{"meta":{"query_hash":"267f88c801b7","filters":{"topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research"},"cohort_total":2100,"direct_labels_cover":193,"predictions_cover":2100,"exported":2100,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/267f88c801b7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=scientometrics+and+bibliometrics+research"},"results":[{"id":"W1480055427","doi":"10.18438/b87592","title":"Does a Social Network Based Model of Journal Metrics Improve Ranking?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Computer science; Centrality; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Digital library; Social network (sociolinguistics); World Wide Web; Social network analysis; Library science; Impact factor; Information retrieval; Social media; Data science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21554354072907722,"score_gpt":0.47162825250861146,"score_spread":0.25608471177953424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480055427","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018370964,0.0008992411,0.9308282,0.040799912,0.001048505,0.000411949,0.00004256178,0.00004970535,0.0075489567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218441,0.0007708085,0.05423036,0.02255138,0.0003152203,0.0000043916734,0.000006961286,0.000009474368,0.0002672784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.991779,0.00038915424,0.0014461315,0.00024394123,0.0056560417,0.00048570347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97000873,0.02578719,0.001602736,0.00033813663,0.0019142611,0.00034892606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041780896,0.00014272158,0.0002644896,0.019104842,0.0005515401,0.0037318578,0.0011363894,0.00015303981,0.0002876112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08051301,0.00008259457,0.00013468007,0.06502793,0.00014998319,0.1722952,0.00029243113,0.00050979166,0.000024181138],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039237975,0.00033822923,0.028124914,0.00015716336,0.00006330698,0.000021524334,0.0006238854,0.026324153,0.0006312989,0.12546042,0.041999295,0.772332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001221291,0.00038985215,0.013436385,0.000081107544,0.00003705501,0.000010535562,0.0009873795,0.7146523,0.004571778,0.0071508097,0.25714853,0.00031300017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030980586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.555819e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90347314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028274997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007706764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480669717","doi":"10.18438/b8kp4f","title":"Peer Review of the Evidence Base","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Base (topology); Computer science; Peer review; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Information retrieval; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5430162852185466,"score_gpt":0.5381562733337029,"score_spread":0.004860011884843751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480669717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021863787,0.05961436,0.0038768852,0.9081736,0.0006379681,0.0006688042,0.00002810189,0.000035539957,0.024778357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3717496,0.13064706,0.015851324,0.46830243,0.00020106051,0.000066114706,0.000020081752,0.000018615843,0.01314369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869473,0.0009894185,0.000953826,0.00022644954,0.01067299,0.0002100304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549852,0.032928906,0.0014195248,0.0013961433,0.008740425,0.0005297735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045256216,0.00010252616,0.00019392151,0.004663305,0.00014516008,0.0017243756,0.0017545985,0.000058824113,0.00065710745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.62542033,0.00005622644,0.000085587206,0.056276873,0.00015661176,0.25909927,0.00073015376,0.00026435195,0.00023714466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021700308,0.00006442921,0.012506528,0.0006818701,0.000008309263,0.000002858763,0.0001764387,0.000086376975,0.000029199828,0.038738787,0.839933,0.10755523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001516435,0.00012337968,0.012225208,0.0024074265,0.000013470828,0.000014208903,0.00039231824,0.0032226047,0.0011066776,0.00045718715,0.9797925,0.00009340363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009741837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.6166064e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58016413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001735226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010152956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993119},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1488788462","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Metrics under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reputation; Audit; Documentation; Library science; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Mathematics; Accounting; Business","score_opus":0.6638953583953724,"score_gpt":0.5733188140237518,"score_spread":0.09057654437162055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488788462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6304858,0.0066863033,0.0022717626,0.33938354,0.0003021449,0.00033667748,0.000035582034,0.0000051247594,0.020493083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200195,0.00078288134,0.00064055395,0.0058581643,0.00015819813,0.000003040696,0.0000062435242,0.0000039761894,0.0005449857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920554,0.0017267272,0.00075246155,0.00014729415,0.004896035,0.00042204245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736465,0.019438736,0.00055864727,0.00033856375,0.0043199505,0.0016975583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06336895,0.00008136334,0.0001718208,0.03449224,0.0011577796,0.016623976,0.001469234,0.00011731566,0.00009858706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106013454,0.00004051841,0.00006061346,0.10541618,0.0003008348,0.04249504,0.0002607655,0.0014402965,0.00008372542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071734306,0.000043328586,0.22343339,0.000015706357,0.0009416488,0.000047142807,0.042422075,0.0029424923,0.00009173308,0.12029958,0.39858356,0.21046199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003565802,0.00021645334,0.09925648,0.000013039944,0.000076437296,0.000038352107,0.06608954,0.0024158098,0.00015620174,0.013987589,0.8172839,0.00010959015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001517922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023802108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41870037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000675764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022345185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843969},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1491754772","doi":"10.1002/asi.23101","title":"Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":445,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Joint Information Systems Committee; Arts and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social media; Citation; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Altmetrics; Information retrieval; Biomedicine; Data science; World Wide Web; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.12889260177510845,"score_gpt":0.4927783923111769,"score_spread":0.3638857905360685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491754772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97862256,0.00007814929,0.000603269,0.02018272,0.00014139296,0.00017142958,0.00001651347,0.0000024140095,0.00018154862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992505,0.000044692086,0.0004643942,0.00020442925,0.000012377233,0.000004410112,0.0000019126544,6.4402207e-7,0.000016651065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949644,0.00007746754,0.0007900994,0.00009108204,0.0038956332,0.00018127699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869044,0.0019940226,0.0012555395,0.00020526261,0.0077845035,0.00007025468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033348102,0.000045550532,0.00019072492,0.051103722,0.00026151887,0.00093853474,0.0012882538,0.00010248194,0.0000047549856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07127955,0.000020655503,0.000052050284,0.17976266,0.000411178,0.0029821922,0.00014271007,0.00019174763,0.0000011451542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922002,0.00007856977,0.8382709,0.000007743907,0.00006281858,2.2560653e-7,0.005794044,0.000041589738,0.0024728521,0.012747504,0.0032522788,0.13726453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041360004,0.00020089558,0.9530074,0.000011944217,0.000040231662,0.000009612829,0.00904419,0.016640017,0.00020239172,0.014712615,0.005673133,0.00004398989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014352023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062630165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13722055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090978494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016452823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492479987","doi":"10.18438/b8qw4r","title":"Doctoral Students in New Zealand Have Low Awareness of Institutional Repository Existence, but Positive Attitudes Toward Open Access Publication of Their Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nonprobability sampling; Axial coding; Psychology; Medical education; Grounded theory; Qualitative research; Sociology; Theoretical sampling; Medicine; Social science; Population","score_opus":0.4246772706305319,"score_gpt":0.5396775239440464,"score_spread":0.11500025331351454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492479987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98116946,0.0010723934,0.0023652192,0.008931393,0.00035999398,0.0007358727,0.00005285033,0.000014820067,0.005298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574023,0.0003303934,0.001599136,0.0016802644,0.000043107288,0.00001662929,0.000035375702,0.0000030839517,0.0005517495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951322,0.00044749313,0.0010599834,0.00023380677,0.0028575417,0.0002689711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907431,0.006270385,0.0011325867,0.00041322398,0.0011553586,0.00028535107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008617136,0.00011826196,0.00025637253,0.008750183,0.00016285204,0.0052117044,0.0028304348,0.00009186247,0.00015465044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018067634,0.000085802574,0.000046599795,0.027367214,0.00016992478,0.34710884,0.0017727024,0.00019321544,0.000012700822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004707638,0.00022792244,0.9782438,0.000031466567,0.000011528942,9.785374e-7,0.00040368515,0.000093466915,0.000042946893,0.0063459533,0.0015716781,0.012555807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004571986,0.000087643624,0.9789389,0.00023391664,0.0000055368364,0.0000066608504,0.0004524986,0.0003961612,0.0065903696,0.00013161269,0.012594426,0.00010511894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.0536227e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34189713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036811856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012189937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496074027","doi":"10.3171/2014.12.jns142553","title":"The academic productivity and impact of the University of Toronto Neurosurgery Program as assessed by manuscripts published and their number of citations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Proxy (statistics); Citation; Scopus; Productivity; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Library science; Index (typography); MEDLINE; Science Citation Index; Demography; Medical education; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.326309038289192,"score_gpt":0.49016570291335165,"score_spread":0.16385666462415965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496074027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961464,0.0013273356,0.00002287857,0.0013621565,0.0006031406,0.00018233777,0.00003449762,0.0000031052698,0.00031815632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988102,0.0008471286,0.00002485331,0.000015431706,0.00003059609,3.9055726e-7,2.6589356e-7,0.0000065452327,0.00026462894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949318,0.000762717,0.0008266708,0.00025277317,0.0029647339,0.00026129704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98658097,0.0076517025,0.0016565927,0.00046402367,0.0033299946,0.00031671952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016394656,0.000119813696,0.00044638687,0.0023524356,0.00016340565,0.0003654847,0.001012091,0.00008165348,0.00002596861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053207614,0.00005745404,0.0002798829,0.01768138,0.00061136653,0.0014614057,0.0004028716,0.00038472097,4.537519e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014544878,0.0002190932,0.9028523,0.000008103201,0.000031620282,0.0000043771274,0.00020264319,0.000008118026,0.01378196,0.000021086324,0.05769834,0.025026906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027275868,0.00024642074,0.99008197,0.000015501833,0.000011688934,0.00009389215,0.00050888956,0.00014214966,0.0012171502,0.0011750506,0.0061749397,0.00005956637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032704129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017701619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087229684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058369744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000579994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95476764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496956611","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a24","title":"A Survey of Scholarly Journals Using Open Journal Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Open source software; Publishing; Open source; Computer science; Open-source software development; World Wide Web; Sample (material); Political science; Software; Internet privacy; Library science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.9052581429497064,"score_gpt":0.6965406886885522,"score_spread":0.20871745426115418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496956611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794955,0.0143656945,0.0008082774,0.0013537935,0.0003841213,0.00048042551,0.000035179513,0.00000506305,0.0030719284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929074,0.0034735254,0.0029158178,0.000018599862,0.00005570619,0.000006962259,0.0000037275167,0.000012629829,0.0006056092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683597,0.011578412,0.0016053454,0.0005630978,0.017082192,0.0008112332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197867,0.013806452,0.00075022667,0.002565576,0.062179733,0.0009113114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.433576,0.00011957022,0.00040198455,0.033645753,0.0025584884,0.10988756,0.012105621,0.00027894785,0.0002355656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3023365,0.00008194177,0.000070587375,0.08484101,0.0007203755,0.019998282,0.005994099,0.005729906,0.000046154186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013119723,0.00036120575,0.7971197,0.000013907744,0.00005794618,0.000008108411,0.0004949608,0.00002580916,0.070744775,0.004240541,0.004941639,0.12186024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007371,0.00020111765,0.9658162,0.00009110665,0.0000041862013,0.000119267366,0.0011209829,0.006252105,0.0005849045,0.013931412,0.0109903,0.00015129155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052532554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051497703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16869655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000952301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011967681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497278741","doi":"","title":"Investissements du Canada en science et innovation : le concept actuel de la recherche et developpement est-il suffisant?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7236746860763056,"score_gpt":0.6128067089039004,"score_spread":0.11086797717240515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497278741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.655528,0.0015855627,0.039175447,0.18667974,0.0015131392,0.0005974854,0.000115488096,0.000046949826,0.11475816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8660951,0.0015026183,0.096819036,0.008877518,0.000115766845,0.000018957799,0.000010634826,0.000018884355,0.02654146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813024,0.00316804,0.0012764933,0.0012278624,0.011441124,0.0015840976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965966,0.02589431,0.00040931278,0.00078831485,0.006032132,0.0009099381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14217888,0.00030249087,0.00033083878,0.027886465,0.00061693735,0.00423822,0.0033896042,0.00034758027,0.0017893659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20750219,0.0002548871,0.000051994622,0.29155284,0.0012515186,0.002363467,0.0015284234,0.001061689,0.00015303456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011337007,0.00043458425,0.02854972,0.000010196766,0.00002409523,0.000033845023,0.0021464138,0.00065534527,0.0047830255,0.16998617,0.16982159,0.6235437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009288747,0.00013638295,0.09981598,0.000037955127,0.000007146675,0.00004444834,0.0024381236,0.017327536,0.029226827,0.0095646735,0.83998656,0.0004854865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36579686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22020324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.670165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048547145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057958115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497360613","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.244854","title":"Citation Patterns in the Finance Literature","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Business; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.21028003995618805,"score_gpt":0.49709138484603327,"score_spread":0.2868113448898452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497360613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824599,0.008463626,0.0018762535,0.0038462728,0.00013683162,0.00010750682,0.000006235853,0.0000044386,0.0030989037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677394,0.026802331,0.00003595403,0.00024286986,0.00015003169,0.000004080491,0.0000022070349,0.0000050269023,0.005018116],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923798,0.00043803873,0.00044331505,0.0003033547,0.0045790337,0.0018564656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977136,0.0011081657,0.00012146932,0.00035109042,0.0006420236,0.000063599946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038718987,0.000098241486,0.00013276289,0.015070952,0.00024919372,0.0026046757,0.002127695,0.00007499231,0.00029807212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034411426,0.000051513598,0.00011373408,0.108117774,0.000034958062,0.0006966431,0.000040719257,0.002085509,0.00023339508],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026974936,0.000083804196,0.035565194,9.208802e-7,0.0000065735244,0.000031912365,0.00091992115,0.00012130861,0.0000180458,0.018408244,0.0013562241,0.9434609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065221044,0.000345998,0.23933566,0.000032696742,0.0000026062332,0.0005736751,0.002106536,0.0012959662,0.000015806,0.7308818,0.024601776,0.00015525294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031480195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003334711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003121926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067253795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500384936","doi":"10.18438/b83g6s","title":"Level 1 COUNTER Compliant Vendor Statistics are a Reliable Measure of Journal Usage","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Vendor; Electronic journal; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Computer science; Chemistry; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.42501520806941745,"score_gpt":0.4965367225650929,"score_spread":0.07152151449567545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500384936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019025927,0.003209137,0.92901826,0.031108953,0.0010385257,0.00052168965,0.00046200596,0.000040985873,0.01557452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87180364,0.0027675394,0.10173122,0.022332696,0.00014004514,0.000004519414,0.0000216062,0.000012728206,0.0011860146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930559,0.00024604797,0.0011555197,0.00017774156,0.0050420566,0.00032273104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97884375,0.016634617,0.0014175766,0.00036445528,0.0023861981,0.00035341282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0258732,0.00011037079,0.00021344167,0.010954661,0.00029395256,0.0030262468,0.00086413627,0.00008098573,0.0008092303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078275464,0.00007874506,0.000051073475,0.025588755,0.00013019454,0.14710663,0.00022017006,0.0004026911,0.00013161455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029896807,0.00041329867,0.11543295,0.0002347303,0.00006719979,0.00015340708,0.00065459864,0.00068822905,0.0004993009,0.0835675,0.3931112,0.4021879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058917253,0.00030556586,0.19660385,0.0002142188,0.000014668977,0.00011145622,0.0018274148,0.008576479,0.0017812831,0.0008654205,0.78895116,0.00015929245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006954833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.16947156e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8527777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024250521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044203564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500417170","doi":"10.1002/bult.2014.1720400310","title":"ASIS&amp;T annual meeting pre‐conference activities: Full room for the third SIG/MET workshop","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation; Scientometrics; Context (archaeology); Session (web analytics); Webometrics; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.1441817719441936,"score_gpt":0.4341499481024922,"score_spread":0.2899681761582986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500417170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6071571,0.00037800742,0.16922572,0.18427506,0.0026742204,0.0052570715,0.00057949894,0.00025317067,0.030200163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942154,0.000046553894,0.0028102172,0.0003856136,0.00003764191,0.00011762249,0.0000023421958,0.0000037617951,0.0023807979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943494,0.000081204154,0.00073263317,0.000292245,0.004053481,0.00049101695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779,0.011511188,0.0014753402,0.00068714935,0.00834647,0.000079813675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040687405,0.00011258083,0.00023734887,0.008250629,0.001244891,0.0012319498,0.002897473,0.00020368877,0.00002238601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21614504,0.000062272185,0.00010247174,0.033541035,0.0005300724,0.0008718109,0.0007744836,0.0002020609,0.000026085681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010809199,0.00007766397,0.025572238,0.000036571848,0.000047941114,1.3271936e-8,0.0025570157,0.00042359196,0.0014546142,0.13481982,0.17322178,0.66168064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047893426,0.00015120441,0.006035709,0.000016981166,0.00001157392,0.0000016363783,0.0039695175,0.007256904,0.002332658,0.014711336,0.9649132,0.0001203323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025683019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020200348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015247075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026727995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501080678","doi":"","title":"Impact of Publishers’ Policy on Electronic Thesis and Dissertation (ETD) Distribution Options within the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Texas at El Paso; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Health Science Center, University of Tennessee; Rhodes University; University of the Sciences; Universidad del Atlántico; College of Computing; Marquette University; University of Toledo; Hawai'i Pacific University; University of South Alabama; University of Oregon; Pepperdine University; Kent State University; University of Southern Maine; Old Dominion University; Nova Southeastern University; University of West Florida; University of the Pacific; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Northwestern University; Northern Arizona University; University of North Texas; New Mexico State University; University of Miami; Oregon State University; University of Texas at Arlington; University of South Carolina; Florida Atlantic University; Indiana Wesleyan University; Georgia State University; Montana State University; University of Notre Dame; Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; University of Wyoming; Georgetown University; University of Southern California; University of Oklahoma; Morgan State University; University of Texas at San Antonio; Portland State University; University of West Georgia; University of Pittsburgh; Florida State University; Indiana State University; North Carolina State University; University of Washington; Iowa State University; Villanova University; University of Northern Colorado; Oklahoma State University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Georgia Institute of Technology; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; University of South Dakota; North Dakota State University; Georgia Southern University; Directorate for Biological Sciences; University of South Florida; Florida International University; Utah State University; Michigan Technological University; Vanderbilt University; Purdue University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; York University; George Mason University; University of Southern Mississippi","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Business; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0584179079290481,"score_gpt":0.3823540805339383,"score_spread":0.3239361726048902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501080678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693902,0.000091355854,0.0008976653,0.0027343712,0.00021919563,0.00033209648,0.00024886228,0.000038367747,0.02604789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696183,0.00093544734,0.000093423056,0.00046195602,0.000119869415,0.000011790712,0.0012909288,0.0000068857944,0.00011787571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724466,0.00019634613,0.00069294556,0.00021390562,0.0011994826,0.0004526569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717826,0.001370064,0.00044834765,0.00039143607,0.0003652397,0.00024665525],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002828914,0.00016224646,0.00018826796,0.006180794,0.0003888644,0.0031222766,0.0006388055,0.00012655291,0.00019492798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016709336,0.000090282854,0.00010065183,0.033150747,0.00018100829,0.011643898,0.00020679753,0.00046415246,0.00001615076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021792241,0.00010484416,0.040015426,0.000010375824,0.000053132422,2.5691264e-7,0.0006386489,0.0034302021,0.000033113665,0.8925745,0.012220147,0.050701454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084263214,0.00051787455,0.7709212,0.00002874251,0.000009824587,0.000010936877,0.0001805278,0.08622249,0.00016366117,0.02709204,0.1137556,0.0002544776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066372463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049108157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86548245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023499864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000216846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509195019","doi":"10.18438/b8cs37","title":"Use Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science for Comprehensive Citation Tracking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Web of science; Citation analysis; Sample size determination; Impact factor; Stratified sampling; Sample (material); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Statistics; Meta-analysis; Physics; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.4677110181043493,"score_gpt":0.525365212743652,"score_spread":0.057654194639302714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509195019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233342,0.0018673448,0.06034179,0.010598306,0.00043452295,0.00087229855,0.000050754214,0.000057064044,0.002443716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95576036,0.00089704106,0.03798314,0.0052650194,0.000023151684,0.0000055393007,0.000006137425,0.0000037865395,0.000055797183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536735,0.00015091186,0.0007921114,0.00028749165,0.00310052,0.0003016052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602139,0.035526976,0.00072974025,0.00031754983,0.0029231724,0.00028869067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022394674,0.000095200434,0.00015751002,0.020212311,0.0005521228,0.0052722897,0.0005930414,0.00006548722,0.00003615024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15759839,0.0000748753,0.000036288635,0.04993368,0.00050482404,0.38044506,0.0002454033,0.00020257574,0.0000117078525],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015799291,0.00013362755,0.048025202,0.0001998253,0.000015870333,0.000003824692,0.00075982686,0.00028346607,0.020082235,0.2132217,0.003419471,0.712275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000843455,0.00056006573,0.4646359,0.00017716001,0.00001604919,0.000021747868,0.003914071,0.058581732,0.037218176,0.0008608623,0.4329351,0.00023565789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006258673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.752622e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71203935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016929192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005895555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509207465","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.476","title":"A Matter of Discipline: Open Access, the Humanities, and Art History","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Digital humanities; Humanism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Political science; Social science; Art; History; Law","score_opus":0.57150650394932,"score_gpt":0.571475474680813,"score_spread":0.000031029268507065666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509207465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8913064,0.005711312,0.000019271502,0.018890496,0.007951391,0.00016209872,0.000014989825,8.825129e-7,0.07594314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87030625,0.000014588066,0.00014028708,0.0013279987,0.00022643832,0.0000025584225,0.0000010170886,0.000004827921,0.12797603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981682,0.00007053901,0.00040782557,0.00012722402,0.0010522165,0.00017399483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680924,0.0004773665,0.00039110138,0.00032269442,0.0017181374,0.00028145447],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045712995,0.000054122127,0.00013420238,0.011655496,0.00017101056,0.0027594971,0.0030547343,0.000040232084,0.009707081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013613877,0.000031136184,0.000040538427,0.009037271,0.0003294224,0.0011553047,0.00019035027,0.000259157,0.000051734274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002113114,0.000015531545,0.207015,0.0000015300104,0.0000037556142,9.2730176e-7,0.00020224054,2.9362383e-7,0.00008586508,0.0014152179,0.7862312,0.0050263163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000435681,0.000011778346,0.44108525,0.0000034277994,0.0000027029496,0.00001071595,0.000070823924,0.0000013599921,0.000011888934,0.002783756,0.55595136,0.000023385193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004521584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009928355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23407026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014826967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005307708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510487290","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10031937","title":"Long-Term Patterns in the Aging of the Scientific Literature, 1900–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Phenomenon; Scientific literature; Term (time); Period (music); Demography; History; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Biology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.43267262378551335,"score_gpt":0.5565941038788597,"score_spread":0.1239214800933463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510487290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859545,0.00088193547,0.0032606614,0.0009031038,0.0010115656,0.00025995672,0.000013229179,0.0000063674556,0.0077086748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432284,0.00002063303,0.00007732881,0.00027005738,0.00004931183,0.0000021870653,0.0000016256295,0.0000042047436,0.0052518332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98856056,0.00025256505,0.00067549024,0.0005268176,0.009397578,0.0005870159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362975,0.0033819915,0.00018436724,0.0013446021,0.0013406165,0.00011868026],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05621345,0.000103668135,0.0001597237,0.033728227,0.00029436778,0.00400054,0.0047938656,0.00006894456,0.0003187565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00839455,0.000040796254,0.00016242224,0.27323452,0.00029348265,0.0004058052,0.00066072744,0.0003411116,0.00006197069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034445209,0.00008862594,0.9476371,0.000004621758,0.0000019358242,0.000016740203,0.0006711652,0.0000044074445,0.00046009873,0.00080930913,0.0023292468,0.047973335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016752722,0.000018608493,0.9928061,0.000027245198,0.0000012019275,0.000009224293,0.0003799405,0.00013194403,0.0030277492,0.001663088,0.0017033309,0.00006406506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000784809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005259051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23950629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048651997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000967083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512796984","doi":"10.3386/w19538","title":"Credit History: The Changing Nature of Scientific Credit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Credit history; Financial system; Economics","score_opus":0.8350192033811803,"score_gpt":0.655006246116735,"score_spread":0.18001295726444533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512796984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025136068,0.017880214,0.000020600066,0.00331674,0.014060185,0.0015400057,0.00054988544,0.000018078823,0.93747824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870156,0.0013537788,0.00018395652,0.000028360908,0.0025147572,0.00011854752,0.00021434543,0.000048830905,0.20852181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485989,0.000765838,0.0021016402,0.0015921192,0.045711696,0.0012297827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91531616,0.022193115,0.0017209986,0.0020670812,0.058280576,0.0004220654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18654469,0.00029457232,0.0009086872,0.1301556,0.00055561896,0.0016025141,0.0083942795,0.0009730884,0.009049967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14057167,0.00019116951,0.00056229846,0.05863528,0.0024911615,0.0006949688,0.002439512,0.0026718667,0.0010481775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015380243,0.00008178352,0.001026341,0.000049278628,0.000076778255,0.0000021922597,0.00010026005,0.00005341293,0.00017894097,0.04074187,0.94981927,0.007854497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023957234,0.00011760816,0.0028724053,0.00006441548,0.000008749487,0.000013338496,0.00027661835,0.0028165898,0.00042825736,0.14527133,0.8476715,0.00021961053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010447889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007106694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76187956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050271275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018511457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513702849","doi":"10.18438/b8rc71","title":"The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Government (linguistics); Library science; Citation; Citation analysis; Health care; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4657287888165873,"score_gpt":0.5367322101662652,"score_spread":0.07100342134967785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513702849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0889018,0.002818472,0.00024380842,0.8851753,0.00014009686,0.000574203,0.000113719,0.000013336187,0.022019261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96528304,0.009331184,0.0011521393,0.02326398,0.000040784817,0.000016078013,0.000014559002,0.00000526046,0.00089295907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944986,0.0017373887,0.0010539567,0.0002786474,0.006966635,0.0005135127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710608,0.02651303,0.0006368926,0.000567384,0.0007562255,0.00046567083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044483565,0.000100673926,0.00017751704,0.0085802255,0.0009954805,0.0034368413,0.00080465386,0.00007215366,0.00011599279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036130413,0.000064554435,0.000034533165,0.03354771,0.00028413,0.052938122,0.00032477436,0.00035807677,0.000013923812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046632267,0.000119321005,0.088658184,0.0001378419,0.000030865078,0.0000049433997,0.0007445874,0.000076666,0.00006253324,0.5407162,0.19800642,0.17097616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025219482,0.00015767617,0.23248507,0.000035899084,0.0000017847187,0.0000021086628,0.0027744728,0.00078077376,0.00018604769,0.0022967667,0.76094747,0.00007972103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024952352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023297744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8763813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011579511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012221778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516312676","doi":"","title":"Highly Cited Canada Articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Library science; Index (typography); Web of science; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Institution; Multidisciplinary approach; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.400457680858481,"score_gpt":0.5049024716013509,"score_spread":0.10444479074286994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516312676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663247,0.00022598392,0.00041095944,0.0012904062,0.00056822057,0.0001919362,0.00004392327,0.000014719063,0.030929176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.000011438743,0.00012477794,0.0004967713,0.00006211941,0.0000107166015,0.0000022299234,0.000006033837,0.00029481587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761279,0.00016494906,0.00071583904,0.0012112252,0.019898016,0.00188204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98648196,0.00089145557,0.00023704038,0.0006218688,0.00813454,0.0036331532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04286531,0.00017225067,0.00037241547,0.81387734,0.001205565,0.005289014,0.005154308,0.00009476436,0.000118654796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06894001,0.00014747972,0.00008727541,0.9800926,0.002038422,0.0023288259,0.00043075345,0.0002764648,0.000058621274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004637906,0.000021143534,0.9184352,7.215703e-7,0.0000060973457,0.000045728706,0.00061818806,0.00010210048,0.00028697783,0.00096083444,0.0025475991,0.07697078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029091546,0.00002890092,0.9761351,0.0000020584848,0.00000784815,0.0000014058211,0.004569602,0.012481585,0.0002782971,0.0017782804,0.0041935234,0.00023252679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9391933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97974277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16621524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005950873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030951861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978651},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1516388499","doi":"10.1108/02640470710729083","title":"Federal Science eLibrary Pilot","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Originality; Alliance; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3907233330194798,"score_gpt":0.5276591830770152,"score_spread":0.1369358500575354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516388499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638259,0.0033333788,0.0023353898,0.008959292,0.00063067226,0.0003559456,0.0000055675555,0.00018464279,0.22036923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828894,0.00017878688,0.00026488642,0.0018017269,0.00031510598,0.000004497092,0.0000021311796,0.000020946529,0.01452251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878342,0.00016834312,0.00061478984,0.00078895595,0.008537134,0.0020565565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374807,0.0039421953,0.00017486859,0.0012955026,0.00034029823,0.0004990431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030464344,0.00017323717,0.00021106504,0.023300437,0.0011339325,0.005014094,0.007781673,0.000054035463,0.002214999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004568093,0.000091803806,0.00011578985,0.2018258,0.0009480509,0.0047368854,0.0018271069,0.00064331706,0.001047939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034063193,0.0003400355,0.066261776,0.000003471551,0.000026262329,0.0000430396,0.0002328356,0.00001584764,0.011366555,0.51058173,0.14149967,0.26928815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068561785,0.0010104446,0.18921314,0.000005666075,0.000003951162,0.00006725947,0.00033683822,0.0015471376,0.052293245,0.50131476,0.25309992,0.00042199832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017306242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004046911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26886615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115668496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00179232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516942684","doi":"","title":"Quantity versus Quality: What’s in a (Journal) Name?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Statistics; Quality (philosophy); Rank (graph theory); Bathtub; Econometrics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Geography; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.7144364333315639,"score_gpt":0.5995644660464967,"score_spread":0.11487196728506721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516942684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032222,0.002626539,0.000016960428,0.00093439233,0.0055736164,0.0008486132,0.000048034013,0.000022694943,0.08670697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88243115,0.112786345,0.00084983243,0.00007576823,0.0003294604,0.0001008262,0.000012985126,0.000062675084,0.003350952],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800425,0.00326808,0.0032500846,0.002605363,0.008392935,0.0024409937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717331,0.018692752,0.0011004197,0.0037755168,0.0034417142,0.0012565224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1380443,0.0004794061,0.0014230632,0.10128734,0.00036704188,0.010547091,0.008779661,0.0010213644,0.0012999076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101456136,0.0004205886,0.00058567466,0.040640045,0.00081105385,0.001581256,0.008394294,0.00666503,0.00035410875],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057838595,0.0004979117,0.07935419,0.00004109147,0.00006282514,0.00021905241,0.0007636025,0.00087720755,0.000019682877,0.0013907705,0.0005345795,0.9156607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010323079,0.0015128902,0.5373627,0.0009946844,0.000019137722,0.00008343066,0.02861093,0.020009538,0.00030451815,0.21243837,0.1850435,0.003297247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013139059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004705981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91236347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00301064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031997785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520949446","doi":"10.18438/b8z327","title":"Google Scholar Retrieves Twice as Many Relevant Citations as PubMed and Provides Greater Full-Text Access for Quick, Clinical Nephrology Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Citation; Medicine; Recall; Information retrieval; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.381617408746652,"score_gpt":0.5226569759167576,"score_spread":0.14103956717010563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520949446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71383923,0.0012105961,0.024989324,0.25201082,0.00052152824,0.0019729442,0.00004745375,0.000114454575,0.005293648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079927,0.0039845686,0.016412241,0.06989173,0.00023316905,0.00025190448,0.000036359015,0.000018641658,0.0011786408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933872,0.0015855238,0.0013304616,0.0006075481,0.0025232232,0.00056601816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92486984,0.07103581,0.0009804711,0.0007270349,0.0016135036,0.00077333226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03529921,0.00019428715,0.0003344316,0.009821593,0.0007600612,0.01110309,0.0013208832,0.00023867247,0.0003085887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35525313,0.000140957,0.00009857039,0.021274509,0.00039973503,0.22989984,0.00077303965,0.0006163763,0.00026419683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006239957,0.00023756838,0.077153094,0.00024270508,0.000082626735,0.000008138648,0.00057396636,0.00006859006,0.00015065809,0.14831808,0.056753926,0.7101707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008483974,0.001119477,0.19170113,0.00004488708,0.00002741833,0.00004088378,0.00071084354,0.016480187,0.0005530868,0.0064095915,0.7818438,0.0002203197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022544831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.3432402e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72508985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001829928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005559815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521319765","doi":"10.1108/00012530910989607","title":"Institutional repositories in Canadian post‐secondary institutions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; World Wide Web; Computer science; Originality; Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Interface (matter); Value (mathematics); User interface; Heading (navigation); Knowledge organization; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.35822892393573014,"score_gpt":0.5153858212926363,"score_spread":0.1571568973569062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521319765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7411547,0.00035796195,0.00003287419,0.007258455,0.00054437865,0.00017944668,0.00002383362,0.000032458796,0.2504159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968365,0.000033673576,0.0005619035,0.0010113644,0.00014486069,0.000008685108,0.0000066353136,0.0000041302605,0.001392272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460554,0.000014827873,0.00058159063,0.0006022735,0.003404689,0.00079104886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590766,0.00023177807,0.000108671746,0.00021983635,0.0027306548,0.00080140546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061658174,0.00013670449,0.00021055104,0.04300865,0.0005657127,0.0022916486,0.001481221,0.00014515426,0.0002395291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020795457,0.000109334964,0.000080362086,0.09823056,0.00019736789,0.0019687521,0.00013496213,0.0004031845,0.0002744565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031617692,0.00019118108,0.4229145,0.0000068168706,0.000008594204,0.00013321593,0.000914722,0.00002241199,0.0027689748,0.4169685,0.04241956,0.1136199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025199258,0.0001180768,0.6765642,0.000011038169,0.0000014714552,0.00005086652,0.00029995886,0.00023210724,0.00050597946,0.01381943,0.30798504,0.00015980165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043203212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024897005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40314907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005064984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032303436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521812281","doi":"","title":"Writing for Conferences: A Handbook for Graduate Students and Faculty by Leo Mallette and Clare Berger (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6982719281394875,"score_gpt":0.571062810058546,"score_spread":0.12720911808094149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521812281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8499354,0.095600516,0.018384952,0.033479176,0.00049862324,0.0015119625,0.00022782564,0.000012093699,0.000349464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299033,0.024826769,0.031490315,0.009110917,0.000673601,0.00016052905,0.00003790074,0.000053227537,0.0037434157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903795,0.00018600035,0.0013367707,0.0004670516,0.0070854165,0.00054524804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751902,0.00458317,0.0011669509,0.00025074664,0.018046573,0.00076232787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04429987,0.00017469675,0.00055556296,0.008774709,0.00046775877,0.11278483,0.0022927842,0.00015892531,0.0000763408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10459084,0.00011108267,0.00018614512,0.011311751,0.0000972816,0.045705114,0.00058412936,0.0009134754,0.0000048315787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020344885,0.00005749533,0.13906476,0.0000868203,0.000058503254,0.0000027479553,0.000110123656,3.4697078e-7,0.0009776967,0.00008522338,0.71171045,0.14782546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007887064,0.0015963713,0.39388508,0.0024277233,0.00015202015,0.00020552694,0.0050617745,0.0015347899,0.00050936214,0.024887772,0.5609695,0.0008830121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005567766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004313962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25482032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006246897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018502315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522204259","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a106","title":"China’s Scientific Journals in a Transforming Period: Present Situation and Developing Strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Scientific publishing; Period (music); Digital transformation; Public relations; Business; Regional science; Sociology","score_opus":0.6500827458347428,"score_gpt":0.6006074012232214,"score_spread":0.049475344611521366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522204259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663162,0.010046082,0.0014512809,0.019286782,0.000050436487,0.00059879204,0.0000022873542,0.000010068864,0.0022380664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933077,0.003975599,0.0021212604,0.000013619075,0.000017985038,0.00006084694,0.000004336782,0.0000062115882,0.0004924222],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027836,0.0016779164,0.0006228032,0.0005105429,0.006334034,0.0005763443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918444,0.0018288249,0.0001120423,0.0008195291,0.005098134,0.00029706323],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07451928,0.000100755125,0.00018645368,0.02864596,0.0018919379,0.04709366,0.0017281679,0.0001235242,0.00014914552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017885996,0.00007236858,0.000031959087,0.04921687,0.00067785673,0.011441813,0.0010172047,0.0011812263,0.00005944569],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023680597,0.00012455025,0.045817055,0.000030815772,0.0000116685005,0.0000039069946,0.011187093,0.000027993317,0.020832488,0.013943169,0.0008629614,0.9071346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034910138,0.000062075094,0.8586844,0.00007787893,9.223329e-7,0.000010549811,0.010664014,0.0057134316,0.00049006316,0.120552756,0.0032801637,0.00011461827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012974116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042389255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012771998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004740762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523857352","doi":"10.1126/science.315.5820.1779a","title":"Canadian Institutes Get Windfall Without the Bother of Competition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Windfall gain; Economics; Business; Biology; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.40063954595579027,"score_gpt":0.5529326283435347,"score_spread":0.15229308238774447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523857352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251307,0.00020925747,0.00487195,0.0016286188,0.0006403691,0.00017693655,0.000014232904,0.000008768926,0.06731913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976513,0.0000121094,0.00079562544,0.0003129932,0.000040236173,0.0000011134565,3.0608885e-7,0.0000027474828,0.0011835683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915394,0.000047334877,0.00036887836,0.0004078793,0.007004067,0.0006323922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955849,0.0010451842,0.00013964975,0.0006747867,0.0020554692,0.0005000157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04530746,0.0000701765,0.00012155366,0.028027928,0.0005676887,0.0009509184,0.0035892678,0.000038411617,0.0004766104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013837626,0.00003751801,0.00004758436,0.14989118,0.0015698045,0.0006216868,0.00026241172,0.00013499804,0.00030216182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010904357,0.00005958723,0.81283617,0.0000022903973,0.0000037616228,0.000010358209,0.0006346048,0.00009766092,0.013188089,0.042288125,0.0019208954,0.12894756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013756956,0.00006466968,0.87833303,0.000007063265,0.0000014087747,0.000008389369,0.00064898795,0.0014351055,0.009021794,0.008500476,0.10173412,0.00010739363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021316055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067783296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12884015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001869381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013031706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524539223","doi":"10.1684/vir.2013.0478","title":"A map of science based on the articles submission flows.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.5654763445074102,"score_gpt":0.48755798796527317,"score_spread":0.07791835654213708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524539223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97702014,0.00006114145,0.00052598165,0.012381488,0.00033285827,0.000704223,0.0000041982535,0.000014003407,0.008955951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779093,0.000002770896,0.00023215172,0.00034489928,0.000025012188,0.00026153235,1.5061282e-7,0.000004063267,0.0013384584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890074,0.000144723,0.00039016976,0.00043426346,0.009392563,0.0006308796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164146,0.0045493282,0.00015352228,0.0009586918,0.0022518449,0.00044514195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028414667,0.000079997095,0.000139244,0.023076989,0.00030806876,0.0015015955,0.0028019738,0.000036089063,0.0014166109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04510864,0.000036719965,0.00008231486,0.104763456,0.000757997,0.00045799447,0.00037487497,0.00013032756,0.00078645884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014896759,0.00017424223,0.03586867,0.0000028092727,0.000002213745,0.0000012102264,0.000055082157,0.00010859557,0.0030068643,0.0013390202,0.034825604,0.9246008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017334592,0.00003894038,0.8888584,0.000002473039,0.0000011470086,3.398834e-7,0.0001652641,0.071937084,0.024416478,0.008470837,0.0058624307,0.00007329324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079740545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002317833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059615017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013736264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525080406","doi":"","title":"A bibliometric analysis of the Canadian Journal of Communication and Communication's Methodological Evolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Razón y Palabra","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific communication; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.622874245565931,"score_gpt":0.5731120051965494,"score_spread":0.049762240369381594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525080406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763457,0.009376743,0.0072612963,0.0039133816,0.0000849195,0.00014536972,0.000022072367,0.0000038631697,0.0028466254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921806,0.0005946233,0.0069827545,0.00009641696,0.000008692014,9.0331986e-7,0.0000020807843,0.000002312953,0.00013163751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934685,0.0017308008,0.00087999075,0.00020481567,0.0034524952,0.00026335052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98568094,0.0073882863,0.0008500575,0.0013601945,0.0043867687,0.00033375935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038847767,0.00008782051,0.00043385185,0.5372124,0.00050010596,0.00086602854,0.0032751379,0.00013417371,0.0002109627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06532798,0.00004967866,0.00025489196,0.8619227,0.0004485669,0.00038685583,0.00026631166,0.00035212905,0.0000044039275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001157951,0.00007654457,0.8711676,0.0000013997352,0.00011937216,9.611155e-7,0.00027598641,0.00036553649,0.00042995956,0.009675969,0.002806077,0.11506902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017310868,0.000076598495,0.9744496,0.000006644336,0.000089880064,0.000006187634,0.00015977456,0.004145007,0.00009893614,0.018740151,0.0019998243,0.00005429076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054608327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008294227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32471028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000152302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000504966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525626892","doi":"10.18438/b8j02g","title":"Awareness of Open Access Issues Differs among Faculty at Institutions of Different Sizes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Liberal arts education; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Public relations; Medicine; Higher education; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5269235616537716,"score_gpt":0.5847103699454687,"score_spread":0.05778680829169702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525626892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591928,0.00029428603,0.009923256,0.01939093,0.00023219963,0.0005055511,0.00009280822,0.000024794952,0.010343374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958552,0.00093081285,0.0010147754,0.0017787035,0.000016597116,0.00001759847,0.000037016904,0.00000326388,0.00034603925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539876,0.0004561032,0.0009372784,0.00025157037,0.0027583928,0.00019789656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98503816,0.0121622225,0.0010919502,0.0005742067,0.0009051594,0.00022829324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005291851,0.00012320383,0.00032256325,0.008287898,0.00028772093,0.0045951577,0.003091083,0.00007682741,0.00060053926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06282455,0.00008040835,0.00006450146,0.025490524,0.00030504746,0.28881037,0.0028411967,0.00013714464,0.000023458942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041100505,0.00018368168,0.86642694,0.00012558987,0.00002211969,6.7914874e-7,0.00021096517,0.00063494744,0.00021353994,0.086845815,0.009728261,0.035196465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004197932,0.00017748494,0.8160404,0.00012970377,0.000013341061,0.0000012749185,0.00032182844,0.01403526,0.017739581,0.00077793945,0.15021376,0.00012965094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011797506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.0034065e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2842152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016725264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025497898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99643815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529017456","doi":"10.22230/src.2010v1n2a25","title":"The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in Computer Science and Engineering","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Scholarly communication; Computer science; Scientific communication; Engineering ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Science communication; Science and engineering; Library science; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Science education","score_opus":0.35025389298133985,"score_gpt":0.5242150292590216,"score_spread":0.17396113627768178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529017456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867782,0.00097242463,0.000062536696,0.010423101,0.00005145769,0.0005272258,0.0000018262854,0.0000080586005,0.00117515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976862,0.0015206926,0.0006615172,0.000024482024,0.000012465915,0.00004766493,5.330504e-7,0.00000537339,0.000041065043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899109,0.001055472,0.0004740002,0.00042940807,0.0076375953,0.00049260305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635069,0.024602858,0.00015642378,0.0017774315,0.00974752,0.00020889755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20663676,0.00009858558,0.00015824783,0.009160933,0.002201658,0.018622225,0.0057407315,0.0001059752,0.000008785825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14533672,0.000048095422,0.000024698946,0.04241594,0.0025701579,0.0042281942,0.0029337122,0.0029995628,0.0000120819695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001568946,0.000107155334,0.2255517,0.000029359479,0.000013290969,6.3210103e-7,0.0022407079,0.000010614064,0.09384022,0.17045845,0.0009287772,0.5066622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006853501,0.00074098795,0.8903005,0.00013827239,0.0000025424752,0.0000077837785,0.0007406114,0.070414305,0.013222237,0.016913543,0.0066724867,0.00016135818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001406878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000712443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66474885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006283765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018971483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529286388","doi":"","title":"Ottawa University’s Research Retreat","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NASPA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.8929882446635876,"score_gpt":0.6565624647328274,"score_spread":0.2364257799307602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529286388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578139,0.0026555767,0.003556711,0.008100021,0.0019737566,0.00017745481,0.00001587305,0.00002955679,0.42567718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943095,0.00043704567,0.0014108871,0.000052630963,0.00044176585,2.2757268e-7,6.824666e-7,0.000009525656,0.054552227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97785807,0.0012649214,0.00043072674,0.00043150093,0.019190846,0.000823944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97762376,0.0036683378,0.00017558207,0.0006346396,0.016129024,0.0017686277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09703056,0.000097247925,0.00021308856,0.0857438,0.0006813804,0.0037981307,0.0035704288,0.00013313566,0.00094587944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08341518,0.000066136505,0.00014244487,0.22797333,0.00025824137,0.0010464553,0.0007618499,0.0012069724,0.002671928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051994277,0.00008473501,0.07193513,6.856399e-7,0.000011201705,0.0009752234,0.00028657407,0.0000292782,0.00008912374,0.0021296327,0.83969724,0.08470917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010352349,0.00041311776,0.023183243,0.000012317392,0.0000026382197,0.00059089303,0.0036634167,0.0008097658,0.00018637397,0.026771752,0.94319785,0.00013339096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000860942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036143858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38528112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057545205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530517025","doi":"10.1002/asi.23027","title":"The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Webometrics; Bibliographic coupling; Knowledge base; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Front (military); Web of science; Data science; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Information science; Period (music); Network analysis; Citation; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Physics","score_opus":0.23216091820544282,"score_gpt":0.5205154533318411,"score_spread":0.2883545351263983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530517025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861547,0.0002085948,0.0069395,0.005485698,0.0003723175,0.0002899472,0.000016734704,0.000007701477,0.0005248531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987474,0.00036140077,0.00077875156,0.000034933728,0.00001584554,0.0000057996085,6.8049945e-7,0.0000012611599,0.000053909174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172753,0.00011710211,0.0010565193,0.0001626187,0.00651302,0.00042322828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625207,0.0038041514,0.0019463864,0.0003855405,0.03114583,0.00019737221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1563829,0.00007295605,0.00022294626,0.12054029,0.0021830841,0.0031942758,0.0017116831,0.00012036723,0.0000017579562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13574907,0.000039200524,0.00006032514,0.23789826,0.0018951222,0.010067176,0.0004871218,0.00030500896,0.0000024875164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006565619,0.00006275449,0.5927094,0.00002207323,0.000074126576,3.99706e-8,0.003422791,0.00042001903,0.0033864866,0.07882194,0.0029771514,0.31803754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007305701,0.00050586375,0.6841904,0.000014837546,0.000052664476,0.000006887899,0.006948883,0.25581768,0.0021835314,0.03082073,0.018618667,0.000109289715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023647923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000313437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31792825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019152842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005925051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911594},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1531725100","doi":"10.7202/038710ar","title":"La production des revues économiques francophones","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5022795717072314,"score_gpt":0.5064498026908933,"score_spread":0.004170230983661982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531725100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91229177,0.025214516,0.0032356128,0.025714194,0.006175502,0.00062748586,0.000064731204,0.00013459094,0.026541581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916455,0.01708671,0.009344876,0.0010965759,0.0015274512,0.000028859538,0.000008167224,0.00003432082,0.05441808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928884,0.0017875076,0.0014434804,0.0016123106,0.0010130862,0.0012552266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053717,0.004817374,0.0005115908,0.0013345854,0.0019597902,0.0008395062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024872841,0.0004886474,0.0008397573,0.021926852,0.0006237861,0.004189993,0.0021817985,0.00071046595,0.0020508096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036616627,0.0004333314,0.0004180891,0.05058014,0.0011275505,0.0029950677,0.00035178804,0.000964751,0.0019778938],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007933669,0.00046120372,0.008038356,0.000046430865,0.00004105011,0.00003337347,0.002215933,0.00009014786,0.0010662987,0.023330262,0.040509287,0.9240883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041442883,0.00056567317,0.05915806,0.00015543902,0.000019800516,0.0001242322,0.0013326616,0.00093441526,0.013859482,0.32484922,0.5979669,0.0006197184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079975725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017496278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006445444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006642562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533022716","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/3dq5j","title":"How pre-publication journal peer review (re)produces ignorance at scientific and medical journals: a case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts; University of Chicago; Princeton University","keywords":"Ignorance; Judgement; Construct (python library); Originality; Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7933235383128203,"score_gpt":0.6568485479612578,"score_spread":0.13647499035156252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533022716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57729524,0.19280674,0.002646779,0.21365935,0.006130567,0.0027511285,0.00010428511,0.000052231095,0.0045536645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.837889,0.032742206,0.00068251614,0.00042236526,0.00077702594,0.00008403655,0.000014653144,0.000029082146,0.12735912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9263271,0.0019622985,0.0021248139,0.0027812575,0.06581735,0.0009872004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094297,0.0044150795,0.0038704972,0.0054583214,0.07377525,0.003051139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33419165,0.00045443964,0.001216001,0.048996337,0.0039994773,0.10456625,0.0092076305,0.00042997306,0.003970328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55906224,0.00026586468,0.0003832673,0.051976167,0.00090365444,0.0021451043,0.011058554,0.002551769,0.00013504231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036285,0.00039487408,0.040404662,0.00013996063,0.00006455058,0.0017014549,0.00041024643,0.0000014092514,0.000007842243,0.000011121491,0.61154217,0.3453113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021970305,0.0006084049,0.07521317,0.0028974907,0.00025431556,0.030318849,0.0050336523,0.0061226124,0.000081518745,0.008881268,0.86666095,0.001730757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021546397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059893646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34358057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002957291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001948831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1538407099","doi":"10.3386/w18494","title":"Words in Patents: Research Inputs and the Value of Innovativeness in Invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.9425202320059478,"score_gpt":0.7325894461411707,"score_spread":0.2099307858647771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538407099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59042436,0.007605378,0.000023251247,0.003604895,0.0010490617,0.0025130014,0.0001708614,0.000004812301,0.39460438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992448,0.0043581096,0.00006884166,0.0000086790815,0.00021528792,0.00014708258,0.000049952676,0.000020838846,0.002683246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9483548,0.0064468672,0.00400657,0.0014493262,0.038225193,0.0015172713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93135476,0.039699003,0.000948097,0.000931953,0.026839547,0.00022663276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43038914,0.00020467603,0.0009858214,0.14737931,0.00016733754,0.00053071824,0.0031290129,0.0005467808,0.0003884862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15206462,0.0001385693,0.00016337313,0.10979933,0.0023889139,0.0006543927,0.0023455045,0.0023547213,0.00007210232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061868964,0.0006414369,0.430227,0.00026213547,0.00009145846,0.000008230368,0.000652407,0.00041374896,0.00017925116,0.5047835,0.014901134,0.047220986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020462363,0.000119351185,0.22572953,0.00024553438,0.0000022445015,0.000006627248,0.00043855645,0.0028582166,0.00022770307,0.7610607,0.0071005654,0.00016472625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009664278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000830144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4020236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024743963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006588662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541016824","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1531","title":"Open access scholarly publications as OER","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Open education; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Scholarship; Prestige; Higher education; World Wide Web; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8106962675610487,"score_gpt":0.7187572455364282,"score_spread":0.09193902202462056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541016824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19610642,0.026852217,0.00088342145,0.3250764,0.00028654086,0.0053045787,0.00013300536,0.00001895595,0.44533846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95376706,0.033015974,0.00020506729,0.00080770405,0.0000385884,0.00037688843,0.000082227016,0.000008612485,0.011697849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98943746,0.001365381,0.00082904525,0.0005687917,0.0073602297,0.00043912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973912,0.011365148,0.00043466713,0.00099836,0.012891076,0.0003987693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07698375,0.00009286298,0.00030326712,0.008678396,0.00042818213,0.041676395,0.024775226,0.000049593935,0.008286414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18858251,0.000053095722,0.000057929847,0.062403828,0.00030716133,0.0083459355,0.022047551,0.0009921013,0.00071954564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034425386,0.00025348435,0.40938628,0.00011887752,0.000036488575,0.000004877104,0.000052467574,0.00002243885,0.00010014191,0.060562648,0.22298293,0.30644494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053481275,0.000085575084,0.3046109,0.0011036539,0.0000022885552,0.000011493588,0.0011890226,0.0018186294,0.000064042026,0.060653955,0.6298112,0.000114403556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005401629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002945889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001377949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006222225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99262017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543356285","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02673.x","title":"Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner &amp; Resh (2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Freshwater Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Impartiality; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.7403374696315432,"score_gpt":0.5473373932863184,"score_spread":0.19300007634522487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543356285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791834,0.00010136803,0.00015562521,0.016973209,0.00027765028,0.00054657366,0.0002724007,0.000024134077,0.0024656826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932133,0.00001707243,0.00084019394,0.0007333787,0.00006625517,0.00018317894,0.000019428495,0.000015081037,0.0049121235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925395,0.0026344575,0.00058390014,0.001178347,0.0020865044,0.0009772715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826605,0.006924799,0.00014146866,0.0013283902,0.0029629618,0.00037631113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025114262,0.00017660648,0.0002938255,0.027101867,0.00020232255,0.0006173391,0.003296471,0.0002667834,0.005395463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07506945,0.000094352254,0.00007828427,0.043811776,0.0005121417,0.0002862739,0.0007108542,0.00056915527,0.0030401684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003931993,0.00048490107,0.8546728,0.0000018428194,0.000045779623,0.000024513696,0.038610216,0.0000059935655,0.012906003,0.003404071,0.07942508,0.006486799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000424944,0.00081109203,0.8765885,0.000004441708,0.0000017409253,0.0000012931068,0.0033470183,0.00006145242,0.0024514063,0.032187756,0.08393691,0.00018342672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034537476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005980538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049955186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002220348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027212026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544049225","doi":"10.18438/b8bk60","title":"Evidence-Based Scholarly Communication Conference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.4744856647683098,"score_gpt":0.5059136533603361,"score_spread":0.031427988592026335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544049225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030405726,0.015124486,0.08871608,0.8302021,0.00033842353,0.0010395901,0.000032357522,0.00027734184,0.033863865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88832086,0.007877039,0.017653244,0.08571928,0.0000359974,0.000015265117,0.000020493027,0.0000046046534,0.00035322423],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193174,0.0012382698,0.0010474761,0.0003879067,0.0050208964,0.00037369164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654264,0.029481724,0.00087868306,0.0012786594,0.002481182,0.00045338718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01917726,0.00018017678,0.00022959367,0.013410463,0.0005772613,0.022700088,0.002373107,0.0001542317,0.0012758278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17656931,0.00013866501,0.00008096302,0.04542721,0.00016718675,0.61834186,0.0003184937,0.00060871546,0.0005846624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079734705,0.00017286162,0.007999773,0.000031053332,0.000008571332,0.0000063823777,0.00018684794,0.00048021218,0.00039726702,0.23807131,0.0269522,0.7248962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074376486,0.000886749,0.18178618,0.00076348445,0.000021968985,0.000015927197,0.0008240403,0.08793378,0.0041548437,0.005596425,0.71684206,0.00043076676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010762259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.3314795e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8579151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033701457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009177826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544279692","doi":"10.1108/09504121211195315","title":"PubMed Central Canada: A Free Archive of Life Science Journals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.7979500745042533,"score_gpt":0.5696406225725056,"score_spread":0.22830945193174768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544279692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.678691,0.22878675,0.005183626,0.0020592522,0.0032362859,0.0021678614,0.000351661,0.000023481693,0.079500064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97824985,0.019082732,0.0017835484,0.00022288573,0.00017888099,0.000031028932,0.0000012719939,0.000006282803,0.0004435405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98456615,0.00048553836,0.0015064954,0.0005123747,0.011067478,0.0018619484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810166,0.0027119345,0.0012111112,0.002027206,0.0024703373,0.0034777771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055623703,0.00016724563,0.0007223033,0.016498221,0.00024646436,0.00067602633,0.0055138576,0.000051435076,0.0008390434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20071557,0.00009727735,0.00014878993,0.11378089,0.00042254743,0.0010968592,0.0011103221,0.00035007164,0.00010841712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080031305,0.00010348066,0.33736333,0.00002668901,0.000007497943,0.0000015137152,0.000102135666,0.0000020017746,0.0007102865,0.0025866593,0.082409166,0.5766792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011797759,0.000018746838,0.6048473,0.00002991683,0.000004346174,0.000004853281,0.000060699156,0.000066113025,0.00030931568,0.0010049783,0.39342186,0.00011385476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030451812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02184688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033922784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037140895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548026587","doi":"10.1002/asi.23601","title":"Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The <scp>MELIBEA</scp> score","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Predictive power; Directory; Actuarial science; Statistics; Predictive value; Medicine; Business; Operations management; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Internal medicine; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.42461814870500303,"score_gpt":0.5635768202144353,"score_spread":0.1389586715094323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548026587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96968716,0.000116772746,0.009725184,0.011468366,0.0020800342,0.000835326,0.000017864699,0.00001647126,0.0060528107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983561,0.000018919074,0.0010105093,0.00031323015,0.00004446426,0.000014652524,3.6455353e-7,0.0000023712562,0.00023935526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287057,0.00012897144,0.0007601713,0.00014400914,0.005765649,0.00033060723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748499,0.0041272603,0.0024384514,0.00038981042,0.018046973,0.00014761362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09250395,0.00007643444,0.00021900146,0.014009266,0.000892889,0.009429511,0.008269386,0.000104578976,0.0000016406358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30449393,0.000035275414,0.00006198808,0.08246396,0.00034330742,0.011940669,0.0027323118,0.00028413063,0.000018118151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025236426,0.0000633416,0.64549726,0.00001521089,0.000050714032,6.274145e-7,0.0013594563,0.0015095498,0.00052448537,0.03114374,0.07349189,0.24631847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027231693,0.00048588924,0.340808,0.0000614954,0.000033661145,0.00009134025,0.004570941,0.03674734,0.007523899,0.30089307,0.30595687,0.000104325714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010843432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029655434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30468926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043778837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010431588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548708099","doi":"10.18438/b88w4q","title":"While Collaboration Is Increasing in the Profession the LIS Dissertation Remains a Solo-Authored Monograph","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Accreditation; Library science; Curriculum; Psychology; Internship; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Medicine; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.31097552685322943,"score_gpt":0.4992871824586893,"score_spread":0.18831165560545987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548708099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7026279,0.0010433061,0.005144501,0.27213383,0.0003837205,0.0015302969,0.000022859538,0.0000662384,0.017047357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747153,0.00091068435,0.002741298,0.0214408,0.0000271608,0.00005458579,0.000015565498,0.000003895242,0.00009072118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421793,0.0018630998,0.00075156725,0.00023915918,0.002684246,0.00024397118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98276716,0.015203967,0.00065923156,0.00054665306,0.0007148046,0.00010814984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021965694,0.0001120819,0.0001189674,0.007677354,0.0006041077,0.0038837644,0.0010686789,0.000096008065,0.00026625607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046530787,0.000056419947,0.000042796688,0.06616482,0.00010020109,0.17785268,0.0001675786,0.00032941857,0.00006492705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047918507,0.0006429449,0.26817292,0.0001125907,0.000033598124,0.00001889811,0.086568214,0.00010287581,0.00053259573,0.3118332,0.059949383,0.26724094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004904588,0.00034256562,0.6988386,0.00016511018,0.00001900772,0.000017203662,0.07155941,0.038523775,0.0020678383,0.0033598442,0.18439026,0.0002259439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046964993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017904388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43066567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013013494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029032282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551860406","doi":"","title":"Carpe Diem - Shall We Make Earth Science First Among the Sciences in Canada? GAC Presidential Address - Annual Meeting Vancouver, British Columbia 26 May 2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geoscience Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential address; Presidential system; Library science; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Public administration; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11719277175373706,"score_gpt":0.37805421985695914,"score_spread":0.2608614481032221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551860406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819958,0.0013000801,0.00005465121,0.0006041296,0.0057656798,0.00068931334,0.0003269192,0.000022129538,0.009241269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98981863,0.00018318121,0.0003014441,0.00053256546,0.00006350206,0.000037815607,6.722796e-7,0.000017108501,0.009045071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706746,0.0004779997,0.00118098,0.0021692326,0.022616293,0.002880925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99035484,0.003219549,0.00051812094,0.0011843152,0.0036464487,0.0010767496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030307626,0.00028877376,0.00049531076,0.00591338,0.0046114777,0.010011568,0.0089757135,0.00008748755,0.00075441203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06442387,0.00026890266,0.00007594578,0.21061394,0.0037579206,0.0018869984,0.0012596636,0.0005942517,0.000009364414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027201015,0.000035032175,0.7732099,0.00000730198,0.0000032092294,0.00026098435,0.0001358027,0.0014740421,0.000033886306,0.0000757798,0.21356927,0.01119203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003676224,0.00007053448,0.80466187,0.00007398579,0.000004933133,0.00004478889,0.0064299935,0.006771722,0.00019412939,0.00024720078,0.18059349,0.0005397141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99986345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20470056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018508253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058046307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552151481","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.243","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Scientific literature; Population; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6998329989555784,"score_gpt":0.5995986486184482,"score_spread":0.10023435033713013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552151481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77623767,0.021708148,0.001111153,0.19515951,0.004054624,0.00038959674,0.000014732823,0.00000650167,0.0013180616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939455,0.0008215667,0.0013832172,0.00072788773,0.00051541126,0.000009886398,7.5438794e-7,0.00001396604,0.0025818038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662529,0.00039714974,0.002495611,0.00047035457,0.029522467,0.00086147647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8111122,0.023346748,0.004363467,0.0017607431,0.15767346,0.001743361],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38872263,0.00013629074,0.0004296056,0.032798532,0.0011119348,0.30514517,0.008307007,0.0001656855,0.00015872146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74587154,0.00007006731,0.00033519062,0.116925426,0.00024908484,0.07965872,0.00039433318,0.003415064,0.000020326972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005498628,0.00019413266,0.16561064,0.00004751804,0.000022727485,0.000026160404,0.00046142298,0.000023948622,0.0074348766,0.0013159406,0.3168453,0.50796235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011739326,0.00016499756,0.12123152,0.0003842189,0.000018040688,0.00021607743,0.0017189747,0.00083689153,0.0011451012,0.10938505,0.7635184,0.00020681636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009980567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012192586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5077555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091287584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008616889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553659993","doi":"10.18438/b8dw26","title":"A Content Analysis of Google Scholar: Coverage Varies by Discipline and by Database","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; PsycINFO; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; English language; Database; Content analysis; MEDLINE; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.27126809770882476,"score_gpt":0.48585904676943675,"score_spread":0.214590949060612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553659993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56897646,0.013873224,0.3617436,0.0453106,0.00022746982,0.00066626753,0.0018610684,0.00006301137,0.0072783255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759755,0.00606312,0.004939522,0.011948255,0.000015101544,0.0000057173306,0.00030100727,0.0000048621246,0.000746924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533904,0.00025953777,0.0009446547,0.00028268382,0.0029232672,0.0002508112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786748,0.019158633,0.0007310037,0.0004520234,0.00064146024,0.00034204757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018843958,0.000113575785,0.00026314936,0.014159701,0.00027645257,0.003126667,0.00057433307,0.000069718255,0.00045634352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061602104,0.000081273545,0.000058267953,0.06164296,0.00017074142,0.211569,0.00047243875,0.0002567977,0.000017743825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036284218,0.0008453321,0.30754378,0.00018568535,0.0006171904,0.000019896888,0.0010086498,0.0002508062,0.010061679,0.08820075,0.175429,0.41220883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006693262,0.0002940108,0.11443194,0.000044344124,0.00015793067,0.000005185111,0.0018197933,0.024269842,0.009253317,0.00013965275,0.84868944,0.00022521468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003503107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.0984399e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67326045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000112576245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115298186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556404523","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1735064","title":"Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure and the Public-Private Portfolio","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Patent portfolio; Adverse selection; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.3594921832956024,"score_gpt":0.4745913030827797,"score_spread":0.1150991197871773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556404523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377674,0.020821583,0.02260574,0.0022755018,0.0016617571,0.0003205022,0.0000037054183,0.000038579426,0.014505261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817966,0.004376736,0.00012729222,0.00002815298,0.00021752197,0.0000067426677,7.743355e-7,0.0000153138,0.013430856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019897,0.0006332372,0.00074937433,0.00066157844,0.0043319436,0.0034248817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432546,0.0012099821,0.00043257166,0.00054266903,0.0030124218,0.0004769039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.107967965,0.0001879702,0.00029694062,0.026456662,0.0023118043,0.006876628,0.0026398676,0.00010077895,0.00040622882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015859159,0.00009648332,0.00021170505,0.115656145,0.0008362206,0.0013465584,0.00061901903,0.00206988,0.00021419521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065281056,0.00010433738,0.1843889,0.0000017052672,0.000080560014,0.000004014652,0.000549926,6.776674e-7,0.00008658006,0.69554025,0.0028259452,0.116351806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013410598,0.00019902029,0.025712738,0.000007965777,0.000018765511,0.0013843054,0.0021371967,0.0010024834,0.000103192026,0.9318831,0.035999537,0.00021062342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002845714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047406164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23634285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005023355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026477962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155739840","doi":"10.7202/1029237ar","title":"La valorisation de la recherche : savoir investir dans le savoir","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7534352182341003,"score_gpt":0.5969145407895278,"score_spread":0.15652067744457254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155739840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44704187,0.02945991,0.18641312,0.02620725,0.0023915782,0.00084321556,0.0001391475,0.00025387466,0.30725005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8408151,0.031553246,0.059124485,0.002061931,0.00047216978,0.000103338316,0.000085459396,0.00008777931,0.06569647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97263795,0.017564569,0.001121014,0.0010292359,0.0066996566,0.00094755227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94414383,0.050604228,0.0005183216,0.0007560389,0.0027123431,0.0012652343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11866581,0.0003651482,0.00043772816,0.08823355,0.00034215732,0.031076824,0.0017461578,0.0008941141,0.0021057078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14947723,0.00033765426,0.00020847608,0.24477011,0.0011248173,0.015760299,0.00055322604,0.0013115649,0.0007956336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012348469,0.0010160507,0.08610949,0.00006575757,0.00011569595,0.00009973114,0.027460434,0.0010950725,0.006574264,0.13369748,0.47891837,0.26472417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020661238,0.00043398264,0.03288657,0.00011702409,0.00004305542,0.00009477826,0.015939878,0.006236318,0.010872888,0.42313048,0.5075844,0.0005944847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067357854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025613728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39377326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027286215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064070825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558261592","doi":"10.18438/b8d90k","title":"Perception and Information Behaviour of Institutional Repository End-Users Provides Valuable Insight for Future Development","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Phone; Medical education; Coding (social sciences); Psychology; The arts; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.17137841858777303,"score_gpt":0.4294235495464267,"score_spread":0.25804513095865367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558261592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086134,0.0034269488,0.053671338,0.021268988,0.001550629,0.0018963532,0.00007974437,0.000093326475,0.009399265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612786,0.00087040995,0.033515707,0.00395298,0.00010955935,0.00006227495,0.00007447286,0.000003425378,0.00013254721],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963688,0.0001774428,0.00086689816,0.00014308727,0.0022075446,0.00023618795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460053,0.0033175736,0.0006780626,0.00021787346,0.00094388594,0.00024205989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007300193,0.0001124928,0.00014474918,0.007039468,0.0005088078,0.0016689745,0.00033309034,0.000112948626,0.00011834539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012532535,0.00008429027,0.000038911858,0.009208408,0.0001158533,0.39521077,0.00019612839,0.00014945291,0.000025426052],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009998445,0.0002311051,0.18070911,0.000392783,0.000031215342,7.8117756e-7,0.0057764077,0.00024947897,0.00044459646,0.094359614,0.006921712,0.70988333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033967162,0.00012681958,0.36201352,0.000049653692,0.000012352212,0.000020792722,0.0031700514,0.0033704746,0.0025372843,0.00004124695,0.62819827,0.000119879645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007049175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.3264697e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70976347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037879065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006285015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558953815","doi":"","title":"Before and After: OA in Developing Countries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hispana","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Poverty; Political science; Economic growth; Publishing; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.29895197940568186,"score_gpt":0.5168096986519236,"score_spread":0.21785771924624175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558953815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98960817,0.0011128571,0.004370553,0.0019527022,0.00021507505,0.000094728,0.0000048702677,0.000011106361,0.0026299362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967115,0.00019606462,0.0017088137,0.0004969734,0.00003502138,0.0000030958884,5.51655e-7,0.000004758134,0.0008432383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955529,0.000037016012,0.00040605685,0.0003887938,0.0031411252,0.00047412358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784255,0.0010601836,0.00006570504,0.00026811802,0.00057354773,0.00018989322],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015092919,0.000080365506,0.0001646106,0.03434674,0.00009373704,0.00075411535,0.000574518,0.0000717076,0.00019994516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056038992,0.000057157136,0.00002774773,0.076546885,0.00013006607,0.00034032683,0.00033645908,0.00011545107,0.00017025798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016654738,0.000009547996,0.8796029,0.0000033226097,0.0000014677248,0.000057676672,0.00037558455,4.706242e-7,0.00000838167,0.0047191745,0.0009842444,0.11422059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014947705,0.000026628113,0.84619397,0.000006279078,5.3347105e-7,0.000005034834,0.00015094136,0.00017225296,0.000093364535,0.0037684604,0.14936294,0.00007012283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010694791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00270109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1483787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011724785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009354182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97659814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564712492","doi":"10.18438/b8c88z","title":"Open Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact Than Articles Not Freely Available","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Sample (material); Population; Citation impact; Library science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Sociology; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.6662192534586677,"score_gpt":0.5933869394796585,"score_spread":0.07283231397900924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564712492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76194215,0.0011560179,0.0034679312,0.13571961,0.0002303167,0.0015314916,0.000114439616,0.000121377874,0.09571665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523355,0.00036094626,0.0022634787,0.0076026777,0.00008720052,0.000049350205,0.00001537601,0.000010255248,0.004377166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024767,0.0012723097,0.0010369313,0.00054192834,0.006156127,0.0007450297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762939,0.019899424,0.0005107348,0.00096980564,0.001857027,0.00046908486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030294036,0.00017828718,0.00025354925,0.018897347,0.0007622434,0.058948614,0.0045289574,0.000115719704,0.005484464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054703765,0.00011901057,0.00008327999,0.058052078,0.00027335534,0.50134397,0.0037149973,0.00046950125,0.0020466864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023257285,0.00032889255,0.4067512,0.000044504024,0.000029154642,0.000042059273,0.0002831517,0.0005952768,0.00074414664,0.036023177,0.43995944,0.11287327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008655961,0.0005006629,0.4652832,0.000091964466,0.0000115710955,0.000029005023,0.0010134791,0.04486519,0.027433334,0.006202469,0.45337895,0.0003245895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011791656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022669265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44239536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000499623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006666751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565511706","doi":"10.1353/ils.2014.0011","title":"A Preliminary Study of the Relationship between the h-Index and Excess Citations / Étude préliminaire de la relation entre l’indice de Hirsch (indice-h) et les citations excédentaires","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Index (typography); Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.14153556382044188,"score_gpt":0.4228877936025121,"score_spread":0.2813522297820702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565511706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97652227,0.0010865403,0.003351714,0.016373498,0.00026564734,0.00032185856,0.000043057553,0.0000038737944,0.0020315137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868304,0.000110289395,0.00058525795,0.00029769272,0.000047673642,0.000004061795,0.0000023686391,0.000005075421,0.00026456805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951969,0.0011496823,0.00092031655,0.00016685859,0.0021640176,0.00040223356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869942,0.010012991,0.0010181864,0.00030468407,0.0008127781,0.0008571305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016240617,0.00012724938,0.00018115115,0.012963532,0.0020111732,0.0033962936,0.0016335454,0.00013826975,0.000057662455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025560366,0.000081974,0.00006429337,0.031928487,0.0017154044,0.009379674,0.00021747287,0.0006665914,0.0000038338035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009522851,0.000027185857,0.930289,0.000019580251,0.000008604411,0.0000017653527,0.023207413,0.0008373914,0.0000017871251,0.012652916,0.0010557096,0.031889178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044830423,0.0003055122,0.95981306,0.00012109751,0.000029147295,0.0000784641,0.023072306,0.006237948,0.000010878936,0.006780106,0.0030149268,0.00008825524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001884999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090111606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031800922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011715153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004775502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565843765","doi":"","title":"Neither Open nor Shut: Health Information Access in Developing and Emerging Countries.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Developing country; Public relations; Business; Information access; Access to information; Health care; Political science; Internet privacy; Economic growth; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5941593521243856,"score_gpt":0.6360898129037973,"score_spread":0.04193046077941165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565843765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6850429,0.0008856139,0.07755925,0.123869546,0.00046599517,0.0015719067,0.00002152613,0.000051704614,0.11053152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98005116,0.0008056793,0.0045152283,0.013725829,0.00001931586,0.000006353333,0.0000036433087,0.000003223489,0.00086955074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560475,0.00008111293,0.00068848365,0.00028249793,0.0029204134,0.00042271134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792856,0.00062575977,0.00018884153,0.00026678768,0.00079190056,0.00019815126],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016691364,0.00008443742,0.00021977557,0.031032654,0.00021133455,0.009561803,0.002110447,0.000044693872,0.0003604555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421506,0.000056637662,0.000017071907,0.09833788,0.00003117236,0.005956881,0.0009151276,0.0001121751,0.00010855056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015760197,0.00001837702,0.18968306,0.000004556043,0.0000016413676,0.0000012941061,0.00048644442,0.000028420944,0.0000021432984,0.012959945,0.019364638,0.7774337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047036933,0.000060562616,0.79528695,0.000012893815,2.3371925e-7,0.000002227062,0.0004079969,0.0047763893,0.000051956213,0.0062784725,0.19253665,0.00011529226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009760263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029789802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7773184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014351844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043714247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99146634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568789937","doi":"10.1002/asi.23166","title":"The kiss of death? The effect of being cited in a review on subsequent citations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Montreal Heart Institute; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; KISS (TNC); Science Citation Index; Specialty; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.23939433756577272,"score_gpt":0.5484870714168609,"score_spread":0.3090927338510882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568789937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035045962,0.9811047,0.00027614832,0.010081207,0.0010312918,0.0024514347,0.00004102787,0.0000067650526,0.001502851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023315739,0.97645193,0.00003689954,0.000076428034,0.000015557687,0.000033723984,8.838811e-7,0.0000030119575,0.00006583612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99109256,0.00043554895,0.0022890798,0.00012978473,0.0057738735,0.00027916802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663704,0.017391786,0.0076632346,0.0005675488,0.007953042,0.000053992495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10178455,0.00011941769,0.0008612396,0.023357745,0.0004553932,0.00042435195,0.003493434,0.00017709988,0.0000016068939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25731117,0.000043081007,0.0003217243,0.104076356,0.00038818485,0.00076503237,0.00031602313,0.00047453618,0.0000044217463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059638182,0.0000087527,0.0018256216,0.00060447346,0.000024875875,4.7519887e-8,0.00005383388,0.0000060750663,0.000001884104,0.012035537,0.0013432617,0.9840897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003203028,0.00046648568,0.0013061638,0.0033409821,0.00010416211,0.000013708167,0.00010829248,0.00020571513,0.0000993122,0.0052240305,0.9887345,0.00007637674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034065367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030344302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98739123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042208534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006269074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98771167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572712462","doi":"","title":"Harnad Comments on Canada’s NSERC/SSHRC/CIHR Draft Tri-Agency Open Access Policy. Canadian Tri-Agency Call for Comments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Publication; Institution; Compliance (psychology); Political science; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.209948260839589,"score_gpt":0.4157440696272036,"score_spread":0.2057958087876146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572712462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86730736,0.0005851197,0.0006548137,0.10126595,0.00080672855,0.0032244676,0.00088697096,0.000045458335,0.025223115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98193985,0.00027991613,0.00029590653,0.007624779,0.00013772622,0.00008446366,0.000066870125,0.00004859885,0.009521887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005216,0.00051408494,0.00095945015,0.0014438989,0.005007558,0.0020228392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881434,0.0042616096,0.00052084087,0.0018342003,0.002109488,0.0031304948],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042625978,0.0005412052,0.00082411343,0.02673625,0.0024278827,0.004319418,0.014786696,0.00021177543,0.0023522675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007632827,0.00046981033,0.0003391808,0.03766591,0.00021866853,0.002713005,0.0030135524,0.00057931175,0.0005768106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014909508,0.00029821412,0.038917355,0.000011351456,0.0001242365,0.00013129126,0.004859804,0.00006144219,0.000053409687,0.0011812276,0.62561023,0.3286023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037149251,0.0004678756,0.53938186,0.00003105085,0.000037645852,0.000013536376,0.0026916678,0.004986355,0.00007332163,0.00611027,0.44168574,0.0008057368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99973696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5004645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042317105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145572275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573484005","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101147","title":"Uncertainty of author citation rankings: Lessons from in‐text citation weighing schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Weighting; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; Medicine; Radiology; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.1825142580732141,"score_gpt":0.4733073030465287,"score_spread":0.2907930449733146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573484005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887065,0.000025102861,0.0033726364,0.006846572,0.00008547034,0.0002702274,0.000018511948,0.000018845278,0.00065607636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961604,0.00004949085,0.010086161,0.00019842265,0.000009413927,0.000023660972,0.000001211135,0.0000025630727,0.000013063992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956212,0.000008025803,0.0006930354,0.00027882349,0.0030715514,0.00032735887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99001664,0.0011486068,0.0013972217,0.00019604724,0.007176018,0.00006547954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015908318,0.00008926961,0.0002821739,0.011659478,0.00031349008,0.00041615247,0.0016845556,0.000074871634,0.00000271584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04228269,0.000059337894,0.00011091215,0.115449995,0.0023910478,0.002515659,0.00045406705,0.00015537866,0.0000018852683],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030864427,0.000034862867,0.07400158,0.000032930348,0.000013836168,3.8718055e-9,0.003551325,0.00003571124,0.05465082,0.11160619,0.001471875,0.75457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001835837,0.000675034,0.21362288,0.000118268836,0.000030008478,0.0000024614967,0.09317694,0.2388285,0.09248836,0.32222992,0.036545157,0.00044664307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010418492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027169565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7541234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095580865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001796305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576976718","doi":"10.3386/w20012","title":"Why Stars Matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tetra Tech (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stars; Astrophysics; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.8938438393618267,"score_gpt":0.7133195741200734,"score_spread":0.18052426524175325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576976718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003449929,0.00092741457,0.000100048215,0.004747781,0.001665783,0.0005432295,0.00029765116,0.000010771414,0.9882574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78276515,0.0024687948,0.00081226235,0.00065702636,0.0031199895,0.00014920933,0.00042503528,0.00012580522,0.20947671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485987,0.00095468154,0.0021541407,0.0015943947,0.045587525,0.001110602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380093,0.02156113,0.000887845,0.0014085509,0.037588257,0.0005449023],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1683985,0.00029049465,0.00097069715,0.12578043,0.00028384003,0.0020418225,0.0058356686,0.00067289657,0.020993138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092679545,0.00022861446,0.0004833202,0.04289226,0.00073901686,0.0004767392,0.001779645,0.0014770258,0.010619855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002114874,0.00006753883,0.01365189,0.000035034824,0.00005815537,0.0000030001597,0.000010978885,0.00009629134,0.000038610102,0.012600537,0.9665071,0.006909735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023374979,0.00010765891,0.008505834,0.00002770283,0.0000033783153,0.000012434465,0.000027677255,0.0006997536,0.00009129484,0.26548728,0.72459865,0.00020460844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035108475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027466475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77931523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026681426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581079432","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.376819","title":"Scatter And Obsolescence Of Journals Cited In Dissertations Of Librarianship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Obsolescence; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.24540552537627766,"score_gpt":0.41916391433314915,"score_spread":0.17375838895687148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581079432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915487,0.00075535267,0.0010178824,0.000391362,0.00008110026,0.00010129308,0.000014803881,0.0000060535417,0.0060834065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531865,0.000083252555,0.0016020157,0.000006390718,0.000012928453,1.2495254e-7,0.0000021443745,0.0000040060813,0.0029704724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668634,0.00016758221,0.00050882675,0.0003247698,0.002101204,0.00021128777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969025,0.00101079,0.0005619583,0.00033766733,0.0010619034,0.00012514774],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018680495,0.00009038257,0.00034772514,0.013410848,0.00029473938,0.00024511645,0.0010824116,0.000094905365,0.0001493639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010910828,0.0000857605,0.00011697986,0.042886086,0.00035621758,0.00090348144,0.00037550484,0.00013880392,0.0000025616187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006680371,0.00029907256,0.90152925,0.000026410033,0.000015096451,0.000026996633,0.0010334416,0.00006176176,0.08984791,0.0005516528,0.0028207041,0.00372091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004059826,0.000101884114,0.98327523,0.00005231261,0.0000074551363,0.00000755702,0.004459356,0.00076814054,0.009597593,0.0007462727,0.00048986694,0.00008836231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014898492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016606109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081745975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035965153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015052402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581752436","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03917.x","title":"Editorial: Citation analysis – focus on leading Australian nurse authors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Watson; Citation; Listing (finance); Index (typography); Subject (documents); Medicine; Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Nursing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5684659979264239,"score_gpt":0.6619747808854075,"score_spread":0.09350878295898357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581752436","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001357394,0.00017863436,0.0024717813,0.0015302048,0.9901772,0.00013977091,0.00005913918,0.000014020828,0.004071828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01736067,0.00027892445,0.0016422687,0.00001623258,0.97723615,0.0000010815717,0.000011834609,0.00003987928,0.0034129713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95758635,0.0021535864,0.0066810576,0.0010749204,0.03164127,0.0008628008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8807199,0.08488984,0.010761279,0.0014168512,0.020019231,0.0021928763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12698181,0.0004306433,0.0027890769,0.105762355,0.00029120885,0.00311998,0.0043759607,0.0025718838,0.00043988734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43413603,0.00029451714,0.003029778,0.13191146,0.00048510465,0.0009431965,0.00010774014,0.005741851,0.00030542037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047271958,0.00062524085,0.0012163111,0.0000037331981,0.0004006249,0.000034531917,0.0001171182,0.00006558472,0.0000024662897,0.00010400452,0.87986875,0.11708893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011088732,0.0024778454,0.0033341846,0.0003398584,0.0009996708,0.0000023151347,0.00025133562,0.00018227803,0.000022123688,0.029853608,0.96105677,0.00037111665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003608025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009683044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30715424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005081082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015458234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583343309","doi":"10.3386/w19653","title":"Collaboration, Stars, and the Changing Organization of Science: Evidence from Evolutionary Biology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Stars; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.7481729510294182,"score_gpt":0.6608296926846551,"score_spread":0.08734325834476309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583343309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7675659,0.04685543,0.0014180662,0.01854973,0.006080219,0.005967692,0.0023206717,0.00004100148,0.15120126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908424,0.0070074555,0.00046457868,0.000013201731,0.0003959573,0.00004016731,0.00012719899,0.00001529836,0.0028519044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801917,0.0008201247,0.0015126559,0.0010384728,0.015862824,0.0005742411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87811387,0.03256023,0.0012417953,0.00086493307,0.08698484,0.00023431155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11748522,0.00016734144,0.00062251725,0.061201923,0.00070356677,0.001141597,0.0034081987,0.00031298966,0.0015357473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28247756,0.00010810788,0.000086580476,0.09696585,0.006271306,0.0012269864,0.0019677484,0.00052941387,0.00013004892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014430104,0.00016198769,0.14106743,0.0000910559,0.00022056757,0.0000013150848,0.0018336101,0.00053125614,0.0066046924,0.49330994,0.33706686,0.018966949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187228,0.0002009664,0.070802234,0.00018814339,0.000019737608,0.000010617529,0.0023382574,0.015618338,0.0024818387,0.89634734,0.010464495,0.00034080862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004653753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049651855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40303737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015993915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018322345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585638762","doi":"10.3171/2009.12.jns091600","title":"Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Neurosurgery; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Randomized controlled trial; MEDLINE; Grading (engineering); Library science; Surgery","score_opus":0.646295052394199,"score_gpt":0.550198320626132,"score_spread":0.09609673176806699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585638762","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007509574,0.97457874,0.00006783296,0.0015292066,0.015430488,0.00043898358,0.00003345463,0.000013009603,0.0003987004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012324525,0.9961412,0.00003932634,0.00038884065,0.0010490201,0.0000139683425,0.0000051949437,0.00005914978,0.0010708557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97781223,0.0024218925,0.005460329,0.00081947487,0.012530615,0.0009554331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393345,0.04905089,0.0059252195,0.0014274769,0.003635636,0.0006262607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05471197,0.0005297849,0.0027752155,0.12579848,0.0003991498,0.0044966815,0.004404505,0.00069665076,0.00018357173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12045867,0.00027544415,0.002032035,0.26341602,0.00031821907,0.0011591587,0.0008106121,0.0049123294,0.000101338745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020036086,0.00016131936,0.0010706633,0.00009194103,0.000016542546,0.00041970029,0.000019544605,0.000011940852,0.0000051026327,0.000034844175,0.06676674,0.93138164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015303933,0.00012935746,0.0023410306,0.0013312888,0.000058993097,0.00039935377,0.000015118549,0.00007674652,0.0000012615865,0.00048875617,0.9947457,0.00025937372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038832095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052129185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93112224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001515547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015933117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588400856","doi":"10.1002/ana.24218","title":"A peek behind the curtain: Peer review and editorial decision making at <i><scp>S</scp>troke</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Research Canada; University of Toronto; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; University of Toronto; American Heart Association","keywords":"Intraclass correlation; Odds ratio; Odds; Confidence interval; Consistency (knowledge bases); Logistic regression; Peer review; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Stroke (engine); Family medicine; Clinical psychology; Internal medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.46637048693521965,"score_gpt":0.5597930264671542,"score_spread":0.09342253953193458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588400856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85946923,0.021648549,0.0007833686,0.09019391,0.0178148,0.0006749318,0.00006115083,0.000027824599,0.009326241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489009,0.012955958,0.00019797824,0.028526377,0.006120525,0.000022479348,0.000004065736,0.00002901932,0.0032427122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895444,0.0008028367,0.0007917912,0.0007324841,0.0075038993,0.0006245881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527695,0.03919699,0.0005615313,0.0011252341,0.006061238,0.0002854707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034308564,0.00016900532,0.0005411664,0.006762143,0.00030213938,0.00040000785,0.0020333426,0.00018431642,0.00010070924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2264536,0.00009629558,0.00017991291,0.019875862,0.00037561034,0.00024598607,0.0014654523,0.0004359569,0.00016310712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026775622,0.000034879646,0.009915443,0.000015256713,0.00000778749,0.00000539007,0.000058798636,0.000006453545,0.00010063,0.00025001887,0.9540864,0.03549212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021856281,0.0005034514,0.033364568,0.00001714457,0.000012939858,0.000033914894,0.0000113567985,0.0003429666,0.00008304649,0.0125806285,0.95278573,0.000045667726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016928916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019071094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19214503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051641487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005521876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99438256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590457913","doi":"10.1080/17521742.2012.713757","title":"What do Canadian Journal Editors Want from Peer Review?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Editors Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Round table; Table (database); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Session (web analytics); Database","score_opus":0.3245269501362181,"score_gpt":0.5029702531478972,"score_spread":0.17844330301167916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590457913","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015601846,0.08682151,0.00019600279,0.15478879,0.7365664,0.0003472808,0.00012007134,0.000029640432,0.005528457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13922706,0.0162099,0.0013827953,0.0035411904,0.80780166,0.000028504575,0.000047037272,0.000068520516,0.03169333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796602,0.00045482497,0.00094259327,0.000571922,0.016896082,0.001474384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98219466,0.0045268876,0.00042486168,0.0010808267,0.007799051,0.003973707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04482911,0.0002451858,0.0004498769,0.019896416,0.00072553457,0.008591946,0.00301957,0.0002466729,0.04156062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110834435,0.00016336862,0.0002827026,0.04278239,0.00020546856,0.0012564366,0.0003282866,0.00092034566,0.01440566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023657851,0.00003350317,0.02540547,0.0000033689394,0.000010651658,0.000019296038,0.00020272302,7.804026e-7,0.000008717353,0.000010868954,0.9532314,0.02107084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015691377,0.000037124923,0.014363958,0.0001430558,0.000010377569,0.000014374258,0.00078342424,0.0000059779877,0.00006212526,0.00052916125,0.9836682,0.00022527795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069894674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030994837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1512476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032136549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007852106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590572075","doi":"10.5539/ass.v11n13p130","title":"The Scientific Articles on Art Criticism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art criticism; The arts; Criticism; Citation; Theatre criticism; Art; Literary criticism; Visual arts; Library science; Art history; Literature; Computer science; Performance art; Literary science","score_opus":0.6153866519150007,"score_gpt":0.5900754236712312,"score_spread":0.025311228243769524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590572075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13127562,0.00010930909,0.0005674002,0.020876031,0.0028360127,0.00021479385,0.000009663648,0.00004582505,0.84406537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97914106,0.0000025210975,0.00012963988,0.0003311842,0.00018168053,0.000007927876,2.948087e-7,0.0000051228894,0.02020059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791109,0.0002173828,0.0004225865,0.0008247576,0.018375393,0.0010489936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925383,0.0016905477,0.00013211643,0.0007734893,0.0040525543,0.000813005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06029088,0.00011096875,0.00014957522,0.011950836,0.004306528,0.0153409615,0.0050480845,0.000054737386,0.000095197036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063506395,0.000061848674,0.000096769254,0.20248616,0.0049517457,0.0009668032,0.00075706583,0.0002337706,0.0044243294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011213049,0.00006954823,0.0014900487,2.885705e-7,0.0000014379393,0.000006917021,0.0009789083,5.7185764e-7,0.0008311474,0.10799495,0.18642502,0.70219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028099885,0.00016428721,0.07977208,0.0000028411862,0.0000018638455,0.0000044164026,0.006704852,0.00047943328,0.0027434716,0.22019063,0.6894572,0.00019793524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010105654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021855523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8478654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024371392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094864087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591028215","doi":"","title":"Feasibility of Open Access Publishing for Journals Funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Research council; Political science; Scholarly communication; Open science; Digital humanities; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9598328188527745,"score_gpt":0.7337601371546307,"score_spread":0.22607268169814376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591028215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90653545,0.00094491814,0.0005669714,0.006310174,0.00020350961,0.000724768,0.00007551602,0.0000024773415,0.08463625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485433,0.000022281893,0.00010326843,0.00011802741,0.000043210508,0.0000055516184,2.7770653e-7,0.000004233052,0.0048488416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96049756,0.0003098848,0.000726173,0.0005756317,0.036961854,0.0009288942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90519726,0.019596947,0.0005732489,0.0007460439,0.07355389,0.00033258766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37596276,0.000074011434,0.00026670532,0.008882895,0.0016746164,0.01803901,0.010431036,0.0000522049,0.00015763185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28303763,0.000044038236,0.00003657503,0.1056511,0.0018001341,0.0033678,0.0041099126,0.000317763,2.8303083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020670233,0.00012041264,0.06193346,0.00003096709,0.000013981442,0.0000016591588,0.006005269,0.0000015821064,0.008528563,0.009376091,0.87623143,0.037549853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002005116,0.0003398193,0.5663191,0.00003876025,0.000009015279,0.0000073039514,0.10242827,0.00060786813,0.039112,0.054122046,0.23466484,0.00034587146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33003846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26453108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64156663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152130965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591210727","doi":"10.1086/703160","title":"Age and the Trying Out of New Ideas","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Capital","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Aalto-Yliopisto","keywords":"Assertion; Biomedicine; Work (physics); Test (biology); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.641428749180741,"score_gpt":0.5710017791758731,"score_spread":0.07042697000486786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591210727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99068063,0.0035356055,0.00031956407,0.00084381364,0.00048102584,0.00005404604,0.0000015376428,0.0000013763622,0.0040823705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681324,0.00005868395,0.00027505503,0.000041916566,0.00023226123,1.3953681e-7,8.4777135e-8,0.000003732878,0.0025748818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345833,0.0001504628,0.00073217566,0.0001233608,0.0053539504,0.00018170394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566424,0.001329714,0.0006064969,0.00023709564,0.001756473,0.0004059811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020616237,0.000065306376,0.0003111004,0.011536696,0.000089574554,0.0008740736,0.0011765355,0.000038927563,0.000108378175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016840322,0.00003076348,0.00015324487,0.012102041,0.00028502115,0.00041771255,0.00028407743,0.00023752988,0.000022012007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009165917,0.0004885965,0.121129945,0.000020598587,0.00028729698,0.0009681337,0.058843814,0.00011086438,0.008855293,0.06700857,0.5453763,0.19599402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011046735,0.0017715371,0.1377724,0.000041945732,0.000047220514,0.00026210648,0.016223144,0.00030961426,0.0011120231,0.8080003,0.023159558,0.00025336255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004636941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015461736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032995467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021210084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593807601","doi":"10.3386/w10875","title":"Standing on Academic Shoulders: Measuring Scientific Influence in Universities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Political science; Mathematics; Geography; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.901965728604337,"score_gpt":0.6916294035109724,"score_spread":0.21033632509336464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593807601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94330984,0.00017832025,0.000040294934,0.0012720248,0.00018948717,0.00020522614,0.000018822226,0.0000071718227,0.05477882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850804,0.000065867374,0.00012947399,0.000020041403,0.000049665898,0.000006767821,0.0000038379612,0.000006773118,0.0012095632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987145,0.00025463998,0.0006840482,0.0007338689,0.010543557,0.0006389036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895552,0.005891386,0.00015507148,0.00037719132,0.0037971397,0.00022400927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055020902,0.00009992279,0.00022763574,0.08082079,0.00036679348,0.0010339945,0.0023332804,0.00014665716,0.00022184425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019471765,0.000087684566,0.00008077678,0.048359297,0.00073255744,0.0012908755,0.0005144523,0.00079461787,0.00042947437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106760555,0.00010733002,0.037552677,0.000010219664,0.0000129326245,0.000010252298,0.0005797654,0.10066479,0.0037477918,0.8523017,0.0016453901,0.0032603792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010655381,0.00015341141,0.04029511,0.00007571397,7.204998e-7,0.0000027605224,0.0027929987,0.0022962843,0.0067247474,0.94528675,0.0011500933,0.00015588787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042321932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118135606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0983685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034028143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025565259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595508338","doi":"","title":"Canada shut out at Ig Nobels","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Europe PMC (PubMed Central)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shut down; Shame; Operations research; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.304914450536996,"score_gpt":0.41976724058554377,"score_spread":0.11485279004854776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595508338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7505211,0.0018447901,0.000504595,0.0025280097,0.005654315,0.0006499914,0.00013924511,0.000057010442,0.2381009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92593277,0.00031882414,0.00023919542,0.0008791926,0.00014595623,0.000019592837,0.0000044876133,0.000030853076,0.07242912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98496276,0.0006245828,0.00081158953,0.0011022276,0.01000654,0.0024923093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932954,0.0018615943,0.00024231609,0.0012654071,0.0014404099,0.0018948715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011762211,0.00025937762,0.00036764273,0.009689107,0.00037366417,0.0014762104,0.0025825617,0.00008168951,0.0026454702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04574436,0.00018630727,0.00013209562,0.08385631,0.00013490376,0.00036909617,0.0006154293,0.0003445514,0.0013310513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022727005,0.000116448165,0.35675013,0.000004948042,0.000026521573,0.00027974343,0.0003648791,0.00005265323,0.00041120674,0.00140167,0.5670575,0.073511556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033089076,0.000021076929,0.20130238,0.000002206825,0.0000039894085,0.000013618586,0.00004547078,0.000051216844,0.0036445851,0.00023748094,0.794138,0.00020907368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021581434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08682624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2270805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008327404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017163957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595946397","doi":"10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a439","title":"The access principle: The case for open access to research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Presentation (obstetrics); Publishing; Open access publishing; Open science; Open access journal; Free access; Political science; World Wide Web; Public access; Open data; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Public relations; Law; Medicine; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8622194212442152,"score_gpt":0.7137649815928947,"score_spread":0.14845443965132055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595946397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86291367,0.001785132,0.009931626,0.10409909,0.0016188769,0.0030710597,0.00010511462,0.000012488544,0.01646296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863208,0.00023477827,0.0001904228,0.00057305535,0.0008605757,0.00012826362,0.0000010423587,0.000017372893,0.011673681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98690027,0.0016248985,0.0008741013,0.00051624177,0.008786228,0.0012982594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569628,0.033128656,0.0003505156,0.0016925404,0.007384985,0.00048045302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17090178,0.00014727851,0.00021649648,0.012904441,0.009112483,0.12225104,0.03841625,0.000063533866,0.00038516594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050182935,0.000049193364,0.00018699231,0.14043322,0.00048001562,0.0022546642,0.012384864,0.0010427978,0.00020248993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022304786,0.000105423234,0.010241904,0.0000022582344,0.0000276547,0.00039414302,0.00017440967,0.0005401586,0.000523747,0.010040488,0.7769637,0.20076305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010071766,0.00031765626,0.0457086,0.000023413857,0.000013033949,0.0029390117,0.0019271782,0.0051224935,0.007383585,0.2324449,0.70286155,0.00025141542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010322217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014029031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2224044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019990806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006999605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598310546","doi":"","title":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","year":2008,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Paradigmes: economia productiva i coneixement","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science","score_opus":0.5389205968513442,"score_gpt":0.47610652513235613,"score_spread":0.06281407171898806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598310546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94004315,0.009020647,0.0004466055,0.0032891813,0.004187462,0.0016415337,0.00013312136,0.000029868017,0.04120841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464851,0.00465373,0.000910658,0.00009056565,0.00039353492,0.000051897507,0.000013741107,0.000033933244,0.047366843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872015,0.0004146014,0.0027429147,0.0027086774,0.0052107954,0.0017214727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908888,0.0018858074,0.0014539515,0.0027849586,0.0019879127,0.0009985861],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009588061,0.00064670196,0.0014447446,0.022799607,0.0007124489,0.00076753326,0.003837526,0.00025981196,0.015728366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00493946,0.0005654031,0.0005122508,0.034062475,0.0014442133,0.0012800125,0.0013842949,0.0006663583,0.002763715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000643239,0.0034517692,0.72658813,0.00019159718,0.00072863564,0.00016990848,0.01379406,0.0008901835,0.001884786,0.0062473887,0.18021853,0.065191776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025279685,0.0011501099,0.17460924,0.000095289266,0.000063882726,0.00011689968,0.001573919,0.000843108,0.029429035,0.0024200452,0.78603536,0.0011351187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025246976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024720377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60581684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001548335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003679871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598481361","doi":"","title":"Open Access Policy Update","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Agency (philosophy); Library science; Public administration; Alliance; Public policy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.44135142519868553,"score_gpt":0.5422289887435497,"score_spread":0.10087756354486421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598481361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77522635,0.00032579782,0.008074537,0.0022976499,0.0005584856,0.0003499687,0.000025926705,0.00005045949,0.2130908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95588994,0.00016009122,0.002404963,0.0001562024,0.00012876646,2.292909e-7,0.0000056346607,0.000011450726,0.041242715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930344,0.00018058128,0.0005080716,0.0008446622,0.004767236,0.0006650218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994363,0.0010944678,0.0006107254,0.0010960132,0.0022210542,0.0006147],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008996744,0.00017861137,0.0004613665,0.023598922,0.0017928455,0.0047870344,0.014183033,0.00016730613,0.0010434875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035553211,0.00016898365,0.00023645096,0.10760681,0.00038647986,0.004003058,0.012509612,0.0002531463,0.00021310568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008294027,0.0013077542,0.19230567,0.000034348875,0.00022321372,0.0009063064,0.0026292645,0.00007414272,0.018751634,0.012805344,0.45508543,0.3150475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010242838,0.00025575748,0.34987772,0.000015736026,0.000014964548,0.000044033677,0.004555911,0.00040424903,0.0055589033,0.002267686,0.63561136,0.00036941507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005362045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034490554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31467807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030809492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006951658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598584067","doi":"10.11575/prism/29747","title":"One year (almost) with the Open Access Authors Fund","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trust fund; Presentation (obstetrics); Business; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.4905294365897821,"score_gpt":0.49107287069680167,"score_spread":0.0005434341070195692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598584067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255734,0.0002710278,0.002253503,0.0066215903,0.00022934921,0.00047733771,0.000015774618,0.00003966809,0.16451834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954704,0.0000683629,0.0017933097,0.00012661549,0.000053703872,4.1310744e-7,0.0000030167087,0.0000075585913,0.043243058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936839,0.00027465748,0.0002822088,0.0007116233,0.0046016355,0.00044601804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576706,0.0007820313,0.00045908746,0.0010487447,0.0015992837,0.0003437831],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042670453,0.00015776891,0.0003952709,0.0061536427,0.0021017897,0.0050802547,0.010463966,0.000119696095,0.00067340326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008215823,0.00011420135,0.00014953,0.060395814,0.0003889463,0.00266828,0.0034456754,0.00030281406,0.00007290841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001905206,0.002459248,0.10202144,0.000028851586,0.00041120962,0.00042245636,0.0077746892,0.00032286838,0.013974453,0.010201698,0.6316611,0.22881675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013331469,0.001270879,0.71314627,0.000032689397,0.00004601422,0.000025172416,0.011773927,0.00062114064,0.0017484613,0.0012336777,0.26834464,0.00042397296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093013595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013379093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6111249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013635331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003728117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600077369","doi":"10.1002/bult.2012.1720380605","title":"The decade of metrics? Examining the evolution of metrics within and outside LIS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Citation; Information science; Data science; Library science; Citation analysis; Natural science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17308075906179352,"score_gpt":0.442839061113643,"score_spread":0.2697583020518495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600077369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982698,0.0016808526,0.00616009,0.007759101,0.00023265794,0.0004771867,0.00003063213,0.000013900956,0.0009475671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458015,0.0004835529,0.004670314,0.00017323489,0.000010262286,0.000015559157,2.2348308e-7,0.000002705772,0.000063986736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948577,0.00006167923,0.0008384212,0.0001813523,0.0036474748,0.0004133528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875323,0.0055627604,0.0019017755,0.00068533403,0.0042268885,0.000090945265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0348351,0.0000949503,0.00027370558,0.0076480503,0.00077077653,0.0002407078,0.002408775,0.00007473799,0.0000033886672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06907135,0.000043271168,0.00012070904,0.12780716,0.0074150786,0.0005106265,0.001201215,0.00019538985,0.0000023718605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040575058,0.000071983886,0.26269075,0.000038070903,0.00006383002,1.6813996e-8,0.0036324211,0.000039985447,0.003987643,0.07402074,0.016644794,0.63876915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010828229,0.0011280228,0.43487492,0.000038261926,0.00008846837,0.000033071916,0.21042152,0.013994319,0.0408997,0.011612522,0.28542614,0.00040023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020168106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020799334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63836896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009721481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025891289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99528617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601970840","doi":"10.18438/b8n32f","title":"Scholars in International Relations Cite Books More Frequently than Journals: More Research is Needed to Better Understand Research Behaviour and Use","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Subject (documents); Collection development; Citation analysis; Sample (material); Impact factor; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5838780484821268,"score_gpt":0.5853591350904922,"score_spread":0.001481086608365434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601970840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5261729,0.0006595039,0.0013064292,0.46770677,0.000112435446,0.0005237026,0.000044833363,0.00002132568,0.003452118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388456,0.001684975,0.0077356286,0.049452763,0.00007710009,0.000019805928,0.000017116796,0.000009680399,0.0021573573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877154,0.0012854292,0.0010256845,0.0005057187,0.008848383,0.00061934633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773277,0.018363457,0.00028901332,0.00059144694,0.0027791506,0.00064925326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03590343,0.00015066769,0.00019528967,0.049061988,0.0007726371,0.018280625,0.0013081875,0.00017976823,0.0007622244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096774116,0.00012314573,0.000050532763,0.05491219,0.0002582954,0.24079455,0.00063416647,0.0016243986,0.00017330132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016779205,0.00038052897,0.56068027,0.00002525352,0.00003631766,0.00012149127,0.010378447,0.00036835103,0.0006587072,0.034904115,0.2772563,0.11351228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007358174,0.00039719482,0.7979556,0.00031831863,0.0000058223336,0.000035264467,0.01905254,0.008318139,0.0006325251,0.0048509287,0.16745915,0.00023871278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013602723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.442137e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.418254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012799205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1627199058","doi":"10.3171/2010.3.jns1032","title":"Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Index (typography); MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3416448425911635,"score_gpt":0.5519332360853685,"score_spread":0.21028839349420497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1627199058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99792963,0.0002015038,0.000046343222,0.000989157,0.0006665191,0.00007472756,0.000011551602,0.0000017050033,0.000078861085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990862,0.00037072378,0.000049670005,0.0003641852,0.000097002645,3.279078e-7,1.0743934e-7,0.000009747374,0.000022040193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444216,0.00030398346,0.0008899096,0.00025550488,0.0036778762,0.00043057583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905744,0.006137791,0.0010069299,0.00028076884,0.0011374197,0.0008626879],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012492008,0.0001292265,0.0004428221,0.02317706,0.0002034508,0.0008293266,0.00082443166,0.00008616927,0.000059224927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539441,0.00006937026,0.00016730104,0.03718654,0.00053227256,0.0005223771,0.00019939907,0.0010257598,0.0000014843009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047747457,0.000025913929,0.95906466,0.0000012889823,0.000011417023,0.00012270406,0.00003636636,0.000022724245,0.022170603,0.000009827528,0.00073832343,0.017748434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002475382,0.00016864663,0.9910791,0.0000052630153,0.000009783713,0.0011090068,0.00006302507,0.0020055037,0.00043181423,0.0005172411,0.0042887633,0.00007432082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035207379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034838065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032014444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032569485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007301614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628131229","doi":"10.1111/caje.12077","title":"Incentives for Journal Editors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Selection (genetic algorithm); Citation; Computer science; Test (biology); Positive economics; Library science; Data science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.6173384028673773,"score_gpt":0.3755369723383634,"score_spread":0.24180143052901387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628131229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754194,0.00026154716,0.0041821743,0.004499165,0.013601542,0.00021034514,0.00012106004,0.0000025647355,0.0017022125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98854357,0.000096687014,0.0019018033,0.0004506486,0.0074938005,0.0000059557874,0.0000030485112,0.000034390712,0.0014700914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629265,0.0002133252,0.0017306203,0.00046816448,0.00004435312,0.0012509064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98512024,0.0036641608,0.0015300091,0.00056959514,0.0039551137,0.0051608747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023655009,0.00024047692,0.0007459359,0.032922342,0.00054192764,0.0028653299,0.0031402814,0.00021532516,0.00049015816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034158498,0.0002167685,0.00053302693,0.0069419947,0.0002750905,0.0012736626,0.00006647788,0.00054476183,0.000068294576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022230399,0.000058266647,0.08326112,0.00002778208,0.0002908631,0.00012300877,0.0014537696,0.0065167546,0.000076446544,0.39221203,0.25783387,0.25792378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080950244,0.00061646476,0.0032996594,0.000021808719,0.00001391609,0.00035856347,0.00041380821,0.004595367,0.00011582803,0.39957598,0.58992106,0.00025805572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009289721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6041141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5948244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018074806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042384905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636682838","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2014-0412","title":"Calibrated fair measure of particle physics publications: indices to quantify an individual’s scientific research output","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Quality (philosophy); Particle (ecology); Calibration; Probability and statistics","score_opus":0.7915906332864164,"score_gpt":0.5712327260204231,"score_spread":0.22035790726599336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636682838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820464,0.00024494535,0.013648637,0.0021300872,0.0006341093,0.00022784284,0.0001238709,0.000007472688,0.00093662326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979982,0.0000037072111,0.000906475,0.00010198173,0.0003191838,0.000003951246,0.000006929598,0.000017303679,0.0006423134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875838,0.0009614533,0.0009888409,0.00050621014,0.009059375,0.000900326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781031,0.0018791892,0.0005669802,0.0010204851,0.015789421,0.0026408532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043651074,0.00014388599,0.00040440753,0.02151717,0.00073038746,0.0051354286,0.0042534666,0.000106583626,0.00015577828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028741036,0.00011207326,0.000155866,0.14803046,0.0006943509,0.0019744413,0.00019646106,0.00060124905,0.00015247897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028607743,0.00040902046,0.3189561,0.000018197932,0.000079364676,0.00001179448,0.004960475,0.0015732928,0.0060894736,0.070295475,0.08246266,0.5151155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018625371,0.002620227,0.5725882,0.00017622359,0.00006209468,0.000023650655,0.0072300998,0.024706624,0.06883344,0.13612305,0.18485144,0.00092242705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017765223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040350677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5141931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016042712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042193807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1692430885","doi":"10.18438/b8k904","title":"Citations to Conference Papers Indicate They Are Declining in Importance across All Discipline Areas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation index; Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Index (typography); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3444022305402201,"score_gpt":0.5347875061949723,"score_spread":0.19038527565475216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1692430885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6401802,0.0004996051,0.006118295,0.33864102,0.000201441,0.00067652424,0.00008068544,0.000084198524,0.013518054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945501,0.0007756355,0.0044815154,0.04901135,0.000025720949,0.00001919464,0.000021622687,0.000003706107,0.00016022171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521667,0.000296039,0.0010223002,0.000389739,0.0026351782,0.00044006217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694897,0.010735188,0.0007722129,0.0005102537,0.0005704878,0.00046287593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010136419,0.00014718166,0.00021927743,0.008894441,0.00027975565,0.004642751,0.0010965072,0.000093137634,0.00029881063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0826281,0.00011102926,0.000047188667,0.036192577,0.000065546585,0.14365059,0.00030141504,0.00034922193,0.00018500567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010033473,0.00030762696,0.58131754,0.000032952827,0.000017500613,0.000050131184,0.005357021,0.0034523148,0.00026275695,0.063784316,0.007751896,0.3366626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035628694,0.00020762176,0.8797299,0.00011911008,0.0000040068203,0.0000067081965,0.0045558396,0.006310911,0.00016633228,0.0020907086,0.10625798,0.0001945795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007169162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025383135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.336468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026080645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027091178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722754901","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.03","title":"Do Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science Publish Disproportionately in the Journals for Which They Serve as Board Members?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Publication; Library science; On board; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; History","score_opus":0.3070951898295489,"score_gpt":0.47969082041121336,"score_spread":0.17259563058166444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722754901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246588,0.0009471474,0.00012698564,0.044951223,0.015056961,0.00045179352,0.000020381203,0.000010141141,0.013776608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926931,0.00038027405,0.0018066134,0.00079900713,0.00424825,0.000010145141,0.0000032726582,0.000011363068,0.000047968435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717105,0.00063258415,0.0024216801,0.00044952478,0.023971308,0.0008143821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96249086,0.006050499,0.0027111724,0.0007255553,0.026581578,0.0014403294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19510193,0.00018907356,0.00044626236,0.06258448,0.00041251554,0.31243765,0.0064455904,0.0003101777,0.0000710814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38800213,0.00011033722,0.0001447661,0.11515202,0.00016563023,0.5888901,0.0009806755,0.002630725,0.000006623396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006503983,0.00025712102,0.6265056,0.00002118857,0.000029214978,0.000041268337,0.008330861,0.0009597539,0.00015876332,0.014152527,0.3100745,0.038818777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005301944,0.0007773499,0.34261513,0.00016673259,0.000016965001,0.00021254248,0.034205154,0.0023739524,0.00011636078,0.11161566,0.50218135,0.0004168645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025492776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28389052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029795952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030618657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750323602","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of Iranian Scientists Productions in Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology based on ISI through 2000 to 2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Biotechnology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.8058859249098295,"score_gpt":0.7134467555489087,"score_spread":0.09243916936092078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750323602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98592055,0.006102284,0.000876818,0.0011985896,0.0008169639,0.0010363881,0.000069177986,0.000009922441,0.003969291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976362,0.0007034218,0.00124616,0.00019319175,0.000058089525,0.000041355874,0.0000042265888,0.00001364011,0.00010369797],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922145,0.00072103285,0.0011437024,0.00079589715,0.0044711926,0.00065364875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943462,0.0013534368,0.00068759307,0.000848233,0.0024213034,0.00034326166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045981538,0.0001967288,0.00063594955,0.054903015,0.00023684769,0.0012049549,0.003728207,0.00019173793,0.0051468834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021510908,0.00015081938,0.000083350846,0.10157949,0.00042494404,0.0014982057,0.0012174016,0.0003533926,0.000056536774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001498767,0.0009278953,0.36206633,0.000014913971,0.000034672026,0.0000019357424,0.00029814892,0.00133206,0.4438186,0.00028412475,0.03498207,0.15608938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009027551,0.00004464025,0.84282273,0.000059410773,0.000028622997,0.00001114314,0.00014130794,0.00068073906,0.13400136,0.004500034,0.016546825,0.00026044148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031232426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007012264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4807564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025089973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053272204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766974604","doi":"10.7202/1032829ar","title":"Dérives et effets pervers de l’évaluation quantitative de la recherche : sur les mauvais usages de la bibliométrie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5883950721125247,"score_gpt":0.5286102148543582,"score_spread":0.05978485725816651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766974604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8474263,0.0048979805,0.06986751,0.06789132,0.0005011554,0.0004076336,0.00020849454,0.000082803774,0.008716804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50521487,0.16720617,0.22787693,0.001086841,0.0004708552,0.00019614775,0.00013676888,0.00011814029,0.09769325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97280914,0.021770453,0.0010874235,0.0012047408,0.0022102974,0.00091792527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6579603,0.3349257,0.0009943941,0.0009048452,0.003946539,0.0012682223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11818806,0.00043303598,0.00052677194,0.027212935,0.00018423365,0.004498479,0.0017341409,0.0010325953,0.0011647952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45485595,0.000452656,0.0003785531,0.024394864,0.0008219539,0.0019216137,0.000709531,0.0019137659,0.00048373087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002949831,0.0009232418,0.44528106,0.00009443199,0.00021826928,0.00024610534,0.0073478306,0.06492771,0.0015361535,0.033963677,0.042146154,0.40302038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028383362,0.00029229943,0.47148344,0.00062758673,0.000088111294,0.00041658452,0.0017842781,0.21950959,0.0014482044,0.11922896,0.18162228,0.0006603212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004136845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039726356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40236008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035970644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039884048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767272795","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5","title":"The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4652,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Directory; Computer science; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6780420299185497,"score_gpt":0.6098436100295971,"score_spread":0.06819841988895259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767272795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97595584,0.003999752,0.0046122884,0.00020417503,0.0007329189,0.0001741945,0.000037939775,0.0000053967206,0.01427749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978505,0.0007961409,0.0008597731,0.000021692464,0.000021083526,0.0000010195303,3.463934e-7,0.0000028411425,0.000446605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428096,0.00041218387,0.0011759534,0.00051766087,0.032911114,0.0007021165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94693005,0.0100336075,0.0012141656,0.001055681,0.03948574,0.0012807787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17926545,0.00013699303,0.0005580933,0.25405735,0.0007816073,0.002532158,0.004579442,0.000058656515,0.000034977926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19043386,0.0000739299,0.00015185864,0.8145463,0.005190757,0.0010767195,0.0013767644,0.00027966313,0.000018335248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001534978,0.0004063345,0.8360892,0.00000975065,0.00023411625,0.0000068952463,0.0038662988,0.0018332454,0.0045858664,0.0050961617,0.0175405,0.13017815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002708204,0.0017921032,0.766818,0.000021351834,0.00026941564,0.00005672234,0.016396187,0.1313935,0.013746417,0.012000176,0.05426313,0.00053478964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054865723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024595498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56048894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024674425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003039995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1768967210","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.12223","title":"The top 100 cited articles in urology: An update.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Library science; New england; Science Citation Index; Family medicine; Urology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5106426958614512,"score_gpt":0.49985119378074205,"score_spread":0.010791502080709114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1768967210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98520386,0.0004767819,0.00010353617,0.009990493,0.00031403863,0.00056135555,0.0000031391462,0.000021749505,0.0033250558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975121,0.00006175015,0.0000647678,0.00053895405,0.000048945843,0.00045954957,0.0000010881113,0.0000055815503,0.0013072748],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462867,0.00034062576,0.00046019614,0.00044890164,0.0032472864,0.00087432447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944833,0.0032939713,0.0000959871,0.00081248174,0.0008910495,0.00042320366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018810764,0.000083334795,0.0001418843,0.021389,0.00021248564,0.0031848976,0.0021953871,0.00007682189,0.00050611916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025714068,0.000043542022,0.000049037644,0.12383046,0.00019374935,0.0008048796,0.0004039817,0.0002043799,0.00088678824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007401257,0.00005193594,0.22455697,1.3234683e-7,0.000002298973,0.0000021995215,0.000025632451,0.000009196244,0.00001442166,0.0008163454,0.009128392,0.7653851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019845196,0.000017330172,0.9297217,1.0850743e-7,7.0459896e-7,9.744937e-7,0.00012486392,0.0032464834,0.00008007711,0.027104508,0.03944172,0.00006304751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021411473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121294666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.765322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045155943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003544856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774927437","doi":"10.1023/a:1012761903614","title":"Investigating the concentration within a research community using joint publications and co-authorship via intermediaries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Statistical Institute; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9143610746626762,"score_gpt":0.6578600446631518,"score_spread":0.2565010299995244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774927437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726645,0.00052262517,0.017817054,0.0034463578,0.00062736904,0.00056147017,0.000022608447,0.00005157914,0.004286471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563587,0.00009657643,0.002963396,0.0002551333,0.00011031246,0.000021703223,0.000008446481,0.000014578344,0.0008939884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741909,0.004210167,0.0012878188,0.0008727388,0.018108575,0.0013297987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336367,0.042077243,0.0010344805,0.0031642043,0.018022709,0.0020646104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20395179,0.00019774341,0.0003197948,0.09063404,0.004677109,0.012246966,0.0036195558,0.00018760307,0.0001540988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3803259,0.00012482706,0.00009228703,0.5311368,0.0045192726,0.0015484529,0.001782836,0.0019430174,0.00011283209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011161773,0.0002788132,0.8948023,0.000015592826,0.000021555321,0.0000047153185,0.012732099,0.00019895787,0.0070301443,0.012337531,0.008636611,0.06393056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077392976,0.00036570337,0.5864945,0.00004516,0.000016353495,0.0001360675,0.014907818,0.25502226,0.0039103036,0.1230517,0.014759676,0.00051652745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005938893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114592156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4405028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040056213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006439393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99818987},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1788527215","doi":"10.4000/articulo.2726","title":"Navigating the heavy seas of online publishing: Reflections on ten years editorship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Articulo – revue de sciences humaines","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conviction; Milestone; Political science; Confidentiality; Media studies; Library science; Public relations; History; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7042640301659214,"score_gpt":0.5961317496657306,"score_spread":0.10813228050019086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788527215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663828,0.00018426392,0.00023440563,0.02298777,0.0018851475,0.00018208806,0.00002243014,0.00003571515,0.0080853915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963606,0.000014102408,0.0016035633,0.00039913825,0.0011850959,0.00001008178,0.0000021147807,0.0000075731427,0.00041775615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917761,0.00045690578,0.0006550039,0.0006019557,0.005843083,0.0006669725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991621,0.004610171,0.00035384783,0.000705184,0.00223406,0.00047569934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034307692,0.00012897322,0.00024044407,0.0045974064,0.0006882478,0.003534473,0.003109114,0.00008846061,0.00006217859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10015514,0.00007423732,0.00013635671,0.09039499,0.0010108072,0.0013463909,0.0005043779,0.0005220989,0.0000808114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013563542,0.001275584,0.51662594,0.00003193009,0.00006134623,0.00006670775,0.015569455,0.023254093,0.0042301933,0.06604318,0.21091606,0.1617899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016092667,0.0029258074,0.5507294,0.000322708,0.000043041913,0.00014428853,0.04623777,0.09228921,0.0041542565,0.15887412,0.14165281,0.00101731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040330007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027555446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16077259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001503339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070490135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1799284535","doi":"10.1002/asi.23179","title":"Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal; National Research Council Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Feature (linguistics); Data set; Feature selection","score_opus":0.39575441091135916,"score_gpt":0.5121693558521234,"score_spread":0.11641494494076426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1799284535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609148,0.000044266148,0.006216339,0.03043237,0.0007477673,0.00021480584,0.000013258008,0.000016633865,0.0013997619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844146,0.000039036593,0.0004922222,0.0008606287,0.00003582837,0.000004501371,1.7181067e-7,0.0000016389365,0.00012452563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916934,0.00006554468,0.0009461751,0.0001244989,0.0068460167,0.00032437846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97644883,0.002282144,0.0026831012,0.00026586812,0.018191721,0.00012830758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05238761,0.000065477536,0.00018462694,0.026314335,0.000606007,0.0010538256,0.002258832,0.00016798117,0.0000032730584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30241236,0.000038701164,0.00007114161,0.061523765,0.00027006018,0.004691675,0.00035367176,0.00039679944,0.0000254994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000252855,0.000034687484,0.6558884,0.000011349215,0.00003444718,1.3881959e-7,0.001054266,0.00092326355,0.010798124,0.12158564,0.011244004,0.1984004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012150094,0.00027515853,0.6609027,0.000029339506,0.00002229327,0.000022148635,0.002043064,0.008722543,0.009996789,0.1416076,0.17498131,0.00018208555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002312427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016871263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25002474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003563178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035061687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820939557","doi":"10.14288/1.0107439","title":"Open Access Journals Support in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Variety (cybernetics); Open access publishing; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8874758402458053,"score_gpt":0.7070317425998818,"score_spread":0.1804440976459235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820939557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124012,0.000074693366,0.00014099981,0.007244985,0.00043979246,0.00048339576,0.00009359804,2.2226874e-7,0.17912117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689545,0.00008142535,0.00051932485,0.00021069968,0.000027101738,0.000009994834,7.9132246e-7,0.0000055543355,0.030190608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223405,0.00020278574,0.00074005645,0.0006754431,0.0055712387,0.00057640736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462163,0.0027349158,0.00025867342,0.0007763549,0.0010916647,0.00051672873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02693143,0.00009601433,0.0003141489,0.01821946,0.00012078967,0.021902898,0.025259905,0.000042396623,0.118556395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01881885,0.000049301045,0.000033619926,0.09857445,0.000045172776,0.004839952,0.0126299495,0.00012723525,0.0017269389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011500613,0.000020676274,0.3211671,1.0922238e-7,0.0000023167224,0.0000664217,0.000012823074,0.0000016652028,0.00017766141,0.000006205699,0.06670168,0.61183184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072644855,0.000032447628,0.42213753,0.000015766771,9.416238e-7,0.0000096717085,0.00018217438,0.00005000171,0.0031391801,0.0017394209,0.5718282,0.00013819388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69778335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9110837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6116936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052905164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064883074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839866796","doi":"","title":"Constructing of Innovation Teams: The Way of Academic Research Order Rebuilding","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Order (exchange); Obstacle; Subject (documents); Academic freedom; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Management; Epistemology; Economics; Higher education; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.697789209047413,"score_gpt":0.6165843998804371,"score_spread":0.08120480916697592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839866796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85127604,0.00013164667,0.00026650407,0.002355755,0.00041954566,0.00019592051,0.00002492448,0.0000042893284,0.14532536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990646,0.00000666261,0.0004248706,0.000074839925,0.00009749978,0.0000029861933,5.524845e-7,0.0000036680706,0.00032429158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98699963,0.00030108777,0.0007322364,0.00041667972,0.010742873,0.0008074902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742809,0.0021137237,0.00033795062,0.00038432135,0.022396823,0.00048625952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11355565,0.00006498188,0.00018320575,0.04270804,0.0008503033,0.00050825824,0.003960563,0.000110847606,0.000070069495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20454752,0.00004253813,0.000028861788,0.4745753,0.0043335753,0.00063091173,0.00048408651,0.0005380391,0.000023051627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006081529,0.000010116277,0.3291064,0.0000036575275,0.000003556746,0.0000021104595,0.002855879,0.0000055702194,0.0072565777,0.3269295,0.019147744,0.3146728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013771207,0.0004461303,0.14050518,0.00009218192,0.0000109416505,0.000026896541,0.42312044,0.006670374,0.05037666,0.20249969,0.17407976,0.0007946129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016782066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026318706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43186727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090074184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007708485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855391563","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n1a39","title":"Build It and They Will Come? Support for Open Access in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Joint Information Systems Committee; Australian Research Council; National Library of Australia; Times Higher Education; Medical Research Council; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Citation; Process (computing); Business; Open research; Public relations; Access to information; Political science; Knowledge management; Data science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Information access; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8706319294959223,"score_gpt":0.7148403740911772,"score_spread":0.1557915554047451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855391563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97335696,0.0030355565,0.00025569188,0.015168037,0.000109714114,0.001495058,0.00004485435,0.000008594927,0.0065255556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911496,0.0026587197,0.0015667671,0.00011210082,0.000031050735,0.00012648728,0.000015359297,0.0000084553785,0.0043314565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927099,0.0015430624,0.00052003283,0.00044572764,0.0039832313,0.0007980607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986646,0.008033487,0.0001175882,0.0013519748,0.0033145011,0.0005364594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12602675,0.00010055642,0.0002325972,0.017830515,0.0008749294,0.024898697,0.007827929,0.00015385698,0.00022754114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04290096,0.00007153801,0.000034445777,0.03259672,0.00036975084,0.018099362,0.009438637,0.0009743316,0.000051604526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008427281,0.00023114285,0.91920143,0.000014347011,0.000008721771,7.201811e-7,0.00081650255,9.55143e-7,0.00039573142,0.012781024,0.016307278,0.050157845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081886014,0.0001582582,0.7672966,0.000025115498,0.0000020375762,0.0000053401773,0.00096145447,0.0002704667,0.00023022736,0.058617312,0.17148466,0.00012965956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016667139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000690048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15517738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097731536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001524466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1855939199","doi":"","title":"A general framework for relative impact indicators","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Forestry; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3155945404928188,"score_gpt":0.5436566190987583,"score_spread":0.22806207860593947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1855939199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5316835,0.00019433674,0.44929832,0.00068050425,0.0014812788,0.00024141592,0.000059940397,0.000003094179,0.016357562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665664,0.000009695963,0.032996394,0.00028603277,0.000037980313,0.0000017910573,4.64268e-7,0.0000023565492,0.000098887016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993702,0.00007285594,0.0009198115,0.00013793827,0.004561549,0.00060583703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869667,0.0018776678,0.0009948214,0.00034576567,0.007605994,0.0022090452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035016365,0.000087861416,0.00018929229,0.092035905,0.00063998275,0.003411703,0.0021535708,0.000079567595,0.00043891542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19686435,0.000056249602,0.00017012091,0.14504787,0.0005289529,0.008894772,0.000030301004,0.0002783769,0.0000934351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002009482,0.000015873069,0.1679465,0.0000035769688,0.000021857422,0.000008172846,0.004010937,0.0014594994,0.0000665773,0.6628244,0.019501632,0.14412089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092052313,0.0008035341,0.27893123,0.00003446931,0.000009301696,0.00022271716,0.0028157458,0.004391942,0.0020064616,0.3288122,0.38066316,0.00038870168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019455254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069184025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43488288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005784467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011189793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99762285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858021180","doi":"10.15190/d.2015.42","title":"An updated h-index measures both the primary and total scientific output of a researcher","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discoveries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Occupational Cancer Research Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"Moonshot Research and Development Program; Hyundai Hope On Wheels; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Cancer Institute; Central Drug Research Institute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Vetenskapsrådet; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS; Laura and John Arnold Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; AIM at Melanoma; Centrum för idrottsforskning; AFA Försäkring; National Institutes of Health; Lady Tata Memorial Trust; Gabrielle's Angel Foundation for Cancer Research; Kansas Bioscience Authority; National Health and Medical Research Council; Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment; RWTH Aachen University; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation; Hope Foundation; Barncancerfonden; RGK Foundation; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Medical Research Council","keywords":"Index (typography); Value (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Position (finance); Minor (academic); Library science; Operations research; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.5557367665381472,"score_gpt":0.5299322736010783,"score_spread":0.02580449293706888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858021180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991291,0.0010128116,0.0013924865,0.0007151877,0.00030922485,0.00019631196,0.00007615923,0.000013108951,0.004993705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943879,0.000017613058,0.0001278485,0.00004195663,0.00003827925,0.0000060730636,0.000012876945,0.000008063418,0.0053593447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888914,0.0004246732,0.00040580664,0.0005574404,0.009294014,0.00042661812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955103,0.0007347654,0.0001407984,0.0009788981,0.0022402895,0.000394942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025308454,0.000113377886,0.00024254074,0.010214791,0.0003416755,0.0048879366,0.0016451712,0.00006204882,0.00010085067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010752916,0.000058253972,0.000064812295,0.05179155,0.0013791911,0.0013840818,0.0008009729,0.00018520647,0.000028520446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005819956,0.0005695184,0.56883514,0.000015183418,0.00006375378,0.00002182281,0.0069352696,0.00024146703,0.010485978,0.0075925468,0.18460646,0.22005087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081998715,0.00048255513,0.89425963,0.000007825853,0.000007981564,0.000013918509,0.012533215,0.0047411253,0.0029684866,0.015715698,0.06819717,0.00025238618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033235148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010725704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32542452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051657866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006468849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859296017","doi":"10.1186/1471-2458-6-301","title":"A bibliometric analysis in the fields of preventive medicine, occupational and environmental medicine, epidemiology, and public health","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Biostatistics; Epidemiology; Medicine; Preventive healthcare; Environmental medicine; Environmental epidemiology; Environmental health; Bibliometrics; Occupational medicine; Population; Family medicine; Library science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5681965202413667,"score_gpt":0.575281995445556,"score_spread":0.00708547520418934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859296017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.832119,0.022800308,0.040529143,0.10242229,0.00013630016,0.00066496857,0.0001253394,0.0000117620875,0.001190918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332935,0.0028998505,0.0009440565,0.0024789681,0.00010109695,0.000021871996,0.00008669411,0.0000054548586,0.0001326834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849613,0.004650559,0.0025727216,0.0009934698,0.0055896477,0.0012323413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731256,0.02392163,0.0011076037,0.0006741067,0.00040878417,0.00076230825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1320133,0.00018461826,0.0009974277,0.505332,0.00031306173,0.00021902959,0.0011563112,0.0001317246,0.0003684885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055936996,0.00010144147,0.00010516129,0.710571,0.0010441912,0.0004971984,0.00032277554,0.00034479366,0.0000039985252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004810743,0.0001658453,0.8950847,0.000018410303,0.000020907393,6.2568347e-7,0.00043538518,0.000006507757,8.5792584e-7,0.003511562,0.016887551,0.08386283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006068487,0.00044526058,0.9790449,0.000007198271,0.0000063394855,0.000008834256,0.00270815,0.003997907,1.261855e-7,0.0044030724,0.008692787,0.00007855061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012896754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002666965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20523901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002059156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009180653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936764},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1860877490","doi":"10.18438/b84c8t","title":"Positive Perceptions of Access to Online Library Resources Correlates with Quality and Quantity of Scholarly Publications among Finnish Academics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Scale (ratio); Productivity; Library science; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.4063210639355647,"score_gpt":0.5072887019207899,"score_spread":0.10096763798522518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860877490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487922,0.00039962324,0.0044844733,0.044142567,0.000030043631,0.00033816483,0.00025582672,0.000032815835,0.00152425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97982293,0.0030228284,0.00975527,0.0071062213,0.00001752303,0.00001036031,0.000051389063,0.000005541176,0.00020795291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561983,0.0004998306,0.0009993156,0.0002814511,0.0024117993,0.00018777339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98167676,0.014992936,0.0010420716,0.00044946326,0.0014836532,0.00035512762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042954935,0.00011513867,0.0002479013,0.0111014005,0.00035461292,0.003350325,0.001106508,0.00013011265,0.00024585542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052048624,0.000084202315,0.000041607327,0.04328712,0.00044612127,0.42460358,0.00070080644,0.000448377,0.00000984783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002975988,0.00010163683,0.98139715,0.000028547189,0.000011074959,6.2098434e-7,0.0005579744,0.00013192896,0.00006235573,0.008706117,0.0033418378,0.0053631538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021121303,0.0002646944,0.98244256,0.00010355693,0.000009116919,0.00001106015,0.0015595887,0.001843185,0.0006014268,0.00015920158,0.012683382,0.00011100734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056266257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.466202e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42125326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007353475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003935687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866505218","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.472","title":"University Supports for Open Access: A Canadian National Survey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Public relations; Work (physics); Administration (probate law); Scholarly communication; Business; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.6509815452259886,"score_gpt":0.6130331619322521,"score_spread":0.03794838329373651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866505218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847767,0.0006341057,0.00027220012,0.030977827,0.021260949,0.0008944222,0.0011477687,0.000003929555,0.060032062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655869,0.000004203478,0.00060933793,0.0007773434,0.0002681468,0.0000012790168,0.000026234911,0.000006338078,0.03272021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737674,0.00012722777,0.0003602782,0.00022810031,0.0015128916,0.0003947413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98453414,0.0011547621,0.00033034894,0.00024940012,0.011290802,0.002440551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013911652,0.00007255465,0.00015533608,0.037563022,0.00039488735,0.004573797,0.0045874156,0.000097076496,0.00508156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013253751,0.00006254968,0.00007343566,0.0326622,0.00008435173,0.0020043463,0.000085790554,0.0002498268,0.000046018344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053783992,0.000015114049,0.38726813,6.0193304e-7,0.0000058265855,0.000004205745,0.000027932681,0.0000029293324,0.0000093053495,0.0021267654,0.6053414,0.00519248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096581585,0.000017609123,0.4920834,0.000001599886,0.000001779074,0.000009258195,0.00003623212,0.000007805286,0.000008490636,0.005330879,0.5023623,0.000044040324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59970963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9376925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33798292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006490822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056563906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99645954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867326801","doi":"","title":"The Growth of Open Access Across Canadian Universities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.2949421788986292,"score_gpt":0.4187112687067069,"score_spread":0.12376908980807766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867326801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40957263,0.00010161406,0.00016994214,0.0031905053,0.00027986243,0.0005719495,0.0014061274,0.000075408825,0.584632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8057522,0.00012175378,0.00010134746,0.00009257697,0.000022496946,9.230535e-8,0.00003675963,0.000013129944,0.19385964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560064,0.00023314724,0.00030201083,0.00072925264,0.002161369,0.0009735889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395,0.0025215708,0.00032711853,0.00094418693,0.0010862355,0.0011709003],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008242825,0.00023734335,0.00036401337,0.01689543,0.0018014645,0.018062105,0.021193488,0.0001742756,0.0012306703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006184888,0.00019660614,0.00025725612,0.09997865,0.0010053684,0.025333783,0.009949888,0.00031751487,0.0005608084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023437488,0.00015954644,0.36844906,0.000011517629,0.00015284831,0.00029075722,0.00053878734,0.00004615483,0.00000981998,0.12522827,0.48016262,0.024716228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000694286,0.000101349055,0.061850026,0.000015676576,0.00001051989,0.000004131553,0.04137574,0.00015460477,0.000096307485,0.0041399207,0.89121634,0.00034112242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04743122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055392766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4110537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004064931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020511637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867868077","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0133061","title":"How to Receive More Funding for Your Research? Get Connected to the Right People!","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Work (physics); Control (management); Business; Public relations; Carry (investment); Marketing; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.8633871682852079,"score_gpt":0.5859746604823046,"score_spread":0.2774125078029033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867868077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8601016,0.00026105123,0.0040426236,0.12969445,0.00031950496,0.0020403399,0.00014702535,0.000043566743,0.0033498905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619852,0.000026216092,0.008450357,0.0006910766,0.00048376905,0.00028125857,0.000008881354,0.000024941193,0.028048312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818622,0.0004570921,0.00040625848,0.00089050987,0.015197048,0.0011868754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97031903,0.011593095,0.00011412764,0.0013461976,0.0150003685,0.001627155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042153664,0.00014983381,0.00038634386,0.03837696,0.0006282818,0.0050464994,0.0038259365,0.0001043066,0.00014784213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30646396,0.00008553464,0.000093860675,0.19883214,0.00010266068,0.0004357299,0.0013227079,0.00037763503,0.001169976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036754296,0.0011425031,0.02370629,0.00002214154,0.00013682454,0.00001667289,0.006774767,0.0000507988,0.012902058,0.002984261,0.930614,0.02128215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00272541,0.0043454412,0.09129444,0.0001647026,0.000060225786,0.000008314775,0.02885533,0.020796759,0.04543486,0.03536111,0.7698617,0.0010917118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009646038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003139679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027978426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031250095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868352903","doi":"10.18438/b8hc87","title":"Traditional Factors of Fit, Perceived Quality, and Speed of Publication Still Outweigh Open Access in Authors’ Journal Selection Criteria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Open access publishing; Computer science; Subject (documents); Library science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.7409162391392192,"score_gpt":0.6064956897708872,"score_spread":0.13442054936833203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868352903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743605,0.00027871373,0.0019577795,0.019878492,0.00025404664,0.00034380818,0.000058583806,0.000008556966,0.00285951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954461,0.0005677841,0.0023413592,0.001504151,0.000038179343,0.0000035072949,0.000022767013,0.0000029543628,0.000073236035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952924,0.00087806897,0.0012094178,0.00015781587,0.002254267,0.0002080243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865767,0.010257267,0.0013603731,0.00019092382,0.0012978002,0.00031697212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01860041,0.000092780996,0.0002258395,0.012826717,0.0001403381,0.006255658,0.0011456483,0.000089309186,0.0012982857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07526969,0.000069073554,0.000036894682,0.024296576,0.000108460976,0.43554592,0.0005079499,0.00025960093,0.0000057804523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000656476,0.00039595822,0.91154546,0.00010108721,0.000018128487,3.339917e-7,0.0017145532,0.000067385154,0.0010261781,0.04607405,0.009012857,0.029387549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003576679,0.00013167472,0.9756963,0.00005389116,0.0000059087365,0.000012232662,0.0009457427,0.004497425,0.0013361966,0.00093861634,0.015938556,0.00008575361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005583259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4550868e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42929026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002374395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003396884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961466},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1869963300","doi":"10.1111/brv.12185","title":"The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Rigour; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Peer review; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Preprint; Scientific literature; Technical peer review; Computer science; Publishing; Scientific progress; Selection (genetic algorithm); Management science; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Engineering; Business; Epistemology; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8049729065057509,"score_gpt":0.5806009134012404,"score_spread":0.2243719931045105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1869963300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008559043,0.9680913,0.001272238,0.017550541,0.0014041452,0.009712503,0.0007639078,0.000040928157,0.001155891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000060391078,0.99182355,0.0015040706,0.00052076485,0.00091943267,0.0023842044,0.00025547034,0.000031918178,0.0025001953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722083,0.007393634,0.007879793,0.0027094998,0.008513741,0.0012949968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464742,0.017389862,0.009299473,0.0037933586,0.021967815,0.0010752985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16490985,0.0011005981,0.0073079737,0.0015266759,0.0015070388,0.000877294,0.009639947,0.0014204391,0.0003127207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50802827,0.00038812726,0.01098279,0.072309434,0.0034216219,0.00030076024,0.0033946538,0.0017544366,0.00031193308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022641221,0.00030628996,0.000056085446,0.004377872,0.00009541142,1.3761323e-7,0.0000040205405,4.0151542e-7,0.0000085896445,0.010014183,0.23776712,0.74734724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001620281,0.00044169763,0.00014418214,0.006472176,0.00037594207,0.00002476141,0.000008274625,0.000055914705,0.0000022007632,0.011710442,0.98012257,0.00047981957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018482378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002191149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014328156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018975412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875784764","doi":"10.7202/1032813ar","title":"L’agrément des programmes de maîtrise en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l’information : une marque d’excellence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Excellence; Art","score_opus":0.3656115826860087,"score_gpt":0.5600560374136674,"score_spread":0.1944444547276587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875784764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46053135,0.057776265,0.2961892,0.08896947,0.0027106933,0.002965256,0.0003635694,0.00041241056,0.09008178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7484124,0.122614995,0.105360925,0.0056829527,0.00033579947,0.00031026438,0.00009391604,0.00005663003,0.017132148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694646,0.0025828443,0.0014942457,0.0009091171,0.0063188905,0.0017484281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881585,0.005952091,0.00075809617,0.00060039124,0.0030863367,0.0014445392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06542876,0.00047092125,0.0004992223,0.18519841,0.00069756515,0.056917366,0.0024821204,0.00034923368,0.0042621703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017933834,0.00041080522,0.00024560044,0.36059076,0.0015100983,0.044120073,0.0008214326,0.0005520535,0.001258526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018969837,0.0008847378,0.16458361,0.00020960816,0.000101278216,0.000044460092,0.022273459,0.006067738,0.0005524185,0.098397695,0.22573099,0.4809643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032096242,0.0027239546,0.0394245,0.00035599875,0.00007503341,0.00015553509,0.025808439,0.03457917,0.008326212,0.24154046,0.6425792,0.0012219065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012856607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005492347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4797424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017886899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049664234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877474545","doi":"10.1002/meet.14505001013","title":"Altmetrics: Present and future – panel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Scientometrics; Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16990887895704138,"score_gpt":0.44352388282780614,"score_spread":0.27361500387076476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877474545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677287,0.0001546674,0.00015843699,0.029509725,0.00010167236,0.0005809017,0.000011482719,0.000030304589,0.0017241578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921757,0.0006019248,0.0063998187,0.00061215,0.00004871157,0.00006482815,2.3142017e-7,0.0000029530338,0.000093665796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955356,0.0000025244187,0.00044438482,0.0002838663,0.003299702,0.00043390229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98856807,0.000390825,0.0007268868,0.00021596695,0.009945495,0.00015275672],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076150834,0.000094536816,0.00022182558,0.011207262,0.0005478982,0.001307018,0.001948634,0.00006671961,0.000006513525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567195,0.000053120722,0.00009127298,0.14812464,0.0037030315,0.0035615475,0.0011458211,0.00015105028,0.0000080519185],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034980096,0.000014917244,0.03393046,0.000016901362,0.000008983267,3.7264667e-9,0.00047208637,2.3487148e-7,0.004173653,0.016902855,0.030102685,0.9143737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000727171,0.0006444684,0.21739988,0.000010713321,0.000017587196,0.00003031298,0.0740789,0.018306082,0.017100438,0.058424912,0.61290514,0.00035437057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003965014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.0839492e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91401935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005472876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014029218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878144120","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1502280112","title":"The incidence and role of negative citations in science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quality (philosophy); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Point (geometry); Data science; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.485203514959724,"score_gpt":0.5552463451501192,"score_spread":0.07004283019039514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878144120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846978,0.00045952757,0.0000017216031,0.003055482,0.00002338296,0.00014904182,0.0000070314163,0.0000017262845,0.011604241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857336,0.00006168572,0.001212995,0.00004082778,0.000011844124,0.00000486025,5.120738e-9,0.0000010935829,0.00009332771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701215,0.000023516359,0.0005812701,0.00032993872,0.011821629,0.0002314822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98811907,0.0045372345,0.00077292183,0.000025526737,0.0064153853,0.00012985665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.047744658,0.0000597417,0.00014502442,0.0098880725,0.00038868777,0.00034826624,0.0038457054,0.00004011564,0.0000032926232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12580076,0.000028849012,0.000037625814,0.11203914,0.00610601,0.0014349669,0.00088739395,0.00015862282,0.0000013831519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027769085,0.000076056596,0.4907479,0.000007761886,0.000004460639,6.8592594e-9,0.0022934524,0.0002332688,0.14357546,0.34690145,0.000834408,0.015298009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009996649,0.00004394784,0.4630331,0.000015288184,8.604987e-7,0.0000016971608,0.0034287851,0.0059071835,0.06324305,0.46409357,0.00010070801,0.000031835378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048480604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011628248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11719213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005937406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003418047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881690606","doi":"10.1161/circulationaha.115.019564","title":"Results-Based Accountability for Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Circulation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Accountability; Epidemiology; Population; Gerontology; Library science; Political science; Internal medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.8184942742197815,"score_gpt":0.6221330884603833,"score_spread":0.1963611857593982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881690606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014700793,0.018847445,0.022886137,0.9325979,0.0018235965,0.004075019,0.0025591855,0.000059299455,0.0024506487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7104743,0.000250575,0.0031545165,0.26816997,0.009866252,0.0011586724,0.0044364776,0.00012454648,0.0023646776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97854453,0.0032126894,0.0012486919,0.0016960701,0.014398747,0.00089924043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94421035,0.038444255,0.00035954197,0.0013893608,0.015377679,0.00021882862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22143456,0.00024444162,0.000716599,0.016981766,0.0007705087,0.0012142817,0.0017958508,0.0009482122,0.000028321532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2765947,0.00015691278,0.000572142,0.04001951,0.0009922341,0.00048031504,0.0003735485,0.0016685425,0.000048816222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024159928,0.000029928338,0.008941122,0.000027152555,0.000092908136,0.0000015342478,0.000021943059,0.0008162995,0.000013722348,0.00008966634,0.9868217,0.003119843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086443906,0.000048514175,0.015134561,0.000009455352,0.000041719555,0.000010251137,0.000012450247,0.020330016,0.000008382691,0.023436254,0.93992555,0.00017840811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043856178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014224228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69577354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051851297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012357138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895862922","doi":"10.71781/13871","title":"Les fonctions des citations dans les articles d'information scientifique de périodiques québécois (2001 - 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4962446165082692,"score_gpt":0.5460042287327821,"score_spread":0.04975961222451292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895862922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80984783,0.0011890231,0.03528387,0.0008265429,0.0010264431,0.001193422,0.00046176265,0.000009610599,0.1501615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80494714,0.0019840258,0.09546601,0.00013960118,0.00023532088,0.00019873856,0.001130004,0.000043978765,0.095855206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990847,0.0006423944,0.0016164882,0.0010048059,0.0045540347,0.0013353059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877123,0.0024760282,0.0008336619,0.0008619408,0.0072042197,0.0009118266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01643612,0.00045368558,0.00054388447,0.03440813,0.003372488,0.01894881,0.0040007173,0.00059981976,0.011611788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025958208,0.00040504028,0.00031172947,0.09008167,0.00074563146,0.005547002,0.00035616593,0.0006673237,0.0030033865],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044126118,0.00038427697,0.023011722,0.000026043379,0.00003865518,0.000009897731,0.02006965,0.000410408,0.0023960546,0.0005418826,0.007099496,0.9459678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078406226,0.00042998572,0.47959986,0.00042157696,0.00013659148,0.000041459196,0.08857115,0.013456333,0.03123846,0.008498456,0.37584817,0.0009738812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09862629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20857224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001094337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003776609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900908307","doi":"10.1002/asi.23568","title":"Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (<scp>LIS</scp>): Authors, institutions, and network structures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Scientometrics; Library science; Subject (documents); Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Information science; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.1273797801228862,"score_gpt":0.42389375027810616,"score_spread":0.29651397015521996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900908307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804832,0.00027073594,0.00033450016,0.009783503,0.0009999023,0.00034703943,0.000019354457,0.000022164968,0.0077396375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976536,0.00037996427,0.001403524,0.0004631931,0.000029315479,0.000003871892,0.0000011583518,0.0000014671002,0.00006389195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943466,0.000049366197,0.0008564929,0.00014343984,0.0042190924,0.00038496355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354684,0.00089779514,0.0013370104,0.0002010941,0.003777463,0.00023978132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024103938,0.00008681597,0.00019992607,0.031535465,0.0007177964,0.0028914006,0.0013099958,0.00015952693,9.055755e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09316851,0.00005302792,0.000027589547,0.09748121,0.00093664293,0.030292775,0.0006679269,0.0002970829,0.0000021730878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018166114,0.000016259175,0.4998585,0.000008881972,0.00000962177,3.3959512e-7,0.0014234676,0.00052607275,0.00031415888,0.3900195,0.007096285,0.10070872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012270034,0.00020877575,0.50312644,0.000020087053,0.000008623496,0.000053130305,0.0041195997,0.0068115923,0.0008812246,0.05267547,0.43078482,0.00008320706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036032295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016927869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42368856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023023401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013286003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902632898","doi":"10.1353/ils.2015.0002","title":"Studying the Publication Pattern of Canadian Computer Scientists / Étude des pratiques de publication des scientifiques canadiens en informatique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2445099569026439,"score_gpt":0.40792096221470864,"score_spread":0.16341100531206473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902632898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401808,0.002787736,0.014861293,0.025607886,0.0018352031,0.00053462316,0.00027158874,0.00001200678,0.013908883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683053,0.00056726456,0.00960905,0.0021642526,0.00010507734,0.0000043705195,0.000017609986,0.0000067806113,0.00069503754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939919,0.0003838172,0.0014885169,0.00022484855,0.0028537598,0.0010571291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98114175,0.00057966926,0.0011043438,0.00043906915,0.011847645,0.0048875413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03364341,0.00018027372,0.0002559288,0.06707265,0.0015236101,0.01626109,0.0034639651,0.00013821457,0.00024771522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018523548,0.00012992602,0.00007729925,0.092985995,0.004054749,0.04076381,0.00027170248,0.00042001324,0.0000346812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000509406,0.000020607813,0.21538554,0.000067567555,0.000016362472,0.0000073650217,0.09396918,0.00023637424,0.000013007931,0.010736078,0.071729414,0.6078134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038725318,0.00035405275,0.54731625,0.0002356415,0.000012090002,0.00039645183,0.014254071,0.038906146,0.0005808849,0.0023097296,0.3949813,0.00026611873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37056652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47656515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6075473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010390863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04564246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903266278","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v3i1.54","title":"Open Access to Research. Changing Researcher Behavior Through University and Funder Mandates.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Publish or perish; Order (exchange); Computer science; Political science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Open science; Business; World Wide Web; Publishing; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9088351936069975,"score_gpt":0.6643610912524123,"score_spread":0.24447410235458522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903266278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194308,0.00043680595,0.0011958926,0.0101680625,0.0002729027,0.0022648324,0.00017493668,0.0000053357044,0.16605037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96919566,0.0014088576,0.0031469832,0.000495916,0.000044895853,0.0000114344075,0.000001216347,0.000016521375,0.025678506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887709,0.00059040403,0.00059392076,0.00086270814,0.008331152,0.00085090025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948934,0.0019878892,0.00032451187,0.00068897725,0.0013393693,0.0007658578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034889948,0.00016405545,0.00047259708,0.0059199072,0.0008814982,0.008212751,0.009660737,0.000101158425,0.0027753923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003710955,0.00012285504,0.000067127556,0.031497117,0.0002778994,0.006022451,0.033336535,0.0005196099,0.000063470776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016636968,0.0011153268,0.5430528,0.000031341842,0.00012382191,0.00034975572,0.0033220656,0.000005130519,0.0010788678,0.01178982,0.14487731,0.29259008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018964997,0.0009930055,0.63898,0.00011114353,0.000024642539,0.000037555725,0.017047375,0.00020140543,0.0030816512,0.013421818,0.3238422,0.00036274735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019536547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016410832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29222733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003252364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000281629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905893694","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12294","title":"A New Method for Identifying Recombinations of Existing Knowledge Associated with High‐Impact Innovation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Army Research Laboratory","keywords":"Computer science; Variance (accounting); Work (physics); Data science; Field (mathematics); Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.80167535965227,"score_gpt":0.6487605366471354,"score_spread":0.1529148230051346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905893694","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22968918,0.00013173562,0.7644355,0.0017769826,0.0008016227,0.0005900085,0.000011195224,0.000011299793,0.0025524236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76627153,0.000008223081,0.22892858,0.000041777806,0.000199589,0.000008568986,0.00002403568,0.000011239422,0.004506478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930206,0.00022228279,0.0019206582,0.0003119818,0.004258059,0.0002664209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95210737,0.0015348335,0.0036684126,0.00036554076,0.04220467,0.00011919521],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05903643,0.00012778646,0.0003714388,0.051349815,0.00012022278,0.00067819,0.00087059406,0.00004522709,0.000045985194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057255976,0.00007904222,0.00007411966,0.23831888,0.00002539932,0.001070647,0.00019068255,0.00019325635,0.000004637896],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019140878,0.00055437395,0.008434079,0.00004498632,0.0003754136,0.0000052106925,0.0004957368,0.0015173459,0.003984269,0.08883221,0.098464884,0.79710007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0122442,0.0044544986,0.3911793,0.0005806671,0.00027068588,0.000048288835,0.0035277542,0.010452356,0.024451906,0.48459768,0.06734634,0.000846336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020197827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005701422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79625374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043873405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050370727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908469110","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01645.x","title":"Distortions, belief and sense making in complex adaptive systems for health","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Complex adaptive system; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8609314448727596,"score_gpt":0.7424440290769706,"score_spread":0.11848741579578903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908469110","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013755847,0.020162674,0.017922865,0.0056632273,0.94989014,0.0023548317,0.00022170864,0.000005765178,0.0024032122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16536744,0.037973464,0.04044145,0.0011747371,0.75396353,0.00013820046,0.000078519864,0.00010653271,0.00075610407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95594573,0.010462316,0.00919874,0.00097279047,0.022817614,0.000602814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54163295,0.399052,0.017048156,0.0008674321,0.040742364,0.0006570628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43190277,0.00019417514,0.0012229596,0.026355557,0.00015244131,0.0010732609,0.000788231,0.0006265693,0.00007089087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8222732,0.00014538951,0.0002562209,0.02388219,0.00015574881,0.0013454178,0.00026632842,0.0023437932,0.000016333635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090236,0.0005190789,0.0014186108,0.000028390674,0.00003882021,0.000025331947,0.00016517314,0.00023699243,1.855503e-7,0.00017136926,0.95578545,0.040708262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025825943,0.0018126516,0.021977276,0.00024540318,0.00006390625,0.000033554657,0.0008953191,0.026228081,3.1421017e-8,0.0042597866,0.9417383,0.00016310804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025414527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016476793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41431275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009356161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037394096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917016740","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.015","title":"Endorsing and implementing reporting guidelines in journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Political science","score_opus":0.9235592772261059,"score_gpt":0.7493002681286454,"score_spread":0.1742590090974605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917016740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032232486,0.058900062,0.0004749466,0.89751667,0.00870507,0.000113420734,0.000019167253,0.000006772716,0.0020314285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3964971,0.049260978,0.062773734,0.3827104,0.09516394,0.000017224085,0.000028682167,0.00030058916,0.013247352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977355,0.0003570463,0.0063094404,0.0004552282,0.014925431,0.00059786637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464016,0.004459364,0.0105692465,0.00025011983,0.03816407,0.00015561632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06740875,0.00024409528,0.0010192675,0.05414913,0.00015659162,0.0026044536,0.0019688539,0.00020783926,0.000035997593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26506543,0.0001667878,0.00033302058,0.014238484,0.0002283039,0.0008242732,0.0006112543,0.0016722584,0.0000045342886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012471624,0.000019349438,0.012415663,0.0000038419207,0.00020374394,0.0015235296,0.00062302605,0.000020379906,0.000041161693,0.0000053206063,0.7077839,0.27734762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012017805,0.00019541862,0.0080322595,0.0037674392,0.000080978745,0.00451027,0.007864273,0.00045159878,0.00009310176,0.060084388,0.9133079,0.00041059114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030370014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073580813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5148063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089709566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000431489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920686816","doi":"10.18438/b8vk58","title":"The Majority of High-Impact Science Journals Would Accept Manuscripts Derived from Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling frame; Library science; Web of science; Phone; Impact factor; Population; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE; Environmental health","score_opus":0.520167877726737,"score_gpt":0.5899624590950734,"score_spread":0.06979458136833638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920686816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92555964,0.004200156,0.0056058243,0.059982426,0.00026994772,0.00057284796,0.000051261613,0.00002030098,0.0037376173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99140865,0.0038230892,0.0015105222,0.0031205215,0.00002472057,0.000014224504,0.0000066497873,0.0000036197468,0.00008802156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428564,0.0004989027,0.00075868843,0.00029265144,0.003775696,0.00038842583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750528,0.020454796,0.0010128783,0.00061861885,0.0023280364,0.0005329073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018905096,0.00012341143,0.00020684248,0.0064163734,0.0008373276,0.0352636,0.004425559,0.000078447694,0.00025578056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1504342,0.000068719935,0.000034638157,0.04728787,0.00045046548,0.43120983,0.0019581022,0.00043197142,0.000023326464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032368496,0.00029874957,0.2077555,0.000029001107,0.000104051745,0.0000067191218,0.0019075185,0.00070252863,0.001709949,0.20967211,0.019459039,0.55511796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005407677,0.00031247438,0.9164378,0.000060963837,0.000018207724,0.000009716584,0.0036249834,0.00692138,0.00793906,0.021067947,0.042902313,0.00016440681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054831966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021634664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040252628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021986838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9729625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923296844","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v34i1.183446","title":"Assessing Outcomes of Long-Term Research Collaboration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6487901424752449,"score_gpt":0.6671789705501356,"score_spread":0.01838882807489073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923296844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854728,0.0026650308,0.00027166976,0.0061518406,0.0025822173,0.00010634602,0.000005066415,0.0000013008279,0.0027437045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951747,0.000022924858,0.0007633232,0.00010229735,0.00019883788,0.0000016853327,0.000001980449,0.0000070007673,0.0037272675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420154,0.0002561631,0.00076817116,0.00019116489,0.0042057824,0.00037717147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98399365,0.0009684956,0.00049020746,0.0003507562,0.013354531,0.0008423361],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01272703,0.00007274639,0.00022765837,0.049119912,0.00024877102,0.0023189064,0.0011551484,0.000087243454,0.00066200143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010031469,0.000053327734,0.00008472872,0.071758784,0.00019223409,0.0015076422,0.00003129056,0.00029741882,0.00005201119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046117757,0.00009789292,0.95150304,0.0000052638366,0.000013449378,0.000016025737,0.00037902402,0.00006964875,0.0004156772,0.002084869,0.014806788,0.03060369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021309196,0.00009202684,0.9790938,0.000029872599,0.000004430972,0.000013763071,0.00074180844,0.0000012877549,0.0010264673,0.010969671,0.0077577736,0.00005601522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021383977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030664047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030547675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077497563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015865117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924001847","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v37i1.183544","title":"Predicting Individual Research Productivity: More than a Question of Time","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Exploratory research; Perception; Socialization; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Higher education; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Economics; Business; Economic growth","score_opus":0.5048919024519153,"score_gpt":0.5947720797289903,"score_spread":0.08988017727707498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924001847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897729,0.0023458016,0.000085955624,0.002902442,0.0015867258,0.00014801414,0.000012839531,0.0000023799653,0.003142943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890622,0.000008228073,0.00054668245,0.000038502523,0.00071621756,0.0000013023595,0.0000029757007,0.00000846703,0.009615411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240434,0.00036942767,0.0007754993,0.0002570778,0.0056513376,0.000542301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864455,0.0017031515,0.0005349555,0.00037992827,0.009895545,0.0010409403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059399266,0.00007815284,0.00020306137,0.05962473,0.00023676708,0.00063793483,0.0012581439,0.00010344539,0.0004957972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021907587,0.000060598188,0.00008044498,0.06401928,0.00026440216,0.0007214285,0.00005692961,0.00048922654,0.000046775363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017148479,0.000102927064,0.877196,0.000006186025,0.000016329774,0.000010780272,0.0009974258,0.00001367314,0.0011734925,0.0004903804,0.051559705,0.068415925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111819296,0.00019279472,0.9457817,0.000041974145,0.0000067751685,0.000040474908,0.00080891023,0.000016861713,0.0014613997,0.00482412,0.04664916,0.0000640197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052162143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021792992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06858566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003964653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00603849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924177084","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05112.x","title":"Scientific productivity of OECD countries in dermatology journals within the last 10‐year period","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Productivity; Medicine; Population; Index (typography); Demography; Bibliometrics; Geography; Library science; Economic growth; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.3084683078737993,"score_gpt":0.5300698606143887,"score_spread":0.22160155274058935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924177084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97113246,0.0022988024,0.00063956203,0.020607132,0.0044256723,0.000095515665,0.000012986648,0.0000028882507,0.0007849761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.000067533256,0.00038999182,0.00006698769,0.00019220615,0.0000020744994,8.2307156e-7,0.0000064944547,0.00020618083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908967,0.00074112363,0.0017201393,0.000238594,0.005950164,0.00045327636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881112,0.0025979318,0.0016295876,0.00036231327,0.0070953034,0.00020366676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010765255,0.00012482509,0.00048448308,0.02346333,0.00014882804,0.00091356394,0.003155632,0.00012086906,0.00083701976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021384913,0.00007282487,0.00018176704,0.01246862,0.0008814928,0.0013953692,0.0004804052,0.0005021231,0.00018023813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012445472,0.0002879439,0.98092586,0.000005146371,0.00006889809,0.0002647482,0.001257816,0.000047959093,0.0012070297,0.005843012,0.007612986,0.0023541362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028512585,0.00015874876,0.70490295,0.00008299473,0.000033474087,0.08514581,0.005561709,0.00091235735,0.046325635,0.022461548,0.13118258,0.0003809467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000787193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037438742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27602294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010322476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000556099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98760486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931366832","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.478","title":"International Development and Research Capacities: Increasing Access to African Scholarly Publishing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Promotion (chess); Political science; Electronic publishing; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.6028846712778199,"score_gpt":0.5822783616696274,"score_spread":0.02060630960819243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931366832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94849217,0.00035230577,0.00006582373,0.02190259,0.0045415955,0.000092566144,0.0000063489288,0.0000019461966,0.024544662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923147,0.0000056357458,0.0051045064,0.0005613955,0.0006715444,0.000004748562,0.0000017543305,0.0000076290153,0.0044112997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939528,0.000232788,0.0005625391,0.00026963875,0.004530005,0.0004522253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98036844,0.0016193908,0.00023581155,0.00028388284,0.0152687915,0.0022236744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031506736,0.00007619416,0.00013437339,0.067525856,0.00049053476,0.043314014,0.0029657546,0.000097140706,0.0012595346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06193777,0.000060666138,0.000031897318,0.0385361,0.00017608129,0.0092207,0.00020024211,0.0010167579,0.00003773663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015528894,0.000042204316,0.5215198,0.0000028572172,0.000016535569,0.000012874598,0.0036753283,0.0000025162233,0.0010773356,0.0024787902,0.18708861,0.28406766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055864402,0.000016769867,0.42264247,0.0000114922605,7.4652723e-7,0.000030500618,0.0012596598,0.0000030123854,0.00017837924,0.0023988083,0.57335424,0.00004802965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009145735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072783823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38626567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005148815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008427002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1931854307","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.cs/0606079","title":"Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Scholarly communication; Discipline; Confounding; Bibliometrics; Metadata; Citation analysis; Causality (physics); Impact factor; Psychology; Library science; Demography; Social science; Statistics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Publishing; World Wide Web; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.8493212517455527,"score_gpt":0.7002375862259894,"score_spread":0.1490836655195633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1931854307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99093103,0.0008635215,0.00009528532,0.002332716,0.00027804365,0.0010155607,0.00031725934,0.0000081248045,0.0041584573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978566,0.00022120395,0.00020068073,0.000014458731,0.00009990615,0.00003481055,0.000028291734,0.000021079735,0.0015229328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852386,0.001358736,0.0011193629,0.0012516369,0.010351274,0.0006803842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97763664,0.009442142,0.0011849566,0.0018683817,0.009563747,0.00030411192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033583436,0.00026897303,0.0008725627,0.030278048,0.0005271746,0.008600206,0.013843198,0.00034601832,0.00026724546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055646922,0.00015488765,0.0002942861,0.098113574,0.0013605906,0.0015699902,0.037346046,0.0011484902,0.000024949597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009043006,0.00031813935,0.95468384,0.00008489942,0.00003318713,0.0000022054269,0.00014768828,0.00011480991,0.0004564121,0.000090439746,0.042794615,0.0011833075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004098031,0.00018252246,0.98548293,0.00013437266,0.0000115207395,0.0000013050959,0.00036998998,0.0011120014,0.0029183552,0.009074198,0.00013560883,0.00016736616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077295722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026241253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067835525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018617652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010533688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937491128","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v9i2.3115","title":"The Adoption of Open Access Funds Among Canadian Academic Research Libraries, 2008-2012","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Business; Service (business); Institution; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Marketing; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6852905379186385,"score_gpt":0.6025800342344214,"score_spread":0.08271050368421706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937491128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20017146,0.012633064,0.000112983456,0.39858532,0.00070511416,0.001346845,0.000055284683,0.000006846842,0.3863831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989669,0.0058581294,0.00008934631,0.0010622801,0.00018864879,0.000009779024,0.0000067444294,0.000007958259,0.0031081117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98897344,0.0038526831,0.0010609042,0.00018873345,0.0049578235,0.000966416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635417,0.02857125,0.00069783087,0.0005986223,0.0041411095,0.0024494843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11765581,0.00010540287,0.00021962675,0.0242253,0.0035714936,0.031155087,0.0063919867,0.00020468431,0.00026464814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07023038,0.000054647284,0.000049293354,0.04254307,0.0018512714,0.0982386,0.0011968979,0.0023299693,0.000042420714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028543154,0.000013070566,0.09427808,0.000026471762,0.000044550816,0.000009816021,0.0026150225,0.00003533248,0.0000037188966,0.3401416,0.4185578,0.14398912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023315602,0.00020364638,0.09304958,0.000032153126,0.0000045700567,0.0000427795,0.006156649,0.00077210827,0.000061152816,0.020361137,0.87901366,0.000069393216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038834497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030518143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78949755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007046188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078061777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941175482","doi":"10.1002/asi.23418","title":"Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency‐weighted in‐text citation counting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Weighting; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Citation analysis; Citation impact; Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Statistics; Scheme (mathematics); Mathematics; Data science; Library science; Combinatorics; Physics","score_opus":0.36826216302652676,"score_gpt":0.492080593318006,"score_spread":0.12381843029147926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941175482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97971344,0.00015134098,0.0017009008,0.017337736,0.000416501,0.00016871505,0.00001987696,0.0000062765516,0.00048521277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776316,0.00008585454,0.0020068532,0.00007488667,0.000012463387,0.000003389838,0.0000012972533,0.0000016572725,0.00005042363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944927,0.00007985512,0.0009347575,0.00012956274,0.0041549196,0.00020819307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98239565,0.0020309843,0.0021307785,0.00016553087,0.013195981,0.00008105476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0318094,0.00006322107,0.00021703416,0.023174819,0.00027664736,0.000629636,0.00074256794,0.0001361866,0.0000025326103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13454843,0.00004007589,0.000040128063,0.05246556,0.00030477426,0.0034245087,0.00019145884,0.00019883066,0.0000025294662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007602598,0.0000676298,0.63326037,0.000011942812,0.000038395472,3.7403402e-7,0.009836748,0.00028045572,0.011132689,0.0936509,0.0029411574,0.24870333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022606482,0.0002984042,0.24591257,0.000060020477,0.000026023768,0.00000800958,0.023995452,0.027251286,0.005107863,0.68702215,0.007903318,0.00015425222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006164548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024080437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5933713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032602894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005737058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996956},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1942393901","doi":"10.1002/asi.23107","title":"In‐text author citation analysis: Feasibility, benefits, and limitations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.34927831880499,"score_gpt":0.5014277466597552,"score_spread":0.1521494278547652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942393901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95710444,0.00011385596,0.00390658,0.03673122,0.00043635964,0.00025055133,0.000010155195,0.000007102617,0.0014397291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987292,0.00008276395,0.00083876954,0.00022317033,0.000014050934,0.0000038812477,3.9087712e-7,9.851217e-7,0.00010675679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951604,0.000074205454,0.0008162161,0.0001336137,0.0035999846,0.00021559885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849486,0.0031634578,0.0014175626,0.00022890545,0.010151094,0.00009038266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045519795,0.000054133696,0.00019885106,0.048560478,0.0003770715,0.0011160679,0.00092986657,0.000108551525,0.0000025856186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21993978,0.000033087534,0.00006698106,0.13405824,0.00021120204,0.0038953137,0.00021929947,0.00017050671,0.0000047757176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108502845,0.000030764448,0.6664028,0.0000031999991,0.000026514066,3.290914e-8,0.00063219026,0.00038547552,0.00018376927,0.1068413,0.0016653027,0.22381778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005890708,0.00014737362,0.88091683,0.0000051972675,0.000035895915,0.000005217775,0.001305892,0.01920825,0.00033343752,0.07215886,0.025226848,0.00006714942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041816197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035838275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22375064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026000701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020558768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946178535","doi":"10.1177/007327530304100202","title":"Who Discovered the Expanding Universe?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Universe; History; Astronomy; Physics","score_opus":0.555241374166491,"score_gpt":0.5195925378661979,"score_spread":0.03564883630029314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946178535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5147499,0.0021689273,0.0041609965,0.0003626995,0.003022403,0.00018288635,0.000007068889,0.000011688319,0.47533345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96482867,0.00005030979,0.0003859099,0.00006750043,0.000011154082,0.0000012432578,6.356229e-8,0.0000027114536,0.034652464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99062145,0.00014021744,0.00032654827,0.0004886175,0.008012928,0.0004102514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959473,0.0014667906,0.00022234817,0.0008134827,0.0013241874,0.00022586116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025426963,0.00007406494,0.00015460984,0.019743249,0.0004427486,0.00032182224,0.0034015295,0.000027438853,0.0007832991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027135022,0.000041638454,0.000081946266,0.10206936,0.0046729525,0.0010088593,0.00042045774,0.00012714248,0.000103606675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035876936,0.0003036438,0.060384516,0.00001129023,0.000011358631,0.000025039919,0.010787497,0.00033240783,0.12427587,0.3377009,0.37492472,0.09120689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003012837,0.000102866376,0.032417085,0.000010319242,0.0000033660203,0.000009161539,0.004671637,0.0014048903,0.0055290246,0.011247398,0.9441167,0.00018626208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004720548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007555917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013902576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947240674","doi":"10.1080/03632415.2015.1065253","title":"Finding the Path to a Successful Graduate and Research Career: Advice for Early Career Researchers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Career path; Path (computing); Career development; Graduate students; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.892270086119703,"score_gpt":0.6038514188641457,"score_spread":0.2884186672555573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947240674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714849,0.0007217404,0.0005017533,0.017584056,0.00042584914,0.0009746747,0.000113579634,0.000038993076,0.008154429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98677355,0.00006142295,0.0012852225,0.00019533733,0.00021391138,0.00021411631,0.0000041873686,0.0000241404,0.011228096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839261,0.0007512983,0.0004664913,0.0008542364,0.01272724,0.0012746439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765213,0.010797779,0.000087486,0.0010163473,0.010474065,0.0011029972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06402325,0.00016273692,0.00028671077,0.016002981,0.00092575565,0.0073085213,0.0031219933,0.00011756201,0.00007701696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12447759,0.000095415024,0.0000895748,0.09209617,0.00061129546,0.0008490113,0.0019172755,0.0005729565,0.00016057116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022724706,0.000037812344,0.31208536,0.00001919797,0.00002114296,0.00001780068,0.010299529,0.000008145995,0.000087261455,0.00067145174,0.6118971,0.06462795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084732746,0.0013858436,0.2501767,0.000027730552,0.000006269294,0.000007876673,0.03244034,0.0014316182,0.0005142517,0.022698611,0.6901267,0.00033670283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026665176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044692666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07822963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001833292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048623251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950766814","doi":"10.1002/asi.23575","title":"The power–law relationship between citation‐based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale‐independent approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Universidad del Norte; Universidad Católica del Norte","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Citation impact; Scale (ratio); Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science; Geography","score_opus":0.3021124265811342,"score_gpt":0.4858847286269922,"score_spread":0.18377230204585804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950766814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840862,0.000102711296,0.0014046807,0.011857731,0.00018716363,0.0003404085,0.00000393857,0.0000042383513,0.0020129366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987358,0.000032641703,0.0010791075,0.000074117335,0.000008160502,0.0000110329665,3.1349376e-7,0.0000014243044,0.000057435434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940333,0.000113612376,0.0009476248,0.00011575942,0.0045367843,0.00025297122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99156094,0.001606213,0.0011751462,0.00018521819,0.0053765927,0.00009586407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061516386,0.00005915736,0.00014440257,0.017902134,0.00052335917,0.0017640183,0.000948335,0.00009748955,4.4259815e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038114842,0.000033045573,0.000025459314,0.06636781,0.0002691578,0.0036003564,0.00018658588,0.000261913,0.000002831572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001774871,0.000016026237,0.96886957,0.0000033384495,0.000002892568,7.700751e-8,0.0006470917,0.00040603313,0.000009324293,0.014455386,0.00033781608,0.0152347125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011253327,0.00010420992,0.94006413,0.000015701331,0.0000047722533,0.0000047242274,0.008176398,0.00959987,0.00017069066,0.036786642,0.0038945328,0.00005301376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004321991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002564278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048465677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005847867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003572362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992722},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1952399979","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2015-0049","title":"The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Originality; Scholarly communication; Value (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Social science; Qualitative research; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.2653638725223654,"score_gpt":0.46011301814876754,"score_spread":0.19474914562640216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952399979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94496405,0.003099541,0.008536135,0.001598832,0.00020215134,0.00027643822,0.0000024481565,0.000004204632,0.041316185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517995,0.0018997018,0.0027448782,0.000039156566,0.000008281832,0.0000019683855,6.445499e-7,0.0000015318889,0.00012388112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948303,0.00015500456,0.0011808461,0.00005594668,0.0035602162,0.0002176969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954595,0.00066136726,0.0009432894,0.00037441906,0.0024282644,0.0001331741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042783454,0.000053805063,0.00013068577,0.013080357,0.00012181853,0.0019192507,0.0014151575,0.000032113265,0.000008784327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071235737,0.00003109573,0.000046453086,0.017969688,0.000071752096,0.008653505,0.00057170173,0.0002289681,0.000022110376],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056785968,0.000029551315,0.08200018,0.0000039720835,0.000015847749,7.945072e-7,0.00080834475,0.00026088554,0.0000064778906,0.017655179,0.0010604494,0.8981015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001916018,0.00035616226,0.66752326,0.000048505375,0.000010015983,0.000022415294,0.044926796,0.009276169,0.00028999837,0.0887939,0.18672319,0.00011358181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015266329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004552544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89798796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008319974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000667305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953706973","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2157-1","title":"Neophilia ranking of scientific journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; University of Illinois at Chicago","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Information retrieval; Scientific literature; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Citation; Geology","score_opus":0.7322136034264928,"score_gpt":0.6133548832507849,"score_spread":0.11885872017570787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953706973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95462674,0.0021876637,0.02599094,0.0015964389,0.0042207,0.00028231234,0.000101821825,0.000043757842,0.01094963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864747,0.00018074313,0.0018732687,0.00005303145,0.00011506751,0.000004282975,8.5659644e-7,0.000015671732,0.011282366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605085,0.00035390694,0.0017099311,0.0013636119,0.034763012,0.0013010231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96909523,0.011056822,0.0010530971,0.0021534045,0.01551424,0.001127233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10989885,0.00022311913,0.0005636096,0.3311329,0.00060516875,0.0046070055,0.0061568823,0.00015952627,0.0029112697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23368925,0.000117548196,0.00038906085,0.6913339,0.00126198,0.0017193832,0.0014450144,0.00022139132,0.0012319804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016902004,0.00016456137,0.27150992,0.000005237749,0.000013393643,0.000009699492,0.00011183134,0.000008658365,0.04910531,0.0023077675,0.015953306,0.6607934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352449,0.00039873007,0.68733615,0.000114950424,0.000019723577,0.00003949886,0.00025834888,0.000977283,0.06320393,0.06730294,0.17730926,0.00068673596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013861546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004497225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66010666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023739987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005451105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995457},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1957687230","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.479","title":"The SciELO Open Access: A Gold Way from the South","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SciELO; Credibility; Open access publishing; Transparency (behavior); Open access journal; Access to information; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information access; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.5749072824000946,"score_gpt":0.6038623861155267,"score_spread":0.028955103715432084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957687230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89075696,0.003992829,0.000038987713,0.07019139,0.01587262,0.0002645693,0.000036419704,0.0000019907643,0.018844223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718905,0.000022740152,0.00018156729,0.0015426583,0.0009228128,0.0000047646795,0.0000011993147,0.000006521564,0.025427202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964135,0.00017826831,0.0005053283,0.00021568425,0.0023092444,0.00037793137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122316,0.0031177208,0.0005091372,0.0007848388,0.0033705079,0.0009946459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01277004,0.00007935713,0.00013143802,0.007382094,0.0007790551,0.023533847,0.0119810775,0.000065603315,0.0026914047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013435264,0.000035140667,0.00008720849,0.039739627,0.00026397794,0.001383209,0.00030841178,0.0005575629,0.00018157021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004271227,0.000013534113,0.172291,1.5892127e-7,0.000009339529,0.000002070026,0.0003687723,0.0000016807023,0.00008761962,0.002314278,0.74892384,0.07598346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006237921,0.000012039834,0.41773456,0.000003204336,0.0000032520118,0.000004272575,0.00036705876,0.0000068932304,0.000033429787,0.015979068,0.5657593,0.00003456507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020034216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03805057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24544355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011945343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007801085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957715089","doi":"10.3171/2014.8.peds1488","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of pediatric neurosurgery in North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Pediatric neurosurgery; Scopus; Gini coefficient; Neurosurgery; Citation; Index (typography); Productivity; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Demography; Pediatrics; Library science; Surgery; Inequality; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43494201368189184,"score_gpt":0.49887993718459184,"score_spread":0.0639379235027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957715089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917011,0.0023068495,0.0011468699,0.00029367922,0.0037484064,0.00022296018,0.000026814823,0.000010776592,0.0005424941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926597,0.005645488,0.00024285163,0.00019488801,0.0011625849,0.0000042591328,0.000002489466,0.000032597985,0.00005517316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646095,0.0025549391,0.004502644,0.0007378785,0.026671916,0.00092311436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477991,0.030113848,0.005105072,0.0010684425,0.015113396,0.00080016244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07710907,0.00032023148,0.0011999218,0.70914066,0.00012147119,0.0008763614,0.0024929252,0.00018332533,0.0002187209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28030527,0.00024678337,0.0006918821,0.8546616,0.00013809121,0.0014294088,0.0004600276,0.0009173762,0.000075636715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049571805,0.00038605285,0.83308965,0.000017802104,0.0000047280537,0.000039414394,0.00003168422,0.0045129424,0.00009445272,0.0000043791,0.015848065,0.14592126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080807763,0.00040247705,0.98185456,0.0000033872343,0.00008432314,0.00004260489,0.000037860773,0.008691118,0.000047758705,0.00054602785,0.007246431,0.00023537295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018970306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000664349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2031962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016209524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011687481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959603137","doi":"10.18438/b8k31f","title":"Google Scholar Could Be Used as a Stand-Alone Resource for Systematic Reviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; Medicine; Citation; Medical literature; Meta-analysis; National library; Medical library; Grey literature; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5601701496845081,"score_gpt":0.5410592668661927,"score_spread":0.01911088281831541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959603137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029777497,0.08072324,0.16147123,0.6492943,0.0016601849,0.022294855,0.00037762552,0.00056740065,0.053833675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36405694,0.022203173,0.14457011,0.44190055,0.00079853006,0.002519077,0.00032219576,0.00012378335,0.023505634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050766,0.0016217823,0.0016254454,0.00038240312,0.005471566,0.00039112024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580601,0.036997594,0.0015178433,0.00096220634,0.001678194,0.00078405614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06381022,0.0001892628,0.0005098367,0.010433259,0.00040734131,0.008359995,0.0013162734,0.00013925612,0.00018113053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49656546,0.00012574451,0.0001184732,0.038126,0.000076274104,0.24769938,0.0003537107,0.00042181884,0.0006052449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023866873,0.0003142033,0.0020908338,0.008180517,0.00006155608,0.000017456407,0.0019032458,0.000335973,0.000100611425,0.10217591,0.84847164,0.033961367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073455134,0.00045220996,0.00014466835,0.0012224384,0.000024191993,0.00002196092,0.0029351213,0.0109661,0.00043153498,0.0006012205,0.9822867,0.00017931026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006305405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1117548e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43275523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047432437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080358074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964238286","doi":"10.3152/095820208x331685","title":"The effect of university–industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: the Canadian case, 1980–2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Citation impact; Impact factor; Citation; Library science; Scientific field; Field (mathematics); Political science; Engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.7929027252031994,"score_gpt":0.6583639922991803,"score_spread":0.13453873290401908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964238286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791776,0.0003049699,0.000015765245,0.010551853,0.00014969456,0.0015011952,0.00007995359,0.000004117908,0.008214837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635905,0.00006525257,0.000005925635,0.000005609522,0.000036068137,0.000024886554,0.000009979676,0.000004839779,0.0034884058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96757215,0.010667453,0.00050861284,0.00048881467,0.02002274,0.000740256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92264056,0.05250234,0.0003547271,0.0019477984,0.022138678,0.00041591233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26544315,0.000089410896,0.00014017177,0.02278983,0.005195083,0.0017458415,0.0023418237,0.00014694764,0.00055457215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19679096,0.000036781003,0.00012653219,0.17503549,0.0017058696,0.0004580744,0.00022219535,0.000680069,0.00011755805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040746309,0.0001913643,0.15608342,0.000010264266,0.0001611293,0.000039515846,0.0020713627,0.0061701564,0.0021014067,0.02137452,0.63383085,0.17755856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013273844,0.0019528205,0.6832947,0.000031079075,0.00003442675,0.00010227586,0.0059368275,0.2298632,0.006289696,0.0036710757,0.06727146,0.00022502952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028813874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0651793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5665594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013227226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081312265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965304071","doi":"10.1890/090048","title":"Behind the shroud: a survey of editors in ecology and evolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Population ecology; Ecology; Transparency (behavior); Population; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2267073699088513,"score_gpt":0.4591595438825929,"score_spread":0.2324521739737416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965304071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077171787,0.98809105,0.00023643556,0.00041000295,0.0023775138,0.0009725864,0.000039612434,0.0000016567441,0.00015394216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026764356,0.9725665,0.00012339688,0.00003598304,0.00010318589,0.00006353061,0.000008111877,0.000007663438,0.00032728864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298227,0.0034971794,0.0010777805,0.0006760181,0.001284031,0.0004826994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898003,0.008937884,0.00054394396,0.00057580357,0.000050640665,0.0000914335],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03739912,0.00023319098,0.0014289152,0.011855655,0.00016640306,0.00010636739,0.0013689816,0.00050277147,0.000046760313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072215386,0.00011351308,0.00012642799,0.011472346,0.0016524704,0.00009644439,0.0007360594,0.000708293,0.000015835263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034939283,0.00012114227,0.3990027,0.000044996963,0.000039456045,0.0000063117254,0.0001071578,0.000023802197,1.6535408e-8,0.00010733199,0.007938514,0.59257364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006049691,0.00013187475,0.75092417,0.00004116326,0.000036410678,0.000006192504,0.00008072605,0.00024787278,5.0805184e-8,0.007077595,0.24074054,0.000108416854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020325324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005170292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032406324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015535727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966005845","doi":"10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00434.x","title":"Citation Index Identifies Highly Cited Investigators in Food Science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Food Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Citation analysis; Index (typography); Citation index; Library science; Computer science; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.36666538248945324,"score_gpt":0.5368220584075079,"score_spread":0.1701566759180546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966005845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50077736,0.0007738785,0.00082471926,0.0002046811,0.4962146,0.00021162127,0.000038746748,0.000011030012,0.0009433771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91300267,0.00021358267,0.0008082826,0.000060532057,0.08565508,0.000003033059,0.0000015600691,0.000021216178,0.00023404155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9091725,0.00033243137,0.0033550533,0.0015910808,0.083785765,0.0017631917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076518,0.019828483,0.005787165,0.0019585565,0.061943714,0.0028303242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20987634,0.00043040485,0.0010182047,0.33610433,0.0009064233,0.012083551,0.016681273,0.0005963524,0.000049057162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48447573,0.00031067946,0.00032833067,0.5324502,0.0060891113,0.0070503466,0.0017520755,0.0031988693,0.000055406803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014152333,0.0003872834,0.009787949,0.000042290656,0.000034965236,0.00014558044,0.0016317358,0.00029767453,0.015222311,0.0007478399,0.9377406,0.03382024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069848388,0.015320501,0.33834603,0.0015244936,0.000079932855,0.00021012952,0.008069264,0.004512275,0.07809705,0.14499614,0.3980766,0.0037827543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059048856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014555623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53966403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016800296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01878634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967787540","doi":"10.1002/pssb.201140118","title":"My half‐century long relations with physica status solidi","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"physica status solidi (b)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Communism; Political science; State (computer science); Economic history; Management; Library science; History; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.39764821511170856,"score_gpt":0.48157530069995524,"score_spread":0.08392708558824669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967787540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8151737,0.001549305,0.0097568715,0.001090531,0.0011066231,0.0012588543,0.0003841554,0.00030488282,0.16937508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933085,0.00051337277,0.0026265488,0.00014312695,0.0002629913,0.000062268235,0.000038833787,0.00006470345,0.002979647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866826,0.0003298328,0.00087220635,0.0015054903,0.0081889145,0.00242095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991072,0.002082493,0.00056765927,0.0018775406,0.0029893622,0.0014109542],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00261272,0.00047477105,0.0007128963,0.014086594,0.0007961874,0.0015793821,0.0020334702,0.00014312053,0.0012258654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003436482,0.0003322686,0.0003389868,0.08935497,0.00058652344,0.0017787952,0.00085206394,0.0007265543,0.003144502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011293316,0.008586022,0.38828543,0.00008218599,0.00080874923,0.00040041047,0.024706185,0.0006666021,0.0066125346,0.059350263,0.21108331,0.29828897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032548904,0.0016274608,0.6494538,0.00007302056,0.00014153082,0.000020036758,0.004129611,0.0075498195,0.008768649,0.03735227,0.2857003,0.0019286114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011659564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013772333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29636037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027896592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008007288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967988001","doi":"10.1002/asi.10401","title":"A classification of author co‐citations: Definitions and search strategies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Information retrieval; Dialog box; Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Classification scheme; Library science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.45324412709551765,"score_gpt":0.5484433231515129,"score_spread":0.09519919605599525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967988001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96094525,0.00008379877,0.024614703,0.013751134,0.000065252054,0.00015917709,0.000023453485,0.0000060533584,0.00035117418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614454,0.00031252528,0.013363775,0.00015798466,0.000007749282,0.0000047102185,3.4514304e-7,0.0000013302356,0.00000702797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963189,0.000021353077,0.0006214915,0.00010629703,0.0027354306,0.00019656702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907926,0.00078761356,0.0010057655,0.00022200921,0.0071059414,0.00008607421],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012270492,0.000053832413,0.00017913293,0.01076668,0.0005112202,0.00067992194,0.0010467438,0.000043637745,0.0000016581114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012402558,0.000031327076,0.00010440448,0.07291707,0.0038212745,0.0026941649,0.00017467282,0.00017843646,0.0000019433635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956971,0.00011054745,0.024547795,0.00002833414,0.000047181053,1.8802581e-7,0.004337339,0.00029357648,0.033727318,0.6107148,0.003863125,0.32229024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015326502,0.0015163083,0.37943402,0.000041181942,0.000031961285,0.00017372865,0.23968054,0.005978982,0.009196152,0.34677935,0.015424814,0.00021030642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011595512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013388473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35488623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008949387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010846596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888974},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1968686188","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0033339","title":"A Small World of Citations? The Influence of Collaboration Networks on Citation Practices","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Social network analysis; Six degrees of separation; Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Data science; Citation analysis; Sociology; Social capital; Library science; World Wide Web; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.7537439886594658,"score_gpt":0.5410086143231037,"score_spread":0.21273537433636214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968686188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99489886,0.00042245598,0.00065825233,0.0012726873,0.000067106586,0.00030032397,0.000010533332,0.0000059145077,0.0023638618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969495,0.00010068653,0.0022451878,0.00010016603,0.000058937905,0.000019649191,0.0000026094604,0.0000042270867,0.0005190703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941808,0.00034021802,0.00053712225,0.00018473393,0.0045300135,0.00022710417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040545,0.012869768,0.0011972395,0.0004622022,0.0049581863,0.000107178996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013207464,0.00006394309,0.00017476795,0.014461544,0.000114435825,0.00032202524,0.00073927944,0.00004334737,0.000077404875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08387373,0.000039128296,0.000036319885,0.13282561,0.00012031674,0.00080181763,0.000102474536,0.0001450471,0.000045915902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017599907,0.003759257,0.9212569,0.000041666055,0.00013416914,4.1353636e-7,0.002036602,0.010525202,0.026019754,0.01602731,0.002361399,0.017661342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023042632,0.00024172722,0.9744478,0.00005350294,0.000032782238,1.593415e-7,0.0008529997,0.011448375,0.010172206,0.0018991558,0.0005354114,0.00008545727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046035006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007473977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118364066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003272779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008823783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970372549","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0122565","title":"Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Discipline; Citation analysis; Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Sociology; Library science; Data science; Space (punctuation); Scientific literature; Impact factor; Social science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7704361682673871,"score_gpt":0.5791235230802817,"score_spread":0.19131264518710545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970372549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837945,0.00042453283,0.0026116343,0.0022854966,0.0006536293,0.00031149594,0.000060643844,0.000050437404,0.009807598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95976704,0.0000036004574,0.0016772567,0.00009208081,0.0001503038,0.0000153968,0.0000056018393,0.000013478677,0.03827526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983467,0.00017484576,0.0005620929,0.0010148982,0.013975717,0.00080547883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059385,0.0009362899,0.00014459719,0.0014349541,0.005339855,0.0015504719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019292437,0.00017349806,0.00040193024,0.03026461,0.00031496666,0.005528323,0.003050066,0.00009332795,0.0013901651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021238623,0.000117278105,0.00014226124,0.16695791,0.0002687907,0.00078185735,0.001754044,0.00028351584,0.0067435857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013583782,0.0024359275,0.8241358,0.0000110294495,0.00005375649,0.000036187666,0.0005581077,0.00006493244,0.0066113826,0.00062098715,0.15573934,0.009596745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087955943,0.00095743645,0.9580109,0.0000699528,0.000024431236,0.0000029925327,0.00019686256,0.0031994286,0.012030901,0.015615336,0.008454306,0.00055789185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050228027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008721635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14728503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004255506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033172718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970405099","doi":"10.1177/0306312710374130","title":"Evaluating the social capital accrued in large research networks: The case of the Sustainable Forest Management Network (1995-2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Excellence; Competition (biology); Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Capital (architecture); Distribution (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Sustainable development; Sociology; Regional science; Marketing; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.6211380137896874,"score_gpt":0.6552401674890737,"score_spread":0.034102153699386295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970405099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896781,0.0011008425,0.000042654745,0.0042789704,0.0008990624,0.00092389184,0.000007813421,0.00000512835,0.003063541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847025,0.000109497814,0.000095527714,0.00006957797,0.0003644903,0.000057913807,1.3300058e-7,0.00000654818,0.000826083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855076,0.0009909398,0.0008439754,0.0006560768,0.010244548,0.0017568433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446345,0.0074147615,0.00047155967,0.0007620208,0.006799381,0.00008884954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.174477,0.00014124134,0.00034087602,0.004542439,0.010920717,0.00091002457,0.0063191643,0.000085630425,0.000031576372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03981408,0.00006249786,0.00018261721,0.18604724,0.011766137,0.00044998026,0.007543627,0.0009366231,0.000005565492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016649826,0.0006461163,0.17487867,0.00008367921,0.0001620657,0.00018632911,0.08879804,0.005605008,0.00049318443,0.5271335,0.053617988,0.1482289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006151706,0.0001718024,0.45604542,0.000016210037,0.000016430218,0.000008381176,0.43594185,0.012666603,0.00003656055,0.092741385,0.0015713975,0.00016880206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010703848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042970446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43439212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002128028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004694554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970475751","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.001","title":"A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duration (music); Variety (cybernetics); History; Library science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Art; Literature; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5442823854424196,"score_gpt":0.49369882529647185,"score_spread":0.050583560145947726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970475751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61518985,0.15626375,0.006094589,0.18644637,0.005480275,0.0008165257,0.000017975566,0.0000095731975,0.029681098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497766,0.002094906,0.0035404917,0.0014562737,0.0002734649,0.0000035743344,6.603546e-7,0.000013967715,0.007638975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741402,0.00036978305,0.0021115465,0.00020742622,0.022917632,0.00025336968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90216583,0.003196306,0.0048668096,0.0009846168,0.08838559,0.00040083975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09170985,0.000091439004,0.00043532107,0.017818809,0.0000783311,0.012726604,0.005046038,0.00013541483,0.0009505248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44196722,0.000046803314,0.00037219233,0.05327814,0.0001433343,0.05901101,0.0005907869,0.0013478335,0.000021694832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005335226,0.0000647203,0.08358614,0.000043821543,0.00001893233,0.0000013908389,0.00014412378,0.000003883353,0.005288256,0.00050910056,0.8450524,0.065281875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004895928,0.00017276744,0.6065431,0.0006470091,0.000030049698,0.000056909594,0.0002908213,0.00033603926,0.00065796217,0.01538314,0.3752751,0.000117491996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025789198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000112864445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52295697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010514976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971509762","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0007","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable?: A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Institution; Publish or perish; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Production (economics); Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Social science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.39111413594857386,"score_gpt":0.43648218703860087,"score_spread":0.045368051090027006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971509762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93776876,0.0083007375,0.0001548066,0.0444343,0.005641203,0.0002140611,0.000007429427,0.000008524836,0.003470163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270016,0.0007763832,0.0018975069,0.0019398491,0.0007546027,0.000008490319,0.0000031426835,0.000020087482,0.0018998019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694736,0.00064490637,0.0019854142,0.0007222993,0.0088366335,0.0008633694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97072905,0.011181057,0.0019381596,0.0014862654,0.013768659,0.0008967768],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08270154,0.00020293557,0.000486189,0.030193117,0.0006682658,0.73616904,0.009130952,0.00027271925,0.001956732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14900234,0.000117397394,0.00031997918,0.08480976,0.0002768356,0.3849102,0.0014348964,0.0027482559,0.00015896949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018747876,0.000116528354,0.40680015,0.0000012666145,0.00003171505,0.000023476325,0.0013368633,0.0001653336,0.0009102448,0.00045372255,0.11720199,0.47293997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009216503,0.00006974957,0.49783057,0.0001527946,0.000008147152,0.00005132537,0.021496594,0.002480779,0.000067017456,0.053704374,0.42295846,0.0002585515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059863686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037202451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4726814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041504248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086320436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972405173","doi":"10.1007/s10508-013-0105-1","title":"The Impact Factor: Just the Facts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Factor (programming language); Impact factor; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Nursing","score_opus":0.5018076595022666,"score_gpt":0.585251921673665,"score_spread":0.08344426217139844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972405173","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20631593,0.0036933068,0.000113024194,0.00044589568,0.7788092,0.0018931101,0.0033026624,0.00004621709,0.005380632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46121523,0.0026330696,0.00023385698,0.000023031673,0.4677925,0.00036001185,0.00024016005,0.00015677,0.067345336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801289,0.0006424912,0.0012779484,0.0010036154,0.015837427,0.0011096246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91673356,0.0769424,0.0010304535,0.0026591544,0.0020838522,0.00055056345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00692999,0.00046097062,0.0006955537,0.0155016305,0.0008866849,0.004291855,0.010682773,0.00042265342,0.00065743906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043418054,0.00017835408,0.00040367385,0.030944379,0.0014629243,0.00038371698,0.0022770755,0.0017613164,0.0005871348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021074802,0.000101856065,0.0027405417,0.0000041079984,0.000028599326,0.000003850361,0.00028811058,0.0000019643112,0.0004964764,0.000017349232,0.6816831,0.31461293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032877162,0.00080130127,0.19433399,0.000012397389,0.00005232853,0.0000023127216,0.001128621,0.000122057754,0.0001859897,0.0008559894,0.80182785,0.00034840658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017544627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078679885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3142645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007547688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009893358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972804538","doi":"10.1108/02640471111141124","title":"Metadata assessment in e‐theses and dissertations of Canadian institutional repositories","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Library science; Data element; World Wide Web; Element (criminal law); Information retrieval; Political science","score_opus":0.4750425197805155,"score_gpt":0.4923809298565076,"score_spread":0.017338410075992128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972804538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373887,0.0018358015,0.00014352988,0.0019086223,0.00011691026,0.00015621631,0.000024678428,0.000007805503,0.05841771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778044,0.00034969172,0.00048162942,0.000052284748,0.000015958887,0.000008912919,0.000005532544,0.0000036722188,0.0013018937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977982,0.00014036307,0.00030916644,0.00022069173,0.0011957742,0.00033579147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982874,0.0009927929,0.000078150064,0.00038085866,0.00012199101,0.00013885231],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028992957,0.000060371978,0.00012185035,0.01774521,0.0001785316,0.00046724553,0.0010981744,0.000032457432,0.0003194062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014593676,0.00003396467,0.000029627396,0.05708484,0.00018328431,0.0017111222,0.00019098578,0.000193732,0.0000049336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011587684,0.000044542536,0.23831138,0.0000016982258,0.000015137271,0.000005711676,0.00046918873,0.0000032934374,0.00015719692,0.7553106,0.00089010224,0.0047795777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011669706,0.00008597918,0.8513113,0.0000045512957,0.0000042031666,0.000008252867,0.0006375252,0.00034670916,0.002973486,0.13113745,0.013304298,0.00006953601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028712852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019986972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62417316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042967553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974967198","doi":"10.1186/1748-5908-3-49","title":"The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Implementation Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Vancouver Island University; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research","keywords":"Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Citation; Underpinning; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Data science; Social science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6583037772825364,"score_gpt":0.6445441319892308,"score_spread":0.013759645293305645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974967198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598915,0.0002925802,0.037967395,0.0009972599,0.00025558038,0.0003356833,0.000038232105,0.0000057727075,0.00021600582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990372,0.00006616329,0.00046540264,0.00008508654,0.000018243962,0.000007884175,0.000002574078,0.0000025159748,0.00031492955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993484,0.00019643115,0.0005948393,0.00050981523,0.00485882,0.00035607515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919374,0.004263758,0.00028245244,0.0005142066,0.0028222518,0.00017990735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009315564,0.00009194029,0.0001493691,0.012151625,0.0015151832,0.000828479,0.0016479826,0.000030010771,0.00028097362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01965502,0.000048549475,0.000067173634,0.19797252,0.00066753203,0.0005762148,0.00025396218,0.00010247512,0.000014013491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039431467,0.00003422513,0.81124085,0.0000028407771,0.000028707298,6.520179e-7,0.012261026,0.0002805858,0.0075176144,0.0018859113,0.0138824405,0.15282571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001869179,0.00009692885,0.9604092,0.000002091335,0.000013425614,0.000004411145,0.0024329396,0.0036593187,0.027776252,0.0011029213,0.0042368537,0.00007871209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010842672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012219535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097903896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040809298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975195640","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.205","title":"Truth or Hope?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Publishing; Project commissioning; History; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.599150201540233,"score_gpt":0.5600144062844251,"score_spread":0.039135795255807904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975195640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530039,0.0004108178,0.0023132574,0.014660595,0.006155688,0.000074200776,0.00001007115,0.000013308865,0.023358187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836229,0.000068028145,0.010942952,0.00055121636,0.0011654353,6.8221686e-7,4.0160268e-7,0.000013469901,0.0036349006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782469,0.00026910935,0.0015038035,0.00038302178,0.019028202,0.00056891725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9461165,0.012612008,0.0019839145,0.0011239091,0.036436763,0.0017269192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11570161,0.00013315215,0.00039136442,0.06743133,0.00032856688,0.27771267,0.0077332957,0.0002904363,0.0022175629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63688576,0.00007152335,0.0002707753,0.1286101,0.00011070477,0.14624892,0.0008279477,0.0044804597,0.00014241465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013800201,0.00021040175,0.19464226,0.0000035165344,0.000038328253,0.00026270532,0.00024369011,0.00000900976,0.012165803,0.006296622,0.23665029,0.54933935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013610094,0.00042348466,0.23864117,0.00002041159,0.000011986962,0.00075832265,0.0010792969,0.00032200915,0.0012952216,0.028615715,0.7272372,0.00023414602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026360267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002073286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5491052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008175284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009792314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975272578","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0120838","title":"Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Peer review; Computer science; Limiting; Actuarial science; Operations research; Business; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8317168938297779,"score_gpt":0.5837133120449581,"score_spread":0.24800358178481974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975272578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90140796,0.0010962364,0.00041847513,0.0018501162,0.00014876752,0.000254287,0.00002800541,0.000018899103,0.094777234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93616164,0.0003100482,0.023539023,0.0001442022,0.00010414762,0.000010510311,0.0000036389738,0.000013320909,0.039713454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98020273,0.00018397137,0.00060183567,0.00041818974,0.018213516,0.00037975737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884099,0.0013024476,0.0002238965,0.00078285194,0.008762887,0.000518035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025940713,0.000098315104,0.00041715815,0.012145962,0.000045706765,0.0004849789,0.0016143031,0.000072260824,0.0017780941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089213096,0.00006556462,0.00010674592,0.094712585,0.00013487243,0.0003805126,0.0005540204,0.00017076555,0.0032321704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014441666,0.0058559715,0.45294005,0.00011531178,0.00029415748,0.000050701023,0.0013005588,0.000038172668,0.0065971464,0.0035566932,0.48383114,0.045275696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010186099,0.0030634701,0.11589468,0.0008451924,0.00047028088,0.000052118365,0.0071310294,0.04194045,0.11525868,0.054438695,0.647809,0.0029102494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048475464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018331484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33704534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062876585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001759211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976145974","doi":"10.1300/j111v35n01_13","title":"The Canadian National Site Licensing Project","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Public relations; Engineering management; Engineering; Management; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.5497505971394616,"score_gpt":0.5577429311832415,"score_spread":0.007992334043779858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976145974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83785254,0.0007361792,0.00039401432,0.046116933,0.0011763743,0.00020837052,0.000024296038,0.000011156365,0.11348016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940915,0.00020111179,0.0008772194,0.0003631375,0.00044058356,5.9293893e-7,0.000003203898,0.000005095361,0.0040175654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932066,0.00019645412,0.00071600353,0.00014077191,0.005478668,0.0002614897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500376,0.0021209407,0.000489479,0.00016321169,0.0018949576,0.00032766868],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009964211,0.0000661381,0.00011198106,0.015528117,0.00062085874,0.005674185,0.0009153221,0.00006378593,0.00020132907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010993872,0.000036770347,0.00010580325,0.042773277,0.000077431716,0.0027206072,0.000055894558,0.0002552337,0.00006610201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003061374,0.00014310304,0.28932112,0.0000024785536,0.000041111336,0.00041310096,0.0003081677,0.00007926495,0.0004993152,0.014743937,0.5395341,0.15460816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019394708,0.00031816584,0.13696752,0.0000068915506,0.0000026503667,0.0004545438,0.00020008106,0.0018922769,0.00038546737,0.009247801,0.850257,0.00007367709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029486805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005489541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31072286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096926444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00508955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976755538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.221","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Volume (thermodynamics); Sociology; History; Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976755538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61660606,0.030480098,0.0013427282,0.34306479,0.0061687473,0.00014370581,0.000026551439,0.0000110951405,0.002156243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737337,0.001601854,0.0032460766,0.002971091,0.016688844,0.0000020505709,7.3660703e-7,0.00001462127,0.0017410152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870357,0.00057628175,0.0010269821,0.00030002213,0.010651668,0.00040938304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810392,0.00837975,0.000982341,0.000651776,0.008506033,0.00044088953],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07506255,0.00012480674,0.00028721054,0.0075222063,0.0009200902,0.2350358,0.0054393015,0.0001372683,0.00031700914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816296,0.000052438296,0.00015423668,0.042812586,0.00019728128,0.10896567,0.0010693881,0.002130181,0.000050904677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565018,0.000023193257,0.11240533,9.71311e-7,0.000029718944,0.0000072503753,0.00077007763,0.000016606642,0.00024630307,0.00028115636,0.60025644,0.28594732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781936,0.000059240825,0.13892668,0.000026490916,0.000010973346,0.000069505244,0.0033402233,0.00027784734,0.000047675207,0.0045476067,0.85239273,0.00007319054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016265025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053020358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35712767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002990528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976829395","doi":"10.1087/20100308","title":"Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":407,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; History; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.4691507489717965,"score_gpt":0.5446447001275085,"score_spread":0.07549395115571206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976829395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98865014,0.00006835814,0.00015264064,0.004176608,0.00046421948,0.000107357824,0.000007549075,0.000011436794,0.006361692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944706,0.000007163489,0.0050972393,0.000090530615,0.000056094057,0.0000032266144,5.308259e-7,0.0000074893046,0.00026713716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924708,0.0003407853,0.0007510531,0.0004545255,0.005543618,0.00043922156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941319,0.001774797,0.00035975783,0.0011735096,0.0023162456,0.00024375222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026254423,0.00008915735,0.0002246645,0.007787386,0.000134512,0.008234481,0.003581348,0.00014579209,0.00058316626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08664541,0.00005457128,0.00009636728,0.09393616,0.00027348992,0.011626391,0.0007767081,0.00091479684,0.00005085576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014596147,0.00012778112,0.8655559,0.000003941846,0.000002270818,0.0000018005483,0.00042909736,0.000054574175,0.031422984,0.0091437735,0.0002520109,0.092991315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034274737,0.000027447079,0.93057775,0.000012789908,0.00000194851,0.000008433878,0.00105311,0.0075124945,0.017921843,0.040666588,0.0017866697,0.000088177614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008070748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038273906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09290314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023052959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016638849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99279505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977087914","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.257","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Business model; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.30117199054805116,"score_gpt":0.46586916195735545,"score_spread":0.1646971714093043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977087914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94724506,0.0027705927,0.00023066804,0.030354328,0.005557388,0.00011601701,0.000027869062,0.000010073249,0.013688005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391496,0.00034857582,0.0015412507,0.0003850035,0.003242284,0.0000011343171,6.018816e-7,0.000016594746,0.0005496046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616854,0.00066638185,0.002360699,0.0004520857,0.033857998,0.0009774073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8279288,0.009416318,0.0064597,0.0008036368,0.15411317,0.0012783937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2797821,0.00019937471,0.00050496677,0.04270197,0.0063700075,0.7135719,0.011393467,0.00044254956,0.000077085315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5361982,0.00011838125,0.00030516108,0.08452875,0.0015283164,0.4508684,0.0017280995,0.010552014,0.0000031408238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030127436,0.00011435336,0.5556368,0.0000048633224,0.000079203055,0.00002562931,0.0027063524,0.0000019429788,0.009337912,0.049013775,0.085523866,0.29752517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069648295,0.00013788442,0.8197679,0.000020972831,0.000021556894,0.00019788518,0.012789281,0.00008215203,0.00025399914,0.036089532,0.12977278,0.00016955858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006258873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011006867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29735562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040209008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029519068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978536634","doi":"10.1119/1.4731619","title":"Erratum: “2012 AAPT award citations at the Winter Meeting, Ontario, California” [Am. J. Phys. 80, 465–467 (2012)]","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"American Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physics; Physics education; Engineering physics; Library science; Mathematics education; Quantum mechanics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22208958370558715,"score_gpt":0.4624262457321566,"score_spread":0.24033666202656948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978536634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12968832,0.0654133,0.047806323,0.042223286,0.26588163,0.003394995,0.0043415166,0.00021854701,0.44103208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1271014,0.002641115,0.002088779,0.0022417002,0.018479656,0.000034526613,0.00015450288,0.00028188198,0.84697646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981043,0.0009900415,0.0023883826,0.00085006916,0.0131398775,0.0015886192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791746,0.0047250963,0.005673851,0.0017882269,0.007459148,0.0011790345],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016353216,0.00069931796,0.0016877945,0.014626727,0.00082483725,0.002140862,0.006212203,0.00028541472,0.002247748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073037175,0.0004068281,0.0014335904,0.06359044,0.0016187849,0.001531801,0.0015942247,0.0037219226,0.0017948603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004841639,0.0002321425,0.0061168256,0.000007580116,0.00024462538,0.000015666248,0.00094341725,0.00006372937,0.00007579502,0.000057753226,0.9184824,0.073711604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032759778,0.00058225164,0.011239837,0.00009533263,0.00018079007,0.00007998855,0.0010899557,0.00009601966,0.000047162495,0.0038098232,0.98192394,0.00052729197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033170197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40594435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013253307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002388134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978865080","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.07.001","title":"Is there a need for a new journal devoted to preventive medicine?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive healthcare; Medicine; Alternative medicine; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Public health; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.451447446405072,"score_gpt":0.575194997565831,"score_spread":0.12374755116075903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978865080","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19323584,0.004839881,0.7212681,0.051702045,0.004684361,0.0028256439,0.000013001525,0.0000712408,0.021359839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340064,0.00018059276,0.0036632253,0.0014066661,0.0024354677,0.00006813634,0.000008763612,0.00004511242,0.058185637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854389,0.00059581175,0.0021906095,0.0012378918,0.009585884,0.00095088984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830613,0.005901123,0.001521688,0.0012199333,0.006445288,0.0018506689],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0479094,0.00035833707,0.0010381247,0.021136543,0.00042137512,0.00046468375,0.0015824229,0.00015345591,0.003319032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17326073,0.00020615749,0.00035751503,0.05912819,0.00029168883,0.00043791876,0.00048991153,0.00044699005,0.00009376316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090485286,0.000111700705,0.050007433,0.000017674614,0.00012291156,0.00011118493,0.0021939292,0.000009282227,0.0011655876,0.0002797712,0.6659254,0.27996463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025549338,0.0028925636,0.15289463,0.0004982839,0.00013179412,0.0006448766,0.0020079045,0.0011330936,0.0013408439,0.18406127,0.65140134,0.0004384548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002728001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003426908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7407706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018702338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979570114","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0077","title":"Publishing as a Vocation: The Necessity of Independent Scholarly Media","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Public relations; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.3844269601575179,"score_gpt":0.4915914338750796,"score_spread":0.10716447371756166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979570114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92015314,0.0014161449,0.0020321743,0.05699825,0.004447987,0.00016560973,0.000019269344,0.000014276628,0.014753139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398273,0.00010579955,0.003191054,0.0010086008,0.0012398094,0.0000024029991,0.000002322483,0.000018523084,0.00044877644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95872575,0.0010674237,0.0029036838,0.00064744195,0.035855662,0.0008000128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413774,0.028101519,0.008089621,0.0032194986,0.11668246,0.0025295212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21261483,0.00022697628,0.00059452414,0.041537084,0.00075783994,0.4530089,0.016190736,0.00059568015,0.00086708704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7161921,0.00012866216,0.0004425591,0.10595567,0.00032038093,0.37798348,0.0021000146,0.010214766,0.00006177753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107588785,0.0003592859,0.56648666,0.000010819681,0.000103154445,0.00007333895,0.0024687534,0.000022253766,0.02153797,0.018976126,0.07760638,0.31224766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014515658,0.00023147915,0.8081962,0.000060711493,0.00003499417,0.0004597767,0.0055543757,0.00021554477,0.0031889034,0.08723623,0.09309689,0.00027334908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043959534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017027916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017562811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021435402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920687},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1979763623","doi":"10.1080/13614570903001322","title":"Waking OA's “Slumbering Giant”: The University's Mandate To Mandate Open Access","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Review of Information Networking","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Publish or perish; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Internet privacy; Free access; Political science; Position (finance); Business; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Advertising","score_opus":0.5753178833745927,"score_gpt":0.5601029611884042,"score_spread":0.015214922186188473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979763623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029035686,0.03722548,0.26696554,0.026731858,0.0044477736,0.006720481,0.000060944665,0.00015047258,0.62866175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64196134,0.318578,0.01158945,0.019816097,0.0008553507,0.00002129986,0.000053901997,0.00003702922,0.0070875403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396336,0.0001778956,0.0009816993,0.00024623095,0.004224297,0.00040653377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956628,0.00088396465,0.0007288089,0.0007308694,0.0017164288,0.00027713442],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152839525,0.00013063963,0.00038448212,0.0069541237,0.00061600795,0.002369481,0.007224886,0.000045687815,0.00061824644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004279886,0.00008337948,0.00013044641,0.078746766,0.000055348148,0.005777053,0.0042717853,0.00020202028,0.0003984318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014138921,0.0000058864885,0.0027304017,0.00011269102,0.000010541155,0.0000038576145,0.00023891941,0.00044247694,0.0000024643439,0.000653575,0.20042747,0.7953576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022877501,0.000022879516,0.0121570425,0.0009945439,0.0000067688206,0.000017505685,0.00007917173,0.0035612585,0.000024914449,0.0001362868,0.98265284,0.000118033546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022100823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021316871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79523957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012161564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029101653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980290188","doi":"10.1109/acsip.2011.6064461","title":"Impact of research funding on nanobiotechnology scientific production: Does concentration in a few universities make sense?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Nanobiotechnology; Production (economics); Position (finance); Contrast (vision); Political science; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7496887350038993,"score_gpt":0.6074311707504033,"score_spread":0.142257564253496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980290188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98134005,0.0000489199,0.00011731397,0.00039997936,0.0006403564,0.00028286842,0.000010767639,0.000025021081,0.017134698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870796,0.00003109119,0.00032442992,0.0000037367474,0.000022140277,0.0000027010478,0.0000014546338,0.000004614966,0.010901852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99241704,0.00041326036,0.00047836587,0.0007924657,0.005193688,0.0007051671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942472,0.0013851268,0.0001429156,0.00080255995,0.0032600036,0.00016221432],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027003907,0.00010073746,0.00022477565,0.07620916,0.00033895634,0.0006462046,0.0010511051,0.0001549956,0.001054892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00954676,0.0000579585,0.000101315156,0.19530123,0.0012256949,0.00047179233,0.0004119612,0.00037138953,0.00012634805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066381245,0.0015028794,0.6865392,0.000031660933,0.000059793692,0.00015068107,0.0055995723,0.0001549119,0.11373275,0.11347244,0.011655519,0.06643682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00112327,0.0022429076,0.64614433,0.00008859959,0.000004553336,0.000032990665,0.028676078,0.002549597,0.27959186,0.036221012,0.0029053935,0.0004194382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000984633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002443609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1658591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004970299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006351546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980831228","doi":"10.3152/147154302781780822","title":"Do US Congressional earmarks increase research output at universities?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Competition (biology); Instrumental variable; Quality (philosophy); Estimation; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Public administration; Business; Management; Econometrics","score_opus":0.6548266178634141,"score_gpt":0.590624394806003,"score_spread":0.06420222305741108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980831228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77392673,0.0006565427,0.000010981187,0.011295636,0.00021962292,0.00013449599,0.00004445988,0.00002046044,0.21369104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613104,0.00041835805,0.000085126434,0.0007190213,0.00020773809,0.0000048204183,0.0000012388548,0.0000061988026,0.037247106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757745,0.00046985075,0.00039780253,0.0011135534,0.02043226,0.0018119998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98363155,0.0039607356,0.00014836044,0.0010905565,0.008699827,0.0024689394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052281838,0.00015079412,0.00022732113,0.09847669,0.0029662116,0.007179978,0.004241098,0.00011630768,0.0034045302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06596924,0.00010391794,0.00006928962,0.26478153,0.005034984,0.002681775,0.00423573,0.00045655677,0.0013254825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028435481,0.00024439764,0.16653013,0.000005760507,0.0000091357615,0.00006726114,0.0008231889,0.00000314416,0.00087201747,0.06137651,0.43347433,0.33656567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007052226,0.00018778208,0.17054522,0.000010150861,0.0000016015248,0.00007378275,0.0023383277,0.008825029,0.00018110436,0.008144483,0.80869436,0.00029291603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001931156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035126486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37522003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000911843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002710685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994521},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1981934171","doi":"10.3138/cpp.39.1.1","title":"The Canada Foundation for Innovation, Sociology of Knowledge, and the Re-engineering of the University","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21497306306758052,"score_gpt":0.4246659564249422,"score_spread":0.2096928933573617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981934171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36184165,0.0050887247,0.0007378768,0.6188437,0.0020095468,0.0011711353,0.00031077693,0.0000033625474,0.009993248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849382,0.00023697772,0.00003316411,0.00038636941,0.00011153964,0.000006111637,0.0000028462098,0.0000049474206,0.014279823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791837,0.00024170279,0.0003855495,0.0001859497,0.0007206974,0.0005477085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541814,0.007389489,0.0003219399,0.0005912539,0.0059069726,0.00037220534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006455885,0.00008319609,0.00016945474,0.010107758,0.0008303064,0.0003307543,0.0016697804,0.000100288096,0.00011749594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048832536,0.000044980206,0.000056361518,0.075327784,0.0018126462,0.0002920756,0.00024215941,0.00017088614,0.000005051197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022231984,0.000004671741,0.0039134244,0.000012512121,0.000024557985,8.2910454e-8,0.000294117,0.000009259796,0.000011439274,0.75393265,0.1323781,0.10941694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038181062,0.000016113321,0.08726618,0.000006016788,0.0000047940734,0.0000011915431,0.00086717156,0.011132618,0.000017194985,0.012510888,0.88773966,0.000056386376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75536156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008905393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023141671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982037740","doi":"10.1118/1.4735301","title":"SU‐E‐T‐237: Leading 25 in 25: A Bibliometric Analysis of Classics Articles in IMRT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Library science; Scientometrics; Web of science; Subject (documents); MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; Meta-analysis; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.5356024017038159,"score_gpt":0.569783587338663,"score_spread":0.03418118563484707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982037740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839295,0.0011993123,0.01041203,0.00040386253,0.00028712157,0.00012911113,0.000015627944,0.000012561315,0.0036108405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907726,0.00028343027,0.0001670326,0.00014417263,0.00013137369,0.000009137708,0.0000054368825,0.000010828853,0.0001713147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832253,0.00035793727,0.0012873582,0.0005313348,0.013536266,0.0010618375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98888206,0.008434791,0.00029880877,0.0006947972,0.00087294,0.0008166068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030236911,0.00017291357,0.000830577,0.6037561,0.000060277678,0.00038964426,0.0019051908,0.00020865034,0.0007825267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058553394,0.00012646399,0.0002932227,0.94989556,0.0003349894,0.0008676425,0.0006808274,0.00059016806,0.0002098243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062779727,0.0005645858,0.71496576,0.000005508443,0.000036410554,0.000008311685,0.00023581593,0.000047511367,0.00012062601,0.0008432117,0.00091859134,0.2822474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005520267,0.000056208868,0.9689507,0.000020683243,0.000037251062,7.271619e-7,0.00021877888,0.022643719,0.001149393,0.004599522,0.0016019414,0.0001690347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030170573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014512049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34613943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017553633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022751058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983455381","doi":"10.1300/j108v06n02_06","title":"Impact and Publication Patterns: A Model for Examining Resources in an International Context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Data science; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.42326700718571686,"score_gpt":0.5098591079363572,"score_spread":0.08659210075064039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983455381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98698014,0.000054790384,0.0116067985,0.0009129811,0.00012792545,0.00016388099,0.000039024115,0.0000040605123,0.000110384644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986232,0.000051397208,0.001116519,0.00009900787,0.000068844914,0.000004958991,0.000020965208,0.0000016761427,0.00001343594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965099,0.00003355878,0.0009482842,0.00010381607,0.0022240176,0.00018040842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404526,0.00030641846,0.00082255155,0.00009920756,0.0045531997,0.00017335771],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004835057,0.00008370912,0.00016537996,0.011219678,0.000077970966,0.0025496962,0.0006860184,0.00006557098,0.0000127162575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061905156,0.00004351487,0.00007595661,0.008915311,0.00002066668,0.012663791,0.00008034881,0.00015101086,0.0000040025643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024313542,0.0002837813,0.53075725,0.000017357577,0.00007120742,9.693009e-7,0.018050388,0.040582854,0.0014819382,0.0016312123,0.0018153692,0.40506455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012199607,0.00096236105,0.98160577,0.000020562586,0.0000027223032,0.00003971326,0.00334654,0.011586466,0.00010584991,0.0007455536,0.0002888321,0.000075684264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016420083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035036996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45084852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022043876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007819856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983996769","doi":"10.2527/af.2014-0007","title":"Predators and impersonators: A new breed of journals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Frontiers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Breed; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.4025902043520405,"score_gpt":0.5168197438611736,"score_spread":0.11422953950913306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983996769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887596,0.0048130564,0.0022785894,0.0012584846,0.00028179385,0.0001910095,0.0000103418815,0.0000102596205,0.002396886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916067,0.0003234345,0.0055564297,0.00008783331,0.00006298451,0.0000026292669,3.8392804e-7,0.000007743531,0.002351874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481624,0.00008781095,0.00051605946,0.00038949703,0.0037900184,0.00040035028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710554,0.000537697,0.00022555733,0.0003145461,0.0011655365,0.000651098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044373157,0.00010778543,0.0003028821,0.019443816,0.00009850099,0.0012409778,0.0010324318,0.00009024312,0.0012489449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008815991,0.000072973366,0.00010802065,0.044302866,0.0001693329,0.0009885131,0.00031527728,0.00015530243,0.00012251803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019975105,0.00002465854,0.4069414,0.0000021146175,0.00002273126,0.0000020112805,0.00020539969,7.07668e-7,0.00538418,0.00016461234,0.45152307,0.13570915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068136596,0.0005287369,0.95093125,0.000011593241,0.000009925891,0.00001242573,0.0028821614,0.0035496012,0.0024770855,0.014287355,0.024418648,0.00020986797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061447854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036861495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54398984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003301328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015995998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984242254","doi":"10.1108/00012530510599190","title":"Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Order (exchange); Indigenous; Subject (documents); Impact factor; Citation impact; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; History; Mathematics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.836922757864223,"score_gpt":0.6699587625625484,"score_spread":0.1669639953016746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984242254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546375,0.0008199867,0.0022152078,0.0056065125,0.00032199692,0.00075591676,0.00000781543,0.000016643333,0.035618365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923551,0.00007816548,0.004894592,0.000044269065,0.00046281415,0.000046331646,0.0000016087934,0.000012087411,0.0021050116],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789294,0.000120809986,0.0009008701,0.00052683515,0.01891367,0.0006084434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95393014,0.002920743,0.00049040845,0.00024106576,0.04211658,0.00030105954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16484821,0.00009444515,0.00021329396,0.039329227,0.0004899478,0.002125159,0.0017022196,0.00012456685,0.00021897284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10927874,0.000069378664,0.00012852399,0.079520315,0.00017795373,0.0015332376,0.00024031357,0.00037554404,0.00015277925],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006792367,0.0001789847,0.031039935,0.00001726332,0.000016058366,1.6307284e-7,0.0009060045,0.000018049379,0.019211203,0.023580542,0.12668644,0.79827744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003713347,0.0008326613,0.14292318,0.00006755449,0.0000425941,0.0000370397,0.0053429888,0.2751405,0.041421767,0.21843109,0.31169477,0.0003525136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026841594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001935897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79792494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033815444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048630673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985467003","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015","title":"Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"Arthritis Society","keywords":"Citation; Peer review; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.6434841767182838,"score_gpt":0.6626164012696232,"score_spread":0.01913222455133934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985467003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764843,0.0008551791,0.011013417,0.0023120674,0.0015399709,0.000720709,0.000009703058,0.000012709468,0.0070519387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911777,0.0002699466,0.0037514921,0.00007008009,0.0004657496,0.000015952917,0.0000015086135,0.000018154053,0.004229419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94385684,0.0037179862,0.0026882843,0.0006414397,0.048278067,0.00081739336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94895136,0.00920248,0.0011129606,0.00094212475,0.039014887,0.0007761811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21964297,0.00017387401,0.0005573357,0.037831828,0.0005606452,0.0062038247,0.0036817514,0.00014727135,0.0019822924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122385,0.000112051675,0.00033006136,0.08883385,0.00022937081,0.0010219384,0.00034236227,0.0011398286,0.0009101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011314358,0.0016046499,0.7004353,0.000028518876,0.00007833685,0.00001928314,0.0006953826,0.000021938875,0.00061717397,0.0001375799,0.25328386,0.042964853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018478181,0.0023902159,0.91904026,0.00004368998,0.000010715371,0.000062517225,0.0015547663,0.001939101,0.00004110264,0.012124295,0.060786523,0.00015897542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047027766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007094797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.218605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002222409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040675656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986382245","doi":"10.7332/4300","title":"May the odds be ever in your favor: a brief comment on the review games in ecology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Immediate Science Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.5175128813566564,"score_gpt":0.5609093202705826,"score_spread":0.043396438913926194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986382245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256472,0.0029649762,0.000009719103,0.26159808,0.0021423127,0.0009339442,0.000012245266,0.000009461185,0.0066820537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945403,0.0043685837,0.000031150783,0.04934688,0.000091377675,0.00013760946,0.0000010242693,0.000007219169,0.00061316584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896977,0.001445739,0.0010106994,0.00084977655,0.00503144,0.0019646594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814013,0.01584478,0.00035842738,0.0012844199,0.0007062648,0.00040476845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.102460496,0.00020667288,0.0004995157,0.018735642,0.00046315516,0.000515716,0.0059386985,0.00013817532,0.0013805431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06967386,0.00009688196,0.00011480715,0.1253909,0.0021153362,0.0007257537,0.0015998038,0.0007524389,0.0009904302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001725065,0.00050106633,0.83016616,0.00000975023,0.0000046707332,0.000019714407,0.00086351624,0.000027602267,0.00013213695,0.010255943,0.12825106,0.029751126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032042552,0.00017770969,0.85338,0.000020561265,0.000002761897,0.000012932993,0.0006762752,0.00056077156,0.0001356523,0.0015685078,0.14301428,0.00013008743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022215262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065613387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2197558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052104896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006988341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986593070","doi":"10.1029/2009eo240006","title":"Fein Receives Edward A. Flinn III Award","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Social Fund; European Science Foundation","keywords":"Political science; Management; Library science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5251693089797328,"score_gpt":0.5843264562240658,"score_spread":0.059157147244332964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986593070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8219571,0.0017162896,0.011781901,0.015814953,0.0018435762,0.00042970167,0.000024150617,0.00013809804,0.14629424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978886,0.00014663438,0.0014100514,0.00063487724,0.0002277286,0.0000036917004,0.0000024047715,0.000006115598,0.018682493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99110836,0.00015229735,0.00053232926,0.0006524356,0.006953532,0.00060105126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574274,0.0016069915,0.00009535272,0.0008189334,0.00130766,0.00042831502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106173325,0.00013266868,0.00027240347,0.03051656,0.00024077088,0.0017679542,0.0022264076,0.00010966944,0.0010794506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018285818,0.00008940954,0.00015939596,0.118003294,0.00007324837,0.00047686248,0.000253215,0.00025785554,0.0027260887],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025152212,0.00012874667,0.014537442,7.853189e-7,0.0000065202044,0.000028594499,0.00014238415,0.000016988506,0.0017182104,0.0021098591,0.14673053,0.8345548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057282526,0.00039501983,0.37811533,0.000008204514,0.0000039926103,0.000010794074,0.00024392553,0.0022112844,0.004672169,0.039770406,0.5736811,0.0003149627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003431612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060540683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83423984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006555974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011742076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986726592","doi":"10.3152/147154300781782147","title":"Impact of collaborative research on academic science","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Research policy; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.7446807243754998,"score_gpt":0.7166696462433838,"score_spread":0.028011078132116007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986726592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832105,0.0001906876,0.000004783341,0.0034694844,0.00007329052,0.00021595467,0.00004289124,0.000011686706,0.11278072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737036,0.000579678,0.00007398598,0.0001658549,0.0001161199,0.0000082525285,3.0186686e-7,0.0000048949482,0.0016805523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689531,0.00030602855,0.00057451957,0.0012191444,0.027030293,0.0019169546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721659,0.0037367318,0.0001906603,0.0013432,0.020586161,0.0019773922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11105411,0.00014526506,0.0002770204,0.14495985,0.0018360169,0.0040666913,0.006555762,0.00009848775,0.00070725393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13985837,0.00008727179,0.000068768444,0.649469,0.0147226155,0.0034221602,0.00095330365,0.0006162042,0.00041343816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039880197,0.00015290863,0.06106233,0.0000017169568,0.0000040735035,0.0000023048633,0.0007125039,0.000025440495,0.010551439,0.071870156,0.008114133,0.84746313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048204113,0.0015766177,0.9268859,0.000014586676,9.619396e-7,0.000014014526,0.0010894873,0.0032450343,0.0034062257,0.04104366,0.021991756,0.0002497009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00123317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000079212205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86582357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070396485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021440495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946344},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1987191136","doi":"10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y","title":"The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation analysis; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6466000573736542,"score_gpt":0.5889075728966469,"score_spread":0.057692484477007366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987191136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004660159,0.99362445,0.0001471566,0.00014347617,0.0003620552,0.00057276373,0.00009309276,0.00001610328,0.00038076658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019304137,0.9965155,0.0010453173,0.0001382582,0.000039634928,0.00002759182,0.000009366556,0.00003623365,0.0002576757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104136,0.0023705356,0.0015895395,0.00070813036,0.003691372,0.00059908576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796986,0.017128533,0.0015756191,0.0009236476,0.0004175049,0.00025607375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014812196,0.00044353295,0.0012264608,0.03633137,0.0006554323,0.0042903447,0.0024595773,0.00028489862,0.00007056296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013306281,0.00022665784,0.00043157887,0.043644395,0.001093133,0.00061529264,0.000833427,0.00091456564,0.0000142782255],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026206115,0.000096878895,0.0003704651,0.00003919251,0.000217669,0.000005254403,0.0006474132,8.168515e-8,0.00007571693,0.0014426404,0.0010753113,0.99600315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040876245,0.00052542414,0.0012642231,0.00031537822,0.000049692422,0.0001125404,0.0009018557,0.000013883488,0.00007746245,0.0018466992,0.9941917,0.00029234376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006497128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031463944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99571085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011378134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025657742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987570886","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0162-3","title":"The discipline dependence of citation statistics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; National Science Council","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Value (mathematics); Index (typography); Citation index; Scientometrics; Computer science; Data science; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5142649586072647,"score_gpt":0.6001517069820625,"score_spread":0.08588674837479782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987570886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8341965,0.00050621736,0.14780019,0.0011288591,0.0054419166,0.0003842601,0.00030748936,0.00003372031,0.010200854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823861,0.00013040716,0.014079803,0.000025296124,0.00007393467,0.000005067968,0.0000058215337,0.000009736238,0.0032838332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97771823,0.00015070154,0.0010190462,0.0006342519,0.0197705,0.00070729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96844697,0.018998379,0.00063867145,0.001449353,0.009935386,0.0005312515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055365648,0.00013448713,0.00023314428,0.07803998,0.00079306547,0.002939895,0.0046700407,0.000109475885,0.0003254991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27158225,0.00007410849,0.000109825225,0.47606227,0.0008723497,0.0005462879,0.000974177,0.00049582694,0.00029599795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020514288,0.00017640238,0.13462837,0.000005681876,0.000010817009,0.000006222821,0.00021416764,0.00006139318,0.011551148,0.064567596,0.02087903,0.76787865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005558886,0.00025569618,0.78751874,0.0000034288405,0.000010905592,0.000016929742,0.0006101981,0.03280526,0.0072140093,0.09064214,0.080055565,0.00031121864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003567485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012241805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76756746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048531107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029333602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987707043","doi":"10.1136/bmj.h210","title":"Firm action needed on predatory journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":243,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Business; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.7969926508729327,"score_gpt":0.6778639477958661,"score_spread":0.11912870307706658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987707043","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010930368,0.0011370712,0.00011233727,0.0014761891,0.96315587,0.00043780857,0.00035005363,0.000040007213,0.03219762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010181583,0.00051843456,0.00013561628,0.000106479354,0.9289952,0.00003192541,0.000051329735,0.000036376732,0.069106504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9520504,0.00061827985,0.0012438003,0.0010190964,0.044379693,0.0006887168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646193,0.016736165,0.001270443,0.0018281356,0.014537717,0.0010082629],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07453775,0.00030234337,0.0006567832,0.08824164,0.0002552495,0.0059358133,0.00401319,0.0012994793,0.0019130898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37446782,0.00020466674,0.0003103461,0.11510292,0.00010500544,0.000630898,0.0007479962,0.001859084,0.005137558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007796607,0.00007901764,0.0000950033,0.000006105177,0.000021030166,0.000024325727,0.000028125181,0.000018276292,0.000016424443,0.0000052244136,0.9534311,0.046197355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045215653,0.0002922913,0.0004840363,0.000040615676,0.000007792441,0.0000027879018,0.00019614233,0.000192195,0.000052723113,0.001847212,0.9961783,0.00025374032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012517022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020601448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2999301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005909696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022137528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1987881751","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404","title":"Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Computer science; Mainstream; Data science; Citation; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.0943119420156931,"score_gpt":0.41708529981832754,"score_spread":0.32277335780263444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987881751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262986,0.00071648794,0.003908334,0.26718518,0.0004197848,0.0008311432,0.000012184219,0.000046086014,0.000582212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97392505,0.0038243176,0.017564062,0.0040165605,0.000080555415,0.000104640814,0.0000012006733,0.000006664372,0.00047691487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598485,0.000023006945,0.0004926327,0.00031046706,0.0028293002,0.00035976217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205613,0.00078967464,0.0006698381,0.0005548212,0.0058161807,0.00011335195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009871889,0.00009166925,0.00022217349,0.009846158,0.00054886437,0.0017593575,0.0015310281,0.00006338752,0.00007729028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019118318,0.0000549663,0.000094810355,0.099899374,0.0046364274,0.0019040101,0.00087584695,0.00014736544,0.000051506326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037345294,0.000014459614,0.004107902,0.0000085575175,0.0000074538516,7.911154e-9,0.00017740027,0.0000028725326,0.0011044106,0.0044341944,0.2620589,0.7280801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024081623,0.0001838203,0.015252359,0.0000055155556,0.0000051015254,0.000011276252,0.013963953,0.002164726,0.0018293868,0.006579038,0.9596535,0.00011049788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015245448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010776256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058052512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012681028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988983771","doi":"10.4000/rga.457","title":"Services de transfert des savoirs","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de géographie alpine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.34711264679008363,"score_gpt":0.4623903576677502,"score_spread":0.11527771087766658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988983771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90414953,0.06909041,0.006944442,0.010865241,0.0010296075,0.00034047026,0.00009951012,0.00007599967,0.007404773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8363355,0.13237263,0.00927703,0.0006927594,0.00066431344,0.000027197442,0.0000129589,0.000051228468,0.020566424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912588,0.0005218259,0.0009951099,0.0010870794,0.0040230434,0.002114143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930052,0.002183406,0.00018665162,0.0010848147,0.0019813168,0.0015585694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011061647,0.00039951075,0.000662572,0.055879064,0.0009919907,0.0011092311,0.0031230517,0.00046990998,0.0013454752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030306154,0.00036815173,0.00069843046,0.27644882,0.0036426967,0.0010055497,0.00035079892,0.0006899018,0.00065635203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083463325,0.0008601668,0.49001825,0.00047741723,0.00015860966,0.0012092812,0.0035674053,0.00021890434,0.003497536,0.0052656285,0.010611736,0.4840316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011619308,0.000563371,0.6091174,0.00033569144,0.00007347397,0.0017009688,0.0006523779,0.0058777323,0.0017651488,0.022567393,0.3554735,0.000711059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019922853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090623944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48332053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026879006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004964904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989152391","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0030","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989152391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399759,0.0018673557,0.027447408,0.18768564,0.017886538,0.00015140594,0.0000166052,0.00002106909,0.024948038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728379,0.00007627319,0.010628991,0.008525103,0.0068572685,0.0000011294982,9.2183836e-7,0.00002264645,0.0010497492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772671,0.00023577722,0.0014351124,0.0003737762,0.020107837,0.00058040174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97560656,0.0021563761,0.0011511658,0.0005655471,0.019593665,0.00092668046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06278511,0.00014264676,0.00037692513,0.06294875,0.00031232226,0.22701459,0.0059720613,0.00024287544,0.0012071467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16287848,0.00009163632,0.00030958926,0.10457364,0.00009981791,0.1487791,0.0007029858,0.0023027037,0.00043617416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872205,0.00008861729,0.16330764,0.0000018309736,0.000018459175,0.00006997185,0.00013223875,0.00012049767,0.0008719123,0.0003853515,0.8261366,0.008848165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013742992,0.00025991496,0.11503638,0.00004693572,0.000009755914,0.00025290347,0.00078026886,0.000019754501,0.0012546807,0.050061323,0.83071107,0.00019273725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117085925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048647817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23286197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037604923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060946064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989379933","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0011","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989379933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699977,0.1962802,0.0017188931,0.52436215,0.0007604956,0.00049497135,0.000015372108,0.000005700366,0.0063645327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79511714,0.17105702,0.020031953,0.004182219,0.0013785835,0.000015637059,0.000001803535,0.00003797749,0.0081776455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852496,0.0025671704,0.0032985369,0.00067155884,0.053747125,0.0011906603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391637,0.055198006,0.003516924,0.0009978546,0.19895501,0.0021685248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52565306,0.00014143737,0.0006261439,0.07942668,0.0006744935,0.06170676,0.004984965,0.00032127413,0.00011003857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.91775274,0.000094515955,0.00020577176,0.13212532,0.00019543666,0.14717522,0.00094116887,0.007937505,0.000015508258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009224216,0.0001256871,0.0781688,0.000042058495,0.000022074819,0.0002451479,0.0007390864,0.0000072099515,0.0004197471,0.0005883337,0.75155413,0.16799548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011091044,0.00035033637,0.20734921,0.0005675555,0.000010340367,0.0028863966,0.0011337817,0.0001572004,0.000054384567,0.017463572,0.7687802,0.00013796805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000726848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037335158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990144582","doi":"10.1016/s0927-5371(01)00041-0","title":"Co-authorship and the output of academic economists","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Panel data; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.49905064395572674,"score_gpt":0.5310680544386404,"score_spread":0.03201741048291362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990144582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97977453,0.0008187812,0.00018525281,0.0030419964,0.00027295918,0.00016450684,0.000044016462,0.000007809258,0.015690122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98866314,0.003602667,0.00015441075,0.00045550353,0.00010271189,0.0000056834247,0.0000011925708,0.000008294924,0.0070063793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975682,0.00018437277,0.0007772738,0.00043935786,0.0006540331,0.00037676597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935199,0.004870026,0.00038360286,0.0005923821,0.0003761378,0.0002579495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021536773,0.0001102005,0.00036749282,0.008214786,0.00014747403,0.0007218173,0.0017083435,0.00014957426,0.00036012958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009256617,0.00006809863,0.000105053,0.013401721,0.0005141777,0.00035871164,0.00027006137,0.000314987,0.0002467629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000191319,0.000030266347,0.4667228,0.0000053963295,0.000029933279,0.0000025173154,0.00055777654,0.00022595418,0.0000371536,0.40751922,0.0017201204,0.12295753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017560272,0.00004877066,0.23006661,0.0000033432698,0.0000057066513,0.000025282248,0.00030264095,0.003930564,0.00047634228,0.5694342,0.19377686,0.0001736044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009389573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028697243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23665619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053028856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114484494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990436954","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1386-4","title":"Forty years of gender disparities in Russian science: a historical bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.4898121462066615,"score_gpt":0.5481804217127789,"score_spread":0.058368275506117395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990436954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.961884,0.0013173057,0.020420766,0.00017838643,0.001292742,0.0002601983,0.000030842046,0.000036367997,0.014579358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530274,0.0001948203,0.0032134058,0.000079445446,0.000058700727,0.000010883985,0.0000036281226,0.00001527516,0.0011210808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96010697,0.00036187234,0.0018934307,0.0017686631,0.034118418,0.0017506549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827145,0.008040538,0.0008120106,0.0021791484,0.0048983623,0.0013554548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10636593,0.0002678087,0.0010580055,0.9673125,0.0003187365,0.0027875814,0.006775371,0.00021298365,0.00033314273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19493154,0.0002168584,0.0005343935,0.994532,0.00115386,0.001603256,0.0017179346,0.0004808527,0.00012607941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009892534,0.00029458714,0.8801878,0.000008443941,0.000025095718,0.0000052184264,0.00011798891,0.00035992338,0.0001566562,0.004329752,0.00094581215,0.11355882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047813993,0.00014897622,0.9695664,0.0000032480923,0.000038108225,0.0000020944447,0.00006832961,0.017478969,0.00022425748,0.005777599,0.0059449254,0.00026891922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009924469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000649958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1132899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015348381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067945936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990771254","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2012.705139","title":"Four Decades of Materials are Used by Researchers in Mathematics: Evaluating Citations' Age and Publication Types in Mathematical Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Original research; Library science; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.7851492443736335,"score_gpt":0.6170827924943438,"score_spread":0.1680664518792897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990771254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911494,0.0009133313,0.00022757621,0.0053655435,0.000053537355,0.00045084176,0.000014986744,0.00003092764,0.0017938192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98274153,0.000054828637,0.016698638,0.000011249728,0.000009660419,0.000078826895,0.0000014942293,0.0000088514535,0.00039493438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996896,0.00049077795,0.0010164654,0.00064831186,0.0067036306,0.0011718689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062526,0.0064453036,0.0002943271,0.00077138125,0.0016325553,0.00023117893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08341309,0.000119077224,0.00038737955,0.08700055,0.00027827077,0.0018625751,0.002727155,0.00023155323,0.00018975379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20873035,0.0000882368,0.000021637432,0.20422639,0.0052168635,0.0032568928,0.0015432105,0.00046171137,0.000070129296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022758395,0.0004904942,0.43700135,0.000071944705,0.000005747211,0.000007552681,0.0056016995,0.0000036668964,0.19314563,0.3440764,0.0010591571,0.018513594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035783855,0.00014035826,0.10408711,0.00008630137,0.0000016614382,0.0000075243556,0.015914224,0.0012714462,0.10360699,0.7741268,0.00024383825,0.00015590097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032410055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015248145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4300504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011776216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043474455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W199182376","doi":"10.1515/9783110308464-022","title":"Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Citation; Computer science; Data science; Misnomer; Context (archaeology); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.710803390071182,"score_gpt":0.5868286611509752,"score_spread":0.12397472892020678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W199182376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7156013,0.0029403088,0.055320542,0.035650488,0.00663917,0.0014158413,0.00058383914,0.00011993668,0.18172853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792683,0.00051820214,0.00046867583,0.00031812093,0.00046934895,0.000016267057,0.0000070101464,0.00001855068,0.00025696444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987388,0.0008748357,0.0011180864,0.0009474408,0.0091072945,0.00056433264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95560956,0.039320245,0.0010528343,0.000571501,0.0033601471,0.00008569551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025673715,0.00029054412,0.00067144836,0.025816869,0.0006935428,0.00224506,0.0025111751,0.0004122566,0.0002999178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09384891,0.00014027402,0.0003204994,0.052457184,0.00078272814,0.00050126616,0.0033789498,0.00075739133,0.000051386385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011361507,0.000116653195,0.0028406007,0.000072514944,0.00010671467,0.0000030343992,0.037779517,0.0000065473273,0.00038779664,0.35583794,0.013394009,0.58934104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000610507,0.00012232781,0.046469286,0.00013284315,0.00003782334,0.000001531495,0.011508043,0.00044635165,0.0014668012,0.92144185,0.017239312,0.0005233396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003847078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013380264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5888177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014018072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027514095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992101860","doi":"10.5860/crl.75.6.808","title":"Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Sciences?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Discoverability; Publishing; Electronic publishing; Publication; Library science; Open access publishing; Work (physics); Political science; Open science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; The Internet; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.9083715545556956,"score_gpt":0.6707751710001016,"score_spread":0.23759638355559398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992101860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.680805,0.0023470812,0.00019873561,0.059877355,0.00014978196,0.001126331,0.0000614698,0.000025687104,0.2554085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940937,0.00068879843,0.00022698498,0.0005708702,0.000074485615,0.0001829795,0.000005528407,0.000012110261,0.0041445564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98389256,0.0030260107,0.0006243732,0.0009565611,0.010057414,0.0014431056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91929275,0.075502336,0.00024360292,0.0016063865,0.0027506717,0.0006042487],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10620607,0.0001640075,0.00032437526,0.033471484,0.002696973,0.18103082,0.019951308,0.0001069704,0.00047393085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15147915,0.00009221647,0.000056332923,0.1574204,0.0023591218,0.026952155,0.007926215,0.0009222867,0.000026668027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034430068,0.00009404789,0.057272337,0.0000063067664,0.000005296823,0.000011964733,0.0012657366,0.0000044047806,0.000013109833,0.83047366,0.0720902,0.03872852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037705348,0.00035377144,0.14776106,0.000023698407,0.0000017528138,0.000008293185,0.04533485,0.0022911243,0.000119130375,0.6073986,0.1961522,0.00017841485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005982456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068870257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31328863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006308917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023956655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992820609","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.002","title":"Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a “typical professor”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Publication; Accreditation; Scope (computer science); Citation analysis; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6921114392845578,"score_gpt":0.5922830016658597,"score_spread":0.09982843761869808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992820609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713656,0.000046635418,0.002661042,0.004414333,0.00017255956,0.00076169934,0.000059784605,0.00008650326,0.020431854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947718,0.00022122293,0.0024373084,0.00018053067,0.00006549524,0.000086222215,0.0000939743,0.0000074144054,0.0021360577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97743964,0.0003996544,0.0010601709,0.00066249055,0.0193569,0.0010811641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810714,0.002236584,0.00032652746,0.00079870946,0.00765942,0.0008716258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034743365,0.00014393582,0.00021063704,0.06553747,0.002108165,0.010008194,0.0030221352,0.0001415721,0.0004257953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050744418,0.00010282817,0.00006192377,0.19714323,0.0018582882,0.05422264,0.0018176285,0.000686801,0.00075441226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392513,0.00006229197,0.8824547,0.00001888277,0.0000034503034,0.0000034411655,0.0026664978,0.0000095666455,0.00037567504,0.013530761,0.012943362,0.08788742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003283717,0.0001239243,0.95166683,0.000012604359,6.536425e-7,0.000016910864,0.0023000517,0.020553118,0.005112224,0.0032166666,0.016509824,0.00015881739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003832539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015747165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13160576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011150476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012994285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993438223","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080","title":"Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; Genome Canada","keywords":"Data sharing; Compromise; Inclusion (mineral); Special section; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9355392449111711,"score_gpt":0.6068143652781375,"score_spread":0.32872487963303365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993438223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43734506,0.0005097347,0.0064913896,0.18402135,0.006935496,0.0021790308,0.0032771789,0.000386373,0.35885438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652055,0.000057533096,0.0011080091,0.01852374,0.00026436357,0.000016836133,0.000037036098,0.00003948109,0.014747499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892711,0.00050928077,0.00057928986,0.0012720221,0.007736097,0.0006321842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986353,0.0069230627,0.00019869808,0.0045592184,0.0015703442,0.0003956945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958123,0.00019848696,0.00026445676,0.01466469,0.00040360072,0.0021313766,0.010341066,0.00009919483,0.009823359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10737421,0.000105108345,0.00011763962,0.08002657,0.00025443314,0.0008167465,0.003340448,0.00062637666,0.00311637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056129138,0.00022002471,0.0017959726,0.00000177266,0.0000068901118,0.000058612062,0.00015230231,4.007175e-7,0.0038943836,0.0008870875,0.9721613,0.020765113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037121907,0.00028571108,0.10654657,0.000005568674,0.000009051126,0.00000716581,0.00012263293,0.00903228,0.0073058484,0.0016226694,0.8744624,0.00022886963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007035395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044290075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52786046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025034618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105390835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993562201","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.003","title":"Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Accreditation; Econometrics; Publication bias; Statistics; Differential (mechanical device); Computer science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.6028694960870139,"score_gpt":0.5223753468198439,"score_spread":0.08049414926717002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993562201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708526,0.0008300747,0.023130773,0.00043615812,0.00008599652,0.00007504528,0.0000011668034,0.000005476833,0.0045826975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99215126,0.0003894248,0.0070991362,0.00013857576,0.000070401824,5.150214e-7,6.8236346e-7,0.000005723141,0.00014430161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467325,0.0000748926,0.00089155283,0.00018657462,0.0039295717,0.00024417345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897245,0.0038692812,0.001213045,0.00018787346,0.004637379,0.00036792568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02380218,0.00010488248,0.00032028157,0.041538224,0.00023783596,0.0030963866,0.00038572587,0.0000687047,0.0000066634025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058910325,0.000064202315,0.000028292277,0.04789078,0.00014193263,0.0022004764,0.0002952331,0.00027165748,0.0000031680606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001946364,0.000009529494,0.8382184,0.000009234125,0.000009827171,5.6375677e-7,0.00015524906,0.00003325488,0.000013015403,0.0009704842,0.00038444845,0.16017652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092651596,0.00034466645,0.9143086,0.00003148107,0.000011754796,0.00019220624,0.00049017626,0.058356095,0.000031867454,0.0012037498,0.023976535,0.0001263679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017648834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004415027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16005014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004243861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105773055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993945630","doi":"10.1002/meet.2008.1450450292","title":"Author bibliographic coupling: Another approach to citation‐based author knowledge network analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Citation; Field (mathematics); Complement (music); Computer science; Co-citation; Citation analysis; Data science; Network analysis; Information retrieval; Library science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.2625448598870476,"score_gpt":0.4635367526431875,"score_spread":0.20099189275613988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993945630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95463026,0.00008475553,0.03570877,0.0062835044,0.00010739663,0.0007329653,0.000026051659,0.00008277158,0.0023435398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96429664,0.000036598693,0.034775954,0.00059652835,0.000018916766,0.00008723584,0.0000011641116,0.0000050520534,0.00018192953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943614,0.000005219291,0.00070306787,0.00045965295,0.003830691,0.0006399828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861735,0.0005491785,0.00091888476,0.0003499626,0.011812743,0.00019571517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016640618,0.00014343881,0.00041093008,0.07398236,0.0012539666,0.0007304507,0.002885319,0.00009552004,0.0000034176226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012109567,0.00009159311,0.00036249394,0.6851844,0.0037268582,0.0016863621,0.00065687817,0.00018447549,0.0000072998487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006841935,0.0002531656,0.6750106,0.000056288336,0.0002565669,3.086799e-8,0.0039175986,0.00236377,0.004828878,0.036042515,0.21650265,0.06069949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006940954,0.0005834396,0.2765324,0.000014302985,0.00013732127,0.000008468143,0.0141561795,0.585424,0.0044651325,0.0063897604,0.111084536,0.00051034504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016883212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.408984e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61120206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007791966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000373612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994503791","doi":"10.5596/c09-014","title":"Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Scholarly communication; Library science; Descriptive statistics; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.2608889313194788,"score_gpt":0.5256096575731364,"score_spread":0.26472072625365756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994503791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87128186,0.018970346,0.00024937218,0.10507864,0.00082670595,0.0005190283,0.00022517543,0.000010101607,0.0028387883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97805774,0.008013017,0.0023622422,0.010525334,0.00051509775,0.0000038225767,0.0000011602691,0.00001847598,0.0005030806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98580265,0.0065058735,0.0014892109,0.000266232,0.0045308843,0.0014051545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97634417,0.01248715,0.0041089635,0.0002992118,0.0037153976,0.0030451121],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08775364,0.00015430349,0.00047661833,0.008551533,0.0028971606,0.018964132,0.0032580711,0.00019947274,0.000107020554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0570129,0.00011518571,0.000094795665,0.017592497,0.00011230165,0.0037488644,0.0007385888,0.0014953583,0.0000010656851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021710508,0.000029671828,0.8428284,0.000019259307,0.00007498652,0.000022691262,0.007837139,0.000041193558,0.000005804208,0.0032805013,0.14070089,0.0051377686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047140883,0.000116603354,0.89148235,0.00009112595,0.00000769979,0.00022741347,0.0029666421,0.00084929354,0.000030679188,0.06483949,0.038805313,0.00011197479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7167337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7925296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106775925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016344203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06806367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995474731","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1211892109","title":"No evidence that equations cause impeded communication among biologists","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Computational biology; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7756343136281035,"score_gpt":0.5762885286466921,"score_spread":0.19934578498141142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995474731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1626465,0.0064593544,0.000051744635,0.7912139,0.00053523236,0.0018468578,0.00034170275,0.00006206985,0.036842633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972811,0.00072105054,0.0011517808,0.020913778,0.0005208246,0.000039363196,0.0000017990716,0.000010520876,0.0038298797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774518,0.00014358465,0.0011976251,0.00077651034,0.019825045,0.00060541334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702728,0.016956078,0.004234247,0.0001160978,0.008276814,0.00014398457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043868143,0.0002526138,0.0004903498,0.018215872,0.00072674773,0.00094802136,0.012685369,0.00070496916,0.00022092726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13956855,0.00014196975,0.00031526186,0.065885656,0.004108581,0.0027949621,0.0022286102,0.0015264296,0.00007566561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010039106,0.00006007317,0.09019497,0.00006969936,0.000038853996,2.963627e-8,0.0001360593,0.000016330589,0.006861514,0.004769089,0.89629114,0.0015522123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049956574,0.0003308703,0.53871137,0.0012580812,0.00013321145,0.000024337158,0.0004892146,0.0067688166,0.038378034,0.20416157,0.20803492,0.0012100135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008852016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.802127e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8101645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018147795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020451493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996751905","doi":"10.1136/bmj.326.7383.283","title":"Quality of impact factors of general medical journals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8130175992207538,"score_gpt":0.6988940944208675,"score_spread":0.11412350479988631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996751905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5828218,0.0027005032,0.0015485659,0.38738143,0.0027875605,0.0006254235,0.000988912,0.000012877849,0.02113292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5683382,0.0024957568,0.004364406,0.34724322,0.01222168,0.000032943495,0.00023632088,0.0002050369,0.06486242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95222265,0.0017767835,0.003137939,0.00065174774,0.04147056,0.0007402996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784847,0.011995723,0.0024189479,0.0014040702,0.0051671476,0.0005294142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0732812,0.0002544426,0.0013432729,0.06275988,0.00006517148,0.0005186412,0.0040432583,0.0011111747,0.015825532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1970472,0.00014110941,0.0009966308,0.1088952,0.0003606318,0.00020465822,0.0004923512,0.0016771732,0.00007218886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061404635,0.00004802843,0.10272893,0.000016801245,0.000053713207,0.0000381125,0.000019445319,0.000003278394,0.00010677406,0.0000120618915,0.89069587,0.0062708324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055229914,0.00026353393,0.38405067,0.00005153794,0.000012669064,0.000031030708,0.00007031456,0.00014963695,0.0010429381,0.00401816,0.6093481,0.00040908263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077785674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008131537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28134775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111667425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001479019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98507416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965557","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450440262","title":"All‐author vs. first‐author co‐citation analysis of the Information Science field using Scopus","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Co-citation; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Data science; Mathematics; Library science","score_opus":0.20870721170239293,"score_gpt":0.5037997684738248,"score_spread":0.29509255677143187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865288,0.000012706778,0.0069731483,0.0051017464,0.00015129699,0.00044933322,0.000025169778,0.000021013471,0.0007367675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927917,0.000026223988,0.0064349696,0.00071477564,0.000007118848,0.0000091076845,7.085925e-7,0.0000019589443,0.000013431981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224776,0.000004624692,0.0009947715,0.00026552624,0.005926056,0.00056128285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376864,0.0008146413,0.002214182,0.0003785149,0.012696068,0.00012795907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031213937,0.00011512518,0.00032176173,0.027350545,0.0012487395,0.0009065881,0.0034705652,0.00009169534,0.0000037074901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041308947,0.00006639062,0.00025360956,0.33322352,0.0058488473,0.0071115866,0.000922472,0.00019760024,0.0000018318738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012157171,0.000081052785,0.48028627,0.00010457394,0.00018146935,1.9852976e-8,0.010512316,0.00026534134,0.06445412,0.055264566,0.005996168,0.38273254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006414678,0.00055711373,0.4037954,0.00004478172,0.00023438729,0.000010876328,0.057763003,0.1833401,0.32010427,0.006130435,0.02698224,0.00039591384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010297815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038319804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38233662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021899206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004959635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998549090","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.020","title":"Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery: A bibliometric analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Orthopedic surgery; Elbow; Citation; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Relevance (law); Medical literature; Library science; General surgery; Surgery; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.5958593857592792,"score_gpt":0.5445401648114354,"score_spread":0.0513192209478438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998549090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98944855,0.0016618104,0.0009463119,0.0023406893,0.0034204028,0.000054285832,0.000028638471,0.000010206218,0.002089135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997272,0.0012299127,0.00022211102,0.00031164204,0.00036991035,0.0000026445157,0.000010254521,0.00001196388,0.00056956947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781635,0.0005536415,0.0024310686,0.00046124542,0.017844023,0.0005465276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642996,0.021958178,0.0016058701,0.0004363596,0.010818448,0.00088151736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05520804,0.00019376683,0.0009527948,0.8581865,0.00005030198,0.001970705,0.0021698119,0.00014942116,0.0010149181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12973616,0.00013749611,0.001110654,0.8504017,0.0001300602,0.0012587502,0.00036961655,0.0004829114,0.00010992874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010894796,0.00018686212,0.8065811,0.0000010547507,0.00028535444,0.00073356787,0.000051655737,0.0003724343,0.000032249256,0.000021909671,0.023143074,0.16848183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000387509,0.00003390789,0.9577398,0.000024119305,0.000036807403,0.00010897927,0.000323427,0.0019718183,0.00004799244,0.0007134779,0.03843963,0.00017253224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001839227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040132432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1683093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004508436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013364091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998590636","doi":"10.1007/s10464-010-9374-1","title":"Understanding Interdisciplinary Collaborations as Social Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Community Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social network analysis; Institution; Sociology; Centrality; Public relations; Social network (sociolinguistics); Psychological intervention; Network dynamics; Health psychology; Field (mathematics); Dynamics (music); Population; Public health; Social science; Psychology; Social capital; Political science; Medicine; Pedagogy; Nursing","score_opus":0.7427404181271681,"score_gpt":0.651328028731233,"score_spread":0.0914123893959351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998590636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938176,0.000030431238,0.06961023,0.0152991805,0.0016127134,0.000053386713,0.000005137916,0.000007953865,0.019563377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758965,0.00003849513,0.0009076459,0.0011082079,0.00025225244,0.0000010244506,0.000001144385,0.000009502749,0.000092058086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947242,0.0017501039,0.00085305714,0.00013246342,0.0021607252,0.00037940996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98986644,0.005651134,0.0010380935,0.00066280295,0.0024603223,0.0003212012],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021446861,0.000112170084,0.00043413084,0.018079268,0.0011227729,0.0006725391,0.003303896,0.000101424775,0.0004874938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00711415,0.00008379281,0.00018107297,0.07015275,0.0014614357,0.00039172362,0.0007972034,0.0026124313,0.000051837596],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000773205,0.0017112556,0.060419377,0.0000020582788,0.00022669714,0.00009087367,0.014133648,0.00024024819,0.0050510857,0.023682697,0.31148037,0.5821885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023478256,0.007472905,0.4677993,0.000012875462,0.000042778407,0.0014467759,0.1063952,0.0011765626,0.00005231894,0.34533405,0.0673775,0.00054189895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030754192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001363026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58164656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086622334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002115315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998888254","doi":"10.1186/s13047-015-0070-0","title":"Worldwide productivity in the field of foot and ankle research from 2009–2013: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foot (prosody); Productivity; Gross domestic product; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Population; Demography; Ankle; Geography; Library science; Environmental health; Economic growth; Economics; Surgery","score_opus":0.7032713158779151,"score_gpt":0.6259661561505094,"score_spread":0.0773051597274057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998888254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627278,0.026126878,0.00015340853,0.009512827,0.00013395537,0.00033830482,0.000049101294,0.0000020222622,0.00095568923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296117,0.0060601267,0.0003722674,0.000030532447,0.00023186323,0.000005181186,0.0000013240806,0.0000099568915,0.00032757455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692019,0.0040257717,0.001957039,0.0006467319,0.023149567,0.0010189677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92806417,0.046836432,0.0009895009,0.0010686619,0.022121271,0.0009199647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.207721,0.00018275806,0.0010909631,0.64713997,0.00030487575,0.001970784,0.003076476,0.00020467663,0.00018298965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15180759,0.00010443748,0.00028972258,0.8205484,0.0008492005,0.0010545944,0.001173838,0.0020363485,0.0000060119132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005848127,0.00081173284,0.775825,0.000026563945,0.00031729334,0.000096669166,0.0011180809,0.00005649345,0.00594251,0.00012418295,0.051190954,0.1639057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298414,0.0020706826,0.96383226,0.00009247535,0.000063154206,0.000026263802,0.003280697,0.0016610847,0.0038974963,0.014114139,0.009516105,0.00014724614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029980969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006096822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18800724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012150863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083567464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000638786","doi":"10.1258/135581903322405108","title":"Convergent evolution: The academic and policy roots of collaborative research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Health Services Research Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.47665753135336614,"score_gpt":0.6811280939698202,"score_spread":0.20447056261645408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000638786","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036555745,0.33081383,0.00014588008,0.15850161,0.45612198,0.0057761194,0.0020387205,0.000026687536,0.010019414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17367762,0.19962193,0.00025582532,0.0006135746,0.6195986,0.00006511053,0.00002037346,0.000120819575,0.006026135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8873322,0.021434523,0.005757768,0.0013397483,0.08029803,0.0038377258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65021354,0.14085735,0.009663013,0.0042757355,0.18941069,0.0055796774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29859647,0.00045974093,0.001898539,0.16376162,0.0021586355,0.0022906421,0.010241928,0.0013329209,0.00016768358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17637128,0.00026834517,0.00035224672,0.30758822,0.0023000943,0.0010762556,0.0031474011,0.011519491,0.00008432983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000277239,0.00017128045,0.0011397824,0.00046070406,0.000101743986,0.000019191733,0.0024820752,0.000014085241,0.00010139001,0.0031817567,0.97487605,0.0171747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010603174,0.0021540397,0.0057444973,0.0005693696,0.000007190194,0.000029338478,0.010604451,0.00012711925,0.000069545946,0.029727304,0.94970894,0.0001979165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013101524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037403242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23711866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003434749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07902559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001213194","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0295-4","title":"Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Forschungszentrum Jülich; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"China; Regional science; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Library science; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Political science; Point (geometry); Geography; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5650881049249804,"score_gpt":0.5968205699851685,"score_spread":0.03173246506018812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001213194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833241,0.0005808174,0.0014479689,0.0011715897,0.0051320046,0.0010336011,0.00081985816,0.000027412581,0.006462665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96881086,0.00022279513,0.028839646,0.000019878415,0.00011991809,0.00008564748,0.00009371714,0.000022370878,0.0017851877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738749,0.00045442168,0.0015780524,0.002153784,0.020705216,0.0012335865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959282,0.013308792,0.0006086323,0.0017252322,0.023922266,0.0011530975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10445518,0.00027000444,0.0005653087,0.75205237,0.0008316996,0.010614284,0.004762477,0.0002945154,0.00038835325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19600609,0.00019275086,0.00011686228,0.90742224,0.0014585081,0.0025958137,0.0014709235,0.0007297994,0.000058443784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104961255,0.0009815342,0.77835584,0.000017766657,0.000024058038,0.000011200485,0.0013997176,0.0000057024963,0.022391524,0.0071590734,0.008865267,0.18068333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018494697,0.0003344311,0.82489455,0.000033791544,0.0000071375925,0.0000067617993,0.0050660954,0.00395097,0.0074052797,0.043177497,0.112805925,0.00046809696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020445864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010398943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18021524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029817995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012464792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904128},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2001302201","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.131","title":"Publishing as a Vocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Ideology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Service (business); Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Public relations; Law; Social science; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.5157213604975961,"score_gpt":0.5415540772126118,"score_spread":0.025832716715015747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001302201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73254323,0.003291417,0.011426373,0.1518081,0.002255953,0.00015827574,0.000006372567,0.000034008706,0.098476246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886027,0.00012886531,0.005261632,0.0033766185,0.00095749414,5.510788e-7,0.0000017362248,0.000009808678,0.0016606025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722163,0.0005081642,0.0019342834,0.0004842266,0.024183504,0.0006735376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459733,0.004458832,0.0024871281,0.0009289947,0.04473691,0.0014148828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12752986,0.00016258807,0.00042518362,0.076472804,0.0004126253,0.5350269,0.007939667,0.00033182232,0.0003907697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5986823,0.00011172844,0.00032374958,0.14033465,0.000055447577,0.39901203,0.00046464516,0.0030922985,0.00013078211],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842362,0.00016793003,0.038625203,0.0000015915532,0.000019640633,0.000082333136,0.00041055938,0.000047425783,0.0026780148,0.010978588,0.22082254,0.72611773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014592003,0.0008813133,0.41078317,0.000069539456,0.000017041231,0.0005725854,0.0022340966,0.0007044958,0.0008780383,0.27859673,0.3034954,0.0003083788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036803488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035780887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009703819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001642110","doi":"10.1080/08109021003676367","title":"The immediate practical implication of the Houghton Report: provide Green open access now","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Publishing; Order (exchange); Yield (engineering); Scientific publishing; Political science; Library science; Positive economics; Economics; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6062874221191252,"score_gpt":0.6517568788808888,"score_spread":0.045469456761763616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001642110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87123394,0.00018769075,0.0012116012,0.09995388,0.0021984726,0.0027160824,0.00003736113,0.00002515098,0.02243581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869616,0.00009574726,0.0018229857,0.00011445204,0.00014230303,0.00015829374,0.0000021331189,0.000014744887,0.01068771],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152774,0.0004124041,0.00094165077,0.0006699425,0.005965314,0.00048292888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828847,0.00962387,0.0011691108,0.0026975402,0.003372687,0.0002521099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044513527,0.0001238842,0.0002467776,0.005158667,0.00056134484,0.006149222,0.011925528,0.00012020318,0.00017709767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14257962,0.000051311716,0.0001400735,0.08818019,0.0004506782,0.0016266669,0.0065439716,0.00064398267,0.000119525816],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009607757,0.00035850212,0.21974935,0.000011475708,0.000042583724,0.000018084289,0.00018379686,0.0000018440484,0.032099694,0.006261154,0.050205693,0.69097173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029805192,0.00007432816,0.46230268,0.000004724637,0.000011109225,0.00009235412,0.00006640507,0.000655952,0.035854444,0.08575395,0.41474956,0.00013643503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006013779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003388554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6908353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036859245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085001625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99488246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002166221","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1432-2","title":"The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Political science; Order (exchange); Production (economics); Business; Economics; Nanotechnology; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.3818642461742465,"score_gpt":0.49254159140057985,"score_spread":0.11067734522633332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002166221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788197,0.002534238,0.0014822212,0.013594344,0.0024526354,0.0004928039,0.00002901905,0.000016684047,0.00057832774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985254,0.00012993813,0.00018028186,0.00006269413,0.000036306585,0.000022515074,0.00000717613,0.000009703729,0.0010260092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804521,0.0008089694,0.0014116334,0.0011484269,0.014596118,0.0015827271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816681,0.009484132,0.0005485455,0.002112684,0.005655602,0.00053094456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10047732,0.00017970991,0.00038638143,0.17397282,0.00094775046,0.003646784,0.0058815535,0.00011147395,0.00004983498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16267467,0.00009889924,0.00006184533,0.75051457,0.00074204174,0.00039214277,0.0013338703,0.0005529416,0.000033291948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012552317,0.00012439626,0.72753334,0.000004821248,0.0000050101316,0.0000013615087,0.0005351916,0.0065490208,0.00025813532,0.0042599034,0.016334828,0.24438141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025157566,0.000116481635,0.086358584,0.000013552526,0.0000017191693,0.000002089018,0.0075999144,0.060755022,0.002283325,0.0035446684,0.838903,0.00017008197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07146944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64787954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008641114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011056543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002849679","doi":"10.1087/0953151053585019","title":"Open access — the impact of legislative developments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Research Councils UK; Wellcome Trust; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislature; Stakeholder; Political science; Period (music); Regional science; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.83959312744279,"score_gpt":0.6915954124791795,"score_spread":0.14799771496361047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002849679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5077345,0.00030673327,0.0017396052,0.0155556835,0.00026424174,0.0005188594,0.000028624492,0.000021290774,0.4738305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072033,0.0000312401,0.0012787392,0.00026801726,0.00010196855,0.00001064606,0.0000046823156,0.000009637863,0.007574731],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911994,0.0004315288,0.00070353795,0.00059748,0.0064756316,0.0005924426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988146,0.005099672,0.0005522285,0.0009378558,0.0032342775,0.00029450058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03733446,0.00013065015,0.0002896088,0.01836566,0.0003795916,0.082923375,0.02143931,0.000099487814,0.0022104676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097914375,0.000064286636,0.00016195189,0.14605366,0.00013993181,0.027700521,0.009483739,0.00052041915,0.00018879007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027314169,0.00008295602,0.24358739,7.848329e-7,0.00004083739,0.0000015337667,0.0010288511,0.0011023842,0.00009861907,0.0014443832,0.1356288,0.6169561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006716347,0.00007043559,0.82233804,0.000011300827,0.0000030006413,0.0000050437493,0.00057380623,0.00584574,0.0006984433,0.013388748,0.15619987,0.00019395567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031925703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001389556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61676216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021684222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008494798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003199334","doi":"10.1108/ajim-11-2013-0127","title":"A multidimensional analysis of Aslib proceedings – using everything but the impact factor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Originality; Strengths and weaknesses; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Qualitative research; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3448193613516742,"score_gpt":0.5221124057526471,"score_spread":0.17729304440097288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003199334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89303803,0.00004043939,0.10385294,0.00026548497,0.00015967575,0.00015496385,0.000010870645,0.000004393451,0.0024731825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099505,0.00004175266,0.008693502,0.00012965192,0.000033996563,8.191119e-7,0.0000016343739,0.000003369419,0.00010021227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908152,0.000090129884,0.0015735863,0.0001192552,0.0071096197,0.000292171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920178,0.0011024855,0.0020871763,0.00025457592,0.004347492,0.00019045867],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019283798,0.00012270389,0.00038045913,0.048431005,0.0001975626,0.0011390435,0.0013698834,0.000047725007,0.0002796827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050742594,0.00006202102,0.00046416672,0.071593314,0.00006683101,0.003247347,0.0004163671,0.00020450422,0.000028626631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024760683,0.00027063504,0.25618714,0.00006187118,0.0035384856,0.0000057245106,0.0041049244,0.14019649,0.0013262539,0.010862238,0.013563589,0.56963503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005258638,0.00015577204,0.48930243,0.000023127845,0.00017394825,0.000010217943,0.0023475438,0.49873087,0.00031224958,0.0009944327,0.007313857,0.000109693174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004875846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.8448204e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56952536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014799385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007418356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003282201","doi":"10.1038/nj7369-419a","title":"The athletes of science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Psychology; Medicine; Physical therapy","score_opus":0.544480304666041,"score_gpt":0.577908947804228,"score_spread":0.03342864313818694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003282201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8170926,0.0065977816,0.00017050549,0.0009205522,0.0016377432,0.0001552694,0.00001042462,0.000014924721,0.17340022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972121,0.00012325202,0.0007623456,0.00010391145,0.000025017724,0.0000013965393,6.7383134e-8,0.00000216352,0.0017697262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070555,0.000050049035,0.00026336865,0.00031016904,0.008327616,0.00034325637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992767,0.002288851,0.00013755463,0.0007487512,0.003903481,0.00015436333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024360169,0.000050872735,0.000094292816,0.016480707,0.00044924332,0.0005397223,0.004590221,0.00023362423,0.00021508784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062444475,0.000022406328,0.00006549085,0.19612396,0.0014594394,0.00032997294,0.00059465284,0.0008189312,0.00010548654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034794175,0.0001097591,0.10993263,0.000002182938,0.000008248551,0.000005705618,0.00074007845,8.2922566e-7,0.010576893,0.13692641,0.05259164,0.6890708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017626827,0.00014561386,0.6661342,0.0000054861944,0.0000021779983,0.0000041282037,0.00081340095,0.0005854305,0.07164614,0.09659609,0.16377608,0.000115028255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015721358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050811004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6889558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021944881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021124014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99466664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004098455","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6","title":"Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: the case of biotechnology in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Network structure; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Knowledge management; Field (mathematics); Network analysis; Biotechnology; Business; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.11364746930551028,"score_gpt":0.46945445948011494,"score_spread":0.35580699017460465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004098455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970747,0.00081252377,0.00008144907,0.00050734694,0.00030354943,0.0005588941,0.000025069447,0.000007662398,0.0006287817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995803,0.00018631513,0.00012709483,0.000014592612,0.000013313213,0.000012615712,0.000001521015,0.0000040527066,0.000060164373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953133,0.00035616598,0.0006361364,0.00045993508,0.0027985687,0.00043588757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895739,0.0077330503,0.00034464564,0.00060070213,0.0016248319,0.00012286937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01540162,0.00013040802,0.00034576523,0.050631985,0.00017534694,0.000285279,0.0011286217,0.00019247769,0.00009330339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034254946,0.00006740615,0.000030724907,0.43146506,0.00055149745,0.00024350305,0.00044861136,0.00030889813,0.000007501409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022861559,0.00003863651,0.2841277,0.00002394552,0.0000051092957,0.000011504054,0.00006510794,0.0009922805,0.0009183518,0.0016643254,0.0018649116,0.7102652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001534187,0.0029500036,0.74033695,0.000049916896,0.000016602158,0.0001227433,0.0017516516,0.15079904,0.09668067,0.0025941497,0.0028054256,0.0003586424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053702876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07347152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7099066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032988153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97387993},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2004681724","doi":"10.1108/14666180010382563","title":"Trends in publishing academic grey literature: examples from economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Grey Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Electronic publishing; Work (physics); Grey literature; Library science; Academic community; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; The Internet; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.30387528167475375,"score_gpt":0.49843165783108323,"score_spread":0.19455637615632948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004681724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594584,0.005862918,0.00005057919,0.013979431,0.0030812048,0.00007854687,0.0006251316,0.000024441639,0.016839325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97495043,0.005258521,0.0007504426,0.0032315152,0.0028404302,0.0000054723228,0.00027534278,0.000027552986,0.01266028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906743,0.00039437998,0.0013773933,0.00089454034,0.006025652,0.0006337257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922208,0.0023628045,0.00047101837,0.0005247868,0.003836918,0.00058362936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008603161,0.00030818334,0.00040018695,0.056948584,0.00018515499,0.04768123,0.005498464,0.00053376035,0.0058733365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011521611,0.00021817104,0.00035478506,0.049640667,0.000072360446,0.00891969,0.00030013092,0.0033875243,0.00030101996],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003215637,0.00013998932,0.043326806,7.948307e-7,0.00006237298,0.0006051724,0.0013634918,0.00048248027,0.00009772706,0.0026714257,0.06618006,0.8847481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016120486,0.00011771134,0.26588082,0.0003178637,0.0000041789217,0.00033042693,0.0000839404,0.0025611196,0.00012714541,0.062680505,0.66591483,0.00036941734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004549248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003641477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045805215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014859474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004997499","doi":"10.1080/00210862.2012.703486","title":"Iran's “Twenty-Year Vision Document”: An Outlook on Science and Technology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iranian Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Ranking (information retrieval); Plan (archaeology); Investment (military); Regional science; Political science; Economic growth; Geography; Computer science; Economics; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.5430716102093517,"score_gpt":0.6059603007241307,"score_spread":0.06288869051477897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004997499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98370945,0.004193117,0.00004092321,0.0027686185,0.00088662666,0.0002508611,0.000007963026,0.00006386006,0.008078581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972187,0.00056858745,0.0007775107,0.00021400157,0.00011706354,0.000011604412,2.596124e-7,0.000009701203,0.0010825358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900096,0.00012019394,0.00043598493,0.0008269821,0.0076346933,0.0009725448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944655,0.001180441,0.00014942358,0.00085117045,0.002855346,0.00049815903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022950616,0.00018663093,0.00035879642,0.044390578,0.0009844258,0.0012530275,0.001690247,0.00009143392,0.000083440405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027488038,0.00011821774,0.00004123716,0.11710867,0.0018034412,0.0017386725,0.001399541,0.00024175968,0.00061174383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056835754,0.00043522406,0.505756,0.000012666458,0.000044382567,0.000014284907,0.0026025586,0.0000018383485,0.006592068,0.024190817,0.015648112,0.44464517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022017232,0.0029335232,0.72991943,0.000067057284,0.000031585772,0.000036168163,0.03183107,0.00023276563,0.009636995,0.0397348,0.18242413,0.0009507356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000979852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007842425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44369444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016835681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079777805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005092147","doi":"10.1097/bot.0b013e3181aa2182","title":"Leading 20 at 20: Top Cited Articles and Authors in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1987-2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Web of science; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Library science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.27155190953005054,"score_gpt":0.4721341778059648,"score_spread":0.20058226827591424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005092147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98400855,0.008081583,0.0012339109,0.004373572,0.0008802565,0.00017651115,0.000009975836,0.000005745011,0.0012298782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616265,0.001256128,0.0009759951,0.00044381164,0.00054333475,6.259438e-7,6.327763e-7,0.000012910274,0.00060391636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847377,0.001020162,0.0028631776,0.00035028547,0.0102083385,0.0008203142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897801,0.0045338534,0.0018798442,0.0004601319,0.0025047653,0.00084129244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05920968,0.00026777934,0.000799485,0.039164636,0.0003186226,0.001014268,0.0022215862,0.00021423884,0.00049192575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016237704,0.00014982844,0.0005440692,0.06184925,0.0003160508,0.0012267603,0.00015037162,0.0013574952,0.000025931518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005046412,0.00038272823,0.37641725,0.000007893218,0.000039127008,0.00071525364,0.001715688,0.00020516048,0.0014598452,0.000087573164,0.03250254,0.5859623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043154764,0.0026155119,0.9491983,0.00014789379,0.000075976364,0.0024087585,0.0036337308,0.0015258584,0.0007758856,0.002942165,0.03206716,0.0002932798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013127615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065125576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58566904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001904866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027781882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005315027","doi":"10.1007/s11051-012-1060-9","title":"Nanotechnology research among some leading OIC member states","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nanoparticle Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Islamic republic; Annual growth %; Middle East; Index (typography); Islam; Political science; Agricultural economics; Geography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.8297510743152176,"score_gpt":0.6750296303968406,"score_spread":0.15472144391837694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005315027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987287,0.0055677807,0.00010661742,0.0047062323,0.0006861231,0.00026800449,0.0000043143996,0.00001765997,0.0013562741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446666,0.0009115995,0.0004290038,0.00003332086,0.00061551796,0.000012580237,3.3708386e-7,0.000029280656,0.003501725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.96148866,0.003774947,0.001776509,0.00055670965,0.028879615,0.003523575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584323,0.02085821,0.00047417148,0.0011740406,0.017274065,0.00178719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25739956,0.00018185365,0.0006221313,0.08135228,0.0009693666,0.0022998345,0.004471114,0.0002962555,0.0010634515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11351673,0.00012050066,0.00025411558,0.15734291,0.0017020525,0.0036475314,0.0020117846,0.0029295008,0.0023176349],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024520102,0.0012564233,0.5232125,0.000022602197,0.00008228633,0.00022655075,0.0013670139,0.00012035943,0.24755578,0.007774575,0.12395748,0.09417927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022627255,0.0028548182,0.14797257,0.00011786308,0.000017097631,0.0003586263,0.009749796,0.00428413,0.56061035,0.09670422,0.17452377,0.00054403825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008959431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012807542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3752399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063266867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063072616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005360619","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1501371112","title":"Reply to Margalida and Colomer: Science should strive to prevent mistakes, not corrections","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Center for Research Resources","keywords":"Mistake; Index (typography); Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5928842124102478,"score_gpt":0.5447901255417091,"score_spread":0.048094086868538666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005360619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13278778,0.00028354564,0.000008597835,0.84653336,0.00040440678,0.0013398128,0.00041781762,0.000020395315,0.018204309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64171726,0.000064646425,0.004460416,0.338774,0.0008861916,0.00009154395,7.4047165e-7,0.00002270652,0.013982536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642588,0.000043792326,0.0011447684,0.0015499869,0.03228288,0.00071980926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366845,0.0025560085,0.001174145,0.000081857346,0.012018753,0.000500777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046700403,0.00026930904,0.0005504805,0.036996424,0.00082489563,0.001676277,0.009053429,0.0003163842,0.000057784306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085948005,0.00016551674,0.00015470825,0.16155168,0.0030078765,0.0010785236,0.0021017867,0.0010735977,0.000028665581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001528841,0.000048521644,0.0021690454,0.000022205571,0.00000969837,7.527413e-8,0.00022098992,0.000039834835,0.009525404,0.0008242376,0.98380554,0.0033191345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019597581,0.0004974855,0.027384445,0.0001576652,0.00002234897,0.000026175965,0.0006910451,0.00056665525,0.07248444,0.023932094,0.87359476,0.00044691504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007438089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.6345384e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50892943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040584768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086767046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006242952","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.007","title":"Death of a Small Journal?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Citation; History; Recipe; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6375061667817558,"score_gpt":0.5179158316989042,"score_spread":0.11959033508285155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006242952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570916,0.0036204278,0.011953519,0.01103209,0.0015272213,0.000115223,0.0000043387163,0.0000053584454,0.014650164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771862,0.00041781686,0.019897804,0.0004032099,0.0005543592,8.6332625e-7,2.2130155e-7,0.0000137805555,0.0015257513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98032653,0.00053686195,0.0024093136,0.00026858304,0.0158773,0.0005813911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.920997,0.005593712,0.0038112518,0.0006925387,0.06743026,0.0014752231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095818155,0.00014274019,0.00054792163,0.072009265,0.00027070317,0.19747521,0.007158888,0.00022308202,0.0012529914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33231595,0.00008551744,0.0004505574,0.07514573,0.000082732986,0.12344801,0.00076390273,0.0028216927,0.00009593195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026150032,0.00021193514,0.63712376,0.000008525702,0.000078798264,0.00007550298,0.00033653874,0.00006516387,0.0040772995,0.0017086323,0.11156931,0.24471839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016375092,0.00081746955,0.7507422,0.000115305076,0.000025633279,0.001295023,0.0022842004,0.0007787687,0.0012356492,0.14034998,0.1004594,0.0002588818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001316369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019672866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24445951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001891675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007997171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006476814","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0006283","title":"Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Affect (linguistics); MEDLINE; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6961187704027095,"score_gpt":0.5726476699662775,"score_spread":0.12347110043643206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006476814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98109025,0.0022079465,0.00011640132,0.00905173,0.00018977841,0.00053859566,0.000009983218,0.000023136412,0.0067721535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979956,0.0018252485,0.0014626003,0.00061168603,0.00015943138,0.000032454813,0.000003210832,0.0000060791667,0.0060997372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897659,0.0002795401,0.000744971,0.0005158126,0.008227531,0.00046629025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301076,0.001091952,0.0002472459,0.0007721328,0.0045598983,0.0003179861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021362552,0.0001075329,0.00035969785,0.03929529,0.00010609963,0.0023155785,0.001490395,0.00009963505,0.0025642472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07301611,0.00005594714,0.000100214755,0.12865347,0.00004084323,0.0009459943,0.00015514367,0.00031394692,0.0007185751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011886046,0.002498748,0.5932249,0.000006992118,0.000009745293,0.0000122780675,0.00005696519,4.9670234e-7,0.008593416,0.00020288728,0.01576779,0.37961394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028638233,0.00019414727,0.97967225,0.00007438376,0.000014165756,0.0000011331848,0.00003201253,0.0002567795,0.0068961736,0.0044944,0.007922304,0.00015588902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013666156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007772527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38644737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108533655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076524855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006611611","doi":"10.1007/s12109-007-9010-6","title":"Assessing the Diffusion and Impact of Grey Literature Published by International Intergovernmental Scientific Groups: The Case of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publishing Research Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Publication; Publishing; Citation; General partnership; Scientific literature; Library science; Systematic review; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.2842349238444869,"score_gpt":0.4885530279506889,"score_spread":0.204318104106202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006611611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98513544,0.0003596038,0.000259974,0.009917356,0.00047754496,0.00052727386,0.000231752,0.000003959168,0.0030871073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884635,0.000029088666,0.000036800127,0.0000443641,0.00008544485,0.000009684582,0.000012436077,0.000011420859,0.00092441944],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755006,0.0014110856,0.00106532,0.0007157514,0.020558057,0.0007492028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721277,0.019425044,0.0007551896,0.0019084199,0.0055374997,0.00024615144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14591675,0.00018410014,0.00026106503,0.0052308184,0.0010256978,0.026283786,0.005807994,0.00011978124,0.0004862047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059805717,0.00006473277,0.00025532936,0.037130952,0.0021755695,0.0038888939,0.0021522222,0.0013155477,0.0000034502114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005035162,0.001751538,0.20367602,0.000047814134,0.00026084128,0.00011759135,0.021496369,0.000027182488,0.051545434,0.008622476,0.2613182,0.45063302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019018054,0.0021551566,0.8746379,0.0002399634,0.00002108678,0.00033547744,0.064623564,0.013030553,0.0035882297,0.028376374,0.010751708,0.00033820156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017459777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027169602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67096186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082018925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045037278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007038115","doi":"10.7553/77-2-59","title":"How to overcome some of the challenges that African scholars are facing in conducting informetrics research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Limiting; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.729042384110194,"score_gpt":0.4777192867828101,"score_spread":0.25132309732738384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007038115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857778,0.00091727317,0.00048738078,0.0037070818,0.00042483868,0.00023591954,0.000021707672,0.0000047614353,0.00842322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980129,0.00023139367,0.0015410219,0.00012890773,0.000027881857,0.0000020333248,6.415414e-8,0.0000034288357,0.00005236268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793846,0.00022850547,0.0011049662,0.00023319398,0.009844666,0.00065018964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913577,0.0016527828,0.0014683894,0.0005222747,0.0044597103,0.0005391799],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04153808,0.00012605709,0.00036521547,0.055713512,0.0005784435,0.0042129788,0.0036540055,0.00006966038,0.000019119605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076602176,0.000070842434,0.00009492192,0.12888983,0.0013462948,0.034022585,0.0015588475,0.0006608503,0.000005908144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022436201,0.00010523468,0.51829743,0.00007486417,0.000022087857,0.000007818038,0.24126045,0.00015315141,0.0006125155,0.09449897,0.0006745763,0.14406854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055141683,0.00051812956,0.5741422,0.00009685201,0.0000034093189,0.000027398568,0.39251626,0.00031905994,0.007291151,0.011700042,0.012621666,0.00021243043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024970292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020621574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101564496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083653023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007457296","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.12128","title":"Bien ancrée, mais à la conquête de nouveaux sommets : la croissance de l’AUC","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19783529150550716,"score_gpt":0.4526165855803671,"score_spread":0.25478129407485994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007457296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6964675,0.035302624,0.009637533,0.20362388,0.0046140384,0.00031530278,0.0005055498,0.000039250826,0.049494304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769683,0.003320451,0.0013580808,0.005179158,0.0011522716,0.000007678872,0.0000044315298,0.000020558957,0.011989068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884227,0.0029544607,0.00085346506,0.00045264268,0.004077472,0.0032392591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98142815,0.009395169,0.0007102878,0.0003064956,0.002347184,0.0058126976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061097912,0.00027583007,0.00047114358,0.01578372,0.0010206403,0.004407275,0.0018233979,0.0011024062,0.004311153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062168498,0.00023029336,0.00034445964,0.045525223,0.0004082668,0.001225775,0.00021159076,0.0021110876,0.0009928055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011286233,0.000121060955,0.76565355,0.000002956898,0.00004825335,0.00020837662,0.00034933802,0.0000861667,0.00003600516,0.0033998676,0.16006014,0.07002301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003491765,0.00008593374,0.5112321,0.000010437999,0.000017717164,0.00047581448,0.00018968315,0.00092908647,0.000018994648,0.0055825813,0.48094127,0.00016722744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043894425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079827145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32088113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046660034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036433563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008693071","doi":"10.1108/03074800510587354","title":"Participation in the global knowledge commons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Library World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Developing country; Interoperability; Originality; Dissemination; Public relations; Business; Publishing; Information Dissemination; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Commons; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.5602271843494625,"score_gpt":0.5868514926554681,"score_spread":0.026624308306005595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008693071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37465644,0.0019242462,0.00026143424,0.043567937,0.00030088445,0.00023292711,0.000017025777,0.000044761873,0.57899433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97666585,0.000019127783,0.0005499374,0.0010620154,0.00030070465,0.000008290202,0.0000043214422,0.000004716134,0.021385057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957888,0.00035503812,0.00045472232,0.00034111322,0.0026371016,0.00042318253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961487,0.0028060789,0.00007883228,0.00061027054,0.00009496093,0.0002611633],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004000229,0.00009044565,0.000143481,0.013195,0.000119643555,0.0020815583,0.0023819616,0.00003799041,0.0027026315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022515042,0.000051422954,0.000078378995,0.21129167,0.00006494156,0.0017463833,0.0004155655,0.00020070761,0.0016550254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070368505,0.00011924138,0.359265,3.4152933e-7,0.0000011195165,0.0000024861688,0.00012732607,0.00003261996,0.0000013016504,0.015006251,0.35473773,0.27069956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017569911,0.000016814043,0.45775172,0.0000021648045,7.9687237e-7,6.731915e-7,0.00003572844,0.0013985008,0.000046242985,0.013956765,0.5265685,0.000046420202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036476828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014061761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6020094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046292185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020720201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010214524","doi":"10.1007/s10508-006-8990-1","title":"The Impact Factor: The Archives Breaks From the Pack","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Impact factor; Environmental health; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.3252310240052838,"score_gpt":0.5420066977776841,"score_spread":0.21677567377240026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010214524","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24701305,0.015448365,0.0007695554,0.001881125,0.6908805,0.0031291316,0.028532442,0.00009528095,0.012250581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36791304,0.0027992474,0.00038892747,0.000053532178,0.5956859,0.00031621906,0.0010572319,0.00020483366,0.03158105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807414,0.0013979938,0.0015312332,0.0012959532,0.013818282,0.0012151479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8215157,0.17314014,0.0010973503,0.0032462007,0.00066252076,0.00033807976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058470536,0.0006071442,0.00080626394,0.0074664485,0.0014652307,0.0043218397,0.014256302,0.00036877382,0.00021907792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022502024,0.00021364338,0.00066824764,0.022926053,0.003055476,0.0002528209,0.0027457257,0.002361629,0.00013269525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000763923,0.00015349944,0.01331919,0.0000021603157,0.00007337405,0.000007367903,0.0006115281,0.000006007767,0.000649801,0.000026413967,0.66063905,0.3244352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038637922,0.0004271783,0.38774598,0.00001854301,0.00008612799,0.0000019262754,0.0009154757,0.00014143334,0.00014842593,0.0046312567,0.60517323,0.0003240262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076341904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006924638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000974128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011285045","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.195","title":"Two-Faced at the Interface: Meditations on the Manuscript Review Committee","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Interface (matter); Process (computing); Research integrity; Editorial board; Academic integrity; Library science; Business; Political science; Management; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Economics; Operating system","score_opus":0.5769549932795691,"score_gpt":0.5507350731102838,"score_spread":0.026219920169285316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011285045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25594494,0.047038402,0.0013918907,0.64754003,0.0028034726,0.00039639062,0.000016876023,0.000012948456,0.04485506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941926,0.013858981,0.00066593336,0.025777476,0.00093045796,0.000011977623,0.0000021281846,0.000026310085,0.016800739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795683,0.0014513342,0.0015069441,0.00033607165,0.016628724,0.0005086198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608668,0.020018728,0.0017219888,0.001370577,0.0154664675,0.0005554468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1334789,0.00015990526,0.0003722883,0.014387374,0.0011094928,0.08865302,0.008462537,0.00009884459,0.0023329868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35897157,0.00006499588,0.00034240703,0.08559931,0.0001927245,0.033552803,0.0011920106,0.0029838386,0.0004214953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020859157,0.00005562776,0.010231111,0.000004688233,0.000030853087,0.000026739126,0.00017306402,0.000040795574,0.00026865653,0.0013569015,0.94034284,0.04744785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005105642,0.00019359507,0.028766837,0.00035124455,0.000025526035,0.00028051343,0.0018973243,0.00019040235,0.00015660003,0.009202949,0.9582977,0.00012668683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042586154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043286822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68598104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033478907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011442237","doi":"10.1017/s1551929510991177","title":"Impact Factor, My Donkey!","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Donkey; Statistic; Phenomenon; Impact factor; Publishing; Factor (programming language); Scientific publishing; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; History; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4094731391342617,"score_gpt":0.6032809874793786,"score_spread":0.19380784834511694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011442237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855875,0.00019491905,0.0016009663,0.00067591376,0.0016601152,0.00017676648,0.00012328898,0.00004690926,0.009933625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989888,0.00003567661,0.0025153542,0.00022275861,0.00017875695,0.000005739062,0.0000046521554,0.000017949224,0.007131119],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923846,0.00011783227,0.0005845996,0.00080154533,0.0052207178,0.00089072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941528,0.0020452633,0.00018102503,0.0012469777,0.0016495377,0.00072440115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007942581,0.00020956222,0.00032381652,0.026433209,0.000319408,0.0035789376,0.0029840318,0.00022320753,0.013134796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013872607,0.0001288094,0.00028084076,0.08812535,0.0002414886,0.00059612223,0.000616804,0.00072564185,0.004705829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013407722,0.00011318781,0.39255145,9.965054e-7,0.000008350125,0.000008147309,0.00008492169,0.0000015270773,0.47455347,0.000108701846,0.050657045,0.08189881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003775587,0.00019623144,0.6743965,0.00000234586,0.0000021421736,0.000013776423,0.00003210131,0.0002992454,0.06355191,0.0023431655,0.2585351,0.00024991643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023683828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004903598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41100153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007547658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027901444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012533003","doi":"10.1128/iai.00018-09","title":"Is Peer Review Censorship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Infection and Immunity","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Biology; Virology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5778104572087954,"score_gpt":0.6152475294336978,"score_spread":0.037437072224902335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012533003","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001493002,0.028235277,0.00013041635,0.004689601,0.9272352,0.00046548597,0.00023822734,0.00007416896,0.03743866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002850473,0.38093248,0.00009232038,0.0023292275,0.4616806,0.000026363992,0.00029759292,0.000043904965,0.15174705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816131,0.00082862354,0.0008217234,0.0006692092,0.015630309,0.00043704445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736232,0.0070827114,0.00052960287,0.0013484128,0.017015202,0.00040083978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044914093,0.00026698672,0.0006463098,0.022777697,0.0004938613,0.0025604796,0.0012066695,0.0007161511,0.00221997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25331953,0.00018986092,0.00027674227,0.07098044,0.00014142117,0.0004699534,0.0005295242,0.00196047,0.00092252984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053918034,0.000057892474,0.00063386845,0.00006270674,0.000010197255,0.0000015112242,0.000020063007,6.395668e-8,0.000003088155,0.000009770741,0.89824516,0.10095028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001861901,0.00016024314,0.01420888,0.00019848047,0.000019270703,0.0000035236,0.0000068941526,0.000016085633,0.000017129638,0.0013990056,0.9835652,0.00021908444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010225547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003239796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46555457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013367378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031466136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013123505","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.257","title":"The Relationship between Scholarly Communication and Science and Technology Studies (STS)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Scientific communication; Perspective (graphical); Publishing; Social science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Science communication; Science studies; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Science education; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.7096535341488244,"score_gpt":0.5563160358039946,"score_spread":0.1533374983448298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013123505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052243,0.036188163,0.0001998634,0.057316054,0.00019758042,0.00008852539,0.0000021810408,0.000010056637,0.00077324745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99187195,0.0039694,0.0036458292,0.00011221807,0.00009029694,0.0000016507289,1.4412683e-7,0.0000058398346,0.00030268426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854823,0.0004829689,0.0011861552,0.00038253993,0.012005773,0.00046026972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8778169,0.04135305,0.0019354918,0.001386627,0.07671497,0.000792957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14834894,0.000107508116,0.00029772363,0.042982463,0.004621019,0.1372951,0.0051499135,0.00017460648,0.0000024392452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76110333,0.00006095584,0.00004380025,0.12465587,0.0025742014,0.14725116,0.0022741454,0.0027236599,0.000005800057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050882754,0.0000096306885,0.93851566,0.0000013952314,0.0000138732275,0.0000054127354,0.00038765714,3.5198343e-7,0.00015899054,0.008961585,0.004802091,0.047138248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032176,0.0001069777,0.89079434,0.00002828333,0.00000741467,0.00022348901,0.0036755304,0.000024505605,0.00006266813,0.0894918,0.015190607,0.00007263924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015059118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006171421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024805355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086377445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013259214","doi":"10.1016/s1359-6446(04)03232-5","title":"Cite and oversight","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Drug Discovery Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical sciences; Drug discovery; Engineering ethics; Business; Chemistry; Medicine; Pharmacology; Engineering; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.30718249709904144,"score_gpt":0.485560715432567,"score_spread":0.17837821833352557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013259214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013600203,0.004181911,0.0008449135,0.9382829,0.002935127,0.0004894081,0.0006840966,0.00005481213,0.03892663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0259093,0.0012839865,0.00024487288,0.7010736,0.003274519,0.000024724606,0.00018880259,0.00008372376,0.2679165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983464,0.00029838324,0.00081302,0.0016593278,0.0127317095,0.001033533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99213403,0.0047887038,0.0004186061,0.0014484518,0.0009095633,0.00030066087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00765138,0.00043041253,0.0007162409,0.05071716,0.00031023702,0.010155432,0.003114017,0.000620733,0.0009341453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008384174,0.0002905474,0.00035275496,0.07553607,0.00039540158,0.0018485672,0.0015845409,0.0019100822,0.0010283298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062793065,0.000026403593,0.002106365,0.000019473797,0.000025226618,0.00037475268,0.00007224726,0.000009106917,0.000013046073,0.00034339304,0.9919078,0.0050959256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003521432,0.000038991802,0.0040893108,0.00003764354,0.000014184673,0.000018361714,0.00005166922,0.000044792137,0.000090274676,0.022772284,0.9720768,0.00041355385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021763395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012639538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23720932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027826198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005173916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013512258","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.006","title":"A Short Note on Pointless Reference Formatting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Multitude; Simple (philosophy); Envelope (radar); Computer science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.605079677102337,"score_gpt":0.5426055041927842,"score_spread":0.062474172909552816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013512258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93026733,0.00036910851,0.005103605,0.013708515,0.0010598953,0.00015446189,0.0000071311574,0.000015599093,0.049314365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924616,0.000066948174,0.005122301,0.0010696115,0.00037142762,0.000002608704,8.8052525e-7,0.00001346576,0.00089114066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.976742,0.00035779143,0.0017298546,0.00041025362,0.02003178,0.00072830584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569783,0.006283614,0.0012806867,0.00084924756,0.033342943,0.0012651773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07596217,0.0001711931,0.00043035345,0.06041689,0.00041078316,0.25885367,0.0064852317,0.0002591302,0.00058022526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24801648,0.000106311236,0.00023956614,0.08131204,0.000069362104,0.16456713,0.00094892335,0.0032569417,0.0004957925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644716,0.00011566596,0.09339108,0.000004745265,0.00001970753,0.000038977072,0.00025118454,0.00004959726,0.0026086743,0.0016723347,0.09862162,0.80319995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011469955,0.00081116724,0.81897897,0.00020051117,0.000014517415,0.00034182472,0.0030685717,0.0040697125,0.0017881941,0.041178912,0.12790942,0.0004912301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000870842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039599868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80270875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030648173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013594586","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2008.00004.x","title":"The Canada Research Chairs Program and Social Science Reward Structures","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5843960452577228,"score_gpt":0.5376209272109905,"score_spread":0.04677511804673229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013594586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5155168,0.38333163,0.000002951934,0.09243207,0.0024779588,0.0014218051,0.00070677645,0.000018055433,0.004091938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81066984,0.1827712,0.0003169447,0.0027521995,0.0004875542,0.00014222166,0.000025233714,0.000032251824,0.0028025366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857304,0.0026413398,0.0014748311,0.0015756272,0.0024018453,0.0061759683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765148,0.009666808,0.0005924899,0.0012455456,0.008540147,0.0034401966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064278506,0.00045985455,0.0012287665,0.00842529,0.007875474,0.0003619147,0.006174033,0.00077119836,0.0002611022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08450685,0.0003489998,0.00031182845,0.039776906,0.03991243,0.00032918667,0.0009184078,0.0024593407,0.000025523179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014326605,0.000043935557,0.08204273,0.0020560343,0.0001385734,0.0006653539,0.007766298,0.0000030482777,0.00005343278,0.1054372,0.33105943,0.47071964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026550802,0.0004206136,0.24277562,0.000564614,0.0000375927,0.00029673678,0.01867215,0.00013048318,0.00001006309,0.024312388,0.71199024,0.0005239913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87404346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.966336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47019565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010203298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06754185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014684096","doi":"10.1523/jneurosci.2891-06.2006","title":"Why Open Access to Research and Scholarship?