gpt":0.427682355851891,"score_spread":0.07579523614286915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318483628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5707379,0.007630836,0.013724025,0.010832376,0.00019285396,0.00019748008,0.005289463,0.0005512256,0.39084387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551828,0.0012653504,0.004307832,0.0002431932,0.000040766387,0.00007997451,0.0010723098,0.00006696295,0.0377409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995626,0.0019508393,0.0004608955,0.0008521593,0.0054207756,0.0013591772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979702,0.005282278,0.0024533293,0.001284392,0.009242787,0.0020352805],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056526083,0.0003235506,0.0005370472,0.008265299,0.006146193,0.013074988,0.0010957908,0.00095267134,0.014371058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020442858,0.00029409956,0.0006710543,0.01841222,0.0027732302,0.0031098493,0.003089019,0.0012024317,0.0019204007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019339976,0.00008001472,0.28142324,0.000560524,0.00021008468,0.00023309684,0.031742547,0.0046590054,0.0014398146,0.4940168,0.01796962,0.16747181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034787055,0.0000919611,0.5986256,0.00073962443,0.00015011587,0.00024140903,0.029222462,0.0046508624,0.0018268559,0.018555911,0.34568915,0.00017128506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81011665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85003966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050594967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07117771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3820032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318701103","doi":"10.3233/jpd-229011","title":"The Journal of Parkinson’s Disease Takes the Open Road","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Parkinson s Disease","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"Parkinson's Foundation","keywords":"Parkinson's disease; Disease; Medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.2988133647322714,"score_gpt":0.5266866848664992,"score_spread":0.22787332013422779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318701103","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047716352,0.002007161,0.00008304739,0.013848461,0.9795394,0.000023991366,0.00007063267,0.00008951305,0.0042901207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009659455,0.006259649,0.00026381755,0.008235765,0.94715554,0.000033681805,0.00012914314,0.00010861799,0.03684785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922752,0.0007307104,0.0007500732,0.0005563691,0.005222047,0.0004655627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595702,0.009295222,0.0013148111,0.0014611804,0.019978266,0.008380329],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00857102,0.0029571676,0.0042850715,0.0071869697,0.0034968874,0.016579077,0.0024378307,0.00996331,0.0748977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032036915,0.0013091356,0.002235147,0.003523971,0.0020923016,0.004588823,0.0020770668,0.012908302,0.058526527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027332444,0.000016148828,0.000034984707,0.00024035893,0.000013918517,0.00006368337,0.000009721687,0.000018113446,0.00003965376,0.00031364535,0.9883852,0.010837139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005160622,0.000032730506,0.00039619952,0.00035255254,0.000035454672,0.00018267767,0.000058542344,0.000080221755,0.00009287932,0.0012340237,0.99746346,0.000019758807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014584666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004009419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99756217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002778888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052670073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25055778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318707934","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/5yt4r","title":"The Growing Concentration of National Influence in Global Science and Its Impact on Future Research.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Construct (python library); Scientific field; Metadata; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Scientometrics; Scale (ratio); Quarter (Canadian coin); Data science; Regional science; Field (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Engineering; Cartography","score_opus":0.6694255633085026,"score_gpt":0.6741706629394555,"score_spread":0.004745099630952931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318707934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76256377,0.018718114,0.009852894,0.026676757,0.00044136576,0.000046883008,0.0019328874,0.00016312284,0.17960416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936215,0.002618759,0.0013243749,0.0005630719,0.00019471311,0.000021842518,0.00036547167,0.00002594801,0.0012643712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995074,0.001747391,0.00029597132,0.0007626102,0.0017308866,0.00038908623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951234,0.028210351,0.011198914,0.002653995,0.0037610491,0.0029417938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076128985,0.00025078596,0.00057153596,0.010262561,0.0018561241,0.007780054,0.00037217262,0.00090540515,0.0055700704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037232444,0.00021859819,0.00048644474,0.014996529,0.003571225,0.0066776304,0.004731768,0.0012468476,0.00070533465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016768291,0.00006658742,0.63607043,0.0008899812,0.00077451917,0.0004310158,0.0141466865,0.0031173201,0.002230582,0.14856999,0.013414263,0.18012096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023073155,0.00012713348,0.7609044,0.0006628464,0.00039424046,0.0006550756,0.015612705,0.0033892968,0.0019695375,0.12601236,0.09015332,0.000095991665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043146037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007184344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027158402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014514888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04026133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318909628","doi":"","title":"Three common sources of error in peer review and how to minimize them","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8921907250717775,"score_gpt":0.7287524652946374,"score_spread":0.1634382597771401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318909628","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052514244,0.03860307,0.5781729,0.19659418,0.017996863,0.0051547685,0.0037059635,0.007252527,0.10000554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46759602,0.01810497,0.44244555,0.026960839,0.009766489,0.005227134,0.002008779,0.003226232,0.024664033],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6051283,0.15993635,0.076459035,0.018910332,0.13483754,0.0047285114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13109034,0.5390866,0.11745438,0.07190724,0.13470271,0.005758776],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18191436,0.0013674013,0.0022584444,0.010999904,0.0052083824,0.00997573,0.0041737803,0.0062173433,0.010051676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7009623,0.0012796755,0.0024825518,0.017883051,0.0064577204,0.009133937,0.007200415,0.004999689,0.0034249998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006934823,0.00022617953,0.060979046,0.008798768,0.0012265223,0.002164631,0.009942783,0.0034836028,0.0011209311,0.08852445,0.13627821,0.68656135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004745378,0.00034586532,0.090314485,0.04498608,0.0024309072,0.012006543,0.013937981,0.03472472,0.010048397,0.41984773,0.36997214,0.00091076974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050632237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010856157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007109315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016832922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319439027","doi":"10.2196/44633","title":"Factors Associated With Open Access Publishing Costs in Oncology Journals: Cross-sectional Observational Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Elekta; University of Alabama; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Observational study; Medicine; Impact factor; Internal medicine; Family medicine; Oncology; Political science","score_opus":0.9635569213506799,"score_gpt":0.7681482277872382,"score_spread":0.1954086935634417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319439027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599105,0.0014642695,0.00012688393,0.00018107136,0.00002134009,0.000044129778,0.0014932208,0.000007831243,0.0006702367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773896,0.0007524259,0.00016860712,0.00009858778,0.000061826126,0.000048585203,0.00096648885,0.0000074051904,0.00015710006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996793,0.0006672347,0.00093692227,0.0004830529,0.0008075266,0.00031221408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95336866,0.013166125,0.027021568,0.0014496673,0.0026112595,0.002382769],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029910197,0.00028624266,0.0008330668,0.0036119544,0.0005488257,0.0017591404,0.0007859595,0.00093706144,0.0038094383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024867175,0.0005345443,0.0008436711,0.008205054,0.00050380046,0.0027939316,0.0009540001,0.0010522036,0.00072380144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010992989,0.00009464176,0.99811506,0.00009415166,0.00008678076,0.00007390598,0.00013248395,0.000027701955,0.000040043662,0.000024610825,0.00026442934,0.0009363049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022539429,0.00020371098,0.997468,0.00007873766,0.00010695982,0.00060515956,0.0007282527,0.00018674682,0.00003584968,0.00006985649,0.00048087162,0.000013282825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002361536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023107326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99921405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006537059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009730403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015818238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319603604","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.12.011","title":"Championing inclusive terminology in ecology and evolution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of California Berkeley; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Terminology; Inclusion (mineral); Harm; Discipline; Ecology; Sociology; Evolutionary ecology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Political science; Social science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.3002922736533268,"score_gpt":0.5339535607174793,"score_spread":0.23366128706415257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319603604","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060592104,0.01784815,0.08350067,0.7508785,0.015713587,0.00013468525,0.00015475528,0.00041992374,0.070757724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7530619,0.008543495,0.08719267,0.11675682,0.017259609,0.0005937502,0.00026934248,0.0008644997,0.015457794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8179747,0.09552388,0.015620679,0.010634137,0.05538862,0.0048579765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48147604,0.35379574,0.028995333,0.042845216,0.066955864,0.025931735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21191731,0.00078859687,0.002512546,0.02103436,0.013027295,0.03708158,0.0052609597,0.01211534,0.0035544136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36386,0.00082867354,0.00096628146,0.017920945,0.06733944,0.056851525,0.034435946,0.021086672,0.0013056889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048410096,0.00006083214,0.0059255264,0.00046085723,0.00010723588,0.00018758322,0.0291444,0.00029144148,0.0007094145,0.8261172,0.03441395,0.10253314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016916467,0.00001986389,0.0026057248,0.0009196001,0.000044599998,0.00029017995,0.009589615,0.00069821085,0.0006056371,0.858038,0.12710969,0.00006192793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024879621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003626584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97896564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069798236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019730022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319944791","doi":"10.1097/md.0000000000032926","title":"Top 100 most-cited articles on renal cell carcinoma: A bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Web of science; Descriptive statistics; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation analysis; Publishing; Citation database; MEDLINE; Statistics; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Scopus; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5215840460889631,"score_gpt":0.5463267918712595,"score_spread":0.024742745782296405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319944791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75761205,0.1199583,0.012182569,0.0027802174,0.00055133394,0.002518092,0.07086231,0.001105543,0.032429423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85943955,0.070370555,0.03268348,0.0002405402,0.00084796455,0.0024034837,0.030664224,0.00017606941,0.0031741057],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897121,0.001324211,0.002337269,0.0008288377,0.0053676087,0.00042994673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974684,0.013613064,0.004253667,0.00059329445,0.006076677,0.00077929173],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007076278,0.0009863179,0.0029606223,0.15142532,0.0016337445,0.005232201,0.001240789,0.00086412765,0.0055363225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0374988,0.0003542448,0.003225788,0.14180683,0.0006834102,0.0028375997,0.0022222362,0.000537113,0.0016352446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090656226,0.00044388126,0.445547,0.04728427,0.0047960714,0.0022024896,0.003545769,0.003966624,0.004931064,0.003775582,0.025671864,0.45692876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002560879,0.00065986,0.83407134,0.009921328,0.010510828,0.0064765373,0.008105193,0.01800807,0.005933232,0.01055153,0.095122844,0.00038320356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033411805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00380787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021618549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036110447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037423372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321088024","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1098319","title":"Embracing diversity during researcher evaluation in the academic scientific environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz; Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Bottleneck; Diversity (politics); Computer science; Mathematics education; Political science; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5909706161472336,"score_gpt":0.5720299002343835,"score_spread":0.01894071591285007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321088024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4057714,0.020423561,0.310312,0.09775715,0.005562106,0.012402653,0.0007203428,0.0013009962,0.14574978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.838439,0.0017263135,0.14066091,0.007519478,0.0010023188,0.0059711053,0.00032171494,0.00044892504,0.0039102333],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.32937047,0.57091165,0.021836337,0.012015559,0.059024382,0.0068416023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26507273,0.53179127,0.04008438,0.033005495,0.11369167,0.016354488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52386594,0.0014818269,0.002655108,0.011206242,0.011040034,0.031094516,0.0031020744,0.0034573164,0.0048484295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6384868,0.0010857618,0.0017396508,0.006576039,0.010052791,0.014123457,0.028114617,0.0053393748,0.0014474667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012955188,0.0004634867,0.07485471,0.0047606505,0.0009206057,0.0008092029,0.32114714,0.0012204426,0.005592402,0.03526468,0.022019316,0.5316518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006433192,0.0022904882,0.098767705,0.013653861,0.0015507933,0.0026276435,0.2356378,0.01323767,0.013303223,0.3196359,0.29770264,0.0009489777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028290057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066111665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47613406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010818657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031507365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5871581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321375960","doi":"10.3389/frma.2023.1040823","title":"Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Robert Bosch Stiftung; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Workload; Psychology; Publication; Perspective (graphical); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.9005667755092183,"score_gpt":0.6405828413056083,"score_spread":0.25998393420361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321375960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860926,0.0024419562,0.00046389241,0.002282283,0.00005842471,0.00001606289,0.00022198615,0.0000094150455,0.008413419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753237,0.0011067087,0.00028249357,0.00010552249,0.000061028004,0.000013204111,0.000050446422,0.0000076083284,0.00084064744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977598,0.0011447904,0.00018172433,0.00014075954,0.00040431236,0.00036855848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968346,0.011558384,0.00589502,0.00046188803,0.0009805782,0.0014206951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036339248,0.0002474161,0.00024366063,0.0020982088,0.0011186247,0.0020509865,0.00029141977,0.00030125817,0.004762508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018869942,0.00013092527,0.00019141306,0.0033331001,0.0009969415,0.0015519632,0.0012807333,0.00031582027,0.000539956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026232377,0.00013329188,0.89278257,0.00036213695,0.00006198767,0.0012470637,0.036742892,0.00025759512,0.0039384593,0.004618101,0.0015186878,0.058074914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029596242,0.00025205986,0.9253421,0.0004021122,0.000044474666,0.0016291563,0.04322534,0.0003674052,0.0017457264,0.0037555506,0.023166588,0.000039895927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011323856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013749688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051636924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011194545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019218266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321505149","doi":"10.1051/pmed/2022041","title":"Vers une science ouverte francophone en santé. Le champ de l’éducation médicale est aussi concerné","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pédagogie médicale","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; French; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.46024608885648244,"score_gpt":0.5621528636645791,"score_spread":0.10190677480809662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321505149","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03179412,0.041763622,0.007946625,0.65150064,0.008172579,0.00016449978,0.00052654435,0.0002441803,0.25788724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6213259,0.03655762,0.012109522,0.13847019,0.00456815,0.00032408437,0.000532013,0.00035087086,0.18576166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9589351,0.024458379,0.0016983835,0.0029805228,0.008996169,0.0029314389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92109144,0.039055184,0.005434719,0.005937308,0.018976482,0.00950484],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039134197,0.00080890866,0.0007427955,0.0038762803,0.010748434,0.021628382,0.0011463828,0.0067748833,0.021474384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04576634,0.00048750872,0.0008338793,0.004429049,0.023819495,0.016371489,0.008395545,0.009261641,0.0056044003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020883791,0.00016328265,0.006058959,0.0017006623,0.00009740982,0.0007068953,0.21748325,0.0002197837,0.0022299893,0.41648263,0.18690558,0.16774279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019176146,0.00008894672,0.004726834,0.0016089552,0.00002840805,0.00026399552,0.032053817,0.00007483503,0.00043078884,0.023410743,0.9372402,0.000053241227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07855524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07203793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023068504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05345042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20696384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611368","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00248","title":"Impact of geographic diversity on citation of collaborative research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Citation; Perspective (graphical); Geographical distance; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Scale (ratio); Data science; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.9158071959647329,"score_gpt":0.7441541280930054,"score_spread":0.17165306787172752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97379285,0.0040271054,0.0030552153,0.0023358057,0.00014454334,0.00003497796,0.0009698585,0.00006516695,0.015574525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.00022182157,0.00024892497,0.000029021998,0.00006261528,0.0000073276724,0.00011526887,0.000007112906,0.00024026113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845803,0.008256318,0.001045821,0.001459303,0.0037203033,0.0009380667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76233906,0.16839218,0.0357569,0.01196968,0.01353035,0.008011813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010901196,0.00034459127,0.00093162706,0.007311363,0.0016026961,0.0053089485,0.00081189844,0.0007053783,0.005282757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1338185,0.00011687242,0.00059944385,0.016666384,0.002440693,0.0033328466,0.0052115284,0.00089099765,0.0005947313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061132474,0.00015930015,0.8945565,0.00086374703,0.0011972947,0.00053339987,0.004189442,0.0079950495,0.0016905895,0.012090709,0.0027776437,0.07333508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006853459,0.00036972607,0.926482,0.00048529456,0.0007060573,0.0007917058,0.0086164735,0.009594767,0.0024806322,0.03812312,0.012174264,0.000107327716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032514636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029696587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99268866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016173074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015111623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05765176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611868","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04657-x","title":"Research mobility to the United States: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"China; Presidency; Political science; Politics; Cohort; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8030659521882623,"score_gpt":0.6690166332988601,"score_spread":0.1340493188894022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751057,0.0038713408,0.00054555124,0.0008761604,0.0000446682,0.000032933942,0.003958453,0.00002280084,0.0155424345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302906,0.0021432485,0.0005811572,0.000089952984,0.00006425671,0.000025155612,0.0030215017,0.000009079152,0.001036676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832946,0.00046828226,0.00021146909,0.00022727123,0.0005636858,0.00019990506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300957,0.0022948864,0.0018934933,0.0002137502,0.002158438,0.00042979902],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017768296,0.00022317749,0.00056507124,0.021461751,0.0011620091,0.002747954,0.0005104817,0.0005201914,0.0023528524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012653208,0.00010271451,0.0007186962,0.045890424,0.00047216192,0.002340207,0.0020918886,0.00043973225,0.00043379294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012723127,0.00009015176,0.9493944,0.00021319914,0.00043769658,0.00021208439,0.0016022449,0.001563678,0.00025254217,0.0031454747,0.0047564874,0.03820482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001142636,0.00008186329,0.9740105,0.00017280929,0.00037477832,0.00022538926,0.0062512998,0.0031484722,0.00026897236,0.00078767445,0.014650395,0.000016276492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06479662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07043247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001803786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022210851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12883896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356342","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00250","title":"An open data set of scholars on Twitter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Event (particle physics); Set (abstract data type); Open data; Matching (statistics); Open science; World Wide Web; Data set; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9676859895836807,"score_gpt":0.7752727570725012,"score_spread":0.19241323251117948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874329,0.00045155594,0.009526263,0.0011018598,0.00027188778,0.0015642092,0.2702712,0.000556376,0.028823772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66945213,0.00045510058,0.027024213,0.00028902997,0.00026818563,0.0034187748,0.28735077,0.000106893574,0.011634863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965397,0.0007125914,0.00065147877,0.0004751407,0.0013572525,0.00026384433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780036,0.0043735304,0.0017744551,0.0020923868,0.0032007734,0.00075841707],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021351278,0.00034634472,0.00051205605,0.010276461,0.001535532,0.001955655,0.0008962345,0.0011905114,0.0061502135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01495318,0.00014470899,0.00033818732,0.014702383,0.0006213839,0.0013640539,0.0021939457,0.00046428296,0.003575157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020655931,0.0016636855,0.5012554,0.0021670095,0.00022223001,0.0041629067,0.011431776,0.0087869335,0.015175332,0.026431441,0.12147872,0.30515897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027437648,0.0005743011,0.3866897,0.0005534151,0.0001772874,0.002023381,0.020628883,0.028238203,0.025591522,0.01327034,0.5217655,0.00021302902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006638138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010426546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016372981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02057451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772344","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0053","title":"<i>Demystifying Scholarly Metrics: A Practical Guide</i> by Marc W. Vinyard and Jaimie Beth Colvin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.5346945761361885,"score_gpt":0.5485700388656584,"score_spread":0.013875462729469823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772344","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009382692,0.06284879,0.16378227,0.65323687,0.06285784,0.000811916,0.0008902377,0.005880668,0.04875319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011502529,0.1024393,0.49289283,0.14346999,0.033231013,0.0017477656,0.0018108025,0.0055397893,0.207366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98528415,0.0058858013,0.0016329581,0.0009878982,0.005853832,0.0003553511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492063,0.019833585,0.0023215688,0.0031376632,0.022139722,0.0033610424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022602307,0.0020621351,0.0015183135,0.009193841,0.0039286986,0.014401328,0.0030150397,0.0040913443,0.01422385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055118274,0.0010852638,0.0013441689,0.007224158,0.0069796415,0.017024,0.00559486,0.01301451,0.021281984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007887184,0.000020988251,0.000251113,0.00025003238,0.0000130326835,0.000063500695,0.00090429955,0.000106324085,0.00041540392,0.01455364,0.8881924,0.09522129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004655968,0.000012310027,0.0002503554,0.00059461984,0.0000062442396,0.00017672803,0.0006677398,0.0002483351,0.00023787777,0.017792163,0.979977,0.00003188566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008824921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024567144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99080616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035457166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010409552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11953384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772350","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0049","title":"What Can Be Learned about Predatory Journals from a Failed Study? Possible Motivations behind Predatory Journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Grammar; Documentation; Compromise; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.62953521345765,"score_gpt":0.5478280282914975,"score_spread":0.0817071851661525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72216487,0.021048557,0.004868932,0.22713605,0.0021861314,0.00041425743,0.00023182003,0.00009196775,0.02185741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96408504,0.008723044,0.00198741,0.021365205,0.0013706846,0.00022084395,0.00011492054,0.00007993009,0.002052992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.81907994,0.13333613,0.00880905,0.0056485115,0.026162678,0.0069636554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35477215,0.50025594,0.0821693,0.018319618,0.03191215,0.012570832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1573373,0.001029984,0.002439088,0.006818425,0.007448916,0.023918452,0.0042438414,0.008003983,0.004370608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54413044,0.001322451,0.0013663898,0.005860028,0.026927218,0.03494607,0.008807087,0.00684115,0.001227281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001860734,0.0002019203,0.11067284,0.0058756587,0.00038934965,0.0073230527,0.7899099,0.00008110902,0.0005652775,0.00908097,0.008204422,0.067509376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031192707,0.00022117097,0.045099862,0.0066044666,0.00018701976,0.0044349045,0.9040229,0.00016305762,0.0004654604,0.014294654,0.024335185,0.00014016313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033252523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007793486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006555598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009670924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83208907},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4323772433","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0016","title":"Open Citations as a Tool for Bibliometric Verification and Transparency and for Correcting Erroneous References","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Accounting; Library science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.7417604793083047,"score_gpt":0.5951478137790643,"score_spread":0.14661266552924035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772433","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041529387,0.006862862,0.7590559,0.016573118,0.006935044,0.00522509,0.017244117,0.018471373,0.12810305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39328194,0.0023705491,0.56724966,0.0015064197,0.0029992452,0.0045180717,0.005247399,0.0032123164,0.019614346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5992146,0.20759986,0.059092145,0.016104782,0.11377842,0.0042101825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27147886,0.4033532,0.09294866,0.1169431,0.11129757,0.0039786277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23433338,0.0020429117,0.002967152,0.09080849,0.0062947855,0.025340872,0.0053406693,0.004139105,0.02292484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6305523,0.0019187926,0.002210854,0.079444386,0.007275203,0.024797156,0.019715182,0.004949343,0.00827571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061978825,0.00023390878,0.025663495,0.0034053444,0.00059397594,0.0004479676,0.015631575,0.0029301697,0.0029933983,0.34557983,0.062048174,0.5398523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041465307,0.0002736957,0.031841543,0.005006183,0.0007294763,0.0013493504,0.007406043,0.03432748,0.016035605,0.41786584,0.48358294,0.0011672172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005158434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044891476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057676355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020648485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94420326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772434","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0005","title":"Predatory Journals: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Literature Published between 2012 and 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientometrics; Reading (process); Library science; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Citation; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.6089117459446791,"score_gpt":0.6088191351660769,"score_spread":0.00009261077860223121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96509594,0.0066802213,0.0011006471,0.0018956619,0.00009862897,0.00030008404,0.0135838585,0.000051536997,0.011193454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858905,0.002818033,0.0018357666,0.00025787172,0.000113065136,0.0004758139,0.0044402196,0.000022394874,0.0014479032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98940337,0.002818124,0.0016396279,0.00057704473,0.005047838,0.0005139149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89899194,0.052867934,0.022185566,0.0016746412,0.02271589,0.001564059],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011580861,0.00023933129,0.00057642657,0.038192164,0.0009924462,0.003567228,0.00043893777,0.00041816698,0.0021832318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05221889,0.00017912239,0.00046635148,0.04189583,0.0010415224,0.0032799917,0.0019501621,0.00037638054,0.0005183254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065032,0.00014456388,0.68974847,0.009791962,0.00031512027,0.0013577922,0.1174856,0.0004149073,0.0047326502,0.004396651,0.011019926,0.15994197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015820324,0.00018620068,0.84097815,0.0018041672,0.000101538186,0.00077840564,0.123379745,0.00042806374,0.0015248562,0.0011531891,0.029575631,0.00007419864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031262436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035545945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033331062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003164911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061246157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324145313","doi":"10.32388/3ojyk1","title":"Review of: \"Measuring researchers’ success more fairly: going beyond the H-index\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.813147762879632,"score_gpt":0.6387775037866626,"score_spread":0.17437025909296933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324145313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034137032,0.044346835,0.0015446141,0.7586262,0.18443932,0.00019798373,0.0009745607,0.00016947952,0.009359696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013608133,0.10369648,0.0050607105,0.50658005,0.34476262,0.00062425877,0.001300288,0.00039167737,0.023975698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94597954,0.01724276,0.0054556504,0.003155411,0.027049102,0.0011174657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48462933,0.23162366,0.018923922,0.012224675,0.24324375,0.009354727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069047935,0.0014385594,0.0035353736,0.01187871,0.0055895094,0.012428887,0.0052469415,0.01351013,0.013707645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31608656,0.0010499506,0.0016537185,0.011006499,0.009398933,0.009507153,0.0042582266,0.011164309,0.014158149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002817991,0.000013612535,0.00012697205,0.001249958,0.000039808285,0.000013140455,0.00006799106,0.000027939795,0.000045456592,0.0030857362,0.96674067,0.028560558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008847981,0.000045280107,0.0033497952,0.0073904386,0.0002729761,0.00008158569,0.00028447754,0.00036013604,0.00030184965,0.017491765,0.97026247,0.00007073067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012106954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021721689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067628003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03715492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36516476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327679266","doi":"10.1111/cars.12428","title":"The gender citation gap: Why and how it matters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Gender gap; Salary; Perspective (graphical); Wage; Gender bias; Productivity; Gender disparity; Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6570824872764965,"score_gpt":0.503201694649877,"score_spread":0.15388079262661958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327679266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09755788,0.37282965,0.010734359,0.45546114,0.008194953,0.0001004627,0.0031082088,0.0002534179,0.051759955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83927256,0.09557227,0.0036281906,0.045248978,0.008978251,0.00013524549,0.0010786783,0.00027808538,0.005807752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757724,0.007518706,0.0022340484,0.0049711945,0.0077132024,0.0017904041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8653702,0.09340201,0.016159553,0.005549355,0.015488074,0.00403089],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03995659,0.00047678323,0.0015940305,0.009433705,0.0028690188,0.007906999,0.0018892536,0.00252173,0.006698388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14796199,0.00036795347,0.00094912574,0.013755117,0.0083750775,0.010864906,0.0034450544,0.0020956774,0.0018015819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045678232,0.00008106024,0.23980425,0.0055956566,0.0015088653,0.0006053885,0.016838184,0.00069869804,0.00085828616,0.17041565,0.10119309,0.46194407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014336937,0.00023750674,0.3223978,0.011322053,0.0009503714,0.0014414755,0.023268675,0.0011921726,0.0018129362,0.31366888,0.32336983,0.00019498903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03283765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0304409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004715034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059436294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21131313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361012827","doi":"10.1177/25152459221144986","title":"The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science Community From Scratch","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Open science; Grassroots; Mainstream; China; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.6851263766474375,"score_gpt":0.7785367102522119,"score_spread":0.09341033360477446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361012827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24893631,0.005048861,0.22837801,0.10312918,0.009307053,0.0055364254,0.0025620859,0.008621917,0.38848004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72215027,0.0040557077,0.13231675,0.008596502,0.0019422113,0.0049873693,0.0054525025,0.0014627195,0.11903601],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995619,0.0017759145,0.00020326937,0.0005092687,0.0012032613,0.00068921736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97923857,0.0026092723,0.0009068138,0.0024637252,0.0038845001,0.01089724],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009863044,0.00061855366,0.00032928574,0.0025395462,0.0124004865,0.005689812,0.0018545452,0.001958313,0.013022659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012771638,0.00039749037,0.00067247584,0.002358073,0.0036288798,0.013225188,0.016454047,0.0025526287,0.002660814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032971182,0.00033678312,0.018868154,0.0011775705,0.00007496366,0.0020975086,0.038790423,0.0020116274,0.008610838,0.23957677,0.28450483,0.4036208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572011,0.00017333201,0.0061337715,0.00034959643,0.000042106705,0.00030116495,0.010272684,0.0049917977,0.0019580263,0.0364129,0.93914044,0.00014851756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01109501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013487918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99814546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00293105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026372269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052161396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362458627","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2023-004380","title":"Association of literature metrics in gynecologic oncology with country classification by income level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Citation; Gross national income; Middle income country; Publishing; Demography; High income countries; Developing country; China; Family medicine; Gynecology; Internal medicine; Socioeconomics; Library science; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.6804300321512953,"score_gpt":0.6334504089332188,"score_spread":0.04697962321807647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362458627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067625483,0.99084175,0.0002576693,0.00057094684,0.0001406796,0.00004108724,0.000709818,0.00001303961,0.0006624258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13381788,0.86099005,0.0026833494,0.00038817458,0.00030590573,0.00011125239,0.0014321737,0.000015767182,0.0002553984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99131936,0.0022270684,0.003038124,0.00081093464,0.0023762067,0.00022826328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426935,0.038656034,0.011266423,0.0007523921,0.005920593,0.00071097346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010495656,0.00089945673,0.003411049,0.03231311,0.0005961441,0.0033707717,0.0013652608,0.00088893116,0.0027699524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0516461,0.00053905096,0.005469012,0.045286573,0.0010125586,0.002938332,0.0018623282,0.0012620161,0.00031313516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000480268,0.00010119919,0.20404918,0.2519316,0.034130313,0.00023057788,0.00064948876,0.0005655759,0.00034164963,0.0018616231,0.0092445845,0.49641398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002604366,0.0005291292,0.51801413,0.22622208,0.12163853,0.0031202906,0.002781403,0.0014210867,0.00079505885,0.0051092524,0.11986876,0.00023982394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006919905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01937174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98950434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002139572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006230311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055507004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362524064","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011514","title":"The impact of COVID-19 on global health journals: an analysis of impact factor and publication trends","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Wuhan University","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Impact factor; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Outbreak; Medicine; Demography; Geography; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Sociology; Virology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7199216220179786,"score_gpt":0.746428607096397,"score_spread":0.02650698507841842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362524064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929784,0.021167712,0.0024796173,0.0021931936,0.00030436323,0.00032441938,0.038042586,0.000251187,0.0054528075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789306,0.0045034816,0.002168641,0.00019951181,0.0003135901,0.00024233891,0.012696022,0.00007266632,0.0008731442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855504,0.0032594078,0.0032310926,0.001622797,0.005255368,0.0010808014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85004085,0.072771385,0.05165042,0.0050403755,0.01535088,0.005146002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017899197,0.0006461171,0.0011172082,0.018965682,0.0005156897,0.003661899,0.00092222623,0.00068286917,0.0039226147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076569766,0.00030900372,0.002856936,0.03203323,0.0008991123,0.0027740626,0.001979483,0.0010119024,0.0008370772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041527292,0.00007465113,0.9693319,0.0018645073,0.0015049356,0.00023890639,0.00054708956,0.0020087278,0.00032388896,0.0005645414,0.0026718304,0.020453759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046728124,0.00026426016,0.9838305,0.0005240938,0.0007128832,0.0003458116,0.00069842435,0.0046478817,0.00050020765,0.00077183585,0.007609404,0.00004799793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005472349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048660478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018465301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094661176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362581830","doi":"10.3390/publications11020022","title":"Constraints on Research in Biological and Agricultural Science in Developing Countries: The Example of Latin America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latin Americans; Agriculture; Globe; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Economic growth; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.8358821980142553,"score_gpt":0.609083329223973,"score_spread":0.22679886879028233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362581830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07996063,0.096969604,0.0019271618,0.65813434,0.0024424533,0.0000448791,0.00029553784,0.000037003672,0.16018835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78092676,0.12387446,0.0032770536,0.07537842,0.004691258,0.00016625547,0.00022074181,0.000098787874,0.011366246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904522,0.006078626,0.0005812727,0.000453934,0.0012450039,0.0011889647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732131,0.019530486,0.0027712453,0.00066883833,0.00293198,0.00088441797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106455535,0.00046398188,0.0008222069,0.0037187783,0.006644187,0.012790573,0.0014863407,0.0030730255,0.0022666783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019972464,0.00016869973,0.00079237035,0.013053856,0.010762811,0.0053268992,0.005434381,0.0037473228,0.00023593035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013865695,0.00006912806,0.020019062,0.0021994587,0.00010509624,0.0034533641,0.056996975,0.001046672,0.0006503147,0.7922762,0.06638681,0.056658257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044160617,0.000024456702,0.01796006,0.0033842074,0.00008374436,0.00057113945,0.046938065,0.00039108412,0.00033881652,0.053121567,0.8770671,0.00007564251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05810488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08930161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010414407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013797985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11553335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362719734","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102760","title":"Bibliometric analysis of endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism research in South Asia from (2012–2021): Comparison with five developed countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"China; Sri lanka; South asia; Geography; Socioeconomics; Ancient history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.6687499453780853,"score_gpt":0.6189256305916963,"score_spread":0.049824314786389046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362719734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93961906,0.016045226,0.0005722354,0.0018877072,0.00012454981,0.00006583939,0.032137282,0.00011035428,0.009437792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985104,0.004739146,0.0003011731,0.00008304793,0.000059865804,0.000034908993,0.009091644,0.000008793525,0.0005773646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975674,0.00036298565,0.0006871211,0.00026389235,0.0008610461,0.0002575675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215734,0.0018602344,0.002819381,0.00032902687,0.002290244,0.00054364663],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027949202,0.00033955128,0.0011532393,0.02630163,0.0007039047,0.0028899056,0.00064294063,0.00048575347,0.0020459206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104324175,0.0001551635,0.0017773786,0.064105056,0.0004097303,0.0013226118,0.0017705779,0.0004692645,0.00039782815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016704133,0.000056155986,0.96251017,0.0017274192,0.0016256955,0.00027110742,0.0007725253,0.0010085017,0.0002667203,0.00076162996,0.0028528348,0.027980283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005235754,0.000021842145,0.99498796,0.0001339311,0.00035198728,0.00014565783,0.00094010995,0.00041062626,0.00009541639,0.00009962097,0.0027989573,0.000008607531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054967836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044397008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027732896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057439604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109295726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4364357130","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2023.03.001","title":"Changements au bureau de rédaction du JOGC","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.20965244034409364,"score_gpt":0.4560624957645187,"score_spread":0.24641005542042504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4364357130","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035254507,0.0045962813,0.00003713936,0.031701658,0.9622348,0.000014503621,0.00015225422,0.00003901269,0.0011891046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014675811,0.0068738316,0.00021032918,0.018933764,0.9544081,0.00007278931,0.00016792733,0.000089405075,0.017776249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96921647,0.0037423677,0.00290493,0.002239248,0.019855829,0.0020412572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.878595,0.03176178,0.005147195,0.0025814264,0.07139569,0.0105190035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024841959,0.0048261685,0.0066679837,0.012519893,0.004905536,0.012798234,0.006665227,0.027886674,0.037131842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123965636,0.0017036338,0.004520597,0.0075780484,0.0035921037,0.0038628185,0.0021144142,0.016692419,0.015733093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003254557,0.000007711474,0.000035936097,0.00011601597,0.000011178634,0.00003590208,0.0000084030635,0.000019725903,0.000013898522,0.00016917694,0.9967583,0.0027912455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015650531,0.000020393998,0.0010191413,0.000581556,0.00007097739,0.00012839262,0.00006859973,0.00023502388,0.00009890049,0.00040123807,0.9971917,0.000027509757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07759965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10085977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07759965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021030769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02907169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15429592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366254145","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102714","title":"Universal research index: An inclusive metric to quantify scientific research output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; McGill University; Krembil Foundation; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Toronto Western Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Metric (unit); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Disadvantage; Statistics; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Mathematics; Business; Marketing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8635694832816184,"score_gpt":0.6586222012123094,"score_spread":0.204947282069309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366254145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23502463,0.024401048,0.54160476,0.005486999,0.0027251623,0.0012870694,0.0341022,0.0071492502,0.14821902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70495546,0.0063590026,0.2595837,0.0007184519,0.0014313713,0.0011231068,0.012854822,0.0007759195,0.01219809],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755833,0.0040959036,0.0030701188,0.001234301,0.0153783625,0.0006378903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96155924,0.013346457,0.00597796,0.003967632,0.012532337,0.0026162923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014221931,0.000978689,0.0023298985,0.03972484,0.0012381278,0.0071468716,0.0014696122,0.001242828,0.0042464454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061118208,0.0002806219,0.0012495434,0.03768132,0.0013527502,0.0076951445,0.005318571,0.0009237596,0.0019326076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005459625,0.00043216583,0.12217469,0.0030988338,0.0011161297,0.00022620375,0.0016184459,0.0044498434,0.010127956,0.08396883,0.03887317,0.73336774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018545815,0.001876438,0.28015313,0.0018597416,0.0016282034,0.002945471,0.004747282,0.06285457,0.030190175,0.27165183,0.34126058,0.00064723036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012126906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018439104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018602967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040375656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07521367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366658782","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4417249","title":"(Under)Representation of Research Journals from Africa in Web of Science, and Scopus","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Representation (politics); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Politics","score_opus":0.6148023250811404,"score_gpt":0.6161436134869189,"score_spread":0.001341288405778518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366658782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888048,0.014919444,0.0030173117,0.023952777,0.011381178,0.00016341468,0.13407831,0.0016005638,0.122082144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92525023,0.0051011983,0.004405136,0.003178669,0.002687553,0.00013441345,0.028983943,0.00040614675,0.029852672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523455,0.0008916128,0.0010188186,0.0005543758,0.0012615283,0.0010391459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95418644,0.011273631,0.017380098,0.002700021,0.010134478,0.0043252707],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033570344,0.00051319454,0.0005356628,0.018946448,0.00080931,0.0054343324,0.00057020696,0.0008091219,0.017863715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039480973,0.00021172904,0.00042045338,0.032086574,0.00075847015,0.0034282336,0.0018992769,0.0008711759,0.003464584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001598196,0.00013224337,0.3398997,0.0048397994,0.00066169724,0.0009988116,0.0047337334,0.0005150756,0.009582251,0.03217438,0.24311216,0.361752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067446155,0.00009548613,0.6447172,0.0015252377,0.00047439724,0.0028397748,0.0045837956,0.000912024,0.0058513856,0.0047025145,0.3341755,0.00005526877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006065701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074718124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98105353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070603105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019167536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059760094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366701044","doi":"10.54337/aau524581650","title":"Guide til AAU Forskningsindikator","year":2023,"lang":"da","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9161261546430498,"score_gpt":0.7079730066892186,"score_spread":0.20815314795383122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366701044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022589087,0.003381555,0.008309229,0.015769944,0.007354264,0.00076757564,0.048411004,0.0077981236,0.9059494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014638292,0.0011871691,0.005571313,0.0007011165,0.0002736802,0.00029179096,0.009065969,0.0012290407,0.9802161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978935,0.00031526326,0.000121678066,0.00024334395,0.0011978507,0.00022832639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942163,0.0012557352,0.00024562958,0.0006569635,0.002606161,0.0010192576],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026991616,0.00082014425,0.0009469981,0.0031386006,0.0017478208,0.0074939937,0.0011923062,0.0019793683,0.4256309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008228145,0.00075902074,0.0005762387,0.003212104,0.00040450596,0.0030048285,0.0020003126,0.0023107403,0.4945422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026157006,0.000046028756,0.00019564171,0.000050252234,0.0000013495359,0.000017686532,0.00008171193,0.00005268162,0.00026748475,0.0013061957,0.9375569,0.060397953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062010768,0.0000061115493,0.0003993704,0.000038468952,0.0000014435732,0.00001687886,0.000093060655,0.000057427784,0.00018304809,0.00036253134,0.99883145,0.000003955664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014648326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02580303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015559521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009935204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8192678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366776075","doi":"","title":"Panorama sur l’intégrité scientifique : d’hier à aujourd’hui","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.19421802143744496,"score_gpt":0.40440571266100195,"score_spread":0.210187691223557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366776075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069283303,0.26633316,0.016717896,0.47084737,0.05958667,0.00004110925,0.00037785954,0.00041662375,0.178751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29770902,0.21182077,0.022892728,0.06459189,0.1639977,0.00035094563,0.0006694515,0.0010695616,0.23689796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023414,0.003963823,0.00041554848,0.0015214258,0.0031922266,0.0006729796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836663,0.009493412,0.0006505605,0.0012907785,0.003340238,0.0015587611],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014240353,0.0013871626,0.0015507037,0.0063003004,0.006016203,0.020918261,0.0011237882,0.0076139793,0.024555486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020819567,0.00068598636,0.0009490724,0.0052725812,0.014071332,0.0202577,0.0067164297,0.012629373,0.0055012098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011211979,0.000054832944,0.00037301483,0.0005593216,0.000041421394,0.00015987389,0.0030800146,0.00031037987,0.0010877906,0.73482025,0.14877419,0.110626854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016817348,0.00002112863,0.00071137556,0.0003989217,0.000008631323,0.00012918268,0.00064946286,0.00025415033,0.0002638734,0.057483662,0.9400401,0.000022624821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009059197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074103866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99238604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011448073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006824158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08306193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366783310","doi":"10.1186/s41073-023-00128-2","title":"Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Scopus; Peer review; Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Actuarial science; Geography; Statistics; MEDLINE; Political science; Business; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.952932832349722,"score_gpt":0.7128552951760203,"score_spread":0.24007753717370173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366783310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6566857,0.005168077,0.2666029,0.0031419452,0.0005369033,0.025058534,0.019612767,0.00053389434,0.02265937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873638,0.0010367872,0.10984831,0.00031718152,0.000156516,0.009828018,0.0034169354,0.0000677159,0.0016905454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8360619,0.13612506,0.008223615,0.0057640774,0.01167965,0.002145661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5324249,0.35854286,0.06431473,0.019726604,0.022273757,0.0027171695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10251973,0.0013411746,0.0013992139,0.006543948,0.0012727883,0.0031344723,0.0037585334,0.0015936078,0.007324099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3308271,0.0012336669,0.0031525404,0.009599251,0.0019752588,0.004544752,0.003069459,0.0013394476,0.0009418161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003162106,0.0007122679,0.7445717,0.003985724,0.005044026,0.00051087176,0.004072964,0.049682572,0.00031188695,0.024369773,0.014254028,0.1493221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016668335,0.003372098,0.58239555,0.0034198917,0.0038136863,0.0015184132,0.0055665732,0.3146844,0.0013867157,0.04761403,0.03424311,0.00031870074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017352208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99345607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007623096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071955076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5421826},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367308548","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00378-6","title":"Differences in collaboration structures and impact among prominent researchers in Europe and North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Politics; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Network structure; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7026761929763207,"score_gpt":0.5976172621589622,"score_spread":0.10505893081735851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367308548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99292713,0.0005990235,0.00017075392,0.0002725381,0.0000052340865,0.0000063772527,0.00020925756,0.0000049562755,0.0058047553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925596,0.00021410322,0.00011991023,0.000030000067,0.0000066322564,0.0000043522873,0.00015500751,0.0000017252307,0.00021232221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775535,0.00077457575,0.00023087904,0.00038651229,0.000508493,0.00034424372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788265,0.0075455415,0.008129787,0.0007834801,0.002876696,0.00183794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028183134,0.000107173844,0.00037975563,0.005764041,0.00081415835,0.0024108675,0.00027393288,0.00038503922,0.0027069282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013081517,0.00012375858,0.00020935904,0.008111051,0.0007482179,0.0013965792,0.001954768,0.00023245998,0.00021076345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017549234,0.000066048364,0.9687553,0.00011107701,0.00027613033,0.00018121958,0.0053035356,0.00050611666,0.001314765,0.003010078,0.00077727233,0.019522991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010673566,0.000017637421,0.9906619,0.00006150466,0.000046646368,0.00008152078,0.0060068453,0.00024078327,0.00021815031,0.0008969467,0.001749471,0.000007889506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007006399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011388762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009406579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010853182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014904857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322216","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0066","title":"Who is Publishing in Biomedical Predatory Journals? A Study on Chinese Scholars","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Misconduct; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5387497138985565,"score_gpt":0.5629177425169369,"score_spread":0.02416802861838041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973718,0.00073428877,0.000021824097,0.000910739,0.0000121272615,0.000010706823,0.000037148722,0.0000011663803,0.000900126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.0010107671,0.000030768322,0.00032195527,0.000034682613,0.000009370635,0.000032436517,0.0000011216448,0.00025512956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964831,0.00097103603,0.0007157912,0.00028121853,0.0011015013,0.00044728612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97172046,0.008758316,0.012183314,0.00052893144,0.0029278295,0.003881256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005399177,0.00018540492,0.00052758626,0.004389133,0.0021093425,0.0029242644,0.0006305946,0.0007866608,0.0020445094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024175495,0.00030745304,0.0003867272,0.007172796,0.0013960659,0.0035252506,0.0011566383,0.0005446466,0.00026364595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056144974,0.00009289755,0.94299316,0.00014904693,0.000042566735,0.00055625045,0.04383772,0.0000164832,0.00016409445,0.00023516049,0.0006064831,0.011249956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014847222,0.00015023348,0.9074884,0.00011450598,0.00005109321,0.00065664167,0.08889295,0.00012078852,0.000091665606,0.00020001989,0.0021973127,0.00002153271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013187139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012914945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99921334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020591444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038294753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028553963},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367322283","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0045","title":"Review of Research on Predatory Scientific Publications from Scopus Database between 2012 and 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Web of science; The Internet; Library science; Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Political science; Publication; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8131554118121708,"score_gpt":0.6284540156426669,"score_spread":0.18470139616950387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322283","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012772119,0.9698279,0.00047936203,0.004010009,0.0007937936,0.00030509723,0.005943726,0.00005728792,0.005810734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056492366,0.935486,0.0010345497,0.0011747701,0.0004915639,0.00029292383,0.0043893415,0.000028587054,0.0006097464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754342,0.00424605,0.009575317,0.0011270414,0.00894321,0.000674272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8969074,0.05176841,0.023601081,0.0018330519,0.024004899,0.0018851374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140904635,0.00087128015,0.0025190806,0.08776979,0.0013178412,0.0052652634,0.0014560173,0.0012955946,0.0050353324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07319641,0.0006625361,0.0022181324,0.10709086,0.0013523741,0.0042856312,0.0021650326,0.00091014145,0.0008612486],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000459286,0.00009744783,0.023330713,0.43905115,0.0029815724,0.0011395768,0.002231551,0.00028132086,0.0008314331,0.0032067047,0.0376195,0.4887697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808662,0.00025137782,0.11585855,0.4751614,0.009946786,0.0025109341,0.0044354345,0.00030252154,0.0012572835,0.0014970205,0.3885372,0.00015333714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009218442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020066286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045153494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020043798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07451838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367680925","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0059","title":"Chief Statisticians as Second-to-Last Authors in Biomedical Papers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Computer science; Production (economics); Operations research; Data science; Management science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.3840685578789365,"score_gpt":0.5258084745558161,"score_spread":0.14173991667687963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367680925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15903142,0.054985736,0.13368426,0.17770763,0.19735657,0.0031169178,0.010699311,0.010002176,0.25341597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6406046,0.01296646,0.067274384,0.03443498,0.05236064,0.0032338155,0.0055102776,0.0029347618,0.18068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9019184,0.029963117,0.014937902,0.01477898,0.031496167,0.0069054677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6313986,0.11368808,0.07074373,0.030221133,0.09206153,0.061886966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06536465,0.0012069391,0.0030237855,0.019342793,0.0068764044,0.023884093,0.0035629796,0.0060383165,0.042314038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31615102,0.0015694825,0.0012172625,0.019779127,0.004280771,0.013319268,0.0059604445,0.0050734715,0.028457657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025304419,0.00021216912,0.050714858,0.0031285163,0.00022047808,0.0031271712,0.01601944,0.00063372613,0.0027032532,0.09162993,0.41860467,0.41047534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063342485,0.000652476,0.039634217,0.0026174404,0.00031376036,0.0059488616,0.011622738,0.003693436,0.006138337,0.08085669,0.8475035,0.0003851292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013367083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026945637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00908663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017818937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34568542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368360813","doi":"10.1177/08445621231172621","title":"Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; CINAHL; MEDLINE; Health care; Grey literature; Scopus; Empirical research; Multidisciplinary approach; Scientific literature; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Psychological intervention; Biology","score_opus":0.9582995180482285,"score_gpt":0.7773683384431942,"score_spread":0.18093117960503435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368360813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030037798,0.9907934,0.00037088507,0.0027618518,0.0005912695,0.0004727642,0.00022136034,0.000016205722,0.0017683209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019061087,0.97753865,0.0011999054,0.00085014495,0.00040896074,0.000555307,0.00023247764,0.000010711384,0.00014281587],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9440116,0.016344853,0.020994658,0.002118585,0.015535452,0.0009949153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54371667,0.3577579,0.050919626,0.0062639876,0.03894959,0.0023921488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051514454,0.0011358957,0.0039482466,0.07516198,0.0037215338,0.011960099,0.0022848523,0.004647602,0.0040993667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27958986,0.0013409678,0.0032038412,0.08329057,0.0048183836,0.009346591,0.004172776,0.0022222775,0.0008081228],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016017215,0.00011133807,0.009924462,0.63696057,0.0018685012,0.0005282378,0.004565629,0.00022994915,0.00029749304,0.0032937673,0.009294233,0.33276576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023798944,0.000095330506,0.009773623,0.9422439,0.0034503844,0.000830194,0.0035072998,0.000144462,0.00021967804,0.0013729217,0.03829442,0.00004394948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009909313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01852372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010007233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04031843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27243775},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4368364174","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0074","title":"WAAI: A Weighted Author Affiliation Index for Journal Evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Subject (documents); Publication; Index (typography); Journal ranking; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; World Wide Web; Citation; Law","score_opus":0.7034173796001133,"score_gpt":0.5923809843819302,"score_spread":0.11103639521818309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368364174","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107382484,0.0030926582,0.85807544,0.00091548276,0.0005043876,0.0029077868,0.005028011,0.0033617553,0.018732121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4123805,0.0007982828,0.57692903,0.00016260578,0.0003424294,0.002899132,0.0033270887,0.0002967865,0.0028641638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722764,0.012111095,0.002379044,0.0014370634,0.011209918,0.00058649323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459901,0.02884677,0.008850723,0.0033056997,0.011763198,0.0012435057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018531537,0.0014874572,0.0015463687,0.030657263,0.0011635824,0.004700373,0.0015364066,0.0013019342,0.0032258497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0806136,0.0003483229,0.0013863128,0.026172303,0.000983545,0.0045743487,0.0026028547,0.0012628621,0.0016246476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066530105,0.00057871,0.073411874,0.0012764958,0.0014489898,0.0001282457,0.0008324484,0.020956289,0.007802608,0.02319983,0.01649436,0.8532048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004352794,0.0040742815,0.18836829,0.0008262232,0.0012345337,0.0009712123,0.0020741576,0.54741347,0.027695235,0.15231712,0.07380968,0.0007805764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010167311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015033424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98146844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015223707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024391725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098005295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4371783741","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4435262","title":"Grade Concept Article 5: Addressing Intransitivity in a Network Meta-Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University Health Network; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7411568501808912,"score_gpt":0.5766564847254608,"score_spread":0.16450036545543034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4371783741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092664346,0.07967806,0.7128803,0.027934073,0.024771295,0.013716328,0.02181472,0.0029191272,0.023621816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6429094,0.0067767384,0.30852804,0.007844636,0.004470144,0.014985749,0.0039899317,0.0013378432,0.009157517],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.74457204,0.202037,0.016552111,0.019695515,0.01539256,0.0017507699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47714978,0.47318968,0.011822195,0.024182603,0.010863886,0.0027918413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13915356,0.003224974,0.0066429693,0.008769032,0.0026547357,0.008883565,0.0041403077,0.0064409613,0.030244375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5113487,0.0016089174,0.016051853,0.009593487,0.0026876274,0.008438379,0.0076176943,0.0076284297,0.0015006942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013025598,0.0008250846,0.048705414,0.10290912,0.3509335,0.0008554236,0.0021401863,0.010648478,0.003992199,0.06830928,0.058507744,0.33914804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010503766,0.005123918,0.031878807,0.01602241,0.40400025,0.0011342341,0.0009255574,0.0540423,0.00681646,0.3747955,0.094064265,0.00069259893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020176473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052003735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86084646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022419377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005780879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7359232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375949667","doi":"10.54900/bzt33-6b575","title":"Opening New Paths to Technology Transfer: Open Science, Intellectual Property, and Technology Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Technology transfer; Open innovation; Open science; Engineering ethics; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6442639237692555,"score_gpt":0.5662192654737422,"score_spread":0.07804465829551321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375949667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076991254,0.008795525,0.011577199,0.7147596,0.0026974946,0.000054655946,0.0005984425,0.00026703643,0.25355095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68073803,0.03523032,0.034546614,0.10578408,0.0062565086,0.00039092812,0.0013865046,0.000819712,0.13484728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876208,0.0046390803,0.00049670937,0.0010618545,0.004548198,0.0016333697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610898,0.020357594,0.0032277072,0.0027143392,0.0074624224,0.0051481654],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012482221,0.000606771,0.0009857786,0.0054413592,0.012258791,0.04141011,0.0020007475,0.0076141665,0.0534457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04051849,0.000554625,0.0010901063,0.012504517,0.03363788,0.042663284,0.008858137,0.009159105,0.005617604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038994567,0.000022490718,0.0010781814,0.00015039044,0.0000144131245,0.00010378311,0.0020196536,0.00017159458,0.000116539246,0.84981966,0.115381785,0.031082578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012416581,0.0000061934734,0.0016718067,0.00031191294,0.000011069685,0.00007741145,0.0036214555,0.0005152776,0.0003355671,0.81641173,0.1769778,0.000047395326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08738889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12503082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99799925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029272206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034990683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21238571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377195858","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.18.541286","title":"Contrasting the open access dissemination of COVID-19 and SDG research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Open access publishing; Open science; Open access journal; Political science; Sustainable development; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sustainability; Publishing; Library science; Business; Computer science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.6805566466641992,"score_gpt":0.6084941788058503,"score_spread":0.07206246785834891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377195858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65909404,0.048728585,0.010428892,0.06564103,0.0034861595,0.00040408043,0.03151798,0.0005703757,0.18012889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727433,0.0076566483,0.002927764,0.0025673856,0.0017296287,0.00019335788,0.007041402,0.00018430079,0.0049562915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9311414,0.019920282,0.010158043,0.0047411676,0.03074852,0.0032906695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43115106,0.37763882,0.081961796,0.024112219,0.07269704,0.012439057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065471426,0.0002733258,0.0010504349,0.038190234,0.0015107256,0.01827418,0.0013621716,0.0013035125,0.012393656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3536062,0.0002845988,0.000708889,0.05582976,0.004554114,0.009630196,0.008234365,0.0012739404,0.0018611202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012978741,0.00018491707,0.4989185,0.008974427,0.0011109901,0.00081287813,0.023033151,0.0016453501,0.0029720028,0.14949885,0.048676718,0.26287428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013853841,0.00026404322,0.6931002,0.003912671,0.00035223778,0.0006793557,0.020387214,0.0012766438,0.002649355,0.03535995,0.24168985,0.0001899249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045012124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004717592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99863786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049784984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005104759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34625012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377237188","doi":"10.1515/9780228003106-007","title":"The Elusive Pursuit of Internationalization in Canadian Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.3254953305572419,"score_gpt":0.44188473219927416,"score_spread":0.11638940164203226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377237188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01984358,0.034048773,0.0018361107,0.09742146,0.0009259483,0.00003647209,0.00021887344,0.000083293235,0.84558547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7744734,0.045040984,0.0045539057,0.009487806,0.0006107841,0.00007373919,0.00018550498,0.0002468996,0.165327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99109566,0.0010848477,0.00022617186,0.00061426207,0.0041914526,0.0027876224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925056,0.001955354,0.0002974603,0.00051668496,0.0031472305,0.0015776805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005206878,0.00059046753,0.0007841251,0.0073542837,0.023113277,0.02099417,0.001696928,0.003301917,0.00983827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014944109,0.000614967,0.0006340167,0.019873226,0.032277912,0.007969818,0.006113268,0.0056386166,0.00066222704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089139985,0.0000041850367,0.0003884225,0.0000458473,0.000004988868,0.00005004892,0.0052755023,0.00015333133,0.000037443573,0.9456477,0.025758453,0.022625204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013693636,0.000009687091,0.0067284466,0.0005379434,0.000021762868,0.00011194784,0.015686542,0.00039898558,0.00013603063,0.28278038,0.69350237,0.00007230027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98210996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16091023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24275431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377825501","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2023-004460","title":"Evaluating open access publication and research impact in gynecologic oncology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Gynecologic cancer; Odds ratio; Internal medicine; Oncology; Impact factor; Citation; Gynecology; Cancer; Library science; Ovarian cancer","score_opus":0.9559723428180329,"score_gpt":0.8286021912471291,"score_spread":0.1273701515709038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377825501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92403054,0.03192547,0.0033672655,0.00555951,0.0011189323,0.00035302524,0.0071743387,0.0002083584,0.026262516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905663,0.0036597091,0.0013348663,0.00017469605,0.0008734203,0.00009583067,0.0022066617,0.000037657395,0.0010508207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9387315,0.017687941,0.009380374,0.001973665,0.029983226,0.002243288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6241431,0.24644278,0.05931912,0.010478279,0.046544395,0.013072239],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04585119,0.0007912408,0.0021995907,0.055826258,0.0014516797,0.012649944,0.0015696865,0.0017704185,0.005458503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29860404,0.00031101942,0.0028124163,0.077674925,0.001961626,0.0060031745,0.0046898574,0.001583817,0.0011923386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069649826,0.00058082526,0.8897648,0.0013185564,0.0024298728,0.00019351483,0.0007893767,0.0009198312,0.00021365807,0.0019204819,0.0030119603,0.09816074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017724025,0.00080400566,0.9690437,0.00070520624,0.00287366,0.00062810635,0.0033821845,0.0036384698,0.0008565365,0.010320502,0.0074782786,0.00009224289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034415284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043705828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034940373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006628492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24248713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378575846","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16780","title":"An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Popularity; Science Citation Index; Web of science; Guideline; MEDLINE; Citation analysis; Citation; Medicine; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7839664267245572,"score_gpt":0.6837513455007528,"score_spread":0.1002150812238044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378575846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75805503,0.05416758,0.08932362,0.017237518,0.0012790269,0.005394804,0.036453024,0.0019622706,0.036127094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87092286,0.012365506,0.09445743,0.0008661711,0.00036974082,0.004247863,0.015140105,0.00016531449,0.0014650823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.804322,0.06930173,0.07307078,0.0076453914,0.043383107,0.002277011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58338904,0.15170337,0.10310329,0.027464714,0.13166174,0.0026778968],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15798111,0.0007301296,0.0016050579,0.05767937,0.0014665799,0.0070443465,0.0023786328,0.0010628632,0.001055982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33066043,0.00052683346,0.0029009376,0.06869022,0.0012050327,0.005562202,0.0032659278,0.0010985625,0.0007218255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003912666,0.00013778011,0.6932422,0.008170507,0.0016559256,0.00029117297,0.0067518596,0.001135414,0.002031778,0.0045667407,0.008160967,0.27346438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010406253,0.00079847605,0.90296507,0.0063736727,0.0025667977,0.0013290445,0.0131361205,0.0065720794,0.0075485487,0.0052277045,0.053095557,0.0002829417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058038803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069420002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94232064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003468704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090069305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.835494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379054549","doi":"10.1111/joes.12571","title":"Thirty years of academic finance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of California, Los Angeles; Peking University; Università Bocconi; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Tsinghua University; University of Melbourne; University of Sydney; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Manchester; Nanyang Technological University; National University of Singapore; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of New South Wales; Institut de Valorisation des Données; York University; University of Pennsylvania; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.6134253014497257,"score_gpt":0.5668620003421732,"score_spread":0.04656330110755258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379054549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61189073,0.13895437,0.0013483077,0.09117777,0.0050385436,0.00013830113,0.006144982,0.00012861451,0.14517839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91966724,0.040740926,0.0005334427,0.0051924335,0.003397376,0.00008687243,0.0020788193,0.000043106724,0.028259711],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962451,0.00096223515,0.00031619015,0.00044541998,0.0014520922,0.00057903747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922677,0.0041639362,0.004969118,0.0010064461,0.003919122,0.006714669],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052022906,0.00037043268,0.0005516031,0.0046919053,0.0032317457,0.0062433593,0.00055212306,0.0009757125,0.018993517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016809572,0.0002444989,0.00036598337,0.009389232,0.0017796837,0.0033509138,0.0038481054,0.0014548523,0.0046513006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032635455,0.0003915898,0.32776734,0.001693613,0.00016790602,0.0011576806,0.032220613,0.0009809183,0.000892256,0.07510236,0.17329788,0.38600147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015100153,0.00019185246,0.3214433,0.0010007675,0.00003211976,0.00047864896,0.016295668,0.00021887371,0.00018946186,0.006281889,0.6538175,0.000034784433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052458537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008264975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034514517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004050787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063539684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379057187","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v16i2.849","title":"How Should We Recognize the Important Role of the Peer Reviewer?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Loyalist College","funders":"","keywords":"Bodywork; Peer review; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.5736884125290285,"score_gpt":0.6400948181856465,"score_spread":0.06640640565661804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379057187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015495007,0.013183513,0.00093637675,0.5161471,0.4677939,0.00004919297,0.0000311138,0.0001630489,0.0015408187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061626914,0.030562451,0.0039429646,0.24282771,0.70531845,0.0001953881,0.000058023932,0.00032864301,0.010603675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90166116,0.023476962,0.014900788,0.0074225757,0.049306676,0.0032317957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38581753,0.16435908,0.025141045,0.0176773,0.3482422,0.058762837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1015985,0.0019095369,0.0044633793,0.003947397,0.006963139,0.030156767,0.006121426,0.028786099,0.009323648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5190407,0.0013311894,0.001810013,0.0027950823,0.010874663,0.027555076,0.0035017661,0.035473,0.01659279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069284986,0.000022457682,0.00024922276,0.0010400298,0.00005292437,0.00016885319,0.0003803618,0.000036513586,0.00013298335,0.003166443,0.9512163,0.04346476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009210929,0.000062586274,0.0006302763,0.0018455699,0.0001073397,0.00065498875,0.0008032138,0.00022358098,0.0002187008,0.0112111755,0.9840385,0.00011198688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031675594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008060245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005151613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02370604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53731066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379230918","doi":"10.3390/publications11020032","title":"Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Peer review; Consistency (knowledge bases); Technical peer review; Reading (process); Peer feedback; Public relations; Advice (programming); Narrative review; Medical education; Narrative; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.8011725688322632,"score_gpt":0.6687242451278416,"score_spread":0.1324483237044216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379230918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27315107,0.051202442,0.07841369,0.16162707,0.03161943,0.0060185394,0.0008602246,0.0024060488,0.39470157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85109985,0.013312646,0.059205808,0.012701452,0.008294896,0.002847045,0.0006154929,0.0009490086,0.05097377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6660087,0.20601167,0.036246356,0.012994931,0.069135636,0.009602728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3136044,0.20779331,0.09463129,0.045505475,0.24020985,0.098255746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17502463,0.0010344269,0.0016146778,0.010441583,0.014636059,0.029247418,0.0043141735,0.0039655007,0.010242157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4694479,0.001349246,0.001051964,0.0062935543,0.008344608,0.011156548,0.014007196,0.0053742323,0.0061103017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085097307,0.0004343347,0.11885907,0.005124588,0.0004893158,0.0026503904,0.19908361,0.00089975307,0.0058229044,0.0702838,0.11958029,0.4759211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022345966,0.00082682277,0.04676485,0.0057859765,0.0004118307,0.0065339743,0.09458681,0.0016704956,0.0035862497,0.035204347,0.8035524,0.0008528066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025243484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037000866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006877427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042346176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9256298},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379364963","doi":"10.1002/asi.24758","title":"A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Directory; Library science; Citation; Bibliometrics; World Wide Web; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.28533283705545054,"score_gpt":0.536237433066305,"score_spread":0.25090459601085446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379364963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166335,0.05534794,0.0014262403,0.0031500545,0.00023694441,0.00015484239,0.0073159314,0.00008629519,0.015648412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894776,0.015712084,0.0016446081,0.0002772501,0.00020937878,0.00008325193,0.0025227654,0.000049800637,0.0005531463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833067,0.0054750605,0.0048166197,0.00094498985,0.0045424094,0.000914192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8187193,0.08423011,0.050159495,0.0054227537,0.037308216,0.0041601057],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016348,0.00046250303,0.0009968741,0.049533363,0.001098119,0.0054129013,0.00093991973,0.00074426725,0.0043728785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14625323,0.00035707292,0.0006332268,0.053755507,0.00088908325,0.007844777,0.0032092794,0.00040425517,0.000719376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077390845,0.00018107206,0.74688965,0.010026492,0.0012535524,0.000786959,0.0158117,0.00026349496,0.0024303424,0.0028811859,0.0048685228,0.21383321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043973076,0.00031284537,0.9288998,0.0072766235,0.00075571134,0.002940486,0.025534878,0.0008668186,0.0018960298,0.0013810877,0.029994916,0.00009680201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027600704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038085643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95046663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010121887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023726649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08645755},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379469623","doi":"10.1186/s12961-023-01001-w","title":"Exploring the merits of research performance measures that comply with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment and strategies to overcome barriers of adoption: qualitative interviews with administrators and researchers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Stem Cell Network; Toronto General Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"University Health Network","keywords":"Health services research; Declaration; Qualitative research; Health administration; Public health; Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.9728135525667861,"score_gpt":0.7340543094144618,"score_spread":0.23875924315232433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379469623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8796872,0.002859913,0.05209186,0.049445465,0.0005292028,0.0029083902,0.00015218614,0.00022868536,0.012097158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765464,0.00079492386,0.016657602,0.002716061,0.0000883482,0.0020007354,0.000044003707,0.00007899854,0.0010728705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.67912096,0.27308148,0.013032236,0.0066050217,0.017370325,0.010790051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5892588,0.30654827,0.03277561,0.01209679,0.04220448,0.017116114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26112187,0.00087711343,0.0012799699,0.0038112337,0.014745341,0.013285309,0.0040573427,0.004053633,0.0011319272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29115525,0.0017192552,0.0008859742,0.0029205657,0.023161381,0.010868438,0.010473903,0.008492218,0.00035808468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025444426,0.00006185139,0.0035755131,0.00023660909,0.000009260281,0.00033715475,0.98305815,0.00009578013,0.0011429186,0.004221146,0.0008346527,0.006401546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111565205,0.00010454163,0.0018059515,0.000517417,0.000008679696,0.00021622748,0.97593176,0.00036638347,0.00063692196,0.0017490232,0.018601928,0.000049990427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00554524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004862521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99618876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019097645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036881566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9111683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380150010","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1557","title":"MSR21 Impact of Correlated Outcomes in Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses When Treatment Effects Are Derived from a Network Meta-Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"EVERSANA (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Econometrics; Probabilistic logic; Sensitivity (control systems); Regression; Meta-regression; Correlation; Regression analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.8169312145311791,"score_gpt":0.6222054501852085,"score_spread":0.19472576434597066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380150010","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20449567,0.12090363,0.57774484,0.013453772,0.006559398,0.0060710325,0.038122717,0.0039597335,0.028689235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93050605,0.0043727043,0.050290633,0.0030629921,0.00108696,0.0028388826,0.0039675618,0.00078205834,0.0030921719],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.57010436,0.37647796,0.017479187,0.023470268,0.010295976,0.0021722228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20239332,0.7517396,0.0124577,0.028214324,0.0041545657,0.0010405007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.283667,0.0046306215,0.010606651,0.007510641,0.0015579727,0.0077623245,0.004794068,0.005510413,0.017944079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61743265,0.0036044952,0.046171233,0.0071022473,0.0033357814,0.007904128,0.005980979,0.010079832,0.0016015833],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030029153,0.00029309365,0.05771196,0.022619678,0.66970634,0.0022646678,0.00082180323,0.11838538,0.0014162646,0.015071998,0.010128563,0.07155107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005470272,0.002424751,0.035244364,0.0057259663,0.62637997,0.0024611496,0.00053793704,0.18336397,0.0040454795,0.11455245,0.01910824,0.0006855333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00710182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004619023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71633303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024846203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030838242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8833661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380364391","doi":"10.3176/earth.2023.56","title":"Ordovician scientometrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences Geology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ordovician; Scientometrics; Paleontology; Geology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5186620442457053,"score_gpt":0.5528916263581309,"score_spread":0.03422958211242566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380364391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13328025,0.03566258,0.013529646,0.002603141,0.0015950096,0.0012351335,0.31182006,0.0044839415,0.4957902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6008346,0.026408724,0.01713025,0.00051175046,0.001969878,0.0014952131,0.29895017,0.0017602374,0.050939117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757343,0.0025948123,0.0029744818,0.0021046903,0.014898587,0.0016931867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251927,0.0029527987,0.0025693118,0.002374209,0.008620817,0.00096364814],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008885756,0.0016593941,0.0020564182,0.11323297,0.0017548441,0.009297118,0.0019756763,0.000640166,0.027232023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033461332,0.00039886258,0.0014857415,0.19582587,0.0016073227,0.0028238222,0.004637453,0.00093218155,0.00810451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045213953,0.00013295146,0.14031464,0.008211763,0.0009885543,0.00073400687,0.0057016127,0.0045533795,0.0010072192,0.06586929,0.24652074,0.52551377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002889197,0.000033944765,0.17887816,0.0006521958,0.00012798775,0.0002833476,0.0015743251,0.00125115,0.0005531405,0.0074968524,0.80906004,0.00005993616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02501629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017460825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044724206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064251763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091100216},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4380786331","doi":"10.18438/eblip30206","title":"Factors Affecting Publication Impact and Citation Trends Over Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Research Libraries; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Scopus; Citation impact; Library science; Bibliometrics; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3470391982219514,"score_gpt":0.5219199714307318,"score_spread":0.17488077320878037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380786331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96634233,0.013556866,0.00331041,0.0029174217,0.00024291126,0.00018154336,0.003978382,0.000121983285,0.009348169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920415,0.0026655358,0.001723514,0.0000952435,0.0003000672,0.0000969668,0.0019211544,0.00003011754,0.0011258215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085266,0.004281171,0.00476811,0.0017347551,0.0073089153,0.0010544393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71930695,0.133814,0.091864966,0.0068225856,0.044226717,0.0039647296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025455823,0.00035581426,0.0007880534,0.01735642,0.0009146664,0.0047044456,0.0008288868,0.0008156858,0.0029316968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1477842,0.00024782194,0.0013108104,0.042191193,0.0007480918,0.004395246,0.0011722656,0.0009285396,0.0009454618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018578852,0.000088100234,0.9478036,0.0006547582,0.00037787313,0.00019740999,0.0015851761,0.0005398552,0.0004910684,0.0007240873,0.0010423536,0.046309922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001040507,0.00016230789,0.9884964,0.00020885952,0.00020541801,0.0003990621,0.001476973,0.0008781205,0.00094231754,0.0009838985,0.0062011527,0.00003517349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031913207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003606892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016978363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025244579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13462484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381252825","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.09911","title":"Uncited articles and their effect on the concentration of citations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; CLARITY; Discipline; Distribution (mathematics); Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.7628013580059617,"score_gpt":0.5888631677423554,"score_spread":0.17393819026360635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381252825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96653104,0.010037012,0.0021453886,0.0031585437,0.00016450873,0.000029226852,0.0008425253,0.00014499747,0.016946806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642664,0.0009774562,0.0003078784,0.00011854927,0.00017955682,0.000012539229,0.0002978973,0.0000332534,0.001646163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893345,0.004276393,0.0011594078,0.0014301199,0.002948393,0.0008510363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6348025,0.2862307,0.04776682,0.008289846,0.015370554,0.0075396374],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096730115,0.00038858328,0.0010362436,0.007608649,0.0012959111,0.006754209,0.0013422921,0.0013708319,0.00840141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17941567,0.00022941659,0.00063160126,0.014276679,0.0019480287,0.00397823,0.0031587025,0.0016096008,0.0016342081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018823784,0.00035998804,0.8739739,0.00077915716,0.0011415231,0.0012967054,0.008217372,0.0035846813,0.0022890144,0.019743027,0.004845719,0.08188654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070704955,0.00036239298,0.95351505,0.00034477175,0.0006818159,0.0009371456,0.0042357245,0.0058232388,0.0027124502,0.020413028,0.010833749,0.00006984471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051009073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027298478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99239135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020392274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011297249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0511564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382359902","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_27","title":"Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Collaborative bioethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Federatie van Universitair Medische Centra; VSNU Vereniging van Universiteiten; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Scrutiny; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Sustainability; Narrative; Political science; Competition (biology); Work (physics); Management science; Public relations; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.9734157568319641,"score_gpt":0.7977039594585251,"score_spread":0.175711797373439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382359902","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001530286,0.88264817,0.0022070757,0.105365366,0.005199775,0.0001228425,0.000066638095,0.000023451139,0.004213656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012916466,0.9321336,0.008580188,0.03896013,0.0051870258,0.00069540826,0.00011345182,0.000054733788,0.0013589968],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8500463,0.09719664,0.019622557,0.0052722637,0.02609549,0.0017668093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5914364,0.31967136,0.021386836,0.0111165745,0.053516485,0.0028725045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15846324,0.0011798088,0.0027018622,0.012388071,0.0030103577,0.013203642,0.0038661466,0.009045979,0.0038290205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34177428,0.001372987,0.0020655843,0.012333811,0.010371333,0.025533041,0.005788879,0.0119437985,0.0021670908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011022294,0.000037925794,0.00037011562,0.11141638,0.0004010064,0.0004157117,0.00761868,0.00034197583,0.00046176734,0.2633515,0.20697355,0.40850112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017425438,0.00003391884,0.0003318537,0.15999551,0.0001574246,0.00027782202,0.0023461098,0.00008735966,0.00014687097,0.025267199,0.8113037,0.00003496805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005441272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00845339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84153676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01215346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046326984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83804375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383377022","doi":"10.1515/9780773556119-030","title":"Milestones in the Development of Science in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.2164267760325588,"score_gpt":0.3772339689302712,"score_spread":0.16080719289771242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383377022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10037785,0.03146654,0.0018022839,0.05241399,0.00097408757,0.00023307465,0.00261262,0.00025368363,0.80986583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7361792,0.024363944,0.003525875,0.002580183,0.00015729389,0.000094060815,0.0012883868,0.00013539784,0.23167564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469525,0.00030754047,0.00015292867,0.00023271782,0.0026133535,0.0019982872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939009,0.0005724835,0.00021609948,0.00008603553,0.0032020204,0.0020224985],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024479597,0.00044486672,0.00037182367,0.004696524,0.008062419,0.008019968,0.0016166968,0.0013922727,0.010929145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007853176,0.0004246137,0.00041278082,0.0071288426,0.00392075,0.0018423146,0.0034828319,0.0030914752,0.0011620788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014600751,0.000072758514,0.0123008005,0.0004953773,0.0000398775,0.0005892456,0.00649229,0.0026594081,0.0006924102,0.67780644,0.11832776,0.18037757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032459542,0.00006531756,0.06177547,0.00060598674,0.000024011462,0.00013090094,0.0062732133,0.0013966169,0.0010647384,0.024209587,0.9043496,0.00007207263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99062085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99530345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17899361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3677925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383458632","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-022","title":"The More Thou Searchest, the More Thou Shalt Marvel: The Role of Canadian Science","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thou; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18719993304544555,"score_gpt":0.3850501530651588,"score_spread":0.19785022001971322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383458632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051850923,0.1244949,0.0021832667,0.44656032,0.0072694053,0.000038143244,0.00076987577,0.00018174094,0.4133173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17845228,0.12258762,0.007243381,0.071979254,0.0023570082,0.00006723782,0.000609516,0.00056727487,0.6161365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499124,0.00066177396,0.00009010331,0.00037532204,0.0029663362,0.000915098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949303,0.00094833155,0.00013861139,0.00017626907,0.002668064,0.0011383859],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036381676,0.0007834981,0.0008031107,0.005704333,0.01769723,0.020551996,0.0018237846,0.005774248,0.030425241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00956377,0.00065236626,0.0004948263,0.013721519,0.022567766,0.012139237,0.0033932822,0.0056024655,0.0038185222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031749514,0.000016871032,0.0010253655,0.00025070444,0.000014084907,0.00008818251,0.008805448,0.00012437365,0.00019169334,0.42348725,0.48841524,0.07754906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005477448,0.000005433299,0.0012726848,0.00028483482,0.000011754194,0.0000481825,0.0050987685,0.00007642859,0.000090836525,0.034797963,0.95827293,0.000034725475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99636185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11511785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17912908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8352424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383748228","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2023.1448","title":"Sub-Saharan Africa's biomedical journal coverage in scholarly databases: a comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Directory; MEDLINE; Web of science; Library science; Bibliometrics; Online database; Medicine; Index (typography); Database; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.255144196718167,"score_gpt":0.49292451794027803,"score_spread":0.237780321222111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383748228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59425455,0.3630162,0.00096073456,0.0057852333,0.00021555972,0.00024938685,0.02284667,0.00007316484,0.012598502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8395259,0.14664651,0.0033773005,0.0009426092,0.00027097017,0.00025044085,0.008440125,0.00003560859,0.00051052676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989974,0.0025657932,0.0039754794,0.00075876684,0.002259923,0.0004661005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92318213,0.044749293,0.022977944,0.00095089816,0.0067301732,0.0014095282],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008140656,0.000438108,0.0012594477,0.06076836,0.0007483509,0.005322371,0.00083328475,0.00086608535,0.003446561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067290135,0.00025286496,0.0007504713,0.08568851,0.0007758644,0.0053144936,0.0024891258,0.0003360874,0.0005176732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010791614,0.00019813496,0.533054,0.0604607,0.00280196,0.0011215416,0.012647926,0.0003453647,0.0020867225,0.0024032996,0.0067614135,0.3770397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008384025,0.00031164932,0.8905221,0.023819664,0.002376149,0.003951032,0.026387723,0.00046949973,0.0011815081,0.0012580795,0.049562614,0.00007612245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032438242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005960066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095495186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027700989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043052375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383823903","doi":"10.14293/s2199-ssp-am23-01018","title":"Correlations in APC, IF, and Publication Output from Authors in Lower Income Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Impact factor; Equity (law); Net income; Business; Library science; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Computer science; Accounting; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.44460632682092166,"score_gpt":0.5434239928255709,"score_spread":0.0988176660046492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383823903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96534425,0.0017698946,0.0010417596,0.0014190876,0.00012369094,0.000034019133,0.018327648,0.00010194549,0.0118377255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99006534,0.0007667989,0.0005842279,0.0001496634,0.00012399632,0.00003563062,0.006384902,0.000060443603,0.0018288691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974584,0.00046496993,0.0005490715,0.00053825945,0.00052062,0.00046865785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444683,0.019864703,0.023047546,0.0030676315,0.006133335,0.0034185303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033771838,0.0003852698,0.0005778078,0.0040905653,0.00051666686,0.0027160638,0.00046625035,0.00039165388,0.013382785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034861792,0.00019833315,0.0006749643,0.010453118,0.0006219053,0.0014401143,0.001275551,0.0011262551,0.0024451576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010381132,0.000019844203,0.99095553,0.00011496335,0.00019879635,0.00013760217,0.00035773855,0.00027343366,0.0001587849,0.0005443273,0.0017402194,0.005395019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010630855,0.000039825103,0.9935122,0.00010412671,0.000087308494,0.00031346656,0.00087171054,0.00030853756,0.0002661724,0.0004436949,0.0040269103,0.000015479887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004089932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031700253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045595827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006931231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044769883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383989145","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0287660","title":"Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Training (meteorology); Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.8914307221644698,"score_gpt":0.6262767588437951,"score_spread":0.26515396332067476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383989145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99840564,0.00021510448,0.00014271741,0.00013513681,0.000006065064,0.00006400638,0.0002474081,0.0000042080565,0.00077968964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986364,0.00034325029,0.000272417,0.00013643595,0.000014367468,0.00008361131,0.00019057316,0.0000036588037,0.00031930313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663204,0.0013611467,0.00043868282,0.00034854523,0.00082211546,0.0003974285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836623,0.004876589,0.006969833,0.00046854754,0.002040329,0.0019824344],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006290364,0.0002159935,0.00047643326,0.0014430927,0.00055445405,0.0014348241,0.00050394674,0.00073586835,0.0015929539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016421221,0.00043891586,0.00032140102,0.0015366627,0.0006018919,0.0018625922,0.0011024199,0.00083668163,0.0006911436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053676384,0.00030554718,0.98453057,0.00011519111,0.000021027652,0.00016528147,0.008339527,0.000029585668,0.00028967025,0.000042720214,0.00042916994,0.0056779324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007706166,0.00058265025,0.9770785,0.00008970279,0.000019774272,0.00075121125,0.019618921,0.0001741216,0.00018589245,0.000040441242,0.0014329067,0.000018155015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011093196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001141645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036631865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000722917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03326702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384010727","doi":"10.1017/9781009401968.016","title":"Weak interactions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.4934816792221459,"score_gpt":0.4529067373471592,"score_spread":0.040574941874986725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384010727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026129417,0.019993518,0.037019297,0.010368177,0.004575515,0.000109346125,0.004303956,0.0013449122,0.9196723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114301965,0.031228008,0.018142918,0.00932876,0.0061215186,0.0004458027,0.009551373,0.0021089695,0.8087707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.00023155796,0.000054114516,0.00022620925,0.00038066783,0.00010507785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979518,0.0006796443,0.00013073716,0.00038085048,0.00068745465,0.00016949618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011791476,0.0012603909,0.0012080278,0.002775073,0.0013190202,0.0034414302,0.002037565,0.0012153803,0.23850545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048017087,0.00036919594,0.00096604537,0.001956029,0.0009547653,0.0045552445,0.0025321385,0.002245157,0.07868874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050503208,0.00002365634,0.00018067371,0.0010478145,0.00006271933,0.00014319037,0.000114552284,0.0012361275,0.0005353448,0.4867744,0.4183064,0.09152452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133050835,0.000030523275,0.0003546598,0.0003468691,0.00005202935,0.00023236689,0.00008035119,0.0012641397,0.0006448859,0.3225126,0.67444426,0.000024043093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013798218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015549924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014192131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010474444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79788023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384198044","doi":"10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2","title":"The future of academic publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; The Quebec Population Health Research Network","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Data science; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.44298287936265907,"score_gpt":0.5871568274627865,"score_spread":0.14417394810012746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384198044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054239645,0.15483475,0.002206538,0.5982227,0.008792925,0.0000123702885,0.00035935533,0.00017893383,0.22996847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48082623,0.28093323,0.006206458,0.056475464,0.053212915,0.00008757484,0.00067352183,0.00021961748,0.12136496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992409,0.0033266556,0.00038798372,0.0007291319,0.0025873329,0.0005598857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657887,0.014847314,0.0027716602,0.002938281,0.007650661,0.0060033984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010656819,0.00047047672,0.0009053507,0.0049838256,0.0035914928,0.023262853,0.0014313858,0.0076970416,0.038902067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026364313,0.00030292344,0.00054101984,0.007517035,0.010716811,0.02163714,0.0031582145,0.005239985,0.010633235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008629931,0.00006507092,0.0019170757,0.00049424777,0.00003772565,0.00012222296,0.0011286449,0.00041398747,0.00023713974,0.6382379,0.18191253,0.17534725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013960779,0.000019294612,0.0017595956,0.0005247664,0.000013534684,0.00010984145,0.0013110924,0.00043827857,0.00011326391,0.32303742,0.672637,0.000022024928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030471033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044708666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99501616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005190587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010404548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13014042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384213045","doi":"10.1515/9780773556102-030","title":"Les grandes étapes du développement des sciences au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Materials science","score_opus":0.28925944252305946,"score_gpt":0.394887656668815,"score_spread":0.10562821414575552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384213045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22975628,0.07887853,0.0055058473,0.054705564,0.0013429526,0.00019657942,0.0055928775,0.00059925497,0.6234221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6608191,0.027793052,0.005891324,0.0027734335,0.00023284354,0.00010360243,0.0010367099,0.0002309018,0.3011191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571085,0.0003619585,0.00011108506,0.00039832812,0.0021474813,0.0012703013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957218,0.0007549661,0.00028769847,0.00013824068,0.0018825822,0.0012146335],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279644,0.00090628554,0.0006057985,0.0045130993,0.00825323,0.010413006,0.0008747477,0.0016370892,0.009082359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058797756,0.00074796664,0.0007021517,0.0077320402,0.0053612767,0.0017684324,0.0025244374,0.00441239,0.0008088559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003450561,0.00007832064,0.019005269,0.0005402403,0.00012564156,0.000883456,0.01722709,0.003393133,0.0035506894,0.6083492,0.0809751,0.2655268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031283613,0.00003874537,0.07353223,0.00033937467,0.000028538949,0.00019236321,0.0044014445,0.00069888576,0.0009545879,0.007697629,0.9120229,0.000062035666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17176394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19579186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385197718","doi":"10.7202/1101727ar","title":"Mesure de la proportion de publication en libre accès au Canada, un portrait national","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Political science; Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.1660166282376448,"score_gpt":0.5226730294955413,"score_spread":0.3566564012578965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385197718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49624836,0.0721706,0.0045143175,0.02640954,0.00085026777,0.0002225404,0.1092535,0.0012297271,0.2891011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872689,0.03200813,0.0038773562,0.0015477382,0.0002539535,0.00012128767,0.01857853,0.00028150383,0.07064256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314535,0.0005252836,0.0005640438,0.00080063916,0.00409689,0.00086785475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450126,0.00779076,0.0076953853,0.0014030981,0.03387023,0.0042278348],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031642623,0.00034303745,0.00069589564,0.018400325,0.003325148,0.0056655332,0.00075096916,0.00049964647,0.015328132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024575265,0.00028732678,0.0007107733,0.0456722,0.0013647563,0.0020369715,0.0016699035,0.0009926524,0.0018964651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036895485,0.000039919505,0.5848163,0.0032860325,0.00072149176,0.0005381922,0.01766899,0.0010002955,0.0027388097,0.031135663,0.08116784,0.27651745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011023042,0.000031181105,0.755057,0.0007675242,0.00018261933,0.00035883603,0.008015195,0.0005235473,0.00079932145,0.0008716922,0.23331523,0.0000668544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97346514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99924904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026584866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060983457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1928876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385231643","doi":"10.5296/jse.v13i3.21155","title":"Citation Metrics for Editors of Top-Ranked Journals Related to Higher Education: A Descriptive Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Studies in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Promotion (chess); Productivity; Descriptive statistics; Higher education; Curriculum; Library science; Index (typography); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Descriptive research; Political science; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law; Economic growth; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.7562795425001854,"score_gpt":0.6748119371291061,"score_spread":0.08146760537107922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385231643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99061245,0.0018235488,0.00038004736,0.00026573794,0.0000336412,0.00008879926,0.0048209066,0.00003862397,0.001936318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944957,0.0005683293,0.0006829623,0.00010942893,0.00011215631,0.00015062172,0.0030854726,0.000025320156,0.0007700099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089515,0.0016651176,0.00294398,0.0011010815,0.0029708655,0.00042385972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7653161,0.12028695,0.07978184,0.004677335,0.026173195,0.0037645737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074663195,0.00029965062,0.00081460725,0.01775895,0.0007549645,0.0030177487,0.00078155333,0.0006042223,0.0012509474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084623314,0.00020980186,0.00059836014,0.02162768,0.0009225001,0.0031479718,0.0008948322,0.0006363149,0.0006007915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021217956,0.00011057454,0.98367876,0.0002935095,0.0001464154,0.000112481765,0.002367763,0.00010091641,0.0002781981,0.00034427104,0.0014072128,0.010947825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013374442,0.00023391504,0.98748595,0.000094405,0.00007785632,0.0006038942,0.004768396,0.0003341128,0.00045356728,0.00026038676,0.005640259,0.0000339223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002055938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003846386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014087235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017471695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03948611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385251539","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0070","title":"Combining Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis to Understand the Scholarly Publications on Artificial Intelligence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social network analysis; Rank correlation; Rank (graph theory); Thematic analysis; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Bibliometrics; Network analysis; Test (biology); Data science; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Mathematics; Social capital; Ecology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6468525460429406,"score_gpt":0.5326740116500904,"score_spread":0.1141785343928502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385251539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7559526,0.011210709,0.13203157,0.0026692422,0.00025376378,0.0005497885,0.010010169,0.0009130079,0.08640915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598701,0.0034901414,0.03180973,0.00006721593,0.0002268988,0.00023274809,0.0025029937,0.000043053577,0.0017571102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542516,0.0014914332,0.0005394838,0.0003196211,0.0020494794,0.00017494659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98745745,0.008284991,0.001958928,0.0005704295,0.001530744,0.0001975343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038360676,0.00055786705,0.0008052265,0.0668456,0.00090195105,0.0045460663,0.00052502955,0.00054551626,0.0025049138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019120954,0.00014465713,0.0006286351,0.06301225,0.0006506646,0.0052869604,0.0016176346,0.00039726365,0.0005983265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013190413,0.00029503668,0.4189893,0.0028865752,0.0010290497,0.0003770961,0.0042826603,0.0117623815,0.0043096766,0.048497777,0.0055245617,0.50191385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045695444,0.0002733698,0.65532976,0.0012284156,0.0009351485,0.0011877,0.017883262,0.14281045,0.0073863473,0.10357412,0.0691413,0.0002045199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024580306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039129904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001304562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018454732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020287275},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385340611","doi":"10.18280/i2m.220301","title":"A Systematic Literature Network Analysis: Research Mapping of International Roughness Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instrumentation Mesure Métrologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Network analysis; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5190873366794236,"score_gpt":0.5808078946557572,"score_spread":0.06172055797633358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385340611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45278972,0.11481452,0.20372099,0.012552599,0.0010654723,0.008442964,0.09810892,0.0030918631,0.105413005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7776757,0.030615045,0.15690531,0.00055687764,0.00022280894,0.005998875,0.02215093,0.00022766176,0.005646835],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932411,0.0020086542,0.0013213275,0.0013248776,0.0018171495,0.00028691356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740035,0.013645398,0.0039427015,0.0014405348,0.006402878,0.0005649242],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006708787,0.00082668883,0.0009332524,0.0814801,0.0015291228,0.0042121643,0.0007580962,0.00075261155,0.005626718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036697943,0.00037508336,0.0018392019,0.06500066,0.0007482714,0.0040177205,0.0027781401,0.00046689567,0.0010670847],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036696592,0.00013995203,0.14556777,0.038331732,0.0022747186,0.0010830286,0.010903161,0.0053621605,0.008721269,0.038329348,0.031410787,0.7175091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034586393,0.0006649605,0.31340635,0.036529973,0.012924315,0.0030665537,0.03401638,0.054550353,0.016500466,0.0974848,0.43002582,0.0004842999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026009467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122148795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035479903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385356703","doi":"10.59962/9780774837255-014","title":"“For Canada and for Science”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2714710631668627,"score_gpt":0.38528846530923333,"score_spread":0.11381740214237063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385356703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009869293,0.04928144,0.00048009038,0.07834724,0.0071849884,0.000028699746,0.0008507417,0.00014463607,0.86269516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023815818,0.021500183,0.0009903847,0.021372015,0.0008769232,0.000043199663,0.00042983255,0.00020064636,0.930771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964696,0.000347225,0.000089597655,0.00033517322,0.0018189307,0.00093955896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754936,0.0002448058,0.00006874813,0.00014463502,0.0015663994,0.00042607583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016884329,0.0011927066,0.0007827992,0.0053673345,0.013194357,0.016827857,0.0017107056,0.0064863735,0.046205066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053441254,0.0005902934,0.0005291924,0.011387458,0.009406092,0.0067986134,0.0031502096,0.00751859,0.009778634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001091706,0.0000058141864,0.00016225108,0.00007950526,0.0000053735525,0.00003894371,0.0008388385,0.000051275554,0.000048140868,0.23379414,0.7301439,0.03482094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001925993,9.614049e-7,0.00027341346,0.00010251304,0.0000031851766,0.000017139819,0.00049733114,0.000017841587,0.00003079588,0.007885152,0.9911622,0.0000075272537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9662556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08571363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17769171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62189883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385403304","doi":"10.5057/kansei.10.4_193","title":"Evaluation and Impact of Academic Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6076940962352206,"score_gpt":0.5682545950442355,"score_spread":0.03943950119098516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385403304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972098,0.003236873,0.0008990611,0.0010816492,0.00021207899,0.00009715778,0.001341745,0.00007259488,0.020960815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684,0.0005036732,0.00047480094,0.000028920716,0.00013835395,0.000018909363,0.00076240976,0.000008186385,0.0012248021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810188,0.004877759,0.0021091474,0.00094568613,0.010088743,0.0009598821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.917248,0.031569213,0.011860021,0.0026018496,0.030059455,0.006661414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01237958,0.0006064897,0.00094239594,0.029406618,0.0012511279,0.0067900703,0.0010113386,0.0009650353,0.005743318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07497899,0.00021459516,0.0013433702,0.020467637,0.00093931315,0.0044345334,0.0020198277,0.00072260294,0.0013092496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008837343,0.00093495287,0.8655656,0.00042843752,0.00073594676,0.00030550215,0.0005500664,0.0013420249,0.0012756417,0.0018613272,0.003139747,0.122977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008856613,0.0009216463,0.9759536,0.00014045904,0.0008680925,0.00045429717,0.0019658962,0.008591438,0.0027080488,0.0028799896,0.0053612497,0.00006676103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033798716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003503339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025577643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035003768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06547028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385429858","doi":"10.1021/cen-10125-acsnews2","title":"Announcing the 2023 ACS fellows","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C&EN Global Enterprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Library science; National laboratory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Management; Engineering; Engineering physics; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4022989651191888,"score_gpt":0.5528123228618527,"score_spread":0.1505133577426639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385429858","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003119507,0.006293548,0.0025493624,0.22942424,0.6307393,0.0010893851,0.0028863356,0.0023965263,0.121501766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011684157,0.0074459612,0.0054307957,0.11912185,0.20182966,0.0016264614,0.005244404,0.0012836023,0.64633304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852189,0.0011930069,0.00075624575,0.00092868507,0.009375747,0.0025274605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525781,0.0028716247,0.0023287872,0.0032977026,0.018651612,0.0202721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019289352,0.0019073935,0.0012737936,0.0031096837,0.00669716,0.016363252,0.0028637336,0.01465866,0.12641558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045288358,0.00097092,0.002085104,0.002583917,0.0016240985,0.0050580017,0.007893366,0.010477666,0.1146521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031011718,0.000030581225,0.00022069944,0.00005280042,0.0000023624452,0.00006483052,0.000024972402,0.000013328258,0.00020383154,0.0008852118,0.98196477,0.01650569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010805817,0.000023587221,0.0004369158,0.000052128165,0.0000028195486,0.000033651526,0.00006904095,0.00004876273,0.0001291711,0.00051356346,0.99866843,0.00001116561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00302021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008322636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12641558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030778574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018716555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42290223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385478893","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3102401/v1","title":"Impact of Medical Technologies may be Predicted Using Constructed Graph Bibliometrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Random forest; Computer science; Citation; Pipeline (software); Data science; Machine learning; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Library science","score_opus":0.8155945909264893,"score_gpt":0.6904264773454634,"score_spread":0.12516811358102597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385478893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9105439,0.0027295377,0.061862,0.0027032385,0.00011392103,0.00012890737,0.00827443,0.0012229888,0.0124210175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091387,0.00048519665,0.0062816422,0.00005110632,0.00006226698,0.00003103707,0.0018059851,0.000021309728,0.00034761147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974443,0.0010509916,0.00024950883,0.00028780726,0.0007977559,0.00016974815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656002,0.025713108,0.004941345,0.0012854933,0.00209576,0.00036409992],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005105582,0.00057592045,0.0006230782,0.016638227,0.00030226394,0.002522433,0.0003718641,0.00075239793,0.0021509768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05410483,0.00019219395,0.0006935037,0.013334072,0.00051596627,0.001973791,0.0008074248,0.00058137334,0.0009917647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042408987,0.000249561,0.73906225,0.00039735434,0.0005533847,0.0001863304,0.00015259317,0.08915961,0.0015378242,0.0065589026,0.0051415665,0.15657648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056547866,0.00018658652,0.3165357,0.000173668,0.00021549854,0.00025987855,0.00023253245,0.63560724,0.0040219272,0.037671395,0.0049599875,0.00007920418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035947687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028114845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012995673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008899371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027001262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385503417","doi":"10.59350/642eb-hjq68","title":"Three questions with…. DeDe!","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Profiling (computer programming); World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.8126452199449594,"score_gpt":0.6257314045505707,"score_spread":0.18691381539438867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385503417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011168439,0.0014682317,0.00078346283,0.91312426,0.040424738,0.00005191593,0.00025553672,0.0003565556,0.042418458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016403826,0.0009241932,0.0016990306,0.741769,0.009132584,0.00017290037,0.00029243017,0.00039242618,0.22921363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914745,0.0026210868,0.00044991798,0.0010992716,0.0031154864,0.0012397656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96823746,0.004972135,0.0009843974,0.0014871081,0.0130311195,0.011287672],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009959393,0.0010462397,0.0007454729,0.0010233237,0.011673216,0.0109122805,0.0016521189,0.015501078,0.10061759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052750256,0.0005629392,0.0011054376,0.00085351034,0.0053620217,0.011888672,0.007568056,0.016204247,0.0674014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013380843,0.000015276024,0.00024453155,0.000016429358,0.0000022469412,0.00006472969,0.00054204767,0.0000074693826,0.00007274604,0.0026672443,0.9913703,0.0049835155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008501988,0.00001771882,0.00032181432,0.000060709805,0.0000026009222,0.00015596808,0.0032220264,0.000027526117,0.00010365033,0.002138256,0.99390805,0.000033069828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070533687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010680619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041866507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047699222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33659935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385505067","doi":"10.59350/7d1a0-p6451","title":"Preliminary Findings from the Review, Promotion, and Tenure Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Quarter (Canadian coin); Promotion (chess); Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Business; Psychology; Engineering; Law; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6017909596130846,"score_gpt":0.5807581960482786,"score_spread":0.02103276356480599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385505067","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13908933,0.42222854,0.0107665155,0.17436035,0.008114558,0.0087106265,0.106904075,0.0003299077,0.12949607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5570413,0.2820915,0.022541292,0.037332572,0.0050669694,0.020424036,0.0451527,0.00033104693,0.030018605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96759295,0.0134300385,0.0052044448,0.0022699626,0.0089721335,0.0025305229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64775205,0.22675405,0.033243265,0.008167458,0.07300994,0.0110733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0754837,0.00068133377,0.0016946525,0.016125198,0.0021859277,0.0075372183,0.0011961198,0.0018679634,0.032194264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25085977,0.00060299976,0.0029048508,0.035504453,0.001434077,0.00815641,0.00443776,0.0022568367,0.005528832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031918813,0.0004074326,0.14650871,0.15210293,0.00297097,0.00081175833,0.030320622,0.0005011612,0.0016352058,0.029858405,0.22729996,0.404391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039534224,0.000574995,0.3233531,0.06943879,0.0066032074,0.00071263243,0.04749995,0.00023394066,0.0010011016,0.009802851,0.54025865,0.00012545033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01443213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0328629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005981923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030573895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39920074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385650652","doi":"10.37724/rsu.2023.79.2.007","title":"Enthusiasm as an epistemic virtue in British scientific culture in the second half of the 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th century (illustrated in the works of naturalist J. Banks)","year":2023,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Рязанского государственного университета имени С А Есенина","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Naturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Virtue; Period (music); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Classics; Aesthetics; Theology","score_opus":0.09735117123961488,"score_gpt":0.400459204053362,"score_spread":0.3031080328137471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385650652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3895558,0.034144454,0.0025209174,0.058172584,0.0013167378,0.00003481846,0.000115945826,0.00009553391,0.5140431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716255,0.0024374626,0.00036003476,0.001462532,0.00011668875,0.000018610841,0.000014910967,0.00003632917,0.028390829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941157,0.0027626504,0.00023313986,0.00051869225,0.0013741807,0.0009956065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940399,0.0027955195,0.00064931944,0.0003164962,0.0014025909,0.00079614425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063403365,0.0002996709,0.0005000705,0.0024532063,0.013392019,0.013452263,0.00055586576,0.0032077162,0.00386165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058568865,0.00045034496,0.0002573691,0.0035875516,0.04324018,0.005051999,0.003970265,0.003545206,0.0006605079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110235225,0.00002262101,0.0025861526,0.00015455057,0.00001387881,0.00030505893,0.58179265,0.00008882197,0.0006837755,0.37933266,0.010825261,0.024084317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003259735,0.00008755149,0.021161908,0.0003991567,0.0000166971,0.00041455173,0.12503923,0.00019619649,0.0005474413,0.05349505,0.7984727,0.00013702796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1742406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24281755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98660797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022803986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010386437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34645277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721339","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8235236","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open science; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3505033587503908,"score_gpt":0.4692609809700305,"score_spread":0.1187576222196397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95388424,0.0008375776,0.0006473736,0.010000463,0.000043470543,0.00011355851,0.0021197305,0.000055017572,0.032298595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969085,0.00016637836,0.00025884973,0.00020975388,0.000015076736,0.00003165436,0.0004049483,0.000018510971,0.0019863523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636355,0.0070745153,0.0019978348,0.0029451058,0.018395122,0.005951984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68134767,0.15246955,0.05140698,0.011179125,0.07692201,0.02667468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025343934,0.00020520636,0.0007155614,0.0063123545,0.008554064,0.008421526,0.0025765356,0.0019407314,0.004768008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20232438,0.0003309377,0.00056147046,0.017830266,0.00433338,0.0038021328,0.0057571917,0.002659153,0.00064188545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037065562,0.00029122463,0.90273315,0.00016030857,0.00020896558,0.00020261094,0.028169088,0.0017315076,0.00059647975,0.013515675,0.01060414,0.041416086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042847085,0.00008443945,0.9447541,0.00015938246,0.00017656153,0.00005904873,0.033158842,0.0030436453,0.0006339171,0.002619337,0.015195261,0.00007254132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93856525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9518562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99742347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043273285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3139711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094300","doi":"10.1101/2023.08.21.554192","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4728235389757298,"score_gpt":0.4649523744110101,"score_spread":0.007871164564719701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885627,0.0021030647,0.00049313565,0.0018530397,0.00020964384,0.000045769488,0.0003440258,0.000023458013,0.0063651153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764365,0.00041677261,0.00020944404,0.00031769057,0.00009787523,0.000016255699,0.00009125916,0.000009726774,0.0011973258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992183,0.0031330045,0.0010256193,0.0008501503,0.001858496,0.0009497249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436451,0.023083836,0.02335454,0.0025373916,0.0028861177,0.0044930065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074299127,0.00025895817,0.00044704985,0.001875755,0.0015058797,0.001958956,0.0005988103,0.0006329779,0.011669163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052352898,0.0002464024,0.00032100812,0.0020011084,0.0006554777,0.001252443,0.0015117675,0.0005878802,0.0010395205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003035675,0.00033620113,0.9600361,0.00021058651,0.000107458436,0.0005320525,0.008437387,0.000044009095,0.0011758261,0.00086450094,0.0023527308,0.025599562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024276698,0.00025414422,0.983714,0.00023601262,0.000041392144,0.0007119879,0.007647648,0.00015390491,0.0005318208,0.0020318164,0.0046270946,0.000026059506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023295525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003612548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99812424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053121033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017203367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039293587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386229488","doi":"10.51983/ajist-2014.4.2.104","title":"Bibliometric Study of Chemistry Literature in North Eastern Hill University During 2000 to 2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Subject (documents); Web of science; Computer science; Chemistry; Information retrieval; Mathematics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.07813479159987156,"score_gpt":0.3942982617843896,"score_spread":0.316163470184518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386229488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96928096,0.0057105767,0.00013593158,0.000504315,0.000035653426,0.00009592481,0.010962837,0.000044653276,0.013229169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751583,0.0071545844,0.00049549964,0.0000848546,0.00012773133,0.00012570358,0.011771507,0.000012948613,0.0050687487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972109,0.00022890427,0.0004934666,0.00021385524,0.0015995379,0.00025343458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913708,0.0024434952,0.0026723866,0.00019512673,0.0028560704,0.00046211123],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015591899,0.00022275443,0.0005593686,0.04652216,0.0010112652,0.0020252399,0.00052291865,0.0003089828,0.0022716692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008961284,0.00016387952,0.0003367375,0.08080105,0.00040223973,0.0012375732,0.0011417908,0.00020507825,0.0005855319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018598823,0.00014735264,0.8804873,0.0027379477,0.00015157668,0.0017118654,0.0076305447,0.000604991,0.0014109133,0.0013729386,0.008362993,0.095195584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025937122,0.000030326071,0.9854515,0.00015017328,0.00004290011,0.0003593459,0.0035902425,0.00034557446,0.00049363694,0.00007127283,0.009451351,0.000011069339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029322688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049535472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95347786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003958967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042778165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05830401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386371418","doi":"10.1093/cje/bead021","title":"The interdisciplinarity of economics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reputation; Positive economics; Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Odds; Citation; Social