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarly communication; The Internet; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Open science; Internet privacy; Political science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.9152765418193911,"score_gpt":0.7236138818332203,"score_spread":0.19166265998617082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014684096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97373295,0.00022563012,0.0021124966,0.018226914,0.0007687212,0.00024288753,0.0000059169597,0.000003097012,0.004681397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947741,0.00007780839,0.0010066436,0.0023510703,0.00012594083,0.0000020716502,4.094816e-8,0.0000060767325,0.0016562532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98429406,0.00042542373,0.0007798465,0.00057664,0.013304136,0.0006199018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887848,0.0031379827,0.00032720092,0.0005240118,0.0065103015,0.00071569363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05743743,0.000088802124,0.00025712783,0.048509963,0.0005653643,0.03386934,0.0147831235,0.000044422148,0.000078811965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069922484,0.000056333476,0.00005229825,0.18901607,0.00040219098,0.006774352,0.006694683,0.0005916211,0.000036376598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101795165,0.00040077462,0.38046145,0.0000032955218,0.0000012279277,0.00027449333,0.00004414928,0.00017196574,0.14628154,0.0025171041,0.42546666,0.044275556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020932309,0.0005752754,0.71892893,0.000011125932,6.6507e-7,0.00011958464,0.000026681826,0.00016604437,0.0026977784,0.03220616,0.2449862,0.000072247574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014940623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037249298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33846745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007144543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003539307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99054736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014988080","doi":"10.3166/ria.23.133-153","title":"ERS, une plate-forme bibliométrique. Présentation d'une plate-forme web de mesure bibliométrique des revues en informatique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d intelligence artificielle","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2564065870589194,"score_gpt":0.4863341707415813,"score_spread":0.22992758368266192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014988080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6269642,0.020070361,0.27701518,0.037699416,0.0038823157,0.0026951488,0.0003911196,0.00038911827,0.030893106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8952998,0.062608376,0.0121886665,0.00093637814,0.00079263886,0.0000698771,0.00009198124,0.00008294077,0.027929334],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98445076,0.001077634,0.0038777126,0.0017751458,0.0055676484,0.0032510923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844221,0.006244931,0.0012808007,0.0018928216,0.004456126,0.0017032522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029065788,0.000987478,0.0013057246,0.17417333,0.0013505045,0.0061932304,0.0044796346,0.0013385059,0.0024592448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017968096,0.00089251937,0.0007844296,0.52800727,0.0011281102,0.0064604143,0.0007138216,0.0019419312,0.0044586086],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037143187,0.0012294659,0.015211241,0.00047892475,0.00012960468,0.00034614347,0.019122267,0.035491753,0.012837517,0.00945682,0.08283599,0.82248884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058459025,0.002204662,0.014203349,0.0010734563,0.000085730455,0.0005613395,0.0120934965,0.58771235,0.10570634,0.075480044,0.19855306,0.0017415688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022226365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075306674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82074726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001112505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016217895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015995283","doi":"10.1002/asi.22642","title":"Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of <scp>R</scp>ussian science (1993–2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Promotion (chess); Foreign language; Citation; Visibility; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Web of science; Computer science; Profit (economics); Library science; Political science; Business; Mathematics education; Psychology; International trade; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.18620499551599962,"score_gpt":0.5090815274079213,"score_spread":0.3228765318919217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015995283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929277,0.00022429836,0.00013880906,0.0060862927,0.0001430286,0.00026232816,0.00000996301,0.0000045663724,0.00020306607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992192,0.00015208023,0.0003968895,0.00018438876,0.000017049251,0.000007659819,2.4986707e-7,0.0000017717598,0.000020726107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965069,0.000065979984,0.0004143396,0.00016867626,0.0024715276,0.0003725296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934424,0.0042501166,0.0024207989,0.00035297204,0.0034943484,0.00013750225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049391143,0.00008807881,0.00020794293,0.013964907,0.0007420049,0.0015321304,0.0014163009,0.000042979766,0.0000011672942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09525522,0.000036991445,0.00007811025,0.090195805,0.005802278,0.0045930087,0.00039843185,0.00022998996,0.0000010925947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026897404,0.00007693271,0.34871766,0.000019647456,0.00002612206,5.812503e-8,0.0104528265,0.000008850763,0.072339274,0.006277756,0.00482614,0.5572278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043006724,0.0013516041,0.8954759,0.000027244505,0.000009673051,0.00006515901,0.06131513,0.005227887,0.027574334,0.0017810927,0.0066685085,0.00007334922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023779829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043046125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5571545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012012008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003936737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016535985","doi":"10.1140/epjti1","title":"EPJ Techniques and Instrumention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3086645967070091,"score_gpt":0.5418377791957488,"score_spread":0.23317318248873975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016535985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95946985,0.00023474553,0.008460107,0.0012426316,0.00016291678,0.0005443746,0.000012573831,0.00022879193,0.029644033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732267,0.0014128567,0.024264785,0.00014558088,0.00011872215,0.000051571045,0.000013266462,0.000012768294,0.00075374974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962005,0.0001828397,0.00056209345,0.00060288125,0.0021339739,0.0003177182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832964,0.00038023008,0.00024429616,0.0003518486,0.00048617934,0.00020779543],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070650955,0.00016474015,0.00023115039,0.011152037,0.0003147101,0.0015841718,0.00043184805,0.00014636494,0.00012807049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010916718,0.00012665823,0.000053115557,0.013912353,0.00020276796,0.0011775029,0.0003735956,0.00017625983,0.00001911087],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001257232,0.000027692722,0.020873206,0.0000071019967,0.0000036715633,0.0000014883093,0.000058376398,3.0192986e-8,0.0023491087,0.007875269,0.0013828704,0.9674086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009966828,0.0017655811,0.04643281,0.00007230269,0.00001822238,0.00015103407,0.0005877767,0.0026839883,0.27295387,0.11915441,0.5545945,0.00058878126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012063168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008865633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006414079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026033353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017301591","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y","title":"Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Scientometrics; Impact factor; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Library science; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Information retrieval; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Data mining","score_opus":0.7601598960034236,"score_gpt":0.7056378674837388,"score_spread":0.054522028519684795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017301591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.767471,0.00037595988,0.2202187,0.0005489162,0.0016291613,0.00028688824,0.000020132225,0.000026743823,0.009422479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943737,0.000032312993,0.0034286114,0.00029727924,0.000285818,0.000008771955,0.0000058856936,0.00001376486,0.0015538674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526649,0.00096714275,0.0012019225,0.0011959639,0.04262906,0.0013410222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96919125,0.0067912093,0.00063861394,0.0016940971,0.019049495,0.0026353227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22129287,0.0002464309,0.00057242514,0.5435105,0.00078729034,0.012955809,0.004299265,0.0001318257,0.004085271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3109278,0.00015952822,0.00074695185,0.85212326,0.00011818832,0.0013021724,0.0008898209,0.00042614908,0.001649343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012722144,0.00010420107,0.3140946,8.1168747e-7,0.00012539465,0.0000033650667,0.00017929112,0.0137634305,0.000345959,0.00022168357,0.019117672,0.6520309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004173702,0.00030360947,0.76743525,0.0000027060487,0.00012616227,0.000014166719,0.00010484914,0.19967523,0.00015971845,0.004045449,0.027452677,0.00026282275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004039085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011384209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.651768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009269925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003741275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999128},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2017314821","doi":"10.4033/iee.2010.3.4.c","title":"Measures of journal quality should separate reviews from original research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich","keywords":"Impact factor; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Systematic review; Computer science; Psychology; Citation; Data science; MEDLINE; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.8259416477983577,"score_gpt":0.6719235061480927,"score_spread":0.15401814165026495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017314821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923331,0.0031896217,0.0006431317,0.00088825845,0.0010558545,0.00016672298,0.000011025162,0.0000034188909,0.0017088685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719113,0.0012881398,0.0009371272,0.00003102249,0.000142493,0.000008185563,0.0000010835056,0.0000029894143,0.00039780122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924521,0.0021250988,0.0010372603,0.00045200926,0.0034237779,0.00050977943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022883,0.0061124335,0.00033970663,0.00044874713,0.0026117305,0.00025857604],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.109174706,0.00008580258,0.00038665335,0.018561758,0.00032080192,0.00030676316,0.0009438217,0.00026607566,0.00036618728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0844448,0.000058969403,0.000078691904,0.03402875,0.0005833751,0.00040810846,0.0002775946,0.0012894443,0.00016878557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006922252,0.00008700351,0.95881146,0.0000029037014,0.000005009407,0.0000050494004,0.000061368875,0.000007906892,0.005388741,0.0070765335,0.005485109,0.022999706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027470326,0.0000913865,0.76429796,0.0000054820734,0.0000018585869,0.00001024006,0.00008930844,0.00034866636,0.00014111082,0.20997044,0.024715722,0.000053109532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079714064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003645452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20289391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011049716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033380947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017705528","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.024","title":"Honorary Authorship: Frequency and Associated Factors in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Articles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medical journal; Rehabilitation; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Multivariate analysis; Listing (finance); Meta-analysis; Family medicine; Psychology; Physical therapy; Internal medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.3108499366026114,"score_gpt":0.5288937105166406,"score_spread":0.21804377391402918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017705528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97532356,0.0005007895,0.000046573015,0.022488479,0.000048186976,0.000558952,0.000006214515,0.000012204162,0.0010150564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885523,0.00007219018,0.0008315381,0.000031153188,0.000098949844,0.000032719192,0.000006038244,0.000009492576,0.000062682215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378717,0.0013848287,0.00068702013,0.0006963652,0.0030211727,0.0004234645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86497194,0.13336283,0.0001743739,0.00031628154,0.0007887389,0.00038580678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078836735,0.0001707001,0.0005865521,0.015105284,0.00017304358,0.00011247529,0.00033020196,0.00007465181,0.000029800518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18824299,0.00009957513,0.000070561895,0.019549109,0.004192921,0.0006559128,0.0002528737,0.00044712846,0.000004903652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053677137,0.0005825558,0.6351087,0.00013641735,0.000018543933,0.0000012259902,0.10032603,0.0000038404123,0.043505855,0.02014555,0.001459671,0.19865793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005196349,0.0031138447,0.5622532,0.00015232517,0.000004716384,2.3483287e-7,0.011553275,0.005497485,0.000047848156,0.4167687,0.00002606821,0.00006272327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018525547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006157042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39662313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031243104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004674699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017899036","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008","title":"Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":563,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Double blind; Representation (politics); Ecology; Identity (music); Behavioral ecology; Psychology; Sociology; Biology; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law; Pathology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.5917575747767884,"score_gpt":0.6109837434372497,"score_spread":0.01922616866046134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017899036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839092,0.002841331,0.0018847999,0.0010672351,0.0006283435,0.0002869504,0.000008958694,0.000019461022,0.009353744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703234,0.0005823386,0.0005891784,0.000062056664,0.000046579626,0.000016757986,0.000023938444,0.000006900825,0.0016398822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936743,0.00045376134,0.0013549236,0.0006786135,0.0032231614,0.0006152611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474233,0.0025064037,0.00055718643,0.0006694484,0.0013034866,0.00022113718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032422397,0.0001279334,0.00047765247,0.05536337,0.00010775222,0.00007810782,0.0010097008,0.00022699533,0.00078118755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012676919,0.00010437351,0.00016340094,0.16638194,0.00023718203,0.0004279642,0.00025777917,0.00029138336,0.00012977367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035321247,0.00028850773,0.91915506,0.000016221811,0.000009661486,0.000010208054,0.00005559244,0.00006262197,0.00026227918,0.0013793735,0.0053132093,0.07309403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023286485,0.00016006539,0.99271595,0.00003472664,0.0000134169795,0.000008205097,0.00018193776,0.0006913257,0.0005671031,0.0023430898,0.0008524381,0.000103065206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055517786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012614988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11101857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035961135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013730972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018405970","doi":"10.7202/1008150ar","title":"Famili@ et la recherche sur la famille au Québec (1981-2005)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Enfances Familles Générations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.7135625326729512,"score_gpt":0.6031056219254692,"score_spread":0.11045691074748198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018405970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.269086,0.05146861,0.010511851,0.011257853,0.004892599,0.0006353657,0.0004759299,0.00013469858,0.65153706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73865426,0.019942584,0.00759465,0.000804722,0.00081226404,0.00012481723,0.000044919834,0.00007462997,0.23194717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824852,0.006483054,0.0014238688,0.0011748185,0.0060757785,0.0023572855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379763,0.05708627,0.00047057684,0.0013957241,0.0016089877,0.0014621228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05400721,0.0005547411,0.0007337859,0.016900076,0.0010697328,0.0026120923,0.002660831,0.0010729466,0.001124195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06464183,0.00048507878,0.0004991438,0.06541815,0.0011993671,0.0035686325,0.0009759303,0.0018777883,0.003361987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043656222,0.001899018,0.2206959,0.00005551991,0.00018269566,0.000030154357,0.0144358,0.0005235492,0.0009209007,0.16100743,0.09307345,0.50713193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005952119,0.00010743468,0.108512804,0.00006592602,0.000040943763,0.000039938328,0.004614571,0.0027824324,0.0002037335,0.0049893484,0.8774504,0.0005972294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0713509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044150386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.784377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017129473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006032438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018606774","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x","title":"Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Medical education; Family medicine; Medicine; Psychology; Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.3774473548546129,"score_gpt":0.648830954288741,"score_spread":0.27138359943412815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018606774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073730886,0.040711384,0.011252671,0.8602573,0.007845983,0.0017351592,0.000011497503,0.00001558907,0.004439517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83713377,0.055998188,0.0032845505,0.08280919,0.002976678,0.000689048,0.00005950309,0.00004074101,0.017008368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769248,0.00025647954,0.001052616,0.00032104884,0.021170707,0.0002743612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95566076,0.002160142,0.0011404007,0.001335738,0.03776455,0.0019384241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042410027,0.00009761031,0.0002865854,0.004458639,0.0003031937,0.00026183916,0.0025034205,0.00015039658,0.006284207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66843003,0.00005082653,0.00025078494,0.041466117,0.00025980946,0.00030500512,0.00013573785,0.0004675145,0.000080692575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028474365,0.00073106773,0.0031604585,0.00019833629,0.000004372009,1.2014526e-7,0.00021023517,0.0000010222711,0.000003950546,0.00092032005,0.5331201,0.46164715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065257924,0.00014442512,0.038225815,0.0046638744,0.000053139738,0.0002116534,0.0016215189,0.00023981176,0.000043952492,0.050465632,0.90348357,0.00019402384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029971678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015601927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7774481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018712312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03310211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019123976","doi":"10.3138/w706-5884-kg84-j282","title":"The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4140064352683033,"score_gpt":0.5204434567997827,"score_spread":0.10643702153147938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019123976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469306,0.004039951,0.0012557391,0.008049048,0.001221162,0.000082277875,0.00000346729,0.0000072429393,0.038410548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950808,0.00022684586,0.003136171,0.00028342285,0.0003576166,2.5998966e-7,2.5201942e-7,0.000009636539,0.0009049374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750778,0.0004009043,0.0029878377,0.0003440744,0.020427793,0.000761552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333174,0.025870768,0.0045550643,0.0010192343,0.034431573,0.0008059467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2677449,0.00010881426,0.00032903056,0.028122317,0.0005495089,0.070878364,0.005824361,0.00017499967,0.000074374286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57502997,0.000057476533,0.0002800017,0.11822224,0.0001732415,0.04199186,0.0006084934,0.0020406027,0.0000060992684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008881354,0.000042439566,0.751161,0.0000023128691,0.000031841224,0.000055834393,0.00020640466,0.00000905634,0.008232927,0.0021824595,0.021650689,0.21633625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005766887,0.00018814279,0.8536939,0.000036886762,0.000007833602,0.00009493571,0.004056065,0.00007243729,0.002106682,0.008841942,0.13021736,0.00010713891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026025109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041819723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3072851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017884397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047816764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019360149","doi":"10.7202/055823ar","title":"Spécificités nationales de la science et de la technologie : une étude de deux universités montréalaises","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.45198800039292275,"score_gpt":0.5650182920949225,"score_spread":0.11303029170199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019360149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87244767,0.0367947,0.013276429,0.034320563,0.0001514001,0.00028845854,0.000059624268,0.00029293293,0.042368222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507047,0.065564394,0.08107542,0.00049637293,0.00012999788,0.000019371126,0.0000025664601,0.000029649718,0.0019774952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791486,0.004164905,0.0006167285,0.0011045034,0.0044671707,0.0017318365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620495,0.033768635,0.0002924263,0.0007520457,0.0023749536,0.0007624629],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0913047,0.00037284964,0.00042913514,0.04700716,0.00088476716,0.003114459,0.0043561985,0.0013961483,0.00014034216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05786365,0.00034667554,0.0004583694,0.17066915,0.0077500795,0.0016020854,0.0010833916,0.0018827566,0.00006794045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034469464,0.0009162559,0.670837,0.000035801437,0.00009778909,0.000093963274,0.0059952163,0.00057705934,0.011279546,0.08629881,0.009926787,0.2139073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005479022,0.00020195411,0.64758533,0.00013286127,0.000053246487,0.0001131501,0.0043580825,0.006618881,0.020293808,0.22672187,0.09275927,0.0006136306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014387703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023024115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21329366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007890274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005840105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020164772","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0047-7","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Chinese academy of sciences; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Public relations; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020164772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509983,0.0029052193,0.000052442043,0.0037106278,0.0012437458,0.0010476724,0.00016419026,0.000014192637,0.039863598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951642,0.000044835433,0.00023932436,0.00012848998,0.00015072334,0.00008031988,0.000028633081,0.000011178877,0.0041522626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640816,0.0020847549,0.0012719936,0.0021770175,0.028954996,0.0014296323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97729456,0.0141298175,0.00030019623,0.0012071647,0.0067909774,0.0002772922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27039412,0.00024684524,0.00035170827,0.16124608,0.002049613,0.0528011,0.011581393,0.00013899885,0.00009072709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050815355,0.00012271648,0.00007877634,0.5613865,0.002106619,0.0019925833,0.0038017046,0.0008250338,0.0001606389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004910176,0.00092479656,0.85550433,0.000027699401,0.000011020989,0.000040698662,0.0072135213,0.00016969391,0.00113616,0.03542786,0.06537916,0.034115948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090382586,0.00007145682,0.8559312,0.000027064274,0.0000018033272,0.000050993287,0.008599245,0.018287303,0.000056334957,0.03324895,0.08260381,0.00021798928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000543033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012826539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40014046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043094708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005685454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021082438","doi":"10.1002/asi.10278","title":"A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Los Angeles; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Monash University; Northwestern University; York University; Durham University; University of Colorado Boulder; University of St Andrews; McGill University; University of Reading; University of Oxford; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; University of Notre Dame; University of Southern California; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; University College London; Carnegie Mellon University; Ames Research Center; Macquarie University; Harvard University; Virginia Commonwealth University; Tulane University; University of Pennsylvania; Ohio State University; King's College London; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; University of California, San Diego; University of Toronto; Yale University; San Francisco State University; Princeton University","keywords":"Scholarship; Period (music); Element (criminal law); Sociology; Work (physics); Social science; Library science; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.17184264978978758,"score_gpt":0.499516243637624,"score_spread":0.3276735938478364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021082438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817423,0.0013794104,0.00020889081,0.016017064,0.00011773056,0.0002419095,0.000009916096,0.0000012789603,0.00028148977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581826,0.0022052366,0.0009967083,0.0009582002,0.000014154562,0.0000032119272,1.8086949e-7,0.0000016648443,0.0000023820703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958493,0.00031065516,0.0008768334,0.00013289951,0.0025801691,0.0002501254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311066,0.0012293204,0.0016147811,0.00027723884,0.0037034324,0.00006458391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041294444,0.00008598324,0.00027107086,0.009074395,0.00033675143,0.0012045469,0.0015687528,0.00010373041,0.0000010943166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021513801,0.000038505303,0.000084416184,0.087689355,0.002148432,0.0027271013,0.000118081356,0.0006692487,2.0734296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039789572,0.0003458412,0.574817,0.00008644412,0.000052531082,0.0000107919905,0.06278533,0.000026854545,0.008293176,0.13964465,0.0046198824,0.20891958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003695246,0.0038442947,0.44135883,0.00019320603,0.000046776408,0.004832407,0.23453511,0.0009089555,0.0014261227,0.2710971,0.03775538,0.00030655815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056706153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004040306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20861302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039192164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003841965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021241067","doi":"10.1111/jan.12573","title":"‘But how many papers <i>should</i> I write…?’: making good choices about quality, quantity and visibility of academic publications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Quality (philosophy); Visibility; Work (physics); Humanity; Sociology; The arts; Public relations; Computer science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.400975593232495,"score_gpt":0.6046051703475487,"score_spread":0.2036295771150537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021241067","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11541251,0.019869162,0.012972845,0.0045090313,0.8415534,0.0006776556,0.00046604013,0.0000452325,0.004494123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62370294,0.009119856,0.012599373,0.00011574406,0.3518964,0.000008123389,0.000024770094,0.00010061273,0.0024321694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772224,0.000919028,0.0030172092,0.0010582028,0.01697921,0.00080397783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94424635,0.027797706,0.008216108,0.0014475335,0.017509622,0.0007826636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04709689,0.00040948665,0.0016238637,0.031721912,0.00041904053,0.0023612755,0.0038108998,0.0010184277,0.00004767582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23666222,0.00030791375,0.00053980766,0.04239627,0.0007558724,0.0024215896,0.00047259495,0.0032673061,0.0000041003036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035252713,0.00045209576,0.019691845,0.00025950323,0.00010828959,0.0000054062593,0.00031930313,0.00013266911,0.009690942,0.0012436993,0.59012175,0.37762198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014843965,0.0006101817,0.071681224,0.0012404002,0.0001015886,0.000020983234,0.0014652462,0.00021228858,0.00063535053,0.008723273,0.91327333,0.0005517194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022447302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002029703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051194767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008615964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021483469","doi":"10.1007/s00168-011-0477-x","title":"Documenting regional science exceptionalism: what’s special about WRSA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Annals of Regional Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Friendship; Association (psychology); Collegiality; Narrative; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8516588281595016,"score_gpt":0.6086905303446607,"score_spread":0.24296829781484086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021483469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325637,0.001324685,0.00050384866,0.017034011,0.0017612572,0.00034818478,0.000010165514,0.000028859531,0.04642525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920309,0.0013179849,0.0011975437,0.0022498253,0.00075255026,0.000010451811,0.0000010002854,0.000008988384,0.0024307647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712895,0.00018667737,0.0009429003,0.0012712147,0.024950717,0.0013589942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850874,0.0018714836,0.00076726585,0.0014585733,0.010072857,0.00074241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06614322,0.00022196761,0.00033404634,0.022443501,0.0019842084,0.0035362835,0.012357648,0.000069847796,0.0016636723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013939798,0.00013045715,0.0002668401,0.16089661,0.01327699,0.0065834955,0.0020761252,0.0003201783,0.0004549068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002803286,0.0007231684,0.022965178,0.000011665309,0.000033175533,0.000027702898,0.008643667,0.00009783267,0.022692347,0.49383962,0.15404877,0.29663652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000370179,0.00028025507,0.5818984,0.000088836845,0.000007168367,0.00008609251,0.003149995,0.0011351724,0.015302316,0.2529394,0.14425722,0.00048497884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000217049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017251881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010759107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018523192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022393735","doi":"10.1007/s10916-005-9002-z","title":"Leading Knowledge Producers Within the Biomedical Informatics Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Health informatics; Informatics; Data science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Public health","score_opus":0.47572846670763463,"score_gpt":0.556831645855911,"score_spread":0.08110317914827642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022393735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603018,0.0030770167,0.014865045,0.0070222393,0.006291087,0.00024552864,0.0000067117016,0.000014521852,0.0081760045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773186,0.000040449057,0.00013421525,0.00007124317,0.0009883061,0.000002022867,0.0000010302791,0.0000064957912,0.00102436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702623,0.0017397517,0.0028529516,0.000116419156,0.024596227,0.00043235038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98263985,0.01102693,0.0016225333,0.00067645265,0.0032140783,0.0008201403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1814051,0.00012228847,0.00049208716,0.013438943,0.0004931229,0.0017781892,0.005385779,0.00022170412,0.000121594014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08751134,0.000052640487,0.00019186497,0.0529678,0.00056131865,0.00044704403,0.0006019184,0.0018492232,0.00021671916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766317,0.00094082084,0.027677525,0.00012996394,0.00008265726,0.000085686224,0.003819391,0.00029092102,0.00023768126,0.0061773965,0.90559113,0.05492918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025891776,0.0011225317,0.021032382,0.0006556016,0.000039642404,0.0019168473,0.032639988,0.093772896,0.0002639535,0.005293205,0.84028065,0.00039312456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003511331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028195944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09389377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018516016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009612004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024560113","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2013.847604","title":"It takes two to tango: knowledge mobilization and ignorance mobilization in science research and innovation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Mobilization; Relevance (law); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Conceptualization; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.6964362196885693,"score_gpt":0.6499707354633399,"score_spread":0.046465484225229337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024560113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98457193,0.00059041573,0.005192322,0.0017819684,0.0001352067,0.0012498705,0.0000039161964,0.000017469838,0.0064569227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947567,0.0001051319,0.0034072327,0.00008770805,0.000030475741,0.0001922826,0.0000016789968,0.000009839264,0.001408954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926991,0.00029852652,0.00064792426,0.0010155593,0.0046906425,0.00064829015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854049,0.0027550277,0.00012686217,0.0005763231,0.010817696,0.0003191961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042732168,0.00012171354,0.00021542487,0.103419125,0.00042636745,0.003251586,0.0011199727,0.00007270508,0.00014623192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064363666,0.00009193679,0.000011748146,0.42984346,0.0007048279,0.0017924485,0.00068935944,0.00024331706,0.00021448673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018246103,0.00028329508,0.2767667,0.000024499393,0.0000023855764,0.0000013308321,0.0031388744,0.000101930746,0.09884699,0.009734318,0.002144231,0.6089372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012925935,0.0009475714,0.75421524,0.00009539057,0.000002010151,0.000010456508,0.004669472,0.0773213,0.024892205,0.12313218,0.012913363,0.000508239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021618954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011018767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60842896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016652503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026139023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027653211","doi":"10.1087/0953151042321644","title":"The International Consortium for the Advancement of Academic Publication — an idea whose time has come (finally!)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Mainstream; Political science; Politics; Scholarly communication; Process (computing); Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Publishing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5407789765104187,"score_gpt":0.5441237570364209,"score_spread":0.003344780526002178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027653211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123129696,0.0020562182,0.11029045,0.7530151,0.0021759802,0.0014416279,0.00013841032,0.00008382192,0.007668687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870425,0.0004901824,0.0017386308,0.0014207086,0.00031666964,0.00010212154,0.00005746308,0.000018248635,0.008813502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991327,0.00017415648,0.00091418583,0.0005566113,0.0065116594,0.000516382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837877,0.008984134,0.0006930579,0.00092017994,0.005394214,0.0002207127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041046266,0.00011701044,0.00018026684,0.00721865,0.00091039995,0.018698012,0.006813042,0.000128944,0.00023765079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12531066,0.00006196978,0.00013068489,0.03221851,0.0003551558,0.005946047,0.000774518,0.0005374787,0.00008359756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001490862,0.00016099897,0.009250151,0.0000047145936,0.00006340116,8.8009665e-7,0.0005634868,0.0024298755,0.003589632,0.18975975,0.03811405,0.755914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009540868,0.00013684867,0.024240533,0.000010198378,0.00000804375,0.0000047254007,0.00097627356,0.01704432,0.0011299927,0.04370357,0.91165614,0.0001352919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015462427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004057567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8735421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020160226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046318382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027992795","doi":"10.2196/jmir.2177","title":"Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Informatics; Health informatics; Computer science; Index (typography); Multidisciplinary approach; Metric (unit); Scopus; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Business informatics; Percentile; Construct (python library); Data science; MEDLINE; Data mining; World Wide Web; Health care; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.7879302847482185,"score_gpt":0.7013157810152683,"score_spread":0.08661450373295021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027992795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586798,0.0013526296,0.010507405,0.023958402,0.00076154416,0.00042743442,0.0000050375575,0.0000033840568,0.004304381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962125,0.00080944283,0.0009901655,0.00019777569,0.00070627994,0.000021300426,0.0000034142463,0.000010432409,0.0010487112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8830528,0.002289763,0.0031708218,0.00025265242,0.10971434,0.0015195846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088385,0.053394105,0.0015455538,0.0011498311,0.03191969,0.0031523304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.527207,0.00012705268,0.0004427541,0.021510836,0.00023747103,0.0012872418,0.01039694,0.0003567854,0.0076558464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46939132,0.000062887615,0.00026790466,0.042971887,0.0011556272,0.0014061203,0.0022053774,0.0030162805,0.00007691819],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003981327,0.0004288631,0.09321584,0.000077335324,0.0000826405,0.0000038021271,0.0019765997,0.00001399661,0.00007448021,0.003980903,0.22864564,0.67110175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002969596,0.0033519138,0.028086614,0.00037072448,0.000013286329,0.00022468898,0.0079114735,0.8694956,0.0016615897,0.0021602346,0.08357101,0.00018331099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015340325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001538717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86948156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027275187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027993736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028083052","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1418218112","title":"Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":329,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Popularity; Elite; Institution; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Public relations; Work (physics); Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5052656839917774,"score_gpt":0.5108839846730919,"score_spread":0.005618300681314525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028083052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98219496,0.00015066146,0.00003333144,0.0009444344,0.00009954328,0.00021567315,0.0000067045535,0.0000046934965,0.01635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937403,0.000008203865,0.0004031073,0.000035952336,0.0000384217,0.0000057352177,2.3868665e-8,0.0000026705197,0.0001318655],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98323804,0.0001390702,0.00068869593,0.00048716803,0.015159363,0.0002876645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824786,0.010685812,0.0010608458,0.000048802176,0.0056386436,0.0000872904],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14237313,0.00008942144,0.00025246796,0.009814814,0.00066063966,0.0005395517,0.0056669023,0.000067492336,0.000017368311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08544587,0.00004172239,0.00016746164,0.08880645,0.003012211,0.00078690064,0.00087481516,0.00020899238,0.000005829211],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202541,0.00008027832,0.1255663,0.000089684894,0.000014769494,2.335095e-9,0.00014629107,0.000520684,0.67432594,0.18883412,0.0005516372,0.009838245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109038,0.000035846824,0.4228981,0.000069560985,0.000003323845,0.0000017824649,0.00010957652,0.004830348,0.39214712,0.1794072,0.0003401378,0.000047936588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011086136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.643535e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2973318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040983727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008696942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028653974","doi":"","title":"Problematising the Construction of Journal Quality: An Engagement with the Mainstream","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Journal ranking; Construct (python library); Citation; Privilege (computing); Proxy (statistics); Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Politics; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Law","score_opus":0.4298522153998736,"score_gpt":0.5091114348103812,"score_spread":0.07925921941050762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028653974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92968446,0.004277591,0.051917892,0.011119323,0.0002670035,0.00026130863,0.0000031909651,0.000008342556,0.002460917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929311,0.0052077766,0.0007888141,0.00006850059,0.00019176475,0.0000025298812,2.3548445e-7,0.000009475637,0.0007997864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988425,0.0015814273,0.0008347283,0.00025868855,0.0072217765,0.0016783434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943533,0.0017932338,0.0009689895,0.00052355527,0.0021782543,0.0001826697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093219094,0.00013336398,0.00023393396,0.007670221,0.0014575742,0.0025435586,0.0022343504,0.000049903432,0.00028258725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043756,0.000051083145,0.0001492835,0.038510893,0.0003836923,0.0008087344,0.00013949476,0.0026350939,0.000022205462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041753832,0.00016241655,0.013599013,0.0000031129618,0.00014411368,0.0000060848824,0.0011514628,0.00026031982,0.0002828152,0.09195274,0.0010556856,0.8913405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023192745,0.0032968286,0.019980175,0.000074909214,0.00007949121,0.010265453,0.08974575,0.0050705993,0.00046995466,0.85623217,0.012045758,0.00041960602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002834208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019729784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8909209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042555376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009376105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028838114","doi":"10.3138/jvme.38.1.33","title":"Open Access of Publications by Veterinary Faculty in the United States and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); MEDLINE; Free access; Veterinary medicine; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.835368762935936,"score_gpt":0.6633882952517739,"score_spread":0.17198046768416209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028838114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899171,0.00027027066,0.00012945128,0.008366375,0.00032228505,0.00012268384,0.000019755196,8.149915e-7,0.0008512851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982093,0.00054470217,0.0003000474,0.00075728865,0.000027996668,0.0000076874085,0.000017524642,0.0000030893298,0.00013237975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946053,0.00041358438,0.0007826814,0.00016257414,0.0038656606,0.00017020087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955954,0.0014751343,0.00055994187,0.0002823193,0.0017305856,0.00035662507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012461488,0.00006701524,0.0001899664,0.008095138,0.00007862393,0.0007294803,0.0049596056,0.00005123009,0.0006723247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020578517,0.000037297825,0.000028874692,0.026348135,0.00013593504,0.0011872257,0.0008116685,0.0002642981,0.0000010017222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002087455,0.0016957374,0.18742503,0.000024315688,0.000026127682,0.000049742423,0.0024643326,0.0000027627898,0.0002759764,0.00033920255,0.64402795,0.16346008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041384768,0.00096777594,0.7274947,0.00004166005,0.000004869173,0.00037933415,0.0045802593,0.0003795921,0.00004894136,0.0017951138,0.26381597,0.00007795622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21955687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006988073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54006964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008677086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031938306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99434733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030183246","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0006547","title":"The Impact of Boundary Spanning Scholarly Publications and Patents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Natural science; Data science; Scholarship; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7275158009252825,"score_gpt":0.5551312487887239,"score_spread":0.17238455213655857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030183246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903491,0.0016303931,0.00011875937,0.0023374127,0.00001708272,0.00013711654,0.000015324751,0.000011530191,0.0053832605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974655,0.00038229476,0.0006183488,0.000032098284,0.000022189985,0.0000030942779,0.0000013357688,0.0000028142874,0.0014723107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943439,0.00009682933,0.00035272716,0.00025995416,0.0046478827,0.00029874037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944149,0.001703198,0.00016412152,0.0005556967,0.0029263615,0.00023572057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009005678,0.00006284691,0.0001545861,0.013084588,0.00045274393,0.005761468,0.0011659253,0.0000434027,0.00009243838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036959223,0.000032817592,0.00006778052,0.07070998,0.00014042134,0.00121068,0.00020675811,0.0001960511,0.00005320069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017225819,0.0009280502,0.82145727,0.0000016610459,0.00006812417,8.978329e-7,0.000120003,0.0000026901728,0.017973691,0.0008880878,0.005058825,0.15348345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013750354,0.00023828243,0.9842772,0.0000077019195,0.000004564559,7.435552e-7,0.00005152997,0.0014798378,0.0009024855,0.012455834,0.00039838476,0.000045950106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049657818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016510154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16281989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004283388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015217754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030245717","doi":"10.1186/1465-9921-10-35","title":"Marketing data: Has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Respiratory Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Christie (Canada); McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Impact factor; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Presentation (obstetrics); Data science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Linguistics; History; Epistemology; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.7202358461148053,"score_gpt":0.64610634913581,"score_spread":0.07412949697899529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030245717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89240867,0.011816126,0.00006820084,0.002252684,0.08380776,0.003762211,0.0034108905,0.000017029088,0.0024564457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93171936,0.00012077445,0.000034045195,0.00004813991,0.066466294,0.00006919038,0.000025948846,0.00004156689,0.0014746775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90464866,0.02180281,0.0025756378,0.0026711132,0.0657973,0.0025044738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8426046,0.13567303,0.0007779535,0.008358441,0.012150053,0.00043595428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3537122,0.0003210514,0.00074354716,0.03777374,0.0011322506,0.006396754,0.023078866,0.0004461107,0.0002391869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41690463,0.00012873596,0.00031712922,0.20092814,0.0020263018,0.0005377511,0.0044622603,0.0034023263,0.00020698343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002883528,0.00019755747,0.004019422,0.000021795095,0.000030382858,0.000028851011,0.0025770813,0.000039993065,0.00157709,0.000008135193,0.9385988,0.05261252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051093387,0.00058663543,0.07214115,0.00009882132,0.000010004079,0.0000010735325,0.0060542678,0.0009391097,0.0006303722,0.00022470696,0.9185931,0.00020984108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019106963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16315441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038687314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004478891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032093065","doi":"10.1186/1471-5945-14-1","title":"Comparison of publication trends in dermatology among Japan, South Korea and Mainland China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SKiN Health","funders":"National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"China; Mainland China; Dermatology; Mainland; Geography; Medicine; Traditional medicine; Archaeology","score_opus":0.33046668067298457,"score_gpt":0.5180831048279414,"score_spread":0.18761642415495683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032093065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851873,0.00026990776,0.005216037,0.0010892694,0.00015550996,0.00010851194,0.000007103421,0.000016858365,0.007949532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989015,0.00000998797,0.00071012205,0.000054548826,0.000013625935,0.000012979128,0.0000145381155,0.000007969672,0.00027474348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954609,0.0007185399,0.001086425,0.00060012,0.0015917065,0.0005423056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554425,0.0024996647,0.00047272377,0.00062090275,0.00061789464,0.0002445731],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003958031,0.0001477968,0.0007058703,0.04349583,0.00009890645,0.0003182357,0.0010738876,0.00025160026,0.0001886311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01176441,0.00011204365,0.000075749675,0.04822773,0.0004852355,0.000326019,0.00042626535,0.00023851973,0.00006110316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015081202,0.00008024755,0.9694464,0.000010621377,0.000003828482,0.0000022631416,0.00043765188,0.000010306666,0.00004058815,0.0036157721,0.0038119454,0.022525268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007102301,0.000040818126,0.9537473,0.0000032197088,0.0000038612175,0.00010553929,0.00029237373,0.038979255,0.00052944326,0.0028321806,0.002643202,0.000112608446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011192532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003325834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03896895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022518778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056741494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032612522","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.100524","title":"Growing Trend of China’s Contribution to the Field of Rheumatology 2000–2009: A Survey of Chinese Rheumatology Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Rheumatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Rheumatology; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; China; Mainland China; Family medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.224564627582642,"score_gpt":0.5322449953018727,"score_spread":0.30768036771923074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032612522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871738,0.0014523285,0.0020346406,0.0072053294,0.0015792248,0.00028904463,0.00007011358,0.000004257167,0.00019127392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843806,0.00121207,0.00022180627,0.000041699725,0.0000059607573,0.0000036979284,0.0000023743178,0.0000138846735,0.000060434617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837066,0.005383648,0.0038633642,0.00042049805,0.0055949483,0.0010309737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226047,0.06399519,0.002696047,0.0014238075,0.008941679,0.00033860406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09924351,0.00023195994,0.0017360086,0.022528663,0.00031096864,0.000099710174,0.0056156986,0.00039592886,0.00051176484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24185228,0.00011237743,0.00031565648,0.05557978,0.0012912153,0.0003572047,0.0010649072,0.0016569566,0.00003293609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092813617,0.00023982392,0.9715519,0.000033465025,0.00012209095,0.0000035769751,0.0013612374,0.00009370128,0.0032677052,0.004577081,0.010561431,0.0072598387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001906434,0.001846325,0.97116446,0.00011379708,0.000023537057,0.003830014,0.0008341284,0.0013744895,0.0035360982,0.013431584,0.001735937,0.00020317057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011329856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004798644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14260878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042443557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008988733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033691041","doi":"","title":"The Skewed Few: Does 'Skew' Signal Quality Among Journals, Articles, and Academics?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Skepticism; Publication; Elite; Quality (philosophy); Skew; Political science; Psychology; Accounting; Business; Law; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Telecommunications; Epistemology","score_opus":0.392888126573138,"score_gpt":0.5416786107788136,"score_spread":0.14879048420567564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033691041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394741,0.0477574,0.007689654,0.0037629504,0.00053683994,0.00014222511,0.000005264644,0.000015446103,0.00061612186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577401,0.03838558,0.00008146306,0.00010157477,0.0006796901,0.000003887259,3.5556087e-7,0.000015278469,0.0029920419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447156,0.0012452676,0.0012304336,0.0004077112,0.0076163695,0.005028661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902192,0.0058903107,0.00075895264,0.00048415316,0.0016426293,0.0010047784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16559613,0.00021253582,0.00033400994,0.009152054,0.0018151795,0.004294122,0.0023025703,0.00019101286,0.00015433661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021721492,0.00009781071,0.00022644368,0.036881097,0.00043024408,0.001820572,0.00051635574,0.004218834,0.0000977182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005174861,0.00007548032,0.615371,0.0000012841772,0.0000735165,0.00000268381,0.0002432701,0.000002664205,0.00082824245,0.03890026,0.0012674893,0.34318238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005392814,0.00012964995,0.43612832,0.000010527669,0.000014145681,0.00036110386,0.0047542355,0.00030802668,0.0004295507,0.5472796,0.009827076,0.00021848081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009797964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031995506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50837934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006265564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010971192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034610514","doi":"10.1108/19355181201000007","title":"Twenty‐Five Years of the (Mid‐)American Journal of Business","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Business","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Quarter (Canadian coin); Intersection (aeronautics); Management; Library science; Political science; History; Economics; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1665839371864026,"score_gpt":0.46683930446660493,"score_spread":0.3002553672802023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034610514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912071,0.00018639915,0.0025962219,0.0026410837,0.00301345,0.0000827906,0.000016731126,0.000002610842,0.0002535782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964881,0.00026134867,0.0024499823,0.00015159693,0.000458552,5.0683803e-7,2.1933513e-7,0.000020135607,0.0001695825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879412,0.00040735846,0.001940709,0.00028224726,0.00892759,0.000500886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657153,0.0030124094,0.006204399,0.000830378,0.023839487,0.00039803056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145441685,0.0001971369,0.0010885543,0.022243928,0.00013409829,0.0006114248,0.005069804,0.0000598967,0.00018139911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036925808,0.000112774105,0.00043710848,0.19114923,0.002374159,0.0007992704,0.0005725366,0.0009180194,0.00001607062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024842823,0.0003563599,0.11699586,0.0000068951017,0.0000924232,0.000068880625,0.00045343718,0.0005485342,0.018180888,0.000061857594,0.0032267661,0.8597597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067928,0.0004921866,0.98120105,0.000056597335,0.000041982275,0.000640992,0.0020463835,0.00009321192,0.0016361455,0.00062836846,0.012317843,0.00016594588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040296192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026168547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007427912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014317539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035232183","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.013","title":"Bibliometrics of the Top 100 Clinical Articles in Digestive Disease","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gastroenterology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Disease; Medicine; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.49356636163877593,"score_gpt":0.5581707705082158,"score_spread":0.06460440886943991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035232183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933013,0.00016843082,0.0008424862,0.0044699316,0.0005970382,0.00032079432,0.000021143518,0.0000072531675,0.0002716504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877274,0.00006033575,0.0002939156,0.0005640009,0.00004301322,0.000018402443,8.0002076e-7,0.0000060283746,0.00024077429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936095,0.0008284843,0.0011239721,0.0005379065,0.0032476755,0.0006525028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923982,0.004256597,0.00035852674,0.0009928333,0.0015331488,0.00046066925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010152267,0.000114247225,0.00036069777,0.08418307,0.000065612236,0.00033463375,0.0023867353,0.00008553007,0.00080783345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04795712,0.00006344515,0.00022148101,0.24800184,0.0005796364,0.00036360786,0.0011731685,0.00033619578,0.00027887168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063434796,0.00027175117,0.9641751,0.0000013660369,0.0000064601486,0.0000036055144,0.000019447292,0.000035977828,0.00004272878,0.00008432921,0.005528303,0.029767519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005940281,0.00023052577,0.9920986,0.0000038042995,0.0000034051063,0.0000014011428,0.00006457865,0.0018557707,0.000025294696,0.0044847475,0.00059831544,0.000039489354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013972471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036052334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16381878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038325383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095420706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9600623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035300043","doi":"10.1332/174426410x483024","title":"Developing a guide to support the knowledge translation component of the grant application process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Plan (archaeology); Knowledge translation; Process management; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.6723618178160189,"score_gpt":0.6395747351570958,"score_spread":0.03278708265892305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035300043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9098525,0.0002675562,0.036853377,0.048014376,0.00043254462,0.0011919022,0.000011677664,0.0000211878,0.0033548647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978886,0.00003802653,0.0009439432,0.0004206164,0.0001672026,0.00006648824,5.6658166e-7,0.000006608806,0.000467925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944576,0.00016929161,0.0006781381,0.00041208215,0.0039199227,0.00036299112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920073,0.0037713586,0.00028824262,0.0011151461,0.002623498,0.00019446244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01452103,0.000106658044,0.00017213145,0.008612926,0.00034787843,0.00049521605,0.003599864,0.00006425586,0.00005616049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03246348,0.000050863528,0.00010788618,0.10337703,0.00020676831,0.00039479794,0.00035978868,0.00024603622,0.00023115508],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023236178,0.00009153487,0.049757957,0.000026579204,0.0000077798995,3.8544488e-7,0.005100752,0.000096923446,0.05788487,0.020198297,0.005748504,0.8610632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026196055,0.00011933389,0.67958385,0.000083027015,0.000010456279,0.000016159202,0.00063133956,0.0056208386,0.038827866,0.020979833,0.25359684,0.0002684847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057328667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049463764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007646626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011567279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035396258","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0085382","title":"With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: the Importance of Rejection, Power, and Editors in the Practice of Scientific Publishing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Proxy (statistics); Data science; Peer review; Scientific literature; Library science; Biology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2868372913769961,"score_gpt":0.4410933058599852,"score_spread":0.1542560144829891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035396258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98244506,0.00056612433,0.00001752045,0.01145226,0.0002658585,0.00057520176,0.000015291638,0.0000067155797,0.0046559484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833816,0.000046343932,0.0006779686,0.00015835595,0.000056332283,0.000020733294,0.0000011105909,0.0000063815755,0.0006945932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882239,0.00076089,0.0007122453,0.00059352076,0.009352199,0.00035725592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97313255,0.017747398,0.0006020753,0.0015187212,0.0068654716,0.00013378687],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04262316,0.00011171549,0.00030081766,0.012508284,0.00027507462,0.004061136,0.0017967876,0.000077603276,0.00030124024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13357005,0.00004922892,0.0000473023,0.09967157,0.00090190273,0.0031867956,0.00039671734,0.0003736585,0.0000140936445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012320548,0.0007341905,0.9661773,0.000013521891,0.000044959932,0.000004725676,0.0015884021,0.0000017681418,0.0015358832,0.0004990954,0.027830835,0.001446151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000598483,0.0006296227,0.9740237,0.00006898783,0.000030945324,0.000014793813,0.010225418,0.00035277466,0.002520567,0.004898081,0.0064833052,0.00015330916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040800904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013432934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09094688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004671245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002056342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035603363","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0073","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences: Developing a Scientific Power Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Index (typography); Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Science Citation Index; Impact factor; Social science; Citation; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4639904991995301,"score_gpt":0.5221175649609832,"score_spread":0.058127065761453045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035603363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90157634,0.00036841264,0.0021267436,0.08831879,0.001374493,0.00010902847,0.0000036247147,0.0000045531474,0.0061180396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741405,0.000018360643,0.0017254187,0.00025177904,0.00021940975,0.0000010151152,6.257294e-7,0.0000034623388,0.00036589862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98091257,0.00036787972,0.0015776794,0.00046674747,0.016202705,0.0004724494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700954,0.0019459747,0.0019124016,0.0003708713,0.025521854,0.00015351974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16317508,0.00009988774,0.00025342163,0.04497375,0.0009211279,0.16472296,0.007345763,0.00012384883,0.000045053534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25445592,0.000059992704,0.00014724827,0.13134773,0.00039078074,0.079577655,0.0005637381,0.001197356,0.0000059177924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007117504,0.00024680098,0.70282465,0.000002172524,0.000020391532,0.000007734437,0.00088043505,0.00008905418,0.005903311,0.036387283,0.04784063,0.20572639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004674308,0.000113978065,0.8971374,0.000029865592,0.0000020168097,0.000033580545,0.0011890867,0.0010369961,0.0006427379,0.055719476,0.043519035,0.00010839676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014044858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009099108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.205618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003995167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017136699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035928974","doi":"10.1108/00220411011023607","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Originality; Metadata; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.32507304535495857,"score_gpt":0.5600739134317266,"score_spread":0.23500086807676807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035928974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960828,0.00013156542,0.00037954078,0.002195826,0.00072514097,0.00018398049,0.000011240611,0.000001855872,0.00028806817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982828,0.000042772917,0.00010584289,0.000014395658,0.000037581456,0.000004031459,0.0000010346548,0.0000029625776,0.0015085719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471325,0.00015666486,0.00076892547,0.00027871295,0.0038663251,0.00021612493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935275,0.002968302,0.0007226714,0.00049133756,0.0021170913,0.00017312117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668051,0.00008504598,0.00017319832,0.019617788,0.00025327498,0.0037425554,0.0011901059,0.000051930627,0.0010015533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01385032,0.00003988714,0.00012984581,0.03372576,0.0003724681,0.0010731855,0.0001436857,0.0003720052,0.000020871372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070771406,0.00057401403,0.868578,0.000017320874,0.00002607319,0.0000021189512,0.001038099,0.00016865917,0.058979664,0.013990771,0.024471698,0.03208282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032256002,0.00023352115,0.9698034,0.000015790769,0.0000059883737,0.000009891068,0.0000995026,0.0014301995,0.0025894297,0.024909865,0.00052811066,0.00005177602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022184986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030384153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10122537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066936074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020065196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036137014","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0039464","title":"Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; James S. McDonnell Foundation; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Web of science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Natural science; Library science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7867820999348057,"score_gpt":0.5178547517630294,"score_spread":0.2689273481717763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036137014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98683536,0.0011839423,0.0094952965,0.0006662206,0.00009176471,0.00031806424,0.0000067217316,0.0000072136395,0.0013954195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938667,0.000062117164,0.005861507,0.00001193095,0.000020808568,0.0000075744424,2.0810988e-7,0.000002728129,0.0001664443],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923417,0.00018952589,0.00040344667,0.00022829993,0.0065462375,0.00029078795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946614,0.0021564497,0.00028556495,0.00057275494,0.0021549666,0.00016886268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033474047,0.000051087078,0.00017987116,0.013282751,0.00016949508,0.00026652997,0.0013406251,0.000031751842,0.000049810933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008314222,0.000027405938,0.000023169274,0.0656286,0.0008994767,0.00051360077,0.00032437817,0.00007281658,0.00008729536],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054049633,0.0016106839,0.20978962,0.00016037202,0.00005472455,3.7915595e-7,0.0011790144,0.000010195509,0.72131556,0.041936602,0.001867625,0.022021156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004336865,0.0002653662,0.42378017,0.00010267269,0.000057022713,0.000003610026,0.0035002392,0.068360746,0.50057,0.002224719,0.00051755615,0.00018420214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013966537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.4802327e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2207456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036656973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011280919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036361711","doi":"10.1021/ed400518m","title":"“Six Degrees of Separation”—Revealing a “Small-World Phenomenon” through a Chemistry Literature Search Activity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Polymer science; Epistemology; Materials science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3601155835965435,"score_gpt":0.5657124759820694,"score_spread":0.20559689238552592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036361711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98662716,0.00080854574,0.00529505,0.0013784353,0.00035168795,0.00008450889,0.0000053905574,0.0000041368285,0.0054450664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995245,0.000066409186,0.00811959,0.000058336787,0.0006359095,0.0000026513655,0.0000036198917,0.000008217066,0.0011528344],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446577,0.00018110088,0.0008836835,0.00029757968,0.0038821523,0.00028973416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907485,0.0022138169,0.00082241104,0.00040690677,0.0055118767,0.00029645165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008643459,0.00012910242,0.00038768898,0.0056516877,0.000070541326,0.00072406745,0.0012395984,0.00012657272,0.00026278882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01633283,0.00009106073,0.00021248958,0.039213646,0.0001136354,0.0007419143,0.00016159391,0.0005704837,0.000012597931],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019005059,0.0012093117,0.008368546,0.00010547005,0.000055587792,0.0000016773964,0.0015738041,0.00018852505,0.81327456,0.00090424385,0.012202896,0.16192533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010084483,0.0002289031,0.0147354305,0.0002621359,0.00003983355,0.00009500038,0.00058334746,0.006345257,0.93138134,0.014901604,0.030062748,0.00035594293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020062052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013492759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16156939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017661737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082775956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037081747","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0092896","title":"Imbalance in Individual Researcher's Peer Review Activities Quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Universität Zürich; Royal Society","keywords":"Peer review; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.8472890003982537,"score_gpt":0.56560010759442,"score_spread":0.2816888928038337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037081747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540949,0.015304288,0.0017473416,0.023081638,0.0003599643,0.0017849898,0.00039226125,0.00005097817,0.0031836797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91335046,0.03221067,0.018224696,0.0024768272,0.00051434455,0.00032274966,0.00004430162,0.00004060131,0.032815367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810022,0.00069985463,0.0008889951,0.0007956808,0.015603144,0.0010101034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833059,0.0069632656,0.00033147103,0.0006611684,0.008279083,0.00045912463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08989789,0.00015863379,0.0007385747,0.0066502183,0.00032606933,0.0031841714,0.0025257112,0.00023215922,0.0012454654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24701093,0.00012993132,0.0002288239,0.0676728,0.00024074079,0.00065829424,0.0006780891,0.000853388,0.00012290032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040885257,0.0027068125,0.114053786,0.0003448611,0.00012665938,0.000021731696,0.00012015633,0.0000037595137,0.0012210802,0.0001715084,0.76334465,0.11784411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013825201,0.00050501525,0.9495709,0.00088273163,0.000034451612,0.000013767904,0.00023996164,0.0075740935,0.00072882563,0.0071695503,0.0314934,0.00040478184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012532233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022926502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8355171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012711622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030291313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037110918","doi":"10.17323/1995-459x.2012.3.40.49","title":"Factors Influencing Research Performance in Higher Education: An Empirical Investigation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foresight-Russia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boulevard; Valuation (finance); Library science; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Accounting; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8388138199934497,"score_gpt":0.620716953153231,"score_spread":0.21809686684021867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037110918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98191667,0.00069090835,0.00002014632,0.0010006204,0.0009570907,0.00028393546,0.0000036691454,0.000029730922,0.015097213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330705,0.00002807426,0.0005064673,0.00019122714,0.00046544502,0.000040138686,0.000013740039,0.000018033685,0.005429822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884321,0.0008033954,0.0007650661,0.00066104287,0.00814374,0.0011946239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429303,0.0021603452,0.00015979823,0.0009153,0.0014450521,0.0010264926],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022697913,0.00019092472,0.0002773658,0.041789897,0.00047006598,0.0013861003,0.0018976184,0.00023153044,0.0018761904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005873695,0.00012219933,0.000073252755,0.1226583,0.00028319922,0.003588953,0.00044602802,0.0006927179,0.0006800212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010716085,0.00016503356,0.97939134,0.0000060433003,0.0000021986405,6.422897e-7,0.0012858006,0.000012529602,0.0002738536,0.0025685544,0.00833766,0.007945634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001469997,0.00012506025,0.94347477,0.000016172362,0.0000013674754,0.0000015188562,0.0005536113,0.0004856828,0.0012216781,0.0051085297,0.048698317,0.00016628261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016253622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037684218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0808684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043991237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079214346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037914303","doi":"10.1097/maj.0b013e3181f683a1","title":"Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of the Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.49236101212260036,"score_gpt":0.6198712869661325,"score_spread":0.1275102748435321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037914303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289964,0.000023784836,0.001538248,0.062509775,0.0020562927,0.000107267944,0.000005825794,0.0000024003377,0.0047600023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956924,0.000028027483,0.003153177,0.0006694162,0.00027178501,0.0000018668472,1.0323061e-7,0.0000027526983,0.00018051355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98091936,0.0010720533,0.00086126645,0.00027653392,0.016558142,0.00031263643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908522,0.004675148,0.0017588051,0.00060371077,0.0015535023,0.0005566842],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08211728,0.0000895348,0.0003243576,0.003625518,0.00047087006,0.0014582901,0.02147825,0.000036856076,0.0011879867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027548501,0.000033757336,0.00014082783,0.045127157,0.0046584317,0.00074968475,0.0014111559,0.000837775,0.000008572916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015727777,0.0008428152,0.13881458,0.0000017746329,0.000065143664,0.0000364224,0.00067249936,0.00012592315,0.028295787,0.04383294,0.008185209,0.77896965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006032978,0.0027248692,0.79983985,0.000042799606,0.00001903139,0.0005253252,0.0028899706,0.008992823,0.0030270119,0.17030683,0.010831634,0.00019655086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018174112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004932662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77877307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004411267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014406632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038196424","doi":"10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3","title":"Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bookmarking; Social media; Citation; Tracking (education); Scopus; World Wide Web; Download; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5482835610101827,"score_gpt":0.547941311386074,"score_spread":0.0003422496241086703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038196424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725812,0.0019702993,0.013103785,0.00034024505,0.0004496927,0.00035365165,0.000032408647,0.000019516745,0.011149187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976739,0.0009003761,0.00083874917,0.00027388628,0.00004887113,0.000009419979,0.000006606601,0.000011991764,0.00023618668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744112,0.0026961304,0.0014232779,0.00076830934,0.019740634,0.00096047786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9366072,0.054657523,0.00093499303,0.002370915,0.0048499224,0.0005794386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17132866,0.00023811031,0.00055871904,0.78389746,0.0006015102,0.0029663448,0.0052209995,0.0001921364,0.000063904175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24673264,0.00014596799,0.0001639573,0.95854455,0.00067227427,0.0009260565,0.001274417,0.0009095567,0.00008467943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122395495,0.00041877685,0.6253552,0.000022350547,0.0000053483654,0.0000020033563,0.00071411935,0.00020221413,0.00011460862,0.003432768,0.0015933355,0.36812705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007053017,0.000458395,0.9631696,0.0000090040185,0.0000074582513,0.000011186824,0.001316197,0.0063808975,0.00017975848,0.008942391,0.018627973,0.00019187413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040684664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046126213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36793518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011344444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001189067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038336957","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.070506","title":"Peer review or barbecue? The choice is clear","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Commercialization; Rule of thumb; Computer science; Data science; Operations research; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.3064915061976739,"score_gpt":0.5548140024342418,"score_spread":0.24832249623656794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038336957","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027705395,0.013509771,0.000047050566,0.25631064,0.7140661,0.00027515166,0.00045312295,0.000010488066,0.015299947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000024248318,0.04468722,0.000037873633,0.03258853,0.7816198,0.000006882286,0.000039196482,0.000035351055,0.14096093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8632564,0.0011705429,0.0019468047,0.0006683536,0.13141643,0.0015414719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75841427,0.09777078,0.00328326,0.0017200626,0.1262531,0.012558555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26338163,0.00031753792,0.000819528,0.024197107,0.0011438536,0.0057149,0.0072391317,0.0023834489,0.052748285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.881328,0.00016225174,0.0005465944,0.09972997,0.00015445554,0.00040632783,0.00029957434,0.008927211,0.004210161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047132635,0.000012110906,0.00045582344,0.000016692009,0.000056440167,0.00029519488,0.000057492758,7.527239e-8,1.5745599e-8,0.0000053070376,0.89842516,0.10067096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003219021,0.000073851865,0.0012210419,0.0004279681,0.0000316763,0.000057347723,0.00012615594,0.00003552304,2.5832347e-7,0.00017481881,0.9973074,0.00022201928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006771141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04053688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6179464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033068266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028536974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038587805","doi":"10.1007/s10508-009-9582-7","title":"Cruising: Impact Factor Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.7010522361312548,"score_gpt":0.639044386930346,"score_spread":0.06200784920090874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038587805","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07627611,0.0037522127,0.0010111656,0.00011095865,0.87721163,0.0012594309,0.035301253,0.00009672719,0.0049805245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121240415,0.0012310469,0.005216578,0.00002783829,0.8414807,0.000037191083,0.00595788,0.00018943357,0.024618967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755399,0.00038925596,0.0016114999,0.0021430755,0.019284323,0.0010319124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967197,0.023915982,0.0010913267,0.005263722,0.0017080175,0.0008239735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006672464,0.0005249892,0.0012077196,0.053123023,0.00020397187,0.0021029208,0.016031545,0.00061881024,0.000857749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058107615,0.0003560345,0.0002705264,0.04597562,0.00055093504,0.00083945575,0.004300521,0.0014826496,0.00021950065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041725336,0.00031109364,0.0042767017,0.000008472809,0.000020783935,0.000028554634,0.00007704818,7.331051e-7,0.00090095156,0.0000044757526,0.586263,0.40806648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069497776,0.0018588059,0.1381751,0.000039483173,0.0001116043,0.000004286127,0.00013527421,0.00029624585,0.00021654833,0.00074479694,0.85705227,0.000670635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005371962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036543566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40739584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007875328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015522881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039947719","doi":"10.4000/rga.464","title":"Knowledge Transfer Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de géographie alpine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.41680975064642484,"score_gpt":0.49417981873544203,"score_spread":0.0773700680890172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039947719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96942514,0.004269161,0.0030273434,0.0014951886,0.00039355128,0.00019906323,0.000018706163,0.00007272126,0.021099119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98910314,0.003745185,0.0007520438,0.00020537917,0.00027839447,0.000016656868,0.000006209079,0.00001808325,0.005874881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950507,0.00017919844,0.0006112924,0.000694429,0.0027317484,0.0007326052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995735,0.0012756856,0.00006686019,0.0008766349,0.001478493,0.00056735385],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006605468,0.00017801588,0.00036365952,0.050928112,0.00037171613,0.0004748242,0.0022440988,0.00014668122,0.0005219962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016037428,0.00013514695,0.00034183782,0.22667716,0.00047370847,0.00043414254,0.00023164398,0.00027328057,0.0008543844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067415145,0.000887195,0.6683111,0.000098036464,0.0000931088,0.00035677088,0.0017916589,0.000052057792,0.0073844707,0.011366678,0.031795382,0.27779615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006801654,0.00016564228,0.6063445,0.000025595227,0.000011039828,0.00022126356,0.00011968531,0.001758085,0.0010560221,0.0057389904,0.38356075,0.00031824567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000813044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013960163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3517654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037795446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100850295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040153632","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2012.09.006","title":"The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: A province-wide study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Context (archaeology); Rank (graph theory); Index (typography); Medicine; Normative; Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Web of science; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Mathematics; Library science; Computer science; Database; Geography; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6384092262250437,"score_gpt":0.5810208108211644,"score_spread":0.05738841540387929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040153632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924475,0.00043161295,0.000028633978,0.0017359909,0.0005155527,0.001518923,0.000005721281,0.000010165326,0.0033058873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753094,0.0006648272,0.000034074586,0.00010875936,0.000080120735,0.00033681584,0.0000012991221,0.000019211995,0.0012239368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97287554,0.0028553659,0.0020916113,0.0008616257,0.019679477,0.0016363556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88500524,0.10879452,0.0004892055,0.0020085645,0.0034566226,0.0002458691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2313253,0.00021949633,0.000662401,0.26378208,0.00049071765,0.0030952047,0.0035104733,0.00013046851,0.00026677724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059656825,0.00009993801,0.0002317499,0.58700216,0.000489686,0.001114018,0.0008536976,0.0010310648,0.00014446561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634002,0.0006018462,0.9054001,0.000009872493,0.00000834118,0.000018711376,0.00015543868,0.0000625283,0.0000072088956,0.000071143775,0.020059824,0.07358867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019812759,0.00011376012,0.97870827,0.000019037678,0.0000010235816,0.0000024797032,0.0027472822,0.009920874,0.000030989653,0.0008397925,0.007279565,0.0001387789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002784997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010052299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32322007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026541075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014545689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040262509","doi":"10.1177/0002764214556803","title":"Changing Ties in a Far-Flung, Multidisciplinary Research Network","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Friendship; Interpersonal ties; Multidisciplinary approach; Strong ties; Public relations; Work (physics); Discipline; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5841317415057182,"score_gpt":0.6304464635516845,"score_spread":0.04631472204596632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040262509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887296,0.00019351965,0.0017600517,0.00058186735,0.0011440445,0.00035941572,0.000013068927,0.00004680069,0.0071716355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989693,0.000032777472,0.0023890287,0.00007128394,0.00020330717,0.000051910574,0.000007055621,0.000021541291,0.007530111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98260474,0.0012208452,0.0008140493,0.001413395,0.011292377,0.0026545632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339116,0.0026321316,0.00027366096,0.0012532768,0.0017428495,0.00070695026],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06661289,0.00022019047,0.0005138584,0.05231087,0.001274684,0.002921515,0.0035410563,0.00008519041,0.00033639927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006431007,0.00016962388,0.00016500535,0.3197235,0.0022599385,0.00066644035,0.0030716495,0.00070519524,0.0008664404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020480862,0.0002665135,0.63608086,0.0000016874566,0.0000016999676,0.000036358546,0.0005411279,0.00015164778,0.00038960206,0.0011645266,0.011535883,0.34980965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000495692,0.0007604811,0.92716426,0.000027782751,0.0000047266612,0.000012229433,0.005211018,0.01080939,0.000112565904,0.0049458877,0.050018825,0.00043711904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002594855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015234946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031802236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017570994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040368148","doi":"10.1002/jmv.20346","title":"Estimates of global research productivity in virology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Virology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Population; Per capita; Demography; Ranking (information retrieval); Geography; Citation; Bibliometrics; Socioeconomics; Library science; Medicine; Environmental health; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.7020022047232732,"score_gpt":0.6948214986987673,"score_spread":0.007180706024505934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040368148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375104,0.0017868784,0.0015375543,0.057566017,0.00047148942,0.00008266911,0.0000037428335,0.0000023042287,0.0010389928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761665,0.000343582,0.0014085744,0.0002053192,0.0003777376,0.0000015348115,1.5025567e-7,0.0000039363917,0.00004248712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98140544,0.0015214747,0.00163202,0.00039828353,0.01430745,0.00073535915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840244,0.0112346895,0.00057756266,0.00046576996,0.003034886,0.00066268974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.122254625,0.000099260295,0.00067051145,0.021710705,0.00006453847,0.00010756772,0.0034862142,0.00040075363,0.0015345123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23593155,0.000061890874,0.00014014087,0.06381915,0.001234898,0.0003540768,0.0008666695,0.0013623359,0.00010656478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033523308,0.0009866097,0.5710506,0.000006166623,0.000022777565,0.00026175086,0.000088705594,0.00013020437,0.0018888307,0.0041728267,0.013842879,0.40721345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014927784,0.001521326,0.8952316,0.000015539998,0.000004624132,0.00052295043,0.00011730097,0.0049883975,0.0007350262,0.06712842,0.028161399,0.000080655715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090725385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028143812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40713277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019552269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040419988","doi":"10.1037/a0021086","title":"The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5062710187992778,"score_gpt":0.6221058731479057,"score_spread":0.11583485434862784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040419988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95786554,0.00021101639,0.00056323747,0.02552985,0.003307728,0.00024366383,0.00001946299,0.0000278231,0.012231677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274075,0.00008655288,0.0012134257,0.00021596636,0.00017442739,0.00001689022,0.0000011047093,0.000010585372,0.0055402736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912929,0.0002987689,0.00073707616,0.001140667,0.0057925438,0.00073806895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901424,0.004531468,0.00074599945,0.0021850734,0.0020961228,0.00029892236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034616806,0.00015185117,0.0003210094,0.011552028,0.0008898319,0.0018955603,0.004752091,0.00013691488,0.00013917053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06961308,0.00008333932,0.0001598481,0.15368076,0.008127958,0.0005086986,0.00056199037,0.0014188713,0.00020414212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034446486,0.00015238859,0.07941999,0.0000012803472,0.000010985078,0.000003024571,0.00014758491,0.0000030382453,0.06907481,0.002110257,0.14557901,0.7034632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021588974,0.00024380593,0.27644056,0.0000037490302,0.000004949788,0.000022293347,0.0014292285,0.00012704567,0.0068927077,0.008855591,0.705544,0.00022019791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016065563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008833964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70324296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028426019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018022965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040658269","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.1002010","title":"Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Tel Aviv University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Austrian Science Fund; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; King's College London; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Wellcome Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Robustness (evolution); Biology; Transformative learning; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","score_opus":0.5648574577525743,"score_gpt":0.5704503019238251,"score_spread":0.0055928441712507215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040658269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7876248,0.046544798,0.11499876,0.025468318,0.0005726956,0.0017234077,0.00013927786,0.00004895731,0.022878982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574244,0.003482222,0.0001565533,0.00046584316,0.00003476428,0.000028236236,0.0000037227471,0.0000025478241,0.00008369898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774486,0.00042132425,0.0004984766,0.00033136175,0.00079435116,0.0002096119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445957,0.003553895,0.00019460089,0.0007408396,0.0009680815,0.00008301309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122062825,0.000060057748,0.00023004886,0.0048442115,0.000100228615,0.00004840743,0.001269249,0.000056689372,0.00018038537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015773945,0.000027572352,0.00008113979,0.0416396,0.00020830511,0.00004999767,0.000111754736,0.00010432306,0.00017090792],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072513785,0.0001492428,0.018181438,0.00005275424,0.000014094362,0.0000062462523,0.000064355234,0.0000019502836,0.009979032,0.017197108,0.010822518,0.943524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072477985,0.00097304943,0.019279199,0.000083160325,0.00006558127,0.00029740095,0.00016432567,0.026043111,0.010613165,0.14263664,0.7987405,0.00037908248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013444995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033872577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008579547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002340373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99251664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041166561","doi":"10.12735/ier.v2i2p44","title":"Changing Institutional Research Productivity of United States’ Science Education Programs: 2000s v. 1990s","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Political science; Science education; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6934014789930255,"score_gpt":0.680352145609588,"score_spread":0.0130493333834375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041166561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342069,0.0002200373,0.0016112988,0.008641919,0.003377771,0.0008626213,0.000020173557,0.00002944531,0.051029857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978488,0.00008878714,0.001507476,0.000092113856,0.00072939636,0.00019917339,0.00013965218,0.00001472199,0.018740628],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96579695,0.0014148518,0.0008984709,0.0012985533,0.029372577,0.0012186287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9124107,0.003653853,0.00028827085,0.0012807997,0.08172562,0.0006407825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1347894,0.0001560251,0.00022922401,0.15612513,0.0014179484,0.0028164645,0.0054356176,0.00011113838,0.00061658863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1514913,0.00012902041,0.00009125644,0.24444883,0.0031689657,0.001673129,0.0015770312,0.000984341,0.00056577125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006434384,0.0028779984,0.04681302,0.000027632104,0.000016940643,6.09472e-7,0.0013232807,0.00024500943,0.0024238985,0.15332536,0.019781183,0.77310073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038247067,0.00038265524,0.057841644,0.00015430135,0.000002710176,0.00002271999,0.010923504,0.028234238,0.0080820555,0.10104536,0.7926303,0.0002980111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015428289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004764886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77284914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012338115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014934483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041552725","doi":"10.2466/pr0.106.3.891-900","title":"Predicting Long-Term Citation Impact of Articles in Social and Personality Psychology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Variance (accounting); Impact factor; Psychology; Personality; Sample (material); Social psychology; Library science; Political science; Accounting; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6770501935078974,"score_gpt":0.6678924215649938,"score_spread":0.00915777194290357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041552725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949904,0.000068398454,0.00024284702,0.0003750894,0.00030561778,0.00014293674,0.0000050645867,0.000012715065,0.003856952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952424,0.000017285798,0.00028592552,0.00004904776,0.00007294772,0.0000065107856,0.0000015822172,0.0000037425164,0.000038726008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956189,0.00019423598,0.00085917057,0.0006843508,0.0022779254,0.0003654417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969754,0.0013551319,0.00041794675,0.0003732632,0.00067388336,0.00020435549],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015434073,0.00009901307,0.00027768937,0.00782798,0.000098433404,0.00026154603,0.00036361808,0.00020212914,0.0008872549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02916351,0.00006194475,0.00013516993,0.028859241,0.00035876868,0.00021824361,0.00014759447,0.00040963283,0.000007761621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034084802,0.00024528906,0.9077713,0.0000014373137,0.0000042998054,0.00009724526,0.00013954408,5.489461e-7,0.0123663135,0.00005855727,0.00027588545,0.07900553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023105141,0.0002024047,0.9800879,0.000001878026,0.0000016824412,0.00015197227,0.000026452546,0.00009358757,0.00006794994,0.019054968,0.000014373805,0.00006578576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009148393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058745205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07893975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021131164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002988167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99178284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041712247","doi":"10.1126/science.330.6005.756-a","title":"Funding for Chinese Collaboration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.581687363507967,"score_gpt":0.633972770791863,"score_spread":0.05228540728389597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041712247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029031433,0.00034172626,0.008160044,0.93545175,0.014770795,0.0013416499,0.00029440646,0.00007401167,0.010534163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.099666,0.00009912728,0.022559306,0.77375156,0.014890652,0.000306592,0.00012672239,0.00010364865,0.08849638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977084,0.00008475404,0.000698575,0.0017005308,0.019157426,0.0012747102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97956854,0.0067104185,0.0005307108,0.0016215257,0.011200168,0.000368618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045100857,0.00025536827,0.00041144216,0.09202982,0.0011811564,0.013422454,0.0087891705,0.0009024129,0.0003241971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15722878,0.0001619265,0.00018053233,0.36632603,0.0011937491,0.0016424186,0.00094261835,0.0022433344,0.0005225139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030304006,0.000010856198,0.0014438877,0.000007151449,0.0000017993827,0.000009392317,0.00004927211,0.000002167125,0.0059359223,0.000098354925,0.9723908,0.020047393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013593685,0.000074573094,0.0041448586,0.0000047981503,0.0000027306808,0.000005191429,0.000035385845,0.002631315,0.00039273262,0.016331282,0.9760034,0.00023781354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012795609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024258494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2742962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023474387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021615727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041807538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.76","title":"Exploring How Library Publishing Services Facilitate Scholarly Communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Digitization; Certification; Promotion (chess); Function (biology); Electronic publishing; Popularity; Public relations; Library science; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Management; Economics; Telecommunications; The Internet","score_opus":0.8332413547542352,"score_gpt":0.4585807703599362,"score_spread":0.374660584394299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041807538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9196535,0.0065144957,0.0016938978,0.030171245,0.0016482468,0.00019040123,0.00004043702,0.0000806625,0.040007144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97236353,0.0016922802,0.023080993,0.0008786,0.00039950755,0.000007519837,0.000008396538,0.00004008162,0.0015290905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773672,0.0014770449,0.0020719927,0.0007010691,0.017441455,0.00094119145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658629,0.004557964,0.002786401,0.0019170523,0.023316922,0.0015587963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09545518,0.00029904212,0.00064070255,0.065138854,0.00087995344,0.65290785,0.018064095,0.00036381843,0.000521694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16633968,0.000218845,0.0004391616,0.099750094,0.00015512231,0.84893614,0.0035872883,0.0056363414,0.00008528974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001631773,0.000321595,0.5909682,0.00004165701,0.0001454709,0.00013703849,0.010723228,0.000015053662,0.001524055,0.005713944,0.049638446,0.34060812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017627404,0.0004675554,0.61180246,0.0003356434,0.000037409893,0.00020671648,0.033359632,0.00044875103,0.0019857965,0.056865834,0.2921011,0.00062638253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028847126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017557226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33998173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022550712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006016698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99665767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042381952","doi":"10.1096/fj.05-4711lsf","title":"Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Quarter (Canadian coin); Geography; Population; Per capita; Latin Americans; World population; Rest (music); Impact factor; Citation; Demography; Ranking (information retrieval); Product (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Medicine; Sociology; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.542214445398465,"score_gpt":0.5731093768053197,"score_spread":0.03089493140685473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042381952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656337,0.003818359,0.0037054077,0.022970017,0.0004821798,0.00028671374,0.000025778556,0.0000045388465,0.0030733256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724996,0.0005764655,0.00005241229,0.00009452338,0.00051671424,0.0000058917635,0.0000025582665,0.0000062076406,0.001495242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757156,0.0034167194,0.0014159752,0.0003194295,0.018120833,0.0010114487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791475,0.015485441,0.00050885347,0.00081273314,0.0037248486,0.00032061254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10881213,0.00013270706,0.00034420565,0.05027193,0.00093787484,0.0025574232,0.0043153777,0.00009826588,0.0010695996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019429624,0.00005260401,0.000255616,0.15212698,0.0007871724,0.00034716522,0.00042532416,0.0019354725,0.00011347596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034207132,0.0024418137,0.37239853,0.0000074049585,0.00006342394,0.00035463102,0.0009286287,0.00018348561,0.05223249,0.045384273,0.47217214,0.05349111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013909676,0.0002780328,0.77121264,0.00010471706,0.000011284061,0.00030035293,0.0017283512,0.0009163388,0.004002573,0.19390184,0.0260093,0.0001436292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016543771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020500006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44616282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021143843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027792362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042588761","doi":"10.1213/ane.0b013e31818f0e89","title":"Subspecialty Impact Factors: The Contribution of Pediatric Anesthesia and Pain Articles","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Subspecialty; Anesthesia; MEDLINE; Regional anesthesia; Intensive care medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.2796530443318512,"score_gpt":0.455819171698837,"score_spread":0.17616612736698584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042588761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99429756,0.002297179,0.00066324853,0.0023468172,0.000018942605,0.00028155808,0.000002508196,0.000026457534,0.00006573763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851966,0.00092987914,0.000071359274,0.00017599446,0.00015414887,0.0000064648825,0.000005088589,0.000013848125,0.0001235515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922078,0.0010126233,0.0008384797,0.00058043754,0.004693524,0.0006670972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99008214,0.006426472,0.0004667148,0.0008044108,0.0018143598,0.00040592335],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017857876,0.00024618386,0.0005093002,0.010141647,0.0005596532,0.0005141571,0.0013409972,0.00015188684,0.00025053605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009451439,0.00013020665,0.00028626033,0.057770334,0.00049050315,0.0004888252,0.00009538817,0.00023391987,0.000060215025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038479873,0.00010256029,0.9863672,0.0000021650924,0.000015834376,0.00014296907,0.00029998415,0.0000120726345,0.00014769714,0.0008420398,0.007435299,0.0045936704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028380792,0.00029769237,0.99226993,0.000002553628,0.00001959781,0.0003081201,0.0002917131,0.0010813832,0.00065204804,0.002115779,0.0025089572,0.00016843555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039685125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021872576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047628686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006939306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025596833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042603474","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.l.00519","title":"Authorship Proliferation in the Orthopaedic Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Internationalization; Medicine; Currency; Impact factor; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4583888714888302,"score_gpt":0.47863406870016134,"score_spread":0.020245197211331167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042603474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828243,0.0038569907,0.00020260805,0.012283859,0.0003416671,0.00010219961,0.0000011458902,0.0000016222218,0.00038555343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980001,0.00080232485,0.00014445752,0.0005017189,0.00020433217,0.0000030801896,5.1612216e-7,0.0000029507946,0.00034055283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938782,0.00053505186,0.0012551165,0.00015118187,0.003937486,0.00024295236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917373,0.0051823445,0.0006478631,0.00021888998,0.0020058062,0.00020777705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061885715,0.000073710544,0.00037500478,0.034162607,0.00009523138,0.0025841747,0.00015478465,0.00008095992,0.00015208764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037739687,0.00003354118,0.00023580229,0.044896077,0.000052297346,0.0010618911,0.00006536717,0.00046550608,0.000031527885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029212717,0.00014273722,0.6612792,0.000016107619,0.000008085591,0.00029321012,0.0011789266,0.0000054710513,0.0006498805,0.00029398515,0.18294787,0.15315533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001442223,0.00007128272,0.97492135,0.00006318767,0.0000022841166,0.0004439637,0.00037025218,0.00036938122,0.000062058454,0.016741004,0.006749833,0.00006119056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011287203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037275026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31364217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017900053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013606956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042604928","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0012203","title":"The United States of America and Scientific Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; U.S. Navy; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Advanced Research Projects Agency; National Science Foundation; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Natural Environment Research Council; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Per capita; China; Political science; Government (linguistics); European union; Population; Globalization; Economic growth; Regional science; Economics; Economic policy; Geography; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.7880966157939311,"score_gpt":0.5868889078938813,"score_spread":0.20120770790004983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042604928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949005,0.00041501474,0.000039751485,0.002872133,0.000119647964,0.0001765725,0.000021145155,0.000008395937,0.0014467979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914872,0.00054018764,0.0013274348,0.000022754088,0.000031878804,0.0000089452315,0.0000043695627,0.000005847405,0.0065713557],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635054,0.0003160704,0.00038456175,0.00044195913,0.011986076,0.0005207778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735664,0.016405998,0.00012744775,0.0010373617,0.008552556,0.00031022262],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032027394,0.000059973925,0.00016266256,0.03723875,0.0009410729,0.0033457621,0.0019637614,0.000049543203,0.00023641347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07466052,0.000032113818,0.000030588348,0.21518643,0.0024153988,0.00018549558,0.0008724162,0.0005228731,0.0001834939],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097688906,0.0025869065,0.18085171,0.000032582087,0.00011332903,0.0000079511365,0.0013703897,0.0000071099444,0.51981014,0.00895544,0.057539742,0.22862704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079898984,0.00087784743,0.17714362,0.000043525666,0.000020224714,0.0000029258874,0.004765922,0.084993415,0.121335514,0.09984458,0.5098069,0.00036653533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022726094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050042527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45226717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012521139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012669692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043014255","doi":"10.1002/asi.21495","title":"Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Citation analysis; Ranking (information retrieval); Information retrieval; Data science; Citation impact; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Mathematics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.48093983934431594,"score_gpt":0.545034406982603,"score_spread":0.06409456763828703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043014255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990956,0.00011123734,0.00207252,0.0060632713,0.000097915094,0.00034919768,0.000006435703,0.0000041576104,0.00033923733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619716,0.00017680415,0.0029773517,0.000606041,0.000008684813,0.000014697432,2.2452706e-7,0.0000015366547,0.00001749599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937523,0.00017297058,0.00096686755,0.00018014484,0.0045137512,0.00041396866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98486346,0.0046066893,0.0013926582,0.00034325017,0.008721338,0.000072588606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035299893,0.00008092612,0.00033852187,0.026743438,0.0005008377,0.00077305426,0.0026338936,0.00007489165,0.0000038270036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072088595,0.00003891741,0.0001334359,0.30222258,0.0015412916,0.001826388,0.00037373597,0.0005843504,0.0000029096664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040448955,0.00034393228,0.6712967,0.00003266379,0.0001420638,0.000004400979,0.09920222,0.00081504654,0.0008561278,0.0061305226,0.03654885,0.18422295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010623516,0.0018332056,0.2564001,0.000027398206,0.000043767992,0.000017765602,0.6455271,0.043093234,0.0021843594,0.005037319,0.04459213,0.00018125465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001097242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015016882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5463249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018108009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005669013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043428965","doi":"10.5703/1288284315239","title":"The British National Approach to Scholarly Communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"License; Publication; Scholarly communication; Excellence; Finch; Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Toolbox; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6395039357106561,"score_gpt":0.5713218405943833,"score_spread":0.06818209511627282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043428965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029780524,0.00029928063,0.08090962,0.0057475334,0.00013900759,0.00019747403,0.0000044252315,0.000026769456,0.88289535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582853,0.00006311415,0.010780964,0.0010132464,0.00004901373,0.000020679478,0.0000025950185,0.000004174664,0.029780962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937804,0.00034838566,0.00033815674,0.00032432622,0.009338117,0.00027297155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875872,0.0058673425,0.000067182504,0.0007318838,0.005504151,0.00024221578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051945113,0.000047609174,0.000083893996,0.007669732,0.0016656086,0.045506217,0.003928092,0.000044422814,0.00009743876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10839192,0.000029286603,0.000053654257,0.09715467,0.00009752391,0.00096447393,0.0007939266,0.00018921822,0.0010370546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029966204,0.000069193804,0.007231324,3.204733e-7,0.0000034607274,5.6131885e-8,0.00002607139,0.00006066566,0.00004955047,0.09735596,0.39870185,0.49649855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012693925,0.000028417906,0.13664259,0.0000012929023,4.21077e-7,0.000004754019,0.00015819033,0.018458351,0.00003461421,0.05819098,0.78627986,0.00007359326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027625353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001256126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005775648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008435394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043976883","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504701284","title":"Mapping the highly collaborative stem cell research field: Adding last‐author‐based analysis to the author co‐citation analysis family","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Compromise; Field (mathematics); Citation; Computer science; Operations research; Library science; Data science; Information retrieval; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.24700646458077738,"score_gpt":0.4998953364659076,"score_spread":0.2528888718851302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043976883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604208,0.000025573489,0.00689701,0.030409923,0.00009857047,0.00076264987,0.0000590368,0.000029048855,0.0012974148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930104,0.000019573696,0.0057778875,0.00091308757,0.000017758488,0.00012444932,0.0000014841437,0.0000032718096,0.00013210303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214625,0.000033971522,0.0006945371,0.00044400585,0.0060497327,0.0006315123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759975,0.0035643252,0.0010307399,0.00055161613,0.01869819,0.00015762109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04533602,0.00012854526,0.0003529325,0.033723235,0.0023637537,0.002246439,0.004290093,0.00010563655,0.0000048924953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016023926,0.000062433515,0.00030864138,0.5591926,0.0029793058,0.0014435858,0.0008520325,0.00056149706,0.000009730927],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094230876,0.0001103958,0.19684324,0.00004141822,0.00076263834,7.0306555e-8,0.026460275,0.00064831175,0.13253434,0.034240298,0.09119098,0.5170738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043179345,0.00066882453,0.13601664,0.000009821808,0.0003014823,0.0000012538468,0.4298768,0.17566682,0.062019404,0.0029233133,0.1917099,0.0003739356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000649875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020170366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52546936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105626204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048243842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2044132506","doi":"10.1111/jan.12610","title":"Measuring research success via bibliometrics: where they fit and how they help and hinder","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.47244444723271695,"score_gpt":0.5649713516395085,"score_spread":0.09252690440679157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044132506","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09100768,0.07299497,0.008449297,0.0055577466,0.8194989,0.00073919573,0.00008665211,0.00003324009,0.0016323088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4844909,0.038983915,0.0063708415,0.000025909972,0.46751156,0.000008390592,0.0000051082393,0.00016892084,0.0024344448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96086794,0.0015213919,0.0014953916,0.0012504309,0.033408016,0.0014568033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9193636,0.046699878,0.002562287,0.0012035768,0.02856047,0.0016101464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.082523435,0.00050445594,0.0014937815,0.32105607,0.00092307426,0.010722333,0.0037146232,0.0009566201,0.00003725413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15854229,0.00034612653,0.00030085057,0.18562146,0.0005926423,0.0027644965,0.00085608783,0.003883676,0.000011623538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019804656,0.000098148426,0.0018417849,0.00007128579,0.000045913665,0.00005363551,0.000314834,0.00008008822,0.00058113236,0.0000139602635,0.54479194,0.45190927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030961158,0.0019779506,0.004694682,0.002127862,0.000076639015,0.00021940468,0.0031672523,0.0010078453,0.00036585404,0.04007782,0.9422904,0.0008981491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006194797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008529039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45101112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070797483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007204814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044326206","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2","title":"A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Sample (material); Impact factor; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.5726813817650799,"score_gpt":0.5567807477511177,"score_spread":0.015900634013962134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044326206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728765,0.00912236,0.01575318,0.0004166511,0.00052818324,0.00027749315,0.000022548435,0.000018153753,0.0009849267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885912,0.0006787465,0.009100274,0.000081218095,0.000061686624,0.0000022913212,0.000003677136,0.000009933621,0.001471007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797834,0.00024062127,0.0012943669,0.0010849801,0.016842943,0.0007536688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97244275,0.020947376,0.00067869056,0.00073543336,0.004372299,0.00082347664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061583053,0.0001795445,0.0003808583,0.24832967,0.00020909487,0.0036119826,0.0018837327,0.00020708622,0.0002956545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19217694,0.00014401932,0.000095451316,0.5391781,0.00028726715,0.0039991075,0.0009399208,0.00033359253,0.00013273461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005946088,0.00004929365,0.82608587,0.000006706121,0.000004549861,0.000005882124,0.0008868973,0.00003081033,0.012182006,0.0002786964,0.0011107539,0.15929906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007069465,0.00019801552,0.9824387,0.0000535971,0.0000056810386,0.0000019660008,0.00080319255,0.0018490063,0.005668396,0.0061341,0.0019612918,0.00017911794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008616144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068535877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2908484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003777984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043073774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742234},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2044671206","doi":"10.3917/riss.168.0269","title":"Évolution des modes de financement de la recherche (1960-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale des sciences sociales","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9313555850670325,"score_gpt":0.6443014754273197,"score_spread":0.2870541096397128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044671206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.729481,0.03368393,0.08728851,0.003300932,0.0008431954,0.00022912584,0.00007475944,0.000039972943,0.14505857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7671604,0.036876116,0.07330409,0.00017044655,0.00066863454,0.000035116653,0.0000045710694,0.000016741762,0.121763855],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904169,0.0027238238,0.0007581188,0.0008811143,0.0039377566,0.0012823147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97326034,0.023333494,0.00039627156,0.00032607655,0.0022412299,0.00044259083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057015628,0.0002563832,0.0003248284,0.010723722,0.0016476233,0.0033791584,0.0030344957,0.00048465325,0.0011722781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07902359,0.00024296193,0.0002925097,0.06595542,0.013993569,0.0015822314,0.0005214278,0.0006204292,0.0003549412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029254117,0.0004136595,0.25075758,0.000038940605,0.000030916897,0.000049939143,0.00256161,0.0030446732,0.0011771617,0.09721662,0.0015948211,0.6430848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005334571,0.00023750088,0.095881216,0.00031884966,0.000018583563,0.00023510536,0.0015889289,0.10023955,0.00064606476,0.7180549,0.081897326,0.00034851552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005412234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011982617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011770252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062009464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046328526","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450440112","title":"The future of institutional repositories: The experts (and audience) debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Scholarly communication; Publication; Public relations; Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Publishing; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08386701705862125,"score_gpt":0.4368450572268911,"score_spread":0.35297804016826984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046328526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98592013,0.00038301456,0.00061285566,0.011340821,0.00024064066,0.0002884838,0.000005501008,0.000012559337,0.0011960175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760526,0.00060478196,0.0014483124,0.00025488646,0.00003063925,0.000013506528,7.8830006e-8,0.0000012676045,0.000041239444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597716,0.0000027857213,0.0005195068,0.00018405088,0.0029665031,0.0003500146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132884,0.00089319225,0.000908077,0.00021898173,0.006582447,0.00006845346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018230122,0.00007205484,0.00014728223,0.0026188134,0.0017926709,0.00056490954,0.0021987841,0.000049308557,4.1724059e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011993676,0.000029428906,0.00008666113,0.07368118,0.01046959,0.0014735304,0.0008281269,0.00012582811,3.864407e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028742106,0.000013507524,0.03779512,0.000012160713,0.000014321002,1.7552765e-8,0.0027788486,0.0000010416793,0.009728084,0.1862517,0.005761597,0.75761485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049338065,0.00050815416,0.10918553,0.000022004711,0.000016142623,0.00007739083,0.21094982,0.003455252,0.06830233,0.038312003,0.56845087,0.0002271035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015902566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020182865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75738776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057684054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023143091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046460409","doi":"10.1108/10650750910961929","title":"Bioline International","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OCLC Systems & Services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Bandwagon effect; Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Flexibility (engineering); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.48290449113346096,"score_gpt":0.5885778883372986,"score_spread":0.10567339720383767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046460409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80411434,0.0070388257,0.0017182872,0.009260089,0.0072695427,0.00048020386,0.00010041281,0.00016401536,0.16985428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270034,0.000140037,0.00018923335,0.00046745825,0.000494469,0.0000043971336,0.000010949935,0.0000052759237,0.005987858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164873,0.0001255732,0.00066174805,0.00056743616,0.006598897,0.00039761013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995897,0.00071511493,0.00026090583,0.00066220114,0.0021851852,0.0002796014],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008790351,0.00012796694,0.00025472423,0.021406895,0.00014753842,0.0038442537,0.0033118948,0.000093639595,0.00042191462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013370805,0.000082796505,0.00010222464,0.057406675,0.00002852844,0.0007133021,0.00025583338,0.000116864765,0.0017526983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011340188,0.00087416114,0.2860591,0.000057736463,0.00011391991,0.00013174124,0.0009470308,0.0007717351,0.010330986,0.054851484,0.080597065,0.56515163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045563836,0.0001433271,0.1879609,0.000035355846,0.00000376784,0.000028787646,0.00096344843,0.03518707,0.00036663888,0.0030879038,0.77153295,0.00023423813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032423655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022922995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69093585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006227991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005074141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047959601","doi":"10.1007/s11999-010-1365-x","title":"Low-income Countries' Orthopaedic Information Needs: Challenges and Opportunities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; The Internet; Internet access; Medicine; Globe; Health care; Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Economic growth; Computer science; Advertising; Economics","score_opus":0.5763091622547795,"score_gpt":0.5698602443635455,"score_spread":0.0064489178912339185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047959601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.941308,0.010313971,0.000048970596,0.018684188,0.0024674567,0.00050730474,0.000037885162,0.00006492546,0.026567256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840765,0.15568855,0.00008795281,0.00022722913,0.00023894908,0.00001709965,0.000009733536,0.000016988679,0.002948479],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98556584,0.0011361305,0.0021696715,0.00066644326,0.009368315,0.0010936097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712167,0.019310806,0.00038874408,0.0010334832,0.0062335436,0.0018167268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11694205,0.00024368828,0.00059727684,0.031065093,0.00088158454,0.0023979386,0.0013784065,0.0009113039,0.0006071746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073889755,0.00016098873,0.00025883963,0.026175959,0.0033094853,0.0015142474,0.0018088656,0.0037496164,0.00045988738],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007616488,0.00011918653,0.05544816,0.000060820566,0.000055069904,0.000084308,0.0007107388,7.276096e-7,0.0000097837265,0.051730037,0.0029222223,0.8887828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020801544,0.0010506541,0.28119645,0.000096496355,0.000018950144,0.00018864748,0.0045706565,0.0040120548,0.000012705043,0.029746505,0.6765858,0.00044097812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020244728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000215552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025104826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065754104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048185449","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0013636","title":"Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":603,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Citation; Logistic regression; Publication bias; Test (biology); Computer science; Psychology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.9343763586818292,"score_gpt":0.7250463403971983,"score_spread":0.20933001828463094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048185449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992107,0.000064514665,0.000172446,0.0012189111,0.00013389897,0.001745198,0.00023227822,0.00006219579,0.0042635957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98374474,0.00007920806,0.009315264,0.000071329894,0.0002083064,0.00023115678,0.00005602327,0.000022686036,0.006271264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849984,0.00088829134,0.00078442483,0.00096870755,0.011411273,0.0009488786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95024025,0.025736576,0.0003279743,0.0014048773,0.021492677,0.00079761224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05436299,0.00016116016,0.00047030344,0.034391582,0.0006614877,0.016175054,0.0080895135,0.00019741405,0.0068696067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17128642,0.00009809204,0.00011527364,0.2099779,0.00013279243,0.0028493698,0.0027317246,0.0006317309,0.0004046715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033405407,0.016316043,0.64839137,0.0001786592,0.0007531697,0.00002134339,0.00027234558,0.0000033310428,0.12667923,0.004165488,0.15869126,0.041187245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002178149,0.0009118643,0.94298035,0.000024125628,0.000032644977,0.0000017363303,0.000083551306,0.003441278,0.020452334,0.01948581,0.010050424,0.00035775066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029010472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009056582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29458898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016029338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048231489","doi":"10.1087/095315107779490599","title":"The impact of open access publishing (and other access initiatives) on use and users of digital scholarly journals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Publishing; Order (exchange); Scholarly communication; Open access publishing; Library science; Electronic publishing; Digital library; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; History; Art; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.800087479290809,"score_gpt":0.6489497974727992,"score_spread":0.1511376818180098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048231489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96235895,0.00052176474,0.0006374635,0.0021767337,0.00015011862,0.0003093043,0.000096770884,0.000009906903,0.033738982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911094,0.00019400829,0.0001068553,0.00022171735,0.00006287738,0.0000022831412,0.00000218814,0.00001931659,0.0002797938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901346,0.00044263896,0.001203709,0.0007131518,0.0067345016,0.0007714061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95939356,0.03153877,0.001518259,0.0009517002,0.0058531077,0.00074460515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06558899,0.00018857648,0.00042276736,0.02532577,0.00055224245,0.61065704,0.011431399,0.00019059231,0.00014349341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37601462,0.00010377262,0.00014407792,0.07250997,0.00037154666,0.26889902,0.0074432893,0.0011333246,0.0000024055919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015555006,0.00006542824,0.88327223,0.00000369759,0.0000543945,0.000005124434,0.00036076814,0.00005577325,0.00012366523,0.0020675855,0.0032588472,0.110576935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070396625,0.00015424845,0.98176724,0.00005447563,0.000004192272,0.000010110121,0.0011996414,0.00035263758,0.00041651365,0.012741831,0.002452223,0.00014294102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026836682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009525381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34175804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011250323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003365711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048348243","doi":"10.1037/a0022466","title":"Commentary: Who measures those who measure? The future of assessing research activity in Canadian psychology.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Applied psychology; Test validity; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7334151713013151,"score_gpt":0.5952892522588137,"score_spread":0.13812591904250138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048348243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7831283,0.0055811177,0.000100174,0.074098535,0.004838573,0.001424266,0.0004652917,0.000038433183,0.13032529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828692,0.0010902637,0.0002919012,0.014790383,0.00027608353,0.00011679028,0.000012361095,0.000067597604,0.00048542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821285,0.004193872,0.0015468675,0.0025741216,0.0037918638,0.0057647647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837123,0.002241591,0.00048438113,0.0045206584,0.0037779587,0.005263068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0701347,0.0006196847,0.001138445,0.067182876,0.0012600968,0.0007833546,0.009917923,0.0011631094,0.0017210606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01214798,0.0004615173,0.0003308843,0.099602684,0.0026037227,0.000883633,0.0003251384,0.0032835682,0.0002202709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105216706,0.00014562804,0.25780025,0.0000048837173,0.000060103022,0.00042981,0.0015784978,0.0000018723294,0.00025797382,0.0012481018,0.4358193,0.30254838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080285757,0.00028548413,0.688313,0.000043186028,0.0000091113525,0.000054709257,0.00159116,0.00003271878,0.00005020831,0.00917138,0.29925632,0.00038985806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9380689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43051273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025709313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004042096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048354789","doi":"10.1159/000337170","title":"Measuring Impact in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: An Analysis of the Top 100 Most Highly Cited Works and the Citation Classics in the Field","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Neurosurgery; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Medical physics; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Psychology; General surgery; Surgery; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30928115407626167,"score_gpt":0.42221666532777635,"score_spread":0.11293551125151469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048354789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99471927,0.0007069916,0.00024788384,0.00294937,0.0009060105,0.00027071452,0.000020842683,0.0000064243463,0.00017250607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982713,0.00019242683,0.0000052748446,0.0012986435,0.0001032292,0.000018953928,0.0000068219288,0.000010003957,0.00009338461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360275,0.0013921105,0.0008337542,0.00053075876,0.0031588061,0.00048179756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733814,0.031051664,0.00041027035,0.0005586804,0.00044455205,0.0001966711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01388006,0.00021674743,0.00046244127,0.012111953,0.00037302118,0.0012519232,0.00033849326,0.000116149764,0.00010435994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015199095,0.000104424995,0.00019740076,0.047574595,0.00035797385,0.0013642642,0.00026183392,0.00059759844,0.0000018146118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000523482,0.00012028169,0.9912564,0.0000056550844,0.000064632026,0.0000032757362,0.00028941935,0.00019838834,0.00007744503,0.00035341,0.00043616936,0.006671433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062675483,0.00006212879,0.9888189,0.000012415016,0.00008432619,0.000025233167,0.0004043572,0.009011168,0.000008421429,0.0004901025,0.00034016249,0.00011602021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025116574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008602137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03546264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004619908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111611036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048980934","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.4.02","title":"Open Access in China: A Study of Social Science Journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"China; Citation; Publishing; Science Citation Index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7070312947661989,"score_gpt":0.6487025814534676,"score_spread":0.05832871331273126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048980934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96964407,0.00019372388,0.00070715765,0.004656361,0.0007539768,0.00023494815,0.0000026997807,0.0000026669882,0.023804404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987939,0.000021057254,0.0005658221,0.00017249728,0.0002682099,0.0000016973759,8.050065e-8,0.000009087565,0.00016765436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635824,0.0013158668,0.0030671512,0.0006489177,0.030597322,0.0007883259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659614,0.0029086561,0.003568907,0.00068350206,0.026144415,0.0007331094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31815714,0.00014167393,0.0007536471,0.1250635,0.0006275426,0.45167425,0.038551953,0.0001321295,0.00026513977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.387506,0.00009358743,0.00015354586,0.26216376,0.00023080429,0.31936148,0.00968482,0.0023780393,0.0000064581545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006890456,0.0008768014,0.8575976,0.0000030718993,0.000015774716,0.00002518692,0.0023080541,0.000068196954,0.0016634811,0.0011218733,0.006341221,0.12990984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001927744,0.0005316552,0.9764983,0.000035883415,0.0000060219945,0.000032768152,0.0038653682,0.00033073602,0.0001896502,0.013082336,0.003389628,0.000109905035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036702168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052527703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13710025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031868045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013283814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049245574","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0004048","title":"The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Pace; Population ageing; Gerontology; Citation; Bibliometrics; Creativity; Worry; Population; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7380393402328145,"score_gpt":0.5335089176316571,"score_spread":0.2045304226011574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049245574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950638,0.0004581916,0.0001662511,0.0023711089,0.00003394122,0.00021632145,0.000004076696,0.000007920544,0.0016784299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996654,0.001363333,0.00017713357,0.00005507875,0.000026571164,0.00001483007,0.0000018470674,0.0000039104007,0.0017033215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927194,0.000240329,0.00025024646,0.00025441623,0.0063056652,0.00022993758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98324835,0.0139842685,0.0001233822,0.0004188023,0.0020814901,0.00014369948],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008444761,0.00004707098,0.00010799541,0.012071699,0.00031455548,0.00052281696,0.00065043493,0.00003416556,0.000030210105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08770615,0.000027449902,0.000022900154,0.03834302,0.00014294697,0.00025425453,0.0001826402,0.00014438081,0.000059083846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033225806,0.0010121734,0.7831024,0.000076004144,0.00006245559,0.0000066839566,0.00088484894,9.928355e-7,0.02311036,0.0021309846,0.0061669964,0.18341286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030063934,0.00032877116,0.9511376,0.000038845687,0.000003867714,7.013059e-7,0.0001267197,0.0016123349,0.04384543,0.0021116333,0.00043488128,0.000058583817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036807476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004591445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18335429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031100157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047476704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049647990","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0099-8","title":"Visualization of citation patterns of some Canadian journals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Visualization; Computer science; Information visualization; Citation analysis; Data science; Information retrieval; Informetrics; Information science; Order (exchange); Library science; Bibliometrics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5363669360498906,"score_gpt":0.5783523202939667,"score_spread":0.04198538424407605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049647990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727825,0.0013094939,0.019304305,0.0003075955,0.0009237425,0.00022610811,0.00019905563,0.00001095551,0.0049362704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770874,0.00013441147,0.00056787365,0.000045736586,0.00008047979,0.0000023007317,0.000016148239,0.000010093128,0.001434199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818531,0.00020489024,0.0013963715,0.0005002524,0.015397932,0.000647441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98569995,0.0022620875,0.00088554656,0.0006113002,0.009994958,0.00054616225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031663522,0.00012957526,0.00036986903,0.34124595,0.00018063834,0.0009568856,0.0019329994,0.00013293732,0.00062331185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047036353,0.000101962505,0.00017372576,0.5154192,0.00015546186,0.0010328296,0.00020736168,0.00012682796,0.00006591029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004307996,0.00014024497,0.9479783,0.000013519589,0.0000065258755,0.0000032999087,0.00009223126,0.0004922885,0.0031071412,0.011792397,0.0054124272,0.030957295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034745983,0.00012371971,0.9666323,0.000016475811,0.000006426451,0.0000025557063,0.00018115583,0.0034991582,0.010575983,0.013076852,0.0053973706,0.00014056156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030472688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00477067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1741732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024677344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006273125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049981895","doi":"10.1515/cclm.2009.327","title":"Journal Impact Factor: it will go away soon","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Operations research; Psychology; Library science; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5947504583832548,"score_gpt":0.6436416375063311,"score_spread":0.04889117912307628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049981895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731397,0.00398812,0.00039814226,0.011269163,0.000690246,0.000114633236,0.00006822895,0.000033189892,0.010298601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906997,0.0022611558,0.00011516541,0.0021608055,0.0020583388,0.0000010777654,0.000005667507,0.000011038328,0.0026870337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913397,0.00033334523,0.0017854844,0.0008404115,0.0050007934,0.00070030056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878944,0.0056622406,0.0005919447,0.00077658705,0.003018182,0.0020566562],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024038292,0.00028672116,0.0008062021,0.0024838606,0.00034609856,0.0007977751,0.0016162568,0.00040584838,0.0050222552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07591071,0.00016416983,0.00024149036,0.033580933,0.00074674503,0.0006259438,0.00020057856,0.0014705147,0.000103927225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018496254,0.00043172232,0.1651271,0.000018430268,0.00006365079,0.00022967876,0.00015942067,0.000005353227,0.012257634,0.000034586206,0.5894316,0.2320559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036167523,0.00194755,0.3300197,0.000117756375,0.00004361075,0.00012501529,0.0008414081,0.00056322216,0.0026051602,0.0061786296,0.653358,0.0005831753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003621292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.9226636e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23147273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009144287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006039467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050885411","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.163.79","title":"Research Trends of Mechanism and Machine Theory Using Bibliometrics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Bibliometrics; Mechanism (biology); Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Social science; Political science; Regional science; History; Library science; Data science; Geography; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6368217407589188,"score_gpt":0.5625886931724329,"score_spread":0.07423304758648597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050885411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016365,0.0025864118,0.091971576,0.00007460565,0.00074533833,0.00031122836,0.00017397595,0.000020342668,0.0024800282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034727,0.001214543,0.008021094,0.000040896568,0.00010236446,0.000012966815,0.0000047386297,0.000022232904,0.00023389765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927632,0.00042862305,0.0007485805,0.00054706674,0.004655252,0.0008572601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947096,0.0029718091,0.0002799116,0.00057790574,0.0009538063,0.0005069567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07586362,0.00018200788,0.00052191823,0.14396073,0.00031191536,0.0010311251,0.00078499713,0.0002036431,0.00067022484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039368966,0.00012825837,0.0000436738,0.19417116,0.000107717446,0.00036081806,0.0015497745,0.00018621137,0.000022756147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004231165,0.000068871705,0.00005798357,0.000015318044,0.000012880072,8.1463685e-7,0.00009766526,1.9419598e-7,0.19349624,0.7587561,0.00014919841,0.04730242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005300266,0.00014507391,0.001028914,0.000008074666,0.000018960405,0.00001816199,0.00078421173,0.00034379985,0.21716975,0.77760345,0.0021319902,0.00021759982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007480814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012182074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08871077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003580588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050810737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943163},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2051214338","doi":"10.7202/800289ar","title":"Information Science: The Canadian Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Discipline; Identification (biology); Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Engineering ethics; Information science; Sociology; Graduate education; Library science; Data science; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.15969466995148446,"score_gpt":0.4137607682439299,"score_spread":0.2540660982924454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051214338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74268144,0.0072627985,0.000060336966,0.21164985,0.013199407,0.000337412,0.0000145201775,0.000007106524,0.024787094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606514,0.000030720028,0.00006941622,0.0024084244,0.000036578098,4.6271592e-7,9.276489e-8,0.0000018178417,0.0013873532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164915,0.000065118744,0.0008188126,0.0002700098,0.0063180374,0.000878847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98857665,0.00022044792,0.0007567768,0.0008438414,0.007822372,0.0017799363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03751995,0.00012242248,0.00030591473,0.122721426,0.0030546626,0.00036051119,0.0070552877,0.000111873596,0.00015014327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044364087,0.000060461327,0.00006909124,0.14998548,0.045479015,0.0016895958,0.00017607269,0.0005633035,0.000007574666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014228981,0.000016766644,0.031258896,0.0000051595875,0.000015971782,0.000038029444,0.010364793,0.000059215417,0.007105375,0.15337403,0.44274348,0.35500404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044854882,0.00036726613,0.14122973,0.000066885856,0.000026241712,0.00049164763,0.009668063,0.0002860753,0.0011271563,0.022708781,0.8234241,0.00015552167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20479253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6633314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45853886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029685565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052598283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051301569","doi":"10.1007/s10508-005-0997-5","title":"The Impact Factor: “Goin’ Up”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.5877188112243503,"score_gpt":0.5868411611024329,"score_spread":0.0008776501219174282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051301569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57643205,0.010368698,0.0007095936,0.36785197,0.0059013367,0.0034543984,0.0065204008,0.00017323322,0.028588297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56763154,0.0023175683,0.0018414678,0.05074696,0.010371208,0.0003277805,0.0005142762,0.00035353072,0.3658957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847951,0.00049910805,0.0013282712,0.0011129971,0.010988933,0.0012755991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976916,0.018926367,0.000789153,0.002191224,0.0008296019,0.00034765992],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039112424,0.0004543022,0.0007364125,0.03300387,0.00046891154,0.0022434304,0.0075813048,0.00044181556,0.0011673946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006444665,0.0002296261,0.00048999285,0.035582345,0.0010477776,0.00033419725,0.0014683895,0.0023072145,0.00053802074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013628075,0.000055339395,0.010138678,0.000003950348,0.000022981289,0.000036679314,0.00013451971,0.0000013318328,0.0005243794,0.000007158636,0.50145614,0.48760524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028961632,0.0005691761,0.19622648,0.000009390887,0.00003375839,0.000022360848,0.00017437276,0.00012535123,0.0003499948,0.00071571127,0.8011168,0.00036696446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033991426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024287721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48723826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007955366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004886372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051771537","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405","title":"The power of altmetrics on a CV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Social media; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1260122823245402,"score_gpt":0.4456347829134141,"score_spread":0.31962250058887387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051771537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379225,0.000120460696,0.0010406155,0.054844752,0.00021382906,0.00073501427,0.000024545105,0.000020842186,0.0050774403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962651,0.0001995271,0.0021638367,0.0010406371,0.0000044917983,0.00003525451,1.7580545e-7,0.0000021842036,0.00028876594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474645,0.000022736873,0.00057954766,0.00019086586,0.0041037216,0.00035666252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836017,0.0029462965,0.00099154,0.00076599076,0.0068588313,0.00007717804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012656623,0.00007769094,0.00020161895,0.0071620354,0.0006609843,0.00047698166,0.0030485592,0.000051269333,0.000028219029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042929877,0.00003601714,0.0001650493,0.11851637,0.0060110386,0.00031097565,0.00078053435,0.00014545002,0.000051267372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016305103,0.000046577643,0.006585426,0.0000064647134,0.000017455754,1.2176167e-8,0.00036596708,0.000011439217,0.0014495503,0.037731472,0.19965075,0.75411856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040729568,0.0008349729,0.06514032,0.000008471907,0.0000053274202,0.000004289449,0.015883628,0.002124711,0.008306456,0.013301253,0.89384586,0.00013742212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074338925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.235553e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7539812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048968348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020770433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996694},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2053904592","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2013.06.012","title":"Rate and Predictors of the Conversion of Abstracts Presented at the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress Scientific Meetings to Full Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Peer review; Library science; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.21307298930433674,"score_gpt":0.40276341867093046,"score_spread":0.18969042936659372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053904592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749648,0.0029908123,0.00004646757,0.01627856,0.0020596837,0.00051443215,0.00013993536,0.0000011577727,0.0030041605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997719,0.00006411686,0.000024268687,0.00009183123,0.00009015806,0.0000057324637,0.0000025273512,0.000006032477,0.001996328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495,0.0007968295,0.00087008474,0.0003029624,0.002568417,0.0005117354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98340267,0.0014884579,0.0005576175,0.0009215978,0.012085622,0.0015440222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025399381,0.000109743225,0.00053711276,0.013661332,0.00062317715,0.0006773425,0.0022379581,0.00011975735,0.0001542615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042693324,0.00005782555,0.00040757697,0.025392864,0.0012779826,0.00026274292,0.00022194849,0.00026826537,0.00003127077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000866842,0.0000027678134,0.38181338,0.000015189169,0.00029161287,0.000008026615,0.00031239097,0.0027258995,0.0012430204,0.00010205855,0.6091126,0.00436438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001461007,0.000044446966,0.44574812,0.000012554733,0.000030905376,0.000047975267,0.00018519755,0.00004183482,0.0005089176,0.000095479554,0.553093,0.000045416815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11252488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1764017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06393475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000261663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00317152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054290911","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-4817","title":"When postpublication peer review stings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science","score_opus":0.30855041255434634,"score_gpt":0.510706414487853,"score_spread":0.2021560019335067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054290911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075848848,0.0031373696,0.0033435887,0.91559154,0.0015389476,0.00017146529,0.000027514243,0.000019706613,0.06858497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5550544,0.012994834,0.0030007083,0.3037512,0.008044106,0.000029733184,0.000082528684,0.00006474601,0.11697774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96536845,0.0007366675,0.0008892429,0.00030789632,0.03202335,0.00067438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598261,0.0044078496,0.00072715315,0.0004209304,0.02972973,0.0048882263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14442211,0.00009472834,0.00026563508,0.014653142,0.00043627407,0.0025484012,0.0020139685,0.0002629753,0.016184162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.626073,0.00006741068,0.00014742729,0.040557455,0.000040083884,0.00056977227,0.000088404144,0.00095743954,0.0022044063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1557315e-7,0.000006477405,0.029481666,0.0000029741154,0.0000055435935,0.000008050979,0.00002818548,1.8527359e-7,8.628689e-7,0.00047769505,0.70108193,0.26890612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001872849,0.000029253022,0.050243467,0.000084197876,0.00000396308,0.000081753766,0.000038090304,0.0008154776,0.0000016241768,0.0052145883,0.94321704,0.00008323894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010788022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028512378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61184037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008556977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025613017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054475857","doi":"10.1177/0883073808331366","title":"Impact Factor Wars: Episode V—The Empire Strikes Back","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Child Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Factor (programming language); Psychology; History; Psychoanalysis; Ancient history; Computer science","score_opus":0.29316972150025267,"score_gpt":0.5416591324474231,"score_spread":0.24848941094717047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054475857","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02434583,0.004327313,0.00016626291,0.065037616,0.9031333,0.00033440566,0.00041188172,0.000012263774,0.0022311711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04603932,0.0048785424,0.00003512794,0.0044058356,0.942813,0.0000016210795,0.000013316615,0.00006596721,0.0017472941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97728807,0.0014927335,0.0023464835,0.00080417405,0.017012132,0.0010564337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96110964,0.027509931,0.0031132728,0.0012115845,0.0063431147,0.0007124501],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015878571,0.00048586566,0.0014650127,0.046378523,0.0003283101,0.002266183,0.008428822,0.0013005352,0.002296308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097217895,0.00023524046,0.0013144014,0.05373564,0.00035132948,0.00060572114,0.0006438622,0.005709856,0.00042883324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026606573,0.00014493428,0.0035016988,0.0000030180786,0.00006686189,0.0001506253,0.000023691715,0.000080747224,0.000007756885,0.000002657091,0.9385067,0.057245232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007620568,0.0033836898,0.039488845,0.000014388828,0.000025476475,0.00024736937,0.000003058705,0.00006631311,0.000020683865,0.0013945942,0.9543924,0.00020112284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002987966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001949698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08133932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001229126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011341189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055778626","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0127-6","title":"Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Measure (data warehouse); Exploratory research; Information science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.5600534252037995,"score_gpt":0.6469165712479984,"score_spread":0.08686314604419887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055778626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764564,0.0005082302,0.0003535739,0.00045571275,0.00018457317,0.0007256606,0.000036863228,0.00003782187,0.021241168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985774,0.00012096288,0.0005429459,0.00014613982,0.000029634992,0.0000071998725,0.0000028864551,0.0000060860125,0.00056672737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9561572,0.00056408497,0.0012993098,0.0011726125,0.03947521,0.0013316008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97893137,0.0051108007,0.0005062384,0.0018343744,0.011947321,0.0016699069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10394198,0.00023225548,0.0005910348,0.5961124,0.0010874551,0.010722064,0.0039037208,0.00013685107,0.0005129838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12828812,0.00015568691,0.00025607346,0.90832627,0.0013261617,0.01781663,0.0017556424,0.0005703786,0.00019395647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008595954,0.0009263084,0.7521572,0.0000069711987,0.00008751387,0.00044349825,0.0047021722,0.00012802746,0.0004229229,0.0031077694,0.0010119859,0.23691969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011095102,0.0036274106,0.96178657,0.000010134071,0.000078255536,0.00045882454,0.015711246,0.0092134625,0.0010591149,0.0045524635,0.0020264208,0.00036657284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042754295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052949426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3122139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018141737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015132255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99592066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056445822","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0010","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056445822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964039,0.021743089,0.0063054026,0.04776792,0.0048840316,0.00022423283,0.000051802173,0.000021208301,0.02259841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844636,0.0009922826,0.0044904645,0.0005080104,0.0018491471,0.0000015785827,0.0000021262404,0.00004079084,0.007652025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94940376,0.0017794955,0.00533766,0.0006332983,0.04131675,0.0015290595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906631,0.013196798,0.007354958,0.0013817713,0.08584669,0.0015566972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2426471,0.0003150076,0.00079749426,0.05885836,0.001704326,0.7083249,0.016251445,0.00037027118,0.00020023923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4286284,0.00017608967,0.0007863065,0.120495245,0.00038449236,0.4241893,0.0015302089,0.008677665,0.000039827846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019614608,0.00032562614,0.16621093,0.000007703108,0.00013161024,0.00020985256,0.000468503,0.00055667263,0.0035423567,0.003603014,0.3993083,0.42543927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020120714,0.00053077046,0.24496739,0.00009730576,0.000031593845,0.0009982442,0.0015374713,0.00045444752,0.0010107914,0.18816835,0.5598605,0.00033106454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040050215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065221684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42510822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007515392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035206825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057169622","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0010","title":"The Impact of Submission Experiences on Perceptions of Journal Quality and Editorial Support: The Viewpoint of Chinese Authors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33476998793629176,"score_gpt":0.5821611179379163,"score_spread":0.2473911300016245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057169622","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41983938,0.0021434117,0.00008335725,0.0012302184,0.576203,0.00013197574,0.00010958913,0.0000018540428,0.0002572336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48263806,0.0020059205,0.0001357941,0.000007857704,0.51503384,0.0000022060121,0.0000033390459,0.00001788141,0.0001550783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94901323,0.0031932304,0.005457076,0.00046390455,0.041078128,0.00079441135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8016788,0.07912589,0.025080858,0.0022181142,0.08955635,0.0023399992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24105868,0.00036092452,0.0013485841,0.02192605,0.00096617494,0.04130628,0.0079680635,0.0010589631,0.0003456837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58672863,0.00013935789,0.0012976301,0.03527428,0.000800294,0.02870993,0.0011033536,0.0076607056,0.0000023341267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036639554,0.00021412186,0.043608703,0.000017411332,0.00011664168,0.000002228379,0.004394237,0.000014730685,0.0006830842,0.000028508086,0.93738306,0.013170911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027383468,0.0051008435,0.45276994,0.00053187064,0.00012902736,0.00013198136,0.029569093,0.000052518793,0.0001436207,0.01343595,0.4948198,0.0005770074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032762406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009736096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44256324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003547917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003524059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058244584","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0010204","title":"Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Citation; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.830204442325836,"score_gpt":0.6593123227215533,"score_spread":0.17089211960428274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058244584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99179167,0.00011317141,0.0068353196,0.0003006048,0.000044334156,0.00025774672,0.00005649736,0.000009121245,0.0005915624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854254,0.000057599867,0.014371868,0.00005976473,0.00004131349,0.000004620218,5.658344e-7,0.000006922324,0.000031917873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826573,0.00035377915,0.0008786158,0.00051373313,0.015141777,0.00045480902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991605,0.003363838,0.00032745738,0.00055928517,0.0030653519,0.0010790912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01986969,0.0001461479,0.0005229097,0.012276234,0.00015330724,0.0012652278,0.0014937805,0.00015560105,0.0008764115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06263377,0.00008536661,0.00009675922,0.040274218,0.00027559232,0.0006352821,0.0006891857,0.00069962203,0.000012928086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001077151,0.0009043398,0.7509352,0.000008237168,0.000049526374,0.0000011899045,0.00034999702,0.000015188612,0.240466,0.0003376511,0.000030899868,0.006890987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022166505,0.0001405151,0.9513477,0.00003658551,0.00000746386,0.000002662173,0.00027248537,0.023894023,0.022721466,0.0012343262,0.0000067262304,0.00011439492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072851323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052459145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21774454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007965163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052086014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058498906","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y","title":"Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Productivity; Scientometrics; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Social science","score_opus":0.872966831153213,"score_gpt":0.6254438142378042,"score_spread":0.2475230169154089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058498906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955975,0.0003410447,0.00036256813,0.000091500915,0.00015208228,0.00030880512,0.00005928618,0.000015664875,0.0030715687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969999,0.00009431289,0.0003836482,0.0000030843282,0.000013581109,0.0000019112956,0.0000023901964,0.000006587633,0.0024945633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272353,0.0013595909,0.0006469616,0.0013847505,0.012784578,0.0011005736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875354,0.00497048,0.00034513656,0.0012781391,0.0049561406,0.00091468595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09664137,0.00017537712,0.00069418584,0.4405308,0.0003897616,0.0007019419,0.0031819332,0.0001542178,0.00048667061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059531037,0.00012562706,0.00017343384,0.766765,0.0012252252,0.0014253677,0.0014101858,0.0005116217,0.00001835959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039398612,0.0005245767,0.96795774,0.000005277978,0.00005193958,0.000009488515,0.003533811,0.000011560521,0.0001515115,0.0005357205,0.00010656422,0.027072396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002270595,0.0003935306,0.9861859,0.0000036472331,0.000029198762,8.675518e-7,0.004411916,0.0073114973,0.00036163637,0.00073248474,0.0001932674,0.00014899974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046965227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018731663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32623416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005574236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008836918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917394},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2058522712","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065","title":"Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Workflow; Task (project management); Computer science; Peer review; Productivity; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); The Internet; Medical education; Process management; Knowledge management; Psychology; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business; Engineering; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.5988927263084287,"score_gpt":0.5831837063684046,"score_spread":0.01570901994002416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058522712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19378375,0.02051956,0.028686408,0.06355587,0.004017506,0.0018136494,0.00006867334,0.00027408756,0.68728054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8015609,0.0014699816,0.0039828853,0.009033205,0.0003595646,0.000011130734,0.00001090097,0.00004704942,0.18352441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817473,0.0001690582,0.0008131333,0.00082166673,0.015644783,0.0008040237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912999,0.0017966067,0.00022661607,0.0011079749,0.005052941,0.0005159197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05000011,0.00016172143,0.00032048288,0.020517422,0.00026245613,0.0020228343,0.0023394318,0.00006278791,0.001019126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08620662,0.00011108577,0.00019244006,0.12399817,0.00016855876,0.00058996934,0.0006342428,0.0004024489,0.0018158164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012082414,0.0001305615,0.010846274,0.000051432475,0.0000035145663,0.00029611695,0.000032304568,4.5583678e-7,0.0083239935,0.00047996934,0.6422054,0.33761784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019191037,0.0000894492,0.11806746,0.00003836685,0.0000056053987,0.000049024376,0.00003481614,0.00020882161,0.0025374452,0.0010000379,0.8776187,0.00015840761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042248328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012066426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6077771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006809944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010097288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058941387","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.191","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Global recession; Public relations; Looming; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.481080741475642,"score_gpt":0.5300071964514028,"score_spread":0.048926454975760814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058941387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542613,0.0045297695,0.008149809,0.021495895,0.00076873024,0.00007245887,0.00000396461,0.000010290925,0.01070778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991954,0.00021159693,0.0074599804,0.0011609638,0.00039651906,1.7601796e-7,2.7045456e-7,0.0000065456247,0.00084443094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855702,0.00026537885,0.0012087135,0.00035648377,0.012108116,0.00049113197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98265344,0.0032645473,0.000883103,0.00040343363,0.01192151,0.00087398087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06994426,0.00012612646,0.00036785088,0.046260014,0.00030660944,0.1969589,0.003011717,0.0001809156,0.00015213975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26409796,0.00008246854,0.00015517256,0.06493039,0.000067262954,0.10494345,0.00042059834,0.0017800365,0.00002242154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004429249,0.0001129105,0.19448349,0.0000025039585,0.000021982774,0.00013397171,0.0003500829,0.000030503998,0.0036627285,0.0031589235,0.05917596,0.73882264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012166441,0.00061192113,0.8347612,0.00005826179,0.000017427215,0.00047098205,0.0014853446,0.0017034934,0.00031312963,0.07167039,0.087448634,0.00024257015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012612137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017491566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73858005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013223442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028181347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96454984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059132269","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0030","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Hegemony; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059132269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98414063,0.004373451,0.0012158346,0.0061941138,0.00067504257,0.00016878065,0.000010540077,0.0000045936804,0.0032170024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950859,0.000057780773,0.0016542295,0.0012587961,0.001856829,0.0000034738312,4.3492398e-7,0.000007798183,0.00007474462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889376,0.0003226789,0.0010943175,0.0002307876,0.008581516,0.00083310955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805934,0.0072194533,0.0011186053,0.00014224091,0.0033088753,0.00015149248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19473776,0.00012427499,0.00031246076,0.030271608,0.0013794876,0.12705326,0.0036175349,0.00018834474,0.00002451642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0945478,0.00006624651,0.00020460365,0.029605202,0.0003009613,0.10178787,0.00045716987,0.002191873,0.0000020322025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067013,0.000048995593,0.89017755,0.000010083864,0.000016929336,0.0000049256737,0.0070512705,0.000011444059,0.0005374215,0.0065654903,0.040308416,0.055236794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011421485,0.00037192833,0.8520878,0.000076195814,0.0000187212,0.00027057467,0.030959884,0.0005144723,0.00010682985,0.023537464,0.090694286,0.00021970997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004955195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005375439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019034697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032036824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059295110","doi":"10.1087/20110208","title":"Casting a wide net: the Journal Impact Factor numerator","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Computer science; Citation; Search engine indexing; Order (exchange); Information retrieval; Factor (programming language); Library science; Operations research; Data science; Mathematics; Political science; Economics; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.7798100006849009,"score_gpt":0.5630907595030051,"score_spread":0.21671924118189578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059295110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950699,0.0008966928,0.010694506,0.003689573,0.0011550391,0.00019628143,0.000021548061,0.000053375432,0.03259399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655473,0.00004848272,0.0009442623,0.0005635262,0.00033609528,0.000002227043,0.0000010938986,0.000020319609,0.0015292664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98847836,0.0008616942,0.0007874076,0.0004908503,0.00831759,0.0010641047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855953,0.00860563,0.00059453485,0.00088197575,0.0034691135,0.00085344625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042096473,0.00019029439,0.00027327173,0.020683266,0.0011162203,0.037317175,0.0053291866,0.00015786942,0.005851321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18069,0.0000935817,0.00025634305,0.09891085,0.0001329855,0.008520888,0.0009314531,0.0016253536,0.00042435236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004667965,0.00006178444,0.52119356,0.0000015431672,0.000040571726,0.00004808822,0.0040406706,0.000059573023,0.00029131147,0.00020504634,0.079929866,0.39408132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007873478,0.00032970417,0.87602836,0.000022135286,0.000014079695,0.00037364344,0.0060639656,0.008673671,0.0005074557,0.015483939,0.09125052,0.000465186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001097011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004864392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39361614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017713296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000490805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99505746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059600429","doi":"10.1177/016224390202700101","title":"Outline for a History of Science Measurement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Work (physics); Foundation (evidence); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Statistics; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.7704066506741,"score_gpt":0.5689810652915762,"score_spread":0.20142558538252375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059600429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506014,0.004558901,0.004175382,0.003037751,0.0021714377,0.0009404613,0.000014265508,0.00024630985,0.03425407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909755,0.000033149576,0.004385201,0.00006266729,0.000033852517,0.00003607131,1.3210297e-7,0.000008418328,0.004464999],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806763,0.000045227876,0.0008874415,0.0014198794,0.015809821,0.0011613184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456734,0.00044943095,0.00046860747,0.001725967,0.012467568,0.00032109802],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0610751,0.00017592325,0.00040501947,0.14704888,0.0014662212,0.00044510316,0.0097591765,0.00012647068,0.00046291234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07029786,0.00012974364,0.00013678487,0.2222201,0.0350021,0.0011063734,0.0013369556,0.0002460835,0.00011984939],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008838147,0.0005923008,0.016159885,0.000013224176,0.0000100608595,0.0000039543975,0.0015140683,0.000022615544,0.6945354,0.089829706,0.033707503,0.16360244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002150512,0.0030705326,0.026465517,0.000073112074,0.00003435514,0.000029283534,0.0049992097,0.039690964,0.25951755,0.5087103,0.15420005,0.0010586076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018449966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008621544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43501785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001600116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010711302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983376},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2059619485","doi":"10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z","title":"Conflict(s) of Interest in Peer Review: Its Origins and Possible Solutions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Conflict of interest; Philosophy of science; Process (computing); Peer review; Cover (algebra); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.8245981317172449,"score_gpt":0.5811456072251607,"score_spread":0.2434525244920842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059619485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96842396,0.011252237,0.001054736,0.016950278,0.00038176848,0.00032475594,0.00001451143,0.000018893656,0.0015788618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257094,0.006036194,0.0006138901,0.00021974067,0.000011608544,0.00000844451,3.795758e-7,0.0000033785352,0.00053541997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952165,0.00003537156,0.00036126026,0.00035684902,0.0036274844,0.00040254885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974574,0.002354812,0.00008495802,0.00037249055,0.0070824376,0.00035956656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037300754,0.000077975186,0.00018607863,0.012317161,0.00015077418,0.00070871395,0.0008152829,0.00008396127,0.00005645334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10009887,0.000055453103,0.000020679376,0.057805482,0.00044790405,0.00086977275,0.00047512047,0.00047675002,0.000030077432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008385509,0.0003341664,0.08476622,0.0018065519,0.000024645584,0.000020771065,0.00706814,0.0013027369,0.18486027,0.49436894,0.053657286,0.1717819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066221476,0.00030048063,0.5518294,0.0011830438,0.000010127535,0.000044472923,0.001018207,0.2435316,0.0062401057,0.007649929,0.18685174,0.00067866896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020780016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025376465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48671898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053565775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029044703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988774},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2060388267","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.050125","title":"Providing open access to research, one article at a time","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Public access; Work (physics); Internet privacy","score_opus":0.6977801535377096,"score_gpt":0.6367479066123305,"score_spread":0.06103224692537912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060388267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5745256,0.00019586165,0.00020200852,0.37686163,0.00041803467,0.0004901944,0.0000407151,0.000011032594,0.047254913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94112587,0.0001295342,0.000998406,0.017322216,0.002202606,0.000025677546,0.0000032480605,0.000020915248,0.03817153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97205776,0.00094705645,0.000790947,0.0004612318,0.024365013,0.0013779863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98094064,0.0042055612,0.00022075525,0.00034777122,0.0070907758,0.0071944823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11451741,0.00009173774,0.00026128,0.029096724,0.0013311155,0.018565694,0.0077437633,0.00024859377,0.04182725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24232888,0.00007156435,0.00008455178,0.09707123,0.000062332794,0.0022697884,0.0021824746,0.0011417033,0.01590272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008050026,0.0000394871,0.04411159,4.2351928e-7,0.000012926348,0.000065856126,0.00015433658,0.000013031146,0.00010800619,0.00012434108,0.7191441,0.23621783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048707,0.00007109072,0.06388305,0.000027673726,0.0000018343122,0.000049177248,0.000112614376,0.0025038656,0.00028830627,0.0019191559,0.9305366,0.00011955976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034312191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05068176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36660025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050535346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00511771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060460295","doi":"10.1002/asi.10131","title":"A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in <i>JASIST</i> and the <i>Journal of Documentation</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Distribution (mathematics); Period (music); Geography; Library science; Regional science; Demography; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22292296724816335,"score_gpt":0.5036120534564672,"score_spread":0.28068908620830385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060460295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806368,0.00051054603,0.010399541,0.007958334,0.0001187071,0.00018461079,0.00001203356,0.0000018029394,0.00017765233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977339,0.0006511419,0.0013763906,0.00021448976,0.000011219921,0.0000015552687,1.4161154e-7,0.0000011106872,0.000010074267],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953867,0.00007572194,0.0012122298,0.000070762275,0.0030497846,0.0002048005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990404,0.0015817467,0.0031314448,0.00019103367,0.0046186424,0.0000731079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027883178,0.00006215528,0.00034811842,0.0050755157,0.00027751585,0.00034096788,0.0014771938,0.00004612785,0.0000036902818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017060727,0.000029241819,0.00015494027,0.05841393,0.0037335698,0.0019406386,0.0002451755,0.00028149548,5.216468e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003047833,0.00017051706,0.27861318,0.000028987475,0.000056469915,3.055159e-7,0.009166991,0.0002037241,0.002706915,0.03208961,0.033527423,0.6431311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015975602,0.0052194907,0.22761525,0.00018261296,0.00022054506,0.00092305,0.2865311,0.15201771,0.032366782,0.17836045,0.100005016,0.0005823906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010842876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013041418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6425487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092058726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015732474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063748664","doi":"10.3152/095820210x12827366906562","title":"Evaluation of RT&amp;D: from 'prescriptions for justifying' to 'user-oriented guidance for learning'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Subject (documents); Frame (networking); Work (physics); Production (economics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Library science; Telecommunications; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.9214874769191007,"score_gpt":0.7382062644885964,"score_spread":0.18328121243050433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063748664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8297005,0.00038566513,0.15867896,0.002026296,0.0012595151,0.006122961,0.00031971844,0.000026921674,0.0014794472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630483,0.00002150575,0.031724494,0.000025548658,0.00042035754,0.0023897563,0.00020042429,0.000027955419,0.0021416831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9487519,0.003005771,0.0013058148,0.0014012244,0.044437494,0.001097789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8613927,0.02066744,0.00041106556,0.0014386242,0.11551323,0.0005769756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3381659,0.00016153303,0.0003359653,0.028728655,0.00084163627,0.0010226091,0.0017881972,0.000223854,0.0016498595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63737196,0.00013495346,0.0002125975,0.063060075,0.00020212907,0.00064206286,0.00042148074,0.00056512404,0.00029744595],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029430157,0.00035470616,0.007244354,0.000022563107,0.000050206065,7.589731e-8,0.00085483736,0.005258603,0.27691302,0.0031671785,0.07591759,0.62992257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027552377,0.00064213,0.064569935,0.00003301357,0.00009633789,4.1122442e-7,0.00084897695,0.62349385,0.014164382,0.07212773,0.22103783,0.00023015068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033075668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080569723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62969244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004584949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019308593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064104126","doi":"10.1108/07378831011076675","title":"International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998‐2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Library science; Citation; Subject (documents); Visibility; Science Citation Index; Value (mathematics); Political science; Country of origin; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Law; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.34286646410962296,"score_gpt":0.5211498867667314,"score_spread":0.1782834226571084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064104126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236009,0.00007730139,0.00008933849,0.0028261282,0.0036811403,0.00026208485,0.000080692706,0.00012662566,0.0692558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522355,0.00004000419,0.0026709584,0.00005487466,0.0003557679,0.000016013728,0.000038969803,0.000019907671,0.044568013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98953605,0.00013856277,0.0005545571,0.00089161407,0.008272971,0.0006062313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641335,0.0009823012,0.000174858,0.0010172339,0.00088632555,0.0005259025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008620826,0.00013719658,0.00016958255,0.04299473,0.000540235,0.013266462,0.0039831717,0.00018648412,0.0054022474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010677596,0.00010677148,0.000097729346,0.14264019,0.00055923965,0.0057692523,0.0012480092,0.00069408375,0.0013062472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006565982,0.00019238614,0.75937766,0.000009413783,0.000017450557,0.00007324414,0.00039113537,0.000013387975,0.07005577,0.0030179273,0.1294086,0.037377357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038414658,0.000036121466,0.3241333,0.0000065101535,0.0000012217358,0.0000060905368,0.00036182406,0.002886638,0.012837481,0.005510747,0.65365714,0.00017878701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002530153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003428875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52424854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004619415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032108786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065018034","doi":"10.1186/1471-2474-11-4","title":"Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Medicine; Ranking (information retrieval); Significant difference; Demography; Internal medicine; Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.2645278143175414,"score_gpt":0.5116751969004314,"score_spread":0.24714738258288999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065018034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942226,0.013512335,0.03528189,0.0434163,0.0020384467,0.0032467206,0.00718819,0.00008688133,0.0010066283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909165,0.0025502394,0.005990303,0.014326771,0.0018074596,0.00024474278,0.002984522,0.00020292962,0.0028013668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983265,0.00076646113,0.0020985394,0.0017343586,0.010872829,0.0012628319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789315,0.011952598,0.0018019737,0.0013864223,0.0053274515,0.0006000741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01208518,0.0007296033,0.001851508,0.14099312,0.0004303507,0.0037160113,0.0025565017,0.0016775294,0.0024869712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032366004,0.0004991755,0.004239489,0.18324932,0.00067151117,0.0009807263,0.00048202553,0.002953303,0.000027095943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014663828,0.00020833158,0.4133357,0.0006198653,0.0018087089,0.000013493571,0.00027639678,0.00010206708,0.00042233086,0.000020031966,0.49214447,0.09090198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018505125,0.00047970805,0.8783621,0.000096220196,0.0010200316,0.000004405839,0.00015397569,0.011844521,0.000004971807,0.0032302353,0.102081574,0.0008717288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017960361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006688599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4650264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110849556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006086471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065217297","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-005","title":"The Current State of Open Access in Journals Sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Association (psychology); Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.4486040440155202,"score_gpt":0.5848375414099297,"score_spread":0.13623349739440954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065217297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89937633,0.0070043006,0.00041817862,0.09156458,0.0006171847,0.0005043112,0.000016023205,0.0000019168092,0.000497181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977356,0.0013859461,0.00032671195,0.00008861398,0.00004884844,0.000012404242,1.5091345e-7,0.000005200344,0.00039652103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852933,0.00044581137,0.0015602973,0.00031136748,0.011790059,0.0005991159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93864095,0.011452159,0.0037757386,0.00055209117,0.045211423,0.00036766275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24657454,0.00008745374,0.0003007068,0.031747103,0.0008679463,0.36884713,0.01729032,0.000066613225,0.00001423046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53872895,0.000039793857,0.00006231804,0.13110444,0.00032576802,0.13877909,0.0033923567,0.00168552,0.0000016852904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018579041,0.000043581556,0.20557997,0.0000015652375,0.000009061874,4.1496514e-7,0.000097091746,0.0000054863235,0.0022589748,0.00038770115,0.055031184,0.7365664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007260642,0.0001259992,0.785497,0.00004390477,0.000004397482,0.000014399657,0.00039297342,0.0009067103,0.0010463417,0.15879631,0.05237234,0.00007356878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000128344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002872839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000432391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012724409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065998304","doi":"10.1002/meet.2009.1450460279","title":"Mapping library and information science: Does field delineation matter?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Data science; Set (abstract data type); Citation analysis; Interdisciplinarity; Citation; Information science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Management science; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.072682282443809,"score_gpt":0.41481612185934963,"score_spread":0.34213383941554065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065998304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96512455,0.000022424561,0.0015838379,0.029586364,0.00008383505,0.00035104653,0.000010359136,0.000043170618,0.003194394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807126,0.0002558907,0.008023909,0.0035843747,0.000012629587,0.000011996937,6.231377e-7,0.0000014257046,0.00003789375],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959916,0.000002101505,0.0005663793,0.00023439297,0.0028024928,0.00040303043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478793,0.00024528345,0.0008020893,0.00018930456,0.003858073,0.00011734613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069686975,0.000093441915,0.0001845268,0.014852088,0.0008781124,0.0020773553,0.0018738859,0.000060074733,0.000004786712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00958649,0.000052530704,0.00006676149,0.12631068,0.0029748785,0.029284388,0.0007351653,0.00014478223,0.0000045367683],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014872854,0.0000127953235,0.08099901,0.000021207448,0.0000038511876,4.848771e-9,0.0013370772,0.0000011982651,0.014937472,0.04657168,0.00503808,0.8510628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010270205,0.0010659735,0.44363374,0.000061234176,0.00001545936,0.00003588979,0.07236313,0.045391534,0.17022756,0.0653217,0.2002923,0.00056446047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004124631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.9641962e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041348096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025725705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066797667","doi":"10.1087/095315103321505557","title":"An international peer‐review system for a Chinese scientific journal","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Czech; Political science; Peer review; Library science; World class; Geography; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.5798840455484582,"score_gpt":0.5923638638770029,"score_spread":0.012479818328544723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066797667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4404365,0.017777022,0.15276138,0.0872592,0.0538354,0.0027325125,0.00036849428,0.0003946369,0.24443482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97683793,0.00019202329,0.0064353594,0.000535688,0.00057028927,0.000028631763,0.000045626544,0.000023748045,0.015330718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97978354,0.0006389898,0.0009656298,0.0008898202,0.017005838,0.00071617047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97010064,0.0030439266,0.000652494,0.0011638418,0.024112616,0.00092648086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15194367,0.00015941453,0.0003411122,0.029202918,0.0010088593,0.09964289,0.0056590857,0.00011916112,0.00081824214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3977419,0.00010347671,0.00027584776,0.09287158,0.000098336175,0.012859894,0.00024893164,0.0006254837,0.000152824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037379385,0.0003462808,0.13232712,0.00016937469,0.00006650867,0.000044130127,0.0005130373,0.0002698904,0.0008172735,0.04148811,0.49448752,0.32943338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070236885,0.00008157629,0.0053116623,0.00012242484,0.000008030553,0.00021144008,0.0009582367,0.00681987,0.00006915006,0.008240952,0.9772555,0.00021875955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000151419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011133968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5364014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025279965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006096256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067019328","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0016","title":"Scientometric Analysis of Nuclear Science and Technology Research Output in Iran","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Productivity; Discipline; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Library science; Citation impact; Nuclear science; Work (physics); Social science; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.6918588627989544,"score_gpt":0.5879321123082115,"score_spread":0.10392675049074285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067019328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98655427,0.0035146591,0.00009022208,0.0054263915,0.000450631,0.00010053922,0.000006291957,0.000005717278,0.00385126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685085,0.00020285243,0.0026714369,0.00006850415,0.00008423313,7.404524e-7,1.4665076e-7,0.0000084107205,0.000112798145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95781344,0.00062016933,0.0018580985,0.0005856432,0.037729945,0.001392724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91829026,0.006808144,0.0013790176,0.0010693673,0.07100061,0.0014526119],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41112942,0.0001235384,0.00068161415,0.7130778,0.0005293533,0.059931945,0.0077457046,0.00026412186,0.00007977145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.637932,0.000086873755,0.00013545397,0.87312263,0.0015980494,0.09938844,0.0026929246,0.00277092,0.0000130958815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014937335,0.00018903616,0.9084578,0.0000032303044,0.00004383145,0.0000084647245,0.0005525182,0.000017283792,0.005976557,0.0032343103,0.0022390715,0.07926293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043792187,0.00023866016,0.9790356,0.000022246626,0.00003279605,0.00003309132,0.0047297627,0.0017046079,0.00030595626,0.0019694099,0.011384707,0.00010522631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011403288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011700749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22680256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065535883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088860677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067764901","doi":"10.1186/1472-6920-10-21","title":"Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Promotion (chess); Medicine; Relation (database); Medical journal; Medical education; Psychology; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.37716673005725343,"score_gpt":0.6209975455706522,"score_spread":0.2438308155133988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067764901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536671,0.000009001256,0.0054907063,0.021595953,0.0035373976,0.0003782937,0.000008684728,0.000023349014,0.015289496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898293,0.000012472892,0.0060150838,0.0008972305,0.0003135302,0.0001118823,0.00005935981,0.0000065577924,0.0027545865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056613,0.00023513127,0.0006600585,0.0005571566,0.0076512075,0.00033031654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993245,0.0028118142,0.0001686297,0.00071890646,0.0020994577,0.00095617207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022994656,0.000092079106,0.00013785505,0.024579829,0.0001564839,0.0005934242,0.0012125354,0.00020840926,0.0023086658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16278549,0.000069181784,0.000042307256,0.063595586,0.00006072015,0.0006459733,0.00017254111,0.0006463346,0.0009945515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012211437,0.0006482961,0.3929866,0.0000050163408,9.2850223e-7,1.5981466e-7,0.00024380117,0.000033479708,0.00006398263,0.019417558,0.07416906,0.5124189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016601855,0.0000947674,0.91016173,0.000017049348,6.190234e-7,0.0000019586269,0.00020934975,0.015848141,0.000030294681,0.0011598298,0.07222823,0.00008199773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007116609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018788148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51717514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016782935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041444995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203480","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0084","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations: Report on a Study Funded by a Planning Grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Library science; Business model; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.31479195236960955,"score_gpt":0.4687641151888939,"score_spread":0.15397216281928433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776243,0.0018571599,0.0003918828,0.014651171,0.003077054,0.0002854683,0.000026357477,0.000009778129,0.0020768133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970737,0.00011016787,0.00032338922,0.00034759048,0.0019438692,0.0000025869151,0.0000036316164,0.000016304784,0.00017873947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651853,0.0010722134,0.0026694436,0.0005994817,0.029697856,0.0007757187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9135692,0.017044986,0.008392848,0.0009655765,0.05930892,0.0007184635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2968658,0.00022448045,0.00049883826,0.014794176,0.0071874666,0.5779112,0.007442352,0.0003014826,0.000028978959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40769568,0.000117753596,0.00021574069,0.042958084,0.00076543924,0.22826727,0.0010237263,0.008144926,0.0000013785361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009273567,0.0002254952,0.8462559,0.0000014868748,0.00011786634,0.0000775537,0.005764788,0.0000022445688,0.0041422443,0.001860483,0.03839724,0.10306198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010346392,0.00032887387,0.9041358,0.000035910896,0.000039830873,0.00013902734,0.05244342,0.000059949798,0.0001488319,0.011698104,0.029781353,0.00015425107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038394803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034377913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34964395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045317542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014307769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792784},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2068604254","doi":"10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.006","title":"How well are journal and clinical article characteristics associated with the journal impact factor? a retrospective cohort study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Regression analysis; Retrospective cohort study; MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.22445102465389735,"score_gpt":0.4931338155212634,"score_spread":0.268682790867366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068604254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97303474,0.00033849818,0.00028771185,0.024174748,0.0017421392,0.00023441672,0.000025836789,0.000006724443,0.00015519746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952841,0.00053251936,0.000032002587,0.00050678005,0.0018232581,6.950125e-7,4.2662109e-7,0.000017188851,0.0018030487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.974802,0.004723201,0.0014706266,0.00018594776,0.018140448,0.0006777784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97295463,0.014404936,0.0067671128,0.00039111203,0.0036194534,0.0018627408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08384773,0.00019403215,0.0007406052,0.0031143706,0.00084066775,0.0050577885,0.0022878388,0.00025710693,0.00076738605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15268223,0.00007373607,0.00044370643,0.01900651,0.00021782765,0.0032365653,0.0005465813,0.0033121868,0.000012718736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009356719,0.00063111173,0.94877493,4.6589517e-7,0.00047356662,0.0000382756,0.00027774562,7.158703e-7,0.0000049065497,0.0000047571866,0.046644043,0.0030558947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013474595,0.0007665703,0.99289507,0.00003520752,0.00011824757,0.00032677173,0.0013691932,0.0002494765,0.00000832384,0.00030460104,0.0024745904,0.000104469655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017508033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003045138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0688345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057455484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074076693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068723985","doi":"10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.15","title":"The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology's unique response to a crisis.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Experimental psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.5717731182688975,"score_gpt":0.6444924579416753,"score_spread":0.07271933967277777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068723985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94566697,0.0020047068,0.009192399,0.016428476,0.0005177587,0.0003867815,0.000023222854,0.00002943332,0.025750253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909788,0.001238303,0.0054893526,0.001130743,0.000012407647,0.00005081198,5.4224887e-7,0.000009159918,0.0010899317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405867,0.0021056307,0.000724108,0.0007920839,0.0018423066,0.00047717558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859919,0.010414969,0.00035895247,0.0012499716,0.0016282526,0.00035592966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026233524,0.00014550827,0.00031834136,0.012605179,0.00036389692,0.0004497126,0.0016061476,0.00006697517,0.00007766184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06409494,0.00008363146,0.00007809276,0.09596165,0.001379038,0.00013900574,0.00020357243,0.00023161081,0.00015386558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090256485,0.00045693768,0.060346164,0.000002199138,0.000025634881,0.0000075990765,0.0009770403,0.0000042251195,0.005089816,0.010222625,0.40648445,0.51548076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043422694,0.001600084,0.5427995,0.000007849085,0.000004436352,0.000016766257,0.0060802177,0.00001600601,0.0005122511,0.019315647,0.4290139,0.00019912997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008409545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006220099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5152816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036154328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121237565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069122309","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.004","title":"Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Università Bocconi; European Commission","keywords":"Position (finance); Social connectedness; Exploratory analysis; Process (computing); Network science; Order (exchange); Data science; Sociology; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Complex network; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6759460167148517,"score_gpt":0.6428787603658095,"score_spread":0.03306725634904217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069122309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895003,0.0011457456,0.00057562924,0.007412505,0.000040701823,0.00026017925,0.000015157514,0.000019400692,0.0010303812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991848,0.00026471858,0.00015561287,0.000111995105,0.0001203875,0.0000065436825,0.0000010336037,0.000005074159,0.00014981782],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98425,0.000626305,0.00058483944,0.0009559014,0.012384639,0.0011983004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98560613,0.003685956,0.00018015651,0.0013527418,0.008299977,0.0008750276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1105867,0.0001252791,0.00039753414,0.19610167,0.001480091,0.0030226018,0.003578217,0.00021077016,0.00001788467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07944057,0.000075935495,0.000061259205,0.6007964,0.0055342847,0.001059885,0.0014833657,0.000989258,0.0000062164513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009533296,0.00010330945,0.29888457,0.000004157993,0.000057530127,0.0000062261975,0.0011272082,0.00009716838,0.0031465974,0.017023856,0.0012595592,0.6782803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030779748,0.0006630869,0.88529927,0.000017460401,0.000038655642,0.0000042264624,0.002682596,0.06876666,0.0022698238,0.036641497,0.0031048635,0.000204091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021495993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060737813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6780762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019082753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012130687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998199},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2071194841","doi":"10.3152/147154302781781119","title":"Evaluation of governments’ scientific output: a bibliometric profile of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Political science; Public administration; Quality (philosophy); Discipline; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6015190994652441,"score_gpt":0.5307854672138773,"score_spread":0.07073363225136675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071194841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93986726,0.0012315873,0.000044697044,0.0020313975,0.0004194238,0.0002873029,0.00010783229,0.000005313499,0.05600521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724555,0.00006672729,0.00012434315,0.00007007918,0.000039212064,0.0000092301425,7.0674355e-7,0.000003920924,0.0024402018],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9433991,0.00026026758,0.00080034323,0.0008189964,0.053773187,0.0009481469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729264,0.001181477,0.000595634,0.0010512818,0.023416426,0.00082881463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09293093,0.00011564318,0.0002679564,0.37398958,0.00057973777,0.0020454887,0.0027160582,0.00004971306,0.0008341558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20600548,0.00008191727,0.000051606366,0.83487636,0.0019090007,0.001641258,0.00077972334,0.00010763885,0.000022066477],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018308406,0.00017237157,0.043230265,0.000008591629,0.000008386347,5.482149e-7,0.00018450552,0.000012200653,0.0025030274,0.0031687426,0.043557506,0.907152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012839868,0.00030716718,0.731415,0.000017359913,0.00002236582,0.0000137444185,0.0014244979,0.18908928,0.010680529,0.010268479,0.055089794,0.0003878149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06398231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070462334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069989375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011258727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071195592","doi":"10.1002/asi.22731","title":"The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":292,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Reputation; Relation (database); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Library science; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Law; Data mining; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33611615055197325,"score_gpt":0.5278257961980538,"score_spread":0.19170964564608056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071195592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98014146,0.00018326544,0.0007088556,0.018161317,0.00007689521,0.00019863319,0.000017379503,0.000003908663,0.00050828955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993427,0.00009278284,0.00024174864,0.00026246594,0.000033824625,0.0000054727416,2.4445166e-7,0.0000014750759,0.000019326355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965172,0.000055306326,0.0005171203,0.00007698246,0.0024803886,0.00035304093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886951,0.008901894,0.0008680713,0.00030694966,0.0011427577,0.00008524383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020167869,0.0000685912,0.00013668183,0.0034194048,0.0016275203,0.0023996534,0.0020270178,0.00003954841,0.0000010066326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03468994,0.000022579141,0.00014888158,0.062422596,0.00289168,0.002630397,0.00031235992,0.00039142612,0.0000022926945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003742659,0.000007057362,0.76647204,6.619527e-7,0.00000867579,3.3455724e-8,0.002640059,0.0000055197756,0.00004082842,0.0036369774,0.0018683699,0.22531603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012231489,0.00009531122,0.9363088,0.0000025174293,0.0000045283095,0.000026071413,0.029147087,0.0003170221,0.000013993556,0.0054227887,0.02850148,0.000038075257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008543687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014373975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22527796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008591256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020655266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071280619","doi":"10.5860/crl-356","title":"Do Open Access Electronic Theses and Dissertations Diminish Publishing Opportunities in the Social Sciences and Humanities? Findings from a 2011 Survey of Academic Publishers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Open access publishing; Library science; Electronic publishing; Higher education; Sociology; Graduate students; Polling; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Political science; Media studies; Humanities; Social science; Pedagogy; Art; World Wide Web; The Internet; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.8969688631947594,"score_gpt":0.6308111758037704,"score_spread":0.266157687390989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071280619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658186,0.0029691986,0.000006703232,0.013241724,0.00006837244,0.00089723954,0.00026994568,0.000009855689,0.01671835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697596,0.0008793996,0.00006164044,0.00025621202,0.000035747627,0.00018149352,0.000024447478,0.000011927245,0.0015731987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878942,0.0026396506,0.0007717183,0.00081498333,0.006776365,0.0011030788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9312826,0.06367069,0.0003333275,0.00065512856,0.0037532765,0.000305029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058283478,0.00017322753,0.00041913983,0.022730509,0.0022405654,0.1330722,0.012068233,0.00018189424,0.0011879412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07567547,0.00010700136,0.000041476786,0.06506219,0.003901357,0.05221401,0.006392768,0.0011365731,0.000009024815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006090716,0.00008316862,0.5992125,0.000011587563,0.000021001953,0.000004683546,0.008050855,3.7338248e-7,0.000046015135,0.1607872,0.21992731,0.011794354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025304963,0.00012571755,0.76192564,0.000015132336,0.0000018304268,0.0000010611271,0.08660931,0.0001899741,0.000057427646,0.14743349,0.0032726557,0.00011473133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024424136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028897019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21665466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005465652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022976978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072344898","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0012133","title":"A Method for the Automated, Reliable Retrieval of Publication-Citation Records","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Vocabulary; Raw data; Search engine; Data mining; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6013699902379935,"score_gpt":0.5521463994613379,"score_spread":0.04922359077665561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072344898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84180236,0.00045031653,0.11118151,0.027551016,0.0010646698,0.0025768327,0.00023106365,0.00026461456,0.014877608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5281002,0.00011182764,0.45924398,0.00025266784,0.0002123834,0.00009906086,0.00001729487,0.000020604675,0.011941983],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292505,0.00010376644,0.0006130539,0.00039568575,0.00566019,0.00030228027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675517,0.018755807,0.00045317455,0.0010644381,0.011993674,0.00018121689],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033762395,0.00007477382,0.00022250469,0.014691188,0.00023160677,0.00095575803,0.0017213402,0.00011100543,0.00065215596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15616955,0.00004401958,0.00009550845,0.10094381,0.00009512491,0.00043617308,0.00018607182,0.00023666427,0.00013301805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034739194,0.0032217545,0.053531658,0.00008861367,0.000314129,7.122999e-7,0.00053362333,0.000039408915,0.5046614,0.022593945,0.2469293,0.16773811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007595205,0.0003537918,0.058456466,0.00001461048,0.000059396305,0.0000015588033,0.0002133169,0.7632246,0.11814051,0.02421525,0.034377716,0.00018327017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008117625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021698559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025010286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019715706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073023209","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0064841","title":"Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":913,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Joint Information Systems Committee; Arts and Humanities Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Social media; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Mainstream; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6312407472470482,"score_gpt":0.49593579515051267,"score_spread":0.13530495209653548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073023209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827278,0.00087076245,0.000033359174,0.003207233,0.00007448875,0.00029091415,0.000014115742,0.00003186336,0.012749425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989341,0.00014430254,0.0016900409,0.0009997471,0.00022505617,0.000028026612,0.0000012386881,0.000017202106,0.0075533404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084,0.00013482852,0.00043282672,0.00061028654,0.007422157,0.00055990374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527764,0.0017543843,0.00016726124,0.00046387038,0.0019913958,0.000345431],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005304376,0.00014394568,0.00032715037,0.029552788,0.0002594808,0.004131986,0.0013863762,0.00014461801,0.003820022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033900964,0.000096253265,0.000069100664,0.1269345,0.00013564735,0.00063749467,0.00068867597,0.00023998303,0.0032444817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001237612,0.0008143937,0.9019836,0.000026927812,0.0000864706,0.0000036513618,0.00050634175,2.612218e-7,0.0038601276,0.00013075491,0.028154945,0.06442015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103464,0.00020308372,0.9580052,0.00004813952,0.000042061933,0.000001657739,0.0010542166,0.0038181036,0.0016786966,0.012066185,0.021436462,0.00054271176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011814196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006727959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09738172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040349878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045937097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074440227","doi":"10.1177/0961000614537514","title":"Highly cited articles in the Information Science and Library Science category in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation; Index (typography); Citation index; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.21762042173316584,"score_gpt":0.44022398578710153,"score_spread":0.2226035640539357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074440227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777956,0.00007220062,0.0042842673,0.0026587546,0.00025741334,0.00021788028,0.000005331743,0.000010737153,0.014697822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978488,0.00013897388,0.00081008085,0.0011472789,0.000042437456,0.0000040299205,8.614404e-7,0.0000022881563,0.0000052700016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97614926,0.0002352186,0.0019560985,0.00043637113,0.020311812,0.0009112244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881865,0.0023828803,0.0014587777,0.00050428027,0.0061990665,0.0006363481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13475533,0.00016921131,0.000363032,0.7385088,0.0018410799,0.028982788,0.005764049,0.00007850919,0.000021029175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069291055,0.000105485495,0.000064936976,0.9295562,0.0075080507,0.20164187,0.000983951,0.00050508586,0.000012642474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006218634,0.00006690222,0.6167582,0.000012590973,0.000004114356,0.0000017920512,0.010504383,0.00032253438,0.0013198117,0.08088075,0.00023197617,0.2898347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052740425,0.00013860743,0.9147722,0.000010200516,0.000007037128,0.000019905048,0.0045822393,0.07188814,0.0007074349,0.005960781,0.0012515157,0.00013450698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004227716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026949883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.298014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022628697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041607064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074541943","doi":"10.3129/i10-003","title":"Assessing payback from research investment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.8052335153994701,"score_gpt":0.6232428460621985,"score_spread":0.1819906693372716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074541943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25867927,0.0042799707,0.00009433489,0.60530466,0.013251401,0.00034690817,0.00029834197,0.0000036843794,0.11774143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7435966,0.000056176115,0.008074316,0.18740712,0.022116967,0.000017591121,0.00013180845,0.00020705802,0.038392335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085034,0.002617055,0.0018749039,0.00093662733,0.011470706,0.0022503785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645498,0.016596537,0.0012920403,0.0015863811,0.013495288,0.0024799556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049464855,0.00033732774,0.0010925222,0.13147886,0.0006808107,0.007758971,0.00843729,0.0032041208,0.020725071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07814402,0.00024401078,0.00045041498,0.06678417,0.0013781468,0.00085486984,0.00045397016,0.017758943,0.0010474905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000319067,0.000012326957,0.010791219,0.0000037236264,0.000046718524,0.11467825,0.00006749337,0.0000024346025,0.00003453613,0.00003132175,0.87107956,0.0032492462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022782008,0.0002792638,0.01424854,0.000036264926,0.000012981833,0.025860358,0.0001974145,0.000021000747,0.0000441031,0.03353165,0.9252922,0.00024842058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019835025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048674433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48491737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008063026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014319622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075407325","doi":"10.1590/s0102-76382009000400004","title":"Fator de impacto: importância e influência no meio editorial, acadêmico e científico","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medicine; Criticism; Scientific evidence; Scientific literature; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16840489526489644,"score_gpt":0.44037245006716036,"score_spread":0.2719675548022639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075407325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65632,0.13257396,0.010157619,0.0015003993,0.19624104,0.00077479996,0.00019407997,0.00006712536,0.002171016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92389905,0.015959682,0.00047556654,0.00056175276,0.05794411,0.0000038351923,0.0000075978905,0.00009225266,0.0010561517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593407,0.0022818858,0.0043683588,0.001249425,0.030101594,0.0026580666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96923035,0.006077886,0.0025328936,0.0025032235,0.015941996,0.003713644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13066769,0.00084827165,0.0034618618,0.06092979,0.00064683426,0.005174719,0.0047131185,0.0011025065,0.00088521774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10961603,0.00067716563,0.010400945,0.10558589,0.00036723216,0.0029634037,0.0005172212,0.0024559025,0.0007568581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037661757,0.00044357113,0.03613311,0.000040691546,0.0018811659,0.0019158265,0.00027780962,0.0005494861,0.0009981102,0.0000121827225,0.7362606,0.22111087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014570344,0.00069801154,0.1128225,0.00031277293,0.0006042229,0.0012356469,0.00044097484,0.00037801554,0.0016293331,0.00043380205,0.8789999,0.0009878102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000404904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013236017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2675791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010537556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006944967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075464897","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0859-6","title":"Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Publication; Elite; Productivity; Citation analysis; Library science; Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.26447491485703406,"score_gpt":0.4612345109392629,"score_spread":0.19675959608222882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075464897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956776,0.0006994798,0.00013463551,0.0007187071,0.0016700912,0.00045266986,0.00010116226,0.000010109165,0.0005355787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883133,0.00013830276,0.00034268596,0.00016298507,0.00003054688,0.000013478271,0.000008483442,0.000008122991,0.0004640881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98372483,0.00026619187,0.0008648708,0.0010733446,0.012976815,0.0010939189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935562,0.0018035665,0.00059426547,0.0009216093,0.0024443201,0.0006800312],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.068968765,0.00016955637,0.0002728926,0.14825515,0.0009451085,0.0040509864,0.0022124788,0.000104637824,0.000064110296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06760544,0.00011683832,0.000048373186,0.45360926,0.0026510481,0.0032238746,0.0021370817,0.0002516458,0.000028697012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000458263,0.00014713492,0.8878684,0.000007167814,0.00000163685,3.3263163e-7,0.00082012836,0.0000011938992,0.041489635,0.0006697598,0.000107689186,0.06888234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003440464,0.000037609912,0.9871478,0.000010713667,0.000003806649,0.000010180237,0.00036640657,0.0025412806,0.004473042,0.00019655743,0.004734856,0.00013367478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055574124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022160319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3053541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000433768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003471444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698293},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2076071133","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0822-6","title":"Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Harm; Impact factor; Proxy (statistics); Ecology; Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Set (abstract data type); Biology; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.37632678244284634,"score_gpt":0.5872092963679597,"score_spread":0.21088251392511337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076071133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99684346,0.0014611391,0.00005452258,0.00025869027,0.00021084548,0.0009433344,0.00006680362,0.000008086902,0.00015312916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948907,0.00019607016,0.0002028513,0.000011366642,0.000013264397,0.00003906236,0.0000057372454,0.00000680475,0.00003577737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949861,0.001026733,0.0007189172,0.0006286569,0.0019599258,0.00067965046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97907573,0.018579938,0.00026527906,0.00044273803,0.0010852754,0.00055104506],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02995713,0.00017192888,0.00037741574,0.12591848,0.0002878303,0.00069136836,0.0005148041,0.00012907131,0.000029511695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070761286,0.00009904343,0.000048032885,0.32032874,0.00031438,0.00095150684,0.00055808085,0.00026406883,0.0000060229413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019866524,0.00025101952,0.98634416,0.0000031367097,0.000012175252,0.0000052423293,0.004259727,0.000100751604,0.000070876595,0.00013920631,0.00023547235,0.008558375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077484705,0.00096299604,0.98997694,0.000002773579,0.000007714173,0.000059043035,0.0065358197,0.0009765993,0.000005217995,0.00053012045,0.00006179313,0.00010615292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004534582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012639653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19441028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028330187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017113915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076342581","doi":"10.1577/1548-8446-34.12.598","title":"Maintaining the Competitiveness of the American Fisheries Society Journals: An Assessment Based on Influence and Cost-Effectiveness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.3740745069818973,"score_gpt":0.5574868213571416,"score_spread":0.18341231437524425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076342581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893934,0.00007046515,0.0026084548,0.0054515265,0.00012949629,0.00037967623,0.00003588491,0.00001402409,0.0019170354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979165,0.00006990955,0.00063381094,0.0012578461,0.000035013458,0.000021780696,0.0000011445386,0.0000069912257,0.000056974848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936107,0.0011451893,0.0004219002,0.0004386145,0.0040059444,0.00037769682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054474,0.006703883,0.00044599044,0.0007395457,0.0014119748,0.00015387582],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425968,0.00016509865,0.00036618792,0.001820202,0.0007462682,0.0019691084,0.0016919286,0.000046398796,0.00012776823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006488129,0.000080391925,0.0001589129,0.032203678,0.0013263393,0.0006275131,0.0002717711,0.00037470312,0.0000015675308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007244321,0.00010815716,0.9078744,0.000004659817,0.000011003473,0.0000021167846,0.0003025332,0.0010301681,0.0008447998,0.00070347433,0.00028315836,0.088763095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000251831,0.0005907592,0.97980994,0.00004019306,0.0000052948953,0.0000032687785,0.0022393577,0.0069123143,0.000843551,0.0026491918,0.006543608,0.00011068781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011733774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002921911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08865241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096511234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024903592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077611838","doi":"10.3171/2009.12.jns091599","title":"Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Neurosurgery; Citation; Subspecialty; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Grading (engineering); Impact factor; MEDLINE; Observational study; Medical physics; Family medicine; Library science; Surgery; Pathology","score_opus":0.5621682540822652,"score_gpt":0.5479679351986918,"score_spread":0.014200318883573426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077611838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027653787,0.95537573,0.000009052277,0.0022679435,0.012952893,0.0007154429,0.000046039484,0.00001986154,0.00095923047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060904706,0.9910044,0.000019362975,0.0008555979,0.0011250946,0.00002385443,0.000004166629,0.00010996707,0.0007670589],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651366,0.0059026196,0.010020449,0.0014632352,0.015508596,0.0019684986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92320603,0.06380099,0.0071915276,0.002057345,0.0024035266,0.0013405752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.072357625,0.0009886575,0.005263329,0.17823304,0.0003095647,0.0074520484,0.006851423,0.00116403,0.0008302029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13148823,0.00053823245,0.0033017218,0.30442047,0.0005041032,0.0012257764,0.0010803165,0.010275123,0.000111802685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008479608,0.0004330005,0.015383296,0.00013098636,0.00002752119,0.0057791844,0.000025325206,0.00006284205,0.00003688185,0.000011323315,0.013786374,0.96423846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048926956,0.00014026371,0.02149284,0.002808328,0.00006177696,0.0021617622,0.00002302418,0.000098545,0.0000021325047,0.00013828011,0.97209233,0.0004914692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015992844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015614476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025324285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016648056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078299330","doi":"10.5596/c11-021","title":"Open access and health librarians in 2011","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Access to information; Health information; Public relations; Information access; Political science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Health care","score_opus":0.26600464241663163,"score_gpt":0.4912204744430563,"score_spread":0.22521583202642464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078299330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47772485,0.09856966,0.0010655677,0.39110044,0.0066353367,0.0017743568,0.00079806295,0.000034241326,0.022297483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94579846,0.021241158,0.0025406268,0.028218929,0.0006449722,0.000005287053,0.0000025853149,0.0000341958,0.001513802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98697555,0.00486805,0.0020614068,0.00029721993,0.00421847,0.0015793012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830063,0.0060995757,0.0058510336,0.0003345452,0.0019636652,0.0027448721],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0750308,0.0002087075,0.0007217088,0.008023716,0.0012848356,0.01533712,0.005147507,0.00034580313,0.0007261738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038214795,0.00015610486,0.00017427898,0.013913073,0.000062422805,0.005303493,0.0006454951,0.0016200913,0.0000026589614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015351721,0.000027518021,0.57379436,0.0000052160594,0.000041855317,0.000043495445,0.001138711,0.000022374012,5.757464e-7,0.00081145094,0.4204033,0.0036957897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006616172,0.00010275453,0.8077305,0.000050908908,0.000007402558,0.00022535851,0.00055312837,0.0002448758,0.000016864095,0.025982263,0.1642851,0.00013922545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7397098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83896667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4680736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027939735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0947901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98820466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079772095","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-001","title":"Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Publishing; Peer review; Technical peer review; Open peer review; Computer science; Publication; Implementation; Review article; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6022083722763935,"score_gpt":0.58024556048121,"score_spread":0.021962811795183446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079772095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009425609,0.97417283,0.000008798195,0.020681283,0.0010693562,0.0011120627,0.00009569392,0.0000028742397,0.0028476487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000015967804,0.9920339,0.0013907169,0.003424951,0.00025494973,0.000017196344,0.000012683251,0.00003174285,0.0028322807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659871,0.002737003,0.0052763303,0.0007475151,0.024658743,0.0005933407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86870646,0.011515637,0.019442579,0.0028587691,0.09625202,0.0012245434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22200143,0.00041838142,0.003776189,0.025240159,0.00034238095,0.21007971,0.019179245,0.00050336134,0.00034783612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6128046,0.0001884233,0.0013104562,0.14087096,0.00011876045,0.09038859,0.007037405,0.0062937113,0.00003288775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.01267e-7,0.000018373656,0.00015926456,0.027495304,0.00004942269,0.000010119969,0.000028114799,3.6614705e-9,7.139461e-7,0.0001414821,0.27355298,0.6985434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598256,0.000035622936,0.0001956761,0.3534061,0.00015742768,0.00043986057,0.000017770693,3.768795e-7,3.0762976e-7,0.00023268849,0.645299,0.00012915439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016523769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.898297e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69841427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020601705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018999081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080391594","doi":"10.1051/medsci/20082467641","title":"Repenser le sens de la communication scientifique : l’accès libre","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"médecine/sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5020593832902432,"score_gpt":0.5264976335133597,"score_spread":0.02443825022311641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080391594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72117174,0.023815028,0.00702103,0.0324522,0.0012022156,0.0004270062,0.000059561487,0.00009164288,0.21375959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953915,0.006288964,0.02471842,0.0007148048,0.0002161351,0.000020613297,0.0000046557598,0.000025631089,0.07261925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834054,0.0032351415,0.0011884097,0.0017081902,0.008708994,0.0017538718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794359,0.015381038,0.000519984,0.0016431493,0.0022039306,0.0008159717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07242251,0.0003730788,0.00056158385,0.025478847,0.0050672274,0.0056311083,0.006949442,0.0004356422,0.0015026402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035029948,0.00030529458,0.00029972236,0.16910149,0.011718422,0.0024645964,0.002226495,0.0008098608,0.001048635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038060127,0.0019513478,0.38997355,0.0000502253,0.000043183307,0.00031840577,0.0024032989,0.0013378133,0.004236463,0.14033605,0.26969606,0.18961555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021918141,0.00052296,0.32199928,0.00037819953,0.000028540246,0.001650632,0.002666782,0.05778348,0.010483555,0.13505153,0.4659982,0.0012450191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026746644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009362207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19630215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002549996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004192418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080449773","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504701305","title":"Scientific international collaboration of Turkey, Greece, Poland, and Portugal: A bibliometric analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portuguese; Turkish; Mainstream; Political science; Geography; Library science; European region; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Regional science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.09062337609994872,"score_gpt":0.45583174414202726,"score_spread":0.36520836804207857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080449773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950806,0.00003374445,0.000312306,0.0033347434,0.00021633171,0.0002509814,0.00006866961,0.000015972499,0.0006866417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435914,0.0000984308,0.005385037,0.00007586269,0.000009570695,0.000013646477,0.0000018109762,0.0000020271143,0.000054464985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463236,0.0000027623732,0.0006227036,0.00032509767,0.0041239527,0.00029314053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97826225,0.0003533514,0.0013513569,0.00025002958,0.019668039,0.00011500727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145690115,0.00008737287,0.00027855835,0.26046196,0.00047876503,0.0016281104,0.0020452784,0.00007255169,0.000006801008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02696322,0.00005541189,0.00013940148,0.8201872,0.005525569,0.0033417467,0.0008415265,0.00016534323,0.0000010980955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001829752,0.000041749063,0.58168507,0.000017539429,0.00007940883,1.252879e-8,0.00062341604,0.0000026987593,0.09910836,0.020204995,0.0036239675,0.2945945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008443419,0.00039706755,0.79246885,0.000009169079,0.000124521,0.000020636118,0.019292094,0.053644203,0.051446468,0.014245614,0.067199506,0.00030752353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039880837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053248846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5597252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036299087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003037832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080497488","doi":"10.1007/s11192-014-1457-6","title":"Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Interdisciplinarity; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Engineering ethics; Biology; Social science; Computer science; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4283907410291913,"score_gpt":0.5475682690263628,"score_spread":0.11917752799717152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080497488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571957,0.0013209905,0.038435597,0.0010992491,0.00049222994,0.00017256188,0.000031432206,0.000007765928,0.0012444644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991814,0.000054743516,0.00058013096,0.00001811711,0.00004251545,0.000012679625,0.0000010828247,0.00000667514,0.00010268293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478793,0.0003404771,0.0007558698,0.0005908344,0.003080929,0.0004439789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852783,0.0073299715,0.00045512215,0.0012264843,0.0022433593,0.00021720388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032988917,0.00013683637,0.00029258375,0.037022043,0.00040971756,0.00039033729,0.0022997432,0.000067540364,0.00002067387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050511062,0.00006417531,0.00014897766,0.2764794,0.0013678196,0.00029461615,0.0034563353,0.00024384457,0.000007794844],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060062295,0.00039199943,0.098682374,0.000088588284,0.000069323054,0.000045996603,0.0023178442,0.00031777166,0.096142575,0.056403916,0.0017079121,0.7437716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026945805,0.0022412941,0.29979628,0.00011907288,0.00015079488,0.0011317048,0.031596515,0.15953434,0.2225431,0.27340248,0.0055663493,0.0012234894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091476606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009920851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74254817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008286251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010668882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080526086","doi":"10.1142/s0219649213500378","title":"Impact of Funding on Scientific Output and Collaboration: A Survey of Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Productivity; Scientific literature; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Management science; Economics; Library science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.36590943039803103,"score_gpt":0.526067848828404,"score_spread":0.16015841843037293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080526086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97080284,0.00070924556,0.0027439466,0.00012970642,0.00079223904,0.00034647723,0.00004583706,0.0000027582144,0.024426972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810886,0.00012684127,0.00062729785,0.0000098687005,0.000021151407,0.0000015125014,0.0000060719703,0.0000022991928,0.0010960805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481076,0.00017994174,0.0013636344,0.00011326909,0.0033425936,0.00018981697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824568,0.00089743995,0.0013489183,0.00030211324,0.014805277,0.00018944267],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018783055,0.00009666612,0.00028737378,0.040756397,0.00010559797,0.0028611415,0.00076068495,0.000050614155,0.00016453047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070172655,0.000057965688,0.000116761315,0.072176166,0.000101352896,0.003035038,0.00026419078,0.00013572077,0.0001047284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018357155,0.000449537,0.15230326,0.00015401852,0.0002017684,0.0000027182318,0.005393361,0.000877082,0.00015885623,0.004091078,0.2521794,0.5840053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006953851,0.0006042667,0.9844044,0.00010484303,0.000007368746,0.0000042785878,0.0011435418,0.0053296075,0.00012231001,0.00071343227,0.006793251,0.00007731354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013425449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004924512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012398955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018806274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081041601","doi":"10.1126/science.1208378","title":"Improving Asia-Pacific Science Collaboration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Geography; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.4525723447399806,"score_gpt":0.5822745840511611,"score_spread":0.12970223931118047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081041601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91896665,0.0007030153,0.008865619,0.0011088658,0.0039212857,0.00032677862,0.000010911091,0.0000644314,0.06603244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387836,0.000014149299,0.003933866,0.00006685835,0.00015959398,0.000008073056,3.0365376e-7,0.000005531742,0.0019332638],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757414,0.00008314745,0.0005103484,0.0010151174,0.020971267,0.0016787227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889833,0.00094797544,0.00027421024,0.0012502838,0.007238557,0.0013056783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.093637735,0.00013479074,0.00017787889,0.06058503,0.0019939914,0.008883217,0.0059265015,0.00005167219,0.00028684858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09154362,0.000093296636,0.000052200317,0.5164568,0.0037702974,0.009890794,0.0014660226,0.00020111361,0.0014062071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072507282,0.00014670896,0.17356585,0.0000024978322,9.752207e-7,0.0000019497925,0.000817067,0.0000146030025,0.51763785,0.016417732,0.0025562567,0.28883126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000369748,0.00020211095,0.63502276,0.0000074516925,0.000004336142,0.00003132227,0.00767234,0.018630803,0.2623473,0.005100051,0.07003183,0.0005799129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025237681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035471228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46145692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004719455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023771555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081305716","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0120495","title":"Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":368,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal; Universiteit Leiden; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Altmetrics; Popularity; Social media; Citation; Mainstream; World Wide Web; Computer science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.5871440852318912,"score_gpt":0.45929722022510844,"score_spread":0.12784686500678277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081305716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99705446,0.0009250612,0.000017482065,0.0011673502,0.00008837969,0.0003120589,0.000032518852,0.000006150836,0.00039651842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950415,0.00017487688,0.00011603479,0.000025941466,0.00006900648,0.00001605268,0.0000024449582,0.000005646953,0.00008583014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907123,0.00047191355,0.0004873079,0.000254646,0.007868813,0.0002050376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296963,0.0030210859,0.00033754398,0.00028485485,0.0032403476,0.00014653699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017621713,0.00008925317,0.00034352095,0.009725591,0.00011407962,0.0015120668,0.0007570959,0.00007090177,0.000036074856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06482691,0.00004557445,0.000042549753,0.051109888,0.00015068901,0.0010627037,0.0003726747,0.00015772753,0.000010809191],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002419237,0.00043393153,0.6165305,0.00013811549,0.00016636681,0.0000023442676,0.007846233,0.0000010535949,0.30009317,0.00020103855,0.0003685413,0.07397681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015728538,0.0015193998,0.26378572,0.00009750835,0.000096397314,8.0010494e-7,0.0048632813,0.0005661472,0.7263674,0.00048716794,0.00044698792,0.0001963264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003668379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000119348515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42627424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056648365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010585528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082127471","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0003202","title":"Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; York University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Gender balance; Peer review; Demography; Representation (politics); Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5498284711305071,"score_gpt":0.5221254123846149,"score_spread":0.027703058745892295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082127471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99508226,0.0020457313,0.0005232246,0.001172487,0.000036587888,0.0005123418,0.0000013273681,0.0000015854181,0.00062442623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975582,0.00096283096,0.0009887934,0.0004260952,0.000013477906,0.00002267205,1.5282798e-7,0.0000015942278,0.000026231468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650055,0.000530345,0.0004679043,0.00021395742,0.002141441,0.00014578862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983775,0.014868997,0.00016999558,0.00023363077,0.00090668205,0.00004567374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01808588,0.00004223358,0.00023842651,0.009251253,0.000053744177,0.00012000053,0.00029138653,0.000051115338,0.000011099467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20532581,0.000025818106,0.0000099627905,0.035921518,0.000024921646,0.00033517688,0.00012792333,0.00011328288,0.000009901252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039986062,0.0007588467,0.99011815,0.001380261,0.00002740234,0.000015799755,0.0033250474,0.000012021652,0.0015429035,0.0017153459,0.0006588833,0.00040537684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002186493,0.00013680088,0.99327886,0.00026106855,0.000017305585,0.000010667981,0.0010718978,0.003003766,0.000039599156,0.0018877106,0.000021326057,0.000052359934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012718592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040236937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18723993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046444915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045333352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98457044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082264049","doi":"10.1007/s11024-011-9170-6","title":"Equity and Excellence in Research Funding","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Equity (law); Incentive; Inequality; Inequity aversion; Normality; Economics; Public economics; Distribution (mathematics); Higher education; Positive economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9765732857704374,"score_gpt":0.7217798884682964,"score_spread":0.254793397302141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082264049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86064047,0.0011398308,0.00024243239,0.00048755656,0.00015753998,0.00011434213,0.0000026111484,0.000008071489,0.13720715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349385,0.00017707638,0.0009589246,0.000041914587,0.00003294301,0.0000075576127,1.9034074e-7,0.000004643536,0.005282881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913238,0.00031965616,0.00038932246,0.0005908293,0.006572747,0.00080359954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947398,0.0032074484,0.000051895102,0.0005289532,0.001106157,0.00036577592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06383326,0.000072403825,0.00016466292,0.043397583,0.00016128234,0.000895174,0.0018469936,0.000075316195,0.00090356317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033200666,0.000050346734,0.000031764168,0.13125683,0.0002784922,0.00044045024,0.0033878493,0.00032562908,0.00039471395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019067034,0.00010659482,0.60331005,0.000005168415,0.0000017812227,0.000059030168,0.0008104398,6.0057414e-7,0.0024330185,0.0025603815,0.007274997,0.38341886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032663913,0.0001725881,0.91412437,0.000017155508,7.5147557e-7,0.000009629259,0.0011101452,0.0030422434,0.0013316196,0.06609846,0.01362487,0.00014153373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013027285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024192942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38327733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007322059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000865471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98933834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082561485","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0074","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami: The High Cost of Academic Serials in Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Great recession; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.3750347787922275,"score_gpt":0.5282241506211722,"score_spread":0.1531893718289447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082561485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97990483,0.0012612153,0.0004924053,0.015760219,0.001172023,0.00016118976,0.000012885518,0.000002844909,0.0012324005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974507,0.00024916368,0.0015032064,0.00025438878,0.00037183604,0.0000014220092,2.0563103e-7,0.00000921689,0.00015987629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834515,0.0005120505,0.001513529,0.0003585732,0.008826686,0.0004440116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269696,0.010448476,0.0015645751,0.0004947179,0.014330029,0.00046526367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10645326,0.00012241435,0.00043994802,0.031091265,0.0002079261,0.04085354,0.0038611079,0.00030059842,0.00016653824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4012491,0.000068030604,0.00010005054,0.055544402,0.000247679,0.047999702,0.0008858922,0.0048159035,0.000005465467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014310158,0.00013171387,0.8082104,0.0000073019646,0.000048494683,0.000045758003,0.0027685803,0.00008713938,0.092630625,0.018514443,0.0096897045,0.06772274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001126529,0.0001706464,0.93134207,0.00005325684,0.000014157139,0.00013594823,0.008344287,0.0005488373,0.0014849656,0.049921244,0.006720311,0.00013772264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030449135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007845053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29479584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015623597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051360216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082791602","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2002.tb00615.x","title":"Gender Differences in Publication among University Professors in Canada*","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.5747974895297615,"score_gpt":0.43107265222052765,"score_spread":0.14372483730923385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082791602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8113548,0.14740421,0.0000067217493,0.034231357,0.0010289678,0.0007531243,0.0005248936,0.0000062026766,0.004689693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021957,0.09247367,0.000088680914,0.0018990249,0.00006065785,0.000021585296,0.000034882527,0.000015397862,0.0032103786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166244,0.0023778079,0.0013433672,0.0010679865,0.0006225877,0.0029258118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910309,0.0036927056,0.0006530199,0.00084366335,0.0017164208,0.002063324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015004399,0.00035778605,0.0013009332,0.014562455,0.00024577894,0.000066307206,0.0031364502,0.00077147427,0.0037080767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034434438,0.00036509248,0.00023658715,0.03610194,0.0019037343,0.00043229735,0.0002407222,0.001397817,0.00007305933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018592109,0.000038712435,0.9347645,0.00089109904,0.000028406806,0.00032120312,0.0024507826,0.000008855567,0.0000017367106,0.0046746978,0.03096123,0.025856894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032097922,0.000060307524,0.9581369,0.0011755604,0.000022586944,0.000010313921,0.016288133,0.0017670363,6.5045293e-7,0.0024020786,0.019438718,0.0003767426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99948883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09084088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021894973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01581149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083278517","doi":"10.1108/02641610610686012","title":"Document supply and open access: an international survey on grey literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Originality; Library science; Value (mathematics); Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37047102739059584,"score_gpt":0.5833922385005443,"score_spread":0.2129212111099485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083278517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769985,0.0004905112,0.00043538795,0.0037858414,0.0021934982,0.00081173563,0.00057138747,0.000057572488,0.014655578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865047,0.00037683122,0.00090676005,0.0004932684,0.00026714563,0.000054772012,0.00039119564,0.000029363884,0.010976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98949385,0.00062664115,0.0010971818,0.0016055198,0.0063524777,0.00082433963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380463,0.0024608143,0.00039174993,0.0010627101,0.0017788239,0.0005012789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015744556,0.00037661425,0.0004867938,0.02550777,0.00036579472,0.06581327,0.009585465,0.00015859133,0.0041868896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004293018,0.0002726008,0.0001357536,0.030665483,0.00015481647,0.010639034,0.004697025,0.00048398194,0.00034387587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002522984,0.00030089705,0.78994966,0.0000047660938,0.00004452168,0.00007942731,0.00023583173,0.00003651357,0.0002565848,0.007861919,0.117338024,0.083639584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010795642,0.00050501403,0.841276,0.00009942355,0.0000061025853,0.000022016733,0.00011100639,0.00019451062,0.0014576934,0.02522945,0.1296383,0.0003809131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005830094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094807916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08325867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038786355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112306814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084394153","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.002","title":"On the citation lifecycle of papers with delayed recognition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Period (music); History; Computer science; Library science; Art","score_opus":0.4451528031489057,"score_gpt":0.4940995388492365,"score_spread":0.04894673570033081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084394153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951852,0.00006615481,0.015718821,0.0008022254,0.0003861642,0.00011038734,0.000008188403,0.0000031403035,0.031052882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973194,0.00013076689,0.0019708334,0.00034652572,0.00007492804,8.901943e-7,8.454812e-7,0.0000051483803,0.00015068268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906089,0.00015404541,0.00095786306,0.00011451167,0.007947132,0.00021758441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97220755,0.018820189,0.0015762856,0.00032728445,0.0068628723,0.00020584333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02585763,0.00008693258,0.00024140731,0.04640892,0.00011767154,0.00050835125,0.0010541314,0.0000682532,0.0002500326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13636468,0.000038466806,0.00014463886,0.13701229,0.00009807595,0.00056153967,0.000065469736,0.0003060749,0.00006279257],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040489365,0.00017182385,0.015962537,0.00000778089,0.00006161419,0.0000039011998,0.0002589644,0.00093393505,0.00034839878,0.0037765827,0.017725358,0.9603442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007815254,0.030693645,0.6575505,0.00028557726,0.00014818774,0.00026101398,0.0068695913,0.026439797,0.018345818,0.14299807,0.10764584,0.0009466815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007660648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002820761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95939755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006553471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016329857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9643992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084570353","doi":"10.1093/biosci/bit007","title":"Scientific Publications: Moving beyond Quality and Quantity toward Influence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioScience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7292506735952365,"score_gpt":0.6036133815590274,"score_spread":0.1256372920362091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084570353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871347,0.00042895935,0.0031712584,0.0056379302,0.0004938081,0.0003285065,0.000018789486,0.000053599477,0.0027324257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939625,0.00004864249,0.0032685825,0.00038988292,0.000022177785,0.00002800504,0.0000011649216,0.000004245992,0.0022747628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891792,0.00023152285,0.0007444022,0.001332063,0.007797471,0.0007153568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98795664,0.003005094,0.00037187288,0.0014825661,0.0063409163,0.000842929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028288964,0.00014086725,0.00022570809,0.021838777,0.0010623549,0.01840839,0.0034477254,0.00008494325,0.0004951078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09760339,0.00009832385,0.00006711793,0.1542301,0.0017946766,0.0047916817,0.0014241241,0.00019106286,0.0011252913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019893298,0.000117826254,0.8019616,0.000009054166,0.000002272769,7.7094893e-7,0.00024881898,0.000008998899,0.06921934,0.031013193,0.009574063,0.08784208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089132336,0.000031883654,0.96634,0.0000033682475,8.3359276e-7,0.0000034376694,0.00027716975,0.0029625006,0.0013800687,0.021521248,0.00723114,0.00015919861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000797047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003524453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16437843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007515729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036131125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084571473","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20109.x","title":"Good news for the people who love bad news: an analysis of the funding of the top 1% most highly cited ecologists","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Incentive; Citation; Political science; Impact factor; Visibility; Subject (documents); Public relations; Economics; Geography; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3780672626437092,"score_gpt":0.5150965363020076,"score_spread":0.13702927365829837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084571473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98914146,0.00043405613,0.0024917058,0.003544433,0.00078122754,0.00056186225,0.00017969306,0.0000055312867,0.0028600148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959008,0.000052148895,0.00014621121,0.0002326422,0.000085707776,0.000011031376,0.00000274238,0.0000076011097,0.0035611023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940101,0.000361805,0.0006328446,0.00036673355,0.004061377,0.0005671715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98706454,0.009030386,0.00057594123,0.0017105963,0.0014331351,0.00018540297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011130449,0.0001285611,0.00042126255,0.011571377,0.00031046747,0.0005307755,0.003887462,0.0001078827,0.0006029293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02298504,0.000049963935,0.00046818104,0.21157865,0.0002320504,0.0004011911,0.00085883,0.0001700032,0.000021911113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014824864,0.00013199128,0.9739835,0.0000032450282,0.000120655895,5.0714053e-8,0.0007239255,0.00038870977,0.00061248854,0.0015212375,0.006013742,0.01648558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022611971,0.00006392861,0.97068083,0.000003475173,0.00014382829,2.971586e-7,0.002214608,0.012145066,0.0014851296,0.00042259175,0.012534148,0.00007995917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014133599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021701464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20000727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008310801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013946246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085482817","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2012.212","title":"Identifying Breakthroughs: Using Topic Modeling to Distinguish the Cognitive from the Economic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Proxy (statistics); Economics; Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6792139116975349,"score_gpt":0.570427133955346,"score_spread":0.10878677774218881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085482817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779465,0.0006840164,0.009165077,0.0028834061,0.00038128896,0.00057902356,0.000017172835,0.000018982522,0.008324507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636525,0.00012491636,0.0015367514,0.001005771,0.0004621264,0.00002109124,7.570774e-7,0.000012588555,0.00047074136],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951352,0.00004392506,0.00067445793,0.000516536,0.0030032278,0.00062665215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973097,0.0016353964,0.00032255077,0.00017346039,0.00036783118,0.00019105167],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056215,0.00015530581,0.0002327783,0.004048977,0.0004914722,0.0013402223,0.0027109545,0.00007445399,0.00017394015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040906137,0.00008632017,0.00012027182,0.01893865,0.0001232167,0.001084923,0.002052751,0.00029314557,0.00020203087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116136966,0.00018583042,0.42061716,0.000081701044,0.0005340503,0.0000016886524,0.013419621,0.0013668262,0.00088002515,0.07503773,0.048970904,0.43878832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015661634,0.000095457646,0.54227114,0.00044570278,0.00040429775,0.000010180612,0.068990655,0.21434294,0.003464552,0.09035952,0.07695409,0.0010953356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002719406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001679595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.437693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014438847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001634037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086149705","doi":"10.3390/publications1010016","title":"Types of Open Access Publishers in Scopus","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scopus; Library science; Political science; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); The arts; Open access publishing; Publication; Scholarly communication; History; Law; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.8429619023098723,"score_gpt":0.6921808320267508,"score_spread":0.1507810702831215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086149705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46077088,0.00028576958,0.0015736993,0.048357893,0.00030299267,0.0011344862,0.000026465872,0.000026652808,0.48752117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904622,0.000019088553,0.0010676659,0.00016369447,0.0000136977915,0.00015701812,0.0000072913986,0.000004600212,0.0081047835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960157,0.000111154346,0.00054843375,0.00039127792,0.002636743,0.00029664324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920796,0.001900005,0.00022921692,0.0010106469,0.004526954,0.00025353392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583903,0.00005783534,0.0001719314,0.0483946,0.000081653496,0.026743952,0.010571737,0.000050636245,0.007666127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04523599,0.00004117437,0.00004120554,0.25139862,0.00010453133,0.013527082,0.0028020393,0.00011992267,0.00065548555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010777895,0.00016406606,0.55541897,0.0000014187277,0.000003934706,8.481597e-8,0.00004208039,0.000021508919,0.00012785339,0.012244703,0.33431682,0.09765752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014702068,0.0000114982195,0.90219355,0.000002053246,6.6107293e-7,3.8137927e-7,0.0001324538,0.0014726092,0.00015895537,0.030202815,0.06562059,0.00005739306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027342713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016139378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5296913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053594787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003390789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087529277","doi":"10.1126/science.323.5910.36a","title":"Literature Citations in the Internet Era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.520434424539065,"score_gpt":0.579042658373102,"score_spread":0.058608233834037016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087529277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005892865,0.0017147404,0.00038076064,0.9558812,0.0013960515,0.00042359714,0.00005464791,0.000019703255,0.03423643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098905005,0.00016581219,0.0011665118,0.87586105,0.0013111812,0.00003093761,0.00003092365,0.0000126078585,0.02251595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97523457,0.0004357128,0.0006729755,0.0013349158,0.021284709,0.001037126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980105,0.005218633,0.00025729285,0.0016529484,0.0029247848,0.00014530818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04234103,0.00021887,0.00028998678,0.10529541,0.0003347933,0.016994283,0.015412159,0.00034649615,0.00025638987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044780966,0.00011113759,0.00015401804,0.4669892,0.0009870568,0.0011986222,0.00060864066,0.0031586837,0.0007298214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.695108e-7,0.00002045142,0.00079761667,0.0000019487936,7.041054e-7,0.00019036268,0.000674332,0.000003177604,0.000020202835,0.0003359556,0.96948814,0.028466264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007782949,0.00007245152,0.04888651,0.000033333465,0.0000014493423,0.00003047026,0.00011226865,0.00064413284,0.000017403354,0.025570422,0.9243841,0.00016960652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003186968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017935807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36169377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017638097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007516403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088858100","doi":"10.1515/itit-2014-1048","title":"Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"it - Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Microblogging; Social media; Citation; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web; Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Data science; Data mining","score_opus":0.36573883847070077,"score_gpt":0.4990475180976115,"score_spread":0.13330867962691073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088858100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48215503,0.00048785718,0.29135382,0.14933118,0.0036566074,0.00123922,0.0002312799,0.0012401314,0.07030489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696213,0.00011788774,0.0017811526,0.00069974136,0.00012611768,0.00003310718,0.000025084715,0.00001061153,0.00024417636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908238,0.0001793693,0.0009830272,0.0004395197,0.0067224894,0.00085181557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914044,0.0038015414,0.0006614548,0.0009433558,0.002941094,0.00024816307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012706421,0.00023563478,0.00048765808,0.10589984,0.00036994967,0.0026289518,0.0034166884,0.0005233515,0.0004005412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093120374,0.0001707421,0.00015302886,0.16736615,0.0004514356,0.00258036,0.0009446944,0.00062095793,0.0018939866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018539899,0.000049423863,0.004147953,0.000007806936,0.000018473524,0.0000018144528,0.001873569,0.0000070885603,0.00008324618,0.04040992,0.108302146,0.84508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017060277,0.00025630614,0.008644419,0.000008825069,0.000013256805,0.000022855864,0.009605545,0.010904205,0.0036244064,0.10429955,0.86043775,0.00047686783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001265568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001508849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8446032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019871164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012372498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089139733","doi":"10.3354/esep00090","title":"Re-interpretation of influence weight as a citation-based Index of New Knowledge (INK)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Impact factor; Index (typography); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.37579894210087184,"score_gpt":0.52889130908522,"score_spread":0.15309236698434814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089139733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99379236,0.0002905925,0.0016462008,0.0005425738,0.000115794195,0.00012263426,0.000017262413,0.0000034195393,0.0034691652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983404,0.0002559485,0.0007393818,0.00028424445,0.0000150135975,0.000002127037,0.0000014114486,0.0000045735105,0.00035687606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917346,0.00013879202,0.0006981817,0.0004633453,0.0065771574,0.00038791483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414146,0.004281103,0.00025695475,0.00043549374,0.0005514476,0.0003335122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012441219,0.00010751363,0.00022472921,0.013651655,0.00024747138,0.00012483005,0.0011690462,0.00014122656,0.00007652539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030295152,0.00008806184,0.00004793443,0.031959005,0.0036327557,0.00065772625,0.00035479994,0.00040517468,0.000028595943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029622857,0.00030221985,0.9543119,0.00002649137,0.0000037613058,0.00000766699,0.017399982,0.002131491,0.007991646,0.0060576596,0.0002585771,0.011478994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068146514,0.000327612,0.8536284,0.000057615576,0.0000035789974,0.0000062774807,0.0045492467,0.07069174,0.025358746,0.043794896,0.00069655693,0.000203851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049721193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004325603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10068347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019658245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001460225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089560665","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0003","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Psychology; Scientific literature; Population; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.8410412911769377,"score_gpt":0.5958931120667178,"score_spread":0.2451481791102199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089560665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7660072,0.098097004,0.0045264866,0.119699776,0.0040704496,0.0007858593,0.000024204208,0.00001311972,0.0067759226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300194,0.0016784576,0.0017534478,0.00069657795,0.00026098406,0.000010974113,5.502991e-7,0.00001469458,0.0025823894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703838,0.0005340309,0.0025103772,0.0004439707,0.02529806,0.00082975155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87528545,0.010432526,0.003492553,0.0011914548,0.10838553,0.0012125182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34913608,0.00013607599,0.00043845698,0.033385433,0.00091967866,0.18415508,0.007937227,0.00012731536,0.00019936924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61063856,0.00006998172,0.0003379329,0.116924934,0.0002147634,0.08281742,0.00039869756,0.00173954,0.000022668499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011593752,0.00030487776,0.23870221,0.000064079635,0.00003846288,0.000047914727,0.0018694242,0.0000127665,0.00066617655,0.001371544,0.28726864,0.469538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018479186,0.00045817532,0.29586112,0.0010489869,0.000038260278,0.000259633,0.0062898146,0.0006675558,0.0015623254,0.24656138,0.4450629,0.0003419168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017983677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043910008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46919608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014732296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006885723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089604928","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157","title":"Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":830,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Confidence interval; Confounding; Logistic regression; Bibliometrics; Demography; Relative risk; Medicine; Library science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.8228296145688352,"score_gpt":0.6782495007557224,"score_spread":0.14458011381311275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089604928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719009,0.00023028019,0.0024047925,0.0007125792,0.00012742942,0.00018590622,0.00003504997,0.000008833369,0.024394272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979089,0.00003073005,0.0010164877,0.000071000584,0.00003615185,0.000009297176,0.000008802029,0.0000034312754,0.00091522816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736583,0.00020174704,0.0004799179,0.00037220874,0.0013105917,0.00026969553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955386,0.0025722485,0.00021523407,0.00038493404,0.0012135918,0.00007542661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005320362,0.00005997757,0.00021213524,0.018342903,0.00007046133,0.0012723907,0.004139481,0.00006357184,0.0008634469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011645168,0.000038757913,0.0000450999,0.06915698,0.00015781427,0.00084423344,0.0018039487,0.00006698946,0.00017387672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027445583,0.00026121395,0.79003674,0.000002799147,0.000007942241,0.0000023330088,0.000020416688,0.0000123044,0.10768279,0.020123001,0.00629066,0.07553233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051148405,0.00021761448,0.5456262,0.0000039986908,0.0000045457377,0.0000016012555,0.00014471464,0.0021953105,0.110162824,0.32641515,0.014589155,0.00012734563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004237825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070332564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30629215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020124455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006447459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089724844","doi":"10.1353/ils.2011.0009","title":"Comparative Analysis between Impact Factor and h-Index for Psychiatry Journals / Analyse comparative du facteur d'impact et de l'indice h dans les revues de psychiatrie","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Index (typography); Web of science; Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Political science; Computer science; Internal medicine; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3804788891576659,"score_gpt":0.5174789162242389,"score_spread":0.137000027066573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089724844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415998,0.0048730713,0.046603326,0.002304058,0.0003486577,0.00025014297,0.0012599686,0.000005198143,0.0027558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912984,0.0009826684,0.00923787,0.00038196574,0.00013746237,0.0000014720413,0.000011245372,0.0000053964595,0.00011207986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494797,0.00045323477,0.0014753285,0.0002968726,0.0018276401,0.0009989692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057245,0.0013189687,0.0016319829,0.0002661962,0.0019112277,0.0042991904],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011252578,0.0003012265,0.0008297387,0.0539189,0.0011510302,0.0069008754,0.0018760011,0.00018372519,0.0010337632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020673212,0.00021539393,0.00045562975,0.067107335,0.0013101569,0.018788958,0.000117769785,0.0006216661,0.000008673108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006427265,0.000026080512,0.95622206,0.000013678219,0.0003035304,0.0000045457687,0.027354062,0.00048526484,0.0000097787515,0.0005612086,0.0036605385,0.011294995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005435866,0.0007079029,0.9618942,0.000059635564,0.00015291548,0.00012252903,0.011927049,0.018242177,0.000093592076,0.002034782,0.003975644,0.00024595388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008655943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036973972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047530062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004085113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017122416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089745446","doi":"10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013","title":"The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":420,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Publication; Citation; Impact factor; Citation impact; Political science; Business; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.7282197861646095,"score_gpt":0.6839351451472796,"score_spread":0.04428464101732987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089745446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0896349,0.61992157,0.00041891812,0.24853067,0.0007502467,0.012461535,0.00009094718,0.000035574587,0.028155636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18772541,0.7988781,0.0005417568,0.008620395,0.00024651093,0.00039534894,0.0000028863185,0.000028445533,0.003561147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941688,0.00074448134,0.00085998327,0.0006476533,0.0030827129,0.0004963434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931723,0.003879614,0.0003554727,0.0010954409,0.0010473693,0.00044980925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046118498,0.00017627008,0.0006809591,0.003239045,0.00051900634,0.028094174,0.009788159,0.000048727827,0.00025544662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027329631,0.0000633821,0.000110743684,0.07354566,0.00028255788,0.0020479287,0.009082433,0.00015083549,0.00013090977],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075503216,0.000025221063,0.0022257394,0.000109236214,0.000028715185,0.0000032463772,0.00007468562,0.000008551585,0.00004131001,0.004387275,0.04804693,0.9449736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018068206,0.00020901374,0.054252822,0.0007520971,0.000042287997,0.000035284636,0.000040532097,0.000026520143,0.00012186871,0.1791802,0.76321554,0.00031698003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024808692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032990173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055525532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029262397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090887210","doi":"10.3138/ptc.57.4.251","title":"Peering into Peer Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiotherapy Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Computer science; Peer review; World Wide Web; The Internet; Biology","score_opus":0.3929032140128865,"score_gpt":0.5880770106911629,"score_spread":0.1951737966782764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090887210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24355063,0.15557785,0.004722338,0.49778932,0.003203997,0.001416249,0.000101970465,0.00014509523,0.09349255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112561,0.007227216,0.0020174615,0.018365955,0.0005420979,0.000022499178,0.000006609434,0.000029327151,0.060532738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848271,0.000082835155,0.0004368755,0.00045765418,0.013766515,0.00042901543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949748,0.00082329166,0.00012203025,0.0007190801,0.00300598,0.00035483955],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068911156,0.0001269472,0.0002779417,0.0062098885,0.00017737543,0.000540118,0.0017314118,0.000028409648,0.0035706442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055290586,0.00008809115,0.00009384729,0.06568243,0.000037671092,0.00033811652,0.00014660407,0.00015566718,0.00021276694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002050638,0.000015993899,0.000690489,0.000013302663,0.000005963488,0.000002602121,0.000021447171,0.000033031843,0.0009026087,0.00012207188,0.6316685,0.36652192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001271264,0.000017568294,0.0039226534,0.000028244503,0.0000011141896,0.0000015901255,0.000024953766,0.0015346636,0.00081317895,0.0005780704,0.99282014,0.0001306942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30361915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3208501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004032115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009158106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090906929","doi":"10.1097/01.ede.0000100282.03466.2c","title":"Interpreting Authorship Order and Corresponding Authorship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Accountability; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8021091696779195,"score_gpt":0.634156637234322,"score_spread":0.16795253244359742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090906929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086350655,0.003798542,0.023252876,0.9519652,0.0046678316,0.00044706828,0.000074634176,0.00010832253,0.00705046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047372583,0.00032535783,0.011284739,0.902724,0.004150592,0.00006003433,0.000111093745,0.000114553775,0.03385702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769726,0.009345828,0.002954915,0.0030674723,0.004871963,0.002787241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8330844,0.1603844,0.0016115407,0.0018162047,0.002274579,0.00082884874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14257011,0.00059285597,0.0019239531,0.07114537,0.00045799796,0.0011003194,0.0040454003,0.0032326542,0.0015945502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66829133,0.00042062142,0.00036538087,0.08344028,0.0008946984,0.00034231442,0.00209971,0.0067343395,0.001184725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024286437,0.000011811775,0.03324875,0.000026360663,0.0000305395,0.00025358723,0.00021674269,0.000022859784,0.000009164149,0.0022721798,0.9390184,0.024865268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020010413,0.00015384083,0.0072467993,0.00007569903,0.000014102094,0.0001185169,0.000042170675,0.0015521083,0.000006154084,0.27429903,0.7158697,0.00042178473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027018136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015041933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52572125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000381421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005443651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090960911","doi":"10.3152/095820210x492495","title":"Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9310062741247978,"score_gpt":0.7398197713321439,"score_spread":0.1911865027926538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090960911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93226904,0.00021742264,0.00021727904,0.039126877,0.00039734074,0.0016017536,0.00004117568,0.000015729473,0.026113413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744844,0.000069896916,0.0002783833,0.000025784844,0.000116332136,0.00024580472,0.000034445435,0.000009335355,0.001771596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9422621,0.0059069796,0.0009780321,0.0012535495,0.048438225,0.0011610787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8053127,0.071029775,0.0003242964,0.0029536593,0.119701736,0.0006778389],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3787386,0.000099321485,0.0001594555,0.038906608,0.0026283404,0.006547365,0.0021530583,0.00014845052,0.001876795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48540914,0.00006166334,0.000054751967,0.23699751,0.0021143337,0.0009025843,0.0005463376,0.0014405551,0.000449815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052261053,0.00055435323,0.052162718,0.000015776837,0.00002269403,3.1813167e-7,0.0016435173,0.000084688574,0.1486854,0.49824652,0.15359618,0.14493558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898558,0.00037971154,0.5472916,0.00002646997,0.0000068312456,0.0000028312909,0.0030066273,0.14016834,0.010703401,0.25717947,0.04049361,0.00015125159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009542593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004928461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49512887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015567149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001654821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990356},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2091227949","doi":"10.5539/cis.v3n2p19","title":"A Bibliometric Assessment of Canadian Software Engineering Scholars and Institutions (1996-2006)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; York University; Universities Space Research Association; St Mary's University; Concordia University; Acadia University; McMaster University; University of Windsor; University of Regina; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Victoria University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Computer science; Institution; Event (particle physics); Field (mathematics); Impact factor; Library science; Software; Bibliometrics; Political science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.2499999798335201,"score_gpt":0.4837381573303529,"score_spread":0.23373817749683282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091227949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90005416,0.000058688544,0.09608903,0.00021338552,0.0007384722,0.00013769508,0.000037875445,0.000016247837,0.0026544663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435876,0.00011092741,0.056110956,0.00015580322,0.00002065118,0.0000028041727,0.000001935974,0.0000013506744,0.000007970197],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577564,0.000014494673,0.00047056226,0.00024205146,0.0031515989,0.00034562603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957876,0.00060186017,0.00013516791,0.00033980096,0.0024573882,0.000678163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01088037,0.00008279032,0.00014049241,0.5534322,0.00046349573,0.0036540471,0.001044498,0.000056593326,0.00003056042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426775,0.00006243206,0.000025757881,0.64343727,0.00043861693,0.010061233,0.000504298,0.00025628798,0.00001601818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7821786e-7,0.000018384158,0.43048105,0.000014655213,0.000003412193,0.0000010691949,0.00024415035,0.00051869976,0.00086216937,0.029764652,0.0008300635,0.53726083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012361362,0.000037532704,0.86150014,0.000004540127,8.8668435e-7,0.000016549508,0.00002302697,0.096061684,0.000119055774,0.00008339212,0.041954026,0.00007557822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018597206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032282356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53718525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004278127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010338788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092739591","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2009.12.001","title":"Combining commercial citation indexes and open-access bibliographic databases to delimit highly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Citation; Scientometrics; Scopus; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Data science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; Citation database; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7928641188145871,"score_gpt":0.6879661796861452,"score_spread":0.10489793912844192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092739591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036646,0.00015210477,0.091467895,0.0024353494,0.00088694255,0.00043593667,0.00007825988,0.0000052539845,0.0008736557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831178,0.00034456886,0.015981695,0.0002786119,0.00015281807,0.000016221657,0.000017284887,0.000009859153,0.00008111616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99010926,0.00020628335,0.0016145251,0.00038700708,0.007141712,0.0005411944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96002716,0.021608217,0.0009846956,0.0005705445,0.016105654,0.0007037154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05869103,0.00015279908,0.0005735782,0.48406318,0.000734689,0.011320538,0.0048370166,0.00015494044,0.000077305165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10494123,0.00010940261,0.00025612794,0.59861636,0.00018346072,0.006110222,0.00438198,0.0009325778,0.000007934746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004482073,0.00022502754,0.59348595,0.000020180149,0.00020528183,0.000009253269,0.0008784445,0.00032440643,0.000417366,0.0022819794,0.059336856,0.34236702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001301745,0.0015994317,0.9647441,0.00002703627,0.00009713349,0.000017153068,0.0021413828,0.005401949,0.0005542421,0.012551223,0.011320458,0.00024416635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017384371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066864456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3712581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060177947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034348725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092782190","doi":"10.1109/iceeli.2012.6360656","title":"Scientists' collaboration in the social sciences field: Investigating the determinants of scholarly collaboration in the Canadian context 2001–2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Education and e-Learning Innovations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Context (archaeology); Productivity; Regional science; Subject (documents); European union; Human capital; Knowledge production; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social capital; Knowledge management; Scientometrics; Technology transfer; Citation; Social science; Economic growth; Business; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Geography; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.4716494517758263,"score_gpt":0.5790737991872292,"score_spread":0.10742434741140294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092782190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212118,0.00006969938,0.000050968712,0.05705075,0.00064514106,0.0002898995,0.000013271112,0.0000033206793,0.020665158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581933,0.00001685237,0.00017178846,0.0034439112,0.00011516611,0.00005793525,0.000015578618,0.0000028419568,0.0003565736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548244,0.00074830337,0.0005707207,0.0002483527,0.002657631,0.0002925722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329585,0.0022996827,0.00040291337,0.00019695809,0.0037392704,0.00006530136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021267444,0.000090364534,0.0001074657,0.008672407,0.0014788116,0.004654164,0.0013842648,0.000079943406,0.00014353672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030756708,0.000051598883,0.000020487261,0.048805084,0.00037040142,0.0016599569,0.00006494262,0.0005303556,0.000020359374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041867697,0.0001146712,0.63285077,0.0000015400356,0.0000024252174,1.8940185e-7,0.012252131,0.000025170122,0.000100712496,0.32255498,0.007943425,0.024149818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018984881,0.00009953104,0.83652985,0.0000330438,0.0000028478762,0.000005418791,0.11755711,0.0059198025,0.000067415756,0.0069134934,0.032576755,0.00010490501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009647924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064699076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3156415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014048602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023020394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092866295","doi":"10.1126/science.1192830","title":"Japanese Science in a Global World","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Investment (military); Government (linguistics); Debt; Politics; Political science; Sign (mathematics); Science policy; Economic growth; Economics; Development economics; Finance; History; Public administration","score_opus":0.31786677907372884,"score_gpt":0.6004036584251579,"score_spread":0.282536879351429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092866295","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03881507,0.0003295079,0.000020035639,0.0003285947,0.90617496,0.00038609898,0.0001679879,0.00004463222,0.053733114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.356453,0.00021062639,0.0028548138,0.00020017888,0.60277456,0.000076214325,0.0000128709935,0.000048663172,0.03736907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91400236,0.00015576766,0.001356336,0.00395603,0.07774083,0.0027886447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95820874,0.011285113,0.00096907216,0.0050246194,0.021980025,0.0025324041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14966911,0.0004544057,0.00078104704,0.18837056,0.0012253389,0.017715447,0.03394977,0.0005635257,0.00065121293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4370006,0.0003244305,0.00019236606,0.74873996,0.0120755425,0.0035103876,0.0068673417,0.0027023628,0.0017287558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000184058,0.00015279307,0.007473294,0.0000067202395,0.0000010895553,0.0000617737,0.00017655102,0.0000104900055,0.0014875431,0.00031627307,0.9464412,0.04385389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034252362,0.00008337544,0.02519813,0.00003352823,0.0000025465695,0.000004626363,0.00017365428,0.0009969888,0.00020093452,0.005681907,0.9667753,0.0005064646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000795577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00286513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018614727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018142916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093294860","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0010","title":"Will Peer Review Still Function and How?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Computer science; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.45391483462302057,"score_gpt":0.5089795111947684,"score_spread":0.055064676571747795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093294860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58936006,0.029926468,0.0062317927,0.36102864,0.005395697,0.00021805178,0.000016474172,0.000017728933,0.0078050965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837782,0.0030305088,0.003696824,0.0024977082,0.0008684949,0.0000011705467,0.0000013850026,0.000013057802,0.0061126603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976716,0.00027636424,0.0008281247,0.00036283725,0.021431295,0.00038538783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92975116,0.0035818033,0.0015111717,0.0006883927,0.063331105,0.001136343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14968051,0.00012164218,0.0003809038,0.029226052,0.0002178535,0.17163287,0.002682065,0.00020692775,0.00046389407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5693828,0.00007455972,0.00017738655,0.062357523,0.00009413415,0.18132983,0.0005777543,0.003369855,0.000021719354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804567,0.000054088225,0.12287838,0.00002573506,0.000022982129,0.000022726339,0.000049302354,6.041214e-7,0.004511091,0.0021962014,0.5482391,0.32198173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037460975,0.00015276572,0.1637974,0.00008896716,0.000018105353,0.00019735511,0.00015298018,0.00005554605,0.000032661796,0.013188847,0.8218424,0.0000983952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010745088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071182576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41970226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051373776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029471228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093566717","doi":"10.3163/1536-5050.103.1.010","title":"Into the gray: a modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Gray (unit); Citation; Information retrieval; Data science; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6302172774255392,"score_gpt":0.583660032386797,"score_spread":0.046557245038742257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093566717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74966776,0.00018832326,0.027308712,0.21408892,0.0007140872,0.0003369646,0.00001358709,0.000008773129,0.0076728933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920156,0.00002151603,0.0013340836,0.002725591,0.00048085928,0.000004707658,0.0000021607868,0.0000093458875,0.0034061135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631272,0.0030154127,0.0009994006,0.00029716658,0.03206186,0.0004989923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982666,0.0105882855,0.0006973409,0.00060971023,0.0037697612,0.0016689078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.105182365,0.00011137134,0.00039296123,0.027981184,0.0003727406,0.0029022617,0.004137531,0.00017699825,0.00022972804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18858373,0.000046000976,0.0004765926,0.2183856,0.000094205156,0.001086068,0.0010137786,0.0009809359,0.000089166024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016194161,0.00022984997,0.20223299,0.0000015670886,0.00048681884,0.000007631123,0.0054718256,0.0041449447,0.000025465077,0.0009054181,0.7681853,0.018146241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018080993,0.0009031492,0.7202528,0.000032124546,0.00017365026,0.00001602303,0.009996706,0.044896863,0.00017868498,0.1499992,0.07142688,0.00031579513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057464484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009886589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69675845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007689582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001176594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981328},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2094558251","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.11125","title":"Scientific publications in urology and nephrology journals from China: A 10 year analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Impact factor; China; Nephrology; Citation; Web of science; Mainland; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Science Citation Index; Internal medicine; Political science; Library science; Geography; Meta-analysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.29743434832804894,"score_gpt":0.46960026660590676,"score_spread":0.17216591827785782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094558251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585712,0.0021994798,0.0006767776,0.03579691,0.0005120463,0.00008662842,0.00010519191,0.000008392462,0.002043359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971135,0.00015683542,0.0003046447,0.00081077183,0.00028590238,0.0000049565942,0.000021151736,0.0000047403405,0.0012974468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936883,0.001096492,0.0008076223,0.00044867414,0.0028017138,0.0011572177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99208623,0.003067987,0.00055929885,0.00031168867,0.0020168857,0.0019578857],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034241736,0.00012731356,0.00041248868,0.058254555,0.0006854093,0.0043748585,0.0011016268,0.0003694956,0.008965237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06226695,0.000090223366,0.00019058367,0.10616892,0.00015571824,0.0010066042,0.00016134583,0.00084999634,0.00033608102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064785745,0.00004537508,0.9745795,7.888905e-8,0.0000725228,0.0000061656074,0.00015470023,0.000045293993,0.000027484217,0.00043274177,0.0200952,0.0045344215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023418857,0.000039591476,0.867295,3.5089715e-7,0.00003551744,0.00001712562,0.00007240002,0.0010595201,9.3258467e-7,0.0089084385,0.12225376,0.000083161365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013729312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004173193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10728452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060985767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045250106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095126174","doi":"10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1","title":"100 Most Cited Articles in Orthopaedic Surgery","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Subspecialty; Medicine; Citation; Specialty; Subject (documents); Science Citation Index; Ranking (information retrieval); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking; MEDLINE; Evidence-based medicine; Impact factor; Medical literature; Citation analysis; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Family medicine; Library science; Information retrieval; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7154563070117698,"score_gpt":0.6409481131763418,"score_spread":0.07450819383542795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095126174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807661,0.0013660595,0.000029110208,0.0054476885,0.0023424109,0.00040280592,0.000013710045,0.000044016324,0.009588076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99012035,0.004475957,0.00020381888,0.00015989467,0.00031936818,0.00001910896,0.000009482928,0.000029494282,0.0046625356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800803,0.0023901255,0.0030044315,0.0016361742,0.011213804,0.0016751487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9166058,0.07416992,0.00036079713,0.0016112607,0.0051317867,0.002120488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20632394,0.00023565094,0.0007705077,0.057545383,0.0006461559,0.0017567859,0.0017708403,0.00095562433,0.0017559516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3018581,0.00015731825,0.0005229194,0.21277034,0.0024664828,0.00048193306,0.001580975,0.0059602954,0.00083514675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005109628,0.00034258672,0.68418074,0.0000047230724,0.00001783833,0.00033624194,0.000040403043,0.0000027590206,0.00016752498,0.0017585664,0.0129373055,0.3001602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012054421,0.00027082776,0.8900953,0.000039724702,0.000006505103,0.000074384116,0.00029623145,0.01259204,0.000039393297,0.03274859,0.06233173,0.0002998664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014870889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022808387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29986033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037990783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009694806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095560558","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.108","title":"Single Authors Are Not Alone: Colleagues Often Help","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5729729955135182,"score_gpt":0.500869914673737,"score_spread":0.07210308083978123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095560558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240908,0.004545751,0.0051311417,0.029708749,0.0046826056,0.00020103429,0.0000380114,0.000030147723,0.031571753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847288,0.00011628533,0.007567663,0.001331615,0.0004106975,0.0000012373473,7.388694e-7,0.00002209229,0.0058208415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739448,0.0010910251,0.0020554785,0.0005844382,0.021489464,0.00083482376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586787,0.0062037697,0.0027282184,0.0008760568,0.02996301,0.0015502338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1173359,0.00020942661,0.0006521287,0.06226433,0.00054564327,0.20049338,0.005164361,0.00036091974,0.0005175159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5364989,0.00014243805,0.00041245896,0.12866235,0.00012955848,0.09470325,0.0005412678,0.002531381,0.00011483615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467921,0.00058933493,0.33653572,0.000007896298,0.00008820936,0.00035659852,0.00043661732,0.00008160389,0.008293746,0.0030372671,0.54458326,0.10589505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022831412,0.00071283086,0.16841069,0.00011446914,0.00003178444,0.0005701781,0.0057110433,0.00023292632,0.008797466,0.02724032,0.7853989,0.0004962738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041741027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012722613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.419163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040692324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006918128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096088228","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.67","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Index (typography); Impact factor; Science Citation Index; Social science; Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5214194647309455,"score_gpt":0.5460663255256983,"score_spread":0.024646860794752867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096088228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406416,0.000479463,0.0003936537,0.14191137,0.00072370924,0.000072263,0.0000031771096,0.0000030253157,0.015771704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979479,0.00005606337,0.0009801523,0.00024804403,0.00042743827,5.906447e-7,3.4944796e-7,0.000002165326,0.0003373161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842442,0.000335838,0.0012696312,0.00028278344,0.013544473,0.00032304003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97817135,0.0023269667,0.0016166286,0.00025682012,0.017505286,0.00012292672],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13778876,0.00007053366,0.00020706667,0.031811487,0.00043537642,0.09619536,0.006458803,0.00009301065,0.000044369222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28867754,0.000039749048,0.00013355487,0.0909909,0.00019812585,0.07792257,0.0003481242,0.0010361,0.0000045890447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050114588,0.0002188708,0.49302253,9.612043e-7,0.000011936243,0.0000043661416,0.00029287845,0.000058015958,0.005026563,0.022883905,0.066265106,0.41216475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036401988,0.00016752456,0.9059202,0.000010956795,0.0000020845935,0.00002599815,0.00073152885,0.0008517893,0.0007141555,0.056810535,0.034336627,0.000064549175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017800146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049574437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41289768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001838644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005975875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096119600","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0024-y","title":"Inequality and cumulative advantage in science careers: a case study of high-impact journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Inequality; Publishing; Citation impact; Productivity; Publication; Gini coefficient; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Economic inequality; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.7717071333746156,"score_gpt":0.6827132583531631,"score_spread":0.0889938750214525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096119600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99644595,0.00013769326,0.0022629777,0.000094134106,0.00022939453,0.00034694528,0.00016904014,0.0000073091546,0.00030653132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988333,0.000027857239,0.0010592006,0.000026049765,0.000024668207,0.0000025310053,0.0000012210226,0.0000042374836,0.000020964406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98048836,0.00053607626,0.0010964015,0.00180948,0.015160574,0.0009090835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853236,0.0055246465,0.00063201535,0.0036467647,0.0039287903,0.0009442047],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16038962,0.00016778891,0.0004807424,0.053718746,0.0006870691,0.0032842674,0.009054329,0.000039860228,0.00009091958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1493065,0.00010697721,0.000028955074,0.26192713,0.002896502,0.008303492,0.0068159755,0.00032232836,0.000014227023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020354944,0.00048805316,0.8842402,0.0000038962835,0.0000035315402,0.0002263047,0.0030596748,0.00024932172,0.0038113897,0.00028837763,0.00010107159,0.107507795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010373531,0.00083769945,0.90415895,0.000018762848,0.000004920641,0.00025413264,0.021093855,0.07000024,0.00061767723,0.0016504817,0.00009823749,0.00022767218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008801027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011028282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2082084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018804465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009488858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096432317","doi":"10.2196/jmir.8.2.e8","title":"The Open Access Advantage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Publishing; World Wide Web; Open data; Open access journal; Internet privacy; Computer science; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.7216890307649272,"score_gpt":0.7454559918373117,"score_spread":0.023766961072384518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096432317","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056034577,0.008104687,0.0009471418,0.016144667,0.933327,0.00051783,0.000062939216,0.0000060605043,0.040329337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003578235,0.013772208,0.00008338579,0.00008718947,0.841974,0.0000223684,0.000015199462,0.000056566703,0.14041086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7862734,0.005033614,0.0040172725,0.001080487,0.20166084,0.0019343711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5592096,0.34827498,0.00393593,0.0036585722,0.08058878,0.004332169],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4494099,0.0003096074,0.0011565174,0.053808946,0.00055762165,0.070842996,0.11963531,0.0016018142,0.0050981613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6908848,0.0001402455,0.00055873994,0.09856787,0.001633325,0.0021159577,0.03832491,0.013284684,0.0005538415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019431608,0.00018378819,0.00034965712,0.000011181302,0.000062366795,0.00075105805,0.000019307312,6.9108523e-7,0.0000015269092,0.0003713801,0.870083,0.12797177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000831501,0.0005875663,0.00022866018,0.00023530118,0.0000072613066,0.00004007766,0.0001808298,0.00048005636,0.00003606406,0.011092509,0.9861267,0.00015343515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020919123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007434771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34324136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077737024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010313903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097026038","doi":"10.18438/b89c70","title":"Looking for Links: How Faculty Research Productivity Correlates with Library Investment and Why Electronic Library Materials Matter Most","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Productivity; Investment (military); Institution; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarly communication; Ordinary least squares; Public relations; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Economics; Political science; Social science; Econometrics; Publishing","score_opus":0.3275103745388362,"score_gpt":0.47358921092200307,"score_spread":0.14607883638316688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097026038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34187838,0.0048318487,0.0049334583,0.6338429,0.0004622221,0.003381941,0.00032142721,0.0002512688,0.0100965435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8941167,0.002851143,0.020078938,0.075629205,0.00037458757,0.0003609767,0.00043636386,0.000063868116,0.0060882205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934801,0.001046556,0.00063707447,0.0006181995,0.0035164985,0.00070160994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984601,0.01282259,0.00056762854,0.0006149123,0.00081112876,0.0005827063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013050304,0.00022899208,0.00030277338,0.010088502,0.00048569168,0.016370792,0.00096697203,0.0002099124,0.00042223706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02696882,0.00015237705,0.000033447475,0.028751498,0.0003163131,0.3722342,0.0009199059,0.0006813948,0.00010027045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043317084,0.0002649366,0.087037034,0.00033300818,0.00007279998,0.000015226461,0.00092532084,0.00012778478,0.00035625405,0.092203066,0.78220487,0.032127995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088121206,0.0011591633,0.010083428,0.00016786635,0.000016814853,0.000045103327,0.0016636688,0.003067896,0.015794525,0.006646977,0.9601689,0.00030447633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066408857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.663334e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5582137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030432087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014155522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097269731","doi":"10.1023/b:scie.0000027677.79173.b8","title":"The classification of biomedical journals by research level","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Science Citation Index; Information retrieval; Basic research; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.9272708597111224,"score_gpt":0.7093757539334359,"score_spread":0.21789510577768656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097269731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835268,0.01285592,0.06419225,0.020682685,0.0030844128,0.0008100205,0.00031111806,0.00004413114,0.0144926775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374163,0.0012607563,0.0012231361,0.000047540336,0.000102174934,0.000012813608,0.0000053089684,0.000012666737,0.0035939931],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9392418,0.0007403781,0.0016692668,0.0009770918,0.05584848,0.0015229603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95609325,0.0199717,0.00067840895,0.0018405326,0.020194031,0.0012220936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20571366,0.00015457203,0.00032768692,0.1777989,0.0015367926,0.004603872,0.007405369,0.00021015077,0.00020755702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30833465,0.000084796695,0.00020159756,0.7157363,0.002311401,0.0006741668,0.0011950918,0.000835082,0.0006112434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003475098,0.00084697886,0.02419321,0.0000072707385,0.000025773312,0.0000072678627,0.00036233422,0.000033834884,0.053912126,0.019815782,0.26467213,0.63608855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013741108,0.0006347309,0.40077558,0.000026228985,0.00000609612,0.00001834893,0.0022291394,0.0013206109,0.01171471,0.08020875,0.50139576,0.00029593564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001161045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000130394565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6357926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005187356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010557031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997631},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2098507569","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1788-y","title":"Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Regional science; Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Econometrics; Data science; Library science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8230981755742243,"score_gpt":0.5877561517828117,"score_spread":0.23534202379141256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098507569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924242,0.00031583683,0.0030082287,0.00033719672,0.00030467034,0.00065892114,0.0009107823,0.000018068544,0.0020220887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881154,0.000041456187,0.00028269182,0.000060803442,0.000018434226,0.0000015857662,0.000012185662,0.0000123644495,0.0007589151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740435,0.001167949,0.0011139103,0.0015930135,0.021348821,0.0007327967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96223694,0.021159993,0.0012336256,0.0051588314,0.009058973,0.0011516481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08615682,0.0003086135,0.0010039281,0.9048277,0.0003301841,0.001443172,0.0058023953,0.00014108872,0.000073583986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18275133,0.00017951052,0.00036465723,0.98116934,0.0006142933,0.0007273988,0.0023093624,0.0003870095,0.000026731663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020685753,0.0020560229,0.92641646,0.000008197001,0.00037756676,0.0004309792,0.0008712417,0.0020481262,0.0000112717635,0.00006946288,0.01462197,0.052881848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017785599,0.0028630614,0.82521796,0.000008988508,0.0003901591,0.000019443925,0.012684992,0.154682,0.000041024337,0.000060354625,0.0019845546,0.00026889323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027090725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011737597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15263386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003396087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007678303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098698373","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504201210","title":"Going beyond counting first authors in author co‐citation analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Computer science; Statistics; Information retrieval; Data science; Mathematics; Library science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.14995783970350976,"score_gpt":0.4770494582581099,"score_spread":0.3270916185546001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098698373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98652,0.000028647804,0.0011058132,0.010460489,0.000042348176,0.00028518084,0.000014535169,0.000027320819,0.0015156817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893425,0.000049000715,0.010179128,0.00031621137,0.000010977989,0.000026912821,7.670372e-7,0.0000023800624,0.00007213395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949317,0.000003869618,0.0007239047,0.0003104339,0.0035594136,0.0004706891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924393,0.0006072313,0.0011067387,0.00018754322,0.0055662426,0.00009292149],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0227502,0.0000947189,0.00029196343,0.029348483,0.0006357014,0.0009612847,0.0018426833,0.00007400681,0.0000044121443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024711829,0.00006355551,0.00017286676,0.306117,0.0021970787,0.0038559188,0.00045951997,0.00018750357,0.000006640835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015899888,0.00003961,0.63791406,0.000024208446,0.00004468492,1.2936837e-8,0.0032391013,0.00014571012,0.0044953725,0.0265592,0.0061969236,0.32132518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084159547,0.00030771262,0.3516653,0.000023559052,0.000080945625,0.0000067632222,0.049463943,0.43674913,0.017814472,0.014295969,0.12832542,0.00042520394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025716832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000952717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43660343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020469986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017865808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98350346},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2100283551","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1105","title":"Point &amp; Counterpoint The Purpose of Institutional Repositories: Green OA or Beyond?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Counterpoint; Thriving; Institution; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Institutional repository; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.42596659035908846,"score_gpt":0.4744248978785353,"score_spread":0.04845830751944685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100283551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595287,0.0051074214,0.005472339,0.023968844,0.0004100054,0.00029964052,0.000012766138,0.0000072243965,0.0051930468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138826,0.0008853119,0.00597631,0.00036614243,0.000103739134,0.0000056463814,0.000002684408,0.0000062239487,0.0012657025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935814,0.0008687336,0.0013369125,0.00017622631,0.0038446882,0.00019200215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876231,0.005099268,0.0011815423,0.0011980818,0.004634632,0.0002633787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018820891,0.000108534055,0.00029757596,0.006900523,0.0005211779,0.007641973,0.0036735414,0.00011724535,0.00030398043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019886583,0.000053598797,0.00013386282,0.019607587,0.00039880385,0.011514105,0.00077021966,0.00080554816,0.000031167758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059067534,0.00072383886,0.4918452,0.00003676645,0.00022293194,0.000019524947,0.010683842,0.000043856282,0.009196489,0.06905084,0.05195153,0.36563453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010924896,0.0005107554,0.7695816,0.00009269815,0.000028301669,0.00037185094,0.0027578494,0.0005756096,0.00058701553,0.12283391,0.10137911,0.0001887787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028626708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032680804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36544573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059802624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049238914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100848965","doi":"10.5860/crl.63.6.562","title":"Evaluating Academic Journals without Impact Factors for Collection Management Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Citation; Annals; Impact factor; Relation (database); Medical journal; Citation analysis; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Political science; History; Data mining","score_opus":0.917280069484004,"score_gpt":0.6980711522304383,"score_spread":0.21920891725356573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100848965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613061,0.0074042063,0.0054425616,0.0032418491,0.0007707589,0.0029717518,0.0003641753,0.00009361233,0.018405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381782,0.0022286288,0.007136583,0.00006131791,0.00023361159,0.00024260815,0.000009050698,0.000043710177,0.05186628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.974429,0.0014593314,0.0013248723,0.0011843141,0.019730102,0.0018723463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459999,0.045115978,0.00034811642,0.001207857,0.0060897646,0.0012383355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055596985,0.00029737703,0.00058618665,0.07656326,0.0033071495,0.007235059,0.0041530738,0.00029569792,0.0043281596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18351026,0.00019364075,0.00042826348,0.20136662,0.0005950748,0.0033816304,0.0018089833,0.0012541722,0.00042397671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029432884,0.0002536209,0.099579014,0.00001573136,0.00012776352,0.000022956747,0.0008972665,0.00019587598,0.0012323123,0.007045976,0.7712101,0.119125105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042119804,0.0032994032,0.36180624,0.00019541351,0.000039750907,0.000036167137,0.013434233,0.2125179,0.0036563121,0.23343794,0.16642083,0.0009438149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030731142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067807696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6047892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004935314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005113364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102705305","doi":"10.1007/s11192-008-0106-3","title":"The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Altmetrics; Graduate students; Peer review; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.7238816379522245,"score_gpt":0.6807475618396931,"score_spread":0.043134076112531394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102705305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818325,0.009835767,0.0066321557,0.00051023206,0.0005240319,0.00045071793,0.0000269202,0.00001534268,0.00017232267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712825,0.0013424626,0.0009149256,0.000008130403,0.00004002873,0.000020155185,0.0000023211767,0.00000938659,0.0005343276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322665,0.00011100606,0.0008981966,0.0007831079,0.0040883967,0.0008926188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94417477,0.044209804,0.0006803746,0.00088267814,0.00966383,0.0003885278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.073450044,0.00015682058,0.0003083725,0.04414637,0.0020475897,0.003741698,0.0011878463,0.00006487826,0.0000015446439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16636352,0.00008314037,0.00016062449,0.23673761,0.001217727,0.000598426,0.00040670228,0.00014999232,0.0000019878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069667665,0.00007401209,0.5932082,0.0000140862785,0.00008713714,3.5983314e-7,0.0023175923,0.000017344633,0.0036106675,0.016161615,0.0009971547,0.3834422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024675686,0.00037430256,0.941357,0.000007885856,0.000020874442,0.0000060073335,0.004757581,0.0009631797,0.0020442544,0.04886956,0.0012230116,0.00012957356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043252636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008884861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3833126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018816313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031400818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103185235","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.010","title":"Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medical journal; Medicine; New england; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical literature; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Law; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7354483997857146,"score_gpt":0.713000899036358,"score_spread":0.02244750074935664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103185235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95541596,0.0036431744,0.015600726,0.021421261,0.0024501514,0.00016226055,0.000008302181,0.0000038208436,0.001294344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583894,0.0007060465,0.00090030284,0.00087655766,0.00088766654,7.004151e-7,0.0000011153386,0.0000040959444,0.0007845797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98114616,0.006469359,0.007938932,0.00038151903,0.003306236,0.0007577703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87708,0.11396171,0.0050531877,0.00034994975,0.0029345755,0.0006205788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38574484,0.00013105886,0.0024933077,0.02124649,0.000061669314,0.000042394167,0.0011285113,0.00037285656,0.0005383229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70851517,0.000065530985,0.0005508125,0.024923835,0.00026392256,0.0002606908,0.00011094738,0.0010639027,0.000048508406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076921843,0.00016585592,0.46842226,0.000008023374,0.000056516303,0.000090660484,0.00006142524,0.00017108936,0.00019608333,0.005075705,0.053165868,0.47181728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003154751,0.005331734,0.8733127,0.00013625866,0.00003327923,0.000110102825,0.00005850595,0.011403053,0.00010639388,0.092887856,0.01335386,0.00011149601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009815785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018654554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4717058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007749824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017239599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103690356","doi":"10.2319/071113-507.1","title":"Exploring the publications in three major orthodontic journals: A comparative analysis of two 5-year periods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Angle Orthodontist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Orthodontics; Medicine","score_opus":0.8034859756788659,"score_gpt":0.5749723091992582,"score_spread":0.2285136664796077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103690356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783732,0.00080539484,0.008487848,0.0035091655,0.0001714241,0.00047985683,0.000027179949,0.000014651231,0.008131238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682325,0.00014332698,0.0015702276,0.00006545313,0.00004851888,0.0001378871,0.0000036686479,0.0000075957064,0.0012000458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276656,0.00097367686,0.001070255,0.00047582673,0.004182824,0.0005308752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766613,0.007461561,0.0005245578,0.0015548524,0.0025924537,0.00020044686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02421731,0.00016451691,0.00061691157,0.029735003,0.00048012502,0.0026312047,0.0033271513,0.000036303758,0.0018512789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010071547,0.00007660539,0.0003919098,0.235151,0.00041888657,0.0012344304,0.0006382245,0.00039443895,0.00025049553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009291707,0.00010908558,0.9679926,0.0000014788185,0.0002253108,0.0000017838479,0.0011541838,0.00044678425,0.00028452856,0.006836113,0.0018930502,0.021045802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023627025,0.0000340298,0.9814605,0.0000063610714,0.00008975185,0.0000028653742,0.0026896938,0.010762771,0.00007642337,0.0026814695,0.0018571402,0.000102715916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033614272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010571647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.205416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006863294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119301854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104239154","doi":"10.1123/apaq.18.2.119","title":"The Impact Factor and APAQ","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Prestige; Citation; Period (music); Psychology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.44843151926839125,"score_gpt":0.5541612635849343,"score_spread":0.10572974431654308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104239154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99422,0.00009896567,0.0016772088,0.0012392289,0.00010024317,0.00016955893,0.00002537414,0.000030208597,0.0024391813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885285,0.00002936342,0.000017739769,0.000017369633,0.00014232699,0.000007678495,5.611493e-7,0.000008820023,0.0009233081],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944333,0.0002682846,0.00020388464,0.0005544186,0.003923996,0.0006161232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993075,0.008180932,0.00013814803,0.0006512682,0.0006493302,0.00044954682],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023514703,0.00017609494,0.0002868753,0.0038546366,0.0005399513,0.0026138532,0.0011030786,0.0000623661,0.00009544996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053741,0.00008519374,0.0001982594,0.03973145,0.00025529158,0.0008604302,0.00013544392,0.0003503327,0.00032797072],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006412471,0.00029612685,0.006661452,3.8173914e-7,0.000019562045,0.000006658755,0.00024998735,0.0000026274224,0.002836196,0.00048813023,0.0013218455,0.9880529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003954655,0.0012449918,0.91460663,0.0000021964593,0.000004306677,0.000014010796,0.00036781828,0.046494536,0.00042574215,0.024617491,0.011600835,0.00022596732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038634354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032979045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98782694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058018748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000730461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104776127","doi":"10.1093/bja/aeq403","title":"h-indices in a university department of anaesthesia: an evaluation of their feasibility, reliability, and validity as an assessment of academic performance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Psychology; Statistics; Significant difference; Index (typography); Reliability (semiconductor); Validity; Mathematics; Web of science; Medicine; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Psychometrics; Computer science; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.4827083805479551,"score_gpt":0.5104722788358582,"score_spread":0.0277638982879031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104776127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985345,0.00059562776,0.00006776186,0.000043068085,0.000042584365,0.00031353714,0.000023008804,0.000002342193,0.0003775501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950229,0.003108524,0.00183839,0.000007178021,0.000010835877,6.3671376e-7,0.000001586599,0.000005763504,0.000004171891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908433,0.0017571303,0.001281468,0.0003888029,0.005466626,0.0002626574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317497,0.0003752584,0.0014645575,0.0004359866,0.0042437017,0.00030549735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05965512,0.00012018498,0.0005852231,0.009047168,0.00008309146,0.00009078271,0.0014937712,0.0001500487,0.00008805897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028907827,0.000104991115,0.00013420863,0.015739018,0.00040513847,0.0016414347,0.00019462922,0.00038106754,4.6955248e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009987898,0.0006485536,0.8132701,0.00001733629,0.0000087465305,0.000024440242,0.000339735,0.00006911806,0.00012643023,0.00007902079,0.000015476739,0.18530115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009358593,0.0030845557,0.98370725,0.00009725901,0.00003243906,0.000119581986,0.0014598828,0.0042025223,0.0013672113,0.004866487,0.000033982356,0.00009298863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008281282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029591285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18520816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020439188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008708961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96828294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104813218","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/4954h","title":"All that glitters is not gold: The shaping of contemporary journal peer review at scientific and medical journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Judgement; Peer review; Dynamics (music); Process (computing); Psychology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.891900708989214,"score_gpt":0.6416149137985736,"score_spread":0.2502857951906404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104813218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1263493,0.37701148,0.0011468331,0.45366767,0.0073727593,0.0012676385,0.00026465856,0.000020768755,0.03289891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80561095,0.11372636,0.00045609177,0.012476425,0.0004114531,0.000014263992,0.000012400842,0.000032140517,0.067259885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93848217,0.000983806,0.002257448,0.0013259526,0.05618612,0.00076451147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96601206,0.0076924115,0.0038833404,0.003446226,0.017197853,0.0017681144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2507972,0.00035070992,0.0012292797,0.02858229,0.0011820102,0.018789612,0.011776283,0.00042528065,0.0075706188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15038751,0.00016592004,0.0007240111,0.020711515,0.0018535403,0.0007564443,0.012624001,0.002194246,0.00014943244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001541118,0.00003722107,0.024870621,0.00014816421,0.00008691701,0.000060328475,0.00020158073,6.13123e-7,0.000045316516,0.000041221458,0.9299744,0.044518214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006381267,0.00006069612,0.050276957,0.0036561245,0.000057949685,0.00047739,0.00024175546,0.0014744317,0.00044458616,0.0068190615,0.9354013,0.00045157637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013422407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016802305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6792617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015383557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017802999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104991133","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p72","title":"Research Performance Measures and the Moderating Role of Faculty Characteristics in Epidemiology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Health Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Multivariate statistics; Ranking (information retrieval); Descriptive statistics; Statistics; Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Complement (music); Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining; Information retrieval; Biology","score_opus":0.8213244271721941,"score_gpt":0.6707080874912038,"score_spread":0.1506163396809903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104991133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899034,0.0040015723,0.0010342466,0.0038361608,0.00024784124,0.00013610117,0.000007914736,0.0000011869635,0.0008316067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733955,0.00066353555,0.0018126543,0.00013394654,0.000038948237,0.0000010169185,9.942569e-8,0.0000013371822,0.000008936384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98440963,0.0015380315,0.0021343727,0.0003535853,0.010631951,0.00093240215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842229,0.003697415,0.0012504112,0.00035394434,0.009794275,0.0006810742],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37683472,0.00007438769,0.0005733407,0.009701207,0.00041610198,0.0003815406,0.0025227948,0.00004628377,0.0000031682837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320106,0.00003687051,0.000047119414,0.07001015,0.0022969258,0.00070055376,0.00063567073,0.00049578224,0.0000052642695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008891382,0.000028091406,0.729579,0.0000039135066,0.0000011863231,0.0000013757589,0.0002636361,0.0002407997,0.000026202742,0.002486582,0.0003384426,0.2669419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007735574,0.00038584936,0.92378396,0.000037808528,6.67548e-7,0.00013670082,0.0025840548,0.044520497,0.000046213565,0.02690024,0.00078483624,0.00004560525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004279011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018663353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2668963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034976166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032955257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9497572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107222004","doi":"10.1002/asi.21621","title":"What does the g‐index really measure?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Index (typography); Consistency (knowledge bases); Statistics; Mathematics; Internal consistency; Econometrics; Computer science; Data mining; Discrete mathematics; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.2563697079422282,"score_gpt":0.4736868469626427,"score_spread":0.2173171390204145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107222004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94384617,0.00034158732,0.011512989,0.040784296,0.0015939939,0.00040745104,0.00000788359,0.000019939762,0.001485698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549747,0.0007664773,0.001958956,0.001652788,0.000030319916,0.0000051737607,4.113875e-8,0.0000021105864,0.00008666925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366266,0.000033670927,0.000676581,0.00013883201,0.0051404843,0.00034777648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98773926,0.000736964,0.001584049,0.0005327801,0.0092898365,0.00011708375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029737104,0.00007989994,0.0002115356,0.008200603,0.0008355225,0.0016803077,0.004269239,0.000052387095,0.000009037858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018655725,0.000029024111,0.00023934177,0.102940656,0.004324087,0.005479377,0.0006360595,0.00029981416,0.000006321642],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003482686,0.000026739193,0.020616023,0.0000025346183,0.000029027955,2.0039846e-7,0.0030688732,0.0000039444426,0.0007593007,0.0074442592,0.012346389,0.95566785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012350861,0.0012235407,0.1737075,0.00004417023,0.000047270936,0.00034366865,0.2522702,0.0072618295,0.010221968,0.13144891,0.42182627,0.00036958445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017117847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043639056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009393606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005943317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107753302","doi":"10.1037/a0027731","title":"Assessing the publication productivity of clinical psychology professors in Canadian Psychological Association-accredited Canadian psychology departments.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Association (psychology); Consulting psychology; Accreditation; Professional psychology; Applied psychology; Psychological research; Productivity; Professional association; School psychology; Medical education; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychotherapist; Political science; Burnout; Medicine","score_opus":0.7920265339930753,"score_gpt":0.6846769874817195,"score_spread":0.10734954651135586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107753302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8218268,0.0009722629,0.00006235569,0.08592092,0.013984446,0.0017016114,0.0005832431,0.000058230144,0.0748901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705607,0.00026473872,0.0005592332,0.02606063,0.0008665837,0.0002954545,0.00020290512,0.000079454294,0.00111026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97708875,0.004801506,0.0041277376,0.0032401085,0.002587071,0.008154809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97533566,0.0038043743,0.0018052844,0.0047305687,0.004033709,0.010290435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08694803,0.0008057229,0.0016716272,0.04639855,0.0010379036,0.000896318,0.007438545,0.0025128175,0.0032353082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095048115,0.0006350398,0.0005137099,0.07249781,0.0014370984,0.0018566068,0.00020742194,0.003216254,0.0011175866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031915388,0.0003249156,0.6975903,0.0000029147973,0.00007235985,0.00006762357,0.0002009647,0.0000029663893,0.000041932326,0.00070276845,0.25384393,0.047117412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080674,0.00022648032,0.6951351,0.000008449631,0.000020672167,0.000096920834,0.00033880628,0.000036207726,0.00000488747,0.001710816,0.30087903,0.00046197837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9426224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1487339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004390497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005605391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108009836","doi":"10.1177/154193120204601104","title":"Does the Jerome H. Ely <i>Human Factors</i> Article Award Predict Scientific Impact?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Receipt; Citation; Impact factor; Variance (accounting); Productivity; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.19409163627300557,"score_gpt":0.4053774046395725,"score_spread":0.21128576836656693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108009836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99756896,0.00027162023,0.0000033707677,0.00046029667,0.0005251859,0.0003297278,0.00015341099,0.00004054859,0.0006468841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793935,0.00008719774,0.00006853921,0.000049578608,0.000149693,0.000006248272,0.000002042858,0.000024938676,0.0016723848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941522,0.00004932182,0.00095018727,0.0008720364,0.0030924866,0.0008838059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531466,0.0012485642,0.0008179023,0.00046901774,0.0017792775,0.0003705585],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009489773,0.00033810438,0.0004744343,0.0016624392,0.003462506,0.004399905,0.0030155778,0.00018016601,0.00014457466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040987055,0.00013361253,0.00069568615,0.015029303,0.0013249941,0.0012672915,0.0016994921,0.0005712309,0.000011153159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073485544,0.00012660769,0.9272616,0.000023343795,0.00006673894,8.107259e-8,0.011768369,0.000022510858,0.02584543,0.00048769635,0.033859897,0.00053036347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006202819,0.0002563734,0.92236483,0.0000676918,0.000057166253,0.0000027713088,0.03515242,0.0035305126,0.023854453,0.0060659787,0.0074951053,0.00053243415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020161364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014083772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026364792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017345966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003926789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109652142","doi":"10.1142/s0218194013500423","title":"A BIBLIOMETRIC/GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF 40 YEARS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH (1969–2009)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Software; Computer science; Regional science; Data science; Geography; Library science; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.2055682898619816,"score_gpt":0.4921563615569048,"score_spread":0.2865880716949232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109652142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8688227,0.005969199,0.12296087,0.000044936707,0.0019064313,0.00017526407,0.000036700003,0.000045133995,0.000038759874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95010346,0.0007922785,0.04866916,0.0000029650678,0.00029507687,0.0000119503065,0.0000024766719,0.00004238417,0.00008024518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911219,0.00007559995,0.0016273973,0.00039995505,0.006160971,0.00061416154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794604,0.008851685,0.0004911379,0.00042023606,0.010261104,0.0005154229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108170565,0.00026345756,0.00068044587,0.2526063,0.00004891192,0.00065776124,0.0022345765,0.0001879167,0.0001182008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055478774,0.00023631647,0.00032427278,0.15330122,0.0000967682,0.0009061098,0.0006935332,0.0009331672,0.000014928439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056969326,0.00083040737,0.4492139,0.0005279941,0.001137969,0.0001636957,0.00087201485,0.16966921,0.03456431,0.001410608,0.0031577707,0.33839515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009852205,0.0003938277,0.8855065,0.000582957,0.00002054075,0.00012478029,0.00011783271,0.10234368,0.0024260369,0.00013557584,0.0069994205,0.00036361945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060982453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.7440367e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4362926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001886737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000267116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211020255","doi":"","title":"Review of: The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology As If Economics Really Mattered","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economic methodology; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3638477367674648,"score_gpt":0.47139311692735003,"score_spread":0.10754538015988524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211020255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98390794,0.002686374,0.0004934626,0.0017427994,0.00024164729,0.00023694146,0.00006114839,0.0000049750943,0.010624702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685061,0.023966182,0.003865828,0.0004687404,0.000018833403,2.7401035e-7,0.0000023521914,0.000007927206,0.003163754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697083,0.0005047545,0.0006126776,0.0005936214,0.00093726115,0.00038083622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994084,0.0026479866,0.00076151354,0.0010049185,0.0012833046,0.00021828077],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018218238,0.00012895394,0.0006769723,0.0076207765,0.00037470192,0.00011472499,0.0031024225,0.00012691643,0.0016377154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054846993,0.00010671278,0.00023671937,0.021709424,0.0041838437,0.0005435742,0.0009229731,0.00017182334,0.00006293141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002358864,0.00024051436,0.08112885,0.00081624574,0.00016046759,0.0000070568076,0.0021583969,0.00025398252,0.00019202918,0.8708103,0.0057221684,0.03827411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034226727,0.00014475506,0.029860713,0.00006581378,0.000025795292,0.000032394873,0.0011928983,0.0002873856,0.000016266444,0.9634195,0.004504622,0.000107573695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069395377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013831348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09260922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011903411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000609613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110877077","doi":"","title":"The 'Mobilization-Network' Approach for the Social Network Analysis of Knowledge Mobilization in Science Research and Innovation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mobilization; Asset (computer security); Social network analysis; Community mobilization; Resource mobilization; Civil society; Public relations; Political science; Empirical research; Social mobilization; Knowledge management; Business; Politics; Social movement; Computer science; Social capital","score_opus":0.5763332165271468,"score_gpt":0.5660140706941045,"score_spread":0.010319145833042276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110877077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7010365,0.0006142871,0.26597765,0.002503077,0.00019410317,0.0022910729,0.00003264452,0.000015033931,0.027335612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965549,0.00023831452,0.0014094023,0.000004159264,0.00007412813,0.0000061522933,0.000009782549,0.0000053492286,0.0016977856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.988953,0.0013518308,0.00048653624,0.00067185826,0.0076216,0.00091517484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95203084,0.026859712,0.00028630497,0.0008119917,0.019876014,0.00013515339],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18382655,0.00008089604,0.00029782217,0.04856497,0.004088121,0.000656947,0.0035131206,0.0001102318,0.000029001538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030979617,0.000054565517,0.00008699156,0.5053062,0.0045598266,0.00049899414,0.0014156682,0.00042086776,0.0000033182682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275966,0.0002269183,0.39352742,0.000024295361,0.00008033095,2.4988051e-7,0.001364783,0.014716292,0.00033841282,0.48592144,0.011193795,0.092563316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032470067,0.00017572229,0.3909907,0.000005013822,0.00001306992,1.152603e-7,0.0052240514,0.5736113,0.00003883769,0.013399616,0.016156076,0.00006079982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013431507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010802989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.558895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017557616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005191147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111628838","doi":"10.2307/4132319","title":"Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"MIS Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Feature (linguistics); Management science; Data science; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.4369668315161285,"score_gpt":0.5654664307492029,"score_spread":0.1284995992330744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111628838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.331263e-7,0.9872779,0.0017231683,0.005887844,0.0008790038,0.0033077933,0.0003088917,0.00002656435,0.0005882532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000003392505,0.99273473,0.00033497618,0.0006414147,0.002072021,0.00070502824,0.00003016264,0.000040704388,0.0034375761],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896587,0.0009067966,0.0018824786,0.0013741299,0.005223986,0.000953872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97768766,0.015495573,0.00082880666,0.0027469,0.002842499,0.00039854995],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028720314,0.0005185538,0.0017249454,0.01612707,0.0009652368,0.008473757,0.007581954,0.00028518226,0.00039890982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085605765,0.00020098526,0.0017295795,0.2051012,0.00008391064,0.00029480745,0.00023999454,0.00076437544,0.0004877871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.735458e-7,0.000014008318,0.0000040313453,0.0028294532,0.000038199927,0.0000055697465,0.00017274196,7.628163e-8,2.2639046e-8,0.00003456629,0.29223955,0.70466083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063720785,0.00019555993,0.000011516871,0.013942682,0.00021542478,0.00005090867,0.00027175943,0.00006869698,1.4847935e-8,0.00009106088,0.9848133,0.00027540172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004150402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017780423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7043854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012641844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015794451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112258233","doi":"10.5539/ies.v6n11p93","title":"Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Visibility; Download; Citation impact; Computer science; Citation analysis; Higher education; Mathematics education; Data science; Information retrieval; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.6060151052682781,"score_gpt":0.6506735322684306,"score_spread":0.044658427000152545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112258233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95142347,0.0018512527,0.01716869,0.0057108784,0.006126605,0.00078876445,0.000020136162,0.000030851555,0.016879352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856131,0.00009702618,0.010594769,0.0003356529,0.0003155901,0.00078567024,0.000013523381,0.000006760992,0.0022378864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625796,0.0001350158,0.00045633383,0.0003977726,0.0025437118,0.00020919583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595705,0.008844805,0.0002675595,0.00023378074,0.030974444,0.00010889839],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00507121,0.00010409464,0.00016631476,0.013157216,0.00023604833,0.0021311103,0.0007687551,0.00004217052,0.00032520044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0832889,0.000075216594,0.00009172739,0.014688429,0.00011385356,0.0016603355,0.0001451577,0.000079273705,0.0004234916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024764235,0.0002893058,0.0931156,0.000014977461,0.00020013476,2.7677132e-7,0.0019689766,0.00004543121,0.003414621,0.07614857,0.12885119,0.6959262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023525812,0.00007799619,0.29615209,0.000017583325,0.0000058868904,0.0000036604022,0.02004484,0.00081604865,0.00025105456,0.6637861,0.018476186,0.0001332851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040739033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018559498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69579285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024290332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003514465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112470296","doi":"10.1353/pla.2005.0003","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"portal Libraries and the Academy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5182908522097505,"score_gpt":0.5273793628003517,"score_spread":0.009088510590601229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112470296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286788,0.07247968,0.00030722906,0.07489621,0.000101078534,0.00043719268,0.00055231823,0.000023464881,0.022524018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889816,0.008806418,0.00039930662,0.0008291176,0.00009253671,0.000010183665,0.00001818041,0.00000647418,0.0008561955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583566,0.00023515987,0.00069306244,0.0005103577,0.002372656,0.00035309186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175096,0.006874222,0.00026563733,0.0008517688,0.00011507362,0.00014231588],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013707303,0.00012216909,0.00028953713,0.12320668,0.00026719924,0.0019613013,0.0034698723,0.00010188031,0.00021837611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005469949,0.000054726104,0.00005552523,0.46662992,0.00085220014,0.0022764618,0.001512288,0.00035379382,0.000009008653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003389605,0.000078703095,0.20105243,0.0000034023121,0.000017724165,0.0000015282186,0.00035694925,0.0000034495517,0.000016583168,0.14478818,0.05068836,0.6029588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005157445,0.000022988295,0.7365644,0.0000030521323,0.000009486572,0.000020466332,0.0003002249,0.0009055886,0.00002998836,0.018771963,0.2427806,0.00007547257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113807495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022940954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60288334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004258081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044865334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112651886","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.00454.x","title":"Economics research in Canada: a long‐run assessment of journal publications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Economics education; Library science; Applied economics; Political science; Institution; Economics; Positive economics; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Higher education; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8324857209259421,"score_gpt":0.44002664201038705,"score_spread":0.39245907891555504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112651886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876217,0.0004874795,0.00011000759,0.005953305,0.0016215481,0.00025940832,0.00020052941,0.0000012220858,0.00374479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967391,0.0011960388,0.0008165159,0.00016898604,0.00035341666,0.000009098526,0.0000047520616,0.000031297426,0.0006808332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940652,0.00049340655,0.0030804118,0.00059589004,0.0001143465,0.0016507136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838006,0.0033578281,0.0017173276,0.0009767427,0.0054633864,0.004684155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0263111,0.0002536373,0.0010278272,0.061167933,0.0005403858,0.00090128393,0.00425912,0.00019726144,0.00080735434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008607069,0.00025570535,0.00030201036,0.01930537,0.0005114519,0.0013676104,0.00015837546,0.0014882357,0.000015049282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028197936,0.00004913485,0.8843341,0.0000109139755,0.00008942003,0.00052819506,0.00043599046,0.015264675,0.000006846856,0.07582757,0.0096258605,0.013799133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017300632,0.0006322099,0.7540298,0.00008329464,0.000013623134,0.004204042,0.0027362441,0.014823942,0.000100650475,0.15607229,0.06494997,0.0006238933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13030428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017393082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11118486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113641312","doi":"10.4033/iee.v1i0.1949","title":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution – A new open-access model dedicated to the rapid release of creativity in peer-review publication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology; Biology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8387108462081876,"score_gpt":0.7197398142690772,"score_spread":0.1189710319391104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113641312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335211,0.038299873,0.0034817578,0.017672922,0.0001725052,0.001984942,0.0000594561,0.000008477903,0.0047989753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951029,0.0465398,0.00030797644,0.0007877648,0.000026620586,0.000081739505,0.000007799874,0.000014020934,0.0012052797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894091,0.001285363,0.0019494051,0.0008603818,0.0059556873,0.00054005714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886155,0.0031888317,0.0013807083,0.0010175399,0.0051477086,0.00064967247],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041711617,0.00022164348,0.0010254754,0.03572519,0.00025929272,0.0042644045,0.013988874,0.00013072173,0.0033601697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08931438,0.0001489916,0.0001135287,0.13345252,0.0002515171,0.007174904,0.0066148345,0.00049927545,0.000021786062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116568124,0.00032024545,0.69081575,0.000028953174,0.000014052691,0.000009002794,0.0000859862,0.0005950445,0.00084901886,0.00012993981,0.25158378,0.055451665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064000784,0.000023699153,0.9720651,0.00020898765,0.000010627815,0.000012370553,0.000027643171,0.008374069,0.00043618176,0.0109455185,0.0070821,0.00017368898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008667554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012347482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28124937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027317254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014334279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114059546","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0132557","title":"How Long Is Too Long in Contemporary Peer Review? Perspectives from Authors Publishing in Conservation Biology Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Publishing; Peer review; Psychology; Prestige; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9005902623703669,"score_gpt":0.5770311754804135,"score_spread":0.3235590868899534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114059546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7590696,0.055258106,0.0003843568,0.18235399,0.00015250558,0.0003910153,0.00006019462,0.000014563168,0.0023156484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938644,0.002638737,0.00085459877,0.0014578849,0.000121981335,0.000019308525,0.000026468017,0.000010924408,0.0054836296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727316,0.00094750355,0.00092028873,0.000786347,0.009579585,0.00049312605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815771,0.004174719,0.0005702157,0.000722851,0.012408063,0.00054703886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052855425,0.00015107659,0.00063411624,0.032582548,0.00007051982,0.0060811997,0.0016960199,0.00021057324,0.00027234637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30549133,0.000113851296,0.00008443333,0.09215616,0.0001407435,0.004230018,0.00049635686,0.00072945596,0.00007465547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020058733,0.0004298584,0.8860663,0.000012811238,0.000024181387,0.00003690425,0.0012630105,4.5018203e-7,0.00035366922,0.00007832016,0.10785695,0.0038574776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014193783,0.00016103624,0.965643,0.00076618267,0.000011492832,0.000002686961,0.0059030685,0.0021322574,0.000921315,0.01619785,0.0065219426,0.00031980738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015447369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002892992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030426987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004879683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949506},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2114094964","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022","title":"The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Chart; Impact factor; Prestige; Medical education","score_opus":0.909042114022165,"score_gpt":0.6835457364923802,"score_spread":0.2254963775297848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114094964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8920344,0.047086887,0.017051127,0.036699325,0.002275734,0.00075914984,0.00004974226,0.000016016587,0.0040276214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913014,0.002632148,0.00013303537,0.0000412803,0.0002887843,0.00000892276,0.000003082629,0.000007964118,0.0055833384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929995,0.00011829463,0.0008328034,0.00033854975,0.0052838926,0.00042699502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98678696,0.0045306603,0.00035331756,0.00049956643,0.0070568384,0.00077266357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030115522,0.000119152726,0.00027996843,0.011023941,0.00016747945,0.00008891249,0.0008955704,0.000060115224,0.00022796048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23617364,0.000055568114,0.00012398456,0.07737207,0.00015055446,0.0003015246,0.00014151439,0.00009654691,0.000014403952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080076825,0.000049410457,0.038980044,0.0000039167176,0.000023770912,3.596822e-7,0.00029641634,0.0000055887035,0.0005500787,0.0006609125,0.7127495,0.24659996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019669447,0.0046055904,0.7160345,0.00007772451,0.000046501893,0.0000064846595,0.002102255,0.008486958,0.004924855,0.16044444,0.10096226,0.00034150906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029221553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051944364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67705446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016966758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021458864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114111800","doi":"10.1007/s11192-009-0035-9","title":"Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Fragmentation (computing); Attribution; Hierarchy; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.2500444637851816,"score_gpt":0.4672281133466309,"score_spread":0.2171836495614493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114111800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890583,0.0017600422,0.0033364631,0.0035030313,0.0003197615,0.00054609275,0.00036780266,0.000025570262,0.0010829418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534196,0.00045946438,0.0028283214,0.0006746614,0.000071258364,0.000008222213,0.000011109582,0.000015802616,0.00058918673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818282,0.00015578093,0.0015028804,0.0014305976,0.014086009,0.0009965448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856835,0.004478426,0.0009552816,0.0016578439,0.00623274,0.0009921911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014614199,0.00040432945,0.0011627743,0.46733135,0.00040089778,0.0021269815,0.0036570553,0.00023661014,0.00011328191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07676464,0.00025740347,0.00042822698,0.96132904,0.0011950658,0.00076726597,0.0016037195,0.00036974446,0.000004913722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000841349,0.00093458913,0.75776744,0.00009212612,0.0004545572,0.000006762201,0.0016683943,0.001730066,0.024938686,0.000108580185,0.028421363,0.18379332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007807306,0.00031132874,0.969685,0.000030566425,0.00024808294,0.000004843462,0.00068022084,0.015901372,0.005036637,0.00022733095,0.006741942,0.00035195076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013113688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000108477425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4939977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015832581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029120225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114412364","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060361","title":"A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-2003","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Bibliometrics; Epidemiology; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Productivity; Population; Public health; Medicine; Library science; Demography; Environmental health; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Pathology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.17050704488506438,"score_gpt":0.46847860204473923,"score_spread":0.2979715571596748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114412364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94487375,0.0035360886,0.0023262752,0.03667165,0.0011376553,0.0002636142,0.00028618486,0.000012815105,0.010891988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968936,0.00065583346,0.00015453005,0.00053594355,0.0003549625,0.0000075841485,0.000049992716,0.0000093749695,0.0013382128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95727754,0.0015923675,0.001974909,0.0006387666,0.03686296,0.0016534808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97491795,0.006787467,0.00060537667,0.0004919901,0.013788476,0.003408749],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12086655,0.00016529272,0.00066869997,0.8222002,0.00039334391,0.002830875,0.002891382,0.0008741923,0.008266821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16683412,0.00012610039,0.0003378965,0.95288885,0.00029316611,0.0007523673,0.00019443283,0.00250053,0.00009012654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040289165,0.00012663867,0.5705132,0.0000017071039,0.00006546249,0.00014961831,0.000016727343,0.000013259067,0.0000040970276,0.00009602742,0.40167272,0.02733653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009686653,0.00012858257,0.8026571,0.000023009203,0.000020424875,0.000034799174,0.00028569167,0.0073692743,0.000009191417,0.004799056,0.1835213,0.00018289387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07439864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06960815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23214392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016407938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051103435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115701185","doi":"10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x","title":"History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Factor (programming language); Data science; Library science; Operations research; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6874658205142047,"score_gpt":0.5792682361347077,"score_spread":0.108197584379497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115701185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750594,0.012934373,0.0008045767,0.0007212727,0.0016288704,0.00016331048,0.000028931012,0.000012158176,0.008647101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953232,0.0006607349,0.00035919508,0.00017156308,0.000045123197,3.211648e-7,1.7124403e-7,0.000004073224,0.003435623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498774,0.00036803505,0.00080786046,0.00040226686,0.0127982125,0.0006359106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897329,0.0036259028,0.00074771885,0.0006658464,0.004657912,0.0005696746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02947145,0.0001613262,0.00035172785,0.08029769,0.00031147437,0.0011072627,0.0031542212,0.00009922497,0.00041323982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07822573,0.00007991691,0.00023243073,0.2551544,0.0012612247,0.0007456327,0.00043384198,0.00038774623,0.000017634518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024156012,0.00014280627,0.57381636,0.0000038788457,0.000017969796,0.000006182272,0.001584694,0.000026673124,0.017097304,0.00088516745,0.06077237,0.34562242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029848487,0.00038146615,0.95722824,0.000008484637,0.000007951964,0.00007679209,0.0003609042,0.00060483033,0.0012664278,0.0056630895,0.033955745,0.00014755432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053374173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041045673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3834119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000628156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011596772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115743893","doi":"10.1134/s1810232815010075","title":"Top cited articles in thermodynamic research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Citation; Library science; Web of science; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6925626386382536,"score_gpt":0.5766574159429673,"score_spread":0.11590522269528636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115743893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99306476,0.0005018546,0.0044195997,0.00035150442,0.0004193896,0.0000668849,0.0000015909229,0.0000075182643,0.0011669018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.000037969075,0.0010339429,0.000013885523,0.00019619179,0.0000013090091,1.401985e-7,0.000014059578,0.00014022028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159384,0.00023306304,0.0006930957,0.000193157,0.0068138335,0.00047302083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926387,0.002535303,0.00018545646,0.0003993676,0.0038635528,0.00037761917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029539151,0.00009777192,0.00028625524,0.03024587,0.000035054574,0.00062621897,0.0016370416,0.00006987799,0.000030137673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02196247,0.00006614087,0.00011202059,0.094254546,0.0000611795,0.0005349408,0.00024993182,0.00066293275,0.000072478186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047631186,0.0014926773,0.07343592,0.000024225492,0.00014106366,0.0009104558,0.006901724,0.17897218,0.22142646,0.02078821,0.011286996,0.4841438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024753937,0.0010599717,0.24577282,0.00010704476,0.000008196116,0.00008325284,0.0023676192,0.6065868,0.006544583,0.12828538,0.006266131,0.00044278993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021534755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017341689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.483701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002414568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025942095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116637846","doi":"10.12927/hcq..17051","title":"CIHR Research: Re-Inventing the Microscope: The Canadian Light Source (CLS)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Light Source (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"CLs upper limits; Microscope; Optometry; Political science; Medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.6957410268992016,"score_gpt":0.6106040493027894,"score_spread":0.08513697759641214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116637846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22965428,0.006152352,0.0001695116,0.74207675,0.0011499859,0.0011779851,0.000045239394,0.00005709206,0.019516815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98491925,0.000070462826,0.00017845309,0.004351491,0.0008162595,0.000048642814,0.000003045804,0.000025882628,0.009586492],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98211807,0.0024095457,0.0010101937,0.0009720614,0.01125121,0.0022389162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850662,0.0063609886,0.0002452034,0.0022503657,0.0047213025,0.0013559753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07204054,0.00020362102,0.00028593908,0.022226991,0.005084193,0.0069611836,0.0054996917,0.00021517777,0.00064296724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010164331,0.00010116263,0.00019298779,0.1122076,0.0004850499,0.00047993532,0.00026512935,0.0016222477,0.0037230093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011282662,0.000036482612,0.010246165,0.000008232012,0.000009067545,0.000014515379,0.0072231567,0.0000057158377,0.0001273961,0.0021934612,0.27419028,0.7059342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015982958,0.0003021574,0.018657388,0.000018489602,0.0000019405045,0.000017863213,0.010806452,0.0011585463,0.00016062238,0.0031055752,0.96546537,0.00014574411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20486681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75346416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077085197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024835553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117442262","doi":"10.1093/carcin/bgm129","title":"A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in cancer molecular epidemiology","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carcinogenesis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epidemiology; Population; Ranking (information retrieval); European union; Medicine; Geography; Demography; Environmental health; Pathology; Business; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.5861870334913493,"score_gpt":0.582801078536854,"score_spread":0.0033859549544952294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117442262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844127,0.0092200115,0.0044653886,0.00032718357,0.0008351736,0.00021779758,0.000029614563,0.000011490687,0.00048061222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851704,0.0002622297,0.00064655714,0.00005514059,0.000036944195,0.000015066892,0.0000070445453,0.000009076118,0.00045088463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905377,0.00050826406,0.001576907,0.0012703821,0.005205526,0.0009012139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800665,0.005554834,0.00052567676,0.0012297,0.0043281186,0.00035500497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08729813,0.00015363048,0.00080523983,0.91915244,0.00013065756,0.00023915469,0.0016290478,0.00015702636,0.00038268478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08917611,0.00011723761,0.00041287707,0.9814319,0.00040864528,0.00028781116,0.00036276213,0.00015311554,0.000033865006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017145332,0.00009238585,0.78827685,0.000004679397,0.00007490427,0.000009519441,0.00004583182,0.0016275796,0.020103216,0.00013657285,0.00033577808,0.18927553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012261089,0.00003567449,0.95773876,0.0000035223952,0.000089057925,0.0000011322907,0.0001008532,0.0021792767,0.03809518,0.00080328336,0.0007107744,0.00011988952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010599184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066951575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18915564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002358075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023492987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117743583","doi":"10.3390/publications3010001","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges: DOAJ Survey May 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.9376723983932759,"score_gpt":0.7260669036513111,"score_spread":0.21160549474196477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117743583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5206203,0.0021522145,0.057255324,0.09324934,0.0011198003,0.0020065662,0.00039224458,0.000283557,0.32292068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289156,0.00003754745,0.0010341303,0.000418752,0.000066010434,0.00010745173,0.000039020357,0.000011464015,0.015394055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99279547,0.00037743436,0.0005757811,0.00072379917,0.0049929973,0.0005345485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98560417,0.0020235095,0.00028668146,0.0012565638,0.009878152,0.0009509139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040267523,0.000104061735,0.00020494862,0.022333993,0.00039198925,0.036364604,0.01120316,0.00006946562,0.0018278436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08924416,0.00007442351,0.000045564855,0.19328359,0.00012597488,0.0066822837,0.0038607386,0.00017243953,0.0031225388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003861304,0.00012293426,0.5177503,6.730832e-7,0.0000026493199,1.8735157e-7,0.00005838463,0.000008880932,0.000027647067,0.0014845226,0.43807456,0.04246537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021619537,0.000013313823,0.7482784,0.0000014095043,0.0000015223368,0.0000015879667,0.00011534348,0.004099663,0.00015670453,0.0088657355,0.23814373,0.00010641061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009943005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023974178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4622713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011059313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009901315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118089643","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.101","title":"Improving the International Influence of Chinese Academic Journals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Business; Public relations; International trade; Law","score_opus":0.39091432082969024,"score_gpt":0.5287340650515185,"score_spread":0.1378197442218283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118089643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98111826,0.003403675,0.002539799,0.008312625,0.0013362654,0.00006945296,0.0000065102863,0.0000035407902,0.0032098445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965154,0.0004029145,0.0018317992,0.0005967785,0.00032036926,7.060349e-7,1.4197263e-7,0.0000086536875,0.00032321666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764895,0.0005942877,0.0023292846,0.00029534966,0.019855369,0.00043624948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557746,0.0077233207,0.0038774787,0.00060954894,0.03147076,0.0005443004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15194057,0.00013150767,0.0003575967,0.034237824,0.0002837599,0.07086129,0.009372518,0.00020923415,0.0002946454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6464418,0.00006567073,0.00029080483,0.0721408,0.00013494387,0.0962071,0.0007207411,0.0037585862,0.0000143931875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021639915,0.00004548981,0.9206646,0.0000025266231,0.000038280727,0.000016705317,0.00035216802,0.00063250767,0.0341491,0.0012173817,0.0059144646,0.036945153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000929951,0.00013871762,0.9130769,0.00006832028,0.000011702865,0.0005477015,0.0013390636,0.0006491431,0.00224727,0.048021566,0.03281012,0.0001595653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004042144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025955942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49450126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017148521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080822536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119312080","doi":"10.1002/smj.508","title":"Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Licensee; Exploit; License; Commercialization; Incentive; Sample (material); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.6182492280077356,"score_gpt":0.485778950588266,"score_spread":0.13247027741946965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119312080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69185597,0.0073214113,0.004734606,0.0040965406,0.00056550896,0.0008032805,0.0000101820215,0.000020612004,0.29059193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475884,0.003599265,0.0007314838,0.000019340492,0.00012457509,0.0000034783482,4.1522208e-7,0.000004658244,0.0007579598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970695,0.00037114252,0.00043151554,0.0002333158,0.0015611361,0.00033340955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971556,0.0013331964,0.00028898823,0.00029244018,0.00079941767,0.00013037311],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016622772,0.00010181388,0.00017167484,0.009712236,0.0010573303,0.0021258632,0.0011676461,0.000025835741,0.00005792031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026124428,0.000052340587,0.0001727312,0.022311028,0.0003009644,0.0006627969,0.00042394214,0.00028684395,0.000008853615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005716904,0.000060671337,0.0011849744,0.000013529037,0.00008963024,0.0000040139544,0.001339002,0.000299213,0.000051113864,0.92890716,0.00044719642,0.06754636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018204245,0.000067759975,0.0019179285,0.000050162278,0.0000612946,0.000021616972,0.13393082,0.03999027,0.00006465046,0.7950251,0.0269278,0.00012217002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018523568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038363138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30290288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053719126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008521445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119342649","doi":"10.1002/asi.23347","title":"A lead‐lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Popularity; Lag; Time lag; Computer science; Regression analysis; Data science; Information retrieval; Machine learning; Psychology","score_opus":0.3331102629529904,"score_gpt":0.5118160362094799,"score_spread":0.1787057732564895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119342649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582981,0.000039611066,0.021224804,0.019092092,0.00038008246,0.00034229681,0.00004863117,0.0000049815944,0.0005694286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991538,0.0000148953095,0.00040151883,0.000063999025,0.0000094476245,0.000007870693,3.9212145e-7,6.797078e-7,0.00034741595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963993,0.000036136626,0.00059184385,0.0000940173,0.002730888,0.00014783951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98401207,0.00078145636,0.0015571028,0.00028250364,0.013306684,0.000060167884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023671238,0.000037691978,0.00015214908,0.018450243,0.0003038283,0.0004701195,0.0012600118,0.00007817177,0.0000022606876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11095788,0.000019297075,0.000089354566,0.069566526,0.00019652446,0.0017939819,0.00032690028,0.00009367007,0.0000011482301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005717895,0.00001701447,0.9501926,0.0000026148402,0.000042577056,2.8791776e-9,0.00033844286,0.00008004624,0.00026776787,0.02437589,0.0017500094,0.022927366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005159273,0.00007640044,0.9168852,0.000004586324,0.00007882046,0.0000036703848,0.0018404601,0.019281648,0.0015570816,0.035060097,0.024651233,0.00004486224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008580152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013637826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08728664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029024555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042352473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99267477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119582208","doi":"10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408","title":"New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; World Wide Web; Promotion (chess); Social media; Download; Audience measurement; Relevance (law); Metadata; Webometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Business; Advertising; Political science","score_opus":0.27997722570051914,"score_gpt":0.4548905511283122,"score_spread":0.1749133254277931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119582208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86000484,0.00025496283,0.01868275,0.11412139,0.000379049,0.0022199894,0.000061041705,0.000028317876,0.0042476724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97741014,0.0002083066,0.02038852,0.0013996909,0.000016887514,0.00009242709,0.0000014036366,0.0000026873056,0.00047993028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630404,0.000023042534,0.00061880564,0.0001626276,0.0026036263,0.0002878491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991926,0.002535852,0.00081515015,0.0005627415,0.004108915,0.00005135161],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011889579,0.00007083101,0.00022683748,0.00747503,0.0003030926,0.000469738,0.0026473417,0.00005119088,0.00000887984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025081959,0.000036229376,0.00013878946,0.07776936,0.0029299585,0.00045709714,0.00044052248,0.00009850155,0.0000024603487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001365724,0.00003514417,0.011235442,0.000024828518,0.00001128283,6.710332e-8,0.0015321523,0.000008196368,0.0012405304,0.033372596,0.2813722,0.6711539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004592468,0.00050871243,0.03430653,0.000009637609,0.000007753183,0.0000073073998,0.062689975,0.0009052763,0.0040049427,0.019369263,0.8776104,0.00012094515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034302403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019672239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67103297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003620351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120346313","doi":"","title":"Issues and challenges to development of institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Elpub digital library","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Institutional repository; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Open research; World Wide Web; Public relations; Knowledge management; Institutional research; Political science; Library science; Higher education; Publishing","score_opus":0.7150055971970769,"score_gpt":0.5527936526054816,"score_spread":0.16221194459159527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120346313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728554,0.010667004,0.000017093695,0.0025834078,0.00009130442,0.00018292978,0.000028966035,0.000011630974,0.013562291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945623,0.0035002134,0.0012831917,0.000020456284,0.000040303312,0.000017556402,0.0000055170763,0.0000046695804,0.000565772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559236,0.00009270069,0.0006271275,0.00048957,0.0028438112,0.00035442066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980346,0.0012263777,0.000050659433,0.00021665415,0.00020622564,0.0002654905],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030276335,0.00009124407,0.00021805684,0.026370998,0.00021560393,0.00063207257,0.00065672514,0.000105857805,0.0000138427595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082386965,0.00007134865,0.000016916289,0.042949274,0.0005603228,0.0033226034,0.0013684991,0.00030200274,0.000022187518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043589862,0.00011517015,0.8931286,0.000016470985,0.0000034273264,0.00006139282,0.0030295267,0.0000095792375,0.00020522535,0.0079093445,0.0009710482,0.09450667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019715754,0.000062454485,0.8894211,0.000045848297,1.05475245e-7,0.00002205975,0.0006998666,0.000019436093,0.0017963727,0.003999461,0.10363829,0.00009786004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012628666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015599435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10266724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035028363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007343865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120479835","doi":"10.5860/crln.69.8.8047","title":"Open access and evolving scholarly communication: An overview of library advocacy and commitment, institutional repositories, and publishing in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Strong","keywords":"Mandate; Library science; Publishing; Political science; Scholarly communication; Open access publishing; Best practice; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7746639874194271,"score_gpt":0.5715284349985625,"score_spread":0.20313555242086456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120479835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040359,0.062298134,0.00000937294,0.009884187,0.00012144732,0.00086313643,0.00017258052,0.000011935448,0.022603296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763688,0.019221192,0.0027526221,0.00032137922,0.000045051765,0.00004589544,0.000028729924,0.000013797588,0.0012025692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910855,0.001561071,0.0008444349,0.00077052653,0.0051787742,0.0005596852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883204,0.007822107,0.00022653141,0.0012219768,0.0016199845,0.0007889664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010810517,0.0001540938,0.00045402625,0.012686677,0.0016063142,0.0458619,0.0070930603,0.00011038906,0.00021055226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028001891,0.0001248059,0.000021339485,0.06641504,0.0012240065,0.08561797,0.019730657,0.00086617883,7.692465e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008167421,0.00007411095,0.8455382,0.000030036555,0.000009781647,0.00007708166,0.00045931552,0.0000018751101,0.000015726675,0.03292277,0.1072021,0.0135873305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009834886,0.00013751788,0.8267183,0.00008815343,0.0000015478631,0.00005222914,0.0035158922,0.0012279649,0.00015593154,0.023751521,0.1431985,0.00016897118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59718436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26548764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3316967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020508899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014583562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122566942","doi":"","title":"Biomedical scientific publication patterns in the Scopus database: a case study of Andalusia, Spain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Canadian Institute of Steel Construction","keywords":"Scopus; Biomedicine; Citation database; Citation; Visibility; MEDLINE; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; Biology; Bioinformatics; Law","score_opus":0.30993306132092124,"score_gpt":0.4466405571512866,"score_spread":0.13670749583036534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122566942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633086,0.00029349996,0.0011976275,0.0003634382,0.0004800792,0.00043871763,0.000055740496,0.0000123191985,0.00082769233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998486,0.000012375751,0.00033074478,0.0000139867825,0.000049730595,0.0000012932185,0.000017546417,0.000004941174,0.001083411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918815,0.0008359536,0.00052390655,0.0005640449,0.0057455543,0.00044906625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951654,0.0013916917,0.000509694,0.0011905825,0.0014474437,0.00029517364],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017584423,0.00012670577,0.00031584164,0.016521677,0.0012132282,0.0008347432,0.002497158,0.00009314626,0.00024143081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031927377,0.00009643009,0.00011374147,0.07366181,0.000479735,0.0015328618,0.0012889563,0.00024152662,0.000019343444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000795512,0.0067337174,0.8971659,0.00004068393,0.00005293173,0.0010446878,0.035496343,0.0000053820336,0.0062702144,0.00013941334,0.021294454,0.0316767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002219431,0.0010478875,0.48499092,0.00004027989,0.00004807292,0.0008674816,0.476469,0.0026828393,0.00047654897,0.000028689465,0.030784996,0.00034382363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055183065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006946675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44097266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012034969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023449023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122732631","doi":"10.1002/j.1681-4835.2003.tb00070.x","title":"E‐Publishing in Science and Healthcare: Alternative Models for Development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; SciELO; Publishing; Health care; Library science; Business model; Electronic library; Political science; Scientific publishing; Health science; Center (category theory); MEDLINE; Business; Medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Digital library; Marketing; Art","score_opus":0.2611843664851838,"score_gpt":0.4703095811214601,"score_spread":0.2091252146362763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122732631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5232988,0.009035994,0.455128,0.008824918,0.0013781295,0.0011085295,0.0000053503372,0.000008029719,0.0012122088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721456,0.0011757476,0.0012177277,0.00032928627,0.000021286505,0.000016919743,3.3300026e-7,0.0000031005122,0.000021025044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137986,0.00022459356,0.0017336811,0.00015294064,0.00577569,0.0007332133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98645025,0.0028027936,0.0010901768,0.00019762479,0.009353994,0.000105168256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12202691,0.00010233409,0.0002857561,0.023699595,0.0003518467,0.004595681,0.0014874861,0.00005678193,9.503538e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03172589,0.000061360945,0.000023381575,0.03701216,0.000174037,0.008919637,0.00013315168,0.00037888924,0.000002706556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043323584,0.0000071563622,0.0033927932,0.000034985085,0.000009619688,7.187131e-7,0.0072852345,0.0038414944,0.0000027919746,0.9728281,0.00035363086,0.012200161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035158235,0.0003147065,0.012092725,0.0005491325,0.0000039583892,0.00038412688,0.018627165,0.058772173,0.0015451299,0.26766962,0.63600713,0.0005183261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009507648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008526265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7051585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021164052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009257525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99643767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123012798","doi":"10.1123/jsep.25.4.477","title":"Publishing Productivity in Sport Psychology 1970–2000: An Exploratory Examination of the Lotka-Price Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Productivity; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sport psychology; Social science; Sports science; Applied psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.3202027184087833,"score_gpt":0.5006045020388501,"score_spread":0.18040178363006681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123012798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564965,0.0011462145,0.00011621796,0.0010096742,0.0015162776,0.00018034833,0.0000019764843,0.0000036837223,0.01037596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827516,0.00075438386,0.00043254552,0.0003022543,0.00009502842,0.0000035503992,7.1890895e-7,0.000010388759,0.00012597031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947663,0.00013770077,0.0013426245,0.0005503644,0.0027797911,0.00042322368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557954,0.00014320434,0.0011686247,0.000789846,0.002041934,0.00027687452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038477723,0.00015232075,0.0006154851,0.015118142,0.00011691226,0.00043476853,0.0015817037,0.00023558116,0.00012740456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014971865,0.0000953337,0.000125802,0.03660396,0.0004232246,0.0025901701,0.0001367878,0.0006875463,0.00000652539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002111327,0.000913407,0.912135,0.000008979393,0.000011727736,0.00007146983,0.0011286669,0.000015165391,0.0009565668,0.0043346374,0.0013119172,0.07890133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000835594,0.00024546336,0.9698791,0.000023083887,0.000010232448,0.0002044941,0.0006371785,0.000014645143,0.00062970375,0.006858218,0.020554373,0.00010793081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030909767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004729347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0787934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056162247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019934261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99604464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126151227","doi":"10.18438/b81s5w","title":"UK Library and Information Science Research is Having a Significant Influence on Research in Other Subject Disciplines","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Citation; Web of science; Information science; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Impact factor; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.3798485392327241,"score_gpt":0.5452735359162998,"score_spread":0.1654249966835757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126151227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81133235,0.0004487577,0.00087577285,0.131935,0.00023466296,0.0011836163,0.000041029318,0.0000863224,0.053862475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808892,0.0019999638,0.00176857,0.014995658,0.00006254845,0.00005311939,0.000006492743,0.000009132754,0.00021533557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849998,0.0019214329,0.001239405,0.0006526903,0.01023868,0.0009480216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422949,0.053649843,0.00052504794,0.0011379286,0.0017092635,0.00068304775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06584855,0.00019428985,0.00024852034,0.05893183,0.0012471448,0.016901478,0.0021884064,0.00015555946,0.00032454787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10789397,0.00014177096,0.000037881175,0.11867449,0.0012518835,0.5288067,0.0017323942,0.0011751199,0.00039217726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016408303,0.0001931498,0.18144202,0.00023448069,0.000006485069,0.000009104144,0.0026478192,0.0007741523,0.00090421695,0.53871787,0.008473742,0.26495612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000745398,0.0009771537,0.45014656,0.0005957791,0.0000032771284,0.00001197459,0.0040227803,0.059844032,0.007463423,0.006181154,0.46962318,0.00038529592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005034489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4178343e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53253675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044654458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010942424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98411906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126151262","doi":"10.1002/asi.23239","title":"How is research blogged? A content analysis approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Content analysis; Quarter (Canadian coin); Multidisciplinary approach; Value (mathematics); Sample (material); Visibility; Social media; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.5321372389782696,"score_gpt":0.5357945287418109,"score_spread":0.0036572897635412938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126151262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77837694,0.0002583462,0.052920252,0.15376417,0.0011043628,0.00082794024,0.000040217292,0.000027142303,0.01268062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973113,0.00004535633,0.0011513346,0.00026529576,0.00003177324,0.000004054873,3.2857275e-7,0.0000013370158,0.0011892276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875653,0.0001458738,0.00071801443,0.00017326401,0.010981888,0.00041571108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591873,0.0021929936,0.0015936248,0.00044056796,0.036448713,0.00013677985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10518562,0.00006287762,0.0002679008,0.07153963,0.00087660865,0.0035018139,0.0027839392,0.00014985196,0.000003812476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22237642,0.000033213713,0.00015554363,0.22427419,0.0005119889,0.0032733567,0.00050892285,0.00037590816,0.0000078641615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034238936,0.00011706274,0.46673536,0.0000105251465,0.00023585637,1.1505147e-7,0.0015802038,0.00011778538,0.0019948406,0.13568433,0.041353695,0.352136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001445492,0.00053589017,0.12858409,0.0000074281756,0.00010068422,0.000021407688,0.010488819,0.061288618,0.0074281157,0.06855934,0.72135156,0.00018856564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050404697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013815003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67999786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038794384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034446502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126658398","doi":"10.5539/mas.v8n5p63","title":"Equality of Google Scholar with Web of Science Citations: Case of Malaysian Engineering Highly Cited Papers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Funding Agency; Web of science; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Library science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.21761586769838356,"score_gpt":0.45915199111031924,"score_spread":0.24153612341193567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126658398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91737235,0.00003785333,0.071093924,0.00005363808,0.000087461056,0.00024009353,0.00002584701,0.000016898995,0.011071942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837287,0.0000055264627,0.016170647,0.000019178233,0.000008989215,0.000009571661,4.741129e-7,0.000007962874,0.00004896369],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98756987,0.00006722653,0.0009080334,0.00095863856,0.00982452,0.00067169685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99211246,0.0016828422,0.0005915088,0.0013009897,0.0038567618,0.00045546915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041604772,0.00016168163,0.00043009315,0.036158144,0.00045241366,0.0005370581,0.0035607917,0.000058751437,0.00004018574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017104477,0.000114159775,0.00006930777,0.21629827,0.004246149,0.000953948,0.00068381167,0.00023642085,0.000009130784],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021072936,0.000103597304,0.00609311,0.000023659655,0.000004122547,0.0000034446446,0.0004941095,0.0054442347,0.9436515,0.023546578,0.0000067683677,0.020607794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068314496,0.00026874998,0.03888999,0.000032525153,0.000009441871,0.00002989454,0.0010039746,0.730356,0.224777,0.0034402197,0.0002378126,0.00027126708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099882636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001432716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72491175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010155518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010775892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126660889","doi":"10.5072/prism/29774","title":"Open Access for the Australian Medical Librarian","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hispana","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Library science; Open access journal; Political science; Public access; Open access publishing; Public relations; Medical research; Business; Medicine; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.9082844322064981,"score_gpt":0.6852591581362585,"score_spread":0.22302527407023964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126660889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37589052,0.0025172096,0.053022552,0.38315946,0.0069741583,0.005077231,0.00025056966,0.00015966002,0.17294864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249535,0.00030753828,0.00075760705,0.001807925,0.00028376875,0.000058595895,0.0000042597085,0.000012786096,0.07181399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99110144,0.00011838808,0.00044174475,0.00053756614,0.007287501,0.0005133592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900636,0.0074085053,0.00013337174,0.0009525336,0.000848673,0.0005932897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013971938,0.00009698722,0.00021489692,0.010728615,0.0007891399,0.0068109254,0.019466711,0.000109729255,0.0076179113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040970493,0.000048721744,0.00012652481,0.08862504,0.00029811182,0.0018144436,0.004169556,0.00020928461,0.00047289243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016691682,0.000047542468,0.041096274,0.0000010137503,0.0000095108,0.000019354997,0.000050898623,0.000004149044,0.0000045250604,0.004796484,0.81603944,0.1379141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037401222,0.000045735716,0.18373884,0.0000024429664,0.0000024357528,0.000025234682,0.00006795866,0.0022730357,0.000091101916,0.0046250634,0.8086716,0.000082554725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049881765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014334444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.549063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036077356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008827378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126698449","doi":"10.22230/src.2014v5n4a195","title":"Introduction: \"Building Partnerships to Transform Scholarly Publishing\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6966302690756938,"score_gpt":0.5823378936665247,"score_spread":0.11429237540916914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126698449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43113777,0.0034534552,0.01670344,0.50998414,0.0004521125,0.00096232095,0.000014237614,0.00010625365,0.037186243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871563,0.00077549735,0.007838687,0.00043126382,0.000484286,0.00006261439,0.000011686021,0.000017509015,0.0032222096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97800237,0.004427779,0.00081945426,0.0010791558,0.014628363,0.0010428714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96597266,0.008975826,0.00014473905,0.0032303266,0.020368068,0.0013084025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20096445,0.00016127204,0.00028479597,0.035463177,0.0024948942,0.11415812,0.0064901155,0.0002776215,0.0003103984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32648548,0.00012242426,0.0000903049,0.105456226,0.00044897562,0.035524,0.0022885343,0.0033354997,0.0005357831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008490625,0.00013819683,0.014023744,0.000011138234,0.000016452228,0.0000010441752,0.0007264545,0.000013073392,0.0042574573,0.14148736,0.09936778,0.7398724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041640172,0.0002923941,0.034311835,0.000022314245,0.0000027210083,0.000008271408,0.0014240027,0.0010310056,0.0015869483,0.10970635,0.85101503,0.00018269724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018378743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014995057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021799831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021178283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127540269","doi":"10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2","title":"Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Personalization; Scientometrics; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.4692757887462023,"score_gpt":0.5425769812812546,"score_spread":0.07330119253505235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127540269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98823243,0.0013844221,0.0017214635,0.0012751675,0.000581145,0.0003995134,0.00001929888,0.0000057636976,0.0063808123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739397,0.0005067901,0.0014248671,0.0003692921,0.000026873797,0.000009082928,5.6057564e-7,0.0000054933867,0.0002630868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985712,0.0002854629,0.00069662236,0.00046134382,0.012101539,0.0007430388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795646,0.014024588,0.00046689576,0.0011850325,0.0045405985,0.00021827946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09023855,0.00012096726,0.00022197695,0.10341745,0.00063544017,0.0022955996,0.0038302557,0.000058905727,0.000051728264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12700452,0.00006180266,0.00006694698,0.64596534,0.0014442573,0.0026046094,0.0010652951,0.00028426966,0.00001637487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007152057,0.00023358721,0.95974296,0.000020600288,0.0000066779694,0.0000011344981,0.0013449047,0.000037570615,0.0010512193,0.012762531,0.0038914725,0.02090021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025386616,0.000040626255,0.9702234,0.000016239952,0.000008614816,0.0000030241615,0.002744947,0.0012616065,0.0006892487,0.0007508964,0.02391418,0.00009333761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018836274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003064539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5425479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053558713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018888933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128918317","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1110.1470","title":"Reconceptualizing Stars: Scientist Helpfulness and Peer Performance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; University of Toronto","keywords":"Helpfulness; Productivity; Receipt; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Entrepreneurship; Sociology; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5017412632498177,"score_gpt":0.5394137518965617,"score_spread":0.037672488646743996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128918317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9266013,0.0003283375,0.003184355,0.0005857513,0.0015590793,0.00025328182,0.0000045492834,0.000034826226,0.067448534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810155,0.00009418524,0.0032008584,0.00020755958,0.000074611904,0.000015731948,6.991519e-7,0.0000066083153,0.015384271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834258,0.00008351531,0.0004666422,0.0009276226,0.01378492,0.0013114834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996457,0.0004759754,0.00016608815,0.00086587097,0.0013259649,0.0007091029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057530705,0.00015339229,0.00019172645,0.028662242,0.001240916,0.0043407003,0.0031873856,0.000035316334,0.0004983957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005805647,0.000110401954,0.000044987715,0.1378544,0.0015663103,0.004325893,0.002659436,0.000149163,0.0006777719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049342248,0.00009090921,0.5178037,0.000014565261,0.0000049730816,0.0000037094228,0.00056249986,0.000018958292,0.00040099816,0.012571034,0.010182165,0.4583415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549304,0.000045617755,0.8355826,0.000013092929,0.000005086492,0.000009108279,0.0021132238,0.00409408,0.0019618135,0.0006189823,0.15505137,0.00025009943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015715292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018961341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45809144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014680058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005321107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128959152","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0000","title":"Surviving Referees' Reports","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Media studies; Sociology; Slavic languages; Social science; History; Library science; Classics; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.7110167972722886,"score_gpt":0.5385857244027762,"score_spread":0.17243107286951243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128959152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95689857,0.0021829053,0.0036690256,0.005782422,0.00241932,0.000066633904,0.0000029831301,0.00001541049,0.028962744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908741,0.0002657155,0.004799633,0.0003565873,0.00061269227,5.628183e-7,6.1052265e-7,0.000013942256,0.003076129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705828,0.000544184,0.0023883672,0.00048925524,0.025370928,0.0006244926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541607,0.0053340513,0.0027044448,0.001027959,0.03563078,0.0011420698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13417986,0.0001435547,0.0004851302,0.06344842,0.00058366597,0.1104982,0.0041430164,0.00023564123,0.0004735006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5040732,0.000094874726,0.0003344159,0.11541018,0.00011284376,0.14278956,0.00090428843,0.002457187,0.00005092217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016635839,0.00009299045,0.79164606,0.0000017645867,0.000024379255,0.0016642069,0.00026462908,0.000034981273,0.0012259788,0.00029414977,0.16133177,0.04340243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004540179,0.00019956152,0.7392214,0.000032245,0.0000069183366,0.006383168,0.00065533275,0.00012684727,0.0004459396,0.012265584,0.24001183,0.00019717876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095797106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009043299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36989334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002377719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090532727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129049984","doi":"10.18438/b88609","title":"For Non-expert Clinical Searches, Google Scholar Results are Older with Higher Impact while PubMed Results Offer More Breadth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Scopus; Information retrieval; Quality (philosophy); Statistic; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Computer science; Cohen's kappa; Medicine; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3827512911107469,"score_gpt":0.5158131576038543,"score_spread":0.13306186649310736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129049984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20805092,0.0025115937,0.00718522,0.75048625,0.0012415614,0.007317089,0.0012609768,0.0002950047,0.021651382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89637107,0.003809087,0.028990297,0.060923953,0.0006086691,0.0005898935,0.0003121508,0.000043098666,0.008351808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918086,0.00070369226,0.0016493585,0.00069469225,0.0044048666,0.00073879986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96086884,0.03241001,0.0014365292,0.001251004,0.0029542735,0.0010793251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026133722,0.00025905634,0.0003967715,0.008433242,0.00050830125,0.009880403,0.0014056045,0.00024643625,0.0005418339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10982499,0.00015478545,0.00015812049,0.030974833,0.00023858441,0.2730275,0.00044162318,0.00074127887,0.00038858957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005225164,0.00027519852,0.02131783,0.00003878996,0.000053429176,0.000007532028,0.00021779544,0.000112105794,0.000013583719,0.00055208785,0.796984,0.17520246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018522533,0.0004903036,0.49873573,0.000084354935,0.0000074673094,0.0000072451403,0.0004935256,0.0076594343,0.00021120091,0.000051707604,0.4902208,0.00018601597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008490416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4396537e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6895623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045960966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000651154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99114746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129137558","doi":"10.1186/s40463-014-0047-1","title":"The Canadian contribution to the otolaryngology literature: A five year bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Stornoway Diamond (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Otorhinolaryngology; Bibliometrics; Regional science; Library science; Geography; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.11073153825420616,"score_gpt":0.4180188855901482,"score_spread":0.30728734733594204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129137558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763222,0.005500885,0.00090650795,0.015549504,0.0011520177,0.00019795039,0.000024485083,0.000005453775,0.00034103874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961968,0.0014577653,0.000117917836,0.0015835167,0.00033123887,0.000007878793,0.000005226254,0.000008928791,0.00029073813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925883,0.0015473699,0.00130192,0.00045420238,0.0031622099,0.00094600697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96929574,0.022813244,0.000736365,0.0007296065,0.00530811,0.0011169431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04807858,0.0001988822,0.0008585523,0.41098416,0.0012828563,0.0025558376,0.0016866189,0.00029588956,0.00009775893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08439697,0.00009531209,0.0005587881,0.65025026,0.00030680565,0.00047718178,0.00028192424,0.0008254134,0.000113629605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011082293,0.000037980568,0.9504874,0.0000024462856,0.0002339819,0.00011447634,0.00009426265,0.000028934777,0.000030452848,0.0011626033,0.0354766,0.01222005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023566952,0.0002215471,0.8464206,0.000011301483,0.000058638256,0.0002445305,0.000019953108,0.0007695622,0.000023614868,0.0011781586,0.1507145,0.000101902675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025404892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02794779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2392661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014194459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000626974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129275633","doi":"10.22230/ijepl.2009v4n3a164","title":"A Quantitative Analysis of Countries’ Research Strengths","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Conceptual framework; Comparative research; Scarcity; Field (mathematics); Regional science; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.84298480473564,"score_gpt":0.7047405077329202,"score_spread":0.13824429700271978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129275633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92312706,0.0030194453,0.0013298773,0.064124264,0.0006998487,0.000084723455,0.000038737253,0.000002730413,0.007573313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651575,0.0003924414,0.0006172982,0.00074492954,0.00030692044,6.23251e-7,0.0000027062993,0.0000022322185,0.0014170811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919404,0.00037260534,0.00082338817,0.00018936535,0.006443422,0.00023084883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97649956,0.00787401,0.00062229193,0.00019177493,0.014579277,0.00023310943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015394367,0.00006926182,0.00026395966,0.09246704,0.0000790774,0.00070519885,0.0013739205,0.000062810206,0.00032355078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06144657,0.000050368617,0.00016583622,0.054275706,0.00025363898,0.00056716433,0.000056238016,0.0002865283,0.000016490103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006051408,0.0012499202,0.07866418,0.000008588422,0.0011618988,0.000011940193,0.011061038,0.00031687753,0.0013462985,0.49325588,0.03972333,0.3725949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072885025,0.0012062404,0.8017617,0.00007029967,0.00010900274,0.00004212567,0.038660575,0.002319813,0.0010698743,0.09406596,0.059778202,0.00018739366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014838368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016646783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7230975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015958188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014056193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129998450","doi":"10.5860/crln.74.9.9009","title":"Making your publications open access: Resources to assist researchers and librarians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.9163693574320282,"score_gpt":0.6759432609013435,"score_spread":0.2404260965306847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129998450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24814126,0.002613712,0.0011258601,0.26303706,0.00036050827,0.0062624216,0.0003659308,0.00019928382,0.47789395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72940236,0.0004637602,0.015105771,0.0031652506,0.0004954324,0.0019049343,0.000023099778,0.00011741822,0.24932195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97834617,0.002489224,0.0011794912,0.0020755166,0.013575005,0.0023346143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587774,0.024410661,0.00033348074,0.0040559135,0.008441983,0.0039805146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031138867,0.00031764133,0.00062253856,0.06948231,0.002843014,0.17074981,0.024481032,0.00027020302,0.010317037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14320593,0.00023518119,0.00012955876,0.26921788,0.001420135,0.025203912,0.03975231,0.0013109423,0.0021533107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007547805,0.00013410462,0.066174015,0.000009675069,0.000023319108,0.000014682808,0.0006849089,0.000003545356,0.00014497279,0.044399843,0.79960316,0.08873232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041117644,0.00024930388,0.19472742,0.000024741965,0.0000018379549,0.000005968225,0.010510041,0.00088471314,0.00012786382,0.08856964,0.70422524,0.00026206337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028868853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004644367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4812611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021299758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002335246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130456849","doi":"10.1002/asi.23266","title":"Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":476,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Citation impact; Citation; Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.09452104728685203,"score_gpt":0.4709480457491031,"score_spread":0.3764269984622511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130456849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95436275,0.00009645064,0.002057073,0.041047323,0.0011353473,0.00031830493,0.000023216926,0.000013503734,0.0009460356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860615,0.000020640398,0.0007023781,0.00030309954,0.00002787993,0.0000027759638,3.0740938e-7,0.0000015843954,0.0003352083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939998,0.00006302089,0.0007015918,0.00015120859,0.004802477,0.0002819202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798831,0.002257262,0.0018081538,0.0002960492,0.0156230945,0.00013234427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04478531,0.00006966144,0.00018199591,0.017533036,0.0009188878,0.0044825315,0.001277642,0.00010775453,0.000004918641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15824994,0.00003841346,0.00005430923,0.07626156,0.000531306,0.005249659,0.00030293845,0.00016676878,0.000011763392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062596344,0.00008401227,0.41381207,0.000017619152,0.000045693734,1.4091678e-7,0.0017655304,0.00017654231,0.01658686,0.06297118,0.11486678,0.38961095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017388759,0.00067192444,0.26005116,0.000025350095,0.000026630603,0.000059213333,0.0028081604,0.02270033,0.0072184466,0.081728265,0.6227462,0.00022542589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031019933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036655229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50787944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038489312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055635674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131590703","doi":"10.1139/juvs-2015-0022","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.843790549603968,"score_gpt":0.6485680902265646,"score_spread":0.19522245937740346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131590703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98560214,0.0013270866,0.0054299263,0.0011663673,0.0027573374,0.00054202473,0.000013374199,0.000007773729,0.003153959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966372,0.00001641364,0.00045444694,0.000054757395,0.00050766295,0.00000814224,3.140143e-7,0.00001428129,0.0023067421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937274,0.00029650025,0.0011569203,0.00035457793,0.004034219,0.00043039737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907524,0.0022808537,0.00092762714,0.0003643275,0.0048694382,0.0008053566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03650656,0.00013044509,0.0005396246,0.016422417,0.00020601545,0.0140876975,0.004121865,0.00010226516,0.0000124242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022426264,0.00008175948,0.00011120217,0.025265789,0.000055167395,0.003719655,0.0014924029,0.00023085036,0.00001577157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013038563,0.00029782645,0.6716957,0.000185964,0.00027331567,0.00014451609,0.0018842506,0.0045300075,0.0037280745,0.0024081904,0.1759639,0.13758437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013943919,0.003709647,0.3416389,0.0006150092,0.00009571297,0.00085047696,0.007117308,0.13462219,0.0039886045,0.02384956,0.46844512,0.0011235444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020022687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010006657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33005685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026010294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99545264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132320854","doi":"10.1177/0146167210378111","title":"Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Personality; Citation; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.4917584739567817,"score_gpt":0.5813574088282103,"score_spread":0.08959893487142861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132320854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97949517,0.00027550326,0.000174767,0.014181009,0.00020721035,0.000270443,0.00016067125,0.000017664195,0.005217585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985499,0.00006509518,0.00028248693,0.0005100455,0.000126822,0.000014106125,0.00001649084,0.000011093312,0.00042397776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958921,0.00075787486,0.000569727,0.0009118943,0.0013466302,0.00052177045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965695,0.0015230158,0.000369533,0.00023750472,0.0010490246,0.0002514265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012421759,0.00023587017,0.00058563723,0.0031220976,0.0006242459,0.00037936307,0.00047583994,0.0004769838,0.0014379185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024740945,0.0001716184,0.00021387007,0.008055835,0.0024927955,0.00013684643,0.00020541376,0.00065595144,0.000010775054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051051873,0.00057075685,0.7597048,0.00004175129,0.00023559915,0.000006334167,0.037767354,2.9335263e-7,0.0045874426,0.0070518744,0.015897568,0.17362565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009976457,0.00028004477,0.96380305,0.0000018620711,0.000010695218,0.00001305148,0.0030577972,0.00008464093,0.000009055341,0.0073251487,0.02423009,0.00018694176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010411479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025235274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20409818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002749372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006437623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132406724","doi":"","title":"Amiante et conflits d'intérêts : l'Université McGill pointée du doigt","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07837236158268163,"score_gpt":0.3153571081214496,"score_spread":0.236984746538768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132406724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.706617,0.046023175,0.0015327209,0.030136537,0.0045158733,0.0009927782,0.00050193135,0.00016482017,0.20951518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77505636,0.004831409,0.0011744357,0.0008996005,0.00020003057,0.000012418224,0.000025981726,0.00003155589,0.21776824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945683,0.0007094692,0.00084686646,0.0014593141,0.0060763415,0.0014511602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906131,0.001891422,0.00054354116,0.0010791713,0.0040164166,0.0018563287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038500794,0.0005602885,0.00064739597,0.015019377,0.009570464,0.00125499,0.0027872291,0.00057385914,0.0027134446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028308176,0.0005579682,0.00060492393,0.03336138,0.0012365371,0.0030634743,0.0024082602,0.0008558557,0.0042255656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006465294,0.0017481225,0.13156593,0.00014164331,0.00078091974,0.012394495,0.014538559,0.0029087933,0.016123759,0.26994225,0.18123002,0.367979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019645845,0.00030628752,0.18968108,0.00012029474,0.00009484915,0.0016154754,0.010688116,0.012007462,0.002801033,0.0028552855,0.77710795,0.00075759285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096086055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021373658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59587795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077685295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022730972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132478289","doi":"10.5596/c06-025","title":"Open access for the medical librarian","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Publishing; Open access journal; Library science; Medical library; World Wide Web; Medical journal; Open access publishing; Relevance (law); Point (geometry); Computer science; Institutional repository; Political science; Public relations; Business; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.13510952248644426,"score_gpt":0.4922088215085776,"score_spread":0.35709929902213333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132478289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101320244,0.06330719,0.007084895,0.80571735,0.009365654,0.001728786,0.0010659497,0.000030101242,0.010379823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317312,0.009200764,0.001954173,0.045219854,0.0052099903,0.000017973243,0.000009065791,0.000056475325,0.0066005085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345107,0.0039386246,0.0020620006,0.00026678853,0.008682324,0.0015991958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94090605,0.044243284,0.006876832,0.0004876553,0.004917665,0.0025685334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08979346,0.0002127687,0.0006023919,0.004309271,0.0029056254,0.034291036,0.009772004,0.00048402906,0.0007994856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15847899,0.00012883286,0.0003924352,0.01652471,0.00008578477,0.0037997651,0.00063671864,0.0016307271,0.0000021937744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019748315,0.000023098073,0.361406,0.000003854926,0.00008104358,0.00003087734,0.00012025058,0.00021836067,8.8120805e-7,0.0022238242,0.6313234,0.00454869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063168816,0.000047855632,0.3683347,0.000028619343,0.000020130885,0.00028263047,0.00021306028,0.0013953673,0.000019321933,0.02640953,0.60250497,0.00011213929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53483534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7988592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83041096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023842001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14077021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132615533","doi":"10.1002/asi.20349","title":"The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Natural science; Citation index; Citation; Science Citation Index; Social science; Index (typography); The arts; Digital humanities; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Social Sciences Citation Index; Library science; Sociology; Humanities; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2802135795098643,"score_gpt":0.4847581285676076,"score_spread":0.20454454905774327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132615533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953043,0.00040042875,0.00016537648,0.0037394068,0.000073843745,0.00011358935,0.000001856142,0.0000039871175,0.00019719715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968065,0.0001924588,0.0028888516,0.000082643375,0.000017430355,0.000002274214,3.497029e-8,0.0000011737488,0.000008609317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966777,0.000027054246,0.0005481834,0.00013526046,0.0023324802,0.00027934264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428993,0.0019609788,0.0019771538,0.00009659831,0.001650492,0.000024855119],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021178816,0.00007076069,0.00023232581,0.005429512,0.0013895062,0.0014790497,0.0012060286,0.00002790762,2.3772908e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009161904,0.00003278094,0.00003626956,0.041962195,0.007014023,0.002738237,0.0003946512,0.0001952862,7.257341e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025691738,0.00009866897,0.55102897,0.000121407305,0.000080871214,0.0000012328303,0.01170226,0.0018581348,0.03741667,0.1973272,0.003427963,0.19667971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002141481,0.0025014982,0.6369707,0.0001661279,0.00004123221,0.00044787012,0.2087575,0.09776947,0.008233329,0.013513653,0.028967353,0.0004897672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101802245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039307764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19705525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005978278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044339764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991053},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2132781897","doi":"10.1007/s10961-011-9238-3","title":"Visualizing nanotechnology research in Canada: evidence from publication activities, 1990–2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Technology Transfer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Bibliometrics; Regional science; Commercial law; Political science; Nanotechnology; Geography; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6982587638005132,"score_gpt":0.5440037586826795,"score_spread":0.15425500511783374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132781897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97664964,0.004551541,0.003889627,0.014101348,0.00027671977,0.00016221589,0.000011152405,0.000015021133,0.0003427383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733275,0.001956497,0.0005338463,0.00007228806,0.000028839446,0.000006123591,2.2993228e-7,0.0000094591505,0.00005996819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916183,0.00074585795,0.0011458595,0.00035300863,0.005401628,0.0007353778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903587,0.0056825005,0.00020204976,0.00093713816,0.0026816477,0.0001379668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033323165,0.00012764195,0.00039170755,0.05552105,0.000219755,0.00016747061,0.0059723933,0.00029994978,0.00038337143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015885651,0.00007473887,0.000073053336,0.114216246,0.0006244853,0.0007885997,0.00036517135,0.0018683897,0.00003109325],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049308303,0.000318636,0.25533503,0.000006973514,0.000086136206,0.00021861361,0.0013770113,0.000015732054,0.06006232,0.005226816,0.009839298,0.6670204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020402244,0.002341531,0.29948643,0.00037469063,0.000052075553,0.00050581136,0.024330148,0.001188867,0.45488882,0.18250771,0.031641293,0.00064238824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36061236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3549425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66637796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066926336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022473277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132832845","doi":"10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.026","title":"Trends in otolaryngology research during the period 1995‐2000: A bibliometric approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otolaryngology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Gross domestic product; Bibliometrics; Population; Geography; Library science; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.40841027301130944,"score_gpt":0.5321889137873425,"score_spread":0.12377864077603301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132832845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93572414,0.004177189,0.0003299656,0.005854165,0.00034764828,0.0005418955,0.000022340177,0.000058330184,0.05294434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852044,0.00031482286,0.0012539992,0.00028809893,0.00042099692,0.00022114273,0.000011832482,0.00004026259,0.012244454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98011076,0.003374025,0.0016428047,0.002108082,0.009866306,0.0028980197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882186,0.0064145043,0.00029861176,0.0023957407,0.0020662672,0.0006062647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053663135,0.00037700406,0.0008462492,0.6783282,0.0010287458,0.001934716,0.0070645036,0.0005963424,0.0032842555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023511939,0.00023857043,0.00033905215,0.8440805,0.0012650513,0.0010080087,0.002607066,0.0023677598,0.0018791268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018757179,0.00096818735,0.7609788,0.000016489294,0.000041700794,0.00026695876,0.0012656103,0.00030761657,0.0020943822,0.002574074,0.015170249,0.21612833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001154535,0.00022969648,0.889256,0.0000040634523,0.0000037957425,0.00048618717,0.0004144324,0.007755589,0.00026290352,0.0007992034,0.09935532,0.00027830098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000535948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040702085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21585003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066009734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041011936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133948460","doi":"10.5860/crl.75.5.664","title":"Exploring the Veterinary Literature: A Bibliometric Methodology for Identifying Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Publications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publication; Accreditation; Veterinary medicine; Bibliometrics; Work (physics); Scopus; Institution; Library science; MEDLINE; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9170081740482853,"score_gpt":0.6480557156310761,"score_spread":0.26895245841720916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133948460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8303041,0.022876278,0.06501492,0.05516383,0.002227151,0.003891841,0.00078902947,0.00018917008,0.019543692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666497,0.0014081133,0.02386839,0.00015274697,0.0004025413,0.0012429853,0.000022688253,0.00003826681,0.0062145577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866926,0.0046335966,0.0007975126,0.0011520222,0.0055769635,0.0011472803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81915855,0.16638684,0.00030808113,0.001998062,0.01131292,0.00083555357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07957655,0.00022233716,0.00046869778,0.34431803,0.0029006137,0.014836229,0.0036965357,0.00013292761,0.000094908355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19961172,0.0001345169,0.0001485618,0.74725837,0.0015108634,0.0061461036,0.0052559846,0.0007836302,0.000059670343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046295562,0.00018078314,0.002973816,0.000100013014,0.00008846841,0.000017706532,0.0058502546,0.0000055313035,0.0028525987,0.41572785,0.2293239,0.34241614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008860344,0.0016480536,0.11274911,0.00005623795,0.000009777636,0.00004098372,0.015815046,0.0035174529,0.0023922762,0.41470206,0.44784254,0.0003404346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008149759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008479704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40294033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079723104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839747},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2134053123","doi":"10.5860/crl-203","title":"Open Access Publishing: What Authors Want","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Electronic publishing; Library science; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Access to information; Information access; Computer science; Political science; Public relations; The Internet; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.9264619247716932,"score_gpt":0.7023231709270353,"score_spread":0.22413875384465787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134053123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3288011,0.03306763,0.0012932483,0.15483688,0.008986031,0.0045392723,0.0004940341,0.0002628857,0.46771896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92702496,0.0012634669,0.0016135636,0.0006618715,0.00071076286,0.00019573745,0.000022538688,0.000047016158,0.06846008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671858,0.0027341575,0.0010816681,0.0013236392,0.024535464,0.003139299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95286125,0.03027673,0.00035954564,0.0033787251,0.009152212,0.003971535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12785108,0.00027955207,0.0006067311,0.07403236,0.0021984782,0.379762,0.03921367,0.00034217775,0.0078383945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2129793,0.00018876276,0.00018618138,0.33410674,0.0013457631,0.21157826,0.050356172,0.0016423526,0.0018172029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000914495,0.00026069127,0.0508212,0.000007780681,0.000018554476,0.000026778114,0.0005714615,0.0000013143308,0.000058392066,0.13859507,0.73991615,0.06963118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000480604,0.00013161708,0.06618313,0.00002531365,0.0000022180886,0.000009281941,0.00942742,0.00039625485,0.0021894265,0.12925184,0.7916353,0.00026761836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033980724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033827513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59822387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002574562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027205308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134386090","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.001","title":"The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Impact factor; Citation; Preference; Computer science; Index (typography); Information retrieval; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Library science; Data science; Operations research; Statistics; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.578649466269294,"score_gpt":0.5307756849711357,"score_spread":0.047873781298158335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134386090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9258365,0.0001783194,0.05949329,0.0012445912,0.0016322633,0.00025201324,0.0000045456936,0.000004447551,0.011354001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684832,0.00007673225,0.030764908,0.00027567046,0.00017870929,0.0000019728832,3.8600305e-7,0.000008352406,0.00021008316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98194844,0.00029310005,0.002368455,0.00018161055,0.014692408,0.00051597465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97017926,0.014804917,0.0027784656,0.0008279893,0.010904237,0.00050510635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10649229,0.00016240048,0.00036751365,0.04023067,0.0010362114,0.003272895,0.005699869,0.00013954286,0.00012183549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13048086,0.0000635925,0.0002634895,0.112865664,0.00022542883,0.0010144822,0.000268404,0.00200126,0.000016381568],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024905172,0.0003844371,0.024839312,0.000008932821,0.000048664937,0.00001010842,0.00070714985,0.0008745607,0.00063838705,0.001544114,0.007483589,0.9632117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00437344,0.0028759788,0.57301503,0.00011713478,0.00004966682,0.0005630559,0.005224383,0.13341539,0.010527979,0.013850848,0.25525907,0.0007280212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017913493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060879393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96248364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115140734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020007158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967974},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2134548949","doi":"10.1002/asi.23005","title":"Are elite journals declining?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Publishing; Prestige; Publication; Excellence; Citation; Impact factor; Diversification (marketing strategy); Political science; Hierarchy; Library science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.3054164613764956,"score_gpt":0.5279448656534843,"score_spread":0.22252840427698872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134548949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413248,0.00025812746,0.0018635124,0.051760893,0.0013581445,0.00035768503,0.000013281318,0.000012767741,0.003050796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977771,0.00012937137,0.00075596495,0.00079265086,0.000045033143,0.0000054887714,6.7428054e-8,0.0000015862142,0.00049271435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991788,0.0000449708,0.0010696069,0.000102223334,0.0066764387,0.0003187474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95804113,0.0016586073,0.0048491987,0.00027977125,0.03501958,0.00015173451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042850185,0.00006105727,0.00020490157,0.031431206,0.00061317213,0.0030722995,0.0022235538,0.0001302156,0.000031718046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26336104,0.00003200192,0.00009222995,0.08477138,0.0002456384,0.0065517607,0.00036711586,0.0002802216,0.00006768309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053467384,0.000022106398,0.6701295,0.0000024900883,0.000015372747,1.3744707e-7,0.00018401576,0.000021406593,0.0009936311,0.0047290595,0.05486328,0.26903364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059902103,0.00009515886,0.6807141,0.00001974278,0.000007842706,0.00003567897,0.0022985488,0.001998134,0.0017375929,0.083998345,0.22841044,0.0000854548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003054011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012996412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2689482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029307345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034739656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135154713","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12026","title":"The Relevance of the “h‐” and “g‐” Index to Economics in the Context of A Nation‐Wide Research Evaluation Scheme: The New Zealand Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Relevance (law); Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Journal ranking; Scheme (mathematics); Citation; Frame (networking); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Operations research; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.26799216679491544,"score_gpt":0.48934658099934286,"score_spread":0.22135441420442742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135154713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964383,0.0004581651,0.0000022680206,0.03050309,0.00013597567,0.0006339973,0.000014585185,4.6244787e-7,0.0038684257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950496,0.003885807,0.000062664825,0.0005947221,0.00016096198,0.00001870979,1.9046581e-7,0.000007821292,0.00021955562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997371,0.00025585256,0.0012019662,0.00026579245,0.0005616067,0.00034377602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883371,0.009456062,0.00090076466,0.0005900746,0.000521923,0.0001940823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029080749,0.000119017976,0.00032366588,0.0039989995,0.00038123975,0.00095461105,0.0016091687,0.0000757855,0.000040982803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049825395,0.0000553771,0.00009822225,0.0041602147,0.00047844008,0.00026946823,0.00039903776,0.00038177395,0.00001187501],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038677547,0.000078742574,0.034939807,0.000009045284,0.00015628566,0.0000015879864,0.012665834,0.010504977,0.00035839443,0.11569504,0.02984394,0.79535955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005581677,0.0004954978,0.32613912,0.000036333982,0.000031591037,0.00042439252,0.037150864,0.051766764,0.0008929486,0.3142984,0.2627738,0.00040860556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019514567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023611863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79495096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026366214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009909138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135196769","doi":"10.1177/0883073808315170","title":"Worshiping False Idols: The Impact Factor Dilemma","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Child Neurology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamite; Citation; Dilemma; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation index; Economic shortage; Science Citation Index; Alchemy; Explosive material; History; Law; Art history; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.44131852269467553,"score_gpt":0.5594017655138307,"score_spread":0.11808324281915517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135196769","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05571276,0.0038692106,0.00015664111,0.026988324,0.9115929,0.00026593704,0.00019570667,0.000012847007,0.0012056816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15383686,0.005904269,0.000012432106,0.0018395726,0.8378528,0.0000026898813,0.0000052474184,0.000058620302,0.00048752764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97683066,0.0018513002,0.0022532637,0.0007219367,0.017326634,0.0010161909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425081,0.045696016,0.003218745,0.0011271145,0.006791733,0.0006582606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019771082,0.00043927523,0.001341976,0.051746104,0.00052017096,0.002008993,0.008247738,0.0011039783,0.0007350341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19101125,0.0002047245,0.0013000689,0.059828516,0.00045503446,0.00061142794,0.0009696412,0.006375589,0.00018874345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002744078,0.00009499215,0.0027629533,0.0000023443472,0.00007392417,0.00038124833,0.000054384916,0.00011505803,0.0000062517124,0.0000059895688,0.97800744,0.018220985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060694065,0.0014294392,0.021522706,0.00001522547,0.00001519095,0.0006517908,0.0000045535016,0.00007018585,0.000012955138,0.0009626417,0.974524,0.00018436776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003603529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009288412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17124017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117393545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012906994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137829353","doi":"10.1002/2327-6924.12163","title":"Author and journal responsibilities postpublication: The relationship continues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nurse practitioners; Medicine; Family medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.2735482378427201,"score_gpt":0.5313622366473569,"score_spread":0.25781399880463685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137829353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79123205,0.00014347292,0.0011813461,0.20448932,0.0007399239,0.00009163958,0.000008867751,0.0000034862876,0.0021099143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913583,0.00006136427,0.0009765737,0.00049653783,0.0002156719,0.0000011683029,3.0669653e-7,0.0000055931223,0.0068845046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990746,0.0025745158,0.0010476987,0.0001360629,0.005299114,0.00019656758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92721224,0.04782988,0.012631525,0.0006391437,0.011417805,0.00026939102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05403686,0.000080090416,0.00029321623,0.0057805544,0.00052140345,0.0011870802,0.0011179604,0.000046747256,0.0000543346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3334698,0.00004008141,0.00022042963,0.021708747,0.00041261254,0.0010697396,0.00008976707,0.0006039565,0.000010238169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014824803,0.00009136266,0.77622944,0.0000016215836,0.000075602264,5.279487e-7,0.00100793,0.000073197916,0.00040702548,0.0064751883,0.19038275,0.025107106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028263763,0.00021102818,0.88747805,0.000013286155,0.000029887393,0.000074571966,0.0051100673,0.00019585337,0.00008737203,0.021333417,0.085131824,0.000052003845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017085422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057237366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27943295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002846035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034367925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139696124","doi":"10.1177/014107680710000313","title":"Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors’ views","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Medical Association; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Citation; Publishing; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3038861671097597,"score_gpt":0.5442329820298968,"score_spread":0.2403468149201371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139696124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965149,0.010163686,0.004637755,0.018211396,0.0011334174,0.00017688469,0.00014774167,0.0000016931845,0.0003784321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973591,0.00085323787,0.0002125959,0.00016639606,0.0010311811,2.6819683e-7,3.893662e-7,0.0000061404335,0.00037069968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902414,0.00024492366,0.0016767011,0.00019837872,0.007306249,0.00033233856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887209,0.0055318354,0.0026251846,0.00036809652,0.0021132356,0.000640755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04664489,0.0001550929,0.0012023603,0.00613939,0.00016254497,0.000059650414,0.001546742,0.0001816699,0.0008381142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02593424,0.000054058677,0.0012632022,0.03243958,0.0010512139,0.00012879593,0.00034871514,0.00050884834,7.513653e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015191826,0.0001878379,0.4955806,0.000020934385,0.0022002878,6.942977e-7,0.0037956256,0.0001668368,0.0012190818,0.00001515587,0.44395003,0.052710976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015090763,0.0007163929,0.9751156,0.00010997262,0.00027841143,0.000011870974,0.0027688534,0.011783081,0.0009336266,0.001204282,0.005495442,0.00007341433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095992684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018503497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47953495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104273255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003499597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139770987","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0127-8","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Natural science; The arts; Citation index; Index (typography); Sociology; Social science; Citation; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.43608455016924813,"score_gpt":0.5388048553623775,"score_spread":0.10272030519312941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139770987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516325,0.0055379667,0.00064213277,0.004157518,0.0013402897,0.0006155912,0.00012917444,0.000015599904,0.035929225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766755,0.00003482786,0.00020691761,0.00036625692,0.000082766346,0.000008522271,0.0000037511709,0.000002866187,0.0016265344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856075,0.00071395846,0.0007841504,0.00073701766,0.0113566555,0.00080070825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98838294,0.006461841,0.0006148186,0.00044104853,0.003980749,0.000118588294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045255516,0.00017393919,0.0005177922,0.12537162,0.00542787,0.008359406,0.0038698844,0.00008531764,0.000072147865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012719167,0.0000822153,0.00025502633,0.75563353,0.009273396,0.000741326,0.00067605835,0.00026276932,0.0000070178535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030437637,0.000103575105,0.5593642,0.0000042972524,0.00016232397,0.0000016001686,0.002907607,0.02553765,0.000054577366,0.3731199,0.033742134,0.0049716895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005735985,0.000063907515,0.6948568,0.0000036809804,0.00012390276,0.0000017886155,0.0037867024,0.28230578,0.00007599826,0.0045476207,0.013459983,0.00020023761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04476495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13636485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63026196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003015797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014160976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99586695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140303754","doi":"10.1017/s000708740999032x","title":"William H. Brock, William Crookes (1832–1919) and the Commercialization of Science. Alderhot: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. xxi+556. ISBN 978-0-7546-6322-5. £65.00 (hardback).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2029347153252693,"score_gpt":0.4338361723541546,"score_spread":0.23090145702888532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140303754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740488,0.33878264,0.019502968,0.01661238,0.022142082,0.004135701,0.00022869968,0.0000861722,0.024460517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97008795,0.01502688,0.00083948154,0.0010784323,0.00027038637,0.000011518694,8.995761e-7,0.000019039711,0.012665411],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98548263,0.00039797678,0.0014101512,0.00075780327,0.010918084,0.0010333721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675334,0.004101883,0.0013463846,0.0010509016,0.006264723,0.0004827858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06027495,0.00024651963,0.0005971484,0.0067136623,0.0080098305,0.0036593652,0.009796625,0.00009136972,0.00012501328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024749598,0.00013440425,0.0003317181,0.04977921,0.030793138,0.0023059521,0.0006822868,0.0006322949,0.000014163463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035033902,0.00034121383,0.0019333793,0.000021277274,0.00003553991,0.000012692534,0.003536176,0.000741351,0.018248904,0.0034964855,0.49235058,0.47893205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045515723,0.0012488475,0.13660264,0.0003854326,0.00012528215,0.0019920825,0.0056466865,0.015259669,0.0044265697,0.08671643,0.74221796,0.0008268587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037617233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008162105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4781052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019153919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140526998","doi":"10.1177/0011392113512839","title":"Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Latin Americans; Competition (biology); Publishing; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Underpinning; Economics; Regional science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7347256811544957,"score_gpt":0.6247458854410771,"score_spread":0.10997979571341854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140526998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935819,0.0015742076,0.0006310334,0.002841634,0.0005620308,0.0006829653,0.000042511365,0.0000059396707,0.000077769175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.00018729806,0.00020807209,0.000022118902,0.000020460417,0.00009311944,0.0000051342217,0.0000033176063,0.00006513784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623793,0.0002603002,0.0006092791,0.000703602,0.0017198535,0.00046905476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907234,0.0048858523,0.0004324135,0.0004484569,0.0032892355,0.00022067822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011552645,0.00010969348,0.00024583272,0.008837704,0.0006738908,0.0013392606,0.0013671562,0.000050448023,0.000046813337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044226274,0.000058817863,0.000055055483,0.031447727,0.0018162285,0.0008349452,0.0007136203,0.00027471225,0.000015405041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015927895,0.00023285192,0.16973656,0.000031536067,0.000004349382,3.264952e-8,0.0021945946,0.000017179573,0.0041522556,0.017816098,0.004568069,0.80123055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002656201,0.000085802916,0.97871035,0.000029496274,0.0000011732892,5.612308e-7,0.0002141904,0.0018003951,0.00011781224,0.013376338,0.0053079408,0.00009030139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030429288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009578856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8089738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002381894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010864902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140842165","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007098","title":"Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Field (mathematics); Baseline (sea); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Regional science; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Statistics; Geography; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Data mining; Library science; Political science; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7583291958422465,"score_gpt":0.6992803763177389,"score_spread":0.05904881952450758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140842165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779146,0.00011145362,0.0011112619,0.003420162,0.00030457455,0.00012234975,0.0000018871406,0.0000023075102,0.017011419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997849,0.00008754471,0.0009836679,0.00003440173,0.00037217073,0.0000031925777,4.7580406e-7,0.0000032512821,0.00066631805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739368,0.0002874021,0.00089704065,0.00025142485,0.024227174,0.00040016897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827369,0.0017113057,0.0004232573,0.000099278404,0.014881883,0.00014737977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095453754,0.000059072598,0.00015858686,0.086923465,0.0005117872,0.0024566925,0.001443035,0.00004004246,0.00030179988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0341233,0.00004061968,0.000068209876,0.1821378,0.0003445516,0.003148187,0.0002866577,0.00033855796,0.000065563894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015074568,0.00044671234,0.6891846,0.000007636105,0.00001197335,0.0000708915,0.004195155,0.00026368635,0.04312862,0.0123565355,0.027862301,0.22232112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863914,0.00014331144,0.8687799,0.00002007455,7.79527e-7,0.00004578278,0.007280326,0.0015907903,0.0015904254,0.11166864,0.008007415,0.000086168795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014941192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061255205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22223495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007444668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009273901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141246632","doi":"10.1023/a:1016007205344","title":"Contribution of Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine to the world's biomedical literature (1988-1997)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turkish; Science Citation Index; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.38260139108866204,"score_gpt":0.5123331948262367,"score_spread":0.1297318037375747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141246632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8270816,0.008086269,0.043394364,0.089746326,0.005856201,0.0020423552,0.0032019054,0.000105607774,0.020485317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876325,0.0001803516,0.00077860587,0.00026475437,0.000120343364,0.0000012675667,0.0000353337,0.000006896274,0.01097996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97939265,0.00038544412,0.000959283,0.0007836906,0.017739499,0.00073942926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98215014,0.004967541,0.0005808116,0.001168145,0.010304725,0.00082862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029692553,0.0001902538,0.0005595677,0.1754737,0.00032167442,0.00039661044,0.0043919366,0.00015536784,0.0012024626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119134694,0.00010633474,0.00021125418,0.7391614,0.0011882654,0.00044604414,0.0010381409,0.0003952731,0.00021741471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057451467,0.0005029702,0.037470795,0.000017050079,0.000038524817,0.000026996411,0.0013428053,0.00006844608,0.0019403773,0.007372724,0.7886925,0.16246936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012674049,0.0004744406,0.118648805,0.00005394365,0.000019253566,0.0000067676674,0.0004687295,0.0048400178,0.0014398205,0.0006224755,0.8719763,0.00018201883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055290613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027522818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5636877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021560832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009047071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141275412","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.343","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Public relations; Open data; Scholarly communication; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141275412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031478,0.0008432237,0.011257841,0.05635061,0.0027467313,0.0012268085,0.00021950314,0.00006039547,0.024147091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410326,0.00004407036,0.053104833,0.0033855084,0.00066492177,0.00001397742,0.000028940018,0.000035115085,0.0016900473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697313,0.0014735789,0.0034139366,0.0016570351,0.022308877,0.0014153286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8700938,0.011779959,0.004140586,0.0026766113,0.107819885,0.0034891136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24006544,0.00038823235,0.00092715997,0.06397784,0.0018143994,0.7975296,0.022871837,0.00061908783,0.0008636441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.731846,0.0002925379,0.0005819236,0.13397464,0.00022777758,0.6333806,0.0014946999,0.0042716553,0.00007658113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507036,0.0017334599,0.33707026,0.0000143736,0.00005683543,0.000054849035,0.00036570887,0.0000817928,0.008262666,0.0077905273,0.20937258,0.4346899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066955914,0.0022925637,0.51166034,0.00014893725,0.00004520527,0.00013505995,0.002146121,0.0022565026,0.0010627592,0.17529158,0.29759875,0.00066659687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104976316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030312673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49178052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047434024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141810726","doi":"10.1002/meet.2011.14504801190","title":"Bibliometrics and LIS education: How do they fit together?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Higher education; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2697617665253107,"score_gpt":0.463028559855294,"score_spread":0.1932667933299833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141810726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874383,0.000209506,0.00018676656,0.00584687,0.0001344332,0.00039126546,0.000017044398,0.000034172044,0.005741611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881042,0.0006616293,0.010580109,0.0004757465,0.00001393368,0.00003880734,1.7366087e-7,0.0000036012202,0.000121745616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581796,0.0000036617366,0.00039271006,0.00032616596,0.0030436974,0.00041580296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876324,0.000360608,0.000898565,0.00027914566,0.010666269,0.00016301719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011138528,0.000111422836,0.00023809492,0.045926034,0.00058395136,0.0014277932,0.0024308753,0.00008048008,0.000004751947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022307398,0.00006678522,0.00010704508,0.33512738,0.0035586867,0.0036993495,0.0010917617,0.00016421868,0.000003250743],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011005835,0.000047305748,0.12496274,0.000023379127,0.000012759051,6.8980874e-9,0.0024259754,7.212336e-8,0.0022339395,0.047654994,0.013170446,0.80945736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010166973,0.0015759773,0.2534449,0.000049334187,0.000051727315,0.00007881711,0.19886391,0.002703409,0.043321658,0.21892406,0.27921137,0.0007581105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037636557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.2283445e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80869925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006386587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038619083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141830052","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00674.x","title":"Measuring Canadian Business School Research Output and Impact","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Per capita; Political science; Citation; Production (economics); Knowledge production; Citation impact; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Microeconomics; Demography; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.7774522412148315,"score_gpt":0.5354232998974645,"score_spread":0.24202894131736696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141830052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91288966,0.024593852,0.00036060152,0.019916885,0.0026671218,0.0005382136,0.00040211837,0.000007598544,0.038623974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864736,0.0013061555,0.004102138,0.00021646584,0.0007279001,0.0000090059275,0.0000029111789,0.000026892889,0.007134901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854757,0.0019349435,0.001986794,0.0015614616,0.0041188477,0.0049222307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651641,0.0035059582,0.0010372689,0.00063863886,0.0122497585,0.017404249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06478695,0.0006055698,0.00089029764,0.05145286,0.008421387,0.014281599,0.005244997,0.00052774535,0.003576922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07550182,0.00052900513,0.00032037176,0.11913749,0.02489092,0.005246409,0.00015115502,0.0016686993,0.00017433513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010403489,0.00042419348,0.5773002,0.0003788104,0.00024870463,0.010671452,0.03633981,0.003460444,0.00067903864,0.044803478,0.04473772,0.28085214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018019103,0.027419124,0.58899325,0.0026362578,0.00017634752,0.027118787,0.06945125,0.05272221,0.0007436905,0.09955664,0.1264226,0.0029579466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5881704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38089228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007889517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080259144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142066148","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1676-5","title":"Benchmarking bibliometrics in biomedical research: research performance of the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine, 2008–2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Benchmarking; Citation; Citation analysis; Web of science; Library science; Impact factor; Medical education; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.8554237139510291,"score_gpt":0.6280879688612137,"score_spread":0.22733574508981547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142066148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97074926,0.005911822,0.00039847963,0.00083512056,0.0013091587,0.0005700495,0.000113564405,0.000008939991,0.02010359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511844,0.0018351391,0.0012762776,0.000008806418,0.00008168112,0.0000015438246,0.0000059540794,0.000012153271,0.0016600172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93211627,0.0022440546,0.0017912084,0.0010779446,0.06114908,0.0016214364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9467135,0.015157316,0.00090553216,0.0021757702,0.033871733,0.0011761212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25774965,0.00020151296,0.0008022854,0.3996344,0.00040005674,0.0001999276,0.009313801,0.00033268382,0.00080709043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2301776,0.00012935871,0.00019471558,0.8761707,0.0067171846,0.0013183093,0.004277602,0.0010736196,0.0000434158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014440298,0.0008517007,0.69681776,0.00009461898,0.000019148043,0.000009516255,0.0029290183,0.0001483899,0.0016378337,0.0011921974,0.15040843,0.14574696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021434515,0.0017956053,0.88497525,0.00016894873,0.000008075362,0.0000058654005,0.008069461,0.011161698,0.0016871506,0.0013820861,0.08838829,0.00021411874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085304035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006619983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4765363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001025088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020934455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142992057","doi":"","title":"Bootstrapping to evaluate accuracy of citation-based journal indicators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Impact factor; Interpretation (philosophy); Statistics; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5200063442583572,"score_gpt":0.5320609243583265,"score_spread":0.012054580099969292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142992057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97614247,0.00017096552,0.010172287,0.00068768987,0.0005006119,0.00024677478,0.0000273272,0.000027720343,0.012024149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962248,0.000009648198,0.0018484243,0.00018547827,0.000066916306,0.000001114297,0.00000937483,0.000015068458,0.0016391629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890653,0.00016708235,0.00084361056,0.0005361542,0.008784943,0.00060289854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022216,0.002058507,0.0008979451,0.000552111,0.0048533743,0.0014159295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014079462,0.00019491518,0.00039176588,0.06740188,0.00028415277,0.000736631,0.0022695488,0.00012485414,0.0008059592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03291801,0.00015882704,0.00024174673,0.12401978,0.00017550081,0.0010613009,0.0003311648,0.00034140184,0.00030136513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048215705,0.00041835487,0.773507,0.000019482355,0.00018972975,0.00037435288,0.00451987,0.016246455,0.0021441956,0.0032333566,0.12066166,0.07820341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009712851,0.0033407481,0.43908334,0.00022773801,0.00025975247,0.00009170072,0.04140321,0.030628068,0.0145738935,0.012986893,0.44579503,0.0018967502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001149847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011395017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33442363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021411812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014922075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97522813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143612877","doi":"10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x","title":"Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Citation impact; Sample (material); Citation analysis; Web of science; Information retrieval; Scholarly communication; Impact factor; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Publishing","score_opus":0.9469149544521874,"score_gpt":0.6472795575330219,"score_spread":0.2996353969191655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143612877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8102085,0.0018029857,0.13279562,0.00034027637,0.002484117,0.0015697593,0.0005850005,0.00018067272,0.050033085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96615493,0.00008863856,0.03145721,0.00016474507,0.00009907644,0.00002988908,0.00001709604,0.00002809965,0.0019602978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.968701,0.00027037435,0.0012499349,0.0015562727,0.026639005,0.001583426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707146,0.003109583,0.0006914015,0.001836327,0.02224485,0.0014031943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09005316,0.0003228453,0.00050356897,0.18648191,0.00068039267,0.0069597946,0.005891509,0.00019925224,0.00094686856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23355797,0.00022214335,0.0004149593,0.492865,0.00024840876,0.0030273125,0.0011143233,0.0004992308,0.0004698049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012026401,0.0011978964,0.23904707,0.000028177426,0.000095182506,0.00001899053,0.00066901074,0.00006849066,0.0037167408,0.004157508,0.024212776,0.7266679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209964,0.0016555167,0.8873448,0.000036939426,0.000048129867,0.000013965155,0.0015528861,0.010463558,0.005317414,0.024259526,0.066176124,0.0010315485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024279398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029896744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72563636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000882061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058745296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143750031","doi":"10.1111/radm.12100","title":"Scientists' commitment to underperforming research projects: linking past success and the social environment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"R and D Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Business; Investment (military); Escalation of commitment; Social network (sociolinguistics); Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.5463097067868062,"score_gpt":0.5646876813673392,"score_spread":0.01837797458053292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143750031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271577,0.0009327284,0.044753853,0.032860193,0.0006352068,0.0034700455,0.000009452854,0.00004030585,0.09014054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955086,0.00039420524,0.0009484347,0.0003927064,0.00012812564,0.00008999181,0.0000011524423,0.000007249204,0.0025295478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916511,0.0004990469,0.00036620293,0.0007140195,0.0061498783,0.0006197325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972632,0.0016894373,0.00007159063,0.000475237,0.00026323245,0.00023732446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04856187,0.00011877078,0.00021037445,0.011605541,0.0018885888,0.0035589656,0.0011407939,0.000041321073,0.00005234061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092671503,0.00006707211,0.000046554393,0.022777231,0.00072302046,0.0002056137,0.0032961275,0.00020170197,0.000108141045],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008205045,0.000120610064,0.024019407,0.000054471922,0.000036663034,0.000007425993,0.0022905816,0.000037783513,0.000025396304,0.16948663,0.012739084,0.7910999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031749876,0.00034198482,0.23554626,0.000048476264,0.000024533338,0.0000054460065,0.007839815,0.014014488,0.00009170861,0.040768117,0.6977806,0.0003635634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070957176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016425656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7907363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010578637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001401792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145535121","doi":"10.5539/ass.v9n5p18","title":"A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1875,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Prestige; Rank (graph theory); Database; Computer science; Bibliographic database; Publishing; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.41470723689172,"score_gpt":0.5854768175044064,"score_spread":0.17076958061268638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145535121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764812,0.00082422345,0.00073444785,0.0025648212,0.00057711324,0.00071442814,0.00018164043,0.000038624385,0.11788355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751705,0.000058349102,0.0014469608,0.0000906065,0.0001469843,0.000015770825,0.000001599615,0.0000053299937,0.00071734603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844107,0.00017613315,0.00073767186,0.0010495686,0.012677974,0.0009479755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179024,0.0014682936,0.0003838777,0.00052087754,0.00515299,0.0006837382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02948301,0.00015600586,0.0003996025,0.03782594,0.002806367,0.0041731275,0.003968174,0.000085844586,0.00016596809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03728437,0.00011484774,0.000059383718,0.42613232,0.009427341,0.0036943369,0.0015763704,0.0005195288,0.00007580451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007774246,0.00009297922,0.29443556,0.000011018462,0.000005993784,0.0000028903694,0.0025458797,5.8202573e-7,0.060842205,0.013467652,0.03727934,0.5913081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005195673,0.0001499041,0.9588838,0.00004840584,0.0000083407795,0.000010652564,0.005214492,0.0015667554,0.008433482,0.013981478,0.01086018,0.00032294076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024854692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017285089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6644482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000277053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002514927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145694442","doi":"10.1007/s11192-010-0278-5","title":"Is the academic Ivory Tower becoming a managed structure? A nested analysis of the variance in activities of researchers from natural sciences and engineering in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ivory tower; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Variance (accounting); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Adaptation (eye); Institutional theory; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Law; Business","score_opus":0.3143140146529494,"score_gpt":0.4913641469124948,"score_spread":0.1770501322595454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145694442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973474,0.00092942605,0.00003841584,0.00071460236,0.0005701259,0.00021846182,0.00008268875,0.0000025126592,0.0000963677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993473,0.00006970411,0.00037627618,0.0000824009,0.000012414965,0.0000034594664,6.6656884e-7,0.0000046730192,0.000103047336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98824805,0.0002584451,0.00076713687,0.0006657005,0.009414913,0.00064577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841796,0.013815248,0.00039454838,0.0007736201,0.0006656064,0.0001713842],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023630831,0.0001443833,0.00043674925,0.09748745,0.00019347749,0.0005183533,0.004082181,0.000107056345,0.00010928355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057198226,0.00007916786,0.000106695035,0.5808077,0.00076256087,0.00054791494,0.0011815027,0.0012145229,2.509117e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008496918,0.000013997169,0.98062366,0.0000049806195,0.000030397034,0.0000019323397,0.0009995882,0.0015256724,0.008892696,0.00016821174,0.000109735796,0.0076206485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021641837,0.0000110938045,0.8948194,0.000012089274,0.000014020122,5.562162e-7,0.0015195423,0.10055468,0.0022078957,0.00045284504,0.0001051838,0.00008627036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35006437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56524616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48332027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027265825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012316637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146704605","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060687","title":"Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Proxy (statistics); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Test (biology); Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10349770925510939,"score_gpt":0.46514020023728275,"score_spread":0.3616424909821734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146704605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96520406,0.00037648124,0.0026769866,0.020678934,0.0008391053,0.00012226423,0.00048107543,0.000004713967,0.009616377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986152,0.000058452002,0.0001128187,0.0001362556,0.00024595,0.0000012143352,0.0000061011237,0.0000032908647,0.00082068983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98367196,0.0003626463,0.0012552561,0.00018973749,0.014018088,0.0005023149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841692,0.0029782827,0.0007301038,0.0002370418,0.010446451,0.0014389481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05177853,0.00007109038,0.00031227007,0.012249358,0.00022594797,0.00033707797,0.0011758731,0.0003411896,0.0026496185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18569341,0.00004636823,0.00021796125,0.04400643,0.00013562961,0.0003142893,0.000065914,0.0006304611,0.000046465753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004417255,0.000082996296,0.79653883,0.000003140865,0.000014837643,0.000023240073,0.000041421583,0.00002992478,0.000069917965,0.0065706884,0.17830253,0.018318051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005294903,0.00006886615,0.8413581,0.000019820554,0.0000063032694,0.00002483536,0.00018126324,0.0007855064,0.00023079212,0.04836468,0.1083539,0.00007640491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004390167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010661085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13391489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007117523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003404079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146918704","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011","title":"Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; University of Auckland","keywords":"Causal inference; Coding (social sciences); Longitudinal study; Longitudinal data; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Medicine; Econometrics; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.7862779829075962,"score_gpt":0.7031571443127773,"score_spread":0.08312083859481889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146918704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97924984,0.00029267286,0.0000349394,0.013537649,0.00006502938,0.001311289,0.0000355659,0.000012626308,0.00546038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807648,0.00028891306,0.000184821,0.000012353078,0.0002277506,0.0000047041667,0.0000033191554,0.00001012233,0.018503208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454972,0.008164673,0.000955415,0.0017193161,0.0409476,0.0027157925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95687574,0.017611917,0.00015441768,0.0017765886,0.021130221,0.0024511102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1844882,0.00016585602,0.0004970072,0.24216838,0.0011096859,0.0025881792,0.0036942936,0.00024903848,0.00015074894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12709504,0.00013424725,0.000059496262,0.5092384,0.0020722114,0.0009045127,0.0025584958,0.0020824957,0.00016818827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011574801,0.005328098,0.4738782,0.000026710066,0.000030411578,0.00067785766,0.013154518,0.000018370016,0.0020644462,0.020001171,0.27221662,0.2114461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028653683,0.0047742,0.88778496,0.00004687319,0.0000015313855,0.000011095576,0.014680718,0.00090681104,0.00013274324,0.02636861,0.06226656,0.00016053507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033150382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053169094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41390675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001143691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077477936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844724},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2147137475","doi":"10.5210/fm.v12i10.1959","title":"From production to publishing at CJC online: Experiences, insights, and considerations for adoption","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Monday","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Audience measurement; Electronic publishing; Production (economics); Focus (optics); Public relations; Business; Political science; The Internet; Advertising; World Wide Web; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.4981744242324274,"score_gpt":0.5093103750540346,"score_spread":0.011135950821607232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147137475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796213,0.0005232349,0.009742731,0.008032355,0.0013169755,0.0004444683,0.00007998136,0.000031023897,0.00020790925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797393,0.000045390643,0.017912338,0.00028069163,0.00048809152,0.000047191952,0.000034875928,0.0000084992635,0.0014436014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541205,0.000048831484,0.0005306954,0.0007914663,0.0028345515,0.0003823797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200714,0.004805405,0.00015404972,0.00063327345,0.0019704243,0.00042971998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006409343,0.00011347888,0.00018641177,0.014681625,0.0007703295,0.0036683546,0.0006307825,0.00011489597,0.0003156914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09886733,0.00008415507,0.000053353666,0.03346939,0.00009797756,0.0017002139,0.0005486562,0.00013147017,0.000053297063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013704399,0.00030484635,0.031430017,0.0000094515535,0.000021607493,0.00001300521,0.1184881,0.00021725844,0.00609932,0.00058247446,0.73470134,0.10799556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004055271,0.00015367717,0.115429826,0.000013854998,0.0000051441916,0.0000075876696,0.008195904,0.0019137175,0.007021792,0.009497277,0.8571202,0.00023545201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021107592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004310735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12241893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015169165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007369249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99736595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147194198","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101311","title":"Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Multivariate analysis; Library science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7377882140349933,"score_gpt":0.6333431856879266,"score_spread":0.1044450283470667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147194198","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27278885,0.0031732232,0.001955932,0.7197912,0.0012862013,0.00010862072,0.000007401808,0.000004318872,0.00088426674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624143,0.0130228745,0.0013045464,0.02154074,0.00069588056,0.0000028527306,6.378152e-7,0.000013295635,0.0010048506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9490835,0.0019113902,0.0019970743,0.00043304628,0.045849096,0.00072586205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92920065,0.054273672,0.0017100468,0.00078768167,0.008801628,0.0052263252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1806186,0.0002020005,0.0007715202,0.032122344,0.00023421348,0.003735425,0.0036683546,0.0016680643,0.006315853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33243597,0.00010361549,0.00023097175,0.04687287,0.0011352092,0.0012903338,0.00089937483,0.00877544,0.00008953437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004312114,0.00040550446,0.050642833,0.00004863663,0.000041204898,0.0006343616,0.0046028965,7.558178e-7,0.00014275785,0.0006146338,0.7643243,0.17849901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028952537,0.0009898576,0.08051968,0.0010228488,0.00002291348,0.0009331369,0.013104122,0.005541556,0.00017064005,0.26550457,0.62882006,0.00047539163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003046656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002219176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011443685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020377445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147607381","doi":"10.1177/1098214007309280","title":"The Evaluation of Large Research Initiatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Program evaluation; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Political science; Management science; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.8816684527440397,"score_gpt":0.727468180018336,"score_spread":0.1542002727257037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147607381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891057,0.0018344495,0.0014390178,0.001238122,0.00030901583,0.00028124353,0.000004714444,0.0000014889597,0.005786228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986893,0.0007605782,0.000323713,0.000024756588,0.00012224352,0.000008076996,8.201211e-7,0.000005414658,0.00006509508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93062854,0.009501756,0.0015933621,0.0002975611,0.05746344,0.0005153461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140736,0.014790451,0.0016002763,0.00050079974,0.06885068,0.00018422763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36563444,0.000073522344,0.00027716334,0.020573715,0.00061591074,0.00027043626,0.0012337404,0.00003090312,0.0003782494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22491363,0.000040009807,0.00015105197,0.09118454,0.0009350633,0.0007370567,0.00017447442,0.00037241325,0.00004785818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012983666,0.00022031344,0.05034644,8.969214e-7,0.000052820465,0.0000036381098,0.002031767,0.00086236105,0.00090451457,0.0008260244,0.008424918,0.93619645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013213335,0.001622692,0.8919392,0.000016467882,0.00003838969,0.00005981162,0.010143766,0.065817125,0.0014151023,0.023506483,0.004031598,0.00008802626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025234429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011306279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93610847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027434313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022186744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150354467","doi":"10.6000/1929-7092.2015.04.11","title":"Bibliometric Rankings of Journals Based on the Thomson Reuters Citations Database","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reviews on Global Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Database; Web of science; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7579617406582054,"score_gpt":0.587304561522659,"score_spread":0.17065717913554646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150354467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8594081,0.05416258,0.023516273,0.03249533,0.004650164,0.0012890182,0.0005821538,0.000011286117,0.023885136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91414994,0.060123675,0.017848888,0.0071147406,0.0005164305,0.000008936981,0.000004773501,0.000026386735,0.0002062124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169403,0.00083003624,0.002581735,0.00033167572,0.004181929,0.00038059757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834929,0.006601452,0.003856671,0.0010485341,0.0042887283,0.000711719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08233699,0.00019770644,0.0008721403,0.18749063,0.00013228925,0.0013750921,0.003328664,0.000086290296,0.00024836953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10689491,0.000103220955,0.0006146646,0.41280785,0.00014573192,0.0008320256,0.00020081257,0.00044408874,0.00022576828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032667932,0.000512943,0.036628902,0.0000215661,0.00006565521,0.000020696214,0.00007043777,0.0055549163,0.000029290642,0.00520004,0.47417283,0.47739604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022710296,0.0019364402,0.032812618,0.00042989093,0.00006401827,0.00008296535,0.0003947386,0.016308296,0.0002479344,0.016602715,0.92851514,0.0003342104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012947197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038409003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47706184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000455901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000682096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966156},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2150897866","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002","title":"Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Consistency (knowledge bases); Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data science; Publication; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.8625684102688479,"score_gpt":0.6369410142134144,"score_spread":0.22562739605543347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150897866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615881,0.0022181908,0.4349326,0.00013351964,0.0006724619,0.00007362675,0.0000043350547,0.0000015059006,0.00037563278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97607017,0.0012683419,0.022322671,0.0001675551,0.00015703747,4.19767e-7,4.2564298e-7,0.000004980884,0.000008424648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194014,0.0008160906,0.0019500357,0.00014713588,0.0048192125,0.00032740814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023029,0.086997874,0.0027231907,0.0004984051,0.0071674604,0.0003101496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08664001,0.000123222,0.00041758054,0.01888852,0.00035187474,0.0015906361,0.0023434958,0.00008944279,0.00030318118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17506737,0.00005168754,0.00024581308,0.07359594,0.0001724134,0.0010907243,0.00034796426,0.00071054953,0.000004361861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021126788,0.000049223167,0.27211764,0.0000010286726,0.00006666061,0.0000036340602,0.004415684,0.00008648844,0.00014133003,0.00023751201,0.0036487414,0.7190208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026388853,0.0006688722,0.94814044,0.000025861615,0.000017666032,0.00008378363,0.0072478727,0.0105721485,0.0042047314,0.02746362,0.0011812288,0.00012990696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002950919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009245669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7188909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072107985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028029107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151102493","doi":"10.1186/1742-6413-3-5","title":"First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 - open access, peer-review, and impact factor.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CytoJournal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Atlanta; Task force; Library science; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.6114807811919001,"score_gpt":0.6231446032566216,"score_spread":0.011663822064721496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151102493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5509195,0.23509632,0.0028237214,0.13278407,0.0022594496,0.0034313,0.0013656648,0.000077833,0.07124216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93092114,0.025413277,0.00079484656,0.0010591173,0.0007188098,0.000029777673,0.00003161579,0.000053247055,0.0409782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98083127,0.0005345666,0.0020601035,0.001059949,0.01422447,0.0012896223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419577,0.002128677,0.00095759664,0.0009921303,0.010684192,0.0010416633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042616665,0.0004460659,0.0012539022,0.025159325,0.0006631736,0.02004724,0.008497051,0.00020572176,0.007885714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046603706,0.00027908848,0.0003780862,0.08803874,0.00022298303,0.004890983,0.0034120071,0.0012198257,0.00032442957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019292622,0.000120982375,0.44659477,0.000023195256,0.000013399725,0.0000961475,0.000014339496,0.00004059811,0.000026183234,0.000036239442,0.5298043,0.023210533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008823758,0.00012448111,0.655201,0.00021277048,0.000022071117,0.0002850117,0.000023223069,0.00037474692,0.000043645836,0.0043892306,0.33813387,0.00030755374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023976532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009859188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38000163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057917053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006376731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151897275","doi":"10.1126/science.1227833","title":"Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Library science; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.783301739546172,"score_gpt":0.6359530430485998,"score_spread":0.1473486964975722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151897275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98890823,0.001397682,0.0005921471,0.00043524723,0.0027791094,0.00029488595,0.000023868755,0.000017843684,0.00555101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911864,0.000055846587,0.0011718958,0.00002030242,0.00021652291,0.0000076217952,9.4550165e-7,0.000009609076,0.007330873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95702255,0.0006658746,0.0010703937,0.0011255969,0.037899263,0.0022163305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812799,0.0027912615,0.00042503307,0.0019197491,0.011639932,0.0019440872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23810688,0.00016029725,0.00034733454,0.09588808,0.0019209089,0.006116265,0.007908908,0.000116466515,0.0014452637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07296355,0.00010507705,0.0001553119,0.3200043,0.0035538909,0.004446513,0.0027320294,0.00065527513,0.00066619215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008070227,0.00016008064,0.8555443,0.000008358082,0.00000195089,0.0000055004757,0.00053884566,0.0000033832566,0.07882199,0.00018675027,0.008712649,0.05600808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015580349,0.0000828545,0.9508562,0.000057922323,0.0000018277665,0.000011880917,0.000925859,0.0011256564,0.036222193,0.0040772553,0.006335613,0.00014695061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013592423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020061463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22411624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026143336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084564276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152466862","doi":"10.1109/picmet.2008.4599678","title":"Nanotechnology: Canada&amp;#x2019;s position in scientific publications and patents","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Futures studies; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Position (finance); Nanotechnology; Impact of nanotechnology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Business; Materials science","score_opus":0.669508814797446,"score_gpt":0.5325534175232226,"score_spread":0.13695539727422334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152466862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877629,0.00020408942,0.0021457863,0.0064000553,0.00026842547,0.00014654377,0.000020543595,0.000024595376,0.0030270151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824901,0.000067947614,0.0018898539,0.0001294274,0.0000076264014,0.000010101453,0.000009468649,0.00000355074,0.015391926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439883,0.00007354061,0.00040511735,0.00061075715,0.004096307,0.00041544417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969133,0.0007302274,0.00008395414,0.0006080384,0.0014299403,0.00023450702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530272,0.00007752516,0.0001421072,0.047208797,0.000493129,0.0010308219,0.0010426599,0.000088963956,0.00040291762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011128087,0.000055661196,0.000024241515,0.15956116,0.00033306103,0.0005023093,0.00040779103,0.00016469369,0.00013498387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040323193,0.000112291666,0.895293,0.0000012034366,0.0000031559882,0.0000055442897,0.0000651038,0.00000819985,0.0049709613,0.003534348,0.07204624,0.023955928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023659176,0.000020460568,0.82375365,0.000002075727,7.119009e-7,0.00004380937,0.00009731595,0.00059301115,0.00050016877,0.0050151013,0.16961654,0.00012056528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11785515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4129069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29505175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017068577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007385574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152757094","doi":"10.1177/1094428107300202","title":"Deconstructing Scholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Research Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Structuring; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Scholarship; Craft; Citation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Tacit knowledge; Computer science; Citation analysis; Knowledge management; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.9114990024173193,"score_gpt":0.791205183478571,"score_spread":0.12029381893874824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152757094","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18085958,0.00069306506,0.72688776,0.0015317097,0.0006925084,0.00029182283,0.00000934582,0.00005890707,0.08897528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5683432,0.00003841533,0.42752185,0.00010779367,0.0002902911,0.0000027836163,0.000005497901,0.00002415359,0.003665978],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722204,0.003283605,0.0010031201,0.0009945142,0.021056745,0.0014415714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8487735,0.11112407,0.00027350814,0.0015052747,0.036688212,0.0016354299],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.39854023,0.00012860479,0.00024125977,0.059936,0.0010865441,0.0030643165,0.0031923638,0.00018329051,0.007537023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63695246,0.00009778562,0.000084290565,0.31341106,0.00049139495,0.0008352364,0.0014442388,0.0010167364,0.0016062425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016140413,0.000058242273,0.27151906,0.0000024249362,0.000009855752,0.00001824227,0.00007373972,0.000005780306,0.019698616,0.087338254,0.0022908235,0.6189688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036137964,0.0000926485,0.4848058,0.000008071372,0.0000019548593,0.00005814807,0.00093599973,0.00068411394,0.0667886,0.3557685,0.09025416,0.00024063063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001849223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009075713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61872816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032651183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007250163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154885740","doi":"10.7202/1002418ar","title":"Les collaborations de recherche en génétique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.925733851711418,"score_gpt":0.6559641779474439,"score_spread":0.2697696737639741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154885740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32923687,0.02212892,0.2856203,0.011579593,0.0014278089,0.0010880023,0.00026086427,0.00022904613,0.3484286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26917696,0.09310577,0.47601178,0.0027269826,0.0006231448,0.00028147158,0.000028403818,0.00010755122,0.15793794],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86189395,0.13003305,0.0013885264,0.0015959677,0.0024457339,0.0026427817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.827355,0.16371518,0.0006011912,0.0016175971,0.004933977,0.0017770336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3754637,0.00050160836,0.00074772665,0.012567565,0.00074053154,0.0009726575,0.004052671,0.023515057,0.0039094836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55255705,0.0004483019,0.00045943342,0.094347015,0.0027209884,0.00070366997,0.00045872692,0.021787647,0.00088591827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012503585,0.00078958465,0.03864076,0.000087851025,0.00025632264,0.00020575606,0.058059342,0.000048066944,0.005558113,0.25186887,0.025533073,0.6188272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008317173,0.0010057125,0.024589559,0.000091752874,0.00010214286,0.00013097494,0.06302947,0.0026161436,0.022440488,0.78462905,0.099404834,0.0011281553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019689146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021705072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6176991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017846001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013279567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156031982","doi":"10.1002/meet.14504301194","title":"Dispelling the Myths Behind First‐author Citation Counts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; CONTEST; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.15533327020605367,"score_gpt":0.45202705366638746,"score_spread":0.2966937834603338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156031982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667077,0.00009079301,0.002017677,0.018755203,0.00017928092,0.00044306976,0.00002090985,0.000035944235,0.0117494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972844,0.00005109553,0.0021162885,0.00023882068,0.000018543366,0.000014640408,3.826514e-7,0.0000018617868,0.00027393043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684757,0.0000016642624,0.0003322627,0.00015468494,0.0024086672,0.0002551744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948349,0.00036923517,0.00056358275,0.00014207115,0.0040563107,0.000033903474],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007996656,0.00005682994,0.00011282515,0.003765244,0.00065210095,0.000707334,0.0014800996,0.000038108643,0.000004345281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006966405,0.00002901839,0.0000799066,0.06277739,0.0023655614,0.0012467029,0.00031441145,0.00010434539,0.000014402119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016375192,0.000046713376,0.06989797,0.000035519377,0.000017775707,1.618458e-8,0.0019929057,0.000028883054,0.006184511,0.22583914,0.20357135,0.49236882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038791183,0.00022279203,0.05453779,0.00001686367,0.000019212215,0.000011374781,0.026109936,0.045022514,0.013375332,0.0982134,0.7618346,0.00024828204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018272312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.8485837e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55826324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053612377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010412228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156534767","doi":"","title":"INTERNATIONAL RESOURCE COORDINATION: A CISTI PERSPECTIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Resource (disambiguation); Reputation; Key (lock); Information resource; Business; Knowledge management; Information sharing; Shared resource; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.33300162853314974,"score_gpt":0.4719960576210073,"score_spread":0.13899442908785758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156534767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08918147,0.0008001796,0.013162398,0.0049496903,0.0030054874,0.000694643,0.0002483474,0.00022164658,0.88773614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95456153,0.000018592144,0.0006626065,0.00005614528,0.000545648,0.0000021958192,0.000022408303,0.000015755235,0.044115126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051356,0.00059180165,0.00048449088,0.00082353444,0.0067129093,0.00087370304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912151,0.002208673,0.00037850693,0.0008708443,0.004465982,0.00086086104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014058515,0.00023670302,0.0004086393,0.02696573,0.00061810465,0.001252827,0.0032684035,0.00020127626,0.0012084899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011231422,0.00021238993,0.00028138683,0.05421981,0.00022391237,0.0020061908,0.0011518088,0.00038299023,0.0024056933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038913675,0.00075895584,0.17069684,0.000055262793,0.00029061284,0.00027484976,0.0047508497,0.0000856377,0.00053124584,0.37055203,0.43525684,0.016357752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089398253,0.00006281799,0.046918716,0.000025889864,0.000020590232,0.000077385295,0.033100847,0.0018194941,0.00010731402,0.00021416368,0.9164581,0.00030071897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034945132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013230719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86538005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021005296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019289872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158588742","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2270","title":"PhD students’ excellence scholarships and their relationship with research productivity, scientific impact, and degree completion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Publication; Productivity; Government (linguistics); Population; Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.792646206224124,"score_gpt":0.5814627304881991,"score_spread":0.21118347573592489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158588742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98837644,0.0058180303,0.000060006547,0.0043392815,0.00061494485,0.00029582108,0.000005610054,0.0000020339153,0.0004878561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928414,0.000021310254,0.00031286431,0.000029368864,0.00015310531,0.000008040496,0.0000018975747,0.000008172762,0.006623837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949151,0.0005705523,0.0004019115,0.00039920644,0.0032526187,0.00046057152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875649,0.0017179968,0.00026925167,0.00043627343,0.00863634,0.0013752435],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021515168,0.00010631821,0.00017976479,0.029506551,0.0009673689,0.008134964,0.0009818929,0.00006570062,0.00042967516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074959383,0.00006412389,0.000033550805,0.03592685,0.000684271,0.0019827278,0.00009262684,0.0005840037,0.00005670162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005794247,0.000049980812,0.9570874,0.0000041654607,0.0000073229794,0.0000015277113,0.00052127434,0.0000026159455,0.00029240572,0.00022505889,0.023560468,0.018241981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015025008,0.00018011518,0.96549755,0.00003307807,0.0000029479456,0.00007381111,0.00088799774,0.00001519973,0.000053503747,0.01488087,0.018147072,0.000077577184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030058746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022865364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018164404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033107746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003065532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158654089","doi":"10.1002/meet.2014.14505101097","title":"Weighted in‐text citations and research impact patterns: A case study of library and information science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Digital library; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Citation impact; Information science; Data science; Library science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.17294049011234358,"score_gpt":0.5023219081214956,"score_spread":0.329381418009152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158654089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973624,0.000019628787,0.000089036286,0.0013881578,0.000023015733,0.00060927065,0.000015030925,0.000013992837,0.00047951072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984709,0.0001700124,0.0012226978,0.00009194019,0.0000038112692,0.00003474403,2.6327507e-7,0.0000019895667,0.0000036174033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523664,0.000013396896,0.0006381214,0.00026361804,0.003415719,0.00043251598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99234974,0.0009544982,0.00069576874,0.00022979084,0.005627846,0.00014237355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01993045,0.000087679764,0.00023792303,0.027983012,0.0007805578,0.0012344234,0.001391378,0.00004871163,0.0000014760756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015581575,0.000053862583,0.00004054028,0.17254059,0.005981034,0.017915927,0.0014738603,0.0002156451,5.921503e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020845338,0.00006797853,0.63835496,0.000043240372,0.0000073629517,7.9214495e-8,0.009079488,0.0000019039751,0.0023730106,0.017595448,0.00025258333,0.3322031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001322494,0.002338151,0.5708394,0.000036373694,0.0000095978885,0.00013627214,0.35556006,0.05093989,0.0050493977,0.011574709,0.0019828624,0.00021076936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014870126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018875443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34648058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050582636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031880065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158857852","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2013.772879","title":"Evaluating research – peer review team assessment and journal based bibliographic measures: New Zealand PBRF research output scores in 2006","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Economic Papers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tertiary Education Commission; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Weighting; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7149813458606749,"score_gpt":0.6179681557462509,"score_spread":0.097013190114424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158857852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8533228,0.019974232,0.000044605422,0.087634295,0.0010178937,0.002801321,0.00004386024,0.00004202137,0.03511899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79512537,0.0645181,0.0036570507,0.0012518087,0.0013549669,0.00018435325,0.000028619817,0.0001019008,0.13377781],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750046,0.0033765533,0.0018582569,0.0015612721,0.015955497,0.0022438176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747168,0.01426902,0.00049294124,0.0015290297,0.006181823,0.0028104093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20060082,0.00032341908,0.0008220938,0.12830275,0.0008377927,0.007981418,0.0027719883,0.00025245294,0.0035880494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033340428,0.00022888524,0.00024060463,0.10431452,0.00044357008,0.0012477627,0.00072474557,0.0021970596,0.0008518017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019866602,0.00003770927,0.28291404,0.000013522241,0.000014838325,0.00000546609,0.000082428814,0.00010618963,0.00016928185,0.0000127629,0.56231636,0.15430753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027388588,0.0006330152,0.6663533,0.00042057,0.000010915534,0.000035427714,0.00046898832,0.0060196626,0.000020111596,0.010738877,0.31219703,0.00036324447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015033708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001928628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38343924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069204153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039327303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159807730","doi":"10.1162/leon_a_00780","title":"Hybrids Are Hubs: Transdisciplinarity, the Two Cultures and the Special Status of Artscientists","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leonardo","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; The arts; Sociology; Computer science; Visual arts; Epistemology; Social science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2731534115275208,"score_gpt":0.5273399428156164,"score_spread":0.25418653128809554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159807730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402573,0.0020501637,0.003148928,0.019458706,0.0013737128,0.00050378137,0.00009003149,0.00001706066,0.033100277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710256,0.0002586887,0.0001646753,0.00018756716,0.0005155301,0.00000815786,0.0000013916501,0.000005896545,0.00175553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919679,0.00055165216,0.0005158077,0.0005114135,0.0058711534,0.00058205496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929452,0.0047376235,0.0002559694,0.0007985857,0.0010160616,0.0002465442],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017592823,0.00013332312,0.00032961761,0.004781681,0.0006154885,0.0015822094,0.0020065454,0.00004883652,0.00029139896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011681961,0.00005412359,0.00017914745,0.03540694,0.0015756373,0.00022352573,0.00063999795,0.00026657604,0.000064036045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003153476,0.00024976264,0.20195886,0.000020561993,0.000053887128,0.000013490692,0.006222678,0.00020254313,0.00039251006,0.18331513,0.08399118,0.52326405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027603663,0.00016591571,0.5486411,0.0000149212065,0.00002135793,0.000023212711,0.004923902,0.0049035456,0.00062075397,0.111984015,0.32572597,0.00021497982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014797911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033878788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52304906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002431029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006707929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160622038","doi":"10.3905/jot.2009.4.3.087","title":"TCA Benchmarks: <i>One or Many?</i>","year":2009,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Trading","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadians Living with HIV","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Simplicity; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Trading strategy; Database transaction; Econometrics; Business; Economics; Database; Finance","score_opus":0.6057244644135725,"score_gpt":0.554667195559239,"score_spread":0.05105726885433348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160622038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732955,0.034954175,0.009755055,0.042207614,0.004081264,0.00045734705,0.000025327494,0.000012716699,0.035211015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843797,0.01026871,0.0013817655,0.00086676073,0.0008683356,1.8654735e-7,3.0993465e-7,0.000011455906,0.0022227806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835739,0.00078476727,0.0018578689,0.00030984095,0.012528084,0.0009455243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98578674,0.008982414,0.0014149938,0.000743046,0.0023171508,0.00075566774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0642516,0.00025140023,0.000702825,0.033139464,0.0006726891,0.003031684,0.0062344167,0.00016783594,0.005452209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018938782,0.00012166237,0.00041675792,0.121833004,0.0002270601,0.0011638757,0.00027278738,0.00125216,0.00016610026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011361399,0.00081846345,0.0016458642,0.000020396377,0.00017574147,0.00034227662,0.0023456053,0.00014187348,0.017229846,0.0010820836,0.34408945,0.63097227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010137976,0.022669937,0.33341935,0.0019599083,0.0011399002,0.0071505383,0.016671017,0.061554253,0.01914132,0.09576043,0.42805102,0.0023443429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014829194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024883502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6286279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022460139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058836915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161109463","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2008.08.005","title":"What Weight Does Impact Factor Carry?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Dietetic Association","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Tempest; Quarter (Canadian coin); Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.33075860097685605,"score_gpt":0.5342452079784407,"score_spread":0.2034866070015846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161109463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988826,0.00042078778,0.00023574468,0.008508879,0.0017175452,0.00007589452,0.000012827112,0.0000045461393,0.00019779678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940657,0.0022234893,0.00020375047,0.00021171375,0.00030663252,6.587275e-7,1.6294095e-7,0.000007962916,0.0029799228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825383,0.00056703365,0.00079671206,0.00019516105,0.009786723,0.00040051923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809236,0.0042975848,0.0033532714,0.0004026808,0.0035932143,0.00026090236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00848769,0.000118394004,0.00046235335,0.007910698,0.0002988805,0.0010576112,0.0018536089,0.000049723636,0.00019811258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03347805,0.00004893838,0.00059757364,0.04867642,0.00017338352,0.0011248852,0.00024110096,0.0003898147,0.000060902352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026463074,0.000081540995,0.91813135,5.467548e-7,0.00008303137,0.000007552546,0.0004048096,0.00004965129,0.0008342431,0.000002424017,0.03890743,0.04147094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022367464,0.00026046432,0.98987365,0.000010495013,0.000013847068,0.000020044872,0.0005803361,0.00032041618,0.0006834113,0.0009375892,0.006993312,0.00008277916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007494306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072409343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07174227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010100306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035192506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161381384","doi":"10.5539/mas.v8n5p169","title":"Economic Growth and Internet Usage Impact on Publication Productivity among ASEAN’s and World’s Best Universities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Elite; Product (mathematics); Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.18551035624753337,"score_gpt":0.44481743263059337,"score_spread":0.25930707638306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161381384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95447093,0.000024033332,0.009771873,0.00051484257,0.0000977573,0.00021074135,0.000010153989,0.000029188908,0.0348705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978631,0.000010983359,0.00023238684,0.000059398084,0.000041508687,0.0000065861664,8.923552e-7,0.000007402504,0.00177773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954255,0.00007798724,0.00025407752,0.0011717441,0.0025777773,0.0004929129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972085,0.0011157638,0.00017591154,0.00059396314,0.00042854276,0.00047732273],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013594069,0.00015292654,0.00021438075,0.023162996,0.00041195418,0.003953249,0.0014834264,0.00004176579,0.0000662287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021217267,0.000107771,0.000033826105,0.026495196,0.0015069336,0.0015083273,0.0008705304,0.00018622659,0.00011443635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013426878,0.0002669862,0.508628,0.000016529446,0.000017573304,0.0000024756228,0.0018193733,0.0003331136,0.025997983,0.0829204,0.0039639575,0.37589934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003553938,0.00018589529,0.6943123,0.0000061729693,0.0000041857047,0.0000034688617,0.00025981982,0.27990955,0.0060284976,0.017875534,0.0007852121,0.0002739864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032028242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009784587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37562537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027329798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002371283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162094378","doi":"10.1007/s10645-019-09339-9","title":"Creative Careers: The Life Cycles of Nobel Laureates in Economics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Economist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Institute on Aging; Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; Universiteit Maastricht; Directorate for Education and Human Resources; York University; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Dartmouth College; University of Connecticut; Ohio State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Creativity; Work (physics); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Social science; Economics; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.35685785387935437,"score_gpt":0.49313113928266655,"score_spread":0.13627328540331218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162094378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565261,0.0003602052,0.000031115793,0.0009526714,0.00016110753,0.00017071977,0.00004811337,0.00000425345,0.04174569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997438,0.00019276225,0.000119365475,0.00020372291,0.000036739977,0.000008055193,0.0000021156702,0.000006613485,0.0019925907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981742,0.00010349762,0.0005337199,0.00037950484,0.00048601808,0.00032308104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545145,0.0032268187,0.00022998326,0.00061113364,0.0003190745,0.00016152512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077397143,0.00009149578,0.00029466336,0.008535802,0.00005393412,0.00060396316,0.0015878036,0.00007311764,0.00091956434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055177175,0.000059096536,0.00010902341,0.012892041,0.0001500292,0.00030685766,0.00027106208,0.00014019545,0.00045737278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024105982,0.00004267175,0.97731704,0.000002930148,0.000016989,9.148467e-7,0.0004214412,0.0013662863,0.000058259986,0.003727012,0.0019735654,0.015048781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057494885,0.00008001608,0.9520998,0.0000054844527,0.0000031480304,0.000001708098,0.0033771635,0.016599335,0.0012165136,0.008397272,0.01751233,0.00013227873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009818121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033508314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04091191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012949176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027418457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163445888","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.007","title":"Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; Royal Victoria Hospital; McGill University; Concordia University; Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Peering; Consistency (knowledge bases); Peer review; Competition (biology); Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Operations research; Political science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; The Internet","score_opus":0.8991065089653524,"score_gpt":0.6875258783341166,"score_spread":0.21158063063123578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163445888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961865,0.021371806,0.055125788,0.02331009,0.0007360134,0.00053904334,0.000067346205,0.000009069628,0.0026543906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288137,0.006512315,0.0077826725,0.0004331908,0.0002404054,0.000006149685,0.0000048693646,0.000009536093,0.0021295191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815195,0.003334501,0.00883089,0.00044795155,0.005344554,0.00052256125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7198996,0.23538652,0.019854719,0.0011254871,0.023085015,0.00064867234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26742163,0.00013390939,0.0029517398,0.006507877,0.000083447565,0.000023204962,0.0016154458,0.00023022896,0.00018442751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58142024,0.00007536149,0.0006608711,0.031324867,0.00048003666,0.00016993897,0.00029149288,0.00064255996,0.000015104227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012085138,0.00032378887,0.92883897,0.00008223888,0.00008592678,0.000010628125,0.000005668323,0.0002567013,0.00016025179,0.002419074,0.03625795,0.03143796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081415515,0.00066462666,0.96765757,0.0004663775,0.000053187214,0.00003089973,0.000011290316,0.00040178845,0.000047575206,0.013108667,0.016648795,0.0000950822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007457647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041909774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31399864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008322885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023212084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163542241","doi":"10.1108/ilds-02-2015-0004","title":"Document supply of grey literature and open access: ten years later","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interlending & Document Supply","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Intermediation; Business; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.3749393279018769,"score_gpt":0.5661691548216926,"score_spread":0.19122982691981572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163542241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98440576,0.0022875108,0.00016948435,0.0035397247,0.0010708718,0.00078291586,0.00012511073,0.00003135891,0.0075872624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891095,0.00040599066,0.0016345042,0.00025812845,0.00008752823,0.00003938603,0.00002503681,0.000022738528,0.008417166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916027,0.00029543365,0.0010385095,0.0010063715,0.0053414665,0.0007155165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521995,0.0010391447,0.00040161176,0.0009197085,0.0017018109,0.0007177954],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012266174,0.00027204354,0.0005821538,0.02104426,0.00011110278,0.021432744,0.0064771725,0.00014669367,0.0018324768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042620436,0.00019058732,0.00014551527,0.03412834,0.00019769791,0.006323716,0.0071085338,0.0003520759,0.00026102868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021947072,0.00015749993,0.65542656,0.000023785718,0.000095379524,0.00012615204,0.0036879305,0.00001408064,0.0004666107,0.002440976,0.20461218,0.13272938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004185754,0.0014597552,0.4029323,0.0004614268,0.000045149965,0.00010907771,0.0020641661,0.00027217876,0.008236688,0.13417561,0.44516674,0.00089117023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063604116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004161968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25249428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022321289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001807287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164150962","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1050038","title":"Importance of open access for clinicians and researchers in developing countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Developing country; Institution; World Wide Web; Medical education; Computer science; Data science; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6771114568177119,"score_gpt":0.6308608858162836,"score_spread":0.046250571001428264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164150962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064943726,0.0010404184,0.00019687632,0.9892457,0.00061617343,0.00041705812,0.0002502641,0.000001887223,0.0017372466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020002355,0.0114080915,0.0011172317,0.9769685,0.0040347204,0.000035335182,0.000037377118,0.000033464094,0.0043650162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98240626,0.00060470385,0.0016962879,0.00051904906,0.013703577,0.0010701361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97759986,0.013290721,0.0011676025,0.00026839838,0.006477664,0.0011957276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08749002,0.00015381916,0.0006561445,0.03445287,0.00029698657,0.008224606,0.0069359937,0.0011106874,0.0013969145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19632892,0.000121305726,0.00011835667,0.038243793,0.00015828808,0.0012807793,0.0006749996,0.002868996,0.00002092529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046508935,0.0000038099834,0.18529542,0.000010904657,0.00002070038,0.00018562429,0.000052976942,6.185331e-7,2.1768304e-8,0.00006613645,0.7731959,0.041163214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054239185,0.000031038035,0.05919122,0.00011889374,0.000003389683,0.000023953175,0.0000999217,0.00020220884,9.1735683e-7,0.0029217845,0.93672925,0.00013503594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042985477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108329594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16353332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022847808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019711634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164185547","doi":"10.1109/icaict.2009.5372593","title":"Delineation of landscapes of emerging sciences through publication data: A case of nanoscience in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Data science; Emerging technologies; Process (computing); Computer science; Nanotechnology; Materials science","score_opus":0.6696666563456042,"score_gpt":0.600067926031835,"score_spread":0.06959873031376917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164185547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98613495,0.00030021102,0.008611522,0.0011514527,0.00008606933,0.00011416178,0.000052746636,0.0000022805225,0.0035465867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950692,0.000076286546,0.0047253594,0.000049585,0.000006108429,6.6505913e-7,0.000004069789,9.941849e-7,0.00006772859],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938634,0.00009164655,0.00096240314,0.0004422716,0.004399841,0.00024045666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994925,0.0014366831,0.00048152875,0.000645551,0.0024419336,0.000069277965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013249787,0.00006059796,0.00023483403,0.014770444,0.000072136114,0.00014153922,0.002193024,0.000026666556,0.00012647851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022695567,0.000039910487,0.000024324945,0.15280806,0.0001353074,0.001423486,0.00029342633,0.00005491026,9.362656e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022535276,0.00034027486,0.47984654,0.000020417017,0.0000054465704,0.000029038289,0.00059304957,0.0025838204,0.013228261,0.012941616,0.00996629,0.4804227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008042746,0.0004753944,0.22521213,0.000042887525,0.000007011828,0.000076244025,0.009347131,0.6950686,0.05967363,0.0062621515,0.0027487571,0.00028181676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.657305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.574614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69248474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060137987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017097117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165122403","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z","title":"Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":506,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Bibliometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Database; Bibliographic database; Computer science; Data science; Humanities; Library science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.8593883432201264,"score_gpt":0.609782680977184,"score_spread":0.24960566224294234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165122403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622965,0.002488917,0.0007473676,0.0009150481,0.0009381889,0.00036706106,0.00007395211,0.000014547473,0.032158423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974456,0.00004071513,0.000840781,0.00013877799,0.00020497724,0.000010502574,0.0000063023595,0.000006962935,0.0013053843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785785,0.0006287548,0.0010892374,0.0010849964,0.017603062,0.0010154401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97927314,0.016922055,0.00061378593,0.0008311887,0.0022730045,0.00008680503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1096677,0.00019499946,0.0003290084,0.09872509,0.003340084,0.008372738,0.0050019273,0.00006397161,0.000053477812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042466298,0.00009916171,0.0001264725,0.48992166,0.0042155017,0.0010241781,0.0010909914,0.00035715642,0.00002100305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013964016,0.0005389262,0.64587545,0.000038921375,0.0000094992565,0.00002085178,0.005744464,0.00029302444,0.00083869847,0.15052934,0.044210084,0.15188676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055380835,0.0002009237,0.84608567,0.00003439848,0.000014937524,0.000020836429,0.012896725,0.008677776,0.0006360377,0.012397576,0.11810393,0.0003774033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061841053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032557797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39119658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088103574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032179165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165199772","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2014.906018","title":"Institutional Repository Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Bibliometrics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17762022938427158,"score_gpt":0.46057300947454993,"score_spread":0.28295278009027836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165199772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8809899,0.0047577764,0.04497075,0.0057980553,0.0013665687,0.00022929847,0.000022640896,0.00047525766,0.061389755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895456,0.00008582844,0.008011172,0.00019785523,0.000077066594,0.000018925342,0.0000036565286,0.0000065712507,0.0020533549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862791,0.00015116176,0.00081756694,0.0015925101,0.0101179145,0.001041793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139374,0.0018973226,0.00035225812,0.0020635473,0.0037993619,0.00049378816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01882721,0.00022228868,0.0004908805,0.92687315,0.00229564,0.01096464,0.008373616,0.00031774727,0.00017000115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076224014,0.00015239247,0.00023763938,0.98962593,0.007850381,0.004880622,0.0023679053,0.0005473448,0.00026764983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001099625,0.00011671116,0.42810312,0.000003197399,0.000051215433,0.00003434916,0.00009127338,0.00017253585,0.004581048,0.38154042,0.0019356724,0.18335944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032927078,0.00026629385,0.5336683,0.000011919255,0.00004705872,0.00008879257,0.00020125396,0.016669462,0.029478699,0.35302377,0.06577636,0.00043882613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013419695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002324511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18292062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010716882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000958069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165346621","doi":"10.1108/oir-11-2014-0276","title":"Factiva and Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Online Information Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Manitoba Health Research Council","keywords":"Newspaper; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.6249148270559952,"score_gpt":0.5820916801924584,"score_spread":0.04282314686353683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165346621","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13902296,0.37952843,0.008000918,0.13612753,0.0023638327,0.0039887917,0.0022832407,0.00016465857,0.3285196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60365117,0.31690225,0.014481631,0.050441872,0.00044503258,0.00008112634,0.000858373,0.00003735386,0.013101212],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958691,0.000083862134,0.00065443496,0.00014399395,0.0029766127,0.00027198918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958634,0.0003988412,0.00019408192,0.0003598277,0.002309051,0.0008748312],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008846702,0.00008991079,0.0002404297,0.013535838,0.0001106361,0.001152258,0.0006191956,0.00005318832,0.00047229993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030355923,0.000057226684,0.00004465006,0.039347738,0.000054761967,0.002251304,0.00016009492,0.00013728895,0.00084716757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018717116,0.000008547802,0.0065726675,0.00006949749,0.0000037003813,0.0000012054027,0.00009571584,0.0000029119108,4.209193e-7,0.0004933046,0.23692004,0.7558301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017212862,0.000031191386,0.009292806,0.000075253934,0.000003230279,0.000011765536,0.00035169924,0.00075251167,0.0000030470937,0.00071446423,0.9885108,0.00008111204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060316664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005203732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010471109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062182226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165402917","doi":"10.1177/0011392113498866","title":"The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Centrality; Economic geography; Homogeneous; Globalization; Regional science; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.6511783085238985,"score_gpt":0.6372542626474716,"score_spread":0.013924045876426816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165402917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99354196,0.0021203626,0.0009398503,0.0027488214,0.00026099905,0.00027122308,0.0000570846,0.0000020344944,0.00005765813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.00041834687,0.00022179766,0.000015415744,0.000028243165,0.00001846719,0.0000048466327,0.0000011864842,0.000004513663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953492,0.0011284975,0.0006741826,0.0003641511,0.0022801713,0.00020377961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882387,0.008104233,0.0007740696,0.00014961485,0.0027140446,0.000019370822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01458951,0.00006425014,0.00027974704,0.007240179,0.0006199469,0.00023406566,0.001015302,0.00006586731,0.000045772904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032724492,0.000037630758,0.00008011585,0.10075094,0.004505292,0.00046075598,0.00013634487,0.00009886477,0.0000050006042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022595215,0.00025816186,0.7274309,0.000013085919,0.00012546597,1.14918585e-7,0.0922212,0.00081728277,0.0039128996,0.13444515,0.007997771,0.032755423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008246536,0.00010673641,0.9376125,0.000006264945,0.000036449765,5.4236423e-8,0.029270902,0.0059950524,0.000054135337,0.02670858,0.000083647676,0.000043231936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028373455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014127298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21018162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036136113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003338032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166615779","doi":"10.18438/b81g7j","title":"Alignment of Citation Behaviors of Philosophy Graduate Students and Faculty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Graduate students; Rank (graph theory); Library science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.45540801981991147,"score_gpt":0.5250139115162369,"score_spread":0.06960589169632542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166615779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97915894,0.0002917585,0.0016459321,0.016674167,0.00008840292,0.00044621524,0.00003455847,0.000011653414,0.0016483668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352837,0.00088571303,0.0035012616,0.0019763184,0.000008546968,0.000015523896,0.000014058099,0.000002368521,0.00006786195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469453,0.00022593913,0.00078294415,0.00016535976,0.0039981045,0.00013313668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290866,0.004901891,0.0007898837,0.0002486885,0.0009803877,0.00017048836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005026638,0.00008189741,0.00015863845,0.0079491455,0.000085940395,0.0012096697,0.0005320332,0.000049578524,0.0002473801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016489549,0.000058637124,0.000034374596,0.017756538,0.00012487422,0.15164962,0.00030681142,0.000105781895,0.00004257394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051694555,0.00063822314,0.5289611,0.00030954185,0.000057839112,0.000002764477,0.0019922026,0.0002100554,0.0022506237,0.081601515,0.015810307,0.36764887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059654104,0.0005335651,0.9692091,0.00011678127,0.000019754549,0.000003935432,0.0021144685,0.0037931122,0.008852206,0.0034010524,0.011216669,0.0001428535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027661292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.302298e-9,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44024795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006361496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007771675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167860710","doi":"10.7202/1028999ar","title":"Le libre accès aux articles scientifiques : référentiels, principes, normes et modalités","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.4694380487945393,"score_gpt":0.5554607054139259,"score_spread":0.08602265661938657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167860710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5876177,0.0994457,0.038552582,0.12578371,0.008542057,0.0018476393,0.00053321733,0.0005193757,0.13715802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8538195,0.018560871,0.009488737,0.0031249109,0.00029023577,0.00008407136,0.00011892903,0.00007295686,0.11443978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982478,0.0020052989,0.0016272739,0.0016123402,0.010865659,0.0014113785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875016,0.002641478,0.0006749816,0.0011834513,0.0064432323,0.0015552621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03007829,0.00051104615,0.00063303165,0.106745854,0.00060172915,0.075108975,0.003012966,0.00034141197,0.006852475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141439615,0.00045684568,0.000333073,0.2559525,0.00087716384,0.044660512,0.0015080968,0.00061335426,0.0016026694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014500578,0.0016102127,0.044531286,0.00013027956,0.00013741005,0.00005784263,0.0063462174,0.0005404394,0.0031451269,0.37702084,0.41573584,0.1505995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020978893,0.00053286366,0.018496394,0.00016838529,0.00004144677,0.00003228663,0.006491103,0.006457552,0.031876955,0.13077347,0.8022139,0.00081775995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006968787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001023369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38647804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036312756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060497667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168948528","doi":"10.1002/meet.1450430198","title":"The current status of Open Access in biomedical field: the comparison of countries relating to the impact of national policies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Political science; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.2619999762952609,"score_gpt":0.5998809872742499,"score_spread":0.337881010978989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168948528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880569,0.00015341367,0.00019926262,0.01013229,0.00004498991,0.0004857682,0.000045328463,0.0000032925868,0.000878785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994362,0.00016272932,0.00028867027,0.0000741165,0.0000066911034,0.000023103008,3.6372157e-7,0.0000011452133,0.000007003251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550533,0.000008337891,0.00080654357,0.00012500111,0.0032255144,0.00032925548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900553,0.0021606917,0.0015095774,0.00018169881,0.0060520014,0.000040709838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013030564,0.000063142106,0.00023046872,0.0038377817,0.000460883,0.00070839527,0.005197238,0.000031017735,0.0000015602209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02244687,0.000024255247,0.000101972146,0.07888842,0.0041455207,0.0014643196,0.0022279208,0.00016485581,3.5252194e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046128964,0.00006662347,0.66221386,0.000021921715,0.000015685182,1.2378899e-9,0.0033932787,0.00013282294,0.0022343725,0.051115748,0.039857313,0.24090223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274059,0.0009842468,0.7638588,0.000061156614,0.000010480338,0.0000022582924,0.054471176,0.030472074,0.027738644,0.0489987,0.07261279,0.0001622602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013349979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018169969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24073997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102831706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066845986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169058265","doi":"10.1177/1098214009354774","title":"Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; Canadian Cancer Society","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Documentation; Management science; Medical education; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8412037386951862,"score_gpt":0.6852424986880619,"score_spread":0.1559612400071243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169058265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98805255,0.0010688794,0.00040047418,0.0072782896,0.0009979452,0.0011638785,0.000058386144,0.0000010829192,0.0009785158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987945,0.00021741693,0.00038606263,0.00007804685,0.00026496523,0.00012534331,0.000001919392,0.000008879927,0.00012284651],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.92335457,0.0031440994,0.001804564,0.00042780384,0.07057135,0.0006976436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8123634,0.015151732,0.00150251,0.0005794502,0.1701824,0.0002205035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45272475,0.00011645762,0.00033998647,0.05198887,0.00089619326,0.00051786576,0.0021179891,0.00005729633,0.00043851434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28436464,0.00006109954,0.00013465388,0.27616403,0.0014385205,0.000660463,0.00023992226,0.0009501457,0.0000030362287],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003175146,0.00020700159,0.0071733887,0.000017104281,0.00011817386,0.0000041833077,0.00047641055,0.0030652578,0.0077913282,0.0005833893,0.13014525,0.850101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007698217,0.008209094,0.20627739,0.00022821143,0.00030785662,0.0012185388,0.017935544,0.5235799,0.043585524,0.041519895,0.14872758,0.00071224605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05011414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044885606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8493888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011645157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020326532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169420254","doi":"10.1002/asi.23286","title":"Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of <scp>M</scp>endeley user categories","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Citation; Altmetrics; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Informetrics; Computer science; Library science; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.4475581076986923,"score_gpt":0.5463816071200864,"score_spread":0.09882349942139412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169420254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919325,0.000110176275,0.0023490093,0.0029538458,0.00036004907,0.00018651821,0.00002493229,0.000008636389,0.0020743322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855316,0.00008219098,0.00069873733,0.000070625174,0.000022643231,0.0000034960726,9.562237e-7,0.000002125653,0.0005660932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553276,0.00017972915,0.0011753794,0.00017203792,0.01248578,0.00045432788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351295,0.0041637076,0.0021372435,0.00051058666,0.05779346,0.00026545415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1165137,0.00007297668,0.00035221706,0.11123454,0.00048602355,0.0014899855,0.0027473045,0.00017763379,0.0000025819706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39067855,0.000042933083,0.00011305851,0.36464655,0.0006713009,0.0054934127,0.00052678946,0.00034908715,0.000007840712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001933465,0.000112874266,0.8338141,0.000005062594,0.0001506645,3.630117e-7,0.003223084,0.00066171587,0.0007218987,0.07420907,0.03095364,0.056128185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018564644,0.0016645299,0.45719495,0.000013117192,0.0002195764,0.000021238238,0.04684378,0.05260422,0.02446997,0.14333758,0.27162573,0.00014885237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030404855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021068474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37661916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005394485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011164853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171257228","doi":"10.22230/src.2013v4n2a86","title":"Availability and Accessibility of Research Outputs in NARS: A case study with IARI","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Work (physics); New delhi; Open access journal; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine; Geography; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7214859327264074,"score_gpt":0.6436624978410018,"score_spread":0.07782343488540555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171257228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918559,0.0028485185,0.00002686941,0.0019144088,0.000013995236,0.0018492896,0.000005667425,0.000009083841,0.0014762678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812806,0.0005904308,0.00077378156,0.000008198357,0.000008059228,0.00015604122,0.0000012879475,0.000007784601,0.0003263425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749307,0.011111804,0.00093534787,0.0010159508,0.011237068,0.0007691372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542624,0.0208279,0.00016265939,0.0033361022,0.020880926,0.0005300327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2280778,0.00011931038,0.0003325726,0.028879523,0.001069638,0.007278462,0.0027510382,0.00015591917,0.00015120243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087597296,0.00007519985,0.000027775519,0.09313285,0.0021548888,0.0048294533,0.004275287,0.0025032167,0.000041262352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008417195,0.0008908602,0.92587996,0.000022500035,0.000008558247,0.000041486393,0.0030254566,5.7624163e-7,0.00033071623,0.0002447014,0.00022152968,0.06924949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087767356,0.0010191404,0.93876755,0.000037695536,0.0000014322834,0.000049576218,0.040933207,0.0007859631,0.00015188937,0.017058102,0.00022548066,0.00009226524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018696351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044944943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1404805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001585236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000388734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171824286","doi":"10.1142/s1363919614500376","title":"INCORPORATING NETWORK ANALYSIS INTO EVALUATION OF 'BIG SCIENCE' PROJECTS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CANADIAN LIGHT SOURCE SYNCHROTRON","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Genome Prairie; Genome Canada; Canadian Light Source","keywords":"CLs upper limits; Social network analysis; Government (linguistics); Big data; Scale (ratio); Scientific instrument; Network science; Work (physics); Data science; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Social media; Telecommunications; Engineering; Complex network; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.358731749205141,"score_gpt":0.5731939792993171,"score_spread":0.21446223009417614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171824286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8830246,0.000020923844,0.10433932,0.0026058988,0.0013695277,0.00031793353,0.0000033844544,0.0000026572186,0.008315815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114764,0.000002604754,0.008453308,0.00013951612,0.00017246798,0.000004845789,0.000003457622,0.000004394029,0.00007175762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787366,0.0005648024,0.0018203813,0.00028273868,0.018373527,0.00022198795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590496,0.00034071377,0.0029444967,0.0004706789,0.037084114,0.00011042988],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11066038,0.000095514,0.00025234369,0.056035507,0.00028254266,0.0009209047,0.0032789889,0.00004264543,0.00007997071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011888444,0.00006136722,0.00011971787,0.15432279,0.00022708031,0.000723946,0.00043804976,0.00018149092,0.0000015216057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030659543,0.00014976464,0.39463702,0.000006298449,0.00044208442,0.0000012609372,0.00025978545,0.19237694,0.0019524354,0.04571362,0.00059517595,0.36383495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000510799,0.000166905,0.699993,0.000039732473,0.00010835301,0.0000021354915,0.000522715,0.27984703,0.0008974867,0.015336624,0.0024921955,0.000082983315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020857716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004696294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36375198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011066188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018345356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99643487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172274519","doi":"10.1186/1747-5341-2-31","title":"Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Order (exchange); Public relations; Open access publishing; Publishing; Research ethics; Public access; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.9706059074024417,"score_gpt":0.7823262368663919,"score_spread":0.18827967053604977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172274519","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012896121,0.0043191826,0.00069141213,0.24518628,0.47590917,0.012683531,0.0053009214,0.000030243442,0.24298313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2220657,0.022034718,0.0016447349,0.0044468977,0.7447476,0.00044744057,0.00038144228,0.00030017138,0.00393134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86379975,0.016703326,0.008019057,0.0042722225,0.104037695,0.0031679664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5956437,0.32494858,0.0015154062,0.0032760678,0.07292032,0.0016959286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.55059737,0.0006483388,0.0032591529,0.15218875,0.0018368929,0.0097732665,0.048076764,0.0042819986,0.0017033617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7402844,0.0004933289,0.00019035344,0.15043166,0.013495706,0.0025126128,0.07740454,0.036077168,0.000023221233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010433813,0.00058834313,0.00014101801,0.0016693283,0.000075514065,0.00066902646,0.04420565,0.0000054503357,0.000032175427,0.081058614,0.86675227,0.00375922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017378762,0.0031617417,0.00024283363,0.00338945,0.000032449458,0.000015561343,0.014421503,0.000022831922,0.00015023949,0.30879483,0.6675702,0.0004604811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06039604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02294028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30824527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057395303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011966141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177922050","doi":"10.16995/olh.72","title":"Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Library of Humanities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Birkbeck, University of London; Swansea University; University of Bristol; University of Aberdeen; Bangor University; Queen's University Belfast; Loughborough University; Ulster University; University of Birmingham; University of Glasgow; University of Sussex; European Commission; University of Leeds; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Newcastle University; University of Reading; University of Dundee; University of Bath; University of Warwick; University of Oxford; King's College London; University of St Andrews; University of Leicester; University of Exeter; University of Hull; University of Nottingham; Queen's University; University of East Anglia; Oxford Brookes University; University of Salford Manchester; Durham University; York University; Imperial College London; Queen Mary University of London; Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Obstacle; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Financial modeling; Underpinning; Financial services; Finance; Business; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.7697619440407077,"score_gpt":0.5354388920022558,"score_spread":0.23432305203845194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177922050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218918,0.0022998578,0.00095695024,0.021276401,0.00030551504,0.0014713024,0.0011083861,0.000018056555,0.05067175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123913,0.00037144884,0.003922849,0.00025355333,0.00007667527,0.00002515596,0.000066872446,0.000015471294,0.0040288623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949023,0.0004718757,0.0010438903,0.00048951205,0.0026792192,0.00041319797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796046,0.008083754,0.00071522215,0.002143921,0.0009950779,0.00010158826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021641292,0.00012216553,0.000360132,0.01294406,0.00036926058,0.019832244,0.025238877,0.00015777267,0.0008474963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056364372,0.000065123386,0.000062837615,0.025135446,0.00052199996,0.07716443,0.012713811,0.00050610927,0.0000074591035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016435192,0.00008008917,0.16944344,0.000036780828,0.000026294221,0.0000012827358,0.0025935539,0.000011385691,0.0011614326,0.21836281,0.4284961,0.17962247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016166586,0.00018229712,0.12931272,0.00022921503,0.000006986641,0.0000030048527,0.006531988,0.0016149104,0.0011180104,0.27749944,0.5816274,0.00025731252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011409548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007435204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17936516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003383239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007004633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181670068","doi":"","title":"THE DIVERSITY OF ONTARIO'S UNIVERSITIES: A Data Set to Inform the Differentiation Discussion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5763901703785713,"score_gpt":0.5139593011093159,"score_spread":0.06243086926925545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181670068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96842074,0.000014707892,0.0043243174,0.011583118,0.00028490648,0.00038782024,0.000049838964,0.000008522541,0.014926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349663,0.000009271068,0.00012036759,0.00010645311,0.000010549526,0.0000014310572,0.000008873742,0.0000014008677,0.06477533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941553,0.00008147753,0.00027363622,0.00026840056,0.0049673673,0.00025381902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944285,0.0024085212,0.0001372684,0.0015347903,0.0013163338,0.0001745665],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067223078,0.00006520359,0.00010459538,0.005448285,0.0012055964,0.0013626538,0.005736661,0.000034549954,0.0024903044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029733211,0.00001989272,0.000050760616,0.044389214,0.00012127256,0.0011050056,0.010109879,0.00011857684,0.00033701851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042232343,0.00007681726,0.3845462,0.0000024538797,0.0000401818,6.5885365e-7,0.0130331265,0.000034417666,0.00009404917,0.004712415,0.35499704,0.24242042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014423314,0.000063975254,0.81820494,0.0000021836302,0.000004349351,3.137192e-7,0.014661099,0.004294168,0.00005998806,0.0029536057,0.1595482,0.00006294874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052495226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028189851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43365875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027490425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039657936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183035778","doi":"","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration? Evidence from the Collapse of the Soviet Union","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soviet union; Political science; Field (mathematics); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.47957700236991097,"score_gpt":0.5621005811009048,"score_spread":0.08252357873099381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183035778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94161326,0.0003998046,0.0009790682,0.051543396,0.00084066077,0.0013246163,0.000054228105,0.000013472224,0.0032314963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911457,0.00009223309,0.00030100532,0.00061852136,0.00012728458,0.000050316907,0.0000017495134,0.000005796511,0.0076574017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229795,0.0014027801,0.0006361618,0.00045346853,0.004921712,0.00028795368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574969,0.031136476,0.00037648686,0.0022177538,0.00851448,0.0002579039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017701635,0.000121462755,0.00018114473,0.0036848078,0.0006065819,0.0027680907,0.0040830253,0.00007822896,0.0026257818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08729327,0.000032271502,0.00010299914,0.15400031,0.000229087,0.0008812845,0.0013227816,0.00017521449,0.0006368127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032495558,0.00011395784,0.37251478,0.0000028187906,0.000019557046,2.5071694e-7,0.003308376,0.000293685,0.007452127,0.0015762314,0.58113676,0.03354899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001875209,0.000068316556,0.93483305,0.00003112916,0.000009919293,3.2223224e-7,0.007051636,0.014556242,0.0049207737,0.011772883,0.026453527,0.00011465142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048484714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052720266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5623183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006727054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043497237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187745483","doi":"10.1893/0005-3155-86.1.38","title":"Publish your work and shape public policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BIOS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Work (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.8268935791649942,"score_gpt":0.5975813027778658,"score_spread":0.22931227638712837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187745483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9046068,0.0025558937,0.00023972086,0.05059496,0.00091499806,0.00019635317,0.000022633765,0.00006277077,0.040805865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916261,0.00005071254,0.00051610614,0.00050880364,0.0003662359,0.0000035554378,0.0000020088341,0.000007638398,0.0069188764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259937,0.00013576611,0.00034209687,0.0005293086,0.0058274674,0.00056601403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448174,0.0008998772,0.00011028507,0.0005876623,0.002718814,0.0012016015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014922097,0.00010268676,0.00017867137,0.05060627,0.00012967359,0.0077933054,0.0016626506,0.00008682276,0.0004225423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100914955,0.00006743404,0.000056833243,0.22586232,0.00015692423,0.0010741081,0.0009870058,0.00015024668,0.00073519815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064122264,0.000050151986,0.29406947,7.033385e-7,0.000004535699,0.0000070348146,0.00008524725,1.3644306e-7,0.000017869706,0.004572771,0.3401245,0.3610612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045669402,0.0000746758,0.229074,0.0000023173193,0.0000012869226,0.000007545731,0.00043619797,0.00048130733,0.000050618324,0.007978556,0.7612752,0.000161651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008383433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008622317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42115065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082002734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005163589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188594066","doi":"","title":"Grants, contracts and networks : What influences biotechnology scientific production","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Position (finance); Production (economics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Bibliometrics; Political science; Business; Economics; Library science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Microeconomics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.10272172311357791,"score_gpt":0.39698438326619945,"score_spread":0.29426266015262154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188594066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21686938,0.30184588,0.35011572,0.048365794,0.03251248,0.012741007,0.0005547135,0.0066704545,0.030324582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31320176,0.050518848,0.034285378,0.0013374701,0.0017933304,0.00073582097,0.000105330415,0.00092769624,0.59709436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896236,0.00033954481,0.0010615329,0.0023200307,0.005067141,0.0015881676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929792,0.001025999,0.0010954621,0.0028862539,0.0011725259,0.00084053096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01583629,0.0006276204,0.00094970036,0.07344364,0.00069799914,0.011746859,0.0035453208,0.0023096455,0.00059348677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018410832,0.0004908708,0.00022390379,0.068728335,0.0017295094,0.0013614183,0.001356489,0.0020074933,0.00013137153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037878308,0.0002421394,0.021399051,0.000024571491,0.000065978136,0.000053560165,0.000057856374,0.00013124791,0.0063886964,0.003153615,0.333863,0.6345824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005333887,0.00021716474,0.029542804,0.00024806935,0.000049358667,0.00023382828,0.00028963364,0.024252629,0.004324689,0.0054715765,0.9336844,0.0011524716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050329412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012604828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63342994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019832455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049462786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191930442","doi":"10.1186/s40409-015-0050-7","title":"CEVAP Journal: the first Brazilian electronic scientific publication turns 20 years old","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic journal; Library science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Computer science; Free access","score_opus":0.2921335545626442,"score_gpt":0.4622507825611149,"score_spread":0.17011722799847068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191930442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97263163,0.01525603,0.000823425,0.010099886,0.0006768374,0.00017584742,0.000031830412,0.000011461701,0.0002930629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777,0.0006886818,0.000067531975,0.000334899,0.00059122546,0.000002351961,0.0000010452218,0.000014452431,0.00052979053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924109,0.00041244613,0.0009513739,0.00033152185,0.0052287504,0.00066500437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247617,0.0020660076,0.0007779879,0.0005453344,0.0032584786,0.00087603135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009705965,0.00016929147,0.0003451993,0.0057259207,0.0011390669,0.0060244673,0.0027811052,0.0000811995,0.00011654938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01096495,0.000082828934,0.0002535011,0.019517893,0.00064673123,0.00065079966,0.00053659733,0.00067632494,0.00004790699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012409858,0.0020710204,0.44218194,0.000033019274,0.00042806537,0.00026643,0.004093005,0.00036778784,0.0021910649,0.017513545,0.37693983,0.15267332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009157139,0.001138807,0.4955997,0.000021992797,0.00008281462,0.00036017207,0.0007741291,0.0011691082,0.000039848157,0.035868194,0.4638458,0.0001837645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017588916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103779916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15248956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027145757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006978843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99736613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193586313","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.1257727.v1","title":"My experiences with open access publishing as an early-career researcher?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8895854941582424,"score_gpt":0.6538385036355054,"score_spread":0.23574699052273695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193586313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78948665,0.00018669845,0.000069772716,0.0016840105,0.00017220431,0.0009778305,0.013301746,0.00010217258,0.19401889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916404,0.0000018900026,0.00026272252,0.00048558268,0.0001826447,0.00039203657,0.0023871125,0.000023479208,0.0046241214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845677,0.00057575456,0.00044745693,0.0012444829,0.012236112,0.00092850154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98500854,0.004870978,0.00029958744,0.001858583,0.006645165,0.0013171707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012219537,0.00018954101,0.00031195226,0.019249154,0.0005771183,0.13855551,0.024990335,0.00015916816,0.29639584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19370958,0.00011600632,0.00006882314,0.12118131,0.00007015164,0.023646222,0.009001048,0.0005109327,0.004079794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005699022,0.000100019,0.017281245,0.00000915745,0.00000976488,0.00003053942,0.0018272683,0.000010624597,0.000011759685,0.00019203138,0.83471715,0.14575343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011230631,0.0012994447,0.2535589,0.00029445518,0.00000271238,0.000015436206,0.01143216,0.004116727,0.0017363483,0.0042975685,0.7214009,0.0007222539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086051034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015892729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29231605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007717409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053299207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193695151","doi":"10.7554/elife.11326","title":"What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Epidemiology; Global health; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Health care; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.6205947355845655,"score_gpt":0.6640031884035017,"score_spread":0.04340845281893624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193695151","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004961827,0.06702586,0.00008872092,0.008247822,0.91767615,0.00044350393,0.00042963668,0.000041082083,0.0010854224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037884742,0.09050866,0.0018894599,0.005499772,0.89387804,0.00006411888,0.0003629085,0.00006601497,0.0039425474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747335,0.0027611842,0.0022082822,0.0021167253,0.016516224,0.0016641244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630409,0.02528448,0.0010456255,0.0018624669,0.0061246846,0.0026418604],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12174086,0.0004127458,0.0016323588,0.02684876,0.00019167883,0.0028386998,0.0031790175,0.0013112098,0.00020371731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3350042,0.00029428984,0.00014850094,0.07862176,0.0003908525,0.0018444546,0.0013553607,0.0012521102,0.0004752031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036574213,0.00007179541,0.010969107,0.000008623125,0.000007632061,0.000016727381,0.00007767689,0.00000776807,3.346343e-7,0.00016576164,0.8803121,0.108325906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060975633,0.0004238435,0.0132417735,0.000043457418,0.000002752489,0.000004118675,0.0005005568,0.00035769792,4.438866e-7,0.01119234,0.973338,0.00028524626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016444077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022852016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21326336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007612145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032657464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201280991","doi":"10.2310/8000.2011.110496","title":"An award and a legacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.8032558773760292,"score_gpt":0.5934932109726336,"score_spread":0.20976266640339558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201280991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953905,0.0062230523,0.0016010703,0.0026649914,0.008723735,0.00007926043,0.0000064314554,0.0000029057574,0.02679356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975929,0.00051370263,0.00033575916,0.00009171374,0.00048168696,4.0016093e-7,3.3492563e-7,0.0000066144516,0.0009768399],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588823,0.0001343978,0.0009049569,0.00021769862,0.0024543533,0.00040036513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993166,0.00022243605,0.000328811,0.0003532459,0.0030726332,0.0028568478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135787735,0.00009355877,0.00027889633,0.034093034,0.00016241976,0.00010310917,0.0013937281,0.00005748525,0.01317037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02035465,0.000056324156,0.00006409636,0.03896956,0.0002064203,0.0008774717,0.000026740925,0.00023337339,0.00003427956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027991598,0.000049614977,0.61238134,0.0000059740114,0.00003812412,0.00036124376,0.005045182,0.000002629106,0.0005726011,0.0029990517,0.278518,0.09999829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006914005,0.002125144,0.6374332,0.000030619587,0.00002623801,0.00009053712,0.0049015423,0.00028230864,0.0001340206,0.028366687,0.32571858,0.0001997335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011040135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09979855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047231086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073526456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99554545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201403049","doi":"","title":"Évaluation de l'incidence du financement public de la recherche universitaire québécoise dans le domaine de la biotechnologie","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30438977219610047,"score_gpt":0.44414039281234635,"score_spread":0.13975062061624588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201403049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35224664,0.0070756986,0.56728756,0.06853007,0.0001256765,0.00058170507,0.000048875823,0.00032186342,0.00378194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74953216,0.01509689,0.22809502,0.0013865972,0.00012181272,0.00009470863,0.000010347365,0.000042183594,0.005620296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843357,0.0064284066,0.0010902389,0.0013956712,0.004034956,0.002714986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366547,0.011273159,0.00059657445,0.0018474071,0.0014016039,0.001215798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08239946,0.0005688129,0.00063450134,0.022532057,0.00122411,0.0034376245,0.0045514614,0.0023882112,0.0001584563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080831885,0.00056700985,0.0004074954,0.0769656,0.0014331959,0.0016431421,0.0010756812,0.002417091,0.00006323481],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102466554,0.0013085266,0.0952798,0.000022568858,0.00004371907,0.0006498148,0.00090951525,0.0025716044,0.03385161,0.1484625,0.012765097,0.7040328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016859142,0.0011407585,0.30948502,0.00018151812,0.00007584379,0.00075490715,0.0030312564,0.32545292,0.044384863,0.26079187,0.05198166,0.0010334612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03830681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035531244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7029993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010434959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010039411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206192201","doi":"","title":"Altmetrics: present and future","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Scientometrics; Data science; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; World Wide Web; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5604869580800869,"score_gpt":0.5795037459923841,"score_spread":0.019016787912297217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206192201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62746394,0.0053028883,0.0045997864,0.04562125,0.0012845871,0.0007903989,0.000009222853,0.000082321625,0.3148456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550787,0.0010045712,0.0052294545,0.00064328674,0.00093275844,0.000027517985,0.0000010866179,0.000009746531,0.03707283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247634,0.00009086015,0.00035891644,0.0005140603,0.0061450875,0.00041471745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940914,0.0025121968,0.00007618875,0.0005748116,0.0022043702,0.000541056],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066023334,0.000091773436,0.00016574793,0.046442144,0.00014738357,0.0038784833,0.0011477612,0.000079388206,0.009724528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00548844,0.000050398805,0.00005690613,0.16725089,0.00009113984,0.0007734457,0.00065582804,0.00013718948,0.0028880239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.330245e-7,0.000027260681,0.033673976,8.1405636e-7,0.0000031839895,0.0000014294662,0.000021989972,5.222394e-7,0.00007411999,0.0022513722,0.2719993,0.6919452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016767379,0.000063385225,0.32897764,3.8702498e-7,9.2038573e-7,0.0000054665024,0.00048337167,0.004011733,0.00021710555,0.016822794,0.6491533,0.000096225005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024550816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002550124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022417711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004021482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212616545","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0139005","title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Authorship in Radiology Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medical journal; Categorization; Medicine; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Library science; Univariate; Meta-analysis; Impact factor; Computer science; Family medicine; Statistics; Pathology; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Multivariate statistics","score_opus":0.9232797035653724,"score_gpt":0.610283124809877,"score_spread":0.31299657875549536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212616545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943604,0.0021846364,0.00038144967,0.00070323807,0.00005029391,0.00010215735,0.00001842112,0.0000053318117,0.0021941077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997625,0.0001674197,0.0016236561,0.000069331574,0.000024976373,0.000003651631,0.0000022415445,0.0000034604489,0.00048025989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907665,0.0006487393,0.0007932728,0.00036458226,0.0070646913,0.0003621814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898177,0.004382423,0.00029377174,0.00051623565,0.0045558475,0.00043403124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020390214,0.000076236276,0.0007186024,0.13369334,0.00003021507,0.00029178173,0.0013283716,0.000108912674,0.0005154668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05405388,0.000054132837,0.00013755998,0.33888322,0.00013048129,0.00020548025,0.00030116155,0.00024662432,0.00011321284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639382,0.00088999124,0.9857949,0.000003871991,0.00048709626,0.000019301142,0.0005155759,0.00034858813,0.005421778,0.00022816277,0.0010742544,0.005170062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005693833,0.00023048329,0.9527949,0.000014044908,0.00014382819,0.0000017469519,0.0005566769,0.031088512,0.0022514418,0.011844091,0.00039308518,0.00011177279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117127696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004228628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20518988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007868741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014398563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9539142},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2225957876","doi":"","title":"Bibliography of the members of the Royal Society of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3622542954131648,"score_gpt":0.4824579846372291,"score_spread":0.12020368922406433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225957876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020871672,0.0009206465,0.00004073168,0.0007119816,0.0012579125,0.00035019362,0.0004251429,0.000002340237,0.99420387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0575724,0.001889819,0.00015001408,0.00012749629,0.000053742933,0.0000026418186,0.0000013657456,0.000014446482,0.94018805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97960615,0.00014261666,0.0010107089,0.0004655076,0.01839077,0.0003842698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864824,0.0036629804,0.0019681612,0.002869983,0.004853343,0.00016317856],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012101802,0.00019259751,0.000631061,0.143961,0.0002987803,0.00030894703,0.01096464,0.00025880782,0.0013791232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060341056,0.000077789,0.0013455312,0.4140042,0.0012970127,0.00009010428,0.0023853127,0.0004415556,0.0000017379047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028831716,0.000019765952,0.024044307,0.000026144675,0.00006765898,1.6357852e-7,0.000013906954,0.000038450828,0.000014832618,0.00034425154,0.9741793,0.0012482845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002794381,0.000053152533,0.10968195,0.00008802623,0.000035801935,6.710055e-7,0.00016823212,0.0011083102,0.0022972862,0.0074908864,0.8785966,0.00019967277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24952272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10192887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27004322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044981556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004138198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226524777","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x","title":"How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Production (economics); Relation (database); Impact factor; Statistical analysis; Business; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7558819682205911,"score_gpt":0.6277056305859157,"score_spread":0.1281763376346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226524777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97538346,0.0002480292,0.020243814,0.001788594,0.0009827956,0.00041431043,0.00033213166,0.000027903794,0.0005789458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891614,0.000017919803,0.0023091617,0.000027378368,0.00005451293,0.0000104403225,0.0000021506107,0.000014889618,0.008402177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96931726,0.0005634705,0.00087940705,0.0020031785,0.02569866,0.001538015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96522546,0.01815615,0.00035888527,0.0017940674,0.012726195,0.0017392618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09974855,0.00020882227,0.0006025062,0.4767476,0.0009271588,0.0074615646,0.0025741048,0.00012406956,0.00034432148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3991574,0.000117539435,0.00016430025,0.7982325,0.0018128299,0.0011355258,0.001701463,0.00026152498,0.000098767356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016677262,0.00010814637,0.9263775,0.000008778137,0.000083605184,0.0000029118844,0.0007880807,0.000027860131,0.019895807,0.0045163003,0.0046243216,0.043550026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024930958,0.0002517567,0.9469564,0.000026717704,0.000057071327,0.0000018969605,0.0022264076,0.0006100925,0.009076896,0.0023162907,0.0379461,0.00028109134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012039453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009319081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3214849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043435112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036772818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935688},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2226862351","doi":"10.5860/crl-254","title":"A Review of Citation Analysis Methodologies for Collection Management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Citation analysis; Data science; Management science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.9446759520364565,"score_gpt":0.7177435534688097,"score_spread":0.2269323985676468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226862351","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.940995e-7,0.9743151,0.011771758,0.00030628286,0.00041230652,0.0046430547,0.0007961579,0.000034139714,0.0077207196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000028746392,0.95409495,0.0301729,0.000041060805,0.0001198999,0.0016150251,0.00020442391,0.000037173904,0.013711668],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762591,0.0065715592,0.002578715,0.0013112841,0.011985721,0.0012935974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908454,0.078893885,0.001328546,0.00212462,0.008689239,0.00050968654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13390796,0.00041551134,0.0036130564,0.18474689,0.0007216809,0.0017600144,0.0048458218,0.0004216379,0.00088276836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11606626,0.00027068213,0.0020622485,0.5470757,0.0007684942,0.0014231564,0.0024054681,0.00068571226,0.00012380234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024896564,0.00008027699,0.000018689476,0.052307725,0.0009324342,0.000002889493,0.000029486886,3.965756e-7,1.2880315e-7,0.016704349,0.16727565,0.7626231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013791474,0.00018634657,0.00008998087,0.0063421093,0.0014704249,0.0000021830344,0.00032875896,0.00005826942,0.000004633888,0.013347416,0.9777827,0.00024921162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023604174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006986737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8105071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033521815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014075127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W222776613","doi":"","title":"Early Findings from Humanities-Indicators Project Are Unveiled at Montreal Meeting.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œchronicle of higher education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Digital humanities; Higher education; Humanities; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.22617071649039294,"score_gpt":0.48442479041215225,"score_spread":0.2582540739217593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W222776613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790748,0.0025982093,0.000037960777,0.00036470653,0.0012411565,0.0003698385,0.00003201294,0.000028256165,0.01625308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976059,0.000033806882,0.00014241754,0.00015171367,0.00032693977,0.000019152445,0.0000135784985,0.000018609871,0.02323479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993358,0.00018543613,0.0007651327,0.0006049259,0.004507956,0.00057854695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946142,0.002713609,0.00058198423,0.0008946318,0.0010281523,0.00016743522],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007849961,0.00017036687,0.00027362735,0.014779586,0.00044303152,0.0006455034,0.0018791764,0.00013215718,0.0012073333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009218883,0.000111922374,0.00015504526,0.044408888,0.00027385863,0.0003605652,0.0004072982,0.00022556468,0.00033018694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011833504,0.0006163653,0.7764145,0.000011292901,0.0000541752,0.0000037461436,0.0024701604,0.0000071419313,0.0023624673,0.00079898495,0.15989865,0.05724416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033193966,0.00009673318,0.89946306,0.000015906917,0.000012220948,9.827843e-7,0.0009634737,0.00004295824,0.0019143672,0.0015996369,0.09542519,0.00013351947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013511108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12304855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005985866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054377416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227822771","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12123","title":"Citation‐Capture Rates for Economics Journals: Do they Differ from Other Disciplines and Does it Matter?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Proxy (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; CITES; Multidisciplinary approach; Social Sciences Citation Index; Citation impact; Hard and soft science; Impact factor; Social science; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Science Citation Index; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.24200280402426164,"score_gpt":0.4826729206852766,"score_spread":0.24067011666101498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227822771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97684497,0.001030702,0.00008800987,0.011049216,0.0005768843,0.00020904299,0.00044776255,0.0000029425257,0.00975049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901486,0.00519584,0.0014360792,0.0014088838,0.0012748557,0.000010086928,0.0000039377665,0.000032673823,0.00048903644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974336,0.00005349975,0.0013464567,0.0004938145,0.00025349285,0.00041915773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948926,0.0025371758,0.0011945483,0.0003284754,0.00030009227,0.00074708625],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007243627,0.0002558866,0.0007160072,0.007868827,0.00019508948,0.0031514198,0.0009048283,0.0001576562,0.00021778009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008630719,0.00016656841,0.00018758758,0.0010395147,0.00017092339,0.0006381006,0.0002842383,0.00020955117,0.000056786124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031060388,0.00038264753,0.26292276,0.000045834928,0.00179166,0.000005590384,0.02656505,0.032407284,0.0012331803,0.15873942,0.05933571,0.4534648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004304221,0.00019436333,0.045361273,0.000020850395,0.000052202897,0.000045765333,0.00988136,0.006291549,0.00027105366,0.7440995,0.18886447,0.00061341666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013336408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023058878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58536005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024714638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042231582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228153971","doi":"","title":"Le Choix de Filière d'Études au Québec : Résumé et Recommandations","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"CIRANO Project Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3841396892329702,"score_gpt":0.5390525446781685,"score_spread":0.15491285544519834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228153971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4963885,0.0072766705,0.0014174321,0.03657427,0.0024391564,0.0012346797,0.00010900769,0.00013439816,0.4544259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.750408,0.0021745826,0.0024001962,0.00069377315,0.0003352302,0.0000955272,0.000032038177,0.000044616347,0.24381606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893937,0.00081755954,0.0016732643,0.0015033437,0.005096939,0.0015152043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926548,0.0027011684,0.00050555594,0.0017548179,0.0017014208,0.00068222603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023895696,0.00036841884,0.000596214,0.021974241,0.0011276153,0.0032160673,0.001486165,0.0003886952,0.009505553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018132243,0.00032931907,0.00044060824,0.09641788,0.0005449192,0.001528497,0.00043701788,0.00075036794,0.0007943842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029907296,0.000752887,0.11675632,0.000043637105,0.00006223588,0.00078632834,0.0020041012,0.00025206455,0.00013190029,0.0014215129,0.103034995,0.7747241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003325731,0.00018083931,0.05468427,0.000079250065,0.000025587873,0.00091382116,0.00043349608,0.0011010036,0.0003781289,0.0019636464,0.9395062,0.00040122867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38401386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11395364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83647114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009854252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03207134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229757788","doi":"","title":"Un épisode de la guerre de la science au Royaume-Uni","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; University of Toronto; Western Kentucky University; Harvard University; University of Pennsylvania; York University; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.22294312304206107,"score_gpt":0.5035896545980231,"score_spread":0.280646531555962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229757788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77058446,0.0010060864,0.00015437059,0.0046721636,0.00056136254,0.0007604587,0.00090727105,0.000018048782,0.22133578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739992,0.012768054,0.00843505,0.0006674075,0.00083774264,0.000015578158,0.0000105597255,0.00008150488,0.0031849234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96994865,0.0011102501,0.004483157,0.0048255664,0.0062836427,0.01334871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93961924,0.02534915,0.0011080543,0.0025346999,0.006780042,0.024608804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1954222,0.001160512,0.002390302,0.044165444,0.0032935275,0.008701535,0.011273814,0.0014172291,0.0013407962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09961168,0.0010417309,0.00062638015,0.02563371,0.13167691,0.004077185,0.008259122,0.004243898,0.00021956781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014632563,0.00044752655,0.040619224,0.000084655156,0.000038663242,0.00003377957,0.00006091753,0.00015722612,0.0012305169,0.92690074,0.000044596556,0.030235827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021021871,0.0016148003,0.18938783,0.0003242052,0.000077897945,0.00043291156,0.0011680739,0.05299856,0.0069244485,0.7053556,0.03805913,0.0015543884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016441876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005209812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22154516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008160384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050106067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232401467","doi":"10.1002/asi.23759","title":"The scaling relationship between citation‐based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Exponent; Disadvantage; Bibliometrics; Natural science; Scaling law","score_opus":0.3228976914077188,"score_gpt":0.49624058819332095,"score_spread":0.17334289678560216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232401467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711369,0.000056915636,0.0014688838,0.026686983,0.00033170625,0.00014964993,0.0000070034935,0.000005006031,0.00015694859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995004,0.000041960164,0.00026005457,0.00007850244,0.00001947436,0.0000041146022,1.2027498e-7,0.0000011245781,0.00009422866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486125,0.00008798082,0.00075201504,0.00012102073,0.003883707,0.00029405876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835549,0.010328487,0.0012997228,0.00016582606,0.0045862263,0.00006485675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056599233,0.000057167377,0.00012644265,0.016406208,0.0012784088,0.0012684085,0.0014053691,0.00008635983,8.1258344e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16115066,0.000023651253,0.000036131252,0.047851123,0.0006522858,0.0034991703,0.00019918423,0.00020363615,0.0000033352585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044275453,0.0000022457257,0.92136,0.0000015227579,0.0000012975049,1.5761346e-8,0.00007493695,0.000011294041,0.000043829823,0.0065035177,0.00013545362,0.07186147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042668034,0.000072280054,0.9753832,0.000023350625,0.000002861201,0.0000025026363,0.0005319506,0.0028882565,0.00062680856,0.016967606,0.003030484,0.000044012435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021651692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065443446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10455143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027959526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040150087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234661914","doi":"10.1257/app.20140135","title":"Understanding the Changing Structure of Scientific Inquiry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Iron Curtain; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Population; Economic geography; Positive economics; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Demography; Cold war; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6496941265357059,"score_gpt":0.48809494942427006,"score_spread":0.16159917711143584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234661914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98445857,0.00009344409,0.008407769,0.0007195891,0.0021371958,0.00014057549,0.00003410409,0.0000080295085,0.004000702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983923,0.00008982999,0.0007557551,0.00017788743,0.0004112978,0.0000015332647,0.000002121306,0.000017898152,0.00015139795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666244,0.00009868534,0.0010646561,0.0005220216,0.00096576824,0.0006864042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995585,0.0013859883,0.0014208893,0.0007325907,0.00034143156,0.0005340877],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015969835,0.00017273118,0.0004920964,0.018011432,0.0005615375,0.003195902,0.002644411,0.000053059597,0.00020275889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011438725,0.00011457501,0.00016540108,0.017363856,0.0014683224,0.00051759614,0.0006178065,0.00039962807,0.00018351717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038785764,0.00016337937,0.09794053,0.000008332772,0.00046740007,0.000008266071,0.022102248,0.16757174,0.001521509,0.2108894,0.06422576,0.43471357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020827248,0.00039688527,0.010650519,0.000009380751,0.000040044884,0.0003189758,0.21194386,0.035251673,0.0030556512,0.683822,0.051531542,0.00089676585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026388685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046533656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47293258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011610895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006756194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242723686","doi":"10.1080/17521742.2010.573656","title":"Canadian Researcher Survey 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Editors Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Survey research; Geography; Psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.46786058892066307,"score_gpt":0.5400147138186191,"score_spread":0.07215412489795603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242723686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7273182,0.00016293538,0.0001648073,0.0600024,0.14659105,0.00050210085,0.00042457657,0.00007456071,0.064759366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90611833,0.000019080559,0.00077897473,0.0003663272,0.01671494,0.000015231976,0.000025058464,0.000027589349,0.07593448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878172,0.0005032979,0.00048741023,0.0007576138,0.009311074,0.0011233729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828316,0.008951155,0.00010821236,0.0013230327,0.004684629,0.0021013862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06450112,0.00014499247,0.0002232782,0.03829071,0.00043037697,0.0026980168,0.0035563617,0.00029813836,0.04049075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19250333,0.00010422231,0.0001025564,0.08105235,0.0002449801,0.0001435478,0.0004766767,0.0012302911,0.020877387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052134496,0.000023399862,0.14945082,3.8446342e-7,0.0000026737841,0.000012925943,0.000016942544,5.8780114e-7,0.00022836529,0.000049069255,0.8421135,0.008096144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008795403,0.000024742018,0.371414,6.163947e-7,3.685987e-7,0.0000015617096,0.000021840979,0.000051602314,0.0001272928,0.00036508063,0.62781394,0.00009103528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4460375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3699158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22196318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013088352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010343331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243431799","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12455","title":"CITATIONS OR JOURNAL QUALITY: WHICH IS REWARDED MORE IN THE ACADEMIC LABOR MARKET?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Economics; POLK; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law","score_opus":0.8029192847958765,"score_gpt":0.6650213172577557,"score_spread":0.13789796753812078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243431799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407729,0.00027406326,0.0001267079,0.04401851,0.0030908808,0.00020395304,0.000059438236,0.000007089609,0.011446471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870298,0.0007636204,0.00028010766,0.0019742125,0.001096433,0.000016868273,0.0000013329011,0.000010824022,0.00882682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949058,0.00052731927,0.0010981357,0.0005515835,0.0023511935,0.0005659673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906496,0.005917204,0.00076403737,0.0015730449,0.00086168223,0.00023444841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056551963,0.00013527842,0.00031252156,0.015767325,0.0010911452,0.0057072593,0.006248323,0.000181939,0.003385295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061865516,0.000076395394,0.000121118464,0.015527408,0.00037361443,0.0014261241,0.00059666915,0.0008588307,0.0010459202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007854136,0.000052620417,0.22216113,0.0000035159421,0.000020360756,0.000020643063,0.006122168,0.00002938228,0.000027435308,0.0012585788,0.73226136,0.037964292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006191237,0.000045900342,0.87100655,0.00000972656,0.0000033773124,0.00003055389,0.007952284,0.0018051286,0.000031700634,0.014763307,0.1035813,0.00015103152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012335982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020739507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64884543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021384175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071166875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247316336","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1172","title":"Peer Review in Canada: Results from a Promising Experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Negotiation; Skepticism; Peer review; Political science; Criminal justice; Quality assurance; Legal profession; Public relations; Competence (human resources); Economic Justice; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Engineering; Service (business)","score_opus":0.6286206581155899,"score_gpt":0.5296321945891875,"score_spread":0.09898846352640234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247316336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23888052,0.10990317,0.0005570377,0.047450747,0.0024331873,0.00079607236,0.0002891375,0.000023728528,0.5996664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866314,0.008732652,0.0016112945,0.0007428806,0.00015050803,0.000003135659,0.0000070626215,0.000010700135,0.0021104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97978187,0.00040928353,0.0014218668,0.0005727489,0.017144812,0.00066941744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921166,0.0019060319,0.00046688522,0.00065119786,0.0041699233,0.00068940787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02141712,0.000164636,0.00046218847,0.006670223,0.0005049568,0.0008863117,0.0018897417,0.00005981767,0.00067798194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032702453,0.00011025802,0.00013476954,0.040922012,0.0000826448,0.00057077856,0.00033062664,0.0006546593,0.00011044868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023357946,0.00045529864,0.030603472,0.000024523953,0.000061571525,0.0065845083,0.0013743553,0.0002199295,0.0008418804,0.0044947937,0.8519914,0.103114665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010924858,0.0004820974,0.21206163,0.0035083855,0.000033973425,0.0035060209,0.0029418268,0.0046433476,0.007227295,0.05926606,0.69350135,0.0019031585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95406073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95243543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010376042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020805437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97946364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252830763","doi":"10.7202/1028834ar","title":"Cinquante ans de recherche à l’EBSI : portrait scientométrique de la dynamique de recherche au sein du corps professoral","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.7636546267932617,"score_gpt":0.6402117135931462,"score_spread":0.12344291320011547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252830763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55617833,0.009503904,0.32922974,0.028530871,0.0016697672,0.0012822235,0.00020988632,0.00022413586,0.073171146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253714,0.034252606,0.1480795,0.0041742646,0.00063099334,0.00024740407,0.00009572782,0.000136271,0.0870118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94573087,0.04046868,0.0018158103,0.0017269428,0.007460112,0.0027975899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630915,0.027764782,0.0008551008,0.0010162301,0.004826583,0.0024458107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3086128,0.0005843068,0.00070172496,0.095927455,0.00049460615,0.023671344,0.003017187,0.002008008,0.0034465399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13004892,0.0005390311,0.0003556548,0.2961834,0.0012092306,0.011849478,0.00078176154,0.0032597259,0.00040970594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006942278,0.0023367053,0.48015478,0.0002736594,0.00022337446,0.0006981279,0.04096504,0.0013705809,0.017110612,0.111751266,0.17464907,0.16977254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005232206,0.0022148257,0.094984256,0.00058023434,0.00014490112,0.0008044112,0.026106615,0.080942154,0.026328834,0.6050263,0.15577216,0.0018631055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01585265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016444761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49327502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012440009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023180591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255587629","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00419","title":"Ideational Influence, Connectedness, and Venue Representation: Making an Assessment of Scholarly Capital","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Publication; Promotion (chess); Representation (politics); Work (physics); Capital (architecture); Sociology; Test (biology); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.2710711994470204,"score_gpt":0.5434944868765219,"score_spread":0.2724232874295015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255587629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98675585,0.00007341804,0.009772609,0.00087392423,0.0011963787,0.00029858132,0.00012907328,0.000003845236,0.00089635106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922854,0.000017201563,0.0003294182,0.000040270414,0.00010140629,0.0000064489273,0.0000019270544,0.000002594536,0.00027221156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992902,0.00028035432,0.0013342397,0.00008517734,0.005257847,0.00014037952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805457,0.0028849423,0.003873858,0.00021466454,0.012399225,0.000081585014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019749945,0.000060472234,0.00021967143,0.005619373,0.00019597275,0.0021191123,0.00071517355,0.00008658662,0.0000065755507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040750433,0.000031335985,0.0001101995,0.009275686,0.000030049101,0.0097823925,0.000098253724,0.00011148071,0.000005102971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025771446,0.000026646452,0.95964533,0.000014942891,0.000053665117,1.3503478e-7,0.00068238226,0.0009835754,0.0012895847,0.027433425,0.0023223588,0.007522164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009040143,0.00011416602,0.978161,0.000059660546,0.0000112968755,0.000013900368,0.0010353113,0.001782865,0.00014538266,0.0033066093,0.014409053,0.000056763998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010469334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017192386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024126817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037063373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030356186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262317165","doi":"","title":"Relationship among Internet Usage, Economic Growth, and Publication Productivity: Comparison between ASEAN and World's Best Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Business; Product (mathematics); Developing country; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.34655900150587543,"score_gpt":0.47608137694854996,"score_spread":0.12952237544267453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262317165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225837,0.00008015057,0.05838112,0.0013893814,0.00011777422,0.00033434076,0.000012337662,0.000033264165,0.017067952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773735,0.000007408997,0.00090764865,0.000052167856,0.000086881926,0.000022665632,0.0000041938442,0.000008596267,0.001173064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941882,0.000115351286,0.00057350536,0.0013307265,0.003256751,0.0005354595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465144,0.0031421147,0.00033336756,0.0006919938,0.00067737506,0.00050370104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022952205,0.00016264095,0.00031621597,0.020356063,0.0006892182,0.0062725986,0.0015830441,0.00006678452,0.000033838285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009431171,0.00013078649,0.00002500011,0.03152973,0.0021252735,0.0017825557,0.0009625232,0.00024610962,0.00012508949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051942693,0.000021374815,0.9356692,0.0000046587315,0.0000018742967,8.809643e-8,0.00027620982,0.000013134559,0.0004065188,0.017509574,0.00069577276,0.045396406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020400788,0.00004493783,0.8638071,0.000003923527,0.000005998932,0.0000011969654,0.000067503584,0.09644424,0.001746778,0.03442042,0.003065386,0.00018850423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012902264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017762379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09643111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001204151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016239144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264090703","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2337682","title":"Scientific Apophenia in Strategic Management Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic management; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.6158694660558478,"score_gpt":0.5836586941299354,"score_spread":0.032210771925912374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264090703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96249264,0.0036362864,0.0005991524,0.0017374455,0.00053573836,0.0004190059,0.00000133948,0.000012278932,0.030566122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96948624,0.0027230314,0.0002006513,0.000020214933,0.00010757853,0.00002594087,0.0000011963053,0.000013304627,0.027421854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773499,0.0008498452,0.00087518885,0.00085487554,0.013913221,0.0061569763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927059,0.001334844,0.00017869535,0.00085945317,0.004453956,0.00046719762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14545599,0.00015628083,0.00024954823,0.09227725,0.0008539836,0.011812725,0.00419944,0.00010358501,0.0009361963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033411754,0.00010653615,0.00014126004,0.21534128,0.00035227175,0.0012269344,0.0007028187,0.0036160403,0.0043860665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033510645,0.00044659822,0.024015391,0.00000759352,0.000043578417,0.00007247719,0.0001992642,0.00009986257,0.0011287169,0.65886223,0.007721075,0.3073697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005040629,0.00019450788,0.008315925,0.0000129363625,0.0000014359533,0.00007590313,0.010651049,0.0015247095,0.000046067304,0.97646815,0.002073202,0.00013205143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002035363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005606212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31760594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001749053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023010476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264429331","doi":"","title":"Qualitative Study on Dimensions of 'Centre of Excellence' of Foreign Subsidiaries: A Content Analysis of Scientific Literature by Nvivo (Étude Qualitative Sur les Dimensions du Concept de Centre de L’Excellence de la Filiale a L’Étranger: Une Analyse du Contenu de la Littérature Scientifique par Nvivo) (French)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Subsidiary; Multinational corporation; Content analysis; Qualitative research; Sociology; Sample (material); Management; Political science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.11319629354291572,"score_gpt":0.4411822315060243,"score_spread":0.3279859379631086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264429331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522766,0.03819296,0.004565328,0.0018220897,0.0003067693,0.0006743541,0.002005268,0.000010951907,0.00014569267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856889,0.01086387,0.000807723,0.000025303916,0.00005252371,0.000012380368,0.00004891443,0.000034693097,0.0024656383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737285,0.012936462,0.0026748634,0.001371526,0.005842816,0.0034458258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585362,0.025566306,0.002665527,0.0011299752,0.011143798,0.0009582085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08750893,0.00061253615,0.0018379914,0.0185512,0.0009835919,0.0009995789,0.0025595573,0.0007127599,0.00032729097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039405223,0.00045311305,0.0012781208,0.093012616,0.0065445593,0.0006111728,0.0003909507,0.00391545,0.000004092999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065963576,0.008363019,0.16251811,0.00014104653,0.004099362,0.00011588391,0.5510497,0.00088690483,0.228508,0.036435075,0.0043897675,0.0028334565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00414689,0.0020731608,0.019939993,0.0010548033,0.0020376146,0.000108995744,0.86873674,0.0067460146,0.053258695,0.04062145,0.0005324853,0.0007431734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073475987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074334536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.317687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093936577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007956789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264463174","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1846-0","title":"Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of South Africa","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Library science; Productivity; Medical education; Population; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.7350202013577418,"score_gpt":0.6208490315127927,"score_spread":0.11417116984494913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264463174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906318,0.00073485594,0.0006557208,0.0009051833,0.0007326345,0.00056053215,0.0000675769,0.000033469005,0.0056782207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639803,0.000086808315,0.00041810327,0.000027011158,0.000057018027,0.00003033521,0.0000016917224,0.000018713892,0.0029622575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657006,0.0011704097,0.00150628,0.0017150487,0.027746128,0.002161516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971301,0.016063169,0.00036653606,0.001599673,0.009592143,0.001077432],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11080867,0.0002549729,0.00051031256,0.49142045,0.0003508513,0.004645818,0.0043446654,0.0002920899,0.00040166415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3862859,0.00014706452,0.00011687501,0.8414483,0.0003983643,0.002547789,0.0014909299,0.0007956754,0.0009874034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021088566,0.00014015404,0.96061635,0.0000033644578,0.0000022060267,0.00001669694,0.0037783762,0.000046527886,0.0017449015,0.00061443076,0.0026039619,0.030411916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012986293,0.00023008013,0.9503058,0.0000624748,0.0000012514514,5.751936e-7,0.0120748775,0.0007106786,0.003132249,0.009093488,0.022717817,0.00037203188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013789732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024373917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35002786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019613714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012376616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979043},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2267067706","doi":"","title":"Economics Research in Canada: A Long-Run Assessment of Journal Publications","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Economics education; Political science; Applied economics; Library science; Economics; Positive economics; Higher education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5734863969931597,"score_gpt":0.5931875527133056,"score_spread":0.019701155720145858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267067706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84847206,0.0005867029,0.000069780406,0.0028284297,0.0012001845,0.0012540992,0.00020737248,0.000008054534,0.14537331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970301,0.025078904,0.0016732288,0.00005063262,0.00027278037,0.00013517101,0.000031713294,0.00005922482,0.0023973945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737255,0.0030427647,0.0049967733,0.0027057999,0.011855938,0.0036732072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96071655,0.024234505,0.0012074168,0.0036303198,0.0087120375,0.0014991742],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18956693,0.00041691554,0.0013752172,0.15173954,0.0004989375,0.0035773446,0.009970644,0.00071576453,0.0006787567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034856368,0.0003908458,0.00035184337,0.06274098,0.0009776871,0.00061951904,0.008063652,0.009096058,0.000020112837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050145274,0.00040714428,0.5533216,0.000050792343,0.000058232647,0.000100677666,0.00010041843,0.017342001,0.000013410785,0.0016669782,0.0014759247,0.42541268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010782175,0.00018914558,0.8689235,0.00017371576,0.0000035846847,0.000046442143,0.0029983576,0.063244075,0.000077339064,0.020725576,0.041970287,0.0005697853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2352342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.793982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5587478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020906191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058054224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268343888","doi":"10.17705/1cais.03813","title":"Practical Suggestions for Improving Scholarly Peer Review Quality and Reducing Cycle Times","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Transparency (behavior); Criticism; Harm; Scrutiny; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Technical peer review; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Resentment; Political science; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5942597451162388,"score_gpt":0.5926192196708046,"score_spread":0.0016405254454342488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268343888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007548487,0.010327647,0.18283005,0.73124415,0.0026600226,0.012374763,0.004608275,0.00017433507,0.048232257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523873,0.0008111039,0.0077547017,0.00023745334,0.00003110361,0.00033710856,0.00003858195,0.0000064371607,0.0055447575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405503,0.00056475605,0.0014465539,0.00015237292,0.0035658546,0.00021545861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94595295,0.02351979,0.0029358452,0.0027396122,0.024730733,0.00012106366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06105042,0.00007927154,0.00026761976,0.0026122015,0.0007232273,0.0014954491,0.0023228882,0.00010837251,0.000003848093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.464141,0.000044437376,0.00016301668,0.009721796,0.00008677519,0.0042176773,0.0008584531,0.00013084033,0.000029949138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030239898,0.00014146153,0.03778718,0.0006136181,0.000107691085,5.1482805e-9,0.0005741347,0.000039345046,0.00086138624,0.56574655,0.2906557,0.10344271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001063331,0.00006662511,0.047304016,0.00040504607,0.00006124106,0.0000029758494,0.0007743243,0.0067168465,0.00022702842,0.0056865304,0.937491,0.00020104315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008234876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056220256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031832198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024239838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272803201","doi":"","title":"Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Legitimacy; High tech; Narrative; Diversity (politics); Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.18298718709355893,"score_gpt":0.4570893013116872,"score_spread":0.27410211421812825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272803201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832492,0.0037654235,0.004613764,0.007375299,0.00038098145,0.00010780852,0.0000037774334,0.0000026337943,0.0005011157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952238,0.0041778707,0.00021207654,0.00017343409,0.00012741039,0.0000025970523,4.879245e-7,0.000003069516,0.00007923461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930541,0.0002497897,0.00049122935,0.0002739189,0.0049429517,0.0009880157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966674,0.0017042909,0.00023832553,0.00025496588,0.0010351652,0.00009989139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048996195,0.00008556671,0.00012910136,0.008160513,0.00082290126,0.0005545705,0.0027255071,0.00005945718,0.0001475235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01639726,0.00003828366,0.00005055703,0.06882213,0.0007591849,0.00040837287,0.00023977866,0.0012634768,0.00001425908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019786585,0.00011775362,0.20672686,0.0000019216543,0.000025851296,0.0000028360982,0.00040638892,0.00039379136,0.0018794008,0.7618473,0.0009879736,0.027590107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048229526,0.00024425678,0.30156532,0.00000647195,0.000008980988,0.00050755264,0.007696622,0.002713344,0.00015834888,0.6855683,0.00091267214,0.00013586083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016271598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010725511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094838455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046211364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038826687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99188805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272845791","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.96161.v2","title":"Scaling and Citations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8999824432285404,"score_gpt":0.6596011915158486,"score_spread":0.24038125171269176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272845791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41217983,0.024397304,0.00047625645,0.0028524466,0.0013256748,0.0010233206,0.30556944,0.00023291117,0.2519428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736637,0.00000589289,0.00040870754,0.00011128919,0.00010290423,0.000016368684,0.0010253266,0.000003864156,0.00095928315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.00004457481,0.00016336316,0.00017028674,0.0022635127,0.00030060104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994483,0.004056718,0.000056769528,0.0002320513,0.0008214238,0.00035001498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022389127,0.000044637934,0.00007135929,0.0120243095,0.00015250084,0.0009830939,0.00045231942,0.000039170045,0.14053252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117054276,0.000030887102,0.000031692278,0.0534229,0.0000080629425,0.00058615766,0.00032570265,0.000079917074,0.0071906038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2135447e-7,0.00002446097,0.022688787,0.000004017752,0.0000022317176,9.0942024e-7,0.00014238416,0.0000022108104,0.00004368964,0.00022331433,0.8291237,0.14774361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078579236,0.00001031149,0.39705008,0.0000231125,7.317646e-7,0.000004638491,0.00016878571,0.0009440754,0.000191546,0.0008536976,0.60059553,0.00007890464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023075374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.230617e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58518654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013883438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026137814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277327339","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2017.1284997","title":"Researcher rank stability across alternative output measurement schemes in the context of a time limited research evaluation: the New Zealand case","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Stability (learning theory); Productivity; Econometrics; Term (time); Economics; Computer science; Operations research; Management science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Geography; Machine learning; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8450552716959101,"score_gpt":0.6038854642037887,"score_spread":0.24116980749212136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277327339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983222,0.000221309,0.000064395994,0.0077394396,0.000108786226,0.0015390405,0.00006143795,0.000003720508,0.0070398417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893546,0.00013566628,0.000066322566,0.00009055163,0.000113320944,0.00010465226,0.0000027848002,0.000010254328,0.0005409694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878032,0.0012758164,0.0010184512,0.0009002617,0.0081013,0.00090097036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98217815,0.009537941,0.00049737707,0.0030413186,0.0044984347,0.00024678287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2319394,0.00014949666,0.0003611994,0.0042822068,0.0011063823,0.0036266993,0.00531158,0.00011455656,0.0003736487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04744088,0.00008167768,0.00011503057,0.0115639875,0.0010998504,0.00039851613,0.0014567424,0.00068347476,0.00027808655],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009838648,0.0006396426,0.04650646,0.000013045608,0.00016619047,0.00004055891,0.02542328,0.0006433877,0.0006311914,0.0059568067,0.058388725,0.86060685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01940991,0.0007932092,0.3539894,0.000048355338,0.00004422962,0.00009873346,0.083831154,0.14134987,0.022149688,0.21643956,0.16078557,0.0010603375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003599622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004221598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8595465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049900514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091114617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280374399","doi":"10.1007/s11192-015-1807-z","title":"Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Index (typography); Computer science; Metric (unit); Citation; Position (finance); Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Data science; Citation index; Operations research; Library science; Mathematics; Marketing; Economics; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9550993674466709,"score_gpt":0.6719727838580462,"score_spread":0.28312658358862475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280374399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93958366,0.0059018144,0.03765344,0.0044144955,0.00556417,0.0008520088,0.000036454327,0.00004433195,0.0059496197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840502,0.00004293285,0.0017659124,0.000121371544,0.0001921975,0.0000040957343,0.0000018045247,0.000020955296,0.013800516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9508038,0.00093480933,0.0013106144,0.0012979019,0.04405071,0.0016021507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568042,0.014736644,0.0011390125,0.004768381,0.020087076,0.0024646942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18200314,0.0002549535,0.00044676568,0.1317207,0.0014463781,0.010658663,0.011210214,0.00016100133,0.00016577695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26241818,0.0001202309,0.0003309421,0.6987687,0.0024168538,0.0011238639,0.003133236,0.00075011933,0.00033170832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008076246,0.00029619117,0.48426223,0.0000134709035,0.00005384137,0.000016138049,0.005734059,0.006513942,0.0014244035,0.0037505077,0.23635527,0.2614992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020091427,0.00040706675,0.14527929,0.000038149985,0.000041234358,0.000045456247,0.020975498,0.2806717,0.003899914,0.017665206,0.5282596,0.0007078125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009794218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009258748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.567048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043948097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033158995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281991771","doi":"","title":"Big publishers, bigger profits : how the scholarly community lost the control of its journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Business; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.251894463625915,"score_gpt":0.3460360942199667,"score_spread":0.09414163059405167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281991771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8628324,0.02558943,0.003081166,0.08466194,0.0007700542,0.000699721,0.00012600549,0.000041424886,0.022197807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923295,0.0002328258,0.000055212873,0.0010150322,0.00015413864,0.0000056566446,0.0000025031081,0.000008454641,0.006196698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908203,0.0013866865,0.00049652194,0.00038933335,0.006437388,0.00046977005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999566,0.0034633877,0.00058823486,0.0008628328,0.004509332,0.00058053934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01103696,0.00019279674,0.00032889258,0.0043874513,0.008678796,0.0039340225,0.0044969385,0.00015538938,0.00011278899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020689785,0.00010739286,0.00031377666,0.037349273,0.00065148284,0.0026036561,0.0011798233,0.0011921801,0.00009782208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014979419,0.0008546575,0.54797685,0.000076260745,0.00094824063,0.00083058083,0.04491129,0.0026796488,0.104047425,0.024243629,0.12135727,0.15057622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026818058,0.0004421877,0.51439625,0.000051725,0.00011724207,0.00032098466,0.06455786,0.0096300915,0.011439034,0.0012590513,0.3946538,0.00044996288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002083928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002656648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27329654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007516983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001343888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283711217","doi":"","title":"Manuscript processing times are negatively correlated with journal impact factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26387220803808714,"score_gpt":0.4572115790032622,"score_spread":0.19333937096517506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283711217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825653,0.00014570531,0.00905348,0.0011143631,0.0005505922,0.00014636073,0.000013169043,0.000004428508,0.006406593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983386,0.000010287582,0.0010966116,0.00022382327,0.00003662089,6.63246e-7,5.2943483e-7,0.000003883764,0.00028902674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080753,0.00007438971,0.0011184132,0.00014801751,0.00710072,0.0007509144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97278047,0.00040670013,0.0019801925,0.00024026676,0.021793151,0.0027992076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300758,0.0001500017,0.00027296215,0.06397084,0.001177063,0.01659324,0.0028862974,0.00006541997,0.0019620021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024873935,0.00007779865,0.00011054769,0.099300295,0.0007870382,0.026881967,0.000060871356,0.00056236534,0.00034009066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025508423,0.000022621396,0.7247073,0.0000068186014,0.00002598755,0.000053758897,0.007045517,0.0034350085,0.0002148435,0.00015348147,0.08680156,0.1775076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042402846,0.00035018317,0.9713615,0.000064396234,0.0000045870015,0.0008461272,0.009036193,0.009386249,0.0003456268,0.0009446609,0.007052707,0.00018369422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013301416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024384438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24665424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000709178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010079871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284129047","doi":"10.7202/1029323ar","title":"La gestion des connaissances dans les organisations québécoises : état des lieux, enjeux actuels, avenir","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.48192912784833386,"score_gpt":0.5252783895354713,"score_spread":0.043349261687137486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284129047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7152398,0.12130693,0.087046064,0.014885405,0.002021633,0.0008729985,0.00033357838,0.00029954503,0.05799405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981974,0.07256505,0.008799819,0.00029313887,0.00021170994,0.00006226553,0.00006441429,0.000054193835,0.01975201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883247,0.002301225,0.0012183784,0.0010613697,0.0061067124,0.0009876423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850836,0.0063219527,0.000580016,0.0006824647,0.0061982134,0.0011337794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015700359,0.00048655146,0.0005180124,0.067655586,0.0010286479,0.02924202,0.0016991622,0.00042933656,0.0077978494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031382225,0.00042316428,0.00022772659,0.18092956,0.003155743,0.019266644,0.0005353352,0.000584473,0.00079800165],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091809314,0.0007539826,0.2067499,0.00013871465,0.00009684543,0.000056762237,0.025499906,0.0006397599,0.0028798427,0.031957746,0.07148641,0.6596483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018167057,0.0009423952,0.2705865,0.00037827523,0.000115390954,0.00014019721,0.03455082,0.001322421,0.012125807,0.1890221,0.4880823,0.0009171205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067996713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6587312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013901091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002422663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285529589","doi":"10.18352/lq.10139","title":"A Library-publisher Partnership for Open Access: Building an Innovative Relationship between Scholarly Publishers and Academic Libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Publishing; Open access publishing; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Business; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.6954928810346864,"score_gpt":0.5685022125474674,"score_spread":0.12699066848721907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285529589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87621796,0.000719224,0.0013467683,0.106584854,0.0004225268,0.00096205325,0.00007853924,0.000028031018,0.013640059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832131,0.000042366017,0.0013080171,0.00038964083,0.00051765086,0.000008926306,0.0000034310563,0.00004795583,0.014468911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777664,0.010968807,0.0019440517,0.0004850226,0.008010365,0.0008253586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88899714,0.09488098,0.0040656305,0.0014557602,0.009941536,0.0006589665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10332833,0.00020121732,0.00049077126,0.011722816,0.001139172,0.05936775,0.01783936,0.00019295292,0.000105402985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17657387,0.00008992235,0.00016701253,0.054947022,0.0007659544,0.116498195,0.004100544,0.0015936228,0.000011187614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019480685,0.000038252463,0.72591084,0.000007210997,0.00007632655,7.4056817e-7,0.002375366,8.515e-7,0.00018754945,0.026289014,0.230864,0.014055068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008351358,0.0004814697,0.6956143,0.0000730038,0.000014894606,0.000002013351,0.0017907362,0.000007933916,0.00046973882,0.25467432,0.04592804,0.000108464534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010950376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000239711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2283853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012063165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011885293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287531290","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1848-y","title":"The effect of holding a research chair on scientists’ productivity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Novelty; Matching (statistics); Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7473508328001948,"score_gpt":0.6643655597955263,"score_spread":0.08298527300466851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287531290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797401,0.00072425534,0.00131532,0.0029660556,0.0027899889,0.00082038774,0.00004222076,0.000038465343,0.011563243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868195,0.00016913896,0.00010405413,0.000011840638,0.00016088429,0.000036835754,3.864746e-7,0.000017586159,0.012679789],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9428851,0.0024390898,0.0011031021,0.0019229711,0.04950253,0.0021472152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8820871,0.10123921,0.0005950801,0.0036537272,0.011456199,0.0009686986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31661305,0.00024386321,0.00047753885,0.19908656,0.0019412878,0.003301554,0.0073662833,0.0001413917,0.00011493149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.545146,0.00009615324,0.00028839827,0.6657676,0.0027678607,0.0008130836,0.0022205987,0.0005210298,0.00085968134],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108340595,0.00012657001,0.2115906,0.000010882653,0.000012860889,0.000005552972,0.00006717925,0.000009806328,0.011977594,0.0047006123,0.022298865,0.74909115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022315257,0.0054053804,0.4698769,0.00011264347,0.000009143299,0.000015197744,0.00017128202,0.00074682856,0.2789234,0.009931369,0.23206158,0.0005147954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002823019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000889988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74857634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005108209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003504165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287897107","doi":"","title":"Les journalistes scientifiques: des éducateurs? Enquête auprès des membres de l'Association des communicateurs scientifiques du Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les cahiers du journalisme","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2824002846757179,"score_gpt":0.4535857763753688,"score_spread":0.17118549169965086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287897107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8451297,0.11614526,0.011737493,0.014288252,0.0023675757,0.00040856207,0.00018422236,0.00013251146,0.009606395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88763547,0.03475723,0.014503813,0.00038408648,0.0011434717,0.000032171596,0.000022450155,0.000116814306,0.061404496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778987,0.004956835,0.002666385,0.0014596538,0.009333805,0.0036845845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97223824,0.009498228,0.0022946037,0.0014343987,0.012552703,0.0019818328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07144963,0.00086046685,0.0011390032,0.032229993,0.01090015,0.024716847,0.006903002,0.0009432783,0.0025125276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050197914,0.0007342371,0.0010781602,0.07595816,0.013515957,0.004543726,0.0012025791,0.0025204893,0.00032183577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007496369,0.0010247412,0.7386077,0.00022331356,0.00021399498,0.00022600715,0.010596041,0.0005057171,0.0049693445,0.010588415,0.08174536,0.15122442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017495729,0.00038821172,0.32071736,0.001385605,0.00032187387,0.0012346258,0.010983467,0.0033704408,0.013485794,0.1951346,0.44968978,0.00153866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22334383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08014334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41789034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012429036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033522418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292160947","doi":"","title":"BioMed Central : un nouveau modèle de l'édition scientifique à l'Université de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0780410226523355,"score_gpt":0.29331870721050807,"score_spread":0.21527768455817256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292160947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787539,0.054687276,0.015585141,0.018687451,0.0026042385,0.00058674335,0.00049567496,0.0001439321,0.028455624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504706,0.003694605,0.0067637092,0.0003431689,0.0004820168,0.000010973775,0.000058506645,0.000031811305,0.1381446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894779,0.0006776323,0.00076726236,0.0014442225,0.005379263,0.002253725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346596,0.0009525634,0.0005028157,0.0009566578,0.0017643712,0.0023576447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004717171,0.00051934284,0.00052456267,0.014712114,0.012396796,0.0010065552,0.0023943703,0.00066494476,0.0012730645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015258606,0.0005636702,0.0006191028,0.033304848,0.0013580851,0.0019542584,0.0018209904,0.00069786946,0.00077805936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019300822,0.0034852016,0.16993293,0.00015715603,0.0007468827,0.01286574,0.038612142,0.055598404,0.12131263,0.066173255,0.12502913,0.40415645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027013859,0.00021212143,0.14058635,0.00011885351,0.00018423008,0.002429262,0.0072653745,0.12093925,0.040565755,0.0020755196,0.68202895,0.00089294504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056058966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010643184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5569998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034995645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004592357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292736936","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2015.7417042","title":"Crawling ResearchGate.net to Measure Student/Supervisor Collaboration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; Crawling; Supervisor; Download; Computer science; Social network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); World Wide Web; Measure (data warehouse); Knowledge management; Data science; Social media; Database; Management","score_opus":0.8281249177914913,"score_gpt":0.646497618326707,"score_spread":0.1816272994647843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292736936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56143606,0.007183191,0.06431351,0.11039587,0.0037477557,0.0043229945,0.0014920046,0.0004904867,0.24661814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895717,0.00038668347,0.0076536797,0.00051167357,0.00009804392,0.000118615186,0.000048216978,0.000017247494,0.0015941596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837805,0.0018084433,0.0012482422,0.0010128244,0.011122115,0.0010278573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96699095,0.0017274999,0.0003261551,0.005637336,0.023415925,0.0019021663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025488717,0.0003280505,0.0005565184,0.009205179,0.00081111625,0.0064754845,0.01380752,0.00023951188,0.0003373158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031553973,0.00027550966,0.00013824305,0.110299,0.0004285524,0.0014178067,0.0037368152,0.0005834753,0.005149337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018809056,0.0012539031,0.13340777,0.000009092262,0.00010186321,0.000014256516,0.0024328725,0.00062663376,0.0015520818,0.02522091,0.707171,0.12802148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041821348,0.0013817223,0.095734455,0.00014525556,0.000063321226,0.000041109957,0.03571169,0.052470826,0.0010444843,0.06327222,0.74401176,0.0019410131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035538923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42813563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095954345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025159926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292880094","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22459","title":"How do you write and present research well? 7—Cite to get cited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Balance (ability); Library science; Computer science; History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3411668512366858,"score_gpt":0.46269953616880805,"score_spread":0.12153268493212227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292880094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94327575,0.0013036695,0.001807913,0.052770842,0.00028188602,0.00013074093,0.000016090322,0.000004528477,0.00040855168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785566,0.00002684378,0.00039397733,0.00005950575,0.0003185681,0.0000021195297,1.03912704e-7,0.000011817523,0.0013314018],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945587,0.00008910612,0.0003530134,0.0002524001,0.0040056943,0.0007410892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916801,0.0033552274,0.000084420884,0.00042683378,0.0023363493,0.0021170748],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014989929,0.00010490317,0.00021899412,0.02224088,0.00014432115,0.0025375972,0.0018835647,0.00008603888,0.00011301539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033909027,0.000050112638,0.00008327489,0.035056755,0.00018556166,0.00034456633,0.00022939415,0.0004843764,0.000035757937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008766461,0.000034478668,0.019064372,0.00002483878,0.00011716288,0.0004126269,0.00094938814,0.0008274404,0.49432808,0.0042137653,0.14659396,0.33334622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010697623,0.0002798832,0.010858374,0.00020572067,0.000011233697,0.00033049847,0.00019848876,0.0050771544,0.09307391,0.005680429,0.88278115,0.0004333802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032385503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006567277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7361872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027458824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003787157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293584438","doi":"","title":"Founding concepts and foundational work: Establishing the framework for the use of acknowledgments as indicators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Multidisciplinary approach; Credibility; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Publication; Value (mathematics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8371206012614246,"score_gpt":0.631173726372103,"score_spread":0.20594687488932162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293584438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8564377,0.002274846,0.12977782,0.0050205803,0.003351781,0.0008632735,0.000034504585,0.000017607292,0.002221886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110526,0.00005342187,0.0066130655,0.00025439894,0.00020015985,0.00002233905,0.0000018990055,0.0000074083423,0.0017420446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950644,0.00014247472,0.00035706858,0.00029677415,0.0038482933,0.00029098382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564698,0.04074785,0.00030497246,0.0005501054,0.0016643811,0.00026289222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013624243,0.000080651116,0.00014333555,0.0063504707,0.0004084739,0.0036779211,0.0013971133,0.000078392324,0.00015766367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16409892,0.000037342328,0.00006173412,0.052946635,0.00037205155,0.0007532233,0.0005390331,0.00019658229,0.0000477647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075143005,0.000056901143,0.29737034,0.000004153845,0.000049556515,0.0000012145872,0.002454635,0.00013558008,0.00001322355,0.05075049,0.09649591,0.5525928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047187507,0.000106613865,0.099869125,0.00003214222,0.000014346158,0.0000024978508,0.002563535,0.003493546,0.00012778527,0.101955295,0.79123724,0.00012598044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036048186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046911505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69474137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006930225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027536933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99735636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294048888","doi":"10.1126/science.351.6276.927-a","title":"Walking the open science walk","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6756997810208007,"score_gpt":0.6247640097880295,"score_spread":0.050935771232771265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294048888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014765204,0.00046527904,0.0006635647,0.85026723,0.0053653014,0.0009422512,0.0000612436,0.0000425666,0.14071605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064560615,0.00024939692,0.0015739164,0.8224903,0.0051268665,0.00011197765,0.0000029453358,0.000060310897,0.10582371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93479276,0.00039730984,0.0010905063,0.0038842317,0.056563526,0.0032716424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701917,0.010372848,0.0008907895,0.0064038457,0.01140922,0.00073160446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1951636,0.0004084871,0.0005775852,0.08721124,0.005197214,0.056561124,0.12826698,0.00031594664,0.0017086087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13460448,0.00017321306,0.00020828853,0.46489426,0.017156497,0.005575445,0.0322893,0.00200954,0.0036957203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018559488,0.000009019772,0.00046502703,0.0000018400777,0.0000020373539,0.00004670711,0.00007755313,4.4792964e-7,0.0013982715,0.0007212867,0.7736716,0.22360434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013377533,0.00006886413,0.0044024354,0.000034176315,0.0000035499722,0.000032454343,0.00008050862,0.00022786071,0.001400952,0.02713331,0.96613306,0.00034905493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011624564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000834107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.377683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085176603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008189739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294655130","doi":"10.17705/1jais.00417","title":"Rejoinder to the Response to \"The Scholarly Capital Model\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Mittuniversitetet","keywords":"Fallacy; Fetishism; Capital (architecture); Positive economics; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Public relations; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.31070643013841426,"score_gpt":0.48235518115401477,"score_spread":0.1716487510156005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294655130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54882973,0.00014121788,0.18488866,0.253783,0.007378768,0.0020929824,0.00032680473,0.000015146181,0.0025436792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835833,0.0000062596064,0.00014329904,0.0012821644,0.00024558013,0.000024746583,2.780358e-7,0.000004735484,0.014709653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877746,0.00067107804,0.0014684113,0.00010656186,0.009646769,0.00033258056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97806054,0.0067219813,0.0021053692,0.00059679674,0.012293422,0.00022190134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10080459,0.000088078305,0.00020371829,0.008429235,0.000618718,0.005673744,0.002929593,0.00009623295,0.0000081338085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16426866,0.000028681674,0.000268411,0.026366234,0.000015618922,0.0041151955,0.00030122092,0.00020887659,0.0006395692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004859838,0.00002463652,0.012962414,0.000003820247,0.00007597428,1.5077688e-7,0.0055994904,0.026708188,0.00078975625,0.0035017398,0.93345577,0.016392093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065994763,0.00016161877,0.046563976,0.000030500556,0.000009930344,0.000012601398,0.0021549985,0.0052908636,0.0001745783,0.00082008954,0.94403464,0.00008624497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011442311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007826077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43475354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000997909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038079225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99535847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296160973","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0149504","title":"Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publish or perish; Productivity; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Period (music); Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Social science; Positive economics; Library science; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8641365597278564,"score_gpt":0.5361945352035276,"score_spread":0.32794202452432886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296160973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742235,0.00018137516,0.00012334861,0.021137482,0.00004720116,0.00037296873,0.00009310184,0.000030686166,0.003790318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580085,0.00027543397,0.0007480019,0.00033835016,0.00006797127,0.000049354076,0.000009090593,0.000011173461,0.0026997544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854017,0.0008206381,0.00065717206,0.00075588,0.011594993,0.0007696043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859619,0.008588406,0.00020426883,0.0010132496,0.0036202061,0.000611931],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042032585,0.000113997135,0.00027212905,0.052819554,0.00016031976,0.0027205301,0.0025070712,0.00012978629,0.0021467248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18191077,0.000067286936,0.000062371255,0.12797521,0.00025053864,0.00108015,0.000834185,0.00027177422,0.0022964142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022798277,0.0036259666,0.5931697,0.000013682507,0.000085014704,0.000026247018,0.00042990234,2.627687e-7,0.16101909,0.0016795602,0.02284998,0.2168726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017394957,0.00018515879,0.94674796,0.00005652343,0.0000071440645,6.613875e-7,0.00013568788,0.00046534822,0.034874972,0.004272621,0.011303452,0.00021099561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020736708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005359924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35357824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002228564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004559849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298525665","doi":"10.1629/uksg.278","title":"Making OA monographs happen: Library-Press collaboration at the University of Ottawa, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Context (archaeology); Library science; Scholarly communication; General partnership; Revenue; Political science; Order (exchange); Citation; Publishing; Computer science; Business; History; Law","score_opus":0.2981273963048047,"score_gpt":0.4271542118040114,"score_spread":0.1290268154992067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298525665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377396,0.0055391626,0.0033580966,0.030933892,0.0015380307,0.00027502433,0.00011677235,0.000012412794,0.020486988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314165,0.00082104286,0.00009973965,0.00014066506,0.000091408154,2.4968003e-7,5.0129535e-7,0.000005781076,0.0056989603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938822,0.00055083254,0.00040541252,0.00023362951,0.0046245977,0.0003033379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376464,0.003477416,0.00051484484,0.00059527956,0.001458926,0.00018889233],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287508,0.00009670309,0.00016411017,0.004921272,0.0012303733,0.0010938508,0.0031545588,0.00005434534,0.0010593998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026732655,0.000034902354,0.00010887037,0.042999372,0.00030991228,0.0010266291,0.00071032584,0.00021087589,0.0000374793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008018139,0.000039958297,0.03305653,0.0000021445553,0.000060186878,0.00011405738,0.0011159593,0.000094519746,0.0011973587,0.0060192905,0.89241564,0.06580415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041104172,0.000055468598,0.029532844,0.000027879392,0.000008394769,0.000051367253,0.0011260883,0.00049759785,0.0027140945,0.007282713,0.95819575,0.000096791235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056009614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08033547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0747345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015739177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006953995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299920073","doi":"10.1345/aph.19127a","title":"Comment: Publication Rates of Abstracts","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Family medicine","score_opus":0.7618624421105624,"score_gpt":0.6490714974649519,"score_spread":0.11279094464561057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299920073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069777663,0.0040209,0.0000447877,0.9733946,0.0003806893,0.0003949516,0.00048221272,0.000016210464,0.014287938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02613933,0.018734647,0.00019472757,0.94646263,0.00091332087,0.00002260195,0.00015431021,0.000046632653,0.0073318053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880705,0.00042466298,0.0017009794,0.0006500339,0.008548659,0.00060516805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870322,0.0041607334,0.0015349697,0.00096807996,0.0061193355,0.0001847334],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013143099,0.00026238218,0.00070625293,0.044006202,0.000075412376,0.0006639877,0.0036762059,0.00040809956,0.012059062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002555076,0.00019349546,0.0004225013,0.06222799,0.00025284544,0.0005309085,0.00011620526,0.0008648966,0.00031847233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003258138,0.00013780895,0.00029417753,0.000022637774,0.000071503906,0.000006261847,0.000047352154,0.0000066931098,0.0031728756,0.00001864076,0.8607396,0.13544987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032216177,0.00011177174,0.0007897363,0.00001638439,0.0000049477053,0.0000011406664,0.000006238604,0.000104017454,0.13588805,0.0022706548,0.8603294,0.00015551542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012638472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.286362e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13529435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016783422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021336763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98884404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305422018","doi":"10.1002/leap.1015","title":"Small scholar‐led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Scholarly communication; Commons; Public relations; Failure to thrive; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; MEDLINE; Medicine; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.7398215833399304,"score_gpt":0.592642701850462,"score_spread":0.14717888148946845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305422018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94779253,0.0010257686,0.00041144004,0.041064724,0.00070135016,0.0004273598,0.00004951183,0.000032135773,0.008495192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957046,0.00071087386,0.0010267368,0.00085522886,0.0003515442,0.00001924074,0.0000043092605,0.00002791596,0.0012995568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877496,0.0021159253,0.00096680305,0.0014952586,0.006573463,0.0010989798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98637354,0.0052425954,0.0005731078,0.0013306603,0.0052692015,0.0012109135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09497219,0.0002462703,0.0005200788,0.043464195,0.0007115825,0.3449564,0.016499668,0.00033236726,0.00080223096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17028765,0.00013998791,0.000076020544,0.08393888,0.00012068662,0.103188954,0.007863259,0.0017932047,0.000060148475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048320104,0.00007087023,0.53261864,0.0000016174511,0.000009800933,0.000028659357,0.00058519724,0.0000044719022,0.0009932856,0.0014162397,0.0012583301,0.4629646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018834952,0.00015176827,0.9102782,0.00006655248,0.000003787262,0.000016892543,0.003229647,0.00018773171,0.00020932371,0.06124421,0.022381894,0.0003464754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038951752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013763571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4626181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025478497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006042029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98882157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310619103","doi":"10.13021/g8x88s","title":"What Is Open?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Open access publishing; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Point (geometry); Open data; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7956964088141127,"score_gpt":0.6277129605866717,"score_spread":0.16798344822744105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310619103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5347187,0.0008359582,0.0006212327,0.04813303,0.0014667311,0.0025663597,0.00012451048,0.00006011369,0.4114734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663749,0.00080328854,0.002060608,0.0056964196,0.00010813275,0.00014488083,0.000001310393,0.000033081466,0.024777427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98803276,0.00018983765,0.0009698836,0.0017664902,0.0080522625,0.0009887572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304564,0.0037770504,0.0006432928,0.00072327827,0.010945954,0.00086475804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049227946,0.00029466065,0.0005654015,0.01667557,0.00074929424,0.08672636,0.019322865,0.00019740795,0.008601905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06003523,0.00016223351,0.00013909875,0.09488698,0.00030415124,0.051507115,0.012302159,0.00047451572,0.0063198647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019115007,0.00027903722,0.34392458,0.0000063127113,0.00005410328,0.000016668368,0.001489551,1.7456804e-8,0.0065892343,0.025966886,0.1045997,0.5168828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026825613,0.0005257964,0.19006298,0.00029933438,0.000011203475,0.000020549853,0.004692727,0.000018388426,0.048773434,0.38951468,0.36267522,0.0007230999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024397503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057355646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51615965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002582361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040292097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310855618","doi":"10.13021/g8w89v","title":"Participation in the Current System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Dartmouth College; University of Washington","keywords":"Incentive; Publishing; Current (fluid); Public relations; Perception; Business; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.7892528846793322,"score_gpt":0.635582024760357,"score_spread":0.15367085991897522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310855618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016959,0.00024705677,0.0007258154,0.0047610872,0.0003324369,0.0010507803,0.000024924344,0.00002223199,0.091139756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904346,0.000043980137,0.0001687098,0.00024791725,0.00007644819,0.00023117878,7.7827417e-7,0.000008908524,0.00017861137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911138,0.00040698418,0.0008017425,0.0007696524,0.0062843305,0.0006234819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100316,0.004322487,0.0003944179,0.0003662893,0.0036889515,0.00022469212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056303937,0.0001508548,0.0002644553,0.011302309,0.00033576458,0.0081382105,0.005810383,0.00006473756,0.00016818198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05987473,0.00006542653,0.00007089486,0.07491588,0.00013187555,0.005314785,0.0011236238,0.0004334857,0.0010827853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004469329,0.00015051635,0.5478941,0.000009399346,0.000004763434,0.000004874364,0.0010525772,1.14629614e-7,0.00041192397,0.043644752,0.0033309998,0.40345123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007976536,0.00013419984,0.9388151,0.00015772902,0.000004407934,0.0000036618628,0.0018800502,0.00007376986,0.0012078906,0.029622205,0.027120981,0.00018231357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009411004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009869173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40326893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026999065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016291607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313614122","doi":"10.1098/rsos.140540","title":"The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Killam Trusts; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet","keywords":"Metric (unit); Missing data; Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Economics","score_opus":0.6623606050838677,"score_gpt":0.6210994328536711,"score_spread":0.04126117223019665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313614122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3033614,0.06809829,0.254439,0.06547298,0.010640812,0.006598418,0.00031679956,0.00016707218,0.29090524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988094,0.00038459786,0.008266847,0.00026838746,0.000044783585,0.000011840143,8.3778787e-7,0.000006044853,0.002922703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832885,0.00030071952,0.0009055367,0.0008033915,0.013828235,0.0008736196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752203,0.007572931,0.0006505019,0.0015840399,0.01395852,0.00101366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16236994,0.00012801078,0.0003732131,0.0037854163,0.0022772527,0.009090436,0.014353215,0.000067186724,0.000070002796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20810172,0.000068729096,0.0002578206,0.22362609,0.0021746755,0.0012105912,0.004662716,0.00027052726,0.0001457115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030527117,0.00022335771,0.055435136,0.000010440751,0.00003513064,0.0000034054128,0.0012674796,0.00063793897,0.0025939583,0.026414251,0.34945437,0.56389403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016569345,0.0003662881,0.05382425,0.000075086544,0.000027052707,0.000009880533,0.011745151,0.17593595,0.010986645,0.026471548,0.7182898,0.0006114387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005118297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000101318765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68473256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003659245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023129974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315069118","doi":"10.5363/tits.14.8_80","title":"A Report of Visit to Canadian Institutes and Schools by the Japan-Canada WISET Exchange Lectureship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.39528117876506064,"score_gpt":0.5224697027009024,"score_spread":0.1271885239358418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315069118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.879686,0.0014707489,0.000025485002,0.08574532,0.00026545272,0.00018164048,0.000065309214,0.000004382766,0.032555647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960031,0.000030418509,0.00013510139,0.0026325898,0.00003307781,0.0000057045377,0.0000017344063,0.0000016211668,0.0011566738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927064,0.00021085521,0.00044632837,0.0005266931,0.0054781013,0.0006316279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712324,0.00141123,0.00014404961,0.0006119302,0.00034214745,0.00036739712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023777038,0.000114572016,0.00019866684,0.016597766,0.00054155616,0.0012983753,0.003671554,0.000043277425,0.00018182799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013598425,0.00005129211,0.00004025024,0.13563614,0.000392587,0.00030028156,0.00015450268,0.00021201884,0.0000064598075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006405724,0.000029483948,0.053277124,0.0000010785695,0.000003190198,0.0000486298,0.00094027317,0.0000819748,0.00013023755,0.0010712692,0.51360685,0.4308035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000211446,0.00040807368,0.7393026,0.000015138295,0.0000047885674,0.00013559764,0.0027832463,0.0005721357,0.0004718854,0.00841731,0.24743618,0.00024163647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76546365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9367417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68602544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011529919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010750896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317982605","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22479","title":"How do you write and present research well? 8 — Assign authorship according to intellectual involvement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5099878493238604,"score_gpt":0.4760024440835903,"score_spread":0.033985405240270106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317982605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556722,0.0010240341,0.0066680904,0.03579617,0.0003839487,0.00016621017,0.000006934452,0.00000512368,0.00027729207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983683,0.000020950618,0.00044853156,0.000046832352,0.00034600517,0.000003597547,8.920298e-8,0.00001334264,0.00075234845],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418515,0.00015505351,0.00041913366,0.00029369685,0.0041229525,0.00082402973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752034,0.0076979906,0.00009871474,0.00041036186,0.002027959,0.0022446457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02533127,0.00012349151,0.00024285934,0.01937429,0.00019567815,0.0029555988,0.0020395564,0.00010025542,0.0001280261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07576935,0.000060748087,0.00009144832,0.027624762,0.00019948493,0.00035356663,0.00033449873,0.00064877444,0.00003622337],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121660945,0.000046301142,0.01884048,0.000032953667,0.0001496815,0.00025500494,0.0035622183,0.0008220089,0.44283402,0.0051899236,0.116472274,0.41167346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017205401,0.0009130109,0.0040090126,0.00062069716,0.000028485314,0.00034816941,0.002909035,0.011607842,0.3803636,0.017529937,0.57898134,0.0009683018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002896106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006551837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4625091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000505679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005420216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319513970","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2014-0077","title":"Is open-access publishing the wave of the future in science?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.3568832055553049,"score_gpt":0.5642497058865253,"score_spread":0.20736650033122045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319513970","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13874456,0.002744106,0.000003967408,0.015098178,0.8417789,0.00028987825,0.000170435,6.5418527e-7,0.0011693623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7551556,0.00077744736,0.000018307319,0.0020658593,0.24154066,0.000005518397,0.000002516501,0.000011904047,0.00042219023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938434,0.0011310262,0.0009968609,0.000518331,0.0027786754,0.0007317172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98382425,0.0077365586,0.0015499195,0.00054137973,0.005620652,0.00072724314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033439003,0.00018492882,0.0007146774,0.02279091,0.0006667028,0.003652465,0.018359274,0.00057293475,0.0019582424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021125523,0.00008785501,0.00016031192,0.051196158,0.002656628,0.00185293,0.002145432,0.0026003944,0.0000033778956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033161028,0.000013724952,0.0017374603,0.000012530679,0.000026095284,0.00001310686,0.00025851748,0.0000123465015,0.0028493656,0.0001424523,0.989706,0.0051952675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006541333,0.00013462808,0.01977018,0.0000194445,0.000021602087,0.000016992493,0.00015186102,0.000115057344,0.0018038559,0.014112461,0.9630898,0.00010994176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003506199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068098716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61641103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020810618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0130857825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319676922","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2016.01.005","title":"Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Canadian Medical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Statement (logic); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Guideline; Reflection (computer programming); Key (lock); Epistemology; Data science; History; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pathology","score_opus":0.35438733160538916,"score_gpt":0.612797274382186,"score_spread":0.25840994277679685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319676922","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014548819,0.20434548,0.10508706,0.1268036,0.5632601,0.00029955182,0.000040587805,0.0000060388084,0.00014303475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002125116,0.2892853,0.011888592,0.002784358,0.6951862,0.00000808401,0.000003641731,0.000024916915,0.00060637813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95109725,0.0013857216,0.0058133896,0.00063219003,0.04028804,0.00078339677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91170645,0.049407084,0.012739446,0.00066133996,0.022037217,0.0034484759],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35417825,0.00027784632,0.001634936,0.02294399,0.0009139651,0.005403792,0.0044305827,0.00030813308,0.00020534532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5758437,0.00013036821,0.00054992666,0.020281095,0.0006871725,0.0013078087,0.00032661526,0.0012172192,0.000016181222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061192004,0.000017158125,0.00006241,0.00013535075,0.0000142962435,0.000012450648,0.000045595087,8.2892967e-7,9.319117e-7,0.000039697577,0.6205415,0.37912366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008498249,0.00032755843,0.00002892296,0.003388197,0.000031229105,0.00032361687,0.00041551358,0.0033844253,5.7584566e-7,0.0029211952,0.9881684,0.00016051017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009111815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013518784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37896314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032060253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006040922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322690092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.231","title":"A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors for Behind-the-Scenes Data on the Publication Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Public relations; Process (computing); Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6898950649847486,"score_gpt":0.5711992726196081,"score_spread":0.1186957923651405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322690092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6938434,0.0006755136,0.014626514,0.27763057,0.00977943,0.00055417675,0.00038968818,0.000010443286,0.0024902385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995875,0.00004110406,0.00034054945,0.000356972,0.0030748062,0.0000028519391,0.0000020788068,0.000010809845,0.0002958156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739874,0.0007294531,0.0017567261,0.00048853975,0.02240827,0.000629583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79100937,0.03489612,0.006881628,0.0021104817,0.16425006,0.00085232564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35873595,0.00013025355,0.00032468914,0.02571731,0.001753381,0.1313211,0.02284872,0.00013958865,0.00010598024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7175693,0.000048254733,0.00016134154,0.07521176,0.0006696676,0.111660846,0.0012446345,0.0013176369,0.0000075222324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014119205,0.00018721035,0.12756017,0.0000047063995,0.00004680681,0.0000017461795,0.00055733806,0.0000032977098,0.0020390372,0.0019193263,0.61681455,0.2507246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012739016,0.00049779785,0.85067445,0.000082729224,0.000023782863,0.00007213163,0.001776964,0.0006032079,0.002044131,0.013936024,0.1288125,0.00020236199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002407654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000100473935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022417826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029020123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324107625","doi":"10.7202/038161ar","title":"Strategic Science in the Public Interest: Canada’s Government Laboratories and Science-Based Agencies. By G. Bruce Doern and Jeffrey S. Kinder. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. xiii + 235 p., ill., bibl., tab., index. isbn 0-8020-8853-8 50$)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Library science; Index (typography); Media studies; Humanities; Sociology; Management; Art; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10731850456150373,"score_gpt":0.33722763822666096,"score_spread":0.22990913366515725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324107625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042613,0.05636629,0.00003486227,0.032410428,0.0028056514,0.00029728725,0.00006104844,0.000004773903,0.0037583464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797094,0.00086954876,0.00011441909,0.0004609622,0.000019261084,3.412608e-7,1.2907383e-7,0.0000033662911,0.000561019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900771,0.00012207964,0.0006751795,0.0007056987,0.0074988804,0.00092106854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339503,0.00029419066,0.00081269315,0.00080496597,0.0034901856,0.0012029265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021623407,0.00019800222,0.00045614585,0.009093494,0.0014943163,0.00033015932,0.005535053,0.00011346542,0.000108431654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009371185,0.00012282713,0.00003661356,0.04076253,0.03999709,0.0015409663,0.00038211796,0.00040749993,1.0146864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019179053,0.00030495727,0.18818934,0.00009851621,0.000061397055,0.00041686976,0.012655833,0.00006776536,0.124839395,0.10006415,0.45843804,0.11467194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027930567,0.0017376991,0.2500045,0.00038028156,0.00009499463,0.00046997023,0.1007949,0.0024478415,0.0039619757,0.0058855186,0.63064426,0.0007850305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56822944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9442119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3759825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049869074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046722293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333110603","doi":"10.1177/000841740907600201","title":"Are We Ready for an Impact Factor?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.9241897391965286,"score_gpt":0.6855952147089429,"score_spread":0.23859452448758567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333110603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892718,0.0018513674,0.0048976964,0.0025448173,0.00043960026,0.00018360413,0.00045005803,0.0000032102703,0.0003578025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978948,0.00013034191,0.0007586642,0.0006419183,0.00032332467,9.742234e-7,0.0000060081506,0.000006406861,0.00023750852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598837,0.00011216247,0.00057398505,0.00020646374,0.002714724,0.0004043138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133277,0.0010422986,0.00063456706,0.00026588832,0.005285984,0.0014384935],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052973675,0.000111038964,0.0002509153,0.026287185,0.0002449766,0.0012942535,0.0013498088,0.00008148016,0.00082749326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004656937,0.00006998977,0.00022602179,0.020902228,0.000056515764,0.00082585396,0.0000051792235,0.00016316821,0.000018002691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003315365,0.000082796265,0.3590796,5.4361885e-7,0.00003322727,0.000028002069,0.00024575973,0.00031905618,0.0004056463,0.0008876472,0.08487003,0.5537161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005591129,0.0010338355,0.8755556,0.000005069536,0.0000011352843,0.000027638958,0.00010446017,0.00042341914,0.00009587395,0.014965365,0.10713443,0.000094080686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036979714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011775407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55362207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025248123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023613113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999909},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2333683414","doi":"10.1080/09737766.2015.1027095","title":"Analyzing Scientific Activities of the Top Ten Canadian Universities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Impact Fund","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Library science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.26334366484710725,"score_gpt":0.4467679308419103,"score_spread":0.18342426599480305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333683414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603498,0.0007329842,0.0043036337,0.0010494672,0.0022313395,0.00025951874,0.000050408737,0.000003730397,0.031019108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969098,0.00011050164,0.00088979595,0.00008254137,0.000020405809,5.32789e-7,0.0000012431766,0.0000021656226,0.0019830277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913906,0.00010119629,0.0008394859,0.00014416578,0.007180768,0.0003438043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925671,0.00043292297,0.0009037707,0.00038362894,0.00510579,0.0006067506],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026394008,0.00009516639,0.00022811821,0.11710152,0.00045859945,0.0035585267,0.00195864,0.00004701914,0.00005969233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004500165,0.000057534322,0.00011454464,0.18866187,0.00039653224,0.0048201834,0.00067618856,0.00015572578,0.00001122963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008041391,0.00013103838,0.36891192,0.000079916994,0.00018210334,0.000013140948,0.0063782553,0.0050823917,0.000026106922,0.056002762,0.14304711,0.42006484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284337,0.00021776184,0.3660526,0.00004018891,0.000040237548,0.000014444112,0.034212988,0.005208102,0.00025041666,0.0027218193,0.5897533,0.00020375517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042969274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110184366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44670624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048370223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009811842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335326569","doi":"10.1177/0008417414561322","title":"Book Review: What editors want: An author’s guide to scientific journal publishing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7414328447026751,"score_gpt":0.6149463621724781,"score_spread":0.126486482530197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335326569","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08526634,0.66586435,0.008251264,0.1587451,0.078714736,0.0008183053,0.00016825444,0.000016961745,0.002154696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22334915,0.12114676,0.043654352,0.37429988,0.10702259,0.0000575603,0.00021170733,0.0004108238,0.12984717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98499334,0.0005927639,0.0015738625,0.00041905194,0.011684455,0.0007365327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626132,0.0009767419,0.0009603394,0.0006375421,0.027507953,0.0073042223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.065869294,0.00018368571,0.00042012802,0.048739724,0.00078900304,0.036075212,0.004329679,0.000120742014,0.0027476894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057882056,0.00012604774,0.00025395368,0.056485932,0.00021099804,0.0145218,0.000077106946,0.00065481674,0.00018124554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041418916,0.000024758361,0.0041049602,0.0000014846454,0.000014713324,0.00007260585,0.00044101232,0.00012304651,0.000024333882,0.000045244222,0.8991351,0.095971316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048130384,0.0003707261,0.008740489,0.00015358267,0.000003861343,0.00027145035,0.0006808304,0.000106486244,0.00005585503,0.0016905337,0.98728544,0.00015945235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039150138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064721674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5447176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080439216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015212879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336963536","doi":"10.2182/cjot.05.0001","title":"From the Editor: Implications of the Impact Factor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Factor (programming language); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6208624312232792,"score_gpt":0.6112298540747436,"score_spread":0.009632577148535604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336963536","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035510898,0.0058742017,0.0002529524,0.0043297205,0.9397097,0.00032328485,0.013662134,0.0000022697154,0.00033481713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13615744,0.0005027657,0.00008850624,0.00011759163,0.86262125,0.0000036476172,0.00004426067,0.00002025069,0.00044431613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890188,0.00042416333,0.0012509092,0.00030486577,0.008582928,0.0004183577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662701,0.018057125,0.0019505514,0.0010410161,0.011910385,0.0007708407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006822716,0.00022602746,0.00046532188,0.011017902,0.0004449031,0.0013311183,0.0070129302,0.00042005573,0.0023406786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031537596,0.00009722748,0.0007827525,0.02982466,0.0003675959,0.0003585789,0.00008431759,0.001127467,0.000036463447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037682632,0.000021204052,0.034875154,3.0233076e-7,0.00008725218,7.8965246e-7,0.00016987395,0.00007175181,0.00002314573,0.000016799435,0.9385499,0.026146179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023355099,0.00006671696,0.32157427,0.00001290727,0.0000049430732,0.0000016823324,0.000038681446,0.000012468033,0.000015808848,0.0020789597,0.67588514,0.00007489236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01308201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067788623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28669912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006461601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02069586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336996183","doi":"","title":"Research in Canada and the Open Access Imperative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6428178466137359,"score_gpt":0.5444915822340336,"score_spread":0.09832626437970227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336996183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96145344,0.00048797854,0.00008301663,0.020015053,0.00011293126,0.00041371776,0.000016380334,0.0000016991579,0.01741578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976279,0.0001848937,0.00005358983,0.00007497337,0.00001449531,3.90925e-7,5.436506e-7,0.000002298249,0.0020409136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320114,0.0012573919,0.00017807352,0.0003175317,0.0047017094,0.00034413786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889119,0.0075673983,0.0001249632,0.0007090577,0.0024429667,0.00024366882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044320285,0.000059954524,0.00022568768,0.007249859,0.00042114212,0.0013040501,0.009866376,0.00003263839,0.00015303116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005784661,0.000032157124,0.00003296337,0.079708524,0.0008187129,0.0010212717,0.00860756,0.00034131092,0.00002489317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024414784,0.00014275066,0.43552986,0.000012679668,0.0000847369,0.0001963023,0.013731082,0.00061688345,0.000709831,0.032304905,0.40884697,0.10538252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025799114,0.00006871487,0.8779279,0.0000061237315,0.000004728702,0.0000050280014,0.06799134,0.005867696,0.000040126084,0.027686961,0.017727965,0.00009352556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91427743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.442398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003168613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026267988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337529989","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scv038","title":"What determines researchers’ scientific impact? A case study of Quebec researchers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8604730270441896,"score_gpt":0.6730168236645624,"score_spread":0.1874562033796272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337529989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99344045,0.0006927962,0.000029846782,0.0031158435,0.0004736256,0.00053166295,0.0000120902505,0.000019538309,0.0016841219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962648,0.00005189807,0.00006729093,0.00006136299,0.0001081809,0.000019424853,6.7585444e-7,0.000009597876,0.0034167431],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97032607,0.00083160907,0.0008000236,0.0014325241,0.024702452,0.0019073285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96573114,0.0030489054,0.00034343117,0.0022876398,0.023991264,0.0045976406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13297059,0.0002022393,0.00039233707,0.11373351,0.0012637817,0.037701312,0.004758996,0.00009351599,0.00007676125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1986515,0.00012776756,0.000090867805,0.36774755,0.0061466503,0.012196435,0.0031157434,0.00037991029,0.00007400691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051733965,0.0010857288,0.1639089,0.000009018724,0.000021302196,0.00061168126,0.026057981,0.000019608928,0.0013325235,0.0013411035,0.013034413,0.792526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003551703,0.003955894,0.087085515,0.000030351204,0.0000099516365,0.0014836394,0.8406503,0.013583497,0.00063736556,0.01993225,0.028318893,0.00076060224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12481403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022350175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81459236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070373976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021745829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99655807},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2338153978","doi":"10.82308/43227","title":"A bibliometric analysis of Quebec's PhD students' contribution to the advancement of knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Workforce; Sociology; Population; Attribution; Medical education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Library science; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.45461326270658553,"score_gpt":0.5998687920653639,"score_spread":0.1452555293587784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338153978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892404,0.00031551195,0.0061529777,0.0005663894,0.00036944117,0.0006834754,0.00015111642,5.517858e-7,0.0025201107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389464,0.000068607784,0.0012528361,0.000018542987,0.000025544392,0.000019472582,0.000008524857,0.000003870896,0.0047079613],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103755,0.00022060233,0.0009865958,0.0005777659,0.0067976927,0.00037978808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988494,0.0036720226,0.00049871125,0.0012443371,0.0058019883,0.0002889559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032737333,0.000114570044,0.0005475592,0.6162646,0.00014200734,0.0016175049,0.006683954,0.00007451885,0.005351114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030429792,0.000064686166,0.0002197616,0.9377577,0.0001420754,0.0004590903,0.0024792855,0.00017109633,0.0004886034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040096205,0.0004986383,0.1699577,9.3505184e-7,0.00018684767,8.878564e-7,0.0002562814,0.00008479324,0.0063704196,0.00028113232,0.0009717297,0.8213505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040590749,0.00014772576,0.690542,0.0000037095494,0.000100144,2.808842e-7,0.00022991405,0.0010442444,0.01206604,0.000048956015,0.2953247,0.00008638498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011840159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009251222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82126415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058373837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002469461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994189},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2339673439","doi":"10.3390/data1010004","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges (OA APC) Longitudinal Study 2015 Preliminary Dataset","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Computer science; Download; Data science; Metadata; Open data; Open science; World Wide Web; Census; Data access; Longitudinal data; Publishing; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Data mining; Database; Sociology","score_opus":0.9198208547898142,"score_gpt":0.7177078284484214,"score_spread":0.20211302634139283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339673439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9071911,0.0019968657,0.015646996,0.016999364,0.0010137269,0.0029776082,0.051653143,0.00010251908,0.0024186908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728614,0.000059090402,0.0005239921,0.00013015923,0.00011974149,0.000029475472,0.0007596269,0.00001403604,0.0010777495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99052376,0.0002944613,0.00066985475,0.00171475,0.0061136824,0.0006834905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913657,0.002153398,0.00028512307,0.0046508675,0.0010632621,0.00048165678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026418641,0.00017065437,0.00032121828,0.011375601,0.00041746697,0.016468562,0.036098868,0.000056177898,0.0023087736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027902042,0.00008971963,0.00002484797,0.064505234,0.00016614515,0.0139271645,0.047221996,0.00015308936,0.001971128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060634768,0.00045867814,0.3188733,0.0000023892717,0.000009551337,0.000034240355,0.00002434971,3.4333945e-7,0.0001128273,0.000015584452,0.4815855,0.1988226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012332553,0.0003824532,0.8229999,0.000021681513,0.000017782637,0.000013070595,0.00037565903,0.0023742972,0.00035145556,0.0013597714,0.17058787,0.00028281423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003576526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012646311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053021984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027630705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339884644","doi":"10.1177/0340035216628879","title":"Faculty members’ perceptions and use of open access journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFLA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Open access publishing; Work (physics); Open access journal; Access to information; Political science; Sociology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Information access; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.9007622358608833,"score_gpt":0.708625094908831,"score_spread":0.19213714095205237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339884644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845726,0.00039719814,0.0079023875,0.004869781,0.00033095508,0.0001230602,0.00010117765,0.0000036839497,0.0016991609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98939383,0.00306239,0.0020818675,0.0001065481,0.00010849043,0.0000017159169,4.3015666e-7,0.0000075457087,0.00523717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289167,0.00030608606,0.0008122228,0.00031882885,0.0052871904,0.00038402659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909275,0.0032335857,0.00055158534,0.00038664156,0.004208553,0.000692141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017902693,0.00010209951,0.00029967102,0.028365018,0.00039552237,0.021903047,0.004746231,0.000071150265,0.0071215355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610146,0.00004734506,0.00013084385,0.050593246,0.00020818695,0.008457217,0.0026483058,0.00025397286,0.00008124358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026122267,0.000067709836,0.54229146,0.000001088344,0.000024131357,0.000026476675,0.00016509388,0.000008155547,0.0058306037,0.00016116357,0.11138487,0.34001312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072916213,0.00008261309,0.93435085,0.0000658117,0.000006829277,0.00036760626,0.00022427112,0.00010548374,0.0005576162,0.012899195,0.050498333,0.000112201844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070475675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024889243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39205942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006564194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021187708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340061204","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y","title":"Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Austrian Science Fund; Multiple Sclerosis Society; Impact Fund","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Citation; Computer science; Citation index; Library science; Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Index (typography); Scientometrics; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8693361966360683,"score_gpt":0.5759535144275153,"score_spread":0.293382682208553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340061204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921446,0.00032043748,0.10391869,0.0013191287,0.00095562905,0.0006445516,0.0006125288,0.0000069090897,0.00007751803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939979,0.0004799074,0.0049152444,0.000037135505,0.000024350862,0.000011309658,0.000003794743,0.000005120336,0.0005252762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139744,0.00010431869,0.00093649945,0.0007579539,0.0063215876,0.00048221182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95254314,0.030124981,0.0007329033,0.0022990662,0.01395954,0.00034036004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04605835,0.00009658866,0.00024244092,0.10291528,0.00039691658,0.0014502677,0.002508396,0.000045341774,0.000114417286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36143756,0.0000492015,0.000039007307,0.32556343,0.002002122,0.002766682,0.0017667165,0.00006190809,0.000008367295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016940223,0.00022621934,0.64958555,0.000016519767,0.0000103505645,4.5587484e-7,0.00033486992,0.000021669017,0.21301134,0.011333207,0.004210554,0.121232316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012187925,0.00019422578,0.8849644,0.000052436553,0.000015771977,0.0000034501948,0.0003141648,0.0443354,0.015794115,0.0044037965,0.04849716,0.00020626638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017685321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006611066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31537923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011335717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085828133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340281142","doi":"","title":"Детерминанты продуктивности научных исследований в сфере высшего образования: эмпирический анализ","year":2012,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Foresight-Russia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boulevard; Political science; Humanities; Library science; Geography; Art; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6063460508656627,"score_gpt":0.5746615332045012,"score_spread":0.03168451766116154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340281142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43049613,0.075989656,0.01183904,0.009376101,0.028877964,0.004317413,0.0011133124,0.00072116393,0.43726924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93133265,0.0028876623,0.0025817282,0.00096525566,0.0038970378,0.000113491704,0.00008059511,0.00022008087,0.057921473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605747,0.0015840674,0.0036413453,0.0032858222,0.023893187,0.0070208963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765166,0.0076208627,0.0015565288,0.004987724,0.0037156758,0.0056026145],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034548543,0.0016802142,0.0022039867,0.07310286,0.0022709214,0.008414322,0.010408714,0.0016104648,0.03787984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022173204,0.0012520537,0.0015794027,0.20357291,0.0013985691,0.0052382434,0.0044692955,0.0024737814,0.040999435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040087765,0.0025555047,0.2161484,0.00016044996,0.00036601163,0.00021712431,0.0022770015,0.000044122433,0.0016670388,0.033367045,0.56589437,0.17690203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021927587,0.00079406204,0.32620084,0.00015095572,0.00015837672,0.00009872283,0.0008615848,0.003629875,0.004839784,0.009415102,0.64971656,0.001941347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075506617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017723173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50083655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010308087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001616672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343412908","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0154741","title":"Stability and Longevity in the Publication Careers of U.S. Doctorate Recipients","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universiteit Leiden","keywords":"Longevity; Gerontology; Medicine; Library science; Demography; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7471074497942597,"score_gpt":0.5082519046694423,"score_spread":0.23885554512481744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343412908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99392295,0.00014254083,0.00008457371,0.0038739205,0.000027976916,0.00021782232,0.000037149945,0.0000040229747,0.0016890655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945813,0.00014256965,0.00017214092,0.00004256192,0.000011165886,0.000011122904,8.432567e-7,0.0000019544732,0.00015952892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363667,0.00035401588,0.00039870548,0.00034316976,0.0050504296,0.00021699686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993045,0.0037644191,0.00016001714,0.0006899013,0.0022337413,0.00010694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021688923,0.00005230655,0.00016140692,0.008589236,0.00004950854,0.0003646102,0.0010553491,0.000043787542,0.00028631545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05242979,0.000023178332,0.000025936344,0.05578838,0.00019065902,0.0004825389,0.0002438707,0.00007956593,0.00004413279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012614763,0.0004649177,0.95424044,0.00000452169,0.0000053055,3.1354963e-7,0.00017091453,2.141265e-8,0.009941612,0.00020773642,0.00032729362,0.03462433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023411954,0.00007166882,0.9853914,0.00001246662,0.0000028570487,1.373251e-7,0.00010296339,0.000088777735,0.011194069,0.002607395,0.0002520607,0.000042093972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008083959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055189983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04719914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005666966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054011478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344317462","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckv175.055","title":"Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Acces and Subscription Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.968831959127659,"score_gpt":0.7449286306432208,"score_spread":0.22390332848443817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344317462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307994,0.011348349,0.009246905,0.038727198,0.00092183513,0.00024079674,0.000008679314,0.0000037579202,0.008703047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929835,0.0023327435,0.0040344377,0.00034513135,0.00011411248,5.440647e-7,4.6663234e-7,0.0000084195835,0.00018062146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9240887,0.042542588,0.009267918,0.0009787587,0.021643799,0.0014781955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814644,0.0022588298,0.003372804,0.00046618847,0.01097221,0.0014655658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57049006,0.000117477466,0.0008289562,0.032332577,0.00012167761,0.005115402,0.0032343525,0.00002459479,0.00010353612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124743246,0.000071461465,0.00008671718,0.0501648,0.00017050412,0.0043384396,0.0014534075,0.0005172801,0.0000055755904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012081823,0.00027216275,0.5791106,0.000019576837,0.000033076554,0.00003404198,0.0016247076,0.0000135930195,0.000049776434,0.0007976458,0.027031623,0.39100108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014071747,0.0007217491,0.9684178,0.00004965774,0.0000011656127,0.000038434315,0.008874152,0.00011569901,0.0000052963446,0.003082082,0.01721368,0.000073077164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101607184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004700687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4457468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036549324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002347148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345444281","doi":"10.14507/epaa.24.2391","title":"Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening open access scholarly publishing in Brazil","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Political science; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Open access publishing; Library science; Open science; Sociology; Regional science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.5781505496477423,"score_gpt":0.6231597253924955,"score_spread":0.04500917574475327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345444281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92305785,0.0003613811,0.0048744082,0.029082904,0.0001293471,0.0002600591,0.000028171786,0.000019452871,0.042186413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897382,0.0001897951,0.001823349,0.00051443756,0.00017983146,0.00003810198,0.000008831355,0.0000108088625,0.0074966378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930476,0.00076998514,0.0011349779,0.0010271954,0.0033758068,0.0006444243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887113,0.0070559643,0.0009926484,0.00117684,0.0013300274,0.0007332469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018758856,0.0001721042,0.00043703453,0.11083147,0.00040412604,0.069513164,0.006384452,0.00006977894,0.00063418935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17564589,0.00010834347,0.00016149637,0.14593257,0.00019206293,0.02327935,0.0035458545,0.00030707143,0.000030592062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062028794,0.00008367858,0.6038129,0.000001712328,0.00004415138,5.1270183e-7,0.00077866256,0.000012953334,0.00040430838,0.004923526,0.0022177568,0.38771367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003221674,0.00002066065,0.93137914,0.000028229952,0.000024354878,0.0000015838348,0.0008570205,0.0009593728,0.00048015267,0.054106683,0.011640626,0.00018000357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051176124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013228729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3875337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010856375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001573931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347064474","doi":"","title":"La Société de biologie de Montréal","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.16036911103304416,"score_gpt":0.3888945520918772,"score_spread":0.22852544105883302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347064474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54962146,0.2356504,0.030443318,0.1546845,0.0014738126,0.0003895729,0.00045343774,0.0001558207,0.027127672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5353852,0.116781294,0.0036510527,0.00058043806,0.00035365057,0.000008025287,0.0000044179474,0.00004304472,0.3431929],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923228,0.001053285,0.00046930648,0.0010248336,0.0030448202,0.0020849316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98683184,0.009417198,0.00031728315,0.0009944087,0.0010381601,0.001401134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012126934,0.00036794075,0.00051988696,0.016275566,0.0009810828,0.0004925198,0.0030253844,0.0007874785,0.0022891269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011388959,0.00027377182,0.00049573474,0.04421958,0.0007860328,0.00076428213,0.0021717877,0.00050495076,0.002495069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112397436,0.00016487931,0.018661072,0.000010703926,0.00006877964,0.0023810344,0.0002016559,0.000031329422,0.0041768816,0.009967244,0.27153432,0.6926897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015380502,0.00026363536,0.018747892,0.00005215866,0.000051256673,0.0005363721,0.0013884084,0.0018803225,0.0010881656,0.013894244,0.96015316,0.00040631674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01755082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013203675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023668468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085247273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2351189444","doi":"","title":"Community Analysis of Contributors to the Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural science Edition)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Academic community; Statistic; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; History; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3292462983404808,"score_gpt":0.5161310629486875,"score_spread":0.1868847646082067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2351189444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97745776,0.00004525388,0.018822445,0.001891122,0.00035282798,0.0000701638,0.000051797117,0.0000030557949,0.0013055742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910015,0.000022883205,0.0005306856,0.000100007564,0.000022051841,5.1639795e-8,0.0000013186022,0.0000011505501,0.00022172216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144113,0.000310987,0.00047710445,0.00013913798,0.007353229,0.00027840544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837131,0.0032605017,0.00036850944,0.000667958,0.011674456,0.0003154572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03882604,0.00006191007,0.00027535323,0.081660196,0.0006443471,0.00042298174,0.0048817904,0.00002716203,0.00020238747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02771259,0.000032214135,0.00019114546,0.46297398,0.0006436555,0.0007338311,0.00073620805,0.00031610072,0.000022101087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036711944,0.0015214221,0.79396504,0.000005577547,0.00088125584,0.000040193,0.0052021127,0.0710064,0.011830956,0.034143075,0.01691521,0.06412161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040665406,0.0002491171,0.98338395,0.0000033551669,0.00009004467,0.00000494033,0.0058127614,0.0008145298,0.0032886947,0.0006381863,0.005239252,0.000068535745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027773997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002880761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38131377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021500234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000743187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98973083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2352347750","doi":"","title":"Scientometric Analyses of International Scientific and Technological Collaboration in China Agricultural University","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ke-ji guanli yanjiu","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; China; Agriculture; Productivity; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation index; Index (typography); Web of science; Regional science; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Political science; Agricultural economics; Business; Library science; Geography; Computer science; Economic growth; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.5480170889054111,"score_gpt":0.5400153282784598,"score_spread":0.008001760626951349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2352347750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859542,0.0003600929,0.0005642306,0.0002936328,0.00040571613,0.00017723374,0.000045947974,0.00002263289,0.0121763125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965216,0.00010178399,0.0021063923,0.0000054569073,0.000012334884,0.0000011126906,0.0000075777443,0.0000029043179,0.0012408557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414814,0.00017271702,0.0004878725,0.00072566647,0.0041132504,0.00035234028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964496,0.0005901661,0.000274536,0.0004116677,0.0020884273,0.00018562895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008675915,0.00012163655,0.0002647327,0.08500171,0.00022206748,0.0008377886,0.0018905281,0.00013488637,0.0003701635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014469505,0.0000816425,0.00008010605,0.3068876,0.00083000516,0.0009588124,0.00085771445,0.0001879753,0.000041595955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668599,0.00047386155,0.9320994,0.000005320096,0.000022981281,0.000027646916,0.00053105893,0.000026649548,0.018065184,0.008336675,0.0019342912,0.03842024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043649352,0.000096564574,0.98555076,0.000006815802,0.0000054144816,0.000004648949,0.002019656,0.0011874711,0.0057877935,0.002279451,0.0025085427,0.00011636354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019978393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013002151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22188589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014879357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012932267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99383205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238235889","doi":"","title":"L’IMPACT ÉCONOMIQUE DES ACTIVITÉS DE RECHERCHE DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8706807546330027,"score_gpt":0.5824398678235222,"score_spread":0.28824088680948046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238235889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80368835,0.028204015,0.06304227,0.0053818654,0.00036434422,0.00039585732,0.00007325801,0.00009728398,0.09875275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29919946,0.1226549,0.1842026,0.0014882742,0.00048981217,0.000043012056,0.0000055827472,0.00015088198,0.39176548],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97112036,0.020533923,0.0008417365,0.0014879438,0.0020132496,0.0040027658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94181365,0.051607102,0.00036068092,0.0014559975,0.0013421829,0.003420397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13800202,0.00058613624,0.0007468181,0.018187761,0.0008849498,0.002091544,0.0037896466,0.0056706625,0.012893761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.172915,0.00055657024,0.0008094806,0.09089082,0.001769192,0.0012053244,0.0007103548,0.007218393,0.0013736564],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015239329,0.0005444311,0.08802363,0.0000765937,0.00020181111,0.00035307286,0.008564351,0.0005480948,0.015396295,0.0011105804,0.04455325,0.8404755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036163097,0.0017467054,0.15360723,0.00043059245,0.00029762636,0.0018469535,0.0058804494,0.18898928,0.06808121,0.2627924,0.3102343,0.0024769322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021005748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032744242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83799857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07993798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038715273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385065028","doi":"10.29173/cais252","title":"Faculty Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing, E-Print Servers and Institutional Repositories","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Humanities; Qualitative research; Library science; Access to information; Political science; Sociology; Information access; Art; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.39536613943876375,"score_gpt":0.490222336731854,"score_spread":0.09485619729309025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385065028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9415237,0.0013226463,0.000048720223,0.026122302,0.0011428513,0.0008911053,0.0006085818,0.000019351606,0.028320786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903253,0.00074623176,0.0015091414,0.00025299357,0.00017218513,0.000058233538,0.000008545351,0.000017408858,0.006909988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916328,0.0000940752,0.0012499016,0.0009785075,0.0051463754,0.0008983282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64544064,0.0012918779,0.0024542853,0.0007448368,0.3489841,0.0010842464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008807832,0.00040475605,0.0008318077,0.005772397,0.00064099574,0.23440655,0.017999245,0.00040553644,0.00043784626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26043627,0.0002800834,0.00024466202,0.028988112,0.0024062342,0.14182243,0.019747993,0.00072859484,0.000017452208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007136281,0.0003158058,0.8104354,0.0003381181,0.00013846329,0.0000027099666,0.006619152,0.0000082753495,0.0015012316,0.03207334,0.043878615,0.10461753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060973555,0.00024295098,0.8238006,0.0003483438,0.000040148116,0.00004713784,0.002414685,0.0007427238,0.009037463,0.014920739,0.14746398,0.00033148448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01870016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107008666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34619215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024412709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002070189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394801617","doi":"","title":"Is there a gender gap in social media metrics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Citation; Visibility; Dissemination; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Data science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9068326217978037,"score_gpt":0.6403701424126986,"score_spread":0.26646247938510503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394801617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81766886,0.004410098,0.0011477087,0.0031636702,0.001235535,0.00019632294,0.000047794685,0.000036989426,0.17209303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659735,0.00006315817,0.000544026,0.00029991491,0.00022836773,0.000005310653,0.0000015245184,0.000009876613,0.0022504549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884163,0.00022689861,0.0004910416,0.0005263522,0.009785849,0.0005535507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939948,0.0030934787,0.00013413934,0.0004459446,0.001832043,0.0004995927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018698184,0.000116360454,0.00026853892,0.053571973,0.000107674976,0.0012468012,0.0018297638,0.00015801204,0.00128286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05152582,0.00007849695,0.00011040459,0.25015083,0.00010308763,0.00038806463,0.00051567075,0.0002751194,0.0015945336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022835846,0.00018092428,0.33358786,0.0000026679058,0.000009702189,0.000069320704,0.0048304615,0.0000051983566,0.00004662539,0.0026705798,0.4830498,0.17552403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001322455,0.00006262484,0.5438317,0.0000031507875,0.0000042885704,0.0000055184614,0.0045994096,0.003040115,0.00035087267,0.14798357,0.29849356,0.00030272605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006047265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003157309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21024388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016019394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032731055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398145044","doi":"","title":"Local, Networked or External? Inclusion of Regional Journals in WoS and its Effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Web of science; Visibility; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Regional science; Country of origin; Library science; Process (computing); Geography; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.3468037079446216,"score_gpt":0.4807593991302107,"score_spread":0.1339556911855891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398145044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96255165,0.0025240816,0.032133244,0.000107290216,0.00024534235,0.00033022565,0.000007379713,0.000013751463,0.0020870445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896234,0.00031371842,0.0004656522,0.00009013721,0.000034502023,0.0000117137315,0.000003955279,0.0000045451175,0.00011343791],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341303,0.00033530145,0.0012090444,0.0001849422,0.004507157,0.00035050864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944669,0.0019161787,0.0005773374,0.00025100232,0.002463142,0.0003254567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02528605,0.00013061811,0.0003515035,0.022003405,0.00021187382,0.0009166534,0.00080740947,0.00013279267,0.000100746285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023457753,0.000080749815,0.000057705656,0.045450367,0.00016560144,0.003857481,0.0010518718,0.0001930493,0.000060129052],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005608646,0.0000471401,0.053372573,0.00008356749,0.000010980364,0.000013138299,0.00486917,0.0027034415,0.00028976597,0.00037382665,0.005282071,0.93239343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006760255,0.002699219,0.23481798,0.0012418744,0.000017863804,0.0003482272,0.005314275,0.66710085,0.0063295662,0.055863943,0.018752823,0.00075314404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012045199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000203453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002207218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002488363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398291537","doi":"","title":"The Scholarly Communications Needs of Faculty: An Evidence-Based Foundation for the Development of Library Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Demographics; Public relations; Descriptive statistics; Exploratory research; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Library science; Psychology; Medical education; Social science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.7676021748909762,"score_gpt":0.5912851169884951,"score_spread":0.1763170579024811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398291537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6838925,0.0016641034,0.2837407,0.024073802,0.00028146608,0.0012120707,0.000029765997,0.00003909897,0.005066485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96733344,0.00011541741,0.03156928,0.00018159673,0.000014960392,0.000038433463,0.000013660633,0.0000049369755,0.0007283027],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954536,0.0003095915,0.00070575555,0.00015831877,0.0031809208,0.00019178962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96758246,0.027159741,0.00039506506,0.0016499497,0.0031095361,0.000103228434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025577582,0.000068283756,0.00013366842,0.00836367,0.00084990525,0.0030803208,0.006297837,0.000044843746,0.00009116362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011733055,0.000028990831,0.000076304124,0.058826573,0.00023382973,0.002728751,0.00067865313,0.00010007501,0.000022136059],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039938026,0.00010582297,0.07061219,0.000015067646,0.000018132407,4.4368753e-9,0.0008072236,0.00005464945,0.0012476705,0.018446667,0.00088673015,0.9077659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005294611,0.00033611176,0.3764126,0.000054113676,0.000014046768,1.8621604e-7,0.009120228,0.22686286,0.020545773,0.012428457,0.35354006,0.00015607289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054986955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011591257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001630701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040934165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398388134","doi":"","title":"Mapping the Spreading of Cited References over Research Fronts of Bibliographically Coupled Publications.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Information retrieval; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Regional science; Geography","score_opus":0.6159169730986401,"score_gpt":0.5103022726215511,"score_spread":0.10561470047708899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398388134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95174813,0.000469061,0.018161178,0.00038277407,0.00025847513,0.0004893167,0.000042246313,0.0000307222,0.028418096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840903,0.00017184466,0.001138444,0.000031913605,0.000028648088,0.000034123783,0.000020553103,0.0000050039052,0.00016044828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777324,0.0004999954,0.0016462129,0.00023707161,0.009357355,0.00048612469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757272,0.0042306716,0.0009483187,0.00088542857,0.017934887,0.00027351207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.047942992,0.00011952664,0.0003248583,0.1332548,0.00034749202,0.0019292105,0.0024228788,0.00014651853,0.00016159682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06974,0.00007242313,0.0001196922,0.34533417,0.0008450621,0.0041150227,0.00058505364,0.00031136186,0.00007310968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001605465,0.00021840945,0.6643866,0.00015659352,0.00011647286,8.191055e-7,0.015883127,0.00041148518,0.0020598783,0.025549319,0.06710174,0.22395502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008066133,0.0002957134,0.83469933,0.00012907265,0.0000064685414,0.0000065420472,0.016036805,0.057174657,0.0011418872,0.068499856,0.02099261,0.0002104364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082743575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031047162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22374459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014077399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004771264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399886288","doi":"","title":"Are scientists really publishing more","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Publishing; Research centre; Humanities; Political science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.8258740596986458,"score_gpt":0.6279488991770902,"score_spread":0.19792516052155562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399886288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8423871,0.0009444631,0.0022947856,0.014421229,0.0024523432,0.00019463403,0.000045268327,0.00008842934,0.13717178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979516,0.000008541156,0.0013708146,0.0006319185,0.00019184688,0.000004347459,0.0000031291647,0.000009408033,0.018263968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842088,0.00014696634,0.00045456924,0.0006967859,0.013890741,0.0006021169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059355,0.0012392348,0.0003496357,0.00096189644,0.0057138507,0.0011418249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030145105,0.0001083159,0.00021808739,0.038317405,0.00021771573,0.017343057,0.0035339785,0.00010977807,0.00034851505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1811044,0.00007243649,0.000091775466,0.18490465,0.00019027294,0.0027968148,0.0010557764,0.00026725125,0.0012063612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007828755,0.000063832704,0.17988595,0.0000013755855,0.0000034806847,0.00009757759,0.00018306122,0.000025678033,0.00007648971,0.000824856,0.73542345,0.08340639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046472266,0.00004268524,0.4616593,0.000008948575,0.0000017824922,0.000021367203,0.0013161574,0.0025372033,0.00022059605,0.01450943,0.519054,0.00016381248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013027426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037372778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28177333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013683007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032913047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399945540","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.013","title":"Science as a money-spinner?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Thrombosis Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Quality (philosophy); Sentence; Publishing; Computer science; Political science; Internet privacy; Law","score_opus":0.7318513184971535,"score_gpt":0.7031173844164208,"score_spread":0.02873393408073266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399945540","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045249863,0.0013393082,0.00014360648,0.0025855673,0.80407745,0.0009703036,0.00049719727,0.000109065935,0.18575253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028020198,0.005947628,0.00032155975,0.000056042973,0.84166986,0.00017526456,0.000032991487,0.00015486672,0.12362157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.83653575,0.0018910059,0.0017333335,0.0043575834,0.15094095,0.0045413584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7711276,0.10766722,0.0009662328,0.010051714,0.105773844,0.0044134213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24472056,0.00062804186,0.0013967934,0.29469675,0.0028966863,0.018301155,0.029507043,0.0015409349,0.0070822174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6040683,0.00038140937,0.0004947071,0.50269395,0.007963501,0.0019977926,0.012546711,0.004527935,0.046188135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034105364,0.00018911522,0.00015031514,0.000017094546,0.000028285152,0.000027757236,0.000081035425,3.6245248e-7,0.004205154,0.0021480706,0.953349,0.039769687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004900501,0.0007844591,0.000890126,0.0001082303,0.00000638559,0.0000018349727,0.00015940946,0.00008096379,0.0013782589,0.026468137,0.9691104,0.00052173674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009646072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003827879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3593477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023762442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019714428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404055720","doi":"","title":"Re-citation Analysis: A Promising Method for Improving Citation Analysis for Research Evaluation, Knowledge Network Analysis, Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Data science; Weighting; Representation (politics); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.7525166480474529,"score_gpt":0.6656323923442183,"score_spread":0.08688425570323455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404055720","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07356228,0.002139854,0.91913605,0.00061051163,0.000323853,0.0024330912,0.000073448486,0.00004172848,0.0016791784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921525,0.000038120957,0.07623122,0.00003251221,0.00026966838,0.00035442674,0.00076766283,0.000015644237,0.00076575676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854853,0.0027275248,0.0018850188,0.0012713596,0.0077430927,0.00088767183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362488,0.018562516,0.001045776,0.0010608163,0.042465597,0.0006164996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1915538,0.00024249988,0.0008657354,0.13176188,0.0009438679,0.004678713,0.00096211536,0.00027184145,0.00006103644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17625944,0.00020293733,0.0006870262,0.49993977,0.00012368102,0.0035346034,0.0003250968,0.00026777154,0.000030383748],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011307836,0.00032021516,0.15556917,0.00011559166,0.0075754495,6.209744e-7,0.01701328,0.16500862,0.00043535713,0.0026906827,0.020856354,0.62928385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011861973,0.00022170591,0.10639862,0.0000056823214,0.00461543,2.4613678e-7,0.0044211564,0.8665839,0.00022114757,0.012743747,0.003384135,0.00021803523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023330323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094181957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84796274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006314158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000901173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407021461","doi":"","title":"A Computer System for Automatic Evaluation of Researchers' Performance.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Competition (biology); Data science","score_opus":0.9069353518281346,"score_gpt":0.6606327712208294,"score_spread":0.24630258060730514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407021461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779825,0.0003453373,0.012951698,0.0002380523,0.0005731519,0.00062391756,0.0000118520375,0.000022412438,0.007251036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943532,0.0000030501224,0.0049932026,0.000009455562,0.000088786546,0.00003674793,0.0000022117044,0.0000053069934,0.00050806254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857561,0.00035632736,0.0005010126,0.00030139642,0.0127716055,0.0003135658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679495,0.00196726,0.00017666118,0.00049676374,0.01026234,0.0003020167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08587542,0.00006454394,0.00020761418,0.017787261,0.00008137159,0.0005184718,0.0010964953,0.000060851045,0.00009838531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021782927,0.000041886073,0.00007510689,0.049233083,0.00007582201,0.00034011842,0.00023475144,0.00007523673,0.00019489975],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026289861,0.00006920225,0.015546326,0.000052977968,0.0000130572025,5.8411655e-7,0.00045374045,0.0007321884,0.00010966819,0.00034442882,0.037803106,0.9448484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090742845,0.00029324833,0.02476042,0.000023868311,0.0000072255007,0.000002437977,0.0005832947,0.96712005,0.00096684083,0.0009821685,0.004296305,0.000056709065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021914806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001764367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96638787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023843761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062061416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407471590","doi":"","title":"Topical Impact Analysis - A New Informetric Indicator for the Assessment of a Scientific Institution.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Informetrics; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Library science; Social science","score_opus":0.36218617606028575,"score_gpt":0.5208127322852348,"score_spread":0.1586265562249491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407471590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4067744,0.00023449605,0.58755344,0.0001807625,0.00057854375,0.00062415283,0.00009352207,0.00002293785,0.0039377194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942975,0.0000137817515,0.005261377,0.000042573847,0.000051653675,0.000036621117,0.000043500157,0.0000029055095,0.00025009573],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925759,0.00008534091,0.0012542421,0.00022090554,0.0054494655,0.00041418112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920577,0.0017810746,0.00081572315,0.0007508733,0.0041277157,0.00046694002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018655263,0.00013563478,0.0003602115,0.049574703,0.00047517708,0.0038677796,0.001587579,0.00011032394,0.00013849369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036382757,0.00007430974,0.00037465844,0.17386028,0.00041639636,0.0038888794,0.0003170884,0.00014487964,0.00006484788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005544276,0.0000724647,0.44692484,0.000027791288,0.0002699497,3.705136e-7,0.0022883392,0.008685955,0.000018012388,0.010027061,0.02279045,0.5088393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008598655,0.00034694796,0.76890576,0.000007870139,0.00010861605,0.0000049583778,0.0013742014,0.18420354,0.000109121625,0.008216892,0.035700887,0.00016132674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003481164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000239568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5875231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005976478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002357556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407843740","doi":"","title":"Taking the plunge: open access at the Canadian Journal of Sociology .","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.9397650483329004,"score_gpt":0.7333829324763228,"score_spread":0.20638211585657762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407843740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73846173,0.0007270413,0.0009200826,0.042229876,0.00083695835,0.00089467375,0.000042391435,0.0000043217956,0.21588293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958544,0.000115986084,0.000035360743,0.00066008937,0.00008090349,0.000013776678,0.0000025265028,0.000002819134,0.0032341518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878833,0.0009729999,0.0008534074,0.00013551647,0.009452804,0.0007019464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97784007,0.008690174,0.0005569855,0.00071333617,0.011789438,0.00041002355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.086390905,0.0000657911,0.0001584021,0.025543546,0.0042996528,0.010677003,0.014184314,0.00010247103,0.0055747167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079600394,0.000028037812,0.00008225224,0.07020657,0.0016508711,0.0046817437,0.0033142027,0.0008652447,0.0011391166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003944741,0.000013235386,0.16379525,0.0000031521936,0.000020435848,0.000017440902,0.008125141,0.0003650168,0.00001467573,0.005407985,0.7228362,0.099362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002476284,0.000066316345,0.3789624,0.0000029448274,7.52781e-7,0.000090876885,0.0015480103,0.0013804322,0.00012766337,0.005029085,0.61249584,0.000048013408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03497399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027608711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25739267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046666307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004528467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408332672","doi":"10.29173/cais856","title":"Exploring Author Similarity Using Citing Discipline Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidimensional scaling; Similarity (geometry); Citation; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.5936086054044273,"score_gpt":0.48107286183188674,"score_spread":0.11253574357254054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408332672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792122,0.0009632087,0.0019914443,0.0130607085,0.0008613013,0.0003621693,0.0008299542,0.000027234439,0.0026917546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242985,0.0008381226,0.0022485775,0.000058256053,0.00025949598,0.000016992037,0.0000014946544,0.000030629355,0.0041165827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893516,0.00015925997,0.0018221409,0.0011259709,0.0061226333,0.0014184339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72853434,0.0049488153,0.003279611,0.00096035877,0.26125306,0.0010238031],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01637468,0.00048695973,0.0012969415,0.019410681,0.0005540609,0.014095901,0.0068415026,0.0003284129,0.00034886284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31907701,0.00029477658,0.00091638503,0.09613159,0.0016966824,0.029874787,0.0045960043,0.00056074816,0.000015222781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012527316,0.0003290323,0.8031636,0.00021126753,0.0005534057,0.0000047002604,0.009737383,0.000051810668,0.03524594,0.008027839,0.00082860497,0.14172117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017447807,0.0007377252,0.75454485,0.0017335825,0.0016257063,0.000048216873,0.016599674,0.033444766,0.10363871,0.024832254,0.05960718,0.0014425687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008422562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004043847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30270234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003381768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083911157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409294402","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2015-0188","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.6245645015783493,"score_gpt":0.5747646215364831,"score_spread":0.049799880041866196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409294402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98896676,0.0014922627,0.0012979095,0.00091917795,0.0006187068,0.0010288826,0.000043141215,0.000025702822,0.0056074327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996445,0.0002489388,0.0017203975,0.00059276685,0.00028732335,0.00024615257,0.0000146641505,0.000011258223,0.00043348377],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760735,0.00010311697,0.00035152768,0.0007130428,0.0008362844,0.00038867834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729854,0.0011142788,0.00014221377,0.00031504556,0.0006934173,0.00043652143],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047720433,0.00014191178,0.00041567243,0.006336471,0.00026483147,0.0025957518,0.0013741087,0.00012760672,0.000037607133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024006653,0.00010203241,0.00004299149,0.01211245,0.00016538046,0.00090076495,0.0017369362,0.00014165862,0.0000178544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093543436,0.0006660976,0.0048219603,0.00014116241,0.00014103923,0.0000035755954,0.0011307119,0.00002670564,0.16319144,0.19209957,0.096528634,0.54031366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003949469,0.000024488074,0.27351147,0.000006640894,0.0000166414,0.000004528657,0.00027845893,0.000627416,0.004176112,0.2636371,0.4535535,0.00021417101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005212633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004008059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5400995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013859293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005110224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411736692","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100051751","title":"Reproduction of Tables: Are Some Publishers Ignoring Fair Use/Dealing?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.36360645825098276,"score_gpt":0.4455562030640123,"score_spread":0.08194974481302952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411736692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876342,0.0008214655,0.00007540329,0.005625142,0.0044619534,0.00016797002,0.000028607077,0.000015853795,0.0011694367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951456,0.00022429471,0.0029487542,0.0009645391,0.00059838634,0.0000018396091,2.5853416e-7,0.000012806014,0.00010348787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864119,0.0013650347,0.0022145878,0.0012590846,0.0067240116,0.0020253295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98156387,0.004835456,0.003065203,0.000644131,0.00618539,0.0037059402],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058196895,0.00037438548,0.00085442734,0.02857638,0.0032438869,0.009774652,0.008405134,0.00034898502,0.00050594454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14624292,0.00023255334,0.00046185232,0.049182173,0.010294412,0.0093524465,0.0003220254,0.0026486309,0.0000085180545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004156337,0.000047460497,0.9784544,0.000003848214,0.0000106010175,0.0010854426,0.0001744185,0.0024677261,0.0004086475,0.0018705737,0.0042633177,0.011171999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055474776,0.036068965,0.7944343,0.000047709756,0.0000378102,0.014199391,0.0017335716,0.0033925248,0.0014160702,0.1125055,0.03488995,0.0007194443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003696268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051520318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18402009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002034421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005006322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418684042","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000001261","title":"Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Task (project management); Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.7712254249724037,"score_gpt":0.6039173745100554,"score_spread":0.1673080504623482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418684042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916154,0.00025514167,0.00022900614,0.0064813974,0.00024369668,0.00040379452,0.0000068864824,0.0000045348997,0.0007601034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988966,0.00020155287,0.0000019111721,0.0004218544,0.000048413873,0.000020289739,4.5932527e-8,0.000003967207,0.00040536377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98474956,0.00039832396,0.001120997,0.00062521506,0.012381114,0.00072480104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802642,0.01673955,0.00046080715,0.00079560914,0.0014229942,0.00031685963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064533755,0.0001310426,0.00053525355,0.02801494,0.000100290104,0.00003700126,0.0040911124,0.00010517189,0.00079743995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13455182,0.000046464535,0.000034238983,0.10823251,0.0018070686,0.00022545418,0.00047600578,0.0004044107,0.000021492293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006135348,0.00009236138,0.96182334,0.0000035476642,0.000011856318,0.0000021822004,0.013103657,5.409546e-7,0.009906238,0.0034248151,0.0026182146,0.008951896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002001141,0.0014930898,0.92842805,0.00008651075,0.000005555216,0.0000011749325,0.035714727,0.00013640305,0.005538207,0.0261003,0.00039409223,0.000100744546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020641714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006264277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08021758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021531011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028201778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418933540","doi":"10.1002/14651858.ed000048","title":"Measuring the Performance of the Cochrane Library","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cochrane Library; Medicine; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Cochrane collaboration; Computer science; Information retrieval; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.4596414138216831,"score_gpt":0.5011663737875138,"score_spread":0.04152495996583072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418933540","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010387638,0.59665996,0.000084436135,0.00012191871,0.39465073,0.0044387053,0.0013120485,0.000012883418,0.0016805282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011113032,0.75162715,0.00065507094,0.00006670153,0.22671859,0.00069339783,0.0003491522,0.00012999628,0.008646928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96044415,0.004543936,0.0062590935,0.00085675565,0.02714879,0.00074725825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180419,0.056337688,0.009340764,0.010763479,0.0051083053,0.00040788282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11768775,0.0005305408,0.0038654183,0.009267002,0.0003199674,0.00076555426,0.013903258,0.00038020388,0.0007345475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26462403,0.0001995046,0.0010809177,0.06612622,0.0005423659,0.0011657423,0.0030166744,0.0011029479,0.00060335064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010625899,0.0000701653,0.0002694081,0.22942603,0.000041935848,9.357819e-7,0.00008679561,0.000001571064,0.000120565805,0.00004413991,0.7693378,0.00059002434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005475503,0.00012514187,0.0003089005,0.38171446,0.000527668,0.000018953222,0.00020302793,0.00055085786,0.0016474637,0.00004120048,0.61375195,0.0005628442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037193946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004201537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16793215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006808529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007124858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423366126","doi":"10.18438/b85p87","title":"E-Journal Metrics for Collection Management: Exploring Disciplinary Usage Differences in Scopus and Web of Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publication; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Discipline; Journal ranking; Proxy (statistics); Computer science; Download; Publishing; Impact factor; The Internet; Web of science; Citation impact; World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.4265154132052441,"score_gpt":0.48440355262765317,"score_spread":0.05788813942240906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2423366126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92036843,0.0017851884,0.046415653,0.02517327,0.0007907821,0.0007927272,0.00002758293,0.000026498048,0.0046198643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788009,0.01185028,0.008569921,0.0004864264,0.000022865881,0.000030949614,5.811609e-7,0.0000030816086,0.0002350091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568766,0.00019834678,0.0007787579,0.00026947586,0.0027743848,0.00029137588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820047,0.016221207,0.00061750953,0.00024278277,0.0006848788,0.0002289228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017867578,0.00009706995,0.00017912568,0.036498073,0.0004713921,0.0024584287,0.0007916539,0.000042083775,0.0000614425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048255514,0.00005747441,0.00003452375,0.069145314,0.00042238762,0.24484219,0.00049774174,0.00012678829,0.0000058771625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011433248,0.00014952895,0.1967614,0.00018578538,0.000016009204,0.000008553308,0.00047698518,0.000027158589,0.0014866465,0.091680646,0.0011459881,0.706918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025634577,0.0013100046,0.85981166,0.0009864914,0.000027243937,0.000057920366,0.005846943,0.038147118,0.0075932434,0.007272196,0.07599769,0.00038604598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019224683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.0161958e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70653194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003593197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003703566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2425105866","doi":"","title":"Influence of cognitive, geographical, and collaborative proximity on knowledge production of Canadian nanotechnology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Cognition; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.3278262243615762,"score_gpt":0.36775583302415793,"score_spread":0.03992960866258172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2425105866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956204,0.00021199319,0.0003341258,0.0002649928,0.00020344778,0.0005766245,0.00025625,0.000015163753,0.0025169826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810493,0.0011959362,0.000033519314,0.000009152811,0.000014637642,0.0000017116146,0.0000031410332,0.000007254919,0.00062973815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968932,0.00032598828,0.0004167848,0.0012413205,0.0007400207,0.00038268563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888519,0.0019995377,0.0005721872,0.00079940027,0.0074266326,0.0003503254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003830836,0.00020123296,0.00048626025,0.086515285,0.00015883353,0.000096671254,0.001444038,0.00048046265,0.000030934403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018834656,0.00015800816,0.00010335353,0.1264527,0.001461577,0.0002963353,0.0011983133,0.00047772136,0.000023171546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038754064,0.00072653336,0.88601106,0.00016137508,0.00024964946,0.00007226379,0.0005655033,0.0055472176,0.0024732526,0.085856736,0.001362076,0.016586786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016727996,0.0012333483,0.752604,0.0009174371,0.000099062,0.000005535527,0.0013703787,0.0030488595,0.023828372,0.21200067,0.0023050024,0.0009145066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065335124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13340703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001296241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011264482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2432555349","doi":"","title":"Geographic variation in the number of authors on scientific abstracts.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Presentation (obstetrics); Radiological weapon; Exhibition; Geographic variation; Demography; Variation (astronomy); Library science; Family medicine; Geography; Environmental health; Archaeology; Surgery; Population","score_opus":0.5064724228899031,"score_gpt":0.513383104122977,"score_spread":0.006910681233073923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2432555349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546775,0.000046661527,0.000070361064,0.0012355051,0.00063264277,0.00027768142,0.000006779705,0.0000068241957,0.04304604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971798,0.000021737163,0.00004623326,0.000078273566,0.000034261528,0.00009056988,0.0000014035539,0.0000034994093,0.0025441896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99053365,0.00028628862,0.000607709,0.00046984627,0.007583914,0.0005186162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950243,0.0030671968,0.00022546931,0.0007120077,0.00082324294,0.00014775374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056052983,0.00007522744,0.00014234224,0.032211397,0.00014362972,0.0016710078,0.0018517957,0.00007386773,0.00020312467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023119573,0.00004198524,0.000094882074,0.19881731,0.00018283099,0.0003318201,0.00011848535,0.00021485984,0.00022026297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019749217,0.00028379413,0.6674373,0.0000014062181,0.00000390431,0.000009631383,0.00018443815,0.00010254033,0.000028623796,0.0022834705,0.0025818837,0.32706323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016478094,0.000009137019,0.97116786,0.0000012184438,0.0000014164864,0.0000037874076,0.00007842355,0.00018548404,0.00004034721,0.009614473,0.018683093,0.000049962302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001959533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045943787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32701325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036023972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004224812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461193309","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.16.00643","title":"Introducing JBJS Open Access","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Mandate; Editorial board; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5767792694335799,"score_gpt":0.5971407920401144,"score_spread":0.020361522606534455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461193309","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069564297,0.006276304,0.0008317147,0.003813213,0.97995275,0.00016099468,0.000095269745,0.0000053845934,0.0019079562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004923048,0.020365322,0.00037403515,0.00013480813,0.9652162,0.0000038413878,0.000006183916,0.000042918895,0.008933628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793997,0.00053317903,0.0037851648,0.000734797,0.01490899,0.000638181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916755,0.05902124,0.007188256,0.0011935965,0.014728935,0.0011129777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13005456,0.00027997445,0.0024822582,0.10261163,0.00025257838,0.017652951,0.0022246328,0.0005018867,0.00097443257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32325843,0.00015083207,0.0007339469,0.044011973,0.00017545503,0.003994249,0.0049275625,0.0012116967,0.00008613605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008453112,0.000053645872,0.0025130329,0.000021627024,0.00004481054,0.00027162253,0.000014304296,6.994254e-7,0.000075869975,0.0000070117817,0.8868788,0.11003408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003695956,0.00009362192,0.004156817,0.0003466555,0.000019927058,0.000076786084,0.000031343327,0.0000071989452,0.00010225276,0.0042678826,0.99029684,0.00023106764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097932294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007932616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19320388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001672911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025298097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462061600","doi":"10.4000/quaderni.984","title":"La perception de l’innovation chez les chercheurs canadiens des sciences dites dures","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nutrition Society; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.6861497238239205,"score_gpt":0.5698617550031948,"score_spread":0.11628796882072567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462061600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94896847,0.004387239,0.010577708,0.015432923,0.00075297774,0.00018024638,0.00009408602,0.000043788124,0.019562554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565926,0.0028426894,0.003209282,0.00018281066,0.00031745905,0.0000134861375,0.0000022001288,0.000020111347,0.036819346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911982,0.0012275416,0.00073000113,0.0009435687,0.004484724,0.0014159967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887175,0.0071855905,0.00030229878,0.00046552683,0.0028074833,0.00052161067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036430318,0.00026413423,0.0002956195,0.030517438,0.0013364109,0.0023729072,0.0019384928,0.00043429533,0.0066693514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057995956,0.00016902888,0.0001410387,0.118463986,0.0058913054,0.0012963308,0.00033831157,0.00037651445,0.0010176096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008595649,0.00010119589,0.2839919,0.000019702626,0.000011608588,0.000016145637,0.0015432388,0.000012849609,0.0132231265,0.008300964,0.0096380515,0.68313265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045658034,0.0004110609,0.80620486,0.00019396305,0.000016117345,0.00007917318,0.005464841,0.0019930953,0.002858634,0.046515394,0.13536103,0.0004452574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015162632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003757821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68268734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013544341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014947875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462808935","doi":"10.1017/s148180350000587x","title":"Canadian investigators receive research awards","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; China Academy of Engineering Physics; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Action (physics); Medical education","score_opus":0.8547105251632994,"score_gpt":0.6424567869925976,"score_spread":0.2122537381707018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462808935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7395875,0.010787592,0.00017504238,0.07533561,0.02221207,0.00028600587,0.000038173155,0.0000058079345,0.15157223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97775775,0.0022975975,0.00010416478,0.00034438365,0.0018362507,0.0000024405651,0.0000026917335,0.000021647424,0.017633092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98657185,0.0006804101,0.0017134007,0.00044150147,0.008993722,0.0015991193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96840835,0.0014662532,0.00042771798,0.0007789839,0.016841877,0.012076807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059127465,0.00018141327,0.0004953555,0.13071568,0.0007760396,0.00023573109,0.0037310615,0.00018407186,0.031535268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16871035,0.000122047284,0.00016942828,0.18364932,0.0005701202,0.0005546577,0.00006481809,0.0011315272,0.0004639933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055840615,0.0000066523785,0.25731596,0.0000018968466,0.000018108805,0.00048369283,0.00057514873,0.000017116572,0.000061922794,0.0006666809,0.72900766,0.011839562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002917406,0.00046476937,0.069418326,0.000044862787,0.000007910526,0.000067444234,0.0022049567,0.00011143398,0.000029358864,0.020142648,0.90707874,0.00013777775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7168575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89904356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23817025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012760591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014741438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462819058","doi":"10.1101/062109","title":"A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Skew; Computer science; Transparency (behavior); Protocol (science); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23971129138092004,"score_gpt":0.4459265289678294,"score_spread":0.20621523758690938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462819058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1580552,0.0015795649,0.81975406,0.012218103,0.0027141704,0.0022189429,0.0033485224,0.000079949525,0.000031463005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942506,0.00020778194,0.004754541,0.00004456557,0.0004736533,0.00021512358,6.937249e-7,0.000028968796,0.000024093364],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243164,0.0003021142,0.0012181744,0.0007719704,0.0046825395,0.00059358816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97070843,0.0043628826,0.001546005,0.0016131881,0.02139913,0.00037033862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02406878,0.00024679172,0.00040895882,0.014202403,0.00061395165,0.0034475436,0.0032517212,0.0003150757,0.00014607754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07723107,0.00013948763,0.00033416366,0.03924965,0.00029011135,0.0005449491,0.00091455533,0.0005373836,0.00005533304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021844616,0.0010141105,0.10120557,0.00027160277,0.0006147059,0.000009710283,0.00004519526,0.00011409889,0.5381859,0.14146365,0.21505226,0.0018047236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015724673,0.00031842987,0.7252019,0.00015524404,0.00015196778,7.697274e-8,0.000028219438,0.009022642,0.1273089,0.009396767,0.12596016,0.0008832382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012361344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014509678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8361954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003239919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002710719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99758697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465898896","doi":"10.13021/g82c7p","title":"Report from the Participation in the Current System Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Incentive; Publishing; Public relations; Perception; Business; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4865056503194264,"score_gpt":0.5105701192337794,"score_spread":0.024064468914352988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465898896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97360665,0.00046301875,0.013925661,0.0081686545,0.000470207,0.0002846935,0.0000391223,0.000013735474,0.0030282775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989938,0.000068331356,0.00017497921,0.000027638429,0.00007215916,9.2711235e-7,0.0000024882324,0.0000024676583,0.000657177],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465865,0.0004708041,0.00032060948,0.00039261547,0.0038997764,0.00025753706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907857,0.007232323,0.00033413607,0.0008701279,0.00067442463,0.0001032951],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011441005,0.000071825874,0.00017518312,0.004457274,0.00024236558,0.00022214737,0.0023747722,0.000052767704,0.00018841441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005134902,0.000033442207,0.00011510448,0.040943637,0.00019330485,0.00037929288,0.00042509782,0.00015101716,0.00022835017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035425965,0.00012663292,0.3982812,0.000002750638,0.000009175873,0.00008320679,0.0008567727,0.000010681579,0.00009238125,0.0015950835,0.020505147,0.57840157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036727372,0.000030179921,0.9265618,0.000039182392,0.0000071573463,0.000002757014,0.0029429405,0.0009350734,0.000012915923,0.0020722752,0.06696719,0.0000612761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006443161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006815395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5783403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010700228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012345395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468380519","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.347","title":"A Scientometric Analysis of Scholarly Publication in the Fields of Management, Operations, Economics, and Business from Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Scientometrics; Library science; Political science; Bibliometrics; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37069782300633775,"score_gpt":0.46499292305470313,"score_spread":0.09429510004836539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468380519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97075564,0.0016374,0.008471626,0.017021611,0.00024069582,0.00013189913,0.00006500321,0.0000020863931,0.0016740642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944017,0.0018852089,0.0032165614,0.0002465334,0.0000605182,0.0000022856213,0.0000037734471,0.0000049482005,0.00017845577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911369,0.00049939007,0.0018950263,0.0004139903,0.0057645584,0.00029014653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774351,0.00443429,0.0013613695,0.00080701814,0.015727034,0.00023515415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06928861,0.00011140809,0.0004963347,0.17130075,0.00015434004,0.06917071,0.004526788,0.0001608977,0.000134045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13462634,0.000058507576,0.00019018189,0.29647022,0.0001483629,0.10024005,0.0005918857,0.00058103714,0.000003169956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031655552,0.0001805347,0.78147274,0.000005261777,0.000253154,0.0000041455155,0.0004662533,0.00020655419,0.0008556276,0.00538309,0.0022416436,0.20889935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080947345,0.00007156936,0.9890478,0.00003132193,0.00009675792,0.000003907071,0.0011787438,0.0008870789,0.00013830789,0.0039538033,0.0037007907,0.00008044634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050015084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016916932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20881891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021854133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95836323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468587249","doi":"10.1177/0306312716650046","title":"Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universiteit Leiden","keywords":"Seniority; Division of labour; Multidisciplinary approach; Attribution; Task (project management); Order (exchange); Discipline; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Social psychology; Management; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.6465280787421486,"score_gpt":0.6314724477536953,"score_spread":0.015055630988453306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468587249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941554,0.0026971872,0.000049498885,0.0019824612,0.00041503078,0.000120471064,0.000011254274,0.0000035325825,0.00056514906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.00057667325,0.00006830259,0.000004870117,0.000034079254,0.0000031236018,2.3738817e-8,0.0000015076,0.00030696124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529445,0.00010737963,0.00045450663,0.00042672257,0.0034029305,0.00031398764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921876,0.002435316,0.00023885067,0.00017743229,0.004882256,0.0000785111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026876269,0.000060852097,0.0002794008,0.011981109,0.00034837722,0.00007851808,0.0008452506,0.000033097247,0.000009644365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10836845,0.0000319342,0.00003425778,0.09694105,0.005304238,0.0005415989,0.0008099385,0.00004864581,0.000006555003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017443264,0.00010307723,0.6025672,0.000011914129,0.0000050847407,3.8826943e-7,0.0034391657,2.9061758e-7,0.057365064,0.0046557556,0.00082819303,0.33100644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028195782,0.00010115121,0.96051186,0.000030207557,0.000001049838,1.6088752e-7,0.0033631593,0.000008446379,0.020137474,0.014924625,0.0005818583,0.00005805465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029854802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004733773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35794467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010256161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016391109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469562255","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22578","title":"How do you write and present research well? 16—Target an audience and promote","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Web of science; Citation; Index (typography); Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3132357927969183,"score_gpt":0.4544128314760489,"score_spread":0.14117703867913056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469562255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97977716,0.0023541157,0.000822354,0.016586356,0.00014300189,0.00009754445,0.000008867386,0.000003386784,0.00020721718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986139,0.00005673033,0.00054520345,0.000017108785,0.0001987818,0.0000014448113,9.077247e-8,0.000008859534,0.00055789825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588543,0.00009135038,0.0002848625,0.0002674426,0.002849834,0.0006210843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994793,0.0017122441,0.000091586226,0.00034065152,0.0014308157,0.0016317056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014827688,0.0000979951,0.00019477191,0.009306086,0.00018282268,0.0021503249,0.0013201302,0.00007693815,0.000062854226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018058985,0.000046553647,0.00004448585,0.013954486,0.0003842609,0.00061806565,0.00018653907,0.00044711545,0.0000050683425],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007514588,0.000058170124,0.032432564,0.00004875209,0.00009145883,0.00037199853,0.0016359019,0.00022482182,0.3849066,0.004650685,0.021281874,0.55422205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026120173,0.0011742739,0.026507147,0.00044540034,0.00002689921,0.0015772831,0.0007601934,0.03298834,0.32435,0.049045827,0.559441,0.0010716437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000284175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000776658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5531504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001931797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003445996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470086034","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2015-0050","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.6880226861145621,"score_gpt":0.6003016480631788,"score_spread":0.08772103805138332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470086034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735126,0.0010529712,0.000527147,0.0003511235,0.00023967777,0.0001688764,0.00003127958,0.000007962847,0.024108382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357784,0.000044360993,0.00043472563,0.00010160419,0.00011025036,0.000017696186,0.000008388969,0.0000045177903,0.0057006394],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837434,0.000053562155,0.00024741032,0.00060560193,0.0004039279,0.00031515388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977888,0.0009612453,0.000101052676,0.00027658383,0.0004890121,0.00038333936],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050454754,0.00010012087,0.00019980899,0.0019995915,0.00014956752,0.0023370527,0.0016121671,0.00015950388,0.000042298314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006277715,0.000067924266,0.000027896358,0.007536651,0.00014535447,0.0003131351,0.0023250615,0.0000909772,0.000006591208],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026800847,0.00010723549,0.34122533,0.000087975604,0.000028221619,0.000006496397,0.00020443827,0.000005041886,0.40840545,0.00048664835,0.021380834,0.22779435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018310891,0.00030058104,0.014985649,0.000010772356,0.000011406665,0.000017166214,0.00041058374,0.0016550142,0.7313128,0.019296315,0.22977099,0.00039760492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069609196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021824878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32623968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000191294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000882341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470979841","doi":"10.13021/g8xk5r","title":"Report from the \"What Is Open?\" Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Trinity University (Trinity University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Openness to experience; Computer science; Publishing; Scholarship; World Wide Web; Open data; Point (geometry); Data science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.4594353569643454,"score_gpt":0.4438599889798171,"score_spread":0.015575367984528299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470979841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71751934,0.00013538166,0.0069566756,0.015060694,0.0008035126,0.0008443874,0.0019549509,0.00017824148,0.2565468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271251,0.00048051323,0.00012676303,0.00022802468,0.00006880722,1.9458069e-7,0.000046066114,0.000016734608,0.07190782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917585,0.00071954576,0.0005757217,0.0015051472,0.0045025293,0.00093853695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769157,0.015802795,0.0006444086,0.0031411988,0.0024403566,0.0010555519],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049743745,0.00038975512,0.0006505997,0.013278599,0.0017486778,0.0075428537,0.013263231,0.00029521942,0.0013335523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007091227,0.00026428403,0.0005572319,0.07769977,0.0010750961,0.010973671,0.01018935,0.00064810406,0.0013002151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009990179,0.0011057779,0.56143904,0.000003460551,0.00031072163,0.00443015,0.00047284915,0.0000034757077,0.000060173927,0.015374574,0.10493351,0.31086725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002242508,0.00013208376,0.094201006,0.000041937423,0.0000397731,0.00002881594,0.005523958,0.00001928203,0.0001404783,0.0044742725,0.8926966,0.0004592824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001628728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007899011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7877631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075706304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064693356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472338899","doi":"10.7748/nr.22.6.8.e1370","title":"Questioning the efficacy of ‘gold’ open access to published articles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Computer science; Open science; Gold standard (test); Visibility; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Business; MEDLINE; Political science; Medicine; Advertising; Scopus; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8735189213098467,"score_gpt":0.6974667274501697,"score_spread":0.17605219385967696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472338899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8611221,0.00035681407,0.0010955076,0.04356789,0.0003603354,0.0011550334,0.000015328,0.00002380536,0.092303224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658365,0.000010093004,0.00072034885,0.00024647173,0.00009794636,0.000045661785,0.0000017002201,0.000013204758,0.012280895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98477286,0.0010189736,0.0006171906,0.0006545412,0.012190497,0.000745952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808518,0.0074674473,0.00017841518,0.0017665277,0.008487767,0.0012479967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.069332026,0.00010990579,0.00027490052,0.019608911,0.0001803701,0.019819949,0.015017732,0.000079705795,0.0012448176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27232572,0.00005831598,0.00008544182,0.16901393,0.0003383541,0.0028388228,0.0052326787,0.00039065056,0.000823239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018136292,0.00028797105,0.08638811,0.0000021494077,0.000015815453,0.000007990145,0.0007283122,0.00020239448,0.00046681476,0.003467046,0.5960543,0.31219772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015965701,0.00038677035,0.79123956,0.000032214,0.000005325181,0.0000047786993,0.002746852,0.0037243813,0.0049350956,0.035497412,0.15960833,0.00022268799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017716622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011675635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70485145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015248512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008421523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474434229","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010013","title":"Authorship, Patents, Citations, Acknowledgments, Tweets, Reader Counts and the Multifaceted Reward System of Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Reward system; Perception; Social media; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.23261838813011418,"score_gpt":0.4489505553829338,"score_spread":0.21633216725281965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474434229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96926945,0.00018713536,0.00019991535,0.006538673,0.00074153556,0.0009611823,0.000040129227,0.00004454011,0.02201743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991126,0.000027339369,0.00043230026,0.000028380811,0.0000061430756,0.000018738678,3.7117042e-7,0.0000014049926,0.00037273765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497694,0.000010975479,0.0005003086,0.00017127107,0.004105484,0.00023504834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792309,0.00043995067,0.00092513306,0.00014907429,0.019174118,0.000080821126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03747859,0.000056576937,0.00015583233,0.009939525,0.00047431496,0.000603145,0.0014460651,0.00008834534,0.0000012180808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10520616,0.0000299582,0.00002474799,0.058989186,0.0020019696,0.0020233158,0.0005024669,0.0001008495,0.000012344546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005100326,0.00003328645,0.30561462,0.00006847281,0.000020231566,1.078533e-8,0.0046593538,0.0000037778602,0.002219273,0.62752,0.014928027,0.044881932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010935111,0.0006130613,0.27066937,0.00025209266,0.00012581858,0.00002622333,0.14091255,0.08298606,0.08520512,0.23159598,0.17590812,0.000770499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007047364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4483472e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39592403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023268785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033502863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476660944","doi":"10.7202/1036236ar","title":"Le rapport mondial de l’UNESCO sur les sociétés du savoir. État des lieux au Québec, dix ans plus tard","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.37824051360262184,"score_gpt":0.44797636091987086,"score_spread":0.06973584731724902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476660944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8466859,0.03359711,0.02270934,0.063070685,0.003926091,0.0006344394,0.0008594847,0.00013637847,0.028380593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040101,0.030891376,0.0012518135,0.0003186087,0.0014752073,0.00008662706,0.00002070888,0.00006922696,0.06187632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892607,0.000560098,0.0016182645,0.0015134972,0.0052852444,0.0017622425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98088884,0.011165478,0.00073244836,0.0009733581,0.00510492,0.0011349502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007981517,0.00060858246,0.00087382965,0.013011051,0.0009728366,0.0017905608,0.004434319,0.000472861,0.0032858793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044694092,0.0004795468,0.00080062443,0.021602817,0.0018121058,0.0019099594,0.001419788,0.00045571767,0.0010895694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018539913,0.0008063017,0.3476339,0.00014952877,0.0003447047,0.0003190799,0.0013711186,0.00018524127,0.0019417601,0.033078328,0.027756333,0.5862283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001930466,0.00032690592,0.10129913,0.00059012335,0.000068243804,0.00027120012,0.0015014212,0.001688003,0.0008956719,0.00766837,0.8829597,0.0008007368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4273528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53509706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044224295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01852489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477671467","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch010","title":"Open Access Literature Productivity of Library and Information Science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Library science; Bibliometrics; Productivity; Citation; Government (linguistics); Political science; Digital library; Computer science; Business; Economic growth","score_opus":0.21465072662164783,"score_gpt":0.487872062404152,"score_spread":0.2732213357825042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477671467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024488415,0.008009665,0.000019882931,0.0018292294,0.0006325985,0.0009159978,0.00032957198,0.000060720766,0.9857535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050364852,0.92769605,0.002348141,0.0013547904,0.00014554473,0.00005261461,0.00014447347,0.000035554673,0.017857965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990695,0.00005890072,0.0015648074,0.0007799405,0.006318445,0.00058291474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950606,0.0006296783,0.0013958141,0.0009611702,0.0013982229,0.00055450626],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008366583,0.00037030817,0.0006293558,0.042797733,0.00065904873,0.022408469,0.0072153774,0.00021529838,0.00026979472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050798855,0.00027018276,0.00005477625,0.053626996,0.0051924377,0.9751835,0.008849517,0.00052004866,0.000019087482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011897048,0.000010742324,0.0029665611,0.00007580074,0.0000021255883,0.0000013042009,0.0009191199,0.000038741542,0.000010513554,0.9625521,0.00015487615,0.033149183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030171097,0.00020601106,0.005992974,0.00021433279,0.000002947086,0.000026314487,0.0003916665,0.00014739078,0.0012015556,0.017830463,0.9733267,0.00035797647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024970955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.0186053e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045678786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020618315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479570002","doi":"10.4995/carma2016.2015.3140","title":"Validation of a web mining technique to measure innovation in the Canadian nanotechnology-related community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RiuNet (Politechnical University of Valencia)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Measure (data warehouse); Data science; Value (mathematics); Intellectual property; Order (exchange); Web mining; Business; Knowledge management; Data mining; Computer science; World Wide Web; Web page; Statistics; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.3942128199708444,"score_gpt":0.4459838511364967,"score_spread":0.05177103116565229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479570002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861896,0.00001863467,0.0053107166,0.0044364403,0.000034125755,0.00045386227,0.00009069213,0.000026615255,0.003439323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799615,0.000016635244,0.0017514979,0.00005330117,0.0000035139005,0.000001416768,0.0000033501046,0.000003982555,0.00017017919],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954812,0.00073445175,0.00059000595,0.0002859273,0.002535295,0.00037312525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940445,0.0023836764,0.00032217908,0.00088878657,0.0022217107,0.00013917532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0245892,0.000097347416,0.00026799968,0.034859512,0.00026853924,0.00005387436,0.0030719445,0.0003693631,0.000101502075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023522055,0.00006616315,0.000080979284,0.10938686,0.00044317445,0.00030073253,0.00042326076,0.0004221503,0.00002181421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017314428,0.0008289726,0.26662955,0.000042839623,0.00005311595,0.000049467926,0.0032462408,0.00007962886,0.42989686,0.07942868,0.011363349,0.20820813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003091825,0.001843758,0.76006335,0.0005907528,0.000046663892,0.00004535996,0.009633859,0.00047473286,0.100281015,0.09015351,0.03291585,0.00085930584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0279437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044556372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000368066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058844447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98470324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480970959","doi":"10.1111/jan.13090","title":"Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Psychology; MEDLINE; Internet privacy; Medicine; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5333119558243802,"score_gpt":0.658492083473948,"score_spread":0.12518012764956787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480970959","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008686423,0.010230594,0.0014120442,0.008305016,0.96309775,0.0005577749,0.00027192436,0.000012673345,0.0074257953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011717302,0.0051226527,0.007736242,0.00006907537,0.95934826,0.000015749058,0.0000059840922,0.00013229164,0.015852446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.944038,0.0020152817,0.0034011814,0.0012007887,0.047324773,0.0020200082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89337635,0.044480216,0.0032608265,0.0017846161,0.05448486,0.0026131142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12442432,0.0004142592,0.0015103893,0.21105166,0.00044095653,0.007006159,0.008088054,0.0010537464,0.0003661982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40918267,0.0002715886,0.0005325724,0.16499025,0.0003934511,0.0042601503,0.00082744553,0.005875448,0.0001939209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033026078,0.00017247307,0.00022640488,0.0000071729964,0.00001725031,0.00018059548,0.00030227713,0.00010925158,0.00038511018,0.000015452937,0.69889337,0.2993604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001372528,0.00090829056,0.0019642275,0.0032560136,0.000009777971,0.00005047125,0.0022790285,0.000016986207,0.00016063028,0.020525932,0.96911675,0.00033937182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018489713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017258819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29902104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033960396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004251035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483147859","doi":"10.7202/1028147ar","title":"L’impact de la mutation de l’informatique documentaire au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.21536238097568214,"score_gpt":0.5753334675136607,"score_spread":0.3599710865379785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483147859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8342547,0.013607865,0.088484176,0.01558087,0.0011159889,0.0006609215,0.00012767155,0.00014084202,0.046026953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709465,0.007819394,0.0054458324,0.001402239,0.00025367367,0.0000630913,0.00005816521,0.000040425344,0.013970661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98813057,0.0026074008,0.0011952837,0.00064006227,0.006091522,0.0013351912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888361,0.00573739,0.0006204543,0.00059655204,0.0025248155,0.0016846813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037917756,0.0004005767,0.00043212503,0.08786927,0.0004119458,0.035138264,0.0014906394,0.00041283257,0.007824002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01895657,0.00034411694,0.00030163935,0.1588966,0.0005959112,0.03147222,0.0004196474,0.00062463846,0.0011451193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016095542,0.0005595388,0.4678338,0.00006264812,0.00013369297,0.00012452148,0.026490282,0.0034218917,0.0003084726,0.013068169,0.24313147,0.24470456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061181574,0.0025169973,0.42087725,0.0002386611,0.00012920158,0.00087465724,0.02349205,0.042683147,0.00674924,0.1068836,0.38791046,0.00152659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25355536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007929117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24562624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007021314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016874216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483616777","doi":"10.15200/winn.147220.00404","title":"Knowledge Monopolies and Global Academic Publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"The Winnower","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Publishing; Private equity; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Cash; Political science; Business; Library science; Management; Economics; Finance; Law; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.5500932074787537,"score_gpt":0.5878841795718969,"score_spread":0.037790972093143194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483616777","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008268812,0.008605121,0.00004766229,0.0068656043,0.0020004478,0.0002470408,0.97361165,0.000021861983,0.007773714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019043643,0.028962513,0.00014187527,0.00521379,0.010052212,0.00015643648,0.858224,0.00011331952,0.07809226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011034,0.0004474556,0.0007816268,0.00094401307,0.0068786526,0.0008378956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882272,0.006670972,0.0004471916,0.0019849082,0.002236599,0.0004331604],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026772738,0.0003013331,0.00045857384,0.020429343,0.0004378505,0.009322368,0.008573935,0.0006215827,0.0011805602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07078314,0.00013317466,0.00012563562,0.09524647,0.0006686261,0.0015432735,0.0047804234,0.0011163221,0.0023586259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009523197,0.000017454237,0.0007145065,0.0000047412113,0.000016763535,0.000002779828,0.000021627198,8.489786e-8,0.0000022127297,0.00043259453,0.94308436,0.055693332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019477075,0.000030127989,0.0033520393,0.00002632688,0.000012048848,0.000014582218,0.000071849456,0.000015681395,0.00000416777,0.02176071,0.9743161,0.00020159685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018360722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069787646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115387715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018835979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040231264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485726919","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Student Journal Publishing: Events","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9019478745263979,"score_gpt":0.7077693428820072,"score_spread":0.1941785316443907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485726919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030791513,0.016939621,0.0006820813,0.018674336,0.01740107,0.00091565395,0.0002436465,0.000083996405,0.9419804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008281459,0.006248018,0.0023064932,0.0007934777,0.006711537,0.000038347294,0.00008195763,0.00011289187,0.97542584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84109133,0.0041324263,0.0035337089,0.0022499664,0.14600101,0.0029915648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8090513,0.030508347,0.0018931186,0.005003994,0.14790179,0.005641473],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43702525,0.0005488386,0.0012973038,0.31922644,0.0013051898,0.095260814,0.03168467,0.0013214812,0.011154357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45095336,0.00032957073,0.0006600317,0.38305542,0.00048381469,0.0053889425,0.011135916,0.0072346586,0.0070362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001501463,0.0002452102,0.0061046286,0.0000077642435,0.00006886153,0.0001452649,0.00015804553,0.000009282687,0.0000021272965,0.0005420611,0.9165434,0.076158285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059852627,0.00037866045,0.0040912777,0.0000617618,0.0000089349405,0.000094886906,0.0038399147,0.00010353495,0.00000920925,0.06556959,0.92486423,0.00037947088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005760325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101704594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08987187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001945479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007516734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486387022","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.032","title":"Does the Level of Evidence of Paper Presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meetings From 2006‐2010 Correlate With the 5‐Year Publication Rate or the Impact Factor of the Publishing Journal?