science; Sociology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5418026054333259,"score_gpt":0.5292018174333343,"score_spread":0.012600787999991647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386371418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55059505,0.050588116,0.052044347,0.10379241,0.00089156197,0.000068796675,0.00039154277,0.00016688289,0.24146128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932209,0.0028267552,0.0018979231,0.00081427547,0.00024299207,0.000010093606,0.000035734844,0.000012888748,0.0009384265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902893,0.006046351,0.00049376464,0.0010237341,0.0028782596,0.00052897533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9386196,0.029703142,0.009521185,0.006569145,0.011112958,0.004474012],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010461101,0.00014998192,0.0005250513,0.0054566734,0.0020723715,0.008481721,0.0006658286,0.0009280891,0.0032906279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032150183,0.0001704739,0.0002706618,0.0064470666,0.008020799,0.006565904,0.0048769447,0.0015556677,0.0005024526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005575344,0.00005936485,0.086871766,0.0005562186,0.0001785739,0.00036958014,0.010485851,0.0018616482,0.0010226798,0.7450639,0.007233799,0.14624095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012593153,0.000036630572,0.056003634,0.000656611,0.000030409312,0.00035855008,0.008340981,0.0016682551,0.00037037118,0.8420547,0.09043407,0.000033156655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013445716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015139941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003249724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034961714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055324256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386402131","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y","title":"The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Elite; China; Humanities; Social science; Citation analysis; Political science; Sociology; Citation; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8933759979167228,"score_gpt":0.6993538977340414,"score_spread":0.1940221001826814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386402131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97014743,0.0035951156,0.0009362575,0.0010528022,0.00006818038,0.000030516036,0.0011100355,0.00008637444,0.022973161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989367,0.00027582308,0.00015756657,0.000017355802,0.00004715232,0.0000055694954,0.00022633308,0.000005787874,0.00032775616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748296,0.0005211221,0.0002509925,0.0003364014,0.0011048849,0.00030364766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96004474,0.022692004,0.007790168,0.0019751564,0.0050098766,0.0024880925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954055,0.00022035892,0.00069686456,0.016517438,0.0011502616,0.0020432353,0.00062776543,0.0003316044,0.0037187184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027218329,0.00011289982,0.000763743,0.02006832,0.0024266439,0.002019402,0.0018571165,0.00054805074,0.00027730296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007810246,0.000020822066,0.96041024,0.00020800326,0.0002545145,0.00020424504,0.0010199886,0.0006354549,0.00019690272,0.0134429755,0.0018303955,0.021698419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008750542,0.00004046391,0.9917657,0.00004350104,0.00019450982,0.0000855607,0.0014627523,0.0014106521,0.00016982575,0.0019094888,0.0028944358,0.000014423876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037097733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038664494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99604595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002759111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00459288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07376355},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4386457599","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8344124422224187,"score_gpt":0.607260966353585,"score_spread":0.22715147586883377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386457599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98298925,0.0030479038,0.0009413159,0.0030486567,0.0002542822,0.000055038137,0.00043447767,0.00003593847,0.009193096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962829,0.0008154094,0.00035987687,0.0004915531,0.00012469364,0.000020475336,0.00014598462,0.0000151972845,0.0017440041],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030274,0.0036800434,0.0013014966,0.001190566,0.0023357002,0.0011894124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556892,0.019178778,0.01619077,0.0026989272,0.0025880064,0.003654362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009622935,0.00025025307,0.0005847945,0.0025314386,0.0015008907,0.001905975,0.0005594805,0.0005825703,0.008024799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05592627,0.00022793352,0.00032868673,0.003070593,0.0007844353,0.001496954,0.0017263531,0.0005085495,0.00089779054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048826964,0.000296578,0.9165681,0.00032126898,0.0001675557,0.00074145885,0.015041573,0.000075322954,0.0018708268,0.0022470462,0.003600175,0.05858201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038141272,0.00024750535,0.97219175,0.00025505025,0.00006229447,0.0007936216,0.010845892,0.00018770066,0.0008003664,0.0049646236,0.009576277,0.000036863366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030755086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005460818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063447974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017824813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05089152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386457741","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.1","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8519097049606796,"score_gpt":0.613279302837462,"score_spread":0.23863040212321762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386457741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887666,0.0017771531,0.0005134858,0.0019961502,0.00016887182,0.00003343482,0.00035436702,0.000022717002,0.0063671293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978728,0.00033544184,0.0001992439,0.00028118055,0.00008325509,0.000010849716,0.0001047852,0.000008404063,0.0011040019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916746,0.0032632542,0.0010530975,0.0009688894,0.0020033913,0.001036833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453245,0.023675371,0.020727163,0.002823815,0.003109104,0.004340017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007710624,0.00021167818,0.00049091515,0.0022789652,0.0013278257,0.001811734,0.00052680715,0.0005298569,0.010908298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054162737,0.00019200859,0.00029887084,0.0026140322,0.0006862558,0.0012336898,0.0014913965,0.0005347765,0.00097288314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003794574,0.00029372083,0.9541616,0.00019580622,0.00013267044,0.00046526888,0.0067495643,0.000053852826,0.0013790564,0.0014124869,0.0026694967,0.032107074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029357729,0.00020923428,0.98279613,0.00016468814,0.00004176305,0.0005393997,0.0068695396,0.00015843086,0.000648452,0.003480518,0.005038261,0.00002415532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023534298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038834785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005447971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014027028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386460583","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.1.sa3","title":"Reviewer #1 (Public Review): Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Elite; Psychological intervention; Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7978525289254812,"score_gpt":0.6060095791438209,"score_spread":0.19184294978166028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386460583","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033511922,0.006994316,0.004147639,0.4820409,0.49113342,0.0029873308,0.0023435657,0.0014197489,0.0055819764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05352791,0.009243904,0.0106911445,0.61350745,0.25973538,0.010266831,0.0014961633,0.0013785432,0.040152717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451706,0.018340737,0.011636272,0.006432822,0.016452324,0.0019672646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4497605,0.06308853,0.025622949,0.016321711,0.4329291,0.012277227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05974389,0.0025518031,0.0031559274,0.0037969472,0.0053216345,0.006742323,0.005360804,0.015484787,0.025644364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33918768,0.0012709801,0.0026731472,0.0020056122,0.0037545057,0.0040886346,0.0031049468,0.008070107,0.014755077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022825699,0.00003313686,0.0031811057,0.0026547909,0.0001307526,0.0003230882,0.0007292263,0.00007687238,0.000502708,0.0004000499,0.9761692,0.015570793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006298399,0.00019720997,0.0122907795,0.006963589,0.00050532765,0.0013724458,0.0030053514,0.0014260287,0.0023053985,0.0037744977,0.96721655,0.0003129931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006987442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010404066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99620306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006728567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020181684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3159597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386533659","doi":"10.1101/2023.09.07.23295220","title":"Computational Methods for Characterizing Research Outputs, Collaborative Networks and Thematic Concentration: a Case Study in Primary Care Research Evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Mainstream; Thematic map; Thematic analysis; Altmetrics; Social network analysis; Computer science; Scopus; Data science; Information retrieval; Citation; Collaborative network; Social media; Library science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Knowledge management; Social science; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Cartography","score_opus":0.8561601359466112,"score_gpt":0.7083878490509442,"score_spread":0.14777228689566702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386533659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.621543,0.004232411,0.33293808,0.008709033,0.00010496767,0.0032720477,0.0042011864,0.00046913495,0.024530027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80566376,0.0007964273,0.19084954,0.00019826081,0.000058323436,0.0011297617,0.0006759984,0.000052172356,0.0005757437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95691514,0.03349041,0.0022728983,0.0015570237,0.0052091554,0.0005553466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7513604,0.21504812,0.014181033,0.00701101,0.01109042,0.0013089161],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043377947,0.00063194503,0.0006497682,0.0127933845,0.0015052961,0.0062663206,0.0014103075,0.0010894088,0.0019996206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15476708,0.0003592599,0.0011118095,0.01949318,0.0017800641,0.0030569462,0.0030623844,0.0009155833,0.00023705866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064745476,0.00079666247,0.40208706,0.0043086233,0.00086049805,0.001732748,0.01858425,0.055743694,0.0018440452,0.075454324,0.0077085323,0.43023208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020553202,0.0006446133,0.228974,0.0022993255,0.0005442217,0.0015544273,0.030773787,0.5814876,0.004261473,0.11783014,0.031211967,0.00021295705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012538259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015745223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98720664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050331466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060666697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22940725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387014740","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04837-9","title":"An analysis of international mobility and research productivity in computer science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; China; Scopus; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Political science; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.707261089982269,"score_gpt":0.6701808773690084,"score_spread":0.037080212613260555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387014740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914328,0.00078447175,0.0017280605,0.00034278992,0.000012033958,0.000012167569,0.0011723421,0.000025128544,0.004490184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989041,0.0001624427,0.00023476673,0.0000051955394,0.000011428753,0.0000066457596,0.00041108156,0.0000034722984,0.00026079285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907047,0.00030610728,0.000087257205,0.00013715736,0.00019238052,0.00020660725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685986,0.004991467,0.0053820983,0.00055290596,0.0012039564,0.0010096974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014532882,0.00020432252,0.00033859623,0.0072822105,0.00057069905,0.0017237862,0.0003791938,0.0003490128,0.0028982137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013593584,0.00008844728,0.00039469523,0.014594335,0.0005998983,0.0017661933,0.0016852467,0.00042496176,0.00047466872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568575,0.0000519972,0.95959646,0.000092219954,0.00020102524,0.0002737695,0.001641746,0.005394323,0.0003365313,0.0052349027,0.001309832,0.025710428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012210123,0.00012692662,0.9651339,0.00010611451,0.00009320611,0.0003880399,0.0077216583,0.013318115,0.00045875908,0.0048909388,0.0077210222,0.000029152978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070026717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050602215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000831327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005278785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013923824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387091624","doi":"10.54590/pop.2023.014","title":"Le libre accès dans les sciences humaines au Canada: une conversation","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.7960548915239892,"score_gpt":0.581729472973685,"score_spread":0.21432541855030418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387091624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01659744,0.017567683,0.0018147668,0.8994794,0.0019801229,0.00002638617,0.00027639116,0.00005383004,0.062203854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5950312,0.037588574,0.0037988478,0.2804312,0.0038452588,0.000097648895,0.00020457717,0.00040427703,0.07859847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97398436,0.0059142495,0.0008504689,0.002019535,0.011954229,0.0052771475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9113362,0.05056225,0.0026174388,0.0017232684,0.023454158,0.010306728],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031067254,0.00067921827,0.0016073571,0.006125994,0.043047935,0.044301175,0.003678287,0.023732882,0.018131206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05891472,0.0012367882,0.0008229406,0.014170395,0.03867003,0.019321056,0.011803278,0.01911444,0.0012889041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020762019,0.0001102722,0.0043522944,0.0009446623,0.000067135195,0.00116774,0.15216033,0.0005646429,0.0010871084,0.5321849,0.24230058,0.0648528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037063408,0.000016389075,0.0037828332,0.0011515747,0.000048967573,0.00012781407,0.08795763,0.00040305048,0.00043736596,0.022510564,0.88338655,0.00014014849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99632174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19652426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26859742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93191797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387116974","doi":"10.15626/mp.2023.4020","title":"A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta-Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Publication; Reproducibility; Psychology; Applied psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.9415478893122667,"score_gpt":0.728999741796331,"score_spread":0.21254814751593576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387116974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16950063,0.011853951,0.30242503,0.40428355,0.011116609,0.005280228,0.0046818834,0.0045113065,0.08634672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6713202,0.0017863726,0.27316284,0.028763667,0.004095686,0.0086593665,0.002677768,0.0019311648,0.0076029627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5630577,0.33005822,0.029419817,0.02065004,0.054247007,0.0025671422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07288624,0.6141971,0.04933104,0.19149719,0.06354548,0.008542958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.356274,0.0009302802,0.0021699641,0.019737074,0.0068056304,0.01593093,0.004371066,0.007262245,0.014644451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87048244,0.0018282988,0.0042012124,0.027060464,0.011156007,0.019235782,0.01233319,0.0062864637,0.0072284676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019658024,0.0009019883,0.34546542,0.0020257882,0.003931458,0.00023790973,0.010100324,0.0021351844,0.0018126192,0.05235286,0.163737,0.41533354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014891045,0.0018717266,0.24560155,0.0031106987,0.0026030699,0.001470241,0.009667027,0.028212842,0.004261259,0.5341464,0.16677444,0.0007915418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017608259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022650536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.643726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035043494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006893505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7938287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387130658","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.140810.1","title":"The SCOPE framework – implementing the ideals of responsible research assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research England; Newcastle University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Open peer review; Plant biology; Engineering ethics; Physiology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Biology; Computer science; Engineering; Botany; Programming language","score_opus":0.938691784200287,"score_gpt":0.7806215576158355,"score_spread":0.15807022658445147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387130658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052321367,0.004964253,0.6161803,0.11532379,0.0016264077,0.0047597596,0.00021483393,0.0006099274,0.25108856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17431585,0.0043476894,0.7811991,0.015332408,0.00067135505,0.010271948,0.000255606,0.0004106127,0.013195361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.58677053,0.34848332,0.015346112,0.010744416,0.033279225,0.0053763906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6783665,0.22073315,0.010017195,0.03142598,0.047852322,0.011604839],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33947667,0.001707279,0.0018832684,0.009358233,0.009381656,0.027990546,0.0051573473,0.010492799,0.004720181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20494561,0.0017176191,0.0027222575,0.005365912,0.07534396,0.02705661,0.020863496,0.011169934,0.0024792498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018227109,0.000036814192,0.00038176123,0.00060619286,0.000025228484,0.00007040227,0.011691228,0.000629383,0.00017147584,0.95027,0.006286069,0.02981324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054822085,0.00008078684,0.00041982572,0.0032711078,0.000026139029,0.00012584397,0.0064379196,0.00085763476,0.00031806677,0.86088496,0.12746787,0.000054992157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072438587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078821415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021089261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12678291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8145429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387276382","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104895","title":"Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Homophily; Citation; Disadvantage; Gender gap; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.8735278668469351,"score_gpt":0.6882343069839548,"score_spread":0.18529355986298024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387276382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97148806,0.00079770136,0.0013345493,0.0039338903,0.000053822743,0.00001320025,0.00018213592,0.000008216343,0.022188433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990386,0.00008641768,0.00008520498,0.00013031246,0.000044867804,0.000003687972,0.000026651047,0.0000029132943,0.0005814327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610955,0.002054751,0.00021275172,0.0003502537,0.0007895305,0.0004830738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608112,0.025905661,0.0063716723,0.0019843592,0.0019309617,0.0029961274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062367744,0.00015042821,0.00046737638,0.0024548548,0.0015938219,0.0030915798,0.00038282236,0.0011141202,0.0123263495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037854165,0.000078466015,0.00022451075,0.0029687113,0.0014678534,0.0020215933,0.0013786369,0.0007649212,0.00058812904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010418603,0.00048737036,0.86052907,0.00020012075,0.0002975737,0.0005055461,0.010738946,0.000758713,0.001634096,0.046721842,0.0040071704,0.07307764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010478379,0.00056267536,0.83593136,0.00016226785,0.0003024564,0.00097209105,0.031249115,0.0028017045,0.0020545567,0.11416102,0.011645792,0.000052189556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002164222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040389653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006449325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069923716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041235805},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4387334126","doi":"10.26443/seismica.v2i2.1091","title":"Editorial workflow of a community-led, all-volunteer scientific journal: lessons from the launch of Seismica","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seismica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Workflow; Ethos; Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Political science; Computer security; Physics","score_opus":0.5002007100344366,"score_gpt":0.5435157531541576,"score_spread":0.04331504311972101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13027033,0.0056366567,0.19880623,0.37764388,0.058498625,0.0050937957,0.0042229877,0.046543352,0.17328413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3952511,0.0040073525,0.4521931,0.02146702,0.022627654,0.0026889138,0.0047907154,0.015218569,0.08175557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8576264,0.072302,0.01311163,0.009695554,0.041480415,0.005784038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.410587,0.201157,0.02840134,0.10331988,0.15484866,0.10168613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18228078,0.0011345797,0.0014793834,0.007266581,0.017228844,0.035812568,0.0050250036,0.00444346,0.014082086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34049806,0.0015744114,0.0013936356,0.0079679135,0.007553222,0.015678404,0.010894854,0.008536857,0.018937241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007880837,0.00082573405,0.009467352,0.0010922264,0.00012805342,0.0024330842,0.028036036,0.0020459082,0.00535938,0.037570912,0.48277503,0.4294782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002857753,0.0003503931,0.0068444083,0.0005255382,0.00004211565,0.0010099148,0.014264387,0.0044476846,0.001778452,0.037063826,0.93293965,0.00044794334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007510346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014262627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96418744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00939823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05393248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387363035","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0292306","title":"Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rating scale; Reliability (semiconductor); Quality (philosophy); Index (typography); Publication bias; Rating system; Actuarial science; Medicine; Statistics; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Economics; Confidence interval","score_opus":0.9369708358436797,"score_gpt":0.6706692369424758,"score_spread":0.26630159890120386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387363035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76589,0.018639797,0.13650802,0.010055352,0.0041650045,0.010386889,0.0018319493,0.0013982052,0.051124815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326555,0.0022449296,0.057914183,0.0005611882,0.0013648466,0.002038914,0.0005084007,0.00015893426,0.0025530204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.39561337,0.447984,0.04729957,0.013053979,0.09128327,0.004765891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14199652,0.6089586,0.10154871,0.0363196,0.10589206,0.005284422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40952042,0.0010475751,0.0035076996,0.017602807,0.0025757295,0.008039392,0.0027966325,0.0014281715,0.003072402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7272109,0.0005962674,0.0018865311,0.01831615,0.0037112,0.004694171,0.004679732,0.0016252882,0.0018445353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047633685,0.0004103593,0.1848096,0.0076970146,0.0018139413,0.00036406648,0.009490836,0.0055146255,0.004280432,0.013088563,0.016421081,0.7513461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002257821,0.008006838,0.7201316,0.0053763418,0.002864321,0.0025120464,0.011428992,0.082573876,0.016711716,0.0764975,0.07003544,0.0016036493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018019635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003373634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037831925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063585495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72816646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387475799","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.09.008","title":"Are papers in Evolution &amp; Human Behavior easy? A review of Scientific Papers Made Easy: How to Write with Clarity and Impact in the Life Sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Psychology; Cognitive science; Biology","score_opus":0.6014104113581248,"score_gpt":0.5760013368549654,"score_spread":0.025409074503159434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387475799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030323997,0.95985216,0.0007864839,0.027986951,0.008223468,0.00009381197,0.00017428759,0.00003729757,0.0025422561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050055594,0.97069573,0.0044392715,0.009190579,0.008143004,0.00019502101,0.00018993337,0.000057507805,0.0020834105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410519,0.023301162,0.01264339,0.0019009687,0.0202669,0.0008357006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61280257,0.22431684,0.046780054,0.006185873,0.10308231,0.0068323785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048824593,0.001352315,0.0044627856,0.022130426,0.0017256555,0.01603269,0.0016269223,0.004601901,0.00665067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.263897,0.0012774008,0.0024732111,0.023457572,0.0027466554,0.011692822,0.002219097,0.0036309578,0.0033779254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001584209,0.00008303332,0.0019463445,0.0923218,0.0023834982,0.00022777013,0.0008205693,0.00011340905,0.0007067866,0.0057804366,0.22372879,0.67172915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013085708,0.00011864746,0.0073704007,0.123804726,0.0029207866,0.00049097685,0.0009438652,0.00011092084,0.00050421734,0.011586232,0.8519038,0.000114520764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043798634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010865378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044739367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019339781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2582122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387496759","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103703","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of negative publications from orthopedics and traumatology from the ten most influential journals of 2009–2010 and 2019–2020: A comparative study with the “Orthopedics &amp; Traumatology: Surgery &amp; Research” journal, using the same analysis of submitted and accepted articles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Orthopedic surgery; Medicine; General surgery; Surgery","score_opus":0.7620079873526839,"score_gpt":0.5966025595515161,"score_spread":0.16540542780116785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387496759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613132,0.013454023,0.00051779114,0.0007800326,0.00017904419,0.000071811126,0.013849768,0.00008412482,0.009750273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842365,0.0038018024,0.00044553392,0.000047351772,0.00023570789,0.00004503307,0.006360382,0.000017919188,0.0006226948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98368686,0.002311126,0.0041693132,0.0008869482,0.0082865385,0.0006591943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9329935,0.026145106,0.020038653,0.002526815,0.016100215,0.0021956898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009100784,0.0006571744,0.0017262264,0.08097668,0.0012310141,0.0048975935,0.0011009114,0.00085935456,0.0020500713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051966425,0.0002204167,0.0020360027,0.09809624,0.0011925385,0.0026023746,0.0021945138,0.00047629426,0.0006693744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004051456,0.00012923269,0.951355,0.0030561427,0.001700423,0.00035092505,0.0014786322,0.00043710598,0.00090482325,0.0007222673,0.0026260535,0.03683432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020532716,0.000099136014,0.98970443,0.00022413823,0.0010142605,0.00058720267,0.0019735114,0.000535945,0.0005677413,0.0002201735,0.0050272713,0.000025576439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055850977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007712689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002177273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045095594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048130095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387504686","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102236","title":"Converting to Open Access in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Journal: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Obstetrics and gynaecology; Publishing; Bibliometrics; Medicine; China; Gynecology; Citation analysis; Library science; Obstetrics; Political science; Pregnancy; Computer science; Citation; Biology","score_opus":0.33587934064638963,"score_gpt":0.5104311862779564,"score_spread":0.17455184563156673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387504686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8230398,0.01377809,0.003909474,0.003604785,0.0009620941,0.0021555386,0.075427204,0.00046023424,0.0766627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507373,0.0064326534,0.007043585,0.0004949999,0.0007168383,0.0007364243,0.027497206,0.00020438388,0.0061364835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94595706,0.008613594,0.008448773,0.0027388975,0.032192994,0.002048741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8330163,0.07336433,0.020220187,0.0113851605,0.05816157,0.0038524796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01486876,0.0005765493,0.0023107633,0.08414539,0.002204042,0.012374894,0.0016343957,0.0009740267,0.009798878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21693565,0.00039951236,0.0029698308,0.20975685,0.0016435408,0.0045371437,0.005098089,0.0014042524,0.0022952722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088830787,0.000577966,0.640501,0.005653026,0.0027584615,0.00042530728,0.008211268,0.0016700961,0.0010663635,0.008777818,0.031377006,0.29809326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010204977,0.00019791168,0.9392306,0.0009603471,0.0016266789,0.00039049043,0.008001913,0.0016801761,0.000848658,0.0036579375,0.043199845,0.00010329604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08059578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07025231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064758104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015220715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16025335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387703401","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2023.1274290","title":"The top 100 most cited articles in helical tomotherapy: a scoping review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Jilin University","keywords":"Tomotherapy; Citation; Bibliometrics; Radiation oncology; Science Citation Index; Medical physics; Medicine; Web of science; Library science; Oncology; Radiation therapy; Internal medicine; Computer science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.7200389510255907,"score_gpt":0.6698379028857864,"score_spread":0.050201048139804305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387703401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027413042,0.9908744,0.00082294125,0.001180304,0.00051267515,0.0008121225,0.0012274026,0.000034575954,0.0017942671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012556594,0.98158675,0.002368548,0.0005969147,0.00034539064,0.001130207,0.001020505,0.000024607343,0.0003704257],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.97929275,0.0045308573,0.00950466,0.001331832,0.004765614,0.0005742657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9143891,0.055573717,0.012990993,0.0010122568,0.015267016,0.00076697173],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018916996,0.0025470753,0.0076078204,0.07088848,0.0023814202,0.0077049853,0.0026201273,0.0035988018,0.007724982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09697513,0.0016358388,0.006610854,0.05726748,0.0014282764,0.0057017235,0.0030007702,0.0014790588,0.001716935],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031607773,0.00005547731,0.0024729487,0.7983425,0.0028103434,0.0005513989,0.0010109645,0.00030908396,0.00075051776,0.0010486294,0.00772314,0.18460892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006524268,0.00013627589,0.005290613,0.92853254,0.01712477,0.00081977283,0.0015513367,0.00021638535,0.00073339493,0.0011021375,0.044363745,0.000063753156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073547573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013087238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92911154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018965153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10004383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387704100","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2023-0113","title":"Exploring international collaboration and language dynamics in Digital Humanities: insights from co-authorship networks in canonical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Centrality; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Multilingualism; Publishing; Social science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.554330087267495,"score_gpt":0.5669016626813276,"score_spread":0.01257157541383258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387704100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97133464,0.0025950503,0.00496036,0.00074500334,0.000044397537,0.00005048616,0.0012716961,0.00003893058,0.018959627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700326,0.0005339747,0.0013864179,0.000029425604,0.000030612788,0.000028824805,0.00031734287,0.000014523162,0.0006556092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711037,0.0011651057,0.00036562065,0.0004621162,0.0006325799,0.0002642012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587877,0.022785818,0.01182917,0.001847698,0.003368008,0.0013816557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035195097,0.00022210208,0.0003564699,0.017293822,0.0014385298,0.0062588598,0.000485894,0.00037358812,0.004222479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029607452,0.00013313483,0.00025640533,0.029800612,0.0019818603,0.006576506,0.0035428687,0.0004447853,0.0005392318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015874255,0.00005886029,0.8042381,0.0010075333,0.00015638584,0.00066727446,0.059445914,0.001222103,0.0019045671,0.027532611,0.0016886956,0.10191918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001569608,0.000094969444,0.745065,0.0007597088,0.00012582727,0.001561772,0.16822773,0.0044259173,0.0021216897,0.031847756,0.045672715,0.00008137558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042082565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007344818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99648046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016495365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016608333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01861316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860045","doi":"10.1002/pra2.809","title":"“I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Equity (law); Public relations; Thematic analysis; Scholarly communication; Reflexivity; Political science; Discipline; Open access publishing; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.4761555824217794,"score_gpt":0.5349972851587399,"score_spread":0.05884170273696049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97410494,0.00095273234,0.0006697967,0.0078247,0.00006118232,0.00005091146,0.000064849155,0.000008036633,0.016262949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860483,0.00026448318,0.00016116007,0.0004010513,0.000014112583,0.000014470282,0.000019023057,0.000004302035,0.0005165784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97920144,0.0086953575,0.0013117783,0.0010976479,0.0065103793,0.0031834366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9284353,0.038337227,0.015161833,0.0017559215,0.007861587,0.008448155],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020852648,0.00021302867,0.00058443064,0.0033407502,0.0113373,0.00926266,0.0015466248,0.0010239269,0.004893558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06788553,0.00024136322,0.0004610654,0.0039047715,0.012527808,0.0046187704,0.007512355,0.0026502952,0.00021031559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112272115,0.00021806486,0.40619773,0.0003670926,0.00009211784,0.0005780092,0.5394886,0.00009330597,0.00040227018,0.0149355065,0.002621188,0.03489376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012246876,0.000040490595,0.17510954,0.00061100593,0.000046711943,0.00033570558,0.80672765,0.00030346785,0.00025499586,0.006695971,0.009812846,0.00004937685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23743887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30410138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015045117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02826682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4721136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860424","doi":"10.1002/pra2.879","title":"Storytelling for Translational Research Impact","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University","keywords":"Storytelling; Craft; Narrative; Plot (graphics); Translational research; Session (web analytics); Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; World Wide Web; Literature; Medicine","score_opus":0.43981751900481403,"score_gpt":0.5726669811555516,"score_spread":0.13284946215073756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057025753,0.0061347187,0.35159358,0.17122093,0.01293103,0.007848643,0.0049417755,0.0059696776,0.38233387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4710237,0.0052367137,0.42092082,0.015994703,0.0033772965,0.016820768,0.0030056236,0.0022545832,0.061365828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559321,0.038299248,0.0011282805,0.0010977486,0.0026908172,0.0008517634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82602453,0.13990046,0.005084283,0.011994538,0.010993453,0.0060027423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047575038,0.0013723575,0.000674267,0.003011086,0.005983415,0.012192766,0.0025941038,0.0026708574,0.05030032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12661067,0.000584512,0.0010592494,0.001963738,0.0052212127,0.011682263,0.013826195,0.006178439,0.00813658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005513517,0.00025470587,0.0014546991,0.002919898,0.00006994312,0.00088489486,0.2500278,0.001417286,0.004513254,0.16336146,0.26585916,0.30868554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014780447,0.00019409716,0.00071178534,0.0025061176,0.000055307977,0.0003499578,0.05566466,0.0017491216,0.0027318273,0.083920635,0.8518887,0.000079922575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004446329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008546628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95242494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048835236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004674187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2516039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387900619","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvad099","title":"Open Access publishing: benefits and challenges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing","score_opus":0.8294517986159284,"score_gpt":0.5683196420842168,"score_spread":0.2611321565317116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387900619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012171592,0.04619031,0.0047102254,0.8600596,0.012301058,0.000046795685,0.0002047924,0.00017953664,0.075090416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18927392,0.25437552,0.025101326,0.28652015,0.15115635,0.00052686624,0.0010061774,0.001123364,0.0909164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9387272,0.023508586,0.0032469288,0.0052022105,0.026109688,0.0032053785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7540535,0.15674284,0.0075593004,0.01585207,0.03740134,0.028391004],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07992119,0.0010532371,0.0017431423,0.005281013,0.007661762,0.04748543,0.00485964,0.022346394,0.04254909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16930616,0.00071733486,0.001299969,0.0070242668,0.027203523,0.0675688,0.017902927,0.021273578,0.016948821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057145586,0.000058475875,0.00038188815,0.00068501726,0.000021509448,0.00023386035,0.0010541847,0.00021250028,0.00008992295,0.6837176,0.20545785,0.10803011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016792917,0.00003418656,0.00048350432,0.0018390054,0.000008476298,0.00046501996,0.0017551242,0.00031725233,0.00006913018,0.35648724,0.6384791,0.00004513121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002288523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002460355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064156493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019632421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4226687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387937804","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04846-8","title":"Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Balance (ability); Term (time); Technological change; Scientific literature; Computer science; Psychology; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.8337135587900643,"score_gpt":0.7017474832136088,"score_spread":0.13196607557645545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387937804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595787,0.0016210881,0.0026925304,0.0011689691,0.000028725348,0.000036568992,0.0001596747,0.000060434835,0.034653287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985581,0.00027444618,0.00039340058,0.000041744315,0.000029497363,0.000008775154,0.000049144295,0.0000095305,0.00063529366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743767,0.0051565887,0.0008893992,0.0011760914,0.0045400145,0.0008002024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7713343,0.15393285,0.035196193,0.009843133,0.020766396,0.00892721],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010869181,0.0003001945,0.0005899494,0.0059886244,0.0013362749,0.009910679,0.0007691764,0.001895118,0.0066628726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09189845,0.0003148084,0.0006264876,0.006841555,0.0018167598,0.0048811655,0.0035757413,0.0015538527,0.0016527537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006381955,0.0008782921,0.8768485,0.00033270652,0.0006827287,0.0009707419,0.00304751,0.00569342,0.009302886,0.018369613,0.0009974468,0.08223791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007862852,0.0004197,0.93649083,0.00009810146,0.00028862205,0.0006246115,0.004695638,0.005845483,0.004325749,0.042217877,0.0048322584,0.00008247871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009548773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097429304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016471839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017112114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05748236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388106222","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04854-8","title":"Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"China; Publication; Index (typography); Citation; Science Citation Index; Library science; Sample (material); Citation index; Order (exchange); Publishing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Law","score_opus":0.7616037686334712,"score_gpt":0.6142861649481008,"score_spread":0.1473176036853704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388106222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99554354,0.00027674032,0.00010193308,0.0006297418,0.000010640092,0.000020884127,0.0003252859,0.000009546926,0.0030815771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983525,0.0000931881,0.00007606248,0.00004780937,0.000023627392,0.000011576633,0.00027281008,0.0000049027385,0.0011175275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944131,0.0008371205,0.0006549413,0.00046161588,0.0025309895,0.0011022867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93757665,0.019500734,0.015669238,0.0016058485,0.010322684,0.015324948],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00835312,0.00025940768,0.0005850089,0.0072774454,0.0017625609,0.0035882744,0.0011916454,0.0008910537,0.0035504268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034696132,0.00024253187,0.00047817169,0.0076279608,0.0008519032,0.0022566263,0.0021757497,0.00076979713,0.0005837526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029890955,0.0001903318,0.95455104,0.00018509234,0.000055928158,0.00035643202,0.0049427813,0.00029477928,0.0010167151,0.0013642199,0.0019672906,0.034776527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015803793,0.00010675515,0.9928646,0.000015974672,0.000020179537,0.00006938142,0.0038921398,0.00074368314,0.00026022192,0.0003966817,0.001602253,0.000012347226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019305332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029508611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032800355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013323048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044176042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388196088","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1281219","title":"Benefits and geography of international collaboration for PhD students in biology from four global south countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Geopolitics; Publishing; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Global South; Distribution (mathematics); Library science; Economic geography; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.24237755093929103,"score_gpt":0.5318181706592143,"score_spread":0.2894406197199233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388196088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827597,0.0007688221,0.00023721429,0.0012746583,0.000033054563,0.00002071769,0.00037242216,0.000008162415,0.014525277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887806,0.0003026744,0.00016862695,0.000044556087,0.000016865872,0.000009511559,0.00013269731,0.00000319124,0.0004437036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966355,0.0016736046,0.00025254473,0.0003539443,0.0005333925,0.00055094546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97955704,0.0072897337,0.004420172,0.0009530368,0.0030627241,0.0047173733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004938004,0.00020080016,0.00044480228,0.003730228,0.0016802466,0.0036867268,0.00027977556,0.00047192257,0.004377658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025563536,0.000097467666,0.00026306848,0.0058452897,0.0010274182,0.0015805351,0.0048238994,0.00046489277,0.0003690017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038413345,0.00012867656,0.9131431,0.00032627888,0.00020203086,0.00061050296,0.00961813,0.0006696366,0.001067073,0.005086455,0.0020633999,0.06670072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003633289,0.0001240899,0.9643731,0.00015162863,0.00013293872,0.00028278533,0.021382608,0.00031341723,0.000544837,0.0018130108,0.01082077,0.000024329138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008594261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99626976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014009385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021971986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388230703","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mydzv","title":"Reproducibility in Management Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kelley School of Business, Indiana University; University of California, Irvine; University of California, San Diego; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nanjing Audit University; Université de Montpellier; Southeast University; Universiteit van Tilburg; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Universität Mannheim; Universität Hamburg; Business School, University of Auckland; Chinese University of Hong Kong; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Università degli Studi di Trento; Banca d'Italia; Universität zu Köln; Simon Fraser University; Università degli Studi di Padova; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Central University of Finance and Economics; Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz; Université de Strasbourg; Bangor University; Hunan Agricultural University; Aalto-Yliopisto; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Sungkyunkwan University; Technische Universität München; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Radboud Universiteit; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Deutsche Bundesbank; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Monash University; Fudan University; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Nanyang Technological University; National University of Singapore; La Trobe University; University of Warwick; University of Toronto; Morgan State University; University of Alberta; Copenhagen Business School; McGill University; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; Loyola Marymount University; Fundação Getulio Vargas; Universitetet i Stavanger; Masarykova Univerzita; Wilfrid Laurier University; North Carolina State University; Université du Luxembourg; Università degli Studi di Milano; Harvard University; University of Miami; University of Texas at Arlington; Science Foundation Ireland; Université de Lorraine; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Colorado Boulder; Boston College; Tel Aviv University; Universiteit Maastricht; University of New South Wales; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Technology Sydney; University of Southern California; University of Memphis; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Durham University; Central Michigan University; Carnegie Mellon University; Universiteit Utrecht; Toulouse School of Economics; Aarhus Universitet; University of Pennsylvania; Université de Lausanne; University College London; Purdue University; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Harvard Business School; York University; University of Portsmouth; San Diego State University; Universidad del Rosario; Central South University; Virginia Commonwealth University; Yale University","keywords":"Reproducibility; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.7775366978816028,"score_gpt":0.6558190457547928,"score_spread":0.12171765212681007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388230703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2971387,0.084857516,0.32154596,0.055858135,0.015473516,0.009974412,0.022614328,0.0052204872,0.18731694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908498,0.0057368274,0.07874716,0.0036065136,0.004461059,0.0055187107,0.0050312853,0.0009637302,0.005084964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.27605233,0.4126323,0.1005283,0.05208863,0.1530398,0.0056585683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04994398,0.5738529,0.12873694,0.138231,0.10537589,0.0038593272],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5391064,0.0017533805,0.004306778,0.038820054,0.006177039,0.024713779,0.0055048186,0.004230862,0.0097473925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.85971296,0.0018895934,0.0049742553,0.055045392,0.01083134,0.0139235025,0.01727147,0.0025106526,0.0027563875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012726001,0.00023826063,0.3232727,0.019225724,0.007999462,0.0006965623,0.031539742,0.004109324,0.0016026633,0.06936602,0.05251458,0.4881624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008299217,0.0012416469,0.3915631,0.016032605,0.0037529191,0.0020471395,0.011813934,0.015878191,0.007882018,0.2329258,0.3148884,0.0011442853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038972727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033340347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46089357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009038661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021510646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5683639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388344927","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/jzwdt","title":"Not a Steamroller, a 3D Process: Scientization and the Bank of England","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Credibility; Ideal (ethics); Accounting; Ideal type; Business; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.5834776788050517,"score_gpt":0.5661851239874421,"score_spread":0.017292554817609607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388344927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8104486,0.010213099,0.009181482,0.029449891,0.00021660446,0.00011008451,0.00025443942,0.000093718794,0.14003217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905855,0.0011315154,0.0012822238,0.000309194,0.000022766802,0.00002907337,0.000029310646,0.000013225084,0.0065970914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909112,0.0055384315,0.00043047973,0.00075074995,0.001401542,0.0009676183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97665185,0.014622153,0.003993283,0.0013672162,0.0019172813,0.0014482187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163832,0.00018522187,0.00037880594,0.003706971,0.00674422,0.016240204,0.0006497871,0.0016067643,0.0067254384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024693232,0.00041620017,0.00016529145,0.0074255713,0.016963564,0.008607166,0.005477329,0.0012808047,0.0007704991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004725178,0.00009032164,0.07785403,0.00045750066,0.00004694122,0.0018136172,0.21741927,0.0016327046,0.0011506854,0.61213154,0.009875043,0.07705582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012506593,0.00015780817,0.14337146,0.001160994,0.000057110905,0.00088774634,0.29099542,0.0024165509,0.0019887676,0.17207818,0.3865811,0.00017976925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051801972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057782542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015324497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011014137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11118752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388446498","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.15358","title":"The state of green open access in Canadian universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; Université de Montréal; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Work (physics); Political science; State (computer science); Open data; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.32939913352789746,"score_gpt":0.495047140516965,"score_spread":0.16564800698906756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388446498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74990934,0.02184364,0.0030486311,0.0389086,0.00033222305,0.00022283438,0.0036728266,0.00046709,0.18159485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808224,0.0052464143,0.0016342681,0.0017310857,0.000098239674,0.00003782077,0.0006760561,0.00008929704,0.009664507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93388367,0.004938456,0.0030320436,0.004389435,0.04497268,0.00878374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.766832,0.04334388,0.030259365,0.021583794,0.10882946,0.029151639],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028445877,0.00034977606,0.00082621473,0.029316911,0.014317987,0.025004052,0.004074737,0.0019882917,0.0054409984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11415348,0.00072217366,0.0006903694,0.042659584,0.014760957,0.008112682,0.0092045115,0.0018687263,0.00056323386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005255381,0.0001767817,0.22404633,0.0013874756,0.00025769637,0.00089720666,0.10234585,0.0012174776,0.004570967,0.21053413,0.03874243,0.41529807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003069481,0.00010719622,0.536277,0.0014224987,0.0001423725,0.00053615036,0.04927575,0.0014815116,0.0021999336,0.012858215,0.39518052,0.00048817298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9537886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95825684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99592525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10920171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19921331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79231757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388446687","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.15568","title":"Mapping information research in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Library science; Unit (ring theory); Mosaic; Field (mathematics); Citation; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Archaeology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.44227245791857944,"score_gpt":0.47936103258495616,"score_spread":0.03708857466637672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388446687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3793462,0.0424048,0.011838024,0.030912569,0.00056298746,0.00066942925,0.05771798,0.0008760116,0.475672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217189,0.018833729,0.017777357,0.0013341253,0.00008169917,0.00022281092,0.010961089,0.00021124545,0.028859032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909603,0.0008030977,0.00041532886,0.00091901026,0.00524631,0.0016558205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97983336,0.0030557828,0.0012818794,0.0006394304,0.013570297,0.0016191805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039250785,0.00046913233,0.00065510324,0.0398968,0.010599898,0.009717585,0.0018564669,0.000731906,0.007194793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019559273,0.00034484218,0.0005395372,0.10186962,0.0023882862,0.0023667207,0.004016326,0.000799603,0.0006386452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016460013,0.00005334634,0.19914164,0.0033501773,0.00020918707,0.0012665394,0.043369,0.005077057,0.0026444227,0.23412941,0.09355649,0.41703814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019503803,0.000029790448,0.3462464,0.001423308,0.00013597312,0.000331707,0.032012373,0.0033399786,0.0009538708,0.009786216,0.60557705,0.00014371613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99727315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16261142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27154115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388465513","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00272","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publication; Publishing; Oligopoly; Library science; The Internet; Economics; Business; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Finance; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.8782480311744858,"score_gpt":0.6940854257892891,"score_spread":0.1841626053851967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388465513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82143945,0.0056790365,0.015133667,0.041018195,0.00029986026,0.0001094236,0.0010952686,0.00017945099,0.11504565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959804,0.0007235104,0.0006735885,0.00073972234,0.00008027286,0.000012318052,0.00008349008,0.000016563235,0.0016902051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953577,0.0015970457,0.00021722658,0.0005388986,0.001424655,0.00086442416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96866834,0.015233049,0.0065883948,0.0011828636,0.003646031,0.004681313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005890005,0.00023094978,0.00039057483,0.0029328817,0.0016394156,0.012201296,0.0008405173,0.0012881971,0.008275636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029630668,0.00037825384,0.0005807636,0.0047037583,0.0034050161,0.008406297,0.0023400811,0.0017372709,0.00086418196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071408326,0.00028921323,0.24851656,0.0005962308,0.00042144617,0.0014922426,0.005189409,0.027231177,0.0019567402,0.5168562,0.037702233,0.15903448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020385502,0.00039491916,0.33388197,0.00089418114,0.000290082,0.0010078807,0.018911695,0.079055525,0.0029264782,0.41586766,0.14617182,0.00039400838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132956905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012677202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067827036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035321717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049212217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388500252","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2023.2281503","title":"The performance of bibliometric analyses in the health sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; China; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Pace; Biomedical sciences; Citation impact; Citation; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Pathology","score_opus":0.9614202202530888,"score_gpt":0.7944987910901559,"score_spread":0.16692142916293295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388500252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34977648,0.32805863,0.12518601,0.018068137,0.0035386283,0.006052809,0.06684683,0.0030547373,0.09941771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857072,0.03323587,0.05975903,0.0005646094,0.0016744323,0.0032714393,0.014106786,0.0003552345,0.0013254038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6949775,0.16547728,0.052796677,0.0148560265,0.06878313,0.0031094137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41162547,0.46140137,0.05446642,0.021381844,0.048961993,0.002163025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20292875,0.0025627387,0.0067466097,0.17781222,0.002453027,0.01637526,0.0027026397,0.0019788023,0.004431951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5099684,0.00091097347,0.008069217,0.23016863,0.0025675274,0.010041252,0.008743437,0.0014194457,0.0012409786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012424767,0.00024219196,0.30590567,0.054834712,0.04070794,0.0005083312,0.008462103,0.016850946,0.001305268,0.026254259,0.026764197,0.516922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061685115,0.0013858882,0.56118125,0.026136545,0.035103053,0.0016507651,0.013801551,0.07584679,0.00595623,0.124499954,0.15272976,0.0010913399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060006767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047902544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065922444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090415655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388513251","doi":"10.1002/asi.24844","title":"Varieties of diffusion in academic publishing: How status and legitimacy influence growth trajectories of new innovations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Diffusion; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Economic geography; Demography; Demographic economics; History; Geography; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.2166630347796288,"score_gpt":0.467857612752969,"score_spread":0.2511945779733402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388513251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961359,0.0002561363,0.0004992153,0.00025592872,0.0000061776927,0.000016178186,0.00012314496,0.00000991355,0.0026973214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995314,0.000054753287,0.00015501134,0.0000057200946,0.0000064827923,0.000005857318,0.000058362886,0.0000033137146,0.00017923283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.0012038876,0.00027866743,0.0005132452,0.00062617,0.00034122492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9106771,0.055971187,0.019961229,0.0036710484,0.005516436,0.0042030658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00763018,0.00022012184,0.00047742767,0.005575136,0.00096132467,0.0058123246,0.0007173229,0.0009050231,0.0038210698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06495228,0.0002564195,0.0004811035,0.0048020827,0.0018977958,0.005808601,0.0022471286,0.0011271037,0.0005860969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023840858,0.00014430427,0.97534615,0.000048928177,0.00009289419,0.00011989686,0.0044834907,0.00089495565,0.00066716643,0.003967738,0.00017948273,0.013816617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015363736,0.0001153724,0.9812975,0.000042438314,0.00003559844,0.00015069124,0.0062424834,0.004991277,0.000479849,0.0055901385,0.001004903,0.0000344141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049176384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038769725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012263557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008132717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04035276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388654272","doi":"10.7202/1076465ar","title":"Le libre accès, une priorité pour la recherche en santé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Health science; Library science; Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy; Medical education","score_opus":0.8871116099295135,"score_gpt":0.7314124304147316,"score_spread":0.15569917951478196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388654272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031981824,0.12912314,0.024287058,0.4376827,0.030716935,0.0004613361,0.007336721,0.0018214205,0.36537254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1427597,0.18566777,0.101998396,0.1423651,0.037247397,0.0026363246,0.015951999,0.0025916395,0.36878163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8828739,0.05621416,0.01278474,0.0073384936,0.037146002,0.0036426338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75135374,0.096934535,0.016880937,0.04110501,0.071659155,0.022066643],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06116223,0.0010498166,0.0032442096,0.0121709835,0.00469201,0.030324224,0.0023063822,0.010831596,0.08951093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18265201,0.0017602829,0.0015387996,0.012161265,0.015170985,0.03469528,0.01768018,0.011059626,0.04912259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017468823,0.00008264193,0.0013550239,0.0038992192,0.00012952504,0.00012460639,0.0014629528,0.00014285158,0.0007212033,0.29174593,0.47435018,0.22581112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024758643,0.00003554035,0.0010196246,0.0018720324,0.000033711465,0.00022839848,0.0004922142,0.00005874289,0.0002667734,0.030029995,0.9658909,0.000047235102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056855995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055494327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008605384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039131343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3234607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388658322","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.7366","title":"The neglect of equity and inclusion in open science policies of Europe and the Americas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Openness to experience; Equity (law); Incentive; Political science; Public relations; Public policy; Transparency (behavior); Ethos; Science policy; Objectivity (philosophy); Open science; Inclusion (mineral); Neglect; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.7099295677185388,"score_gpt":0.6538960585412826,"score_spread":0.056033509177256136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388658322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5032024,0.023966322,0.008776716,0.2437994,0.0007859125,0.000104158105,0.00028978245,0.00008898968,0.21898629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773467,0.0025725989,0.0018363185,0.015511043,0.00018265715,0.000089745474,0.00006575739,0.0000307771,0.0023642608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95002353,0.028902903,0.0035608928,0.003795365,0.008976088,0.004741271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8742593,0.09470738,0.009919706,0.008287702,0.007518731,0.005307094],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07496023,0.00021739014,0.00074334966,0.0038979352,0.007012313,0.020963384,0.0012364262,0.0056441077,0.0016528883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08675802,0.00040349946,0.0005522149,0.00582903,0.02299856,0.0144483065,0.014666665,0.005871322,0.00017692623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010951088,0.000057999332,0.0073672156,0.00040789304,0.0000365702,0.00022365266,0.044214368,0.0005738551,0.0006014174,0.8806686,0.005018814,0.060720213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000866623,0.00012351108,0.032856103,0.003151514,0.000076551456,0.00035555134,0.10073724,0.0007562747,0.0018248099,0.42634746,0.43355364,0.00013071386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010373148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005936692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99876356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012284888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024558136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39643234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388851052","doi":"10.1002/asi.24852","title":"The decrease in uncited articles and its effect on the concentration of citations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.20225363668285168,"score_gpt":0.48218410740754425,"score_spread":0.27993047072469257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388851052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816735,0.0042721257,0.0011925199,0.0023044872,0.00008773836,0.000015526906,0.0010040272,0.00011414487,0.009335872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803287,0.00034065513,0.0001285953,0.00009269036,0.00007114221,0.0000076472315,0.00024853388,0.000017059368,0.001060786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947918,0.0022297741,0.0005124583,0.0008463078,0.0011495601,0.0004700114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81675506,0.12536381,0.033778667,0.005319165,0.012359253,0.0064239623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051354556,0.00021951048,0.0006919516,0.004261564,0.00070453755,0.0037464667,0.0010352076,0.0009820412,0.008811788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11081772,0.00015548088,0.00054551184,0.0073459446,0.0010692695,0.0017680437,0.0015348404,0.0012052279,0.0015840221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012419345,0.00033891777,0.9378384,0.00037988607,0.000648726,0.00062266766,0.001979247,0.002104853,0.0015714606,0.00570794,0.0034984748,0.04406748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023929428,0.00017981284,0.98642147,0.00010859485,0.00026501753,0.00029826487,0.0011925418,0.0033297262,0.0013061536,0.0032428491,0.0036106852,0.000021002801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067712967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027210552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99573845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012687976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008299541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02947843},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4388890968","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.11140","title":"The state of OAI-PMH repositories in Canadian Universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; World Wide Web; Computer science; Rendering (computer graphics); State (computer science); Data science","score_opus":0.5636661843411337,"score_gpt":0.3948142269604985,"score_spread":0.1688519573806352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388890968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.787539,0.015144811,0.0035894562,0.019635411,0.00020816788,0.00047713876,0.06603275,0.00072668504,0.10664664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96831036,0.0057173716,0.0037055495,0.0007743494,0.0000434059,0.00011955644,0.011572236,0.00012052722,0.009636608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789692,0.0016387369,0.0016194674,0.0020959424,0.010851345,0.0048253383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9288792,0.008916431,0.011095258,0.0038241246,0.04086228,0.00642265],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093542505,0.0004317245,0.000908388,0.031204209,0.013109224,0.015863486,0.0035226685,0.001165772,0.0050899806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05378,0.0006533138,0.00071699795,0.093289845,0.0043944763,0.0053654793,0.005894588,0.0010791925,0.0007742506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045809234,0.00011025599,0.600122,0.0019148925,0.00023051823,0.0007022277,0.056087185,0.0018881656,0.0016184156,0.090113565,0.045857504,0.20089717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023048815,0.00005197733,0.6585344,0.0013541465,0.00016520757,0.00037908825,0.0659434,0.0023875658,0.0019656199,0.002939537,0.26593968,0.0003163356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13499008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17271818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97942615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389036243","doi":"10.1037/cap0000381.supp","title":"Supplemental Material for Research Productivity Norms Among Canadian I–O Psychology Scholars","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Productivity; Applied psychology; Social science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.7213815080196927,"score_gpt":0.6299912255496735,"score_spread":0.09139028247001924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389036243","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012810695,0.000164389,0.00082485116,0.0017591136,0.00037855524,0.0004965581,0.93527865,0.001252145,0.04703508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08763874,0.00076317316,0.012084617,0.0017425603,0.00032801717,0.0024111378,0.76563287,0.0007924397,0.12860644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970837,0.00019008858,0.00026981762,0.00024327404,0.0016347491,0.00057842775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379323,0.017772187,0.0026246172,0.001746677,0.03664799,0.003276127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024236124,0.00083718536,0.00062587525,0.012008019,0.0040043895,0.0030211706,0.0017007256,0.0008102309,0.42584234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03814423,0.00041803604,0.00071310624,0.020429322,0.0005157529,0.0012929887,0.0012479139,0.0010776443,0.035893466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008281643,0.00018950035,0.012803028,0.00032954934,0.000022459717,0.00003842286,0.00043830698,0.000115771545,0.00008498444,0.0014593509,0.96011144,0.024324285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020819933,0.000075257456,0.28272873,0.00070410187,0.00011057699,0.0001818914,0.004805922,0.0008556336,0.00067794,0.0031882883,0.70630324,0.0001601857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87122315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9248363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016730241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030571816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8189662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389045464","doi":"10.1038/s41561-023-01315-y","title":"Collaboration between women helps close the gender gap in ice core science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Geoscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Closing (real estate); Publishing; Core (optical fiber); Women in science; Ice core; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Geology; Climatology; Demographic economics; Engineering; Gender studies; Economics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.5513996505730159,"score_gpt":0.594976695241037,"score_spread":0.04357704466802115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389045464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6513716,0.005336396,0.0035441043,0.087635964,0.0017116911,0.00006862325,0.000659642,0.000097738244,0.24957424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823461,0.0011422215,0.0008482253,0.0045183385,0.00030787484,0.000049597198,0.00014812285,0.00005393299,0.010585621],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922983,0.0044829403,0.00023994765,0.0006368599,0.0010593884,0.0012826109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513716,0.032184318,0.003649949,0.0018092957,0.0032718587,0.007712962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012047359,0.00029718707,0.00048512276,0.0021169945,0.00515407,0.0059069265,0.00083400117,0.0017303234,0.027235137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047980074,0.00019459426,0.00034397896,0.0021682282,0.0027958958,0.005652228,0.00756192,0.0016176654,0.0026390648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013478501,0.0006796186,0.34209445,0.0009880733,0.0002686128,0.0011153097,0.124548525,0.0007224102,0.001975344,0.07018643,0.08915952,0.3669138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003202653,0.0005053846,0.19027118,0.0018839613,0.00024871668,0.0006353871,0.26705852,0.0013401931,0.0020393822,0.10747841,0.42811856,0.00010004092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067177694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014231065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022593162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075719752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09111065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389140112","doi":"10.1038/d41586-023-03762-4","title":"Why is China’s high-quality research footprint becoming more introverted?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Index (typography); Footprint; Quality (philosophy); Regional science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6603088369012983,"score_gpt":0.6626146868126132,"score_spread":0.0023058499113148834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389140112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87774783,0.0038094963,0.0014178293,0.037890162,0.00059680175,0.00006800442,0.0011710179,0.00024551066,0.07705316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881633,0.00082209375,0.0006018712,0.0039529237,0.0002208734,0.000023282637,0.00039853805,0.000022191292,0.005794863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724305,0.0003206048,0.0001523543,0.0003970117,0.0011469861,0.0007399344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98994887,0.001475098,0.0020057417,0.0010337295,0.002420917,0.003115646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033056291,0.0002713636,0.0005449909,0.004024989,0.0030442392,0.006010021,0.0008968602,0.0011884063,0.0075613623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056321025,0.00018665864,0.0005529304,0.0065808063,0.0034227252,0.0024747294,0.0025511808,0.0013932807,0.000591769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035166522,0.0002760603,0.6307639,0.0008887966,0.00064781815,0.0015764509,0.011142783,0.001109422,0.0070273164,0.12369676,0.04282181,0.17969723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077304736,0.00017945167,0.8707437,0.00019459854,0.0001049415,0.0003514033,0.0071740947,0.0006272415,0.0012983033,0.015142919,0.10402302,0.00008315169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042307977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064978436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049939775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129059525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08412343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389153991","doi":"10.1522/rhe.v7i3.1539","title":"Les soutiens et les formations à la prise de notes offerts dans les cégeps au Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue hybride de l éducation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.639811325736357,"score_gpt":0.5586751283971906,"score_spread":0.08113619733916644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389153991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91773,0.0019699703,0.0019028222,0.010835921,0.000114925584,0.000064022846,0.0006148747,0.00006265462,0.06670488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571202,0.0013597575,0.0006528784,0.00040615053,0.000021980759,0.000024229596,0.00014635385,0.00002455503,0.040243782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739635,0.00064119464,0.00008022439,0.00028631077,0.0010132705,0.0005826553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882025,0.0036122042,0.0011598524,0.00044395015,0.004423212,0.002158207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030605055,0.00019423722,0.00028354282,0.0022820907,0.0085386215,0.0057439525,0.0006157382,0.00090832904,0.013149185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011637228,0.00021214352,0.00016181929,0.0044581695,0.0032156878,0.00185589,0.0021588278,0.0013521248,0.0010003467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002726746,0.00018412682,0.2556476,0.0005662553,0.00006544939,0.0021168801,0.36711794,0.00082104345,0.0059537706,0.035618376,0.034029607,0.29760626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010969049,0.00007026062,0.45225576,0.00040570548,0.0000332572,0.0002800285,0.3009776,0.0008123804,0.0013428268,0.0016071999,0.24211666,0.00008729978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85056657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9409184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14943343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027634444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034845203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30062693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389206729","doi":"10.1037/cap0000381","title":"Research productivity norms among Canadian I–O psychology scholars.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Productivity; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7676042837253434,"score_gpt":0.6396129518071805,"score_spread":0.12799133191816292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389206729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94265354,0.001754568,0.0005227355,0.0070145642,0.00019454764,0.00018211023,0.003194818,0.00004685027,0.044436358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963977,0.00042376443,0.00029199856,0.00026168863,0.000029128722,0.000043004035,0.0006312248,0.0000104230285,0.0019110454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.980331,0.0018407508,0.0012540446,0.0014071091,0.012548498,0.0026186535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8402495,0.025137927,0.02095752,0.0038197066,0.08805066,0.021784727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016160302,0.00026149233,0.0004003751,0.013143729,0.0048834356,0.005362264,0.0016528063,0.00065808155,0.0032014407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100055285,0.00020008291,0.0002580352,0.016695848,0.0028241714,0.0014122488,0.0021355515,0.0009989019,0.0002952759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043965777,0.00022035332,0.85340476,0.00022250111,0.000115278366,0.00013978392,0.039564315,0.00035276945,0.00081439,0.009438377,0.018498559,0.07678919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019534,0.00006578507,0.9643681,0.00011189573,0.000024399626,0.000049789425,0.016780457,0.00034840844,0.00036548392,0.0006421757,0.017161503,0.00006251333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93013394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9394471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042560108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06614893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30879664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389210846","doi":"10.13003/tyad9xtruc","title":"“Who Cares?” Defining Citation Style in Scholarly Journals by Vincas Grigas and Pavla Vizváry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Style (visual arts); Confusion; Publishing; Library science; Identifier; History; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Archaeology","score_opus":0.8151392922615274,"score_gpt":0.6461948723136283,"score_spread":0.1689444199478991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389210846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16177404,0.15442269,0.013713284,0.49322852,0.0207677,0.00038472298,0.0034927835,0.0005907961,0.15162551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78764653,0.10858668,0.022998527,0.025387438,0.013302451,0.00079263287,0.0036320244,0.0006410513,0.03701266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882931,0.005917101,0.0009884122,0.00102854,0.0033218511,0.00045098612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584632,0.021680279,0.0037467359,0.001091026,0.0126911495,0.0023275374],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151489,0.00042479875,0.00050925865,0.011136387,0.002163943,0.007392426,0.0005530379,0.0009858218,0.0033158816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06857536,0.0002206581,0.00043807144,0.01006929,0.0022661414,0.004296764,0.0032374386,0.0016329312,0.0021085609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001905378,0.00009386478,0.0946107,0.0013498731,0.000069635,0.00017935809,0.01758258,0.0002331641,0.00064337,0.04209354,0.36780933,0.4751441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005862715,0.0001559388,0.155947,0.0064187376,0.00013383501,0.0012503214,0.032449994,0.0010494447,0.0019997358,0.0468871,0.7534743,0.00017506038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040425025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050441073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029825696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004394938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080115974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389222850","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-e004en","title":"THE GROWING CHALLENGE OF PREDATORY PUBLISHING: A CALL FOR ACTION","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Call to action; Publishing; Action (physics); Business; Political science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.9375746485619034,"score_gpt":0.6677774440568481,"score_spread":0.2697972045050553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389222850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030191513,0.03659915,0.00069870206,0.90674037,0.05253453,0.000014992272,0.000020488995,0.00010152171,0.0029882519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015723955,0.1011601,0.0041943872,0.67221946,0.19715351,0.00008416552,0.00007682406,0.00043438698,0.008953177],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9266104,0.02722528,0.00670675,0.004393579,0.03181063,0.0032533163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5856442,0.2852391,0.02387787,0.010615675,0.062338013,0.032285176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054252863,0.00084063504,0.0020160654,0.004112952,0.009815701,0.032128677,0.0056816223,0.03133058,0.01299684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19022182,0.00082564965,0.0017802056,0.0042200843,0.026527625,0.039114468,0.010393095,0.037365448,0.0068126605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043409353,0.00005033998,0.0005900815,0.0020001093,0.00003908923,0.0006422863,0.0049107587,0.00009214657,0.00015517091,0.037403557,0.86796576,0.0861073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010420522,0.00003799434,0.0003939678,0.0026249245,0.000017249704,0.0008194976,0.003401414,0.0001226614,0.0000988237,0.025698302,0.9667165,0.00005814152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004063025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072805844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009579321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030473912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389309117","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1684","title":"Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Queen's University","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Publishing; Inclusion (mineral); Evidence-based practice; Best evidence; Critical appraisal; Qualitative research; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Medical education; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9866112398185908,"score_gpt":0.8221297151216669,"score_spread":0.1644815246969239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389309117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8345413,0.026877629,0.033988334,0.08233714,0.0013421549,0.006712698,0.0006360384,0.00017420971,0.013390521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576477,0.0071885753,0.014753769,0.012313847,0.00039427105,0.0056490973,0.00010839114,0.00013034703,0.0018139115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.52847564,0.37878045,0.04025842,0.008935072,0.038617942,0.0049324045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3300704,0.54738116,0.06621984,0.016702747,0.03228303,0.007342806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24165921,0.000522187,0.0022116369,0.009317022,0.013078981,0.019764455,0.0026354792,0.0051606046,0.0023320983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48222905,0.0020310082,0.0011044256,0.011599029,0.023666697,0.01764509,0.013596424,0.004299261,0.0005170442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009966291,0.00003831048,0.0071108188,0.0032492175,0.000048299982,0.00047194614,0.9686932,0.000049445192,0.000669094,0.003876999,0.0011061108,0.014586988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071601615,0.00017894506,0.003784035,0.005658054,0.0000682772,0.000712968,0.9486317,0.00017588439,0.0004821846,0.0044313036,0.035720605,0.000084322106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043200646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006004122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011346342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034104507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9351692},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389398895","doi":"10.1503/cjs.007022","title":"The impact of Canadian-produced research on the global orthopedic literature: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Orthopedic surgery; Productivity; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Quartile; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Demography; Library science; Economic growth; Internal medicine; Surgery; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.7818306891012017,"score_gpt":0.6031174757098267,"score_spread":0.17871321339137503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389398895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73189634,0.08412253,0.003969684,0.008642749,0.0003514134,0.00058164704,0.07054666,0.0004018138,0.09948714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94472426,0.032716613,0.005547053,0.0002891261,0.0002891448,0.00017962418,0.014252466,0.0000735521,0.001928296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795831,0.0014333085,0.001471226,0.0011390811,0.015318185,0.0010551333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236709,0.025448786,0.012837567,0.0015396111,0.033328217,0.003174961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010776355,0.0007526295,0.0015280284,0.12244589,0.0032162566,0.009638398,0.0011937842,0.0006079838,0.0035249172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060456883,0.00023855035,0.0017192103,0.22313802,0.0017176404,0.002027391,0.0025644568,0.00058159424,0.00047970883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019025452,0.000065720546,0.80930084,0.009082116,0.001949284,0.0007969508,0.0041616303,0.0035554885,0.00071495806,0.006670841,0.02062356,0.14288843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019387368,0.000049317754,0.9477923,0.0016639227,0.0012240108,0.0005427409,0.0040402235,0.0027579889,0.0005423471,0.0014114756,0.03986957,0.000086725806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60544425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6124526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98922366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028453572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048593733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79375875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389473801","doi":"10.1002/agt2.474","title":"From bud to blossom: The incredible journey of <i>Aggregate</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aggregate","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Impact factor; Citation; Directory; Scopus; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Nanotechnology; Physics; Materials science; Law","score_opus":0.5095492356721106,"score_gpt":0.5414667035550386,"score_spread":0.03191746788292793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389473801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046177586,0.034312494,0.002995488,0.7727894,0.046260517,0.000028470891,0.00039239117,0.000568829,0.13803466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1109327,0.035993066,0.0072111352,0.47284165,0.04194141,0.00015433317,0.0007227938,0.0034628802,0.32674003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931437,0.0022510693,0.00029769324,0.00090092886,0.002600148,0.00080656377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877978,0.0024716712,0.0008154796,0.0009886539,0.003567847,0.004358575],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005571309,0.0007692255,0.00068474736,0.0017308532,0.012578515,0.02694721,0.0013199659,0.0050589736,0.021037849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023336507,0.00054729515,0.00068980217,0.0029199189,0.0096801445,0.023299156,0.009084102,0.013165716,0.020135863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024542473,0.000011599469,0.000308032,0.00007064932,0.000006304435,0.00017799952,0.009997747,0.000019007792,0.00020943368,0.036623444,0.9382181,0.014333128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011295137,0.000006032775,0.00020489909,0.00011539663,0.0000019896675,0.0001563526,0.0036723076,0.000019568424,0.000072559706,0.004236025,0.9915005,0.000013104108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005553803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008792111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99826914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004754329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052618305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0703786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389510776","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47343-2_16","title":"Grey Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Layperson; Flexibility (engineering); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.7387218652187281,"score_gpt":0.5889666273153269,"score_spread":0.14975523790340117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389510776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011175127,0.015682021,0.01048184,0.0072791977,0.0010081681,0.00011831473,0.00059198565,0.00019194068,0.9635291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06351731,0.04003321,0.022065757,0.0037748762,0.0020611943,0.0003501358,0.002377252,0.00037751553,0.8654428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776495,0.00055714784,0.00014641609,0.00032822948,0.0010779765,0.00012530776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639744,0.0015550263,0.00017918173,0.0006093588,0.0010543446,0.00020472507],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023233404,0.00065435504,0.00088461395,0.009105648,0.002004037,0.008534734,0.0013213464,0.002625908,0.12368203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011568003,0.00034287496,0.0005661618,0.010774031,0.0029555443,0.0069629215,0.003608942,0.0014335588,0.043734323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013794131,0.000012394068,0.000119628916,0.0004896032,0.000012847896,0.00014645644,0.00073042966,0.00030429146,0.00012302326,0.70884967,0.136163,0.15303484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041010026,0.00000480187,0.00017251243,0.0005605757,0.0000059351364,0.00011708073,0.00040638013,0.00026524643,0.00008276061,0.31023157,0.68814373,0.000005321678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004172005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057226066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033382648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004717769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41375756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389547294","doi":"10.1038/s43856-023-00418-2","title":"A bibliometric analysis of geographic disparities in the authorship of leading medical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Citation; Bibliometrics; Publication; Medical journal; Library science; Geography; Scopus; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Regional science; Medicine; Demography; MEDLINE; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8156671707673102,"score_gpt":0.6660387258024996,"score_spread":0.14962844496481065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389547294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97775763,0.0037369365,0.0018133196,0.0009101181,0.000055455122,0.000082283,0.009385693,0.000077226614,0.0061812885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357104,0.00095964555,0.0010495465,0.000046909336,0.000100268226,0.000058223264,0.003940786,0.000015579622,0.00025793494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278545,0.0022466506,0.0016427038,0.00082607736,0.0021069925,0.00039216448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92332053,0.036561355,0.028040217,0.0038583104,0.006793363,0.0014262937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007385484,0.00027052016,0.00071308925,0.047892895,0.0007160024,0.0030011798,0.0005873414,0.00043974823,0.0026878153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06328025,0.00015178404,0.00078879565,0.07962518,0.00069764804,0.0023423398,0.0021102873,0.00030891947,0.0005558703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006579558,0.00002302736,0.9753493,0.0004437639,0.00036324805,0.00008780523,0.000984553,0.00051782,0.00021835524,0.000987931,0.0014469426,0.019511402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001001232,0.000041639974,0.98981994,0.00017155395,0.00016758569,0.00027076082,0.0021261596,0.0015954648,0.00019638769,0.0011592472,0.004423916,0.000017423901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006145377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006760639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013661588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019235223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039058626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389610381","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.11.571170","title":"Best Paper awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Publication; Best practice; Diversity (politics); Political science; Discipline; Public relations; Open science; Library science; Accounting; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4282145735138333,"score_gpt":0.5011596080532705,"score_spread":0.07294503453943724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389610381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7939782,0.0023022562,0.010872226,0.04777427,0.0008900324,0.00041077723,0.0010845539,0.00036734957,0.14232035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922742,0.00043799475,0.0021801463,0.0017087483,0.00036134687,0.0000933591,0.00021843764,0.00006221074,0.0026634422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.82443446,0.069966614,0.020886565,0.0057943114,0.07078024,0.008137875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.402943,0.28774345,0.15080321,0.057256915,0.06571785,0.035535622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12843885,0.00028812588,0.0009409331,0.0076542175,0.004446283,0.019943597,0.0018204075,0.0014975009,0.010096246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43425933,0.00047568016,0.0005900256,0.009627932,0.0060819397,0.011401472,0.010853096,0.0025026512,0.0019731582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008699087,0.00062079757,0.48849592,0.0014493592,0.0003859869,0.00040693957,0.015410194,0.00097110134,0.0019127821,0.0951209,0.041698,0.35265815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002538925,0.00066683395,0.6857908,0.0014420396,0.000212803,0.0009985982,0.029017802,0.0032150177,0.0025238805,0.12668754,0.148977,0.00021379425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016502677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024892823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043747495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009221783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67925763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389686822","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2","title":"The oligopoly of open access publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Publishing; Oligopoly; Open access publishing; Business; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.9066864170215745,"score_gpt":0.7241775974229555,"score_spread":0.18250881959861898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389686822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20705366,0.004043217,0.12557876,0.014831856,0.00038182418,0.00022375134,0.0015844927,0.00047169364,0.64583075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463512,0.0017337396,0.010278345,0.0007498403,0.00036154108,0.00011098616,0.00017809299,0.0000985817,0.04013768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571735,0.0016777924,0.00018676679,0.0006511674,0.0012674187,0.00049949024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977862,0.013274781,0.0022937167,0.0022686746,0.0019097453,0.0023910105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027870145,0.00032556773,0.0012125624,0.0030072895,0.0035944309,0.012726476,0.0008942394,0.001966873,0.0320272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01813951,0.0007296893,0.0007559367,0.0043024123,0.0074024918,0.007835734,0.00230501,0.002019992,0.0024272732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048409947,0.00002928935,0.0008112095,0.0000639385,0.00001611279,0.00008374244,0.00014264167,0.0019848214,0.00023850858,0.985954,0.002908604,0.007718877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032934968,0.000017803364,0.0011631283,0.000041746258,0.000011006203,0.00007077628,0.00014493322,0.004998911,0.00012404424,0.9799401,0.013438448,0.00001610893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081589725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011794688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99910575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004272208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050178207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10714173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389748324","doi":"10.51983/ajist-2019.9.2.262","title":"Research Productivity of Life Sciences from 2014-2016: A Scientometric Study through Web of Science Database","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Productivity; Publication; Library science; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Publishing; Biological sciences; Life span; Database; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Gerontology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.35904375318580745,"score_gpt":0.5526774208282079,"score_spread":0.19363366764240048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389748324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87952375,0.014835948,0.0011612696,0.0014419,0.00015583528,0.00011013092,0.09277781,0.00017747356,0.009815951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89824045,0.010184455,0.0018811036,0.00015496743,0.00027840107,0.00019621466,0.087282196,0.000059667487,0.0017225519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884439,0.001246485,0.0033211973,0.0009388231,0.005353632,0.00069590786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677939,0.01266553,0.009997468,0.0012088397,0.0069526117,0.0013816302],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065552318,0.00038940928,0.0011829152,0.06095655,0.00083883107,0.0054586483,0.0007672906,0.000737137,0.0017209043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02820424,0.0002247684,0.0014323627,0.10560647,0.00041944414,0.003870194,0.0018118497,0.0004068406,0.0012193118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002824295,0.00014855238,0.9172478,0.0027499367,0.0007083943,0.0005481964,0.0011155751,0.00090375583,0.0006509503,0.0011263111,0.00907711,0.06544097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014301196,0.00011198156,0.9659936,0.00042890193,0.00034683105,0.0007995542,0.0023923437,0.001992241,0.0010566574,0.00047008612,0.026349,0.000044416774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004710355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044064866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93904346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013913136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021311075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03466779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389765078","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0293080","title":"Disciplinary gender balance, research productivity, and recognition of men and women in academia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Discipline; Gender balance; Field (mathematics); Gender gap; Women in science; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8517999871879728,"score_gpt":0.5856706198714842,"score_spread":0.2661293673164886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389765078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96910703,0.008123481,0.0011589397,0.0037441906,0.00017900373,0.000018441517,0.00043622454,0.000011379076,0.017221346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679035,0.0013472044,0.0002799708,0.00034884753,0.000090750116,0.000014504116,0.0000955433,0.000006805142,0.0010260051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949804,0.001852738,0.00040565836,0.0007801646,0.0013110463,0.000670011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97094417,0.015315301,0.007627186,0.001168261,0.0019022283,0.0030428616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008457955,0.00024140997,0.00067143684,0.0042715976,0.002176486,0.003200823,0.00053216994,0.00052830187,0.0065428535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03343261,0.00016380235,0.00030559298,0.0053957393,0.0022275597,0.0033117144,0.0023340986,0.000582315,0.00081402523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000321676,0.00007948322,0.85565114,0.00046490756,0.00014066808,0.00030851693,0.044928014,0.00014001093,0.001204551,0.010462605,0.0024874506,0.08381099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019907784,0.00014361106,0.905192,0.00046814268,0.00006371627,0.0005497069,0.06394342,0.00022228049,0.00062125915,0.012112113,0.01662386,0.00004005739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039468724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008051211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012691681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001674597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044730484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389786568","doi":"10.1186/s13643-023-02410-2","title":"Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Guideline; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Medicine; Scopus; Process (computing); Bibliometrics; Data science; Computer science; Management science; Library science; Psychology; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.7241108159152894,"score_gpt":0.6179719659443282,"score_spread":0.10613884997096112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389786568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035407592,0.024850903,0.46102637,0.15429719,0.02351108,0.26331872,0.028411135,0.009130045,0.031913888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032885775,0.0057699964,0.81862897,0.012821487,0.0013764055,0.14925066,0.0059508597,0.0006904181,0.002222656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.23976591,0.36301202,0.32117414,0.007383836,0.06447919,0.00418492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11811971,0.45737854,0.06801124,0.05950772,0.29062286,0.0063598314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5358465,0.005664013,0.014010798,0.05051114,0.008673575,0.024643933,0.01866278,0.027234359,0.011375836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.78274226,0.01075318,0.02136477,0.05049046,0.012066216,0.019622589,0.018938238,0.02946806,0.019471195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070562196,0.0005765359,0.003281962,0.14733459,0.0014575218,0.0009939777,0.013225701,0.0017538618,0.0041018105,0.04632903,0.53792745,0.24231192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001385159,0.0007123585,0.010185994,0.22821864,0.002419297,0.0019301547,0.005098844,0.003004215,0.004426679,0.04711771,0.6945123,0.0009885653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00885376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008892339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018605566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085845806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.572384},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4390095083","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104938","title":"The interdependent influence of lobbying and intellectual capital on new drug development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Interdependence; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Criticism; Social capital; Industrial organization; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Sample (material); Economics; Biotechnology; Law","score_opus":0.731170739857711,"score_gpt":0.6596370523479049,"score_spread":0.07153368750980604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390095083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75471663,0.01804375,0.0034612014,0.06333007,0.00022642262,0.00008885121,0.00059419946,0.00007347236,0.1594654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741817,0.0011418393,0.00009771994,0.00054023234,0.00011022746,0.000010943482,0.000023669074,0.000004780853,0.0006523998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.984734,0.0087929685,0.0005865102,0.0007388209,0.0024476585,0.0027001114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66649073,0.26620176,0.042637035,0.0053990586,0.008355804,0.010915506],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023038799,0.00027646928,0.00080134947,0.0050513227,0.0018212126,0.01261799,0.00073447067,0.0028801318,0.009128073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11879325,0.00025213696,0.00044492123,0.005899069,0.007067642,0.004643071,0.0032249452,0.002493865,0.0006737152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002662898,0.001146813,0.44492358,0.0010951789,0.0013334397,0.0010007595,0.002292698,0.01598016,0.0018325915,0.32928234,0.016858187,0.1815913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003122784,0.0005638305,0.6412499,0.00075775944,0.0010529018,0.00046099743,0.00711387,0.015220846,0.0033217098,0.29161352,0.03818178,0.0001506116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005087791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068406994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006439176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008416697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121842325},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4390104160","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556","title":"Reproducibility in <i>Management Science</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Binghamton University; University of California, Los Angeles; Business School, University of Auckland; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Southern University of Science and Technology; Hunan Agricultural University; Libera Università di Bolzano; Universidad del Rosario; Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg; Toulouse School of Economics; Deutsche Bundesbank; Université de Montpellier; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Southeast University; Universität zu Köln; Agricultural University of Athens; Universität Mannheim; Università degli Studi di Verona; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Università Bocconi; Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Göteborgs Universitet; Danmarks Tekniske Universitet; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Chinese University of Hong Kong; Zhejiang University; Shanghai University of Finance and Economics; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Universiteit Gent; Tel Aviv University; Dartmouth College; Università degli Studi di Trento; Banca d'Italia; Lunds Universitet; University of California, Irvine; Universität Wien; Université de Strasbourg; Bangor University; University of California, San Diego; Southern Methodist University; Aalto-Yliopisto; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Loyola Marymount University; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Masarykova Univerzita; Université de Fribourg; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Washington University in St. Louis; Monash University; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Universität Zürich; National University of Singapore; La Trobe University; University of Oxford; University of Colorado Boulder; University College London; University of Warwick; Universität Hamburg; University of East Anglia; York University; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Copenhagen Business School; Fudan University; Aarhus Universitet; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Universidad del Atlántico; Fundação Getulio Vargas; Universitetet i Stavanger; Deakin University; Science Foundation Ireland; University of Cyprus; University of Texas at Arlington; Wilfrid Laurier University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Purdue University; Universiteit Utrecht; Temple University; Universität St. Gallen; University of Technology Sydney; Santa Clara University; Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz; Technische Universität München; Central South University; Virginia Commonwealth University; San Diego State University; Nanjing Audit University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Portsmouth; Universiteit van Tilburg; Yale University; Nanyang Technological University; Shandong University; Universität Rostock; Università degli Studi di Milano; Universität Innsbruck; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Johns Hopkins University; North Carolina State University; Université du Luxembourg; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; Kelley School of Business, Indiana University; Microsoft Research; Université de Lorraine; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; McGill University; University of Southern California; University of Memphis; Durham University; Singapore Management University; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Central Michigan University; Università degli Studi di Padova; James Madison University; Augusta University; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Georgetown University; University of South Carolina; KU Leuven; Universiteit Maastricht; Brigham Young University; University of New South Wales; University of Bern; University of Pittsburgh; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; Simon Fraser University; University of Connecticut; Université de Lausanne; Boston College; University of Miami; Harvard University; Carnegie Mellon University; Radboud Universiteit; Texas Tech University; Florida Atlantic University; University of Pennsylvania; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Northwestern University; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Harvard Business School; Central University of Finance and Economics; Sungkyunkwan University; Emory University; University of Toronto; Imperial College London; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; University of Alberta; Morgan State University","keywords":"Reproducibility; Computer science; Management science; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.5718768911711274,"score_gpt":0.5872786213728848,"score_spread":0.015401730201757391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390104160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30530444,0.073657975,0.16694938,0.09236068,0.029544659,0.016486673,0.11561049,0.009912435,0.19017328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76057744,0.010364192,0.13366422,0.01193747,0.011680885,0.017938957,0.035357602,0.0033275709,0.015151566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.3799105,0.23089385,0.17276305,0.05075809,0.15853211,0.0071423883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05784699,0.43449944,0.17873286,0.1102367,0.21242623,0.006257817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.47793746,0.0020895456,0.004332948,0.058527566,0.005682223,0.025309633,0.0063900948,0.0052568438,0.015683217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.83141977,0.0022667008,0.0053968597,0.06879774,0.0060713897,0.010424298,0.014578153,0.0021282416,0.008362095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014888333,0.00028469457,0.330415,0.024464194,0.007648997,0.001308877,0.019321902,0.0019452783,0.0038185187,0.01891233,0.24144055,0.3489507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007401696,0.00093247875,0.41051048,0.019167118,0.004794351,0.002445499,0.0075421054,0.008862688,0.01318644,0.037695374,0.4927613,0.0013619862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042997557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069574476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52206254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067430222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020782316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6437961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390235107","doi":"10.18280/ijdne.180606","title":"Global Trends in Poliomyelitis Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1857–2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Qassim University","keywords":"Poliomyelitis; Scopus; Acute flaccid paralysis; Citation; Thematic analysis; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Geography; Political science; Library science; Data science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Virology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Poliovirus; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.36115477138755553,"score_gpt":0.5568854569492151,"score_spread":0.19573068556165957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390235107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71097726,0.1544252,0.0013035054,0.0037387856,0.00028297186,0.00023867853,0.10904581,0.00027654629,0.019711206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8786327,0.07346111,0.0017200831,0.0002588836,0.0004889373,0.00023104069,0.043876197,0.000068804366,0.0012622775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941446,0.00074688793,0.0017904467,0.00071760855,0.0021570963,0.00044335282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813711,0.0077952286,0.0053095156,0.0006116894,0.004338028,0.0005744079],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004153121,0.00048217358,0.0012597007,0.0972232,0.0006984444,0.0042103087,0.0005477113,0.00057376345,0.002872894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020897808,0.00023844189,0.0015920306,0.16114885,0.0007568232,0.0029323297,0.0022835734,0.000470929,0.0010133127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003647189,0.00007222504,0.7342417,0.018345755,0.0021602171,0.0012419537,0.005713305,0.0018462555,0.0011156332,0.004171063,0.019412696,0.2113145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001740243,0.00009521863,0.9136101,0.004406511,0.0010116154,0.0017078273,0.005135756,0.0011965146,0.00058446947,0.0009952477,0.07117844,0.000060873128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007677894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007994171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9027768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002023141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026841075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021964073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390536543","doi":"10.5860/crl.85.1.96","title":"Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Open access publishing; Business; Electronic publishing; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Advertising; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.6982906713916218,"score_gpt":0.6083056759273465,"score_spread":0.0899849954642753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390536543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945926,0.00037318442,0.00019090393,0.00191648,0.000027829028,0.000029765468,0.000056348166,0.000012575433,0.002800242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997623,0.00044851197,0.00034150583,0.0006781759,0.000045435943,0.000029643572,0.000052859647,0.0000073825427,0.0007734688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947562,0.0021278195,0.0008002826,0.0002602755,0.0014923454,0.0005629526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9269232,0.03039726,0.022142878,0.0011416924,0.008648995,0.010745966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009148609,0.00011927877,0.0003577394,0.0018396964,0.0013338411,0.004104786,0.0005500881,0.00083448924,0.0037944647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06445118,0.00024571316,0.00023299098,0.0016143542,0.00071868766,0.0026157545,0.0012846928,0.0010092604,0.0005633547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021073385,0.00042431115,0.9318792,0.0002871063,0.00006843366,0.00065661996,0.036624454,0.000098097305,0.0007377477,0.0005976794,0.0029144282,0.02550115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061504565,0.0006592571,0.8082197,0.00030238627,0.000081855644,0.0011715572,0.17206536,0.0008551598,0.0005474025,0.00054154254,0.015418622,0.00007558607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031872233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039637326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000964277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018151366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048383057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390694881","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04904-1","title":"Country names in journal titles: shaping researchers’ perception of journals quality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Audience measurement; Publishing; Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Internationalization; Perception; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Psychology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.8876352380282057,"score_gpt":0.7020697218535584,"score_spread":0.18556551617464723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390694881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876243,0.002160042,0.0013459775,0.0019675791,0.0001912572,0.00007509874,0.00018904844,0.00002474227,0.0064220135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763143,0.0005385175,0.00091958354,0.00030407542,0.000079999256,0.00003592805,0.00006698002,0.00001199947,0.00041132106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699589,0.017232064,0.004365004,0.001357239,0.006026592,0.0010603627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6911482,0.16499333,0.09113558,0.007052202,0.0315845,0.014086165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035853073,0.00026231707,0.0005642806,0.004176479,0.0019693822,0.0066864765,0.00071846787,0.0009929294,0.0034518861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16014424,0.0004476912,0.00048527188,0.004361044,0.002876232,0.004179211,0.0035909074,0.0009935522,0.00060527824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062564213,0.00020811564,0.82885873,0.0014566106,0.00026043697,0.0006978175,0.11961496,0.00022058062,0.0035213386,0.0015960251,0.0024130365,0.040526636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077812205,0.0007641171,0.7824232,0.0013625135,0.00017677213,0.0010345358,0.19182417,0.0007220709,0.0016896655,0.0027149338,0.017040348,0.00016988114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015803342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022915918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015406001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018785641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18961143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390755087","doi":"10.1038/s41386-024-01796-4","title":"Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychopharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.48461339746687737,"score_gpt":0.6353370452515822,"score_spread":0.15072364778470482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390755087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457528,0.010062752,0.0072792075,0.0031614942,0.0005268904,0.0005023264,0.003233069,0.00044255465,0.029038936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396616,0.0006349263,0.0027346697,0.00013498458,0.00022282018,0.000114972434,0.0005232475,0.000073542156,0.0015947903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9321142,0.021050224,0.009427009,0.0043592458,0.031053314,0.0019959558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4553131,0.34752244,0.12012823,0.021315034,0.038906228,0.016814996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04535002,0.00055163726,0.00076651556,0.008990763,0.0014989119,0.007203354,0.0014173365,0.0008752796,0.0070290007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33481607,0.00033133265,0.0013698152,0.019592453,0.0027332678,0.006610171,0.0046570655,0.0012964087,0.0011188611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017248619,0.00030531525,0.8967492,0.00048113795,0.00089655665,0.00020737897,0.0014760724,0.00072760327,0.0012316132,0.0035325873,0.0024302353,0.09023736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026094229,0.00051295897,0.9911034,0.00007940418,0.000148599,0.0003227511,0.00058006175,0.0008700047,0.0008600152,0.0027649458,0.002700517,0.00003113628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027088854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038502994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99858266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030513185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2398367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390873698","doi":"10.32388/d0pndo","title":"Review of: \"Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Citation; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.54414708913449,"score_gpt":0.5464384669861437,"score_spread":0.0022913778516537864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390873698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017634828,0.04158949,0.0022358836,0.72941077,0.12849185,0.00020420922,0.0010144374,0.00022633062,0.095063515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07128973,0.09911061,0.007035823,0.3599234,0.24162498,0.0005226551,0.0020310811,0.00071818655,0.21774356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740384,0.006791079,0.0028321135,0.0014656844,0.014226684,0.00064592814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7532328,0.110998936,0.017314399,0.0065339026,0.10410096,0.007819092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030447893,0.0007217994,0.0010744459,0.010375287,0.0051615667,0.015686316,0.0033215028,0.010228921,0.021709356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17986602,0.00043095497,0.00063831965,0.0075288545,0.008583351,0.00835617,0.0034223122,0.006268322,0.010050423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012216522,0.000015513939,0.0003764926,0.0006482796,0.000011843234,0.00013742762,0.000518216,0.000048608686,0.00007561753,0.031283323,0.93761855,0.029253943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008484847,0.000011892401,0.0013780708,0.0011067314,0.000024765739,0.00017742987,0.0004556294,0.00012447566,0.00009909102,0.0068136747,0.989777,0.000022607988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011240263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024527429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98962474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065272753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02719088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16102576},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391239537","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.24.577031","title":"The Increasing Authorship trend in Neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Neuroscience; Psychology; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24078796745115016,"score_gpt":0.47352454809833866,"score_spread":0.2327365806471885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391239537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660086,0.0030119868,0.0013220187,0.0006478955,0.00004572309,0.000046762096,0.022789797,0.0000905559,0.006036669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98270893,0.0015867219,0.0013463836,0.000044995588,0.00005113603,0.000050317893,0.0136787165,0.000027004422,0.0005056762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579066,0.0010382235,0.00076416886,0.0007629175,0.0012304671,0.00041362556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624922,0.018899005,0.009692716,0.0019037,0.0058916616,0.0011206701],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004269434,0.00033183783,0.0007355392,0.036361776,0.0006009457,0.003504053,0.00045461027,0.00048745042,0.0021803011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030637557,0.00019071494,0.0009331617,0.06437455,0.0006913751,0.0021537635,0.0017325521,0.0005057303,0.00067713193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012084565,0.000037642585,0.95522434,0.00063395215,0.00048834743,0.00031659342,0.001225374,0.003972609,0.0004158848,0.0015243381,0.0051047592,0.030935314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014080622,0.000041226496,0.9789974,0.0002104966,0.00014609248,0.0003433814,0.0026299735,0.004223917,0.0003951847,0.0008293608,0.012139524,0.00002929679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060473587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004035488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010237781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012006623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022579193},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391311615","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-52233-x","title":"Impact of medical technologies may be predicted using constructed graph bibliometrics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Computer science; Random forest; Citation; Data science; Pipeline (software); Machine learning; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.47367089176192456,"score_gpt":0.5817619050905887,"score_spread":0.10809101332866411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391311615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8661315,0.004513416,0.09363425,0.003954996,0.00015270255,0.00020643775,0.011087818,0.0017882914,0.018530611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864014,0.000981903,0.009387743,0.00008230215,0.0000887775,0.000055926856,0.0025032633,0.000030261534,0.0004684909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703515,0.0010780215,0.00034441083,0.00034845702,0.0009840045,0.00020994405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96349525,0.027534379,0.005123383,0.0013793587,0.0021178494,0.0003497709],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005556566,0.0006318673,0.0006830169,0.016878637,0.00031389823,0.0027625652,0.00041517147,0.00080562633,0.0020271915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059288602,0.00020588862,0.00089171284,0.01388963,0.00051200576,0.0024311766,0.00083932915,0.00065531436,0.0010890093],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038596685,0.00025213748,0.69358885,0.00045810067,0.00060428993,0.00022308815,0.00018464644,0.07949847,0.0014580224,0.0072774803,0.004677904,0.21139102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077679266,0.00026445088,0.38243726,0.00023628079,0.00034233878,0.0004079423,0.00030722836,0.54888105,0.0042568366,0.05447224,0.008207368,0.00010937725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038177788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034389568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013038669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010519776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029386282},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391608398","doi":"10.1111/1365-2435.14483","title":"Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Instituto Superior de Agronomia; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication bias; Identity (music); Gender bias; Biology; Double blind; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Psychology; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.5685267737783857,"score_gpt":0.5729761752933773,"score_spread":0.004449401514991624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391608398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07978365,0.03137797,0.6572334,0.14280948,0.02216674,0.020216545,0.008241148,0.0011271453,0.037043933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706195,0.0036972885,0.19952148,0.08400816,0.007228592,0.022076946,0.0013711713,0.000587501,0.010889328],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.22608827,0.5690678,0.07296946,0.030572807,0.09585919,0.005442436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06263142,0.7559097,0.061189186,0.07581278,0.042399846,0.0020571486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.56455255,0.0019061465,0.0052532144,0.009331036,0.005334773,0.009674386,0.0061833565,0.008766305,0.009258701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.83167076,0.0016837247,0.011121845,0.008636307,0.0097356355,0.012923763,0.009365706,0.006939184,0.0023076828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014817417,0.00082386244,0.116170935,0.027153272,0.023100946,0.0018273628,0.023113733,0.0025303236,0.0018042091,0.22847024,0.16685314,0.39333457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007271343,0.0032389215,0.07267374,0.02736576,0.029286895,0.004430747,0.005337365,0.032448087,0.010630457,0.47632548,0.3298636,0.001127602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004840565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004053433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43544745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049353335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01318117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53698426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722944","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13189","title":"The gender citation gap: Approaches, explanations, and implications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology Compass","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Gender gap; Social science; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8431052284939669,"score_gpt":0.5924655245783323,"score_spread":0.2506397039156345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28517362,0.18679947,0.044362046,0.39073154,0.003316751,0.00022633954,0.0013278916,0.00023775961,0.08782451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96263075,0.019798102,0.004712852,0.007422628,0.0024383604,0.0001452078,0.00016247173,0.00004346565,0.0026462546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921555,0.0035636309,0.00045111173,0.0013150023,0.0018015925,0.0007132708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937161,0.048660643,0.0070942584,0.0016510965,0.004394471,0.0010385407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022009442,0.00080344593,0.0012647489,0.00980414,0.002199528,0.004911179,0.002680467,0.0026694732,0.007590721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05420758,0.0002919952,0.000792331,0.00821951,0.008210971,0.009019845,0.0042426363,0.0018629177,0.0006663415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028730516,0.00017517491,0.14218149,0.0023283642,0.00027416958,0.0007971203,0.018410008,0.0009077124,0.00044852303,0.6676684,0.012586948,0.15393482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044873792,0.00013595057,0.10613721,0.002414274,0.00021426879,0.00072567334,0.029237323,0.0030532794,0.0006592671,0.8273809,0.02991535,0.00008178818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006546958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047958884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036148934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031619167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11639845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391733618","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae015","title":"A new initiative for the <i>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</i>: supporting early career investigators","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cancer; Library science; Family medicine; Gerontology; Medical education; Political science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.7193994243751446,"score_gpt":0.5961869763124157,"score_spread":0.12321244806272891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391733618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002356723,0.008736606,0.003281141,0.69748867,0.21909449,0.001058887,0.0024363939,0.0023285854,0.06321849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017341409,0.020830955,0.031525128,0.51114863,0.19199829,0.0024680782,0.009188932,0.0027698295,0.21272884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791784,0.0041220835,0.0014505493,0.0017715044,0.010701032,0.0027763392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7692946,0.02604448,0.0117476145,0.010590463,0.041949917,0.14037287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03362239,0.0013801366,0.0012221757,0.004492746,0.007624662,0.024570687,0.006216512,0.0109157665,0.036486056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05937734,0.0010832073,0.0015242796,0.0036059942,0.0040634437,0.008446486,0.012873899,0.018683419,0.017035438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037476904,0.00006686099,0.0003991165,0.00014775983,0.000007764554,0.00006831593,0.00007850033,0.000017312683,0.00025783145,0.0025468173,0.97989184,0.016480295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004135452,0.00005738573,0.0010122593,0.00018343268,0.000010138866,0.00008893926,0.00020786577,0.00006524228,0.00022607837,0.0011304393,0.99695647,0.000020360543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004477196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017373588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008428733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077340364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17781436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391815425","doi":"10.1002/asi.24876","title":"Understanding super‐partnerships in scientific collaboration: Evidence from the field of economics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"General partnership; Value (mathematics); Productivity; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Citation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Library science; Statistics","score_opus":0.5916618700494413,"score_gpt":0.5238679637321623,"score_spread":0.067793906317279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391815425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97671676,0.0019504416,0.006985636,0.0010960525,0.000012081256,0.000023212906,0.00013213776,0.000009278368,0.01307432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989473,0.00040221325,0.00047174885,0.000026947699,0.00000742575,0.000007292812,0.000035270965,0.0000018923179,0.000099879944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911697,0.0053005493,0.00046295143,0.0009003584,0.0016099518,0.00055641925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90019137,0.06597864,0.020078972,0.0043735923,0.0053450866,0.0040322845],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010083254,0.00018539201,0.00044784747,0.004758505,0.0017109506,0.0029854137,0.00075607933,0.0007497625,0.003943142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055368263,0.00023117647,0.0003839032,0.008803837,0.0021764226,0.005476332,0.0050067366,0.00079877366,0.0004018036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035437697,0.00028914798,0.8401045,0.0005018818,0.00036610253,0.0004632156,0.014062796,0.0030030902,0.00053591013,0.055831112,0.0010087653,0.0834791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052404554,0.000220623,0.7897903,0.00043392542,0.00021249992,0.0006518833,0.041370712,0.012773922,0.0008092057,0.14345793,0.01017675,0.00004999366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021478503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019496704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000908617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001479716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05332601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391884287","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00288","title":"Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Scopus; Field (mathematics); Web of science; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8724255180851594,"score_gpt":0.6912206117189744,"score_spread":0.18120490636618503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391884287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663467,0.0044257487,0.0042632837,0.0012659533,0.00019034272,0.000092663155,0.0071815755,0.000097821314,0.016136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929,0.00080682896,0.0017712292,0.000047605427,0.000097474054,0.00005092745,0.0037204837,0.000029828241,0.0005756536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97810274,0.0057015857,0.0061019175,0.0014234234,0.0076600835,0.0010102708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69492114,0.13667408,0.0988521,0.013325711,0.051322598,0.0049043684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02274867,0.00026149405,0.0010381932,0.040258676,0.0010651549,0.007577675,0.0009396018,0.0007389318,0.0028503637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20219103,0.00021825913,0.0006121225,0.075817905,0.0013596488,0.008227471,0.003553885,0.0007139096,0.0008019406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029352854,0.00012118092,0.9215831,0.0009267755,0.0004991713,0.00016072292,0.0019553003,0.0011236904,0.00046958725,0.004706498,0.0029633392,0.065197125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020949521,0.00013462923,0.9746621,0.00076984364,0.0002211275,0.00029010884,0.005111012,0.0036188383,0.0012672008,0.0047505875,0.0090841465,0.00006948669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008291723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00815599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97725135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016575475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024049548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12030786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392018298","doi":"10.1002/leap.1599","title":"The publication facts label: A public and professional guide for research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford University","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8146641771034259,"score_gpt":0.6471720701494891,"score_spread":0.1674921069539368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392018298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012151761,0.017599119,0.10088991,0.34435517,0.08936912,0.0191335,0.044777136,0.026545139,0.35611567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004550928,0.02530534,0.2571272,0.081613325,0.032426115,0.021621363,0.03609622,0.014191237,0.52706826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9542877,0.011734726,0.012533804,0.0015532759,0.018218381,0.0016719591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62735766,0.16380268,0.03626756,0.020479819,0.14027256,0.011819705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049327724,0.0021636116,0.0040592914,0.021448186,0.005342805,0.023539606,0.005662319,0.016469983,0.15863866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21536328,0.0035315913,0.0016805648,0.022516068,0.0049830615,0.020910822,0.006196991,0.01985523,0.29874715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024230789,0.00003820817,0.000058185433,0.00052482006,0.0000025565091,0.000066588334,0.00018023176,0.00005500245,0.00034340736,0.003780959,0.95073265,0.04419327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017426592,0.000024356132,0.00018376025,0.0007602115,0.0000031286613,0.000110774854,0.00017719758,0.000086199085,0.00010153142,0.002718866,0.99579227,0.000024264693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070652002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044052587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027120914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53069913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392057301","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1335454","title":"Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Scraper site; Information retrieval; Visualization; Data science; Graph; Citation database; Data retrieval; Data visualization; World Wide Web; Data mining; Scopus","score_opus":0.7988117842642299,"score_gpt":0.6516311723059829,"score_spread":0.14718061195824705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392057301","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0588736,0.0014583722,0.1992745,0.0023235858,0.00083741674,0.0019260043,0.20670441,0.5009406,0.02766159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13200672,0.0012309601,0.5146945,0.00070211675,0.00060057605,0.0026160423,0.27211934,0.04177483,0.034254882],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281245,0.001539744,0.0009198196,0.0010417495,0.0033165195,0.00036971533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658521,0.010660087,0.004494628,0.0064217374,0.010839898,0.0017314188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060406583,0.0021427947,0.0014386867,0.019903746,0.0010484502,0.0041500493,0.0017121964,0.0008295944,0.017400283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041002233,0.0010884601,0.0012537009,0.016735857,0.00041752946,0.004271391,0.0037385873,0.0012928329,0.01988423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005512482,0.00025295993,0.01079164,0.0018755517,0.00039116014,0.00039908075,0.0017521372,0.0015185061,0.011725235,0.00480824,0.5171917,0.44874257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063026015,0.0005354839,0.05492461,0.0005672523,0.00025833555,0.000711257,0.0015108605,0.05578516,0.07972039,0.017682835,0.787074,0.00059949217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065789837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010094936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99395937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011969198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003604668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058209777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392109487","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x","title":"Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Scientometrics; Data science; Regional science; Bibliometrics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Sociology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5043046486588112,"score_gpt":0.5676367040364447,"score_spread":0.06333205537763353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392109487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988118,0.0013538008,0.00020756536,0.000901548,0.00002389704,0.0000068543127,0.0042810254,0.00001974523,0.0050874157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998004,0.00020206581,0.00007241553,0.00005888206,0.000022479842,0.0000035592643,0.0012133897,0.000009170027,0.0004140767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998243,0.00040356338,0.00022727474,0.00038183478,0.00029302435,0.00045140093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819781,0.0069216643,0.006630583,0.0012468974,0.0022003548,0.0010224152],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002271252,0.00013888409,0.00047783973,0.0032173144,0.00034968555,0.0015205526,0.0005943508,0.0005111714,0.006912026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016135983,0.00015190101,0.0008487429,0.0061897947,0.00052252656,0.0011713615,0.0014210282,0.00053011905,0.00080546364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018633525,0.000030449479,0.9888391,0.00009218504,0.0003592977,0.000084367435,0.0011911294,0.0002093348,0.0007138673,0.0016214049,0.0010347359,0.0056376955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031116847,0.00001432186,0.997951,0.000020424732,0.000053455897,0.000060775936,0.00084133993,0.000084248924,0.00008332841,0.00022198731,0.0006610457,0.0000049744353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023133676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032050632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99678266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043898236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069722865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045998037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392122745","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00296","title":"Do you cite what you tweet? Investigating the relationship between tweeting and citing research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Academic institution; Institution; Positive correlation; Unit (ring theory); Social media; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.9203955165518652,"score_gpt":0.6926351140286738,"score_spread":0.2277604025231914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392122745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99199474,0.0011388718,0.0010387327,0.0010820132,0.00008411468,0.00002599338,0.00073099585,0.000019498837,0.003885144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971112,0.0005836169,0.0003902401,0.00007449579,0.00013344576,0.000027049065,0.00039331563,0.000009120537,0.0012774809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962288,0.0013039467,0.0005546728,0.00048417586,0.0011166391,0.00031171137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.813083,0.123767756,0.0468579,0.0032440186,0.008638078,0.0044093286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004859995,0.00022729745,0.00047437765,0.006275053,0.00088483945,0.0031158703,0.00053328654,0.0010308851,0.0043687406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092336535,0.00015957789,0.00040221825,0.012910613,0.00051152136,0.0027470617,0.001254355,0.0010017329,0.0012514621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001726748,0.00010602928,0.97858447,0.0001961237,0.00027740796,0.00015643639,0.0023981996,0.0002185351,0.00039218066,0.00067624846,0.0008757566,0.015945893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110638075,0.00011884192,0.9846519,0.00014882011,0.00021078828,0.0002727257,0.0062419376,0.0020674912,0.0006202618,0.0016698038,0.0039545805,0.000031847132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036168948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006128729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048270432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025702417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392139713","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09521-7","title":"Citation Elites in Polytheistic and Umbrella Disciplines: Patterns of Stratification and Concentration in Danish and British Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Université de Lausanne; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Discipline; Danish; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Higher education; Social science; Citation; Elite; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Biology; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.3343400614231054,"score_gpt":0.5265837888977356,"score_spread":0.1922437274746302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392139713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991668,0.0013760744,0.00027455244,0.00025256077,0.000007510152,0.0000068211048,0.00044211507,0.000009648231,0.0059627565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868995,0.00031087158,0.00009088804,0.000019231245,0.000005147675,0.0000044247304,0.00033385705,0.0000035293383,0.00054200576],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474984,0.0010414876,0.0008456009,0.00075776986,0.0016058779,0.000999441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618447,0.016179455,0.009956548,0.0016446928,0.0075456565,0.0028289817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004614653,0.00013736237,0.0010465896,0.02089094,0.002338283,0.0055034435,0.00087848055,0.0005741455,0.0035260262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034280762,0.0002512584,0.00026209134,0.030303787,0.002508319,0.0018284651,0.003933978,0.0003703739,0.00046881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004864659,0.000051780004,0.9076364,0.00047548168,0.00025754387,0.00021999062,0.037630614,0.0006665251,0.0015480791,0.019784864,0.001573147,0.029669112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012001724,0.000036650225,0.97697145,0.00014966751,0.000044402168,0.00008658656,0.013507389,0.0006189803,0.00034420428,0.0025017774,0.0056940136,0.00003284196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101410136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11541828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99538535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042681065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022043441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20163977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392244592","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001323","title":"Research productivity and gender of research award recipients in international ophthalmology societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Eye Institute; Research to Prevent Blindness","keywords":"Productivity; Ophthalmology; Optometry; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.8837543029489549,"score_gpt":0.7297434568297326,"score_spread":0.15401084611922222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392244592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960412,0.0009798729,0.00018733779,0.00026969644,0.00003819211,0.000018894949,0.0006464189,0.000005950006,0.0018124339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987313,0.00031711318,0.00010588292,0.000044464225,0.00004023917,0.000018735649,0.0003037764,0.0000031275642,0.0004352855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966671,0.0008150349,0.0005939165,0.00039682022,0.001008943,0.0005181181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823162,0.002519757,0.011061494,0.0005295416,0.0013431951,0.0022298403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049480796,0.00023087229,0.0003626627,0.0035737695,0.00059061864,0.001057218,0.000522746,0.0003006906,0.0041149696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017515432,0.00013267405,0.00037488906,0.0028125662,0.0004911866,0.0013508622,0.0011126063,0.0003850385,0.0007817645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172473,0.00003555143,0.9948791,0.000021544449,0.000014571379,0.00005188334,0.0003310048,0.000012142736,0.00005318529,0.00005412985,0.00034272412,0.004142375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046571195,0.000108019456,0.9962226,0.000051243984,0.000015728938,0.0004886462,0.0016665966,0.00006333673,0.00007730419,0.00008058612,0.001215136,0.0000060955695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016348097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015033674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005482641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007280265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026168287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392326892","doi":"10.51644/9780889206823","title":"Physics at the National Research Council of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research council; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8922391372286239,"score_gpt":0.6046294376475583,"score_spread":0.28760969958106564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392326892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080660236,0.019548776,0.0005615684,0.07368251,0.03577125,0.00010503312,0.009924625,0.0010809216,0.8585187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001369317,0.0031692376,0.00017089419,0.0016413323,0.000577013,0.0000084366675,0.00081011327,0.00016506376,0.99208856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943479,0.00011528388,0.00013596851,0.00041369582,0.0043574558,0.0006296624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815942,0.00058891426,0.00023434799,0.0009388543,0.014321964,0.0023216498],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026712613,0.00088291254,0.0018777453,0.0047281873,0.0061314865,0.011917666,0.0028899948,0.0051778015,0.35318148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010087658,0.00086263614,0.0010759409,0.011857444,0.0023519134,0.0042063105,0.001817843,0.0034339516,0.23756474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011688111,0.0000075985677,0.00010832136,0.00008903035,0.0000036025049,0.000017829876,0.000023483803,0.000034172903,0.000050350336,0.0038843346,0.97856665,0.017202834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034559982,0.0000032269743,0.0003752612,0.00008346195,0.000005079664,0.000013116896,0.000030106477,0.000023284923,0.000060206323,0.00050602126,0.9988889,0.000007905452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7570324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9200345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03716433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097455494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92260814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392361002","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011797","title":"Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"International Brain Research Organization","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Scrutiny; Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Public relations; Political science; Simple (philosophy); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.4845617284525126,"score_gpt":0.5741376999064534,"score_spread":0.08957597145394075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392361002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09433667,0.0027496077,0.4063789,0.18506148,0.0069476888,0.005449522,0.00094228145,0.0020321955,0.29610175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59437466,0.0008450135,0.3564653,0.018346483,0.0012923835,0.006133403,0.00054183154,0.00067532866,0.021325601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8116511,0.08374395,0.028454307,0.021748474,0.04393276,0.010469382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.703369,0.15965386,0.022571657,0.039429277,0.04999955,0.024976673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16073447,0.0013505445,0.0023801439,0.009267457,0.019445043,0.045656826,0.008031102,0.014851964,0.0072731744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28395727,0.0023248307,0.0027054497,0.00522836,0.049098764,0.030534828,0.028663414,0.016387284,0.0036991707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017348197,0.00022151829,0.008818687,0.0005035244,0.00011017975,0.00037948615,0.016411154,0.0014315731,0.00085788616,0.882058,0.032950316,0.05608418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016345811,0.00009340265,0.004283904,0.0009166743,0.00007842566,0.00022666807,0.010476084,0.0024380088,0.0010618584,0.8734294,0.10652962,0.0003025412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076401555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012453641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010803869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025944797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85005534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392710287","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27201","title":"Cancer research in the United Arab Emirates from birth to present: A bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Jazan University","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation; Web of science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.6333628103930268,"score_gpt":0.6113962410367524,"score_spread":0.02196656935627439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392710287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7953012,0.12689078,0.0019988632,0.0038706318,0.0002278318,0.0006434227,0.04039109,0.00025081562,0.030425357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080607,0.06775955,0.0072252746,0.00021851569,0.0003247647,0.00052683253,0.014376241,0.00002683623,0.0014813168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301004,0.0012630352,0.0015374083,0.0004884736,0.0034550857,0.00024604925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97956127,0.009291969,0.0046509453,0.00051213015,0.005552519,0.00043114007],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076044514,0.00043452403,0.0012035244,0.12127013,0.0010374646,0.0041136234,0.00052060734,0.00048446425,0.0021955057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026516452,0.00022876979,0.0012433414,0.1592203,0.00047076293,0.0021043401,0.0016757159,0.00033913608,0.00044435856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000211036,0.0001183502,0.71862775,0.012330529,0.0018564254,0.0006288773,0.003768278,0.0009991663,0.00062582485,0.0020012516,0.009345373,0.2494872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018335177,0.0001369465,0.95209473,0.0027984537,0.0009724724,0.00094632775,0.0051549077,0.0015699804,0.00045194177,0.0006704744,0.035140287,0.000045117846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009384066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011196477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023687638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037283218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040216684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392914366","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.8272","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diamond; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Materials science","score_opus":0.9267854277029286,"score_gpt":0.7613054004305294,"score_spread":0.1654800272723992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392914366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036682803,0.032037087,0.23587716,0.6193234,0.023761753,0.0015531561,0.0035663086,0.0007760601,0.04642228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33040327,0.019953437,0.5098711,0.10368196,0.01597551,0.0037563832,0.0029182571,0.0016453087,0.011794852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7346992,0.17224698,0.042259242,0.014521796,0.031883404,0.00438937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32672325,0.48281303,0.058872186,0.046122186,0.07776207,0.007707313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26339048,0.0016422677,0.005036775,0.030111386,0.009383597,0.06223025,0.0073861866,0.006854683,0.009434783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57776374,0.0012868863,0.002149891,0.042611815,0.026977604,0.051868208,0.013380909,0.016707774,0.005536041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014748743,0.00012621803,0.03467792,0.0029364221,0.00032284428,0.00032001894,0.02912477,0.00078153063,0.0008573229,0.74242944,0.080341235,0.10793478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012291799,0.00006246724,0.015297687,0.00610451,0.000137625,0.0004727306,0.034770075,0.002155863,0.0011832446,0.6595064,0.2798291,0.0003572997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014912953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018799178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010360566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0142493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9083707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392937379","doi":"10.18438/eblip30413","title":"Plan S and Open Access (OA) in Quebec: What Does the Revised FRQ OA Policy Mean for Researchers?