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medicine; MEDLINE; Publishing; Publication bias; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.3021968020369631,"score_gpt":0.4512465441725902,"score_spread":0.1490497421356271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486387022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454023,0.001988239,0.00064193486,0.05014235,0.0010298396,0.00044469617,0.00029599987,0.0000035368168,0.00005109465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663116,0.0105227325,0.000049314523,0.00019256539,0.000087320266,0.000004248729,0.0000014327306,0.000015700209,0.0024955045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894812,0.0027913935,0.0020837893,0.00027226374,0.0049014236,0.00046994616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94049764,0.04542018,0.006961625,0.0010189285,0.005952672,0.00014893051],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322164,0.00024526502,0.0006565468,0.0015342453,0.0011547308,0.0006949737,0.0022448632,0.00016157496,0.0006586796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035974257,0.000046703335,0.00042872067,0.015941171,0.0021144354,0.0023864838,0.0005005738,0.00095849374,0.0000069238286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072071975,0.00014152713,0.8903541,0.000010878597,0.00068788993,0.0000016819926,0.006471843,0.00040711093,0.009029285,0.000020188734,0.07901055,0.01314425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006858783,0.0003999399,0.98467135,0.00041172563,0.00017352386,0.000028785822,0.0037772767,0.00012652822,0.0053049233,0.00072284363,0.0035784747,0.000118769065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050301047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046741692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09431726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009740386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009297201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97214615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489636575","doi":"10.1007/s11192-016-2094-z","title":"Global neuroscience and mental health research: a bibliometrics case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; University of Toronto","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Mental health; Citation; Public health; Citation analysis; Social network analysis; Psychology; Gerontology; Library science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.8921782491564988,"score_gpt":0.7000762143745934,"score_spread":0.19210203478190535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489636575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792413,0.0024845374,0.0062059658,0.0061749467,0.002243348,0.0014290295,0.0003165502,0.00009791809,0.0018063708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954416,0.0010078377,0.0007887029,0.00036498602,0.00009355159,0.000026213747,8.0478793e-7,0.000020809995,0.0022554782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9439397,0.0021868355,0.0016979671,0.003217576,0.045863487,0.003094433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732373,0.011228657,0.00056411617,0.0023201092,0.009001081,0.0036487875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18153585,0.0003737144,0.0006664534,0.5509861,0.0026286077,0.00893684,0.0049269726,0.00014897849,0.00017546891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22749335,0.00021543005,0.00016181271,0.9261959,0.0018187593,0.0022878665,0.0052224942,0.00043205897,0.0003165629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013015356,0.00064890453,0.53365463,0.0000037106588,0.000004854585,0.0005890521,0.0003562862,0.0000014567478,0.00007900839,0.00048095232,0.03398333,0.43018478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038804335,0.0051875003,0.802931,0.000026841042,0.0000063334764,0.0043282197,0.013583754,0.0017125923,0.000047348218,0.005301657,0.16216376,0.0008305142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008608061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002653798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42935425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011585227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010561439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489736214","doi":"10.5202/rei.v9i2.259","title":"The Impact of Citation Timing: A Framework and Examples","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Institutions","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Receipt; Discounting; Computer science; Citation impact; Stochastic dominance; Data science; Citation analysis; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7240501767185308,"score_gpt":0.6039475764778806,"score_spread":0.12010260024065023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489736214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89078623,0.096428245,0.0025995886,0.0009880628,0.00016695098,0.00026809622,0.00006470928,0.0000023111938,0.008695794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67648244,0.32228604,0.0011475256,0.000033091575,0.000023562603,0.000002582814,8.6333665e-7,0.0000012331819,0.000022632312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896526,0.000045461966,0.00047299472,0.00016343259,0.0002389035,0.00011395022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967163,0.0018220402,0.00026325026,0.00029536342,0.00081017957,0.00009284743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005536908,0.00005173816,0.00020433571,0.0024607363,0.00024919957,0.00022468164,0.00032950184,0.000031213105,0.00005399009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014106424,0.000027521317,0.0000813277,0.00940817,0.00063795986,0.00020352336,0.0001485978,0.000051796942,0.000008242522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063588777,0.000039130042,0.009636492,0.00010597064,0.000035246336,9.360286e-8,0.00010132879,0.000019958174,0.000045735967,0.6329201,0.0030413137,0.35404825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040289207,0.00095371326,0.25769576,0.0016784583,0.00004389489,0.000021541386,0.00028438374,0.015416418,0.00024475006,0.24427435,0.4786867,0.00029713626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007815992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015418182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4756454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000213438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002067076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493514026","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316414958.007","title":"The Johnson scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scheme (mathematics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.519604913071236,"score_gpt":0.4459325329438537,"score_spread":0.07367238012738231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493514026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007778095,0.0023369293,0.00032874598,0.00013107211,0.0007611001,0.0003623758,0.00021550118,0.000056241828,0.9957303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00041554295,0.0008185396,0.00010353657,0.000034093642,0.0001776995,5.06543e-7,0.000008828651,0.000028954211,0.9984123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98907703,0.0001428472,0.00045952658,0.00096480467,0.008709789,0.0006459949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98943144,0.0025755942,0.0004824394,0.0018400339,0.004941156,0.0007293178],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008761432,0.00033759003,0.00046332573,0.01486849,0.00078296795,0.00198526,0.0057447944,0.00044336502,0.000029443738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003965578,0.00023299032,0.000366284,0.0026070212,0.0007225291,0.00022797885,0.0028521386,0.00086467783,0.0004700031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033288703,0.00000407326,0.000006724878,0.0000022807583,0.000028949135,0.0000778766,0.0000051014167,5.3601747e-7,0.0000056021713,0.48707673,0.49436355,0.018395282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033782618,0.00006581163,0.000045798766,0.000016802902,0.000021811524,0.000008471925,0.00004563033,0.00029957233,0.000036402038,0.00037137963,0.99845874,0.00029176573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010756836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004604864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5040952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048712487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006135603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495498057","doi":"10.1017/s0307472200018125","title":"The e-artexte digital repository: Promoting open access in the Canadian contemporary arts research and publishing community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Art Libraries Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Contemporary art; Open access publishing; Library science; Fine art; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; The Internet; Art history; Performance art; Law","score_opus":0.8316852867079174,"score_gpt":0.5949551926557168,"score_spread":0.23673009405220058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495498057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5855476,0.0011212319,0.000062611725,0.06590859,0.0005044592,0.0004921072,0.000010671817,0.0000088994,0.34634382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974682,0.00004958784,0.00003533798,0.00047599792,0.00017147286,0.0000102253325,0.0000029974954,0.0000091146,0.0017771043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98857296,0.0035526666,0.0007644664,0.00033234738,0.005899074,0.0008785127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96257997,0.03229928,0.00037693363,0.0012896976,0.0024890236,0.00096507586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11970089,0.000114464696,0.00020717038,0.013401399,0.01001931,0.484053,0.015442168,0.00009208913,0.000022205088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09750861,0.00005500829,0.00004851342,0.056390084,0.0008831087,0.03162272,0.005379618,0.0027572208,0.000026947539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002496107,0.00006810826,0.5636612,0.0000027437698,0.000010615475,0.000080433965,0.0030147578,0.0000016859677,0.00000689718,0.008839424,0.35129234,0.07299684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037221442,0.00019869437,0.2795304,0.000044416975,6.434222e-7,0.00026829555,0.005484389,0.0006401691,0.000049924714,0.21979213,0.49350995,0.00010877633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148049425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03368522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45243025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094858064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015231224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496996309","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22623","title":"How do you write and present research well? 18—Publish and flourish","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"The arts; Rank (graph theory); Library science; Publication; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3578105967964909,"score_gpt":0.45453337414109946,"score_spread":0.09672277734460855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496996309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95877415,0.0047724033,0.00052537594,0.03457414,0.00031006619,0.00010326382,0.0000136922745,0.000004462425,0.0009224188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795705,0.00009723886,0.00022677303,0.000025362287,0.00033668728,0.0000012683364,8.955966e-8,0.000010020198,0.0013455204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548155,0.000084137544,0.00031154536,0.0002390538,0.0032614586,0.0006222414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926055,0.003428244,0.000094047515,0.00033288114,0.0019491159,0.0015901966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015482949,0.00009671445,0.0002073749,0.013157676,0.00016176084,0.0043300763,0.0013578617,0.00009500356,0.00012711159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031031592,0.0000466511,0.00006173167,0.017370092,0.0003392208,0.00062118575,0.00023225283,0.0005394657,0.000006713182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006590759,0.000039561262,0.039889358,0.000046752968,0.00014878789,0.00056089496,0.00071829534,0.00013276747,0.13270725,0.0054191416,0.34320754,0.47706372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016683459,0.00024505347,0.017348439,0.00021036355,0.00001752721,0.0009066153,0.00031314915,0.0061756577,0.036039475,0.013054439,0.92353606,0.0004848578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031695634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005384049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5803285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016157917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003724521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498021002","doi":"10.7717/peerj.2264","title":"Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Payment; Library science; Business; Scholarly communication; Political science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Advertising; Finance","score_opus":0.8460974344648315,"score_gpt":0.6682455077459878,"score_spread":0.17785192671884376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498021002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82131666,0.00014148654,0.0046949727,0.17175221,0.00007743891,0.0011439886,0.00006231825,0.0000025398463,0.0008083891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400234,0.00002101569,0.00012633235,0.00060587085,0.00003766921,0.00012820304,0.0000022477602,0.0000031027098,0.00507323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964714,0.00017729262,0.00020891128,0.00031599507,0.0024767187,0.0003496883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728864,0.0152347265,0.000105594154,0.00035770496,0.011322323,0.00009328885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024032423,0.000047110054,0.000093403934,0.0050815763,0.000637134,0.0058930106,0.0034043612,0.000025831117,0.000059458074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048601676,0.00001980935,0.000017995619,0.026154542,0.00016809252,0.0016706826,0.00079353875,0.00007558191,0.000005508501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011851446,0.000050564027,0.17293182,0.000015389163,0.000008369895,0.0000010907961,0.0024285198,0.00000488702,0.0009909983,0.017526153,0.424881,0.38104266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001229148,0.00012641493,0.697996,0.000022246433,0.0000045490083,0.0000032506298,0.031293046,0.008869043,0.0029277692,0.039637234,0.2177417,0.0001495477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09459754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3228367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52506423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018027806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010784916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99513894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499478747","doi":"10.11575/prism/29084","title":"Institutional Repositories: Towards the Identification of Critical Success Factors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26274562886254815,"score_gpt":0.43688403868410924,"score_spread":0.1741384098215611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499478747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68678457,0.00018382512,0.2991446,0.00058123475,0.00047288946,0.00009750455,0.0000024909107,0.0000071867253,0.012725676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962955,0.00003252303,0.0022649253,0.0000065902973,0.0000057478337,1.3028117e-7,0.0000016933176,0.0000019274135,0.001390957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512494,0.00021737922,0.00035037394,0.00028549077,0.0038388087,0.00018303732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956214,0.0016685121,0.0002368751,0.00048619078,0.0018498391,0.00013719655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005798222,0.00006496029,0.00017210758,0.0057261563,0.00039886148,0.0001700647,0.0014261075,0.00008117351,0.0003024018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020388668,0.000046875008,0.00012950176,0.02462783,0.0008714232,0.0005313449,0.00022947263,0.00013988663,0.000019585013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009445592,0.00094703824,0.3593617,0.0000686353,0.00009069275,0.000048322243,0.005143183,0.000018801467,0.009687337,0.41713387,0.008415384,0.19899057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040115445,0.00010221681,0.9197429,0.000008611191,0.000028391041,0.000006504755,0.0014844411,0.008486436,0.01620526,0.018473558,0.03489258,0.00016798444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054821017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039337515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005775304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002938941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504832958","doi":"10.71781/695","title":"Émergence et développement de l’oncologie au Québec : collaboration, compétition et défis organisationnels, 1900-2005","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5320393847669203,"score_gpt":0.6044381817413811,"score_spread":0.07239879697446083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504832958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88950604,0.00199114,0.006811821,0.048765987,0.0044717053,0.0025473537,0.0007893143,0.000009212519,0.0451074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8854251,0.002920342,0.046793852,0.0007534361,0.00034577373,0.00021996947,0.002525031,0.00007474599,0.060941745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579705,0.001746306,0.0017263342,0.0016341088,0.0079164095,0.0011798166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98241925,0.0035947168,0.001240575,0.00097185647,0.010685796,0.0010877831],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0444251,0.00052612723,0.0007884632,0.018006569,0.0010168457,0.008576377,0.004914594,0.0006496286,0.023941338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04000468,0.0004714324,0.00014653003,0.10930717,0.00024525763,0.0022734578,0.001223147,0.000688625,0.0068082055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027372647,0.0014249427,0.06665358,0.000039267747,0.00013906506,0.00006363981,0.057151135,0.0021713346,0.003796679,0.0010337719,0.13091272,0.73634017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017515712,0.00079980685,0.116391614,0.00016335057,0.00010180491,0.000016236729,0.054553073,0.006859446,0.007130699,0.006948369,0.8041769,0.0011070886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07814767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5186592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73523307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072019366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06152678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511054836","doi":"10.1642/auk-16-92.1","title":"Trends, costs, benefits, challenges, and prognoses for supplementary materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Auk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Reliability (semiconductor); Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Volume (thermodynamics); Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6499792727979707,"score_gpt":0.5435429268533936,"score_spread":0.10643634594457718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511054836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9117588,0.020012058,0.00018526407,0.06211702,0.00077678164,0.0007687444,0.0020013675,0.00003126073,0.0023487115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98797446,0.008287416,0.00037209876,0.00015806484,0.00017479763,0.00007857897,0.000008697739,0.000010631837,0.0029352491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652433,0.00013579833,0.0003447724,0.00042881956,0.0021389914,0.0004272602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937095,0.0050071175,0.00011584716,0.00053289655,0.00048266954,0.00015197694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011824978,0.00010252689,0.00019070886,0.008470606,0.00020387763,0.0006199666,0.0012297811,0.000044461056,0.0015544156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047142087,0.000040460764,0.00005271226,0.011841602,0.00014382735,0.00021210918,0.00049900485,0.0000337913,0.000078766236],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033283843,0.000029526422,0.0014648563,0.0000024095539,0.000010440241,6.4040665e-7,0.000060867053,3.3718248e-8,0.0022738038,0.009831328,0.033789,0.9525038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014186376,0.0004879521,0.1768958,0.000025046127,0.0000144362475,0.000011411512,0.0005432483,0.00001585675,0.023588803,0.024073934,0.7726995,0.00022540592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006412507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083456995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003810421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030560917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511751023","doi":"10.1186/s40064-016-3165-6","title":"Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on autism spectrum disorders","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SpringerPlus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Scopus; Citation; Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.47844034927722484,"score_gpt":0.5618977958917807,"score_spread":0.08345744661455584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511751023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342546,0.00060315785,0.00069131487,0.014739445,0.0028069513,0.0006004771,0.00012278809,0.000035547066,0.04614574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923403,0.000112445625,0.00013749598,0.000023224551,0.00006275977,0.000018118497,3.467463e-7,0.00001269869,0.010398871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97637284,0.0006556888,0.0007387757,0.0012001301,0.019769229,0.0012633473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901704,0.0054070884,0.00029861036,0.0025276435,0.001157677,0.00043855974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038997848,0.000180673,0.00030836687,0.3939531,0.0008376112,0.0019063562,0.0060659507,0.00014141227,0.0013072971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037076153,0.00008099148,0.00028860653,0.88153934,0.0015915708,0.0004464787,0.0024757297,0.00035857985,0.0022524446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055576613,0.00034292488,0.4506551,0.0000089219875,0.000017472194,0.0000045053243,0.00003886722,0.000012901258,0.0015234798,0.105715014,0.019152952,0.4224723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046210067,0.00021839734,0.8180109,0.000035747904,0.000002111298,0.0000020617338,0.000043689757,0.00017244993,0.00533789,0.119023755,0.05655034,0.00014052476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017326903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012765652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48758623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063922704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960566},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2512942831","doi":"10.4000/communication.6872","title":"Declan FAHY (2015), The New Celebrity Scientists. Out of the Lab and into the Limelight","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Limelight; Humanities; Philosophy; Portrait; Art history; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.44142739647680124,"score_gpt":0.5438260492700419,"score_spread":0.10239865279324062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512942831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7082982,0.020618329,0.0045842705,0.25709265,0.00072192785,0.00064022414,0.000015652595,0.000020673802,0.00800805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932333,0.0023264645,0.00033332373,0.0002042078,0.000025152614,0.0000056712897,5.42423e-7,0.000003882228,0.00386741],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564546,0.0007382367,0.00037009397,0.00024762325,0.0027957833,0.00020280766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98893726,0.006302187,0.00027779702,0.0032589894,0.0011150988,0.00010866187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017072374,0.00007207611,0.0001159069,0.0023202903,0.00080405467,0.00083523185,0.0066339104,0.00005166191,0.00013590523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017081989,0.000022317501,0.0000723289,0.028799936,0.00093536964,0.00027361594,0.0028314248,0.00017116427,0.00010599361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106192965,0.000053656673,0.059283204,0.0000019639504,0.000010796332,8.404608e-8,0.0023178263,7.9096765e-7,0.004872603,0.008200514,0.22458385,0.7006641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030587835,0.000033522057,0.3597296,0.000021215877,0.000007810979,0.000001948025,0.00047054447,0.00040768663,0.0045017838,0.067350164,0.56708884,0.00008100369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036367125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006664284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045755776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001619542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513105786","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2016-205893","title":"Analysis of h-index and other bibliometric markers of productivity and repercussion of a selected sample of worldwide emergency medicine researchers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Sample (material); Index (typography); Productivity; Emergency medicine; Family medicine; World Wide Web; Chromatography","score_opus":0.42254164564654606,"score_gpt":0.5466975217501402,"score_spread":0.12415587610359413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513105786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798153,0.010293062,0.0055045984,0.0018180513,0.000577732,0.0002174596,0.0000601655,0.0000041443773,0.0017094985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766949,0.019341642,0.0001769105,0.0000014165101,0.00012746122,0.0000021386477,0.0000012227791,0.000013623147,0.0036406757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850484,0.0009223851,0.0031870347,0.0006405232,0.009693507,0.0005081591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806989,0.0048860526,0.0024510988,0.00082022784,0.010513085,0.0006306745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049161963,0.00021494833,0.0013061462,0.39925143,0.00011236019,0.000010150306,0.0010868433,0.00011665072,0.03061717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21457341,0.00010252651,0.00021498055,0.66610014,0.0010486315,0.00041792318,0.00034055847,0.00031079704,6.1408565e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003081938,0.00014594189,0.870708,0.00006801377,0.00045739178,5.414011e-7,0.0005206023,0.0000050997282,0.06381589,0.000020358279,0.025015572,0.038934402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010737454,0.001361963,0.98973197,0.0002063266,0.00022865093,0.000008190136,0.0007189006,0.00051640806,0.0018077301,0.0018531556,0.0023789753,0.00011397759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001515959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021202365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2668487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048705053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002029518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790878},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2513984212","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/20/3/25","title":"Debating the future of physics publishing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Nothing; Computer science; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Physics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4903740155259975,"score_gpt":0.5412593030272596,"score_spread":0.05088528750126203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513984212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4079633,0.0033800497,0.29412413,0.010143501,0.0045268037,0.00074882776,0.00006472216,0.000107565946,0.2789411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484295,0.000021098236,0.0014032441,0.0003075873,0.0017343959,0.0000023728005,0.0000028444247,0.00001228003,0.0016732429],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075395,0.00011511558,0.00062604516,0.00041943102,0.0074985567,0.00058687327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98906267,0.0069398684,0.00043395002,0.0008845553,0.0024910395,0.00018789714],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02323148,0.0001281405,0.00024592385,0.006921712,0.00032192442,0.0027754314,0.0028962202,0.00004514072,0.0000923066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006346703,0.00007234995,0.00019614586,0.2066318,0.00016953728,0.0015130491,0.00070038333,0.0004956207,0.00006523668],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071416216,0.00007380769,0.042470057,0.0000033276815,0.000010533746,0.000001685881,0.00025345376,0.00008417916,0.00050555135,0.08817027,0.017897531,0.85052246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006510218,0.00008068816,0.13166517,0.000028294486,0.000017112565,0.0000023302387,0.0029309012,0.009345966,0.037149705,0.596673,0.22100645,0.00044932964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063072766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010273164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85007316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054137556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010328061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514251649","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0161281","title":"The Impact of a Researcher’s Structural Position on Scientific Performance: An Empirical Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Centrality; Structural holes; Position (finance); Social network analysis; Network analysis; Network science; Association (psychology); Bridging (networking); Position paper; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Complex network; Psychology; Social science; Business; Engineering; Social capital; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7800467983055897,"score_gpt":0.6093102400245051,"score_spread":0.17073655828108458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514251649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979971,0.000065103806,0.00008387604,0.0008553805,0.00004037282,0.0001672427,0.00008226105,0.000011127704,0.00069755554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975924,0.000055942095,0.00017541059,0.0000079745505,0.0000444619,0.0000051288334,0.000006001663,0.000005637953,0.0021070447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861415,0.00046962884,0.00048750514,0.00057202054,0.011768363,0.0005609591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99038315,0.0040230094,0.0001860675,0.0012270529,0.003794644,0.00038607416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019461608,0.00010404654,0.00028103235,0.03346838,0.000612607,0.0019308088,0.0020786151,0.00006957705,0.000839112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016750162,0.000039208226,0.00025044085,0.16065682,0.0005976876,0.00065494224,0.00030964633,0.00017645508,0.00022017986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023681881,0.0006527039,0.8848411,0.0000027742599,0.00036570887,0.0000017924444,0.00012004403,0.000048424303,0.04497018,0.00008404836,0.0017787785,0.06689766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022658704,0.0009754317,0.9511167,0.00001168342,0.000031312593,4.178134e-7,0.000043351327,0.033869844,0.011803878,0.001820828,0.000024039078,0.00007597312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006246285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023796676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12718844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023010124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026084395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518333632","doi":"10.5539/jas.v8n10p73","title":"Few Journal Article Organizational Structure Characteristics Affect Article Citation Rate: A Look at Agricultural Economics Articles Using Regression Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Salary; Tobit model; Organizational structure; Variables; Regression analysis; Psychology; Social science; Econometrics; Economics; Management; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.16739799530514615,"score_gpt":0.43434398754183107,"score_spread":0.2669459922366849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518333632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99572307,0.000112391484,0.0016996218,0.0016372278,0.00065951626,0.00010423871,0.000022253074,0.000008091547,0.0000335784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730426,0.0000998278,0.0018865577,0.000056687924,0.00037973525,3.4190245e-7,0.0000013540481,0.00000547343,0.00026576436],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923352,0.00033766785,0.0013562072,0.00047188436,0.0048155217,0.00068353413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98666376,0.0017243341,0.0018528365,0.00027473073,0.008622604,0.0008617505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010658268,0.00021566177,0.0004804875,0.009023629,0.0010647754,0.0039199395,0.0017606722,0.00010102415,0.0007890611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021566207,0.00008299603,0.00031244804,0.08172886,0.00045429883,0.0047483956,0.00044406918,0.00027642833,0.000058328013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037722275,0.000058018573,0.18203738,0.0000012158905,0.000057141857,0.000011192155,0.00021840178,0.0010682307,0.80784124,0.0001230051,0.00077894033,0.0077674906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004769469,0.00013759578,0.9204842,0.00002612248,0.00008424366,0.00044731933,0.0007456914,0.0016684908,0.074603096,0.0010983162,0.00005008063,0.00017792934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051810644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023141123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010458728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038257157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521761739","doi":"10.1021/cen-v080n042.p020","title":"STOCKS HIT HARD IN THIRD QUARTER","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical & Engineering News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social media; Icon; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.37140425260890114,"score_gpt":0.45591150319218277,"score_spread":0.08450725058328162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521761739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847441,0.0007072586,0.0038240873,0.001683879,0.0004357041,0.00015395791,0.000006578289,0.00007727036,0.0083671715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530417,0.000037036625,0.0020406866,0.00010923065,0.000120833945,0.000014514366,0.0000012190267,0.0000120493405,0.0023602345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953811,0.00002310549,0.00051309465,0.0005334077,0.0029510553,0.0005982065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974676,0.0013265392,0.000051362924,0.0005544014,0.00025136382,0.00034873883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021624656,0.0001453422,0.00027610228,0.013714394,0.000027818158,0.00063122134,0.0013319058,0.00014169104,0.00084898184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010906554,0.00011152292,0.00012021335,0.056104,0.000036943784,0.0002731261,0.00024774057,0.00041024495,0.0010423863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016539067,0.00042443277,0.063588426,0.00002323645,0.000020532094,0.00010144429,0.0007403515,0.0021614947,0.31738257,0.0009207652,0.5122098,0.10241046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024767136,0.00019824247,0.055092577,0.000067985864,0.000008773909,0.000038918948,0.00027445515,0.5004556,0.08725774,0.0027984588,0.349946,0.0013845151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003366433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018481201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49829412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011807868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012531195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522670696","doi":"10.29173/cais282","title":"A Transactional Matrix Analysis of National Attendance On International Scientific Meetings","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Transactional leadership; Feature (linguistics); Information flow; Computer science; Data science; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.19083561142939068,"score_gpt":0.44058181757284853,"score_spread":0.24974620614345786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522670696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96652037,0.00055951654,0.00019190849,0.014632549,0.0012781429,0.0004020592,0.001839745,0.000012023546,0.014563693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98355,0.00018438068,0.00096092664,0.00012063542,0.00010573614,0.000027001424,0.00001171447,0.000015182367,0.015024432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674935,0.00008398831,0.0015075302,0.00086495746,0.010118929,0.0006752217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7112514,0.0021393127,0.0019488047,0.0003184535,0.28401616,0.0003259042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098755555,0.00032437526,0.0008315665,0.02384329,0.00030258455,0.013079459,0.006234282,0.00026769296,0.0020515297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12162955,0.00024409193,0.0007770485,0.06638568,0.0021133118,0.012787808,0.0008429973,0.00048568894,0.00005202391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039833126,0.0020816012,0.70210296,0.00037838492,0.0024533237,0.0000018202973,0.01789528,0.00092434726,0.07382565,0.07853386,0.051378462,0.07002599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011223843,0.00056663033,0.76973957,0.00047268777,0.0004407408,0.000020224497,0.0037373009,0.056570835,0.037308067,0.022473047,0.10693767,0.0006108585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008366938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028932252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27549803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025277789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010652831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524030966","doi":"","title":"Individual researchers’ research productivity: a comparative analysis of counting methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Field (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Social science; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Economic growth; Cartography","score_opus":0.9462454699951968,"score_gpt":0.765133054393088,"score_spread":0.18111241560210878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524030966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92950296,0.00014606908,0.0073362314,0.0009907021,0.00025490858,0.000384892,0.00004343239,0.000020504418,0.06132028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479418,0.000010863111,0.047635254,0.000016549104,0.00007093889,0.000019559273,0.0000058681626,0.0000062631475,0.004292909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672552,0.0036202231,0.0010624803,0.0013033797,0.025623316,0.001135402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91741586,0.054828845,0.00041557493,0.0024297244,0.024186233,0.0007237945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33703747,0.00014823578,0.00080069527,0.20203787,0.00048868457,0.002542291,0.0044660885,0.00018146231,0.0035141895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1997773,0.00009720796,0.00030447007,0.60074,0.0013776376,0.0008024812,0.0022777787,0.001715791,0.00015574585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007926493,0.00079580024,0.49284562,0.000008913866,0.0011619992,0.000007751484,0.004446451,0.000090499314,0.1153139,0.024613729,0.018501047,0.342135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036034186,0.00028002085,0.8327232,0.0000032489997,0.0001076349,0.0000024862172,0.006777856,0.032229844,0.058539513,0.015357757,0.05334456,0.00027351655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084740605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008725023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39870214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057173696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005880675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524620595","doi":"10.18438/b8js8p","title":"Measuring Scholarly Productivity of Long Island Educational Institutions: Using Web of Science and Scopus as a Tool","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Web of science; Productivity; Higher education; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; MEDLINE; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.39565448736962916,"score_gpt":0.48952699471622574,"score_spread":0.09387250734659658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524620595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97069275,0.0010060188,0.005626732,0.019787699,0.00019458073,0.00028816133,0.000024112367,0.0000091068305,0.002370858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993859,0.00064701313,0.004696732,0.0006891508,0.000027653823,0.0000052380287,7.1240567e-7,0.0000020659331,0.00007241657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942342,0.00023083274,0.00067326543,0.0002876719,0.004376984,0.00019704003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865028,0.008423415,0.00077752594,0.00043507718,0.0036709376,0.00019023218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018542599,0.00008458646,0.0001514929,0.014646074,0.00036998768,0.0022159102,0.0006651299,0.000046760626,0.00015334699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2705094,0.000054015185,0.000024962093,0.04114027,0.0010285175,0.39933053,0.00041616606,0.00012899273,0.000016115393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070763787,0.0002925583,0.43801156,0.0002445599,0.000023255241,0.0000026529178,0.0003708251,0.000179183,0.04485684,0.2312153,0.0006399744,0.28345567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013401797,0.0005302717,0.80996984,0.0013730639,0.000035017343,0.00016685096,0.0009223947,0.010574862,0.12140722,0.0037345255,0.049520727,0.00042502748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020469222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.3197919e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39711463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037181806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053673293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524647697","doi":"10.29173/cais283","title":"A Concise Review On The Role Of Author Self-Citations In Information Science, Bibliometrics And Science Policy","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2356972037868541,"score_gpt":0.46773803466837877,"score_spread":0.23204083088152466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524647697","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33887187,0.6049777,0.000017501472,0.0107355,0.0006075855,0.0057707946,0.00107495,0.00003255823,0.037911523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40064725,0.59823364,0.0005153039,0.0002503284,0.000039312163,0.0001065605,0.0000021753856,0.000014523087,0.0001909075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98290175,0.00019434703,0.0029515317,0.000926067,0.01173099,0.0012953324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3312202,0.013807357,0.011537852,0.0020555947,0.6397456,0.0016333862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045850568,0.00058435526,0.0018978583,0.16021524,0.00072537456,0.018923394,0.013652999,0.00033548966,0.00010551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6337134,0.00032973647,0.0004230326,0.5368283,0.0072029843,0.03599976,0.0043288944,0.0010183959,0.000045124245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019599524,0.00033953093,0.02075864,0.007663431,0.000049600447,3.6486446e-7,0.008093997,0.0000016779923,0.00060219434,0.1369368,0.0022256179,0.8233085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005572544,0.0009402238,0.056154244,0.02072025,0.00024024163,0.000054337535,0.005369681,0.002544943,0.0025720536,0.0142700635,0.89579695,0.0007797597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076415617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047418102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005355266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009922325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999155},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2525288835","doi":"10.3917/rfs.573.0407","title":"Practices and Rhetoric of the Internationalization of Science","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Française de Sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.571424494086081,"score_gpt":0.5687829082360797,"score_spread":0.0026415858500012934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525288835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95279396,0.02047947,0.004636317,0.017041456,0.002040889,0.000200881,0.00007051699,0.000005770037,0.002730737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871575,0.007983775,0.0007399906,0.000034917295,0.000092363225,0.0000038402577,2.0417406e-7,0.000004580994,0.003982824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579054,0.000375693,0.00055577775,0.0004284583,0.0024681555,0.00038135028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856898,0.009184564,0.001281476,0.0005223974,0.0031755236,0.00014623758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018429212,0.00009451814,0.00024066019,0.006813964,0.0002361628,0.00014828269,0.0021636835,0.00016721121,0.00025765286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1774133,0.00004877423,0.000113438975,0.04605863,0.005561591,0.00076268776,0.00090685964,0.0001513746,0.000022944525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016109454,0.00012348301,0.68483156,0.00007419283,0.00001847976,0.0000016636221,0.0011473255,0.000018574752,0.03459306,0.047796812,0.0015127978,0.22986591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005855772,0.0002409432,0.8834224,0.00035251546,0.000030158884,0.00001953678,0.0007233701,0.0026967712,0.02196882,0.044291336,0.045493163,0.00017544682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016651479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009446468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22969046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019096563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011744595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525623129","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0162709","title":"How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8995300042247711,"score_gpt":0.5926924146211023,"score_spread":0.3068375896036688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525623129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012454,0.00017220191,0.00017214142,0.09553387,0.000028027169,0.00044762404,0.000070838374,0.00001592361,0.0023139755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676216,0.000057000518,0.00012867835,0.000047112204,0.0002116249,0.000023281747,6.049618e-7,0.000010862927,0.03189922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98530143,0.00086458906,0.00027699285,0.0007988181,0.012088069,0.0006701254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455285,0.049692925,0.00013335339,0.0015842178,0.002644495,0.00041648513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040551305,0.00012342083,0.00024908863,0.021444907,0.00065198797,0.002741328,0.0015576053,0.00010499403,0.00027643255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20161948,0.000051155464,0.00007602801,0.07734542,0.00045370567,0.0007223407,0.0007135158,0.00050263625,0.00075440755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019687543,0.00023308073,0.95159495,0.0000042973165,0.000029764255,0.0000018495743,0.00007921515,1.9106977e-8,0.0023221264,0.0033054454,0.020444173,0.021965364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017594086,0.00028271572,0.9434266,0.000030663286,0.0000057585294,5.661464e-7,0.0000656058,0.000033099466,0.008055126,0.046619557,0.0012139874,0.000090377944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034826997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030688225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16106817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015375692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012209103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526820601","doi":"10.5860/crl.78.6.824","title":"Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Perception; Public relations; Open access publishing; Open science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.794470165071975,"score_gpt":0.6667468592542378,"score_spread":0.12772330581773716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526820601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741968,0.004573913,0.000059528862,0.006088192,0.0007250228,0.001261741,0.00020295406,0.00003500212,0.012856838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663044,0.00083153846,0.0013276897,0.00004557196,0.00026217147,0.000084835396,0.000005969092,0.000035814355,0.0107759535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832391,0.0011975684,0.00107253,0.0014520208,0.011476555,0.0015621867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98560286,0.006505045,0.00067252724,0.0024984775,0.0033824884,0.0013386277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.065295815,0.00028097248,0.0007195956,0.0358034,0.0034455482,0.06271684,0.027374145,0.0004001156,0.0005266721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09229857,0.00021398225,0.00013103183,0.062236108,0.0036084363,0.030216789,0.0362977,0.0025665832,0.00005007373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011950688,0.00008201524,0.9113409,0.000030842308,0.000022598924,0.000070210874,0.0003121081,0.0000010184405,0.0006347987,0.02414477,0.03605137,0.027189884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007678842,0.00016222273,0.9530136,0.00012330992,0.0000075514727,0.000007839567,0.001649142,0.00043402592,0.002399075,0.020787872,0.020374674,0.0002728323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007476013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014687536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041672695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013362113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017887193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527210626","doi":"","title":"Improving addiction patients’ quality of life through exercise","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation impact; Medicine; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7552906579809577,"score_gpt":0.6134657219853138,"score_spread":0.14182493599564394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527210626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836027,0.0067023938,0.0048332876,0.00083641155,0.0014255557,0.000421382,0.000046384168,0.000014201048,0.0021176988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304354,0.0046633882,0.0012961115,0.000069512265,0.00037369842,0.000007790882,0.000003679841,0.000017868864,0.00052439264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718956,0.0018554352,0.0021298816,0.0004046911,0.023094917,0.00061947363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95551,0.0042754323,0.0017316643,0.0007415633,0.036733076,0.001008251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0863117,0.00015462599,0.0006139218,0.027996372,0.0002917537,0.0009202686,0.0020158614,0.0001819466,0.00075552147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067684166,0.000100790145,0.0003490291,0.06851758,0.00036499632,0.0020341435,0.0003184647,0.00097575993,0.00008810043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028465416,0.0012813169,0.0971698,0.0000067901537,0.00010848473,0.0000054270954,0.0010497351,0.00015580334,0.0033242037,0.0002115779,0.1813507,0.7124896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01523592,0.009974307,0.61843634,0.0001359661,0.000020576415,0.000012835882,0.0067240368,0.0025169288,0.010586503,0.017460804,0.3183784,0.0005173601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004665447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007950453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7119723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035836152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014149641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527456359","doi":"10.1111/jan.13169","title":"Countries publishing in <i>JAN</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Impact factor; Prestige; Library science; Citation; Political science; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.24110062339281096,"score_gpt":0.5713645331885939,"score_spread":0.33026390979578296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527456359","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017455675,0.007983447,0.0022736366,0.0032600714,0.9788016,0.00013276917,0.00009420367,0.000008226994,0.005700449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064128553,0.0051364745,0.0035535565,0.00008110648,0.9816888,0.0000022977715,0.0000054050574,0.00005970968,0.0030597684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.969684,0.00038336747,0.002498708,0.00062486395,0.025902238,0.0009068179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94373286,0.032969255,0.0038239895,0.00082538306,0.018005919,0.0006425932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041325763,0.00029869663,0.0011194242,0.09141995,0.00016919865,0.008457717,0.0047345916,0.0007600162,0.00015941994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28132373,0.0001823835,0.00036368569,0.07250523,0.00028604278,0.0073077227,0.0002690758,0.0023948175,0.00005347981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015180062,0.000057193964,0.00023447016,0.000006690114,0.000008031176,0.00008474151,0.00011332229,0.00004845522,0.000095804884,0.000044697117,0.73333603,0.26581874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013443695,0.00025333525,0.00030086713,0.0012545706,0.000009171141,0.000020922462,0.00051151664,0.00001953801,0.00017270057,0.019314356,0.9765692,0.0002294604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071346444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008929726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015166831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019484387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528776092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.1","title":"Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Scholars' Language Choices in International Scholarly Publishing: A Ten-Year Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Citation index; Social science; Humanities; Sociology; Citation; Linguistics; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.4310339561278515,"score_gpt":0.504655204141219,"score_spread":0.0736212480133675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528776092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646768,0.0019976036,0.00023902013,0.02215494,0.001486239,0.00012045561,0.0001084888,0.000019817073,0.00919664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950694,0.00024818166,0.0013125379,0.0009964313,0.00089392107,0.0000027692852,0.0000039949687,0.000020987169,0.0014518162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770055,0.0014852113,0.001964551,0.0008500816,0.017807703,0.00088696915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684187,0.00962424,0.0018219021,0.0004437111,0.019291831,0.00039962024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16633902,0.00028061253,0.00062236143,0.06421907,0.00084140844,0.506014,0.009120988,0.00040499037,0.00038742519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48894697,0.00015868056,0.00021884944,0.055454668,0.0005564796,0.46947542,0.0020817784,0.0029866742,0.00003028077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007057538,0.00010869359,0.9456507,0.0000041010476,0.00003358729,0.000048954393,0.0010118275,0.0000012616624,0.0015516254,0.0016249185,0.008441382,0.04145236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019469458,0.00016717004,0.97144026,0.000078136894,0.0000046651935,0.000069148045,0.0039079795,0.000037904836,0.000058515277,0.006089494,0.015962953,0.00023682194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080110657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005742569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32260793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004244122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008183806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528867665","doi":"10.3138/9781442678897","title":"Public Science, Private Interests: Culture and Commerce in Canada's Networks of Centres of Excellence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Public administration; Political science; Business; Public relations; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17270837357685973,"score_gpt":0.3588150077710156,"score_spread":0.18610663419415588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528867665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025256066,0.000087675624,0.00034660278,0.000110632194,0.00030270207,0.00064436503,0.0002266599,0.000013290014,0.97301203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84446186,0.12973809,0.00044235634,0.00005763543,0.00007601402,0.0000014233284,0.000044987188,0.000037770922,0.025139863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155974,0.00023457044,0.00080375,0.001064576,0.0055190385,0.0008183327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360263,0.0014494498,0.00090143085,0.0009371237,0.00280032,0.0003090199],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004108481,0.00032934183,0.0008033046,0.31619918,0.00017664241,0.00043464187,0.004712494,0.000262452,0.000048430706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032205747,0.0002748582,0.0001345685,0.31392038,0.0011795524,0.0007498733,0.0025919217,0.0006953442,0.000001796763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043941604,0.0011871103,0.3963217,0.00063923356,0.0002396155,0.0010657624,0.003253543,0.0010781158,0.000043305445,0.048958905,0.13806581,0.40870747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005237407,0.000108504464,0.0074087284,0.00015356761,0.000014331954,0.000003937366,0.000386625,0.0023410674,0.000034785768,0.000029714445,0.988713,0.0002819527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8833396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9088486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94787216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018034881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011972337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529285477","doi":"10.29173/cais913","title":"Acknowledgment Research Genealogy for Today’s Quantified Academia","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Library science; Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.5034044582700364,"score_gpt":0.5181975583030186,"score_spread":0.014793100032982176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529285477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197927,0.0049226442,0.00063310657,0.05795738,0.0019882342,0.0015556003,0.0013417919,0.000024961444,0.011783566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558989,0.0033647332,0.001146259,0.00015694421,0.0004377781,0.000112202055,0.000002097177,0.000042567688,0.03883851],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718935,0.00028283548,0.0018023958,0.0013198239,0.007289821,0.002115762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46694803,0.013823899,0.0020087452,0.0010306917,0.5150719,0.0011167107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03607231,0.00045332636,0.0010776093,0.014104557,0.0005848634,0.010383656,0.010996817,0.0010992762,0.00052401406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49514934,0.00026915813,0.00057855656,0.04027432,0.0033058699,0.012040705,0.0044026067,0.0011845342,0.00012859811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067689025,0.0006558077,0.14042619,0.00063649256,0.00019928419,0.000002478082,0.010549293,0.0000017801987,0.11258037,0.12534036,0.21581525,0.39311582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015494884,0.0013327852,0.052852333,0.00074837444,0.00006274317,0.000020937505,0.0027590601,0.000672094,0.13188654,0.067469686,0.7401947,0.0004512787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003209955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038344457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52437943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045067622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021741015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531842628","doi":"10.1186/s41073-016-0022-7","title":"Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of British Columbia; Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Community; Publishing; Functional ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Rhetorical question; Biology; Habitat; Political science; Ecosystem; Law","score_opus":0.9221730707033521,"score_gpt":0.7096993867356763,"score_spread":0.21247368396767574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531842628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005110418,0.34053174,0.0014475455,0.65045696,0.00015405026,0.002460596,0.003103672,0.000009509171,0.0013248941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001295789,0.90540236,0.004976423,0.020568965,0.00029994838,0.00027006606,0.00009847949,0.000030421204,0.06705754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717272,0.0017873342,0.0015532733,0.0019223058,0.021658812,0.0013510691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6633531,0.13572043,0.0015033262,0.011049611,0.18310234,0.005271216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22905879,0.00031132856,0.0014028784,0.008199491,0.0005751274,0.0018189815,0.0058880993,0.00020723142,0.009945498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6551285,0.00014581611,0.00023535629,0.04588677,0.0003807069,0.0010729847,0.002725561,0.001550264,0.0017139163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022627122,0.000071562594,0.0042054285,0.00096979976,0.000036505924,0.000012503712,0.000059838872,1.21300054e-8,0.000024506942,0.00005459077,0.82216835,0.17237426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042553712,0.00042062256,0.0031072118,0.019074518,0.000047578,0.000028095124,0.00013084522,0.00005704773,0.000027551963,0.0020120258,0.97442335,0.00024563877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031066744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045767368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.629888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018788362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092774985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994905},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2531929339","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of National Cancer Institute of Canada-Supported Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Regional science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8147265308711052,"score_gpt":0.6424995894648025,"score_spread":0.1722269414063028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531929339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555601,0.0006097442,0.0006842964,0.00047506628,0.00031090988,0.00013500897,0.00023064826,0.0000056254175,0.04198859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712754,0.00041506873,0.00041768298,0.00004824426,0.000028897386,0.000009207771,0.0000090879785,0.00000459439,0.011939686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96133906,0.00022343743,0.0011714073,0.00056011404,0.036099456,0.00060653465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96204656,0.0054780645,0.00035741966,0.0006236568,0.031078432,0.00041584464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029366605,0.000102970116,0.00057163043,0.91774285,0.00026020722,0.00014795912,0.002351923,0.00008777718,0.005309349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06060376,0.0000708344,0.00021306243,0.9878314,0.00057102705,0.0004927162,0.0005276447,0.0002346808,0.000013614221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018841354,0.00017199847,0.7859941,0.0000048354477,0.00036184196,0.000014312981,0.00006151029,0.0017614482,0.0010856057,0.0010318095,0.19380817,0.015685517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020041878,0.000048092134,0.9632586,0.0000020093191,0.000016782504,0.0000016923734,0.00008173731,0.009857437,0.0038548245,0.0005599638,0.022031872,0.00008653654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5247912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27629018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.248501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035067202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008179093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947137},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2531933588","doi":"10.5830/cvja-2015-082","title":"Patterns of international collaboration in cardiovascular research in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cardiovascular journal of South Africa/Cardiovascular journal of Southern Africa","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Innovates","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.3708793697513478,"score_gpt":0.47177820280118843,"score_spread":0.10089883304984065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531933588","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010501656,0.9838435,0.009027762,0.0000683546,0.0026131282,0.001461002,0.00072695286,0.000013191238,0.0011959418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049198795,0.9478315,0.0006627871,0.0000029573084,0.001864256,0.000048613507,0.0000083761415,0.00023727925,0.00014539891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9263243,0.014230491,0.010769741,0.0019371376,0.04439173,0.002346605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95819706,0.005763424,0.006105885,0.004748635,0.023770144,0.0014148488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22347154,0.0014706139,0.01432616,0.107199036,0.0002915628,0.0017831691,0.011942532,0.0015879695,0.00017957987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03472701,0.000986336,0.034269683,0.0927591,0.00067375315,0.0016784277,0.0017665068,0.005384929,0.0003162339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031125383,0.0006722066,0.001398295,0.0016134103,0.03588621,0.005617661,0.0049925162,0.003780322,0.000013867341,0.000018450937,0.0017762231,0.9439196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046853293,0.00044568392,0.00021351954,0.010725621,0.0029572996,0.0012611455,0.0054542786,0.000023792889,0.000019157387,0.00061437447,0.97263587,0.000963938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032071166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032021694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97085965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025277967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004163206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537154768","doi":"10.7202/1036241ar","title":"Aperçu de la pratique de la science ouverte dans les universités francophones au Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Globe Revue internationale d’études québécoises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.1200168256215672,"score_gpt":0.43332597556829794,"score_spread":0.31330914994673076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537154768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330533,0.004214021,0.028375205,0.014353626,0.0015960422,0.00026732497,0.0002563009,0.00006907763,0.11781512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518881,0.0059486604,0.0032170766,0.00023543813,0.0004377313,0.000022067412,0.0000019491447,0.00002940865,0.038219567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114716,0.0012820273,0.0007543838,0.0011454899,0.004441204,0.0012297059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713833,0.023705943,0.00043295074,0.00077783526,0.0028001715,0.0008998358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017391965,0.00036879463,0.00042470143,0.014944592,0.00096337363,0.0020037037,0.0053557632,0.0004043437,0.0014385867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052185018,0.00028259988,0.0003168224,0.0346965,0.004558492,0.0017450448,0.0013070157,0.0005371703,0.0004941432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057488007,0.0005751915,0.44918448,0.000056279267,0.000096154836,0.0002763974,0.0034300883,0.00024268075,0.023481382,0.09776079,0.0038999817,0.4209391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007643871,0.00017099374,0.30224004,0.00048462185,0.00003085788,0.0004075804,0.002718157,0.0021572865,0.0047314772,0.0037629148,0.6820655,0.00046621484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4343435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3384304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6781655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083928015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022347108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537615093","doi":"10.1080/03009734.2016.1238426","title":"Scholarly publishing threatened?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Generosity; Cheating; Medicine; Internet privacy; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.7333044164161997,"score_gpt":0.6030590586352609,"score_spread":0.13024535778093882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537615093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6980564,0.0030087393,0.02752447,0.255804,0.0026849632,0.0000700492,0.000005277635,0.000014520716,0.0128315715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952266,0.0011488196,0.0014812131,0.0006800051,0.0005953899,6.5057577e-7,3.877331e-8,0.0000045940938,0.00086265325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9457216,0.0004570945,0.0012815946,0.00044788016,0.05140261,0.0006891954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97610646,0.014113919,0.0010489994,0.00045456245,0.006065253,0.0022107912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17912863,0.00012015755,0.00036892376,0.0286448,0.00039067597,0.01845695,0.010994454,0.00022280491,0.0050791088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4018729,0.00004610716,0.0002257708,0.08555201,0.001180071,0.0168997,0.0009682009,0.0006077917,0.00022609266],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010018046,0.00006927943,0.14082067,8.659604e-7,0.000009343757,0.00011181292,0.000052882955,0.0000015532934,0.00044516462,0.013598635,0.034267038,0.81061274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035291545,0.0022611597,0.19380967,0.00042842855,0.000015563668,0.0012340624,0.0013924713,0.0010290141,0.0028977478,0.42222798,0.3706607,0.0005140591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003723744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011029597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81009865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009761657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001482349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543203851","doi":"","title":"Women and science in russia: A historical bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Research centre; Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.42285964240869117,"score_gpt":0.5329377129554134,"score_spread":0.1100780705467222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543203851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616525,0.0003123163,0.010292439,0.00073052774,0.00020270901,0.00008474766,0.0000012887563,0.000020183188,0.026703289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938208,0.00011350607,0.0014213688,0.0001310856,0.000025979885,0.00001077122,1.9103632e-7,0.0000040871364,0.0044722008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859691,0.00019170488,0.00069496024,0.0011027703,0.011085072,0.0009563882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138105,0.0050191646,0.00015587291,0.0008966763,0.0015689019,0.0009783206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06743452,0.00012671146,0.00047623593,0.9465463,0.00024944218,0.0031447494,0.0024625058,0.000078976664,0.00083959417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07924111,0.00008080276,0.000092499526,0.98991305,0.00035909796,0.00096035,0.0010454031,0.00021075828,0.00014527241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004802172,0.00007259264,0.72668207,9.213075e-7,0.0000066110474,0.0000027956016,0.000090227855,0.000019256615,0.00016426004,0.0015008581,0.0011026276,0.270353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025186833,0.000112411646,0.9433445,4.942926e-7,0.000004478574,0.000001818927,0.00009033264,0.029775554,0.000038533544,0.007236635,0.019019123,0.00012425186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040900346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055515662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27022874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009720968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018815049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555090082","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4305","title":"Facteur d’impact","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University; Princeton University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Wayne State University; State University of New York; Stanford Bio-X; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.28085876525509357,"score_gpt":0.4106691854325936,"score_spread":0.12981042017750005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555090082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021445284,0.02780489,0.002010219,0.0007731056,0.00062478724,0.0006196931,0.00084455556,0.00010507404,0.9457724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16079415,0.003575959,0.0009401639,0.00014047757,0.0002623816,0.000005430397,0.000036749825,0.00010281417,0.83414185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866985,0.00041153864,0.00088613934,0.0015361838,0.008437902,0.0020297463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98715955,0.003525523,0.0007409497,0.0017172239,0.0037984669,0.0030582966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076337564,0.0008820948,0.0011167057,0.028853396,0.0009186686,0.001994394,0.005155809,0.0011964212,0.040738158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005142716,0.00076762435,0.0009818826,0.007016404,0.00080779404,0.0005141764,0.0049312706,0.0013748362,0.004250072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008508522,0.00017155829,0.02551146,0.00008195524,0.00066202466,0.0038421038,0.0022540893,0.0013571818,0.0014281335,0.039203417,0.32102183,0.6036154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012778452,0.0006069505,0.02156728,0.000105290186,0.0002040072,0.0003455585,0.00029067308,0.0051133065,0.00046468314,0.04996006,0.91911465,0.0009496751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089285225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001413553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6026657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046495534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012716219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559104316","doi":"10.1177/0959354316681689","title":"For a Virtual Wayzgoose: A Farewell Editorial on the Mutations of Theory and Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Debt; Reflection (computer programming); Closing (real estate); Sociology; Introspection; Epistemology; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.514911939698338,"score_gpt":0.6211698452053035,"score_spread":0.10625790550696546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559104316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84849286,0.00067860057,0.1025286,0.01194987,0.023614697,0.00068483676,0.00026849794,0.000022186094,0.011759853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933694,0.00013860107,0.0000854735,0.0006339445,0.0026715912,0.000030983276,4.825917e-7,0.000010420508,0.003059078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949224,0.0016070812,0.00054484094,0.00045381248,0.0020930506,0.00037882195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9348243,0.062806375,0.00027961028,0.0006372381,0.001301447,0.00015103353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.060628846,0.000109133965,0.0002468754,0.010265539,0.00022839173,0.00020810096,0.0013672872,0.00013930337,0.0015635076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077587955,0.00004538537,0.0001262522,0.0152623495,0.00078995904,0.00015199743,0.00015676887,0.00016605256,0.00015203583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011329094,0.00013661258,0.00066562346,0.0000010204194,0.000034025423,0.0000012143947,0.0003101963,9.2648986e-7,0.011546719,0.6099942,0.1061011,0.27007547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009469567,0.00077191676,0.0075983494,0.000008915363,0.000006712918,0.0000074645745,0.00041157054,0.0000059573204,0.0008412107,0.9054514,0.083875604,0.00007393994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010067185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.476101e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2954572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017712644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006779142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560530650","doi":"10.1002/ase.1671","title":"Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anatomical Sciences Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Transparency (behavior); Diligence; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Work (physics); Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5069851338706,"score_gpt":0.5885490069478322,"score_spread":0.08156387307723223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560530650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390382,0.000784367,0.0022026727,0.024045862,0.0017995316,0.00018420226,0.000014343457,0.000048135877,0.031882696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928892,0.00020049859,0.00060129474,0.0007523354,0.00030047228,0.000017454766,0.0000012746972,0.000005284753,0.005232139],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984236,0.00029176913,0.0006291723,0.0009588288,0.0076117893,0.0006660894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917266,0.005139319,0.00026466622,0.00052325724,0.0017081298,0.000638058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024139907,0.00012084314,0.00017373785,0.01992836,0.00047446945,0.0040552625,0.0044378014,0.00018962393,0.001532155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08032902,0.00006035591,0.00009465085,0.08502303,0.000730121,0.005866197,0.0005533784,0.0002664793,0.0011549052],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003825648,0.00005945219,0.15711814,8.5093774e-7,0.0000018383176,2.9852555e-7,0.0000602936,7.2630695e-7,0.0023445447,0.029640906,0.1371549,0.6736142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036313964,0.00014060726,0.25530142,0.000051506297,0.00000406185,0.000011070781,0.001202971,0.001043598,0.0051587992,0.28235316,0.45396665,0.00040302018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010799096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014351916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67321116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027037287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016525637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563712121","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/18/10/19","title":"Tiny department tops research rankings","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TOPS; Computer science; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.8324245437436233,"score_gpt":0.6684415546389956,"score_spread":0.16398298910462772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563712121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47471467,0.0015012213,0.0062312554,0.01660838,0.0009456256,0.0008992519,0.000048065023,0.00012735695,0.4989242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96107167,0.000052736494,0.0017701517,0.00035523757,0.00088737946,0.00003181522,0.0000046519876,0.000016208645,0.035810143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98307854,0.00035240003,0.00055773166,0.0008146639,0.014144554,0.0010521027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031115,0.005004978,0.00012229873,0.0010772271,0.0030470572,0.00043727274],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026386097,0.00014825317,0.000272538,0.02671014,0.00051008613,0.0024249477,0.0026079118,0.000045940807,0.0014108968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006333653,0.00010796535,0.00017072304,0.21502888,0.00022792562,0.0006897072,0.0010503393,0.000559692,0.0060925675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020470821,0.00031081054,0.020366311,0.0000023507512,0.000013022399,0.000007617218,0.00016081402,0.00012129879,0.00053050613,0.034855247,0.24792336,0.6956882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037280258,0.000058816415,0.013361368,0.000006454243,0.0000025497427,0.0000013166377,0.00006127872,0.0041817646,0.008209265,0.091230765,0.882333,0.00018065804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004927714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097309676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6955075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024716192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017521964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564107690","doi":"10.29173/cais265","title":"The Effects of Electronic Publication on Social Science Researchers in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Commodity; Publishing; Revenue; Electronic publishing; Public relations; Information Dissemination; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet; Accounting","score_opus":0.20195332987001907,"score_gpt":0.42728402122148335,"score_spread":0.22533069135146427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564107690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840272,0.00014193432,0.0000025185245,0.005414285,0.00011862084,0.00049996073,0.000017372424,0.000004207544,0.009773894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991592,0.00013196086,0.000018802315,0.00009141308,0.000023388375,0.000040717096,3.5328478e-7,0.0000071644986,0.0005270053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99099433,0.00008566661,0.00071501994,0.0004410272,0.0068653678,0.00089855876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62866193,0.009204494,0.0021175297,0.0008227241,0.35868156,0.0005117414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012938844,0.00014626584,0.00033943486,0.0063069398,0.0003451763,0.007360261,0.007543828,0.00007806514,0.00003090652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42967373,0.00008203632,0.00009905228,0.049548633,0.001261496,0.0067727007,0.0011649776,0.00046139478,0.0000051613583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014651185,0.00024016775,0.60322034,0.00013979702,0.000040241594,5.7831767e-7,0.006898931,0.00000342028,0.061079234,0.06257633,0.035764158,0.22989029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035984194,0.00028857918,0.91504484,0.00005091464,0.000004691093,0.0000014954851,0.0028541004,0.00096038135,0.056905642,0.01251227,0.010885932,0.00013129327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10957203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008889644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41673487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005883244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050279545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564123428","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v9i4.347","title":"Upcoming IJTMB Initiatives from the Interim Executive Editor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Massage Therapy Foundation","keywords":"Interim; Audience measurement; Honor; Privilege (computing); Public relations; Political science; Executive director; Management; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.45889148631759114,"score_gpt":0.6574437069409884,"score_spread":0.19855222062339728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564123428","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021939553,0.008901264,0.0048273937,0.059036847,0.907756,0.00050459575,0.00036319555,0.000014222009,0.018377112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019255986,0.012264664,0.0012938489,0.0009182773,0.9541455,0.00006410071,0.00004867228,0.00007669953,0.011932248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93946487,0.00784067,0.0025223223,0.0010517506,0.048185978,0.0009343941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43862453,0.4175714,0.00695756,0.0023338704,0.13351712,0.000995517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10100649,0.00046828357,0.00078666606,0.022948679,0.0006601051,0.010088055,0.015075765,0.0007562567,0.003152907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5014471,0.00026182577,0.00061582896,0.02140409,0.00083302095,0.0046398607,0.0020338183,0.005704159,0.00066562416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010994877,0.0006253878,0.0005001813,0.000003387775,0.00077593356,0.00004990478,0.0011330778,0.0000014531705,0.00016546574,0.0005278389,0.8841059,0.11101199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067843206,0.00033179633,0.0010332294,0.00043663912,0.00006824927,0.00002661349,0.007985024,0.000024832503,0.0001125392,0.0217208,0.967311,0.00027083344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043284855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023567347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50084037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019870067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012453092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564862754","doi":"","title":"Applying social network analysis to examine the shared nature of athlete leadership within a competitive hockey team: A longitudinal case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shared leadership; Construct (python library); Psychology; Longitudinal study; Social network analysis; Task (project management); Social network (sociolinguistics); Team sport; Social psychology; Leadership development; Applied psychology; Leadership style; Public relations; Management; Social capital; Athletes; Political science; Computer science; Social media","score_opus":0.1950098271565918,"score_gpt":0.40931646733998517,"score_spread":0.21430664018339338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564862754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99624157,0.0008197157,0.00023271066,0.00033201036,0.00046399166,0.0009417633,0.00002489692,0.000008926856,0.0009344405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975401,0.00010436073,0.00031623867,0.00009204423,0.00042679132,0.00003077077,0.0000013261495,0.000019029272,0.0014692997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893435,0.0001950386,0.0025020794,0.0007394467,0.0065474454,0.0006724904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080586,0.001386817,0.0027490463,0.0006716696,0.003787963,0.00059866055],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015500503,0.00034596393,0.001237242,0.012472018,0.00068419357,0.0010663386,0.001518113,0.0002364789,0.000066174944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016661357,0.00017243494,0.00048338604,0.03414172,0.00022507168,0.00065896654,0.00042880283,0.00076838507,0.0000043851846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010748731,0.0010255453,0.96469486,0.000032148997,0.00144251,0.0039198603,0.0031095515,0.00046002754,0.0035945673,0.0001477517,0.0057269144,0.0147713935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014192259,0.0008320045,0.9707478,0.0001633855,0.00059043895,0.00027025965,0.02353814,0.000061238425,0.0009932148,0.00019653667,0.0008904561,0.00029729263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035053754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003106617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0216697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016073475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022955523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565597050","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1702121114","title":"The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Prestige; Diversity (politics); Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.6174522038660023,"score_gpt":0.5787121461691838,"score_spread":0.03874005769681854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565597050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661593,0.00013844846,0.0000010556475,0.020304682,0.00013298671,0.00027261997,0.000029013574,0.000002840259,0.012959053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979573,0.000024156167,0.00020379756,0.000042681353,0.0000766744,0.0000067757896,1.5327526e-8,0.000002380983,0.0016862025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612523,0.00005194581,0.00062998297,0.000465849,0.012424168,0.0003028084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915638,0.0024771872,0.001935624,0.000087830784,0.0038560485,0.0000795216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03481884,0.00010249797,0.00023044152,0.0022621783,0.0027316534,0.0007068484,0.010372303,0.000086107735,0.000016569844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11025143,0.00003897777,0.00021258558,0.023618134,0.0057691825,0.0010671734,0.0014036145,0.00036554105,0.0000017710505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007565034,0.00027217783,0.48618677,0.000044156015,0.00006804518,1.6079083e-8,0.0031930502,0.0001804132,0.36311445,0.09330386,0.027963618,0.0255978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117856864,0.000039084258,0.7583858,0.000027901662,0.0000041448525,0.000002681692,0.0010962955,0.0007881036,0.18558866,0.05200197,0.0018868452,0.000060647828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004239975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025432155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27219903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067253684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565692730","doi":"","title":"Working Towards a Standard Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.2165147500558145,"score_gpt":0.4233536953542099,"score_spread":0.20683894529839542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565692730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60548824,0.00012372283,0.39042875,0.001751881,0.000459896,0.00005338639,0.00002633112,0.000004462696,0.0016633109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936378,0.00080553844,0.0013579744,0.000016485663,0.00016178664,1.3943419e-8,5.7753647e-7,0.0000053423364,0.0040145083],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186957,0.00047954297,0.00073250337,0.00025148175,0.006310562,0.00035636022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921127,0.0023138947,0.0013145233,0.0006492252,0.0033361886,0.00027348145],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020595584,0.00013807761,0.0007183845,0.020212578,0.00030501012,0.00023093699,0.0035366383,0.00009452432,0.00057012576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040511754,0.000068409514,0.0007683628,0.052293357,0.00039558296,0.0004862642,0.0005410972,0.0002349321,0.000023990868],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01008678,0.00042900053,0.35409653,0.0000104859555,0.006528318,0.00022237551,0.0033763302,0.10422315,0.011049259,0.0035621354,0.01914179,0.48727384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017966831,0.002365566,0.1834208,0.0001869018,0.008279347,0.00015613103,0.009028997,0.6187954,0.00027494863,0.10120343,0.056945983,0.0013756406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044364095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015131847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51457226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041377774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051056576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99089247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571086138","doi":"10.1186/s12916-016-0773-5","title":"The Journal Impact Factor is under attack – use the CAPCI factor instead","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Medicine; Publishing; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.8179097266428235,"score_gpt":0.6585456402439596,"score_spread":0.1593640863988639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571086138","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01679844,0.008780011,0.001407855,0.0042092083,0.9654974,0.0006810677,0.0008940028,0.000025308098,0.0017067567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03267464,0.015383804,0.000045068748,0.00028381316,0.87973356,0.000010872122,0.000034913064,0.00008427502,0.07174907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95826733,0.0013159141,0.001725969,0.0009896497,0.036271177,0.0014299306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87847096,0.10494284,0.0021885927,0.003997812,0.009212989,0.0011867955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040344357,0.0006387336,0.001125853,0.021392427,0.003244475,0.011517657,0.014039349,0.0009268748,0.0029666207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3799283,0.00021042892,0.0006158485,0.035154093,0.0016063243,0.0009836373,0.0014832056,0.0036263322,0.0007741401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008368517,0.000025855532,0.004789607,0.000006283717,0.0000912927,0.000012573486,0.00032191974,0.0000051332404,0.000012568796,0.000004627625,0.97524977,0.0193967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010022258,0.000455376,0.045673348,0.00008154991,0.00004107508,0.000020215612,0.00045799854,0.00021799808,0.000006864072,0.00047983733,0.95129263,0.00027090212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011233552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006578789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33958393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005945466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040432205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574224592","doi":"10.7577/formakademisk.1880","title":"Open access to scientific publishing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Norwegian; Publication; Library science; Scientific publishing; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8345386635894187,"score_gpt":0.6277893077125516,"score_spread":0.20674935587686716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574224592","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011571932,0.0001858355,0.964202,0.010011435,0.0022219627,0.0052495687,0.0003668721,0.000233622,0.0059567704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7402927,0.00008936823,0.18946919,0.0030450528,0.0008307596,0.002290988,0.00005525271,0.0002596851,0.06366697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97890055,0.00069550314,0.0025099753,0.0033500886,0.011202459,0.0033414005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96377414,0.021259462,0.0012442332,0.0031694572,0.007692663,0.0028600518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09454823,0.000733328,0.0011364492,0.048037145,0.0025377949,0.10780117,0.036984522,0.00056383427,0.0012565727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16503663,0.0004490868,0.000544787,0.11910303,0.0009034351,0.034151733,0.0104825,0.00054680876,0.001820077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061222335,0.00013215377,0.0065817013,0.000014990477,0.000049319304,0.000009495705,0.0002681038,0.00015689422,0.010411788,0.010392275,0.67703986,0.29433116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034974278,0.0012679035,0.0028403772,0.0001789419,0.00004072091,0.000034413268,0.00017251694,0.0051591643,0.03245375,0.14769998,0.8053482,0.0013066058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008153118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016372533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7747328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005936477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015128838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576026594","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000001852","title":"Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecialty; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Medicine; Reproductive endocrinology and infertility; Gynecology; Reproductive medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Odds ratio; Obstetrics; Family medicine; Pregnancy; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.4407357565372697,"score_gpt":0.5384816350212948,"score_spread":0.09774587848402505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576026594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98207915,0.009384195,0.0002500556,0.0025557484,0.0037800851,0.0009036385,0.00025934516,0.000016637185,0.00077112904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603404,0.009208522,0.00095892895,0.0005322099,0.0001092777,0.000027481736,0.000014902595,0.000029264245,0.0030853844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064016,0.0003789154,0.000985697,0.0014320225,0.005317167,0.0012460615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87733763,0.1032065,0.0015888818,0.0021223845,0.014128078,0.0016165457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01743663,0.00039196858,0.0009955475,0.019670334,0.002993692,0.009306276,0.0028490212,0.00037232912,0.000344269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67046684,0.0002423228,0.00017649354,0.024974784,0.001169614,0.0014519719,0.0007399596,0.00072038756,0.000057181573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006478494,0.0003798277,0.21116732,0.00008125776,0.00006775459,0.00015571332,0.00016633884,0.000028124514,0.00012529992,0.002236485,0.02057507,0.764952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018547394,0.004099472,0.69214684,0.000044978446,0.000040609542,0.00009133201,0.00008557645,0.0005617212,0.000045552915,0.0055077146,0.29509416,0.00042726868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046110305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000108117965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76452476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003550331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079638173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583760632","doi":"","title":"Factors Affecting Researchers' Collaborative Patterns: A Case Study from Maghreb Universities / Les facteurs affectant les pratiques de collaboration des chercheurs : Une étude de cas des universités maghrébines","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Regional science; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.3660604929998541,"score_gpt":0.4633948524617138,"score_spread":0.0973343594618597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583760632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791313,0.0002663877,0.009488848,0.0008603656,0.00033070738,0.0020301659,0.001758267,0.00020932952,0.0059246435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92425716,0.0731572,0.0015538465,0.000012811355,0.00011413889,0.0000046610776,0.000019164685,0.000071377486,0.0008096389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850416,0.00709858,0.0006449113,0.0018178002,0.0033247988,0.0020723112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761303,0.013140056,0.0006517639,0.0009686288,0.008049634,0.0010595946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073999576,0.0008819851,0.0009329326,0.111840695,0.0027484773,0.0024347254,0.0024778761,0.0007304553,0.0004532085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010706295,0.00072168396,0.00033902883,0.24196084,0.0018937446,0.004904329,0.00169993,0.0009795403,0.000024686351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005371825,0.00118136,0.6166017,0.000112161484,0.00055033324,0.013385899,0.22161648,0.000068205445,0.00046473072,0.0002272399,0.0001540169,0.14510067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030615039,0.0021948533,0.113955304,0.00041933183,0.00030332495,0.00011098129,0.84717333,0.00048421658,0.004184223,0.00003657813,0.027163226,0.0009131462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70912683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6615752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6255568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009657235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076377317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585591443","doi":"10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9","title":"Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Internet privacy; Impact factor; The Internet; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6717010139878978,"score_gpt":0.6176027597723336,"score_spread":0.054098254215564245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585591443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771698,0.0017390029,0.011496519,0.0052355938,0.0020290308,0.00022732814,0.000055202494,0.000016778253,0.0020307582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948473,0.0002299152,0.00022230796,0.00018007125,0.00094173366,0.000008539371,0.0000048487477,0.000007905213,0.003557361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884252,0.00024216525,0.00088978786,0.00063693995,0.009280698,0.00052520714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353856,0.002610091,0.00059130497,0.0011589075,0.001396972,0.0007041392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02291877,0.00016339285,0.0003986543,0.00970865,0.0017630372,0.00417348,0.0031413601,0.00014077929,0.0014480373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0522534,0.000075880984,0.00009036176,0.010107432,0.0026741412,0.0003870276,0.0009890201,0.0005072729,0.000067311514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003667188,0.000061415034,0.9687755,0.0000069571624,0.000012575462,0.0000150577,0.0001086056,0.0000037061213,0.00072857563,0.00015528486,0.010141585,0.01995404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804843,0.00018356738,0.9733989,0.000021058446,0.000007750448,0.00007888724,0.0002290716,0.010364964,0.000056368186,0.00278495,0.011800022,0.000093945775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004495529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009014886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029334629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052931773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002756931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586606665","doi":"10.5539/ass.v13n3p1","title":"Understanding Faculty Collaboration and Productivity: A Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"Productivity; Promotion (chess); Christian ministry; Internationalization; Higher education; Business; Public relations; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.8111552102405455,"score_gpt":0.6368228360453961,"score_spread":0.17433237419514935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586606665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92101055,0.000010200609,0.0010678917,0.0037595935,0.00039549303,0.0004158696,0.000013294736,0.00001579469,0.07331129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992593,0.0000015644944,0.00013049105,0.000015485892,0.00010907471,0.0000069376215,1.6288517e-7,0.0000034079897,0.00047360937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200535,0.00012484887,0.000251513,0.00084279967,0.006325341,0.00045015436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970474,0.00024430384,0.00028607156,0.00061248627,0.0015238654,0.00028584653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024377402,0.00009209771,0.00017501606,0.008688497,0.007905312,0.01582328,0.0017602933,0.0000441099,0.00002236176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029591035,0.00006754325,0.000028428916,0.0610711,0.0016525886,0.0029046591,0.0010522569,0.00014031836,0.00002042034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001177548,0.00027184066,0.3590074,0.0000020827306,0.000008208509,0.00066479266,0.017314302,2.2552955e-7,0.0009166716,0.012828583,0.002076704,0.6068974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004984502,0.0002066504,0.8192782,0.0000018293275,0.000006010461,0.0001255573,0.15993775,0.00025795726,0.00014897723,0.018023524,0.0013148838,0.00020024889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034240854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056360394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6066972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028447452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042120213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99338627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586978505","doi":"10.29173/cais156","title":"A Note on Maximum Impact Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Log-normal distribution; Mathematics; Statistics; Value (mathematics); Constant (computer programming); Impact factor; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23459389169425204,"score_gpt":0.4466566847427,"score_spread":0.21206279304844794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586978505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791474,0.00006783377,0.00004203119,0.0020521823,0.00023610439,0.00046558568,0.00018481136,0.000024524867,0.017779538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981252,0.00005906352,0.00022427808,0.00013529067,0.00006113536,0.000018154606,0.0000016179941,0.000019588677,0.0013556492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991944,0.000056172805,0.0009256428,0.0006396787,0.005609915,0.00082457106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7489691,0.0035044677,0.001810485,0.0008396075,0.24407439,0.0008019549],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229582,0.00033233225,0.0006747161,0.010434472,0.00021314729,0.016240269,0.0066178716,0.00022285093,0.0006265771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.270012,0.00018039053,0.00047059014,0.031990536,0.0005736845,0.012031515,0.0015172259,0.00047751,0.00010530358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010090176,0.0003062346,0.884383,0.000042752585,0.000064448715,9.725131e-7,0.008220128,0.000010833665,0.02256762,0.0025330575,0.03394183,0.047828183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044462408,0.00075908407,0.9158984,0.00007071119,0.000016930131,0.000007986675,0.0019422489,0.0009819188,0.033127304,0.027673185,0.018781465,0.00029617434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087840005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006470837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2647824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013517782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042318561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586984894","doi":"","title":"Author Impact Measures in Communication Sciences and Disorders","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Library science; Index (typography); Rank (graph theory); Accreditation; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Medical education; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.3506480710563327,"score_gpt":0.4601388249772967,"score_spread":0.10949075392096397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586984894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949074,0.0019824603,0.000069110785,0.00078358885,0.00006103919,0.00021618587,0.000058363177,0.00000790926,0.0019139919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807817,0.00045925434,0.00018178002,0.000005302982,0.000009410973,2.5701485e-7,0.000007527474,0.0000039882143,0.0012543276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997147,0.00030836413,0.0003436495,0.0003398913,0.0016486297,0.00021242081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593854,0.0013773014,0.0002440622,0.00033249162,0.0018534575,0.00025413974],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005439843,0.00011844161,0.0002844031,0.0072979582,0.00047438167,0.00008726221,0.00094380486,0.00007871998,0.000010947725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064775115,0.00008669593,0.00009754583,0.02871926,0.00091862376,0.0010848915,0.000705158,0.00022646642,0.0000068934037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019078216,0.00015790165,0.95079035,0.0000046468617,0.00001106734,8.724335e-7,0.00079640927,0.000073484014,0.0000076280385,0.000039587696,0.0008627226,0.047064565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010962611,0.00037837587,0.989882,0.000013342279,0.0000086244145,0.000006323222,0.00017382599,0.0025923282,0.0000117168975,0.0014406224,0.0043047126,0.000091891816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039770498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013125865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046972673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015162607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037285872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587002354","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2017.1280936","title":"Science transformed? A comparative analysis of ‘societal relevance’ rhetoric and practices in 14 Canadian Networks of Centres of Excellence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Mandate; Commercialization; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Rhetoric; Political science; Sociology; Funding Agency; Science policy; Science communication; Relevance (law); Public administration; Science education; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.44495664085385184,"score_gpt":0.5618280944689807,"score_spread":0.1168714536151289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587002354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99304485,0.0018157233,0.0014077685,0.00030683758,0.000093646566,0.00022573836,0.00005903136,0.0000022143463,0.0030441915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.0015882245,0.0008630128,0.0000046544415,0.0000056068825,0.000004445022,3.9014563e-7,0.00000240503,0.00019290255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941793,0.00021324123,0.00079985027,0.00052868703,0.003789931,0.0004889736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883362,0.007683876,0.0008860466,0.0004272471,0.002338006,0.00032863682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017706165,0.00010377394,0.00059824437,0.06140911,0.00008258241,0.000116681236,0.0013969336,0.000069319714,0.00013288282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025636509,0.000059875016,0.00011656854,0.25695062,0.0012415835,0.0007393454,0.00015564404,0.00011813735,0.000001759598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000859346,0.00021432978,0.87721276,0.000022700995,0.00013839011,0.000003065535,0.003034207,0.00039646632,0.017201358,0.0013955793,0.000098122975,0.10019709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068480504,0.0005175189,0.95365536,0.00007168121,0.00008772167,0.0000016073468,0.001971392,0.028537204,0.011276884,0.0017117718,0.0012855675,0.00019848667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013829927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022622831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1955415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119526274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008193579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587252982","doi":"10.18192/uojm.v7i1.1755","title":"Predatory Journals : Do Not Enter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Audience measurement; Political science; Credibility; Publishing; Library science; Art; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5181515019525601,"score_gpt":0.5358257010649157,"score_spread":0.01767419911235557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587252982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91828245,0.0024416284,0.0072703958,0.0269254,0.0017613075,0.00010130601,0.000021234158,0.0000036165504,0.043192673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392235,0.0009289754,0.0006989697,0.000093043855,0.0002490664,4.927268e-9,1.1696876e-7,0.0000034129494,0.0041040764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910671,0.00017793164,0.00067561714,0.0001880855,0.0076497314,0.00024154765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941594,0.0013578304,0.0022846556,0.0007046997,0.0057314895,0.0005054001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02674582,0.00008831956,0.0004890739,0.022866348,0.00042468324,0.0003198836,0.0046159173,0.00008575576,0.004034122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03368877,0.000058290992,0.00020581839,0.007242356,0.0008449097,0.001062655,0.00047847943,0.00039653733,0.000041223015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017640089,0.00017025438,0.45744282,0.000012420661,0.00012216,0.00063564564,0.00088568573,0.000020737762,0.0033090976,0.0009336268,0.3631361,0.17315504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032275002,0.00063039054,0.5954286,0.00015924218,0.000034844976,0.00012925525,0.002277548,0.000105794905,0.00070410426,0.0016740875,0.39554206,0.000086561646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008404381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013807237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17306848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006845838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023459915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968763},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2587601278","doi":"10.59348/fv8ch-rjm75","title":"Dissemination and Assessment: Open Access, Reputation and Economics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Economics; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8350313941308984,"score_gpt":0.7252318026089551,"score_spread":0.1097995915219433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587601278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7572083,0.0012158722,0.009123884,0.007374044,0.000917975,0.0012838843,0.00013659736,0.000029352534,0.22271012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756801,0.0041723293,0.009543976,0.00015630803,0.000071981536,0.000048209855,0.0000798902,0.000015047729,0.010232131],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540865,0.00017863592,0.0006505263,0.0011797291,0.0023384937,0.00024397534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934171,0.0024074698,0.0004809261,0.00069893803,0.002458372,0.00053722],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027409824,0.00016570446,0.00037992178,0.026607107,0.0001594947,0.054530513,0.0038360078,0.00022013012,0.00026338352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022479637,0.000120356075,0.000035928984,0.022944111,0.000120593366,0.0028392507,0.025713678,0.00037381606,0.000016482862],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011337024,0.000056552624,0.088378616,0.000016779733,0.00001813117,0.0000025861182,0.00011864904,0.00010736609,0.000008689058,0.008207535,0.07147668,0.8315971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003565165,0.00006563342,0.31811064,0.000023247563,0.000011896859,0.0000063033795,0.00036854733,0.13086458,0.00005482455,0.5117985,0.038013596,0.00032574346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040579142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007567672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83127135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017041317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008109893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589205765","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Entrepreneurship: In Ottawa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.9595516944596619,"score_gpt":0.7220228475040606,"score_spread":0.23752884695560128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589205765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006280755,0.015115898,0.00058160536,0.010277511,0.0023297693,0.0012055591,0.00021778463,0.00014200542,0.9638491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008094634,0.007831132,0.021495074,0.0010474351,0.0015433311,0.00017475942,0.000102436534,0.00015081486,0.9595604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9041153,0.023021448,0.0049064886,0.004655262,0.058222,0.005079466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.801135,0.14934206,0.0010780691,0.007249916,0.03787307,0.0033218665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53013927,0.0006452108,0.0014631393,0.23840904,0.00031740923,0.008422934,0.016415149,0.002884113,0.007585269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7199547,0.00045490495,0.00046834475,0.40010273,0.0008096902,0.0008862103,0.0048356643,0.0064708,0.005117612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023649092,0.00018102358,0.023913201,0.00002342496,0.00001807774,0.00017266655,0.0002481463,0.000025388465,0.000055861787,0.00091731135,0.86308557,0.11133571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045432325,0.00020627538,0.0028045059,0.000095339026,0.000005192058,0.000021310108,0.0013429302,0.0007088338,0.00037181092,0.16756666,0.82595867,0.00046413482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009110507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029751167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18981543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004411925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009525208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589854312","doi":"10.1139/facets-2016-0032","title":"Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Open access publishing; Limiting; Scholarly communication; Ecology; Impact factor; Open science; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Engineering; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.846648632210217,"score_gpt":0.7068189903548356,"score_spread":0.13982964185538138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589854312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715421,0.00007702062,0.00015821635,0.012411617,0.00046697867,0.00032643575,0.000035999,0.0000068779646,0.014974721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537814,0.00017902564,0.0006718397,0.0002812282,0.000041123196,0.000024925017,0.0000026140597,0.0000065752556,0.0034145245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953066,0.00020023299,0.0005741863,0.000540293,0.0028631377,0.00051555893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994751,0.0019888368,0.0004197769,0.0011313561,0.0013899105,0.00031917196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014548395,0.00009524689,0.00029640232,0.025511345,0.00056909147,0.023278182,0.012520228,0.000058829708,0.0036188057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074044175,0.00007164164,0.000062409184,0.03072786,0.0001956703,0.0036112887,0.009106657,0.00026440172,0.00063288276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012765104,0.00008473432,0.80501795,6.5260406e-7,0.000005767877,0.00006290658,0.00008396377,0.00006208739,0.0001500055,0.00012854264,0.02347888,0.17091176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055403763,0.000040912237,0.9477121,0.000005476105,0.0000015040821,0.00000911502,0.00015092266,0.0018418026,0.0006034699,0.04136829,0.007618739,0.00009363051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089041446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011547965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17081814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008847551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021594955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590507073","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3703","title":"An Exploration of Faculty Experiences With Open Access Journal Publishing at Two Canadian Comprehensive Universities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries; Brock University; University of Guelph","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Scholarly communication; Descriptive statistics; The arts; Outreach; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.8004430090618715,"score_gpt":0.6257924483870849,"score_spread":0.17465056067478657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590507073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87482125,0.00038581903,0.000059289592,0.074635826,0.00015855124,0.00021999853,0.000029342225,0.0000012481021,0.049688704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981864,0.00041534196,0.00020124906,0.0006545314,0.00007941925,0.0000020387117,0.0000065912063,0.0000032834046,0.00045113463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953032,0.0008587669,0.0005057428,0.000120794204,0.0028046533,0.00040680903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905108,0.0021500043,0.0010246206,0.0003619544,0.004295313,0.0016572977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017421223,0.000081551094,0.00017989875,0.013259453,0.0049835774,0.092286825,0.004915335,0.0000682085,0.00026416202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008708816,0.00004453351,0.000028258866,0.0073704184,0.0009443967,0.37887833,0.0006250883,0.0006920817,0.0000041766543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003100831,0.00008743969,0.22416086,0.00007255849,0.00030599514,0.0005346577,0.31129345,0.00090435083,0.000019784786,0.1445621,0.14815816,0.16679981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080943125,0.00056028325,0.03472285,0.000048770464,0.000009653959,0.00037217676,0.52907276,0.00068210106,0.00025022982,0.0026837096,0.43067047,0.000117545125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053620372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042349786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2865915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009831123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007085504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590870827","doi":"","title":"Taking the Plunge: Open Access at the \"Canadian Journal of Sociology.\" Case Studies in Open Access Publishing. Number Five.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Research: An International Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Open access publishing; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.89796711116227,"score_gpt":0.723946756507205,"score_spread":0.17402035465506505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590870827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126548,0.0010206404,0.00046828744,0.035363227,0.0014037185,0.00079307193,0.00005743308,0.0000037938944,0.04823499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994458,0.0023418143,0.000042085667,0.0009682364,0.00031558034,0.000030923864,0.000010173902,0.000008326853,0.0018248449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98552024,0.0020045214,0.0017777405,0.00028858104,0.009061039,0.0013478909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96901333,0.00643411,0.0017450192,0.0005808434,0.02166586,0.0005608428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11761947,0.0001601238,0.0003290047,0.02328331,0.004314975,0.09294292,0.038925167,0.00014260157,0.0039981073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103469186,0.000082376515,0.00014320157,0.0345959,0.0014014395,0.07354462,0.009990384,0.00346885,0.00013256002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054471515,0.00018090745,0.37469465,0.000009368722,0.0004875122,0.0019695286,0.030133748,0.003524437,0.0000055225346,0.06892576,0.42496932,0.094554536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004318983,0.0005789173,0.27538276,0.00012181172,0.000012727864,0.06772875,0.032555003,0.010726784,0.000083516905,0.33542654,0.27259594,0.0004682588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02381657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08022809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2665008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010518523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591407960","doi":"10.29173/cais338","title":"Optimizing the Transformation of Knowledge Dissemination: Towards a Canadian Research Strategy: Preliminary Results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Political science; Relevance (law); Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.31530120657037286,"score_gpt":0.4702846259320446,"score_spread":0.15498341936167176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591407960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109431,0.00038802595,0.000033144373,0.008121642,0.00011878915,0.00078847836,0.0002504821,0.000009403736,0.07934695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789983,0.00018042052,0.00021750014,0.000021259057,0.000047379483,0.00004879947,0.000004045388,0.000011391631,0.0015693998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930931,0.00015532547,0.0011516481,0.00043285236,0.004447084,0.00071998907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68354696,0.003726286,0.0010470774,0.00062302296,0.31051648,0.000540163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01948247,0.00019133749,0.00041798767,0.009893978,0.00042043714,0.008040506,0.0058095427,0.00019262418,0.000113161586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17648908,0.000107868786,0.00019098564,0.03560764,0.0009415635,0.010458353,0.00076046825,0.00053455733,0.000017976594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006903937,0.00063211774,0.038067248,0.00047758358,0.00014846087,0.000002037143,0.25909898,0.000090314206,0.022347957,0.031404022,0.10332583,0.54371506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011348956,0.0022689118,0.74671346,0.00058390887,0.00004757622,0.000028674438,0.06621266,0.020718576,0.08755156,0.024868445,0.049361378,0.0005099662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014161793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008581322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015056487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014627193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591413103","doi":"10.1515/jdis-2017-0003","title":"Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Generalizability theory; Computer science; Information retrieval; Reliability (semiconductor); Scalability; Citation analysis; Data science; Data mining; Statistics; Mathematics; Library science; Database","score_opus":0.6861484169349686,"score_gpt":0.616220425292139,"score_spread":0.06992799164282959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591413103","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35347983,0.00013481226,0.64266974,0.0022634538,0.00017205816,0.00015575964,0.0006463874,0.0000021318488,0.00047584172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622068,0.0003573423,0.037311107,0.00005050344,0.000014585825,0.0000018639402,0.000021731328,8.813782e-7,0.00003517699],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969384,0.000026507609,0.0008560134,0.00015794966,0.0018852693,0.00013585923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878871,0.0013358293,0.0016335602,0.00080275844,0.00814736,0.0001934028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018415676,0.00004999131,0.00018050721,0.029243534,0.0010091066,0.003001402,0.0022077358,0.000029534898,0.0000115412295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042654708,0.00003333923,0.000047567395,0.034104235,0.000555787,0.027237661,0.00046704843,0.00006871946,0.0000026680991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029135757,0.000071236114,0.35801408,0.000012527837,0.000074961616,8.331814e-8,0.00070558547,0.00007527287,0.0014467335,0.010472925,0.0030715587,0.6260259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037869776,0.00007373344,0.8969001,0.0000040359982,0.00004560134,0.0000030512165,0.0008062366,0.093281314,0.0000515308,0.0023935833,0.0060203746,0.00004171557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014555921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009418882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6259842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020931642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029272516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591428690","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Chief Scientist of Quebec on Science Advice at the Sub-National Level","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2017 AAAS Annual Meeting (February 16-20, 2017)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); NASA Chief Scientist; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.28007599708106107,"score_gpt":0.4737946592179971,"score_spread":0.19371866213693606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591428690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7940739,0.00057023834,0.000056611494,0.010676159,0.0037788532,0.0005062544,0.0023659642,0.000031948966,0.18794012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94525784,0.000046987436,0.00026374942,0.0005120264,0.0003472951,0.000012245655,0.00001869659,0.000020776206,0.053520363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97490585,0.00028599275,0.0010800178,0.0015379678,0.020838186,0.0013519832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98211676,0.003886496,0.0016774363,0.0029768643,0.008584283,0.00075813197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03901956,0.00036316933,0.0005270063,0.010912532,0.007118297,0.004339419,0.011659658,0.00014684915,0.00033454632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07227006,0.00023029666,0.00021797304,0.021033332,0.0033871057,0.0018976736,0.003639642,0.00050245895,0.0005010969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071979055,0.000165336,0.039057948,0.000011275799,0.000022938511,0.000028906275,0.0002474972,0.00021018223,0.004701235,0.0022254083,0.936297,0.016960321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069828134,0.00017258953,0.8212515,0.00009295853,0.000012549998,0.00003592197,0.0006321596,0.0017981828,0.009416021,0.0015634281,0.16383228,0.00049410644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70753765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8649114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7821936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011490317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008504649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592422958","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.137","title":"The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Political science; Advertising; Psychology; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6179006571062694,"score_gpt":0.5339360884481533,"score_spread":0.08396456865811608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592422958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978648,0.0032630768,0.0019562594,0.06385383,0.0021517365,0.00018861244,0.000036392146,0.000010892958,0.030674407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848595,0.0006429548,0.0022750401,0.0001589592,0.000410482,0.0000037426541,9.268281e-7,0.0000143668185,0.011634012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98333156,0.0003999729,0.0017825812,0.00037632117,0.013577313,0.00053226674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91237,0.005867915,0.0053061494,0.0028267605,0.07260005,0.0010291009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.111765854,0.00013029276,0.00037020168,0.025336925,0.002559039,0.28168792,0.016475765,0.00021626899,0.0002574519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.71831036,0.00007167824,0.00027334926,0.045192726,0.00039068758,0.09930483,0.0029943464,0.0016293433,0.000053992473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059739592,0.00010597111,0.7147208,0.0000071063955,0.000059117996,0.000010049147,0.00010034962,0.000015906413,0.001932855,0.0026098227,0.18858956,0.09178872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039309877,0.00005003033,0.7050924,0.000025493366,0.000007798887,0.000045676534,0.0002528399,0.000084302264,0.00023486852,0.0057574585,0.28798681,0.00006922274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013015744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009646546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6065445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003289105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016567516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592437185","doi":"10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x","title":"Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"3v Geomatics (Canada); Women's Health Research Institute; B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre","funders":"British Ecological Society; Ecological Society of America; Society for the Study of Evolution","keywords":"Demography; Medicine; Gerontology; Ecology; Psychology; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.8090483276171163,"score_gpt":0.6622627539633377,"score_spread":0.14678557365377864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592437185","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025772454,0.93180895,0.0000021063909,0.011036277,0.027585013,0.002798155,0.0006991639,0.0000019186011,0.00029598753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00654475,0.98257834,0.00008259507,0.00008254914,0.00630599,0.00008736342,0.0000073829783,0.000016656852,0.004294385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9617069,0.0053209574,0.004153596,0.0011565923,0.026690667,0.00097132253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82454765,0.067569174,0.007961532,0.0044520716,0.09441885,0.0010507157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24278136,0.00034845195,0.0026647598,0.013699664,0.0005505351,0.0005201535,0.0041913474,0.00076565525,0.0005209294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7379476,0.00019318551,0.00052507047,0.025694234,0.0016282039,0.0006622484,0.004254799,0.004103616,0.000023113418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024618039,0.00012952667,0.06711761,0.0071317223,0.000044452157,0.0000045847937,0.000107572916,7.488179e-7,0.00013936452,0.0000377978,0.8967075,0.028554553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037903554,0.00026958782,0.079638556,0.03925018,0.000052578165,0.000012214059,0.000031160183,0.00001675768,0.000083376784,0.0020110244,0.8780813,0.00017418561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072144705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052420696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49516624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007623481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017765661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998194},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2592511444","doi":"","title":"Portraying the Landscape of Canadian Library and Information Science Research = Portrait de la recherche en bibliothéconomie et sciences de l'information au Canada","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Library science; Information scientist; Information science; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.4033794212991128,"score_gpt":0.4577124276854481,"score_spread":0.054333006386335314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592511444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33775583,0.000031893374,0.0006460588,0.015513855,0.00022289486,0.00042023585,0.0002298636,0.000014422445,0.64516497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82179165,0.17484762,0.0027696874,0.00039893194,0.000043373282,0.0000021876865,0.000003563067,0.000006372912,0.000136644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176365,0.002819527,0.00048084915,0.00039778184,0.003210014,0.0013281838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97566193,0.021527424,0.00031056788,0.00048314518,0.0012528973,0.000764051],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07052347,0.00016592562,0.00020717343,0.4211826,0.0012583835,0.0025837834,0.002988431,0.0003080206,0.00016933023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0330657,0.00011150252,0.00006122944,0.5557425,0.0026281998,0.024421377,0.0009321771,0.00072995457,0.000013286503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006623306,0.000047676305,0.10963804,0.00007394732,0.000029100187,0.000049406462,0.011856523,0.00009028876,0.00005289472,0.1441617,0.00659348,0.7273407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037654053,0.0001429522,0.04502236,0.00008373031,0.000008579543,0.000037472968,0.00746111,0.0017784041,0.0006047502,0.0000834195,0.9442402,0.00016044496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98857564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89689374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93764675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022522167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11596533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593004197","doi":"10.1101/108357","title":"The Rise of the Middle Author: Investigating Collaboration and Division of Labor in Biomedical Research using Partial Alphabetical Authorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Period (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5333238123347174,"score_gpt":0.5116136643576324,"score_spread":0.021710147977084926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593004197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923226,0.0028637769,0.00030781265,0.002112114,0.0012745996,0.0008756608,0.00021909794,0.000016365186,0.00000796339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975566,0.000216725,0.0019656331,0.00001088444,0.00016091965,0.0000415884,8.089434e-8,0.000034926416,0.0000125863335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98305684,0.0025672652,0.001861788,0.0012929757,0.0102128945,0.0010082483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797351,0.00692631,0.0015995764,0.0031224103,0.007980031,0.0006365807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07633205,0.0003251932,0.0007398239,0.011574953,0.0011484404,0.0024985478,0.0044603935,0.0007670936,0.000013860997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16995484,0.00019665387,0.00015202616,0.053564038,0.0036180615,0.00034585697,0.0053867567,0.0018786365,0.0000066463663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000721124,0.00035606674,0.5124232,0.00025815525,0.000056936216,0.000016495149,0.0002896158,0.00010471395,0.4784248,0.007030905,0.00073715526,0.0002298507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007794439,0.00017439052,0.7823646,0.0010235539,0.000033683355,3.0312894e-8,0.00015075604,0.0672579,0.14365663,0.001437739,0.0026758139,0.0004454704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034319068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030178453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33476818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027824665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002991787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593988437","doi":"10.2196/jmir.6250","title":"Public Funding and Open Access to Research: A Review of Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Calgary; Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple sclerosis; Demyelinating disease; Medicine; Public health; Family medicine; Gerontology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.9941987440381901,"score_gpt":0.8009483234132166,"score_spread":0.19325042062497344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593988437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006689488,0.94489276,0.00002571171,0.036830526,0.00083004934,0.0026557872,0.000113338305,0.0000029447503,0.014582008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012097709,0.99227715,0.00019978156,0.0001778024,0.0007365779,0.00014240821,0.0000087735925,0.0000666572,0.005181103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.81688595,0.028620046,0.0073785405,0.0025739535,0.13897063,0.005570881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67138714,0.16395527,0.0037586417,0.0072264015,0.1281878,0.025484733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.71121806,0.00045313724,0.0045577926,0.3585816,0.0013047308,0.03872658,0.0897875,0.0011486503,0.008098001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.824524,0.00027527023,0.000809813,0.27066508,0.0032439039,0.0030587926,0.053404525,0.013432555,0.0006900768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017286393,0.0001063401,0.00018429437,0.005251888,0.00008413833,0.0002697657,0.00004739243,8.363191e-9,3.4976088e-7,0.0005120174,0.42871186,0.5648147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032851662,0.000707915,0.00022515432,0.13630901,0.000018779505,0.00015238297,0.00015828025,0.00003438361,0.0000029773003,0.0008362799,0.86101955,0.00020678001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120518915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053236857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56460786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021730273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03340799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594847254","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019","title":"The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Process (computing); Phenomenon; Position paper; Peer review; Data science; Position (finance); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Business; World Wide Web; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7050554478074119,"score_gpt":0.671148843316608,"score_spread":0.03390660449080396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594847254","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024624333,0.60094756,0.0004426773,0.2667894,0.009682576,0.0024923184,0.00018660026,0.00009943426,0.094735086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54058,0.23642007,0.00009305943,0.0036248618,0.0024856564,0.00016704237,0.000015677422,0.000039529135,0.21657415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985262,0.0005287998,0.0020454463,0.0011080906,0.0102469865,0.0008087014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532746,0.015637798,0.0019226507,0.008810199,0.019555714,0.0007990027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12268035,0.00022974239,0.00061158714,0.00065015786,0.0024745797,0.005135575,0.010881625,0.00017609455,0.00020916319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49962127,0.00009384253,0.00075955846,0.014227509,0.0011342055,0.00020292147,0.00259197,0.001048376,0.0009554445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057561697,0.000033424756,0.0059827548,0.0002362136,0.000013167221,0.0000045520624,0.0000027604947,2.469513e-8,0.0000046426007,0.0001751433,0.65982294,0.3337186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002020412,0.000030663374,0.004780379,0.0005519821,0.000029364352,0.000004642845,0.000115071845,0.00017368984,0.00025612162,0.0011332573,0.99256706,0.00015574189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009495366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.998479e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5159556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011824532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055947364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597082463","doi":"10.3390/publications5010005","title":"Accountability and High Impact Journals in the Health Sciences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Citation; Impact factor; Relevance (law); Political science; Norm (philosophy); Public relations; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8430800737748104,"score_gpt":0.7174718517387156,"score_spread":0.12560822203609479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597082463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8422313,0.0007620095,0.00045398256,0.14713928,0.000096629905,0.00022817681,0.000038948263,0.0000066545363,0.009043068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881077,0.00026157085,0.00032250816,0.00038303973,0.00003954771,0.000017714914,8.8529765e-7,0.0000015941571,0.00016239169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943981,0.00029507634,0.00042351996,0.00040209162,0.004083936,0.00039724482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258214,0.003899937,0.00044403132,0.0014939012,0.001319053,0.0002609324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.072025344,0.000060732058,0.0001489706,0.01642197,0.0023662753,0.018930998,0.004453395,0.000031495714,0.00036638876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059964754,0.000029196952,0.000049269314,0.0526683,0.0005903305,0.001896652,0.0004487897,0.00019402092,0.000047061818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7194826e-7,0.00006275978,0.8829104,4.9130455e-7,0.0000012376255,7.916427e-8,0.00020788482,0.0000024730289,0.0000055135697,0.005888206,0.013555662,0.09736443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083008345,0.000043209646,0.960396,0.000001603896,3.8185792e-7,0.000004888265,0.0003755197,0.0006015367,0.0000019565607,0.029760905,0.008696086,0.000034905082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028339012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047893263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1565795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073651565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047293445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597139062","doi":"10.1177/2325967117694024","title":"The h-Index of Editorial Board Members Correlates Positively With the Impact Factor of Sports Medicine Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Editorial board; Medicine; Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Interquartile range; Library science; Statistics; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18094606262248883,"score_gpt":0.49283091591464406,"score_spread":0.3118848532921552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597139062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511468,0.009916226,0.0006981899,0.014989767,0.019276582,0.00036353475,0.000021374495,0.000005266549,0.0035823064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199034,0.006394885,0.0000312224,0.000051082843,0.010837875,0.0000010113953,8.56688e-7,0.000022575927,0.0006701642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96937484,0.00023854552,0.0028619594,0.0003835852,0.026447058,0.00069404073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702709,0.0060797897,0.009380488,0.0013307687,0.012055094,0.00088299386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054875925,0.0003559022,0.0014455469,0.012253895,0.0008738811,0.0003504825,0.003998798,0.00019616474,0.0014067218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033934727,0.00011887064,0.00049147266,0.017002009,0.0035496226,0.0006297498,0.00031986373,0.0012364754,0.0000017988934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096975,0.00007594057,0.6853396,0.000009366463,0.00022132165,0.00033911288,0.0007097818,0.00007440205,0.00034049802,0.000056452936,0.13317758,0.17855896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003080174,0.0017554959,0.9771229,0.0011359218,0.00014386442,0.00039580654,0.0026766348,0.00011731299,0.00016315086,0.0019301993,0.011327972,0.00015055393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034232816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015640115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2917833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010438762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009855551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995061},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2597934390","doi":"10.3138/topia.36.173","title":"The Organized Response to the “War on Science” and the Lost Potential for Challenging Commercialization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.4042814184711806,"score_gpt":0.5199030871833054,"score_spread":0.11562166871212476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597934390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62418073,0.0042782486,0.00047288113,0.36922807,0.0012242652,0.00037222134,0.000011673414,0.0000016461662,0.00023026868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964781,0.0010183885,0.000032333206,0.00069880293,0.00022402692,0.000004097649,2.8771504e-8,0.0000032019584,0.0015410159],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962217,0.00030640708,0.00037991613,0.00016360168,0.0025395167,0.00038884376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841998,0.0073041334,0.00022420751,0.00024818032,0.0076557677,0.0003679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032659627,0.00008186149,0.00018497878,0.0035387052,0.0031593896,0.0012822733,0.0015388926,0.000020927047,0.000018803219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123121455,0.000021322605,0.000072865,0.01690084,0.0011790437,0.00027209087,0.00014435053,0.00009590709,0.000018725623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003519922,0.000023353277,0.0031724442,0.0000052651762,0.00026758324,0.000029348368,0.03020018,0.00017307264,0.00225922,0.049692705,0.3732878,0.53736913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030078117,0.0006441039,0.074378796,0.000060869545,0.00003107633,0.00006376943,0.03216577,0.00022761882,0.0006173991,0.008832718,0.8797782,0.0001918557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027202378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004111285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53717726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024355156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005493336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598028339","doi":"10.1055/s-0037-1600093","title":"The Importance of Facts and the Role of Academic Publishers in Today's World—A Publisher's View","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current research. Concussion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Process (computing); Political science; Peer review; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5386139029589161,"score_gpt":0.5980958235861853,"score_spread":0.0594819206272692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598028339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760831,0.076666586,0.000019613672,0.019192204,0.001089987,0.0013164574,0.000017981947,0.000009306371,0.025604779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916114,0.00706891,0.000012314521,0.000012774362,0.000057425186,0.000027045106,0.0000016256415,0.000008477331,0.0011999789],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98422,0.0015540116,0.0012874656,0.0007199112,0.011266137,0.00095243205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979168,0.01400688,0.00088811846,0.0020852804,0.003444016,0.00040769388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09591831,0.00014963398,0.00046124618,0.014999765,0.0010829607,0.0053719636,0.0074193496,0.0001197156,0.00013402193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16079143,0.000060798862,0.00013696797,0.04283148,0.0034665647,0.0025048512,0.0036427444,0.0015794628,0.000017381573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010149767,0.0000354483,0.379487,0.00001210531,0.0000050799613,8.8267007e-7,0.00018297338,6.5381977e-7,0.00015983975,0.010854616,0.0169862,0.5921737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016090331,0.00007225645,0.53030145,0.00017825322,0.0000031187562,0.0000012212678,0.0016902043,0.0018297124,0.0008680913,0.13306801,0.33025151,0.00012712934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002703085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031226876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59204656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000943975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053486205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600626313","doi":"","title":"Editorial: The Journey to Publication and Support for the Peer-Review Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Process (computing); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6488343976818888,"score_gpt":0.6616819468873805,"score_spread":0.012847549205491693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600626313","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000059619674,0.011194916,0.00033528425,0.21581423,0.769769,0.00095184974,0.00033364032,0.0000020409877,0.0015930558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038240303,0.0032937168,0.000049698887,0.0002066124,0.97361666,0.000058741873,0.000012269991,0.000038815262,0.022341078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96016634,0.00090746384,0.001350861,0.0006133584,0.035517026,0.0014449572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43052152,0.13462038,0.0021772445,0.003127895,0.42197347,0.0075794957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23206866,0.00022497168,0.0005888537,0.036703333,0.0018474133,0.009802128,0.008621721,0.0004829893,0.0003052681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68766874,0.0000960759,0.00025731567,0.05945155,0.0009166648,0.00063724484,0.00015153927,0.0026538167,0.00008707641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024426632,0.000011648079,0.00002115396,0.00003217518,0.000014948917,0.0000034750792,0.00028938896,4.4559042e-7,0.0000018482631,0.000051360406,0.80627155,0.19327755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002565558,0.00043963955,0.000116925556,0.0013421952,0.000028760594,0.00002454064,0.00045983,0.0000103075645,0.0000039365073,0.006517293,0.9906714,0.00012860296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041019957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006666792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52964485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014149764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022876836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600769155","doi":"","title":"Canada-China SCI and SSCI Co-authorship 1982-2012: Examining Fields, Networks and Institutional Collaborations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Field (mathematics); Regional science; Economic geography; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.4663924248661179,"score_gpt":0.49831502174342784,"score_spread":0.03192259687730992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600769155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8192201,0.0013022125,0.11567912,0.0056443247,0.00080108317,0.00026285546,0.00006950846,0.000028918295,0.056991834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413127,0.00010173068,0.0012183635,0.00049466157,0.00011841293,0.0000054404895,0.000008055705,0.000004275596,0.0039177807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952405,0.00021322386,0.0003883275,0.0005260905,0.0032159488,0.00041592226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942027,0.003933133,0.00009888624,0.00033467376,0.00086204836,0.00056856696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009099136,0.00011791061,0.00020152122,0.008643342,0.000769666,0.0020981287,0.00056671957,0.000118786,0.0003826091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016925957,0.00008348759,0.000016788206,0.043373536,0.00026485277,0.00052332174,0.000300081,0.00023911802,0.0000115466555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028235472,0.00006502819,0.38472736,0.000009213831,0.000023452585,0.000022063085,0.00018793427,0.0036194006,0.000108893895,0.078938045,0.302558,0.22971237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040557678,0.00011833983,0.6460845,0.0000073195133,0.000004447027,0.000023954102,0.00020180784,0.17185637,0.000041867625,0.0042217565,0.17680639,0.00022769623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0693258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2823538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2613571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006208172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009196811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602217918","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2017.03.104","title":"The Downside of the Shifting Paradigm of Scholarly Publishing in the Biomedical Sciences: Predatory Publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.1984503874392376,"score_gpt":0.4300402212220412,"score_spread":0.23158983378280362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602217918","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048648924,0.022113927,0.000023296268,0.0090270825,0.9163504,0.00032607096,0.00029266212,0.0000014870949,0.0032161023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756361,0.0015351048,0.00015518161,0.00022790769,0.022134583,0.0000054556567,0.000005104683,0.000020178515,0.00028035874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670146,0.0017430795,0.0030118427,0.00059853896,0.0266997,0.0009322113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3946655,0.5600786,0.017509839,0.0033819925,0.023370128,0.0009938899],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11973533,0.00026366112,0.0009450233,0.018024797,0.001581722,0.02892788,0.018869376,0.0009494837,0.00003983303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8835679,0.00011180926,0.00028149533,0.055711437,0.0019924312,0.0065529495,0.0019979437,0.0052420483,2.5247468e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045071824,0.000060570706,0.049975432,0.000026613687,0.000054301927,0.00014988781,0.00021944367,0.000019609744,0.0000019125173,0.00057534355,0.8694947,0.079417676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008749238,0.0002495236,0.13957782,0.000041998057,0.000029894589,0.00001346848,0.0015376883,0.00014850406,0.0000051164757,0.0052671526,0.85211474,0.00013917974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035094894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053712584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92698723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009840381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025971962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604604230","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2017.207","title":"Knowledge of journal impact factors among nursing faculty: a cross-sectional study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Polytechnic; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Nursing; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education","score_opus":0.4601951043661614,"score_gpt":0.6171331434327474,"score_spread":0.156938039066586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604604230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99093926,0.00016648072,0.00010444422,0.0018197754,0.003924839,0.0001218655,0.00003690643,0.00000451423,0.0028819225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424595,0.000036568992,0.00004694277,0.000022356597,0.0008254875,4.107677e-7,8.3672563e-7,0.00001040752,0.004811034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806018,0.0010162274,0.0018278203,0.0002115568,0.015941313,0.0004013249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846961,0.0049151685,0.005856457,0.00052136806,0.0031398886,0.00087104284],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037769865,0.0001445354,0.0005155172,0.008447684,0.0011776974,0.0061745774,0.0057033394,0.00024624748,0.002110694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17801642,0.00006822148,0.00084692833,0.013765109,0.00031782076,0.0038997151,0.0007028031,0.0013515045,0.000021193831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040805153,0.0006049441,0.9682225,0.0000011353734,0.00012679459,0.000011863577,0.0005015686,0.000015997577,0.000013778279,0.000018584922,0.024653796,0.0057882294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011118673,0.00031494597,0.9936208,0.000049887316,0.000016006317,0.00003844365,0.00036630692,0.00041311278,0.00011468324,0.002590714,0.0012894202,0.000073823176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001601821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002265921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14024656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044444465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014981203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604895157","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2104","title":"Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Commercialization; Vagueness; Public administration; Freedom of information; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.9468948604005198,"score_gpt":0.6709462950792823,"score_spread":0.27594856532123757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604895157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499938,0.012084626,0.0019208074,0.025926713,0.0001614486,0.00016775864,0.000007696194,0.000004760817,0.00973241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877113,0.009942224,0.0017891757,0.00026098493,0.000065870685,0.0000010499963,6.14867e-7,0.000007470123,0.00022129521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635005,0.0005214204,0.00068106863,0.00022950541,0.0019950652,0.00022289284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932629,0.0033065954,0.0012815106,0.00091692,0.00080946233,0.00042261413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024389861,0.00010595274,0.00031931224,0.008434123,0.0019793692,0.13906986,0.009499614,0.00016294823,0.000023249539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026407246,0.00007483061,0.000035493835,0.005038121,0.0005624656,0.047020186,0.007856622,0.0010624342,0.0000012382914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006230659,0.000021478796,0.9136091,0.0000071025875,0.000025967154,0.0000046089667,0.0017113866,0.0000012092248,0.00076172175,0.03300374,0.0023622855,0.048429128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008905741,0.000081396814,0.8724763,0.00012254732,0.0000128048605,0.00006234083,0.001873742,0.00039665136,0.00010901688,0.118315645,0.0055543194,0.0001046821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001614925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018311255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092049666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044929086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018178213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605532224","doi":"10.1007/s40596-016-0656-2","title":"Academic Productivity in Psychiatry: Benchmarks for the H-Index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Psychiatry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Context (archaeology); Benchmarking; Index (typography); Promotion (chess); Citation; Psychology; Productivity; Rank (graph theory); Medical education; Library science; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Management; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4300700536348611,"score_gpt":0.5780992450496059,"score_spread":0.14802919141474474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605532224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76324385,0.013635547,0.0038555851,0.1847014,0.024968762,0.0020386372,0.000089086985,0.00004660258,0.007420561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927009,0.0012002663,0.0009563612,0.0009313164,0.002145826,0.00015763269,0.000004036707,0.000027171984,0.001876525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903035,0.00022258692,0.0012381396,0.0014910925,0.0054890634,0.0012556063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991299,0.0036609452,0.0009864649,0.0029452797,0.0007308152,0.00037752304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038406327,0.00030775773,0.00047869506,0.013737993,0.0016371504,0.0012995614,0.011654835,0.0007196929,0.0002064552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045108773,0.0001875392,0.00030027863,0.029761406,0.0005664156,0.0014742209,0.0012655413,0.0029392513,0.0001325882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000634135,0.00005128215,0.7626251,0.000008281878,0.000013213469,3.0742592e-7,0.000054263583,0.000023350629,0.000042036118,0.007199569,0.16690585,0.06301334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083762873,0.00005765672,0.7413251,0.000029830064,0.0000098729815,0.000007458846,0.00031845263,0.0034587577,0.00002576595,0.18356983,0.07012423,0.00023541866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017522046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028034698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22945704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011019268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009364757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605809407","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.004","title":"Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Florida State University; City University of New York; University of Florida; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reputation; Negotiation; Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8869103465194283,"score_gpt":0.6618444333474954,"score_spread":0.22506591317193292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605809407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445164,0.00021384886,0.0012526793,0.02373023,0.00019529267,0.0013854253,0.00023358235,0.00003396585,0.028438572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426115,0.00041610145,0.004661378,0.00003282317,0.00004350064,0.00004222476,0.000036849873,0.0000058898613,0.0005000691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813762,0.0011414061,0.001127522,0.00086079125,0.014529205,0.0009648828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754445,0.005212285,0.0005574783,0.0021722107,0.01593872,0.00067482126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13820823,0.00011159412,0.0002319994,0.07011674,0.00255291,0.023567656,0.006243187,0.0001731418,0.00012220327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18196039,0.00008770692,0.000015401485,0.16933651,0.0028059762,0.07623565,0.004722185,0.0007252254,0.00007180213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011707703,0.000121167956,0.37528628,0.00008193944,0.000003531811,0.0000021878434,0.004422047,0.0000050640997,0.0028289182,0.07868018,0.009877276,0.52857435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007063819,0.00030365912,0.7748615,0.000048581947,0.000001596937,0.0000087387525,0.0064976476,0.14835626,0.005778087,0.02568237,0.037540324,0.00021481303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018657077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074881646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52835953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014376307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031476014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606235571","doi":"10.1186/s13742-016-0147-0-f","title":"Automatic extraction of academic collaborations in neuroimaging","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GigaScience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Computer science; Extraction (chemistry); Data science; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Chemistry; Psychology; Chromatography","score_opus":0.5944381460399508,"score_gpt":0.6029800787514076,"score_spread":0.008541932711456757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606235571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98375344,0.000121073506,0.011040674,0.0026184965,0.0003377526,0.00013200061,0.000009262607,0.00001606324,0.0019712357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812186,0.00009239544,0.0011011523,0.00005281965,0.000014874113,0.0000066354964,9.0871545e-8,0.0000029404011,0.00060723],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935879,0.00015645393,0.0006396765,0.00046366127,0.0047818045,0.00037052075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942276,0.003791206,0.00024873376,0.00046404044,0.0011081434,0.00016027219],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143781165,0.00006711669,0.00015533765,0.027151326,0.000102669655,0.00028676842,0.0016849615,0.00004895034,0.0003158183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04826321,0.00003836458,0.000038944454,0.17092937,0.0003316453,0.0015562654,0.0002478787,0.00013443503,0.0001849842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028601637,0.000045422825,0.2983263,0.0000021564888,5.856857e-7,0.000005105941,0.00013568423,0.000038103055,0.2883255,0.0018880909,0.0014084658,0.40982172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002965362,0.000059186314,0.94877636,0.000030903575,0.000001009468,0.000009228966,0.00025334323,0.021324234,0.015505826,0.01107083,0.0025704664,0.00010206703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027774571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017008959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65045005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008683061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033457816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606504748","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.009","title":"The emerging landscape of scientific publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Phenomenon; Data science; Process (computing); Position (finance); Scientific literature; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Epistemology; Business; Biology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.8899480221028856,"score_gpt":0.7157399398234091,"score_spread":0.17420808227947648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606504748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016200505,0.9813651,0.000013151308,0.0002950187,0.003186187,0.00021838947,0.0001273245,0.000014067236,0.0146188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045835442,0.98082656,0.00007273989,0.000008659906,0.0006223119,0.000013497044,0.00004294864,0.000019349953,0.017935557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983794,0.00056228763,0.003821375,0.0017633644,0.009264021,0.0007949641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93942076,0.04377617,0.004532288,0.006635928,0.004868058,0.0007668063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.121229865,0.0003080199,0.0018949119,0.009103589,0.0013329795,0.026823502,0.016593354,0.00086126797,0.00022418665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5011448,0.0001520021,0.0018465423,0.056691967,0.0019835867,0.00050883606,0.0037469927,0.001587124,0.00029464276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019784943,0.00004505579,0.00041133966,0.0003828856,0.000038418566,0.0000045849906,0.0000017108196,1.8541105e-8,7.7220204e-7,0.000028794828,0.096436694,0.90264773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010296065,0.000018355286,0.000048014936,0.0008594829,0.000051899515,0.000005368004,0.000031052878,0.00002999689,0.000016478018,0.0005596557,0.9980955,0.00018123364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000045886104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016382282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90246654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005131212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021027809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606849632","doi":"10.3390/data2020013","title":"Open Access Article Processing Charges (OA APC) Longitudinal Study 2016 Dataset","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Subject (documents); Computer science; Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Business model; World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; Accounting; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.955974598263469,"score_gpt":0.7534249884478179,"score_spread":0.20254960981565107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606849632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.923103,0.0011861405,0.004831912,0.009537771,0.0015170462,0.0026604342,0.044705052,0.00006522885,0.012393464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970634,0.00005313296,0.00047665325,0.00011112133,0.0001465011,0.000017530385,0.00093867775,0.000011223806,0.0011817467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137086,0.00017098826,0.0005620095,0.0015878113,0.005684681,0.00062366336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883916,0.00084950204,0.00049158686,0.008868758,0.0009725697,0.00042601264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029944496,0.00015261883,0.00032632737,0.008563331,0.0017310827,0.0882973,0.07266116,0.00005011958,0.0016053305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04489435,0.00009843582,0.000024505816,0.026363693,0.00022242645,0.019269064,0.07449153,0.0002244199,0.0016917343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018300228,0.00032653648,0.4682981,0.00000214672,0.0000093396175,0.00003320608,0.000021744929,4.090357e-7,0.000028351464,0.000021405494,0.38069135,0.15054913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067754945,0.00007600648,0.837412,0.000009098822,0.000010699488,0.0000041472413,0.00022864724,0.0048082205,0.0001054889,0.0010155636,0.15547436,0.0001782315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018548504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051905785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3691139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031812084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029951776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607340169","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916001086","title":"Journal Publishing and Marketing in an Age of Digital Media, Open Access and Impact Factors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publicity; Impact factor; Political science; Public relations; Politics; Position (finance); Bibliometrics; Library science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6632481603766792,"score_gpt":0.6183906463759615,"score_spread":0.04485751400071769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607340169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99475074,0.00009891107,0.000053207266,0.0015861513,0.0002989549,0.00005454562,0.00004903809,4.2097489e-7,0.0031080206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969167,0.0000114537925,0.00015631855,0.000039080955,0.000078694,9.654257e-8,2.4893873e-7,0.000003631057,0.000018803823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416494,0.00015746513,0.00072761416,0.00030341407,0.0035211695,0.0011254064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98584807,0.003226034,0.00062350184,0.00041713208,0.002681366,0.0072038798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046816647,0.00009942936,0.0003380715,0.026068812,0.0008583805,0.13179551,0.010560467,0.00006452515,0.0001324031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32863864,0.00006128563,0.000057022873,0.01569618,0.0022866146,0.031924795,0.0014017147,0.0004991267,5.605623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007393751,0.000010395573,0.9669194,0.000001188483,0.0000018340295,0.0001555201,0.00018502072,0.0000012416633,0.00008287815,0.004077557,0.00012341117,0.028434109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025077054,0.00010610788,0.97461724,0.00003264711,0.0000017440739,0.00015291024,0.000857285,0.00020808025,0.00004956795,0.023569068,0.000078320554,0.00007627243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027097179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019337557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.281822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035523693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046881433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607898736","doi":"10.29173/cjs28140","title":"Future Challenges and Opportunities in Academic Publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Digitization; Scientific communication; Public relations; Sociology; Electronic publishing; Open access publishing; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.8451116580711818,"score_gpt":0.5671079614588102,"score_spread":0.2780036966123717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607898736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69901305,0.038337238,0.0000036856563,0.25525117,0.0008023015,0.00003375097,0.000005206486,6.488984e-7,0.0065529654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861297,0.012473206,0.000021257638,0.00060793356,0.00046052563,5.3271606e-7,1.2532682e-7,0.0000032246548,0.00030350036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762046,0.00034902745,0.0004027601,0.00013702542,0.0011009445,0.00038979214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574757,0.001771293,0.0005080429,0.00034533383,0.0010495224,0.00057824445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034788135,0.000061834166,0.00022423477,0.0142485425,0.0007326367,0.0020917144,0.0033283918,0.00023489023,0.000084858584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030357152,0.00003391134,0.00005038999,0.0016990402,0.0012290194,0.001230836,0.00017113601,0.0010799031,0.0000058220608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009136941,0.0000036657189,0.1439185,0.000002513028,0.000016984837,0.00021946173,0.009866677,0.000002537889,0.000009536799,0.08563597,0.0167169,0.7435981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019183912,0.000052473337,0.7549673,0.000007393558,0.0000019058747,0.000098272474,0.010093808,0.000025430889,0.0000016363651,0.16238348,0.07213017,0.0000462978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024638507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042088635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74355185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105450184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013141696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608217342","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.02.746","title":"1019. The Association between Scholarly Impact and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Funding in Psychiatry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Psychiatry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Productivity; Procurement; Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Management; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8451718606742203,"score_gpt":0.6531907697458212,"score_spread":0.1919810909283991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608217342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95515126,0.004338062,0.000023801793,0.034458183,0.0014516071,0.00032494296,0.00007763299,0.0000063461302,0.004168176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841595,0.00047694327,0.00048721684,0.00019603167,0.00028570672,0.0000062631602,0.0000042097986,0.0000048177494,0.0001228867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925905,0.0012618947,0.0008422856,0.0006258644,0.0035563868,0.0011231053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933887,0.003385904,0.0005946003,0.0009374387,0.0010635352,0.0006298189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09213294,0.00013381425,0.00041897484,0.0155483745,0.0018404252,0.0035987606,0.0030497138,0.00030596188,0.00007148435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06952303,0.00006647746,0.00012784373,0.025327541,0.00043338168,0.00078996405,0.00058995787,0.0009726408,0.000059224185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008120649,0.000039000493,0.95789325,0.0000032737983,0.0000135109385,3.4794056e-7,0.000033742945,7.486865e-7,0.00000865773,0.0033018312,0.00862248,0.030075043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027290446,0.00027716384,0.95175457,0.000021873444,0.0000011670902,7.3065615e-7,0.0002924557,0.00002329372,0.0000012898249,0.040919196,0.0063575674,0.00007776113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059260152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047853697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043264676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005109099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021583026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612064989","doi":"10.1186/s40634-017-0090-8","title":"The rate of publication of free papers at the 2008 and 2010 European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congresses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre; McGill University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Medicine; Impact factor; Sports medicine; Presentation (obstetrics); Arthroscopy; MEDLINE; Observational study; Orthopedic surgery; General surgery; Physical therapy; Surgery; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.25898981263820664,"score_gpt":0.4708629947709106,"score_spread":0.21187318213270395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612064989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98382205,0.012484373,0.000018782735,0.0019044272,0.00054882513,0.00009466852,0.00002075692,0.000001085782,0.0011050303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119806,0.008235713,0.00018364235,0.00005089471,0.000037582035,7.531274e-7,6.488351e-7,0.0000067188475,0.0002859867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960449,0.00026159734,0.0011056492,0.00018041405,0.0022076461,0.00019982681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169093,0.0033183135,0.0026506425,0.0006451509,0.0015337681,0.00016119663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016833445,0.00009893766,0.0003832324,0.0017845604,0.0004613462,0.00036780653,0.0009869008,0.000055525554,0.00010506216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009827136,0.00004853657,0.00023463089,0.003270423,0.0018988694,0.00037077066,0.00066282315,0.0001661427,7.06368e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018281201,0.00013543521,0.85005873,0.000013311612,0.00007741427,0.0000107088,0.0005616529,0.0000014181786,0.041719336,0.0002431641,0.06796718,0.03902882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000995792,0.00032232332,0.9002093,0.000047700752,0.000018414183,0.00012951223,0.002665835,0.00010417346,0.080061935,0.00034738032,0.015001497,0.00009614851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002168814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007874979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052965682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017512399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013639577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612430136","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300","title":"Citation analysis of scientific categories","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics; Data science; Management science; Computer science; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6441124752737633,"score_gpt":0.5944176859984289,"score_spread":0.04969478927533433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612430136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98432964,0.0006037446,0.0023894252,0.00038837132,0.0006888342,0.000066626126,0.00003420935,0.0000073464303,0.011491819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941343,0.00010996295,0.00034158764,0.00001058733,0.000021280994,0.000002482958,0.0000067389415,0.000002730452,0.005370296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259555,0.00007908608,0.00043249954,0.00045090204,0.0061891796,0.00025275297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303037,0.0011108395,0.00046367105,0.0015637423,0.0036843955,0.0001469886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015472711,0.0000634044,0.000258542,0.08282517,0.0008116148,0.0056994115,0.0023314862,0.000053699172,0.00062418333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04375732,0.000043807046,0.00018763715,0.15516889,0.00045757086,0.0007202626,0.00041818246,0.000072394134,0.00022476728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012457194,0.00007561713,0.88144785,0.000011887694,0.000106499945,0.0000034653024,0.00031886724,0.00010126587,0.0066226735,0.005738004,0.0017809104,0.1037805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000979785,0.000029840869,0.9808281,0.000004095861,0.00004417051,1.7191998e-7,0.00016865358,0.0034946261,0.004764372,0.0033118748,0.0071936846,0.00006242489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085040796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017727319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10371808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028462446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100598234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612545723","doi":"10.18520/cs/v106/i11/1490-1499","title":"Global Research Output of Nanobiotechnology Research: a Scientometrics Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Scopus; Index (typography); Citation impact; Nanobiotechnology; Bibliometrics; China; Library science; Regional science; Citation; Political science; Geography; Social science; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.917201976812686,"score_gpt":0.7366759240880296,"score_spread":0.18052605272465638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612545723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781824,0.0010278876,0.004861598,0.0006045963,0.0024019682,0.0009780593,0.000026659503,0.000053694417,0.011863162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887735,0.000089927395,0.00050524314,0.000009310007,0.00009239728,0.00003197371,6.089479e-7,0.000009138764,0.00038407312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9220263,0.0029270519,0.001687167,0.0032167234,0.0666076,0.0035351645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417344,0.012510653,0.00044373344,0.0042262278,0.039639927,0.0014450874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38638917,0.0002302704,0.0005831538,0.24414033,0.0021629967,0.0036582432,0.018898204,0.00016833014,0.000115160816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4188998,0.00016333931,0.0001488885,0.79062915,0.011337834,0.001199007,0.009233982,0.0012915956,0.00086941605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018609706,0.0014472725,0.3266009,0.000009258584,0.00000349576,0.0000036508861,0.000387664,0.00003176046,0.0009226622,0.028239256,0.0051706745,0.6371648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015283502,0.003961576,0.7413724,0.000057071928,0.0000065126583,0.000014955832,0.005747127,0.021724142,0.0037430204,0.11459398,0.10669308,0.00055779616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020203096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041274547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.636607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008330664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002007173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613650556","doi":"10.1002/asi.23903","title":"Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gratitude; Value (mathematics); Scopus; Context (archaeology); Scientific communication; Data science; Coding (social sciences); Scientific literature; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Political science; History; Psychology; MEDLINE; Social psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.5109254855075547,"score_gpt":0.5932061808176325,"score_spread":0.08228069531007787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613650556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783127,0.00023526518,0.0005529879,0.013218629,0.0006882209,0.0004035544,0.00005759289,0.000004237131,0.0065268115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986431,0.00015107833,0.00087387685,0.000014211308,0.000012203691,0.000009677878,5.689322e-8,0.0000011731526,0.00029464497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99096525,0.00008615297,0.0009716555,0.00010686396,0.0076129683,0.000257123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568256,0.0031530638,0.0038002767,0.0005396482,0.03560794,0.00007343929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07474312,0.00005328876,0.00032393006,0.02788345,0.00090909883,0.0008912285,0.004064382,0.00012113687,0.000010975163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38785347,0.000027978827,0.00013562331,0.03630217,0.0010048202,0.0035349457,0.0008051582,0.00021885907,0.0000053923527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008569846,0.00020355478,0.5491168,0.00004873302,0.0004945219,2.987627e-7,0.0015345332,0.000041607225,0.009047388,0.09701805,0.025059665,0.31734917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015323369,0.000727586,0.3794347,0.00007159776,0.00020202504,0.000013773292,0.005644301,0.002405068,0.3680828,0.16168886,0.08001574,0.00018121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012768045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008114893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3590354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017683035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006088139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614250894","doi":"10.1017/cem.2017.292","title":"P090: Electronic invitations received from predatory journals and fraudulent conferences: a 6-month young researcher experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7878409052410476,"score_gpt":0.6192272024603012,"score_spread":0.1686137027807464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614250894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95667076,0.019795587,0.0010524465,0.010035476,0.0044592507,0.0001794096,0.00006960619,0.000002650242,0.007734807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917496,0.007660354,0.00011661266,0.00007020566,0.00048768902,0.00000487886,0.000002088586,0.000010559822,0.0024726468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992141,0.00037342546,0.0013618806,0.00041564606,0.0048790774,0.0008289559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882356,0.0010353081,0.0011309906,0.0008618901,0.0061387545,0.0025974552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017419888,0.00016894126,0.00047895825,0.016250886,0.0011746588,0.00085107185,0.0033552465,0.00012721059,0.014971434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10298875,0.000111382564,0.000114878116,0.01051812,0.00074354646,0.0014994697,0.0001275213,0.0008056552,0.000025706047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004724366,0.000037755664,0.8527345,0.000006602495,0.00010288267,0.00014070388,0.0075927405,0.0000099209055,0.0014309387,0.0009569249,0.10774919,0.0291906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086947664,0.000575665,0.8126033,0.0001266091,0.00001922927,0.000016864062,0.0073647704,0.00049940427,0.00007655428,0.037642166,0.14002438,0.00018161233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031471968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07372863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08556886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002192199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031178168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948991},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2615266562","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/nox053","title":"Citation classics in neuro-oncology: assessment of historical trends and scientific progress","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuro-Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Oncology; Radiation therapy; Clinical trial; Citation analysis; MEDLINE; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4991945846804617,"score_gpt":0.58779065215596,"score_spread":0.08859606747549836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615266562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549634,0.0005693853,0.0004224486,0.017210925,0.0053565027,0.0003915476,0.000023221732,0.00002512559,0.021037435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968285,0.00012430408,0.0020936022,0.00013934076,0.00009646772,0.000040435072,0.0000039472507,0.000014345828,0.0006590426],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172693,0.0009514581,0.001121116,0.0012252671,0.0042826016,0.0006926067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884263,0.0071696173,0.0011196786,0.0012501978,0.001611764,0.0004224417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016850647,0.00019380555,0.0007165135,0.035377312,0.00063921505,0.0015419619,0.002493807,0.0003322177,0.00010278773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027149508,0.00015259995,0.0001256901,0.036332518,0.0013833124,0.00071889436,0.0013052735,0.00067269447,0.000020743868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056204193,0.00050945836,0.29938358,0.0000060596813,0.0000050907292,0.00010578696,0.00020880812,0.000009192051,0.01939146,0.0013281165,0.02043296,0.6585633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013328519,0.0017727611,0.48640075,0.000003872222,0.00000993553,0.000027978822,0.00008676101,0.008626755,0.0003313807,0.00183579,0.49943537,0.00013579537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058186848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022743683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6584275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010846553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011083011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615456822","doi":"10.29173/cais937","title":"Forty-Six Years Young: A Checkup for the Canadian Association for Information Science","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Library science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.17905958010432857,"score_gpt":0.4138772447122529,"score_spread":0.23481766460792433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615456822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91749674,0.00078979024,0.0012682562,0.054866467,0.0034587795,0.0032233912,0.004334141,0.000024547766,0.0145379165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113,0.00041707297,0.0007573707,0.0002587251,0.00015901028,0.0001157224,0.00000256411,0.000013441184,0.007146106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925351,0.000030329724,0.000980075,0.0004621689,0.004736285,0.0012560107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68861777,0.0046196464,0.002129503,0.00044663297,0.30356073,0.00062574097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024838341,0.00023947931,0.00043930733,0.0092378585,0.0008924526,0.020579612,0.0064590406,0.00031523252,0.000050577626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47924843,0.00013431029,0.0003435841,0.029732442,0.0014099287,0.030354315,0.0008296255,0.00024578642,0.000019235906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019302547,0.000109928675,0.5135308,0.00020293372,0.00012870134,2.128531e-7,0.016664825,0.000005125086,0.0044849603,0.0841132,0.056664236,0.32390204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009345425,0.0003821605,0.30219975,0.00016081096,0.00006978509,0.0000066714383,0.0020772188,0.001956778,0.007666965,0.011207468,0.6730932,0.00024464796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01410909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059677465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011237907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046637338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615767977","doi":"10.1111/jan.13338","title":"Research publication performance of Australian Professors of Nursing &amp; Midwifery","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Nursing research; Excellence; Watson; Discipline; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Nursing; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Medical education; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.6841241292454829,"score_gpt":0.6721515447596926,"score_spread":0.011972584485790305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615767977","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22329538,0.0024797232,0.0003789004,0.002597746,0.76320994,0.0005417267,0.000111027104,0.000008635805,0.0073769023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.561138,0.0044504944,0.0184176,0.0000057429966,0.38646752,0.000010104974,0.00005662303,0.00012417979,0.029329753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96690094,0.0008001492,0.0030412315,0.00064955023,0.027642095,0.0009660367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93320906,0.009296704,0.006818267,0.001624443,0.048563465,0.0004880403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05761856,0.0002858917,0.0012960933,0.076179974,0.0005591463,0.0012376555,0.0059855618,0.000788839,0.000100780104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1508276,0.00021664982,0.00044280296,0.05206124,0.0014008003,0.0026894563,0.00023027514,0.0031212626,0.000022449432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043693767,0.0003773463,0.0003550013,0.00007675399,0.00002499904,0.0000030032754,0.00045339292,0.00014273584,0.0023595453,0.000021989448,0.70285606,0.29289222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017341851,0.0020533907,0.00833142,0.009216441,0.000070035596,0.000035319845,0.0030804065,0.00021943914,0.011849721,0.0063993093,0.95654637,0.00046397976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009811658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023146329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37674245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010129521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002679626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616004446","doi":"","title":"Supporting Knowledge Mobilization and Research Impact Strategies in Grant Applications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Scholarship; Citation impact; Political science; Social research; Citation; Public relations; Grantsmanship; Sociology; Social science; Public administration; Library science; Higher education","score_opus":0.7008402576772212,"score_gpt":0.7181724566775245,"score_spread":0.01733219900030325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616004446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703491,0.0013309028,0.02213247,0.0024608357,0.00008357134,0.00058188476,0.000014960243,0.000006197168,0.0030401105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768966,0.0008442994,0.000522421,0.0000023476086,0.00018147392,0.000027487697,0.0000013050739,0.000008848487,0.00072215346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847255,0.0018953036,0.001441766,0.00046811346,0.010565464,0.0009038725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96715313,0.014238603,0.00047200613,0.0004994877,0.016953545,0.00068325055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1332318,0.00010393059,0.00027382252,0.051070694,0.0003693711,0.0025955727,0.0012087199,0.0001267897,0.00021358884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05246375,0.000055990553,0.00009869773,0.07561777,0.00058423827,0.0020177003,0.0002857632,0.0007195262,0.00007069752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046424722,0.0009336033,0.25292146,0.000047076872,0.00002528691,0.000117056516,0.00091986824,0.000030308596,0.07278461,0.0135339275,0.00959731,0.64862525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028301436,0.007101149,0.5868688,0.00029287636,0.0000061465416,0.00036915857,0.014621141,0.0027636697,0.017686486,0.33560076,0.03149206,0.00036760635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036220437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017382998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6482576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040980944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031060954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843985},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2618646793","doi":"10.29173/cais967","title":"Research Activities and Networks in CAIS Conferences for the Period of 1993- 2015: Social Network Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Social network analysis; Collaborative network; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2774019072057237,"score_gpt":0.47295419358311347,"score_spread":0.19555228637738975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618646793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895305,0.00092379906,0.00060692144,0.006338261,0.00014370737,0.00055798603,0.00023671944,0.0000076247334,0.0016544504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820036,0.00072370627,0.00015437599,0.000030457302,0.0001389597,0.00005845385,0.000001027774,0.000011577646,0.0006810874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935076,0.00018728757,0.0009926253,0.0005949991,0.0038376967,0.0008797618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86607486,0.013299635,0.0013975967,0.0004682127,0.118524596,0.00023507838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02268174,0.00022572503,0.0008578524,0.008355631,0.0004589211,0.0055583166,0.004472664,0.00022801703,0.0000693464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10738127,0.00010968991,0.00033948052,0.04162525,0.0023380793,0.0047790287,0.0016905175,0.00038174234,8.0865186e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036822032,0.00011426764,0.9097484,0.000053861688,0.0002743293,4.7070787e-7,0.008531362,0.000050221814,0.0013652691,0.015250809,0.009671543,0.054571267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093531114,0.0004761443,0.93100446,0.0001344463,0.00014316344,0.000004044319,0.01501196,0.006377573,0.00291297,0.021139156,0.021573449,0.0002872976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007447277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029213692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12743275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069558555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005461084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621224786","doi":"","title":"Profil de la production scientifique du Gouvernement fédéral canadien","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.26061314343054093,"score_gpt":0.4888830199265101,"score_spread":0.2282698764959692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621224786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71220857,0.0017792208,0.00091166346,0.016841695,0.0032887417,0.00057914946,0.000040772597,0.00004140876,0.26430878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47148916,0.0014081374,0.0022980596,0.00021733335,0.00039032975,0.00002704373,0.0000031800394,0.000013514103,0.52415323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98861635,0.0010525283,0.0006977356,0.0012860799,0.0068733287,0.0014739673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943991,0.0013849933,0.00012884436,0.0008613247,0.0021139125,0.0011118829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04470195,0.00023512339,0.00027761093,0.024755577,0.00075074536,0.0045282743,0.0020213416,0.00025978338,0.0481699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014881524,0.00018712084,0.00017261945,0.15583317,0.0010239695,0.0010287759,0.00035860194,0.00044055446,0.0031421147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019266678,0.00039535345,0.051332798,0.000017933797,0.000017407834,0.00006874825,0.00046809547,0.0003092987,0.00032466408,0.0046872,0.33064103,0.6117182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003683124,0.00015223036,0.057129722,0.0000360496,0.000013422674,0.00014322612,0.00047691903,0.014370403,0.00449731,0.0045907213,0.9179111,0.00031058624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020470321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040195966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61140764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001446196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99763405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621257984","doi":"10.1177/0162243916687038","title":"Managing Ambiguities at the Edge of Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Scholarship; Agency (philosophy); Bureaucracy; Legitimacy; Portfolio; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Ethnography; Political science; Public relations; Business; Marketing; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.44149464514655984,"score_gpt":0.5586162204709909,"score_spread":0.11712157532443107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621257984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488768,0.0015092551,0.00071915705,0.006840308,0.0005064438,0.00019017643,0.000009943131,0.00011045743,0.04123748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97407544,0.00012593024,0.00018351639,0.000034443055,0.000039081508,0.000014470465,1.2814903e-7,0.000007519143,0.025519455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923757,0.00013003599,0.000646813,0.0009264279,0.0050410316,0.0008800205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929577,0.0020861335,0.00032391908,0.0018753525,0.0026025437,0.00015433013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028953478,0.00015534334,0.00030405453,0.070204295,0.0022172264,0.0004854493,0.00857462,0.000120717115,0.00066790957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01972961,0.00006841431,0.00012011993,0.17558312,0.021120094,0.0006786698,0.004246518,0.00018406672,0.00076678867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005501808,0.00009469543,0.076471195,0.0000046042137,0.000010184202,0.0000045636207,0.0004991794,0.00000198434,0.2595976,0.14330207,0.013480096,0.5065283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036339264,0.0002886095,0.056548756,0.00003971889,0.0000071250033,0.000016778158,0.0023339055,0.00015863162,0.28144464,0.629394,0.0291677,0.00023672683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018648258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034893666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023674939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002490266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621368193","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Research Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada – Phase II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phase (matter); Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6370560247470263,"score_gpt":0.6432071427948152,"score_spread":0.006151118047788895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621368193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96911174,0.0010453301,0.0005235225,0.0054189516,0.00021968714,0.00021331797,0.000585024,0.000005899469,0.022876525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896784,0.00024732307,0.00009474323,0.00024623782,0.000027649485,0.000006720967,0.000017407823,0.0000028683837,0.009678654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96910065,0.00024596226,0.0010314509,0.00051309174,0.0285052,0.0006036432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97604793,0.004798082,0.00034995246,0.00059093325,0.017877629,0.00033548707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0376881,0.00010829115,0.00044109634,0.78679794,0.00043554942,0.00037227487,0.0030152507,0.000072770184,0.0036888004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043604385,0.000058906084,0.00018332654,0.9798586,0.00038704727,0.0004463542,0.00038279564,0.00026612816,0.000003877541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004167039,0.0006906658,0.026148407,0.0000024181104,0.0002767001,0.000002944744,0.000051596504,0.0005782985,0.0068828054,0.0015588945,0.80212355,0.16164204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016530533,0.00097361254,0.6484593,0.0000072074813,0.00010644754,0.0000018787727,0.0003885732,0.046501864,0.032083135,0.003449995,0.26609594,0.00027900457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27801377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11589402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6223109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027427424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003384273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621569939","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.003","title":"The Top 100 Most-Cited Articles in Stroke Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Medicine; Web of science; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Neuroimaging; MEDLINE; Medical physics; Library science; Meta-analysis; Pathology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.6362674060047658,"score_gpt":0.6025859043510968,"score_spread":0.03368150165366901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621569939","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095861923,0.99354494,0.000576391,0.00023542777,0.0021864842,0.0018077779,0.00019338878,0.000025460411,0.00047151212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050552217,0.9936576,0.000048216414,0.000013532988,0.00018882363,0.0006138681,0.000077992976,0.000034265177,0.00031048493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335034,0.0027429136,0.0042088735,0.0022544733,0.005346291,0.002097094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8433625,0.14836209,0.0023862938,0.0036993835,0.0016141558,0.0005755674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04853429,0.0006916027,0.0036517812,0.80621904,0.0005496649,0.004712285,0.010271579,0.00047250616,0.00021533541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.453335,0.000394975,0.0010690042,0.88945484,0.00096025923,0.00055663765,0.0020522187,0.0019341498,0.00036729308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021086898,0.00018505762,0.23133217,0.00016710022,0.00011405786,0.000038256756,0.000019838704,0.000099136094,3.3255663e-8,0.00015842449,0.0041066436,0.7637772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004448441,0.00005736183,0.09114115,0.000761083,0.00029374537,0.000018490551,0.000016431693,0.0019332623,8.29777e-8,0.003207765,0.90168524,0.00044055388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021283331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026513194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057229574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009875259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622802656","doi":"","title":"Cloaked journal referees: Esteemed goalkeepers of the scholarly world","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Soundings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.5860515591738229,"score_gpt":0.5498680750643498,"score_spread":0.03618348410947314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622802656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931501,0.00057323783,0.00053759344,0.0009354507,0.001633637,0.00015404618,0.0000053208764,0.0000095494615,0.0646502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973659,0.00005421235,0.00089560455,0.0002071638,0.000059853424,0.0000023643197,1.5747399e-7,0.00001007903,0.025111571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883604,0.00050661445,0.00077360385,0.00039464116,0.009405209,0.0005595347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228585,0.0025659523,0.00053831044,0.0008730405,0.0033529964,0.00038387004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034321684,0.00012549425,0.00026791284,0.02831495,0.0005902731,0.0048377654,0.0031555095,0.00008412446,0.001205335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10356983,0.00006681252,0.00028534676,0.17242654,0.00029382345,0.0012517798,0.00030851667,0.0007224249,0.00020160481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003382949,0.00017649129,0.8419129,0.0000067714873,0.00004980487,0.000010174503,0.00085870805,0.000023950386,0.007768369,0.073686324,0.05378951,0.02168315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011219288,0.00014916933,0.19173609,0.000037702335,0.000016286936,0.00007410477,0.002666534,0.00006882843,0.0060867025,0.14753255,0.65023977,0.00027035765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022183269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002663813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6501768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000170091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035500896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624878181","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.002","title":"Predicting the age of researchers using bibliometric data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Proxy (statistics); Linear regression; Statistics; Regression analysis; Linear model; Predictive modelling; Regression; Computer science; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9265886468305123,"score_gpt":0.6788366096396239,"score_spread":0.24775203719088845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624878181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97202164,0.0032995353,0.011462543,0.00074799673,0.0016024617,0.00022597738,0.00009184606,0.0000049184064,0.010543075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991174,0.001995039,0.006082259,0.00005390812,0.00030438654,3.2638633e-7,0.0000019015642,0.0000125059,0.00037567844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759151,0.00023794973,0.0023295966,0.0003254248,0.020500913,0.0006910502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94990224,0.02102988,0.006678452,0.005444531,0.016290773,0.00065410975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.121967174,0.0001547612,0.0005692417,0.53863,0.0009983619,0.0065729124,0.021457842,0.00015282328,0.00011422231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.587162,0.00008024789,0.00027559837,0.67729837,0.00067360053,0.0048652748,0.0052293884,0.00096058304,0.00002042498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051026127,0.00008953251,0.64308447,0.000015217658,0.00006979349,0.000060864546,0.00012445301,0.00017931337,0.00036428694,0.00010244322,0.010309351,0.3455493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010566734,0.00052354345,0.90057963,0.000054961165,0.000041703777,0.00015292803,0.0013717499,0.03288492,0.00064295804,0.0016581863,0.06085078,0.00018196274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002959062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010978725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46519488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015883385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010531151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625074894","doi":"10.29173/cais942","title":"Citation Distance: Measuring Knowledge Translation, Integration, Diffusion &amp; Scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scope (computer science); Similarity (geometry); Humanities; Computer science; Library science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4114400887591147,"score_gpt":0.4456787272752897,"score_spread":0.03423863851617498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625074894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738307,0.0006765311,0.008605296,0.0027577605,0.0002937071,0.00037335706,0.0001264849,0.000028153909,0.013307984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962008,0.0004243834,0.0009094485,0.00002878639,0.00007467668,0.000019364454,0.000002095311,0.000014864459,0.0023255777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412566,0.00008072451,0.0010057201,0.00055407296,0.003773806,0.00046001934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75542855,0.002793387,0.0013472681,0.0005010181,0.23959477,0.00033500316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008389613,0.00022460321,0.0004394991,0.006807954,0.00025910034,0.00608739,0.0034222587,0.0001581842,0.00013140854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25176358,0.000119084994,0.0002171495,0.02587896,0.0005189745,0.011536972,0.00056368904,0.00020405152,0.00003190094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018370294,0.0002589123,0.3125277,0.0000891388,0.000035207886,2.5489967e-7,0.019811645,0.0000019235956,0.20168899,0.012841264,0.008259954,0.4443013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017620861,0.0003504902,0.6005086,0.0008686043,0.00004947884,0.000011464337,0.0032054626,0.000937911,0.12358808,0.05435689,0.21377324,0.00058771815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056336616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060613114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4437136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118341435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625269005","doi":"10.11613/bm.2017.030","title":"Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Biochemia Medica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misrepresentation; Publication; Deception; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8941266353903872,"score_gpt":0.7234011886426125,"score_spread":0.17072544674777468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625269005","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004736704,0.986076,0.000010179408,0.0036089418,0.0010241547,0.00042522707,0.000053465552,0.0000141214905,0.0087405285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00015788719,0.99620396,0.00021745147,0.00014188256,0.0006053997,0.000053887503,0.000020646146,0.000027103813,0.0025717737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97414494,0.0012904904,0.0028346505,0.001552011,0.019021869,0.0011560329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98189145,0.011271578,0.001624653,0.0025475118,0.0015628216,0.0011019926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13731451,0.0003975683,0.002532168,0.10388776,0.00016857551,0.0122657,0.011879207,0.0031140286,0.0014357077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.522408,0.00025519493,0.0005101176,0.10748568,0.00045094022,0.0011257179,0.0024964858,0.006580627,0.00045156002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017311396,0.000050113067,0.0005362217,0.0005061114,0.000010077409,0.00014563883,0.00004652319,2.3850621e-8,6.428021e-7,0.000031173855,0.13955136,0.85912037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024894398,0.000020427404,0.00034369357,0.0062706615,0.000010893876,0.000022708253,0.00004853031,0.000019195215,0.000005418361,0.00087728817,0.9918603,0.00027198554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021032494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006388654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8588484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005455957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031797516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999005},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2625746381","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Finding Theses and Dissertations: Borrowing & Purchasing Copies of Theses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Purchasing; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.7845677185182496,"score_gpt":0.6516716903515569,"score_spread":0.13289602816669266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625746381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27229935,0.06758524,0.005156408,0.01162722,0.0035955962,0.0024739231,0.00093832635,0.00019756271,0.6361264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282741,0.015791345,0.0043667266,0.00010154224,0.00054211344,0.0000686028,0.000022652977,0.00008955623,0.15074341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97711694,0.0010557852,0.0018487223,0.0014488001,0.017261362,0.0012683969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8962997,0.09063607,0.0007240389,0.0016106297,0.010226333,0.0005032364],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055261713,0.00038217116,0.0010053656,0.117203765,0.00093918643,0.0048659486,0.004271897,0.00046897773,0.0016664268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22743885,0.00020836949,0.00027304658,0.108926944,0.0013158428,0.0012209219,0.0022536127,0.0007682227,0.0001671698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066288645,0.0001680554,0.043461114,0.00025079274,0.00016377773,0.000038257687,0.001981025,0.0000052717514,0.0034777708,0.023947094,0.3868635,0.53957707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082843506,0.00073242234,0.02923923,0.0025962985,0.00004566047,0.000030884923,0.044513546,0.0005989708,0.014853725,0.1559014,0.74940544,0.0012540059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009874946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016846383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5559747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001484261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081703736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625867801","doi":"10.22054/jks.2017.15975.1109","title":"تحلیل سطوح همکاری علمی پژوهشگران ایرانی در پایگاه وبآوساینس : مطالعه موردی حوزه علوم اجتماعی","year":2017,"lang":"fa","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9040632922854434,"score_gpt":0.7788238502099075,"score_spread":0.12523944207553583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625867801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75010365,0.10787422,0.001688363,0.0050363154,0.013538177,0.0027041794,0.000993562,0.00010907715,0.11795247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860117,0.08655448,0.00075065374,0.00069397816,0.0013484285,0.00007719669,0.00002082351,0.00019338478,0.024349324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95949304,0.002147765,0.005413886,0.0038110588,0.025387056,0.003747215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607764,0.00928982,0.007826619,0.0075134,0.010548275,0.004045511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05968623,0.0016142013,0.0038911253,0.096535295,0.0059115333,0.11013452,0.06540544,0.0010837434,0.10133716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07326969,0.0013164525,0.0017912807,0.110549346,0.0025524232,0.01976638,0.025056206,0.0032451397,0.0028045126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039648748,0.0010547175,0.46792054,0.0001038165,0.00037103516,0.0004191815,0.00022896964,0.00007108144,0.010132997,0.0002936201,0.2928797,0.22612786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019285785,0.0001043629,0.7298442,0.0006707889,0.00016054942,0.00005800306,0.00034349976,0.0013350329,0.010428249,0.015091876,0.23851162,0.0015232533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006504484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003867186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26192367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007948716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025222397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2637192718","doi":"10.29173/cais796","title":"Field Delineation or Field Delimitation for Mapping Sciences?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Humanities; Field (mathematics); Cartography; Mathematics; Geography; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.3781392262104905,"score_gpt":0.4635077816635726,"score_spread":0.08536855545308208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2637192718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334143,0.0010739194,0.011428955,0.04497501,0.001246859,0.0012972881,0.00012274951,0.00002043409,0.0064204866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793034,0.00065450766,0.009107888,0.000933461,0.00020785574,0.00008640454,0.0000023847247,0.000015697473,0.009688381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938397,0.000061887025,0.0012618705,0.00068577833,0.003290891,0.0008599167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59482616,0.013665008,0.0027623982,0.0005614881,0.3875901,0.0005948518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008486948,0.00029094453,0.00056550704,0.0074624075,0.0004839351,0.016506435,0.004621718,0.0003658376,0.00054472254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45229617,0.0001935985,0.00031551643,0.031065648,0.0006857558,0.018573375,0.001106855,0.0003605104,0.000028176291],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025454798,0.00029388862,0.1592393,0.0005140385,0.000075589574,6.1531983e-7,0.010798726,0.00002856574,0.00976738,0.01735566,0.116055064,0.6856166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025282027,0.008046529,0.11941344,0.0016373346,0.00017546891,0.00006136012,0.029333897,0.1465895,0.12568778,0.08673533,0.47849405,0.0012970939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012099609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034252684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6843195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099532874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000950206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2639113251","doi":"10.1057/s41292-017-0053-4","title":"Mapping Global Health: A network analysis of a heterogeneous publication domain","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioSocieties","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; National Institutes of Health; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; UNICEF; Eli Lilly and Company; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Scientometrics; Citation; Bibliometrics; Metadata; Data science; Publishing; Citation analysis; Domain (mathematical analysis); Field (mathematics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.48707373986587904,"score_gpt":0.5695464090099026,"score_spread":0.08247266914402357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2639113251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943481,0.004780014,0.017986115,0.02210916,0.0008264248,0.0003636565,0.00028024137,0.00004552814,0.010127804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955656,0.00024863268,0.0030700243,0.0003713357,0.000086017164,0.0000072584626,0.000009647043,0.0000035415608,0.0006379535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357575,0.0001815961,0.0007068953,0.00049255806,0.004528432,0.00051473855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946039,0.0006208497,0.0010134135,0.0014190687,0.0020921377,0.00025063753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015296023,0.000105090694,0.00045711896,0.009979141,0.0008841169,0.0030086043,0.0027417103,0.00009654227,0.00021606566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010017361,0.00007778694,0.00042951427,0.10235176,0.00032453454,0.00035696544,0.0007967266,0.00008036378,0.000043923756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001334206,0.00009975759,0.74323523,0.00000974721,0.0005359661,0.0000019438794,0.00064674945,0.00029588738,0.00008525235,0.0046410067,0.13952878,0.110906355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019754084,0.00008269696,0.9257044,0.000006925281,0.000020251606,0.0000015392862,0.0006454257,0.006227797,0.000038857812,0.016741863,0.050197095,0.00013560346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034700823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001264561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1824692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016742804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000233765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660520211","doi":"","title":"Impact Beyond Citation: An Introduction to Altmetrics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2453686155132267,"score_gpt":0.4464203354055481,"score_spread":0.2010517198923214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660520211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115348,0.000044669978,0.026646249,0.00563403,0.00036193035,0.0005717807,0.000118178854,0.000028568304,0.055059824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691631,0.00009025016,0.010879099,0.000068894886,0.00009654619,4.5368434e-8,0.00003611925,0.000010336955,0.019655596],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936916,0.0003982187,0.00032382598,0.0009598195,0.004125139,0.0005013473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187976,0.0010195379,0.0005451054,0.0012817704,0.0044297194,0.0008441107],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007472658,0.00020837202,0.00064386724,0.024699587,0.0005996706,0.0004860973,0.005493797,0.00018896266,0.011431241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003606512,0.00022448746,0.00027500765,0.0667345,0.0003701533,0.0030271856,0.0018526991,0.00024923554,0.00026028187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013822594,0.0009718539,0.038798474,0.000024001469,0.0002060238,0.00004727706,0.005414996,0.0020552394,0.0039721737,0.009081407,0.3406257,0.5974206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003713251,0.003511726,0.3829951,0.000018611061,0.00012886513,0.000014949592,0.028062485,0.009177312,0.00040243735,0.0036003906,0.5675561,0.0008188178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004897485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011004013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5966018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000270659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039635412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660852010","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004","title":"Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Open research; Gold standard (test); Citation impact; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.8704276285011111,"score_gpt":0.6422364638488748,"score_spread":0.22819116465223632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660852010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729984,0.0022059283,0.00018982691,0.014044317,0.00023438201,0.00020703772,0.000011551309,0.000001967888,0.010106633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712116,0.0012351519,0.000058128426,0.0001179297,0.00026634053,6.486191e-7,5.8869706e-8,0.000008542472,0.0011920728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936311,0.00069574267,0.0009396191,0.0001814704,0.0042033335,0.00034873263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881222,0.0073282393,0.0021488974,0.0011044609,0.0009748852,0.00032131825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05795656,0.00011823864,0.0003776174,0.006742869,0.00056171976,0.008236693,0.032161273,0.00012947332,0.000151574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036045738,0.000043298354,0.0001710421,0.015083974,0.00051628717,0.008460115,0.006610274,0.0011908304,0.00000963509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030922,0.000026747943,0.8356892,0.0000051173415,0.00010213853,0.000007223821,0.0008031295,0.00008098707,0.001600054,0.001080284,0.03414887,0.12614706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047615202,0.0001352228,0.91052204,0.000036624708,0.000016826692,0.00008370529,0.00025159598,0.000481826,0.0009921212,0.08596311,0.00097516505,0.00006560057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000790887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004361332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12608147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003632934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005343167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99279284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2700484896","doi":"10.29173/cais188","title":"Science in the European Union – “Before and After” A Scientometric Approach to Measure the Structural Transformation of Science in Central and Eastern Europe after the Political-Economical Changes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; European union; Scientometrics; Political science; Politics; Geography; Regional science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.12207664046591275,"score_gpt":0.3635625514400739,"score_spread":0.2414859109741611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2700484896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725176,0.0005668544,0.000040171264,0.020309204,0.00023629163,0.0011158854,0.0000897228,0.000003902585,0.0051203794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992328,0.000122193,0.00012060731,0.0003018329,0.000052230393,0.00003469255,3.566602e-7,0.000010603004,0.00012468407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926071,0.0003914129,0.0008677467,0.00073619286,0.0041091675,0.001288376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96419066,0.0008017495,0.0004943428,0.00044615747,0.033617888,0.00044919766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028088644,0.00027971782,0.00041935287,0.014206829,0.000401752,0.013551457,0.0065910667,0.000088808345,0.000013249684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0537518,0.0001311883,0.00008148696,0.086914495,0.009692587,0.010548292,0.0021394473,0.0005285046,0.0000029645141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009817545,0.00016776814,0.7352747,0.00018244327,0.000009124275,9.3589233e-7,0.08696652,0.000011782789,0.0026932606,0.021486819,0.000052404466,0.15305607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003437346,0.00031991772,0.97188514,0.00015763103,0.00001565537,0.00004118639,0.015361896,0.008005656,0.00076472585,0.0021977886,0.000751044,0.00015562901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092752435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012889295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23661044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014361106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067050464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878377},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2705668613","doi":"10.29173/cais133","title":"Interdisciplinary Outreach of Library and Information Science Research as Reflected in “Essential Science Indicators”","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.15518211831636614,"score_gpt":0.46798115390538914,"score_spread":0.312799035589023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705668613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495586,0.00068627734,0.0000074407253,0.008209268,0.000388913,0.0007677049,0.00010271728,0.000012645255,0.040266395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728763,0.0009914197,0.00061323727,0.00006243946,0.0000486836,0.000028263052,0.0000017192081,0.0000126451905,0.0009539835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716265,0.00013684372,0.0015760142,0.00081273733,0.0089671975,0.0013445403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7642708,0.0029734895,0.002524511,0.00095747225,0.22805825,0.0012155037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020071948,0.0002877904,0.00065925356,0.057212465,0.000633316,0.0223456,0.009958355,0.00027698165,0.0002331928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19100112,0.00020995208,0.00012960253,0.17757657,0.015005653,0.14496526,0.013594065,0.0009626102,0.000027744294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025261895,0.00060391746,0.56321347,0.0005415273,0.000029600715,0.0000021120632,0.058865886,0.0000034592063,0.11077236,0.07988452,0.0026972962,0.18313324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067937456,0.0009490803,0.7738341,0.00065667863,0.000015464117,0.000033979013,0.017951054,0.002868599,0.1668705,0.028944755,0.0068923226,0.00030408704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070585497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004658265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2228919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017885068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044984473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731216545","doi":"10.21810/strm.v4i1.56","title":"Enclosure and emancipation in scholarly journals publishing: Overview, critical, global and communication perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Publishing; Enclosure; Sociology; Media studies; Scholarly communication; Social science; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Politics; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.5381497618845964,"score_gpt":0.5839818271858536,"score_spread":0.04583206530125716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731216545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9194027,0.05869118,0.0011128678,0.009883189,0.000101085636,0.00014134713,0.000015793525,0.000007070763,0.010644734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98165363,0.010361779,0.007877929,0.00003532827,0.000027603646,0.0000038713447,0.0000022488578,0.0000069527623,0.000030630214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419993,0.0013684012,0.0013495245,0.0002842335,0.0025281243,0.00026979815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953444,0.0025944817,0.0009363096,0.0010134917,0.0056000683,0.00032122218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023958845,0.00014905015,0.00037833222,0.009627264,0.0004970012,0.0051989155,0.0026664638,0.00015802056,0.00019516364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024800815,0.00011299846,0.000104722625,0.016045742,0.00050837063,0.011578811,0.0028792813,0.0009401397,0.000005648745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038281272,0.0010590369,0.66291755,0.00002315618,0.00006477568,0.000022507293,0.03132405,0.000008274645,0.00019070179,0.026962124,0.0036518238,0.27339318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004974095,0.00034730078,0.7330231,0.00021257381,0.000013519,0.0001674457,0.023268297,0.00052265753,0.00003408026,0.2416218,0.00018615613,0.00010563005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082557905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018785494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27328756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025503128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015426344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99583375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735828996","doi":"10.21037/arh.2017.07.01","title":"Scientific publishing in different countries: what simple numbers do not tell","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Research Hospitals","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Gross domestic product; Productivity; Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Regional science; Scientific publishing; Bibliometrics; Product (mathematics); Position (finance); Library science; Scientific literature; Geography; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Law; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.75696935636546,"score_gpt":0.6483349814115639,"score_spread":0.10863437495389616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735828996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669203,0.0025269382,0.000026631857,0.021053093,0.00093161565,0.00060884864,0.00010463516,0.000015492229,0.007812413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910603,0.0047246064,0.000047712336,0.00012908124,0.0001416855,0.000031677726,0.000008375281,0.000020580414,0.003835964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646189,0.0008585634,0.0013888329,0.0016388764,0.029223958,0.0022708685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593436,0.013828003,0.00078257243,0.004622111,0.020299885,0.0011238187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13353065,0.0002533517,0.0007245675,0.0576461,0.0018299028,0.12530631,0.012091087,0.0002577481,0.0012159001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26552135,0.00017451785,0.000307062,0.06073374,0.0028392016,0.016601996,0.0044237883,0.0010155642,0.00053633715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009578981,0.00034391592,0.6535555,0.000044980286,0.0000275584,0.00007388151,0.00086685823,0.000012831721,0.00046747312,0.0039248997,0.22602941,0.11455689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008025247,0.00045240502,0.80522376,0.00022236,0.0000017929761,0.000001913397,0.0050352784,0.000648421,0.023296423,0.068385765,0.09555635,0.00037301934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014658943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002865009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15166824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012244648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059144286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737578613","doi":"10.1126/science.aan4141","title":"Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Peer review; Scientific integrity; Computer science; Data science; Biology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8970602255231176,"score_gpt":0.6988842992273749,"score_spread":0.19817592629574265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737578613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5083873,0.047187585,0.04895302,0.24630725,0.04593306,0.0027733105,0.0005199045,0.00016194185,0.099776566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94968235,0.0019079591,0.009856856,0.0005740836,0.00036486474,0.00000474645,0.000007860268,0.000012599167,0.037588682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95623785,0.00018142362,0.0008067776,0.0017524956,0.039963305,0.0010581579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95240164,0.0009018495,0.0011889478,0.012024354,0.03195034,0.0015328496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31039837,0.00015329881,0.00033462764,0.02239696,0.007679608,0.0539028,0.047565524,0.000059856007,0.0010242083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47348374,0.00009106161,0.00010664831,0.10695715,0.0047263545,0.008696931,0.01050682,0.0008554845,0.0018177019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002960084,0.00008799492,0.017227102,0.000016142047,0.0000029612381,0.00003411383,0.000059411956,4.113129e-7,0.003186823,0.00023769862,0.23362747,0.7455169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018795587,0.00006949718,0.1170657,0.00017156858,0.0000073616075,0.0001637556,0.00004419454,0.008281236,0.0009703662,0.020862032,0.8519336,0.00024272918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004027522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026229434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014535103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022369607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739655593","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.1887","title":"Open access increases citations of papers in ecology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Confounding; Latin Americans; Citation impact; Library science; Ecology; Geography; Political science; Medicine; Biology; Computer science; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.7533937263709878,"score_gpt":0.6796219715834086,"score_spread":0.07377175478757914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739655593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6391806,0.000065948356,0.000011622759,0.00080755726,0.00019960853,0.00015277552,0.000019554569,0.000002509882,0.3595598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937948,0.00009220423,0.0006353667,0.00007903121,0.00002208867,0.000016819373,0.0000014865707,0.000004469385,0.0053537264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970307,0.0001310382,0.00044252054,0.00039395454,0.0017177708,0.0002840585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994874,0.0028050446,0.00037642583,0.0010527187,0.0007308574,0.00016092807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075763552,0.000068186826,0.00025792274,0.0061470666,0.0003042006,0.0058196723,0.0117626,0.00006868123,0.011784892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06174083,0.000050024835,0.000057653568,0.026509415,0.00017424466,0.0016449131,0.0048095128,0.00011227791,0.00037240668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013004445,0.00014270225,0.8591108,0.0000020689795,0.0000054588245,0.000010884654,0.000023742878,0.00004213331,0.000059834554,0.0016272281,0.06524387,0.073718324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003988479,0.00004917165,0.9680068,0.0000053588215,0.0000012007677,8.341188e-7,0.00016958326,0.0005038951,0.0001276255,0.0142846,0.016389135,0.000062956366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00324326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009333338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3546142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004462881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027163516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741809807","doi":"10.7717/peerj.4375","title":"The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Citation analysis; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5282231477637149,"score_gpt":0.6017320210786108,"score_spread":0.07350887331489586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741809807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96064085,0.0029639092,0.00022056325,0.00024200017,0.00012169241,0.00056200835,0.0017105511,0.0000028145728,0.03353564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8455702,0.0015329726,0.00005238517,0.000010224912,0.000012761479,0.0000032872624,0.0000015342889,0.000008895087,0.15280771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929962,0.00012240805,0.00084376783,0.00045118007,0.0053072916,0.00027914517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899443,0.003739059,0.0011130472,0.0013857416,0.0036864695,0.000131399],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016313516,0.00013833749,0.0006271086,0.016320225,0.00014955021,0.0015436142,0.007818034,0.000073421106,0.0015215742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007630619,0.000058295172,0.00045456726,0.048086833,0.0007706537,0.0004106737,0.005687029,0.00015802332,0.000008775237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002418176,0.00021177756,0.8127762,0.00011974871,0.0021655196,0.0000021604344,0.0017272405,0.00019837345,0.0006409894,0.0020471558,0.021487763,0.15838122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021532143,0.00018298795,0.9391779,0.000040822946,0.00030420092,6.523356e-7,0.00004934677,0.006232704,0.00085615856,0.047488365,0.005329829,0.00012174973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043394935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000495926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15825947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034347762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023483165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742734818","doi":"","title":"Open Access among Canadian Library and Information Science Faculty / L'accès libre dans la communauté de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Humanities; Access to information; Sociology; Information access; Art","score_opus":0.27498958596042294,"score_gpt":0.45043017610888453,"score_spread":0.17544059014846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742734818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45239913,0.0000059521003,0.00047604454,0.002320218,0.00028826424,0.00048009734,0.00049697724,0.000018666828,0.54351467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498112,0.046791214,0.0024432144,0.0006807755,0.000031975895,0.000004133771,0.00003447471,0.000010130604,0.00019288826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483323,0.0004622405,0.0004602549,0.00053691526,0.0021159002,0.0015914624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472034,0.0013668602,0.0006503787,0.00093888317,0.0009316153,0.0013919255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010792596,0.00028889818,0.0003243549,0.23202918,0.0087288795,0.0718991,0.018087316,0.0002244701,0.000114227994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009617531,0.00027829135,0.000071956274,0.26478523,0.0058322605,0.21495621,0.0116347065,0.0005017762,0.000016736993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038821163,0.000046420617,0.70808935,0.000055783847,0.000024318137,0.000071588336,0.009021971,0.0002885558,0.0000011774424,0.025544325,0.0026059137,0.25421175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044220217,0.00006665839,0.40606064,0.000083265295,0.000011415472,0.000020924239,0.003524819,0.011951669,0.00012638749,0.000037335867,0.57743436,0.00024032166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57482845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031537754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091713816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743500302","doi":"10.1186/s12992-017-0284-y","title":"Global research trends in West Nile virus from 1943 to 2016: a bibliometric analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Globalization and Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Public health; Bibliometrics; Library science; West Nile virus; Medicine; Geography; Socioeconomics; Political science; MEDLINE; Virology; Virus; Pathology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.7076635970603089,"score_gpt":0.6744412597005542,"score_spread":0.03322233735975466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743500302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091306,0.006575438,0.019138616,0.025154762,0.00113854,0.00065835717,0.001592897,0.000057329526,0.036553472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950505,0.00207262,0.00066918944,0.0006968245,0.00008575299,0.000011851395,0.000049445054,0.0000060893403,0.0013577177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989737,0.0005593005,0.00089575554,0.0011308652,0.006687133,0.000989946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418503,0.00064663286,0.00035997652,0.0014508998,0.0021158415,0.0012416134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029614367,0.00015844729,0.0005535963,0.6215744,0.0012442191,0.0065602893,0.0023713685,0.00014389871,0.0013674886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014241348,0.00012531575,0.000114508504,0.89964473,0.00017882357,0.00068186875,0.0011802093,0.0001851541,0.00039035678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015199617,0.00008480215,0.6216386,0.000001564546,0.000014210338,0.000004318582,0.00005794098,0.00006071046,0.0000017625022,0.0009942438,0.0716271,0.30549958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004408387,0.00013557961,0.94653255,0.000008616815,0.0000060122034,6.706046e-7,0.00011314963,0.004356563,0.0000023407317,0.0042964383,0.043987025,0.0001202039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0897153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05813236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32489398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005746761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043490497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747001800","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.12404.1","title":"Exploring Vietnamese co-authorship patterns in social sciences with basic network measures of 2008-2017 Scopus data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Clustering coefficient; Scopus; Cluster analysis; Biology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.9720149141063179,"score_gpt":0.6744967559506466,"score_spread":0.2975181581556713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747001800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678401,0.004605644,0.0017479811,0.0029520916,0.001810097,0.0021143525,0.0017272239,0.0000627729,0.017139735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937695,0.0026489794,0.001085905,0.000025754302,0.0010036222,0.00017006086,0.0001099987,0.000058245387,0.00112788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9551693,0.0026136225,0.0017223207,0.0034522307,0.034381773,0.002660747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98084885,0.006467498,0.0012458588,0.0062350626,0.004501865,0.00070084387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14956689,0.0005564939,0.0014759494,0.06429328,0.0019218588,0.008801022,0.033463318,0.00051907497,0.00046497188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05174103,0.00039163252,0.00024657673,0.07765008,0.0027109035,0.0022037562,0.020681629,0.0032457388,0.00020253233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002974081,0.00030850235,0.82002753,0.00020001957,0.00008001552,0.0002518448,0.0008951875,0.0015162226,0.000071458024,0.00030865654,0.062858306,0.11318485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013132556,0.0005633878,0.95071,0.0010862728,0.000025756846,0.00001606947,0.0013985808,0.014408349,0.0004614485,0.015544175,0.0134032555,0.0010694661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032105052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001761803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13068245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043092314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985355},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2748401780","doi":"10.1186/s12916-017-0927-0","title":"Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Medical Association; Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Core competency; Medicine; Documentation; Publication; Medical education; Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Statement (logic); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.8874701275799235,"score_gpt":0.66066345119232,"score_spread":0.22680667638760355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748401780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92979527,0.0024391073,0.023553716,0.0128195,0.027486077,0.00089267286,0.0002759476,0.000023119617,0.0027145932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859557,0.00007606262,0.007475471,0.00005326271,0.0024403762,0.000014888601,0.000011908047,0.000010791049,0.003961496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854922,0.00011095243,0.0014246415,0.0006319831,0.011772395,0.00056777976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804648,0.0095528,0.0012671094,0.0015937291,0.006436694,0.0006848424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056761626,0.00014422169,0.0005727272,0.024495484,0.0010919975,0.001169777,0.0034387514,0.00009194133,0.00086849695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22798699,0.000080216065,0.0001500851,0.02159723,0.003669876,0.00019927534,0.00059303973,0.00016639434,0.0000510567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007923767,0.0001573572,0.07760818,0.000046981888,0.000024466755,0.000010713029,0.00026757928,0.000005752295,0.011294126,0.0010629663,0.88192374,0.027518922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040868586,0.0013243579,0.17516436,0.00022178271,0.000035161316,0.000018454462,0.0033551645,0.011033147,0.0022521848,0.021934392,0.78032714,0.00024700596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010576886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048301914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17122535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006364707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068339816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749291387","doi":"10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-16-0458","title":"Author Impact Metrics in Communication Sciences and Disorder Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Promotion (chess); Accreditation; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Psychology; Impact factor; Medical education; MEDLINE; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.8407099573396452,"score_gpt":0.7295781448308641,"score_spread":0.11113181250878101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749291387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771943,0.012883967,0.000030417554,0.0060464917,0.000065022665,0.00017476027,0.0000034418606,0.0000024222666,0.0035991757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338585,0.0032492364,0.0019294609,0.000007947802,0.00011011881,0.0000020724005,2.1403355e-7,0.000008236323,0.0013068805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853814,0.0012063537,0.0007326591,0.00042786088,0.011363788,0.0008878918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831823,0.010616798,0.00031552115,0.00095967704,0.004420161,0.0005055215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21226612,0.0001033729,0.00037121485,0.05992843,0.002214718,0.008813643,0.0034245201,0.00013499653,0.00013035852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12860852,0.00006450202,0.00007839887,0.042033356,0.0016652979,0.0015348162,0.0026432187,0.0019076027,0.000019933701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045537337,0.00008089118,0.6262845,0.000010337908,0.0000079661595,0.00012051783,0.0013029682,0.0000047271483,0.0010907602,0.00046124143,0.001763052,0.36882755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065569393,0.0006733496,0.96822,0.000097201126,0.0000018981575,0.0001116279,0.011458952,0.0020816133,0.0005475546,0.013542337,0.0025079239,0.00010182592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004448402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004630785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36872572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001714318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047506578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750019786","doi":"10.1002/1873-3468.12792","title":"Peer Review – the future is here","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FEBS Letters","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Promotion (chess); Citation; Peer review; Impact factor; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5201533861824702,"score_gpt":0.5697646892874678,"score_spread":0.04961130310499762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750019786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030230256,0.012985501,0.0001534623,0.9408212,0.0015413556,0.0002338614,0.00002519545,0.000012391645,0.013996782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4584732,0.018934727,0.00059987215,0.39980665,0.0029886914,0.00004907018,0.000008792733,0.000037877035,0.119101115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656714,0.0001412779,0.00033767257,0.00048551423,0.012036364,0.00043201828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385977,0.0008458335,0.0002975053,0.0025562926,0.0022439407,0.00019665115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021719946,0.000115508155,0.0002217074,0.0045259264,0.0011032048,0.0053254166,0.0064113834,0.000055383833,0.0016930379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027085492,0.000054630716,0.00020953415,0.023986826,0.00023142829,0.0005361527,0.0008345111,0.00032186473,0.0026487464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013613998,0.000006933042,0.0129942475,0.0000072212215,0.000005255972,0.000010835058,0.000035043715,1.9720625e-7,0.00006666154,0.00008966368,0.87742025,0.10936235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008989744,0.000010598013,0.083036676,0.000026524776,0.0000042556453,0.00000544258,0.00007103332,0.000037413014,0.00005033893,0.00043559176,0.9161495,0.00008273544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055516986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012038414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54101455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035221034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042982527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751036922","doi":"10.1038/549007a","title":"Illegitimate journals scam even senior scientists","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Litany; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.5142632163913022,"score_gpt":0.6416546012437285,"score_spread":0.1273913848524263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751036922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8632288,0.004881724,0.0005267703,0.014991009,0.0063497927,0.0003561877,0.0001465057,0.00004810719,0.10947111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97826964,0.00016437777,0.0011578816,0.00047071767,0.00034306405,0.0000037951809,0.0000016101432,0.0000111153395,0.019577786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985333,0.00012293439,0.00047492096,0.0007529717,0.012598096,0.000718052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991539,0.0011057561,0.0005275841,0.0019953214,0.004253917,0.00057843287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023837466,0.00015195801,0.00030242174,0.028524095,0.0019410652,0.017385608,0.0069598,0.00084873784,0.00194165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08904742,0.00009575424,0.00021808977,0.044864148,0.00032779778,0.0015743113,0.0014642304,0.0022039767,0.001577278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022375058,0.000101548896,0.13535492,0.000004947326,0.000020415351,0.00015748087,0.00007239324,0.0000051908046,0.0024273212,0.0027494149,0.5477003,0.31138372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004486518,0.00003803157,0.6512295,0.000019939773,0.0000038820617,0.000048741804,0.000055244705,0.00091832917,0.0014865055,0.021149071,0.32441643,0.00018569425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023157301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016791133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51587456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076823955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020375517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751704775","doi":"10.5465/amp.2016.0138","title":"Serendipity Arrangements for Exapting Science-Based Innovations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Exaptation; Serendipity; Performativity; Temporality; Extant taxon; Epistemology; Orchestration; Narrative; Sociology; Cognitive science; Biology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.704219218842055,"score_gpt":0.6320928089577392,"score_spread":0.07212640988431573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751704775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78830385,0.00038281226,0.044626586,0.017283302,0.00050218095,0.0017885141,0.000082856175,0.00005879975,0.14697108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98596185,0.000059705464,0.011609471,0.000107733875,0.00007103351,0.000047836806,8.864661e-7,0.000008214199,0.0021332854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922614,0.00004570531,0.0005512718,0.0008918539,0.005690421,0.00055932277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995715,0.00083866686,0.00072479947,0.0007822105,0.0017830619,0.00015621999],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021280425,0.00013797711,0.00025370458,0.030398877,0.0018889066,0.0021736082,0.0054579074,0.000061865685,0.00019039481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017638585,0.000109169945,0.00013556721,0.03486708,0.0011852578,0.0014987634,0.001173176,0.00016636465,0.00003349007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102738086,0.000601141,0.126438,0.000072692936,0.0001442929,0.0000018030262,0.0008197779,0.00015295607,0.00392462,0.504554,0.012885717,0.3503023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012166278,0.0000938377,0.92548376,0.000025452577,0.000018789013,1.7825806e-7,0.004571624,0.0043116286,0.00494787,0.039744932,0.019380443,0.00020483485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018514198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017350787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015380398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080235666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751853820","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3906","title":"Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Library science; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7298564952173201,"score_gpt":0.6544215829644491,"score_spread":0.07543491225287102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751853820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23787731,0.006239104,0.000060823368,0.30678838,0.00033956484,0.00057537004,0.000073357274,0.00000616722,0.44803992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545485,0.0019235916,0.00018254477,0.0004451331,0.0002040722,0.000003777428,0.00000213055,0.00000583965,0.001778072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886036,0.0021244574,0.00068997464,0.00020985198,0.007528841,0.00084330427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96404773,0.019778002,0.00083401415,0.00091592723,0.012128504,0.0022958147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10161031,0.00010896747,0.00022655747,0.03879334,0.005858558,0.03357773,0.00297349,0.00014811326,0.0003368008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21332103,0.000056040717,0.000098449476,0.029847268,0.0017405814,0.05452465,0.0006264305,0.0020986816,0.00011837029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006700682,0.0000685202,0.096745625,0.000026365795,0.00019833776,0.00018526879,0.017088741,0.000031159292,0.000009282867,0.44930574,0.28617615,0.14949474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004927839,0.0006112872,0.14250568,0.000023592565,0.000007880345,0.00028494903,0.052164923,0.0007078101,0.00007836379,0.03181339,0.7712012,0.0001081575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047852797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028952866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75757754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014139462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045615905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99543566},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2753955980","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2182","title":"Measuring Cost per Use of Library-Funded Open Access Article Processing Charges: Examination and Implications of One Method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Payment; Publishing; Actuarial science; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.8868527694239678,"score_gpt":0.6048805113465975,"score_spread":0.28197225807737036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753955980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97130847,0.002745899,0.016740263,0.007019798,0.00003675484,0.0003227346,0.00001893943,0.000004596081,0.0018025441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94743115,0.0019778605,0.050348002,0.000058245307,0.000018862132,0.000004932143,0.0000021980602,0.000009330813,0.00014939618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959452,0.0009475953,0.0010408107,0.00022327578,0.0016805668,0.00016251161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081355,0.003111881,0.0022381563,0.0011818109,0.002419814,0.00023479974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01840782,0.00009035418,0.00036734968,0.006641776,0.00071864686,0.036455985,0.0059312494,0.00010122731,0.00005476874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020559875,0.00006957087,0.00005751575,0.007282121,0.00022076229,0.06562548,0.0028758734,0.00042981523,8.7593025e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048528982,0.00014997665,0.6533249,0.000016585685,0.000020933123,2.7424576e-7,0.00072939356,0.000005014393,0.009035011,0.0050699394,0.00013146717,0.33146796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005812958,0.000077904595,0.9678118,0.000111275134,0.000019906836,0.000009129058,0.00033099437,0.0011041261,0.0069472045,0.022152513,0.00078111346,0.00007269671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000739979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009699565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33139527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020972304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026710672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756363584","doi":"10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135097","title":"Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Publication; Medicine; Publishing; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6403992013114378,"score_gpt":0.5497187768184835,"score_spread":0.09068042449295433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756363584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682324,0.0008962756,0.0040427856,0.021555053,0.0012783087,0.00021127271,0.00008940113,0.000017756664,0.0036767565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573416,0.0014519207,0.0008749212,0.00030985964,0.00040758072,0.000015551614,0.000008817734,0.000014946393,0.0011822372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772876,0.0008292256,0.0009721906,0.00083560805,0.01914059,0.00093478215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879507,0.0027715047,0.0006418282,0.0011676517,0.0044273655,0.0030409433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020905511,0.00022483432,0.00042552693,0.009894627,0.0019299076,0.024993945,0.0057628374,0.00028140232,0.0035222878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16668922,0.00014588416,0.00018323718,0.0078118076,0.0017025233,0.004502316,0.0016766809,0.0015660592,0.00013847502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018702034,0.0002658944,0.44214603,0.000005846787,0.00011179797,0.0008762252,0.003069425,0.0000031714173,0.00037726059,0.00024571622,0.04469395,0.50801766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013894263,0.00025933824,0.95437443,0.00008306484,0.000009886919,0.00008267124,0.0022541336,0.004443705,0.000078598045,0.023346959,0.0134444805,0.00023333177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017530578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023941987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51222837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011081769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011025526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756498337","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2019.491","title":"Predatory publications in evidence syntheses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Medical Library Association","keywords":"Checklist; Publication; Systematic review; Grey literature; Peer review; Publishing; MEDLINE; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4347540435894559,"score_gpt":0.5258972688182807,"score_spread":0.09114322522882479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756498337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83654267,0.0013286279,0.0001223462,0.14317162,0.0024682402,0.00021175678,0.000013089034,0.000012479921,0.016129171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760246,0.00039218616,0.0001319841,0.0009593544,0.00020238914,0.0000018452937,2.0268503e-7,0.0000056011872,0.022281827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824041,0.001035515,0.0010669185,0.00019352185,0.015024297,0.0002756393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340238,0.060248774,0.002308569,0.00083300006,0.0019068246,0.0006790137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036808323,0.00007030381,0.00027022843,0.011157895,0.00007515922,0.0012272805,0.0039814226,0.00016737978,0.0072515593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45767656,0.000035210796,0.00022128453,0.059026588,0.000049667502,0.0035112884,0.0006679933,0.00071058003,0.0002860211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010570913,0.00008210785,0.8934903,0.0000024308363,0.000010871942,0.0000026801124,0.000046946017,0.00001691893,0.000025185862,0.0007558713,0.09646654,0.00908957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002326156,0.000053971344,0.82628447,0.00015972456,0.0000033458066,0.000010749493,0.0001265792,0.0012217211,0.00015063483,0.0047401995,0.16695736,0.00005863611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032559492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018063668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42086822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002021259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011359677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759024906","doi":"","title":"Pratiques de publication, dépôt institutionnel et perception du libre accès : enquête auprès des chercheuses et chercheurs de l’Université Laval (Québec)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.3489982636259524,"score_gpt":0.4770851894113248,"score_spread":0.1280869257853724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759024906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40255284,0.0019814102,0.33049595,0.21872628,0.00044213037,0.0004487921,0.00003514731,0.00022829436,0.045089133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712954,0.020652685,0.06204851,0.0043690437,0.00025928768,0.000036158053,0.00002718602,0.000037200054,0.041274536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904283,0.0029061548,0.00079443207,0.001102226,0.0035442591,0.0012246135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787344,0.0067235804,0.00040288302,0.0012354467,0.011522425,0.0013813074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040784437,0.0003748559,0.0004188035,0.018050363,0.00079690706,0.0069391895,0.0036775705,0.00064194656,0.004448986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13751464,0.00031990034,0.00027115637,0.06579415,0.00077298534,0.0062312162,0.0013935317,0.00090892444,0.00074976264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048534126,0.0008194563,0.34269348,0.000062621926,0.00006396408,0.000011546913,0.012087661,0.00024014756,0.0041977307,0.09972827,0.14835693,0.39168966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071162893,0.00028439498,0.6751094,0.000048784426,0.00002437419,0.00006529193,0.002637801,0.029686017,0.0016668979,0.015536921,0.27380595,0.00042253372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07556595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036719467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46874255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026786865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071880566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760878772","doi":"10.1080/08109028.2017.1408289","title":"Managing the transition to open access publishing: a psychological perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prometheus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Exeter; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Open access publishing; Face (sociological concept); Transition (genetics); Peer pressure; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8627634791726088,"score_gpt":0.7134585090501455,"score_spread":0.14930497012246324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760878772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22191697,0.00021468765,0.024818134,0.38530228,0.0010199937,0.0016695494,0.00003334124,0.000040634073,0.36498442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942283,0.00004244367,0.0014796271,0.0015443432,0.00012973827,0.00009542539,6.8472e-7,0.000008967551,0.0024704926],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99279654,0.00036867717,0.00036275372,0.00097562367,0.004955962,0.00054045976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252516,0.001945038,0.00027544016,0.0021705362,0.0026962205,0.00038757792],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037241213,0.00012722203,0.00025134694,0.015058882,0.001718331,0.15046327,0.031882253,0.00008749041,0.0008776349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106870785,0.00006437151,0.000116542666,0.054928567,0.00023231497,0.008126625,0.0072772317,0.0004249372,0.00039309403],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013234669,0.00029429028,0.007693054,0.0000021523967,0.000029066392,0.00003204104,0.0023101275,0.00003672877,0.00026220243,0.021793688,0.07032566,0.89708865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055789785,0.00024333138,0.35795352,0.000010880633,0.0000063602542,0.000013971969,0.002093532,0.0015427448,0.0002857074,0.59958977,0.037485693,0.0002165576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010184866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006587386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8968721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012595153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007171243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762227057","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.008","title":"Mapping science using Library of Congress Subject Headings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library of congress; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Library of Congress Classification; Data science; Library classification","score_opus":0.6384368990329121,"score_gpt":0.5833211230820153,"score_spread":0.055115775950896784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762227057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748696,0.0005421247,0.0044210674,0.00024239764,0.0020624148,0.00009437589,0.000014974763,0.0000044728304,0.01774855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688066,0.00053864165,0.011858002,0.00006332413,0.00013767152,1.7040603e-7,1.5265884e-7,0.000008588626,0.00051281543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470527,0.00004818306,0.0018066365,0.00025140063,0.012602639,0.0005858891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825504,0.003134933,0.0044447468,0.0010091577,0.008259776,0.00060102943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036379527,0.0001379398,0.0005627316,0.15875909,0.0008683075,0.0065993713,0.008046128,0.000102552665,0.00016132419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16882387,0.000090465175,0.00028915354,0.18151087,0.0010716353,0.009738696,0.0016195731,0.0004331194,0.000019386485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055519893,0.00009712867,0.73172945,0.00002332576,0.000027484037,0.000053145643,0.0002860258,0.00012497231,0.0062505947,0.0008795857,0.005254867,0.2552179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019365711,0.00087186147,0.83449596,0.00022243733,0.00001910701,0.0004167346,0.0020466389,0.019352091,0.067934565,0.0065845875,0.06565077,0.00046868995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038306513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.147794e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2547492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001480388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018544471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99732083},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2762362539","doi":"10.1177/1056492617726270","title":"Escape From Abilene: The Developmental Opportunity of the Review Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Institution; Construct (python library); Unintended consequences; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Process (computing); State (computer science); Public relations; Work (physics); Scale (ratio); Political science; Management; Social science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.713413562543332,"score_gpt":0.5924005284305639,"score_spread":0.12101303411276809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762362539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91810364,0.012242786,0.0009261745,0.028215092,0.003927894,0.00085017725,0.000020423602,0.000005228731,0.035708565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844299,0.012480505,0.0005208968,0.001043405,0.00017504147,0.0000044634007,3.884624e-7,0.0000064505675,0.0013389691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901566,0.0002639726,0.0011015247,0.00021687718,0.008023607,0.00023740018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993412,0.0009387564,0.0023108749,0.0011525871,0.0019993768,0.00018639282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026971972,0.000108739216,0.0003335981,0.0038475646,0.0005733736,0.0009896049,0.008682902,0.000038118873,0.0008300394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019016018,0.000044730197,0.00025551012,0.013312606,0.0004133533,0.00068795413,0.0017675291,0.0003056409,0.000038052196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035634363,0.0002448549,0.093876146,0.00015892634,0.0001800089,0.000045087774,0.00040283747,0.000013702989,0.000054444554,0.00035741346,0.31157944,0.5930515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005250328,0.00007441199,0.82172936,0.0007192869,0.00007854259,0.000019583926,0.0026512484,0.00006655323,0.00046783118,0.01063003,0.16290866,0.00012944559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000139815065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003959013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72785324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062759726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023380583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763328223","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0185578","title":"Beyond funding: Acknowledgement patterns in biomedical, natural and social sciences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa; University of Pennsylvania; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Discipline; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.7192005164441284,"score_gpt":0.5602536689157159,"score_spread":0.15894684752841248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763328223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879864,0.0003306286,0.00003191079,0.0051703067,0.0003115369,0.0001565468,0.00001890595,0.000009703584,0.005984062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759644,0.000117446914,0.0005192327,0.00011416061,0.00017328808,0.000008570342,0.0000016936658,0.000004450541,0.0014646956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914617,0.00009069122,0.00038160165,0.0006127598,0.0068927687,0.00056045933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975922,0.00095639494,0.00020484085,0.0004134665,0.0006621712,0.00017094298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012354446,0.000103154314,0.00027383273,0.020781307,0.0012165193,0.0047971797,0.0025551254,0.000076154036,0.00045103685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016959507,0.000071488445,0.000044202166,0.020171186,0.0008616452,0.00069541065,0.0015582531,0.0002377273,0.00019947244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008898806,0.00091042893,0.9354104,0.00001936842,0.000021892209,0.000013771494,0.00033287334,4.8329447e-8,0.0033762788,0.0009619555,0.003492554,0.05545155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070274033,0.00018947563,0.9838864,0.000037985654,0.000008089553,7.79499e-7,0.00048646532,0.003363179,0.0015075471,0.007440484,0.002182838,0.00019399333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060354134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103767976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055257555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067694025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001006349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765334272","doi":"10.14429/djlit.37.5.11573","title":"Metamaterials Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2007-16","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; Library science; China; Metamaterial; Web of science; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Physics; Computer science; Law; Optics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5649173997868181,"score_gpt":0.5944565569745612,"score_spread":0.029539157187743137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765334272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94991535,0.0004803391,0.010419322,0.010975781,0.0009796995,0.00033630425,0.00011004519,0.00005108886,0.026732087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98761904,0.0004896647,0.011148626,0.000042924705,0.000084032195,0.000009426547,0.0000041022777,0.0000064255496,0.0005957739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873117,0.0003534617,0.0025891971,0.00026436572,0.008789293,0.00069198664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852946,0.0011452909,0.0037682357,0.0015954026,0.007826623,0.0003698625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029095357,0.0001516526,0.0005843825,0.14585528,0.00094758434,0.0065263915,0.008144996,0.00026553348,0.00086686295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0632099,0.00010797067,0.00021837257,0.14890714,0.00091194996,0.018520527,0.0022870041,0.00057459425,0.00014898564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063166226,0.00024261995,0.7403365,0.00004025058,0.000095957344,0.000012334132,0.00006868298,0.000045956338,0.00094249914,0.11232102,0.050925683,0.094905324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010754724,0.00042638468,0.8718072,0.000045251334,0.0000116584615,0.00017490734,0.00067893456,0.00029798655,0.0109382225,0.05671687,0.057664678,0.00016241585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017481158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.2157336e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13147072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002854057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013216106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765390333","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0112","title":"Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Originality; Bibliographic database; Search engine indexing; Subject (documents); Web of science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.638216984837964,"score_gpt":0.6510249154957314,"score_spread":0.012807930657767419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765390333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96314216,0.00012342834,0.03533495,0.0006073329,0.0004565607,0.000105266336,0.0000020425748,0.0000014236882,0.00022682037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987485,0.000042878502,0.01216164,0.0000116910105,0.00014936687,0.000002417001,4.672653e-7,0.0000048365514,0.00014168947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600947,0.000034580054,0.00062080123,0.00014620698,0.0029658554,0.00022310347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967925,0.001342272,0.0005696321,0.00021329708,0.0009486365,0.00013364822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013699053,0.000054349366,0.00016648273,0.014827573,0.00015399969,0.003971986,0.0012010415,0.000036749803,0.000051938947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026334878,0.000041098694,0.00010659378,0.0061682938,0.000026037667,0.0022782946,0.00016265718,0.00019075864,0.000015887588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014180859,0.00016082611,0.23395115,0.00003907724,0.000039600407,0.000056244706,0.0010979648,0.0019456848,0.19268268,0.0014078189,0.0021477134,0.5663294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008683977,0.0008059229,0.6422074,0.00038706805,0.00003896582,0.00013308685,0.0030156244,0.101328835,0.16532078,0.06994368,0.007552502,0.00058219535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030742063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003120215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56574726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017846585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008397886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765672937","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-5507","title":"Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Computer science; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Advertising; Law; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.5203472843812312,"score_gpt":0.5291059132112108,"score_spread":0.008758628829979576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765672937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50111806,0.00039948,0.000025381749,0.41854697,0.0018229432,0.00025597966,0.000098816556,0.0000038421167,0.07772855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235624,0.00021314147,0.000100517216,0.0015041037,0.00042252804,0.000003650844,7.458548e-7,0.0000061376127,0.0053929053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776751,0.0008292616,0.00075531343,0.00023863064,0.019782599,0.0007191303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896819,0.0025581294,0.0008261697,0.0005887268,0.0043235454,0.0020215136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.113042295,0.00006674027,0.00019373001,0.012289521,0.00087092555,0.00782397,0.005650811,0.0003398241,0.0027553525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42256054,0.00004030276,0.00012469926,0.023326496,0.00021870769,0.0017055768,0.000399612,0.0017930269,0.000037630507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014808347,0.000012328242,0.6401498,0.0000013013862,0.000007592271,0.00003471402,0.00013107629,0.0000026710923,0.0000021154747,0.00032836388,0.2761774,0.08315116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030730464,0.000012712062,0.5297825,0.00003764509,8.00062e-7,0.000010792613,0.00035610716,0.00027786964,0.0000122811825,0.00269427,0.46646655,0.000041176776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008680872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07069664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011135916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073672533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765699166","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.89","title":"Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam","keywords":"Publishing; Subsidy; Business; Developing country; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.7472106280624337,"score_gpt":0.6125763640191498,"score_spread":0.13463426404328382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765699166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7435307,0.0044590347,0.003794314,0.2331868,0.002943696,0.0005520191,0.000032212276,0.000010094891,0.011491119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090236,0.002825562,0.0016490961,0.0017507222,0.00074505416,0.0000062687827,8.4102675e-7,0.000028572229,0.0020915477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97047853,0.0012204108,0.0042885463,0.0007765185,0.022052795,0.0011832173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415068,0.011779809,0.011428138,0.0021426273,0.03225203,0.0008905908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2531886,0.0002915358,0.0010246066,0.04074986,0.0012253236,0.72767806,0.07085458,0.0005520071,0.000108648725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5364203,0.0001388198,0.0002715572,0.05015579,0.00034023664,0.55487907,0.016894085,0.00751677,0.000010355862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077980054,0.000045070552,0.87554574,0.000016515785,0.000049699585,0.000049358812,0.00083778036,0.000047539477,0.00012560157,0.00072860223,0.03889532,0.08358077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011529608,0.00006322523,0.8086415,0.00052610313,0.00001376966,0.000119729186,0.0012371704,0.00013875589,0.00042103123,0.013644599,0.1738266,0.000214547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008408397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018120024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28323165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006511374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031780442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765709240","doi":"10.1188/17.onf.641-642","title":"The Predatory Journal Issue: Part II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oncology nursing forum","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CancerCare Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Morning; Medicine; Focus (optics); Medical education; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.5582211958695689,"score_gpt":0.6374948490324746,"score_spread":0.07927365316290569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765709240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16437362,0.0040320694,0.0010143404,0.38577664,0.03029614,0.000338759,0.000017945267,0.000037389374,0.41411307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8724255,0.0014652592,0.0009256949,0.0008839309,0.0014479419,0.000011457808,9.1855236e-7,0.00001981406,0.12281947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367595,0.00032930906,0.00055858504,0.0004046106,0.004079112,0.00095246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302936,0.0027104982,0.00068413443,0.0014420411,0.0016962091,0.00043775115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02788058,0.000112253976,0.00025016448,0.0068929107,0.0115271,0.006075872,0.005453693,0.0001929676,0.0006022972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044154823,0.00006098804,0.00015698769,0.009864092,0.0013803786,0.0007695337,0.00078719005,0.00061597186,0.00059000845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017583587,0.000067003675,0.008025222,1.3599563e-7,0.000005787241,0.00001240553,0.000091044174,0.0000010993969,0.000023586672,0.0011688807,0.50612444,0.48446283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034733213,0.00046230137,0.026531348,0.000011606025,0.0000046717755,0.00009566084,0.000991524,0.00047204294,0.00011263581,0.03450456,0.9363872,0.00007915837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009579241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031878466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7080519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044259714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072020333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766272051","doi":"10.1002/asi.24130","title":"Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Surrey; Queen's University; Swansea University; Durham University; University of Bristol; Cardiff University; Loughborough University; University of Glasgow; University of Nottingham; University of Leeds; University of Aberdeen; Newcastle University; University of Reading; University of Warwick; University of Oxford; University of Dundee; Queen Mary University of London; Imperial College London; Bangor University; Queen's University Belfast; University of Cambridge; University of St Andrews; University College London; University of Southampton; University of Birmingham; University of Leicester; University of Exeter; London School of Economics and Political Science; King's College London","keywords":"Excellence; Stability (learning theory); Uncorrelated; Isomorphism (crystallography); Incentive; Homogeneous; Statistical significance; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3199335946386695,"score_gpt":0.49281921910728077,"score_spread":0.17288562446861128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766272051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859432,0.000099809324,0.0009130363,0.011378745,0.00021683166,0.00055310724,0.00016099658,0.0000024274518,0.0007318299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992456,0.00018935495,0.000127109,0.00003760948,0.0000079413185,0.000005771491,6.6713153e-7,0.0000016366681,0.00038434213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260336,0.00032549677,0.00068397826,0.00016369422,0.005983823,0.00023964296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523154,0.036601372,0.0020324148,0.0003418521,0.008656826,0.000052121173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055985045,0.000086821674,0.00030896868,0.01711764,0.0008273265,0.00073747843,0.0018945043,0.0001583162,0.000009384581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10685676,0.00003792687,0.00006219214,0.02160299,0.0022199175,0.00071037264,0.0012289562,0.0005491865,0.0000010413519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009900679,0.00002613292,0.9493474,0.00008150648,0.00004763076,1.3277858e-7,0.0011337185,0.00038563073,0.00035506033,0.030007739,0.0042394483,0.014276608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006611048,0.0004941192,0.93950695,0.00013926913,0.00003103524,0.000002863019,0.004617424,0.020552987,0.0040894765,0.028328262,0.0014839505,0.000092575836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004421083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050285205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05087172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033873544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000960499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766307773","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.103","title":"Adoption of Open Access Publishing by Academic Researchers in Kenya","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Publication; Publishing; Accreditation; Public relations; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.8470049518652517,"score_gpt":0.6541268974003143,"score_spread":0.19287805446493744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766307773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92618865,0.0026108955,0.0008505679,0.046234842,0.0010458985,0.00028733216,0.000038247632,0.000005141583,0.022738425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578977,0.0010159513,0.001403256,0.00027862255,0.00026222426,0.0000030808533,0.000003399222,0.000017982826,0.0012257277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96983325,0.0011448684,0.0029812409,0.0007410844,0.024289979,0.0010095681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612819,0.005733419,0.0056969416,0.0017094138,0.02436869,0.0012096204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2582119,0.0001739572,0.0006895277,0.06405682,0.00069325423,0.7067832,0.06237862,0.00054691895,0.00025015243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6856884,0.00012732774,0.00021307374,0.066855304,0.00028174088,0.6578752,0.014110327,0.0067785447,0.000014128659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096629985,0.00009074148,0.6593459,0.0000066951015,0.000017254211,0.000027722464,0.00016965019,0.000025410143,0.002556104,0.0006106328,0.17760555,0.15944767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020258692,0.00017358708,0.902085,0.00021431061,0.000006524985,0.00002813682,0.0015233743,0.00046979586,0.0010005307,0.027408866,0.06486577,0.0001982055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017649186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008102825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42747647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005320711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014581343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99551284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766631362","doi":"10.1007/s40037-017-0381-x","title":"Predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: Perspectives and implications for novice researchers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; The Quebec Population Health Research Network","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.5267025819357913,"score_gpt":0.6044501190546383,"score_spread":0.07774753711884697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766631362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064977366,0.009885632,0.001033648,0.96455425,0.0007124296,0.0012452713,0.000204239,0.00003744854,0.015829353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61775,0.02723865,0.00494961,0.27335995,0.017252142,0.0035252306,0.0006704714,0.00028970552,0.054964263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98881793,0.00050410215,0.00060090097,0.0021947888,0.0071056266,0.0007766383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976665,0.011035061,0.00065656577,0.0018213079,0.008596392,0.0012256597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013755218,0.00035532474,0.00056454784,0.019041141,0.0010160349,0.007805936,0.0030054734,0.0009996411,0.00082931796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24811819,0.00026671437,0.00016355584,0.009242122,0.0020506221,0.0011468616,0.00054340245,0.0023131697,0.000036165497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025651703,0.00027293828,0.0015894074,0.00004867285,0.0000538114,0.000002250058,0.0056744874,8.7965525e-8,0.000002607837,0.0076418533,0.8757215,0.10896671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004926209,0.0003421108,0.043846793,0.00009388522,0.00002323514,0.000015065615,0.06680329,0.00025927322,0.0000019757056,0.025126616,0.8626276,0.00036752675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036404602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024791132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005427472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062663886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766654013","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.1","title":"Special Issue on Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8042926188935705,"score_gpt":0.6550944232339806,"score_spread":0.14919819565958992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766654013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24801387,0.0001680814,0.0002071252,0.07089503,0.01100061,0.00020530091,0.000017609784,0.0000057059356,0.66948664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265463,0.00023235322,0.0021469505,0.0026339795,0.044042103,0.0000022905285,8.962724e-7,0.000027780408,0.024367357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97956955,0.00032522762,0.0012591992,0.00048439146,0.017831856,0.0005297556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734055,0.0029155905,0.0030407333,0.0017120569,0.0179602,0.0009659482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.107124485,0.00014429403,0.0004828775,0.044895798,0.0015841419,0.86547035,0.058974642,0.00020374231,0.0034807986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51866484,0.000091570866,0.00023335667,0.034890354,0.00013462697,0.43385234,0.010578511,0.0023504833,0.00035581933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005450159,0.000073493306,0.10234792,7.531566e-7,0.000012893989,0.00007777981,0.000068738955,0.00000494024,0.00004033269,0.00077984005,0.55864555,0.33789328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006583699,0.00016724547,0.32755664,0.000027153366,0.0000035053283,0.000028905786,0.00015410654,0.00003664736,0.00018629136,0.014446457,0.65664405,0.00009066403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001952618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026018703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6785324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002243904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072038424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766781696","doi":"10.2214/ajr.17.18077","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Manuscript Characteristics That Influence Citations: A Comparison of Six Major Radiology Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Roentgenology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Medical physics; Library science; Radiology; Computer science","score_opus":0.42414929523449185,"score_gpt":0.5606304783726436,"score_spread":0.13648118313815172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766781696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882716,0.002509268,0.007293823,0.0010204121,0.00054941943,0.0000978995,0.000083942556,0.0000029380394,0.00017071399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950147,0.002077088,0.002705326,0.00008074466,0.00004696755,0.0000018080843,0.000002103711,0.000010435794,0.00006078772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002886,0.00078927504,0.0031144244,0.00041243964,0.005028821,0.0006261798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700585,0.0053510945,0.01325647,0.0012910281,0.009605418,0.00043750813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014930036,0.00020599544,0.002394904,0.64514935,0.00030509802,0.0005993518,0.0054280297,0.00012517473,0.00037823533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069086805,0.00014889505,0.0006859102,0.5675114,0.0021594935,0.0007978675,0.00059121416,0.000540674,0.000015841055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001242546,0.00021948326,0.8344164,0.00000466208,0.00091070135,0.000027633896,0.00022576949,0.00023747857,0.003685457,0.00008544443,0.00054231484,0.15952042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049931515,0.0017302525,0.9924628,0.000016809343,0.00041301208,0.00008639288,0.0013341485,0.00095841096,0.0010110439,0.0005654037,0.00080366584,0.00011873544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003047899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003814633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15940168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009587316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032115667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2766932290","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.5","title":"Traditional versus Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing: An Economic Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misinformation; Electronic publishing; Scholarly communication; Perspective (graphical); Open access publishing; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.8658095751057954,"score_gpt":0.6303082985146546,"score_spread":0.23550127659114073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766932290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72448945,0.0014559218,0.0016463716,0.10656251,0.015171819,0.00034370154,0.00015675106,0.000020223824,0.15015328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833615,0.00028795341,0.004801818,0.00071664277,0.0048119547,0.0000037220946,0.000005366537,0.000041975567,0.0009943914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758969,0.0011473504,0.0025036442,0.001025041,0.018329203,0.0010978502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91402906,0.006315053,0.009006974,0.0027882613,0.06374548,0.0041151536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1650671,0.00034843606,0.0008807163,0.05186339,0.004778166,0.9670092,0.076787025,0.00053375016,0.0023121403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52051526,0.00026000585,0.0005895458,0.01954708,0.00038430543,0.8922455,0.008726421,0.008395823,0.00009304696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014729294,0.0007944292,0.23279968,0.000004500322,0.00046294605,0.000618578,0.0011203303,0.00025096408,0.00039666027,0.08729751,0.5100968,0.16468467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076963706,0.0012969048,0.5992395,0.00007369957,0.000051031257,0.0010628721,0.0070621935,0.0006764107,0.00012834236,0.27428055,0.10787681,0.0005553115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009909322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017492325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40221998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025866453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057737366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999852},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2767220712","doi":"10.31468/cjsdwr.449","title":"The Rhetoric of Science: Authority and Duty in an Article from the Exact Sciences","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Duty; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Law; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.573018254361351,"score_gpt":0.608334703307705,"score_spread":0.035316448946353995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767220712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906547,0.0028057555,0.000015413501,0.0034232482,0.00013497264,0.00015308619,0.00002287736,0.00001151768,0.0027784416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849015,0.0011836974,0.00012025362,0.00006920881,0.000054864468,0.000005561193,5.534124e-7,0.000003390949,0.00007231721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994418,0.0003248649,0.00053278316,0.0007080903,0.003345421,0.00067082664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103075,0.007589102,0.000115657946,0.0005884816,0.00043607876,0.00023991746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027192071,0.00012459427,0.00023642607,0.0029102447,0.0015963799,0.002668598,0.0021661897,0.00006825953,0.00014884114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009917134,0.000056447647,0.000044782588,0.041343756,0.006437415,0.001071972,0.00044267884,0.00028108948,0.000012426474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017547,0.00007496979,0.672698,7.722373e-7,0.0000021222215,0.0000046397336,0.0005135864,0.000009153678,0.0008078373,0.003609776,0.00018699624,0.32207456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022845932,0.00014925368,0.9659763,0.0000096768645,0.0000038965486,0.000003804235,0.008753641,0.004891168,0.0009275782,0.018448424,0.00050593476,0.000101893864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046940806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021156599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32197267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032305485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028529888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767442756","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scx074","title":"Research excellence in Africa: Policies, perceptions, and performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Excellence; Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Perception; Public relations; Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.7093521243612279,"score_gpt":0.6187410226984775,"score_spread":0.09061110166275033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767442756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.906734,0.00045933816,0.000011282125,0.019087907,0.00011333749,0.00015254764,0.000008275999,0.0000094561265,0.07342386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937457,0.0025515521,0.00013026438,0.00013433672,0.00013416303,0.000015034398,1.8603062e-7,0.000004556687,0.0032841926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98745495,0.00018433994,0.00039234408,0.0009468659,0.009380495,0.0016410222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928818,0.0012024578,0.00013950381,0.0014494347,0.003367152,0.00095964817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07218651,0.00012034318,0.00020780263,0.07104322,0.0043639652,0.015286727,0.0049797087,0.000085635,0.000079230944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0953948,0.0000846926,0.000023822922,0.109339826,0.006857783,0.004215666,0.003372017,0.00044660326,0.00013462477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004397846,0.00004686008,0.6003748,0.000004371317,6.944881e-7,0.0000026663445,0.0008027954,3.600654e-7,0.0005154559,0.015928548,0.003682472,0.3786366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018850056,0.00010682013,0.95475954,0.000008675362,2.8679491e-7,0.0000132499335,0.0016874452,0.0026505112,0.00004485496,0.009019048,0.031406287,0.00011480783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004589171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021331248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37852177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023403681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002329001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767448821","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4229","title":"Chapitre 6. Le système universitaire canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.15945941020929205,"score_gpt":0.33781912024609545,"score_spread":0.1783597100368034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767448821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021491682,0.018919814,0.0008731071,0.0024189614,0.0006137715,0.00064830406,0.00073566847,0.00010672951,0.954192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21056066,0.0015308484,0.0005265057,0.00008676146,0.00016842941,0.000003784711,0.000033527627,0.00008100112,0.78700846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924404,0.00036561544,0.0007289557,0.0016074922,0.006022756,0.0020311198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98915106,0.001818961,0.00067981106,0.0015370233,0.003729954,0.0030831662],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050566257,0.0007929421,0.0010460868,0.023556476,0.0015963017,0.0010767614,0.005121615,0.0011302502,0.011368067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019594352,0.00081419485,0.00061602955,0.00659637,0.00097574823,0.00056793104,0.0046540895,0.0010764827,0.001549063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005747368,0.00013900238,0.009532973,0.00016612042,0.0006478368,0.0114854295,0.0050828233,0.0008942725,0.00040687862,0.518514,0.17185162,0.28070432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017660628,0.00055465003,0.005486955,0.00021153151,0.0002683027,0.0005247436,0.0029062822,0.0048963064,0.00024463574,0.057486303,0.9245168,0.0011374516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11161791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04246392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75266516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092377905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033185428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767505012","doi":"10.5406/amerjpsyc.130.4.0505","title":"Between Pink Noise and White Noise: A Digital History of <i>The American Journal of Psychology</i> and <i>Psychological Review</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Group cohesiveness; Reading (process); White (mutation); White noise; Noise (video); Psychological research; Social psychology; Statistics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4051001427254156,"score_gpt":0.5601568046886629,"score_spread":0.1550566619632473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767505012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577569,0.011716902,0.00085499603,0.025519224,0.0011491738,0.00015613624,0.000027636717,0.0000028783993,0.0028161781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97614324,0.017855374,0.00072932965,0.004686741,0.00032253104,0.0000013695271,1.8014728e-7,0.000016498561,0.0002447337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928389,0.0011307244,0.0019835362,0.00048542605,0.0030352506,0.0005261143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841069,0.002266689,0.0092217205,0.0016912338,0.0022108029,0.0005026552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017655479,0.00025247876,0.0015953057,0.0046523325,0.00024940138,0.00034950438,0.005832327,0.00007517672,0.00006886436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012421209,0.00012325405,0.0004525285,0.010808469,0.008808531,0.0005235221,0.0006863534,0.0011273408,0.000010507286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045347828,0.00020882516,0.36487272,0.00000819189,0.00008983417,0.000034102388,0.00017666256,6.0319144e-7,0.0013262804,0.000014262959,0.087725624,0.5450894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009934036,0.0044122664,0.915799,0.0001139704,0.000076512006,0.0019494145,0.0001473011,0.0000031401833,0.000010660268,0.0022248097,0.07411838,0.000151136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013119173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014674758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55092627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006876704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018603812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768805826","doi":"10.1007/s00167-017-4801-6","title":"Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995–2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Medicine; Sports medicine; Arthroscopy; Orthopedic surgery; Family medicine; General surgery; Physical therapy; Surgery","score_opus":0.9695522713062247,"score_gpt":0.7202800005152287,"score_spread":0.249272270790996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768805826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11551493,0.8750742,0.000039764745,0.00027077642,0.007514886,0.00093064795,0.00032781728,0.00005388735,0.000273064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19302432,0.80531,0.00045493583,0.000024996318,0.00011105178,0.000113870316,0.00005498843,0.00009528096,0.00081055454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652862,0.0038392227,0.015675088,0.003976984,0.0087280655,0.0024944546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9038505,0.076568775,0.011665912,0.004167482,0.0026095277,0.0011378311],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.112379424,0.0015796212,0.020066641,0.08619701,0.00047858641,0.00043499708,0.0027685899,0.0027960376,0.00074289297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1070559,0.0011095399,0.00341346,0.051943608,0.007886306,0.0014104813,0.0014054168,0.0023159839,0.00005550121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012155467,0.00040405005,0.44911286,0.0026263706,0.00021044673,0.0006859153,0.00014957965,6.588987e-7,1.3060802e-7,0.00010472797,0.010274703,0.536309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797722,0.000398796,0.41121003,0.02784475,0.0005907826,0.0013141521,0.00042890784,0.000033118733,0.000022970506,0.0025733602,0.55271983,0.0018835093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027861606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050266564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013581433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035672733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773035543","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v10i4.394","title":"Incentivizing Peer Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Bodywork; Peer review; Certification; Medical education; Technical peer review; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.6717042853872577,"score_gpt":0.7150705398290771,"score_spread":0.04336625444181941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773035543","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018427938,0.083198205,0.0010583347,0.1195107,0.74470305,0.00057103834,0.000080072474,0.00001126141,0.050848916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034223665,0.20158418,0.0021748368,0.0013044379,0.668972,0.00005996387,0.00011718736,0.000092796756,0.122272246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88304156,0.0048851366,0.0027664131,0.0010217312,0.1073284,0.0009567821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3709336,0.12789851,0.012418746,0.004196787,0.48305228,0.0015000723],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27903664,0.00042713896,0.0010358792,0.037431512,0.00080101175,0.015717303,0.019513482,0.00073295867,0.0024658255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.777889,0.00031903468,0.00073261536,0.021947253,0.000511855,0.004677694,0.0020051317,0.0070060254,0.0010095835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023279959,0.0006125746,0.00014934954,0.000049830094,0.00035025817,0.00009803362,0.00010655264,0.0000012220102,0.000023616756,0.00021922636,0.724441,0.27371556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044731313,0.00021788353,0.00026462905,0.0019556207,0.000105002735,0.00010266582,0.00076390954,0.00002410167,0.000018496998,0.008516398,0.9873029,0.0002810862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029589888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016500542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51210797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018639887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020070717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773409128","doi":"10.1002/asi.23985","title":"A critical evaluation of expert survey‐based journal rankings: The role of personal research interests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Intellectual capital; Journal ranking; eHealth; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Library science; Health care; Citation","score_opus":0.5920249208423625,"score_gpt":0.6326843248149483,"score_spread":0.04065940397258583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773409128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804023,0.0003443561,0.0007620141,0.016178142,0.0007518552,0.00028428977,0.000022421564,0.0000019654665,0.0012526837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999645,0.000045585482,0.0002117619,0.00004115956,0.000033520257,0.0000037891807,1.603114e-7,0.0000014694849,0.00001754789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822625,0.0004887002,0.001083123,0.0001076452,0.015743254,0.0003148089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9020095,0.0061367718,0.0031853968,0.00044693705,0.08813331,0.000088104425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25759104,0.000055097553,0.00020956805,0.017330013,0.0016196985,0.001932667,0.0037416331,0.00012194,0.000015739375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.582463,0.000027105338,0.000108251275,0.023582134,0.0014626205,0.003293087,0.00047011717,0.00044401287,0.000002268661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306423,0.0001107925,0.4902573,0.000007379828,0.000036693335,1.3269965e-7,0.0021757975,0.00003958304,0.0050394814,0.011677766,0.0051377136,0.48538673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020036353,0.00063533784,0.75222445,0.000078152414,0.000027933846,0.000042885018,0.009082547,0.06943925,0.029059293,0.119723074,0.017576896,0.00010657701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024994582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014017179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48528016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037001056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017587153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774127519","doi":"10.4224/12340916","title":"National Research Council Canada: annual report 2006-2007: financial statements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research council; Business; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8148328827537024,"score_gpt":0.650017250377239,"score_spread":0.16481563237646335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774127519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16274914,0.00036985293,0.0076449867,0.0025031832,0.003154422,0.0005089339,0.000514274,0.000034435405,0.8225208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671821,0.000028657458,0.0010595024,0.00069050805,0.00055679545,0.000009629962,0.000009525668,0.000012344331,0.13045098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.81534666,0.00023406335,0.0014705857,0.0010490475,0.18033467,0.0015649444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7511216,0.010116247,0.00033353583,0.0009846285,0.23629667,0.0011473199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.39618024,0.00013949616,0.00024229387,0.027723603,0.0006155632,0.0010452038,0.0020742011,0.00012280274,0.0031947105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45896348,0.000099791425,0.00007402894,0.15877588,0.00022317343,0.00078577024,0.00074933073,0.0005030045,0.00056222687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032770684,0.00008732234,0.016755348,0.000001095212,0.000005367957,0.00049804355,0.000036078454,0.000017073104,0.000022238815,0.0020089431,0.9671328,0.013402919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029308474,0.000064415464,0.125381,0.0000017154634,5.590495e-7,0.00003417714,0.0004012608,0.00022706387,0.00013780128,0.005423205,0.8679119,0.00012387596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4037472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7631289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009136652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05866032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775516587","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2593-6","title":"Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Relation (database); Citation database; Visibility; Citation analysis; Computer science; Database; Citation impact; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Scopus; Sociology; Geography; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.4570312116954996,"score_gpt":0.6150197274678524,"score_spread":0.1579885157723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775516587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921231,0.00024248712,0.0003370418,0.00097448274,0.0019005104,0.0009372737,0.00020027017,0.000009458673,0.0032753695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940544,0.000045318433,0.00006423931,0.00014719885,0.000031486896,0.000013333337,0.0000070330225,0.000013713205,0.00027224587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587404,0.0017289486,0.0011571341,0.0011931257,0.036023866,0.0011565202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95961416,0.023175828,0.0021851638,0.0063910736,0.008257183,0.00037661582],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2244995,0.00028395472,0.00046045138,0.12177536,0.0037416134,0.015463735,0.016700862,0.00009725178,0.00011205795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2981451,0.00011081327,0.00027942008,0.5253583,0.008851208,0.0026728292,0.0016753853,0.00058482157,0.000078387035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113147355,0.00030028395,0.9568405,0.000035317855,0.000018989518,0.0000079387855,0.0017323726,0.0018985745,0.015025116,0.0015512467,0.0034718497,0.019004663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014675295,0.00069202296,0.9217571,0.00011587703,0.000027569311,0.0000085825,0.0027048727,0.031225316,0.031818394,0.0012038321,0.0087111,0.00026777934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081091886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006985458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.403583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003891235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017638543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775559600","doi":"","title":"Structure, Change over Time, and Outcomes of Research Collaboration Networks: The Case of GRAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grand Challenges; Data science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24187908306715933,"score_gpt":0.5126841484973699,"score_spread":0.27080506543021055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775559600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873529,0.0030954846,0.0000513926,0.00024971436,0.0002723675,0.00051693124,0.00017133044,0.0000048597,0.008285006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894647,0.0010186117,0.00015728732,0.0000046276728,0.0000340485,3.7545288e-7,0.00003867603,0.000008339612,0.009273333],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509275,0.00049832574,0.0002916105,0.00042226934,0.0034152947,0.00027976415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906995,0.003192604,0.0006801369,0.00066508347,0.0046196776,0.00014298216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077631567,0.00014193828,0.00056912185,0.006467296,0.00031613873,0.00015971484,0.0012008243,0.00028370146,0.0042172996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031041212,0.00010393053,0.00012152341,0.018119207,0.00041646097,0.0005535524,0.00031792023,0.00024085506,0.0000036693673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022039732,0.00041603055,0.07902564,0.00056642445,0.00064889167,0.00019327045,0.056387108,0.00014671491,0.0018894132,0.005672945,0.04593531,0.80691427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075432495,0.00032942364,0.96296346,0.000047322937,0.000056544483,0.000004904675,0.027422134,0.0067477142,0.00015386411,0.0004588382,0.00089566724,0.00016581973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101217255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20449223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009941463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001500317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99669296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776998048","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v4n5a3264","title":"Modelling A Cooperative Approach to Open Access Scholarly Publishing: A Demonstration in the Canadian Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Political science; Open access publishing; Humanities; Library science; Revenue; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.8375792362507936,"score_gpt":0.5907971859553747,"score_spread":0.2467820502954189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776998048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45544106,0.0020610355,0.026899902,0.15624997,0.00043018375,0.0016266843,0.000069244365,0.0000025949255,0.3572193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996322,0.00004722155,0.0021110273,0.0012924072,0.000033865752,0.000013257964,0.000005217882,0.0000057551724,0.00016926361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956066,0.0008531278,0.0007046495,0.0002171119,0.0022155996,0.0004028853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98751295,0.0010340167,0.0006284984,0.001833605,0.007693022,0.0012978909],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045055117,0.00009158708,0.00022668249,0.023851704,0.0026635588,0.24050519,0.033031847,0.000117043404,0.000045114797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055743396,0.0000615457,0.00005651232,0.022291254,0.00019026741,0.028143113,0.0005952385,0.00096365495,0.000018020639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007282635,0.00017813647,0.31967464,0.0000043150267,0.000059966223,0.00008595448,0.021300638,0.0553848,0.000019557452,0.1703063,0.1323818,0.30053106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017643126,0.00024145078,0.46205822,0.00015743628,0.000017000995,0.00016111435,0.015701806,0.17564808,0.000047357236,0.0551262,0.2885763,0.0005007141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8388195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9773084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5408809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067985145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009154991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778419273","doi":"10.1111/ejn.13814","title":"Mapping international impact of Danish neuroscience from 2004 to 2015 using tailored scientometric methodology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"European Journal of Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H. Lundbeck A/S; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Novo Nordisk; Lundbeckfonden","keywords":"Danish; Neuroscience; Psychology","score_opus":0.7364387941043548,"score_gpt":0.6235921305892304,"score_spread":0.1128466635151244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778419273","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113570474,0.0005919035,0.07887997,0.00031797317,0.80445784,0.00028541998,0.0006370639,0.000015642348,0.0012437011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60824335,0.0015232111,0.034480873,0.00040756125,0.3518623,0.0000023981315,0.000015777361,0.00022130266,0.0032432307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95938873,0.0038020296,0.0035225763,0.0021973983,0.029685467,0.001403777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628158,0.010207347,0.007787023,0.0024305636,0.014986351,0.0017728894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08395946,0.0005917455,0.0015377018,0.11556323,0.0007369034,0.007029096,0.028432824,0.00022056597,0.000119514894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5106639,0.00042548793,0.001001274,0.12475984,0.0015384336,0.0029678722,0.005014771,0.0019317933,0.00007692133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014228973,0.00020943389,0.0039589,0.00000632422,0.000021213129,0.0008020715,0.00026666935,0.0043182448,0.25925788,0.0000031055629,0.7165382,0.014475689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001296474,0.0025573121,0.26381102,0.00023672842,0.00003838219,0.00017754578,0.00011316342,0.0069282562,0.00065931276,0.0003110521,0.7230976,0.00077313115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001886953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029634398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49467283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005858403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035246417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781044009","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.005","title":"On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Citation; Citation analysis; Altmetrics; Discipline; Web of science; Set (abstract data type); Citation impact","score_opus":0.4491389199918624,"score_gpt":0.49777142617191705,"score_spread":0.04863250618005466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781044009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939219,0.0001248581,0.0022154434,0.00022388055,0.00014610111,0.000082073064,0.000112263064,0.000001427921,0.0031720856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987865,0.00027238522,0.00081554515,0.000011951695,0.000015754127,5.328227e-7,0.0000029553614,0.0000022041047,0.000092150534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931503,0.000096676646,0.0011151342,0.00016244117,0.005285262,0.00019020835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817904,0.0054090098,0.0017132147,0.000370009,0.010542318,0.00017501823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03880285,0.000065190834,0.00029894317,0.26318964,0.00032209186,0.00070976914,0.0009078757,0.00006207877,0.00008298349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055954557,0.000038882026,0.00010066127,0.5223318,0.0014569421,0.00094682333,0.0001484987,0.00020054523,0.0000030396816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012159795,0.0000655792,0.97889674,0.0000084560625,0.00008784457,7.866167e-8,0.00052524096,0.000002166752,0.00023131889,0.007932939,0.0017284163,0.010509042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016808382,0.00022137139,0.99130833,0.000015346699,0.00009359846,0.0000011023924,0.0009438558,0.0026903632,0.0002791467,0.0027857246,0.0014506887,0.00004241627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062309646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050641333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25914213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034745724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036180936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98975474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781928277","doi":"10.1177/0844562117748287","title":"Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Scholarship; Publish or perish; Public relations; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9005290747628881,"score_gpt":0.7058359562956766,"score_spread":0.1946931184672115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781928277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330186,0.000583356,0.0004952242,0.13523103,0.0020126111,0.0005543754,0.00006613058,0.0000023986247,0.02803628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605876,0.00001687573,0.00036775932,0.00023080186,0.00041634456,0.000002788159,7.1277026e-7,0.000014947908,0.002891001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617643,0.0011678053,0.0007439108,0.00042808996,0.010229427,0.0012543278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650381,0.004076635,0.00040479592,0.0011492926,0.026140695,0.0031904592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09420071,0.00011400304,0.0003427144,0.059263907,0.0010264233,0.052859068,0.025058167,0.00011811729,0.00050624297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10429769,0.00006547175,0.00012215243,0.13331033,0.0017005515,0.0060839984,0.0012013206,0.0010796544,0.000070251204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007426355,0.000036679037,0.02096965,0.0000028135564,0.0000146328,0.000051164156,0.002641534,0.000012142705,0.00079525996,0.000555408,0.71948624,0.25536022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011227737,0.0023393123,0.3512808,0.0009290738,0.000013569083,0.0002105379,0.016979845,0.00043495515,0.012621855,0.06434714,0.5493449,0.00037521948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005833804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002541041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33031118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096220814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064383214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782047141","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.145","title":"Special Section on the Future University Press in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Special section; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; History; Literature; Archaeology; Engineering; Engineering physics","score_opus":0.32807171846348404,"score_gpt":0.42329114030668996,"score_spread":0.09521942184320592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782047141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91331935,0.00011654626,0.00011125612,0.02444896,0.010294075,0.000065908,0.000009240834,0.0000019121283,0.051632755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815317,0.0000789129,0.0001259877,0.00057351927,0.019614002,8.016791e-8,1.8061053e-7,0.0000043035125,0.0014498594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98922116,0.00047644856,0.00047489142,0.0002138878,0.009315656,0.0002979659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878004,0.0024971475,0.0005716716,0.00033785947,0.00849707,0.0002958078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033829805,0.000071565875,0.00016124759,0.016519416,0.00033172732,0.040093336,0.0034941942,0.00009738323,0.0003297454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05203725,0.000040498275,0.00007542862,0.06218791,0.000054156324,0.034375764,0.0003353534,0.0018278329,0.0000068156774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000799608,0.000029831011,0.11268304,5.3570056e-7,0.000008560331,0.00007064649,0.00013957504,0.000030111756,0.000048409296,0.0023222887,0.83665353,0.047933523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023982229,0.00009142397,0.28285882,0.000008523101,0.0000014096819,0.00001654244,0.003118985,0.000105319545,0.000064907996,0.00039310975,0.7130576,0.000043552784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1401079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36608624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22597834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013267103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020826769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487555},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2782500721","doi":"10.11575/prism/20","title":"Avoiding Predatory Journals and Questionable Conferences: A Resource Guide","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Political science; Business; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.30987310440579063,"score_gpt":0.4451281990108951,"score_spread":0.1352550946051045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782500721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218303,0.0015282722,0.34114733,0.0011750655,0.00014283005,0.00016313547,0.0000022931497,0.000027495626,0.13398325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420747,0.0006465432,0.025344921,0.00010375834,0.000044894063,1.6455373e-7,0.0000016008823,0.000006632009,0.031776763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561673,0.00035235667,0.00025608213,0.00039984097,0.0030819497,0.00029305575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954854,0.0017055807,0.0002544954,0.0003534986,0.0018478429,0.0003531824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014124593,0.00008136744,0.00022299595,0.013094096,0.0006984648,0.0004139409,0.0012570495,0.00010829677,0.0013837067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010303648,0.00007347436,0.000068611516,0.018273324,0.0006109289,0.00062864233,0.00073028705,0.00027416664,0.000115014656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007293562,0.000087991655,0.06852769,0.000011896797,0.000036224177,0.000046496847,0.0015671653,5.1806467e-7,0.0015749951,0.0064490447,0.10849897,0.8131261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000679555,0.00025641595,0.16038603,0.000053015247,0.000013446709,0.000021671965,0.0018738344,0.035631824,0.00061119214,0.014492591,0.78577924,0.0002012062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006137599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000135571445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81292486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005055039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025584956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784275186","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4","title":"Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Frontier; Work (physics); Position (finance); China; Political science; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Data science; Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Law; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.6933349039972806,"score_gpt":0.6011293296615132,"score_spread":0.09220557433576737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784275186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979332,0.0031797665,0.033309385,0.00050351897,0.022732448,0.0012125255,0.003409441,0.00012341453,0.037596337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709293,0.00014907883,0.008144205,0.000034747714,0.0003484687,0.000033022603,0.00025339396,0.000044873294,0.020062868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555929,0.0005347067,0.0024249677,0.0030055528,0.036915086,0.0015267918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462385,0.00840401,0.0020214678,0.0048170937,0.037091125,0.0014277706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053577498,0.0005760624,0.0011582659,0.52635723,0.0015819465,0.012970526,0.011868752,0.0007754094,0.0027281912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19140348,0.00044042733,0.0009515544,0.701194,0.0028271282,0.0010429792,0.009692999,0.0011652807,0.0010479243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002664888,0.0022581255,0.39396006,0.00017011739,0.00018895455,0.000013743357,0.0023504826,0.0005941267,0.0017739418,0.0058294428,0.5652619,0.027572457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013401198,0.000727473,0.58576685,0.0002724732,0.00019471029,0.000010501634,0.0017085158,0.017906899,0.018023362,0.09850065,0.27316105,0.002387385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112900176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042762713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29210085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000673702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024070058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988663},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2786208824","doi":"10.7577/seminar.2417","title":"Editorial Seminar.net Issue 3 Vol. 6","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar net","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Enthusiasm; Value (mathematics); Media studies; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2142401471411202,"score_gpt":0.5231949041981997,"score_spread":0.30895475705707953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786208824","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41104522,0.0008222465,0.00038229514,0.0023208337,0.5189543,0.000592424,0.00020670782,0.00015185779,0.06552411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57937694,0.00031307762,0.003452386,0.0004490974,0.28481108,0.000042791555,0.000048360616,0.00006847454,0.13143782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98670316,0.00014654359,0.00067840394,0.0010115681,0.01051709,0.00094325276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898269,0.0037969237,0.00024050663,0.0014771463,0.0038964741,0.0007620532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017515134,0.00024155987,0.00038642384,0.021261323,0.0003539845,0.002432847,0.003540512,0.0004187233,0.0064129517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056109335,0.0001758235,0.00018236619,0.08530234,0.0003083104,0.000627329,0.000998082,0.00096812786,0.0067465827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024050729,0.00008865787,0.0057377256,0.000002418437,0.000005518136,0.00001402204,0.000115129726,0.000002722238,0.009952922,0.00018890906,0.9231012,0.06076674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003284905,0.00021841095,0.00337251,0.000005146833,0.000004948699,0.000010968324,0.00019696797,0.00077931734,0.004583565,0.0035459497,0.9867124,0.00024130312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016597622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004733922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23414321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005485937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023684195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787759455","doi":"10.3844/jssp.2018.55.64","title":"Research Impact, the ‘New Academic Capital’: An Environmental Scan of Research Impact Indicators and Resources for the Humanities and Social Sciences across 32 Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Social impact; Political science; Disadvantage; Economic impact analysis; Work (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.661923208667436,"score_gpt":0.6681282858787989,"score_spread":0.006205077211362875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787759455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886413,0.004702031,0.000017945991,0.0055335187,0.00020277205,0.00033284107,0.00010171378,0.0000034275834,0.00046445473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974378,0.0007976373,0.00005763807,0.00009402794,0.0012942489,0.0000044865324,2.248453e-7,0.000007899154,0.00030606866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805213,0.0012171242,0.0008874515,0.0005246874,0.015565889,0.00128354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98197114,0.01490258,0.00083428546,0.0002066825,0.0018654632,0.00021984393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16251145,0.00017385029,0.00041553262,0.0130488165,0.015328347,0.0065382738,0.0049245637,0.00018374156,0.00018545441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008423046,0.000075983415,0.00020046216,0.040319547,0.048534527,0.0018384287,0.0011860232,0.0009944502,0.0000054753996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006221086,0.00020897541,0.5390909,0.000022894696,0.00015768711,0.0000053048534,0.24741778,0.000014759222,0.0037201433,0.009045328,0.069892466,0.12980168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004700336,0.00374201,0.74715096,0.000017912089,0.000012426018,0.00003321391,0.20388447,0.00020844242,0.0006328688,0.020459214,0.023238776,0.00014970009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094374846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025212698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20806006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025486844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017675476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788604854","doi":"10.7717/peerj.4269","title":"Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Stratification (seeds); Open access publishing; Prestige; Inequality; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.9274457685568921,"score_gpt":0.7581399849400745,"score_spread":0.16930578361681758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788604854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94929117,0.00028520997,0.0012480805,0.028750274,0.00065656146,0.0005453066,0.00009191127,0.0000044628227,0.019127034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990725,0.000025477553,0.00041332564,0.000082561215,0.00019891324,0.000012458982,0.000003514465,0.000001751735,0.00018948567],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929559,0.00082713284,0.00057661254,0.00051425816,0.004720707,0.00040535652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991411,0.002952776,0.00018571492,0.00060642284,0.0045841346,0.00026000044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08937218,0.000055543274,0.00016195349,0.008500763,0.00063830067,0.017846268,0.0046557114,0.00006610738,0.00019189123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07427527,0.000032656106,0.00002170078,0.13204688,0.0007841915,0.0034751093,0.0031087478,0.00027948385,0.000023967768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070598406,0.00014423624,0.114081234,0.000005229185,0.0000042872243,0.000031368007,0.0004131913,0.000009251618,0.000041377705,0.24994287,0.090429775,0.54482657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059262855,0.00022750288,0.7968393,0.00000934473,7.1963996e-7,0.0000899003,0.001250638,0.007074707,0.000086011125,0.17387286,0.019888576,0.000067788525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015069672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010129803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6827581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022433422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017333142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99148905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789541004","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23165","title":"Chemical engineering research synergies across scientific categories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Curriculum; Chemical reaction engineering; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Chemistry; Library science; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.3623810731150262,"score_gpt":0.4945005040236328,"score_spread":0.13211943090860662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789541004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99543524,0.0009127375,0.0006131272,0.001252271,0.0014780227,0.00007878712,0.000013513116,0.000013252278,0.00020306568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813914,0.0000025078314,0.000727563,0.000021081298,0.0008256915,0.0000027330545,8.435084e-7,0.00002210285,0.00025831372],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189067,0.00006431151,0.0007756486,0.0003649844,0.005533287,0.001371075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879988,0.00321339,0.00015671382,0.00073085347,0.006354313,0.001545962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026535591,0.00017207157,0.00033057455,0.01298425,0.00056623196,0.0048174486,0.003955085,0.00016103673,0.00017515618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05752427,0.00011026464,0.00017831034,0.056267057,0.0012049848,0.00049422705,0.00036021622,0.0011703883,0.00012639358],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040907296,0.000041884017,0.0028220238,0.000033499808,0.00010419708,0.00021349893,0.004730482,0.0044289706,0.9258675,0.0073443092,0.03785602,0.016516715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047511832,0.00011654986,0.0013100674,0.00009188117,0.00001090021,0.00037306422,0.00042758093,0.037213787,0.86076564,0.0033339127,0.095433906,0.00044757023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079031556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014644137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065101825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000511651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00130604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790065445","doi":"10.1177/0539018418763131","title":"«  <i>Une bombe dans la discipline </i> » : l’émergence du mouvement génopolitique en science politique","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18553571869742366,"score_gpt":0.5464111860628246,"score_spread":0.3608754673654009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790065445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65537786,0.0000041072017,0.01517682,0.0048380108,0.00095140137,0.0003357565,0.000046451616,0.00006821413,0.3232014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794304,0.000033434524,0.00072695257,0.0005278058,0.00039849762,0.000023497947,0.0000034918428,0.000005193356,0.0003380618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832127,0.00017664868,0.0010056733,0.00063444785,0.013631544,0.0013389846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902035,0.0008320948,0.00046177328,0.0006147796,0.007201108,0.0006867381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048197348,0.00019620454,0.00023559328,0.020589765,0.003609278,0.0054055103,0.0053619677,0.00012410447,0.00028477795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028539987,0.00014662519,0.00010673997,0.2261759,0.008065317,0.011944997,0.0018275868,0.00027722542,0.0007169052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031981668,0.00019767488,0.045051042,0.000011006652,0.000006029425,0.0000037946818,0.056785703,0.0000389909,0.020741876,0.7213359,0.008854039,0.14694199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005870329,0.00040303322,0.706157,0.000016568785,0.0000068778295,0.00002570414,0.035702866,0.021799602,0.041183703,0.13140705,0.06201505,0.0006954619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013318395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010675646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.661106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010008649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023376402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078137","doi":"10.1177/2292550317749508","title":"An Evaluation of h-Index as a Measure of Research Productivity Among Canadian Academic Plastic Surgeons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Scopus; Index (typography); Univariate; Test (biology); Productivity; Medicine; Multivariate statistics; Metric (unit); Psychology; Statistics; Mann–Whitney U test; Medical education; Mathematics; Operations management; MEDLINE; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.7151227388252344,"score_gpt":0.5891069335293433,"score_spread":0.12601580529589107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790078137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941503,0.00017264129,0.000372465,0.00009914386,0.0034832004,0.00031669112,0.00007314227,0.000014504178,0.0013179459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960244,0.0000175988,0.000014457197,0.000003052925,0.00023526934,0.000027920101,0.000007121678,0.000017624567,0.00007453836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696336,0.002651513,0.0011978699,0.0010474422,0.024319973,0.001149652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7245535,0.22740231,0.0008053973,0.0021160014,0.043187603,0.0019351314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17763692,0.00017972123,0.00058066205,0.088589504,0.00036170703,0.00030590713,0.0015785595,0.0002863065,0.0014691617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7375123,0.00014284221,0.0001527639,0.1469327,0.0014293676,0.0007868828,0.00022865045,0.00065264554,0.00023432859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007827462,0.00012181555,0.967305,0.000012009265,0.000022117272,0.0000067370147,0.0001558292,0.0001932874,0.0014020121,0.00007629766,0.0056754905,0.024951136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017229503,0.00015833124,0.9599447,0.00006603309,0.000016832968,0.0000065767044,0.00031382806,0.032845005,0.0040146927,0.0018435216,0.00046756992,0.0001505818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061771035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059863668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55987537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003585426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006648514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790320647","doi":"10.1177/0539018417752089","title":"Authorship, citations, acknowledgments and visibility in social media: Symbolic capital in the multifaceted reward system of science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Impact Fund; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Reward system; Sociology; Symbolic capital; Foundation (evidence); Social media; Social capital; Visibility; Perception; Science communication; Public relations; Dissemination; Data science; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.33461530882784657,"score_gpt":0.5405144087401722,"score_spread":0.20589909991232563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790320647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99067533,0.000013370426,0.00017612644,0.00037052343,0.0004779999,0.00035007801,0.000018902943,0.0000106711805,0.007906974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972063,0.0000031858365,0.0001447083,0.000033909084,0.00007546185,0.000013027662,0.0000017369271,0.0000014699418,0.0000058758474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933905,0.00026982708,0.0009388372,0.00036385254,0.008483943,0.0006044871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404645,0.0012222078,0.00039260715,0.00026458752,0.0039328383,0.00014131523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07007492,0.0000964405,0.00021096475,0.025370687,0.0014468622,0.0017203641,0.0024031505,0.00009917794,0.000018156594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047975667,0.0000640709,0.00004069537,0.17996787,0.005526597,0.005202236,0.00048388963,0.0002244894,0.00007360358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051497147,0.00016615144,0.20819277,0.000044798817,0.0000025172562,0.0000010621965,0.51438403,0.0000054596107,0.0025490944,0.062397476,0.0005522227,0.21165292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032599832,0.00004199468,0.91676676,0.000010214416,0.000001179919,9.438364e-7,0.07126955,0.0049347375,0.00044413275,0.006040345,0.00008050979,0.00008365192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015774489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015758026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70857394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005134544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007955331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790387137","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.1006","title":"Publication trends in spine research from 2007 to 2016: Comparison of the Orthopaedic Research Society Spine Section and the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOR Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; National Institutes of Health; Orthopaedic Research Society","keywords":"SPINE (molecular biology); Lumbar spine; Medicine; Workforce; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Surgery; Computer science; Law; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.5948204341850184,"score_gpt":0.621151133199973,"score_spread":0.02633069901495455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790387137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507227,0.00085352926,0.0017447993,0.042114288,0.0013383501,0.0022435402,0.000057633457,0.000008779935,0.00091635453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906153,0.00021772685,0.00086303405,0.00024681733,0.00090106245,0.00018567979,0.000008594623,0.000015771378,0.0069459775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854402,0.0008520502,0.0012966313,0.00081195735,0.010938365,0.0006607735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851224,0.0025261065,0.00053448725,0.0017712378,0.0098856455,0.00016014221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.072893195,0.0001707962,0.00041805318,0.006129797,0.0011460168,0.00089685636,0.004817388,0.00015204994,0.00029514515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029823102,0.00007005028,0.00043457295,0.09984793,0.0016507775,0.00031337977,0.0030151205,0.0010142443,0.000011950902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002758272,0.0018779257,0.16393931,0.000019421837,0.00025111597,2.1957297e-7,0.0068799555,0.00012441333,0.0146875605,0.0012363516,0.6024575,0.20825039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027571558,0.00087839,0.8923962,0.000032132823,0.000015959631,6.482984e-7,0.0055424357,0.04518308,0.0013440583,0.00075035833,0.051010124,0.00008942352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020955228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023164665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7284569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024660968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032004883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790464658","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2216","title":"Effective Practices and Strategies for Open Access Outreach: A Qualitative Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Outreach; Jargon; Public relations; Influencer marketing; Qualitative research; Relevance (law); Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.854673664994753,"score_gpt":0.7095175612684768,"score_spread":0.1451561037262762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790464658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482656,0.00263482,0.003960293,0.0040700524,0.00011545302,0.0010561437,0.000011412462,0.0000045658367,0.0033207235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941939,0.00027853565,0.005092981,0.00012791374,0.00008143734,0.00003955622,0.0000010937647,0.000007357167,0.00017718735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375904,0.0031638152,0.00075785985,0.00028739398,0.0018499385,0.00018197716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731099,0.019519279,0.0019706097,0.00064211764,0.0045162016,0.00024186254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057188634,0.00010849184,0.0003433911,0.008690367,0.0006771921,0.07715146,0.0055810465,0.00007925932,0.000027579574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051695302,0.00007023242,0.000051074137,0.01586103,0.00026100167,0.053103317,0.0023480228,0.00049587677,0.0000030976614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015838598,0.0012019823,0.4465255,0.000018760442,0.00029739516,0.000006160706,0.20588012,0.0000011506495,0.0005184907,0.03134305,0.0075258226,0.3050977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021373886,0.003116582,0.5211443,0.000034728655,0.000040973267,0.000018307335,0.24250078,0.00019396227,0.00011722348,0.22277127,0.0077856733,0.0001388637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017215883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009865713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30495885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002954003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036381133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790580186","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2018.1455659","title":"Evolving models of collaborative drug discovery: managing intellectual capital assets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Drug discovery; Business; Intellectual capital; Drug; Knowledge management; Data science; Computer science; Finance; Pharmacology; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.17801551159691334,"score_gpt":0.4871169826697052,"score_spread":0.30910147107279184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790580186","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007339903,0.018892461,0.0057306555,0.0008455062,0.9512699,0.0011021626,0.002897228,0.00008383122,0.011838332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19374532,0.04139206,0.00086987583,0.00026315017,0.70834076,0.00023625318,0.0014210398,0.00036058907,0.053370968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683738,0.0011065948,0.0021875843,0.0028420864,0.024127372,0.0013625615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539139,0.03375155,0.0016536776,0.0026125177,0.007490924,0.0005773958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013983241,0.0009774215,0.0017741545,0.0438259,0.0005954439,0.009475886,0.0061945887,0.0007417792,0.00059217424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07349611,0.00072583166,0.0007465048,0.071648724,0.0008769929,0.006790853,0.003027661,0.0015264458,0.0004162289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002872546,0.00037647955,0.000042238495,0.000027980885,0.000117880976,0.000011991725,0.004713071,0.00028274732,0.00004885447,0.0005865214,0.99039036,0.0031146246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012681903,0.00061734614,0.000047756246,0.00069129746,0.000009363895,0.0000015424495,0.0091177,0.008599212,0.0016466912,0.008474241,0.9681893,0.0013373676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007470938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007627634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24292918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091085146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002747354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790914095","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000002585","title":"Authorship Trends in Spine Publications From 2000 to 2015","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Demography; Medicine; History; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8175322235307786,"score_gpt":0.6776906944510808,"score_spread":0.13984152907969782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790914095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032839667,0.9791739,0.0006623093,0.0030418604,0.0010735894,0.00049269234,0.00043547552,0.000046231813,0.015041097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000027824542,0.89495945,0.00313768,0.000108516964,0.00075222686,0.0001295347,0.0003519707,0.000041132673,0.10049164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98752004,0.0005076962,0.0019357706,0.0017837036,0.007263381,0.0009894081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926574,0.0009940789,0.0005628624,0.0025347297,0.0021016493,0.0011492684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020928316,0.00043312812,0.0017642598,0.21508582,0.00014364126,0.0028368453,0.00605135,0.000523613,0.011067616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038013775,0.00028673006,0.0005321243,0.4919985,0.00013939715,0.00042458109,0.0014255467,0.00072401436,0.010187943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.001421e-7,0.00007256639,0.0000751829,0.000030193014,0.000011421679,0.0000040082255,0.000022050732,2.3164061e-7,2.6304434e-7,0.00017510443,0.24807863,0.7515296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013366152,0.00012298234,0.006536952,0.00043741,0.000025168309,0.0000027568829,0.0000066385164,0.000045269495,5.9645635e-7,0.0011848308,0.99117523,0.0003284912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040392886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000391141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75120103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005460651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009186984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791388250","doi":"10.7202/1058277ar","title":"La gestion des conflits d'intérêt dans un jury de thèse de doctorat","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5908077542865994,"score_gpt":0.5419813837979655,"score_spread":0.04882637048863392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791388250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857729,0.0012537983,0.003562102,0.0029381043,0.0005944939,0.00007778882,0.000036795314,0.0000041656544,0.0057598655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641305,0.00027691864,0.0017620894,0.00036786066,0.000100805875,5.1241017e-7,7.4698306e-7,0.00001078025,0.0010672421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514276,0.0007121244,0.00058202853,0.0002285367,0.0026568978,0.00067763496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895943,0.004065085,0.00032860826,0.00037897896,0.0035577347,0.00207534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037217822,0.00011588678,0.00024537463,0.021188466,0.00027025837,0.0018392471,0.0016863898,0.00036828467,0.0006379248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036979914,0.00008641584,0.00015224141,0.033272848,0.00078654784,0.00047778068,0.0000676371,0.0011584673,0.00016584061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035065805,0.000044361565,0.74072033,0.000022799892,0.000044244993,0.0006409049,0.005829452,0.0004870376,0.0035425702,0.012631222,0.0075555346,0.22844645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008046663,0.0005379352,0.83222675,0.00011262987,0.000022406439,0.0009859079,0.0043517193,0.0019202364,0.0055128196,0.04171637,0.111485064,0.00032349408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072235633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010796368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22812296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007284957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054601757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791541340","doi":"10.1111/acfi.12350","title":"Drivers of research impact: evidence from the top three finance journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting and Finance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Presentation (obstetrics); Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Impact factor; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6950390697914387,"score_gpt":0.6262159828208154,"score_spread":0.06882308697062334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791541340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859147,0.010352085,0.00094768376,0.0017454227,0.00029147457,0.00013722757,0.000029844103,0.000006348733,0.0005751891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485415,0.003583973,0.0008038274,0.00006658264,0.00031784052,0.0000036253834,2.980887e-7,0.0000063089133,0.00036341362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920119,0.0001874125,0.0005510147,0.000598729,0.006026856,0.0006240989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769244,0.015541044,0.0004001925,0.0010537846,0.006008973,0.00007161261],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03640023,0.00011447127,0.00026903517,0.0057826904,0.00081194175,0.001682044,0.0027067051,0.00009935016,0.00022671404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061780382,0.00006247194,0.000096230186,0.07047792,0.001108505,0.0010396395,0.0009405553,0.00047733623,0.00015876528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002428122,0.000017061131,0.82151806,0.0000013330897,0.0000059070285,0.0000026927482,0.0003663173,0.000011410424,0.00050501904,0.0002840593,0.014895923,0.16236793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014246971,0.00012111052,0.9641181,0.0001394086,0.0000023340613,0.000002082824,0.00017207487,0.0032074328,0.00069172663,0.020018937,0.011299497,0.00008479146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001682017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013714907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16228314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045224388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002347626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791800404","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-02965-4","title":"Make supplementary reference lists visible for citation metrics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Computational biology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.5156067527836983,"score_gpt":0.6019829892015935,"score_spread":0.08637623641789527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791800404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86895925,0.0037115566,0.042411845,0.016340762,0.0078042923,0.0022664035,0.0031530159,0.00013127936,0.05522162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782856,0.00006853178,0.014928204,0.0014345209,0.00041042874,0.0000210289,0.00009806391,0.000012028971,0.0047415877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916336,0.00009630059,0.00045543502,0.0007038648,0.006570668,0.00054014346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880803,0.0040859086,0.00018953012,0.00067308,0.0067058485,0.00026530918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012558129,0.00013136049,0.00020665336,0.039153874,0.0003415781,0.0014923274,0.0019466493,0.00072291784,0.0017852974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04164217,0.00009199773,0.00010796236,0.16157214,0.00011437396,0.00031029305,0.0003595546,0.00091856753,0.0002804359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008221899,0.00010474688,0.026821448,0.000009790599,0.000017544027,0.0000027001015,0.00011009435,0.0000014010466,0.0019747077,0.010771184,0.6723261,0.28777805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058239547,0.00043305336,0.048277076,0.0000046534115,0.0000066999214,0.0000020347077,0.00019112187,0.0017961428,0.0072713434,0.028316023,0.91294724,0.00017219203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041123327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013930493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28760585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011094434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015591506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794611221","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.4987","title":"Publish and/or perish: A urological perspective on predatory publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Listing (finance); Publish or perish; Index (typography); Library science; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3476648110768687,"score_gpt":0.4850894105437658,"score_spread":0.1374245994668971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794611221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66358995,0.00036848598,0.00046208192,0.2342838,0.0012144799,0.00035776693,0.000200663,0.000067850866,0.099454895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454225,0.00009097982,0.0002486775,0.005864012,0.0007472991,0.000007786996,0.000003187422,0.0000075039934,0.008488284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928825,0.00076523464,0.0005715328,0.0006642692,0.0042040776,0.0009124045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839853,0.0038126805,0.00042801222,0.00034426752,0.009278548,0.002151213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017915234,0.00015642315,0.0002758777,0.018805392,0.0012171355,0.0068760365,0.0014808133,0.00040140862,0.007035568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20767917,0.00009375279,0.00013623449,0.04130137,0.00027838768,0.00087698014,0.00017802627,0.0009871059,0.00064472575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006251962,0.0001134456,0.6236348,3.2519458e-7,0.000039177135,0.000031209234,0.00034405495,0.000003404632,0.000009559579,0.019178687,0.3417624,0.014820447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027507124,0.0006527464,0.61633295,0.0000012345985,0.000004278634,0.000058937647,0.00050471927,0.00048912154,0.0000025143997,0.017837958,0.36372846,0.000112009235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042230941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011416958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3209523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015393455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001062703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99415493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794719542","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.4339","title":"Professionnalisation de la science","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University; Princeton University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Wayne State University; State University of New York; Stanford Bio-X; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2324248750248497,"score_gpt":0.42438766976298187,"score_spread":0.19196279473813216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794719542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03347742,0.009233772,0.004895265,0.0010180833,0.0005911347,0.0005796283,0.00013358372,0.00008295352,0.9499882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40532184,0.0018140344,0.0038662718,0.00019183115,0.0002249789,0.0000113385495,0.000011024719,0.00006251051,0.5884962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866526,0.0007563422,0.0006743007,0.0013558643,0.008892354,0.0016685345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876917,0.004109378,0.00064616394,0.0012058432,0.0042530233,0.0020938679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027396832,0.00052192266,0.00060116604,0.027128046,0.0017954713,0.002262567,0.005163226,0.0008813714,0.006626461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010708677,0.00047311242,0.00031932408,0.010242464,0.003305965,0.0007227467,0.004673979,0.0011674827,0.00067816675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061340275,0.00022093274,0.027833408,0.00013009046,0.0001535665,0.0017886219,0.007495785,0.0010143482,0.015174242,0.32663858,0.08329131,0.5356457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013360262,0.0003153671,0.028897336,0.0002788689,0.00015367121,0.0003722334,0.0012024416,0.016729452,0.003976703,0.16742207,0.7784377,0.00087814505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030961426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035933015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6951464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052827555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003452886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795529249","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2732-8","title":"Can Twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Visibility; Social media; Citation; China; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5383689152925458,"score_gpt":0.5912490065647195,"score_spread":0.052880091272173635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795529249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96969336,0.00027217172,0.0027456244,0.005366747,0.0013832361,0.0003821808,0.00008202449,0.000034952554,0.020039676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265933,0.000024721443,0.0009858559,0.00059492793,0.00025631327,0.000013127723,0.000004766575,0.000010365961,0.0054506017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97975105,0.00044550953,0.0011445164,0.0010198916,0.01682199,0.0008170138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506176,0.0114873415,0.0008553653,0.00419161,0.031827778,0.0010202732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06967175,0.00019309807,0.0003565547,0.13477136,0.00065837736,0.0026180057,0.0065782056,0.000112762595,0.0016527589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3528187,0.000097065844,0.0002302911,0.7164576,0.0017481673,0.0006596506,0.0017635167,0.00029813283,0.0005692058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014496874,0.00024895545,0.8961473,0.0000036025485,0.000011027422,6.646571e-7,0.00051791564,0.0000052859154,0.00038164636,0.0011915013,0.061440058,0.04003753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003015943,0.00018313453,0.9253265,0.0000020206844,0.0000045855654,0.0000040948344,0.00020834425,0.0039487095,0.000733805,0.019010196,0.050125718,0.00015124872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043327236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010175389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58168626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016675744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004933741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796260596","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2018.01.1236","title":"Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacy Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; University of California, Davis; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Universidade de Coimbra; Kerman University of Medical Sciences; Universiti Sains Malaysia; University of Warwick; Purdue University; North Carolina State University; Jordan University of Science and Technology; NorthShore University HealthSystem; University of Minnesota; Chapman University; University of Pittsburgh; Universitetet i Tromsø; University of Technology Sydney; North Dakota State University; RMIT University; Kaiser Permanente","keywords":"Publishing; Economic shortage; Peer review; Open peer review; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Plant biology","score_opus":0.8200264845075884,"score_gpt":0.683649664139037,"score_spread":0.13637682036855137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796260596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03176828,0.002189599,0.002410965,0.1305668,0.0039177598,0.00038797563,0.000027395523,0.00009402738,0.8286372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95294654,0.0011828009,0.0047960505,0.021004451,0.0013722774,0.000017461412,0.0000049205773,0.000027476268,0.01864801],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741132,0.0011371621,0.00076053414,0.0010084269,0.02222389,0.000756778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90839416,0.033712942,0.001051256,0.0022481028,0.053173155,0.0014203789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.116350025,0.00018268845,0.00026245226,0.028242305,0.0006274834,0.053307567,0.0041960943,0.000072671,0.005030024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73984915,0.00012876281,0.00014456992,0.14422078,0.00016242206,0.04504892,0.00093762804,0.0012426061,0.013215342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013929514,0.0001702787,0.0047930954,0.0000025713562,0.000020812358,0.000035132925,0.0001198462,0.0000013268336,0.0004978092,0.0021025776,0.52673537,0.4653819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075081864,0.00013465558,0.0019611947,0.000008907372,0.000017116117,0.000034038243,0.0002483692,0.00091663597,0.00224544,0.001286675,0.9922249,0.00017127932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023661777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005547483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9211783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001650132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000324154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99587953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796774656","doi":"10.1080/0194262x.2018.1445063","title":"Information Seeking Behaviors, Attitudes, and Choices of Academic Chemists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Technology Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Brock University","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","keywords":"Credibility; Information seeking; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Work (physics); Graduate students; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.19762230372971246,"score_gpt":0.49826799255530685,"score_spread":0.3006456888255944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796774656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910147,0.0007451694,0.0010356228,0.0016396338,0.00026419884,0.0001331125,0.0000109701205,0.00009482106,0.0050617266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684495,0.00012890874,0.0027138016,0.00007448632,0.000029393048,0.0000065449126,8.9955296e-7,0.000003010319,0.00019800119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470305,0.000020960972,0.0005886116,0.000412652,0.0037492446,0.00052545196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665934,0.000466307,0.00035886787,0.0006271092,0.0017164788,0.0001718977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076206075,0.000112741545,0.00022216726,0.053393636,0.00059738907,0.0013477749,0.0036073618,0.00023743595,0.00009008338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020275468,0.00008163752,0.000028238543,0.17686251,0.01001133,0.0066625243,0.0020626425,0.00032513952,0.00006476441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007789995,0.000020765341,0.73042524,0.0000078430785,0.0000025340805,5.761887e-7,0.00039050434,3.6813944e-7,0.06319339,0.051474344,0.00060583913,0.15387084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003038888,0.00031480726,0.44870314,0.00003536594,0.0000051575926,0.000025152529,0.0013044559,0.0007664725,0.4333438,0.083850995,0.0310896,0.00025715755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016089483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002646336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37015042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032787215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045887713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800148785","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2187","title":"Dissertation-to-Book Publication Patterns Among a Sample of R1 Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oklahoma; University of Kansas; University of Minnesota; University of Notre Dame; University of Washington; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Subject (documents); Library science; Openness to experience; The arts; Sample (material); Subject matter; Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Curriculum","score_opus":0.5213068775118257,"score_gpt":0.5402604555768521,"score_spread":0.0189535780650264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800148785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94813246,0.0007482484,0.042746924,0.00557556,0.00014554974,0.00015209224,0.000026305228,0.000006926991,0.0024659177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900569,0.00031494262,0.009006768,0.00026554806,0.000068416964,0.000003995272,0.00000956074,0.0000062377117,0.00026765134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955279,0.00050422165,0.0010919995,0.00018997537,0.002507932,0.00017795709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876937,0.0032588951,0.00091835635,0.00089834054,0.006850047,0.0003806056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012394675,0.0000874197,0.00023469541,0.015945861,0.00040623243,0.0050225444,0.0024950432,0.00009875516,0.00025247983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04615643,0.00006450796,0.000089763416,0.02799231,0.00022559981,0.01232399,0.00037312222,0.00039791802,0.000022020062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039617396,0.000118532065,0.94260556,0.0000037093628,0.000020309946,4.2767007e-7,0.0021596104,0.000004785144,0.0010649721,0.014666887,0.0032420703,0.036073517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030372015,0.00025777394,0.9718322,0.00004302636,0.000009221564,0.000006031712,0.00084300945,0.00025129336,0.0010380723,0.008994887,0.016346116,0.000074636075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013420617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006940882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041924406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041842508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000347089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800174757","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.170901","title":"Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; McGill University Health Centre; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidence interval; Productivity; Medicine; Peer review; Principal (computer security); Psychology; Family medicine; Demography; Computer science; Political science; Internal medicine; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6250098631629204,"score_gpt":0.6052866715713491,"score_spread":0.01972319159157132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800174757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74619853,0.0038780333,0.00015706441,0.22559519,0.002603198,0.00041809352,0.000093698785,0.000002290331,0.02105387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397177,0.0027724996,0.000089822104,0.001996107,0.0003539415,0.0000037621319,0.0000026317173,0.0000051942893,0.0008042497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94679284,0.001954158,0.0014545252,0.00031835109,0.048453398,0.0010267005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706291,0.0039651697,0.00042903004,0.00030836806,0.022374325,0.0022940065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20619147,0.000081373706,0.0003859873,0.02958325,0.00019237636,0.00044233413,0.0017721088,0.00017503169,0.0072204103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26855302,0.000060047565,0.00007780197,0.100076385,0.00010743502,0.00022872738,0.00013295792,0.0016969168,0.00006452823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013015281,0.000021584063,0.5861037,0.0000074819986,0.0000056220583,0.00040346084,0.000030613053,0.000002937465,0.000003872604,0.00009527061,0.36229783,0.051026374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040943414,0.000052864005,0.84822875,0.00028661903,0.0000012356084,0.000038021273,0.00037996168,0.0027061366,0.0000044866783,0.0008506155,0.14697196,0.000069930364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9268892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99679726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26212507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006719455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05090253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800643910","doi":"10.24069/2542-0267-2017-2-4-89-106","title":"Article processing charges for open access publication — the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor and Publisher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Publication; Payment; Publishing; Library science; Business; Scholarly communication; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Advertising; Finance","score_opus":0.6636388431243844,"score_gpt":0.6271668038582291,"score_spread":0.036472039266155276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800643910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092038,0.00012175676,0.0010650109,0.07953496,0.0048212917,0.0015365306,0.000028059605,0.000004242936,0.0036843268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962367,0.0000070127085,0.00013328445,0.00074802927,0.0016287748,0.00007825693,0.000001933185,0.0000025686086,0.0011634643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949156,0.00013608905,0.00020641054,0.00050506834,0.003747353,0.0004894956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724082,0.006051564,0.00012400362,0.00041199705,0.020821769,0.00018252034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049737453,0.000058342335,0.000088570465,0.0055964994,0.0019176262,0.037494764,0.004793556,0.000036025194,0.000038394945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051417157,0.000028682622,0.0000117081545,0.048167694,0.0013531108,0.009152194,0.001192553,0.00013701117,0.0000015693397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002630816,0.000015585363,0.03963443,0.000004218674,0.0000010831401,1.2265977e-7,0.0018271146,5.033661e-7,0.00012849853,0.0026751077,0.921188,0.03449904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005811738,0.00023321738,0.43347305,0.000011629935,0.0000032362032,0.0000026035004,0.06021502,0.017891122,0.0006541435,0.027134582,0.45964488,0.00015534055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07894541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18087284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4615431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013993747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002442233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801626634","doi":"10.29007/sxfq","title":"Women in the Shadow of Big Men: The Case of Canada Excellence Research Chairs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"EasyChair preprint","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Government (linguistics); Citation; Political science; Shadow (psychology); Library science; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Citation impact; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.5901366365887122,"score_gpt":0.5595273375253721,"score_spread":0.03060929906334009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801626634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25561187,0.0036435432,0.0016423851,0.0063299243,0.0034943025,0.0030063451,0.00046016122,0.0000075256985,0.7258039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399543,0.00053763133,0.000029132483,0.00006267909,0.00023359332,0.00018782442,0.0000026489124,0.000017691487,0.058974497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755986,0.0034265248,0.0018465059,0.0015275199,0.015864896,0.0017359587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752269,0.013859835,0.00080138433,0.0041637938,0.0055544423,0.00039365128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13519987,0.00029720372,0.0007664537,0.025148017,0.00044580735,0.0006273312,0.010503083,0.00027883222,0.004577124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031273868,0.00014770911,0.00019172307,0.12341243,0.0013230707,0.00010649211,0.003404708,0.0014953468,0.00065844296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226066,0.00040423122,0.0016155579,0.00012288676,0.000062285806,0.00046216827,0.0113003235,0.0028754235,0.000104695035,0.0009193689,0.92844945,0.05356098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018287539,0.0017263639,0.033359233,0.0005317971,0.0000068073005,0.0007566627,0.1658802,0.01618738,0.0033344708,0.041316688,0.73367274,0.0013988917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5456885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27580917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68434244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068798586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005203146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801852815","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scy033","title":"Introduction to a special section: Balancing scientific and societal impact—A challenging agenda for academic research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Realisation; Section (typography); Corporate governance; Special section; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Business; Engineering; Economics; Management; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6259160529110942,"score_gpt":0.6343178958835899,"score_spread":0.008401842972495688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801852815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421332,0.00021683922,0.0013182831,0.048940413,0.0032883459,0.00048787164,0.00002998205,0.000026835547,0.003558239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706223,0.00006660543,0.00039023632,0.00025138303,0.026530748,0.000023401557,0.0000014331945,0.000008371352,0.0021055313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880094,0.0001497832,0.0004138863,0.001496369,0.008228815,0.0017017685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872504,0.0012976102,0.00010985108,0.000631025,0.009471569,0.0012395746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08882024,0.00014075887,0.00021125213,0.06665157,0.004853022,0.010412942,0.0017455067,0.000120477955,0.00017659574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10376112,0.000101939506,0.00006341234,0.22330347,0.0038957633,0.002604119,0.0013698151,0.0004256282,0.00011563316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032886925,0.000044628578,0.007831957,0.000009198119,0.0000075604225,9.794661e-7,0.0033136948,0.0000032937046,0.026931686,0.015880583,0.5236715,0.42227203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045204046,0.0008210973,0.079143256,0.000010204181,0.000002422629,0.00008056379,0.0031775373,0.0070983316,0.0018426903,0.020549316,0.8865146,0.00030792848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002190305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055906545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4219641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054552924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801910647","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2015.17463abstract","title":"An Examination of the Funding-Finding Relation in the Field of Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Bivariate analysis; Typology; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Funding Agency; Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.4957016888207452,"score_gpt":0.540564881162261,"score_spread":0.044863192341515756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801910647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93552274,0.00008918139,0.00045436667,0.0022752709,0.00008577775,0.0005909302,0.0000013596909,0.0000057078514,0.060974658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825543,0.00010656481,0.0007049338,0.00016481838,0.000018177678,0.000014997603,4.340575e-7,0.0000045846978,0.00073005096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272275,0.00009345876,0.0007631845,0.00033851582,0.0058346177,0.00024745797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979498,0.0007125961,0.0006318107,0.0002131225,0.00043136938,0.00006132367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030304626,0.00009177483,0.00018284947,0.013931942,0.000069677684,0.00018242851,0.0028147986,0.00008994059,0.000022905095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029254705,0.0000523666,0.00006938715,0.05476379,0.0001012203,0.000814851,0.0006047606,0.00020778493,0.000004806136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006360163,0.00037892134,0.28996763,0.0002342209,0.000051086197,0.0000010869937,0.004108222,0.00017524377,0.00064372487,0.29941154,0.019228276,0.38573647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004601692,0.00014907551,0.9625613,0.000059977017,0.000019701185,5.189189e-7,0.008018452,0.002027071,0.0029641027,0.018573873,0.0050924416,0.000073302326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001328987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.621911e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6725937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005713211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008419814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801923759","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2016.13895symposium","title":"The Organization of Science: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Productivity; Knowledge production; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Cross disciplinary; Work (physics); Production (economics); Media studies; Public relations; Management; Political science; Library science; Social science; Engineering; Computer science; Knowledge management; Data science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.40911810048985814,"score_gpt":0.5209899935145234,"score_spread":0.11187189302466521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801923759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524587,0.00025414466,0.011114252,0.0062372517,0.00016453733,0.0007635903,0.0000064118476,0.000036214857,0.028964942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897613,0.0005361952,0.004098721,0.000033313918,0.000023040606,0.000009819041,1.2874402e-7,0.000008174287,0.0055293213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907728,0.000017666523,0.0007065116,0.0005852277,0.0074672964,0.00045050963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625057,0.0006418808,0.00053376815,0.00020106454,0.0022210844,0.00015163062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024071485,0.00010515215,0.0001897438,0.017870497,0.0005013082,0.00045612254,0.0044749365,0.000069255046,0.000043890766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010244691,0.000046985777,0.00005899806,0.14181401,0.0017318812,0.0011479454,0.0023118297,0.000106743835,0.00003837544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004010859,0.00041149455,0.18455991,0.00010209526,0.000060621605,4.2158644e-7,0.0007104323,0.0000069751877,0.04679946,0.24952762,0.029852185,0.48792866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013050993,0.00013430846,0.8872148,0.00006573569,0.00002532654,0.000003967331,0.0048838295,0.0031082542,0.061500426,0.02158774,0.019904833,0.0002656722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013990839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.413904e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006844636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004425652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803613079","doi":"10.7202/1045308ar","title":"Les réseaux de coauteurs : 40 ans de collaborations à la revue Criminologie","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.9237201480428799,"score_gpt":0.6351712705646263,"score_spread":0.28854887747825364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803613079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8242419,0.014073809,0.041887093,0.05151136,0.0050032893,0.00057048217,0.00021442397,0.00028801456,0.062209643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94433874,0.0067270338,0.021885496,0.00086575875,0.00089391624,0.000056582277,0.000012386388,0.00004296485,0.0251771],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906636,0.0014146507,0.0010209202,0.0014526634,0.0028112791,0.002636916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041034,0.010569198,0.00036419003,0.0017754191,0.0058981627,0.0009826998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013314486,0.0004505333,0.0006268125,0.024809083,0.0012687688,0.0034532999,0.004832056,0.0011901155,0.0036909073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112849034,0.00040384298,0.0002809782,0.08067813,0.004232966,0.0008424906,0.0016680525,0.00107641,0.004124124],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006764774,0.0004875446,0.048159815,0.00006188956,0.00005003119,0.00034671408,0.0015416732,0.00008978876,0.0025616735,0.029722678,0.1337442,0.78316635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008038591,0.0014669873,0.3208789,0.000102374244,0.00014242475,0.00024183246,0.011563297,0.009727761,0.012954894,0.069382355,0.5719518,0.000783494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018530611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041966297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78238285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011826314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037349442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804029226","doi":"","title":"Open Access for Journal Publications: The How-To Guide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; Open access journal; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.47360780207855646,"score_gpt":0.5397232857720806,"score_spread":0.06611548369352416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804029226","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003557032,0.00077654514,0.57085323,0.33669376,0.0007821291,0.0017663621,0.00026733315,0.0000549342,0.08524866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28082523,0.002477818,0.13005206,0.0023565597,0.00044485903,0.0017560482,0.00021240002,0.00015302519,0.581722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812063,0.008381262,0.0014760657,0.0018169245,0.0061543686,0.00096508674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88320184,0.0430817,0.0022613294,0.008571115,0.06163251,0.0012515245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1633714,0.00037156264,0.0005908904,0.016476417,0.0018283195,0.08245752,0.04771262,0.000317724,0.0008736834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26957095,0.00021983573,0.00047377357,0.04034855,0.00038075852,0.001983173,0.035092004,0.0009032887,0.00024920754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015080362,0.0002489316,0.0040987674,0.000014100686,0.00006061797,0.0000011354749,0.0009728881,0.000015814949,0.0003174957,0.06850602,0.620927,0.30482215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004979594,9.352703e-7,0.008356442,0.000305654,0.00001705184,0.000013197727,0.00014911704,0.0024978786,0.0041634017,0.12743433,0.8562232,0.00034079465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034397974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067026407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49647334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040969078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022856824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804129512","doi":"10.1177/0844562118777328","title":"Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Publishing; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.9005290747628881,"score_gpt":0.7058359562956766,"score_spread":0.1946931184672115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804129512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330186,0.000583356,0.0004952242,0.13523103,0.0020126111,0.0005543754,0.00006613058,0.0000023986247,0.02803628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605876,0.00001687573,0.00036775932,0.00023080186,0.00041634456,0.000002788159,7.1277026e-7,0.000014947908,0.002891001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617643,0.0011678053,0.0007439108,0.00042808996,0.010229427,0.0012543278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650381,0.004076635,0.00040479592,0.0011492926,0.026140695,0.0031904592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09420071,0.00011400304,0.0003427144,0.059263907,0.0010264233,0.052859068,0.025058167,0.00011811729,0.00050624297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10429769,0.00006547175,0.00012215243,0.13331033,0.0017005515,0.0060839984,0.0012013206,0.0010796544,0.000070251204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007426355,0.000036679037,0.02096965,0.0000028135564,0.0000146328,0.000051164156,0.002641534,0.000012142705,0.00079525996,0.000555408,0.71948624,0.25536022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011227737,0.0023393123,0.3512808,0.0009290738,0.000013569083,0.0002105379,0.016979845,0.00043495515,0.012621855,0.06434714,0.5493449,0.00037521948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005833804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002541041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33031118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096220814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064383214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804203984","doi":"10.1002/asi.24028","title":"Co‐saved, co‐tweeted, and co‐cited networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Citation; Computer science; Social media; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Machine learning","score_opus":0.19676722602553115,"score_gpt":0.5112396376478187,"score_spread":0.3144724116222875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804203984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962294,0.00015981316,0.010309843,0.0141032105,0.001220654,0.00046992488,0.00003975421,0.000028273429,0.011374529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872684,0.00012495997,0.00033933588,0.00042320084,0.000073953546,0.0000025683062,7.586388e-7,0.0000019367692,0.00030642547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409467,0.00005034599,0.00079577684,0.00013980485,0.0045649996,0.0003544072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98417073,0.0012557354,0.0016630946,0.00024177443,0.012534329,0.00013430374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03408625,0.000074811665,0.00020437688,0.025177019,0.0009253584,0.0017545598,0.001495512,0.00018034426,0.000015668309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06442229,0.000043196607,0.000054157794,0.065256074,0.00083238777,0.0031848825,0.00017749378,0.00025585183,0.000029838462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006642761,0.0000438294,0.55449426,0.000005447136,0.000042033607,4.1321866e-7,0.0006678327,0.00003160532,0.001990887,0.017801387,0.08468142,0.34017447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021833254,0.0009572962,0.23402531,0.000020574556,0.000021737684,0.00011073426,0.0024275423,0.030305708,0.01391759,0.02323912,0.6925508,0.00024024793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000027331048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020421483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6078694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024591287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031346595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992817},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2807638568","doi":"10.1109/bigcomp.2018.00065","title":"Article Impact Value for Nearby Citation Network Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Computer science; Metadata; Value (mathematics); Similarity (geometry); Citation impact; Data science; Measure (data warehouse); Information retrieval; Citation analysis; Data mining; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6134994399169142,"score_gpt":0.6385578056579951,"score_spread":0.02505836574108089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807638568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62909865,0.000075857126,0.3553285,0.0005141652,0.0002508757,0.0002120463,0.000014686233,0.000026314703,0.014478905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808481,0.0000053942963,0.015468421,0.00022398605,0.00032752176,0.000009571951,0.0000042798642,0.000005445104,0.0031073112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944021,0.00012505894,0.00045490614,0.000492932,0.0039321966,0.00059279654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99070346,0.0045820973,0.00013210742,0.0005835131,0.0036602335,0.0003385882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019606391,0.00008786814,0.00023338803,0.03320032,0.0003416445,0.0021836604,0.0009463899,0.000064905376,0.0023592892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020527562,0.00005238668,0.00036024893,0.3756772,0.0001237161,0.00044014092,0.000172451,0.000060892136,0.0007180465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009410932,0.00011484323,0.6269308,0.0000010562676,0.00030448858,0.000001071871,0.00015848559,0.006998422,0.0007990551,0.013912087,0.18352419,0.16716142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024535475,0.00033074297,0.47690114,5.366019e-7,0.000041488227,4.1300277e-7,0.00008202003,0.47613522,0.00064118236,0.03315788,0.012363451,0.00010056659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001595796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080089456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4691368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067482266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009482328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988522},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2807688391","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000002735","title":"Highly Cited Works in Spinal Disorders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Calgary; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Back pain; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Scientific literature; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Lumbar spine; Guideline; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Lumbar; Library science; Surgery; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6544068845532449,"score_gpt":0.6320850456572747,"score_spread":0.02232183889597017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807688391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051153613,0.99120694,0.00047003795,0.0001910385,0.0012294312,0.00059066765,0.000022529106,0.000026386484,0.006211804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011345868,0.99535084,0.0004894765,0.000038057715,0.00033536248,0.00004489638,0.000025415313,0.000032124015,0.003570373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883592,0.0003982189,0.0016197299,0.0013561198,0.0073289243,0.00093781686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559796,0.0010327314,0.0005766205,0.0014258166,0.0009484143,0.0004184683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01741975,0.00040314623,0.001700264,0.14729626,0.00012279378,0.0022617462,0.00458157,0.00049739826,0.0010354313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024743551,0.00025119013,0.00060915685,0.41580725,0.00027539118,0.00037109424,0.0011723399,0.00083082455,0.0031902385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034450793,0.00006983693,0.00011158967,0.00026131188,0.000011768922,0.000014033793,0.0000040393506,2.2213943e-7,4.588282e-8,0.00012760701,0.009953348,0.98944277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020525401,0.0002211825,0.0012343293,0.0023693242,0.00001764077,0.00000491328,0.000010116971,0.000059590253,1.0821092e-7,0.0014175457,0.9941558,0.00030417048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008258944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011988711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023806668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050596916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808055521","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.01","title":"Losing Our Modesty: The Content and Communication of Peer Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Credibility; Object (grammar); Scholarly communication; Metadata; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Media studies; World Wide Web; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7996148986644458,"score_gpt":0.5840325802009457,"score_spread":0.21558231846350007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808055521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54798037,0.09651129,0.0043461667,0.3427437,0.0007012334,0.00025747725,0.000011586357,0.000005938483,0.007442219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876488,0.005996948,0.0037413852,0.001444718,0.0001713764,6.4163044e-7,5.000333e-7,0.0000059256445,0.0009897208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98438895,0.0006878579,0.0012742705,0.00018443097,0.013226969,0.00023754791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91291696,0.0031661543,0.0021529582,0.0009733845,0.08042887,0.00036169926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15839083,0.00007896511,0.00032904654,0.011061256,0.00034886593,0.049327437,0.003975178,0.000085514424,0.000039120765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35102448,0.000040010127,0.00013176473,0.03801529,0.00016127535,0.04132789,0.00089365017,0.0011636817,0.00000782197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042576172,0.0001193346,0.12736964,0.00004958915,0.000065982065,0.0000058797673,0.000945027,0.000004221373,0.0026768316,0.0033211105,0.4590863,0.4063135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019070043,0.00097466697,0.47068813,0.0028120982,0.00012189042,0.00054532196,0.012349434,0.002376065,0.0016503173,0.044812858,0.46138662,0.00037558985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000738273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009064766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43966842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000694295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002245183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808267801","doi":"","title":"Are Publication and Citation Counts Reliable Indicators of Research Productivity or Impact","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Citation; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Accounting; Political science; Business; Library science; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7945339118265194,"score_gpt":0.6796818802460064,"score_spread":0.11485203158051305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808267801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376677,0.00008322815,0.00012652234,0.0018555862,0.0001215664,0.00019664053,0.000015284812,0.000007764926,0.05992567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827851,0.000055759236,0.00024415748,0.0000075936987,0.000030615818,0.0000049724,9.869312e-7,0.0000029418266,0.016867878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943126,0.0000986524,0.00022341919,0.00034393175,0.0047983048,0.00022310925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929153,0.0012619083,0.00037604838,0.00089259417,0.0043927347,0.00016143543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029197691,0.00004274659,0.000117785,0.03152056,0.0003939108,0.0021048968,0.0010362576,0.00005626171,0.0010869692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15661485,0.000023351342,0.0000244968,0.05268539,0.00031097754,0.00088528416,0.0003699343,0.00013347981,0.00018765539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002077849,0.00005990843,0.7925846,0.000005907247,0.0000043334994,7.7709683e-7,0.000030889165,3.9813312e-7,0.00015541376,0.0009916162,0.12317122,0.08297417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009642637,0.000062906794,0.97874314,0.000003913086,6.082012e-7,8.587273e-7,0.000095193354,0.00033046582,0.0010176542,0.004570697,0.015043307,0.00003483968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017445406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020260786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18615854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048964048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019128692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808590901","doi":"","title":"Canadian National reports 1Q decline in profit, revenue, but cites 'momentum'","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transport topics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Revenue; Profit (economics); Momentum (technical analysis); Business; Economics; International trade; Commerce; Finance; Microeconomics; Fishery","score_opus":0.42173709773100965,"score_gpt":0.5310813724993377,"score_spread":0.10934427476832809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808590901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96570724,0.00018277719,0.0002923166,0.0074364515,0.00083346694,0.0002733957,0.00012138327,0.00001474164,0.025138238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97733134,0.00004370023,0.000902055,0.00062239356,0.0003521967,0.000012611112,0.000024632129,0.000008517835,0.020702535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312943,0.000050215407,0.0007921245,0.00056857703,0.0049015163,0.0005581343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966499,0.00027961316,0.00013446077,0.00045976913,0.0020172352,0.00045901028],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009807219,0.000116252406,0.00022239819,0.021604603,0.00016015193,0.0002828653,0.0008682258,0.0001246923,0.0013106342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045986576,0.000094326875,0.000081779166,0.05283816,0.00012818727,0.00029507553,0.00005802684,0.00020539189,0.00017507798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061051765,0.00003196976,0.97741836,0.0000031306342,0.0000042416596,0.00020448685,0.00011861164,0.0000060844914,0.00008069456,0.0007010423,0.009993507,0.011431757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015844416,0.000051804785,0.6640439,0.0000071203244,0.000001610202,0.0000148514655,0.00004106143,0.00017772215,0.00035425788,0.012704033,0.32233378,0.00011138149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03774943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24704875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31337443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028111166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011270323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808971281","doi":"","title":"Åpen tilgang til vitenskapelig publisering","year":2016,"lang":"no","type":"article","venue":"FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Publishing; Publication; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6450189691488819,"score_gpt":0.5384833821347461,"score_spread":0.10653558701413579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808971281","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012698543,0.0056470805,0.9608611,0.0048377737,0.00421678,0.005613073,0.0009488466,0.00053233997,0.004644497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7406718,0.0050791693,0.1296245,0.0015834334,0.0029759947,0.001557035,0.00011072418,0.00084495265,0.11755239],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96896327,0.0012322183,0.004752357,0.004364017,0.013878249,0.0068099094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531847,0.029935395,0.002630405,0.003498906,0.007094759,0.0036558246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059003808,0.0020102616,0.002529249,0.04913174,0.0026276417,0.00831475,0.010688545,0.0020074954,0.0025782431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07088182,0.0013624093,0.0018752926,0.0835311,0.002083395,0.00802293,0.0023636434,0.001398188,0.0051569324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024920218,0.0005932732,0.009713508,0.00024426248,0.00045328797,0.000107917185,0.0009915176,0.0002530622,0.040694084,0.010091347,0.32674047,0.60762525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011494443,0.00572596,0.0023747357,0.0012223491,0.0004711158,0.00025644954,0.0007469589,0.049322203,0.05647477,0.0426652,0.8246558,0.0045900336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008096485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000544665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83123654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012653655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021988952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809373312","doi":"10.1002/gch2.201800004","title":"A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Global Challenges","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research; York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Norges Forskningsråd; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Typology; Advisory committee; Political science; Engineering ethics; Library science; Engineering; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8541696912354003,"score_gpt":0.6475795331653768,"score_spread":0.20659015807002357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809373312","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000392982,0.9456234,0.000018791223,0.00017989258,0.002342678,0.00037838618,0.00040539278,0.00002885155,0.050983336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00037237306,0.9978484,0.00024588592,0.00001028096,0.0002343782,0.0000216513,0.000016646538,0.000016648402,0.0012337455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870044,0.0009875288,0.0016143563,0.0015978526,0.007926379,0.0008695023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858076,0.0040170657,0.00108142,0.0022863345,0.003611019,0.00042338762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022318592,0.0004177424,0.0023100644,0.033509873,0.0002497994,0.0009974415,0.006829728,0.00064056535,0.0006289061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020929042,0.00026507676,0.00089840917,0.12045103,0.0016659296,0.00022544804,0.0022615655,0.00036681653,0.0027892287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029332225,0.00010546093,0.000035225894,0.0010046931,0.00005344766,0.000008186532,0.00002551065,3.17668e-8,3.3254818e-8,0.006674518,0.032539375,0.95955056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090573354,0.0001997254,0.00015111023,0.0006370149,0.000056793375,0.000029490517,0.00018673754,0.0000039168167,4.2441133e-7,0.0093470095,0.9890563,0.00024088589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000227597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008006786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020402299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092314434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809533743","doi":"10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.18","title":"The Public Knowledge Project: Reflections and Directions After Its First Two Decades","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Principal (computer security); Scholarship; Software; Publishing; Political science; Code (set theory); Sample (material); Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Library science; Computer security; Set (abstract data type); Law","score_opus":0.7158824423329107,"score_gpt":0.6390853384108165,"score_spread":0.07679710392209416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809533743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1248991,0.067420624,0.0064329635,0.02680848,0.01516361,0.003526579,0.00025101806,0.0004776637,0.75501996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001595,0.008435086,0.0014737865,0.00008485653,0.0007739642,0.00066973787,0.000005037058,0.00003226185,0.088365816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162793,0.0004627942,0.000862913,0.0015229785,0.004639402,0.00088395405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98140216,0.008433895,0.00028367166,0.001629331,0.0077607525,0.00049019774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019509282,0.00031596769,0.0003761461,0.058221396,0.0024073094,0.017788371,0.0030995337,0.0003299884,0.0007922633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045915462,0.0001667888,0.00024961247,0.14995116,0.0006825333,0.00052435376,0.005333176,0.00095110864,0.0010609919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006800783,0.00067801465,0.0700042,0.000047688438,0.00023933644,0.000013113696,0.0014354803,0.0000042292477,0.000046890687,0.008656922,0.5658999,0.35290623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015478645,0.00007209739,0.020561859,0.000016828173,0.000012172433,0.000018568902,0.00029739804,0.0022552933,0.00010831667,0.010435479,0.96580386,0.00026331173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002377044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011722735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7752603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021978955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000936639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809665810","doi":"10.5958/2249-5576.2018.00002.x","title":"A bibliometric study of world research output on e-resources during 2006–2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Regional science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.2437621560870567,"score_gpt":0.559097465874093,"score_spread":0.31533530978703633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809665810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915505,0.000115602976,0.0005038149,0.0020259642,0.0005192403,0.00016011843,0.000012971982,0.000012415651,0.0050993734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984336,0.000115645,0.00019560468,0.000024031131,0.00010632527,0.0000046219925,0.0000011481319,0.00000393828,0.0011150977],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902186,0.0001352718,0.0013555865,0.00016898867,0.007883656,0.0002379446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97467995,0.0018062557,0.0010657226,0.00026298666,0.022061313,0.00012378822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011665082,0.0000963633,0.00023497303,0.6548519,0.00017955835,0.0008487294,0.0019312167,0.00010034068,0.00020356354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033823438,0.00006705721,0.00005473034,0.38234678,0.0003276257,0.0014757976,0.00046835528,0.00038352935,0.00009039797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032182765,0.0007696478,0.1446039,0.0000070771525,0.00009949298,0.000015092227,0.0023583965,0.000015983356,0.0010322457,0.0047740582,0.014565989,0.8314363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003013214,0.003779973,0.88912094,0.00016942745,0.000010566947,0.00013638886,0.019591693,0.00095798925,0.016421843,0.0100650685,0.056511827,0.00022105676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001459649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011535159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83121526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118818076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008161476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809867448","doi":"10.1044/2018_aja-17-0107","title":"Audiology Faculty Author Impact Metrics as a Function of Institution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Audiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Accreditation; Institution; Rank (graph theory); Psychology; Bibliometrics; Medical education; Statistics; Medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.47138702542643024,"score_gpt":0.6087065498491919,"score_spread":0.13731952442276169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809867448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95036095,0.00028130403,0.045291446,0.00081871013,0.0013132644,0.00008259489,0.000023490404,0.0000071266522,0.0018210988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968164,0.00013851273,0.0022227312,0.00019499929,0.00039076942,0.0000011690304,0.0000022869333,0.00000783887,0.00022532341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937615,0.0008121384,0.0014522306,0.00039554352,0.003017172,0.00056142133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850719,0.0030283856,0.002655671,0.00047248512,0.008322571,0.00044901873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016795458,0.00017278241,0.00094590953,0.04148746,0.00016309028,0.00013172803,0.001601522,0.00014548076,0.00070530147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057451002,0.000103951585,0.00041492964,0.10113642,0.002220146,0.0004422177,0.0002926065,0.000432234,0.00026506974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009806193,0.00017152558,0.3680437,0.0000020563748,0.00022345067,0.00003358567,0.00025660646,0.00016637122,0.008935719,0.0013101257,0.021396646,0.5984796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007408859,0.021424938,0.9459324,0.000008014259,0.000041906158,0.0006162681,0.00081821263,0.00032992073,0.001099947,0.008740872,0.020081088,0.00016553885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016759383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009599039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59831405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020709289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008484425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96937644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809971035","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.42159","title":"Evaluating Academic Research Networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Position (finance); Institutional research; Curriculum; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Higher education; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9653113425368469,"score_gpt":0.7773576803100251,"score_spread":0.18795366222682186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809971035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97652644,0.004512383,0.0045996257,0.0024145967,0.0026870403,0.0014641546,0.0000042665783,0.0000100788875,0.0077813854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407065,0.000037806425,0.0040219645,0.00007447038,0.0014020113,0.000029429775,0.0000020991167,0.000012167865,0.00034939006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97701114,0.002449771,0.0012602234,0.00041179423,0.01781584,0.0010512369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448,0.0029591348,0.0005899289,0.0005033102,0.049523648,0.0016239565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29379565,0.00010802416,0.00024356083,0.054222804,0.000815444,0.0023955686,0.0024940083,0.00021799734,0.0022775638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1838205,0.00007924805,0.0001336375,0.11574809,0.00064622494,0.0008133421,0.000110195964,0.0011714823,0.0003271445],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012741972,0.000014997523,0.02301316,8.175188e-7,0.000010017812,0.000006735338,0.0002449949,0.0005092912,0.00008613408,0.00023154373,0.020177541,0.95569205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010483181,0.0036163873,0.13800114,0.000067668814,0.000033672855,0.00009098042,0.0010699206,0.71032447,0.00025434117,0.046627134,0.098645724,0.00022023123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081879756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035841395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000794105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00760428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810937555","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-05581-4","title":"A better measure of research from the global south","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.6442479540031415,"score_gpt":0.6357522591561631,"score_spread":0.00849569484697843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810937555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505942,0.0032989704,0.00034170703,0.013407462,0.0009732487,0.00022575095,0.00031881823,0.000015536265,0.03082429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971794,0.000009603603,0.0005654443,0.0009913729,0.0006879411,0.0000027729577,0.0000021211895,0.0000047665512,0.0005565691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807602,0.0005759646,0.00034342587,0.00056183786,0.017241089,0.0005174604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98330766,0.005262807,0.00012028759,0.001267163,0.009838246,0.00020384157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029606314,0.000089673624,0.00018531094,0.0077577396,0.0003431358,0.0010059002,0.0043023094,0.0007951426,0.0011293916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070908256,0.000042385902,0.00012161093,0.19416142,0.0007726045,0.00018044855,0.0009675051,0.0022568242,0.00084482244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006223967,0.000050421346,0.5382526,0.0000011039199,0.000022037992,0.000005882916,0.00049145316,2.7202697e-7,0.00041360728,0.002227789,0.38539448,0.073078126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034851447,0.00015028164,0.7118287,0.00001600735,0.0000040026775,0.0000018890751,0.0008488712,0.00023880872,0.0020327694,0.07735936,0.2070736,0.000097201475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018350699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011676533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18640368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007623736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023733274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811055236","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.15256.2","title":"What is a predatory journal? A scoping review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Grey literature; Web of science; CINAHL; Medicine; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9152973410968032,"score_gpt":0.7496890964298902,"score_spread":0.16560824466691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811055236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.255653e-7,0.9891187,0.000106277745,0.0008828244,0.0026197047,0.003716286,0.00009015624,0.000039791656,0.0034257455],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.2989005e-8,0.96390384,0.00022966017,0.0005779005,0.0011173005,0.00022318854,0.000016028762,0.00010245543,0.033829555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94984335,0.0044482057,0.003775579,0.00223753,0.0374523,0.002243045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553101,0.018983481,0.001865007,0.0047946726,0.016520204,0.002526517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15264933,0.0006879686,0.003806303,0.1078312,0.0009572492,0.026632125,0.016449604,0.000695651,0.02420215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10513544,0.00041257645,0.002047736,0.27617756,0.00077416096,0.0031723238,0.005682404,0.0030145394,0.028096732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000159701,0.000040207102,0.000004013262,0.026080213,0.00004341976,0.000061667655,0.000020137191,6.281368e-9,2.5901524e-8,0.000008139489,0.37155786,0.60218275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008043241,0.00013712017,0.0000012251758,0.31544873,0.000054660017,0.00019659036,0.00003515115,0.000009269235,6.34924e-7,0.00047007186,0.68326277,0.00030332606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009779443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005209153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008336073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2811150674","doi":"10.1111/jan.13771","title":"So, you want to start a new nursing journal? Stop, read this first","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Privilege (computing); Nothing; Mainstream; Optimism; Quality (philosophy); Amateur; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2848995196669989,"score_gpt":0.5592680815274333,"score_spread":0.27436856186043446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811150674","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022103877,0.008712204,0.025591306,0.009294814,0.9501356,0.00035025363,0.00006796311,0.00002192889,0.0036155707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007866104,0.0037330661,0.049561907,0.00014099888,0.92798364,0.0000016580854,0.000006621811,0.00013569593,0.017649788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636359,0.00045658767,0.003524789,0.001078181,0.02961861,0.0016859215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95783806,0.0096634235,0.0049941577,0.0014237848,0.022800338,0.003280258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028894028,0.00065921596,0.0018387253,0.08229155,0.0014153435,0.008809056,0.0061251097,0.00086827856,0.0012580592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14475748,0.00046747053,0.00096084015,0.08178096,0.0005052664,0.0024390582,0.00030594663,0.003958573,0.00032396783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004541387,0.00016366776,0.000012086716,0.0000059954027,0.000034891575,0.00012155932,0.0015659943,0.00019207041,0.0001805214,0.0000055357305,0.6090474,0.38821614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014938385,0.0025392012,0.00009898706,0.0038095452,0.00008576815,0.00032099927,0.0021811621,0.00009545203,0.0002786071,0.012909874,0.97564816,0.0005384057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021596075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001100125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38767773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038251192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005728089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2833021694","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021233","title":"What can we learn from top-cited articles in inflammatory bowel disease? A bibliometric analysis and assessment of the level of evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Medicine; Inflammatory bowel disease; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Disease; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.7925630835302033,"score_gpt":0.6323913316403316,"score_spread":0.16017175188987176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2833021694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99437857,0.0008637514,0.00045322653,0.002608594,0.00016061947,0.0012710541,0.000083718805,0.0000027297824,0.00017772584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755174,0.00071720936,0.00095736835,0.000077938115,0.000024127294,0.000053324748,0.0000012905405,0.0000054589973,0.0006115457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912278,0.0006639194,0.0009709224,0.00059369305,0.0062209712,0.00032270275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99047536,0.005225726,0.0006020622,0.001366975,0.0020316774,0.00029821217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02080272,0.00011952356,0.00043179453,0.35585207,0.000118518896,0.0030036059,0.003555335,0.000061801984,0.00047597114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030779118,0.000064919965,0.00014453886,0.7991777,0.00043430514,0.0015849074,0.003360929,0.00015331652,0.000010219601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056895264,0.00007618906,0.925513,0.000008905103,0.000053185984,0.0000033359117,0.00027948292,0.0000397801,0.0005973606,0.00006234956,0.0003638689,0.072945595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032084223,0.00007133132,0.9776048,0.00014509668,0.000040053423,2.3279576e-7,0.00085153093,0.017003287,0.0011838366,0.0024825428,0.00019786289,0.00009858502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036491803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026643162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4433256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007096902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067423674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2838196109","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.019","title":"Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Leverhulme Trust; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.8305750337389989,"score_gpt":0.6893394636568446,"score_spread":0.14123557008215426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2838196109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90211654,0.0016433145,0.000099278106,0.089244656,0.000071474715,0.00110946,0.00005637101,0.000019022775,0.00563986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865358,0.006700746,0.0005024439,0.00039924867,0.00042422613,0.00020913442,0.0000032084422,0.000014967321,0.0052102366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950758,0.0003378774,0.000437292,0.0014188495,0.0019610377,0.00076913997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795146,0.008328773,0.00022365635,0.002475264,0.008933631,0.0005241039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042229466,0.00011642911,0.00028279066,0.032759253,0.000532612,0.0015919259,0.0010749556,0.00010997176,0.000015600408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24671182,0.00008876084,0.000033712484,0.062103167,0.000843554,0.0005023602,0.00093513913,0.00022663135,0.000029930672],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012735081,0.00013004692,0.17022797,0.00007452616,0.000051187006,0.000002053995,0.001961287,0.0000022879128,0.003128586,0.054413088,0.13722311,0.6326585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008594788,0.00041016118,0.40104574,0.000032144228,0.000002211548,0.000011051817,0.0035159255,0.0045465715,0.0020670916,0.111458555,0.4758367,0.0002143661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002963997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005559073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63244414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030474522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031895496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2860074735","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0197775","title":"Words by the tail: Assessing lexical diversity in scholarly titles using frequency-rank distribution tail fits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Zipf's law; Word lists by frequency; Discipline; Scientometrics; Microdata (statistics); Rank (graph theory); Diversity (politics); Computer science; Statistics; Social science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Sociology; Library science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.686871493058404,"score_gpt":0.5087649493474646,"score_spread":0.17810654371093937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2860074735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904807,0.00043136763,0.0048216665,0.0010902806,0.00012317175,0.00015916431,0.000090610614,0.000019114656,0.002783885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979662,0.000040475872,0.0011549629,0.0000955817,0.00012199844,0.0000022733973,0.000011214213,0.0000060915218,0.00060121814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180675,0.00032152125,0.00037831286,0.0004998389,0.0064932522,0.00050031586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959375,0.0013810282,0.00014799465,0.00051300053,0.0018194782,0.00020099613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108195525,0.000112305104,0.0002223587,0.00555535,0.0010042604,0.0040394072,0.001729061,0.00013500739,0.0006192611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0230588,0.00007281365,0.000063444044,0.06483669,0.0003803896,0.0019664194,0.0012334179,0.0004496445,0.0003491214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021852718,0.0009976517,0.93163323,0.000007302168,0.000037344456,0.000012182569,0.00025857266,0.0000024103194,0.039565053,0.0005414305,0.008738434,0.018184548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013361148,0.00036852073,0.90617734,0.00020706,0.00006597401,0.0000059419813,0.0013043532,0.034843687,0.027702158,0.023553157,0.003770682,0.000665033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079599646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059281338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027632245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014999272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2864151529","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0198033","title":"Social reference managers and their users: A survey of demographics and ideologies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Altmetrics; Demographics; Social media; Work (physics); World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Data science; Key (lock); Internet privacy; Scale (ratio); Knowledge management; Sociology; Publishing; Geography; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.846625054880739,"score_gpt":0.5421992250965223,"score_spread":0.30442582978421673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2864151529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971155,0.00051020534,0.0001590672,0.00037637408,0.000019518502,0.000098397126,0.00005277775,0.000011983037,0.0016561988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830043,0.00071425206,0.0007357095,0.00004489136,0.0000201822,0.0000022589518,0.0000018659938,0.0000040464133,0.000176385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656695,0.00024481417,0.00029733632,0.00038664028,0.002240032,0.00026421555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325097,0.0038816305,0.0001475624,0.00028606362,0.0023142057,0.00011957935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109591875,0.00008391406,0.00028037405,0.013450094,0.00019213394,0.00047766525,0.0007203625,0.00009106136,0.000053272594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022792125,0.000054015723,0.0000231675,0.05523183,0.001017291,0.00023973879,0.0006530546,0.00012454837,0.000012199952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032461885,0.00015439604,0.9763018,0.000011774974,0.000049294977,7.069205e-7,0.00025147226,1.981653e-8,0.0016636839,0.0005547087,0.00089912023,0.020080546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015458747,0.00019953381,0.99053925,0.000008613596,0.0000055468836,3.4318919e-7,0.0003323288,0.00049170223,0.0018069135,0.0062928773,0.00009440313,0.00007392718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027356323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000332887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041781735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007921344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037861995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883394577","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.03","title":"Review Boards for Scientific Publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Criticism; Public relations; Peer review; Scientific writing; Political science; Scientific progress; Scientific communication; Path (computing); Pipeline (software); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6753861425574477,"score_gpt":0.571562453929783,"score_spread":0.10382368862766467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883394577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18146175,0.30107614,0.096054286,0.31788766,0.037785344,0.0019686283,0.00024385794,0.000112350914,0.06340997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707649,0.0066345823,0.07415827,0.023132447,0.011496401,0.000026646696,0.000021967233,0.00011205595,0.013652738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743257,0.0005266476,0.0025696454,0.00079728285,0.02079539,0.000985337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77746636,0.011396972,0.0048079533,0.0022567988,0.20171115,0.0023607982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.287699,0.00020036277,0.0006789428,0.06109721,0.0012095346,0.5640057,0.011219035,0.00027956875,0.0005983082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.72280204,0.00013235015,0.0005917305,0.16146706,0.00039372663,0.2953592,0.0012674893,0.0020429234,0.00009911791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022890032,0.000058767673,0.007836209,0.00004256203,0.000022275864,0.000006420487,0.00009561812,8.1058045e-7,0.0005219721,0.0013587401,0.75598377,0.23404996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006852571,0.00036292916,0.0058855796,0.0005647473,0.000024243076,0.0001009551,0.00030381812,0.00027444874,0.00030945466,0.0224426,0.9688714,0.00017455476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002242742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013769621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68930316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033168384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015680831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99413073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883553729","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.05","title":"A Mixed-Methods Study of the Ex Post Funding Incentive Policy for Scholarly Publications in Turkey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turkish; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.569235225060658,"score_gpt":0.5980257545883764,"score_spread":0.028790529527718323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883553729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692467,0.00035241965,0.009630237,0.015818253,0.0016321393,0.0006132499,0.000037036938,0.000007623331,0.002662351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98277235,0.000017397566,0.015597364,0.00031516902,0.0006452719,0.000009872844,7.863707e-7,0.00001775463,0.0006240505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98273706,0.0022413575,0.002516778,0.00060242217,0.011108304,0.0007940442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8708125,0.018270954,0.005045766,0.0021113676,0.10268892,0.0010704985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15004483,0.00018946301,0.0005655709,0.08642636,0.0007082945,0.12585263,0.009307895,0.00024123228,0.00007425902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63923246,0.00011084068,0.00035576263,0.20391865,0.00023652661,0.119018406,0.0020649051,0.002306929,0.000007866665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332909,0.0013235118,0.76879114,0.000009104485,0.00010308636,0.0000033769966,0.005418553,0.000038288294,0.009483635,0.0073832767,0.016922537,0.19039018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020201553,0.0011605987,0.92697495,0.00006581564,0.000020654297,0.00002677507,0.025575638,0.0006962215,0.0008428423,0.016420431,0.026026703,0.00016918703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008675692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022565905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48918763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061845634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017719865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883757404","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.010","title":"Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of six major psychiatry journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychiatric Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Rank correlation; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Impact factor; Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Multivariate analysis; Statistics; Medicine; Library science; Mathematics; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.5968616088670978,"score_gpt":0.6301201752005898,"score_spread":0.033258566333492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883757404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795207,0.01046674,0.0048508947,0.001671984,0.0017979047,0.0002836881,0.00009756198,0.000005211017,0.001305363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867042,0.0021328945,0.010376019,0.00004538997,0.00044976952,0.0000036306833,0.0000022143852,0.000020682939,0.00026523645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614793,0.0016991335,0.005244855,0.00064433325,0.02985787,0.0010744829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93443704,0.010218004,0.0054369783,0.001395311,0.04760624,0.00090643094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08591991,0.00026720666,0.0017956293,0.8672909,0.0005002534,0.001646327,0.006129359,0.0002896029,0.001351759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07156113,0.00018634829,0.0010789467,0.93099636,0.001000055,0.0011621555,0.0006614576,0.0014897891,0.00009409264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026624725,0.0008762339,0.930644,0.00004460936,0.0006391684,0.0000060359876,0.00030102298,0.000054982498,0.0010743319,0.0004084448,0.026820043,0.03886488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008096612,0.0019882878,0.9844057,0.00006087221,0.0003194894,0.00001889264,0.0016948208,0.0021644838,0.0005258755,0.0056808433,0.0021587138,0.00017237711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017682479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006518977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06370548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017435463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015753772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956113},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2884205353","doi":"10.4995/carma2018.2018.8333","title":"Validation of innovation indicators from companies’ websites","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Web mining; Computer science; Data science; Measure (data warehouse); Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Business; Data mining; World Wide Web; Web page; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.5691687130048282,"score_gpt":0.5754617317958987,"score_spread":0.0062930187910704705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884205353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94315,0.00002621985,0.015676167,0.00022854964,0.0002794392,0.00007743004,0.000023608363,0.000015861586,0.04052272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952422,0.0000054138272,0.0029836085,0.000085716085,0.00009395123,0.0000013489213,0.000015214748,0.0000033347792,0.0015692039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367803,0.00009126477,0.00071815104,0.0003257833,0.0050048176,0.0001819266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919885,0.0020919717,0.00036515086,0.00047326728,0.0050015124,0.00007964279],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00893884,0.00006153769,0.00016028661,0.09904146,0.00010154747,0.00056665577,0.0010835339,0.000063611325,0.0076913256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02405754,0.000040480674,0.00003141233,0.4176226,0.0002181489,0.0004397665,0.0002921421,0.00006832859,0.0013311546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015789392,0.00009918128,0.8277314,9.545288e-7,0.00001326176,3.253921e-7,0.00015933708,0.0000035552032,0.025754087,0.014610614,0.042270638,0.08934091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026429413,0.00016951801,0.5497403,0.0000032168825,0.0000025782517,2.567296e-7,0.00033514822,0.002312239,0.38587064,0.030259386,0.030943418,0.00009903444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013276539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057771963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36011654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026700725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009596695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884457462","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.1-2.05","title":"Awareness of Altmetrics among LIS Scholars and Faculty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Library science; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3458624147787211,"score_gpt":0.5465233660001863,"score_spread":0.20066095122146516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884457462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885651,0.00018884511,0.004870232,0.00074981374,0.0008420832,0.00012400893,0.000024125704,0.000003088337,0.004632704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922206,0.00030332527,0.006890776,0.00025058642,0.000084702355,0.0000015939042,0.0000027381,0.0000018155946,0.000243873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961375,0.000033219083,0.00087246206,0.00013154584,0.002653037,0.0001722116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929344,0.00082328875,0.0010510994,0.00018372027,0.0046722535,0.0003352251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009302679,0.000063328436,0.00016711066,0.03249646,0.00037134407,0.0024334155,0.00097485137,0.000046615954,0.000059712183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018748032,0.00004158217,0.000047260026,0.06380589,0.0007496789,0.05961771,0.00021765538,0.00010031012,0.0000038993567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055504264,0.00008984932,0.60766083,0.00002678958,0.0000064498804,6.7760816e-8,0.0015337127,0.000008476522,0.00041240256,0.025585035,0.01034059,0.35428032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434852,0.0004731512,0.8599209,0.000027177544,0.000004875361,0.000019796216,0.0026989246,0.0030604445,0.010054627,0.0066076615,0.11669835,0.000090619964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023785526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.926079e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3541897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014766601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012782189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884599176","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.01","title":"Early Career Researchers' Quest for Reputation in the Digital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Desk; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7239339683949573,"score_gpt":0.5697957248491814,"score_spread":0.15413824354577588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884599176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96541494,0.0005082483,0.0035013144,0.013424897,0.0006165301,0.00024952847,0.00002048049,0.0000054484567,0.01625862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632096,0.000018319803,0.0016027724,0.00037845204,0.0008220896,0.0000039411575,0.0000020024847,0.000009676492,0.0008417947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831911,0.00049843837,0.0011594818,0.00035457883,0.014220049,0.00057635753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614531,0.010817143,0.0008574481,0.00064670935,0.025775133,0.000450489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1395951,0.00009813436,0.00023944814,0.035928737,0.00033289212,0.30096912,0.0054880385,0.0001687004,0.000044225504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47680813,0.000054463566,0.00019337544,0.07974484,0.0001927125,0.09142416,0.00039307898,0.0015741144,0.000031094434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023429313,0.00022336406,0.37237158,0.00000681369,0.000032562166,0.00018210695,0.0056148022,0.000013283005,0.0006426734,0.004159913,0.13961817,0.47690043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012199235,0.0012040266,0.7071711,0.0000433191,0.0000056406243,0.00007671696,0.0062667173,0.0003155942,0.00013027308,0.05537402,0.22804727,0.00014541773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010217861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003596282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.476755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021753063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045408943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885706996","doi":"","title":"Grant Hunting in Corporatized Universities: Experiences from Canada and Finland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Public administration; Economic history; History; Economics","score_opus":0.22508561001555577,"score_gpt":0.4409658864400707,"score_spread":0.2158802764245149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885706996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920721,0.0011298034,0.00003980233,0.00068276026,0.0014468243,0.00016753365,0.00011961735,0.000010393632,0.0043311496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943479,0.00009774603,0.0005635581,0.00026823682,0.0001275092,0.000009543087,0.000008556349,0.000008716428,0.0045682737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513906,0.00041467766,0.0007963687,0.0007845938,0.0022104324,0.00065484166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909955,0.006373342,0.0005656257,0.0005462207,0.0012510358,0.00026827317],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004368445,0.00021430098,0.00065887795,0.009749402,0.00032793774,0.00027558918,0.0016458494,0.0001728163,0.0017414853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038632292,0.00016495782,0.00007575061,0.01807458,0.0027508552,0.00042503228,0.0006691043,0.00032179765,0.000056550474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018027455,0.00008343587,0.8750949,0.0000101629885,0.00007235733,0.00008734784,0.009985146,0.0000057169855,0.00070497626,0.00078995916,0.09990704,0.013078667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039458205,0.00046106015,0.8193718,0.000088279616,0.000026616537,0.00000727535,0.073004946,0.0026063547,0.003551367,0.014269754,0.08180894,0.0008577606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25828564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39810455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1398189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015634201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096294185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885938669","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137","title":"Canadian and South African Scholars’ Use of Institutional Repositories, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Public relations; Institutional repository; Political science; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Sociology; Publishing; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5306997556260317,"score_gpt":0.5178407325566584,"score_spread":0.012859023069373254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885938669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8750034,0.0029474786,0.00002158431,0.094062425,0.00020139042,0.0003146978,0.00007641922,0.0000032118435,0.027369417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619114,0.0016045057,0.00035834382,0.00089081994,0.00015471551,0.000001953332,0.0000028836723,0.0000042143083,0.00079144875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947701,0.00095416524,0.0006786055,0.00017353319,0.0028889738,0.00053461746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885597,0.005617732,0.0003633213,0.00025094123,0.0030243364,0.0021839237],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026037483,0.000092507464,0.00018044838,0.018232256,0.0019183458,0.0071093976,0.0006536577,0.00020638046,0.00007959263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053126685,0.00005647423,0.000026029533,0.018209266,0.0019946175,0.030379878,0.00026203733,0.001486199,0.000008312278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010047813,0.000034105007,0.5537235,0.000105175306,0.000176484,0.00015131029,0.028797273,0.00001866937,0.00007314928,0.20966075,0.086233,0.12002176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029771467,0.00038808418,0.13797596,0.00003849316,0.000007915942,0.00036261656,0.007623207,0.00039059133,0.00015313712,0.0024233563,0.85025203,0.0000869046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022795854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071229152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.764019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000635569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056525837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886105060","doi":"10.1017/pan.2018.12","title":"Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Analysis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":550,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Citation; Gender gap; Politics; Publication; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social science; Gender studies; Political science; Demographic economics; Law","score_opus":0.7631996924929744,"score_gpt":0.6632523770784542,"score_spread":0.09994731541452018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886105060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88867104,0.0000131230345,0.09433028,0.007060594,0.00022284516,0.00007689318,0.000066219734,0.000022929024,0.009536047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564177,0.0000016347319,0.0023109175,0.0015701911,0.00026311274,0.000004956567,0.0000020079704,0.000004805709,0.00020058113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844006,0.00038715932,0.0006525869,0.0013061805,0.010404167,0.0028493465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98320943,0.0049329097,0.00012165158,0.0006477749,0.009483914,0.0016043014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04989302,0.00015378278,0.00046574598,0.038726673,0.001787142,0.0033724273,0.0023963447,0.00013774661,0.0005256087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094308086,0.00011025802,0.00018516397,0.21812885,0.009468182,0.0007947875,0.001566442,0.0002523584,0.0001344868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011308493,0.00006803451,0.18730672,0.000003383315,0.00005071135,0.0000050047274,0.0006596386,4.5419588e-7,0.0013376167,0.788995,0.00011175866,0.02145035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018483253,0.00013553059,0.8681669,8.4183426e-7,0.00007970794,0.000007315601,0.0032517852,0.017263012,0.004508124,0.10593908,0.0002692346,0.00019358509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00102402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118187585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68305594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038574456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000643226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887204237","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.3.2018-0008.08","title":"Does Interdisciplinary Integration Affect LIS Doctoral Students’ Publishing Productivity and Quality in North America?