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Computer science; Plan (archaeology); Library science; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.5463859046696865,"score_gpt":0.598080145162363,"score_spread":0.05169424049267646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392937379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1502585,0.024137212,0.009246859,0.69456,0.004439252,0.0010800033,0.004923162,0.00052359846,0.11083146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8302836,0.011748441,0.021699544,0.08165751,0.00093616906,0.0009418636,0.0021466778,0.00022144207,0.050364833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90050274,0.026049813,0.0064643524,0.005395418,0.050663166,0.010924577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65704864,0.12806608,0.024340222,0.021480622,0.13557202,0.03349243],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09217804,0.00038386497,0.0005991263,0.005326647,0.010486157,0.021181362,0.0038597318,0.0043058777,0.0061149257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20258357,0.0006510153,0.0012438194,0.010596303,0.012191876,0.008752604,0.004919522,0.004603424,0.0005463556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044216556,0.00021015383,0.11138486,0.0025478404,0.00025546967,0.00093467423,0.023726717,0.0031118942,0.00284079,0.33544627,0.22397237,0.29512677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001719466,0.00031697092,0.13834172,0.0028790652,0.00014409433,0.00034249548,0.019467924,0.0026860856,0.0018239713,0.018755248,0.8146286,0.00044183488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9629858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9578372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99614024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19093494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47449186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9384008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393047402","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/uw3xe","title":"Does double-blind peer review effectively correct for gender disparities in research funding?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Health Research Council of New Zealand; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Volkswagen Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Double blind; Peer review; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9217960907590893,"score_gpt":0.7064090594723512,"score_spread":0.21538703128673808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393047402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12779814,0.032410078,0.66848785,0.092076235,0.022109875,0.016578827,0.004830155,0.0025586267,0.033150245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6796436,0.0078086136,0.2646056,0.013802798,0.0042624213,0.020949358,0.0011406733,0.00071564724,0.007071256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.33313352,0.51394105,0.05683804,0.027256947,0.06287794,0.005952525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14164035,0.4862927,0.12575929,0.15958972,0.081787534,0.00493039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5968722,0.0017805835,0.004724621,0.0067449543,0.0052104727,0.009468439,0.004557721,0.005954729,0.0064381757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8028819,0.001585836,0.0027424332,0.009634776,0.010657161,0.01024191,0.009681575,0.0036399602,0.0025975176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007982595,0.0005125983,0.09522115,0.01651594,0.007203738,0.00044883753,0.017511634,0.0032801114,0.007390897,0.091772616,0.065890715,0.6862691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007106982,0.0028365194,0.12906666,0.019283071,0.006584415,0.0014500835,0.0063807936,0.02036369,0.02789171,0.45180163,0.32574534,0.0014890538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003175966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044750473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4031278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004563048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027329221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49712837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393161024","doi":"10.32388/prf7hb","title":"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Qeios","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8667607491182786,"score_gpt":0.6416170106213568,"score_spread":0.22514373849692182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393161024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45379812,0.09876711,0.0030177576,0.05785136,0.0009664005,0.0003675221,0.10004826,0.0006399318,0.2845436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828875,0.047719914,0.007911906,0.0032123262,0.00018836239,0.00022063333,0.0258141,0.0002716677,0.0317735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853816,0.00078351324,0.00086227397,0.0011368684,0.008631795,0.0032038114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596499,0.0032152762,0.0029690482,0.0007087238,0.02712199,0.0063350536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479385,0.00067282043,0.0008615141,0.043602698,0.009976419,0.018881872,0.0019697712,0.001042532,0.006239952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024073603,0.0004374747,0.0007447983,0.13533567,0.0024364477,0.0035820755,0.0050039673,0.0012674285,0.0012652442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069164764,0.00007842079,0.19821648,0.0060748495,0.0005219133,0.0028622185,0.056057617,0.0031569316,0.0051364666,0.21210685,0.17707974,0.3380169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020062123,0.000027693814,0.28511593,0.001613619,0.00011932659,0.00044921134,0.037438225,0.000924733,0.00086511974,0.0034329568,0.6698572,0.00013603477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99238366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99152064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15271007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24679072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98273623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393240927","doi":"10.5751/es-14694-290133","title":"The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Social network analysis; Co-citation; Citation; Sociology; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Data science; Geography; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Environmental science; Library science; Social capital","score_opus":0.5661443252570436,"score_gpt":0.5981302566166787,"score_spread":0.03198593135963512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393240927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759852,0.016560545,0.049323257,0.008769208,0.00027065715,0.00016916516,0.0029574353,0.00022678956,0.04573772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867488,0.0029335208,0.00821303,0.00008522366,0.00008870034,0.000059259342,0.0006162293,0.000035048008,0.0012201958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942246,0.00251483,0.0004947309,0.0010302512,0.0014016688,0.00033398223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626024,0.026179345,0.004688958,0.001793463,0.003746715,0.0009890605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073857177,0.00030863748,0.0005925893,0.025499653,0.0021057273,0.0074290615,0.00073544314,0.001179024,0.0028668232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036918305,0.00025390717,0.0006015512,0.038893815,0.0031044688,0.008688437,0.0030093903,0.0008035436,0.00041162223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015786756,0.000096339376,0.50979066,0.0019558538,0.00064147776,0.0015223926,0.04959292,0.009400524,0.0021683918,0.20008999,0.006100882,0.21848272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030562514,0.00014105735,0.52585477,0.0024537386,0.0005601034,0.0024634046,0.05088375,0.08397611,0.002676876,0.19500284,0.13568935,0.00026751444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007112392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073686815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99261427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034486973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003284458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039059877},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4393277428","doi":"10.32388/y3qmnw","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393277428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393278113","doi":"10.32388/g7qjow","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393278113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014498617,0.011793319,0.002330091,0.47249845,0.3128453,0.0020662183,0.03883383,0.0018825289,0.15630041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016250463,0.014013235,0.005229096,0.09186731,0.049832754,0.0014078739,0.027823616,0.0015891893,0.7919863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728872,0.0030209424,0.0011968267,0.0012219594,0.019929575,0.0017435437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78825307,0.011854166,0.0031149187,0.0038735613,0.17314263,0.019761696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023443978,0.0011723103,0.0021625855,0.007740898,0.0076577137,0.013111229,0.004334162,0.0055409158,0.22864223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13385701,0.00059893646,0.0012594116,0.006775275,0.003578136,0.0035314688,0.0042410735,0.0046241004,0.08064396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010276352,0.0000033327196,0.00006811568,0.00015208372,0.00000434456,0.000011440913,0.00003139021,0.000016563907,0.000023628747,0.0006809244,0.99218315,0.0068148635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019417603,0.000006628702,0.0011243519,0.0004937147,0.000019364028,0.000013035877,0.00015703744,0.00009228842,0.00006069549,0.00055375084,0.9974412,0.000018400546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65298873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020544881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23974285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9534212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393299293","doi":"10.32388/8edmdn","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393299293","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003808533,0.031050049,0.0039564352,0.229196,0.113868795,0.0030006615,0.33275536,0.0050933296,0.27727088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032413837,0.03207335,0.010869138,0.05267286,0.019946545,0.0022827177,0.16173129,0.0042934846,0.68371683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97365564,0.002189143,0.0011995764,0.0009860689,0.02045467,0.0015148573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7755194,0.009801439,0.0033166725,0.0025122557,0.1996869,0.009163231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014949817,0.0012482734,0.0014495793,0.018722981,0.005410099,0.0093556605,0.0025130874,0.0019142376,0.097805366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095649526,0.00048795922,0.0011137617,0.02389778,0.001699367,0.0036917797,0.0029724496,0.0018284147,0.048049822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005794848,0.000001890715,0.00013005271,0.0002385868,0.0000031401567,0.000008805686,0.000027825221,0.000017610877,0.00002197473,0.00028450612,0.99218494,0.007074911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010457766,0.0000068052,0.0053417254,0.0007859105,0.000017709483,0.000014681985,0.00018209984,0.00007776516,0.00009011484,0.00023242795,0.9932156,0.000024578367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77418435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8817403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032108948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15024658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45429105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393310426","doi":"10.32388/u1q6oi","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393310426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014345355,0.044650614,0.0013883595,0.7102668,0.12097184,0.0002833812,0.0069130166,0.0006093543,0.113482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041661136,0.08057702,0.0072991797,0.40216386,0.06662738,0.00036702753,0.0071209073,0.0011526577,0.3930308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97998524,0.0018169648,0.0006499235,0.0006690541,0.015836902,0.0010418807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8955236,0.013322281,0.0025251221,0.0019632643,0.078500256,0.008165487],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017171444,0.0009315831,0.0009903843,0.011382584,0.009167868,0.0130506065,0.0026612023,0.004324678,0.025580958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08164162,0.00036855135,0.00067060033,0.012000062,0.0054549063,0.004052371,0.0029495417,0.004254688,0.009646003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004506125,0.000003481446,0.0001579655,0.00019042507,0.000004218331,0.000015487123,0.00013099873,0.000028295657,0.000038746795,0.0029421735,0.9828182,0.013665523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044576977,0.000004121761,0.0018612177,0.00042836263,0.00001452143,0.000014016774,0.00037279542,0.00005470107,0.00006169328,0.0009516633,0.99621445,0.000018043607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83559006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94550604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035926647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20842323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3307563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393354629","doi":"10.32388/lxub5b","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393354629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015246827,0.012059933,0.0022069758,0.48965964,0.29811767,0.002160061,0.037452374,0.0019231274,0.15489556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015062822,0.014485774,0.00555578,0.1008224,0.05252207,0.0014708469,0.027289249,0.0015171893,0.7812739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717702,0.0029787607,0.0012262758,0.0011147106,0.021267865,0.0016422252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7859405,0.012873936,0.0032408622,0.003688258,0.17643268,0.017823646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024856681,0.0011324001,0.00197647,0.00883669,0.008005558,0.013290298,0.0040953583,0.0052940017,0.18077156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12484926,0.00061072997,0.0012391225,0.007195426,0.0037143307,0.0035470359,0.0040216967,0.0045613674,0.07032159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074895333,0.0000033187664,0.00006732724,0.00013321731,0.0000032738012,0.000009352128,0.000027722312,0.000015230466,0.00002096605,0.0005242678,0.99364203,0.0055458406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017299155,0.000006664999,0.0014318696,0.00049534324,0.00001762093,0.000011808447,0.00016419667,0.00009105549,0.0000613815,0.00048626022,0.99719775,0.000018778863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5277831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71365726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02172927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23617859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393372233","doi":"10.3386/w32285","title":"Explorations of Cumulative Advantage Using Data on French Physicists","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.967097118024302,"score_gpt":0.7719073767370955,"score_spread":0.19518974128720645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393372233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96084005,0.0038940671,0.0014438854,0.00087656797,0.000023171217,0.000016301216,0.026734453,0.00012041993,0.006051074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736328,0.0006855449,0.0006700041,0.00007654194,0.0000664165,0.000022222523,0.02370804,0.000024338633,0.0011140797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967719,0.0010896996,0.00023815999,0.00062292116,0.00076690275,0.0005104164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619268,0.022476556,0.007962175,0.0023652362,0.0031312183,0.002138058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048307325,0.00055359013,0.00090303406,0.016915897,0.0008675176,0.0026133512,0.00074807426,0.00069915026,0.00505929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021182865,0.0001938901,0.0008351798,0.018441034,0.00052024744,0.001400709,0.0012362979,0.0005475113,0.0013677021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012596285,0.000057183992,0.97127366,0.00013922114,0.0004238854,0.00024566764,0.0007441787,0.0025318284,0.00031932743,0.002103473,0.0059282514,0.016107345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002878047,0.000067456545,0.97511035,0.000061746134,0.00009507982,0.00023269636,0.0009319801,0.0035853658,0.00023355299,0.0011686462,0.018450603,0.000033669352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08880179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10034934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018003708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014413423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17656982},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4393411564","doi":"10.4324/9781003330431-16","title":"Tracing excellence and equity in research funding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Tracing; Equity (law); Political science; Business; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.946170150598094,"score_gpt":0.717905010685228,"score_spread":0.2282651399128659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393411564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029226858,0.1344702,0.028578397,0.16425614,0.0027691314,0.00018621312,0.00037027744,0.00025904365,0.63988376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7008942,0.12346352,0.03937177,0.01656005,0.0022728324,0.00033462857,0.00039812134,0.0003976891,0.116307236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97209394,0.013843916,0.00083117024,0.0015305497,0.009763063,0.0019371972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95781356,0.03162657,0.0021806946,0.0021749716,0.005065666,0.0011383686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029707173,0.0005064013,0.00077329425,0.009155095,0.0041402997,0.025437957,0.0015101143,0.003049277,0.0050416454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060662474,0.00039582074,0.00044509195,0.015305902,0.023280364,0.01738731,0.008835174,0.0041820495,0.0011325927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012638123,0.000010797832,0.00095967465,0.00027547855,0.000012034737,0.00003449854,0.0058547817,0.00047949742,0.00009720395,0.88397413,0.016666818,0.09162244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006984018,0.000023022383,0.0026738085,0.0013808657,0.00001560614,0.00007290268,0.0061870674,0.0005436113,0.00052751834,0.62737423,0.36116388,0.000030435256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032896727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03572413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035265435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032343756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393509540","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-00899-8","title":"Impact factors are outdated, but new research assessments still fail scientists","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.7130782416689977,"score_gpt":0.7061581106054855,"score_spread":0.0069201310635121915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393509540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18341553,0.09411713,0.1235699,0.051907968,0.019566854,0.00080513314,0.054742344,0.0050740237,0.46680114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079117,0.037225224,0.08587741,0.005485118,0.009053031,0.0008728132,0.026083797,0.0011912321,0.026299633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92430586,0.0142062735,0.007995817,0.0051978165,0.04689731,0.0013968976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6922643,0.099724606,0.029455394,0.04273046,0.13002256,0.005802634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053471036,0.0017534966,0.0025643336,0.0446699,0.0023845774,0.015514467,0.002270121,0.0017561369,0.011419646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23554917,0.0006646636,0.0016905731,0.043177947,0.003927111,0.01510817,0.0041733584,0.0038746856,0.009803881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030014722,0.00021277394,0.08761263,0.004293326,0.0010937086,0.0001369595,0.0023152044,0.0010326041,0.0022548437,0.087766625,0.10044002,0.71254116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010706368,0.0003855338,0.22235923,0.0043139425,0.0010146543,0.00047273192,0.006608022,0.0028175195,0.0067411596,0.30635637,0.44833127,0.00049252063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006836001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008927877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004985708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00710369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2827853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393623353","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3871616","title":"Factors affecting altmetrics attention to scholarly publication in peer-reviewed journals published in Iran and Turkey","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Peer review; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5475436600551109,"score_gpt":0.487099471812507,"score_spread":0.06044418824260389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393623353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62175125,0.0022394017,0.00037246448,0.0006665126,0.00008267888,0.000047513997,0.36740375,0.00025730015,0.007179212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63919675,0.0009267184,0.0010421288,0.000081307415,0.000096777476,0.00011759047,0.356307,0.000051250605,0.0021803973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988166,0.00018893386,0.00019294984,0.0002265179,0.00041790475,0.00015714981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933941,0.0014072966,0.0025865242,0.00036720975,0.0018943279,0.00035058387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012014078,0.00033931184,0.00037219867,0.008193562,0.0002799298,0.0013449256,0.0006411163,0.0003450023,0.0028950875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009120379,0.00010028715,0.00025795182,0.014755957,0.00021700641,0.00071479025,0.00066856854,0.00037483958,0.0015659572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018006835,0.00008389312,0.9192741,0.00057237095,0.00011759217,0.00014245395,0.00039071636,0.00095017045,0.00021920222,0.00078261667,0.04507958,0.03220711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016390411,0.000020654948,0.9719492,0.000060882212,0.000045823872,0.00016074782,0.0007630531,0.0010794625,0.00026203363,0.00018152874,0.025444567,0.00001557658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021332843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02173628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091747957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089628197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042417347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393933266","doi":"10.32388/30oed8","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393933266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394084988","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12813794","title":"data.rar","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9346689568531503,"score_gpt":0.6642941388718242,"score_spread":0.2703748179813261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394084988","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073997607,0.00019749318,0.0028473875,0.0005238916,0.00024168151,0.00021710954,0.9308337,0.018097442,0.046301387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004381598,0.0002865839,0.009283396,0.00085690914,0.00015355612,0.00071951875,0.92445296,0.01054945,0.04931601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974619,0.0004309871,0.00029067256,0.00072712154,0.0008162856,0.0002729642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949398,0.00090896204,0.00036051907,0.0016574707,0.001642981,0.0004902722],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028656444,0.0017059579,0.0018491686,0.0040682787,0.0012554947,0.0040913266,0.0037016494,0.0016557131,0.52598006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009066456,0.0010224623,0.0010705196,0.0054238946,0.00056117756,0.0034210517,0.0031574892,0.002107255,0.6571033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020718893,0.000042089054,0.0009403921,0.000577121,0.00002291994,0.000045996276,0.000081189995,0.00023538653,0.0005389896,0.0022228118,0.96731704,0.027768852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000826018,0.000025610327,0.0010427671,0.000093874725,0.00001547239,0.000035879882,0.0000596307,0.000321286,0.00060585723,0.0017565115,0.995933,0.0000275377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008116831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010744369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47401994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010638575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394303066","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.13537178","title":"Data for: Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Computer science; Environmental science; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.6821170456228837,"score_gpt":0.5770444516135597,"score_spread":0.105072594009324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394303066","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015119802,0.000026585561,0.000030477762,0.000057918547,0.000014558783,0.000007547381,0.99914753,0.000093528004,0.00047062663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00050520943,0.000026102996,0.00016796937,0.000033336,0.0000061119617,0.00005726086,0.9984693,0.00003253112,0.00070216117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839395,0.00024361325,0.0002616332,0.00038201528,0.00047110772,0.00024774828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932272,0.0022136753,0.0012030988,0.0010856008,0.0017844486,0.00048601936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016121271,0.0020446389,0.0011263947,0.0054713343,0.0009562466,0.003134149,0.0023728781,0.0025594279,0.06752504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013323463,0.0007557314,0.0011121999,0.010349307,0.0005044333,0.0014261636,0.001431963,0.00212096,0.0653058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007176679,0.000034405264,0.0014292506,0.00065878144,0.000034970803,0.000019855595,0.000029397917,0.0003005413,0.00009470516,0.00062136084,0.9953852,0.0013196893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076547934,0.000026681812,0.014128281,0.00038138553,0.00005291717,0.00007977706,0.0001190834,0.00052975013,0.0005539921,0.0014972916,0.98182434,0.000040943392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033201396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06265604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020171306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003226558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22589374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394316031","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.8081546","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and 6 English speaking countries 1996-2014: Spreadsheets with 162 graphs.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5119359524711655,"score_gpt":0.5126589981933131,"score_spread":0.0007230457221475417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394316031","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039756476,0.000058438454,0.00003618546,0.000051899213,0.000011139398,0.000008820144,0.9984775,0.00026332377,0.00069517014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025515128,0.00016912264,0.0004417804,0.000039045495,0.00001618359,0.0001170298,0.99494743,0.00013601001,0.0015818065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892944,0.00010916132,0.0002375571,0.00024398345,0.0003672762,0.00011259554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990348,0.0049679773,0.0014920095,0.00087299885,0.002043934,0.00027508664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001415041,0.0012247663,0.00095610396,0.011456489,0.0003848572,0.0020517625,0.0014207433,0.0008328723,0.07928676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015355374,0.0006297613,0.0011482965,0.029006174,0.0002546359,0.0017235095,0.0013454227,0.0011654333,0.03365736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077438686,0.000028875384,0.003982839,0.0014012629,0.00013733491,0.000022635668,0.00007260968,0.0007324905,0.00012015278,0.00071363436,0.98462635,0.008084343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008246123,0.000042974043,0.0950093,0.0010183734,0.00022456546,0.00011601531,0.00030557497,0.0012864824,0.00059370016,0.0030941751,0.89739347,0.00009083456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044933386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049085595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011814642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017110427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2652406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394581234","doi":"10.32388/cvkx5i","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394581234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394675445","doi":"10.32388/n17grc","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394675445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394689084","doi":"10.32388/87cbih","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cartography; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394689084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394763394","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000005700","title":"Bibliometric Networks for Researchers in Health Professions Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Network for Innovation in Education; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Social network analysis; Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Health science; Network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Social media","score_opus":0.8012703957469408,"score_gpt":0.7019638239757008,"score_spread":0.09930657177124003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394763394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050277837,0.007962437,0.6443403,0.011705548,0.0011494977,0.0027608974,0.10469894,0.02682035,0.15028422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18529576,0.005741373,0.73779005,0.00040147195,0.0006222972,0.005126261,0.051138677,0.0017591813,0.012125004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908047,0.004166103,0.0013648075,0.0007931487,0.0026147438,0.00025649075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755182,0.014440973,0.0037573362,0.0029131395,0.0028407206,0.00052958494],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008427724,0.0010061346,0.001058689,0.032265745,0.0018439192,0.005664767,0.0016347691,0.0012908267,0.024673317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084341556,0.0006526551,0.0016675323,0.040592156,0.00079371623,0.0061986004,0.004067927,0.0014509886,0.0068102633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002529808,0.00024590708,0.02868365,0.0031701971,0.000608477,0.00037424473,0.0025936244,0.024261765,0.0012867461,0.25449884,0.15216215,0.5318614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008073833,0.00012281434,0.034059264,0.0015514339,0.00028495968,0.0010406805,0.0013309577,0.10442214,0.0019499272,0.30353537,0.5514732,0.00014848566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005477165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006553397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041588163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003413332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08254045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394768444","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04981-w","title":"Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Novelty; Scopus; Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Creativity; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.89847556445197,"score_gpt":0.7359858661900647,"score_spread":0.1624896982619053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394768444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089454,0.007082843,0.012918822,0.021625604,0.0005220407,0.00018289458,0.00061011035,0.00015252279,0.047959745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343127,0.0012888362,0.0025023322,0.0010583479,0.00042397002,0.00006624769,0.00026339813,0.000033810527,0.000931825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267985,0.010093061,0.002722904,0.003528118,0.009013627,0.0019623565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.681436,0.16015357,0.094770275,0.022775868,0.024057321,0.016807035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02822958,0.00042771993,0.0010090581,0.008621292,0.00198568,0.007569002,0.0013997363,0.0030780858,0.0078164805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15182531,0.00034931602,0.0011028107,0.009500761,0.0034942015,0.0058774874,0.004244706,0.0022610903,0.0016557658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007943477,0.00068769656,0.8204942,0.0010957096,0.00106182,0.0012283074,0.0042710784,0.0006625384,0.003770218,0.031528763,0.0028245412,0.13158071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031059945,0.0013588317,0.7297847,0.0008725058,0.0010939458,0.0043653753,0.019499587,0.0027953607,0.006308223,0.19471389,0.038761895,0.000135119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069340254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010825451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002052124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031020094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14929408},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4394770097","doi":"10.32388/dzhu8l","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394770097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394793730","doi":"10.32388/pvhbsv","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394793730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394804157","doi":"10.32388/wkishy","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394804157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394841320","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0299319","title":"Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9301051811473721,"score_gpt":0.610114133390933,"score_spread":0.31999104775643905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394841320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843955,0.013774614,0.005459264,0.017050894,0.00043820843,0.00015884524,0.0011780837,0.00009906656,0.077445656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457574,0.0020450004,0.0014417934,0.00030518297,0.00009187081,0.000058100333,0.00028228172,0.00002297653,0.0011770751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97274333,0.012936328,0.0034129568,0.0036651702,0.0051509496,0.0020912886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82893544,0.06913242,0.057333585,0.012888904,0.018663285,0.013046258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031813912,0.00023195807,0.00077990576,0.012607972,0.0034691293,0.011537118,0.00083153695,0.0012850772,0.004375115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14835913,0.0004916649,0.00059677596,0.027773842,0.005175459,0.01740998,0.010117386,0.0015151694,0.0005854724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004038078,0.000096182135,0.70835114,0.0017343997,0.00067618437,0.00048999896,0.085747555,0.000985529,0.000745626,0.061225828,0.0053741033,0.13416956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046821206,0.00017036092,0.8017537,0.0012338704,0.00027404324,0.0007161397,0.08550664,0.00096990034,0.0005572426,0.03184192,0.07678245,0.00014691366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007564336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01392766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044918973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063015656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16825002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394856249","doi":"10.32388/hvv99g","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394856249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013844566,0.2068411,0.0017462374,0.44399962,0.23860638,0.00043853308,0.014194199,0.0006652151,0.09212427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031899642,0.36675936,0.0045669777,0.20548609,0.10930779,0.0006194325,0.019934963,0.0012814502,0.26014438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98884624,0.001153598,0.00057727715,0.0005520439,0.008287651,0.0005831703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89959615,0.010328428,0.0027022082,0.0015876844,0.08017819,0.005607356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01033,0.0010746077,0.0015913404,0.014484672,0.005347992,0.010579225,0.002948768,0.002957772,0.032593638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065809384,0.0004424542,0.00076148217,0.019870743,0.0039722207,0.0032550879,0.002404892,0.0025974987,0.014310189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067122915,0.000002410866,0.00010330521,0.00084067165,0.0000070991728,0.000013982601,0.00007636458,0.000029575629,0.000032529315,0.0010594456,0.9791084,0.018719567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034887898,0.0000033906413,0.0010360853,0.0015406937,0.000021220916,0.00001787062,0.00012853627,0.000031373394,0.00004359285,0.00032582178,0.99683654,0.0000112727075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5627524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74532783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026620759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117692724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8796452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394956624","doi":"10.32388/27obs0","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394956624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012457026,0.1379325,0.001467478,0.57545316,0.18475874,0.00064487767,0.018937958,0.0005898264,0.078969814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037414797,0.29449213,0.0067170803,0.21772218,0.07693318,0.00088129425,0.028267957,0.001194561,0.33637688],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675054,0.0016302784,0.00072165736,0.000553325,0.009670297,0.0006738242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8946857,0.008562319,0.0025528537,0.0013280037,0.08534257,0.0075285346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013435787,0.00089549186,0.0013200358,0.011028305,0.0045144404,0.008132417,0.0028796676,0.0031458014,0.04424969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074231006,0.00042177748,0.0009318019,0.011731431,0.003058843,0.0032126203,0.0024222224,0.0026163643,0.015021767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008375515,0.0000025036675,0.0001175623,0.0007956784,0.000007590309,0.000016941189,0.000058028912,0.000031433035,0.00003316686,0.0010194605,0.9797785,0.018130612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008013313,0.0000062937597,0.0015683143,0.00233346,0.000025727819,0.000025797523,0.00013768476,0.000046356912,0.000047864894,0.00032748084,0.9954568,0.000016168591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64619863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8058543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029771242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17539823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71176994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394970969","doi":"10.32388/fmqb3n","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394970969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018278158,0.14115943,0.002247207,0.45780528,0.21521172,0.0015704746,0.046646267,0.00102852,0.1325033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04648608,0.24384825,0.0104217185,0.15905343,0.06026314,0.002122821,0.05178986,0.001789586,0.42422512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985986,0.0023776994,0.0009948032,0.00064861675,0.009297148,0.00069566845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9059748,0.008603837,0.0026684143,0.0018163889,0.07454218,0.0063945055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153331915,0.0009479342,0.0016074873,0.014585086,0.0046312828,0.007817882,0.0031197858,0.0026411114,0.08830409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09412314,0.00045894503,0.0011381513,0.014243085,0.0023507925,0.003449061,0.0033730087,0.0021662011,0.022613162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009439711,0.0000022030472,0.00011249233,0.0012095963,0.000009300162,0.000019681798,0.00008254585,0.000029461666,0.000037594677,0.0012591283,0.97816455,0.019064039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008227431,0.0000054879,0.001348689,0.0032442473,0.000027514943,0.000023204579,0.00016180486,0.00004249658,0.000039599607,0.00031955462,0.99476457,0.000014705892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5801927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7390444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02796316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17447571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8445593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395011888","doi":"10.32388/aphl2q","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Physical geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395011888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027273276,0.022422941,0.0019678893,0.41619557,0.25441352,0.0014140953,0.06718141,0.0023908897,0.23128645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018329715,0.024549948,0.004808373,0.12540631,0.043377034,0.0009032701,0.036484458,0.0019457157,0.74419516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98654336,0.0010080144,0.00053728884,0.0004719992,0.010556946,0.0008823355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91095537,0.0073322994,0.0014125219,0.0014334159,0.07357596,0.0052904924],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010402688,0.0009748158,0.0011355365,0.01063287,0.0060370434,0.0078453,0.0025954032,0.0030898813,0.08778975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059391018,0.00043238103,0.0009411371,0.011692574,0.002223466,0.0028863845,0.0025461647,0.0025806269,0.040178854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035539063,0.0000015092036,0.000051757263,0.00009395206,0.0000014623879,0.000008600474,0.000025312214,0.000011725705,0.000022319893,0.00024337423,0.9960238,0.0035126214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006696503,0.0000050740805,0.0019029828,0.00032811036,0.000008329522,0.000009705905,0.00015631318,0.00004688045,0.000052587,0.00017268729,0.9972963,0.000014250588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72780776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8620898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020210821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113475494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54759043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395012246","doi":"10.32388/3afaf5","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395012246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030071","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11616","title":"The Top 100 Cited Articles Focusing on Acute Lung Injury and ARDS: Bibliometric and Visualization Analyses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Respiratory Care","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Commission of Jiangxi Province","keywords":"Medicine; ARDS; Visualization; Intensive care medicine; Lung; Internal medicine; Data mining","score_opus":0.4764789478124501,"score_gpt":0.614326852314032,"score_spread":0.13784790450158185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77904075,0.07480473,0.00838531,0.002313069,0.0003718956,0.0015075195,0.104120344,0.0015970278,0.027859235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92273265,0.02826064,0.017453589,0.0001285737,0.0003946098,0.001173867,0.02737686,0.0001145074,0.0023647982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942729,0.000961242,0.0015558249,0.00049817475,0.0023940955,0.00031773304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685014,0.018015428,0.006121002,0.0006945599,0.0059715416,0.00069598947],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057196775,0.0008652066,0.0017783424,0.16845976,0.0010815741,0.0040796064,0.00066189264,0.00049937604,0.005357934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03700674,0.00021261105,0.0018333191,0.16080365,0.00062925916,0.0021785663,0.0018670728,0.00039261006,0.001180213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005665718,0.00023602035,0.5418311,0.03256657,0.0028733895,0.0013132164,0.005740384,0.0034146628,0.005466084,0.0071725827,0.029912323,0.36890724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011279027,0.00029892047,0.881515,0.0055963336,0.004262748,0.0024621685,0.0107731875,0.009334925,0.00377555,0.008539752,0.07311696,0.00021167022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043865102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004582676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016776714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030662068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03024888},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4395039141","doi":"10.32388/a0r0as","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395039141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395110194","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2","title":"Mapping philanthropic support of science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Horizon 2020; McGill University; Division of Social and Economic Sciences; European Commission; John Templeton Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Science policy; Political science; Grant funding; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Public administration; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.48834292655917405,"score_gpt":0.5645723979618286,"score_spread":0.07622947140265451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395110194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804453,0.00086206093,0.0021859752,0.00047448342,0.000011788967,0.000025932872,0.0041778916,0.000046973277,0.011769572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995732,0.00039290794,0.0010510591,0.000016459018,0.000017245187,0.0000289522,0.002056179,0.000009554262,0.0006957606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975769,0.0009799884,0.00017982152,0.0003614305,0.0006205562,0.00028135008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986279,0.006922176,0.004287022,0.00075312913,0.0011479665,0.0006107206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017214525,0.00022333032,0.00046423494,0.015537586,0.0008021226,0.002147924,0.00042680185,0.00036630293,0.006101864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01921306,0.00013112529,0.00033391482,0.024037473,0.0006804496,0.0013660722,0.0025543033,0.00045834653,0.00084963866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024830914,0.000095855125,0.88409626,0.0005931022,0.00042680663,0.00026520013,0.003083504,0.00801752,0.0019155564,0.01664657,0.0046019107,0.08000935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020833604,0.000060492566,0.95628625,0.00010976553,0.000074767195,0.00032063434,0.0049656387,0.010215006,0.00066181057,0.007347871,0.019904606,0.000032316068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006557297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005968295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99827856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001148652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009859425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020412803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396539080","doi":"10.1515/9782760633964-008","title":"Le système universitaire canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.15787166763724966,"score_gpt":0.33956837966890135,"score_spread":0.1816967120316517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396539080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009951117,0.01847234,0.007362637,0.017166536,0.0011206581,0.00004439317,0.00076542376,0.00030963734,0.94480735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34933972,0.021177398,0.010241919,0.001869082,0.0010925131,0.00015246014,0.0011101098,0.00017939952,0.6148374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961205,0.000889983,0.00011060158,0.0005502621,0.0016326233,0.0006960459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986663,0.0003143397,0.000087489745,0.00021650163,0.0005161568,0.00019920334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021840099,0.00064414187,0.00080785225,0.0032386526,0.004349715,0.012916673,0.0010329108,0.002216824,0.037111286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004813577,0.0005162371,0.00056852493,0.00753305,0.005109694,0.004900627,0.0030849543,0.0039912886,0.0066517727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007609112,0.0000059678478,0.00029679193,0.000035351502,0.0000071230156,0.000028819506,0.00042175336,0.00043681578,0.000049894374,0.9619724,0.017295334,0.01944224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001613683,0.00000928231,0.0012498996,0.00008108535,0.000009142193,0.000089334855,0.00035655106,0.00071895076,0.00011296409,0.085911945,0.91142213,0.000022536611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4286202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24648795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99781597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032082815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016730374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8522507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396557051","doi":"10.32388/uobjiq","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396557051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008184248,0.13413972,0.0016496083,0.39731666,0.3458778,0.0012972606,0.03670621,0.0010564541,0.08113784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018277489,0.2558853,0.007083562,0.16639715,0.10137389,0.001962996,0.054610044,0.0021243189,0.39228523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854676,0.0021345303,0.0010810724,0.0006468646,0.009868698,0.00080128026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8770903,0.009486546,0.0028846757,0.002059861,0.099536546,0.008942118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015528355,0.0013042997,0.002413494,0.015890434,0.0044152685,0.008994269,0.003756343,0.0030560452,0.13039939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098231554,0.0006017049,0.0014156529,0.015892075,0.0024907438,0.0043351226,0.0039411536,0.002787546,0.04067222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006609064,0.0000020977889,0.000044638356,0.0010888393,0.000007459228,0.000012424656,0.00003513968,0.000015528185,0.000022017675,0.00041682928,0.9870331,0.011315202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009735988,0.0000057314614,0.000837457,0.0038415457,0.000028754303,0.000020711717,0.00010145491,0.00002712966,0.00003113811,0.0002345342,0.9948474,0.000014500909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3943095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59647864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022763101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13470972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7840287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396578295","doi":"10.32388/9r05v4","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396578295","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001449861,0.011793337,0.0023300843,0.47249892,0.31284484,0.0020662153,0.038833868,0.0018825307,0.15630049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01625045,0.014013238,0.005229084,0.09186728,0.04983268,0.0014078715,0.027823599,0.001589188,0.79198676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728872,0.003020944,0.0011968267,0.0012219606,0.01992958,0.0017435437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7882532,0.011854156,0.0031149192,0.0038735603,0.17314245,0.019761704],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023443995,0.0011723115,0.0021625885,0.007740902,0.0076577174,0.013111241,0.0043341597,0.0055409214,0.22864237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13385701,0.00059893704,0.0012594111,0.006775281,0.0035781343,0.0035314672,0.0042410735,0.0046241027,0.080644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010276352,0.0000033327165,0.00006811556,0.00015208372,0.0000043445557,0.000011440901,0.000031390176,0.000016563907,0.000023628701,0.0006809244,0.99218315,0.0068148575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019417585,0.0000066286957,0.0011243502,0.0004937144,0.00001936401,0.000013035852,0.00015703717,0.00009228816,0.000060695373,0.00055374956,0.9974412,0.00001840053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65298843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020544894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23974296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95342094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396596501","doi":"10.1177/21582440231205390","title":"Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Mohaghegh Ardabili; Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences; University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Open science; Scientific communication; Engineering ethics; Citation; Science communication; Expansive; Preprint; Data science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Science education","score_opus":0.9433554885989451,"score_gpt":0.7790298365108317,"score_spread":0.16432565208811345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396596501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005070144,0.9532664,0.0040213717,0.017304009,0.0027657084,0.000053676995,0.00006385063,0.00009918461,0.02191882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046494757,0.97881806,0.004684396,0.0039791055,0.0043807602,0.00009978416,0.000081007056,0.00006329072,0.0032441488],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933728,0.002942476,0.00083415635,0.00050599995,0.001828271,0.00051635975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98635185,0.010074526,0.00068901305,0.00049432716,0.0015465964,0.0008436459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006046241,0.0011729833,0.0013002539,0.017299624,0.0043857167,0.013520283,0.001212917,0.0067406693,0.0070314608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009798373,0.000685232,0.00094840623,0.02101546,0.0074360133,0.020974588,0.005607981,0.007759751,0.0039573275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049924693,0.00013314953,0.0010852191,0.012592653,0.000052398427,0.00026852093,0.008867628,0.00037955903,0.00055222376,0.24679507,0.116980225,0.61224353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032214741,0.00004151019,0.00097393023,0.008363282,0.000022743276,0.00047120944,0.002160764,0.00009717499,0.000077546436,0.05195372,0.9358072,0.00002772542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024945198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003060612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004495048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085033355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032614052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396624268","doi":"10.32388/44kcvv","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396624268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022359968,0.14593263,0.002336406,0.47047237,0.22830212,0.001070161,0.032918163,0.0008208407,0.1159113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047639094,0.2688481,0.010759412,0.12931238,0.060390446,0.0013610027,0.042186745,0.0017944446,0.4377084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847216,0.0022788544,0.0010303207,0.0006807105,0.010541915,0.0007466235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88311625,0.010699737,0.0030412872,0.001871817,0.0936259,0.0076450766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016830318,0.0008977554,0.0015115393,0.013710806,0.004588494,0.008431092,0.002734729,0.002424016,0.07409908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09777117,0.000448515,0.0010466913,0.014510049,0.0024870369,0.0036274628,0.0031768961,0.0022729966,0.019145882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011069319,0.000002605844,0.00014953162,0.0013277757,0.000012409447,0.00002654875,0.000109079,0.000037079717,0.000057069243,0.0014592801,0.97454405,0.022263544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075586013,0.0000071439363,0.0016930546,0.0034082206,0.000032998338,0.000029697418,0.00021370214,0.0000467997,0.000054868487,0.00032310895,0.9941658,0.00001708855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5385909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7319237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02668288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17937933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396659980","doi":"10.1111/cid.13335","title":"25 years of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (CIDRR): A modern bibliometric and Altmetrics network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Dentistry; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Dental implant; Implant; Data science; Library science; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.7031867908895583,"score_gpt":0.6734345478697609,"score_spread":0.029752243019797397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396659980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7441823,0.0932282,0.03161502,0.004855823,0.00055671117,0.0016336603,0.08640124,0.0013444718,0.03618255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325868,0.016768254,0.025442654,0.00017225841,0.0005036748,0.0010097066,0.021704154,0.000109648136,0.0017028217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928076,0.002035933,0.0023403119,0.0012679944,0.0046514664,0.0004235398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95913786,0.020970842,0.01200911,0.0016915761,0.0052349465,0.0009556011],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012258208,0.0008072401,0.0015146356,0.1091677,0.0012899793,0.00586329,0.00092637155,0.00066151994,0.004689372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045548055,0.00031950563,0.001968642,0.1252744,0.0010077073,0.0040513854,0.0030786917,0.00063410733,0.0009779475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044836788,0.00016311307,0.6955053,0.010673866,0.0027555143,0.0006011816,0.0027100607,0.0036260383,0.001104745,0.009911208,0.016483545,0.25601694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054426822,0.0005242276,0.8378577,0.0035850634,0.0028850592,0.001745024,0.005476745,0.022279192,0.0018321298,0.013441618,0.11012955,0.00018929297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045247874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042114207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8908323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023084031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040221782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064828336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396671953","doi":"10.1007/s10649-024-10328-2","title":"Editorial: paper collections, research retrieval, serendipity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Scholarship; Theme (computing); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6746776339002679,"score_gpt":0.6727593335651447,"score_spread":0.0019183003351231909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396671953","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020097488,0.0032415173,0.00009281568,0.015860679,0.97995996,0.000020655025,0.000050046146,0.00004903667,0.0007052811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021008881,0.0019730492,0.00008201884,0.00507369,0.98912966,0.000023518183,0.000028630868,0.000030621235,0.0034488223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98338205,0.00302817,0.0027252117,0.0020869877,0.007825697,0.0009519177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91614956,0.028783115,0.004861055,0.0023834691,0.03809334,0.0097294655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02057201,0.008305184,0.010598794,0.016849313,0.00705231,0.019682255,0.007960726,0.027818652,0.029794397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074724585,0.0029439097,0.006281622,0.0062811067,0.0051027588,0.007022846,0.0033208192,0.020579895,0.017739514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043476182,0.000017391525,0.00002050374,0.00029081848,0.00003108727,0.00007776033,0.0000068887525,0.000019913543,0.000039470913,0.0001531854,0.9961124,0.00318715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035070968,0.000056412653,0.0005848663,0.0011856274,0.00027625257,0.0005308358,0.000079693855,0.0004776051,0.00019486611,0.0023213723,0.99388653,0.00005529811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030112409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008278466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029794397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077986573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006447507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10879648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396803880","doi":"10.32388/0tcepl","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396803880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035317265,0.27789378,0.001635719,0.39527938,0.15706228,0.0008934178,0.03808826,0.0008014237,0.124813974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050479013,0.41899484,0.0053493357,0.13402763,0.046683565,0.0009755154,0.032464407,0.0011169347,0.30990875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893526,0.001126193,0.0008455656,0.00045214174,0.007608044,0.00061543955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91794777,0.009428036,0.0027552536,0.0012227425,0.06354803,0.005098073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009387981,0.000871646,0.0014879473,0.021489158,0.0046891407,0.0095345955,0.0024596585,0.002469311,0.036116928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06494757,0.0004109743,0.00094280374,0.031934842,0.002598219,0.0033859806,0.0026974806,0.0017965509,0.0121962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012443848,0.0000037209913,0.0002542156,0.002395139,0.000013075063,0.000040000687,0.0002002445,0.00003739399,0.0000776223,0.0009577501,0.9666908,0.029317643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004178236,0.0000064512965,0.0026281872,0.003873943,0.00003093139,0.000034589888,0.0002905097,0.000031359614,0.000058415517,0.00017591592,0.9928509,0.000014551051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6412376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79398495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99061203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029903952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13975963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7217504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396885512","doi":"10.22215/adr/23.01fs","title":"RESEARCH REVIEW : Research for a Changing World: From research chairs to groundbreaking projects, our innovative faculty are responding to the questions and challenges of today.From research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.9714501093655866,"score_gpt":0.7501551133869951,"score_spread":0.22129499597859148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396885512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036259317,0.14866118,0.0018570338,0.7569278,0.024848554,0.00022567062,0.0016640018,0.0005031739,0.06168676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06624827,0.45734483,0.016762095,0.19020702,0.07234121,0.00088760955,0.005175172,0.0010876481,0.18994606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625876,0.013623611,0.0028405474,0.0021166545,0.016519185,0.0023124008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8154989,0.071309194,0.011197196,0.007110713,0.058355045,0.036528934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04000557,0.0009267159,0.0016660199,0.007573118,0.0053409403,0.030572332,0.0012743251,0.008700632,0.027245738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11364662,0.000660955,0.0009974778,0.014254169,0.003454431,0.017416548,0.0051549943,0.00659375,0.017768942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045117296,0.00003932327,0.001235204,0.0010016152,0.000020207071,0.000085718406,0.00038305053,0.00005190251,0.00047479197,0.014776093,0.9217141,0.060172737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023840856,0.000062929685,0.004209199,0.0017347884,0.000037670827,0.0001982057,0.0013922584,0.0001106998,0.0005780902,0.010193195,0.9814198,0.000039336584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010428254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03642716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97275424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097275665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04985316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21157217},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4396932075","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-01437-2","title":"I’m worried I’ve been contacted by a predatory publisher — how do I find out?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.27653534100049176,"score_gpt":0.5217601496840361,"score_spread":0.2452248086835443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396932075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042226955,0.015058538,0.0036799842,0.8316766,0.013621422,0.000074593736,0.0015971165,0.00043180826,0.09163299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.427314,0.040204965,0.010171796,0.32642642,0.02510587,0.00030027365,0.003383318,0.0013479373,0.16574536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843514,0.0047705523,0.0016216283,0.0011845578,0.006998499,0.001073449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86060685,0.060806938,0.025526982,0.00660025,0.035653267,0.010805601],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013170549,0.00043970984,0.0010268585,0.007968574,0.004990299,0.017187363,0.0013432162,0.0053761955,0.028146101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17024685,0.00053850195,0.0006406741,0.013643675,0.0037657733,0.018860014,0.0025193682,0.005739921,0.017855326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007893717,0.000112810005,0.08335366,0.0008363479,0.0001860139,0.0013767943,0.011982457,0.00007272303,0.00052332826,0.01264314,0.6899333,0.19890049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029510742,0.0000617607,0.038731858,0.0024059268,0.00019298944,0.003893764,0.054963995,0.00050935626,0.00092659483,0.024465745,0.8736261,0.00019233643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009956742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017032474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036677662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065438948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09415805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397019241","doi":"10.1515/9782760640795-005","title":"Les problèmes récurrents du financement universitaire au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.15056011853705736,"score_gpt":0.3490336984590258,"score_spread":0.19847357992196846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397019241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63699466,0.05734925,0.012651387,0.08253081,0.0010048917,0.00009106287,0.0047642556,0.00021861643,0.20439515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9143772,0.010797262,0.0029663714,0.0005875855,0.00037878772,0.000044263594,0.00077846524,0.00003858218,0.07003141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840814,0.00027505006,0.00008665058,0.0002324924,0.000598657,0.0003990837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953257,0.0016847149,0.0005845564,0.00017026559,0.0018392692,0.00039543712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002327941,0.0003850321,0.001051051,0.0031692747,0.0052104774,0.006597377,0.0018739366,0.0024921552,0.012198821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013604541,0.0003269768,0.0004613151,0.0073056337,0.0022556526,0.0026507415,0.0011402518,0.0024162005,0.0006640539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002671796,0.00015875517,0.05450886,0.00054744346,0.00018021376,0.0016491545,0.0067251087,0.025257519,0.0006449691,0.560719,0.08795366,0.26138806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013554393,0.00012034953,0.17559178,0.0015998501,0.000259573,0.0013827656,0.029644908,0.095153175,0.0013916782,0.21128055,0.483236,0.0002038158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9324625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9228159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032911986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020148039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23879427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397290146","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.18648","title":"Call for papers: Current issues in scholarly publishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.2731512417955865,"score_gpt":0.4780085867536388,"score_spread":0.2048573449580523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397290146","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003482632,0.04383659,0.0007398662,0.31882554,0.52030295,0.00032328884,0.0024794154,0.0012486364,0.111895405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047222516,0.0480222,0.00240922,0.060292345,0.24877675,0.00040465698,0.005154469,0.0024297223,0.6277884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608358,0.003440478,0.0029614272,0.0017790452,0.027925111,0.003058141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8464944,0.01873971,0.0060812044,0.0051922025,0.062071554,0.06142093],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037941705,0.0026332026,0.0032034137,0.015991,0.013882411,0.06652717,0.007324488,0.019806823,0.32189327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11827018,0.0014671079,0.0022242873,0.025992319,0.005624411,0.0318975,0.009230208,0.010337612,0.21831925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008360865,0.000008013129,0.000029434848,0.00017588817,0.0000016958611,0.00001353331,0.00003345855,0.0000054362035,0.000020227575,0.001224035,0.98335475,0.015125249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009864462,0.0000071619247,0.00020075134,0.00026034558,0.0000034890588,0.000019324605,0.00016056628,0.00001633625,0.000019522939,0.001270067,0.9980216,0.00001101002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021098385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047644895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017989982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04486946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96723694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398141597","doi":"10.32388/7rc4sy","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398141597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398246959","doi":"10.1200/go.23.00287","title":"Global Landscape of the Attack of Predatory Journals in Oncology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JCO Global Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Genentech; European Society for Medical Oncology","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Psychological intervention; Descriptive statistics; Medicine; Clinical Oncology; Odds ratio; Feeling; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical education; Political science; Internal medicine; Cancer; Social psychology; Nursing; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.5602366891606101,"score_gpt":0.6480163093402614,"score_spread":0.08777962017965135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398246959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90518963,0.023768937,0.00094710046,0.046595007,0.00031058345,0.00008145823,0.00055584504,0.00006997044,0.022481471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99165946,0.005618553,0.00043448168,0.0014514934,0.00031935412,0.000017566636,0.000085082065,0.000017064549,0.0003969687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866649,0.008690636,0.0009652229,0.00094819226,0.0018655271,0.0008655181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86976033,0.05377067,0.057588466,0.0042614858,0.0056124674,0.009006607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009681561,0.00021600748,0.00038909126,0.004066849,0.0016765426,0.005241084,0.0007836617,0.0011642571,0.006568959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050524123,0.0002806845,0.00032960926,0.005892454,0.00527779,0.0042943694,0.0038589744,0.0013497422,0.0005968735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017704302,0.00013811023,0.8542322,0.0020350737,0.00015750677,0.0019507783,0.030522255,0.00034213724,0.00057107967,0.0077453097,0.0084792925,0.09364926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003218731,0.00042929387,0.8684908,0.0027652464,0.00011286406,0.006060822,0.06419282,0.00061079295,0.00040611136,0.0060547157,0.05073416,0.000110010114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019970236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027733464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99883574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013613086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025343697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05120164},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4398453333","doi":"10.7910/dvn/hgihgc/38uvjq","title":"meta analysis - correlations.R","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.6242485153176885,"score_gpt":0.5224753220057434,"score_spread":0.10177319331194512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398453333","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007871739,0.0004514651,0.009510682,0.00038911897,0.00012443206,0.0005454813,0.9695375,0.01654229,0.002111862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0131559605,0.0008915896,0.105280206,0.0011241429,0.0001303574,0.015264537,0.8382192,0.019062465,0.0068714623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930311,0.002478487,0.0013356594,0.001760458,0.0010144925,0.0003798236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94925207,0.037533876,0.002849315,0.006680478,0.0031571,0.00052704563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893877,0.003490569,0.0034997135,0.008431606,0.0010113814,0.003572919,0.0036172282,0.0013398986,0.17265068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06572317,0.0022450662,0.0048694923,0.007954936,0.0007285817,0.0020350737,0.0031428032,0.003134882,0.07004223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033374756,0.000072555,0.0026768325,0.007619501,0.0016541008,0.000084969666,0.00012106145,0.0015435813,0.00048656357,0.0042249616,0.96290976,0.018272387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036314973,0.00016342125,0.009882686,0.0027775601,0.002890111,0.00030793468,0.00012977814,0.005997236,0.0021520269,0.03969613,0.93204385,0.00032784135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006759755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012845589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17265068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015770355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005477469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398481290","doi":"10.7910/dvn/ahmb8g/cuowp6","title":"Journal Editors Supplementary 2 - Survey.docx","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4029767155916954,"score_gpt":0.5055364608877881,"score_spread":0.10255974529609274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398481290","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042140746,0.00002285945,0.00003386114,0.00006699534,0.000041878615,0.000012122572,0.99871814,0.00014200846,0.00092004414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004329043,0.00006193172,0.00023862817,0.0001283457,0.00005056677,0.00014100145,0.9954318,0.00018368216,0.0033311031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977512,0.00033098736,0.00041489903,0.0005320136,0.0005880037,0.00038286424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984736,0.0053875647,0.0016211761,0.0020427878,0.0049984907,0.0012139836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002105048,0.0017761219,0.0016917451,0.009179883,0.0007530959,0.0048991414,0.002211679,0.0015713255,0.51266825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025870029,0.000954052,0.0010766027,0.015995061,0.0005078524,0.0025403048,0.0024624986,0.0016050242,0.3439236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002674813,0.000009281201,0.00038813794,0.00036952694,0.000010312008,0.0000057092366,0.0000067534925,0.000052682724,0.000023983455,0.00022415894,0.9975998,0.0012829385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888936,0.000016670307,0.0033962552,0.00040290455,0.000021458894,0.000026840533,0.00007342431,0.00013469091,0.00016802087,0.0012919747,0.9941571,0.000021810089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013258794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02315194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99789494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017695592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035450477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6951196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398755802","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20241032","title":"Teaching-Track Faculty at US National Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Fast track; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3531765029643348,"score_gpt":0.5248627467509461,"score_spread":0.17168624378661135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398755802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803632,0.0009433702,0.00021629667,0.0025798834,0.000041129886,0.000031234336,0.0006306234,0.00003177471,0.015162563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914647,0.0009778211,0.0004034424,0.00048544852,0.000020553898,0.000020339563,0.00026001415,0.000013647446,0.006354159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594694,0.0009846267,0.00027647856,0.00037809287,0.0014962693,0.0009175385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98037213,0.004147931,0.0030069856,0.00057631393,0.005156968,0.006739759],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039968295,0.00009751146,0.00033579738,0.0020701038,0.005673886,0.003763586,0.0009122256,0.00051307934,0.0094919475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020395221,0.00018856913,0.00014918574,0.0071783904,0.0012414432,0.0017027361,0.0019492732,0.0005359238,0.00091942755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026390995,0.00039097993,0.7073467,0.000305056,0.00004535029,0.00047817003,0.096543424,0.00048314765,0.0018397644,0.006506304,0.014224824,0.17157234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022791788,0.00022337712,0.6297543,0.00035697845,0.00003760276,0.0003707803,0.30177036,0.000468063,0.0019322787,0.0011593224,0.06385842,0.00004578619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19313897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50492126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99600315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014469085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02333887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3840295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398772376","doi":"10.32388/80amlu","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398772376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011323682,0.056413524,0.001602067,0.5458086,0.25703064,0.00068109407,0.01638546,0.00092474325,0.120021425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020227596,0.081250735,0.0049901186,0.24606293,0.11601511,0.0008486773,0.0154795265,0.0009943565,0.514131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837413,0.0018913117,0.00083230657,0.00072294497,0.011857337,0.0009549183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870996,0.014173758,0.0030124504,0.002404914,0.10203471,0.0073781186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017226439,0.0012057372,0.0015559833,0.013410629,0.0063903066,0.012193902,0.0036508956,0.0049448125,0.051351387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968508,0.0004882472,0.0009389615,0.014372037,0.0038593777,0.0038180107,0.0027605128,0.0038689005,0.021798115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006160823,0.0000034637417,0.000066241286,0.00022522004,0.0000037360408,0.00000774842,0.00003592852,0.000020612955,0.000018079696,0.0008030525,0.9899789,0.008830929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772848,0.0000048063634,0.001565724,0.00070188247,0.000023670116,0.000010127934,0.00013091923,0.00006714978,0.000055476998,0.0007520483,0.9966653,0.000014138952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6290781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026821354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15228936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74621266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398872514","doi":"10.7910/dvn/qkcpxu/wxmihz","title":"menage.xlsx","year":2013,"lang":"id","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.37656219518512885,"score_gpt":0.4876267573558552,"score_spread":0.11106456217072636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398872514","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038796188,0.00002905908,0.000020111791,0.00006180611,0.000015176123,0.000007916615,0.99894863,0.00027168167,0.00060678856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005341259,0.00014852714,0.00031881995,0.00008863067,0.000037334536,0.00019682842,0.9964864,0.00034258675,0.001846755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.00027949814,0.00045653127,0.0005402524,0.0006348526,0.0004460808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99170226,0.003646908,0.0011401067,0.0015543618,0.0012034854,0.00075286336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020131231,0.0030972194,0.002676979,0.012647533,0.0012371836,0.008362055,0.0031803076,0.0026785415,0.50487983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018082498,0.0014947135,0.0016026548,0.026063215,0.0011378321,0.003728908,0.004825344,0.0029773656,0.36996433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004688798,0.000021519356,0.0005631899,0.0012231915,0.00003296786,0.000017547143,0.000034607663,0.00009345049,0.0000628518,0.0005394363,0.99580646,0.0015578427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003537711,0.000016045622,0.0023405666,0.0004780362,0.000030194913,0.000032779553,0.000099368735,0.00013746129,0.00025451303,0.0013628904,0.99486333,0.00003099196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013000425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018426012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49512017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021898544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053690937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70622885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399025610","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.05.012","title":"The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Normalization (sociology); Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4586648364662728,"score_gpt":0.5918024455882914,"score_spread":0.1331376091220186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399025610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702706,0.003089674,0.001563366,0.00063380634,0.000048216407,0.0000697198,0.017406162,0.00010691862,0.0068115625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98093355,0.0020248785,0.0018164124,0.00005650561,0.000058384696,0.00008480046,0.014379608,0.000034582816,0.0006113502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434066,0.0015240347,0.0012315043,0.00089529826,0.0014629546,0.0005455683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95942193,0.020655379,0.010012595,0.0023172551,0.0064110095,0.0011818241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005911963,0.00036671732,0.00086533965,0.04341211,0.0007510512,0.0036120503,0.00051201263,0.00058197184,0.0020979694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03708541,0.00020611507,0.0011967409,0.07338384,0.0008014945,0.0024899952,0.0020627729,0.000500205,0.00067094143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015649985,0.000046509434,0.94455117,0.0007436969,0.00048873306,0.0003988294,0.0017690936,0.0037858489,0.00038825878,0.0017108307,0.004836793,0.041123845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014785259,0.00004932501,0.97891164,0.00020992747,0.00016486026,0.00042906025,0.002941874,0.0038329645,0.00033408267,0.00079912576,0.012277985,0.000034396337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068253577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047071236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99408805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012702135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015412985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031265795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399408566","doi":"10.1515/9782760625648-019","title":"Quand les citoyens québécois font la science","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.16268470186247194,"score_gpt":0.35972582926575014,"score_spread":0.1970411274032782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399408566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028722294,0.038506128,0.001808473,0.08335859,0.0042589097,0.00004905061,0.00082833326,0.00012344158,0.84234476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17130682,0.014899096,0.0015045294,0.008302396,0.00062946475,0.00005969593,0.00026735288,0.00009394613,0.8029367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984334,0.00019060749,0.000030605373,0.00023214798,0.00069218175,0.00042098534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989122,0.00020838939,0.00007959344,0.000063114254,0.0005306616,0.00020608299],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012718606,0.0005492679,0.00043283837,0.0015756185,0.008801158,0.01182797,0.0007359736,0.0032644395,0.029038621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003271637,0.000411592,0.00043981674,0.003336252,0.0062047783,0.005640919,0.0012860071,0.0042877584,0.0030842272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000888062,0.000022909055,0.0030418576,0.00016315977,0.000040954317,0.0006214159,0.010327561,0.0002869389,0.0011492771,0.76617754,0.15265627,0.06542337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016093218,0.00000882736,0.0043140575,0.00016033911,0.0000164482,0.000114237846,0.002832362,0.00009366046,0.00029008364,0.010340263,0.98178375,0.000029924293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99119884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036458187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047702156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26452392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399808942","doi":"10.1177/14740222241261034","title":"Valuing humanities: Rethinking the humanities-impact landscape in Denmark","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Face (sociological concept); Linguistic landscape; Social science; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6344845298545373,"score_gpt":0.547085083257939,"score_spread":0.08739944659659826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399808942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7962826,0.0077862185,0.008767126,0.014957868,0.00030206083,0.000081320744,0.0005051326,0.00006352538,0.17125416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561596,0.0007999265,0.00093713735,0.0001917166,0.000010708329,0.0000097448665,0.00005477075,0.000025132162,0.0023550307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847259,0.008282216,0.0009936617,0.001384591,0.0031298203,0.0014837659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746208,0.018245189,0.0019575208,0.0017312012,0.0018145809,0.0016307425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020603511,0.00024670988,0.0005957525,0.008532975,0.00964098,0.028796466,0.0014035827,0.0017649687,0.0027603447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025921213,0.0004977806,0.00030828515,0.01070412,0.022169348,0.010612693,0.014588636,0.0022867597,0.00029180484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012298662,0.000036387482,0.020794345,0.0005667385,0.000038612194,0.0012278031,0.57205665,0.0015046657,0.0010267517,0.36449033,0.0023511345,0.035783608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010729966,0.000041875956,0.031091968,0.0010214292,0.00003428478,0.00028843904,0.66850626,0.0010714076,0.0011228758,0.067300685,0.22941326,0.00009674576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05315861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07354058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030210914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015973296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21919656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839637","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-005","title":"4 Association canadienne-française pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.18127892601113552,"score_gpt":0.3533441170281054,"score_spread":0.1720651910169699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008036444,0.06054738,0.002324449,0.105073065,0.01120065,0.000072021016,0.0018544137,0.00017078282,0.81072086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12692276,0.0289577,0.003289051,0.015921846,0.0039198636,0.00017696127,0.0015550443,0.00018438055,0.81907237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950524,0.0010699845,0.00021358738,0.0005557953,0.001938033,0.0011701485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863369,0.0028775476,0.001136306,0.0007098571,0.0071607777,0.0017785607],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053812945,0.0006921501,0.00043642113,0.00580968,0.0058056796,0.0073117716,0.0007564343,0.004007999,0.060942534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011977463,0.0002877421,0.0007963038,0.008657849,0.003079608,0.00326812,0.0031210778,0.0033673213,0.013056246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006864228,0.000050366198,0.014752298,0.00029214495,0.000045635392,0.00026972068,0.002541364,0.00014725288,0.00021627295,0.3317932,0.5591729,0.09065024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004685143,0.0000071130576,0.0066325436,0.00016038706,0.0000101892565,0.00011771458,0.00028660553,0.000034608485,0.000031454518,0.0039264215,0.9887761,0.000012195908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3224399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46176684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93905747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113164475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026524879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64112616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839761","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-021","title":"20 Association canadienne-français pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.1796691582606232,"score_gpt":0.35241829399144176,"score_spread":0.17274913573081854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012280157,0.06013654,0.0026701237,0.2909567,0.047969807,0.0005905224,0.0048025413,0.00037578368,0.5802177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11378874,0.042040337,0.0050055967,0.057786427,0.01033975,0.0013635947,0.0066731516,0.00040206563,0.76260036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98465246,0.0039344924,0.0010913826,0.0013673627,0.0050725667,0.0038817143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255738,0.010154179,0.0046890676,0.0040457384,0.029929852,0.025607215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014038716,0.0009860204,0.0009882965,0.004323842,0.0068319933,0.008054567,0.0017385226,0.007207911,0.14184386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034597345,0.00046482522,0.0011230155,0.0049406076,0.0032245282,0.0035188908,0.006692179,0.0064352965,0.032628283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013154303,0.0001564969,0.017788112,0.00061720837,0.000060410126,0.00029062515,0.0010372417,0.00010085137,0.00042182396,0.03117332,0.8579742,0.09024834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013691367,0.000017246184,0.01296015,0.0004249822,0.000008580259,0.00011474524,0.00038163393,0.0000495483,0.000036922826,0.00090842583,0.98506445,0.00001960532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22903904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29848847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85815614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011983321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07704719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47451496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839812","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-051","title":"50 Association canadienne-française pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art","score_opus":0.17993925600474356,"score_gpt":0.35299938014194615,"score_spread":0.1730601241372026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010156503,0.109948434,0.00079669454,0.047690947,0.012635123,0.000047522266,0.00033702527,0.000114624,0.82741404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015089689,0.037748273,0.0007660607,0.007507679,0.0025964186,0.00006607135,0.00029987068,0.00009085443,0.9358351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745363,0.0004284848,0.00009237419,0.0003008813,0.0011768481,0.0005478372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957955,0.0009608181,0.00022494717,0.00024303947,0.0020162878,0.000759414],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024197313,0.0010111545,0.00045001454,0.0044311224,0.0055123367,0.008912841,0.00090075645,0.004113407,0.08473112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053291665,0.00035110605,0.0005356713,0.008290564,0.0044558635,0.0044137933,0.0034518156,0.004040422,0.028236868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016049107,0.000023169947,0.0008837746,0.00018774273,0.000008372565,0.00007909296,0.0011165492,0.00007021712,0.00012442145,0.14594233,0.7983672,0.053181026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010011698,0.0000016852428,0.00052414066,0.000092713424,0.0000014212283,0.000028767468,0.000100593796,0.000010251802,0.000008121004,0.0011044423,0.9981242,0.0000027216745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2743257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40460214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017143704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024303626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5454579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399859124","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2370144","title":"Exploring the structure of relative age effects research using citation network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sports Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Nipissing University; Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Citation analysis; Age structure; Citation; Network analysis; Computer science; Psychology; Demography; Engineering; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.8128957515660077,"score_gpt":0.620776158146938,"score_spread":0.1921195934190697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399859124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9033399,0.01494958,0.048844498,0.001604271,0.00015771497,0.0003201063,0.005943391,0.00033481445,0.02450573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98408777,0.0026705705,0.009949183,0.000056930618,0.00009459086,0.0001404959,0.0017834638,0.00004078348,0.0011763152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263364,0.0024758514,0.0013161367,0.0014411719,0.0016685894,0.00046468037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021706,0.07189972,0.0140614845,0.0035954886,0.0073821195,0.00089057843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011075539,0.0005129126,0.0009550565,0.052536916,0.0011537414,0.0047639455,0.0008906955,0.00073165185,0.0040251096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067931436,0.00033493317,0.0010982188,0.049057417,0.001140482,0.005508997,0.002415921,0.00064531184,0.00052200386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018616322,0.00006574713,0.8349518,0.0020973042,0.0018062177,0.00055059954,0.007834842,0.008224437,0.0030234396,0.043197677,0.001804682,0.09625712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039172304,0.00017752168,0.8289632,0.0010424512,0.0017283575,0.0009903045,0.008009382,0.051561497,0.003985584,0.0707373,0.03264289,0.0001223281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007047617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071534184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98892444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020243959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017278806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058573782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228654","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0087","title":"Tens of Thousands of American Academics on the Editorial Boards of Journals Run by Predatory Publishers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Advertising; Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.40426981837671777,"score_gpt":0.5168890013989549,"score_spread":0.11261918302223711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401754,0.005003701,0.0013631994,0.01202776,0.0011436618,0.00012219284,0.0017684839,0.00020999933,0.038185667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967754,0.0033872458,0.0018718839,0.0027728307,0.0015595669,0.000076229815,0.00077423296,0.000025935422,0.02177793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921476,0.001574384,0.00074955914,0.0006904509,0.004414806,0.00042314085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439226,0.023497893,0.020105455,0.0023928564,0.005147008,0.004934213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00628548,0.00030643877,0.0002908494,0.003520652,0.0025260563,0.0027297956,0.00047755492,0.0008456938,0.011533443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029024815,0.00041784978,0.00018914501,0.006125759,0.0016268502,0.0017846139,0.0015471389,0.00095311983,0.0037473105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005159299,0.00020990742,0.763858,0.00039824736,0.00009722191,0.0018659177,0.013460583,0.00026881718,0.0032107763,0.0038666215,0.069606386,0.14264156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044777822,0.00020557236,0.79705,0.00028401686,0.000068573434,0.0030186144,0.018402493,0.0010149726,0.0024979196,0.002674538,0.17467082,0.00006771174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023851458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00795445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012710921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012628963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03858322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400491789","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24309987","title":"What’s in a name? Protocol for a bibliometric and content analysis of rehabilitation, reablement, reactivation, and restorative health care services","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; Sinai Health System; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Rehabilitation; Content analysis; Medicine; Sociology; Physical therapy; Alternative medicine; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5592799480167934,"score_gpt":0.6063755701848107,"score_spread":0.047095622168017326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400491789","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013645064,0.00027878024,0.0069968076,0.0011482299,0.00049275375,0.9775354,0.010105306,0.00040922977,0.0016689728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00066288566,0.000087069464,0.0063821967,0.00014946394,0.000034498746,0.9915503,0.0007176603,0.000021133195,0.00039469908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91673815,0.0352495,0.0277413,0.0051981215,0.012065133,0.0030076902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76108867,0.07369979,0.030032646,0.03439594,0.09574884,0.0050341934],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11394179,0.004245976,0.010149499,0.028937085,0.0058071907,0.006869019,0.0045015006,0.0058805584,0.088072166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19913924,0.0035465336,0.01011707,0.025897037,0.004489069,0.008539836,0.0059191105,0.0059239995,0.020691179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019102333,0.0042375415,0.004679919,0.20692386,0.0017688404,0.001891733,0.021960774,0.0033273315,0.008538695,0.02874421,0.34602845,0.3527963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023655564,0.0037085859,0.03068711,0.0635563,0.002064206,0.000494555,0.01657731,0.0052228095,0.009619005,0.04488531,0.7979461,0.0015831614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044016778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00638026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009604357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054195117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.602589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400603791","doi":"10.1057/s41599-024-03402-w","title":"A global perspective on social stratification in science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities and Social Sciences Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Social stratification; Stratification (seeds); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.8418635650661227,"score_gpt":0.6485417079199942,"score_spread":0.19332185714612848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400603791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842917,0.0024679662,0.016584592,0.008445436,0.000110376015,0.00004179237,0.0006757779,0.00007448136,0.08730787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978066,0.00038876786,0.0008642244,0.00012119753,0.00005531745,0.000010482737,0.00009031088,0.0000076259244,0.0006554095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990376,0.00035600094,0.000034079763,0.00019796642,0.00014959859,0.00022484518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965172,0.0012345031,0.0008568875,0.0003771199,0.00040524628,0.0006091444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020074884,0.00025040226,0.00052546285,0.0038948616,0.0015246731,0.003349317,0.00029230522,0.0005011401,0.0055474434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005045455,0.00013210281,0.00032831624,0.004563548,0.0037279516,0.0037058864,0.0032508718,0.0009248741,0.0004084872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013739034,0.00008329522,0.35478702,0.00019233552,0.0001593239,0.0003315915,0.017516732,0.0074063465,0.0017548762,0.5321102,0.0031599298,0.08236098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023163191,0.00015040376,0.4329114,0.00028562857,0.00008095673,0.00027644605,0.019012008,0.008959307,0.00064137793,0.49496222,0.042631127,0.000066054854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040275245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004864877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018053873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009625216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018558025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400764333","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2024-0033","title":"On increasing equity and inclusion of early-career professionals for conferences and conference networking in Canadian fisheries and aquatic science societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Algoma University; University of New Brunswick; University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University; Trent University; Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Equity (law); Fishery; Inclusion (mineral); Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Social science","score_opus":0.4086659153645837,"score_gpt":0.4795522297439904,"score_spread":0.07088631437940673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400764333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43148014,0.007544922,0.0049945326,0.2939186,0.0017673143,0.0008631593,0.00093441014,0.0001804237,0.2583166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97533333,0.0019178508,0.0031743438,0.010182258,0.0001655265,0.00022131354,0.0002649974,0.000053708205,0.00868652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.963239,0.011230568,0.00089185254,0.0017094077,0.010463076,0.012466052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157313,0.012487827,0.004541649,0.0021810946,0.015697833,0.049360316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041980393,0.00039900327,0.0006094545,0.007482822,0.025331711,0.016104378,0.0037570107,0.0021427036,0.014387237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08699217,0.00035514834,0.0005568115,0.0080713285,0.0072544897,0.007808427,0.024659794,0.003383039,0.0005694219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002594824,0.00032556907,0.14946225,0.0010881107,0.00010270119,0.0007452517,0.15109016,0.00043005415,0.0013816536,0.1203762,0.12330402,0.45143458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013002043,0.00013819725,0.29815367,0.0023899726,0.00011703195,0.00026655092,0.26053795,0.00097422797,0.00064060616,0.026686734,0.40977576,0.0001893176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74692017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9016812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06144799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1999992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5091405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400876817","doi":"10.3138/jammi-2024-0209","title":"If a tree falls in the forest: Publication inflation in infectious diseases","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Inflation (cosmology); Forestry; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05035293740498988,"score_gpt":0.39548651174283755,"score_spread":0.3451335743378477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400876817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468922,0.005993535,0.0069380533,0.02527695,0.00033592718,0.00003265855,0.0036038815,0.00017460097,0.010752234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973157,0.00046926588,0.00074859394,0.00032868676,0.00022380783,0.0000067383703,0.0006169407,0.00001627427,0.00027398585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959151,0.0016187124,0.00029203366,0.00064883893,0.00081544346,0.00070984045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94183403,0.037667267,0.010768623,0.001574698,0.0052023428,0.0029528998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063715773,0.00020976465,0.00070985674,0.004416,0.001039163,0.0031428658,0.0006393745,0.0014752805,0.0049278084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059366997,0.00023387877,0.00067279703,0.008989816,0.0012327883,0.003710063,0.0010573248,0.0018808552,0.00074096833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006148962,0.00011758397,0.8988684,0.00018823243,0.00035028812,0.00045738387,0.0006997406,0.0029986615,0.00029085303,0.008060092,0.015201667,0.072152324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009807898,0.00021946421,0.8375551,0.000326782,0.00065543276,0.0019238879,0.003155478,0.038003556,0.00041874312,0.110438995,0.007128552,0.000075813194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009099589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014213684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010666664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014422478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033696473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400889509","doi":"10.14746/eip.2024.1.7","title":"The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Psychiatric Nurses Association; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7033057739797399,"score_gpt":0.6590939185420052,"score_spread":0.04421185543773476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400889509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04627652,0.11791152,0.09438285,0.584136,0.015389135,0.00547529,0.00063780363,0.00025871972,0.13553219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68549615,0.06974305,0.15471205,0.060669035,0.007597967,0.007987645,0.00040602215,0.0005676703,0.012820451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7398547,0.16593628,0.019521713,0.0053127045,0.064870946,0.0045036143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35361168,0.552835,0.016889311,0.01039396,0.06297228,0.003297824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26471096,0.0009907783,0.0013809017,0.02189127,0.01065886,0.029497053,0.002633339,0.007221122,0.0016032555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34368995,0.0010289703,0.0016454825,0.012625942,0.053371,0.022578098,0.008499497,0.012871161,0.00038026008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013468221,0.00006948613,0.0025641161,0.0040760064,0.000094578216,0.0004161628,0.10437985,0.0007643245,0.00037250982,0.76131976,0.050704896,0.0751036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075137665,0.00016865604,0.005631707,0.021397308,0.00017616204,0.0006681427,0.09056546,0.0017430757,0.0017020771,0.31732628,0.56022567,0.0003203485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008133982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00653959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03382232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055152204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9067423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400913915","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3002715","title":"“Best Paper” awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publication; Openness to experience; Incentive; Best practice; Open science; Public relations; Discipline; Subject (documents); Political science; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7044528693036902,"score_gpt":0.6304489793274004,"score_spread":0.07400388997628982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400913915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5551606,0.006935798,0.04415472,0.12405812,0.0052395933,0.0013449922,0.0021945247,0.0010271547,0.25988448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95808136,0.0020036486,0.017005773,0.008665503,0.0017922808,0.0004917312,0.00073958945,0.00019367195,0.011026359],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80076337,0.0838598,0.026220847,0.005798566,0.07528057,0.008076909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38578114,0.313886,0.13558474,0.05425026,0.080058545,0.03043936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18972646,0.00045074936,0.0012545234,0.008662246,0.005586745,0.022040557,0.0025464103,0.0016195702,0.0101777585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44530076,0.00050334446,0.00091084157,0.015844394,0.0062092845,0.01364449,0.010391986,0.00313004,0.0025605725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040645068,0.00050481054,0.28948355,0.0021673648,0.0003663001,0.00026755573,0.011114685,0.00085874356,0.0014539367,0.11820441,0.07146987,0.5037024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020718301,0.00078065397,0.5038804,0.002219339,0.00021842563,0.00093169115,0.025834728,0.0026677733,0.0023327125,0.14303488,0.31758687,0.0003052837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026601877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060438486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00496809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012129079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401023281","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.24.604934","title":"“I’d like to think I’d be able to spot one if I saw one”: How science journalists navigate predatory journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Journalism; Public relations; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Credibility; Political science; Trustworthiness; Newspaper; Perception; Citizen science; Internet privacy; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3049552395082844,"score_gpt":0.45338592290999924,"score_spread":0.14843068340171484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401023281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92343843,0.0018977735,0.0058807214,0.0395827,0.00035393742,0.000099666344,0.000050223804,0.00005733479,0.028639322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877814,0.0007444472,0.0019570775,0.0069208434,0.00010929675,0.000045886703,0.000024620385,0.00003831704,0.00237812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651703,0.025837818,0.00092846726,0.0015228401,0.0041073826,0.0024330658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9078241,0.058602013,0.016130075,0.002280843,0.0073760115,0.007786936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025686147,0.0003414895,0.00054614816,0.002289518,0.014027652,0.013768092,0.0014013828,0.0033105386,0.0024047797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06357771,0.0005799726,0.000380879,0.0016688687,0.015009664,0.0070521627,0.005986776,0.004928517,0.0007540265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009487314,0.000068858884,0.032716364,0.00026710087,0.000053431428,0.0020583854,0.9331379,0.00007396468,0.0019168128,0.007297036,0.008084079,0.01423123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023364506,0.00008367869,0.010455404,0.00037638986,0.0000299021,0.0013308913,0.92324746,0.00028492586,0.00059564743,0.005364438,0.05812876,0.00007915319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063644596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009218612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99668944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004766976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058999723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13584292},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4401280043","doi":"10.29173/jchla29752","title":"Scopus Search Analyzer","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Bar chart; Computer science; Spectrum analyzer; Information retrieval; Data mining; Data science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0814748000887435,"score_gpt":0.4439825608021105,"score_spread":0.362507760713367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401280043","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029944718,0.0048375097,0.020830926,0.002756807,0.0005202273,0.0046709343,0.7344146,0.06746548,0.13455886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048476905,0.004800706,0.1353497,0.0010224519,0.00040490547,0.0070714722,0.757645,0.01020656,0.035022274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622357,0.0005324749,0.0014120576,0.0004887266,0.0010209872,0.00032216377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742702,0.0076818275,0.0028754114,0.0014570986,0.0123053035,0.0014101858],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056754895,0.0018064531,0.0021462382,0.05368337,0.001886015,0.006454738,0.0016589509,0.0010827287,0.06733736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027788853,0.0010450314,0.0014474032,0.04452492,0.00042463964,0.0038897255,0.0034329807,0.0012509902,0.031871285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080826716,0.0001961781,0.01056089,0.012666676,0.00037527236,0.0009203895,0.0008919363,0.00069423276,0.0037080573,0.014168339,0.81546354,0.1395463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032691116,0.00015134993,0.016251354,0.0018923072,0.0003957433,0.0005821023,0.0007635433,0.0040937755,0.0055237575,0.007426998,0.9623628,0.0002292552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073064426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011206026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019954352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083775055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22526592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401316491","doi":"10.32388/z2x3mo","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Regional science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401316491","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001300705,0.05042556,0.002242434,0.5081249,0.26601827,0.0013175765,0.03685739,0.0013268887,0.13238631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025740502,0.07588058,0.0063205916,0.15365122,0.07260723,0.0010478678,0.03460993,0.0019750604,0.62816703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830693,0.0017560796,0.00076526386,0.000730378,0.012752021,0.00092695316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86412907,0.008498378,0.0026440136,0.0019928487,0.111789495,0.01094619],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013872628,0.0010161574,0.0015765497,0.009281544,0.0059631662,0.010447694,0.0033990492,0.0034420863,0.10066177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08592726,0.0004530749,0.0009727677,0.009075444,0.0034204682,0.0038023242,0.0033632847,0.0030355426,0.038229916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006059233,0.0000020355787,0.00006626498,0.00029112666,0.000003457676,0.000012756737,0.00003769703,0.000020678679,0.000023947916,0.0005122783,0.9899705,0.009053188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008822809,0.000004989472,0.0010013884,0.00079849566,0.0000127894555,0.000015536729,0.00011587674,0.00004886064,0.000046243076,0.00027699655,0.9976549,0.000015092256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6512637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80063117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028130295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19535717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7015801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401316857","doi":"10.1111/caje.12728","title":"Reproduce to validate: A comprehensive study on the reproducibility of economics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Citation; Computer science; Confidentiality; Reproducibility; Code (set theory); Data science; Statistics; Computer security; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8716767194993417,"score_gpt":0.47025232220710994,"score_spread":0.4014243972922317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401316857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889035,0.011543122,0.04690779,0.007453497,0.00063837797,0.002364585,0.004694285,0.0007071465,0.03678775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856089,0.0006676633,0.009931002,0.00065838435,0.00024352952,0.00061317685,0.0012213436,0.00025987346,0.0007960607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.51649725,0.26590496,0.07546452,0.024232728,0.11390714,0.003993385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.027957285,0.74896395,0.08127726,0.103767924,0.036353685,0.001679964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43660814,0.0009584305,0.002179183,0.017419552,0.0044265892,0.012583557,0.003121394,0.002978626,0.005243809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.83311516,0.001019392,0.0041723717,0.024972416,0.009538316,0.013537757,0.010276528,0.002605468,0.0012131834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015559061,0.0005496977,0.79999214,0.0044753896,0.005261525,0.0009577811,0.027110409,0.0026696094,0.0015988378,0.01785075,0.008704743,0.12927322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048311634,0.002038503,0.8503985,0.0058036307,0.0036611333,0.002566755,0.015287169,0.01111369,0.00829551,0.040548123,0.059159685,0.00064419163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020801122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018960246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56339186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005049296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00868567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69476247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401413316","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110770","title":"Single-author publications among neurosurgeons in the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Laidlaw Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Ranking (information retrieval); Affect (linguistics); Family medicine; Kingdom; Gerontology; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.8986094510027264,"score_gpt":0.6824477955243516,"score_spread":0.21616165547837474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401413316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459529,0.031672034,0.00008217654,0.0015474672,0.0001471511,0.000015192698,0.015946979,0.00002599101,0.0046101375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98403394,0.011713288,0.0000866433,0.00013582359,0.00008220263,0.0000126981495,0.0025599147,0.000007642492,0.0013678232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954045,0.000563493,0.001678363,0.0006310807,0.0013174665,0.0004051331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612827,0.014427559,0.015288752,0.00064871815,0.0061092754,0.0022431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00152882,0.00026144893,0.0011209681,0.019824203,0.0005860505,0.0033249883,0.0005992842,0.0009452997,0.0060794232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022680767,0.00028935887,0.00064046285,0.034471937,0.0005766216,0.0016221668,0.0015810595,0.00037154905,0.0010285714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026249388,0.00002766834,0.96901,0.0018391075,0.00037321853,0.0018338436,0.0019525612,0.00021741593,0.00046299418,0.00033513867,0.0042469804,0.01943855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001317102,0.000038396167,0.99414647,0.0003651339,0.00007383585,0.00093218643,0.0016419912,0.00012908666,0.00008715918,0.000075853786,0.0024821952,0.0000144167825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06477668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08914331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034966199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032631832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12879932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809847","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v4i1.42365","title":"Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.660765226777372,"score_gpt":0.5312364057208319,"score_spread":0.12952882105654018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004429042,0.08815129,0.0011385552,0.8022852,0.020046044,0.00028073037,0.0030426166,0.0006180791,0.08000838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19814101,0.15671718,0.010174401,0.47256136,0.020318534,0.00067880197,0.008183989,0.00094853435,0.13227613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.918976,0.01331331,0.0059514437,0.0044549266,0.045914747,0.011389465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56994367,0.030141024,0.019874232,0.016353087,0.2983639,0.06532409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051899888,0.0011391237,0.0033796222,0.017990611,0.012041089,0.03542825,0.0040538874,0.009398057,0.025803564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19336925,0.0009915195,0.0014688392,0.030816441,0.00801941,0.01496041,0.0059588314,0.0070449878,0.007260269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107853884,0.00005576725,0.005774787,0.0020297563,0.00015608633,0.00022330333,0.00097150233,0.00022238292,0.00029109948,0.024700174,0.8555454,0.109921865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059606045,0.000026055355,0.010636913,0.0023547653,0.00008215858,0.00007395658,0.0012242456,0.00015464924,0.00017674455,0.0036601073,0.98146963,0.000081173064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9158646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95132846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12667266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12667266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4342833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91907877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401981553","doi":"10.6087/kcse.345","title":"Our journey as intern junior editors at the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance&lt;/i&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Experimental psychology; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.3165060921893268,"score_gpt":0.5587387415186065,"score_spread":0.24223264932927968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401981553","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017174693,0.03443379,0.010634881,0.36540923,0.5015222,0.0003451949,0.0022124215,0.0033261226,0.0649416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057525195,0.024961637,0.020705625,0.05479954,0.15294343,0.00043882197,0.0025662817,0.004247309,0.68181205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434197,0.00086187513,0.00037190382,0.00093587564,0.0026628613,0.0008253818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9080083,0.0028377988,0.00375537,0.0030648855,0.016965315,0.065368354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016478373,0.0013129758,0.0013567267,0.003932849,0.0035720717,0.01176743,0.0014392957,0.0026523871,0.08597368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023744138,0.0010156909,0.00085616857,0.0022999167,0.0021448233,0.0079973,0.006268925,0.0071864966,0.08842741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005678377,0.00008633531,0.0013175196,0.00017155391,0.000012079648,0.0001559395,0.0005018259,0.000028386457,0.00076116284,0.001260027,0.93480736,0.060841046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014874371,0.00008885439,0.0037881911,0.00015169602,0.000016166685,0.00037289556,0.0011845208,0.00009288409,0.00037809403,0.0019580198,0.9919234,0.000030494944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010367556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040259394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98352164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008948363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402111073","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_10","title":"Conclusion: Inconclusive Thoughts on an Uncertain Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5030762794251062,"score_gpt":0.591099542357933,"score_spread":0.0880232629328268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402111073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022214667,0.014891404,0.0047917212,0.92706186,0.017661614,0.000039234947,0.000557619,0.00012292292,0.032652255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21225226,0.02373022,0.011860012,0.6855722,0.038096014,0.0003528447,0.00090411754,0.00026147702,0.026970852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937691,0.0025976452,0.00037608133,0.0010524292,0.0018619854,0.00034273078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93724555,0.044191264,0.0034294997,0.0026036543,0.010809873,0.0017202287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135498755,0.00093951053,0.0009400294,0.00402545,0.003289346,0.00842831,0.0049078595,0.011300151,0.029477613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083643354,0.0003375972,0.0007575456,0.003976332,0.013846878,0.017892316,0.004192211,0.011676221,0.008220957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010889126,0.000032847853,0.00081058335,0.001021764,0.000074834876,0.0005986964,0.0034739228,0.00031145388,0.00019028646,0.44141787,0.5129699,0.03898907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043567998,0.000016331724,0.00072157104,0.0021435148,0.000070075694,0.00047373667,0.00991867,0.0004140012,0.00032838274,0.6424955,0.34332958,0.000045085377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031576545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028068135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029477613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048512737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09861249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402115014","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2024.100079","title":"Impact factor does not predict long-term article impact across 15 journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data and Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Longevity; Publication; Citation; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Library science; Demography; Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.47729475853568815,"score_gpt":0.6017254156890397,"score_spread":0.12443065715335155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402115014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798299,0.0038754956,0.0014906689,0.0008164138,0.00014002952,0.000047246507,0.004793416,0.00015338074,0.008853435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597436,0.00044405618,0.0006479123,0.00006509011,0.000102448495,0.000021328544,0.002053255,0.000023242726,0.0006682148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243426,0.0010414192,0.0021250767,0.0009036521,0.002895528,0.00060005084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8657213,0.05915747,0.04535771,0.0057424116,0.015058705,0.00896238],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010138946,0.00047440117,0.0010079526,0.018233532,0.00084002677,0.0033981185,0.00080704316,0.0010272092,0.00491807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06749019,0.0002602353,0.0014586707,0.02596118,0.00087073154,0.0046947054,0.0018970201,0.0009184395,0.0019150012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013412471,0.00006119321,0.98372126,0.00021784133,0.00046956292,0.00006797382,0.00019417345,0.00041032024,0.0004470583,0.00030284186,0.00083346956,0.013140295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013557982,0.00014804731,0.9951815,0.000050921364,0.00010339232,0.00018101119,0.00025860989,0.000820068,0.0002493867,0.0008565065,0.0021171102,0.000019802144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041715894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059758616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011625937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001452616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053620517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402135165","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-02849-w","title":"How can I publish open access when I can’t afford the fees?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Publication; Computer science; Business; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Computer security; Economics; Advertising; Operating system","score_opus":0.5754697724394935,"score_gpt":0.6136046166867667,"score_spread":0.0381348442472732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402135165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004325785,0.011606215,0.005183875,0.90245634,0.013982061,0.000029989735,0.0005000316,0.0002662335,0.061649475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38867927,0.06651173,0.019373994,0.3405871,0.07249383,0.0003607173,0.0017599189,0.001442226,0.10879124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604165,0.015539289,0.0022699432,0.0020221493,0.016870474,0.0028816832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7104827,0.16599275,0.025425168,0.019645868,0.044240292,0.034213223],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04108358,0.00048173833,0.0016064988,0.0058815707,0.00450205,0.032415282,0.0021438878,0.011556128,0.029972333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3142369,0.000558021,0.0008997049,0.011481849,0.01064256,0.04089002,0.005433513,0.010116134,0.012806647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020195209,0.00012476985,0.0072349664,0.0008808741,0.00021463828,0.0003198351,0.0016063105,0.00031884896,0.00071007863,0.19191055,0.578793,0.21768416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006154945,0.000046469268,0.0043807044,0.0012110696,0.00008988693,0.0003933787,0.0032866627,0.00054087024,0.0007505906,0.3027363,0.68634975,0.0001526761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005650106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007965924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99785614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042726444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014103838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21727335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402451286","doi":"10.1109/jsyst.2024.3454938","title":"Editorial","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"IEEE Systems Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3422342235550952,"score_gpt":0.5552229495675075,"score_spread":0.2129887260124123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402451286","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047391797,0.0008216099,0.00008559559,0.016355077,0.97972953,0.000023126806,0.00004390442,0.00007929823,0.0028143509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008162525,0.0014542277,0.00012751955,0.014433313,0.9562579,0.000027809952,0.00006574564,0.00006577304,0.026751507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607605,0.0004201077,0.00048061615,0.0005486213,0.0021589017,0.00031563643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732092,0.0039268997,0.0010627467,0.0010005418,0.016145324,0.004655306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503392,0.0030651458,0.0020552687,0.0025733672,0.0025616663,0.006055478,0.0022155927,0.008650914,0.040192813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025365356,0.0007604438,0.0016832654,0.0008644105,0.0014634507,0.0032719248,0.0010474016,0.010739235,0.040770292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002831816,0.000010964587,0.0000271604,0.00008008224,0.0000052062046,0.00013152618,0.0000049000396,0.000014040166,0.000052531184,0.00020089519,0.99454236,0.0049020657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039033966,0.000024753124,0.0002123476,0.00017471168,0.000014955765,0.0003537593,0.000030510344,0.0001103946,0.00016895811,0.0007548333,0.99810493,0.000010804581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007022497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015782184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95980716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022303064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022813862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402453161","doi":"10.29173/cais1841","title":"The Use of Institutional Repositories for Self-Archiving in Canadian Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.2466887847518986,"score_gpt":0.4171787706029342,"score_spread":0.17048998585103559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402453161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88787687,0.010398784,0.0036379187,0.01117882,0.00016944624,0.00045749763,0.0021315422,0.00054053427,0.08360857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837196,0.0036303208,0.0034343859,0.0005476275,0.000047679292,0.000065356144,0.00069300225,0.000083112536,0.007778931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9556735,0.01108415,0.00402234,0.002517949,0.021523235,0.0051788627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7853884,0.050242133,0.04554146,0.024914782,0.07998668,0.013926571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029284457,0.00041047097,0.0005740391,0.019433014,0.010632258,0.01609027,0.0039005098,0.0011556019,0.0045207837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12488569,0.0005274297,0.00063991034,0.02408979,0.0048361956,0.006421549,0.005799537,0.0011748989,0.00057862117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027885396,0.00036915386,0.46057495,0.0010230336,0.00016697253,0.0007027983,0.062020395,0.0009867351,0.0022734136,0.027337303,0.018822478,0.42544407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003574186,0.00015246987,0.7239202,0.0013698047,0.00024155375,0.0010546802,0.06698816,0.0024081576,0.004284894,0.0023679528,0.19677754,0.0003987981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8587946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89312226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06105175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115432255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44296354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402453776","doi":"10.29173/cais1845","title":"The Value of a Diamond: Understanding Global Coverage of Diamond Open Access Journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex to Support an Open Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Diamond; World Wide Web; Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Political science; MEDLINE; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.38672522013639615,"score_gpt":0.532216438191279,"score_spread":0.1454912180548828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402453776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80209637,0.012478805,0.008471058,0.01808243,0.0001571183,0.00008076042,0.0073114173,0.00019080994,0.15113129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893188,0.0026795277,0.0038837956,0.0005655547,0.00012692712,0.000040424056,0.0021527386,0.000095786956,0.0011364683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898846,0.0027000376,0.0009169247,0.00115805,0.0043771346,0.0009632887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8735307,0.07657434,0.02092263,0.0064577553,0.018366702,0.004147881],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013328465,0.00031346877,0.00089961704,0.0333279,0.0012951542,0.012585548,0.0010844851,0.0008344417,0.00427581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08088084,0.00023689281,0.00042052672,0.05196329,0.003606998,0.016141344,0.0077256397,0.0011598405,0.0008407483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025781634,0.00007907126,0.6076775,0.0014721012,0.0003025999,0.0005109133,0.03593951,0.0009271092,0.0016957497,0.092911705,0.012246507,0.24597944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038917624,0.00018921164,0.6814174,0.002574906,0.0002624597,0.0012732439,0.08940158,0.0038417168,0.001442883,0.089287065,0.13014783,0.0001228322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006630728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009332223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018240979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019138823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07048851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402565036","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103882","title":"Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gray (unit); Science policy; Management science; Political science; Regional science; Environmental science; Sociology; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.4141796441951298,"score_gpt":0.6053734205310228,"score_spread":0.19119377633589302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402565036","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075672762,0.4984437,0.019757964,0.42928842,0.011418518,0.0005748472,0.0003801275,0.00027678665,0.032292347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33021295,0.3405414,0.06859733,0.22391237,0.020045998,0.004356462,0.0007971298,0.0013087098,0.010227704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6477025,0.2293402,0.044208195,0.015742749,0.055654977,0.0073512928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17674991,0.6752609,0.032269515,0.035027962,0.07409738,0.0065943096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30695054,0.0013326337,0.0040458464,0.0426481,0.0066984547,0.03464562,0.0054376526,0.012823942,0.0046253474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5587281,0.0015849393,0.0034278804,0.032936845,0.025487013,0.04310263,0.018532587,0.0109390095,0.0012245418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024047177,0.0000995697,0.0031860343,0.03902536,0.0006651709,0.0019170673,0.068515815,0.00096975436,0.0008545563,0.43033195,0.13141201,0.32278225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005466742,0.00007511146,0.0016352624,0.066545516,0.00025674462,0.0007441894,0.022758054,0.00047796158,0.00051895453,0.15515234,0.7516321,0.00014914182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006160885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01086732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69304943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024056574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06283692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85465336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402586478","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00331","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Diamond; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.9189744428884732,"score_gpt":0.7656385779657428,"score_spread":0.15333586492273044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402586478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04365629,0.018292302,0.25778192,0.63187987,0.0145392,0.0014140644,0.0012060292,0.0004095879,0.03082076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58832175,0.008909515,0.32435575,0.061262593,0.008526486,0.0027731257,0.0007493128,0.00047856104,0.0046229493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6735275,0.236612,0.03528003,0.01197632,0.039266486,0.0033376731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24019599,0.5948009,0.04690866,0.037817314,0.07489516,0.005382027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33761784,0.0012801735,0.0040634884,0.024883995,0.0077761123,0.04179133,0.0066552893,0.0052747373,0.005411056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65467495,0.0009664283,0.001796422,0.026380317,0.033088908,0.04509382,0.012373081,0.015375792,0.0019949907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109905326,0.00012569167,0.02488891,0.002112089,0.0003078097,0.00017016448,0.021474093,0.0012230468,0.0006927053,0.8429436,0.027934432,0.07801757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008886903,0.00009556712,0.011848305,0.004922263,0.00011322779,0.0002415259,0.0262484,0.004505936,0.0011550954,0.8652681,0.085241914,0.000270683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013032948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011265054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015442203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81683517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402606259","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2403731","title":"Forty-five years of disability and rehabilitation research: review of the journal Disability and Rehabilitation through bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Psychology; Bibliometrics; Gerontology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.4809516480874636,"score_gpt":0.5957036027198622,"score_spread":0.11475195463239862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402606259","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016324122,0.9959785,0.0001685287,0.00097173714,0.00029748317,0.000027598508,0.00010057628,0.000010623646,0.00081261666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014028734,0.9845197,0.0005157527,0.00026820475,0.00024181734,0.000047491892,0.00017571457,0.000005102691,0.00019742653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98641557,0.0036176604,0.0038651598,0.000786957,0.004986968,0.00032761414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555124,0.027222333,0.007285109,0.00085432397,0.008374772,0.0007510276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124702705,0.0008441455,0.0030393214,0.05096894,0.0010486501,0.0040079113,0.0010715665,0.0012255796,0.0023706576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03884604,0.00062489806,0.0022166523,0.05786594,0.0013064021,0.003629354,0.0014610862,0.00091367215,0.0005011831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010299808,0.00007265262,0.010789677,0.14766486,0.0026546312,0.00023956885,0.0010354236,0.00038757228,0.00045272242,0.0024796796,0.017546596,0.81657356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052680538,0.0002864672,0.12086477,0.25064468,0.009048659,0.0020040418,0.0029301585,0.0006604662,0.00095808785,0.0034652238,0.6089432,0.00014149483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058896784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014626182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98752975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004226455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017511854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06594992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402878363","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620","title":"Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tzu Chi College of Technology; Tzu Chi University","keywords":"Web of science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.3699171100309078,"score_gpt":0.5316296822327008,"score_spread":0.16171257220179297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402878363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86241275,0.06014929,0.002080594,0.0032196052,0.00054781017,0.00040152695,0.05379077,0.00037616005,0.017021421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94226515,0.022737624,0.003038594,0.00028271062,0.0005393181,0.00037317234,0.027961876,0.00007629195,0.0027252357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746439,0.0030611253,0.007018964,0.0012873146,0.013058889,0.0009298523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9318548,0.021172749,0.023973297,0.0025927061,0.01872447,0.0016819693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012289268,0.00055739883,0.0014023868,0.1133834,0.0012577843,0.0056848424,0.000988839,0.00097586407,0.001988938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06808379,0.00023927588,0.0017524852,0.16402148,0.0008199418,0.003589183,0.0024969904,0.00077547046,0.0012418453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004507681,0.00014782239,0.7550318,0.0051322985,0.0011596744,0.0013504323,0.0047872784,0.0013731527,0.001237324,0.0014648073,0.015629137,0.21223556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018770945,0.000112610425,0.9432602,0.001060519,0.0004998395,0.0017338985,0.0046240753,0.0018002185,0.0011737482,0.00073865283,0.04491539,0.00006207254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008985343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009639983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99902415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033547923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004543413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064992666},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4402984919","doi":"10.30654/mjcr.10149","title":"A Case Report for Quality Assurance: Understanding the NSQIP Database and Preventing Error in Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathews Journal of Case Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Medicine; Database; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7771070929117748,"score_gpt":0.6368671075224521,"score_spread":0.1402399853893227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402984919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17515583,0.013897887,0.16952379,0.5707652,0.014735353,0.0044867573,0.0006908553,0.002810137,0.0479342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006212,0.006616469,0.12779789,0.047906023,0.008446266,0.0019344492,0.0006767092,0.0006853557,0.0053154915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.7737313,0.108176686,0.038876727,0.008296277,0.06635035,0.0045687812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44333568,0.25727543,0.14191309,0.042302515,0.098171815,0.017001392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.088371694,0.0007602119,0.0007193266,0.0072256695,0.0069197584,0.008328907,0.003940253,0.0041754753,0.0035854196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4466512,0.0008022884,0.00096958794,0.005869488,0.004632208,0.010519518,0.005744105,0.006969912,0.0013917536],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025021576,0.000531603,0.25923547,0.0021189484,0.00017627634,0.0781386,0.031788282,0.0016400471,0.0018494279,0.031834003,0.3092254,0.2832118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018011991,0.00043628283,0.08602702,0.012657962,0.00024714277,0.22997269,0.044035953,0.015636217,0.005321817,0.05598538,0.54893684,0.00056262896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075396835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007791336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9116283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008272228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02117461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46735978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403010732","doi":"10.7202/1113756ar","title":"Les revues canadiennes en sciences sociales et humaines : entre diffusion nationale et internationalisation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Political science; Humanities; Art; Business","score_opus":0.7457423671960298,"score_gpt":0.614565238017552,"score_spread":0.1311771291784778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403010732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07407091,0.31097275,0.014214273,0.075271495,0.0038633498,0.00035713927,0.0013224303,0.00040105762,0.51952666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.626128,0.25752464,0.015891029,0.008822744,0.002125597,0.0009165186,0.0012949301,0.0006934984,0.08660305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484067,0.022911446,0.004550587,0.0047976463,0.0168848,0.002448827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7900408,0.12850055,0.012800197,0.014697186,0.04689227,0.0070690047],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05543248,0.001003917,0.001831613,0.026607808,0.007846198,0.030280547,0.0019495887,0.0037626403,0.016950252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08139479,0.0008698004,0.0012863838,0.040064577,0.016454533,0.019004207,0.011682131,0.0055234497,0.0041654785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016946641,0.00012271793,0.01835512,0.00671975,0.00029455396,0.00059208286,0.14477386,0.000582038,0.001627271,0.5109,0.021932315,0.29393086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020636691,0.00010202414,0.02542216,0.0077280914,0.0001244382,0.0005016084,0.061098326,0.00028040097,0.0015516086,0.044565607,0.85849565,0.00010951919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034066193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03688308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97987753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020122493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041906912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29315847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403013382","doi":"10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.09.009","title":"Orthopedic research productivity of KSA: First bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Productivity; Orthopedic surgery; Medicine; Surgery; Economics","score_opus":0.7085184768933618,"score_gpt":0.6118808293536963,"score_spread":0.09663764753966553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403013382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6701803,0.12299924,0.0057749026,0.0034718923,0.00047868403,0.0020702532,0.15708399,0.0010564758,0.036884274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90368384,0.038002048,0.007400777,0.00017700456,0.0004562612,0.0014275488,0.046435755,0.00011657779,0.002300147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856426,0.0018413707,0.004114509,0.0013158974,0.0062877233,0.0007978399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410145,0.027095605,0.013453557,0.0023102604,0.014664071,0.0014619826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011238767,0.0013069187,0.0036475547,0.15538225,0.0016315565,0.0074552107,0.0013809162,0.0007938456,0.006711955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06164085,0.00052093173,0.0041509187,0.14788224,0.0007542572,0.003939132,0.003079488,0.00062726066,0.002103214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006608807,0.000205464,0.70063466,0.037284814,0.00549149,0.0011390183,0.0032227023,0.0019975854,0.0010195761,0.0024677205,0.01637106,0.229505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008133443,0.00042974157,0.92128503,0.0067885695,0.0057456093,0.0023099896,0.0056425612,0.0043382356,0.0014302346,0.002275539,0.04948544,0.0001877608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081906635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98876125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042275027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007936304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059436977},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4403035225","doi":"10.1515/9780776638775-005","title":"ADDENDUM. About the Centre on Governance of the University of Ottawa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Addendum; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Geography; Management; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.22969127437313724,"score_gpt":0.3605927596755298,"score_spread":0.13090148530239254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403035225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007648023,0.013324664,0.00021551439,0.03824668,0.031933922,0.000128873,0.012957187,0.0009872592,0.9014411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011816599,0.0017027941,0.00008044265,0.0014445597,0.000611656,0.00002234858,0.00079107523,0.00015448163,0.994011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988722,0.000072017174,0.00006278754,0.00013448126,0.0005672092,0.00029137818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965838,0.00040973516,0.00015603089,0.00030400185,0.0013305312,0.0012158416],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005994456,0.00121909,0.0010546373,0.0025432634,0.0046371645,0.010054509,0.001668837,0.0035884327,0.6495719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031791076,0.001036815,0.00061540265,0.0044637625,0.0015658947,0.0036626123,0.003220921,0.00255356,0.3852731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015451453,0.0000064657042,0.00008713613,0.00012682502,0.0000015093309,0.000026934475,0.000094984745,0.000020970068,0.000053735774,0.0017566088,0.9823252,0.015484253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021740464,0.0000017835017,0.0002619606,0.00004139032,0.0000018131884,0.000010229924,0.0000826767,0.0000067612896,0.000021188991,0.00015401222,0.9994118,0.000004149709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3842096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7632151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6495719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017647827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015999924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76394653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403120212","doi":"10.25080/nkvc9349","title":"Continuous Tools for Scientific Publishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Innovates; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Publishing; Scientific publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.5985646921998998,"score_gpt":0.5403248105297374,"score_spread":0.058239881670162474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403120212","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008975665,0.0032246318,0.7869526,0.02596989,0.006687166,0.0014204842,0.0016420576,0.043730397,0.12139708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118074454,0.0038714006,0.79002005,0.0026367155,0.0066759023,0.0032470438,0.0031108246,0.011853182,0.060510475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88473696,0.045904305,0.0129323015,0.008896731,0.045128204,0.002401493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4983371,0.18960005,0.023780763,0.21057692,0.06535658,0.012348619],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08885011,0.0017795423,0.0013372061,0.015834218,0.00774269,0.04296493,0.00832602,0.0066886963,0.042453036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29412583,0.0020781087,0.00223595,0.016239982,0.012711937,0.049644873,0.032991905,0.009711558,0.032848332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000190593,0.00021045882,0.0024730081,0.0011119298,0.000074706164,0.00042387014,0.012636689,0.001743968,0.0029494592,0.3299985,0.10780952,0.5403773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000884755,0.000103346945,0.00093669095,0.00057562225,0.00003337249,0.00060656486,0.0017513782,0.0022029008,0.0027180347,0.17669562,0.81415486,0.00013313412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094389886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083669956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046406146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012988102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46988994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403187083","doi":"10.7759/cureus.71001","title":"A Century of Mathematical Epidemiology: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cureus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Visualization; Epidemiology; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Data mining; Pathology","score_opus":0.8547371498408696,"score_gpt":0.7288303240598216,"score_spread":0.12590682578104795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403187083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039364472,0.6414403,0.13350736,0.09554237,0.005933653,0.0007940245,0.011667443,0.0016496248,0.070100844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3244935,0.50104797,0.14566071,0.0059061744,0.007010814,0.0015855276,0.0061401525,0.00048776015,0.007667422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742056,0.011756406,0.0028235456,0.0013843888,0.009346536,0.00048352114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566727,0.026848854,0.0052573984,0.0038074567,0.0065300902,0.0008834461],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022797436,0.0010751119,0.0023757073,0.07712333,0.0015937863,0.014428419,0.0011176495,0.001615442,0.0037562703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07697643,0.0005653627,0.002062614,0.11276094,0.0034511907,0.015128285,0.004989357,0.0022583876,0.000956053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249353,0.00005307057,0.014810702,0.016747868,0.0017880365,0.00026827393,0.0050700596,0.0024417827,0.0010933672,0.1797384,0.07365107,0.70421237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004874653,0.00014493427,0.041499924,0.014264432,0.000808545,0.0010935519,0.008317757,0.006871072,0.0012038625,0.2649737,0.6605125,0.00026094762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00402811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005318566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97720253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046515367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008163786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12056583},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4403197130","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.005","title":"Why Early Career Researchers Should Engage in the Peer Review Process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Psychology; Peer review; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6364947067037929,"score_gpt":0.6325054537421799,"score_spread":0.00398925296161301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403197130","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000111403344,0.0025270577,0.00033383843,0.10102313,0.8948388,0.000051765586,0.000028599834,0.00009027544,0.0009951654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014663332,0.00228444,0.0005979579,0.03513655,0.9549005,0.0000852656,0.00002738879,0.00007928066,0.0054222546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9344053,0.016324827,0.01007556,0.0040789796,0.032119796,0.002995492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.504309,0.19618385,0.01652944,0.0120759215,0.23418245,0.036719397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07983861,0.0027888427,0.0045730285,0.005527278,0.0063047376,0.022183545,0.005662088,0.03361563,0.0105378935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2993401,0.0018473399,0.002538747,0.0029157917,0.0070626214,0.007647484,0.0025287503,0.030007219,0.008700089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053736654,0.000032003183,0.00011169419,0.0004325338,0.00003931368,0.00009543111,0.0000524949,0.000023923054,0.000090181056,0.0006807044,0.9883459,0.010042011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031375556,0.000080794394,0.0021887433,0.0013115569,0.00017788733,0.000324165,0.0003653521,0.00062716886,0.00039501875,0.0069774445,0.98713464,0.00010336559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022321395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008187647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92016137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056303614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013031979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42223197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403258249","doi":"10.1177/21582440241286217","title":"Research Output, Key Topics, and Trends in Productivity, Visibility, and Collaboration in Social Sciences Research on COVID-19: A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Visibility; Productivity; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Visualization; Data science; Key (lock); Regional science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth; Biology; Medicine; Virology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.791546586054148,"score_gpt":0.7291634070649856,"score_spread":0.06238317898916235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403258249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6140611,0.027927605,0.03416265,0.00891144,0.0010748464,0.0062546204,0.24371405,0.0036773963,0.06021632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8036361,0.014968993,0.08591534,0.0003600688,0.0005565294,0.011951894,0.07846476,0.0006910002,0.0034553935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9452134,0.017142495,0.013555497,0.002877368,0.018970761,0.0022405158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7472991,0.19026801,0.01991482,0.008492941,0.030865768,0.0031592743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047147278,0.0014308493,0.004162774,0.17468819,0.0027240939,0.01123542,0.0013941746,0.0011705953,0.0063884053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20714325,0.0007113283,0.0040037297,0.27131152,0.0021832264,0.006087828,0.009299271,0.0014657562,0.0008353346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000796795,0.000278032,0.45956847,0.047287814,0.0046736524,0.0010608883,0.03160765,0.0066382773,0.0039400584,0.039474066,0.07095633,0.3337179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002975274,0.0004257821,0.63588005,0.009567316,0.00284696,0.0011128088,0.03153953,0.016342402,0.0029239084,0.03229862,0.26627085,0.0004942639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008131867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075659575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005076197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011169017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2493416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403559446","doi":"10.1016/j.micron.2024.103727","title":"Bring your paper into the ‘Fast Lane’ of the editorial process and increase your changes for final acceptance in Micron, The International Research and Review Journal for Microscopy – Part II","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Micron","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Process (computing); Nanotechnology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.6426817538981707,"score_gpt":0.6425610705351855,"score_spread":0.00012068336298520776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403559446","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014284942,0.019828582,0.009881806,0.17209384,0.78294784,0.0007967018,0.0005934197,0.0025015804,0.009927718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015593479,0.04944725,0.062012024,0.109371774,0.68169177,0.0025590563,0.0013839932,0.0062853824,0.07165529],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9354295,0.018474562,0.011607052,0.0031484885,0.02931476,0.0020256478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41703802,0.088594675,0.03884707,0.023313554,0.40327308,0.028933648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06346802,0.0015966112,0.0031335813,0.0098633,0.0047569964,0.026549991,0.0026992552,0.008019672,0.07156721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42850924,0.0014923193,0.003281534,0.005282779,0.003210018,0.01165495,0.004281226,0.014685567,0.08493432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010001453,0.000057711055,0.00037997545,0.0011761502,0.000093844086,0.00018666418,0.00027943475,0.00005059767,0.0009014645,0.0013530332,0.9332993,0.062121756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000747761,0.000100463454,0.0009732179,0.0010482149,0.000099685734,0.00045492031,0.00027181717,0.00020531498,0.00075735035,0.0039957752,0.99193,0.00008850747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093425246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002496342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93653196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027427203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019994225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33565503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403560549","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2024.2412269","title":"Accessible scientific conferences for blind and low vision professionals and researchers: a necessary step for achieving STEMM equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CNIB Foundation; Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Psychology; Low vision; Public relations; Political science; Optometry; Medicine","score_opus":0.7045875343204858,"score_gpt":0.6564878198879283,"score_spread":0.04809971443255756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403560549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049228806,0.022133972,0.016459957,0.83802044,0.00671528,0.0014694135,0.00096128584,0.0007424268,0.06426835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6873943,0.019223347,0.08930235,0.15762125,0.013020064,0.004848406,0.0017545852,0.0004990965,0.026336657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95604366,0.024727523,0.0023203008,0.0017719644,0.009381753,0.005754866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6985881,0.10921421,0.02072962,0.015492008,0.02894271,0.12703343],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06589626,0.0007464667,0.0014689064,0.0062802234,0.009276748,0.025107125,0.0029804094,0.0077047152,0.03880873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17067154,0.00082306296,0.0011556327,0.0041432306,0.004156096,0.026464768,0.027677502,0.01012957,0.007818618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048676206,0.0017403505,0.025082886,0.0050732703,0.0002884267,0.00078375585,0.016989285,0.00045653645,0.0021371462,0.09196143,0.20118304,0.6538171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048489307,0.0007319688,0.059269883,0.011715052,0.00017746082,0.000817615,0.039241288,0.00055301056,0.0011362807,0.18565065,0.7000126,0.00020934397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029391607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060025514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057759653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048729517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3484969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404058795","doi":"10.38126/jspg250107","title":"Policy Considerations for Canada’s Open Access Publishing Strategy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6892903297914962,"score_gpt":0.6472148725152396,"score_spread":0.04207545727625661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404058795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004236458,0.004032759,0.0025021136,0.8995244,0.002708982,0.00026402556,0.0009527586,0.00027074906,0.085507825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15997396,0.0068022013,0.02712216,0.6945724,0.0030705677,0.00074379944,0.0015201056,0.00043953987,0.105755255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88828987,0.016186725,0.005146059,0.0062157386,0.06484194,0.019319693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70877975,0.08823259,0.0076397783,0.008722904,0.1334461,0.053178933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05981636,0.0010555062,0.0014219439,0.007612304,0.02350526,0.04166386,0.008300437,0.033141308,0.01866527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.190687,0.0012429601,0.002627211,0.009434088,0.01317182,0.017684635,0.00825225,0.02046323,0.0032552164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008483758,0.000087061315,0.0022722764,0.00033593582,0.00006440023,0.00037955376,0.0022588826,0.0008352241,0.0004500234,0.44284055,0.52327275,0.027118474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011266993,0.000055980505,0.0050053564,0.0011161858,0.000072680545,0.0001890164,0.002981868,0.0016397076,0.00046499204,0.058367707,0.929728,0.0002658767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96244633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15546264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5501458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9795436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404094290","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5010875","title":"Analyst-Peer Alumni Tie","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.40147556133462664,"score_gpt":0.5669979265405267,"score_spread":0.16552236520590008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404094290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07358313,0.0015490551,0.017806431,0.025234355,0.0048500835,0.0004853831,0.0006644709,0.0010872507,0.8747398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5048098,0.0011820403,0.0042469813,0.0031462857,0.0050611775,0.00024855827,0.00037835352,0.0003185871,0.48060822],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916053,0.001990769,0.0003888818,0.0011874809,0.003688621,0.0011389367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97006613,0.010052001,0.0025339082,0.002574694,0.008481902,0.0062914044],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006057625,0.00060616294,0.0010185102,0.005201967,0.0056516198,0.009461251,0.0013863603,0.0035310276,0.18286693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053476997,0.00047532885,0.0004267396,0.0026248742,0.0006829948,0.004577239,0.004819138,0.00327674,0.057763968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070699636,0.0010305382,0.027790353,0.0005823197,0.00019173484,0.0018844565,0.0030154407,0.0010629296,0.0036920274,0.2496961,0.33508053,0.3752666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030778162,0.00064356485,0.022256268,0.00020706138,0.00016517082,0.0016604381,0.0053080535,0.008691068,0.0063427924,0.16059387,0.7937381,0.000085819775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010180669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021858395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015744015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045801452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61175084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404182729","doi":"10.32920/27637548","title":"Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9441010751848984,"score_gpt":0.7807323306056492,"score_spread":0.16336874457924921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404182729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3003644,0.22284915,0.1662404,0.11842428,0.016332705,0.01994925,0.05176533,0.0027335968,0.101340905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72903645,0.06502636,0.15945934,0.0093641905,0.0022124047,0.015243351,0.010196418,0.0011721207,0.00828949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.39586517,0.21921542,0.1477809,0.020355005,0.21135399,0.005429464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06959566,0.45861,0.100191735,0.036401007,0.33026052,0.0049409475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43142346,0.001429045,0.0022612184,0.08364067,0.010779451,0.023425693,0.0059811124,0.0023709273,0.003980171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.80089945,0.0016191277,0.0019518203,0.113065414,0.009130843,0.0062412946,0.0073581976,0.0024712568,0.0008341523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067117874,0.0001607091,0.14785247,0.07917974,0.0021080538,0.0010678121,0.10579465,0.0014841286,0.0075282953,0.02996741,0.06880774,0.5553779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035721928,0.00056636764,0.3484269,0.061691888,0.0024922579,0.0017292696,0.068703175,0.0046082926,0.014411435,0.025960106,0.46930504,0.0017480608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30869308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36215296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040366445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11477893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70115614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404182756","doi":"10.32920/27637548.v1","title":"Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Applied psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9441010751848984,"score_gpt":0.7807323306056492,"score_spread":0.16336874457924921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404182756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3003644,0.22284915,0.1662404,0.11842428,0.016332705,0.01994925,0.05176533,0.0027335968,0.101340905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72903645,0.06502636,0.15945934,0.0093641905,0.0022124047,0.015243351,0.010196418,0.0011721207,0.00828949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.39586517,0.21921542,0.1477809,0.020355005,0.21135399,0.005429464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06959566,0.45861,0.100191735,0.036401007,0.33026052,0.0049409475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43142346,0.001429045,0.0022612184,0.08364067,0.010779451,0.023425693,0.0059811124,0.0023709273,0.003980171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.80089945,0.0016191277,0.0019518203,0.113065414,0.009130843,0.0062412946,0.0073581976,0.0024712568,0.0008341523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067117874,0.0001607091,0.14785247,0.07917974,0.0021080538,0.0010678121,0.10579465,0.0014841286,0.0075282953,0.02996741,0.06880774,0.5553779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035721928,0.00056636764,0.3484269,0.061691888,0.0024922579,0.0017292696,0.068703175,0.0046082926,0.014411435,0.025960106,0.46930504,0.0017480608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30869308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36215296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040366445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11477893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70115614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404567963","doi":"10.1177/08902070241301629","title":"Examining personality psychology to unpack the peer review system: Towards a more diverse, inclusive, and equitable psychological science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Personality","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychological science; Personality; Social psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.6844091618747419,"score_gpt":0.61849815946169,"score_spread":0.06591100241305192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404567963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54087895,0.019705707,0.11150181,0.25262094,0.0027056057,0.0007282653,0.0001359886,0.00022654858,0.07149614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703283,0.0023925758,0.020681629,0.004419458,0.00064425525,0.00018928728,0.000028946482,0.000039404924,0.0012761486],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8382611,0.12710106,0.006051805,0.004470015,0.020521777,0.0035942546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6262909,0.22383016,0.05490327,0.023713365,0.053970855,0.017291522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1706826,0.00032746128,0.0006714154,0.007906958,0.008467574,0.01499195,0.0016944888,0.002068212,0.0024366085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29712945,0.0003529406,0.00036256778,0.007886863,0.01733161,0.0172787,0.009095788,0.0037433768,0.0004565959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008129028,0.00033879868,0.18394387,0.0016421535,0.00023262363,0.0004643051,0.23419562,0.0010034587,0.0023332427,0.2098471,0.011988919,0.3539287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073680676,0.0005212049,0.29522756,0.0041376487,0.00016467269,0.0010107782,0.21235397,0.0054784,0.0025632083,0.2791456,0.19908252,0.00024064214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038079256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006525231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008204927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024149053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9026666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404709284","doi":"10.2004/wjst.v10i4.852","title":"Editorial Preface","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.8027883020527181,"score_gpt":0.7343855149477503,"score_spread":0.06840278710496783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404709284","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024978016,0.0035475162,0.0010591755,0.033611644,0.9186105,0.00016522549,0.00092615647,0.0008209682,0.041009013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004637479,0.0071189706,0.0020225716,0.027206937,0.7404804,0.00025925878,0.0024518988,0.0014250227,0.21439745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942508,0.00059129746,0.00060580595,0.0008706912,0.003287288,0.00039424552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522172,0.0065881643,0.0024517877,0.0020094549,0.030246105,0.006487243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041905274,0.002144946,0.0014957673,0.0044681337,0.0039712037,0.008798412,0.0021456103,0.003815728,0.22782274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04205383,0.000686901,0.0012079172,0.0019036396,0.0013770636,0.0043228674,0.0024431113,0.007436932,0.18044652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015113298,0.0000074807253,0.000044642733,0.00010978346,0.000002589062,0.00005982746,0.000032115786,0.0000204818,0.00006814686,0.00044680916,0.9876336,0.011559397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008816204,0.000017223814,0.00015150663,0.00021536864,0.000003994684,0.0001596706,0.00006736839,0.000042012613,0.000094271265,0.0008576988,0.9983713,0.000010742481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012448623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017062463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7721773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002438219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004229569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76214296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404734563","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110370","title":"Impact factors and publication times of original scientific research in radiology journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Imaging","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Vancouver General Hospital; University of British Columbia; BC Cancer Agency; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical physics; Impact factor; Radiology","score_opus":0.8628176660417445,"score_gpt":0.7496248331863482,"score_spread":0.11319283285539627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404734563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656701,0.021235818,0.002213627,0.0011197374,0.0003506437,0.00010746906,0.002781278,0.0002903176,0.0062310863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805654,0.005154536,0.0024238026,0.00009698728,0.00061111595,0.000100018384,0.0021386994,0.00009120145,0.0013270638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479456,0.0027912727,0.003782539,0.0012092817,0.006786277,0.00063609367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6903034,0.1410131,0.12008563,0.00778023,0.02898441,0.011833265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593217,0.000657377,0.0010903333,0.01963623,0.00094606244,0.004398546,0.000812194,0.0006908564,0.0058137192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13737759,0.00030225588,0.001465551,0.02257301,0.0007061512,0.0028703369,0.0014116862,0.0007455414,0.0023204486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088151335,0.00021704198,0.9017818,0.0018949576,0.0007103358,0.0004393296,0.0013185861,0.0007803376,0.0028996505,0.00054059114,0.001513748,0.0870221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027171767,0.0005510859,0.9884405,0.0002877295,0.00021366341,0.0013797069,0.00091935194,0.0005724498,0.0018063707,0.00082103495,0.004921441,0.00005951858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009906598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088607636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98406786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015267127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002504883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08425838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905567","doi":"10.32920/27940890.v1","title":"Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Information retrieval; Operating system","score_opus":0.9025638254961048,"score_gpt":0.6849236624817889,"score_spread":0.21764016301431588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905567","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10258734,0.010881284,0.13114777,0.031226866,0.0064320182,0.0046169925,0.36525756,0.08525557,0.2625946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2842301,0.013778745,0.3611211,0.0034161767,0.0038737995,0.005089098,0.24873422,0.02066247,0.0590943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773628,0.0031875705,0.0036225931,0.0025279673,0.012554828,0.0007443059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919267,0.035951138,0.023992106,0.015516087,0.028732069,0.0038819064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02235514,0.0015408803,0.0014657903,0.091520734,0.0028493893,0.015210397,0.0024315997,0.0015204867,0.009210175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10318021,0.0010453919,0.0014929817,0.095506564,0.0013110933,0.012336977,0.005475132,0.0018479895,0.012661914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019965244,0.00010248774,0.045594744,0.0053042816,0.0004299143,0.0006495153,0.007836911,0.0019358074,0.0033391917,0.0271968,0.37592518,0.53148556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009714615,0.0001605647,0.060204275,0.001940131,0.00026324362,0.00048089892,0.004546809,0.01173632,0.006752472,0.02914596,0.8842712,0.00040092226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01584621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023622071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97764486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034125438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009500167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11822671},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404905576","doi":"10.32920/27940890","title":"Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Operating system","score_opus":0.9025638254961048,"score_gpt":0.6849236624817889,"score_spread":0.21764016301431588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905576","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10258734,0.010881284,0.13114777,0.031226866,0.0064320182,0.0046169925,0.36525756,0.08525557,0.2625946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2842301,0.013778745,0.3611211,0.0034161767,0.0038737995,0.005089098,0.24873422,0.02066247,0.0590943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773628,0.0031875705,0.0036225931,0.0025279673,0.012554828,0.0007443059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919267,0.035951138,0.023992106,0.015516087,0.028732069,0.0038819064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02235514,0.0015408803,0.0014657903,0.091520734,0.0028493893,0.015210397,0.0024315997,0.0015204867,0.009210175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10318021,0.0010453919,0.0014929817,0.095506564,0.0013110933,0.012336977,0.005475132,0.0018479895,0.012661914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019965244,0.00010248774,0.045594744,0.0053042816,0.0004299143,0.0006495153,0.007836911,0.0019358074,0.0033391917,0.0271968,0.37592518,0.53148556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009714615,0.0001605647,0.060204275,0.001940131,0.00026324362,0.00048089892,0.004546809,0.01173632,0.006752472,0.02914596,0.8842712,0.00040092226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01584621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023622071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97764486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034125438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009500167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11822671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905603","doi":"10.32920/27934593.v1","title":"Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Key (lock); Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Library science; Chemistry; Biology; Computer security","score_opus":0.6378472806550276,"score_gpt":0.6182650425351772,"score_spread":0.01958223811985038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002596114,0.047277156,0.013257302,0.46025482,0.3958601,0.002642809,0.0011364536,0.0017729077,0.07753887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008737655,0.11510104,0.028024722,0.22669727,0.45245802,0.0049543255,0.0024058938,0.0043179006,0.15730318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8696395,0.049486242,0.020446563,0.005867995,0.05104589,0.00351382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51438147,0.2520175,0.029951999,0.020430475,0.16136666,0.02185186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09413988,0.002649495,0.002273322,0.008428362,0.0045146886,0.02288236,0.00590399,0.013030348,0.14503188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37716648,0.0017680144,0.0020968725,0.009118689,0.006152706,0.019715648,0.01007724,0.019893568,0.13764982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019451329,0.00001805206,0.000051263505,0.0011122412,0.0000074008253,0.000047436184,0.00027540114,0.00004755304,0.00011692332,0.003737051,0.9489252,0.045642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009515275,0.000016308031,0.000095649564,0.0014622617,0.000005160003,0.00012599389,0.00017968706,0.000044247594,0.000090433365,0.0036675583,0.9942854,0.000017723958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011705139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014180412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008998048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020893486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4978652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905618","doi":"10.32920/27934593","title":"Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Series (stratigraphy); Primer (cosmetics); Computer science; Biology; Computer security; Chemistry; Paleontology","score_opus":0.6378472806550276,"score_gpt":0.6182650425351772,"score_spread":0.01958223811985038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002596114,0.047277156,0.013257302,0.46025482,0.3958601,0.002642809,0.0011364536,0.0017729077,0.07753887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008737655,0.11510104,0.028024722,0.22669727,0.45245802,0.0049543255,0.0024058938,0.0043179006,0.15730318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8696395,0.049486242,0.020446563,0.005867995,0.05104589,0.00351382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51438147,0.2520175,0.029951999,0.020430475,0.16136666,0.02185186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09413988,0.002649495,0.002273322,0.008428362,0.0045146886,0.02288236,0.00590399,0.013030348,0.14503188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37716648,0.0017680144,0.0020968725,0.009118689,0.006152706,0.019715648,0.01007724,0.019893568,0.13764982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019451329,0.00001805206,0.000051263505,0.0011122412,0.0000074008253,0.000047436184,0.00027540114,0.00004755304,0.00011692332,0.003737051,0.9489252,0.045642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009515275,0.000016308031,0.000095649564,0.0014622617,0.000005160003,0.00012599389,0.00017968706,0.000044247594,0.000090433365,0.0036675583,0.9942854,0.000017723958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011705139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014180412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008998048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020893486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4978652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404923347","doi":"10.1037/cep0000361","title":"Encouraging registered reports at the Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology (CJEP): An invited tutorial by Oshiro et al. (2024).","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Medical education; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3810346380568204,"score_gpt":0.538014081133725,"score_spread":0.15697944307690453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404923347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025219643,0.044709638,0.040465523,0.5503877,0.2577572,0.0072639487,0.005424684,0.0072154705,0.08425386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0209462,0.08851025,0.15692796,0.21775125,0.1030884,0.01611266,0.0098876385,0.00858568,0.37818995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9369924,0.025798418,0.0049421648,0.0023737631,0.027218496,0.0026747633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67260844,0.082013465,0.019302435,0.020087989,0.16760667,0.03838111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1285872,0.0015843312,0.0014370285,0.012571447,0.0072019314,0.011836511,0.006100831,0.007848493,0.10153175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2822838,0.0018946346,0.0023587279,0.009329067,0.004184061,0.010414318,0.010907018,0.009214445,0.08027273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031141863,0.00004486789,0.00015364579,0.00039402628,0.000010768972,0.00003889419,0.00037800375,0.00001285299,0.00020543831,0.0009507665,0.9482135,0.04956609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027494036,0.000026347594,0.00065845565,0.00046608524,0.000011262908,0.00007138887,0.0004140825,0.000039972885,0.00020925885,0.0013625314,0.99667215,0.00004097572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028313486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111198515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99389917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073002717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04804365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68004227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405093764","doi":"10.3138/cjc-2023-0027","title":"Fraudulent Practices in the Field of Academic Publishing: The Latindex Experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Profit (economics); Political science; Library science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.6746492702885274,"score_gpt":0.623376634944687,"score_spread":0.05127263534384041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405093764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75034827,0.015418226,0.0012658027,0.114816524,0.00093538186,0.00008606098,0.00021243597,0.00012534393,0.11679195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96307385,0.01024951,0.0007093953,0.011433664,0.0005142846,0.000060569244,0.00011812198,0.00010408563,0.013736513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743149,0.013676681,0.0020560953,0.0013027673,0.006583694,0.0020658304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81683683,0.09980495,0.031446993,0.010927585,0.02037227,0.020611282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023527637,0.00034388585,0.0006390315,0.006342328,0.010920484,0.02366782,0.0017476843,0.0033295804,0.009833458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099036075,0.0003305587,0.00034795745,0.01167211,0.018931335,0.010510542,0.017805057,0.0038463403,0.0016163521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051323645,0.00059325097,0.21962512,0.0008476474,0.00007815945,0.011560572,0.44137156,0.0002783221,0.001201897,0.106347114,0.043623425,0.17395976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007244795,0.00021186187,0.05710054,0.0019162081,0.000035010897,0.007712611,0.3766457,0.00042524672,0.00076552253,0.01335692,0.5416341,0.00012385173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019690653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017612003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126199145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016186409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1244275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405349341","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3731","title":"CJHP Joins the International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE), formerly known as the “Granada Group”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Joins; Pharmacy; Library science; Group (periodic table); Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Computer science; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.1535736718095057,"score_gpt":0.4918691170685766,"score_spread":0.3382954452590709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405349341","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014057297,0.0025291822,0.00013461597,0.06204683,0.93193334,0.00006761813,0.0000640581,0.000101783204,0.00298195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026639116,0.0047710342,0.000759239,0.045245357,0.9167623,0.00009735104,0.00013114577,0.00018536598,0.02938431],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832607,0.0013613317,0.0012963162,0.0011291153,0.011745501,0.0012070874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85240984,0.019247951,0.00541855,0.0027271411,0.08499579,0.035200745],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01659935,0.0025476543,0.0028502198,0.006965428,0.0075911516,0.014455425,0.004135661,0.014419418,0.016053496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059837706,0.0009035204,0.0019769892,0.0038945598,0.0029366505,0.0044156965,0.0024158475,0.014985468,0.009222406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031071882,0.00001709595,0.00008274441,0.00013124086,0.00001219198,0.00018818598,0.000021901824,0.000019510415,0.000052892316,0.00026281175,0.9936435,0.0055367695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006241399,0.000023161725,0.0004174824,0.00023892822,0.000026447182,0.0002587743,0.00013290055,0.00010107686,0.00011956378,0.00063227257,0.9979665,0.00002052747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00861888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029859317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98554456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007955753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022852095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087786734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405349382","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3744","title":"Le JCPH se joint au International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE), anciennement connu sous le nom de « Granada Group »","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmacy; Humanities; Joint (building); Library science; Political science; Art; Medicine; Family medicine; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1676729555459541,"score_gpt":0.4629586838897999,"score_spread":0.2952857283438458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405349382","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005338162,0.0028690784,0.00011781306,0.04620751,0.9499277,0.000022435923,0.000058167112,0.00004945018,0.00069446437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082130684,0.0025412743,0.0002713142,0.018245399,0.9703936,0.000042349264,0.00003722302,0.000047604066,0.007600017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98113567,0.0023894105,0.0020652018,0.0020208852,0.011040145,0.0013486954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90176105,0.03195291,0.005175617,0.0022292333,0.043072566,0.015808651],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020990383,0.0047235317,0.0061570024,0.009947335,0.0067247027,0.01727444,0.0049459436,0.029973997,0.012209063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08708667,0.0015146991,0.003949374,0.0040283184,0.0038905276,0.0049157515,0.0024964677,0.021571532,0.007937825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007194737,0.000016550672,0.00008488685,0.00025071326,0.000033725555,0.0002017385,0.000020363286,0.000024817085,0.000053946507,0.00031095985,0.9944887,0.0044416683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020907364,0.00003824881,0.0006894767,0.0005733531,0.00010903234,0.0004890215,0.000108927896,0.00026799107,0.00019638141,0.0010263101,0.9962592,0.000033033783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009524924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026314992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98272556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009033981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015200072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11100912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405430762","doi":"10.62212/snahp.173","title":"Promouvoir l’intégrité en recherche : des principes à la pratique dans les revues scientifiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.8978583552714805,"score_gpt":0.7284726311922732,"score_spread":0.16938572407920727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405430762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002329122,0.22166404,0.052481197,0.675222,0.018749373,0.00040922474,0.0002925349,0.000381518,0.028471027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21445179,0.26096055,0.2582279,0.1910244,0.03762693,0.0052440194,0.00087376736,0.0010405342,0.030550092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.51817787,0.33565217,0.032116454,0.018438276,0.08992495,0.00569028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26735917,0.5279727,0.022192383,0.080395885,0.09051048,0.0115693165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45734474,0.0021674547,0.005802562,0.010589371,0.009695062,0.04874029,0.0069207675,0.02216231,0.005871483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45329487,0.0025040288,0.003967081,0.012294827,0.08507744,0.057161853,0.025429074,0.03695845,0.005123238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021225667,0.00014185887,0.001703664,0.008002867,0.00052104326,0.00016508478,0.0134873465,0.0006073393,0.0010717646,0.7574398,0.082324654,0.13432238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511155,0.00014568576,0.001331597,0.009604666,0.00017914339,0.0002442238,0.004009338,0.0005594146,0.0011195502,0.6155725,0.36691174,0.00017103474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047114547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049110437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015985442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06894745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6691905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405540325","doi":"10.18438/eblip30493","title":"Analyzing and Assessing a Library Collection Using Faculty Citations Via OpenAlex and R","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Information retrieval; Collection development; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.3987243497607244,"score_gpt":0.5395182772928999,"score_spread":0.1407939275321755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405540325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8535919,0.002990354,0.051680334,0.003059237,0.0002857949,0.0013264467,0.016023876,0.005072751,0.06596918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85349524,0.0022284144,0.11755663,0.00031145161,0.00032268724,0.0010376332,0.010948596,0.0008725091,0.013226775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96920073,0.007266831,0.004375659,0.001991862,0.016292483,0.0008724469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8545757,0.06264304,0.028211717,0.010942374,0.040709727,0.002917524],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026925433,0.0006472662,0.0010273844,0.07034304,0.003398093,0.00953031,0.0019127157,0.0007440378,0.0065327757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087048955,0.00034943994,0.0010510184,0.07048627,0.0016576619,0.0057529216,0.0056387605,0.00077818165,0.0022278691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024383965,0.0003208793,0.34205008,0.0029157968,0.0004013391,0.0017744544,0.028252197,0.0033636703,0.00817589,0.016778521,0.022552505,0.5731709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007406845,0.0008669308,0.6871478,0.0019829394,0.00042973278,0.0026547443,0.048446182,0.016894376,0.032604583,0.014344944,0.19397923,0.00057451235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006724569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012972267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067826295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14239699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405540378","doi":"10.18438/eblip30665","title":"Evidence Summary Theme: Open Access","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.5818519236961829,"score_gpt":0.5919576860470508,"score_spread":0.010105762350867908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405540378","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009898983,0.5764951,0.005158613,0.29297838,0.064253464,0.0029117824,0.010319209,0.00016650172,0.046727125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036573153,0.6284389,0.01721373,0.24214064,0.044216618,0.011685377,0.008008305,0.00035256305,0.011370753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8454535,0.055972897,0.036751304,0.008229336,0.050763886,0.0028291498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60134387,0.27932736,0.04019249,0.011243492,0.06195806,0.005934674],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081970155,0.0014290382,0.0040705823,0.014045304,0.0029757838,0.013840864,0.004979016,0.012825433,0.05116108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3882108,0.0011283702,0.0055934116,0.017438775,0.004522531,0.012633934,0.009790086,0.013534276,0.008417227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004901799,0.00006374044,0.0015511699,0.25456133,0.0013471755,0.00013016647,0.0009913425,0.00010843916,0.00018780206,0.03642628,0.39264187,0.31150052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021912492,0.00012033915,0.0022281967,0.33553964,0.00149963,0.00021792225,0.0012271128,0.00008706749,0.00030271296,0.013168088,0.64534783,0.00004236453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041895662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005307951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011895283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027578173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43350482},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4405566202","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v19i1.7596","title":"Researcher Perspectives on Obstacles and Facilitators of Open Scholarship at a Canadian University","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.5419767006233982,"score_gpt":0.5462512252384185,"score_spread":0.004274524615020314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405566202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96702075,0.0012748437,0.00030179406,0.01820816,0.00009508686,0.00016761027,0.00015125888,0.000023126411,0.0127572855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912213,0.0015986258,0.0006142421,0.0017320678,0.000034117773,0.00010416637,0.0000475819,0.000010453971,0.0046374737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716883,0.011251873,0.0015544089,0.0014270268,0.006349044,0.00772952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380388,0.020471739,0.0065217842,0.0011128738,0.015256801,0.018598054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027116513,0.00041688498,0.00085385365,0.0044220844,0.029700961,0.011739057,0.003208422,0.0024602192,0.0035481586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044889756,0.0008244146,0.0006330081,0.0068158386,0.009421499,0.003134703,0.009293302,0.0031644143,0.00032540484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010127611,0.00008214944,0.07233125,0.00023257534,0.00001393674,0.0012238241,0.90104526,0.00012068337,0.0007623147,0.0027365605,0.0024553484,0.018894773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047731783,0.00004191628,0.018719576,0.00012531073,0.0000071279173,0.000087533066,0.96969604,0.000064418,0.00013331234,0.00015989397,0.010930047,0.000029961895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85204065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91124034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080005914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1527597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58048624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405734082","doi":"10.1177/25152459241283477","title":"Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Arnold Ventures; Strong; State Government of Victoria; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Field (mathematics); Political science; Empirical research; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.8275100584952197,"score_gpt":0.8086616933891463,"score_spread":0.01884836510607346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405734082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690298,0.018513486,0.0008001798,0.0025638682,0.000113957016,0.00026357386,0.0054910863,0.000043411565,0.003180647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906151,0.00447415,0.0010063818,0.0007084702,0.00020723556,0.00034826907,0.002171744,0.00004122053,0.00042739298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91727346,0.025206238,0.030247653,0.0065311478,0.01917028,0.0015712883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33421114,0.30657336,0.29300454,0.013825131,0.046086613,0.006299224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0645896,0.00042646108,0.0013125726,0.026239086,0.0014186268,0.005965922,0.0020193367,0.0017550915,0.003187105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30921254,0.0008369141,0.0013399669,0.024867235,0.0023511224,0.0077300905,0.0035787195,0.001492843,0.0010127245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030393968,0.00013070801,0.974906,0.0026970112,0.0006536547,0.00032146575,0.005856873,0.000081296326,0.0003735774,0.00043056358,0.002323064,0.011921785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035495188,0.00015956082,0.9838784,0.0022282996,0.00030147296,0.0011811623,0.0065728324,0.00031081532,0.00028928186,0.00025692015,0.0047322856,0.00005362579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030973654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003396806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018066044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025223596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34158653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405881678","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v15n4p22","title":"The Role of ESG Performance in Enhancing Intellectual Capital and Sustainability in European Football Clubs: A First Empirical Application","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Football; Corporate governance; Business; Social capital; Intellectual capital; Sustainability; Marketing; Relational capital; Accounting; Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Finance; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13939874979540084,"score_gpt":0.4865201036627376,"score_spread":0.3471213538673368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405881678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918744,0.00032940737,0.0005344158,0.000106855136,0.000006826351,0.000042055028,0.00026132527,0.0000072279845,0.006837548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892575,0.00010185576,0.00037118656,0.000017650153,0.000011417987,0.000021936661,0.00015684043,0.0000016846446,0.00039160965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970599,0.0011808954,0.00021288524,0.00038795933,0.0007047576,0.00045367941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787805,0.011817853,0.004312957,0.0010984225,0.0022536272,0.0017366454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054647923,0.00042880687,0.00040558074,0.0047566397,0.00084090943,0.0031142887,0.0004728603,0.00066666456,0.0035981678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016003912,0.0000825088,0.00040260743,0.0060055763,0.0015642197,0.0014004624,0.002309818,0.00045652842,0.00033686205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018162497,0.0005513724,0.9464315,0.00019214803,0.00012494418,0.00021534544,0.0017270563,0.0009877279,0.0002739768,0.0019453106,0.0004408853,0.046927918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013149595,0.00024156913,0.9913317,0.0001192401,0.000056793764,0.00006549521,0.0035963105,0.0011044494,0.0003996495,0.00076424616,0.0022977006,0.000009622431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00785625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009453478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00785625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017387692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018849955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028900921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405901445","doi":"","title":"Making the Move to Open Journal Systems 3: Recommendations for a (mostly) painless upgrade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Upgrade; Computer science; World Wide Web; Operating system","score_opus":0.8221029351515965,"score_gpt":0.6858394329636437,"score_spread":0.1362635021879528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405901445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043595443,0.0023566035,0.010391083,0.92378265,0.020308776,0.0011312026,0.0005661769,0.006885327,0.030218555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0536968,0.014170508,0.26331356,0.536523,0.023942314,0.0050188364,0.003936089,0.006709844,0.092689134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88950616,0.034548227,0.017297054,0.0047592395,0.044209458,0.009679901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4720731,0.1431201,0.027638132,0.03671339,0.20994152,0.11051373],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13506487,0.0013810134,0.0010368816,0.007829208,0.009073004,0.03350267,0.0076855887,0.022188872,0.038010318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3767326,0.0018550077,0.0033393505,0.0077063604,0.008979269,0.038086426,0.012225701,0.023321372,0.027481783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083786355,0.0003110508,0.0018464053,0.00050386577,0.000025039179,0.00027154575,0.0017617254,0.00029303945,0.0006195498,0.010417894,0.90304327,0.08082282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019679168,0.00022787602,0.0053942194,0.0014951339,0.00003859277,0.00029154072,0.004138555,0.00045127975,0.0006290986,0.009589479,0.9773517,0.00019559533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017968766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037574165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009458191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061828587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71429986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405936732","doi":"10.1109/la-cci62337.2024.10814799","title":"Improvements to Dual Annealing in SciPy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Annealing (glass); Computer science; Materials science","score_opus":0.7238762468832122,"score_gpt":0.6636454143631704,"score_spread":0.0602308325200418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405936732","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011950287,0.00062959985,0.9385746,0.00085541955,0.0006399102,0.00017850565,0.0005100498,0.0152784,0.031383213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1518575,0.0005824219,0.8227586,0.0010168813,0.00032105233,0.00090161554,0.0014117945,0.0061252113,0.015024906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747854,0.0009915029,0.00010960193,0.000313552,0.0008570356,0.00024963645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970446,0.0008385997,0.00012170553,0.0010753508,0.0007002811,0.00021936536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026953225,0.0014443396,0.001872134,0.0011510311,0.0011828076,0.0022473768,0.0029531673,0.0020180035,0.019798577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010673205,0.0007472753,0.0024838771,0.0018768223,0.0009776801,0.0017160419,0.003420509,0.004663611,0.009843808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010850059,0.0007400033,0.0017900822,0.00089870754,0.00037555138,0.0003182543,0.00032398303,0.3163951,0.027750384,0.21561831,0.049804162,0.38490036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020492352,0.00020474789,0.0008451137,0.000077759876,0.0000767957,0.00020091051,0.00003607211,0.8532023,0.011124979,0.05105878,0.08288371,0.00008400481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003649737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019798577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010951123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002782052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06623286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406195046","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01282-9","title":"Investigating the trustworthiness of research evidence used to inform public health policy: a qualitative interview study on the use of predatory journal citations in policy documents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Health services research; Public health; Trustworthiness; Health administration; Health policy; Qualitative research; Peer review; Health economics; Public health policy; Social policy; Public policy; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Nursing; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9789561516613032,"score_gpt":0.7890776357586877,"score_spread":0.1898785159026155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406195046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395352,0.003148261,0.015734095,0.030597415,0.00018917977,0.0006621985,0.00013493303,0.000047157442,0.009951554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917881,0.0013798781,0.0037849788,0.0017630901,0.000045885416,0.00036999505,0.000038649643,0.000034786022,0.0007948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7162776,0.24457327,0.011431328,0.004463002,0.01610926,0.0071455305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37447494,0.57717156,0.020822806,0.005518876,0.015494906,0.006517024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20513465,0.00067267974,0.0020654427,0.007809346,0.01855297,0.014137033,0.0031912585,0.005675072,0.0018113288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3522258,0.0016868213,0.00082234124,0.0074155233,0.028636813,0.01376035,0.01387792,0.007584947,0.0004008588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027954127,0.00001744991,0.001819868,0.00025245672,0.000010476731,0.00048593164,0.99081916,0.000056980483,0.0005651509,0.002463707,0.00018486872,0.003295921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011506692,0.00005248638,0.0010115393,0.0006491991,0.000014531319,0.00032292175,0.9830514,0.00031575913,0.00047783947,0.0024597573,0.011598429,0.000034545355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008933613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006536719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019546406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024055067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802105},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406367101","doi":"10.1002/asi.24979","title":"Evaluating the linguistic coverage of <scp>OpenAlex</scp>: An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Scopus; Publishing; English language; Completeness (order theory); World Wide Web; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Library science; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.37366020321620774,"score_gpt":0.602059430984761,"score_spread":0.22839922776855326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406367101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92205316,0.0035997282,0.020218719,0.0028848238,0.00032059787,0.0005375385,0.01117259,0.00040097005,0.038811922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97535,0.0010744438,0.010567869,0.00028229115,0.00015211657,0.00044872405,0.009997116,0.00021523332,0.001912324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9110028,0.02716865,0.016852273,0.005180648,0.038457174,0.001338461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53106546,0.26814377,0.05682779,0.03855127,0.10316208,0.0022496192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083191,0.00047479136,0.001037993,0.033839278,0.0019778777,0.007000898,0.0014255288,0.00088688935,0.003851212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31075004,0.0002936801,0.0010209953,0.02765731,0.0037667754,0.0049890117,0.009023609,0.00063272397,0.0013939138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065590336,0.0002082017,0.6625879,0.005697183,0.0010218096,0.0006655037,0.037730906,0.0025262153,0.0052995677,0.017952513,0.016079592,0.24957469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066759116,0.00033551003,0.80261755,0.005614898,0.00093244266,0.0011136131,0.043819744,0.01125672,0.016448056,0.012290373,0.105263725,0.00024067883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049942452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005348494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021475826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035699524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4399613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406433090","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5088105","title":"equity is not Equity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Equity capital markets; Business; Economics; Finance; Private equity; Political science","score_opus":0.4862423886454763,"score_gpt":0.6123007699302478,"score_spread":0.12605838128477154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406433090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119663745,0.0042075505,0.022317605,0.11196231,0.0022125954,0.000086508386,0.0007128576,0.00007866559,0.7387582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447151,0.00092415296,0.0011106035,0.009164275,0.001483691,0.000054800563,0.00014550764,0.000041655654,0.042360187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547184,0.00076197926,0.0002320048,0.0010697043,0.0015038608,0.0009605773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98916143,0.0049015014,0.0018363304,0.0010902452,0.0019354363,0.0010750795],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034166393,0.00042686288,0.0008798552,0.0013828679,0.001926124,0.0062586614,0.0008579309,0.0031162612,0.024830554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017907465,0.000278167,0.00043778092,0.0011354046,0.008807008,0.011569814,0.0030874338,0.004812609,0.001962785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027285185,0.00003131402,0.0019832694,0.00003455011,0.00003121021,0.00006645414,0.00021560503,0.00015152403,0.00011370237,0.980823,0.0067160805,0.00980603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113969345,0.000011786128,0.001200253,0.00002952477,0.00001468183,0.00005612743,0.00025965116,0.00022159952,0.00013495251,0.9849583,0.013095112,0.0000067054093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031247148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020877041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019533443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00195421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08306646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406620494","doi":"10.1111/nin.12698","title":"On the Evolving Complexities of Peer Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Psychology; Data science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.6524244283368151,"score_gpt":0.6144268947219702,"score_spread":0.037997533614844925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406620494","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027568007,0.08108501,0.0428315,0.79590744,0.03126801,0.00038109522,0.000101329584,0.0005417886,0.045126982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32412973,0.18388048,0.13593258,0.19732665,0.122536965,0.0035148428,0.00033009917,0.0030312815,0.02931748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.30149806,0.47163492,0.037677407,0.032875657,0.14765275,0.008661321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08964378,0.661128,0.025987184,0.06237815,0.14165805,0.019204924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5501543,0.0016375624,0.004582045,0.014055894,0.025958173,0.07368307,0.013462802,0.027686505,0.010523007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.75372756,0.0028552944,0.0025302689,0.010702322,0.14227197,0.07493713,0.038336728,0.036133934,0.007386368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008959213,0.00005223362,0.0010550721,0.0031935375,0.00025915075,0.0008742694,0.04946696,0.0011066081,0.00035414967,0.5672178,0.18972455,0.18660602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073953,0.00006155208,0.0007117258,0.005091913,0.000036647667,0.0005474894,0.0103074815,0.00069132925,0.00018423678,0.4042353,0.57784134,0.00024031538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006021064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008695007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44984567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0223329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08236376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55473983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406633347","doi":"10.1039/d4dd90053g","title":"Commit: Mini article for dynamic reporting of incremental improvements to previous scholarly work","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Discovery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Work (physics); Computer science; Data science; Database; Engineering","score_opus":0.30089369212540784,"score_gpt":0.531694957699371,"score_spread":0.2308012655739632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406633347","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069359834,0.0033511762,0.23217037,0.07512537,0.254538,0.005819945,0.08209219,0.19701897,0.142948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049556416,0.004932521,0.37816325,0.027665611,0.09140364,0.008792068,0.09170882,0.07397622,0.27380145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664826,0.0074668517,0.0047099716,0.0019559606,0.017737456,0.0016472026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7133654,0.09535878,0.026466243,0.045820683,0.098713845,0.02027515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022287812,0.0021093024,0.0015777715,0.015335272,0.0032657462,0.016427321,0.0040574814,0.005294695,0.19570094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2533712,0.0021879256,0.0013148611,0.009109224,0.0025848316,0.01232235,0.012969398,0.0052300347,0.1446967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017057413,0.000063061656,0.0007228373,0.00044505196,0.00002466684,0.00007166022,0.00011477095,0.00011561992,0.0010015671,0.003407693,0.9364672,0.057395317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001191338,0.00013630353,0.0015828618,0.00035605268,0.000038089147,0.0002846206,0.00016971905,0.0013294166,0.003896326,0.004195022,0.98773706,0.00015542423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019005093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035765604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003355392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009325903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6546849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406652426","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v11.42153","title":"An Environmental Scan of Bibliometrics and Research Impact Open Instructional Trends at Canadian Academic Research Libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Library science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7118459255119588,"score_gpt":0.6195203741576483,"score_spread":0.09232555135431053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406652426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80214655,0.0125850765,0.006083457,0.01142511,0.00022443222,0.0012971112,0.015851492,0.00088679674,0.14949998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95022607,0.009435211,0.015024552,0.0014733585,0.000074273754,0.000627784,0.00471876,0.00024881237,0.018171133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532413,0.00698575,0.0031015477,0.002106429,0.0314335,0.0031314064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84839565,0.037034575,0.015161702,0.004953539,0.08945126,0.0050031715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017982671,0.00044842588,0.0007195776,0.053121287,0.0093910815,0.006796424,0.0017885852,0.00080693705,0.00347793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07497932,0.0006246673,0.0004978127,0.091030575,0.0054172077,0.003551662,0.005666366,0.00079106743,0.00087052584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023069423,0.00012387734,0.21133101,0.0057598264,0.00012247056,0.0020462202,0.2483129,0.00066240056,0.0075155986,0.018818075,0.03931603,0.46576095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011991467,0.00014704665,0.5245122,0.002095363,0.00012972987,0.00092287495,0.15233478,0.0006356127,0.004642198,0.001601666,0.31274515,0.00022131906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81180054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9264958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043993708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14778426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37861556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406674461","doi":"10.7202/1115297ar","title":"La science comme champ","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.9526441350234139,"score_gpt":0.7574967400603366,"score_spread":0.19514739496307731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406674461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007994159,0.0060077053,0.02158768,0.06845916,0.002765742,0.00013659925,0.0003965006,0.0004021497,0.89225036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48418036,0.011229438,0.029180266,0.0142677445,0.0039363424,0.0006135769,0.00072699075,0.0005213119,0.45534396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942756,0.0018435008,0.00023160009,0.0011531883,0.0021011017,0.00039501014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993244,0.0020919952,0.00048764332,0.0011567979,0.0022550055,0.000764658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050927587,0.0006906353,0.0006994125,0.0027469818,0.004832409,0.016633859,0.0011983921,0.004061889,0.044895664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010594923,0.00038436314,0.00049423,0.0035763446,0.018288687,0.016232397,0.006102277,0.004475942,0.01173524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009348933,0.000006378617,0.000274258,0.00007213428,0.000007008815,0.000037729238,0.0021113502,0.00008504905,0.00020966496,0.96918666,0.013970774,0.014029548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071804257,0.000018848947,0.0002857138,0.00017381439,0.0000059827466,0.000084319785,0.0018254912,0.00014042974,0.00015725376,0.31118643,0.68610114,0.000013375099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050624115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063860784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056684106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008065649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15019101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406900259","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77193","title":"Reviewers’ views on the editorial review processes of the Canadian Medical Education Journal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Medical education; Work (physics); Descriptive statistics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2878703393976841,"score_gpt":0.5613766508686644,"score_spread":0.2735063114709803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406900259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21559434,0.049486954,0.0037815406,0.5652946,0.032859545,0.0012547488,0.0011494115,0.00051697483,0.13006179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92913055,0.012670443,0.004586662,0.030539963,0.006499258,0.00034806668,0.0002946511,0.0002565585,0.015673844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7202588,0.11513449,0.015811764,0.007255305,0.12584034,0.015699461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2627821,0.1949504,0.05114845,0.01002485,0.38955608,0.0915381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15471397,0.0007011206,0.0010585412,0.0063749384,0.024390299,0.022714322,0.0037174819,0.005293103,0.0060462183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5211101,0.0009071944,0.0010173905,0.0073039015,0.010181526,0.004259794,0.0056180623,0.005226568,0.0011211775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013550244,0.00015832097,0.061843995,0.004252991,0.00031331263,0.0035492466,0.24848366,0.0005799608,0.0025017692,0.010280433,0.48776093,0.17892034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016730097,0.00028131725,0.0795662,0.0034064509,0.00016735728,0.0013163295,0.13131398,0.000589662,0.0011681779,0.002931576,0.77848876,0.00060287566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50904423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6285626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92938846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07061155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23270501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406946826","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1","title":"A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Communications Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8712495094375736,"score_gpt":0.7657096778831722,"score_spread":0.10553983155440139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406946826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018223647,0.24488059,0.032972842,0.60841686,0.034857158,0.00076741364,0.0007900368,0.0005253633,0.07496741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14465985,0.37635878,0.1439675,0.2604078,0.020283682,0.0047788015,0.0022681032,0.0010415842,0.04623386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93387336,0.03297509,0.008664102,0.0031688449,0.01936497,0.0019535806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91933066,0.043301806,0.0063686604,0.010230085,0.014393885,0.006374895],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12210068,0.0012127571,0.0014672029,0.006994099,0.004479113,0.022287348,0.002646192,0.009367082,0.0044920505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096457474,0.0010069659,0.0017661662,0.005674757,0.021288175,0.018308586,0.015992308,0.018825924,0.0028223163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038565522,0.0000383525,0.0003013768,0.0066557354,0.00008988645,0.00016636545,0.0035296169,0.00024054496,0.0006268835,0.7536707,0.13003418,0.104607835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025153373,0.000031515898,0.0004762632,0.007433799,0.000053207714,0.00013702382,0.0010686056,0.00006754484,0.00018702129,0.08511954,0.905371,0.000029352861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061532985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009012922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011510146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06296571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6457378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407036447","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.154408.2","title":"Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Open peer review; Transparency (behavior); Plant biology; Delphi; Delphi method; Open science; Physiology; Psychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Statistics; Botany","score_opus":0.8494189618904909,"score_gpt":0.6382811941320977,"score_spread":0.2111377677583932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407036447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823767,0.000052777803,0.007708634,0.0013127435,0.00006149138,0.006016291,0.0001136889,0.000035197016,0.002322362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682478,0.00012783354,0.0148198055,0.0014122484,0.000039451334,0.0144234905,0.0001041786,0.000031843567,0.00079347735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8778276,0.1016641,0.0055535934,0.002673737,0.005961606,0.0063193357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7981664,0.15419592,0.0066617145,0.007639645,0.026807873,0.006528383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.165666,0.0007715303,0.0007330316,0.0023351647,0.0062362864,0.0041677617,0.0019085292,0.002713487,0.0034303374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15861349,0.0012865467,0.0011975972,0.0019529669,0.004298798,0.006313939,0.007174667,0.0034926462,0.0008213021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010544774,0.0025534143,0.04822406,0.0011911409,0.00009389451,0.0011157403,0.870198,0.00096340175,0.004213041,0.0035032805,0.0034142726,0.06347524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005153818,0.0063948766,0.051977314,0.00066556176,0.000088431436,0.0005831217,0.90722835,0.0049281134,0.004115159,0.0034384965,0.019790616,0.00027453172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019246514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028058859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99583226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005931862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01043509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.876136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407111140","doi":"10.54857/6p8bqj06","title":"Mapping the research trend and international collaboration of IIT Delhi","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information and Knowledge Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New delhi; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6850340464915459,"score_gpt":0.6392744208791217,"score_spread":0.04575962561242419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407111140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90014666,0.018428683,0.0012609863,0.0054508825,0.00029112835,0.00014629531,0.017783746,0.00022943862,0.056262158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97062457,0.014987238,0.001928375,0.00029194905,0.00015643443,0.00016255566,0.0076963534,0.000063283755,0.0040891827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959934,0.00048173487,0.0007774455,0.00076432875,0.0013939873,0.0005890426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839812,0.004961408,0.005836921,0.0007775202,0.0032509365,0.0011919106],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020282886,0.0003333522,0.0005155494,0.019404085,0.0012069886,0.006303746,0.0010349891,0.00061211694,0.0038201134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011508139,0.00024653965,0.0006059388,0.0558296,0.0006416769,0.0032706528,0.0024248625,0.00079176994,0.001305552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020970649,0.0000999472,0.8269866,0.0038746232,0.00023921157,0.0031554871,0.014989429,0.0006187127,0.0020344749,0.007936993,0.017352194,0.12250259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091743805,0.000104473846,0.89535,0.0011574517,0.0002262958,0.00286706,0.02821199,0.00055527483,0.0014883043,0.0009643219,0.069001965,0.000063868996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011927524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014492986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029509345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006677896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023716152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407186206","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.1430","title":"Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Kempestiftelserna; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.2965073675035227,"score_gpt":0.5119618618658536,"score_spread":0.21545449436233088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407186206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93747324,0.002021381,0.0017564583,0.013371418,0.00021276224,0.00007591772,0.0010495571,0.000042167867,0.043997068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997463,0.00038255806,0.00035852764,0.00049942394,0.00009049546,0.000028406927,0.00028561396,0.000012754744,0.0008792418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684607,0.015038519,0.0038941756,0.0015151814,0.008699556,0.0023918056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85558677,0.080287166,0.029860964,0.012126724,0.014868164,0.0072702393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025950572,0.00016193211,0.0008171051,0.0075157573,0.0019987377,0.0058334284,0.0010456234,0.0009803893,0.008081367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19427502,0.0002148267,0.00033618786,0.017455254,0.0029882225,0.007463596,0.004235047,0.0011057941,0.0006908564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024664422,0.00018531406,0.6443541,0.0007152596,0.00025289398,0.00027735013,0.026495524,0.0007710301,0.0004974775,0.037450466,0.023326594,0.26542744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022805925,0.00006430673,0.91044074,0.00058635854,0.00010211271,0.00027792528,0.0332496,0.0010064256,0.00030810205,0.017094335,0.036786504,0.000060762173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007539477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010769667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030651123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033158108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13724136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407358242","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111719","title":"Cochrane reviews’ authorship has become more gender-diverse but remains geographically concentrated: a meta-research study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bruyère; University of Ottawa; McMaster University; Impact; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Cochrane collaboration; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Geography; Medicine; Library science; Genealogy; History; Political science; Cochrane Library; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.970973840257367,"score_gpt":0.7733534434701769,"score_spread":0.19762039678719012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407358242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07184623,0.9223084,0.0016823012,0.0010538487,0.00041048258,0.00031168523,0.0010979993,0.000033467626,0.0012555772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82628757,0.165772,0.0031713464,0.0020119343,0.00072227675,0.00064938946,0.0009828594,0.00008774871,0.00031481523],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92134637,0.038989104,0.021233557,0.009101303,0.007654548,0.0016750551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6624798,0.23933132,0.06449453,0.016950045,0.014480558,0.002263758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057090055,0.0014923732,0.0068346695,0.019944372,0.001074963,0.0060365885,0.0023784924,0.0023751515,0.0035616457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21504946,0.0013308446,0.019932607,0.026920384,0.001578646,0.0054410785,0.0032837975,0.0017416243,0.0004520217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002861748,0.000090265436,0.34525207,0.15944791,0.44365156,0.0007020034,0.0024971133,0.0004504242,0.00033794175,0.0009568695,0.0015091042,0.042243045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094490394,0.00089975976,0.29608646,0.09142446,0.5911886,0.0029334275,0.0039847083,0.00067185704,0.00047446485,0.0021117656,0.009113188,0.00016642804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006721741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013115524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98005563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029000111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035448105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3019247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407567707","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88709-7","title":"Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Server; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.4510459083690589,"score_gpt":0.543189825935932,"score_spread":0.09214391756687312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407567707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8142974,0.00786043,0.035789687,0.009042964,0.00090585434,0.000643253,0.019904068,0.0056429366,0.10591339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592271,0.0016471903,0.013835959,0.0009401827,0.00095067406,0.00027156394,0.008039359,0.0006931865,0.014394821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665081,0.009385122,0.003138326,0.0032837396,0.016053295,0.0016314621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7640987,0.11677552,0.052033544,0.0420417,0.022150626,0.002899927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021006424,0.00094352174,0.0014530959,0.014376131,0.002783935,0.011969396,0.0025660233,0.0020304671,0.0088200085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17822753,0.0007742292,0.0007843778,0.03027749,0.002144559,0.010161228,0.003916224,0.0023364795,0.006298924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010086619,0.0005317138,0.49745366,0.0016817527,0.0006741046,0.0007261708,0.005097688,0.0039895657,0.004850342,0.05293615,0.07009596,0.36095423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025893628,0.00056056154,0.442892,0.0012564794,0.000822551,0.0027947766,0.004204156,0.058270544,0.03576601,0.13509679,0.31763354,0.00044362302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037179622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045993202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026116401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022037127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11109388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407641680","doi":"10.54932/goth7434","title":"L’effet du coût des études supérieures sur les choix de filières stratégiques, scientifiques et mathématiques au Québec et au Canada","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3870720134191277,"score_gpt":0.5021308695992517,"score_spread":0.11505885618012396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407641680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734547,0.001967491,0.0013060824,0.00351616,0.000059838196,0.00007990491,0.002768805,0.00008534288,0.016761532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892697,0.0004412495,0.00033923396,0.00024177648,0.00002350214,0.00002951846,0.0005200233,0.000018763682,0.009116333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993356,0.0021413139,0.00022209971,0.00093174994,0.0017131262,0.0016356377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96155846,0.016675996,0.0048058457,0.0017817838,0.00947836,0.0056995554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062180473,0.0003811747,0.00076267903,0.0022594493,0.0023989219,0.003223163,0.0011350136,0.00087762845,0.01023105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025805883,0.00028665666,0.0007718932,0.0048006224,0.002121402,0.0010836693,0.0019770411,0.0013767516,0.00050063094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011928638,0.00012391587,0.9171584,0.00023526272,0.0010172683,0.00014171815,0.0047218553,0.0048317756,0.0016657977,0.009246819,0.0042813895,0.05538294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048899168,0.00013124915,0.98566574,0.000074363066,0.0001875092,0.000015977956,0.0024823467,0.0017458363,0.00056562753,0.0006874846,0.00837142,0.000023553703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9700244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030124389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036645982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21856874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407652817","doi":"10.1144/esss2024-013","title":"Research students are diverse, while those in salaried positions are not: results from a survey of Canadian academic geoscience","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth Science Systems and Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Mississauga","keywords":"Earth science; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Data science; Engineering; Psychology; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6487163512115388,"score_gpt":0.578458086968049,"score_spread":0.0702582642434898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407652817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905751,0.00051413756,0.000082239414,0.0010884744,0.000013769246,0.00009586469,0.0031044676,0.00000890333,0.004517052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961308,0.0009991653,0.0001719053,0.00040104764,0.0000072012203,0.00004414809,0.0012231548,0.0000067439214,0.0010157586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974935,0.00017579294,0.00014785756,0.00026433676,0.0012500295,0.0006686002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366343,0.00040514884,0.00094187265,0.00014069554,0.0029648321,0.0018841773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021186762,0.00036191478,0.00039089328,0.0030353016,0.0054999758,0.0021586234,0.0018826984,0.0005734731,0.0030350275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007049739,0.00034400015,0.00052649464,0.009765374,0.0015442962,0.0008130927,0.002214759,0.0008806168,0.00052343355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009036823,0.00009565016,0.957272,0.00026844433,0.00002899171,0.00017963265,0.022037609,0.00006527858,0.0003753508,0.00023870285,0.0033194164,0.016028658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050587482,0.000034787787,0.97213984,0.0000807212,0.000013282613,0.000049669652,0.025308462,0.00009791879,0.00007816898,0.000033709406,0.0021396682,0.000018784815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99254906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99531543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99788135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022019826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046593115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15976578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407778781","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091666","title":"Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Arthritis Research Centre of Canada; Research Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Qualitative research; Peer review; Health services research; Public health; Medical education; Family medicine; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.8962373543290585,"score_gpt":0.7766862850356947,"score_spread":0.11955106929336379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407778781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95695937,0.002340857,0.010702063,0.01775373,0.00034057826,0.0012647671,0.0002946208,0.00007788575,0.010266145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019367,0.0015330977,0.0023112807,0.0026515762,0.00007712355,0.0008728465,0.000066034874,0.000051344112,0.0022430294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8529807,0.123424135,0.0044922433,0.0032005461,0.010315451,0.0055868444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68917286,0.2598885,0.016456755,0.0038948476,0.019316552,0.01127047],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09867085,0.00056809484,0.0014637205,0.0027580238,0.014311668,0.008560666,0.0030682525,0.003810888,0.0030857818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21365726,0.0009035325,0.00055582816,0.003205398,0.015726551,0.008326359,0.012175852,0.0056305453,0.0006074613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042440322,0.000047635098,0.0041194563,0.00041811666,0.000008636471,0.0008584447,0.9854394,0.00005916891,0.0003704778,0.0022608326,0.0009846985,0.0053907083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081224225,0.00005966828,0.0012059292,0.0003952657,0.0000061994597,0.00034759074,0.98006034,0.00018463256,0.00021880145,0.0011707087,0.016321357,0.000021443004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058181635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005026651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90132916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012120397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018770242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5218276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407867924","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8909","title":"Reflections on Co-Production as a Mode of Knowledge Production; Comment on \"Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact\"","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coproduction; Knowledge production; Production (economics); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.6570034211964689,"score_gpt":0.7343118395520892,"score_spread":0.0773084183556203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407867924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009501162,0.0020334558,0.0003263554,0.77719635,0.21894123,0.000023810966,0.00004677325,0.000064565,0.0012724642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028180357,0.0018919272,0.0006822464,0.6303611,0.35850483,0.0001200535,0.000024010904,0.000119059485,0.0054788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655735,0.009652106,0.0033343367,0.0039088586,0.01555005,0.0019811154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8473163,0.10819969,0.0052106488,0.0030585732,0.030666139,0.005548617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034383267,0.0024303705,0.0027752684,0.0032049608,0.00995544,0.0139130335,0.0112121785,0.054523908,0.0045268955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14137852,0.0013281475,0.0030691207,0.0025440303,0.016207516,0.013259357,0.0047252686,0.053803246,0.004432778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013162206,0.000006270513,0.000028602484,0.0000833718,0.0000067592787,0.00010308238,0.00025454466,0.000020561201,0.000033955635,0.00207238,0.9959837,0.0013935152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006115822,0.000026248943,0.000268832,0.0005069424,0.00004448774,0.00024707575,0.0007295126,0.000337501,0.0002986895,0.01104987,0.98636776,0.000061901024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014676157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021144714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99004453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009284815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013278904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18183827},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4407884387","doi":"10.1038/s41562-025-02125-5","title":"How institutions can better support international early-career researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.648656325410493,"score_gpt":0.5813698532562874,"score_spread":0.06728647215420558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407884387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003314852,0.00024622638,0.0000901742,0.9925391,0.004422088,0.000004701924,0.000015249874,0.000010640322,0.0023403175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007119651,0.00024211187,0.00019470476,0.9764748,0.009260474,0.000025544385,0.000017472132,0.000018375991,0.0066468604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754165,0.0075300974,0.0018641533,0.0019972094,0.007351511,0.00584053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8391353,0.089575365,0.0083432505,0.0057138894,0.018871604,0.038360644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031250097,0.00067992357,0.0013576212,0.0017612106,0.0097661065,0.0217105,0.0028215179,0.121058956,0.0155792795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17670462,0.00091903115,0.001332845,0.0017120627,0.010386418,0.015125285,0.0084253615,0.05818466,0.011139837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007070279,0.00007005717,0.0016013995,0.00005527226,0.00003210407,0.0005752102,0.00040269335,0.000083007435,0.00019689625,0.02386609,0.9612427,0.01180404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002778681,0.00006573738,0.0029872337,0.00030380703,0.000054598237,0.0005035491,0.0023990704,0.0008839902,0.0005778854,0.09326163,0.8985279,0.00015666327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013722249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032325264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00905262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02570284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1652683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407918365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5152665","title":"The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.3310630732154118,"score_gpt":0.5286070715078648,"score_spread":0.197543998292453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407918365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7705128,0.020550719,0.12706603,0.01801414,0.00039770125,0.00021895964,0.0018483074,0.00054080784,0.060850527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919972,0.0011886483,0.003956699,0.0003273748,0.00027959206,0.000058721886,0.00021490369,0.00008726036,0.0018896915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643415,0.02219733,0.001506302,0.004137619,0.006350372,0.0014668615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6695984,0.28422534,0.016372716,0.020962266,0.007329509,0.0015118367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03183141,0.0004016619,0.0014735564,0.01014877,0.0013955986,0.0077715917,0.0016429394,0.0027040425,0.0032646132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18094653,0.00074876007,0.0009787654,0.01134997,0.004458635,0.0055659115,0.0033752024,0.001729091,0.00063257053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041240267,0.00015959676,0.263943,0.00062035007,0.0014757914,0.0008275867,0.008803933,0.012644189,0.0014437154,0.54349756,0.00795838,0.15821348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007518106,0.0000709742,0.20463605,0.0003488592,0.0004662828,0.00062506873,0.0041703912,0.027225295,0.0018380188,0.74395734,0.016469821,0.00011672387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023820105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027397391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98985124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028138196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013215044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16834259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408202934","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2776","title":"Impact of a Fulbright award: A bibliometric analysis of persistence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health SA Gesondheid","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Library science; Humanities; Psychology; Art; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5185590538425793,"score_gpt":0.6212961476712524,"score_spread":0.10273709382867313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408202934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717808,0.060000267,0.004501112,0.004206716,0.00029537248,0.0012685567,0.035751443,0.0004075965,0.021788204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96324986,0.016690511,0.004881703,0.00017802524,0.0003559067,0.0009259044,0.012575209,0.00008516553,0.0010578457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97470224,0.0039556366,0.007032269,0.0021155758,0.011268361,0.0009259903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7667289,0.15011379,0.04481504,0.0066902,0.02884853,0.0028036558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028160138,0.00063905225,0.002553277,0.15389484,0.0018548259,0.00904365,0.0018700626,0.0012601693,0.003616259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15865798,0.00034425914,0.0029282449,0.17711571,0.0019424518,0.006366457,0.0052988203,0.0009516417,0.0007311539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045491665,0.00015700702,0.78159034,0.023709586,0.0033659905,0.0010090639,0.010848936,0.0014547125,0.0009676354,0.0042567416,0.0091772815,0.16300789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007864581,0.0003878961,0.8959905,0.0078342,0.004062814,0.0024555638,0.020554772,0.003660238,0.0013778681,0.0076018255,0.055763766,0.0002319003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039750612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034197664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97183985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003313876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005151178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14892685},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4408263149","doi":"10.29173/pathfinder108","title":"Beware of Predatory Publishers!","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Predatory pricing; Economics","score_opus":0.3442162620506865,"score_gpt":0.5494086683825756,"score_spread":0.20519240633188912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408263149","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045450497,0.03603888,0.016135875,0.5877916,0.013197824,0.0004419853,0.0006109008,0.0017863263,0.29854614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45665818,0.04713542,0.030898018,0.1400097,0.0075366166,0.00037980246,0.0008916876,0.0010235161,0.3154671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802684,0.0064360285,0.0010404687,0.0014596179,0.00903282,0.0017625899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93242717,0.025675917,0.00973204,0.00827754,0.015564041,0.008323254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01104058,0.0009017689,0.00086087117,0.004013258,0.016431283,0.032219872,0.002168152,0.00786507,0.023295559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06215836,0.0007590772,0.00079163525,0.00501531,0.010703786,0.029227674,0.008502749,0.0069322544,0.012478977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017289136,0.00015977812,0.02365031,0.0020142007,0.00013137625,0.0034190633,0.056757603,0.00015081666,0.0019567008,0.14353675,0.43437567,0.33367485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136568715,0.000066660585,0.003438818,0.0010953546,0.00005874591,0.0016968445,0.024660576,0.00011355883,0.0010891308,0.023881571,0.94380206,0.00008289116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018429881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047142464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014274349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077931404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408386221","doi":"10.1002/asi.24989","title":"What's in a name? Scholarly journal title changes and the quest for international visibility (1965–2020)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Internationalization; Visibility; Impact factor; Scopus; Political science; Library science; Scientometrics; Order (exchange); Scholarly communication; History; Media studies; Publishing; Social science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12346288512074194,"score_gpt":0.4928377733759304,"score_spread":0.36937488825518844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408386221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9051461,0.027282903,0.0013197738,0.022088563,0.0015244281,0.000025533687,0.0016961746,0.000059370654,0.040857174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328583,0.0030389135,0.00040686197,0.0003733394,0.000735002,0.000008433166,0.00034386796,0.000020981011,0.001786848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663925,0.00079097715,0.00043586153,0.00044581704,0.0013048596,0.0003831469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94446915,0.013048124,0.026627196,0.0014698758,0.008732869,0.0056527127],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070788586,0.00014255985,0.00036412338,0.0059206258,0.00097069755,0.009001565,0.00048243636,0.0008446493,0.0038170642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042476583,0.000117496274,0.00025804577,0.0109156845,0.0018296167,0.0057076123,0.0021134063,0.0009868324,0.0008816398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062170863,0.00024397398,0.68210477,0.000980698,0.00018143926,0.0010027809,0.020714227,0.0006464824,0.0024321678,0.04023654,0.020311719,0.23052345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003166475,0.00020881284,0.8218776,0.0008060059,0.00011607629,0.0010941256,0.019773379,0.0007456057,0.0020783308,0.0077754897,0.14543061,0.00006224776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003265982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003229576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99407935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019689766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03743702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399694","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0023","title":"They Rejected My Paper: Why?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.4707725526660492,"score_gpt":0.5219823587712209,"score_spread":0.051209806105171674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03492456,0.014087145,0.007114515,0.8592756,0.06440406,0.00019948366,0.00022033749,0.00015519839,0.019619191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35103104,0.027986316,0.015268439,0.50072175,0.05325789,0.0004144914,0.00052541855,0.0006551292,0.050139423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565109,0.018241527,0.00378671,0.0034774463,0.01537997,0.0026036226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85026765,0.066481106,0.020507721,0.0053749885,0.044658795,0.012709683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0396089,0.0006291764,0.0011081299,0.0020147562,0.0051255524,0.013079479,0.0027367626,0.008008065,0.012562831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30412346,0.00045471516,0.0014251962,0.0016324422,0.0059538707,0.00799213,0.0038251323,0.011548588,0.007795611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048552718,0.00021803711,0.04087968,0.0017767928,0.000647078,0.010664189,0.025998129,0.00024849913,0.0020220694,0.041215025,0.5853955,0.2904495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013846983,0.00032119942,0.009395282,0.005536932,0.00034527777,0.019706508,0.061954096,0.00058197766,0.002099608,0.052625902,0.84698063,0.0003140618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091903907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018178411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031792433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077558197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20947438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408410518","doi":"10.3390/educsci15030358","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of Romanian Educational Research in Web of Science: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Integration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Computer science; Data science; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Educational research; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Political science; MEDLINE; Psychology","score_opus":0.8196150404099736,"score_gpt":0.6613525713258969,"score_spread":0.1582624690840767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408410518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89152807,0.041437402,0.004594564,0.0028304572,0.00020761584,0.00017520963,0.014182557,0.00021964163,0.04482443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97655267,0.011001083,0.003610902,0.000108059256,0.0001915512,0.00010863531,0.0070692366,0.000043180706,0.001314713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918656,0.0018526623,0.0017263237,0.00077410607,0.0033200842,0.00046130246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743025,0.011383428,0.0059417607,0.0017125804,0.006085549,0.00057418994],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008786834,0.0003503205,0.0011531059,0.08748722,0.0011205021,0.0050033005,0.0004806277,0.0003877357,0.001948944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035841186,0.00015919717,0.00080493954,0.14811297,0.0009530255,0.0026686075,0.0020287104,0.00040021256,0.000568399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121325254,0.000058553138,0.71173567,0.0027978653,0.00057350757,0.0005633235,0.0036798923,0.0016390271,0.0014200974,0.009949578,0.0072689163,0.26019222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008401433,0.00005662761,0.9478713,0.0007118291,0.00019235503,0.0006098263,0.0035838305,0.002665828,0.0008519036,0.0017167445,0.041695435,0.000035943554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003996294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037185221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002398752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034818621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046469748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408462321","doi":"10.33763/npndfi2024.04.092","title":"Theoretical basics of grant financing: concepts, components and typology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naukovi pratsi NDFI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Business; Management science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.3931078182717049,"score_gpt":0.5693303446408561,"score_spread":0.1762225263691512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408462321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14834999,0.010370537,0.38484237,0.040111654,0.0007848735,0.001612266,0.0006631262,0.00032183953,0.4129433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256865,0.0034244552,0.057810143,0.00084568554,0.00023138881,0.0025676338,0.00027406993,0.000084166786,0.009076045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762172,0.015024109,0.0015970431,0.0015702738,0.004186478,0.0014049797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702406,0.020456526,0.0031571905,0.0026840202,0.0024202277,0.001041472],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019721976,0.0007232578,0.0008385425,0.01237286,0.0049232324,0.015490756,0.0030833299,0.0031767224,0.0055903834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035791833,0.0005393506,0.00077205506,0.013531003,0.040739432,0.020338204,0.0071980534,0.0025862467,0.00055391283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004003757,0.000009731176,0.00075566076,0.000057404388,0.000002614925,0.000036973528,0.004256914,0.00022691884,0.00002400422,0.989869,0.00033669456,0.004420207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010805634,0.000023309807,0.0009052578,0.00042475297,0.0000072847806,0.00016777475,0.010992481,0.0013473285,0.00008939534,0.93904865,0.046966285,0.000016702259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002347833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010534809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011893771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009008084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104300976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408662333","doi":"10.63485/ehewr-d9m21","title":"U. Montréal opens its theses","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.7542654528242381,"score_gpt":0.6089285065486577,"score_spread":0.14533694627558036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408662333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028023135,0.003336343,0.0005837895,0.02092368,0.028644836,0.00011929248,0.017169788,0.0029304363,0.9260116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013265803,0.0010360128,0.00020069494,0.0012067604,0.0020512294,0.000033135686,0.0028368132,0.00079269987,0.990516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662614,0.0002570576,0.00009917762,0.00043616164,0.0021093974,0.00047199216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940492,0.0004942772,0.0002152501,0.0008642829,0.0025761276,0.0018010401],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019580408,0.0011587174,0.0014399106,0.004288463,0.00456274,0.012457805,0.0019054435,0.0028449392,0.799434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00989498,0.00049134233,0.0010663585,0.0050093886,0.0012440592,0.0038815388,0.0044822316,0.0032009038,0.62574285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007817913,0.000004499445,0.000032098375,0.000028861787,0.0000013439545,0.00003115624,0.000021560356,0.000008912462,0.000024175646,0.0027228214,0.9873411,0.009775631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014101412,0.0000010949186,0.000055551896,0.000019233665,3.8379397e-7,0.000006139632,0.000016900221,0.000004620545,0.000009115055,0.00021544678,0.99966836,0.000001704599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05743966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122053795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99809456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059338165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008450032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28608304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408745160","doi":"10.63485/qdgdv-ntk76","title":"More on removing price and permission barriers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5993575303160726,"score_gpt":0.5899067655527499,"score_spread":0.009450764763322739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408745160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002139657,0.006593764,0.004877996,0.82802826,0.008164573,0.000044615375,0.0007573826,0.0002242909,0.14916946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094381,0.011261394,0.008029444,0.562758,0.011409333,0.00020143067,0.0010553503,0.0010662361,0.30983773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888775,0.0033657595,0.00048405226,0.0012774544,0.00420333,0.0017919434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634364,0.021366905,0.0012231102,0.003442653,0.008362819,0.0021680656],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010467599,0.0007601981,0.0011633298,0.0025709756,0.005210065,0.008700352,0.0022500802,0.01165746,0.15951708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07566519,0.00043019545,0.0014028016,0.0033265704,0.0059771533,0.027192734,0.0040581925,0.010825544,0.019844782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038779453,0.00007818215,0.0005404703,0.00017555774,0.00003071425,0.00010217278,0.0009977483,0.000150439,0.00028060042,0.24665737,0.7247818,0.026166158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053158623,0.000027431151,0.0015683187,0.0004127495,0.00003142095,0.000046823956,0.0014354028,0.00018607025,0.0004800039,0.09781904,0.89788353,0.000056094406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033889912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04700025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005463012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076019755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53363776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408767301","doi":"10.63485/r37yc-0e563","title":"OA publishing, with a focus on British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Focus (optics); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.5017725558512895,"score_gpt":0.5057943518032549,"score_spread":0.00402179595196539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408767301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02361893,0.18777218,0.00047842084,0.20530836,0.013498881,0.00008798822,0.010369341,0.00044947467,0.5584164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064590454,0.068019144,0.00065358554,0.015666468,0.0014318407,0.000049713697,0.0031071897,0.00022918802,0.8462525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828076,0.000064044536,0.00007966079,0.00025062542,0.0008518774,0.00047313483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927045,0.0006740916,0.0003149436,0.00020468436,0.0042246743,0.0018770904],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010142452,0.00064235175,0.0005769418,0.006506741,0.0074691786,0.012889889,0.0009458051,0.002404869,0.047172368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042008096,0.00032807843,0.00025694346,0.020336915,0.0013627328,0.003420509,0.001794048,0.0023827052,0.007967221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007254803,0.000020594402,0.0027885821,0.0004167645,0.000013418923,0.00038328586,0.00078218686,0.000066161454,0.00046431823,0.0151929995,0.8981988,0.081600375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005290516,0.0000044136686,0.011844139,0.00024649268,0.00000821147,0.00008717684,0.0008537577,0.000033196695,0.0001031611,0.0007372261,0.98606247,0.000014578066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87138605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9756124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03005232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049493566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25874275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408844348","doi":"10.63485/r6x49-hrg46","title":"Canadian funding agency launches an OA repository","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Business; Funding Agency; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.7355679784450803,"score_gpt":0.5987643766690417,"score_spread":0.13680360177603856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408844348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012491005,0.004803158,0.047438566,0.09336011,0.019159291,0.0066784015,0.048873905,0.054898836,0.7122967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036686532,0.0030221378,0.11559518,0.011385622,0.0033136832,0.001546268,0.05134088,0.011942737,0.76516706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9290974,0.0038989342,0.0033700254,0.0034362245,0.052251235,0.007946263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6164785,0.013440227,0.007281942,0.05064884,0.23987661,0.07227386],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05465689,0.0015116372,0.001993608,0.021139385,0.015793068,0.02981403,0.0077110766,0.007564343,0.07999096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09566364,0.0019577092,0.0028324246,0.021992732,0.005220804,0.013185786,0.011717828,0.007136786,0.04710961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016301364,0.00017416924,0.0024319487,0.0001943076,0.000041510142,0.00020688337,0.0006814197,0.00019000859,0.0014380671,0.030678486,0.875738,0.088062234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059649134,0.000039696748,0.0014610278,0.00008033921,0.000012225693,0.000041350155,0.00021991594,0.0002280694,0.0004713063,0.0011231002,0.9962106,0.00005269302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7499041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7686417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99228895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036993366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28164262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50313747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409093390","doi":"10.2196/72998","title":"Citation Accuracy Challenges Posed by Large Language Models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Natural language processing; Library science","score_opus":0.32946776814999285,"score_gpt":0.60707918867813,"score_spread":0.2776114205281372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409093390","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11799384,0.020983713,0.70076734,0.118686974,0.002669349,0.00033074207,0.010821169,0.007234644,0.020512238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85689914,0.005245142,0.11441989,0.005576847,0.0037689484,0.00051120925,0.0060514053,0.00093443826,0.0065929634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572923,0.02806689,0.0028587494,0.0042392835,0.006814923,0.000727847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5586054,0.41044027,0.0052161175,0.013153372,0.011511976,0.0010728791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06631449,0.0013625064,0.0038350804,0.0046814224,0.0031590057,0.012396172,0.0049665817,0.0040222183,0.0031216936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27483797,0.0016090223,0.0018428664,0.007911995,0.002809564,0.017381746,0.004224836,0.006109092,0.0033011592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086507254,0.0005546593,0.035131264,0.0023104236,0.0024922597,0.0008468851,0.0019752302,0.21333136,0.0022556912,0.17964637,0.09527184,0.46531895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075040654,0.000044685745,0.0026641393,0.00019742562,0.00023700023,0.00030956205,0.00047831915,0.6551521,0.0011247391,0.32868192,0.010975476,0.000059614726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011407466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014947093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037606445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004137038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35070872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409117945","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2488948","title":"Response to “Frontiers in bibliometric analysis: the overrepresentation of bibliometric analyses in grey publisher journals”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Grey literature; Library science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.7187109624252355,"score_gpt":0.6964715231902021,"score_spread":0.022239439235033354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409117945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034462393,0.0006369648,0.0001453526,0.9570351,0.041062064,0.00001914915,0.00027796178,0.00008695771,0.00039185176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002314574,0.000743619,0.00024244447,0.9618499,0.032410562,0.00005758374,0.00012496478,0.000055798344,0.0022003914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918799,0.0018884159,0.0015970661,0.00088815927,0.0028961662,0.000850242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9288196,0.03446596,0.006592135,0.0012996049,0.023204425,0.0056183212],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009897895,0.0011919735,0.0017684663,0.0019989507,0.0033538071,0.0048890044,0.0027168945,0.030774953,0.011717716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10360072,0.0008584437,0.0018252468,0.0027471401,0.003074389,0.0034975787,0.003388986,0.030162062,0.009790147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046433808,0.000009895421,0.0003809241,0.000084877145,0.000015444413,0.00020923879,0.00011760863,0.000023804394,0.00012796099,0.00028462635,0.99595994,0.0027392474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270778,0.00012054707,0.005265124,0.0008511377,0.000077246346,0.0015805942,0.0015355072,0.00048728305,0.00096645835,0.0022527743,0.9865442,0.00019214085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059855822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054011205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005059415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057714074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052345753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409158554","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05296-0","title":"Examining the role of co-first authorship in scientific collaboration: a quantitative study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Sociology; Data science; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6419803795842838,"score_gpt":0.6109582313954125,"score_spread":0.03102214818887128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409158554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98821545,0.00097084185,0.001805176,0.00062248943,0.00004095173,0.000106040134,0.0004804971,0.0000135757255,0.007744919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980914,0.00018075664,0.0009374443,0.000030874988,0.00004162584,0.00008432075,0.00012896542,0.0000057456064,0.0004987302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9609129,0.02213052,0.0038962069,0.00206822,0.009554455,0.0014377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44632742,0.44014746,0.06082474,0.009709211,0.029810408,0.013180703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02901873,0.00031033967,0.00083182653,0.010533896,0.0030364548,0.0054853633,0.0013140424,0.0014312316,0.0038070178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17808601,0.00020975685,0.0008468598,0.017067948,0.0020500636,0.0059689065,0.004850551,0.0013337675,0.00053256325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031371161,0.00049916934,0.93174994,0.00069949374,0.00025739736,0.00028465842,0.031044342,0.00034741868,0.0008956812,0.0023444814,0.0005143126,0.031049471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006586394,0.0005979639,0.9072884,0.0003824076,0.00026976698,0.0011039991,0.07713509,0.0022629907,0.0011264919,0.005035911,0.004659022,0.00007220809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016592235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023716493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98946613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019246773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005497697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15346754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409213925","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2025.2485795","title":"Dynamic analysis of the time-dependent progress of h-index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2568807318774551,"score_gpt":0.5561487956127815,"score_spread":0.29926806373532644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409213925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74862266,0.0011459982,0.230971,0.0025118592,0.00008785676,0.00011320628,0.0014063331,0.00045808725,0.014683088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98741,0.0003140278,0.008560875,0.00005653986,0.000023728047,0.00004389861,0.0003470307,0.00004970978,0.0031941761],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987393,0.00031025137,0.000059596216,0.00033755714,0.00033200026,0.00022123958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97156703,0.01952461,0.0040427074,0.0018070693,0.0024544965,0.00060411886],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004730407,0.00042514678,0.0007090076,0.0023576005,0.00056243804,0.0017792543,0.0011771686,0.0011005722,0.0024237633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039206248,0.00047346356,0.0006716311,0.0021842988,0.0012980254,0.0032695606,0.001056015,0.0016092529,0.0005331671],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025880078,0.00014129792,0.0431584,0.00018808979,0.000115110066,0.00066707825,0.0008602723,0.7187952,0.008887234,0.19037358,0.0033522127,0.033202697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010845827,0.00005570378,0.010134753,0.000020258263,0.000020487567,0.0001655035,0.00013846837,0.95949394,0.002015617,0.025866704,0.00202862,0.000049062448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029334102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027337733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014692212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025017083},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4409399271","doi":"10.1007/s42535-025-01251-9","title":"Comparative study of trends in photosynthetic metabolism knowledge between Brazil and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vegetos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Photosynthesis; Biology; Veterinary medicine; Botany; Medicine","score_opus":0.40615825487403984,"score_gpt":0.5747577964994507,"score_spread":0.16859954162541085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409399271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877244,0.0019149744,0.00021397989,0.00055670337,0.000010804762,0.000008778681,0.001826343,0.000011644557,0.0077324165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984915,0.00058316044,0.00013969193,0.000025157944,0.000005091638,0.000002709652,0.00046784492,0.00000205577,0.0002826463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995807,0.000072458584,0.000054860106,0.00009261807,0.00014291918,0.00005654469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629897,0.0013240286,0.0010483186,0.00017165873,0.00093639543,0.00022059947],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085590035,0.00010900954,0.00027708255,0.005642326,0.00042277903,0.0010452957,0.0002743495,0.00020837864,0.0010949757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063251564,0.000088886525,0.00024755462,0.010009898,0.00043430892,0.00063610636,0.0006808294,0.00018932472,0.00008958079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057303783,0.000030701973,0.9529266,0.00016860501,0.00011350868,0.000114121074,0.003556141,0.0001558182,0.00076846057,0.002225877,0.00057177927,0.039311152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012015929,0.000013588753,0.99416566,0.000045570978,0.00004181677,0.000054684395,0.0026045868,0.00022307454,0.0001295284,0.0001472686,0.0025694766,0.0000034706168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11292423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19106717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99435765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013635656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020925226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22453386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409428864","doi":"10.1177/23780231251328714","title":"From Funding Equity Initiatives to Research Productivity: Quantifying the Impact of NSF ADVANCE Awards on Recipients’ Publication Trajectories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Productivity; Political science; Economics; Regional science; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.8732843629579464,"score_gpt":0.7383037569837724,"score_spread":0.13498060597417405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409428864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799008,0.0018289163,0.005794264,0.002054999,0.00010025414,0.00013014521,0.0020445273,0.00006731444,0.008078874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953496,0.00044572147,0.0016550536,0.00013012715,0.00006125109,0.00014197761,0.0009894677,0.000023024317,0.0012038854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826147,0.007274126,0.0022185824,0.0016567861,0.0048971116,0.0013386803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8043207,0.105727054,0.052098505,0.013666278,0.015152025,0.009035374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033631306,0.00042013123,0.00061129517,0.006055567,0.0015656897,0.0065461486,0.0010136594,0.0009459863,0.0036844958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16877384,0.000279335,0.0010269289,0.011451175,0.001150054,0.0050822115,0.0053958544,0.0015210145,0.0011759754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003009003,0.00023754283,0.91700935,0.00016438145,0.00028115016,0.00005589449,0.0023791057,0.0014399487,0.0002986641,0.0026306761,0.0009253996,0.07427694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002862248,0.00048615056,0.9769403,0.0001792818,0.00018788518,0.00013348681,0.0035799365,0.0032073364,0.0010748801,0.0074760225,0.006655469,0.000050507442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040570805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004775839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002252532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038049226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17786151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409573174","doi":"10.63485/js7m1-67p26","title":"Canadian funding alliance provides OA to the research it funds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.855765589726267,"score_gpt":0.6476407285586211,"score_spread":0.20812486116764595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409573174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010200023,0.0065740994,0.0021634847,0.18344885,0.012023402,0.00046233882,0.021080276,0.0021414703,0.77108604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018172985,0.0074907877,0.009570585,0.029359927,0.0018806952,0.00046839687,0.012910948,0.001638025,0.91850775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94985,0.0023739657,0.0022198835,0.002927076,0.035817843,0.006811162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86987543,0.008573306,0.002437866,0.010331271,0.084958225,0.023823949],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019009875,0.0012981045,0.001662545,0.007903678,0.015464767,0.020252462,0.0032503726,0.007694537,0.1801349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08960168,0.0013299146,0.0016774957,0.014428141,0.0032768985,0.006541744,0.006536165,0.007007361,0.07090238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022166383,0.0000057198504,0.00023348986,0.00007493987,0.0000074239874,0.000028465975,0.00012710142,0.00002824189,0.00008699961,0.030917617,0.95314044,0.015327368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008573968,0.0000023095392,0.0003916889,0.000058166974,0.0000064515675,0.000011837336,0.00006279125,0.000027960608,0.00005205642,0.000988279,0.998376,0.000013753594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9113597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94790626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99674964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08211033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3036059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409600482","doi":"10.63485/zh50g-pzr25","title":"Michael Geist calls on Canadian government to mandate OA to publicly-funded research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Geist; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7236919819231086,"score_gpt":0.6122221483126473,"score_spread":0.11146983361046126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409600482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018354912,0.008011116,0.0010805816,0.8069334,0.024899287,0.00032862506,0.0015958936,0.0008903918,0.15442519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025409317,0.009234297,0.005886347,0.46381623,0.005983185,0.0004297036,0.0018574166,0.0007126781,0.48667085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95238465,0.0034050657,0.0015308417,0.0020704977,0.03275574,0.0078530675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8710243,0.025282364,0.003911278,0.0086470675,0.06663952,0.024495456],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029468864,0.0010293336,0.0017164726,0.0072616427,0.022218015,0.018637959,0.005281374,0.024697246,0.04564465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10212119,0.0012818328,0.0021025233,0.012035513,0.010707428,0.009915181,0.009075212,0.017107071,0.014335819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002390099,0.000019447014,0.0003452364,0.00007710237,0.000010168882,0.000102562204,0.0003156368,0.00004148154,0.00019010143,0.019788163,0.9663126,0.01277356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014785302,0.000009273449,0.0009707643,0.00009066135,0.000008336052,0.00002384199,0.00029531124,0.000031632953,0.0001261969,0.0017337603,0.9966647,0.00003053852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90279394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.938924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07697486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.253281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5584943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409618730","doi":"10.63485/vnghy-msg64","title":"Public support for OA journals in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8677978172402238,"score_gpt":0.6266668301252222,"score_spread":0.24113098711500158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409618730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08531919,0.0160005,0.0003996151,0.37212887,0.003947879,0.0002003696,0.015517673,0.0006020919,0.5058838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6955185,0.011791651,0.0009806535,0.043840807,0.002577933,0.00012788418,0.0076782075,0.00030857892,0.2371758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.977716,0.0010720768,0.00067392114,0.00095202477,0.013637393,0.005948623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86163574,0.014434457,0.008133588,0.0029967818,0.069750436,0.043049037],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075597307,0.00042357715,0.0008439726,0.01145839,0.011768638,0.020059887,0.0027939568,0.0036492795,0.055495992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060055017,0.00050843024,0.00071115745,0.01986214,0.0041475967,0.003495409,0.006232041,0.0032561803,0.0033154008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002557161,0.00012602864,0.033711303,0.0005318147,0.00011254174,0.0006754141,0.0038144651,0.00038836288,0.0004289211,0.07639012,0.79193974,0.091625616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014848064,0.00004566367,0.15417254,0.0005746035,0.00006853647,0.00020063351,0.007222576,0.000605825,0.0003110245,0.0056352946,0.83088595,0.00012881338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97560436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99720603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09881297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29749447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7169416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409636982","doi":"10.63485/ta5sg-hrm45","title":"CISTI considers OA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.8537970487704313,"score_gpt":0.6650593612996738,"score_spread":0.18873768747075748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409636982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001381721,0.011559347,0.0023710697,0.099770136,0.0038153413,0.000043933913,0.00036917804,0.000080950296,0.8806083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19451079,0.03204984,0.006209001,0.10235385,0.019157426,0.00025332902,0.0015450577,0.00053137506,0.64338934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97721374,0.0029487817,0.0010781643,0.0029151777,0.011380639,0.00446353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96977365,0.006891476,0.001156889,0.002936308,0.013437073,0.0058046323],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01182894,0.00074259704,0.00086914544,0.004492592,0.010432546,0.028524468,0.0026352908,0.009010822,0.040991567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02901108,0.00045180222,0.0010079348,0.008352227,0.015672406,0.012611041,0.006105633,0.01063748,0.008340849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010060914,0.0000054750813,0.00016144029,0.00004059237,0.0000035835849,0.000050486575,0.00026563776,0.00010448559,0.00003240905,0.9178158,0.07138399,0.010126095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005923553,0.000009472764,0.0002992755,0.0001971591,0.0000066364437,0.00009685015,0.00041178748,0.000120367135,0.00005869303,0.088495165,0.91028404,0.000014536996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25470188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22706924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03500994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05990838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50643873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409656814","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/y569z_v1","title":"Investigating journal peer review as scientific object of study: unabridged version – Part II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Preprint; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7596824354113867,"score_gpt":0.6267780326723678,"score_spread":0.13290440273901893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409656814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045362175,0.19379021,0.058798198,0.35020947,0.112472266,0.0014146359,0.0011317001,0.00037775427,0.23644371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6311776,0.11211645,0.03941208,0.07508024,0.082073,0.0045621973,0.0018498083,0.001375361,0.05235326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95469165,0.022482984,0.0032798094,0.004967122,0.013370543,0.0012079175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7493886,0.17719585,0.016219899,0.02284736,0.031112771,0.0032354647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04662154,0.00074077275,0.0013082324,0.005333369,0.005708123,0.029400302,0.0030148418,0.0053847106,0.013912745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21669857,0.0007287772,0.0010846597,0.0069756727,0.030330721,0.016620355,0.0092891585,0.0075099766,0.00433559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007702694,0.000108939326,0.003628239,0.002996299,0.00006217188,0.00008535576,0.019163268,0.00023390901,0.0004871713,0.83918893,0.05038104,0.083587624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046930283,0.00019382287,0.010997393,0.015698282,0.00012111348,0.00046990946,0.013345965,0.0012811912,0.0010285558,0.3081635,0.6485336,0.00011974231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018651542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99466664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069056884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010803401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24656123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409669833","doi":"10.63485/7e4vb-kvz05","title":"For this journal, OA increases submissions, quality, and impact factor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Quality (philosophy); Factor (programming language); Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8529167592658652,"score_gpt":0.6948283942763875,"score_spread":0.15808836498947765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409669833","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018560247,0.15322238,0.008393517,0.24913539,0.44301867,0.00037993712,0.0049534715,0.0027905789,0.11954579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12909074,0.15324745,0.01767672,0.033944253,0.47900108,0.00027602457,0.003952077,0.002468021,0.18034354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96515286,0.0065957503,0.0040689474,0.0026357137,0.019777903,0.0017688216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.756058,0.08150798,0.029954685,0.0074286587,0.10436074,0.020689934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02563736,0.001026125,0.0022779135,0.011911003,0.0034947114,0.027823072,0.0016656274,0.0030949544,0.091897234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17154571,0.00069481414,0.001674338,0.015899668,0.0020525693,0.012947111,0.0033491962,0.004674615,0.027976722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003438345,0.00020561276,0.0049458127,0.0035375098,0.00022404738,0.000121147925,0.0004559413,0.000125799,0.0016290991,0.0075990106,0.7501751,0.23063712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002146522,0.0004094407,0.034916554,0.00095282006,0.00050136977,0.00097389764,0.0009120714,0.00071663695,0.0021655168,0.010518476,0.94756854,0.00015011372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003942522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011754877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045086024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01405672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30742687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409678250","doi":"10.63485/3skzc-yna41","title":"Canadian strategy for research and scholarly communication","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.9262295703845984,"score_gpt":0.7044177162853287,"score_spread":0.22181185409926973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409678250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013080743,0.06330483,0.0018755739,0.24987559,0.01016473,0.00042852975,0.03774159,0.0010892611,0.63421184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024853239,0.04976852,0.007701825,0.016453186,0.0009932633,0.00045618857,0.0088692615,0.00048447086,0.89042014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98431325,0.0005927393,0.00056685886,0.00092657754,0.011540295,0.0020601808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97089404,0.0014804936,0.0006914123,0.0012642505,0.021856137,0.0038136905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055755535,0.0014151705,0.0012762911,0.0104601,0.010348634,0.01235939,0.0024016108,0.0060694856,0.062982515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018559042,0.000810852,0.00091124646,0.019047495,0.0026322685,0.005111013,0.003363787,0.0059755268,0.019423911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022996232,0.0000076276106,0.00020262746,0.00016735069,0.000010225754,0.000035899557,0.00013935722,0.000056868204,0.00007476996,0.06580346,0.90868825,0.024790658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049978657,0.000002107702,0.0010619726,0.000094577146,0.000006872125,0.000011012983,0.00011770933,0.00003936119,0.000046132933,0.0017123579,0.99688977,0.000013192246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99442446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105345145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35385832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7643361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409728141","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22390","title":"Towards Sustainable and Coordinated Methods for Estimating Open Access Costs at Canadian Higher Education Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental economics; Higher education; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.354533325933165,"score_gpt":0.5916812547562789,"score_spread":0.23714792882311386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409728141","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055011228,0.0024853358,0.9018214,0.009883357,0.00017213586,0.001496038,0.003417935,0.0008138947,0.024898725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25261045,0.0014274197,0.7379248,0.0005870543,0.0000868944,0.0011708156,0.0024744482,0.00027220603,0.0034459787],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95341474,0.022344442,0.0022830726,0.0029419558,0.016307129,0.0027086353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89875704,0.037101675,0.009522378,0.007855239,0.044987768,0.0017759674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04022233,0.0018546758,0.0024058588,0.01566106,0.004060434,0.014139007,0.005184216,0.0020398991,0.0023364194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15284787,0.0014733571,0.002175085,0.023175163,0.0038360513,0.005491154,0.0079807695,0.0034221136,0.0005324475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010410527,0.00018331756,0.094386466,0.00094857026,0.00092303567,0.00020028854,0.003853268,0.3614076,0.00068989256,0.18863729,0.01900266,0.3296635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098800214,0.000074149044,0.087283865,0.0010921851,0.0002840391,0.00010644694,0.00600778,0.6834066,0.0016928834,0.17274621,0.046901785,0.00030523224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93024796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.922458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99481577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068950176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11152254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50027084},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4409733993","doi":"10.63485/b43hh-rtn68","title":"OA to Canadian social science and humanities research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Digital humanities; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.9027202693128655,"score_gpt":0.6846050831972839,"score_spread":0.21811518611558167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409733993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078168913,0.010847965,0.0008168066,0.059915602,0.012934517,0.00026747384,0.017462235,0.00075345277,0.89622015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010587756,0.00756649,0.0016273598,0.0070470227,0.0010203954,0.00014642376,0.0067446493,0.0003090853,0.96495074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023926,0.0005094196,0.00053103705,0.001035521,0.0058542294,0.0018305114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95430195,0.0025170525,0.000843998,0.0033701097,0.03223159,0.006735256],"candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00605629,0.0009817193,0.0015845046,0.012674307,0.012517223,0.01573463,0.002496628,0.003997815,0.38284463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030239502,0.00074802694,0.0010021448,0.016898278,0.0037467573,0.0034806365,0.004883188,0.0032838678,0.107140616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001684326,0.000010974844,0.00046774655,0.0001678194,0.000009681259,0.00006215835,0.00019837705,0.000029357441,0.000076714634,0.027972948,0.93565434,0.03533293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000284097,0.0000016123205,0.00086677016,0.000092587085,0.0000050383023,0.00001478765,0.00013716251,0.000029917459,0.000026941936,0.001213258,0.99760276,0.0000063929756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9123404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95219064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0613043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20683919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88029724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409741111","doi":"10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i2.2616","title":"Nobel Prize in Economics: retrospectove analysis and prediction of laureates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Gestão & Tecnologia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; University of California, Santa Barbara; Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University; Toulouse School of Economics; London School of Economics and Political Science; Northwestern University; York University; University of Pennsylvania; Universitetet i Oslo; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Yale University","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics","score_opus":0.37584639152506316,"score_gpt":0.49309913823988977,"score_spread":0.1172527467148266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409741111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461746,0.006931933,0.005787706,0.0020901437,0.00062780414,0.00006371682,0.008375338,0.000107558684,0.029841159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885124,0.0017726006,0.0009089231,0.00004811324,0.0002826106,0.000037395985,0.0035673701,0.000028956578,0.0048416527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736804,0.00057574204,0.00032924616,0.00030775607,0.0010900187,0.00032923202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664275,0.013801388,0.009623613,0.0016017206,0.0058949837,0.0026507296],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007312837,0.00034929405,0.00044472064,0.007299491,0.0006741517,0.0022608184,0.0004653823,0.00041805577,0.002965838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04144882,0.00013322475,0.0004450224,0.008211981,0.0005212322,0.0016455397,0.0011611754,0.0008643636,0.0020374204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005572334,0.000088179324,0.8944744,0.00022993574,0.00014043819,0.00024104714,0.0010879668,0.003906642,0.00020600735,0.00819075,0.013128073,0.07774941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017708348,0.00020251542,0.9339271,0.00018677158,0.00008180935,0.00028911588,0.0018747846,0.007009076,0.0006517868,0.00853061,0.04716109,0.00006768535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043999017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054593966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094788044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009525443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038674414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409755532","doi":"10.63485/ecj3v-69f70","title":"Canadian funder discriminates against OA journals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.7604873810842887,"score_gpt":0.6139564019016527,"score_spread":0.14653097918263602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409755532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22062874,0.013958281,0.0008199468,0.06612406,0.0015749292,0.00021533568,0.006015863,0.00030826943,0.6903546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9224713,0.0048075896,0.00059953943,0.0076759337,0.00057898596,0.000043958444,0.0015684011,0.000105616695,0.062148653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732519,0.001210711,0.0008763811,0.0013435544,0.018147016,0.0051704296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8836725,0.02130344,0.014085783,0.0045174174,0.059648823,0.016772041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010576445,0.00044245168,0.0011667312,0.015468738,0.00740382,0.012682265,0.0016956636,0.0025875375,0.019985197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0970185,0.00037679318,0.0005871452,0.016246468,0.0025036668,0.002735931,0.003149443,0.0013316681,0.0019028002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094773096,0.00008155355,0.22848392,0.0010194797,0.0004694985,0.0008215898,0.009670703,0.00041129725,0.0031490356,0.15638424,0.4185845,0.17997652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002186185,0.00010525975,0.33956477,0.0008243559,0.00052771205,0.000575799,0.0070955167,0.0009901634,0.0020021775,0.015442211,0.63244015,0.00021328706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90113974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9301163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037644878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071535215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409912679","doi":"10.1098/rsos.240857","title":"Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Openness to experience; Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Ethos; Equity (law); Political science; Public policy; Science policy; Open science; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.3359765003308867,"score_gpt":0.6180077266880395,"score_spread":0.2820312263571528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409912679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7774813,0.015895542,0.007344299,0.10853348,0.0005970665,0.00066207326,0.0005705377,0.000069797454,0.088845946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882587,0.0023762286,0.0023544752,0.0045687417,0.00008160223,0.00034307447,0.00014029934,0.00003998752,0.0018369007],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84474796,0.09671168,0.013629964,0.0066674883,0.029292418,0.008950431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40435034,0.5074502,0.03777361,0.014685904,0.02780356,0.007936353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20476945,0.00037287845,0.0012615547,0.015527823,0.01664358,0.03163588,0.0025075676,0.007758392,0.0027454777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30818978,0.0007791147,0.0005675299,0.026062561,0.035340324,0.019908533,0.019727381,0.007979882,0.00030092717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015359395,0.00017738136,0.019104768,0.0019496122,0.000055525645,0.0009238226,0.6358451,0.000603462,0.00115268,0.2821359,0.0045948783,0.05330321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004681587,0.000089067245,0.023930976,0.0033907031,0.0000395948,0.0002979525,0.75656176,0.00043458585,0.0009853905,0.03172818,0.1823864,0.000108627406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021008905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014734649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99749243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041195836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048379574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4410024879","doi":"10.55016/pbgrc.v1i1.81424","title":"Publication Chair’s Editorial - Insights and Innovations: An Array of Scholarly Advancements Emerging from the University of Calgary","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peer Beyond Graduate Research Conference","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5282680111901159,"score_gpt":0.5368554082654491,"score_spread":0.00858739707533318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410024879","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014231424,0.0146141825,0.00055494695,0.19652654,0.7749899,0.000052097577,0.00028920546,0.00018031771,0.011369683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025371162,0.032084867,0.0030427978,0.088967524,0.7097945,0.00008772049,0.0006554619,0.00073530024,0.13926059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98630214,0.0015294373,0.00071836985,0.0010999448,0.008991938,0.0013582031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93202466,0.0085785845,0.0029191754,0.0013090118,0.04190486,0.013263716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016390013,0.0009931187,0.00095966144,0.0043585543,0.004093054,0.0122506935,0.001300366,0.003800293,0.021128869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04286179,0.00046612948,0.0007723255,0.0038513972,0.0019042278,0.0033369672,0.002736558,0.008461614,0.0073772524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003245586,0.000010302767,0.00021727053,0.00013652862,0.0000061987416,0.00008718137,0.00016973348,0.000028423096,0.00026515874,0.00073999853,0.98269826,0.015608451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012133051,0.000026062804,0.0015731531,0.00030371998,0.000012687106,0.000108966415,0.0005534331,0.00007041281,0.00027289856,0.0005969663,0.99644816,0.000021370948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008719664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048877403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016012985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0866797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410043481","doi":"10.1080/1941126x.2025.2497727","title":"Are most FT50 journals truly “suspected predatory”, or has an AI-driven “predatory” journal detector erred in its classification?