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Productivity; Library science; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Discipline; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Social science; Economic growth; Medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.26239301872770476,"score_gpt":0.5439334882733927,"score_spread":0.28154046954568795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887204237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892758,0.000052226806,0.0027424772,0.0048757168,0.0014021916,0.0002375069,0.000013792072,0.0000052087303,0.0013950584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701726,0.000078200785,0.0022287997,0.00029691833,0.00020900481,0.000005988971,0.000005595543,0.0000018994551,0.00015631862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591947,0.00012960819,0.00093510334,0.00021939054,0.0025873384,0.0002090855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955623,0.00099402,0.00094008504,0.0002208977,0.002018234,0.0002644752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013275353,0.000082955296,0.00019088098,0.01966197,0.00037373978,0.009070433,0.0011687599,0.000037692433,0.000037642854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018104022,0.000043992713,0.000042691147,0.040691335,0.0005611408,0.12129998,0.0006390553,0.0001917366,0.0000032971036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102553335,0.000117161784,0.58356655,0.000013122946,0.0000024087512,6.448019e-8,0.004882431,0.0000035175078,0.00016576753,0.0025536816,0.0019062114,0.40668654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492913,0.00035028686,0.9724027,0.000022088016,0.0000017178064,0.0000053915314,0.006239845,0.00067389064,0.0008878212,0.0035987599,0.015488055,0.000080143436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064555834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009249073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4066064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004786398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065437716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99195826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887998895","doi":"10.7554/elife.29319","title":"Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Open science; Incentive; Thematic analysis; Public relations; Science policy; Open data; Intellectual property; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.8882448692560714,"score_gpt":0.7166902763157139,"score_spread":0.17155459294035746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887998895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96252584,0.00008962285,0.00037681573,0.0010455006,0.00018355354,0.0002457227,0.000007146835,0.000007154553,0.035518635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964773,0.000034962017,0.0008646605,0.00007570779,0.000036749836,0.000021748072,0.0000010484916,0.000005932051,0.0024818676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.987984,0.00025847967,0.0005099533,0.00084132754,0.009642397,0.0007638594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338555,0.0023974546,0.00034166308,0.0014046553,0.002074493,0.00039618212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07643422,0.00008600432,0.00019560414,0.016304566,0.0014354874,0.016250651,0.011060897,0.00004919707,0.00032911528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2732339,0.000063495565,0.00002244144,0.0548518,0.00077954965,0.0038829527,0.0068694684,0.00025773968,0.00024998566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009298966,0.00008101091,0.8641995,8.4036674e-7,0.0000011927526,0.0000042338643,0.00030762606,0.000007994374,0.009055301,0.00044018638,0.005046217,0.12084657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352518,0.000055608994,0.977972,0.000015145126,3.2749415e-7,2.0524527e-7,0.00050323905,0.0059440793,0.010996776,0.0012588685,0.0028106645,0.00009058215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087910343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007614627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19679967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039932143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888923337","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401040","title":"On the citation advantage of tweeted papers at the journal level","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Library science; Political science; Information retrieval; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.2756307317455509,"score_gpt":0.47831595135518995,"score_spread":0.20268521960963903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888923337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555479,0.000014868843,0.00005240692,0.025487809,0.0002477153,0.00035393282,0.000028510312,0.0000065683453,0.018260235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989851,0.00005996979,0.00007274252,0.00014368279,0.000008149992,0.000008903568,2.170893e-7,0.0000014499483,0.0007197515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441487,0.000011319328,0.0005065496,0.000111709516,0.0047206054,0.00023497916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840466,0.0018699839,0.0026567236,0.00028514426,0.011101198,0.00004036661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035367552,0.00006036071,0.00012132769,0.006999161,0.0026997367,0.0012346538,0.00334475,0.00008663242,0.000010703973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21525265,0.000025225923,0.00005390179,0.022612188,0.0009337864,0.00232703,0.00070432195,0.00017615048,0.000008021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840477,0.000041518295,0.32386822,0.000017045051,0.000034242927,1.5250324e-8,0.001992294,0.000013537022,0.047652844,0.43832472,0.027463738,0.16051343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185375,0.00043132834,0.59101266,0.00003722672,0.000028024993,0.000011829055,0.013857143,0.003310865,0.1712323,0.16666117,0.052053023,0.00017907571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000048268853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030048873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27166355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019461941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013876172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889499003","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.180154","title":"How predatory journals leak into PubMed","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Key (lock); Data science; Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.3334433946008996,"score_gpt":0.49615533824865493,"score_spread":0.16271194364775532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889499003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41811004,0.0046129115,0.009230076,0.49973026,0.015018801,0.00049344194,0.000093361334,0.00005080419,0.0526603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742511,0.000494603,0.00024222457,0.0061596506,0.0058349804,0.0000070961364,0.0000013371813,0.0000141316705,0.012994914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711182,0.0007254727,0.0008256675,0.00039136317,0.02564573,0.001293546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762717,0.0021838038,0.00064313784,0.0003524112,0.012872343,0.0076766363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.081073776,0.0001390894,0.00031107126,0.03402918,0.0010814692,0.010648636,0.0027977617,0.00055010524,0.01038845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3063317,0.00009917778,0.00020366542,0.065459564,0.00020763416,0.0013078277,0.00016406787,0.0014972622,0.0011711649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022139843,0.000012483178,0.10155125,5.924e-7,0.000024893747,0.000119374425,0.00012342192,2.1349014e-7,0.0000059008603,0.00010704813,0.44962513,0.44842747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037535562,0.00006154756,0.14908528,0.00001317011,0.0000033680515,0.00018016706,0.00050850585,0.0004152021,0.000030059055,0.005552176,0.84365284,0.00012230406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007693563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031135788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.556141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019717785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005237541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960655},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2891139263","doi":"10.1108/ajim-02-2018-0023","title":"The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; China; Web of science; Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Scale (ratio); Publishing; Library science; Bibliometrics; Political science; Business; Geography; MEDLINE; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.3792237862291387,"score_gpt":0.5586849296211596,"score_spread":0.17946114339202085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891139263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7128447,0.000730066,0.26693943,0.0021669755,0.00033827333,0.00046730303,0.000054753822,0.0000028938664,0.016455565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960463,0.0010900769,0.0017514045,0.00007724999,0.00001904345,0.0000016729731,0.0000011501176,0.0000014251508,0.0010116558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957057,0.00007312594,0.0009911609,0.00009019107,0.0029760795,0.00016368991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540854,0.00056578324,0.0010992627,0.000249579,0.002554949,0.000121872086],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0182245,0.00006191116,0.00018993735,0.01953377,0.00021403897,0.005533517,0.0021032637,0.00001911037,0.00004816403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020029547,0.000032347238,0.000048135964,0.051103182,0.00018338734,0.00556894,0.0021823463,0.00007823351,0.000010877988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022964584,0.000055947618,0.14160486,0.000026925738,0.0006281127,0.0000022457107,0.00094288524,0.00060297584,0.00001572888,0.012090152,0.03175246,0.8120481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005868672,0.00016625173,0.92916834,0.000012391523,0.000069227324,0.0000040461323,0.0020448058,0.017855883,0.00003423382,0.015404024,0.034593903,0.000060003586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062583444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055893448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81198806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063077685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056222994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99549884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891257676","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.8801","title":"8. Le transfert des connaissances au CRDITED de Montréal","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.1954363911221218,"score_gpt":0.35558859408030685,"score_spread":0.16015220295818505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891257676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054856796,0.10678845,0.016157662,0.0015127248,0.0006247937,0.00082745106,0.000545053,0.00015436899,0.8185327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206316,0.0149866175,0.002184402,0.0002528474,0.00041020196,0.000021146423,0.000028653143,0.00012468713,0.26135984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98893607,0.0005938509,0.0010463935,0.0014690151,0.004955164,0.0029995104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934543,0.0042610164,0.0005205346,0.0012999529,0.0019450918,0.002627955],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068731494,0.000943581,0.0012152906,0.017976033,0.0026381293,0.001393479,0.004264127,0.0012609985,0.007845741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002189947,0.0009207204,0.00094400183,0.0060850717,0.0025900318,0.00084608054,0.0019293213,0.0012856507,0.00073111645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013055508,0.00040570693,0.048412528,0.00029679135,0.0008364721,0.0020407785,0.010143756,0.00069332926,0.0064079864,0.16260137,0.023362836,0.7434929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024151548,0.0004922599,0.06940783,0.00030797173,0.0004538093,0.0005266214,0.001697747,0.004186906,0.006590324,0.04140881,0.8710128,0.0014997553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06477838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0274548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033376105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016434588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891358922","doi":"","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Library science; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; English language; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.8790385872218804,"score_gpt":0.7668242092888382,"score_spread":0.11221437793304223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891358922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968034,0.0047670845,0.0092907045,0.002677395,0.0003507683,0.00064251904,0.0002426237,0.0000050441004,0.013989802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8838767,0.00054875045,0.114401266,0.00022454862,0.000010529576,0.00004569387,0.0000043719915,0.000011548898,0.00087660603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608893,0.008483156,0.0011504672,0.0009280265,0.0029128147,0.00043659497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232477,0.071864516,0.0013403982,0.001772143,0.0015980599,0.00017716654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064378716,0.00022220208,0.0010459211,0.55816,0.00050483807,0.01656952,0.008974403,0.00013363188,0.00013079698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25758505,0.0001223615,0.00021646479,0.834519,0.0014306215,0.006781475,0.0053850645,0.0004980281,0.000005538369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660429,0.00022943765,0.5169576,0.00002534844,0.00019663354,0.000008607911,0.033372097,0.000056757683,0.0002577525,0.36478114,0.000514643,0.08333395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042923624,0.00017453356,0.765057,0.00009199074,0.000020013933,1.6142455e-7,0.009150799,0.0011885402,0.0014302992,0.2219257,0.00039781345,0.00013385886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080342655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002613502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27635902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041464402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021693026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99638754},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2893220905","doi":"10.5958/0976-2469.2018.00031.3","title":"Leishmaniasis: Scientometric assessment of global research output","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Herald","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leishmaniasis; Veterinary medicine; Engineering; Mathematics; Toxicology; Biotechnology; Biology; Medicine; Immunology","score_opus":0.696879119625453,"score_gpt":0.6461404453737221,"score_spread":0.05073867425173095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893220905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7623872,0.0007927713,0.0009325708,0.0037231918,0.0009825659,0.00034727508,0.00009358143,0.000068975154,0.23067187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818739,0.00011107703,0.006394752,0.0003350436,0.00038989054,0.0000126315845,0.000004659579,0.00001751608,0.01086053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797925,0.0008892186,0.0010531575,0.0011602541,0.015886677,0.0012182078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975605,0.003638903,0.0002913104,0.00168352,0.0038433871,0.0007868593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025722083,0.00019298273,0.00045785232,0.07173087,0.00051141914,0.0034830088,0.005674353,0.00017823515,0.004181603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012591923,0.00013718534,0.00021613688,0.55294865,0.0009578477,0.0028392342,0.0027856098,0.0004460499,0.0009985173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024649471,0.00028956545,0.6807408,0.0000077645445,0.000017850667,0.000013514644,0.000041975483,0.000004511656,0.00018403283,0.02606767,0.19099441,0.10161328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044693958,0.000765337,0.7991494,0.000015962758,0.000002731621,0.0000059812332,0.00019875057,0.003525851,0.001246174,0.036280792,0.15818045,0.00018166423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001245655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013022727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4812178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016752681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010013281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894658923","doi":"10.15273/pnsis.v43i2.3643","title":"THE NOVA SCOTIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: STUDENT SCIENCE AWARDS 2004","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova (rocket); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.23757522911964377,"score_gpt":0.49037568914838203,"score_spread":0.25280046002873824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894658923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468109,0.000425032,0.00027556575,0.0017406022,0.020279398,0.0008799318,0.000029838662,0.000029406217,0.029529314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940028,0.000061440274,0.0038039726,0.00006587621,0.00014305528,0.0000068405197,2.5458277e-7,0.000014147417,0.0019015959],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582954,0.000024920191,0.002324117,0.0020054425,0.035290003,0.0020601247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97049016,0.0004893463,0.0022996855,0.0017380537,0.02427239,0.0007103555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.080154635,0.00042966168,0.00075135456,0.035128403,0.00415166,0.004254036,0.032951154,0.00012452534,0.000050954433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044559754,0.0002393597,0.0003290237,0.36372513,0.11285698,0.009192501,0.006852044,0.00059441675,0.000038732396],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006482897,0.0008072623,0.13883227,0.000091497925,0.0000207826,0.000002834512,0.0011726822,0.0012745825,0.7169479,0.103275366,0.011056167,0.026453784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009228247,0.00037204602,0.3526124,0.00031898936,0.00003052018,0.000047080863,0.0022470367,0.002263402,0.6098168,0.010707374,0.02008963,0.00057190075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017949835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024653587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3285967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007284594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008095924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895416954","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.16493.1","title":"The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":344,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Syracuse University; Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Publication; Scholarship; Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Prestige; Scholarly communication; Institution; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Altmetrics; Publish or perish; Open science; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7905803533225655,"score_gpt":0.6613001445891282,"score_spread":0.12928020873343726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895416954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506749,0.02797989,0.00007951331,0.016952936,0.00042134552,0.0025923573,0.000072917246,0.0000140010725,0.0012121514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98453313,0.012954411,0.00015664156,0.000010040832,0.0014129458,0.00025658435,0.000015785508,0.000023628776,0.00063683745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96661323,0.0029768196,0.0011710668,0.0015109282,0.026830673,0.00089729135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761253,0.0056702844,0.00045678078,0.0011787171,0.01619352,0.00037538077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15424773,0.0002321476,0.0004015414,0.026572378,0.00039938916,0.0027217702,0.0028327121,0.00067733193,0.00013340781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060906786,0.00013596771,0.000059320737,0.064821005,0.0009636439,0.0005962712,0.005148014,0.0024834052,0.000026504109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009350224,0.000103771155,0.2978988,0.00024568487,0.000022618147,0.00000330692,0.00055139966,0.000022735845,0.00020364572,0.00011568122,0.008617598,0.69212127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006846238,0.00023602085,0.82964253,0.00017141733,0.00001634067,0.000008461878,0.0005786497,0.016140772,0.0006057981,0.13626488,0.015450306,0.0002002185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007525212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000638734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69192106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018543242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017163486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998179},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2895831373","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.06","title":"Dynamics of Journal Impact Factors and Limits to Their Inflation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Statistics; Dynamics (music); Econometrics; Extrapolation; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.447630236235392,"score_gpt":0.5249796450590765,"score_spread":0.07734940882368446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895831373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840262,0.00041117094,0.008602442,0.0049562096,0.0008223767,0.00006656032,0.000020948622,0.0000031966642,0.0010909077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968805,0.00009106706,0.0023569826,0.000106559564,0.00046788843,1.1371847e-7,6.399217e-7,0.000009662007,0.00008663651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889944,0.0003181364,0.0014220235,0.00023083978,0.008622805,0.00041177793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644247,0.0032139902,0.0017361186,0.00033124906,0.029182598,0.0011113439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057099577,0.00014242307,0.00041817373,0.056698967,0.00034396088,0.093366526,0.002717692,0.00018151666,0.00015756975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22687237,0.00007676118,0.0002351709,0.06502324,0.00011861272,0.071746975,0.0004692263,0.001431889,0.000006803011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053757383,0.00004245686,0.8758141,0.0000016667375,0.000039930055,0.0000058608985,0.000924752,0.00003335299,0.0029263208,0.00023021293,0.00621649,0.11371113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000428857,0.0011279681,0.97951066,0.00004404513,0.000008161217,0.0001826453,0.0020764545,0.001260086,0.0011781048,0.01137241,0.002703199,0.00010742415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050397444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030553696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1697728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032928682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054290134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896024286","doi":"10.1504/ijtm.2019.10016976","title":"Citation impact of public and private funding on nanotechnology-related publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Public funding; Citation impact; Economics; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.3907934107378278,"score_gpt":0.5537485753717843,"score_spread":0.16295516463395654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896024286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667194,0.00015427356,0.0118357055,0.01675022,0.00058417016,0.00012043856,0.0000075901457,0.000029338884,0.003798901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571955,0.0002707729,0.0035439213,0.000032472813,0.00003305793,0.000003352515,0.0000011912565,0.0000055149403,0.00039016386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561286,0.000058621015,0.0008721882,0.0002635132,0.0029477882,0.0002450339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323815,0.00040683724,0.00096987997,0.00036484728,0.0049243905,0.00009590715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007064827,0.00009485204,0.00020283544,0.10072918,0.000092364324,0.00042236256,0.0026426085,0.00014923258,0.00029020506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011362403,0.00006565702,0.00012324577,0.0411709,0.0004958533,0.0005029081,0.00075905706,0.00026106538,0.000051024657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034142846,0.00021977774,0.122488864,0.0000017059351,0.00045823367,0.000017302307,0.000035855766,0.000024121162,0.0021315475,0.29183114,0.0038737133,0.5788836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001882498,0.0023557132,0.5364898,0.00007230676,0.000028679799,0.0001931149,0.0006617773,0.002614916,0.0044927755,0.41605017,0.034947023,0.00021126021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037478494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015494156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57867235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023418482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058829293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896552281","doi":"10.3390/publications6040041","title":"Planning for Academic Publishing after Retirement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Publishing; Publication; Research Assessment Exercise; Public relations; Mandatory retirement; Political science; Labour economics; Management; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Higher education; Computer science","score_opus":0.8246445626788835,"score_gpt":0.6557962135259534,"score_spread":0.16884834915293012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896552281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3423231,0.0014267112,0.33767334,0.15412928,0.0021087353,0.0016667736,0.00031639682,0.00028183302,0.16007383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838633,0.000010904166,0.00562306,0.0009086087,0.0005351238,0.00033523916,0.000017957647,0.000009893883,0.008695898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428487,0.00006644557,0.00053808535,0.00058805436,0.0039824373,0.0005400852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887775,0.002851789,0.00020640942,0.0008471866,0.006925455,0.00039164655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01733102,0.000083890765,0.00012358838,0.029345058,0.00045998924,0.0076286164,0.0024893086,0.00012364812,0.0010746727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09851095,0.00006253459,0.000086482316,0.0994497,0.0001661417,0.0028269973,0.0005071962,0.00024610394,0.00043268764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015554548,0.00004859895,0.17802747,0.0000023078285,0.00000927893,2.5345622e-7,0.00039087812,0.000002339474,0.00024729216,0.02018286,0.7142693,0.08680387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015582732,0.000047566617,0.24046743,0.000003894714,0.000002651864,0.0000012756254,0.00016651175,0.0034291996,0.00024382622,0.020328073,0.73506343,0.00009029492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001076377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005377557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6415402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009636036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018685797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896781104","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-52-69","title":"Transactions in science in comparative perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Perspective (graphical); Database transaction; Transactional leadership; Productivity; Academic freedom; Transactional analysis; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Public relations; Higher education; Law; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Psychology","score_opus":0.6674340443599226,"score_gpt":0.6255319469027476,"score_spread":0.04190209745717499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896781104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94163287,0.00011805636,0.0025703583,0.0008592703,0.0005147164,0.00030599703,0.00000923642,0.000013644134,0.05397585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980798,0.000013997966,0.0006493016,0.000059386774,0.00005326192,0.000021581272,1.5995462e-7,0.000004395601,0.0011181529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463755,0.00010950869,0.000521442,0.00090365484,0.0031535754,0.00067426544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558306,0.0011480642,0.00009919758,0.0005481551,0.002368157,0.00025334148],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013785282,0.00011863475,0.00028157188,0.06846758,0.00027731634,0.0011913779,0.001970646,0.000063318555,0.0007326561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004865436,0.00009161465,0.000060741608,0.23992373,0.00138141,0.0011343762,0.00016144726,0.0002940341,0.000748618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032451414,0.0016325045,0.7815745,0.0000053008266,0.0000139831,0.000041936102,0.029647931,0.00081051356,0.014257351,0.036013164,0.0017843919,0.13389392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008805699,0.00027257347,0.934016,0.000010213998,0.0000010794225,0.0000048582856,0.011406917,0.027481996,0.007327888,0.013799907,0.0045703994,0.00022759323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011734251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027210326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17145616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007846619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006885833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897215433","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.08","title":"Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Publishing; Enthusiasm; Scholarly communication; Perception; Social media; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.758141670926953,"score_gpt":0.6392867207315888,"score_spread":0.11885495019536418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897215433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5990026,0.04902576,0.008671069,0.30186382,0.004470392,0.0031026965,0.00022317005,0.000035302906,0.03360518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95287555,0.0071098404,0.013674828,0.017460732,0.0014691785,0.000017775465,0.000004906275,0.00006054189,0.0073266677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.963189,0.0013691935,0.0035637082,0.0012032903,0.029406738,0.0012680707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77658755,0.0065591517,0.005138132,0.0019186791,0.20490092,0.004895574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31423882,0.0003829981,0.0016074291,0.058375504,0.0012692852,0.83007383,0.047222,0.0004042124,0.0018578268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74306494,0.00026191704,0.00029197396,0.18360923,0.0002909422,0.50997126,0.027866332,0.003996487,0.00013187176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004812728,0.00010988504,0.49586335,0.000017526903,0.00008058001,0.000050669078,0.00012810562,0.0000013775418,0.00013308058,0.00029834875,0.464008,0.039260957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011700437,0.0005539239,0.6398397,0.00048911467,0.000062440966,0.00015350408,0.0003138107,0.000013684741,0.00017866802,0.004578036,0.3523437,0.0003033778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081484666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012184648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42882612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056730636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018866401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897574271","doi":"10.3389/fenvs.2018.00115","title":"Enhancing Climate Change Research With Open Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Front (military); Environmental science; Climate science; Environmental resource management; Climatology; Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.5067970912365414,"score_gpt":0.556646742907669,"score_spread":0.04984965167112765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897574271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663223,0.00022978128,0.0019028968,0.0005020151,0.0011780097,0.0009510384,0.000017669656,0.0000139738495,0.028882315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777775,0.00019398374,0.02122842,0.00016795115,0.00011592491,0.00006170792,5.514168e-7,0.000011689369,0.00044227252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735967,0.00023706668,0.00054200174,0.0021576053,0.021074064,0.0023925984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.0004911782,0.00016846154,0.0015227105,0.000607374,0.0008490575],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11270714,0.00018313719,0.00030321916,0.04948754,0.0027368534,0.0061449637,0.018429385,0.00006448235,0.0004093538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006855546,0.00012445675,0.00003278663,0.24509555,0.020130685,0.0061657783,0.011491069,0.0004484551,0.0006718458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811423,0.00023296465,0.7627765,0.0000019002309,0.0000015059699,0.000027603666,0.0013691712,0.0000040777513,0.036172844,0.00062622764,0.0012403104,0.19746578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006530798,0.00090896216,0.9153002,0.00004308531,0.0000014771282,0.00001623754,0.0068591326,0.0053974823,0.056492258,0.0042033955,0.009748863,0.0003758415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023163162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010467446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19708994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014974314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005813729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898324775","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w","title":"Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Free access; Scale (ratio); Open access journal; Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Physics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8984324794612757,"score_gpt":0.7476529375393673,"score_spread":0.15077954192190834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898324775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24452613,0.0012807308,0.004058033,0.06896593,0.0047128918,0.0026109044,0.00017383964,0.00009313629,0.6735784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610785,0.000023568928,0.002781504,0.0042078975,0.00042305587,0.000024385654,0.0000052035193,0.000019110188,0.031436756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97977823,0.0005945775,0.00052921614,0.0013257626,0.016552648,0.0012195572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812552,0.004804685,0.00013472792,0.0018360822,0.010739243,0.001230065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05361609,0.00017424277,0.00033565392,0.06392747,0.0009891362,0.03350686,0.024494207,0.0009753414,0.0077316733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07992079,0.00011640696,0.000102496604,0.25807247,0.00044231841,0.0025403635,0.013957712,0.0033685453,0.004460488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006855531,0.000046232974,0.010003772,0.0000019496608,0.000008958274,0.00001053181,0.00045386716,0.0000042009083,0.00020703743,0.009206676,0.9086781,0.07131008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029736274,0.00027835983,0.04489061,0.000014889472,0.0000014437766,0.000003932486,0.00077150704,0.00041100886,0.00092861516,0.06198521,0.8902304,0.00018667344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000469998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030879205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7165524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023300386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004892462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898390052","doi":"","title":"The state and evolution of Gold Open Access: A country level analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Repository (Leiden University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Quarter (Canadian coin); China; Demography; Geography; MEDLINE; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.41322115289683276,"score_gpt":0.5040019364291944,"score_spread":0.09078078353236169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898390052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95367044,0.0004399869,0.0063158474,0.00023371835,0.00034886468,0.00032522317,0.00003863158,0.000013721187,0.038613535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91528475,0.00010120902,0.00019666673,0.000017966266,0.000051765277,7.867673e-7,9.903797e-7,0.000005613656,0.08434025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945288,0.0004417276,0.00051400415,0.0006906022,0.0034234854,0.00040141647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917148,0.0023781133,0.00056001794,0.0010199602,0.0040498595,0.00027729024],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006975706,0.00013697126,0.00035334995,0.027068175,0.00086591335,0.0054246695,0.0076981704,0.000091403235,0.0000630162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039283233,0.000095446565,0.00013844261,0.15752023,0.0007981999,0.0025941688,0.0052469964,0.00017229801,0.00004055635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014032223,0.00004935345,0.9838076,0.0000039414244,0.00028808514,0.000046072244,0.000106134605,0.000046141184,0.001246656,0.0025764687,0.005619329,0.0060698744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038137412,0.00013412381,0.9650218,0.00000917395,0.00013141759,0.0000074512377,0.0007250862,0.0026992795,0.001389585,0.0026258072,0.026720116,0.00015482077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009269917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002711228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13045205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028497653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045508676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898503602","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2018.09.001","title":"Indicateurs de notoriété des revues scientifiques, des chercheurs et des articles publiés en santé : perspective pharmaceutique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.7309520116639525,"score_gpt":0.6519574842562337,"score_spread":0.07899452740771884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898503602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12725525,0.8500993,0.0026449044,0.0016315277,0.0014929856,0.002339116,0.00075026025,0.00041376913,0.013372871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10238745,0.88087475,0.008939389,0.0009122778,0.0012669617,0.00042707683,0.000058274458,0.00026778903,0.0048660054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674078,0.011679458,0.0034467336,0.0042391964,0.008327025,0.004899781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457249,0.019784302,0.0023027977,0.0023438693,0.025064735,0.004779413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07690822,0.0021634004,0.0031846906,0.045539606,0.0034152316,0.010720846,0.009465579,0.0015393122,0.0069586076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09579687,0.001782559,0.0021811372,0.12915654,0.017126463,0.0060478495,0.0033676543,0.0038381005,0.002796055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019069549,0.0015301987,0.034742042,0.005105665,0.00074092177,0.0002981639,0.023834007,0.000009046107,0.0008524927,0.0011430769,0.021062396,0.9104913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010593414,0.0006327401,0.010748178,0.007706887,0.0007213742,0.00045706553,0.0053491252,0.0006266434,0.01762767,0.035013698,0.9178927,0.0021645576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004402482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013823041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90832675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004013118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063650818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899013035","doi":"10.1002/leap.1206","title":"Sci‐Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; China; Headway; Quarter (Canadian coin); Desk; Promotion (chess); Political science; Engineering; Business; Psychology; Geography; Law; Transport engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5303255250196891,"score_gpt":0.5402152958563844,"score_spread":0.009889770836695289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899013035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769078,0.0150664635,0.012732367,0.33327922,0.0039753946,0.0008330947,0.00009482944,0.00014995562,0.05696088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840934,0.00039400964,0.0016313371,0.004164396,0.0016281568,0.000007795947,0.000007527605,0.000020972268,0.008052402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911255,0.0005330016,0.00051508925,0.00081854546,0.006321054,0.000686801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404443,0.012012785,0.00029379642,0.0015601402,0.0015641776,0.00052465184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027359897,0.00016365503,0.0002461758,0.00457405,0.0012246505,0.051495146,0.0051840106,0.00012816297,0.0022819752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09271747,0.000069667,0.00010192016,0.05043602,0.0005002823,0.0039908914,0.0020020138,0.0006778308,0.0009895202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013336322,0.000014157452,0.02557308,8.215911e-7,0.000015205806,0.0000023075459,0.0015048569,0.0000040049795,0.00008788309,0.001174571,0.41677424,0.5548355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003498381,0.00005232792,0.1232542,0.000016052185,0.000008544556,0.000005039847,0.0015944078,0.0061906585,0.00011516979,0.03162545,0.8366367,0.00015158312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003451351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006281829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5546839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056743338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022485851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899425819","doi":"10.1192/bja.2018.56","title":"Predatory journals and dubious publishers: how to avoid being their prey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BJPsych Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Directory; Revenue; Internet privacy; Declaration; Reading (process); Advertising; World Wide Web; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.46919279975365585,"score_gpt":0.5673250366612027,"score_spread":0.09813223690754685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899425819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92306226,0.01445107,0.011572509,0.010085055,0.002484925,0.0006689073,0.000050752118,0.000074703574,0.037549816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885212,0.00071414135,0.0047565172,0.0006404956,0.00058660435,0.000020739884,7.977191e-7,0.000015643833,0.004743821],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273926,0.00021498308,0.0004856975,0.00093336275,0.0048698215,0.00075685675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287146,0.002018364,0.00024908347,0.000793716,0.0032302386,0.000837114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013098379,0.00019544401,0.000323136,0.023683533,0.00051806803,0.011339254,0.0021974365,0.00010126302,0.0005872411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030185545,0.00012402574,0.00008860857,0.07029672,0.0003217998,0.0046911244,0.00064454024,0.00025336168,0.00026218302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048657705,0.00007806886,0.077717155,0.000008998109,0.000018326326,0.000007051843,0.0006402836,0.0000036839363,0.0018238765,0.00022933487,0.10514548,0.8142791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003533652,0.0004982576,0.060798258,0.000033538563,0.000002567387,0.000023196733,0.00189524,0.00023435564,0.0029814134,0.02471877,0.90820116,0.00025989753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006902663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045357156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8140192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049950486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010762837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896871},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2899440325","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1191","title":"Tread Carefully: Managing Identities and Expectations in High-Tech Industry–Academia Collaborations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"FedDev Ontario","keywords":"Commercialization; Tread; Open innovation; Work (physics); High tech; Business; Key (lock); Marketing; Engineering; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3813168633560889,"score_gpt":0.5538592302944852,"score_spread":0.17254236693839636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899440325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7841157,0.043403365,0.011390196,0.107073255,0.0007647455,0.0033958177,0.000044575867,0.0004972453,0.049315147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96457505,0.022503108,0.004516925,0.0017991007,0.000054976437,0.00033098625,0.000024889105,0.000016024931,0.0061789113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583036,0.00010542473,0.0011155916,0.0006399502,0.0019265778,0.00038211033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960685,0.00024025873,0.00038620172,0.0007050526,0.0025413681,0.000058631023],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006474722,0.00015724615,0.00035207436,0.07345301,0.00029614585,0.00051149685,0.0011614483,0.00038130593,0.00045675767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074470965,0.00013327236,0.000023573826,0.33764777,0.00041019995,0.00062310474,0.00072516396,0.00067092176,0.00025440674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002158242,0.00004330732,0.04097822,0.00013996406,0.000023859753,0.000014653052,0.00004624148,0.0000012720453,0.00006302073,0.62916136,0.039628126,0.28989783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015516881,0.00033723342,0.12295885,0.001570077,0.00008964891,0.000027060885,0.007228392,0.0004875779,0.0007372855,0.5208674,0.3432762,0.0008685663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024290108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005966554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30364808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014578496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006762642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9370486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899615849","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Citation Management Tools: EndNote X7 & EndNote Basic","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7038710499497854,"score_gpt":0.571306249908074,"score_spread":0.13256480004171145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899615849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006449845,0.0045116,0.004562687,0.0052922983,0.006914555,0.0011635191,0.000748847,0.00025228813,0.97590923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049473713,0.013947949,0.015600617,0.0017490817,0.0014322093,0.000092387985,0.0005570515,0.0001234548,0.9615499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97171646,0.00050763245,0.0022178493,0.0026175636,0.021448972,0.0014915251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98287326,0.0077658757,0.0013285788,0.0048391796,0.0023205497,0.00087254035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021643024,0.0007213237,0.0011560875,0.13532837,0.0009885414,0.03306406,0.014394658,0.0007825476,0.018568495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040414553,0.00050358626,0.0007754172,0.099254556,0.00038933384,0.004977358,0.0053767427,0.0009678534,0.007529426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012128698,0.000050053535,0.00041135392,0.000038979404,0.000059533635,0.00010756081,0.000023914221,0.000007125148,0.0000046818545,0.0024163432,0.5798034,0.41706493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004686999,0.00012973795,0.010288863,0.00011002596,0.00003747069,0.000007462473,0.00023929408,0.0008534426,0.00018139518,0.023519889,0.9635217,0.0006420108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020840648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034497352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41642293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020575496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006546558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899788429","doi":"10.18352/lq.10252","title":"A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Health and Medical Research Fund; National Health and Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Medical Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Scopus; Publication; Open access journal; Compliance (psychology); Free access; Citation; Open science; Open data; Political science; Impact factor; Library science; Psychology; MEDLINE; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.4799997742312179,"score_gpt":0.5410362984218704,"score_spread":0.061036524190652475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899788429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621806,0.00019167172,0.0001746008,0.025328865,0.00068453833,0.00042477797,0.00009130818,0.0000037129653,0.010919892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723902,0.00008811561,0.00010886373,0.0004961682,0.00035758148,0.0000011867884,6.651843e-7,0.000023972294,0.02653325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854806,0.0047522523,0.0009752461,0.00031447096,0.0074952906,0.0009821249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98319966,0.0064443736,0.001965129,0.0007623917,0.006787959,0.0008404755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04346276,0.00017493818,0.00039455693,0.008302011,0.0019970953,0.021913506,0.012311755,0.000068428046,0.0001560649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015880533,0.00008629802,0.00011951281,0.034473844,0.0011064451,0.0067978897,0.0016102912,0.0011888586,0.000031338495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000285504,0.00012085334,0.3258027,0.000011202711,0.00016600042,0.000024539924,0.0049191467,0.00000911769,0.0021886085,0.00025018837,0.6552331,0.010989079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006629688,0.0010381961,0.9567356,0.00009900876,0.000016162045,0.000071433744,0.0019384905,0.000030807478,0.0011078458,0.0040011625,0.034176875,0.000121434394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029866642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036154613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030494248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001249012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899927427","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1330","title":"The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Peer review; Information retrieval; Scrutiny; Inclusion (mineral); Computer science; Technical peer review; Psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.7743918792844233,"score_gpt":0.7358830040339657,"score_spread":0.03850887525045765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899927427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038855378,0.8448905,0.0012451286,0.027778223,0.00066156057,0.004764939,0.00027090075,0.000017306222,0.081516065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3008852,0.68021387,0.013409195,0.0001371413,0.000150242,0.00014015805,0.0000041637554,0.000044306347,0.0050157537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.919664,0.033704843,0.0045126216,0.0013141105,0.03903083,0.0017735637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6658288,0.20864178,0.0030332147,0.011585344,0.10998036,0.00093044527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5225989,0.00020989713,0.0012123791,0.014807169,0.00029088784,0.0005684723,0.0050825765,0.00016301314,0.0019823827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5979723,0.00008581371,0.0008382134,0.19689378,0.002228286,0.00046620815,0.0017106617,0.0009561941,0.000015568981],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007561438,0.00028132476,0.008383948,0.0048804227,0.00010276051,0.00002279088,0.00034826854,0.000003130233,0.009546359,0.0007825237,0.23717085,0.738402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004444631,0.0028010767,0.26778242,0.054895885,0.00008694873,0.00020447493,0.001811576,0.00063591363,0.25514275,0.03960421,0.37585276,0.00073752046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036652084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013059389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73766446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001535608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002705858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900375034","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.12.006","title":"Response to Editorial commentary: predatory publishing or a lack of peer-review transparency?—a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in pediatric urology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Pediatric urology; Surgery; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5242213990346142,"score_gpt":0.5855189189213322,"score_spread":0.061297519886718055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900375034","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18516149,0.017433787,0.00025986118,0.026205087,0.7659789,0.0025420736,0.0021459388,0.0000058659202,0.00026704842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30457857,0.027661247,0.00038410444,0.002050406,0.66462344,0.00006153939,0.0001400023,0.00007734113,0.0004233794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97296,0.0044929297,0.0058381986,0.0012828383,0.014571444,0.000854613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.913907,0.059321843,0.00763846,0.0014396008,0.016807104,0.0008859886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1296086,0.00046318874,0.0040680887,0.1032428,0.00009370355,0.0033928442,0.019342277,0.0013645613,0.0004159842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24861142,0.00032864892,0.00050079817,0.14781514,0.00019927719,0.004690018,0.007147175,0.0024754934,0.000008309097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008733679,0.0005160871,0.16073495,0.000121888756,0.00048239488,0.00007385654,0.00023053934,0.000062685685,0.000008346236,9.645352e-7,0.82842755,0.00060704834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007703776,0.0058297087,0.09601172,0.000028131448,0.0031047831,0.000006309807,0.00012743988,0.00015032673,0.0000046697087,0.00031717482,0.8862274,0.0004885188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054721767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11941707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020555106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073895855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900535746","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006508","title":"Ten simple rules for collaboratively writing a multi-authored paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Vetenskapsrådet; Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4790088796465932,"score_gpt":0.5781260711431757,"score_spread":0.09911719149658249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900535746","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008927712,0.0017410498,0.14808355,0.0018600423,0.8001065,0.0026795578,0.03497429,0.00018679826,0.0014404802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014880395,0.000119075914,0.16181538,0.00042336114,0.8062877,0.0004823538,0.012540427,0.00011537762,0.0033359216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028546,0.0006032011,0.0013351147,0.0015757505,0.005374949,0.0008255015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90982056,0.06440366,0.00084719324,0.0004719764,0.02412421,0.0003324001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010657137,0.00036541847,0.00086422096,0.022328475,0.0005975361,0.0015892095,0.002579169,0.0010477456,0.00050507503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17602946,0.00026688792,0.00025791288,0.03637013,0.0005392939,0.00028938483,0.0008318079,0.000521111,0.0006344089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006890791,0.00017979092,0.0009092768,0.000017340404,0.000105411986,0.0000026622151,0.000057665766,0.000083073304,0.0001911301,0.0010214822,0.9892405,0.008122751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001067402,0.0005116664,0.0012911349,0.000015740674,0.00001830041,7.799938e-7,0.00009821787,0.036784217,0.00003265547,0.06880966,0.8910116,0.000358619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032963864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026714382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16537233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019951622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016636384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900654612","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.17.01569","title":"Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Directory; Citation; Library science; Publication; Web of science; Computer science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE; Political science; Advertising; Business; Law","score_opus":0.7911432833073164,"score_gpt":0.5825953285053198,"score_spread":0.20854795480199662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900654612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98864764,0.0031922758,0.00017483436,0.0035752147,0.0008455044,0.000055954868,0.0000030274139,0.00000304287,0.0035024988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972689,0.0010906815,0.00025028942,0.00014523913,0.00058246555,8.773508e-7,2.2856587e-7,0.000006650817,0.0006546472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862981,0.0008077019,0.001966252,0.00031263672,0.010023114,0.0005921858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177255,0.015571108,0.0009579862,0.00047827503,0.010507748,0.0007123551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24022816,0.000082611514,0.00060526456,0.13118392,0.0001999217,0.0037199927,0.00031573215,0.00012291045,0.00043939124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20574275,0.000053654283,0.00023793666,0.093055926,0.00038567558,0.002938198,0.00050890003,0.00090156915,0.00005613125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007328801,0.00011452168,0.55483073,0.000010634808,0.000008515408,0.00040334332,0.00022604821,8.1604196e-7,0.0007596033,0.00013832598,0.26454985,0.17888431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035384714,0.00022452112,0.88818306,0.000113888695,0.0000017187242,0.00027612926,0.0009141632,0.0002814027,0.00041463735,0.010658011,0.098475106,0.00010354686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006992118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000387724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3333523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008665252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069370284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900762555","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3279254","title":"Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Industrial organization; Electricity; Profit (economics); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Business; Economics; Marketing; Engineering; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.42654730451647505,"score_gpt":0.5061243563753214,"score_spread":0.07957705185884634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900762555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218305,0.0016812272,0.069700696,0.0028230154,0.0003491437,0.00011120873,8.910686e-7,0.000027694874,0.0034756444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996547,0.0010338086,0.000080714155,0.00013571333,0.000394536,0.0000026678586,3.3105024e-7,0.000007743922,0.0017975064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028236,0.00023716751,0.0005972176,0.00036300454,0.006207591,0.0023126514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945022,0.0009809773,0.00032036015,0.0005186246,0.003587044,0.00009081867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0798323,0.0001145187,0.00015417115,0.026303252,0.00089162897,0.0019778525,0.0027881372,0.00012278113,0.0002694856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032075588,0.000055769953,0.00009940797,0.18260668,0.00040781425,0.00053500285,0.00042737223,0.0021845712,0.00040573959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022745484,0.000053419673,0.065078564,4.0661857e-7,0.000032772736,0.000005433121,0.000040548643,0.0000038280114,0.0008985908,0.26831996,0.0013256083,0.6642181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035917055,0.000379891,0.12567101,0.0000074257932,0.000004599783,0.00037062116,0.00071959407,0.00070803554,0.0011138206,0.85961217,0.010914719,0.00013894618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015036592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012641003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066531193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012238804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901549057","doi":"10.1007/s12630-018-1254-4","title":"Focus on Peer Review: An Online Peer Review Course by Nature Masterclasses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Course (navigation); Peer review; Peer-to-peer; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.21409210013604407,"score_gpt":0.45468156684018585,"score_spread":0.24058946670414177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901549057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32754,0.1930107,0.000035418154,0.47206733,0.001958339,0.0006399836,0.00024431545,0.00001679696,0.004487117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8955978,0.03494942,0.0011030012,0.018379143,0.004884852,0.000007765085,0.0000916327,0.00019578314,0.044790607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756716,0.00096816424,0.0024378612,0.00077371974,0.01830606,0.001842605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303638,0.0011279726,0.0022746786,0.0014161416,0.055122364,0.0096950885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05243219,0.00057736563,0.0014415368,0.017738901,0.0010205043,0.0029493237,0.006045293,0.0004885008,0.003402782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049052887,0.00040096126,0.0006325687,0.036371455,0.0006427289,0.0016991689,0.000055726654,0.003094285,0.00027720322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034438406,0.000110192064,0.002505678,0.000060882427,0.000044506764,0.07682587,0.00009847738,0.0000023668945,0.000008778708,0.000120040415,0.88006365,0.040125106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038227666,0.002059816,0.0055153645,0.0016715594,0.00008947256,0.3714368,0.00023556325,0.000019154368,0.000029562581,0.0007565493,0.6174235,0.00038037638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027329715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014711026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010612571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008867739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901669045","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/vdu7j","title":"Science, technology and innovation policies in Latin-America: fifteen years of scientific output, impact and international collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Political science; State (computer science); Economic growth; Regional science; Economy; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.36098164767979657,"score_gpt":0.5699061880383827,"score_spread":0.2089245403585861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901669045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924605,0.000060305254,0.00047299656,0.0011408378,0.00024416376,0.00011804089,0.000019153773,0.0000094975485,0.005474544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629146,0.000021393082,0.0016368072,0.000032157648,0.000021841508,0.000001930743,0.0000019211714,0.000002456445,0.0019900338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963293,0.000029591287,0.00045485387,0.0004407709,0.0024940348,0.00025144237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941551,0.0003992194,0.00019851829,0.00027230618,0.0049034758,0.00007140066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007932347,0.00006212875,0.0001460353,0.26821104,0.00016500289,0.001628135,0.0007575816,0.000057576726,0.000095332296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020390697,0.00004596894,0.000011244567,0.54591537,0.0028879405,0.00086157495,0.0006109498,0.0000775036,0.000015930003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116577585,0.000046217054,0.671147,9.0396054e-7,0.0000034340433,5.3212295e-7,0.00046074056,0.0000053904155,0.021898042,0.024289846,0.0012413128,0.28089494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027821556,0.00025235064,0.96466213,0.00000448146,7.445105e-7,0.0000025564134,0.001244923,0.007973532,0.0029113232,0.013614915,0.008981146,0.00007368906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067784036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003836386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29351512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007411895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043380697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902067033","doi":"10.4033/iee.2018.11.10.c","title":"Eleven strategies for getting into graduate school in ecology &amp; evolutionary biology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Graduate students; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Biology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Political science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.35870779002070013,"score_gpt":0.5358896544351904,"score_spread":0.1771818644144903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902067033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862065,0.0006429695,0.008747733,0.0021496639,0.0010025603,0.00041500386,0.000012904204,0.00001962114,0.00080305367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948395,0.000085766136,0.0042901356,0.000175327,0.00019143242,0.00009962333,0.000011843738,0.000007334339,0.00029905126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644476,0.0005623399,0.0007828869,0.0007887964,0.0006235126,0.0007977157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941894,0.003938872,0.00021421206,0.0003182441,0.0011678576,0.00017145359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01335993,0.00015015034,0.0003619642,0.021944003,0.00038214496,0.00018942315,0.000700971,0.00040358395,0.000101818325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030683773,0.00012792456,0.00006132875,0.02293101,0.00074509805,0.00059943355,0.00041162965,0.0003517823,0.00023876702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097163786,0.000088848814,0.9639008,0.0000060771154,0.000007254792,0.0000026328867,0.00012642653,0.00007783229,0.00054029044,0.025151307,0.0027112165,0.007290137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045190833,0.00025088328,0.55132693,0.0000033296253,0.0000017175399,0.0000075184344,0.0003530115,0.0045679873,0.000006668597,0.4414738,0.0014708921,0.000085343665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006377898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011175973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4163225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046756558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057339243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902198450","doi":"","title":"Mapping and Analyzing the Co-authorship and Thematic Networks of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences in the Science Citation Database from 2011-2016","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kurdistan University Of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Citation; Thematic map; Library science; Co-citation; Computer science; Citation database; Data science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Geography; Scopus; Political science; MEDLINE; Cartography","score_opus":0.4589085655805586,"score_gpt":0.48107154405116936,"score_spread":0.022162978470610772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902198450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761893,0.00045372878,0.020109082,0.0019657935,0.000051695875,0.00014627408,0.00002978201,0.0000027137148,0.0010515907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790865,0.0003312573,0.0016681346,0.00001659229,0.000017029246,2.9917146e-8,0.000001448277,0.0000012883637,0.000055543933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477583,0.0003897658,0.00022594901,0.00040305333,0.0039734673,0.0002319199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928089,0.0056909113,0.00036213358,0.00040291646,0.0006001925,0.0001349951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029506717,0.00006874947,0.00022215606,0.008229871,0.0007356944,0.0001735789,0.0028171141,0.000072644085,0.00023896442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038509446,0.000045255634,0.000043256667,0.0398147,0.005747434,0.0006440472,0.0008619773,0.0001735387,0.0000046760974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021255187,0.00040684774,0.73415434,0.00008313185,0.00007018465,0.000052937943,0.05467849,0.00014475222,0.0050874846,0.023225266,0.0051316316,0.17675237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000642343,0.00018144252,0.78702044,0.0001348103,0.00001592504,0.0000032467785,0.07262777,0.12888111,0.00008986684,0.009982306,0.00030962226,0.000111144764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002317813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000832523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17664123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002655608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032456848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902765992","doi":"","title":"Approaches to assessing impacts in the humanities and social sciences: recommendations from the Canadian research community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7863326952114063,"score_gpt":0.5765925590146029,"score_spread":0.20974013619680332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902765992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91707903,0.00016981194,0.0000067434826,0.067739435,0.00015017515,0.00057522365,0.0004122926,0.0000038126411,0.013863457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960834,0.00035496865,0.0009861501,0.002097379,0.00038025013,0.000017405566,0.000006720778,0.000011934489,0.00006178334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878851,0.0019123674,0.00152481,0.0013786438,0.0028442743,0.004454796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97219473,0.02020668,0.00025332219,0.0011783183,0.0030294738,0.0031374684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15277669,0.00028036314,0.0006542009,0.015942184,0.008609432,0.012865783,0.0063300184,0.00020302,0.00015811108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054190487,0.00017921046,0.00009824254,0.025611985,0.040813554,0.0025175223,0.003260394,0.0019162977,0.000042596188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024654033,0.00014291293,0.06437218,0.00000826338,0.000006806864,8.80822e-7,0.0008001633,0.000007645137,0.00010067837,0.93019694,0.00053773116,0.0038011144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000547541,0.000811644,0.59991366,0.000049189766,0.0000070337933,0.0000143533725,0.026480077,0.009611619,0.00046818538,0.34987983,0.011899369,0.00031748324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27913362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21008678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58031714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013562511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011229727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904884511","doi":"10.1038/d41586-018-07695-1","title":"Citations strength begins at home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); China; Production (economics); Political science; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.395902740489628,"score_gpt":0.5826764081247703,"score_spread":0.1867736676351423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904884511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309992,0.0010715243,0.0003502065,0.0047133802,0.0017601368,0.0001241223,0.000106202715,0.00004300629,0.0608322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780796,0.000041275245,0.0012195987,0.0007051247,0.00034531605,0.0000032952632,0.00000730292,0.0000071266095,0.019591333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921893,0.000084232735,0.00026829663,0.0005181045,0.006520685,0.00041941775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99336255,0.002238389,0.00010112253,0.00069431146,0.0032945105,0.00030913623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050588152,0.0000948972,0.0001464136,0.029089909,0.00043511446,0.001020525,0.0017411556,0.00064094143,0.0034344958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02441595,0.00006182773,0.00009767231,0.15676647,0.00021700039,0.00033261883,0.0005526742,0.0010320903,0.0034969398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001620324,0.00008649756,0.079421595,0.0000013547955,0.000011978713,0.0000097798375,0.00020119033,0.0000016711247,0.0010034558,0.008797758,0.8320983,0.07835021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025007318,0.00012044789,0.3335209,0.0000023767575,0.0000024998544,0.000005275662,0.00011993742,0.00081912737,0.0013054558,0.012640635,0.65108776,0.00012549182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009636386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008742301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2540993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010850837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010142654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905552054","doi":"10.1101/495465","title":"The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Behavioral ecology; Psychology; Ecology; Disadvantaged; Behavioural sciences; Gender bias; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Biology; Political science; Alternative medicine; Psychotherapist; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.4319061493960599,"score_gpt":0.4821322954224687,"score_spread":0.05022614602640879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905552054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509764,0.033061054,0.005458562,0.0014771667,0.0040759197,0.0043436796,0.00039688905,0.00011074068,0.00009963699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97640586,0.014400331,0.0066250875,0.0003256572,0.0012121465,0.0008096633,2.1165056e-7,0.00009159893,0.0001294344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922189,0.00039514282,0.0014387905,0.001917466,0.0029834278,0.0010462804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98503506,0.0037587718,0.0010382588,0.0031473918,0.006219656,0.00080084766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04338789,0.00050703844,0.00081402727,0.013080445,0.0013175188,0.008546802,0.0032767449,0.00053665997,0.000039883635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027164105,0.00031411002,0.00033110063,0.040649466,0.0005963353,0.00034109742,0.002929552,0.0007592001,0.00022099105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005345104,0.0018613916,0.061908253,0.0027646562,0.0015155133,0.0034819571,0.00018770514,0.000052068743,0.13749537,0.02282513,0.7470596,0.015503249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034648208,0.00018511311,0.007408787,0.0001742985,0.00007468021,3.676377e-7,0.000013503988,0.0030027488,0.013540445,0.00014478211,0.97094554,0.0010449045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038433198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013265558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22388594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019926064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068690546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908106500","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.005","title":"Comparing journal and paper level classifications of science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; Robustness (evolution); Discipline; Data science; Data mining; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.7615079244057587,"score_gpt":0.5814149810599263,"score_spread":0.18009294334583237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908106500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742826,0.0009921509,0.006927924,0.0003412193,0.0010780166,0.00008019164,0.000005367358,0.0000018178048,0.01314503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908,0.0008836331,0.007609293,0.00006906245,0.000064093445,1.5869284e-7,1.0208281e-7,0.0000042267143,0.0005694132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866026,0.00005301276,0.0016999821,0.00017411028,0.011073798,0.00039648317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98019916,0.003468207,0.0019464537,0.00040033722,0.013415924,0.0005698986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04101369,0.00009900937,0.00042341824,0.11096243,0.0002802733,0.0019241725,0.0026072976,0.00007132521,0.00021524915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06266278,0.000060961127,0.0001600715,0.19337851,0.0005928454,0.0033660943,0.00047166809,0.0005731593,0.000049581813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052734624,0.00014257598,0.8050559,0.000013781682,0.000033738,0.0000067581223,0.0004309151,0.00026437247,0.012543892,0.00492798,0.005962202,0.17056514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009957056,0.0006346954,0.9617082,0.000032298813,0.0000119226825,0.00045492034,0.0022447843,0.004562397,0.001810222,0.0033781056,0.024030086,0.00013669241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006436821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010642685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17042845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001693561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011633858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909165781","doi":"","title":"Public Funding of Research and Grant Proposals in the Social Sciences: Empirical Evidence from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public funding; Volatility (finance); Political science; Public economics; Research council; Economics; Social research; Public policy; Empirical evidence; Public administration; Social science; Financial economics; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8755535253053849,"score_gpt":0.6190290908832738,"score_spread":0.25652443442211104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909165781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95675826,0.0010921103,0.000006379941,0.027971614,0.0003306651,0.0012037138,0.00017698771,0.000007669817,0.012452619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388474,0.0051061846,0.00032310464,0.00014455036,0.00022411667,0.00012710107,0.000008338823,0.00002129916,0.00016057686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96966076,0.005318344,0.0021786788,0.0029809722,0.017443955,0.002417307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391225,0.055644657,0.00043006393,0.0014593989,0.0028114347,0.000531971],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14052235,0.00030282314,0.0009579418,0.035606924,0.0009976546,0.0047780722,0.009887848,0.00044447507,0.00013746948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14062698,0.0002085758,0.0001510679,0.075267725,0.0036745793,0.0005264998,0.009253986,0.004452379,0.000008349211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013891088,0.00028498174,0.8162754,0.00012525379,0.000038959803,0.00018342394,0.0034722327,0.000187934,0.0002713449,0.0011584335,0.004877011,0.17298608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010038245,0.0007485397,0.7899752,0.0005995122,0.0000058668566,0.000013248659,0.030561596,0.03898648,0.00030203917,0.12050382,0.016451191,0.0008486557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19237621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29363284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17213742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018250076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013721662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909330166","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-102258-0.00005-7","title":"Open Collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Agency (philosophy); Scholarship; Publishing; Open access publishing; Library science; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.478002575616169,"score_gpt":0.547529362609281,"score_spread":0.06952678699311199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909330166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000086659755,0.0007222543,0.000025946494,0.00035973915,0.0013002219,0.0010120253,0.00013992524,0.000027057024,0.99632615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00053755473,0.00011947791,0.0008066959,0.00043805398,0.000537695,0.00002656882,0.0000181422,0.000051359893,0.9974645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870744,0.000118099,0.0011103239,0.0013656602,0.009809821,0.0005217425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884173,0.0014265481,0.0007285804,0.0019791177,0.0069488618,0.00049956905],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018216163,0.0003554817,0.00072590186,0.035568595,0.0003779524,0.0106064975,0.008327366,0.00048572573,0.014921586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007303059,0.00025621903,0.00022108397,0.012190923,0.0003755084,0.00045327577,0.004290386,0.00045801722,0.013914826],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014058665,0.000008023677,0.000023738923,0.0000032906473,0.000022917771,0.000015352809,0.00009297667,1.12068676e-7,0.0000115218445,0.0075795846,0.07376837,0.9184601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019986035,0.00014126828,0.000053324373,0.0000346427,0.000011463814,0.000004224497,0.000027891678,0.000030708885,0.00004693006,0.17037076,0.828803,0.00027590294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001364674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077028744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91818416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022129154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009505297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910378291","doi":"10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-17-00007","title":"The Journal Impact Factor of Orthopaedic Journals Does not Predict Individual Paper Citation Rate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAAOS Global Research and Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Subspecialty; Web of science; Scopus; Medicine; Citation analysis; MEDLINE; Computer science; Library science; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Political science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.7932535306562258,"score_gpt":0.67051882888837,"score_spread":0.12273470176785584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910378291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931772,0.059003882,0.00024312969,0.00460766,0.0006347557,0.0008924901,0.0003404559,0.0000047201015,0.002500883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159269,0.1826059,0.000098497796,0.000047285168,0.00025545512,0.000008687127,0.0000011553982,0.000005566237,0.0010505286],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818374,0.0031516212,0.0015107492,0.0004483606,0.011959296,0.0010925698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817568,0.007841707,0.0012474398,0.0012255122,0.006765074,0.001163489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17093995,0.00018200718,0.0005488708,0.0070156255,0.0033200842,0.011164503,0.004533874,0.00013351931,0.0006141703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22490044,0.00006545925,0.0003394012,0.02286027,0.0011380228,0.0015284688,0.0013216549,0.0009011029,0.00011966965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013219516,0.00005151352,0.24574228,0.0000141860855,0.00003955192,0.000010013921,0.000061050094,3.9506557e-7,0.00076493307,0.00016280505,0.029091936,0.72392917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004981845,0.0005523481,0.90076125,0.00009178497,0.0000079930005,0.000027485916,0.00020294663,0.00009731265,0.00015565233,0.016039362,0.08147261,0.00009304817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014796764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014579663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7238361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001402049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071889954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910422483","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v13i2.4066","title":"An Examination of Bibliometrics in Calls for Major Canadian Research Awards","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Bibliometrics; CLARITY; Nomination; Multidisciplinary approach; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.537772614021961,"score_gpt":0.5752178515967156,"score_spread":0.0374452375747546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910422483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154994,0.0018538585,0.000056084893,0.033546492,0.00022586847,0.00087451946,0.00006490031,0.0000021101798,0.04787676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975314,0.0010162259,0.00033560087,0.0004224414,0.00006835586,0.000007750101,0.000008581502,0.000006629699,0.00060299714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100024,0.0021976202,0.00094373204,0.00019100757,0.004887743,0.00077966775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730206,0.01875061,0.00037333646,0.0003973679,0.005884368,0.0015737242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12084667,0.00008641049,0.00022838329,0.19779724,0.00066530885,0.0047421344,0.0014639833,0.00017903258,0.00021900507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054626934,0.00005495437,0.000046594654,0.15123385,0.0004553213,0.028041992,0.000110923866,0.0010309868,0.000027600421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006349681,0.0001333261,0.23994103,0.00022924076,0.00007055163,0.000049398343,0.0144651225,0.00022453378,0.00010690443,0.24532546,0.04165731,0.45716214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091621414,0.0012029897,0.35409218,0.000047695263,0.0000054231127,0.000068967,0.02338605,0.00399949,0.00034294554,0.0068855104,0.608925,0.00012758476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02224763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013885175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56726766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011862844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060474095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958736},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2911016227","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2018.0045","title":"Credit, Copyright, and the Circulation of Scientific Knowledge: The Royal Society in the Long Nineteenth Century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Royal Society","keywords":"Copying; Legislation; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Law; Reuse; Originality; Balance sheet; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Finance; Creativity; Engineering","score_opus":0.22897284567623058,"score_gpt":0.49410980942515753,"score_spread":0.2651369637489269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911016227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17086937,0.78253824,0.0013587917,0.019591732,0.0053890552,0.0038198016,0.000067563284,0.000029043871,0.016336443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779001,0.020691684,0.000047323163,0.00052812777,0.00050453027,0.000038371898,0.000004134693,0.0000068808868,0.00027884555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912903,0.0015373436,0.0010002194,0.0005937095,0.0051429193,0.00043556458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903255,0.0059366697,0.00041414943,0.0013719653,0.0017859943,0.00016574023],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057678223,0.00015909132,0.00046809838,0.0020440274,0.0010097544,0.0024478447,0.0028431842,0.000088858134,0.001057008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015530215,0.000055799785,0.00029813207,0.059581663,0.0035119923,0.00019798471,0.00053257454,0.00034477946,0.00018804597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000783324,0.00055954675,0.10262296,0.0008292809,0.00010010843,0.000007270732,0.015535639,0.000005380869,0.00009851107,0.020798279,0.57715666,0.28220806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049315573,0.000046174937,0.13422549,0.0002193555,0.000026121512,0.00000479832,0.0001991586,0.004797804,0.000012512181,0.00074741646,0.8591304,0.00009764173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032501866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035031473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80703074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048268095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028636117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911268485","doi":"","title":"Research Impact Responsibilities: Policy Alternatives for Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.2125347363266677,"score_gpt":0.47137206895294453,"score_spread":0.25883733262627684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911268485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026396576,0.00026439902,0.00035225134,0.07633645,0.00082076254,0.0018733952,0.004355627,0.00016708559,0.91319036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007249052,0.0006907163,0.00089577655,0.00012970882,0.00044766802,0.0000026581688,0.000056690584,0.0002395883,0.99028814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854303,0.001270801,0.00037459598,0.0016208813,0.009766352,0.0015370871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786709,0.015391191,0.0005000951,0.0024919126,0.0017619088,0.001183978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045346767,0.00043125992,0.0007901511,0.122387365,0.00039467175,0.0017256466,0.0062857443,0.00048028587,0.0060059815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014925894,0.0003492285,0.00041968358,0.1163279,0.0004743878,0.0011759641,0.0024492084,0.0008712317,0.0004761736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018549505,0.0000497834,0.004789057,0.00003420185,0.00008722529,0.0000692829,0.00008007317,0.000013258313,9.1208074e-7,0.0046397997,0.98870057,0.0013503191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056008913,0.00029250962,0.0032341785,0.000058500602,0.000006316292,2.6636374e-7,0.0022217187,0.000029664618,0.000071284594,0.0016683949,0.9914643,0.00039278067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9151723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08879249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014503573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017187748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999896},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2911600539","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501073","title":"Peer review, bibliometrics and altmetrics ‐ Do we need them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bibliometrics; Citation; Science Citation Index; Computer science; Impact factor; Proxy (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Social media; Data science; Toolbox; Data mining; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.2820165169104853,"score_gpt":0.4876526026311676,"score_spread":0.20563608572068232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911600539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5581638,0.0045300024,0.0007363784,0.36073324,0.0015910076,0.003012206,0.00016606432,0.00019221498,0.070875056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889711,0.0067793056,0.0017004773,0.0007872584,0.000035979243,0.000033289554,9.00774e-7,0.000004673861,0.0016870138],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873976,0.000008478667,0.0008023398,0.000321856,0.011006906,0.0004628012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91113234,0.0014810675,0.0018440691,0.00030969683,0.08505588,0.00017694743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054493397,0.00011219452,0.00027458163,0.10012245,0.0006308879,0.0019620855,0.0022462853,0.00019104233,0.000012718832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36318597,0.00006763353,0.00005593106,0.4804925,0.00084067136,0.0042193476,0.0011231335,0.00018819123,0.000033865235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011083031,0.000036678925,0.25533092,0.000103932856,0.00002002996,1.4350629e-8,0.00047804843,1.0054887e-7,0.0014136187,0.12219577,0.22095151,0.3994583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048781314,0.0002114794,0.022469299,0.00005252361,0.000021383867,0.000008944978,0.0015051829,0.0011078948,0.01026737,0.06087028,0.9028373,0.00016055732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043261175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5166107e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6818858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019881582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018675938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999074},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2911656051","doi":"10.17705/1atrr.00032","title":"Does “Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars Journal Basket…” Support the Basket with Bibliometric Measures?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Sample (material); Context (archaeology); Centrality; Quality (philosophy); Relevance (law); Set (abstract data type); Association (psychology); Psychology; Computer science; Library science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; History; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6178053222731595,"score_gpt":0.6168308394371105,"score_spread":0.000974482836049062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911656051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20043162,0.00046238228,0.71530384,0.06792685,0.0022313024,0.005668336,0.00023029199,0.00007721193,0.0076681543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425864,0.000934696,0.0008469993,0.00032322496,0.0003429207,0.0003150707,0.000004657243,0.000016544296,0.002957222],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97090656,0.004780068,0.0017044434,0.00065556075,0.02102904,0.0009243258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90223503,0.04047454,0.0016816497,0.002056572,0.05293114,0.00062105805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33035386,0.00018355255,0.00034762017,0.12102666,0.0064342036,0.01749441,0.0021436617,0.00019275937,0.00016483488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1035683,0.000071051254,0.0002089381,0.30137724,0.00071541686,0.0027733478,0.00005711756,0.0017785729,0.00014606638],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017008766,0.00022003068,0.021188987,0.00003130043,0.00025412414,9.252168e-7,0.0014689596,0.00039799436,0.00039741266,0.003498795,0.018967979,0.9518726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010431127,0.004137761,0.3707606,0.000098408666,0.00013934654,0.0003577041,0.012291922,0.038380153,0.0022799266,0.012340428,0.54813695,0.00064567715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015546817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040837433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95122695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006224721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095574145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912977760","doi":"10.1177/0739456x19827083","title":"Why Do Some Articles in Planning Journals Get Cited More than Others?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.6307634190323469,"score_gpt":0.6496542888280322,"score_spread":0.018890869795685328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912977760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97950697,0.01180939,0.00007005818,0.0065175095,0.0006587621,0.0001470653,0.0000024110116,0.000003336787,0.0012845041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707216,0.00031336534,0.00041576521,0.00035909607,0.0002942671,0.0000022206793,6.064266e-7,0.000010533045,0.0015320113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901531,0.00065536285,0.0008886926,0.00032152602,0.007406058,0.0005752827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910356,0.004166549,0.00043397205,0.00031920444,0.0035178047,0.00052687974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03996065,0.000106199564,0.00032178473,0.06435278,0.00021068749,0.0028389678,0.0011783362,0.00012098622,0.0004640015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015893413,0.00006892717,0.000086796084,0.04598757,0.00014273591,0.0011712415,0.00022592884,0.0011098597,0.000057793808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009306979,0.00024733032,0.9090238,0.00001268365,0.000015747391,0.000036354937,0.007098434,0.00039178008,0.0033201263,0.00014820379,0.053364925,0.02624753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078434707,0.0003299885,0.9096464,0.00041310146,0.0000027089561,0.00015655936,0.03617391,0.0018315532,0.0004683115,0.01034708,0.039705355,0.00014067482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064370484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014681153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029075477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013893831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007364258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913313145","doi":"","title":"Les déterminants de la capacité d'absorption des connaissances : le cas des courtiers de connaissances œuvrant dans le domaine de la santé au Canada","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07369701540744901,"score_gpt":0.37428537885994617,"score_spread":0.3005883634524972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913313145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343683,0.0074844863,0.009452945,0.0010101406,0.0011272368,0.00032597966,0.00038059143,0.00008658751,0.045763735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97659516,0.007993891,0.0023293472,0.000063141924,0.00020671212,0.0000028907393,0.000013731557,0.00005630801,0.012738837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097115,0.0019422639,0.0005770085,0.001227263,0.0030227718,0.0022595196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858666,0.0063843904,0.0005838213,0.00085416314,0.0017568956,0.0018340461],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010258865,0.0006532096,0.0008063317,0.00853093,0.0045245076,0.0011671062,0.0035059527,0.0007209979,0.00024417663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042172833,0.0006910592,0.00040206703,0.02505197,0.00904198,0.001678715,0.00087769824,0.0014285152,0.0000150296055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041667811,0.00047828018,0.5592074,0.00014445058,0.00022069806,0.005225932,0.02468729,0.0005029238,0.15592812,0.042506617,0.0038813315,0.2068003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003704998,0.0004051097,0.70577693,0.00027149258,0.00024122797,0.0016599096,0.06326223,0.004195805,0.1004331,0.009333532,0.109540045,0.0011755975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92845637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90006566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2056247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006243869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014276403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913618511","doi":"10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501020","title":"How authors cite references? A study of characteristics of in‐text citations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverb; Adjective; Verb; Noun; Citation; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information retrieval; Psychology; History; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.22828788400427727,"score_gpt":0.47108577355034753,"score_spread":0.24279788954607026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913618511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99567384,0.0000045565002,0.000062676,0.0018502424,0.00014505815,0.0004273474,0.000023929273,0.000007247703,0.0018050787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948794,0.000011831358,0.00030081315,0.000012487193,0.0000064195156,0.000018682395,3.33906e-7,0.0000012581106,0.00016026713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531037,0.000008702173,0.0007597089,0.00016907476,0.003534058,0.00021811166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97528034,0.0005147518,0.0020009088,0.00015407571,0.022010073,0.000039867435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015779844,0.000058368907,0.0002269592,0.026402213,0.00021619661,0.00042100032,0.0014660157,0.00010528291,0.0000022020213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10861456,0.000038106467,0.000028903416,0.10849062,0.0005705201,0.0024652064,0.00041241373,0.00010219464,0.000001370624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011329164,0.00007682212,0.92426646,0.000013168441,0.000006044074,2.9963139e-9,0.0021905662,2.1321661e-7,0.0037448048,0.03462948,0.00031120895,0.03474989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058271,0.00065368216,0.940676,0.000016585604,0.000008044833,4.970271e-7,0.01841592,0.0015767881,0.016021173,0.019617911,0.0023592454,0.00007144758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014011147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008601566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09283471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009649972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015617054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913685823","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0211963","title":"Measuring national capability over big science’s multidisciplinarity: A case study of nuclear fusion research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Tokamak; Big data; Nuclear fusion; Science policy; Multidisciplinary approach; Computer science; Data science; Political science; Nuclear physics; Physics; Plasma; Data mining; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.8747569257144527,"score_gpt":0.5857780844606228,"score_spread":0.2889788412538299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913685823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99389374,0.00003992384,0.0000031965772,0.00016514912,0.00014550083,0.0010321647,0.000017769,0.000018560448,0.004684015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900395,0.000008067638,0.00046684075,0.000009817023,0.00006037147,0.00001332391,3.7981184e-7,0.000011604949,0.0004256189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95487386,0.00061387214,0.0007866336,0.0011981556,0.04179513,0.0007323511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766154,0.0044885855,0.00020473375,0.0012677009,0.016990237,0.0004333341],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09123318,0.00012572101,0.00039795972,0.05418193,0.0008780134,0.0012519759,0.0024619403,0.00008776282,0.0008083763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05954802,0.00009335519,0.000078901874,0.17674874,0.000669327,0.0007540572,0.0032203358,0.00056689273,0.0004786533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090406895,0.014692358,0.85141677,0.00004034164,0.000042745713,0.00009785819,0.003890874,0.000038151626,0.12194561,0.0002798047,0.00016791376,0.007297187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028079948,0.0023392057,0.8911698,0.0000756771,0.00001805817,0.000039381684,0.030038187,0.059756454,0.008553039,0.0046877204,0.00013138981,0.0003831067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017579874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027490922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122566804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004686092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007318161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914500730","doi":"10.1186/s12916-019-1249-1","title":"The democratization of scientific publishing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sinai Health System; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Medicine; Commercialization; Democratization; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Scientific publishing; Internet privacy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.8908608467028656,"score_gpt":0.6634190669584947,"score_spread":0.22744177974437085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914500730","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007286477,0.9828212,0.0022976997,0.00033131678,0.004120136,0.00069428945,0.000022317829,0.000010595803,0.009695154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000039749375,0.97713363,0.00016322207,0.000015441725,0.00033007585,0.000014867209,0.000048053036,0.000016771,0.022238165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97892565,0.000918604,0.0021998582,0.0009659017,0.016461352,0.0005286106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452643,0.043478385,0.002044914,0.0027350872,0.0061488207,0.00032853632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09628197,0.0002336268,0.0015095943,0.05464131,0.0004850012,0.005822686,0.006588008,0.00025661767,0.00037540376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3291119,0.000092568895,0.00035906967,0.26853114,0.0008175281,0.0007455358,0.0009267709,0.00050213386,0.00044683937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011538259,0.000009955258,0.00015375388,0.00075272523,0.000010358995,5.268008e-7,0.000017932845,9.413204e-7,3.4529944e-7,0.0014968314,0.107817866,0.8897376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013316645,0.000056011915,0.00008181289,0.0016352214,0.000064726344,0.0000050373874,0.000085689746,0.0003479559,6.579075e-7,0.0016674326,0.995826,0.00009626367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002352988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025679024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88964134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010940763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017092802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916307675","doi":"10.5334/kula.42","title":"Joining Voices: University – Industry Partnerships in the Humanities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Negotiation; Public relations; Work (physics); Engaged scholarship; Reading (process); Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.7330843264663779,"score_gpt":0.583554223708977,"score_spread":0.14953010275740086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916307675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85053647,0.0021121153,0.00015011239,0.0032311054,0.00018218595,0.0003582987,0.000006970994,0.000022698301,0.14340003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88409704,0.000337902,0.00003800622,0.00010210938,0.00003881375,0.000009125652,0.00001369881,0.0000039693678,0.11535935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965897,0.0006867762,0.00039027428,0.00038766477,0.0017325208,0.0002130562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752564,0.009736093,0.00021030259,0.00032854677,0.0021535691,0.000045875742],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012336702,0.000115611605,0.0002073751,0.0077436976,0.00045496965,0.0010580097,0.0006379543,0.00012581621,0.00019890213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015126968,0.0000776542,0.00004435997,0.024802342,0.0001718508,0.0010823879,0.00026486418,0.0002742403,0.00009539967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029049124,0.00011911245,0.84030885,0.000042112635,0.000026920183,0.0000017607952,0.051470116,0.000025291696,0.00010392319,0.0522788,0.030657649,0.024936432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030429134,0.000036846104,0.52983254,0.000046985006,0.0000072045505,0.0000010702202,0.07443604,0.0037323139,0.00006915356,0.0023759922,0.38904086,0.0001167241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016539365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020776436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3583832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084433945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059134898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916932281","doi":"10.5334/kula.47","title":"Networking Social Scholarship…Again","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Professional association; Science communication; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; History; Law; Science education; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6254603893258378,"score_gpt":0.6320421837582847,"score_spread":0.006581794432446886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916932281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87104535,0.008228668,0.0010216455,0.0032994663,0.0011288115,0.0005395327,0.000009537852,0.00007728205,0.11464973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.908785,0.0006773571,0.0001329332,0.000064540145,0.00029626375,0.0000357396,0.00002715389,0.000011152022,0.08996988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954029,0.0003978416,0.00065718376,0.00061719184,0.002603791,0.000321122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892176,0.005056832,0.00030765784,0.00030993455,0.0049797916,0.00012818415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011579525,0.00016850713,0.0003306107,0.008315821,0.0006358099,0.0014557114,0.00054776773,0.00012454005,0.00028293685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01723372,0.00013183552,0.00008695765,0.030233216,0.00012993054,0.0013223054,0.00047918697,0.00018765457,0.00036401514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038377184,0.00011704096,0.592592,0.000047259568,0.000066115244,5.818108e-7,0.013208913,0.000020273177,0.0012947005,0.0125624295,0.046323434,0.33372888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044961236,0.000045648,0.6897061,0.000047571397,0.000012699747,0.0000012195737,0.0034599653,0.00679821,0.0004535126,0.013755918,0.2850423,0.00022729453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003368271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016285165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3335016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011081858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005101012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917178759","doi":"10.7554/elife.42254","title":"How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Public relations; Subject (documents); Citation; Public service; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Business; Politics; Computer science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.46894525042798846,"score_gpt":0.5173974203884864,"score_spread":0.04845216996049789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917178759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94423527,0.0073572216,0.000059291295,0.04692343,0.00022881263,0.00076521153,0.000025246589,0.000007496089,0.00039801546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933351,0.0036449865,0.00011576523,0.00020684095,0.000015535032,0.000014852384,0.0000038498915,0.000004202005,0.0026588126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937624,0.00025652742,0.0003914079,0.0004041187,0.0048901257,0.0002954278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965949,0.0010460971,0.00028558823,0.0005937528,0.0013234864,0.00015615179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012555756,0.00008785543,0.00026717904,0.00774884,0.000082047045,0.0008282085,0.0007607142,0.00005475452,0.0001311362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022218939,0.000038297418,0.00006439793,0.08488594,0.00009797425,0.00043197072,0.00039970828,0.00020086185,0.00010682121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064687188,0.0001245955,0.9044247,0.000035237266,0.000007576778,0.0000041882686,0.000066472996,0.0000020303662,0.000478007,0.00031087484,0.05777368,0.036766153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038154895,0.000116031704,0.8595841,0.000249683,0.0000048407496,0.000003073404,0.00077360735,0.00023388855,0.00037604038,0.0007264465,0.13742128,0.00012949767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113176375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000075223174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07964759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003227398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006511604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98601735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917432326","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2018-0125","title":"Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Citation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3639709923264734,"score_gpt":0.5913081892117475,"score_spread":0.22733719688527415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917432326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962219,0.0006447208,0.032596454,0.0023794216,0.0006117903,0.00037405564,0.000031856143,0.0000010563772,0.0011416577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982113,0.00011990203,0.0010170279,0.00001865916,0.00005367206,0.0000031658276,5.973493e-7,0.0000037182465,0.00057192385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965483,0.000109350636,0.00070221437,0.00011422386,0.002405149,0.000120771016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398167,0.0058913305,0.00094954483,0.00016641691,0.008943749,0.00006727316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007433784,0.000050754374,0.00019323124,0.012451723,0.000056834342,0.00022038884,0.00073420873,0.000029120933,0.000332907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095245475,0.000028216991,0.00019986721,0.020628227,0.000037045065,0.0006669422,0.000057437894,0.00009326709,0.000015116995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030427394,0.00061708986,0.85209125,0.000072025185,0.0002826991,0.0000013740872,0.012602901,0.00041149225,0.015429454,0.0509402,0.013343714,0.05390355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024749786,0.0016554361,0.87148976,0.0000521454,0.00006353601,0.000011459366,0.036870882,0.0024145287,0.015584666,0.067827746,0.0014479224,0.00010693085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007640768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019096346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05379662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092637565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019448389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917900233","doi":"10.5683/sp2/vmmbnh","title":"Predatory Health Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.684764535541735,"score_gpt":0.6343899949904206,"score_spread":0.050374540551314406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917900233","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000071777017,0.003572533,0.00007862449,0.0015797305,0.0009797572,0.0002859841,0.99223465,0.000020455653,0.0012411015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000004797524,0.0049967924,0.00017430913,0.0014335061,0.00109758,0.000013423127,0.99115497,0.000016821914,0.001107776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762085,0.00074553234,0.0015270419,0.0011414867,0.019329976,0.0010474661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870828,0.0026428178,0.0012904435,0.0030339758,0.004648632,0.0013013807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052498985,0.00031364974,0.0008244202,0.089991465,0.0004701753,0.0053773853,0.007356574,0.00044722384,0.00524868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057142064,0.00020843653,0.0003179778,0.11144132,0.00030713537,0.00043073224,0.0014748031,0.0007904881,0.0010153041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071360723,0.00007963098,0.000118073716,0.000013382638,0.00002070575,0.000020106148,0.000010845388,3.3242648e-7,3.5420163e-7,0.0000074584536,0.9810548,0.018667178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015596738,0.00023037595,0.0038056814,0.00003324017,0.0000052158125,0.000017363805,0.00002371935,0.000017261755,0.000003999493,0.0016354527,0.99385184,0.000219898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021027543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058052447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029565996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016851455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918023730","doi":"10.5334/kula.43","title":"The Initial Impact of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; General partnership; Observatory; Political science; Digital scholarship; Order (exchange); Public relations; Public administration; Business; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6711811087149504,"score_gpt":0.6776356465126533,"score_spread":0.006454537797702886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918023730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94891036,0.0032445244,0.000077774006,0.0030082054,0.0003947697,0.000824059,0.000022000242,0.000012001577,0.04350629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949435,0.000647263,0.00004505977,0.00003457952,0.0000874729,0.000044283253,0.000006553846,0.000007605382,0.049692214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958208,0.0006390074,0.00068313297,0.0003862528,0.0022227613,0.0002479993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823424,0.009666725,0.00051323604,0.00074505963,0.006624698,0.00010783383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01307975,0.00014033516,0.0002692998,0.00343655,0.0008125322,0.0018194683,0.0019987917,0.0000791393,0.00011049835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05766347,0.00006663659,0.00014141948,0.033410862,0.0002980295,0.0013408627,0.0017139161,0.00016668241,0.000047328464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000525049,0.00007661989,0.84299344,0.000016542963,0.00007557642,6.143668e-8,0.0035981797,0.00002917774,0.0007203438,0.027042773,0.013536229,0.11185858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003192871,0.000072287614,0.9561678,0.000039556868,0.0000074535255,7.0003887e-7,0.0010901988,0.002145154,0.0007473766,0.012780176,0.026543517,0.00008648506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008556313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090735724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113174394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017087391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034990473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291864439","doi":"10.1007/bf03022313","title":"Towards open access journals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.3929797568919386,"score_gpt":0.5192815606216892,"score_spread":0.12630180372975058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291864439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95795584,0.0046438766,0.0014795727,0.01688298,0.0018979127,0.00033730638,0.000013368481,0.0000072947437,0.016781844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940322,0.00026626154,0.0013961312,0.00045021402,0.0014032974,0.000001256192,0.0000012855207,0.000057380665,0.0023919428],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835567,0.000562901,0.0034494784,0.0006077132,0.009243046,0.0025801493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570927,0.0018409297,0.0030911176,0.0009346057,0.015113139,0.013310928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.105653696,0.00046214508,0.0012312854,0.07744333,0.0016016958,0.035593804,0.022583367,0.00037679652,0.0043810285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02777957,0.00033569138,0.00066869427,0.07246086,0.0004877006,0.007186002,0.00041058968,0.0020720626,0.00014842124],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015156362,0.000068115754,0.07688661,0.000005786663,0.00009491223,0.65139216,0.00063058495,0.00014718558,0.00004799756,0.0011049066,0.09595765,0.1735125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079705584,0.0005660653,0.12693511,0.00007621168,0.000030152583,0.7186969,0.0009857637,0.000026434032,0.0001947988,0.012765507,0.13854624,0.00037977457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019512212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030826623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17313273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019593104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019437721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919017259","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvcj2w0k.32","title":"Les grandes étapes du développement des sciences au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.6274794396192399,"score_gpt":0.5129783175131106,"score_spread":0.11450112210612928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919017259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10918299,0.002858762,0.000870919,0.0015466847,0.003552837,0.00076606136,0.0001921984,0.000032744832,0.8809968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6844717,0.00074280176,0.0014622204,0.0002733981,0.00035438393,0.000014099605,0.0000065171125,0.000050061262,0.3126248],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97798157,0.00026486866,0.0015557099,0.002065268,0.016125377,0.002007212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874281,0.006419524,0.000730105,0.0011343103,0.0032472813,0.0010406317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015953427,0.00084772985,0.0011180211,0.03403216,0.0037407975,0.0035463972,0.0055665285,0.0005162387,0.005156919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005561628,0.0006311761,0.0004625098,0.01491335,0.004692474,0.00033611196,0.0021070715,0.00080316595,0.0009398896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031262487,0.00004731752,0.09671731,0.00010586832,0.00011335372,0.00010888274,0.0003453045,0.00008775897,0.00012606746,0.26492268,0.0050739367,0.6323203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007393311,0.00066667504,0.053159982,0.00038428782,0.000060780483,0.00005434959,0.0005414145,0.0007169565,0.0009898171,0.03751058,0.9039381,0.0012377152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6827753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78477484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89886415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002904593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01536711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919425555","doi":"10.1111/caje.12579","title":"On the information contents of indirect citations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Index (typography); Computer science; Political science; Library science; Data mining; World Wide Web; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6994631789449368,"score_gpt":0.35727476157224536,"score_spread":0.34218841737269146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919425555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98922753,0.00007718297,0.00007324965,0.0047553536,0.0014162671,0.00020784907,0.00053290237,0.0000012624088,0.003708414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984977,0.000019826017,0.00006022385,0.00095395267,0.000058661226,0.000013929456,0.0000066388284,0.000008510841,0.00038050624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779266,0.00024215257,0.0012437762,0.00018364936,0.000057045036,0.00048071446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923642,0.0033204705,0.0012913371,0.0004928996,0.0014565944,0.0010744864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011182882,0.00011788397,0.00038059414,0.028306324,0.0005062891,0.000566348,0.0022990867,0.000053632484,0.0019488402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015697476,0.00009565765,0.00022697073,0.0114866635,0.00016259756,0.0007484085,0.00009269363,0.0004470892,0.00004209521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008401358,0.000028516124,0.027709883,0.0000052521827,0.000114748225,0.000029505905,0.0024589782,0.026587065,0.000016516571,0.88869226,0.028564943,0.025708321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011050315,0.0015317319,0.031329453,0.000022644263,0.000021143453,0.00024162239,0.009099465,0.0086797755,0.00028543398,0.76978725,0.17751479,0.00038164508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0343781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4953085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46093038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015197296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024775055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919782064","doi":"10.1038/s41467-019-08814-w","title":"Publisher Correction: Capturing variation impact on molecular interactions in the IMEx Consortium mutations data set","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Discovery Centre; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Variation (astronomy); Computational biology; Order (exchange); Data set; Library science; Information retrieval; Data science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.49417284895335195,"score_gpt":0.5928650619301072,"score_spread":0.09869221297675529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919782064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019276149,0.024513576,0.0027708805,0.07022795,0.17194122,0.004344984,0.0032876888,0.00020582606,0.72078025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099643,0.0011293646,0.000801952,0.0018105983,0.0004926756,0.00016069582,0.011330801,0.00006368071,0.074245915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882708,0.0021279065,0.0012020166,0.0012288541,0.006573553,0.00059684954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602939,0.018676255,0.0009925435,0.01613126,0.0036937748,0.00021224914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016486617,0.00040398058,0.0005437718,0.034034226,0.0007648491,0.0063401493,0.022703469,0.0008674944,0.0004177036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058827136,0.00025811564,0.0003127011,0.09447706,0.00024411936,0.001761915,0.0034931959,0.009460863,0.00062217464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198712,0.0002523453,0.0019845183,0.0000034242046,0.00006205796,0.0000048061224,0.00038809402,0.00036168078,0.000007725197,0.0011598477,0.9931391,0.0026272226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024328356,0.000052834905,0.0994139,0.000059195056,0.00005002626,0.000030288249,0.00089355547,0.032856815,0.0000011098505,0.0016992132,0.8643882,0.0003115422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001027081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002486212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061693374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001467093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920542261","doi":"10.5334/kula.16","title":"Historicizing the Knowledge Commons: Open Access, Technical Knowledge, and the Industrial Application of Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Open science; Relation (database); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge sharing; Open access publishing; Open access journal; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5934193188110289,"score_gpt":0.6279976310489943,"score_spread":0.03457831223796537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920542261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5659538,0.059520688,0.0034422346,0.013201204,0.0015066445,0.0060528913,0.00002966225,0.00008205948,0.35021085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881806,0.0011914751,0.0000722894,0.000025803469,0.000088608,0.00024323199,0.000009387531,0.000009412243,0.019541716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548995,0.0006219448,0.0009640976,0.0007202915,0.00191597,0.00028771316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728438,0.017587325,0.00073956547,0.0009357083,0.0077247964,0.00016876683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029056437,0.00018985354,0.00047601727,0.005739439,0.0013132812,0.002616013,0.0035386765,0.00011339694,0.000049327682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049540345,0.000100974845,0.00006636909,0.045000017,0.0024791437,0.0023774186,0.0047106207,0.00026657496,0.000035914254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025051212,0.00041953253,0.29540566,0.00008429327,0.00007125842,9.371668e-8,0.019635018,0.0000148475,0.0021477735,0.23528254,0.053020533,0.39366794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026225303,0.000106576605,0.5519305,0.00013695215,0.00006478155,0.000004252027,0.005866052,0.026243767,0.001354126,0.020988168,0.39036548,0.00031679586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007808282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002039805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41286433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019960698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033984298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920907292","doi":"","title":"","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.6577887895015732,"score_gpt":0.5416214260186945,"score_spread":0.1161673634828787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920907292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8306301,0.048696913,0.00079078425,0.06600132,0.023286318,0.004786221,0.00013161356,0.000063959706,0.02561274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73973686,0.0022709537,0.00038474213,0.0013065854,0.00047788952,0.0011361084,0.0000032990865,0.00003660159,0.25464696],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95016134,0.001696849,0.0024787122,0.003398244,0.035679396,0.0065854406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616768,0.020917093,0.0008131346,0.0036735754,0.008253585,0.004665836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12521692,0.00063190673,0.0012519961,0.17316587,0.00052758626,0.018550467,0.010983658,0.00073410606,0.0028479705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106968306,0.00051811215,0.0008605661,0.59872544,0.0009360284,0.006322276,0.004568859,0.0013476659,0.006853547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006863644,0.00041670474,0.42683172,0.000030588308,0.00004392841,0.00005119308,0.00010883208,0.00015164365,0.000024779718,0.0044339383,0.00620974,0.5616283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016166146,0.00014612451,0.66015714,0.000010990588,0.000014819559,0.00004263093,0.0005596004,0.0029476304,0.00047105527,0.010504013,0.32304332,0.00048605975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015166294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007939445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56114227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000994934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059101474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921399224","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.71602","title":"Rigorous policies ensure integrity of NLM literature databases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National library; Computer science; MEDLINE; Database; Medicine; World Wide Web; Data science; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2988147166144051,"score_gpt":0.4972170919798349,"score_spread":0.19840237536542976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921399224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005251481,0.0039969306,0.00012284947,0.9750124,0.005122304,0.00020427634,0.0032886702,0.000010628596,0.006990433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012335199,0.003900774,0.00037869316,0.93243885,0.019849896,0.0000058814917,0.00053542794,0.000060890015,0.030494414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632964,0.0013190715,0.0015769348,0.00061280414,0.031890307,0.0013044795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742037,0.010585838,0.0015287452,0.0007707619,0.011089634,0.0018213274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038050894,0.00031579615,0.0009233149,0.052093968,0.00034058915,0.003240299,0.004095172,0.0025030533,0.0073473463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22461109,0.00021520842,0.0005006911,0.06944897,0.00016132595,0.000582796,0.0002800718,0.012073264,0.000713589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002115493,0.0000148454665,0.03985114,0.000019870422,0.000072076604,0.0010826663,0.00014727851,6.277854e-7,0.0000010332616,0.00007356229,0.9416486,0.017086172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029534355,0.00005796506,0.012619725,0.00023795804,0.000014590749,0.00033115977,0.000108135624,0.000089720124,0.000005515312,0.00087807677,0.98513883,0.00022299287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008084722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008046133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1865602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015845858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010606386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921565448","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03066-3","title":"What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; National Cancer Institute; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; National Institutes of Health; Impact Fund; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; European Commission; National Research Centre; Nature","keywords":"Basic research; Public funding; Political science; Institution; Public domain; Public institution; Public relations; Public administration; Library science","score_opus":0.8248587450899906,"score_gpt":0.6784602035793619,"score_spread":0.1463985415106287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921565448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788005,0.0059650526,0.00094551546,0.0060846196,0.006460113,0.0007689867,0.00006892059,0.000054926993,0.0008513621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831362,0.00815594,0.002782578,0.00059531245,0.000411343,0.000017415903,0.000012538805,0.000027241162,0.0048614587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9524676,0.0023975002,0.0019470884,0.003001601,0.03823586,0.0019503055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.896863,0.087455474,0.0006376483,0.0031718812,0.008704609,0.003167387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18920518,0.0003118426,0.0008577723,0.18693626,0.000572421,0.01713773,0.005766135,0.00061724073,0.0027570107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26600295,0.00021740037,0.00031138648,0.5423129,0.0019528959,0.0037935795,0.0043972386,0.0018676395,0.0060082274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010832862,0.00039112847,0.6647955,0.0000126154955,0.000033531473,0.000051240226,0.00051523506,4.8900995e-7,0.0022932847,0.0004091629,0.024813857,0.3065756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013222301,0.0008867355,0.83853304,0.00016659494,0.000009933419,0.000012114549,0.0026974282,0.0028529086,0.0002023066,0.014578817,0.13831387,0.00042402637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026492868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044327102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35537666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031392026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007006329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922152001","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.015","title":"A cross-sectional description of open access publication costs, policies and impact in emergency medicine and critical care journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Scopus; Interquartile range; Purchasing power parity; Impact factor; Turkish; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Business; Political science; Finance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7233153791963524,"score_gpt":0.6748636395905908,"score_spread":0.048451739605761546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922152001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682568,0.015348908,0.0003175374,0.006705908,0.002150474,0.00026862658,0.000022582468,0.0000023677624,0.0069268486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095863,0.008006932,0.00006356852,0.000031264237,0.00035518006,0.000003269693,0.0000031070815,0.0000103776165,0.00056769134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070376,0.00037943208,0.0029445277,0.0004150748,0.0051345713,0.0004226263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838287,0.0015325489,0.0014937312,0.00037809176,0.0120903365,0.0006765513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02209679,0.000187106,0.0007479143,0.03263143,0.00013880995,0.00047132876,0.0025191724,0.00010230172,0.016323451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07384476,0.00010978641,0.000110959154,0.053268965,0.00041174478,0.0037185338,0.0007860601,0.00043292355,0.0000048370634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012513265,0.00006923231,0.97763675,0.00003265746,0.000024210116,0.0000027465737,0.0012128488,0.000010201619,0.0034780195,0.00047119678,0.012970796,0.003966195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010961547,0.0014261608,0.9847072,0.00010119556,0.000017239037,0.000053530253,0.004786564,0.00018488432,0.00003908757,0.0058233603,0.0016566033,0.000108057706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019611383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098331104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051747974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018953891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027194968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98457575},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2922325102","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.71703","title":"The authors respond to “Rigorous policies ensure integrity of NLM literature databases”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; National database; Database; Research integrity; Data science; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.2809331693544619,"score_gpt":0.5086315111524363,"score_spread":0.22769834179797444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922325102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063905404,0.0020705848,0.000115250885,0.98096424,0.005688938,0.00027634893,0.0018756401,0.000007344225,0.0026111074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069172825,0.0024436216,0.00034931875,0.8837712,0.016435277,0.000013379643,0.00021011817,0.00006730247,0.0897925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623484,0.0022172234,0.0016293455,0.00062703615,0.031644676,0.0015332915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610807,0.020607619,0.0012538674,0.0010265632,0.013479116,0.0025521554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07608673,0.00030194162,0.0007145405,0.040186815,0.0008109763,0.0053924886,0.0055500316,0.0019835944,0.0019367691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4016381,0.00017160135,0.00038136024,0.0991148,0.00016474848,0.0003831981,0.00040251928,0.011660537,0.00069268805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007978797,0.000007813556,0.012672365,0.0000073317956,0.00005902899,0.0005695594,0.0003148811,9.88891e-7,0.0000015424985,0.00012398591,0.9592972,0.02693735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019545534,0.000077422825,0.017585581,0.00016334374,0.000010321073,0.00016448727,0.00022145532,0.000056958874,0.0000044591966,0.0006790274,0.9806485,0.0001929515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005051518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014680783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32555136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017777145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011506908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922881746","doi":"10.17705/1cais.04413","title":"Looking Beyond the Pointing Finger: Ensuring the Success of the Scholarly Capital Model in the Contemporary Academic Environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Outreach; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Intellectual capital; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social capital; Political science; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; History; Law","score_opus":0.3236772749104296,"score_gpt":0.45239189693757875,"score_spread":0.12871462202714917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922881746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351658,0.002446393,0.00090655184,0.02465458,0.000805625,0.0041772462,0.00024295553,0.0000139682,0.031586852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888873,0.00011028795,0.0000550237,0.0002595698,0.00001701677,0.00010562866,0.000009151646,0.00000520027,0.0005493778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925643,0.0011748573,0.0015280097,0.00012845587,0.0043644328,0.00023993138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98157454,0.010589846,0.0029247527,0.003469191,0.0014161558,0.000025525072],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04734559,0.00010366074,0.00021877329,0.0019350402,0.0009819526,0.0013081586,0.012385278,0.00012999181,0.0000017110189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016727699,0.00004173581,0.00022989289,0.012729484,0.00016576806,0.0023293758,0.0021593575,0.00069410977,0.000024056033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014828388,0.00007525228,0.83891356,0.000045726298,0.00007956921,6.534447e-9,0.024283623,0.044569064,0.0004468892,0.08306905,0.005790223,0.0027121974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013193453,0.00004608604,0.48951676,0.00016951405,0.0000396971,0.0000032390053,0.04380585,0.38328218,0.0006892736,0.008719618,0.07214909,0.0002593174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019077328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013077661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028897598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019100204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925048720","doi":"10.1038/s41557-019-0236-7","title":"Charting a course for chemistry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Chemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.2802426624317443,"score_gpt":0.5757821151421088,"score_spread":0.29553945271036447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925048720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413674,0.0017983052,0.0002019007,0.001234054,0.00045809054,0.0002611184,0.00007756084,0.000047221856,0.054554336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584372,0.00001531048,0.00054485904,0.0002128405,0.00034747898,0.0000195466,0.000020591042,0.000016194517,0.04038598],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373454,0.000015234987,0.0004429646,0.00083512324,0.0043604434,0.00061170117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414665,0.0022174625,0.00024178719,0.0009258479,0.002136958,0.00033128692],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068482994,0.00016558907,0.00028731264,0.0012790324,0.00012913639,0.0009026767,0.002050469,0.0005881813,0.0035631505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021964261,0.00012443807,0.00022956457,0.031731766,0.000066699766,0.00020912998,0.00034581582,0.0008059848,0.0003379959],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005192423,0.00016077714,0.038541075,0.00013749523,0.0000295819,0.000007845088,0.00004056406,0.000015633605,0.8454526,0.000080485115,0.08722202,0.02826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010119177,0.000023505947,0.00415188,0.000022977714,0.000008564173,0.000018518642,0.00034414858,0.0041838977,0.70638436,0.002469578,0.28103775,0.00034287234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012935546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.3425489e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19381575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008296753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023818816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926567176","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026516","title":"Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa; Jewish General Hospital; Institut du Savoir Montfort; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Psychological intervention; Law; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.9177965981725121,"score_gpt":0.7046737378033378,"score_spread":0.21312286036917438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926567176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9533338,0.00063875946,0.00007307276,0.0006674282,0.0001485,0.0027432821,0.000065046195,0.000003218559,0.04232689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088687,0.00006337643,0.00034411607,0.000024513334,0.000015693358,0.000059405385,0.0000040249006,0.000007059421,0.008594934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061435,0.0019039304,0.00091433653,0.0005604162,0.0055573024,0.0004496672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776171,0.01597779,0.00039154492,0.001064246,0.0045432574,0.00040605292],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1739013,0.000077492215,0.00033123948,0.034169994,0.00008212571,0.008267575,0.004144824,0.00010526365,0.0009398088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24318022,0.000055549444,0.00003906314,0.11610564,0.000107557906,0.004209267,0.0038371051,0.0003892387,0.00011542516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006925716,0.0000938103,0.95025116,0.000011848314,0.000007349843,0.0000015518362,0.0003827097,0.000015746626,0.00017961464,0.00023514821,0.023349648,0.025402164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006909508,0.000056860732,0.98914194,0.00005437819,4.7174018e-7,0.0000013503974,0.0005031046,0.0028075823,0.000098839504,0.001610964,0.0049595283,0.00007401575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013052764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081935644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007752397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008272337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2927052045","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v14i1.4764","title":"Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.49515394773640964,"score_gpt":0.5635849346576557,"score_spread":0.06843098692124605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927052045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91509354,0.005948665,0.000004587576,0.039488416,0.00017760012,0.00036067865,0.0000111167265,0.0000014624507,0.03891394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95972604,0.03891219,0.000045308596,0.00056440686,0.000054563687,0.0000020712755,6.2641277e-7,0.0000033680394,0.00069144135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927843,0.0013879044,0.0009520792,0.00011138253,0.0043618088,0.0004025022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98457724,0.012170289,0.0006204181,0.00034218314,0.0017290722,0.00056080054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04963524,0.00007882779,0.00020576923,0.076146945,0.0004700686,0.004634749,0.0014045604,0.00008364795,0.00046234493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011772314,0.000032865235,0.000062446634,0.096823476,0.00053458137,0.020681743,0.00023926751,0.0009100303,0.00002076038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007681403,0.000071151306,0.8674404,0.0000518118,0.000090868045,0.000049362745,0.010298543,0.00011154713,0.000023757622,0.026473118,0.051008962,0.04361234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055183086,0.0005790186,0.6515591,0.00006427701,0.000007639953,0.00018671637,0.046384644,0.00023113027,0.00008483701,0.0032121723,0.2970665,0.00007212087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000697358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003684941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24605756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016274487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014517852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99655193},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2936735465","doi":"10.1111/jan.14010","title":"Increasing citations to your work","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Ulster University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Work (physics); MEDLINE; Psychology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.3840752540123307,"score_gpt":0.607925476350166,"score_spread":0.2238502223378353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936735465","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022284059,0.0023022802,0.0100137675,0.0012031974,0.96104854,0.00024452378,0.000047027104,0.000010138241,0.0028464624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020325523,0.0004681272,0.069555596,0.00009343132,0.9039754,0.000002846497,0.00001098415,0.000086988664,0.0054810587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97659177,0.00042834046,0.0018422893,0.0005986014,0.0198194,0.00071962446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95053947,0.028761076,0.0022916584,0.0008363733,0.016668439,0.000903002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02519817,0.00028396255,0.0009654481,0.08418502,0.00026291746,0.0028879398,0.003320904,0.00045926153,0.00010953311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29096317,0.00021031474,0.00045140533,0.13386928,0.000096708114,0.0011620173,0.00024032764,0.0017508476,0.0002927174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023982795,0.000071099086,0.00023814164,0.000004326704,0.00001658942,0.000019629057,0.0002333763,0.0014783407,0.00030248082,0.000008762412,0.74758893,0.24979849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006290095,0.0005045903,0.0018826757,0.0009505382,0.000030112049,0.000025207459,0.0013298867,0.00003352222,0.00006337453,0.0034085168,0.9908582,0.0002843987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052782657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.1262217e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26576498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010751026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013858669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936767620","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.012","title":"Predatory Journals and Junk Meetings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing; Praise; Theme (computing); Medical education; Public relations; Library science; Law; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1529461951327008,"score_gpt":0.4460579922514006,"score_spread":0.2931117971186998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936767620","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022585578,0.061856918,0.000027362134,0.0004232385,0.9129013,0.00016079393,0.00023846688,0.0000023726104,0.0018040155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44487876,0.06939814,0.0021603515,0.0013593682,0.44288865,0.000011873642,0.000038466835,0.0002719849,0.03899242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807795,0.00047869378,0.002243512,0.0006938582,0.015012316,0.0007920699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7890867,0.18250518,0.0052452027,0.00084150984,0.020587005,0.0017343757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024552803,0.00036706773,0.0014833664,0.03830648,0.00029324848,0.0022645046,0.0025077052,0.0011627318,0.00073217315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53591144,0.00025705766,0.00019690598,0.033572175,0.00023482984,0.0005247109,0.000937642,0.0027171287,0.000007418705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039892975,0.000028475928,0.019203242,0.000031262498,0.000086531734,0.0006993685,0.000025779209,0.000007731876,0.0000026518246,0.0000124354665,0.8864368,0.09346169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011607159,0.0004295911,0.035643965,0.000014778944,0.000051941035,0.000035330504,0.00019741889,0.00007277694,0.000004707512,0.0006957688,0.9614285,0.00026450912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007091307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00689256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5113586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015605446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012973044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937701261","doi":"10.1590/2318-0889201931e190031","title":"Por métricas alternativas mais relevantes para a América Latina","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Transinformação","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4570872874979073,"score_gpt":0.5328393504066783,"score_spread":0.07575206290877101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937701261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6096796,0.003189371,0.028115692,0.0068905354,0.0050524003,0.003364802,0.0006842329,0.0002893233,0.34273407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417969,0.0048207133,0.0010336547,0.00055273337,0.00012174777,0.000013513808,0.000023718978,0.00005179927,0.051585212],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037744,0.00026168674,0.002129225,0.0013419952,0.013761226,0.0021284267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884652,0.0049474193,0.0006977635,0.0019641202,0.0026903176,0.0012352148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011358759,0.00065257156,0.0011070903,0.051598936,0.00044217845,0.0038597793,0.0046038674,0.000444566,0.005636795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005511198,0.00048590824,0.00074050965,0.17310387,0.00030990393,0.0027052655,0.0006364529,0.0011112399,0.028074238],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039997927,0.00053922256,0.027587865,0.00015567352,0.00017715692,0.00015366837,0.00413537,0.0002525949,0.0010051526,0.0010950639,0.027282108,0.93721616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006867383,0.0029647455,0.10135649,0.00027680577,0.00011185213,0.00020390975,0.0061957403,0.22940196,0.0041192477,0.0013336118,0.6448747,0.0022935783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024289735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015795216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024605426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070595345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940242975","doi":"10.7554/elife.47338","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":358,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Impact factor; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Metric (unit); Political science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7993279418222892,"score_gpt":0.6616785678238986,"score_spread":0.1376493739983906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940242975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903785,0.0060827853,0.0000581195,0.0028444023,0.000169587,0.00035589235,0.000023824205,0.0000017715851,0.000085144595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903364,0.0085988045,0.00006498433,0.00015361459,0.000022828426,0.0000014536741,3.890222e-7,0.000003196212,0.00081829255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295497,0.0004540618,0.00054206734,0.0001733757,0.005670659,0.00020488104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954913,0.001785025,0.00028331476,0.00036327774,0.0019297904,0.00014726967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018084625,0.00006182021,0.00018447313,0.0095677,0.00007312406,0.00026143293,0.0007125978,0.0000633658,0.00080186274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052265264,0.000028241135,0.000077258745,0.061876006,0.00005704801,0.00056361116,0.00024476467,0.00042373248,0.00008109395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027549395,0.000021917938,0.95430595,0.000007848129,0.0000031534958,2.3793913e-7,0.00007966389,0.00003005594,0.0014734799,0.000011938123,0.016979596,0.027083402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013755451,0.00006378085,0.9935167,0.00011202377,0.0000029770986,0.000013886219,0.000022756112,0.0012180557,0.0002320096,0.00042344254,0.004218171,0.000038648544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024189716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056081067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052308306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006034862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028192418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95806426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941300175","doi":"10.29173/cjs28794","title":"Internationalization of Polish Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Transformative Role of The Research Evaluation System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Variance (accounting); Transformative learning; Political science; Sociology; Ranking (information retrieval); Social science; Library science; Business; Pedagogy; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.775705695234815,"score_gpt":0.6293326447951026,"score_spread":0.14637305043971238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941300175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863481,0.0014889925,0.000022290225,0.0046608904,0.00021816253,0.00023296848,0.00001545149,2.4501603e-7,0.0070129097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997677,0.000033699565,0.000006131783,0.00008934291,0.000065134234,0.000001802834,2.1749685e-7,0.0000017807815,0.000034146466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917336,0.0029464972,0.00067395443,0.0000932004,0.0043066535,0.00024610086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902963,0.0040867426,0.00059593865,0.00012692327,0.004843947,0.000050118975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09825837,0.000045549357,0.00018926506,0.0105979,0.00064254866,0.00032668785,0.002120388,0.00007292805,0.00013910355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074783135,0.0000195549,0.00007975627,0.015611665,0.0018582657,0.00030635082,0.000052799827,0.00040848515,0.0000027542474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003805241,0.000035855246,0.41825366,0.000025382365,0.00006492328,0.0000017946938,0.23633301,0.00076785794,0.0008626592,0.3262354,0.0028439825,0.01453738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042922964,0.00023921976,0.6392615,0.00006306629,0.000009815409,0.00004313522,0.23012722,0.0030382595,0.0001742688,0.12568033,0.0008902612,0.00004371857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003666881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006959518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22100782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002632636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020588802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942862229","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1817431116","title":"Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Reputation; Prestige; Meritocracy; Work (physics); Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Economic growth; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.22771113812672306,"score_gpt":0.4715653185338999,"score_spread":0.24385418040717682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942862229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893894,0.0008324123,0.0000015936325,0.0050876415,0.000048626433,0.00062830927,0.000005044832,0.0000023210653,0.004004654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983698,0.00027452453,0.00029547262,0.000068583,0.000033457618,0.000011675199,1.2028521e-8,0.0000021909188,0.0009442989],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885704,0.00004066985,0.00057010446,0.00045219695,0.010155685,0.00021095948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99378175,0.00445277,0.00090011116,0.00003140435,0.00077535125,0.000058642156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028682562,0.000089520785,0.00027328887,0.0050254036,0.00016031033,0.00011013236,0.003143232,0.00008408165,0.000024760344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03068206,0.00003857312,0.00009421309,0.029279638,0.0029911962,0.0007342549,0.0011163775,0.0002874195,0.000006479603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068235015,0.00010642001,0.3520761,0.00017252527,0.000022099017,4.7745248e-9,0.0004830134,0.000052218467,0.5122666,0.121951,0.0017039297,0.011097864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005651348,0.00012334391,0.5096904,0.000057379228,0.000007841268,0.000004484676,0.00015903352,0.0017273152,0.29278475,0.19416668,0.0006408179,0.000072823015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056537233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.766749e-9,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21948184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024179975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049680642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942872290","doi":"10.1002/asi.24316","title":"Female citation impact superiority 1996–2018 in six out of seven English‐speaking nations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Disadvantage; Promotion (chess); Citation impact; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Political science; Gender inequality; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.23169804307012667,"score_gpt":0.5053245853907983,"score_spread":0.27362654232067163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942872290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99077916,0.000101898164,0.0012042703,0.0019468464,0.0028908607,0.00058996683,0.000119099706,0.000009218445,0.0023586738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991095,0.000111810776,0.00060598005,0.000033941877,0.00004885628,0.0000072402618,0.000002534699,0.000003089076,0.00007705578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097,0.00010550415,0.0016648109,0.00021588775,0.0066959015,0.00034786976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96854824,0.0024574914,0.0044395737,0.00046650865,0.024006486,0.000081729544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04603182,0.00012362051,0.00045533563,0.06336512,0.00028701022,0.0012171268,0.0026242377,0.00039489096,0.000007878365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22653261,0.00007778316,0.0002043287,0.06911848,0.00027080142,0.0036315538,0.0010975389,0.00067100767,0.000007254439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025725994,0.00006507172,0.95448333,0.00004076793,0.000038595903,1.4635991e-7,0.007318786,0.0027128896,0.00045890908,0.003981396,0.0010099154,0.029864462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016973021,0.00042672173,0.9094021,0.0001695754,0.00003832616,0.000007734765,0.01020031,0.018714689,0.002850591,0.029091917,0.027091134,0.00030964092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000432662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057803987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18050078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013467027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018810069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943045807","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1234","title":"Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Innovation Management Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Action research; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.8807511459485838,"score_gpt":0.6990082681212841,"score_spread":0.1817428778272997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943045807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8062158,0.006714733,0.078612745,0.0884257,0.0009919661,0.008672619,0.00003359008,0.00026731126,0.0100655155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701876,0.017170254,0.004667729,0.0028221982,0.00009168446,0.00075103913,0.00024385226,0.000031648866,0.0040339767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99210715,0.00030871166,0.0019226458,0.0008693955,0.004191913,0.0006001981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846211,0.0005093073,0.0008483677,0.001264248,0.012714208,0.00004278975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07519066,0.00014630075,0.0003773593,0.17555824,0.00020617743,0.0010396475,0.0019195263,0.00020200646,0.00075849664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022007665,0.00012060938,0.00004382996,0.44718435,0.000074242955,0.0017406634,0.00047138325,0.0005659196,0.00045379985],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062952163,0.00010293627,0.054626074,0.00029649344,0.000009508484,8.9878455e-7,0.0000073322426,0.0000034135355,0.00074890617,0.18371457,0.01590887,0.7445747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001165869,0.00034369138,0.11124003,0.001253665,0.000011812418,0.000006839173,0.0007729172,0.001947043,0.0009270511,0.15783001,0.72412986,0.0003712393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000082995775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007654504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74420345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003362597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007409493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943180993","doi":"10.1111/mec.15063","title":"Some perspective on <i>Molecular Ecology</i> perspectives: Are women being left out?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09486146695937771,"score_gpt":0.4707250548417846,"score_spread":0.3758635878824069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943180993","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11068143,0.0031105122,0.00042935286,0.0042245416,0.8539943,0.0020166314,0.0005530828,0.00016903965,0.024821108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5016534,0.0021572306,0.00059787574,0.004933013,0.4418043,0.00056701433,0.0002304936,0.0006396049,0.047417123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97515357,0.0021387346,0.0015009864,0.0045825513,0.013650087,0.0029740648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676606,0.01625653,0.0014734182,0.0032240448,0.010366662,0.0010187415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016355375,0.0010970883,0.002460007,0.057874814,0.0005173381,0.0022870672,0.007233196,0.0032488538,0.0015744339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15246761,0.00095337507,0.00097371783,0.031535473,0.0008167205,0.00047807037,0.0027975126,0.0038924566,0.007271774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019403677,0.0007543091,0.0019548202,0.00003166327,0.00048219677,0.0019083283,0.002334403,0.00021368799,0.0008436259,0.01000034,0.9808109,0.00047171532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002853086,0.003960642,0.0035885277,0.00005096954,0.00009673747,0.0000195192,0.014285128,0.00017192794,0.0008533775,0.0777351,0.894514,0.0018709743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006427117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010920229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41219002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006395545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002730828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943373442","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2019.1608615","title":"A responsibility to commercialize? Tracing academic researchers’ evolving engagement with the commercialization of biomedical research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commercialization; Ambivalence; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Marketing; Business; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7522981823481073,"score_gpt":0.6398383169243247,"score_spread":0.11245986542378261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943373442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95999575,0.00023062613,0.013383166,0.02443423,0.00030572418,0.00074385,0.000008016106,0.000006204266,0.0008924114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579585,0.000058748756,0.0030078343,0.00022295513,0.00013680711,0.000007419957,0.000002152549,0.00001603933,0.0007521987],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661387,0.007014485,0.002606461,0.00054450677,0.022902885,0.00079295615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291109,0.031158913,0.0015085178,0.0012199268,0.036657505,0.0003442337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30720696,0.00014646618,0.0004963751,0.075928845,0.00043862135,0.0008908654,0.0027822559,0.00020204725,0.00040465564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17917836,0.00008147942,0.00010264512,0.27134734,0.00046722565,0.0012185092,0.00071811205,0.0020640336,0.000064920925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012230376,0.00069485523,0.23195882,0.00009382556,0.00013607724,0.000046902234,0.010556867,0.0010025655,0.3497611,0.016296335,0.12664108,0.2505812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034609553,0.0073458487,0.7860238,0.0007197885,0.000025812677,0.00009206181,0.020067887,0.004191882,0.035126895,0.022238154,0.120284095,0.00042283238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052366635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015305503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048858754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026233215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93454474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944222473","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.19414","title":"7. Quand les citoyens québécois font la science","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.17325012290152625,"score_gpt":0.3635988124241847,"score_spread":0.19034868952265843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944222473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033135172,0.017941136,0.002290828,0.0016095766,0.00042309705,0.0005754462,0.00020308704,0.00010328304,0.9437184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3736736,0.008134248,0.0026819455,0.00027064257,0.00019586102,0.000006536706,0.000008046207,0.00007228848,0.61495686],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98564124,0.00034537754,0.00090246496,0.0019952985,0.008978913,0.002136699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875696,0.0049212324,0.0007028989,0.0016449512,0.0031201807,0.0020411504],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010189785,0.00079505,0.0009557131,0.03541898,0.0025758669,0.0031697256,0.006817253,0.0009557507,0.0062184315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051632156,0.00073505193,0.0006521593,0.011345669,0.0035065636,0.0006370894,0.003995851,0.0013384445,0.0006181353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026836345,0.00012819291,0.0061118966,0.000048353544,0.00011132365,0.0017980573,0.0023751904,0.00021465207,0.0042868094,0.12319856,0.011088939,0.85036963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010559203,0.0004922499,0.037499662,0.00019894783,0.00016959914,0.00037923615,0.0007508658,0.0040830835,0.0025680733,0.03753121,0.9142678,0.0010034055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037940882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017068041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030274221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020175108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945259118","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03120-0","title":"Identifying emerging scholars: seeing through the crystal ball of scholarship selection committees","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Percentage point; Competition (biology); Psychology; Point (geometry); Selection (genetic algorithm); Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.5381788305996781,"score_gpt":0.5673536692852789,"score_spread":0.02917483868560078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945259118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96795917,0.002327723,0.014000928,0.00056792045,0.002319686,0.0005516954,0.000023706298,0.00006038281,0.012188766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991471,0.00017215784,0.004858774,0.00019968733,0.00009989599,0.000007697975,0.0000028956586,0.000025269646,0.0031626003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97251636,0.00072345487,0.0013944014,0.0012336134,0.022901423,0.0012307302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826747,0.0078114374,0.00089006504,0.0015239262,0.006724983,0.00037489427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06449754,0.00028014425,0.0005306949,0.09870425,0.000914438,0.0063294284,0.005844918,0.0002015694,0.0011437703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08997458,0.0001815673,0.00037719271,0.5707337,0.00035795476,0.0039975834,0.0018612507,0.0010440482,0.00089122215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020713947,0.00017432368,0.93383193,0.00003397526,0.000040779265,0.0000034069642,0.0010879834,0.00078883226,0.0168165,0.0037862062,0.002913797,0.040501565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015235633,0.0004461774,0.80859876,0.00010404251,0.0000385526,0.000041077365,0.005807728,0.014464337,0.022459041,0.027279511,0.11845284,0.00078437064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013371467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001857007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4720295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003159849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032035162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945263934","doi":"10.1111/petr.13455","title":"Publication trends in pediatric renal transplantation: Bibliometric analysis of literature from 1950 to 2017","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pediatric Transplantation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Markham Stouffville Hospital; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Transplantation; Science Citation Index; Citation; Index (typography); Observational study; MEDLINE; Retrospective cohort study; Citation analysis; Internal medicine; Demography; Library science","score_opus":0.18926390724222622,"score_gpt":0.47469290173080453,"score_spread":0.2854289944885783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945263934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857872,0.0015787006,0.0071435627,0.00044428254,0.00045723733,0.00035225347,0.0016020981,0.00003519903,0.002599471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798264,0.016306907,0.0012752938,0.00007134444,0.00023194043,0.000030172965,0.0017132189,0.000016004082,0.00052875606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892605,0.00034990165,0.0017268091,0.0012331295,0.006829777,0.0005998805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220437,0.0035208894,0.0006372034,0.00084765285,0.0023769832,0.00041293143],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007215534,0.0002789267,0.0006937652,0.7959818,0.00008879007,0.0012066893,0.0017290368,0.00028690105,0.0014211364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016856048,0.00023320239,0.0003831992,0.9270696,0.000023898074,0.0015549144,0.00005425439,0.00034976218,0.00038045243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019287529,0.00017233014,0.97244394,0.000043111006,0.000044601733,0.000019965162,0.0011914026,0.0020868753,0.00019772875,0.000078440346,0.0014716482,0.022057055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106329,0.00013826034,0.9945273,0.0000063330745,0.0006152596,0.0000030370525,0.000018254874,0.0027152426,0.00018082502,0.0002011657,0.00022264039,0.00026538188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040867866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028654817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1310878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009718281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014595159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998301},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2945705835","doi":"10.7202/1058719ar","title":"Usage et diffusion des revues savantes québécoises en sciences sociales et humaines : analyse des téléchargements de la plateforme Érudit","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.620234506676485,"score_gpt":0.5916260167964514,"score_spread":0.028608489880033616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945705835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92419,0.05005479,0.0014711072,0.004043656,0.0005056495,0.0006003593,0.0001396163,0.00016663995,0.018828226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006614,0.16566075,0.02547977,0.0005577333,0.00017424242,0.00003606305,0.000017590623,0.000057056764,0.0073554013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772174,0.013114121,0.0012656122,0.0015887022,0.0048782914,0.00193591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95039994,0.04548457,0.00067692646,0.0007492822,0.0020196862,0.0006695885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.111242585,0.00069011375,0.0010205716,0.033121683,0.0014705494,0.0050108344,0.0032482122,0.0011048269,0.00087162794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03796795,0.00054316054,0.0010333384,0.09052613,0.0083917845,0.0030844666,0.0013698612,0.0013746212,0.0002675086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041483883,0.0006503688,0.88291895,0.00023937502,0.00022026506,0.000020169711,0.016613962,0.000017984357,0.0072762696,0.009354637,0.0027526023,0.079893954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000591079,0.0007476637,0.5883385,0.0006926327,0.000095426185,0.000022830278,0.010833556,0.00076640554,0.002884589,0.38434866,0.009907462,0.0007712122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05726442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008963397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37499404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00411918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022231152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945867950","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v5i2.354","title":"“Showcase” vs. “Selective” Undergraduate Research Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Publishing; Undergraduate research; Institution; Medical education; Public relations; Higher education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.39995610308171475,"score_gpt":0.5071250470435879,"score_spread":0.1071689439618731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945867950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8639602,0.0029027604,0.007422709,0.07604294,0.0011487735,0.0014670443,0.000107162516,0.000071565344,0.046876818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95904326,0.006352445,0.0017386607,0.000035602654,0.00022264422,6.5864293e-7,0.000005190416,0.000048533733,0.032552995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.946379,0.008198693,0.001431214,0.0015882278,0.03904351,0.0033593795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93819463,0.017762696,0.0009246328,0.0019585532,0.038558356,0.0026011441],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15277065,0.00042493612,0.0011593973,0.09430158,0.0031960318,0.0044753435,0.008648979,0.00046540378,0.0016516774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021623973,0.00036449198,0.0008216325,0.17211789,0.002204785,0.002666555,0.0030168393,0.0066263853,0.0033932582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003722612,0.0029774236,0.3114137,0.00022995936,0.0012515151,0.00433905,0.011871181,0.0014884687,0.044483136,0.013464292,0.41499653,0.18976213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073843645,0.004451252,0.055572994,0.00073319435,0.00004531501,0.0012829796,0.08829988,0.0041881404,0.0072362493,0.7241416,0.10537259,0.0012914247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017111966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096186844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7106773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016802062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005290071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945890780","doi":"10.3390/publications7020035","title":"Did the Research Faculty at a Small Canadian Business School Publish in “Predatory” Venues? This Depends on the Publishing Blacklist","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Blacklist; Publication; Blacklisting; Library science; Advertising; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.729418124703528,"score_gpt":0.5529345160335923,"score_spread":0.17648360866993562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945890780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53732586,0.00018590658,0.000015068027,0.24400485,0.00044709662,0.0009284132,0.00038655745,0.000031331816,0.21667494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95583934,0.00003967036,0.000041650615,0.0014199177,0.00014793791,0.0002781753,0.000108888176,0.000020624797,0.042103793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708755,0.0010491606,0.0006751355,0.0010530619,0.008758987,0.0013761005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678066,0.013126633,0.0003007968,0.0040123747,0.01352829,0.0012253551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06050546,0.00017336675,0.00022270609,0.044485368,0.0016743684,0.03289488,0.009946547,0.00021791509,0.0065441914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2591596,0.00009422797,0.000109213026,0.2629635,0.00035829426,0.0031732451,0.0016657274,0.0016134329,0.0060277893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006238296,0.00007568908,0.34914657,0.0000023590835,0.000008156177,0.0000017250103,0.00029159713,0.000026295662,0.00003290308,0.019982649,0.6230253,0.0074004983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012455534,0.000011168877,0.4822216,0.0000055829732,8.496753e-7,0.0000020937143,0.00038607468,0.00059977296,0.000013797329,0.0018204307,0.5147367,0.000077353034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06312751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16771132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4185135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013558799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024836157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945894199","doi":"10.1037/amp0000480","title":"The publication gender gap in psychology.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Psychologist","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Scientific communication; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6825347326650658,"score_gpt":0.6538147044674287,"score_spread":0.028720028197637082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945894199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5729763,0.0007561387,0.0014359712,0.026376855,0.0013855902,0.00046566947,0.000009890909,0.000046503355,0.3965471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911672,0.0005071732,0.00046590174,0.0036106256,0.000045380108,0.000032532287,0.0000030526796,0.000009711909,0.0041584074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939058,0.00046123902,0.0006790703,0.00094185007,0.0033073528,0.00070473284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932688,0.0032456783,0.00039173441,0.0018948735,0.0010076979,0.0001912076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018317306,0.000128461,0.0002486085,0.014483079,0.00016803344,0.0013886896,0.003557021,0.000070340604,0.00077351683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013971588,0.00007185441,0.00010305645,0.13703427,0.0009483802,0.0002926402,0.00027634323,0.00038353377,0.0060087275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026301283,0.000081191705,0.46131122,2.6257237e-7,0.0000040125087,0.0000020749476,0.00003157402,0.0000025913898,0.00016227744,0.0022823603,0.10236361,0.4337325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026492146,0.00012561299,0.71104634,5.736875e-7,4.988989e-7,0.000005634559,0.00035742653,0.00020461847,0.0000066229086,0.0094679,0.2784281,0.00009173649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016029848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044699565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43364078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064488864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006394925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947490211","doi":"","title":"Croissance modeste des publications scientifiques au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.6594708204162364,"score_gpt":0.5778470048534264,"score_spread":0.08162381556280995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947490211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29115945,0.022792405,0.041158497,0.18184826,0.0037052948,0.00048769146,0.0002920511,0.0000819039,0.45847446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5284572,0.00051882636,0.010727114,0.0005159638,0.00030952858,0.00001337633,0.0000041849107,0.0000107117685,0.45944306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986617,0.00026530726,0.00089647487,0.0011268234,0.009473517,0.0016208548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864471,0.003095733,0.00021365972,0.001294701,0.0074901083,0.0014587246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015709173,0.00023715485,0.00030206467,0.032521605,0.0014044474,0.006814201,0.0037461543,0.0001508184,0.010196842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025277376,0.00019084231,0.00013838444,0.26044196,0.0013736361,0.0030742215,0.00089350255,0.00033806285,0.0012080014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024315725,0.00017529921,0.03976279,0.000012319301,0.000010789904,0.0000036578372,0.00012410148,0.000519372,0.00013992106,0.04475371,0.45334697,0.46114862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015911151,0.000030109242,0.059888333,0.000024223222,0.0000055723444,0.000014834933,0.00023484694,0.044657268,0.0022772013,0.0038525718,0.8886008,0.00025508984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84744287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9697707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46089354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024904413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012194024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948845587","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Mentorship; Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.6652650663412806,"score_gpt":0.638300049848536,"score_spread":0.02696501649274452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948845587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902124,0.0001494009,0.00095855456,0.0062316023,0.00022741422,0.0002695744,0.00003266694,0.000012716016,0.0019057193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866116,0.0001876591,0.00061997736,0.000031429423,0.000019063278,0.00000895633,0.000002343059,0.00000505187,0.00046434504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811432,0.0006162938,0.00047977464,0.00071418576,0.01617103,0.0008755482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96892035,0.01672061,0.000075268734,0.00073310605,0.012970797,0.0005798555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21793297,0.000089407826,0.00021661965,0.02189431,0.0003291951,0.0009881103,0.0015942464,0.0004426679,0.0000812314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24522078,0.00006818251,0.000031374322,0.20437072,0.0016232283,0.000575219,0.00074763095,0.0037833352,0.00008458319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980125,0.0002899559,0.30975446,0.00018918964,0.000011332811,0.000018086655,0.028278407,0.0061942358,0.23208155,0.3857255,0.0036375942,0.033729874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052319636,0.00052259275,0.84047383,0.00013741461,0.0000015595601,0.000005326934,0.014074828,0.1084145,0.004155393,0.01883186,0.012554756,0.0003047152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002371044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043070482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033883672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019364725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851495},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2949196191","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1205.4328","title":"The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers' citations in the digital age","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Reputation; Quality (philosophy); Relation (database); Information Age; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data mining; Physics","score_opus":0.7498797872388095,"score_gpt":0.4467508787489213,"score_spread":0.30312890848988827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949196191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836513,0.0003567801,0.0016445842,0.000691259,0.00015224834,0.0004100765,0.0001410724,0.000014790992,0.012937936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982624,0.00013568102,0.000009736711,0.00001877539,0.00008534469,0.0000015481548,0.0000129313885,0.0000084692965,0.0014650943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651843,0.0006500862,0.00035854842,0.00061816745,0.0013215948,0.0005331826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96269536,0.03526016,0.0002978912,0.0011374616,0.00039346534,0.00021567444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288475,0.00020232318,0.00022367695,0.0078101335,0.0010731437,0.004883385,0.0035381974,0.00019669993,0.000046756828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015779303,0.00009133999,0.00023556087,0.046970606,0.00048942526,0.0005206566,0.0016871582,0.0011526041,0.00008909185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073925685,0.000020976502,0.9828269,0.0000017202156,0.000022165004,0.000013699295,0.00070976117,0.0010216343,9.2766555e-7,0.008593801,0.0004407251,0.0063403095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013635673,0.000019863068,0.94942874,0.000007067793,0.000014405884,0.0000014195568,0.001983532,0.002213625,4.1671362e-7,0.043695077,0.0023733866,0.0001261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018365418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008495269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03916047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015878615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001694241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99614966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949583693","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468","title":"A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; European Commission","keywords":"Medicine; Peer review; Protocol (science); Process (computing); Medical education; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9312511098149691,"score_gpt":0.7778857900751988,"score_spread":0.1533653197397703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949583693","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.6306599e-7,0.65732664,0.0000014235507,0.008052633,0.00005750728,0.331575,0.0000250704,0.0000013165445,0.0029602558],"genre_scores_gemma":[2.3461476e-7,0.7587814,0.000028659977,0.0014342708,0.00004823783,0.2393721,0.0000044761173,0.000014432214,0.00031618364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700582,0.006245005,0.0049604285,0.0011955921,0.016834682,0.0007061053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776517,0.009946232,0.0052503366,0.004062115,0.0027754046,0.000314199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3248863,0.00043240373,0.0042979065,0.014388806,0.0002639744,0.0035922874,0.016821656,0.0002200787,0.0007074125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2737424,0.00016069807,0.000488415,0.077896625,0.0004053701,0.0005830478,0.0026582493,0.0012841804,0.00011941192],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005606694,0.00007488104,0.000032817705,0.20151497,0.0000090865,0.000028813873,0.000029558843,1.2631988e-8,7.591341e-9,0.000029882898,0.057306986,0.7409674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012103684,0.000056114528,0.000032075437,0.4814106,0.000030122847,0.000036918485,0.000023994855,0.0000015526042,3.3993995e-8,0.00018859893,0.5179803,0.00011865464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038268554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055093184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7408487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084907224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022439575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99744207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949716378","doi":"10.1098/rsos.171511","title":"Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":229,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Incentive; Publication; Publish or perish; Public trust; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Publishing; Social psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5007204611956686,"score_gpt":0.557571533408018,"score_spread":0.05685107221234942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949716378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62610096,0.00044722814,0.21946563,0.004853545,0.004450196,0.0017879584,0.000069492395,0.00017218973,0.1426528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94723445,0.000032611748,0.019604221,0.0009659164,0.0003003141,0.000023876719,9.090196e-7,0.000017374097,0.031820334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702885,0.00012666463,0.0008828108,0.0029262023,0.023676408,0.0020993792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782463,0.0014605381,0.00042503118,0.0024324825,0.015915971,0.001519734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08995748,0.00030428878,0.00049311575,0.009694794,0.0060120984,0.05358576,0.03589765,0.00016366848,0.0034534375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023759048,0.0001906756,0.00022213435,0.32586464,0.011092086,0.009578385,0.014114423,0.0005223866,0.0005114988],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035365985,0.0014809248,0.09236371,0.00004253366,0.00010516675,0.00002895007,0.012566107,0.15395632,0.0047527594,0.039627157,0.47865272,0.21606998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004550198,0.0002030686,0.01472421,0.000013817279,0.000007915317,0.000007893514,0.0024167881,0.92058,0.0010417873,0.0051045734,0.05503347,0.00041141055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010871402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045048648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76662374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035967346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059738294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949765072","doi":"10.1111/jeb.13497","title":"Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Diversity (politics); Relevance (law); Biology; Ideal (ethics); Science policy; Constructive; Perspective (graphical); Variation (astronomy); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Computer science; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.6039572518410571,"score_gpt":0.5908085345514162,"score_spread":0.013148717289640843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949765072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733063,0.002963627,0.0018872248,0.011118375,0.0029555778,0.00027563155,0.000057662735,0.000026499516,0.0074091097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937403,0.00023292597,0.0041863024,0.00040411032,0.00037821018,0.0000022587933,0.0000026122018,0.000010056376,0.0010432024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883938,0.0004527576,0.0010029379,0.0011738961,0.0075591546,0.001417448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765106,0.002447688,0.0010752287,0.00096586364,0.018031603,0.00096901366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031642333,0.0002606375,0.0005876308,0.083301514,0.0011123779,0.0010957422,0.0071973214,0.00023481944,0.00049030274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046286523,0.0001698911,0.00026432058,0.15521726,0.0065443204,0.0041844845,0.0014826673,0.00075105723,0.0001376763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017091975,0.00045334117,0.4995377,0.0000038163435,0.000038869402,0.000025012534,0.00043584133,0.00050309557,0.3315149,0.15616728,0.0071271253,0.004022089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095507875,0.005463947,0.8593434,0.000024921977,0.000015001848,0.0009605003,0.010598526,0.013987165,0.0016125495,0.06311095,0.04338549,0.00054242916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015869003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004216241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35980573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021985082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061373333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949884440","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0218309","title":"Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universidad de Granada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Citation impact; Citation; Political science; Science policy; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.8752949591281289,"score_gpt":0.5393694433420769,"score_spread":0.335925515786052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949884440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94898856,0.00021177041,0.000026332018,0.04588998,0.00007046338,0.0004073111,0.000040857005,0.000008823939,0.004355906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950454,0.0000210524,0.000094015406,0.00035020066,0.00007688551,0.000017071528,0.000005116649,0.0000065909367,0.0043836148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331915,0.00038730435,0.00034958398,0.0003484807,0.005306279,0.00028917784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725887,0.025512049,0.00012937195,0.00059964915,0.0010506304,0.00011955841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013253681,0.00009003708,0.00016067216,0.011256877,0.00026240243,0.0038253942,0.0015054571,0.00008318146,0.0004412077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07621852,0.00004352026,0.000054148022,0.059670195,0.00012058896,0.0009685327,0.00019803636,0.00059039274,0.0008879943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009838445,0.000119366625,0.993717,0.0000011285632,0.000026749816,5.089958e-7,0.00043299107,0.000011353652,0.00020336082,0.003444499,0.0011970361,0.0008361398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030883696,0.00010100552,0.99049944,0.000023399083,0.000005533926,2.608338e-7,0.0016454989,0.0007622744,0.00014832044,0.0061341156,0.00030808916,0.00006323235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048991133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055387532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06296484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011903878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014583833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950319932","doi":"10.1002/asi.21011","title":"The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Index (typography); Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation analysis; Social science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.17239204800978397,"score_gpt":0.5127840449258592,"score_spread":0.3403919969160752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950319932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805785,0.00031364092,0.0070375563,0.11105984,0.00022361122,0.00029842742,0.0000065021104,0.0000038741573,0.00047805737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950786,0.00056386314,0.0017148094,0.0026110185,0.000017849858,0.0000023970024,1.381735e-7,6.3271716e-7,0.00001064834],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953176,0.000043533953,0.00077734364,0.000077870835,0.0035531793,0.0002305147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991477,0.0019805194,0.0014363222,0.00030149054,0.0047636,0.00004104474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030115252,0.000049441063,0.00014840692,0.0036771034,0.0005669007,0.0006322358,0.0026291888,0.00003259479,0.000001104448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02590641,0.00001959614,0.00012787546,0.09067827,0.0021505635,0.0013931672,0.00013973402,0.00020598907,0.00000118116],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031929427,0.000044460936,0.016286928,0.0000018024842,0.000008217914,1.12058466e-7,0.001432373,0.0001005699,0.0015136902,0.032235537,0.026511567,0.9218328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013732782,0.0016980817,0.3842468,0.000021006352,0.000019205841,0.00010228779,0.07745779,0.027922565,0.0030791322,0.1332547,0.37065598,0.00016916204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007752194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028098639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92166364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006383245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004145863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950560487","doi":"10.1101/323519","title":"Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Publication; Currency; Creativity; Library science; Productivity; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.33668925938203803,"score_gpt":0.4782543302946712,"score_spread":0.14156507091263315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950560487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602606,0.0010668243,0.007237631,0.0016342426,0.00541819,0.00092842785,0.023165165,0.0002601931,0.000028699074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719703,0.00017586058,0.0013307513,0.0002466431,0.0008514053,0.00006927914,0.000011443929,0.00006988649,0.000047675607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97683614,0.0023047922,0.0023950785,0.0038143508,0.012029336,0.0026203257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90008116,0.044110876,0.0025727337,0.00856589,0.042132195,0.002537126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12920184,0.00077792496,0.0010546021,0.014806848,0.0028215582,0.016929178,0.011776643,0.0009771296,0.00022266485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5389118,0.00054986327,0.0003352159,0.16159925,0.003848749,0.0009200763,0.008544164,0.002608993,0.000638219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014805583,0.0013380734,0.5522942,0.000074480995,0.0010914565,0.00019903439,0.0038605453,0.00029877666,0.29237238,0.0041958247,0.14239404,0.00040063058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073972455,0.00009287672,0.90671813,0.000090820846,0.000039658975,2.383688e-8,0.000107811866,0.0040613962,0.06426961,0.0001692502,0.022711271,0.000999406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056073354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019087725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40970996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009367817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039339666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950659211","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0810.1426","title":"Modeling a Century of Citation Distributions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Environmental science; Library science","score_opus":0.7395991497083269,"score_gpt":0.5638645344195722,"score_spread":0.17573461528875467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950659211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93251497,0.0014571148,0.062155742,0.00043337018,0.0010341838,0.00027900745,0.0003162377,0.00003013529,0.0017792213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513066,0.003258877,0.0009993741,0.00002684383,0.00011929772,0.000021603691,0.000108937966,0.000013304753,0.00032113065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026674,0.00022293604,0.0011797841,0.00095286104,0.006870165,0.0005074952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110883,0.0015075881,0.0004582146,0.0013150753,0.0052995915,0.00031069966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072168126,0.00021561133,0.00049943954,0.034194924,0.00024528545,0.0004784938,0.0025123034,0.00033498398,0.00018354964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031739417,0.0001688657,0.0003773574,0.08169668,0.000182033,0.000281182,0.0023015495,0.0007271874,0.00030996732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003077771,0.0004146397,0.9341013,0.000045311426,0.00006987533,0.000023316543,0.00049433205,0.029818371,0.0010576996,0.0007186557,0.0057460796,0.027479643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005754457,0.00011319394,0.56796074,0.00010026321,0.000032941287,0.000009246349,0.00056629593,0.40495318,0.0012175244,0.017327284,0.0065354006,0.00060847594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029663814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010087419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3751348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017151813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005226395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950851292","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1705.03258","title":"Measuring Social Media Activity of Scientific Literature: An Exhaustive Comparison of Scopus and Novel Altmetrics Big Data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Altmetrics; Social media; Citation; Negative binomial distribution; Count data; Computer science; Statistics; Information retrieval; Data science; Library science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.9146932420703743,"score_gpt":0.47829983008480353,"score_spread":0.43639341198557074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950851292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97222865,0.0005378887,0.022945145,0.000026187274,0.0019312016,0.0002852127,0.0015224899,0.000016479245,0.00050675316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892104,0.00019370619,0.00039561678,0.0000017382777,0.00014955903,2.820901e-7,0.0000842151,0.000014884476,0.00023898516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925849,0.00031345888,0.0006403954,0.0023938306,0.0035321068,0.0005353452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849131,0.002955507,0.0019565343,0.0038070814,0.0058829873,0.00048479094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017118106,0.00032501007,0.0010402626,0.047706835,0.0007226811,0.002705543,0.008964031,0.000522968,0.000019146048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023795478,0.00029883292,0.00019508824,0.0741006,0.0015962344,0.0014747485,0.0117977355,0.0010084952,0.0000067838155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092343666,0.004211353,0.6632449,0.0007010127,0.0004993819,0.00016072733,0.0055653676,0.004620379,0.012183832,0.010976686,0.0027032972,0.29420963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023168223,0.00025898946,0.6259783,0.00035129988,0.0002679762,0.0000043149585,0.0015160576,0.3359506,0.008816269,0.022654584,0.0007731564,0.0011116129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032731958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024033878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33133024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015662653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082293345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950927168","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0808.2517","title":"Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of Nominees and Winners of the Chemistry and Physics Prizes (1901-2007)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Hierarchy; Attribution; Field (mathematics); Fragmentation (computing); Centrality; Scientific progress; Data science; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3440724253615619,"score_gpt":0.4528800998423715,"score_spread":0.10880767448080958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950927168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99273264,0.0018896002,0.0007876637,0.0024399029,0.00031585322,0.0006555095,0.0006640556,0.00002367538,0.00049109495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953264,0.0026741687,0.00090471725,0.00031249,0.00014059401,0.000036957834,0.00003841215,0.000031814034,0.00053447444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881251,0.00019276186,0.0016858305,0.0017470462,0.0074968096,0.000752449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768,0.0037008442,0.0013526309,0.0022758571,0.0043515903,0.0006390812],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053956513,0.0005548934,0.0016846093,0.19617869,0.00029328992,0.00095914886,0.0038027347,0.0004815907,0.00011698523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732534,0.00035662632,0.0006464553,0.74330586,0.0013578229,0.00035097188,0.005901036,0.00078575016,0.0000061392157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044632754,0.00027476263,0.97291976,0.00014155178,0.0007821749,0.0000068360587,0.00078949885,0.0013570299,0.0054648477,0.0000021941448,0.010762849,0.0074538365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054834795,0.00009457612,0.984043,0.000087295215,0.0003903037,0.000005046575,0.0005064869,0.006725411,0.0037662555,0.000067447705,0.00336497,0.00040088483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060071144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027275593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5471272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012667745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044083752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998886},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2951578548","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0184601","title":"The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operationalization; Listing (finance); Order (exchange); Period (music); Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Business","score_opus":0.8699690257526101,"score_gpt":0.6014741051212934,"score_spread":0.26849492063131675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951578548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99333405,0.0004929651,0.000043147935,0.005532221,0.0001102329,0.00031832283,0.000026004134,0.0000027652175,0.0001403025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983944,0.000053861026,0.0013179065,0.000006097109,0.00004714081,0.000006955871,3.2707655e-7,0.0000057840084,0.00016751405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872831,0.0011041536,0.0007773906,0.00038604363,0.009991684,0.0004575928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868126,0.008108726,0.0004599829,0.0011204367,0.0032206906,0.00027754903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05244862,0.000075838885,0.00026257214,0.0060184575,0.0010842157,0.0012321495,0.0020511525,0.00013993956,0.000018893963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26070893,0.000039113384,0.000037599624,0.041910157,0.0025540954,0.00031026217,0.0015713827,0.00045811528,0.000005001539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039390074,0.0006294844,0.84484905,0.000036668505,0.000018422425,0.0000019586676,0.0012588105,0.000004746063,0.13854465,0.004358233,0.00024556436,0.01001302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006420012,0.0002698384,0.7089609,0.00034212915,0.000013784245,4.5960925e-7,0.0012600371,0.15533966,0.09669856,0.036144443,0.00022153766,0.00010666742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022500621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094607836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20826031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005400179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004057329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951610038","doi":"10.1002/asi.21226","title":"On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mainstream; Discipline; Citation analysis; Scientific literature; Citation impact; Social science; Web of science; Impact factor; Interdisciplinarity; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Biology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3476440658245774,"score_gpt":0.5528947962903014,"score_spread":0.20525073046572395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951610038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564015,0.000045079243,0.0021361408,0.040993754,0.00011544184,0.00015251475,0.00001104938,0.0000058686223,0.00013862732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988484,0.000014183872,0.0006205605,0.00045717804,0.000019006558,0.0000013466573,1.5964693e-7,0.0000010337213,0.000038153772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571455,0.000034919347,0.0005275671,0.0001479318,0.0033010435,0.00027396667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905518,0.0040093707,0.0011152896,0.0004273196,0.0037673505,0.00012881377],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028252413,0.000073814444,0.00018934156,0.009200384,0.0016417269,0.0020941081,0.00203235,0.000044847064,0.0000023879545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049909316,0.000030762174,0.00018207773,0.09312412,0.0038636164,0.0019358513,0.00040953548,0.000360607,0.0000040960217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031946372,0.000034634537,0.44738978,0.0000025768181,0.000018954586,1.2155682e-7,0.001473605,0.000020112397,0.00060797844,0.078894794,0.038203955,0.43332154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018055712,0.0006013114,0.8039904,0.000008310373,0.0000068309864,0.000023016873,0.003558886,0.0011416301,0.0002161693,0.18618062,0.0040350473,0.000057222132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021555468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1633252e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43326432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012936562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037413315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951985723","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.6460","title":"Are elite journals declining?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Prestige; Excellence; Elite; Citation; Impact factor; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Hierarchy; Citation impact; Library science; Public relations; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8043521640401432,"score_gpt":0.46234284725115,"score_spread":0.3420093167889932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951985723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611087,0.0012585154,0.02208004,0.00042451982,0.0016556664,0.00037682196,0.00011392229,0.00007284016,0.012909005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729727,0.002218564,0.00029494122,0.00028038808,0.00023204245,0.0000010660351,0.000004925596,0.000024602385,0.023970779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923352,0.00059088285,0.00087116327,0.0020828622,0.0031892427,0.00093067274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843977,0.003751979,0.0019232528,0.0024125348,0.006409938,0.0011046146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01427375,0.00039112006,0.00079728075,0.058155287,0.000391707,0.004565749,0.0072430014,0.0006419931,0.00410131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02646982,0.00032864104,0.0006507051,0.10591158,0.00029520766,0.0008229031,0.0063735596,0.0016287417,0.0045560333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006004108,0.00032091365,0.8211538,0.0000352299,0.00018442195,0.0010660075,0.00011909071,0.038339168,0.00004818092,0.007131835,0.10373441,0.02780687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085695816,0.00007465578,0.42876223,0.000191968,0.00006579166,0.000011836032,0.0009182096,0.16460668,0.0000607704,0.35651475,0.046948444,0.0009877118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022840474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004135293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39239162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003191072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038170652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952166899","doi":"","title":"Mapping of Research Productivity on Nanotechnology in Canada: A Scientometric Profile","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scientometrics; Geography; Bibliometrics; Regional science; Data science; Nanotechnology; Library science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth; Materials science","score_opus":0.43557752336805244,"score_gpt":0.47755792123351615,"score_spread":0.0419803978654637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952166899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898255,0.00013092192,0.00011065796,0.0015490428,0.00028806593,0.00060532783,0.000041054027,0.000009398097,0.0074400646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942814,0.00003072323,0.0007655341,0.000010310298,0.00001193125,6.4726964e-7,0.0000014949283,0.000005397359,0.0048925737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879373,0.00040358008,0.00038382295,0.00088620395,0.008865375,0.00066730886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161935,0.0038570743,0.00031903433,0.0010499475,0.0029620382,0.00019255116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019151105,0.00010593083,0.00047246218,0.13941146,0.00016142215,0.000070483715,0.003047386,0.00014443157,0.0007309463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0143154,0.00010220815,0.00008752223,0.37770373,0.00042574055,0.00036839762,0.0013500027,0.0005672887,0.0001906746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396929,0.0004283178,0.8612915,0.0000639261,0.000015802387,0.00005084039,0.00041703013,0.0002742711,0.007892502,0.0016897394,0.0049025803,0.12283379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010021615,0.00044742573,0.96724886,0.000060379847,0.0000012915381,0.0000026225857,0.008726242,0.005300002,0.0037310177,0.0017387107,0.01157516,0.00016612878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40664655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28609228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23829225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092442083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032193083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99398744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952228433","doi":"","title":"Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Causality (physics); Metadata; Discipline; Scholarly communication; Bibliometrics; Confounding; Citation analysis; Selection bias; Causal inference; Psychology; Social science; Library science; Statistics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Publishing; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.6900457663182267,"score_gpt":0.6178974114266189,"score_spread":0.07214835489160776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952228433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98932904,0.00013885665,0.00079001865,0.0011593562,0.00015434783,0.0010354171,0.00062138564,0.000008188478,0.0067633744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646384,0.000111369875,0.00093939895,0.0000033881092,0.00002586705,0.0000016042101,0.0000271346,0.000013315753,0.0024140987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887267,0.0010250616,0.000633041,0.0011390132,0.007960002,0.0005162076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98481005,0.003967186,0.0015678077,0.0016728716,0.007684743,0.00029734545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020494668,0.00024999288,0.0009617163,0.022909136,0.0005975407,0.0024503972,0.013683583,0.00038569196,0.0011072548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011721007,0.00019213888,0.00041424774,0.044359244,0.002233597,0.0014113033,0.044138215,0.001003828,0.000025027352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021165358,0.00038471582,0.9838466,0.00014537275,0.000064718515,0.0000031460552,0.001394671,0.00021528816,0.00027124365,0.00027320467,0.011135263,0.002054097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988681,0.00012554205,0.9765893,0.00019260639,0.00001985037,9.738981e-7,0.0054770326,0.0018250115,0.0010733787,0.013694106,0.00012099082,0.00018229055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019697877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005359818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030454634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021629296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093749363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952431389","doi":"10.1108/jices-06-2018-0059","title":"How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Originality; Value (mathematics); Deception; Impact factor; Scientific publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.39352014307942196,"score_gpt":0.5364223676103,"score_spread":0.14290222453087809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952431389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96861666,0.0013792334,0.0013541597,0.025878498,0.000855616,0.00025585465,0.000057369212,0.000008781448,0.001593838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98556376,0.009136564,0.004809161,0.00033064853,0.000064693864,0.0000029630082,0.000007634993,0.0000029453101,0.00008161515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951102,0.0003527829,0.0011794153,0.00010073569,0.003091978,0.00016487525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795012,0.010956596,0.0016102938,0.0006033548,0.0071189743,0.00020956932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028790414,0.00008317404,0.00027543743,0.004695624,0.00023649746,0.0014447899,0.0012843265,0.00027951717,0.000027717404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05441743,0.000061874336,0.00008983593,0.01245334,0.0002890449,0.0035064556,0.00047759665,0.0011116,0.000002634232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009680038,0.00032347406,0.55154175,0.00041088316,0.00014079285,3.2230372e-7,0.20241626,0.0011603853,0.008019672,0.06039451,0.09235715,0.08313802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024248436,0.00014794263,0.708376,0.00034976422,0.000018103714,0.000021732205,0.040640112,0.011234087,0.0008211095,0.024287995,0.21135876,0.00031958963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039926534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024061972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16177616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084274994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046812027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952901605","doi":"10.7717/peerj.6702","title":"The cases for and against double-blind reviews","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ibis; Double blind; Sociobiology; Gender bias; Psychology; Behavioral ecology; Disadvantaged; Ecology; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Alternative medicine; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8242740004907603,"score_gpt":0.6397900203902531,"score_spread":0.18448398010050715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952901605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542844,0.022030814,0.0005539535,0.004334552,0.00098275,0.001561291,0.000023917506,0.000013213641,0.016215064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346438,0.0077655246,0.0007951375,0.00045351702,0.00016451094,0.00008867921,0.000004405437,0.000011168144,0.056073245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964062,0.000070069356,0.00038182436,0.00039129582,0.0024081867,0.00034242874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896855,0.008379511,0.00013530203,0.0005989911,0.0010271384,0.00017356059],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021015897,0.00007812163,0.00020671208,0.0064129545,0.0003138599,0.0022386,0.0010428244,0.000043411022,0.00010610775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020916784,0.000036705038,0.00010293629,0.035033364,0.000083207,0.0002214225,0.00030278447,0.00009414507,0.00063421525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026123863,0.00003027143,0.032988735,0.000012506983,0.00000743482,0.0000024503313,0.000065325534,0.0000026434407,0.0003974556,0.003207639,0.1367998,0.8262245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012813428,0.000082185055,0.0063233385,0.000004191736,0.0000020459684,0.0000042263378,0.00008572764,0.0008687726,0.00018419317,0.0018878904,0.9892058,0.00007032985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016296603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018929604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85240597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019876436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052287076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952984634","doi":"10.1002/asi.21062","title":"Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":791,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Comparability; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Library science; Computer science; Impact factor; Database; Information retrieval; Data science; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.20610781372987888,"score_gpt":0.48500233537019927,"score_spread":0.27889452164032036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952984634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98431444,0.0002977994,0.006482378,0.008312645,0.00019494852,0.00017763005,0.00003630698,0.0000066195907,0.00017722545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98742414,0.00063811266,0.011057204,0.0008519037,0.000018773455,9.752248e-7,1.6970706e-7,0.0000013769077,0.0000073492793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917624,0.000025681655,0.0008261605,0.00017990486,0.0068328576,0.00037300924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98152083,0.0020891898,0.0018852253,0.00044463068,0.013904839,0.00015525584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028689342,0.00008756949,0.00031841526,0.08190859,0.0009967969,0.0013235502,0.0036484655,0.0000390633,0.000002188408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056370117,0.000042403073,0.00009248457,0.60501987,0.010177258,0.002535862,0.0006570048,0.00026669927,0.0000013014318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000292866,0.000037070793,0.09949998,0.000004000544,0.000016735772,1.9137234e-7,0.00074499805,0.000027287935,0.013213491,0.009462762,0.015609416,0.86135477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010728461,0.0011233361,0.85455865,0.000028558297,0.00003204338,0.00005742517,0.019388316,0.05868367,0.0065371688,0.030682387,0.027645625,0.00018998986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031998057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015328283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013435821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016083916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953017024","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1410.2926","title":"Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Predictive power; Predictive value; Actuarial science; Medicine; Statistics; Operations management; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Internal medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7790319744087093,"score_gpt":0.4990017019218712,"score_spread":0.2800302724868381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953017024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7636616,0.00011855878,0.21894388,0.0003040874,0.0017395532,0.0011912965,0.000058927322,0.00005866687,0.013923418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643004,0.0001073015,0.00040365668,0.00014251242,0.0001566716,0.000005939177,0.000015678319,0.000026601401,0.0027116183],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260795,0.001667459,0.00054959935,0.002270905,0.0021542087,0.0007498621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834364,0.0095235435,0.00084568304,0.0031166803,0.0026193755,0.00045832945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031543244,0.00038751628,0.00072731054,0.018935079,0.0008661778,0.0175046,0.031237422,0.00033039853,0.00056270364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017136952,0.00025670097,0.0003530528,0.08208066,0.00042002325,0.0018588019,0.04647166,0.0011666163,0.00066285755],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026937266,0.00024173071,0.24544169,0.00015567854,0.00022616511,0.00030096894,0.00011890288,0.6702892,0.000044948323,0.027389832,0.01573998,0.03978149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000729758,0.000072170405,0.08412115,0.00014711222,0.0000575065,0.000004556443,0.000076560675,0.659927,0.00015663596,0.24960132,0.0046115387,0.00049469393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009240455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007078293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2327684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002980601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953193560","doi":"10.1002/asi.21232","title":"The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Citation; Value (mathematics); Informetrics; Quality (philosophy); Auteur theory; Computer science; Library science; Positive economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Economics; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.16186060476855738,"score_gpt":0.5397257732096541,"score_spread":0.37786516844109674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953193560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874116,0.00070644193,0.0007195485,0.010501847,0.00025175582,0.000275338,0.00000554148,0.000007999336,0.0001199336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830467,0.0005596229,0.00064455863,0.00044545578,0.000019740077,0.000004135604,8.1860286e-8,0.0000017263227,0.000020011727],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364734,0.000045041197,0.0007883285,0.00014909821,0.0048671095,0.00050309824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99191356,0.0021192105,0.0013174514,0.00040553967,0.004112423,0.00013183702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022369813,0.000111196714,0.00029972498,0.051213697,0.000708058,0.0019586298,0.0032881256,0.000053760235,0.0000022838956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024051197,0.000044557055,0.00031202973,0.4048906,0.0017233227,0.0024662856,0.00036770833,0.00040154668,0.0000038132937],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039306837,0.000024922612,0.017000925,0.0000011518795,0.000010810855,2.4558761e-7,0.0003460952,0.000021226335,0.003104166,0.0006798334,0.007370695,0.9714006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024801316,0.005254363,0.8166134,0.000032204993,0.000014776679,0.00027325272,0.01615048,0.027591992,0.019152699,0.020035518,0.091982424,0.00041876142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013798982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.7263585e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97098184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033409536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046419483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954177755","doi":"10.1136/jim-2019-001009","title":"Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Constructive; Ambiguity; Quality (philosophy); Simplicity; Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Data science; Positive economics; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.9343851372748704,"score_gpt":0.721338219021008,"score_spread":0.21304691825386235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954177755","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039487006,0.9907439,0.00017941932,0.0016354951,0.0015396264,0.0007830026,0.000052987674,0.0000030749775,0.0011137972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00092768826,0.99555415,0.00096140854,0.0001749626,0.0011731581,0.0000036123413,0.000005393478,0.00004855096,0.0011510783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759489,0.003342012,0.004800403,0.0007307199,0.014289996,0.00088794564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701331,0.009861203,0.008017326,0.0010382101,0.008318768,0.0026313676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06642177,0.0006547079,0.005646014,0.110276766,0.00017328595,0.0032065385,0.011880306,0.00040530332,0.0024491036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11906672,0.00029700718,0.00079779665,0.12862659,0.0012030781,0.0028075988,0.0012364846,0.0039578327,0.00017987179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037449725,0.0001596046,0.0033805359,0.0003132415,0.0001838317,0.00057500537,0.0006705622,0.00001519776,0.00003418185,0.00009907892,0.04198893,0.95254236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017859288,0.005056918,0.004590649,0.014458466,0.00018328613,0.001627166,0.0007426769,0.00006710504,0.000009715558,0.010168894,0.960868,0.00044117298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014770884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030982806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95210123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013889257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066164415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954205856","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1","title":"How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Incentive; Library science; Political science; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Public relations; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5915490014438257,"score_gpt":0.5835091969205798,"score_spread":0.00803980452324593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954205856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819898,0.0029477142,0.0010413174,0.00606135,0.0010003165,0.002474082,0.0011330147,0.00007582845,0.0032765476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829507,0.00013989785,0.001991683,0.000045371668,0.00009510496,0.00013453883,0.00022076153,0.000032923814,0.014389017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97177213,0.0014446697,0.0012374086,0.0022560048,0.02205972,0.0012300529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93256354,0.025812984,0.0009091271,0.0026024175,0.036434043,0.0016778708],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04756975,0.00031015082,0.00066982117,0.7025377,0.00078468776,0.015614636,0.0037983586,0.00029417855,0.0004759513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26319402,0.00026311405,0.00008684335,0.9555584,0.00023542183,0.003501321,0.0016792578,0.0006130276,0.0006081595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007055468,0.0011750667,0.61699533,0.0000067399587,0.000061611594,7.375871e-7,0.003891633,0.00005384746,0.014558907,0.0006094109,0.33280566,0.029770462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013994131,0.0015527327,0.8760884,0.000014699933,0.000027934573,5.1814453e-7,0.022885477,0.0046703247,0.0007849813,0.0026503012,0.08950081,0.00042440085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019627712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003318974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25909305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000587261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067902525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955631702","doi":"10.1111/cid.12810","title":"The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008‐2017: A bibliometric analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dentistry; Bibliometrics; Citation; Scopus; Government (linguistics); Citation analysis; Medicine; Subject (documents); Commercialization; Library science; Dental research; Web of science; Period (music); MEDLINE; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7769852019218009,"score_gpt":0.6830523692882974,"score_spread":0.0939328326335035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955631702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802386,0.0100139985,0.000017385759,0.0026388979,0.0018286719,0.00063703855,0.00005770428,0.000008660878,0.0045590387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862344,0.009039131,0.000019444506,0.00001837126,0.000074760486,0.000020924943,0.00001036174,0.000010085862,0.0045725033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670802,0.011412159,0.002659802,0.0014775399,0.015131107,0.0022392012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8515741,0.1417635,0.00043683185,0.0019447505,0.0037231464,0.000557624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2984419,0.00019108692,0.00082998304,0.39707202,0.0015513289,0.0034695526,0.006026392,0.0006421983,0.0003884048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06210956,0.00008957701,0.00045028012,0.81475496,0.0029855734,0.00033615375,0.0021956787,0.0041103396,0.0010136596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002522648,0.0003655972,0.90347123,0.000028610684,0.00039132053,0.0032578383,0.00029093487,0.000021501926,0.00013704941,0.002036522,0.020791277,0.068955846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092525943,0.0006739248,0.95808285,0.000032044456,0.000039583025,0.004971016,0.005665898,0.0028993671,0.000039022674,0.008317101,0.018189145,0.00016481089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037968231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001791257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41768295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005269462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039726286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976414},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2955873301","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4","title":"The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Citation; Internationalization; Foreign language; Citation index; Impact factor; Scientific communication; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Consumption (sociology); Artifact (error); Scientometrics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.34542183294758166,"score_gpt":0.5814282516665357,"score_spread":0.236006418718954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955873301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9018667,0.00061490666,0.0013327581,0.00024741524,0.0014756516,0.0006967943,0.00009095738,0.000022638364,0.09365218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944675,0.00007381278,0.0010178257,0.000058068163,0.00007487888,0.000019324729,0.000005186096,0.000010364544,0.0042730127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97952145,0.00012466194,0.00082433457,0.00090268505,0.017645406,0.000981442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799633,0.011449912,0.0006208788,0.0008780792,0.0067739016,0.00031390542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.062178716,0.00017452335,0.000344946,0.08917785,0.0011526555,0.0027499814,0.0052497867,0.00009178874,0.00016474965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11688691,0.00009311091,0.00023739002,0.5141261,0.0011355059,0.0010036702,0.00073695445,0.00019063121,0.00012322004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104797145,0.00017411394,0.38074687,0.000032231805,0.000018574585,0.0000012871133,0.0019325325,0.000033459808,0.0406542,0.064988695,0.0021479782,0.5091652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017745101,0.0008786184,0.8985406,0.000012157224,0.000013497525,0.0000036860718,0.019622473,0.010949568,0.007718425,0.025862094,0.03410206,0.00052229466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001615571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007617001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017799286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050655234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828523},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2956147372","doi":"10.11575/prism/33232","title":"Midterm External Review Panel Discussion of the Academic Research and University Libraries: Creating a New Model for Collaboration research project","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.6432148810038621,"score_gpt":0.5326285668549855,"score_spread":0.11058631414887665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956147372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54196095,0.007311072,0.41824,0.016234571,0.00019999423,0.003960659,0.000029383826,0.00002961247,0.012033712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6375181,0.02019709,0.11213453,0.00012051674,0.00015822526,0.0000026931402,0.000010643735,0.000037654932,0.22982056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306166,0.0007206041,0.0002929557,0.0005421553,0.0049425564,0.0004400864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139833,0.002618073,0.00030002146,0.0006522418,0.0047756042,0.00025573818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01706087,0.00009002171,0.00029189413,0.01005475,0.0011190415,0.00017444172,0.0024690207,0.00016380979,0.00007368195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109779835,0.0000582568,0.00009870048,0.051410466,0.0014171998,0.0009908292,0.002083353,0.0005168068,0.0000054652714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012732289,0.00026751176,0.02921049,0.00066542666,0.00004873728,0.000010106815,0.018674253,0.0000027860758,0.010251319,0.017605115,0.23698404,0.685007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029101868,0.0016123739,0.052625332,0.0023444411,0.000059720176,0.000006176534,0.009765634,0.72112757,0.0024109562,0.09859597,0.108118266,0.00042335753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006783883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004062556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72112477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012256354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016705738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99735296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957489133","doi":"","title":"2003. 03. 021. Робитель Ж. П. , годин Б. Оценка научной продуктивности правительства: библиометрический профиль Канады. Robitaille J. P. , Godin B. evaluation of governments' scientific output: a bibliometric profile of Canada // Science A. Publ. Policy. Guildford, 2002. Vol. 29, n 1. P. 5968","year":2003,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 8, Науковедение: Реферативный журнал","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2790156010633753,"score_gpt":0.46867937536059084,"score_spread":0.18966377429721554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957489133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7213484,0.05377369,0.0023886482,0.003328734,0.034935284,0.016825048,0.01137268,0.00056438614,0.15546311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929629,0.0029514101,0.004365881,0.00064179435,0.0014113279,0.0008377234,0.0004068017,0.0007171467,0.059038915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8411092,0.007918748,0.016098894,0.012985792,0.10704867,0.0148386955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8513377,0.008001908,0.013502488,0.015550787,0.102369204,0.009237918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1613422,0.005207418,0.007746536,0.3500937,0.0069341394,0.012398494,0.025780657,0.0028143195,0.028239513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28746969,0.00489573,0.0026571136,0.7650594,0.013000013,0.0107922545,0.008796141,0.005139407,0.0029277506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011525541,0.011038689,0.051728513,0.001611828,0.0019379149,0.00025355362,0.0026093647,0.0076251295,0.029267505,0.014824427,0.760674,0.11727652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030092062,0.0058867023,0.16049325,0.0025068682,0.0031840047,0.00069709163,0.014656947,0.10953001,0.17847075,0.010880452,0.46982205,0.013779835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10985518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046332177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4149657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015322262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10775721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962952465","doi":"","title":"When is an article actually published? An analysis of online availability, publication, and indexation dates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Citation; Computer science; Proxy (statistics); Library science; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Information retrieval; Data science; Political science","score_opus":0.5826787799852704,"score_gpt":0.5603896212238578,"score_spread":0.022289158761412575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962952465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99297774,0.00009961102,0.0013913511,0.0043056,0.00005719842,0.00011985152,0.000120363096,0.000020861911,0.00090744795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996241,0.000010326735,0.002627887,0.0002946848,0.000034312277,0.000003383529,0.000111183916,0.0000051508277,0.00067208085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935523,0.0002562107,0.00069045933,0.00067879213,0.0045572356,0.0002650013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98873615,0.00081255555,0.00031774756,0.0012343605,0.008155985,0.00074319576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017599119,0.000093344934,0.00028644636,0.032742213,0.00008548724,0.0033183137,0.0014199007,0.00009522645,0.0018693634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04453663,0.00006552447,0.000058873833,0.11561168,0.00017507041,0.0040889997,0.0003941899,0.00010927742,0.000037994272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016137548,0.0004897887,0.87888426,0.0000014918396,0.000045295816,3.540718e-7,0.002549843,0.000026964472,0.00048716314,0.00033150899,0.014126526,0.10304066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024953787,0.00019196665,0.8622196,7.374277e-7,0.000038273716,5.6941747e-7,0.0013857005,0.11168647,0.0007017495,0.017671488,0.0057584844,0.00009546191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043995414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042328693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111659504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052162788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024626873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963137438","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.01162","title":"Publish or impoverish: An investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999-2016)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; China; Cash; Originality; Value (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Reward system; Economics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Social science; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; Finance; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.10138846246810347,"score_gpt":0.3355191526593974,"score_spread":0.23413069019129396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963137438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891832,0.0006105382,0.000058671274,0.00044169725,0.000771077,0.00022547755,0.00003490494,0.000012341722,0.008662121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968213,0.000042539534,0.00041283155,0.000013838971,0.000030819214,0.0000022194,0.0000017380489,0.000004458921,0.0026702438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931084,0.00021436127,0.00057271565,0.00055634964,0.0051891226,0.00035908262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954391,0.00033924496,0.00087254617,0.0014537738,0.0015482032,0.0003471335],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077609792,0.00012984512,0.00028375222,0.009245096,0.005032195,0.0006343517,0.0045113345,0.00011430228,0.000017205693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061032777,0.000085564345,0.000129696,0.022819342,0.0024214804,0.0028123325,0.0014688569,0.0002072944,0.0000058434293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016318903,0.00007533077,0.9661365,0.000022763163,0.000011619852,0.00008761064,0.0045171087,0.0005617707,0.018841932,0.0040618847,0.0006382889,0.0048819957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004609362,0.000073553325,0.97306955,0.00006407376,0.000008858196,0.00005921989,0.0066214683,0.006909013,0.011493721,0.0005672954,0.00056692376,0.00010538537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042062223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027179539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03934427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001676659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029561333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963403057","doi":"10.1007/s11192-018-2991-4","title":"Edge Factors: Scientific Frontier Positions of Nations.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Frontier; Work (physics); Position (finance); China; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.5202539924105214,"score_gpt":0.4967483396251277,"score_spread":0.023505652785393683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963403057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95128655,0.00026743588,0.00069148216,0.0002997774,0.0019076773,0.00056583725,0.00008718156,0.000016095491,0.044877972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96477616,0.000007851899,0.00021139486,0.000018068706,0.000026966845,0.000070783106,0.0000095116475,0.000005388974,0.034873903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257976,0.00010268366,0.00047245144,0.0005058874,0.0058746706,0.00046455924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942009,0.0020170216,0.00018500752,0.0007752359,0.0025489873,0.00027287815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010450792,0.00008118866,0.000204359,0.057555534,0.00021739819,0.0016761153,0.0015693328,0.000065695895,0.0010617552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015873557,0.00005558713,0.00014483371,0.1564026,0.00019292872,0.0006758517,0.00034560965,0.00011275002,0.00054362137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067403553,0.0002233412,0.842399,0.000005930882,0.00001598275,7.2516457e-7,0.00013907593,0.000020613199,0.0004827691,0.0037429067,0.04801904,0.1049439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018478245,0.0000140899965,0.9425492,0.0000014063451,0.000002716526,5.2271923e-7,0.00017079058,0.00021734154,0.0022903886,0.002897825,0.051593393,0.00007750461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025603791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008649032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1048664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007182911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009876355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963703009","doi":"10.1002/asi.24184","title":"Does the web of science accurately represent chinese scientific performance?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Chinese science; Chinese academy of sciences; Publication; Computer science; Database; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.15175066220293887,"score_gpt":0.47737886521789225,"score_spread":0.3256282030149534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963703009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859544,0.000032336473,0.00005649882,0.008863582,0.0025182622,0.0003199418,0.000010394801,0.0000058582054,0.00223873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987962,0.000060629318,0.00014027806,0.0000726019,0.000021835336,0.0000033430827,1.47882e-7,0.0000014305725,0.0009034933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829025,0.000042041014,0.0010142744,0.00020088362,0.010065757,0.00038681587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971706,0.0013779546,0.0025847212,0.0006649248,0.023576258,0.00009018511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07536337,0.0000766161,0.00021715729,0.02833041,0.0012408922,0.0022766704,0.004860746,0.000082269944,0.000015082323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10377699,0.00002662923,0.00009134622,0.15661454,0.0023851094,0.006628406,0.00092989916,0.0002594981,0.000027881166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021826518,0.000029999757,0.9133173,0.000009340772,0.000009930665,4.163282e-8,0.000615737,0.00012949415,0.015532856,0.008273298,0.0024919568,0.05956821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012475764,0.0003828642,0.7311677,0.000031594478,0.000014742251,0.000032972817,0.004266837,0.032620393,0.049437545,0.022610908,0.15801388,0.00017298765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021925732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002039251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18214962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003100042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020853593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963769888","doi":"10.1101/706622","title":"Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Publishing; Audience measurement; Promotion (chess); Publication; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.27668157907105473,"score_gpt":0.4268075425965433,"score_spread":0.15012596352548857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963769888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5976724,0.23459505,0.013403815,0.14138669,0.003552724,0.0062263487,0.0024117595,0.00052515767,0.00022608136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97631484,0.017356139,0.0048886356,0.0006120994,0.0003151547,0.0002856683,0.0000025078182,0.00008249323,0.00014244762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032533,0.00070862734,0.001226921,0.0023276291,0.004597844,0.00081365166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859981,0.0024375876,0.0008730679,0.002184802,0.0074718115,0.0010346541],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155624235,0.00058009935,0.00089741725,0.021717206,0.0005848869,0.022017775,0.0021482934,0.0006895584,0.00012603345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065281875,0.00043745228,0.0001893735,0.059561238,0.00018569049,0.0035694449,0.0028120505,0.0014575939,0.00011171262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029580748,0.00041742995,0.31819248,0.0029156846,0.00018928041,0.0000262344,0.0006452928,0.00006882355,0.009007948,0.00199267,0.66517127,0.0013433114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010235362,0.00029024517,0.73832446,0.007088837,0.00011915947,3.456523e-7,0.0005727404,0.0024131676,0.0020319214,0.0011476384,0.24485658,0.0021313431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004861664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009852082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42031467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002806956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065270654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964302217","doi":"10.1002/asi.23934","title":"On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Prestige; Citation; Impact factor; Audience measurement; Social media; Readability; Institution; Computer science; World Wide Web; Advertising; Political science; Sociology; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.4257601717227294,"score_gpt":0.498834196817826,"score_spread":0.07307402509509658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964302217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98697186,0.000022146842,0.0048964857,0.007253694,0.0004178352,0.0003028293,0.000046253128,0.000006767807,0.00008215557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985205,0.000024061279,0.0013018225,0.0000860523,0.000035613426,0.000007831195,0.0000012678913,0.000002077446,0.000020780775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954978,0.00007739649,0.0007954471,0.00013527699,0.003259511,0.00023452955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637635,0.017326897,0.002261937,0.00028022914,0.016239654,0.00012780094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020460324,0.00007489643,0.00018901411,0.023282157,0.0010899405,0.0009926497,0.0011770232,0.00011006108,0.0000037412588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23386689,0.00003933338,0.000059445392,0.07111643,0.0007358345,0.0026221327,0.00015174798,0.0001521107,0.0000015105182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021519529,0.00002348519,0.8857983,0.000005021844,0.000033447246,9.92945e-9,0.0020510992,0.0000119973665,0.00055493374,0.066930145,0.0020793155,0.042490724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068503385,0.0010918456,0.8685657,0.000011598673,0.000028974424,7.127773e-7,0.005399051,0.004281575,0.005878065,0.11257971,0.0014006227,0.00007715278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059849517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009111246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21340656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015917113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032226523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964514098","doi":"","title":"Relationship between Downloads and Citations - The Case of Two Economics Journals.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.4626521940274487,"score_gpt":0.5126796524414194,"score_spread":0.050027458413970716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964514098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98034835,0.00016567165,0.008663271,0.00056768337,0.00018649,0.00018311737,0.000093452916,0.000008229639,0.009783755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989564,0.000050845054,0.0008155071,0.000027848073,0.000052172105,0.000008021239,0.000006267092,0.0000030608433,0.00007988509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767274,0.00013055046,0.000961364,0.00013155873,0.00087964087,0.0002241345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99178094,0.0043781935,0.0011775354,0.0007329393,0.0017748069,0.00015561764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014197165,0.00008862134,0.00019288895,0.009665442,0.0019690518,0.0059232926,0.0010533847,0.00007207306,0.00004713506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047884967,0.0000565325,0.00007227755,0.008372018,0.00052400737,0.005806282,0.00035436213,0.00018597207,0.000068203924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041477742,0.000005121699,0.7476016,0.000011716617,0.000010354135,0.0000030049275,0.0015863333,0.000118343654,0.0000032661196,0.016848138,0.00052221253,0.23328573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028801506,0.00003418864,0.8623287,0.000011435014,0.000009852416,0.00012249213,0.0014072629,0.0040720133,0.000059880465,0.1306383,0.0009518478,0.00007601669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037333206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007661338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2332097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008510677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012118562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964681226","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029433","title":"Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Medical education; Library science","score_opus":0.7553702880246571,"score_gpt":0.6796434933006312,"score_spread":0.07572679472402588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964681226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788837,0.0005205875,0.0002614585,0.0024522669,0.000857562,0.0032282555,0.00002399206,0.000022124572,0.013750059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452597,0.00007651231,0.0006094556,0.00038923812,0.000052706044,0.00024147642,0.00001528318,0.000014344453,0.0040750382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97341496,0.000950433,0.0015138205,0.0012965113,0.021849155,0.00097510434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97728217,0.016844442,0.00053232483,0.0020415282,0.002458261,0.0008412569],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06498964,0.0002252279,0.000900946,0.84844804,0.000158519,0.004454008,0.008097095,0.00027057968,0.017793404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13268912,0.0001486424,0.00029975895,0.9791262,0.0001285897,0.0014499938,0.004962282,0.00047853962,0.00334789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044217348,0.00030850136,0.8486876,0.0000063121674,0.00010652488,0.00007575858,0.00007183253,0.00009926642,0.000028786262,0.00083231635,0.006440683,0.14290026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028662465,0.00022029373,0.9619479,0.000029440806,0.00002630973,0.0000040740247,0.00037845617,0.02889471,0.000117481606,0.0017001027,0.0035476878,0.0002672996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012523814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041149528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14263296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017995117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010006904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965027585","doi":"10.29173/cais1069","title":"Topic-centered Scientific Collaborations of Scholarly Journals in Information Science: A Pilot Study of Implementation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Social network analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Work (physics); Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Big data; Social media; Publishing; Political science; Engineering; Data mining","score_opus":0.347938953900304,"score_gpt":0.4843899783656596,"score_spread":0.13645102446535562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965027585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99612105,0.000052509913,0.000017966804,0.00044046,0.00026755405,0.0008441649,0.00014876836,0.0000041257485,0.0021033832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959576,0.000027257542,0.00019234621,0.000018326786,0.000010065327,0.000011725762,0.0000016656551,0.000003930396,0.0001389111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116075,0.00006634193,0.0015586485,0.00033959775,0.0064962353,0.0003784202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75578725,0.00044701147,0.0020362542,0.00035434923,0.24123718,0.00013796131],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018206071,0.00013171716,0.00044829695,0.019870536,0.00019122346,0.017667333,0.0040649367,0.0000529178,0.000111318186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1139784,0.00009171817,0.00007504997,0.0723611,0.0005689658,0.05235814,0.0011051527,0.00023782141,0.000004774936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089429544,0.0004711215,0.8812917,0.00004640567,0.000016001066,8.1251066e-8,0.02197207,0.000013972992,0.08701401,0.0026895478,0.0003349562,0.0060607437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012983608,0.0016435912,0.9129223,0.00007963662,0.000012994539,0.0000019495383,0.039932065,0.00049415685,0.040211886,0.0019778067,0.001323833,0.00010139349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004367322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008507719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23537351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010342065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012925809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965782589","doi":"10.29173/cais984","title":"The concentration of journal use in Canadian universities","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Documentation; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20807835883681525,"score_gpt":0.414279410299527,"score_spread":0.20620105146271173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965782589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790526,0.0014247741,0.000016664912,0.007981681,0.00094640744,0.00025448075,0.00026961428,0.0000029700152,0.0100508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298054,0.0016102332,0.0001682335,0.00008723436,0.00013134064,0.0000016708734,6.7139285e-7,0.000009519326,0.0050105406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944924,0.00013253116,0.000994087,0.00032895635,0.003090368,0.0009616329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6761578,0.0031916124,0.0020874483,0.00042620694,0.31729358,0.0008433926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010963152,0.00020680639,0.00045359763,0.006835618,0.00052937336,0.0143842185,0.0049161906,0.0002325032,0.00015981335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14675197,0.00013338173,0.00020430029,0.028431298,0.00308399,0.015417964,0.0007663672,0.0005183197,0.00000766461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020355139,0.0001277597,0.8566625,0.00007256556,0.00008069382,0.0000052495748,0.028619694,0.000007600252,0.003018332,0.0537819,0.016172752,0.04124741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008580531,0.0009138352,0.53573954,0.0004891604,0.000052230207,0.00006254825,0.03241326,0.003517059,0.019172568,0.011001928,0.39547935,0.00030045575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08863662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027903153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3793066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046775426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004993229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965807014","doi":"10.29173/cais922","title":"Publishing Productivity of Faculty at Research Universities","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publishing; Humanities; Aggregate (composite); Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Art; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.43570120507658433,"score_gpt":0.47684137235416957,"score_spread":0.04114016727758524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965807014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401683,0.0012809149,0.000035761674,0.031491436,0.0006214226,0.00049720134,0.0015939273,0.00001554872,0.024295485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495891,0.00073786406,0.00034447052,0.000025391259,0.0001562876,0.000008524945,0.000002130505,0.000021099764,0.04911515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860259,0.00031493945,0.0011918381,0.0010314812,0.010049087,0.0013867427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4152673,0.007171026,0.0025632584,0.0010294038,0.5731735,0.0007954741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03081847,0.00034675727,0.00090571784,0.015131564,0.0005176996,0.014003712,0.009901417,0.00044885415,0.00043911682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42324883,0.00020969422,0.0004085531,0.055482622,0.004968116,0.046633713,0.008144331,0.0007665099,0.000027903718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052285497,0.00066047604,0.62303704,0.0006482635,0.00018369865,0.0000045916145,0.028032895,0.0000027012195,0.07514531,0.051384337,0.07667705,0.14370075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012969204,0.0010244244,0.3030236,0.0011486489,0.00006481749,0.00003857054,0.025048751,0.0002026139,0.24755621,0.025054764,0.39504442,0.0004962432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018322364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000573118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57075864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007201087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00236516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965833455","doi":"10.29173/cais981","title":"The Key to Fostering Transdisciplinary Research Collaboration: Finding the Connections","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45543711821229266,"score_gpt":0.523621476118981,"score_spread":0.06818435790668836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965833455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389109,0.000184451,0.00010866317,0.03370035,0.0005143314,0.0006810879,0.000102104095,0.0000174138,0.025780704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630314,0.000105337196,0.00022434129,0.00012461221,0.00024499168,0.00006170853,5.1724976e-7,0.000014947526,0.0029204008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919813,0.00018635938,0.0008558837,0.00057063106,0.0055797184,0.00082606205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5580523,0.01111534,0.0010279414,0.001204661,0.4280268,0.0005729928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025373917,0.00019471112,0.00034471773,0.0056152306,0.0023621419,0.023474034,0.0079185795,0.00013457831,0.000079660065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2547631,0.00009534489,0.00017104555,0.06480019,0.0017687134,0.0057979617,0.0034734122,0.000526961,0.00004133099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012347563,0.00041634924,0.1436983,0.00011482909,0.00021635191,0.0000034834418,0.39333212,0.000036801397,0.065266185,0.08710854,0.18760706,0.120965205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067610136,0.0018476176,0.18530224,0.00021251522,0.000035181933,0.000040276114,0.11779441,0.0025617522,0.07233311,0.058188736,0.5605738,0.00043422356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010069471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001549113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43392906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012063856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065545173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966651927","doi":"10.29173/cais1032","title":"Does advisors’ disciplinary background affect LIS doctoral students’ publishing productivity and quality?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publishing; Affect (linguistics); Publication; Library science; Discipline; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.3665895801454556,"score_gpt":0.4895629892077032,"score_spread":0.12297340906224757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966651927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989755,0.00014864557,0.000038217728,0.0044836984,0.00057561893,0.00049638713,0.00018459697,0.000029843255,0.0042880294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968889,0.00007110972,0.0003433243,0.000069833004,0.00032714277,0.00001872154,0.0000018693797,0.00001857123,0.0022605578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903254,0.00018506747,0.0010377738,0.0010325691,0.0066452194,0.0007739577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.735903,0.004347656,0.0027404386,0.0012013639,0.25496733,0.00084020535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02310056,0.0003239304,0.00075877114,0.0067198267,0.00047502993,0.04653176,0.007174326,0.00021693538,0.00009166447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2862977,0.00016668657,0.00022674898,0.027552713,0.0018062496,0.036077205,0.0060197767,0.00051350944,0.000008342717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172806,0.0002677763,0.9587716,0.000103394406,0.000052512052,6.889145e-7,0.0103881145,2.189272e-7,0.007578729,0.0034615954,0.0038978492,0.015304749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051146874,0.00054818136,0.9534669,0.00010230304,0.000025030387,0.00000821035,0.005232526,0.00009783547,0.012444922,0.012142071,0.015140225,0.00028033697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005348814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011746489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26319715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094882234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031505653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966757429","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.07.016","title":"Playing the game of scientific publishing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6921251465731033,"score_gpt":0.622700387842901,"score_spread":0.06942475873020226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966757429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732011,0.00039930554,0.00008677645,0.0014783556,0.0013881349,0.00011658465,0.00002167789,0.000011947384,0.023296118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909868,0.000019774365,0.0002113538,0.00014986533,0.00014577548,0.0000019446652,0.00000512019,0.0000054968204,0.008473851],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99091166,0.00018113376,0.001233945,0.0008731256,0.0063812206,0.0004188895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776806,0.016585974,0.0005488066,0.0021022256,0.0027430058,0.00033934417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05728471,0.000096318625,0.00030279474,0.0040069525,0.00019082002,0.005138165,0.0046569174,0.0002167888,0.0011249833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16899522,0.00005210457,0.00031086808,0.06822942,0.000793071,0.00051472586,0.0013001357,0.000594205,0.0006631626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002282935,0.00016343301,0.82086015,0.000014669579,0.000016826436,0.0000024614683,0.00003428014,0.0000059555678,0.041098442,0.00031403007,0.051250387,0.08621656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002103169,0.0002654065,0.6537602,0.00008760372,0.000020814166,0.000015400223,0.0014011089,0.011329968,0.17736942,0.01593393,0.13709989,0.00061309396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009975358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.65116e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16709992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000285107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035757563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968338061","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Jo VanEvery’s (2016, 2018, 2019) Short Guides. Self-published.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.6523194840558513,"score_gpt":0.6904671361149014,"score_spread":0.03814765205905013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968338061","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029902494,0.9013766,0.0002978266,0.0016016302,0.0028024833,0.0016722247,0.0001764427,0.00004456237,0.062125746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040121958,0.9165541,0.00082594267,0.006520735,0.00025857237,0.000038069,0.000023505887,0.00008380994,0.035573345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773285,0.0008813007,0.0037731582,0.0014396609,0.015492803,0.001084582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797887,0.005013245,0.0023437787,0.0028103215,0.008997201,0.0010467231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052077297,0.0004879476,0.002177357,0.049445532,0.00025554,0.008495798,0.02044223,0.00025300818,0.1897063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028404215,0.00034293561,0.00072911393,0.10799053,0.0002554941,0.011232486,0.006025968,0.00079524476,0.0010244793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034813726,0.0002682486,0.17439616,0.00030292134,0.00010387608,0.000015412455,0.000017174454,0.0000110998435,0.0027098185,0.000028768072,0.7958352,0.026276529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034300145,0.0000361025,0.21039064,0.0014766977,0.000046343797,0.000018199697,0.000023503102,0.000106441315,0.0039044996,0.0015804305,0.7816517,0.00042249614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045610595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052468367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18868183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025523017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011309327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969396509","doi":"10.1126/science.365.6455.731","title":"Financial crisis looms at Brazilian science agency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Financial crisis; Business; Finance; Financial system; Economics; Sociology; Keynesian economics; Social science","score_opus":0.3553210795804818,"score_gpt":0.5611473229630166,"score_spread":0.2058262433825348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969396509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626171,0.0002624602,0.0004336151,0.0011250564,0.0027805383,0.000306855,0.000014579921,0.000040446732,0.03241937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895375,0.00003974274,0.0009965214,0.0005341927,0.00007320342,0.0000058042397,3.785005e-7,0.0000074422096,0.008805221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697332,0.00007610812,0.00066287967,0.0021995076,0.025576107,0.0017522402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908284,0.0009608571,0.00026325937,0.0021916681,0.004809837,0.00094599207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052794326,0.00019852944,0.0003107911,0.059004426,0.001830161,0.0048025777,0.012230794,0.00008161213,0.0037058736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050325885,0.00013809117,0.00014578649,0.43052098,0.0035035159,0.0035333617,0.0042403922,0.00027911618,0.014665113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037376136,0.00022689516,0.47080186,0.000008724608,0.0000022942022,0.000032014166,0.0009978673,0.00012298813,0.27409336,0.012641586,0.028970873,0.21206416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040655435,0.00028048057,0.86761177,0.000008487819,0.0000022595932,0.00002217963,0.00037806973,0.0051195663,0.03860748,0.021460135,0.06565173,0.00045131182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000681916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018357627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39680988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061037525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027704025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969510690","doi":"10.1680/jenes.19.00025","title":"Briefing: US environmental science women are high-impact team players","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Citation impact; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.0751672395403767,"score_gpt":0.38218880267606137,"score_spread":0.3070215631356847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969510690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998348,0.0003814689,0.00022389997,0.00005734463,0.00060804747,0.0001015926,0.000023838411,0.0000064572564,0.00024935842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986688,0.00019650375,0.0006643562,0.00005311759,0.000055068438,0.0000010714373,1.7744755e-7,0.000010468766,0.0003504667],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887652,0.00002795494,0.0006402012,0.0006143988,0.009044659,0.00090760953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974004,0.0005117704,0.00044808883,0.0004712687,0.0000854488,0.0010829959],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015167126,0.00020325094,0.00038367973,0.016584346,0.0003511705,0.0015241995,0.0024097364,0.00005657414,0.00053724303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002538462,0.00014042061,0.00011014619,0.020424958,0.0012144682,0.002291357,0.0007996034,0.0003959155,0.00011318373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031723655,0.00022019801,0.3496338,0.0000043881123,0.0000146866005,0.000030330486,0.0004405515,0.02056734,0.6150844,0.0000549973,0.00016996294,0.013747621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005271958,0.00054727815,0.9674104,0.000015820278,0.0000032096366,0.00020529762,0.0008591627,0.021580646,0.006484074,0.00007399251,0.0020780042,0.00021492508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008896983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.172357e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011564137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002228983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969705482","doi":"10.1101/741694","title":"Gender bias in research teams and the underrepresentation of women in science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophily; Preference; Citation; Psychology; Gender bias; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.5573525771372841,"score_gpt":0.5221828900941715,"score_spread":0.03516968704311263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969705482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608916,0.0013293099,0.00021057832,0.000397642,0.00057624833,0.0011692737,0.00002529294,0.00001466383,0.0001878357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987204,0.0006622824,0.00035277352,0.000036759204,0.00005203205,0.00013217454,2.8527097e-8,0.00002423092,0.00001928524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98073876,0.0018353736,0.001395792,0.001959263,0.012317886,0.0017529367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98271734,0.008223427,0.00058368716,0.0026509238,0.005307367,0.0005172514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18801425,0.0002641733,0.00077515625,0.069390014,0.00021636272,0.002517268,0.0043938425,0.0003239565,0.000060022452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084691264,0.00017897882,0.00008971694,0.16613777,0.0024767143,0.000598458,0.004872154,0.0015570016,0.000062489635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014293678,0.00023330566,0.9491317,0.000119657554,0.000020025476,0.000020120573,0.0005183992,0.0007256595,0.04233917,0.0065044174,0.00017260831,0.00007198899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013223282,0.000042077518,0.9771096,0.00007750617,0.0000025729682,1.0650481e-8,0.00037698858,0.009704812,0.010029088,0.00085360446,0.00024800503,0.00023338094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011480948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020981044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10332298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016099991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004145738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970628700","doi":"10.5860/choice.45-2569","title":"A generation of excellence: a history of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Management; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.9256229350292033,"score_gpt":0.6469821433869244,"score_spread":0.27864079164227895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970628700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7018799,0.2740731,0.0017491773,0.0051900856,0.003898065,0.004789657,0.00051522144,0.0000106162615,0.007894191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8438829,0.07851886,0.017770778,0.0005153005,0.0007973877,0.00022774609,0.0000747981,0.000030452267,0.058181733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939966,0.00037518333,0.00094235205,0.00039420105,0.0039026283,0.00038901757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913327,0.0016911961,0.00039558797,0.001006021,0.005298634,0.00027586165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019043066,0.000090056885,0.00040640755,0.01354049,0.00028996047,0.00004081874,0.0019994453,0.00008335052,0.000106588755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09433657,0.00005069983,0.00022162519,0.053532362,0.0005978913,0.00028085225,0.00019317663,0.00024208154,0.000017884387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805705,0.00039392672,0.01946959,0.00022473752,0.000013374438,0.0000026997081,0.0005737462,0.000140107,0.021422075,0.00095757877,0.3203037,0.6364804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022065127,0.00007477589,0.008422653,0.000056020996,0.000002856684,0.0000021218448,0.000015690743,0.0017243648,0.00051061646,0.00011144416,0.9888028,0.00005604189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020721471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1587731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66849905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007057897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003369831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976402},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2970770262","doi":"10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.004","title":"Predictors of Citation Rate for Original Research Studies in the <i>Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Association (psychology); Family medicine; Library science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5083581348465751,"score_gpt":0.5500133106792681,"score_spread":0.04165517583269296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970770262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98392546,0.0015968318,0.00013191636,0.008596062,0.002472451,0.00075498683,0.0002916241,0.000002899333,0.002227791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953868,0.0022221766,0.00034756426,0.00012539278,0.0002486081,0.000010901506,0.000011906297,0.0000100366415,0.0016366135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867007,0.004071582,0.0018551925,0.0003592776,0.0058637527,0.0011495025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541909,0.023502493,0.0030905993,0.0003920502,0.018209103,0.0006148486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19365701,0.00016326559,0.0007490644,0.037522472,0.0005670593,0.00065050815,0.0021910514,0.00041020167,0.00008823416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22949122,0.00010950056,0.0003164647,0.039093446,0.00030849222,0.0005952956,0.00004817482,0.0011457319,0.000019441244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036146164,0.000028611692,0.8504333,0.000017752358,0.00015342161,0.000012353945,0.0013238883,0.00054758374,0.00020001692,0.001018205,0.14440472,0.0018240269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020101126,0.0010047542,0.9250124,0.00010282353,0.000030985193,0.00006495392,0.004888939,0.0005989379,0.00018004683,0.019646222,0.046266638,0.00019317647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022755452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3124021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28964666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054429094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970982669","doi":"10.29024/joa.20","title":"The Relationship Between Institutional Factors, Citation and Altmetric Counts of Publications from Finnish Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Regional science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.6515934642078601,"score_gpt":0.536494169042329,"score_spread":0.11509929516553108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970982669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98967177,0.0018811565,0.003320347,0.00049064786,0.00051743473,0.00007073857,0.00008516606,0.0000028381226,0.0039599114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972671,0.0002889088,0.00082337507,0.000010276722,0.000063368294,1.6238064e-7,0.0000071062063,0.000002979801,0.001536673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515,0.00012351199,0.00059389137,0.00013237158,0.003863305,0.00013688931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96379906,0.03134804,0.00079338055,0.00025190943,0.0036549994,0.00015260585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006608694,0.000060834005,0.00018192288,0.032904495,0.00022696603,0.0005714733,0.00079985266,0.00007544743,0.00013449506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041194316,0.000037004243,0.00008677676,0.09158565,0.00013652399,0.00070251577,0.000116258045,0.00024076611,0.00004905365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046623118,0.00001752223,0.9726643,0.0000016554852,0.000018754039,3.4236822e-7,0.00005682485,0.000017814089,0.0000062360914,0.010455506,0.0051312153,0.011625141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020277497,0.000077064076,0.9521393,0.000004916422,0.000010636452,0.0000015496923,0.000552282,0.00016303014,0.000025813595,0.009203531,0.037579086,0.00003999394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028692062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016479433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058681156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013603464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004997284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971042416","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.007","title":"Training researchers in publication science: why, what, and how","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Queen's University; Ottawa Public Health; SickKids Foundation; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Public Health Ontario; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit","keywords":"Medical education; Training (meteorology); MEDLINE; Data science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.9615521669344763,"score_gpt":0.7569815892662182,"score_spread":0.20457057766825815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971042416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8839457,0.0013985785,0.00109942,0.10961985,0.0015511914,0.00013242141,9.063684e-7,0.000002656911,0.0022492756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973984,0.0031911572,0.0036157954,0.0024675657,0.00021887317,0.0000011163993,2.5605962e-7,0.0000047799367,0.00076060044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97752327,0.008062539,0.0051733702,0.000985291,0.0070661916,0.0011893637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46088222,0.50913805,0.007637915,0.0017048895,0.01747363,0.003163303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.61363477,0.00009657439,0.0014468947,0.036549635,0.00008808431,0.0014007752,0.002599847,0.0002591971,0.00026658454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87481135,0.0000580945,0.00025725283,0.06586586,0.0013520353,0.0033316386,0.00056830613,0.0014300905,0.00006510694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004624389,0.0000415624,0.5648722,0.0000017854985,0.000004879406,0.000004969927,0.000069709575,0.000015749458,0.000058772795,0.0022594412,0.006006334,0.42661834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008370933,0.00073045737,0.8733989,0.000028329465,0.0000017507865,0.000040397208,0.001697177,0.008052322,0.0000071938694,0.040627427,0.0745026,0.00007637666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013468461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008686905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.516641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008662779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001247482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971950431","doi":"10.1139/facets-2018-0039","title":"Gender and language use in scientific grant writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Gender bias; Gender gap; Medical education; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.6367548393914112,"score_gpt":0.5589574579888165,"score_spread":0.07779738140259473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971950431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963706,0.00072078145,0.000084443855,0.00005724244,0.00037382392,0.00017195192,0.000016746599,0.000011535272,0.0021928358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960581,0.000014016943,0.00040789522,0.00005667113,0.00001319453,0.0000021862456,0.00000222408,0.0000050760455,0.0034406309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489784,0.0001072514,0.0003181243,0.00060071034,0.0036532753,0.00042276768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974069,0.0014886158,0.00006434112,0.00049117487,0.0003742464,0.00017475072],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012272138,0.000072240764,0.00016017946,0.028500455,0.00008957053,0.0041262927,0.00068944396,0.000055558627,0.00048697452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074661667,0.00005311785,0.000038051345,0.06989023,0.00009346305,0.00068013597,0.00047914564,0.00016067193,0.00084034255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041548224,0.00003325329,0.95287246,0.0000036853141,0.0000017141442,0.000025261226,0.0007563295,0.000018545108,0.011034257,0.00041099178,0.0017625006,0.033076834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003716926,0.000020183174,0.9865644,0.0000059133304,5.5102356e-7,0.0000053064086,0.0012910757,0.0039168387,0.0005804744,0.0006961008,0.0064503476,0.00009710842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011232718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045021385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04138978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003157823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056870736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972059405","doi":"10.1111/medu.13950","title":"Exploring researchers’ perspectives on authorship decision making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Clinical decision making; MEDLINE; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Political science; Family medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.8299299046977515,"score_gpt":0.6605614049079696,"score_spread":0.16936849978978197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972059405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637705,0.00047369377,0.0015765084,0.0065615918,0.0021950225,0.00024269696,0.0000011231855,0.000028615252,0.025150264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994836,0.00022273495,0.0010841391,0.0005603057,0.0002837365,0.000034697772,0.0000014780248,0.000011622606,0.0029653083],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.980721,0.0004209621,0.0004651968,0.0008086188,0.0170629,0.00052131107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424345,0.011439995,0.00015358196,0.0010938986,0.0023490582,0.0007200049],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033942465,0.00011273994,0.00019770348,0.027121056,0.00018470471,0.0011509282,0.0019465163,0.00013650613,0.009201776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29707885,0.00007677811,0.00010310488,0.06842271,0.00011645742,0.0007216569,0.00037646317,0.000662203,0.0051434315],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052330968,0.0003408369,0.02917554,0.0000037688617,0.0000037841237,0.0000027067529,0.0023620892,0.000007804466,0.000030007874,0.007013008,0.020775028,0.9402331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077329867,0.0006809324,0.7255838,0.00043009568,0.0000040838295,0.00001392196,0.040122245,0.010163984,0.00022815056,0.053133845,0.16841076,0.00045490227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038594724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053068134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034431933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014897331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972696013","doi":"10.1002/asi.24299","title":"The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Publishing; Ecological niche; Diversity (politics); Discipline; Novelty; Generalist and specialist species; Popularity; Niche; Originality; Scope (computer science); Discoverability; Competition (biology); Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Computer science; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.21595988960419174,"score_gpt":0.4803504685156588,"score_spread":0.2643905789114671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972696013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979494,0.00014679447,0.00024022585,0.01574359,0.002042788,0.0002323985,0.000011729124,0.0000042351962,0.0020842538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837935,0.00018284607,0.0003340128,0.00015172828,0.000042630185,0.0000013618194,9.800844e-8,0.0000013681683,0.00090660277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239814,0.000061482686,0.0010370067,0.00008974317,0.006170922,0.00024269776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801871,0.0018224033,0.0034090092,0.00031519122,0.01419531,0.000070972375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05126357,0.000056590565,0.00019140281,0.013248071,0.0006062308,0.0011047401,0.0025578095,0.000101721904,0.000008926854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08456674,0.00002561485,0.00010130924,0.049382173,0.0003652476,0.002752307,0.00042470876,0.00023319309,0.000015078298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008596623,0.00006124466,0.44808754,0.000011347698,0.00009306035,3.1796316e-7,0.002413233,0.00042415792,0.013039114,0.2914813,0.04521647,0.19908623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025011215,0.000630804,0.14024207,0.000036664733,0.000039332455,0.0000730245,0.015130947,0.008575463,0.05189907,0.17972404,0.60090625,0.00024118542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044157064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000040723676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5556898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023561696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051203347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973050428","doi":"10.1057/palcomms.2016.71","title":"Erratum: Reflections on science advisory systems in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Palgrave Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Advisory committee; Political science; Library science; Management; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5928247742743877,"score_gpt":0.560929275995768,"score_spread":0.031895498278619705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973050428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021213795,0.013330056,0.00027599023,0.0060132216,0.029924769,0.00084867305,0.00063435256,0.000044369597,0.9487164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85693175,0.016350528,0.00033362204,0.0003954092,0.0003841485,0.00032731827,0.000105236184,0.00005705102,0.12511495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819165,0.000983689,0.0015337325,0.0013457304,0.013002252,0.0012181094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746009,0.008530431,0.0007771117,0.009753991,0.0056283153,0.00070924615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018380472,0.00037640045,0.0007034777,0.077887125,0.001494224,0.0025911466,0.020995812,0.00031929312,0.00016080387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043670483,0.00026468534,0.00016002083,0.2017014,0.0011311918,0.00021607429,0.0036048456,0.0023143224,0.0006555378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004315455,0.00005829149,0.0022630694,0.000007781848,0.000012109614,0.0000068879544,0.000073816846,0.000020399064,0.000056460194,0.016959054,0.9661858,0.0143519845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020166782,0.00006255435,0.02366006,0.00022717215,0.0000071405416,0.000007262382,0.0008920614,0.002330259,0.0000061397077,0.011934016,0.9602509,0.00042077378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7194479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9189183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8567196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050317734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02328005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973447102","doi":"10.18438/eblip29579","title":"Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics are not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Computer science; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.6195672100766529,"score_gpt":0.5780895375151042,"score_spread":0.04147767256154877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973447102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.743586,0.0036446373,0.015568414,0.19166368,0.0015444633,0.0030289001,0.00034925182,0.00015209732,0.040462542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646396,0.0008821093,0.003502939,0.0075729443,0.000029885363,0.000016296015,0.00002620431,0.000006240492,0.0014994417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98268974,0.0012330216,0.0014004429,0.00037268456,0.013961594,0.00034254065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448907,0.042944778,0.002286887,0.0011257371,0.008345998,0.000405932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0656822,0.00014941668,0.00033208865,0.019264432,0.00017202723,0.0035788899,0.0010575831,0.00013923473,0.0038221255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40784857,0.00009294775,0.00011843369,0.07787647,0.000078672296,0.24870291,0.00034133956,0.00030832767,0.0003729349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057938187,0.0005428799,0.47202536,0.00031031447,0.00011298674,0.000004121609,0.0005404713,0.007857805,0.00070395425,0.04225952,0.11004166,0.3598071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010261632,0.00059217826,0.56030387,0.0001065928,0.000035775447,0.000009204602,0.001784614,0.07337397,0.005016362,0.00061369594,0.35686818,0.0002693709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052697254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5238284e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35953775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005343825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012673736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974793655","doi":"10.1101/19005728","title":"Checklists to Detect Potential Predatory Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Checklist; PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Publishing; Data extraction; Trustworthiness; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.6351952165897039,"score_gpt":0.6152920812067557,"score_spread":0.01990313538294819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974793655","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000072025023,0.99066633,0.0019108168,0.00023037272,0.002130906,0.004382581,0.00015743719,0.00004233628,0.00047200406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000012956145,0.99323666,0.0003006249,0.00033840837,0.00030081,0.00028823863,0.000012559409,0.00006480534,0.0054449183],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96513295,0.003138137,0.0048143505,0.0018501516,0.023823397,0.0012410221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819882,0.006869115,0.002235565,0.003699884,0.0032386554,0.0019686047],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09292248,0.0006874647,0.006696992,0.0860394,0.00020778271,0.0031987603,0.010559063,0.00060498656,0.00245668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1965556,0.00037326344,0.0021368912,0.23874462,0.00015036136,0.00036969068,0.0022286384,0.0012604424,0.021012278],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012645339,0.00004327969,0.000006971655,0.5447835,0.00011117707,0.00010599737,0.000006336059,1.0615553e-7,0.000001156629,0.000004826601,0.028109167,0.42682624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007065228,0.00009345814,0.000017554985,0.2846748,0.0005514817,0.0001893731,0.0000050544363,0.000019003524,3.075639e-7,0.000046604444,0.71399224,0.0003395087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000058907904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011455671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68588305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038211804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014265708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979198997","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvz024","title":"Do we need a book citation index for research evaluation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Index (typography); Citation index; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Library science; Social science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine","score_opus":0.9412224849470798,"score_gpt":0.7642154891255654,"score_spread":0.17700699582151447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979198997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8609644,0.017830778,0.0075164405,0.02813098,0.0018485655,0.024961956,0.000092803086,0.0000820624,0.05857202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429847,0.0006454031,0.00056053075,0.000059414757,0.00035502226,0.0018004513,0.00006227393,0.00003878331,0.012179659],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.84470934,0.014333956,0.0016577301,0.0025044307,0.13411953,0.0026750066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8360946,0.043446597,0.00031195904,0.0022528623,0.11715275,0.00074118667],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5927599,0.00021778983,0.00041102836,0.11170551,0.001184962,0.005648504,0.0031656425,0.00034628352,0.011677729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3318739,0.00017155371,0.00022843033,0.20163214,0.00038743435,0.002057452,0.00091896945,0.0011711334,0.0066332226],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003589586,0.00029700398,0.017754134,0.000040106166,0.000038025602,9.966508e-7,0.00094120635,0.0018385501,0.0054839216,0.0057954006,0.20874706,0.75870466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002722943,0.00077199814,0.040202692,0.000049637852,0.000010697236,0.0000016623088,0.003318897,0.61771464,0.00075727975,0.23427902,0.09995902,0.00021151458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012367575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038456892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021027925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045259246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538374},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2979403726","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2019.07.412","title":"CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-IMPACT ARTICLES IN THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Univariate; Specialty; Logistic regression; Demographics; Social media; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Demography; Statistics; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.31899003697260014,"score_gpt":0.4711654484148045,"score_spread":0.15217541144220437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979403726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99196786,0.0009026128,0.0005283674,0.0013394739,0.0019448475,0.00010779741,0.000098115146,3.8754013e-7,0.0031105457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909234,0.00008698481,0.00006644414,0.000110128334,0.00058679155,4.3841118e-7,0.000001225959,0.000007896687,0.000047753834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469346,0.0011508617,0.0014552701,0.00018613436,0.0017430631,0.0007712397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043435,0.0026737093,0.00095160544,0.00050913385,0.004212335,0.0012188763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024996812,0.00013820762,0.0011271467,0.036296006,0.00011815252,0.000380327,0.0027444947,0.00023374186,0.00018281405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02116025,0.00007988918,0.0004703828,0.02217049,0.00051096495,0.00026582187,0.000039185194,0.00074471475,0.000039438888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026723834,0.0000017509543,0.9696941,0.0000027026647,0.00008072779,0.0004630877,0.00028432117,0.0022686105,0.00012147316,0.00047659932,0.013512173,0.013067722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045508912,0.00060840405,0.9514845,0.000012340969,0.00001889149,0.0011791593,0.0005116507,0.00003389693,0.00003395719,0.0033101009,0.04227024,0.00008176904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04318408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075753555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03256947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040951007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009109755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980172586","doi":"10.1101/795310","title":"The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Scholarly communication; Relevance (law); Scale (ratio); Library science; History; Computer science; Political science; Geography; Business; Advertising; Publishing; Cartography","score_opus":0.3140758663651607,"score_gpt":0.4841643886087865,"score_spread":0.1700885222436258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980172586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97612673,0.0065477183,0.006570322,0.005613952,0.0017077422,0.0025989502,0.0005160441,0.000084712694,0.0002338128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686605,0.0009099565,0.0016120912,0.000118244236,0.00024521764,0.0001304775,5.8762254e-7,0.00003487094,0.00008247801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905909,0.00064174854,0.0012245642,0.001807644,0.004933714,0.0008014737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836658,0.0023605197,0.0016866946,0.003309344,0.008586581,0.00039102446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037428226,0.00035161534,0.0008700317,0.027782809,0.0005777268,0.02218798,0.010937059,0.00049503316,0.00008984785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016011726,0.00023249829,0.00027298182,0.15585154,0.00021000327,0.0015151799,0.011704891,0.0009121614,0.000036464502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006655575,0.00025694078,0.9830589,0.00015661785,0.0006674963,0.000004494723,0.00008154865,0.00007438475,0.006536637,0.0019730423,0.006744064,0.00037928406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004781128,0.000052719864,0.942119,0.00005108572,0.00021275798,1.000324e-8,0.00021986461,0.012142754,0.008032428,0.000053999127,0.03611216,0.0005250965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001978443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000651562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12806873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018463876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010980417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99628824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980178188","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00009","title":"On the topicality and research impact of special issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discipline; Scarcity; Analytics; Phenomenon; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Space (punctuation); Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.8962515934314642,"score_gpt":0.756896630519447,"score_spread":0.1393549629120172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980178188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97696364,0.0011613189,0.000015761825,0.0028595915,0.00033397344,0.00028305108,0.000012088854,0.0000035697728,0.018367028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797666,0.0003740315,0.00021735835,0.000027790658,0.00005973488,0.0000043984583,5.5149975e-8,0.0000022323895,0.0013377395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874837,0.0005727782,0.0003770923,0.0006537359,0.01037679,0.0005359303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553033,0.033658735,0.0001738687,0.0008082547,0.009880305,0.0001755234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.066081926,0.00009858468,0.0003135492,0.014890175,0.0007146019,0.0007694569,0.0019152309,0.000026339589,0.00046107656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17752698,0.00004185068,0.00009454452,0.10982886,0.0058143144,0.00050563936,0.0012427786,0.00026468228,0.00031166116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007079888,0.00009893794,0.22352855,0.00000668862,0.00003861621,0.0000018511844,0.0063033653,0.000019838742,0.0036074037,0.7323918,0.021732753,0.012199413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014077792,0.0016091287,0.7260254,0.00001731763,0.000001205148,5.4901284e-7,0.01731041,0.0006275791,0.0017404256,0.25126094,0.0011803339,0.000085975196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012625036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013006291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50249684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012276354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027083256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980909041","doi":"10.1002/pra2.50","title":"Exploring the function of citations in ancient Chinese literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Normative; Function (biology); Epistemology; History; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.1915723729450913,"score_gpt":0.4298715034228472,"score_spread":0.2382991304777559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980909041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99296486,0.000035546713,0.000033754073,0.0031124854,0.00032034586,0.0004107535,0.000011258579,0.000008605288,0.0031024027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960494,0.000037302096,0.00011996781,0.000059963677,0.0000058226615,0.000037322658,4.961779e-7,0.0000011656041,0.00013299136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960704,0.0000057400307,0.0005111105,0.00014898999,0.0030538933,0.00020988588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98842365,0.0006666231,0.00077261776,0.00015077413,0.009959797,0.000026553835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016683895,0.00005347352,0.00013088108,0.018098991,0.00021793197,0.00049575156,0.0011806854,0.000062190455,0.000002222591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051998194,0.000026851363,0.00004078468,0.1424142,0.00019103078,0.0045259986,0.00032728288,0.00013995182,0.0000060297784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011670883,0.000018228217,0.8658893,0.000018978784,0.0000038170188,1.977492e-9,0.001534685,0.000021927093,0.009324969,0.095997944,0.0003900845,0.02678838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033903625,0.00009345629,0.9495125,0.000019627125,0.0000027015435,6.7016197e-7,0.0028628383,0.002817743,0.0053921975,0.032690123,0.006218046,0.00005106627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038115704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016923359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12431521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012965278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010685578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981308303","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071","title":"Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Business; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.586007628064981,"score_gpt":0.5768068421870614,"score_spread":0.009200785877919615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981308303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98608,0.001987934,0.00039718862,0.008577469,0.00056561246,0.00026778132,0.0000185573,0.0000084182875,0.002097033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996233,0.0011381947,0.00066193304,0.00078214286,0.00023199871,0.0000023480707,0.0000011447099,0.000016524029,0.00093273784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825663,0.0019819257,0.001560044,0.00039235305,0.0072287726,0.0005802693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698366,0.009817259,0.0011198933,0.0005388342,0.0009259174,0.0006144507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07693311,0.00017257904,0.0004379715,0.021675637,0.00011510109,0.002167461,0.005583235,0.00044624897,0.00031022623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018168142,0.00009597199,0.00008560489,0.037663165,0.00021282602,0.020877028,0.0008246407,0.0049161273,0.00003401636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110947214,0.000045189787,0.96635365,0.0000049152527,0.000012570899,0.000009906228,0.0024068533,0.00006818322,0.0014812114,0.004700064,0.008522986,0.016283495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094986794,0.0003855586,0.9272992,0.000047315603,0.000010925506,0.00007631391,0.009791281,0.0010907435,0.0003070541,0.05641089,0.003488936,0.00014191883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021235095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015205205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058764968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012753888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079200516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981403469","doi":"10.1177/2059799119884273","title":"A new innovative method to measure the demographic representation of scientists via Google Scholar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methodological Innovations","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Centre for Disease Control; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Census; Globe; Citation; Underrepresented Minority; Higher education; Population; Categorization; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Institution; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Geography; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Information retrieval; Law","score_opus":0.848374927255399,"score_gpt":0.6570818343428702,"score_spread":0.19129309291252883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981403469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18057355,0.000090673595,0.80904377,0.004768869,0.00047977237,0.00075289863,0.000017881735,0.000028412056,0.0042441534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4383199,0.0000030932765,0.55865055,0.00090356666,0.00005435963,0.000027701064,0.000006047387,0.000008545784,0.0020262562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482776,0.004298744,0.0015466892,0.001150588,0.0075703403,0.00060588005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94182014,0.035563484,0.0009797602,0.0021849878,0.019046172,0.00040546735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104681276,0.00018293332,0.00055092666,0.0298404,0.00043300696,0.0009368213,0.0028133194,0.00018532782,0.001450127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17761007,0.00010077755,0.00017564833,0.5185353,0.00019490356,0.0006159458,0.00095755217,0.0007173429,0.00039645645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081368074,0.000120882025,0.12435957,0.0000038116193,0.000057407873,0.0000015758075,0.00025252913,0.0003844435,0.15109557,0.10795442,0.015265962,0.60042244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004730076,0.0004093845,0.7374245,0.0000116346555,0.000012403182,0.000008438201,0.00049480144,0.0012552579,0.019680649,0.20619462,0.03380535,0.00022992326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013529185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009320339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61306494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056068046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028677535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982303973","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.05","title":"Trends and Cycles in the Publication of Solo Papers in Business and Economics Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Competition (biology); Publication; Economics; Publishing; Marketing; Political science; Library science; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.351635277265701,"score_gpt":0.47927893181120435,"score_spread":0.12764365454550336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982303973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95591396,0.0020110132,0.000017381115,0.035401452,0.0001793672,0.000053909353,0.0000040323957,8.4588453e-7,0.006418034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974744,0.0016501625,0.0004213217,0.00027631162,0.000056000725,5.861848e-7,4.6515632e-7,0.0000042857437,0.00011646903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947567,0.00035232745,0.0012569913,0.0002397332,0.0031337831,0.00026049602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103296,0.003257003,0.001147588,0.0002874755,0.004098883,0.00017609414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07500159,0.00008124484,0.00032322056,0.058203477,0.000067018605,0.057176836,0.0019032,0.00013096447,0.00008983826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068326645,0.00004723495,0.00005875444,0.06296695,0.00007355121,0.04688539,0.00030666278,0.0009668356,0.0000014173867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017854603,0.000042263935,0.76181865,0.0000034948212,0.0000050703325,0.0000031760246,0.00040747877,0.000041989144,0.0005537916,0.0007412535,0.0006593351,0.23570563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066605734,0.000059846054,0.9861735,0.00003287544,0.0000023627188,0.00007700568,0.0018956109,0.00041590602,0.000018361387,0.0035947894,0.0070093996,0.000054261967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007792405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066628694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23565137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007357201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000193474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982344414","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.03","title":"Understanding Australian Academic Authors in the Humanities and Social Sciences Their Publishing Experiences, Values, and Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Social science; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8168404902069049,"score_gpt":0.5239685361619547,"score_spread":0.29287195404495014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982344414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95297307,0.0034028823,0.00017395674,0.037652202,0.00055678276,0.0001484113,0.0000053557524,0.000007257917,0.0050800685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800754,0.00024647004,0.0003414855,0.0006196984,0.00031265712,0.0000021697322,3.3702264e-7,0.000007854328,0.0004617764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98736393,0.0009949734,0.0010401325,0.0005636288,0.009382386,0.00065495697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060345,0.0056617474,0.0009723223,0.00023279636,0.0023778263,0.0001518817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12019157,0.0001793685,0.0003952062,0.029854633,0.0014566964,0.3168559,0.0045903036,0.00029541663,0.0000914295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05396533,0.000099883495,0.00011085819,0.04007465,0.000991445,0.1525619,0.0007762882,0.00364417,0.0000020469172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044973844,0.00007192965,0.51687473,0.000017998202,0.00003380703,0.000030114023,0.36455187,0.000018971192,0.0007438198,0.06756373,0.037360474,0.012687554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000477548,0.0001885718,0.12357109,0.000050062787,0.0000046488863,0.000120901175,0.81207377,0.00022718776,0.000019679086,0.054851424,0.008266755,0.00014833367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009971058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001612024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44752192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033568335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043893844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982350538","doi":"10.7717/peerj.7850","title":"Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: the example of ophthalmology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Computer science; Optometry; Ophthalmology; Data science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6882823401631499,"score_gpt":0.5873470387454104,"score_spread":0.10093530141773954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982350538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895952,0.00012969677,0.00032809924,0.0024539516,0.0006951448,0.00040867744,0.000017513095,0.000006684428,0.006365055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943319,0.0000017842443,0.00021709004,0.00011668287,0.000020691532,0.0000144036785,0.0000013912552,0.0000056891,0.005290389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921392,0.0004203311,0.0007722057,0.0007644642,0.0053227595,0.00058099726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995703,0.006482263,0.00019360051,0.0015181012,0.0016212697,0.0002277334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03687222,0.00009968697,0.00031551972,0.027042257,0.0001181594,0.0019161155,0.0041904515,0.000057025092,0.0030509387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026060909,0.000057582325,0.00009300267,0.1867798,0.00023178675,0.00048784842,0.0016449485,0.00019619476,0.0016387849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044813754,0.00014749933,0.95484203,0.0000064278597,0.000003681561,0.000010603779,0.0005383465,0.00033471978,0.00851568,0.001133225,0.006929059,0.027493922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026742858,0.00011250898,0.9689316,0.0000064708693,0.0000012036878,0.000012765968,0.0003481604,0.0018779532,0.003670551,0.010232547,0.014436519,0.0001022546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017250627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002038488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15973754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000626612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001647816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982640339","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.02","title":"Fifty Years of <i>JSP</i>: Golden Anniversary Compilation, compiled and edited by Mary Lui and Robert Brown","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; History; Classics; Library science; Art history; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.17878415953494883,"score_gpt":0.4211352943766775,"score_spread":0.24235113484172868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982640339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873369,0.004963651,0.00052729435,0.0034190551,0.0006954324,0.00013339805,0.00007772439,0.0000061303454,0.0028404398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955665,0.00054925575,0.0022639323,0.00033630143,0.00014875567,2.760647e-7,0.000007717336,0.000011068784,0.0011161896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910604,0.00029893426,0.0010485877,0.00036505013,0.006906844,0.00032019385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840326,0.0034543935,0.0010527112,0.00033908142,0.006241718,0.0005088567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024963142,0.00012253123,0.0004767154,0.020007333,0.00012631596,0.032092735,0.0017383166,0.00019929743,0.0002157566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026338972,0.00009674621,0.00010873865,0.031367827,0.00013970121,0.053668704,0.0007453777,0.0011369567,0.000010490249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064497624,0.00007058264,0.7107746,0.000011162419,0.000038255333,0.000014277505,0.00024756344,0.000019081277,0.0061338255,0.00010269035,0.23645315,0.046070334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015214654,0.00027279448,0.9003911,0.000058722868,0.000013251475,0.000070980255,0.00072925224,0.0011541697,0.00015119434,0.0013073641,0.09419139,0.00013831614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008630002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002887858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18961653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007615314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019116323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911001},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2983185127","doi":"10.7554/elife.34311.009","title":"Author response: Donated chemical probes for open science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Structural Genomics Consortium; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Chemical biology; Computational biology; Data science; Biology; Computer science; Mathematics; Genetics; Statistics","score_opus":0.7820483469065401,"score_gpt":0.6845863826340793,"score_spread":0.09746196427246079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983185127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020617181,0.032564953,0.0063689393,0.8121819,0.016264068,0.016223917,0.003248224,0.00022026758,0.11086602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007377874,0.00036180328,0.014426338,0.0030903465,0.00039466057,0.0004319995,0.00008732658,0.000041648636,0.9804281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96530557,0.00049827027,0.0018657125,0.0034696185,0.027156662,0.0017041597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9305063,0.01878769,0.0010307372,0.00416517,0.043920793,0.0015893298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23502418,0.00047943363,0.0013833552,0.0850166,0.00082359195,0.015516982,0.043917656,0.0005073551,0.009187617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5052307,0.00028644782,0.0004256395,0.37196526,0.0019775373,0.0012059757,0.015358948,0.00063119706,0.0019360841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016669997,0.00010060355,0.000022420121,0.00010761022,0.000011478894,0.0000031343718,0.00001104706,6.159152e-8,0.00065662724,0.00033851695,0.945641,0.052940793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000395404,0.0003356175,0.00021361762,0.00037339106,0.000020122878,0.000011489978,0.00002033947,0.00060979824,0.0049180146,0.0049857018,0.9876549,0.00046157406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015343737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022320984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052267674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074155177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983983302","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03280-z","title":"Deep and narrow impact: introducing location filtered citation counting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Information retrieval; Biomedicine; Data science; Citation analysis; Rank (graph theory); Scientometrics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.35873592871164445,"score_gpt":0.5378950683652745,"score_spread":0.17915913965363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983983302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97313267,0.0017678342,0.018835401,0.00041541195,0.0014547448,0.00041082414,0.000010813049,0.000044356133,0.003927924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495274,0.000052429314,0.0026825867,0.00011874248,0.0001152168,0.0000058015557,0.00001169599,0.00001579531,0.0020450107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842342,0.0001961241,0.00078924804,0.0012485418,0.012654933,0.0008769259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98552126,0.0048628603,0.0004822576,0.0010471602,0.0074839443,0.00060251873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040652663,0.000207943,0.00035333412,0.1596791,0.00036914318,0.0056213946,0.0016153719,0.0001358539,0.0008115205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10507772,0.00015373042,0.00011269413,0.5284157,0.00016888215,0.001811574,0.00064118876,0.00030125337,0.0011157828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002043699,0.000085517815,0.7539529,0.000023659619,0.000012040391,0.0000027864485,0.0007535608,0.004075868,0.0037066701,0.0007453745,0.004320845,0.23230031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069819,0.00024723847,0.7247403,0.000011522019,0.000006542648,0.000013669928,0.00077583024,0.26633137,0.0005827675,0.0024133513,0.0038763005,0.00030287562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103794446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001014519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3687366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035847008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024091348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984452956","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/32/10/10","title":"Life as a new Nobel laureate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Physicist; Art history; Physics; Art; Theoretical physics; Literature","score_opus":0.6159426562745316,"score_gpt":0.5836635494568094,"score_spread":0.03227910681772217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984452956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3627962,0.0008101197,0.0040383325,0.015296971,0.0020242813,0.0005996864,0.000022579741,0.00010992832,0.6143019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7837515,0.000028080034,0.00041585954,0.0029609217,0.00041830278,0.0000039626275,0.000003020844,0.000016950045,0.21240139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155414,0.00008220631,0.00039544326,0.0006739794,0.006721496,0.00057274936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390966,0.0020897465,0.00016774752,0.0010605053,0.00095617597,0.0018161755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004017342,0.00015016383,0.0003086007,0.016506469,0.0001093502,0.0018665615,0.0020566022,0.000040875748,0.0042828238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021347273,0.00010644612,0.00018894307,0.17922175,0.000051786454,0.0006061769,0.00062232965,0.00027194977,0.0324948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002372864,0.00012255319,0.12047264,0.000003287421,0.000021344764,0.0000057290204,0.000104219915,0.00013813155,0.0007455171,0.038843334,0.6929053,0.14661421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082064135,0.00011873643,0.013170056,0.000011153025,0.0000066356706,0.0000014344118,0.00008023507,0.005990772,0.0022887334,0.2352833,0.741893,0.00033527325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034576416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026768945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4209553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005197025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010224227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984616697","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2019-0589","title":"Looking back on 90 years of the <i>Canadian Journal of Physics</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Library science","score_opus":0.29760739385943324,"score_gpt":0.44439472771155336,"score_spread":0.14678733385212012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984616697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865829,0.00045450518,0.00039321082,0.000866255,0.0029298407,0.0001365133,0.00006908942,5.9966357e-7,0.008567121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983931,0.000015642116,0.00016642982,0.00030769012,0.00046144714,1.09370234e-7,2.8977925e-7,0.000014702426,0.0006405997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413854,0.0001918128,0.0008866922,0.00018030095,0.004044561,0.00055806496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164635,0.001008793,0.0012787824,0.00057317666,0.0041108495,0.0013820692],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006430117,0.00012910692,0.0004458122,0.009886363,0.0001904151,0.0008972984,0.0031211332,0.000094031035,0.0004754821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004131025,0.00008687012,0.00046888317,0.036986444,0.0003012238,0.0005339484,0.000057603665,0.0007285074,0.00019054417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003426437,0.00010583985,0.4666334,0.000025067799,0.00017545721,0.000168163,0.0019624552,0.0070725484,0.002209977,0.014434402,0.11154424,0.39563417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033189019,0.0019243575,0.4939459,0.0007130609,0.00009407725,0.00023470492,0.0018113448,0.0011462619,0.025440954,0.109959304,0.36061284,0.0007983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010805085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029331887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39483586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037360864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008549678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985457196","doi":"10.1111/caje.12460","title":"Social connections and editorship in economics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7290401826152794,"score_gpt":0.37905386183735806,"score_spread":0.3499863207779213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985457196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741933,0.0002087313,0.000047417412,0.022463644,0.0017616545,0.00014081843,0.00011933943,0.0000026407108,0.0010624736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996068,0.00019122592,0.00015050704,0.000989059,0.002439813,0.000003912757,0.000002409872,0.000022092669,0.00013295416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723184,0.00013385173,0.0012929597,0.0005223056,0.000018463295,0.0008005746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366844,0.0012813443,0.0006316008,0.0002432199,0.0007044447,0.0034709491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056888596,0.00019540684,0.00065352063,0.017372314,0.0002493566,0.0012381747,0.0013699248,0.00021399572,0.00023344316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090012355,0.00020825556,0.00018947308,0.007447719,0.00025455127,0.0008840649,0.00008464357,0.0005352654,0.000037242175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018223915,0.000038870417,0.3743543,0.000026376561,0.00014476012,0.00035996403,0.006767933,0.006177751,0.000033634195,0.49950173,0.025877386,0.08653504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023181918,0.0008926793,0.06659672,0.00002448463,0.000025105077,0.00036852917,0.0043327296,0.021261467,0.000115840034,0.50488067,0.39829847,0.00088514027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89161783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012134977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028402272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987347589","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3163679","title":"Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Citations in Mathematics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geographical distance; Similarity (geometry); Citation; Institution; Logit; Economic geography; Control (management); Subject matter; Interpersonal ties; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Economics; Econometrics; Demography; Management; Computer science; Law; Population","score_opus":0.36140437967926564,"score_gpt":0.5295783810219614,"score_spread":0.16817400134269578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987347589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95480317,0.027207568,0.015451482,0.0006215244,0.00028376887,0.0001105233,0.00000669498,0.000009873097,0.0015054181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98051447,0.016474009,0.0018018374,0.000017826349,0.00022029625,0.0000037098514,6.529623e-7,0.000008780752,0.00095841667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436766,0.00023245734,0.00061389623,0.00039489224,0.002679046,0.0017120746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934679,0.004037984,0.00018956381,0.00036260852,0.0017039501,0.0002379572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030018944,0.00012275341,0.0002293099,0.027750008,0.00033252314,0.0015003985,0.0013601349,0.00008739578,0.00016419479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01957602,0.0000857069,0.00009099403,0.0691633,0.00020997034,0.0008236316,0.0002948593,0.0011190554,0.00024970702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059306494,0.00047220598,0.49617103,0.000008346691,0.00011655505,0.000014581043,0.004963475,0.000011185053,0.0013760228,0.040840175,0.0026527732,0.45331433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003924224,0.00038011043,0.092143126,0.00007563661,0.0000078541725,0.0000649795,0.0036365606,0.0070941504,0.0000634098,0.8948323,0.0011589433,0.0001504991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024893734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050673652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000347623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016986326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987668259","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03291-w","title":"Evaluating medical conferences: the emerging need for a quality metric","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Metric (unit); Publishing; Observational study; Computer science; Library science; Ranking (information retrieval); Political science; Medicine; Business; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8632070423881478,"score_gpt":0.7154768984215607,"score_spread":0.14773014396658712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987668259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9001105,0.0022637183,0.061688304,0.0062394417,0.0057880296,0.0021358018,0.00008964359,0.000100133155,0.021584466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903953,0.00010061093,0.0031072923,0.00080921926,0.00020031589,0.000067092806,0.000009476813,0.000020811,0.005289852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94184977,0.0010309861,0.001922253,0.0017154092,0.051814627,0.0016669576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85030746,0.11738067,0.001814633,0.004292361,0.023896141,0.0023087128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25881523,0.00029724822,0.000694419,0.1489679,0.0008757854,0.005164391,0.008702159,0.00026744057,0.0037286726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5399934,0.00016397025,0.0004924886,0.63241637,0.00042524864,0.0007880301,0.0017442633,0.0006269276,0.0013563843],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057222805,0.0002451529,0.288818,0.000030487234,0.000047020792,0.0000025957752,0.00042357654,0.0004342368,0.00041838916,0.023080721,0.013487978,0.6729546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004200752,0.0011559937,0.2884158,0.000039336097,0.000038644233,0.000016942202,0.0052769696,0.4901171,0.00079091394,0.03399798,0.17495292,0.0009966604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022195427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024696876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67195797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002707261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017491643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994212},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2989385916","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12860","title":"CITATIONS AND INCENTIVES IN ACADEMIC CONTESTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Incentive; Index (typography); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Microeconomics; Rent-seeking; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6736258481036862,"score_gpt":0.6097729619107982,"score_spread":0.06385288619288798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989385916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99073875,0.00056405924,0.00007873907,0.0006374855,0.0014070496,0.00017522837,0.000008675992,0.0000074938944,0.006382517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746096,0.00020044335,0.00011292947,0.00014397077,0.000102573,0.0000060844436,0.0000013836444,0.000004664073,0.0019670124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800456,0.000096753196,0.00045503888,0.00047632525,0.00067324104,0.0002940585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963132,0.0029939853,0.00011737458,0.0002994091,0.00014017733,0.00013581672],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008066542,0.00007202257,0.00018986624,0.020542258,0.000048725153,0.0004617351,0.00070909265,0.00008586767,0.00068381487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041150358,0.000059082395,0.000034747998,0.013888802,0.00015993866,0.0007154103,0.00034309182,0.00022579585,0.0027862666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007737116,0.000011366005,0.9670561,0.00000147865,0.0000028022778,0.0000013049664,0.0006205795,0.000060890376,0.0002752582,0.005054461,0.0052611884,0.021646854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004931904,0.000038498376,0.9652033,0.000006096611,5.439413e-7,0.0000024534831,0.0015163884,0.005589555,0.000101771584,0.014450804,0.012495969,0.00010142553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042987907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024974723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021545429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001186185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010989039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989484692","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x","title":"Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Turun Yliopisto","keywords":"Altmetrics; Discipline; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Social media; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.838152280754456,"score_gpt":0.6455667087672443,"score_spread":0.1925855719872117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989484692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955313,0.0008126932,0.00020764513,0.0013037829,0.0004433122,0.0009106401,0.00006028094,0.000006311641,0.0007239901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892265,0.00014185451,0.00034326222,0.00006284908,0.000023143297,0.000008554824,0.0000015016543,0.000013897187,0.00048227905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97376555,0.0024317822,0.0014986485,0.0010111089,0.020212078,0.0010808457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783849,0.008512352,0.0012215439,0.0017518249,0.009483315,0.00064602785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108231656,0.0002111957,0.0006495731,0.26909086,0.0003236766,0.007054362,0.011431104,0.00019942832,0.00043864132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043196917,0.0001450322,0.00019400302,0.61527854,0.00093990914,0.0059272307,0.0033438117,0.00092968275,0.000024694027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000714087,0.0004190861,0.9661016,0.000020500667,0.000007404975,0.0000059402514,0.0014834232,0.003067941,0.007809614,0.00016598376,0.0003029797,0.020544104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010863772,0.00021378273,0.93484783,0.00011935488,0.0000043483183,0.0000016582044,0.008116978,0.019445434,0.029963762,0.005993111,0.00004977768,0.00015761389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004475062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009897391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34618768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096834963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019846612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939764},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2989988376","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421","title":"Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; European Commission","keywords":"Peer review; Reputation; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Specialty; Prestige; Publishing; Medicine; Medical education; Social science; Sociology; Family medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.7235323662160645,"score_gpt":0.7043026568809326,"score_spread":0.019229709335131906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989988376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97540563,0.0011752802,0.000039340946,0.014699175,0.0008871758,0.0034010843,0.000017785702,0.0000014513524,0.0043730936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977416,0.00023505457,0.000153692,0.00009300892,0.00033803657,0.000046668334,2.5014873e-7,0.0000057472575,0.0013859773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98319846,0.0028128673,0.0009771436,0.00043337178,0.012273084,0.00030509557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98179436,0.01244204,0.00070110854,0.00070140307,0.0040677763,0.00029331076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19015835,0.000106279396,0.0004712605,0.016869623,0.00014989202,0.0026870333,0.0030282063,0.000055404165,0.0013870776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12191805,0.00004850671,0.000086669475,0.04872474,0.00022658556,0.00057194114,0.001208204,0.000509271,0.00011996735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065353705,0.0022371265,0.1589885,0.000019018085,0.00015060553,0.000068781344,0.36750212,0.000009895216,0.0002826509,0.0018275153,0.41130322,0.056957018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001181848,0.001262838,0.093048796,0.00015640058,0.0000048425777,0.000016542872,0.88129395,0.00015773997,0.000012865371,0.0046795886,0.018065786,0.0001188199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008285019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019791481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5137918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072750525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003203499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990936998","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.oa.16.00003","title":"Introducing JBJS Open Access","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"JBJS Open Access","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Mandate; Editorial board; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.7193090262193096,"score_gpt":0.7295967187681344,"score_spread":0.010287692548824778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990936998","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043273738,0.0006443825,0.0013417457,0.004357314,0.836694,0.0031341952,0.0012623916,0.000062451,0.15207076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020977817,0.0020079021,0.00080589595,0.0005740509,0.8190943,0.0005525036,0.00027225984,0.00020502819,0.1743903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9573551,0.0012859594,0.0029654854,0.005497311,0.030554095,0.002342083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9355463,0.03457361,0.003143059,0.007914095,0.017004097,0.0018188856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07567778,0.00095448823,0.0024844965,0.07649464,0.0014048073,0.42548352,0.24827607,0.0015419625,0.020645438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25432402,0.0005908153,0.0004492132,0.21543148,0.00046328516,0.04220549,0.23541124,0.0022970345,0.00539354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001499605,0.00016988594,0.0030677712,0.000024272236,0.00007166966,0.000055531287,0.000027478494,0.0000074541217,0.000019548785,0.0001718599,0.85771877,0.13851579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016329725,0.00012447107,0.0023067996,0.00017563137,0.000028990331,0.0000024943006,0.00004137087,0.00008981635,0.00029634588,0.013943315,0.9803507,0.001007136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008471761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008176752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.383278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000952559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005503834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992890322","doi":"10.29173/jchla29389","title":"An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Health professionals; Publication; Public relations; Work (physics); Medical education; Psychology; Health care; Political science; Medicine; Business; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.07273604979052904,"score_gpt":0.4722611424672414,"score_spread":0.3995250926767123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992890322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518875,0.007491731,0.00019933871,0.036986154,0.0027078716,0.0004132762,0.00017720176,0.000005123778,0.00013179316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98502517,0.00191013,0.0016207848,0.009886167,0.0004453833,0.000004652653,0.000003922706,0.000024103525,0.0010796989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760961,0.012116813,0.0027711117,0.0003055374,0.0073544513,0.0013560188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97381514,0.010005943,0.007169931,0.00040794283,0.005916819,0.002684199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108238995,0.00021766522,0.0007930719,0.011743678,0.0009097667,0.0027838645,0.0022025986,0.00042116435,0.00036902068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07955814,0.00016290811,0.00021144089,0.019269984,0.00003326592,0.0021284637,0.00013087667,0.0015897985,0.000003490455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001543662,0.000111314424,0.77714884,0.000022908625,0.000036756966,0.000011406981,0.0018536658,0.0010297927,0.00016118123,0.000088055844,0.21336603,0.0060156872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066128065,0.00021110171,0.9059565,0.00034975648,0.000005184849,0.00012215764,0.0018456926,0.0004792369,0.00015393457,0.0022536428,0.087801404,0.00016012746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1524373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32695332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2227726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044488713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2672613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945736},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2993168401","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2012-065","title":"Evaluating the Relationship between Pay and Research Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from Ontario Universities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Productivity; Panel data; Construct (python library); Set (abstract data type); Demographic economics; Public sector; Empirical evidence; Accounting; Economics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Labour economics; Econometrics; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.950732684546332,"score_gpt":0.6520624583787293,"score_spread":0.29867022616760264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993168401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90220916,0.00026697744,0.0001598698,0.09291417,0.00012637784,0.00024787462,0.00021314602,0.000011236261,0.0038511518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98490494,0.000009801005,0.0002592197,0.00019723753,0.0006403314,0.0000054804163,0.000034363486,0.000008946636,0.013939675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892753,0.0021068053,0.0003642373,0.0010517599,0.006138985,0.0010629346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79036015,0.18388759,0.0005000896,0.011035266,0.008671265,0.0055456534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08483786,0.00012031226,0.00020568883,0.038222384,0.0018954274,0.005597881,0.0054827686,0.000117458694,0.00024673063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36888087,0.00007257781,0.000032185697,0.086106196,0.00070877967,0.0023359824,0.0019240044,0.00088343973,0.00019341543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018439143,0.0000035466946,0.8415542,0.0000013568861,0.0000073315096,0.0000013137902,0.0010258307,0.0000012057292,0.0000051938273,0.0068858233,0.009759794,0.14075251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008496696,0.000054875967,0.84218806,0.000010518953,0.000003929132,0.0000017229947,0.0006057396,0.0012365676,0.0000022298514,0.029725282,0.12599503,0.00009105077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95026225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9086566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.284043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019623123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030011207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994083704","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2019.2047","title":"Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, <i>h</i> -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Diversity (politics); Index (typography); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.36235361469056565,"score_gpt":0.45546837601989854,"score_spread":0.09311476132933288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994083704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881807,0.0043294267,0.000025160749,0.006700316,0.00022056725,0.000249543,0.000027969265,0.000009106172,0.00025722265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759895,0.0018017755,0.0001488014,0.00022177087,0.00010315852,0.0000019583683,1.0845063e-7,0.0000034853751,0.0001199675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515873,0.00010444252,0.00052210066,0.00059738714,0.0030082427,0.0006090926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403113,0.0033933895,0.0011349946,0.00012332379,0.0010244715,0.000292661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021446034,0.00022951762,0.00048811603,0.00094173703,0.0008629585,0.001490095,0.003644454,0.0005714251,0.0000622954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008370881,0.000071666,0.00039048644,0.021444969,0.004040343,0.00051537674,0.0013345847,0.0014117956,9.020642e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010718969,0.000012356392,0.9875961,0.000008914419,0.000019405885,3.922627e-8,0.00114327,0.000009233892,0.004812238,0.0006223825,0.0018496227,0.003915722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019090764,0.00035007828,0.92680067,0.000053086023,0.000006686452,0.000016268876,0.037389573,0.0046851085,0.0027746262,0.026456652,0.0010976061,0.00017875481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024233985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.394504e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06079544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005221956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013171177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994214050","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31808-2","title":"Gender bias in CIHR Foundation grant awarding","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Lancet","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Gender and Health; St. Michael's Hospital; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Political science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8374126215288672,"score_gpt":0.5756409761241855,"score_spread":0.2617716454046817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994214050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020942742,0.00079415063,0.0013894002,0.93367255,0.003433754,0.0006861803,0.00010051744,0.000042530133,0.038938202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18409431,0.0010393622,0.00056947756,0.7710169,0.015761431,0.000053471093,0.00019502894,0.000078532576,0.02719151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987057,0.00075193495,0.0007038835,0.00081057573,0.00974784,0.0009287784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759437,0.009113221,0.00037447992,0.0020276643,0.0008362526,0.00005403843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032517027,0.00021899275,0.0007699973,0.036173962,0.00015706096,0.003470252,0.0052881935,0.00040130908,0.0008359791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020372119,0.00011479413,0.00018813695,0.094244234,0.00012175509,0.00031018312,0.0007834139,0.0020106598,0.0043674344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079627125,0.000009124668,0.020020505,0.000015608584,0.000010780442,0.000037784885,0.00009143885,0.000028477138,0.000017015936,0.00010418347,0.96550065,0.014156459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038063864,0.00002338298,0.028058933,0.000017486622,0.0000044619173,0.000006766667,0.00004404474,0.0014443549,0.0000094291845,0.009463915,0.96037406,0.00017253026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018109282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016041451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16315158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001883667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022506299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994940827","doi":"10.29024/joa.21","title":"What Is Societal Impact and Where Do Altmetrics Fit into the Equation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Social impact; Meaning (existential); Political science; Impact assessment; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Social science; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.4838761285065922,"score_gpt":0.5875435062790783,"score_spread":0.10366737777248608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994940827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90591985,0.081913315,0.0024627584,0.0058716293,0.0028018765,0.0003118412,0.000012506223,0.000007237428,0.00069901074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958113,0.036521755,0.0018784985,0.0004851607,0.00032391897,0.0000013475271,5.5497077e-7,0.000022676204,0.0026530656],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825686,0.0003636328,0.0015202386,0.0005300632,0.014368748,0.0006486803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720294,0.016332788,0.0016709404,0.0009531924,0.008291312,0.0007223593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039182276,0.00025975183,0.00064457086,0.060418893,0.0003609494,0.009691424,0.0029586563,0.00022845823,0.0012803448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03419379,0.00013250555,0.0006142627,0.24210107,0.00019979109,0.003543092,0.0007367652,0.0009101572,0.00039653262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006070076,0.00021117584,0.28457084,0.000017332319,0.00015993362,0.00002425696,0.0020829148,0.00031651784,0.00016398705,0.00030085942,0.07338707,0.6387044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004744637,0.0051836628,0.4153819,0.00014178653,0.00016126136,0.00050023914,0.020337898,0.03319867,0.0008643831,0.04982114,0.4685871,0.0010773157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050140712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037216125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63762707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036677913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006149716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995045919","doi":"10.21810/pop.2019.009","title":"Building and Supporting Humanities-Based University–industry Partnerships: View from the Academics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Engaged scholarship; Public relations; Promotion (chess); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.8787113822494896,"score_gpt":0.5958663074063777,"score_spread":0.28284507484311194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995045919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98095065,0.0005535075,0.00031287025,0.008653224,0.0004036134,0.0005551111,0.00005916291,0.000033240216,0.008478594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941776,0.000029098901,0.00033655748,0.0018894213,0.000092972165,0.0000093280705,0.000006547923,0.000016435391,0.0034420437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254423,0.0012235623,0.00067494245,0.0009005607,0.0036673865,0.0009892927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882641,0.008757623,0.0004521702,0.0010675418,0.0008596992,0.00059889694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037919134,0.00019209232,0.00039087443,0.0052553955,0.0006488992,0.0059180562,0.005090822,0.00030359675,0.004044814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017307077,0.00013164696,0.000095422176,0.030836679,0.0003438672,0.001891156,0.002507114,0.0010414523,0.00044131954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023668761,0.000079649384,0.90234685,0.0000070179544,0.000038950064,0.000013730756,0.00028555084,0.000022457527,0.00019113076,0.02758016,0.02212108,0.047289774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084102753,0.00007774014,0.10468468,0.00003076937,0.000023120618,0.0000019266067,0.004073806,0.012027553,0.00023183368,0.0039885375,0.8736884,0.000330584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034559847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008279696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015696585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007287238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99686563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995085135","doi":"10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w","title":"Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Inclusion (mineral); Public health; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Political science; Public relations; Nursing; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.5707412540395201,"score_gpt":0.6020424589318087,"score_spread":0.0313012048922886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995085135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1966661,0.018019473,0.0037305567,0.7757397,0.004657441,0.00034035652,0.00023670343,0.000005489614,0.0006041599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6480498,0.012047023,0.006154401,0.32961184,0.003303234,0.0000029725431,0.000020880361,0.0000702857,0.000739596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647289,0.0015284485,0.0044263545,0.0006207561,0.027744463,0.0009510806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676091,0.008048277,0.0059979856,0.00048215452,0.017313642,0.0005488616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10530159,0.0002577293,0.0010818322,0.14970173,0.00018122507,0.0023988464,0.004752949,0.00052417675,0.00033780478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11236408,0.00019620835,0.00029903292,0.048561744,0.00012656317,0.0026934042,0.0030353775,0.003916739,0.000012071558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667119,0.00008283124,0.20549546,0.00008657354,0.00011487676,0.000214537,0.0013328481,0.000057693193,0.000095554205,0.000020413023,0.44008303,0.3523995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015334871,0.00047017538,0.0523088,0.0008201049,0.000006424876,0.00030370633,0.0007403984,0.0015256887,0.00006303992,0.0022510171,0.93969285,0.00028432035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029482198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022778531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4996098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017462655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005447929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995379720","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2017-031","title":"Transparency in Peer Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.848945792683576,"score_gpt":0.6931156795503436,"score_spread":0.15583011313323236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995379720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10735878,0.15930848,0.00009443898,0.61236113,0.00090085034,0.00048817633,0.000025850542,0.0000016364208,0.11946066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583129,0.037263572,0.00036111544,0.0003211189,0.00009821133,0.0000023189177,2.6576254e-7,0.0000063780726,0.0036341073],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867104,0.0008704959,0.0007913987,0.00029373862,0.010602495,0.0007314544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96207255,0.009292757,0.00061960076,0.0011413903,0.02455014,0.0023235693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14995973,0.000081798455,0.00033816718,0.025707975,0.0008493003,0.003981107,0.0031234436,0.00008734793,0.00046367338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5486439,0.00005406433,0.000084114996,0.019362751,0.0005879326,0.001804131,0.00014813054,0.0012470775,0.000086816595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000587302,0.00013884252,0.13846456,0.00015881473,0.000040956857,0.003068665,0.00090996723,0.0000019672284,0.00008311562,0.0014754151,0.29075056,0.5648484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048274596,0.00037638217,0.20539655,0.00059657276,0.000013006265,0.00021265526,0.0013043053,0.00005159157,0.000030512336,0.0060729473,0.78535366,0.00010909317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00802749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086051505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031853714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996436809","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0226727","title":"Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: A qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Research Foundation; Leverhulme Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Gratitude; Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Space (punctuation); Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8034167113490062,"score_gpt":0.5691937306555053,"score_spread":0.2342229806935009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996436809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99480885,0.002663158,0.000043189186,0.00048870477,0.00029051246,0.0009386145,0.000083149775,0.0000066773387,0.0006771366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917684,0.00038151845,0.00062072487,0.000062115614,0.000019204406,0.00005011911,0.000014706471,0.000008678889,0.0070745246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898565,0.0009409863,0.0016407006,0.0011401165,0.005819502,0.0006022169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98451155,0.0036348833,0.00080134266,0.0012226751,0.009505467,0.00032405258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04148742,0.00019232354,0.001188606,0.07042326,0.00007743265,0.0014626564,0.0014525701,0.00007998318,0.0063354564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14130959,0.00013959687,0.00016365937,0.19429703,0.00026830132,0.0009355769,0.00090764434,0.00023887731,0.0027225357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058763497,0.0026964007,0.97582394,0.00009361642,0.0002437864,0.0000020696716,0.005029556,0.0000065052136,0.006179759,0.000019663798,0.0045641046,0.005281816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017452275,0.00016161014,0.9693669,0.00034234542,0.00017572229,4.094008e-8,0.008854282,0.011417393,0.0060803564,0.00062865677,0.0009513455,0.0002761106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006922964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017054785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12387378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018226475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000990647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996663025","doi":"10.18438/eblip29623","title":"Library Supported Open Access Funds: Criteria, Impact, and Viability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Business; Demographics; Impact factor; Index (typography); Accounting; Library science; Computer science; Finance; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.36803992851377104,"score_gpt":0.5709500403995352,"score_spread":0.2029101118857642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996663025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7862416,0.0015845853,0.0018776816,0.12599577,0.0006485374,0.002195588,0.00021750749,0.00015060583,0.081088156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592661,0.0018070099,0.0030997584,0.0339259,0.00004721432,0.000025763338,0.00006714116,0.000010980705,0.0017501308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949669,0.0007156294,0.0009122368,0.00050639955,0.0025163,0.00038252503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787181,0.018626131,0.00067611795,0.0009051232,0.0004933007,0.00058124115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010860966,0.00018044142,0.00030080814,0.010725708,0.00025359407,0.04737548,0.003238077,0.000119737706,0.015489162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034999263,0.00012515378,0.000062377665,0.04126616,0.00012932236,0.7219777,0.0042504855,0.0003157503,0.00046297637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001785724,0.00019150815,0.68519336,0.00015357479,0.000032503733,0.000010758798,0.00022537356,0.00005730108,0.0001980171,0.017597225,0.123617485,0.17093715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048088015,0.00030009562,0.42092678,0.00004641343,0.000007011286,0.000018073066,0.00036409145,0.013507563,0.00083565636,0.0017005525,0.5616194,0.00019349476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034310684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.505399e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67460227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014744096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007554255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997223030","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919000799","title":"Open Access and Academic Journals in Canada: A Political Science Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Politics; Scholarly communication; Political science; Publication; Public relations; Research council; Library science; Work (physics); Revenue; Public administration; Sociology; Publishing; Business; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.6166086716854868,"score_gpt":0.6363500773005246,"score_spread":0.019741405615037788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997223030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587146,0.0003278027,0.000051402065,0.021222554,0.0007953509,0.00021698733,0.000027295426,9.900341e-7,0.018642992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979186,0.000012686973,0.00016994767,0.0016746914,0.00008974583,0.0000010045684,3.530407e-8,0.000005753728,0.00012753569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844508,0.00017469471,0.001077509,0.0007926302,0.00956692,0.003937455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97339857,0.0025121404,0.00034239521,0.0005438553,0.008770523,0.014432513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049645983,0.00015839616,0.0004951334,0.047810517,0.00053612626,0.011363441,0.018131519,0.00007665269,0.00084331346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1357879,0.00011111686,0.00005788265,0.12067905,0.0033190942,0.0070812525,0.0022086818,0.0011090426,0.000038737842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004370537,0.000006236401,0.46791375,9.848156e-7,0.0000012600601,0.00008962877,0.000057263984,0.0000067546707,0.00030725013,0.52988553,0.00033322707,0.0013937457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030731616,0.00008683848,0.88971424,0.000039607297,0.000002195975,0.0002876535,0.0034449955,0.0007600722,0.0005712987,0.10428698,0.00035297716,0.00014580633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91780555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42559853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012695339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16474819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998069622","doi":"","title":"Innovation and Expanding Horizons within Research at the University of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New horizons; Regional science; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.6617326890072415,"score_gpt":0.5625533020659698,"score_spread":0.09917938694127171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998069622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97237957,0.00008164912,0.00043571898,0.0007392756,0.0001284949,0.00017519237,0.000004348481,0.000004844232,0.026050897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97856855,0.000033931185,0.00021442259,0.000014217807,0.000010353367,1.9709131e-7,7.486867e-7,0.0000021467083,0.021155445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420434,0.00022990124,0.00022067185,0.00030920363,0.004808833,0.00022705643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224716,0.0041622575,0.00009829784,0.00046166038,0.0029642007,0.00006643887],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029487517,0.000040990177,0.0001013871,0.025205629,0.0003792454,0.0003980595,0.0009444571,0.000047661728,0.0014014293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006466524,0.0000229318,0.000021990349,0.16768934,0.00028498622,0.0002918648,0.0011955246,0.00017711699,0.00059803564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004187618,0.00002941591,0.88232744,0.0000047043154,0.000006717172,0.0000024380327,0.00045258572,0.000013378361,0.02252592,0.03096809,0.03275816,0.030869279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071896036,0.00042931022,0.894028,0.0000127194035,0.0000026188804,0.0000056435583,0.03554114,0.004920898,0.013139663,0.01597751,0.035074554,0.00014894806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002904395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038545992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1424837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008465702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007877375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998095279","doi":"10.1002/asi.24330","title":"The citation advantage of promoted articles in a cross‐publisher distribution platform: A 12‐month randomized controlled trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Confidence interval; Citation; Internal medicine; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.09548717587147706,"score_gpt":0.45004287221649125,"score_spread":0.35455569634501416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998095279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911189,0.000056896908,0.0008493295,0.004145204,0.0009129448,0.0020541043,0.00000962853,0.000004952545,0.000848041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948174,0.000055200115,0.000083814884,0.000029372311,0.000012332804,0.00003659941,9.852926e-7,0.0000012903955,0.00029868336],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922283,0.00015747636,0.0018738199,0.00011199606,0.005340166,0.00028823712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97818434,0.006354505,0.0038949961,0.0002496931,0.011263565,0.00005292018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09832134,0.000067898196,0.00049723533,0.011350602,0.0003253522,0.0015753064,0.0012856465,0.00012783134,0.0000046875152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28985515,0.000029876946,0.00017989897,0.04213507,0.00041260885,0.004635259,0.00018188053,0.00021521168,0.0000041365993],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.45014042,0.00033894688,0.21037234,0.000023733413,0.00017131513,3.267245e-7,0.0022472846,0.00040816172,0.0022821594,0.1349822,0.0039769807,0.19505613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.83602047,0.0006552982,0.034031503,0.000023562608,0.000026932483,0.0000063119123,0.0028874131,0.03190398,0.001673925,0.0845325,0.008126157,0.000111932124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052007194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007914343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38588005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003172617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051974005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998549},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"randomized_trial","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"randomized_trial","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2998153594","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.1.2018-0047","title":"How Far Apart Are L and M? The Institutional and Publishing Disconnects between LIS and Museum Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Publication; Discipline; Scholarly communication; The arts; Political science; Higher education; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4553739326490477,"score_gpt":0.48933954987135586,"score_spread":0.033965617222308175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998153594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.748202,0.004225932,0.0021538222,0.24372672,0.0004115055,0.00032090527,0.00003033845,0.0000054562242,0.00092328375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932217,0.0026366895,0.001246011,0.002674608,0.00016227935,0.0000052518244,0.0000017853274,0.0000013596609,0.000050336654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757063,0.000051730232,0.0004799883,0.00014763194,0.001607473,0.00014252424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995568,0.0021764485,0.00064905756,0.00009471438,0.0011525075,0.0003592847],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166835,0.00006940569,0.0001930441,0.005587623,0.0007132712,0.013719428,0.00056116545,0.000030684805,0.000003858333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03466724,0.00003632368,0.000028048513,0.01508636,0.0010031478,0.083820745,0.00038815013,0.00014678428,4.389463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018454443,0.000038723192,0.18216008,0.00013873968,0.000043938504,5.4313125e-7,0.016359212,0.000019605328,0.000073643794,0.33372667,0.03118082,0.43607348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016289871,0.00029750087,0.43216705,0.00007116552,0.000018328543,0.00007139281,0.045545354,0.0043820296,0.0003295163,0.023292772,0.49201953,0.00017637042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.1089384e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.1764234e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46083874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009283158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049657014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98730445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998363348","doi":"10.1007/s11192-019-03339-x","title":"The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Web of science; Political science; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.40245736986760666,"score_gpt":0.5294233401406908,"score_spread":0.12696597027308415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998363348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91279554,0.0030526756,0.0008228233,0.003567369,0.0007272805,0.00056009553,0.00010113873,0.000040944054,0.078332156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999057,0.00009355951,0.0005411955,0.000021617127,0.000028471839,0.000009041754,8.665044e-7,0.0000069506223,0.0002412964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97615623,0.0001933559,0.0013749254,0.0008745887,0.020557126,0.00084375014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851052,0.0038702176,0.0007967435,0.0013344686,0.0081375325,0.0007558106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052034017,0.00013782273,0.00038788063,0.14968626,0.000492373,0.0016090189,0.007038584,0.00008051716,0.000050920495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17766507,0.00007896608,0.00015016088,0.8136093,0.0021330682,0.00086809427,0.001515258,0.0002997782,0.000070048955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002422099,0.00023346185,0.64912796,0.000029106062,0.000008872534,0.000002185553,0.001111199,0.00022229193,0.019175202,0.15922688,0.001981582,0.16885705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052837376,0.00024458944,0.80620056,0.0000179467,0.0000055272567,0.0000046891205,0.0056019477,0.1132713,0.012683889,0.0019597968,0.059282925,0.00019845975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001027676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015446512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6639231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024868004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015980299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998826136","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scz060","title":"The effect of collaboration with top-funded scholars on scientific production","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public funding; Production (economics); Political science; Private sector; Grant funding; Economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.2052903149857554,"score_gpt":0.524984266830868,"score_spread":0.31969395184511257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998826136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818037,0.000101932856,0.0000126800105,0.008598189,0.0006793032,0.00044998416,0.0000052535197,0.000010489188,0.008338458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647486,0.00002520224,0.0000321402,0.000059699483,0.000060971037,0.000007739649,6.135099e-7,0.0000034044597,0.0033353644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883188,0.00022177372,0.0002925514,0.0007573515,0.0098196855,0.00058986485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149066,0.0017674051,0.00023531618,0.0010488207,0.005124536,0.00033327655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052795127,0.000098751545,0.00015923356,0.029527683,0.001306349,0.010016409,0.0017947864,0.00004008236,0.00002314338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076518066,0.00004448915,0.00002790251,0.2755631,0.002105041,0.0022606307,0.00029546165,0.00015689337,0.0001395841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012964186,0.00006111244,0.48816228,0.000011042512,0.00000783194,5.547383e-7,0.00028655483,0.000045526693,0.022684047,0.040127076,0.005549903,0.44293442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209427,0.006829272,0.5485018,0.000048916703,0.000009009437,0.000028925915,0.0025151458,0.004437323,0.19230537,0.013178077,0.22949918,0.0005527019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095845535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000390216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4423817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001469648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001956047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001161520","doi":"10.2196/11567","title":"The Most-Cited Authors Who Published Papers in JMIR mHealth and uHealth Using the Authorship-Weighted Scheme: Bibliometric Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR mhealth and uhealth","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; mHealth; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Centrality; Citation; Node (physics); Social network analysis; Scheme (mathematics); Data science; Information retrieval; Data mining; World Wide Web; Social media; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.44396058215574663,"score_gpt":0.5561299710683189,"score_spread":0.11216938891257222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001161520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92159456,0.011220995,0.00047841307,0.06343771,0.00041887342,0.0017962593,0.00011074508,0.00009465341,0.000847805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813936,0.011546793,0.0008734978,0.0053763166,0.00030655562,0.000095050425,0.00002861967,0.000049606646,0.00033001354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.979305,0.00312395,0.0030461457,0.002408173,0.00894901,0.003167704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980098,0.009518821,0.0016129892,0.001646769,0.0019299652,0.00519347],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051175836,0.0006140083,0.0014700433,0.29638997,0.0036128662,0.0058592944,0.0028972132,0.0005295125,0.00016963869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02073729,0.00034364735,0.00026584143,0.852851,0.0008156286,0.0010369321,0.0010747658,0.0023539995,0.000021023721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005545502,0.00028537223,0.71143013,0.0005267181,0.0001344752,0.00002622209,0.0038696085,0.000060516988,0.000041665808,0.0036019813,0.017535841,0.2619329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012676188,0.00049957656,0.83553344,0.000024993942,0.00010744696,0.000012695771,0.0021842553,0.13697025,0.0000045891416,0.0016527431,0.021352112,0.00039027366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017612685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056285196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.556461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005239749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026047898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002594776","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scz062","title":"Canadian Science Meets Parliament: Building relationships between scientists and policymakers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; Cape Breton University; Laurentian University; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Toronto; Western University; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of Manitoba; Royal Military College of Canada; Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Event (particle physics); Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.6079505841042503,"score_gpt":0.5504148990321218,"score_spread":0.05753568507212847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002594776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8582434,0.0002825032,0.00020622327,0.12621076,0.00017126797,0.00024358594,0.0000681295,0.00003454334,0.014539563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658644,0.000075043004,0.0009823919,0.0019398239,0.00024162947,0.000005289468,0.0000010998947,0.000007855442,0.00016040655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516196,0.00015234295,0.0005453105,0.0015822705,0.010531305,0.002026799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861491,0.0012891686,0.00021821701,0.00073264237,0.003652523,0.0079583805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043901045,0.00019276829,0.0002786799,0.07436529,0.0047800485,0.015313816,0.0040192017,0.00009109727,0.000053841013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1594313,0.00015002092,0.00004220141,0.34004524,0.0062959953,0.004592566,0.0016507617,0.00039420885,0.00010499401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027218173,0.000014817289,0.6396116,0.000005960955,0.000004885058,0.000006560288,0.0014681685,0.000003574587,0.0023110448,0.14680618,0.00455968,0.2052048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004180255,0.00014365016,0.7969296,0.000010573013,0.0000055772093,0.000026222035,0.0015795354,0.0064651044,0.00089602434,0.02152689,0.17153735,0.0004614361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051269572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003960831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26567996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075267634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013972835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965156},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3003267280","doi":"10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-4-228-247","title":"THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Research and Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Impact; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; World Wide Web; Citation analysis; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Geography; Internal medicine; Meta-analysis; Statistics; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5742008247629874,"score_gpt":0.6164333840370883,"score_spread":0.042232559274100856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003267280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970328,0.000504686,0.00032753154,0.0009015582,0.00001100262,0.00035095395,0.00020747294,0.000001347171,0.0006626279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865204,0.0011950664,0.00004110877,0.000024109273,0.000002931095,0.00000522956,0.0000015476081,0.0000012690589,0.000076693446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993516,0.00039561788,0.0006707596,0.00015829262,0.0049699005,0.000289424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917196,0.0021224208,0.0003451752,0.00043767755,0.0051641967,0.0002108969],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02898114,0.00005260684,0.00020473791,0.0083832955,0.00033272934,0.007890984,0.003420982,0.000029537337,0.000066695975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03218464,0.000023426806,0.000085671745,0.11666746,0.00040934127,0.014857562,0.0036865445,0.00027178306,0.0000037120442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001791968,0.000036057598,0.9017044,0.000044030756,0.00009450265,6.915572e-8,0.0021031576,0.00009504877,0.0011313877,0.00033551594,0.0008187804,0.093457885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023660973,0.00028787553,0.96157056,0.0000071791515,0.000010746163,1.6476189e-7,0.0005942992,0.032243922,0.0021727423,0.0023480062,0.00050009985,0.000027769673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036285823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004618794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10828416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021186963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023117893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004189244","doi":"10.22148/001c.11824","title":"Send us your null results","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Null (SQL); Null hypothesis; Code (set theory); Statistical power; Econometrics; Computer science; Power (physics); Statistics; Data science; Mathematics; Data mining; Physics; Programming language","score_opus":0.7901292379649458,"score_gpt":0.6004316014343586,"score_spread":0.18969763653058724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004189244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94842243,0.0008971519,0.002469895,0.035644073,0.00074162544,0.000085070635,0.000058851285,0.000011704706,0.011669188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363977,0.00035532954,0.0018938449,0.0008328196,0.0006952384,9.709656e-8,0.0000013190562,0.0000054904813,0.0025760718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964584,0.00013970646,0.0014241226,0.00027940536,0.0081526255,0.00035827886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899043,0.0010652099,0.0010036564,0.0002484028,0.0068996893,0.00087876135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077225333,0.00013076706,0.00043468107,0.008206807,0.0001291892,0.0018304865,0.0019923747,0.00008524578,0.00026286612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055487018,0.00006681694,0.00039391074,0.07469781,0.00009722919,0.00082917477,0.0002901918,0.00049611495,0.00030742562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005385134,0.00021053001,0.03997182,0.000010980084,0.0001807652,0.0006418949,0.0020778358,0.004386955,0.0052616885,0.00047476194,0.8962834,0.04996087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002612688,0.0015404208,0.06370868,0.000024982905,0.000078084726,0.0002941995,0.005124151,0.043108065,0.0028441185,0.0032363443,0.8770221,0.00040618714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009514587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027226981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000749528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015864697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004444638","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: Chicago 16th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Library science; History; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.4304604824637775,"score_gpt":0.5349106240665301,"score_spread":0.10445014160275262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004444638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047452902,0.0029534772,0.045771945,0.012322674,0.01348613,0.0010029712,0.0014277843,0.0003074327,0.9222531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048607034,0.0055778697,0.005195983,0.0016581727,0.005806516,0.00009171148,0.00042253768,0.000110685374,0.9762758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96818936,0.0005957673,0.0025279932,0.0021552055,0.025249865,0.0012817894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96935856,0.015055558,0.0012817272,0.0024199514,0.0109945955,0.0008896079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03477516,0.00056840567,0.00097298995,0.13230063,0.00048795817,0.0067067132,0.0060622445,0.0010092113,0.025796134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13297457,0.00032467852,0.00059315475,0.16391622,0.00036881154,0.0016871467,0.0014832558,0.00075708283,0.012088869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008114935,0.000056143734,0.00044561632,0.000012697016,0.000026136027,0.000011604177,0.000026642741,0.0000012348501,0.00009011382,0.0014098977,0.8107682,0.18714361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045054208,0.00019505498,0.0027662246,0.0000820527,0.00001529227,0.000008535326,0.0001855844,0.00034837058,0.00033308603,0.02811696,0.9669875,0.0005108072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002254691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006382972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18663281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004555479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001150679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004511502","doi":"","title":"L’Université Jean Monnet et l’Université d’Ottawa signent une convention de coopération scientifique","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2780296047095412,"score_gpt":0.4727365369301849,"score_spread":0.19470693222064372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004511502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22952104,0.0030339486,0.30670035,0.054530572,0.0059399544,0.0010270772,0.00017659356,0.00014365755,0.3989268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53685844,0.0015685031,0.0029286912,0.00060214585,0.0002406976,0.0000025738545,0.000030052654,0.000019996412,0.45774892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896495,0.000963634,0.0007104455,0.0012449188,0.006203855,0.0012276957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888459,0.002472828,0.0004040927,0.00090034615,0.006335718,0.0010411515],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02442743,0.00030139452,0.00036298909,0.03254336,0.0011970043,0.0031805146,0.0022867976,0.00038205594,0.02204955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060929665,0.00027903914,0.0002912854,0.16273719,0.0012470323,0.0019068773,0.0010414833,0.0004128614,0.0036081371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100193094,0.0007984264,0.016638001,0.000037561313,0.00007854413,0.00013115807,0.0016833501,0.00023833223,0.011257122,0.21096733,0.52335227,0.2347177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013138589,0.0007769881,0.036474295,0.00007169124,0.000047460282,0.00002842214,0.0025334293,0.083562925,0.0155772865,0.008501865,0.85061836,0.0004933968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050106803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034299288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3272661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006383625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090084353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004755503","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: Need help?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Geography; World Wide Web; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4887741113448896,"score_gpt":0.5461906142176708,"score_spread":0.05741650287278122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004755503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010623073,0.0047564474,0.017117167,0.011765516,0.008427798,0.0009347803,0.0007643049,0.0002765088,0.9548952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003417288,0.0036379371,0.004708234,0.0013971386,0.001993748,0.000053598964,0.00011660832,0.00009436752,0.98458105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669516,0.00057873287,0.0026848982,0.0021321191,0.02621226,0.0014403969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633242,0.019168964,0.0011862293,0.0028191018,0.01248611,0.0010154201],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038457796,0.0005941835,0.0011026806,0.16649218,0.00041482504,0.008054607,0.007936907,0.0009483827,0.02367843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16256258,0.00033049274,0.00065113895,0.21783182,0.0003458402,0.001352697,0.002044511,0.00065983343,0.015570524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007962505,0.000041753487,0.0012847335,0.000010826105,0.000028437082,0.000015880272,0.000027844015,0.0000011555713,0.00011079389,0.0010740401,0.77885234,0.21854421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047678204,0.00016809095,0.0015737057,0.000063881474,0.000013214105,0.000007712605,0.0004756729,0.0003886157,0.00028313088,0.015966997,0.9800477,0.0005344798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039840786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006314587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21800974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004235425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012797356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006156524","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561","title":"Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; University of Ottawa; Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Outreach; Snowball sampling; Delphi method; Publishing; Checklist; Public relations; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.7858935230383207,"score_gpt":0.6547070806373642,"score_spread":0.13118644240095656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006156524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013997,0.001192291,0.0009614991,0.05913519,0.0002580162,0.004841887,0.00009786884,0.000025305219,0.032088276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517417,0.000029387287,0.0008091661,0.0024589235,0.00010131079,0.00013670689,7.7190674e-7,0.000013076763,0.0012765072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920571,0.000536052,0.00069576193,0.00071273785,0.005506241,0.0004921317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164027,0.0050096083,0.0002962572,0.0006942268,0.0016232703,0.00073638593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03954222,0.00014053984,0.0003389383,0.013777348,0.00060300727,0.008913535,0.0044221412,0.00007675587,0.0002524096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08963586,0.000075792355,0.000060211205,0.08829046,0.00008188947,0.0004916695,0.0031583342,0.00030157468,0.0003109448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004967972,0.000191508,0.1973189,0.00008048205,0.00018112815,0.00043771806,0.035393324,0.0046310783,0.0031112474,0.020783104,0.36892292,0.36398062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089405775,0.0031675173,0.43265355,0.0007237735,0.000090552,0.0007423301,0.066853955,0.14736328,0.004403548,0.100563176,0.23169625,0.0028015068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006838201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033891043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3611791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034099045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047628445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99740064},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3006456429","doi":"10.3386/w26752","title":"Stagnation and Scientific Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.9232644462540172,"score_gpt":0.7214025480609675,"score_spread":0.20186189819304967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006456429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707537,0.0056275777,0.0006204489,0.019408815,0.0028449257,0.0020475672,0.00088997144,0.000042358653,0.19776466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445325,0.00034847064,0.00079216616,0.00001683128,0.00023801942,0.00003538353,0.00011052863,0.000014081665,0.0039912425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808739,0.00072144606,0.0011524531,0.0016824995,0.015015369,0.0005543599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97692,0.009563462,0.0004913615,0.00066853425,0.011913375,0.00044328158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06395192,0.0001777778,0.00047847524,0.0600862,0.00040095064,0.0048874076,0.003149489,0.0003032515,0.0006866389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059653975,0.00015221832,0.00016293133,0.02991079,0.0013060175,0.0005431869,0.0055977725,0.0011269307,0.0004675549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009379379,0.00017324931,0.020940924,0.000094969604,0.0000884172,0.0000043777804,0.0004431586,0.0008543872,0.0026289956,0.8398038,0.091844425,0.043029465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026654542,0.0000713513,0.019556187,0.000020336951,0.0000021641117,0.0000010289347,0.0001763279,0.025536127,0.00067469606,0.9456951,0.007859061,0.00014104552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002002207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029597793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2236996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000676423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027836566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006487896","doi":"","title":"AUTUMN/STEP and POLARIS EHB: Spanning Canada With Research Magnetometers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AGUSM","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetometer; History; Physics","score_opus":0.6373386149683724,"score_gpt":0.5951032734904066,"score_spread":0.042235341477965815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006487896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724017,0.0017473215,0.00055283855,0.00583349,0.0001775565,0.00021877712,0.00001317007,0.000020512101,0.019034654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133366,0.0000710181,0.001812085,0.0004246014,0.00006221957,0.0000033120202,0.0000012911264,0.000008378051,0.0062834406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98655766,0.0002634315,0.00036870906,0.0007448792,0.011106618,0.00095871644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344975,0.00306992,0.00009081224,0.0006990062,0.0020223293,0.0006681903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015267896,0.00013919521,0.00025497386,0.028457941,0.0005069986,0.0021794115,0.0014436564,0.000080008685,0.00023492567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01021215,0.00008947161,0.00003474038,0.1278908,0.00020727262,0.00043971746,0.00034062256,0.0005171025,0.00006398544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055140274,0.00006129478,0.3421885,0.000004194809,0.00001432336,0.0002764247,0.00019904108,0.000010981543,0.00061243796,0.0011013717,0.1674829,0.48799336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043083404,0.000665661,0.86989874,0.0000128298725,0.00000320613,0.000035203087,0.0008148874,0.0014372882,0.00035618345,0.0013713142,0.12476455,0.00020932192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29617584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10248206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5277102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020459277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085211877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008285975","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.2.01","title":"Exporting China’s Scholarly Books: Current Conditions for Chinese Publishers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Negotiation; Quality (philosophy); Subsidy; State (computer science); Intellectual property; Economics; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Political science; Law; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.3997333539609277,"score_gpt":0.534722518974928,"score_spread":0.13498916501400027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008285975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96130157,0.0038811609,0.0058825114,0.010825593,0.006705358,0.00055613916,0.000072146504,0.0000327935,0.010742741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925384,0.00007874789,0.0035327356,0.00046523064,0.0010763687,0.000012334102,0.000014657722,0.000038399234,0.0022431237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776248,0.0004423027,0.002971505,0.00081128505,0.017087374,0.0010627322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486669,0.0058071055,0.004079343,0.0012293472,0.038628265,0.0015890962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104423486,0.00031029293,0.0007872301,0.06015354,0.0006749881,0.43927863,0.007593375,0.0003145492,0.000805099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42231962,0.00020939423,0.0008116836,0.07158014,0.000100832185,0.40046743,0.0009847599,0.0037681854,0.00012094214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074808515,0.00026589783,0.70770955,0.000025219335,0.000066590335,0.000017045317,0.00044154486,0.00012328291,0.0037003718,0.0027852582,0.16543421,0.11935621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030685035,0.00058619026,0.6946169,0.00014089285,0.00002906126,0.00013940006,0.0021413532,0.0013725052,0.00013065939,0.05690181,0.24041279,0.00045994378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003951732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058093956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31789613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045169072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013578582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009643737","doi":"10.17511/ijphr.2018.i1.06","title":"Cost in high impact journals: The problem for researchers from low and middle income countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Review International Journal of Public Health Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Promotion (chess); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; Library science; Sample (material); Publishing; Political science; Computer science; Business; Geography; World Wide Web; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.9278262047464299,"score_gpt":0.7275617858558884,"score_spread":0.20026441889054147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009643737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04098885,0.14865172,0.0047111167,0.80159295,0.000868222,0.002584161,0.00034784066,0.000009293217,0.00024587975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5072922,0.4690032,0.004760757,0.015831893,0.002366824,0.00023980415,0.000033180873,0.000055074914,0.00041703967],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.924523,0.018636972,0.007971092,0.0013750927,0.042182412,0.005311409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82240236,0.058952574,0.00516254,0.0017801903,0.102898106,0.008804258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5315265,0.00026783926,0.001219074,0.04019217,0.0011150609,0.0077856537,0.007414081,0.00015978143,0.0014349767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22907361,0.00014931861,0.00030298924,0.059546616,0.0012115915,0.002722219,0.0013430234,0.0023790256,0.000101727805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009705934,0.0003497083,0.060196493,0.000613912,0.00013069628,0.000016881142,0.0013758433,0.0000013169021,0.0000012677699,0.0030469329,0.096649565,0.8375203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015263783,0.001395103,0.15302484,0.002858962,0.0000014508524,0.000096948694,0.0010132042,0.00075231184,0.0000016295353,0.009335631,0.8298459,0.00014764913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030282368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007847581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83737266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039977054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024875684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999225},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3009671763","doi":"10.1177/0961000620907958","title":"Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Information science; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.4194052641794983,"score_gpt":0.5149488567052041,"score_spread":0.09554359252570577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009671763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836614,0.00017400608,0.0050244583,0.006879332,0.000135633,0.00026761327,0.00026052585,0.0000071471204,0.0035898788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370295,0.00032980434,0.005792798,0.00012697853,0.000024658597,0.0000025056208,0.000013666236,0.0000023881908,0.0000042310626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885621,0.0002127642,0.0019275986,0.00038175168,0.008573758,0.00034199026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680776,0.0016881006,0.0017153227,0.0005323392,0.008307526,0.000948946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024480235,0.00011757884,0.0004385118,0.06891798,0.0006375102,0.006182586,0.0029952927,0.000078803634,0.000049984083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022499662,0.00008759655,0.000050637576,0.26310706,0.004245909,0.14936264,0.0016303527,0.00026681172,0.0000030864162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065741956,0.00021625849,0.63211715,0.000071642,0.00007133589,5.051817e-7,0.07598343,0.00077764585,0.12328267,0.08438459,0.0018266583,0.08061071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449198,0.0004849672,0.857591,0.00003103751,0.000025482424,0.0000012298307,0.017100483,0.11345593,0.008546646,0.0011494022,0.0011743951,0.00009450647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006656951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006734582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22547385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068321715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037561872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010164141","doi":"","title":"La recherche-création : analyse de son adoption dans le monde universitaire au Québec.