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ecology; Data science; Biology","score_opus":0.520105489641718,"score_gpt":0.5217428154380026,"score_spread":0.0016373257962846166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410043481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720837,0.0012609814,0.0032262101,0.006295573,0.00041459268,0.00015511097,0.00262283,0.00019576232,0.013745328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933416,0.00035835552,0.0026341495,0.00081803097,0.00025943486,0.00005066664,0.0010522363,0.000034354704,0.0014511503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860838,0.0023077473,0.002301702,0.0014009161,0.0066624316,0.0012433821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.825995,0.050575767,0.06861399,0.009652545,0.038549308,0.006613397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018430587,0.00030089877,0.0007297192,0.011161704,0.0020837886,0.0047131344,0.0012074577,0.0013533701,0.0025164017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13077277,0.00031591512,0.000553783,0.008616126,0.0021183456,0.0032406822,0.0015257753,0.00079763506,0.0023761392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004475763,0.000055158776,0.9327075,0.00020745893,0.000098867036,0.00027290982,0.0020613167,0.00011528276,0.0017606937,0.0011360832,0.0046091634,0.056528054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040486546,0.00020966769,0.96775293,0.00017080246,0.00013244375,0.0009590333,0.0053860885,0.0019081333,0.0036195784,0.0022643765,0.017478684,0.00007771752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013135134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016389491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020000574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027389445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097471416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410122176","doi":"10.1629/uksg.677","title":"Barriers and benefits of transitioning to an equitable open access model: interviews with LIS journal editors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open access journal; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5755927797252935,"score_gpt":0.5852753503797516,"score_spread":0.0096825706544581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410122176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885245,0.00056664087,0.0015133296,0.005188418,0.000092163355,0.00013327316,0.000025937155,0.00001327544,0.0039425525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947161,0.00057183264,0.0009807775,0.0013923862,0.00004592645,0.00016007846,0.000016022163,0.000012652642,0.0021042558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97476315,0.019460974,0.0010269627,0.00074970355,0.0017407888,0.0022583622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002424,0.08096894,0.005668316,0.0009849652,0.0052030026,0.0069324756],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029285643,0.00035759003,0.00070188876,0.001123564,0.0065889605,0.0072695706,0.0012546082,0.0023905546,0.0017986172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08340344,0.0007574019,0.00031725946,0.0011267869,0.006281024,0.0056011006,0.004325259,0.0043225,0.0002653904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006247115,0.00007910797,0.004703347,0.00011305043,0.0000051573115,0.001040235,0.98769534,0.000062621824,0.0006079494,0.00096243963,0.00050601084,0.0041622305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009389347,0.00006237085,0.0013748053,0.00009458256,0.000005973448,0.00018539731,0.99006724,0.00014171348,0.00027346273,0.00036751686,0.0074005267,0.000017125963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003676224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043504154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003782894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051396186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410500507","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162577.1","title":"“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Openness to experience; Open science; Scope (computer science); Incentive; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Equity (law); Political science; Public relations; Open data; Publishing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Psychology; Economics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7318407363937084,"score_gpt":0.617907542556378,"score_spread":0.11393319383733036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410500507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090401985,0.030645125,0.004726014,0.83071595,0.0032964684,0.000050131235,0.0001444772,0.000039436894,0.03998049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91345656,0.018872496,0.0026783543,0.057151932,0.0027312154,0.00009620871,0.00014043601,0.00013856233,0.004734247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8998104,0.074233696,0.0031767022,0.0051537054,0.013324172,0.004301465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77045137,0.19006798,0.011355782,0.006820549,0.013345622,0.007958767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1226618,0.00034931753,0.001078566,0.0055213757,0.014813496,0.04327773,0.002456476,0.009952141,0.0032662395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19434631,0.0005377962,0.0008129726,0.010601899,0.065849274,0.040333126,0.012854395,0.014359257,0.0006713594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018247252,0.000056329376,0.0045870203,0.0011163001,0.00006862574,0.0004450005,0.20490444,0.0003655714,0.0004139629,0.69347477,0.030772438,0.06361309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048547918,0.00007323487,0.0074345428,0.0033875932,0.000042553133,0.00027355805,0.21225893,0.0005750456,0.00070341595,0.24534163,0.5297158,0.00014518827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011046585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00993239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024344414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029218253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64870536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410609573","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0313972","title":"Canadian natural science graduate stipends lie below the poverty line","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan; Ocean Networks Canada Society; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Stipend; Poverty; Graduate education; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.6116825791435256,"score_gpt":0.5139824557776801,"score_spread":0.09770012336584555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410609573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55327916,0.0014058946,0.0052429643,0.017023157,0.00035189843,0.00039550257,0.1591935,0.0006751967,0.26243275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90501976,0.0014507322,0.0048310584,0.0026534789,0.000059315902,0.00031809483,0.04657315,0.0001867675,0.03890778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960594,0.00020629518,0.00010655402,0.00032111202,0.002114226,0.001192472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923653,0.0005778539,0.0007309085,0.00034244693,0.004398112,0.0015853798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015881932,0.00029057387,0.00052475213,0.0028335103,0.0051256157,0.0028055443,0.0008637774,0.00036401476,0.02251601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009977473,0.00025629363,0.000385026,0.0075907675,0.000947059,0.00069891673,0.0020743476,0.0009863244,0.00214406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016138704,0.000102454105,0.49579027,0.00045268115,0.00015325773,0.00023724577,0.006157682,0.0010341727,0.00080442464,0.022827968,0.32646593,0.1458125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016471542,0.000027203305,0.79281557,0.00024013118,0.000025174426,0.00007281975,0.0071568065,0.0007068147,0.00044094282,0.002538891,0.19589458,0.00006457806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97051394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98944116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99841183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017120562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046554048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12421894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.8238363909286305,"score_gpt":0.67728162911672,"score_spread":0.14655476181191052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410612411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87634635,0.00202838,0.077870406,0.013749682,0.0009666243,0.00251007,0.0015563397,0.00022242959,0.024749689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896259,0.000075219796,0.0063809333,0.0012893864,0.0001309529,0.0010787046,0.0001248986,0.000025521636,0.0012685827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.49268484,0.4556498,0.008986243,0.018071657,0.01804296,0.006564474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28147236,0.5964705,0.055244755,0.052584592,0.010898451,0.003329384],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3550921,0.00055339094,0.0023165916,0.0014546708,0.003653606,0.0044361125,0.0032474971,0.0041699847,0.009734674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55534226,0.0006793866,0.0017539606,0.0021440634,0.009801284,0.005308236,0.0066097453,0.0035140407,0.0011691588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038519807,0.0041941013,0.43668258,0.0027806563,0.005080744,0.0021275966,0.0316339,0.0066469708,0.0037120613,0.3145083,0.023768239,0.13034502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008987158,0.011490176,0.43267724,0.0023148223,0.003613857,0.0013735164,0.021003239,0.052678257,0.01238758,0.3972973,0.055368654,0.00080818974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070226574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065279645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99854535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029981423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79528624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410818492","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1","title":"The pivot penalty in research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"University College London; Georgetown University; Northwestern University; Brigham Young University; National Science Foundation; Yale University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Productivity; Point (geometry); Computer science; Data science; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7627360321146428,"score_gpt":0.7272791267903327,"score_spread":0.03545690532431012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410818492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3542617,0.04288889,0.34135085,0.07632112,0.0038770207,0.0019266815,0.0053054453,0.0016288026,0.1724395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96333706,0.002573162,0.023145009,0.0046700467,0.0006734093,0.00088639796,0.0007511041,0.00023722788,0.003726629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.85643554,0.06482471,0.014598554,0.024041343,0.03337798,0.0067219245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49260753,0.32267672,0.089090705,0.057734568,0.022304548,0.015585919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09877823,0.0011114893,0.003035195,0.008409812,0.007958945,0.016573489,0.003453906,0.006724945,0.01237723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41914648,0.0015179211,0.001307421,0.016523488,0.025800329,0.021757146,0.019404326,0.007402741,0.0032259186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013172927,0.00016005922,0.18699771,0.0024789716,0.0004755464,0.0006868988,0.01064682,0.012036157,0.0008917763,0.6061518,0.017148424,0.16100855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014829513,0.00035087587,0.057208434,0.0014514165,0.000113142276,0.0006102972,0.004120162,0.008310509,0.000742494,0.8687804,0.057947796,0.0002162269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004299576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003856807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008691633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118421065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5223955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410824289","doi":"10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i2.79811","title":"Multi-dimensional research impact assessment through bibliometrics, altmetrics, semantometrics, and webometrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Webometrics; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6336736663487719,"score_gpt":0.6536435045868374,"score_spread":0.01996983823806553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410824289","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17018524,0.021634009,0.6285384,0.015609291,0.001087724,0.0021394668,0.012059691,0.003140476,0.1456057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66211116,0.0078663,0.31898734,0.00059556076,0.00078353775,0.0022530975,0.0043479465,0.00030773366,0.0027472847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91240156,0.039768048,0.010635767,0.0030043465,0.033258874,0.0009314174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8257514,0.10300231,0.027514637,0.01449876,0.027326928,0.0019059995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06713505,0.0017442411,0.002014368,0.12124727,0.0024101646,0.019161085,0.0016045826,0.0010680223,0.002654511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16974103,0.0005937574,0.0014566401,0.13393486,0.0041981395,0.013831416,0.007950384,0.0016828809,0.00078039727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013080263,0.00020074399,0.087556124,0.0056715403,0.0013525452,0.00018965105,0.0072608767,0.010676569,0.0024821258,0.2639267,0.010910886,0.60964143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064337495,0.00037455026,0.14969358,0.0045479354,0.00073917775,0.0007675077,0.024246775,0.060758416,0.0071221306,0.5883859,0.16272357,0.0005761511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003152374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042679287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93286496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060560005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006821767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3550483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410907320","doi":"10.1080/14459795.2025.2508460","title":"A framework for independent research using industry funding: the Massachusetts model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Gambling Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Business; Operations research; Regional science; Management; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9351945172701203,"score_gpt":0.7403965404133352,"score_spread":0.19479797685678502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410907320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006143187,0.0069876816,0.6003308,0.19917314,0.0015372739,0.002961345,0.00055587635,0.00026879067,0.18204187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45729822,0.00845852,0.42197374,0.04635879,0.0042268788,0.027271211,0.00040207498,0.00025569633,0.03375491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.59645087,0.33976617,0.009603593,0.01553044,0.03229343,0.0063553588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6004718,0.32194096,0.016200798,0.026261214,0.027389681,0.0077354563],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3522376,0.0015480001,0.0025423623,0.007781081,0.0068775476,0.02332526,0.008048713,0.015019036,0.00902447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28833598,0.0016904402,0.002476035,0.00939638,0.037991315,0.021909319,0.014697293,0.011617691,0.0028890357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011131598,0.000009309264,0.00013727657,0.00005983818,0.000014524641,0.000025447698,0.00046019314,0.00036849186,0.000015671296,0.9948775,0.001669598,0.0023509949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012508564,0.00005594421,0.00024213243,0.00046239156,0.000029315646,0.00006095111,0.00027765043,0.0015887007,0.00006131,0.9424697,0.05459555,0.000031233976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009982024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007530373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98498094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020690542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06330202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79880637},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4411039083","doi":"10.1002/pan3.70057","title":"Navigating the editorial and publishing process at <i>People and Nature</i>: Advice for (and requests to) authors and reviewers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"People and Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09287082460303388,"score_gpt":0.5234968734046008,"score_spread":0.43062604880156696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411039083","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001851899,0.016949797,0.017605707,0.45032758,0.47480854,0.0026201166,0.0009787258,0.0079100225,0.026947567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020524638,0.023630923,0.11105839,0.29103285,0.44191307,0.005728028,0.0015594743,0.009718596,0.094834045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84938914,0.05271525,0.028925244,0.007997845,0.055889864,0.0050827023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26471335,0.15099743,0.05926245,0.030272387,0.43061477,0.0641396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14718306,0.0025991944,0.0036270719,0.009156219,0.011239976,0.03733943,0.006085385,0.017778583,0.053400055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4960324,0.0028559677,0.0027304564,0.0061638835,0.009065774,0.026353199,0.008576447,0.019890774,0.103825554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006106045,0.00003561818,0.0004552054,0.00053342246,0.000026877808,0.00036597383,0.0025181312,0.00005344903,0.0005991347,0.0009060237,0.9580514,0.03639362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051084928,0.000054600165,0.00050672155,0.0012008245,0.000033231896,0.00051583763,0.002644235,0.00015619797,0.00035994343,0.0048918934,0.98946244,0.00012296735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032763365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01265141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85281694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008893797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046904586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7783877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411292408","doi":"10.1002/bes2.70026","title":"The <scp>ESA</scp> Editorial Fellowship: Navigating the Publishing Landscape as Early‐Career Scientists From the Global South","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0986299942945382,"score_gpt":0.4136103137856787,"score_spread":0.31498031949114047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411292408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02144495,0.01417724,0.0026954655,0.77073866,0.10003982,0.00013471385,0.00021051265,0.00054678804,0.09001184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29689997,0.029758936,0.012780529,0.2798005,0.08502568,0.00035007604,0.0005802719,0.002827619,0.29197648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98559594,0.005313702,0.00072696526,0.0013085713,0.005076084,0.0019787592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88325596,0.015505371,0.0074065016,0.004846013,0.023034537,0.06595155],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027744116,0.00051179255,0.00066606945,0.0021070412,0.013137175,0.023839511,0.0023318955,0.0069790594,0.033703614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06896516,0.0004379865,0.0005721879,0.0026579786,0.011038935,0.014926956,0.015355497,0.008646254,0.010038385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000770561,0.00005872135,0.0031737185,0.0005265302,0.000015368336,0.0014217468,0.017463012,0.00008022706,0.0013903361,0.022360735,0.8470388,0.10639376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067357782,0.000033307067,0.0015285377,0.0002801327,0.0000038897206,0.000515262,0.008155393,0.00005308934,0.00013539332,0.0050840448,0.9841859,0.00001831528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027830708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012192645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97616047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041907937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027499842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14672667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411466289","doi":"10.1177/03400352251351113","title":"Open access publishing in an African context: Notable improvements and recurring challenges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFLA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Context (archaeology); Electronic publishing; Descriptive statistics; Kenya; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.7889256432296887,"score_gpt":0.6569215348505064,"score_spread":0.1320041083791823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411466289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3432049,0.15719926,0.0061933924,0.44059443,0.0047065266,0.00017404908,0.00037805957,0.000110418834,0.047439042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8967549,0.079496846,0.00853364,0.008259472,0.0022288966,0.00007419781,0.00013068327,0.000045240693,0.004476099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98630893,0.0062730056,0.0014515667,0.0009727697,0.0034139468,0.0015796418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92954624,0.04151812,0.009415937,0.0034672676,0.009876296,0.006176227],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02005927,0.00037479936,0.00066446315,0.0034237143,0.0052977046,0.012373484,0.0013658402,0.0022930892,0.004500586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048771672,0.0003049716,0.00041940415,0.010882692,0.005471586,0.014834833,0.0053075836,0.0028927415,0.0006296143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023635403,0.00030624954,0.06447934,0.009016763,0.000111071095,0.0059951744,0.06717342,0.00055315817,0.0033478874,0.095128216,0.022350647,0.7313017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375748,0.00034793455,0.10057415,0.009453492,0.00014560351,0.006297449,0.21879824,0.001162339,0.002533362,0.067133404,0.59331846,0.00019194698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004645602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074043493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99863416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003130153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01785546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10608482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411622207","doi":"10.1038/d41586-025-01926-y","title":"What incentives do companies need to publish research?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publication; Business; Accounting; Economics; Advertising","score_opus":0.520772851748931,"score_gpt":0.6429454551108235,"score_spread":0.1221726033618925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411622207","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13053858,0.018333731,0.009828095,0.6140291,0.0050332127,0.00042102963,0.0015365708,0.00047876136,0.21980079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338671,0.005444694,0.004991522,0.035614815,0.004178037,0.000392058,0.00045569305,0.00011616887,0.014939861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96690685,0.016858134,0.0024180508,0.0014823478,0.0088208625,0.0035138584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63863426,0.17990549,0.08122029,0.010683315,0.037287813,0.052268807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036466487,0.00045314833,0.0011113829,0.0029188541,0.0022735775,0.014087721,0.0016565669,0.007473008,0.01864196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18732914,0.00064668077,0.0005700117,0.0027432996,0.0046892166,0.012937731,0.0028823335,0.0029709267,0.0045398814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017163863,0.0012295035,0.11323379,0.0062266127,0.00049478427,0.0008531448,0.003496316,0.0028056698,0.003959743,0.29330534,0.20298468,0.36969405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010832425,0.000969867,0.15286697,0.0034060976,0.00032817217,0.0010741886,0.008025387,0.0032124904,0.003066273,0.34210202,0.4835078,0.00035743695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020487665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003035068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007435911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011049299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19285554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411687368","doi":"","title":"Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Consortium For Research and Innovation In Aerospace In Quebec","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Scholarly communication; Oligopoly; Scopus; Impact factor; Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7949869484321319,"score_gpt":0.6946953970868245,"score_spread":0.10029155134530743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411687368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43973532,0.0017639948,0.05115136,0.056877818,0.00054408656,0.00012869007,0.0005755362,0.00044900287,0.44877413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896673,0.0002610558,0.0020853765,0.0010043125,0.00017764351,0.00002878316,0.000059772025,0.00011455906,0.006601161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234515,0.0030316925,0.0002930482,0.0013319127,0.0017156267,0.001282625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374409,0.032546557,0.0058558173,0.011197547,0.005313783,0.007645406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010560529,0.0003101403,0.00089013134,0.0027629605,0.005672524,0.022962185,0.0024123783,0.0033191848,0.028864985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07046885,0.000642237,0.0006753422,0.004474661,0.01505543,0.022362795,0.010016856,0.0032611007,0.0033663565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024427945,0.00013258602,0.009709851,0.00010589316,0.00006922591,0.00027254564,0.005541134,0.002415937,0.0009943137,0.9322342,0.009671497,0.038608667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007972113,0.000043327425,0.003512006,0.000097656346,0.000043004147,0.00012965637,0.0048544593,0.0045955624,0.0006277798,0.9496744,0.036293797,0.000048549322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061209654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008503159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004556721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008173525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09656298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411730359","doi":"10.1177/10497315251352828","title":"A Guest Editorial: Turning Your Research into a Best-Seller—An Innovative Approach to Knowledge Mobilization and Becoming Newsworthy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Research on Social Work Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7254687325639142,"score_gpt":0.6904742155733132,"score_spread":0.034994516990600966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411730359","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024695493,0.0016388393,0.00011435144,0.04994084,0.94750804,0.000015696363,0.000027270977,0.00003265708,0.0006976108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002722814,0.0012259718,0.000093252296,0.019382587,0.9751179,0.00002041182,0.000014581702,0.000032945318,0.003840093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595226,0.0031165248,0.0016282715,0.0015646894,0.006829784,0.0009083276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93179786,0.03141864,0.0038702206,0.0018495274,0.020294411,0.010769284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01640448,0.004176451,0.0050058556,0.0061365766,0.0069894204,0.016315965,0.0056221527,0.034260895,0.019144488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06761289,0.0018825666,0.004199128,0.0026180982,0.004288798,0.0070080752,0.0038381421,0.029884964,0.0124271605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002263024,0.00000911986,0.00001985745,0.00009058149,0.000014027026,0.0001030611,0.000014307846,0.00001171318,0.00003431904,0.00021663592,0.9974234,0.0020404153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012246867,0.00003876401,0.0003352601,0.00070741866,0.00010066171,0.0004399839,0.00013501546,0.00028021118,0.00013958072,0.002096601,0.9955609,0.000043065436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021141334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007961551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005702451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006421181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08675623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412064833","doi":"10.59350/bibliomagician.2966","title":"Citation issues resulting from Canada's new RDM mandate – a tipping point for Open Science? Guest post by Jeffrey Demaine","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RDM; Tipping point (physics); Mandate; Citation; Open science; Point (geometry); Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.48570016698192575,"score_gpt":0.565686237185776,"score_spread":0.07998607020385029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412064833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035613116,0.0042666057,0.00039118834,0.9297337,0.010406407,0.000021263339,0.00043931723,0.00013945671,0.05104071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16077235,0.01221752,0.0031596473,0.5312352,0.013230253,0.000082095816,0.0009280287,0.00066673924,0.27770817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97251666,0.0015926439,0.0008472035,0.0013283524,0.019225497,0.004489599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90852267,0.019838952,0.0019160513,0.002894542,0.049104266,0.017723588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016609697,0.0004543105,0.0010021992,0.0033881036,0.02997083,0.028014299,0.0033960622,0.014124712,0.025125794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08697524,0.0005704508,0.00079107645,0.005447807,0.011657285,0.007076871,0.0062691956,0.017066486,0.006189373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024865245,0.000013467295,0.0007549488,0.00004599145,0.000006895268,0.000188234,0.0014416663,0.000067550915,0.00018298648,0.0581427,0.9254381,0.013692565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013485129,0.0000096106605,0.0026831788,0.00015527752,0.000008749003,0.00006137846,0.002580971,0.00016908778,0.00033909938,0.010420297,0.98348063,0.000078318946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8919272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9515487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99660397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084865116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1948902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6157424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412159529","doi":"10.1097/paf.0000000000001061","title":"Trends in Publication Outcomes of Platform Presentations at National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) Annual Meetings From 2013 to 2022","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scripting language; Presentation (obstetrics); Publication; Library science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Peer review; World Wide Web; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Surgery","score_opus":0.17258907904906207,"score_gpt":0.5250327767110547,"score_spread":0.3524436976619927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412159529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84237427,0.04683598,0.0013957745,0.011767845,0.0012198882,0.00011909689,0.0764884,0.0009102135,0.01888854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539698,0.0147623,0.0012038231,0.0006331313,0.0014070463,0.00016989147,0.023350285,0.00014200732,0.00436177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928725,0.0014107955,0.0016783043,0.0009013041,0.0024693038,0.00066766323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.902718,0.027743462,0.041831195,0.0022804535,0.019970726,0.0054562166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862002,0.00040064793,0.0005791434,0.021580793,0.00054660486,0.003129983,0.00082015555,0.0005835145,0.0045187925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054302942,0.00018437431,0.0008419589,0.024929946,0.00041188128,0.0026916657,0.0016206669,0.0007807219,0.0013874335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007100259,0.00010517613,0.8161574,0.0029145062,0.0007181153,0.0005916656,0.0018048133,0.00073968794,0.001491416,0.0013348165,0.04403892,0.12939335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003488794,0.00015437075,0.96198905,0.0008081148,0.00026565595,0.0012636347,0.0020788673,0.00070588413,0.0010767822,0.00051365036,0.031059055,0.000050075425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002922912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013927208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018448005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04157871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412187308","doi":"10.1177/09610006251353385","title":"Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Precarity; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.640031349098399,"score_gpt":0.557906649263912,"score_spread":0.082124699834487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412187308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966354,0.0013022588,0.0025238001,0.011814884,0.00005236167,0.00012621155,0.00004614991,0.000011243909,0.017768992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983083,0.0002596167,0.00061957847,0.0004079581,0.000012007874,0.00003373262,0.000012107664,0.000006601066,0.00034016842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9414093,0.030519884,0.0042600175,0.0029558074,0.015038311,0.005816607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8820249,0.08259591,0.01368895,0.0043173553,0.009838514,0.0075344318],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046505485,0.00026117737,0.00087452686,0.0043663583,0.013566367,0.011946105,0.0023670155,0.0015276704,0.0029249666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10560568,0.00040526365,0.00053372566,0.005922804,0.023353191,0.008883052,0.016475732,0.0032232963,0.00012289165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004503625,0.00010838062,0.10880095,0.00046029722,0.000054105127,0.0005345908,0.812911,0.00017109906,0.00033963614,0.036592137,0.000628454,0.039354343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010852272,0.000060915834,0.05874267,0.0008220258,0.000041223295,0.0003868807,0.90369797,0.0006643589,0.00030288813,0.023062106,0.012154624,0.00005348659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10335706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1335619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019019514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051600177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24594742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412196964","doi":"10.59350/pkp.8828","title":"Canadian Student Journal Forum and PKP's Open Journal Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8211044885345252,"score_gpt":0.6649789251546205,"score_spread":0.15612556337990469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412196964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0171287,0.0059146537,0.009916154,0.09952656,0.0044385735,0.00065483793,0.007802843,0.002757649,0.8518601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5754736,0.0075303963,0.035311986,0.00921964,0.0026127272,0.00072144245,0.00779004,0.001341126,0.35999903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748796,0.0036469568,0.00068038475,0.0014174257,0.015962364,0.0034132865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93686485,0.010119543,0.0031589,0.0040998673,0.026730692,0.01902613],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01589752,0.0006952401,0.0005414586,0.012651367,0.017820382,0.018748684,0.003066398,0.0033131877,0.0633947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058752608,0.00066803064,0.0007917465,0.016323665,0.0068342006,0.0076856725,0.006899077,0.0023546931,0.0056433612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014010463,0.0000863736,0.0033839715,0.00038004224,0.000025077345,0.00020628101,0.0026194756,0.0005588702,0.00039930292,0.46978348,0.4295221,0.092894986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004934571,0.00002331393,0.007924479,0.000120245895,0.000012779281,0.00007593308,0.0012033291,0.00092126115,0.0002644382,0.025721151,0.96358603,0.0000977169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9042313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9047399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077132344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18079628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55963695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412397025","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvaf031","title":"Evaluating the cross-disciplinary utility of anonymizing applications for scientific equipment in the Australian research sector","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"University of New South Wales; Australian Government; Astronomy Australia Limited; Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation; National Computational Infrastructure","keywords":"Discipline; Cross disciplinary; Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9742932159734768,"score_gpt":0.8049896586778139,"score_spread":0.16930355729566293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412397025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8836503,0.02902553,0.028667606,0.011651897,0.0011504156,0.019401226,0.0023840507,0.00018660616,0.02388246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978868,0.0020875274,0.010099034,0.0013006218,0.00014862118,0.0064492165,0.0002788059,0.00003111071,0.0007370165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.64738524,0.31660062,0.013883891,0.005262428,0.014819309,0.0020485176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41772693,0.47394454,0.05861834,0.02837711,0.01845423,0.002878912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27466616,0.0008605345,0.0018692341,0.0017721673,0.0017449238,0.003996249,0.0026695393,0.0023463469,0.0060389577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4586451,0.0005830392,0.006084768,0.0030199657,0.003626689,0.004091956,0.004654317,0.003092838,0.0005566929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07388837,0.009790532,0.19697407,0.06232432,0.0450684,0.0005138227,0.025930345,0.014112494,0.0023958022,0.023535201,0.008237004,0.5372296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03940788,0.1427197,0.43034074,0.04819548,0.1223697,0.00092784205,0.016691634,0.033734143,0.017828332,0.065653384,0.08118938,0.00094177725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006721318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005592539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7253338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048311064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007961562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89446574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401998","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.12","title":"Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Communications Research Centre Canada; University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs; Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine","keywords":"Data science; Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.9677277945080556,"score_gpt":0.8158772839024488,"score_spread":0.15185051060560673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412401998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047877156,0.11693745,0.38036534,0.18216765,0.020643137,0.25425354,0.011046478,0.0045184423,0.025280165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009260304,0.056039296,0.7129054,0.008542178,0.0018261212,0.20540448,0.0035989026,0.0004653441,0.0019579954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.21953294,0.44823158,0.26887435,0.0056093177,0.05513271,0.0026191643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08649274,0.4732649,0.097954266,0.043498922,0.2938729,0.00491633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6949477,0.0045909537,0.011432288,0.08898525,0.008265705,0.022946624,0.011624368,0.014555935,0.00818345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82461077,0.006735824,0.013147718,0.073248334,0.009396997,0.018854756,0.013646555,0.015031272,0.008637704],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053078646,0.0002864274,0.0024073648,0.2824109,0.0014421319,0.00075343373,0.014586047,0.0016871184,0.003019974,0.024758419,0.19210234,0.47601506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574507,0.00031553354,0.0032481207,0.56537867,0.001586169,0.0004657324,0.004617065,0.0026947353,0.0018513713,0.022506574,0.39631778,0.00046083875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009002387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011476325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91101474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02079134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13178313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3761838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412480951","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.23216","title":"Unraveling current issues in scholarly publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.2318400514078995,"score_gpt":0.4711040804426722,"score_spread":0.2392640290347727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412480951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005402568,0.37531582,0.0013201694,0.41084686,0.20606735,0.000024886058,0.000115847586,0.0001245932,0.0056442376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013685645,0.57490104,0.0042807106,0.05784424,0.34146482,0.000038814436,0.00025689552,0.00020371105,0.0073241666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96402764,0.005582253,0.0047907955,0.002098582,0.021115312,0.002385314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7634474,0.10297698,0.011451415,0.0055109584,0.09347576,0.023137469],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045646373,0.0014523199,0.0031392558,0.016957816,0.013117444,0.046695337,0.0052773575,0.012270564,0.012988897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109245226,0.0012458795,0.0012149377,0.01933304,0.023591528,0.04747334,0.008051112,0.023452805,0.0034724954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008015221,0.00006775728,0.0010072605,0.0054330193,0.000067876215,0.00032679166,0.0038057193,0.00013057444,0.00075819273,0.07408294,0.602566,0.31167376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092690325,0.000020054877,0.00081450626,0.0025515065,0.00003732956,0.00019968473,0.0039037806,0.00012144154,0.00017236389,0.026152778,0.9659588,0.00005857874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0308778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09499501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95330465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01593102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05630299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24140394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412485041","doi":"10.32920/29586197","title":"A Mismatch Between Open Science Practices and Intentions in North America: Barriers and Incentives for Early Career and Senior Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.7238153814393795,"score_gpt":0.6311112647266011,"score_spread":0.09270411671277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412485041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96874905,0.00055626966,0.00084403076,0.024914356,0.00009073939,0.00008557524,0.000112963186,0.000022431896,0.0046245325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938876,0.0002657983,0.00069518783,0.0043705576,0.00003428758,0.00011953682,0.000054128166,0.000014341441,0.00055861106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96704894,0.018360227,0.0025115807,0.0029987202,0.0054950905,0.0035853803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82951254,0.087859444,0.03518412,0.007662256,0.012751004,0.027030682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040552214,0.00019334088,0.00046101093,0.0017491699,0.008050468,0.005157996,0.0017160722,0.0018260872,0.004108776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077565014,0.00068020413,0.000371661,0.0023864498,0.005709552,0.004461741,0.0071480256,0.0033626615,0.00027278118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020031011,0.00046919283,0.6283545,0.0004105149,0.000059440525,0.0004106946,0.28666112,0.00009291835,0.0013606169,0.004124865,0.0070516486,0.07080424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042387972,0.00019224313,0.6279264,0.00060542976,0.000024862537,0.00027807557,0.3493344,0.00034572626,0.00035838605,0.002365575,0.018433036,0.00009355664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09170775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111853585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063581425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02149018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21446317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412485042","doi":"10.32920/29586197.v1","title":"A Mismatch Between Open Science Practices and Intentions in North America: Barriers and Incentives for Early Career and Senior Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7238153814393795,"score_gpt":0.6311112647266011,"score_spread":0.09270411671277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412485042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96874905,0.00055626966,0.00084403076,0.024914356,0.00009073939,0.00008557524,0.000112963186,0.000022431896,0.0046245325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938876,0.0002657983,0.00069518783,0.0043705576,0.00003428758,0.00011953682,0.000054128166,0.000014341441,0.00055861106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96704894,0.018360227,0.0025115807,0.0029987202,0.0054950905,0.0035853803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82951254,0.087859444,0.03518412,0.007662256,0.012751004,0.027030682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040552214,0.00019334088,0.00046101093,0.0017491699,0.008050468,0.005157996,0.0017160722,0.0018260872,0.004108776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077565014,0.00068020413,0.000371661,0.0023864498,0.005709552,0.004461741,0.0071480256,0.0033626615,0.00027278118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020031011,0.00046919283,0.6283545,0.0004105149,0.000059440525,0.0004106946,0.28666112,0.00009291835,0.0013606169,0.004124865,0.0070516486,0.07080424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042387972,0.00019224313,0.6279264,0.00060542976,0.000024862537,0.00027807557,0.3493344,0.00034572626,0.00035838605,0.002365575,0.018433036,0.00009355664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09170775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111853585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063581425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02149018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21446317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412538861","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/dmgex_v2","title":"Open Science, Closed Peer Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Austrian Science Fund; University of Oxford","keywords":"Peer review; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.851523223465649,"score_gpt":0.7155276012480258,"score_spread":0.13599562221762318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412538861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014317353,0.046613004,0.075932026,0.6347356,0.045949996,0.00053856533,0.00044729866,0.0010426397,0.18042366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5848907,0.040304545,0.059122544,0.18086234,0.07346048,0.0016044774,0.00053192186,0.0011598254,0.05806313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7653219,0.12889308,0.012563641,0.016765483,0.06992356,0.006532331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4358599,0.33114088,0.04520273,0.077401266,0.08132607,0.029069249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13720013,0.00060337834,0.0016597916,0.004370311,0.005986609,0.027141519,0.0030304675,0.013667502,0.015904622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47903544,0.00061605085,0.0008760585,0.005796794,0.030198181,0.032306433,0.012039416,0.009816869,0.006328649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016272244,0.00010075108,0.003449126,0.0018482751,0.00012499026,0.00028404413,0.0049140924,0.00036133657,0.0006347686,0.61622167,0.14758131,0.2243169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007988863,0.00010451377,0.0022379833,0.0017646838,0.000040145787,0.0005454136,0.00275548,0.00059206906,0.00056269363,0.56667256,0.42454767,0.00009698826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012914115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016156551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051100287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02038941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7255923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412551538","doi":"10.51408/issi2025_017","title":"Almost Always Unequal: Co-Authors’ Contributions to Scientific Publications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.6357176527873419,"score_gpt":0.6712944468782471,"score_spread":0.035576794090905195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412551538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96470594,0.0031306061,0.012130445,0.0024375084,0.00021753335,0.00007900054,0.0015732448,0.000104631974,0.01562103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636936,0.00033248655,0.0016923025,0.00010087026,0.00012981132,0.00004782282,0.00048074665,0.00003062418,0.00081597024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93459344,0.028732782,0.0070656287,0.008384906,0.017835665,0.00338754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47563532,0.3878053,0.059096325,0.04546932,0.025404314,0.006589327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046136215,0.00040403235,0.0011769303,0.012236808,0.0024217062,0.008785148,0.0019129916,0.0011767134,0.0042128945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33311605,0.00038363322,0.000549503,0.020485068,0.003973825,0.00626282,0.0062329685,0.001664101,0.0015130327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051658874,0.000084115774,0.8835054,0.0005250617,0.0005879789,0.00038554554,0.017261392,0.0010149342,0.000994445,0.014246295,0.002566326,0.07831202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007602267,0.0001379113,0.8722637,0.00064962375,0.00049867324,0.0014392178,0.0200964,0.0059036207,0.0034666578,0.06998321,0.025367614,0.0001173356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011906758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014640759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98776317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012694938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011217897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24399453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412559609","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22290","title":"Bibliodiversity of Small Academic Publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2507105811090861,"score_gpt":0.43050092969869774,"score_spread":0.17979034858961163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412559609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712312,0.0047979834,0.0022115693,0.0063321963,0.00009641073,0.00005841119,0.0007068203,0.000098361685,0.11446696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496245,0.00077075494,0.0003528107,0.00014472115,0.00007721332,0.000022460203,0.00015350769,0.00002087391,0.003495172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811581,0.0056952755,0.0024622276,0.0026056552,0.0066814725,0.0013972735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78233325,0.13931566,0.037713323,0.015855312,0.015487804,0.009294632],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016104719,0.00016647617,0.0009597351,0.012044805,0.0044749244,0.023735568,0.0015574619,0.0009830217,0.011549703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13361779,0.00034728125,0.0002448941,0.020253375,0.006067049,0.009182998,0.009635004,0.0012405573,0.0011697214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040197733,0.00014740434,0.39704102,0.0010989256,0.00029182094,0.0015322058,0.26833743,0.00052119244,0.003377786,0.1538507,0.0042968867,0.16910261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068718145,0.00020232954,0.53458786,0.0008641075,0.00019422839,0.0023230524,0.19140442,0.0010385495,0.002966125,0.078552,0.1876358,0.0001628956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004520262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00546404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00395744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004148928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085170865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412570109","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2500322122","title":"Tenure and research trajectories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Northwestern University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Novelty; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6341620963141554,"score_gpt":0.6173253069681607,"score_spread":0.01683678934599475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412570109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347607,0.0051079066,0.008517259,0.006783036,0.0001822432,0.000108528264,0.01166143,0.00022666523,0.03265233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867993,0.0016615655,0.0027931351,0.0002323382,0.00011018811,0.0000954119,0.0040573427,0.00007793845,0.004172827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933003,0.0022863753,0.00082174764,0.001141326,0.001523326,0.00092688855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92332554,0.025215864,0.023595873,0.0060101673,0.010186622,0.011665823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008961728,0.00021954774,0.00050915574,0.004702658,0.0021937243,0.0051105646,0.0010813443,0.00076509285,0.008597577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060663592,0.00026965342,0.00050245185,0.0111703705,0.0016108005,0.0042932667,0.0042378106,0.0013610836,0.0024393909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022085651,0.00009104234,0.92524236,0.00017128888,0.00013711213,0.00012053734,0.0040946794,0.0012999387,0.0004598815,0.011810785,0.0041521504,0.052199345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023959314,0.00013835804,0.9506218,0.00020104671,0.00003783696,0.00023213119,0.004568017,0.001264204,0.00047263128,0.01131439,0.031064069,0.00006149145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010266853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014440481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022653092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036282388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047394693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412611926","doi":"10.31134/ap.94.2.20","title":"Exigencia del depósito de los datos de investigación en los criterios de indexación de SciELO","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Archivos de Pediatría del Uruguay","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; SciELO; Philosophy; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2539148528626518,"score_gpt":0.5182398903202017,"score_spread":0.26432503745754987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412611926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014357268,0.0867267,0.017594319,0.42091882,0.050765667,0.0011042485,0.06724846,0.0015251712,0.33975932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36044425,0.12516168,0.06966393,0.1276394,0.05571529,0.0053854277,0.05910566,0.0027396395,0.19414482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360093,0.0135836685,0.00938541,0.0025683388,0.036370203,0.002083122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7248431,0.08295242,0.030658213,0.016134728,0.13497035,0.010441258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060026716,0.00090040243,0.0014195936,0.029444652,0.0027048076,0.021954242,0.0033317823,0.0036817414,0.029175092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22356948,0.0007438496,0.0013376666,0.031778343,0.0031533286,0.008895983,0.0082864985,0.005697754,0.008709009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024483594,0.000050925664,0.010279818,0.0029710867,0.00012721214,0.00008268676,0.0011036147,0.00035953036,0.00022953787,0.054747153,0.70872605,0.22107755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037025653,0.00005035335,0.01739622,0.0036385013,0.00006743268,0.00010135122,0.0007138682,0.00044864003,0.00046136882,0.007991327,0.96904,0.000053916363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031170134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035732698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014083278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02696302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3174554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412676988","doi":"10.7759/cureus.88858","title":"Author and Journal Self-Citation in General Surgery Original Research Articles","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cureus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; General surgery; Library science","score_opus":0.7754175958995174,"score_gpt":0.6560449212250098,"score_spread":0.11937267467450763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412676988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863695,0.007618016,0.00033991627,0.00034151936,0.00010659938,0.000035919747,0.0029174224,0.000028234685,0.0022428026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996601,0.0013881534,0.00033571088,0.000038644266,0.00008048889,0.000030219426,0.0011019075,0.000011245952,0.00041265588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99098384,0.0019218426,0.00250979,0.000959522,0.003274631,0.0003503415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383995,0.05880263,0.07679932,0.0052234763,0.01640675,0.0043682777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006995887,0.00023714414,0.00050802744,0.017966092,0.00046058852,0.001861986,0.0006426071,0.0005539308,0.0036848057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06966863,0.00019269252,0.00069372676,0.01847344,0.00069373037,0.001946017,0.001136216,0.00041075496,0.00070934725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291647,0.000014941503,0.99420375,0.00017558085,0.00008802487,0.00007954257,0.00016791935,0.00006713473,0.000057618774,0.000059930335,0.00032245636,0.0046901735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006738889,0.000066817076,0.99696654,0.00011011389,0.00006864457,0.0008795559,0.00034892934,0.00021759243,0.00014155095,0.00015801769,0.0010276765,0.000007906922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012512894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019433933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000759015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011272926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036998212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412716533","doi":"10.51408/issi2025_125","title":"How is the Sino-US AI Collaboration Reshaped by the China Initiative?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Geopolitics; China; Field (mathematics); Political science; Vulnerability (computing); Regional science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.35066417756335855,"score_gpt":0.5498720311894008,"score_spread":0.1992078536260422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412716533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9258507,0.0039506233,0.00075155805,0.015329036,0.00018948293,0.000024157389,0.0026984354,0.00006542898,0.05114059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587953,0.0011508017,0.00017394088,0.0004749548,0.00006213674,0.000015390708,0.0009490213,0.000017299979,0.0012769017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822754,0.00039213672,0.00012788507,0.00031322835,0.00039905336,0.00054016383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994325,0.0010157928,0.0019489251,0.00047648457,0.0009036205,0.0013302041],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002678018,0.00015439252,0.00039925435,0.0038350404,0.002317761,0.0055031357,0.0004645189,0.00060776307,0.004787698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008956148,0.00012983594,0.00025034233,0.011515138,0.0019792365,0.005159104,0.0031173888,0.00087910646,0.00063860416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023268868,0.00006916666,0.79390335,0.00033527004,0.00018525922,0.0006706267,0.030491708,0.0009337874,0.0011518667,0.06425349,0.019583998,0.08818888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024196144,0.00005962799,0.8380891,0.00033732862,0.00006193309,0.0001804004,0.039876044,0.0012205512,0.0007078119,0.009048133,0.110343,0.000051819923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05212183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095050715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030153466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006498987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10363686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412861200","doi":"10.5206/elip.v7i1.22241","title":"Open Access &amp; Scholarly Communication Habits in LIS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emerging Library & Information Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Media studies; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.4327821307053743,"score_gpt":0.5868101196489157,"score_spread":0.15402798894354142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412861200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622071,0.0029861527,0.000667548,0.0036398966,0.000021300606,0.000036245063,0.00082262326,0.00007247108,0.029546713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432015,0.0014743701,0.00044968215,0.00026193194,0.00003732272,0.000036494173,0.00045174986,0.000022725624,0.0029455363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867829,0.0054181027,0.002049409,0.0007874663,0.0042979913,0.00066410325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8789904,0.07428619,0.031619735,0.0032350651,0.008367387,0.0035011047],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009378572,0.00013504144,0.0004251009,0.015810182,0.0026661986,0.00948928,0.00081247883,0.0009960666,0.0069797374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06821588,0.00027534028,0.00025854693,0.027872225,0.002236564,0.008558618,0.00410861,0.0007213362,0.0018625797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011757547,0.00018737867,0.75369114,0.00076280476,0.00007731597,0.00040670036,0.10890718,0.00021285903,0.000439496,0.010074436,0.004582454,0.120540634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001438703,0.00010706764,0.80352026,0.0007559737,0.000061610015,0.00082514744,0.13326575,0.0009343375,0.00081440224,0.0062073343,0.053411167,0.000082502855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064555914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009999111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029630698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04959917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412886659","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162577.2","title":"“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Open peer review; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Open science; Plant biology; Open data; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Pandemic; Physiology; Medicine; Neuroscience; History; Biology; Virology; Political science; Pathology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Astronomy; Disease; Physics; Outbreak","score_opus":0.7318407363937084,"score_gpt":0.617907542556378,"score_spread":0.11393319383733036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412886659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05532537,0.020588795,0.0031961626,0.88056546,0.0034825688,0.000049446513,0.00024816094,0.000034581768,0.036509518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575192,0.022389688,0.0036430869,0.10296656,0.003583679,0.00016675981,0.00034399692,0.00021076435,0.009176218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91956204,0.05705289,0.002945421,0.004579786,0.012111391,0.0037485184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7937716,0.16847815,0.0100145,0.005917394,0.014096537,0.0077217636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.105439745,0.00029513912,0.00091314164,0.0051672356,0.011811234,0.040576205,0.0022965248,0.009634976,0.0048428625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1877083,0.00044099937,0.0007708149,0.010837535,0.049516518,0.034314755,0.011053652,0.012598763,0.0009913117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019368017,0.000054143748,0.0048204972,0.0012882124,0.00006867229,0.0004489721,0.16646464,0.0003135598,0.0004038345,0.68700475,0.06870354,0.07023554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039444367,0.0000447949,0.008239271,0.0032471824,0.00003133959,0.00021963615,0.15691458,0.00047115918,0.0006377097,0.16313536,0.6668835,0.00013603979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015904428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015143475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026125599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02944442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5576253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413008886","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.17","title":"On the open road to universal indexing: OpenAlex and Open Journal Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8496207791303315,"score_gpt":0.7015085151665741,"score_spread":0.14811226396375743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413008886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79963005,0.0049306117,0.0360608,0.026351172,0.00018557603,0.00013954173,0.0006832142,0.0002130846,0.13180596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957137,0.0004029891,0.0025499018,0.00029136488,0.000065331136,0.000030238309,0.00010225938,0.000033059994,0.0008111303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95265573,0.023341991,0.0036166143,0.00453329,0.0114786085,0.004373794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7928424,0.1259704,0.031103963,0.026366957,0.013412115,0.010304179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048763223,0.0002969302,0.0010679135,0.012389378,0.00592988,0.019602912,0.001839982,0.0013533662,0.010143804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15052754,0.00042354505,0.00047043097,0.018434936,0.024943298,0.027306935,0.024729412,0.0021206925,0.0007183631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014033054,0.000114258546,0.102806,0.00044696755,0.0000793385,0.00019769273,0.034760144,0.000708705,0.00062897,0.7724415,0.0024516003,0.08522444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059052087,0.00013927721,0.11821001,0.0009221953,0.000081172,0.0005416782,0.061630927,0.0032136801,0.0014124243,0.74084735,0.07283568,0.0001065928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004399975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004186812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00717355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074824044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25788772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413024604","doi":"10.1002/asi.70013","title":"Understanding discrepancies in the coverage of <scp>OpenAlex</scp> : The case of China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec; China Scholarship Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Geography","score_opus":0.25345515263717894,"score_gpt":0.4762531204382082,"score_spread":0.22279796780102928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413024604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628134,0.001977556,0.0009976813,0.002579037,0.000027640386,0.000028597557,0.010684971,0.00008045925,0.020810645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937598,0.0004479843,0.0002997442,0.0001156694,0.000029096385,0.000015608877,0.0044956952,0.000015694466,0.0008206238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994972,0.00092440506,0.0006697636,0.00064844836,0.0019370588,0.00084830035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500362,0.01985763,0.012341975,0.005900084,0.010543878,0.001320251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008182893,0.00018611802,0.00057206466,0.012746448,0.00093783543,0.0033421542,0.0010065439,0.00037330456,0.0034038818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040458616,0.00014990743,0.00039306786,0.025551325,0.00092477363,0.0026317078,0.0024303705,0.0004351456,0.00037336844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011675528,0.000034943972,0.9026832,0.0005019851,0.00028037158,0.00094925205,0.004567245,0.002634925,0.0007969938,0.01995211,0.010132577,0.057349592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011202252,0.00002629542,0.9670167,0.00020364021,0.00011371161,0.0002518838,0.0030014212,0.002464432,0.0012297777,0.0024387236,0.023216793,0.000025291414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05479484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04107728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027642157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029770373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10895181},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4413029909","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1614750","title":"Visualisation of research hotspots in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease based on the web of science database","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province","keywords":"Web of science; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Metadata; Inflammatory bowel disease; Library science; MEDLINE; Disease; Computer science; Pathology; World Wide Web; Political science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.39250363138553346,"score_gpt":0.5436638234530875,"score_spread":0.15116019206755404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413029909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65672845,0.03301103,0.015697237,0.003911847,0.00046891774,0.0009199926,0.23265344,0.008312963,0.04829606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815797,0.01603268,0.06890246,0.00019895028,0.00027268747,0.0008947235,0.09288663,0.00044164687,0.004573184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819344,0.00043454106,0.00039295026,0.00024655246,0.00059148524,0.00014108498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867025,0.00783594,0.0028718426,0.0004729324,0.0015770022,0.000539882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002752674,0.0008769572,0.00096897606,0.090890564,0.0007477842,0.0049585197,0.0005972594,0.0008380844,0.0057982863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014256702,0.00024876388,0.0011499642,0.09359993,0.00027547,0.0027836822,0.0023682928,0.00043261374,0.000990398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013277559,0.00032148443,0.35246232,0.022190265,0.0017097585,0.0028295408,0.011851001,0.009479365,0.010324281,0.024191774,0.08149539,0.48181716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002208586,0.00038030554,0.66940874,0.004723251,0.0011510889,0.002218328,0.013393166,0.027942639,0.003978313,0.01555508,0.2607864,0.00024180977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063295276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008767328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99724734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008992721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018573878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0193972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413072117","doi":"10.26833/ijeg.1680503","title":"Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity performance of International journal of engineering and geosciences WOS example (2016-2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Web of science; Library science; Computer science; Scope (computer science); Data science; Political science; Economics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.13927813081264026,"score_gpt":0.4352097000231643,"score_spread":0.295931569210524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413072117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8990005,0.008769323,0.0029843515,0.0015814863,0.0002544202,0.00034138723,0.048068654,0.000480681,0.03851911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94962776,0.0056091812,0.0042980085,0.00009078276,0.00036956393,0.00040766294,0.03470745,0.000088703215,0.0048008217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901624,0.0010932584,0.0020679336,0.0006471624,0.005376866,0.0006523815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97168094,0.0093316985,0.007262286,0.001307045,0.009288898,0.0011291528],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066690133,0.0005624013,0.0011262826,0.07228009,0.00078572845,0.0044650403,0.00075377326,0.00057565485,0.0037740164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037360888,0.00016135321,0.0012540253,0.10283337,0.0005233984,0.0030350566,0.0020057706,0.0004588674,0.0016115162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052550255,0.0003453456,0.7010258,0.00580757,0.0013292336,0.00075913063,0.0041308124,0.0040806825,0.004024339,0.005606927,0.025495293,0.24686931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024766932,0.00022134393,0.9403038,0.00060175353,0.0005250843,0.00067668,0.0052237823,0.0047854977,0.003270395,0.0018880164,0.04239565,0.00008327721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052459384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004748991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017440211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003279298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03526956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413183986","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scaf034","title":"Stockholm science: the syndrome, not the city!!!","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5103460381164318,"score_gpt":0.5997239427221325,"score_spread":0.08937790460570072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413183986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030495146,0.022790518,0.0025904414,0.65740466,0.012530347,0.000024794917,0.0004268477,0.00031082582,0.27342638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80360657,0.031513702,0.0021251943,0.10069883,0.006043968,0.00012495583,0.00046857478,0.00053792086,0.054880265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126476,0.0037468902,0.00055640604,0.0010187749,0.002350305,0.0010627056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98587173,0.0064700316,0.0019323267,0.0014806383,0.0023810223,0.0018642221],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007856614,0.0005020579,0.00091349933,0.0037807506,0.008307053,0.018695885,0.00090040034,0.0052853213,0.017400187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018302212,0.00036328845,0.0003994263,0.007236185,0.029230265,0.009587178,0.013477891,0.008398733,0.005588814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008931523,0.000038223283,0.003920073,0.00030204613,0.000036838846,0.0014426371,0.0137336245,0.00013949878,0.00022997246,0.67401785,0.2690333,0.03701652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037887836,0.000023017728,0.0018601356,0.00092372054,0.000019990846,0.0014193673,0.025003558,0.00011139807,0.00023457447,0.19936495,0.77094203,0.000059429753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070919613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071269977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063614603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007607676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05820936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413219294","doi":"10.14293/ease.2023.004","title":"Recommendations and Guidelines for Creating Scholarly Biomedical Journals: A Scoping Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.9265834274666833,"score_gpt":0.7350645275926305,"score_spread":0.1915188998740528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413219294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001968619,0.18265022,0.06511126,0.43989617,0.050840225,0.20792606,0.017691279,0.0029225727,0.030993614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058880104,0.1956133,0.532921,0.036016136,0.0039357156,0.20087849,0.014648633,0.00060787116,0.00949093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.5857189,0.22361167,0.14216581,0.006729667,0.037290215,0.00448363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20121552,0.4002037,0.08807057,0.023098646,0.27121425,0.016197326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.39901876,0.0057492815,0.010055876,0.07818935,0.009301669,0.03133836,0.017669672,0.028748162,0.028446574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6454295,0.0069915755,0.017526718,0.07601169,0.010476865,0.03575536,0.016249867,0.017604852,0.024836183],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026258195,0.0003577108,0.001596779,0.23084152,0.00081872934,0.00048116042,0.0049209544,0.0008773114,0.0006508722,0.010841171,0.5232263,0.22512504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039238582,0.00011164955,0.0013939951,0.69336957,0.00108462,0.00018952602,0.004258224,0.0007842337,0.0003681941,0.01523244,0.28257844,0.00023678917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024064906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03907276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96866167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026154198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17207992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7411169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413236578","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/db643_v1","title":"Inventory of Current Approaches, Initiatives, and Practices in Canadian Academic Institutions to Foster the Engagement of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts in the Science-Policy Interface","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; General partnership; The arts; Public relations; Political science; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Public policy; Public administration; Indigenous; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9227142591576021,"score_gpt":0.658692618542499,"score_spread":0.264021640615103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413236578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.815347,0.015968079,0.0055115228,0.034064967,0.00022001016,0.00042491,0.001715263,0.00034548758,0.12640269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117435,0.007159103,0.0042229025,0.0012814638,0.000019825697,0.00009479334,0.0004928826,0.000040839994,0.0055137756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736408,0.004517541,0.0011534762,0.0020782473,0.01155133,0.0070585706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96158355,0.0065371054,0.0030094222,0.0018987862,0.015880939,0.011090252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019479277,0.00045763905,0.00062130345,0.01221508,0.020245353,0.015667664,0.0035305726,0.0016054285,0.002690332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031307634,0.000619293,0.0005548407,0.025436454,0.009849321,0.0045743203,0.008872487,0.0018674656,0.00034422794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561567,0.00020102077,0.21690369,0.002106308,0.000143422,0.0004986203,0.28126666,0.0015525114,0.0035883328,0.056915786,0.015929788,0.4207377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014631253,0.00010264674,0.3739227,0.0013905836,0.00010648296,0.00023922753,0.36388662,0.0013345852,0.0016202481,0.0038051135,0.25337172,0.00020547984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9679082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18040211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3619765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9506174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413310034","doi":"10.51224/srxiv.600","title":"Rethinking where and how we publish in health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6415366647049812,"score_gpt":0.5975059528798441,"score_spread":0.04403071182513707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413310034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003822856,0.019043436,0.020564996,0.90417045,0.017830506,0.00018109992,0.00012798175,0.00042340724,0.0338353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33325437,0.06512511,0.09276455,0.4260096,0.04551286,0.0015511552,0.0003433748,0.0028762748,0.032562636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6304063,0.25450945,0.029934922,0.017680475,0.059111323,0.008357521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3869992,0.43059516,0.02092335,0.047779653,0.07687035,0.036832273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28231922,0.0010808443,0.0021920968,0.007967805,0.019460473,0.12312788,0.009135041,0.022593727,0.01021371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42133203,0.0017689503,0.0018567207,0.0075115906,0.08874549,0.08275064,0.031521194,0.032971077,0.006266166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010036271,0.00013782592,0.0034312855,0.0030735675,0.00020025477,0.0005019452,0.07195435,0.0008382176,0.001040964,0.57421535,0.14007767,0.20442821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051110655,0.00007774152,0.0015071642,0.005223402,0.00006973039,0.00030485142,0.028893752,0.00036469448,0.0006619259,0.2849083,0.6777905,0.00014681686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010427894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012759818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8768721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019323139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08736152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8850282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413411404","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2025-0040","title":"How research funding shapes academic outputs: Evidence from communication research paper characteristics and thematic trends in China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"China; Thematic map; Project management; Regional science; Thematic analysis; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Data science; Political science; Library science; Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Business; Geography; Management; Engineering; Sociology; Economics; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.7930535504216464,"score_gpt":0.6508492137836807,"score_spread":0.14220433663796572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413411404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987508,0.0021491528,0.0006138828,0.0013222384,0.000053656695,0.00004952547,0.0014236919,0.000031751453,0.0068479883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997647,0.00071694783,0.00020546484,0.0000435941,0.000053835895,0.000046466706,0.00039794898,0.000009672701,0.0008790372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896277,0.00328495,0.0017773089,0.0011163829,0.0031438018,0.0010498129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9070017,0.040669106,0.027299667,0.0039427457,0.014863019,0.0062238397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015378361,0.0004089142,0.00084248336,0.01575353,0.001767436,0.004620715,0.0010767658,0.0006712711,0.0047265496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059265193,0.00024526354,0.0006447493,0.03243586,0.0011376576,0.0032645853,0.0026203704,0.00041822833,0.00059335685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021414646,0.00006605577,0.9144684,0.00072650507,0.00023154287,0.00037949212,0.012120983,0.000537337,0.00056109746,0.002699963,0.0021772145,0.06581731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026557684,0.00008017883,0.9756271,0.00024339191,0.00019769876,0.000120532335,0.010695727,0.001491538,0.00063130585,0.0030198677,0.007821949,0.000044153378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015717749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011471344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98462164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004085952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007632369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081329465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413564844","doi":"10.64628/aap.e9q7jncyh","title":"Prix Nobel : les chercheurs canadiens aspirent à plus","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.8492307129579211,"score_gpt":0.6045842847151017,"score_spread":0.24464642824281935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413564844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06034835,0.06734322,0.0062258863,0.4924382,0.020687846,0.00004605866,0.0009963028,0.000726691,0.35118735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47949457,0.018978238,0.004853817,0.028244214,0.00603537,0.0001513244,0.00063263066,0.00052608026,0.46108374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271214,0.001952802,0.00016903257,0.0010792746,0.0030881509,0.000998749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241275,0.0026285609,0.0005495547,0.0006999693,0.0021750552,0.0015342038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066926954,0.00122774,0.0011798386,0.0039474536,0.007721109,0.018927624,0.0011394531,0.0068650846,0.02534115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023569535,0.00053229247,0.00073530164,0.005350052,0.006253035,0.010427359,0.0059690387,0.01031798,0.00941495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046911254,0.0000894496,0.0035876245,0.00023035487,0.00008033794,0.0004574646,0.004866294,0.0006512262,0.00079987844,0.6965984,0.17980203,0.11236783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066080356,0.000048711732,0.0058442736,0.0002877548,0.00002672601,0.00051554386,0.003478964,0.00055669475,0.000802367,0.12322198,0.8650538,0.0000971816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037536792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032842454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014100755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010022395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10230857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413595410","doi":"10.64628/ab.nssa4eesh","title":"Quarter Life series: how we secured new republishing partners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Series (stratigraphy); History; Geology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6820152912886026,"score_gpt":0.5810615179761768,"score_spread":0.10095377331242583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413595410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09785455,0.005716263,0.04979291,0.25023556,0.02365806,0.0008223979,0.0078822225,0.01827442,0.5457637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2865723,0.002946532,0.022455137,0.012171901,0.0056142095,0.0005298098,0.0077725826,0.009507523,0.65243006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889733,0.0039061378,0.0007563967,0.0012548168,0.0036666887,0.0014427413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9272913,0.016031073,0.0039858855,0.016254209,0.0168634,0.019574193],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020311136,0.000754854,0.000706815,0.006289949,0.0054199523,0.020042833,0.0025094836,0.0035750587,0.16535574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095306575,0.0007002912,0.0006195117,0.00791745,0.0024492142,0.023541262,0.0077423924,0.0048260237,0.06925123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003822075,0.00032170216,0.007825572,0.00014688325,0.00003109674,0.00030990946,0.0019209501,0.00074664614,0.0010594582,0.09745422,0.65651065,0.23329072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005213186,0.0001508979,0.002992101,0.00010270302,0.000020758267,0.00018131023,0.0019584438,0.0020402635,0.0012591883,0.02700901,0.9641574,0.000075781274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004412109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004081777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97995716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00443494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008901467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5531701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413901500","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71964","title":"Building Meaningful Relationships for Equity in the Publishing Ecosystem: Empowering Latin American Research Through Engagement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Pará","keywords":"Publishing; Transformative learning; Equity (law); Latin Americans; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.6480030632747693,"score_gpt":0.6187939220166401,"score_spread":0.029209141258129234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413901500","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101877115,0.0059931404,0.00034320678,0.07743449,0.914501,0.000021662341,0.000041419407,0.00004287626,0.0015203094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018305506,0.008926442,0.0005250313,0.026870893,0.9540059,0.000039984803,0.000035187604,0.00007278667,0.007693258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873459,0.0030625465,0.0016496882,0.001043811,0.0062334454,0.0006646985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91515785,0.05572905,0.0020128181,0.0014419251,0.02073586,0.0049224277],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018540911,0.0020531914,0.0023905833,0.004266599,0.005016473,0.015313571,0.0033877818,0.012889173,0.0069080996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062812336,0.0007322974,0.0016112746,0.0025530122,0.005449476,0.0064587025,0.0029152997,0.017907657,0.003727551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019217612,0.000016149212,0.00007304322,0.00038523736,0.000017201308,0.00013166951,0.00014277906,0.00004425616,0.00007595879,0.0026147694,0.9853763,0.011103433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022318063,0.000013013653,0.00028885755,0.0006790912,0.000035265006,0.00016225105,0.0002716269,0.00021592299,0.00014949191,0.004833255,0.99330235,0.000026601885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002517338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008559941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042177606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077028424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098054826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413904807","doi":"10.1007/s10734-025-01530-z","title":"Geopolitical tensions: impact on and trajectory of Canada-China joint research publications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; China; Joint (building); Higher education; Political science; Trajectory; Regional science; Economic geography; Economic growth; Development economics; Geography; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.619288739869519,"score_gpt":0.6335682549767061,"score_spread":0.014279515107187057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413904807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460731,0.0018973933,0.00029717328,0.007411142,0.00009662702,0.00004044149,0.0046871672,0.00009778412,0.039399166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837775,0.0007408704,0.0001291801,0.000113899754,0.000023502189,0.000012022509,0.0010526389,0.000019290936,0.009531018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656516,0.00018597239,0.00021595301,0.00027610987,0.0013482553,0.001408529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700041,0.004026573,0.005008222,0.0006839395,0.012109951,0.008167231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024239628,0.0002620144,0.0005725747,0.012377266,0.0053167227,0.011147566,0.0012638206,0.0010340943,0.012578658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019545712,0.00028052158,0.0004777277,0.029743968,0.0022060333,0.002878956,0.004514807,0.0015150858,0.0008533062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036342777,0.00008972883,0.88422865,0.00015467775,0.00017694058,0.00058159314,0.012748339,0.001997075,0.00054637133,0.043033283,0.019414049,0.03666594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020969217,0.000026131282,0.9275821,0.00015151798,0.00007226495,0.00007537765,0.032111447,0.0017664853,0.00037726117,0.0019766486,0.035782382,0.000057352336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.933396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9527748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99757606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03128553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10367565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2269935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414081416","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05928-3","title":"Open access publishing: is urology ready? A survey of authors, readers, and editorial board’s knowledge, impressions and satisfaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Urology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Publishing; Nephrology; Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Open access publishing","score_opus":0.4900108197610373,"score_gpt":0.5898731584514749,"score_spread":0.09986233869043765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414081416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881356,0.0019354735,0.0001735762,0.00307499,0.00018649735,0.000035246496,0.00073085283,0.000025283565,0.005702537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621385,0.0010572643,0.00031801983,0.0005399205,0.00033670972,0.000020082416,0.00037494733,0.000012506375,0.0011268208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368733,0.0012788646,0.0010797492,0.00029344708,0.003142534,0.00051808025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.926023,0.023712197,0.029362632,0.0012346447,0.009766714,0.009900764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072634406,0.00013984462,0.0005350097,0.0030184358,0.00081337785,0.0029727279,0.0004325721,0.0008303259,0.0044187517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049334705,0.00019170658,0.0006009833,0.0032653331,0.00061699713,0.0023002964,0.0010455372,0.00093520666,0.00081255165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020427085,0.00025235993,0.9646985,0.00020530986,0.00014407051,0.00024989436,0.0026164865,0.00005203958,0.00025896583,0.00009834785,0.0042888443,0.02693086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025674937,0.00038454952,0.9831217,0.00013201556,0.00009467498,0.0009993151,0.008924896,0.00027035468,0.00018073648,0.00016991823,0.005660283,0.00003581445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012051471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016871186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99956745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005334558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013371272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038413167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414096008","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/nduxf_v2","title":"Transforming excellence? From ‘matter of fact’ to ‘matter of concern’ in research funding organizations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Austrian Science Fund; Fondazione Telethon; Wellcome Trust; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Michael Smith Health Research BC; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Meritocracy; Competition (biology); Grant funding; Promotion (chess); Empirical research","score_opus":0.7710304275994178,"score_gpt":0.6335879332558711,"score_spread":0.1374424943435466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414096008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5838802,0.010238438,0.04597977,0.19475812,0.0008572947,0.00014078255,0.000055702163,0.00015678251,0.16393287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941355,0.0006286122,0.002316664,0.001716969,0.00014546076,0.000043423886,0.000009051407,0.000029756471,0.00097455987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85753894,0.10906952,0.0049684737,0.005550874,0.01644463,0.0064275283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.854089,0.087522276,0.023225622,0.012409499,0.012600917,0.010152756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10564526,0.00034697994,0.0012941961,0.004838372,0.014324832,0.033909146,0.001685586,0.004995224,0.0020604725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14701326,0.00037416018,0.00055991794,0.007341284,0.06828177,0.029929997,0.019088814,0.0047351755,0.00037478688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082975355,0.000049504342,0.013475862,0.00024462002,0.000038186918,0.00021188863,0.15121575,0.00043912136,0.00049848494,0.78266066,0.0029462844,0.048136607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004662307,0.000116601426,0.014299933,0.000755748,0.000052723957,0.00028581673,0.15009384,0.000925033,0.000752497,0.7017574,0.13081193,0.000101820646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030062033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022362906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018647278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01812297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55871224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414155839","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.3","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Gender inequality; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7281416742780339,"score_gpt":0.5965459017134839,"score_spread":0.13159577256455002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414155839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876825,0.0020913414,0.0006477746,0.0020384507,0.00017239536,0.000038631304,0.00040108935,0.000027908585,0.006899946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976667,0.0004088108,0.00022907552,0.00027164322,0.000077624434,0.000013246922,0.00010936271,0.00000986547,0.0012136055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914847,0.0033338936,0.0011309312,0.000992803,0.002022428,0.0010353274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94537777,0.023622358,0.020806214,0.002843597,0.0031481395,0.004201931],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008232831,0.00022633356,0.0005211895,0.0024971862,0.0013521804,0.0018388517,0.0005593837,0.0005250253,0.010522283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056063466,0.0002020647,0.0002815102,0.002848579,0.00068707316,0.0012786527,0.0015371207,0.00049320736,0.0009690477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038720854,0.000281547,0.949001,0.00023353446,0.00012859696,0.00046843482,0.007995048,0.000053675594,0.0013688256,0.0013767316,0.0026979053,0.03600752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027881953,0.0002079233,0.9812335,0.00018858185,0.000044783483,0.0005418234,0.0077827973,0.00016732156,0.0006626276,0.0033756446,0.0057417485,0.000025554242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025626742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004202483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057631504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014696928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04353988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414218259","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/q6fpw_v1","title":"University journals in the global academic publishing landscape: Mapping over 19,000 diverse titles","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Discipline; Identification (biology); Scholarly communication; Web of science; Electronic publishing; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.5837607990015768,"score_gpt":0.5647070565081341,"score_spread":0.019053742493442716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414218259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831571,0.0034950771,0.00049274246,0.00034825318,0.000013746234,0.00003004035,0.007863186,0.000024677474,0.0045753145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708785,0.0023160065,0.0017106095,0.00006231103,0.00004876164,0.000046792782,0.008021602,0.000024609764,0.0006814332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962692,0.0008444508,0.00060610106,0.000701555,0.0012245737,0.000354143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562014,0.0056539783,0.0052954513,0.0006948177,0.0018932259,0.00084239885],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026847073,0.0003122277,0.0006126696,0.033533532,0.00096403953,0.0047078407,0.0004419237,0.00039738466,0.0023656804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012842765,0.0001971899,0.00039091153,0.06772996,0.00091473,0.0032847621,0.003691064,0.00038623257,0.0006929976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105425504,0.000068668705,0.9092028,0.00094841246,0.00018618852,0.00045979244,0.012448026,0.00046745912,0.0011629927,0.004234456,0.0032349161,0.067480855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014558984,0.000039882583,0.95647454,0.0002874327,0.00007935276,0.0006864515,0.016265685,0.0008858812,0.00040806283,0.0016689993,0.023160648,0.000028507962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006492254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009672236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082759245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012307245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014198303},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4414358161","doi":"10.1038/s41893-025-01634-5","title":"Mapping meta-analyses on organochlorine pesticides reveals low methodological quality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Sustainability","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Organochlorine pesticide; Environmental quality; Wildlife; Quality assessment","score_opus":0.8336038478189276,"score_gpt":0.710067715191921,"score_spread":0.12353613262700658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414358161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13233016,0.44832227,0.30748972,0.05309724,0.0029160893,0.004868557,0.030345278,0.00256417,0.018066566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8233515,0.03942643,0.117091656,0.0052024038,0.0007016215,0.0045026527,0.007937459,0.00085674325,0.00092966505],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.49049625,0.3190748,0.12721011,0.023122173,0.03814844,0.0019482123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13459858,0.69628954,0.06678138,0.06384524,0.03728816,0.0011970951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38185406,0.0022671216,0.006330107,0.026963774,0.0024881493,0.01402535,0.004125739,0.002778608,0.004251368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7771929,0.0017306168,0.013451616,0.033428445,0.0043849484,0.006416476,0.007732669,0.002820418,0.0007138267],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019218469,0.00010852591,0.19321108,0.20759542,0.22768974,0.0007498185,0.0073017064,0.008889352,0.0026656284,0.02595882,0.021322772,0.30258524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014166349,0.0008357982,0.20102614,0.20159562,0.2823449,0.0012131567,0.005470244,0.015520663,0.008337288,0.14296609,0.13842556,0.000847998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008984694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01303704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99366987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047682677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012905206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76228404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414377849","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12414","title":"A Bibliometric Review of a Decade of Integrated Reporting Research <sup>*</sup>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scopus; Audit; Bibliometrics; Content analysis; Web of science; Social network analysis; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.5316980882387053,"score_gpt":0.6206452050134392,"score_spread":0.08894711677473388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414377849","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025920311,0.92783743,0.003719775,0.011034734,0.001885512,0.00033102956,0.011042562,0.00030451638,0.017924016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14168143,0.83052105,0.0078783985,0.0022041942,0.003087215,0.0005766032,0.012610038,0.00018990716,0.0012512006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.943781,0.01665738,0.015081021,0.0037628498,0.019625017,0.0010926094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6579929,0.20496348,0.04521168,0.0142754335,0.074807614,0.0027488405],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04873091,0.0010208957,0.0037978692,0.20461684,0.0018927095,0.010065725,0.0024061643,0.0014630035,0.0041627716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17110816,0.0009967231,0.0024227155,0.2852429,0.002952815,0.010003318,0.0042205933,0.0013357494,0.0013294828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001724484,0.000113291644,0.039728854,0.15286219,0.0033720254,0.0004308434,0.0044921786,0.001051595,0.0008611245,0.012475984,0.068540856,0.71589875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049081224,0.00023977435,0.1890933,0.17145011,0.005607366,0.001143269,0.010001527,0.0017483102,0.0013819084,0.006663941,0.61238664,0.00023483996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066208914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011858958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79538316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057174973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01727861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25771677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414426843","doi":"10.59350/mp76s-rkp03","title":"A Gentle Introduction to Open Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Open science; Open source","score_opus":0.6297198839837761,"score_gpt":0.6657768772410038,"score_spread":0.036056993257227665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414426843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005582523,0.048881903,0.035855055,0.41878873,0.26132455,0.00027601238,0.00058489497,0.001790159,0.23194042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010390374,0.060081318,0.025712498,0.18826564,0.22793227,0.0006335205,0.0006560167,0.0025987243,0.48372963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959435,0.0012660996,0.00028492825,0.00042830678,0.0017545109,0.00032264902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864542,0.0062963227,0.00042834613,0.00087079214,0.002904335,0.003045995],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065014227,0.0011879276,0.0008030227,0.0027790056,0.0044572284,0.008614937,0.0015860006,0.0057269903,0.07210327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02446894,0.0006467051,0.0011707675,0.0018294149,0.005304282,0.010682176,0.006633501,0.017406605,0.051604893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011108526,0.00001908479,0.000055089222,0.00014618442,0.0000037202444,0.00010248299,0.0002602577,0.00006103959,0.00015322685,0.041391984,0.9161706,0.041625302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028487186,0.000008708486,0.00006252603,0.00014160454,7.7985027e-7,0.00013738296,0.00010973963,0.000027093285,0.000023183553,0.018949797,0.9805295,0.0000069009607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037220248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024479262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003708054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24120945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414601301","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2424143122","title":"The distinctive innovation patterns and network embeddedness of scientific prizewinners","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Embeddedness; Productivity; Sociology of scientific knowledge","score_opus":0.339970910934151,"score_gpt":0.5208850410943732,"score_spread":0.18091413016022218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414601301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99749964,0.00017076722,0.0004280065,0.00006174312,0.0000052978485,0.0000066581915,0.00013054538,0.000006113438,0.0016911173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900204,0.00008056087,0.00025998324,0.000007536249,0.000007519572,0.000007349431,0.00014815602,0.0000040804207,0.00048281698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987016,0.00032465986,0.00012338386,0.0003571812,0.00022540042,0.00026780725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753357,0.0042769234,0.0046117418,0.0010068212,0.00074171455,0.0018293037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022071756,0.00013803423,0.0004055069,0.0057513397,0.0009921115,0.002678036,0.00037167623,0.0004645585,0.0031549358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01438489,0.00015647858,0.0002791018,0.004844497,0.00087179337,0.0023384155,0.0023472302,0.0003856154,0.0004406359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031597583,0.000103534796,0.94797647,0.000097971504,0.00014018148,0.00021104848,0.0050135604,0.0006044516,0.0040431116,0.0046434547,0.00042513193,0.036425013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008489318,0.000063163374,0.98953396,0.000023108269,0.00002709619,0.00022855817,0.002678253,0.001175258,0.00040592864,0.0040206565,0.001818658,0.000016920565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092489214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020865977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99779284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000558996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000361694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011672795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414819347","doi":"10.1007/s12237-025-01616-y","title":"A Preliminary Investigation of Research Collaboration Through Scientific Paper Co-authorship in the Gulf of Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estuaries and Coasts","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley","keywords":"Politics; Bridge (graph theory); Fragmentation (computing); Natural (archaeology); Ecosystem","score_opus":0.44115211480198335,"score_gpt":0.5648879460509428,"score_spread":0.12373583124895948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414819347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989416,0.0006412016,0.00031751534,0.0007172535,0.000010682022,0.000032757544,0.0009084925,0.000006374501,0.007949618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691784,0.0006293987,0.00074826105,0.000036174755,0.000016275986,0.000050368053,0.00065640477,0.0000030412086,0.00094218133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.0002978309,0.00010299124,0.00013565057,0.00020769455,0.00018447841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848557,0.0065086316,0.005059314,0.0004517584,0.0025098193,0.00061472866],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025323685,0.00016516793,0.00021180334,0.008076373,0.0015410542,0.0024815884,0.00039421167,0.0004441593,0.0021008244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014001784,0.000078667705,0.00024184422,0.011718733,0.00058194937,0.0018911905,0.0015858285,0.0003555198,0.00014971814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007816465,0.00006962147,0.96649075,0.00016279172,0.000047692774,0.00031942053,0.008311568,0.00033193012,0.00029565755,0.0024839956,0.0008701203,0.020538306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011611215,0.00005827496,0.95455766,0.00019378508,0.00007209082,0.00017863269,0.03242187,0.00095711026,0.0003956161,0.0007480502,0.01039538,0.000009939936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049065158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056368534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99192363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025432706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022619222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097559154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414845510","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi.1795795","title":"Investigation of Studies on Micro-credentials by Bibliometric Analysis Method","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Quality (philosophy); Lifelong learning; Trend analysis","score_opus":0.5019674545803363,"score_gpt":0.6055027287630623,"score_spread":0.10353527418272601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414845510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6613214,0.15428683,0.030187592,0.0051633343,0.0007970011,0.005452881,0.024419982,0.00041255553,0.11795839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94547004,0.028010676,0.014747321,0.00039041849,0.00047203805,0.0029211491,0.0053356225,0.00004874266,0.002603988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742683,0.007296747,0.005714581,0.0017857411,0.010236421,0.00069828826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89467514,0.06759755,0.018412067,0.00408938,0.014076274,0.0011496897],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018678894,0.0005946593,0.0014878255,0.093286075,0.0012211732,0.006493094,0.0012888433,0.00076617266,0.0060406444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06988324,0.00025071495,0.0013391937,0.12197094,0.0012504458,0.004268289,0.0023593397,0.00045374766,0.0008444392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033665486,0.00033326194,0.47548994,0.0480265,0.0020387685,0.0014638767,0.011477555,0.0008332394,0.0019487081,0.0275899,0.0090865735,0.42137504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011396261,0.00057034154,0.7113124,0.020693095,0.0031637992,0.0030332163,0.045200795,0.0037130516,0.0058013857,0.018352153,0.18787882,0.00016693704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018560366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002750243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002184358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005927582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098784566},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415039865","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101448","title":"Inflation of the journal impact factor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering","keywords":"Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.5243463108771251,"score_gpt":0.66564752466554,"score_spread":0.14130121378841487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415039865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45663655,0.032423876,0.19199255,0.025956392,0.008317431,0.00059503573,0.013641562,0.0040340982,0.26640245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96578515,0.004335427,0.013563135,0.0013446333,0.0027507262,0.0002497706,0.0033294582,0.00047413362,0.008167585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783683,0.0041767736,0.0018009528,0.0025165386,0.01184502,0.0012923682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90940815,0.040017944,0.011963573,0.009212702,0.02749235,0.0019053476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013235402,0.00068770925,0.0009746737,0.011751804,0.0011369219,0.0047271913,0.00058151444,0.0009925866,0.0059639793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16305384,0.00039066383,0.0009428199,0.013575598,0.0017043119,0.0038802242,0.0026289457,0.0019133468,0.0037361619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008321618,0.00016152282,0.23385233,0.0012487512,0.0008234275,0.00061077805,0.0026229233,0.0047039906,0.0041830903,0.18138976,0.06152632,0.5080449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008084942,0.00054010394,0.5617897,0.0008077763,0.00037422238,0.0017658706,0.0018049874,0.012731929,0.007903324,0.24160841,0.17024077,0.0003520315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046021873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017032009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98824817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025051308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031433273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415055863","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v14n5p65","title":"Principles and Practices in National Rankings: Assessing the Alignment between the Berlin Principles and Brazil’s Folha University Ranking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Higher education; Compliance (psychology); Quality (philosophy); Journal ranking","score_opus":0.38501424463652717,"score_gpt":0.5885330728110877,"score_spread":0.20351882817456052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415055863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9003272,0.0012842416,0.020261155,0.008798468,0.00008833738,0.00044886285,0.0005317629,0.000055486053,0.0682044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939341,0.00015471914,0.0051001008,0.000118942655,0.00000721349,0.00009223736,0.000113562346,0.000009988461,0.000469214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96318763,0.016544748,0.0036397474,0.0022866474,0.012480041,0.0018612922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9264929,0.0348845,0.01655524,0.0063158367,0.013732654,0.002018761],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049172595,0.00023458048,0.00047921,0.005246551,0.002628997,0.0071625686,0.0008534925,0.00070433214,0.0009044631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1182215,0.00025943364,0.00031845947,0.009684251,0.0057298173,0.003888405,0.0044896696,0.0010972981,0.00010652766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011754603,0.00015106311,0.4861508,0.00078685884,0.0001563355,0.00025537275,0.10864242,0.0031063391,0.0020216708,0.19580206,0.003363459,0.19944614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027201162,0.0002787094,0.7289615,0.0013041133,0.00008886239,0.000252039,0.12263924,0.008487007,0.0022626051,0.061687432,0.073863015,0.0001482219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0350701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056844868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011005342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0221183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26005262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415078807","doi":"10.59350/a2td9-k5m27","title":"Did journal articles survive the last ten years?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Evergreen","score_opus":0.650205486005131,"score_gpt":0.5972889964329217,"score_spread":0.05291648957220929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415078807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28429085,0.08385398,0.0010501307,0.47405097,0.02949193,0.00006838191,0.00965181,0.00028373994,0.117258206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83801097,0.03588488,0.00070767914,0.044639748,0.02446243,0.00006577082,0.005095266,0.000452662,0.050680712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.0006762743,0.00063700025,0.0010609601,0.0024263165,0.0012175706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93175274,0.01197137,0.018231044,0.0031540524,0.020109586,0.014781209],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009167509,0.00034704627,0.000822413,0.0055803093,0.0028459786,0.0123678325,0.0011387055,0.0026203264,0.024775183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08231331,0.00029064206,0.0004589116,0.009439816,0.0029514958,0.011130233,0.0020587249,0.0034579637,0.010621534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007570904,0.00023349344,0.24865298,0.001413599,0.00048479135,0.0018475406,0.008499258,0.00013645619,0.0011377262,0.046122406,0.44207704,0.24863766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007220073,0.00022076826,0.27680713,0.0011721118,0.00019065438,0.002038124,0.014555151,0.0001786905,0.0008128147,0.024960667,0.67887545,0.00011618923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010799208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016036797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036014854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035740766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08288121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415106985","doi":"10.7554/elife.109042.1","title":"The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding—a replication study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Setback; Citation; Replicate; Robustness (evolution); Grant funding; Replication (statistics)","score_opus":0.7559407351846971,"score_gpt":0.6772689483475417,"score_spread":0.07867178683715537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415106985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789179,0.0013954247,0.009481488,0.0010119823,0.00024481004,0.00031268835,0.0018150542,0.0001628263,0.0066577448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636406,0.000050005518,0.0017909417,0.0001220944,0.00006151359,0.00014775297,0.0002604119,0.00003224506,0.001171061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.956042,0.026686452,0.0027171564,0.0064321156,0.0059564947,0.0021658058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64636225,0.18112653,0.0524386,0.09416628,0.020571055,0.0053352984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06544825,0.0006072987,0.001337973,0.0022790714,0.001767877,0.0022384492,0.0025589839,0.001549301,0.008236106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25092053,0.00042483394,0.0022962715,0.00341531,0.0027667142,0.0019834558,0.0034669999,0.0020747553,0.0008534937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034477029,0.00052368006,0.9278554,0.0005949363,0.0025203528,0.0005868527,0.006346886,0.0011432776,0.0014504507,0.008501155,0.0043417043,0.04268759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003360009,0.0012331731,0.97063947,0.00023425011,0.0015634452,0.00047287563,0.0028121744,0.0025008705,0.0022723111,0.00834257,0.009509281,0.00008353305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006268007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011985239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019406427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34612757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415107005","doi":"10.7554/elife.109042","title":"The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding—a replication study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Setback; Citation; Replicate; Robustness (evolution); Grant funding; Replication (statistics)","score_opus":0.7559407351846971,"score_gpt":0.6772689483475417,"score_spread":0.07867178683715537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415107005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789179,0.0013954247,0.009481488,0.0010119823,0.00024481004,0.00031268835,0.0018150542,0.0001628263,0.0066577448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636406,0.000050005518,0.0017909417,0.0001220944,0.00006151359,0.00014775297,0.0002604119,0.00003224506,0.001171061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.956042,0.026686452,0.0027171564,0.0064321156,0.0059564947,0.0021658058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64636225,0.18112653,0.0524386,0.09416628,0.020571055,0.0053352984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06544825,0.0006072987,0.001337973,0.0022790714,0.001767877,0.0022384492,0.0025589839,0.001549301,0.008236106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25092053,0.00042483394,0.0022962715,0.00341531,0.0027667142,0.0019834558,0.0034669999,0.0020747553,0.0008534937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034477029,0.00052368006,0.9278554,0.0005949363,0.0025203528,0.0005868527,0.006346886,0.0011432776,0.0014504507,0.008501155,0.0043417043,0.04268759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003360009,0.0012331731,0.97063947,0.00023425011,0.0015634452,0.00047287563,0.0028121744,0.0025008705,0.0022723111,0.00834257,0.009509281,0.00008353305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006268007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011985239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019406427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34612757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415154849","doi":"10.46747/cfp.7110e244","title":"Author ordering and citation-based measures of scholarly impact","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Family Physician","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health; McMaster University; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Rank (graph theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Convention; Citation analysis; Citation impact","score_opus":0.4584742008578115,"score_gpt":0.5016353420099522,"score_spread":0.0431611411521407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415154849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8639116,0.0047371504,0.058166414,0.0031733525,0.0006517437,0.0019360705,0.01616463,0.00041868622,0.05084036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97868,0.00043380947,0.01615609,0.00016231796,0.00015928716,0.0007070701,0.0028216788,0.0000433297,0.0008364181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.893333,0.03502138,0.02260045,0.0047548055,0.042140704,0.0021495512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42150572,0.3271774,0.14852849,0.027609883,0.07176841,0.00341012],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082202286,0.0006025249,0.0008710315,0.021268018,0.0017534805,0.0061924006,0.0020398458,0.0009017113,0.003069116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37218052,0.00040845372,0.001322193,0.03918595,0.003226871,0.005443636,0.0035053303,0.0011226374,0.00048030526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004540575,0.000156258,0.8880953,0.0017359437,0.0015742539,0.00007785318,0.004697546,0.0040227594,0.0009680991,0.017881662,0.0052740104,0.07506231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010034027,0.00042884686,0.9491941,0.00050194614,0.00046300422,0.00020805704,0.0035026204,0.006632688,0.0034551166,0.022434028,0.012807631,0.00027161595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014016036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024056345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058577918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006729052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43473244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415212644","doi":"10.4000/14xuz","title":"Relire les revues québécoises","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Institution; General interest; Periodization","score_opus":0.18297232167943475,"score_gpt":0.37487516280208144,"score_spread":0.1919028411226467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415212644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06770993,0.064871386,0.0011992586,0.0402213,0.004278271,0.00015214298,0.00074223103,0.00019134996,0.8206341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1710147,0.016727166,0.00058352895,0.0038892902,0.0003545167,0.00008187999,0.000299775,0.00011728129,0.8069318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980082,0.00035112633,0.00005417544,0.00022780211,0.0006879012,0.0006708746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743134,0.00034226844,0.00012796673,0.00017216682,0.0012600686,0.0006663282],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018011103,0.00069312996,0.0005066338,0.0033169328,0.013482399,0.0076022134,0.0011415771,0.001910486,0.030786674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003682954,0.00034982507,0.0004196601,0.0044289813,0.006785602,0.0037060096,0.0027827388,0.0025349134,0.0028952868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102281985,0.000071928545,0.0058920523,0.00057184976,0.000063740474,0.001180475,0.10223811,0.00031648335,0.0014592046,0.31692162,0.39463925,0.17654307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030509366,0.00000734908,0.0034932543,0.000150223,0.0000071506397,0.00006678169,0.008312111,0.00003722971,0.0001099469,0.0008286151,0.9869725,0.000011872249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93100774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99668306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047553997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061198402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34503007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415360119","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.155832.2","title":"Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Perception; Open science; Protocol (science); Open peer review; Massive open online course; Graduate students; Open data; Preprint","score_opus":0.9479692848096105,"score_gpt":0.7782260764395977,"score_spread":0.16974320837001278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415360119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99683446,0.00003068023,0.00020250613,0.00020775948,0.000033572054,0.0013894655,0.00010238394,0.000025991454,0.0011730974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98554647,0.00013839254,0.0021922605,0.0004587057,0.00005426326,0.007393886,0.00014901656,0.000016066888,0.004050881],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966209,0.0011160681,0.0002461213,0.00045136723,0.00056763133,0.0009978152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797717,0.008745777,0.0021336148,0.0014570409,0.003211302,0.004680482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009218694,0.0007046157,0.0016093135,0.0013470094,0.003377341,0.0017484972,0.0008391208,0.0015566954,0.011043314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980369,0.0011250087,0.0011197974,0.0007568875,0.0020266888,0.00164421,0.0016696039,0.0033491547,0.0019263192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011126577,0.2562801,0.13481764,0.002860149,0.00019980429,0.001436797,0.3033753,0.00034705258,0.017232608,0.0010064667,0.005235899,0.26608166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033250523,0.18801282,0.5906716,0.0007349728,0.00032304405,0.00028339442,0.18716222,0.000742183,0.008726355,0.0012705607,0.018488405,0.00025935262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025358314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00396594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015039882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004066577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04875368},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415488869","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2024","title":"Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Biomedical sciences; Human science; Impact factor","score_opus":0.3545117205238558,"score_gpt":0.5962054485031559,"score_spread":0.2416937279793001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415488869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95274293,0.029643064,0.0013808735,0.0024209665,0.0003453636,0.00014224974,0.002718015,0.000059585476,0.010547023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98935,0.0065102656,0.0012427702,0.00016979787,0.00047316914,0.00006098894,0.0010901131,0.000021456633,0.0010813591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822604,0.0042177024,0.0028025294,0.0010719087,0.009061912,0.0005854488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75561595,0.13766068,0.070908405,0.0049603623,0.02656133,0.0042932285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012887159,0.0003446169,0.00077973376,0.029795835,0.0013224096,0.004491159,0.00068536465,0.000867187,0.0030849986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13523759,0.00017990667,0.00067724974,0.04476687,0.0011303648,0.002826755,0.0021607245,0.0005964493,0.00062772265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485923,0.00006688426,0.94389075,0.0017236653,0.0004887418,0.000318213,0.0019376281,0.00024577076,0.0006993609,0.0012304585,0.0024068956,0.04684297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016809541,0.00014225513,0.983223,0.0006574687,0.0004507981,0.00075578655,0.0021708026,0.0011432456,0.0008873699,0.0010564494,0.009467247,0.000028825845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004396386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060908063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002017773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00306456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06815463},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415545158","doi":"10.59350/r4ve4-72d31","title":"A Gentle Introduction to Open Science","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Open science; Open source","score_opus":0.5769162129397973,"score_gpt":0.6528775600575992,"score_spread":0.07596134711780189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415545158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055000203,0.048933364,0.03490741,0.42104647,0.2636655,0.00027338698,0.0005694017,0.0018168824,0.22823745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010209302,0.05979443,0.025301628,0.19343078,0.22717099,0.0006222894,0.0006411111,0.0026247953,0.48020467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595624,0.0012563809,0.0002796154,0.00043035252,0.0017586158,0.00031885732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98638994,0.006277171,0.000430535,0.000875439,0.002919121,0.0031079187],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065310267,0.0011846924,0.0008094365,0.0027065652,0.004431985,0.00860091,0.0015794331,0.0057404838,0.07256104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02459145,0.00064737105,0.0011627293,0.0017820547,0.0052750753,0.0106470445,0.0065583563,0.01756949,0.052547857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010817799,0.000018514515,0.000053358857,0.00014145226,0.000003650532,0.00010037518,0.00025145648,0.00005831256,0.00014977326,0.038977437,0.91972536,0.040509485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029002806,0.000008818374,0.00006171374,0.00014162122,7.838808e-7,0.00013924685,0.0001084646,0.000026767362,0.00002342061,0.018474208,0.98100513,0.000006942114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014203314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036175528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024030965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036969483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24274087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415557426","doi":"10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-3/8","title":"Exploring state and institutional support for sustainable scholarly journal publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; National Research Foundation of Ukraine","keywords":"Publishing; Metadata; Sustainability; Work (physics); Thematic analysis; State (computer science); Publication; Scopus; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.753793795492117,"score_gpt":0.5918767500626817,"score_spread":0.1619170454294353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415557426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89097327,0.005240704,0.0033118112,0.017240342,0.00015141674,0.00017244082,0.0007625379,0.00013190854,0.08201558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686134,0.00084371865,0.0010061284,0.00016933892,0.000046227626,0.000063385254,0.0001693746,0.000015362803,0.00082511804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797921,0.009136429,0.0029799524,0.0013140732,0.0048281928,0.0019492821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8400248,0.08574644,0.042696055,0.0084804585,0.016748993,0.0063032475],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03408948,0.00019242997,0.00041122863,0.010978422,0.0025181535,0.014978937,0.0014592654,0.0008867106,0.004422947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1078348,0.000323492,0.00037707438,0.019641643,0.0037786413,0.008863325,0.006824637,0.0009319023,0.00033162907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028817292,0.0002803323,0.46966556,0.0031937067,0.000398328,0.00088975846,0.05918078,0.0016660991,0.0018517616,0.110934466,0.0060323467,0.34561867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009089283,0.00038729142,0.6811515,0.00461726,0.0003884177,0.00087729265,0.12992589,0.0026080206,0.0019113577,0.03293191,0.14495195,0.00015806855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039884555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00626812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98502105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053873262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129007595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18028456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415593269","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0335366","title":"Citation proximus: The role of social and semantic ties on citations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Consortium For Research and Innovation In Aerospace In Quebec; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Prestige; Citation; Centrality; Similarity (geometry); Diversity (politics); Citation analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.5616652540900196,"score_gpt":0.5165137099977491,"score_spread":0.0451515440922704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415593269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94930243,0.0097307,0.008954617,0.0033064443,0.00027517002,0.00006984486,0.0052118376,0.00023462652,0.022914225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949941,0.0010588327,0.0012293386,0.00008152781,0.00031090464,0.00003054134,0.0011520835,0.000032557007,0.0011102712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941894,0.0020008474,0.0007271178,0.0010476031,0.001614294,0.0004207858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9043686,0.06349724,0.018603517,0.004291624,0.005527144,0.003711871],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065029757,0.0005509479,0.00094295817,0.016717585,0.0020872212,0.0049180984,0.00091401825,0.0011061133,0.00596933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078062534,0.00021489654,0.0008912121,0.028013796,0.001621218,0.005398808,0.003487129,0.001267274,0.0012317542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037400037,0.00010965212,0.9092182,0.000943421,0.0011085208,0.00041058127,0.0025283555,0.0023077969,0.0008833255,0.016457548,0.0039625247,0.061695997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008342778,0.00023761467,0.88615537,0.0003984564,0.0010352485,0.0014023031,0.0026296221,0.0118488325,0.0016566709,0.07221906,0.022198606,0.00013472597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029587848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046871384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011638292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009966086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034391403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415675665","doi":"10.21627/15dgxd54","title":"It Is Time to Bring Scholarly Publishing Back to the Academic Community","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Reviews of Economic Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Academic community; Electronic publishing; Scholarly communication; Unintended consequences; Open access publishing; Access to information","score_opus":0.4978743413785195,"score_gpt":0.5478047137906095,"score_spread":0.049930372412089974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415675665","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064468355,0.025099713,0.004934725,0.8708365,0.09066116,0.00004882918,0.00007514585,0.00031111465,0.007388113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034629196,0.07953441,0.047852352,0.62549925,0.16844557,0.00043150672,0.00035451475,0.0016567765,0.041596428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.922459,0.027737185,0.007546243,0.003885697,0.03308353,0.0052882913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49747708,0.22066085,0.034067307,0.04688873,0.13658774,0.06431829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0939849,0.0014602038,0.0033584086,0.0070998566,0.013063492,0.07290433,0.005884521,0.033811297,0.037046913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37073866,0.0014697599,0.0026378601,0.009193512,0.019571511,0.0925895,0.02093834,0.05232838,0.03349638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021572327,0.0001854987,0.0006954905,0.002672867,0.00017461076,0.00066953397,0.004786473,0.00024429875,0.001069281,0.24558786,0.5905286,0.15316981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030405006,0.000077627614,0.0002817986,0.0013685314,0.000030252173,0.0002014427,0.0031671792,0.0000827082,0.0002541043,0.11071912,0.8837219,0.000064871616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029033287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039289636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92709565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009548786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035128914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49704564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415747150","doi":"10.1177/02666669251389935","title":"Involvement of China and its close partners in the international open access movement: Quantitative analysis and benchmarking approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Development","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); China; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Quarter (Canadian coin); Evaluation methods","score_opus":0.48051295636738117,"score_gpt":0.5793673417651911,"score_spread":0.09885438539780994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415747150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872442,0.00013539194,0.0011987902,0.00006417261,0.0000046555783,0.0000742164,0.00035095226,0.00000965064,0.010918009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803597,0.00006124537,0.0006779611,0.0000060636744,0.0000042394377,0.00008897258,0.00030909522,0.000002370641,0.0008141611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948179,0.0022059118,0.00043507124,0.000324123,0.0017005404,0.0005165032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719436,0.0065962938,0.0022222304,0.0006462056,0.002320993,0.0010199887],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00725888,0.00027411184,0.0004109443,0.013907257,0.000965674,0.0024243826,0.0004195971,0.00035437773,0.002246948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010833962,0.00010779701,0.00031583203,0.01995646,0.0010972715,0.0018654161,0.0023505376,0.00031213337,0.00016637128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014647318,0.00014065474,0.91792417,0.0001797988,0.00013352201,0.00025224875,0.012887212,0.0017193177,0.0010059866,0.006270121,0.0006116497,0.05872879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008439992,0.0002984794,0.9595032,0.0000611679,0.00005861633,0.00011545626,0.028898902,0.0050202017,0.0009787705,0.0012199056,0.003806193,0.000030793577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004230358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004988455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015047889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013573924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038389087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415777098","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/dmgex_v1","title":"Open Science, Closed Peer Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Publishing; Data sharing; Open data; Open science; Freedom of information; Identifiability","score_opus":0.851523223465649,"score_gpt":0.7155276012480258,"score_spread":0.13599562221762318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415777098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014317353,0.046613004,0.075932026,0.6347356,0.045949996,0.00053856533,0.00044729866,0.0010426397,0.18042366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5848907,0.040304545,0.059122544,0.18086234,0.07346048,0.0016044774,0.00053192186,0.0011598254,0.05806313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7653219,0.12889308,0.012563641,0.016765483,0.06992356,0.006532331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4358599,0.33114088,0.04520273,0.077401266,0.08132607,0.029069249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13720013,0.00060337834,0.0016597916,0.004370311,0.005986609,0.027141519,0.0030304675,0.013667502,0.015904622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47903544,0.00061605085,0.0008760585,0.005796794,0.030198181,0.032306433,0.012039416,0.009816869,0.006328649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016272244,0.00010075108,0.003449126,0.0018482751,0.00012499026,0.00028404413,0.0049140924,0.00036133657,0.0006347686,0.61622167,0.14758131,0.2243169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007988863,0.00010451377,0.0022379833,0.0017646838,0.000040145787,0.0005454136,0.00275548,0.00059206906,0.00056269363,0.56667256,0.42454767,0.00009698826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012914115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016156551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051100287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02038941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7255923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415886325","doi":"10.36591/se-4101-17","title":"Editor Decision Support Tools","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; White paper; Decision support system; Profiling (computer programming); Identification (biology); Associate editor; White (mutation); Percentile rank","score_opus":0.4304795340927844,"score_gpt":0.5844958447822689,"score_spread":0.15401631068948451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415886325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055146526,0.0060423734,0.04614573,0.15288289,0.17323533,0.005938124,0.077411294,0.047490623,0.4903022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011967445,0.008511882,0.06167593,0.064968005,0.095927425,0.010528594,0.046474297,0.023243243,0.6767032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782436,0.0072802063,0.0034411137,0.0027164142,0.006835495,0.0014832022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8714129,0.039507378,0.008345267,0.011368964,0.057193518,0.012172076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028007215,0.0030931353,0.003583509,0.0094533535,0.003377707,0.018885765,0.0071641183,0.0080931485,0.769478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14445461,0.0018158054,0.0021806238,0.0064048376,0.0012880733,0.010565373,0.007516846,0.0071875993,0.58936715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002778637,0.000008280298,0.00002490037,0.00022499653,0.000004607414,0.000019180414,0.000027875098,0.000022660348,0.000035841935,0.00069635327,0.9823825,0.01652499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003553095,0.000007073815,0.000034885477,0.00020639406,0.0000051933052,0.000015936423,0.000048210048,0.00011745633,0.00007021354,0.0015550178,0.9978911,0.000013005528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010074448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020235395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99054664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025898693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010369066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415899068","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09696-y","title":"Academic Cronyism and Publication in Journal Special Issues: an Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Tsinghua University","keywords":"Cronyism; Exploratory research; Reciprocal; Citation; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Publishing; Equity (law); Impact factor","score_opus":0.7124622079667812,"score_gpt":0.6626968449371432,"score_spread":0.049765363029637966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415899068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972306,0.00011124209,0.00024523083,0.0002714085,0.000010495265,0.000106199775,0.00005581853,0.0000032713301,0.0019658133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986174,0.0001281773,0.00046632736,0.00007570868,0.000030241406,0.00010424538,0.00005223159,0.0000055406636,0.00052013545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853136,0.008902176,0.0012055434,0.0009039016,0.0025693022,0.0011055132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882597,0.073778026,0.028397067,0.003653862,0.0056962566,0.0058777314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014861653,0.00026887143,0.00070879207,0.006779341,0.0039811865,0.0066116364,0.0010758989,0.0012805918,0.0041753524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063512646,0.00045696207,0.00032770642,0.008405268,0.0052953153,0.004745664,0.005579277,0.0018589392,0.00047837087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036432964,0.0018052369,0.5495525,0.0006299775,0.000073921095,0.002268491,0.41461068,0.00009594048,0.0013866916,0.0057380595,0.0011373027,0.022336869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004390805,0.00060840504,0.40087408,0.0003307997,0.000047300167,0.0011116993,0.5829329,0.0006662951,0.0007926226,0.002761153,0.009779577,0.000051277395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022116716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027220426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027561935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026827445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07859689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415963683","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05454-4","title":"Exploring citation behavior of national self-references","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; China Association for Science and Technology","keywords":"Scarcity; Diversification (marketing strategy); Citation; Norm (philosophy); Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Process (computing); Citation analysis","score_opus":0.9021341018802934,"score_gpt":0.6353747233350729,"score_spread":0.26675937854522047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415963683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99100566,0.0001755987,0.0005686479,0.00014174718,0.000006543025,0.0000054214984,0.0005645338,0.00003666934,0.007495252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656785,0.000076841956,0.00041285198,0.000011942941,0.0000070527285,0.0000064458427,0.00069463043,0.000018131337,0.0022043616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889934,0.00034454773,0.00010590539,0.0001990616,0.00034679848,0.00010441731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635546,0.020959722,0.004721275,0.0019393933,0.0077605597,0.001064414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023703226,0.00011919019,0.00028382626,0.0063826847,0.00073487323,0.0023863951,0.00054732565,0.0006233425,0.0048762504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04326629,0.00010425081,0.00030226796,0.0075296853,0.0003086978,0.002356679,0.00066653616,0.00042119774,0.001224519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025438546,0.00019494312,0.93018365,0.00011029612,0.00019401763,0.00015005836,0.0032045012,0.002825058,0.0028777155,0.011502825,0.0014056541,0.047096852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012512913,0.00016178317,0.9500718,0.000054749828,0.000113134534,0.00030107328,0.004258167,0.02874065,0.004006563,0.0061426414,0.006097842,0.000039068913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009201637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009480406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010499166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000598959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018296182},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415966073","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05467-z","title":"Research evaluation metrics comparison: does citation or citation context count differ from citation context similarity metric?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Weighting; Citation analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory)","score_opus":0.7775964114144409,"score_gpt":0.6498567782278969,"score_spread":0.12773963318654402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415966073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81174207,0.048769113,0.07335991,0.019115282,0.0022715083,0.0007466704,0.0030775948,0.0009116191,0.04000622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98413956,0.0013111489,0.011425906,0.00057730806,0.00043028055,0.00020954966,0.00083341845,0.0001231738,0.0009495544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9347349,0.035407633,0.0067157284,0.0042046863,0.017798252,0.0011388845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8224162,0.10953101,0.021889815,0.006789425,0.035630617,0.0037429743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050628886,0.0007435048,0.0016879282,0.011521197,0.0012331535,0.0075575807,0.0016035129,0.0019375068,0.0035014132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24436216,0.00024928266,0.0015274617,0.011020424,0.001426012,0.0098587,0.0019762225,0.0012125815,0.0013596099],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028041883,0.0006392432,0.44004852,0.0036433425,0.0046963035,0.0001361422,0.0021694996,0.0015087622,0.005488096,0.019430118,0.012318658,0.5071172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009307216,0.0060059275,0.7908117,0.0037021495,0.0077589066,0.0013146987,0.009493166,0.04774439,0.015264142,0.071262576,0.045303874,0.0004076596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017298713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027515434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030686785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26775432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023714","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23101","title":"Legislating Open Access: Making the Case for a Secondary Publishing Right in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Public access; Path (computing); Compliance (psychology); Human rights","score_opus":0.5186037205800953,"score_gpt":0.5866201866187247,"score_spread":0.06801646603862943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22520764,0.0034871697,0.009925281,0.31980014,0.0008938454,0.00037727054,0.0005890778,0.00018227125,0.43953738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208433,0.0013721543,0.005030779,0.029573567,0.00020361991,0.000105048006,0.00015772221,0.00008635535,0.04262736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96373826,0.0052759508,0.0012526142,0.0032971976,0.016774278,0.009661717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89488566,0.03272784,0.004112963,0.006222311,0.040819444,0.021231726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025629504,0.00024083453,0.00061672286,0.002535384,0.01863271,0.018107694,0.0030216172,0.0056568957,0.005506098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06957693,0.00047762413,0.00070444826,0.0040164213,0.017357918,0.0064383154,0.0073794383,0.007105344,0.0004083262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111854686,0.00008526848,0.016755674,0.00020596568,0.000051774852,0.00067188573,0.019169481,0.00096741813,0.001400767,0.85909003,0.038011376,0.063478425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019343867,0.000103096565,0.04082321,0.0010934504,0.00015922822,0.00031650823,0.024808658,0.0029328896,0.002594109,0.15079229,0.775887,0.00029617955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97994554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11495379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3693517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416167779","doi":"10.22330/001c.147268","title":"An Index of Her Own: An Investigation of the Proportion of Women Indexed in Evolutionary Psychology Textbooks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Ethology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Northumbria University","keywords":"Index (typography); Evolutionary psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Descriptive statistics; Gender bias","score_opus":0.45484510780618015,"score_gpt":0.5998921077014874,"score_spread":0.14504699989530723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416167779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95070595,0.018006757,0.0018031929,0.0022984832,0.000347698,0.00009975366,0.0035766438,0.00007035025,0.023091232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847424,0.0050828364,0.0011387245,0.0004961699,0.0003149273,0.00007377193,0.0016218014,0.00008540532,0.006443877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916311,0.0020792992,0.0010869803,0.0012186078,0.0036745744,0.0003094867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9188965,0.05033244,0.018123088,0.0031623626,0.0074183997,0.002067091],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009564236,0.0002699119,0.0009183909,0.012615638,0.0009167263,0.0040856125,0.000981631,0.00043605742,0.0055965926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096570544,0.00022067767,0.00041568198,0.018276466,0.0011329504,0.003530336,0.0021993238,0.0005212625,0.0010830273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054135494,0.00010945108,0.832056,0.0019079351,0.0008837116,0.00048391335,0.014528351,0.0001318937,0.00114078,0.002961955,0.010081966,0.13517274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059537724,0.00031955182,0.9197426,0.0011991858,0.0011447235,0.0020397333,0.016671784,0.0005379906,0.0018426346,0.0025624656,0.05381827,0.000061476414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002290928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003892467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000873977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010544509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050581098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416207390","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.056","title":"EVALUATION OF THE CONVERSION RATE OF ABSTRACTS AND “E-POSTERS” FROM THE 2016 CANADIAN ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION CONGRESS INTO SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Traumatology; Work (physics); Citation; Web of science; MEDLINE; Public health; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1827137128253735,"score_gpt":0.433249726845699,"score_spread":0.25053601402032555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416207390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987032,0.04150405,0.0026977502,0.002829536,0.0006702691,0.00348418,0.031151485,0.000297696,0.018661862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617879,0.01390893,0.0035992546,0.0004226703,0.0006835818,0.0025665911,0.013036644,0.00016021228,0.0038342616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.84915835,0.026054502,0.055253092,0.0057484573,0.06088599,0.0028996847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44011447,0.23946871,0.18128926,0.01871166,0.1156024,0.0048136082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08360813,0.000901985,0.001972287,0.057866383,0.001674353,0.00652228,0.0028495586,0.0012457662,0.008035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40782014,0.0005622775,0.00521092,0.06644083,0.0017312684,0.0039398265,0.0036307322,0.00095611624,0.0021987003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013979147,0.00025111943,0.91422254,0.0075920215,0.002064238,0.0006255109,0.0030407368,0.00025929793,0.00057753274,0.0004605448,0.004578361,0.064930096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013629891,0.00044285855,0.9799501,0.001506665,0.0012619242,0.0015271839,0.0027781297,0.0008594495,0.0007803749,0.00022859321,0.010449031,0.000079528385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01609971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012986005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99220604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077939774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007380284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44216734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416417179","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18110658","title":"The Rise of the Chaebol: A Bibliometric Analysis of Business Groups in South Korea","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Multinational corporation; Chaebol; Corporate group; Bibliometrics; International business","score_opus":0.1198007607569318,"score_gpt":0.4251282925885518,"score_spread":0.30532753183162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416417179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451698,0.03307755,0.0020515895,0.0025033734,0.00008368453,0.0002835724,0.004695424,0.00004314972,0.012091862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981743,0.012514858,0.0024128342,0.0001692799,0.000050891405,0.00012327419,0.0024564199,0.000012574458,0.0005168327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952022,0.0014117463,0.001122339,0.00042990287,0.0016362299,0.00019761852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98351157,0.007356307,0.0049061812,0.00045021067,0.003216104,0.00055967225],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045002038,0.00030655242,0.0007413455,0.058617365,0.0010161434,0.003978689,0.00043462138,0.0005259567,0.001047007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01707796,0.00018332654,0.0007497179,0.08126866,0.0007048905,0.0035041461,0.002228659,0.0004245273,0.00019255256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014907225,0.00010929442,0.74445456,0.010798779,0.0013507642,0.00090266246,0.013145755,0.00073403295,0.0023779653,0.0060310126,0.00467745,0.21526863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017989414,0.000094551295,0.92960876,0.0027451962,0.0013678775,0.0006521874,0.028183958,0.0020662036,0.0010932474,0.0020508098,0.032053433,0.00006570722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008241997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01667273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94138265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020959058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034232652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023799658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416544889","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.12134","title":"APC waivers and Ukraine's publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Institutional repository (Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Ukrainian; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Web of science; Period (music)","score_opus":0.36019456859411264,"score_gpt":0.417624501012277,"score_spread":0.05742993241816435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416544889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951982,0.00085584476,0.000089079236,0.00025403142,0.0000099001,0.0000042240626,0.00044808455,0.000010418227,0.0031302515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983285,0.00049234193,0.000052382617,0.000037019647,0.0000172116,0.0000041602643,0.00039339735,0.000005039819,0.0006698769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973062,0.0005032563,0.0004770503,0.00037643503,0.0010435976,0.0002933681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97161263,0.009217137,0.013346072,0.0009436839,0.0035479947,0.0013324713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027852685,0.00015496877,0.00037062238,0.004878984,0.0006794367,0.004353002,0.00042846403,0.00032207428,0.0017420497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020270992,0.00013177344,0.00024710823,0.009703975,0.0009120053,0.0020910525,0.002411433,0.0004173132,0.0005576714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020070851,0.000051010964,0.9608635,0.0001754903,0.00013688227,0.0005889465,0.005825688,0.00040840366,0.00045923228,0.0015595406,0.0008115372,0.028919114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054516872,0.000053665855,0.98751837,0.00005204768,0.000042166303,0.0002153756,0.006404607,0.0003178768,0.00067341153,0.000326096,0.0043797083,0.000011250778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010167585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076060817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99721473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017355037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002287947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020216823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416572938","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s544374","title":"Global Trends in Neurosurgical Nursing Research from 2014 to 2024: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Modalities; Visualization; Nursing research; Web of science; Citation; Nursing literature","score_opus":0.5223343024529562,"score_gpt":0.6799909173537998,"score_spread":0.1576566149008436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416572938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8631175,0.042986512,0.0044979868,0.0061859945,0.00022373663,0.00030905998,0.06280798,0.00057807117,0.01929322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558411,0.015875485,0.0054030926,0.0002406192,0.00020540525,0.00025981286,0.021329364,0.00006288911,0.0007822754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895509,0.0021083483,0.0031112558,0.00091969466,0.0038424982,0.00046725082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374837,0.031413,0.016614402,0.002249158,0.011184681,0.0010550005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011029059,0.0004351153,0.0010052822,0.10854248,0.0009639201,0.005198016,0.0006493791,0.00052574143,0.0016666037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04978258,0.00021098563,0.0012755073,0.19469288,0.00081386085,0.0038537448,0.0024996318,0.000508196,0.0004185989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137871,0.00005546381,0.8428423,0.005011078,0.0010889721,0.00036992985,0.004784856,0.001803723,0.0006440493,0.0046689343,0.008903167,0.1297137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002067981,0.0001038079,0.93282324,0.0020750437,0.00087812194,0.00087336067,0.009048072,0.004831832,0.0008811176,0.0027049144,0.04568575,0.00007405809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013133188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019059112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98897094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029481635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046969634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058327973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416610982","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.17518.r37491","title":"Referee report. For: What is a predatory journal? A scoping review [version 2; referees: 3 approved]","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.5906445318476334,"score_gpt":0.6109775974599683,"score_spread":0.020333065612334833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416610982","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073564675,0.007496912,0.0044509307,0.25724986,0.55464095,0.014685151,0.097839445,0.007141855,0.055759292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011294911,0.01168373,0.0130547155,0.21784762,0.16380943,0.03683343,0.054413613,0.0066120783,0.48445043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729465,0.005166274,0.0061124545,0.0020610145,0.0123306755,0.0013830315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56787264,0.06306062,0.0133309765,0.013804773,0.33368537,0.0082456395],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023256965,0.0023998807,0.0038342336,0.015061787,0.006056882,0.010203862,0.0048277397,0.015105431,0.5653635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3355329,0.0014169484,0.0048523215,0.012124377,0.0017126317,0.006675736,0.0072075767,0.0066793603,0.22780547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020808102,0.000009873151,0.000032579235,0.0010264064,0.000016059807,0.000035224773,0.00003137863,0.000007696671,0.00006501859,0.00013423892,0.99504036,0.003580256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047386897,0.00007203035,0.001946247,0.005977417,0.00019146713,0.00018507418,0.0003884862,0.00016340638,0.00047048027,0.0029641085,0.9869985,0.00016899235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015550173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025937889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5653635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008225207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017413946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61995614},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4416633903","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.159997.r234926","title":"Referee report. For: Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research [version 2; peer review: 5 approved]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"The Internet; Peer review; Access to information; Public access; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.88718950269657,"score_gpt":0.719627061075853,"score_spread":0.1675624416207171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416633903","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038788404,0.003141681,0.0016033172,0.41316634,0.52854484,0.0019311693,0.018716112,0.002652846,0.029855862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010750124,0.006425127,0.0052749636,0.350543,0.20710884,0.0054412126,0.0152108,0.0025425095,0.39670345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762117,0.0035359275,0.0027038602,0.0019874,0.014203117,0.0013579535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62352383,0.06857316,0.0071827057,0.012396898,0.27959013,0.008733174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021383112,0.001739048,0.0023948972,0.008914442,0.006759131,0.008186303,0.0051499032,0.01780976,0.43812406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27519888,0.0009861854,0.003356604,0.009134382,0.002097091,0.005449027,0.006175017,0.008360568,0.21296124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007505002,0.0000056814933,0.000029223615,0.00009315818,0.0000039705487,0.000021023883,0.000017229786,0.0000045487977,0.000035750894,0.000118791686,0.9979558,0.0017072527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012575684,0.000037879767,0.002524557,0.0007572642,0.00007013527,0.00015212894,0.0004252873,0.00016956017,0.00034487408,0.0019268487,0.99335396,0.000111737754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030637098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048601273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008394147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015521424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8014478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416633904","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.159997.r234928","title":"Referee report. For: Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research [version 2; peer review: 5 approved]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"The Internet; Peer review; Access to information; Public access; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.88718950269657,"score_gpt":0.719627061075853,"score_spread":0.1675624416207171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416633904","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038788404,0.003141681,0.0016033172,0.41316634,0.52854484,0.0019311693,0.018716112,0.002652846,0.029855862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010750124,0.006425127,0.0052749636,0.350543,0.20710884,0.0054412126,0.0152108,0.0025425095,0.39670345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762117,0.0035359275,0.0027038602,0.0019874,0.014203117,0.0013579535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62352383,0.06857316,0.0071827057,0.012396898,0.27959013,0.008733174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021383112,0.001739048,0.0023948972,0.008914442,0.006759131,0.008186303,0.0051499032,0.01780976,0.43812406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27519888,0.0009861854,0.003356604,0.009134382,0.002097091,0.005449027,0.006175017,0.008360568,0.21296124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007505002,0.0000056814933,0.000029223615,0.00009315818,0.0000039705487,0.000021023883,0.000017229786,0.0000045487977,0.000035750894,0.000118791686,0.9979558,0.0017072527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012575684,0.000037879767,0.002524557,0.0007572642,0.00007013527,0.00015212894,0.0004252873,0.00016956017,0.00034487408,0.0019268487,0.99335396,0.000111737754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030637098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048601273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008394147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015521424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8014478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416794742","doi":"","title":"Les revues scientifiques à l’épreuve du capitalisme académique : le cas d’une revue classée en sciences de gestion","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.24520878825290415,"score_gpt":0.45073043982805955,"score_spread":0.2055216515751554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416794742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20410462,0.024682635,0.0057631102,0.23765543,0.004532224,0.00005869834,0.0003071209,0.00016303649,0.5227331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362161,0.0068711257,0.0021617264,0.0039391285,0.0037727666,0.00008194287,0.00011949104,0.00014433799,0.046693403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085165,0.005702961,0.0006501666,0.0016466158,0.008037415,0.0031112782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220429,0.05129097,0.00495588,0.0045275744,0.011382299,0.005800451],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018572824,0.0005657794,0.00093491573,0.006501444,0.0108638145,0.030705461,0.0017625482,0.0078272745,0.019077636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06075985,0.0004949772,0.0012778698,0.007837888,0.01696765,0.01812281,0.005591333,0.009106939,0.001969534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002632343,0.000111156085,0.0059531364,0.00022766479,0.00005736801,0.0007105124,0.015175655,0.000572667,0.00055895536,0.91397464,0.017579868,0.04481522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013210488,0.00011214151,0.03077206,0.0006211761,0.000053684562,0.0008068924,0.02039467,0.0024840315,0.0016210305,0.29543403,0.6474311,0.00013706322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05377796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03592259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99349856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02382012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01902617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17282784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416852871","doi":"10.59350/6e6rb-tx842","title":"Regional Feature: Canada's Leadership in Diamond Open Access","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Access to information; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8813629746207113,"score_gpt":0.6315672608982018,"score_spread":0.24979571372250953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416852871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007805507,0.0023740872,0.001810609,0.13241461,0.03709079,0.0006533296,0.018589944,0.0043120948,0.79494905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019616038,0.0005979237,0.0009101159,0.0104876,0.0013260521,0.000047108355,0.0028019205,0.0005457129,0.9636675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772877,0.000047588823,0.000027810673,0.00018923129,0.0013382755,0.00066831603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893156,0.00031450664,0.00012320615,0.0002313277,0.0046685785,0.0053466815],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017113767,0.00047881115,0.0004152184,0.0011082507,0.006004347,0.008165936,0.0013847887,0.0031569565,0.23208216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035451876,0.00033595267,0.00044905426,0.0013845664,0.001654707,0.0018124267,0.0025790697,0.0032367676,0.046380397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016026286,0.000007342009,0.00019859616,0.000025770607,0.0000011175904,0.0000773446,0.000046266738,0.000021200565,0.00025202782,0.0012543334,0.9927135,0.0053863623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840938,0.000008418749,0.0017893442,0.000021867749,0.0000017763498,0.00004257247,0.00021949518,0.00005307029,0.00018828998,0.00020053939,0.997451,0.000011839053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7534863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91066104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01597227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074024685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77639216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416852874","doi":"10.59350/bpmd7-jjp45","title":"Regional Feature: Canada's Leadership in Diamond Open Access","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Access to information; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8813629746207113,"score_gpt":0.6315672608982018,"score_spread":0.24979571372250953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416852874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007805507,0.0023740872,0.001810609,0.13241461,0.03709079,0.0006533296,0.018589944,0.0043120948,0.79494905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019616038,0.0005979237,0.0009101159,0.0104876,0.0013260521,0.000047108355,0.0028019205,0.0005457129,0.9636675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772877,0.000047588823,0.000027810673,0.00018923129,0.0013382755,0.00066831603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893156,0.00031450664,0.00012320615,0.0002313277,0.0046685785,0.0053466815],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017113767,0.00047881115,0.0004152184,0.0011082507,0.006004347,0.008165936,0.0013847887,0.0031569565,0.23208216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035451876,0.00033595267,0.00044905426,0.0013845664,0.001654707,0.0018124267,0.0025790697,0.0032367676,0.046380397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016026286,0.000007342009,0.00019859616,0.000025770607,0.0000011175904,0.0000773446,0.000046266738,0.000021200565,0.00025202782,0.0012543334,0.9927135,0.0053863623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011840938,0.000008418749,0.0017893442,0.000021867749,0.0000017763498,0.00004257247,0.00021949518,0.00005307029,0.00018828998,0.00020053939,0.997451,0.000011839053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7534863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91066104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01597227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074024685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77639216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417026961","doi":"10.20944/preprints202512.0523.v1","title":"Publication Patterns in Engineering: A Quantitative Comparison of Open Access and Subscription-Based Journals","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Scopus; Quartile; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Homogeneous; Dominance (genetics); Citation","score_opus":0.8814856229519147,"score_gpt":0.6870904937202651,"score_spread":0.1943951292316496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417026961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823255,0.0029191026,0.0019257489,0.00041773057,0.0000478591,0.000044819513,0.0030344818,0.00010654481,0.009178104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482745,0.00092032325,0.0009372684,0.00004847578,0.00010661707,0.000029704574,0.0021187477,0.00003649845,0.0009749814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898796,0.001329993,0.0021868055,0.0008363873,0.0052140253,0.00055316923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90238464,0.03802692,0.039280534,0.0037882093,0.013125135,0.003394524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062232884,0.00028031733,0.0007233439,0.028371414,0.00054462167,0.0045570135,0.00072256604,0.00060797716,0.0024289663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052055918,0.00019586229,0.0005304959,0.052343853,0.0007621479,0.004379261,0.001985611,0.00036306237,0.0012935073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023784666,0.00006725787,0.95508176,0.0003852857,0.00026034008,0.00014257297,0.0015658183,0.0005224923,0.0017968263,0.001037279,0.0008386699,0.038063962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008864364,0.00012499106,0.99328136,0.00005096893,0.000046496203,0.00037089243,0.0013630677,0.00055907114,0.0004878296,0.0007747801,0.0029109349,0.000020684814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001187656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013913977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99377674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006111608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008143954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032912314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417049201","doi":"10.1097/bsd.0000000000001994","title":"The 100 Top-cited Articles on Cervical Spine Surgery","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cervical spine; MEDLINE; Cervical vertebrae; Foundation (evidence); Clinical Practice","score_opus":0.5775149705960011,"score_gpt":0.5899762524411751,"score_spread":0.012461281845174033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417049201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7480305,0.05033796,0.009257764,0.001904568,0.00055765285,0.013340203,0.14106227,0.0009799688,0.034529176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929099,0.023305826,0.027975919,0.0003764259,0.0007095557,0.014797432,0.035333477,0.00019478906,0.004396676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98550224,0.0021708254,0.0042376798,0.0012230565,0.0062653315,0.0006008148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95344883,0.02076441,0.010939529,0.0010244773,0.01275696,0.001065775],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009507004,0.0013162531,0.0032508608,0.16607128,0.0017658839,0.004313111,0.0013506314,0.00089845626,0.009330798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061029974,0.0004833332,0.0033119614,0.13676356,0.00083066104,0.0029019434,0.0025889112,0.00047421354,0.0028385955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019545394,0.0006658727,0.5246404,0.057213377,0.004585513,0.0013377925,0.0028634472,0.0020654222,0.00430086,0.0026430746,0.026722955,0.37100676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000578662,0.00088336866,0.9037151,0.007884033,0.008383143,0.002804982,0.0070917667,0.00546569,0.005186016,0.0037515122,0.053993516,0.0002622953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003682597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044945357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8339287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00349559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056165284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050278425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417081655","doi":"10.59350/3p77p-6vz25","title":"25 Years of Open Source &amp;amp; Open Access: An interview with Silvio Carvalho Neto","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Key (lock); Open source","score_opus":0.8420053937708964,"score_gpt":0.6610692611193921,"score_spread":0.18093613265150432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417081655","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012010512,0.005280235,0.0010275457,0.95770687,0.002817882,0.000053934746,0.000049961993,0.00003163348,0.021021439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32205662,0.012883688,0.002414476,0.58680254,0.0043917107,0.0004316282,0.000078134704,0.00069157453,0.070249714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574374,0.026847504,0.00076030474,0.0016669973,0.00903729,0.0042505837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984573,0.06914365,0.0024640015,0.0019841809,0.0080936905,0.019857125],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04127493,0.00048203304,0.0010142124,0.0018965481,0.02280048,0.0143874325,0.0018195732,0.010486939,0.004937793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066455536,0.000985881,0.0005379897,0.0037608102,0.02069671,0.018780854,0.013689021,0.022065887,0.0011314863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005966422,0.00015725142,0.0016548088,0.00019786012,0.000010744206,0.0016984052,0.3854201,0.00012186624,0.00087181584,0.09029385,0.50095296,0.01856061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006548533,0.000021844606,0.0009544744,0.00032597678,0.000002794358,0.0003163217,0.12545085,0.000120059885,0.00015708509,0.0042344527,0.86835563,0.000053921012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026886718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035024915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99818045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013747713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01686518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21828532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417340277","doi":"10.18438/eblip30721","title":"Scoping Review of Transformative Agreement Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Citation; Benchmarking; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; Workflow; Publishing; Mainstream","score_opus":0.5011623168686118,"score_gpt":0.610246223362673,"score_spread":0.10908390649406119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417340277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012515957,0.97875357,0.0034032967,0.0040530944,0.0014884714,0.002355271,0.000924301,0.000052000236,0.0077184252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014773367,0.9722892,0.0044707423,0.0014585064,0.00047927533,0.0042903274,0.0013470553,0.00003813891,0.00085324276],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.91854376,0.03517071,0.027018566,0.003896899,0.014066313,0.001303768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71458346,0.2192432,0.019525861,0.009029545,0.03610659,0.0015113216],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07356555,0.0022009758,0.0053838626,0.048634898,0.0030436057,0.009991939,0.0039314297,0.00499613,0.008996955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25460887,0.0017744435,0.0050211283,0.04585574,0.0048888074,0.008575454,0.006306211,0.0036289678,0.0019137264],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015578097,0.000063344,0.00091031083,0.69909984,0.0020485981,0.0004372362,0.004597273,0.00051203376,0.00035957838,0.015823442,0.01869504,0.25729758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002805248,0.000057420417,0.00084994663,0.8764325,0.0019001615,0.00023851455,0.0021755677,0.00010954945,0.0002489227,0.004533116,0.11339533,0.000030976582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006372643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092648305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99000806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009932638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043619037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38905644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46055585","doi":"","title":"Ontario Research Commercialization Program","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œopen source business resource","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Business","score_opus":0.6793764034985403,"score_gpt":0.6065733378517199,"score_spread":0.07280306564682049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46055585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00708441,0.0012884069,0.00077147875,0.010901867,0.00061568216,0.0006717506,0.046760302,0.00090464944,0.9310015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007812481,0.00072866026,0.0008605883,0.000510662,0.000059662307,0.0001553446,0.008998552,0.00013490679,0.9807391],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425536,0.00023533581,0.00012821934,0.00043207713,0.0039790375,0.00096999074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855289,0.0005773107,0.00027720243,0.0009104665,0.009785417,0.0029207617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028387792,0.00079327275,0.0008556829,0.0065707327,0.005693833,0.004778058,0.0016491283,0.0012319256,0.3351423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060905614,0.00073806837,0.0007129629,0.004928505,0.001148936,0.0011505521,0.0021360707,0.0011978579,0.09673115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115118826,0.00007131693,0.0025947304,0.0001346167,0.00001032112,0.00007930918,0.00014264439,0.000071681105,0.0004035465,0.009566824,0.94171226,0.045097627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034365403,0.000018471506,0.012335313,0.00003372438,0.000009224024,0.00004856959,0.00018552426,0.0003070568,0.0004317165,0.00047015614,0.98611397,0.0000119748565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8050321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94098884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03707079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12734707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565775252","doi":"","title":"The Structures, Purpose and Funding of Academic Research Networks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.30958139827705083,"score_gpt":0.4584283362082118,"score_spread":0.14884693793116094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565775252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8254312,0.005505039,0.027935268,0.008127773,0.00008619027,0.00020856307,0.0018874485,0.00018549047,0.130633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987599,0.0015181841,0.0057707964,0.00010650703,0.00009024587,0.00013140656,0.0005378376,0.000031057036,0.0042148605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853955,0.0073164944,0.0009760365,0.0011338473,0.0036998095,0.0014782883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8725892,0.071090244,0.026753204,0.0054972884,0.016273482,0.0077966237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009538644,0.00025193344,0.00047955633,0.015299306,0.0029636994,0.009430185,0.001359204,0.0015630673,0.0032395269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094659366,0.0005326193,0.00036942304,0.015071192,0.0035943063,0.007693521,0.0032756035,0.0007074721,0.00097611593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029173974,0.000121102385,0.3932916,0.00047136768,0.000202339,0.00030893538,0.018011633,0.009452666,0.003704042,0.40246174,0.0050349617,0.16664787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116558265,0.00018637552,0.5449817,0.0008193722,0.0002612521,0.000863958,0.016557315,0.0248152,0.0023306608,0.29420128,0.11472276,0.0001435296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011904658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017773455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99046135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068344083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052531646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050445795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W596669352","doi":"10.5334/bbd.c","title":"How to Choose a Journal: Scientific and Practical Considerations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ubiquity Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7564742860492906,"score_gpt":0.5740717458064264,"score_spread":0.18240254024286418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W596669352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065929204,0.054710764,0.005233945,0.8203991,0.03461622,0.00007647914,0.0002032142,0.00028108555,0.08381991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03568332,0.1876417,0.046592724,0.420634,0.12294083,0.00042469276,0.000610921,0.0014516895,0.18402013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851614,0.0042935587,0.0013814133,0.00093368464,0.0075422283,0.0006876504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84163475,0.1008414,0.0031633272,0.0037692387,0.029372474,0.021218814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03553974,0.0009823827,0.0017976707,0.0045281653,0.0069482224,0.03305709,0.003685077,0.01758194,0.05128345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14755297,0.0007881735,0.00092831627,0.0049902494,0.007894737,0.02959731,0.004127791,0.017625967,0.04205112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022286615,0.00005684323,0.0003569659,0.00046541708,0.000016062217,0.00024439846,0.00040296084,0.000086341366,0.00018161042,0.053631097,0.82484376,0.11969229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027118136,0.000028748585,0.0006287083,0.0016514374,0.0000206821,0.0011301999,0.0014128477,0.00018303827,0.0001421389,0.07877604,0.9159193,0.00007975314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017121361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073540057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96446025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027062139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010387555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1879543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W601886334","doi":"","title":"Relationship among Economic Growth, Internet Usage and Publication Productivity: Comparison among ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and World’s Best Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Citation; China; Business; Product (mathematics); Political science; Economics; Economic growth; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.1749007373404471,"score_gpt":0.42097202050621246,"score_spread":0.24607128316576538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W601886334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898323,0.0032792932,0.0001530905,0.0005520514,0.000024996605,0.00000873609,0.0017982707,0.000017095663,0.0043342044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954094,0.0019803478,0.00019224655,0.000039828352,0.000040522744,0.000011486755,0.0015000203,0.0000065594522,0.0008196142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999086,0.00018546266,0.00021959639,0.00009694449,0.00032106714,0.00009080831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588216,0.0045258305,0.0059873178,0.00035276107,0.0020879433,0.0011640043],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016608839,0.00018287296,0.00025086105,0.005686624,0.00032016213,0.001714418,0.0002528522,0.00022213427,0.0025018132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063658166,0.000093145136,0.00043464356,0.00843859,0.00029188054,0.0011953885,0.0006116332,0.00035917704,0.0004019917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398522,0.000032885993,0.9875981,0.00009223193,0.00011258615,0.00021832889,0.00021941053,0.00014718788,0.00010851442,0.00012165794,0.000608118,0.010706945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019712443,0.000027351854,0.9971185,0.00003943117,0.000033349912,0.00023600561,0.00063920824,0.00033348813,0.000084732215,0.00007340974,0.0014072777,0.0000053334115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002869121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037926263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99431336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040394088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055952795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008783698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610159414","doi":"","title":"The Political and Moral Economies of Science: A Case Study of Genomics in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political economy; Moral economy; Economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.18655461216141977,"score_gpt":0.3776869926487014,"score_spread":0.19113238048728165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610159414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8645494,0.0067587183,0.0015707522,0.039861962,0.0002372739,0.00029071877,0.0003769852,0.000034822315,0.086319305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802484,0.00282076,0.0015437104,0.0044962983,0.000029301456,0.000053101772,0.00009458509,0.000032259984,0.010681523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912442,0.0030250268,0.00018245578,0.0004559622,0.0019569402,0.0031354087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896768,0.0046043443,0.0004936206,0.00020276617,0.0024421348,0.002580303],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004170961,0.0004984183,0.00068742357,0.002725045,0.04975072,0.009058709,0.0033861864,0.007688088,0.003250144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637798,0.0003887561,0.00058634806,0.007291324,0.013918947,0.0025825668,0.0054768454,0.0048227,0.00029689624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030983312,0.0005109642,0.055624694,0.0006512753,0.00009069244,0.080633566,0.6031702,0.0035870785,0.0019141259,0.16523847,0.03964915,0.048619937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000366005,0.000068314665,0.027192699,0.0004735892,0.000048270565,0.0024185688,0.83461684,0.0016485547,0.0005418737,0.0045915674,0.12825413,0.00010897481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98909914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99727494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16671912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1328495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614075352","doi":"10.21225/d53595","title":"Implications of Open Access Journals for Professional Associations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.5662083590230127,"score_gpt":0.6122572001089457,"score_spread":0.04604884108593299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614075352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046168923,0.0048632654,0.00062143203,0.74906504,0.0072229626,0.0001055045,0.0009835883,0.000115449024,0.19085383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7064482,0.006330422,0.0023684404,0.20974237,0.011221953,0.00033574752,0.00064199185,0.00015125851,0.062759705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626767,0.012359909,0.0029421444,0.0020522464,0.015296455,0.0046725054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47866255,0.3311391,0.032423753,0.015033309,0.09180761,0.05093379],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033036575,0.00032199168,0.00071420934,0.0036883957,0.007976437,0.014532554,0.0028593089,0.010467693,0.10408502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34238327,0.0003768965,0.00090908416,0.005226302,0.0058143036,0.013716191,0.0051949914,0.0053456537,0.006838782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022773936,0.000510309,0.048036598,0.0016405358,0.0001273956,0.001650282,0.0044957907,0.0005179494,0.00077115634,0.25845912,0.48988572,0.19162768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009432584,0.00046331913,0.117453426,0.0052277064,0.0002991667,0.0019437014,0.024075467,0.0011677338,0.0015701099,0.22111997,0.6255114,0.00022476514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02762844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04248797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007091478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02225098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34819913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63788921","doi":"","title":"The open access (OA) advantage: evidence for preferential citation of open access articles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology and Health Care","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8839307933496937,"score_gpt":0.755509902661279,"score_spread":0.12842089068841467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63788921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528029,0.023594305,0.006237501,0.016160168,0.0009245683,0.00011585369,0.0030990622,0.00011212617,0.09695354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328506,0.0027517602,0.0007520061,0.0008800134,0.0006999721,0.000022452508,0.00044852932,0.00002381718,0.0011364422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777215,0.007690025,0.0039424854,0.0022012203,0.00687463,0.0015700739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4191223,0.4269641,0.093358584,0.025964035,0.021573791,0.0130172195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02318569,0.0004899344,0.0012038791,0.010034111,0.0018345062,0.0066004465,0.0020172708,0.0022006335,0.0163109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25474295,0.00030315891,0.0014224504,0.017544061,0.004243966,0.0068509993,0.004280462,0.0017991969,0.00079891796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044735707,0.00040765334,0.81387585,0.003261645,0.0035785334,0.0009956253,0.0030011297,0.00058367284,0.0014799045,0.04973461,0.008321669,0.11028617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011082507,0.0010440239,0.78766006,0.0013064295,0.004375505,0.003090091,0.0056225043,0.0013707365,0.002695296,0.16283257,0.028768169,0.00012639142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038461597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038547867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99798274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009777886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00305505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12261909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886123307","doi":"10.1453/jepe.v1i2.112","title":"From the Editor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KSP Journals - Journal of Economics Bibliography","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Editorial board; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.4241383101638885,"score_gpt":0.5062122997337095,"score_spread":0.08207398956982104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886123307","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035514843,0.011657904,0.0006638122,0.11792966,0.81297016,0.00007649538,0.00042227583,0.0005088773,0.05541566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005527604,0.016772287,0.00093913317,0.13114685,0.41325578,0.00011330489,0.00075734494,0.0005027793,0.43098488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757797,0.00037192847,0.00024387793,0.000495694,0.0010483408,0.0002622636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869398,0.0015166419,0.0005769659,0.00067360484,0.007416388,0.0028766303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019290872,0.0015104997,0.0010182651,0.0017385954,0.0018265358,0.0065181497,0.0023603803,0.005181814,0.2744078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019839525,0.0004945589,0.0008157997,0.0010241697,0.00096797233,0.004622823,0.0026235376,0.006622767,0.18080817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015410305,0.000008909916,0.00005486668,0.00009785792,0.0000026370437,0.000095178875,0.000016423219,0.0000101724745,0.000056889814,0.00044882894,0.98074603,0.018446889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047028648,0.000009213559,0.00010350675,0.00012136577,0.0000024462306,0.0002691747,0.000043272317,0.000015824937,0.000060446044,0.0003113887,0.99905354,0.000005139986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008161515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015875674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2744078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016466532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003450763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91798556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886146868","doi":"10.14662/ijalis2015.033","title":"ARABIAN ONLINE OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS : A STUDY ON DOAJ","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFM-OAR (INFN Catania)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Subject (documents); Developing country; Access to information; Developed country; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.9637856923124178,"score_gpt":0.7722875945843289,"score_spread":0.1914980977280889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886146868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99334794,0.00068924454,0.000035630987,0.0005006691,0.000017122988,0.000032608208,0.00034331816,0.0000028907143,0.0050305575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966863,0.0012166486,0.00009729054,0.00028094772,0.000039682127,0.000027280537,0.0002792704,0.000004028775,0.0013686346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976058,0.00058370706,0.00033847612,0.0001887383,0.00096325675,0.00031995767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982486,0.005849085,0.0065446547,0.00033437394,0.0030156428,0.0017703002],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021951695,0.00021512288,0.00029338346,0.0062942933,0.0016908097,0.0032930763,0.00047925682,0.00049768365,0.0057616066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013234393,0.00018415347,0.0001790785,0.014541228,0.000788996,0.0026702336,0.0012192979,0.0004219279,0.0010549356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020609167,0.0005472736,0.88259786,0.00097575615,0.00004492084,0.0028471237,0.057129156,0.000029154182,0.0010547593,0.0018996026,0.0032996202,0.049368672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013986619,0.00016610243,0.79105896,0.00027219552,0.000026553662,0.0018728013,0.17856587,0.00007239895,0.0003933334,0.0002728532,0.027260711,0.000024280069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043652514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052979356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011349239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017984872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019274473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6888828565","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2027238.1460","title":"The Co-authorship Network and Citation Analysis of Health Knowledge Management Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Health care; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Health management system; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Citation impact","score_opus":0.8926591498591072,"score_gpt":0.7794451223742003,"score_spread":0.11321402748490694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6888828565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319729,0.006962296,0.010623598,0.0022589366,0.00015651534,0.00022202416,0.004905574,0.000095556716,0.042802535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914938,0.0013651012,0.0038750155,0.000042926986,0.00008145653,0.00013254827,0.0013466121,0.000019644203,0.0016428767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832546,0.00682074,0.0029181805,0.001319051,0.0046839067,0.0010035605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8333536,0.118114375,0.025230734,0.004904665,0.01596335,0.00243331],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015493715,0.00035143978,0.0007132874,0.050803665,0.0019213138,0.006110421,0.00080128794,0.0007938074,0.005078071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1286297,0.00014860251,0.0006845216,0.06511563,0.0010814571,0.004808098,0.0027694246,0.00053328194,0.00077732455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017878923,0.000076235396,0.85066134,0.0010139315,0.00037954032,0.00040802328,0.008820837,0.0020286744,0.00066454103,0.015122317,0.0033470034,0.11729866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030211555,0.00015817152,0.87357455,0.0012243156,0.00057766563,0.001777535,0.024485383,0.02287187,0.0028698908,0.035659235,0.036660872,0.00011026429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036882772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043702987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023144765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035141457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08193958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889244635","doi":"10.25547/kp0a-9630","title":"Recommandations politiques pour le libre accès aux données de recherche en Europe (RECODE)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Textual Cultures Lab","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Order (exchange); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.6224377247633078,"score_gpt":0.5920105115187804,"score_spread":0.030427213244527462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889244635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044824295,0.022640752,0.055318285,0.545486,0.035064735,0.004918537,0.014480393,0.0036463172,0.31396255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048868265,0.02594133,0.31216928,0.33769193,0.018651532,0.04586763,0.030794382,0.0040924093,0.17592321],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5330858,0.1900506,0.103620775,0.014526538,0.14066873,0.018047547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28867117,0.4182881,0.04109564,0.06676867,0.17384228,0.0113342125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.34103128,0.0020965652,0.0038835744,0.025828967,0.010232852,0.04912866,0.009567538,0.049418718,0.023647891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5601731,0.006155121,0.00714608,0.020090897,0.016692873,0.021742268,0.020475963,0.042422302,0.032460254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041001022,0.00041059617,0.002332151,0.00380883,0.00024609294,0.0005842556,0.0044086766,0.0005746126,0.0019645088,0.28216863,0.6365064,0.06658521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020433604,0.00011802876,0.00468096,0.008143814,0.0002884644,0.00040217987,0.0014290746,0.00049776817,0.0018080784,0.03580352,0.94639385,0.00022989877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03646962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027968295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99043244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014748597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07213076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81262577},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6891857844","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1602.07396","title":"Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Measure (data warehouse); Duration (music); Grant funding; Basic research","score_opus":0.8029701652265703,"score_gpt":0.493680286312782,"score_spread":0.3092898789137883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6891857844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94419545,0.0042109117,0.01561321,0.0038598164,0.00003266221,0.00009658122,0.0005285125,0.00028671877,0.031176245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655944,0.0007991577,0.0009484324,0.00013347612,0.000033827764,0.000024959594,0.0000722506,0.000016771355,0.0014115942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440324,0.0019685943,0.00035315487,0.0009702072,0.0011853816,0.0011193636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8791851,0.0795883,0.026081903,0.005120968,0.0057579665,0.004265795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077332254,0.0005291808,0.0018138093,0.005164004,0.0009640051,0.0058596553,0.0011927646,0.001668721,0.007040552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07328188,0.00051401823,0.00094716187,0.005854652,0.005363955,0.0033176327,0.0026635893,0.0011762057,0.0011240098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016921832,0.0004195685,0.5862436,0.0015713224,0.00172512,0.0024042183,0.0052917553,0.04777595,0.005221443,0.18835557,0.0070498385,0.15224932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915974,0.00055831036,0.5415251,0.00029719895,0.00073516386,0.0014089841,0.0045946455,0.04496821,0.0032344512,0.38472897,0.01747228,0.00018504116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011551833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006459917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007155993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017393843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051920652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892409167","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10019672","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Leading Countries in Energy Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Energy (signal processing); Originality; Set (abstract data type); Bibliometrics; Basic research","score_opus":0.41830265400411526,"score_gpt":0.4928784972704565,"score_spread":0.07457584326634126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892409167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82042485,0.034130186,0.0070071584,0.002015177,0.00024262894,0.00028173352,0.03267752,0.00036322288,0.10285754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96403563,0.013008232,0.0046484573,0.00012053374,0.00017097953,0.00021301751,0.0156118125,0.00006293261,0.0021283668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98744243,0.0034587989,0.0019988727,0.001025297,0.0052236766,0.00085086114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471095,0.023916172,0.012034406,0.0032520455,0.012561504,0.0011263877],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008426365,0.0005169804,0.0013862725,0.09156125,0.0012185182,0.005969786,0.00072651106,0.0005410851,0.003191465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06418338,0.0002089052,0.0008686027,0.19974628,0.0007374848,0.0026521613,0.0027008397,0.0004083459,0.0011660929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021851945,0.00007697671,0.7799515,0.0026030743,0.00089984806,0.0005545503,0.0024945426,0.005198079,0.00087301736,0.016600171,0.012886717,0.17764296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035680718,0.000095286596,0.8999008,0.0011858343,0.00070642465,0.00074883486,0.007881034,0.0068599125,0.0023346497,0.008793874,0.07137871,0.000078907426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008727236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008223057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90843874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027240433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033535266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044563413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892490753","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10030061","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Natural science; Digital humanities; The arts; Index (typography); Citation","score_opus":0.30268262161416704,"score_gpt":0.4379942073838392,"score_spread":0.13531158576967217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892490753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959345,0.010266704,0.0009691384,0.0029504586,0.000060539103,0.00016650277,0.010563344,0.000075561235,0.079013266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985183,0.0036317518,0.00082857726,0.000076296375,0.0000117879235,0.000049279202,0.0026579525,0.00001872098,0.0028737783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953629,0.0006749402,0.00022055725,0.0004640825,0.0022263026,0.0010511155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872005,0.0021712072,0.0021894155,0.0004030724,0.006215086,0.001820779],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031192757,0.00039559873,0.0007160634,0.019847414,0.008376337,0.00393841,0.0012559335,0.00063021074,0.0051132054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020319685,0.00026036336,0.000581615,0.07219323,0.001224599,0.0020158065,0.0032920106,0.00042688753,0.00044633794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056992663,0.00011295154,0.6818015,0.0018530269,0.00058126915,0.001314622,0.06735132,0.0025364882,0.0010129387,0.063340545,0.028321275,0.15120415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004452472,0.000048638245,0.89713615,0.00033663123,0.00019741783,0.00032592352,0.040102378,0.002232241,0.00021537681,0.0021545745,0.0571259,0.00008024943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99052775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059076227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0800659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42863005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892654067","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11259570","title":"Attitudes towards Open Monographs in the European Research Area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Documentation; Prestige; European Research Area; Open research; Open data; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.6712650080287537,"score_gpt":0.5427315378929685,"score_spread":0.1285334701357852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892654067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659769,0.0013766336,0.00051217596,0.0042764246,0.00003734037,0.000042170464,0.00003598455,0.000008477445,0.027734037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949885,0.0008630831,0.00024805384,0.00074252917,0.000020956692,0.00002776197,0.000024422938,0.0000065784498,0.003078128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740821,0.01646356,0.0014957119,0.001533125,0.0051390072,0.0012865273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91624224,0.055383746,0.011382994,0.0023939768,0.007839546,0.0067574726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034865905,0.00013775732,0.00037467075,0.0030398907,0.0041775024,0.011394976,0.00069766236,0.0015784664,0.004972587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045509905,0.00031006522,0.00024643718,0.0036252162,0.007762972,0.007216641,0.007395663,0.0015609472,0.00040472872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013591036,0.0002354842,0.07664985,0.00032197064,0.000047045618,0.0011488284,0.8451085,0.00022640137,0.0017218085,0.03105696,0.0029311667,0.040415984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020184047,0.00017255252,0.12608299,0.00055591104,0.000019554282,0.00063925807,0.7826124,0.00017424369,0.00065855344,0.0034487506,0.08555616,0.000059437527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040917504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003800253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037855369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027691058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18439072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893144308","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14072565","title":"Incentivizing, excluding, and enduring: On the complexities of quantitative research assessment in Lithuania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lithuanian; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Impact factor; Quality assessment; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.7416085686925351,"score_gpt":0.5619430653180032,"score_spread":0.1796655033745319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893144308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90486187,0.014167741,0.011240886,0.04116524,0.00017364159,0.00014257537,0.000380075,0.0001022192,0.027765723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960238,0.0008483957,0.0017770668,0.0005996377,0.000044373548,0.00006213454,0.000041385712,0.000014133679,0.0005890109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9370795,0.048827413,0.003268946,0.0021880416,0.00593747,0.0026986776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76595575,0.20226076,0.016041659,0.0043847156,0.009504331,0.0018527855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07502431,0.00035166164,0.0007888122,0.006603211,0.0020539772,0.012316542,0.0013179616,0.0014958632,0.0018709475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09054895,0.000312693,0.00043225408,0.008542327,0.008441758,0.00408402,0.0052164947,0.0014128301,0.00014643576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015660293,0.00028210416,0.2955079,0.0038769427,0.00057131954,0.0016939023,0.0450596,0.01714041,0.0025366528,0.34662053,0.006036101,0.27910846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019259292,0.0006775355,0.5450653,0.007126419,0.00046778913,0.0005638676,0.10888871,0.027361356,0.008872951,0.21314451,0.08733272,0.0003062752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140093565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011671478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99339676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013495349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015567044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3967712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893716959","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4663352","title":"Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Reading (process); Technical peer review; Publishing; Peer group","score_opus":0.35782250779723024,"score_gpt":0.5553345672856039,"score_spread":0.1975120594883737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893716959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15861826,0.07739756,0.075542025,0.42971802,0.020275908,0.0018111835,0.045938898,0.0035494766,0.18714881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80319107,0.030296585,0.060143303,0.024803862,0.02348487,0.0025448631,0.028371455,0.0023976658,0.024766367],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7222022,0.14824954,0.025675222,0.015781224,0.084789604,0.0033022217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.151489,0.5596623,0.085948706,0.09258043,0.10280701,0.007512617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17536196,0.00086390495,0.0026217015,0.023315683,0.006913021,0.032052234,0.0036080142,0.0044897804,0.012415656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6859563,0.0011168597,0.0014091537,0.0431136,0.011705619,0.041956738,0.007737281,0.004103607,0.006172706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005131837,0.00028858136,0.106927045,0.0083168475,0.0011958444,0.0004504674,0.041218147,0.0010950143,0.0013619884,0.15723892,0.28901443,0.39237955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016794521,0.00031361758,0.08366843,0.00630932,0.00039600275,0.0006192886,0.019168343,0.001458915,0.001834915,0.23544252,0.6501002,0.0005204502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050194636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006521418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97668433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005478747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016205274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92741376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893994731","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6625300","title":"The oligopoly's shift to open access publishing: How for-profit publishers benefit from gold and hybrid article processing charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); The Internet; Publication; Oligopoly; Web site","score_opus":0.43773702301008016,"score_gpt":0.4652374530212549,"score_spread":0.027500430011174748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893994731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8089395,0.004455324,0.007003511,0.01681809,0.0002454213,0.00010554875,0.000514421,0.00017762542,0.16174059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925978,0.00077955256,0.00086121546,0.00053980877,0.00011657874,0.00000998792,0.00008563698,0.000034221208,0.004975115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103266,0.0023421189,0.00042278727,0.0008605339,0.0038883258,0.0014534616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95176065,0.025032679,0.009141206,0.0024519227,0.006027118,0.0055863033],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051366272,0.00020324434,0.0004072628,0.004013574,0.002195977,0.015528246,0.00085635594,0.0011506496,0.012059022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04476264,0.0002524304,0.0005886475,0.007729713,0.0041603176,0.010198748,0.0034930494,0.0011143506,0.0013175011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010894509,0.00037805637,0.2930576,0.0007095861,0.00028705204,0.0019254165,0.012933611,0.0047087064,0.0026844116,0.27843368,0.026510935,0.3772815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023973457,0.00060093636,0.4883299,0.00076813524,0.00030596677,0.0023644737,0.046189185,0.010664538,0.0034567486,0.19585674,0.25094798,0.00027563848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011413845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019302582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99914366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076150424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044753193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0552513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894102046","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7057143","title":"The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publishing; Publication; The Internet; Profit (economics); Net profit","score_opus":0.5955949863532198,"score_gpt":0.5129104818611224,"score_spread":0.08268450449209741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894102046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.467683,0.01776729,0.04174163,0.065331236,0.0010600311,0.00018382698,0.0019227031,0.00052185316,0.40378848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97607887,0.0030464607,0.0028121509,0.0031955757,0.00035028651,0.00003696377,0.00020682353,0.00006325243,0.014209556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956345,0.0009339513,0.00015838885,0.0007348562,0.0019068392,0.00063146284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707193,0.0045063705,0.0027665943,0.00089776894,0.0016470788,0.0031101534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037842118,0.00028496806,0.0002678184,0.0022859797,0.0015478691,0.010990721,0.00065435295,0.0014879558,0.011671725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014563967,0.00037159317,0.0006305712,0.003999292,0.0040398096,0.008793224,0.0022470024,0.0021495936,0.0018926753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041481294,0.000165336,0.052737128,0.0005044019,0.00018131439,0.0009734574,0.0022357877,0.007972962,0.002437023,0.722884,0.037086654,0.17240721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011668258,0.00033109897,0.1281483,0.00066153426,0.00012505804,0.001535875,0.0059641376,0.017722195,0.002551123,0.41303062,0.42959,0.00022338955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010321634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010283549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99771404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068917004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003964422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050002992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894127560","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6625301","title":"The oligopoly's shift to open access publishing: How for-profit publishers benefit from gold and hybrid article processing charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); The Internet; Publication; Oligopoly; Web site","score_opus":0.43773702301008016,"score_gpt":0.4652374530212549,"score_spread":0.027500430011174748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894127560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8089395,0.004455324,0.007003511,0.01681809,0.0002454213,0.00010554875,0.000514421,0.00017762542,0.16174059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925978,0.00077955256,0.00086121546,0.00053980877,0.00011657874,0.00000998792,0.00008563698,0.000034221208,0.004975115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103266,0.0023421189,0.00042278727,0.0008605339,0.0038883258,0.0014534616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95176065,0.025032679,0.009141206,0.0024519227,0.006027118,0.0055863033],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051366272,0.00020324434,0.0004072628,0.004013574,0.002195977,0.015528246,0.00085635594,0.0011506496,0.012059022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04476264,0.0002524304,0.0005886475,0.007729713,0.0041603176,0.010198748,0.0034930494,0.0011143506,0.0013175011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010894509,0.00037805637,0.2930576,0.0007095861,0.00028705204,0.0019254165,0.012933611,0.0047087064,0.0026844116,0.27843368,0.026510935,0.3772815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023973457,0.00060093636,0.4883299,0.00076813524,0.00030596677,0.0023644737,0.046189185,0.010664538,0.0034567486,0.19585674,0.25094798,0.00027563848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011413845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019302582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99914366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076150424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044753193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0552513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901892655","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14927189.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.8486557295322864,"score_gpt":0.6260689090531582,"score_spread":0.22258682047912826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901892655","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001513671,0.00008612728,0.000060186772,0.00009973337,0.000016098069,0.00012435834,0.9986455,0.0000581174,0.0007584498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008495418,0.0012782764,0.003337625,0.00049405964,0.0001682683,0.006170504,0.9674992,0.00035305534,0.012203467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973924,0.00039088045,0.0011132386,0.00033907534,0.0005462406,0.00021811658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455912,0.038240783,0.005521294,0.0012804155,0.008647916,0.0007184168],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026826488,0.0009812579,0.001994723,0.01737682,0.00077004725,0.0021403143,0.0014171678,0.0011169475,0.8115069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056371436,0.0005714404,0.0013272922,0.033539645,0.00038177185,0.003219707,0.0015587066,0.0007752817,0.097531475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058396184,0.00009014477,0.0023181704,0.04381034,0.00015567141,0.00010587144,0.00016290125,0.00027655947,0.00013630978,0.0011449371,0.92886454,0.022350611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027969936,0.0002549027,0.03391209,0.021761343,0.0007034451,0.0004716006,0.0007781306,0.00046890034,0.00049365795,0.0051711113,0.93306565,0.00012223274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009171546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015515909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98262316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024168715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005808642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2688625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902044807","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12703760","title":"Additional file 1 of Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Inclusion (mineral); Diagram; Data flow diagram; File format","score_opus":0.9198947187760822,"score_gpt":0.6758150319941278,"score_spread":0.24407968678195435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902044807","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029008332,0.000023017099,0.00059928646,0.0002039234,0.00004751217,0.00049587025,0.99533266,0.0003271631,0.0026804241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0123241125,0.00027146202,0.012774222,0.00097648124,0.00025934924,0.0140047725,0.9299048,0.0015980854,0.027886767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995061,0.0013662314,0.001017872,0.0007527165,0.0014269094,0.00037525833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82586354,0.12907746,0.009261602,0.0072853416,0.02631895,0.0021930556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067100613,0.0010455606,0.0012054318,0.0062031257,0.0016010016,0.0027088404,0.0020063394,0.0013119833,0.8673114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11537629,0.0006992256,0.00078908476,0.010195158,0.0003683817,0.002840583,0.0016722908,0.0012862748,0.1857882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015881275,0.00008384973,0.0016927874,0.002109912,0.000022239505,0.000020093748,0.00010426394,0.00015715261,0.000045462402,0.0008090935,0.98428047,0.010515895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002189485,0.00023751597,0.030701637,0.003938352,0.0001671022,0.00022355671,0.0011179877,0.0012407292,0.00064781256,0.011362581,0.9480127,0.0001604542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009812819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017412664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99328995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026844954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005042222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902115866","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14927189","title":"Additional file 1 of Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.8486557295322864,"score_gpt":0.6260689090531582,"score_spread":0.22258682047912826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902115866","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001513671,0.00008612728,0.000060186772,0.00009973337,0.000016098069,0.00012435834,0.9986455,0.0000581174,0.0007584498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008495418,0.0012782764,0.003337625,0.00049405964,0.0001682683,0.006170504,0.9674992,0.00035305534,0.012203467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973924,0.00039088045,0.0011132386,0.00033907534,0.0005462406,0.00021811658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455912,0.038240783,0.005521294,0.0012804155,0.008647916,0.0007184168],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026826488,0.0009812579,0.001994723,0.01737682,0.00077004725,0.0021403143,0.0014171678,0.0011169475,0.8115069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056371436,0.0005714404,0.0013272922,0.033539645,0.00038177185,0.003219707,0.0015587066,0.0007752817,0.097531475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058396184,0.00009014477,0.0023181704,0.04381034,0.00015567141,0.00010587144,0.00016290125,0.00027655947,0.00013630978,0.0011449371,0.92886454,0.022350611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027969936,0.0002549027,0.03391209,0.021761343,0.0007034451,0.0004716006,0.0007781306,0.00046890034,0.00049365795,0.0051711113,0.93306565,0.00012223274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009171546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015515909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98262316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024168715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005808642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2688625},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6902209356","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.5331967","title":"Charleston Hyde Park Debate 2017 Opening Statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Statement (logic); Session (web analytics); George (robot); South carolina; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.879765729153358,"score_gpt":0.6524550071459614,"score_spread":0.22731072200739666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902209356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010749445,0.0065132594,0.00043778255,0.51840806,0.09560965,0.0002764646,0.002713034,0.00043349652,0.37453333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008178538,0.0029802937,0.00062760385,0.12586378,0.03135794,0.00057237194,0.0015834563,0.00056348793,0.8282726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855657,0.0014616358,0.00065328047,0.0014011479,0.009074772,0.0018434706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781349,0.0069866017,0.0011123169,0.0022750283,0.0060311323,0.0054600965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013430031,0.0011045897,0.0013135012,0.0024208757,0.00777086,0.028550312,0.0042384686,0.03021889,0.27290186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046383593,0.0010386632,0.0018540694,0.0032402202,0.0047230897,0.007882839,0.009331641,0.019457083,0.17220828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016251679,0.000013824688,0.00004140433,0.00003133504,0.0000021884784,0.00004233401,0.000050336304,0.000011847163,0.000030961328,0.005011415,0.99237496,0.0023731021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076253095,0.000003465493,0.00014593241,0.000086465065,0.0000012025029,0.0000072245534,0.000056137505,0.000011285136,0.00004099845,0.00045323902,0.9991793,0.000007185196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011420734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018660929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27290186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009356089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017695913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91294765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903540210","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scaf012","title":"Gender differences in Australian research grant awards, applications, amounts, and workforce participation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; University of New South Wales; Australian Government","keywords":"Workforce; Grant funding; Workforce planning; Public policy; Public funding","score_opus":0.7507933445357738,"score_gpt":0.6420226026528547,"score_spread":0.10877074188291913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903540210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96863794,0.0015102293,0.0044032773,0.0037384597,0.00013918964,0.00028404378,0.004314278,0.00006337632,0.016909236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876589,0.0004907074,0.0011308007,0.0002049799,0.00003264752,0.00029355043,0.00082872814,0.00001583076,0.009343901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995847,0.004536498,0.0008313027,0.000764373,0.002416378,0.0014929196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723651,0.010514599,0.007872814,0.0013327372,0.00526069,0.0026540954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018917354,0.00023937035,0.0006803323,0.004361589,0.0008653615,0.0028600553,0.0012109904,0.00062726036,0.008411689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06504909,0.00033739913,0.00079754274,0.0077758078,0.0009969216,0.0015658461,0.0024169763,0.0009141807,0.0011296398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006226285,0.0001974209,0.88138574,0.00072296045,0.00036439928,0.00034922262,0.01298866,0.011531075,0.0008445722,0.016336134,0.007735513,0.06692171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028030276,0.00021515891,0.9569371,0.00024336933,0.00011868171,0.00011455646,0.0049784835,0.0072247717,0.0004275014,0.0049269204,0.024745435,0.000040015315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053237915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057729587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99563843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052364194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051902914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10585606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904655062","doi":"10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0230","title":"Definition and Measurement of Core Collaborators in Scientific Research Collaboration: A Measurement Methodology Based on the H-Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); China; Empirical research; Contrast (vision)","score_opus":0.9675043815555285,"score_gpt":0.7558281282383683,"score_spread":0.21167625331716022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904655062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55928224,0.0026380653,0.38339862,0.0022911602,0.0005333001,0.0030516265,0.003662563,0.0005662006,0.04457628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922807,0.00037715005,0.07315237,0.00012603341,0.00015034633,0.0016198877,0.00088540674,0.000038566388,0.00084322057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97662747,0.010564568,0.0030209497,0.002676015,0.006410739,0.00070032134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9074784,0.056686815,0.014392892,0.0056990255,0.011561253,0.0041815294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019961845,0.0006776322,0.0010512002,0.010449489,0.0021059136,0.003197944,0.0015950364,0.0015447948,0.0029210532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0798803,0.00029499622,0.0012993984,0.013667945,0.0032265363,0.006615039,0.005086802,0.0013633709,0.0006570723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003868639,0.0003664106,0.764759,0.0009995594,0.0008547822,0.00030441728,0.012272762,0.0061084363,0.0021166801,0.039101247,0.007339771,0.16539012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029923592,0.0021179917,0.7361654,0.0010068407,0.000822767,0.0013731432,0.03211329,0.06917581,0.0061112363,0.11610159,0.034097414,0.00061529415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002016644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010968377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98955053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022175424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033504062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1055696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6907202708","doi":"10.21065/advengtech.2.10","title":"REVISED FINITE FIELD-DEPENDENT BRST FORMULATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Publication; Directory; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Open source software; Cover (algebra)","score_opus":0.7391150737279576,"score_gpt":0.6324462365432154,"score_spread":0.10666883718474218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6907202708","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009875203,0.004528665,0.7855226,0.0068861605,0.0022911264,0.00020051387,0.0018210436,0.0004486877,0.18842597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38313138,0.0068928166,0.27967787,0.0041113696,0.0029396366,0.00087768154,0.0028793665,0.0020364095,0.31745353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904114,0.00033788997,0.000047368463,0.00013380763,0.00032973936,0.0001099767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970517,0.0010264548,0.00023623029,0.00033016189,0.0010998754,0.00025548897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018714766,0.0011484802,0.0014373364,0.002176467,0.00087646977,0.003082883,0.0034423347,0.0032251473,0.03649359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006427393,0.0007216446,0.0014652475,0.0014737822,0.0023106558,0.0030741186,0.0018049259,0.0030802533,0.006011794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035819565,0.000032511918,0.0003589745,0.0001934298,0.000029921119,0.00022640843,0.0000905135,0.058561157,0.0007653231,0.9115986,0.01759618,0.010511278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035321224,0.000041389634,0.0005353304,0.00018418784,0.000027125068,0.00025336363,0.00012736826,0.56685376,0.00044921532,0.39296538,0.038463857,0.00006363668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015331946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012392938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03649359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002250986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029785435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12208325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911328626","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10551710","title":"The European landscape of institutional publishing - A synopsis of results from the DIAMAS survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Horizon; Electronic publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.6565119254431434,"score_gpt":0.5427765578711589,"score_spread":0.11373536757198455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911328626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25769368,0.4893488,0.0065534445,0.044948827,0.0018126013,0.00020169913,0.02828867,0.00021544499,0.17093678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6929062,0.2641569,0.0074927015,0.0054289065,0.0013731439,0.00021119155,0.018866511,0.00020745247,0.0093569495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863295,0.004550179,0.002675207,0.0013422293,0.004202902,0.0009000286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777546,0.017114503,0.0053987624,0.0015236725,0.006552937,0.0016346751],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014266067,0.0003266375,0.00055284,0.017253624,0.0010896402,0.008961419,0.00065646885,0.00090203574,0.00525732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024017362,0.00025477336,0.00044235043,0.058483087,0.001465639,0.007776186,0.0032449486,0.0010384367,0.0011016857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048439016,0.00013436221,0.13256083,0.009066337,0.00025924572,0.00062733307,0.014018216,0.0009965351,0.00086593017,0.11410715,0.12653765,0.60034204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010652231,0.000101898244,0.2587253,0.0051594255,0.00006904821,0.0010061568,0.02237775,0.00026229263,0.00074135634,0.0065958765,0.7048856,0.00006471403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054196697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004663044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99103856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003434177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028166652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07544708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911780996","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13951887","title":"Well-tailored words: Comparing the fit of articles within scholarly journals to their citation rates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Publishing; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.565975177827574,"score_gpt":0.48002691968482236,"score_spread":0.08594825814275164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911780996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885106,0.0006047264,0.0049483436,0.000120371646,0.00005214889,0.00009428187,0.001644422,0.00018625044,0.0038387224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959876,0.00011778925,0.0013625951,0.000014438799,0.0000514913,0.000043534088,0.001828809,0.000056421064,0.00053724414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907013,0.0022616978,0.0017394196,0.001299532,0.0035689978,0.00042898467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90662915,0.057216596,0.01895123,0.0056851134,0.008341957,0.0031759394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008616122,0.0007009209,0.0010103768,0.021898434,0.0007061771,0.0042741154,0.00085991935,0.0013861617,0.0033235177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08631489,0.00020199265,0.0011576264,0.019361356,0.0010361405,0.0038636061,0.0024974213,0.0007211579,0.0021830965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012315225,0.00026596818,0.9488419,0.00030133975,0.0011570647,0.00019702596,0.0017480796,0.0022358152,0.0036448573,0.0011235042,0.00090476277,0.038348064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005190769,0.00077416503,0.9783598,0.0000520868,0.0002937542,0.00046705295,0.0025240001,0.010099948,0.0020615952,0.0038156179,0.0014252546,0.00007485678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010687464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009880743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99138385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064606906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005277573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045566916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911856911","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13951886","title":"Well-tailored words: Comparing the fit of articles within scholarly journals to their citation rates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Publishing; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.565975177827574,"score_gpt":0.48002691968482236,"score_spread":0.08594825814275164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911856911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885106,0.0006047264,0.0049483436,0.000120371646,0.00005214889,0.00009428187,0.001644422,0.00018625044,0.0038387224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959876,0.00011778925,0.0013625951,0.000014438799,0.0000514913,0.000043534088,0.001828809,0.000056421064,0.00053724414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907013,0.0022616978,0.0017394196,0.001299532,0.0035689978,0.00042898467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90662915,0.057216596,0.01895123,0.0056851134,0.008341957,0.0031759394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008616122,0.0007009209,0.0010103768,0.021898434,0.0007061771,0.0042741154,0.00085991935,0.0013861617,0.0033235177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08631489,0.00020199265,0.0011576264,0.019361356,0.0010361405,0.0038636061,0.0024974213,0.0007211579,0.0021830965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012315225,0.00026596818,0.9488419,0.00030133975,0.0011570647,0.00019702596,0.0017480796,0.0022358152,0.0036448573,0.0011235042,0.00090476277,0.038348064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005190769,0.00077416503,0.9783598,0.0000520868,0.0002937542,0.00046705295,0.0025240001,0.010099948,0.0020615952,0.0038156179,0.0014252546,0.00007485678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010687464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009880743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99138385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064606906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005277573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045566916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912098540","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15104692","title":"Comparative Analysis of Global Research Publications (2020-2024): Trends, Statistical Insights and recommendations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Statistical analysis; Bibliometrics; Key (lock); Research methodology; Comparative research; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.4075055196280089,"score_gpt":0.5343509377203605,"score_spread":0.12684541809235156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912098540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41640514,0.19695657,0.038544435,0.16934717,0.007711619,0.0009952388,0.11244987,0.0025065544,0.055083398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82763976,0.050802466,0.05165519,0.0045533157,0.0023303397,0.00070332194,0.05709262,0.0005464469,0.004676641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851633,0.0050355904,0.0027661496,0.0018482637,0.0043889,0.00079781207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8744225,0.063259184,0.015230647,0.006625448,0.036798377,0.0036638712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03252355,0.0010579338,0.0016954466,0.04608764,0.0010714327,0.007262434,0.0012016749,0.00085932994,0.0048274714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07216535,0.0003082916,0.002192995,0.07688619,0.0017729359,0.010367731,0.001995927,0.0015701896,0.0020505395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038418738,0.00015278434,0.5151324,0.008133045,0.002848966,0.00036345483,0.0024918942,0.0018031959,0.00096925366,0.017289527,0.062432274,0.38799897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005569009,0.00041642162,0.75511277,0.008606371,0.0021729993,0.0006118568,0.019076258,0.0053437715,0.0018073409,0.019383634,0.18718112,0.00023173996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013751857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01927363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023300692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005693296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17200309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912287910","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16848496","title":"Survey 2025: Repository data of Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (2021-2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"EMPA; Resource (disambiguation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Data collection; Information repository","score_opus":0.3340918517089357,"score_gpt":0.47247331541824933,"score_spread":0.13838146370931365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912287910","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060307735,0.00006595079,0.00008784114,0.000048806312,0.00001000533,0.0000149384405,0.9983473,0.00019610056,0.0006261248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010151082,0.00006148161,0.00022663132,0.000018622271,0.000007526533,0.000092242386,0.99788624,0.00003562187,0.00065657485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715185,0.00040666776,0.00042523292,0.00047290814,0.001159771,0.0003834975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365693,0.0011870363,0.001168833,0.0010145303,0.0023873611,0.0005853404],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002011344,0.001508096,0.0009515737,0.011547956,0.00062466436,0.0025765859,0.0014292268,0.0012393986,0.034762174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01010678,0.0005223027,0.0008569856,0.019166866,0.00032660575,0.001232689,0.0019984609,0.0011274881,0.046084646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015928561,0.000049902137,0.006933501,0.0012345016,0.000072090945,0.0000630854,0.00010046075,0.00046764145,0.00044322782,0.0015346138,0.98003036,0.008911294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015014785,0.00003622285,0.043368474,0.00046376215,0.00005236521,0.00011350521,0.00021672943,0.00066610775,0.0012991909,0.0009214405,0.9526539,0.000058206017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031481877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03640289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022214085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004925686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116291046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912531527","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4663353","title":"Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Reading (process); Technical peer review; Publishing; Peer group","score_opus":0.46098422563619834,"score_gpt":0.51296049253763,"score_spread":0.051976266901431645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912531527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24255517,0.08180855,0.07568027,0.32519224,0.014921311,0.0017773721,0.054633368,0.00304208,0.20038965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459294,0.024071971,0.04820763,0.013844029,0.013901899,0.0019366292,0.030113144,0.0015820499,0.020413423],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7812391,0.108565845,0.020386966,0.013131315,0.07377221,0.0029046307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20996049,0.5145412,0.08952749,0.083153106,0.09603696,0.006780721],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13609159,0.00083513965,0.0024374074,0.023773026,0.006092195,0.02864297,0.0033801992,0.0038085643,0.010672974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5996758,0.00094564655,0.0013584541,0.045695733,0.010155359,0.03707882,0.0066927304,0.0035449096,0.005119735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006030295,0.00035119362,0.14045677,0.008036292,0.0011718731,0.00051414047,0.043837655,0.0012433915,0.0015635467,0.1648569,0.22182961,0.41553566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016539845,0.00037592833,0.11819232,0.0056893583,0.00041292649,0.00075999595,0.024550736,0.001690456,0.002241982,0.23059,0.6148063,0.000524499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005296305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006665249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052814693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01357418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7197297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912544719","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4550438","title":"Analysis of Earth Science Research Output: A Scientometric Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Earth observation; Scientometrics; Earth system science; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.6331093409719486,"score_gpt":0.5237898501723086,"score_spread":0.10931949079963998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912544719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77095467,0.04473513,0.021870174,0.0054206555,0.00058906997,0.0016991615,0.062233277,0.00056143064,0.091936484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425627,0.017257547,0.010800964,0.00025977253,0.0007852969,0.0010245289,0.024253393,0.00013574,0.0029200786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97799087,0.0042246617,0.004547962,0.0011872852,0.011423516,0.00062569533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251578,0.042900104,0.011321376,0.0033904288,0.016151391,0.0010790185],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01859185,0.00065574853,0.0012485922,0.10562293,0.0009764759,0.005801066,0.0007877197,0.00056407414,0.0036713644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07174314,0.0002170948,0.0014945285,0.18748085,0.001031936,0.004833757,0.0022124967,0.00046618524,0.001129359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002368578,0.0001823596,0.6236003,0.016346326,0.0026704366,0.0006847266,0.0060144393,0.002003052,0.00205709,0.00933131,0.017310996,0.3195621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032868054,0.00030602043,0.862013,0.0025077907,0.0017847903,0.0010060191,0.013866411,0.0043127015,0.0026270095,0.006351097,0.10507354,0.000118817174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021072698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89437705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017410849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030695496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0983243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912644048","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6363362","title":"Bibliometrics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Visibility; Field (mathematics); Thematic map; Portrait","score_opus":0.5157524444945333,"score_gpt":0.4558979313338611,"score_spread":0.059854513160672196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912644048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006534332,0.05561043,0.042400915,0.008492077,0.004528585,0.0013412642,0.09976794,0.0069939606,0.7743305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15436088,0.14948629,0.12417672,0.004534083,0.010233849,0.0030888212,0.1957091,0.004379255,0.35403097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97344863,0.0054966756,0.002855649,0.0027158149,0.014843317,0.0006399254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97938937,0.007669286,0.0021022344,0.002778267,0.007503203,0.0005576154],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007789056,0.0015543596,0.0021924367,0.05835581,0.0019418475,0.01308932,0.0023877374,0.0019883504,0.07135535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04403852,0.0005337048,0.0012932393,0.094887495,0.0015453794,0.0076132403,0.0039486894,0.0015124255,0.061433632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768654,0.00005360184,0.0038605495,0.0035364619,0.00018629084,0.00009948908,0.0007690835,0.00096552214,0.0004193617,0.11925624,0.3943623,0.4764234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000765986,0.000016798493,0.0030028645,0.00072709564,0.000031696356,0.00018871436,0.00024472998,0.00041114652,0.00025031104,0.017765986,0.97732466,0.00002837268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057359897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004083256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00516188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00627387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23870742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912710652","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8120964","title":"Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); European union; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.3545861461575004,"score_gpt":0.4552428240772219,"score_spread":0.1006566779197215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912710652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09725309,0.03133459,0.14775449,0.13327451,0.010637731,0.0017806898,0.017063333,0.004830691,0.556071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51032114,0.030943254,0.27954432,0.018157259,0.003184838,0.0025762229,0.035632346,0.0028782794,0.11676227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85674334,0.03700105,0.020419382,0.008175818,0.06945009,0.0082102595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7830067,0.043046046,0.014086183,0.02804628,0.11808165,0.013733062],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090397276,0.0010743472,0.0013333731,0.016831558,0.00637322,0.028834753,0.0037296785,0.0059582214,0.013944415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13670099,0.0014142529,0.0022480225,0.017829832,0.0050893123,0.019476317,0.0137229655,0.0076058293,0.010777494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055127096,0.00045465477,0.04997932,0.0024354479,0.0002614669,0.0003745778,0.0069286954,0.0034136202,0.003124843,0.3319948,0.13225558,0.4682257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005396293,0.00017496882,0.03751456,0.0024023517,0.00009649638,0.00047910356,0.0038690232,0.0015713922,0.0032735697,0.04656463,0.9037109,0.0002890355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05155441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040510036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024611335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0542713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47807223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912770179","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6366634","title":"Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Hyperlink; Precision and recall; Set (abstract data type); Tag cloud; Completeness (order theory); Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.6353235009814185,"score_gpt":0.5617049702212744,"score_spread":0.07361853076014413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912770179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8904936,0.009576524,0.052221335,0.0016771927,0.000751423,0.0016797475,0.015409556,0.0025072433,0.025683384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88225645,0.0018039638,0.09361181,0.0007330422,0.00054514094,0.0014301224,0.015746927,0.00050690275,0.0033656391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9008672,0.0384018,0.018720828,0.011252213,0.029441543,0.001316369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45711288,0.38392273,0.056270953,0.035100352,0.0657886,0.0018045589],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1197923,0.0010943761,0.0018645169,0.03666399,0.0015645273,0.0063555073,0.0022737721,0.0023829534,0.0014103289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33409074,0.00075771735,0.0021364987,0.018966269,0.0018329796,0.0062208734,0.0044538756,0.0011659686,0.0017317027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014333456,0.0004546942,0.7326017,0.0046623917,0.003204586,0.00057108636,0.01497906,0.0025780015,0.006198835,0.0025151595,0.015581615,0.2152195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023483255,0.0010477557,0.82895976,0.0023956257,0.003408558,0.002577587,0.011236176,0.038146157,0.02725935,0.0057944655,0.078266144,0.000673551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032360156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004023233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00128156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009947219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6335298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912809736","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8120965","title":"Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); European union; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.3545861461575004,"score_gpt":0.4552428240772219,"score_spread":0.1006566779197215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912809736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09725309,0.03133459,0.14775449,0.13327451,0.010637731,0.0017806898,0.017063333,0.004830691,0.556071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51032114,0.030943254,0.27954432,0.018157259,0.003184838,0.0025762229,0.035632346,0.0028782794,0.11676227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85674334,0.03700105,0.020419382,0.008175818,0.06945009,0.0082102595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7830067,0.043046046,0.014086183,0.02804628,0.11808165,0.013733062],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090397276,0.0010743472,0.0013333731,0.016831558,0.00637322,0.028834753,0.0037296785,0.0059582214,0.013944415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13670099,0.0014142529,0.0022480225,0.017829832,0.0050893123,0.019476317,0.0137229655,0.0076058293,0.010777494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055127096,0.00045465477,0.04997932,0.0024354479,0.0002614669,0.0003745778,0.0069286954,0.0034136202,0.003124843,0.3319948,0.13225558,0.4682257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005396293,0.00017496882,0.03751456,0.0024023517,0.00009649638,0.00047910356,0.0038690232,0.0015713922,0.0032735697,0.04656463,0.9037109,0.0002890355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05155441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040510036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024611335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0542713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47807223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912988133","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8428888","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Open government; Compliance (psychology); Exploratory research","score_opus":0.3536032678883995,"score_gpt":0.4641034051616275,"score_spread":0.110500137273228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912988133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97259325,0.00072041247,0.0010369434,0.003173902,0.00003348292,0.00017499247,0.0017894893,0.000064533,0.020413063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666315,0.00028599883,0.0009315613,0.000118574695,0.00001549982,0.000082366394,0.00061000336,0.000020500369,0.0012723143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9390391,0.012267846,0.004825357,0.00479091,0.031830795,0.0072459783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6709296,0.1431998,0.07322526,0.012502671,0.07810305,0.02203955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03336574,0.00035406486,0.0009853016,0.011724489,0.009833778,0.009612507,0.0021554232,0.0012043357,0.003453297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20970652,0.00040071725,0.0007084946,0.031152869,0.004238712,0.003443979,0.0077298414,0.001769529,0.00038181662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023037259,0.00015192946,0.90375143,0.00029724877,0.00024081835,0.00021101104,0.045046028,0.0010924805,0.0006374614,0.005317591,0.0025735158,0.04045017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028541943,0.000090656984,0.9188358,0.00018860331,0.0001299166,0.00007686961,0.06354775,0.0015546946,0.00073194545,0.0012424989,0.013485237,0.000087418666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8573396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8622287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043420885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09989069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31504202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920271294","doi":"10.60692/5tgdj-h6x53","title":"Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The Internet; Index (typography); Value (mathematics); Spelling; MEDLINE; Inclusion (mineral); Reputation","score_opus":0.4857430438870848,"score_gpt":0.4907130379714074,"score_spread":0.0049699940843226376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920271294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980307,0.0006372012,0.000119213495,0.00022782355,0.000023316785,0.00004489981,0.0004824179,0.0000037659854,0.00043054702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986274,0.00026195805,0.000078941135,0.00016512163,0.000049719976,0.00007499514,0.00059850985,0.000003777765,0.0001394857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962902,0.0011755758,0.00078266364,0.0005533551,0.00082638557,0.00037182443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97106373,0.012834822,0.010451428,0.0012667249,0.0020228138,0.0023605162],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006219742,0.0003028556,0.0009890049,0.0030265483,0.0006298994,0.0012590693,0.00071466254,0.0016216688,0.0032382617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027779948,0.0005826884,0.00077174755,0.0029557084,0.0009797198,0.0031626623,0.0013772137,0.0008045864,0.0007129972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005952253,0.00015621474,0.99626523,0.00007049575,0.00019518353,0.00009287992,0.0007005363,0.000015462841,0.000106775435,0.000065723994,0.00017958578,0.0015566354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048698697,0.0009722149,0.99561226,0.0000337653,0.000117185526,0.00029615342,0.002279368,0.00013281924,0.000046805973,0.000111800124,0.00033503192,0.000013801858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000856207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008346376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99837834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003108635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030371087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03289354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920588494","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25264615","title":"Research Output of Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS): A Bibliometric Analysis from 1993-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"San Jose State University Scholar Works (San Jose State University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Information science; Information system; National library","score_opus":0.1606105128631694,"score_gpt":0.3883325212760997,"score_spread":0.22772200841293028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920588494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47543806,0.045394864,0.0013008565,0.025741145,0.0010535622,0.00026995095,0.31954214,0.00061561406,0.13064381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80577815,0.030734457,0.0034813955,0.0009855079,0.00056063477,0.00018056741,0.14001718,0.00018740779,0.018074641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855563,0.00045119788,0.0010118436,0.00050698954,0.0113756675,0.0010980008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732782,0.0019862796,0.0028779702,0.00031854725,0.020207282,0.0013316836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054588295,0.00067405624,0.0007222845,0.050042443,0.003424746,0.0054922975,0.0010901983,0.00078347314,0.0026448886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023225255,0.0002454034,0.00070066674,0.1192056,0.00089409924,0.001904943,0.0014711902,0.0007975833,0.001241075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394635,0.00012904973,0.50392854,0.004117705,0.00048851804,0.00067083666,0.008039233,0.0016761667,0.0012537342,0.008581068,0.1937005,0.27702004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069732623,0.000032427244,0.85621953,0.00031087792,0.00013384923,0.00015454454,0.0038679182,0.0003665943,0.0011751481,0.00019892589,0.13746549,0.000067706824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89548147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.927164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99454117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03741305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046021525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2714519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920781019","doi":"10.60692/p6ayr-4bd79","title":"A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Research Canada; Alberta Innovates","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Multidisciplinary approach; Investment (military); Impact assessment; Gender bias; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Economic impact analysis; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.8458960979796117,"score_gpt":0.6419427642089373,"score_spread":0.20395333377067448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920781019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022812453,0.013353537,0.0033607928,0.96189266,0.017186046,0.00013071172,0.000112756454,0.00011320889,0.0036222544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011011868,0.018186409,0.031922743,0.9185861,0.014825155,0.0009114847,0.00017390848,0.00026917344,0.004113165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6674288,0.24160542,0.020200862,0.01210625,0.05085379,0.007805019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2660419,0.5719721,0.019820536,0.027395211,0.093001395,0.021768913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42280123,0.002795928,0.006992224,0.008029628,0.008513621,0.031199014,0.012668468,0.056133494,0.015161242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47840354,0.002211357,0.009423582,0.009385959,0.05300975,0.06729751,0.0235803,0.081940606,0.0055250004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002034098,0.00014852587,0.0014815247,0.00487452,0.0003365865,0.00023016096,0.013133315,0.0006594552,0.00042556194,0.14263634,0.71419305,0.12167763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001044841,0.00012412161,0.0011843683,0.014550187,0.00027899464,0.00020301648,0.008850081,0.00043074563,0.0002718799,0.1792383,0.7945027,0.00026117824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017086592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032195214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99197036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021182172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09463455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7117889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920871362","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22721474","title":"Additional file 1 of Differences in collaboration structures and impact among prominent researchers in Europe and North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.27774964472061875,"score_gpt":0.48997942837143066,"score_spread":0.2122297836508119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920871362","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021165198,0.000011049981,0.0001123293,0.00007671092,0.000022334692,0.000036915277,0.9985109,0.00010922063,0.00090881414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008898073,0.00013661684,0.0029003173,0.0003372733,0.000103104336,0.0013103841,0.9737197,0.00047870987,0.01211579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890816,0.0001752339,0.00020127141,0.00025731296,0.00027821527,0.00017990927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563136,0.032211438,0.0027500817,0.0016805101,0.0060072206,0.0010372237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018671615,0.0009698088,0.0010801887,0.0050658183,0.0010993101,0.001928764,0.0018230554,0.000989172,0.90317684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03773758,0.0005793615,0.0007780715,0.010042953,0.00026994664,0.0026464814,0.0013105159,0.0009632766,0.18166918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120040044,0.000060201084,0.0024565884,0.001602595,0.000027920913,0.0000341206,0.00007573538,0.00026563532,0.000048092843,0.000757282,0.98819983,0.006351983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032206818,0.00026188465,0.088692605,0.005232663,0.00023726549,0.0005155042,0.0019346726,0.002334237,0.00067085953,0.015107151,0.88160264,0.00018979645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019905081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029380953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015086771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027521178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13810647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924941821","doi":"10.15468/dl.txcrp3","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Download; Alien; Range (aeronautics); The Internet","score_opus":0.2850051239238738,"score_gpt":0.442292210992941,"score_spread":0.15728708706906724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924941821","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043959317,0.00002653713,0.000039227118,0.00003743242,0.0000099964345,0.0000064577666,0.9988722,0.00031795926,0.00064614695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00018349722,0.000041453903,0.00023441599,0.000049775004,0.000003905229,0.00006169273,0.99875677,0.00014562566,0.0005227591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.00016235988,0.00016723872,0.0003765984,0.00025793436,0.00017899505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970419,0.0009441426,0.00030714207,0.0006583206,0.0007299116,0.0003186109],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010547709,0.0018813835,0.0015761025,0.006184848,0.0009827408,0.0028511025,0.002520671,0.0020290976,0.15662266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007315015,0.00087711343,0.0011541069,0.011908147,0.00044175566,0.0019796714,0.0024466852,0.0019251818,0.19810173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003385392,0.000014295922,0.00044718644,0.000710427,0.000015855352,0.000016290964,0.000024883146,0.00013202422,0.000120644574,0.0004735385,0.9963888,0.0016223505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008718636,0.000009301679,0.0018912014,0.000216797,0.000015480084,0.000033330674,0.00006990172,0.00015813978,0.00018042604,0.00085712376,0.9964645,0.000016645237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032932915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84337735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001710808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026265625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.523955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929663426","doi":"10.5063/f1736pc4","title":"A List With Traits of all Herptile Species Within Central California Deserts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"UC Santa Barbara","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Arid; Population; Biodiversity; Download","score_opus":0.4447425893510646,"score_gpt":0.5036460230111919,"score_spread":0.05890343366012729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929663426","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019521409,0.000038036724,0.000012644294,0.000018700159,0.0000050261337,0.000002989852,0.9989569,0.000052744734,0.00071780843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049703696,0.000056137924,0.000108227156,0.000014003211,0.0000029629236,0.000028156941,0.99862754,0.000020241961,0.0006457216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959844,0.000030131883,0.000046767018,0.00014237619,0.00010516871,0.00007707857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984034,0.0003787627,0.00021529588,0.0002521872,0.0005524588,0.00019794588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003721618,0.0011330837,0.001024772,0.0054587233,0.00087343424,0.0015735308,0.0013537691,0.00068993296,0.07336243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024942232,0.0004744172,0.000605138,0.009841005,0.000213286,0.0008124572,0.0011170997,0.0011057915,0.046360597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036814734,0.000012804313,0.002713504,0.0005542372,0.000020685451,0.000017689323,0.000034225195,0.00011304805,0.000106234984,0.00032959357,0.99340856,0.0026525587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013816294,0.000009732967,0.040629003,0.00041861788,0.00003576806,0.000040355073,0.00018640501,0.00020198617,0.00021241093,0.00045780692,0.9576487,0.00002104437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10822385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19862306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10822385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013441069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00255833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24542183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929945980","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11327643","title":"Pipistrellus (Perimyotis) subflavus F. Cuvier 1832","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Subgenus; Hibernation (computing); Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.40463206834564636,"score_gpt":0.4620920326806788,"score_spread":0.05745996433503242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929945980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36017054,0.022814171,0.008677172,0.00056473527,0.0007876269,0.0004087955,0.008414672,0.0013952135,0.59676707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8974001,0.0061972435,0.007579955,0.00038279698,0.0001899984,0.0002446669,0.0065649045,0.00008546505,0.081354834],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991775,0.000008403732,0.000005437118,0.000029207524,0.000024889701,0.000014213991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999244,0.000009765909,0.000037192083,0.000006543329,0.000014025461,0.000008046221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009537425,0.0006726784,0.000205795,0.0015373358,0.00090578606,0.00025764236,0.00044376083,0.00029487727,0.010320108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015722758,0.00017233954,0.00017777446,0.000991003,0.00025029195,0.00043841006,0.00063004525,0.00026788452,0.0037990313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040750162,0.000097804295,0.06916323,0.0008444628,0.00006547316,0.0015202179,0.0018367212,0.0009539281,0.026576286,0.0047032284,0.06262648,0.83120465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002725274,0.00013957042,0.5837848,0.0003739669,0.00007969687,0.0038159816,0.0006018819,0.00052914745,0.0020523418,0.00073053135,0.40784344,0.000021293894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02765375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045111388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02765375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000628571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002590799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054985583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929978722","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10854688","title":"L'Observatoire des cultures écrites anciennes Biblissima+","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Belgica; Web site; Indigenous","score_opus":0.42757642540885615,"score_gpt":0.47507315517081344,"score_spread":0.04749672976195729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929978722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23439787,0.061588265,0.0061562667,0.03530111,0.003878804,0.00018795679,0.031178162,0.00093311723,0.6263785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6051115,0.036693122,0.005733734,0.002153687,0.0015577924,0.00031666344,0.0099721765,0.00074056507,0.33772078],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962714,0.000914716,0.0001995822,0.0004800049,0.0016921676,0.00044222045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370015,0.001617814,0.0009055782,0.00056858757,0.0027692541,0.00043861283],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002787803,0.0004502119,0.0006434206,0.0065740454,0.0027824831,0.007296427,0.00037066566,0.00073330477,0.029890552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008948102,0.00034537137,0.0003880907,0.017695788,0.0016146601,0.0034681107,0.0023627789,0.0017187136,0.0058264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034512076,0.000098532866,0.047833063,0.00229619,0.00015338692,0.00089375145,0.053026278,0.0008175637,0.0072616,0.07831313,0.23782277,0.5711387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076837105,0.000018275538,0.09260623,0.0004157347,0.000012925637,0.00020129864,0.006669351,0.000121426914,0.0009831361,0.0009062016,0.8980236,0.000034136458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20257042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29617995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99342597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085999835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009321045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40278268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930042006","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11986003","title":"business plan esempio pratico pdf","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business plan; Plan (archaeology); Action plan","score_opus":0.32836154048172783,"score_gpt":0.4281970351296924,"score_spread":0.0998354946479646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930042006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017208504,0.00018243531,0.0002231072,0.0010946254,0.0008804114,0.000099128876,0.0008964781,0.00070858037,0.9957431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007819318,0.00019382172,0.00017005167,0.00035943883,0.00014973638,0.0000333452,0.0005490487,0.00026302724,0.99749964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911994,0.00005240425,0.000022845652,0.00010712368,0.0005886602,0.00010906225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984255,0.000111500565,0.00005684051,0.000148676,0.0007233369,0.00053413195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072041125,0.0007528239,0.00058268366,0.0011227593,0.0018154813,0.0068721883,0.0012343716,0.001871807,0.89482397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003293989,0.00048800852,0.00052578,0.0012767665,0.0005037815,0.003620529,0.002606544,0.0029301082,0.8709083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020175517,0.000039990897,0.000053594944,0.00007092644,0.0000010857889,0.000038309117,0.000023735733,0.000024719488,0.00016566824,0.0024059445,0.96331733,0.033838447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057281754,0.000010597974,0.00016160715,0.00003121106,6.505397e-7,0.000027572285,0.000034928707,0.000023389854,0.00005869496,0.00024002611,0.999403,0.0000027038898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031777977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007383037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10517603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012671695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021347154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15002084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930221110","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11475507","title":"Towards a methodology for monitoring and evaluating living labs: Insights from the early stages within the SCORE Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Work (physics); Program evaluation; Risk assessment","score_opus":0.688844935209892,"score_gpt":0.5342244836948993,"score_spread":0.1546204515149927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930221110","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12279166,0.0016254645,0.8452273,0.0030174227,0.00014006333,0.0021994936,0.0014646889,0.003523829,0.020010022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34465647,0.00054047385,0.6478229,0.00023300645,0.00006542956,0.0011224541,0.0016193192,0.0003829439,0.0035570334],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9393178,0.033927966,0.0037263837,0.004144462,0.017654661,0.0012285884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8771848,0.050152846,0.018481582,0.012547254,0.038442317,0.003191209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04962418,0.0014239236,0.0011423326,0.009554181,0.0014659669,0.012623707,0.0027866408,0.0019363121,0.0019631502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101800844,0.0006186418,0.0006989297,0.008368111,0.0022950035,0.00732211,0.0045330813,0.0018352021,0.001772541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047776356,0.001091659,0.11925663,0.0017453588,0.00035488768,0.00029906293,0.014028361,0.015375927,0.017742658,0.06265699,0.011445192,0.7555254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030106906,0.0040819687,0.18672323,0.0019981193,0.0005881438,0.0012859415,0.030767981,0.33180103,0.065482385,0.21224289,0.16384596,0.00088131067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061135464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089896675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04962418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030191292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006662636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26244086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930339551","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13968114","title":"Supplemental files for Evolutionary rescue during extreme drought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Extreme environment; SNP; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Scripting language; Data file; Baseline (sea)","score_opus":0.3535110500136546,"score_gpt":0.4441385042591202,"score_spread":0.09062745424546559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930339551","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065703534,0.00002176703,0.00013334621,0.00003544193,0.000018921733,0.000009035551,0.99868673,0.00043407283,0.00059504795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006401171,0.000046897174,0.0011189623,0.00009146432,0.000014576264,0.00016460377,0.99568826,0.00059907086,0.0016359701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850464,0.0002777223,0.00020666164,0.0004361752,0.00035850046,0.00021628127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939892,0.0030482053,0.00049050874,0.0010768473,0.0010305304,0.00036468185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019385002,0.0015608646,0.0015668634,0.003580677,0.0010896382,0.0029967285,0.002340835,0.0015549221,0.4180499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135728195,0.00090680155,0.0014481554,0.0062385327,0.00038541216,0.00203286,0.0019913616,0.0019133177,0.23179886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033159024,0.000011877438,0.000813984,0.0005724734,0.000027470403,0.000015390759,0.000024849649,0.0001888911,0.00009719739,0.00046017717,0.99581075,0.0019438225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023708549,0.000014705095,0.0060367873,0.0003624626,0.000041131796,0.00009033169,0.00008752209,0.00041905185,0.0003648145,0.0029178022,0.9893918,0.000036526202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122485645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032147855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4180499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013721583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024316728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83008116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930378085","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11738663","title":"Iso 4200 pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; International standard; Table (database); Welding; Unit (ring theory)","score_opus":0.3566808685002366,"score_gpt":0.45931338496297125,"score_spread":0.10263251646273464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930378085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010150262,0.00121538,0.023505498,0.001021597,0.0021349196,0.0009905142,0.025937987,0.0073518935,0.9368272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077626402,0.0027022383,0.03369463,0.0015708294,0.0005720527,0.0010220539,0.092365004,0.005369286,0.8549413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943915,0.00044947324,0.0003840356,0.0003340042,0.0040958156,0.00034517024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370307,0.00023020267,0.00015446707,0.00054038875,0.005218584,0.00015323692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026406718,0.0019720928,0.00073263637,0.0065955715,0.0014310762,0.0043197772,0.0029056172,0.0025205715,0.28816777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006547182,0.0008908372,0.00088516326,0.0050039296,0.00083487266,0.0050534084,0.002201462,0.0019308773,0.3609046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005516904,0.00007771754,0.00023434557,0.00045658206,0.0000069139264,0.00005814877,0.00009888137,0.00042507693,0.0018517383,0.013383219,0.8395829,0.14376934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046309306,0.000013115871,0.0002832708,0.00007007727,0.0000024310839,0.00004259808,0.000029548673,0.000077136785,0.0004906571,0.0009274156,0.99805105,0.000008136642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01251951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008271766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28816777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053129336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930432289","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11691582","title":"The art spirit pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Art world; Art methodology; Modern art; Contemporary art; Individualism; Anthropology of art; Hierarchy; Appeal; Frontier","score_opus":0.33600579048130935,"score_gpt":0.4560512700818824,"score_spread":0.12004547960057305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930432289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025083162,0.0006513888,0.0012185681,0.0010246426,0.003701198,0.00014193873,0.0019100937,0.0019444819,0.98915684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001610146,0.00094873586,0.0009938334,0.00065550103,0.00082858594,0.0000570812,0.0014347441,0.0012927119,0.9921787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905103,0.000057832538,0.00003889149,0.00010276889,0.0006300529,0.0001193628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816054,0.00017843956,0.000051279214,0.00029720407,0.0008800812,0.00043252754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069356174,0.001216811,0.0008199864,0.0026296873,0.002507999,0.0127224745,0.0017927769,0.0023019626,0.840828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003722699,0.0006802969,0.001376119,0.002051576,0.0010205577,0.006581084,0.0039348686,0.003662647,0.75005925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025808891,0.000027266018,0.00003277056,0.00017626029,0.000002219869,0.00007534293,0.000055586086,0.000063895954,0.00046587444,0.004677665,0.93765724,0.056740064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050541726,0.000007881037,0.0001016289,0.000054393313,0.000001542109,0.00007775368,0.00004965114,0.000035920908,0.00022061986,0.00074433786,0.9986952,0.000005902978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028007524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046065673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.840828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001640461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019026698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22703958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930521914","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1179270","title":"How To Find A Balance Between Bibliometric And Societal Impact In Academia.