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.500420566366593,"score_gpt":0.45706706963777954,"score_spread":0.0433534967288135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010164141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9272611,0.0041158763,0.019934578,0.0144791845,0.00018254403,0.0003399413,0.000057191584,0.000026166528,0.033603393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783961,0.008302015,0.0064110537,0.00005822207,0.000051661234,2.845897e-7,0.0000065925906,0.000009667042,0.006764365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451095,0.0023800407,0.0003298077,0.0008064998,0.0015164329,0.00045625545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950851,0.0021284006,0.00043052292,0.0004234,0.0010939484,0.00083862146],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009449919,0.00020536728,0.0004195009,0.067755036,0.0012465704,0.0013329309,0.0022809731,0.00052282086,0.00016504701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009051287,0.00023001005,0.000357767,0.3044976,0.00094528333,0.0030110015,0.0013589496,0.0005945604,0.000018720188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030220277,0.00031331147,0.93448156,0.00007316573,0.00017677994,0.00018826753,0.007062147,0.000082687504,0.007817933,0.00053790654,0.019168006,0.029796042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014222042,0.00084300217,0.88241595,0.000104380415,0.00022896021,0.000042117103,0.09232209,0.00820487,0.0013251206,0.0006685884,0.012006631,0.00041605785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28849825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021431944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28635505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002594276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018220562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011072340","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2003.08283","title":"Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; Russian Foundation for Basic Research","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Citation; Web of science; Library science; Citation impact; Scale (ratio); Political science; Geography; Chemistry; World Wide Web; Operations research; Computer science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7368958277052544,"score_gpt":0.3945571757697195,"score_spread":0.3423386519355349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011072340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97165954,0.0002760926,0.013313374,0.0013040446,0.00093952805,0.00063510065,0.0006255484,0.000030981362,0.011215787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660665,0.0005745335,0.000098434444,0.0001996738,0.00006543349,0.0000010130144,0.0000062133536,0.000013207389,0.0024348528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932878,0.00069676037,0.0006422123,0.0015730174,0.0032904167,0.0005097708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054676,0.00460682,0.000713869,0.0017920511,0.002029264,0.00031120476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014297043,0.00025249578,0.00043716677,0.022091867,0.00015373377,0.0021906684,0.008685778,0.00038322905,0.0005026265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034551077,0.00018770249,0.00024278591,0.08388351,0.00036659927,0.0010568958,0.0052021155,0.0015863597,0.00012685254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056574633,0.0008573887,0.62516725,0.00065957714,0.0001896243,0.0008508104,0.00071078603,0.14812261,0.0005784729,0.16633792,0.044050757,0.011909047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013014099,0.00030198265,0.63876486,0.0005123211,0.00006460351,0.000003084275,0.0012338709,0.21429701,0.00071418483,0.13818511,0.0037666303,0.0008549384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004545836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007076738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0661744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031273154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010055724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011698931","doi":"","title":"Electronic Resources Management (ERM): A Scientometric Study of Global Publications during 1999-2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; Productivity; Library science; Per capita; Political science; Scientometrics; Geography; Business; Social science; Accounting; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Population; Computer science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.3898018587868382,"score_gpt":0.5496885046335837,"score_spread":0.15988664584674545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011698931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366436,0.0009902795,0.00078771537,0.0005948163,0.0002018752,0.00041464707,0.00001590579,0.000048278926,0.060302887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827173,0.00013488984,0.0005068442,0.000035549485,0.00003055097,0.000030311838,0.0000020858474,0.0000071793806,0.016535303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98390585,0.000304878,0.0009814405,0.0011828489,0.012668261,0.000956701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99313885,0.00092529715,0.00029603665,0.0017109991,0.0035204652,0.00040835564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116791865,0.00016393833,0.00034902274,0.0669506,0.00042895923,0.0026385644,0.0031400966,0.00006402192,0.0013754071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010379951,0.00012161598,0.00016221037,0.633531,0.00013421221,0.0005799635,0.0022767424,0.00017979961,0.0002244556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025107482,0.0033254134,0.92021465,0.000015701182,0.00014020332,0.00003263982,0.00023318132,0.00008198529,0.00044888182,0.017142626,0.009644939,0.04869466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010804688,0.00025617876,0.9679567,0.0000036768886,0.000017265813,0.000014686886,0.007461043,0.00039051013,0.00043596848,0.0030278014,0.01918703,0.000168637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001757753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030046634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56658036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044147528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026214615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011709894","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0228914","title":"Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Prestige; Publishing; Audience measurement; Promotion (chess); Publication; Value (mathematics); Impact factor; Citation; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6983512650567966,"score_gpt":0.4912175993014682,"score_spread":0.20713366575532838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011709894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23754436,0.060393617,0.0019731915,0.6960525,0.00008110036,0.001280047,0.00022581608,0.000106321015,0.0023430486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97176826,0.015364545,0.007817243,0.0030044068,0.0002570951,0.0001219044,0.000049289487,0.000028454066,0.0015887964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373925,0.000305616,0.0005534697,0.00079831755,0.004251944,0.00035138885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334717,0.0024080533,0.00020601043,0.00042883365,0.0028259982,0.0007839242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005594126,0.00015628626,0.00035856004,0.008726468,0.00040738823,0.01003366,0.00080977305,0.00011232397,0.00026015285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11758511,0.00010499905,0.00005715911,0.07845373,0.000082827595,0.0038695587,0.0006016946,0.00039564812,0.000081677776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001605346,0.00056408584,0.14643636,0.0005510017,0.000070651375,0.0000051004135,0.007941492,0.0000026507066,0.00126468,0.000722417,0.76386595,0.07855956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035702207,0.002903746,0.48489603,0.008662741,0.00031715576,0.00003660643,0.044461846,0.022037365,0.0031607347,0.13127425,0.2959746,0.002704673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001383564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017180893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042192158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007166852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99099404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012059513","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v13i1.533","title":"“Let’s Make Submissions Easier”: Revised Author Guidelines at IJTMB","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Computer science; Library science; Operations research; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7022108339471691,"score_gpt":0.7069395311075087,"score_spread":0.004728697160339634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012059513","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051957194,0.019927414,0.0019632124,0.11499761,0.8401618,0.001015332,0.00020353921,0.000026923475,0.021184588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067284917,0.024738722,0.0069158627,0.0017740306,0.6630222,0.00008202313,0.00018889735,0.00017383246,0.29637593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9164786,0.0060138702,0.0041962643,0.0014379876,0.0705812,0.0012921192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56167907,0.15901572,0.008790938,0.0035617778,0.26477334,0.0021791814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1667196,0.00060358015,0.0011750666,0.053560745,0.00073734066,0.009269146,0.014098068,0.0012127284,0.0061825607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6438557,0.0004449688,0.0009448627,0.04086431,0.00043058046,0.0023374595,0.002547521,0.006093044,0.002430833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011675808,0.0007970946,0.0005472244,0.000021936097,0.0004676838,0.00009559618,0.00021462126,0.000027891141,0.0002714038,0.0003825606,0.8084777,0.18752873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090741005,0.00040839726,0.0005770389,0.00046271164,0.00010308954,0.00016090416,0.001665795,0.00026107355,0.00006253199,0.0049938657,0.9899861,0.00041108794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023049585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002273226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47713608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003771889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021716958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012585693","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.20.997783","title":"A comparative analysis reveals irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project; Brock University","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Search engine; Scopus; Information retrieval; Computer science; Web of science; Cornerstone; Scientific literature; Data science; Keyword search; Search analytics; World Wide Web; Web search query; Geography; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.40596392155440814,"score_gpt":0.4769058233067329,"score_spread":0.07094190175232479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012585693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99181414,0.003592761,0.00088353455,0.0007369438,0.0007690545,0.0009763311,0.0011173807,0.00006466603,0.000045215726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549896,0.000115102695,0.0040968186,0.00004248981,0.00012333077,0.00006654946,0.0000012583308,0.000024073463,0.00003145084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810946,0.0015983727,0.0021587615,0.004634012,0.009526944,0.0009873095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97839296,0.0026037258,0.001276156,0.005688276,0.011196847,0.00084200955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051299326,0.0005454194,0.0021384512,0.07524716,0.0002303488,0.005313577,0.005084652,0.00057820824,0.00017916327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048134215,0.00045111886,0.00071775675,0.382007,0.0008154559,0.0005584034,0.0038440793,0.0018194075,0.00012163135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009410493,0.00065178925,0.6887363,0.00029951968,0.0005086111,0.000084410894,0.00030171475,0.00058388565,0.3059405,0.000579911,0.0022038699,0.000015347408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027090104,0.000060770322,0.92434204,0.00014018796,0.000097896,3.7691343e-9,0.00002310609,0.0055913473,0.06791795,0.00018705222,0.00089711684,0.00047166104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011111994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019956717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30675986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004163471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016263593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013013892","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p214","title":"Publishing at Any Cost? The Need for the Improvement of the Quality of Scholarly Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Dynamism; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Open access publishing; Public relations; Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Scholarly communication; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; History","score_opus":0.6183508697685842,"score_gpt":0.604278366962529,"score_spread":0.01407250280605521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013013892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47227457,0.0013248608,0.0034841802,0.5162684,0.004515389,0.000504238,0.000084770174,0.0000028233771,0.0015407765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506384,0.00005599022,0.00026600945,0.0020252403,0.000496953,0.00001811979,0.000002975595,0.0000045004604,0.0020663415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197257,0.0001880434,0.0011570957,0.00016080629,0.0063888757,0.00013263912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97225267,0.005570118,0.002173134,0.00043850418,0.019437062,0.00012852628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014194414,0.00006538977,0.00014615814,0.00298434,0.000189225,0.003002624,0.005164185,0.000045626515,0.00035100422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043087106,0.000027856535,0.0002596062,0.01624176,0.00014099739,0.0022845715,0.00048408002,0.00028469678,0.0000044740445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025252363,0.0006294003,0.27111334,0.000013110097,0.00031630183,1.0220876e-7,0.0017863971,0.00027706445,0.03506778,0.06738111,0.40533793,0.21782494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039935627,0.00007363181,0.7427305,0.000011142231,0.000014546578,0.0000023547125,0.00097313843,0.00024910682,0.0039133676,0.008162921,0.24342921,0.000040753457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010878444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010020148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5227893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019901345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080174935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013381084","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.26.007435","title":"Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Discontinuation; Medicine; Citation; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Library science; Political science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.44267548871336615,"score_gpt":0.48936587655001523,"score_spread":0.04669038783664908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013381084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468443,0.010376951,0.027878309,0.0060545364,0.0015334965,0.0032731998,0.0039009063,0.00011033732,0.000027966542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99053,0.0010749856,0.0075061964,0.0001848629,0.00036280038,0.00027502255,0.000001978083,0.00005127199,0.00001288757],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122196,0.0005154129,0.001698129,0.0013801802,0.0045964513,0.0005878695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97586095,0.006999003,0.002174678,0.0017157043,0.012792766,0.00045691422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014032668,0.00038960605,0.0008495831,0.021361679,0.0003934244,0.005401028,0.0031058546,0.00044281478,0.000062867926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10978,0.00026926585,0.0002826346,0.09050554,0.00035651692,0.0006585167,0.0015322389,0.0008072351,0.000021765765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033123154,0.0005869479,0.21362655,0.00041425801,0.0012849524,0.0000239749,0.00042749316,0.00012900139,0.716324,0.0054526725,0.05990563,0.0014933291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028271382,0.00038596164,0.77854764,0.0004280557,0.00037740546,3.562385e-8,0.00019884376,0.033155613,0.14705157,0.0010191217,0.03459865,0.0014099528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003098179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005306682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5692724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019025002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016468746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013587006","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2203.11779","title":"Studying the scientific mobility and international collaboration funded by the China Scholarship Council","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Political science; China; Funding Agency; Agency (philosophy); Mainland China; Library science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7470983581590277,"score_gpt":0.4243628991278098,"score_spread":0.3227354590312179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013587006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874049,0.0007303145,0.0023678704,0.0021113616,0.0024423387,0.00069494714,0.00028398665,0.000029790597,0.0039345333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820617,0.00025139775,0.000018719355,0.000075578144,0.000049585855,0.0000051360294,0.000024511412,0.000008641874,0.017504726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916993,0.0010650442,0.00040292033,0.0016321293,0.0048107286,0.0003898775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900433,0.0030397952,0.00047203212,0.0017847675,0.004455372,0.00020472531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046842735,0.00020798513,0.00023514165,0.006152857,0.002344056,0.008705358,0.0062729646,0.00013784066,0.0008271769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018381424,0.00013010502,0.00014232288,0.06989923,0.00082454,0.0007400847,0.007321354,0.0012192036,0.00004641565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004260153,0.0012468561,0.7166553,0.000041813655,0.00043177526,0.00009044613,0.0047216853,0.075138725,0.0005248786,0.042425763,0.13216874,0.026127996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013450178,0.00015552231,0.29867297,0.000019625651,0.00008937812,0.0000073381875,0.0131481495,0.24279551,0.00007329289,0.23015589,0.21280205,0.00073522504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028411148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028996854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4179823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013137502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011946438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013695337","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00038","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Affect (linguistics); Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.7557475091659885,"score_gpt":0.6168525148930493,"score_spread":0.13889499427293928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013695337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98202837,0.0057178657,0.0074792076,0.0025017709,0.0006285164,0.00042781065,0.000050502615,0.000021782227,0.001144204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957723,0.0009351992,0.002908156,0.00026836374,0.00005921773,0.000021121581,7.527451e-7,0.0000050862304,0.000029785157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936828,0.00015428617,0.00054952654,0.000932368,0.0040518977,0.00062910694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97963005,0.013647162,0.00028146277,0.00024204192,0.0058939476,0.00030531717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013763259,0.0001817143,0.00045783934,0.012389653,0.00062816887,0.0016315026,0.0011076912,0.00005002294,0.000046215657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14056097,0.000112205795,0.000083675564,0.057821047,0.0017496907,0.0016425372,0.0005284209,0.00016680974,0.00002879694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009883054,0.000039151353,0.88240826,0.000038543956,0.0000402379,0.0000042371703,0.08170287,0.00010192863,0.00057412864,0.02258263,0.0049379845,0.0074712182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072919857,0.0012344781,0.8783957,0.00002582217,0.000009516937,7.2523005e-7,0.071064666,0.024095241,0.00048113556,0.021616405,0.0020036737,0.0003434872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008189851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012641834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1267977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009667676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027196843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013994608","doi":"10.18438/eblip29667","title":"The Types of Publications Read by Finnish Scholars Vary with Their Purposes for Reading","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Newspaper; Documentation; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.30020067427163205,"score_gpt":0.4651800349606386,"score_spread":0.16497936068900654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013994608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011148944,0.0054774033,0.10615681,0.8567279,0.00016710948,0.0014037236,0.00031873173,0.00011246008,0.018486924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896747,0.010417909,0.026704699,0.07113136,0.00011709339,0.00018379668,0.00012755074,0.000021238184,0.001621618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728847,0.00021118045,0.00053761475,0.00019515525,0.0015811223,0.0001864593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96673506,0.03086138,0.00063196925,0.0003681367,0.0011899896,0.00021343102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060370965,0.00008262532,0.00012321904,0.0025569804,0.00047017602,0.0044804593,0.0010014529,0.000048663052,0.00012023309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098943666,0.000044228433,0.000037923677,0.030787278,0.00013467688,0.16152821,0.00018629097,0.00017950743,0.00001935189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014240181,0.00008640624,0.010701682,0.00008794877,0.00005447572,5.361356e-7,0.0005037683,0.00025073005,0.0004922599,0.18489623,0.32701105,0.47449088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018722628,0.00030735906,0.0033721174,0.000027068623,0.0000075341745,0.0000025220932,0.0009963142,0.01131597,0.0028622036,0.00038896358,0.98045987,0.00007287187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025540878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2336861e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005706047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032633252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014707999","doi":"10.29173/cjs29365","title":"Gender and Academic Promotion to Full Professor in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Salary; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Geography; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7823003432242429,"score_gpt":0.5557691220071066,"score_spread":0.2265312212171363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014707999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94173753,0.00037966282,0.0001915379,0.056740873,0.00023551872,0.00012564955,0.0000025486445,7.6893014e-7,0.00058590766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760854,0.000011106261,0.00014478237,0.001969394,0.00008651221,0.0000013542572,1.7267827e-7,0.000003030367,0.00017511977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778086,0.00032100678,0.00043690458,0.00016273765,0.00095148745,0.0003470091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745387,0.00073407154,0.00016759626,0.00010236709,0.00066582754,0.0008762661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011281681,0.00005635965,0.00019235502,0.008661331,0.00015971158,0.00016297301,0.0010451139,0.00013061905,0.00035301218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010935413,0.000032250235,0.000040285453,0.012480848,0.00023970759,0.00014264902,0.00008574225,0.0009419598,0.00006071014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043948436,0.000007980204,0.9348451,0.0000022053878,0.0000148709905,0.00007845173,0.033433296,0.000060406688,0.00068913674,0.0032344896,0.01704005,0.010550061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025031474,0.00036118008,0.9539539,0.000003630699,0.0000028717454,0.000049600672,0.0016681807,0.00009216516,0.000023955547,0.03143455,0.01210328,0.00005635696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019045798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43609467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41704887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003136407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025432897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016358634","doi":"10.3846/jbem.2020.12395","title":"TRANSATLANTIC AFFILIATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: A QUARTER-CENTURY OF BIBLIOMETRIC EVIDENCE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej","keywords":"Scopus; Quarter (Canadian coin); Web of science; Regional science; Position (finance); Political science; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Institution; Identification (biology); Library science; Sociology; Geography; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.39793160264058597,"score_gpt":0.45934585479925183,"score_spread":0.06141425215866586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016358634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99093515,0.0020635542,0.002056367,0.0033415894,0.0004005157,0.0003101615,0.000016445014,0.000001925137,0.0008742711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96274775,0.035642296,0.001511799,0.000031644067,0.00002543581,0.0000026047376,0.0000013217007,0.0000051009742,0.00003203538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634415,0.00008288015,0.0014857741,0.00033959604,0.0015318388,0.00021578177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961456,0.00046021648,0.0010760186,0.0002639428,0.0018877696,0.0001664285],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072736763,0.0001104513,0.00043906426,0.163335,0.00006397086,0.0010103902,0.00094051746,0.000042801646,0.00004400357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005819341,0.000089344496,0.000090957226,0.33754262,0.00012433152,0.0010197143,0.00019810347,0.00008566745,0.000004449215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016165298,0.0037126401,0.20015115,0.004783495,0.0009651812,0.0003210118,0.0035473064,0.07214844,0.003744685,0.21161486,0.00892982,0.4884649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051756855,0.0009469257,0.8670248,0.0005585779,0.00020220052,0.000016266124,0.014228935,0.07929041,0.00054662215,0.013458212,0.018016748,0.00053460867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010634163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016741971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66687363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058126156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012420941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016661053","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03462-0","title":"Telescopic and panoramic views of library and information science research 2011–2018: a comparison of four weighting schemes for author co-citation analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Weighting; Information retrieval; Data science; Zoom; Citation analysis; Set (abstract data type); Citation impact; Co-citation; Rank (graph theory); World Wide Web; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.7748089364909767,"score_gpt":0.6271083223531914,"score_spread":0.14770061413778535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016661053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662152,0.0015286604,0.029025653,0.0011532757,0.00014467938,0.00066496735,0.00013270107,0.000018176517,0.0011167134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202115,0.00028347675,0.017491654,0.000055091306,0.000025044677,0.000011165055,0.000013667436,0.0000064441547,0.00009232618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846341,0.00026173753,0.0014539373,0.00077130715,0.012197578,0.0006813453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849724,0.007680626,0.00090838154,0.0005375562,0.0051824884,0.000718504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037481986,0.0001479669,0.000641403,0.2297348,0.00055749627,0.002475807,0.0019164417,0.00011470327,0.00006722835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07969864,0.00011206927,0.00012736057,0.5852225,0.0014210263,0.0068551707,0.0010478362,0.0002689579,0.000018987314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000590702,0.000093784074,0.7657769,0.00016751145,0.00004017806,3.185602e-7,0.002180106,0.000059356393,0.0076214527,0.0056959307,0.0024081531,0.21589728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000993167,0.0011231806,0.57573444,0.000026610289,0.00006947147,0.0000010738822,0.004363029,0.34944925,0.034261897,0.0018709338,0.03181486,0.00029211232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014878793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012590331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3554877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047820555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005050422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985597},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3022460410","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00044","title":"How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Timeline; Openness to experience; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9412102896347241,"score_gpt":0.6538876646655836,"score_spread":0.2873226249691405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022460410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679167,0.004755988,0.00042421158,0.022763595,0.0002118741,0.0016475659,0.00049570337,0.000028164563,0.001756179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906004,0.0046177786,0.004389086,0.00003305453,0.000035283363,0.00008087725,0.000007613717,0.000019627394,0.0002162942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97260404,0.0023492733,0.0012530694,0.0028371108,0.019542975,0.0014135493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95589983,0.024753043,0.0015760311,0.0013383053,0.015561192,0.0008716037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05265013,0.0004890816,0.002022049,0.04320477,0.0011830473,0.0048335604,0.003959927,0.00021098285,0.00002506116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28095943,0.00034938936,0.0001771746,0.08299639,0.013711187,0.0016339652,0.01224127,0.0016137317,0.000011606948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000460387,0.004776876,0.44955567,0.0016074445,0.0015272968,0.000028404123,0.03217123,0.000024181918,0.2574511,0.08426767,0.0024731902,0.16565655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011552694,0.0046928264,0.7432553,0.00068495533,0.00006056242,0.0000015216283,0.1572673,0.014346401,0.025886545,0.05081141,0.0009241995,0.00091367617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006177388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002648127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29369965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030024294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010087402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023134157","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.01","title":"Do Tenure and Promotion Policies Discourage Publications in Predatory Journals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Institution; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Action (physics); Academic institution; Business; Management; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6761453625303655,"score_gpt":0.5539823309204654,"score_spread":0.12216303160990005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023134157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81818897,0.0037062548,0.0020360001,0.17285411,0.00025713287,0.00012822656,0.000020530337,0.000009733652,0.0027990444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698657,0.00048800866,0.001269759,0.00057061866,0.00043790808,0.0000018000451,9.009578e-7,0.000010507677,0.00023395312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873075,0.0004751687,0.0015091663,0.0003913026,0.0098771285,0.00043971723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98489714,0.0016756488,0.0013393073,0.0003598451,0.010573032,0.0011550285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04746996,0.00013296498,0.000376071,0.042718858,0.00026002727,0.20121066,0.0026666725,0.00019757301,0.0002522689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2910027,0.00008601977,0.00013760493,0.095155746,0.00010280332,0.13426659,0.000733844,0.0025044503,0.00001236429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024983867,0.00018639622,0.8758918,0.000010344203,0.000021941863,0.000041779942,0.0021342423,0.000053966774,0.0029477035,0.0020389534,0.047032587,0.06961527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008109753,0.00031391103,0.9336785,0.00006346305,0.000007911736,0.00018929994,0.004078438,0.0009514299,0.00008944174,0.01264908,0.0470182,0.00014931783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021934418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009394857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24353272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014944428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047391112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023509778","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.702","title":"Gender Gap in Natural Language Processing Research: Disparities in Authorship and Citations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Gender gap; Field (mathematics); Gender disparity; Gender bias; Psychology; Demography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.9217534349266007,"score_gpt":0.6847247130254399,"score_spread":0.23702872190116075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023509778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420938,0.019598588,0.0011033264,0.01161179,0.00043949348,0.00080468203,0.000048771843,0.000046570356,0.024252959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464566,0.00022944013,0.00201218,0.00013038001,0.00006959574,0.00005526324,0.000014958725,0.000014671833,0.0028278562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665756,0.0010999889,0.00088262954,0.0013727875,0.009090225,0.0008967977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905951,0.006640232,0.00014123696,0.00056244823,0.0016432503,0.00041774922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037445296,0.00020038927,0.00045001713,0.10300627,0.00017572222,0.0061497944,0.0021233002,0.0003275063,0.00020655904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08353921,0.00014641021,0.00007463364,0.15415882,0.00034805032,0.0004605233,0.004223827,0.0030007323,0.000060960036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007459278,0.00025470115,0.64746815,0.0004083277,0.000015210423,0.00035833317,0.0201894,0.00018031876,0.00036793345,0.008600342,0.016547026,0.30553564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029785873,0.00002523301,0.67248654,0.0000743354,0.0000015141717,0.0000027782753,0.0071714763,0.08761773,0.00004284459,0.23170865,0.00031296944,0.00025805412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024941228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026309248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3052776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020845604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007056201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023612994","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.02","title":"Nigerian Academics Patronizing Predatory Journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Publication; Mentorship; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Accreditation; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.7676862134537907,"score_gpt":0.5499434508952649,"score_spread":0.21774276255852587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023612994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81380624,0.014750497,0.023999736,0.13772693,0.0022549238,0.00017114103,0.00003888106,0.000032855933,0.007218798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856615,0.00068054005,0.005787332,0.0053792805,0.002218787,6.630831e-7,6.935999e-7,0.000024200082,0.00024699682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267115,0.00074852456,0.002595597,0.00051779934,0.022685073,0.0007818619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96468353,0.0040193615,0.0030229227,0.0005431521,0.024980996,0.0027500303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10074971,0.00019233597,0.00060919905,0.034858666,0.00042505225,0.22506872,0.008602949,0.00044466997,0.0007634164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46563378,0.00013418385,0.00043420354,0.10287018,0.00008968775,0.16440128,0.001298211,0.006170677,0.00010490411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009253439,0.00007560895,0.47103876,0.00001135814,0.00008347439,0.00019749085,0.0016280931,0.00022789654,0.012840841,0.0006119902,0.26965645,0.2435355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017894555,0.000635363,0.13976976,0.00010491849,0.000029450737,0.0003717592,0.00617461,0.0021140217,0.0015699214,0.015546213,0.8314476,0.0004469398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007452127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010382877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5617911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026237278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010383717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676096},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3023725873","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00926","title":"The Impact of Open Access Mandates on Invention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Inefficiency; Publishing; Open science; Impact factor; Political science; Business; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.7860488446868067,"score_gpt":0.6651684844503467,"score_spread":0.12088036023645998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023725873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6104132,0.26017448,0.014731219,0.054439925,0.000842285,0.0056400923,0.007478651,0.000012339623,0.04626779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33032537,0.6685995,0.0005035601,0.00042706786,0.000022472668,0.000005310018,0.000008257359,0.000005344634,0.00010312428],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998511,0.00014778075,0.0006287725,0.00017923156,0.00040786542,0.0001253256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945448,0.003941549,0.0005300958,0.00036479477,0.00051058916,0.00010816622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009046288,0.00006620299,0.00031181585,0.0007389245,0.00012907502,0.0013966165,0.0029995418,0.000014812248,0.00014789432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011068412,0.000027534958,0.000079736834,0.0073792646,0.00015919757,0.00021896146,0.0011746315,0.0000742277,0.000015786603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051411014,0.000039272774,0.0048042703,0.00023135084,0.000057220437,3.7039933e-7,0.0000441708,0.00017153022,0.0000052474343,0.1713897,0.099409975,0.7237955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008492147,0.0015852381,0.13343331,0.00064870965,0.00006207499,0.0000037621714,0.00015761085,0.10893656,0.000190406,0.59386295,0.15996084,0.00030930125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010916572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008534604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7234862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001663351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012288577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023730740","doi":"10.1002/bes2.1705","title":"Effects of Inferred Gender on Patterns of Co‐Authorship in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Canadian Celiac Association; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Productivity; Speculation; Ecology; Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Biology; Political science; Library science; Economic growth; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3411962373557194,"score_gpt":0.47136715724028194,"score_spread":0.13017091988456253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023730740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97861236,0.00018380216,0.00036683228,0.01963977,0.000057620946,0.00034604443,0.000054054977,0.00000519948,0.00073430006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679786,0.0002541401,0.0019356407,0.00091868185,0.00001160447,0.000015071036,0.0000023533482,0.0000032029168,0.00006142597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969698,0.0006274275,0.00069663866,0.0003670918,0.0010864664,0.00025256976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98714346,0.011234721,0.0006463495,0.00027398224,0.00057574076,0.00012574233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002942132,0.00009322118,0.0005023997,0.0013030735,0.000057567413,0.000015937037,0.001181668,0.00018985906,0.0007511602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027581993,0.000055209548,0.00025343607,0.014044199,0.0009593377,0.00001921784,0.0006829643,0.00024218725,0.000010762089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003410571,0.00051258935,0.9675128,0.000044574565,0.000030148483,1.8990491e-7,0.00021651566,0.000084974876,0.0023436018,0.00052532763,0.026307981,0.0023872128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036317098,0.0007374405,0.98687977,0.0000049647706,0.0000057051484,3.5774204e-7,0.00020672024,0.0005359901,0.0010592276,0.0020853353,0.008069407,0.000051901174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000993777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.106033e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024639862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033786775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007909988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023976011","doi":"10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1","title":"Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; MEDLINE; Data science","score_opus":0.7227239243436286,"score_gpt":0.6456942526559293,"score_spread":0.07702967168769936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023976011","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.371897e-7,0.97863775,0.013272469,0.0014749295,0.0016963064,0.004220033,0.00009956478,0.000055026176,0.0005436575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000025272511,0.9943089,0.0008376013,0.0011385775,0.0013276074,0.00029335,0.000027165477,0.000058921647,0.0020053762],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.960605,0.0031204869,0.0059748967,0.0019179555,0.027342163,0.0010394724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766127,0.01123799,0.0025107693,0.0028187942,0.003101413,0.0037183429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07897039,0.00073956343,0.008710878,0.065162346,0.0002088612,0.000987255,0.008450318,0.00049252657,0.0033999928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4567039,0.00036325192,0.0013294312,0.25113034,0.00032888673,0.00022516941,0.0017968555,0.0013031588,0.0055592246],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028811346,0.000022330645,5.6946106e-7,0.5069584,0.00007669746,0.00018377043,0.000015489151,4.5924736e-8,7.2355334e-7,0.0000054130096,0.14342344,0.34931025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015641497,0.00023576555,0.000003477487,0.36677548,0.0007770421,0.00029486552,0.000021831618,0.000031597323,9.4214165e-8,0.00006095258,0.6314033,0.00023916068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001633418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026829894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4879799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040930687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002066121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024680966","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.002","title":"Bibliometric analysis of manuscript characteristics that influence citations: A comparison of ten major dermatology journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Burns","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Citation analysis; Rank correlation; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Bibliometrics; CLARITY; Demography; Dermatology; Statistics; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5639094148789731,"score_gpt":0.5569155777803343,"score_spread":0.006993837098638767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024680966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768704,0.0021747975,0.018453667,0.0016184716,0.00011409683,0.00015422663,0.00021180454,0.000012123262,0.00039037853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808574,0.00039313192,0.0012063792,0.00021043919,0.000017283737,0.000005196543,0.000010130827,0.000007269031,0.00006441423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903779,0.00029313477,0.0017388825,0.0004799288,0.0066882744,0.00042185592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876804,0.0048406357,0.0014398487,0.000585626,0.0049882215,0.0004653042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00499224,0.00014700854,0.0010970637,0.6977986,0.000108106295,0.00066212175,0.0022895162,0.0001294036,0.0008125848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056483038,0.000109079905,0.00036262677,0.92344105,0.00028367364,0.0005211679,0.0004841398,0.0002597915,0.00007893294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019821,0.00013601383,0.9684977,0.000015657295,0.00024015353,0.000010580079,0.00043692815,0.000120508754,0.0026649246,0.00014848613,0.0023405752,0.0253683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024007051,0.00011156687,0.9736469,0.000008885467,0.0001841218,0.0000037879427,0.0007232877,0.019737378,0.0035714374,0.0003047469,0.0013579746,0.00010988454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083338426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008919102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22564241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030145764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013877975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025043114","doi":"10.1101/2020.05.12.092247","title":"Working groups, gender and publication impact of Canada’s ecology and evolution faculty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Population; Gender equity; Affirmative action; Political science; Ecology; Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Demography; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.28348804422595586,"score_gpt":0.42248471675883487,"score_spread":0.138996672532879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025043114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944694,0.0015904247,0.0018140484,0.0007189316,0.0005446776,0.0004513916,0.00031543826,0.000038339644,0.00005735495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984508,0.00017677028,0.0011250643,0.00006588267,0.00012203299,0.00002500331,6.17803e-7,0.000026268392,0.000007524089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993767,0.0002672412,0.00083504675,0.0013091201,0.0032044037,0.00061715586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930416,0.00079554005,0.0008061284,0.00089358795,0.003710184,0.00075297494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006476289,0.00031839975,0.0006165959,0.011329432,0.00022564564,0.0013334973,0.0012044247,0.0003991743,0.00005696531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017577546,0.00026215593,0.000114207076,0.029962331,0.00019376779,0.00029658977,0.0018385793,0.0006190072,0.0000065548734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022560369,0.000051921794,0.9621376,0.000052811774,0.0001055387,0.000011244883,0.000014388221,0.00004083737,0.02675369,0.0016528039,0.00912192,0.00003468359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024153857,0.000054919325,0.9923301,0.000017349088,0.000017976832,3.0110765e-8,0.000009044297,0.004693302,0.0011259017,0.0000798713,0.0011656738,0.00026432803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017345874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017086712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030192466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085314794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042494927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026288581","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.23847.2","title":"Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.902308791672649,"score_gpt":0.6945844730890101,"score_spread":0.20772431858363893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026288581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58728373,0.06477755,0.14940013,0.14299509,0.003899071,0.02045972,0.02126964,0.00017932987,0.009735736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98438597,0.0035790752,0.0075602904,0.00020420788,0.00073079835,0.0007231658,0.00026323216,0.00005882047,0.00249443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98070383,0.0012837116,0.0017548442,0.0014801072,0.013947345,0.00083016575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93722713,0.039889187,0.0013495567,0.002008081,0.018906653,0.00061939354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03926058,0.00029874253,0.00082781137,0.04518748,0.0005467282,0.008862903,0.006428092,0.0003697257,0.0003830901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2711742,0.00018151067,0.00038971935,0.12134717,0.00074542366,0.00058281014,0.0051017134,0.0014206183,0.00005645104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036771363,0.00035596665,0.06485195,0.00022661024,0.0004644093,0.000010841416,0.0028353825,0.00008217277,0.0052516386,0.005567747,0.5450525,0.37493306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038627365,0.0011694279,0.25148588,0.00038989665,0.00020795187,0.000007908133,0.008332045,0.1604916,0.009955643,0.39866874,0.16414605,0.001282137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016205952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057126916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39710224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018816948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002160741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030270071","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-1924.2014.01.029","title":"A bibliometric analysis of Medical Papers published by Huai'an First People's Hospital during 2002-2011","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zhonghua yixue keyan guanli zazhi","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Quarter (Canadian coin); Library science; Medicine; Psychology; History; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.12147194910418564,"score_gpt":0.4450959523448008,"score_spread":0.3236240032406152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030270071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98261344,0.0010817045,0.002174005,0.0030895337,0.000999514,0.00038802173,0.00020385715,0.0001151273,0.0093347775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608606,0.0005295743,0.0003971417,0.00015016508,0.00022312682,0.00003686324,0.00007486192,0.00005353908,0.0024486592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.965862,0.000675164,0.0022348221,0.002192756,0.027337806,0.0016975008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816373,0.0074199755,0.0011148785,0.0031476095,0.0041361693,0.0025440634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03159205,0.0005375645,0.0016648386,0.6988135,0.0006265119,0.0046705357,0.008765004,0.0006410757,0.026896827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09506634,0.00041085255,0.00097296544,0.8956063,0.0005394738,0.002433296,0.0019117694,0.0008176333,0.00066588755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048031055,0.0012448133,0.852704,0.000037419108,0.00059783284,0.000025460473,0.0005662686,0.00011436149,0.0005448941,0.00058114086,0.058392514,0.0851433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013177176,0.00051029806,0.9400011,0.000016342705,0.00019749592,0.0000071085274,0.0004550858,0.020532213,0.00052253035,0.00029323107,0.035532795,0.0006141391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019433745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012439593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1967928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018859065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000318286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032390629","doi":"10.1111/jonm.13038","title":"Trends in high‐impact papers in nursing research published from 2008 to 2018: A web of science‐based bibliometric analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Nursing research; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Impact factor; Web of science; Citation analysis; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; MEDLINE; Nursing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5132470776187895,"score_gpt":0.6032668532435289,"score_spread":0.0900197756247394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032390629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668023,0.00065089524,0.0017143592,0.012337232,0.00054238696,0.00023634112,0.000025275662,0.000006835512,0.017684361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416244,0.00010396824,0.005412936,0.000117590935,0.00008159356,0.0000025169225,0.0000027305427,0.000012395989,0.00010385383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739723,0.0006936864,0.0020592306,0.00092062616,0.021174593,0.0011795706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917018,0.0022836358,0.00078162446,0.00080963934,0.0032219107,0.0012014145],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048432235,0.0002107357,0.00095079484,0.90734196,0.00018937106,0.002900207,0.0044828705,0.00009674045,0.0009770882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017747695,0.00015325677,0.00044785521,0.9666238,0.0007102143,0.0013400102,0.00036703344,0.0007301089,0.000020043262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044426246,0.0012856075,0.16408585,0.000005623093,0.00010713327,0.00015610825,0.0007295209,0.020396797,0.0022721088,0.00014833143,0.035304114,0.7750645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014931663,0.00080853753,0.9636149,0.00022459675,0.00006622921,0.0000012803753,0.0015708624,0.029479155,0.0002192311,0.0015293375,0.00082839426,0.00016430242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021402125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000196144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021070484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060798525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993616},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3032439792","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00069","title":"Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Demography; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Subject (documents); Citation impact; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8348130930551083,"score_gpt":0.6305721392040463,"score_spread":0.204240953851062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032439792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813337,0.00107746,0.0007177198,0.014955845,0.00033813348,0.0004001901,0.000042767893,0.000039297072,0.0010948937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922109,0.00039946107,0.006051345,0.0004713231,0.00004593384,0.00004663883,9.5021755e-7,0.000013496127,0.00075991714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98816544,0.00031270066,0.0008233038,0.0014933334,0.00820016,0.0010050888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879936,0.006652274,0.00047289007,0.00038670044,0.0040709274,0.00042360305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018422054,0.0002750654,0.0006211698,0.01649531,0.0011832215,0.0018028023,0.0018454916,0.00014391188,0.000085581276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116385885,0.00015605493,0.00008096556,0.13894479,0.0022113558,0.0024910865,0.00087786367,0.0007819988,0.00013615159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092820125,0.00015194384,0.8273072,0.00012030534,0.00014722228,0.00015168251,0.12705043,0.0018032639,0.009342682,0.011055621,0.008480121,0.0134613225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008344953,0.0009985223,0.88622636,0.00010732335,0.00001657551,0.000003961986,0.09607361,0.0049186475,0.007110863,0.0026094068,0.0006085588,0.00049167423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006550934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068289344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12244948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032256215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004453522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034475429","doi":"","title":"Mathematics ≠ Science: A study in citation rates over time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.22701131767768357,"score_gpt":0.4646095983762427,"score_spread":0.23759828069855915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034475429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960697,0.00003448664,0.0005590047,0.00007727022,0.00010932138,0.0003775805,0.000006669681,0.0000099676245,0.002755991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580145,0.000007823416,0.0015202984,0.00001266383,0.0000055346763,1.2665204e-7,0.0000011405449,0.000004116261,0.0026468222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417037,0.000099445846,0.00026256306,0.0004928404,0.0046490883,0.00032569366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674606,0.0011924041,0.00021391359,0.0005469193,0.0011524251,0.00014825254],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011346893,0.00008764867,0.00027516633,0.03529622,0.00015678485,0.0003119202,0.0020726218,0.00005502825,0.0013958017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028424344,0.00008123445,0.00007123664,0.105354846,0.0002571595,0.0009069466,0.00061767804,0.00014343466,0.0015314046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014975028,0.0031963168,0.6014586,0.00003932138,0.000058681024,0.00008412563,0.3147578,0.0010803732,0.05255324,0.0022857399,0.0003506777,0.023985337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016138752,0.00034688346,0.6886344,0.000013595748,0.00000845322,0.0000019008281,0.20665632,0.09913317,0.0003809489,0.0027162074,0.00030274686,0.00019147716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011074534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015604196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10810149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006919859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018131803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037031294","doi":"10.22541/au.159335823.30845711","title":"Concerns That 10,000 Faculty Nationally and Internationally Have About Research Impact: Isn’t It All Academic Research Impact (ARI) If It Comes From The Academy?      ","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Scholarship; Alliance; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.9039217106237523,"score_gpt":0.7146205931596261,"score_spread":0.18930111746412615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037031294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53064096,0.009079748,0.0014477168,0.36661014,0.0010649931,0.004647319,0.018278757,0.0001639257,0.068066426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420217,0.008697063,0.00048349347,0.0025708776,0.0012778675,0.00019623943,0.00091872795,0.000088688874,0.043745317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9243246,0.0045314794,0.002517383,0.004233344,0.06145161,0.002941586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8962847,0.080461286,0.0009791249,0.0021282865,0.017671729,0.0024748745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11380991,0.0009155423,0.0013973037,0.046913236,0.0014685229,0.015865419,0.019881867,0.002061098,0.030475404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12969087,0.0005141948,0.000887952,0.065954484,0.002616223,0.0015047186,0.025905935,0.015338729,0.0024288052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025548018,0.00010234278,0.1416485,0.000015028923,0.00047359176,0.000029176052,0.0024433187,0.00029409782,0.00025188658,0.0017250013,0.83719647,0.015565106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010734862,0.00029785722,0.6207302,0.00016241818,0.000025541232,0.000012797237,0.0038752302,0.033145808,0.00024998738,0.08583749,0.25387955,0.0007096126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013665136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006277866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5833169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023313826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043291384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037107203","doi":"10.1177/0959354320930826","title":"Open peer commentaries in <i>Theory &amp; Psychology</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Focus (optics); Key (lock); Psychology; Discursive psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Discourse analysis; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7518767381190462,"score_gpt":0.6737853698578182,"score_spread":0.07809136826122798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037107203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29584143,0.0016522153,0.036454998,0.24326871,0.0024502464,0.0011751112,0.0001389136,0.00010846333,0.4189099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86755276,0.00015684789,0.00172354,0.12501878,0.00016665687,0.000047167217,0.000022351674,0.000031074585,0.0052808467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892597,0.0034965528,0.0011531907,0.0016595863,0.003399193,0.001031757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874396,0.009193344,0.00027409632,0.0016124884,0.00090437627,0.0005761249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055722788,0.0002566575,0.0006472575,0.013887128,0.00021490215,0.001310391,0.009383465,0.00026717526,0.013421137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040678542,0.00019475052,0.00014506523,0.07070487,0.0008455025,0.00047692913,0.0024258695,0.0007846801,0.0064078905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015224509,0.00041945936,0.061470855,0.0000030178574,0.00003590634,0.00006129317,0.0018627036,0.000004870627,0.0015381208,0.13271807,0.64305574,0.15730754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012473378,0.00021674136,0.040510617,0.0000023205691,0.0000036316512,0.000015162901,0.00031002032,0.00001016498,0.000042353644,0.4711201,0.48636776,0.00015381436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003598605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054473938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5717113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004693169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096946365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037370937","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v15i1.5870","title":"La Fédération des milieux documentaires (FMD) : une fédération d’associations et d’institutions.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.5395703661191669,"score_gpt":0.5521733356276226,"score_spread":0.012602969508455741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037370937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045850374,0.014949542,0.00086190476,0.8293194,0.00035574415,0.0003993928,0.00009039186,0.000007775915,0.10816544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97221845,0.01833623,0.0007094519,0.0070041255,0.00025337058,0.0000058033897,0.000028003322,0.0000073062283,0.0014372598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919436,0.0033493182,0.00095949066,0.00017577856,0.0030278703,0.00054393045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849334,0.010322767,0.0006076763,0.00019233892,0.0023282692,0.0016155571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026986517,0.00013362843,0.00020713308,0.0084692985,0.0024456042,0.012457616,0.00076203584,0.00021995482,0.0003097764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045106787,0.00009242711,0.000078097306,0.033079583,0.0015285055,0.06384813,0.00019255457,0.001439891,0.00011084734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019453748,0.000062073035,0.012234588,0.00010688797,0.00011832392,0.00006849035,0.034242228,0.0005787815,0.000013566497,0.69234747,0.09521441,0.16481867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004513588,0.00038860546,0.013845379,0.000060475322,0.000030250127,0.00018124003,0.02442069,0.002317743,0.000079954785,0.009652084,0.9484604,0.00011179581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00270087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013105915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92636806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010678442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070326496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037396094","doi":"10.1017/9781108783521","title":"Reading Peer Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Science and Technology Facilities Council; KU Leuven; Yale University; University of Stirling; Curtin University of Technology; Leverhulme Trust; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Monash University; University of Sussex; Birkbeck, University of London; University of Southampton; Queen Mary University of London; Royal Society; University of Bedfordshire; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; University of Cambridge; University of the Arts London; King's College London; Simon Fraser University; University of Chicago; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National Institutes of Health; Canterbury Christ Church University; Coventry University","keywords":"Reading (process); Element (criminal law); Political radicalism; Politics; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4952485308698015,"score_gpt":0.46546838736760804,"score_spread":0.029780143502193435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037396094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036046433,0.0033290773,0.0007306726,0.0011182305,0.00051791524,0.00061366695,0.00053099217,0.00008946754,0.9930664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000023554137,0.004251817,0.00014794532,0.0008137846,0.00023475212,9.0192293e-7,0.00008460184,0.00003454848,0.9944081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98205763,0.000339366,0.00063891476,0.001444721,0.014872164,0.0006472056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689765,0.0021641434,0.00062726875,0.0015507513,0.0078019816,0.0009582191],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009592352,0.00039516453,0.0009853408,0.01815581,0.0003284519,0.0011770815,0.005783799,0.00040723325,0.000072620634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018690284,0.00035318642,0.0005879797,0.008981583,0.00029584405,0.00030004984,0.0030430823,0.0011388777,0.0007042193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014349241,0.000007785372,0.000007838398,0.00017281553,0.0000395709,0.00037063754,0.000010133799,2.5282532e-7,0.0000063738557,0.09078804,0.8980049,0.010577286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024019586,0.000057135156,0.000035444667,0.00041998544,0.00008635573,0.0000121296225,0.000020202226,0.00011523745,0.00003462113,0.000030006868,0.99855924,0.00038945064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049442177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8247914e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10055432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060435775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010565051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038893329","doi":"","title":"Rapport d'expertise de projets soumis à la Fondation Canadienne pour l’Innovation","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.2044615997515577,"score_gpt":0.402441819651307,"score_spread":0.1979802198997493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038893329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5302269,0.0017376662,0.30725503,0.040822603,0.0008667233,0.0011794607,0.0002283737,0.00019052556,0.11749276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.796982,0.0062065474,0.055433933,0.00028930866,0.00010909869,0.00019308286,0.0006253841,0.000097150805,0.14006351],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742643,0.013572349,0.0024185746,0.0025396377,0.005270048,0.0019350741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536062,0.011256424,0.0019342406,0.004059787,0.027932337,0.0012110394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08438084,0.00074250484,0.0008930177,0.023819301,0.0014377391,0.003978026,0.0056024175,0.0010309824,0.0013534899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07618533,0.00074432726,0.0004805004,0.07300965,0.0010687313,0.00092931546,0.0031643156,0.001673123,0.0005374048],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040887426,0.001737179,0.02201077,0.000108966306,0.00012946673,0.00009103513,0.017980779,0.00023779063,0.0091756275,0.100059904,0.03741692,0.81101066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024393958,0.0000057103316,0.12175611,0.0014936671,0.000088204695,0.00035759024,0.0015408506,0.21280745,0.052467544,0.024525527,0.58056957,0.001948393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022985859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005055411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8090623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014740924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006488927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038981544","doi":"10.7554/elife.60438","title":"Ways to increase equity, diversity and inclusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Racism; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7864795108863052,"score_gpt":0.5846512036689153,"score_spread":0.20182830721738987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038981544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96955544,0.00023644054,0.008179222,0.011563673,0.000120650875,0.00014089601,0.000023073067,0.000027445785,0.010153134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929178,0.00006510188,0.00089446345,0.0058798506,0.00009456696,9.860858e-7,7.975916e-7,0.0000033309295,0.00014313753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902923,0.00006425064,0.00023068367,0.00049520284,0.008612008,0.000305519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640816,0.0011217948,0.00005455976,0.0002814417,0.00086976297,0.0012642492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009669363,0.00007619157,0.00016496741,0.009437956,0.0023932632,0.00054584915,0.0019093677,0.000048870068,0.00036340964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042102296,0.000054383156,0.000045463574,0.07472676,0.000056090357,0.0002866526,0.18194747,0.00012838516,0.00058943674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012400889,0.00010761089,0.4177611,0.0000085507645,0.000010082536,0.00007615272,0.0073015536,0.00002761648,0.0037728949,0.004153583,0.22323614,0.3434207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013942372,0.00093117094,0.51650167,0.000010840243,0.000011351619,0.0000064377496,0.0006020128,0.013331576,0.0043544946,0.034254313,0.42804968,0.00055222923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026592863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000127939775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34286848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003975817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050725797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039713805","doi":"10.1101/2020.07.01.181669","title":"Task specialization across research careers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universidade da Coruña; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; European Commission","keywords":"Archetype; Task (project management); Diversity (politics); Psychology; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.47951111242403965,"score_gpt":0.5153232605362955,"score_spread":0.03581214811225586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039713805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96702456,0.0030276973,0.014695078,0.0042999075,0.0063542104,0.0020518682,0.001679738,0.00045867506,0.00040824112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533206,0.00065718166,0.0018732917,0.00023711365,0.0015863068,0.00012330296,7.053149e-7,0.000121675774,0.00006835168],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716576,0.0013768651,0.001568828,0.0033318272,0.019989818,0.0020750903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97397256,0.0027751543,0.0007367178,0.0037352967,0.017128142,0.0016521593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043159958,0.00060017215,0.000998729,0.030319473,0.00097552186,0.011166525,0.007738835,0.001009507,0.00040887666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078259446,0.00053958205,0.00039331397,0.1785133,0.0006916045,0.00063009094,0.008144197,0.0028048935,0.0023639633],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021732869,0.0008074404,0.16567099,0.00047907175,0.0003682647,0.00084435416,0.00038892875,0.00061624235,0.6047465,0.008865022,0.21659744,0.0003983929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00124648,0.0003250914,0.529924,0.00023893433,0.000041821197,2.9094565e-8,0.00016808145,0.008064916,0.11826159,0.00048142782,0.33910996,0.0021376966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025334957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000124339595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48648494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010030406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022992555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042696781","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10911","title":"Leveraging Tweets, Citations, and Social Networks to Improve Bibliometrics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"JAMA Network Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Data science; Information retrieval; Computer science; Altmetrics; Social network analysis; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5134223927168502,"score_gpt":0.5263683747941194,"score_spread":0.012945982077269158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042696781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010642329,0.002449663,0.020124253,0.9628044,0.003050348,0.0020377168,0.0002031903,0.00007349391,0.008192738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018800583,0.00087247096,0.0057947403,0.94527,0.02006411,0.00018681218,0.00028389,0.00014158721,0.0085857855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804852,0.0012288933,0.0017615835,0.0027623456,0.011657154,0.0021048225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98007905,0.013509816,0.0009440559,0.0012300896,0.0034411317,0.0007958354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026187684,0.00063470023,0.0014333081,0.14136192,0.0014089993,0.045775212,0.0107804835,0.0012355662,0.00058379926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0225424,0.0005248545,0.00030982596,0.57991046,0.00020680658,0.0015382197,0.011501262,0.0040467675,0.00066387944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040435076,0.000015594658,0.005447405,0.000015902475,0.00006573945,0.00020044437,0.0001448266,0.0002686627,0.0000011770503,0.000064268024,0.8488158,0.14491975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060227234,0.00018016413,0.021491583,0.000038853406,0.00003183966,0.000007714544,0.00012880987,0.009898434,0.0000012083713,0.0049656485,0.96196544,0.0006880378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023055125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009629142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43854854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025949077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047185985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043477317","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.003","title":"Editorial – Revisiting Open Access Publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6657408547549513,"score_gpt":0.5783386524786365,"score_spread":0.08740220227631479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043477317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7042263,0.0046061166,0.053914633,0.045119654,0.08148478,0.0028026213,0.004086951,0.000580758,0.10317816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90222,0.00091785553,0.0037771112,0.0029298938,0.08902653,0.000014301299,0.00084696175,0.000047935715,0.00021942542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909772,0.00057720987,0.0008109547,0.0016995249,0.0051383646,0.0007966886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901893,0.005780017,0.00045090294,0.0018776715,0.0006897321,0.0010123571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022849085,0.0002345163,0.00047706335,0.0044026556,0.00082239456,0.07766456,0.034497794,0.000109404915,0.0001322828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012322505,0.00016900446,0.00005677033,0.055118136,0.00010771759,0.016038371,0.04689272,0.0006679194,0.00006794729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120007586,0.000031702442,0.1278676,0.0000741347,0.000037281898,0.000017506305,0.0014711085,0.00035402988,0.00022759668,0.00024366255,0.5016536,0.36790177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005254287,0.000054766817,0.031232662,0.00009354125,0.000013978192,0.0000042063,0.0010322222,0.3712893,0.000013256999,0.0022843243,0.593153,0.0003032744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014076817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021698307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3709353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023707846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014677155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044702960","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.013","title":"Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: a citation analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Publishing; Citation analysis; Medicine; Guideline; Bibliometrics; Citation impact; Web of science; MEDLINE; Library science; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Political science; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9883880526495334,"score_gpt":0.8212683432552055,"score_spread":0.16711970939432796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044702960","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34539166,0.0012654263,0.5673429,0.084982425,0.00058711256,0.00023991086,0.00002875163,0.000004986847,0.00015683565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487971,0.00072910805,0.14736924,0.0022131247,0.0007797178,0.0000033306703,0.000008318348,0.000008682234,0.000091401635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.83756566,0.047815293,0.093025,0.0021560348,0.016937248,0.0025007885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.091177784,0.7580022,0.07371744,0.0011226214,0.073594786,0.002385153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.74660784,0.0001269041,0.003831485,0.030158538,0.00018268498,0.00015348614,0.0014473282,0.00027957305,0.00020545564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9857547,0.00007515684,0.0018919818,0.1299754,0.0002874334,0.0004188049,0.00022807725,0.0008958499,0.000012765863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004407853,0.00014509053,0.6705056,0.000027469656,0.000475904,0.0000052009277,0.00012702346,0.015619052,0.00012491747,0.0022853527,0.16987681,0.1403668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097551435,0.004649951,0.6756068,0.000032190248,0.000085406085,0.000008539611,0.00048389588,0.18537937,0.000016160238,0.117562644,0.015101338,0.00009821258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023993294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008526804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74638784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099642886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019919404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98083377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045325153","doi":"10.1016/j.physa.2020.124959","title":"Scholar’s career switch adhesive with research topics: An evidence from China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Construct (python library); Similarity (geometry); Mechanism (biology); Bibliographic coupling; China; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Layer (electronics); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Political science; Mathematics; Nanotechnology","score_opus":0.6338376285454396,"score_gpt":0.5638238323392688,"score_spread":0.07001379620617076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045325153","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09447415,0.00081004354,0.88371646,0.017734742,0.0000449392,0.0013459533,0.0012154701,0.000056565917,0.0006016739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98703253,0.0002598136,0.01189991,0.00018680755,0.00026678632,0.00022892703,0.000027985765,0.000017845108,0.000079397956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926025,0.00032641413,0.00040686497,0.0011898172,0.0049520847,0.00052230695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910436,0.0042790663,0.000110312,0.0006888318,0.0028128214,0.0010653395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003640014,0.00016374787,0.0003064215,0.0019668713,0.0006848917,0.0018382482,0.0015671318,0.00007758682,0.0003124054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152940005,0.00011328937,0.00003655074,0.031171927,0.00008419648,0.0007070164,0.0006233429,0.0007144091,0.00035959278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008964348,0.0002966584,0.00046324258,0.000019223478,0.000032209442,0.000011821276,0.0010997488,0.00002092896,0.010848094,0.8035425,0.004701282,0.17887466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061115023,0.0018105293,0.028063864,0.0000388308,0.000044652,0.0000030338588,0.0016862258,0.38616097,0.0030133047,0.5240026,0.054000057,0.0005647867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015725943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002319798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047122285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021178799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045465353","doi":"10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x","title":"Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Library and Archives Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Criticism; Psychology; Peer review; Distress; Quality (philosophy); Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics education; Political science","score_opus":0.9673817885818834,"score_gpt":0.7461647558699385,"score_spread":0.22121703271194493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045465353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014885281,0.4935625,0.00005045821,0.497716,0.00010102688,0.00095039053,0.000038343336,0.000013497693,0.0060792402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058939535,0.91000986,0.00046329675,0.0150561575,0.0001351557,0.00012309782,0.000039027083,0.000019500996,0.015214379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498593,0.0039663813,0.0015310501,0.0012984726,0.042221934,0.0011228159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9106461,0.019385925,0.00046893634,0.002071377,0.065083556,0.0023441326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25013795,0.00020249546,0.0009250742,0.008662999,0.00032793128,0.0012434206,0.002727813,0.0001696129,0.0031372756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5492743,0.00012234043,0.00020982212,0.13140586,0.0003035171,0.00064895046,0.001693203,0.003785944,0.0014758512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011034542,0.000071570095,0.0076782317,0.004393061,0.0000059675685,0.00005068172,0.00011230916,6.5373314e-8,0.00002645376,0.0034633602,0.76126724,0.22292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017828967,0.00009213049,0.0071594594,0.008996517,0.0000049696573,0.000011904612,0.00014130969,0.00031865848,0.000016418873,0.002666689,0.9802539,0.00015979291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029022817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004969623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48265985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009824391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006506505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046526245","doi":"10.17613/h7y0z-s3q32","title":"Developing a persistent identifier roadmap for open access to UK research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jisc Repository (Jisc)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Austrian Science Fund; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Japan Science and Technology Agency; National Institutes of Health; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Glasgow; University of Oxford; University of St Andrews; University of Southampton; National Institute for Health and Care Research; CERN; Wellcome Trust; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; UK Research and Innovation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identifier; Work (physics); Service (business); Public relations; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.8897607284027292,"score_gpt":0.7040016995030572,"score_spread":0.185759028899672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046526245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241868,0.000601482,0.0034341044,0.0069806664,0.004221935,0.0041352264,0.000026189646,0.000039317267,0.05637423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592051,0.000020482674,0.0024386104,0.00038960157,0.00029702057,0.0003255972,0.000005606511,0.000032899967,0.13728502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835125,0.000497473,0.0011820581,0.0019670965,0.011436999,0.0014038464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839785,0.004852153,0.00030117322,0.002165673,0.0078589525,0.00084351987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03639457,0.00025371858,0.0005863013,0.03793294,0.001228628,0.03536102,0.015220978,0.00020992274,0.0006928502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017886324,0.00018613682,0.0003885864,0.10478364,0.00014781483,0.0024012437,0.010937934,0.00046730347,0.002125804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035569255,0.00029729126,0.23311767,0.000069943184,0.00013886327,0.000067958106,0.0009505664,0.00025578868,0.02251248,0.003298545,0.71249974,0.026435435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014411694,0.000916167,0.15939845,0.00012907035,0.000015093628,0.000047994323,0.0025726254,0.0025734468,0.03432075,0.0069070403,0.790871,0.0008071908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070193195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006150138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0809108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007568377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012843872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048164327","doi":"10.36834/cmej.70700","title":"Peer review: My article was rejected by the journal I edit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Peer review; Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19927227095285546,"score_gpt":0.53003668778467,"score_spread":0.33076441683181446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048164327","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032465585,0.043195292,0.000077499804,0.37684864,0.5766486,0.00016959186,0.00011158075,0.000005817282,0.00291055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011601937,0.052522283,0.00008770433,0.034827393,0.87166846,0.0000115536,0.000120274875,0.00004218031,0.040604137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93825966,0.001669157,0.0018460288,0.00055088697,0.05654001,0.0011342331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5475178,0.044130962,0.0063401433,0.004657604,0.2378898,0.1594637],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09186047,0.00031321394,0.0006300365,0.017206935,0.0014283528,0.0065460587,0.0077783917,0.00092660444,0.06961517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9237628,0.00017777355,0.0003431935,0.074795626,0.00038281878,0.0005736437,0.00022752753,0.008958812,0.0015618854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052264127,0.000041529885,0.000037849477,0.0000149866755,0.00002558626,0.00006713713,0.00016010266,1.6930044e-7,0.0000010158692,0.0000049105984,0.88190943,0.117732026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026061136,0.00009084135,0.00008879184,0.00047178485,0.000039760183,0.00060566457,0.00055896025,0.000069658825,0.0000016562559,0.0007598811,0.9968371,0.00021529531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031119916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028499027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8319023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013584959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19184965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049588163","doi":"10.1177/0961000620948573","title":"On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Information science; Library science; Documentation science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.21682604463760077,"score_gpt":0.44240869001076066,"score_spread":0.2255826453731599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049588163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97363466,0.00006137271,0.0027065647,0.013578157,0.00020150107,0.00012934869,0.00000557864,0.0000043382825,0.009678481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855894,0.00013225774,0.0005347018,0.00073588645,0.000027290735,7.3381597e-7,5.324057e-7,0.0000010798584,0.000008607074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941429,0.0000740171,0.0010122275,0.00012048386,0.004434973,0.00021539396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971583,0.0007971892,0.00081016007,0.00017086828,0.0007644904,0.00029901112],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009736734,0.000075671865,0.0001589739,0.018810244,0.00028739724,0.0035283186,0.001438503,0.000040864215,0.000042789863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020988913,0.000042199215,0.000033225213,0.078432925,0.0007135719,0.11895049,0.0002830769,0.00024525568,0.000006886946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014863629,0.00002527948,0.17567104,0.000021950229,0.000001992457,6.7458797e-7,0.007509119,0.00034292164,0.00084593135,0.74995285,0.00044452873,0.06503508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003262855,0.0003096793,0.95591444,0.00002341796,0.0000013684424,0.0000071791737,0.0033187352,0.027153395,0.0017971674,0.008826379,0.0022569408,0.00006501446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005970669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5178644e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7802434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004028895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009314887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750614},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3081549561","doi":"10.17269/s41997-020-00411-5","title":"Money down the drain: predatory publishing in the COVID-19 era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Publishing; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economics; Political science; Business; Medicine; Virology; Law; Internal medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7656915835821335,"score_gpt":0.5525639252327351,"score_spread":0.2131276583493984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081549561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06560668,0.0038352662,0.003250929,0.9234625,0.0005333995,0.00027089025,0.00008024472,0.0000042958154,0.002955794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747429,0.00012079213,0.00012288167,0.12453345,0.00036951312,0.0000029313242,0.0000019729903,0.000007230472,0.0000982919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98673326,0.0029110094,0.0014176224,0.00038241016,0.0071977023,0.0013580266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96806544,0.011460744,0.0012491415,0.001046498,0.003571636,0.014606555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14958501,0.00012132062,0.0003318784,0.026845967,0.0008027015,0.015073267,0.007234858,0.00010093304,0.00084261614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33145794,0.000059554182,0.00015186555,0.12506019,0.0002847518,0.0024789618,0.00014264793,0.0015936241,0.00004666785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029896912,0.000016380076,0.0874515,0.0000077395935,0.000008317721,0.00012232501,0.011086242,0.000069355716,9.119802e-7,0.0038703505,0.8113154,0.08604845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302347,0.00015224742,0.077321194,0.000003205857,7.824733e-7,0.00009270509,0.0092568435,0.00064140395,2.442069e-7,0.0021595105,0.90997636,0.00006529459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031430554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06666585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8091363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011735354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045556605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082307966","doi":"10.1075/jerpp.20008.faz","title":"Gray areas of academic publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Publishing; Computer science; Library science; Computer graphics (images); Art history; Art; Medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.783837671672554,"score_gpt":0.6282425791465481,"score_spread":0.1555950925260059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082307966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63037306,0.011419726,0.03993861,0.2370226,0.0041647153,0.0042944076,0.0006135753,0.00012545876,0.07204785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956066,0.0003983001,0.0015635007,0.00030989977,0.0014778147,0.000026032056,0.000010840923,0.000018940975,0.00058806746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97830474,0.0007721667,0.0022055649,0.00050916994,0.017415108,0.0007932478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76114863,0.02334664,0.0023315512,0.00085397,0.21035448,0.0019647365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.092371,0.00012746987,0.000493822,0.04243122,0.00025579287,0.0056971335,0.0063444558,0.0002259968,0.00036787416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.838713,0.00008773086,0.0003526082,0.12426517,0.00033801628,0.0076075103,0.0007421243,0.0015694054,0.000023096482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022789046,0.00018074134,0.03974368,0.00004458166,0.00004248954,0.0000026065459,0.0012615079,0.000046753325,0.0016464406,0.021825276,0.85200745,0.08297058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010148849,0.0009058231,0.013827957,0.000022156059,0.0000071200116,0.0000048066936,0.002771727,0.0011155306,0.0057350104,0.014680006,0.9597951,0.000119861186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009803074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014185969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74634194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012965646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082822271","doi":"10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0082","title":"Evaluating Journal Impact Factor: a systematic survey of the pros and cons, and overview of alternative measures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital; Impact; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Quality (philosophy); Data science; Information retrieval; Medical physics; Medicine; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.7686354890913598,"score_gpt":0.5833849753578085,"score_spread":0.18525051373355128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082822271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95640785,0.0423126,0.00048109013,0.00032979972,0.00005895955,0.00025706747,0.00014348389,0.0000014477699,0.000007735094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739134,0.0024013931,0.000084388026,0.000047878297,0.0000640283,9.4755916e-7,1.0330848e-7,0.000007205229,0.0000026930575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930778,0.0016483754,0.0012046198,0.00019556214,0.0036410159,0.00023263242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941994,0.0061918157,0.0015609498,0.00018633196,0.0021923038,0.0004486696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006556868,0.00015021021,0.0007668805,0.0015052177,0.00032726926,0.000585144,0.0008892889,0.000042677333,0.000022978764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028405184,0.000063230684,0.00019324351,0.0061961208,0.00039147842,0.00020577155,0.0006275726,0.00028391933,3.3246272e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000442107,0.0001763372,0.97889787,0.00077317964,0.00027283546,0.00001481213,0.0010450343,0.00006492609,0.004957097,0.00017584271,0.00014261508,0.013037364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006304746,0.0015697369,0.9902207,0.000546402,0.00011214398,0.00010895579,0.00036863983,0.004716993,0.00013979436,0.0014953741,0.0000122157135,0.00007851968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008596095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019674748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040983547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045034336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030193775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97977895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083346991","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: APA 6th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Style (visual arts); Library science; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.47545432765403034,"score_gpt":0.5455816070485985,"score_spread":0.07012727939456814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083346991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003576227,0.002916635,0.07128319,0.008834495,0.01388076,0.0009531382,0.0013057125,0.0002779081,0.90019053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043414426,0.004328348,0.004486645,0.001407969,0.0050971415,0.0000805031,0.00036474192,0.00009691227,0.9797963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96864265,0.00056300487,0.0024405997,0.0020509392,0.025059672,0.0012431405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678776,0.015789364,0.001239453,0.0022885008,0.011959639,0.00084541616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035236,0.00054296094,0.00092490116,0.13908674,0.00045573764,0.00677437,0.0057603843,0.00092565437,0.023689862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13045485,0.00031194492,0.00056275574,0.16583265,0.00034200883,0.0018417685,0.0013760347,0.00065397564,0.013293225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071568397,0.000049246406,0.00040605277,0.000012550838,0.000023110535,0.000011954969,0.000025225803,0.0000018426845,0.000084335166,0.0011046613,0.7994107,0.19886313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042086755,0.00018558926,0.0015527372,0.000077515986,0.0000142506215,0.00000789058,0.00022275264,0.0003826618,0.00034946753,0.027455362,0.9688392,0.00049166096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000261491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056814624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19837148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049460144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011087275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085773434","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03701-4","title":"Classifications of science and their effects on bibliometric evaluations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Discipline; Computer science; Order (exchange); Scientometrics; Data science; Management science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.7109975348963583,"score_gpt":0.6052004678785627,"score_spread":0.10579706701779557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085773434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584671,0.0018010407,0.015508568,0.006252912,0.0009798473,0.00080519146,0.000109729306,0.00006972911,0.01600584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732786,0.00022836008,0.0014276943,0.000704391,0.0000775168,0.00001650636,0.0000020265197,0.000012949771,0.00020271848],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97100896,0.00027035672,0.0009563715,0.0014909594,0.02539883,0.00087450776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954363,0.020154089,0.0006719414,0.0015405224,0.021138715,0.0021317252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051733702,0.00023036069,0.00046877345,0.7541529,0.0008370977,0.0026323958,0.0044707567,0.00010571961,0.00013385898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47328752,0.0001524147,0.00013477568,0.9758922,0.0022002042,0.0011055275,0.0012804038,0.0003460488,0.00030472918],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017930486,0.00023700253,0.04966729,0.000027419452,0.000012982932,0.0000019753488,0.00082057185,0.00007261092,0.03295281,0.0068160673,0.011856916,0.8975164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096274173,0.0012779959,0.8464807,0.000016948537,0.000014289269,0.0000042175593,0.00089704257,0.045960482,0.07213408,0.0041855546,0.027683962,0.00038194374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010497166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.668176e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8971345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020955995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010478008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087051796","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.12572","title":"Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Citation; Scopus; Medicine; Observational study; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Library science; Subject (documents); Epidemiology; Public health; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Political science; Computer science; Nursing; Pathology","score_opus":0.8631862053463923,"score_gpt":0.6652655756134336,"score_spread":0.19792062973295876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087051796","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031401573,0.9928992,0.0008388589,0.0011819549,0.0005211517,0.00048388628,0.00029430227,0.000037142996,0.00060337543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071281046,0.9900192,0.00068454223,0.0012037754,0.00010152727,0.000030241783,0.0004350712,0.000029477404,0.00036803266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95507586,0.032222807,0.0054257633,0.0015027574,0.0036914228,0.002081411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974757,0.09313728,0.0033030128,0.002357427,0.0011879106,0.0025386796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13597116,0.0006869917,0.007226857,0.6848911,0.0012161877,0.001885451,0.006799218,0.0010265738,0.0011061805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30609053,0.00049859344,0.0013680931,0.9152322,0.0007664727,0.000525199,0.0042624963,0.005269787,0.00019365187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004669547,0.00017097329,0.16515982,0.00042670273,0.00035846673,0.00011374351,0.000032014497,0.000002914979,8.497287e-8,0.0001385829,0.0067084087,0.8268836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999811,0.00022049122,0.12302691,0.00029421347,0.0002219451,0.00036253207,0.00037409062,0.0006771074,2.2417714e-8,0.0011140263,0.8729904,0.00041822935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020160328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010464157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86628205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050222926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011637559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087208738","doi":"10.1111/beer.12318","title":"BE:ER is beyond suppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics A European Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Conversation; Impact factor; Analytics; Citation; Media studies; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Data science; Law","score_opus":0.8419737768635476,"score_gpt":0.6014730456877927,"score_spread":0.24050073117575488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087208738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021734678,0.2060564,0.008196872,0.64155114,0.0010641819,0.0010582873,0.0001493272,0.00015776996,0.13959253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10736025,0.5327946,0.0026674129,0.35005587,0.0007413001,0.000016997441,0.000047073245,0.00013794094,0.0061785765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842951,0.0019573462,0.001236841,0.0012012551,0.010728688,0.0005807545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861678,0.0035672688,0.0004657916,0.0013102855,0.0077063306,0.00078251824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038129274,0.00026544728,0.00062964484,0.0056138528,0.00036704654,0.0017555447,0.003830458,0.00012328083,0.00413252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15422575,0.00016988549,0.00025056442,0.15242295,0.00021726108,0.00052777276,0.0020678753,0.0011586614,0.005744938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009520683,0.000066342705,0.00094455824,0.00096423604,0.000011614218,0.00011403783,0.00038827723,0.0000044488547,0.0003324537,0.0011162456,0.81041914,0.18562911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020705137,0.000036647085,0.009267593,0.00055505114,0.000018264585,0.000009693211,0.000024405233,0.000282981,0.00007328323,0.000511559,0.98877054,0.000242934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.484113e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32673818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002698942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032685592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088110085","doi":"10.1002/asi.24472","title":"The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Excellence; China; Political science; Regional science; Economic growth; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.2331593821368919,"score_gpt":0.5033470671943766,"score_spread":0.2701876850574847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088110085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546266,0.000827258,0.00197903,0.0389619,0.0021531244,0.0005021435,0.00007392707,0.000006497124,0.0008694823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985367,0.0005565044,0.0006787104,0.00006553896,0.00002541523,0.000011877055,0.0000010410893,0.0000014003609,0.000122818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911141,0.00009704022,0.0015531171,0.00015320152,0.0068045044,0.00027803733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972359,0.0029986135,0.0038164586,0.00039320675,0.020363458,0.00006928097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050353132,0.00008141617,0.00027263988,0.023639988,0.0006604472,0.0013302292,0.0031560217,0.0006140887,0.0000025959293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2993588,0.000043111464,0.00013622944,0.06731717,0.0006459874,0.0020631128,0.001536077,0.0014347845,0.0000020224993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042759348,0.000104835766,0.74050677,0.00003112297,0.000060617236,4.845526e-7,0.0013758118,0.005232483,0.00097189797,0.045955606,0.0096826,0.19603503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017569894,0.00013359195,0.6224186,0.00013156058,0.000031036197,0.000026134714,0.0065142554,0.053300254,0.0068386607,0.08111022,0.22750641,0.00023228045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001229748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003612735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24900566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075080694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002830283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088224047","doi":"10.29173/istl51","title":"Investigating Science Researchers’ Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workflow; World Wide Web; Library science; Meaning (existential); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.8119318843063014,"score_gpt":0.5884236921038694,"score_spread":0.223508192202432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088224047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683268,0.00024138796,0.000003634052,0.022127355,0.00006301602,0.00080152816,0.000012194782,0.00004201043,0.008382074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986781,0.0000827553,0.00080147746,0.00010020771,0.000023112992,0.000009433203,1.5999922e-7,0.00000742504,0.00029732898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844756,0.00061368436,0.0005887578,0.0018457203,0.010908327,0.0015678845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884253,0.0040489594,0.00017515256,0.0012285688,0.004505075,0.0016169371],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057504483,0.00015844306,0.00034607004,0.18352504,0.0016628574,0.0013484854,0.00866662,0.00025407624,0.00007405442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21500394,0.00013061495,0.00001968507,0.61516756,0.013475418,0.003029451,0.0034725391,0.002019863,0.00007311009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021005548,0.00014651942,0.9277851,0.000012275211,0.000003372806,0.0018179092,0.013255403,0.000016261582,0.0073927795,0.023469517,0.0020539463,0.0240259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247001,0.006022593,0.16363262,0.00019608246,0.000006654446,0.00029677938,0.71504897,0.031776134,0.026748173,0.03656674,0.016664214,0.00079403445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030120898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008162551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76415247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028609208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058818655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088999864","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Entrepreneurship: In Ottawa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Political science","score_opus":0.9595516944596619,"score_gpt":0.7220228475040606,"score_spread":0.23752884695560128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088999864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006280755,0.015115898,0.00058160536,0.010277511,0.0023297693,0.0012055591,0.00021778463,0.00014200542,0.9638491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008094634,0.007831132,0.021495074,0.0010474351,0.0015433311,0.00017475942,0.000102436534,0.00015081486,0.9595604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9041153,0.023021448,0.0049064886,0.004655262,0.058222,0.005079466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.801135,0.14934206,0.0010780691,0.007249916,0.03787307,0.0033218665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53013927,0.0006452108,0.0014631393,0.23840904,0.00031740923,0.008422934,0.016415149,0.002884113,0.007585269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7199547,0.00045490495,0.00046834475,0.40010273,0.0008096902,0.0008862103,0.0048356643,0.0064708,0.005117612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023649092,0.00018102358,0.023913201,0.00002342496,0.00001807774,0.00017266655,0.0002481463,0.000025388465,0.000055861787,0.00091731135,0.86308557,0.11133571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045432325,0.00020627538,0.0028045059,0.000095339026,0.000005192058,0.000021310108,0.0013429302,0.0007088338,0.00037181092,0.16756666,0.82595867,0.00046413482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009110507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029751167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18981543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004411925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009525208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089103538","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/8hp7m","title":"The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; Santa Clara University; Harvard University","keywords":"Productivity; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Promotion (chess); Preprint; Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Medicine; Politics; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.7447279426623729,"score_gpt":0.600916010677361,"score_spread":0.14381193198501185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089103538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163307,0.009117791,0.023811957,0.106750935,0.017021528,0.007831579,0.00023686956,0.0002371804,0.018661503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883822,0.00048573653,0.00011319711,0.0004367085,0.00020751789,0.000069008755,0.0000069248126,0.000016920678,0.010281766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97466624,0.0019374772,0.0010743688,0.002342602,0.019166932,0.00081237906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94261456,0.047653034,0.0009955888,0.0046127182,0.0032596572,0.0008644695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07369764,0.00033184176,0.0006120954,0.020768138,0.0015180281,0.007890017,0.010563529,0.00024647685,0.00021469651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32169628,0.00013205822,0.00048659535,0.13537835,0.001643238,0.00015386469,0.0075144265,0.0015196318,0.00041309276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002991763,0.000582616,0.033994175,0.0004988917,0.0002445914,0.000036707574,0.002243267,0.0013821397,0.0055262563,0.0128769325,0.6321601,0.31015512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010328206,0.000549961,0.076171786,0.0000549097,0.000063919615,0.000013024723,0.0014011861,0.013320648,0.0127991,0.3754511,0.51834625,0.00079527794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021875692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013657806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36257416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002862896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029798204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090451087","doi":"10.1111/ibi.12887","title":"Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ibis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ornithology; White (mutation); Visual arts; Art; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.8358054303363317,"score_gpt":0.6612376043798455,"score_spread":0.17456782595648623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090451087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852942,0.00015735443,0.0016192769,0.011439409,0.00008326739,0.00036814643,0.000059945232,0.0000037712755,0.0009745913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982758,0.00002258722,0.0013577949,0.00020665872,0.000015249717,0.000020791997,0.0000042795223,0.0000021459377,0.00009469189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721855,0.00028214775,0.0003806857,0.0003467165,0.0016271306,0.00014477449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956809,0.0021028018,0.00011661896,0.00017677622,0.0018295605,0.00009329754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016593542,0.000043135155,0.00015059118,0.006770276,0.000047515616,0.00019526614,0.0004097878,0.000050963583,0.0006593929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05275176,0.000030264657,0.00003215756,0.030478965,0.00006387111,0.0002085323,0.00016680943,0.000060974136,0.00001228706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006706206,0.000058066096,0.5982096,0.000010440888,0.0000062070235,6.60834e-7,0.00064585404,0.000021292668,0.0009131264,0.00016224838,0.02087887,0.37902656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009847058,0.0003103712,0.94144404,0.0000042252113,0.00000837609,7.5209374e-7,0.0004481272,0.029214162,0.0023026124,0.017392984,0.007818974,0.00007067208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024419516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048283666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3789559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029763905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012424876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091945448","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1216","title":"Advancing in the institutionalization of Evidence-Informed Policy in Brazil","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Evidence-based practice; Knowledge translation; Public relations; Evidence-based policy; Business; Scientific evidence; Political science; Nursing; Medicine; Knowledge management; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8408744498340404,"score_gpt":0.639742881482103,"score_spread":0.20113156835193735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091945448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46868604,0.0030744593,0.092422895,0.42534953,0.00033434958,0.00032942687,0.000008765544,0.0000059908934,0.009788538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936696,0.001377561,0.00072621304,0.0040313336,0.0001739352,2.5748713e-7,5.4739394e-7,0.0000041530952,0.00001636669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97494555,0.008934358,0.0037296512,0.0003516999,0.011166722,0.00087204174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934754,0.0031945608,0.0010716857,0.0002263609,0.0015218552,0.0005101331],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14838473,0.00006695327,0.0002575942,0.027100373,0.00007751754,0.0005033278,0.002016359,0.000014910419,0.00006606898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22096963,0.000034754208,0.00007668416,0.12725426,0.000092426024,0.0014784732,0.00018661426,0.0003587257,0.000026977777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019313888,0.00014727112,0.15975551,0.0000395744,0.0000044409912,0.0000753092,0.01082305,0.0011435208,0.00005585875,0.0039361124,0.012291834,0.8117082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007166992,0.0006149459,0.8436886,0.00009697218,4.410358e-7,0.0000330115,0.0026677607,0.0016076477,0.000008262459,0.0004109505,0.15009575,0.000058944595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082108025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051049577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81164926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026067146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038014466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091984948","doi":"10.3917/enic.027.0027","title":"Stratégies numériques de diffusion auprès des décideurs, des résultats des chercheurs en santé publique","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Enjeux de l information et de la communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.35600400407758664,"score_gpt":0.5158816207712876,"score_spread":0.15987761669370099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091984948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.636228,0.014283341,0.29620475,0.023751952,0.000082581624,0.00046606324,0.00009897281,0.00020427845,0.028680066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82027125,0.07272777,0.104764804,0.0018052781,0.00006380189,0.00005345718,0.00010661408,0.000025476016,0.00018157004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868054,0.0060913274,0.0013412585,0.00036599717,0.00243657,0.0010843249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786878,0.013086507,0.00065625744,0.0011201168,0.005565258,0.00088404433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02871815,0.00036449876,0.00040452456,0.0070913974,0.0011284867,0.007962376,0.0037586314,0.00070131494,0.00039713868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10719472,0.00034171494,0.00021523339,0.03201309,0.0018388812,0.01000952,0.0014077764,0.0014292457,0.00015086628],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103779385,0.00025920582,0.11025446,0.00040089802,0.000051752275,0.0000058966184,0.120052844,0.002453233,0.0023399752,0.061834455,0.0085100345,0.69373345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093297975,0.0002816604,0.44119725,0.00042784307,0.000027870252,0.00009777737,0.036576923,0.09131418,0.004000057,0.36217308,0.062414832,0.00055553677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00704763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008282269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69317794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014920824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017448649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093162091","doi":"10.1177/0306312720966649","title":"The financial market of ideas: A theory of academic social media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Studies of Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Construct (python library); Social media; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Social media analytics; Social science; Political science; Publishing; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.629742310229162,"score_gpt":0.585563795919583,"score_spread":0.04417851430957909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093162091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97641736,0.0076883817,0.0002896347,0.0069464752,0.0008436463,0.0002457551,0.000075288124,0.000010601987,0.0074828304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985624,0.0009601597,0.00009472751,0.00009784874,0.00020758383,0.0000045230504,8.7212634e-8,0.0000035224587,0.00006916061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875501,0.00030357396,0.0009919612,0.00045468533,0.010171436,0.00052823854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98004174,0.013090944,0.0008975629,0.00022107823,0.005583076,0.00016558579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039799787,0.00010986261,0.0005112019,0.004086672,0.0014652206,0.000109416076,0.0044134604,0.000089129404,0.000059615308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2600872,0.0000641402,0.00020849523,0.11731399,0.015601081,0.00034918435,0.0019422708,0.00028179435,0.0000073405595],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044002975,0.00010656913,0.01848758,0.000060814564,0.00007306983,0.0000025174093,0.08398984,0.000003370029,0.0126157915,0.16980289,0.06925807,0.6451595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006992559,0.0002888392,0.50784236,0.000020086909,0.000026068195,4.3110157e-7,0.11680338,0.00026382605,0.0071578785,0.36100194,0.0056366688,0.00025926536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009317563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010711234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058678397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006608139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093804023","doi":"10.1108/lht-06-2020-0131","title":"A bibliometric analysis and science mapping of scientific publications of Alzahra University during 1986–2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Originality; Ranking (information retrieval); Library science; Scientific literature; Data science; Computer science; Medicine; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Social science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.33417652347373894,"score_gpt":0.43836533492749663,"score_spread":0.10418881145375769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093804023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99144864,0.00048242568,0.0026773633,0.0017180298,0.00006115975,0.00015430702,0.00012780596,0.000048643862,0.0032816043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369335,0.00017082132,0.0045051114,0.00001891785,0.000011365487,6.011137e-7,0.000006532494,0.0000053058884,0.0015879646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263674,0.00009555966,0.0005785228,0.00090407685,0.005382686,0.00040242798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955205,0.0011651944,0.0004267458,0.00085782644,0.0014828937,0.000546855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005263601,0.000105270745,0.0003729937,0.79421437,0.0004605848,0.0016960652,0.003536855,0.00006479401,0.0004450536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009287046,0.00008845324,0.00016340589,0.97978556,0.0012393005,0.003964498,0.00236629,0.0001603687,0.00002296134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011141001,0.000073577474,0.93105024,0.00002131326,0.000041158746,0.0000021591409,0.00017983855,0.000018508266,0.04628126,0.0016258422,0.0015244617,0.019170487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018724122,0.00004408168,0.9617679,0.000004778127,0.000021092686,0.0000010479138,0.00037133088,0.004327313,0.02830207,0.00042138115,0.004450779,0.000100989346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038533442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.123255e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18557116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024173856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045813707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993403},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3094319664","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040950","title":"Cross-sectional analysis of bibliometrics and altmetrics: comparing the impact of qualitative and quantitative articles in the <i>British Medical Journal</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Percentile; Citation; Scopus; Web of science; Qualitative research; Percentile rank; Citation analysis; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Data science; Library science; Statistics; Social science; Internal medicine; Mann–Whitney U test","score_opus":0.8703207022660916,"score_gpt":0.7230511385471123,"score_spread":0.14726956371897926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094319664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99394757,0.001444809,0.001670112,0.001097371,0.000033049768,0.0008636587,0.000068728616,0.000001497199,0.00087322877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880785,0.00049961027,0.0004779067,0.000152051,0.000018395998,0.000021415759,0.0000019245097,0.000003936307,0.000016937642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98764956,0.0018786432,0.0013658605,0.00040979512,0.008394018,0.00030211845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95880336,0.03654347,0.0009090254,0.00037868682,0.0029644812,0.00040099406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.098536685,0.00010053712,0.00062056555,0.06369212,0.00035709288,0.008088953,0.00289138,0.00007200862,0.00025054105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16184278,0.00005163071,0.00020430291,0.5563347,0.00068985403,0.0007761987,0.0013818238,0.00037774132,0.000003139782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012394237,0.00009692421,0.9823117,0.000006027945,0.00023676358,0.000014500333,0.005122568,0.00046203638,0.0000198068,0.00036683437,0.0013542282,0.009884657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005767818,0.00034421775,0.9312813,0.0000104463,0.000024571189,0.000025214147,0.008858335,0.056652393,0.000014013793,0.0020959794,0.000049217935,0.00006751418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035779297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004329713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49264252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003223806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032830742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094933057","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.1.01","title":"Branding Spin-Off Scholarly Journals: Transmuting Symbolic Capital into Economic Capital","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Symbolic capital; Capital (architecture); Brand names; Economics; Sociology; Business; Marketing; History; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.41356925951913204,"score_gpt":0.49444687481835053,"score_spread":0.0808776152992185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094933057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362603,0.013574108,0.0063261455,0.03859217,0.0021225354,0.00018226258,0.000025828573,0.00003437593,0.0028822848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119204,0.0007807268,0.003828799,0.001377404,0.002627855,0.0000017038006,0.000001986485,0.000050298084,0.00013919438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97730964,0.00088042946,0.003816291,0.0009792516,0.015743338,0.0012710529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97641206,0.0038975514,0.0029762173,0.0006806119,0.012782716,0.0032508268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.081208214,0.0004063883,0.0011157347,0.045783035,0.0010938796,0.38480434,0.00935072,0.00049132016,0.0010934096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21422821,0.0003109451,0.0009110373,0.055435617,0.00018003325,0.2684317,0.0011196017,0.006642287,0.0003548753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032291154,0.00030412248,0.42947626,0.000049205137,0.00043614538,0.0007560959,0.019517861,0.0012508811,0.03519237,0.0035622187,0.03861015,0.47052178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01917906,0.0059255096,0.48460644,0.001046644,0.00036917045,0.004096103,0.08834781,0.023033326,0.009910591,0.10539662,0.2540143,0.004074398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014989925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020256859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46644738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008551513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015898688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095248707","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0240903","title":"Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Elite; Productivity; Geography; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.8224016831196271,"score_gpt":0.5038969817465725,"score_spread":0.31850470137305464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095248707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933458,0.00094230374,0.000007307091,0.0027595754,0.000023145045,0.00044299272,0.00003611598,0.0000041391445,0.0024386155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993793,0.00011448124,0.00018382125,0.000077929166,0.00004669444,0.000023703342,0.0000019010286,0.000004775691,0.00016740154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892379,0.0008128507,0.0003307646,0.0007787525,0.008301549,0.000538198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568343,0.0025647236,0.00006662747,0.0003372355,0.0010618825,0.0002860893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028249895,0.00008084379,0.00019580875,0.012838832,0.00020400126,0.0012990431,0.00074039947,0.00004997993,0.000050724808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046392266,0.000053219494,0.000013127208,0.11199833,0.00031414127,0.0003911806,0.00050165213,0.00052007823,0.000018161452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030617488,0.00032407203,0.97036153,0.00003608416,0.0000073774236,0.00004595821,0.007911205,0.0000011827431,0.0016354416,0.000027076967,0.0015545194,0.01806493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002627392,0.000059079946,0.99280983,0.00002206413,0.0000025142654,8.515035e-7,0.0014563251,0.001605587,0.0005143262,0.0028304681,0.00034730497,0.00008891794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0351767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12713663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099159494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008299947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033355097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095929879","doi":"10.17821/srels/2020/v57i3/148391","title":"Citation Trend of Byline and Dateline Articles of “The Guardian”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SRELS Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Guardian; Citation; Audience measurement; Psychology; Library science; Media studies; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.43724117568909476,"score_gpt":0.4921982558167358,"score_spread":0.054957080127641056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095929879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8749074,0.000470966,0.109385535,0.009990244,0.00035537747,0.00027422697,0.000047526155,0.000003773247,0.004565001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952502,0.0002688406,0.004167059,0.00024853882,0.000020294063,5.457783e-7,0.0000012067696,0.0000013123336,0.000041979965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534327,0.00006881132,0.0011658733,0.000055861525,0.0032701336,0.0000960417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.0002987603,0.0010819235,0.0001517613,0.0012846712,0.000104802326],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062371916,0.00004808021,0.00016378898,0.008110162,0.000041396557,0.00021533728,0.0006308305,0.000020148736,0.00010155225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004385275,0.000027151245,0.00008387744,0.027265817,0.00006744938,0.0011476041,0.0002566884,0.00008024527,0.000010179192],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009563641,0.00004869342,0.0126724485,0.00008227834,0.00006609913,0.000001638824,0.0016598306,0.0028598134,0.00048699905,0.0034605265,0.023125544,0.95544046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004703149,0.0012103628,0.6870519,0.00013584916,0.00011155156,0.000020487367,0.014667104,0.07597224,0.017393302,0.020794908,0.17767617,0.00026301848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025013437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.0876573e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013774485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024371411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095982673","doi":"10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8","title":"Mapping computer science research in Africa: using academic networking sites for assessing research activity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Sorel-Tracy; McGill University; Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Productivity; Regional science; Citation; Database; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9631006661554827,"score_gpt":0.7125945034653474,"score_spread":0.25050616269013537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095982673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8637369,0.0015064485,0.12793884,0.002325575,0.001346555,0.0012222466,0.000019279663,0.000057520676,0.0018466375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97701013,0.0001251243,0.021480111,0.00012202501,0.00108467,0.000032435328,0.000001533551,0.000035682977,0.00010826884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.93857133,0.0019790146,0.0014942025,0.003572211,0.04908288,0.005300357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358036,0.039815404,0.00046126448,0.0014232349,0.02029973,0.002196801],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35724887,0.0003184628,0.00071785616,0.3628614,0.003488654,0.014139009,0.009712496,0.00036351336,0.00004583602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17549501,0.0002680495,0.00021061009,0.8699734,0.0029378529,0.0041725324,0.0069283866,0.003294362,0.0001600016],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405911,0.00026224717,0.30351484,0.00008072893,0.000010980147,0.00004983738,0.0035727422,0.0039276974,0.07190828,0.00080173986,0.0074305055,0.6083663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000716686,0.00024894424,0.07240373,0.00008029723,0.0000021088524,0.00000570211,0.0015001611,0.89858246,0.0022431887,0.005976413,0.017829005,0.00041127906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008387188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000055212113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019534277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002632551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097147709","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.008","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of systematic review and meta analyses published in the top 5 “high-impact” radiology journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Imaging","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Medicine; Web of science; Citation; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Subject (documents); Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Science Citation Index; Citation impact; Library science; Medical physics; Pathology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9295006509261213,"score_gpt":0.7433835110658059,"score_spread":0.18611713986031542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097147709","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33167884,0.619911,0.0023034003,0.043165423,0.00022038339,0.0020861607,0.00003228316,0.0000132349505,0.00058926025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870316,0.009101408,0.00028315082,0.0034992716,0.00004103371,0.000026104195,0.0000022176523,0.000005705691,0.0000095463065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97630006,0.008407213,0.0039837044,0.0008089801,0.010037066,0.0004629865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168606,0.06696519,0.0027335032,0.0018793114,0.010792875,0.00076852046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24364275,0.00015405907,0.0019528335,0.18219563,0.000080945596,0.0019199161,0.0025066452,0.00007009001,0.0014274104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.62920517,0.00006661967,0.00051165,0.6898292,0.000244943,0.001013603,0.00043985585,0.00050360046,0.000031212723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002781417,0.00044106253,0.89598095,0.009086124,0.0013724123,0.000029887617,0.00022088975,0.0001806326,0.00009267481,0.00015185926,0.051017493,0.041398175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010979307,0.00018959964,0.95175254,0.0006500076,0.006994731,0.000029689147,0.0003356332,0.032637086,0.000013436317,0.006029839,0.00006199038,0.00020751591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004474915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011462483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6553527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000346136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021221161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097159753","doi":"10.7554/elife.60586","title":"Task specialization across research careers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; European Commission","keywords":"Archetype; Career path; Career Pathways; Task (project management); Career development; Psychology; Medical education; Management; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.9054869539191018,"score_gpt":0.7027200146581738,"score_spread":0.20276693926092804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097159753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073522,0.0011808773,0.011551249,0.029051436,0.0011826622,0.00053908804,0.00013207804,0.00010399467,0.048906405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960175,0.00014779507,0.00028490296,0.0009629821,0.0006827439,0.000006555142,0.000006155102,0.00001153106,0.0018798299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784653,0.00042391304,0.0004930461,0.00073646836,0.01909112,0.0007901347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901124,0.0025462974,0.00009288336,0.0005786132,0.0058517116,0.0008180466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027461663,0.00009216572,0.00020222826,0.012113532,0.00050515693,0.0030810905,0.0025036002,0.00010009888,0.0010491018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108603515,0.00006808356,0.00009537759,0.2383237,0.00023298414,0.00043851556,0.0011277529,0.0003868359,0.0052985637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041825308,0.000060020637,0.11835586,0.0000051717375,0.000009513739,0.00003936452,0.0032248492,0.00014740728,0.0028440692,0.0027605963,0.7688774,0.10363393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039339086,0.00019544637,0.071848005,0.0000031790387,9.904595e-7,0.0000014732756,0.0031809905,0.0072767073,0.0037318429,0.0017681544,0.911436,0.0001638299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008382935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024238941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22621018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009637068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021876162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097729089","doi":"","title":"Science to Action: Metrics for Societal Impact of Research—What Do We Value, and How Do We Capture It? Posters","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AGU Fall Meeting 2018","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Data science; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.546729190997117,"score_gpt":0.5950516069654634,"score_spread":0.04832241596834641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097729089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96251863,0.00802217,0.0010765262,0.023977961,0.0015225743,0.0008850224,0.00006906231,0.000030345336,0.0018977139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98565066,0.004594325,0.0066877655,0.0001285264,0.00039273678,0.000016501206,9.4900855e-7,0.000024505076,0.002504052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984301,0.0003635295,0.0005687995,0.0014101004,0.01188042,0.0014762043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97653943,0.009559197,0.00037433772,0.0011515043,0.011311024,0.0010644937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05949276,0.00025476437,0.00046395406,0.057746913,0.001219871,0.008139132,0.0032079604,0.00021356856,0.000047007215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071096756,0.00017175678,0.00028558096,0.21690826,0.0022180907,0.002171938,0.0017907717,0.00039712552,0.00010583119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002918799,0.00027554444,0.06719363,0.00009431649,0.000103215876,0.000009651867,0.0061461865,0.00005246148,0.04590373,0.0011748942,0.46633548,0.41241902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004821734,0.019974228,0.09135255,0.00194233,0.00010411186,0.00013494784,0.107447445,0.02450385,0.03911128,0.03577695,0.67217934,0.0026512376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057317415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107127904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40976778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043790744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009498594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99289054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099052861","doi":"10.1101/400515","title":"Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Homophily; Confounding; Demographics; Logistic regression; Demography; Psychology; Medicine; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.36380063591881673,"score_gpt":0.4836889474673257,"score_spread":0.11988831154850899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099052861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51766396,0.3947286,0.003643167,0.04749298,0.025049414,0.007994602,0.0015735317,0.0007055147,0.001148232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94234073,0.041767977,0.008458409,0.0032043315,0.001977487,0.00057356624,9.878969e-7,0.00023334267,0.001443144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97386515,0.0010699574,0.0025206043,0.0029693344,0.018086009,0.0014889169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525721,0.0017495053,0.0014237927,0.005871981,0.037147984,0.0012346576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08200852,0.000763354,0.0017780289,0.038514096,0.00024063495,0.0033849103,0.0070805517,0.0008425261,0.0016126863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19194539,0.0006093203,0.000561747,0.14199352,0.00038652887,0.0005720105,0.004526938,0.0019293297,0.0039372286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002158237,0.0005437504,0.067231335,0.0017465173,0.00009201357,0.00024309653,0.000009971846,0.000009749109,0.0063322643,0.0006594496,0.9228542,0.00025609357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034791508,0.00008112756,0.26347014,0.002782657,0.000050029234,2.3925178e-8,0.0000016022798,0.00038802275,0.0024953142,0.0000955949,0.72926366,0.0010239125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087727116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056834856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4246768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005955803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016979906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099302673","doi":"10.2196/21931","title":"Analysis of the Trends in Publications on Clinical Cancer Research in Mainland China from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Bibliometric Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Informatics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Epidemiology; Mainland China; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; Cancer; China; Database; Colorectal cancer; Cancer registry; Oncology; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.7422395863740804,"score_gpt":0.6666343565151769,"score_spread":0.0756052298589035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099302673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609684,0.00032390177,0.00007819448,0.035286155,0.00013726427,0.0004743443,0.0008045586,0.000007385548,0.0019198102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974091,0.0012875631,0.00008294821,0.0009559171,0.00007947228,0.00005580056,0.000058337086,0.0000045940847,0.000066256434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779504,0.004673559,0.0040694824,0.0006393275,0.011897115,0.00077012373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9097849,0.08591014,0.0008044836,0.0016973754,0.0010205486,0.00078254123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1423954,0.0001443116,0.00083215995,0.20717543,0.00018685071,0.00039777943,0.003951449,0.00022456846,0.0004656193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2292454,0.00006602594,0.00016562315,0.81055295,0.001003982,0.00036456037,0.0019970858,0.0017618849,0.00001866439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069353664,0.00029454642,0.8596784,0.0000029516066,0.00006605672,0.0000018365569,0.001234786,0.00006144527,2.1143147e-7,0.000109761764,0.024770837,0.11370984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011396655,0.00020768555,0.9319787,0.000014111496,0.000011695723,2.3918147e-7,0.001830973,0.056588136,4.12883e-7,0.00014252162,0.008016458,0.00006939883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020441764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004060439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60337746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000708514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000433289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8830844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099820958","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p295","title":"Academic Rank and Position Effect on Academic Research Output – A Case Study of Ariel University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Rank (graph theory); Citation; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Association (psychology); Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5460896587659517,"score_gpt":0.6214405482825802,"score_spread":0.0753508895166285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099820958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98983884,0.00040846693,0.000081725644,0.007927827,0.0010319882,0.00019505812,0.0000069950165,0.0000031192499,0.0005059957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985724,0.00011609712,0.000048876995,0.00016928684,0.00042727657,8.7579133e-7,0.0000010256107,0.0000049409755,0.00065919687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921417,0.00076107704,0.0005845349,0.0002765181,0.0060813837,0.000154791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906935,0.003402167,0.0004975606,0.00013663131,0.0049802996,0.00028984176],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009337185,0.00008062161,0.00019997689,0.017332338,0.00010648167,0.0002246995,0.001277336,0.000107246786,0.00010106722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058495575,0.00006047158,0.00006867054,0.016115528,0.00009438368,0.0006035995,0.00025434193,0.0009616719,0.00002351426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025756333,0.0016275505,0.58337206,0.000020317857,0.00025766448,0.0013458706,0.008294629,0.00021793346,0.008048934,0.0030839911,0.055295903,0.33585954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058629955,0.010757173,0.9113082,0.00016133863,0.00007710324,0.001687305,0.021911621,0.00084412366,0.0026056408,0.005457745,0.039009485,0.00031725597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013613144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021659514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3355423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020649162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035712184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99380535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102086983","doi":"10.1017/iop.2020.52","title":"I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Transparency (behavior); Ranking (information retrieval); Psychology; Top-down and bottom-up design; Social psychology; Information retrieval; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.7726359127152311,"score_gpt":0.5716448110506561,"score_spread":0.200991101664575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102086983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6704651,0.0060695456,0.0026299893,0.3177327,0.0014718933,0.00040511662,0.0000852108,0.000010359104,0.0011300811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906522,0.0011553229,0.00009461615,0.007226555,0.00054986886,0.0000029379337,0.0000029672615,0.000015172298,0.00030035718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99432003,0.00076729053,0.0010715064,0.0006640282,0.00279345,0.00038368627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945542,0.0028174247,0.00052433216,0.00042538447,0.0013775607,0.00030109062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007868825,0.0001851542,0.00044478397,0.0027681438,0.0006349558,0.0007133296,0.0016386722,0.00037601296,0.0069670533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014498979,0.00009503142,0.00009802676,0.027493643,0.00067129085,0.00028851352,0.0005263695,0.00085234654,0.00002724994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023157243,0.000079406906,0.851842,0.000003366778,0.000077237084,0.000008335095,0.0011018628,0.000024738167,0.0035296904,0.0010878543,0.093812,0.048201937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006277747,0.00025520162,0.8089533,0.000049485625,0.00006503873,0.00030020784,0.00040544063,0.00009824826,0.0011892542,0.07060883,0.11145777,0.00033948536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013476088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000104361825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3201871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021340104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019265394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3104534219","doi":"10.2501/jar-2020-028","title":"A 60-Year Bibliographic Review of the <i>Journal of Advertising Research</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advertising Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Library science; Scale (ratio); Web of science; Institution; Political science; World Wide Web; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Geography; MEDLINE; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7066735306888975,"score_gpt":0.6260799739364323,"score_spread":0.08059355675246516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3104534219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7373929,0.20970534,0.0021407811,0.04277611,0.0015124328,0.0009770652,0.000032546846,0.000010577846,0.0054522515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88780355,0.1096591,0.0012861347,0.00048740738,0.00051304867,0.0000010442982,2.726828e-7,0.000033591656,0.00021584728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9351049,0.0072737383,0.0043070726,0.000521013,0.05132521,0.0014680881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9044801,0.02175443,0.0029892917,0.001516325,0.06749494,0.001764917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20467483,0.00022519182,0.0011597831,0.10892947,0.0006803979,0.0010987842,0.009109919,0.00019262957,0.00048575888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24482179,0.00012546257,0.0010179369,0.43725577,0.0014000176,0.0015908023,0.0022374657,0.004161816,0.000067005356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011641327,0.00068513345,0.09503556,0.0018884623,0.00026277726,0.000479727,0.0013757836,0.00019698014,0.06096918,0.00025947354,0.7239581,0.11372474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009559115,0.016121598,0.30124128,0.055980247,0.00029413728,0.0026064645,0.0118118785,0.0024203283,0.07603163,0.033384647,0.48921338,0.0013353121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061491366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005561316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32832628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000257435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002611787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106155822","doi":"10.3389/frma.2020.595370","title":"Intellectual Structure of Coronavirus Research: A Perspective From an Author Cocitation Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Coronavirus; Identification (biology); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Transmission (telecommunications); Bibliometrics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Medicine; Virology; Disease; Biology; Library science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Computer science; Ecology; Pathology","score_opus":0.8795814717877448,"score_gpt":0.6823888219904412,"score_spread":0.19719264979730367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106155822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90371364,0.006336481,0.084076606,0.0033640692,0.0002491822,0.00054072874,0.0007193145,0.000016421169,0.0009835608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866938,0.0013491884,0.01150338,0.00006093083,0.000111011715,0.0000041473477,0.000035755682,0.000018654933,0.00022312297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766464,0.002986395,0.0011176058,0.0015184601,0.016639195,0.0010919196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96382105,0.018770793,0.00027479528,0.00097563566,0.014824614,0.0013331069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035941552,0.00021356458,0.00092683366,0.14512457,0.00041179624,0.0018260726,0.0027489616,0.00030681232,0.00033915494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25201342,0.00016951824,0.00021409181,0.49961665,0.0012497125,0.00062126265,0.0011753195,0.001862464,0.000016140442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066430727,0.00058742723,0.7659837,0.00003155335,0.0009401109,0.00009888388,0.020392997,0.0019899826,0.002327941,0.0071810293,0.040648352,0.15915374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008294172,0.0012707245,0.108997375,0.000011494142,0.00008749596,5.2915055e-7,0.08093219,0.7016794,0.0012795653,0.099200994,0.005393969,0.00031685317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023613914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033759518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6996894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050336117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005741062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992101},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3107275649","doi":"10.1108/pmm-03-2020-0015","title":"Bibliometric analysis of a controversial paper on predatory publishing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Originality; Impact factor; Analytics; Library science; Value (mathematics); Bibliometrics; History; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.6294773381878578,"score_gpt":0.47341826438102474,"score_spread":0.15605907380683304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107275649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98189193,0.003351779,0.0028955,0.0015048577,0.00034044814,0.00029688855,0.000067045796,0.000030588082,0.00962095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972558,0.0013915206,0.0002497778,0.0009023843,0.000097284435,0.000006649465,0.000004655934,0.000009624084,0.00008231151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97941154,0.00018327766,0.00095396984,0.0007713326,0.018129708,0.00055014074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904828,0.002204507,0.00050310977,0.0005538885,0.0055598468,0.0006958433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02761262,0.00020627944,0.0006955064,0.68086636,0.00020948934,0.0022831457,0.0015741407,0.0001405546,0.0004231246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10433004,0.00014707472,0.00027542462,0.9309337,0.0001212053,0.0022805417,0.0004474924,0.00037343107,0.000040470768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014483918,0.00013771871,0.6152971,0.000029509953,0.00035283345,0.0000019297563,0.00016542489,0.00037527937,0.0010403333,0.00025729023,0.008754454,0.37344334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011613481,0.0007390756,0.88159764,0.000008512865,0.00024154416,3.5089928e-7,0.00018768794,0.06220259,0.0016495746,0.000043234362,0.051935516,0.0002329218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033225348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004566903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013928335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001821282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109162764","doi":"10.2312/yes19.15","title":"What Peer-review Experiences Can Offer To Early Career Scientists And To The Scientific Community","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université Laval; McGill University; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.5687515180207338,"score_gpt":0.5528710799880578,"score_spread":0.015880438032675914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109162764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47643554,0.0017887175,0.0017197881,0.51125443,0.0013411471,0.0039455234,0.0031790594,0.000059658796,0.00027612154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634505,0.0005620263,0.001748366,0.013509815,0.00031568506,0.0011321647,0.00084205763,0.000035653215,0.018403722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.965667,0.0017018848,0.0010795237,0.0022770555,0.027108207,0.0021663196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95160705,0.0067140465,0.00033387553,0.0038854852,0.033025373,0.004434152],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11975461,0.0003025047,0.00044832038,0.015252494,0.005754438,0.033110008,0.0121109355,0.00008105506,0.0008887443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19434568,0.00019297906,0.00015197691,0.17659958,0.0019693663,0.0044831154,0.006325068,0.0008353921,0.00077692565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023368877,0.00013268263,0.0038900715,0.00007349799,0.0000061328406,0.0000019563934,0.013335237,0.0000028574375,0.00031704817,0.0010002044,0.9090984,0.07211853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023688251,0.00021579186,0.021496812,0.00010615281,0.000006110046,0.000004016486,0.015583398,0.0021313208,0.0005986843,0.00034140062,0.9589874,0.00029199073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014174556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018444543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49774462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020886926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011373612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110330489","doi":"10.1111/joes.12420","title":"GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Citation impact; Web of science; Cover (algebra); Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Political science; Economics; MEDLINE; Management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8358293631396622,"score_gpt":0.6066546507714353,"score_spread":0.22917471236822684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110330489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953422,0.00090375036,0.0001917859,0.0006687744,0.00047446656,0.00025596542,0.00004292417,0.0000012743891,0.0021188648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832572,0.016191382,0.0003851661,0.000018364368,0.000076260876,0.0000017832962,0.0000023467321,0.000008260431,0.000059250448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936968,0.0021266395,0.0014169425,0.0007350981,0.0015624798,0.00046203696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935436,0.00449888,0.0006607745,0.00033178463,0.0005712642,0.00039367963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13026196,0.0001587522,0.00063572975,0.059081573,0.00010211471,0.0016291924,0.0014217533,0.00019024583,0.000094624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050975853,0.00013109318,0.00012887489,0.010264988,0.00014657012,0.0005573259,0.0056855697,0.0010747612,0.00002267439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060096252,0.000046327637,0.92546564,0.000019735795,0.000052377836,0.000055116743,0.0004896845,0.0040139277,0.0000022814318,0.00021861836,0.001383694,0.06819251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007355822,0.00009794666,0.9291064,0.000018406716,0.0000034219368,0.000008409291,0.00077432964,0.010574786,0.0000030953788,0.058330648,0.0002313302,0.000115622235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012381426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007978061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12516437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011817645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046832618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110679542","doi":"10.1136/bmj.m4265","title":"Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Medicine; Database","score_opus":0.9087737826657781,"score_gpt":0.6600632667911674,"score_spread":0.24871051587461068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110679542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33835825,0.006875121,0.23786005,0.35346556,0.0041697496,0.0011515074,0.0007918093,0.00022976693,0.057098188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893446,0.00023373599,0.004351183,0.003851042,0.0010903527,0.00001171619,0.000015133061,0.000013429791,0.0010888348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98594534,0.00033056445,0.0008965547,0.00069405773,0.011441096,0.0006923698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935091,0.003030288,0.00029663794,0.00069831597,0.0013293141,0.0011363598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01827553,0.00012752002,0.00028702425,0.015903415,0.00028444632,0.0032581133,0.002565916,0.00007760424,0.009474417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115516655,0.00008304883,0.00015603134,0.12414319,0.00021005303,0.0018389854,0.0015101985,0.00036007082,0.0023003872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001251342,0.00009064035,0.07087826,0.000005546896,0.00001929128,0.000064756015,0.00016722298,0.0000011669187,0.0010688992,0.00089330634,0.88060987,0.04618852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003242032,0.000093271134,0.01708043,0.000009185793,0.000002704178,0.000019585625,0.0005341257,0.0018183107,0.0003157185,0.0008693546,0.9788014,0.00013170783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001598122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022008198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6509863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054061453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003091887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113126806","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00097","title":"Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Division of labour; Taxonomy (biology); General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.8339422120845222,"score_gpt":0.6137471753924978,"score_spread":0.22019503669202445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113126806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97376204,0.0061632576,0.0063066343,0.011527852,0.0011869934,0.0006108819,0.00008499559,0.000018285868,0.00033904111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948659,0.00006961973,0.0045383815,0.00035124534,0.000066156616,0.000019324862,4.360231e-7,0.0000054895704,0.00008343182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98714125,0.0005313293,0.0008354462,0.0009440579,0.009858585,0.00068930193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582623,0.018525884,0.001294489,0.0012530382,0.020159591,0.0005046683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04250939,0.00017911034,0.00042263107,0.006390642,0.003850134,0.0027539718,0.004642354,0.000029997958,0.000029144026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26173234,0.000075970696,0.00013316053,0.19028297,0.014170192,0.0012570176,0.0024394933,0.00027922375,0.000054812364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005075743,0.0001858467,0.4071733,0.00006052765,0.00021433196,0.0000084281255,0.05820768,0.0029855892,0.29235387,0.14986369,0.039127056,0.049768902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010096617,0.0011568097,0.21289988,0.00016367322,0.000060780585,0.0000036023382,0.3246449,0.32121807,0.06246091,0.03252978,0.043132916,0.0007190153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039166633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003263172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3182325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088111854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077674293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114226199","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol25no3.3","title":"Similarity indexes for scientometric research: A comparative analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Jaccard index; Similarity (geometry); Scientometrics; Computer science; Index (typography); Citation analysis; Information retrieval; Statistics; Citation; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Library science; Pattern recognition (psychology); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7831704493547128,"score_gpt":0.6110607620420506,"score_spread":0.17210968731266219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114226199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85926634,0.0002948005,0.09964037,0.017372658,0.0005471149,0.0006597885,0.0001672484,0.00003340958,0.022018293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886415,0.000042995773,0.010179477,0.00089071307,0.00013098028,0.000004967143,0.0000047879244,0.0000035230921,0.00010103169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769451,0.00035881248,0.0020209972,0.00043593126,0.019383697,0.00085544126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780642,0.0051682983,0.0015267624,0.0005782815,0.012983738,0.0016787429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054784868,0.00016082122,0.00062672154,0.20565763,0.0009204723,0.011165133,0.0072164154,0.000079996586,0.0005996611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055673275,0.000109192624,0.00045433192,0.659561,0.0013361287,0.03547196,0.0011274924,0.00061968097,0.00017913654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077136845,0.0003427733,0.70587856,0.000057880367,0.00031696146,0.00002425124,0.020387828,0.021076253,0.0014031961,0.030779732,0.12654063,0.09242055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017117399,0.002212238,0.4436045,0.00002151821,0.00008205752,0.00003135551,0.0114327585,0.28980586,0.009432349,0.009939705,0.23122138,0.00050455215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026133812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.7728476e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45390332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010642412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020402507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115533035","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2020.101124","title":"Exploring the interdisciplinarity patterns of highly cited papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Informetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Bibliometrics; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7915538673463653,"score_gpt":0.540354756721656,"score_spread":0.25119911062470934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115533035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832191,0.00021952298,0.007797399,0.0042846175,0.0007978045,0.00009901529,0.00002178753,0.000005640619,0.0035551523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818474,0.0006638176,0.00051278423,0.00035665493,0.00018904897,0.0000010789245,4.5068538e-7,0.000006738394,0.000084659405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885271,0.00011164795,0.0017717608,0.0001793483,0.009060611,0.0003494958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864179,0.0062540085,0.0015167717,0.00041082143,0.0048870007,0.00051350374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014953543,0.00012721922,0.0004413208,0.04018199,0.00014953327,0.00083033653,0.0033085796,0.00005683511,0.00016279289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0823548,0.00006357809,0.0003950083,0.19905947,0.00009759679,0.001463883,0.0009447991,0.0006211129,0.00003357273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018131682,0.00013200495,0.36896878,0.000035729536,0.00009770814,0.0000447281,0.0032025396,0.0005698271,0.0009917931,0.0008397754,0.007894688,0.6170411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012123319,0.0017710455,0.89816916,0.000045394376,0.000032070868,0.000051922692,0.009519179,0.0028481889,0.006095413,0.00079033535,0.07922098,0.00024399467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014560274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022514587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6167971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008873425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021101936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97069675},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3116373126","doi":"10.1177/0253717620979475","title":"Do the Criteria of Our Best-Paper Awards Need Revision?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.5091905893527676,"score_gpt":0.6346134764227196,"score_spread":0.12542288706995197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116373126","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008237667,0.011053992,0.00034972493,0.061448313,0.9146751,0.0003793304,0.00015017384,0.000008725425,0.0036969602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20597695,0.0053752856,0.000677637,0.001270839,0.7858346,0.0000030205995,0.0000096018375,0.000035343637,0.0008167228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96967757,0.0014097566,0.0035440167,0.00080865825,0.023916867,0.00064312445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658093,0.016616864,0.0036164536,0.0013588914,0.011298718,0.0012998063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04913998,0.00040902972,0.0019514323,0.023773082,0.00017481508,0.00069896836,0.008532896,0.0010064852,0.0032250502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.355303,0.00016541938,0.0006464246,0.070984006,0.00068398943,0.00032348934,0.00056791614,0.003696502,0.00021888886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002325444,0.0001646961,0.00029068202,0.000020045227,0.000054347387,0.00067001703,0.00035010758,8.904353e-7,0.00015582808,0.000018657283,0.9306139,0.06742832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016128309,0.0059403465,0.0019596226,0.0004788741,0.00006765369,0.0001466509,0.0023359912,0.0000036054412,0.000011017881,0.004649987,0.98260105,0.00019239017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015264211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.0764835e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.306163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009093435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003858297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117899626","doi":"10.1097/brs.0000000000003890","title":"Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Spine Publications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Scopus; Citation; Proxy (statistics); Bibliometrics; Library science; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.4871995928205806,"score_gpt":0.5255129393924708,"score_spread":0.03831334657189017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117899626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88536966,0.00039300654,0.0028436088,0.097749114,0.00029406877,0.00017079622,0.00017091302,0.000029340306,0.012979486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949302,0.00008433362,0.0004681481,0.0005323709,0.00008371128,0.0000028974018,0.000007644445,0.000004389959,0.0038863176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667406,0.0000510214,0.0004024787,0.0002887539,0.0024000464,0.00018361761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977274,0.00017625246,0.00019217015,0.00044987712,0.0012202088,0.00023407656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021003208,0.00006581556,0.00017506462,0.010011956,0.00012309842,0.00048542029,0.0011313604,0.000040022915,0.0005989348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024452375,0.00003627232,0.00005247212,0.19779179,0.00015459882,0.00016497025,0.0005767597,0.00012414179,0.000026177706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044104,0.00012761074,0.31675163,0.000012274706,0.000017585959,0.0000014876631,0.00016584549,0.0000034683028,0.015162653,0.013167716,0.06437499,0.5902043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016190422,0.000089190544,0.9101543,0.0000020315547,0.0000031405611,0.0000011433145,0.000024906281,0.0042474903,0.0006229312,0.00031349176,0.08433339,0.000046077417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009137544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027320089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5934027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010261387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052125095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98376507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W311792049","doi":"10.4000/cres.2183","title":"De la république de la science à l’économie du savoir : 50 ans de politiques publiques de la recherche universitaire au Québec","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de la recherche sur l éducation et les savoirs","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.649060763002282,"score_gpt":0.5525760133520676,"score_spread":0.09648474965021436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W311792049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7603715,0.006537654,0.028558657,0.061117843,0.0004619899,0.00039492268,0.00007591725,0.00019068955,0.1422908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89947313,0.01177254,0.06400345,0.002299613,0.0004549233,0.00006959692,0.000015312586,0.000096502816,0.021814937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90371114,0.08639475,0.0011971011,0.0016637696,0.002991758,0.0040414566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56428623,0.41948178,0.0011430612,0.0024396863,0.0069709346,0.005678334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37339967,0.0006365611,0.00066661066,0.019950405,0.0014019565,0.0067269155,0.0045140367,0.005099233,0.00043510192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5373273,0.00064120756,0.00045601296,0.05411355,0.0111058485,0.004790434,0.0007421829,0.007640914,0.00007888561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010255207,0.0014652875,0.4179104,0.00015201999,0.00012982183,0.000052294417,0.14402394,0.00029514756,0.0058375425,0.26503885,0.02860805,0.13638407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010083851,0.00024226616,0.2746484,0.00022551022,0.000121361256,0.00072195305,0.08550796,0.004159096,0.010369572,0.13961092,0.4821289,0.0012557026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09635747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030976709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45352083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08621677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12059149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119992070","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.02","title":"Chinese PhD Students’ Perceptions of Predatory Journals: A Survey Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Perception; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.6534216837444228,"score_gpt":0.595377689547528,"score_spread":0.058043994196894766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119992070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916221,0.0034360709,0.0014409496,0.001072899,0.0013529226,0.00014783372,0.000064314874,0.000006202749,0.00085672596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969657,0.00032628066,0.0010764886,0.00013250498,0.0003462059,0.0000014422282,0.000002162602,0.000016582073,0.0011326225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547205,0.0038648313,0.0033972582,0.00061068777,0.036796622,0.000610116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073197,0.008828923,0.0027544266,0.0011806246,0.07880252,0.001113802],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2120601,0.00019674032,0.0008274937,0.04992243,0.0004026839,0.15080282,0.007732893,0.00021335966,0.0016346242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5093609,0.00012972153,0.0004517955,0.15354869,0.00009899506,0.08244356,0.0020598506,0.0029429207,0.000031415893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041387397,0.0015244136,0.97025084,0.0000038802955,0.00013189547,0.0001435841,0.001012175,0.000045306315,0.0017078338,0.000011978073,0.012934466,0.012192258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001301521,0.00036932918,0.985883,0.000036753943,0.000019672481,0.00016131393,0.009832975,0.000049081173,0.000042494816,0.0010139158,0.001165493,0.00012443341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016114066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018914994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29730082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024066065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935734},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3120412237","doi":"10.18438/eblip29736","title":"Research Productivity and Its Relationship to Library Collections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Data collection; Collection development; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Regression analysis; Library science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5682970782440521,"score_gpt":0.5375281748841486,"score_spread":0.030768903359903454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120412237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0628571,0.001771307,0.003950402,0.89259756,0.00019015308,0.0010896048,0.00005493855,0.00014856827,0.037340373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569311,0.0009236564,0.0052197566,0.032768313,0.00016456733,0.000056281704,0.000010971588,0.000010248409,0.0039150636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936942,0.0012276975,0.0005991702,0.0004695411,0.003671154,0.00033827935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599675,0.037340473,0.0002527247,0.0004226097,0.0010464409,0.000970256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116257295,0.0001103495,0.00015647055,0.01678814,0.0010308614,0.00884992,0.0007630537,0.000093369636,0.00068937725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2509769,0.00008838968,0.00003099094,0.14767438,0.000099644974,0.30963597,0.00093849277,0.0006104609,0.0005630876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013993079,0.00014569671,0.05140008,0.00014068735,0.000017339784,0.000012346549,0.0014421248,0.00063277694,0.0002504388,0.35080642,0.529073,0.06467981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018097722,0.00039721144,0.07012949,0.000034319077,0.0000042644647,0.000009666443,0.0009931959,0.012767928,0.0017110339,0.0010432564,0.9125948,0.00013386236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031813574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.2380154e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012055867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059146807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99435574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120462291","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.01","title":"Book Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Australia, Part One: Understanding Institutional Pressures and the Funding Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Media studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.8039142264450041,"score_gpt":0.5148172773623888,"score_spread":0.2890969490826153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120462291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80588794,0.035409465,0.0005710945,0.14756298,0.0008694164,0.00023271401,0.000016826461,0.0000055629666,0.0094439965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382657,0.00045576866,0.0001459397,0.0046287654,0.000298277,0.000002843463,8.546396e-7,0.0000041334474,0.0006368645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875082,0.0014653279,0.001138876,0.00039522204,0.008959367,0.0005330376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376274,0.012264878,0.0008088427,0.00021563677,0.0028566737,0.000091253714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12076388,0.00012605124,0.0003736136,0.016028915,0.002123834,0.35070485,0.0025719486,0.00015830698,0.00012493368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10634892,0.000069262576,0.000100026824,0.036808666,0.001426346,0.109387,0.00081045646,0.0023429228,9.881434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116856034,0.00014109495,0.29419395,0.00002670738,0.000056326317,0.00020140839,0.01607224,0.00009540704,0.00009963885,0.57416534,0.104439475,0.010391538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051115993,0.00013578682,0.32404953,0.00029966971,0.00003042211,0.0004912617,0.12256405,0.0006424734,0.000043426266,0.15845056,0.3878639,0.00031730608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033946574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005374914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4157148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026003394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071035983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121153159","doi":"10.1177/2325967120969902","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Cited Articles in Sports and Exercise Medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Sport Centre Pacific; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sports medicine; Medicine; Web of science; Scopus; Alternative medicine; Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Citation; Narrative review; Sports science; Family medicine; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Physical therapy; Library science; Internal medicine; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.1919176015695751,"score_gpt":0.46394098333202166,"score_spread":0.27202338176244656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121153159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630334,0.029499887,0.00027927273,0.005589844,0.00072444684,0.00012128947,0.0000047751396,0.0000034377106,0.0007436717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860546,0.01292175,0.00016921511,0.00022278987,0.0001457185,8.529257e-7,0.0000020757661,0.000009167778,0.0004738251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98064065,0.00020548735,0.0027430458,0.00046292058,0.0154930195,0.00045485675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809385,0.0027342392,0.001838665,0.00085259095,0.0058618034,0.00061887444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036704514,0.00019725414,0.0014673942,0.6319511,0.00009201457,0.00009692895,0.0010732047,0.00011822597,0.00263296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046115216,0.000096232405,0.00033259668,0.90381885,0.00074604235,0.00033543466,0.00036136777,0.0005038519,8.276193e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039793445,0.00008468944,0.69179386,0.00000806559,0.000059471273,0.00044569222,0.00033822472,0.000055130502,0.00016756645,0.00004836072,0.0013859724,0.3055732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014144108,0.00011880908,0.9911288,0.00046680245,0.00046987095,0.00010916325,0.0018178029,0.0005100251,0.00012777494,0.0020932518,0.0016511041,0.00009217933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008197735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024687857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30548102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057253324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037912434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982788},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3121658915","doi":"","title":"Citations or Journal Quality: Which is Rewarded More in the Academic Labor Market?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Quality (philosophy); Index (typography); Prestige; Measure (data warehouse); Actuarial science; Psychology; Impact factor; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.6430703481252008,"score_gpt":0.6208366936060491,"score_spread":0.022233654519151713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712948,0.0013292389,0.000015226093,0.031773858,0.0013036944,0.0015262098,0.0004305319,0.000020598827,0.09230584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032472,0.062590286,0.0014294109,0.0016477512,0.0009338256,0.0004002464,0.00004029148,0.00009791407,0.0296131],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97481614,0.00544438,0.0032490054,0.0020293747,0.01237241,0.002088696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95543104,0.031244371,0.0010073744,0.0032044505,0.00811874,0.0009940125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22065865,0.00041303568,0.0010144924,0.06719394,0.00051601185,0.005457294,0.0110307485,0.00105667,0.0012257033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23652185,0.00026094803,0.00030355793,0.08371126,0.0006546145,0.00062784954,0.004608496,0.009579919,0.00011556457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008044475,0.0007125139,0.2089631,0.00010660146,0.00014165783,0.0002746651,0.011441376,0.003600078,0.00003892349,0.0006081061,0.13883021,0.63447833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028430803,0.00038368232,0.48291507,0.00030742277,0.000014124439,0.00013549479,0.05052731,0.035036992,0.000029547466,0.101536386,0.32509136,0.0011795132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023086878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010439671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020426952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072906488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121870221","doi":"","title":"Co-Authorship and the Output of Academic Economists","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Panel data; Positive economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.3680460502368933,"score_gpt":0.5323470082551035,"score_spread":0.1643009580182102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121870221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96868277,0.016470863,0.0038722062,0.004492742,0.00017733083,0.00012474773,0.0000029200473,0.0000052088662,0.0061712004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95101225,0.041893285,0.000022218292,0.00007621653,0.00014201501,0.0000017403258,2.9695363e-7,0.000006465926,0.006845532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368143,0.00046362754,0.00072643836,0.00030131981,0.0029889345,0.0018382673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949115,0.0033465596,0.0004250029,0.00032615397,0.00075243035,0.00023835126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08991635,0.0001056182,0.0002886597,0.013116779,0.00029368064,0.0006535469,0.0019314579,0.000117834155,0.00009037308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016059147,0.00005445621,0.00015147726,0.030890299,0.00040558891,0.00037647138,0.00014072923,0.0023849765,0.00007691004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037975138,0.00004469807,0.19939175,0.0000022744123,0.0000846049,0.0000067993574,0.00053465477,0.00003153929,0.00014721419,0.25616074,0.0019813846,0.5412346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015058514,0.00015807929,0.026479833,0.0000059563863,0.000008122716,0.0006770274,0.0009459948,0.0008204137,0.00009867344,0.95922923,0.009977763,0.00009308473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004054589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054943604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7030685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025300885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012217506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122247609","doi":"10.24124/2016/59114","title":"Faculty knowledge and perceptions of open access publishing at UNBC","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Library science; Publishing; Open access publishing; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Management; Medicine; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.889146350400722,"score_gpt":0.7176417645412633,"score_spread":0.1715045858594587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122247609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026686335,0.001819964,0.0009691274,0.0014837724,0.0013159242,0.0006569812,0.0013464013,0.000023161896,0.96569836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21238747,0.0072378586,0.0006096692,0.000048537422,0.0003316356,0.000042254454,0.00013638231,0.000036034,0.77917016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801377,0.0002803216,0.0014897586,0.0015476668,0.015873138,0.0006714001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96739537,0.0065850965,0.0010603574,0.0016807377,0.022447878,0.0008305899],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050554555,0.00028990133,0.00096309895,0.08743842,0.00042631582,0.044367976,0.017239135,0.00052393874,0.017125916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121639535,0.00015146483,0.00025014186,0.14670086,0.00038585972,0.008575747,0.039819356,0.0004488199,0.0004976345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000444746,0.00005428787,0.12097629,0.000018314557,0.000020490354,0.0000023318441,0.000037378784,8.180241e-8,0.000043494212,0.00019808351,0.666633,0.21201181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027079313,0.000038018654,0.26185727,0.000053617,0.000010691602,0.00001816125,0.00012434753,0.00003194618,0.000073741656,0.0025366636,0.73476624,0.00021851523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024837565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011498021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2117933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006449432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030085354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98807806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122374824","doi":"","title":"The (Changing) Knowledge Production Function: Evidence from the MIT Department of Biology for 1970-2000","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Knowledge production; Period (music); Face (sociological concept); Function (biology); Duration (music); Medical education; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Medicine; Economic growth; Computer science; Economics; Knowledge management; Evolutionary biology; Law","score_opus":0.42434092499431086,"score_gpt":0.5259486572310224,"score_spread":0.10160773223671149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122374824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95101255,0.017992344,0.0011520385,0.008003038,0.008354338,0.0049028047,0.00042146185,0.00003355572,0.00812784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97353566,0.018473174,0.00047205435,0.000044436143,0.0011751503,0.0008283067,0.0000444831,0.000031224754,0.005395527],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918246,0.0016428854,0.0014145799,0.0017630728,0.0021433397,0.0012114835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425732,0.050160322,0.00082831475,0.0029743807,0.0032297126,0.00023406294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.071168765,0.00026757093,0.0005920753,0.012186539,0.0008603853,0.0012918435,0.0048850123,0.00039102652,0.00009726247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09981985,0.0001494237,0.00037349368,0.017141681,0.0010411735,0.00017190591,0.0038742684,0.0011840736,0.00005314254],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003177989,0.00013103674,0.030654058,0.000031761563,0.0001247104,5.359551e-7,0.0005820152,0.0016884032,0.00017611342,0.0005233226,0.005500554,0.9602697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066742155,0.00077417784,0.05748069,0.00027578283,0.000029423734,0.0000032857477,0.001977399,0.036244232,0.0012729182,0.05991184,0.8408398,0.0005230533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016171404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079981127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95974666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088183605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015444828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122602469","doi":"","title":"The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Political science; Business; Psychology; Advertising; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.34126194133277804,"score_gpt":0.43358358098999056,"score_spread":0.09232163965721252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122602469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2946351,0.0000116099545,0.0010979774,0.00223574,0.00044040434,0.0005733646,0.00010929931,0.000051212603,0.7008453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93114334,0.06116593,0.00072323217,0.00003923323,0.00007765026,0.0000058059836,0.0000065898193,0.000018508614,0.006819695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496156,0.00024956107,0.00038490436,0.0006483741,0.0032326656,0.0005229379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849374,0.0018357581,0.0006775587,0.0028782145,0.0058163772,0.00029836223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069137076,0.00015306719,0.00025200626,0.15929222,0.002265284,0.002448479,0.007506033,0.0001316818,0.0001665749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046777975,0.00010359204,0.00017650577,0.23059176,0.0006293462,0.0012555012,0.003336128,0.0002446532,0.00016606742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045327033,0.0007899379,0.43559343,0.00005346441,0.0002291999,0.00008229261,0.0014063923,0.0000318507,0.00023061295,0.01983338,0.04728376,0.49401242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042082134,0.00004180764,0.12804148,0.000007549302,0.000010876197,0.0000031377447,0.00022921251,0.00028786677,0.0002564445,0.00001814895,0.8705675,0.00011513911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020789606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015254027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8232838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003335178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015592965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122668107","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewac007","title":"Markets for Scientific Attribution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Attribution; Interim; Quality (philosophy); Scientific publishing; Pareto principle; Positive economics; Publishing; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Operations management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3645518697973288,"score_gpt":0.4604129379619882,"score_spread":0.09586106816465939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122668107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98238605,0.00032243202,0.013469918,0.0026478944,0.00085025554,0.0001104871,0.00003674666,0.0000016530025,0.00017454391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989533,0.00022111951,0.00019448687,0.00012819353,0.00006667206,6.1112064e-7,0.000004569745,0.0000054101756,0.00042565347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842525,0.00013900083,0.0004295418,0.00011619855,0.0007631848,0.0001268303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640995,0.0011422932,0.0004457862,0.00016791446,0.0017557422,0.00007831654],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026045982,0.000041088286,0.000111811736,0.0036309988,0.0011416636,0.0010984808,0.00073651597,0.000016860535,0.00023169193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024634008,0.00002619525,0.00003501952,0.013378158,0.00009260882,0.00033189726,0.00030413267,0.00009146183,0.000004432614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050329696,0.00038557826,0.07389396,0.000012812388,0.00010948386,0.0000032453015,0.002464097,0.011814457,0.0069877347,0.72616404,0.053502373,0.124158904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009728677,0.00035780043,0.045282125,0.0000017150453,0.000025666586,0.00016228494,0.0007683085,0.01531683,0.0031928988,0.07263924,0.86115,0.00013020277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042974875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000040531404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8076477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010030006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012303078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123074005","doi":"10.1177/1056492612442621","title":"The Skewed Few","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Elite; Skepticism; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Accounting; Public relations; Social psychology; Business; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.7354869257884775,"score_gpt":0.6139664475756849,"score_spread":0.12152047821279266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123074005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7618334,0.021726826,0.041540984,0.014203383,0.024204273,0.0005365992,0.0000029149776,0.00002320602,0.13592836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98742205,0.001911556,0.0011853825,0.00029139154,0.00085501274,0.0000017069275,1.0843039e-7,0.000006447089,0.008326317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006486,0.0002474175,0.00082563964,0.00012792571,0.008213152,0.00052102865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944842,0.002756828,0.000598073,0.0005040501,0.0013095081,0.00034737846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053067252,0.00008193004,0.0001766243,0.017692149,0.0003098953,0.0015684394,0.002657942,0.000036508573,0.0002610776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007328227,0.00003828687,0.00019543954,0.047738038,0.00014953491,0.0008865945,0.0006820648,0.00023029873,0.00046044268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032682798,0.00013720593,0.031126589,0.0000033707042,0.00006565886,0.000021115418,0.00022827757,0.000015954212,0.000022901282,0.010319696,0.42439458,0.533632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888318,0.000079715544,0.18484181,0.000006036178,0.0000121259345,0.000020886695,0.0020608793,0.000056718007,0.000063403604,0.0062154457,0.8062922,0.000061967556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010962056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5357377e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007805583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029425712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123272100","doi":"","title":"An Updated Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ranking (information retrieval); Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.4285129579472714,"score_gpt":0.5676841937327737,"score_spread":0.13917123578550228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123272100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747355,0.00046081402,0.000020178524,0.0005421974,0.0011169396,0.0008456577,0.00017413746,0.000016837615,0.022087729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96730316,0.03050216,0.0010340855,0.00006400341,0.00028259083,0.00005834728,0.000049587812,0.0000662982,0.000639754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855059,0.0015736658,0.0039991313,0.0025464671,0.0043184743,0.002056391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858795,0.006238039,0.0013661985,0.0032236231,0.0023453012,0.0009473614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10699712,0.00046684785,0.0015752687,0.1187053,0.00021677426,0.002384903,0.010267376,0.0019359854,0.0010370709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025364265,0.00043273886,0.00039323725,0.033293806,0.00085964287,0.0009997048,0.0050855298,0.010192816,0.00004643148],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015818093,0.00029913976,0.2152717,0.000022543654,0.000039110404,0.00003474423,0.00035300976,0.02101258,0.002106332,0.0003659782,0.00015609729,0.7601806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003702725,0.00049343647,0.44892398,0.00036569865,0.000013742001,0.000048964823,0.0028845868,0.37268028,0.0049688513,0.11669226,0.047372993,0.0018524952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032034717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010139474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7583281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012676832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027508796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123390588","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.521130","title":"How Does the Government (Want to) Fund Science? Politics, Lobbying and Academic Earmarks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Government; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Quality (philosophy); Public funding; Public administration; Political science; Public policy; Public economics; Business; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.3248510872199778,"score_gpt":0.518223573959732,"score_spread":0.19337248673975416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123390588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016503,0.016899958,0.024954524,0.051627535,0.0026632142,0.00076675526,0.000074186086,0.000023147388,0.0013403906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705472,0.02413596,0.00019653357,0.00032744068,0.0007904883,0.000012767439,8.149489e-7,0.000025483161,0.0039633345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96984535,0.00032583135,0.0009454934,0.0014172485,0.021500915,0.005965133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993076,0.0015900999,0.0007766613,0.0011483076,0.002292104,0.0011167929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0864562,0.00041830423,0.0005389284,0.020543912,0.0018182356,0.014415249,0.008031331,0.0003333687,0.000039004215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025658138,0.00020413604,0.00027944136,0.051368445,0.0009816979,0.00078871875,0.006357899,0.010554392,0.00003727853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010376888,0.00020037752,0.04175221,0.000047331552,0.00033370595,0.00006289421,0.0024110542,0.0010495496,0.002716643,0.32172254,0.0015770049,0.6280229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446348,0.0002731654,0.013813228,0.00010400888,0.000031059095,0.00043813107,0.008628044,0.0007324923,0.0007231415,0.9683142,0.0060515343,0.00044467705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014236156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017677642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64659166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077641103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01442214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123391130","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j6rmb","title":"Artificial Intelligence in Quebec: A Tightly Knit Network","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Politics; Investment (military); Political science; Control (management); Key (lock); Public investment; Business; Public administration; Public fund; Economics; Management; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.6661553883722251,"score_gpt":0.5758631146168364,"score_spread":0.09029227375538873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123391130","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30098143,0.009055786,0.39342508,0.006843403,0.008517508,0.0018812362,0.000059305687,0.00018619231,0.27905005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89367074,0.0005278981,0.014067977,0.0003344709,0.00087033986,0.00007430667,0.000038020356,0.00003365526,0.09038258],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335314,0.0006401618,0.0019132203,0.001960326,0.011037024,0.0010961352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98835987,0.0057523903,0.00038378531,0.0018991566,0.003130767,0.0004740137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028657436,0.00032632897,0.00078698376,0.06213313,0.00014274202,0.012456252,0.005219045,0.0005790568,0.029384717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030357946,0.00023908725,0.00037041376,0.25329855,0.00019267155,0.0004180753,0.0076841684,0.0015527587,0.0037079102],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016662834,0.00020729708,0.007127394,0.000011145208,0.000015797032,0.00016361766,0.00016558883,0.008090245,0.000019564653,0.005327754,0.016546493,0.96230847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000145936,0.00016827161,0.067997515,0.00031264735,0.000020163738,0.000014098456,0.003028299,0.28017017,0.0017969714,0.5257029,0.1185484,0.0020946667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020580795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040728483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003181995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001506367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124075562","doi":"","title":"Incentives and the Effects of Publication Lags on Life Cycle Research Productivity in Economics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Construct (python library); Demographic economics; Economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Economic growth; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.3289268130147977,"score_gpt":0.5053842934740813,"score_spread":0.1764574804592836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124075562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378631,0.0007024661,0.0000026761386,0.002269836,0.0005147648,0.0024575456,0.000038626822,0.000010601252,0.056140363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96928096,0.028586427,0.00011654661,0.000045004,0.00014345445,0.0004253978,0.000009634885,0.00003662665,0.0013559418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522687,0.005005731,0.0017923602,0.002611822,0.0038112006,0.0015520146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94958436,0.04208907,0.00074534555,0.0036253221,0.0033569506,0.00059892714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12619707,0.0003275088,0.0010572318,0.054028597,0.0003466227,0.0018987207,0.0047618947,0.0005532835,0.00006774096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20772965,0.0002373016,0.00021345388,0.025503166,0.003036794,0.000569461,0.007386547,0.003723741,0.000036711743],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010929172,0.001096147,0.08556206,0.00025052828,0.00008237609,0.0000100414145,0.0019773939,0.0009400257,0.00009128687,0.015836343,0.0004188146,0.8926421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005231621,0.0008220055,0.70568687,0.00038933946,0.000008718544,0.0000048917123,0.0022879846,0.034180336,0.0024449388,0.23577516,0.012326408,0.0008417199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084810215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005870152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89180034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009930123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017383377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124238178","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2541382","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Frontier; Test (biology); Shock (circulatory); Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Computer security; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.24517672521271838,"score_gpt":0.5367705534625077,"score_spread":0.2915938282497893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124238178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96198636,0.0016863398,0.0078759175,0.022892399,0.00086415495,0.00057067,0.000006488374,0.000021019416,0.0040966487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814906,0.0010081549,0.00012599147,0.00021947813,0.00041427268,0.000021129874,0.0000014701316,0.00001039453,0.01670852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250174,0.0005158128,0.000594874,0.00037932195,0.0040161447,0.0019921144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995876,0.0025320784,0.00026360966,0.0006236834,0.006168409,0.0004534411],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034152497,0.00013232739,0.00017679512,0.0153485,0.0007449611,0.0051648244,0.0022486271,0.0000782813,0.00059157837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026528174,0.000052126354,0.0001120894,0.10869539,0.00006486439,0.0012038208,0.0003285242,0.0011538847,0.0021237186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009463096,0.0003551642,0.09512268,0.0000033641265,0.0001293237,0.0000048679312,0.0025819684,0.00037398015,0.0028457397,0.11832489,0.10017342,0.67999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444436,0.00039384942,0.07878191,0.000009492147,0.000010273854,0.00006552931,0.011247568,0.0046799076,0.0002642003,0.8558687,0.047887478,0.00024662452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002271666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025874951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7375438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008384243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002772313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124375610","doi":"","title":"Serendipity Arrangements for Exapting Science-Based Innovations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Exaptation; Serendipity; Performativity; Extant taxon; Temporality; Epistemology; Narrative; Orchestration; Sociology; Cognitive science; Biology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5909572288283065,"score_gpt":0.6020597934960763,"score_spread":0.011102564667769821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124375610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7641541,0.00047459942,0.22239585,0.0044150953,0.001200489,0.0003593792,0.000019851717,0.000019499776,0.0069611873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585027,0.00021531816,0.0014841612,0.0000786553,0.00025797563,0.000011206961,0.0000015215355,0.000010091325,0.0020907752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98898196,0.000066100576,0.0005975577,0.0005465312,0.0065076994,0.003300158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909133,0.0008805488,0.00080216106,0.000992427,0.006133931,0.00027763212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09441221,0.00013073022,0.00020932918,0.030909054,0.005442084,0.009309004,0.005874841,0.000060066945,0.00007653041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064870305,0.000092503615,0.0001623371,0.04843406,0.0004500599,0.0017859741,0.00040089682,0.0010262888,0.000066809785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005352145,0.00016566375,0.13840634,0.000003758389,0.000041948057,0.0000024950853,0.00005551897,0.0000636065,0.0030224016,0.15347426,0.0011628538,0.70354766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002230896,0.00054858834,0.120772205,0.000023253408,0.000012739576,0.00003819532,0.00092026644,0.011213987,0.0017218004,0.8513746,0.0108353915,0.00030806835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004464194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022336093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70323956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001046683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070924456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124463108","doi":"","title":"Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Citation; Social impact; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.3890825930332159,"score_gpt":0.5668690280760341,"score_spread":0.1777864350428182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124463108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99161804,0.0029402287,0.0027653363,0.001070086,0.00004226366,0.00012936554,0.000009295201,0.0000058333408,0.0014195364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801594,0.001433933,0.000072808645,0.000029299717,0.000044913584,9.407284e-7,0.0000019953195,0.000004640558,0.0003955421],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578595,0.00032349565,0.00043782976,0.00033858384,0.001836552,0.0012775895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974833,0.0005706962,0.00034771554,0.00014700831,0.0012617921,0.00018945357],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021003926,0.0001298525,0.00028535552,0.008879324,0.00026035102,0.00053240726,0.00047981826,0.00009997889,0.00005259452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025099765,0.000077580626,0.00016095376,0.027510818,0.00021300087,0.00042889194,0.000058631438,0.0008226388,0.000001807704],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013080706,0.00014863229,0.12476716,0.0000021287283,0.00011665712,0.000002498628,0.0027772905,0.000011744649,0.001185923,0.017263142,0.0002553045,0.8533387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008372977,0.0019183349,0.62397605,0.000004806269,0.0000070123415,0.000106621424,0.00434366,0.0012010299,0.00003564509,0.3670937,0.00034773967,0.0001280657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013761893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015963023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033182657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006801108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124667861","doi":"10.3386/w25742","title":"In-Text Patent Citations: A User’s Guide","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research; High Energy Physics; NIH Office of the Director; RIKEN; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; National Jewish Health; IFP Energies Nouvelles; National Institute on Aging; University of Washington","keywords":"Information retrieval; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.939468718043896,"score_gpt":0.7311586833684702,"score_spread":0.20831003467542575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124667861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080128405,0.0023848964,0.00002731809,0.003209434,0.0023212207,0.0012330678,0.0003487979,0.000008960748,0.98245347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55058706,0.0076888492,0.0007377835,0.00010776629,0.0010985122,0.00024222836,0.00030282352,0.000080898695,0.4391541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570763,0.00084934145,0.0029954878,0.0016489298,0.036335472,0.0010944846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94042945,0.022199089,0.00096190476,0.0013273002,0.03469286,0.00038941734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14821918,0.0002810675,0.0009703525,0.16583428,0.00016400823,0.0017492283,0.0047069294,0.0006368581,0.0061715115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16114505,0.00023341057,0.0004130079,0.06624294,0.0004188858,0.0008736836,0.0014937721,0.0014397416,0.0065668384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026607113,0.00018278175,0.015465781,0.000050258805,0.000059048856,0.000013936275,0.000039519397,0.0006567341,0.000060816812,0.0712654,0.9034777,0.008701405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067914976,0.00017585994,0.018558655,0.000078950456,0.000003484979,0.000015638454,0.000180987,0.0019816677,0.00007665264,0.33091083,0.64704573,0.00029237557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004675769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044871814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5432994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005323423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018227195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928707},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3124913960","doi":"10.1111/10.1111/1759-3441.12026","title":"The Relevance of the ‘h’ and ‘g’ Index to Economics in the Context of a Nation-wide Research Evaluation Scheme: The New Zealand Case","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Journal ranking; Order (exchange); Citation; Actuarial science; Frame (networking); Scheme (mathematics); Econometrics; Public economics; Economics; Operations research; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Library science; Information retrieval; Geography; Medicine; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.4505971787357604,"score_gpt":0.5478105346053507,"score_spread":0.09721335586959029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124913960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97369975,0.0015019766,0.000005239655,0.015222018,0.00046372032,0.0030921358,0.00006664394,0.000002694781,0.0059458227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98755246,0.010175072,0.00009483825,0.0001256395,0.00014809058,0.00027946485,0.0000031698257,0.000023801951,0.0015974628],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824406,0.0055209585,0.0021814427,0.0013241966,0.007069239,0.0014635593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91578245,0.0753241,0.0007777107,0.0037116983,0.0040561077,0.00034791382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19804735,0.00025097336,0.00054641266,0.01245979,0.0008107416,0.0016590412,0.006457964,0.0003618393,0.00004904344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14323372,0.00012158029,0.00019529379,0.024345186,0.0017308508,0.0002852373,0.005369025,0.002936737,0.00001083847],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002608951,0.00016627107,0.15742032,0.00003181932,0.000057929243,0.000007926029,0.0059949923,0.003931267,0.000059484413,0.0027678418,0.004303121,0.82499814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003589801,0.00040611962,0.45231625,0.00032902934,0.00002419561,0.00013838639,0.05278072,0.15119785,0.0008640245,0.1025755,0.23501255,0.0007655636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029617427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015118846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009995466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030624212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125065800","doi":"10.29024/joa.38","title":"Large-Scale Comparison of Authorship, Citations, and Tweets of Web of Science Authors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology","keywords":"Popularity; Social media; Altmetrics; Workflow; Similarity (geometry); Bibliometrics; Scale (ratio); Data science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5215094072867599,"score_gpt":0.5995611686223555,"score_spread":0.07805176133559566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125065800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846233,0.0060847434,0.0067666476,0.0003781389,0.0007707654,0.00007263045,0.00005300859,0.0000019827207,0.0012487619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836173,0.00065293285,0.015453319,0.000012806193,0.00003356373,2.7013738e-7,5.7255045e-7,0.000006177718,0.00022307031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.984096,0.00034512518,0.002376978,0.0003479462,0.012415109,0.00041883625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703369,0.0066323755,0.0025692084,0.0005029529,0.019421779,0.0005367413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04523766,0.000116554795,0.00082123163,0.090563715,0.000164512,0.00034066712,0.0017190314,0.00012687924,0.00013111408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13406298,0.00008529035,0.00023170972,0.31028116,0.0008516032,0.00072385254,0.0005682234,0.00042115236,0.000003014748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053935502,0.0010680606,0.91788083,0.00006815455,0.000044435405,0.00001635757,0.00206099,0.00024046421,0.02971572,0.002728866,0.0045800516,0.041542113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001615054,0.0013318029,0.8036387,0.00010935186,0.00006701188,0.00006477109,0.012452331,0.014660877,0.14785492,0.010592798,0.0073934123,0.00021898853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008800411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008659404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21971743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007567107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019115144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125199900","doi":"","title":"A Suggested Method for the Measurement of World-Leading Research (Illustrated with Data on Economics)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Universität Zürich","keywords":"Elite; Rest (music); Quarter (Canadian coin); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Regional science; Economics; Social science; Sociology; Geography; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7512992173318096,"score_gpt":0.6026317190154507,"score_spread":0.14866749831635895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125199900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43177685,0.005105907,0.0066037704,0.029076146,0.004273689,0.03734094,0.0055708983,0.00021238478,0.48003942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595488,0.013153074,0.019425035,0.00015941274,0.0006047457,0.00082572724,0.00017284276,0.0001761188,0.005934258],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97689456,0.003166605,0.0026440201,0.004125498,0.010462531,0.0027067778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9262691,0.053981937,0.00095347204,0.008760581,0.009331279,0.00070363766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27609178,0.0005311774,0.001428094,0.06803755,0.0007821906,0.0035326716,0.016053539,0.00054742786,0.00015632079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05933374,0.0003502439,0.00030787248,0.04581725,0.0011231675,0.00041968797,0.0071110465,0.0043477803,0.000033476408],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014390718,0.000523658,0.0021795928,0.000093165494,0.00026724598,0.000016052634,0.00018362078,0.041838564,0.00014907857,0.0026578794,0.004360598,0.94629145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033452848,0.0021400147,0.019448977,0.00076017063,0.00004215469,0.000012397787,0.003121535,0.7309969,0.00204389,0.034083523,0.202835,0.0011701368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042243276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004219171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94512135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002627367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046839453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125514616","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Citation Timing: A Framework and Examples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Receipt; Discounting; Citation impact; Computer science; Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Citation analysis; Subject (documents); Data science; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5239174770497576,"score_gpt":0.5767123746863733,"score_spread":0.05279489763661571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125514616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639471,0.0011565821,0.00022462154,0.000789739,0.0003706448,0.0006840828,0.00013139649,0.000010037026,0.03268575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722715,0.02057692,0.00072654267,0.0000070890414,0.0001198034,0.00006221515,0.000003816566,0.000023652508,0.0012527861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920397,0.0009060353,0.0012250214,0.0011837316,0.0036223903,0.0010231414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463286,0.048652653,0.0005607752,0.0019246938,0.0021172806,0.00041599572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04734525,0.00023404208,0.00056388415,0.029058646,0.00035700965,0.0023786451,0.0031745117,0.00046725493,0.00014563717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10847785,0.00012638715,0.00029579786,0.017225621,0.0010862238,0.00021388887,0.003944344,0.001390932,0.000018200746],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142556,0.00005786736,0.08953907,0.000014001104,0.000053055075,0.0000041910266,0.00027208417,0.00038323723,0.00012293141,0.0016933153,0.00041323484,0.90736556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005080262,0.00037724857,0.46375072,0.00021914174,0.0000037860475,0.0000062466506,0.0012429436,0.01932131,0.00015956794,0.50405127,0.009969394,0.00039035236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001848723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005678967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067466655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011679191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125636821","doi":"","title":"The Graying of Academia Will It Reduce Scientific Productivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Political science; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.33194826975123665,"score_gpt":0.49005279121876205,"score_spread":0.1581045214675254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125636821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95601547,0.0050696023,0.00082636526,0.0051923175,0.017966291,0.0011187829,0.00023110895,0.000074000316,0.013506055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828938,0.0003982177,0.0007962971,0.00009285639,0.0008505795,0.00009092585,0.000014173655,0.000048081554,0.014815053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791624,0.0014240608,0.0028356842,0.003508078,0.01141749,0.0016522832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97168607,0.013270045,0.002883484,0.005269603,0.0060136993,0.00087708206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08900699,0.00066031597,0.0014221348,0.036531966,0.0018984925,0.006144182,0.010292801,0.0012536349,0.00082373974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09897317,0.0004454418,0.00087736873,0.058118597,0.0046851407,0.00096806366,0.0063622873,0.0040400825,0.00076404464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048046786,0.00019793003,0.68161094,0.000086289896,0.00012361356,0.0000075387084,0.00040611424,0.0002442103,0.0017646527,0.0020449064,0.25694486,0.056520876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080359005,0.00018346438,0.247071,0.00028172083,0.000082367806,0.000071551374,0.00075370946,0.004704518,0.009436444,0.03620952,0.6988846,0.001517527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109699205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010104664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4419397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006206788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032658547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125676971","doi":"10.1177/23780231211006977","title":"The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; Santa Clara University","keywords":"Productivity; Pandemic; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sociology; Demographic economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.77604919358679,"score_gpt":0.6606782569336781,"score_spread":0.11537093665311193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125676971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927615,0.008321771,0.003512188,0.051752664,0.0015867004,0.0034472393,0.00019403025,0.00009374817,0.0034766642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677847,0.00052377087,0.00016438341,0.0002263243,0.00011776705,0.00028598844,0.000016901802,0.000014420009,0.03086577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97894764,0.005442449,0.00076535804,0.0015462841,0.011578371,0.0017199025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80498105,0.18571497,0.00029518607,0.001975447,0.0063391477,0.0006941853],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12849751,0.00020978597,0.00047840746,0.006478312,0.005145112,0.002168303,0.004069441,0.00020428475,0.00023322903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4739262,0.00009230318,0.0006980695,0.08641094,0.0063635353,0.00015534674,0.0017327535,0.001599382,0.00011152692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010465449,0.002384328,0.048071824,0.00040614753,0.00046940916,0.00012253363,0.0036793211,0.00032320182,0.021005908,0.1990061,0.42937657,0.29410812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096573157,0.000635358,0.042452935,0.000018847952,0.000013510116,0.0000063940074,0.0038519788,0.005350644,0.00075257896,0.745602,0.20010844,0.00024154087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030615603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041015277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54659593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000836416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026281315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126039589","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18201071","title":"Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Bibliometrics; Scholarly communication; Citation analysis; Open science; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.6260760814279249,"score_gpt":0.6279675711060868,"score_spread":0.001891489678161884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126039589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80125993,0.00023557353,0.000080788544,0.00054578454,0.0004462882,0.0011148336,0.00017560966,0.00001134482,0.19612986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956525,0.0032980232,0.0015918141,0.00003654146,0.00009602703,0.00013178558,0.00004061672,0.000033472646,0.005206465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868567,0.0009680839,0.0019478039,0.0017487772,0.005549607,0.00110006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98487574,0.008987104,0.0007365546,0.0022330242,0.002796853,0.00037072165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04995752,0.00025347466,0.00083175034,0.06835209,0.00019061912,0.010530412,0.015932202,0.00038661758,0.0005376516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036090907,0.00021908166,0.00023108735,0.047001347,0.00056014524,0.0015335369,0.025694957,0.0013768503,0.000046447738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081627804,0.0003066126,0.19622533,0.000042231895,0.000022465481,0.000019906991,0.000089480294,0.005460439,0.0002496136,0.00067020894,0.0017798223,0.7950523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016216597,0.00026018225,0.70522636,0.00018799644,0.000007906937,0.0000049175264,0.0015575261,0.06483436,0.003662949,0.18326287,0.03856787,0.00080539926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001173267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082968466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79424685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007315155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014149137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99049675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126141302","doi":"","title":"Neophilia Ranking of Scientific Journals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Ranking (information retrieval); Publication; Publishing; Journal ranking; Citation; Work (physics); Index (typography); Computer science; Reputation; Impact factor; Focus (optics); Data science; Political science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.5495091212506126,"score_gpt":0.5591364342025403,"score_spread":0.009627312951927758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126141302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95365065,0.021566175,0.017042408,0.0013763503,0.0017233274,0.000120912046,0.000005533941,0.000011920079,0.004502704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211043,0.001818629,0.00027048629,0.000024938849,0.0002518298,9.577155e-7,7.166416e-7,0.000011982843,0.0055100434],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803862,0.00045318544,0.0011730216,0.00047302083,0.014414664,0.003099888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98813564,0.0010661959,0.0007831,0.00063320395,0.008699239,0.00068264303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17346995,0.00014764731,0.00038628612,0.050599955,0.00045748128,0.0037597662,0.003401505,0.00009958479,0.00017887958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041126907,0.00009725649,0.00029026667,0.13544859,0.00028102365,0.0011437922,0.0003924475,0.0018829847,0.00024831633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001665367,0.00033727023,0.13371733,0.0000043765654,0.00014928693,0.000038398128,0.000817915,0.00035849985,0.004509011,0.07176536,0.012933134,0.7752029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010324301,0.00041435688,0.005407964,0.000022493245,0.000010109545,0.000673019,0.002830069,0.00082716986,0.0007218327,0.97870547,0.009196303,0.00015878394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000310552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008050913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081895007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007593134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128633531","doi":"","title":"ORCID AND OTHER ACADEMIC SOCIAL ACCOUNTS OF A CANADIAN ECONOMIST PROMINENT IN THE MEDIA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecoforum Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Library science; Scopus; Freedom of information; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6177065743930763,"score_gpt":0.5448986655532655,"score_spread":0.07280790883981081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128633531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97807753,0.0011092597,0.00001394803,0.013761651,0.0003069873,0.00006849073,0.000054150903,8.662668e-7,0.006607103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980426,0.0006087753,0.000077606455,0.0007540287,0.00019671736,0.0000021404621,7.1180824e-7,0.000004794111,0.00031263212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641824,0.00020451564,0.0005650833,0.00021660428,0.002091829,0.00050372904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763167,0.0010838369,0.00021044843,0.00016634777,0.00062165386,0.0002860526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018606048,0.00007343415,0.00019435091,0.027521105,0.00027545018,0.0009977189,0.0011202747,0.00010047309,0.0009777915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008924039,0.00004333127,0.00007457059,0.051380653,0.00010866817,0.00030870785,0.00016292838,0.00055439584,0.000039556824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017445138,0.000041721803,0.85003126,0.0000041207445,0.000016919312,0.00013847185,0.004699664,0.000005829644,0.0003732801,0.0017730645,0.075448945,0.06744929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067638117,0.000035513687,0.8111895,0.000015974127,0.000003628025,0.00034339473,0.0060293013,0.00033245102,0.00038861574,0.013435749,0.16743843,0.00011109302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002615204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043673318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091989495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012425013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095444353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128850065","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.018","title":"The impact of gender on scientific writing: An observational study of grant proposals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; English language; Curriculum; Tone (literature); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.9770931054240265,"score_gpt":0.7804160686956477,"score_spread":0.19667703672837877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128850065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956257,0.0005088069,0.0005241336,0.0016495811,0.0012436563,0.00014291098,0.000014240681,0.0000015048178,0.00028948265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805945,0.00016418795,0.0012209025,0.00011832529,0.00024036269,8.521875e-7,0.0000011877914,0.0000052084297,0.00018950694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95952696,0.018447332,0.012819061,0.00076982187,0.0077641574,0.0006726739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5428513,0.4170698,0.010564758,0.001833872,0.026713256,0.000967007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3714783,0.00011920015,0.0017751188,0.0069832243,0.00022650273,0.00023700861,0.002242755,0.00017190863,0.0002139379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7190562,0.00005277173,0.001005624,0.033383675,0.0008242397,0.0002915061,0.00035245763,0.0008033774,0.000012527256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026463307,0.0022548502,0.9542604,0.0000024756712,0.000114563,0.000021418335,0.000092300375,0.0012501593,0.00022887772,0.0020414966,0.006806043,0.03266276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083906786,0.004164272,0.9445912,0.000009896587,0.000011618052,0.000023817413,0.0009545124,0.003829844,0.00004640884,0.04499982,0.0004791346,0.00005037485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004049791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016671667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41667566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040600156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017232066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98716223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129446086","doi":"10.1108/lhtn-11-2020-0106","title":"ORCID education: a departmental approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Promotion (chess); Library science; Computer science; Political science; History","score_opus":0.4620305300491584,"score_gpt":0.5378759009917609,"score_spread":0.07584537094260246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129446086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26501706,0.0063388655,0.002364828,0.0077336887,0.0014024654,0.00042269228,0.000066050234,0.00020817293,0.71644616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70112735,0.0006433308,0.07476242,0.0036428599,0.0006537719,0.000099165365,0.00019655867,0.00004354038,0.21883097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385345,0.00020305021,0.0005084262,0.0008411188,0.004139194,0.00045478393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716425,0.0007582057,0.00012045823,0.0010955323,0.00039832375,0.0004632586],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014737974,0.00014335592,0.00024375811,0.01535714,0.00021197935,0.0030881732,0.0018984206,0.000112070986,0.005182608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031998781,0.00010558112,0.00016649076,0.14988792,0.00008587388,0.0019952422,0.0011379212,0.00023489252,0.0010623907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008569855,0.0005673332,0.079138234,0.0000048742463,0.000009336348,0.000031128035,0.000050192568,0.0000030296892,0.0006673401,0.0069928714,0.55397666,0.35855043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026034607,0.000058694066,0.023808712,0.0000048599445,0.0000035676442,0.00008497556,0.0011749949,0.00050850067,0.013319413,0.017263776,0.94329464,0.00021753632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016580912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019252666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4976152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036470905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012159987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131617483","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqaa063","title":"Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public relations; Digital scholarship; Political science; Openness to experience; Open science; Stakeholder; Engaged scholarship; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Library science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.8969408243494004,"score_gpt":0.6130882244822331,"score_spread":0.28385259986716727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131617483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042252085,0.9791624,7.19361e-7,0.00045670848,0.00015018819,0.0017497564,0.0005597499,0.000011862746,0.017486073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002638395,0.9931177,0.000015286845,0.0007977004,0.00006284799,0.0001625713,0.00007143707,0.00003775936,0.0030962997],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98588216,0.0024212666,0.0028936076,0.0010060774,0.0069480278,0.0008488811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886663,0.0075754854,0.0010871504,0.0013208714,0.0009920067,0.0003581761],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0423395,0.00059299,0.0028744412,0.030012215,0.00026944972,0.023336358,0.0127824005,0.0003397216,0.00057092943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065087944,0.00036257954,0.00047775285,0.062085927,0.0008570213,0.005468172,0.004136421,0.0021399118,0.00014361813],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001069156,0.00007790951,0.0018514785,0.0152943805,0.000043994507,0.00021227832,0.00070339814,4.0856534e-8,3.0758113e-8,0.018090088,0.0025615848,0.9611541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001889424,0.00012368354,0.00047951122,0.031140666,0.000048436643,0.000056088156,0.0018971923,3.4396635e-7,1.9549195e-7,0.01288063,0.95279944,0.00038485232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009494894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056944165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021724294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012051106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133161949","doi":"10.3390/women1010006","title":"Women—An Open Access Journal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.8415382076672177,"score_gpt":0.6893801013899552,"score_spread":0.15215810627726245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133161949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95377964,0.000184127,0.00051917724,0.0012337359,0.00079234125,0.00009999694,0.000013947848,0.000012378233,0.04336467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588663,0.00017403609,0.0006205201,0.001103519,0.00022462658,0.000032934502,0.0000019330166,0.000012860256,0.038963296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902706,0.00044329982,0.00058019976,0.00064928894,0.0070605897,0.0009960207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927997,0.0011983376,0.00021206537,0.0010081226,0.0033749638,0.0014067822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032771118,0.00011215193,0.00031818324,0.022197649,0.0004828767,0.0527485,0.012145294,0.0000700103,0.027881963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02410805,0.00007734322,0.000051478306,0.16148311,0.00007755789,0.0047315275,0.0065818643,0.00034291777,0.00091425836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073364514,0.0007001347,0.069858424,0.0000040247346,0.000050422852,0.000558565,0.0038220508,0.000044598804,0.0026397668,0.001843021,0.12213482,0.7982708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009235892,0.0003559087,0.107929915,0.000004295657,0.0000012411206,0.00013005875,0.0075960346,0.00039619443,0.001030363,0.12545142,0.75592345,0.00025751535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020066003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008938699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79801327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005009407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010374059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133906725","doi":"10.1111/jdv.17196","title":"Global publication productivity in dermatology: a bibliometric description of the past and estimation of the future","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Atopic dermatitis; Scopus; Dermatology; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.18854739366658751,"score_gpt":0.4408241137055947,"score_spread":0.2522767200390072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133906725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497151,0.004348104,0.00031616414,0.044609733,0.00046661892,0.00011170469,0.000008364759,0.000001327458,0.00042289638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894136,0.00053465227,0.00025262308,0.00017588204,0.000048202743,5.698565e-7,2.3834228e-7,0.0000037792713,0.000042690554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939072,0.003345445,0.0011083689,0.00023770152,0.0011893887,0.0002118808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597055,0.0008736603,0.0017556859,0.00031643306,0.0010170969,0.00006658363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946456,0.00009943155,0.0004254645,0.020071656,0.00012849914,0.000059216734,0.0014133914,0.00016898691,0.000008312001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723174,0.00004783409,0.00013847933,0.14069498,0.00087538274,0.0003571017,0.0009674225,0.00048709815,8.377576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002948451,0.00008991735,0.97270566,0.000029536795,0.000022161761,0.0000045564025,0.00007600342,0.00007453083,0.0010791975,0.0019894708,0.0023421457,0.021557303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004585654,0.000012044308,0.98257375,0.000023944975,0.000023918188,0.003558827,0.000100523626,0.00046624226,0.0032850897,0.007862933,0.0015931033,0.000041067167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004417326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009193428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12062333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027980628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015322962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955931},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3134658860","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v14i1.637","title":"Evaluating, Improving, and Appreciating Peer Review at IJTMB","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Ask price; Technical peer review; Publishing; Criticism; Psychology; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Preprint; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7675540154809658,"score_gpt":0.7239451200050988,"score_spread":0.04360889547586699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134658860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11724374,0.2821902,0.0070140394,0.51381814,0.009017512,0.0011065119,0.000032766773,0.000028098513,0.06954895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73164546,0.0821622,0.04094597,0.013235995,0.003520665,0.00008073815,0.00003747942,0.00008142562,0.12829003],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593073,0.0038819667,0.0015461484,0.00063566107,0.03408072,0.00054818933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80457425,0.03737441,0.0026839296,0.0011224874,0.1534278,0.00081712747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15766634,0.00017424686,0.00038600323,0.010076008,0.0004508868,0.0037269127,0.0027095706,0.000120549594,0.003357316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48018867,0.00013363351,0.00021757498,0.023035204,0.0001909894,0.0019738367,0.001316435,0.0013537538,0.00019758953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020365795,0.0006411521,0.008974552,0.000043435935,0.00020204799,0.00008108796,0.00041892275,0.00001273007,0.0037040506,0.0014586637,0.08533101,0.8989287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006368697,0.0002936549,0.012213691,0.000441394,0.000064363165,0.0011527429,0.002817195,0.0010318754,0.0008414879,0.009775672,0.97053504,0.00019602182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000692977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001108733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89873266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008309348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042830086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134806533","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/7t9gf","title":"Branding Scholarly Journals: Transmuting Symbolic Capital into Economic Capital","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Safe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Symbolic capital; Capital (architecture); Brand names; Political science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Social science; History","score_opus":0.5349581032269551,"score_gpt":0.5645651400440147,"score_spread":0.029607036817059562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134806533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95457023,0.011584952,0.014206557,0.0017276832,0.0040893974,0.0003991151,0.000059970826,0.00007571691,0.013286394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912214,0.0017030624,0.0036302998,0.00015237178,0.0006861953,0.000022014365,0.000024262143,0.000050625356,0.0025097285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98181146,0.0007044168,0.0024519488,0.0024793209,0.011180873,0.0013719762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876499,0.0043374957,0.0008426319,0.0019072611,0.003976436,0.0012862314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042920023,0.0005723737,0.0013000773,0.09312097,0.00080026715,0.070592664,0.006967181,0.0008199714,0.009893779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02682117,0.0004445328,0.0011126262,0.056429066,0.00023693129,0.0038026194,0.00527539,0.0032047257,0.0013093215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008376053,0.0006950775,0.29522333,0.0002262469,0.0009203909,0.0007964209,0.02251896,0.0065148207,0.009772918,0.006005322,0.012767216,0.6444755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006848845,0.00075995125,0.40761107,0.001301346,0.00030509877,0.000805264,0.09775133,0.110513784,0.020431396,0.32807526,0.017255561,0.008341108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021583424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005137696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63613445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009896259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020958444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135332239","doi":"10.51845/34s.1.18","title":"Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Questions","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Currency; Incentive; Higher education; Analytics; Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Economics; Data science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6089707887367589,"score_gpt":0.6080250362803373,"score_spread":0.0009457524564215891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135332239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810912,0.027160075,0.037579667,0.038104206,0.001465451,0.0004337499,0.00025676127,0.00014167734,0.013767251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522706,0.009425517,0.004136466,0.00090785255,0.00020094316,0.000024250692,0.00001787319,0.000015775773,0.010044291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921579,0.0005824193,0.00097167544,0.0009364362,0.004717354,0.0006342558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821417,0.0123277195,0.00025665393,0.0007150155,0.0037831983,0.0007757329],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014388905,0.0001833363,0.0003432924,0.029029697,0.00042705453,0.0007189692,0.0014905888,0.0005580946,0.0008073985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2124167,0.00014832061,0.00012024456,0.16390255,0.00040068093,0.0009579256,0.00091335364,0.003260637,0.0011010598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011480079,0.00013237262,0.47097215,0.000014015178,0.000052489588,0.000052162643,0.00080233143,0.000026951713,0.0076818536,0.13161752,0.13527283,0.25336385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005821268,0.000071320326,0.45287257,0.000058703026,0.000043086045,0.00015421031,0.0017420303,0.006092782,0.002089886,0.3485717,0.18726002,0.00046155378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006665435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019742763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25290227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001537343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066446443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136394449","doi":"10.3389/frma.2021.655350","title":"What Constitutes Authorship in the Social Sciences?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Globe; Promotion (chess); Task (project management); Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.8782653950798424,"score_gpt":0.6831072878673955,"score_spread":0.19515810721244686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136394449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78599083,0.077105075,0.023872536,0.06209301,0.005063211,0.0011646892,0.00006635121,0.000027440352,0.044616867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837988,0.010152633,0.0038954278,0.0003518559,0.000120637626,0.000012668256,0.0000036014126,0.000007844225,0.0016565236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98072916,0.0024269668,0.000804219,0.0010033197,0.013739999,0.0012963528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98262006,0.013273783,0.00014077696,0.00063725386,0.0030424255,0.00028569804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13318458,0.00015206008,0.00044344066,0.08425694,0.0009606196,0.011521225,0.0029027034,0.00020912987,0.000055752753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12196797,0.00009788893,0.0001171364,0.43503672,0.0018622284,0.0010862239,0.0010431547,0.0013507567,0.000021730377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016152977,0.0003415504,0.6737304,0.00001743318,0.000016492704,0.0004735395,0.0014441619,0.00008053734,0.00002448684,0.03952383,0.1013455,0.18298596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014705401,0.00028599755,0.22428522,0.00007887564,0.000012527514,0.00003625622,0.10820668,0.10636817,0.0002898672,0.42050615,0.13790767,0.0005520326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008786583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118930075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44944513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002151781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009248109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98950493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136742816","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2021.104226","title":"The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Intellectual property; General partnership; Open innovation; Economics; Open science; Knowledge creation; Public economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Management; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.8515611675883188,"score_gpt":0.720693447368452,"score_spread":0.1308677202198668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136742816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.893646,0.00177158,0.000029710216,0.042072654,0.00015029717,0.0005310362,0.000028014276,0.000004890895,0.06176579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98483115,0.00082962064,0.00013437525,0.0002678487,0.000087022534,0.000018434066,3.452256e-7,0.0000063941757,0.0138248075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982298,0.000953059,0.0005771977,0.0006708198,0.014537131,0.000963764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599999,0.009186872,0.00025270053,0.001968057,0.028277485,0.0003149513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.076967746,0.00008472808,0.00017435085,0.018258698,0.0025459377,0.007745758,0.009931601,0.00006254338,0.000061384875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32131895,0.000039769922,0.000047654514,0.49488565,0.0019416692,0.0012805751,0.013252809,0.00049284945,0.000074788804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029073693,0.00015332803,0.034760978,0.00001398899,0.00001292193,0.000007645207,0.0009934036,0.000009386551,0.03160311,0.7232306,0.035315722,0.17386983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064461306,0.00016897419,0.3388201,0.000040621337,0.00000171205,0.000022051754,0.0024430342,0.0026295201,0.1219528,0.32700714,0.20610656,0.00016287235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001407805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016899602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47662696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019797355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007047017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3138654300","doi":"","title":"Stagnation and Scientific Incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Novelty; Productivity; Economics; Scientific progress; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.41562190960107603,"score_gpt":0.5245709629799813,"score_spread":0.10894905337890526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138654300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95054954,0.01158265,0.02833844,0.008118993,0.00031657625,0.00010460098,0.0000053282506,0.000015551988,0.0009683447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935023,0.0035389888,0.00012529576,0.000088704925,0.00013053215,8.328939e-7,0.0000010773507,0.000005900078,0.002606375],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924198,0.00019173458,0.0003841938,0.00046068183,0.004898999,0.0016446371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970338,0.0006120429,0.00019303111,0.00017561486,0.0015905631,0.00039499791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028481316,0.00008820778,0.0001478294,0.012806188,0.0005728419,0.0045529143,0.0011162319,0.000045783843,0.0000997233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01657541,0.000060098122,0.000073922536,0.07319869,0.00018278993,0.0009431951,0.00030160966,0.0010369117,0.00015880652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005117838,0.00006542331,0.066909015,0.0000030440008,0.000037750677,0.000008400606,0.0007653028,0.000020355055,0.004155134,0.16252576,0.002731848,0.7627268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011332501,0.00076684006,0.046360202,0.000008459349,0.000009582048,0.00014758353,0.006687232,0.008005956,0.0005459837,0.8882473,0.04780626,0.0002813179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057551333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002336121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76244545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025258027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014601476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138751991","doi":"10.7202/1075704ar","title":"Un aperçu de la recherche à Bibliothèque et Archives Canada","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"National Science Board; York University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Research Council Canada; University at Albany; University of Toronto; Strong; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Windsor; National Science Foundation; University of Washington; McGill University; Arizona State University; Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology; Yale University; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; University of British Columbia; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.6317529281274052,"score_gpt":0.5616780748897119,"score_spread":0.07007485323769336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138751991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13458231,0.084358305,0.026583547,0.063123845,0.0017833122,0.00025822961,0.00033416384,0.000047918566,0.68892837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56603605,0.07822653,0.1333133,0.0041520344,0.00040829825,0.000030140902,0.000026042688,0.00007172361,0.2177359],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98178226,0.011230286,0.0007383939,0.0011441946,0.0036642817,0.0014405628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.813254,0.18385957,0.00019879226,0.0011628218,0.00025590585,0.0012689199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136377355,0.00032404222,0.00047900164,0.033912167,0.00041062833,0.0040171314,0.0025685432,0.00026823042,0.0032608763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09740758,0.00028254732,0.00028774678,0.16026951,0.0010670767,0.00048479094,0.0016671792,0.0019241779,0.00011002342],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039083407,0.0004142939,0.0467184,0.000052552376,0.00010507681,0.0011343005,0.0025040188,0.0001386728,0.011360342,0.05205818,0.026345288,0.8591298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005067682,0.000084472675,0.15471207,0.00009820668,0.00001827801,0.0002647701,0.0014911828,0.0064618606,0.013256424,0.2033117,0.6193988,0.0003955122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074204564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073781356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8587343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019824786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02217233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138838551","doi":"10.1177/0003122421996323","title":"Creative Destruction: The Structural Consequences of Scientific Curation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Sociological Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Expansive; Citation; Bridging (networking); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Publishing","score_opus":0.650926118561627,"score_gpt":0.6181973579764589,"score_spread":0.03272876058516805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138838551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8878226,0.091179416,0.001012089,0.014097418,0.0004560415,0.0003687973,0.00003842232,0.00001878383,0.0050064093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747725,0.022595515,0.0012313827,0.0008435869,0.000043138352,0.000014977851,0.000008909045,0.0000024182655,0.00048758087],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938306,0.0013525486,0.00069519103,0.0005547974,0.0032816716,0.00028518643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898624,0.004981921,0.00063675223,0.0006367256,0.0037363616,0.00014585961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105431415,0.00010567275,0.0005012617,0.0012383289,0.00043102476,0.0005007637,0.0011787177,0.000039154696,0.0020498259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07246839,0.000046897174,0.00024161565,0.07471401,0.0060364045,0.00026111305,0.0003098041,0.00022576365,0.00009879558],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064621886,0.00003403188,0.034455348,0.00003860641,0.00002750768,0.000012133299,0.00013581985,0.0000043443597,0.0027390285,0.023331072,0.009021713,0.93019396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003114314,0.0007475044,0.5699777,0.00034913592,0.000086692686,0.00018382906,0.0073877657,0.00034738256,0.004781699,0.23857199,0.1767032,0.00055169116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042502263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028319148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92964226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004936737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000375553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139314136","doi":"10.1111/hir.12367","title":"Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Health Information & Libraries Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Peer review; Citation; Inclusion (mineral); Grey literature; Systematic review; Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Computer science; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.7157679003052918,"score_gpt":0.621136672412235,"score_spread":0.09463122789305678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139314136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014274624,0.99390686,0.0007891285,0.0015551501,0.00056566315,0.0007484075,0.0012809564,0.000008324583,0.0011312187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000007663507,0.9948667,0.0038760526,0.00038727568,0.00015725942,0.000025305764,0.0005137932,0.000014689064,0.00015121128],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798651,0.002831914,0.006040598,0.00040546892,0.010177307,0.00067963084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978666,0.004340026,0.0032573687,0.0010319992,0.011784393,0.00092018826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043257374,0.0003583927,0.0028810126,0.047783047,0.00021361525,0.005320509,0.0025804199,0.00037617562,0.0011957287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032369044,0.00023882579,0.00057472097,0.13993642,0.000099402736,0.010897995,0.00061181345,0.0013497225,0.00016683142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008182621,0.00007472303,0.000025611274,0.034674462,0.000020999465,0.0000033517922,0.0012139538,0.00000626405,1.9938339e-8,0.0018881055,0.062246386,0.899838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097184835,0.00015200036,0.00050857256,0.14072233,0.00001942906,0.000041273073,0.00090092927,0.00004910876,9.4867147e-7,0.00048789394,0.8568508,0.0001695081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068195484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011272377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89966846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028747716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009536001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142823547","doi":"","title":"Research guides: ROP299Y/399Y - Reviewing the University of Toronto’s Climate Change Plan to Increase Campus Participation in Addressing Climate Change: Citation Management Tools","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Citation; Plan (archaeology); Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Library science; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.8311221298416661,"score_gpt":0.6014166377792378,"score_spread":0.2297054920624283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142823547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22118358,0.14475338,0.00197769,0.02196116,0.007817432,0.025415262,0.00431741,0.0002930319,0.57228106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5157949,0.45537606,0.00922758,0.0020803763,0.0017183641,0.00070010393,0.0011913738,0.00017261785,0.013738625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98079526,0.0030393687,0.0015354614,0.0014798567,0.011540139,0.0016099075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567396,0.006888482,0.0007026426,0.0017102519,0.004551216,0.0004734478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07348626,0.00034357712,0.000889451,0.024200166,0.0008149323,0.0024878052,0.0035107094,0.00033630375,0.0020058835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019726088,0.00024511505,0.00024551828,0.08336076,0.00021021038,0.0018410659,0.0044295,0.0006581797,0.00022897817],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307028,0.00023181562,0.009528608,0.0009086909,0.000044144665,0.0002173223,0.003626036,0.000027370857,0.000033485077,0.002235762,0.08647161,0.89654446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013937259,0.00050280005,0.48800966,0.006993516,0.00013225181,0.0000072055414,0.04380318,0.0060207536,0.00009819646,0.0006730489,0.45125628,0.0011093689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018444613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01231132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010096245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019524836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145008074","doi":"10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(1).22-38","title":"New Media for Science: Key Features of Platforms with Open Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Scope (computer science); Key (lock); Computer science; Open science; Publishing; Process (computing); Peer review; Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.45154714619089453,"score_gpt":0.6087514323964822,"score_spread":0.15720428620558768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145008074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10667544,0.09690798,0.040862277,0.649778,0.0009620232,0.0018416926,0.00021549,0.000021915608,0.102735154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82910854,0.021446384,0.14161916,0.0014373871,0.00024655712,0.000007355714,0.000007682524,0.000020094585,0.0061068484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881377,0.00013456766,0.00074250984,0.00045576907,0.010113021,0.0004164196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745194,0.011566685,0.00037892914,0.0005406067,0.012131879,0.000862534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041428518,0.00012746024,0.00064281176,0.0030124413,0.00017723022,0.0016017917,0.001607953,0.000083296814,0.0026510446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21775268,0.00006282571,0.000103424965,0.027802063,0.0018266055,0.0010958045,0.0011202344,0.00036170645,0.000008742417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022376979,0.000120935896,0.00025126818,0.000052820757,0.000021246875,0.000026989692,0.00020926079,2.3292509e-7,0.00046348124,0.917307,0.036563832,0.04475915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009959594,0.00052657514,0.003213277,0.0003773771,0.00006482353,0.00037523874,0.0004868647,0.00007241403,0.016301965,0.9081633,0.0692633,0.00015887308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026532958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003463689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7224331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015409923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087711104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943465},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3145570743","doi":"10.1107/s2053273314081832","title":"The State of the Union","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Transformational leadership; Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.13148298212943052,"score_gpt":0.44971142423106764,"score_spread":0.31822844210163714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145570743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671909,0.0008942259,0.019194013,0.00617512,0.0012545537,0.00028472775,0.000013197242,0.000023956029,0.004969311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968366,0.002011056,0.00015109622,0.00005116181,0.000039487935,0.000009964078,0.0000010435156,0.000003940522,0.0008956762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968552,0.00036558657,0.000396217,0.00028340094,0.001887896,0.00021171678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947338,0.0033551652,0.00030170882,0.0004952704,0.0010275414,0.00008652975],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007581933,0.000078933845,0.00011490349,0.004470442,0.0012448392,0.0010149293,0.00079767767,0.000030612107,0.000027743656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074301846,0.000035967183,0.000098962875,0.047009137,0.00063015835,0.0005574865,0.00023436866,0.00015192559,6.161786e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019886756,0.000084352156,0.061658066,0.0000069455637,0.000025451658,9.550795e-8,0.00013628376,0.00022321485,0.013562932,0.007403248,0.0012556703,0.91562384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011783296,0.00006848301,0.14346609,0.0000036999847,0.0000030949993,0.0000027886974,0.00017005135,0.0016572585,0.00004319052,0.07257217,0.78184384,0.0000514906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045229826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004570136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91557235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011648672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004004275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147687620","doi":"","title":"Does Knowledge Accumulation Increase the Returns to Collaboration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Exploit; Frontier; Shock (circulatory); Test (biology); Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Biology; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.41144535761455703,"score_gpt":0.5645683352818716,"score_spread":0.15312297766731453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147687620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116319,0.0002156609,0.000028715664,0.0061703203,0.001952804,0.0026274868,0.0001577172,0.00003379876,0.07718159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769962,0.0027782472,0.00055546436,0.00015193038,0.0005280315,0.00052516913,0.000040453724,0.000042485393,0.018382056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884115,0.0019689982,0.0015646295,0.0019807946,0.004788572,0.0012855327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737177,0.0152156735,0.00047328777,0.0034440407,0.006260851,0.0008884739],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051546033,0.0003495094,0.0006375442,0.04375299,0.00057537557,0.008108641,0.005778396,0.0005946449,0.0007825151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08597344,0.00018497194,0.00022009165,0.05274919,0.00040014728,0.00058734143,0.0072948164,0.0020854217,0.0007033308],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013574144,0.00034093834,0.0451344,0.000044639117,0.000054079806,0.000012715232,0.002242895,0.011270392,0.00033311432,0.0013067084,0.015331526,0.92379284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009569,0.00030141935,0.22296257,0.00015595843,0.000010967412,0.0000041306307,0.007907002,0.20899495,0.0006035323,0.05934931,0.49766648,0.0010867775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006001142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032479116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92270607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017229848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002047594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152872807","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scab030","title":"The Study of Network Effects on Research Impact in Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Robert Bosch Stiftung","keywords":"Centrality; Position (finance); Rest (music); Political science; Data science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.6751627552709869,"score_gpt":0.6534698576863873,"score_spread":0.02169289758459958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152872807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97143185,0.0007731286,0.000003753082,0.004866794,0.00018483945,0.00027652475,0.0000024428473,0.000004300343,0.02245639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989222,0.00018962474,0.000014968096,0.00007437315,0.00013413676,0.00001484496,1.0631403e-7,0.0000033193605,0.00064640155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797967,0.001188428,0.00046983256,0.00076531665,0.01613496,0.0016447525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97174263,0.019672493,0.0001241964,0.0013127903,0.006460541,0.0006873791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11277918,0.0000909214,0.00021543703,0.041222226,0.0012461948,0.00458589,0.0029659914,0.000045195553,0.000023534034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21846884,0.000045726818,0.00004540606,0.46932894,0.0011347141,0.000613077,0.0015795629,0.00039178098,0.000035847886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024287943,0.0005596906,0.32251716,0.000002931347,0.000007327167,0.000028190309,0.0012480923,0.000042667732,0.0005375079,0.021798274,0.018654596,0.6345793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047227772,0.001047026,0.9398053,0.000008653209,5.9156383e-7,0.0000043143746,0.003240495,0.0010490619,0.00028607014,0.036326267,0.017673824,0.00008610757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011858594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003692418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6344932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023291947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040417304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99644744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153675158","doi":"10.1139/facets-2020-0040","title":"Are we paying-to-play? A quantitative assessment of Canadian open access research in ecology and evolution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Index (typography); Open access publishing; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Ecology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.9069796821772832,"score_gpt":0.7299915060222031,"score_spread":0.1769881761550801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153675158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97876245,0.00045211997,0.00022840172,0.013160508,0.0001954953,0.00045906543,0.000094151714,0.0000022071501,0.0066456264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733454,0.00026218727,0.0016016392,0.00013386451,0.000007682913,0.00003503709,0.0000026878708,0.000005114328,0.0006172198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941784,0.00097178237,0.00044820074,0.0006996067,0.0030619837,0.00064003107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99082744,0.0046691317,0.00014645114,0.00047578226,0.0033233215,0.00055785105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023028402,0.0000762679,0.0003172843,0.09538893,0.00019138749,0.002714396,0.0027289905,0.00010098623,0.0003176842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028429022,0.00006385203,0.000027449538,0.23935978,0.00013596234,0.0007656345,0.0031486615,0.000332902,0.0000570692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009071813,0.000077677745,0.97378826,0.0000059655686,0.000006364403,0.000103238664,0.00026937918,0.00013782011,0.0005024018,0.005264368,0.013376539,0.006458888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030248196,0.000113974565,0.9730319,0.00002262458,7.562247e-7,0.000003229119,0.0027261018,0.0018098193,0.00017512937,0.009449786,0.012290264,0.00007396469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08864816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5618527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47320455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004666834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020346632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153953002","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5840","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Neurology Articles Published in General Medicine Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAMA Network Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Specialty; MEDLINE; Impact factor; Neurology; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Library science; Computer science; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.5422063564878029,"score_gpt":0.57587535029638,"score_spread":0.03366899380857713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153953002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584919,0.0064296382,0.0010591769,0.018852716,0.0005095035,0.000202594,0.0000141453465,0.0000065652193,0.014433737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993892,0.0016254793,0.0011163135,0.0016653639,0.00029487925,0.000010425763,0.000013655845,0.0000099881845,0.0013718633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870072,0.001737954,0.0020356833,0.0009868667,0.00734575,0.0008865515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98178923,0.010167226,0.0007722165,0.0013488266,0.0054139476,0.00050855294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.073090464,0.0001595263,0.0012093108,0.7339129,0.00013596019,0.0049170665,0.0050506755,0.00020043468,0.014006324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09985737,0.000107762135,0.00024425078,0.9810525,0.00019616616,0.0016692022,0.0030193946,0.0005198188,0.000044232685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068570036,0.00011730236,0.7879011,0.0000012626346,0.00015517855,0.00011164532,0.000049696722,0.0071793003,0.00018162513,0.0005835317,0.06561124,0.13803956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008607019,0.00012601614,0.93599534,0.000011162432,0.000057584333,0.000009235019,0.00007650433,0.04155332,0.00010572597,0.009901418,0.011195714,0.000107270316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010893681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072917173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24713965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004536513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029758931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155094413","doi":"10.1177/22925503211002456","title":"Identifying Predatory Journals in Plastic Surgery: A Prospective Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; McMaster University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Checklist; Directory; Publishing; Web of science; Subspecialty; Home page; Psychology; World Wide Web; Medicine; MEDLINE; The Internet; Medical education; Family medicine; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.6082756874266116,"score_gpt":0.5389160202164178,"score_spread":0.06935966721019382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155094413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850324,0.0017689604,0.0017991093,0.00006006963,0.010779105,0.00019443248,0.00003601705,0.000037311667,0.0002926054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915725,0.00016829625,0.000045536748,0.000016703432,0.000213597,0.00005157495,0.000004009435,0.000025346115,0.00031770105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835986,0.001215078,0.0018767151,0.0013339394,0.010865366,0.0011102838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45320734,0.5396537,0.0007029852,0.0011602624,0.0044596237,0.0008160353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038497467,0.0002774079,0.0010362086,0.06959429,0.00028708606,0.003944302,0.0009624793,0.00013937631,0.0024184946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68335116,0.0002237093,0.000362668,0.18004726,0.00012282538,0.0010807264,0.0008154021,0.000643979,0.00070078496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050637293,0.00083075004,0.9805026,0.000012349467,0.000046944962,0.0019405787,0.00023894766,0.00009746613,0.00018970622,0.000014733173,0.010141608,0.005933646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003091253,0.0000321292,0.99415064,0.000089048,0.000011838378,0.000057124515,0.002293677,0.0010426895,0.0002860959,0.0007790763,0.00068410905,0.0002644695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006354819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017605757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64485365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031429192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014913657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155168871","doi":"10.1037/cap0000280","title":"Update on publishing excellence in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Excellence; Publishing; Library science; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5803279467869964,"score_gpt":0.5557508892005159,"score_spread":0.024577057586480544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155168871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6249803,0.002799539,0.00012422282,0.15221056,0.014101004,0.0009976374,0.0015648587,0.0001539121,0.20306796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90680325,0.0013587801,0.0008085807,0.0856998,0.00045561863,0.00017456539,0.00026917638,0.00014492826,0.0042853192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97431505,0.0018840695,0.0028477774,0.0064622364,0.002949435,0.011541409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701361,0.002633216,0.0006617089,0.0071242466,0.0038022865,0.01564243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030258708,0.0012777793,0.0017037985,0.08355245,0.0012354212,0.004106401,0.011923671,0.0022852693,0.010266224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06259092,0.0012452437,0.00055837847,0.119057074,0.0012810901,0.0018850719,0.00046086573,0.0041297176,0.0041894824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011006444,0.00028660605,0.16257769,0.000008119926,0.00008534514,0.013146244,0.0004663073,0.00008936623,0.00026366502,0.0067935344,0.6090458,0.20712726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017386305,0.00032225286,0.38554034,0.000044659813,0.000011867506,0.0004553453,0.0007636816,0.000108138425,0.000027781954,0.017163975,0.59278756,0.001035755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28182295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006785237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009867158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155654304","doi":"10.2478/adms-2021-0001","title":"Advances in Materials Science Editorial on the Journal’s 20 <sup>th</sup> Anniversary","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Materials Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Physical Laboratory; Politechnika Koszalińska; University of Manchester; Indian Institute of Technology Bombay; German University in Cairo; University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy; Politechnika Czestochowska; Politechnika Warszawska; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Chalmers Tekniska Högskola; Politechnika Gdańska; University of Queensland","keywords":"Materials science; Engineering physics; Nanotechnology; Library science; Polymer science; Art history; Physics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.17158062782026937,"score_gpt":0.506170310979133,"score_spread":0.3345896831588636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155654304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94511694,0.0031273288,0.00019521586,0.0012774866,0.043514397,0.00041018054,0.00010045695,0.00002480232,0.0062332223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842145,0.010538237,0.0010145255,0.00030580355,0.0035670074,0.000021166205,0.00000204033,0.000016418884,0.00032033224],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.97746557,0.0010443842,0.0015910589,0.0016813506,0.01635138,0.0018662796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874307,0.0054416233,0.0007586978,0.0015979428,0.004211531,0.0005594967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.085587226,0.00035195664,0.00067584054,0.02489971,0.0014709233,0.0077283136,0.008936623,0.00013101572,0.0018955632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0750268,0.00021791228,0.000073925374,0.15629874,0.0039724046,0.011484946,0.002069318,0.00050049456,0.00037347892],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033867385,0.00038659718,0.0066923355,0.000027684326,0.0000026640548,0.00026330544,0.0010806451,0.0081260605,0.93710554,0.0063195145,0.005384184,0.03427282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011972712,0.00041779538,0.008281523,0.00022217017,0.0000046239074,0.00010508461,0.0046859607,0.0006109499,0.7471396,0.05057914,0.18604343,0.00071246416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048405494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000512336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18996592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006459132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024081005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156857722","doi":"10.1101/2021.04.14.439880","title":"How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact in research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Impact factor; Public relations; Scholarship; Infographic; Political science; Psychology; Library science; Accounting; Computer science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.66034381259884,"score_gpt":0.5706484058998011,"score_spread":0.08969540669903886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156857722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891264,0.006427667,0.0005530544,0.0018326873,0.0006192826,0.0008163314,0.00049589656,0.00007444173,0.000054237167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952834,0.0012000492,0.002993721,0.00004693104,0.00021033187,0.00011306658,7.9257956e-7,0.000065935455,0.0000857571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783904,0.002228881,0.0013272921,0.0030481457,0.013206293,0.001798975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97788805,0.0049933004,0.00061415863,0.003474297,0.0116401585,0.0013900338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061197452,0.0005882077,0.001221031,0.052529044,0.00036995023,0.017669844,0.0038586005,0.0009180022,0.00017131385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11163472,0.00047044616,0.00030363485,0.1365483,0.0005794527,0.0009011115,0.0077996417,0.0028881403,0.00006736674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005506781,0.0005078248,0.86810875,0.00021004419,0.000100531994,0.0003600523,0.00004328228,0.000081788516,0.123705156,0.0008362578,0.005799101,0.00019214327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005685119,0.00009562158,0.98029715,0.00015336758,0.000008346287,3.8141664e-8,0.000060856728,0.00088792597,0.013677598,0.00007375904,0.0035739692,0.00060287956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013286853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009367923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11218838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006831243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002816318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157754712","doi":"10.1093/jae/ejab008","title":"Does Experiencing International Research Collaboration Permanently Affect the Impact of Scientific Production? Evidence from Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Economies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Impact factor; Production (economics); Political science; Economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.4956450253441177,"score_gpt":0.5801244604068394,"score_spread":0.08447943506272171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157754712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889673,0.0019536673,0.000076891425,0.005179012,0.0025827123,0.00012482502,0.000040335573,0.0000028718648,0.0010723694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965738,0.00048028264,0.0004594095,0.0000041821827,0.00044791843,0.000005053164,0.0000012155987,0.000006107727,0.0020220014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922995,0.0008106153,0.0010574722,0.00046322515,0.0050231195,0.0003460998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97420144,0.008527633,0.0009910329,0.0007257289,0.01534453,0.0002096174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030447142,0.000106542015,0.00033898797,0.01513926,0.00047223733,0.0042657894,0.0022698077,0.000049724524,0.0011722768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07851378,0.000047743113,0.0002801319,0.047507584,0.00067343196,0.0021688826,0.00052650046,0.00035638915,0.00003710654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008155153,0.0008600241,0.46531808,0.000014480916,0.00056831527,0.00010099664,0.06543013,0.0071831257,0.18016243,0.0003614679,0.21161929,0.06756616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076249853,0.0010294769,0.597587,0.00021176695,0.00003087776,0.00009487231,0.16775192,0.005517948,0.174167,0.021373354,0.031102397,0.00037086967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012160206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001015951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18051688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005637189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018918762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157857527","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvab048.888","title":"Publication Model, Ownership and Impact of the Top Endocrinology Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Government (linguistics); Bibliometrics; Medicine; Popularity; Library science; Test (biology); Internal medicine; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.48344321838547577,"score_gpt":0.5648659022913172,"score_spread":0.0814226839058414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157857527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95959026,0.0030137456,0.00096145814,0.035037715,0.00051496166,0.000089129404,0.000020931506,0.000002360885,0.0007694298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495,0.0008978927,0.0009239739,0.0003578751,0.0001337254,6.560722e-7,1.7776344e-7,0.000006072089,0.0027296406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364454,0.00042392415,0.00095364655,0.00020609728,0.0043800487,0.00039177053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98990506,0.0014625367,0.0012514411,0.00070840184,0.0064694863,0.00020308595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080335345,0.0001075394,0.00033614357,0.002357526,0.00025932697,0.0007645962,0.0022184758,0.000051432424,0.00030758246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0318966,0.000042781634,0.0011251138,0.03727647,0.0002467965,0.0005255599,0.0011010482,0.00066436443,0.0000025960617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003337474,0.0002642672,0.6789316,0.000010778931,0.00031384052,0.000009071322,0.0006255142,0.0027708076,0.018786734,0.0014034631,0.2558709,0.04097964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013038908,0.00013872441,0.9291664,0.000031152325,0.000055770277,0.0010198366,0.000975621,0.012392725,0.013414407,0.030357335,0.011000815,0.00014335873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013859424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021631563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25023475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014606619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079652906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98318666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159603454","doi":"10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105645","title":"Pharmacological Research: A bibliometric analysis from 1989 to 2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Pharmacological Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.8563292422533881,"score_gpt":0.7268144297834334,"score_spread":0.12951481246995478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159603454","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10433623,0.030581873,0.0010477017,0.0096903825,0.81464815,0.0056073903,0.008967027,0.00037218956,0.024749065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101788096,0.031327393,0.0016169021,0.00069248746,0.80354625,0.001670411,0.0017012128,0.00020465044,0.057452593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8189553,0.025205068,0.003589417,0.0082901865,0.13629349,0.007666549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.414021,0.4623607,0.00085295376,0.004515528,0.10795752,0.010292286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29646719,0.0012401196,0.003887698,0.8812339,0.0027774763,0.020668264,0.027789092,0.004002427,0.07972295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6512687,0.00085701956,0.0022067977,0.9786605,0.0023639367,0.00094101083,0.027114635,0.021841025,0.025735363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006770989,0.0019207463,0.00130495,0.000014639064,0.0018619307,0.0018030609,0.000074337164,0.00013731243,0.0061614444,0.0000376486,0.92234635,0.06366049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014831608,0.0013793532,0.007581026,0.000030209887,0.0005020883,0.0000013146692,0.00025760234,0.001902376,0.001862473,0.0034191923,0.98056793,0.0010132516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033254665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016981135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43715563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032378652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00613628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161634579","doi":"10.2196/29507","title":"Authors’ Reply to: Redundancy of Terms in Search Strategies. Comment on “Searching PubMed to Retrieve Publications on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Search Strings”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Information retrieval; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Data science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.821415364529672,"score_gpt":0.6541132984116215,"score_spread":0.16730206611805054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161634579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1486703,0.00020159745,0.0022731726,0.8433161,0.00036297538,0.0013126322,0.00020212072,0.000007416539,0.0036536914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84412646,0.00059970206,0.0002476696,0.1485574,0.0008302436,0.00012150332,0.000060773913,0.000042759948,0.0054134694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89870834,0.013387743,0.004848499,0.001685307,0.07906102,0.0023090944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87530303,0.099918924,0.0013752107,0.0029362987,0.016702836,0.0037637108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.271116,0.00043084586,0.002327755,0.15498368,0.0002666933,0.0034464747,0.0152934445,0.00092885474,0.0037835625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26557484,0.00025450543,0.0009096232,0.23063882,0.0013725972,0.0003793595,0.0043533533,0.016395938,0.000053890697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005329459,0.00067814434,0.01907765,0.00007631003,0.000869381,0.0005123978,0.0040780012,0.00088417024,0.00005152117,0.0023648122,0.96050596,0.010368689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012930956,0.0038126681,0.035947114,0.00096264406,0.000084125706,0.00006792567,0.011731501,0.005901986,0.0008766136,0.0016572092,0.937204,0.00046111617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003644034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043538475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002637494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075796773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161776032","doi":"","title":"Potential Canadian Contributions to Challenge Area 1 — Science Investigations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concepts and Approaches for Mars Exploration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.6676703809152691,"score_gpt":0.5253014860566976,"score_spread":0.14236889485857152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161776032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63419247,0.0014659002,0.31781372,0.032656033,0.0015855302,0.0025442196,0.00080536515,0.000058665537,0.008878107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641424,0.000036615067,0.0025980766,0.00019565214,0.00018374578,0.00017791291,0.000042880703,0.000006861488,0.00034398265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965643,0.00006298854,0.00033413176,0.0004714041,0.0018405841,0.00072657544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599004,0.0004067194,0.000093186754,0.0003300334,0.0016966294,0.001483392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008889294,0.00011440203,0.00016210703,0.01128634,0.0011215713,0.00153556,0.00064275024,0.000076142554,0.000046946352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013017108,0.00008920744,0.000053933738,0.028633459,0.00045541828,0.002285882,0.00018399756,0.00009480883,0.000053230826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027748327,0.00023388355,0.01177808,0.000010830719,0.000020293784,0.0000010948963,0.005800259,0.001150376,0.002810435,0.4957924,0.021447726,0.4609269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022054736,0.00090577995,0.09814591,0.00003318846,0.0000590944,0.000018145362,0.021234635,0.15503728,0.0071220635,0.16852741,0.5452603,0.001450731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062638876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010195274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020165807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005262004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162055002","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20211085","title":"Gendered Citations at Top Economic Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Information economics; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.5186671143313683,"score_gpt":0.5418338010536898,"score_spread":0.023166686722321583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162055002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89058274,0.0020996274,0.000013631117,0.0034906014,0.00020725644,0.00005801603,0.000015385487,0.000010896391,0.10352184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98416686,0.001639007,0.00062815985,0.0003702736,0.00009189241,0.000005025356,0.0000018041782,0.0000067500155,0.013090228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701244,0.00001733286,0.0003763673,0.00050172413,0.0017427483,0.00034936308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974321,0.0007898329,0.00013164712,0.00013738777,0.0011338753,0.00037512308],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042674546,0.00009269564,0.00018780644,0.0069234534,0.00043728505,0.0027181199,0.00045550277,0.000074631986,0.0034187045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00534935,0.00006894793,0.00008820361,0.02241147,0.000080620426,0.00044646076,0.00039886887,0.00012669305,0.0002623179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002042501,0.00004435334,0.6915952,0.0000100051575,0.000041970943,0.000022420823,0.0010485597,0.000005616809,0.044613574,0.007272568,0.098607466,0.15671785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006690875,0.000093291135,0.5746921,0.000011920197,0.000012520965,0.00017704075,0.003826849,0.0010204575,0.0066261664,0.017007245,0.3955694,0.00029392654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000149452135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015703306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29696196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008673376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014767952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163219630","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/rqwea","title":"Fake collaborations: Interdisciplinary science can undermine research integrity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scientific integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Academic integrity; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.8797457237471681,"score_gpt":0.7091312008736873,"score_spread":0.17061452287348078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163219630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5924136,0.0014430579,0.010114394,0.03560391,0.00903718,0.0035167944,0.0007239871,0.00018689146,0.34696016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95819134,0.00022948947,0.0029144003,0.00015081224,0.00024997705,0.00008780672,0.000032036703,0.000028038989,0.03811613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518704,0.0011424805,0.001663529,0.0035048074,0.039926723,0.0018920884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93085194,0.012909888,0.00053932745,0.0055933315,0.04879724,0.0013082938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15185748,0.00043225317,0.0008713167,0.2106572,0.0016951314,0.019752564,0.017393308,0.00067992794,0.001990702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12237361,0.00029234862,0.00028218515,0.44048792,0.0032841153,0.000967041,0.060737632,0.0050889254,0.0025258858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013743801,0.0014431761,0.06797353,0.00016827257,0.00009232952,0.00012833095,0.0030509392,0.0028066947,0.0027244703,0.06821386,0.69554484,0.15771611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008620145,0.0007941832,0.065116145,0.00023986687,0.000016068761,0.000027021495,0.021621171,0.12780222,0.0038731678,0.7424931,0.0356887,0.0014663369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077178737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009594633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6742792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019858584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014833283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995285},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3163374609","doi":"10.22452/mjlis.vol26no1.7","title":"The internationalization of Chinese scholarly journals based on publications deriving from the G8 countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province; Government of Jiangsu Province","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Political science; Library science; Discipline; Web of science; Chinese academy of sciences; Regional science; Geography; Business; International trade; MEDLINE; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.19250478796630904,"score_gpt":0.4673025271239805,"score_spread":0.2747977391576715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163374609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.811713,0.0011862033,0.07236512,0.09527627,0.0014386849,0.00019161523,0.000113281436,0.000015315052,0.01770054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627346,0.00031535694,0.0015096848,0.0015678323,0.00011528694,0.0000020187263,0.0000066336574,0.0000037599918,0.00020597651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98722446,0.00030283933,0.0014517225,0.0001586666,0.010600758,0.00026153194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97935426,0.0074541573,0.0020863633,0.0006963517,0.010149025,0.00025983388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020423902,0.00010162729,0.00018581572,0.012053256,0.0010027691,0.021376956,0.0046698246,0.000042736345,0.0009153825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07187665,0.000048073052,0.00016061636,0.08679616,0.0005412262,0.036164563,0.00034513403,0.0003744605,0.0000530667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004491699,0.00005720018,0.9122648,0.000002705585,0.00001943629,0.0000028908062,0.0010287932,0.0054179397,0.00046679308,0.01564923,0.011219462,0.05382582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030554645,0.0000682779,0.8879389,0.000046668647,0.0000037967097,0.000027316702,0.0013694982,0.03810627,0.0024397727,0.0073009273,0.062315837,0.000077172605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029814819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.908102e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18456048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000632277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002392407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163855067","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0251488","title":"Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Top-down and bottom-up design; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.8861340694074553,"score_gpt":0.5914378414414244,"score_spread":0.2946962279660309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163855067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701881,0.000811937,0.002191332,0.014059096,0.00018437646,0.00036572348,0.00005166379,0.000012340265,0.012135459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269485,0.00007783939,0.0041756006,0.00006694925,0.00013101888,0.000010723279,0.0000029854366,0.000011564464,0.0028284497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834969,0.001022271,0.0008274059,0.0005668187,0.013250307,0.0008363094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695638,0.01735316,0.00029004176,0.0016017077,0.010899066,0.0002922407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05903594,0.00010490063,0.00038750833,0.015476971,0.00075657887,0.0010411147,0.0035340465,0.00007066125,0.00046994534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13261619,0.000057634697,0.00013355503,0.18245575,0.00080913067,0.00019972815,0.0028324346,0.00070106686,0.0001758808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010729865,0.003680282,0.6066897,0.00031886878,0.00046109868,0.000033489076,0.005612316,0.00021618497,0.14569268,0.14839344,0.01374396,0.07505071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091039273,0.0006075184,0.343951,0.0007929342,0.00008180855,0.000011518686,0.03370763,0.29723018,0.21800591,0.09839145,0.00571578,0.00059386966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011015256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000262392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.297014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001978732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035577943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164382659","doi":"","title":"The Fall of the Innovation Empire and its Possible Rise Through Open Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Intellectual property; Productivity; General partnership; Open innovation; Economics; Open science; Knowledge creation; Public economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Market economy; Management; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.3621927008974681,"score_gpt":0.5484679756458216,"score_spread":0.18627527474835354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164382659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715368,0.013400019,0.0007887334,0.00849484,0.00038101492,0.00016751653,0.000003715875,0.0000024834098,0.0052248747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851779,0.008767601,0.00007493863,0.000111423244,0.00004534797,0.000002053048,1.5762294e-7,0.000004643901,0.0058159647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141777,0.00027915838,0.0005872694,0.0003836768,0.005597158,0.0017349874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073505,0.0011548935,0.00045088516,0.00055318937,0.007005581,0.00010040018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0677465,0.00008497171,0.00015431264,0.005052061,0.0018470987,0.004771211,0.006051215,0.000044069337,0.000021197042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042787,0.000038423503,0.0000621519,0.20622215,0.00042024633,0.001416965,0.0024556092,0.0010480953,0.000012200779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028713222,0.00008570318,0.040288642,0.0000021775909,0.00003191694,0.0000034581603,0.00034187987,0.000018903098,0.008577048,0.7211558,0.0011170795,0.22834867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005121124,0.00015922768,0.056125704,0.000018820107,0.0000057622815,0.00031064666,0.003518843,0.000824289,0.014004296,0.9160999,0.008316437,0.00010396132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055539283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004048898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2282447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039028615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011443749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164514146","doi":"","title":"Publishing trends in the International Journal of Sport Psychology during the First 50 years (1970-2019), with a particular focus on Asia and Oceania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Political science; Social science; Geography; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09065119268014045,"score_gpt":0.33708080366100157,"score_spread":0.24642961098086114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164514146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915468,0.00009873074,0.00030072872,0.0063250507,0.00006939288,0.00008040539,0.0001641483,0.0000059904423,0.0014087139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873877,0.00011740085,0.00024236883,0.00004646286,0.0000325605,2.1704e-8,0.000004927945,0.000007775029,0.0008097243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961725,0.00016892578,0.00030835645,0.00042777593,0.002622804,0.00029963534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714285,0.00039770914,0.0005934573,0.0005583718,0.0011719859,0.0001355993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004261791,0.00014594228,0.0003844904,0.005265857,0.0002368488,0.0002830005,0.0023777315,0.00014436088,0.00046975468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032719405,0.00010155206,0.00019613093,0.0079043815,0.0004953872,0.0003415911,0.0005040836,0.00041178128,0.000053452695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084411964,0.0002093805,0.96443564,0.000006741394,0.00015896975,0.000828981,0.02382357,0.00012659484,0.000038006947,0.00015693293,0.0010914764,0.008279617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032944363,0.00013267915,0.87872124,0.00006031591,0.00004301631,0.00010907909,0.106437996,0.00015292023,0.000018536302,0.00091419497,0.009965736,0.00014987834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018790672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003838509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0857144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063065614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012526433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51434845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164682760","doi":"10.1177/09610006211016533","title":"How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Literacy; Information literacy; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.42365335728596165,"score_gpt":0.45484211218195625,"score_spread":0.031188754895994597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164682760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221679,0.0025375872,0.04004464,0.028341262,0.00021582963,0.00014783195,0.00001871612,0.000008337211,0.0065178755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97565717,0.00085589883,0.022365188,0.00084469246,0.0000317016,7.401699e-7,0.0000010283526,0.0000031471234,0.00024041612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931803,0.00024474144,0.001142808,0.00020842742,0.0049363608,0.00028737722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924311,0.0020953189,0.0013707352,0.00041021258,0.0031370039,0.00055564044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017771345,0.00009352339,0.00029416053,0.043825127,0.0002497448,0.035185177,0.0022430595,0.000112355534,0.000021718344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08210986,0.000071015245,0.000041085965,0.110097446,0.0003294996,0.24522173,0.0011930712,0.00072549755,0.000001538456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457016,0.0000417603,0.36826822,0.000041618743,0.000010666587,0.000008051593,0.026244136,0.0009344829,0.003819506,0.10036659,0.0057829013,0.4942975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00115599,0.00023426182,0.794661,0.00039431753,0.0000061352953,0.000070906746,0.036204178,0.018244883,0.005167685,0.059045218,0.08453358,0.00028183914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015746204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021770925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49401566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005709189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015392929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165220065","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-480702/v1","title":"Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mega-; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.7924712251922145,"score_gpt":0.667428192781796,"score_spread":0.12504303241041848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165220065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97069615,0.012202318,0.007872146,0.003129335,0.00084321015,0.0011610737,0.00052252103,0.000025062203,0.0035481756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98677975,0.007256294,0.0011309879,0.000018662311,0.0001303979,0.00008008181,0.000091920396,0.00002602441,0.004485862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9601,0.0020151401,0.0013406939,0.001661636,0.03385869,0.0010238645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490942,0.012455523,0.00047358556,0.0025291233,0.034685224,0.00076237344],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.074666545,0.0002573581,0.0008215637,0.07229491,0.00044480592,0.006593195,0.0035407932,0.00038523632,0.0017147695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18198991,0.00020007516,0.00038327806,0.11651995,0.00046331104,0.00048622672,0.011361432,0.002147861,0.00006871459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016412181,0.00041321348,0.79098594,0.0019804074,0.00011222361,0.00011553613,0.0017877378,0.00011545212,0.0008080487,0.0014054137,0.02737075,0.17488888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040519377,0.00015335342,0.95502144,0.0015212534,0.000015531481,0.000009268972,0.009270977,0.0027076944,0.0016141089,0.012670571,0.016183324,0.00042727432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011491377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014040183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1744616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022979813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010997319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165371237","doi":"10.20913/1815-3186-2021-1-25-42","title":"Science of science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bibliosphere","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Citation; Big data; Creativity; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6055228389306013,"score_gpt":0.6101202218160866,"score_spread":0.004597382885485279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165371237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410751,0.0014142619,0.00076310016,0.0004811526,0.00072084315,0.00007408469,0.000010723784,0.00001743391,0.1554433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881585,0.00017665625,0.005769548,0.000093044786,0.000036468122,0.000001648626,2.8250517e-7,0.0000056662097,0.005758176],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760843,0.000071128474,0.00063127896,0.0010478892,0.021352759,0.00081265066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97648925,0.001376045,0.00024249978,0.0016183712,0.019621609,0.0006522009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033616193,0.00010826678,0.00026709746,0.17850284,0.00063383445,0.0035506107,0.00567611,0.00005173384,0.0035496382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08802174,0.000077565244,0.0001124877,0.90310335,0.005177239,0.0020982597,0.0023229588,0.00016922608,0.0004698326],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012614667,0.00037908452,0.08892864,0.000011490335,0.0000065556674,0.00006489171,0.00018281964,0.00008527391,0.5724074,0.08698835,0.029256146,0.22167669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045696658,0.00018092638,0.32194474,0.000019397408,0.000004177032,0.000045846205,0.001860365,0.003506058,0.6078269,0.023512105,0.0403643,0.00027824563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035422123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008145947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096045864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00628855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165405438","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2021.05.009","title":"Evaluation of Open-Access Journals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Directory; Medicine; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Observational study; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science; Pregnancy; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.48713758103991484,"score_gpt":0.5498045149921652,"score_spread":0.06266693395225037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165405438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198954,0.059957575,0.00010047608,0.0008751927,0.015017166,0.00022861583,0.000030369127,9.1469235e-7,0.0038942697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602175,0.0030826204,0.0004761905,0.00023868444,0.0000153378,0.0000033640233,0.0000011893801,0.000009729419,0.00015116156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867931,0.0013909832,0.0021588167,0.00051403313,0.008579434,0.00056364754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8835474,0.086068206,0.0025268407,0.0005912689,0.026450196,0.0008160625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038007986,0.00017322354,0.0009410543,0.026889054,0.00017317933,0.0019833404,0.0026864826,0.00024362117,0.002598865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.608702,0.00014010124,0.00008619387,0.079402,0.0001773992,0.0013342049,0.0019669873,0.0006652447,8.81646e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001576745,0.00011352513,0.38400567,0.000006873756,0.000041073727,0.0008896798,0.0000380852,0.00025527817,0.000023472154,0.00014047904,0.0015709946,0.6129133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030948166,0.00021832556,0.9752502,0.0000038162902,0.000059838283,0.00007800841,0.0007203205,0.0021114366,0.00019359407,0.00990835,0.008211474,0.00014983625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005628702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02529593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61276346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018693743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126048215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165769365","doi":"","title":"A scientometric analysis of the science system in Tanzania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Universiteit Stellenbosch; Polytechnique Montréal; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Robert Bosch Stiftung; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Tanzania; Scientometrics; Geography; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.24629676303025,"score_gpt":0.46431148390683685,"score_spread":0.21801472087658685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165769365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8940315,0.001443584,0.000060535807,0.000029269264,0.0016762774,0.0003871761,0.00009816856,0.000018945344,0.102254495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95251834,0.00025331046,0.00013553417,0.000009005812,0.000019973926,9.115019e-7,0.000034098513,0.000016049751,0.047012787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769354,0.0008179775,0.0010986336,0.0018732437,0.018335136,0.00093963003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98385596,0.0022487126,0.0011232945,0.002461906,0.009831791,0.00047831534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0267574,0.00034178782,0.0011811898,0.4675346,0.0008670399,0.0022686305,0.01100009,0.00041902257,0.000454487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031343855,0.00025621682,0.00095546385,0.8840366,0.0005906075,0.001369335,0.0015502007,0.0011282195,0.000060807935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040005078,0.0015564938,0.8555868,0.0004932213,0.0017795705,0.0007707192,0.004327379,0.003657627,0.02148021,0.041168794,0.001605132,0.06717394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083371,0.000076571334,0.9297858,0.00022306146,0.00071491115,0.00000391628,0.03265823,0.0063374853,0.0056233224,0.00006750851,0.023072304,0.0006031868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006729053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013381928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41650197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014075543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003499724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165949093","doi":"10.82308/5582","title":"Working in the lab : social organization of research and training in biomedical research labs in Canada and its relationship to research funding","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Medical education; Business; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.6855037452262233,"score_gpt":0.5490594650064561,"score_spread":0.13644428021976718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165949093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921053,0.00022131922,0.0000011427213,0.0010428265,0.00014803687,0.0007191846,0.000035954232,0.0000070272345,0.0057192226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00008288363,0.00015226826,0.000049340364,0.000041777806,0.000024376735,0.0000055950527,0.000027088596,0.00023655035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97079766,0.0055712718,0.0015595941,0.0012957309,0.018369328,0.0024064044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520733,0.042913232,0.00012155511,0.00046328962,0.0038679359,0.0005607141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30663037,0.00017545691,0.0004137038,0.07463842,0.0017766102,0.00073459547,0.002143192,0.00031545624,0.000075520365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2106565,0.00014137733,0.000025895259,0.32384026,0.0004804536,0.0006853419,0.001785081,0.0038437487,0.000022925244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001276907,0.00019367535,0.6981252,0.0000358756,0.000006520781,0.00028976603,0.0012370485,0.000014973208,0.007824107,0.10898441,0.000058906287,0.18310183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000909371,0.00020167996,0.9236015,0.00017825825,0.0000010654004,0.000015985925,0.025159745,0.00021549965,0.00191389,0.04153705,0.00604257,0.00022339112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17447619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7836756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60919946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026284603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010708869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166733659","doi":"10.56042/alis.v68i2.40763","title":"A scientometric analysis and visualization of the 50 highly cited papers of Eugene Garfield","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informetrics; Citation; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Popularity; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.46229539959037325,"score_gpt":0.5310908397427637,"score_spread":0.06879544015239047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166733659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879799,0.0041706865,0.00013184399,0.0016971019,0.000093677474,0.0001314954,0.000105291365,0.000005587986,0.0056844503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349594,0.005673332,0.000067607274,0.00044599923,0.000004048152,0.0000046678038,0.000005745121,0.0000013864985,0.00030127188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614817,0.0001567532,0.0007596401,0.00012639654,0.002682536,0.00012651682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683994,0.0014176491,0.00068436045,0.00023169156,0.0007699956,0.00005639187],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038031829,0.000064324995,0.00029672627,0.048528302,0.0002625918,0.00015435023,0.00049352366,0.000023049068,0.00016390749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003990402,0.000038630238,0.0001081732,0.23729847,0.0002562724,0.0032649708,0.0011572643,0.000056058198,3.4221486e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010617907,0.000113539856,0.89537597,0.000109012726,0.00058615115,1.7166604e-7,0.004184318,0.00084263907,0.00051899784,0.025244597,0.012118777,0.060799662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589713,0.0003067358,0.94248354,0.0000082980205,0.00004387837,5.968862e-7,0.0065435623,0.0023355535,0.012328308,0.0012121317,0.03439262,0.0000858258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074476093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2332365e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18877017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022873055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004206711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96225584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167630218","doi":"10.29173/cais1224","title":"The burden of article processing charges on Canadian universities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Institution; Scholarly communication; Resource (disambiguation); Business; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1883200148984631,"score_gpt":0.4087411580688233,"score_spread":0.22042114317036018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167630218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638751,0.00043256363,0.000007070887,0.0083781835,0.00011997934,0.00013384156,0.00011745751,0.0000072985335,0.026928503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996364,0.0001518066,0.00009572244,0.00007966161,0.00005439693,0.0000033275412,7.099577e-7,0.000008378694,0.0032419718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549264,0.000052853396,0.0005518563,0.0003526779,0.003016867,0.00053313514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83639807,0.0015415841,0.00080544205,0.00038513835,0.160516,0.00035377083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046101306,0.0001484483,0.0003476931,0.0038708767,0.00040928862,0.0068455297,0.0035955694,0.00010524898,0.000068852794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09724777,0.00008764366,0.00016248116,0.022260135,0.0006768173,0.004250746,0.00074280903,0.00025191787,0.00000703476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042034572,0.00042827,0.3863196,0.00036109018,0.0002548172,0.000020483796,0.105757244,0.00014060999,0.08971028,0.10572118,0.033713687,0.2771524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009261623,0.00057409174,0.28197104,0.00041300684,0.00006216655,0.000032103828,0.1369365,0.006254697,0.31142482,0.022553157,0.23835438,0.00049789506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056197713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005730542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27665448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119046184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167786700","doi":"","title":"Rankings of Canadian Universities with Regard to Research in Economics at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Business Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Productivity; Positive economics; Economics; Classical economics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3810775587525595,"score_gpt":0.461887675585484,"score_spread":0.0808101168329245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167786700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827622,0.00024255244,0.000025044343,0.014555986,0.0009636729,0.0001785478,0.00001490014,6.269822e-7,0.0012564793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986191,0.00067152106,0.00005822607,0.00010439907,0.00011979957,5.2643384e-7,1.8201767e-7,0.000007522051,0.00041877115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947781,0.00038968623,0.0006348169,0.00016125593,0.0036033741,0.0004327999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872006,0.004165056,0.0005815986,0.0008698336,0.0054482105,0.00021525673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03310374,0.00009405514,0.0002833284,0.03270397,0.00041289383,0.00030604508,0.004401899,0.00007667987,0.00016133866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041593616,0.00003705555,0.0000861044,0.1013945,0.0013781842,0.0004178642,0.000868369,0.00071257737,0.000008950504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036483791,0.0005417431,0.7046052,0.00010756254,0.00027082433,0.00012409691,0.071411915,0.03370564,0.009597206,0.006916733,0.08875828,0.08031237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009515051,0.00017434439,0.82451296,0.00013766151,0.000019523766,0.00014013766,0.0337771,0.00021430395,0.0032596234,0.001649466,0.13502076,0.00014262792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022634098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11911426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11990769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028272864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015570893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168126397","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/gj4aq","title":"The Globalization of Science: The Increasing Power of Individual Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; Strong; McGill University; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Curiosity; Global network; Global public good; Work (physics); Public good; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Neoclassical economics; Law; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.4004936075288349,"score_gpt":0.5645794587077106,"score_spread":0.16408585117887575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168126397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96501094,0.00077805854,0.0021193677,0.00097211124,0.00066529796,0.00010550375,0.00001716287,0.000004613975,0.03032693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827564,0.000053435404,0.0006491336,0.00006753638,0.000011079214,9.446929e-7,7.277121e-7,0.0000021559015,0.00093932904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98139775,0.00034936483,0.00062913325,0.00039419308,0.01684572,0.00038382734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98210365,0.0063597523,0.00033843273,0.0010264212,0.010022616,0.00014915447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07528259,0.000062102205,0.00014124348,0.01076644,0.00093233277,0.0033023788,0.00411743,0.0000347717,0.00037508697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1133628,0.000026080492,0.00008679974,0.2717132,0.003072505,0.00045170428,0.0017678489,0.000088760695,0.00002093507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036275793,0.00032505486,0.3699569,0.0000062600643,0.000036797333,0.0000065122567,0.0017953297,0.000108251304,0.038482007,0.32443517,0.0232011,0.24161032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025800208,0.000072067705,0.89257735,0.000009473952,0.000006736847,0.000022166278,0.006444565,0.001975467,0.06290437,0.017418018,0.018218452,0.00009335593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006151706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022700984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5226204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040357576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010848166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168137565","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v7.32145","title":"\"The IR is a Nice Thing But...\": Attitudes and Perceptions of the Institutional Repository","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Perception; Medical education; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Nice; Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Publishing","score_opus":0.3230787922797111,"score_gpt":0.4549300534203716,"score_spread":0.13185126114066054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168137565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95721644,0.0144273685,0.00022584105,0.02184265,0.0012948004,0.00006925357,0.000038896153,0.0000020677874,0.0048826966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947331,0.0005413118,0.0002540322,0.00084723823,0.00025983035,7.909477e-7,2.7558266e-7,0.00000542208,0.0033580153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561095,0.00039055521,0.00082343724,0.00022628713,0.0026021206,0.00034662167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369675,0.0031177066,0.0004463452,0.00041192464,0.0015026707,0.0008246195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007567628,0.00008820306,0.00019337385,0.0052098907,0.0012755414,0.001531204,0.0023696527,0.0001802579,0.0001717342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02281697,0.000047933616,0.00016935177,0.024770748,0.0007804406,0.0011933558,0.00021578834,0.0011221373,0.0000075049006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009445124,0.000010170687,0.9279863,0.00000930437,0.000044954613,0.000105682026,0.0012485618,0.000036603396,0.0019523362,0.013145828,0.04130349,0.014147314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022183353,0.000028818191,0.9228661,0.0000931462,0.000013339957,0.000990409,0.0027345878,0.00014502887,0.0015254689,0.016129794,0.05516263,0.00008885589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005487968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004200824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037516657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012040787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008060493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168378160","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.14723481.v1","title":"“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Computer science; Constructive; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Key (lock); Peer review; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.6298690099803244,"score_gpt":0.6269340447212391,"score_spread":0.0029349652590852093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168378160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85368735,0.041300192,0.013464123,0.012584991,0.003179087,0.0035736277,0.000051959312,0.00021154628,0.07194715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494142,0.00561682,0.019061306,0.004179896,0.001118358,0.0006246514,0.00019418832,0.0001172837,0.019673329],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97715837,0.00074288726,0.0016236816,0.002574762,0.01690803,0.0009922445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703824,0.004752855,0.0005485551,0.0031372153,0.019942774,0.0012361967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070540294,0.00045289207,0.001229323,0.028470337,0.00031585133,0.0068459096,0.005196838,0.00042827276,0.0015821535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20684806,0.00035414784,0.0005246645,0.11678265,0.00008622261,0.000503397,0.0075066746,0.0014609687,0.0007522014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016236252,0.00026947216,0.013729045,0.001047945,0.000103629114,0.0002876505,0.00046598268,0.00013799098,0.0038554757,0.00012287108,0.3678685,0.6120952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009791907,0.00043118277,0.12516858,0.010073773,0.0001559862,0.00009679031,0.0020304294,0.003324686,0.026319573,0.0049773157,0.82347655,0.0029659204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021474443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035442696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60912925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003880758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050891365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169848230","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003","title":"Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Operationalization; Psychology; Test (biology); Empirical research; Econometrics; Dispersion (optics); Social psychology; Statistics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40184467338185004,"score_gpt":0.5088002697968736,"score_spread":0.10695559641502361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169848230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923694,0.0020557034,0.00045715048,0.0042228303,0.000090139205,0.00027235184,0.00041846576,0.000015178539,0.000098760065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568504,0.0010798556,0.0009908184,0.0004885405,0.00007953961,0.000015504946,0.00027691244,0.000017859522,0.0013659096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140775,0.0002453121,0.0010325683,0.001273194,0.0057218485,0.000319352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97574943,0.019311663,0.00023490758,0.0010417168,0.0032443078,0.00041800126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004307048,0.00022164077,0.0003948362,0.0046647815,0.0009906635,0.002741964,0.0015756965,0.00016011704,0.0018499936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096761905,0.0001295475,0.000038392714,0.023149107,0.00034991244,0.0006968097,0.0026450634,0.00030303764,0.00003366329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350879,0.0007446285,0.9731975,0.000007814864,0.000008005637,0.000055571818,0.0004119231,0.0000053027616,0.0011000251,0.00063813094,0.008298753,0.015498827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010850203,0.00007955969,0.9818957,0.000041869647,0.00003116783,0.000069384936,0.0006185091,0.00027541016,0.00058903405,0.010518393,0.00458525,0.0002106923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004168792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006546141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09245486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000885854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005102222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170565256","doi":"10.3145/epi.2021.may.14","title":"Letter. New Google Scholar section with information on funded publications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"El Profesional de la Informacion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Geological Survey; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Health Research Council of New Zealand; UK Research and Innovation; National Institutes of Health; Vetenskapsrådet; CHDI Foundation; Autism Speaks","keywords":"Section (typography); Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public access; Political science","score_opus":0.3197258988707971,"score_gpt":0.5281324956147102,"score_spread":0.2084065967439131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170565256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67788047,0.00016859021,0.064339824,0.015893929,0.0014619841,0.0007194447,0.00006141698,0.00021663237,0.23925772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657731,0.0001276813,0.008001136,0.0072203055,0.00044407006,0.000049692593,0.00019506193,0.00001397594,0.018174956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928942,0.00027589037,0.00059141795,0.0002833452,0.0055249985,0.0004302022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994928,0.0014084635,0.00027314315,0.0005597514,0.0024233332,0.00040731305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009293229,0.00014382045,0.00015702765,0.013408275,0.0006153625,0.003044136,0.00077598274,0.00019544677,0.0007941402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013668828,0.000099915844,0.00008986668,0.051195547,0.000072460374,0.005230901,0.0002885571,0.00078048225,0.0012057931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002962963,0.00028520476,0.048061058,0.000022884766,0.00003691963,0.000012732834,0.0010356825,0.0010378705,0.0011216714,0.05972811,0.5657379,0.32262367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008110774,0.00018902514,0.13634743,0.000018031109,0.00000365541,0.000059833535,0.0002160832,0.0027168083,0.0029646468,0.005702555,0.8508141,0.00015672397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027481283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008537305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32246694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024416184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011154024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173679898","doi":"10.19044/esj.2021.v17n21p316","title":"Use Of Altmetric And Bibliometric Indicators To Measure Scientific Productivity In The Fields Of Life And Earth Sciences: Case Study From Haiti","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Scientific Journal ESJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Bibliometrics; Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; Citation; Web of science; Rank (graph theory); Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Library science; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Data mining; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.6382513559673828,"score_gpt":0.4979921611889623,"score_spread":0.14025919477842053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173679898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941424,0.0028383622,0.00048249555,0.00041308225,0.0012012529,0.0004304378,0.00006198329,0.0000057380294,0.00042423277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983215,0.000061664534,0.0010122303,0.00005898707,0.000066051114,0.0000017676381,9.455055e-7,0.000011010199,0.00046587086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98103803,0.0037099288,0.0015112141,0.0015539035,0.01152684,0.0006600829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871147,0.0062948256,0.0007556003,0.001320641,0.0037525895,0.0007616125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.110411175,0.00020729243,0.0005198029,0.34265924,0.0013396996,0.013135436,0.0022288105,0.000052739204,0.00012020396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10998394,0.00012700888,0.00012252454,0.7531861,0.0015389514,0.0014572113,0.0014699519,0.000625853,0.000019495512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002971338,0.0011529551,0.79232407,0.000012464025,0.00003596368,0.0017628518,0.015605288,0.0001541892,0.0029321522,0.000029340217,0.0043202075,0.1816408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010545437,0.0007615522,0.9404731,0.000056508125,0.000031620726,0.0011681288,0.048144933,0.0006289867,0.0016717482,0.0004538873,0.0052238684,0.00033113573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025176577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034911616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41052687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023872752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079387776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174891973","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.015","title":"“Evidence-based checklists” for identifying predatory journals have not been assessed for reliability or validity: An analysis and proposal for moving forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Matching (statistics); Scale (ratio); Scope (computer science); Guideline; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Medicine","score_opus":0.9363805130465965,"score_gpt":0.7299491902987689,"score_spread":0.2064313227478276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174891973","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3535864,0.0007379166,0.62956464,0.014365474,0.00099374,0.00060747756,0.00013262844,0.000006509051,0.000005185455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6320565,0.001107616,0.36292472,0.0021179498,0.0012837965,0.000063003274,0.000013280245,0.00002471936,0.00040841382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97599655,0.008363111,0.009894365,0.0014172271,0.0032990542,0.0010297141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28872564,0.67166585,0.009446396,0.0013397909,0.02696158,0.0018607602],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.466217,0.0002739962,0.0041077896,0.0128956,0.00046749084,0.0011388531,0.0019738378,0.00067062705,0.00019555073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.92802197,0.00016897071,0.0029359532,0.018435445,0.00048011003,0.0016635904,0.0003641664,0.0008896163,0.000001482325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003535638,0.0006013237,0.904924,0.00018058743,0.00053258217,0.00002143541,0.000035203535,0.0013943627,0.00047531392,0.00043917107,0.0057824003,0.08207803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034022212,0.0039876434,0.6410055,0.00013723424,0.0008390463,0.00003250107,0.00037300267,0.24147785,0.0011809529,0.09960552,0.007657991,0.00030055264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024235424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001449057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6872709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016023598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038954415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3175239229","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Citation Management With Zotero: Create a Zotero Record for a Legal Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal citation; Citation; Legal research; Business; Political science; Law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.7003338207509366,"score_gpt":0.6137667461557369,"score_spread":0.08656707459519974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175239229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04472372,0.0050248904,0.12761658,0.01542954,0.0074958014,0.009745654,0.0013791847,0.00032349303,0.7882611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016274491,0.0018228805,0.078858644,0.0007078283,0.0011397128,0.00093013735,0.0003831426,0.0001619453,0.8997212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96778506,0.0012366564,0.0021599156,0.0033302142,0.02323827,0.002249868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96089715,0.014374355,0.00064267195,0.0028295913,0.020280361,0.00097589585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05831511,0.00067336916,0.0012388623,0.14519365,0.0012289946,0.02227536,0.004620515,0.00064049667,0.0029082524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025186803,0.00044210855,0.0005729398,0.22313066,0.00050040166,0.0015647195,0.002541758,0.0014295713,0.00044104515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002238613,0.00019773365,0.00016897905,0.00018024491,0.00020151515,0.009190796,0.00006809659,0.000019379791,0.000013178057,0.0034752595,0.8051293,0.18113166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013650754,0.0013021531,0.00024313419,0.00021988983,0.00005898322,0.0008799746,0.00482371,0.0022594638,0.00020102553,0.002966766,0.9850357,0.0006440893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060594813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003938987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18048757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007105147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001359557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175903833","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00142","title":"Uncited papers are not useless","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Citation; Poisson process; Measure (data warehouse); Poisson distribution; The arts; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.891090757630023,"score_gpt":0.6925934581402525,"score_spread":0.19849729948977046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175903833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95996046,0.0066522975,0.001234763,0.0054115476,0.0018087005,0.00020088226,0.00006135336,0.000057484383,0.024612518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98882616,0.0008174264,0.0051590707,0.00059673865,0.000035210556,0.000012333646,7.563201e-7,0.000007665982,0.0045446283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98343843,0.000329726,0.00062994147,0.0014144084,0.013281062,0.00090640923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96510273,0.009803979,0.00039701676,0.0009799021,0.023262316,0.0004540475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024447503,0.00019784759,0.0005168364,0.02313167,0.0015793527,0.002207353,0.0024427592,0.000045901914,0.00026363888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21965176,0.00012893062,0.00015264504,0.2961609,0.0034523446,0.0012308001,0.0016914536,0.00023433212,0.00067927386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010342143,0.0007277112,0.35552168,0.00004528731,0.0002903465,0.00056479784,0.013564999,0.00047245124,0.19692591,0.24811321,0.03949209,0.14417809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007787551,0.00039537874,0.6622147,0.00006765635,0.000019915762,0.000019263067,0.19331397,0.004047748,0.079455644,0.021271031,0.03767609,0.00073982816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017764445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008479386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30669305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022257645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008001083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176225318","doi":"10.1145/3463274.3463359","title":"Towards a More Structured Peer Review Process with Empirical Standards","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Process management; Empirical research; Peer review; Business; Programming language; Political science","score_opus":0.4179059071787115,"score_gpt":0.6254396821821306,"score_spread":0.20753377500341913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176225318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7250865,0.02374579,0.2299976,0.017158555,0.0006369853,0.0014092696,0.00014746962,0.00012919225,0.0016886102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96113265,0.0011607304,0.036575682,0.0004982896,0.000057356665,0.000109631015,0.000059886395,0.000021189675,0.00038458372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817023,0.0001635877,0.00047228596,0.0005478231,0.016813628,0.00030031742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98830533,0.000780272,0.00009743478,0.00034333218,0.010274815,0.00019882186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023210805,0.00014735213,0.0003170516,0.004494478,0.000074039395,0.0007816319,0.00034831246,0.000063570405,0.00086478284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059112463,0.000100995276,0.000045096025,0.038386036,0.000030460405,0.00039031138,0.00015350981,0.000354619,0.0000023395366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015958563,0.00014152574,0.43049052,0.00046962968,0.000043500884,0.00008055152,0.0006330712,0.01254423,0.00006737345,0.0002317378,0.009643277,0.5456386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012350524,0.00009650244,0.85535634,0.0005226606,0.000030746287,0.000037875896,0.0005582723,0.103378706,0.00019655137,0.0008840855,0.0373697,0.0003335371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038129742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008198741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5453051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027470273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017162742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176767185","doi":"10.1177/05390184211019161","title":"Science needs more external evaluation, not less","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Information","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Accountability; Reductionism; Democracy; Political science; Diversity (politics); Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Epistemology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6218952172951284,"score_gpt":0.6203810530267898,"score_spread":0.0015141642683386136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176767185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.878792,0.00004079759,0.008407916,0.0024732766,0.0013500589,0.00023383532,0.000016875036,0.00003105258,0.108654216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997952,0.000010933178,0.0006926164,0.0007970478,0.00013304653,0.000010991121,0.0000041196736,0.000002427708,0.0003968417],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639658,0.00011194794,0.00077873014,0.0004309243,0.03388918,0.0008234412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97407454,0.00044416072,0.0003812718,0.00052733783,0.0241576,0.00041507598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06927175,0.00011713455,0.00017609939,0.048385087,0.002844801,0.011257238,0.003591628,0.0000755895,0.00050976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06267474,0.00009198653,0.00009580491,0.40710837,0.0024631592,0.014761983,0.0011090925,0.00022016805,0.0005551372],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070084207,0.000038676866,0.008171032,0.0000025130773,0.0000013806925,0.0000012145193,0.0053985077,0.00012218261,0.013093487,0.048522983,0.001343081,0.92329794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008137803,0.00007523996,0.7879102,0.000012260387,0.0000095270325,0.00002492701,0.032177795,0.09344259,0.042323727,0.018356368,0.024408577,0.00044497583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003756999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036768922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92285293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007449181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072270036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177002457","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.05","title":"The Internationalization of Chinese English-Language Humanities and Social Science Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Chinese language; Social science; Scopus; Library science; Independence (probability theory); Citation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; History; Business; Law; Linguistics; Art; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3766237174427705,"score_gpt":0.5214296935725878,"score_spread":0.14480597612981733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177002457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773024,0.007121388,0.0012258383,0.0044302046,0.0012460935,0.00003579996,0.00000925096,0.000003344721,0.00862573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977211,0.0003969532,0.0004667952,0.00021204894,0.0005608221,3.5065122e-7,5.877621e-7,0.000005183524,0.000636203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98403054,0.00033859574,0.0011606126,0.00022383392,0.0139597505,0.00028668545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94222903,0.003933757,0.0014657668,0.00024230074,0.051975895,0.00015322548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07876782,0.000083058796,0.00024436266,0.02049959,0.0009991993,0.16382742,0.003180064,0.00007599081,0.00010979765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3731158,0.00004627178,0.00013180531,0.05665412,0.000446689,0.067421444,0.00095528073,0.00093576644,0.0000011531877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055231783,0.0001705745,0.6709627,0.000015118804,0.000086849024,0.00008102615,0.029011572,0.000025266922,0.034046415,0.03487774,0.009990748,0.22067676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012440145,0.00015038077,0.84735906,0.00007161159,0.000015766207,0.00029106662,0.05346568,0.0006470265,0.0040422897,0.04806052,0.044448126,0.00020442593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009679425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008814577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29434797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012934847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008348691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179761068","doi":"10.1007/s11192-021-04022-w","title":"Who profits from the Canadian nanotechnology reward system? Implications for gender-responsible innovation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Productivity; Gender equality; Work (physics); Gender gap; Field (mathematics); Reward system; Gender disparity; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economic growth; Economics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7142155899698618,"score_gpt":0.5720511809625689,"score_spread":0.14216440900729288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179761068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75225896,0.0053738216,0.12223459,0.08652956,0.0062336493,0.0030111545,0.0038453657,0.00028603058,0.020226851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871114,0.000056965102,0.0074114073,0.0009952169,0.00017037883,0.00013601624,0.00010601946,0.000022839473,0.0039897715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989327,0.0003286738,0.0010745901,0.0013810998,0.0066530323,0.001235561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643256,0.010315587,0.00045109878,0.0023425946,0.021968225,0.00059687515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033165045,0.00020754372,0.00037970368,0.13651237,0.0020832922,0.0051373127,0.004239121,0.00036119917,0.00013091152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.214897,0.00014171036,0.00016813431,0.7040871,0.00032989582,0.00051083567,0.00079573895,0.0004001644,0.00031384965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017402523,0.00010357132,0.2631528,0.00001617454,0.0000510756,0.000012722141,0.00030389905,0.00007667996,0.0048008636,0.40350473,0.16648428,0.1614758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006402486,0.000085325424,0.5062875,0.0000151238755,0.00002088473,0.000024672576,0.0010532852,0.0030936648,0.006847499,0.055856086,0.42571914,0.00035653266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007166742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023359679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56757474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001132596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005349234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181031621","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Citation Style Guide: McGill 9th Edition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Citation; Library science; Computer science; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.492068636886433,"score_gpt":0.5428247172731383,"score_spread":0.050756080386705316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181031621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020262171,0.001991209,0.025444562,0.0084120035,0.019466257,0.0009666392,0.0036753023,0.00030613894,0.93953526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019712995,0.004448274,0.0056607286,0.0015604001,0.0032699218,0.00007486197,0.00032258127,0.00009688406,0.982595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697716,0.0005568203,0.002449429,0.002090202,0.023898121,0.0012337848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96961117,0.014478948,0.0011854776,0.0021101355,0.011811726,0.00080252456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032710083,0.0005470709,0.00092339184,0.13210587,0.00062337244,0.004009131,0.0054813647,0.0009235233,0.021743467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1270158,0.0003161424,0.00056571956,0.1584542,0.00030049175,0.0017739017,0.0014561127,0.00063203805,0.012731898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067238843,0.0000473945,0.00014344994,0.000011717773,0.000022478813,0.000012290413,0.0000096876365,0.0000012882681,0.00007840708,0.0016054156,0.75726265,0.24079853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041498165,0.00018777327,0.00086990703,0.000074566786,0.000014588439,0.000008246097,0.00014510083,0.00029569253,0.00045557623,0.027481439,0.96956027,0.0004918385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029150108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006949583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24030669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005605386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067129376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182380638","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2021.4032","title":"Stars and Brokers: Knowledge Spillovers Among Medical Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Productivity; Degree (music); Identification (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Entrepreneurship; Star (game theory); Computer science; Industrial organization; Economics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Physics; Finance","score_opus":0.3401180911245082,"score_gpt":0.5539872394611265,"score_spread":0.2138691483366183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182380638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80221397,0.00067602965,0.003748509,0.0011907413,0.001366607,0.0002004951,0.0000053269227,0.000035077956,0.19056328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779922,0.00036385446,0.0018163574,0.00027637745,0.000035020243,0.0000064013548,9.789459e-7,0.0000060576167,0.019502752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795287,0.00013462263,0.0004978374,0.0015662952,0.017354572,0.0009179601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951436,0.0008954503,0.00012476095,0.0010465133,0.0016568608,0.0011328113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03499466,0.00014786507,0.0002245221,0.027563076,0.0008052398,0.0056637893,0.0037411216,0.000060703864,0.0015460646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021747248,0.00011163617,0.000075936056,0.21422382,0.0027328527,0.0014453674,0.005193727,0.00019789189,0.00054852356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006628135,0.00031327218,0.36641014,0.00002856031,0.000019698853,0.00059826666,0.0003199221,0.000018205175,0.0006495778,0.034885596,0.043181166,0.55356896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005483103,0.000052825857,0.8736139,0.00003328613,0.0000070197657,0.000019009602,0.0014413173,0.013413319,0.0008423081,0.0037834295,0.10598291,0.00026239836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030089557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007115277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5533066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016064165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040906016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183736878","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3890190","title":"Loss of New Ideas: Potentially Long-lasting Effects of the Pandemic on Scientists","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Harvard Business School; Northwestern University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pandemic; Workforce; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Scale (ratio); Demographic economics; Political science; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18565149584556434,"score_gpt":0.4804168689104461,"score_spread":0.29476537306488176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183736878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94066876,0.014928448,0.040107727,0.0003615684,0.0032396826,0.00035162893,0.000008922897,0.000009047557,0.00032423332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98747206,0.008596292,0.00020255845,0.000029924338,0.0002803518,0.0000023474438,0.0000021862213,0.000023532506,0.0033907497],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98006475,0.000857642,0.0015536717,0.00095383864,0.013910609,0.002659507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814523,0.0034759904,0.0022737035,0.0014288364,0.0042985855,0.00037764775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040395703,0.0003271273,0.0008139998,0.023539523,0.00034117437,0.001694586,0.0066527156,0.0003433729,0.00007156099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050550926,0.0001951732,0.00097164634,0.07320533,0.00032253654,0.0002646597,0.00331051,0.0055042533,0.000017044582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015201728,0.0006204747,0.36249918,0.00025366113,0.00066872075,0.00009945728,0.00050529797,0.0045402385,0.0050041433,0.008879659,0.0010747798,0.6157024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025126021,0.0011250745,0.3453745,0.0024276103,0.00017795406,0.00089029083,0.00085620617,0.0012652469,0.009431986,0.6349427,0.00026927973,0.0007265351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021915256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006694761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62606305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010347152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018446654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188905274","doi":"10.7202/1081290ar","title":"Les impacts d’une évaluation bibliométrique standardisée : le cas des publications de sciences sociales au sein d’une section universitaire multidisciplinaire","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Valuation (finance); Art; Economics","score_opus":0.7402084679695938,"score_gpt":0.6060275506975462,"score_spread":0.13418091727204762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188905274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7749406,0.00402148,0.11127387,0.04611559,0.0010746004,0.00044027605,0.00009861218,0.00009573299,0.061939258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405594,0.0063225664,0.032925107,0.00008874493,0.00044664313,0.00003151766,0.000077030716,0.000041908686,0.019507105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97635555,0.01622081,0.00085071684,0.0012604591,0.0039408426,0.0013715973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95696723,0.03362033,0.00062123704,0.00083915255,0.007013699,0.0009383631],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10428611,0.00038169333,0.00045066173,0.032603893,0.0038095058,0.0038354546,0.001448457,0.0021984112,0.00041212473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14633943,0.0003931913,0.00034172728,0.24262847,0.004012923,0.0028844972,0.0003663227,0.0022684059,0.0000588781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007088061,0.0014581985,0.12906317,0.0002191057,0.00018435052,0.00004063272,0.22957136,0.0034849297,0.019117657,0.04178566,0.018385233,0.5566188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00119057,0.0003167073,0.55100256,0.00021351068,0.00013459299,0.00024707502,0.26234064,0.01559675,0.014614856,0.1332819,0.02032879,0.0007320802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028619366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021583399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55588675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039001487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068130374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189118421","doi":"10.1017/s1049096521000858","title":"Editor Fatigue: Can Political Science Journals Increase Review Invitation-Acceptance Rates?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.4848384918129678,"score_gpt":0.6170856190753933,"score_spread":0.1322471272624255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189118421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55457026,0.011859679,0.0064328816,0.2661144,0.020804442,0.0019131628,0.0012866003,0.00031384095,0.1367047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709274,0.00048858405,0.0028393052,0.02160653,0.0028537195,0.000027839176,0.000008261044,0.000026904288,0.0012214129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95899576,0.0006547293,0.00215376,0.0023296615,0.027396329,0.008469749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442686,0.008842322,0.0005252182,0.0029476583,0.027915798,0.015500429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04822829,0.00048155975,0.00094539893,0.019726561,0.002366916,0.008527228,0.0075621377,0.00019150204,0.0019335503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44711414,0.0003693539,0.00035104094,0.16961478,0.008795683,0.0029330223,0.0026056815,0.0010033265,0.0006546272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028112374,0.0002686418,0.02743204,0.00006459744,0.000006179352,0.00009229406,0.000049918344,0.0000020281914,0.0032388824,0.9464544,0.019803926,0.0025842607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009480163,0.00038323266,0.42488536,0.000829304,0.00008056501,0.00052811677,0.0025024521,0.003973951,0.03976553,0.47328186,0.051172245,0.0016493453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010599446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004435825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47317255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002990703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01852793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190211635","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2021.1959183","title":"Violations of Standard Practices by Predatory Economics Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Publishing; China; Poisson regression; Sample (material); Predatory pricing; Geography; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Population","score_opus":0.7551132185371355,"score_gpt":0.6597411787950701,"score_spread":0.09537203974206543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190211635","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09192011,0.88762647,0.0009831274,0.0072348444,0.00095152704,0.000487875,0.0008455954,0.000011839154,0.009938586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043600243,0.9516287,0.002104572,0.0007031966,0.000114795126,0.000011986275,0.000017210008,0.000011331616,0.0018079592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942796,0.00083955034,0.0014299793,0.00043270664,0.0027611293,0.00025700906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873382,0.004285102,0.002168055,0.00088354247,0.0050506517,0.00027448745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03542704,0.00009925215,0.00067104946,0.004386731,0.0001171539,0.0010694272,0.0010772446,0.0000674971,0.008368932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14848453,0.00007102019,0.0001965157,0.04587862,0.00006455963,0.0009130986,0.000352937,0.00013577193,0.00018667789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024175875,0.00019645011,0.010191381,0.0005604299,0.00009151195,0.0000091604725,0.00003625988,0.000015068766,0.01438998,0.0013709075,0.51779187,0.45532283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001497425,0.000048821898,0.001418513,0.00030036087,0.000022019383,0.00001145344,0.000050287374,0.000025720125,0.007959328,0.0032602423,0.9866575,0.000096008676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009630584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009208577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46886566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056726767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080598204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194145553","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202120201948","title":"Integration of the elements involved in scientific publication","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Subject (documents); Process (computing); Publishing; Balance (ability); Computer science; Institution; Scientific publishing; Scientific literature; Data science; Political science; Operations research; Library science; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.3933854094592221,"score_gpt":0.4981382380784269,"score_spread":0.10475282861920476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194145553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879104,0.0025320298,0.0011889512,0.0039626644,0.00149942,0.000556945,0.00015450804,0.000017117252,0.0021779658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122626,0.00025410383,0.00038648403,0.0009088607,0.00008870427,0.0000304208,0.00006452023,0.000022611883,0.0070180353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98426056,0.0014200207,0.0022413232,0.0014776401,0.009436449,0.0011640103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870855,0.002501779,0.0011699778,0.0018779613,0.0068724565,0.000492275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031862747,0.00031475516,0.0005557018,0.029201703,0.00056519744,0.003972379,0.004629284,0.0010454503,0.001271618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10170857,0.0002345334,0.00036014296,0.28625226,0.00067722925,0.0015608899,0.0018449617,0.0022707235,0.00024342678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014133571,0.00028307262,0.8674936,0.000025034919,0.000020610081,0.000007535597,0.0010531957,0.000020094067,0.030931868,0.002401159,0.045002438,0.05274721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063780753,0.000045257,0.931767,0.00014156807,0.000019278585,0.0000045210954,0.0023555863,0.016647391,0.03798085,0.0013393736,0.0088170925,0.00024427313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031404063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008683874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25705054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008357702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003096084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194997003","doi":"","title":"Requesting Reprints of Scientific Publications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Library science; Developing country; Political science; Business; Accounting; Computer science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.5672636181694728,"score_gpt":0.5410988249342429,"score_spread":0.02616479323522991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194997003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390965,0.0055928654,0.016328543,0.003615678,0.0006435767,0.00015051183,0.0000059946224,0.000029946808,0.034536365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710859,0.0017448638,0.00048391722,0.000012952404,0.00007831947,0.0000020869081,7.01183e-7,0.0000071507434,0.026584111],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989916,0.00023122494,0.00084943895,0.0005033306,0.006349145,0.0021677136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922114,0.0012572717,0.00055913156,0.000855305,0.0048444844,0.0002724337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06747601,0.00009040303,0.0001929874,0.038828272,0.00060466776,0.0024678442,0.00261577,0.000062637235,0.0008192903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05772967,0.00006458543,0.00016500289,0.14773792,0.00023279675,0.0009095822,0.00030047825,0.0012500517,0.0004891212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005250898,0.00025697134,0.10414253,0.0000021582046,0.00003752991,0.0000028982465,0.00020006651,0.000033296907,0.002419501,0.21414968,0.006678289,0.6720718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047257487,0.00022679732,0.02425846,0.000017695464,0.000007990947,0.00046235416,0.0010962414,0.006483855,0.00082415686,0.9444511,0.021501483,0.00019727017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018372262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005224475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73030144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004693573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010517748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195670816","doi":"10.1002/asi.24569","title":"Measuring the citation context of national <scp>self‐references</scp>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Citation; Scholarly communication; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; History; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.3249558079521777,"score_gpt":0.46352632154575574,"score_spread":0.13857051359357803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195670816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692059,0.00030021978,0.0022651565,0.018337728,0.0012045238,0.0002750258,0.000034475248,0.000012400128,0.008364565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891984,0.0000906934,0.00047697793,0.0002587219,0.000025035879,0.000003757702,5.0737987e-7,0.0000011947133,0.00022325388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036694,0.00008498348,0.00089210854,0.00010589047,0.008336905,0.00021316965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480344,0.0043314393,0.002372103,0.00021210205,0.044988602,0.00006133491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03892127,0.000055317825,0.0001693659,0.012781986,0.00054671697,0.00092975824,0.0015887619,0.00010213465,0.0000035028954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27196726,0.000028655444,0.000087823086,0.06951667,0.00024898455,0.0026194558,0.00029409208,0.00021701527,0.00000775571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134064085,0.00015951048,0.3534548,0.000024578694,0.00012994191,4.5276497e-7,0.0056598,0.00026294077,0.010549789,0.33570513,0.04345887,0.25058076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001788276,0.00027893702,0.32213184,0.000037421738,0.000033027118,0.000084798114,0.029122896,0.0076921666,0.094082475,0.19658156,0.34806573,0.00010085909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021200424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004764243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30460685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031780716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013775697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196499916","doi":"10.1177/01655515211040655","title":"Global scientific collaboration: A social network analysis and data mining of the co-authorship networks","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Social network analysis; Data science; Library science; Cluster analysis; Network analysis; Clustering coefficient; China; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.41183068110362653,"score_gpt":0.566526376102441,"score_spread":0.15469569499881453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196499916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987514,0.00044308644,0.094242744,0.0021242667,0.0017459401,0.00009642664,0.00009198639,0.0000032462076,0.0025009415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951045,0.000031156695,0.0045707263,0.00012945486,0.00009940343,2.5797678e-7,0.0000045455013,8.4439296e-7,0.00005910027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878121,0.0002540443,0.0013230256,0.00024511732,0.010037801,0.0003278895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98259276,0.0010144436,0.0017822015,0.0007460145,0.0136270225,0.0002375413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06399049,0.00007253293,0.00028031316,0.011097641,0.0011396387,0.007632329,0.0039110873,0.00006150014,0.000061997955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0391646,0.000042976946,0.00011019939,0.41117552,0.0010626604,0.0072274776,0.0012915209,0.00015945929,0.0000033558986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038452603,0.000048797006,0.81427145,0.000006880324,0.000085407846,0.000004186441,0.0021626288,0.026612032,0.00011113904,0.0033658517,0.04337696,0.109916195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027236313,0.00003492566,0.8157849,0.000012327779,0.000054996057,0.00004102251,0.0031823106,0.1679702,0.00015626322,0.0013166363,0.011086151,0.000087920766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004310024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003898216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40007788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010470552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022738464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99339783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196835254","doi":"10.1126/sciadv.abe4639","title":"The gendered nature of authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Advances","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Devaluation; Attribution; Power (physics); Injustice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Currency; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.4917747213293212,"score_gpt":0.6104990795276162,"score_spread":0.11872435819829497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196835254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881113,0.050078496,0.0023353247,0.006685179,0.0042018057,0.00020376808,0.000024406761,0.000030327388,0.055327687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324197,0.00042924198,0.0018776396,0.000102471975,0.00004519803,0.000003181938,3.252609e-7,0.0000029104347,0.0042970446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98610336,0.00017267869,0.0004770097,0.0006975466,0.011910971,0.0006384461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869409,0.005232505,0.00025335347,0.0011015825,0.0061633443,0.0003082648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03126014,0.00008499713,0.00017102632,0.008794734,0.0009987805,0.0020255055,0.004489419,0.00007241603,0.00015036124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11915337,0.000043147873,0.000098959965,0.2412885,0.0018959144,0.0013395087,0.0008136717,0.00034342962,0.000076440505],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014252196,0.00006668554,0.038575493,0.0000044458625,0.000004619776,0.000016744618,0.00022218005,0.00009365809,0.05371723,0.040166903,0.0023402078,0.86477757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018885793,0.000080043246,0.12295411,0.000008876504,0.0000024798308,0.00001898658,0.0031825386,0.0007830209,0.33598787,0.2629015,0.27371475,0.0001769594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003684282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027687625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8646006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047356934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009891973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196838655","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.07.005","title":"Predatory Journals- The Power of the Predator Versus the Integrity of the Honest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Aside; Work (physics); Peer review; Public relations; Developing country; Power (physics); Health care; Internet privacy; Law; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6444277517032294,"score_gpt":0.5807667156400796,"score_spread":0.06366103606314977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196838655","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020533425,0.9823285,0.00006614916,0.000801665,0.012034654,0.0021398629,0.00027612338,0.0000046510895,0.00029508967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014548512,0.9848728,0.000009806581,0.00002554382,0.00018057849,0.0002281917,0.000006304761,0.000022210166,0.00010604632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826955,0.007194856,0.0030833092,0.0009527506,0.0052880994,0.0007854534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8223225,0.1655981,0.003909188,0.0050878157,0.002875856,0.00020656045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036342863,0.00044380262,0.0019545946,0.0063976953,0.0003515043,0.00047999428,0.014501245,0.00050244556,0.00043306404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37312812,0.00014132299,0.0013056827,0.083337486,0.0023152847,0.00017020533,0.004059233,0.0035844964,0.00003185064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009049688,0.00048891845,0.025329223,0.0010121391,0.00020668136,0.0000043134614,0.0005441924,0.00011801514,9.790516e-7,0.0021046821,0.05881952,0.9113623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037640304,0.00010259048,0.014007055,0.0043748864,0.00016075473,0.000062815045,0.00019299444,0.000034799956,0.0000038123367,0.0019027572,0.97858685,0.00019425029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004209917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067545094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025183702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024166768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197222642","doi":"10.1017/pls.2021.23","title":"Tie my hands loosely","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and the Life Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.6056489886481925,"score_gpt":0.5695863811963155,"score_spread":0.03606260745187695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197222642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8086431,0.012518965,0.0011994371,0.060365617,0.0010757848,0.00017242263,0.000029949992,0.000027147726,0.115967564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953,0.0007950104,0.00037381393,0.0034169168,0.00015774586,0.000003893124,5.7871085e-7,0.0000035804562,0.0057184203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927119,0.00031191474,0.00042961986,0.00056832674,0.005335973,0.00064227317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990981,0.0065500336,0.00012874484,0.0005153372,0.0013109919,0.0005138839],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020022973,0.00010649468,0.0002534542,0.0056268605,0.00115672,0.0036057918,0.0017205942,0.00005134394,0.00028856666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041878387,0.000051470426,0.000107722175,0.056391753,0.0023514999,0.00032683893,0.0008919483,0.0001617962,0.00012950013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011032771,0.00008047276,0.039274935,0.0000052924306,0.000022644368,0.000017990453,0.00054831855,0.000029034396,0.000056417244,0.89943457,0.032655522,0.027863754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015557498,0.00013017474,0.026465157,0.000008871862,0.000016029366,0.00004777012,0.0022940882,0.021982046,0.0011920322,0.73800665,0.2080612,0.0002402584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013706589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001374973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18088692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013061208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046979234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197628853","doi":"10.17821/srels/2021/v58i4/155744","title":"Newspaper Citations in Scientific Publications Indexed in Web of Science (2001-2010)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SRELS Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Web of science; Library science; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.37353395026965686,"score_gpt":0.5135139787103039,"score_spread":0.13998002844064705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197628853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88479537,0.00031897603,0.01665325,0.0063666133,0.0020113434,0.00046791116,0.00002709691,0.000008532497,0.08935092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875787,0.00020724811,0.009981169,0.00013026634,0.00001154693,0.000005876939,0.000005199855,0.0000024080266,0.0020775772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897922,0.00011944881,0.0019309844,0.00019868895,0.007559043,0.0003995986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951894,0.0005948981,0.00092138536,0.00052637735,0.008218773,0.0002196454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034728352,0.00007924358,0.00022059932,0.11752571,0.00018994507,0.0025270304,0.0018938635,0.000042342315,0.0004763212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01915871,0.00006262454,0.00008661541,0.2425735,0.00043130675,0.00633236,0.00051267596,0.0002397735,0.00011339165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005475887,0.0010984624,0.3211809,0.000082682614,0.000047594847,0.00003931029,0.0047798185,0.020183275,0.0041957377,0.1432373,0.0946601,0.41044006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013286185,0.00005927321,0.86533976,0.00006159731,0.000005466718,0.000014947462,0.0077324673,0.010062128,0.00087186845,0.010812068,0.10358478,0.0001270155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009597986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007593333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5441589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027568056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001459056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197846497","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0119","title":"Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Co-citation; Citation; Dominance (genetics); Specialty; Information science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.286229173528639,"score_gpt":0.5805644529410221,"score_spread":0.2943352794123831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197846497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435525,0.0000900696,0.05525596,0.00033382874,0.00034367476,0.00006064887,0.000023926938,0.0000024839028,0.0003369389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927154,0.00007803296,0.006985927,0.000053792384,0.00004619553,2.7309073e-7,0.000022503802,0.000002132239,0.00009574402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941135,0.00024790224,0.0012662114,0.00018773024,0.008690562,0.0001962115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480487,0.0012441255,0.0013229768,0.00027710115,0.0121106375,0.00024029642],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011691111,0.00007694072,0.0002697307,0.05218516,0.00017129457,0.0020915524,0.00090451527,0.00005553896,0.0031351333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026431123,0.00005560663,0.00015793426,0.14576642,0.00015933588,0.009190271,0.00009231918,0.00017761813,0.000041911848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003077735,0.00036057856,0.17003584,0.000026711761,0.00041752364,0.000021894082,0.018021716,0.016903922,0.33677372,0.0028433101,0.012719061,0.44156793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012561929,0.0009620355,0.68144983,0.000013350366,0.00022798136,0.000082052284,0.019313764,0.029047014,0.25018418,0.0145786805,0.002652045,0.00023290004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022348388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014784044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.511414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001724472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072565925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197930157","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011","title":"Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7459966553927573,"score_gpt":0.6835811267572081,"score_spread":0.06241552863554922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197930157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007592924,0.9920888,0.0003193317,0.00017538929,0.0020353599,0.0015007479,0.00006965825,0.00002554425,0.00370927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027128025,0.99412584,0.00073372206,0.000028075405,0.00013479215,0.0008590597,0.00007750728,0.000023443026,0.0013047489],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852941,0.0015842499,0.0034902925,0.0022877164,0.00562501,0.0017186005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98691803,0.007128559,0.0015172873,0.0014496996,0.0026336112,0.00035279023],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104438074,0.00042268293,0.0033450504,0.14983,0.00036845126,0.0007199352,0.004415868,0.00064279896,0.00017857975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08366331,0.00031859265,0.00073616806,0.41794467,0.00049042824,0.0005862087,0.0020305398,0.00092724053,0.00013357846],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000552303,0.0001269925,0.001382414,0.00422473,0.000009680996,0.000014357851,0.000010141066,0.0000044877493,2.0880469e-7,0.002064958,0.0028071636,0.98934937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021653953,0.00038702512,0.010125321,0.03431559,0.0002426925,0.00016387491,0.00029782255,0.004351934,4.7163834e-7,0.00089350133,0.94616365,0.00089269644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007199473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065505796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98845667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00616457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051730173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200026842","doi":"10.18438/eblip29913","title":"Do Institutional Repository Deposit Guidelines Deter Data Discovery?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Data element; Sample (material); Meta Data Services; Documentation; Data discovery; Data science; World Wide Web; Metadata repository; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.466706315802476,"score_gpt":0.5217880096438329,"score_spread":0.05508169384135686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200026842","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10178874,0.04110595,0.36174482,0.3896334,0.0041512917,0.0009190433,0.0004894886,0.0002650615,0.099902235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7713932,0.01157275,0.09768484,0.113521114,0.0005495968,0.000024403074,0.00040949776,0.000015130765,0.0048294906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370533,0.00044398993,0.0010227655,0.00051419885,0.0040747873,0.00023893091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841768,0.011592497,0.0004990475,0.0015908151,0.0018600888,0.0002807164],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008201976,0.0001204227,0.00015709316,0.0055031125,0.0005392444,0.016095288,0.0018058986,0.00008850852,0.00034913604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15154636,0.00008798307,0.00005004196,0.029915923,0.00012851205,0.48290467,0.0018683743,0.00024342665,0.00017931729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068007753,0.0002813024,0.074622974,0.00012424069,0.000069279624,0.00036965095,0.00015281893,0.0015865185,0.0010089815,0.16138075,0.21983895,0.53988445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025325117,0.000053307886,0.030160783,0.00010156545,0.000013976898,0.0002283538,0.00043519004,0.037257478,0.0043665664,0.00039521707,0.92657125,0.00016308812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012303627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.4854064e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017406584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011005518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907037},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3200417041","doi":"10.2147/amep.s328648","title":"A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Pairwise comparison; Likert scale; Accountability; Computer science; Rubric; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Operations research; Political science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Law","score_opus":0.4751538192648879,"score_gpt":0.6814700343754677,"score_spread":0.2063162151105798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200417041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6409573,0.06576188,0.026110595,0.18748188,0.005114164,0.000701022,0.000026694484,0.00005310341,0.07379337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116994,0.004746097,0.004745563,0.007095721,0.00010974065,0.000030003563,0.000016002412,0.000007862784,0.0020790678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897404,0.0019608198,0.00065161736,0.00075219834,0.0065081757,0.00038682087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9427758,0.04835148,0.00030824382,0.0007136607,0.0061223353,0.0017285207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045967717,0.000107578155,0.0002562829,0.010440688,0.00014300077,0.00093662506,0.0007879932,0.00012890731,0.0015810445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70768243,0.00008110971,0.00003253951,0.11534292,0.00013505958,0.0016197152,0.0002275017,0.0005194945,0.00016799195],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079304926,0.00067035377,0.086483784,0.000016984299,0.0000047251783,0.00004453001,0.00083344895,0.0000072457447,0.0000056171716,0.0030702627,0.0033880305,0.9053957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004101155,0.00010861686,0.22186103,0.000065714405,0.000007801813,0.00015715342,0.005110451,0.0042618047,0.000066469314,0.032551635,0.73514986,0.0002493685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092751296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037303718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90514636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006073184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028411897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200984547","doi":"10.1007/s11676-021-01388-8","title":"Mastering the scientific peer review process: tips for young authors from a young senior editor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Forestry Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nanjing University; Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Peer review; Publishing; Process (computing); Scientific publishing; Technical peer review; Psychology; Institution; Odds; Public relations; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.5916902377102353,"score_gpt":0.6295760095093614,"score_spread":0.03788577179912611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200984547","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003122986,0.037561543,0.00061155023,0.007848464,0.9478263,0.0012455597,0.001078489,0.000011158007,0.00069390656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001443044,0.006039566,0.0009917315,0.000023452934,0.9420632,0.00011791615,0.00016354906,0.00008744546,0.049070075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88195777,0.0019420205,0.003133899,0.0015781034,0.109491795,0.0018963873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5822538,0.084371686,0.0046236273,0.0061212857,0.32012942,0.0025001743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26709056,0.00048139822,0.0015372297,0.033537112,0.0017879799,0.020272372,0.016176566,0.0010771566,0.0008135883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6705495,0.0002676308,0.0011991239,0.11064332,0.0010157113,0.0013516499,0.0030119342,0.0070606703,0.00014318062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013388744,0.000119965334,0.0008350846,0.00047232717,0.00011039479,0.00013840212,0.00025685225,0.000006190074,0.00009409635,0.0000064142746,0.991141,0.006685367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005892459,0.00035785104,0.0002842178,0.0023897134,0.000071128954,0.000059074664,0.0015106467,0.0004483118,0.00009544131,0.0050492585,0.9888514,0.0002936663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010143097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009905331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40345892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009979454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999776},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3201111863","doi":"10.3390/su131810378","title":"Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Scopus; Institution; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Bibliometrics; Library science; Social science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.32639008186427493,"score_gpt":0.723295831982531,"score_spread":0.3969057501182561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201111863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98076195,0.0007632902,0.000021140444,0.010638372,0.000077474324,0.0003203944,0.000021937936,0.000006501538,0.007388952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977526,0.000028576082,0.000019716734,0.00005889678,0.00005241808,0.000008045959,0.0000019785978,0.0000027859621,0.002074978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891788,0.0021793512,0.00034721513,0.0007178237,0.006880741,0.00069611956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96114177,0.010742877,0.00010153635,0.00058973185,0.027261218,0.00016284383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07064912,0.000099803794,0.00019424934,0.013297918,0.0016475981,0.0051208213,0.0011839883,0.000101995174,0.00042804726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10245134,0.000055878416,0.00007150397,0.27402657,0.0011241168,0.0011669269,0.0008488218,0.00040691855,0.000012328011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006377305,0.0002040801,0.9652968,0.000019142284,0.0000041419767,0.000070545175,0.006709171,0.00010128896,0.000050137132,0.013989816,0.0016241072,0.011866988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025378985,0.00009550056,0.88070446,8.879977e-7,6.433966e-7,0.0000045804372,0.06206643,0.0013833769,0.00003740405,0.05239802,0.0029848681,0.00007001979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039187307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036542205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26072866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011016894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005767235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986917},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W320283735","doi":"","title":"The indexing of scholarly open access business journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Information retrieval; Business; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.7499084562366026,"score_gpt":0.6131474332546254,"score_spread":0.13676102298197723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320283735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93415594,0.0015376182,0.009248622,0.018457355,0.00036045542,0.00045654256,0.000031648608,0.000012726516,0.035739113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925452,0.00060741475,0.0012964901,0.00010947,0.000035402656,9.3416354e-8,7.956124e-7,0.0000034651193,0.0054016863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933024,0.00023632289,0.000413424,0.00038448197,0.005321442,0.0003419339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98900527,0.0024505688,0.00069805223,0.0007415116,0.0068510277,0.00025359844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016258389,0.000093131806,0.00033946225,0.017633917,0.0008189954,0.0075573428,0.014169206,0.00011065299,0.00047499582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013517285,0.00006818501,0.00016453162,0.13557696,0.00025498096,0.0075662774,0.0034334157,0.00031053758,0.000041531417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000197249,0.0002815752,0.12069982,0.0000060884167,0.0000475479,0.000034200977,0.00036071334,0.0001974908,0.0021993166,0.0046207886,0.023910912,0.8474443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062573014,0.00010665815,0.93387884,0.000029092198,0.000008119749,0.0000035701898,0.0014079948,0.0006663928,0.00021345256,0.022767084,0.040193703,0.000099366094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005424067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014014778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84734493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006331296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049027865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203560016","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2021.1226","title":"Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Verb; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Task (project management); Noun; Selection (genetic algorithm); Term (time); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics; History; Management","score_opus":0.2495275361380183,"score_gpt":0.527191449590111,"score_spread":0.2776639134520927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203560016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18452433,0.091540836,0.0003840942,0.7048164,0.0033923495,0.0008495793,0.00007671487,0.0000321407,0.014383538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4839753,0.113876514,0.0019599444,0.16290963,0.0024754864,0.00002394225,0.000011331549,0.000101866164,0.23466599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96493703,0.003538529,0.0017580659,0.00027263467,0.029048322,0.000445445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97283775,0.018698916,0.0019343115,0.0009154313,0.004469563,0.0011440114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05776809,0.00011661738,0.0007683906,0.005406826,0.000265563,0.0020057908,0.0036124662,0.00016962206,0.006296267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3421055,0.000059381735,0.0005562111,0.07886777,0.000057210727,0.0014593666,0.0013250986,0.0012093892,0.0004503342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023236753,0.00038324096,0.12405315,0.008890792,0.00034405856,0.00043043762,0.0005238198,0.000008009737,0.00010467379,0.0015524274,0.85806257,0.0056235637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077435374,0.0013101291,0.14734529,0.21112938,0.0010118092,0.0028254152,0.0051101805,0.010984972,0.022404302,0.10144183,0.4869361,0.0017570696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037761647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5405648e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54190683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021397679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026985114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204012633","doi":"10.1002/leap.1422","title":"Expanding <scp><i>Nature</i></scp>: <scp>Product line</scp> and brand extensions of a scientific journal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Publishing; Product (mathematics); Brand extension; Advertising; Field (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Brand management; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.3334280815092882,"score_gpt":0.48473359850106196,"score_spread":0.15130551699177375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204012633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96560603,0.0146846855,0.0015297993,0.0028001973,0.0031960027,0.00017911226,0.00003492258,0.00004351213,0.011925747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977328,0.0007937404,0.0036094217,0.00034936256,0.00062058493,0.000004112157,0.000018783378,0.000033864835,0.017242122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837725,0.00083855615,0.0013096709,0.0017095295,0.011043412,0.001326317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94938445,0.030680286,0.0012398318,0.0020639328,0.014929039,0.0017024666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05089387,0.00029156494,0.0006762861,0.035576534,0.0016963816,0.05924099,0.0028695026,0.00039536925,0.00013690899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5747843,0.00022208362,0.0003123235,0.14592518,0.0005436834,0.007553406,0.0021712638,0.0026199888,0.000051796327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010978616,0.00053579756,0.15279084,0.00007558132,0.00014196758,0.0004522416,0.0043330393,0.0003809957,0.10330029,0.0029457605,0.5316072,0.20342532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034023786,0.00030939587,0.12526122,0.00030609337,0.0000855859,0.001616551,0.028220903,0.0053356853,0.09821918,0.06091989,0.6760149,0.00030824318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035493216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002754799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52389044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009950606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204025275","doi":"10.5539/ass.v17n10p63","title":"Announcement of Retraction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Political science; Management; Business; Computer science; Economics; Library science","score_opus":0.5017406114427908,"score_gpt":0.5929002190179083,"score_spread":0.09115960757511754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204025275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103585355,0.00012325696,0.0028721371,0.0042105815,0.0012302137,0.00008860916,0.000016938215,0.00001357494,0.88785934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970814,0.000024183226,0.00070054806,0.000084935964,0.00010113505,0.0000016430077,8.2026685e-7,0.000002150515,0.0020032036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98706096,0.00010432358,0.00040398558,0.00052337605,0.011495008,0.00041232267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939245,0.00037636535,0.00020228342,0.00036455394,0.004936089,0.00019618303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017355395,0.00005903663,0.00015994674,0.009817816,0.0005364768,0.0010102912,0.0015160646,0.00006469078,0.0006887286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021091036,0.00004604906,0.000088951914,0.231844,0.00075294665,0.0007776757,0.0004684904,0.00014718871,0.00012602244],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041935264,0.00011003356,0.009022436,0.0000016316643,0.00000261869,0.000010233968,0.0005269044,3.741004e-7,0.054129414,0.028903732,0.007810437,0.899478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019671036,0.00007335868,0.8323305,0.0000036877548,0.000002696913,0.000006850948,0.0043157223,0.00011370786,0.04085355,0.020304747,0.10166521,0.00013322185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002238895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064671494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89934474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015129782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008498107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871547},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3204582724","doi":"10.1038/s42254-021-00379-2","title":"The spectrum of early career physics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Reviews Physics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Spectrum (functional analysis); Physics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.7098016814886061,"score_gpt":0.6283497836085045,"score_spread":0.08145189788010165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204582724","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010598382,0.99281675,0.0006830865,0.000072986906,0.0014609211,0.0012941756,0.00015303247,0.000013929383,0.003504037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000011158494,0.9957846,0.00027535768,0.000049859387,0.0013163056,0.0000709439,0.000042575546,0.000058855436,0.0023903688],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820843,0.0018212688,0.002617212,0.0013718081,0.011153664,0.0009517649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796214,0.010416688,0.0026378445,0.0037472865,0.003236155,0.00034060577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021598328,0.00069689465,0.0047318335,0.004866234,0.00039135365,0.0022719551,0.0074867075,0.00088222785,0.000085228006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024118949,0.00032919546,0.0036103853,0.21371953,0.00033554758,0.00034743702,0.001703319,0.0034399938,0.0007112105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8648907e-7,0.00006232599,0.000017749977,0.0012207363,0.000078442536,0.0000056980966,0.000012494912,2.7766555e-7,1.5666781e-7,0.010317847,0.028422404,0.9598611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006171261,0.000051962394,0.000010556598,0.0029688766,0.00021632564,0.0000057908355,0.000007642357,0.000008119447,0.000006190313,0.007072222,0.9892473,0.00034330445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012010219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000391402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9608249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020642694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012062483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204700156","doi":"10.5539/hes.v11n4p40","title":"Requirements for Productivity in the Academic Environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Productivity; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Marketing; Function (biology); Business; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8597340110017595,"score_gpt":0.676593039024524,"score_spread":0.18314097197723556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204700156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.918472,0.026623607,0.00017436329,0.048758585,0.0027821644,0.00051229424,0.000009243188,0.0000073455917,0.0026603858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969725,0.0012028585,0.0006201299,0.00077616033,0.00027999136,0.00030889883,0.000003501481,0.000004323181,0.027079098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572587,0.0002517927,0.00037546435,0.0005047269,0.00288195,0.00026018312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953938,0.0026227324,0.00012359733,0.00053255726,0.0012764721,0.00005085696],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010827992,0.000078541896,0.00015988668,0.004510935,0.00020676322,0.00027913402,0.00070041756,0.000038567243,0.00017417202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006080797,0.000045207336,0.00005552097,0.031184798,0.0001025868,0.0002703747,0.00026041598,0.00014139165,0.00011791403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018346007,0.0010301564,0.35374522,0.000026636006,0.000052372394,0.0000021935773,0.0021567743,0.000020768559,0.0015140007,0.01820815,0.5093203,0.113905065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011163743,0.000019314415,0.42736933,0.0000043911587,0.000003855221,9.202695e-7,0.0038452786,0.0000034713937,0.0004357655,0.021088865,0.54706293,0.00005427237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055670967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032894766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113850795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014182257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020275635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98940784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204757706","doi":"10.47622/9782954099477_1","title":"Transformer l’excellence en recherche Robert Tijssen, Matthew L. Wallace et Robert McLean","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"African Minds and par Halfa eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Management; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5334396614989456,"score_gpt":0.52021813400455,"score_spread":0.013221527494395646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204757706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015285391,0.01610899,0.0035213782,0.010695708,0.0013059907,0.0011843749,0.00037728905,0.000052572548,0.9514683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10093593,0.008575567,0.008197245,0.0009812029,0.00039492155,0.00007659234,0.0000682376,0.00014736736,0.8806229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815812,0.0033694005,0.0019752139,0.0029731006,0.007876795,0.002224274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724644,0.020696217,0.0006282589,0.0018784617,0.0024265014,0.0019061873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036209792,0.001182472,0.0018301681,0.019951483,0.00085752475,0.0039829193,0.0038056776,0.0020044453,0.004434159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082522025,0.0009632246,0.0008225784,0.02651757,0.0013056257,0.00043140686,0.0011215776,0.0032597613,0.00084712484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099807985,0.00026042009,0.0010727646,0.00021261034,0.0002500579,0.00046353924,0.0063474947,0.0000075502385,0.0014844697,0.011781128,0.029537858,0.9484823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008306467,0.0005763503,0.0008185997,0.00045546223,0.00014995191,0.00023844521,0.0019451821,0.0006809945,0.0021783293,0.013319637,0.9774797,0.001326708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022652443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011552555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94794184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000990227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038685729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205355219","doi":"10.1002/pra2.525","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Annual Meeting Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Information science; Library science; Social media; China; Point (geometry); Bibliometrics; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07438405260671334,"score_gpt":0.40906504944345917,"score_spread":0.33468099683674585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205355219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98476994,0.000064915796,0.000044876415,0.009057186,0.00026377814,0.00087493204,0.00015836708,0.00002606706,0.004739936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899125,0.0000795382,0.00058716943,0.00009830061,0.000008433911,0.00005481487,0.0000010610073,0.000002860845,0.00017658701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98963743,0.000009519429,0.0013047741,0.00033768907,0.008177924,0.00053267484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018159,0.0012174665,0.004821217,0.00027505343,0.091797404,0.00007299715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038029086,0.00013086508,0.0004150432,0.23436506,0.0012221227,0.0012495962,0.0031255207,0.00030034193,0.0000014179778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.332826,0.00007514678,0.00014838103,0.8140534,0.0012753636,0.0078083393,0.0018592584,0.00024114473,8.3889256e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009415572,0.00003236098,0.8624244,0.000057519523,0.00006561949,1.682611e-9,0.0009182705,0.000009099489,0.018188844,0.088201515,0.0013083371,0.02878467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008822274,0.00015979506,0.6746544,0.00005028066,0.00021790709,0.0000037920963,0.015311471,0.009583443,0.26153985,0.016811583,0.02058895,0.00019630554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013684184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004347006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5796884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061735883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008739836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205946365","doi":"10.1080/00036846.2021.1976388","title":"Historical roots and influential publications in the area of innovation in the creative industries: A cited-references analysis using the Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Regional science; Social science; Sociology; Library science; History; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5234339764198489,"score_gpt":0.48641400702945736,"score_spread":0.03701996939039154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205946365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98549664,0.00007560182,0.0017919503,0.0037629167,0.00002841124,0.00023170102,0.000020123174,0.0000029939831,0.008589683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991394,0.000107000174,0.00040162454,0.00018870395,0.000022774782,0.000041830444,0.000029364413,0.0000026735627,0.000066572036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736893,0.00021657019,0.00088201807,0.00041229196,0.00090971496,0.00021047838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492663,0.0025593736,0.00051991106,0.00073615636,0.0012243096,0.000033611686],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011010339,0.00008962745,0.00023732263,0.014241059,0.00017143965,0.0014199647,0.0012927618,0.00009877092,0.00010214357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007824195,0.00004727781,0.00003408664,0.1675831,0.00014931372,0.00035423168,0.00020382646,0.00032849773,0.000003830332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029760586,0.00026758946,0.6945557,0.000002842498,0.00007905122,4.127164e-7,0.003513505,0.001243285,0.0006740306,0.27856836,0.0029206348,0.018144801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508511,0.000022409624,0.9592099,0.000001797684,0.000029549348,0.0000014661113,0.009945862,0.004364921,0.00042761193,0.016460024,0.009188685,0.00009687761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004508691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006895552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26465422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024200941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003738473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206436161","doi":"","title":"The research enterprise at Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College","funders":"","keywords":"Chiropractic; Library science; Web of science; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.6755944260562935,"score_gpt":0.5529896964344321,"score_spread":0.12260472962186142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206436161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59980613,0.0038769352,0.000019904555,0.049426954,0.008270015,0.0014215722,0.00017568356,0.000027606602,0.3369752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007393,0.00044597316,0.000044065244,0.00020620514,0.00045512547,0.0003916413,0.0000031204868,0.000011833317,0.09770275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829071,0.0011341373,0.0005295622,0.000778927,0.01278975,0.0018604842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748277,0.015733717,0.00011368952,0.0015291102,0.0059431307,0.0018526668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06529969,0.00010972345,0.0001963697,0.023642827,0.0022760045,0.004739544,0.0029179715,0.000115279174,0.0008463927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21906884,0.000065340144,0.00013857328,0.1801498,0.00031979184,0.0003636043,0.0014851658,0.0005616363,0.0013752332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007026874,0.000071433205,0.022625618,0.0000015762696,0.00002764072,0.00052130054,0.00008128139,0.0000029196017,0.00003739759,0.0034590617,0.57009524,0.40300626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023153644,0.000010731661,0.25782615,6.4097287e-7,0.000001708317,0.000032585773,0.0003215921,0.0000972233,0.0003160308,0.0036751954,0.73741573,0.00007087911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009809677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08891548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40293536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010427729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018676408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206699948","doi":"10.1126/science.aaa7008","title":"Eureka! <b>Flight from Wonder</b> An Investigation of Scientific Creativity <i>Albert Rothenberg</i> Oxford University Press, 2015. 221 pp. <b>The Creativity Crisis</b> Reinventing Science to Unleash Possibility <i>Roberta B. Ness</i> Oxford University Press, 2015. 287 pp.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Wonder; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2394583296694348,"score_gpt":0.42418220003977525,"score_spread":0.18472387037034044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206699948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98300785,0.0004930025,0.0029441952,0.0029163081,0.0013690905,0.0013058273,0.00034404878,0.00010369509,0.0075160097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897066,0.00017309962,0.0035478931,0.00017712759,0.00010433953,0.0000047019034,0.000016150529,0.00002337678,0.006246721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751533,0.0015661794,0.0010812274,0.0038732234,0.01643294,0.0018931137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758711,0.0031411333,0.0012462204,0.0047344365,0.011896109,0.0031109916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059775095,0.00054416305,0.000804462,0.008736488,0.0038590583,0.005478222,0.014256457,0.00023087487,0.00008813152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026452582,0.00041776375,0.00026804756,0.14995737,0.010883102,0.010951911,0.0057348222,0.00070440106,0.000033290587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005769995,0.0010754997,0.81275004,0.000039373226,0.000037430273,0.000041393854,0.0049568694,0.0017360967,0.04732929,0.008882853,0.11450031,0.008073834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019637235,0.00068070216,0.45804077,0.000121461235,0.00011086352,0.000010974753,0.009545453,0.031271014,0.06722504,0.010893769,0.41863924,0.0014969923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010415949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001367142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3547093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011094991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005435775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206744719","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0103","title":"Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McMaster University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Accountability; Currency; Public relations; Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7432291543368634,"score_gpt":0.5939616039626232,"score_spread":0.14926755037424022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206744719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987208,0.0020781877,0.004187122,0.0025630048,0.0003476579,0.00018966068,0.00002911269,0.000018822648,0.0033784239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971776,0.00012731561,0.0010991876,0.00022215681,0.0000687915,0.000013752233,0.0000050861904,0.000008574311,0.0012775138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499273,0.00027813468,0.00051729963,0.00066119595,0.0029365034,0.00061410596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99008954,0.008141758,0.00013596936,0.0003129421,0.0010160112,0.00030380243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02686975,0.00010668367,0.00026357104,0.017594095,0.00020778608,0.009914516,0.00096755545,0.00023884299,0.00008035573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109946385,0.00008877343,0.00005946859,0.05549408,0.00006817945,0.0029283117,0.0006273242,0.00073404866,0.000016785614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055518587,0.00009167577,0.6048784,0.00006119415,0.000025944353,0.00011357481,0.009357898,0.0002874529,0.041029707,0.06011705,0.02338101,0.26060057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016679283,0.000078360565,0.65907675,0.00007842321,0.000005556999,0.000029949051,0.014263523,0.018915541,0.005057701,0.20360273,0.0968104,0.00041313065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007113302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070348884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26018745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074053925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030226939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99354064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207415295","doi":"10.3998/jep.153","title":"What Are the Characteristics of Canadian Independent, Scholarly Journals? Results from a Website Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electronic Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Subject (documents); Dominance (genetics); Impact factor; Library science; Portrait; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; History; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.3340776664748603,"score_gpt":0.4676257342216869,"score_spread":0.1335480677468266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207415295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509031,0.01427756,0.00079358235,0.031501412,0.0011633593,0.00006219384,0.00020963626,0.0000029599223,0.0010861588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265563,0.005564491,0.00015448341,0.0005188572,0.00041444245,4.969462e-7,0.0000148510635,0.000010205014,0.000666564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98389536,0.00090104295,0.0023418742,0.0004605058,0.011429069,0.0009721667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673424,0.006084518,0.0038792642,0.0010383298,0.020707455,0.0009480558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06081258,0.0001642563,0.00076972897,0.087718345,0.0003922152,0.07301099,0.0048049367,0.00022045901,0.0005694271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19081704,0.0001006745,0.0006693539,0.25249958,0.00007819905,0.021791888,0.00044561975,0.0026481438,0.000013884824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030329448,0.00033309672,0.78930014,0.0000054203683,0.0034627155,0.0009936349,0.0018069135,0.000581719,0.0037986052,0.0010461686,0.05235974,0.14600854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009775868,0.00012356383,0.90538985,0.00009069018,0.00028350714,0.00014886915,0.0064776023,0.0014871891,0.0006618229,0.008467107,0.07570351,0.00018872991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011729812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07482751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16478124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006868931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052232575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207707709","doi":"10.1002/ece3.8154","title":"Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Metadata; Information retrieval; Consistency (knowledge bases); Search engine; Scopus; World Wide Web; Transparency (behavior); Scientific literature; Data science; Systematic review; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.49750914401219093,"score_gpt":0.5504804170143308,"score_spread":0.052971273002139885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207707709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957086,0.0022395055,0.0004028554,0.00061426737,0.00020532905,0.000076208315,0.000019237741,0.0000032720127,0.00073076505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863845,0.00003225195,0.00038862415,0.000008534538,0.0000105489635,0.0000038101796,0.00001231104,7.027728e-7,0.00090475864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964836,0.0006775884,0.0004079696,0.00082217105,0.0013585456,0.0002500957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949642,0.0019519945,0.0001050493,0.00056564604,0.0023180426,0.000095099254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021990173,0.000056607736,0.00030728485,0.026151184,0.00015902042,0.0003873541,0.00031246396,0.000094084404,0.00014241754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019143373,0.000043110773,0.00008537227,0.21224695,0.00045724277,0.0002887854,0.00029967856,0.00017591346,0.000023535014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017619896,0.00015608517,0.99411094,0.000003869065,0.000027230455,0.000006160616,0.00046897636,0.00013359466,0.0017896622,0.0019335618,0.0003677601,0.0009845498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014401785,0.000038681694,0.9697891,0.0000021930834,0.0000104086,0.0000025212723,0.00042180755,0.007494073,0.001028445,0.020841561,0.00018675083,0.000040428935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037363978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011595789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18609577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081066195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023641453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207753986","doi":"10.1093/jas/skab235.135","title":"140 Past and Future Changes in Scientific Publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Dissemination; Public relations; Political science; Scientific progress; Best practice; Scientific literature; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Library science; Computer science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.448412155490907,"score_gpt":0.5313907046262382,"score_spread":0.08297854913533115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207753986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97596085,0.0020229514,0.000059307426,0.018456012,0.0012885333,0.000037296384,0.0000036733563,0.0000025329448,0.0021688482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971765,0.00028839236,0.0016632375,0.00015667027,0.0004752214,3.2442566e-7,1.2028825e-7,0.0000029364023,0.000236577],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872547,0.00013755355,0.00059814914,0.0005530398,0.010885167,0.00057139836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905489,0.0009553221,0.00041749858,0.00032466796,0.0071674744,0.0005861491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054173604,0.00008788603,0.00025435057,0.03915925,0.00044974854,0.021933025,0.002535583,0.00006379864,0.00022923097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032129895,0.00005667201,0.000063173,0.22157155,0.0007910316,0.0051496653,0.000971742,0.00044857134,0.000009587407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005372038,0.00017040709,0.23925436,0.0000059723448,0.000003694671,0.00044824442,0.0009172667,0.0000062112395,0.43646434,0.0026016654,0.0102510275,0.3098231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040406882,0.00036910217,0.8800294,0.000024880495,0.000002329587,0.0003882184,0.0039526215,0.0008176555,0.011548592,0.0033046782,0.09902548,0.00013298665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000935069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007724662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013188958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010534276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207822332","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.03","title":"Author Choice of Journal Type Based on Income Level of Country","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Waiver; Scopus; Publishing; Sample (material); Economics; Business; Political science; Public economics; Advertising; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7512362361493289,"score_gpt":0.5689153115632962,"score_spread":0.18232092458603266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207822332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695775,0.0026217934,0.008289029,0.010283118,0.003665502,0.000072925686,0.00008366011,0.000004424612,0.0054020304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885689,0.00008253098,0.009349552,0.0004075302,0.00042804106,1.8322338e-7,0.000001403475,0.000014059303,0.0011477853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753995,0.0007632271,0.0023327423,0.0003080217,0.02074948,0.0004470077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92879826,0.008997973,0.003162659,0.00067456294,0.05760004,0.0007664786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08100941,0.0001486305,0.0006584269,0.04606861,0.00023337857,0.04440401,0.0042016,0.00026866025,0.00072744995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48447213,0.00010156652,0.00035044155,0.12010884,0.00011690918,0.036031693,0.0004951271,0.0028869738,0.0000110102055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027523146,0.0007600409,0.82619774,0.0000440564,0.00012931449,0.00032241116,0.00019232079,0.0014207644,0.018504024,0.001735924,0.08284865,0.06756953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024016527,0.0011720578,0.8947114,0.00039159952,0.000039050447,0.00033764562,0.0011068064,0.0025630458,0.008289908,0.0076889563,0.081057765,0.00024011584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004372215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010003251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4034627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003073632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209040456","doi":"10.1080/14703297.2021.1997784","title":"Why is the proposal alone not sufficient for grant success? Building research fundability through collaborative research networking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovations in Education and Teaching International","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Funding Agency; Sociology; Work (physics); Experiential learning; Principal (computer security); Political science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.6178911184170436,"score_gpt":0.6523647550410882,"score_spread":0.03447363662404457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209040456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7884961,0.00061018596,0.018427052,0.17948268,0.0034589404,0.0009726205,0.00008850657,0.000018293771,0.008445661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829332,0.000101091144,0.012966602,0.0016282635,0.0005605523,0.0002770969,0.00004741295,0.000012140757,0.0014736274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941755,0.0015953907,0.0009268656,0.00092771504,0.0065397844,0.00059270405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599502,0.014810654,0.00021602007,0.0006801122,0.024241257,0.00010173676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.067901686,0.00012547852,0.0001914209,0.014184835,0.0020249155,0.004200386,0.0015421967,0.000106916516,0.00017700755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06722102,0.000090430825,0.00005765221,0.06544023,0.0005436038,0.0008105323,0.0007591614,0.0013055862,0.000012014016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005200593,0.0012537403,0.08968833,0.000011738526,0.000030496145,0.0000019007093,0.0076798485,0.00011083635,0.001144625,0.66665804,0.13601162,0.097356826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044327552,0.000072406234,0.049012646,0.000061704675,0.0000022631082,0.000011933058,0.017031578,0.0113186,0.0013840727,0.15225196,0.76825356,0.00015596667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007028055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039106444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63224196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005619603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023195872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209486148","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3821955","title":"Cooperative Non-APC Publishing Models: Canada, Europe and Latin America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Publishing; Political science; Geography; History; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4031000725801777,"score_gpt":0.3970653542631745,"score_spread":0.006034718317003196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209486148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12853575,0.00075624953,0.09714807,0.05731982,0.00039080236,0.001370506,0.0015565441,0.00066070096,0.71226156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953869,0.00019552925,0.0005215824,0.001846909,0.0001374119,3.9362718e-8,0.00021280926,0.00043911688,0.0012597187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934069,0.0005836937,0.00047876206,0.00086868356,0.0040945495,0.00056741247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922179,0.0004497363,0.00018738085,0.00050330965,0.005705396,0.00093628786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042402633,0.00016057238,0.00025259616,0.004130462,0.0022060175,0.01544854,0.0032063832,0.00005852613,0.005985209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045035057,0.00013448215,0.000037658523,0.053225655,0.00023508139,0.0017570884,0.0040421854,0.0005131779,0.0017246415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003550569,0.00003831067,0.000046737856,0.00000939365,0.000017684933,0.000030954197,0.0011953096,0.0007193585,0.00087916036,0.0016242997,0.75812286,0.2372804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034856735,0.00021333777,0.0018695768,0.0000055834794,0.0000032868163,0.000013736207,0.0010064855,0.074909076,0.00013025847,0.00021223255,0.92111707,0.00017080343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006540369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012636793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86685115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014094233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061439416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210250846","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006982","title":"Where there is no local author: a network bibliometric analysis of authorship parasitism among research conducted in sub-Saharan Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Demography; Logistic regression; Geography; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.5922082235936061,"score_gpt":0.6276499925007252,"score_spread":0.03544176890711903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210250846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979542,0.0785949,0.0034784481,0.0055054897,0.00081888423,0.0011944168,0.0007905346,0.000050601,0.011612475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98982304,0.0073982817,0.00085541053,0.00019573215,0.00012967337,0.000042857264,0.000038496502,0.00001901306,0.0014974659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96902186,0.0055550234,0.0026517643,0.0018403536,0.018208724,0.0027222682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768061,0.0077828956,0.00080943457,0.0020684004,0.010730913,0.0018022571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09131272,0.0003279455,0.0015749708,0.45631683,0.00050554675,0.0016199686,0.002908548,0.0005016345,0.0019843734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02902767,0.0002671863,0.0005452125,0.96836704,0.00069067744,0.000562663,0.0011990858,0.0011375914,0.0005473038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008631348,0.00036894676,0.5354359,0.00004873615,0.0001652405,0.00018855977,0.00014327961,0.0006081827,0.000014999908,0.0007242699,0.34509176,0.11712382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057028735,0.0003137683,0.94119084,0.00011159439,0.000029617358,0.0000089151645,0.00041584534,0.026428664,0.000032640757,0.0060578072,0.024588276,0.00025174374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058455295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072523826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5120502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012306554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038121147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211057370","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0257340","title":"How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.8976549043358827,"score_gpt":0.6462692179259985,"score_spread":0.25138568640988423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211057370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894054,0.006133265,0.00023002177,0.0028063015,0.00002766714,0.00010089889,0.0001629912,0.000008461814,0.0011249991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200636,0.00205673,0.0018289514,0.000036544065,0.000055042237,0.0000025276731,0.0000050234758,0.0000065328704,0.0040023127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989491,0.00030407443,0.000614417,0.00044897746,0.008748174,0.00039335704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074525,0.0033317762,0.00036544117,0.0005067392,0.0045532854,0.0004975365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011958496,0.00010901868,0.00047420635,0.01432145,0.00010238851,0.0014726543,0.00093521795,0.00013362514,0.0005932258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11532228,0.00007053233,0.0001454182,0.079887055,0.0001368896,0.0005797379,0.00074695924,0.00041438593,0.000031902997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014892844,0.00045184378,0.8419805,0.000018972903,0.00010972249,0.000009917172,0.00007388297,0.0000040811497,0.13474493,0.00017713389,0.0039086626,0.018505422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040296395,0.00014417178,0.9449335,0.000047778667,0.000018268523,0.0000084519,0.00015946223,0.00046481597,0.04546832,0.008025487,0.00021041767,0.00011639009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058451467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008112915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10336378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043494732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030699585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213872850","doi":"10.22541/au.163256404.42523919/v1","title":"Can I Afford to Publish? A Dilemma for African Scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"Bahir Dar University; National Research Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Dilemma; Open access publishing; Payment; Open access journal; Business model; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Advertising; Law; Marketing; Finance; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.698715707931167,"score_gpt":0.5942933009786275,"score_spread":0.10442240695253946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213872850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7693074,0.0007703306,0.0895227,0.058247775,0.0069808485,0.0038760586,0.0014337876,0.00019384702,0.069667265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381805,0.000057386827,0.0364185,0.0012997986,0.00032051222,0.00044024395,0.00009263869,0.000043054537,0.023147346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801691,0.00027059336,0.0012603743,0.00262038,0.0143289855,0.0013505198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734638,0.005502645,0.000386411,0.0029258537,0.015905771,0.0018155449],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032971874,0.00039936893,0.0008973165,0.11717789,0.0003611327,0.044392284,0.008761799,0.00049713044,0.002592154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1902339,0.00028760513,0.0006918447,0.23916149,0.000103578655,0.00078395056,0.011660835,0.0007525945,0.00018667377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007676854,0.0003721347,0.015056555,0.000053351425,0.00011232773,0.000044259854,0.00049946166,0.00049629336,0.00038367466,0.0057779085,0.5595878,0.41753948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007227374,0.00047247563,0.025334444,0.00005734822,0.000026204683,0.000008887616,0.00359783,0.005411284,0.0018208524,0.043814797,0.9175163,0.0012168325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013098891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013011553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41632262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042457535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020302336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213994457","doi":"10.54590/pop.2021.010","title":"Beyond the Grey Zone: Organization Research Publishing and Bibliodiversity in the Research Communication System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Government (linguistics); Terminology; Grey literature; Sociology; Commons; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.9020949079957455,"score_gpt":0.6369403121597293,"score_spread":0.2651545958360162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213994457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8770539,0.0022133642,0.00010072179,0.07860722,0.00024046692,0.0010296473,0.000029073439,0.000023031116,0.040702574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978918,0.00034354758,0.00011319411,0.00044407483,0.00006406745,0.00009098557,0.000023960802,0.000013011748,0.0010153466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626011,0.018465808,0.00090215413,0.0010622271,0.015567977,0.0014006951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307594,0.03258162,0.0003013134,0.004421914,0.03126908,0.0006666974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30333883,0.00013208573,0.0002868182,0.03700771,0.0037450956,0.068957895,0.0118338065,0.0001825715,0.0005610009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17031635,0.00007648842,0.000043957298,0.41105855,0.0010192682,0.006634966,0.011706457,0.001773831,0.00037427476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013770562,0.00029275767,0.6237173,0.000016190368,0.000018001103,0.000039091003,0.004230556,0.0000064077276,0.00009512447,0.11412697,0.23862271,0.018821107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008028743,0.00007936801,0.7946336,0.000031400115,0.0000073066612,0.000037376754,0.08697889,0.0030699247,0.00023308753,0.012679524,0.10123985,0.00020677247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002380108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016256479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37405083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003888359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013785763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213999030","doi":"10.54590/pop.2020.010","title":"Where Lie the Similarities and Differences?: A Comparison of University and Industry Partners in Collaboration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Promotion (chess); Foundation (evidence); Public relations; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.8266417858905243,"score_gpt":0.6009712977385953,"score_spread":0.22567048815192903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213999030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97738993,0.0008556594,0.000032623364,0.019035416,0.000048743714,0.00027840436,0.000028718048,0.000005916908,0.0023245898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993479,0.0001005683,0.00004603608,0.00023658565,0.000013303448,0.000005470353,9.964893e-7,0.0000033925992,0.00024572096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965603,0.00068059575,0.00040963897,0.00039396706,0.0016537824,0.00030176752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648756,0.0020191397,0.00020585746,0.00027129424,0.0006349182,0.00038123853],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007068035,0.00009016015,0.00030839187,0.0029584023,0.00020928384,0.0019382348,0.001302948,0.00012907667,0.00024100335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009518408,0.000060829992,0.000019438445,0.035401795,0.00046067472,0.0010163857,0.0012505545,0.0003372833,0.0000067548685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034843164,0.00006413237,0.9787812,0.0000100023235,0.000008052736,0.000002294725,0.00209165,0.000005799202,0.000045591667,0.004617642,0.00811544,0.006223316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062764686,0.00016398239,0.92557275,0.000011049913,0.000007280511,4.0624667e-7,0.033132836,0.014905933,0.000091177404,0.00084358524,0.024524158,0.00011921742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022320039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007166889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05320851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035068748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035291302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214611157","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0100","title":"Self-promotion and the need to be first in science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Scholarship; Hubris; Humility; Promotion (chess); Subject (documents); Perception; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; History; Library science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.4928738921490908,"score_gpt":0.54328017512846,"score_spread":0.05040628297936928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214611157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575842,0.00030666013,0.00033482374,0.03664142,0.0002773978,0.00020781133,0.000003828332,0.000011273024,0.0046325875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756575,0.0000953948,0.0010535171,0.00044757352,0.000017059398,0.000008943482,3.3185648e-7,0.000002472053,0.00080898736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385285,0.00012877598,0.0002633269,0.00052036316,0.0048625125,0.00037217478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640965,0.0016895687,0.000046334488,0.0004988493,0.0011153661,0.00024021296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020876188,0.000059757887,0.00014357342,0.017720321,0.00027593586,0.0024240126,0.0012049974,0.000034119952,0.00015251065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038336873,0.00003497639,0.000030889492,0.21311724,0.00026154701,0.00037764033,0.0010502479,0.00012695786,0.00014550777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011948321,0.0009105027,0.53561103,0.000020875777,0.000019745727,0.00020029496,0.01758235,0.00047761886,0.010403212,0.034113463,0.04515705,0.3553844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013728999,0.000077499106,0.88222146,0.000007672305,0.000001902878,0.000018265137,0.0011057673,0.013770373,0.0036960733,0.0062177284,0.09136704,0.00014332453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053520427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020411059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35524106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071579285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020954029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215759634","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3001133","title":"A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Index (typography); Editorial board; Publication bias; Bibliometrics; Sample (material); Library science; Impact factor; Biology; Sample size determination; MEDLINE; Statistics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7609695499606459,"score_gpt":0.6070434092038378,"score_spread":0.1539261407568081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215759634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98714405,0.0010319672,0.0014689425,0.0003534627,0.009516202,0.00012049339,0.0002662689,0.000006519935,0.00009210206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967148,0.00015020843,0.0010526207,0.000059168313,0.001861232,0.000008615455,0.000010672963,0.000005469033,0.00013722442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442804,0.00093062624,0.0006987006,0.00054480304,0.00299036,0.00040744588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98319584,0.01130965,0.0001833014,0.00041764166,0.004334889,0.00055870373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668971,0.00009298302,0.00041782847,0.01699622,0.00008709665,0.00037282184,0.0008401176,0.00021185882,0.0006996528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25296664,0.00006169579,0.00005950779,0.07430233,0.00024648613,0.00006998763,0.0007834011,0.00022004163,0.00009759318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004349258,0.0002528445,0.67464375,0.0000040389373,0.000028029834,0.00004872416,0.000033712982,3.1271304e-7,0.11821417,0.000034456247,0.037849933,0.16884656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040086432,0.00061576604,0.96952885,0.000007899135,0.000011451455,0.00002478123,0.00002966516,0.00011198555,0.007813604,0.001218103,0.020119155,0.00011785398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025357213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012517416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29488516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026358122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003368209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217143876","doi":"10.29173/jchla29579","title":"Canadian Academics’ use of predatory journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Université de Montréal; Brock University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Concordia University; York University; University of Regina; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.1508158728773931,"score_gpt":0.43490553393300224,"score_spread":0.2840896610556092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217143876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7403856,0.098285384,0.00058493996,0.14999408,0.0059220563,0.0004368661,0.0020987417,0.00001582812,0.0022765151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94609815,0.026102707,0.0024641873,0.02021911,0.0014552135,0.0000021473477,0.000006178327,0.000043255972,0.0036090375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98049736,0.006621577,0.0027062285,0.00027708473,0.008018458,0.0018793162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580576,0.017167257,0.007844545,0.00046756654,0.011610973,0.004852076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059562147,0.00024517157,0.0008232822,0.0094031505,0.0015316497,0.007728093,0.0023057982,0.00075957685,0.00089090754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21515678,0.0001948212,0.0005006691,0.021080839,0.00007188524,0.002533033,0.00015821555,0.002806452,0.000002966147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000833447,0.000016684673,0.52051765,0.0000069657517,0.00013392496,0.00012373048,0.000446297,0.0004075923,0.00002825853,0.0002883951,0.4762574,0.0017647544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039096925,0.00004490928,0.44448513,0.00007825939,0.00002754716,0.000664313,0.0005540432,0.00041579406,0.00023113197,0.005389861,0.547563,0.0001550313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7990711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9604957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20571257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060691293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2206268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217700596","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0117","title":"Versioning boundary objects: the citation profile of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Object (grammar); Originality; Software versioning; Boundary object; Citation; Boundary (topology); Data science; Discipline; Information retrieval; Scheme (mathematics); Mental mapping; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Mathematics; Software","score_opus":0.18428457107534696,"score_gpt":0.5296834151563714,"score_spread":0.34539884408102445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217700596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767692,0.0009119154,0.01736591,0.0035289119,0.0007985188,0.00032400177,0.000059109712,0.0000017420621,0.00024070042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967034,0.00028285876,0.0026879366,0.00008043742,0.000043505406,0.0000047366707,0.0000051099864,0.0000044280678,0.00018761063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613476,0.00024982973,0.0005187004,0.00013273381,0.0028294527,0.00013452758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887762,0.009360838,0.0004740436,0.00012260178,0.0011992308,0.00006710677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005235378,0.000053871277,0.00012284478,0.0020987205,0.0003041902,0.0007607198,0.0003530896,0.00002592419,0.00013941666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027123872,0.00002747434,0.00008165701,0.010111588,0.00014641191,0.0005892579,0.00013055153,0.00011789045,0.000003120972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003894708,0.00046381596,0.27876437,0.00007423631,0.00017035926,0.000012202847,0.008104765,0.0003967114,0.010659187,0.0062230295,0.06897607,0.6257658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029012437,0.0008757358,0.86063486,0.000074672986,0.000086731074,0.000062566454,0.032787733,0.005389035,0.0100447,0.07767632,0.009319816,0.00014657743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011273364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001836978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62561923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006891928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022181556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98107105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329990976","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Nature Journals.