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Balance (ability); Sustainability science; Section (typography); Sustainable development; Bibliometrics; Global Leadership","score_opus":0.4067474857303525,"score_gpt":0.495141150820893,"score_spread":0.08839366509054047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930521914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046390295,0.022024479,0.004219043,0.9441782,0.0023265895,0.000069004986,0.000439026,0.0001758783,0.021928681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56232506,0.05503955,0.04992475,0.2892515,0.021083627,0.001372731,0.0011336762,0.0009809473,0.018888162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9080448,0.059799768,0.0049716304,0.0030728849,0.021294013,0.0028169106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6933236,0.21262653,0.0139047615,0.008938896,0.05845098,0.012755197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12041116,0.0009001884,0.0021976326,0.03488387,0.00734406,0.02506065,0.002864736,0.007651955,0.010582884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39491743,0.00076681835,0.0009845289,0.049718235,0.016023628,0.04841859,0.011365368,0.008641514,0.005295448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010174948,0.00017267809,0.023056157,0.0015853595,0.00040125393,0.00011527759,0.009835777,0.0005712282,0.00031165226,0.15573256,0.44484398,0.36327237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009791808,0.000120544944,0.027694935,0.0056814095,0.00018734825,0.0002472549,0.047738284,0.0011329945,0.0006406775,0.4839602,0.43224382,0.00025459638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00767102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127203725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96511614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014159854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129523715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6368027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931287278","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4632038","title":"Dataset for: Effective structural unit analysis in hexagonal close packed alloys – reconstruction of prior beta microstructures &amp; crystal orientation post processing analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Microstructure; Phase (matter); Crystal (programming language); Plane (geometry); Grain boundary; Pole figure; Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.16907051121588798,"score_gpt":0.44130938987542334,"score_spread":0.27223887865953533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931287278","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003997544,0.00033414614,0.0028486843,0.0003110352,0.00018810642,0.000076778604,0.97969085,0.008307097,0.0042457376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004792024,0.00013138035,0.0064662467,0.00011524572,0.000022962939,0.00020331517,0.9850677,0.0012777034,0.0019234484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900264,0.00007690901,0.000077423414,0.00023625052,0.0004403205,0.00016653193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987966,0.00021411665,0.0001124769,0.00038184036,0.00041316365,0.00008176433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087698555,0.0030692315,0.0015687721,0.0016007198,0.0014487512,0.002091133,0.0038742295,0.0032253847,0.09855151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031198973,0.0010543695,0.0021814227,0.0024288069,0.00067554857,0.0015556448,0.0022521527,0.0027719934,0.09171561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023573829,0.00010944975,0.0015455481,0.0010706241,0.000086179374,0.00013810632,0.000055907003,0.0018194993,0.004589035,0.0013818608,0.979684,0.009284066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634578,0.0001315006,0.009600722,0.00029954084,0.000094925126,0.00037840565,0.00018813126,0.0079335645,0.012396639,0.006833713,0.96137565,0.00013259682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010664951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024716107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09855151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001177924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013719714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32968765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931358340","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5911327","title":"Entanglements in Fishing Gear and Strandings Reported to the Whale Release and Strandings Group in Newfoundland and Labrador and a Summary of the Whale Release and Strandings Program during 2020.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whale; Fishing; Commercial fishing; Marine mammal; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chondrichthyes","score_opus":0.19789458600713042,"score_gpt":0.40873288866604773,"score_spread":0.21083830265891731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931358340","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23045668,0.004160206,0.00026487443,0.0009068131,0.00017085226,0.00014995149,0.74900544,0.00017141877,0.01471369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25724477,0.006278251,0.0007460764,0.00035287792,0.00009139113,0.00027388922,0.70415753,0.000050845003,0.030804407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.000110399495,0.00038625006,0.00023086161,0.00066698965,0.00048862497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919208,0.00063088717,0.0030911912,0.00022621581,0.0030629085,0.0010679967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013145511,0.0006475047,0.00041566376,0.011242345,0.0007223378,0.0010288934,0.001137176,0.00050217105,0.005330673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002853127,0.00035308092,0.00083013915,0.013866303,0.00040735267,0.000725771,0.001298358,0.00043994107,0.0017221719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022077236,0.00009267508,0.82621336,0.0010585528,0.00041972857,0.00036674074,0.00090020074,0.00071008864,0.0004516504,0.00019522636,0.13939261,0.029978331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019375946,0.000012185814,0.9928209,0.000064193824,0.00002899945,0.000036787555,0.00052166113,0.00004536933,0.00006649725,0.0000050115755,0.006388413,0.000008088863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86810344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93230903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13189656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066164336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070573865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2653466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931515937","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8428887","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Open government; Compliance (psychology); Exploratory research","score_opus":0.3536032678883995,"score_gpt":0.4641034051616275,"score_spread":0.110500137273228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931515937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97259325,0.00072041247,0.0010369434,0.003173902,0.00003348292,0.00017499247,0.0017894893,0.000064533,0.020413063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666315,0.00028599883,0.0009315613,0.000118574695,0.00001549982,0.000082366394,0.00061000336,0.000020500369,0.0012723143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9390391,0.012267846,0.004825357,0.00479091,0.031830795,0.0072459783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6709296,0.1431998,0.07322526,0.012502671,0.07810305,0.02203955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03336574,0.00035406486,0.0009853016,0.011724489,0.009833778,0.009612507,0.0021554232,0.0012043357,0.003453297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20970652,0.00040071725,0.0007084946,0.031152869,0.004238712,0.003443979,0.0077298414,0.001769529,0.00038181662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023037259,0.00015192946,0.90375143,0.00029724877,0.00024081835,0.00021101104,0.045046028,0.0010924805,0.0006374614,0.005317591,0.0025735158,0.04045017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028541943,0.000090656984,0.9188358,0.00018860331,0.0001299166,0.00007686961,0.06354775,0.0015546946,0.00073194545,0.0012424989,0.013485237,0.000087418666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8573396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8622287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043420885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09989069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31504202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931550187","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4768663","title":"Review of Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enterococcus faecalis; Club; Chen; Metabolic network; Metabolite","score_opus":0.6443149448925659,"score_gpt":0.496246567241253,"score_spread":0.14806837765131292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931550187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029068731,0.67353624,0.0898736,0.09385224,0.11284824,0.0011169708,0.003420719,0.0021961366,0.020249102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033218507,0.75545245,0.063319154,0.04243999,0.054425374,0.0022738497,0.006625966,0.0018694352,0.040375326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774761,0.0069224113,0.0018918108,0.0021333767,0.010944299,0.0006320717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84107983,0.033393238,0.008648517,0.010294109,0.100482024,0.006102333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030985292,0.0010955256,0.002503076,0.008272587,0.0023247302,0.005625027,0.0044361316,0.0035473327,0.01087221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07842217,0.001507888,0.0024636502,0.004440904,0.0036660014,0.004822311,0.00392755,0.0048282575,0.010563604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014520598,0.00004390885,0.00076238794,0.017681066,0.0006139762,0.00032509878,0.0006316417,0.0010599461,0.0067324177,0.01799158,0.6377385,0.31627426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024025641,0.00010233792,0.00093289505,0.003115926,0.00026645788,0.0003922722,0.0001507993,0.0006194448,0.0022307779,0.010633111,0.9814497,0.000082115555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018697894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031672658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030985292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003217085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128234895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16386789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931974892","doi":"10.5683/sp3/pdzqmg","title":"Demo: Questions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.46743207111117513,"score_gpt":0.5929958498575951,"score_spread":0.12556377874642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931974892","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015356326,0.000114618015,0.0005093046,0.0006940421,0.00011200208,0.000093704926,0.989195,0.001348792,0.0063969535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072667697,0.000098592755,0.0028206732,0.0005473253,0.000039348088,0.000572989,0.9831617,0.0004322933,0.0050603463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.0006020882,0.0002268666,0.00057240063,0.0005177908,0.00043808448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432445,0.0026750367,0.00035392307,0.001399217,0.00086161343,0.000385781],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019459003,0.0019992867,0.00079373666,0.0032319422,0.0013222496,0.003238913,0.0014539106,0.0023299416,0.11888218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017573796,0.0005617212,0.0014594474,0.0037393442,0.0009927257,0.0022424904,0.0026153976,0.0021189859,0.06696787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015604397,0.000048639635,0.002852081,0.00052432984,0.000017947836,0.000034237404,0.000160255,0.000572682,0.00018476242,0.0034141222,0.98741186,0.0046230247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003374797,0.00003275115,0.004666714,0.00029749438,0.000021604354,0.00009413105,0.00069659244,0.0016131563,0.0011108016,0.010456199,0.9806349,0.0000381091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023438245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043388188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020425238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028664635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3977005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939288627","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12703760.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Inclusion (mineral); Diagram; Data flow diagram; File format","score_opus":0.9313384607065003,"score_gpt":0.6506207366814617,"score_spread":0.2807177240250386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939288627","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024334299,0.000022608989,0.0005362242,0.00019049512,0.000046094057,0.00038430237,0.99569076,0.00034371397,0.0025423595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011009973,0.00026493042,0.011352405,0.0009302191,0.00025324695,0.011547527,0.93597627,0.0018196799,0.026845701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950741,0.0013643556,0.0009960381,0.00076491194,0.0014171487,0.000383372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8231749,0.13011776,0.00913505,0.007807488,0.027434476,0.0023304708],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651987,0.0010670339,0.0012576387,0.0066444543,0.0015955368,0.0028663778,0.0020201048,0.0013181393,0.873909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11682104,0.0007120374,0.0008400461,0.011060227,0.00037594093,0.0030193455,0.0017569202,0.0012797823,0.21234645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014098444,0.00006497953,0.0014991207,0.0019541746,0.000022214736,0.000018127455,0.00009267923,0.0001434638,0.000040266525,0.00073522876,0.9858686,0.009420123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018552259,0.00020052152,0.027524855,0.0036320286,0.0001601723,0.00020867054,0.0009867216,0.0010627535,0.00056453666,0.010801996,0.9528494,0.00015302403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009015664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015771559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025578714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004976552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17985344},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6939753027","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.27938184","title":"A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-influential papers in the field of anti-diabetic drugs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Citation; Citation analysis; Web of science; Field (mathematics); Original research","score_opus":0.28388004818971097,"score_gpt":0.5198092564578533,"score_spread":0.2359292082681423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939753027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68719995,0.0885227,0.009175618,0.0055109006,0.0010166087,0.0043032523,0.1454461,0.0013044947,0.05752028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8633143,0.0403871,0.034030356,0.0004268426,0.0011853708,0.0038796968,0.051859707,0.00021471079,0.0047020237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816939,0.0031125783,0.0056084306,0.0013638895,0.0075998954,0.0006213217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9151898,0.046235897,0.0153594725,0.0020989226,0.019786099,0.0013297244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014113507,0.0013376279,0.0029094839,0.22388065,0.0021139123,0.006794413,0.001562403,0.0010728785,0.0077090776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080177,0.0005004415,0.004048954,0.21007004,0.0009230404,0.0048536616,0.0026246894,0.0007552782,0.0020587856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015522586,0.00051859056,0.40977198,0.04869031,0.007965065,0.0013052232,0.0051141116,0.0032897342,0.0042410092,0.006046133,0.05623592,0.45526978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036642564,0.0007005304,0.8466322,0.008696806,0.008095618,0.0030444574,0.009610054,0.009728945,0.0038605956,0.008201325,0.10063807,0.00042507902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053666066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006457151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033402788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046959156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074640214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943892931","doi":"10.17613/t8999-0m368","title":"Scholarly Communication and Its Infrastructures (panel introduction)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Information and Communications Technology; Key (lock); Context (archaeology); Information Dissemination","score_opus":0.3354484500528461,"score_gpt":0.4272444462727673,"score_spread":0.09179599621992118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943892931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014337234,0.0041841622,0.0009582607,0.7417571,0.15083392,0.0013021654,0.010294947,0.0002534185,0.08898241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077581108,0.0036072738,0.0012956681,0.60656226,0.060371105,0.0019273187,0.0042206333,0.0002974775,0.31396016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580306,0.0005373033,0.0002299279,0.0006629654,0.0019051523,0.0008615946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342544,0.0069431267,0.00083800184,0.0005565926,0.0055220826,0.0027147792],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009714039,0.00097358326,0.0007099691,0.0017371353,0.0053554694,0.0068885023,0.0023121554,0.020231554,0.06401454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018615032,0.0007011162,0.0013714319,0.002791159,0.0012634353,0.00437188,0.0035933482,0.015639318,0.023985565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011257333,0.00000772933,0.000041791096,0.00004367915,0.000001350172,0.000018788998,0.00004526165,0.000012982505,0.000100061545,0.0004995735,0.9980159,0.0012016654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023537517,0.000013731799,0.0018384978,0.00026057273,0.000009780907,0.000010905461,0.0002717638,0.000033928467,0.0002036772,0.0008106257,0.99649835,0.000024493147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029524552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049024537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00931773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21414995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943918776","doi":"10.17613/196v7-d0t88","title":"The value of data and other non-traditional scholarly outputs in academic review, promotion, and tenure in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Higher education; Empirical research","score_opus":0.4506510134796159,"score_gpt":0.4351968633074922,"score_spread":0.015454150172123704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943918776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81372774,0.016448723,0.0022645197,0.05069121,0.00047638154,0.00038049745,0.003423421,0.000350581,0.112236924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775109,0.007533575,0.0028688419,0.0024863144,0.00007228025,0.0000649509,0.0007802531,0.000098781915,0.008584087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9106833,0.014981885,0.0054697455,0.0031853952,0.0565531,0.009126446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7160827,0.065629356,0.023452332,0.008364232,0.15048231,0.035989095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033407874,0.00044617627,0.00092274003,0.018531363,0.023578031,0.022768956,0.0029678915,0.0015481005,0.001352313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14662111,0.00072689407,0.00047516916,0.038919214,0.0115354275,0.004267985,0.011071581,0.0021378368,0.00028091713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038782574,0.00020741172,0.36817965,0.0017060004,0.00020025413,0.001314251,0.21707658,0.0014174588,0.0027409883,0.04994079,0.0428739,0.31395483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036163718,0.00011615643,0.6053333,0.0016436854,0.00012638445,0.0004794584,0.19207282,0.0013854993,0.0027229153,0.003987166,0.19169469,0.00040175184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99254864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19334358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4037496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93560714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944010102","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/axmjz","title":"Roles and responsibilities when leading consensus meetings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Process (computing); Grey literature; Inclusion (mineral); Citation; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5268593757873624,"score_gpt":0.5962216561772558,"score_spread":0.06936228038989334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944010102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2662568,0.03699206,0.2140968,0.09640248,0.008489466,0.02308625,0.004565886,0.0020706619,0.3480396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7641113,0.012086641,0.19258909,0.004042254,0.00093978853,0.008917422,0.002204854,0.000565421,0.014543297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6044488,0.2935853,0.039316814,0.007624056,0.04665928,0.0083657615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47365126,0.31179628,0.054183252,0.019176723,0.11252531,0.028667167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2519595,0.0009416859,0.0018315006,0.019622775,0.009156613,0.024216391,0.004198692,0.0042474074,0.0141986655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47867993,0.0014739716,0.0019317231,0.016411128,0.0049035694,0.017463254,0.0151240565,0.0039079185,0.0049070376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012349214,0.00033055065,0.055613838,0.014239636,0.00058382313,0.00094863307,0.10153949,0.0011881776,0.0019675123,0.07256773,0.057080884,0.6927048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005862084,0.00084510795,0.07448108,0.027740616,0.0010794154,0.0017198982,0.2039878,0.0040149097,0.0047009583,0.1643045,0.5158328,0.00070670363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003326024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005801517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7480405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009355258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037647538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9224671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945417661","doi":"10.22034/jkrs.2024.63510.1108","title":"The participation of International Authors in Journals indexed in Islamic World Science Citation Database (ISC)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Descriptive statistics; Citation; Islam; China; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.3059271438834543,"score_gpt":0.4890691025125425,"score_spread":0.18314195862908816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945417661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95636725,0.013837829,0.0010634629,0.0014225347,0.00019208292,0.00007619342,0.00445779,0.000039917297,0.022542858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922463,0.0037151915,0.00080067187,0.00008609609,0.0002495168,0.00005342444,0.0018467794,0.000009162325,0.0009929339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866709,0.0027317065,0.0027598557,0.0012758572,0.0057886224,0.0007731089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981656,0.04111334,0.03771136,0.0033852216,0.015070782,0.0045536524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104384795,0.00043979453,0.0006601432,0.027275309,0.0011101263,0.0062617995,0.00077460706,0.00063306204,0.0025903892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051091406,0.0001394397,0.00058640365,0.04793652,0.0009070993,0.0039902194,0.0027033018,0.0005280841,0.0007472724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007463979,0.000070958864,0.9467661,0.0007499097,0.00017677931,0.00018137305,0.0034418232,0.0002420392,0.00037010654,0.0010580107,0.001622301,0.045245916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011297559,0.000104742096,0.9644079,0.0005569995,0.00023180478,0.0011407351,0.010884098,0.00068004883,0.0009627155,0.0014581905,0.019529443,0.000032019656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014142253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00207909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011262392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029360084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05520463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945697183","doi":"10.25547/3xdw-4b96","title":"Le libre accès dans les sciences humaines au Canada : une conversation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Textual Cultures Lab","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human science; Conversation; Portrait; Emic and etic","score_opus":0.16176292211199744,"score_gpt":0.4612688097973625,"score_spread":0.29950588768536507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945697183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0133202,0.03943211,0.0007275429,0.845499,0.0054392447,0.00004015171,0.00018218884,0.000060771472,0.095298775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42187163,0.06608677,0.0017435777,0.29662332,0.002389778,0.00013832173,0.00017402253,0.0002820363,0.21069054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793155,0.0031104402,0.000411598,0.0009165833,0.0036035043,0.0040262556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751728,0.0073432294,0.0006923109,0.00038250763,0.0060941493,0.010315107],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011757553,0.0006690966,0.001214184,0.0029074992,0.06096551,0.02669875,0.0025905308,0.013063824,0.023261983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017145945,0.00076750264,0.0005309636,0.008428693,0.034343235,0.010511907,0.012016625,0.015251056,0.0018578396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009871428,0.00007513876,0.002791101,0.0006841221,0.000028533088,0.0017827002,0.2887341,0.0001579527,0.0007735617,0.16487902,0.49680993,0.043185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008128647,0.000007459038,0.0016005212,0.0004361198,0.000008482536,0.0000939892,0.13655254,0.000045351837,0.00009136474,0.0037125587,0.85739416,0.00004946213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98282385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99740946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18559007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31002071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6950491719","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6363344","title":"Bibliometria","year":2022,"lang":"ca","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Presentation (obstetrics); Architecture","score_opus":0.4596402214548644,"score_gpt":0.44820902761428033,"score_spread":0.011431193840584053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6950491719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002924715,0.008901267,0.024635032,0.0049466174,0.0024652046,0.00039497888,0.0351787,0.0040936084,0.91645986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13248089,0.03470309,0.07229332,0.0038098942,0.003668894,0.0014826182,0.07608684,0.004312168,0.67116237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883183,0.002374093,0.0015117287,0.0019978175,0.0053044762,0.0004935176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864086,0.0027376818,0.0011022041,0.003191725,0.0060860696,0.00047377663],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037972701,0.0013667165,0.0015529897,0.019535627,0.0037641977,0.018229863,0.0024356872,0.002212465,0.2069414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025783405,0.00075037975,0.0011712746,0.037032627,0.0025358747,0.008416072,0.0049465913,0.0022404075,0.11104122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011487838,0.00004316703,0.0033402403,0.0019406724,0.000118274795,0.0001749052,0.0013223297,0.0014613703,0.00043995428,0.33851507,0.35115615,0.30137303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064546116,0.000007521382,0.0010647959,0.00028022335,0.000013600786,0.00011380774,0.0003060926,0.00023033316,0.00016156564,0.014772536,0.983023,0.000020086574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015644824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011822309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00630013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008950707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6922879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957921271","doi":"10.60692/334bv-cx045","title":"Understanding the structure, characteristics, and future of collective intelligence using local and global bibliometric analyses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Collective intelligence; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Scientometrics","score_opus":0.6239676538400103,"score_gpt":0.47354080569349677,"score_spread":0.15042684814651353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957921271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.879528,0.0033459575,0.03764593,0.006328697,0.000042959542,0.0001078497,0.00030019967,0.00012419237,0.07257621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526936,0.00056884845,0.0034597153,0.00005769335,0.0000374114,0.000028462284,0.00007070052,0.0000104266555,0.0004973039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681574,0.0012829134,0.00016845237,0.00048579823,0.0009237743,0.00032324155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97719043,0.012675781,0.0056320387,0.001367348,0.0020200398,0.001114367],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009077125,0.00026936588,0.00076280144,0.018672848,0.0019259279,0.010592285,0.000688505,0.00074861414,0.001916729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02484293,0.00027032476,0.00053152035,0.016989466,0.0057642977,0.018272517,0.0036868155,0.0009158219,0.00023617162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014501465,0.00011992231,0.38399777,0.00062995515,0.00032838056,0.00040118492,0.037232254,0.0072670327,0.002354122,0.40612698,0.0021557075,0.1592417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002992775,0.00013765767,0.38626084,0.00039439564,0.00014771498,0.00042031435,0.051383138,0.03359844,0.001193422,0.50785273,0.018464604,0.000116784664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025169118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032120033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003460219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018231545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048005044},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6958598632","doi":"10.60692/shhbe-5st07","title":"Challenging the \"old boys club\" in academia: Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Editorial board; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Impact factor; Public health; Citation; Gender diversity; Environmental epidemiology; Location","score_opus":0.5157832682160188,"score_gpt":0.4533655330304372,"score_spread":0.062417735185581635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958598632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97309387,0.0064877304,0.0014219572,0.00584907,0.0009519132,0.00016089507,0.00066012103,0.0000531012,0.011321295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941649,0.0013084229,0.0008144363,0.0010150996,0.0006325714,0.000099296885,0.0001729674,0.00003115197,0.0017610785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544875,0.023546325,0.004966623,0.004157184,0.009562818,0.0032794864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7559193,0.1193577,0.0799709,0.0065990444,0.018885318,0.019267699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03199521,0.0003325377,0.0006787666,0.008433138,0.003762024,0.007663379,0.0013099631,0.00097611407,0.005138314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14900923,0.00037135338,0.00038451634,0.0067542763,0.0029395898,0.003876083,0.004326625,0.00079295906,0.00081965985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009209411,0.00017413919,0.7548261,0.0011226096,0.0002066298,0.0013051463,0.10499799,0.000103279584,0.0014943396,0.0027116654,0.014002422,0.11813471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497956,0.00023049982,0.81168884,0.0010864811,0.0001050802,0.0015429248,0.14196791,0.0004197936,0.00063754607,0.0026086105,0.0395735,0.000083737774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002060347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047890404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99156684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016626004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034722527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958677568","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.5331967.v1","title":"Charleston Hyde Park Debate 2017 Opening Statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Statement (logic); Session (web analytics); George (robot); South carolina; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.879765729153358,"score_gpt":0.6524550071459614,"score_spread":0.22731072200739666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958677568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010749445,0.0065132594,0.00043778255,0.51840806,0.09560965,0.0002764646,0.002713034,0.00043349652,0.37453333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008178538,0.0029802937,0.00062760385,0.12586378,0.03135794,0.00057237194,0.0015834563,0.00056348793,0.8282726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855657,0.0014616358,0.00065328047,0.0014011479,0.009074772,0.0018434706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781349,0.0069866017,0.0011123169,0.0022750283,0.0060311323,0.0054600965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013430031,0.0011045897,0.0013135012,0.0024208757,0.00777086,0.028550312,0.0042384686,0.03021889,0.27290186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046383593,0.0010386632,0.0018540694,0.0032402202,0.0047230897,0.007882839,0.009331641,0.019457083,0.17220828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016251679,0.000013824688,0.00004140433,0.00003133504,0.0000021884784,0.00004233401,0.000050336304,0.000011847163,0.000030961328,0.005011415,0.99237496,0.0023731021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076253095,0.000003465493,0.00014593241,0.000086465065,0.0000012025029,0.0000072245534,0.000056137505,0.000011285136,0.00004099845,0.00045323902,0.9991793,0.000007185196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011420734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018660929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27290186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009356089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017695913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91294765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967294049","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10030167","title":"Scale-adjusted metrics of scientific collaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Function (biology); Preference; Index (typography); Comparability","score_opus":0.5188573241778306,"score_gpt":0.4436647591568995,"score_spread":0.07519256502093108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967294049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51593655,0.0015020121,0.45285904,0.0005662199,0.00019884994,0.00045886214,0.0043748994,0.00089626905,0.023207324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90634775,0.00032216072,0.09009215,0.000037767884,0.00008132346,0.00038775447,0.0015703855,0.000076453245,0.0010842099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777986,0.0041311635,0.0015203161,0.0013199706,0.00479315,0.00045557576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598813,0.020923926,0.007156159,0.0051606,0.005659827,0.0012182367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009044274,0.0006066476,0.00075652474,0.015105793,0.0007236528,0.0025290607,0.0009003934,0.00075076206,0.0023552869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07195029,0.000220193,0.0008833745,0.018050808,0.0010980672,0.0055946023,0.0019062833,0.0007186637,0.0005276489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064389716,0.00027901452,0.28096986,0.00092927576,0.0011846747,0.0003606458,0.0043416456,0.061151337,0.010879729,0.16508283,0.0070670135,0.46711004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007278968,0.0009849875,0.437213,0.00017928156,0.00023094818,0.0011867662,0.0041918415,0.24085633,0.007100518,0.28059095,0.026878346,0.0005142892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013177658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013095926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014727069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077086303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047831297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967312700","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10032032","title":"Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literature; Bibliometrics; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Scientific evidence; Scientific progress","score_opus":0.34522479856473925,"score_gpt":0.4207023654068284,"score_spread":0.07547756684208917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967312700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76610804,0.07154372,0.024627049,0.0049222666,0.0010173081,0.0007279235,0.018124498,0.0009498219,0.111979425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520043,0.02409721,0.010215959,0.00013049362,0.0010191019,0.00038466408,0.00783939,0.00019276107,0.0041160774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668815,0.007081253,0.0033307592,0.0014797905,0.020403938,0.0008227855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8590946,0.094726354,0.017663304,0.0052858777,0.020543046,0.002686745],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018305501,0.00065759063,0.0018369316,0.11635282,0.0019835674,0.009256155,0.001186188,0.0011226176,0.004046094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1261615,0.00034096674,0.0013336983,0.2265729,0.0013490757,0.0075432635,0.0036231587,0.0010279818,0.0012381367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046840656,0.00026481255,0.38160542,0.005145247,0.0018058373,0.0007075501,0.006416729,0.005796333,0.0015542109,0.03010135,0.022791864,0.5433423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109891516,0.00047304537,0.76807946,0.0015305674,0.0022156471,0.002722905,0.0076592816,0.020994948,0.0040827515,0.032537457,0.15928333,0.00031079754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002250592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021144294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026910705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023919803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096809864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967628890","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1127701","title":"Mapping The Structure Nose Surgery Discipline In Science Citation Index (Sci) During The Period Of 1999-2012","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Citation; Citation index; Index (typography); Medical record; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.3268955456748074,"score_gpt":0.4315771853947674,"score_spread":0.10468163971996003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967628890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92219913,0.016948774,0.0012125251,0.0011457392,0.00018947828,0.00020861064,0.03743666,0.00015305163,0.020506056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96606445,0.008758962,0.0021347436,0.00007732023,0.00017926062,0.00016034224,0.019788953,0.000022943039,0.002813038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960234,0.00032648005,0.00095512095,0.0003951091,0.0020387294,0.0002611788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882178,0.0022456686,0.0047793416,0.00036546416,0.0039295726,0.00046216906],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026549213,0.0003398842,0.00046275352,0.033735357,0.0005957829,0.0021824224,0.00038326843,0.00032420736,0.0015870527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016072012,0.00012108968,0.00056941377,0.054949135,0.00033767617,0.0015414446,0.0011374787,0.0003262071,0.0005021503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017164041,0.0000658603,0.843076,0.0025320041,0.00020985166,0.0003815581,0.0025415602,0.0008351754,0.0013333604,0.0022013122,0.008061137,0.13859051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002918263,0.000050977775,0.98292994,0.00020184455,0.000060953844,0.00026196564,0.0015724949,0.00039970296,0.0006368167,0.00023491723,0.013633738,0.000013724317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012217261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015569623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96626467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021579836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035336425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02429229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968891630","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6975588","title":"Geographic differences in the uptake of diamond open access and APCs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diamond; Latin Americans; Quality (philosophy); Conversation; Sustainability; Diamond model","score_opus":0.5743677420974477,"score_gpt":0.4965523625336467,"score_spread":0.07781537956380097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968891630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573992,0.0040825866,0.0006156168,0.0020176964,0.00006882195,0.000055483448,0.0017375691,0.000057345496,0.03396581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942912,0.0012635966,0.00035504828,0.00014887578,0.00005253134,0.000019983689,0.00057963695,0.000024368472,0.0032648107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524695,0.0011039035,0.0007061547,0.0006840665,0.00175904,0.0004999747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565786,0.019200312,0.012502327,0.0020607149,0.0069421707,0.002715814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032763414,0.000121040976,0.00030744603,0.0038406716,0.00043965367,0.0022611495,0.0005654837,0.0003811347,0.010944872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029199073,0.00010954368,0.00029484156,0.006071945,0.000781442,0.00162735,0.0014597123,0.00044480016,0.0013509357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043060086,0.00015151288,0.85151035,0.0012060455,0.00029035026,0.00096575974,0.016660044,0.00032981136,0.0032834406,0.008651204,0.0056594587,0.11086139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012773064,0.000095629934,0.96473235,0.00019298204,0.000043625318,0.0008897235,0.011004582,0.000117931115,0.00061912526,0.001004619,0.021258663,0.000027972732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051031006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99943453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006630101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007169176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03661424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969138330","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7331521","title":"Impact of In-text Citations on Journal Rankings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Measure (data warehouse); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking","score_opus":0.3991001087962572,"score_gpt":0.48859647094177083,"score_spread":0.08949636214551365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969138330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72649515,0.024906565,0.02758763,0.03628248,0.008239937,0.00029146424,0.011392144,0.0019661654,0.1628384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807288,0.0026525634,0.002465146,0.0009386409,0.0032690314,0.00004780478,0.0017578667,0.00025280795,0.0078874845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97833383,0.010140898,0.0011098746,0.0008163793,0.008241916,0.0013572464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8157809,0.13483216,0.014198354,0.0058601904,0.02519157,0.0041367747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013989577,0.0007482932,0.0011606744,0.0077093937,0.00091605267,0.007597053,0.0007160218,0.0010941124,0.015172815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16785221,0.00025140986,0.0010201752,0.011862082,0.0011680824,0.003801118,0.0017365202,0.0015415781,0.004459647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027388434,0.0010337459,0.3192867,0.004398122,0.0031247984,0.00080375734,0.0013123399,0.031154774,0.010098881,0.057074208,0.09131208,0.4776617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004346364,0.002294819,0.66789967,0.0012261478,0.002226094,0.000919763,0.0021015832,0.062298592,0.03770743,0.13121542,0.09116979,0.000506089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033608403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038234626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025771898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016973909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07398486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969180740","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7331520","title":"Impact of In-text Citations on Journal Rankings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Measure (data warehouse); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking","score_opus":0.3991001087962572,"score_gpt":0.48859647094177083,"score_spread":0.08949636214551365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969180740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72649515,0.024906565,0.02758763,0.03628248,0.008239937,0.00029146424,0.011392144,0.0019661654,0.1628384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807288,0.0026525634,0.002465146,0.0009386409,0.0032690314,0.00004780478,0.0017578667,0.00025280795,0.0078874845],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97833383,0.010140898,0.0011098746,0.0008163793,0.008241916,0.0013572464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8157809,0.13483216,0.014198354,0.0058601904,0.02519157,0.0041367747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013989577,0.0007482932,0.0011606744,0.0077093937,0.00091605267,0.007597053,0.0007160218,0.0010941124,0.015172815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16785221,0.00025140986,0.0010201752,0.011862082,0.0011680824,0.003801118,0.0017365202,0.0015415781,0.004459647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027388434,0.0010337459,0.3192867,0.004398122,0.0031247984,0.00080375734,0.0013123399,0.031154774,0.010098881,0.057074208,0.09131208,0.4776617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004346364,0.002294819,0.66789967,0.0012261478,0.002226094,0.000919763,0.0021015832,0.062298592,0.03770743,0.13121542,0.09116979,0.000506089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033608403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038234626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025771898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016973909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07398486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969364436","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6128263","title":"Statistics on the papers published in the Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences from 2007 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Duration (music); Publishing; Impact factor","score_opus":0.27967595202343104,"score_gpt":0.40158938821890844,"score_spread":0.1219134361954774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969364436","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01264038,0.17707694,0.0017446266,0.016565675,0.015135583,0.00071955693,0.64488286,0.0021626302,0.12907171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10169964,0.24861844,0.004939013,0.013036602,0.010303504,0.0021681024,0.4753152,0.0015025306,0.14241698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544781,0.0017604919,0.005686814,0.0018611851,0.03384312,0.0023702595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7958897,0.017602509,0.021652164,0.0031770146,0.15001434,0.0116642555],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009358339,0.0015033158,0.0026005805,0.054515403,0.0036683292,0.008993967,0.002233644,0.0014556936,0.038809787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07275723,0.0006205152,0.0027615724,0.080885015,0.0015972668,0.0028427893,0.0023858142,0.002837779,0.022637988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042788312,0.000034087523,0.020157399,0.0070549943,0.0004892214,0.00021358614,0.00023904639,0.0003725323,0.0004704175,0.0049716653,0.8890106,0.07655847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079107,0.00007181176,0.08025154,0.0021501728,0.00039606704,0.0005256499,0.00048419184,0.00027615426,0.00049635815,0.0008161342,0.91432047,0.00013230089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43444192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4084435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017394457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05380706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8638264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976620588","doi":"10.6068/dp14ba834636723","title":"Trend 1982 - 2006. Statistics Canada. CANSIM: Government - Government Business Enterprises | Country: Canada | Table: Federal government business enterprise finance, balance sheet, as at the end of the fiscal year ending closest to December 31 | Variable: Total liabilities, Other financial enterprises | Units: $CAD x 1,000, 1982-2006. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 075-001-105.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic statistics; Government (linguistics); Business statistics; Census; Official statistics; Goods and services; Politics; Fiscal year; Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.05425574895205159,"score_gpt":0.3216861832351012,"score_spread":0.2674304342830496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976620588","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049716287,0.000039095772,0.00001973474,0.00009904148,0.000023323699,0.000010401678,0.99878377,0.000055290784,0.00091956335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007558674,0.00022872536,0.00030126228,0.00011050872,0.000016438913,0.00008513245,0.99395627,0.0000954723,0.004450346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960532,0.0002027639,0.0003665136,0.0005085069,0.0019023825,0.00096654677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678532,0.0009866087,0.0009920138,0.00096540916,0.027696867,0.0015059918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001749115,0.002424754,0.0024722973,0.009184299,0.0036567075,0.005069879,0.0047482545,0.001492126,0.09363005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016219625,0.0017340702,0.0017349933,0.043204926,0.0006319571,0.0026667921,0.0021724643,0.00305379,0.06652485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017548418,0.0000053825433,0.0008215473,0.00016385628,0.000012590181,0.00000610334,0.00001784938,0.00008499179,0.000008322435,0.0003617967,0.9971559,0.0013440897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009350661,0.00000871725,0.01893589,0.00056477386,0.00004092652,0.000020561785,0.00038140637,0.00034413845,0.00016079008,0.0005426909,0.978839,0.000067517365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99451715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09363005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05187602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13109642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37638867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976629300","doi":"10.60692/bz342-dd882","title":"Candidate Markers Associated with the Probability of Future Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis Patients","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cystic fibrosis; C-reactive protein; Prospective cohort study; Cohort; Respiratory disease; Cohort study; Risk factor; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Biomarker; Disease","score_opus":0.1299720237287391,"score_gpt":0.3405012280144234,"score_spread":0.2105292042856843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976629300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911565,0.00048495486,0.00009582411,0.000033800137,0.0000038127594,0.000005663959,0.00009040832,0.000002758633,0.00016707082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962354,0.00007978848,0.00009393592,0.000013127156,0.000007488457,0.0000047530216,0.0001171622,6.950035e-7,0.00005952436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975115,0.00006900285,0.000039001152,0.00005612589,0.00003946747,0.000045357647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878913,0.00033966434,0.0005138877,0.000052262647,0.00010343219,0.00020160105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037838655,0.00030361852,0.00047800696,0.0005432617,0.00035060468,0.0004838009,0.00018324511,0.00063316466,0.0008578986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022848675,0.00019091272,0.00038715932,0.00052546436,0.00015808824,0.0002991434,0.00024633593,0.00059795997,0.00014279236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017851725,0.000024907084,0.99813145,0.000006426201,0.000022740489,0.00008209738,0.000019265473,0.00005687929,0.00033976615,0.0000066266,0.00003093072,0.0011003445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045287006,0.00012754336,0.998887,0.0000049481573,0.000025788913,0.00029496965,0.000048152793,0.00041511632,0.00009356106,0.000022671573,0.00007274344,0.0000030640151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013397257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012409845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013397257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018559204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017550796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002869904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976895578","doi":"10.60692/wv1da-v7405","title":"Challenging the \"old boys club\" in academia: Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Editorial board; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Impact factor; Public health; Citation; Gender diversity; Environmental epidemiology; Location","score_opus":0.5157832682160188,"score_gpt":0.4533655330304372,"score_spread":0.062417735185581635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976895578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97309387,0.0064877304,0.0014219572,0.00584907,0.0009519132,0.00016089507,0.00066012103,0.0000531012,0.011321295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941649,0.0013084229,0.0008144363,0.0010150996,0.0006325714,0.000099296885,0.0001729674,0.00003115197,0.0017610785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544875,0.023546325,0.004966623,0.004157184,0.009562818,0.0032794864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7559193,0.1193577,0.0799709,0.0065990444,0.018885318,0.019267699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03199521,0.0003325377,0.0006787666,0.008433138,0.003762024,0.007663379,0.0013099631,0.00097611407,0.005138314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14900923,0.00037135338,0.00038451634,0.0067542763,0.0029395898,0.003876083,0.004326625,0.00079295906,0.00081965985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009209411,0.00017413919,0.7548261,0.0011226096,0.0002066298,0.0013051463,0.10499799,0.000103279584,0.0014943396,0.0027116654,0.014002422,0.11813471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005497956,0.00023049982,0.81168884,0.0010864811,0.0001050802,0.0015429248,0.14196791,0.0004197936,0.00063754607,0.0026086105,0.0395735,0.000083737774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002060347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047890404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99156684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016626004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034722527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977353442","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25264615.v1","title":"Research Output of Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS): A Bibliometric Analysis from 1993-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Information science; Information system; National library","score_opus":0.5917176489081988,"score_gpt":0.541196785067119,"score_spread":0.05052086384107979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977353442","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3126051,0.044435997,0.0016556167,0.028886106,0.0014632436,0.00031684525,0.46878043,0.0009665779,0.14089015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74172634,0.033901196,0.00527496,0.0012679375,0.0007180417,0.00022082317,0.1948809,0.00031967653,0.021690117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834541,0.00053363224,0.0010806337,0.00057452125,0.0130778635,0.001279147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732328,0.002287703,0.0025600106,0.0003981913,0.02022844,0.001292823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006049617,0.0007608863,0.0007988494,0.059476666,0.0034393163,0.0063041165,0.0011501488,0.00079930894,0.003601595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027813887,0.0002663156,0.0008239696,0.13389711,0.0009796331,0.0021785311,0.0015794014,0.0008940043,0.0015931543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039961035,0.00011586371,0.3156595,0.004559593,0.0005032454,0.00057975686,0.0063720495,0.0018172215,0.0010923587,0.010749506,0.3118667,0.34628463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009026359,0.000032043794,0.8007891,0.00038413206,0.00015559894,0.00015441955,0.0030834577,0.00044313923,0.0012555539,0.00029637772,0.19331121,0.00008583096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90245354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92437845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99395037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038462367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04363759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2790653},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6980087666","doi":"","title":"Assessing COVID-19 Research Outputs of Iran’s Top Universities in Social Media: An Altmetric Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Shahid; Altmetrics; Social media; Descriptive statistics; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Population; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.9412555029710544,"score_gpt":0.7885958834143622,"score_spread":0.15265961955669227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980087666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755415,0.00084878755,0.001627827,0.00059990893,0.00005028154,0.00017295964,0.0070257867,0.00008532037,0.01404764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926456,0.00041565925,0.0021090775,0.000036246543,0.00007648918,0.00018724137,0.0037254072,0.000015161194,0.00078913366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937256,0.0010450631,0.0011161141,0.00036255768,0.0033754425,0.00037524733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656701,0.011173971,0.012785706,0.0011104966,0.0077366848,0.0015230904],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071015474,0.0005300195,0.0005218079,0.023325996,0.0008715364,0.004046436,0.0006143168,0.00047744092,0.0022867585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029935673,0.00014178819,0.00068698084,0.031707525,0.00086679624,0.002423548,0.0028703094,0.00051830226,0.0005733742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099212906,0.00010174018,0.9521889,0.00045173956,0.00015552097,0.0001721017,0.0024081073,0.00048595187,0.00032856103,0.0015071454,0.0025387497,0.039562207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010159815,0.0001314065,0.977205,0.00014538497,0.000105735824,0.00027787947,0.010344142,0.0022689868,0.0008133059,0.0008651575,0.0078007663,0.000032044718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023480353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024646278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99289846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014260196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016320507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037557065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981652213","doi":"","title":"Étude comparative des modes d'acculturation chez des étudiants étrangers provenant d'une société individualiste et d'une société collectiviste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling error; Ethnic discrimination; Mode (computer interface)","score_opus":0.20536556049313584,"score_gpt":0.39814361011624533,"score_spread":0.1927780496231095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981652213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984841,0.00027989023,0.00007459067,0.000030903517,0.0000033447745,0.000013223997,0.000046469162,0.0000010793415,0.0010664891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725515,0.00048590367,0.00018359405,0.00003160711,0.0000043014516,0.00004345149,0.000091274436,0.0000023013563,0.0019024125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897003,0.0004351154,0.00006876126,0.0001492966,0.00018188334,0.00019503522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996594,0.0011789368,0.00078515214,0.0001948101,0.0008991848,0.00034778405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015896154,0.000294746,0.0002917186,0.0011309717,0.0017508467,0.0019149227,0.00037392357,0.00037498324,0.0029687933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046498324,0.00027355837,0.00031977438,0.0018369019,0.00085538253,0.0006233084,0.0008533697,0.00046298365,0.00030930937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015340571,0.000097759774,0.87635237,0.0001201276,0.000077707315,0.00021366589,0.10251876,0.00003420957,0.0014557721,0.00029928272,0.00012560243,0.01855132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004884379,0.00016896713,0.9729748,0.000026061265,0.00002474406,0.00012892547,0.024633473,0.000027560067,0.00015841478,0.000025369265,0.0018176977,0.000009261359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11511221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19706054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11511221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012758765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015248597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2288844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982624877","doi":"","title":"The International Development of Open Access Publishing: A Comparative Empirical Analysis Over Seven World&#13;\\nRegions and Nine Academic Disciplines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scopus; Discipline; International development; Publication; Development studies; Open access publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5472215050194077,"score_gpt":0.5591466518126567,"score_spread":0.011925146793248964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982624877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847586,0.0021450792,0.0003042578,0.0002525014,0.000013355145,0.000013573715,0.00080108416,0.000015555157,0.011695963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797815,0.00091724744,0.00015968415,0.00001677911,0.000012760893,0.0000072923544,0.000441735,0.000004965238,0.00046144624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794155,0.0003520766,0.00034692287,0.00031087245,0.00071840885,0.0003301935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775115,0.0073710475,0.01000578,0.0007510789,0.0026437056,0.0017168421],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022140837,0.00015958687,0.00029763224,0.012989654,0.0006583686,0.0041863387,0.00041782667,0.0003129319,0.0035587514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011050368,0.00011516551,0.00044251114,0.025388708,0.0012251368,0.0047967304,0.0022143745,0.00048254168,0.00046359547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008252808,0.00008378167,0.94184995,0.00026104273,0.00018768595,0.00038890023,0.005770845,0.0004907096,0.00041102327,0.0050669285,0.00066246145,0.04474426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003682812,0.000052319134,0.985592,0.00007023315,0.000050896506,0.00025769207,0.009076031,0.0002851766,0.00026902868,0.0004094061,0.003920666,0.0000129392265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039334022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005768437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009541929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010686015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011905193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991094829","doi":"","title":"The evaluation of the biorefinery research: A scientometric approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DSpace (Sirnak University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biorefinery; Incentive; Scopus; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.9046261129120148,"score_gpt":0.6202098476861282,"score_spread":0.2844162652258866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991094829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5785808,0.041725982,0.11893062,0.013851741,0.0012633526,0.0053704823,0.015752515,0.00085664424,0.22366792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94702125,0.009118533,0.035677373,0.00024069277,0.0007485622,0.00120746,0.0033773005,0.00007770372,0.002531076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.923331,0.027760912,0.008635395,0.0028780547,0.03606581,0.0013287629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88203824,0.07996992,0.01350715,0.0043679005,0.018164022,0.0019527194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050687212,0.0012487326,0.0027528205,0.16297825,0.0023886496,0.014462117,0.001564604,0.00156614,0.0040618675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14954588,0.00035687519,0.0021174448,0.21078658,0.0031313805,0.0084580025,0.004149998,0.00086503837,0.0011020147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028657768,0.0004508994,0.27064663,0.00820011,0.0023388474,0.0008016777,0.007454102,0.009776316,0.0016039633,0.06665016,0.012311686,0.6194789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013099273,0.0012756954,0.5677244,0.005529636,0.0023732223,0.0016398549,0.040668998,0.0805609,0.004831242,0.1543023,0.14043328,0.0005294738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032742291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028711406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9493128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00607955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078351665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26806277},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6991528178","doi":"","title":"Health and medical informatics research: Identifying international collaboration patterns at the country and institution level","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scopus; Context (archaeology); Health informatics; Citation; Bibliometrics; Institution; Informatics; Centrality; Citation impact","score_opus":0.40946899275156406,"score_gpt":0.554792245777516,"score_spread":0.1453232530259519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991528178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445238,0.008137785,0.011047904,0.0014198505,0.00007064285,0.00020330526,0.007189605,0.00013009798,0.027277077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870946,0.0019669705,0.007967253,0.00007893111,0.000060904356,0.00016164858,0.0019978094,0.000020695752,0.00065115246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951918,0.0017067526,0.0009705757,0.00074622507,0.001045407,0.00033928314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600867,0.019804591,0.014413107,0.0014230213,0.003175267,0.0010973063],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006604075,0.00033662916,0.0005551195,0.03837529,0.0007735179,0.004644294,0.00047510353,0.0005468696,0.003617761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029580688,0.0001445977,0.0006044348,0.06494688,0.0006946606,0.0043158294,0.002815578,0.00032778239,0.0005220904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081391285,0.000060605715,0.8884107,0.0016050396,0.0004060996,0.0002723272,0.004423878,0.0012123658,0.0011157175,0.0073701283,0.0018106912,0.093231134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001708102,0.00012995391,0.9421659,0.001059509,0.00033900712,0.0008263718,0.018504415,0.0044999127,0.0012078056,0.0073149498,0.023893027,0.000042140076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023950543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038991282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96162474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010509674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001836873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034926116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991634660","doi":"","title":"Health Hacks #217: Research behind magic mushrooms to treat depression","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Depression (economics); Health care; Magic bullet; Great Depression","score_opus":0.20965280692400548,"score_gpt":0.4524556190828035,"score_spread":0.24280281215879804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991634660","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026039938,0.14240128,0.00029458568,0.5717535,0.011446748,0.00022618288,0.010514312,0.0003226227,0.2604368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036243606,0.36188287,0.0016112973,0.30453992,0.017432341,0.0005402896,0.005874142,0.000443827,0.2714317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997214,0.0011410499,0.00018726045,0.00013849538,0.0009887647,0.00033042007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97473395,0.014764764,0.00145751,0.00087509205,0.004865823,0.0033028324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004792037,0.0003754853,0.00060307013,0.0035629866,0.002242883,0.005958557,0.0010071041,0.0033838719,0.11258653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023442365,0.00024202185,0.00080906367,0.0064077456,0.0022789694,0.003304281,0.0019552398,0.003033053,0.019664126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109831235,0.000047108264,0.0005161982,0.001000548,0.0000249325,0.000048106845,0.00012261653,0.000014035623,0.00009647367,0.006826888,0.8587948,0.13239841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015295092,0.00016606372,0.0042628623,0.0040281964,0.00009956105,0.0000581806,0.0006043667,0.000044339038,0.00036138855,0.0077946,0.9824044,0.000022960643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03307615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10181395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11258653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038316515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008125335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3766395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996401681","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Communication at the University of Mauritius: Case Study Report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Mauritius Research Council; International Development Research Centre; Tertiary Education Commission","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Information and Communications Technology; Technical communication; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Communication studies","score_opus":0.313594323291349,"score_gpt":0.43642719726890483,"score_spread":0.12283287397755582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996401681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335737,0.004156481,0.0010001804,0.00826366,0.0002263148,0.0002907265,0.00016182044,0.000054461714,0.052272532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856521,0.0027932422,0.0009004468,0.0005040297,0.00017295052,0.00011373665,0.000048045174,0.000015527856,0.009800024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581414,0.0019875714,0.0002479142,0.00020956021,0.0008883172,0.00085253397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373674,0.0030449545,0.0013983513,0.00027524115,0.00038982977,0.0011548083],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021906935,0.00055161415,0.00043230355,0.0042103548,0.012474412,0.003827186,0.002059157,0.0039289827,0.0059190374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012765352,0.00027604733,0.0004061896,0.0061188885,0.0049023596,0.0014889175,0.0047100466,0.0015747037,0.0008325835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010763029,0.00043522398,0.051368687,0.0011859679,0.00005059302,0.37069237,0.4594342,0.00094384863,0.0019327197,0.02988895,0.0140384,0.06992142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002328275,0.0002623159,0.06677701,0.001639262,0.00007103435,0.21167807,0.5178482,0.0011268739,0.0034436593,0.0032184478,0.19381438,0.000097487326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034450684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056324996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006816332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044674487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06850028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998924911","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Open Access Digital Humanities Publications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Bibliometrics; Digital scholarship; Digital library; Web of science; Scientometrics; Digital preservation; Digital collections","score_opus":0.7161193792084019,"score_gpt":0.57432565306417,"score_spread":0.1417937261442318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998924911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8928042,0.006432954,0.0047919033,0.0009380285,0.00015370891,0.0003350641,0.0261972,0.00037114113,0.06797583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668683,0.0044235643,0.004932309,0.00006263572,0.00031157944,0.00036096867,0.015961215,0.000051396375,0.0070282146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98577154,0.0017702829,0.0017971587,0.0005910963,0.009550205,0.00051980815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96932214,0.01150272,0.007950631,0.0013996647,0.009200175,0.0006246669],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038745056,0.00030557782,0.0007844656,0.10271092,0.0011760971,0.0043629827,0.0006433158,0.00036647983,0.0040113507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03220748,0.00012641297,0.0007115083,0.14058493,0.00056248734,0.0023913407,0.001980825,0.00035601412,0.0012490483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000201882,0.00026080935,0.6660195,0.0019148669,0.0004053317,0.00039651847,0.0042142845,0.0029852176,0.0027566473,0.0117298085,0.009688428,0.29942676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016948436,0.00014328564,0.930144,0.00038038765,0.00016103295,0.00072967145,0.00852601,0.005951161,0.003456932,0.0035878867,0.046844225,0.00005837792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072685797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007879841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026315765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029893138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020490587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998945594","doi":"","title":"Canadian Solar Publishes 2021 Corporate Sustainability Report","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Corporate sustainability","score_opus":0.4524526052326481,"score_gpt":0.5213108519337256,"score_spread":0.06885824670107754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998945594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013689089,0.0029429782,0.00057740824,0.01438207,0.006718419,0.00025083672,0.100654215,0.002378849,0.87072635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002712073,0.0011527024,0.0005164278,0.0008077084,0.00030010619,0.0000343144,0.015610891,0.0005093052,0.9783564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273515,0.00013075091,0.00011237816,0.00024084577,0.0061495407,0.00063119375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870979,0.00040413727,0.00019583286,0.0004249185,0.01021806,0.0016591528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023652497,0.0015645415,0.0010882065,0.008559613,0.0053967093,0.010595588,0.0017398844,0.0035235707,0.34994072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009019402,0.0005980381,0.0010988362,0.0104089035,0.0011559443,0.001753247,0.0017797864,0.0023343195,0.16437134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014663774,0.000012756057,0.00017190914,0.000041540956,0.0000035268417,0.000011854378,0.000011642024,0.000060689177,0.0000474988,0.0024952127,0.9837572,0.013371519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007735612,0.000003748872,0.001231746,0.000027528053,0.0000036235892,0.0000049590603,0.00003636303,0.00009582402,0.0001328013,0.0005182722,0.9979291,0.000008198509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9406015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34994072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035882816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113328606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92723066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999185672","doi":"","title":"Canadian Solar Publishes Its 2020 Sustainability Report","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Sustainable development","score_opus":0.41558015040362,"score_gpt":0.5565792704804543,"score_spread":0.1409991200768343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999185672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024058765,0.0035311535,0.0009725293,0.030933872,0.009798906,0.0002763966,0.09335843,0.0028296548,0.85589325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055374512,0.0021179356,0.0012678665,0.002185657,0.00045628785,0.000047296868,0.019812502,0.0006829654,0.96789205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924965,0.00014557716,0.00011041327,0.0001774551,0.0064163757,0.00065372296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830656,0.0005279797,0.0002134397,0.00041148992,0.013410572,0.0023709112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032612092,0.0013313973,0.00084228313,0.0072281603,0.005379618,0.008672947,0.00160279,0.003376431,0.19652818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009974775,0.00046049047,0.0011925283,0.009107783,0.0012637904,0.0015189832,0.0018704864,0.00202487,0.0738556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016625363,0.000014453418,0.0003084406,0.000045356494,0.0000052138057,0.000014103654,0.000014900107,0.00009266968,0.000058613434,0.0030334739,0.9795267,0.016869437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072918274,0.0000034558984,0.0013079487,0.000024560306,0.000004473071,0.0000054910633,0.000052481984,0.000101511614,0.0001259041,0.0005556699,0.9978023,0.000008923106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9662939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19652818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041105416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16428299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6574522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999428235","doi":"","title":"A century of peer-reviewed Australian Zoological Research: Prominent authors, themes and usage of papers from Australian Zoologist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic Entomology; Headline; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Statistician; Ceylon","score_opus":0.6906917136886692,"score_gpt":0.5524235651333328,"score_spread":0.13826814855533642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999428235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0682449,0.6433817,0.0048769303,0.1400119,0.034716036,0.00047712147,0.001808812,0.00041826948,0.106064245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39920044,0.47691464,0.012330631,0.032858137,0.019909322,0.00056090904,0.0019850037,0.00089128135,0.055349685],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9431081,0.010990935,0.006665577,0.0035240394,0.033792514,0.0019188871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76613015,0.056226302,0.027749635,0.009351825,0.1134272,0.027114889],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038899295,0.0005572219,0.0013876435,0.025110172,0.0069636675,0.024326738,0.0017364481,0.0028244576,0.008696186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117897555,0.00065650453,0.00059909886,0.043866944,0.0062526353,0.013642411,0.008742396,0.0026244272,0.0031949424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019168842,0.00008772027,0.014220395,0.018743074,0.00020911024,0.0023708756,0.18833695,0.00014559957,0.005181939,0.020269984,0.23718618,0.5130566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008756295,0.000056835266,0.037282825,0.0066805333,0.00004151278,0.0014661665,0.023695245,0.00006448183,0.00027385273,0.002238266,0.9281188,0.00007262169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011241444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014969604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008215418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026161293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20572156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999497510","doi":"","title":"Contribution of Annals of Library and Information Studies in SCOPUS database (2011-2021): An analysis Bibliomatrice study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annals; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Information center; Medical journal; Rank (graph theory)","score_opus":0.42896879734758064,"score_gpt":0.5090526222409143,"score_spread":0.08008382489333365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999497510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85860187,0.026203522,0.0008628386,0.0031358683,0.00029706742,0.00025806256,0.050445095,0.00023579157,0.059959903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96272576,0.011184808,0.0010989628,0.00017095708,0.00032514863,0.00014378385,0.017685661,0.000077380784,0.006587561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891403,0.0014451484,0.0019937505,0.0005446503,0.0060886433,0.00078759505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702721,0.009378458,0.006299585,0.000890925,0.011591164,0.0015677117],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00544788,0.00043360525,0.00082262227,0.07569183,0.0014939201,0.007149149,0.0005670903,0.00052280456,0.005791457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034225114,0.0002201611,0.00096207374,0.12182719,0.00042881197,0.0023805061,0.0026444383,0.00044267802,0.0022898645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024404709,0.00014677295,0.8032623,0.0037076622,0.00071079115,0.0012762902,0.0028285496,0.00043478265,0.0010769885,0.0033608181,0.025304852,0.1576461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012049319,0.00007567621,0.9320558,0.00084722386,0.0005358814,0.0013886476,0.00474106,0.0006944297,0.0007855184,0.00047342738,0.058354553,0.00003580785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082518915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013930923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9243082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042885765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028811514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008656605","doi":"","title":"1896 Chap. 0446. An Act Making Further Provision For The Protection Of The Public Health In The Valleys Of The Concord And Sudbury Rivers.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Legislation","score_opus":0.13176895031017297,"score_gpt":0.37272086910253516,"score_spread":0.2409519187923622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008656605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008600061,0.009322396,0.00041593562,0.02029282,0.0030581157,0.00017729822,0.0066488585,0.00023315813,0.95899147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003849763,0.0020000602,0.00039446654,0.02220531,0.0008118267,0.00027747612,0.0008137599,0.00010175012,0.96954554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976393,0.0003404729,0.0001927068,0.0002339225,0.0011145396,0.0004790307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835664,0.00046526088,0.00012125231,0.000108072905,0.00080114725,0.0001475461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019429298,0.0013271214,0.00059308176,0.002054204,0.007678799,0.0040890016,0.0018472405,0.013213524,0.093808845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957911,0.0010382863,0.00074648595,0.0031873006,0.001951395,0.0019434884,0.0019904105,0.0074887495,0.07418099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016614573,0.000015899463,0.00018974576,0.000056955814,0.0000023163238,0.00005209322,0.00027333343,0.00003220438,0.00006625654,0.024455478,0.96603817,0.008800889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009337877,0.0000069950347,0.0020231165,0.00021623427,0.000003782643,0.00004837375,0.0001634747,0.000023285626,0.00006484312,0.0015855614,0.99583817,0.000016838489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37174648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62208873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37174648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071971333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010518981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7391653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009250478","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Gender and Funding on Research Performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council Canada; National Research Council Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Gender gap; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Grant funding; Citation analysis; Descriptive statistics; Hard and soft science; Impact factor","score_opus":0.33691035291482624,"score_gpt":0.5031213144449854,"score_spread":0.16621096153015918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009250478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285241,0.004355298,0.0013356329,0.0062770084,0.00019694322,0.00005834047,0.002619242,0.00007331896,0.056560185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384344,0.0008800367,0.0004065195,0.00015508363,0.00010863557,0.000039509698,0.00033126623,0.000023208353,0.004212333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807944,0.00695965,0.0017659122,0.0012006821,0.00635093,0.0029283927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83018833,0.08052502,0.04970621,0.0056813303,0.019462667,0.014436423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018017111,0.0002711549,0.00046908672,0.00546395,0.0011940941,0.0032065546,0.0007664513,0.0004271053,0.008144785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116672665,0.00015340142,0.00046617945,0.008783704,0.0016664783,0.0024929873,0.0020645268,0.00040099834,0.0012705674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025530855,0.00007251549,0.9149385,0.00029580572,0.00016360922,0.00030606773,0.0052785026,0.0004900668,0.0006253459,0.0067469985,0.0046050893,0.06622217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026768577,0.00019217654,0.96890277,0.000379636,0.00007350125,0.00030232978,0.006312525,0.00047769892,0.00067886355,0.003715179,0.018892594,0.00004595903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022365937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027447242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99453604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030243134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007095985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09528476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010518436","doi":"","title":"The Influences and Interactions between Various Scientific Research and Technological Domains in Case of Canadian Nanotechnology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Intellectualization; Feature (linguistics); Identification (biology); Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.33989707965871946,"score_gpt":0.4960087271973406,"score_spread":0.15611164753862117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010518436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93518245,0.0011349291,0.00057720806,0.00229404,0.000021629012,0.000050083534,0.0012915944,0.000029600196,0.059418444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947561,0.000582048,0.00030272664,0.000042098087,0.0000076036686,0.000008227165,0.00028394468,0.0000067663523,0.004010574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970379,0.00029412808,0.00015533851,0.00038417825,0.0013293582,0.0007990619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482393,0.0014025711,0.001105471,0.00016139084,0.0017542911,0.0007522405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009336135,0.00022654321,0.00029778184,0.0077914326,0.004035432,0.003873567,0.0008319094,0.00052736053,0.0056193112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009210949,0.00017965297,0.00043726605,0.01443375,0.0014128301,0.001752476,0.00191485,0.0006706828,0.00043711477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121466845,0.00006418683,0.9036591,0.00024925303,0.00014237242,0.0027563302,0.013963041,0.001947827,0.0014476859,0.03231908,0.0036361823,0.039693538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052234527,0.000018536737,0.95380616,0.000093255025,0.000106069594,0.000535831,0.02142441,0.0025122887,0.0005160944,0.0017788141,0.01915866,0.000044683355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84756786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8973853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027186617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023195585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30665964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015110812","doi":"","title":"Scientific research impact and data mining applications in hydrogeology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Office of Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Key (lock); Stability (learning theory); Information system","score_opus":0.27253057997317776,"score_gpt":0.46919192323883907,"score_spread":0.19666134326566131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015110812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39793462,0.06431044,0.37044388,0.02459926,0.0019645363,0.0021444082,0.01212948,0.0034418877,0.123031475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7607034,0.01660768,0.2129818,0.00060345395,0.0010972052,0.0009182919,0.00301229,0.00020150199,0.0038744283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865841,0.0055665527,0.0015586567,0.0010761599,0.004916571,0.0002979021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86986405,0.103448026,0.010296244,0.0050538685,0.010206874,0.0011308297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016728664,0.0013266096,0.0015925962,0.04254678,0.0015587965,0.009921091,0.001469461,0.0015361528,0.0036736275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10411677,0.0006037465,0.0014702477,0.07574579,0.0021839433,0.006465131,0.0030125326,0.0019105542,0.0010915322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026430763,0.0005391474,0.20945129,0.003114228,0.00076519384,0.0005156104,0.0029063406,0.023735212,0.0018259877,0.07461406,0.00810111,0.67416745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012966256,0.0005868849,0.24838865,0.0029655977,0.0008180253,0.00195723,0.00904936,0.26221555,0.010156761,0.3555429,0.10777376,0.0004157016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002481323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021044791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98327136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026144015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019891348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0884707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015177041","doi":"","title":"Science Research Output pattern of University of Delhi (2015-2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New delhi; Web of science; Citation; Citation impact; Scientometrics; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.5738139729034387,"score_gpt":0.5322962281283925,"score_spread":0.04151774477504622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015177041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7103641,0.0167723,0.0007556545,0.0033063455,0.00031073796,0.00008580842,0.21207918,0.0009028131,0.05542313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8973326,0.009937828,0.0009772482,0.00019784427,0.00016385342,0.000077536584,0.08083081,0.00013169243,0.010350552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975255,0.00017346125,0.0005941926,0.00039063336,0.0009592339,0.00035686046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152726,0.0017191594,0.0023519793,0.00044732328,0.003094872,0.00085944193],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013256251,0.00042557108,0.000556569,0.018015888,0.00037945344,0.00343764,0.00082983746,0.0004073647,0.0049955486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007653432,0.00016718757,0.00077704014,0.04781352,0.00033542063,0.0015367651,0.0013312737,0.0004166172,0.0025044268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053023384,0.000107126834,0.770505,0.006041248,0.0006447514,0.0015875312,0.0028990994,0.0019510512,0.0051014908,0.007123369,0.05562092,0.14788814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010400229,0.00007597677,0.90431756,0.0002775751,0.00012533537,0.001162362,0.0026313297,0.00037980598,0.0018706708,0.00038330356,0.08872049,0.000045098535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015236769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015423763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98198414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022153945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022433684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030296147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015680823","doi":"","title":"US Hotel Industry Performance Outpacing Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic recovery; Hotel industry; Overtime; Restructuring; Stimulus (psychology); Hospitality industry; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.4077800970804639,"score_gpt":0.5271352526983022,"score_spread":0.11935515561783827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015680823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3844587,0.005573018,0.001011375,0.25962505,0.006281615,0.00006431928,0.01029319,0.0015526105,0.33114016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90137637,0.0030466146,0.0006243799,0.014196821,0.0013473711,0.000044158147,0.008540409,0.00023476752,0.07058902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759066,0.0003624275,0.00014268933,0.00012951175,0.0010258291,0.0007488453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905599,0.0004949638,0.0005409603,0.0002672479,0.0045962026,0.0035407771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039391345,0.0004322619,0.0003105513,0.0014788525,0.0017862219,0.008034609,0.0003907817,0.0010545483,0.01862279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005907198,0.00011537941,0.00040206322,0.0022779342,0.0006169351,0.0022573886,0.0019984886,0.0015177593,0.010603574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029764662,0.00025845462,0.0734287,0.00016294143,0.000034347227,0.00016322602,0.00089793425,0.00056788814,0.0010043256,0.012050195,0.79552007,0.115614176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042999625,0.0008051047,0.426525,0.00032469863,0.00002328708,0.00022431229,0.013162199,0.0019795198,0.0020336278,0.0036116373,0.55113775,0.00012983437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031014204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044698697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031014204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039291596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044447384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06229943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017159071","doi":"","title":"Advancing Waterfowl Ecology and Management: Assessments of an Online Course, Professional Credentials, and Graduate Student Publication Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TigerPrints (Clemson University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Outreach; Wildlife; Coursework; Nexus (standard); Graduate students; Publishing","score_opus":0.3545544243174834,"score_gpt":0.5155421950172021,"score_spread":0.1609877706997187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017159071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969791,0.00009284122,0.00009104663,0.00015681957,0.000013808107,0.000039346738,0.0000698569,0.000016613112,0.0025405572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969259,0.00016525314,0.00045589925,0.000060261886,0.00002975579,0.00004559203,0.00017196755,0.0000056916583,0.0021397227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973471,0.0006023595,0.00035317434,0.00023496748,0.0011242495,0.00033805918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95413166,0.010191889,0.011272095,0.0014997151,0.012001847,0.010902791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008323371,0.00031363082,0.00030713927,0.0026326668,0.0010551533,0.0026568158,0.000676272,0.0007394651,0.004486318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028614352,0.00017792555,0.00039341295,0.0013956458,0.00054199377,0.0021753989,0.002044308,0.0008297149,0.0011494446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003554301,0.003687868,0.85472864,0.00020722052,0.00007039554,0.0002592582,0.009973624,0.0002614384,0.0023984464,0.00017810267,0.0024675434,0.12541206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019600968,0.0013461128,0.9852309,0.00006063339,0.000017598233,0.00015664416,0.008549884,0.0007389146,0.00084061193,0.00010069052,0.0029140245,0.000024367619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016276645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033674126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008602898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012227847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044018745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019169978","doi":"","title":"The evaluation of the biorefinery research: A scientometric approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DSpace (Sirnak University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biorefinery; Incentive; Scopus; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.8900642233575887,"score_gpt":0.613219212823936,"score_spread":0.27684501053365274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019169978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5785808,0.041725982,0.11893062,0.013851741,0.0012633526,0.0053704823,0.015752515,0.00085664424,0.22366792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94702125,0.009118533,0.035677373,0.00024069277,0.0007485622,0.00120746,0.0033773005,0.00007770372,0.002531076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.923331,0.027760912,0.008635395,0.0028780547,0.03606581,0.0013287629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88203824,0.07996992,0.01350715,0.0043679005,0.018164022,0.0019527194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050687212,0.0012487326,0.0027528205,0.16297825,0.0023886496,0.014462117,0.001564604,0.00156614,0.0040618675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14954588,0.00035687519,0.0021174448,0.21078658,0.0031313805,0.0084580025,0.004149998,0.00086503837,0.0011020147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028657768,0.0004508994,0.27064663,0.00820011,0.0023388474,0.0008016777,0.007454102,0.009776316,0.0016039633,0.06665016,0.012311686,0.6194789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013099273,0.0012756954,0.5677244,0.005529636,0.0023732223,0.0016398549,0.040668998,0.0805609,0.004831242,0.1543023,0.14043328,0.0005294738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032742291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028711406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9493128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00607955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078351665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26806277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024651468","doi":"","title":"Rutherford's scientific impact from a bibliometric perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Work (physics); Scientific literature","score_opus":0.668275655626309,"score_gpt":0.5722568035591731,"score_spread":0.0960188520671359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024651468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08408162,0.13419896,0.008390283,0.031897906,0.0022547643,0.00020024963,0.030265884,0.000965032,0.7077453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89524955,0.06321144,0.007169508,0.0016120046,0.0050059184,0.00025604272,0.0096416,0.00020909078,0.017644923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983214,0.003033138,0.0010332081,0.00091259717,0.011056057,0.00075106224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96414995,0.021572847,0.0056565935,0.0017357948,0.0059585697,0.0009262226],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075641326,0.00074214634,0.0015124882,0.14514624,0.002226922,0.011466418,0.0010883954,0.0011388133,0.014472997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049582146,0.00029293264,0.0008870993,0.2519262,0.0035644849,0.0076408866,0.0031602655,0.0010272327,0.0024809558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011222177,0.00010115117,0.07935727,0.003133168,0.000764783,0.0005463036,0.0047798553,0.0023166314,0.00066946395,0.2759864,0.21512926,0.4171035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037745027,0.00010614473,0.22867128,0.0021362295,0.0004896645,0.0018132419,0.005442982,0.004051106,0.0011916296,0.13081928,0.6250369,0.0002038629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014946666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015356103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85485375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006191388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048416972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027134608","doi":"","title":"Collaboration trend in Indian Business-Management research: A bibliometric perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; Ranking (information retrieval); Productivity; Bibliometrics; Perspective (graphical); Private sector; Higher education","score_opus":0.4906960885201618,"score_gpt":0.5384972021556624,"score_spread":0.04780111363550066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027134608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90118474,0.02551853,0.0028086007,0.0036493645,0.00016074438,0.000106935266,0.012957203,0.00027018462,0.0533437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833914,0.0079781,0.0023435885,0.00010228733,0.00018806092,0.00006444785,0.0046255044,0.00002779714,0.0012788947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924429,0.0016490814,0.001499049,0.00066371047,0.0031936497,0.00055159035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602043,0.01754075,0.012212074,0.0018842709,0.0068012867,0.0013572808],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040196385,0.0002493081,0.0006722446,0.06284318,0.001298214,0.006740037,0.0007799843,0.0005648055,0.0020778882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023528699,0.00015547882,0.0007383293,0.1552439,0.00093238766,0.0030281835,0.0023463448,0.00054547156,0.0006103555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000987512,0.000082240804,0.85511136,0.0025321036,0.00026701504,0.00075043144,0.008917566,0.0015354205,0.0012064343,0.010415117,0.0043103574,0.1147733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041119374,0.00007955923,0.94481105,0.00047892606,0.00016154956,0.0015284129,0.012870719,0.002012536,0.00077306246,0.0023030615,0.034917515,0.000059413924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007504654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00944896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002109222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031421937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021258116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028459977","doi":"","title":"Exploring Dissociation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Impact on Emotion, Cognition, and Daily Functioning Among Military Members, Veterans, and First Responders in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research; Mitacs; McMaster University","keywords":"Derealization; Depersonalization; Dissociation (chemistry); Dissociative; Hypervigilance; Cognition; Dissociative disorders; Poison control; Posttraumatic stress; Injury prevention","score_opus":0.142951924722821,"score_gpt":0.35208437980249324,"score_spread":0.20913245507967224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028459977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975005,0.0004948599,0.00006622617,0.0003400029,0.000008009237,0.000020538813,0.00049661787,0.0000032912503,0.0010700913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690896,0.0009763629,0.00023617891,0.00010296404,0.000005257076,0.000017893697,0.0006947708,0.0000034098584,0.001054205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995981,0.000031685326,0.000017932984,0.00004471092,0.00016532121,0.00014237654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992428,0.00008524198,0.00012803613,0.000020031714,0.00026903523,0.00025481218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065558794,0.00034925842,0.00036773345,0.00070785783,0.0027789343,0.0014082388,0.0008329465,0.0003297152,0.0014553796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019084185,0.0002507943,0.0006282323,0.0013253095,0.0009105344,0.0003282943,0.0013154147,0.0010649668,0.0001296448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009627143,0.000108155036,0.9802495,0.000044183216,0.00007788599,0.00008484467,0.0042731357,0.00039938008,0.00029962262,0.0002077453,0.0011360582,0.013023159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040305085,0.000033876855,0.9941042,0.000032361575,0.00002315035,0.00003462744,0.0044729095,0.00046741142,0.00009180886,0.00004837918,0.0006773126,0.000009963586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025963604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017612737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01857256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12778997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029452250","doi":"","title":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS) Through Bibliometric Lenses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Information science; Work (physics); Bibliometrics; Documentation science; Style (visual arts); Association (psychology); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.28238344183632763,"score_gpt":0.4610325238676943,"score_spread":0.17864908203136665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029452250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38501072,0.056378692,0.029297551,0.056497306,0.0030036517,0.0012062505,0.013596298,0.00085413334,0.4541554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95732564,0.0140060885,0.015486038,0.0015046918,0.0019511651,0.00060618785,0.0023967056,0.00012933603,0.006594153],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741566,0.008994966,0.0035543917,0.0012381554,0.011390005,0.00066583446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8842414,0.07411268,0.018375464,0.005225145,0.015760412,0.0022848963],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020899953,0.0005244956,0.00094349205,0.07270105,0.0026224658,0.025096858,0.0009497934,0.0010268575,0.008922235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10038386,0.00029360256,0.00056500174,0.09491471,0.003653717,0.015007297,0.006359291,0.0013028528,0.001079044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017048452,0.00023808208,0.2061104,0.008268016,0.0004636031,0.0004983392,0.03268432,0.0010512691,0.0010757847,0.29201987,0.051886458,0.40553337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046856192,0.00017117117,0.3477718,0.009314442,0.0004870023,0.000919661,0.09729678,0.0037390378,0.0019268212,0.13693053,0.4012451,0.00015081145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036766988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005790373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92729896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006704305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013073738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11053085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029718286","doi":"","title":"Leveraging Machine Learning to Investigate the Impact of NSERC Funding Programs on Research Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Random forest; Productivity; Excellence; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Impact assessment","score_opus":0.5238785425913034,"score_gpt":0.5380309938480166,"score_spread":0.014152451256713161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029718286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8853391,0.0055701365,0.066823326,0.0174405,0.000589726,0.0005940413,0.0042484333,0.0010344478,0.018360278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976858,0.0007675299,0.018491972,0.0008135891,0.0002202416,0.00030770354,0.0013273095,0.000056459576,0.0011571123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95405567,0.030404994,0.002284004,0.00270192,0.008770383,0.0017831032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6462383,0.27141967,0.044696398,0.017166097,0.015967855,0.004511629],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069608144,0.0006972386,0.0009907344,0.0059939516,0.0007423674,0.0034648953,0.0012391402,0.0009517092,0.0020381303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22936594,0.00023205385,0.001449796,0.008264772,0.0010513158,0.002705524,0.0022924077,0.0018899819,0.0007757761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073580886,0.0011981283,0.6865745,0.00054623105,0.0020551132,0.000174041,0.0004266407,0.037689038,0.0007054923,0.0056020464,0.005503373,0.25878954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024074163,0.0022656654,0.6094007,0.00069027103,0.0015181134,0.00017952938,0.0008846105,0.33429375,0.00423753,0.03277591,0.013299027,0.00021419564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012338017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016570123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002399108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007131331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36812747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029755314","doi":"","title":"LIS Research Productivity According to Gender","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Proposition; Information science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Gender gap; Gender analysis","score_opus":0.8647703747500841,"score_gpt":0.6188742572802068,"score_spread":0.24589611746987727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029755314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97306764,0.003958767,0.00093373813,0.001960543,0.00012552047,0.00003588633,0.0023465906,0.00006637852,0.017504914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905799,0.0013989276,0.00048935803,0.00012519976,0.00012471843,0.000031278185,0.0004837189,0.000025283603,0.006741626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551827,0.0010522677,0.0006854988,0.00065317156,0.0016053399,0.0004855107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459547,0.022789406,0.01619032,0.00266987,0.00886563,0.0035301147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052881846,0.00022382404,0.000409202,0.0061362395,0.0007949398,0.0029334298,0.00051791925,0.0003015639,0.010411998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025737498,0.0001414514,0.00038574188,0.006738246,0.00077544973,0.0022897578,0.0012538872,0.0002853571,0.0029181421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032413585,0.000059358128,0.8936541,0.00037394956,0.00005154365,0.0006283046,0.009626836,0.00020336958,0.001154772,0.0013002228,0.0028980451,0.089725286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001273136,0.00024750235,0.95042783,0.0002879773,0.000052027113,0.0020176366,0.019437777,0.0005074618,0.0016504558,0.0018869659,0.023434551,0.00003698462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001289666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015894097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010293876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011561932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034831643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030007273","doi":"","title":"Les représentations de nouveaux arrivants allophones envers leur apprentissage d'une langue seconde et leurs liens avec le progrès en compréhension orale du français dans les cours de francisation","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Derogation","score_opus":0.08828638221235763,"score_gpt":0.344886350139473,"score_spread":0.25659996792711537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030007273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908511,0.000168661,0.0018255118,0.00017636339,0.000019797108,0.000035966,0.00016348572,0.000047525406,0.0067115147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98903066,0.0003040861,0.0020904564,0.000087627086,0.0000115066205,0.00006753381,0.00030768287,0.000050535982,0.008049822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979201,0.00076914416,0.00009160039,0.00030424754,0.00063653535,0.00027833533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656476,0.0072892215,0.001496976,0.000680825,0.00324831,0.00071987876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024019822,0.00076794595,0.0003921453,0.0008826442,0.0011508162,0.0037028803,0.00054127286,0.0009903272,0.00980214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019209716,0.00040855494,0.00044518043,0.0007254937,0.0013631495,0.0017018733,0.0015497953,0.0012119227,0.0011267075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017483155,0.0002989642,0.4046931,0.0010890783,0.0003579075,0.0012001424,0.31932765,0.0013955134,0.08371669,0.0035356965,0.003007885,0.17962916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033224685,0.00047015792,0.85752314,0.0003524253,0.0003044921,0.00048794737,0.11757897,0.0032526678,0.007222704,0.0009527752,0.011628534,0.00019287497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1364425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17864648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001964695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022540241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27129662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030314469","doi":"","title":"Mixed-race Migration and Adoption in Gish Jen’s <i>The Love Wife</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.2880149556935347,"score_gpt":0.39876672882871383,"score_spread":0.11075177313517914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030314469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97869027,0.0030397966,0.00009448853,0.00953835,0.000212986,0.000009437014,0.0001340533,0.0000026125842,0.008277872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938943,0.0019117101,0.000096356685,0.0010313522,0.000054437638,0.000009304215,0.00006979586,0.0000077383775,0.0029250446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899346,0.00034465708,0.000053544616,0.00011963935,0.00017079817,0.00031787052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972345,0.0007598528,0.0006752817,0.00013885279,0.0004983828,0.00069326564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019573718,0.00009390793,0.00021299983,0.0009394166,0.0030134004,0.001674059,0.0005444509,0.0005471303,0.0062874975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079644285,0.00015500262,0.00021918736,0.0021615494,0.0014289117,0.0016329521,0.0016447839,0.0011414123,0.00042167355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023674787,0.00025560675,0.7347081,0.00018898315,0.00010389836,0.0018433689,0.11793625,0.000063395855,0.00040363893,0.016812589,0.017467136,0.10998028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116230685,0.00007456652,0.69900095,0.00048398777,0.00006439141,0.0009177885,0.25192294,0.0001429893,0.0002658428,0.0016809667,0.04539685,0.000037053866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12645045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2610479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12645045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002019211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036185363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25142884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033055170","doi":"","title":"Paleomagnetic Determination of Vertical Axis Block Rotation near the Doty Fault in southwestern Washington","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western CEDAR (Western Washington University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clockwise; Paleomagnetism; Sinistral and dextral; Rotation (mathematics); Fault (geology); Forearc; Fault block; Shear (geology)","score_opus":0.19443540374839166,"score_gpt":0.4109280813885183,"score_spread":0.2164926776401266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033055170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.000029083634,0.00008290586,0.0000033429164,0.0000011359587,0.0000021061185,0.00010239909,0.0000024016615,0.00064352393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928206,0.00003412795,0.0001507359,0.0000020490618,0.0000010127218,0.0000026012458,0.00022301065,0.0000015928705,0.00030280865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999368,0.000006585002,0.0000047656063,0.000023289998,0.000012753374,0.000015766738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987197,0.000012968252,0.000043766227,0.000010905128,0.00004283245,0.000017567929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102756145,0.00013334255,0.00011410117,0.0010285665,0.0003342238,0.000431068,0.000111577945,0.00010164136,0.0006769516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031816846,0.00010631557,0.000072016395,0.0006914282,0.00028478255,0.00012864571,0.00023795155,0.00013208165,0.00011833236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006885365,0.000008887729,0.98023695,0.000009465053,0.000015188568,0.000091139926,0.0005563194,0.00021636496,0.010961383,0.00007284174,0.00006846471,0.007694121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011490682,0.000008725264,0.9987956,0.000002570049,0.0000033214433,0.000032417298,0.00022994926,0.00011391382,0.00054751115,0.0000088163015,0.00025479487,0.0000011879191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06708188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24799927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06708188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053267035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002887746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034790765","doi":"","title":"ZENPod Season 5,Episode 8 with HK Venkatram","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Violin; Musical; Conversation; Brother; Popular music; Girl; Style (visual arts)","score_opus":0.07311664026062643,"score_gpt":0.343095489259554,"score_spread":0.2699788489989276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034790765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00546015,0.000923509,0.00047951104,0.0033039802,0.0042495755,0.00013367721,0.0031841758,0.0006831546,0.9815823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012825824,0.00024208332,0.00016990816,0.00074768433,0.00013873386,0.000036447265,0.0013734823,0.00054886815,0.98391694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996019,0.00004257989,0.000011130543,0.00006727989,0.00011247509,0.0001646302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.000029236948,0.000014890039,0.0000412311,0.00008447705,0.00028153992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003317508,0.00042921296,0.00031054832,0.00044072242,0.005559663,0.005049435,0.0008247866,0.0012397706,0.4468085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097756,0.00033825843,0.00024712257,0.00078597595,0.00076941535,0.0024893414,0.003673071,0.002265334,0.18667446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007620983,0.00002687386,0.0005172793,0.00010223739,0.0000025703578,0.00022691552,0.0023713384,0.000024905365,0.0004790329,0.0063564973,0.9700455,0.019770755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025137908,0.0000047491517,0.0007383022,0.000032245393,5.610464e-7,0.000045026612,0.002068706,0.000009401994,0.00010270782,0.00011574409,0.996876,0.0000040015984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025364349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1281844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019552854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020875987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78906053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034947224","doi":"","title":"??++++™`¦¦? 1800-750-6584 ™œœ¦¦ Norton phone number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Telephone number; Service (business); Phone call; Helpline; Telephone line","score_opus":0.18944977047496306,"score_gpt":0.47298264068731977,"score_spread":0.28353287021235674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034947224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061183603,0.00033987928,0.0006334043,0.0003838336,0.0005095661,0.00006937449,0.00097106246,0.0013648251,0.9951161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007963339,0.00022044804,0.0002140649,0.00006840425,0.000032991935,0.000010747279,0.00039072384,0.00018618973,0.99808013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972516,0.000017094211,0.000010512794,0.00006287922,0.00014843744,0.000035837034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922884,0.0000603266,0.000028381979,0.00006021314,0.00035752918,0.00026475772],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002348197,0.0007752008,0.0005739981,0.00084609236,0.0011806992,0.0036383888,0.00066391274,0.00094587356,0.9014166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008502667,0.00045640182,0.00036448354,0.00090201636,0.00033780967,0.0016841423,0.0011364352,0.00086349185,0.8961969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006565922,0.000064625296,0.00036840918,0.000121764395,0.000002617065,0.00011695134,0.000063529646,0.00008326415,0.002528634,0.003374903,0.88840914,0.10480046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011053033,0.00003239701,0.00059039553,0.0000622205,0.0000038700714,0.00011010997,0.0000959467,0.00012058342,0.0005579309,0.00025872476,0.9981487,0.000008153253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005483293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012006699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0985834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009474173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010189047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14061725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036263172","doi":"","title":"Benzonitrile Adducts of Terminal Diarylphosphido Complexes: Preparative Sources of “Ru═PR&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Fusible alloy; Ocrelizumab; Diafiltration; Liquation; Proteogenomics","score_opus":0.3459166311947664,"score_gpt":0.4518197248748487,"score_spread":0.10590309368008233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036263172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646332,0.0008640489,0.022639824,0.0001412621,0.000051687573,0.00019397959,0.0008678101,0.00040744117,0.010200821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97739774,0.0010418318,0.011214691,0.0000651143,0.000029044146,0.00011805844,0.0013915634,0.00014664026,0.008595437],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990034,0.000009498983,0.0000056742547,0.000026340782,0.000028877592,0.000029235245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999063,0.000013801078,0.000019023035,0.00002346783,0.00001875052,0.000018650026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013390089,0.0004459458,0.00025006893,0.0001485787,0.00014057323,0.00015344383,0.00044991268,0.00023043575,0.0030505266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002159632,0.00019779455,0.00016313925,0.0001770626,0.0001370936,0.00021588766,0.00024153106,0.00075396296,0.0013084019],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078243764,0.000029279163,0.000050798226,0.000044982036,0.000006163588,0.00006418577,0.00005166865,0.0001189747,0.99744886,0.00021769956,0.00008890904,0.0018002804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012346961,0.00009008595,0.00022853616,0.0000017641858,0.00000447121,0.00005014019,0.0000055355376,0.00014414145,0.9979809,0.00002323651,0.0014560873,0.0000026668838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004961932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011622156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030505266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024109207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020277553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01020503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036482603","doi":"","title":"Canada Revenue Agency: 3 Pandemic Payments You Can Still Get in 2021 - NYSE (NYSE0001) News","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Revenue; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak","score_opus":0.3977127453922832,"score_gpt":0.511856808930045,"score_spread":0.11414406353776185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036482603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015770324,0.0023265788,0.0002448966,0.097611465,0.018912202,0.00025164604,0.015833821,0.0013609703,0.8618813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018631851,0.00079908856,0.00018868079,0.011490859,0.0007435886,0.000036068544,0.0024734396,0.00023823002,0.9821669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967391,0.00008139585,0.00005199948,0.00010746568,0.0022531487,0.00076680735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940071,0.0002827404,0.00009194096,0.00014144038,0.0031936339,0.002283122],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016383968,0.0010854516,0.00072500645,0.0018589115,0.0072225607,0.01140716,0.0014751548,0.010584956,0.3224737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065673473,0.00068225904,0.0013563747,0.001951983,0.0013450064,0.0020557705,0.002766142,0.00705982,0.14610143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005948325,0.000007536883,0.00007407566,0.000006084451,8.32473e-7,0.000018156,0.000005787465,0.000009816384,0.000012950042,0.0005926375,0.99700826,0.0022579536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013385199,0.0000047535295,0.00080789777,0.000037439895,0.0000020355164,0.000012021207,0.000070449365,0.000054086275,0.000036130594,0.0002762993,0.99867356,0.0000119724455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8391403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9535399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3224737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02066525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081142105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.966409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036710233","doi":"","title":"Call phone number@~@~+$+( 1 800 750 6584 )$$++ avg Antivirus tech Support Number norton Antivirus customer support phone number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Phone call; Service (business); Telephone number; Telephone line","score_opus":0.1287256579939664,"score_gpt":0.445537274134258,"score_spread":0.3168116161402916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036710233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005145978,0.00016469815,0.00066091144,0.0005133092,0.0006157391,0.000084292806,0.0011385282,0.0029915618,0.99331635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008489549,0.00012347593,0.00019213205,0.00015287178,0.00006653915,0.000018862218,0.0004721632,0.00040484054,0.9977202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996474,0.00002652229,0.000012173422,0.00007772433,0.00018040162,0.000055774482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984901,0.00011790651,0.000037861046,0.00013074631,0.00058067666,0.0006427272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029250092,0.0008836132,0.0006477044,0.0009832775,0.0016410258,0.0039357473,0.0008573928,0.0011601615,0.92737275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017002117,0.0004896043,0.00045585248,0.00089828845,0.0002948947,0.0020559104,0.0016309184,0.0009822869,0.928216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030270841,0.00003772265,0.00022982717,0.000053968968,0.0000015071828,0.00004988192,0.00003084599,0.00002611407,0.00084855204,0.0007685702,0.9589463,0.038976528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010124722,0.00003205685,0.00080051384,0.000043850334,0.0000049116534,0.00009086876,0.00010671532,0.0001073147,0.00042228974,0.00018197122,0.99819154,0.000007930655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037514912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075537227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07262725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069061323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010827653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103593946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036796793","doi":"","title":"The comprehensive osteoarthritis test (COAT): a simple index for measurement of treatment effects in clinical trials","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"WOMAC; Osteoarthritis; Context (archaeology); Clinical trial; Ordinal Scale; Scale (ratio); Severity of illness","score_opus":0.621138476071747,"score_gpt":0.5640080379549732,"score_spread":0.05713043811677376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036796793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6348182,0.09548958,0.09531367,0.0043960344,0.0030478113,0.082343504,0.04047782,0.0024790962,0.041634355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8496314,0.0075815585,0.07644606,0.0016726421,0.0011081953,0.05163071,0.008989754,0.00018383478,0.0027558773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9303916,0.04094072,0.007877571,0.001792872,0.018524036,0.00047309074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91416097,0.041661046,0.03188236,0.0023218193,0.00813741,0.0018364405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039822675,0.0014073156,0.004263922,0.004220553,0.00060072046,0.0013678859,0.0011976743,0.0014160736,0.0037616487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08863276,0.0005360482,0.0032858818,0.0044971434,0.0009717298,0.0015236312,0.0014415056,0.0011612279,0.0006944573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04760976,0.0030038853,0.45897534,0.019465199,0.025035786,0.00029340218,0.0005740757,0.0050625657,0.0043338155,0.0017474348,0.045055464,0.38884327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018623581,0.020967953,0.92075324,0.0014750219,0.005392597,0.0011788888,0.00017496517,0.010400041,0.0011598506,0.0015161835,0.018106349,0.00025121876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010710572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029354906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039822675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012410051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020444393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21060497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037341950","doi":"","title":"Defensiveness and threat across the continuum of relative autonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Affect (linguistics); Disposition; Set (abstract data type); Self-determination theory; Personal autonomy","score_opus":0.20217502973075016,"score_gpt":0.42795490200577946,"score_spread":0.2257798722750293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037341950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976979,0.00009604982,0.00037069723,0.000075776945,0.0000062512463,0.000012909672,0.000013576149,0.000003642552,0.0017230756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.000054185875,0.0003824417,0.000028901972,0.000005412171,0.000023271097,0.000022678949,0.0000016426131,0.00022850012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988048,0.0004011433,0.00006632851,0.00019307327,0.0004287335,0.00010589557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946951,0.001813263,0.0018693035,0.00040729743,0.00030706564,0.00090792635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011960692,0.0003262846,0.00029371426,0.00077105366,0.00052962964,0.0013415753,0.00024786187,0.00044527376,0.0024032746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006431133,0.00020099613,0.00029219795,0.00029801327,0.0014715483,0.00084428716,0.0019914592,0.0016473485,0.0001283853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023180998,0.0018247428,0.8381979,0.00026862565,0.00030869863,0.0007427731,0.023505103,0.0008099185,0.060562395,0.011710082,0.0005294057,0.0592223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031484316,0.0007524247,0.988528,0.000046028017,0.000032321255,0.0004882578,0.003053061,0.00065367523,0.0016343627,0.0039437003,0.0008082615,0.000028415132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003466741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005378846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024032746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034657988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027468844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008039832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037765056","doi":"","title":"Excessiveness of current account deficits in Turkey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Cointegration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Current account; Cash flow; Cash; Forecast period; Operating cash flow","score_opus":0.35916696490517586,"score_gpt":0.5028574763744985,"score_spread":0.14369051146932266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037765056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935229,0.0008018297,0.00007207993,0.00019215082,0.000009572413,0.0000039124257,0.00082729745,0.000009933686,0.0045602866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990158,0.00021662182,0.00002944485,0.000011604638,0.00000501317,0.0000014953284,0.00050636317,0.0000021666747,0.00021147769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964523,0.00004391583,0.00006608774,0.00007603143,0.00008949512,0.00007922729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983714,0.00016278803,0.0009882095,0.000066128916,0.0003267046,0.00008478725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005517745,0.00020300147,0.00029325287,0.002707039,0.00024261238,0.0013131547,0.00022922701,0.00025962293,0.0015703383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021594288,0.00010957554,0.00016688176,0.003142113,0.00035650624,0.0007063847,0.00063416053,0.00027218263,0.00020852231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044995875,0.00005566573,0.9479696,0.00022581115,0.00013234024,0.0013538427,0.0015191882,0.0033849715,0.0010404122,0.0055118566,0.0025186574,0.035837736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007387595,0.00002927814,0.99224347,0.00005219159,0.000033038978,0.0003731098,0.0013308253,0.0010118777,0.00024527102,0.00093995687,0.0037224458,0.000011173633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017871816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01198047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017871816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015784731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072889455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035535574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039203418","doi":"","title":"L'image de la femme à travers le contenu rédactionnel du magazine féminin québécois Elle Québec entre les années 2005 à 2009","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Le dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Verstehen; Undoing; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06565297172499163,"score_gpt":0.32227278140585514,"score_spread":0.2566198096808635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039203418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44486678,0.009554169,0.0013837658,0.089004025,0.0029589646,0.00007792176,0.0012054829,0.00023453488,0.45071435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5374828,0.002372925,0.0004430204,0.0051565384,0.00013791202,0.000031045674,0.00018937027,0.00007689486,0.4541095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992902,0.00015501666,0.000009266204,0.000076359414,0.0002684119,0.00020070405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973115,0.00032741018,0.00014787287,0.00004749381,0.0013193536,0.0008464043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093730213,0.00032256194,0.00021279359,0.0009839409,0.016715053,0.0046731248,0.00047148304,0.0010616463,0.03557097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019798486,0.00017458978,0.00015032382,0.0012047791,0.0038509944,0.001542595,0.0012021117,0.0018122352,0.001857014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001710075,0.00008970387,0.032624006,0.00026773385,0.000023935943,0.0018674382,0.46710995,0.00013134797,0.0041790935,0.048719805,0.32495597,0.11986001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038245557,0.000029709288,0.039697208,0.00019697456,0.000008894182,0.0002580928,0.15287097,0.000087238295,0.00044681106,0.00041154688,0.8059558,0.00003290752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91018516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97011673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08981484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024311231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025525259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18068749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039874808","doi":"","title":"A microflow cytometer with simultaneous dielectrophoretic actuation for the optical assay and capacitive cytometry of individual fluid suspended bioparticles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CMC Microsystems; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Fusible alloy; Articular cartilage damage","score_opus":0.12350955709199413,"score_gpt":0.37530710804400685,"score_spread":0.2517975509520127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039874808","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10974482,0.0011708521,0.84689766,0.0016669629,0.0019285704,0.0018494531,0.010883074,0.017758504,0.008100025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11238568,0.0008063074,0.863804,0.0012193779,0.00054542714,0.0055749756,0.003082309,0.0006255262,0.011956493],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965193,0.00031657174,0.00029087515,0.0012003653,0.0015218247,0.00015093325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814975,0.0007810734,0.00022777554,0.00024287058,0.00042228718,0.00017623704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393428,0.0014799266,0.0015487869,0.0033197843,0.0015149999,0.001355097,0.0021202809,0.0018408798,0.012456168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024092752,0.0006969669,0.0005402232,0.00192892,0.0009944665,0.0012116526,0.0010033599,0.0026989717,0.0031882524],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004742822,0.00056830444,0.0033462385,0.00035773087,0.000046649136,0.000115335344,0.0003618816,0.0009064243,0.90987885,0.0053529963,0.008284413,0.0703069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021265898,0.00045917433,0.007761858,0.00006191107,0.0000939424,0.0007498893,0.00010819645,0.06231578,0.88941026,0.0026931895,0.035957433,0.00017563257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051796815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013928276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012456168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001406454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016558598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041670084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042471984","doi":"","title":"Physiotherapy Graduate Program Handbooks, 2020-2021","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"MEDLINE; Rehabilitation; Program evaluation; Attendance","score_opus":0.6409493764086696,"score_gpt":0.6250321996549898,"score_spread":0.015917176753679763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042471984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018707352,0.013248836,0.0057799346,0.028083332,0.0117327655,0.00083238515,0.14931075,0.008682549,0.78045875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001902296,0.006624957,0.005715816,0.003931187,0.0010713722,0.00050933234,0.051046263,0.0009158598,0.92828286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973665,0.00029331422,0.00021246955,0.00016428898,0.0017443066,0.0002191666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905695,0.0011522963,0.0006757305,0.00030279145,0.004819482,0.0024801989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030386455,0.0011250215,0.0007258927,0.006734086,0.0010898074,0.0037502826,0.0015481287,0.002451101,0.27927455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011179965,0.00067478576,0.0005348529,0.008280411,0.00046342096,0.0023081715,0.0023940494,0.0021923168,0.2455152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001777761,0.000072209805,0.00018907941,0.00015112251,0.0000014694417,0.00000700032,0.0000101859105,0.00013123816,0.00006598787,0.00075428496,0.9247993,0.07380036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011952103,0.000018519053,0.0018423649,0.00013560572,0.0000016017439,0.000020543148,0.000026011383,0.0001120979,0.00009308818,0.0006323235,0.9970994,0.0000064609158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021511022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055017818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27927455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029132918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015336216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93426645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042655142","doi":"","title":"Pourquoi les chercheures se déplacent : social capital et les forces motrices de la mobilité académique en Italie","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flemish; Human capital; Social capital; Social mobility; Phenomenon; Academic community; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.16218680860114415,"score_gpt":0.4612764391608711,"score_spread":0.2990896305597269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042655142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7743832,0.03829983,0.003212425,0.08113118,0.00048861647,0.000037985377,0.0010945324,0.00006413961,0.10128806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024315,0.009070942,0.0006781005,0.0007683892,0.00043600332,0.00002971256,0.00014814544,0.00001716482,0.008608363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934024,0.0002700244,0.000019517047,0.00009390044,0.00013473314,0.00014149556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976457,0.0013064278,0.00046350423,0.00006761373,0.00019484169,0.00032196773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001257052,0.00034107873,0.00028061468,0.0016254322,0.0010589357,0.0037886666,0.00038282675,0.0008661353,0.01057192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044489033,0.00014194092,0.00036401476,0.0027336136,0.0019008052,0.0017861589,0.0012542073,0.0010785685,0.0011408536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004953355,0.00020407684,0.38956445,0.0009017849,0.00028731895,0.0019831003,0.04177872,0.004309871,0.0018853821,0.2299904,0.034547016,0.29405263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042279084,0.000116482304,0.81516075,0.0010366531,0.00009152458,0.0007740732,0.012335704,0.0027748903,0.00043982733,0.02040477,0.14675173,0.000071289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039787054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029752934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99874294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039365757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021883703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07911092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067087487","doi":"","title":"La mosaïque comme métaphore de l'autre dans Les aurores montréales de Monique Proulx","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07636404232255865,"score_gpt":0.3183281184565788,"score_spread":0.24196407613402016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067087487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029021772,0.07449804,0.008890614,0.32243484,0.021424353,0.00016740964,0.0023243746,0.0009219595,0.54031664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06233868,0.011706966,0.0022350918,0.0039380384,0.0022709777,0.00006358008,0.00040047386,0.00031943896,0.91672677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949458,0.0010544584,0.00014677695,0.0006486503,0.0024307224,0.0007735579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469477,0.0012574124,0.00039900182,0.00033478736,0.0023663577,0.0009477472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034666853,0.0010983025,0.00078091864,0.0035331876,0.011329809,0.013507836,0.0011349504,0.0044081854,0.042623047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009161096,0.0007234749,0.0006679972,0.005297242,0.004510227,0.004334991,0.0026843296,0.005774007,0.0071498435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003593801,0.000058613998,0.0036834753,0.0003739803,0.000027693843,0.00082465337,0.008333174,0.00055805064,0.0013812084,0.2806354,0.52516615,0.17859824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073265246,0.000007716008,0.003187693,0.000080322796,0.000003476591,0.00013200259,0.0008619396,0.00011807689,0.00043601045,0.0021542574,0.99299014,0.000020968886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5306462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66859907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4693538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024016418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022486981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9442358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7087762849","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17312776","title":"napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for Python","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Zoom; Python (programming language); Documentation; Image manipulation; Checklist; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.3765012431729193,"score_gpt":0.47974879070591564,"score_spread":0.10324754753299636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7087762849","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005723228,0.00037912058,0.14191423,0.0004061904,0.00045452794,0.00019130802,0.06373381,0.7686512,0.023697307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011403085,0.0006603641,0.14643762,0.0013586158,0.0002051968,0.0011437213,0.15737252,0.63219273,0.049226105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902165,0.00012773281,0.000098381825,0.00019101173,0.0004136365,0.0001475823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841046,0.000335433,0.00010473073,0.00039063257,0.0005695543,0.00018917158],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015976089,0.0021908537,0.0012347432,0.0017003362,0.0008874066,0.0033372275,0.0051832744,0.0014587722,0.29962924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045963675,0.002467369,0.0021971758,0.0011325787,0.0006103311,0.005397354,0.004442998,0.0048826477,0.27635974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009570583,0.000017301212,0.00017714582,0.000362686,0.00003233177,0.000054914075,0.00011066099,0.00036282453,0.002062219,0.0023916252,0.97047746,0.023855116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012368524,0.000026906897,0.0012021947,0.00019455116,0.000027639127,0.00035280842,0.00007001744,0.006545255,0.008515692,0.009384475,0.97338563,0.00017123914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039699255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053410493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29962924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081287534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017748559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093096134","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17410105","title":"Laying the groundwork: Preparing researchers for the revisedTri-Agency open access policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Laying; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.6943885888534266,"score_gpt":0.5907646996692758,"score_spread":0.10362388918415077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093096134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005655998,0.0015786765,0.03344322,0.9106126,0.015730979,0.0016009372,0.0004906872,0.0007035423,0.030183328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18254748,0.003822111,0.3033814,0.39396158,0.012897974,0.009709122,0.0020573125,0.0025392224,0.08908376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.54836947,0.25364372,0.043699626,0.02267164,0.09780071,0.033814885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1786149,0.42638084,0.027558297,0.10925013,0.20089878,0.057297144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4885676,0.0012049559,0.0028381245,0.0076175933,0.01885385,0.06958819,0.014329115,0.065481536,0.021778287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69168574,0.0035419515,0.004046492,0.007761113,0.025494453,0.051192146,0.03247419,0.05849729,0.012138481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003372353,0.00030916274,0.0032812443,0.0009982765,0.00011121805,0.0010558205,0.018959109,0.0009890364,0.0020770908,0.4966614,0.39916787,0.07605256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001809718,0.00015788329,0.0021691623,0.0021480422,0.000107559186,0.00026997292,0.014787992,0.0015820417,0.0016646388,0.14207289,0.8345677,0.0002911655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019500548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022443004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98567086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026243707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23238856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63068724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093298898","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17427187","title":"Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Presentation (obstetrics); Perspective (graphical); Citation; Data access; Data presentation; Scholarly communication","score_opus":0.5017717238498743,"score_gpt":0.5496287742648531,"score_spread":0.047857050414978786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093298898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014127234,0.005686162,0.019017417,0.5879933,0.0012138683,0.00005785361,0.00036318818,0.00007391958,0.371467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8901008,0.010025362,0.0075208107,0.028941292,0.002179859,0.0003368476,0.00022170105,0.00026276935,0.060410507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674845,0.022177445,0.00063510705,0.0024258129,0.0046454505,0.0026316175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331927,0.053540364,0.0020476426,0.0033249976,0.0047357385,0.003158535],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040286034,0.0007708921,0.0011554456,0.0054050726,0.018709464,0.042966925,0.002828032,0.006664384,0.0103675695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036855508,0.0008609084,0.00053010567,0.007434032,0.11938661,0.043689556,0.019250492,0.008310555,0.0018460425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079642905,0.00000510903,0.00013013193,0.000025687723,0.0000019214121,0.00005736078,0.014175041,0.000042791136,0.000036826754,0.97767454,0.0043704817,0.0034721862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010504981,0.0000131852485,0.00019117934,0.0002965254,0.000007822318,0.00012105033,0.04016987,0.00021957327,0.00020751708,0.6196566,0.33907863,0.000027586604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019153966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014896137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99717194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022849834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016720971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21305543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095057608","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2036425.1546","title":"Bibliometric analysis of Iranian Authors in High-Impact Medical Science Journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Specialty; Citation impact; MEDLINE; Middle East","score_opus":0.7670192304732296,"score_gpt":0.7585526557240697,"score_spread":0.008466574749159905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095057608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87485224,0.049054574,0.006041329,0.0026015728,0.00047248503,0.000828338,0.03211678,0.00054681953,0.03348595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695091,0.012536296,0.004439019,0.000163123,0.000580461,0.0004782861,0.010822231,0.00006369392,0.0014077855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834381,0.002425203,0.0047362777,0.0013216148,0.00729403,0.0007848266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371223,0.020496327,0.022349184,0.0023148484,0.01640957,0.0013076625],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080019375,0.00086021883,0.0018245704,0.105597034,0.0015311606,0.0048547788,0.0011283449,0.0006101327,0.00334179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064698346,0.00028877627,0.001627497,0.12957737,0.0008150891,0.0030380604,0.0019764549,0.0004170887,0.0013199961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022566445,0.00009314067,0.85280585,0.0044118976,0.0012104162,0.0003991015,0.0021097113,0.00065512996,0.0007295007,0.001429988,0.0076531386,0.12827638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036257694,0.00012890955,0.9579143,0.0010410243,0.0011012413,0.0017889357,0.004636309,0.0017688986,0.0010620009,0.0020500189,0.028394243,0.00007780511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042311414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043281512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023269232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037220465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04231882},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7095063509","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2037025.1552","title":"Citation analysis of Muslim scholars of the Islamic Golden Age on the Web of Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Citation analysis; Islamic studies; Subject (documents); Citation; Sharia","score_opus":0.7356534755010881,"score_gpt":0.7075116164701988,"score_spread":0.028141859030889282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095063509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8561887,0.06948466,0.003164,0.0029905885,0.0008149339,0.00023142369,0.0071326937,0.00012055185,0.059872475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503062,0.03443756,0.0046515446,0.00024931435,0.0005632606,0.00017779128,0.0048780483,0.0000513552,0.0046850387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951192,0.00072689017,0.0008328383,0.00020251755,0.002935516,0.0001829749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693998,0.01518658,0.004477116,0.0010462629,0.00932163,0.00056867505],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004656721,0.0002785627,0.0007551774,0.06410507,0.0012863795,0.0040670135,0.00045198723,0.00057026214,0.003202783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033233505,0.00009930999,0.00056911865,0.1010851,0.00063414813,0.002727936,0.0014824698,0.00036089408,0.0006884384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029123173,0.00016482895,0.32702872,0.008173878,0.00051875005,0.0016009301,0.025808543,0.0007971257,0.003368533,0.023239398,0.016929025,0.5920791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021915466,0.00016589923,0.7872497,0.0058409204,0.0008637582,0.0022201592,0.03439601,0.0036454594,0.003668425,0.010248887,0.15156077,0.00011810996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032856055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00467517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9358949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015841041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021234774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024627388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095226389","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Private sector; Quarter (Canadian coin); German","score_opus":0.6626260073294132,"score_gpt":0.5997115490804761,"score_spread":0.06291445824893716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095226389","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015082617,0.004241533,0.0031263712,0.0066042156,0.01232864,0.00066576665,0.50364465,0.0029715456,0.46490908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022854544,0.013594349,0.010047652,0.0030253155,0.0036995285,0.0009343802,0.60565203,0.0031881453,0.33700404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988432,0.0001253597,0.00010220746,0.0002359163,0.00055165164,0.00014164465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995948,0.00056200475,0.00032755837,0.00043522852,0.0024840636,0.00024312815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092984823,0.0013325778,0.0012925054,0.0069632516,0.0011040485,0.00887125,0.0014641344,0.0016663865,0.74081534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00985729,0.00064557814,0.0016985,0.011159699,0.00042999495,0.003851721,0.0014454887,0.0019747815,0.45001066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007961281,0.000023780472,0.0009589428,0.00088442897,0.00006154001,0.000086045686,0.000054187658,0.0010695398,0.00006906255,0.0073401956,0.9603863,0.028986488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008384366,0.000010616346,0.0026636238,0.0009341598,0.000038871443,0.000037759306,0.00021534342,0.0002438044,0.00009274444,0.004696059,0.99096304,0.00002006847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038857084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018552272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25918466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025871252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039150896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36969543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095848360","doi":"","title":"VARIATIONS IN LAKE LEVELS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.816235350570408,"score_gpt":0.6353197372167319,"score_spread":0.18091561335367612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095848360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499158,0.0013662963,0.0017286205,0.0010306035,0.00003811968,0.000024691803,0.0137958415,0.00026586474,0.03183401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993038,0.00015083891,0.00048258,0.000050430208,0.00001012428,0.000016970478,0.0018951284,0.000030038793,0.0043259272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941504,0.000090227455,0.000040270024,0.00017767493,0.00015017166,0.00012663957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989562,0.00010836856,0.0002877442,0.000069549074,0.00047845647,0.00009962046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040124802,0.00014125273,0.00028955674,0.0012388746,0.000612121,0.0012114287,0.00034055123,0.00033301197,0.005225546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00164945,0.00020983248,0.00033931536,0.0029208157,0.00040613615,0.0006768997,0.0009744258,0.00028493028,0.00094933517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045441365,0.000024598927,0.9442648,0.00022596648,0.0003661303,0.00019482426,0.0024754568,0.0016074704,0.010610444,0.0033312642,0.005411354,0.031033266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037458713,0.000016845306,0.99359435,0.000010772178,0.000019948518,0.000019033683,0.0004137868,0.00036440507,0.00040570798,0.00015430471,0.0049881497,0.000009050208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1472147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29372025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1472147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023546608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011411661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29271567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095962814","doi":"","title":"University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century†","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.4324468135178181,"score_gpt":0.5336707112954057,"score_spread":0.10122389777758756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095962814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6001832,0.28360245,0.0004921777,0.05031862,0.002462726,0.000016423997,0.005514512,0.0000763228,0.057333566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.926714,0.060807064,0.00028438933,0.0011118546,0.003633673,0.000008886179,0.0016132132,0.00003671316,0.0057901917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979,0.00046245792,0.0003624825,0.00034844797,0.0006894741,0.00023710642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95541656,0.018370464,0.0117622055,0.0010128936,0.009310485,0.00412734],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045459713,0.0002520091,0.0005487556,0.020950846,0.0012338813,0.0074943407,0.00061657856,0.0013268263,0.009834209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03725988,0.00016240204,0.00039732293,0.051317133,0.0018690821,0.006031078,0.0024440028,0.0014289927,0.0011032725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005155753,0.00033850258,0.70485616,0.0023076837,0.00052934425,0.0006558121,0.0072740847,0.00221771,0.00043737615,0.03769602,0.03758923,0.20558245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025827365,0.000110324676,0.8780389,0.00095633237,0.0003282855,0.0007888637,0.006636348,0.00095632195,0.00061158446,0.0068527865,0.10462878,0.00006576338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015023445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027210586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97904915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041550836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003854979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032898664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095969181","doi":"","title":"THE QUÉBEC-LABRADOR IRON ORE MINING REGION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Iron ore; Promotion (chess); Valorisation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5306900902771402,"score_gpt":0.5405207071261505,"score_spread":0.00983061684901032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095969181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5190361,0.01665726,0.0028525102,0.014391804,0.00037129066,0.0005266039,0.06577359,0.00048585437,0.3799049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68701136,0.00299229,0.0033245431,0.0015405596,0.000036416044,0.00012456976,0.011745101,0.00011582225,0.29310927],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994373,0.00004231842,0.000016401258,0.00009947207,0.00019625665,0.00020825687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894816,0.00008065023,0.00009253519,0.000040243533,0.00065698085,0.0001814547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537591,0.0002951321,0.00036850653,0.0015707982,0.0037649611,0.0020651398,0.0008241939,0.00064723904,0.020493977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001205631,0.00022106516,0.00023136457,0.0028550108,0.0006486934,0.0005054322,0.00086990226,0.00040306363,0.0022691404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006578255,0.00021127009,0.2846287,0.0013753397,0.00031607543,0.0030532212,0.0060989056,0.002385452,0.007474705,0.027018303,0.3033674,0.3634128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003751331,0.000039005776,0.60847867,0.00032323124,0.00003556963,0.00029911968,0.004882721,0.001230223,0.00086686155,0.00044300297,0.38332298,0.00004112941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031290736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031290736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042539924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22703129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096011743","doi":"","title":"Scatter and obsolescence of journals cited in theses and dissertations of librarianshipi","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Editorial board; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Citation","score_opus":0.6386111613696178,"score_gpt":0.5958723991812674,"score_spread":0.04273876218835038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096011743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902334,0.0031639633,0.00057228893,0.00023948669,0.000034656554,0.00001592154,0.0019791182,0.00009898385,0.0036620556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994538,0.0011947311,0.00036920316,0.0000371145,0.00014649391,0.000022428538,0.0028253389,0.000043044784,0.0008236635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914608,0.0013580271,0.0017021671,0.0012440678,0.003678696,0.00055622874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86324453,0.06562812,0.03977919,0.0068700984,0.021440879,0.0030371803],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008168896,0.0002966721,0.00077433913,0.04171604,0.0011875705,0.0046081697,0.00083317637,0.000587331,0.0027741191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07774936,0.00041717573,0.0006212412,0.035036594,0.0012819879,0.003450876,0.0029556074,0.00045554384,0.0012731756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017790434,0.000027484251,0.97449446,0.00015127863,0.00023384526,0.00010840861,0.0022613127,0.00016858318,0.00072082435,0.00048461673,0.00086160784,0.020309698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055118935,0.00004928812,0.99441975,0.000042728723,0.000048700196,0.0003942928,0.0016965156,0.00046075697,0.00036083182,0.00037974893,0.002124523,0.000017413991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025820779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003166754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95828396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011091189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076408155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043201745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096083010","doi":"","title":"The effects of aging on researchers&amp;apos; publication and citation patterns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Citation; Citation impact; Point (geometry); Sample (material); Turning point; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.8591503029328854,"score_gpt":0.6402291303600391,"score_spread":0.21892117257284627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096083010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98599666,0.0027517078,0.00029134427,0.0011337894,0.00003220131,0.000016248017,0.0037169587,0.000038390215,0.006022668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533635,0.00059498206,0.00015459249,0.0000777122,0.00003360325,0.000008554494,0.0011620779,0.000012006795,0.0026200567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975816,0.00036850496,0.00037902393,0.00040073914,0.00072399277,0.0005461212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94782245,0.014779234,0.021872258,0.0022674205,0.008791014,0.0044676284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005041672,0.0001708236,0.00048213915,0.00896291,0.00080270716,0.0019186939,0.00070954935,0.0005153632,0.005459505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026665246,0.00016474593,0.0004457295,0.010283781,0.0007267022,0.0014042893,0.00089288526,0.0004228917,0.0016411578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014626063,0.000027892587,0.97681797,0.000049948194,0.00006737648,0.000107954686,0.0012219198,0.000183489,0.00048666858,0.00053926406,0.0016328061,0.01871852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021649726,0.000016434822,0.99811965,0.000007462032,0.000012172938,0.000040788447,0.00031317747,0.00014598813,0.0000809835,0.00011349386,0.0011422432,0.0000054587767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07254507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11630027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017815628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14424556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096246290","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Work (physics); Decantation","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096246290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013584248,0.0022771256,0.005808542,0.006841401,0.005882145,0.00022817864,0.0045498167,0.0030850158,0.96996933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010058541,0.0016969353,0.003842086,0.0032260222,0.0008661495,0.00019761753,0.0037328003,0.0013627771,0.9750171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970541,0.0004930618,0.00020452599,0.00086177053,0.0010028515,0.0003836964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703693,0.00034664143,0.00015520776,0.0008058064,0.0012450861,0.00041031334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018122913,0.0011333677,0.0008698617,0.0020367128,0.0030649374,0.011064306,0.002489596,0.0043522124,0.69167763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006569619,0.0006203768,0.0009795774,0.001999689,0.0013533018,0.007051489,0.0062266216,0.0035263398,0.5839144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013208576,0.00006363446,0.00084526854,0.000444079,0.00002023002,0.00024517401,0.00073881954,0.00016469862,0.0009530107,0.06862136,0.7346634,0.19310817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062133504,0.000008944998,0.000190721,0.00007495029,0.0000029645898,0.000096898846,0.00012084952,0.000061169776,0.00018334184,0.0022142567,0.99703217,0.0000073585584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00702579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074393144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30832237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029964491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037524835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096372346","doi":"","title":"2007a), “An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Pound (networking); Quarter (Canadian coin); Reliability (semiconductor)","score_opus":0.6132578866264293,"score_gpt":0.6102705573489217,"score_spread":0.0029873292775076665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096372346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73979765,0.039184798,0.013292896,0.10780522,0.001873672,0.00081320247,0.008559728,0.00025311002,0.088419735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735581,0.006486426,0.0052621188,0.007877311,0.0010456985,0.00020268178,0.0016715189,0.000038482733,0.0038576932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.951795,0.02044116,0.005904029,0.003476995,0.01704086,0.0013419751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33462274,0.5192669,0.0820526,0.009969442,0.05019786,0.003890596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082208574,0.00061311154,0.0012246788,0.016434405,0.0029211284,0.0061412374,0.0019906056,0.0036094803,0.009752107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29032806,0.0005658892,0.0016008386,0.022999614,0.009035317,0.0070053106,0.003284383,0.0023662073,0.001985132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001252565,0.0005509754,0.7787511,0.0027929011,0.0017126076,0.00037879613,0.010995017,0.00064619764,0.00053022953,0.025124045,0.052669812,0.12459569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003588414,0.0010229915,0.89430875,0.0024072514,0.002084002,0.00072743156,0.00951658,0.0016698223,0.0033167868,0.024258848,0.06007873,0.00025005985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013347277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018029159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98356557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003940186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00479367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096388414","doi":"","title":"Articles Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Documentation; Process (computing); Performance indicator; Key (lock); Impact factor","score_opus":0.9584063099386335,"score_gpt":0.724541313555245,"score_spread":0.23386499638338853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096388414","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09226117,0.056359135,0.35104272,0.14594105,0.0032818436,0.0019936126,0.0014100341,0.0010986532,0.3466118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73099315,0.018269299,0.2403437,0.0019890214,0.0014245552,0.0011580569,0.00034531657,0.00027026774,0.005206592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.662476,0.25804302,0.016591642,0.004102232,0.055613704,0.0031733662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62282574,0.30789077,0.016338876,0.013274686,0.03637455,0.0032954577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1409207,0.0013328622,0.002207184,0.030823028,0.006667216,0.026769618,0.0024804673,0.0047223815,0.0021860402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24288678,0.00071818207,0.0012679826,0.061808936,0.014745612,0.017166989,0.0068057617,0.003264995,0.0006963932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013329239,0.0001620071,0.014518761,0.0047467845,0.00021027551,0.0014491765,0.024021434,0.0034494782,0.0006339545,0.6972613,0.015512683,0.23790082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001161041,0.00050905574,0.019869836,0.0128829675,0.00044245878,0.0025778175,0.053993892,0.024251213,0.0049862307,0.50196844,0.37802565,0.00037644358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010275733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009277786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96917695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018814037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021836072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096520032","doi":"","title":"1 An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals:","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Pound (networking); Quality (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.4815519233644152,"score_gpt":0.5593878040664252,"score_spread":0.07783588070200997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096520032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126704,0.005308886,0.0057342174,0.0058978484,0.00032929625,0.00017968535,0.0024747462,0.00021012094,0.067194745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996506,0.0004246152,0.00078372576,0.00017360467,0.00034614032,0.000038638078,0.00059156615,0.000030633055,0.0011051814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9458247,0.016271545,0.0049248002,0.004585715,0.026871739,0.0015214519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29434574,0.41308686,0.16163401,0.03382245,0.09135121,0.0057596457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044467546,0.00047660654,0.0008103317,0.019477915,0.0021867217,0.004784436,0.002259114,0.0016247674,0.0063679595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36423895,0.00037557553,0.0008222332,0.022250876,0.0059039146,0.0040789186,0.0039781528,0.0016864513,0.0023080518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030394064,0.000097747834,0.95421445,0.0004669078,0.000365192,0.000113229755,0.003206783,0.0005734652,0.0004862039,0.0035003743,0.004183571,0.03248818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003171404,0.00030757146,0.98476344,0.00020849923,0.00019168617,0.00039147408,0.00176132,0.0014542225,0.00088585337,0.0036081346,0.0063519366,0.000044133583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051151416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006195814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001984993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017419212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23516971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096571529","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); General interest; Extant taxon","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096571529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011471835,0.002913556,0.0065062167,0.010720235,0.009964456,0.00022478354,0.00465878,0.0030625407,0.96080226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009676303,0.0023473357,0.0036939655,0.0041611544,0.0013272759,0.00018392838,0.0039241705,0.0013366827,0.9733493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971956,0.0004674833,0.00018269412,0.00080654945,0.0009801426,0.0003675549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969284,0.00035822034,0.00015012479,0.0008372187,0.0013313944,0.00039471616],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225799,0.0010956138,0.00095001375,0.0018067214,0.0026763235,0.011293466,0.002642226,0.004263191,0.70358616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006668098,0.000611421,0.0010211563,0.0020543486,0.0013812471,0.008470953,0.005751724,0.003825959,0.58257145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008020448,0.000052344476,0.00048066507,0.000369608,0.000015857038,0.00013368262,0.00039583934,0.00013339214,0.00063150993,0.07056219,0.78597873,0.14116597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052380165,0.000007746944,0.00015354603,0.000072934046,0.000002646245,0.000071393886,0.000082820494,0.000066269095,0.00015651534,0.0024677457,0.9969066,0.000006654563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067373207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007075665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99819326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036169344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096803016","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Theodolite; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096803016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011298389,0.0027203574,0.0067991395,0.009162445,0.009217712,0.00024253251,0.004992914,0.0035284879,0.96220666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008822123,0.0022094767,0.0038534454,0.0035124621,0.0011175171,0.00018654893,0.0042521306,0.001394454,0.9746518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973845,0.00040894392,0.00016850045,0.00074826943,0.000946782,0.00034297726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703455,0.00033325978,0.00014092696,0.0008054542,0.0012829074,0.0004028022],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015498564,0.0011106742,0.0009578728,0.0018367899,0.0025546374,0.010799951,0.0026839068,0.0041351384,0.72710365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062347203,0.00062739494,0.0010175543,0.0020663608,0.0012652478,0.008061645,0.0056711473,0.0036148212,0.6043739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008440671,0.000056338373,0.00048210783,0.00039751997,0.000016285321,0.00013674416,0.00036332422,0.0001414365,0.0007400241,0.060169432,0.7876108,0.14980157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056548465,0.000008452424,0.00015584576,0.00007412022,0.0000027531019,0.00007353107,0.00007896862,0.000073067604,0.0001743483,0.0022749156,0.9970715,0.0000068180284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062757405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067367973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27289635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002877627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036111411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096817203","doi":"","title":"COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Work safety; Workplace safety","score_opus":0.9104718539259924,"score_gpt":0.669869234089787,"score_spread":0.24060261983620534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096817203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018599767,0.02131597,0.010339168,0.05149906,0.039164353,0.00010127685,0.0007525542,0.0005666034,0.87440103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027408062,0.008658823,0.0031333931,0.015563245,0.009235144,0.00013569546,0.0005026445,0.00062499434,0.934738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503136,0.0012159081,0.00023522139,0.0012746964,0.0017012088,0.0005416491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598,0.0009254607,0.00022705771,0.0008778656,0.0017068987,0.00028273527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315682,0.0010811934,0.0006361424,0.001787029,0.0038689552,0.011338989,0.0021722452,0.004709586,0.10093469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012091098,0.00043014195,0.0009350681,0.0018325242,0.0054359436,0.0072771455,0.0047926623,0.006201865,0.04992654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051546398,0.000025670506,0.00031073135,0.00025288638,0.000015606533,0.00014509057,0.0025302942,0.00014824615,0.00035891845,0.53954273,0.40167323,0.054945074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021160595,0.000006875315,0.00009574491,0.00008139679,0.0000028938664,0.000056915127,0.00014391709,0.00003529232,0.00012315798,0.007732481,0.991714,0.000005280479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015658488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018754339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008577619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053058066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33766013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096841259","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Bibliometrics; Perspective (graphical); Order (exchange); Web of science; Information system","score_opus":0.7104587863483294,"score_gpt":0.5599914982932118,"score_spread":0.15046728805511755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096841259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732968,0.000598263,0.003242582,0.0003225814,0.000018059067,0.000090103174,0.0041132877,0.000062543724,0.01825575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920522,0.0003860217,0.002679464,0.000011571696,0.00002029293,0.00005568921,0.0036607415,0.000039675022,0.0010942676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98391336,0.0062304153,0.0017653751,0.00087435514,0.006680169,0.0005363575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95831245,0.026367398,0.005967339,0.0019268198,0.006941273,0.00048471594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01013906,0.00033495008,0.00091624,0.020757807,0.00069525366,0.0046284087,0.00090651214,0.00062275375,0.0031922874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043864165,0.00018722618,0.00069221674,0.06011959,0.0009261126,0.00286253,0.002067251,0.000539172,0.00057024206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004354306,0.00047279763,0.7733419,0.0022878335,0.000616111,0.003721096,0.01749987,0.0162535,0.0037701926,0.015104189,0.0047351676,0.16176197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031719283,0.00025351034,0.8913559,0.0004329802,0.00033957482,0.0010569728,0.027664132,0.033024132,0.0056109657,0.0028867905,0.037226647,0.0001167686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018639557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013615968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98986095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033403372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019437557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053621113},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7097082144","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Actuary; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097082144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001073039,0.002702663,0.0059537026,0.009679793,0.009784434,0.0002235552,0.004783903,0.0033218253,0.96247715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008768482,0.002142191,0.0033781228,0.0037611395,0.0012372737,0.00017442823,0.00402782,0.0013896596,0.9751209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717724,0.00045388992,0.00017900074,0.00079176115,0.0010248809,0.00037317493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969388,0.00033717623,0.00014308828,0.00082463434,0.0013466824,0.0004096912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016395631,0.0011068006,0.00094257103,0.00183338,0.00266611,0.01119531,0.0026649537,0.004245617,0.7158886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063865744,0.00062630966,0.0010263998,0.0020326471,0.001364284,0.008055245,0.0058665005,0.0038191627,0.61054826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000817608,0.000052207826,0.00045035314,0.0003740262,0.000015282747,0.00013329499,0.00036772597,0.00012548553,0.00068043976,0.060126152,0.8000192,0.13757403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051745837,0.000007783943,0.00014612869,0.000072974966,0.0000025042182,0.00006813227,0.00007882382,0.00006386271,0.00016638217,0.0021384575,0.9972433,0.0000065428335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006590874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007026715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28411138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031293435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038309365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097158276","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Canadian Contributions to the","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Legislation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.7230730950904918,"score_gpt":0.6148379082368117,"score_spread":0.10823518685368005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097158276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7973552,0.010615221,0.0005203103,0.002623468,0.00017816262,0.00032464316,0.09144291,0.00013385671,0.096806236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465766,0.007812846,0.0010687922,0.00020948128,0.00008115529,0.0001440201,0.015999755,0.000040267074,0.028067246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933767,0.00021611057,0.00023099514,0.00039879908,0.0045220205,0.0012553665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710742,0.002273766,0.0037390322,0.00052477844,0.019262098,0.0031260632],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029930763,0.0006491907,0.0006893937,0.041521974,0.0061079073,0.0041472893,0.0013485086,0.0004910736,0.005250721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016745858,0.0002895388,0.000589504,0.08318454,0.00085840194,0.00075599103,0.0021099146,0.0005167459,0.0010547388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038308222,0.00008959668,0.75362194,0.0018589224,0.00034216713,0.0016865394,0.026229698,0.0012395907,0.0013729075,0.0088454345,0.051134344,0.15319575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000744436,0.000019344074,0.91564554,0.0001733751,0.00007068289,0.00018037153,0.0067721363,0.0003162432,0.00032716492,0.00010645443,0.076343976,0.00003724293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99017173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95847803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08576174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12941206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62224793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097313532","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Extant taxon; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097313532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011471835,0.002913556,0.0065062167,0.010720235,0.009964456,0.00022478354,0.00465878,0.0030625407,0.96080226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009676303,0.0023473357,0.0036939655,0.0041611544,0.0013272759,0.00018392838,0.0039241705,0.0013366827,0.9733493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971956,0.0004674833,0.00018269412,0.00080654945,0.0009801426,0.0003675549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969284,0.00035822034,0.00015012479,0.0008372187,0.0013313944,0.00039471616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225799,0.0010956138,0.00095001375,0.0018067214,0.0026763235,0.011293466,0.002642226,0.004263191,0.70358616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006668098,0.000611421,0.0010211563,0.0020543486,0.0013812471,0.008470953,0.005751724,0.003825959,0.58257145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008020448,0.000052344476,0.00048066507,0.000369608,0.000015857038,0.00013368262,0.00039583934,0.00013339214,0.00063150993,0.07056219,0.78597873,0.14116597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052380165,0.000007746944,0.00015354603,0.000072934046,0.000002646245,0.000071393886,0.000082820494,0.000066269095,0.00015651534,0.0024677457,0.9969066,0.000006654563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067373207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007075665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29641384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036169344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097367846","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.7595070969323877,"score_gpt":0.6205012030570045,"score_spread":0.1390058938753832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097367846","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015430832,0.0038436085,0.0031534757,0.0057420987,0.011931902,0.000701896,0.53675365,0.0029172157,0.4334131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02272623,0.01303472,0.0100388,0.0025825268,0.003185937,0.000940592,0.639302,0.0029888405,0.30520034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988354,0.000118194555,0.00010368587,0.00022917593,0.00056746695,0.00014603949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960186,0.0005306627,0.00031503182,0.00040450427,0.0025119702,0.00021930186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088608725,0.0013611879,0.0012552345,0.0070770155,0.0010782599,0.008664879,0.0015356372,0.0016915705,0.7221647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009303167,0.00066032604,0.001837471,0.011000422,0.000401354,0.0036823852,0.0014007763,0.0019412902,0.4185814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008344246,0.0000282944,0.0010522631,0.00095489784,0.000071603914,0.00008737875,0.000053227348,0.0013597792,0.00007685525,0.007334542,0.9590752,0.029822402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009493049,0.000011469791,0.0029023516,0.0009711629,0.000045514753,0.000036057398,0.00021861588,0.00029354813,0.00011618754,0.004806542,0.9904819,0.000021734477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04486296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021282086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2778353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026696816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039860792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39629835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097396566","doi":"","title":"THE SPATIAL LINKAGES OF MANUFACTURING IN MONTREAL AND ITS SURROUNDINGS l","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Valorisation","score_opus":0.3238786962315818,"score_gpt":0.5008103550717398,"score_spread":0.176931658840158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097396566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91393656,0.0041515515,0.0005196501,0.0035234918,0.000045084285,0.00007511614,0.007253928,0.0000668992,0.07042768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880404,0.0008027866,0.0003831353,0.000070872185,0.000011056257,0.00001873388,0.00090452837,0.000009145178,0.009759473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994554,0.00006927237,0.0000166724,0.00010215177,0.00012316897,0.00023333475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992348,0.000100802004,0.00018059011,0.00003641279,0.00027492596,0.00017248455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029405384,0.00022503345,0.00020996876,0.0034600873,0.0028055683,0.0035157055,0.0009107144,0.00032037005,0.0109524615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014967055,0.00024548647,0.00029174756,0.009370565,0.0017943496,0.00081269606,0.0020146267,0.0003472354,0.0004680074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003403668,0.00014033531,0.74019265,0.00042843306,0.00032828777,0.0022096657,0.014483817,0.008920332,0.003019775,0.08559473,0.028638363,0.11570318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001042343,0.000020996711,0.94726163,0.00009380675,0.00003843233,0.00008963813,0.008518932,0.0010629428,0.00021221425,0.0006526456,0.041993715,0.0000445751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98641646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038918678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038918678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021130266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28237605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097434678","doi":"","title":"MINERALOGICAL VARIATIONS WITHIN TWO WIDESPREAD HOLOCENE TEPHRA LAYERS FROM CASCADE RANGE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tephra; Range (aeronautics); Cascade; Holocene","score_opus":0.4727296091812778,"score_gpt":0.5341384190932411,"score_spread":0.06140880991196329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097434678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99722266,0.00017810061,0.00007971193,0.000013999629,0.000002651837,0.000010220588,0.00023402981,0.000008283359,0.0022503852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.0000974793,0.00014736044,0.000012049692,0.0000037929453,0.000007766529,0.00027312324,0.000006978144,0.00079046533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997347,0.00001548005,0.000016977721,0.000104858744,0.00006255773,0.00006546216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997172,0.0000428637,0.00006677064,0.000014907584,0.00011014824,0.000048182337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018065891,0.0002281492,0.00035486306,0.0023523308,0.0012971226,0.0011896403,0.0004968186,0.0004911719,0.0018443809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006251449,0.000300639,0.00017387341,0.0016655617,0.00079064805,0.00038896425,0.0007956431,0.0002890856,0.0006125636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088403525,0.000099468954,0.787109,0.00016626235,0.0001406206,0.002020874,0.016043425,0.00046833925,0.16418986,0.0005629885,0.0004303434,0.027884824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005519109,0.00003089175,0.99691296,0.000011125921,0.000012659537,0.00020349513,0.0010449814,0.00007647416,0.0006575641,0.000024891939,0.0010150145,0.000004407979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11197208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25762948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11197208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001229913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006211924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2226407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097742281","doi":"","title":"ACTION RESEARCH BUILT ON UNCERTAIN FOUNDATIONS: THE INTERNSHIP AND ACTION-","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Action research; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.9619219493185587,"score_gpt":0.7435631722513365,"score_spread":0.21835877706722218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097742281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032633718,0.01829226,0.08946548,0.36432862,0.004954219,0.00039021944,0.0003351142,0.00028354654,0.48931682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8990054,0.008073524,0.0302595,0.014980564,0.0011114681,0.00045726693,0.00016787126,0.00020431692,0.04574007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94201505,0.045135934,0.001015393,0.0032435325,0.0057439804,0.0028461704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90083975,0.05855415,0.0049274242,0.013441364,0.008705922,0.013531441],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06339047,0.00071702455,0.001009671,0.00261417,0.008575284,0.020311592,0.001826428,0.0059854146,0.014104892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06952931,0.00065405737,0.0007172792,0.0029515477,0.043698143,0.01753724,0.017809052,0.006553676,0.0015911147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006446502,0.00003551632,0.0016182187,0.00019905939,0.000035464334,0.00014619269,0.0079594795,0.0005549365,0.00010984133,0.9231143,0.023467459,0.042695146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004612725,0.00006341342,0.001203151,0.00092542294,0.000026773965,0.00011287138,0.011135528,0.0008940274,0.00020907211,0.74012494,0.24521075,0.00004793754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116016595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0221474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99738586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015670428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034975994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097755607","doi":"","title":"DU DOCTORAT EN ADMINISTRATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Administration (probate law); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5556789388399359,"score_gpt":0.6030130234459345,"score_spread":0.04733408460599864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097755607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018161247,0.02634763,0.0015878757,0.113458484,0.065445654,0.00018015988,0.0035871586,0.00068151916,0.78689533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010304824,0.008833112,0.00058794743,0.007191736,0.003457197,0.000100275676,0.0007539221,0.00019300607,0.968578],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923274,0.0013692947,0.00053761987,0.001340062,0.0033449407,0.0010806646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872773,0.0010507741,0.000632225,0.0011688296,0.0052849445,0.004585885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034824794,0.0008867038,0.0013864007,0.0020632541,0.0039415616,0.010865788,0.0015923262,0.0043322733,0.4529481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018018495,0.0005437842,0.00072829815,0.002518733,0.0019134688,0.004946789,0.004923924,0.00529686,0.3394137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027974336,0.000031552285,0.00049821986,0.00033328444,0.00000660943,0.00006608942,0.00035280918,0.00006395314,0.00011098241,0.030127622,0.89624494,0.07213608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024673038,0.000009509697,0.00035865404,0.00014869116,0.000001308215,0.000043745604,0.0001078203,0.00001644528,0.000032898486,0.0009808063,0.99829394,0.0000037306838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006572146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011473587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5470519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074241795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021522416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7803031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097874746","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Data collection; Public policy; Ethical issues; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8051501648126124,"score_gpt":0.6217667223505557,"score_spread":0.18338344246205662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097874746","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004935853,0.002930688,0.0006411753,0.0054355855,0.0044271313,0.00056078064,0.88101655,0.001640332,0.102854215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061494955,0.013301804,0.0059398306,0.0016892414,0.00062480837,0.0011314471,0.8122175,0.0013459037,0.15759997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9586319,0.0015300779,0.0081244,0.0029680887,0.024703592,0.0040420974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7028777,0.019524857,0.014860703,0.021607822,0.223325,0.01780399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013497482,0.0030261958,0.005228003,0.09412383,0.011507834,0.029002368,0.0054506417,0.0032920765,0.31950557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14528108,0.002338788,0.0020394868,0.20880069,0.0028041266,0.007125533,0.005739858,0.004368672,0.24209145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026268284,0.000011455907,0.0008134517,0.0012988215,0.000017181646,0.000030881783,0.00010620014,0.000045525554,0.000071043985,0.004192239,0.9671313,0.02625564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010864698,0.000004046004,0.004080848,0.00075770245,0.000020600593,0.000018270304,0.00012538061,0.000045821023,0.00009261258,0.00052727736,0.99427444,0.000042023163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88498294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86764646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88498294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05987843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37547597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097875678","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public access; Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.7390008015493968,"score_gpt":0.6213030290546234,"score_spread":0.11769777249477342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097875678","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014436045,0.0037970254,0.0031688854,0.005472769,0.012439402,0.0006778409,0.56044686,0.0030997067,0.4094538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020899564,0.012516564,0.009945253,0.002583938,0.0033079782,0.0008858698,0.64712626,0.0031982565,0.2995363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998811,0.00011748144,0.000102461505,0.00023107063,0.0005909133,0.00014701912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603903,0.00051107636,0.00029755742,0.0004187917,0.002511981,0.00022151237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009215974,0.0014047314,0.0012821662,0.007079133,0.0011053565,0.008856296,0.0016038739,0.0017646771,0.7353162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009230235,0.00069962715,0.0019002263,0.010981644,0.0004181578,0.0038137203,0.0014997356,0.001973515,0.43337098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007707736,0.000026557449,0.0009852779,0.0009427648,0.00007111976,0.00008592215,0.000048520513,0.0013535904,0.000080285616,0.0067640166,0.96115816,0.028406732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008897634,0.000010713805,0.0026280761,0.0008817299,0.000041659405,0.00003415012,0.00018180745,0.00028041436,0.000116263145,0.0044848733,0.9912305,0.000020853444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043642562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021061286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26468378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027254221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039913547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37753928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099903745","doi":"","title":"Mapping the Social Economy in British Columbia and Alberta: Trends, Patterns, new Directions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); Sustainability; Social economy; Sharing economy; Diversity (politics); Information economy","score_opus":0.3400486148160185,"score_gpt":0.470906453264866,"score_spread":0.13085783844884752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099903745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91464627,0.010132425,0.00118928,0.0044152043,0.00006845811,0.00014442745,0.0107029835,0.0000937547,0.058607202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687028,0.007275608,0.0022389428,0.00040929238,0.000021909565,0.00007822,0.004724431,0.000034944635,0.016513892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890566,0.00011772801,0.000053915537,0.00010525279,0.00046867365,0.0003486664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962901,0.000616782,0.00030681273,0.000117979966,0.0020842464,0.0005840964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011299244,0.00029877972,0.0003591414,0.014215201,0.0037339209,0.0045248754,0.001155925,0.00043008884,0.0032211184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027376723,0.00019415964,0.00019529203,0.036516525,0.0018841991,0.0009769519,0.0019047083,0.0006474677,0.0002951304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015806596,0.00009271966,0.6716709,0.00079485757,0.00012057568,0.0008317223,0.03614701,0.0013425923,0.0019054388,0.009221771,0.019151488,0.25856292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029296484,0.000013508228,0.87791294,0.00025631904,0.000021665634,0.000089227295,0.07378293,0.00051004475,0.0003041222,0.000637825,0.04643258,0.000035873363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03934189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03934189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04475163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2854467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100115131","doi":"","title":"Authorship and Contributorship Influence of Authorship Order and Corresponding Author on Perceptions of Authors ’ Contributions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Perception; Medical journal; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.2784536170536177,"score_gpt":0.5483143853796987,"score_spread":0.26986076832608097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100115131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99623007,0.00012353466,0.0002474741,0.0005464877,0.000022568613,0.0000154438,0.000021734306,0.0000025627287,0.0027901484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956614,0.000067160945,0.00015726399,0.000036748348,0.000013602517,0.000007111014,0.000010421587,0.0000012349795,0.0001403481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817074,0.012469395,0.0014072441,0.00066158525,0.0027445008,0.0010098289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71554214,0.20183784,0.052484855,0.0038641482,0.014620043,0.011650947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019504204,0.00026434494,0.00032319422,0.0019619016,0.0014689105,0.0032011564,0.00036517272,0.00057191006,0.0028641366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11800828,0.00022538217,0.0003790173,0.0016631989,0.0026498062,0.0017943999,0.0017845613,0.0008651538,0.00023912807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054273295,0.0005037781,0.90239763,0.0002489077,0.00012479989,0.00037229116,0.067456536,0.00027282728,0.001062421,0.0017422348,0.0008021613,0.024473678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001330684,0.00051656587,0.86001676,0.00036364,0.00014358462,0.0005089818,0.12730232,0.0016505879,0.0012786847,0.0035273042,0.004486594,0.00007187785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025618603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035930306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016504963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024686004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103149295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100121683","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Runway","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100121683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011471835,0.002913556,0.0065062167,0.010720235,0.009964456,0.00022478354,0.00465878,0.0030625407,0.96080226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009676303,0.0023473357,0.0036939655,0.0041611544,0.0013272759,0.00018392838,0.0039241705,0.0013366827,0.9733493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971956,0.0004674833,0.00018269412,0.00080654945,0.0009801426,0.0003675549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969284,0.00035822034,0.00015012479,0.0008372187,0.0013313944,0.00039471616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016225799,0.0010956138,0.00095001375,0.0018067214,0.0026763235,0.011293466,0.002642226,0.004263191,0.70358616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006668098,0.000611421,0.0010211563,0.0020543486,0.0013812471,0.008470953,0.005751724,0.003825959,0.58257145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008020448,0.000052344476,0.00048066507,0.000369608,0.000015857038,0.00013368262,0.00039583934,0.00013339214,0.00063150993,0.07056219,0.78597873,0.14116597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052380165,0.000007746944,0.00015354603,0.000072934046,0.000002646245,0.000071393886,0.000082820494,0.000066269095,0.00015651534,0.0024677457,0.9969066,0.000006654563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067373207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007075665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29641384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036169344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100224556","doi":"","title":"THE EFFECT OF TENSION AND TIMING OF CONTRACTION ON OXYGEN SATURATION IN THE TRAPEZIUS MASTERS OF SCIENCE DEGREE THESIS AS PART OF THE MASTERS PROGRAMME IN KINANTHROPOLOGIE BY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Degree (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3932977942234205,"score_gpt":0.5029853979905599,"score_spread":0.10968760376713937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100224556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937475,0.0004124365,0.00022716576,0.00029540854,0.00007294224,0.000023571107,0.0000940477,0.0000073956467,0.0051195044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804567,0.00044839858,0.00029295293,0.00008345034,0.00003274698,0.00004534153,0.00015959823,0.000020362013,0.01846039],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998265,0.00004778243,0.000008804628,0.00003599855,0.000036301,0.00004454972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991019,0.0003274204,0.00009003967,0.000037528534,0.00008526939,0.00035782892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063559756,0.00015132477,0.00034746173,0.00019134553,0.00036614283,0.0006127861,0.00029814144,0.0002424468,0.011401891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023451152,0.00012658606,0.00027575484,0.00013916366,0.0003178756,0.00020633728,0.0006605173,0.0005318682,0.0013796043],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031516884,0.011867161,0.24581164,0.000840602,0.00032743515,0.0008600075,0.014898882,0.004810994,0.23781557,0.009188438,0.016290497,0.4257718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002825204,0.0071643023,0.9479346,0.00018867107,0.00015445065,0.00022281295,0.0034244114,0.007333321,0.016709164,0.0025995744,0.013940248,0.000045952387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030601798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038944858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011401891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004221878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052188546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0381431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100281307","doi":"","title":"Reprints and permission:","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citation; Social impact; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Hard and soft science","score_opus":0.8004582169309212,"score_gpt":0.6740130649567473,"score_spread":0.12644515197417394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100281307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00133517,0.0018999409,0.001364623,0.0045575644,0.0065296646,0.00027405028,0.014102333,0.0034863006,0.96645045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0095114745,0.0019604252,0.0011252589,0.0024047194,0.0020750961,0.0001699203,0.012228295,0.001535091,0.96898973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991829,0.00009039285,0.00008805143,0.00019621867,0.00028169766,0.00016076922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997163,0.0009992738,0.00011372632,0.0008040732,0.0003727154,0.0005472635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008633886,0.0014683239,0.0017596722,0.0024850706,0.0010196796,0.004074847,0.0015159291,0.0029677348,0.93491125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007863485,0.0008323185,0.00093770004,0.0026514034,0.0012365021,0.0019066274,0.0021328046,0.0027112646,0.8961624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016892592,0.00023265803,0.00061058253,0.0007524904,0.000024738169,0.0005213079,0.00009540902,0.00015286313,0.0013999011,0.003184705,0.87270916,0.12014717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007737684,0.000056166187,0.0010955741,0.0003423044,0.0000075952894,0.00045541345,0.00006385639,0.00020284734,0.00044242365,0.0027761043,0.9944666,0.000013716341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010177429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014851996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06508875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069214153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009519219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09284115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100358279","doi":"","title":"AU DOCTORAT EN SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVES PAR","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Plenum space; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.710578843908979,"score_gpt":0.6711142444029519,"score_spread":0.0394645995060271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100358279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025859415,0.06109092,0.0029295501,0.1854261,0.08083526,0.00022014075,0.004241987,0.0011162135,0.6615539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010885455,0.02152103,0.0014345319,0.010950818,0.00580771,0.00014195107,0.00095349766,0.00033563422,0.9479693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994294,0.0012902617,0.00039423953,0.0009898258,0.0022476548,0.00078405306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431325,0.0018717666,0.00076489866,0.0015150983,0.0052035656,0.006331359],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004078419,0.0010548201,0.0016615568,0.0019228688,0.0037081917,0.0073191226,0.0015922958,0.0036121856,0.37915996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018508006,0.000549907,0.0008525622,0.002527934,0.0019503866,0.0040085986,0.006080985,0.0058407607,0.26746744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003425686,0.00003653861,0.0005605019,0.0005042182,0.000011568701,0.00008613365,0.0006348188,0.000088843335,0.00016405403,0.014579988,0.91470295,0.068596125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030066965,0.0000073530264,0.0005211096,0.0001855038,0.000002019567,0.000047254794,0.00018099986,0.000028094977,0.000056174336,0.0009895654,0.99797434,0.0000046859627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008218597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017280608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6208401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059487172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02375541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88555294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100643059","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Public policy; Research ethics; Data collection","score_opus":0.8558532632662189,"score_gpt":0.6372503094320134,"score_spread":0.21860295383420547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100643059","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046883436,0.0022009634,0.0004142202,0.0028354488,0.0021872402,0.0003408966,0.91350436,0.0010743722,0.07697366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057027293,0.010187876,0.004097596,0.0009224221,0.00036009718,0.00084866554,0.873828,0.00093220384,0.1031205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96035105,0.0013604029,0.007773058,0.0028969639,0.02367182,0.0039467034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75095457,0.016409487,0.013103513,0.018954113,0.18701904,0.013559206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011501582,0.002854477,0.0048638363,0.11220261,0.011381581,0.027565246,0.005296626,0.0029553964,0.2724099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13401158,0.00230028,0.0019687226,0.24630846,0.0023527415,0.0068144505,0.0057778168,0.0038470493,0.21832496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031121406,0.000011125576,0.0011650963,0.0013799588,0.000020045354,0.00003967811,0.00015554296,0.00005950599,0.0000754372,0.0062133544,0.96495885,0.025890317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009628539,0.0000038368266,0.005322126,0.0006690196,0.00002011178,0.00002367163,0.00014614763,0.000047741363,0.000092553986,0.0006101071,0.9930126,0.000042512736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89109045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8764584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89109045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063650936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3380559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91130185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100697000","doi":"","title":"payment system: Evidence from Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Institution; Personally identifiable information; Order (exchange); Access to information","score_opus":0.7625437398026618,"score_gpt":0.5762092044463163,"score_spread":0.18633453535634548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100697000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80085933,0.03813419,0.0006822075,0.032695517,0.00046558614,0.0003755159,0.024814337,0.00004750779,0.10192586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97297084,0.013677594,0.00027906254,0.0024220299,0.00010654568,0.000061065584,0.003682277,0.000028917118,0.006771694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938024,0.0011493639,0.00078794535,0.00054092903,0.0023159308,0.0014033014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96126753,0.009275259,0.014719949,0.0017270986,0.009396187,0.003613964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034394863,0.0002892808,0.00075738464,0.002968913,0.0025209277,0.0028339187,0.0017877818,0.0008385554,0.021859484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035103086,0.00051488495,0.00079901237,0.011813878,0.0013895148,0.0014323968,0.0018231163,0.00095757894,0.0010696077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014898044,0.00023708073,0.8647259,0.0035051499,0.0006480738,0.0006116615,0.0052125845,0.00036659985,0.000087159926,0.014419946,0.058310326,0.050385654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003004016,0.00007186155,0.9581336,0.0025901732,0.00047053245,0.00018085317,0.004026025,0.00035458227,0.00008905474,0.0011681714,0.032577045,0.000037873862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9349794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06502062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03576373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056738503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2594852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100776278","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.6626260073294132,"score_gpt":0.5997115490804761,"score_spread":0.06291445824893716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100776278","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017872062,0.00408623,0.0036618426,0.0053323926,0.011368646,0.0006637848,0.5454398,0.0033086531,0.42435148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027595557,0.013164882,0.011263983,0.0024932618,0.0032554443,0.0008813601,0.6584419,0.0033850619,0.2795185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988826,0.000110704,0.000097928394,0.00022890586,0.0005402168,0.0001397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966233,0.00043605475,0.00026447867,0.00036323656,0.0021307317,0.00018229798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008701382,0.0013723942,0.001219828,0.006622855,0.0010683317,0.008442476,0.001535817,0.0017243221,0.6863418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007850666,0.0006475633,0.0019177774,0.009938253,0.00040158015,0.003656501,0.0014291131,0.0019063933,0.38022363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009007431,0.000031310767,0.0013833259,0.0010722609,0.00009106737,0.0001082754,0.000059246515,0.0018845093,0.00010524159,0.0082841115,0.95195365,0.034936827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009299151,0.000011776991,0.0033034163,0.0009378108,0.000048576876,0.000039387778,0.00021182328,0.00037064208,0.00013480907,0.0051944614,0.9896311,0.000023164113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043386325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021583289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31365818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025469542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036529691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44739532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100837529","doi":"","title":"STRATIGRAPHY IN THREE QUARRIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stratigraphy; Promotion (chess); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.8668434790401112,"score_gpt":0.6381668803534625,"score_spread":0.2286765986866487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100837529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635773,0.0014380264,0.0004298168,0.0003503118,0.00002655481,0.00005571855,0.00050044985,0.00007469017,0.033547096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248946,0.00032582218,0.00046741357,0.00004129553,0.000014713608,0.000016958484,0.00052072044,0.000023138682,0.0061005466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953926,0.000056981895,0.000024500714,0.00011752539,0.000103772494,0.00015788821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944264,0.00009163295,0.00015071584,0.00004293038,0.00016554745,0.000106538326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042854575,0.00020610054,0.0003370831,0.0024014784,0.0016759927,0.0013711074,0.0007606217,0.00046266953,0.0091545535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010774944,0.0003646191,0.00023111147,0.003466804,0.0014365434,0.00055822823,0.0015477402,0.00047877053,0.001480193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085207674,0.00028237147,0.7217658,0.0006844837,0.00013016412,0.0037995589,0.06800196,0.0014299488,0.013719483,0.022234704,0.0059452984,0.16115414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018573464,0.00018671366,0.9467515,0.0001459777,0.00002719585,0.0004156194,0.010261473,0.00060025876,0.0003196555,0.00086638134,0.040388297,0.000018308403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0575169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17360161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0575169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002009005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010720004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11436421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101185074","doi":"","title":"Based on a Set of Coplanar Straight Lines","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Set theory; Sequence (biology); Intersection (aeronautics); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.7926643600828706,"score_gpt":0.6066663948559656,"score_spread":0.18599796522690493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101185074","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037492793,0.00041003097,0.92889684,0.00029566197,0.00027975152,0.00037909157,0.0016256509,0.0020747609,0.028545484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3681696,0.00080189377,0.5975745,0.00024692813,0.0001848737,0.0007831842,0.005707617,0.00067823235,0.025853308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977043,0.00047332945,0.000114409486,0.0007930002,0.00072665204,0.00018820458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956649,0.0013494706,0.0003963116,0.0007871509,0.0016468854,0.00015531098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010152922,0.0018942234,0.001188858,0.004580256,0.0015488385,0.0031775967,0.002303494,0.001839284,0.02588108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225915,0.0008741782,0.0017700663,0.0044848835,0.0012183737,0.0023965097,0.0015112846,0.0013598152,0.010282948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014533068,0.0005828826,0.008874399,0.0006375582,0.00033918084,0.0011462375,0.00041810807,0.32675597,0.021307541,0.13104665,0.023464955,0.4839732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009982689,0.0002590577,0.0026819878,0.00011327911,0.00008361651,0.000509817,0.00017608306,0.92542887,0.008116612,0.042733207,0.019693926,0.000103871076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005766684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00380108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02588108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010974313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012692339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08658087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039363","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0134","title":"Research Persistence: A Comparative Study of Core and Peripheral Journal Authors in Five Medical Research Topics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Core (optical fiber); Publication; Medical research; Scientific publishing; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Original research","score_opus":0.8119967163500094,"score_gpt":0.654563852756843,"score_spread":0.15743286359316633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995828,0.0010703288,0.00050942414,0.00026904276,0.000021414591,0.000033579407,0.00021258573,0.000016664075,0.002038961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862874,0.0002842368,0.00038049128,0.000051827836,0.000041530766,0.00002773131,0.00022824894,0.000007916918,0.00034934847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860701,0.0037906978,0.0034257728,0.0013512644,0.0042507052,0.0011115399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83068043,0.070891336,0.060925182,0.0064857337,0.016774438,0.014242871],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015793698,0.00021485843,0.0009339284,0.010467239,0.0013982388,0.0037557634,0.0008168393,0.0006746976,0.0022442418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112683445,0.00018909381,0.0006206417,0.012792348,0.0014236295,0.0038813318,0.0035327526,0.0007529369,0.00065945246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024632757,0.0000915063,0.9687732,0.000114421724,0.00010155258,0.00010385728,0.0057985084,0.000037155445,0.00024379304,0.00024118542,0.00024598086,0.02400264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002113653,0.00047228095,0.98221534,0.00007846181,0.000073750096,0.00093974004,0.013338948,0.0002239227,0.00020905059,0.0006016309,0.001800734,0.000025073647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013185894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001905528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98953277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009979265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023855462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083526075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039980","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0014","title":"Study on the Funding Characteristics of English-language Sci-Tech Journals Published in China: Implementation of the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan-II","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; China; Action plan; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Citation; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.3569589056399203,"score_gpt":0.5259805209338575,"score_spread":0.16902161529393722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99751115,0.00022399756,0.0000701407,0.00042276038,0.000013818717,0.00002986651,0.00024500335,0.0000071759237,0.0014762002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844164,0.00012552437,0.000094746516,0.00006527588,0.000021732569,0.00003823949,0.0003806227,0.0000030284548,0.000829169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955432,0.0008738162,0.0006437576,0.00032075527,0.00176998,0.00084862876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96556616,0.006101986,0.012390033,0.0009455498,0.009326676,0.005669567],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076069064,0.0002383228,0.0004690349,0.0045338324,0.0007847295,0.0022214234,0.0008209801,0.00055057096,0.0013443674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022782728,0.00018332672,0.0002993525,0.0075535155,0.0005392565,0.0015129154,0.0012345533,0.00044233652,0.0002800953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012671207,0.00011006008,0.97978485,0.00007037116,0.000051153944,0.00017426169,0.0014680892,0.00019889166,0.0004970936,0.00044066453,0.0009976652,0.016080163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015065738,0.00008113096,0.99592006,0.00001851231,0.000031203897,0.000052470576,0.0014043187,0.00050553214,0.00021740963,0.00007175545,0.0016723282,0.000010165369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025474563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020790754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003158022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010996912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050652564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106110067","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17654000","title":"Regaining control of research assessment. How for-profit companies control scholarly metrics | Reprendre le contrôle de l'évaluation de la recherche. Comment les entreprises à but lucrative contrôlent les indicateurs scientifiques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Presentation (obstetrics); Documentation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.675596831169209,"score_gpt":0.549472064768764,"score_spread":0.126124766400445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106110067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041483156,0.03199727,0.0718786,0.6368257,0.0027417229,0.00034372823,0.00035594098,0.0024698132,0.21190405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8636282,0.006605684,0.01738318,0.055988885,0.0028248292,0.00050101144,0.00018934291,0.0008945287,0.051984366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9017084,0.04738367,0.004721762,0.009797304,0.03035278,0.0060359985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62874955,0.19937596,0.05651012,0.04321367,0.052140027,0.02001068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12550665,0.00082744774,0.0008891844,0.0042589484,0.004371892,0.034217834,0.002815325,0.0068684146,0.009552116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22187954,0.00076081854,0.0008608346,0.004798249,0.018760048,0.029087665,0.01020956,0.0077972114,0.006200666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002699,0.00022701234,0.015148966,0.0010123475,0.00023661196,0.00019578854,0.015793696,0.0025385583,0.0045563634,0.25547156,0.14977163,0.5547776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015922757,0.00026674272,0.030070182,0.0012157494,0.00014219036,0.00034269984,0.010551863,0.00345183,0.0050748154,0.40963757,0.5387805,0.0003065579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012865268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104410555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99574107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012081327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02137793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6637505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106124311","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17653999","title":"Regaining control of research assessment. How for-profit companies control scholarly metrics | Reprendre le contrôle de l'évaluation de la recherche. Comment les entreprises à but lucrative contrôlent les indicateurs scientifiques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Presentation (obstetrics); Documentation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.675596831169209,"score_gpt":0.549472064768764,"score_spread":0.126124766400445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106124311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041483156,0.03199727,0.0718786,0.6368257,0.0027417229,0.00034372823,0.00035594098,0.0024698132,0.21190405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8636282,0.006605684,0.01738318,0.055988885,0.0028248292,0.00050101144,0.00018934291,0.0008945287,0.051984366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9017084,0.04738367,0.004721762,0.009797304,0.03035278,0.0060359985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62874955,0.19937596,0.05651012,0.04321367,0.052140027,0.02001068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12550665,0.00082744774,0.0008891844,0.0042589484,0.004371892,0.034217834,0.002815325,0.0068684146,0.009552116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22187954,0.00076081854,0.0008608346,0.004798249,0.018760048,0.029087665,0.01020956,0.0077972114,0.006200666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002699,0.00022701234,0.015148966,0.0010123475,0.00023661196,0.00019578854,0.015793696,0.0025385583,0.0045563634,0.25547156,0.14977163,0.5547776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015922757,0.00026674272,0.030070182,0.0012157494,0.00014219036,0.00034269984,0.010551863,0.00345183,0.0050748154,0.40963757,0.5387805,0.0003065579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012865268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104410555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99574107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012081327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02137793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6637505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106756452","doi":"10.14429/djlit.20871","title":"DESIDOC Journal of Library Information Technology","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Productivity; Thematic map; Digital library; Bibliometrics; Information technology; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.10150083233291296,"score_gpt":0.4270096613435049,"score_spread":0.3255088290105919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106756452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10481134,0.14162046,0.0034719638,0.031468082,0.0060403524,0.0004905828,0.008786444,0.001217942,0.7020929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58846647,0.14834152,0.0073999744,0.008816122,0.004825714,0.00037943223,0.010239483,0.00038728284,0.2311439],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926548,0.001011367,0.0009731462,0.0005772835,0.0042791697,0.0005042549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98459387,0.0037632578,0.0021138438,0.0013100638,0.006468402,0.0017505249],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00325153,0.00045370072,0.0007465382,0.015839517,0.0032200343,0.021391694,0.00077885116,0.0013204411,0.05057139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013539936,0.000265937,0.00048145166,0.023315247,0.0015796662,0.004930341,0.0038246636,0.0010973964,0.02146658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024108936,0.00026348908,0.05931927,0.0047017545,0.00013511293,0.0020123648,0.005225532,0.00035238836,0.0024706358,0.04426829,0.3350164,0.5459937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010244335,0.00004321429,0.030557068,0.0010183937,0.000049402748,0.0020750554,0.0041878955,0.0002307059,0.0011193734,0.0028736743,0.9578007,0.00003438916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047989935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004795135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051235636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012019218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16917813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108440524","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796394","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108440524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689229,0.03070148,0.0033990622,0.0066031464,0.0013493928,0.00024325753,0.06480708,0.00083461043,0.12313898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458347,0.007886463,0.002307728,0.0003147335,0.0012240264,0.00021477418,0.034479093,0.0002487459,0.0074897995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791844,0.0020141704,0.0026627053,0.0020037498,0.0041432315,0.0012576404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84534985,0.046015132,0.056339692,0.015008944,0.028453479,0.008832825],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011585522,0.00052369107,0.0009111367,0.04963399,0.0015864266,0.007069195,0.0011215087,0.0006113642,0.012851056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07182451,0.0002092836,0.00058799086,0.07933245,0.0014538468,0.0028698007,0.0046966285,0.00066529005,0.0024687496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007517731,0.00017521139,0.62756187,0.0053588185,0.0008892824,0.0014047563,0.013002576,0.0007777514,0.002926707,0.058642734,0.06765603,0.22085258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005519459,0.00007982157,0.80469894,0.0006145827,0.00025209328,0.0008671722,0.006286407,0.00031556966,0.0011582177,0.005412582,0.18020785,0.000051599334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015563716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018562557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020466645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028882776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061270833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108440630","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796405","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108440630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689229,0.03070148,0.0033990622,0.0066031464,0.0013493928,0.00024325753,0.06480708,0.00083461043,0.12313898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458347,0.007886463,0.002307728,0.0003147335,0.0012240264,0.00021477418,0.034479093,0.0002487459,0.0074897995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791844,0.0020141704,0.0026627053,0.0020037498,0.0041432315,0.0012576404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84534985,0.046015132,0.056339692,0.015008944,0.028453479,0.008832825],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011585522,0.00052369107,0.0009111367,0.04963399,0.0015864266,0.007069195,0.0011215087,0.0006113642,0.012851056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07182451,0.0002092836,0.00058799086,0.07933245,0.0014538468,0.0028698007,0.0046966285,0.00066529005,0.0024687496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007517731,0.00017521139,0.62756187,0.0053588185,0.0008892824,0.0014047563,0.013002576,0.0007777514,0.002926707,0.058642734,0.06765603,0.22085258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005519459,0.00007982157,0.80469894,0.0006145827,0.00025209328,0.0008671722,0.006286407,0.00031556966,0.0011582177,0.005412582,0.18020785,0.000051599334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015563716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018562557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020466645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028882776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061270833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108441974","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796460","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108441974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689229,0.03070148,0.0033990622,0.0066031464,0.0013493928,0.00024325753,0.06480708,0.00083461043,0.12313898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458347,0.007886463,0.002307728,0.0003147335,0.0012240264,0.00021477418,0.034479093,0.0002487459,0.0074897995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791844,0.0020141704,0.0026627053,0.0020037498,0.0041432315,0.0012576404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84534985,0.046015132,0.056339692,0.015008944,0.028453479,0.008832825],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011585522,0.00052369107,0.0009111367,0.04963399,0.0015864266,0.007069195,0.0011215087,0.0006113642,0.012851056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07182451,0.0002092836,0.00058799086,0.07933245,0.0014538468,0.0028698007,0.0046966285,0.00066529005,0.0024687496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007517731,0.00017521139,0.62756187,0.0053588185,0.0008892824,0.0014047563,0.013002576,0.0007777514,0.002926707,0.058642734,0.06765603,0.22085258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005519459,0.00007982157,0.80469894,0.0006145827,0.00025209328,0.0008671722,0.006286407,0.00031556966,0.0011582177,0.005412582,0.18020785,0.000051599334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015563716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018562557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020466645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028882776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061270833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108470610","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796449","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108470610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689229,0.03070148,0.0033990622,0.0066031464,0.0013493928,0.00024325753,0.06480708,0.00083461043,0.12313898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458347,0.007886463,0.002307728,0.0003147335,0.0012240264,0.00021477418,0.034479093,0.0002487459,0.0074897995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791844,0.0020141704,0.0026627053,0.0020037498,0.0041432315,0.0012576404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84534985,0.046015132,0.056339692,0.015008944,0.028453479,0.008832825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011585522,0.00052369107,0.0009111367,0.04963399,0.0015864266,0.007069195,0.0011215087,0.0006113642,0.012851056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07182451,0.0002092836,0.00058799086,0.07933245,0.0014538468,0.0028698007,0.0046966285,0.00066529005,0.0024687496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007517731,0.00017521139,0.62756187,0.0053588185,0.0008892824,0.0014047563,0.013002576,0.0007777514,0.002926707,0.058642734,0.06765603,0.22085258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005519459,0.00007982157,0.80469894,0.0006145827,0.00025209328,0.0008671722,0.006286407,0.00031556966,0.0011582177,0.005412582,0.18020785,0.000051599334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015563716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018562557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98841447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020466645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028882776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061270833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108599753","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17809251","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108599753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689229,0.03070148,0.0033990622,0.0066031464,0.0013493928,0.00024325753,0.06480708,0.00083461043,0.12313898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458347,0.007886463,0.002307728,0.0003147335,0.0012240264,0.00021477418,0.034479093,0.0002487459,0.0074897995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791844,0.0020141704,0.0026627053,0.0020037498,0.0041432315,0.0012576404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84534985,0.046015132,0.056339692,0.015008944,0.028453479,0.008832825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011585522,0.00052369107,0.0009111367,0.04963399,0.0015864266,0.007069195,0.0011215087,0.0006113642,0.012851056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07182451,0.0002092836,0.00058799086,0.07933245,0.0014538468,0.0028698007,0.0046966285,0.00066529005,0.0024687496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007517731,0.00017521139,0.62756187,0.0053588185,0.0008892824,0.0014047563,0.013002576,0.0007777514,0.002926707,0.058642734,0.06765603,0.22085258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005519459,0.00007982157,0.80469894,0.0006145827,0.00025209328,0.0008671722,0.006286407,0.00031556966,0.0011582177,0.005412582,0.18020785,0.000051599334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015563716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018562557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98841447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020466645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028882776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061270833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111061362","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871939","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111061362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13789508,0.024917385,0.015538132,0.17551127,0.0009552046,0.00054393697,0.0015229767,0.0005708778,0.64254516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86043406,0.022209164,0.01691687,0.0088069495,0.00019089687,0.0002469854,0.00052006956,0.00016933473,0.09050569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96184266,0.009611791,0.0009829449,0.0016711511,0.019763352,0.0061280048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96654975,0.0072821393,0.0015308305,0.00081236695,0.018013729,0.005811087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016613256,0.0008437804,0.000904986,0.0074867047,0.013568409,0.021901863,0.0021422163,0.0026781184,0.012312384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034345508,0.0005456289,0.0009817849,0.010940717,0.00781536,0.005757238,0.008477804,0.003794627,0.0013084823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003232376,0.00025859426,0.043742876,0.001932783,0.00028184155,0.0007601809,0.022309892,0.0061066616,0.0022002333,0.4639182,0.060592167,0.39757335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008451368,0.00024408268,0.077135414,0.0036230094,0.00031064395,0.00038464618,0.059087835,0.0043561957,0.0037570167,0.06236509,0.78839016,0.00026131814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92802364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1338321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38510323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111357557","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871908","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111357557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13789508,0.024917385,0.015538132,0.17551127,0.0009552046,0.00054393697,0.0015229767,0.0005708778,0.64254516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86043406,0.022209164,0.01691687,0.0088069495,0.00019089687,0.0002469854,0.00052006956,0.00016933473,0.09050569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96184266,0.009611791,0.0009829449,0.0016711511,0.019763352,0.0061280048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96654975,0.0072821393,0.0015308305,0.00081236695,0.018013729,0.005811087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016613256,0.0008437804,0.000904986,0.0074867047,0.013568409,0.021901863,0.0021422163,0.0026781184,0.012312384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034345508,0.0005456289,0.0009817849,0.010940717,0.00781536,0.005757238,0.008477804,0.003794627,0.0013084823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003232376,0.00025859426,0.043742876,0.001932783,0.00028184155,0.0007601809,0.022309892,0.0061066616,0.0022002333,0.4639182,0.060592167,0.39757335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008451368,0.00024408268,0.077135414,0.0036230094,0.00031064395,0.00038464618,0.059087835,0.0043561957,0.0037570167,0.06236509,0.78839016,0.00026131814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92802364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1338321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1338321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38510323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111416491","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871907","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111416491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13789508,0.024917385,0.015538132,0.17551127,0.0009552046,0.00054393697,0.0015229767,0.0005708778,0.64254516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86043406,0.022209164,0.01691687,0.0088069495,0.00019089687,0.0002469854,0.00052006956,0.00016933473,0.09050569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96184266,0.009611791,0.0009829449,0.0016711511,0.019763352,0.0061280048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96654975,0.0072821393,0.0015308305,0.00081236695,0.018013729,0.005811087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016613256,0.0008437804,0.000904986,0.0074867047,0.013568409,0.021901863,0.0021422163,0.0026781184,0.012312384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034345508,0.0005456289,0.0009817849,0.010940717,0.00781536,0.005757238,0.008477804,0.003794627,0.0013084823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003232376,0.00025859426,0.043742876,0.001932783,0.00028184155,0.0007601809,0.022309892,0.0061066616,0.0022002333,0.4639182,0.060592167,0.39757335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008451368,0.00024408268,0.077135414,0.0036230094,0.00031064395,0.00038464618,0.059087835,0.0043561957,0.0037570167,0.06236509,0.78839016,0.00026131814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92802364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1338321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38510323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112252642","doi":"","title":"MSI Working Paper","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Elite; Quality (philosophy); Sample (material); Work (physics); Perception","score_opus":0.7282127685657008,"score_gpt":0.5810132421200462,"score_spread":0.1471995264456546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112252642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056453724,0.015283076,0.0024194885,0.08821068,0.03052326,0.00043042304,0.044256054,0.0011015362,0.8121302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057685096,0.016623376,0.003206859,0.012962154,0.011483629,0.0006874913,0.052497726,0.0009797564,0.8438739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973545,0.0004121617,0.00022613283,0.0005533604,0.0010601928,0.00039363303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332595,0.0011697169,0.0005218606,0.0010593474,0.0028492203,0.0010738984],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033888281,0.0008013303,0.0009372605,0.0029478665,0.0017348974,0.009748437,0.0017282664,0.0037393707,0.3117144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016855601,0.00033998842,0.00074488844,0.0044024927,0.0006196662,0.004657932,0.0024788184,0.0032080605,0.18258621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008074837,0.000050336144,0.0010474239,0.0002530953,0.000019110987,0.00010120061,0.00013611448,0.00012584584,0.00014223148,0.026318356,0.90525365,0.066472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022213668,0.000014212328,0.0012902125,0.00023295794,0.000009619908,0.000055268756,0.000121349214,0.00006993292,0.00013753172,0.0033183305,0.9947212,0.000007194912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044961427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025222423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99705213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036755411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007120346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98175585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115570790","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17940151","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Actions des parties prenantes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3795851398800293,"score_gpt":0.42673995916209534,"score_spread":0.04715481928206605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115570790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19242232,0.018144127,0.10877507,0.13875441,0.001468118,0.0022886267,0.002750441,0.0018720442,0.53352475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64874995,0.012238079,0.10645746,0.008906987,0.00018904965,0.0008165415,0.0013121134,0.0004053604,0.22092447],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707,0.005112915,0.0006799636,0.0020770112,0.011391056,0.003669014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242307,0.0035177723,0.00073632225,0.0011100981,0.009501977,0.0027108456],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017888913,0.0007901091,0.0007433603,0.00533981,0.014799265,0.015394694,0.0024920958,0.0032205766,0.0115445545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020098926,0.00070665404,0.0012403782,0.0070071323,0.005500135,0.006062364,0.009107443,0.0041089715,0.0017815934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004286682,0.00030182704,0.034703735,0.0014352323,0.0002808608,0.0015106449,0.039218113,0.007274663,0.00959822,0.3395127,0.05005272,0.5156827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059775077,0.00017858157,0.031988107,0.0014118992,0.00018736637,0.0003041751,0.035673138,0.004725569,0.00560307,0.035296164,0.8843239,0.0002481699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92667514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9403728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07949745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27296227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57679707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115598168","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17940150","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Actions des parties prenantes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3795851398800293,"score_gpt":0.42673995916209534,"score_spread":0.04715481928206605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115598168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19242232,0.018144127,0.10877507,0.13875441,0.001468118,0.0022886267,0.002750441,0.0018720442,0.53352475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64874995,0.012238079,0.10645746,0.008906987,0.00018904965,0.0008165415,0.0013121134,0.0004053604,0.22092447],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707,0.005112915,0.0006799636,0.0020770112,0.011391056,0.003669014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242307,0.0035177723,0.00073632225,0.0011100981,0.009501977,0.0027108456],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017888913,0.0007901091,0.0007433603,0.00533981,0.014799265,0.015394694,0.0024920958,0.0032205766,0.0115445545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020098926,0.00070665404,0.0012403782,0.0070071323,0.005500135,0.006062364,0.009107443,0.0041089715,0.0017815934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004286682,0.00030182704,0.034703735,0.0014352323,0.0002808608,0.0015106449,0.039218113,0.007274663,0.00959822,0.3395127,0.05005272,0.5156827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059775077,0.00017858157,0.031988107,0.0014118992,0.00018736637,0.0003041751,0.035673138,0.004725569,0.00560307,0.035296164,0.8843239,0.0002481699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92667514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9403728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07949745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27296227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57679707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117119183","doi":"10.4103/ijors.ijors_18_25","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Foreign Orthopaedics Research in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2007–2024): Trends, Impact and International Collaboration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Thematic analysis; Citation impact; Joint (building)","score_opus":0.3336678912474889,"score_gpt":0.5643112494340826,"score_spread":0.2306433581865937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117119183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603372,0.035692677,0.0012090186,0.0026416308,0.00033425126,0.0002464022,0.061642576,0.00040415235,0.037492085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638866,0.011885945,0.00091575406,0.00010505541,0.0003035227,0.00015149679,0.021191027,0.000041257692,0.0015192188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912949,0.0010510071,0.0019909795,0.0005828744,0.004526304,0.00055395224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671122,0.010431555,0.010845043,0.0011779454,0.009160918,0.0012723103],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050387545,0.0004226684,0.0011845772,0.11176205,0.0009314177,0.004948648,0.00072968897,0.00045612044,0.0033756627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033339612,0.0001476221,0.0012332099,0.19482768,0.0006798179,0.0024499763,0.002019505,0.00043951895,0.0010434123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015657532,0.00009854197,0.8700365,0.0043445993,0.000940853,0.0003880467,0.002046151,0.0011250225,0.0006198837,0.003001628,0.012662039,0.104580246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010245561,0.00006198843,0.96732974,0.00080124225,0.0003370219,0.0005350782,0.0037699298,0.0013162075,0.00050089415,0.0006731688,0.024622483,0.000042018055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011689027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010492903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88823795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027801874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004504733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026647806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117252042","doi":"10.17742/image29731","title":"Un/Sustainable Peer Review and Generative AI: Ethical Gaps, Editorial Acceleration, and the Whitewashing of Technological Solutionism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Imaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Generative grammar; Quality (philosophy); Ethical issues; Peer review","score_opus":0.2452509263862717,"score_gpt":0.6085155508647013,"score_spread":0.36326462447842967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117252042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039105557,0.02112723,0.10732409,0.594306,0.020112116,0.0004890746,0.00019170328,0.0010221888,0.2163221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84767646,0.008869126,0.053241134,0.043070823,0.016133405,0.00091408234,0.00013250894,0.0010980166,0.028864393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6463893,0.24614926,0.014146954,0.013060989,0.07456826,0.0056853066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27540046,0.50150645,0.04014401,0.095943734,0.07157089,0.015434456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26730362,0.0008232026,0.001258625,0.005852357,0.012387938,0.033087168,0.003658878,0.0071039726,0.009803885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5059942,0.00088243483,0.0008360398,0.005492196,0.04527203,0.024513107,0.013705201,0.008313129,0.0027957628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016085964,0.000079750695,0.00423407,0.0016663732,0.000104146835,0.00033379468,0.029503504,0.00079039234,0.0012718077,0.6569575,0.06919426,0.2357036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007446822,0.00008843894,0.0029514963,0.0017374441,0.000047577283,0.00038686165,0.009944387,0.0021246204,0.0017018616,0.6234468,0.35739103,0.00010494654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019027593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034685542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077624456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028620768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9035451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117300270","doi":"10.1111/mec.70210","title":"Editorial 2026","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Editorial board; Publishing; Competition (biology); Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Evolutionary ecology","score_opus":0.25370108469908864,"score_gpt":0.570154692688483,"score_spread":0.3164536079893943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117300270","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001935857,0.0025297203,0.00063852314,0.018479954,0.9039265,0.00014817767,0.00065965456,0.0006773941,0.07274649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027591086,0.0037477077,0.0006633888,0.018565116,0.5714259,0.00014353168,0.0012423366,0.0006145141,0.4008384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960842,0.00044104303,0.0004349291,0.0008167343,0.0018408699,0.00038221292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817855,0.0026646531,0.001180722,0.0012156582,0.009079303,0.0040742117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032712156,0.0018158245,0.0014451707,0.0028063608,0.0022176248,0.009102014,0.002198876,0.004397152,0.5041932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021378642,0.000628135,0.0013922203,0.0010710383,0.0012222257,0.0032929685,0.002153079,0.004749629,0.41839564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002520799,0.000009746075,0.00005033275,0.0001285689,0.000004224055,0.000082479724,0.000010909695,0.000015602593,0.00012231413,0.0005072302,0.98012805,0.018915324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010226545,0.0000108913955,0.000087486325,0.00010798567,0.000003098499,0.000099798155,0.00002241155,0.00003085435,0.00006979656,0.00034229783,0.99921024,0.0000048931133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007104456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013549783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015647166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027214796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7072083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117607505","doi":"10.5530/irc.2.3.38","title":"Scientometric Analysis of the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation Reflected as Publish or Perish","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Information Research Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Publication; Publishing; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Citation","score_opus":0.80204099112816,"score_gpt":0.7107137527623233,"score_spread":0.09132723836583667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117607505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8159219,0.011532037,0.010932775,0.0034120933,0.0008983655,0.0015709008,0.045770023,0.0008373456,0.109124675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624578,0.0055819447,0.009386353,0.0001837621,0.00076540164,0.0012861873,0.015215772,0.00013830446,0.004984553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681719,0.005947372,0.005175543,0.0010366081,0.01857001,0.0010985538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89330375,0.052172743,0.022920838,0.00600085,0.023047779,0.0025540874],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021152927,0.0007126005,0.001368776,0.08335195,0.0014021845,0.007944182,0.00080317724,0.00077556574,0.0049229963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09932432,0.00021973938,0.001699422,0.12252027,0.001313099,0.0037821177,0.0027321773,0.00079481525,0.0017092549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005253246,0.0003735966,0.6143215,0.005842292,0.00080245687,0.0005225572,0.00612973,0.003566167,0.0029360116,0.013991043,0.026352935,0.32463652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034043565,0.00043815165,0.91517836,0.0007137799,0.0003737103,0.0008339084,0.007312536,0.00482952,0.0034346129,0.005649636,0.061080735,0.000121090256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019037139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020363117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91664803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002452782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005047744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11186874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118122950","doi":"10.58742/bmj.v4i1.213","title":"Renaming the Problem: Why ‘Non-Recommended Journals’ Is Preferable To ‘Predatory’ in Academic Publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Barw Medical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Constructive; Cognitive reframing; Exploit; Compromise; Terminology","score_opus":0.5591919613598079,"score_gpt":0.5994016658101877,"score_spread":0.04020970445037986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118122950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016482739,0.011900728,0.009174384,0.9019991,0.013057672,0.00007414752,0.00004295072,0.0002284861,0.04703975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5648256,0.010249052,0.017707888,0.37690014,0.013318415,0.00022505238,0.00004697668,0.0009665136,0.015760215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83623487,0.11276232,0.009102113,0.008100359,0.030728653,0.003071774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6585486,0.24849507,0.021063317,0.01759477,0.045098137,0.009200131],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08895653,0.00044406785,0.0007818811,0.0031420398,0.012970717,0.038760617,0.003884187,0.01693462,0.00698915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2832114,0.0007747038,0.0008736378,0.0042133485,0.06368024,0.032598443,0.008571247,0.01598803,0.0034361097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001432219,0.000068457506,0.003759304,0.0011604964,0.00006663575,0.0009846103,0.089822486,0.00014916147,0.00078972057,0.64515793,0.19404475,0.06385318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009615647,0.00014874579,0.0030868473,0.00290079,0.00006488166,0.002248293,0.061441995,0.0005369323,0.0013928378,0.23701821,0.69084895,0.00021535654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00481368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006324803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98306537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011569138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011836655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47045273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118131136","doi":"10.25165/j.ijabe.20251806.10377","title":"Nobel paradox: China’s publication surge and the elusive prize","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of agricultural and biological engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Underpinning; Transformative learning; Incentive; Unintended consequences; Chinese academy of sciences","score_opus":0.1702341252169197,"score_gpt":0.4471574749078078,"score_spread":0.27692334969088805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118131136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22962661,0.009942718,0.006371282,0.62813944,0.006589904,0.00007616035,0.0003283961,0.00020899416,0.11871651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94205683,0.0022935374,0.0008828548,0.036978524,0.0023822524,0.000056235822,0.00007332512,0.000048345984,0.015228192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236965,0.0023971158,0.00037376094,0.0009923714,0.0025076964,0.0013594523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795538,0.008637402,0.0027661247,0.0019199784,0.0033237906,0.0037989118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015766658,0.00033424163,0.0006370622,0.0026344978,0.009701026,0.010661666,0.0016742838,0.0054711965,0.005275123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025945064,0.00029037587,0.0006196319,0.0035594178,0.012435462,0.0077219456,0.0056562843,0.0054177833,0.00040210635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016807827,0.00003745872,0.010892735,0.00023314447,0.000070721195,0.001001362,0.010384186,0.00094543357,0.00074941316,0.8687715,0.065115795,0.04163015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015789998,0.0001615064,0.025748698,0.000323249,0.00007721587,0.00034874308,0.007783399,0.0032022735,0.00083889527,0.5675165,0.39366364,0.00017792224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011061628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011399536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01183979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02203762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08590412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119251651","doi":"","title":"In need of publishing a paper to find a job or grant? Co-authorship without contributing: The rise of an ethical problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Ethical issues; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.7845689771021718,"score_gpt":0.7151680030549812,"score_spread":0.06940097404719059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119251651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021222322,0.0061917882,0.009168792,0.9408701,0.03019474,0.00012001818,0.00006010586,0.0002752961,0.010996884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11353958,0.026618175,0.03865254,0.7056742,0.074549824,0.0013630226,0.0003074387,0.0025217028,0.036773607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.45370987,0.37093604,0.036408465,0.02027141,0.11176503,0.006909258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11179187,0.61537176,0.056958824,0.07092962,0.09893593,0.046012033],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3311572,0.0011644319,0.0025522194,0.0042032753,0.014079398,0.044514004,0.0071428088,0.020826088,0.016289331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7327577,0.0017530642,0.0018375692,0.006724591,0.04647432,0.038015425,0.014204927,0.04245775,0.02097942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001616003,0.0001537352,0.0029156052,0.0020366109,0.00015420596,0.0024901112,0.02941806,0.00019613249,0.0009817774,0.11337739,0.6784614,0.16965337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068056914,0.00009355069,0.0009970331,0.0038655591,0.0000403644,0.0047900965,0.023771433,0.00056779495,0.00093382626,0.13527595,0.8293668,0.00022957318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016288053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014711616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9791739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009605319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03962684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8248023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119404143","doi":"","title":"Um ano de e-mails não solicitados: o modus operandi de revistas e editoras predatórias","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Directory; National library; Publishing","score_opus":0.7632678173847524,"score_gpt":0.7221280159115916,"score_spread":0.041139801473160764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119404143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017695,0.017209824,0.009133158,0.023908073,0.0025881303,0.0030768374,0.0069801426,0.0006092187,0.034725096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95171845,0.00776718,0.015292654,0.006683663,0.002290441,0.0025703674,0.0017543558,0.00019439765,0.011728628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9441735,0.020383615,0.011345402,0.0038992048,0.017987158,0.0022110783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5801,0.23030387,0.11486333,0.013163261,0.05450774,0.0070617716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050408274,0.0008935542,0.001095821,0.015056129,0.0025433952,0.008616986,0.0016283683,0.0023524638,0.013652796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28574058,0.00072730146,0.00092077494,0.015391876,0.0023596876,0.0074050683,0.0049415175,0.0015509578,0.0032132145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011235351,0.00036697264,0.6847299,0.007778201,0.0003260326,0.0015213119,0.040795024,0.00014942585,0.0025311045,0.004220101,0.019468892,0.2369895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015973901,0.0010015826,0.73888826,0.012775526,0.0011332514,0.0047678053,0.085047334,0.0012043569,0.0045897774,0.0045289327,0.14568926,0.00021415453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023210559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029977444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003384803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007831313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26658762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120829211","doi":"","title":"Twenty years of scientific production in sport and exercise psychology journals: A Bibliometric Analysis in Web of Science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Institution; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Physical activity; Knowledge production; Behavioural sciences; Sport psychology","score_opus":0.14269478224809987,"score_gpt":0.4152865905331163,"score_spread":0.2725918082850164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120829211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91462165,0.041161466,0.0017998487,0.0011422999,0.0002985841,0.0003751017,0.02989585,0.00019851576,0.010506733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96599346,0.012611526,0.0024446482,0.000096778116,0.00038560512,0.00037916878,0.01620261,0.000050572715,0.0018356077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98795986,0.001907473,0.003631171,0.0008706666,0.005197619,0.00043316447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563925,0.018625189,0.013707281,0.001531178,0.00812099,0.0016227973],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008429123,0.0005379638,0.0013006161,0.103979185,0.001041321,0.0041990844,0.00063619274,0.0007341782,0.0028829062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03646636,0.00027863227,0.001866783,0.11497915,0.00065401715,0.0031506692,0.002212182,0.00044761295,0.0010140036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002233646,0.00012385852,0.90111166,0.0033297436,0.001428147,0.00060230214,0.0018176188,0.0006068568,0.0007641011,0.00073892367,0.0050725946,0.08418078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020086472,0.00016333326,0.9713858,0.00060226594,0.0006723575,0.0011179913,0.0020931556,0.0012034284,0.0005353306,0.0005184867,0.021643631,0.0000440583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002862021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033297893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013092421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025784674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044578016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120854504","doi":"","title":"Publication rules in biomedical journals: their compliance with the “test of nine”","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Medical journal; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.1680521653735,"score_gpt":0.3918029718888113,"score_spread":0.2237508065153113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120854504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26807597,0.01648545,0.13233417,0.28761294,0.03365771,0.006988266,0.006199922,0.0021409327,0.24650462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751619,0.0024579538,0.07102511,0.03385194,0.0038935808,0.0036883373,0.0016056036,0.0006236508,0.007691944],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.33315873,0.23903698,0.13394137,0.027017863,0.2566385,0.010206602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.055905573,0.66559356,0.1030525,0.06733267,0.09833022,0.0097854845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4498105,0.0007649448,0.002312701,0.015781725,0.007152135,0.01997219,0.0059548444,0.007957089,0.005045206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.81159085,0.0014535106,0.0029912982,0.016316362,0.01944426,0.014937702,0.011088572,0.009059561,0.0019381422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023755848,0.0005432665,0.27905074,0.005110498,0.001251202,0.0010365392,0.030612243,0.0017291172,0.0015214802,0.2433769,0.09679184,0.3366006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006559152,0.0017032772,0.26018512,0.0092760725,0.0007106748,0.003649618,0.025171643,0.008698371,0.0050716647,0.25121173,0.43277243,0.0008935772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054339073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005009947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087529225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036015242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67848164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129105391","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2026.2624076","title":"How 20 years of key contributions to the journal provide us with a timely and important research strategy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock)","score_opus":0.3259434543321141,"score_gpt":0.5727642171573398,"score_spread":0.24682076282522575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129105391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019579032,0.037886143,0.0016245531,0.626495,0.3162296,0.00010711212,0.0015245773,0.00042627173,0.013748727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051790398,0.10716283,0.014468709,0.3707205,0.37362257,0.00055115786,0.004561157,0.0018321162,0.07529056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704264,0.007319564,0.0030002885,0.002980282,0.012555871,0.0037177114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7276651,0.063240744,0.025570743,0.016393587,0.10797933,0.059150543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04075613,0.0017782841,0.0018316767,0.009961476,0.0072789197,0.04407547,0.0021978156,0.012081322,0.038614824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23318163,0.0010490472,0.0013882185,0.008049658,0.0053585772,0.041541126,0.010951791,0.016417919,0.03637436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015652676,0.000080934944,0.0022190246,0.00163594,0.00010010138,0.00024050199,0.00093786896,0.00008678384,0.0006609313,0.019317662,0.9021959,0.072368056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026854897,0.00006627687,0.0026047209,0.0018536976,0.000056209676,0.00020031219,0.0024060113,0.000075059645,0.00024678046,0.017522335,0.9748642,0.000077685436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003171392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008876803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046140836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025039542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21554154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132859097","doi":"","title":"An examination of the co-authorship patterns in medical publications","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Transparency (behavior); Organizational structure; Strategic planning; Order (exchange); Productivity; Value (mathematics); Promotion (chess)","score_opus":0.5351193567946937,"score_gpt":0.6305372661129569,"score_spread":0.09541790931826322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132859097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835126,0.0016447965,0.0009139249,0.00083857664,0.00006916258,0.000054763368,0.0036178208,0.00006691115,0.009281521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922023,0.00082232326,0.0020879845,0.000058599075,0.00014057723,0.000041211042,0.0024977797,0.000024641493,0.0021244818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323916,0.0012830792,0.0018331297,0.00086394104,0.0023261453,0.00045456667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8853034,0.05308958,0.03927911,0.0056127594,0.013833708,0.0028815004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038581884,0.00019010947,0.00033452312,0.028546473,0.0011037156,0.0030172982,0.0004867542,0.00056500017,0.0034548466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044507973,0.0001779773,0.0003175215,0.039303426,0.0009411891,0.0023262436,0.0015200343,0.00042629993,0.0012694442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017798107,0.000065177286,0.9196611,0.00032302798,0.000110356355,0.00037073754,0.0045588366,0.00014778048,0.0051081143,0.0017738909,0.0020595815,0.065643415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005549002,0.00004066225,0.98759407,0.000062314684,0.000021409403,0.0010834754,0.0030157021,0.00056687545,0.0008546004,0.0011226794,0.0056121503,0.000020546813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014693919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038603058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007622242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097319094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020404339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132989872","doi":"","title":"Mathematics research in India today: What does theliterature reveal?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tamil; New delhi; Uttar pradesh; Citation; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.6138653802982653,"score_gpt":0.6417905229887783,"score_spread":0.02792514269051294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132989872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026543377,0.6349858,0.000823255,0.29745498,0.012112118,0.000026179898,0.002521344,0.00021963833,0.02531337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19359992,0.7307038,0.0011171639,0.05071192,0.015211529,0.000063590305,0.0029194646,0.00012445178,0.005548263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913406,0.0014978547,0.0008010831,0.0012548574,0.0031045522,0.002001067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705145,0.011483107,0.0052238116,0.0025551887,0.0071446206,0.0030787853],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006801573,0.0011393146,0.0015594584,0.010790831,0.004255179,0.01936988,0.002029222,0.0027739345,0.012205947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014483419,0.00093834795,0.0012513846,0.03456212,0.008165442,0.015438057,0.0057341135,0.006521254,0.00392094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002995064,0.00028666042,0.05669139,0.017525315,0.00028638795,0.001153127,0.018083476,0.00045880867,0.001550319,0.06393383,0.27520773,0.5645234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016758886,0.00014573353,0.12992778,0.0072064647,0.00018814715,0.002255873,0.019980479,0.00027306646,0.00071365054,0.018088939,0.8209648,0.00023828437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031728994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038582318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012804622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016552385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09290451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134613536","doi":"","title":"The rise in subscription fees and the gold open access publishing, examined from financial reports of major publishers","year":2024,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Financial plan; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Financial services","score_opus":0.30010216013937585,"score_gpt":0.4569942950357946,"score_spread":0.15689213489641873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134613536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020427,0.008046234,0.00075406395,0.014912359,0.00080646283,0.00005317723,0.004792862,0.00016776173,0.06842435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99048984,0.0012450537,0.00023483949,0.00043630076,0.0007028692,0.000010248312,0.0009890761,0.00003114043,0.0058605713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896157,0.0013628909,0.0014047865,0.0007164544,0.0058708536,0.0010292606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74173254,0.1267457,0.066105135,0.0067533967,0.041282546,0.017380651],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010969439,0.00021817049,0.00045460922,0.012692675,0.0014936251,0.010644554,0.0009867807,0.0013132753,0.0062611327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12799107,0.00026270552,0.0004681076,0.01726871,0.0021682892,0.0058273477,0.0023626674,0.0017543763,0.0010732576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010111926,0.0001491101,0.8489381,0.0003423769,0.00016191552,0.00078905415,0.0046039214,0.00033483063,0.0009646659,0.039684605,0.017199995,0.0858202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030099514,0.00017091446,0.96228665,0.00010229418,0.000114579125,0.00049673603,0.003967538,0.00063154195,0.0012821368,0.0036513407,0.027212195,0.00005396826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008866602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010336837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99901325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00372393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035074025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058012664},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7135781364","doi":"","title":"Ranking national research systems by citation indicators:A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalized counting methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Genome Canada; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Stem Cell Network; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Citation analysis; Key (lock); Information system; Comparative research","score_opus":0.6347261608904581,"score_gpt":0.6049857194261016,"score_spread":0.029740441464356504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135781364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83711433,0.021705607,0.1073485,0.0013531995,0.00033684456,0.00047955458,0.0028270676,0.0003814538,0.02845355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91769564,0.004231506,0.07355368,0.00012740867,0.00015123258,0.00028369256,0.0024591568,0.0001364153,0.0013613541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9456319,0.03193682,0.0033772183,0.0026106106,0.0146136815,0.0018296636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7666637,0.17737316,0.011750066,0.016115753,0.025734402,0.002362917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055737488,0.0010493016,0.00454008,0.051496375,0.0024313128,0.008151123,0.0025933415,0.0013272674,0.005939343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18212749,0.00050589326,0.0036839128,0.05548817,0.0021787032,0.014006315,0.0037923239,0.0009864545,0.0005232542],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040628817,0.00048711844,0.14410271,0.004558503,0.006662738,0.00014319138,0.003900132,0.016476091,0.0015920096,0.0756977,0.0052313763,0.7370856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006479524,0.0033792544,0.52734184,0.0025619562,0.0107087875,0.0007368623,0.015223336,0.17356169,0.005397696,0.22449242,0.035208844,0.0007393429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049713464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052395226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003839871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2947715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136059145","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040624","title":"The Forensic A-Index: A New Citation Algorithm for Restoring Integrity in Scientific Metrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Exploit; Metric (unit); Citation; Adversarial system; Mathematical proof; Programmer; Vulnerability (computing); Ranking (information retrieval); Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.4834213574431999,"score_gpt":0.4792362081161281,"score_spread":0.004185149327071813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136059145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054119597,0.00043016937,0.9860524,0.0008191474,0.00028795446,0.00014917384,0.00029675078,0.002278533,0.0042738696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.109247774,0.0006431873,0.8793732,0.00043309797,0.00053225365,0.0004748576,0.00088172645,0.001008499,0.0074055013],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.994414,0.0015561777,0.0005109705,0.00084152847,0.002421158,0.00025618338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346776,0.006758752,0.0017187347,0.0038151818,0.0035541437,0.0006854206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007257681,0.0013841445,0.0018434146,0.009440516,0.0024496475,0.0066782217,0.003933079,0.0029986524,0.008009424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060845736,0.00067749986,0.0012541136,0.00696245,0.0032639522,0.010443134,0.007343101,0.003771126,0.0046507],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022914608,0.00012090032,0.0026304408,0.00023760926,0.00009631021,0.00009707843,0.00037574864,0.058604322,0.0028600874,0.2883538,0.018325495,0.6280691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057759407,0.00011921937,0.0005105377,0.0001174025,0.000034302284,0.00018536425,0.00014470918,0.6426971,0.004854981,0.3256325,0.025575522,0.00007056235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025520313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002415728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024195288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050796536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03838277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136068604","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040623","title":"The Forensic A-Index: A New Citation Algorithm for Restoring Integrity in Scientific Metrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Exploit; Metric (unit); Citation; Adversarial system; Mathematical proof; Programmer; Vulnerability (computing); Ranking (information retrieval); Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.4834213574431999,"score_gpt":0.4792362081161281,"score_spread":0.004185149327071813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136068604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054119597,0.00043016937,0.9860524,0.0008191474,0.00028795446,0.00014917384,0.00029675078,0.002278533,0.0042738696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.109247774,0.0006431873,0.8793732,0.00043309797,0.00053225365,0.0004748576,0.00088172645,0.001008499,0.0074055013],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994414,0.0015561777,0.0005109705,0.00084152847,0.002421158,0.00025618338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346776,0.006758752,0.0017187347,0.0038151818,0.0035541437,0.0006854206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007257681,0.0013841445,0.0018434146,0.009440516,0.0024496475,0.0066782217,0.003933079,0.0029986524,0.008009424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060845736,0.00067749986,0.0012541136,0.00696245,0.0032639522,0.010443134,0.007343101,0.003771126,0.0046507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022914608,0.00012090032,0.0026304408,0.00023760926,0.00009631021,0.00009707843,0.00037574864,0.058604322,0.0028600874,0.2883538,0.018325495,0.6280691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057759407,0.00011921937,0.0005105377,0.0001174025,0.000034302284,0.00018536425,0.00014470918,0.6426971,0.004854981,0.3256325,0.025575522,0.00007056235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025520313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002415728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024195288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050796536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03838277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136368024","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040871","title":"The Science of Truth: A Rigorous Mathematical Framework for Integrity-Aware Scientific Metrics via the Forensic A-Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematical proof; Stochastic game; Reciprocal; Metric (unit); Credibility; Deadlock; Cartel","score_opus":0.37177830170050546,"score_gpt":0.4731904673962581,"score_spread":0.10141216569575262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136368024","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005412407,0.00037916392,0.9837678,0.002450172,0.000115782146,0.00004978398,0.0001128883,0.00009137406,0.007620593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4416201,0.0016828133,0.5456035,0.0010383403,0.0009832365,0.0005033532,0.00028177962,0.00029042095,0.007996444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928439,0.0032398135,0.00039559978,0.0010207951,0.0021404182,0.00035940539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97786295,0.014001168,0.0021186627,0.0032851999,0.0020097075,0.0007223691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012631602,0.0010747055,0.0015132243,0.0057135196,0.0020367943,0.0071292715,0.0029069271,0.003327157,0.004104566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049533833,0.00067150884,0.001531789,0.0035903617,0.011467786,0.015728263,0.006694579,0.0062679,0.0012364674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004947904,0.000006428879,0.000118949414,0.00001955986,0.0000056692033,0.000012367336,0.00003979745,0.0059745624,0.00013659784,0.988305,0.00048750348,0.0048886063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032042128,0.000010380907,0.000049477378,0.000022859711,0.0000042019087,0.000026139294,0.000015231029,0.06343822,0.00023256899,0.9341607,0.0020256813,0.000011401663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000861457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052198296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004077425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029134648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06680304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7137249366","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040870","title":"The Science of Truth: A Rigorous Mathematical Framework for Integrity-Aware Scientific Metrics via the Forensic A-Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematical proof; Stochastic game; Reciprocal; Metric (unit); Credibility; Deadlock; Cartel","score_opus":0.37177830170050546,"score_gpt":0.4731904673962581,"score_spread":0.10141216569575262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7137249366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005412407,0.00037916392,0.9837678,0.002450172,0.000115782146,0.00004978398,0.0001128883,0.00009137406,0.007620593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4416201,0.0016828133,0.5456035,0.0010383403,0.0009832365,0.0005033532,0.00028177962,0.00029042095,0.007996444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928439,0.0032398135,0.00039559978,0.0010207951,0.0021404182,0.00035940539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97786295,0.014001168,0.0021186627,0.0032851999,0.0020097075,0.0007223691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012631602,0.0010747055,0.0015132243,0.0057135196,0.0020367943,0.0071292715,0.0029069271,0.003327157,0.004104566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049533833,0.00067150884,0.001531789,0.0035903617,0.011467786,0.015728263,0.006694579,0.0062679,0.0012364674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004947904,0.000006428879,0.000118949414,0.00001955986,0.0000056692033,0.000012367336,0.00003979745,0.0059745624,0.00013659784,0.988305,0.00048750348,0.0048886063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032042128,0.000010380907,0.000049477378,0.000022859711,0.0000042019087,0.000026139294,0.000015231029,0.06343822,0.00023256899,0.9341607,0.0020256813,0.000011401663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000861457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052198296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99667287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004077425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029134648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06680304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160408634","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.20056498","title":"Contribution of Jadavpur University in S&T as reflected in WoS Database during 2006-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Audience measurement; Originality; Scientometrics; Web of science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Impact factor","score_opus":0.5815010934234042,"score_gpt":0.6058091931869432,"score_spread":0.02430809976353898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160408634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7712593,0.049072936,0.0006107173,0.0066141775,0.00083933317,0.00020536884,0.13452767,0.00046133838,0.036409087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88888407,0.03917414,0.00158499,0.00063500315,0.0007591901,0.0002227513,0.060091175,0.000100375364,0.0085482355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938212,0.0006174028,0.0016888924,0.0007304442,0.002627892,0.00051414175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97527426,0.007070635,0.006819272,0.0010131941,0.007491498,0.0023312212],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029800793,0.00043123995,0.00097628153,0.025998514,0.001400889,0.0057448624,0.0008940068,0.00064468145,0.0059679723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020521438,0.00019816021,0.000536418,0.07085091,0.000417246,0.0017348322,0.0023601537,0.0005341725,0.002571121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036741773,0.00015191916,0.7276445,0.004533527,0.0003035329,0.0011039465,0.0030017893,0.0004796928,0.00072822854,0.0017910944,0.061969448,0.19792497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001740875,0.00009733752,0.81113917,0.0013244367,0.0003667336,0.001904093,0.007258588,0.00053483783,0.002004639,0.0005795258,0.17470086,0.00007239327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009026257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00691604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97400147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025648787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005975405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019964874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160439135","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.20056497","title":"Contribution of Jadavpur University in S&T as reflected in WoS Database during 2006-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Audience measurement; Originality; Scientometrics; Web of science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Impact factor","score_opus":0.31346249781955576,"score_gpt":0.4623814696548963,"score_spread":0.14891897183534053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160439135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71532685,0.056567974,0.00065219717,0.006410527,0.0009012024,0.00022151388,0.1821616,0.00053616,0.037222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556528,0.046580408,0.0017083833,0.00067636685,0.0008677226,0.00028262768,0.084336795,0.00012776915,0.009767072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323833,0.00066041434,0.0018874294,0.00083277054,0.0028216413,0.0005593727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744373,0.007360195,0.00716404,0.0010938586,0.0075630625,0.0023815066],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003036901,0.00047660831,0.0010879294,0.030289553,0.0013863153,0.0061125355,0.0009343169,0.0006832021,0.0065678633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021028416,0.00020787357,0.0005695674,0.08479822,0.00041817574,0.001783371,0.002481035,0.00054587884,0.003108769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004254839,0.00016049854,0.69227755,0.005470149,0.00036828322,0.0010894133,0.002918097,0.0005021345,0.00081928336,0.0019253051,0.074687116,0.21935664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019906814,0.00009828445,0.7933704,0.0014148622,0.00041157092,0.0020089657,0.0065196506,0.00052019453,0.002096338,0.0005862263,0.1928764,0.00007703848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008199896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058832467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96971047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002588916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061351196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021971703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161797083","doi":"10.82308/22708","title":"Assessing open access scholarly communication practices of early- and mid-career researchers in Canada: A mixed-methods study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scientific communication; Access to information; Free access","score_opus":0.9093161321931008,"score_gpt":0.7535494070572639,"score_spread":0.1557667251358369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161797083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872435,0.0027686327,0.001527429,0.0020360912,0.000053052572,0.0015023866,0.00064802414,0.000021969252,0.0041989502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822322,0.0024749457,0.005930652,0.0016713805,0.000032468448,0.002937965,0.00043012743,0.000023639665,0.004266658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757962,0.008214006,0.002392734,0.0022966226,0.007811872,0.0034884515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92887884,0.028852783,0.010278049,0.002768766,0.02425574,0.004965897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03426626,0.00047159247,0.0017935837,0.0043101017,0.012837531,0.009180031,0.0033342137,0.0018735674,0.003541623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06319173,0.00083424046,0.0010373361,0.0087165125,0.0041111475,0.0033955714,0.0048613558,0.0016480719,0.000369112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006033128,0.00074387336,0.30042422,0.002925955,0.00030780456,0.00046120386,0.6073241,0.00013676901,0.0011575893,0.0027462698,0.002213543,0.080955304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001179962,0.00055225997,0.37762994,0.0027952243,0.0003298283,0.0001460524,0.5949235,0.0005930854,0.0010527193,0.0009664806,0.020687563,0.00020534107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8791826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93703276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052408412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15485168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3802514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165401262","doi":"10.70550/sebi.v1i3.73","title":"Fighting Predatory Journals: A Strategic Solution for the Quality and Sustainability of Scientific Publications in Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Reputation; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Qualitative research; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.5523710859871966,"score_gpt":0.546888739866304,"score_spread":0.0054823461208926005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165401262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7292738,0.010329727,0.01453135,0.091059245,0.00083832594,0.00037538164,0.0001245641,0.00028249703,0.15318516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838187,0.002005941,0.004584038,0.0023021137,0.00011505953,0.000058461563,0.00002811857,0.000026719596,0.0070609096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462175,0.002345319,0.0005413244,0.00046876728,0.0014968629,0.0005259599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792656,0.0067712166,0.006476229,0.00082356983,0.002563989,0.0040994235],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056239683,0.00022967154,0.000279146,0.0014706776,0.0050116847,0.01330497,0.0013089273,0.0020360684,0.0030536838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117539745,0.00028595192,0.00028299564,0.0019481287,0.003705385,0.0054474426,0.0052342713,0.0016721166,0.00081672595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030362047,0.00082627655,0.20480564,0.004414575,0.00021012832,0.014642255,0.1479294,0.0014929466,0.01352858,0.10701945,0.031864062,0.4729631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012414649,0.0006425843,0.14886612,0.0032211945,0.00029602295,0.0087290425,0.22664371,0.005285772,0.009391497,0.10356482,0.49290887,0.0003261884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017349933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029966873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030717726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013617473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029742718},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W796014025","doi":"10.11575/prism/34787","title":"Open access: the way of the future?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.29783590337593074,"score_gpt":0.45802852380740444,"score_spread":0.1601926204314737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W796014025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030574987,0.17050214,0.0154604325,0.6851861,0.010579678,0.000041113177,0.00013284513,0.0001476138,0.114892565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22889344,0.45954692,0.021286303,0.14666784,0.040582325,0.0002807971,0.0002939054,0.00041998512,0.10202848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908942,0.0037779287,0.00058447395,0.00064242457,0.0031144351,0.0009864926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763765,0.014707448,0.0011540458,0.0016710823,0.0038235516,0.0022673905],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011331391,0.00040691177,0.0008599545,0.002238493,0.005187409,0.026909953,0.001504286,0.007883805,0.01862439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025260286,0.00033501204,0.0005934567,0.004830902,0.017300906,0.06348985,0.005846703,0.012057528,0.0027849942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027777363,0.000028087376,0.00037881528,0.00051305786,0.000009852076,0.00013602799,0.0016386082,0.00008801064,0.00024129628,0.8741908,0.049033176,0.07371447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058459873,0.000030694417,0.0006442668,0.0010204689,0.000008562296,0.00040461315,0.004042308,0.00018015025,0.0001969161,0.3051687,0.68826014,0.0000374062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004046782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006065664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00293861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005636446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062304795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W817928363","doi":"","title":"The Economics Of Science (book Review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Economic science; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.24644309672473477,"score_gpt":0.45023561754363667,"score_spread":0.2037925208189019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W817928363","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012721938,0.9621376,0.00031412742,0.007258907,0.012086427,0.00003406611,0.00038779885,0.000056806453,0.017597023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012420506,0.95424473,0.0005309943,0.0065885526,0.00926946,0.000047469435,0.00058274914,0.000038561877,0.027455471],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999014,0.000116304145,0.00007312943,0.000093093375,0.0006451601,0.000058303198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610776,0.001769806,0.00036042012,0.0000919546,0.001449612,0.00022044587],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090190076,0.00078089716,0.001552926,0.004437463,0.0005109249,0.002999039,0.0011989914,0.0019869239,0.047569524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006969176,0.00039548337,0.00077692163,0.009341079,0.00063656544,0.0022482825,0.0009924647,0.0021218613,0.031390924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017964525,0.000017402386,0.00006845673,0.004207177,0.00003757256,0.00004657391,0.000021084297,0.00009658091,0.00009088559,0.0019331715,0.7835173,0.20994581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009645407,0.000012078568,0.00042195412,0.0025194674,0.00003342635,0.00019101342,0.000015458818,0.000019670626,0.000037156457,0.0015470545,0.99518484,0.000008226717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035181972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073785093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99556255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014661374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036221482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15913588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844775728","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/6ypuw","title":"An end to ‘God-like’ scientific knowledge? How non-anonymous referees and open review alter meanings for scientific knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Anonymity; Openness to experience; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Secrecy; Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6936453776104983,"score_gpt":0.6171817199298439,"score_spread":0.07646365768065433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W844775728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102889895,0.016402083,0.18059789,0.4249407,0.008206008,0.0003251036,0.00018729083,0.0005248885,0.26592624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484496,0.002855809,0.017543301,0.01632539,0.0027003237,0.00027778206,0.000052690277,0.0002744775,0.011520591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.76464534,0.17127463,0.007476834,0.01512902,0.03692152,0.0045526954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5294994,0.33197266,0.040227555,0.050416376,0.03777441,0.010109645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1433164,0.00062877056,0.0014501764,0.004349038,0.014551407,0.040820245,0.003165076,0.0098351855,0.0047708144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32113808,0.0009390506,0.0011552761,0.0042914753,0.11005661,0.04241452,0.019459931,0.011796662,0.0014572518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136088,0.000024447087,0.0012964905,0.00022796984,0.000043249,0.00023179181,0.1091812,0.00015370568,0.00042935304,0.86856323,0.0041997842,0.015587471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053842483,0.000065762644,0.0008873327,0.00052281615,0.000053289845,0.00032791795,0.027206097,0.00034071517,0.0006506307,0.85168326,0.11808469,0.0001236421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002252846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019261764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99565095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010295028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016127704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W967451186","doi":"","title":"La fonction de conseil en science et technologie. Le cas du Québec.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12577357349968615,"score_gpt":0.44656355968869005,"score_spread":0.3207899861890039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W967451186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6101749,0.0525305,0.0026025025,0.037320554,0.0006470765,0.00005446751,0.017328532,0.00029716382,0.27904436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93826795,0.0041650273,0.0006784032,0.00045177044,0.000053280804,0.000020225621,0.001230127,0.00005578245,0.055077493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982486,0.00037614375,0.00006247784,0.00018506718,0.0006142059,0.0005136164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946234,0.0011824399,0.0005267021,0.00011606054,0.0028113911,0.000740002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012758133,0.00043895474,0.0004527317,0.003180064,0.0025855163,0.00474592,0.00076788705,0.0008535998,0.016714638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006142937,0.0002481416,0.0005161136,0.007719308,0.0014309612,0.00154119,0.0009837688,0.0015443475,0.0011301328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036631347,0.00017297467,0.57216436,0.0003487727,0.00041698187,0.0020287712,0.008489965,0.0033218167,0.0011277935,0.12004688,0.08366454,0.20785077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028508255,0.00002955275,0.8103732,0.0003644605,0.00016688922,0.0003985571,0.006542601,0.00297608,0.00040471152,0.0021993327,0.17645775,0.000058379555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99279284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99515015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99741447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046135128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025971606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33473533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}