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Green teacher","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Outdoor education; Mathematics education; Environmental planning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.850606776780821,"score_gpt":0.6626810945041159,"score_spread":0.18792568227670503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329990976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8284052,0.011031625,0.0007135614,0.0073095122,0.0007066657,0.00018830801,0.000008425186,0.00005261497,0.15158409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91701716,0.00007515241,0.0015006061,0.00040869394,0.0003335004,0.000004133137,4.953971e-7,0.000011291164,0.08064898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672986,0.00037335153,0.00053142617,0.00055703457,0.011255954,0.000552396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551296,0.0013773259,0.00020605301,0.0007528204,0.0017747108,0.00037611413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028400678,0.000120985795,0.00021573095,0.025655678,0.00027553126,0.001890267,0.002185867,0.00023462324,0.027672052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037792493,0.00007749816,0.00016003463,0.1042224,0.00007450357,0.0005272961,0.0004480816,0.00099377,0.0040876227],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023333535,0.000067889705,0.12305838,7.803071e-7,0.000008554449,0.000012175027,0.00015753176,0.0000074988093,0.00037270968,0.00007129838,0.1045097,0.77173114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012375939,0.00035427473,0.4849073,0.000020594485,0.000016858696,0.00007504739,0.0004454644,0.19053483,0.00045354755,0.025846094,0.29553166,0.0005767183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006356558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007900321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77115446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007512366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000301003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332188426","doi":"10.1016/j.ausmj.2015.04.001","title":"Research Performance of Marketing Academics and Departments: An International Comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Marketing; Citation; Political science; Public relations; Business; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.6761651646436725,"score_gpt":0.6069841516591631,"score_spread":0.0691810129845094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332188426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98598546,0.00036751875,0.00012663695,0.001278389,0.0007127189,0.00013736481,0.000009206358,0.000012266519,0.011370461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916105,0.00075533864,0.0055769584,0.000026154175,0.00034042497,0.0000028434497,0.0000027223057,0.000016540786,0.001668482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809278,0.003951705,0.0016143004,0.0006457362,0.011894886,0.0009655287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984,0.008084568,0.00074730767,0.00046248068,0.005514208,0.0011913973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24919663,0.00017731226,0.00039562388,0.021384833,0.00045745046,0.0023084194,0.0027084996,0.00019906447,0.0002782006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09996391,0.00013630287,0.00009158455,0.030602328,0.0002709093,0.0018543326,0.00083739945,0.0016504374,0.000038121907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000549654,0.00010174322,0.84788376,0.000009691269,0.000022515183,0.000016955591,0.00017594938,0.00008718091,0.0002475513,0.000018443836,0.013966772,0.13691978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008051971,0.00042880516,0.9472902,0.00009895731,0.000007077961,0.00026939804,0.0041638985,0.017833417,0.00032069566,0.00042753865,0.028169721,0.00018511557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021516387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056522404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14923272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003876457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031122493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342331558","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00771","title":"Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject matter; Similarity (geometry); Interpersonal ties; Geographical distance; Economic geography; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Epistemology; Economic growth; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5123037864089308,"score_gpt":0.53942883396618,"score_spread":0.027125047557249204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342331558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56994504,0.4063571,0.017335275,0.001441821,0.0003435092,0.00065164326,0.0010239028,0.0000052623436,0.0028964323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12306092,0.83237046,0.044240654,0.0001238503,0.000050524934,0.000009261062,0.000005365707,0.00000719309,0.00013178767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983725,0.00012561202,0.00073137536,0.00025659805,0.0003465061,0.00016739343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894295,0.009090971,0.00025468826,0.00041744683,0.00070285215,0.00010455755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009238378,0.00008708137,0.00035326055,0.0029027467,0.000106786625,0.000307671,0.00060873985,0.00003190929,0.0001288597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013077038,0.000053181913,0.00003497287,0.008153385,0.00037422153,0.00015493484,0.00031929408,0.000088085595,0.00003558033],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011772534,0.00014769073,0.03143942,0.0009961965,0.00005230599,0.0000013849284,0.0017779995,0.00000831583,0.000017751963,0.11899863,0.014358868,0.8321897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000389721,0.00030669858,0.16018029,0.0028077,0.000064798536,0.000006510456,0.000643001,0.154512,0.000027389002,0.642465,0.038271304,0.00032558577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014424934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040414778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83186406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016967977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010489593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W349922622","doi":"","title":"El objetivo de la gerencia científica: ¿Excelencia o calidad?","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eduweb","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Unintended consequences; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Term (time); Public relations; Work (physics); Conjunction (astronomy); Business; Public administration; Engineering; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.22489398970429672,"score_gpt":0.5198774202832317,"score_spread":0.29498343057893495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W349922622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255758,0.013302724,0.0021136915,0.0015388157,0.0007210078,0.00091519876,0.00013852626,0.00008018679,0.055614073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98323715,0.0057058316,0.0009591434,0.00038891248,0.0005016449,0.000062904306,0.000008060228,0.000047948797,0.00908839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834555,0.0019902957,0.0016191788,0.0016031807,0.00931229,0.0020195947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97980535,0.011592894,0.0007064455,0.0020040814,0.004020619,0.001870616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031923596,0.0005248638,0.0009981666,0.034541484,0.0006682759,0.022869242,0.004585809,0.00056937814,0.010133908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057264026,0.0004006474,0.00061018375,0.14517222,0.0008449345,0.0010206298,0.0014661985,0.0010374365,0.014057227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021716569,0.0009338623,0.3360619,0.00021670928,0.00008254398,0.00012291607,0.000453829,0.000008747374,0.018796895,0.03390939,0.31929567,0.29009584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042492428,0.00017960864,0.41221818,0.0001410403,0.000034345092,0.00004023487,0.00037999003,0.0033184742,0.00079364056,0.0030299681,0.5788684,0.00057123374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005531322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021459061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2895246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006056889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001654406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40023826","doi":"","title":"Promoting Public Access Policies: A New Role for Librarians","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Outreach; Publishing; Public relations; Subsidy; Political science; Library science; Scholarly communication; Equity (law); Best practice; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.7134962743651571,"score_gpt":0.6116044235522415,"score_spread":0.10189185081291552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40023826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7227311,0.00015130738,0.05279829,0.066457614,0.0017221872,0.0012744581,0.000046019075,0.00025535264,0.15456365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593378,0.000008634756,0.008166174,0.0010003153,0.00042963502,0.000030241928,0.0000034052987,0.000018031053,0.03100579],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330175,0.000048551607,0.0005470884,0.0006674047,0.0045871064,0.0008480782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120396,0.0046748645,0.00019061056,0.0009326825,0.0019646948,0.0010331952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011864083,0.00012729003,0.00022566499,0.043128952,0.00034909314,0.018130936,0.0054369173,0.00014023451,0.0033296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07413538,0.00007996122,0.00016471319,0.1605764,0.00008933119,0.0028267775,0.0012502623,0.0002863971,0.0002934958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000832807,0.00014038621,0.08508809,0.0000032730272,0.000010884364,0.0000010882416,0.00048330898,0.0000010375836,0.008206864,0.037808597,0.22398336,0.64426476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005136568,0.000112622874,0.024480652,0.0000016147796,0.0000020143311,0.0000061496557,0.00033573614,0.017820163,0.0061443443,0.11347937,0.8369022,0.00020148042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036742666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023439304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6440633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018856572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007455418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200119498","doi":"10.1302/3114-210143","title":"CORS Paper Session: Top Canadian Research - Founder's Award Candidates Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"OrthoMedia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.46773553415353303,"score_gpt":0.5678674728009943,"score_spread":0.10013193864746123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200119498","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001251796,0.0023823816,0.000009523507,0.012976737,0.010098871,0.00048506467,0.97135663,0.000023396047,0.0014156033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000892143,0.004748708,0.00014609334,0.00050038745,0.0049281646,0.00008827216,0.9708709,0.00004221636,0.017783076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97148,0.0014620895,0.0012265919,0.002423294,0.021190275,0.0022177105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777973,0.0064945556,0.0003549214,0.0036582772,0.00891588,0.00277905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038173605,0.00046111463,0.0009047055,0.114368625,0.0012135602,0.0074990178,0.0050125495,0.0009863072,0.03802077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09951277,0.0003439638,0.000297185,0.22333606,0.00064316153,0.00086553354,0.0018144556,0.0027182375,0.0071635093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001156837,0.00007022651,0.003147352,0.000024492478,0.000031915675,0.0003979265,0.000027337814,0.000002586613,0.00001429283,0.000024349645,0.9758277,0.02042023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021059954,0.00010286481,0.004432399,0.000030140289,0.00001244886,0.000044842385,0.0004705284,0.000023925088,0.000028658664,0.0008263372,0.99340814,0.0004091182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14114486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43124357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2900987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013438767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008069252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200179249","doi":"10.5194/ica-abs-3-327-2021","title":"Mapping academic migration of German-affiliated researchers across countries using 8 million Scopus publications from 1996 to 2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts of the ICA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Scopus; German; Political science; Library science; Regional science; Geography; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.5778530138453009,"score_gpt":0.5904958469721848,"score_spread":0.012642833126883968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200179249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886183,0.0008690875,0.00026486506,0.009088768,0.0002657878,0.00023074329,0.0002865599,0.000010334433,0.00036555133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741274,0.00028318935,0.0013563003,0.00015474972,0.00005370229,0.0000043358514,0.00001682744,0.00000846515,0.0007096678],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921477,0.0002523834,0.0010015572,0.000495014,0.005647123,0.0004562447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997176,0.0036774226,0.00056544965,0.0010247183,0.004489482,0.00027114188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009368744,0.00010809353,0.0002722125,0.005750152,0.00030263345,0.00065162306,0.0021744757,0.00016794827,0.00022838295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044012588,0.00007526375,0.00013655033,0.089628495,0.0002563706,0.0006053679,0.00093452656,0.0004000709,0.000071840965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000774763,0.00021692521,0.15736905,0.000030241199,0.0000810492,0.000006733773,0.0033395442,0.004685659,0.78041166,0.00016888585,0.035496376,0.018116398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020644079,0.00002172486,0.8029979,0.000076317454,0.0000054874013,0.0000028007962,0.0013409026,0.003365189,0.16814291,0.001521735,0.02220682,0.00011180131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022259767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042299993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6456288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119434735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005714152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200217035","doi":"10.1177/01622439211068798","title":"Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publishing; Sociotechnical system; Function (biology); Sociology; Aside; Sharing economy; Peer production; Public relations; Diversity (politics); Sustainability; Political science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.4501804417858459,"score_gpt":0.5881591697196226,"score_spread":0.1379787279337767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200217035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.579673,0.12866797,0.00044166477,0.21086718,0.032296326,0.0010508546,0.000016950431,0.00013547127,0.046850573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904157,0.0031367876,0.00065802154,0.00047774808,0.0021231964,0.000018811448,5.379732e-7,0.0000070158176,0.0031622031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892943,0.000233975,0.0008189755,0.0007480399,0.0083713485,0.0005333989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813542,0.0021300456,0.0005017223,0.00137093,0.0144482115,0.00019490036],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07987598,0.00011978228,0.00049035216,0.025836492,0.0011581648,0.0014293961,0.0041967155,0.00013501244,0.00039199513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11649173,0.00006554033,0.00012010583,0.19355322,0.009962052,0.0006342988,0.0018947527,0.0004794192,0.000035464527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016050306,0.00011968034,0.043710668,0.00003553015,0.00002820982,0.000012458479,0.00026547015,0.0000028450106,0.003989429,0.1547074,0.6968679,0.100244366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006951928,0.00008721204,0.008933467,0.00015363695,0.00001807326,0.000023732533,0.0006810961,0.000031117743,0.0044810832,0.6920341,0.2927022,0.00015908094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043603372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017842415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5373267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054204716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053442165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200247834","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.002","title":"Funding assistance and global productivity in the field of implant overdentures: A bibliometric analysis of 35 years","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Poisson regression; Medicine; Implant; Bibliometrics; Productivity; Dentistry; Demography; Library science; Environmental health; Economics; Population; Computer science; Economic growth; Surgery; Sociology","score_opus":0.23291440679425998,"score_gpt":0.5349318690618226,"score_spread":0.30201746226756254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200247834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932717,0.004674849,0.0010739192,0.00030856178,0.00035105486,0.00006936658,0.000048266003,7.7720046e-7,0.00020148816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989903,0.00042066246,0.0004164058,0.000033771103,0.000024515652,7.4730707e-7,6.015397e-7,0.000002183692,0.00011079047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928465,0.00031992863,0.0009820269,0.00027161982,0.005336894,0.00024302515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417794,0.0027435762,0.00095551164,0.00043871326,0.0015738785,0.00011038349],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014490074,0.00008190802,0.00049276196,0.16516575,0.000041724,0.0005914091,0.0010459664,0.000073842144,0.00008676431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02406878,0.0000512126,0.00025959048,0.6693465,0.00011630002,0.00028559362,0.00026440594,0.00024907815,9.5350777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005509488,0.00031762125,0.92993647,0.00002601778,0.00015254311,0.00046999336,0.00016978069,0.00003911239,0.002227505,0.00020032647,0.0018869668,0.06451854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030426696,0.00014049676,0.9949209,0.000031916836,0.00009591241,0.00046940017,0.0005222164,0.00011129121,0.0012254197,0.0015760073,0.00055009924,0.00005209083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049535258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007495537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005697903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022423296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200275016","doi":"10.1108/lhtn-01-2021-0001","title":"Highly cited articles in social sciences: an analytical study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scopus; Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Social network analysis; Social science; Collaborative network; Set (abstract data type); Library science; Scientometrics; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Statistics; Social capital; Political science; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.6832023079725885,"score_gpt":0.5845864305698747,"score_spread":0.09861587740271383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200275016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781394,0.00016980173,0.000119218865,0.0038309342,0.00021944953,0.00022685862,0.000015943291,0.00008608245,0.017192323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415064,0.000023410917,0.0016484325,0.00074998866,0.00019718142,0.000011121535,0.0000054667184,0.000012583067,0.003201147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905064,0.0007097774,0.00080121454,0.0011298772,0.006131205,0.00072151277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966258,0.0016782145,0.00011555636,0.00069696736,0.0005450017,0.0003384544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006474606,0.00015648142,0.00037360124,0.03824023,0.00041969772,0.004458423,0.0025264833,0.00011862757,0.0017089542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01090021,0.000114059316,0.0001148412,0.34282446,0.00029304373,0.003187791,0.0012087241,0.0003355426,0.00024076225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021047616,0.0012750195,0.87976235,0.0000012303551,0.0000067005235,0.00024019474,0.00033967895,0.000016081769,0.00038796905,0.0063170753,0.026978089,0.08465457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001088636,0.00064721785,0.90928227,0.000005879216,0.000006168978,0.000006156212,0.00844795,0.014217441,0.002497314,0.03715265,0.02630118,0.00034716504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008522219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089215435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3045842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036712358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005089927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200395585","doi":"10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4","title":"Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":938,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Terminology; Publishing; Data science; Strengths and weaknesses; Population health; Computer science; Population; Library science; Medicine; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.652587060367001,"score_gpt":0.6967628458869507,"score_spread":0.04417578551994972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200395585","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12756842,0.03384215,0.69538605,0.10588891,0.0070561157,0.00096526346,0.00002620779,0.00012455856,0.029142316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358486,0.006136074,0.14205182,0.006544131,0.0024207246,0.00032180033,0.000040270832,0.000053969547,0.0065826005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98567086,0.00097252044,0.00080706837,0.0013116566,0.010596315,0.00064159604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90955573,0.060009766,0.0007112044,0.0019139363,0.02511396,0.0026953814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05948411,0.00017035092,0.0003682181,0.13695721,0.00041316703,0.004798167,0.002418063,0.0003491818,0.0022256284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7677514,0.0001292189,0.00022387369,0.41679198,0.00017749392,0.0016280803,0.00049591,0.0010730888,0.00010692501],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017092674,0.00063028897,0.0051643876,0.0000071091395,0.000019598398,0.0000016973703,0.0020814126,0.0000032151559,0.00020612084,0.0243053,0.05017921,0.91738456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019848754,0.0005301767,0.099297084,0.00012583559,0.000037809892,0.00005040143,0.20438051,0.017545173,0.0029247259,0.18374409,0.48861232,0.0007670138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032507895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003341181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004534263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004114283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986865},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4200411224","doi":"10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00145","title":"Equitable Open Access Publishing: Changing the Financial Power Dynamics in Academia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Health Science and Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Power (physics); Key (lock); Scientific publishing; Business; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.6666360541358185,"score_gpt":0.6934644981662952,"score_spread":0.026828444030476684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200411224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08561185,0.006859434,0.0033937197,0.56542116,0.002678381,0.0010098185,0.00008590018,0.000024792533,0.33491492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96266085,0.0010069644,0.0012266233,0.034570385,0.000068715206,0.000014397844,0.000002585714,0.0000037420245,0.0004457506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859914,0.0005434798,0.0007231894,0.0011541974,0.0098231705,0.0017645424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837667,0.0070697134,0.0006328052,0.0010184279,0.0065748435,0.00093755306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17670684,0.00012315501,0.00027208633,0.0075257444,0.001956872,0.055062793,0.009865968,0.00020673191,0.00012420777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31897396,0.00007918361,0.00003034574,0.32783327,0.00048220262,0.023632435,0.014007751,0.0012067289,0.000045657354],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095083735,0.00015632124,0.07240729,0.0000114321165,0.0000029077944,0.00007606994,0.000679634,0.000049388073,0.000007935501,0.27830046,0.047837846,0.60037565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008914006,0.00020590641,0.32503924,0.000048687496,0.0000046686287,0.00040383462,0.025149398,0.028540421,0.000029434606,0.075757,0.543563,0.00036699907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002020767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014188805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87704897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014342933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200513059","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.095","title":"Ten Years of Publications: Scientometric Comparison of Major Neurosurgical Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Neurosurgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Surgical Specialties (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Family medicine; Peer review; Library science; Demography; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.7736103544391487,"score_gpt":0.6341894885965442,"score_spread":0.1394208658426045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200513059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050883787,0.99392426,0.000074351556,0.00015881711,0.0026623164,0.0005215999,0.0002455852,0.000028094644,0.0018761512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021365809,0.98941535,0.00017570225,0.00004738829,0.00018742075,0.000036501086,0.000030299972,0.00005928474,0.007911456],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714463,0.0021088792,0.006250599,0.0016947004,0.017493187,0.0010063467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436771,0.04257353,0.0050328746,0.00259248,0.0053017386,0.0008222776],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030797811,0.00047535799,0.005036077,0.3378414,0.00018469285,0.0026628082,0.00550673,0.00030878297,0.0018338035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14967093,0.00036674135,0.0024408626,0.6691476,0.000593892,0.0005690237,0.0020506373,0.0012570386,0.00018709405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033876727,0.0005511791,0.012290405,0.0004995624,0.000045768433,0.00002680703,0.000008591862,0.000004258538,0.000010398294,0.00026508156,0.07171113,0.91458344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012823913,0.00005040744,0.0077895103,0.0011038824,0.00010971306,0.000044491797,0.000011987666,0.000048811613,0.000025331874,0.00007239455,0.9903208,0.00029442026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012907888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032115381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011691448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015275282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200604447","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.003","title":"Open science failed to penetrate academic hiring practices: a cross-sectional study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; University of Ottawa; Hamilton General Hospital; McMaster University; Carleton University; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Open science; Publishing; Ranking (information retrieval); Medical education; Cross-sectional study; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9633189143454393,"score_gpt":0.8121707407502468,"score_spread":0.1511481735951925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200604447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805101,0.00040753174,0.004240791,0.008370556,0.0044514504,0.0003109331,0.000005596123,0.0000053762474,0.0016976661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812055,0.00030895765,0.012890224,0.003134589,0.0009269191,0.000005692585,3.347589e-7,0.000008970776,0.0015187862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9411407,0.018991001,0.019918943,0.0028694787,0.015213863,0.0018659999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40725887,0.52406114,0.023706723,0.0026519867,0.03761988,0.0047014044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.64896536,0.00018094505,0.002251417,0.017668286,0.000483758,0.0026446534,0.0132699255,0.00034544108,0.0009914777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9613204,0.00011456937,0.00055320014,0.0907686,0.00079802005,0.0025625408,0.0065538604,0.0027657694,0.00045823515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028080976,0.0004524617,0.97358483,0.000001456433,0.000040430095,0.00013054484,0.000044264063,0.0007238682,0.00021977769,0.0007029732,0.0036002225,0.02021836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012075529,0.0013827056,0.9661521,0.000011209063,0.000009565828,0.00015226814,0.00039942723,0.0009412324,0.000049434624,0.01577746,0.013792357,0.00012473286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009347742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059113027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53388184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017829397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048141046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205093351","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4","title":"Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.602524977077691,"score_gpt":0.5280129047586363,"score_spread":0.07451207231905477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205093351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070815636,0.0045275153,0.0012564255,0.0006870775,0.000933489,0.00037759088,0.00021826506,0.000047714755,0.9848704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015549341,0.00034773146,0.0015236383,0.00014555351,0.00020509017,0.000013786777,0.0001041801,0.000035520585,0.98207515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97235507,0.00030490806,0.0016277863,0.0013706911,0.023726048,0.0006155117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954122,0.0039756005,0.0008520271,0.0022348522,0.038266733,0.00054876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025905348,0.00031885537,0.00084053166,0.096843936,0.00020537022,0.017623952,0.005324449,0.0007731844,0.00965314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10953963,0.00023262214,0.0005235184,0.1578513,0.0003018654,0.004276377,0.001423463,0.0012968312,0.0011632525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017627544,0.00013540237,0.030385617,0.000030780877,0.00011215372,0.000016467688,0.00010057014,0.000001202119,0.00035786518,0.042834908,0.79125786,0.13474956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030198033,0.00018523577,0.055767708,0.000043244425,0.000022110316,0.000005654382,0.00011711035,0.00002884016,0.0008768878,0.026511215,0.9157355,0.00040452622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008352969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020692489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13434504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033464486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034451864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205204355","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_20","title":"Publication performance of Indian authors in high impact anesthesiology journals: Are we doing enough?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anesthesiology; Distribution (mathematics); MEDLINE; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.5393516176418273,"score_gpt":0.6275804711053232,"score_spread":0.08822885346349596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205204355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98117274,0.0023385095,0.00005628242,0.014161662,0.0020301938,0.00012741819,0.0000070607093,0.000005483445,0.000100622456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790539,0.01771744,0.0013437768,0.0012562895,0.0005131458,0.000003008262,0.0000021301598,0.000014747633,0.00009554285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859578,0.0051472713,0.0051232297,0.0006503883,0.0022725135,0.0008488187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97015315,0.015077433,0.005278014,0.00055629195,0.008131619,0.00080348406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05428121,0.00023965602,0.0017725783,0.026043968,0.00013426153,0.00018161669,0.0025561287,0.0007315008,0.0018295944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036551204,0.00015980439,0.00063865946,0.03963657,0.0007133443,0.00075157935,0.00033567214,0.0020338332,0.000065532695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046037653,0.00068068074,0.81232727,0.0000100346915,0.000080001744,0.00072643516,0.000072314666,0.00089231593,0.0010805809,0.000032115455,0.012945909,0.170692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019844219,0.0051687295,0.9782932,0.000042810087,0.000029924344,0.00060500175,0.00022774714,0.0007155249,0.0015128551,0.0019205974,0.009338178,0.00016103788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021897464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001172502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17053096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018731105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017045959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205335600","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0073","title":"Language of citation and publishing performance of graduate students in French-speaking countries with different economic and linguistic advantages","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Publishing; Socioeconomic status; Publication; Citation; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.23947992711940594,"score_gpt":0.480401876642018,"score_spread":0.24092194952261206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205335600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986805,0.0008327678,0.000024502106,0.000052290558,0.00009898514,0.000121722216,0.000053483946,0.0000030408723,0.00013273401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996333,0.00019389112,0.00008247247,0.0000090746125,0.000007228056,0.0000061525284,0.0000037004581,0.0000035691558,0.000060615577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968463,0.00008657602,0.0003290542,0.00025028174,0.002326004,0.00016177495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835193,0.0009853088,0.00022686513,0.00015488775,0.00022497243,0.000056063524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490035,0.0000628692,0.00019861871,0.010432296,0.0000818605,0.00062548637,0.0004987167,0.000015901272,0.000045922356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024090458,0.000045954337,0.000012365284,0.007943185,0.00008965513,0.0004253773,0.00054678315,0.0001361261,5.954381e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020994452,0.00002850708,0.9854039,0.00001721255,0.000005100751,0.0000035268051,0.0044515063,0.00021569962,0.00014250551,0.000053429543,0.00003440352,0.009623238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004764422,0.00022400067,0.992224,0.000016100912,0.0000023973473,0.0000025703216,0.002303581,0.0040727495,0.00036758656,0.00014128821,0.00011389704,0.000055408556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042296728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017678677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009567829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000557439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040486782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93086296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205497103","doi":"10.1111/ele.13949","title":"Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"National Research Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Dilemma; Open access publishing; Payment; Political science; Business; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.43355794612484516,"score_gpt":0.5250981601662262,"score_spread":0.09154021404138107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205497103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7918687,0.000028999197,0.0024783877,0.20213962,0.001323692,0.00033210256,0.00007842724,0.000024406918,0.0017256954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96920216,0.0000051931543,0.006470305,0.021356357,0.00016856959,0.000099379,0.000013515346,0.0000152323855,0.0026692934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465996,0.00023535987,0.0004900904,0.0009401388,0.0027130165,0.0009614065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913195,0.004799452,0.00012451177,0.0007876185,0.002352519,0.0006164174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009396963,0.0001369215,0.000324358,0.02646059,0.00034446068,0.0029499428,0.0020304671,0.00011885957,0.0010739133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07639255,0.00011165268,0.00019414596,0.10311295,0.00012252957,0.00048931944,0.0008002384,0.00020112997,0.000394758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000403037,0.00013714826,0.16408084,0.0000033165875,0.000045240115,0.00013119467,0.0001561276,0.00008299441,0.010055255,0.001776867,0.7880098,0.035480894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007489335,0.00028546128,0.32392114,0.0000022691042,0.000009324032,0.000022742664,0.00041858337,0.0003151605,0.002303203,0.0035986379,0.6681044,0.00027010008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005304436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080995145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18078326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023488913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003493426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205638194","doi":"10.1038/d41586-022-00058-x","title":"For better science, increase Indigenous participation in publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Path (computing); Library science; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Biology; Engineering; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.3565946757863185,"score_gpt":0.5735883553595541,"score_spread":0.21699367957323562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205638194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912726,0.00040876446,0.00022472402,0.0034888529,0.00073630974,0.0003919904,0.000078125464,0.000014238758,0.0033843617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962946,0.0000030823032,0.0007385614,0.002175778,0.00008311123,0.000116731004,0.000013228868,0.0000061101277,0.0005687952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882126,0.00016527658,0.0003882448,0.0006358748,0.009923133,0.0006748591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948123,0.0024703569,0.00015655822,0.0004985708,0.0018036885,0.00025849775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04537652,0.000075864045,0.00014784526,0.062107787,0.00088175596,0.0045960606,0.0029847184,0.00023937851,0.000398283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0729535,0.000058356498,0.00006557452,0.24221018,0.00010911577,0.002036722,0.0010827075,0.0019645607,0.000016403113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008514947,0.0003809222,0.57505536,0.0000044734493,0.0000042190863,0.000023818033,0.0013163382,0.00042658503,0.0015452486,0.0032276788,0.07470471,0.3432255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009544337,0.00021144171,0.7040643,0.0000021998014,0.000002759273,0.000005808433,0.00083809404,0.010426169,0.0008546205,0.032434434,0.2499966,0.00020913254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117481715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049265487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3430164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037078615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005856223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99643725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206198473","doi":"10.1007/s11135-021-01307-3","title":"A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality & Quantity","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"CLARITY; Gray (unit); Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Psychology; White (mutation); Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7644337497125743,"score_gpt":0.6138022337726904,"score_spread":0.1506315159398839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206198473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97177076,0.00086013897,0.009734458,0.0054398444,0.00056282507,0.0004944149,0.0001503792,0.000038299564,0.010948868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990561,0.000060865674,0.00016986861,0.00043810287,0.000048344406,0.000050846476,0.0000022415006,0.000008433857,0.00016521719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856997,0.0042178608,0.00073424913,0.0012524414,0.0074515115,0.00064423203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865318,0.0103955725,0.00042198904,0.00092322944,0.0014558559,0.0002715876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07438533,0.00018326598,0.00042505364,0.013277159,0.0013448728,0.0040923012,0.0021437013,0.00011300823,0.0004468764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071126565,0.00011745067,0.00016439817,0.08383723,0.0006277197,0.0016794745,0.0020185953,0.0013515597,0.0000127957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025217797,0.0005314115,0.47648162,0.000005350829,0.000033483124,0.000025792455,0.011322132,0.0000496405,0.00006624135,0.50218326,0.0018233606,0.0072255046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003826786,0.00019405867,0.6304258,0.0000019474846,0.0000025463673,0.000009447074,0.10545969,0.00043989895,0.000011476617,0.2625689,0.00036854285,0.00013502562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00911367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028237433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23961438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015285654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002583122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206255780","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2021.802428","title":"A Protocol for a Scoping Review Comparative Bibliometric Analysis of Infectious Disease Research in Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital; Population Health Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; York University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Public health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); MEDLINE; License; Global health; Bibliometrics; Protocol (science); Medical research","score_opus":0.8577549250995014,"score_gpt":0.6881283510821358,"score_spread":0.16962657401736558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206255780","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015156606,0.046885602,0.0695136,0.02906641,0.0013215708,0.82825977,0.0009901255,0.000085664054,0.008720629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43378234,0.0018760986,0.0034197157,0.00058841665,0.000033156222,0.5599446,0.000037202288,0.000022477636,0.00029594026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97795707,0.005040992,0.0022399742,0.0011272349,0.012015201,0.0016195293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856832,0.0076743118,0.00087114074,0.0011701833,0.00353243,0.0010687541],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16869679,0.00015908715,0.0013656159,0.8689946,0.00050670555,0.0006365491,0.0025001443,0.000047663398,0.00037650723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044872623,0.00013197995,0.00029539783,0.97122985,0.0002136598,0.0005627352,0.0011257854,0.0007040185,0.0000039854476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013597579,0.0015882951,0.6674238,0.0020776424,0.000093256574,0.000009315834,0.00080878584,0.0006687874,4.1482457e-7,0.00048620798,0.1899919,0.1367156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004572778,0.0020823383,0.57688016,0.002409437,0.000028837163,0.000001536118,0.0034432716,0.108614236,0.0000014929066,0.010499074,0.29090998,0.0005569031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003362984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011115816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41862574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016249728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056129573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206266831","doi":"10.1101/2022.01.05.475103","title":"The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Collegiality; Promotion (chess); Discipline; Academic institution; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Management; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.21636138119647225,"score_gpt":0.44975308357864,"score_spread":0.23339170238216778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206266831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452118,0.1472123,0.00006638468,0.0037007337,0.0011637101,0.0020506894,0.00043682207,0.00004969019,0.00010788708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95633864,0.042961784,0.00023158247,0.000093017334,0.000088174485,0.00022711445,1.11716965e-7,0.000027066517,0.00003250123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894176,0.0010323711,0.0015004118,0.0012440846,0.006186102,0.00061942823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916699,0.0021276327,0.0010519898,0.0019453071,0.002876151,0.00032900993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044625048,0.00029150816,0.00072006456,0.011429141,0.0003709462,0.00070042285,0.0030197757,0.00035827645,0.00017631928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03972183,0.00020292644,0.00015211331,0.07470221,0.00034682217,0.00021706377,0.003795963,0.0018153038,0.000016780641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006740416,0.00043988967,0.9165936,0.0007639506,0.00009421904,0.00004467978,0.000035237885,0.0000428625,0.06312812,0.0055630184,0.012544889,0.0006821182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034957784,0.00009421172,0.8323289,0.0005097851,0.00002834043,2.7954973e-8,0.000028837669,0.0008092417,0.008206094,0.00045271206,0.15674356,0.00044871803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087046195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048074776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14419866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002870446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011364947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206478242","doi":"10.1080/1750984x.2021.1989705","title":"Citation network analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Field (mathematics); Data science; Function (biology); Citation analysis; Foundation (evidence); Computer science; Psychology; Management science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.32447096001178327,"score_gpt":0.5763294073670355,"score_spread":0.25185844735525226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206478242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6267097,0.25997767,0.003273591,0.019210216,0.0051917173,0.0008725604,0.00011680987,0.000031503598,0.08461623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91598725,0.0804079,0.000687871,0.0015802248,0.00005580207,0.00003916874,0.00005971946,0.0000039327138,0.0011781299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520695,0.000024385006,0.000725477,0.00039798114,0.0034740267,0.00017115368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794203,0.00017126677,0.00039234874,0.00033765731,0.0010602495,0.00009643153],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01162797,0.00006832669,0.00040253127,0.014483126,0.00010310226,0.00007367255,0.0011520488,0.000024332378,0.0068589584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006095794,0.000053156713,0.00020076588,0.066018574,0.00007143457,0.00012355154,0.0003962621,0.00013176832,0.000034472752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052201645,0.00010678656,0.6572612,0.00003310097,0.0001081903,0.000011494779,0.000031704967,0.00012982982,0.0000055474056,0.004038574,0.070305035,0.26791632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014626233,0.000053209955,0.6404925,0.00004972034,0.00006556083,0.000009724202,0.000043053522,0.0005780376,0.0000016914266,0.0086758835,0.34981495,0.00006941283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021352022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019831882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28927755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024365183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029578736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206983357","doi":"10.4242/balisagevol7.usdin01","title":"Serendipity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Balisage series on markup technologies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Luck; Face (sociological concept); Key (lock); Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer security; Social science","score_opus":0.7067267809977053,"score_gpt":0.5319341951220168,"score_spread":0.17479258587568847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206983357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5341503,0.00092740456,0.0016969627,0.0037381074,0.0014145311,0.00056763436,0.00013699634,0.002281627,0.45508644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866053,0.00047863074,0.0054707495,0.00011873758,0.000022064964,0.00003275269,0.0000025240577,0.000016110025,0.007253158],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306124,0.00015352585,0.0005883446,0.000900963,0.0045384355,0.00075750874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565107,0.0010909706,0.00022800219,0.0019284666,0.0009623819,0.00013911491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075378492,0.00024618115,0.00036516882,0.028333465,0.00033171245,0.0010183526,0.0046367366,0.00031171463,0.0022414648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03841117,0.00016239216,0.00016584131,0.08080282,0.0007701659,0.00096270465,0.0016039136,0.00045039898,0.001340389],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019728648,0.00027219238,0.07292542,0.000007680131,0.000029204177,0.00012807082,0.00022117278,0.0000011646825,0.0006546542,0.07505944,0.06567333,0.7848304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054944685,0.0014151903,0.25541136,0.000020575246,0.000010050658,0.000044737033,0.010743829,0.00009069971,0.07405129,0.35995802,0.29692134,0.0007834618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066585984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039166112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78404695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007874801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066318215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207049150","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00180","title":"Predicting the impact of <i>American Economic Review</i> articles by author characteristics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Exploit; Quarter (Canadian coin); Institution; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; History; Law","score_opus":0.6240591201744193,"score_gpt":0.6427755631256137,"score_spread":0.018716442951194345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207049150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816719,0.013546006,0.00013449657,0.0028138335,0.00039067946,0.00031544064,0.0004106389,0.000012597408,0.00070438924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964025,0.002839017,0.000266043,0.0001475328,0.00001647468,0.00004284123,0.0000012677253,0.000005591631,0.00027870323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919609,0.00053654914,0.00083945366,0.00064394175,0.0054415883,0.00057756103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862662,0.008832231,0.0011883858,0.00077335746,0.0027301633,0.0002096739],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043153156,0.00014201552,0.000514173,0.0069200587,0.0017633289,0.00039720064,0.0030104215,0.000007348561,0.00020848738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05871398,0.00007450304,0.00019365453,0.093041815,0.004189461,0.00054170325,0.001986805,0.00023952905,0.00005010218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065878776,0.00026253914,0.63336056,0.000035234105,0.00017972631,0.000004792905,0.0077495426,0.0004309362,0.0134251565,0.004727259,0.22666344,0.113094896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693172,0.005444131,0.8124467,0.00010845834,0.00005590339,0.000019954976,0.11214692,0.044417623,0.002552941,0.009152656,0.0125107635,0.0006746448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035494793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007521015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21415268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039180715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005443382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210255074","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.2.02","title":"Strategies to Increase the Number of Open Access Journals: The Cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Open access journal; Library science; Political science; Business; Computer science; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5532761290723078,"score_gpt":0.6122283546242888,"score_spread":0.058952225551980986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210255074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580271,0.0068989126,0.000097163924,0.024147283,0.00054346386,0.0002205699,0.00004140537,0.0000014970931,0.010022581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973512,0.00037073778,0.0005824177,0.0009847975,0.00014937764,0.0000045087886,2.4642253e-7,0.000009028008,0.00054764416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829064,0.0013924032,0.0015311828,0.0003054855,0.013502398,0.00036214865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97244596,0.010717818,0.0024198296,0.00080149865,0.01314928,0.00046559505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12039622,0.00012000133,0.0004404977,0.015015588,0.0008079619,0.216302,0.019032039,0.000094338255,0.0011703243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1552121,0.000055208664,0.00018268565,0.08051053,0.0001526422,0.09362901,0.011727584,0.0033890556,0.0000018261685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027710426,0.00022826422,0.6778256,0.000013697048,0.00014606547,0.00012481232,0.0012676545,0.00050249166,0.0014064991,0.0046660216,0.10257793,0.21096386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068310683,0.00023768206,0.6800468,0.000072653,0.000039302344,0.0011920548,0.024517559,0.000095315176,0.00027923242,0.02583803,0.26684028,0.00015795062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046985756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030283374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21080591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009742372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097531226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974275},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4210354806","doi":"10.1101/2022.01.21.477291","title":"Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Index (typography); Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive load; Content analysis; Presentation (obstetrics); Promotion (chess); Multimedia; Cognition; Psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.26881593312804025,"score_gpt":0.44616774012456956,"score_spread":0.1773518069965293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210354806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817763,0.0045959465,0.008943672,0.00041565325,0.0018106673,0.0008931978,0.0013310128,0.00013570805,0.00009784356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968985,0.00065053784,0.001610478,0.00029832174,0.00022771466,0.0001513358,0.0000018069812,0.000086778084,0.00007458297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775707,0.0017689617,0.0020709184,0.002746092,0.014576235,0.001267067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97890884,0.0054149902,0.0022113156,0.0064765047,0.006124648,0.0008636846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.047225196,0.0007077606,0.0018118056,0.10540216,0.0009211108,0.006834105,0.01066591,0.000599274,0.0014765195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026058476,0.00051732553,0.0010471855,0.3159593,0.00042221494,0.00082617253,0.0062585133,0.0022098601,0.000035939185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006186314,0.0006766353,0.97774994,0.000076812714,0.0014536232,0.000073938674,0.00013347408,0.004206532,0.01203109,0.00145509,0.0017959777,0.0002850171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040761902,0.00010714151,0.91519624,0.000031928346,0.0005752199,1.6197912e-8,0.00012110298,0.05342182,0.007588326,0.000029045867,0.021775382,0.0007461335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008700065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026385238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21055715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007305963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013355667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210401899","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100758","title":"Impact of institutional affiliation bias on editorial publication decisions: A bibliometric analysis of three ophthalmology journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Medicine and Public Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Impact factor; Ophthalmology; Blinding; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8774203146863786,"score_gpt":0.6741541490313949,"score_spread":0.20326616565498368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210401899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937891,0.0034165285,0.00727487,0.04391784,0.005735944,0.00036288658,0.00043467982,0.000011021324,0.00095519715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628794,0.0016997244,0.00020609314,0.00042750261,0.0012016852,0.000017873394,0.00011436304,0.0000063776274,0.000038446873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681299,0.0027218896,0.0025685122,0.0007722947,0.02511961,0.0006878121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206057,0.05580285,0.0028196876,0.0011240112,0.018387783,0.0012599513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17317446,0.00015487855,0.00089281425,0.6918303,0.0008141091,0.0003113652,0.001401347,0.00024383207,0.0029371772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4408161,0.000100440026,0.00028199368,0.8475218,0.00046645466,0.00052151957,0.00051811273,0.0015184936,0.0000050315543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110918416,0.0007726742,0.681527,0.000015417112,0.00041319238,0.0000037915233,0.0011420692,0.0012002592,0.000039862876,0.011958489,0.10166185,0.20115447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007902309,0.0029092752,0.96602243,0.000014086784,0.000031201813,0.000020499761,0.00044622083,0.0052137235,0.0000010836433,0.005976637,0.01848538,0.00008921777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035055103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005930147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28449544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043482005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059512635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996841},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4210431609","doi":"10.1161/atvbaha.122.317426","title":"Web of Science’s Citation Median Metrics Overcome the Major Constraints of the Journal Impact Factor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Confounding; Web of science","score_opus":0.4076204520865951,"score_gpt":0.498494001608876,"score_spread":0.09087354952228094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210431609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974359,0.00019697082,0.00037096633,0.00080770155,0.00063024065,0.00022370204,0.0002076323,0.0000032938865,0.0001235652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.0008136708,0.00011359975,0.00011057336,0.000023705508,0.0000061763876,0.0000014558482,0.0000061991836,0.000003913577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993345,0.0010429294,0.0007604619,0.0003653377,0.0040314095,0.000454861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948187,0.0023351992,0.0006296271,0.00066741987,0.0013510005,0.00019807447],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022246087,0.00013710014,0.0004063231,0.01173156,0.0012623608,0.00033514126,0.002635003,0.00006402699,0.0010652505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066892733,0.00006357352,0.00034631032,0.065294385,0.0033287557,0.00026418892,0.0013047867,0.00033255047,0.0000034585419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025281918,0.00010480634,0.7047869,0.0000025966565,0.00008765282,1.7126276e-8,0.0006933431,0.000011145994,0.28303456,0.0005339443,0.0003633566,0.0103791095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044021467,0.00042222996,0.9940864,0.0000040731506,0.000024542416,0.0000023438563,0.0015866403,0.00079116103,0.0007548005,0.0010159,0.0007908638,0.000080847945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012671878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018461425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28929946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011617646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005890588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210563664","doi":"10.1021/cen-v089n010.p012","title":"See You in Toronto!","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical & Engineering News","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Icon; Altmetrics; Social media; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4337777249594912,"score_gpt":0.4914867670297343,"score_spread":0.05770904207024313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210563664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555813,0.0008324737,0.0032177882,0.00009149941,0.000469765,0.00011829277,0.000004941559,0.000063616484,0.039620288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940368,0.00004264186,0.00483512,0.00003647027,0.00007355624,0.00000957535,0.0000011382789,0.000011581814,0.0009531192],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.996503,0.00001614159,0.00042819034,0.00044338664,0.0021147637,0.0004945265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0005966133,0.00004293558,0.0005054321,0.0002474948,0.00032142393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026399181,0.00011764766,0.00021633094,0.0057840575,0.000016854166,0.00024038514,0.001375705,0.00011153988,0.0022690336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01054369,0.000089468456,0.00008780984,0.032135956,0.000031165408,0.00035043963,0.00034006336,0.00020633702,0.00040104578],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007646454,0.00076537515,0.19875924,0.000034146728,0.00003488722,0.00016644839,0.0019594282,0.00025172989,0.43854764,0.008121421,0.030484106,0.3207991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025421523,0.0002551675,0.3253076,0.00006577299,0.000011478426,0.00004071991,0.0011441534,0.06957125,0.43178648,0.008131248,0.15942042,0.0017235714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011382395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036867827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31907552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024249387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003181457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211053938","doi":"10.1007/s11845-022-02943-w","title":"Publish or perish: the dilatory fate of “in press” papers in contemporary scientific publications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publish or perish; Library science; Classics; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.7215413523076528,"score_gpt":0.5723215383077955,"score_spread":0.1492198139998573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211053938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05452307,0.0032905887,0.00004906956,0.91422564,0.0057329275,0.00063986913,0.00012050175,0.000012502894,0.021405818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85510015,0.0013564266,0.0004735279,0.1171403,0.0023230335,0.000082132465,0.000026776048,0.00007638871,0.023421237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9219303,0.0016056052,0.00359507,0.0013189844,0.0701806,0.001369428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97507125,0.011817802,0.0033266998,0.0019994606,0.0065595303,0.0012252588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19614753,0.0002958541,0.0009911979,0.06867695,0.00066484715,0.007093771,0.024644243,0.0005447154,0.0080595175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21258943,0.00015430397,0.00039866034,0.22148198,0.0060187057,0.0026033977,0.003003106,0.0061043347,0.000017743281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023794324,0.00019114873,0.0108128255,0.0000135737355,0.000009755561,0.00048067048,0.0003896155,0.000019570962,0.000036699705,0.000041169737,0.9757812,0.012199986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006440362,0.00015920096,0.021423675,0.00010178456,0.0000057014545,0.00011478517,0.0014466508,0.0009214913,0.000019537745,0.0003175689,0.9746514,0.00019419033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030169194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007141988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8005771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005783845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013427512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99668634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244701","doi":"10.2200/s00624ed1v01y201501icr039","title":"Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Information retrieval; Data mining; Library science; World Wide Web; Social media","score_opus":0.18781506921347418,"score_gpt":0.47355070394287563,"score_spread":0.28573563472940144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211244701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356328,0.0015078554,0.058098905,0.00037448006,0.00024484232,0.00030705926,0.000046474226,0.000039334373,0.0037482071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880105,0.0005315681,0.0001947488,0.00036726386,0.000033457934,0.0000042898505,0.000029921926,0.0000042666306,0.000033453784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950038,0.0002633087,0.0007916729,0.0002743975,0.0034377028,0.00022912341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99276704,0.0034287134,0.00059576536,0.00031609036,0.0026195906,0.0002727758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073143495,0.0001470027,0.0003749361,0.019533876,0.00017775185,0.0014357271,0.00047388603,0.00015975459,0.00010635194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107729295,0.00010302428,0.000084883235,0.053476907,0.00014621743,0.0016273576,0.00013068247,0.00009885992,0.000016129006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012715233,0.00012446397,0.39303508,0.00018198598,0.0005516308,0.0000012926408,0.012651988,0.027549755,0.00017332398,0.006517972,0.002167244,0.55577374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009894829,0.0005387019,0.45136,0.00004926906,0.00024078741,0.000003447552,0.00797157,0.517246,0.0060864957,0.0039208014,0.011122118,0.00047132935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001213861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035556077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5553024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036043468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066884524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212770965","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.6","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Work (physics); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212770965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399759,0.0018673557,0.027447408,0.18768564,0.017886538,0.00015140594,0.0000166052,0.00002106909,0.024948038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728379,0.00007627319,0.010628991,0.008525103,0.0068572685,0.0000011294982,9.2183836e-7,0.00002264645,0.0010497492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772671,0.00023577722,0.0014351124,0.0003737762,0.020107837,0.00058040174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97560656,0.0021563761,0.0011511658,0.0005655471,0.019593665,0.00092668046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06278511,0.00014264676,0.00037692513,0.06294875,0.00031232226,0.22701459,0.0059720613,0.00024287544,0.0012071467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16287848,0.00009163632,0.00030958926,0.10457364,0.00009981791,0.1487791,0.0007029858,0.0023027037,0.00043617416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872205,0.00008861729,0.16330764,0.0000018309736,0.000018459175,0.00006997185,0.00013223875,0.00012049767,0.0008719123,0.0003853515,0.8261366,0.008848165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013742992,0.00025991496,0.11503638,0.00004693572,0.000009755914,0.00025290347,0.00078026886,0.000019754501,0.0012546807,0.050061323,0.83071107,0.00019273725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117085925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048647817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23286197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037604923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060946064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212870265","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04285-x","title":"Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Science policy; Scientometrics; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.4464727771215093,"score_gpt":0.578309172696832,"score_spread":0.13183639557532273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212870265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92864186,0.0002531483,0.00095357304,0.002390833,0.0004817899,0.00036589528,0.00037409493,0.00004346586,0.066495344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871949,0.000108153305,0.001398882,0.00013002669,0.00002764337,0.0000066133834,0.000002517645,0.000007173505,0.011124109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755877,0.00018062767,0.0006791027,0.0015177748,0.020959802,0.0010749503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977461,0.005715579,0.0008815358,0.0021861007,0.012057661,0.0016981188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.060403705,0.00015402885,0.000285068,0.30223393,0.0051577026,0.0018893303,0.010023129,0.000039847597,0.0006386898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15605552,0.00013735727,0.000105501036,0.798468,0.009322685,0.0018991062,0.009329715,0.00033187043,0.000058663696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231434,0.0006916583,0.7255284,0.000008313908,0.000010805074,0.000002626248,0.0012704588,0.00014019314,0.07739825,0.104712255,0.023323601,0.066881076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045915923,0.00024788885,0.87894547,0.0000019106867,0.000004861083,0.000045760982,0.0016962192,0.0022191794,0.004234893,0.0035983382,0.10833031,0.00021603427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024596942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007154295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49623403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025332859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00418789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213005437","doi":"10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1","title":"Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Public Health; University of Toronto; McGill University; Institute for Work & Health; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Receipt; Mega-; Control (management); Peer group; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.850221086539673,"score_gpt":0.6727948306867655,"score_spread":0.1774262558529075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213005437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074303545,0.59978276,0.0003899149,0.27034512,0.0015833759,0.003260995,0.0018694651,0.000046385616,0.04841843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5085676,0.40391073,0.0005851237,0.0014528848,0.00017508576,0.00024919797,0.00010429606,0.000028791574,0.0849263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455048,0.0039571417,0.0014733401,0.0008800773,0.04729683,0.0008878273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345699,0.0145398965,0.00061864237,0.002243379,0.046927497,0.0011007093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27370593,0.00015107995,0.0008125117,0.014870534,0.0006951483,0.000750122,0.0031018483,0.00007152838,0.008623855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29525575,0.000102913946,0.00025328275,0.09895887,0.00046855534,0.0002879187,0.0028723339,0.002721567,0.00019163216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015664444,0.00015340834,0.009204247,0.00066258654,0.000012674318,0.000017793036,0.00007860716,1.3137237e-7,0.00003621878,0.005264833,0.5241783,0.4603755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011579502,0.00026985566,0.011330526,0.00025593693,0.000007696708,0.00002553641,0.00020258597,0.0001376688,0.00002366545,0.0040096412,0.9835073,0.00011380342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028959915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070037213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46026167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014950777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059349544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995792},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4213144810","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.02.003","title":"Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Perspective (graphical); Outcome (game theory); Management science; Conceptual framework; Data science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Social science; Machine learning; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6263016262214871,"score_gpt":0.5878043241387226,"score_spread":0.03849730208276447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213144810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98398215,0.0005264742,0.000946982,0.0020906283,0.0017272047,0.00017415732,0.000046533904,0.000034087374,0.0104717985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618655,0.000053653028,0.00026821892,0.00002601765,0.000051488445,0.0001302191,0.00004959706,0.000007840623,0.0032264143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171793,0.0011660918,0.00061916106,0.00074207823,0.0049888967,0.0007658081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956129,0.0029647094,0.00022000581,0.00048467354,0.00055592105,0.00016174326],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014704909,0.00012682582,0.00024627039,0.040153775,0.00049893645,0.00035477325,0.0013317865,0.000094131865,0.0049549066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005945735,0.00011579062,0.000087912085,0.0877807,0.0004147516,0.00075965194,0.0008941979,0.0005268598,0.00015305435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013255515,0.0009507875,0.5115697,0.0000028927482,0.000054800406,0.00005714654,0.0017922003,0.0819966,0.00088301976,0.08261249,0.040644422,0.2781104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003312713,0.001968943,0.8867902,0.0000014465182,0.0000066453244,0.0000060762627,0.027020242,0.013122299,0.00011465056,0.016302822,0.051102407,0.00025154848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017905203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042252426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37522054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017096192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004233587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213208735","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v30n3.1387","title":"Les enjeux de sécurité du partage des données de recherche dans les projets de recherche mettant en collaboration les établissements de recherche publics et le secteur privé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Library science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.7497172807194553,"score_gpt":0.5465070605128733,"score_spread":0.20321022020658197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213208735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78621256,0.012455038,0.093533486,0.099865764,0.00046474495,0.0015503544,0.0008082925,0.00027048265,0.004839296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6579862,0.014969038,0.3068029,0.0005662004,0.0005461121,0.00067116605,0.0002103986,0.00018466586,0.018063275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93854314,0.051886376,0.0017693959,0.001679615,0.0039208895,0.0022006098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587085,0.034073185,0.0009110496,0.0015827554,0.0036624682,0.0010619969],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14955837,0.00063119724,0.0007258573,0.012473706,0.0035270373,0.0053337174,0.003996242,0.0018088103,0.0017744218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18782002,0.0006502324,0.00032038434,0.08558228,0.0006281006,0.001963996,0.0016816466,0.0045511317,0.00003671272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090570786,0.002441108,0.30215457,0.00040947713,0.00023807153,0.00013243296,0.08539793,0.0013524652,0.11381973,0.017497623,0.019315101,0.4571509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015691896,0.00081896456,0.08226241,0.0003941127,0.00023856021,0.0005503978,0.072140284,0.01960931,0.069496386,0.122941576,0.6286109,0.001367871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040900357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024059042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60929585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027253581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023059806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213306805","doi":"10.17504/protocols.io.b5ddq226","title":"[RETRACTED] Cogni360 Amazon: UK, USA, Australia, South Africa, Canada, NZ (Ingredients Updates) v1","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Geography; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.6397574301341065,"score_gpt":0.5385881968415407,"score_spread":0.10116923329256577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213306805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532103,0.0010083766,0.001269806,0.0017005128,0.012626946,0.0016257033,0.0050494815,0.00010357967,0.1234053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8152283,0.00006720697,0.000806861,0.00029865996,0.0003202419,0.00009166085,0.00023931221,0.000044065855,0.18290372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95417213,0.0006731711,0.00230588,0.0034345621,0.037104033,0.0023102174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838523,0.0038957703,0.0013351565,0.0035318313,0.005404682,0.0019802507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024643112,0.00082785694,0.0013365657,0.06549708,0.00088976603,0.0068279137,0.0123288855,0.0008143476,0.15345806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029105064,0.0006468002,0.0006169791,0.16443129,0.0003035711,0.00038459065,0.015050141,0.0043427804,0.0024980782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003854879,0.00018849858,0.26936886,0.000022877473,0.00011541343,0.0002990243,0.00036094867,0.00055795006,0.00002514826,0.00028475493,0.7218761,0.0068618837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008624265,0.00021784485,0.35327756,0.00002926799,0.00006705607,0.000015830821,0.0023775967,0.0041361423,0.00023465084,0.0051827966,0.63193566,0.001663187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45230824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24008206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21222618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016158732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043959618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214484734","doi":"10.1101/2022.02.24.22271416","title":"Mapping publication outputs, collaboration networks, research hotspots, and most cited articles in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of medicine and health sciences in Ethiopia: analyses of 20 years of scientific data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; PsycINFO; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Library science; Medicine; Scopus; Family medicine; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.9403878692025578,"score_gpt":0.6835090594380469,"score_spread":0.25687880976451094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214484734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8224621,0.16966103,0.0005030157,0.00500961,0.00013529151,0.0019867502,0.00018806642,0.000004192562,0.00004997952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983477,0.015006866,0.0012525772,0.000037286016,0.000013192147,0.000066483306,0.000063023355,0.000006843658,0.00007670639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781038,0.0065385043,0.0040695546,0.0017353046,0.009052078,0.0005007268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98115593,0.010471698,0.0025828474,0.0019823676,0.0035983745,0.00020878564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2705973,0.00018531496,0.0022012899,0.08613074,0.00023314702,0.00092371716,0.0024699818,0.0001255349,0.00007083673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12012206,0.0001219855,0.000065668704,0.24596047,0.0019899479,0.00056808075,0.0039298097,0.000562961,4.3539228e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006375947,0.000619429,0.91708046,0.01955881,0.00092936814,0.000012448278,0.008294438,0.0029044992,0.010934021,0.0020027237,0.013819763,0.023780288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087164086,0.00039306795,0.81337583,0.002230981,0.0004974916,0.0000043252157,0.0114578735,0.16491759,0.0003704215,0.004804398,0.00073068833,0.00034567088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026609472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010600614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16201308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086471286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069600786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9242272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214763904","doi":"10.1007/s12630-022-02211-6","title":"An open-source toolkit to assist authors and collaborators during manuscript preparation: AuthorAndCollaborator toolkit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Open source; Computer science; Software engineering; World Wide Web; Library science; Programming language; Software","score_opus":0.1362915956851598,"score_gpt":0.4056556851371322,"score_spread":0.2693640894519724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214763904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6663794,0.0020675035,0.000050570266,0.3269041,0.0025280123,0.0010114192,0.00026930505,0.000019837162,0.00076985575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79882157,0.00041090004,0.0040522683,0.10393581,0.01887971,0.00016193623,0.000173913,0.0009522218,0.072611675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792239,0.002424335,0.0034689903,0.0016175824,0.010562388,0.0027027845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97224736,0.0011781056,0.0030769368,0.001688347,0.011062598,0.0107466625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032029465,0.0009996995,0.0021654917,0.06251944,0.003903908,0.031927377,0.012535901,0.0011391939,0.004009078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01167766,0.0008676413,0.0004004465,0.075791754,0.00046588984,0.0035982826,0.00041592374,0.0057103825,0.000068558664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020848389,0.000032107142,0.0043333084,0.000023294619,0.00009145255,0.32769367,0.0010296167,0.00030833774,0.000015194225,0.000041641066,0.6642001,0.0020227777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006521193,0.0024156822,0.004472223,0.000076912664,0.00007729083,0.34551322,0.0013785674,0.0000377402,0.000016695421,0.0002990536,0.6443247,0.00073575927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008572133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014216466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22296828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004242938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026143666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220726663","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/7yuje","title":"Favouring Responsible Publishing: Creating a Database of Researchers and Surveying Their Knowledge, Attitudes and Opinions towards Open Access Publishing and a New Field-Specific Journal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Snowball sampling; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.8888730633324748,"score_gpt":0.6516371918486598,"score_spread":0.2372358714838151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220726663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7604397,0.076365955,0.013260537,0.027094675,0.0021399038,0.0024728538,0.0010311555,0.00008436632,0.117110886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330508,0.036442094,0.022290125,0.00017189163,0.00051002146,0.000063199026,0.00012443899,0.00007532519,0.007272082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842918,0.0028934958,0.0018144887,0.0022262393,0.0076437495,0.00113026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345633,0.05051155,0.0017136666,0.002740421,0.0075145797,0.0029565077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13690631,0.00040986208,0.0010098246,0.057546664,0.001633348,0.25760484,0.01323807,0.00035900003,0.0013461503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23880261,0.00029825565,0.00014955466,0.06767744,0.0003292638,0.021303045,0.111152254,0.00399597,0.0000010665191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033313918,0.00023922745,0.27839184,0.00032808652,0.00017823598,0.00006390049,0.0047323275,0.00006417456,0.00019772163,0.0039782934,0.13180166,0.5796914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004645534,0.0007622497,0.7710566,0.002449119,0.000037348644,0.00034356993,0.029419621,0.009275159,0.00107507,0.06976373,0.10936081,0.0018112147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011644345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011571839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5778802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023849493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004153663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220877524","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04338-1","title":"Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time window","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Window (computing); Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Citation impact; Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.2744588650714582,"score_gpt":0.5399536004006232,"score_spread":0.265494735329165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220877524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933278,0.0011457123,0.0004284798,0.0014297593,0.0013937205,0.0005191043,0.000058800422,0.000011354456,0.0016853003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969249,0.000026688434,0.00007250484,0.0001155192,0.000029020994,0.00002020112,0.0000015103891,0.0000072704447,0.0028024302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98200136,0.00076254556,0.0005336002,0.000574779,0.01561731,0.0005104088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98061275,0.015337603,0.00050726935,0.0012520904,0.0020106167,0.00027963938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039560106,0.00013243733,0.00024681468,0.06512869,0.0014785513,0.0013092889,0.0041198824,0.000044008237,0.0003657265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09398838,0.000060919396,0.0002330613,0.54746395,0.00057902344,0.00035674177,0.0058919247,0.00045579096,0.000040432344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048550923,0.0004722862,0.69177157,0.000030287503,0.00004792501,0.000006802905,0.0034699466,0.00058611605,0.010552847,0.001568631,0.05059177,0.2408533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003983947,0.0003706958,0.9784735,0.0000040565405,0.000011274314,0.000013406973,0.0005296089,0.0066401265,0.0010800678,0.008498293,0.0038697487,0.00011083769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051014402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029873113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48233527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002523708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023502152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982136},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4220945597","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/nduxf","title":"Transforming excellence? From ‘matter of fact’ to ‘matter of concern’ in research funding organizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Austrian Science Fund; Fondazione Telethon; Wellcome Trust; European Molecular Biology Organization; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Michael Smith Health Research BC; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Meritocracy; Political science; Competition (biology); Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.7943442517530959,"score_gpt":0.6306071583946641,"score_spread":0.16373709335843178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220945597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454911,0.00033025807,0.013787605,0.0028299608,0.0006669688,0.0010413979,0.00062327506,0.000010842028,0.035218615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970383,0.00013900349,0.0020873686,0.00013318364,0.000046918576,0.000059265698,0.000036601163,0.000030159901,0.0077636675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801895,0.00084506924,0.002035539,0.0014227645,0.014602123,0.0009049804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98252577,0.010101384,0.0003776758,0.001594992,0.004999008,0.00040116787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028100811,0.00024272533,0.0008750539,0.10902278,0.00021628875,0.0009054983,0.0057479823,0.00026894544,0.11138658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013791616,0.00019289769,0.00019085727,0.22178504,0.00027474764,0.00031218305,0.0065327897,0.0013957216,0.0007817367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032498356,0.00023087581,0.9535715,0.00005917783,0.000029730809,0.000009344246,0.00439486,0.0017483752,0.006989459,0.00023519053,0.027105631,0.0055933427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014089774,0.0004425832,0.83554214,0.0004325377,0.000025804848,0.0000031082507,0.030481294,0.004060316,0.0501723,0.040921066,0.035218798,0.0012910942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009889386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032329457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11802939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040092904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089847896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221006456","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265545","title":"The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Publishing; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data source; Data science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Database","score_opus":0.867593310351548,"score_gpt":0.6062681864720891,"score_spread":0.26132512387945883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221006456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99403197,0.0016050343,0.000008827849,0.001821137,0.000043260425,0.00082136627,0.00009115787,0.0000014493625,0.0015758291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996871,0.00017092285,0.000051486913,0.000019026598,0.000004348827,0.000025566109,5.714298e-7,0.0000029744715,0.00003804022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782019,0.0011735056,0.00082458084,0.00046550305,0.01906706,0.00026742826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706351,0.024293113,0.0008616827,0.002237276,0.0018934718,0.00007931108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10096473,0.00007242566,0.00043483506,0.0058041317,0.0008172635,0.0007173103,0.016490353,0.00001300817,0.00009611562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050238248,0.000026308833,0.000047372392,0.07305405,0.0025971418,0.00039461258,0.016429711,0.00019460352,0.0000013477811],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027562242,0.004533368,0.6785308,0.00012920219,0.00057566224,7.931637e-7,0.0028256972,0.00050879235,0.23429999,0.012256536,0.01389071,0.049692206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035430307,0.0037512493,0.11448966,0.00020499482,0.00020590528,7.785724e-7,0.00696705,0.121954516,0.7413533,0.0047585946,0.0025668473,0.00020412695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027552372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036691054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56404114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002741277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033231318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99152523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221059829","doi":"10.2196/34258","title":"A Platform (Authorships.org) for the Objective Qualification and Order of Academic Authorship in Medical and Science Journals: Development and Evaluation Study Using the Design Science Research Methodology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; Universität des Saarlandes; Universidade de Macau; Universitätsspital Zürich; Universität St. Gallen; Rush University; University of Notre Dame; Universität Basel; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Usability; Order (exchange); Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Medical science; Software; Medical education; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.9672570135581235,"score_gpt":0.7727262080040803,"score_spread":0.19453080555404323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221059829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98218656,0.0016850819,0.0106298635,0.001754079,0.00011402176,0.0035590657,0.0000056918975,0.0000033967744,0.00006221399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703,0.00016810384,0.0019041122,0.000017132545,0.000022034345,0.0008245321,3.7131718e-7,0.0000072636335,0.000026444313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8652488,0.034246203,0.0029406543,0.002416678,0.09191315,0.0032344973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8404916,0.1348494,0.00061335147,0.00091679743,0.02238271,0.0007461599],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.78217196,0.0001312629,0.00031305334,0.044358112,0.0069759632,0.0012853821,0.003614553,0.00010648247,0.00006240532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23609023,0.000069652735,0.000023228546,0.17280175,0.00675622,0.0015401234,0.004654372,0.0026044326,0.0000015244293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007292573,0.00044569134,0.060613573,0.000036825062,0.000033749922,0.0000039317024,0.37620384,0.0002931826,0.0070838328,0.007686761,0.00013105673,0.5467383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008574917,0.0008274022,0.43592173,0.00002634405,0.000004344407,0.000037976486,0.27281138,0.2588492,0.0021651804,0.028246734,0.0001464135,0.00010578364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019277036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005382924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094712595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006682449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221093307","doi":"10.18438/eblip30015","title":"Researchers’ Perceptions and Experiences with an Open Access Subvention Fund","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Publication; Publishing; Public relations; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.6818213490106133,"score_gpt":0.610621507825644,"score_spread":0.07119984118496936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221093307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218974,0.0007493162,0.0047031166,0.060874823,0.00015474755,0.00086206367,0.00003885717,0.000052870077,0.010666778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98648,0.0005231744,0.0028952106,0.009103918,0.000022230739,0.00020576394,0.000030458204,0.0000052881846,0.0007339299],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366266,0.001180471,0.00045832625,0.00038947587,0.00403616,0.00027291934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188673,0.006357296,0.0003776209,0.00048764533,0.000491732,0.00039898374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485536,0.000098249926,0.00013183846,0.009984634,0.0014450753,0.028011737,0.0028551493,0.000034709014,0.006093893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284224,0.00007093622,0.00001778374,0.042005472,0.00020623203,0.53086895,0.0034267602,0.00034611573,0.000027866588],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075555067,0.0010016345,0.11164785,0.000097225515,0.00005023724,0.000053424006,0.0246268,0.0011440059,0.00018598251,0.12663907,0.05019491,0.67680335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008172454,0.0027095785,0.19061148,0.000035485904,0.000011619654,0.000082119164,0.21471837,0.026864542,0.00017295289,0.00081166305,0.5628459,0.00031905598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000631698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.0704995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6764843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024766005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004949121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223446648","doi":"10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0","title":"Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMC Research Notes","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Advanced Research Projects Agency; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Expert elicitation; Transparency (behavior); Constructive; Process (computing); Computer science; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Best practice; Technical peer review; Data science; Knowledge management; Management science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer security; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9135037421991614,"score_gpt":0.7274531204333806,"score_spread":0.1860506217657808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223446648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096353295,0.022762606,0.00041051875,0.9570151,0.0010490977,0.0018246899,0.00014817955,0.00009956238,0.015726702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042395033,0.028425898,0.0046079587,0.7835153,0.011173363,0.0027868669,0.0022451195,0.000379616,0.16262643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88537383,0.006454414,0.0015701203,0.0028332998,0.10147073,0.0022975907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86018336,0.07298865,0.0008627949,0.0050138757,0.059838686,0.0011126214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17022099,0.00045914756,0.00097577844,0.09149031,0.0015056818,0.0076740845,0.010797025,0.0005566646,0.01961023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57337475,0.00030223062,0.00039351304,0.2299639,0.00057693396,0.0017016871,0.0025251645,0.008292743,0.0030177871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024131983,0.00007170948,0.0013456958,0.00032460596,0.0000121142775,0.00020227506,0.00031087364,0.0000036873898,0.000020074227,0.000042579908,0.9466305,0.051011804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019507359,0.00050730706,0.0005288881,0.00028294398,0.000006289123,0.00002963362,0.00044201987,0.0007915813,0.000065725246,0.019350054,0.97737014,0.00043035107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014465803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037076406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40315378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005324053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00333648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223650565","doi":"10.1016/j.tibs.2022.03.012","title":"Moms in Proteomics: building a supportive and unified community together","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Biochemical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Proteomics; Field (mathematics); Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.566908889401357,"score_gpt":0.5752766945790945,"score_spread":0.008367805177737497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223650565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922946,0.00024875617,0.00004817346,0.0014777649,0.000095895564,0.00012218296,0.000020325002,0.000011364147,0.0056809005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976347,0.000015615278,0.0017533401,0.000113366186,0.000011500439,0.000041182517,0.0000022228764,0.000003824083,0.0004242308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934337,0.0007714396,0.0005609927,0.00064049556,0.0039832066,0.00061017106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968894,0.0022801773,0.00014531969,0.0003616219,0.00012994176,0.00019351495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03228795,0.00012099162,0.00025562503,0.028032817,0.0005439286,0.00061543426,0.002616282,0.00006213306,0.0008444822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006709687,0.00008844832,0.000052472562,0.1512515,0.00086099963,0.00029204207,0.0022733235,0.0007709651,0.000005317867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009396643,0.0007608504,0.74723846,0.0000050619037,0.0000051225657,0.000030828178,0.0027669005,0.0002648126,0.08351213,0.0040618596,0.003453418,0.15780662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019632909,0.0010719737,0.800105,0.000023619297,0.0000037100076,0.000039363986,0.018317534,0.023985565,0.04290061,0.10630927,0.0044844584,0.000795641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012430191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011141098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15701097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018780786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010115943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223985358","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265831","title":"Cumulative advantage and citation performance of repeat authors in scholarly journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Strasbourg; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Arizona; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Incentive; Citation analysis; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Library science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.7104620148666267,"score_gpt":0.5418942692396382,"score_spread":0.1685677456269885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223985358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99671936,0.0009142812,0.000045292993,0.00042001912,0.000046520647,0.00016223775,0.000021932461,0.0000045618717,0.0016657707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699104,0.00035510366,0.0012978534,0.00003309997,0.0000111217005,0.00001125772,0.0000014145317,0.0000044632056,0.0012946696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903666,0.00034838475,0.0005690862,0.00032274096,0.008160962,0.00023226604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636215,0.0016694359,0.00026528697,0.00026431622,0.0013039042,0.00013490055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0231567,0.00005914827,0.00022279115,0.03901153,0.00021238554,0.0006617569,0.00066811993,0.000030280604,0.00062905555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023032933,0.00004814116,0.00003055467,0.092939086,0.00006023334,0.0014730302,0.0005400288,0.00041902842,0.000013351582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000615169,0.0004948763,0.95861876,0.000011073799,0.0000147787805,0.000006797239,0.00077470724,0.00014737234,0.01851553,0.00015150517,0.00010412862,0.021098932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005585323,0.0005762478,0.94952977,0.000034380944,0.00000655167,0.0000029204962,0.0018219501,0.036552854,0.006984249,0.0036415143,0.00018551131,0.00010551548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019678191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029028165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053927556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008767136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006931339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224283948","doi":"10.3390/knowledge2020013","title":"The Rise of Platinum Open Access Journals with Both Impact Factors and Zero Article Processing Charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Citation; Scholarly communication; Open science; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6456818896578179,"score_gpt":0.6366664748306502,"score_spread":0.009015414827167723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224283948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98709154,0.0067902263,0.000285077,0.0002732119,0.00010708279,0.00027916225,0.000035150802,0.0000070801534,0.0051314635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818736,0.00009759929,0.00005163261,0.000008378342,0.000019588113,0.000016218495,4.41233e-7,0.000009667585,0.0016090896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995257,0.00032440625,0.00045787464,0.0003726688,0.0031627868,0.00042524765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949244,0.0028780724,0.00037916924,0.00041355845,0.0011281334,0.00027663825],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015111575,0.00011592742,0.0002678013,0.008316253,0.0015045464,0.008132431,0.00430297,0.000024432227,0.00083496975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005805498,0.00005154484,0.000060689592,0.07329668,0.00022695959,0.001426215,0.00380595,0.00026900694,0.000010028358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848491,0.00013959255,0.86634034,0.0000042114484,0.000017637307,0.0000027309802,0.0010752503,0.000036514357,0.00088555866,0.00008563558,0.008610796,0.12273323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006636161,0.00035541973,0.9634333,0.000014349392,0.0000077277045,0.000012733536,0.001870091,0.0066367784,0.0029409851,0.0051156115,0.018797014,0.00015233581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102593025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004713954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12258089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081111895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004314941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224316587","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059445","title":"Assessing the impact of predatory journals on policy and guidance documents: a cross-sectional study protocol","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ottawa Hospital; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Cross-sectional study; Protocol (science); Environmental health; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.7721978534082363,"score_gpt":0.7632492341181518,"score_spread":0.008948619290084503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224316587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8438905,0.000018300334,0.00003662629,0.0002560812,0.000094362986,0.14098231,0.000053794138,0.000004239762,0.014663785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287419,5.1234707e-7,0.000062298255,0.00008125259,0.000082332685,0.068542145,3.7010975e-7,0.000006842877,0.002482351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98748684,0.0012989913,0.00089715305,0.0004902836,0.009500004,0.00032670426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460614,0.002447668,0.00068932684,0.0008009519,0.0012866196,0.00016931782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07873661,0.00010160687,0.00023495252,0.014013605,0.0010468466,0.0136302365,0.0038981538,0.000025566456,0.0023080227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025896512,0.000052136114,0.00010406357,0.06517633,0.00012291798,0.0014818667,0.0048836237,0.0002773885,0.000014760508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019682094,0.00044881352,0.9841341,0.000002364014,0.000027671844,0.0000062123586,0.00016033593,0.0006872142,0.000097232434,0.00007267324,0.00555147,0.008615096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011010548,0.0010154115,0.99098027,0.0000060166067,7.941286e-7,0.000019711413,0.00064750883,0.00061726297,0.0000246227,0.0025387972,0.0029780066,0.00007054338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001169105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070373944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08485139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030446443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012613776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998604},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"protocol","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"protocol","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4225140398","doi":"10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7","title":"China’s Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Political science; Science policy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Higher education; Citation; Citation impact; Position (finance); Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8411194510935742,"score_gpt":0.6756913006516972,"score_spread":0.16542815044187698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225140398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92416805,0.0048450287,0.00023355719,0.050248224,0.00214486,0.0014694526,0.00010732408,0.000020675838,0.016762841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964975,0.000073385396,0.00022345674,0.00026381438,0.00011513169,0.00039699834,0.0000055289674,0.000005295293,0.0024188582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9625664,0.0010594776,0.00054006296,0.00096411636,0.03383564,0.0010343179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98636407,0.002234629,0.0002608425,0.0012365162,0.009595339,0.00030859647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20777427,0.00011022779,0.0001918551,0.01718655,0.004162999,0.0071831825,0.0061384374,0.0000393037,0.0008530358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06150865,0.00005952724,0.00012809566,0.24621883,0.0018242926,0.0015539818,0.0022655565,0.00035734338,0.00008656083],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009742548,0.00021581977,0.013198419,0.000005593078,0.000015239875,0.000010773091,0.00067451893,0.0007099098,0.0022863643,0.02067651,0.054510564,0.90759885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012747489,0.0010140084,0.35938197,0.000018920085,0.000017577846,0.00009145323,0.07495495,0.12306834,0.0012091561,0.2894324,0.14915444,0.00038201467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000883209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015690073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90721685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017660822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001920539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923885},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4225634029","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4066511","title":"Scholar Metrics Scraper (Sms): Automated Retrieval of Citation and Author Data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scraper site; Citation; Information retrieval; Computer science; Data mining; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.444686786635901,"score_gpt":0.5439794446972804,"score_spread":0.09929265806137944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225634029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716992,0.017686255,0.007435735,0.0017207637,0.0006113429,0.00021771183,0.00016226372,0.000048798232,0.0004179554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390686,0.0036839047,0.0008545468,0.00005328078,0.000065464534,0.0000015321606,0.000023080605,0.000015684862,0.0013956258],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399895,0.0010125573,0.0009808119,0.00069956935,0.011362344,0.0019457419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993216,0.002437095,0.00069282163,0.000994854,0.0023490852,0.00031013854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13599005,0.0001417043,0.00032319519,0.04880647,0.0010775002,0.001330334,0.003946627,0.00007686542,0.00026869454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056582645,0.00010981153,0.00009819779,0.18509819,0.00011686602,0.0014045063,0.0020780228,0.003043349,0.000021482192],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009074394,0.0010276308,0.10998722,0.00002380052,0.00059622485,0.00007506855,0.0009113081,0.0006619869,0.014892881,0.076588504,0.03555687,0.75877106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004920802,0.00439057,0.08103736,0.00002143749,0.0001283514,0.0021175975,0.021279374,0.23864716,0.0008267854,0.5788256,0.066878304,0.00092664093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039490573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018207988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75784445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007219205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030387975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226007804","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6128264","title":"Statistics on the papers published in the Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences from 2007 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Statistics; Data science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27967595202343104,"score_gpt":0.40158938821890844,"score_spread":0.1219134361954774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226007804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5380388,0.00039044308,0.0014493879,0.042643595,0.00072467525,0.001306964,0.0020723215,0.000028845727,0.41334498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985294,0.000016838829,0.00018060354,0.0008602744,0.000063609594,7.724291e-8,0.00003727804,0.00007287577,0.00023907489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370605,0.00089146587,0.00034262092,0.00033758624,0.0043550665,0.00036718822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967096,0.001282066,0.00015364285,0.00041402658,0.0011354588,0.00030522837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026590949,0.00007230322,0.00011727796,0.009848698,0.004808198,0.009036888,0.0046413974,0.000024073299,0.050047662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027075622,0.000041505802,0.000024981317,0.042866293,0.0003203415,0.00017596313,0.0011815168,0.0004996777,0.0005403403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070691,0.000058375732,0.0003242077,0.0000011430284,0.000008590177,0.000022651288,0.0030663053,0.0004886187,0.00026701464,0.024443047,0.8486853,0.122604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018422506,0.00030706142,0.018160684,0.0000024721678,0.0000020111095,0.000019508387,0.006866641,0.00025189904,0.000026924434,0.003803641,0.97030807,0.00006683825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007276244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024008416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46049058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017106238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007315139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226020442","doi":"","title":"Co-authorship Networks of Iranian Researchers' Publications on the Field of Management during a Half-Century (1969-2018)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Data science; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.821830678411475,"score_gpt":0.7113600348276967,"score_spread":0.11047064358377823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226020442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9275456,0.009583159,0.00083327736,0.0062367767,0.00081153505,0.0014473463,0.00013835357,0.00002002059,0.053383924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912106,0.0059636543,0.00011061173,0.00024846566,0.0000603875,0.00008981704,0.0000056502,0.000021963584,0.0022888593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98446286,0.0017042136,0.0015661654,0.0006883704,0.0108875055,0.0006909176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485744,0.009946897,0.0013952695,0.0016106622,0.001753566,0.00043617326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04165661,0.00020556108,0.00061070826,0.041023474,0.00093340623,0.003388034,0.014537589,0.00009168314,0.028340384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016347647,0.0001412427,0.00032285412,0.11036958,0.0002790441,0.001227053,0.0044877245,0.0010803019,0.000017665054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006886375,0.001416199,0.5789481,0.00008296878,0.0003516322,0.00003661862,0.00054562476,0.0027049375,0.008592096,0.0054184753,0.31467783,0.08653687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006163742,0.00008335603,0.9112507,0.00009915334,0.000025619547,0.0000051271263,0.0013048755,0.0011085639,0.0057633887,0.0108324895,0.068645366,0.00026499134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004938095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018348414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3323026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018701426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019382402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226144900","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/j5zyk","title":"POWER, EMERGENCE, AND THE MEANINGS OF RESISTANCE: OPEN ACCESS SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING IN CANADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Resistance (ecology); Rationality; Power (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6161184908163654,"score_gpt":0.5859941965470766,"score_spread":0.030124294269288754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226144900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50725406,0.0070975698,0.00024977548,0.019569954,0.0022713207,0.0015981668,0.00027373407,0.000008750218,0.46167666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874895,0.0011256716,0.0003902573,0.00055850775,0.000015885265,0.000079578684,0.0000066787666,0.000011841898,0.010322054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97524333,0.0011985628,0.0017732241,0.0015123567,0.019619608,0.00065292843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820775,0.009101399,0.0011693268,0.0021488338,0.005134281,0.00036866617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0887589,0.0002081298,0.0007569207,0.038661223,0.00035519514,0.08997333,0.03438337,0.00013442615,0.009389401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13301939,0.000120336976,0.00010212829,0.18847421,0.0002241848,0.010546456,0.076963805,0.002133004,0.0000019345534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020611519,0.00005112431,0.48580438,0.000032361055,0.00004167307,0.00003216657,0.0006315722,0.0002866194,0.0000068392023,0.023687102,0.4788731,0.010346968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023182759,0.000031436615,0.6001922,0.00007373158,0.000010015463,0.0000021396345,0.0155489445,0.002445078,0.000068241905,0.19273044,0.18599296,0.00058656617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94052505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48023546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005805911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008130124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226227977","doi":"10.5455/aim.2022.30.11-17","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Major Neurosurgical Publications 2011\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"\"&amp;#\".ord($0).\";\"2020, Part 2: Journal, Author, Yearly Publication Trends, and Citation Related Metrics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Informatica Medica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neurosurgery; Bibliometrics; Citation; Scientometrics; Medicine; Science Citation Index; Impact factor; Altmetrics; Pediatric neurosurgery; Library science; Political science; Surgery; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.36364441246250995,"score_gpt":0.4936006333206119,"score_spread":0.12995622085810193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226227977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8736111,0.0037110546,0.017193291,0.06460672,0.004367926,0.0016742357,0.0017416446,0.00044036898,0.03265365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554032,0.003207687,0.0065678493,0.00087184645,0.0002614048,0.00026770376,0.0020049727,0.00008693491,0.03132839],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678428,0.0015665403,0.005658669,0.0013422352,0.021897973,0.0016917745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96884894,0.012812827,0.0042400355,0.0030430316,0.008584091,0.00247107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04778552,0.00063605414,0.0016558476,0.68134046,0.0018859217,0.005262748,0.0054284586,0.00048680577,0.031691484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1340718,0.0005221938,0.0009015468,0.8648856,0.0007365994,0.0046966313,0.0024177274,0.002258978,0.0008086012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009536896,0.00095608947,0.042497616,0.000044597837,0.000972766,0.0000053706244,0.0018984537,0.00014782396,0.00026112824,0.0022584833,0.74819267,0.20266965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012360815,0.00032072133,0.1933748,0.000010340621,0.00056249846,0.00012669657,0.00078975555,0.008221206,0.0000085808215,0.00116353,0.7936601,0.00052570633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015524379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051229894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20214395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004863795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010159136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226265987","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20221063","title":"Ranking and Selection from Pairwise Comparisons: Empirical Bayes Methods for Citation Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Bayes' theorem; Nonparametric statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Citation; Statistics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Library science","score_opus":0.5529145655658193,"score_gpt":0.6077205054801893,"score_spread":0.054805939914369994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226265987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96301436,0.0017218413,0.03205901,0.0015689246,0.00010630857,0.00029249227,0.00003720063,0.000028896395,0.0011709358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95702165,0.00013008669,0.04220174,0.00024873053,0.000040840903,0.00006968001,0.000009937545,0.0000067504875,0.00027056917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968104,0.000106718806,0.0003713122,0.0006562054,0.001781489,0.000273913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466395,0.0041549597,0.00018356535,0.00006595456,0.0007506522,0.00018091917],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013037434,0.000105550746,0.00030991202,0.015022084,0.0009022509,0.0014361375,0.00034249676,0.000053482756,0.00031064783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006690467,0.00008187344,0.00011664383,0.07339488,0.00006930735,0.00031637924,0.00029449633,0.00017412187,0.0000010876746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007961247,0.0000378925,0.6920128,0.0000051132524,0.00011412435,2.1996298e-7,0.0011811833,0.000021748136,0.005108238,0.00035485902,0.007442708,0.29364154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007661302,0.0003945035,0.64457065,0.0000025799454,0.00019933873,0.00000423816,0.005702563,0.20701966,0.00043810555,0.013287431,0.12736899,0.00024583115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011825486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012268354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2933957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053525597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034350265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226317078","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0265506","title":"The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Collegiality; Promotion (chess); Discipline; Academic institution; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Pedagogy; Social science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6227565319145993,"score_gpt":0.5294402482117014,"score_spread":0.0933162837028979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226317078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93650854,0.05130478,0.0000032708567,0.009055666,0.000042852484,0.00057793595,0.000043150634,0.0000053171016,0.0024585032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857907,0.012682793,0.000064662934,0.00009055106,0.00001584842,0.00006137824,0.0000010872932,0.0000030270596,0.0012899112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197274,0.0004752607,0.0005103832,0.00027949343,0.006543464,0.00021867972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965432,0.002031546,0.00018914367,0.0003770278,0.0007696865,0.00008935833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028822733,0.00004655803,0.0002074014,0.006439804,0.0002667818,0.00011670651,0.0009674406,0.000029001487,0.00027281654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030218307,0.00002808783,0.000029674618,0.09051837,0.00010851907,0.00011302665,0.00080170133,0.00037744906,0.00001089359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039928986,0.001380441,0.87922305,0.000080503174,0.00002993301,0.0000040770806,0.00025354885,0.000003634361,0.009644613,0.002421822,0.012569451,0.094349004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010176476,0.00081172714,0.74572575,0.00032945204,0.000039624956,0.00000971095,0.0017952116,0.0065886974,0.008937571,0.12110894,0.113314845,0.00032081906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028509705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007825361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052171654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104851286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229000435","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0268110","title":"Becoming metrics literate: An analysis of brief videos that teach about the h-index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6494989492659259,"score_gpt":0.5132583067132458,"score_spread":0.1362406425526801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229000435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935934,0.0013229625,0.0013923028,0.00082557165,0.000105557745,0.00027875142,0.00020376027,0.00002378459,0.0022539282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962636,0.0001120661,0.0006661646,0.0003208692,0.000048777303,0.000038176935,0.000021537422,0.000013248093,0.0025155386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792405,0.0009083064,0.00081354403,0.0007821233,0.017697966,0.0005576109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886547,0.0067646774,0.00051231426,0.0017212747,0.0020379445,0.00030913658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03155644,0.00015228419,0.000667709,0.0950307,0.00080328784,0.001972265,0.0044824276,0.000061983206,0.0029246914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019704761,0.00009882273,0.0003157738,0.42788866,0.00014971444,0.000570671,0.0016603621,0.0005368689,0.000027123766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040796658,0.0022353847,0.9585936,0.000007128087,0.0008263625,0.000010580079,0.0011334207,0.0009069449,0.0017187766,0.00058969867,0.0012715954,0.032665733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051963987,0.0003709488,0.6665187,0.000006741202,0.0005553385,0.0000017622151,0.003463642,0.31787735,0.0038907472,0.0017046041,0.004811484,0.00027905963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048782892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005949091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33285797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014710627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229508554","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3735696","title":"Cite Unseen: Theory and Evidence on the Effect of Open Access on Cites to Academic Articles Across the Quality Spectrum","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"CITES; Quality (philosophy); Spectrum (functional analysis); Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.5981246267925501,"score_gpt":0.645494564475156,"score_spread":0.04736993768260589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229508554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.933993,0.0039529894,0.0014987999,0.059653264,0.00009112637,0.00053421035,0.000008292395,0.000008865625,0.00025947278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940936,0.003473754,0.0000039013375,0.0019662848,0.0001407161,0.000011438443,1.1303565e-7,0.000010537157,0.00029966832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98779374,0.0035452219,0.00076373003,0.0006183327,0.005316226,0.0019627647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545512,0.043511994,0.00047752995,0.00065994565,0.00042985653,0.00036945895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16569333,0.00018326465,0.00036373723,0.0030306089,0.00072312553,0.0053039934,0.009689429,0.00007516058,0.00010948143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11623944,0.0000746268,0.00014589535,0.054567304,0.00027927477,0.0010861852,0.0023933158,0.0026113186,0.00009537381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052079386,0.00007214678,0.26292297,0.000019271762,0.00017759399,0.000008608133,0.0028559978,0.0002930717,0.0067933933,0.27627125,0.0040936577,0.4412841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010220682,0.006491459,0.25277826,0.00016777661,0.000021600728,0.000050675193,0.0050611547,0.0005736655,0.027150827,0.70556825,0.0007971275,0.00031711176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008784801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008143973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44096696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021731632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005870501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230147137","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/1865/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Declaration; Impact factor; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7123738018518166,"score_gpt":0.5734078603725448,"score_spread":0.13896594147927188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230147137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11115871,0.058378268,0.52086174,0.22071198,0.0052615125,0.00045194433,0.000086014006,0.000032999622,0.083056815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95235074,0.016011102,0.004726129,0.00086454715,0.00043227285,0.0000017704946,0.0000058625637,0.000009164832,0.025598414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988251,0.00024380609,0.00077846495,0.0002022215,0.010312844,0.00021168058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494479,0.00076470146,0.00061551563,0.0003706265,0.048597936,0.00020333729],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012795755,0.00009166109,0.0003847997,0.002762999,0.00010672914,0.0015966826,0.0009735757,0.00004375701,0.0009996316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050021324,0.00006081318,0.00020673362,0.040373884,0.0000907884,0.0016876658,0.00020923313,0.00028609132,0.000111861176],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014735861,0.00011691951,0.003018226,0.000043209257,0.000029056684,0.00008294803,0.00019197026,0.000011567397,0.0062356465,0.039949987,0.12791401,0.82239175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041344183,0.0002971239,0.013973476,0.00041446797,0.000037942522,0.00027311663,0.001056229,0.00013903779,0.17886963,0.26090345,0.54336125,0.00026085338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000192207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004407016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.841192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003733366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097297307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230240615","doi":"10.13021/g8z883","title":"Report from the Participation in the Current System Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Incentive; Publishing; Public relations; Perception; Current (fluid); Political science; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7439589407594891,"score_gpt":0.6102823415491192,"score_spread":0.1336765992103699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230240615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94874376,0.0005641972,0.0009851318,0.01094453,0.00054448145,0.0012877556,0.000046594567,0.000022841657,0.036860693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.000055251276,0.0001788285,0.0004369884,0.0001838798,0.00029830576,0.0000034732075,0.000011004822,0.00017377597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893013,0.00061857747,0.0011253378,0.000984301,0.007332361,0.0006380786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982075,0.012384942,0.0007896838,0.00074671017,0.0037789496,0.00022471875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070705235,0.00018068745,0.00029609384,0.0043090186,0.00054410234,0.010346828,0.007128817,0.00008012036,0.00018981186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093914814,0.00006718758,0.00009545294,0.062702864,0.00019600835,0.004226074,0.0014891201,0.0006384184,0.00063262694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043561886,0.000097488475,0.8080908,0.0000025797365,0.000008901082,0.000020753178,0.0012422792,1.1131844e-7,0.00015139162,0.0069828453,0.007674095,0.17568521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049421587,0.000051134728,0.9353556,0.0001768055,0.000007699725,0.000009724978,0.0025636975,0.000048751317,0.00039541736,0.026669513,0.03408119,0.00014627495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077582554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043519372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17553893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026023458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020149752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230371363","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Publication; Reading (process); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230371363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717077,0.01827873,0.0014955433,0.0057188175,0.00068738085,0.0015693667,0.0001860795,0.000004875369,0.00035149188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502325,0.046633802,0.00025856227,0.000119379176,0.00004030059,0.0000064542596,0.0000027656426,0.000008250159,0.0026979572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693526,0.0011613932,0.0013021361,0.0004711577,0.009792772,0.0003372684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883975,0.0039644903,0.00094366114,0.0010204578,0.005002272,0.00022937241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03681172,0.000171314,0.00050991453,0.031532995,0.00009814205,0.0009625352,0.0021981562,0.00031625174,0.0013882758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10012481,0.00007426842,0.00024564206,0.0790663,0.00012802177,0.0005200671,0.002497757,0.0019723687,0.000039861134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005026222,0.00005933687,0.8791111,0.00008825957,0.000017809762,6.0394535e-7,0.00011536002,0.0005594336,0.00026211113,0.00001740957,0.048230186,0.07153337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000129646,0.000058025704,0.9869762,0.0006012236,0.000014564671,0.000021301847,0.000023976458,0.005824967,0.00006776397,0.0044234945,0.0017530449,0.00010576339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013756659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021448832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10786513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012540368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231107620","doi":"10.1139/cjc-2015-0198","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Chemistry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.7827645153528499,"score_gpt":0.6103038631569636,"score_spread":0.17246065219588624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231107620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742856,0.0005807703,0.0006237452,0.0014470979,0.0004942375,0.00009826148,0.000024502577,0.0000014811362,0.019301323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959288,0.0000044571693,0.0004269853,0.00010650937,0.0002429861,0.0000019367037,6.383849e-7,0.000007544112,0.0032801344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975846,0.00002877677,0.0004413934,0.00022489572,0.0013535322,0.00036680058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939322,0.00068680814,0.00026924792,0.00023787752,0.0025437933,0.0023300925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690344,0.0000809807,0.00023146521,0.0061517297,0.00015217297,0.008146718,0.003560109,0.00007915621,0.0001821471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032696713,0.000059283786,0.00005980758,0.014515631,0.00008361467,0.0013322666,0.00038077304,0.00019220795,0.0000038459543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011966663,0.000027094726,0.58491296,0.00006834696,0.00008183852,0.00025045904,0.0010040221,0.00021966292,0.006317638,0.000090434536,0.27324328,0.13366461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043799593,0.0002668485,0.13667887,0.00017289126,0.000034673736,0.000790331,0.0021994116,0.0022688298,0.08528417,0.0457971,0.7213697,0.0007572376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013789225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006605149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44823408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016786063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021411292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231511862","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v2","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Promotion (chess); Publication; Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Reading (process); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231511862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717077,0.01827873,0.0014955433,0.0057188175,0.00068738085,0.0015693667,0.0001860795,0.000004875369,0.00035149188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502325,0.046633802,0.00025856227,0.000119379176,0.00004030059,0.0000064542596,0.0000027656426,0.000008250159,0.0026979572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693526,0.0011613932,0.0013021361,0.0004711577,0.009792772,0.0003372684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883975,0.0039644903,0.00094366114,0.0010204578,0.005002272,0.00022937241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03681172,0.000171314,0.00050991453,0.031532995,0.00009814205,0.0009625352,0.0021981562,0.00031625174,0.0013882758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10012481,0.00007426842,0.00024564206,0.0790663,0.00012802177,0.0005200671,0.002497757,0.0019723687,0.000039861134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005026222,0.00005933687,0.8791111,0.00008825957,0.000017809762,6.0394535e-7,0.00011536002,0.0005594336,0.00026211113,0.00001740957,0.048230186,0.07153337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000129646,0.000058025704,0.9869762,0.0006012236,0.000014564671,0.000021301847,0.000023976458,0.005824967,0.00006776397,0.0044234945,0.0017530449,0.00010576339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013756659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021448832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10786513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012540368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231542139","doi":"10.3410/f.717968610.793468321","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.6925916288795719,"score_gpt":0.6689692607407867,"score_spread":0.023622368138785266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231542139","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023956003,0.0024844955,0.000088173816,0.07506155,0.003413192,0.0020734323,0.9167112,0.000011552627,0.00013243659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002518073,0.00048227888,0.00047717584,0.0003812153,0.00016914496,0.00013796627,0.9967733,0.000019395253,0.0013077399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97746694,0.0015452739,0.004481532,0.0013095165,0.014530097,0.0006666439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9096254,0.0023471324,0.008007381,0.004058068,0.07496303,0.0009989742],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028340207,0.00054441264,0.0018885853,0.021827832,0.00059661886,0.009939359,0.02043816,0.0007588069,0.0050521037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15670575,0.00029919832,0.0011224624,0.1314306,0.0009804622,0.004026922,0.0066348184,0.0014911165,0.00016864976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004338512,0.00073071156,0.00022698619,0.0010907724,0.00012626492,9.778233e-8,0.00007586221,6.42776e-7,0.000006822164,0.000093492024,0.97953194,0.018073022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010041491,0.0002781837,0.015137547,0.003467501,0.00009120424,0.00000725232,0.00008018747,0.00013461242,0.00004413861,0.0001587136,0.97930783,0.00028865668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005010167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029237863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12836553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030806562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020001398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231552299","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2014.7417042","title":"Crawling ResearchGate.net to Measure Student/Supervisor Collaboration","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; Crawling; Supervisor; Download; Computer science; Social network analysis; World Wide Web; Social network (sociolinguistics); Measure (data warehouse); Knowledge management; Data science; Social media; Management; Database","score_opus":0.6862926154229483,"score_gpt":0.6197131306743925,"score_spread":0.0665794847485558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231552299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4896357,0.002797721,0.16374688,0.095266216,0.0027412027,0.0035101015,0.0009358857,0.00043913955,0.24092714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901602,0.00040584055,0.0072846645,0.00064996287,0.00010491021,0.00010889825,0.00003975049,0.000016816433,0.0012289055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855595,0.002173019,0.0012266919,0.0010458406,0.008975592,0.0010193614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741355,0.0031055731,0.00034116383,0.0061849025,0.015031321,0.0012015175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024872528,0.00032179028,0.0005584468,0.008880858,0.0011672097,0.0062662135,0.013776754,0.00023215494,0.0005615583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029967923,0.00027024045,0.0001543001,0.09575039,0.0004180973,0.0011010724,0.003193375,0.00057507586,0.0044481615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014283562,0.0013502892,0.1520528,0.000017857486,0.00011517411,0.000005182774,0.0014684907,0.00060511276,0.0050139194,0.07648311,0.37485895,0.3878863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023620715,0.0009479846,0.17227419,0.00013195782,0.000047171234,0.000018273144,0.007858392,0.086764194,0.0010851322,0.05027614,0.6767516,0.0014828924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068898074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5005245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053884013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096626853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231624074","doi":"10.1063/1.4796786","title":"University Research Funding: More than Supporting the Best to Do the Best","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics Today","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Originality; Creativity; Productivity; Nothing; Public relations; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7204209821994506,"score_gpt":0.5745014316419546,"score_spread":0.14591955055749606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231624074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8663941,0.00039116797,0.001865813,0.03789299,0.0005843863,0.0007434888,0.000059292583,0.000029540304,0.09203922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790452,0.00011457027,0.00009765098,0.00021080501,0.0003558932,0.0000050895856,0.0000011236257,0.0000135048085,0.02015616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716986,0.0006266406,0.000371098,0.00074227905,0.009912617,0.0011775232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98658454,0.008540116,0.00015728909,0.0015313358,0.0027199797,0.00046674136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026751298,0.00015294799,0.00021577708,0.008871323,0.0020252177,0.0029876598,0.005574312,0.00006960069,0.00055299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01449074,0.000078916666,0.00018083077,0.17033641,0.00051519665,0.0005146832,0.0022158253,0.0007575366,0.0048130974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031788135,0.0007279933,0.19225362,0.0000075377293,0.00005179765,0.00007009691,0.007352733,0.00041139338,0.0012393137,0.036102265,0.22500847,0.536743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006286883,0.00062628556,0.04399517,0.00004210277,0.000026869839,0.0000123330765,0.06466932,0.018735955,0.0023998055,0.042356722,0.82585543,0.0006513469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003576953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028313825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60084695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017958283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010162962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231745346","doi":"10.3917/rsi.121.0072","title":"Dérives et effets pervers de l’évaluation quantitative de la recherche : sur les mauvais usages de la bibliométrie","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9500571617048811,"score_gpt":0.7054736319538845,"score_spread":0.24458352975099662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231745346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81479234,0.019493364,0.08932802,0.012201921,0.0007634671,0.0006892613,0.0001307433,0.0001446002,0.062456265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5408635,0.04814744,0.38462752,0.0007841051,0.00029185935,0.00010389527,0.0000278975,0.00014527203,0.025008537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8508586,0.13494186,0.0015048994,0.0017504652,0.008333644,0.0026105337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5984842,0.39095405,0.0008204749,0.0016065536,0.0053191683,0.002815548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45561922,0.0006063387,0.0008063754,0.057306353,0.0004114057,0.0043418515,0.0030700557,0.0040442706,0.0006014975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6317789,0.00055273564,0.00050047546,0.20287775,0.00198915,0.001899489,0.00092500256,0.00578503,0.00045542256],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000282254,0.00065513665,0.13713135,0.00011222371,0.00025673723,0.0001935198,0.040642817,0.0035089494,0.0046041664,0.009999652,0.06508622,0.73752695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004478782,0.0013568861,0.1261611,0.00045339734,0.0002203352,0.00026911858,0.044920456,0.09624757,0.010363669,0.19656536,0.5174044,0.0015589615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012518112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045508222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007316339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017496672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231996947","doi":"10.1037/cap0000178","title":"“Publishing excellence in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne”: Correction to Goghari (2019).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Excellence; Publishing; Library science; Applied psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4118619439686775,"score_gpt":0.5318201794958788,"score_spread":0.1199582355272013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231996947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.752744,0.0010275185,0.00019922412,0.057756342,0.036749467,0.0022036969,0.0008378389,0.00016343573,0.14831844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372533,0.00033055316,0.00066508004,0.04599187,0.00042048364,0.00021237087,0.00014753763,0.00014906678,0.014829751],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762055,0.0012702157,0.0027346886,0.0060911025,0.002659062,0.0110394135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712234,0.0025919664,0.00064484664,0.0062348507,0.0029303737,0.016374538],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03316769,0.0012256094,0.0016760125,0.109318756,0.00088508934,0.003282145,0.012968578,0.0018622868,0.0098980125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04362266,0.0012005683,0.0004647521,0.115661345,0.00070252724,0.0022508395,0.00048286284,0.0036401264,0.011711592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010332722,0.00010316082,0.29749048,0.0000048594625,0.000038967228,0.00086338806,0.0006192961,0.0001509031,0.00034151002,0.0007050396,0.5747987,0.12478038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013257447,0.00056089135,0.49130815,0.000045042245,0.000008522626,0.00023013011,0.00082395686,0.00024775596,0.000009645564,0.0029536306,0.50151944,0.0009671013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19381768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008523103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062306845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232697165","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/9sfm8","title":"Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grant funding; Political science; Principal (computer security); Public relations; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.934280920904689,"score_gpt":0.7001888630498099,"score_spread":0.23409205785487908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232697165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23459272,0.0048469496,0.1910587,0.12633456,0.0063128537,0.0076428354,0.0015558104,0.00038938216,0.42726618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554101,0.00040041775,0.022688676,0.0005871119,0.00085987156,0.00025758924,0.00004431322,0.000057726207,0.019694164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723134,0.00065909285,0.0012141576,0.0024632157,0.021961207,0.0013889198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959122,0.020736037,0.0018221248,0.002000384,0.0146050565,0.0017143735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054519717,0.00038650463,0.00081869174,0.061952874,0.00055532216,0.014737093,0.009333082,0.0006330873,0.0013781481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43385234,0.0002698839,0.00060937036,0.12275743,0.00026648873,0.00091978814,0.019610293,0.001867004,0.0006284949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000476425,0.00025328013,0.036322348,0.00024847608,0.0003878899,0.00011123746,0.002934893,0.00019664745,0.0007921505,0.010489266,0.4012933,0.54649407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192562,0.00094300014,0.038008608,0.00006369817,0.00005984282,0.000005045243,0.005788208,0.031895492,0.002119702,0.2902189,0.62852067,0.0011842775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033715507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011391575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7208174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005964207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028114142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233161158","doi":"10.3138/cpp.38.4.445","title":"Canadian Economics in Decline: Implications for Canada’s Economics Journals","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.5059169868946061,"score_gpt":0.5274507741167087,"score_spread":0.02153378722210264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233161158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1272485,0.014411775,0.000096994816,0.8055346,0.0044547548,0.00087641616,0.012284805,0.0000068563445,0.03508532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580331,0.0041796644,0.0004592034,0.018561937,0.0023300585,0.00008923086,0.00009567914,0.00005869991,0.016192455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915088,0.00020041723,0.0014348137,0.0007654721,0.0006609226,0.005429619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759957,0.002361874,0.00036332977,0.001199786,0.0019913616,0.018087944],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015031931,0.00036606437,0.0005910999,0.11600418,0.000998809,0.0047205864,0.00388589,0.0005151883,0.0014297094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0338051,0.00041125866,0.00022602905,0.06883431,0.00023067191,0.002253067,0.00028342198,0.0005538275,0.00023612524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001354202,0.000029966639,0.2625386,0.0000057968286,0.000025455987,0.000002383596,0.000060182392,0.00006421323,5.319765e-7,0.21630925,0.19683763,0.32412463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030042022,0.000016383527,0.26225457,0.000006204525,0.0000050857843,0.000040593597,0.00013451635,0.0011395336,0.0000026592961,0.014747751,0.72102666,0.00032563254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99990934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83078456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036088996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.318096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233559762","doi":"10.13021/g8vg6g","title":"Report from the \"What Is Open?\" Workgroup","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Openness to experience; Computer science; Publishing; Scholarship; World Wide Web; Open data; Point (geometry); Data science; Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.7550313351757388,"score_gpt":0.6000422360617933,"score_spread":0.15498909911394554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233559762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6926244,0.0018452135,0.0010988436,0.08818626,0.0014364455,0.0028696472,0.00022067502,0.000057637903,0.2116609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97771347,0.00068114966,0.0022535603,0.008009233,0.00024899162,0.00018471804,0.0000055819673,0.00003568152,0.010867621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867366,0.00028782975,0.0012612352,0.0019826537,0.008804256,0.0009274338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756877,0.01171688,0.0011637614,0.001361331,0.009365372,0.00070494483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059286885,0.00031862262,0.0005640626,0.005893182,0.0011629966,0.083035246,0.021813067,0.00020999518,0.0068282424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096738376,0.00014418019,0.00017304698,0.078559645,0.0004429643,0.029252406,0.01280492,0.0006867712,0.0031203534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012752209,0.00012591004,0.5856446,0.0000012456179,0.000060420385,0.000059327285,0.0010718174,1.3908602e-8,0.0014504349,0.0038596385,0.12255119,0.2850479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012287626,0.00013433184,0.4359305,0.00023506703,0.000014061852,0.000036001267,0.0039189076,0.000008931093,0.008840352,0.2264605,0.3227719,0.00042068402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018703232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020876178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28508908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023935639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004515089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233591935","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/798/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Originality; CLARITY; Audit; Publishing; Declaration; Peer review; Relevance (law); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Engineering; Law; Business","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233591935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552817,0.007734648,0.00045216363,0.012377996,0.00032206782,0.00018815047,0.00005026882,0.000016796823,0.023576234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96253616,0.011792516,0.00093312946,0.00070847553,0.000022281558,0.0000055434984,0.0000131399665,0.0000032122277,0.023985518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98921096,0.00009797026,0.00036289546,0.000788096,0.009058499,0.00048159485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.00022720553,0.00010443086,0.0005480936,0.0009377162,0.00050680415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009347989,0.00012350426,0.00020957642,0.002308425,0.0005579516,0.002159323,0.000946434,0.000045056528,0.0032460948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624935,0.00009096373,0.000049432678,0.0256282,0.001251975,0.0018211025,0.00081258244,0.00015239522,0.00035102275],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013652548,0.00011977299,0.018409403,0.000029286412,0.00000553088,0.00006369696,0.00030024024,0.000007238202,0.24367341,0.0054058204,0.00667732,0.72529465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025469455,0.00018514736,0.40457702,0.00006739638,0.000007690532,0.00018012198,0.0016171874,0.0007900272,0.15365069,0.0032553587,0.43505013,0.0003645357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014404596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029100855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035903577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031102137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233675618","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100169","title":"Co-authorship Networks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.7213854434291179,"score_gpt":0.5868499200491405,"score_spread":0.13453552337997743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233675618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014539833,0.00089882466,0.067531124,0.00042768737,0.0010276646,0.00022313309,0.000022002549,0.000059450853,0.92979556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016402569,0.00038966624,0.00044142047,0.00054599036,0.00066007994,0.0000036180772,0.000020950194,0.00004560863,0.9814901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814537,0.00012451944,0.0011058886,0.0013306416,0.015197132,0.0007880972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856178,0.0082284985,0.0004894503,0.001804841,0.0029448243,0.00091454305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035354093,0.00037545373,0.0007464575,0.088209115,0.00024211073,0.0039694095,0.0045215683,0.0009415984,0.03419974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014465989,0.00024106583,0.00047192164,0.031607483,0.00029187984,0.00014325329,0.0005715042,0.0010760687,0.016841685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064425462,0.0000064741976,0.0003918584,0.0000019052294,0.000015519216,0.000014049242,0.00000497366,0.000033152468,0.0000012167534,0.30420366,0.48688537,0.20843539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011185505,0.00008636848,0.00038096285,0.000010371542,0.000006127517,0.000005955097,0.0000031416514,0.0038937053,0.000007775852,0.124457955,0.87072814,0.00030763264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014875686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014662233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3838428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010636065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016409456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234099599","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-11332","title":"Government laboratories : institutional variety, change and design space","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Public policy; Space (punctuation); Public administration; Political science; Policy analysis; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5714277359918525,"score_gpt":0.5356221098501318,"score_spread":0.03580562614172067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234099599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5393385,0.015334617,0.041509192,0.006227228,0.024227161,0.0047350544,0.0012355647,0.00024718672,0.36714545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8329691,0.0030818284,0.020724878,0.00043505902,0.00090019946,0.00024662795,0.00016690427,0.0000507199,0.14142469],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984451,0.00012564885,0.0004773275,0.00084984914,0.013626294,0.00046987578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937342,0.0022059574,0.00028007678,0.00055147544,0.0027741548,0.00045415707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012349226,0.00024665875,0.00035002246,0.012280666,0.0004297906,0.0035379224,0.0012910961,0.00048685924,0.0016101201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022713926,0.00016628439,0.00007416389,0.07283341,0.00015427929,0.0007075054,0.00031042783,0.0006001223,0.00023400891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033079425,0.0004949048,0.030011369,0.00009269808,0.000114066905,0.000087755,0.002467185,0.0000067353667,0.0047089006,0.19397819,0.11054341,0.657164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006453941,0.00032008582,0.2707784,0.00003414835,0.000029586188,0.000010945626,0.0030379966,0.0015317042,0.008348135,0.0246638,0.6897658,0.0008340302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019203166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005824548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013648777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062027265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234159964","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v1","title":"Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Publication; Rank (graph theory); Reading (process); Metric (unit); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8697445551865972,"score_gpt":0.6837735840598732,"score_spread":0.185970971126724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234159964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717077,0.01827873,0.0014955433,0.0057188175,0.00068738085,0.0015693667,0.0001860795,0.000004875369,0.00035149188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502325,0.046633802,0.00025856227,0.000119379176,0.00004030059,0.0000064542596,0.0000027656426,0.000008250159,0.0026979572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693526,0.0011613932,0.0013021361,0.0004711577,0.009792772,0.0003372684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883975,0.0039644903,0.00094366114,0.0010204578,0.005002272,0.00022937241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03681172,0.000171314,0.00050991453,0.031532995,0.00009814205,0.0009625352,0.0021981562,0.00031625174,0.0013882758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10012481,0.00007426842,0.00024564206,0.0790663,0.00012802177,0.0005200671,0.002497757,0.0019723687,0.000039861134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005026222,0.00005933687,0.8791111,0.00008825957,0.000017809762,6.0394535e-7,0.00011536002,0.0005594336,0.00026211113,0.00001740957,0.048230186,0.07153337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000129646,0.000058025704,0.9869762,0.0006012236,0.000014564671,0.000021301847,0.000023976458,0.005824967,0.00006776397,0.0044234945,0.0017530449,0.00010576339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013756659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021448832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10786513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001876142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012540368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234189662","doi":"10.1002/asi.20880","title":"Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Normalization (sociology); Citation; Weighting; Computer science; Citation analysis; Factor (programming language); Field (mathematics); Citation impact; Discipline; Information retrieval; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics; Library science; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.32657725380462954,"score_gpt":0.5119929688617303,"score_spread":0.18541571505710075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234189662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520446,0.00022198255,0.029396757,0.01770973,0.00032746146,0.0001809829,0.000029881088,0.000007634373,0.000080963466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970457,0.00091966055,0.0010102775,0.0009105585,0.00006081862,0.0000030019125,1.8973272e-7,0.0000027665578,0.000047018766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922488,0.00007500657,0.0008125613,0.00012826711,0.006304288,0.00043107686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679394,0.0026844474,0.00253445,0.00033430487,0.007501177,0.00015169068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015175322,0.00011350404,0.00022254264,0.0054881265,0.003502267,0.0011890295,0.0034765124,0.00005840816,0.000017034421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020850388,0.00004212226,0.0003188631,0.06675902,0.00397756,0.0040474595,0.0003780067,0.0006843707,0.0000064889186],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009780682,0.000082490544,0.10500408,0.000004960155,0.00012871377,7.0435715e-7,0.008819265,0.00045739138,0.019147512,0.0010482842,0.18348764,0.68172115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015516072,0.0018263817,0.52625203,0.00002487265,0.00004332952,0.0031596264,0.0603164,0.05702914,0.006229599,0.013651215,0.32944673,0.00046907336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001700896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.5379877e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68125206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029150018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010178919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998478},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4234413400","doi":"10.1002/asi.20380","title":"What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Michigan; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Intersection (aeronautics); Attribution; Computer science; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10824341675705224,"score_gpt":0.4904801966060493,"score_spread":0.38223677984899707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234413400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532068,0.000040738323,0.0038946103,0.042128358,0.00043628734,0.00024563333,0.000009352301,0.000004103026,0.000034166864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975955,0.00007964912,0.0015447317,0.000734212,0.000024421724,0.000005313451,2.3190628e-7,0.0000011615701,0.000014813183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955196,0.000035858877,0.0007177486,0.00016558623,0.003298584,0.00026264376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880696,0.00048958097,0.0011021483,0.00028794404,0.009959627,0.00009111954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028940117,0.000064434375,0.00019199298,0.00958083,0.0006398121,0.0017511969,0.0016351712,0.00004091476,0.0000013285292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014282728,0.000029822082,0.00005896389,0.13025472,0.0042578904,0.007174744,0.00037838443,0.00016178406,3.8662236e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002486661,0.00022332658,0.087278076,0.000018290728,0.000028661649,4.816775e-7,0.036982197,0.00078109687,0.12814972,0.10316958,0.019240636,0.62387925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012133565,0.0019195882,0.15093672,0.000050926392,0.00002025589,0.00008586553,0.6094325,0.03589844,0.053638525,0.047526233,0.09902488,0.00025267625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005502456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016226749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6236266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023646212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000701276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234730809","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0020","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Sociology; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Social science; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234730809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61660606,0.030480098,0.0013427282,0.34306479,0.0061687473,0.00014370581,0.000026551439,0.0000110951405,0.002156243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737337,0.001601854,0.0032460766,0.002971091,0.016688844,0.0000020505709,7.3660703e-7,0.00001462127,0.0017410152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870357,0.00057628175,0.0010269821,0.00030002213,0.010651668,0.00040938304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810392,0.00837975,0.000982341,0.000651776,0.008506033,0.00044088953],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07506255,0.00012480674,0.00028721054,0.0075222063,0.0009200902,0.2350358,0.0054393015,0.0001372683,0.00031700914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816296,0.000052438296,0.00015423668,0.042812586,0.00019728128,0.10896567,0.0010693881,0.002130181,0.000050904677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565018,0.000023193257,0.11240533,9.71311e-7,0.000029718944,0.0000072503753,0.00077007763,0.000016606642,0.00024630307,0.00028115636,0.60025644,0.28594732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781936,0.000059240825,0.13892668,0.000026490916,0.000010973346,0.000069505244,0.0033402233,0.00027784734,0.000047675207,0.0045476067,0.85239273,0.00007319054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016265025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053020358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35712767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002990528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994177},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4235038322","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119v1","title":"The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Open science; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Gold standard (test); Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6436421491681436,"score_gpt":0.6585180130622761,"score_spread":0.014875863894132535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235038322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940372,0.0012870596,0.00083115377,0.00029432392,0.00009901095,0.0005175141,0.0007071463,0.0000018067176,0.0022247864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444455,0.0021933431,0.0001307795,0.0000056617987,0.0000044713206,0.000008857955,8.251627e-7,0.0000040721643,0.0032074477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180275,0.00042550275,0.0010282523,0.0006169519,0.0057802927,0.00034625552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861687,0.004919776,0.0018278111,0.0031046588,0.0038226494,0.00015644578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033087898,0.00014089957,0.0007326444,0.02040906,0.00026902818,0.006166421,0.020552507,0.00007913243,0.00039797055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024442911,0.0000533665,0.00055691553,0.091193594,0.00071868335,0.00063248136,0.03359208,0.00025348717,0.0000016676963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039166458,0.00010919444,0.9524899,0.000037202626,0.00044246766,2.576789e-7,0.00026968698,0.00096487976,0.0001985912,0.000056043827,0.0009141206,0.04447846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013112205,0.00004355663,0.94343776,0.000021855652,0.00013177775,1.5814517e-7,0.000077035846,0.039712068,0.0020686167,0.014239552,0.000071143644,0.000065372195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045747426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013632351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07078453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035422025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049556146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235676848","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101028","title":"Scientific Collaboration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7060668356314433,"score_gpt":0.5972501158053724,"score_spread":0.108816719826071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235676848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037454854,0.0005193973,0.0010677958,0.00059313036,0.0031133257,0.000290875,0.00010104591,0.00004524527,0.99389464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030525592,0.000061910665,0.0008040981,0.00010961955,0.0003728642,0.0000030359226,0.000028430837,0.000023730832,0.9955438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97912806,0.00004391803,0.0008462919,0.0013856026,0.018152678,0.0004434639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778738,0.0016790517,0.00041690213,0.001681355,0.017916901,0.0004319982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022857537,0.00023867868,0.00038838712,0.11494618,0.00051198516,0.01700544,0.0031076758,0.00039996504,0.091641545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017009085,0.00015800074,0.000196015,0.0818807,0.0007686897,0.0006251916,0.00092952384,0.00027738482,0.05232741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044628277,0.000010542764,0.000053686763,0.0000014589597,0.000008472426,0.0000058913784,0.000036671794,4.339443e-7,0.0000449784,0.098507956,0.8655682,0.035757232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007284554,0.00007198764,0.00006235129,0.000005937567,0.000003723466,0.0000017844177,0.00003383961,0.0002640123,0.000115277304,0.22030848,0.77889115,0.0001686097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004587111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007993746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121800534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017007701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079836865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235720082","doi":"10.37357/1068/journals/002","title":"REPA - Research and Education Promotion Association: Peer Review Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Peer review; Christian ministry; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Library science; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.8982135922640867,"score_gpt":0.7207287112971107,"score_spread":0.177484880966976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235720082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018880783,0.00630135,0.00026998768,0.79547715,0.00019028103,0.0006310058,0.000009620953,0.000036450398,0.17820337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50807744,0.016356694,0.0018667514,0.010286165,0.0013721341,0.000077340184,0.000023203153,0.000018708713,0.46192157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797599,0.00048719367,0.0005009016,0.0006277539,0.018211085,0.00041317684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96856743,0.0032549074,0.00021425322,0.00055375317,0.026642215,0.0007674671],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057831336,0.000072094095,0.00019743505,0.017461373,0.0002601822,0.001981417,0.0009097827,0.000081844766,0.0015410094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38130656,0.000048874077,0.000051014496,0.21573508,0.00006282828,0.0005740113,0.0005394456,0.00031365987,0.0011973288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021059607,0.00007327713,0.021486921,0.00003059961,0.0000029503135,5.3748516e-7,0.000056937224,6.6384395e-8,0.000070579736,0.0059541697,0.81330085,0.159021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011181392,0.00024263884,0.035733175,0.000038608825,0.0000022359682,0.0000030137924,0.00014082594,0.00033098907,0.00014842492,0.022097945,0.94106126,0.00008905581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001143314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047288972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025346823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008519009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235721262","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/726/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Presentation (obstetrics); Library science; Publishing; Audit; Originality; Declaration; Peer review; Relevance (law); Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Engineering; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235721262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552817,0.007734648,0.00045216363,0.012377996,0.00032206782,0.00018815047,0.00005026882,0.000016796823,0.023576234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96253616,0.011792516,0.00093312946,0.00070847553,0.000022281558,0.0000055434984,0.0000131399665,0.0000032122277,0.023985518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98921096,0.00009797026,0.00036289546,0.000788096,0.009058499,0.00048159485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.00022720553,0.00010443086,0.0005480936,0.0009377162,0.00050680415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009347989,0.00012350426,0.00020957642,0.002308425,0.0005579516,0.002159323,0.000946434,0.000045056528,0.0032460948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624935,0.00009096373,0.000049432678,0.0256282,0.001251975,0.0018211025,0.00081258244,0.00015239522,0.00035102275],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013652548,0.00011977299,0.018409403,0.000029286412,0.00000553088,0.00006369696,0.00030024024,0.000007238202,0.24367341,0.0054058204,0.00667732,0.72529465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025469455,0.00018514736,0.40457702,0.00006739638,0.000007690532,0.00018012198,0.0016171874,0.0007900272,0.15365069,0.0032553587,0.43505013,0.0003645357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014404596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029100855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035903577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031102137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235925410","doi":"10.1177/014107680609900907","title":"Open access: the evidence and the verdict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Information retrieval; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6452913179007194,"score_gpt":0.6034253860581266,"score_spread":0.041865931842592796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235925410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019874214,0.021439238,0.00047289935,0.97221076,0.0014844321,0.00045471685,0.000009781185,0.0000015538717,0.0019391661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07347194,0.00976404,0.00037436077,0.85941744,0.011127721,0.000011106474,0.0000016694339,0.000042449894,0.045789253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799602,0.0012977126,0.0016208328,0.00035762182,0.01634957,0.00041405347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96168125,0.030214492,0.003263099,0.0012424852,0.003474232,0.00012442241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08594397,0.00022987828,0.0010286565,0.0026563483,0.0005798145,0.002572508,0.026518548,0.0003160691,0.00042411868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0378262,0.00006353547,0.0008139804,0.033950485,0.0034569162,0.00056611386,0.0068468773,0.0030985954,0.0000062147656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036739966,0.00001394519,0.0026341036,0.000021736962,0.00010368511,0.0000075931584,0.00024539034,0.00006792937,0.000002582893,0.000016869553,0.9898563,0.006993141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020863079,0.00020711983,0.028649624,0.000626691,0.00017958102,0.00004507181,0.00040873708,0.0020081261,0.000015365677,0.013088852,0.952577,0.00010750782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011674056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076033393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112793334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013074088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052362285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249676","doi":"10.1108/ajim-03-2020-0089","title":"Investigating academic library responses to predatory publishing in the United States, Canada and Spanish-speaking Latin America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Library science; Scholarly communication; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.29358727861521944,"score_gpt":0.43077296768260404,"score_spread":0.1371856890673846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377544,0.0001471598,0.0055690934,0.053282317,0.00016131392,0.0002880865,0.000023835766,0.000009468491,0.0027643577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95642453,0.0004143061,0.0058190925,0.0371831,0.00007386723,0.0000035707897,0.00001315025,0.000005592665,0.00006278904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335504,0.00034269734,0.0011678028,0.000121046534,0.0047436,0.00026983125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608886,0.0020699603,0.00076617044,0.00017204741,0.0005462496,0.00035668424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009848689,0.00008846897,0.00015940206,0.015477386,0.00013381804,0.0045897984,0.0018329731,0.000034110493,0.0000439671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017030224,0.000055708162,0.00002754601,0.06278993,0.000039262595,0.0074574016,0.0006930882,0.0005415595,0.000009006297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851154,0.000013186654,0.17564316,0.000055284923,0.000033303575,0.000053369182,0.017779555,0.012345386,0.000013727468,0.0011094784,0.37199885,0.4208662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032369042,0.00009645214,0.24441698,0.00004258514,0.0000037040413,0.0000059603913,0.02351315,0.017707612,0.000020068563,0.00067394145,0.7131051,0.00009079647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063317483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052625063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42077538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008127184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002775443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236364825","doi":"10.18034/apjee.v4i1.511","title":"Visualizing Energy and Environment Research Productivity in Australia: A Scientometric Profile","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal of Energy and Environment","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Industry Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Data science; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.4677374971981015,"score_gpt":0.5176235935419135,"score_spread":0.04988609634381197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236364825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98719066,0.0039049839,0.0014112525,0.0023454973,0.000329668,0.00012951641,0.0000094543975,0.0000028356449,0.0046761516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848404,0.008359961,0.0006653626,0.000007676182,0.00013373936,0.000010822212,8.850932e-7,0.000012226251,0.005968923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899305,0.0006041691,0.00089568674,0.00084066985,0.0069221887,0.00080678484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642026,0.0011067415,0.00067715073,0.00093411875,0.0002377884,0.00062391395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030726116,0.0002129576,0.00047811482,0.02954042,0.0008415772,0.0018539008,0.0014429804,0.00015624499,0.00030675402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004747963,0.00015250505,0.00009952551,0.011923575,0.0011095717,0.0010803514,0.0012863554,0.00040459557,0.000018489529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019014678,0.0011007962,0.34488815,0.000015623547,0.00007029629,0.00031748365,0.00045148865,0.0002598647,0.0092690615,0.0059905793,0.0049357996,0.6325107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001449747,0.0011311278,0.71292984,0.00005351167,0.000015307929,0.00019947861,0.0014450324,0.0008567696,0.007683153,0.02012886,0.25370395,0.0004031844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024230147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022721439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63210756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002797185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008140315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236943233","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0060","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Scholarly communication; Public relations; Open data; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236943233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031478,0.0008432237,0.011257841,0.05635061,0.0027467313,0.0012268085,0.00021950314,0.00006039547,0.024147091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410326,0.00004407036,0.053104833,0.0033855084,0.00066492177,0.00001397742,0.000028940018,0.000035115085,0.0016900473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697313,0.0014735789,0.0034139366,0.0016570351,0.022308877,0.0014153286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8700938,0.011779959,0.004140586,0.0026766113,0.107819885,0.0034891136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24006544,0.00038823235,0.00092715997,0.06397784,0.0018143994,0.7975296,0.022871837,0.00061908783,0.0008636441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.731846,0.0002925379,0.0005819236,0.13397464,0.00022777758,0.6333806,0.0014946999,0.0042716553,0.00007658113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507036,0.0017334599,0.33707026,0.0000143736,0.00005683543,0.000054849035,0.00036570887,0.0000817928,0.008262666,0.0077905273,0.20937258,0.4346899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066955914,0.0022925637,0.51166034,0.00014893725,0.00004520527,0.00013505995,0.002146121,0.0022565026,0.0010627592,0.17529158,0.29759875,0.00066659687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104976316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030312673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49178052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047434024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237345702","doi":"10.1177/0959354319829250","title":"Peer review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Peer review; Psychology; Editorial board; Function (biology); Sociology; Social psychology; Library science; Political science; Personality; Computer science; Big Five personality traits; Law","score_opus":0.6929366523509854,"score_gpt":0.6827199836591633,"score_spread":0.01021666869182214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237345702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111089475,0.021275507,0.0023566969,0.038398724,0.0027356392,0.00048923446,0.000014485958,0.00004933242,0.8235909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636576,0.0041274,0.00039283346,0.022378162,0.00012870804,0.000014879264,0.0000059165213,0.00001823711,0.3363579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043006,0.00084839005,0.000543465,0.0007420744,0.0069193733,0.0005166522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991135,0.0035605677,0.00016006708,0.0015854,0.0033329872,0.00022598788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.074857056,0.00010960766,0.00035090634,0.015546161,0.000063779764,0.0002705438,0.0027172768,0.000102984224,0.036946718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03914699,0.00006937775,0.00015126131,0.07577085,0.00015467845,0.00020279571,0.00034066578,0.00028032975,0.04940509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031054897,0.00007256294,0.011850382,0.000011236121,0.000009531106,0.000007625731,0.000032708525,4.5158635e-7,0.0004667566,0.039581522,0.62305355,0.32488266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022687155,0.00011473589,0.032755066,0.000016484375,0.0000029925006,0.000021470974,0.000028747225,0.000010759978,0.000024885858,0.1980497,0.76865613,0.000092135095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002322323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5431e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5254865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021081067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048002596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237798851","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/e3z4v","title":"A Breeding Pool of Ideas: Analyzing Interdisciplinary Collaborations at the Complex Systems Summer School","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Santa Fe Institute","keywords":"Homophily; Preference; Discipline; Composition (language); Baseline (sea); Prestige; Behavioural sciences; Test (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.6962939317788974,"score_gpt":0.5846079667937756,"score_spread":0.11168596498512184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237798851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68465984,0.01180314,0.12233247,0.06335797,0.0070375013,0.005498737,0.0028593342,0.0002399059,0.10221111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311143,0.00014888356,0.0006081148,0.00012719195,0.00026163735,0.00006463896,0.000052833166,0.000022943104,0.005602321],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854454,0.00063438877,0.001971116,0.0013436059,0.010024347,0.0005811802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98286927,0.0062281685,0.0011455592,0.0018878583,0.007209136,0.00066002214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018232873,0.00033240355,0.0009266564,0.036232557,0.000725428,0.0053340336,0.0057075564,0.00027961016,0.002442082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029065525,0.00018683013,0.0004522762,0.17000568,0.0003757731,0.00034197382,0.025221476,0.00091977126,0.00069824007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075699,0.00016154087,0.14736238,0.00017449842,0.00037519564,0.000028609544,0.00089102617,0.011227182,0.007407283,0.005456083,0.82155204,0.005288478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011333356,0.0004611744,0.17987403,0.00041878148,0.00019228418,0.00003249415,0.02889438,0.72017145,0.000954674,0.033549216,0.032921705,0.0013964736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005634174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021674935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7886303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000465935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084478664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238210221","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/64u3s","title":"Publication by association: the Covid-19 pandemic reveals relationships between authors and editors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Promotion (chess); Publishing; Politics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Hydroxychloroquine; Productivity; Law; Economics; Virology; Medicine; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8162678095354845,"score_gpt":0.6003339535934432,"score_spread":0.2159338559420413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238210221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07156406,0.0023625356,0.06788241,0.8281172,0.0068530305,0.002511527,0.0017306326,0.00042123083,0.01855741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953921,0.00061697845,0.0008629193,0.0024942567,0.0036493912,0.0001218502,0.0003745981,0.000027589942,0.037931405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98118526,0.002408014,0.001549637,0.0015487479,0.0127349505,0.0005733807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93294394,0.056695726,0.0019409396,0.0016396827,0.0048952103,0.0018845074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09610874,0.00025752393,0.00051932235,0.01755143,0.000979671,0.008562671,0.0036005923,0.00093630096,0.00056925777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4997795,0.00015512537,0.00018546727,0.09134502,0.00017046316,0.00048244363,0.0033654673,0.0024221372,0.00040718095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012202189,0.0000062193058,0.48048022,0.000004699369,0.000019028428,1.6823161e-7,0.0001349383,0.0000042571082,0.0000041284457,0.00029892664,0.51681244,0.0022337409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015616266,0.000022231745,0.2807418,0.0000030274814,0.000025365254,0.0000011474696,0.00030690175,0.00073241367,0.0000037318741,0.083045535,0.63475114,0.00021049105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026382378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014135637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88235694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009493208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008615197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238323347","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.23847.1","title":"Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Biology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8832433222443591,"score_gpt":0.6842037583971189,"score_spread":0.1990395638472402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238323347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7886504,0.038230333,0.059958637,0.07745979,0.0023913824,0.015043495,0.01282768,0.00015378578,0.005284499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883737,0.0033685858,0.0048581623,0.00016744788,0.0005304371,0.0005973293,0.00031889253,0.00005663552,0.0017288233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98153406,0.0013230578,0.0018974699,0.0014339214,0.012977438,0.00083406974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94014263,0.035282504,0.0014329024,0.0019011453,0.020629995,0.00061083253],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036559265,0.000313212,0.000848586,0.047691997,0.0005388927,0.008624083,0.006038772,0.00042760835,0.0003759407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27343825,0.00019235504,0.0003635006,0.13649327,0.0007254856,0.0006300231,0.004913454,0.0015390591,0.000056674657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005735927,0.00040734917,0.09739839,0.00027316783,0.0007246057,0.000016052292,0.00379407,0.00017974933,0.011107674,0.0042263204,0.49287808,0.38842094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004582411,0.0012001983,0.3330686,0.0004484396,0.00022707378,0.000007923645,0.006456264,0.2297846,0.012842824,0.28174803,0.12827003,0.001363587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017577559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059273854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38705736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019505814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022372357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238369703","doi":"10.5172/mra.2012.3154","title":"Triangulation in Canadian Doctoral Dissertations on Aging","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Project commissioning; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Geography; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.906773239166878,"score_gpt":0.6609234335670342,"score_spread":0.24584980559984382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238369703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882849,0.0004233707,0.0004894973,0.004377434,0.00086176005,0.00017565444,0.000018966237,0.000003063252,0.0053653657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801403,0.00003786598,0.0009678254,0.000029550833,0.00054752326,0.000007495325,0.000006357478,0.000008837495,0.00038053904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869763,0.0006820618,0.00081418606,0.00022353345,0.010478784,0.0008250848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98761237,0.006999013,0.00024687388,0.00024270173,0.00395589,0.00094313273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04812822,0.00009376166,0.00019533021,0.06818892,0.0001553572,0.0011738412,0.0021806455,0.000081757535,0.00023148303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072754696,0.000066801666,0.000136636,0.027273105,0.00011133424,0.0012671606,0.00015382373,0.0006921232,0.00014174203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102946135,0.00029485548,0.88417596,0.0000011888283,0.000026675,0.000030762498,0.00083010906,0.00083862257,0.00025718487,0.0033381875,0.0013830512,0.10872045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009341092,0.00009790828,0.96445024,0.000027137812,0.0000012471637,0.000023690844,0.0020807118,0.013513504,0.00094446563,0.0024670544,0.015362805,0.000097101576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019362643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023668125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10862335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009591395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069926184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238376992","doi":"10.1017/s1049096515000608","title":"Members among New Andrew Carnegie Fellows","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; University of Toronto; International Council for Canadian Studies; University of Cambridge; Colorado College","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.6273068520243841,"score_gpt":0.5854620116359598,"score_spread":0.04184484038842429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238376992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6957066,0.00019117145,0.0020900145,0.0068886927,0.0017723762,0.0002985112,0.000040072882,0.00010119893,0.29291138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799218,0.000008474879,0.0016855708,0.0010806319,0.00063541793,0.000004850717,0.0000020146267,0.00001873725,0.016642468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97381604,0.00022015272,0.0010072378,0.0013763059,0.018971225,0.004609061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97699904,0.0029940896,0.00019252943,0.0016118975,0.0047647003,0.013437749],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020418463,0.0003088745,0.0005043392,0.022598056,0.000593359,0.0050689266,0.0056796577,0.00019623515,0.0005684291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123917036,0.00022137951,0.00021623564,0.094179876,0.0044020554,0.0018663808,0.0017018851,0.00052187016,0.0015459158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057896154,0.00013117309,0.124032564,0.0000030023307,0.0000060753923,0.000052462965,0.00038596615,0.000056481687,0.000146716,0.83023626,0.03921158,0.0057319445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012484958,0.000495004,0.12960309,0.000019399191,0.000026973925,0.00010051197,0.0041444097,0.022535868,0.0048753116,0.6824675,0.15354414,0.000939277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009089681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009547821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28421524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014323492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060366173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238935763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.375","title":"Making International Journals Truly International","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Library science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.6847718273091886,"score_gpt":0.6094118758696567,"score_spread":0.07535995143953189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238935763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7762961,0.00065690686,0.011698289,0.07954931,0.032028705,0.00009331606,0.000032790518,0.000020351767,0.09962427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782852,0.00013017292,0.015670724,0.0010112231,0.003331182,8.290042e-7,0.0000014253874,0.000015421832,0.0015538448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730369,0.00022665733,0.0020432689,0.00040281095,0.023804616,0.00048578563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95498395,0.0032359492,0.0024844245,0.0005477951,0.038029272,0.0007186336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09646759,0.00015541071,0.00034883848,0.06956657,0.00030069266,0.28181142,0.0121103255,0.00028863986,0.0046653673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39457837,0.000107917396,0.00039768388,0.040745843,0.000102116275,0.14019759,0.0012795631,0.004879846,0.000106879095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063729305,0.00015818508,0.4488392,0.0000010751438,0.00010744236,0.00016278848,0.00024514852,0.0000407197,0.01904996,0.0043283277,0.1048709,0.42213252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009954947,0.00007969975,0.28476486,0.00004291955,0.000008799839,0.0010524464,0.0007552838,0.0011804498,0.00045383372,0.032163773,0.6783198,0.000182613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012030536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001110586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5734489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020357218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053774915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99741596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238937955","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1040593","title":"Medical research, the media and open access","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Multimedia; Information retrieval; Medicine","score_opus":0.6234387423150167,"score_gpt":0.6174097825181646,"score_spread":0.00602895979685214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238937955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007329958,0.0019526111,0.000045102464,0.9795424,0.0030984734,0.00034882186,0.00012180302,0.000006963431,0.014150848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003997026,0.006391987,0.00003511631,0.9648616,0.018173058,0.000028232893,0.00003547111,0.0000424154,0.006435117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89782065,0.0043394947,0.0015775457,0.00091476965,0.09310643,0.0022411349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9253246,0.049286053,0.000951635,0.0009828892,0.014923177,0.008531646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24003175,0.00027707874,0.0007252078,0.043743484,0.0021690577,0.044909704,0.029294027,0.0032806175,0.03448971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59104633,0.00015438555,0.00021478471,0.09358402,0.00077060214,0.001485771,0.0042978516,0.019966783,0.0011240925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017422351,0.000009591303,0.0053295987,0.0000033219194,0.00004349036,0.0038883141,0.00012559169,2.2099348e-7,2.0832713e-8,0.0001891432,0.87282604,0.117582925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053505873,0.000034280834,0.011236312,0.00013084021,0.0000069068124,0.000667312,0.00017479922,0.00009455576,3.9300136e-7,0.037999883,0.94893396,0.00018568555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028334228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0882834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35101458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003318276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048487738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239199063","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.75","title":"British Scholarly Journals on Film Studies: Study and Evaluation of Their Internationality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.80514527235736,"score_gpt":0.6173760173108069,"score_spread":0.18776925504655306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239199063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96944046,0.024814801,0.00019573314,0.0022542467,0.0014349621,0.00025815537,0.000018378752,0.0000044125077,0.0015788799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980055,0.0007321485,0.0004376861,0.00021923389,0.00046712678,0.0000033685812,5.735754e-7,0.0000107349115,0.0001235951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96194685,0.0025497728,0.0024019897,0.00039587563,0.03219545,0.00051004434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131318,0.007336882,0.0027258,0.0005080059,0.075553134,0.0007444159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.355226,0.00015614853,0.00059455127,0.030235082,0.0002985372,0.109922774,0.0028698924,0.00015361236,0.0005302907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4738052,0.00010984246,0.00021149285,0.03836982,0.00011657833,0.16189119,0.00083941297,0.00208535,0.0000072201897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003606735,0.00067459635,0.7336629,0.0000042687398,0.00019812818,0.0000067149326,0.0019602296,0.00004112444,0.0002966796,0.0001252843,0.010661916,0.25233206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016354255,0.00052646425,0.9649578,0.00013951202,0.00004970013,0.00013674717,0.019070873,0.00034256163,0.00016026811,0.01022969,0.0026299201,0.00012103561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008561598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002302556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25221103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043431923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041524763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239243730","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.417","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239243730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699977,0.1962802,0.0017188931,0.52436215,0.0007604956,0.00049497135,0.000015372108,0.000005700366,0.0063645327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79511714,0.17105702,0.020031953,0.004182219,0.0013785835,0.000015637059,0.000001803535,0.00003797749,0.0081776455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852496,0.0025671704,0.0032985369,0.00067155884,0.053747125,0.0011906603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391637,0.055198006,0.003516924,0.0009978546,0.19895501,0.0021685248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52565306,0.00014143737,0.0006261439,0.07942668,0.0006744935,0.06170676,0.004984965,0.00032127413,0.00011003857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.91775274,0.000094515955,0.00020577176,0.13212532,0.00019543666,0.14717522,0.00094116887,0.007937505,0.000015508258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009224216,0.0001256871,0.0781688,0.000042058495,0.000022074819,0.0002451479,0.0007390864,0.0000072099515,0.0004197471,0.0005883337,0.75155413,0.16799548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011091044,0.00035033637,0.20734921,0.0005675555,0.000010340367,0.0028863966,0.0011337817,0.0001572004,0.000054384567,0.017463572,0.7687802,0.00013796805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000726848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037335158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239809893","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672v2","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Community engagement; Public relations; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239809893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76012987,0.0006947,0.004638785,0.013138427,0.0023844033,0.0019956345,0.00026903258,0.00012284126,0.21662632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659306,0.00076065166,0.005329396,0.00066851,0.0009959363,0.000120761404,0.00005287859,0.000051079864,0.026090194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692598,0.0016403924,0.0017806817,0.0023394988,0.023144927,0.0018346995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829185,0.006796824,0.00046959857,0.0026646827,0.006275056,0.0008753624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503571,0.00044570546,0.0008543866,0.14316624,0.000335204,0.005920706,0.008752621,0.0008029101,0.0075698006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12709473,0.00032156953,0.0005106996,0.19830608,0.0005212522,0.0003108103,0.016812196,0.002282651,0.0022645004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022364213,0.0014783752,0.07378055,0.000109728804,0.00018652376,0.00013595307,0.0021336,0.0010577084,0.00064622576,0.010726617,0.67228156,0.23723951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002147948,0.0005423775,0.41984627,0.00010848132,0.000015069958,0.0000039108904,0.0018384699,0.027426451,0.0011701809,0.37001437,0.17539808,0.0014884032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012298875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49688348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011111915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239859146","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34902-7","title":"Paramétrage «scientifique»","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Medicine; Statistics; Demography; Library science; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3265938285661998,"score_gpt":0.4248330964618912,"score_spread":0.09823926789569143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239859146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6189366,0.17701322,0.0015464362,0.002488822,0.16843967,0.0002520454,0.00012634991,0.000004064624,0.031192765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793498,0.003630752,0.0027284496,0.0004555349,0.00006523517,0.0000012143539,6.3431423e-7,0.000015666064,0.013752725],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991072,0.00048788954,0.0016412082,0.00049835554,0.0052813045,0.0010192303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711002,0.01894384,0.0013142938,0.00046898078,0.0066093565,0.0015633396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013494978,0.0002525327,0.00071643695,0.024114244,0.0003334433,0.00072457746,0.0020416956,0.00035947378,0.007614132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12428949,0.00019733924,0.00020057008,0.068099245,0.00060281716,0.00068060606,0.0005043119,0.00097006984,0.000026501377],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000426597,0.00025444178,0.14576663,0.000029218725,0.000091096066,0.0064486535,0.00027595766,0.0000102560425,0.0000071860613,0.0030634752,0.040337924,0.8037109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012841327,0.0006996428,0.5722978,0.0000114324475,0.000069952526,0.00024396015,0.0008197279,0.00059373945,0.00022303837,0.008023742,0.41542155,0.00031127938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071796715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04085645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8033996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001387684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239948371","doi":"10.3410/f.736643922.793566195","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Elite; The Internet; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.3255912552692925,"score_gpt":0.5488515034425209,"score_spread":0.22326024817322837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239948371","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001721754,0.0010883173,0.0004933992,0.21949269,0.0018327966,0.002357782,0.7746133,0.000010119148,0.00009438567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003345909,0.00015151211,0.0009850127,0.0023096558,0.00022309025,0.00021147655,0.9946361,0.000015707463,0.001132859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796423,0.0007178093,0.0029104312,0.0014244396,0.014645609,0.0006594269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91936356,0.003950856,0.0038394,0.004424276,0.06769234,0.00072955486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031676445,0.00043964933,0.0011482338,0.0141212465,0.0005567631,0.0024046325,0.012586169,0.0006449908,0.00048802912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3076021,0.00022173426,0.000819317,0.12091804,0.0010587153,0.0018304517,0.0026038487,0.0010506398,0.0001455699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002347625,0.00012992433,0.00019059659,0.0006995811,0.000048844042,3.9602746e-8,0.00011260999,6.9362585e-7,0.000015996311,0.0012265863,0.9901573,0.00739435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045034717,0.0002245976,0.019378494,0.0023620403,0.000063118045,0.000004801175,0.00018433428,0.00009059692,0.00006774349,0.0005931603,0.97634184,0.00023893712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072125037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017232413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27592564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046669904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002904241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239970099","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.61","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239970099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98414063,0.004373451,0.0012158346,0.0061941138,0.00067504257,0.00016878065,0.000010540077,0.0000045936804,0.0032170024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950859,0.000057780773,0.0016542295,0.0012587961,0.001856829,0.0000034738312,4.3492398e-7,0.000007798183,0.00007474462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889376,0.0003226789,0.0010943175,0.0002307876,0.008581516,0.00083310955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805934,0.0072194533,0.0011186053,0.00014224091,0.0033088753,0.00015149248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19473776,0.00012427499,0.00031246076,0.030271608,0.0013794876,0.12705326,0.0036175349,0.00018834474,0.00002451642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0945478,0.00006624651,0.00020460365,0.029605202,0.0003009613,0.10178787,0.00045716987,0.002191873,0.0000020322025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067013,0.000048995593,0.89017755,0.000010083864,0.000016929336,0.0000049256737,0.0070512705,0.000011444059,0.0005374215,0.0065654903,0.040308416,0.055236794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011421485,0.00037192833,0.8520878,0.000076195814,0.0000187212,0.00027057467,0.030959884,0.0005144723,0.00010682985,0.023537464,0.090694286,0.00021970997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004955195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005375439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019034697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032036824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239988074","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2015-0190","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.7915560477371818,"score_gpt":0.6177842220609052,"score_spread":0.17377182567627658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239988074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8249131,0.0024523442,0.09323866,0.04397122,0.0050590443,0.0022869075,0.00022319454,0.00006993993,0.027785618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957855,0.00003364794,0.0013219352,0.0007071741,0.00033831171,0.000013590176,0.0000013682255,0.000015627895,0.0017828445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995671,0.00012970039,0.000543488,0.0004790364,0.002373271,0.0008035455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185586,0.001266723,0.00016798616,0.00040466158,0.0021974007,0.0041073756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022774275,0.00012518362,0.00028407745,0.025236376,0.00054184336,0.022439225,0.0055519775,0.00016767035,0.00014261034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052985463,0.00008775254,0.000086249296,0.035634868,0.000112312715,0.0021866076,0.0015333489,0.0005263626,0.000033448796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010792949,0.00003956196,0.072922386,0.000010654289,0.00004542383,0.00031923878,0.0002123441,0.0016990321,0.00012253915,0.0024203958,0.33160773,0.5904927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018228417,0.00035743963,0.14774872,0.0000662721,0.000015725322,0.0007820209,0.00024404071,0.032729253,0.00018586588,0.1267267,0.6888345,0.0004866025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011369457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005366664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5900062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003893738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014505647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240097269","doi":"10.1177/117863290800100001","title":"Open access and the Science of Perpetual Change: Developing an Integrative Perspective of Health Services Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Services Insights","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.7928972937548148,"score_gpt":0.6916984100595053,"score_spread":0.1011988836953095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240097269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97472227,0.011603267,0.00013562007,0.006992775,0.0002790897,0.002079334,0.00003152844,0.000014128949,0.0041419994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041706,0.0067783045,0.0011607512,0.0014345495,0.00006418286,0.00005461674,0.0000035141318,0.0000117208365,0.000075295844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98323303,0.0025935324,0.001456162,0.0013119836,0.010362763,0.0010425256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97999805,0.0040459023,0.0011871896,0.0012192304,0.012918689,0.00063094095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057132073,0.00021418941,0.00093207386,0.02798886,0.002962913,0.0024231279,0.013143233,0.000082469574,0.00004384817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011886224,0.00011161766,0.00005839802,0.14954485,0.0032603135,0.0060718246,0.007956106,0.000496942,0.000010582609],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005769162,0.00051442435,0.019455146,0.0007353719,0.00003547614,0.000008228054,0.70400566,0.000009742937,0.00011914229,0.21378452,0.00021191423,0.06054345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032197977,0.002070386,0.44331035,0.0011520048,0.0000040678074,0.000043254935,0.41053182,0.012915523,0.0030667915,0.11909678,0.004139302,0.00044994772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07396391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077892016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4238552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045905844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049856873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240148342","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2009.10765249","title":"Mapping the Structure of Research: Business and Management as an Exemplar","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Serials Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Constructive; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Index (typography); Citation index; Visualization; Process (computing); Bibliometrics; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7418286327358953,"score_gpt":0.6186366955080745,"score_spread":0.12319193722782074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240148342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6745381,0.2932007,0.00020973304,0.018948672,0.000557806,0.0026575886,0.00004533946,0.000025002186,0.00981706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6537655,0.3433561,0.0009893622,0.0011295427,0.00012245087,0.00000534844,0.0000044467693,0.000007296495,0.000619928],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99150145,0.0009995946,0.00070280547,0.000505086,0.005896191,0.00039488627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945059,0.0012719479,0.00022033256,0.0010786825,0.00273119,0.00019197793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038135603,0.0001072281,0.00042626244,0.010985197,0.00026923005,0.00088654645,0.0019961006,0.00005224524,0.0006585911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017465884,0.000053267384,0.000055921104,0.13657904,0.00019195602,0.00037537195,0.00049374683,0.00015640113,0.00006181548],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014940033,0.00005971461,0.0003480503,0.0006664453,0.000014848312,0.000016859467,0.000114710696,0.0000021330786,0.005449293,0.010775163,0.019692672,0.96284515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035770255,0.00028340617,0.16319488,0.0016074996,0.000018243789,0.00003994488,0.00054833695,0.000029611683,0.0016069687,0.1339334,0.6981431,0.00023687123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000418785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064583187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002132136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007150072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240264479","doi":"10.13021/g87k5j","title":"Impact Factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Openness to experience; Visibility; Quality (philosophy); Key (lock); Scholarship; Publishing; Public relations; Tracking (education); Political science; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Computer security; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Geography","score_opus":0.8111945142120909,"score_gpt":0.6407476752294909,"score_spread":0.17044683898259994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240264479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991832,0.00006202721,0.0004310952,0.001394406,0.00019510035,0.00047569643,0.000094466406,0.000035274705,0.09812872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955182,0.000045923058,0.0006152023,0.000250281,0.00007481825,0.000032523167,0.0000017180284,0.000024577628,0.0034367677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896764,0.00014507836,0.0007496783,0.0011686814,0.007326072,0.00093409145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849969,0.0047933394,0.0005097207,0.00047282316,0.0083210915,0.0009061252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027097462,0.00028456104,0.0004707856,0.0214048,0.00051400345,0.013401992,0.007626103,0.00016816852,0.0054827877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13285442,0.00013129291,0.00022777735,0.08940878,0.00024555667,0.011336456,0.002897333,0.00041270815,0.002350597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004926172,0.0000869276,0.9404838,0.000001197523,0.00002461929,0.0000034709192,0.00025289686,3.1314666e-8,0.005597871,0.0033842588,0.008447339,0.041668303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072864455,0.00033655085,0.9196638,0.000032593136,0.00000417416,0.000005262554,0.00049612665,0.00000561757,0.009983885,0.056309283,0.012154853,0.00027924738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000326451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034322163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10575696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037474846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034596035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240327873","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.001","title":"Stakeholders, Service, and the Future of University Press Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Stakeholder; Order (exchange); Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Revenue; Sociology; Business; Entrepreneurship; Stakeholder theory; Management; Marketing; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.49361089594369123,"score_gpt":0.43763194929906707,"score_spread":0.05597894664462416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240327873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8862443,0.02396759,0.0016830286,0.06799598,0.002429228,0.000201525,0.000041531734,0.000010261873,0.017426575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951451,0.0009069148,0.0017770774,0.0006104357,0.0009043894,1.706815e-7,8.270875e-7,0.000008664475,0.0006464155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593205,0.001240772,0.0009735744,0.00024603837,0.011064327,0.000543207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733874,0.008315416,0.0020670218,0.0006641029,0.020695373,0.00091933314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14140385,0.00012461263,0.00042250258,0.018589593,0.00037970397,0.11185156,0.0052905153,0.00023755188,0.00006294014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10262732,0.00006862278,0.00019133349,0.061387155,0.00018683952,0.23768076,0.0013984307,0.0021981557,0.0000020169985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006306683,0.00024683072,0.50184697,0.00003618073,0.00016839695,0.000024608022,0.0040769614,0.000038899638,0.00037351495,0.064438656,0.23015364,0.19796465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003091909,0.0000712063,0.27106383,0.000038568796,0.00004061536,0.00012609195,0.022101784,0.00028000952,0.000107318316,0.003100148,0.6998289,0.00014961073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023405302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014215664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46967527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011285224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002831332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99253386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240546189","doi":"10.1007/s11192-006-0097-x","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Macro; Data science; Citation analysis; Computer science; Scientometrics; Epistemology; Sociology; Management science; Social science; Library science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240546189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6951882,0.0019262349,0.03157675,0.0012007128,0.0024349948,0.0003681535,0.00005389798,0.0001569882,0.26709408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545873,0.000030979187,0.0035014146,0.0001367848,0.00021210685,0.00000808466,0.0000057769366,0.00001446763,0.041503105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709998,0.00018438775,0.0009194348,0.0011601938,0.025572687,0.0011635032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98823357,0.004107932,0.0003108647,0.0013859835,0.005362674,0.0005989694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04056021,0.00019610455,0.0003215265,0.23710883,0.00045066926,0.005520524,0.004318613,0.00013791367,0.0013559798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063997105,0.00013755019,0.00021930598,0.7174109,0.00030948242,0.00095442066,0.0010133083,0.0002797748,0.004211696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010506521,0.0004090271,0.4820734,0.0000040695045,0.000006513895,0.000026811887,0.00004762019,0.00051724486,0.0019988555,0.023244454,0.30456445,0.18709704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004197239,0.00009214846,0.51089877,0.0000020891785,0.0000035159821,0.00001031488,0.000073439034,0.0044533517,0.002418191,0.030205755,0.45114565,0.00027702568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018243773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001985051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4803021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022680432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022269871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240741669","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.2.7","title":"Preface","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Interpretation (philosophy); Citation; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Macro; Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6899883062376743,"score_gpt":0.6221987966117799,"score_spread":0.06778950962589436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240741669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6951882,0.0019262349,0.03157675,0.0012007128,0.0024349948,0.0003681535,0.00005389798,0.0001569882,0.26709408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545873,0.000030979187,0.0035014146,0.0001367848,0.00021210685,0.00000808466,0.0000057769366,0.00001446763,0.041503105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709998,0.00018438775,0.0009194348,0.0011601938,0.025572687,0.0011635032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98823357,0.004107932,0.0003108647,0.0013859835,0.005362674,0.0005989694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04056021,0.00019610455,0.0003215265,0.23710883,0.00045066926,0.005520524,0.004318613,0.00013791367,0.0013559798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063997105,0.00013755019,0.00021930598,0.7174109,0.00030948242,0.00095442066,0.0010133083,0.0002797748,0.004211696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010506521,0.0004090271,0.4820734,0.0000040695045,0.000006513895,0.000026811887,0.00004762019,0.00051724486,0.0019988555,0.023244454,0.30456445,0.18709704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004197239,0.00009214846,0.51089877,0.0000020891785,0.0000035159821,0.00001031488,0.000073439034,0.0044533517,0.002418191,0.030205755,0.45114565,0.00027702568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018243773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001985051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4803021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022680432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022269871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240776654","doi":"10.1092/aat8-3cgl-3j94-ph4f","title":"Changing Graph Use in Corporate Annual Reports: A Time-Series Analysis*","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Time series; Series (stratigraphy); Graph; Business; Mathematics; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geology","score_opus":0.5290477156813584,"score_gpt":0.5203833162126095,"score_spread":0.008664399468748973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240776654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97681004,0.0010582177,0.00012453162,0.00079191633,0.00015298444,0.0005756068,0.000082815925,0.00007410085,0.020329783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94901145,0.00011009987,0.00034056103,0.000092057344,0.000121497134,0.000041439802,0.000046851907,0.000027801176,0.05020823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97931,0.0014073368,0.0017825777,0.0017577745,0.013921843,0.0018204907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834383,0.0069445847,0.0005887324,0.0020649345,0.0064296653,0.00053379365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11148889,0.0002773045,0.00079133746,0.17241673,0.0008298,0.0069615054,0.0025143428,0.00023216488,0.00367153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041405793,0.00022104324,0.00034387063,0.47366023,0.00062612246,0.0059267557,0.0010749914,0.0011006785,0.0011680902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018615247,0.0001858272,0.9481028,0.000007637393,0.00008947941,0.0010921597,0.00056029676,0.00023119111,0.0002880768,0.00011544378,0.027920792,0.021220157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010775338,0.00037108333,0.79734236,0.000099607554,0.000021240474,0.00007704328,0.004597975,0.012185943,0.0006074489,0.017309887,0.16534272,0.000967158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095703785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014844605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3012435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015707554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007040102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241175141","doi":"10.14429/djlit.37.11573","title":"Metamaterials Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2007-16","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; China; Library science; Metamaterial; World class; Web of science; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Optics; Law","score_opus":0.5649173997868181,"score_gpt":0.5944565569745612,"score_spread":0.029539157187743137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241175141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94991535,0.0004803391,0.010419322,0.010975781,0.0009796995,0.00033630425,0.00011004519,0.00005108886,0.026732087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98761904,0.0004896647,0.011148626,0.000042924705,0.000084032195,0.000009426547,0.0000041022777,0.0000064255496,0.0005957739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873117,0.0003534617,0.0025891971,0.00026436572,0.008789293,0.00069198664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852946,0.0011452909,0.0037682357,0.0015954026,0.007826623,0.0003698625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029095357,0.0001516526,0.0005843825,0.14585528,0.00094758434,0.0065263915,0.008144996,0.00026553348,0.00086686295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0632099,0.00010797067,0.00021837257,0.14890714,0.00091194996,0.018520527,0.0022870041,0.00057459425,0.00014898564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063166226,0.00024261995,0.7403365,0.00004025058,0.000095957344,0.000012334132,0.00006868298,0.000045956338,0.00094249914,0.11232102,0.050925683,0.094905324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010754724,0.00042638468,0.8718072,0.000045251334,0.0000116584615,0.00017490734,0.00067893456,0.00029798655,0.0109382225,0.05671687,0.057664678,0.00016241585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017481158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.2157336e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13147072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002854057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013216106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997507},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4241357437","doi":"10.1088/2058-7058/30/8/22","title":"Chinese 'cash for papers' revealed","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Cash; Political science; Business; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.6257687221786153,"score_gpt":0.6346706546050684,"score_spread":0.008901932426453096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241357437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38230303,0.00040530937,0.012155202,0.009595747,0.0034421291,0.001281905,0.00022172237,0.00008938219,0.5905056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498097,0.000021424119,0.0012401945,0.00019963243,0.0006144077,0.000033641714,0.0000037527664,0.000014050655,0.0480632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946128,0.00005114116,0.0003691908,0.00061321125,0.0038322755,0.0005213616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273634,0.0032908516,0.0003579167,0.0018413842,0.0014845636,0.0002889717],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600887,0.00014466938,0.0003103127,0.008201121,0.0010588148,0.004474219,0.0037566563,0.00003686662,0.00028966262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027996434,0.00009394426,0.00026419642,0.037011217,0.00016863235,0.0006944998,0.00077198166,0.0001627816,0.00040706768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043152857,0.00018265532,0.39210024,0.000009847601,0.0000255426,0.0000056869567,0.000076643366,0.000017346782,0.0015668969,0.02199282,0.08234941,0.50162977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087932404,0.000064331885,0.4778631,0.0000087035605,0.000006777764,7.389922e-7,0.000021789645,0.004373458,0.00065307034,0.2965636,0.21929784,0.00026724185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038239898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084168016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5675067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042438896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008458339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241764505","doi":"10.1021/jacs.0c04253","title":"Update to Our Reader, Reviewer, and Author Communities—April 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of the American Chemical Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.29128303214082407,"score_gpt":0.5270847563751653,"score_spread":0.2358017242343412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241764505","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06095195,0.009060213,0.00063278025,0.15031654,0.7774755,0.0006351892,0.00061292347,0.00003238727,0.0002825567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020020824,0.03022744,0.01598916,0.011112414,0.91997683,0.000012781328,0.000021286949,0.00012374886,0.0025155079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98245794,0.0006553968,0.0016446143,0.0005045521,0.014118088,0.0006194242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97770125,0.007957224,0.0034650855,0.0013054496,0.008226705,0.0013443154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017099798,0.0003617772,0.0016208411,0.002047624,0.00029138604,0.0017323741,0.007741293,0.0003360464,0.000054715478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10882322,0.00019864559,0.001340605,0.06484069,0.0005368531,0.00023417338,0.0039066975,0.0037275744,0.000066985616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052600815,0.000046078338,0.00031299194,0.000023055276,0.0000955225,0.00000522383,0.00030684558,0.0000012941546,0.0012258197,0.0000014611189,0.97928315,0.018645959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002697663,0.0002019418,0.00021711379,0.00010146718,0.00006413431,0.000013404005,0.0023869225,0.000076965895,0.00036219944,0.00037568813,0.9956833,0.0002470877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010848702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020954496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14250138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036736586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084322784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241889296","doi":"10.1002/asi.20888","title":"Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literature; Library science; Natural science; Computer science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Data science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.19550787465052466,"score_gpt":0.4623797083122703,"score_spread":0.26687183366174566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241889296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98421335,0.00006186569,0.011766738,0.0030569118,0.0001541136,0.00019970766,0.000010954738,0.0000113405395,0.00052503817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516815,0.00022444755,0.004161401,0.00033271837,0.000011417454,0.0000051847915,4.3857438e-7,0.0000016231888,0.000094646544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026775,0.000014166449,0.0012682957,0.00017381314,0.007887334,0.00038862287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96304363,0.000609794,0.0035111408,0.0003966988,0.032245107,0.00019365725],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020302929,0.0001063433,0.00045700071,0.3879982,0.0010427777,0.0016255957,0.0034192104,0.00007028617,0.000012200737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037297126,0.00006118925,0.00043771928,0.88342136,0.006742647,0.00787826,0.00070760195,0.00025853465,0.000010573918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007316556,0.00009902123,0.3403982,0.000029023751,0.0002601891,2.8418634e-7,0.005985707,0.00010582247,0.0034196666,0.007811286,0.02899052,0.6128271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017714786,0.0019586163,0.50007063,0.000030597752,0.00024076737,0.0005887469,0.053463895,0.048233222,0.0138195,0.009815167,0.36952487,0.00048248557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026413703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.1607225e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6123446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011603249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013879016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994108},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4242436697","doi":"10.32920/14668977.v1","title":"Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Rice University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Gender diversity; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Representation (politics); Gender disparity; Principal (computer security); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.8309185971340006,"score_gpt":0.6203364727099676,"score_spread":0.210582124424033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242436697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88872725,0.0036756052,0.008247669,0.0011871686,0.007568753,0.0006846273,0.00002994295,0.00014293981,0.08973605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98571014,0.00023468745,0.006048811,0.0003845043,0.00047227717,0.000039430182,0.000011915102,0.000028917899,0.0070693106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572161,0.0007933922,0.0019033669,0.0046831323,0.03371556,0.0016884401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97903967,0.0035770473,0.0008657982,0.0051548076,0.010208778,0.0011538867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0813081,0.000492797,0.0009589929,0.07304206,0.00080273306,0.025447922,0.012191013,0.00046032618,0.003577359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050305367,0.0003503293,0.00054905144,0.27430385,0.001012586,0.0006848926,0.021122225,0.0014613147,0.00037219192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006707724,0.0014546908,0.35241035,0.00018089789,0.00019397995,0.0004605066,0.0012493975,0.0031316495,0.013857824,0.0147674205,0.017931387,0.59429485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072269636,0.00012225109,0.8504038,0.000111520356,0.000036881513,0.00006280331,0.001291219,0.008952701,0.027853819,0.06984645,0.037967913,0.0026279602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032224483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043187054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5916669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006275946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028678614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242703513","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0019","title":"Writing Successful Covering Letters for Unsolicited Submissions to Academic Journals: Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.573081142464283,"score_gpt":0.56947874865817,"score_spread":0.0036023938061129357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242703513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7012161,0.0011212862,0.12907712,0.1668872,0.0009162239,0.00025432647,0.000026750964,0.000014399217,0.00048661407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701155,0.000201223,0.017329214,0.011198308,0.0010355593,0.0000062355543,0.0000014474365,0.000028329823,0.000084195126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814835,0.00028659342,0.0026284591,0.0004997304,0.014076414,0.0010252747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97289073,0.006238474,0.0019150587,0.0005266449,0.01639564,0.0020334683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.092327274,0.00021892668,0.00059083715,0.063293576,0.0008624563,0.13122219,0.0064248717,0.00026876025,0.00009523869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24748841,0.00015888365,0.0004228203,0.08513451,0.000057220772,0.077416874,0.0009898177,0.0033774402,0.000022565588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029783387,0.00033821323,0.36221313,0.000030929314,0.00017242572,0.00016847237,0.0019503497,0.017889105,0.14593762,0.003742596,0.2785831,0.18867622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010280841,0.0014334391,0.29919994,0.0017319822,0.00009636224,0.0009915011,0.011003764,0.0013929651,0.013995611,0.05679202,0.6017509,0.0013306915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006467821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034837526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3231678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008665951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242730467","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.440","title":"A Short Note on Short Notes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Publication; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6367200351995497,"score_gpt":0.5627808514479131,"score_spread":0.07393918375163655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242730467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95640296,0.001972999,0.008686144,0.008806874,0.0032619697,0.000111516885,0.000011689319,0.000015940392,0.020729931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298364,0.00007902786,0.00411887,0.0008539339,0.0015579942,0.00000119451,8.548206e-7,0.000017523516,0.0003869635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97429967,0.0004140398,0.0015160183,0.00036207773,0.022460375,0.0009478091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97327137,0.009231825,0.0005563324,0.0007914499,0.014420446,0.0017285919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12181847,0.00018613697,0.00046868363,0.06331486,0.00035697423,0.13372979,0.005145093,0.0002916147,0.00027173056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36659026,0.00011749222,0.00038423797,0.09066738,0.000082744205,0.14340325,0.00075402344,0.0029210034,0.00017222493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037888345,0.00020527739,0.61313474,0.0000016332285,0.000021988655,0.000028149845,0.00020275776,0.000027038648,0.0017918159,0.0009285277,0.033363085,0.3502571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034229466,0.0003531903,0.81855536,0.000043212385,0.00001709246,0.00021482994,0.00045616593,0.00022313048,0.0026847427,0.0032577687,0.17360091,0.00025129318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017923408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023738357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003341187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002967587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243208282","doi":"10.1002/asi.20910","title":"Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic‐coupling analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Information science; Data science; Coupling (piping); Sociology; Library science; Information retrieval; Engineering; Citation","score_opus":0.21646723872275167,"score_gpt":0.5034285396013762,"score_spread":0.2869613008786246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243208282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992402,0.00023746978,0.0051211193,0.0018577352,0.00011579931,0.00019110761,0.000007784703,0.0000075275634,0.00005941958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542123,0.0014338391,0.003059316,0.00005757657,0.000015746642,0.000005553328,1.8532467e-7,0.0000014146891,0.0000051331385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909545,0.000045319328,0.001151104,0.00021882528,0.0070794458,0.0005507971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849156,0.002306532,0.0015646088,0.00039186326,0.0106710605,0.00015032271],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05711526,0.0000951112,0.00038347117,0.18943049,0.0013094406,0.0008461589,0.0022257154,0.00007162955,0.0000025572313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056182254,0.00005887628,0.0001768019,0.54458445,0.014394858,0.011587499,0.00083953806,0.0004945715,9.669046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104014274,0.00006366005,0.87153274,0.000027909067,0.00008112307,3.0766626e-7,0.009573632,0.0030373724,0.011476153,0.0044225184,0.0020017796,0.09767882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065677013,0.00083222386,0.71690416,0.00004680985,0.000041101048,0.00010218247,0.114906415,0.14896704,0.008188708,0.004490653,0.0046459474,0.00021797296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017991701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013086785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35515398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003101345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016196189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243797338","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-24448-4_11","title":"Perseverance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.7329864325617113,"score_gpt":0.5853421986421216,"score_spread":0.1476442339195897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243797338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004440173,0.0011834732,0.000928215,0.0005303659,0.001097421,0.00022837945,0.00004655633,0.000028848091,0.9959123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039148983,0.0004940335,0.00037832052,0.0003869837,0.00014449806,0.0000010019614,0.0000046169366,0.000025890147,0.99464977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830992,0.000023630417,0.00063295325,0.0010471165,0.014771743,0.00042535734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99190265,0.0029438592,0.00027210216,0.0015201988,0.003045145,0.00031603],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009512783,0.00024011146,0.0004993979,0.07143498,0.00009539653,0.002036758,0.0033662773,0.00037398655,0.0596761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006161644,0.00015176684,0.00036094667,0.02417081,0.00012877352,0.00026828534,0.0008718078,0.00049796107,0.07415797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005991556,0.000009059362,0.0003804056,0.0000035578682,0.000016188493,0.000015728903,0.000011247375,0.0000043075966,0.000008998782,0.40496796,0.42516822,0.16940834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112692134,0.00005120648,0.00045717508,0.000008059134,0.0000028473034,0.000004282011,0.0000106463,0.0003018283,0.000008923384,0.06941129,0.9294135,0.00021754093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011348921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007315532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5042453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105395935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000406325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243860731","doi":"10.1021/cen-09801-meetings1","title":"Pacifichem 2020 call for papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"C&EN Global Enterprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Presentation (obstetrics); Theme (computing); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.2981916699159581,"score_gpt":0.5421405324163878,"score_spread":0.24394886250042974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243860731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010508262,0.010587059,0.017788712,0.007081326,0.015048582,0.0021341802,0.01256985,0.000095948955,0.9336435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13394745,0.008708133,0.004881599,0.0050536403,0.0049804496,0.00042723567,0.0014777384,0.0001939313,0.8403298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857159,0.0003197656,0.001354799,0.002240706,0.009074106,0.0012946787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99073094,0.003464998,0.00059642707,0.0014037727,0.0023342834,0.001469584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060028904,0.0006071334,0.0011613889,0.008707891,0.00026398778,0.0038709594,0.00642019,0.0007529703,0.006952941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029125107,0.0004554212,0.0009944775,0.090932354,0.00021640463,0.00028553754,0.0019458804,0.0006773628,0.034556225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013542043,0.000090052534,0.00067120517,0.000040362447,0.00006980194,0.000035827787,0.00006186354,0.000025789688,0.00006655408,0.00008441197,0.93683714,0.061881565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007027417,0.00027839778,0.0004972731,0.000036334484,0.000027493343,0.000010292424,0.00017675068,0.0011555555,0.0000716007,0.0006687782,0.9958851,0.00048971584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070200826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014940442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13289662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007065371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083839963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243951141","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/px8kt","title":"The Diverse Niches of Megajournals: Specialism within Generalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological niche; Publishing; Diversity (politics); Generalist and specialist species; Discipline; Niche; Novelty; Popularity; Originality; Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Sociology; Biology; Ecology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7794564199695639,"score_gpt":0.6084614387705788,"score_spread":0.17099498119898515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243951141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8426738,0.008481746,0.005723003,0.007537367,0.019239696,0.0012330653,0.0002533707,0.000046917758,0.114811055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968901,0.004372547,0.0025816488,0.00026691836,0.0008080139,0.000012402211,0.0000064649203,0.00002764989,0.095034264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97889775,0.0006648829,0.001788495,0.0010177962,0.017001161,0.00062992837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980129,0.008990065,0.0016072837,0.0027676998,0.0061186235,0.00038730126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052515257,0.00028847426,0.00072735,0.035773944,0.0003742199,0.0053278846,0.009307532,0.00039186448,0.0015576789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03952551,0.0001375272,0.00059575913,0.06722052,0.00044666533,0.00027022776,0.008577928,0.0011217137,0.00062311115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099117155,0.00024113755,0.045254994,0.000040149,0.00030672803,0.0000362261,0.0012599768,0.0068382476,0.0011599833,0.04025115,0.78615665,0.11835563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015829182,0.00033489434,0.06750833,0.00013239573,0.0000950034,0.000028758152,0.0064539434,0.05211099,0.016565513,0.43026128,0.42339927,0.0015267108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006214085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013436556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39001012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012563528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080997485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243954041","doi":"10.1504/ijtm.2019.096511","title":"Citation impact of public and private funding on nanotechnology-related publications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Public funding; Citation impact; Economics; Business; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.3907934107378278,"score_gpt":0.5537485753717843,"score_spread":0.16295516463395654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243954041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667194,0.00015427356,0.0118357055,0.01675022,0.00058417016,0.00012043856,0.0000075901457,0.000029338884,0.003798901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571955,0.0002707729,0.0035439213,0.000032472813,0.00003305793,0.000003352515,0.0000011912565,0.0000055149403,0.00039016386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561286,0.000058621015,0.0008721882,0.0002635132,0.0029477882,0.0002450339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323815,0.00040683724,0.00096987997,0.00036484728,0.0049243905,0.00009590715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007064827,0.00009485204,0.00020283544,0.10072918,0.000092364324,0.00042236256,0.0026426085,0.00014923258,0.00029020506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011362403,0.00006565702,0.00012324577,0.0411709,0.0004958533,0.0005029081,0.00075905706,0.00026106538,0.000051024657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034142846,0.00021977774,0.122488864,0.0000017059351,0.00045823367,0.000017302307,0.000035855766,0.000024121162,0.0021315475,0.29183114,0.0038737133,0.5788836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001882498,0.0023557132,0.5364898,0.00007230676,0.000028679799,0.0001931149,0.0006617773,0.002614916,0.0044927755,0.41605017,0.034947023,0.00021126021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037478494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015494156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57867235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023418482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058829293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244106180","doi":"10.1111/jth.14436","title":"Simplify, simplify","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Delegate; Timeline; Publishing; Editorial board; Computer science; Library science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.5788981268490309,"score_gpt":0.6023136586077634,"score_spread":0.023415531758732566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244106180","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01377811,0.006575297,0.0004943879,0.0027739163,0.9723209,0.00030869528,0.0007031881,0.00001143961,0.0030340613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035692614,0.049956888,0.002075786,0.0004007882,0.90733445,0.000005038799,0.000037954695,0.00013488914,0.0043615927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97515696,0.0003798575,0.0023653135,0.0008230065,0.020513158,0.0007617071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621958,0.021297734,0.0029917844,0.0011047776,0.011563645,0.0008462584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027748616,0.00044614673,0.0019502458,0.040810533,0.0002900529,0.0050411946,0.004004432,0.001097106,0.0010739688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07196476,0.00028218518,0.00080462,0.041563094,0.0002496527,0.00091697066,0.0013370559,0.0019875672,0.00031077905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005085968,0.00010567799,0.0016743297,0.000033178192,0.00019574695,0.000015603839,0.00006511946,0.0000072408398,0.000040332092,0.000030939143,0.93015665,0.06762434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009892954,0.0006635877,0.003370893,0.00009292949,0.00012386931,0.000013699423,0.0002484296,0.00006186735,0.000087264634,0.0025577573,0.9914551,0.00033533043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063163956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009600045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026957341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012486425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244253791","doi":"10.3138/9781442671607","title":"Browsing Science Research at the Federal Level in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.6100471565437651,"score_gpt":0.48644969113370873,"score_spread":0.12359746541005634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244253791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047650146,0.0025145325,0.0000427534,0.000106286556,0.00036601565,0.00046927476,0.00014158426,0.000005922251,0.9915886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033961575,0.00017306357,0.00011212093,0.000020750324,0.000039135728,3.5331308e-7,0.0000025625611,0.000011490739,0.96567893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97963375,0.00032635452,0.00045248042,0.0010359837,0.017553957,0.0009974822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907443,0.0031443317,0.00034248942,0.0013637773,0.0039904215,0.00041468805],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017554916,0.00020702409,0.0004527234,0.0064460463,0.001349655,0.00074577826,0.008027645,0.00018394775,0.00070369063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033583231,0.00016071498,0.00013545022,0.002045725,0.0018685793,0.00042757863,0.005249006,0.0007276455,0.000018232646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046568032,0.00014086474,0.0030497238,0.00012479596,0.000105033105,0.0007990292,0.012948527,0.0009911556,0.0011888118,0.023561904,0.6957381,0.26088643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051493023,0.00006186433,0.009333093,0.000094554256,0.0000052456257,0.000005073181,0.00067010167,0.00036328225,0.0004077468,0.0015624929,0.98673475,0.0002468667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99705344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2909967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031935055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043752987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244881406","doi":"10.1002/asi.20744","title":"Long‐term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady‐state science (1900–2004)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Phenomenon; Period (music); Term (time); Scientific literature; History; Demography; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.11938041681518939,"score_gpt":0.46440421884466293,"score_spread":0.3450238020294735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244881406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96185374,0.00010255991,0.032445543,0.0046365624,0.0005619979,0.00027471746,0.000028115455,0.0000055199753,0.00009121689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399954,0.000046108697,0.0053249937,0.0005774235,0.000028194652,0.0000034825207,5.251555e-7,0.0000020495306,0.000017665712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912204,0.0000386391,0.0010453473,0.00026452015,0.00689081,0.00054028095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870353,0.0011750569,0.0014512422,0.0005695066,0.009607836,0.00016110607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057345822,0.00009752612,0.00025070718,0.026743785,0.0010351738,0.0026550887,0.0050983843,0.000043236243,0.0000025052275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020699063,0.00005093265,0.00016733583,0.2660492,0.0051789633,0.003952039,0.00071318046,0.0003409797,0.0000031742952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010081459,0.00020369187,0.23297188,0.000017048964,0.000033281707,0.0000029992475,0.028262405,0.000081899125,0.06760382,0.013632722,0.004318276,0.6527712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010027111,0.00059078296,0.9117518,0.00007813084,0.000019982775,0.00009040867,0.019575262,0.0028971303,0.03028701,0.027439278,0.006013077,0.000254423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028875174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009449572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6787799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019756249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092497235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244994113","doi":"10.13021/g89k55","title":"The Journal Impact Factor and its discontents: steps toward responsible metrics and better research assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Scholarship; Declaration; Citation impact; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Metric (unit); Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Business; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.9026090047239823,"score_gpt":0.6611413626244598,"score_spread":0.24146764209952254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244994113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757965,0.0018512451,0.00032364618,0.014642983,0.00016619358,0.0008848554,0.00009440323,0.00001023242,0.006229923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993786,0.0032845968,0.00077509624,0.00023593883,0.000100782745,0.000038048256,4.3798016e-7,0.000025221423,0.0017538777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842398,0.0013500592,0.0009877787,0.0009945446,0.011062667,0.0013651457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95803857,0.024048788,0.0005555999,0.00035774082,0.01581063,0.0011886698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.121591076,0.00027928653,0.00044917944,0.02154365,0.0025140836,0.03172173,0.0046339207,0.0001710389,0.00034169224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14342698,0.00011865434,0.00009652319,0.058632284,0.0005421138,0.010093706,0.004936514,0.0015481763,0.000106073036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039812914,0.00008759237,0.7641395,0.000007588684,0.00008861891,0.000014512627,0.00079804374,1.796435e-8,0.012288199,0.0034031987,0.006529838,0.21224478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001419203,0.0010128274,0.93286157,0.00009731407,0.000009725574,0.00006793531,0.0038655656,0.00007356823,0.0031092083,0.046552647,0.010657693,0.00027272655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002166727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069277603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21197206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053103745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008010161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245049036","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Public relations; Community engagement; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245049036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76012987,0.0006947,0.004638785,0.013138427,0.0023844033,0.0019956345,0.00026903258,0.00012284126,0.21662632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659306,0.00076065166,0.005329396,0.00066851,0.0009959363,0.000120761404,0.00005287859,0.000051079864,0.026090194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692598,0.0016403924,0.0017806817,0.0023394988,0.023144927,0.0018346995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829185,0.006796824,0.00046959857,0.0026646827,0.006275056,0.0008753624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503571,0.00044570546,0.0008543866,0.14316624,0.000335204,0.005920706,0.008752621,0.0008029101,0.0075698006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12709473,0.00032156953,0.0005106996,0.19830608,0.0005212522,0.0003108103,0.016812196,0.002282651,0.0022645004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022364213,0.0014783752,0.07378055,0.000109728804,0.00018652376,0.00013595307,0.0021336,0.0010577084,0.00064622576,0.010726617,0.67228156,0.23723951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002147948,0.0005423775,0.41984627,0.00010848132,0.000015069958,0.0000039108904,0.0018384699,0.027426451,0.0011701809,0.37001437,0.17539808,0.0014884032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012298875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49688348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011111915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245262479","doi":"10.1002/asi.21383","title":"A comparison of citer and citation‐based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Psychology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.3084545123489503,"score_gpt":0.5523056020953095,"score_spread":0.24385108974635922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245262479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611225,0.000029901508,0.027391832,0.010904621,0.0002390387,0.00025138308,0.000028950084,0.000005211532,0.000026550777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97211325,0.000009509562,0.027558582,0.00028285358,0.000013050297,0.0000081095295,3.0132404e-7,0.000001842873,0.000012503817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637,0.000011741525,0.00071883114,0.000118618635,0.0025680743,0.00021273657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98771757,0.0021882942,0.0015792595,0.0002581955,0.008164435,0.000092246664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011931316,0.00007107743,0.0003158025,0.00866467,0.00043867962,0.00044855,0.0012989481,0.000056576075,0.0000015538741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040643457,0.000036462687,0.00019322858,0.043351743,0.0024757092,0.0013672477,0.00023914638,0.00019736608,3.9216513e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003578257,0.000047464026,0.71432585,0.000012732169,0.00001922561,1.4224769e-8,0.00081036455,0.000029802655,0.016587146,0.0017651066,0.0034611805,0.26290536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030270515,0.0013156813,0.7077373,0.000023168963,0.000049256938,0.000022671322,0.028521815,0.16749176,0.024290338,0.018266309,0.048977457,0.0002771428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039500287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005414643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2626282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025485451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033519533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245281636","doi":"10.7554/elife.47338.010","title":"Author response: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Factor (programming language); Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.8569012841416782,"score_gpt":0.6973367844270371,"score_spread":0.15956449971464115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245281636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02990087,0.54531085,0.00037498595,0.4146376,0.0027707485,0.004821537,0.0017936087,0.000012124168,0.00037766906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007562718,0.32215112,0.0002511151,0.0016504456,0.0001232573,0.000025649613,0.000024129618,0.000032119617,0.66817945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97210693,0.005150189,0.0025191237,0.0007361402,0.018866496,0.00062113197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691673,0.015480333,0.0018768436,0.0016231291,0.01139605,0.0004563505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.121281244,0.00031984213,0.0011667302,0.041056085,0.00018829296,0.00082067924,0.0030799669,0.00048256354,0.0057552233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38991424,0.0001400394,0.00046626557,0.16037007,0.00020095301,0.00078218227,0.0010755962,0.0024448237,0.00013997132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001889251,0.000039482882,0.01613643,0.00041594327,0.000015969019,0.0000012020411,0.00002681512,0.0000040178857,0.00006269259,0.0000030740225,0.9322962,0.05097926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001755441,0.0001643526,0.33074066,0.005957111,0.000051362607,0.000072022885,0.000009743653,0.00024514404,0.0000081470225,0.00027446522,0.6621393,0.00016213398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009790664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032594417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034880976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003131562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245410681","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.3119","title":"The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; License; Scholarly communication; Web of science; Open science; Bibliometrics; Scale (ratio); Gold standard (test); Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine; Library science; Political science; Geography; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6436421491681436,"score_gpt":0.6585180130622761,"score_spread":0.014875863894132535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245410681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940372,0.0012870596,0.00083115377,0.00029432392,0.00009901095,0.0005175141,0.0007071463,0.0000018067176,0.0022247864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444455,0.0021933431,0.0001307795,0.0000056617987,0.0000044713206,0.000008857955,8.251627e-7,0.0000040721643,0.0032074477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180275,0.00042550275,0.0010282523,0.0006169519,0.0057802927,0.00034625552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861687,0.004919776,0.0018278111,0.0031046588,0.0038226494,0.00015644578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033087898,0.00014089957,0.0007326444,0.02040906,0.00026902818,0.006166421,0.020552507,0.00007913243,0.00039797055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024442911,0.0000533665,0.00055691553,0.091193594,0.00071868335,0.00063248136,0.03359208,0.00025348717,0.0000016676963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039166458,0.00010919444,0.9524899,0.000037202626,0.00044246766,2.576789e-7,0.00026968698,0.00096487976,0.0001985912,0.000056043827,0.0009141206,0.04447846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013112205,0.00004355663,0.94343776,0.000021855652,0.00013177775,1.5814517e-7,0.000077035846,0.039712068,0.0020686167,0.014239552,0.000071143644,0.000065372195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045747426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013632351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07078453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035422025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049556146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246533251","doi":"10.29173/jchla29405","title":"Dimensions","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054764921784485665,"score_gpt":0.40143029358987925,"score_spread":0.3466653718053936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246533251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40950552,0.2776452,0.00033254345,0.2822357,0.021980416,0.0006670799,0.0009801369,0.000018379373,0.0066349995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85520583,0.07203573,0.0025505777,0.032257758,0.0036353983,0.0000033539761,0.0000061681767,0.00007555462,0.034229606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97629905,0.00857246,0.0026172095,0.00036159513,0.009308958,0.002840717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95739096,0.022776261,0.008142803,0.0005204863,0.006688147,0.0044813105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0716516,0.0003641876,0.000988873,0.008568403,0.0021784867,0.010378493,0.002977449,0.00096827507,0.0023613018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10115365,0.0002903425,0.00068101566,0.024436805,0.000115176044,0.0026117188,0.00025955838,0.0035776757,0.000041535208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016201418,0.000043712083,0.44768366,0.00001834663,0.00019373983,0.000096424475,0.0007156376,0.000579972,0.000010566898,0.0012937314,0.5454389,0.003909148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078048446,0.0001643807,0.2592215,0.00017187894,0.00005139132,0.0007555129,0.0008306354,0.0014462185,0.000041179916,0.008777396,0.72751516,0.00024427767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5343523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5928947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44570035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0925233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17394987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247203496","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv8j6b1.28","title":"Canada’s Scientific Cooperation with Developing Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Regional science; Political science","score_opus":0.2913868173689603,"score_gpt":0.38177872773155397,"score_spread":0.09039191036259364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247203496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010563144,0.00019683474,0.0034829911,0.00020827615,0.00042562658,0.00032373672,0.00033871373,0.000018169625,0.99394935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0136412345,0.000046504523,0.0011542197,0.000054382814,0.00004237141,1.2316481e-7,0.000019075142,0.000015399228,0.9850267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180365,0.000050164857,0.00036978433,0.0007853357,0.006643721,0.00034736184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99033546,0.0006732775,0.00052097713,0.0007910814,0.0074496386,0.00022953306],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033925802,0.0002191805,0.0004151556,0.011794927,0.00070286007,0.0009880475,0.0021975627,0.00019897408,0.0011036822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055870827,0.0001821724,0.00007478615,0.001808699,0.0011903014,0.00022546732,0.0006321327,0.00021777506,0.0000699843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075816904,0.00001013123,0.0002621129,0.000045432356,0.00011462504,0.00012718368,0.0004970562,0.000023775885,0.000016562699,0.44384307,0.54729176,0.0076924963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025526554,0.000074135576,0.00014174638,0.00006682415,0.00002080896,0.000004286511,0.000054655924,0.00011925927,0.00040526415,0.00063179934,0.99798244,0.00024353342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1240353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5671077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4506907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036465173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063016466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247279204","doi":"10.7287/peerj.2264v0.3/reviews/1","title":"Peer Review #1 of \"Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada (v0.3)\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Library science; Operations research; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Regional science; Engineering; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.8648723760652484,"score_gpt":0.691887158452412,"score_spread":0.17298521761283636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247279204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002016122,0.0656891,0.00092223095,0.9179023,0.000246152,0.005424411,0.0007158229,0.0000022910544,0.008896098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054784715,0.070816115,0.0003197545,0.02113386,0.00016709669,0.0010858045,0.00022822192,0.00002158298,0.9007491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98530173,0.0006667313,0.0009387407,0.0007158342,0.011821395,0.0005555664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70719457,0.043834846,0.001316907,0.0018667621,0.24550252,0.00028438173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11164118,0.00014960472,0.00056221074,0.009721018,0.0005065394,0.00444088,0.009311497,0.000087980035,0.0005449559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2515037,0.00006339587,0.00009253411,0.055669054,0.00029654783,0.0015544777,0.0021985627,0.00029055282,0.0000064684523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008918901,0.000014065956,0.00024725203,0.0018532526,0.000007182295,2.0945564e-7,0.000077071316,4.951803e-8,0.0000018587814,0.00085655967,0.9175538,0.07937979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021755487,0.000049897695,0.0014064248,0.0030128518,0.000016579008,0.0000016407308,0.001935037,0.00019257287,0.00003817497,0.0016347612,0.9913916,0.00010289831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16491039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31408852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89676845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003330182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055434895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247380316","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u39052","title":"Watson, James Kay Graham, (born 20 April 1936), Principal Research Officer, National Research Council of Canada, 1987–2007, now Researcher Emeritus (Senior Research Officer, 1982–87)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Officer; Management; Principal (computer security); Library science; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.695203639937084,"score_gpt":0.5612403846769963,"score_spread":0.13396325526008768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247380316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01784469,0.048259985,0.00010554159,0.0077405535,0.0046669026,0.005259817,0.009779824,0.00012436374,0.90621835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0260148,0.06446925,0.0006790875,0.000218834,0.0054582125,0.00050169043,0.00061673665,0.00042167446,0.90161973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.5710553,0.017627327,0.0071592107,0.008372556,0.3809802,0.014805419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5836407,0.08137507,0.001526595,0.0071772453,0.32074147,0.0055389144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5364529,0.0016825646,0.0037733063,0.15226127,0.0052191573,0.0075000525,0.023828726,0.0035414607,0.010555435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41142076,0.001370402,0.0010754934,0.3172219,0.008170608,0.0014324472,0.013072604,0.021683438,0.002675294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010983018,0.0011362173,0.0028295142,0.0006116343,0.00030072022,0.00050575245,0.00070248544,0.00005020827,0.00007628326,0.0018333248,0.9440206,0.04683492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019865662,0.0011093717,0.010625795,0.0010089749,0.000020156653,0.000042090734,0.0025600304,0.0014092472,0.00042009223,0.00422046,0.97528636,0.001310839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45610094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65416175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19806083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037482258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2218379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247603127","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.364","title":"The Joy of Counting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Publishing; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Mathematics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.46913920548307897,"score_gpt":0.5373242602162541,"score_spread":0.06818505473317515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247603127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681423,0.001147856,0.0010623481,0.01246393,0.003086357,0.00005494264,0.000004312328,0.0000040256004,0.014033978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554455,0.00010803686,0.002916196,0.00014459045,0.0005041255,3.521858e-7,1.2165361e-7,0.000007099781,0.00077489775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793227,0.0002552602,0.0016751006,0.00022199706,0.018074911,0.0004500435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93068534,0.017201202,0.0031081007,0.0009421245,0.047448482,0.0006147451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17878065,0.00008499834,0.0002723315,0.0260362,0.0005322292,0.16819341,0.0072267116,0.0001673151,0.00015510047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54149103,0.00004246708,0.00023940479,0.07973782,0.00019023904,0.06994892,0.0007164858,0.003214232,0.000018589419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300483,0.000077581404,0.48385468,0.000003063457,0.0000342803,0.00001833318,0.00022726445,0.000012678547,0.037523493,0.010754377,0.08021565,0.3872456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065460673,0.00017565349,0.3746588,0.000023574197,0.000010114679,0.00016543719,0.0019053298,0.0006319289,0.0031698283,0.040051725,0.57842386,0.00012913413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044299322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026147767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49820822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004526332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005718088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247804864","doi":"10.32920/14642139.v1","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Political science; Data science; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8007876750054489,"score_gpt":0.6287589678712654,"score_spread":0.1720287071341835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247804864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9049072,0.038557157,0.009486156,0.008525744,0.0008626129,0.0007505211,0.0017967296,0.000036544632,0.03507732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204315,0.012230773,0.0031192852,0.00022260693,0.00006470201,0.000030045972,0.00029060405,0.000014420178,0.0019844323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857599,0.00073941675,0.0015355487,0.0019301837,0.009441086,0.0005938373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776063,0.012700203,0.0005910829,0.0062422697,0.0025934803,0.00026664682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041868225,0.0002637567,0.0006980997,0.7319274,0.00014715201,0.0066900505,0.011885222,0.0003241356,0.0011502757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034226198,0.00015028288,0.0001731791,0.9024518,0.00030335164,0.0008062198,0.012463636,0.00089631416,0.000019985702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039847773,0.00035039315,0.26823375,0.000019299128,0.00002843059,0.000012972745,0.00017412577,0.00003064579,0.00008520488,0.00082859263,0.0634124,0.6668202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022138657,0.000038521943,0.9702316,0.000020692527,0.000015211241,0.000014498621,0.0006815132,0.0019082658,0.000040486622,0.0025764802,0.024052545,0.00019878372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020424586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079913397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7019979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058740505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004341326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247834764","doi":"10.7287/peerj.4375v0.1/reviews/3","title":"Peer Review #3 of \"The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (v0.1)\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"OpenAlex","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); State (computer science); Data science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.6140793373211468,"score_gpt":0.6506770163382228,"score_spread":0.036597679017076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247834764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18916726,0.7075855,0.00052830135,0.05365822,0.0010471483,0.006950711,0.01878049,0.000009220235,0.022273105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088642955,0.4043727,0.0004015281,0.0008829516,0.00003306691,0.00004175453,0.000029238352,0.000027446205,0.5055683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776035,0.0010404161,0.0025344768,0.0007997323,0.017582553,0.0004393384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603569,0.0035202287,0.0034917886,0.003230547,0.029185155,0.00021541519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06757214,0.00025871702,0.002250423,0.01886845,0.00009162581,0.0006787042,0.016090665,0.000105695595,0.007937071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09461969,0.000102385304,0.0013729271,0.3040883,0.00079511973,0.00062985625,0.011226654,0.0002757299,0.0000064586247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001209049,0.00020624284,0.09449658,0.008856155,0.0005145213,2.003114e-7,0.00006644123,0.000006618581,0.000043278415,0.000008926688,0.86968535,0.02610359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039813845,0.00029115056,0.7739423,0.014980243,0.0025724208,0.0000022159468,0.000036480807,0.0018173496,0.0015461207,0.0014096597,0.2026679,0.00033599685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022018962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005998977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67944574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057734265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008529185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248757258","doi":"10.1556/scient.67.2006.1.1","title":"Key Labs and Open Labs in the Chinese scientific research system: Their role in the national and international scientific arena","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Science Citation Index; Citation; Key (lock); Library science; Chinese academy of sciences; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; History; Law","score_opus":0.5945123837319141,"score_gpt":0.593806149860948,"score_spread":0.0007062338709660221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248757258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509983,0.0029052193,0.000052442043,0.0037106278,0.0012437458,0.0010476724,0.00016419026,0.000014192637,0.039863598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951642,0.000044835433,0.00023932436,0.00012848998,0.00015072334,0.00008031988,0.000028633081,0.000011178877,0.0041522626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640816,0.0020847549,0.0012719936,0.0021770175,0.028954996,0.0014296323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97729456,0.0141298175,0.00030019623,0.0012071647,0.0067909774,0.0002772922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27039412,0.00024684524,0.00035170827,0.16124608,0.002049613,0.0528011,0.011581393,0.00013899885,0.00009072709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050815355,0.00012271648,0.00007877634,0.5613865,0.002106619,0.0019925833,0.0038017046,0.0008250338,0.0001606389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004910176,0.00092479656,0.85550433,0.000027699401,0.000011020989,0.000040698662,0.0072135213,0.00016969391,0.00113616,0.03542786,0.06537916,0.034115948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090382586,0.00007145682,0.8559312,0.000027064274,0.0000018033272,0.000050993287,0.008599245,0.018287303,0.000056334957,0.03324895,0.08260381,0.00021798928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000543033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012826539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40014046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043094708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005685454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249889786","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.15256.1","title":"What is a predatory journal? A scoping review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"PsycINFO; Grey literature; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Web of science; Medicine; Information retrieval; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.9152973410968032,"score_gpt":0.7496890964298902,"score_spread":0.16560824466691293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249889786","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.255653e-7,0.9891187,0.000106277745,0.0008828244,0.0026197047,0.003716286,0.00009015624,0.000039791656,0.0034257455],"genre_scores_gemma":[5.2989005e-8,0.96390384,0.00022966017,0.0005779005,0.0011173005,0.00022318854,0.000016028762,0.00010245543,0.033829555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94984335,0.0044482057,0.003775579,0.00223753,0.0374523,0.002243045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553101,0.018983481,0.001865007,0.0047946726,0.016520204,0.002526517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15264933,0.0006879686,0.003806303,0.1078312,0.0009572492,0.026632125,0.016449604,0.000695651,0.02420215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10513544,0.00041257645,0.002047736,0.27617756,0.00077416096,0.0031723238,0.005682404,0.0030145394,0.028096732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000159701,0.000040207102,0.000004013262,0.026080213,0.00004341976,0.000061667655,0.000020137191,6.281368e-9,2.5901524e-8,0.000008139489,0.37155786,0.60218275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008043241,0.00013712017,0.0000012251758,0.31544873,0.000054660017,0.00019659036,0.00003515115,0.000009269235,6.34924e-7,0.00047007186,0.68326277,0.00030332606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009779443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005209153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008336073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4250022371","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.307","title":"The Ontology of the Scholarly Journal and the Place of Peer Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington State University; American Council of Learned Societies","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Argument (complex analysis); Scholarly communication; Ontology; Peer review; World Wide Web; Sociology; Protocol (science); Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5900117260462768,"score_gpt":0.5086279091273846,"score_spread":0.08138381691889218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250022371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.501019,0.24978478,0.0009405482,0.22137274,0.0035604057,0.00052221934,0.000016428703,0.000004073125,0.022779772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684786,0.025133388,0.0016779562,0.0016248118,0.00028087595,0.0000019462973,1.1154585e-7,0.000013976558,0.0027883286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97030175,0.0031479814,0.0029469703,0.00028223926,0.022772823,0.0005482281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8778931,0.019921625,0.007942606,0.0016500921,0.09190711,0.00068551034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30130348,0.00014276292,0.0006341894,0.008707571,0.0009080018,0.05334529,0.010325752,0.00017793667,0.00015169385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.595299,0.000049287195,0.0004989155,0.043623913,0.0009050041,0.048272338,0.0014129385,0.0042702025,0.000003944252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006382672,0.00023656625,0.35013866,0.000087789595,0.00035679873,0.0000363618,0.0034652918,0.0000052300156,0.0008509788,0.028489431,0.3972539,0.21844074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038807585,0.0005893907,0.5829537,0.0010880234,0.00017674628,0.002416728,0.005490758,0.000113673115,0.00057851936,0.09379837,0.3086857,0.00022764064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010233776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002570188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008660446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008971998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250503452","doi":"10.32920/14668977","title":"Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Rice University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gender diversity; Diversity (politics); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Representation (politics); Gender disparity; Principal (computer security); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.8309185971340006,"score_gpt":0.6203364727099676,"score_spread":0.210582124424033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250503452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88872725,0.0036756052,0.008247669,0.0011871686,0.007568753,0.0006846273,0.00002994295,0.00014293981,0.08973605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98571014,0.00023468745,0.006048811,0.0003845043,0.00047227717,0.000039430182,0.000011915102,0.000028917899,0.0070693106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572161,0.0007933922,0.0019033669,0.0046831323,0.03371556,0.0016884401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97903967,0.0035770473,0.0008657982,0.0051548076,0.010208778,0.0011538867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0813081,0.000492797,0.0009589929,0.07304206,0.00080273306,0.025447922,0.012191013,0.00046032618,0.003577359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050305367,0.0003503293,0.00054905144,0.27430385,0.001012586,0.0006848926,0.021122225,0.0014613147,0.00037219192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006707724,0.0014546908,0.35241035,0.00018089789,0.00019397995,0.0004605066,0.0012493975,0.0031316495,0.013857824,0.0147674205,0.017931387,0.59429485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072269636,0.00012225109,0.8504038,0.000111520356,0.000036881513,0.00006280331,0.001291219,0.008952701,0.027853819,0.06984645,0.037967913,0.0026279602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032224483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043187054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5916669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006275946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028678614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250871096","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.14723481","title":"“Refereeing Template”: A Guide to Writing an Effective Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Constructive; Computer science; Key (lock); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Peer review; Data science; Information retrieval; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.6298690099803244,"score_gpt":0.6269340447212391,"score_spread":0.0029349652590852093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250871096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85368735,0.041300192,0.013464123,0.012584991,0.003179087,0.0035736277,0.000051959312,0.00021154628,0.07194715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494142,0.00561682,0.019061306,0.004179896,0.001118358,0.0006246514,0.00019418832,0.0001172837,0.019673329],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97715837,0.00074288726,0.0016236816,0.002574762,0.01690803,0.0009922445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703824,0.004752855,0.0005485551,0.0031372153,0.019942774,0.0012361967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070540294,0.00045289207,0.001229323,0.028470337,0.00031585133,0.0068459096,0.005196838,0.00042827276,0.0015821535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20684806,0.00035414784,0.0005246645,0.11678265,0.00008622261,0.000503397,0.0075066746,0.0014609687,0.0007522014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016236252,0.00026947216,0.013729045,0.001047945,0.000103629114,0.0002876505,0.00046598268,0.00013799098,0.0038554757,0.00012287108,0.3678685,0.6120952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009791907,0.00043118277,0.12516858,0.010073773,0.0001559862,0.00009679031,0.0020304294,0.003324686,0.026319573,0.0049773157,0.82347655,0.0029659204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021474443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035442696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60912925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003880758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050891365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251320174","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.3.155","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; State (computer science); Scholarly communication; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251320174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964039,0.021743089,0.0063054026,0.04776792,0.0048840316,0.00022423283,0.000051802173,0.000021208301,0.02259841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844636,0.0009922826,0.0044904645,0.0005080104,0.0018491471,0.0000015785827,0.0000021262404,0.00004079084,0.007652025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94940376,0.0017794955,0.00533766,0.0006332983,0.04131675,0.0015290595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906631,0.013196798,0.007354958,0.0013817713,0.08584669,0.0015566972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2426471,0.0003150076,0.00079749426,0.05885836,0.001704326,0.7083249,0.016251445,0.00037027118,0.00020023923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4286284,0.00017608967,0.0007863065,0.120495245,0.00038449236,0.4241893,0.0015302089,0.008677665,0.000039827846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019614608,0.00032562614,0.16621093,0.000007703108,0.00013161024,0.00020985256,0.000468503,0.00055667263,0.0035423567,0.003603014,0.3993083,0.42543927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020120714,0.00053077046,0.24496739,0.00009730576,0.000031593845,0.0009982442,0.0015374713,0.00045444752,0.0010107914,0.18816835,0.5598605,0.00033106454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040050215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065221684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42510822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007515392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035206825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251351146","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-51824/v2","title":"Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iran University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Social network (sociolinguistics); Data visualization; Network analysis; World Wide Web; Data mining; Social media; Engineering","score_opus":0.8665983623874701,"score_gpt":0.7567904815591467,"score_spread":0.10980788082832338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251351146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85069215,0.001139619,0.14264591,0.0003871132,0.0008254433,0.0006104222,0.00013893419,0.000027001546,0.00353341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912894,0.0002704043,0.0067608147,0.000018160606,0.0009492232,0.000020769909,0.00020803776,0.00002583612,0.00045737188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95253426,0.012219498,0.0031646325,0.0018812672,0.028942095,0.0012582727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501305,0.023297373,0.0011243275,0.0015903894,0.023321828,0.0005355307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18955915,0.00023400947,0.0014470341,0.0963446,0.0012759096,0.0048432215,0.0033216479,0.00077037764,0.0008590288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19454916,0.00019636458,0.0015361501,0.32494977,0.00053467165,0.00038368828,0.006707076,0.002963093,0.000029698285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040550833,0.00063081534,0.8968155,0.00013418595,0.0008734308,0.000031576303,0.0010978961,0.041063037,0.00006730996,0.006081218,0.0071939467,0.045970548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029923266,0.00011754027,0.6081456,0.0001313028,0.00017131111,7.1459027e-7,0.0037266365,0.37361887,0.000024171226,0.011562664,0.0018974743,0.00030450072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007114345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001786759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33255583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028538206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025196502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251534506","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.73","title":"Scholarly Journal Publication: Conflicting Agendas for Scholars, Publishers, and Institutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Scientific communication; Public relations; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6062381390631345,"score_gpt":0.546711326355557,"score_spread":0.05952681270757754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251534506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64610106,0.013468113,0.12935776,0.18851504,0.006558413,0.00075506826,0.00009061757,0.00006642199,0.015087498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317927,0.00047587865,0.061171737,0.003008095,0.0023394388,0.000010545874,0.000010196834,0.00004408904,0.0011473245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076385,0.00045367883,0.0029386806,0.00072159135,0.014094588,0.0010275828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.904658,0.003653709,0.0035126787,0.0008736431,0.084797226,0.0025047408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13346893,0.00029338713,0.0006514028,0.057742838,0.0024611233,0.6718143,0.006441324,0.0004999654,0.00017042462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5751527,0.00021830117,0.00047313952,0.06891802,0.00028419573,0.51515424,0.00095780194,0.0055652424,0.000025263444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002443812,0.0007671937,0.19410838,0.00004148018,0.0004570614,0.0002118299,0.002390139,0.00049954886,0.006324133,0.10780525,0.2721273,0.41502333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00480932,0.0005782654,0.067853324,0.000121035824,0.00005290897,0.0026961528,0.0035324167,0.00009265834,0.00034508653,0.06250094,0.8570202,0.000397665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000473017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102541435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5848929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008403575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039984356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251658263","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.294","title":"Publication Diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Institution; Peer review; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7229583708939429,"score_gpt":0.5249491752440847,"score_spread":0.1980091956498582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251658263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323183,0.0010097842,0.0069847577,0.024001895,0.0011632732,0.00006724493,0.0000071618656,0.000014030246,0.034433562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301636,0.00017194959,0.0031764032,0.00071481004,0.00035534633,2.8875144e-7,9.0790775e-7,0.000005281979,0.0025586225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781549,0.0003139055,0.0011340629,0.0002980637,0.01971783,0.00038125593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94250196,0.0027953032,0.0015761245,0.0006046042,0.051634073,0.00088791456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07165375,0.00008852355,0.00026731615,0.05868624,0.0010127793,0.09897815,0.006142166,0.00016586659,0.0004996992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38983092,0.000060151444,0.00023202658,0.11474872,0.000107283886,0.19020168,0.0021591613,0.0015260908,0.0001293652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015024361,0.000077129254,0.6888892,7.1487943e-7,0.000013471294,0.000052590323,0.00039900106,0.000007329716,0.00024344116,0.0008031909,0.26394552,0.04555335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054167263,0.000121961515,0.8118899,0.0000057396237,0.000004597206,0.00037485283,0.00034246338,0.00015652463,0.00016264146,0.0071533006,0.17914955,0.0000968186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006199709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020756534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31817716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022663064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048380753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252049718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.297","title":"Book Reviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"LYN; History; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.7930948307567358,"score_gpt":0.5851686614161555,"score_spread":0.20792616934058028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252049718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651114,0.6182971,0.02361865,0.10347696,0.009544794,0.0004810242,0.00001374992,0.000035504378,0.14802107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632887,0.029028505,0.0833837,0.06924103,0.01186818,0.000014426902,0.000006090408,0.00014075528,0.14302863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763234,0.0007605337,0.0019557488,0.00032042988,0.020165108,0.0004747258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95477957,0.002731729,0.0021704661,0.0008103384,0.03746368,0.0020442056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21411593,0.00011985779,0.0005045555,0.053531054,0.00015139492,0.20021614,0.006167255,0.0001713474,0.00059594825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6044497,0.00007068438,0.00030072057,0.10735515,0.00006478688,0.19023277,0.000785425,0.0019131968,0.00040273322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013633672,0.00004047884,0.02632698,0.0000012793038,0.0000068453905,0.00003451887,0.00013503281,0.0000076031706,0.00011743668,0.00027223854,0.8651038,0.1079402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201233,0.00018240717,0.0076310607,0.000024746932,0.000005221034,0.00013816627,0.0003901829,0.0000869228,0.00007442163,0.008540619,0.98231894,0.00008716488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017819655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014247803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58926857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027962617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252473923","doi":"10.1002/asi.21240","title":"An index to measure a scientist's specific impact","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.20108260231108796,"score_gpt":0.5199338026873302,"score_spread":0.31885120037624226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252473923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95774287,0.000069719776,0.027899712,0.0135017065,0.000260256,0.00024501735,0.000012875144,0.000013275066,0.0002545809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925969,0.000051414714,0.0057585016,0.0015320206,0.000039723393,0.000001775984,1.2539736e-7,0.000001758354,0.0000177307],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923897,0.000026133293,0.000672553,0.00020537582,0.0062508327,0.00045544788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875285,0.0002684778,0.0010428359,0.0005626168,0.010256135,0.0003414056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024595963,0.00009740502,0.00027406454,0.02101161,0.0007366959,0.0021944302,0.003902343,0.00005330418,0.000006491401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012195442,0.00005041569,0.0002572803,0.199211,0.0016591338,0.004097056,0.00025747757,0.00025789245,0.000009446623],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003737454,0.000042110194,0.013592427,6.8258163e-7,0.000007653088,2.2601996e-7,0.00046467298,0.00010977785,0.011066224,0.0017115056,0.0272171,0.94575024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012635435,0.005368996,0.6773177,0.000022962116,0.000014943718,0.00033127633,0.016004542,0.0131510245,0.0058112126,0.028576529,0.25174534,0.00039196695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005736192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.22149e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9453583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025023244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007473211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252522424","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100060","title":"Bibliometrics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8072790651955161,"score_gpt":0.6123744514756205,"score_spread":0.19490461371989554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252522424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006271216,0.0020416353,0.0032832348,0.00058177416,0.0016551568,0.00026135342,0.0001034469,0.00008433364,0.9919264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010677954,0.0014420303,0.0015131155,0.0005261466,0.00056453486,0.0000030876379,0.00001263523,0.000059528782,0.9948111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683749,0.000049449485,0.0013557174,0.0016325689,0.027785672,0.0008017117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777699,0.006641735,0.000629899,0.0024190869,0.011628044,0.00091131334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021086631,0.0004398454,0.0007765249,0.7123663,0.0002478466,0.006142751,0.0063948147,0.00080374087,0.19346368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037992235,0.00028633233,0.0005469956,0.47060236,0.0005172388,0.0004970021,0.0023567777,0.0006780182,0.08955342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045106344,0.00001526342,0.0002842024,0.0000019284616,0.000021193144,0.000022535109,0.0000060717325,1.890462e-7,0.0000036925385,0.06882817,0.78252536,0.14828691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010840744,0.00015145996,0.00019751131,0.0000069676785,0.0000065501577,0.00000848967,0.000015332149,0.000118562166,0.000031672986,0.25840473,0.7406543,0.00029602455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016382968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016333135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24176393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017651808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039370486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252556685","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100010970","title":"The Sciaticons","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Medicine; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.3228406279291064,"score_gpt":0.46981018968656596,"score_spread":0.14696956175745957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252556685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87821585,0.016581647,0.000074146395,0.073515534,0.019989312,0.00024165615,0.000050126917,0.00001171937,0.0113200005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614216,0.0043501183,0.0031865495,0.0032027026,0.0014538051,0.0000028611014,1.4595356e-7,0.000020003286,0.0016416368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97971857,0.0035822452,0.0026961328,0.0011717416,0.008329595,0.0045017013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562857,0.024926163,0.002630915,0.0007084763,0.0068158633,0.008632861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09889035,0.0006046411,0.0008995791,0.019948287,0.01895304,0.022811893,0.018235767,0.000659989,0.0015902185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1715798,0.0003273627,0.0007913915,0.06517553,0.053087093,0.003518057,0.00058456586,0.006465352,0.00010903104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058133908,0.00008550786,0.73599553,0.0000054837437,0.000031632873,0.006236179,0.0003998056,0.0010285957,0.00007096993,0.02740382,0.021205438,0.20747893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049760833,0.06274767,0.11620524,0.000049893304,0.00006682483,0.04128096,0.0009929304,0.009737582,0.0001277123,0.24176435,0.52579963,0.0007295785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004028581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29077414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61979026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004124356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022903526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252790236","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09071","title":"Group actions on trees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Humanities; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.7098790956922927,"score_gpt":0.6478241393564337,"score_spread":0.062054956335859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252790236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13194089,0.0003139226,0.00023563024,0.00054987986,0.002090492,0.00026301265,0.00002650518,0.0000673757,0.8645123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5037714,0.00035448934,0.0003587101,0.00025950704,0.00021030885,0.000015587579,0.00018912164,0.000017237666,0.49482363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852529,0.000119451324,0.0006382767,0.00092214823,0.012592799,0.00047441144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99358565,0.003014272,0.00027347953,0.0009297659,0.0018436748,0.0003531456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068210536,0.00022759903,0.00037173717,0.12386284,0.0003154931,0.0032234904,0.0023943244,0.00035450852,0.0045239343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017273825,0.00014323479,0.000307305,0.18591137,0.000028061704,0.0003126728,0.000058496655,0.00052943407,0.0044715255],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041504456,0.00021867358,0.0002811968,0.0000016132302,0.000010665903,0.00000769069,0.000034795696,0.000005867443,0.0003778002,0.009904371,0.23144859,0.75766724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033739282,0.00070601894,0.49816546,0.000024396944,0.000012708653,0.0000023026996,0.001512995,0.00043590806,0.0014648521,0.03851345,0.45835087,0.00047366772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010894234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014550665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75719357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011112193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015234554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99781126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253269937","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0186","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6562424014825697,"score_gpt":0.548536180641167,"score_spread":0.10770622084140269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253269937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8936077,0.0027916632,0.08039506,0.0020415832,0.0050147767,0.00051934615,0.000042465108,0.000012759062,0.015574649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837184,0.000006016985,0.0008477475,0.000052693176,0.00023351001,0.000003007367,2.4879685e-7,0.000014014759,0.00047089846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753696,0.000030181609,0.00048174805,0.00021206184,0.0012795065,0.00045957323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485266,0.00090487907,0.00017291521,0.00021340219,0.0017677521,0.0020883824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010912963,0.00010225129,0.00027771265,0.023403335,0.00011592143,0.007681988,0.002811776,0.000061752915,0.00007855177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029735317,0.000078617115,0.00006393074,0.018661091,0.000030454188,0.0021748294,0.00034587627,0.00020402142,0.0000037887419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012476454,0.000038114173,0.5589385,0.00013311107,0.0002489839,0.00051573286,0.003966679,0.11205848,0.0012513967,0.0038619775,0.17756628,0.14129598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028017745,0.00046480223,0.30244997,0.00021875148,0.000033557782,0.0003958626,0.000513665,0.090816416,0.000851985,0.01338303,0.5873744,0.00069579936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015927481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021233816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4098081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018122504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000862134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99662614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253529254","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2277553","title":"Scholarly Influence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.2660069962982836,"score_gpt":0.5094707021457291,"score_spread":0.24346370584744548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253529254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789584,0.0044088135,0.008056179,0.0028810536,0.00025108483,0.00014427037,0.0000012279704,0.000019015228,0.0052799527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853647,0.0040151314,0.00022806168,0.00022761934,0.00014036102,0.0000063078205,3.1196424e-7,0.000010121537,0.010007406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986682,0.00025068788,0.00062951713,0.00042198456,0.007936694,0.0040790895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090177,0.0012110751,0.00028443712,0.0005840538,0.006448229,0.0005704329],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04829176,0.00013218175,0.00020256006,0.029428704,0.00047250694,0.012489316,0.0034807164,0.00009987063,0.000745612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04124772,0.00008353255,0.00016476122,0.09944827,0.00010146554,0.006039165,0.00035269174,0.00298541,0.00595113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010545738,0.00009868137,0.18313618,9.874121e-7,0.00004737498,0.000008937084,0.00008402856,0.000063835585,0.0026709347,0.088065274,0.005886407,0.71992683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031011825,0.00024480926,0.12662923,0.0000046852592,0.0000023239802,0.00029368312,0.00087382016,0.000342951,0.00010217526,0.86368346,0.0073738606,0.00013889266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019697212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006998643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008118112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002847513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253695319","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.003","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable? A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Publish or perish; Publication; Field (mathematics); Production (economics); Sociology; Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4652991864906006,"score_gpt":0.4595776696386118,"score_spread":0.005721516851988795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253695319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94410366,0.021302417,0.00018846562,0.021069638,0.009632838,0.00013296351,0.000010503107,0.000007755327,0.0035517619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358326,0.00082045887,0.0016262069,0.0013712546,0.0014549933,0.0000035505684,0.000003137506,0.00001916564,0.0011179489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865929,0.0007427283,0.0018551399,0.00055580446,0.009139351,0.0011141123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791837,0.009860534,0.0016768216,0.001199601,0.0070835585,0.000995822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14045353,0.00019544935,0.00046434152,0.028969469,0.0006765735,0.5840897,0.007603413,0.00027134508,0.0008092319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15787525,0.00011497687,0.00032035325,0.08418008,0.0002455666,0.4059929,0.0013877321,0.0027068423,0.00006818289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026955355,0.00014000155,0.71382946,9.818332e-7,0.000024887768,0.0000115170105,0.0018785009,0.00006705685,0.00040324323,0.0006538694,0.04258201,0.24038154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060390896,0.000034824985,0.43465728,0.0000931693,0.00000859497,0.000050947707,0.015190156,0.00042428667,0.00006225181,0.010189876,0.5385044,0.00018027086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015811261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002076434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49592245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047069445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253770440","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scx025","title":"The perceived impact of four funding streams on academic research production in Nordic countries: the perspectives of system actors†","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Knowledge production; Business; STREAMS; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.6639325129419804,"score_gpt":0.6403203082306742,"score_spread":0.023612204711306206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253770440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98464364,0.00032962038,0.0000028042625,0.008754418,0.00019539449,0.00034112783,0.000017818918,0.000004933156,0.005710229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984446,0.000981426,0.0000036937993,0.0000075668077,0.00017404038,0.000010585682,1.1588442e-7,0.000004103637,0.00037387543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717177,0.00047393877,0.00051442673,0.0006508813,0.010186492,0.0010024715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615116,0.004985884,0.00052906724,0.0016586926,0.006344358,0.00033085558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095031746,0.00010955623,0.00023352953,0.030709201,0.0032412673,0.0036545203,0.0057149357,0.00008014043,0.000010269467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19232932,0.00004712957,0.000081510065,0.08247815,0.0064419964,0.001690073,0.0009747153,0.0005609683,0.000012341582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008358689,0.00008664008,0.7851616,0.000022466844,0.000017647117,0.0000015225825,0.009951995,0.000022953693,0.006536161,0.05097549,0.0015510025,0.14558895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015848936,0.00024853344,0.9613558,0.000044553435,0.000001008264,0.000006497863,0.03321735,0.0013206383,0.0003933683,0.0026786812,0.00051079266,0.00006431244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064736377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017222665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17619419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078501675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036523268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253915651","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-51824/v1","title":"Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iran University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Visualization; Social network analysis; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data mining; Social media","score_opus":0.8938435438003359,"score_gpt":0.7600975732063785,"score_spread":0.13374597059395743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253915651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66119134,0.00096057344,0.32453808,0.0024008574,0.0011608179,0.0014284926,0.0004541534,0.00007252992,0.0077931853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226487,0.00015997607,0.005796626,0.00003295741,0.0013049518,0.000020060554,0.00014515217,0.000028271203,0.0002471113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95495915,0.010008653,0.0032000998,0.001916261,0.028720682,0.0011951686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96035224,0.02192182,0.0012035159,0.0012601082,0.014557956,0.00070433016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15091598,0.0002410364,0.001442362,0.08392157,0.0011691583,0.0030977183,0.0039527523,0.0006850226,0.00052520615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20699984,0.00019836429,0.0013981818,0.31654394,0.0005492856,0.00030307937,0.006688564,0.0031947345,0.0000871589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009975209,0.00049281085,0.86830544,0.00018125301,0.0009876307,0.000025495068,0.0012599599,0.03362925,0.000084585365,0.020375665,0.026329206,0.048228938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029322313,0.00017915745,0.42559683,0.00007203578,0.00015584803,3.166173e-7,0.0012918232,0.51970285,0.00001366928,0.04821725,0.004201551,0.00027545082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047070594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060997674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4860736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024093494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018485463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254272619","doi":"10.1002/asi.21313","title":"Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Granularity; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.15404366209852383,"score_gpt":0.5017164090871692,"score_spread":0.34767274698864536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254272619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952792,0.00006694295,0.038738262,0.007851084,0.00012886425,0.00023432227,0.000015920004,0.000008764686,0.00016386877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196005,0.00008239158,0.007439633,0.00044388024,0.000024879771,0.000012978604,5.7994583e-7,0.0000014470482,0.000034187546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634546,0.00001671494,0.0006230182,0.00014504233,0.0026506046,0.00021915391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874632,0.0012641264,0.0015153661,0.00023185032,0.009407567,0.00011794223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014294639,0.00006447262,0.0002191165,0.012951434,0.00080160215,0.00096634426,0.0012068987,0.000051615865,0.0000051803763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018363021,0.00003876292,0.00016694647,0.13206893,0.0016962637,0.0022914985,0.00027511487,0.00026173305,0.0000032200614],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015748943,0.000035584922,0.05647589,0.000008709359,0.00014462069,7.905313e-8,0.0013226137,0.00003087203,0.03168492,0.045677196,0.002432613,0.8621712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023298243,0.0009793016,0.45825294,0.000014239493,0.00044195916,0.00016807773,0.08014686,0.12631886,0.016622564,0.050300367,0.26384383,0.0005812076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000048316087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000443759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86158997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004593582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002929296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254298080","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/835/1/011002","title":"Peer review declaration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Presentation (obstetrics); CLARITY; Library science; Declaration; Audit; Originality; Relevance (law); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Accounting; Business; Law","score_opus":0.3677454842294125,"score_gpt":0.4538333585619105,"score_spread":0.08608787433249798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254298080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552817,0.007734648,0.00045216363,0.012377996,0.00032206782,0.00018815047,0.00005026882,0.000016796823,0.023576234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96253616,0.011792516,0.00093312946,0.00070847553,0.000022281558,0.0000055434984,0.0000131399665,0.0000032122277,0.023985518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98921096,0.00009797026,0.00036289546,0.000788096,0.009058499,0.00048159485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976758,0.00022720553,0.00010443086,0.0005480936,0.0009377162,0.00050680415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009347989,0.00012350426,0.00020957642,0.002308425,0.0005579516,0.002159323,0.000946434,0.000045056528,0.0032460948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624935,0.00009096373,0.000049432678,0.0256282,0.001251975,0.0018211025,0.00081258244,0.00015239522,0.00035102275],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013652548,0.00011977299,0.018409403,0.000029286412,0.00000553088,0.00006369696,0.00030024024,0.000007238202,0.24367341,0.0054058204,0.00667732,0.72529465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025469455,0.00018514736,0.40457702,0.00006739638,0.000007690532,0.00018012198,0.0016171874,0.0007900272,0.15365069,0.0032553587,0.43505013,0.0003645357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014404596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029100855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035903577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031102137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254696421","doi":"10.1002/asi.20285","title":"The diffusion of theories: A functional approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Citation; Context (archaeology); Diffusion; Citation analysis; Diffusion theory; Diffusion of innovations; Sociology; Innovation diffusion; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1571127675202829,"score_gpt":0.4602075098049632,"score_spread":0.30309474228468036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254696421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92782044,0.0002627875,0.048736587,0.021472862,0.0002980089,0.00022915081,0.00001021508,0.000007892999,0.0011620749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308026,0.0003477501,0.006000985,0.0004427329,0.000039869796,0.000004189354,1.0785907e-7,0.0000013824732,0.00008271273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457556,0.000023884773,0.00069015793,0.00010040807,0.004364133,0.0002458655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895999,0.0013564777,0.0015627644,0.00033393688,0.007074201,0.00007270949],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022274127,0.000059522532,0.0001812004,0.005592714,0.0009036698,0.00053559634,0.002234419,0.00003886126,0.0000027431358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019373389,0.000024568175,0.000209091,0.08023848,0.0044495575,0.0016255905,0.00050209084,0.00020416791,0.0000020857804],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004061122,0.00003872799,0.006503583,0.000002901531,0.000018667632,1.3103329e-8,0.0006447338,0.000082898485,0.0022208313,0.0502954,0.01255004,0.9276016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012402699,0.0009021489,0.054176405,0.000012309838,0.000025258803,0.0001586213,0.064645864,0.05008943,0.0058348062,0.069654316,0.7530654,0.0001951423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031385696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.6278126e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92740643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008997659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054642546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982598},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4254700503","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2015-0073","title":"Embracing open access and offering greater choice for authors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.8505362065905454,"score_gpt":0.6242516246210477,"score_spread":0.22628458196949774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254700503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781576,0.00085407833,0.0012963074,0.0027892902,0.0017058376,0.00022466575,0.000016906148,0.0000020764992,0.014953265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957399,0.000007977809,0.0025019203,0.000236772,0.00017523556,0.0000017430493,1.3784755e-7,0.000004315274,0.0013320277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588966,0.000110458386,0.0005347058,0.0003508053,0.0025314023,0.00058296113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931124,0.0013868684,0.00034558444,0.00019882801,0.0025822632,0.0023740458],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032699253,0.0000925399,0.0002673295,0.025468096,0.0006005279,0.02003946,0.005598424,0.00005122727,0.00012347176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038843237,0.000058799684,0.0000633275,0.03987866,0.00043581324,0.004395897,0.00047695028,0.0001521384,0.000010973494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018354098,0.0000072247326,0.9426612,0.000003941244,0.000010252474,0.000033208347,0.00051555043,0.00044735285,0.00005621056,0.0013010512,0.010935281,0.044010337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010315191,0.00083028886,0.73025733,0.00005610213,0.000010071008,0.00017025336,0.0013987465,0.0053122872,0.000771073,0.045245536,0.21462916,0.0002876611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00500054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025082208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21240392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001912154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035437387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254735790","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.26672v1","title":"Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; Incentive; Public relations; Community engagement; Unintended consequences; Political science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.7906550923545302,"score_gpt":0.6520479813633714,"score_spread":0.13860711099115886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254735790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76012987,0.0006947,0.004638785,0.013138427,0.0023844033,0.0019956345,0.00026903258,0.00012284126,0.21662632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659306,0.00076065166,0.005329396,0.00066851,0.0009959363,0.000120761404,0.00005287859,0.000051079864,0.026090194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692598,0.0016403924,0.0017806817,0.0023394988,0.023144927,0.0018346995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829185,0.006796824,0.00046959857,0.0026646827,0.006275056,0.0008753624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503571,0.00044570546,0.0008543866,0.14316624,0.000335204,0.005920706,0.008752621,0.0008029101,0.0075698006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12709473,0.00032156953,0.0005106996,0.19830608,0.0005212522,0.0003108103,0.016812196,0.002282651,0.0022645004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022364213,0.0014783752,0.07378055,0.000109728804,0.00018652376,0.00013595307,0.0021336,0.0010577084,0.00064622576,0.010726617,0.67228156,0.23723951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002147948,0.0005423775,0.41984627,0.00010848132,0.000015069958,0.0000039108904,0.0018384699,0.027426451,0.0011701809,0.37001437,0.17539808,0.0014884032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012298875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49688348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011111915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255224140","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2004.9525886","title":"PhD Theses at the Margin: Examiner Comment on Re-examined Theses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.7929476375208562,"score_gpt":0.6496473897528601,"score_spread":0.1433002477679961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255224140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7049606,0.010940808,0.00018476754,0.23638982,0.0035956318,0.0005581228,0.000014914215,0.00002653573,0.043328803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916364,0.001061767,0.00018369983,0.0050571556,0.00021752177,0.00012170852,0.000002394563,0.00000868622,0.0017106711],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440867,0.000324897,0.0005234014,0.0005719596,0.0036587387,0.0005123065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733153,0.024020528,0.000076416734,0.0008193976,0.001588924,0.00017941049],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008368167,0.00015801295,0.00026069654,0.006095344,0.0005300363,0.0005795875,0.0011523917,0.000063297535,0.00041013607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13643336,0.0000806282,0.00007922746,0.03047956,0.0009397788,0.00021721974,0.0007212635,0.0002396623,0.0004910075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015145882,0.004308451,0.042975735,0.000056901466,0.00006442524,0.000020622481,0.008866755,0.00020110811,0.00023131582,0.23581547,0.3504798,0.35682794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007334112,0.00064775755,0.2679379,0.00016920887,0.000018777942,0.000009531443,0.07026304,0.00007751461,0.0023392867,0.28101674,0.37636733,0.0004195039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014184407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011297417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35640845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078503694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016316168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99012804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255320421","doi":"10.32920/14642139","title":"Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Impact factor; Process (computing); Political science; Data science; Computer science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.8007876750054489,"score_gpt":0.6287589678712654,"score_spread":0.1720287071341835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255320421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9049072,0.038557157,0.009486156,0.008525744,0.0008626129,0.0007505211,0.0017967296,0.000036544632,0.03507732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204315,0.012230773,0.0031192852,0.00022260693,0.00006470201,0.000030045972,0.00029060405,0.000014420178,0.0019844323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857599,0.00073941675,0.0015355487,0.0019301837,0.009441086,0.0005938373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776063,0.012700203,0.0005910829,0.0062422697,0.0025934803,0.00026664682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041868225,0.0002637567,0.0006980997,0.7319274,0.00014715201,0.0066900505,0.011885222,0.0003241356,0.0011502757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034226198,0.00015028288,0.0001731791,0.9024518,0.00030335164,0.0008062198,0.012463636,0.00089631416,0.000019985702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039847773,0.00035039315,0.26823375,0.000019299128,0.00002843059,0.000012972745,0.00017412577,0.00003064579,0.00008520488,0.00082859263,0.0634124,0.6668202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022138657,0.000038521943,0.9702316,0.000020692527,0.000015211241,0.000014498621,0.0006815132,0.0019082658,0.000040486622,0.0025764802,0.024052545,0.00019878372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020424586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079913397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7019979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058740505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004341326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255647893","doi":"10.4995/carma2016.2016.3140","title":"Validation of a web mining technique to measure innovation in the Canadian nanotechnology-related community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proxy (statistics); Measure (data warehouse); Data science; Intellectual property; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Data mining; Finance","score_opus":0.5503541756515045,"score_gpt":0.5194385616130678,"score_spread":0.03091561403843668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255647893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97255826,0.000008816795,0.0052728597,0.010749481,0.000057695786,0.0004138822,0.0000111984855,0.000016255053,0.010911542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982581,0.0000027514457,0.0011962695,0.00018890122,0.0000029767934,0.000030681298,0.0000012445705,0.000003268272,0.0003157921],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529076,0.00063815044,0.0006736862,0.00020399096,0.0028962428,0.00029715084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936285,0.0027713059,0.00015596481,0.0007470682,0.0026170276,0.00008011641],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05885772,0.00006596267,0.0001366688,0.090431735,0.00023354095,0.0002569319,0.0021520862,0.00019164517,0.00019182298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07257363,0.0000307293,0.00002636161,0.3043588,0.00011613766,0.00029917283,0.0002042653,0.00026241562,0.000061787374],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014853472,0.00013080156,0.20514823,0.0000028218524,0.000008554665,0.0000043188743,0.0012935163,0.000010712514,0.2551047,0.030941129,0.010494199,0.49684617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016010549,0.0008471218,0.4159441,0.000157989,0.000005994722,0.0000304628,0.007254198,0.0005112641,0.420741,0.122802876,0.029564863,0.0005390792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03128925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11898504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4963071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020272844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047814386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255944529","doi":"10.32744/pse.2020.3.39","title":"Migration of scientists: digital footprint and scientometry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives of science and education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Footprint; Ecological footprint; Computer science; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Archaeology; Sustainability; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.3431088610623212,"score_gpt":0.5447872252527376,"score_spread":0.2016783641904164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255944529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912898,0.0012802266,0.0005255945,0.0029765437,0.00015395004,0.00013191934,0.000009639297,0.0000053442127,0.0036270106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877393,0.00016921562,0.0008819497,0.00003814448,0.00003301298,0.000002156746,4.5156855e-7,0.000002121873,0.00009903635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942677,0.000023264945,0.0003412588,0.000628868,0.0045231786,0.00021570042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935088,0.00039681926,0.00023181044,0.00023788508,0.005252996,0.00037166482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006310365,0.000071071045,0.00016107823,0.015658826,0.00024304129,0.0012493167,0.0008175928,0.000026035339,0.00002400324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033122573,0.000053133066,0.000031567273,0.09512192,0.003447676,0.0014091127,0.00041492673,0.000067593726,0.0000049427363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025127161,0.00033753496,0.38427535,0.00002933765,0.000005251989,1.7994617e-7,0.020654123,0.0000052727682,0.08358523,0.016752506,0.0009638855,0.4933662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020162639,0.00036202246,0.8537378,0.000017063692,0.0000047248113,0.0000049205114,0.11279546,0.0037460558,0.0187129,0.00848404,0.001791515,0.00014188836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007566266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002132229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49322432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063802945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082328677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256241895","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/542n3","title":"Work it: Looking At Labour And Compensation In Non-Commercial, Scholarly, Canadian Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Publishing; Position (finance); Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sustainability; Political science; Public relations; Business; Accounting; Sociology; Psychology; Finance; Social science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5588967396540135,"score_gpt":0.5537658840576342,"score_spread":0.00513085559637938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256241895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96913385,0.0029017825,0.0007260233,0.012522741,0.0011607263,0.0003643687,0.000039608472,0.0000086968075,0.0131421685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888836,0.0013175796,0.0015214743,0.0016772194,0.00012476846,0.000011407195,0.000016262089,0.000017038898,0.0064306185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98844314,0.0005315096,0.001205313,0.0012334565,0.007695844,0.0008907433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99042046,0.002704739,0.00039839584,0.0010210747,0.0042339666,0.0012213492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036364224,0.00027128725,0.00068475195,0.11072515,0.0004847509,0.028088368,0.0024840906,0.0005617796,0.0058257086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02857792,0.00021882998,0.00015566127,0.13804829,0.000104983876,0.0011520423,0.00448876,0.0018027518,0.0002018022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071138184,0.000034775032,0.8777203,0.000010995841,0.00001554873,0.00013066057,0.00035622966,0.00018997336,0.00008008386,0.00006817805,0.018777952,0.10260819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027514342,0.0000134374395,0.9777894,0.00012872188,0.000003736171,0.000010701257,0.00060622493,0.0012627365,0.000093424205,0.0014168158,0.018119356,0.00028031558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18015125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5462463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36609504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012582615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001776378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280522756","doi":"10.3389/frsc.2022.832506","title":"We Have Sent Ourselves to Iceland (With Apologies to Iceland): Changing the Academy From Internally-Driven to Externally Partnered","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Ocean Nexus Center, EarthLab, University of Washington; Nippon Foundation; EarthLab, University of Washington; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Ocean Frontier Institute; University of Washington","keywords":"Excellence; Prestige; Sustainability; Public relations; Sociology; Relevance (law); Higher education; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Power (physics); Accountability; Law","score_opus":0.21511460786629857,"score_gpt":0.45916021267100127,"score_spread":0.2440456048047027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280522756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90667176,0.002035199,0.050612587,0.034805037,0.0011756729,0.0015040195,0.00014885445,0.00006047201,0.0029863701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848271,0.000108743894,0.004529729,0.0023098344,0.00020565341,0.00056245783,0.0000059188055,0.00003358688,0.107417025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990155,0.0005520769,0.0006778663,0.0010723217,0.005816557,0.0017261875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960698,0.0016567427,0.00020596097,0.0007525092,0.0007564771,0.0005584948],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008469709,0.00031701117,0.00058138795,0.03850187,0.00097218895,0.0026250142,0.004641714,0.00009052267,0.00039722296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047566015,0.00020274855,0.00013123546,0.054548074,0.00017854729,0.0004768385,0.0047344007,0.00068284053,0.00004567166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009502905,0.00012754349,0.37802476,0.000024052591,0.0001227497,0.0010079828,0.051607497,0.03426604,0.00007135545,0.001106824,0.4984056,0.034285307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005124929,0.00047198392,0.029167173,0.000032481425,0.000010356006,0.000008731322,0.49122012,0.001994055,0.00021110309,0.007550569,0.46845978,0.00036116096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012507922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018206514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43961263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008656808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027581558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280588024","doi":"10.1101/2022.05.12.22275000","title":"Academic dependency: the influence of the prevailing international biomedical research agenda on Argentina’s CONICET","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Institution; Political science; Psychological intervention; Translational research; Social science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7040941020838678,"score_gpt":0.6273682825226888,"score_spread":0.07672581956117897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280588024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796098,0.0008872229,0.00006288809,0.010693035,0.0035405322,0.0007615998,0.00022099694,0.000016673412,0.004207273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935918,0.0011349368,0.00006000858,0.0002667916,0.00023792738,0.000115984134,0.000010039755,0.00001930274,0.004563207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95651203,0.0029441507,0.0015651922,0.0014240121,0.036686614,0.0008679717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774705,0.0144937355,0.0009122965,0.0029481454,0.0038842952,0.00029100638],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10879667,0.00024190177,0.00041642945,0.02764121,0.00078948715,0.0010235015,0.023374133,0.0003812776,0.0032567864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15071966,0.000119922915,0.000408525,0.08610671,0.001272207,0.00017015211,0.021999126,0.0066372994,0.00023860332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025247,0.00056012394,0.8853004,0.00008877442,0.00020658171,0.00006392792,0.0019230273,0.0101935305,0.0065178215,0.0068008713,0.05106762,0.0371271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003117749,0.00012517495,0.7184908,0.00011675126,0.0000126598625,0.000010211376,0.0006442194,0.004705133,0.0012783131,0.031815305,0.24225037,0.00023929153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019256322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014285298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19118275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034422678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017210082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281255308","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04387-6","title":"Measuring the disparity among scientific disciplines using Library of Congress Subject Headings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library of congress; Computer science; Information retrieval; Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Library science; Data science; Scientific communication","score_opus":0.6099867867029692,"score_gpt":0.5220149078759858,"score_spread":0.08797187882698343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281255308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879879,0.0015075497,0.0013361184,0.00052365946,0.0053552277,0.00053315965,0.00029660552,0.000052499592,0.002407278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935462,0.000035789883,0.00087497046,0.000054386677,0.00008843888,0.000023520164,0.000013053303,0.000027988659,0.005335636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9656685,0.0009097184,0.0013897247,0.0015005269,0.029245835,0.0012857212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984528,0.007917204,0.0011270529,0.0023133033,0.0033797661,0.00073464296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07053809,0.00027002013,0.00055330124,0.15632807,0.0039363354,0.0077411365,0.00913916,0.000080132384,0.0012392598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044533387,0.0001722012,0.0003984683,0.67784804,0.0020639056,0.002198376,0.008683388,0.00074123207,0.000038542956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030800664,0.0003192126,0.9601827,0.000016292148,0.000021679974,0.000013142909,0.0005438753,0.0035693957,0.0020777837,0.0012293599,0.0125460075,0.019449735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009178443,0.00026934507,0.7697348,0.000025490062,0.00003962694,0.00003573169,0.0031927584,0.12977989,0.010902231,0.007883293,0.07650656,0.0007124588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021839826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025655732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52151996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029372665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007736293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996737},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4281566488","doi":"10.1016/j.niox.2022.05.003","title":"The silver jubilee of the Nitric Oxide journal: From 1997 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nitric Oxide","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Index (typography); Library science; Citation; Citation database; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.3062178411669722,"score_gpt":0.48677594134080604,"score_spread":0.18055810017383384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281566488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98935175,0.0029457402,0.0003863202,0.002768068,0.00088943384,0.00036518183,0.00016671768,0.000010399863,0.0031164088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98749053,0.000276329,0.0005189177,0.0006838959,0.00017426744,0.000034689296,0.0000020233329,0.000020706288,0.010798614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98103744,0.0011812499,0.0011855625,0.0006408053,0.015140289,0.00081465323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988445,0.014887894,0.0007012766,0.0018563964,0.00214784,0.0005221283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024744464,0.00019619692,0.00038502936,0.021999968,0.002026686,0.0017741915,0.008103365,0.000073074305,0.0026934217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04976738,0.000097569464,0.00045595522,0.2528767,0.00017770639,0.00027997573,0.0037816563,0.0010508692,0.0004776544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010876787,0.00028465284,0.1565707,0.0000017880058,0.00008285315,0.000050696533,0.00015881572,0.0010688081,0.017258752,0.00044582595,0.64755714,0.1764112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044537862,0.00006507924,0.4322346,0.000004447348,0.000018629295,0.00002863362,0.001553525,0.0006255902,0.0023968855,0.012848444,0.5495963,0.00018247306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006402252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021933649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27566388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034196634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283219711","doi":"10.2196/38935","title":"Published Research on COVID-19 in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Library science; Bibliometrics; China; Geography; Political science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Disease; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.8393217506797268,"score_gpt":0.7077956684685817,"score_spread":0.13152608221114515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283219711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74402076,0.0018828923,0.0024412966,0.23648602,0.0014915852,0.00065057905,0.000026715365,0.000008655509,0.012991494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547,0.00068354193,0.000023804816,0.0018432989,0.0006192827,0.00006541589,0.0000040030736,0.000016421654,0.0012742218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7412172,0.040716708,0.0030596314,0.0013680635,0.21139675,0.0022416352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34145716,0.60019773,0.0023002906,0.004728799,0.0435375,0.0077785244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57396406,0.00021509045,0.0008740495,0.8747602,0.0014362204,0.0056209043,0.021160731,0.00022881382,0.018334657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6883151,0.00011766104,0.00067879906,0.94256777,0.0012162661,0.0013031235,0.004483556,0.013559012,0.00021744112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018578317,0.002526793,0.0965257,0.000012309451,0.00032929698,0.008969193,0.0043349895,0.00048548914,0.000014448176,0.0010910173,0.6147153,0.26913768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033459472,0.0064648394,0.13249458,0.00006267654,0.000033160566,0.0010440436,0.06648905,0.028614374,0.000028881692,0.024131974,0.73699045,0.0003000092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014597672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001960901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.559481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025733078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050943037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283220805","doi":"10.1007/s40037-022-00717-9","title":"Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal &lt;em&gt;Perspectives on Medical Education&lt;/em&gt;","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Metadata; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.3729390460331222,"score_gpt":0.5601110664533843,"score_spread":0.18717202042026204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283220805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513281,0.012295006,0.00017407542,0.026831517,0.0028175423,0.0014873123,0.000022343207,0.000025593365,0.0050184885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933635,0.0013788033,0.00008594294,0.001934489,0.00079710816,0.00044464064,0.0000028414295,0.000038597194,0.0019540675],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9313866,0.0083170235,0.0016184289,0.0014615131,0.056153342,0.0010630989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93358725,0.036527496,0.0019413874,0.004396992,0.020294793,0.003252105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.108470336,0.00040026417,0.00074671983,0.20523307,0.0040241904,0.0018215083,0.006988083,0.00020035153,0.021291632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32135263,0.00020912448,0.0005431938,0.5120837,0.00090975,0.0005408703,0.0021496667,0.0039200312,0.000100391095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035608868,0.052548196,0.00863595,0.000021646732,0.0012016399,0.00019940645,0.3066976,0.0003021719,0.00010257632,0.021526227,0.26668367,0.3417248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010482554,0.0022462504,0.025107639,0.000033532222,0.0001414611,0.00064542383,0.952462,0.0015438036,0.000029561576,0.0040325215,0.012439771,0.0002697492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082503934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003132162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016875056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013238921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992147},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4283457399","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.13831","title":"How Open Is the U15? A Preliminary Analysis of Open Access Publishing in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mandate; Library science; Open science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Open data; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7234356462162446,"score_gpt":0.5724775161838102,"score_spread":0.1509581300324344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76003075,0.011292871,0.00013219031,0.22209084,0.00012376245,0.0004661671,0.000104096995,0.0000023420996,0.005756985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995679,0.0011393775,0.0007969324,0.0016176421,0.000016913618,0.000016595366,0.000012598002,0.000007804144,0.00071310886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916175,0.0029104475,0.0011429089,0.00029532038,0.0036919545,0.00034188564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890254,0.006436755,0.0014547748,0.0013906369,0.0012501117,0.00044233273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061238874,0.00010505126,0.0004911128,0.045579378,0.0010293953,0.16543077,0.043627597,0.00011623821,0.0003621887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028298689,0.000069426605,0.00013589559,0.14605564,0.00015639755,0.11056222,0.01872517,0.0023347638,4.9453547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012032741,0.00005670114,0.9298824,0.0000019086447,0.00012878586,0.0000060481416,0.003789508,0.00010268479,0.000026086725,0.0090675745,0.023280857,0.033537094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044797335,0.0001340434,0.8958734,0.00001699692,0.000059921957,0.00001109449,0.006923723,0.0022738716,0.000035548503,0.03469718,0.059436955,0.000089239365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04437505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008185272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23564827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016161628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283802616","doi":"10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14149","title":"Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada: A national comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Lagging; Political science; Compliance (psychology); Discipline; Momentum (technical analysis); Library science; Medicine; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5376084805342523,"score_gpt":0.5023064140048592,"score_spread":0.03530206652939305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283802616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98193336,0.0005344467,0.00008430384,0.004769085,0.00040024484,0.00016189086,0.00009376124,5.991246e-7,0.012022306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910307,0.000023971676,0.00010683007,0.0006566396,0.0000063825137,0.0000017223244,4.201792e-7,8.2815836e-7,0.000100108766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941161,0.00010755877,0.00074021047,0.000086455286,0.0047366074,0.00021301521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732393,0.00060004863,0.0005658047,0.00013586585,0.00095707225,0.00041727207],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014976857,0.000039901646,0.00011642354,0.019613521,0.00050581526,0.0043733413,0.008083475,0.0000074431005,0.000798042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065942663,0.000025645973,0.000017949405,0.06342222,0.00021942589,0.01602819,0.0011283635,0.00021900532,0.0000010910301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000891439,0.0000044839517,0.9500354,0.0000068296604,0.0000012571198,0.0000026974772,0.00069537986,0.004087092,0.00000498595,0.002925512,0.015519097,0.026708364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014803381,0.0000319096,0.9424856,0.000008006652,5.09194e-7,0.000026243235,0.0021805211,0.011115415,0.00008972547,0.0013207501,0.042552426,0.000040913925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3814228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28490916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096513614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003702256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042043403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977341},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4284704491","doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01397-5","title":"Public use and public funding of science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Open Philanthropy Project; Northwestern University; Peter G. Peterson Foundation; U.S. Department of Defense; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.7498465858020251,"score_gpt":0.5763100365894401,"score_spread":0.173536549212585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284704491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958977,0.00066945987,0.000038701626,0.0007514406,0.0005962822,0.00017777995,0.000066725384,0.00002494412,0.0017769508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981614,0.000011804397,0.0002707515,0.00011655786,0.000032170316,0.000013302508,0.0000056377407,0.000010435559,0.0013779682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.983685,0.00023420069,0.0005459927,0.0008838767,0.013854416,0.0007965221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931654,0.0012196874,0.0003399489,0.00092400715,0.0037473042,0.0006036666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026365463,0.00013107905,0.00025938745,0.07853998,0.0021621597,0.0047833095,0.0037679574,0.00011949501,0.0014134621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024419034,0.00010345248,0.00009700922,0.18941006,0.0011061267,0.0021196448,0.0035603028,0.0011799827,0.000009082086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028426955,0.0001709899,0.94686174,0.0000014765008,0.0000028510922,0.000011725981,0.00009175442,9.2636026e-7,0.0064791245,0.033602405,0.0045492765,0.008224895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032621462,0.00018423291,0.97670364,0.0000016412012,0.0000045162833,0.000027914664,0.0010621798,0.00014086746,0.0005243971,0.0031304823,0.017725775,0.00016814533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007504121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002828006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11087008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023549967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041508893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285099050","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100429","title":"Evolution of the thematic structure and main producers of physical therapy interventions research: A bibliometric analysis (1986 to 2017)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade da Coruña; University of Sydney","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Bibliometrics; Thematic analysis; Promotion (chess); Rehabilitation; Citation; Health care; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; Physical therapy; Nursing; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.45671230187067496,"score_gpt":0.5589605809942407,"score_spread":0.10224827912356577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285099050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99504805,0.0019434551,0.0010095092,0.0011073371,0.00015928994,0.0004930423,0.00016042302,0.000002940632,0.000075934906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.0001505593,0.00024613112,0.000028107848,0.0001543298,0.000010302097,7.3522824e-7,0.000013094315,0.00018490768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98519504,0.0020435676,0.0010441799,0.0004599768,0.010808471,0.00044874483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901443,0.004276439,0.0010256662,0.00093997084,0.0032902963,0.0003233267],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017851302,0.00017964396,0.0008478781,0.28482088,0.00042693768,0.00034274012,0.0032146706,0.0000415226,0.00027030086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008244754,0.0000950183,0.0012656949,0.72615343,0.0004968566,0.0003796407,0.0006964229,0.0007925708,0.0000034669206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001228685,0.005572791,0.07742067,0.00006877154,0.0016518051,0.000013576694,0.007895387,0.0073782094,0.3219545,0.0046404283,0.0148469135,0.5573283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021682724,0.0069438363,0.87758374,0.00007782989,0.00010852076,0.000030481966,0.004357137,0.00896896,0.023483347,0.07377314,0.0022134,0.0002913236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004933249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068275244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8001631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019742033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033433334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98703355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285156024","doi":"10.7202/1089191ar","title":"Bibliothèques universitaires et usage de la bibliométrie dans l’évaluation de la performance de la recherche","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.46655375761439644,"score_gpt":0.573577256834977,"score_spread":0.10702349922058052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285156024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255508,0.019552927,0.0509993,0.0060670124,0.0006088234,0.0006672779,0.00026461875,0.00022075194,0.096068524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77402806,0.18204089,0.023650397,0.0015840128,0.00014218705,0.00013040143,0.00006927263,0.0000764901,0.018278297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9324786,0.05362441,0.0013060094,0.0014661029,0.0093639605,0.0017609183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93054724,0.06581346,0.0007013737,0.00082062726,0.0013488171,0.00076851295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19076061,0.00050766795,0.000525194,0.34932098,0.001413164,0.04266511,0.0028719937,0.000737353,0.018730234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028203275,0.00052627403,0.00034328917,0.5576176,0.0013608892,0.020532316,0.0014621929,0.002564028,0.00012502578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037707412,0.0016081049,0.4979153,0.0001771074,0.00022351564,0.00031099122,0.021900725,0.013039504,0.020929918,0.047644127,0.23988077,0.15599285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031855535,0.0012590961,0.3695856,0.00016217717,0.00016474588,0.00049740396,0.016608689,0.043358225,0.018102445,0.11721484,0.4286762,0.0011850315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041996622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006510136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20829667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003859483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006662601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996454},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285385896","doi":"10.7202/1090527ar","title":"Aux abonnés absents ? Les sciences infirmières et le libre accès","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.8635168045882378,"score_gpt":0.7189879502636487,"score_spread":0.14452885432458906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285385896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32571185,0.094814636,0.00031936125,0.5439618,0.0049160654,0.0005352529,0.00009370817,0.000034192486,0.029613135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97901595,0.007704183,0.006621906,0.001064725,0.00011261559,0.00001351484,0.000001515523,0.000013686681,0.005451907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98110306,0.0013875408,0.0011806902,0.0015560684,0.013124989,0.0016476613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98854846,0.0049745506,0.00300757,0.0006808442,0.0017699159,0.0010186367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10020332,0.0002519732,0.0005499389,0.028003363,0.009879618,0.0065684486,0.0042815977,0.000092257345,0.0004550073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020140711,0.00021983765,0.00010466123,0.13711946,0.008781916,0.009524008,0.0019041109,0.0009872174,0.000018343473],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004486857,0.0011814354,0.019215234,0.000086843866,0.000008004322,0.000007533609,0.0034366788,0.00034192455,0.00035738322,0.087454244,0.022017669,0.8658482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001486814,0.005578114,0.21157768,0.0008142891,0.0000314573,0.00035804353,0.107917234,0.030674098,0.00052477774,0.07471598,0.56550646,0.0008150407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011942949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009984935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86503315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004137814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015611168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285388864","doi":"10.7202/1090526ar","title":"L’évaluation par les pairs des travaux de recherche : un processus essentiel, mais imparfait et mal-aimé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9141054657536631,"score_gpt":0.7089123506943387,"score_spread":0.20519311505932447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285388864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477641,0.06827505,0.0049695564,0.16378511,0.0017652131,0.00069944805,0.000062641695,0.00003520328,0.0126436865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927036,0.016134765,0.05423726,0.00048594803,0.00007406406,0.000029045925,0.0000029871076,0.000015915031,0.0019840007],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97983223,0.0059835794,0.001169297,0.0013235207,0.0099762045,0.0017151883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98292047,0.009843642,0.0025908286,0.000624314,0.0029545354,0.0010661954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2626817,0.00022492307,0.00045192655,0.016433576,0.0051435917,0.0024988274,0.0019984606,0.00016955935,0.0007204232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060340777,0.00020201791,0.00008729498,0.112367,0.0037558887,0.0033203382,0.0004933502,0.0013882007,0.000010875413],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000782471,0.0008401205,0.017017996,0.00017923862,0.000009749413,0.000006363891,0.013723589,0.00028571664,0.0009899501,0.0022258519,0.005006274,0.9596369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014855148,0.005452418,0.32262373,0.00092536624,0.00011473939,0.00054083695,0.17791939,0.07551933,0.0037252633,0.3730872,0.037797123,0.0008090975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040199016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008625771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015542224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011022092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989553},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285490980","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04466-8","title":"Scientometric portraits of recognized scientists: a structured literature review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Macquarie University","keywords":"Portrait; Scientometrics; Data science; Library science; Sociology; Information retrieval; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.4423497706215747,"score_gpt":0.5649995372104198,"score_spread":0.12264976658884513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285490980","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45691952,0.46987295,0.0047461623,0.003640614,0.016643472,0.004522085,0.0039129737,0.00030529828,0.039436907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963683,0.014189549,0.0064422474,0.0016464108,0.00013723849,0.00013118959,0.00013681436,0.00006159011,0.0135719525],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9337935,0.0012845664,0.0028235707,0.002651866,0.057525113,0.0019214149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713778,0.00540963,0.0021901133,0.0031631733,0.016285114,0.0015741899],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11765935,0.00045941147,0.0012589478,0.4470861,0.00156462,0.0028881703,0.010750653,0.00014708855,0.006618031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19142734,0.00035857785,0.00076208904,0.92149866,0.0007629203,0.0013587951,0.0052786535,0.001158069,0.00018072451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100950754,0.0013442521,0.06375939,0.00061255647,0.0000837021,0.0002205746,0.000637607,0.00024680689,0.0036903657,0.0037525299,0.35143647,0.5741148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043587787,0.0018786506,0.20685683,0.00073398324,0.00013493065,0.0007431741,0.00093674136,0.0039687413,0.0029563599,0.014246623,0.76117736,0.0020077955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022791544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038039282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.572107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007086142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011621525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988663},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4285536268","doi":"10.7202/1088349ar","title":"Open access in translation and interpreting studies: A bibliometric overview of its impact (1996-2015)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona","keywords":"Citation; Dimension (graph theory); Phenomenon; Political science; Citation analysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8350388835682824,"score_gpt":0.6703756137444059,"score_spread":0.16466326982387647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285536268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5160492,0.4815742,0.0011157161,0.000634182,0.00023632897,0.00016299663,0.00001894681,0.0000029736877,0.00020543925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72707105,0.27108517,0.0016263973,0.000058608362,0.000028911092,0.000005531054,9.1003176e-7,0.000012106045,0.00011129873],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913758,0.0013622984,0.0015111031,0.0006375738,0.0045513106,0.00056194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858772,0.007612441,0.0007510179,0.0005006622,0.004744242,0.00051443337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03945725,0.00021859672,0.0010573331,0.28607887,0.00020649532,0.008353052,0.003778284,0.00007928611,0.00059200183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060012773,0.0001359908,0.00037682563,0.67141205,0.00018028643,0.005295838,0.0014555461,0.00048797962,0.000008569104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050806397,0.00017289833,0.13788249,0.000066688255,0.00042769755,0.000106201674,0.00036487388,0.00010626361,0.0017988683,0.000076369826,0.0008754331,0.8580714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017675431,0.0004657985,0.9455562,0.00032433355,0.00025279858,0.0007253516,0.00086333335,0.002569799,0.0044432576,0.03318659,0.009444436,0.0004005617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007696194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095152565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85767084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014358804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003924007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285541547","doi":"10.7202/1088147ar","title":"Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Connections and Bridging Journals: The Evolution of Business Scholarship from 1990 to 2010","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management international","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Bridge (graph theory); Citation; Humanities; Sociology; Social network analysis; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.45204877096756485,"score_gpt":0.5574838491069153,"score_spread":0.10543507813935044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285541547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048142,0.002091135,0.064796254,0.008370391,0.0025379155,0.00015272731,0.00008839748,0.000011538129,0.017137468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887188,0.00019051513,0.0011609567,0.00008403108,0.00018390596,0.000010197512,0.000009210159,0.000005170211,0.009637218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957738,0.00010966518,0.00045974986,0.00042245648,0.0030420641,0.00019226255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446845,0.0012198464,0.00015206721,0.000383947,0.0036565044,0.000119185774],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065768007,0.00007961493,0.00012355827,0.011158461,0.00033191525,0.0024536147,0.0012876003,0.000035964324,0.0011899669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007674856,0.000055297838,0.00006653815,0.038086165,0.00009584917,0.0005749591,0.0019717487,0.00016198707,0.000167222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003109439,0.0002626645,0.8528316,0.000010304198,0.0001389996,0.000028507562,0.00022806629,0.00093169406,0.0014042049,0.01359463,0.018227788,0.112310454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024823268,0.000009021347,0.9659966,0.000040822582,0.000007291595,0.0000068338195,0.0007398218,0.004124053,0.00021396115,0.0116923675,0.016855093,0.00006585982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113312584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008565339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11316505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017153268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007108565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285796512","doi":"10.1108/lht-05-2022-0262","title":"Unveiling research productivity of premier IIMs of India (2010–2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Hi Tech","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scopus; China; Scatter plot; Library science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6213886299954758,"score_gpt":0.5628100067022828,"score_spread":0.05857862329319308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285796512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96739,0.0013471078,0.00010108951,0.001272164,0.0005720586,0.0004928193,0.00015634306,0.00002868921,0.028639706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797245,0.00007429959,0.0016268452,0.000019287394,0.00008507894,0.00003869468,0.000009156047,0.000018312832,0.01840381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98318344,0.0010620366,0.0008537618,0.0008765733,0.013371582,0.00065258535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198955,0.0048063663,0.00032272952,0.0015836555,0.0010657817,0.00023188737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030670203,0.00011710658,0.00038722123,0.056769054,0.00039003644,0.00034821098,0.0041081174,0.00008727399,0.010494645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015314763,0.00009206277,0.00014806676,0.27312714,0.00038924237,0.0013394586,0.005137131,0.00089983986,0.00009243712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018628426,0.0012059114,0.57395935,0.000057317724,0.000034849043,0.00003286837,0.00083995867,0.00014619378,0.03884424,0.0047120266,0.18827064,0.19171037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007732994,0.001367318,0.32985458,0.000028028147,0.000006140718,0.000017757015,0.0029066757,0.00180049,0.32164487,0.06817336,0.27302378,0.00040370354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057016765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.306721e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28280064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006416561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006689142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286839525","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0268433","title":"The General Growth Tendency: A tool to improve publication trend reporting by removing record inflation bias and enabling quantitative trend analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Inflation (cosmology); Data science; Trend analysis; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Data mining; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5806747774211096,"score_gpt":0.489541160675649,"score_spread":0.09113361674546061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286839525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927776,0.00045584622,0.0016805755,0.0034810607,0.0000895914,0.0003169269,0.00008166898,0.000030139792,0.0010865903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853333,0.00015469333,0.00803686,0.00015290042,0.000066699926,0.00012359906,0.000054146596,0.000013088154,0.0060646613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98999035,0.000479994,0.0015944393,0.0008926956,0.0065582804,0.00048422435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109423,0.0045746802,0.0017041338,0.00067580625,0.0017084498,0.00024266893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032433983,0.00013130018,0.00035565,0.028258663,0.0013758354,0.003308806,0.00089951616,0.000045308658,0.00017663483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13946241,0.0000916545,0.00012753265,0.16605256,0.000057101966,0.00072585983,0.00085441023,0.00030025147,0.0000098166865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012203807,0.00057119166,0.54971856,0.0000095409905,0.000679535,0.000009202263,0.00163754,0.000121521385,0.089165516,0.0025499135,0.007817962,0.3475975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012256909,0.0017582517,0.45312935,0.000022905406,0.0006623527,0.000008215171,0.0066022314,0.4842667,0.015219663,0.013035023,0.022895921,0.0011736942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042409907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002602121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4841452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020733106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010193417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287777058","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.09381","title":"Open Access effect on uncitedness: A large-scale study controlling by\\n discipline, source type and visibility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Subject (documents); Quartile; Scopus; Percentile; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Political science; History; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.6244240785590196,"score_gpt":0.4855437975336719,"score_spread":0.13888028102534772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287777058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702225,0.00014213998,0.024632761,0.0002633654,0.00052847917,0.0021628728,0.00019351518,0.00006385021,0.0017905424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964729,0.00008484144,0.00002640043,0.00013525545,0.00006651724,0.0000041106355,0.000025428617,0.000026657546,0.003157878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194807,0.0012703586,0.0005993042,0.003339285,0.0021489102,0.0006940698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98949903,0.005203726,0.0005341125,0.0019420258,0.0020021196,0.0008190069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016591925,0.00045186104,0.0010818957,0.01184277,0.0005581114,0.009515408,0.011706814,0.00030876894,0.000196555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015080623,0.00035192497,0.00020149157,0.08964172,0.00019922246,0.0011245526,0.03184399,0.0011484352,0.00017577985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017393242,0.0013986673,0.96674275,0.000056850466,0.00019100322,0.00019151843,0.0005565471,0.015543622,0.00007755176,0.000348185,0.0074395877,0.005714409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010176901,0.0041632075,0.2385038,0.00011576637,0.00028698848,0.0000019330598,0.0034958543,0.7086689,0.00019344808,0.02526872,0.0075339777,0.0015904946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053819566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016800083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72823894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026923663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035263764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287877402","doi":"10.3389/frma.2022.838553","title":"Closed Shop or Collaborative Hub? An Analysis of the Partners' Importance in CANZUK Countries' Research Collaborations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Developing country; Regional science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.7240881977782228,"score_gpt":0.6496951819978779,"score_spread":0.07439301578034485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287877402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845238,0.0048664697,0.001151723,0.0034650282,0.00055127806,0.0014975452,0.0013308019,0.000009607463,0.0026037435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239546,0.0024903275,0.0013420582,0.00006804715,0.000032424767,0.00012074943,0.00002715962,0.00001809814,0.0035057026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96753085,0.0058075218,0.0016014066,0.0012791379,0.022316512,0.0014645994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970652,0.01368765,0.00043750295,0.0019055512,0.012720818,0.00059652154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1270774,0.000207548,0.0009402069,0.19013302,0.0015032048,0.0016671364,0.0041852817,0.00016904388,0.00037623302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086079106,0.00014000127,0.00015266424,0.76235116,0.0014998256,0.00052172254,0.0023683591,0.0019701482,0.0000024224453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019469696,0.00043492133,0.95005125,0.000009783052,0.00012892406,0.0000638152,0.0012531999,0.0068097645,0.000022646442,0.0042230813,0.033637524,0.0031703769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011890691,0.0007559471,0.36278296,0.000010948877,0.000059152666,0.0000011939057,0.08868182,0.487192,0.000106916144,0.0076706936,0.051249936,0.00029938185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012472648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008441859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5872683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015525831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040132124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288047051","doi":"10.1002/leap.1468","title":"Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the <i>International Political Science Review</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Discipline; Peer review; Psychology; Politics; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.6844844918702782,"score_gpt":0.6041826932687399,"score_spread":0.0803017986015383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288047051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08163954,0.055242013,0.0003174909,0.8285184,0.0038151925,0.0006774748,0.00009813132,0.00004622558,0.02964556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629763,0.00492915,0.00055811123,0.028986314,0.00060853653,0.000087014305,0.000016696613,0.000018955023,0.0018189545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9106827,0.002983609,0.0026131792,0.0023408812,0.078869306,0.0025103255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9011727,0.06151995,0.0023761545,0.0055123605,0.026691232,0.0027276082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31249085,0.00020888663,0.0004875068,0.019473119,0.001493536,0.10715562,0.025999345,0.00007720692,0.0065895366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70295423,0.00013368533,0.0002489014,0.18263543,0.00035613868,0.027820984,0.0112930415,0.003288632,0.00012516632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017826927,0.00015264547,0.3784571,0.000009909524,0.0000142526305,0.000059360602,0.00064590015,0.00015676083,0.00031397797,0.007993617,0.5172792,0.09489945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005461789,0.000058160706,0.33022863,0.00070488814,0.000013305331,0.000053084317,0.0059758667,0.002948857,0.000046492045,0.017868632,0.6412084,0.0003474864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027089734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011177738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88133675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016444994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014913578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288061104","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.046","title":"Research on major depression in China: A perspective from bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Affective Disorders","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"National Major Science and Technology Projects of China; Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission; Universidade de Macau","keywords":"China; Beijing; Major depressive disorder; Bibliometrics; Depression (economics); Web of science; Traditional Chinese medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Medicine; Library science; Alternative medicine; Meta-analysis; History; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.29015105777763206,"score_gpt":0.5769470050974079,"score_spread":0.28679594731977587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288061104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856354,0.0034418495,0.0015568091,0.0011978382,0.00043114784,0.00030112942,0.0000633425,0.0000057947173,0.0073666656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916965,0.00034578185,0.0001336162,0.000050052986,0.00007067213,0.000023440101,0.0000023056766,0.000015465132,0.0001889994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746983,0.0035903812,0.00090642856,0.0008292751,0.019257862,0.0007177652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97551525,0.018413562,0.00073051755,0.00068648753,0.00425769,0.00039650628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05123043,0.00018615554,0.0006864864,0.8675453,0.0006644901,0.0009590408,0.0029982082,0.00008981978,0.0019312965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048674967,0.000132479,0.00060378877,0.9451449,0.00018588382,0.0006615069,0.0011548935,0.0021351846,0.000044163204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059310737,0.0014153661,0.8620502,0.0000011071562,0.0003491099,0.0000943202,0.0010920044,0.014093632,0.00022791413,0.00027843396,0.006150573,0.11365423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014437917,0.0013037606,0.9507491,0.000006052596,0.000038613314,0.0000039819847,0.01712738,0.0027338443,0.00011776833,0.025308678,0.0010235257,0.00014351262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047098966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079957774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11351072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014832439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040368896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288069887","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110997","title":"Peer review as a measurable responsibility of those who publish: The peer review debt index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Publication; Peer review; Psychology; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.8626940409841908,"score_gpt":0.6979094413014139,"score_spread":0.16478459968277692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288069887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010529394,0.9265266,0.000042482374,0.040722046,0.0010701418,0.0034565576,0.00008455247,0.0000074856075,0.028079579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000070941014,0.94202375,0.00021070152,0.0005341769,0.00025129115,0.00019556146,0.000009623823,0.000066043984,0.05670173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6822989,0.04547421,0.015601654,0.002338652,0.2515245,0.0027620501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4584678,0.20290203,0.020561382,0.017718209,0.2964764,0.003874177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6733062,0.00067173387,0.0063359183,0.05925559,0.00085947954,0.003728067,0.022337275,0.00043516792,0.01724693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7959579,0.0003219296,0.0035263726,0.31646782,0.0008869997,0.0014750964,0.0030123803,0.007698668,0.00061247643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002499987,0.00021625397,0.000043566095,0.021000652,0.00012719224,0.00004325286,0.000053536114,1.56367e-7,1.3855797e-7,0.00008742854,0.5048721,0.47353074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002660894,0.00049703906,0.00014218512,0.09562995,0.0002317119,0.000511785,0.00022457587,0.000012926602,2.9000816e-7,0.008258417,0.89395446,0.00027059772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011387117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007653893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47326013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010279756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011483505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288363742","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1904.12919","title":"Female citation impact superiority 1996-2018 in six out of seven\\n English-speaking nations","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Disadvantage; Promotion (chess); Citation impact; Inequality; Norm (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5314450835235536,"score_gpt":0.4130219790928477,"score_spread":0.11842310443070586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288363742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95823586,0.0002996085,0.018598443,0.00003379357,0.0036172126,0.0011661787,0.00044555473,0.00003377047,0.017569598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952788,0.001622523,0.0003015208,0.000013607543,0.00014872123,0.0000015115477,0.000048450853,0.000035650373,0.002549236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98939115,0.0012307806,0.0016188422,0.002894696,0.0035140177,0.0013505192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781324,0.008705871,0.0014686586,0.002505331,0.008441889,0.0007458024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018226162,0.00066201674,0.001357797,0.11945413,0.00045282827,0.0014525033,0.004908804,0.00095883175,0.0013208704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03404708,0.00066733477,0.0010312875,0.21272953,0.0006608693,0.002268077,0.003994774,0.0017083082,0.00053857476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796043,0.0006536645,0.8010714,0.0001249624,0.0001210175,0.000093333896,0.007163685,0.18327093,0.00021892185,0.004399653,0.000094858944,0.0026079565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374623,0.0005512541,0.61078286,0.00033760507,0.00009985385,0.0000024041583,0.009887593,0.36680526,0.00031567807,0.0050411737,0.0026376022,0.001164093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032392014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018382536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19028854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019809834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00222487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778517","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2021-0021","title":"Achieving a Professorship with Proper Academic Merit: Discouraging Questionable Publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Promotion (chess); Incentive; Public relations; Tracking (education); Process (computing); Position (finance); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5341701204214397,"score_gpt":0.515821418283463,"score_spread":0.01834870213797679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992071,0.004115651,0.0038125496,0.08192312,0.0017362119,0.00035046914,0.000022097809,0.000041578667,0.008791207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904688,0.00006543429,0.0044683274,0.0012145331,0.0007447962,0.000023044293,0.0000046943833,0.0000414604,0.002968938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96087575,0.0020501546,0.0021596146,0.0008217046,0.03291799,0.0011747677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97273505,0.004922251,0.0030829848,0.0008753324,0.017230842,0.0011535187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17744064,0.00026580956,0.00061447907,0.055080697,0.0021021904,0.250861,0.010402384,0.00021732315,0.00062756124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24481383,0.00016929767,0.0002511935,0.12489645,0.00014662107,0.28831613,0.0033185494,0.011970012,0.000013416232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033115063,0.00028719514,0.81449765,0.000025800646,0.00011510879,0.00034230138,0.0025032212,0.0031699028,0.0032829691,0.009666554,0.057758495,0.10801963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004921358,0.002030066,0.32431147,0.0005624912,0.0001082381,0.0038419554,0.056629978,0.0033747312,0.00045773794,0.036486793,0.5658622,0.0014130019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017998644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009463046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50810367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096283073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020797974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289847444","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608","title":"Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Factor (programming language); Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Physics; Law; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.7923014671715343,"score_gpt":0.6839056651468696,"score_spread":0.1083958020246647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289847444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894577,0.0033679553,0.0004058923,0.0038881712,0.00009367834,0.000242937,0.00011770997,0.000011332652,0.0024145874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966669,0.0014708707,0.00017134406,0.000113736474,0.00029310165,0.000013973495,0.000002543422,0.000009882748,0.0012576282],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809232,0.0012757998,0.0005369052,0.0005363147,0.015785282,0.00094254763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868378,0.00827443,0.00018538373,0.00039264586,0.0033264137,0.0009833003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04405606,0.00013307597,0.0002693198,0.11786532,0.0025299622,0.00505918,0.0013428868,0.00007280279,0.0008644135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10329687,0.00009311295,0.000104571736,0.16792162,0.0005759139,0.0010503606,0.0024789807,0.0012640073,0.00003176578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085187385,0.00010033621,0.4211299,0.000008437936,0.000039323142,0.000042384647,0.0009028744,0.00020510396,0.0008080257,0.009710792,0.020641908,0.5463257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079676736,0.0005503333,0.8222708,0.000005640596,0.00000197232,0.00024509695,0.0005669759,0.008472947,0.000097513104,0.039830197,0.12700202,0.0001597401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007781393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009974861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54616594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008057996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020868082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289947407","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6796","title":"bioéconomie en France. Une étude scientométrique","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Région Hauts-de-France; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3532287396621265,"score_gpt":0.5104410862932277,"score_spread":0.15721234663110123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289947407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07599918,0.048005067,0.00006912735,0.7988984,0.0014759848,0.00045551342,0.00010870533,0.0000043979135,0.074983604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95976233,0.015669351,0.000366634,0.0060497397,0.00039438548,0.0000138838095,0.000007809801,0.0000114140885,0.017724417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895047,0.0036144003,0.0010092884,0.00021976426,0.004754444,0.0008974274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98057723,0.014820713,0.0006596861,0.0003745808,0.0016523174,0.0019154816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06833917,0.00013625076,0.00024631032,0.031399425,0.003920568,0.010531282,0.0020580187,0.00013545738,0.0020197774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022520602,0.00009318223,0.000091130765,0.06766045,0.0014056724,0.040278252,0.0007922022,0.0025441244,0.00008826868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003313504,0.00009538092,0.018386917,0.00008102557,0.00012031179,0.00020414066,0.019661358,0.00064463925,0.00000809123,0.40871927,0.1891997,0.3625478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045066906,0.00059194374,0.008055554,0.0000232314,0.0000121286,0.00068584946,0.023893291,0.0019298428,0.000041690273,0.0063683465,0.95783275,0.00011472613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028732815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022489786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8837632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014979247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007692238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290546285","doi":"10.29173/cais1262","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Oligopoly; Agency (philosophy); Library science; Publishing; Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.40441269756483084,"score_gpt":0.5025465979353135,"score_spread":0.0981339003704827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290546285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176459,0.00023323366,0.000044519995,0.03689743,0.0006082269,0.0008180629,0.0003311945,0.000020611316,0.043400854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952937,0.0000671587,0.00017981342,0.00086191215,0.00008153009,0.000117790754,0.0000017112254,0.000019388488,0.0033770306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988986,0.00015446624,0.0010902293,0.00077551446,0.008091196,0.00090255466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6683719,0.0094945,0.0039526387,0.0021828942,0.31460696,0.0013910844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027384568,0.00024336223,0.0005475616,0.008188741,0.0014231704,0.18672621,0.049079955,0.00009682442,0.00032838449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39658353,0.00014141992,0.00024202692,0.06696718,0.000481455,0.044111717,0.039861206,0.0007295772,0.000012455159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038983824,0.00029928747,0.51587284,0.000037206304,0.00009056764,0.0000028794052,0.019586805,0.00005169081,0.0025936821,0.064830355,0.29292247,0.10332239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044976277,0.0003484255,0.27894258,0.000030636962,0.000016200322,0.000013755645,0.0075273574,0.00044646318,0.0059429593,0.04936454,0.6566427,0.00027467377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014109425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069287365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36919898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001805284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009618522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987686},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4290547061","doi":"10.29173/cais1245","title":"Factors influencing Canadian HASS researchers’ open access publishing practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Altruism (biology); Prestige; Test (biology); Variance (accounting); Psychology; Visibility; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Business; Geography; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.6978815989921062,"score_gpt":0.5439937719415102,"score_spread":0.153887827050596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290547061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946228,0.00019414948,0.0000047915405,0.011630291,0.000304118,0.00062173116,0.0004821424,0.000016094958,0.04051868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740434,0.000057527453,0.00013016416,0.0003897116,0.00005239371,0.000053303746,0.000005548153,0.000022863474,0.0018841395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878257,0.00026653352,0.0010579552,0.00088120287,0.008811504,0.0011570993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4715041,0.011910197,0.010001197,0.0020966132,0.5014367,0.0030511643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03238912,0.00027473652,0.00063678843,0.01848057,0.0012284273,0.17360933,0.0383428,0.00016002856,0.00079328235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6587914,0.00018832224,0.000219428,0.06823122,0.0005159641,0.09840728,0.021599013,0.001267248,0.0000050333815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007258553,0.00010494194,0.9278254,0.000033935215,0.000055956825,0.0000032105036,0.017045682,0.000022072358,0.0017312868,0.0036763723,0.037544973,0.011883606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044786616,0.00027853952,0.6672092,0.00005260625,0.00002078585,0.000012035415,0.035343338,0.0006691838,0.0048020985,0.010800492,0.2800452,0.00031866762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16000754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007085081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061817555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046151006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99635905},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4290779485","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0272730","title":"National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Scholarship; Political science; Bibliometrics; Information Dissemination; Library science; Business; Economic growth; Economics; World Wide Web; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.8288413072428364,"score_gpt":0.6094753142032667,"score_spread":0.21936599303956972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290779485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973632,0.00030513867,0.000017420489,0.00086951215,0.00002854374,0.00020713548,0.000135629,0.0000023730056,0.0010710193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969821,0.00012832873,0.00045201558,0.000043930384,0.000008715649,0.000034166816,0.000011399982,0.0000023250868,0.0023370285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254245,0.00018897967,0.0002919548,0.0003028185,0.006544493,0.00012929899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948699,0.0035198312,0.0001317056,0.00016526123,0.0012459925,0.00006734448],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062764487,0.00004624247,0.00017039113,0.023866901,0.0001207494,0.004895496,0.0022158925,0.000022769387,0.00060823996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021268398,0.000034369856,0.000016014184,0.09591553,0.000045019762,0.0019058293,0.003400848,0.00015634287,0.0000022530255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029439574,0.0010577181,0.98322046,0.0000086284645,0.000011070027,0.0000032585651,0.00033407458,0.000006830849,0.002341267,0.0016374167,0.0026411968,0.008708635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016402791,0.00007142049,0.9810648,0.00002617401,0.0000018185293,6.0190536e-7,0.00009989129,0.0069610206,0.000954275,0.010309231,0.00028852798,0.000058218706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005768081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016805463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072048634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047622216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007748128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291001315","doi":"10.1177/01455613221119051","title":"Does the journal impact factor predict individual article citation rate in otolaryngology journals?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ear Nose & Throat Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Citation analysis; Medicine; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.4754316964445302,"score_gpt":0.5500120337683365,"score_spread":0.07458033732380631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291001315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98957443,0.0019037067,0.0015974418,0.0044787405,0.0019440358,0.0002198049,0.00008618661,0.000009935255,0.00018570041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975243,0.0011028368,0.00014808725,0.00034549652,0.00055667164,0.000005628661,0.0000018875693,0.000018957096,0.00029610624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817489,0.0046799225,0.0014565293,0.0003796271,0.010641449,0.0010935656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122494,0.0048674196,0.0010070719,0.00045915175,0.0017471112,0.00069431047],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07154594,0.00021878135,0.00039713702,0.03008119,0.0023916722,0.0060733454,0.0036176837,0.00009348778,0.011437443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018050421,0.000095466785,0.0003605954,0.07027503,0.000210853,0.0018491836,0.0009787844,0.003343734,0.00014646645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021954208,0.00031189772,0.88819104,0.0000013253654,0.00010224926,0.000591457,0.0050108465,0.0036530404,0.003798048,0.000027405284,0.020931445,0.077161714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011861215,0.00064059685,0.9728858,0.000011077611,0.000013111179,0.002528532,0.003996412,0.0026995102,0.0002167725,0.011877637,0.0037877902,0.00015667982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046328827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035140216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08469473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005004971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080674165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291284117","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0271998","title":"Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Productivity; Gender gap; Pandemic; Demography; Geography; Political science; Demographic economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.9412418565429493,"score_gpt":0.6705717960623854,"score_spread":0.27067006048056397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291284117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99635005,0.0009382267,0.000024198396,0.0013261327,0.00007129175,0.0007356953,0.00020015813,0.000014630236,0.00033958757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911278,0.000040010815,0.0014972353,0.000008300955,0.00007539336,0.00020817014,0.000007301204,0.000013351758,0.0070224283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699169,0.002570615,0.0006924179,0.0013646925,0.024515677,0.00093971635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834812,0.009514691,0.00014092925,0.0009932064,0.005528588,0.0003413684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1085397,0.00012603213,0.00039756464,0.028395802,0.0020700651,0.0010038795,0.0014524969,0.00008298239,0.00038712105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04001944,0.00010141839,0.000041536106,0.13354038,0.00074899313,0.0005014573,0.0069320644,0.0013686512,0.000009558295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018542902,0.012248887,0.9626186,0.00004570672,0.00007853378,0.000025309702,0.007821606,0.000017302063,0.004345102,0.00020268402,0.0013287747,0.011082102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008657684,0.0012318832,0.9656197,0.000008068711,0.0000061648766,0.0000035020175,0.018934166,0.010490245,0.00044088694,0.002045265,0.00023452903,0.000119865486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038269887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009073405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10514457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013153568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002699114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291982736","doi":"","title":"A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Political science; Public economics; Psychology; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4513140322787154,"score_gpt":0.5260346446697138,"score_spread":0.07472061239099842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291982736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289218,0.000055487526,0.00025307309,0.0035135874,0.0006270278,0.000637174,0.00006555517,0.000015884283,0.065910414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179739,0.00008678402,0.000034233868,0.000096276824,0.00027871062,0.00000229383,0.000002227934,0.00002205456,0.08150352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936415,0.0010139847,0.00042184882,0.0013749577,0.005640888,0.0021841899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901372,0.0017493857,0.00030627675,0.0010565328,0.0036479717,0.0031026371],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008500346,0.00027550763,0.000458903,0.04005377,0.004204301,0.024128351,0.010518026,0.00017003922,0.00027450605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036856392,0.00022566406,0.00009761263,0.09715174,0.0023350623,0.0053581665,0.0038710928,0.001195173,0.00008961201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026846922,0.00009318191,0.9021432,0.000010982027,0.000061950814,0.0011592173,0.00019400638,0.0000033672109,0.0042910664,0.000259351,0.08823765,0.003277591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008442884,0.000769649,0.8986996,0.000047417067,0.00000949922,0.00022494174,0.0008847358,0.00011125845,0.005696054,0.0006508327,0.09175076,0.0003109933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38666764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3215717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06509593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014679633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034258387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99709207},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4292405002","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2017-0014","title":"Publish or impoverish","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; China; Cash; Originality; Bibliometrics; Value (mathematics); Web of science; Business; Library science; Economics; Marketing; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Social science; Advertising; Sociology; Finance; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5056988741162761,"score_gpt":0.5706104721088965,"score_spread":0.06491159799262036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292405002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17018226,0.00014945693,0.11577389,0.016769284,0.0058153477,0.000613188,0.00002593387,0.00002772736,0.6906429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97811717,0.00042017578,0.010399822,0.0007962506,0.00015936195,0.000001847995,0.0000016721183,0.000005045312,0.010098663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912385,0.000050696995,0.0011966808,0.0000971821,0.0071378103,0.0002791385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928515,0.00037697158,0.0020992034,0.00077238,0.003631811,0.00026811837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021219721,0.00008258979,0.00019937257,0.026441967,0.00043811701,0.015527901,0.0043362128,0.000043700435,0.0011208109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021487294,0.00004729499,0.00014210661,0.014424198,0.00006722735,0.013834313,0.0009223965,0.0001734078,0.0004988289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051849038,0.000027964918,0.009604289,0.0000075088337,0.000033993612,0.000023764665,0.00012402835,0.00004143337,0.0000018600244,0.0033223361,0.3405716,0.6461894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083832425,0.00011766209,0.20718333,0.000014006318,0.0000076046394,0.000021461414,0.001303517,0.0008455429,0.000055236444,0.0053548487,0.7841729,0.000085553555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007421194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027340805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8079349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000793873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088087305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292510728","doi":"10.6087/kcse.277","title":"Charting variety, scope, and impact of open access diamond journals in various disciplines and regions: a survey-based observational study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration","keywords":"Directory; Library science; Scope (computer science); Publication; Variety (cybernetics); Publishing; Audience measurement; Scopus; Diamond; Diversity (politics); Bibliometrics; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.8758646529958605,"score_gpt":0.6987223672361662,"score_spread":0.17714228575969426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292510728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973014,0.00029538161,0.00064735743,0.000643711,0.00033877854,0.0005268463,0.00007506624,0.0000048277952,0.000166653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.000018729534,0.0005229896,0.000046217934,0.00006332115,0.000035221863,0.0000026060482,0.0000058614582,0.000032824028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882758,0.0008414097,0.0010025034,0.0009631135,0.00829798,0.000619165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866342,0.0094007095,0.0008007158,0.0004806108,0.002329042,0.0003547117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1456589,0.00012480762,0.00035714198,0.024909163,0.0015711372,0.011212804,0.0057137716,0.000022630165,0.00018987588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10148537,0.000089564666,0.00004302696,0.18623446,0.0005427817,0.004489665,0.01155762,0.00034135976,7.9662175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001829931,0.00018937596,0.98716277,0.0000021190108,0.0000032040457,0.000007835682,0.0004844832,0.0012001802,0.00049507694,0.00005800324,0.00040539063,0.009973237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004984764,0.0002321219,0.9544928,0.00001577865,0.0000016820672,0.000005012376,0.0018899011,0.03842139,0.000045309447,0.0042803553,0.000015011218,0.00010213139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040865485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049870147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16132529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001691116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015994983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293160522","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-02312-5_2","title":"What Drives Serendipity Research?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Scholarship; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Everyday life; Point (geometry); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; History; Law","score_opus":0.32527453660856,"score_gpt":0.5099651811934768,"score_spread":0.1846906445849168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293160522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026612878,0.013458825,0.00022386886,0.0040395875,0.004839747,0.0021025492,0.0007895784,0.00025973038,0.94767326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4691382,0.09046515,0.00062980584,0.007840085,0.0033267178,0.0000950287,0.0004454704,0.00023550613,0.42782402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98079324,0.00046491946,0.0016852942,0.0011119194,0.014955781,0.0009888198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97435164,0.014464528,0.0011158615,0.0016447355,0.0077035846,0.00071963016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019743966,0.0006437412,0.00097325695,0.040957555,0.0013217678,0.016214432,0.0034889895,0.0010795619,0.010661969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013845521,0.00044883936,0.00033639208,0.014816572,0.0012577258,0.0055078566,0.0011291301,0.0013108421,0.004893295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016057334,0.00010097974,0.0003276358,0.0006676511,0.00043706317,0.000020015335,0.012595735,0.00004104874,0.000075279815,0.04490922,0.1715121,0.7677075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003013242,0.00047681064,0.0010218218,0.00046986633,0.000029730141,0.000008971063,0.0030779254,0.00064671854,0.0016335803,0.064223565,0.9274813,0.0006283846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005651994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077732264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7670792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002334268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039594146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293224259","doi":"10.2196/39365","title":"An Evaluation of Primary Studies Published in Predatory Journals Included in Systematic Reviews From High-Impact Dermatology Journals: Cross-sectional Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Dermatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Publishing; MEDLINE; Impact factor; Medicine; Family medicine; Grey literature; Data extraction; Directory; Publication bias; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.7449597743669143,"score_gpt":0.6623973011713971,"score_spread":0.08256247319551724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293224259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964667,0.03050346,0.00004287839,0.00033249517,0.0008670629,0.003407606,0.000070463684,0.000013577782,0.00009543519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980654,0.00038479906,0.0000875321,0.00012696598,0.000039617713,0.0012387959,0.00002246772,0.000016228554,0.000018162711],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93260604,0.036533084,0.008846189,0.0016202773,0.019230863,0.0011635636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97950107,0.010691037,0.0029268607,0.0013547319,0.00522611,0.0003001628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.113814965,0.0003032121,0.0025955676,0.063987754,0.00040072636,0.0011970135,0.0033171722,0.00022440411,0.0027711086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0687687,0.00021318652,0.00026452076,0.07393526,0.00023804723,0.002066005,0.001513511,0.0011309582,0.00004388716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000987291,0.0014890261,0.99197805,0.00028474652,0.00009861171,0.00014511215,0.0016569282,0.0011982449,0.00031191445,0.000014341901,0.0018303295,0.0008939801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00271722,0.00022326429,0.98061085,0.00011212908,0.000023976438,0.0005043672,0.0032576197,0.0049860617,0.000044723216,0.0072676074,0.00006359731,0.00018861107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031797602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040201415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046895072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001479972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010420382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983984},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4293243777","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00205","title":"Visualizing academic descendants using modified Pavlo diagrams: Results based on five researchers in biomechanics and biomedicine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomedicine; Graduation (instrument); Mentorship; Computer science; Graduate students; Completeness (order theory); Data science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Medical education; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.9158299019598442,"score_gpt":0.7019936612882616,"score_spread":0.21383624067158258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293243777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99099886,0.0030778851,0.0014140855,0.0026602277,0.0006717533,0.0005515304,0.00014222576,0.000024645147,0.0004587782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969696,0.0006424815,0.0019470617,0.00024657653,0.000020799964,0.000034104847,0.0000022053935,0.0000112976995,0.00012588604],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818569,0.0010813702,0.0009766513,0.0016105104,0.013265756,0.0012088063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98173577,0.014267485,0.00044667316,0.0006043065,0.002500341,0.00044540665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0847663,0.000236474,0.0005234065,0.07057562,0.0020913868,0.0005584366,0.0023184856,0.00005516148,0.000021449958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14722951,0.0001693497,0.00006628846,0.2401663,0.0030696082,0.00078338676,0.0024701878,0.0008076939,0.000013373472],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005114463,0.0023083293,0.076190196,0.00018026766,0.00022482689,0.0008918157,0.10172893,0.04116912,0.36481088,0.055176947,0.012035403,0.3401688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018641591,0.0020389112,0.0121098915,0.0000929862,0.000006232604,0.000004224953,0.10428704,0.86441606,0.0024891193,0.011856399,0.00048018814,0.0003547722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002651174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029823479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82324696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007540136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006991132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293371014","doi":"10.54674/ess.v16i2.659","title":"Scholarly communication strategies in Latin American´s research-intensive universities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Context (archaeology); Political science; Credence; SciELO; Publishing; Convergence (economics); The Internet; Inclusion (mineral); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Economic growth; MEDLINE; Geography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.4918938278604118,"score_gpt":0.5702774535091364,"score_spread":0.07838362564872459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293371014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753776,0.009810903,0.000130027,0.0043513924,0.00025894988,0.0004168093,0.000038937193,0.000040891144,0.009574488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925189,0.0017884026,0.001306944,0.00023405833,0.00015121853,0.000028441573,0.000015119304,0.000028004979,0.0039289305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874492,0.0020670549,0.0008889605,0.0007460039,0.0072610877,0.0015876498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823161,0.0069346246,0.0002846706,0.0017495769,0.008008383,0.0007066445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03149709,0.00027120142,0.0006683588,0.023777992,0.0008918459,0.0105653135,0.003599986,0.00017949512,0.000886986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020135585,0.00022561182,0.00024484567,0.11184349,0.0018747116,0.0065706032,0.0013793997,0.0015229828,0.00092769467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009892182,0.000679069,0.72311074,0.00006053623,0.00006611999,0.000039849045,0.031084497,0.000022144144,0.003982552,0.14081575,0.035771236,0.06426859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036278352,0.0001281758,0.35745898,0.00006462961,0.000007907768,0.0000107284095,0.4794937,0.00016278274,0.00016131924,0.002068653,0.15972035,0.00035997597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001953928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007509721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4484092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010674031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016214673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293438325","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2022.08.002","title":"Leading International Research and Educational Collaborations – A Perspective on Successful Partnerships","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Direktoratet for internasjonalisering og kvalitetsutvikling i høgare utdanning","keywords":"Scopus; Internationalization; Expansive; Generalizability theory; Globe; International business; Political science; Web of science; Library science; China; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5722400607594209,"score_gpt":0.638129832942012,"score_spread":0.06588977218259107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293438325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5116324,0.0050619333,0.0004251262,0.47398648,0.0019636,0.000089584544,0.000013647671,0.0000041346207,0.0068231043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973929,0.0009202017,0.00021401899,0.0004680914,0.0004323739,0.0000048977568,6.479431e-7,0.000002539307,0.00056433555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806776,0.0006144964,0.00050575327,0.00033816343,0.017609043,0.00025492546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852932,0.010442588,0.00034846243,0.00010835304,0.003352123,0.00045526613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05894303,0.00006194367,0.00015156694,0.020963566,0.0014983915,0.002227214,0.0014529165,0.000027225136,0.00093449804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06407799,0.000042073843,0.000036524987,0.034458946,0.00093849254,0.00080961146,0.000399004,0.0006289192,0.000008164623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075999036,0.0005242118,0.35496587,0.0000034396132,0.000033405864,0.00004924405,0.0041873297,0.00038634767,0.00016876997,0.23649246,0.22954236,0.17357054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019703943,0.001256448,0.14076991,0.00005922502,0.0000102194845,0.000736514,0.23637874,0.094306834,0.00009804782,0.19396384,0.33014074,0.0003090976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029876726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005727065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4857605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013513016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295292813","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.4729","title":"Recalibrating the Scope of Scholarly Publishing: A Modest Step in a Vast Decolonization Process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Political science; Indonesian; Diversity (politics); Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Social science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.6357457308456576,"score_gpt":0.5771400541725193,"score_spread":0.05860567667313821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295292813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296195,0.0032246106,0.04270442,0.0084239645,0.0014083398,0.0023139233,0.00015978537,0.00006913552,0.11207627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941492,0.00024158803,0.0034237008,0.00022022317,0.000056799836,0.0001613486,0.000030130836,0.000022231505,0.0016947455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774922,0.0012121769,0.0017907589,0.0013655599,0.01753456,0.0006047512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221457,0.006925761,0.0011499453,0.0016646811,0.007807862,0.00023716419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07036519,0.00022290136,0.0005249335,0.06810444,0.00035700764,0.04835534,0.009855007,0.0003371107,0.0022024743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20882541,0.00013370108,0.0001671082,0.28042325,0.00014568513,0.0077819205,0.009420492,0.0025201312,0.000015795713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008046135,0.0007537543,0.649422,0.00015930124,0.00004774328,0.00002268295,0.0018445961,0.0644813,0.00015049004,0.008075171,0.017972397,0.2569901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011234913,0.00028990643,0.18145497,0.00017758462,0.000016434404,0.000006847201,0.0073931315,0.70229936,0.00077479414,0.098563,0.007163791,0.00073668384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011223137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040277344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63781804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002762644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002095174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295828382","doi":"10.16995/dscn.8090","title":"Neither Computer Science, nor Information Studies, nor Humanities Enough: What Is the Status of a Digital Humanities Conference Paper?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Studies / Le champ numérique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Library science; Discipline; Political science; Art; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4185581352450671,"score_gpt":0.4570787733583697,"score_spread":0.03852063811330264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295828382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519574,0.015426214,0.0010752339,0.0032591333,0.001989301,0.0010514391,0.0015626899,0.00008472733,0.02359384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239475,0.0038464812,0.000017148706,0.0010154312,0.000107543456,0.00013115395,0.000026006268,0.000015766207,0.0024457462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890157,0.00013942046,0.0012516937,0.0006684487,0.00772784,0.0011969064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880144,0.003416313,0.0006802704,0.00084812316,0.0068558673,0.00018501357],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005173565,0.00034157795,0.0006830714,0.009411584,0.0027618262,0.011641722,0.0027613016,0.000046250214,0.00016526908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065134065,0.00021547294,0.00023359973,0.03288759,0.0029462853,0.013364046,0.0054964796,0.0003853089,0.00008543676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101190526,0.0004336721,0.011994337,0.00008330125,0.0004115211,0.0000139614785,0.7105841,0.00017710618,0.000033469154,0.0055560083,0.022808684,0.24780266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035280825,0.0004245209,0.0018452444,0.00002194191,3.995266e-7,0.000008135093,0.72807264,0.00030760898,0.00013930001,0.008029776,0.26055497,0.00024265182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111001296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096837604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24756001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051205524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077135535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296539606","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8381","title":"Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; Athabasca University; Harvard University","keywords":"Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.8871000252645174,"score_gpt":0.7233945560857794,"score_spread":0.16370546917873796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296539606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.6237847e-7,0.9282419,0.00017076483,0.0037452437,0.0026907946,0.0027482572,0.00033388505,0.00006119858,0.062007777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000010281678,0.96087146,0.00034145993,0.0030903025,0.0009846962,0.0003389855,0.00033337084,0.000091862195,0.033946835],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97270745,0.0031332793,0.0036519994,0.0032345052,0.015746135,0.0015266064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96932185,0.0138268145,0.0030870882,0.005823817,0.006409754,0.0015306966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08252472,0.0009405626,0.005731112,0.0754039,0.00046344896,0.19565062,0.06984469,0.0011630274,0.0040516127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22167586,0.0005524058,0.0018392887,0.42191246,0.00018120412,0.014416123,0.028231522,0.0027774004,0.0049292017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001637267,0.000043934328,0.0000065300155,0.007661161,0.000034790926,0.000043672837,0.0000073824217,8.109324e-8,4.754881e-9,0.00078920455,0.4337277,0.5576839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002165426,0.00006457755,0.0000116597685,0.061436035,0.00015453518,0.00009345415,0.0000035698977,0.000016860018,8.402206e-8,0.0033903844,0.9339715,0.0006407999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086261745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021511336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5570431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039150348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020613854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613330","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2022.07.003","title":"Extra credit for disruption: trend of disruption in radiology academic journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Radiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Statistics; Citation impact; Relation (database); Impact factor; Actuarial science; Library science; Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7701364793812381,"score_gpt":0.6740212663400368,"score_spread":0.0961152130412013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97803146,0.0054878066,0.0077592847,0.004022834,0.0035828475,0.00043362082,0.00016167175,0.000013100741,0.00050740637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950572,0.0023118404,0.0006127455,0.00033755775,0.00064528384,0.00009884139,0.000027289125,0.000011746738,0.0008974899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99025524,0.0025886106,0.0030790563,0.0009654755,0.0023599525,0.0007516512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96083623,0.036728747,0.00092571817,0.0006289694,0.00052288774,0.00035744847],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06977489,0.00014763827,0.0009771613,0.021649813,0.00022957766,0.00007906797,0.0025399523,0.00039424983,0.001965168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08900467,0.000112303234,0.0004644325,0.041903365,0.0006668741,0.00022680582,0.00073200586,0.001372198,0.000029540337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055748026,0.00033251505,0.63774693,0.0000045860124,0.000029142195,0.000027988128,0.00012459706,0.000618727,0.00093582243,0.0038711096,0.03680982,0.3189413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00275747,0.0026355195,0.7659264,0.0000057876596,0.0000149326515,0.00026236707,0.00053750764,0.010194558,0.00002284445,0.0657745,0.15165022,0.00021789552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009347481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012900876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3187234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014983745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023841923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298394588","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7","title":"Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Hyperlink; Recall; Information retrieval; Precision and recall; Data science; World Wide Web; Web page; Psychology","score_opus":0.7616169543367562,"score_gpt":0.6597713076679573,"score_spread":0.10184564666879892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298394588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860672,0.0011251702,0.006355869,0.00095172465,0.0017810067,0.00088316837,0.00018557416,0.000008784271,0.0026415267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579805,0.00034495318,0.0033957348,0.000115652816,0.00002387667,0.000012611542,0.000010223336,0.00000858715,0.00029032238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9509261,0.0020827895,0.0018104007,0.0018979338,0.04235292,0.00092985004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816661,0.008195607,0.0014158279,0.005284611,0.0030581926,0.00037968747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16984177,0.00017562123,0.00040827377,0.14689842,0.0011239502,0.0023540272,0.018554589,0.000058764163,0.0001821811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07125832,0.00009843199,0.000113433125,0.69999915,0.0010668329,0.0022650086,0.01209999,0.0006025096,0.0000034254895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001575604,0.0007958868,0.6743179,0.000014297672,0.000005897927,0.0000030820067,0.0008974765,0.0005168184,0.0035122053,0.0018481821,0.0033508716,0.3147216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006076434,0.00039994094,0.923167,0.000012490357,0.000013391507,0.000012459401,0.0060253874,0.05746128,0.00041469664,0.0045659267,0.007156623,0.00016316297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007336157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011449173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5531007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036538567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009598248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299121301","doi":"10.1017/s0269889708002044","title":"Journals under Threat: A Joint Response from History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Editors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science in Context","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Rendering (computer graphics); Meaning (existential); Field (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Joint (building); Data science; Engineering ethics; Work (physics); History of science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; History; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Architectural engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.5139643010748699,"score_gpt":0.5557706272441338,"score_spread":0.04180632616926394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299121301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96917456,0.0063105286,0.00043190664,0.015347268,0.0033126024,0.00017564204,0.0000057504735,0.000016315538,0.0052254484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763924,0.00015463757,0.00046332125,0.00040747045,0.00015560283,0.0000023513821,7.889886e-8,0.000003215161,0.0011740688],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855323,0.00016325933,0.0010149475,0.0010823322,0.011427823,0.0007793807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913572,0.003014478,0.0004381556,0.0009652665,0.0036920265,0.0005328386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08080785,0.00015154724,0.00048004035,0.1970215,0.00036661327,0.00048403192,0.0039623254,0.000119460485,0.00044284642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10928307,0.000097232776,0.000049418497,0.29781747,0.018488165,0.0015983105,0.00066798803,0.00040805718,0.000029595156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018624477,0.00018942814,0.048804775,0.0000013080327,0.0000029005591,0.00003381903,0.0025095344,0.00001923467,0.5533532,0.00852147,0.028378772,0.35799935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010431104,0.0008485777,0.78000367,0.000119066375,0.0000037042964,0.00002054722,0.00921228,0.0018317889,0.007909044,0.17459604,0.024174262,0.00023788601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024318876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027995553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7311989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094562763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028888267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98418295},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4299531191","doi":"10.29173/istl1641","title":"A Triangulation Method to Dismantling a Disciplinary \"Big Deal\".","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triangulation; Citation; Discipline; Computer science; Multidisciplinary approach; Process (computing); Data science; Collection development; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6532942975664449,"score_gpt":0.6049524094968264,"score_spread":0.04834188806961848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299531191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8996397,0.0015863952,0.03586497,0.053542156,0.0005795879,0.0005541893,0.0000072385587,0.0001534478,0.008072289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454936,0.000020147228,0.053255647,0.00018652451,0.000081213846,0.00003085883,6.8171045e-7,0.00000908467,0.00092227024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178195,0.00020921728,0.000644271,0.0012133288,0.0053333733,0.00081786176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531436,0.0014852383,0.0001380215,0.0009141506,0.0015059859,0.00064223935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043485664,0.0001620892,0.00036617287,0.08007802,0.0003471763,0.0023644725,0.0034762411,0.00022635357,0.000022238848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049753077,0.000117054406,0.000030835297,0.29344758,0.0009625207,0.0018827794,0.002355066,0.00035284375,0.0001201645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043159333,0.00007588248,0.2907322,0.000002533513,0.0000022650063,0.000049543396,0.0015023705,0.000054497872,0.0017490406,0.043317482,0.0018685921,0.6606024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010446367,0.00053930626,0.1398875,0.000038361057,0.0000043181267,0.000051764815,0.008242193,0.016068961,0.007649807,0.7819639,0.04408204,0.00042723282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069033056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003441183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012909723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070516276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299827348","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4599377","title":"Portage : Soutenir l'innovation canadienne par le partage d'expertise et la gestion des données de recherche","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; Compute Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Arizona Biomedical Research Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8083091375217816,"score_gpt":0.5080129369751235,"score_spread":0.30029620054665807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299827348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19789201,0.0033817606,0.045928232,0.007282278,0.0012370783,0.0019236017,0.0022057786,0.0009841841,0.73916507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635914,0.013700592,0.007572898,0.00051532086,0.00091022043,0.0000014972543,0.006137778,0.0040734857,0.10349681],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97932017,0.007857463,0.0016164769,0.0017187588,0.007606141,0.0018809807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646203,0.0017320573,0.0009820394,0.0016140254,0.029504618,0.0015469819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14020327,0.0005481798,0.0007060248,0.026009908,0.004065165,0.0111407535,0.0049973163,0.0011285855,0.01070425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.234538,0.00052756,0.00022479585,0.08817048,0.0012450813,0.0015071223,0.0037414958,0.0025472527,0.0050262255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070869195,0.00041698274,0.0002002719,0.00014240018,0.00008274811,0.00022594653,0.0030919758,0.00015066192,0.0025553193,0.0065057413,0.26603216,0.7205249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072557415,0.00046105296,0.006313903,0.00020373578,0.00003582567,0.0006847382,0.0017034573,0.0018870806,0.00044959816,0.0075039715,0.97945726,0.00057381793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065809875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026750908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7199511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056956424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012024608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300077040","doi":"","title":"Editorial ~ Open Access in Action!","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.8683670175834487,"score_gpt":0.7683886591587825,"score_spread":0.09997835842466618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300077040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8602945,0.0060579237,0.000852062,0.000927397,0.06453206,0.0015507519,0.00013242148,0.000035880024,0.06561701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97568154,0.0047452576,0.00026372954,0.00020769166,0.014227789,0.00008152066,0.000013304789,0.000050886574,0.0047282754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818811,0.0008906036,0.0023717321,0.0012969933,0.012547335,0.0010122252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874047,0.0050099827,0.0016351109,0.0013170708,0.0040071188,0.0006260077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035365265,0.0003714131,0.0011804203,0.07251709,0.0005393396,0.07462605,0.041037574,0.0002789277,0.026144559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01976166,0.00028433875,0.00028468354,0.17746457,0.00025293854,0.022007648,0.016773958,0.0009376511,0.0002089322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013024172,0.0003215418,0.4316058,0.0000059688477,0.000016236376,0.000018724071,0.000012165898,0.00020186562,0.004704025,0.00012335731,0.5363873,0.026472751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008562783,0.000012422473,0.6608383,0.000051533578,0.0000082885,0.0000042178617,0.000050059803,0.00017548056,0.004742191,0.046277642,0.28666708,0.00031647208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016980743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001105258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24972026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039047177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008386737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300961310","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/kcqem","title":"Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Grey literature; Science policy; Experiential knowledge; Gray (unit); Systematic review; Political science; Management science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Computer science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Economics; Engineering; Public administration; Medicine","score_opus":0.7368827277211017,"score_gpt":0.6745924479329825,"score_spread":0.062290279788119296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300961310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3466773,0.24531665,0.055774186,0.03020022,0.0047851643,0.08859311,0.016275907,0.00025729692,0.21212016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739337,0.024626557,0.07029863,0.0007289936,0.0011988772,0.01030004,0.00014325538,0.00009902218,0.018670985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811481,0.00034341522,0.0017345777,0.0026205182,0.012765106,0.0013882674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521861,0.023041876,0.00096830534,0.0020244415,0.020888919,0.00089035864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16604917,0.00035664937,0.0011863344,0.15269507,0.0015751376,0.005496279,0.006238301,0.00074974564,0.0002526018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27769354,0.0002241486,0.0002891113,0.35188487,0.0015515474,0.00049460883,0.009851444,0.002685752,0.000005124276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045704213,0.0005812869,0.0015818228,0.008383193,0.00006332353,0.00005010476,0.0047811954,0.000072345305,0.002952686,0.16394171,0.25683862,0.56029665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010840374,0.0006456514,0.0002316728,0.00013255475,0.000024658562,0.00012480876,0.0022286393,0.0012602961,0.004370276,0.49820796,0.49110642,0.0005830042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010075415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035609402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55971366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003230387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052457247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301494992","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1304.7300","title":"Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric\\n community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Bookmarking; Social media; Citation; Tracking (education); Scopus; Download; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Online community; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.66106799496116,"score_gpt":0.40475966634702015,"score_spread":0.2563083286141398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301494992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846319,0.0009892557,0.009219698,0.00010032877,0.00024641625,0.00050686597,0.00007889551,0.000016579495,0.004210041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946851,0.0045172176,0.00010602423,0.00006805843,0.000028049599,0.0000015897062,0.000015050867,0.000011117272,0.0005677612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932176,0.0020873193,0.0007112208,0.00086779246,0.0025974542,0.0005186161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98027325,0.0141049335,0.0008329695,0.0020566545,0.0024596949,0.00027248665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027477782,0.00027912468,0.0006002498,0.43569446,0.00033318665,0.0016170444,0.005661313,0.00042141575,0.0001332813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018063365,0.00020010273,0.00023058066,0.68353826,0.0005020033,0.00064068474,0.0044560474,0.0017978806,0.000087946035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006079871,0.00081630924,0.91647106,0.00012195713,0.000060255436,0.000071961185,0.0009848044,0.020143135,0.00003968063,0.014954079,0.0031926492,0.04308331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072273094,0.00022415316,0.8599948,0.00003983095,0.000032487373,0.0000047848825,0.003172714,0.03964179,0.000040074094,0.09405531,0.0017295955,0.00034168517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032753998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012587603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2478438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015706521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018944702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302027384","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2108920/v1","title":"Techniques predatory journals use to solicit manuscripts: a contrast between Africa (lower- income countries) and Canada (high income country)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; MicroResearch","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.43964109730457085,"score_gpt":0.5436568410953451,"score_spread":0.10401574379077422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302027384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597957,0.004753274,0.0007540068,0.0064397547,0.0014733764,0.004947342,0.018300012,0.00016268589,0.0033738413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882503,0.0023488891,0.0007209633,0.000336541,0.0006053847,0.0006701965,0.00007662395,0.000104662744,0.0068864194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94296896,0.0033186094,0.002282744,0.0027313656,0.045704555,0.0029937744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95733434,0.020900244,0.00072154345,0.003375301,0.014559456,0.0031090917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07385631,0.0007266749,0.0017316821,0.08301059,0.0019933572,0.016700527,0.008991889,0.0007373277,0.0046943408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06837624,0.0005998361,0.00024683695,0.093298264,0.0006861309,0.0010890696,0.02252647,0.005922473,0.00008335066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027402627,0.00014922,0.7577138,0.00044629732,0.00021988021,0.00081014814,0.0003842135,0.00008125226,0.00006849953,0.0006659779,0.22999161,0.009195073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033640434,0.0005315295,0.39490056,0.00035910343,0.000014244702,0.000010537827,0.00045774263,0.00010588213,0.00010216246,0.0033786274,0.5992043,0.00059890916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5694511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18880321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3806479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004297902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008745584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996453},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4302779981","doi":"10.1177/014107680609900928","title":"Open access: The evidence and the verdict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6120814298794245,"score_gpt":0.6113124180490181,"score_spread":0.0007690118304063409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302779981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35247326,0.038316444,0.0029246714,0.59706277,0.001475336,0.0006265316,0.00000445263,0.0000029680164,0.007113592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247515,0.0016320106,0.00017304096,0.0018180296,0.0005046956,0.0000013398361,4.120257e-8,0.000003876117,0.0033917897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070346,0.0005230125,0.0008816764,0.00016651358,0.007509262,0.00021608148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98260283,0.013549078,0.0012024423,0.0005875379,0.0019499691,0.00010810917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.069630854,0.00008847779,0.00040036312,0.0010851907,0.00044743752,0.0012164763,0.0111024575,0.00005009495,0.00023520127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028666861,0.000024024966,0.00031054553,0.026898302,0.0019020978,0.0005393428,0.0032899717,0.00046296683,0.0000029463822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010325868,0.00003863509,0.039128635,0.000006309138,0.000045326567,0.0000012664044,0.00046519114,0.00039922138,0.00006535175,0.0006220909,0.940567,0.018557694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052685686,0.00039017687,0.7925662,0.00037663485,0.000118375436,0.00005767546,0.0029996498,0.01746962,0.00033994243,0.068432115,0.11187164,0.00010940011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011582067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014193516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82869536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053388143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020322288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304145111","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04537-w","title":"Global impact or national accessibility? A paradox in China’s science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Visibility; International community; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Regional science; Sociology; Library science; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6015316297703749,"score_gpt":0.6593529174440662,"score_spread":0.057821287673691324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304145111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96778005,0.00044576125,0.0010270849,0.00066661445,0.001792452,0.00051073014,0.00043883096,0.00004926662,0.027289221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970747,0.000023477674,0.0008977509,0.00021751187,0.00005873026,0.000051441988,0.0000068211075,0.000010046874,0.0016594699],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9300591,0.00053140003,0.0013379471,0.002253839,0.06387719,0.001940533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861471,0.003779169,0.0006108497,0.0016521871,0.006363311,0.001447374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1443928,0.00027698264,0.00048168324,0.2889733,0.0016993027,0.006375298,0.011700628,0.00007597594,0.005159388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21277158,0.0001858966,0.00026077838,0.8949101,0.0010199914,0.0026190467,0.0064890864,0.0005828656,0.00021566334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011616002,0.00075682654,0.9146708,0.0000028617314,0.000005475771,0.000053153504,0.0002005591,0.005458027,0.0001011227,0.002572758,0.010197487,0.06586476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007811029,0.00037356195,0.9523097,0.0000018791225,0.0000016442417,0.00005336546,0.00032951173,0.024553644,0.000037926624,0.015159846,0.0061259572,0.00027185364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005062098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008292424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6059368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006556989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008900182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304890705","doi":"10.1002/smj.3460","title":"Going beyond optimal distinctiveness: Strategic positioning for gaining an audience composition premium","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Composition (language); Position (finance); Business; Marketing; Earnings; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.5048594730900926,"score_gpt":0.5291731972689193,"score_spread":0.024313724178826712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304890705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79778033,0.00038539807,0.054944776,0.00041361377,0.0012587248,0.00070630055,0.00009202094,0.00005062536,0.1443682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887328,0.00006454655,0.010051125,0.00008917066,0.00021701351,0.00008273592,0.000047160163,0.000017676664,0.0006977798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907708,0.0005868721,0.00087427284,0.00080238323,0.006114278,0.0008513843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964692,0.00084553554,0.0006210227,0.00043666275,0.0012018922,0.00042569544],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021418538,0.00022197318,0.00029440384,0.015276857,0.0034259807,0.006214542,0.002253983,0.00004326967,0.0009810594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018402841,0.00018936144,0.00020613536,0.033207666,0.000111202055,0.0010633789,0.0007496168,0.0005977129,0.000021102025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007596577,0.001238856,0.0072232434,0.00010084124,0.00026612953,0.00094836956,0.0010166883,0.08782874,0.0045353794,0.86652446,0.0008284421,0.028729172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001516632,0.0016632926,0.0025506627,0.00003953572,0.00004609295,0.00035007187,0.02754276,0.25262442,0.00009245145,0.71273416,0.00040069318,0.00043922054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050345493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016439251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19095245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004132967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017503007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306253448","doi":"10.1002/pra2.641","title":"Investigating Open Access Publishing Practices of Early and <scp>Mid‐Career</scp> Researchers in Humanities and Social Sciences Disciplines","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Audience measurement; Descriptive statistics; Library science; Scholarly communication; Open peer review; Citation; Psychology; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Plant biology; Business","score_opus":0.6736601966620449,"score_gpt":0.5621824102859028,"score_spread":0.11147778637614214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306253448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845085,0.00007561501,0.000002727295,0.009097034,0.000066672284,0.00044471625,0.00003055118,0.000009425561,0.005764748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.0000367114,0.00033726703,0.000110421315,0.000007272898,0.000058592163,6.6283513e-7,0.0000019617266,0.00013485369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939381,0.000031832595,0.00061811,0.0002904762,0.004754495,0.0003670017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986647,0.0028685096,0.0033156613,0.00010272363,0.007018161,0.000047958518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055342477,0.000069432586,0.00020345261,0.019848257,0.0020194498,0.012004744,0.0047194175,0.000078439094,0.0000014675404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20841368,0.000049711474,0.000018826531,0.078638405,0.001560307,0.026061628,0.009099861,0.0002905632,1.5427531e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030556946,0.0000134565325,0.91181886,0.000027194677,0.000003977937,8.112961e-9,0.0041540554,0.0000031996226,0.0016777928,0.06952808,0.0010350879,0.011735207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083286065,0.00033362902,0.7160398,0.000022925211,0.000007982082,0.000003475047,0.09521636,0.00335206,0.006828561,0.16305554,0.014211025,0.0000957852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021603183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022163647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1957791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015647139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042697717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992798},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4306906643","doi":"10.21900/j.alise.2022.996","title":"Assessing Open Access Scholarly Communication Practices of Early and Mid-Career Researchers in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Equity (law); Gender equity; Scientific communication; Public relations; Access to information; Scientific publishing; Time lag; Open access publishing; Open science; Knowledge management; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Business; Computer science; Social science; Information access; Lag","score_opus":0.8272101727848972,"score_gpt":0.6164463562800755,"score_spread":0.21076381650482168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306906643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98803735,0.00044158928,0.0000018461886,0.0045462525,0.000053970118,0.00033885817,0.000053249547,0.0000019234467,0.0065249577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927086,0.00011370741,0.0002118575,0.0000865006,0.000003932536,0.000026945698,7.704271e-7,0.0000053139947,0.00028011593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925239,0.00025330606,0.00058056816,0.00040478093,0.0059266593,0.00031078348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855836,0.0028701955,0.0016836238,0.0005278851,0.009140332,0.00019436984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023058627,0.00008615151,0.00025852508,0.005507152,0.0003723332,0.010618708,0.0133104,0.000031277796,0.00014316189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04662433,0.000060706443,0.000030253435,0.04668071,0.00021657944,0.013500878,0.015695428,0.0006170433,4.441427e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007530724,0.000059181515,0.9761027,0.000017725835,0.000011150661,7.7527073e-7,0.0019039805,0.000009678811,0.0029856672,0.0014642993,0.0024738444,0.014895678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035031792,0.000086486354,0.95008147,0.000043151507,0.000005641466,0.0000028715128,0.034723934,0.00067404844,0.0034719957,0.0072864085,0.0031646874,0.00010898649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.751035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087936014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66309893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002454279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026053572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99226546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306993085","doi":"10.1002/asi.24717","title":"Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011–2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Listing (finance); Subject (documents); Library science; Computer science; Business; Political science; Advertising; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.4447264701377277,"score_gpt":0.5309513708115245,"score_spread":0.08622490067379684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306993085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87965703,0.00042894133,0.000215595,0.116306216,0.0010438157,0.0002840856,0.000025976042,0.000004146339,0.002034172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988266,0.00033248414,0.00017891305,0.00044951367,0.000036333084,0.00001092175,3.4272693e-7,0.0000015434307,0.00016329686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474794,0.00009164623,0.0006944139,0.00013174988,0.004048603,0.00028562866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288905,0.0007300757,0.0017283624,0.00012214486,0.004422631,0.000107764135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06308899,0.0000562143,0.00018721422,0.046080306,0.0012368392,0.0149961375,0.0037195375,0.00006397265,0.000033854663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04587506,0.00003536348,0.00003036137,0.06648682,0.00015074613,0.028550288,0.0038006015,0.0005012031,7.1488336e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001458478,0.000017901622,0.60375196,0.0000020962354,0.000006236727,6.3427177e-7,0.00087070063,0.000005446554,0.000055370358,0.008672563,0.0067260056,0.3798765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019368958,0.00027632405,0.82105905,0.000013251713,0.000008748425,0.00027720656,0.0061250604,0.0047607687,0.00025996385,0.064852804,0.100294344,0.00013555308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031725463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007671947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37974095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042460315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031985444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307133281","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/yjp3k","title":"Typos, Misspellings and Other Accidents: Metadata Accuracy as a Measure of Publisher Quality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Legitimacy; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Normative; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8077962310092358,"score_gpt":0.6496314343089904,"score_spread":0.1581647967002454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307133281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64920753,0.016254164,0.01100315,0.006730504,0.004074604,0.0022357004,0.001061674,0.00012789878,0.30930477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86729413,0.0014043875,0.0065492056,0.0017035851,0.00020661944,0.00007081744,0.000071289716,0.000083626874,0.12261631],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97321975,0.0012386116,0.0019774162,0.0020417909,0.020876558,0.0006458534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734739,0.013077195,0.0018977266,0.0043816115,0.0063594463,0.00081011624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070587166,0.00035733418,0.0010243136,0.04518129,0.00020073373,0.010625513,0.008126826,0.0003633709,0.027062358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1686881,0.0002454167,0.0003857775,0.089189395,0.00024749964,0.0017046062,0.013967263,0.001263852,0.00015933381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027300417,0.00095061393,0.38457763,0.00017873693,0.0005899382,0.000029763209,0.0009676166,0.00009576234,0.0006149878,0.021520706,0.42260253,0.16759871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087775127,0.00015230283,0.05623937,0.000035436493,0.00006269769,0.000011246979,0.0029423814,0.00054915866,0.00062000175,0.13630791,0.8013759,0.00082582684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007287961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001260326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3787734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000125855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082794396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307170568","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.011","title":"Recommendations for making editorial boards diverse and inclusive","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Equity (law); Key (lock); Political science; Ecology; Public relations; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.4006596374313827,"score_gpt":0.5721685505213855,"score_spread":0.17150891309000277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307170568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795631,0.00032818745,0.0042778878,0.021853108,0.08876267,0.0006061805,0.00059278077,0.00005645114,0.003959632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627453,0.000012507522,0.0009758642,0.00007563225,0.0015512619,0.00012903467,0.000028742023,0.0000051322163,0.0009473057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965832,0.00035393765,0.000401592,0.0004898761,0.0017786096,0.00039275186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632126,0.002657105,0.00018041981,0.00022954615,0.0005332857,0.00007840628],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011098445,0.00007867285,0.00018274304,0.0349512,0.0009055156,0.00017065773,0.00065347814,0.000092088616,0.00080624624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007701488,0.00007339586,0.00006454244,0.048275772,0.00010748693,0.0002957228,0.0014323042,0.00028182083,0.0000130911285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010868542,0.00018203104,0.31442025,0.0000010976453,0.000009682626,0.000002564358,0.0002990442,0.0004144199,0.00004920101,0.004625408,0.5354272,0.1444604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016841297,0.0006253075,0.53929335,0.0000013389952,0.000009579956,0.000007802684,0.0028144615,0.017830623,0.0000047812146,0.046576876,0.39099154,0.00016020195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007490905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004263599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22487311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008262895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013213493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308502319","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11309","title":"Research performance of the GCC countries: A comparative analysis of quantity and quality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University; United Arab Emirates University","keywords":"Gross domestic product; Scopus; Productivity; Citation impact; Population; Bibliometrics; Citation; Human capital; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Business; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Demography; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8123891935899495,"score_gpt":0.6612881790043565,"score_spread":0.151101014585593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308502319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99530584,0.0020035827,0.000052015777,0.00019733199,0.000092686394,0.00016120539,0.00018642188,0.0000024739275,0.0019984713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864703,0.00062968873,0.00003715392,0.000025548656,0.0000056268277,0.000009540772,0.0000013729406,0.0000015775314,0.0006424446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855802,0.0015437816,0.00066155964,0.00036852388,0.01156208,0.000283826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889908,0.0066392347,0.0003327388,0.000770209,0.003177642,0.00008939473],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052526865,0.000060319722,0.00040746364,0.029577747,0.00058276637,0.00019579411,0.0016427408,0.000029843195,0.0007848429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006197403,0.000036012476,0.00013455808,0.26966813,0.0006193876,0.00016856559,0.0016918713,0.00033522886,0.000008951968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078625766,0.000095611205,0.99267757,0.000032695087,0.00006616733,2.0999192e-7,0.0009920803,0.00073310215,0.00080894376,0.0034564855,0.00041483526,0.00064369425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014709162,0.00019453408,0.98214954,0.0000060671714,0.00001601652,3.2528732e-7,0.0032496192,0.0064576822,0.0024106582,0.000102050995,0.005219317,0.000047077174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052200526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025314008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24009039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007730465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020707966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308568388","doi":"10.17159/2411-9717/1741/2022","title":"Journal impact factors - The good, the bad, and the ugly","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Scopus; Publication; Excellence; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Declaration; Citation impact; Editorial board; Public relations; Library science; Citation; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2569656732474563,"score_gpt":0.4493466976053737,"score_spread":0.19238102435791743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308568388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857282,0.0038561567,0.0002484197,0.0070696203,0.0013195844,0.00014270483,0.00003109904,0.0000020488894,0.0016021872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749464,0.00025651927,0.00009102718,0.00014765181,0.00016587948,0.0000020325367,1.07827475e-7,0.0000096062395,0.0018325597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175036,0.0013293232,0.0009584968,0.00019230059,0.0054094973,0.00036004413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99143195,0.004974956,0.0018990124,0.00059775263,0.0008582479,0.00023809115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039572798,0.00017052877,0.00047441066,0.00365907,0.0021303017,0.0012486726,0.0038070576,0.000038059137,0.00023205417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013665725,0.000048566424,0.0006061599,0.017392565,0.0014857384,0.00028748196,0.0012437108,0.0008993443,0.0000020027082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034575046,0.0008372958,0.21762672,0.000023696264,0.004771507,0.00017186953,0.225014,0.020919498,0.0024677743,0.011014779,0.04171083,0.4719845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057168915,0.0014923874,0.104088545,0.000059197715,0.00059071765,0.0042522866,0.35035998,0.0045350106,0.000115888746,0.013469269,0.514846,0.00047381842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020652292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028681332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47313517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075834054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005099787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308881984","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009849","title":"Cancer research across Africa: a comparative bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Wellcome Trust; World Health Organization","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Stakeholder; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.866768386049011,"score_gpt":0.7615708795367876,"score_spread":0.10519750651222337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308881984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9381091,0.021911513,0.0020638711,0.0103770355,0.0011822239,0.0015758262,0.003933042,0.00007618531,0.020771226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943628,0.0005379349,0.00037599856,0.00044682116,0.00012175895,0.00035591985,0.000018108036,0.000008241497,0.0037724753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554622,0.0039799707,0.0015002422,0.0016212579,0.03478034,0.002655967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424786,0.0058789947,0.00061858655,0.0015552891,0.0062238183,0.0014754728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12555552,0.00021736376,0.00096495514,0.7029402,0.0035300963,0.0026223692,0.0049226843,0.0000774105,0.00343236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011752549,0.00016965094,0.00041438796,0.9907867,0.0003625852,0.00041880738,0.004474269,0.00093354785,0.00051973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012499634,0.0005126395,0.28271872,0.0000072471335,0.00020157776,0.00003553641,0.0011758653,0.003563007,0.0000051332086,0.002217368,0.51140034,0.19803756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018244,0.00059713784,0.6790741,0.000002760173,0.000012128627,0.000010450565,0.00659034,0.010478318,0.0000059871163,0.004498276,0.2980092,0.00021947757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008431881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013744938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3963554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036860367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029095067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308896630","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11481","title":"Academic dependency: the influence of the prevailing international biomedical research agenda on Argentina’s CONICET","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dependency (UML); Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; Public administration; Regional science; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.6412639197273935,"score_gpt":0.6094413638415208,"score_spread":0.03182255588587268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308896630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850016,0.0012676158,0.00003590613,0.008922877,0.0011043719,0.000332219,0.00007922325,0.000009009651,0.0032471516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482334,0.00076302286,0.00002662404,0.0004549537,0.000098244716,0.000044497963,0.0000023607374,0.0000073919673,0.0037795696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97488993,0.001396582,0.00070751656,0.0005589622,0.021902664,0.00054434943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99027467,0.0066003446,0.00027745526,0.0009833743,0.0017157035,0.00014845762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051009975,0.000090989946,0.00015159963,0.014080633,0.0009818455,0.00038431853,0.007879775,0.00007957682,0.0020908082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049408387,0.00004576134,0.0001416895,0.0867986,0.0005279318,0.00018726173,0.004262266,0.0018092805,0.00023291574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058427866,0.0015432294,0.48813006,0.00011886764,0.0001679255,0.00008923811,0.00535957,0.0143399965,0.103757635,0.03788446,0.14972721,0.19829752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005686734,0.00035328418,0.3841753,0.0000681628,0.000005262218,0.000030581923,0.0020054858,0.0030491415,0.0043668137,0.009461424,0.59575456,0.00016131507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004962178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000706651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44602734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020684575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005527342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309567987","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.09.010","title":"Le parcours du JOGC vers l’obtention d’un facteur d’impact","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0916914361960037,"score_gpt":0.39702818835814946,"score_spread":0.30533675216214573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309567987","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15901525,0.02540855,0.00014703722,0.0017938245,0.810328,0.00027220882,0.00082101073,0.0000045682527,0.002209523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96228147,0.012255337,0.0002670894,0.00018843419,0.021882357,0.000008318483,0.000066901295,0.00006907415,0.0029810318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766511,0.0015461225,0.0026995565,0.0009834658,0.01656521,0.0015545995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88475525,0.096606754,0.004460889,0.00081094046,0.011002484,0.002363697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020047717,0.0006198178,0.0017448848,0.045438465,0.0015501338,0.0019475619,0.0039976174,0.0009957529,0.011452044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31577477,0.0005124709,0.00076341757,0.07891932,0.00047153822,0.0008861081,0.0014096141,0.0038314578,0.000013313436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002397966,0.0003455159,0.06829068,0.000029392559,0.00041300405,0.0052663735,0.000078836405,0.0006994765,0.0000048642783,0.00026339878,0.6406009,0.28398353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028539777,0.0017005001,0.14329419,0.000006461438,0.00013872032,0.000114383685,0.0012201823,0.00054269587,0.0000064667606,0.00068287307,0.8489842,0.00045536755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1577265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031931452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8032662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008953987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051740896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309568207","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2022.09.009","title":"The JOGC’s Journey to an Impact Factor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Popularity; Citation; Science Citation Index; Analytics; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Library science; Index (typography); Computer science; Law; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.29070196121347364,"score_gpt":0.5044263482859506,"score_spread":0.21372438707247693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309568207","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031923797,0.010764934,0.00003582524,0.0007298301,0.9550244,0.00021286988,0.000781712,0.0000029111563,0.0005237175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60287535,0.011365272,0.0006197935,0.0010679566,0.36746252,0.000036114932,0.000065668086,0.00023696391,0.01627036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751749,0.0009432753,0.002022262,0.00066059607,0.020118171,0.0010807774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79400104,0.18560316,0.0029044014,0.0011756014,0.013595178,0.002720633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021794222,0.00037472442,0.0010696038,0.031879824,0.0012907503,0.0035988218,0.0061491174,0.0005218055,0.0029347052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49304304,0.00020455878,0.0003350418,0.06536877,0.00014296723,0.0004147117,0.0013209926,0.0031279698,0.0000062752533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008645989,0.000040202638,0.0052018403,0.000002298876,0.00007802454,0.0006891752,0.000044918947,0.00007662236,8.541386e-7,0.000009431532,0.78178495,0.21206304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000563922,0.001559725,0.05529131,0.0000013065992,0.000022683476,0.000018305947,0.00047257842,0.00007858675,0.0000012077248,0.00040561584,0.9413505,0.0002342278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030067563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061289024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5875619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054738126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023256553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309914084","doi":"10.33211/jnhpr.27","title":"Favouring Responsible Publishing: Creating a Database of Researchers and Surveying Their Knowledge, Attitudes and Opinions towards Open Access Publishing and a New Field-Specific Journal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Natural Health Product Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine; University of Toronto; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Snowball sampling; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.9019385006049092,"score_gpt":0.701033187179452,"score_spread":0.20090531342545725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309914084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7507227,0.13463648,0.00015515309,0.1113263,0.00097495335,0.0009800977,0.000076409466,0.000007788561,0.0011201273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805873,0.013344547,0.0040730606,0.00013646968,0.00063207315,0.000007962514,0.0000059444114,0.000023103401,0.0011895273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97140217,0.009535429,0.0023810316,0.0011530987,0.013812266,0.001716029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91650593,0.051172294,0.0029003976,0.0017118163,0.023429938,0.0042796144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31918082,0.00020795353,0.00080160866,0.04289075,0.0033826001,0.046312686,0.007763042,0.000069054586,0.00017631824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24588309,0.0001417799,0.00009901846,0.06685247,0.00038719524,0.018105213,0.01958655,0.0068304474,5.562171e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011151636,0.00024928834,0.085894614,0.00023474442,0.000063961015,0.00006363574,0.0043612546,0.000015455693,0.00081672054,0.0007881598,0.1936408,0.7127562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056084907,0.003837934,0.75762856,0.0012744701,0.000008627457,0.0029266342,0.027472133,0.0015579782,0.0015231486,0.017748157,0.1798006,0.0006132807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004329591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038866076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71214294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060305314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009422573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310004589","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7368122","title":"[STREAM.FREE]** XVII MENS SOFTBALL WORLD CUP 2022 LIVE FREE WBSC Zealand","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free access; Free water; Free world; Free press; Engineering; Computer science; Business; Sociology; World Wide Web; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.2770753363298951,"score_gpt":0.4131874111478171,"score_spread":0.13611207481792198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310004589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16917849,0.0017179744,0.00409353,0.019577678,0.0021926605,0.002667844,0.007506789,0.0019554817,0.79110956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86933225,0.00037449505,0.0009976606,0.0009851424,0.0005224948,9.317235e-7,0.0014413948,0.0019298879,0.124415725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98618436,0.0014520452,0.00075318094,0.0012646659,0.00927382,0.0010719268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992352,0.0008654749,0.00035035762,0.0025066978,0.0031733052,0.0007521546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016276166,0.0002486856,0.00034848813,0.024345547,0.006510078,0.0061452226,0.012138411,0.00006610999,0.17259005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029719459,0.00022693649,0.0001836144,0.08312201,0.0003325109,0.00065584824,0.021481726,0.00095815,0.014583758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007895758,0.00028462513,0.0002545089,0.0000063641214,0.00003327808,0.000056366287,0.00073277013,0.000121779245,0.00076892157,0.0024653669,0.90768605,0.087511025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010210184,0.00049041375,0.0031050302,0.000004531442,0.0000092376,0.00008882063,0.0013197026,0.0012405099,0.0001382975,0.005520962,0.9867866,0.00027485404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013431844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007751356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70015377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005478557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003254591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310005349","doi":"10.9460/foo.bar","title":"Watch Canada vs Croatia LIVE STREAM FREE Full Match FIFA World Cup 27 November 2022 At Home","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.17284132406916553,"score_gpt":0.36785867747209944,"score_spread":0.1950173534029339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310005349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75641096,0.00074523076,0.0008544648,0.018141005,0.0023176388,0.0015970528,0.0074914293,0.0006375505,0.2118047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8429345,0.00011907508,0.00021606099,0.0006995673,0.00020545938,4.5034412e-7,0.0010411019,0.0009903237,0.1537935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98538,0.0010921992,0.00077395333,0.0012482415,0.010386526,0.0011190798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929299,0.0008129754,0.00034353783,0.0018992767,0.003237413,0.00077690656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009713311,0.0002644239,0.00036919516,0.010680753,0.0060097235,0.0040364116,0.008432377,0.000059861846,0.3214244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107592065,0.00024313826,0.00013666734,0.073471606,0.00023217608,0.00052518654,0.019028595,0.00083447556,0.011205404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014483297,0.00017869285,0.0006815654,0.00001212309,0.000031752745,0.000085092135,0.00037697694,0.00025481303,0.0008245429,0.00061741204,0.9703386,0.026453588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071734877,0.00033881114,0.0065896837,0.000004624461,0.0000067877136,0.00010094265,0.00085830345,0.0013334056,0.0002222266,0.0007554079,0.9887614,0.00031105426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024200393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006862322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.310219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00183149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009860042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310711299","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592","title":"Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Injustice; Public relations; Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9161172157063313,"score_gpt":0.7347011405825472,"score_spread":0.1814160751237841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310711299","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014786672,0.765234,0.00027047933,0.004684433,0.004319625,0.0014832449,0.00009870348,0.00005204697,0.22384271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00030043843,0.99146664,0.000020909281,0.0005354359,0.00097580487,0.00018873689,0.00009048885,0.000030516969,0.006391052],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95709443,0.0015442807,0.0025329345,0.002840582,0.034325726,0.0016620479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813298,0.007145005,0.002478476,0.0019987575,0.0057277773,0.0013201666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20266704,0.0004622125,0.0026351884,0.06946336,0.0041146707,0.051985614,0.0691504,0.00031262857,0.014165022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26209548,0.00028250384,0.0005152422,0.52733785,0.0034388478,0.013654308,0.028830115,0.0017841636,0.00015383234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028082238,0.000050032864,0.00012400758,0.00013218835,0.000011180263,0.000012084692,0.00032707758,7.938069e-8,4.5829944e-7,0.003083815,0.16559488,0.8306614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002661648,0.0000785538,0.00028925706,0.00036602022,0.0000617942,0.000010964736,0.0007246977,0.00001852589,3.0845865e-7,0.010965965,0.9868976,0.00032014365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046334593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010285117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018921058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059934915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311046123","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04565-6","title":"Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Bibliometrics; Library science; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Computer science; Geography; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.7729591827362152,"score_gpt":0.6206454994995081,"score_spread":0.15231368323670713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311046123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98859817,0.0014403409,0.0007649863,0.0004990958,0.0038719669,0.00041493453,0.00016691037,0.000033950568,0.004209634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975622,0.00019991281,0.0002498348,0.00013407263,0.000082184,0.000044307388,0.000012112484,0.000012527898,0.0017027968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9628152,0.0007973398,0.0015642622,0.0014876176,0.032456428,0.00087914756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97594756,0.01508291,0.0012771401,0.0017986144,0.005421689,0.0004720582],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09781933,0.00019763832,0.00040519002,0.21557449,0.00068646536,0.0067095743,0.005449575,0.00020236606,0.0011561909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27711844,0.00016431129,0.00013692804,0.6009262,0.00039972298,0.004809255,0.0015294885,0.0013916155,0.0000779208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008790491,0.00045448792,0.9269142,0.00002293511,0.0000046827026,0.0000074609156,0.00032113513,0.0016653131,0.0012292454,0.0013475316,0.00771228,0.060232814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038789544,0.0003916381,0.9791538,0.000032638396,0.0000036056194,0.0000030835872,0.0012208901,0.008783312,0.0012112206,0.0018374604,0.00676536,0.00020910651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031571757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034142344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38535172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010373471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064940355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999314},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4311187241","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7425342","title":"Classifying the Directory of Open Access Journals Using the Canadian Research and Development Classification System: Analysis and recommendations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Library science; Data science; Operating system","score_opus":0.8951663670708331,"score_gpt":0.6251363025289446,"score_spread":0.2700300645418885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311187241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07451755,0.01354008,0.009435355,0.023967292,0.0021380738,0.009454027,0.0041766074,0.00030951714,0.8624615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072176,0.004022149,0.00039596055,0.00005201442,0.00014977656,0.0000013356423,0.00077922543,0.0005145344,0.0033632647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845283,0.0035320448,0.0011218374,0.00094968575,0.0092129065,0.0006552278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98111707,0.0019525705,0.00091912836,0.0013251136,0.01414723,0.0005389028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10109173,0.0001875624,0.0004605182,0.040471498,0.01765354,0.03782906,0.010840686,0.000139527,0.009768687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026854213,0.000121026926,0.00008284504,0.09587849,0.00069606304,0.0009212188,0.016641626,0.0013101418,0.000085525986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003694468,0.00013133862,0.0047627613,0.00014325914,0.0008125784,0.000013928567,0.0022203142,0.00010595373,0.00029670977,0.0021642705,0.4338294,0.55548257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010800135,0.000038821472,0.048940476,0.00004521345,0.00005805254,0.00006793638,0.0050139506,0.0015700756,0.000024831546,0.00012568515,0.94386584,0.00014114824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03054544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031232445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002428249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000738933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311216358","doi":"10.1101/2022.12.12.22283368","title":"The Geographical Gap in Leading Medical Journals - a Computational Audit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Bibliometrics; Nationality; Library science; Geography; Publishing; Audit; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Demography; Medicine; Sociology; Accounting; Business; Immigration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6024181963448855,"score_gpt":0.5997689342902583,"score_spread":0.0026492620546271217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311216358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530967,0.0055560735,0.0038198847,0.026277818,0.0031447953,0.00028795307,0.00004343431,0.000026900223,0.0077464394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966769,0.0015046613,0.0003158392,0.00032796586,0.0002342361,0.000066644425,0.000009078746,0.000015512702,0.0008491438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623592,0.0014950053,0.0015405217,0.001045621,0.032740347,0.00081931223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698962,0.026285656,0.0006068642,0.0010417871,0.0014550876,0.0007144312],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10985543,0.00019163916,0.00043748925,0.04989339,0.0007516286,0.0041243383,0.007383071,0.00031012326,0.010127014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12276031,0.000118410804,0.00037802852,0.11817875,0.00044078412,0.00013705857,0.007192233,0.0033322913,0.00022685326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002471338,0.00014558925,0.88681614,0.000007833942,0.0000384202,0.00026544437,0.00012559853,0.007356345,0.0000043082146,0.0049673608,0.027964838,0.07228338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003425746,0.00005417956,0.6175091,0.000045000193,0.0000044605945,0.00003846484,0.0002243104,0.087512456,0.0000036073077,0.21003114,0.08399596,0.00023874163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008561923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011317779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26930705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014817883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012164208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311696862","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04601-5","title":"Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Concordia University","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Key (lock); Set (abstract data type); Social network analysis; Computer science; Knowledge management; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Social media; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.48391299523641157,"score_gpt":0.5021268655735966,"score_spread":0.01821387033718508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311696862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97938555,0.0018397933,0.013095802,0.0011150598,0.0023724546,0.0010446557,0.00021344294,0.00002588451,0.0009073597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984841,0.00011122205,0.0007736357,0.00015044484,0.00007637425,0.00017817356,0.000026678059,0.000013157159,0.00018622835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97856736,0.0016033637,0.0015151615,0.0018008965,0.01457199,0.0019412442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926561,0.0036395784,0.00045228653,0.0010712587,0.0018354107,0.0003453441],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07692394,0.00024699527,0.00040856548,0.11827082,0.0024363468,0.011614599,0.0035691017,0.000095240175,0.00033027705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018034926,0.00018549395,0.000102293045,0.67391855,0.00058062305,0.0018834096,0.0015783552,0.00073306484,0.00003684617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013544314,0.0025156573,0.62508416,0.00005329959,0.000032139385,0.00022951963,0.07579497,0.12303875,0.00097079837,0.09302519,0.008583428,0.07053662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069603784,0.0005560647,0.3459907,0.000025311949,0.000013403166,0.0000829178,0.09002556,0.47855607,0.00023332378,0.05700652,0.025885332,0.00092879485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008312241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004091224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55564773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014887754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073818193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311809706","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04599-w","title":"Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Multivariate analysis; Significant difference; Health science; Statistics; Actuarial science; Library science; Medicine; Medical education; Political science; Economics; Computer science; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5549541081458416,"score_gpt":0.5712223387063445,"score_spread":0.016268230560502972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311809706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847992,0.0029119267,0.0023108649,0.0025942747,0.004160847,0.0018948745,0.00025904676,0.00012399448,0.0009449645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99260366,0.00006214924,0.0026270084,0.00039850236,0.00005112787,0.00043619744,0.00007115578,0.000029669818,0.003720514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9426335,0.0029895275,0.00266303,0.0027363512,0.04690688,0.0020706882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779707,0.010319959,0.0018716918,0.0030895416,0.0054915403,0.0012565252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19466531,0.00037483676,0.0008532909,0.9414215,0.004405165,0.009076762,0.008245592,0.00012733281,0.0014159869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0628017,0.00025056483,0.0005580157,0.9951064,0.00050542323,0.0012648377,0.003659904,0.0013522289,0.0002804402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036471698,0.0019473281,0.9294596,0.000015420428,0.00010125872,0.000032768137,0.0035091075,0.0026101484,0.00018938976,0.001902874,0.0124226175,0.04777307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079234224,0.00041612546,0.9358577,0.0000033481517,0.000073552634,0.00000996617,0.004490503,0.04143238,0.00005926352,0.0018011688,0.014677948,0.00038568073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040185012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003534444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13186361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020795134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023714209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311844276","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00228","title":"Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford Graduate School of Education","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Diversity (politics); Indonesian; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Political science; Discipline; Social science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7607194694388768,"score_gpt":0.6363862618839845,"score_spread":0.1243332075548923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311844276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97865087,0.005803256,0.003372931,0.004975385,0.000515281,0.000561462,0.000034593955,0.000016084583,0.006070119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965323,0.00016251525,0.0028919056,0.000145514,0.000011275634,0.00008947614,7.5965823e-7,0.000005943777,0.00016030122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361725,0.00080460886,0.0008766399,0.00086027593,0.013239922,0.0006012962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751423,0.009963432,0.000767957,0.0006538402,0.0133187305,0.00015371588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07835025,0.00012489388,0.00033077697,0.028422564,0.0021885603,0.0076592313,0.0048007765,0.000024997207,0.00006988616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29753768,0.00007429033,0.00006024881,0.3347103,0.0018913912,0.0135760745,0.0027336667,0.00054760964,0.000009492345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470022,0.0006793194,0.6409175,0.000049011072,0.00005852895,0.000021153066,0.050400466,0.027609766,0.0066055777,0.16907443,0.0059944964,0.09844278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010698343,0.0016105614,0.3357742,0.00007530603,0.000010400182,0.000008732508,0.3727418,0.1811344,0.0034030955,0.10210919,0.0015854995,0.00047698917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012408875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013580729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32234132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027421888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010909635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312081906","doi":"10.1108/mf-07-2022-0330","title":"Mapping the intellectual structure and demystifying the research trend of cross listing: a bibliometric analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial Finance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Originality; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Publication; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Social science; Citation; Qualitative research; Business; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.643601084985468,"score_gpt":0.5594661742887042,"score_spread":0.08413491069676382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312081906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908596,0.004363499,0.0015312816,0.0009825161,0.00044930162,0.00031503817,0.000116827076,0.000010264589,0.0013716421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719083,0.00035385002,0.00018623003,0.00004916212,0.00010912993,0.000029643146,0.0000038709354,0.000009378944,0.002067874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874342,0.001344046,0.0007662438,0.0008017862,0.008958422,0.00069527084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97349954,0.023462987,0.0003916944,0.0012301297,0.0013193926,0.00009627197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045791563,0.00014174702,0.00038529624,0.45791245,0.0027101585,0.003224901,0.004321679,0.000057288267,0.0008322586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06613276,0.000075888725,0.00019042891,0.9332033,0.0009287017,0.000262224,0.004567885,0.0008147171,0.0000084887715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029008725,0.00012091045,0.13593361,0.00003113325,0.00031650445,0.000043449083,0.0068775658,0.012385084,0.001422461,0.005326684,0.0264329,0.8108196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044674712,0.00019158037,0.75362366,0.000005003241,0.000032936576,0.00001377112,0.004284983,0.03741937,0.000305433,0.00864981,0.19481571,0.00021100327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003992726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065679065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8106086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009071187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101427606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312814818","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv33t5ggk.68","title":"Intriguing New Model for Improved Visibility and Access to Theses and Dissertations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Purdue University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Computer science; Geography; Regional science; Meteorology","score_opus":0.6285107005024337,"score_gpt":0.5054689668631106,"score_spread":0.12304173363932314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312814818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004224008,0.00055651314,0.22128145,0.0029943641,0.0002824985,0.0039741388,0.0013841324,0.000118495096,0.7651844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038393427,0.00018028206,0.0051335804,0.00023330004,0.00008116969,0.0000030133326,0.000012519333,0.000031346186,0.95593137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696314,0.000032704316,0.0003175133,0.0010764801,0.0012953345,0.0003148103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949902,0.0022145566,0.00020705014,0.00052662985,0.001175382,0.000886127],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014993711,0.00023783967,0.00043393907,0.009342283,0.00036007707,0.002139437,0.0017064941,0.00021074817,0.000016960019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044274586,0.00020765366,0.0001256316,0.0014116867,0.00015002007,0.00044419375,0.0021030474,0.0002713404,0.0000029154114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006907873,0.00003465767,0.0003083921,0.00011279227,0.00016146783,0.000019844552,0.002428138,0.00016428951,0.0003922537,0.47110066,0.019704206,0.5048825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012459677,0.00028127767,0.00084967696,0.00006778042,0.00013945183,0.0000029404846,0.000286736,0.1961461,0.00027066248,0.10942747,0.6904659,0.00081599003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002532023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012926213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67076176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008040168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027381346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313208965","doi":"10.4103/0973-3698.364675","title":"Disseminating Biomedical Research: Predatory Journals and Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Rheumatology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dissemination; Engineering","score_opus":0.6830509861330616,"score_gpt":0.6488471419017912,"score_spread":0.03420384423127043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313208965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833119,0.007029027,0.00014075382,0.007916777,0.0009472963,0.00008728595,0.000019135565,0.0000039060565,0.00054395513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980003,0.0009494791,0.00074206723,0.000052357635,0.000046559024,0.000004319109,5.642319e-7,0.000009548221,0.00019477459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981538,0.0032074107,0.0015722213,0.0003794171,0.012593251,0.0007097161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654472,0.025972348,0.0032099613,0.00042474899,0.003988719,0.0009570552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12487538,0.000101748556,0.0004821823,0.067568064,0.0010347668,0.0012925814,0.0027757373,0.00010626692,0.002487135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20049366,0.00007244194,0.000115665694,0.061971772,0.0006393072,0.00084342744,0.0015036359,0.002121441,0.000032023694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119018536,0.0003369398,0.7015039,0.000019291914,0.00007604732,0.0018359275,0.0036791025,0.000015968422,0.00066429545,0.0009404521,0.09676135,0.19404773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026481857,0.004397966,0.12911253,0.00014236593,0.00001872927,0.10573468,0.098282784,0.0012601323,0.00029738262,0.05457896,0.6030451,0.00048118908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000344341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046612304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57239133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013682978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008589899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997442},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4313400493","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04627-9","title":"An artificial intelligence-based framework for data-driven categorization of computer scientists: a case study of world’s Top 10 computing departments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Cluster analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Categorization; Rand index; Data mining; Index (typography); Artificial neural network; Machine learning; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6906770264083343,"score_gpt":0.6059824450165449,"score_spread":0.08469458139178943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313400493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5279557,0.00004851952,0.4693736,0.00003158338,0.0013503247,0.0008449333,0.00034860446,0.0000185628,0.000028158422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93569124,0.0000013311768,0.06394059,0.000039287566,0.00010002341,0.000026294007,0.000117975076,0.000018889867,0.000064373744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97984564,0.00074494473,0.0019464039,0.0017304464,0.01491634,0.0008161958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981778,0.008041147,0.0013350894,0.0025694706,0.0057766484,0.0004995993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04189893,0.00023251964,0.00061195344,0.15208605,0.0011941541,0.0016282244,0.006528906,0.000072215014,0.00050893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020868858,0.00020341035,0.00014776221,0.5139614,0.00033669392,0.0007391094,0.0030368762,0.00033075255,0.000012115927],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021351819,0.012161433,0.19205838,0.000055699304,0.00008048384,0.00023123216,0.0034107855,0.20950857,0.00024213974,0.0067056236,0.002706028,0.5726261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046563346,0.0025226306,0.0027829874,0.0000056620083,0.000030774285,0.000022222444,0.0060411007,0.9828791,0.00064165227,0.0034278124,0.00092927064,0.0002511447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003263329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014337621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77337056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030491292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006097962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313555477","doi":"10.5463/thesis.19","title":"Developing guidelines for research institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cordis; Women's College Research Institute; European Commission","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Normative; Political science; Public relations; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Delphi method; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.985951791901373,"score_gpt":0.8104902801135969,"score_spread":0.17546151178777614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313555477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13261688,0.00631166,0.12479114,0.05343432,0.043515604,0.009597777,0.0008527891,0.0010330807,0.6278468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076341475,0.0014211925,0.03521021,0.00025884138,0.00084827835,0.00058834,0.0008438497,0.000070911345,0.9531242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786094,0.00019737272,0.0014738583,0.0012535063,0.017392142,0.001073736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103769,0.015614102,0.00024502233,0.00096817396,0.072445914,0.000349859],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.078195885,0.00021411358,0.00045330866,0.17695062,0.001243258,0.004431243,0.0041890764,0.00045839,0.0004148443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4654518,0.00014366918,0.00028831113,0.34064266,0.0001144042,0.0003486773,0.00047282362,0.0005611341,0.0036494234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872257,0.000018433773,0.00015861052,0.000029459896,0.000017581291,0.0000038009005,0.00009214631,0.00001503001,0.00008276653,0.072578035,0.7583683,0.16861711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021310792,0.000067431836,0.005285557,0.00006644447,0.000004793028,9.1206545e-7,0.0058755744,0.0013509283,0.0008369447,0.13275523,0.8532601,0.00028294645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003583775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021244371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3872559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003241247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004566628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99712634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313556842","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.01.005","title":"Global research on dental polymers and their application: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Saudi Dental Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University","keywords":"Scopus; Microsoft excel; Computer science; Visualization; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Data mining; Political science","score_opus":0.524923784932063,"score_gpt":0.5861494615660215,"score_spread":0.0612256766339585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313556842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98499477,0.0076641506,0.001754902,0.0010393277,0.00026691044,0.00021239728,0.00004703253,0.000026056814,0.003994454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994372,0.0044088955,0.000040523297,0.00006100599,0.00021516798,0.000010818183,0.0000036826648,0.000009614554,0.000878288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143595,0.00072085974,0.0006070959,0.0006643157,0.005707542,0.0008642703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237365,0.004860806,0.00021986234,0.0005703735,0.0012850857,0.00069022295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03856967,0.0001877741,0.00034900603,0.56337553,0.0017325913,0.0051214183,0.0021345855,0.000102013175,0.00016035372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004197145,0.00010069369,0.00024261115,0.9238724,0.0006051109,0.00043475523,0.0017670363,0.0006369036,0.0004858425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003142295,0.00007085611,0.512722,0.0000034012403,0.00016427581,0.000030803807,0.0002912266,0.000017523933,0.0002847698,0.0003138315,0.0050450205,0.48102483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041345172,0.0001395174,0.97568953,0.000013420378,0.000021090438,0.00036639426,0.0069658775,0.006469567,0.00010797531,0.0069081225,0.002771356,0.00013370845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011410828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000132593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48089114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024336771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001306487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313621144","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102659","title":"Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Publishing; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6199549595361636,"score_gpt":0.5971259394288214,"score_spread":0.022829020107342224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313621144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606272,0.0037363588,0.0011817375,0.026763055,0.0016184582,0.00034274845,0.000016386452,0.000038693073,0.0056753713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920241,0.003769332,0.0007092323,0.00039461383,0.00039749275,9.5153797e-7,0.0000010293493,0.000015574547,0.0026876295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899387,0.0011310016,0.0015734481,0.0003085183,0.006572269,0.00047608349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849624,0.008296584,0.0010685731,0.0006600844,0.00097191636,0.000506621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07262318,0.0001327652,0.00035496018,0.016319284,0.0003738522,0.0011577412,0.0022961802,0.00020390998,0.0005381386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026050027,0.00006759281,0.00011824022,0.0584506,0.00027175422,0.0018802027,0.00094959454,0.0014431734,0.000052340758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008664405,0.000052120402,0.14953664,0.000027725468,0.000065752676,0.00036559455,0.0011301455,0.000057321395,0.011135441,0.001709098,0.77438706,0.061446484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006622461,0.00044489827,0.7459517,0.0001343849,0.00005432624,0.0012679226,0.0022329765,0.0023165776,0.0018808106,0.13404301,0.11074906,0.00026207464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043703935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5782818e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.663638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052110798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076053006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4314446218","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v45i2.14869","title":"Les défis informationnels pour les étudiants au doctorat en médecine au Burkina Faso","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19548106300463616,"score_gpt":0.42527633332794257,"score_spread":0.2297952703233064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4314446218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92174846,0.0016654822,0.0028418915,0.04281849,0.0039781416,0.0002574888,0.00028234202,0.000023420458,0.02638429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928454,0.0014423534,0.0011722174,0.00052545924,0.00033762545,0.0000016071439,0.000013255474,0.0000074825575,0.0036545547],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280286,0.00020043222,0.0016116514,0.00022303131,0.003977391,0.0011846643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991952,0.0016395636,0.0008862552,0.0003426323,0.0020383867,0.003141141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017202329,0.00022752982,0.00035351663,0.07491488,0.0017679856,0.008255447,0.002924774,0.00019751345,0.0017347592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018396717,0.00017733414,0.00013321605,0.12679662,0.0013861142,0.044149227,0.000380224,0.00053468446,0.0008163878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012314545,0.000013554182,0.36261,0.000048946353,0.000012783052,0.00004019702,0.0059613055,0.00050850236,0.000031462605,0.013639789,0.04199839,0.5751228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061190216,0.00019096737,0.66558754,0.00013571295,0.0000062953327,0.0001706404,0.010176936,0.010774767,0.00019688893,0.0021598237,0.30975965,0.0002288606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007456284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013894963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5748939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007435159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022082891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700203","doi":"10.1111/head.14461","title":"Headache at a Janus moment: Reflecting back on the past 20 years of scholarly publishing and looking ahead to inevitable change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Origin BioMed (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Janus; Publishing; Moment (physics); History; Medicine; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.5843449614181208,"score_gpt":0.49705658934455715,"score_spread":0.0872883720735636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315700203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26201132,0.006692096,0.00037678407,0.72917616,0.00034723346,0.00063382817,0.000069524125,0.000009768222,0.00068328105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4558479,0.00562003,0.0012522814,0.5051309,0.007133161,0.000055237444,0.000024383879,0.00023675384,0.024699388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844814,0.0031869512,0.0015515856,0.00063235103,0.009086026,0.0010617131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96998346,0.025757056,0.001188196,0.00083968026,0.0018812314,0.00035038756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11518389,0.00035817915,0.00089532766,0.017201798,0.0006477975,0.007765082,0.0027510033,0.00048633272,0.000080563324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03834804,0.00019015383,0.00023551579,0.037538014,0.00023326032,0.002182447,0.0014458827,0.0041504675,0.00006811725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011377884,0.000039884875,0.01013956,0.000066707835,0.00008460306,0.000078114914,0.0026139643,0.000019517627,0.0005907886,0.000017087648,0.9363167,0.04991926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634958,0.001302788,0.013824003,0.0007861519,0.000051065956,0.0001714979,0.0030419198,0.0007159083,0.00012784413,0.00117674,0.97779304,0.00037410518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004246993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015840914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22404528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003009924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001853971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316506829","doi":"10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1","title":"Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Publication; Gender gap; Scopus; Publishing; Impact factor; Set (abstract data type); Library science; Computer science; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.4825958844803239,"score_gpt":0.5822433334994175,"score_spread":0.09964744901909356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316506829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956551,0.00029936162,0.000014067021,0.0010583363,0.0014242785,0.00026407704,0.00006599724,0.0002197966,0.0009989708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734,0.00006730023,0.0000487922,0.00017670346,0.0009005,0.000022157667,0.0000587685,0.000017237695,0.0013685076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076736,0.00030433014,0.0006563223,0.00084590324,0.0068604057,0.0005656732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948715,0.001239954,0.00039095187,0.0007820779,0.0022662843,0.00044924172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017024232,0.0001793251,0.00029878656,0.030089537,0.0005425806,0.0014504625,0.0017476679,0.00083112286,0.00021715596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009594425,0.00013493009,0.00010000827,0.09202822,0.00014790498,0.00078852125,0.00087506126,0.0018908925,0.00024436056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015559838,0.000048217575,0.78276896,0.0000036885588,0.0000040039827,0.000006862422,0.00012390446,6.460554e-7,0.00010491369,0.00044792664,0.2146529,0.0018364415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023525619,0.000029800334,0.9825913,0.0000046772275,0.000009106878,0.0000022299778,0.00031422413,0.00024716495,0.00014653074,0.0039096945,0.0123440195,0.00016600903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062165615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034716642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20230888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113527116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006197546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316661435","doi":"10.1038/d41586-023-00028-x","title":"Self-publishing is common among academic-journal editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.3463642669259725,"score_gpt":0.5661157677873855,"score_spread":0.21975150086141298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316661435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225698,0.002324707,0.000072000934,0.0360492,0.021447167,0.00021836448,0.00006863981,0.0002598433,0.016990278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98324525,0.00069028314,0.00041314276,0.0019567085,0.007276275,0.0000037986586,0.000008594313,0.000021516347,0.0063843993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821073,0.00022964331,0.00063072884,0.0005851045,0.015626462,0.00082075136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907407,0.0044440706,0.0003289719,0.000608683,0.0031823744,0.00069518754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03475413,0.00015359969,0.0002778227,0.061088547,0.0005755525,0.009929323,0.0049438733,0.0023663861,0.00051790377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059083365,0.00010093607,0.00020778131,0.2784438,0.0000897731,0.0034941372,0.0011463589,0.011363185,0.0009809528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003357334,0.000012679672,0.17516026,0.000002065949,0.000009578832,0.00003769776,0.00021433838,0.0000058751157,0.000033760665,0.0001289694,0.7985347,0.025856728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023298533,0.000032925986,0.22858691,0.000009441061,0.0000037244247,0.000016166638,0.00043759597,0.003779256,0.0003265211,0.010848957,0.7555883,0.00013718921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014645772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037885761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21735528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014243709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020695363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317840362","doi":"10.1136/bmj.p152","title":"Assessing the relevance of research for clinicians","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMJ","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9235373531145914,"score_gpt":0.7534069448768983,"score_spread":0.1701304082376931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317840362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077709067,0.00054821494,0.0017646705,0.9829339,0.0028030754,0.0014049322,0.00017099282,0.00003047035,0.009566665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013133053,0.001754166,0.00905655,0.4383335,0.039447587,0.0012688661,0.00016016049,0.000353448,0.49649268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689122,0.0016627592,0.0017829982,0.0011700677,0.025195712,0.0012763018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77623934,0.20872408,0.00084541115,0.0024539288,0.011626062,0.00011121469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19033396,0.00017201503,0.00057173544,0.060128503,0.0005627078,0.003967268,0.006851743,0.0006784333,0.00012115555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42721912,0.00009304443,0.00043957186,0.22960283,0.00073344423,0.00033014544,0.0013010926,0.0026641565,0.00077528274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004650519,0.000013084391,0.00064695673,0.00003835998,0.000015180969,0.000035810543,0.00003244795,0.000005703553,0.000013598183,0.00007710444,0.947599,0.051518135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001263289,0.000105262545,0.0029133286,0.00006877262,0.0000052098985,0.0000027233807,0.00035793972,0.0012883215,0.000047398644,0.025433542,0.96953136,0.00011983493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009242666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014300455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54460037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010492409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009562003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318256456","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.72","title":"Opening a “closed door”: A call for nuance in discussions of open science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Call to action; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Psychology; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.7030676785218101,"score_gpt":0.6271971466744402,"score_spread":0.07587053184736992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318256456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97763,0.00011750061,0.0019278183,0.014205773,0.0012254309,0.0010470644,0.0002671924,0.0000069719786,0.0035722065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979227,0.000009282626,0.0008097548,0.00036168625,0.00006321947,0.00003908208,0.0000099515155,0.0000063378616,0.0007779403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960264,0.00020866626,0.00055439473,0.00064563355,0.002258622,0.000306302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675566,0.0016249418,0.00021135836,0.00030008896,0.00095335534,0.00015458518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014355114,0.000072279676,0.0002371477,0.012448714,0.00052861543,0.00049078965,0.0035700349,0.000062001905,0.0009783388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024061067,0.00005238095,0.000024630403,0.10489362,0.00034985947,0.00038543617,0.0027043594,0.00023520277,0.0000051015036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015939065,0.0010560385,0.6819929,0.0000032954883,0.000021471418,0.00001478041,0.0009618385,0.0006117213,0.02019034,0.08849037,0.07745825,0.12760511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014489572,0.00318834,0.6422535,0.00002043432,0.000012932202,0.00007194195,0.00204219,0.0047474992,0.002006598,0.16796525,0.1626088,0.0005929514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006332291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023625465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12701216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006841546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059918687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318481538","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.38458","title":"Le statut universitaire pour les bibliothécaires de l’Université Laval","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.35188711970902187,"score_gpt":0.427682355851891,"score_spread":0.07579523614286915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318481538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824706,0.050411962,0.0011176533,0.31462798,0.0044365255,0.00021952862,0.0005233985,0.00004430297,0.04614808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8900332,0.020698126,0.0005999597,0.0005245,0.0012011034,4.4703037e-7,0.000006798849,0.00005178699,0.086884074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250776,0.000852642,0.0009647586,0.0004914859,0.0033247548,0.0018585835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788446,0.0043777856,0.0006249159,0.00042409776,0.0016374387,0.005051285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013026517,0.00028241213,0.00052320707,0.1534729,0.0009762108,0.0023129806,0.0054914015,0.00089498423,0.0026724928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015800029,0.00027855,0.000416307,0.22443128,0.000702484,0.0048688757,0.00035825503,0.0025911634,0.0005560682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003100188,0.000013035353,0.22330038,0.000021328666,0.00006636399,0.002457078,0.0011986388,0.00025539348,0.00015866771,0.028294662,0.65326893,0.09093452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010479359,0.00024476135,0.19674571,0.00023734696,0.000044850753,0.0004103027,0.016503664,0.0007356649,0.00054729526,0.022822132,0.760313,0.00034736953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027171986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006584957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31410345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008771453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08040332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318483628","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v8.38458","title":"Le statut universitaire pour les bibliothécaires de l’Université Laval","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35188711970902187,"score_gpt":0.427682355851891,"score_spread":0.07579523614286915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318483628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824706,0.050411962,0.0011176533,0.31462798,0.0044365255,0.00021952862,0.0005233985,0.00004430297,0.04614808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8900332,0.020698126,0.0005999597,0.0005245,0.0012011034,4.4703037e-7,0.000006798849,0.00005178699,0.086884074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250776,0.000852642,0.0009647586,0.0004914859,0.0033247548,0.0018585835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788446,0.0043777856,0.0006249159,0.00042409776,0.0016374387,0.005051285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013026517,0.00028241213,0.00052320707,0.1534729,0.0009762108,0.0023129806,0.0054914015,0.00089498423,0.0026724928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015800029,0.00027855,0.000416307,0.22443128,0.000702484,0.0048688757,0.00035825503,0.0025911634,0.0005560682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003100188,0.000013035353,0.22330038,0.000021328666,0.00006636399,0.002457078,0.0011986388,0.00025539348,0.00015866771,0.028294662,0.65326893,0.09093452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010479359,0.00024476135,0.19674571,0.00023734696,0.000044850753,0.0004103027,0.016503664,0.0007356649,0.00054729526,0.022822132,0.760313,0.00034736953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027171986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006584957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31410345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008771453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08040332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318701103","doi":"10.3233/jpd-229011","title":"The Journal of Parkinson’s Disease Takes the Open Road","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Parkinson s Disease","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"Parkinson's Foundation","keywords":"Parkinson's disease; Disease; Medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.2988133647322714,"score_gpt":0.5266866848664992,"score_spread":0.22787332013422779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318701103","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009794907,0.07890623,0.00027185938,0.007845649,0.8995837,0.00096170756,0.0014191772,0.000008871099,0.0012079302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14724286,0.056697726,0.00023589125,0.0005935135,0.7825646,0.000058952635,0.000037319387,0.00018592527,0.012383234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9453838,0.004467493,0.0043553347,0.00075060956,0.04390871,0.0011340671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8947843,0.05463277,0.015844485,0.0039591244,0.025045948,0.0057334146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.105221756,0.0005975992,0.0014295706,0.02244775,0.0020691773,0.012810383,0.030032942,0.00028258344,0.0021093274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24485168,0.0002742933,0.0017893515,0.05216218,0.0006988559,0.0017339607,0.0034561276,0.0040407297,0.000064588414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034206356,0.00047636035,0.007960976,0.000018631594,0.00021619612,0.0008170976,0.00013668148,0.0001935431,0.0000034189854,0.000032621836,0.9390123,0.04771154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014300309,0.0005134236,0.052876346,0.0000917977,0.00035161935,0.00002684938,0.0011131914,0.00021504864,0.00000259981,0.0030191692,0.9400334,0.00032655016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008940478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002858578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13962993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008072159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012148652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318707934","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/5yt4r","title":"The Growing Concentration of National Influence in Global Science and Its Impact on Future Research.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Construct (python library); Scientific field; Metadata; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Scientometrics; Scale (ratio); Quarter (Canadian coin); Data science; Regional science; Field (mathematics); Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Engineering; Cartography","score_opus":0.6694255633085026,"score_gpt":0.6741706629394555,"score_spread":0.004745099630952931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318707934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98812944,0.0008061786,0.000018055067,0.0047542695,0.00062558503,0.0005026547,0.00010378172,0.000013305746,0.005046731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985477,0.0009915107,0.000047855934,0.00006451974,0.00009326221,0.000017674425,0.000002047187,0.000004519174,0.00023093961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96144646,0.0005114379,0.00081966986,0.0011045629,0.035302717,0.0008151223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630495,0.011275438,0.00028889606,0.0006742138,0.024360567,0.00035141638],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12847683,0.00015391357,0.0002596923,0.027798792,0.00059663056,0.004467465,0.004115171,0.00018902023,0.00002737487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17524002,0.000079570775,0.00008007549,0.23637712,0.0010135346,0.0011856375,0.0036842537,0.0008809177,0.000070480484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000308574,0.00028153657,0.39893198,0.00006359849,0.000046055873,0.00003319331,0.0006601908,0.02338249,0.0050115925,0.40681493,0.02269805,0.1417678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017207753,0.00010998196,0.8820701,0.000045837583,5.445405e-7,0.0000015867203,0.00053500425,0.033175644,0.0006738672,0.08252377,0.0005816928,0.00010988522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044187065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087948916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4831381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011324247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004326569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318909628","doi":"","title":"Three common sources of error in peer review and how to minimize them","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8921907250717775,"score_gpt":0.7287524652946374,"score_spread":0.1634382597771401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318909628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92073965,0.057663817,0.00029154908,0.011982564,0.0003458709,0.00076245895,0.00008167587,0.000006065559,0.008126326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96873736,0.02819082,0.0007227904,0.00038624374,0.000051473777,0.000022415303,0.0000011879089,0.00001998256,0.0018677184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889583,0.0003589606,0.0011711855,0.0007098277,0.0083393995,0.0005247995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98883367,0.0032648395,0.0017577325,0.0016373729,0.003926365,0.0005800047],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03988068,0.00024581974,0.0013882469,0.022093834,0.000421595,0.011062875,0.014165228,0.0001093205,0.005238751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06566438,0.00016601161,0.00020349979,0.03422821,0.0003703809,0.003240868,0.005774737,0.00041208547,0.000032584114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044291366,0.00010369996,0.8011178,0.00007079901,0.00002533777,0.00001698477,0.000059590635,0.0000035672124,0.0011996793,0.000034892928,0.117198266,0.080125116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037817314,0.000014294064,0.9641435,0.00049673603,0.000023875467,0.000008101414,0.00009202958,0.000078997495,0.0019485779,0.007929752,0.024673233,0.00021274478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011436152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031501657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16302572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053871263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015078843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319439027","doi":"10.2196/44633","title":"Factors Associated With Open Access Publishing Costs in Oncology Journals: Cross-sectional Observational Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Elekta; University of Alabama; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Observational study; Medicine; Impact factor; Internal medicine; Family medicine; Oncology; Political science","score_opus":0.9635569213506799,"score_gpt":0.7681482277872382,"score_spread":0.1954086935634417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319439027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846613,0.00002416908,0.00004610535,0.0014178393,0.000330535,0.0015096682,0.00013821026,0.000035037297,0.0118371565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765706,0.00001781383,0.000008954208,0.000050275718,0.00005814571,0.00032803966,0.00008023972,0.000016984763,0.0017824918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96757495,0.0033653034,0.0013738554,0.0009057342,0.025251737,0.0015284432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464691,0.03551017,0.00053497416,0.000602681,0.01627692,0.0006061022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16320029,0.00019558659,0.00050979364,0.09036163,0.0013469561,0.0690045,0.012050331,0.00024178972,0.0014516255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13172594,0.00012024683,0.00008949475,0.371627,0.00040485067,0.024168154,0.0095198965,0.0021593475,0.00027825835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009849817,0.00092741306,0.96231717,0.000002205666,0.00004310318,0.000037237165,0.0021796518,0.00018665775,0.0000132549,0.0002821326,0.025730265,0.008182426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018120311,0.00081680587,0.978812,0.00002196086,5.873695e-7,0.0000013672206,0.008076844,0.0035854343,0.000023231585,0.004517859,0.0021808462,0.00015107915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007543724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017067709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28126538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025145677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002140299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319603604","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2022.12.011","title":"Championing inclusive terminology in ecology and evolution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of California Berkeley; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Terminology; Inclusion (mineral); Harm; Discipline; Ecology; Sociology; Evolutionary ecology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Political science; Social science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.3002922736533268,"score_gpt":0.5339535607174793,"score_spread":0.23366128706415257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319603604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203795,0.00026861008,0.000183718,0.0047485433,0.0009060143,0.00016194445,0.00000946882,0.00005782853,0.0016259004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978329,0.00012990819,0.00014182007,0.00007809726,0.00006515004,0.00006318354,0.000018720402,0.000010062599,0.0016601402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949574,0.00076147134,0.0008666131,0.000991708,0.0013317723,0.0010910637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532324,0.0034262007,0.00024216679,0.00042197888,0.00042515286,0.00016125117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012194992,0.0001751411,0.0004629264,0.115271255,0.00026863092,0.0001323896,0.00084583194,0.00048821888,0.00019111166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012343098,0.0001571443,0.00006712697,0.12669829,0.00044929347,0.00047612865,0.001159839,0.0005059008,0.00046424376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030436338,0.000089500194,0.95929223,0.0000018430135,0.000004668547,0.000064751155,0.00020291314,0.000616693,0.00023425883,0.0036379623,0.0019358257,0.0338889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009002255,0.00026172897,0.9159797,0.000003992507,0.0000025987858,0.000030902647,0.00054090103,0.036065694,0.000011596063,0.045462877,0.00060494145,0.0001348653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003092626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007338104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04331257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011744765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002059674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319944791","doi":"10.1097/md.0000000000032926","title":"Top 100 most-cited articles on renal cell carcinoma: A bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; Web of science; Descriptive statistics; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation analysis; Publishing; Citation database; MEDLINE; Statistics; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Scopus; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5215840460889631,"score_gpt":0.5463267918712595,"score_spread":0.024742745782296405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319944791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761177,0.00084036245,0.0011854948,0.0060605938,0.00041666944,0.00019746968,0.000028059403,0.00010146947,0.015052182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860864,0.00020350904,0.00010377603,0.00052415533,0.0002930499,0.00001475639,0.000029952133,0.00001483029,0.0127295265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830993,0.00029728768,0.0009524623,0.001031125,0.013679036,0.00094077946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874381,0.007947874,0.00025723112,0.0013084492,0.002253004,0.0007953435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023003882,0.00022337274,0.00064964476,0.9079994,0.0003171192,0.00069183315,0.0020591216,0.00012623079,0.0031331123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045380898,0.00013383893,0.00023018345,0.98827773,0.00025385327,0.00025227922,0.0005002896,0.00033529967,0.0029277932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054863638,0.0001968703,0.45567176,0.0000065656895,0.0000758414,0.00022243401,0.00026664807,0.00064763305,0.0041447864,0.00019829886,0.3744208,0.1640935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010887419,0.00075860583,0.92862123,0.0000063725547,0.00009266025,0.0000024368405,0.000484431,0.02996715,0.0042123045,0.0014237823,0.03314856,0.00019371978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004981623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002077382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47294948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010344837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011665691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321088024","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1098319","title":"Embracing diversity during researcher evaluation in the academic scientific environment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz; Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Bottleneck; Diversity (politics); Computer science; Mathematics education; Political science; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5909706161472336,"score_gpt":0.5720299002343835,"score_spread":0.01894071591285007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321088024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992083,0.0007507217,0.00018090727,0.0019382094,0.0024996314,0.00051045604,0.0000034182638,0.000009069385,0.002024596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683344,0.00015428293,0.00024205362,0.00003287566,0.000085391635,0.00006273541,0.000016788155,0.0000043142195,0.0025681148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886061,0.0009051348,0.00039611678,0.000610191,0.009003092,0.0004793733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806803,0.0007661377,0.000106590094,0.00058556115,0.00037446726,0.00009920357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.071062386,0.00007356354,0.00011101984,0.045723986,0.0006028759,0.0008297326,0.0018568533,0.000089968285,0.00014864781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538529,0.000053273456,0.000042802876,0.11833389,0.00016462084,0.00069562026,0.0007762454,0.00045102587,0.00031606908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014019669,0.00009453573,0.76272386,0.0000044705503,0.0000017239062,0.0000014706044,0.0046203313,0.00097110623,0.00029341044,0.0000641383,0.056467604,0.17474334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018914504,0.000008468742,0.9349663,0.000009214423,0.0000017008301,5.1600097e-7,0.013418982,0.013546608,0.00009304379,0.03324026,0.0044621667,0.00006356568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001296158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002289601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17467977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008169961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039966023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99290854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321375960","doi":"10.3389/frma.2023.1040823","title":"Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Robert Bosch Stiftung; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Productivity; Affect (linguistics); Workload; Psychology; Publication; Perspective (graphical); Demographic economics; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.9005667755092183,"score_gpt":0.6405828413056083,"score_spread":0.25998393420361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321375960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958598,0.006819195,0.008821474,0.003167757,0.0017990775,0.0010851448,0.000115146,0.000072488845,0.019521682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090636,0.0013144955,0.0007379226,0.000011744445,0.000032696942,0.000022798611,0.000017670109,0.000019100384,0.0069371853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810281,0.0010543141,0.00071621925,0.0015219545,0.013931796,0.0017476089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98453265,0.00832067,0.00016946836,0.0010310371,0.0052663335,0.00067984906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.094077535,0.00021417206,0.000523005,0.30708578,0.00055289594,0.006340838,0.0023628601,0.0002299368,0.000076553464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14478399,0.00015689572,0.00014274,0.57332736,0.00079275825,0.00091175304,0.0013286012,0.0010578631,0.00010206477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010604494,0.00013358827,0.8612126,0.0000101308615,0.000015852445,0.0000282498,0.0010750933,0.00006928319,0.00003061277,0.0032058668,0.117255725,0.016952373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055489334,0.00010407367,0.73418057,0.000011273656,0.000004171829,6.427093e-7,0.028322576,0.13887557,0.00015675905,0.0778896,0.019634191,0.00026567635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021673387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008189255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26624158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009453912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046680015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99469066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321505149","doi":"10.1051/pmed/2022041","title":"Vers une science ouverte francophone en santé. Le champ de l’éducation médicale est aussi concerné","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pédagogie médicale","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; French; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.46024608885648244,"score_gpt":0.5621528636645791,"score_spread":0.10190677480809662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321505149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8211063,0.016383315,0.013515821,0.07586537,0.020218376,0.0010187093,0.00034586884,0.00045486627,0.05109134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86115927,0.008583671,0.0010532946,0.00083563494,0.001005366,0.00006662722,0.000024640842,0.00005763977,0.12721387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790129,0.0008993923,0.00129749,0.0021563214,0.0135042975,0.0031295693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860755,0.0071104257,0.00041239394,0.0017643769,0.002213359,0.0024239114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043143712,0.00047832224,0.00076028425,0.034813896,0.0018612726,0.0032206355,0.0063908803,0.0005699744,0.0032436317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04860408,0.00043031448,0.00035919246,0.35275173,0.005222759,0.0017098436,0.0023349691,0.0011408097,0.013185843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046926303,0.00074119476,0.011227059,0.000061326624,0.000036777154,0.00017879852,0.0073734224,0.0003223995,0.010985055,0.0015476227,0.21417929,0.75330013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019341592,0.00042560886,0.119584106,0.00014075344,0.000015969621,0.000041755426,0.033226658,0.0640135,0.007612538,0.011721259,0.7603999,0.0008838283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062525272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002183071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7524163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020821749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015969379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611368","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00248","title":"Impact of geographic diversity on citation of collaborative research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Citation; Perspective (graphical); Geographical distance; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Scale (ratio); Data science; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.9158071959647329,"score_gpt":0.7441541280930054,"score_spread":0.17165306787172752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948559,0.0004739603,0.000057590136,0.00027573912,0.00024798486,0.00030592975,0.000105645675,0.000014577676,0.0036626807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.0008171475,0.0004401071,0.0000041189733,0.000008104123,0.000007952221,9.2226486e-7,0.0000035393068,0.00023258955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98081416,0.0006798394,0.0005840343,0.0007461234,0.016493285,0.00068253966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934672,0.022119885,0.00045200606,0.0006124064,0.041930202,0.00021352185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07156343,0.0001243268,0.0004593036,0.1064305,0.0014805868,0.00024414252,0.0022762727,0.000039251147,0.000039556766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19347554,0.00007650417,0.00017409414,0.5103058,0.007447093,0.00086552015,0.0024814364,0.00021031401,0.00017332612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012885782,0.00016562715,0.9367593,0.000012152102,0.00009415064,0.0000040690084,0.011248037,0.0005051408,0.011622714,0.028025564,0.004904212,0.0065302067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021693874,0.0022512656,0.91753435,0.00002367783,0.0000028761451,1.0761384e-7,0.030772757,0.0012416253,0.002523304,0.045333806,0.000020659092,0.00007863556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024709335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003056535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40387535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017814321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060963334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611868","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04657-x","title":"Research mobility to the United States: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"China; Presidency; Political science; Politics; Cohort; Demographic economics; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8030659521882623,"score_gpt":0.6690166332988601,"score_spread":0.1340493188894022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701576,0.00049703417,0.013830964,0.008682446,0.0013718301,0.0010978669,0.00028493197,0.00025150858,0.003825785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985088,0.0007876728,0.000467117,0.0007191326,0.0001571317,0.00012455505,0.00009741748,0.000029945786,0.012529053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92013186,0.002395172,0.0017447245,0.0027264983,0.06943381,0.0035679506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.885332,0.066013634,0.0004302859,0.006325702,0.038647898,0.0032504827],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34870318,0.00033672655,0.00072068407,0.98879325,0.0022532472,0.013326163,0.013679617,0.00022967416,0.0011767289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3806984,0.00019512812,0.0006172929,0.9995631,0.0008058267,0.00075782574,0.0060271337,0.0011527071,0.019717226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033390083,0.0003906965,0.2956139,0.000008855273,0.00018888144,0.000038679857,0.0010999434,0.045648254,0.00005268309,0.0008521748,0.50724,0.14883254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017655609,0.00018766867,0.5808696,0.0000021306591,0.000026603646,0.000001241232,0.002007274,0.08368258,0.00007061494,0.0020613857,0.33070713,0.00020720091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016366033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018649384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2852557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067706814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004983443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356342","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00250","title":"An open data set of scholars on Twitter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Event (particle physics); Set (abstract data type); Open data; Matching (statistics); Open science; World Wide Web; Data set; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9676859895836807,"score_gpt":0.7752727570725012,"score_spread":0.19241323251117948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98907965,0.00033938058,0.00024302492,0.0026160725,0.00072578824,0.0003631132,0.00025428878,0.000032817687,0.0063458527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950615,0.00031639167,0.0034987205,0.0001897618,0.000025691565,0.000010606205,0.000008415134,0.0000072014823,0.00088167074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98613507,0.00035558123,0.0006196986,0.0015259373,0.010693384,0.00067031116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838663,0.0069097416,0.00031816997,0.0025395842,0.006081601,0.0002846113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08227329,0.0001442364,0.00042627132,0.040280472,0.00094213913,0.0027735168,0.018773535,0.0000307043,0.000087383814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1459059,0.00008769184,0.000036856458,0.29097277,0.0029133682,0.005076125,0.010624959,0.00019266253,0.0011712633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025563192,0.00061940355,0.21654363,0.00003443322,0.00019592833,0.000080845406,0.02163148,0.00070959073,0.06460918,0.119682446,0.36397386,0.21166359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008267585,0.0036346614,0.7445951,0.00007432913,0.000012365178,0.0000021071667,0.11137458,0.02692224,0.008792989,0.080886744,0.02233118,0.0005469031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000745255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026974347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006291678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041196492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772344","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0053","title":"<i>Demystifying Scholarly Metrics: A Practical Guide</i> by Marc W. Vinyard and Jaimie Beth Colvin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.5346945761361885,"score_gpt":0.5485700388656584,"score_spread":0.013875462729469823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79185647,0.014187918,0.015914716,0.15651305,0.0034470316,0.00056689366,0.0001798104,0.00015079218,0.017183319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93224406,0.006520209,0.047386102,0.0038246391,0.001328969,0.000012373511,0.000016157996,0.00011323933,0.008554237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96520627,0.0013237973,0.00297347,0.0010363363,0.028089533,0.0013705977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398171,0.025476672,0.0024382202,0.0009955637,0.028812401,0.0024600793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19604474,0.00032668118,0.0008600328,0.086561285,0.00093661336,0.35578883,0.005139792,0.0005569141,0.0002824584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6889595,0.00023956706,0.00035413573,0.22362912,0.00022587796,0.19955179,0.002602941,0.005431149,0.00026475213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053367196,0.00011474115,0.14572042,0.000013550242,0.00007336513,0.000286132,0.00015687181,0.000008964037,0.0050428165,0.0006477623,0.75038064,0.097501375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001894381,0.00054318877,0.064538635,0.000103960454,0.000055542034,0.00062112714,0.0033585231,0.0020495593,0.0006210395,0.014493969,0.9112437,0.00047637508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012625691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006924727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49291477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050859665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012493965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99686337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772350","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0049","title":"What Can Be Learned about Predatory Journals from a Failed Study? Possible Motivations behind Predatory Journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Grammar; Documentation; Compromise; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.62953521345765,"score_gpt":0.5478280282914975,"score_spread":0.0817071851661525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597394,0.0080348,0.00066556345,0.025814287,0.004251598,0.0004516387,0.00020354243,0.00005953562,0.0007796513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731506,0.00318616,0.0010432081,0.0009504287,0.0015914084,0.000010998026,0.000012197156,0.00006315212,0.0058273952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574059,0.0024365005,0.004229961,0.0010643782,0.03347124,0.0013920157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946077,0.010681242,0.0045458535,0.0015790977,0.034657437,0.0024593882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15450838,0.00041983527,0.001150375,0.1055856,0.0015892718,0.44051355,0.009997955,0.00057859335,0.0026389195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32009065,0.00030651334,0.0006763601,0.12845936,0.00017817496,0.23200504,0.0021211545,0.0063811317,0.00014850804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089726804,0.00056756666,0.8114066,0.0000065481477,0.0003731189,0.0004195255,0.007446118,0.0005256999,0.0039040959,0.00003153453,0.119450256,0.055779204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022656105,0.00043633542,0.91334844,0.00029206031,0.00005695101,0.00006988568,0.042533323,0.0005816566,0.00036745227,0.0097383,0.029946173,0.00036382163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025494196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019103172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20850852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002418506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4323772433","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0016","title":"Open Citations as a Tool for Bibliometric Verification and Transparency and for Correcting Erroneous References","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Accounting; Library science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.7417604793083047,"score_gpt":0.5951478137790643,"score_spread":0.14661266552924035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597247,0.00196136,0.026379656,0.009573387,0.0008476805,0.00066217984,0.00007825342,0.000016279953,0.0007564967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843056,0.0008800079,0.013566401,0.00013462716,0.00015621705,0.00003703025,0.000008161693,0.000013092471,0.0008988336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937095,0.00017400294,0.001144408,0.0004768919,0.004083485,0.00041173483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96623194,0.01827102,0.001099538,0.0003043306,0.013651261,0.0004418862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06980826,0.00011463828,0.00034807855,0.27052978,0.00076714664,0.15816468,0.0027168838,0.00015226494,0.000026980757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36868048,0.000084337655,0.00010379255,0.4118165,0.000064388674,0.05677462,0.00041550474,0.00053440715,0.0000051499524],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012250603,0.00005481237,0.08581823,0.000028883705,0.00003699858,0.0000050343956,0.0008132687,0.00003060732,0.0011904356,0.0017935779,0.031465966,0.8786397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034513236,0.001892024,0.768104,0.00012914347,0.000062433384,0.0002213395,0.010245174,0.007789266,0.0003778306,0.13243236,0.074896954,0.0003981182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007787593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016366419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87824154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006850641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042593488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95782816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772434","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0005","title":"Predatory Journals: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Literature Published between 2012 and 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientometrics; Reading (process); Library science; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Citation; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.6089117459446791,"score_gpt":0.6088191351660769,"score_spread":0.00009261077860223121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96544313,0.021889165,0.0020513867,0.009149059,0.00033626653,0.00009691887,0.0002787534,0.0000070943333,0.00074822933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922251,0.0024874492,0.004136913,0.000084311556,0.00021795335,0.0000012642809,0.000013933608,0.000013560921,0.0008194925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824564,0.0019468672,0.0022546507,0.0005618615,0.012253654,0.0005265748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411232,0.022673246,0.0029750308,0.0005321527,0.03162028,0.0010761179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16809201,0.00018928053,0.0010636249,0.15577306,0.00030554758,0.13369428,0.0023455094,0.0003275903,0.0002832406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34448007,0.00012602372,0.000357857,0.29119432,0.00025353231,0.14431529,0.00100241,0.0023141743,0.0000061048445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083142106,0.000078588964,0.8415176,0.000028369928,0.0018988231,0.00007024793,0.0252122,0.00005476248,0.0011619631,0.0023947807,0.05962351,0.06787599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068177044,0.000312859,0.93930817,0.00012406739,0.00025338362,0.000018544337,0.028134068,0.00086107745,0.00006750704,0.022944875,0.007115529,0.0001781629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003490433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011449256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17638807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084306914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033848576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324145313","doi":"10.32388/3ojyk1","title":"Review of: \"Measuring researchers’ success more fairly: going beyond the H-index\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.813147762879632,"score_gpt":0.6387775037866626,"score_spread":0.17437025909296933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324145313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002881433,0.7099604,0.00031104978,0.19783425,0.0027445701,0.001869539,0.00036915127,0.000076735036,0.08680549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00015774292,0.58327794,0.00010624611,0.006372429,0.00028967395,0.00010550054,0.00008044166,0.00006196621,0.40954804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9479491,0.0017183009,0.0030529455,0.0020134551,0.043601338,0.0016648513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93501914,0.032248072,0.0019403187,0.006031928,0.023675745,0.0010848062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17424546,0.00058427313,0.0021530013,0.05517119,0.00055578887,0.0024928343,0.016025739,0.00042913112,0.006802899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27046,0.00029904634,0.0012055573,0.37982395,0.0007268575,0.00058313954,0.0058372472,0.0023566408,0.0028315752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032869457,0.000033018045,0.00075114396,0.011327194,0.000052842417,0.000021672251,0.00001882652,0.0000016441676,0.0000020902887,0.00008955969,0.8502822,0.13741653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013973152,0.000055923236,0.0014008677,0.025494996,0.000051830437,0.00000820877,0.00010900804,0.00028347818,0.000019914789,0.001106595,0.970958,0.0003714277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011213415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028686158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32465276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003188939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019306767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327679266","doi":"10.1111/cars.12428","title":"The gender citation gap: Why and how it matters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Gender gap; Salary; Perspective (graphical); Wage; Gender bias; Productivity; Gender disparity; Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6570824872764965,"score_gpt":0.503201694649877,"score_spread":0.15388079262661958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327679266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4987622,0.058952525,0.0001080023,0.43814114,0.0011132159,0.00078878424,0.0003188228,0.00004404925,0.0017712669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839587,0.08750925,0.00017639733,0.026528316,0.00015236883,0.00010249954,0.000057853085,0.00002434214,0.0014902481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550235,0.000972966,0.00058361527,0.0006624828,0.00058558467,0.0016929952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860894,0.009943814,0.00037159116,0.0007621537,0.0015702094,0.0012628165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03449878,0.00020418953,0.00056236284,0.0073085343,0.00075128826,0.00025804024,0.0019156102,0.00031135848,0.00015371159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06842795,0.00013934265,0.00022993106,0.021380147,0.0016854905,0.0001710442,0.00021683371,0.00045811143,0.00013202487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020676812,0.0000031853726,0.05566809,0.00033641138,0.00005327246,0.00004972939,0.001784999,0.0000039503925,0.00008355742,0.008867731,0.8996545,0.033492476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024381904,0.00012531794,0.40773064,0.00027139304,0.000038085967,0.00003292693,0.025572043,0.00044068941,0.00000445429,0.08560359,0.4795638,0.00037322962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004107042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057126433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008994351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012697956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361012827","doi":"10.1177/25152459221144986","title":"The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science Community From Scratch","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Open science; Grassroots; Mainstream; China; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.6851263766474375,"score_gpt":0.7785367102522119,"score_spread":0.09341033360477446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361012827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95350224,0.002117025,0.0050701653,0.0036150627,0.0022486139,0.0009576834,0.00000812092,0.000036836896,0.03244425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75668645,0.004924916,0.23727159,0.0008935834,0.0000739846,0.000069994356,6.0348975e-7,0.0000072566613,0.000071632625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97591543,0.006282206,0.0014758554,0.0036525757,0.01007096,0.0026029495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224764,0.06917234,0.0014189733,0.0038698218,0.0019574712,0.0011050052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52009606,0.000288155,0.0005665859,0.011194958,0.00812154,0.032449428,0.06745973,0.00011390008,0.000081767525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37135336,0.00015349015,0.00003736477,0.4210367,0.015417553,0.02770303,0.03325545,0.0016766794,0.0000326952],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115553485,0.00022372928,0.16236006,0.0000011820914,9.3456106e-7,0.000014576328,0.000377795,0.0005068312,0.00828804,0.009724902,0.00010624995,0.81828016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003084615,0.00029458222,0.47147134,0.00001678374,0.0000011100266,0.000004311001,0.0016073028,0.015765278,0.0001600038,0.50196147,0.008204423,0.00020490732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002211936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009947267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81807524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024344427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074920594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362458627","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2023-004380","title":"Association of literature metrics in gynecologic oncology with country classification by income level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Citation; Gross national income; Middle income country; Publishing; Demography; High income countries; Developing country; China; Family medicine; Gynecology; Internal medicine; Socioeconomics; Library science; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.6804300321512953,"score_gpt":0.6334504089332188,"score_spread":0.04697962321807647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362458627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018282877,0.99081105,0.0002760335,0.0012959021,0.0032219498,0.00047849052,0.0012092687,0.000011440443,0.0008675682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034886755,0.9935884,0.000349338,0.00010497793,0.0002637066,0.00005290866,0.000053554886,0.000021429569,0.002077001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846336,0.0011026282,0.003139433,0.0005897709,0.010056199,0.0004783566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512793,0.03103554,0.006428694,0.00028226533,0.010739908,0.0002343042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02327456,0.00032190356,0.002168811,0.03724602,0.000054446416,0.00073666713,0.0041856267,0.0010869626,0.00075761875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09133675,0.000177626,0.0005004061,0.07980809,0.00014506365,0.00051325484,0.00048795383,0.0016705159,0.000051028506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008172004,0.0004574058,0.027573545,0.00021052564,0.00047774805,0.0002447199,0.000036336478,0.00004152255,0.000004090724,0.00023893276,0.023916584,0.94671685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084461586,0.00077018933,0.026312064,0.0012378079,0.00012222119,0.000041821895,0.00006549284,0.00011026292,0.0000021301985,0.0011381152,0.9691242,0.00023109543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042270673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002289102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94648576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005520735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00213964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362524064","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011514","title":"The impact of COVID-19 on global health journals: an analysis of impact factor and publication trends","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Wuhan University","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Impact factor; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Outbreak; Medicine; Demography; Geography; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Sociology; Virology; Computer science","score_opus":0.7199216220179786,"score_gpt":0.746428607096397,"score_spread":0.02650698507841842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362524064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96892345,0.002169466,0.0011476376,0.020698063,0.00015051883,0.00041947328,0.005751404,0.00003721838,0.00070274714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765575,0.0017709947,0.00005639062,0.00033774407,0.00003986773,0.000004853279,0.000056967103,0.000004462915,0.00007295232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883905,0.0012941158,0.0016462052,0.00064159563,0.0070612463,0.00096634316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990506,0.0025122925,0.0016500294,0.0010582441,0.0019063962,0.0023670408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0405415,0.00018721198,0.0008018963,0.02754359,0.0005632199,0.0011389289,0.0015898561,0.000094997486,0.0002878644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02153039,0.000097524324,0.0005077908,0.3540389,0.00020545605,0.00042193086,0.00027866763,0.00015897339,0.000019799108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010497084,0.00012725733,0.45763433,0.000006310693,0.00013875327,9.602677e-7,0.00011923875,0.0013335553,0.0000014093854,0.0007502073,0.053053547,0.48672944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033000272,0.0016391458,0.95636255,0.0000054163424,0.000009193708,0.0000063336547,0.0004167686,0.0377556,5.4075497e-7,0.0023542715,0.0010457359,0.000074469644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020697393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019670331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4987282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002833158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055720946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362581830","doi":"10.3390/publications11020022","title":"Constraints on Research in Biological and Agricultural Science in Developing Countries: The Example of Latin America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latin Americans; Agriculture; Globe; Publication; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Economic growth; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.8358821980142553,"score_gpt":0.609083329223973,"score_spread":0.22679886879028233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362581830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97599125,0.00052842806,0.000099664176,0.017303538,0.000047398833,0.00036140755,0.00001919076,0.000013311797,0.0056358003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945201,0.0049977903,0.00028270972,0.000047791258,0.000006681014,0.000056111407,0.000003622604,0.0000015189254,0.00008363105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951954,0.0002918763,0.00043473407,0.00046237351,0.0031387836,0.00047685244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826736,0.01504675,0.000096774915,0.00041555343,0.0016509184,0.00011641515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029211748,0.000053497064,0.00014768678,0.038906638,0.00034720867,0.00089302246,0.0015867264,0.000038697955,0.00008283824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03649432,0.000026317846,0.000019351628,0.34575903,0.0022455987,0.000299389,0.00063316786,0.00021017929,0.00018208059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005046294,0.000107646585,0.40594652,0.000006545462,0.0000024903952,0.0000017588164,0.0013956074,0.000030755065,0.0003081262,0.22510804,0.0026649514,0.3644225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007075269,0.000025924228,0.93175197,0.000010657448,1.3439968e-7,9.781289e-7,0.0014074261,0.00046614237,0.000024779976,0.0029092291,0.063292965,0.0000390143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037224945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5258055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010788202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043595175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362719734","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102760","title":"Bibliometric analysis of endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism research in South Asia from (2012–2021): Comparison with five developed countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"China; Sri lanka; South asia; Geography; Socioeconomics; Ancient history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.6687499453780853,"score_gpt":0.6189256305916963,"score_spread":0.049824314786389046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362719734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106202,0.1858912,0.00002211742,0.0007125825,0.00030756326,0.0016954427,0.00039587409,0.000037905964,0.00031711598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87825096,0.11913095,0.00097007275,0.00007467403,0.00012744636,0.00048294745,0.00010737636,0.000055502347,0.00080008473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93769115,0.021422379,0.007273138,0.004092873,0.02414569,0.005374779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8259675,0.15206957,0.0016978702,0.0045745904,0.01330969,0.0023808053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27443117,0.00065389735,0.0066389306,0.70799327,0.00064950035,0.0023890405,0.006294115,0.000582001,0.0013809494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2459385,0.00042495408,0.00088352925,0.92365867,0.0043482278,0.0012343549,0.0046826345,0.0034440786,0.0019283751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049081063,0.0003066682,0.7537871,0.000047476446,0.0007688802,0.000047144178,0.0003084167,0.000016658618,0.00005412559,0.00031445193,0.0036565962,0.2406434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010251214,0.00037673974,0.82687736,0.00013946793,0.0002637389,7.4638905e-7,0.0007953393,0.0030417794,0.00014329156,0.0017504314,0.1652094,0.0003765932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046619403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000284369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2402668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012602514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010552969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4364357130","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2023.03.001","title":"Changements au bureau de rédaction du JOGC","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.20965244034409364,"score_gpt":0.4560624957645187,"score_spread":0.24641005542042504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4364357130","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043498546,0.009137476,0.00024964265,0.0024332001,0.942855,0.000215329,0.00027398125,0.0000062200384,0.0013305896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5400949,0.05945998,0.0015939554,0.0009230697,0.35186526,0.00003810906,0.00012851901,0.0002939887,0.045602165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825529,0.00069831766,0.0021467172,0.0007529937,0.012135826,0.0017132724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8533216,0.12884161,0.0030966687,0.0005785612,0.011992536,0.002169014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021352032,0.00047775393,0.0013118567,0.0477148,0.0007668339,0.001452234,0.0026943507,0.0013003437,0.0012019571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49654064,0.00039190997,0.00032397546,0.085764244,0.00032802508,0.0005347275,0.00093616603,0.0023166272,0.000045697605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008040058,0.00011122154,0.046584785,0.000051361338,0.00019990838,0.0036252853,0.00012021618,0.000092842594,0.0000038327453,0.000066041845,0.70346206,0.2456744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016124118,0.00081459293,0.13616475,0.000019548634,0.00012624428,0.000041437954,0.0005562539,0.0009084073,0.000008573452,0.0010066165,0.8584086,0.00033257095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23183863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18202089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59098977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01962635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02858405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366254145","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102714","title":"Universal research index: An inclusive metric to quantify scientific research output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; McGill University; Krembil Foundation; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Toronto Western Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Metric (unit); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Disadvantage; Statistics; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Mathematics; Business; Marketing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8635694832816184,"score_gpt":0.6586222012123094,"score_spread":0.204947282069309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366254145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521487,0.0010890316,0.0014846859,0.03744654,0.002034461,0.00063570583,0.000033306227,0.000047580448,0.005080041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839227,0.0005249439,0.0002765352,0.00020585697,0.0009986975,0.000004415974,0.0000027091453,0.000040133516,0.014023967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93048084,0.013029949,0.0022948245,0.0011492936,0.05019634,0.0028487793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90559834,0.07002694,0.000778846,0.0024531714,0.018414611,0.002728094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42668134,0.00023521393,0.0005714404,0.25093636,0.0028981224,0.0060763326,0.020071652,0.00051046204,0.0003451921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19116697,0.00013678183,0.00022259564,0.58419365,0.0016954426,0.0047162753,0.006486565,0.0072826045,0.0028108677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009331298,0.0001848143,0.075583376,0.000014565559,0.00006937236,0.00024211677,0.0120853,0.0018112486,0.006797703,0.01885875,0.77676684,0.10665276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014408728,0.0021832304,0.32802686,0.00012443923,0.000022354025,0.00018498357,0.054686204,0.008813922,0.0039390004,0.29145703,0.30862412,0.0004969753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013056412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001318018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46814275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005038028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003467832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366658782","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4417249","title":"(Under)Representation of Research Journals from Africa in Web of Science, and Scopus","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Representation (politics); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer science; Library science; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Politics","score_opus":0.6148023250811404,"score_gpt":0.6161436134869189,"score_spread":0.001341288405778518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366658782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897354,0.0060381927,0.00047550618,0.0011594972,0.00018270429,0.00013851584,0.000010564789,0.000005618937,0.0022539494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804354,0.018852143,0.000104233186,0.000004348502,0.00006170555,0.000002373653,5.465805e-7,0.000007267051,0.0005320398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97668463,0.0007020981,0.0010985321,0.000532102,0.018185442,0.002797222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98539084,0.0056141135,0.0004413329,0.00043571816,0.007817374,0.00030063392],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17326817,0.00009245181,0.00035633013,0.13695012,0.0003905379,0.00094210875,0.0022996317,0.000082004175,0.00008490547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051311824,0.00006679687,0.00008636974,0.3953335,0.0012841002,0.0010369379,0.0006863438,0.0017215108,0.000039922288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023519514,0.0003537749,0.42564994,0.000011831229,0.0000821539,0.000038959424,0.0023175336,0.00041866922,0.1687228,0.061234765,0.0025624945,0.33837187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007835069,0.000341504,0.17358492,0.000058257418,0.0000030835045,0.00003751196,0.019283134,0.005200091,0.0035303396,0.7969161,0.00017760675,0.00008392662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028435115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040191863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73568135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006511209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009131245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99648607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366701044","doi":"10.54337/aau524581650","title":"Guide til AAU Forskningsindikator","year":2023,"lang":"da","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9161261546430498,"score_gpt":0.7079730066892186,"score_spread":0.20815314795383122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366701044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036488702,0.005866889,0.003836925,0.0025856409,0.02180047,0.0014123349,0.0007386421,0.00043212593,0.9596781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004434806,0.018674461,0.0018687951,0.00028184324,0.0016274281,0.000065753615,0.00014186568,0.00017994286,0.9727251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92319614,0.00046258757,0.004401804,0.0039913473,0.06459747,0.0033506388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494317,0.0179626,0.0021592404,0.004381463,0.02324664,0.0028183383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10730931,0.0010668855,0.0021479467,0.28638008,0.0011359653,0.014557297,0.01141333,0.001720638,0.021361746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23785815,0.0007473229,0.0015511812,0.55018836,0.0006913362,0.0010367722,0.0066515272,0.001947824,0.0905031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009109833,0.000107049105,0.010823264,0.000041678697,0.000080590165,0.00037819208,0.00004580567,0.000005568702,0.00002902838,0.0002973399,0.6621914,0.32599097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043269095,0.00030293112,0.0090051405,0.00012165303,0.00005264442,0.00009252355,0.00062115607,0.002026349,0.00017912143,0.0016760476,0.984522,0.0009677428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051348787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035163583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32502323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015341908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010666151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366776075","doi":"","title":"Panorama sur l’intégrité scientifique : d’hier à aujourd’hui","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.19421802143744496,"score_gpt":0.40440571266100195,"score_spread":0.210187691223557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366776075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41288516,0.016171582,0.18366912,0.09024799,0.0064903414,0.002686417,0.001011093,0.0005196126,0.28631866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5372107,0.0041989656,0.044248644,0.00037691687,0.0002427534,0.00018483888,0.0005697153,0.00019216035,0.4127753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94390094,0.027829183,0.0035800573,0.005256294,0.016310371,0.0031231276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87817085,0.023700079,0.002658042,0.010155915,0.08158513,0.0037299942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19549504,0.0013701954,0.0018513256,0.027841605,0.0020728216,0.017387835,0.015394604,0.0017012007,0.0044852616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15096109,0.0012913129,0.0012537867,0.095838964,0.002871486,0.0017114452,0.014556434,0.0035377296,0.004636755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007704302,0.0041674906,0.025692346,0.00031323198,0.00030056902,0.00013939514,0.01162509,0.00043903315,0.0036800357,0.18237385,0.1226843,0.6485076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024644886,0.000005188545,0.020920452,0.0029488853,0.0001391492,0.00010214962,0.0010271305,0.08600289,0.0266007,0.055055276,0.8023857,0.0023480256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008735384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037530917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014245504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005997578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366783310","doi":"10.1186/s41073-023-00128-2","title":"Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Scopus; Peer review; Psychology; Demography; Medicine; Actuarial science; Geography; Statistics; MEDLINE; Political science; Business; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.952932832349722,"score_gpt":0.7128552951760203,"score_spread":0.24007753717370173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366783310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008900476,0.45563105,0.01418203,0.4871189,0.0015437815,0.010934273,0.0070580426,0.00015732733,0.014474101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27519447,0.60402906,0.018777374,0.009009569,0.0006369592,0.0006736663,0.007404114,0.00020898547,0.08406579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388121,0.0055411663,0.0014558879,0.0018160795,0.05110046,0.0012743281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7242428,0.12653145,0.0011073444,0.012871005,0.13354589,0.0017015286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5547979,0.00021518701,0.0007798712,0.010945799,0.0010654031,0.0035327594,0.0065204636,0.00009799213,0.0006333195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63858366,0.00010254955,0.000114888164,0.19269064,0.0012004178,0.0005447088,0.0023484963,0.0021607645,0.0005419625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020875057,0.00009121836,0.0071694455,0.0025214362,0.000013243253,0.000009521886,0.000026165071,0.000029473898,0.000006837244,0.00018360357,0.691698,0.2982302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024597286,0.0002283798,0.031462498,0.0154436305,0.000021467285,0.000009838818,0.000074488285,0.06817354,0.000014715915,0.00070851773,0.883397,0.00021997251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006840166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030211522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47810936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000745736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012074243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885476},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367308548","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00378-6","title":"Differences in collaboration structures and impact among prominent researchers in Europe and North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EPJ Data Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Politics; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Network structure; Regional science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7026761929763207,"score_gpt":0.5976172621589622,"score_spread":0.10505893081735851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367308548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823827,0.00023630269,0.000025007404,0.00069000677,0.000086070824,0.00027479976,0.00019943478,0.000011672709,0.00023842028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984804,0.0010692695,0.00027030185,0.000017224076,0.000013135464,0.0000059751083,0.000022313612,0.0000037863092,0.00011762414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920694,0.0002533686,0.00039709103,0.0011495968,0.0054649184,0.0006656224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577916,0.0018596251,0.000118095275,0.0009284239,0.00090080255,0.00041389262],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018765748,0.00010916993,0.00021207669,0.030529356,0.00024089827,0.0038572035,0.0033209373,0.000032367177,0.000042585758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070168346,0.00006858769,0.000007777818,0.36307594,0.0015972886,0.0031324034,0.0033370003,0.00023483811,0.00002564244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009839652,0.000012169101,0.9524395,0.0000022409718,7.7021355e-7,0.0000188109,0.0005042848,0.00002279612,0.00067999266,0.000033737222,0.0012052734,0.04507057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015912275,0.00008741731,0.9399556,0.000005419381,3.9760639e-7,0.0000010636721,0.0010794952,0.05759397,0.00003493228,0.00038966956,0.00060794264,0.000084984065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011857349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021963243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33254656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007519998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006235932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322216","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0066","title":"Who is Publishing in Biomedical Predatory Journals? A Study on Chinese Scholars","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Misconduct; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5387497138985565,"score_gpt":0.5629177425169369,"score_spread":0.02416802861838041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622217,0.0010842714,0.00018825018,0.030107241,0.0023754511,0.0003104643,0.000041858322,0.000039820923,0.0036309436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957267,0.00023774352,0.00032111272,0.0014989092,0.0010114078,0.0000056420467,0.0000022468023,0.000039637474,0.0011565909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9436076,0.0020527872,0.0040545696,0.001110475,0.047687076,0.0014874911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649983,0.009916127,0.00245083,0.0013677373,0.019077055,0.0021899445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27564022,0.0003575288,0.0010303566,0.215598,0.0005998862,0.41802508,0.011789939,0.0005984516,0.0005024198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6091589,0.00023265283,0.00048532564,0.33289507,0.00014354134,0.26619807,0.0023719463,0.010185017,0.00030350714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008474617,0.00069341104,0.7460919,0.0000051804213,0.00006145326,0.00078621146,0.0021434047,0.000050495208,0.00039131084,0.000043655902,0.19635178,0.053296465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026800565,0.000826095,0.93627834,0.00016793041,0.000008700473,0.00010859203,0.007101155,0.00078460324,0.000022015472,0.008076262,0.043694712,0.000251548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008155908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018205597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33351862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066279684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012323802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355674},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367322283","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0045","title":"Review of Research on Predatory Scientific Publications from Scopus Database between 2012 and 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Web of science; The Internet; Library science; Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Political science; Publication; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8131554118121708,"score_gpt":0.6284540156426669,"score_spread":0.18470139616950387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82970214,0.12261345,0.00038691668,0.03970241,0.0018134635,0.0004755277,0.0011600469,0.000032695563,0.004113359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924759,0.08145828,0.0058094426,0.0014493926,0.0024634057,0.000030685795,0.00035566886,0.000085287145,0.015871922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96736133,0.0017272163,0.0020617861,0.00081757066,0.027283734,0.0007483803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92037183,0.02567669,0.0018424457,0.0022303408,0.0483283,0.0015504104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2889777,0.00012988143,0.0005204008,0.11199444,0.00077597064,0.091092095,0.0061916374,0.00017082531,0.0007306776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.418771,0.000091831316,0.00017066121,0.2670218,0.00045937783,0.087587625,0.0023403186,0.0030186127,0.00017513531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011099965,0.00007859224,0.107193165,0.00012809737,0.000030418632,0.000010234712,0.00007959977,0.0000014188212,0.0013939362,0.0007622455,0.82396597,0.06634523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054567715,0.00023546926,0.33763957,0.0027957577,0.000020060128,0.000011377874,0.0008889805,0.000104141014,0.000506813,0.012062686,0.64502907,0.00016040476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008387679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007809266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23044641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017391748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012830767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367680925","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0059","title":"Chief Statisticians as Second-to-Last Authors in Biomedical Papers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Computer science; Production (economics); Operations research; Data science; Management science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.3840685578789365,"score_gpt":0.5258084745558161,"score_spread":0.14173991667687963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367680925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95250034,0.00019597854,0.0014015697,0.026824428,0.0026660478,0.00014246888,0.00005861286,0.000026449678,0.016184082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114776,0.00007554838,0.0029065285,0.0013322311,0.0004520585,0.0000029446242,0.0000044384715,0.000021383064,0.004057105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764642,0.0005684573,0.0019147423,0.0005558418,0.019535251,0.0009615217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836611,0.0069510913,0.0007744365,0.0005002277,0.006186749,0.0019263905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10469224,0.00016398712,0.0004949216,0.14906532,0.00025990861,0.096735,0.005077118,0.00028303365,0.0016120672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43500608,0.000115575516,0.00019732854,0.2786518,0.00011328635,0.037277106,0.001007303,0.0027470735,0.00071145466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007432709,0.00021035963,0.2010535,0.000009756374,0.000043150376,0.0012893759,0.0016836328,0.00016349618,0.0065796776,0.002351625,0.45068833,0.33585277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078782643,0.00045951683,0.6371861,0.000057555117,0.000004593237,0.00009734879,0.0035297305,0.0005076846,0.00007200959,0.011711112,0.34540617,0.00018033263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008193159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011288033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4361326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032524767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009788243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368360813","doi":"10.1177/08445621231172621","title":"Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; CINAHL; MEDLINE; Health care; Grey literature; Scopus; Empirical research; Multidisciplinary approach; Scientific literature; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Psychological intervention; Biology","score_opus":0.9582995180482285,"score_gpt":0.7773683384431942,"score_spread":0.18093117960503435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368360813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007932847,0.9830613,0.000005871211,0.0056852647,0.0015892596,0.0024659343,0.000102329985,0.000008351009,0.0070737717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000626319,0.9977125,0.00008556345,0.0001172995,0.0006837561,0.000052945787,0.000015044393,0.000104733044,0.0011655275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9330321,0.018737216,0.0053755166,0.0016341337,0.036591046,0.004629992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.901505,0.055748384,0.0020691953,0.0029100182,0.030033275,0.007734115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40285283,0.0004283388,0.0034170642,0.383539,0.0014629222,0.014486265,0.012002132,0.00070381863,0.0003360909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32090995,0.00031706973,0.00080351083,0.41542244,0.0011598025,0.0016076991,0.00048753902,0.012599956,0.0008042057],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043045884,0.000033094708,0.000014466317,0.018661218,0.000010262755,0.00051667885,0.00040536976,0.0000033406045,8.316779e-9,0.00022489589,0.24585165,0.7342747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012368926,0.00038391977,0.00002582699,0.54715127,0.0000060151847,0.00008423325,0.0015585775,0.0000033341532,5.9533935e-8,0.0009416304,0.44956338,0.00015806496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044093514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087226955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7341167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018081998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10470248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4368364174","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0074","title":"WAAI: A Weighted Author Affiliation Index for Journal Evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Subject (documents); Publication; Index (typography); Journal ranking; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; World Wide Web; Citation; Law","score_opus":0.7034173796001133,"score_gpt":0.5923809843819302,"score_spread":0.11103639521818309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368364174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080787,0.0010314259,0.03487101,0.046168283,0.0063872836,0.000500469,0.000027947563,0.00003473176,0.0029002016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937577,0.0001362548,0.0054004956,0.00030768514,0.0020704332,0.000008988471,0.000008975945,0.000023401022,0.0026680056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96749145,0.00089590537,0.0021276418,0.00039853124,0.02838641,0.0007000435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91896856,0.0071770893,0.0026918347,0.0004518213,0.06979824,0.0009124814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28675333,0.00014802071,0.0003958282,0.0993847,0.0007606209,0.18882136,0.0038169706,0.00030856134,0.00035876446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46214324,0.000099894096,0.00041915145,0.1450966,0.00004682041,0.10486032,0.00039448336,0.0019757207,0.000093377195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011019437,0.00006873626,0.041542422,0.000004575122,0.000050388127,0.000015040999,0.00036421936,0.0002490286,0.0015981931,0.0003877488,0.3640154,0.59159404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041627213,0.0009207465,0.37207323,0.000095661315,0.000072713694,0.00026759435,0.0035836878,0.120253876,0.0007820976,0.14552665,0.35190704,0.00035399746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007296499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004714023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59124005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005950181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016366602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.910823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4371783741","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4435262","title":"Grade Concept Article 5: Addressing Intransitivity in a Network Meta-Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University Health Network; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7411568501808912,"score_gpt":0.5766564847254608,"score_spread":0.16450036545543034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4371783741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4231795,0.13765281,0.41586053,0.01857254,0.0023078525,0.0011985942,0.00021123367,0.0001634205,0.00085348915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062043,0.006084653,0.00039320468,0.00009145248,0.00038538582,0.00002464136,0.000012511938,0.00003295162,0.002354744],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97803307,0.0024196184,0.0018696791,0.0014503397,0.010493541,0.005733769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054193,0.0050873077,0.0009683902,0.0011682326,0.0017673809,0.00046674075],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12975265,0.00040919494,0.0021056617,0.06308778,0.00042276943,0.0049019693,0.0037688315,0.0004190788,0.00048970693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013017571,0.00028272677,0.0029176578,0.2464247,0.00020586856,0.0005058411,0.0016326816,0.009159864,0.00014496178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014995178,0.00075933756,0.07166127,0.000021596408,0.17362316,0.00056385645,0.0015681512,0.62511164,0.000097406046,0.027476193,0.0060095866,0.09295784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004488526,0.00011355448,0.019457418,0.0000133103795,0.01364707,0.0000524078,0.0009991167,0.03594815,0.000045066747,0.92858267,0.00021735483,0.00047502323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007444516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009295268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9011065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014904732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004137287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375949667","doi":"10.54900/bzt33-6b575","title":"Opening New Paths to Technology Transfer: Open Science, Intellectual Property, and Technology Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Intellectual property; Technology transfer; Open innovation; Open science; Engineering ethics; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6442639237692555,"score_gpt":0.5662192654737422,"score_spread":0.07804465829551321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375949667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5814554,0.001411247,0.24650449,0.11678741,0.003330855,0.009087976,0.00016929684,0.0011171172,0.040136214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91398144,0.0009868417,0.01277401,0.0004241274,0.00010348745,0.0003339152,0.0000064086016,0.00008912092,0.07130065],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824162,0.00015925546,0.001633381,0.0045498107,0.0093137,0.0019276429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884289,0.0022971616,0.00007920962,0.0029190506,0.0049085408,0.0013671747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030402075,0.00060696434,0.001358691,0.28591487,0.0008970641,0.014288138,0.03098488,0.0011418251,0.0014409901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06770287,0.00035818832,0.00015757786,0.4759626,0.0019634722,0.0008716237,0.03962404,0.002088432,0.0016368133],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078029116,0.00014358424,0.006227268,0.000023207713,0.000051931394,0.00007461545,0.0010639384,0.000079085694,0.0091172615,0.01096495,0.043836255,0.9283399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035317345,0.0038047943,0.003507268,0.0005289736,0.00008240503,0.00023924376,0.011652901,0.014160113,0.09372048,0.31795585,0.5469629,0.0038533115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012984127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005946668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028684322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047198073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377195858","doi":"10.1101/2023.05.18.541286","title":"Contrasting the open access dissemination of COVID-19 and SDG research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Open access publishing; Open science; Open access journal; Political science; Sustainable development; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sustainability; Publishing; Library science; Business; Computer science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Scopus","score_opus":0.6805566466641992,"score_gpt":0.6084941788058503,"score_spread":0.07206246785834891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377195858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97704774,0.0023557085,0.006133904,0.008831627,0.0015780284,0.0030472288,0.0007143487,0.00013663064,0.000154786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978667,0.00090905465,0.000551839,0.00010670932,0.00017403465,0.00022332191,2.2495124e-7,0.000053870925,0.000114237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98502976,0.0015133148,0.0012622717,0.0018835068,0.009347731,0.0009634256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582923,0.027548816,0.0009917552,0.0027613097,0.009444211,0.00096157525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10045361,0.00031710055,0.00069657527,0.03061936,0.00092732045,0.017034939,0.013815675,0.00041144466,0.00015672305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26922545,0.00021648171,0.0001244355,0.116088554,0.000827696,0.0010114808,0.024753908,0.0013701427,0.00006648907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022370227,0.000616183,0.63317907,0.0011398687,0.00034951666,0.00020967708,0.000280287,0.00036125127,0.22042036,0.017463895,0.1250887,0.0006674627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050430914,0.00010286805,0.94787246,0.00033554548,0.000031307754,3.034409e-8,0.00014135288,0.006723705,0.026360951,0.0008359376,0.016513694,0.0005778458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000963121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025390547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31469336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003808523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025383888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99152005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377237188","doi":"10.1515/9780228003106-007","title":"The Elusive Pursuit of Internationalization in Canadian Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Political science; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.3254953305572419,"score_gpt":0.44188473219927416,"score_spread":0.11638940164203226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377237188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003206416,0.000012925325,0.00004924869,0.0018835398,0.00025188882,0.00056610425,0.0006096482,0.000012461879,0.9965821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04466449,0.00046389076,0.0000394573,0.00006867989,0.000055113775,0.0000016494375,0.000023597104,0.000025459643,0.9546577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804224,0.00039570875,0.00060139643,0.0008396294,0.009428723,0.0006923017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886279,0.003923463,0.000381557,0.00082775636,0.005577199,0.0006621424],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009998709,0.00022283204,0.00039889629,0.037285004,0.0007229668,0.0007032489,0.005352487,0.0003681965,0.00014194907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006987374,0.00017959667,0.00019420766,0.006460306,0.0005826274,0.00021963436,0.0021829472,0.0009762269,0.00006884241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054212265,0.000008253407,0.00016240054,0.000008937439,0.00003880113,0.00013998432,0.00007866473,0.000027506907,0.0000050598373,0.974557,0.016512223,0.008406968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027734585,0.000076220735,0.00037592085,0.000045312707,0.000007971819,7.1466206e-7,0.00014745696,0.0003526033,0.000100930374,0.015163075,0.9832817,0.00017077483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15420927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003999766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96676946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013012616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009288547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99463415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377825501","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2023-004460","title":"Evaluating open access publication and research impact in gynecologic oncology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecologic oncology; Gynecologic cancer; Odds ratio; Internal medicine; Oncology; Impact factor; Citation; Gynecology; Cancer; Library science; Ovarian cancer","score_opus":0.9559723428180329,"score_gpt":0.8286021912471291,"score_spread":0.1273701515709038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377825501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96848714,0.00035363657,0.0000460011,0.02472294,0.0010870899,0.0002919914,0.000019330033,0.0000072026205,0.004984665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966768,0.0015035814,0.00036603375,0.00042789878,0.00019705977,0.000052217165,0.0000031340553,0.000005623843,0.00076762174],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883739,0.0013212807,0.0012159406,0.00048020354,0.008060468,0.00054824166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571442,0.025827967,0.0007588042,0.00023142438,0.015683495,0.00035411192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.089982666,0.00010237777,0.0003933907,0.03639208,0.00015111554,0.0061254995,0.008504366,0.00017659817,0.005882241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23237438,0.00006041716,0.00010851107,0.061438072,0.00023200877,0.002389666,0.0053714896,0.00077651284,0.0001265961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017397178,0.00017988287,0.41920432,9.78672e-7,0.000031649117,0.00014426226,0.000091520036,0.0009007057,0.00060988776,0.0005125798,0.03140881,0.5467414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010451732,0.00093971886,0.93069166,0.0000107264805,0.0000021542367,0.000027167798,0.0002259181,0.0073382515,0.000081492515,0.039838377,0.019723268,0.00007609778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036496145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025705918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015020232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014906725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378575846","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16780","title":"An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Popularity; Science Citation Index; Web of science; Guideline; MEDLINE; Citation analysis; Citation; Medicine; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7839664267245572,"score_gpt":0.6837513455007528,"score_spread":0.1002150812238044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378575846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638405,0.010846711,0.00016315238,0.024230966,0.00022185309,0.0004922597,0.000048076967,0.000023468654,0.00013301476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044293,0.0069863396,0.00083032006,0.0014171122,0.00006695947,0.000014839427,0.000060765266,0.000010631296,0.00017012547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98604095,0.0011416485,0.0029616298,0.000997107,0.0083514275,0.0005072426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686101,0.020861227,0.004511114,0.0013115725,0.0043258197,0.00038016192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07989248,0.00017429404,0.00088777917,0.59066236,0.0002248542,0.00058131426,0.0012277873,0.00009217766,0.00019151355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47372714,0.00009143368,0.00011540592,0.90217745,0.0001263222,0.0003646476,0.00024935626,0.0002500886,0.000041562264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008920424,0.00018642965,0.8904266,0.000038866045,0.00016544247,0.000046266254,0.0022808486,0.002706193,0.0009120622,0.000030875977,0.011618062,0.09149917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046414812,0.00079002714,0.9217253,0.00016117518,0.000054412885,5.5755714e-7,0.009658435,0.06543336,0.00007082332,0.0002443499,0.0012770761,0.00012034133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024701273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004608765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39383465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007827465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027748488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379054549","doi":"10.1111/joes.12571","title":"Thirty years of academic finance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of California, Los Angeles; Peking University; Università Bocconi; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Tsinghua University; University of Melbourne; University of Sydney; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Manchester; Nanyang Technological University; National University of Singapore; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of New South Wales; Institut de Valorisation des Données; York University; University of Pennsylvania; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.6134253014497257,"score_gpt":0.5668620003421732,"score_spread":0.04656330110755258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379054549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99619263,0.00040973266,0.00032303424,0.00038706645,0.0014103554,0.000040531395,0.000028230521,0.0000040914942,0.0012043468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962094,0.0015929335,0.00016603657,0.00002114704,0.00013997634,3.9160304e-7,5.0876923e-7,0.000006303934,0.0018633117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954072,0.0005709805,0.0013470559,0.00022056288,0.0021400228,0.0003141656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902527,0.007355928,0.0010631075,0.00032891327,0.00084400165,0.00015538243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09919772,0.000066755885,0.0003905477,0.029338673,0.00003795721,0.00019432075,0.0020144198,0.0000987822,0.000391739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02282423,0.000051210754,0.00021596978,0.037729405,0.00010372364,0.00053533574,0.00029215327,0.00034828082,0.0009627951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016321606,0.000025106745,0.5510638,0.0000025007018,0.00002814785,0.000028485108,0.00014637841,0.0016448447,0.0005155048,0.0003732809,0.08945923,0.35669643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029610365,0.00010265914,0.96715826,0.00000763937,0.0000020057525,0.0000131022325,0.0001003342,0.0018380242,0.0004120516,0.009050875,0.020956645,0.000062303414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029489624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008210093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4160945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009377931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003762757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379057187","doi":"10.3822/ijtmb.v16i2.849","title":"How Should We Recognize the Important Role of the Peer Reviewer?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Loyalist College","funders":"","keywords":"Bodywork; Peer review; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.5736884125290285,"score_gpt":0.6400948181856465,"score_spread":0.06640640565661804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379057187","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014101903,0.03136291,0.00017151152,0.26349062,0.7007744,0.0006961002,0.000117297786,0.000009726128,0.003236453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019664122,0.14964846,0.0010046697,0.0009678355,0.71318,0.00015084776,0.000048833568,0.00017566598,0.11515955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9158821,0.006122538,0.002658906,0.0007767565,0.07374303,0.0008166421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35015422,0.28325665,0.013873971,0.0045599006,0.3471698,0.0009854491],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19478972,0.00037657376,0.00077318546,0.019031692,0.0005553454,0.007918425,0.016678492,0.00063113146,0.0006606576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.72735876,0.0001869873,0.0009295819,0.05212068,0.0006426648,0.0017873378,0.0019388632,0.0063245874,0.0001648164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002651225,0.0003978165,0.0004036938,0.000016100714,0.00043133038,0.000013788103,0.00037917696,0.000004261722,0.00016271377,0.0005009032,0.80960155,0.18782355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029083242,0.00017648995,0.0006205337,0.0003730825,0.0001026674,0.000036501067,0.006860661,0.00007965439,0.00010006356,0.02588875,0.9652962,0.00017454052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024517367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041042014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5657279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009457368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011733711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99596786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379230918","doi":"10.3390/publications11020032","title":"Roles and Responsibilities for Peer Reviewers of International Journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Peer review; Consistency (knowledge bases); Technical peer review; Reading (process); Peer feedback; Public relations; Advice (programming); Narrative review; Medical education; Narrative; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.8011725688322632,"score_gpt":0.6687242451278416,"score_spread":0.1324483237044216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379230918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5641463,0.00591114,0.014193724,0.37800798,0.0012356307,0.0011081239,0.0010961967,0.00012024955,0.034180667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958789,0.0036303452,0.005595758,0.00020827635,0.00014654384,0.00016297128,0.000050628714,0.000011304254,0.09431525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950575,0.000078688274,0.00048067662,0.0002550765,0.0039489917,0.00017902913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809864,0.0069345282,0.00020779959,0.00042992353,0.011288441,0.00015290453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03158849,0.000042982876,0.00012746522,0.0335977,0.0001384487,0.0010980177,0.000991898,0.000033348395,0.00037219108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23037949,0.000030450969,0.00007692989,0.066815175,0.00011217352,0.0004993261,0.0002634764,0.000058727474,0.000057935013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135499295,0.000052636206,0.13400541,0.000009025004,0.000022857246,1.2992405e-7,0.00035135075,0.000012325017,0.0007703581,0.048065197,0.6540093,0.1626879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116306524,0.000018554441,0.29133195,0.0000048033535,0.0000021644357,0.0000013407009,0.00064301596,0.0020835355,0.00014365351,0.027915718,0.6777006,0.000038402428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004791222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049329656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37779972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020780686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012159865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379364963","doi":"10.1002/asi.24758","title":"A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Prairie and Pacific University Libraries; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Directory; Library science; Citation; Bibliometrics; World Wide Web; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.28533283705545054,"score_gpt":0.536237433066305,"score_spread":0.25090459601085446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379364963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972012,0.00004301766,0.000026777769,0.0014185997,0.00023109077,0.00029564416,0.00001796197,0.000001968682,0.0007637553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998111,0.000082287595,0.000042444568,0.000015191428,0.00000414487,0.000002215195,3.632737e-8,7.9705285e-7,0.00004176566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920731,0.00007773766,0.0012167448,0.00010592225,0.006293956,0.00023249432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843748,0.0012741241,0.0032394358,0.00024278711,0.010815318,0.00005349106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04947075,0.000053283635,0.00031891782,0.03845652,0.0003966199,0.00037365788,0.002044581,0.000059360354,0.0000021285502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055764697,0.000026755806,0.000051665404,0.18819375,0.0014406062,0.0022447044,0.00068144675,0.00019951239,6.576706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029977215,0.000115017276,0.965319,0.0000079594565,0.0000150061405,1.0362247e-7,0.005175968,0.00029777482,0.010932993,0.0032833884,0.00056850776,0.014254318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011263799,0.0004335156,0.94875145,0.00003057155,0.000007590939,0.0000060180973,0.022925429,0.0037460744,0.012902012,0.0089925565,0.0010343724,0.00004403226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011209703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020974448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14973724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016990052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787699},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379469623","doi":"10.1186/s12961-023-01001-w","title":"Exploring the merits of research performance measures that comply with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment and strategies to overcome barriers of adoption: qualitative interviews with administrators and researchers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Stem Cell Network; Toronto General Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"University Health Network","keywords":"Health services research; Declaration; Qualitative research; Health administration; Public health; Medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.9728135525667861,"score_gpt":0.7340543094144618,"score_spread":0.23875924315232433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379469623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751277,0.0015784133,0.00021149835,0.019428313,0.00005437795,0.002273918,0.00006206163,0.000012704305,0.0012509925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941601,0.004743083,0.00007735103,0.000048565737,0.00009156902,0.0005281037,0.0000025499041,0.000020845795,0.00032781682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95109844,0.02012626,0.0010412143,0.0010346059,0.024727706,0.0019717673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530776,0.03661089,0.00024853263,0.0010816638,0.0077651693,0.0012161384],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28766412,0.00020476982,0.000591325,0.026037727,0.0027059668,0.002435514,0.0014414896,0.000085649364,0.000008047164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016005766,0.00009617362,0.000033680117,0.08402527,0.0036738254,0.00085025205,0.0008604138,0.0017770377,0.000009004077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048364974,0.00035480512,0.09438065,0.004902076,0.0003352387,0.00004710392,0.47600707,0.00087356253,0.0020914811,0.24158241,0.02933641,0.14525269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070131134,0.010225925,0.30984518,0.00093569845,0.0000020622665,0.000015661994,0.6642374,0.0024814445,0.00030255254,0.0010809574,0.010001235,0.00017060469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070361374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013020887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27165836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003602527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003813445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380150010","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.1557","title":"MSR21 Impact of Correlated Outcomes in Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses When Treatment Effects Are Derived from a Network Meta-Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"EVERSANA (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Econometrics; Probabilistic logic; Sensitivity (control systems); Regression; Meta-regression; Correlation; Regression analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.8169312145311791,"score_gpt":0.6222054501852085,"score_spread":0.19472576434597066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380150010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949395,0.0024051378,0.0006657197,0.00074153283,0.00013537273,0.00081771903,0.00024497384,0.00003009552,0.000019958983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988569,0.000241552,0.0006371689,0.000044161363,0.000015665204,0.000040648796,0.00003296096,0.000011547477,0.00011937213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98831755,0.004279966,0.0015852775,0.0009770476,0.003913506,0.00092662516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607709,0.036395635,0.0007949861,0.0010136749,0.00061525806,0.00040951962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023489887,0.0002779617,0.0028071548,0.05016882,0.00011076492,0.00030574514,0.0005957318,0.00013388881,0.00018774832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028563483,0.00015894359,0.0015222502,0.25833273,0.00009402051,0.00018081213,0.00026588532,0.00023942637,0.0000716926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024151628,0.00021077953,0.5946194,0.000008785345,0.004694311,0.0000644961,0.00033221702,0.39856616,0.000029773026,0.0000056373137,0.0001571842,0.0012871017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003944056,0.00024496618,0.71212494,0.000008100429,0.0012747728,3.476837e-7,0.00006439638,0.28252068,0.000021683894,0.0032454128,0.000004531525,0.000095736905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14168762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007673277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20816392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086297153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005809473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9796193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380364391","doi":"10.3176/earth.2023.56","title":"Ordovician scientometrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences Geology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ordovician; Scientometrics; Paleontology; Geology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5186620442457053,"score_gpt":0.5528916263581309,"score_spread":0.03422958211242566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380364391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661598,0.00027958435,0.000015764745,0.013142963,0.000434382,0.00026812856,0.0000111230665,0.000041568306,0.019646654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949108,0.00016469811,0.0010527688,0.00027434592,0.000058334288,0.0000057549664,1.0360748e-7,0.00000793835,0.0035252958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862663,0.00005595732,0.0011457996,0.00094877294,0.010534666,0.0010484974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356526,0.0028305799,0.0011513393,0.00019136934,0.00195961,0.00030182098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042427246,0.00018115237,0.0005106112,0.070001386,0.0005756867,0.0004118583,0.010776695,0.00024402328,0.0001391794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047562882,0.00010499151,0.00025708464,0.46512,0.0050317035,0.0008231851,0.0030768614,0.00045265508,0.000290216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109348275,0.00006519198,0.8734533,0.000021285017,0.000010617019,2.3084588e-7,0.00036518878,0.000121958,0.016112538,0.06856273,0.012275656,0.029000325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002493371,0.00021188405,0.86546236,0.000019680816,0.000007646155,0.000012610932,0.00087745144,0.0063000643,0.018912602,0.09181129,0.01596008,0.00017501193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037281345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016914589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39511862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005375551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019267686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997676},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4380786331","doi":"10.18438/eblip30206","title":"Factors Affecting Publication Impact and Citation Trends Over Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Research Libraries; Institute of Museum and Library Services","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Scopus; Citation impact; Library science; Bibliometrics; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3470391982219514,"score_gpt":0.5219199714307318,"score_spread":0.17488077320878037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380786331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9331645,0.0003347572,0.0012643628,0.057088684,0.00013830171,0.00024377764,0.000034050307,0.00021462422,0.0075169364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992465,0.00058325514,0.00054145535,0.004699236,0.000043661676,0.000008092962,0.00015076912,0.0000072588027,0.0015012776],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605393,0.0003682959,0.00052319316,0.00026549544,0.0025249969,0.000264104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976205,0.022145804,0.00049962645,0.00029947833,0.00057104666,0.00027907733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010231312,0.00011891934,0.00013886292,0.028812055,0.00032675776,0.0074621732,0.00039658317,0.00008556703,0.0013239328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087207064,0.000080425045,0.000053477863,0.08986281,0.00005972518,0.29826924,0.00022334419,0.00018120595,0.00036446683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002481719,0.00005995933,0.14296927,0.000044117623,0.000031485648,0.000003939638,0.0011563156,0.0003454149,0.0005299878,0.010641128,0.17179368,0.67217654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019587898,0.00015412513,0.83160514,0.00002022154,0.000006024918,0.0000045502507,0.00053106726,0.06343394,0.00034783865,0.00022243368,0.10336044,0.00011835215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007704346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4595173e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6886359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019950538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013878354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381252825","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.09911","title":"Uncited articles and their effect on the concentration of citations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; CLARITY; Discipline; Distribution (mathematics); Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.7628013580059617,"score_gpt":0.5888631677423554,"score_spread":0.17393819026360635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381252825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98667437,0.00014506346,0.00578271,0.0033430455,0.00033822813,0.0004831734,0.00006972747,0.00002627894,0.0031374297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986361,0.000090148846,0.000085895976,0.00008020047,0.000023753262,0.000024343444,0.000006032322,0.0000058128667,0.0010476668],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496067,0.00046807213,0.00045487707,0.00046180745,0.0034450016,0.00020958223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652829,0.032264635,0.00021521623,0.00066138076,0.0014691994,0.00010662771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019415194,0.0001154098,0.0002369507,0.014316693,0.00013602247,0.0013317219,0.0010151702,0.000105642095,0.00019119555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04791784,0.000047831178,0.00010460596,0.06763105,0.00020579413,0.00007332332,0.00085693074,0.0002750527,0.00011499119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011530518,0.00026625316,0.21885073,0.0000811982,0.00021266869,0.000005938988,0.0024499649,0.0029349688,0.014817148,0.07695546,0.09012571,0.59318465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050650915,0.0007383743,0.42748398,0.000081920356,0.000015636288,0.000001028603,0.0021140536,0.22182395,0.054383855,0.29129505,0.0012555866,0.00030005822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102470185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026539188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5928846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027941265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009738122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382359902","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_27","title":"Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Collaborative bioethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Federatie van Universitair Medische Centra; VSNU Vereniging van Universiteiten; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Scrutiny; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Sustainability; Narrative; Political science; Competition (biology); Work (physics); Management science; Public relations; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.9734157568319641,"score_gpt":0.7977039594585251,"score_spread":0.175711797373439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382359902","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005131655,0.98412514,0.000028656157,0.002356787,0.0005845267,0.006026485,0.0005587712,0.000045137647,0.0062232087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000011738372,0.9830943,0.005652953,0.000083837804,0.00013109417,0.0007026461,0.00008587657,0.00009383085,0.010143736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8983294,0.045477398,0.005431776,0.0042157685,0.04391843,0.0026272242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55839396,0.26268727,0.008695489,0.0040383535,0.16433038,0.0018545571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4003516,0.00079630635,0.0040937643,0.095792875,0.0020467094,0.004440422,0.0058794073,0.0016139525,0.000167234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63740504,0.00055195036,0.00036762716,0.51568973,0.0042840284,0.0013502842,0.0065172124,0.0076388875,0.00032972347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012853763,0.0002983931,0.00007331744,0.055331234,0.00047753184,0.00016661511,0.0023958264,9.33359e-8,0.000010965457,0.0016749527,0.07802749,0.861415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029122867,0.00068578235,0.00004999815,0.108633794,0.00009491712,0.00001524454,0.008367966,0.000018202341,0.000036605674,0.0027463157,0.87852234,0.0005375857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020553767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019264195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86087745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013433177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041716818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383377022","doi":"10.1515/9780773556119-030","title":"Milestones in the Development of Science in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.2164267760325588,"score_gpt":0.3772339689302712,"score_spread":0.16080719289771242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383377022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007433558,0.0000053937297,0.000018619148,0.00010576175,0.00034645703,0.00052662246,0.00014721793,0.000005507691,0.99141085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28517678,0.00005711262,0.00035558746,0.00006706291,0.000010525731,9.960683e-7,0.0000039535707,0.000015196906,0.7143128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885676,0.00013311526,0.00072466314,0.00090803957,0.009051419,0.00061518716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949972,0.0019355958,0.00045548577,0.0010545899,0.0013579814,0.00019913088],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008005374,0.00026491762,0.00053539424,0.03302819,0.0003306344,0.00019103572,0.005973468,0.00016846579,0.00006247304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010430599,0.0001955534,0.000097667835,0.008211996,0.0006219014,0.0002438136,0.001875022,0.0005881414,0.0000151082495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016276931,0.00011582043,0.008314942,0.00011065659,0.00004959566,0.00064303505,0.0018521346,0.00031148593,0.000078083496,0.9010252,0.0064002355,0.080936044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042433233,0.000031466163,0.01221679,0.00008460366,0.0000063885386,0.0000012814736,0.0010230362,0.00008462004,0.00039263192,0.00057201297,0.98485065,0.00031220302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3861509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040479973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017694827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057853637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383458632","doi":"10.1515/9780773571594-022","title":"The More Thou Searchest, the More Thou Shalt Marvel: The Role of Canadian Science","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thou; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18719993304544555,"score_gpt":0.3850501530651588,"score_spread":0.19785022001971322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383458632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022740854,0.00009624484,0.000019429599,0.004658633,0.0003417053,0.0011286031,0.0010125069,0.00004028483,0.9924752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09325216,0.0012259367,0.00011619055,0.00031209498,0.000118708835,0.000004817106,0.000007878416,0.000060154067,0.90490204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841926,0.00033007053,0.00068491255,0.0013810355,0.011902775,0.0015085941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98559606,0.004888395,0.00068021007,0.0032352854,0.004560981,0.0010390612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014944097,0.0005231114,0.0005777786,0.02915048,0.005355352,0.0018515468,0.015154699,0.0004291736,0.00012420442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039736405,0.00026800402,0.00051482127,0.016060164,0.0061153937,0.00043825808,0.00424888,0.0016369667,0.000053344877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050324772,0.00001675872,0.00012990892,0.000009555204,0.00007848881,0.00008986112,0.00042962903,0.00009536547,0.000020748888,0.95648426,0.004009176,0.038585935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026254286,0.00007140063,0.0010980541,0.000050174956,0.00004768869,0.000007040137,0.001592823,0.00027361047,0.0005901551,0.012940867,0.98272353,0.00034212062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12021037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010356469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97871435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010930514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026455447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383748228","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2023.1448","title":"Sub-Saharan Africa's biomedical journal coverage in scholarly databases: a comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Directory; MEDLINE; Web of science; Library science; Bibliometrics; Online database; Medicine; Index (typography); Database; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.255144196718167,"score_gpt":0.49292451794027803,"score_spread":0.237780321222111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383748228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96259,0.0035133024,0.00036913733,0.030517362,0.0018211916,0.00020945641,0.0003067655,0.000012243303,0.0006605879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353844,0.00504961,0.00044458156,0.00019773714,0.0004709326,0.0000011100443,0.0000068439267,0.000017702065,0.0002730541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582735,0.0017923672,0.004145849,0.00042320474,0.03451002,0.0008550947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750234,0.01209476,0.0063256,0.000626407,0.0038355903,0.002094255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.088938385,0.0002335893,0.0012680689,0.045319904,0.00039444555,0.001544951,0.0052727987,0.00028436276,0.0005257636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23748252,0.0001325091,0.00037949573,0.15663664,0.0013131564,0.004958331,0.0017457933,0.0026397207,0.0000072223584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021081963,0.0011898717,0.8222051,0.00002819069,0.00011545523,0.00012614559,0.00083745975,0.00005938674,0.0028261675,0.000106956686,0.12428898,0.04800541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046968744,0.0007455105,0.8996016,0.0008950612,0.00006138558,0.00017247263,0.0050937305,0.020017883,0.0016255194,0.005097924,0.061692584,0.000299472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021988248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017277416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14854413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031522376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006316427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383823903","doi":"10.14293/s2199-ssp-am23-01018","title":"Correlations in APC, IF, and Publication Output from Authors in Lower Income Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Impact factor; Equity (law); Net income; Business; Library science; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Computer science; Accounting; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.44460632682092166,"score_gpt":0.5434239928255709,"score_spread":0.0988176660046492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383823903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98170394,0.0001308071,0.0010279653,0.008133004,0.00045565792,0.00020172707,0.000043935608,0.00004492051,0.008258072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98716307,0.0001523301,0.00026101203,0.000118802076,0.00002206589,0.000017117532,0.000014505809,0.0000052295277,0.012245859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948484,0.00014461827,0.00061845215,0.0005383269,0.0034789573,0.0003712729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274147,0.0056398907,0.000096993674,0.00042735593,0.000893409,0.00020087154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013572845,0.00008495226,0.00018845261,0.07816216,0.00010401379,0.0019969128,0.0007729585,0.00012575409,0.0009204766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03197359,0.000062088344,0.000030907242,0.22696121,0.00011261991,0.0009132486,0.00049895456,0.0002192866,0.0015813399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061828778,0.000022669063,0.9719212,7.600252e-7,0.0000014147773,0.0000058709093,0.00020842698,0.000064681415,0.0000070158553,0.0028163085,0.014463302,0.010482188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002689848,0.000018861609,0.9187739,0.00000493835,5.3475776e-7,3.3577925e-7,0.00025053124,0.046144538,0.000008462227,0.014037825,0.020413565,0.00007754642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011810795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085888273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14879905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009150689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011973313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383989145","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0287660","title":"Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Training (meteorology); Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.8914307221644698,"score_gpt":0.6262767588437951,"score_spread":0.26515396332067476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383989145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951756,0.00043614654,0.000039265517,0.00034546066,0.0001179696,0.00012467793,0.00014476408,0.000012544847,0.0036035655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306226,0.0011697958,0.00027470317,0.000028210674,0.00004278148,0.00001129852,0.00006727241,0.0000048171337,0.0053388583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285835,0.00020848478,0.0005371993,0.00036344124,0.005834472,0.00019802377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003035,0.0036196948,0.00011305651,0.00024837634,0.005862557,0.00012596266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033893656,0.000055045162,0.00019556898,0.022597227,0.000070162285,0.0004043496,0.0007751677,0.00004634688,0.00041429108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12086967,0.000044785553,0.000030756055,0.08491015,0.000098348064,0.0005245049,0.00027438343,0.00013844672,0.00011474643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004555239,0.00025163052,0.9942374,0.000014916656,0.000011499987,7.973832e-7,0.00016098098,0.0000060963366,0.00045360374,0.00018291314,0.000740736,0.003934845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016115243,0.000031977706,0.9929973,0.000043725075,9.629034e-7,4.2256693e-7,0.000036704776,0.005040571,0.0001197959,0.00097041525,0.0005495581,0.000047434824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004310798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008188765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086976014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036117613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012996275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384010727","doi":"10.1017/9781009401968.016","title":"Weak interactions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.4934816792221459,"score_gpt":0.4529067373471592,"score_spread":0.040574941874986725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384010727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007551537,0.00007101186,0.0007808684,0.000102977,0.0014691086,0.00030113306,0.0005624896,0.00016205873,0.99647486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007161443,0.00022904744,0.00006834129,0.00003497803,0.0001775939,6.688603e-7,0.000025238574,0.000044619643,0.99870336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238193,0.00009254985,0.00047016636,0.0011094785,0.005410855,0.00053502433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924101,0.002792768,0.00040909968,0.0013806658,0.0024510026,0.0005563631],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031094246,0.00032225077,0.0005093947,0.042892635,0.00042785506,0.0011862199,0.0034607854,0.00034151002,0.00011088648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023260047,0.0003019153,0.00048317533,0.003947981,0.00033905238,0.00030008392,0.002537946,0.0009055002,0.0020267048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018482122,0.0000071103436,0.000010753812,0.000005047633,0.000046951223,0.00015925545,0.000008475147,0.000002057906,0.000016712607,0.5622619,0.4250039,0.01245937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023680928,0.00004261592,0.00016921533,0.000035321103,0.000035830453,0.00001050497,0.000081508944,0.00031617,0.000052211748,0.00024603916,0.99845344,0.0003203136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015903734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009665023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57344955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032853594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026555866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384198044","doi":"10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2","title":"The future of academic publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; The Quebec Population Health Research Network","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Data science; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.44298287936265907,"score_gpt":0.5871568274627865,"score_spread":0.14417394810012746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384198044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98180884,0.0046792426,0.000010244376,0.0066067073,0.002080839,0.00019022908,0.00004590352,0.00007390824,0.004504114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934436,0.00037516042,0.000032907177,0.00011563682,0.0005135237,0.000008469867,0.000012578334,0.000012887345,0.009584472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875123,0.00020561475,0.00067405525,0.00052100356,0.01045665,0.0006303593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275434,0.003001768,0.00033420438,0.0009515574,0.0027054485,0.0002527098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029754004,0.00012600324,0.00022084499,0.026477674,0.0007796359,0.003462687,0.005393086,0.0006873894,0.0001965809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01911419,0.00006746117,0.00018796117,0.16902639,0.00019200957,0.0010247701,0.0010383774,0.0026819438,0.00019892275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006337893,0.000021413593,0.32730937,0.00000197862,0.0000057777497,0.000012616787,0.000119679,0.000002499154,0.0011941966,0.023169111,0.53144914,0.11670789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019736325,0.000039087052,0.8103431,0.0000053051926,0.000004439359,0.0000030864085,0.0010393967,0.00006490206,0.0005488246,0.02121579,0.16644037,0.00009834795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002016517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044781653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48303372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055464327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114107715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384213045","doi":"10.1515/9780773556102-030","title":"Les grandes étapes du développement des sciences au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Materials science","score_opus":0.28925944252305946,"score_gpt":0.394887656668815,"score_spread":0.10562821414575552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384213045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005391657,0.00004659263,0.00054027274,0.0012212336,0.001712266,0.0008934211,0.0012629231,0.00006168477,0.98886997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28146657,0.0018247961,0.0011885423,0.00013663573,0.00013379277,0.0000016835577,0.000016238551,0.000050265877,0.71518147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837686,0.0004933254,0.0009512687,0.002247149,0.010666028,0.0018736685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888241,0.004463293,0.0008210213,0.0011870163,0.003541269,0.001163281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060672476,0.0009193517,0.0011512124,0.023255901,0.005986747,0.0013293464,0.006060556,0.0006362433,0.00096877466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019014102,0.0008214337,0.00053214194,0.0068305805,0.0048227115,0.0007194261,0.0040440075,0.0009275594,0.000110736044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010741216,0.00007135569,0.010860412,0.00014260829,0.00022471226,0.0003534849,0.00014554724,0.00033871265,0.000014944624,0.91273814,0.0040588495,0.0709438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009624119,0.00038853663,0.007316624,0.00027476944,0.000121140234,0.0000109774455,0.00059672643,0.00029586026,0.0005315892,0.0018412387,0.9866285,0.0010316411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85181326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032924566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98256963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004601389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048362627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385197718","doi":"10.7202/1101727ar","title":"Mesure de la proportion de publication en libre accès au Canada, un portrait national","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Political science; Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.1660166282376448,"score_gpt":0.5226730294955413,"score_spread":0.3566564012578965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385197718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6952798,0.0068102777,0.022886025,0.15872931,0.0030477804,0.0015559153,0.0011805657,0.00045948318,0.11005089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94854444,0.0076313224,0.0025881312,0.002083684,0.00046971315,0.000119703334,0.0004931008,0.000040352545,0.03802952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98493063,0.002129424,0.0010751284,0.0008422972,0.009930839,0.0010916631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98727864,0.0067732013,0.00057245314,0.0003909072,0.0043148953,0.0006699173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045207366,0.00027214293,0.0002829137,0.08591804,0.0004833382,0.02054335,0.0014740343,0.0003597085,0.010699612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031466182,0.00025911292,0.0001467634,0.28412935,0.0002499606,0.012753425,0.00040526604,0.0005134454,0.0003546836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026011188,0.00019219542,0.22385912,0.000060907398,0.0000724671,0.0000512522,0.0013600625,0.00049296184,0.0009176569,0.0676524,0.59395736,0.1113576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049944187,0.000075677104,0.67659545,0.000034934725,0.000017551727,0.000045929894,0.0007641425,0.0067041,0.0026347712,0.04409068,0.26826456,0.00027274992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24316311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05418577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45273632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029312235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021370206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385231643","doi":"10.5296/jse.v13i3.21155","title":"Citation Metrics for Editors of Top-Ranked Journals Related to Higher Education: A Descriptive Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Studies in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Promotion (chess); Productivity; Descriptive statistics; Higher education; Curriculum; Library science; Index (typography); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Descriptive research; Political science; Bibliometrics; Sociology; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law; Economic growth; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.7562795425001854,"score_gpt":0.6748119371291061,"score_spread":0.08146760537107922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385231643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601558,0.0055307457,0.0001281232,0.004638255,0.028464297,0.00070225354,0.0000047014632,0.000005493789,0.0003703657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314815,0.0007679097,0.0021658216,0.00007123189,0.0012358058,0.000059259623,0.000001018892,0.000010741959,0.0025400652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925312,0.00032383588,0.0019061121,0.000295084,0.004651873,0.00029191203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97327244,0.0059105945,0.0013492145,0.00029575382,0.018956792,0.00021519189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027978875,0.00012518345,0.0005188011,0.08023193,0.0001624761,0.00031139492,0.0009451279,0.00007679879,0.00005567952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078102596,0.00008969441,0.0001631768,0.17838062,0.00007692355,0.00073628593,0.00017870755,0.00024748695,0.000023814384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015832449,0.0024991299,0.29866767,0.000043445907,0.00027446653,0.0000033345214,0.026869858,0.00043252058,0.00047812925,0.000513594,0.51170206,0.15835749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087004795,0.0013528568,0.73370945,0.00016515494,0.000049599956,0.0000068261315,0.20955832,0.00006116704,0.00019605194,0.03416329,0.019718299,0.00014891468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023160219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058944947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49198374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006330484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012628275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96969754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385251539","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0070","title":"Combining Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis to Understand the Scholarly Publications on Artificial Intelligence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social network analysis; Rank correlation; Rank (graph theory); Thematic analysis; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Bibliometrics; Network analysis; Test (biology); Data science; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Mathematics; Social capital; Ecology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6468525460429406,"score_gpt":0.5326740116500904,"score_spread":0.1141785343928502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385251539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972415,0.0007744983,0.0506745,0.14675088,0.0011665904,0.00026462405,0.00003107337,0.000051669424,0.0030446372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621034,0.00017201006,0.0011445346,0.0013875064,0.00064732233,0.0000033966553,0.0000039613874,0.000016203569,0.00041472263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97983557,0.00081457064,0.001793589,0.000640048,0.016027264,0.0008889344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672282,0.013587741,0.0012383839,0.0007119904,0.01640943,0.0008243053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13056369,0.00019431885,0.0005402768,0.5533087,0.0020369315,0.34038255,0.0055726864,0.0002424097,0.0001273391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22188647,0.000121579586,0.0003838136,0.8940364,0.0001743363,0.061048556,0.0013625985,0.002693906,0.00012324267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010288674,0.0001715949,0.16278838,0.0000042466427,0.0006247878,0.000031313575,0.0025789388,0.005865434,0.00018448534,0.08837257,0.16376549,0.57550985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021032858,0.00037674603,0.8159425,0.000018356935,0.00014142266,0.000020551504,0.0136411395,0.004943859,0.0000391777,0.13478005,0.029610388,0.00027546176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042305506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029566114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65315413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026053376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040743672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980766},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385340611","doi":"10.18280/i2m.220301","title":"A Systematic Literature Network Analysis: Research Mapping of International Roughness Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Instrumentation Mesure Métrologie","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Network analysis; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5190873366794236,"score_gpt":0.5808078946557572,"score_spread":0.06172055797633358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385340611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742697,0.0014968578,0.015496194,0.0025588043,0.001882956,0.0008920223,0.0000890717,0.00012421276,0.0031902017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752015,0.00041510697,0.000765439,0.000063289095,0.00013809612,0.00008005487,0.00007165199,0.000008856294,0.0009373657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841087,0.0017352347,0.0014056655,0.00071773765,0.011315684,0.000717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98659277,0.0069064037,0.0005445179,0.0007876823,0.004998432,0.00017019929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061806474,0.00015207072,0.00059351,0.077427894,0.0002790931,0.0018298711,0.0026567327,0.00020249408,0.00023351864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03031839,0.000106653984,0.0003075834,0.38571703,0.00018564575,0.0006995723,0.0007820458,0.0004510228,0.00023731597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000693583,0.00007761921,0.96163875,0.00043621036,0.0007985019,0.00004282678,0.0011089294,0.014162275,0.00035810747,0.0020390174,0.011937446,0.007330966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069529103,0.000115454815,0.8871464,0.00042018323,0.000058100613,0.000004972694,0.003559171,0.08716616,0.00016637552,0.019795936,0.0006872219,0.0001847129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000352704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021976975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30828914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014687018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001545862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385356703","doi":"10.59962/9780774837255-014","title":"“For Canada and for Science”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2714710631668627,"score_gpt":0.38528846530923333,"score_spread":0.11381740214237063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385356703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013587517,0.0004928713,0.0011435255,0.000033175755,0.0007835385,0.0016414397,0.0073171994,0.000020170217,0.9749806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007596307,0.00009282399,0.0013340681,0.000030604246,0.00006605006,9.547451e-7,0.000007935957,0.000014622858,0.99085665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942785,0.00001451755,0.00032044816,0.00090375106,0.0040396317,0.00044314042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908188,0.0014395074,0.00037213395,0.0004999363,0.0064699817,0.0003996672],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044024875,0.00010355995,0.00044125135,0.004131989,0.0006435048,0.0017712181,0.0023210465,0.00018667297,0.00034007913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017922982,0.00018571202,0.00014386144,0.0011597022,0.0018133258,0.00017056195,0.00096669083,0.0001299977,0.0000014868708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032403645,0.000011111065,0.0001763163,0.000054779073,0.000040886232,0.000025451182,0.000058110283,3.7141203e-7,0.000017427434,0.0025601706,0.7729724,0.22405058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006110426,0.00018188139,0.0009775424,0.0000616501,0.000029102564,0.0000104269,0.00008516096,0.00023455378,0.000014612577,0.012222754,0.98533934,0.00023195121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89246505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97865963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22381863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020029902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002093242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385403304","doi":"10.5057/kansei.10.4_193","title":"Evaluation and Impact of Academic Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6076940962352206,"score_gpt":0.5682545950442355,"score_spread":0.03943950119098516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385403304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841425,0.006147119,0.009252732,0.00006141309,0.00016555899,0.0000695643,0.0000052236046,0.0000021837952,0.00015373089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105936,0.0017779485,0.0070565958,0.000006699343,0.0000741402,3.8671453e-7,8.1327244e-8,0.0000073626265,0.000017446164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99207073,0.000090658184,0.0012091503,0.00013462853,0.0062526995,0.0002421467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99231344,0.000993655,0.0010573145,0.00018673363,0.0051706,0.00027823463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04064479,0.00010194575,0.00042209518,0.008596309,0.000037152364,0.00009276694,0.00079624134,0.00012717582,0.00021176688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113316355,0.00006795109,0.00054014864,0.020380165,0.00008354848,0.00069757126,0.00011736781,0.00046491236,0.0000013997017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070437614,0.00017681925,0.4635682,0.00006400245,0.00070723647,0.0000018937365,0.008837482,0.010548241,0.26555791,0.00006367585,0.009065563,0.24133852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077461783,0.00056776666,0.9203976,0.00010627062,0.00006250822,0.000086269385,0.0011583178,0.06659044,0.0085666245,0.0014522175,0.00012417187,0.00011319894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020409769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4465382e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4568294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012072004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032206788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385429858","doi":"10.1021/cen-10125-acsnews2","title":"Announcing the 2023 ACS fellows","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C&EN Global Enterprise","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Library science; National laboratory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Management; Engineering; Engineering physics; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4022989651191888,"score_gpt":0.5528123228618527,"score_spread":0.1505133577426639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385429858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92570364,0.0008245335,0.001800412,0.0062562157,0.0025720298,0.0003584917,0.00020720565,0.00015953853,0.06211795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98503685,0.0003116018,0.00009089052,0.0005468169,0.00025321214,0.000017301585,0.000008602815,0.00000976772,0.0137249455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897581,0.00031176442,0.000553566,0.0006917534,0.007846013,0.0008388205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418,0.0030496733,0.00014487037,0.0011310426,0.0011289063,0.000365471],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018307578,0.00016599182,0.00024112589,0.008830524,0.00042231192,0.0026440553,0.003966385,0.00010743407,0.00043686733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0286953,0.0000924473,0.00021117166,0.2083645,0.00017077792,0.000406692,0.0018948492,0.00025021174,0.013150919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024868983,0.000055792007,0.10967247,0.0000030098734,0.000021310023,0.00009411896,0.00023788952,0.00024807174,0.00029984195,0.0008464227,0.75498027,0.13351594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051363395,0.00011606576,0.28604642,0.00001728499,0.0000097249895,0.000024730578,0.0020131646,0.012094987,0.00013543534,0.013755781,0.6849861,0.0002866517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017795005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005225946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19953398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025741424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019043482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385478893","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3102401/v1","title":"Impact of Medical Technologies may be Predicted Using Constructed Graph Bibliometrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Random forest; Computer science; Citation; Pipeline (software); Data science; Machine learning; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Library science","score_opus":0.8155945909264893,"score_gpt":0.6904264773454634,"score_spread":0.12516811358102597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385478893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802497,0.0032006432,0.003767188,0.0027075675,0.0012780923,0.0019304992,0.005345102,0.00060891034,0.0009122728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98780096,0.009936407,0.0014552844,0.0000057237476,0.00014772282,0.000082357765,0.00017054075,0.000089755515,0.00031124012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8966259,0.002458095,0.0026818227,0.0026689207,0.09276905,0.0027962592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92490315,0.034285273,0.001116025,0.004770549,0.033332005,0.0015930121],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11498408,0.0006255918,0.0017218959,0.7129015,0.00060918386,0.0051245233,0.01689636,0.002925187,0.0026982862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4844106,0.00042927216,0.0012909671,0.82753986,0.004035088,0.00050465565,0.029168306,0.006545027,0.000121853016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013308611,0.0006630833,0.82892174,0.00049538707,0.00047867923,0.00048713258,0.00016528784,0.0009682644,0.0004775361,0.000949723,0.09374411,0.07251599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002245035,0.002160723,0.76267195,0.0016050906,0.000052014715,0.00009393634,0.00768515,0.13329218,0.0015401961,0.084844425,0.0023714497,0.0014378609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041905995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005792332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36942652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009828914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008653397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385503417","doi":"10.59350/642eb-hjq68","title":"Three questions with…. DeDe!","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Profiling (computer programming); World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.8126452199449594,"score_gpt":0.6257314045505707,"score_spread":0.18691381539438867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385503417","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03198555,0.0009792335,0.78568304,0.023277469,0.0012597387,0.00080116617,0.00013501657,0.00022864495,0.15565012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493492,0.00017526536,0.04445563,0.0006380984,0.00032115486,0.00006370533,0.000019528232,0.00003192983,0.00494547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836131,0.00011197389,0.0006948859,0.001516594,0.013528191,0.00053527625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899378,0.0030079663,0.0002889425,0.0017711238,0.0041823145,0.00081188005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009259668,0.00026193776,0.0005032268,0.050695747,0.00020767549,0.0063477894,0.0051847785,0.00029100562,0.0029701588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026989438,0.0001486831,0.00022026298,0.17009568,0.00020666838,0.00022458089,0.0053962064,0.0010796416,0.0027771438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006746109,0.000287966,0.15469234,0.00003545704,0.00013220476,0.00018353511,0.00013427394,0.00093946967,0.00015077104,0.049908776,0.4838044,0.30966336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045057337,0.0003408043,0.22023629,0.00004342965,0.000027994622,0.000015783451,0.00017208929,0.03995083,0.00029350977,0.61542386,0.122278705,0.0007661153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005430398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005399881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91736364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102541715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008593914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385505067","doi":"10.59350/7d1a0-p6451","title":"Preliminary Findings from the Review, Promotion, and Tenure Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Quarter (Canadian coin); Promotion (chess); Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Business; Psychology; Engineering; Law; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6017909596130846,"score_gpt":0.5807581960482786,"score_spread":0.02103276356480599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385505067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118008,0.0526966,0.0009231811,0.021955982,0.0016476182,0.0042699166,0.0001986057,0.000062903535,0.006444408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663796,0.020153029,0.0009910344,0.0011029457,0.000482357,0.0001832229,0.00003339955,0.000026423371,0.010648024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98567057,0.0007415374,0.000986037,0.0016615138,0.010511843,0.00042849977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869002,0.0058693434,0.0003667066,0.0024350607,0.0041286717,0.00030000726],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038741387,0.0002804861,0.0005789114,0.012688404,0.0004275876,0.004007064,0.0041448115,0.00022648653,0.0030296755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058678064,0.00012776292,0.00016072104,0.066763155,0.00030293848,0.00023406085,0.00961085,0.00082964404,0.00060457655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001250104,0.00033851413,0.24508744,0.000035261062,0.000042936066,0.000012723139,0.00035928233,5.1320535e-7,0.0000047867893,0.000018821383,0.7083009,0.045786325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000241042,0.00071132905,0.9529729,0.00032966185,0.000056785575,0.0000057937655,0.00047594713,0.00053007755,0.00002661565,0.014251561,0.030132936,0.0002653632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039659068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044764984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70788544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005491578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022674112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385650652","doi":"10.37724/rsu.2023.79.2.007","title":"Enthusiasm as an epistemic virtue in British scientific culture in the second half of the 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th century (illustrated in the works of naturalist J. Banks)","year":2023,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Рязанского государственного университета имени С А Есенина","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Naturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Virtue; Period (music); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Classics; Aesthetics; Theology","score_opus":0.09735117123961488,"score_gpt":0.400459204053362,"score_spread":0.3031080328137471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385650652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96694624,0.011516124,0.0000019777633,0.011392231,0.0031652548,0.0036231326,0.0006683917,0.000021469281,0.0026651928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409854,0.0030397198,0.000012493726,0.00085706875,0.00013173415,0.00011992029,0.0000492187,0.000054960474,0.0016363239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752166,0.0057956656,0.0039149118,0.0021685576,0.010887779,0.0020164596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822851,0.009180538,0.0021793728,0.0043265414,0.0017348411,0.0002936058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048913192,0.00083260884,0.0016070235,0.011352607,0.0014652725,0.004553188,0.013885071,0.00090361654,0.0006794277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010008749,0.00039175965,0.0008241426,0.1785077,0.0076956325,0.0013850366,0.0024298516,0.0036109604,0.000064094675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002681106,0.007219364,0.456312,0.0021510718,0.000589422,0.0006693983,0.2999369,0.0015811682,0.0055757556,0.05321349,0.10717897,0.062891364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007518634,0.00047093417,0.83907044,0.002274313,0.00011607868,0.0002995908,0.09967885,0.006995468,0.0009965358,0.009447568,0.0321269,0.0010046987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009429401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07215895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38275844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002861384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010590458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721339","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8235236","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open science; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3505033587503908,"score_gpt":0.4692609809700305,"score_spread":0.1187576222196397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28708315,0.0023339663,0.016715074,0.020892246,0.0044788606,0.013212363,0.0090355165,0.0005898061,0.645659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978421,0.0011562048,0.00017751261,0.00015349677,0.00017532738,7.1333653e-7,0.0019245836,0.00080786715,0.017183313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929924,0.000720393,0.00049045705,0.0013169085,0.0035757008,0.00090412685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990672,0.0006799398,0.0004909489,0.00092855113,0.0062756944,0.00095286156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012981825,0.00030079953,0.0005274824,0.047969304,0.0048516607,0.058566164,0.009118481,0.00015681588,0.0025010814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00939088,0.00021463694,0.000053051106,0.1496317,0.0006427531,0.001691353,0.0070401384,0.0005295478,0.0023382409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009589483,0.00005282374,0.000053623768,0.000046265395,0.000057167832,0.000016814662,0.000320037,0.0010413625,0.00017616285,0.00042306524,0.89484775,0.10286905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062310626,0.0008811343,0.0075723077,0.00015461349,0.000010614222,0.000017703293,0.0007222923,0.006127432,0.00065650226,0.00009516244,0.98280174,0.00033739535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027561716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006485071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005213272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021982707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094300","doi":"10.1101/2023.08.21.554192","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4728235389757298,"score_gpt":0.4649523744110101,"score_spread":0.007871164564719701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99185246,0.0032858565,0.0006299955,0.001244917,0.0016865204,0.00089720037,0.00023147953,0.00013993005,0.00003161161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944067,0.004030673,0.0006919705,0.0000886091,0.00018762868,0.0004068859,6.0647835e-7,0.00007082901,0.00011607752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98585826,0.00080329255,0.0021177495,0.0020620301,0.007851437,0.0013072359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904626,0.0018175864,0.0009907009,0.0020476694,0.0039265486,0.00075490505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027248727,0.0005290779,0.000987224,0.07366519,0.00021687686,0.0072624255,0.0039000378,0.00080826535,0.00034301303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027650345,0.00043853998,0.00023013382,0.097159036,0.00019673504,0.0010038496,0.0026468944,0.0018128145,0.00034074625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015524396,0.0002762632,0.97757196,0.000055322227,0.000013999955,0.00008972039,0.000016348913,0.000023600305,0.02020925,0.0002572789,0.0013668332,0.00010390133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038081448,0.000019733287,0.99324393,0.00021908851,0.000011323865,1.5050462e-8,0.000015354468,0.0018575382,0.0026696385,0.00013619785,0.00093512516,0.00051126385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060591527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046141253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023493843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066683267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010819928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386229488","doi":"10.51983/ajist-2014.4.2.104","title":"Bibliometric Study of Chemistry Literature in North Eastern Hill University During 2000 to 2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Subject (documents); Web of science; Computer science; Chemistry; Information retrieval; Mathematics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.07813479159987156,"score_gpt":0.3942982617843896,"score_spread":0.316163470184518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386229488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969279,0.000044446944,0.00040384804,0.0010521602,0.000103028826,0.00010181799,0.0000034099933,0.0000047763833,0.0013585881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995765,0.000039277344,0.00027984803,0.000017658514,0.0000091245565,2.5711378e-7,1.3865782e-7,0.0000011459449,0.000076048076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949507,0.00005130819,0.0007690427,0.00017595223,0.0037700029,0.00028298356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921722,0.00019007355,0.00061744073,0.0003299357,0.0064446996,0.00024567317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013119993,0.00007606923,0.00024069568,0.5080911,0.00014446404,0.0006000772,0.0020620965,0.00008637966,0.000020774512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023667198,0.000054721586,0.000026761045,0.77287364,0.0002558087,0.003762327,0.00048611383,0.00032925478,0.000014503863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028490053,0.00011306812,0.69857717,0.00000879572,0.0000036973681,0.0000117227955,0.0020278415,0.000048239504,0.0009426701,0.00005719454,0.00015177461,0.29802933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008461981,0.0005374943,0.98119265,0.000021813512,0.0000022323713,0.00008914037,0.011902946,0.00064951356,0.001741961,0.00019135865,0.002733695,0.00009099578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008391849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013906991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29793835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010050005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027320904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98455685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386371418","doi":"10.1093/cje/bead021","title":"The interdisciplinarity of economics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reputation; Positive economics; Discipline; Variety (cybernetics); Odds; Citation; Social science; Sociology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5418026054333259,"score_gpt":0.5292018174333343,"score_spread":0.012600787999991647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386371418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908123,0.00037031452,0.00025446402,0.0023890745,0.0020267512,0.00007045057,0.000040472565,0.0000036809292,0.0040324866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993445,0.003961392,0.00015151918,0.000042320746,0.00024143443,8.94788e-7,8.5443565e-7,0.000010413873,0.0021461837],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970287,0.000112911905,0.001655647,0.00023088779,0.0005912562,0.00038057947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029726,0.005675921,0.0013921786,0.0005973151,0.0017575042,0.00027981857],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028827924,0.000105157706,0.00042279914,0.0150585305,0.0002338534,0.0010423419,0.002918085,0.00007648756,0.000028992781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011731048,0.00006431338,0.00038409824,0.02019514,0.00026699313,0.0005682579,0.0009057107,0.00029829598,0.00018249494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037978272,0.0002053161,0.10243982,0.000016732209,0.00029081234,0.00003993517,0.0004592877,0.015471595,0.0002966844,0.077120826,0.31248716,0.49079204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020460528,0.0010544063,0.41466925,0.000032606957,0.000037564365,0.00022216162,0.005151716,0.11567205,0.004406817,0.122811235,0.3333935,0.0005026506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000072145845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019043517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4902894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016485158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003936967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386402131","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y","title":"The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Elite; China; Humanities; Social science; Citation analysis; Political science; Sociology; Citation; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.8933759979167228,"score_gpt":0.6993538977340414,"score_spread":0.1940221001826814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386402131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98807365,0.0024008544,0.000027933145,0.0010264065,0.00023022701,0.00035622797,0.000050694627,0.000020692538,0.0078133205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977904,0.0008165282,0.00006689679,0.000028725173,0.000025472054,0.000019708847,0.000002392713,0.0000048460092,0.0012450548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97931486,0.0014578373,0.0008258275,0.0010195652,0.016147384,0.0012345301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631076,0.033782538,0.00029161482,0.0004913129,0.0020990123,0.00022795447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16835909,0.00017386013,0.0006612338,0.34124807,0.002451258,0.0050068367,0.0025928724,0.00009899321,0.000043391454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054379962,0.000099471035,0.00014606814,0.80526614,0.005054522,0.00059656997,0.0021120864,0.00042851074,0.000044365595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090946,0.00010226754,0.87923145,0.000024762016,0.0001277269,0.000012168233,0.008029198,0.0001813181,0.00031745507,0.023858776,0.010844247,0.077219695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029308698,0.00031634653,0.95793754,0.0000064820692,0.000022880628,7.830575e-7,0.0045360043,0.025352975,0.00013026592,0.007529927,0.0037489533,0.00012477401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046130814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046325274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46401805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020266067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988474},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4386457599","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8344124422224187,"score_gpt":0.607260966353585,"score_spread":0.22715147586883377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386457599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987256,0.004267332,0.000435464,0.004119038,0.0016483669,0.0006604557,0.00012117922,0.000057705274,0.0014344775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848993,0.008602128,0.0002787311,0.00013172731,0.0001648521,0.0002342757,0.00004472228,0.000027303555,0.005616958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819511,0.0007214453,0.0019439837,0.0014148346,0.013046432,0.00092220365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918632,0.0029977134,0.0006946445,0.001241262,0.0026770204,0.0005261597],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03520822,0.00031348207,0.00075130234,0.1103398,0.00014479362,0.0068795052,0.0037211743,0.0005406108,0.0008249134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044857446,0.00022822154,0.00021356116,0.09986328,0.0001294407,0.00066592655,0.0035778643,0.0016076842,0.0005283271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107306505,0.00017057148,0.9574732,0.000017889284,0.000005179956,0.00003547107,0.00019334063,0.00004894463,0.000094391224,0.00014321378,0.010808204,0.030998835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025802315,0.000014623169,0.98251134,0.00010835522,0.000004023321,0.000001801606,0.00021952932,0.003552853,0.00007948184,0.011394236,0.0015905178,0.00026521794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013238012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003595826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030733619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034399139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005835392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386457741","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.1","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Psychological intervention; Elite; Peer review; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8519097049606796,"score_gpt":0.613279302837462,"score_spread":0.23863040212321762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386457741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835972,0.00238037,0.0014199325,0.00441248,0.0014504646,0.0008386226,0.000089780486,0.00007320625,0.0057379054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760907,0.0060917987,0.00046085613,0.00009385156,0.00008718416,0.00024215209,0.000037711172,0.000024404686,0.016871318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823486,0.0007256957,0.0021714594,0.0016177774,0.012140429,0.00099601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907368,0.0039352844,0.00064611,0.0013415944,0.0028080002,0.0005322502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038827714,0.00033333554,0.0007919988,0.16582383,0.00013458892,0.009993942,0.004293629,0.0005970737,0.0022901592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036759354,0.0002234801,0.00022779455,0.14154968,0.00013755327,0.0008509715,0.004450582,0.0015887379,0.00046957456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000925846,0.00019458433,0.9404108,0.000017419683,0.000004627796,0.000028632316,0.00012334081,0.00003569636,0.00008546584,0.00034733803,0.0076429755,0.051099848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024356492,0.0000144497735,0.95844406,0.00007836547,0.0000036087226,0.0000018782756,0.00030944246,0.005862699,0.000052000552,0.033975776,0.0007387025,0.000275448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027047417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007874564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0508244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036484346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054289907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386460583","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.1.sa3","title":"Reviewer #1 (Public Review): Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Publishing; Elite; Psychological intervention; Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7978525289254812,"score_gpt":0.6060095791438209,"score_spread":0.19184294978166028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386460583","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042718532,0.8509764,0.00011375717,0.1319766,0.0045476,0.0029706599,0.00032298025,0.000072015384,0.008592775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003337614,0.7016756,0.0000829456,0.0044257026,0.0002101327,0.0006795649,0.00033133265,0.00004304303,0.29221794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632111,0.0025810152,0.0058873883,0.0024896618,0.023998767,0.0018320204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469424,0.009052183,0.003202232,0.0041354387,0.035019755,0.0016480129],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11075384,0.0007373836,0.0030255818,0.11252134,0.00021425734,0.0051192637,0.0069263587,0.00064809545,0.018047266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34207886,0.00045581633,0.0007279517,0.28998402,0.00020592072,0.00174329,0.0021696698,0.0022094154,0.0017809458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014589549,0.00015926284,0.045265935,0.002160568,0.0000075248063,0.000019389168,0.0000072035214,4.9530676e-8,0.0000013178386,0.000044528846,0.7329228,0.21940997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017348232,0.000024071145,0.2922442,0.013416799,0.0000307554,0.00000612455,0.000016191969,0.00006788431,7.241011e-7,0.0005840356,0.6930028,0.00043292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008997164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007892423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28362516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058336405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010816165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386533659","doi":"10.1101/2023.09.07.23295220","title":"Computational Methods for Characterizing Research Outputs, Collaborative Networks and Thematic Concentration: a Case Study in Primary Care Research Evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Mainstream; Thematic map; Thematic analysis; Altmetrics; Social network analysis; Computer science; Scopus; Data science; Information retrieval; Citation; Collaborative network; Social media; Library science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Knowledge management; Social science; Geography; Sociology; Political science; Cartography","score_opus":0.8561601359466112,"score_gpt":0.7083878490509442,"score_spread":0.14777228689566702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386533659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95317394,0.0051066247,0.029014044,0.0009169277,0.0009623023,0.010351736,0.000117805444,0.000033687607,0.00032296532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98360056,0.00025302684,0.013000091,0.00002431957,0.00023937049,0.0024866096,0.00016133208,0.000043657426,0.00019103965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515228,0.02178658,0.002199915,0.002881919,0.02010494,0.001503809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90354306,0.06260177,0.00042938933,0.0011069553,0.031938296,0.00038053482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3326246,0.00030915008,0.00087162596,0.04280888,0.0010850688,0.0051671453,0.0018817313,0.0004009839,0.000040364936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08598383,0.00024807442,0.00011380316,0.12384406,0.0005166797,0.00040452738,0.0038546647,0.0021716405,0.000023493076],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031134248,0.00091175176,0.45711464,0.0006646032,0.00019099949,0.0009520361,0.050670072,0.021793388,0.00017762867,0.00063646596,0.0021633874,0.4644137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018927098,0.00060806726,0.21929541,0.00024752034,0.000026411608,0.000036572346,0.07682578,0.676755,0.00003624951,0.023582952,0.0003195849,0.000373715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028053115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029651314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65496165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012590666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030225094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387014740","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04837-9","title":"An analysis of international mobility and research productivity in computer science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; China; Scopus; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Political science; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.707261089982269,"score_gpt":0.6701808773690084,"score_spread":0.037080212613260555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387014740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943623,0.000078540725,0.00355722,0.0003848863,0.0007339784,0.00025723924,0.00005476693,0.00002749727,0.0005436039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813175,0.00009510789,0.0015479162,0.000011316608,0.000044815613,0.0000082691395,0.0000065723652,0.000004858407,0.00014939543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659516,0.0005454489,0.0008441667,0.0018661858,0.029756557,0.0010360458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801772,0.005865741,0.00019778052,0.001525916,0.011632155,0.000601194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2598549,0.00011562317,0.00041521498,0.6201922,0.0003628971,0.0026918354,0.004839997,0.0000811031,0.00011104836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11829817,0.00008886992,0.00009881279,0.91921633,0.0023682306,0.0018393276,0.0025145065,0.00036501465,0.00005810061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009395817,0.00029837713,0.8502404,0.0000028803445,0.000013361817,0.0000046341247,0.00044300497,0.003165475,0.0020081324,0.0005085403,0.00014112827,0.14316466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011186018,0.00008748834,0.65527844,0.0000015478528,0.0000039105526,4.505742e-7,0.00018844593,0.34199014,0.0007556351,0.0012678823,0.00025025877,0.000063908876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003420087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010272436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33882466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035268656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047275695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387091624","doi":"10.54590/pop.2023.014","title":"Le libre accès dans les sciences humaines au Canada: une conversation","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.7960548915239892,"score_gpt":0.581729472973685,"score_spread":0.21432541855030418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387091624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.741314,0.0018399569,0.0003953766,0.13750772,0.0055733435,0.0008723039,0.00027545006,0.000093676375,0.1121282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95528394,0.0002487387,0.00012673844,0.0005711601,0.0003386099,0.000118272896,0.000030924257,0.000031728196,0.04324987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98468685,0.0011708504,0.0012731563,0.0015317088,0.008799295,0.0025381264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050355,0.0042699035,0.00050102506,0.0010880764,0.0021595487,0.0014778771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033528496,0.00036065685,0.000616588,0.01876543,0.0034250445,0.015159422,0.008621578,0.00025423506,0.001967724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024990931,0.00031640547,0.00015663476,0.23095784,0.002452548,0.0070043528,0.0046565533,0.00044232653,0.0010942171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015585783,0.00029866595,0.510414,0.000041363695,0.000070828326,0.00008076653,0.0018815611,0.00034814616,0.00023943017,0.11622411,0.22931075,0.14107479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000697907,0.00016912435,0.366348,0.000037137033,0.000019534617,0.0000070973056,0.013370389,0.0225927,0.00050601206,0.00333687,0.5924426,0.00047266667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8734683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82556015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36313182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010294038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039465867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387116974","doi":"10.15626/mp.2023.4020","title":"A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta-Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Publication; Reproducibility; Psychology; Applied psychology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.9415478893122667,"score_gpt":0.728999741796331,"score_spread":0.21254814751593576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387116974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61224556,0.0019720092,0.046274543,0.30572176,0.012533411,0.0012701368,0.00029407878,0.00035047726,0.019338042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314603,0.00032473187,0.014513681,0.03094783,0.0006617408,0.0003560936,0.00007481842,0.000061990504,0.021598773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793342,0.0027436146,0.0017683737,0.0040859315,0.010566524,0.0015013589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98288405,0.007389652,0.0005935253,0.003422389,0.0049312357,0.00077915326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11937234,0.00034800058,0.001125819,0.041367635,0.0006105331,0.001987144,0.004528896,0.00041979208,0.009483469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08018442,0.00023159389,0.0006321585,0.14779978,0.0005005564,0.00092605554,0.0015373698,0.0010005754,0.0042569917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068243215,0.00033669043,0.08249592,0.0000043348236,0.00025121338,0.00003557392,0.00020511782,0.00014916093,0.00031217915,0.00040086466,0.8735426,0.0421981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005116293,0.00014778701,0.687478,0.0000028452964,0.00003824623,0.000050178343,0.00020198499,0.00035021093,0.00004318396,0.09205174,0.21890283,0.00022139077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011356379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011474239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6546398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078450066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033289773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387130658","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.140810.1","title":"The SCOPE framework – implementing the ideals of responsible research assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Research England; Newcastle University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Open peer review; Plant biology; Engineering ethics; Physiology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Biology; Computer science; Engineering; Botany; Programming language","score_opus":0.938691784200287,"score_gpt":0.7806215576158355,"score_spread":0.15807022658445147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387130658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43040872,0.03999084,0.015165048,0.2947274,0.013112981,0.021983033,0.0022278077,0.0005515774,0.18183257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86931884,0.026113566,0.0070592966,0.00012777545,0.0014744116,0.0016344379,0.000050216568,0.00025095805,0.09397047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84900814,0.022231504,0.0049445997,0.003913002,0.113034435,0.006868312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68170077,0.27900892,0.0010711524,0.009460736,0.027872328,0.00088605843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5320193,0.00043158093,0.0009099101,0.063234836,0.0049956013,0.016030094,0.028745115,0.00067246886,0.0013244381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35626563,0.00021135947,0.0006482687,0.24513152,0.002916405,0.0002900364,0.05764325,0.009082643,0.0017454366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020429703,0.0001979794,0.03323454,0.00012587465,0.00023103789,0.00006921356,0.0006989426,0.00039603544,0.0011969086,0.09910916,0.6988147,0.16572133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022538168,0.00027098812,0.10869657,0.00023193086,0.000009439392,0.0000026375735,0.004361678,0.005390418,0.0015679054,0.6719086,0.20704806,0.0002863611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020880485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005156543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5727995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065303594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008259402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387276382","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104895","title":"Gender homophily: In-group citation preferences and the gender disadvantage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Homophily; Citation; Disadvantage; Gender gap; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.8735278668469351,"score_gpt":0.6882343069839548,"score_spread":0.18529355986298024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387276382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542719,0.0010186238,0.00019386955,0.013346482,0.00011797197,0.0007445675,0.000029399516,0.000043095457,0.030234082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995448,0.002490666,0.000072302995,0.00018825273,0.0002084966,0.000092169146,0.000005240861,0.000012507266,0.0014823994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831686,0.002005097,0.0005509446,0.0007606454,0.012216867,0.0012978163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761494,0.020934854,0.00008522092,0.0008161785,0.0015664946,0.0004478601],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.077597044,0.00012797992,0.00025847784,0.08438631,0.0005231457,0.0027653167,0.002111685,0.00010502212,0.00016649648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093715794,0.00006848329,0.00008225002,0.27412868,0.0010935054,0.0005956709,0.0015272305,0.00064000615,0.0009851077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022643528,0.0001842767,0.2673964,0.00004929052,0.000039519182,0.000065762404,0.009688186,0.00009517499,0.00086504413,0.34833595,0.043433987,0.32961997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008367837,0.000047657322,0.590648,0.000003912742,8.1768644e-7,0.0000029285038,0.00354194,0.004818919,0.00002330403,0.39222282,0.0077676293,0.00008529945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011117919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013438713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32953468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015086264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004418918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979275},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4387334126","doi":"10.26443/seismica.v2i2.1091","title":"Editorial workflow of a community-led, all-volunteer scientific journal: lessons from the launch of Seismica","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seismica","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Workflow; Ethos; Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Open science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Political science; Computer security; Physics","score_opus":0.5002007100344366,"score_gpt":0.5435157531541576,"score_spread":0.04331504311972101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92032045,0.0005105327,0.00075589155,0.015708406,0.05995612,0.00029314507,0.00057382544,0.000045245997,0.0018363721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98910743,0.00023811735,0.00038519676,0.00029375285,0.006282383,0.000006859855,0.000031638112,0.000023331158,0.0036312824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847819,0.0014658282,0.001199388,0.0004315291,0.011389461,0.00073188444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746969,0.017471395,0.00068746065,0.0019792055,0.0048152492,0.0003498227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04609596,0.00018592007,0.00051791285,0.018332006,0.0009900734,0.0021075723,0.006663002,0.00020095409,0.0004207297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03658178,0.00010983992,0.00037831234,0.13661078,0.0009766985,0.00040527643,0.0018956074,0.0012671362,0.00051403674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042222233,0.00014933688,0.0027130388,0.0000038088192,0.000054892116,0.0000026123248,0.0018147653,0.000194365,0.004921045,0.00010494075,0.96375537,0.026243595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061140506,0.000108510016,0.010337452,0.000035137316,0.000019328407,0.0000031534373,0.0024133106,0.00375517,0.0015675214,0.036101,0.94490945,0.00013853492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011315641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046887086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118278764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007463232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053304504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387363035","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0292306","title":"Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rating scale; Reliability (semiconductor); Quality (philosophy); Index (typography); Publication bias; Rating system; Actuarial science; Medicine; Statistics; Applied psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Economics; Confidence interval","score_opus":0.9369708358436797,"score_gpt":0.6706692369424758,"score_spread":0.26630159890120386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387363035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85498947,0.031539883,0.0006884243,0.03380707,0.00028769547,0.004012603,0.000104184386,0.00014728412,0.07442338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624264,0.025525758,0.002877416,0.000100519705,0.00014638093,0.00042117276,0.000028184202,0.000021588328,0.008452556],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710934,0.00046570963,0.00082216616,0.0005234735,0.02651556,0.0005797023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96706945,0.017691368,0.00019222904,0.0010573776,0.013779356,0.00021021934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10036003,0.00006507763,0.00032514936,0.04750787,0.00017598053,0.0003352588,0.0016588499,0.000052957883,0.00037757595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17924328,0.00004986943,0.000068968504,0.36844903,0.00013867996,0.00020051743,0.0006704395,0.00038120153,0.0010312969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027585987,0.005928068,0.228751,0.008239053,0.0002484068,0.000091045775,0.0015299948,0.000060828253,0.06127894,0.01732165,0.16716631,0.50910884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014622999,0.0024301573,0.4170791,0.035473052,0.00017482076,0.0000056451213,0.009219109,0.07705466,0.08521632,0.124944575,0.23134053,0.002439041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065917535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019131208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5066698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077231416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016628567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387475799","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.09.008","title":"Are papers in Evolution &amp; Human Behavior easy? A review of Scientific Papers Made Easy: How to Write with Clarity and Impact in the Life Sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution and Human Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Psychology; Cognitive science; Biology","score_opus":0.6014104113581248,"score_gpt":0.5760013368549654,"score_spread":0.025409074503159434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387475799","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13470876,0.8610896,0.0000039602673,0.00019598444,0.00018403934,0.0031785204,0.00026901165,0.000030283023,0.00033985527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19402494,0.8022747,0.000097855715,0.000093028386,0.00008699086,0.0008675129,0.00008445164,0.00005248019,0.0024180375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777544,0.0012669271,0.0015111185,0.0017688585,0.0067450404,0.0009326304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952848,0.0009459885,0.001198118,0.0011563745,0.0008336093,0.00058112235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027785387,0.00054057443,0.0017763189,0.03819028,0.0011662901,0.0021743656,0.0022411477,0.00033673111,0.00021086252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005980404,0.00031091395,0.00040686197,0.10356899,0.001579388,0.00051823386,0.0006800597,0.00092072156,0.000039055398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002420403,0.0014668965,0.7407284,0.011234759,0.00005069743,0.000120943994,0.00048241258,0.0000028336535,0.00022015428,0.0025136122,0.0062824255,0.23687266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003313732,0.00030235358,0.8971078,0.011417765,0.00026252412,0.000034963883,0.0005430783,0.0000029161836,1.14957906e-7,0.00007100146,0.089465246,0.00046089434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069062546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036131074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23641177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054862833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073704956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387496759","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103703","title":"Bibliometric evaluation of negative publications from orthopedics and traumatology from the ten most influential journals of 2009–2010 and 2019–2020: A comparative study with the “Orthopedics &amp; Traumatology: Surgery &amp; Research” journal, using the same analysis of submitted and accepted articles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Traumatology; Orthopedic surgery; Medicine; General surgery; Surgery","score_opus":0.7620079873526839,"score_gpt":0.5966025595515161,"score_spread":0.16540542780116785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387496759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98084587,0.010382654,0.00039369287,0.0060529034,0.00021637503,0.0014231092,0.0006345743,0.000019574314,0.000031241012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991176,0.008270144,0.0002031822,0.00004792902,0.000060904953,0.0000843947,0.00009003965,0.000032176886,0.00003523757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95269054,0.022397386,0.0035875924,0.0014109799,0.018289251,0.0016242668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76429254,0.20260553,0.002465263,0.0020399136,0.027873017,0.00072376354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1866951,0.0004146642,0.0022564998,0.19137959,0.0022162732,0.0015878057,0.0021419055,0.00045022336,0.00058843516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08789509,0.00021564435,0.0004026775,0.5580453,0.008630759,0.00093002775,0.0013992102,0.0025936149,0.0000090894655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004096232,0.00043172884,0.9293408,0.000011489542,0.0021190604,0.000017078322,0.007395822,0.0001809933,0.00021369966,0.000041485197,0.015632132,0.044206098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096064364,0.00014761745,0.95488214,0.000046167337,0.00077541516,0.00009729774,0.03371046,0.0071084434,0.00005786032,0.0013578365,0.00065782736,0.00019830326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068445355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010903453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36666572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081258375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023780442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387504686","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102236","title":"Converting to Open Access in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Journal: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Obstetrics and gynaecology; Publishing; Bibliometrics; Medicine; China; Gynecology; Citation analysis; Library science; Obstetrics; Political science; Pregnancy; Computer science; Citation; Biology","score_opus":0.33587934064638963,"score_gpt":0.5104311862779564,"score_spread":0.17455184563156673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387504686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97197556,0.007899338,0.00031438904,0.0020593966,0.016143708,0.0003464662,0.000037543734,0.00000655221,0.0012170243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953013,0.0028032428,0.00046864056,0.0008246457,0.00002931042,0.0000065145473,0.0000021731591,0.000020848027,0.00054331025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887804,0.0006985111,0.0026685041,0.00078218844,0.0057873996,0.0012830277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8499213,0.1366813,0.0023844114,0.00071534753,0.007962206,0.0023354278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028090382,0.00029554215,0.0015134686,0.6913728,0.0004996498,0.00649597,0.0061640916,0.0003064786,0.0010165541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55016726,0.00023220788,0.00020160495,0.8818215,0.00015445257,0.0018176184,0.0045587304,0.0011316455,0.000012578488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030948981,0.00004812974,0.5602049,0.000005837184,0.00013602694,0.002793986,0.00006723063,0.00061108184,0.0000031056668,0.0000376484,0.0069190143,0.4291699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018506709,0.00041332335,0.96229005,0.000002111827,0.00009178179,0.00005748884,0.0007977149,0.0025302737,0.000012638562,0.0015341359,0.030158624,0.0002611935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012459558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021729896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5220769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021282446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039964537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387703401","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2023.1274290","title":"The top 100 most cited articles in helical tomotherapy: a scoping review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Jilin University","keywords":"Tomotherapy; Citation; Bibliometrics; Radiation oncology; Science Citation Index; Medical physics; Medicine; Web of science; Library science; Oncology; Radiation therapy; Internal medicine; Computer science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.7200389510255907,"score_gpt":0.6698379028857864,"score_spread":0.050201048139804305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387703401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011909181,0.99235165,0.00037054453,0.0016520914,0.0022733144,0.0023241788,0.000019798617,0.000026774345,0.00096970896],"genre_scores_gemma":[6.8495945e-7,0.9967501,0.00080146134,0.00045916293,0.00013424303,0.0003749526,0.0000087966655,0.00003375897,0.0014368104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886331,0.0026732504,0.002598857,0.001119425,0.0038307635,0.0011446142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97788155,0.01917767,0.0007431346,0.0012819775,0.00061602733,0.00029963622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04435139,0.0003234715,0.0028240844,0.056381147,0.00020568632,0.00076606043,0.0042116507,0.00055167085,0.00019268191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061238937,0.00018099448,0.0004010546,0.3098515,0.00036201326,0.00016459066,0.0009417219,0.001092062,0.00047475126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006667102,0.00005770093,0.000761465,0.0016874853,0.000020706195,0.00006729695,0.00001788831,6.9750644e-7,1.6631951e-8,0.000058092035,0.09428481,0.9030372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026715992,0.00010384355,0.00012868726,0.031391352,0.00002103229,0.000007698692,0.00006212529,0.00018997937,7.0678134e-8,0.002062039,0.9655648,0.00020124676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005196588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002935182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009816719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021499158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98404133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387704100","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2023-0113","title":"Exploring international collaboration and language dynamics in Digital Humanities: insights from co-authorship networks in canonical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Centrality; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Multilingualism; Publishing; Social science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.554330087267495,"score_gpt":0.5669016626813276,"score_spread":0.01257157541383258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387704100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99685395,0.00031331799,0.0009212173,0.00055800856,0.0006171354,0.00008020027,0.00001938094,0.0000044059334,0.0006323765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853474,0.0009792472,0.00011109369,0.000032858847,0.00017163638,0.000003499935,0.00002699791,0.0000058703176,0.00013403522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954612,0.00014717862,0.0009782709,0.00018290644,0.0030432006,0.00018722382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965035,0.002012607,0.0004683349,0.00009328621,0.0008047213,0.00011758749],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005215735,0.00007689741,0.0002028429,0.026406161,0.000060309998,0.0036074484,0.00047843787,0.000058841564,0.00009400203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006338662,0.000060724065,0.000043453994,0.029515218,0.000040087813,0.004736879,0.00010535635,0.00032509043,0.000015221601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019638037,0.0001447967,0.8626819,0.000004035611,0.000039149032,0.00042238703,0.013543134,0.010159127,0.00069209037,0.0016568038,0.001119343,0.10934084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693838,0.00015721147,0.83297217,0.000091605514,0.0000041900844,0.000015398688,0.059371497,0.09040766,0.00016174519,0.014560607,0.0004207076,0.00014336416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012725455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087178976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109197475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005490333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011800554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860045","doi":"10.1002/pra2.809","title":"“I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Equity (law); Public relations; Thematic analysis; Scholarly communication; Reflexivity; Political science; Discipline; Open access publishing; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.4761555824217794,"score_gpt":0.5349972851587399,"score_spread":0.05884170273696049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840356,0.0000050708013,0.00001582683,0.01130931,0.000141613,0.00087541924,0.000008971476,0.000028533139,0.0035796333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996638,0.000014241107,0.00007233905,0.000065905566,0.000006037385,0.00008346629,0.0000014958217,0.000002182128,0.00009054566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942715,0.000018746607,0.0008316648,0.00028528145,0.004126623,0.00046616443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98985493,0.0020023515,0.0013383769,0.00018261369,0.0065711476,0.00005057554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06982689,0.00007544569,0.0001903169,0.031743117,0.0005769981,0.011370842,0.007095513,0.00013288211,0.00000236474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31794578,0.000042584496,0.000023134276,0.24120012,0.00023480349,0.0254376,0.004969868,0.00028487184,0.000003734247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026036291,0.000010002797,0.9606797,0.000006155325,0.0000015421562,9.439377e-9,0.0021574437,0.000008770124,0.0009057817,0.010768911,0.00060404645,0.024855038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037371155,0.000030229488,0.9442199,0.000020224254,0.0000013336171,3.24685e-7,0.0072938288,0.010633652,0.0061482443,0.029213836,0.0019996485,0.000065095366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073021154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046976194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24811888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003817824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031825888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860424","doi":"10.1002/pra2.879","title":"Storytelling for Translational Research Impact","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University","keywords":"Storytelling; Craft; Narrative; Plot (graphics); Translational research; Session (web analytics); Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; World Wide Web; Literature; Medicine","score_opus":0.43981751900481403,"score_gpt":0.5726669811555516,"score_spread":0.13284946215073756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97793573,0.000032689004,0.00057953276,0.014850013,0.00031021764,0.001170181,0.00011256592,0.0000705782,0.0049384967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987366,0.000030221396,0.0005846612,0.00002433209,0.000020908305,0.0000764622,0.0000020131429,0.0000025755965,0.00052218395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223375,0.0000071762156,0.0005089997,0.00022095811,0.006533002,0.0004960985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652046,0.0026917304,0.0005287742,0.00013013394,0.031369343,0.00007541317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06898772,0.000058515605,0.00014053166,0.041167665,0.0010560377,0.0010156183,0.0017071163,0.00013373564,0.0000035746555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14105213,0.0000363768,0.0000758798,0.17586672,0.00044725,0.0028631308,0.0003113503,0.00015488647,0.00002022518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046534202,0.0000313759,0.354428,0.00004232068,0.000022553002,7.6063e-9,0.0013842381,0.00007859893,0.015241968,0.40867588,0.052911393,0.16713713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001138932,0.00036691912,0.16943215,0.00001797115,0.00000873014,0.0000020818775,0.0051476257,0.06763939,0.035764575,0.5113504,0.20893988,0.00019132286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039719516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.5436086e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18499584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024213997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038916976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97936314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387900619","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvad099","title":"Open Access publishing: benefits and challenges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Medicine; Publishing","score_opus":0.8294517986159284,"score_gpt":0.5683196420842168,"score_spread":0.2611321565317116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387900619","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437094,0.41714314,0.0048064627,0.024440993,0.0042557255,0.00042161322,0.000014177193,0.00006288748,0.20514561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95090985,0.047588214,0.0006345522,0.00006503823,0.0005720605,4.5909698e-7,9.07098e-7,0.00003522159,0.00019367973],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839587,0.0017408732,0.00080436596,0.00048950384,0.008105605,0.00046379212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940741,0.0012360329,0.00040024935,0.0007831233,0.0029660526,0.000540431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11208746,0.0001353113,0.00054630294,0.029276382,0.00027759557,0.031592596,0.008568552,0.00003683391,0.000032784683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031049183,0.00009513267,0.00053233135,0.05878543,0.00013808053,0.0073567717,0.0029723274,0.00039667462,0.000093785326],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015681206,0.000023529923,0.0006297757,0.00000439733,0.00017337724,0.00032427712,0.0002994629,0.0010266748,0.0000095308,0.0003568489,0.015980316,0.9811561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014012856,0.00021516751,0.3199811,0.00024604643,0.000077104785,0.0005071135,0.0014521308,0.0004788198,0.000114636954,0.0031612557,0.67213064,0.00023468796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005118746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.376021e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98092145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000637186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011838305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387937804","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04846-8","title":"Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Scope (computer science); Balance (ability); Term (time); Technological change; Scientific literature; Computer science; Psychology; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.8337135587900643,"score_gpt":0.7017474832136088,"score_spread":0.13196607557645545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387937804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867854,0.00039416045,0.0007096247,0.0016842579,0.0012752577,0.0006159081,0.00008252689,0.00013788593,0.008314973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934497,0.000066512664,0.00017004227,0.000008185309,0.00005915931,0.000027771594,0.000007639429,0.000014834086,0.006196159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9527063,0.0014190105,0.0010379587,0.0017600128,0.040771548,0.0023052157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486988,0.03315534,0.00043448378,0.0036091383,0.013287753,0.00081448787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2891755,0.0002291591,0.0004907206,0.36658043,0.0020940544,0.0065724277,0.011121862,0.00026756973,0.0004950324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3148681,0.00011146743,0.00058400154,0.8970405,0.005796964,0.0006987143,0.008312862,0.0011635971,0.002714852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040872503,0.0004709522,0.4092692,0.000014735343,0.000039664214,0.000041519215,0.0006525233,0.0004404039,0.008068422,0.009028022,0.26109558,0.31083807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035433663,0.00062199193,0.9154066,0.000014331066,0.000004763411,0.000010986892,0.0012663421,0.016744405,0.002787363,0.048007637,0.01455087,0.00023038022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058802612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015150567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53046006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000500513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079459377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388106222","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04854-8","title":"Publish and flourish: investigating publication requirements for PhD students in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"China; Publication; Index (typography); Citation; Science Citation Index; Library science; Sample (material); Citation index; Order (exchange); Publishing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business; Law","score_opus":0.7616037686334712,"score_gpt":0.6142861649481008,"score_spread":0.1473176036853704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388106222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98978925,0.00024303145,0.0012130716,0.0030925188,0.00120353,0.0009063801,0.00007433125,0.000102951584,0.0033749586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861603,0.00012530477,0.00264154,0.0002848763,0.00010488092,0.000077887256,0.00005327011,0.000023597488,0.010528338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97883165,0.0002242631,0.0011757296,0.0014338029,0.01704975,0.0012847835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879489,0.004820972,0.00047884253,0.00095948146,0.0048569287,0.00093488424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09208526,0.0002011515,0.0003639384,0.26271707,0.00047587432,0.011739424,0.0037273553,0.0001577629,0.00008848673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32471627,0.00016441196,0.000100846126,0.6774588,0.0002417299,0.0026092643,0.0020070826,0.0002819982,0.00024410627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004543041,0.000110589506,0.8474698,0.0000133753,0.000006148119,0.0000024578753,0.0003682068,0.000025876503,0.00023867274,0.00072903006,0.057898887,0.093132384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010357741,0.0000939184,0.9385756,0.000012735093,0.000003228749,0.0000012312928,0.00034574856,0.022264011,0.00017976765,0.010142177,0.027127868,0.00021788769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095900294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003293428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41474175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027173758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021876216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388196088","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1281219","title":"Benefits and geography of international collaboration for PhD students in biology from four global south countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Geopolitics; Publishing; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Global South; Distribution (mathematics); Library science; Economic geography; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.24237755093929103,"score_gpt":0.5318181706592143,"score_spread":0.2894406197199233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388196088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910971,0.0016091883,0.001839695,0.0007263503,0.0038738642,0.0002933607,0.00044371936,0.0000060196085,0.00011070876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951858,0.00079538557,0.003703206,0.000047812075,0.000063154126,0.0000493391,0.00009991487,0.0000029217542,0.0000524503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769896,0.00007317539,0.0003962359,0.0003413497,0.0013123509,0.00017791371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980635,0.000495213,0.00016668472,0.00015538446,0.0010622847,0.000056935984],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036983362,0.00006197105,0.00016112484,0.019277237,0.00004113911,0.00035536507,0.0006541724,0.00008134372,0.000015857224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055289306,0.000054703756,0.000027762373,0.046478502,0.000077202545,0.00028427373,0.00013434885,0.000045638575,0.000005270926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003442953,0.000060979168,0.9320534,0.0000018777187,0.0000076914275,7.711309e-8,0.0004142692,0.000052683365,0.0000067494784,0.00038752414,0.008536469,0.058443855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044762588,0.000036458805,0.9615522,0.000010076545,0.0000019124418,7.45061e-8,0.004516027,0.0015852014,0.000027332748,0.027877254,0.0038946245,0.00005123013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022662406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014336174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058392625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013851354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023990804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388230703","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/mydzv","title":"Reproducibility in Management Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kelley School of Business, Indiana University; University of California, Irvine; University of California, San Diego; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nanjing Audit University; Université de Montpellier; Southeast University; Universiteit van Tilburg; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Universität Mannheim; Universität Hamburg; Business School, University of Auckland; Chinese University of Hong Kong; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Università degli Studi di Trento; Banca d'Italia; Universität zu Köln; Simon Fraser University; Università degli Studi di Padova; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Central University of Finance and Economics; Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz; Université de Strasbourg; Bangor University; Hunan Agricultural University; Aalto-Yliopisto; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Sungkyunkwan University; Technische Universität München; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Radboud Universiteit; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Deutsche Bundesbank; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Monash University; Fudan University; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Nanyang Technological University; National University of Singapore; La Trobe University; University of Warwick; University of Toronto; Morgan State University; University of Alberta; Copenhagen Business School; McGill University; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; Loyola Marymount University; Fundação Getulio Vargas; Universitetet i Stavanger; Masarykova Univerzita; Wilfrid Laurier University; North Carolina State University; Université du Luxembourg; Università degli Studi di Milano; Harvard University; University of Miami; University of Texas at Arlington; Science Foundation Ireland; Université de Lorraine; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Colorado Boulder; Boston College; Tel Aviv University; Universiteit Maastricht; University of New South Wales; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Technology Sydney; University of Southern California; University of Memphis; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Durham University; Central Michigan University; Carnegie Mellon University; Universiteit Utrecht; Toulouse School of Economics; Aarhus Universitet; University of Pennsylvania; Université de Lausanne; University College London; Purdue University; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Harvard Business School; York University; University of Portsmouth; San Diego State University; Universidad del Rosario; Central South University; Virginia Commonwealth University; Yale University","keywords":"Reproducibility; Computer science; Data science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.7775366978816028,"score_gpt":0.6558190457547928,"score_spread":0.12171765212681007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388230703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907497,0.00001932604,0.00028433386,0.0017908771,0.0003785577,0.00019269469,0.0000013048989,0.00006087212,0.2065223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722575,0.00005218533,0.0007832308,0.00006043858,0.000011659394,0.000009095839,3.09401e-7,0.0000024080864,0.026823152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845596,0.00008272749,0.00049472856,0.0026009013,0.0115858605,0.0006761662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936894,0.001242562,0.0000518582,0.003825076,0.0009461119,0.00024499788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2095039,0.00005844337,0.00012431349,0.13958137,0.00016770962,0.0015120576,0.003180042,0.00002284976,0.0007824729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08248641,0.000037506397,0.0000431165,0.6781989,0.0003185447,0.00057646626,0.0021219046,0.00009934088,0.0053659235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054097895,0.0000800233,0.5641461,0.0000036413264,0.0000012389173,0.00004806105,0.0000821309,0.00011829354,0.00063342217,0.015964825,0.02729772,0.39161915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116965384,0.000016151365,0.94378316,0.0000014754619,2.080579e-7,5.920317e-7,0.00044735233,0.005846474,0.00092918996,0.03828008,0.010519027,0.000059347123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007335249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017427072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5386175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120380966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008667217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388344927","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/jzwdt","title":"Not a Steamroller, a 3D Process: Scientization and the Bank of England","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Credibility; Ideal (ethics); Accounting; Ideal type; Business; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.5834776788050517,"score_gpt":0.5661851239874421,"score_spread":0.017292554817609607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388344927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387801,0.0020853935,0.024786584,0.0074003846,0.002773473,0.0024901305,0.00023165817,0.00011367704,0.021338582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855938,0.0008225561,0.0006139524,0.00008776839,0.00008115044,0.000053895394,0.000007781318,0.000013990518,0.012725136],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98566943,0.00039860207,0.0009999726,0.0010624574,0.01147437,0.00039518374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98399645,0.009030414,0.00061192963,0.0011404417,0.0050194515,0.00020129561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052581474,0.00018668949,0.00056712964,0.04914051,0.00024796926,0.0032485186,0.0030024922,0.00021579655,0.0003219485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070766434,0.0000884715,0.00016036654,0.13659376,0.0007542389,0.00020604822,0.0040237033,0.00045216002,0.00009201059],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020815812,0.0007640811,0.22387785,0.000963876,0.0004619259,0.00003211124,0.014113265,0.0094412565,0.000370794,0.022495257,0.064337574,0.66106045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0093444465,0.0003087287,0.12099263,0.00019295186,0.00007929981,0.000010430782,0.0029313806,0.60834265,0.0015216236,0.23997797,0.015478043,0.0008198398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022637079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082457926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6602406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029384753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047856645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388446498","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.15358","title":"The state of green open access in Canadian universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; Université de Montréal; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Work (physics); Political science; State (computer science); Open data; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.32939913352789746,"score_gpt":0.495047140516965,"score_spread":0.16564800698906756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388446498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731413,0.00012844866,0.000012040427,0.0074530947,0.00027655333,0.00009535528,0.00005616155,0.0000014508215,0.01883556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978379,0.00018783372,0.00004318102,0.00033054195,0.0000060102,2.6008703e-7,9.990086e-7,0.0000011171156,0.0015921409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749583,0.000050446462,0.0004909524,0.00007261965,0.0014809753,0.0004091975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970013,0.00055117084,0.00027211924,0.00016457029,0.00076074956,0.0012501226],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012396426,0.00004194149,0.00010207035,0.058045447,0.00049898156,0.009758317,0.005935178,0.000017713915,0.000114975446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028024686,0.000025735628,0.00002151174,0.112508856,0.000552304,0.025817472,0.00045926817,0.000120964534,0.000022148528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018502718,0.0000023234968,0.4960699,0.000006522921,0.0000046878704,0.000049399092,0.0052905385,0.0008956181,0.000006660567,0.014452123,0.037782133,0.44542158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015316193,0.00004179524,0.7837508,0.000012514539,3.7254634e-7,0.000009955408,0.005297517,0.0059843543,0.000060540537,0.0065614353,0.19807768,0.000049905728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4344666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46139503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4453717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012266474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019143572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388446687","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v46i2.15568","title":"Mapping information research in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Library science; Unit (ring theory); Mosaic; Field (mathematics); Citation; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Archaeology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.44227245791857944,"score_gpt":0.47936103258495616,"score_spread":0.03708857466637672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388446687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747819,0.000095492076,0.00018089154,0.007002772,0.0006714608,0.00010730021,0.000030017356,0.0000041480757,0.017126018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990465,0.00008379417,0.00016160247,0.0005476719,0.000016761764,7.8461653e-7,0.00000256883,0.0000011422534,0.00013919221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993535,0.00008568547,0.0008573768,0.00008341776,0.004868116,0.0005704348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958657,0.0008441218,0.00024925687,0.0001797825,0.0016866889,0.0011744526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023633625,0.000052177973,0.000117882395,0.12465682,0.0004309643,0.0043880497,0.0017957531,0.000030045883,0.00020089535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011829007,0.00003861946,0.000019863166,0.21719962,0.00028076046,0.026538722,0.00017877092,0.0003233754,0.00014388861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054405436,0.0000013432289,0.47724226,0.000010848291,0.0000012712634,0.00003291612,0.0029002945,0.0005633221,0.000008398365,0.0033351157,0.07552746,0.44037133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014602991,0.000025405743,0.6630431,0.000018358473,8.477607e-8,0.000024496238,0.013314032,0.013262264,0.00003328937,0.0019749205,0.3081028,0.000055244393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41856804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3519887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44031608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037433422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388465513","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00272","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publication; Publishing; Oligopoly; Library science; The Internet; Economics; Business; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Finance; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.8782480311744858,"score_gpt":0.6940854257892891,"score_spread":0.1841626053851967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388465513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82450324,0.004670235,0.00041805237,0.16595013,0.0014271403,0.0011106809,0.000044675424,0.000069503134,0.001806353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937676,0.0008880332,0.00041659578,0.00081591774,0.00011736194,0.00024966343,8.9131674e-7,0.00001278529,0.0037311283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861211,0.00043993234,0.0006188772,0.0014384952,0.009956274,0.0014253276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729512,0.018457236,0.00050623214,0.001166346,0.0064130733,0.00050596497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05136183,0.00023774507,0.00039714272,0.013309626,0.006047872,0.048708193,0.021159614,0.00005559207,0.00002690192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20162913,0.000103399696,0.00009158613,0.30180272,0.0041944147,0.009673412,0.013862465,0.0004937406,0.0007396236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010381703,0.00004647426,0.14800626,0.000010434972,0.00011454086,0.000013506898,0.052545764,0.00014671378,0.0050075892,0.023323182,0.29501998,0.47566172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003003211,0.00022332386,0.66328335,0.000064349166,0.000011847911,6.0009313e-7,0.19619341,0.0059183505,0.0044945097,0.10705925,0.022086212,0.00036447024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003412659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035676372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5152771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018315864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009211948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388500252","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2023.2281503","title":"The performance of bibliometric analyses in the health sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; China; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Pace; Biomedical sciences; Citation impact; Citation; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Pathology","score_opus":0.9614202202530888,"score_gpt":0.7944987910901559,"score_spread":0.16692142916293295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388500252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042600732,0.9960479,0.00001360152,0.0014957145,0.00093706313,0.00080844737,0.00002743235,0.0000071716013,0.00023664396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056311843,0.9989734,0.0000060680104,0.0000114961995,0.00023956703,0.00009157463,0.0000125111455,0.000010021546,0.000092231254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852663,0.0056914124,0.0025110338,0.0012094672,0.050202157,0.0018593115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87541765,0.11973229,0.0006969555,0.0011559356,0.0020680737,0.00092906354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2665892,0.00022925039,0.0011848857,0.3953161,0.0013588828,0.002367867,0.00866867,0.00020591245,0.00006378887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20539846,0.00008430016,0.000266305,0.84207547,0.0029964538,0.00025117796,0.0021534723,0.002231029,0.00016753373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037846098,0.0000838129,0.00043033788,0.0015773978,0.000007848251,0.0000015793083,0.000031368632,1.2821505e-7,7.329291e-9,0.00059057894,0.021217044,0.9760561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011135361,0.0007408076,0.0020592937,0.0042634164,0.0000026322527,0.00000699869,0.0002456717,0.00090169895,1.1141382e-7,0.00090233074,0.99067336,0.00009230223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016549791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034381203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97596383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012087805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004341407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388513251","doi":"10.1002/asi.24844","title":"Varieties of diffusion in academic publishing: How status and legitimacy influence growth trajectories of new innovations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Diffusion; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Economic geography; Demography; Demographic economics; History; Geography; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.2166630347796288,"score_gpt":0.467857612752969,"score_spread":0.2511945779733402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388513251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829416,0.00005465065,0.0003361434,0.016136216,0.00020264984,0.0001449375,0.000016150656,0.0000064145834,0.00016119036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992085,0.00037433626,0.0002463568,0.000047311427,0.000009732863,0.0000021195235,6.154386e-7,0.0000012233095,0.00010981009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478865,0.00003178314,0.0008769433,0.00009638459,0.00395407,0.00025214543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98428684,0.0015575999,0.0020353762,0.00014356052,0.011906447,0.00007016031],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021333428,0.00005346159,0.00020603006,0.038402036,0.00019472292,0.00085055595,0.0011397031,0.00014906265,0.0000010903526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23427078,0.000033356773,0.000032544995,0.14011459,0.0004031107,0.008788415,0.000417412,0.0003048144,4.8444616e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012091051,0.000009236908,0.903012,0.000010329495,0.000005012607,4.074255e-8,0.0015356555,0.00003316747,0.0031454274,0.06294078,0.0026267318,0.02666953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005865559,0.00010829493,0.87221396,0.000017311564,0.0000037052137,0.0000028490435,0.003856675,0.0009760773,0.0046058074,0.112240545,0.005343189,0.00004504333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038725982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006828313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21293736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015240295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008289877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97249687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388654272","doi":"10.7202/1076465ar","title":"Le libre accès, une priorité pour la recherche en santé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Health science; Library science; Humanities; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy; Medical education","score_opus":0.8871116099295135,"score_gpt":0.7314124304147316,"score_spread":0.15569917951478196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388654272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2698537,0.06420117,0.00086314365,0.5279623,0.0033307103,0.00066227786,0.000024015488,0.00003031851,0.13307232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90407765,0.024295798,0.05353855,0.0005098686,0.0002116015,0.000003122627,8.657043e-7,0.000018466924,0.017344056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864466,0.0033010822,0.00097470166,0.0012973653,0.0066312794,0.0013489333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96110713,0.03244377,0.002161263,0.0008904934,0.002312858,0.0010845084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1639658,0.0002106621,0.00055292156,0.016267791,0.00088116864,0.003322215,0.0026043197,0.00039508333,0.00018147928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07836198,0.00017578245,0.0000864073,0.11771995,0.0022099472,0.0053510685,0.0005395597,0.0013888,0.00023692564],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036928017,0.00053452456,0.006743381,0.00013430596,0.0000061283286,0.0000037129998,0.004507852,0.000007688365,0.0019999526,0.016931552,0.008864043,0.96022993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022138653,0.0026227117,0.281633,0.002951316,0.000040355237,0.0003282611,0.07353228,0.025747765,0.0024660102,0.17872858,0.42889044,0.0008454266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035604541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047246496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005599529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017419768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99771243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388658322","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.7366","title":"The neglect of equity and inclusion in open science policies of Europe and the Americas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Openness to experience; Equity (law); Incentive; Political science; Public relations; Public policy; Transparency (behavior); Ethos; Science policy; Objectivity (philosophy); Open science; Inclusion (mineral); Neglect; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.7099295677185388,"score_gpt":0.6538960585412826,"score_spread":0.056033509177256136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388658322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355154,0.0025332284,0.00040640117,0.016202705,0.00037907079,0.0011739562,0.000033504653,0.000009192788,0.04374654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076194,0.0075858193,0.00026694537,0.00011773198,0.000011589619,0.000010919104,3.1408075e-7,0.0000059091008,0.0012388094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857217,0.00065948407,0.0010391976,0.00088348007,0.01120099,0.0004951468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773205,0.017630694,0.0006437918,0.0014271977,0.00281226,0.00016556206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10894252,0.00013287134,0.00051359856,0.025665797,0.0011723231,0.004170323,0.015913391,0.00006770016,0.00001738114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10496042,0.000052652293,0.000056770612,0.18414375,0.005889759,0.00026749066,0.52651805,0.00040274544,0.000004126305],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027387624,0.00012331168,0.06600565,0.00005197051,0.000022967302,0.0000050233107,0.005921481,0.00019502809,0.0042675147,0.056480967,0.003972404,0.86267984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085186976,0.0001712535,0.56487834,0.000067138935,0.000006784982,0.0000033843005,0.001812702,0.019912018,0.001964675,0.40700397,0.0031453413,0.00018253717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014078588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006167319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86249727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043493612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007682139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388851052","doi":"10.1002/asi.24852","title":"The decrease in uncited articles and its effect on the concentration of citations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.20225363668285168,"score_gpt":0.48218410740754425,"score_spread":0.27993047072469257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388851052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777452,0.000048354505,0.000057444046,0.02146923,0.00017142508,0.00024182875,0.00000642467,0.0000042728907,0.0002558378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999736,0.000093724535,0.0000138249425,0.00009037648,0.000006032454,0.0000071152926,1.8205232e-7,7.52073e-7,0.0000519967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996307,0.00009879429,0.00054134626,0.00006496532,0.002807683,0.00018021373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859705,0.008291154,0.0009329929,0.00014536854,0.004609943,0.000050046656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04063336,0.000038103935,0.00009696258,0.008245004,0.0005600778,0.00057876314,0.0007876801,0.000052501902,0.0000013535935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22826537,0.000015566971,0.000032505577,0.07203114,0.0002487827,0.0011028645,0.00013180339,0.00013568945,0.0000055936694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114363196,0.000047961566,0.42123926,0.000010193347,0.000032898475,4.421067e-7,0.0019473666,0.0005072628,0.011086654,0.29706132,0.011802135,0.25615016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016681366,0.0007969904,0.73380077,0.000038776598,0.000016137701,0.000011907273,0.005706922,0.10000037,0.04311464,0.10031005,0.014427559,0.00010775811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021866533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005248946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3125615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011806785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023153894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98786986},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4388890968","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.11140","title":"The state of OAI-PMH repositories in Canadian Universities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; World Wide Web; Computer science; Rendering (computer graphics); State (computer science); Data science","score_opus":0.5636661843411337,"score_gpt":0.3948142269604985,"score_spread":0.1688519573806352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388890968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894468,0.00021439051,0.00060788856,0.00042802232,0.0015691009,0.00026826203,0.00025106012,0.00003182292,0.007182612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96319324,0.00093012553,0.000019091385,0.000010510573,0.000032218053,4.2639863e-7,0.000007433584,0.000013321326,0.03579364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957528,0.00039866797,0.00051871565,0.0009889643,0.0015084425,0.0008323981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913829,0.0040480634,0.00042460932,0.0014711405,0.0021326488,0.0005406347],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097484635,0.00020694626,0.0003929135,0.041779824,0.000418828,0.00096390385,0.0046515455,0.00020982829,0.000046002984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043943175,0.00016442816,0.00022486884,0.094446756,0.0005380256,0.00029808833,0.0026304561,0.0006784715,0.0001658387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019465324,0.00009800183,0.7366555,0.00006297204,0.00019350369,0.0025425027,0.0013602542,0.17202266,0.000032175216,0.06495633,0.015408152,0.0064733117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087700295,0.00018450579,0.42839202,0.00013989588,0.000047714206,0.000004456502,0.012734238,0.1345466,0.00036568215,0.38351697,0.03822973,0.0009611941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37499446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39901382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31856063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011645672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031661806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389036243","doi":"10.1037/cap0000381.supp","title":"Supplemental Material for Research Productivity Norms Among Canadian I–O Psychology Scholars","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Productivity; Applied psychology; Social science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.7213815080196927,"score_gpt":0.6299912255496735,"score_spread":0.09139028247001924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389036243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90517306,0.0001454534,0.0000765542,0.04705721,0.013202536,0.0027220699,0.0077917418,0.00018359175,0.023647794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860963,0.0001476875,0.0005683444,0.004365843,0.00093893945,0.0008116682,0.0010187359,0.00013521143,0.005917224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98016953,0.0013324727,0.0016674238,0.0043686903,0.003388437,0.009073461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97979695,0.0022825662,0.0003287141,0.0041389186,0.0045573087,0.008895517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06461566,0.0006882073,0.0009966294,0.11653491,0.0025568737,0.002267171,0.008443575,0.0012460599,0.008016376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035959184,0.0006258089,0.0003976326,0.12883073,0.0021144182,0.0010666129,0.00044030536,0.0019103627,0.0036941085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105856634,0.00007730358,0.095442295,0.000007638801,0.000064275126,0.0005171524,0.0002653494,0.0000115788725,0.00085401244,0.0012931767,0.8300943,0.0712671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011307163,0.00053700636,0.43897498,0.000007752324,0.000008060964,0.000072039606,0.0005976786,0.000096823416,0.00006223441,0.021548396,0.5364318,0.0005324923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77192867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99379224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34353268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029901152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003979631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389045464","doi":"10.1038/s41561-023-01315-y","title":"Collaboration between women helps close the gender gap in ice core science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Geoscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Closing (real estate); Publishing; Core (optical fiber); Women in science; Ice core; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Geology; Climatology; Demographic economics; Engineering; Gender studies; Economics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.5513996505730159,"score_gpt":0.594976695241037,"score_spread":0.04357704466802115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389045464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892757,0.00032636028,0.00021558243,0.003892232,0.0013329696,0.000421515,0.000056717956,0.00006229378,0.004416644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633723,0.0000988731,0.00022336908,0.00064985076,0.00015027377,0.000036315963,0.0000033033716,0.000008013873,0.0024927552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97906244,0.00022152132,0.0006450532,0.001451358,0.01703085,0.001588767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960835,0.0047964132,0.00025695254,0.0013460336,0.0034631926,0.0005290647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07133667,0.00018413208,0.00027645286,0.043223847,0.0012156984,0.004290005,0.007487312,0.0002481365,0.00012471444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07683225,0.00010664193,0.000059981485,0.58196086,0.0015199287,0.0018816894,0.0016292832,0.0010312594,0.00078779407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026315596,0.0000981191,0.88076615,0.000009177341,0.0000047672083,0.000052763793,0.0044542034,0.000271997,0.0074756476,0.017393056,0.024695186,0.06475262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024085665,0.000072765055,0.9292003,0.000005314209,0.000001269378,0.000003436479,0.0033873655,0.0065305317,0.00033233175,0.0340619,0.025973855,0.00019008156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062018626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006218021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.538737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048002135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014840113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389140112","doi":"10.1038/d41586-023-03762-4","title":"Why is China’s high-quality research footprint becoming more introverted?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Index (typography); Footprint; Quality (philosophy); Regional science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6603088369012983,"score_gpt":0.6626146868126132,"score_spread":0.0023058499113148834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389140112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8858826,0.00085736567,0.0002503474,0.1042827,0.001555808,0.00037863146,0.00011250858,0.00014012813,0.006539912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875944,0.0002005382,0.00045887465,0.0030968457,0.00031877722,0.0000191653,0.000014618949,0.000022442742,0.008274282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752442,0.0007122367,0.0007162945,0.0012994357,0.020736976,0.001290862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98549956,0.007460719,0.00016950013,0.0017240434,0.0045731585,0.0005730437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05619988,0.0001965945,0.0004128512,0.06373356,0.0007001014,0.0027863672,0.004328465,0.0013355433,0.0011381538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09286384,0.00013524148,0.00028428077,0.31600454,0.0002780962,0.00036388868,0.0027038187,0.0057933535,0.0015460786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032794298,0.00008031797,0.015390136,0.000010659548,0.000023271145,0.000039202037,0.0004507934,0.000016834196,0.0020751373,0.0071839783,0.855239,0.119457915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043923728,0.00008265933,0.57901585,0.00001064845,0.00000229855,0.0000029327891,0.0008113259,0.0014044453,0.0034582147,0.056319743,0.35824585,0.00020683401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010274731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094401956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5636257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023471266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023566319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389153991","doi":"10.1522/rhe.v7i3.1539","title":"Les soutiens et les formations à la prise de notes offerts dans les cégeps au Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue hybride de l éducation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.639811325736357,"score_gpt":0.5586751283971906,"score_spread":0.08113619733916644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389153991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100432,0.0022542751,0.041012604,0.03743002,0.0011275752,0.0003902646,0.00021027813,0.00011877634,0.007413007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96837693,0.0018428172,0.0019405697,0.00011507039,0.00030190268,0.00007736914,0.000089772526,0.000038219612,0.02721733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937844,0.0011520449,0.00091287686,0.0007012438,0.0023115976,0.0011377846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841051,0.012445816,0.0004131989,0.0008377739,0.001611396,0.0005867132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018306945,0.00027601412,0.0003529009,0.021163363,0.0011294287,0.0020103727,0.0014023755,0.0003027503,0.0003157528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05427016,0.000265543,0.0002813958,0.060557663,0.00036559155,0.0009962873,0.000443692,0.00060613884,0.0010026657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015115199,0.00036346668,0.35004836,0.00020890746,0.000039324896,0.000039171806,0.051374592,0.0026157198,0.0013368423,0.009734563,0.029478518,0.55474544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028820746,0.00009407314,0.7102165,0.0002025097,0.000049785012,0.00016156261,0.013851378,0.058439225,0.0015727552,0.0037573895,0.21097295,0.00039363006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18798867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060230006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5543518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024382165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004550117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389206729","doi":"10.1037/cap0000381","title":"Research productivity norms among Canadian I–O psychology scholars.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Productivity; Social psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7676042837253434,"score_gpt":0.6396129518071805,"score_spread":0.12799133191816292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389206729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79602027,0.00061446545,0.0000447866,0.050455227,0.008734817,0.0013527641,0.0007142578,0.0002623477,0.14180106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97803336,0.00044589283,0.00022152101,0.007123642,0.000671533,0.00030289215,0.00015124204,0.00013592055,0.012914001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97507304,0.0023745815,0.0018215132,0.0052312156,0.0051945746,0.010305062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97056985,0.0028054987,0.00036576483,0.006552967,0.0063287886,0.013377135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.084249,0.000796624,0.0011485249,0.18675442,0.0027720253,0.0024212664,0.011761087,0.0016981589,0.005173264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060290996,0.00071051094,0.00041883532,0.27308348,0.0030874638,0.0013789466,0.00059859816,0.0042371773,0.020094253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003469813,0.00007333258,0.20688245,0.000004654566,0.0000564144,0.0016938444,0.0002991071,0.000030713338,0.00019960107,0.0013819551,0.6673538,0.12198945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005983875,0.0002780554,0.5474822,0.000010043183,0.000005610763,0.00010533417,0.00053324865,0.00010640608,0.000012678739,0.021793926,0.42855498,0.00051911914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8608775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34059978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033056121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005574097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389210846","doi":"10.13003/tyad9xtruc","title":"“Who Cares?” Defining Citation Style in Scholarly Journals by Vincas Grigas and Pavla Vizváry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Style (visual arts); Confusion; Publishing; Library science; Identifier; History; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Archaeology","score_opus":0.8151392922615274,"score_gpt":0.6461948723136283,"score_spread":0.1689444199478991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389210846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54462516,0.09147413,0.0021268316,0.0029863792,0.0075335796,0.0015996511,0.0010403778,0.0002352473,0.34837863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5924782,0.0943606,0.0014508507,0.00046166833,0.00064398977,0.00010308795,0.00023841504,0.00021905366,0.3100441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647147,0.0006276672,0.0021762953,0.0016175389,0.029819911,0.0010438869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751821,0.011131507,0.0010101905,0.00092980097,0.01095836,0.00078803307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.096562065,0.00038640853,0.0010141208,0.16119722,0.0003966124,0.020872053,0.002251942,0.00075683405,0.00083337014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19478887,0.00027661055,0.00023079311,0.23683876,0.00016156673,0.0023914182,0.0013972503,0.0018238084,0.00061493256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711633,0.000055447334,0.1526279,0.0000364928,0.00003398433,0.00017608896,0.00018624405,0.0000075420453,0.00026510336,0.00018454542,0.68579453,0.16062139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012856142,0.0004323556,0.38818264,0.00056814845,0.000036116373,0.00015875304,0.0041576535,0.0022111428,0.00035634692,0.011091043,0.59020203,0.0013181416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030230791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007898597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23555474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006582392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020476975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389222850","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2023-e004en","title":"THE GROWING CHALLENGE OF PREDATORY PUBLISHING: A CALL FOR ACTION","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Call to action; Publishing; Action (physics); Business; Political science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.9375746485619034,"score_gpt":0.6677774440568481,"score_spread":0.2697972045050553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389222850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7629152,0.0075797373,0.030795936,0.06389496,0.009293336,0.0053952406,0.00074000855,0.0010188903,0.11836667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98350894,0.0003895404,0.00013949946,0.0002408713,0.00021539578,0.000108840504,0.000016655034,0.00002647093,0.015353775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913312,0.0003148665,0.001044,0.0007365824,0.005697266,0.0008760913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827333,0.012053036,0.00041562688,0.0011358217,0.0033420976,0.00032009918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03292056,0.00019007311,0.0003738439,0.016231656,0.0006555085,0.0040707765,0.0033178998,0.00018318601,0.00020970145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05460835,0.00011958151,0.00032550527,0.060903635,0.00025521964,0.0038826028,0.0009333427,0.0003750428,0.00033669668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007309716,0.00006419717,0.0012216374,0.000020614965,0.00003757822,0.0000065178247,0.00040315217,0.000025472753,0.0019218113,0.015735343,0.27348697,0.7070036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007958592,0.00020042784,0.020132558,0.00001315614,0.000009267785,0.0000019357294,0.0016719372,0.011329731,0.0009594803,0.015853884,0.948839,0.00019274643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012024222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011212467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70681083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011499481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025063363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389309117","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1684","title":"Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Queen's University","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Publishing; Inclusion (mineral); Evidence-based practice; Best evidence; Critical appraisal; Qualitative research; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Medical education; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9866112398185908,"score_gpt":0.8221297151216669,"score_spread":0.1644815246969239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389309117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6495919,0.2631735,0.027990356,0.027188322,0.00044255517,0.030678159,0.0002994985,0.00011770543,0.00051797484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485409,0.022482244,0.0246097,0.000020392046,0.00008151276,0.0029725053,5.24436e-7,0.000058327154,0.0012338946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5612597,0.386266,0.006337558,0.0041600983,0.037466552,0.0045101303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08855725,0.8844719,0.0027512193,0.0022559352,0.02058237,0.0013813229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8245599,0.00032661806,0.0021477467,0.05746787,0.001624346,0.0031530885,0.0030391389,0.00017402701,0.000060766757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9212538,0.00019842054,0.00025102877,0.10780317,0.0018171862,0.0015905375,0.0023888892,0.0010578762,0.000029491914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010878394,0.0016511744,0.008074489,0.04768666,0.0014109814,0.000035092882,0.2202984,0.000016955273,0.011944195,0.0014264155,0.027212977,0.6791548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044505278,0.0024252643,0.010726812,0.013907735,0.000043375883,0.000013624283,0.9374943,0.007904987,0.0037832248,0.02092237,0.001988144,0.00034514125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006337473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000350275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71719587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043830532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016363261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996754},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389398895","doi":"10.1503/cjs.007022","title":"The impact of Canadian-produced research on the global orthopedic literature: a bibliometric analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Orthopedic surgery; Productivity; Impact factor; Bibliometrics; Quartile; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Demography; Library science; Economic growth; Internal medicine; Surgery; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.7818306891012017,"score_gpt":0.6031174757098267,"score_spread":0.17871321339137503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389398895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808776,0.00562656,0.0000055609253,0.009742912,0.00087437936,0.00014496002,0.0003281043,0.000003578819,0.002396348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966933,0.0023089543,0.0000045363413,0.00007848992,0.00020876573,0.000003509309,0.000005172114,0.000010895219,0.0006863362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854998,0.001502283,0.0013404621,0.0004297326,0.009529578,0.0016981222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368261,0.04126675,0.00069347717,0.0015071193,0.015853189,0.0038533306],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13691798,0.00018137539,0.00060306117,0.882373,0.0012935381,0.0047866222,0.0037159047,0.00015625027,0.0005321177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20494907,0.000081328115,0.0012500801,0.9812961,0.00054088887,0.00041931917,0.00012212628,0.0009414971,0.00014958541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018206956,0.000009438511,0.5857976,0.0000013854,0.00025857685,0.00047387544,0.00006228143,0.00032576255,0.000006146736,0.00037945952,0.37514964,0.037517626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007047047,0.000113590366,0.96968186,0.00002572067,0.000021756998,0.000042726853,0.00038307218,0.00042993115,0.0000232723,0.0026566153,0.026452105,0.00009890643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31122383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3085548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38388425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010574074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01659611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389473801","doi":"10.1002/agt2.474","title":"From bud to blossom: The incredible journey of <i>Aggregate</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aggregate","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Impact factor; Citation; Directory; Scopus; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Computer science; Political science; Nanotechnology; Physics; Materials science; Law","score_opus":0.5095492356721106,"score_gpt":0.5414667035550386,"score_spread":0.03191746788292793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389473801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98120123,0.0008720158,0.00041635355,0.010431466,0.0010393437,0.00029731338,0.0001756208,0.00006917444,0.0054974905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941416,0.00066262094,0.00039104256,0.00059145875,0.00029959576,0.000018669027,0.00000915122,0.00002081377,0.008592484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933583,0.00030241895,0.00084509596,0.00070430397,0.0080343755,0.0007779621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98910815,0.0066490113,0.0003743773,0.0014970974,0.0018503844,0.0005210098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016872073,0.00017504148,0.00039298605,0.023953395,0.00032288325,0.0013789345,0.0043192566,0.00010691639,0.00075774675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022820532,0.000096811484,0.00021186417,0.23249277,0.00021680426,0.00037608063,0.0017238985,0.0003000177,0.006690468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008332394,0.00011172305,0.056635592,0.000006367226,0.0000798592,0.00010042016,0.0015494083,0.00048516452,0.016144242,0.0013211318,0.7004679,0.22301488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013750783,0.00043745767,0.13297132,0.000121256584,0.000030562856,0.000015287567,0.0021419097,0.0074811378,0.108562715,0.10544619,0.64080226,0.0006148359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015944375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007831585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22240004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045173947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018379245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389510776","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47343-2_16","title":"Grey Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Grey literature; Layperson; Flexibility (engineering); Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.7387218652187281,"score_gpt":0.5889666273153269,"score_spread":0.14975523790340117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389510776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013401915,0.0014223789,0.00023583452,0.0010241381,0.001594897,0.00019778588,0.00017367079,0.00012231934,0.9952156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003460889,0.0016180589,0.00027317027,0.00025485823,0.0003363791,0.0000034680743,0.000035161516,0.000049492366,0.9970833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98104626,0.000035352317,0.0007810772,0.0012020904,0.016398294,0.00053690135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680127,0.0044320812,0.00026244577,0.0014891241,0.006505854,0.0005092264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137309525,0.00030100756,0.000513577,0.15104131,0.00016477672,0.0080365585,0.0036636537,0.0006604635,0.011919865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023429288,0.00018177742,0.0004358974,0.09738728,0.00013306252,0.00038860406,0.0014566777,0.00084056193,0.047026046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033650447,0.0000056209255,0.00009469001,0.000004109375,0.00001658281,0.00013343841,0.000018697388,7.0893924e-7,0.000003513476,0.3137173,0.5673228,0.11867915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064756445,0.00003980215,0.00035612032,0.000026740163,0.000002901325,0.0000059455633,0.0000064274045,0.00009555059,0.0000057672323,0.3251764,0.6740363,0.00018329996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000763233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016405005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11849585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007367681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019185219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389547294","doi":"10.1038/s43856-023-00418-2","title":"A bibliometric analysis of geographic disparities in the authorship of leading medical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Citation; Bibliometrics; Publication; Medical journal; Library science; Geography; Scopus; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Regional science; Medicine; Demography; MEDLINE; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8156671707673102,"score_gpt":0.6660387258024996,"score_spread":0.14962844496481065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389547294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503313,0.012081247,0.0008881981,0.03130213,0.00010430937,0.00012566987,0.000017335684,0.000012533688,0.005137308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984456,0.015156836,0.00010002562,0.00011547908,0.000016692162,0.000014954315,0.000016221136,0.000003769026,0.00011999074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861872,0.0012813462,0.0014379165,0.00022276059,0.010546784,0.00032399912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535002,0.040832944,0.00054995547,0.002818174,0.0020804943,0.00021821144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.103559375,0.000076806595,0.0005566597,0.8329811,0.00018184146,0.00015601421,0.008367079,0.00010532243,0.0005846008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1926526,0.000042793283,0.00019929717,0.9695321,0.0012256884,0.00018011051,0.0010112891,0.00048764053,0.00002060458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003832819,0.000104082574,0.94194317,0.0000074764607,0.00009987277,0.0000024363424,0.0007163965,0.00004498337,0.000074636046,0.0061339294,0.0041351058,0.046734054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020048743,0.00005891856,0.9653607,0.000054127675,0.00007702192,0.0000020183427,0.0014666049,0.024183469,0.000016995045,0.007094647,0.0014440481,0.00004095841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081343995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036828773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13655095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016019254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117880605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389610381","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.11.571170","title":"Best Paper awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Publication; Best practice; Diversity (politics); Political science; Discipline; Public relations; Open science; Library science; Accounting; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4282145735138333,"score_gpt":0.5011596080532705,"score_spread":0.07294503453943724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389610381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543427,0.0019048355,0.015376326,0.006698914,0.008359462,0.007235165,0.004999888,0.00049474323,0.0005879472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905355,0.00084273913,0.007074161,0.0003483243,0.0002955634,0.00042781956,5.297458e-7,0.00010787652,0.00036749753],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98426765,0.00022028216,0.001386203,0.003582295,0.008943064,0.0016004839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844713,0.00235553,0.00068908435,0.0032220555,0.007893834,0.0013681686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05090374,0.0005981154,0.0010794977,0.030999912,0.001226428,0.013813243,0.014198526,0.0005678399,0.0002285487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031350598,0.00050755835,0.00024231213,0.09191476,0.0011993579,0.0017222615,0.018865727,0.00086962903,0.0003936099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002988569,0.0019592624,0.404288,0.0012044281,0.00038303962,0.00034585243,0.00019164951,0.00024415113,0.5251052,0.014755207,0.04989209,0.0013323113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020859805,0.00065320707,0.81852514,0.00031562726,0.00012134888,8.7944294e-8,0.000039243558,0.004924908,0.054833304,0.0009928838,0.11526283,0.0022454588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035880652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003702978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47027186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045040628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005127384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389686822","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2","title":"The oligopoly of open access publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Publishing; Oligopoly; Open access publishing; Business; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.9066864170215745,"score_gpt":0.7241775974229555,"score_spread":0.18250881959861898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389686822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7497893,0.0024032756,0.0032381653,0.019262308,0.008582635,0.0014711408,0.00021479266,0.00020250896,0.21483585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97830695,0.00081431237,0.00033218096,0.00020694082,0.00010084205,0.000025624311,0.0000073275023,0.00001793415,0.020187883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669818,0.00041244665,0.0013644554,0.0011218992,0.028655633,0.0014637352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95562476,0.029013252,0.0008841434,0.0026327188,0.010955939,0.0008891784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1524852,0.00016712047,0.0003863936,0.2333492,0.0012678143,0.12072442,0.0473551,0.00012539931,0.00029290468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41767758,0.00009280769,0.00019840438,0.87874407,0.0006257634,0.010709695,0.024871178,0.00039567484,0.00084839825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013767795,0.00006238958,0.13712224,0.0000040808736,0.000013315817,0.000006398117,0.00012559544,0.00009296977,0.00023998287,0.0143311685,0.44987464,0.39811343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048141307,0.000085784435,0.45964444,0.000007703983,0.000004261295,0.0000028797638,0.00074663264,0.007529027,0.0019171395,0.0464995,0.48287025,0.00021098809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004285221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052505944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64539486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014828765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000686739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389748324","doi":"10.51983/ajist-2019.9.2.262","title":"Research Productivity of Life Sciences from 2014-2016: A Scientometric Study through Web of Science Database","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Productivity; Publication; Library science; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Publishing; Biological sciences; Life span; Database; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Gerontology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.35904375318580745,"score_gpt":0.5526774208282079,"score_spread":0.19363366764240048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389748324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99022967,0.00055522734,0.0005711748,0.0016542922,0.000627041,0.00048823617,0.000028497903,0.000008901452,0.005836976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645424,0.00018817722,0.0032831838,0.000023273673,0.000023063867,0.0000027146864,2.6356543e-7,0.0000027307424,0.000022329004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707252,0.00022839129,0.0020004276,0.00067503913,0.02551396,0.00085699663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96143097,0.0016465297,0.0021104792,0.001243778,0.033161484,0.00040676986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15426002,0.00014716832,0.00059554307,0.2314118,0.000880741,0.0011075072,0.008172796,0.00009874956,0.00011710166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13594788,0.00009464367,0.00006321004,0.5235268,0.01751316,0.017371874,0.0024740908,0.0006215375,0.000086955915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008218361,0.0007657596,0.76100314,0.000026222342,0.00002187932,0.000003733413,0.0031314855,0.00003933195,0.044425607,0.012067411,0.002375851,0.1760574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003978905,0.0097479895,0.5590134,0.0001993682,0.000024718009,0.00012511326,0.27732053,0.005133591,0.106631204,0.029158577,0.008083457,0.00058310287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093904746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048521533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.292115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015493843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010442376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389765078","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0293080","title":"Disciplinary gender balance, research productivity, and recognition of men and women in academia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Discipline; Gender balance; Field (mathematics); Gender gap; Women in science; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.8517999871879728,"score_gpt":0.5856706198714842,"score_spread":0.2661293673164886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389765078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931121,0.00033193975,0.0000024595556,0.0012726358,0.000017385262,0.0003230202,0.000028806153,0.0000134076,0.0048982566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637437,0.0011412284,0.00018401019,0.0000062282593,0.000044464836,0.00005315019,0.000003415438,0.0000070615506,0.0021860588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916942,0.00040941892,0.00037585077,0.00063216215,0.0062461877,0.0006421587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949542,0.0033534486,0.000075359676,0.000312829,0.0010513314,0.00025282672],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046547983,0.0000700451,0.00027204823,0.038782164,0.00012497013,0.00030289893,0.0004997293,0.00018349942,0.00008844599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025206925,0.00005332185,0.00001398758,0.12615304,0.0002902738,0.00046045354,0.0014040199,0.0007473665,0.000090809364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076797674,0.00059097685,0.9092447,0.000104124476,0.000025693189,0.000011361272,0.0028077655,9.991776e-7,0.032219063,0.00004678529,0.002694086,0.052177608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028807373,0.00016949105,0.89766073,0.000036068155,0.000002052674,0.0000010185745,0.0018584119,0.0024204717,0.004789908,0.092642486,0.000049283884,0.00008201864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002463469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004455272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092595704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007754553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007957027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98300415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389786568","doi":"10.1186/s13643-023-02410-2","title":"Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Guideline; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Medicine; Scopus; Process (computing); Bibliometrics; Data science; Computer science; Management science; Library science; Psychology; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.7241108159152894,"score_gpt":0.6179719659443282,"score_spread":0.10613884997096112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389786568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079014085,0.61244315,0.081806,0.020640364,0.022294277,0.1700873,0.0009310783,0.00048094481,0.012302809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4747724,0.25054976,0.10466994,0.006810553,0.005130322,0.037737053,0.0011071055,0.00068024494,0.11854261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95930165,0.0034981621,0.021621851,0.0013390244,0.013165121,0.0010741779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94598085,0.016439129,0.02419077,0.0053489073,0.007377742,0.00066262716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30402443,0.00039276018,0.0031086341,0.3693186,0.0003526997,0.0013466271,0.0047397395,0.00023282757,0.00015487136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68068177,0.00016568825,0.0016642107,0.89886045,0.0001831617,0.00056143914,0.0012682425,0.00029456834,0.0006429006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012068804,0.000114052025,0.0024249258,0.03509367,0.000033903045,0.0000116743395,0.00027098387,0.0000017677099,0.000920639,0.000100867604,0.9187132,0.04230223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006258288,0.00042187297,0.004296261,0.015031957,0.00011291822,0.00007117442,0.00030227817,0.006154674,0.00018412706,0.0034818898,0.96895295,0.0003640869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012878002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018533232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52954185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094898984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021897434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969006},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4390095083","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104938","title":"The interdependent influence of lobbying and intellectual capital on new drug development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Interdependence; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Criticism; Social capital; Industrial organization; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Sample (material); Economics; Biotechnology; Law","score_opus":0.731170739857711,"score_gpt":0.6596370523479049,"score_spread":0.07153368750980604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390095083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906028,0.00029607624,0.000048810216,0.004342723,0.00006497754,0.00023281688,0.0000047773665,0.000019875713,0.004387129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881135,0.0007431098,0.000057875717,0.000049525763,0.00010437021,0.000009767534,6.6081753e-7,0.000009711581,0.010911461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98572725,0.0007331829,0.0005900731,0.0005164858,0.011399623,0.0010333603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628907,0.032869842,0.00011034965,0.00078407663,0.0025962398,0.0007488288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05187302,0.000106582534,0.0001733825,0.04814566,0.0007379619,0.0017117886,0.002580343,0.00004602405,0.00006610871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20017387,0.00006046615,0.00005600177,0.13163185,0.0005189168,0.00021292114,0.002909349,0.0005229724,0.0017853465],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060586266,0.000051766132,0.0056198887,0.000010669945,0.000024218836,0.00001888205,0.0121386,0.00022694751,0.0011045067,0.0073430277,0.118251346,0.85514957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010497461,0.00065674685,0.5703473,0.00013525215,0.0000016922694,0.000016097272,0.017733408,0.0032478806,0.020172171,0.055237614,0.33099216,0.00040992367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011633337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85473967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023421075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015304761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993245},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4390104160","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556","title":"Reproducibility in <i>Management Science</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Binghamton University; University of California, Los Angeles; Business School, University of Auckland; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Southern University of Science and Technology; Hunan Agricultural University; Libera Università di Bolzano; Universidad del Rosario; Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg; Toulouse School of Economics; Deutsche Bundesbank; Université de Montpellier; Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Southeast University; Universität zu Köln; Agricultural University of Athens; Universität Mannheim; Università degli Studi di Verona; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Università Bocconi; Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Göteborgs Universitet; Danmarks Tekniske Universitet; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Chinese University of Hong Kong; Zhejiang University; Shanghai University of Finance and Economics; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Universiteit Gent; Tel Aviv University; Dartmouth College; Università degli Studi di Trento; Banca d'Italia; Lunds Universitet; University of California, Irvine; Universität Wien; Université de Strasbourg; Bangor University; University of California, San Diego; Southern Methodist University; Aalto-Yliopisto; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Loyola Marymount University; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Masarykova Univerzita; Université de Fribourg; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Washington University in St. Louis; Monash University; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Universität Zürich; National University of Singapore; La Trobe University; University of Oxford; University of Colorado Boulder; University College London; University of Warwick; Universität Hamburg; University of East Anglia; York University; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Copenhagen Business School; Fudan University; Aarhus Universitet; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg; Universidad del Atlántico; Fundação Getulio Vargas; Universitetet i Stavanger; Deakin University; Science Foundation Ireland; University of Cyprus; University of Texas at Arlington; Wilfrid Laurier University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Purdue University; Universiteit Utrecht; Temple University; Universität St. Gallen; University of Technology Sydney; Santa Clara University; Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz; Technische Universität München; Central South University; Virginia Commonwealth University; San Diego State University; Nanjing Audit University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; University of Portsmouth; Universiteit van Tilburg; Yale University; Nanyang Technological University; Shandong University; Universität Rostock; Università degli Studi di Milano; Universität Innsbruck; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Johns Hopkins University; North Carolina State University; Université du Luxembourg; Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem; Kelley School of Business, Indiana University; Microsoft Research; Université de Lorraine; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; McGill University; University of Southern California; University of Memphis; Durham University; Singapore Management University; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Central Michigan University; Università degli Studi di Padova; James Madison University; Augusta University; Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Georgetown University; University of South Carolina; KU Leuven; Universiteit Maastricht; Brigham Young University; University of New South Wales; University of Bern; University of Pittsburgh; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; Simon Fraser University; University of Connecticut; Université de Lausanne; Boston College; University of Miami; Harvard University; Carnegie Mellon University; Radboud Universiteit; Texas Tech University; Florida Atlantic University; University of Pennsylvania; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; Northwestern University; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Harvard Business School; Central University of Finance and Economics; Sungkyunkwan University; Emory University; University of Toronto; Imperial College London; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology; University of Alberta; Morgan State University","keywords":"Reproducibility; Computer science; Management science; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","score_opus":0.5718768911711274,"score_gpt":0.5872786213728848,"score_spread":0.015401730201757391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390104160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67024666,0.00004577918,0.00068684213,0.002376001,0.0014722685,0.00092491123,0.000004145312,0.00016706948,0.32407632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98129594,0.00019344548,0.0018567798,0.00021634743,0.000027510041,0.00005519972,8.9346076e-7,0.000008251685,0.01634564],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96583295,0.00012123797,0.0009682887,0.005932161,0.025138939,0.00200641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083924,0.0005774828,0.00019117682,0.0067189327,0.0010983609,0.0005748163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26012322,0.00019725395,0.0002820684,0.13428907,0.0011118728,0.0047055753,0.011625008,0.000034811226,0.00025492217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022904295,0.00014933638,0.00009176011,0.67048466,0.0030537802,0.002437595,0.0089535955,0.00021557944,0.004031233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002162383,0.00033346826,0.29644424,0.000042583943,0.000007760466,0.0002849424,0.0003693564,0.0014406221,0.0017700107,0.0708856,0.02307194,0.60532784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038675018,0.000048157795,0.9219326,0.0000160358,0.0000028915954,0.0000016798114,0.0015143725,0.010866212,0.001056335,0.035856817,0.028071282,0.00024690092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058436504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012960952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62548834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056554266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017356544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390235107","doi":"10.18280/ijdne.180606","title":"Global Trends in Poliomyelitis Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1857–2019","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Qassim University","keywords":"Poliomyelitis; Scopus; Acute flaccid paralysis; Citation; Thematic analysis; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Geography; Political science; Library science; Data science; Medicine; Sociology; Social science; Virology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Poliovirus; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.36115477138755553,"score_gpt":0.5568854569492151,"score_spread":0.19573068556165957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390235107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746316,0.0040726373,0.012871521,0.00459939,0.0016900187,0.00008659452,0.00049414084,0.000015761421,0.0015383397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938969,0.0033020594,0.0017796352,0.0000979232,0.00030822994,0.0000016646218,0.00004085883,0.000008950107,0.00056379806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851979,0.0006027649,0.0011915383,0.00053296576,0.011871967,0.0006028864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854089,0.007103264,0.0004977154,0.0003557294,0.0062172604,0.00041715076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028407568,0.00016223229,0.00050680107,0.8017661,0.00012911367,0.0025864618,0.0032310048,0.00034296804,0.0002879167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01955558,0.00012086667,0.00034957743,0.88702995,0.00014579551,0.00092005846,0.00067990896,0.0010101876,0.00007302219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022834698,0.00014653077,0.45135906,0.0000010259768,0.0006193607,0.00082984124,0.0001282823,0.0038433208,0.00008163253,0.0011623348,0.029987132,0.51161313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069041405,0.00014131964,0.8939389,0.000013586195,0.000030690437,0.000042813364,0.00021607798,0.06544508,0.000011332499,0.034654442,0.0046907845,0.00012457553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056964805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046461113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51148856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045188825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002218534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390536543","doi":"10.5860/crl.85.1.96","title":"Financial and Other Perceived Barriers to Transitioning to an Equitable No-Publishing Fee Open Access Model: A Survey of LIS Journal Editors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College & Research Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Open access publishing; Business; Electronic publishing; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Advertising; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.6982906713916218,"score_gpt":0.6083056759273465,"score_spread":0.0899849954642753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390536543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576017,0.0011587332,0.009436621,0.010658202,0.0025348198,0.0015252988,0.0025201198,0.00005352847,0.014510933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894256,0.000059432903,0.0039952043,0.0005822128,0.0009823561,0.000065920096,0.00000913252,0.000045945766,0.0053172233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98534703,0.001627078,0.00084668084,0.0010672269,0.009751714,0.0013602676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97729474,0.009777586,0.000100612044,0.00084895705,0.00909149,0.0028865875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.079270534,0.00019982767,0.0005108409,0.04704141,0.00176486,0.123609066,0.009109276,0.00019240106,0.0015680799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20138754,0.00014960584,0.00008780855,0.15920083,0.0004538921,0.02690092,0.0068385005,0.0010032302,0.000057792855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005973455,0.000072432274,0.011727508,0.00003449862,0.00002660162,0.00005424659,0.004603618,0.0008047327,0.0010135492,0.008730514,0.9598546,0.0124803595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019813122,0.0036159782,0.19240867,0.0006335926,0.000017075357,0.000040702544,0.013282796,0.18720278,0.0024037068,0.10793254,0.4892124,0.0012684579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002279362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006877256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4706422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016033623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074445405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390694881","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04904-1","title":"Country names in journal titles: shaping researchers’ perception of journals quality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Charles Sturt University","keywords":"Audience measurement; Publishing; Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Internationalization; Perception; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Psychology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.8876352380282057,"score_gpt":0.7020697218535584,"score_spread":0.18556551617464723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390694881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95221394,0.020578688,0.008039581,0.0011783344,0.0025479198,0.00024360736,0.00007097687,0.00003327197,0.01509367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99225575,0.0029277292,0.0013864174,0.00006694272,0.0001937835,0.000002918113,0.00000215824,0.000015967044,0.0031483644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96851635,0.0008523004,0.0018911517,0.0008389259,0.02685336,0.0010479033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811025,0.009849984,0.00047399415,0.00081143546,0.006869085,0.0008929824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18481858,0.00017276518,0.00047672898,0.29310152,0.0002688633,0.008265501,0.0031185395,0.00019779355,0.0028484464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15918395,0.000120467055,0.0002687126,0.5876537,0.0004422907,0.0017904092,0.00069507695,0.0011598056,0.00047775457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033222528,0.0002691926,0.32668442,0.000083949555,0.00002998971,0.00011104711,0.0022017413,0.0002084611,0.009192443,0.0020208957,0.030971346,0.6281933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007006803,0.0002830818,0.8733782,0.00029234096,0.0000090080475,0.00009832066,0.008077649,0.020268546,0.00042541072,0.018496,0.07756481,0.00040590312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017149442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027062393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000811816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010500075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390755087","doi":"10.1038/s41386-024-01796-4","title":"Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychopharmacology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.48461339746687737,"score_gpt":0.6353370452515822,"score_spread":0.15072364778470482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390755087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959884,0.0018967288,0.0002853218,0.0069201966,0.010437996,0.0011515869,0.000019736754,0.00007540494,0.019329015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928484,0.00094770925,0.00009807969,0.0048672077,0.00023599334,0.00010682156,0.0000013267731,0.000047012883,0.0008474516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898762,0.0018344526,0.0013930614,0.0017716138,0.004068736,0.0010559551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97340983,0.024020737,0.00029733733,0.00071199384,0.0010303764,0.0005297199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012689224,0.00030480657,0.00068442593,0.068644546,0.00012361059,0.011792328,0.012679467,0.00022070175,0.0015659657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02726498,0.00023820648,0.00019840847,0.2220613,0.00020056678,0.005020639,0.0038433343,0.0014382052,0.0006002254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007908304,0.0013779635,0.01805865,0.0000963381,0.000056746027,0.0018423378,0.0001407819,0.0004343224,0.34823567,0.0032736426,0.2286363,0.39705643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008987618,0.0018907996,0.642113,0.0000747304,0.00006909374,0.00006688186,0.000049569186,0.034275364,0.058957778,0.020156074,0.23262002,0.00073908345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011208164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009534301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6240543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014215818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032591022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390873698","doi":"10.32388/d0pndo","title":"Review of: \"Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Citation; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.54414708913449,"score_gpt":0.5464384669861437,"score_spread":0.0022913778516537864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390873698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026604014,0.87934035,0.00049702247,0.091806106,0.006000947,0.0013823779,0.0004649807,0.0000066992093,0.0178411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06539551,0.9065642,0.0008164852,0.0018944292,0.00057513185,0.00004584883,0.00007125362,0.000045735982,0.024591425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852963,0.0010782524,0.0036847158,0.0005196131,0.009106678,0.00031441165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636744,0.010615121,0.006698289,0.0018782663,0.016853523,0.00028036017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10570685,0.00025060383,0.0009973665,0.015923908,0.0005127613,0.005477896,0.0026622363,0.00018511972,0.00025568428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21508695,0.000085178275,0.0008960206,0.08535383,0.0011991805,0.002650707,0.0021968968,0.001732097,0.0000043101454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011753959,0.000053282,0.00014215444,0.0054046456,0.000096458636,0.00028753327,0.00018606354,0.0000025516172,0.0000015609804,0.0011462572,0.8948493,0.097818464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052782387,0.0001487414,0.0005690987,0.051099833,0.000506516,0.03501027,0.0011275087,0.00031835106,0.000010277242,0.085216925,0.82520014,0.0002645349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001084474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050462033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1093801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009136843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015184697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955545},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391239537","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.24.577031","title":"The Increasing Authorship trend in Neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Neuroscience; Psychology; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24078796745115016,"score_gpt":0.47352454809833866,"score_spread":0.2327365806471885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391239537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858526,0.0066298586,0.0005826178,0.0015532627,0.0037864754,0.0006638936,0.00069262396,0.00020075114,0.000037938302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980666,0.0007543114,0.00045989206,0.00015798879,0.00025917654,0.00012563943,2.2997439e-7,0.000072054674,0.00010412995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737198,0.0015599574,0.0022421402,0.0038133408,0.015925042,0.002739756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813561,0.008324931,0.0010728145,0.004163151,0.0038097778,0.0012732577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.109637626,0.0007737341,0.0012635675,0.1553535,0.0015262954,0.034042485,0.0090827625,0.00075850147,0.000068725756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087603614,0.00052636146,0.00075805763,0.622062,0.0014432286,0.00062786107,0.009024345,0.002436955,0.0002642817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006797856,0.00027809775,0.97652084,0.00012525622,0.00021504174,0.00035698037,0.00015131505,0.00086671876,0.0153333545,0.0037411842,0.0022006372,0.00014261731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028584505,0.000050917017,0.9469934,0.00009273256,0.00015608997,6.5080854e-8,0.000047900885,0.020466443,0.002779227,0.00019339322,0.028132629,0.0008013268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069197104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055444933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46670854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010754148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019966816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986446},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391311615","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-52233-x","title":"Impact of medical technologies may be predicted using constructed graph bibliometrics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Computer science; Random forest; Citation; Data science; Pipeline (software); Machine learning; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.47367089176192456,"score_gpt":0.5817619050905887,"score_spread":0.10809101332866411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391311615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97705024,0.0034444998,0.005687648,0.0005526815,0.011001835,0.00036155994,0.00012999272,0.00036880263,0.0014027391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978387,0.00019864769,0.0013297948,0.000005282988,0.000043670814,0.0000063222997,0.00002487353,0.000019743484,0.00053297303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639857,0.00020250262,0.0021056877,0.0019503529,0.03079354,0.0009622454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875954,0.0032435649,0.0006678366,0.0024134442,0.0054384894,0.0006412715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056235865,0.00027310435,0.0006058931,0.4201764,0.00039925735,0.008424798,0.002976054,0.00047960167,0.0025639671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11406645,0.00016952238,0.0006111692,0.7729387,0.002730061,0.001081087,0.0016412901,0.0006070742,0.00002629715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017146582,0.0003417586,0.5224246,0.00007139412,0.00021866268,0.003301613,0.0001891188,0.00020330083,0.01763592,0.0011742245,0.2510716,0.20335068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013827758,0.00134495,0.1894015,0.00082794734,0.00020788549,0.010473404,0.0044822143,0.30683732,0.05690463,0.28932557,0.1363468,0.0024649843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022615244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006747247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35276237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002117057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030328706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998397},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391608398","doi":"10.1111/1365-2435.14483","title":"Editors are biased too: An extension of Fox et al. (2023)'s analysis makes the case for triple‐blind review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Instituto Superior de Agronomia; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication bias; Identity (music); Gender bias; Biology; Double blind; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Psychology; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.5685267737783857,"score_gpt":0.5729761752933773,"score_spread":0.004449401514991624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391608398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5446532,0.07839823,0.053124823,0.25509247,0.058646284,0.0049842084,0.0027940846,0.00017003626,0.0021367143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737092,0.0032426044,0.00077578897,0.013599193,0.0012586315,0.00034213197,0.00021825773,0.000026389922,0.0068277796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950589,0.00051385636,0.0007734543,0.000798312,0.002506985,0.00034847658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97999185,0.015649164,0.00026622255,0.00066588307,0.0032670281,0.00015985832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02497814,0.00013459862,0.0004822727,0.024370246,0.00027293144,0.00046753432,0.0006808011,0.00011516766,0.0029204725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037224807,0.00007465001,0.00047311521,0.11420332,0.00016859264,0.0003367177,0.00020981755,0.0002381602,0.00012487652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008031409,0.00012571929,0.0025404228,0.00004000934,0.00017244066,0.00011602818,0.000011367211,0.00035503335,0.00005699648,0.0007291383,0.9758765,0.01989601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043026728,0.0004758763,0.08078352,0.000028579232,0.00025881198,0.00014529294,0.00027303855,0.028828142,0.00002456922,0.002955745,0.8856582,0.00013794705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007516377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040966546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42905605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007174175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036161265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391722944","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13189","title":"The gender citation gap: Approaches, explanations, and implications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociology Compass","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Gender gap; Social science; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8431052284939669,"score_gpt":0.5924655245783323,"score_spread":0.2506397039156345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391722944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5938459,0.066164985,0.12649335,0.15121472,0.0027730975,0.00089024345,0.00014200954,0.00024005021,0.058235615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979145,0.000413258,0.00038805898,0.00015407741,0.00007665712,0.00004986566,0.000012543887,0.0000048351144,0.0009861847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975981,0.0003174366,0.00030211947,0.00040796498,0.0010974162,0.00027697618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883696,0.010656539,0.000054841224,0.00034304344,0.0004674223,0.00010859313],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010099798,0.000069466325,0.00010731965,0.0065824906,0.00069353107,0.0013304629,0.00073834544,0.000092588976,0.00006311172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004839768,0.000038916416,0.00005683111,0.021830862,0.0004950537,0.0001924682,0.00020755181,0.0002290568,0.00024330177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002224876,0.000016978072,0.025958054,0.0000028793695,0.000030752846,0.0000011653167,0.0009324928,0.000014103706,0.00007842658,0.69573593,0.14375588,0.13347113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007155311,0.000019278123,0.34504065,8.9566555e-7,0.000004699796,0.000008523956,0.0016270746,0.012593609,0.0000071489662,0.5135383,0.12702098,0.00006725409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000623699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006624715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4040686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055580702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115437615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391733618","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae015","title":"A new initiative for the <i>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</i>: supporting early career investigators","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cancer; Library science; Family medicine; Gerontology; Medical education; Political science; Internal medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.7193994243751446,"score_gpt":0.5961869763124157,"score_spread":0.12321244806272891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391733618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69642353,0.026909193,0.02787916,0.15118596,0.0890223,0.0017805336,0.001604012,0.000024969977,0.005170349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938054,0.0005161248,0.0007614064,0.0028512483,0.0047340957,0.000016182024,7.092497e-7,0.000015832686,0.0017238891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833944,0.00020571302,0.001536568,0.00024424068,0.014246253,0.00037281544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977421,0.003988596,0.0018363795,0.00019146601,0.016252013,0.00031055068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019238502,0.00019063847,0.0003283483,0.0066058454,0.0006970538,0.001344549,0.0039487993,0.00011075078,0.00021689806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043691,0.000080766804,0.0006207368,0.035784103,0.00052053045,0.0023510244,0.00043309672,0.0009725509,0.0000062103904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020633324,0.00006959491,0.034198146,0.00003311909,0.0007256016,0.000011309142,0.002205893,0.044895943,0.0017503861,0.011746303,0.8536732,0.050484177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013144361,0.00016685227,0.081979245,0.0003969279,0.00017462534,0.00024621288,0.00027930012,0.004502199,0.0038985873,0.053856887,0.8529388,0.00024593822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033817103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039434506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.292957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011620102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016385479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391815425","doi":"10.1002/asi.24876","title":"Understanding super‐partnerships in scientific collaboration: Evidence from the field of economics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"General partnership; Value (mathematics); Productivity; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Citation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Library science; Statistics","score_opus":0.5916618700494413,"score_gpt":0.5238679637321623,"score_spread":0.067793906317279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391815425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8916984,0.00056638865,0.0028470058,0.10222366,0.0019737931,0.00024093651,0.000026247859,0.0000060926136,0.00041743324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994309,0.00015998687,0.00016984553,0.00012833184,0.000024497003,0.0000022658521,2.4553373e-7,9.821526e-7,0.0000829551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666184,0.000052807696,0.0007596102,0.00012069978,0.0022316135,0.00017339826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851962,0.0090641305,0.00077754253,0.0002537836,0.00466619,0.000042185125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039826635,0.000044381373,0.00013199529,0.0140345935,0.00037985484,0.002944574,0.0015705469,0.0000903768,0.0000075251855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12450515,0.000022941496,0.00005181997,0.079704285,0.00034596314,0.004709466,0.00023266407,0.00020157229,0.0000047276576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005918612,0.000035358025,0.4609311,0.000020714251,0.000042656295,5.3587775e-7,0.006135465,0.0006951019,0.0027050471,0.40115,0.06898053,0.059244335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009966537,0.00045524875,0.05213681,0.00029998197,0.000036880363,0.000015971125,0.033250354,0.085606374,0.027561355,0.5726186,0.22678687,0.00023487427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007500803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071705734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40879428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006104421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010770904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391884287","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00288","title":"Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Scopus; Field (mathematics); Web of science; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8724255180851594,"score_gpt":0.6912206117189744,"score_spread":0.18120490636618503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391884287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883734,0.005811346,0.0001378815,0.0018277458,0.0010302302,0.00020802478,0.000009161518,0.000006080001,0.0025961532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906886,0.00022595953,0.00045477063,0.00004508097,0.000008395542,0.0000062254453,1.3028351e-8,0.0000024025155,0.00018831014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98767656,0.00052114273,0.0007762242,0.0007356424,0.00979781,0.00049259583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9300773,0.060297325,0.0005236801,0.0010449978,0.007879028,0.00017764821],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1523189,0.00010470916,0.0003134749,0.022774063,0.00087147974,0.0008526848,0.003109043,0.000024721041,0.000010554252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37593144,0.000045865403,0.000051952797,0.29475185,0.016020475,0.0010348633,0.0020563956,0.0002775762,0.0000054449156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044718246,0.00004895225,0.53246844,0.00007234531,0.000019590576,0.0000036930978,0.0332015,0.000046012872,0.12691924,0.24966915,0.0007476963,0.056758657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113763504,0.00028041785,0.8804586,0.00017518047,0.0000043577566,0.0000018683727,0.06398246,0.0094078975,0.026490506,0.018786088,0.00018676021,0.00011210829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010109616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015183804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34799016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011694996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014517318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98830193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392018298","doi":"10.1002/leap.1599","title":"The publication facts label: A public and professional guide for research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford University","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8146641771034259,"score_gpt":0.6471720701494891,"score_spread":0.1674921069539368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392018298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17010725,0.0105298525,0.005459244,0.7810588,0.0023603595,0.0014062331,0.000067175206,0.0002546334,0.028756447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421653,0.00026219722,0.0013933957,0.00044665774,0.00037524776,0.0002097852,0.000020363179,0.000026764892,0.055100266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98605657,0.0008925538,0.00075426674,0.0010697687,0.009949764,0.0012770982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336353,0.051959958,0.00015893929,0.0010756445,0.012397209,0.0007729602],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13971376,0.00012258749,0.00016137362,0.025598451,0.0020389592,0.14300057,0.0029609033,0.00018433706,0.000160257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42632398,0.000066806155,0.00007964664,0.11659441,0.0003611699,0.00870838,0.0014985442,0.0010071162,0.0001951178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008592092,0.000025002475,0.0020749555,0.000007953115,0.000008959338,0.0000013622944,0.00018984897,4.6338621e-7,0.0002982729,0.09699711,0.38126943,0.5191181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020822448,0.000056183693,0.005680037,0.000015680234,0.0000016245928,0.000006190561,0.0014661213,0.024379,0.00012550678,0.11042575,0.8575459,0.00008977361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001042312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010431803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016483884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008863274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392057301","doi":"10.3389/frma.2024.1335454","title":"Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Scraper site; Information retrieval; Visualization; Data science; Graph; Citation database; Data retrieval; Data visualization; World Wide Web; Data mining; Scopus","score_opus":0.7988117842642299,"score_gpt":0.6516311723059829,"score_spread":0.14718061195824705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392057301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6699031,0.19151671,0.12185672,0.0054279165,0.0037558433,0.0016079283,0.0014939567,0.00025089426,0.0041869585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483922,0.016151702,0.03341378,0.000029219907,0.00008893478,0.0000035553574,0.00004783743,0.000033570177,0.001839195],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810916,0.0011185111,0.0013567737,0.0016006888,0.013795063,0.0010373705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97938466,0.013038029,0.00021045584,0.0016862286,0.004879891,0.00080074085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12568912,0.00023329367,0.00068219245,0.20019421,0.00037182428,0.005100957,0.0028994507,0.00033440013,0.000041991643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22167334,0.00017821012,0.0000935121,0.43989357,0.00077877956,0.0016037587,0.002654542,0.001585181,0.000019498633],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001211123,0.00029812875,0.23074003,0.00028899123,0.00020393022,0.0002008099,0.00038935847,0.00008171761,0.0006617937,0.0046866187,0.270911,0.49141648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044925633,0.00025845322,0.027776523,0.00006432899,0.000027917697,0.0000065339455,0.0016309065,0.90654355,0.0002423133,0.0151420105,0.047633022,0.00022518933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011780952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000851989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90646183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024488213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062305277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392109487","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x","title":"Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Scientometrics; Data science; Regional science; Bibliometrics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Sociology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5043046486588112,"score_gpt":0.5676367040364447,"score_spread":0.06333205537763353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392109487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719712,0.015067001,0.0012932578,0.0013977997,0.0023335377,0.00017038498,0.000036853522,0.000020855432,0.007709087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956211,0.0023825346,0.00065829355,0.00010093946,0.00007221149,0.0000027056094,5.1781035e-7,0.000008807585,0.0011528878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708697,0.00014674026,0.0009705138,0.0009175018,0.026178908,0.0009166171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857115,0.005847993,0.0002210204,0.0005897503,0.0068010613,0.00082868844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.097425595,0.00015729885,0.0003509867,0.38178134,0.00041558163,0.008781928,0.0029635502,0.00009248902,0.00015958688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1065742,0.00010930417,0.00010431078,0.7053051,0.0030285027,0.0024069815,0.0010997886,0.0005469694,0.00006264549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003005771,0.00024672673,0.43028668,0.00006868945,0.000013493342,0.00017750062,0.0006907793,0.0001280257,0.006268474,0.035109,0.033124793,0.49385577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011584149,0.000528455,0.7285021,0.00021279513,0.000011545889,0.00040895274,0.00095600705,0.07250423,0.0021664097,0.05443011,0.13854542,0.00057556224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005421605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014931583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49328023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045302146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032279708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392122745","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00296","title":"Do you cite what you tweet? Investigating the relationship between tweeting and citing research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Academic institution; Institution; Positive correlation; Unit (ring theory); Social media; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.9203955165518652,"score_gpt":0.6926351140286738,"score_spread":0.2277604025231914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392122745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436449,0.039629452,0.00050925586,0.013725788,0.0005813554,0.00033031718,0.000011280944,0.00005588345,0.0015118137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547786,0.0008321369,0.0028920954,0.00006499393,0.00015842935,0.000028726885,5.254313e-7,0.000013217348,0.0005320181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335004,0.0012147982,0.00081603933,0.0015037673,0.011885104,0.0012302733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69536424,0.28672642,0.0005214778,0.0016622578,0.014738984,0.0009866427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16079594,0.00020870079,0.00035798197,0.028577762,0.0054632216,0.020275336,0.002213239,0.00005958342,0.00001684802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4448118,0.000116098985,0.00008977124,0.22993848,0.009591062,0.004979122,0.0025678172,0.0009220902,0.00023722697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002558535,0.000008507005,0.760379,0.000029977582,0.000028003213,0.000008417553,0.022370117,0.000017977503,0.00148546,0.103012964,0.0010996395,0.11155736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009673106,0.0001862629,0.49380046,0.00039650415,0.00001121585,0.0000042126007,0.23015375,0.004906522,0.00084869185,0.26813993,0.0012456254,0.0002100927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005259866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017191709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2879858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019730451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043577774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99583155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392139713","doi":"10.1007/s11024-024-09521-7","title":"Citation Elites in Polytheistic and Umbrella Disciplines: Patterns of Stratification and Concentration in Danish and British Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minerva","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Université de Lausanne; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Discipline; Danish; Nexus (standard); Context (archaeology); Higher education; Social science; Citation; Elite; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Biology; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.3343400614231054,"score_gpt":0.5265837888977356,"score_spread":0.1922437274746302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392139713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99469334,0.0036760785,0.00076012156,0.00032785843,0.000076587385,0.00013402158,0.00002783271,0.000004278046,0.00029990455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.000503106,0.00016827056,0.000007843491,0.000013129089,0.0000043551872,0.000003777563,0.0000027457118,0.00011959021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762154,0.000051683448,0.0003888738,0.00044617124,0.0013182478,0.00017347206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822867,0.0011842004,0.000056456804,0.00012072306,0.00032128373,0.000088672365],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267993,0.000055187273,0.0001188785,0.0074123815,0.000052852596,0.0020186242,0.00020349122,0.00003515111,0.000013700182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047219982,0.000047194844,0.000009046052,0.031985547,0.0002702896,0.00066199497,0.0001205325,0.000072677634,0.0000012161992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034876214,0.000027335864,0.77739495,0.000041360923,9.4751294e-7,0.0000078092535,0.0007239042,0.000008204349,0.02172067,0.0022612547,0.00002850855,0.19778153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001533791,0.000041307347,0.9418057,0.00008825817,0.0000015097013,0.000009130284,0.0006306281,0.052543707,0.00044496797,0.004190634,0.000035551126,0.000055200817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008856114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016707217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19772634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101857535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392244592","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001323","title":"Research productivity and gender of research award recipients in international ophthalmology societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Eye Institute; Research to Prevent Blindness","keywords":"Productivity; Ophthalmology; Optometry; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.8837543029489549,"score_gpt":0.7297434568297326,"score_spread":0.15401084611922222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392244592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89472014,0.001222975,0.000016287584,0.005950356,0.0019712395,0.0015656024,0.000040529536,0.000008984217,0.09450391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97744364,0.00009657655,0.0006915326,0.000009788207,0.00017856796,0.00028732966,0.000006654991,0.00002170352,0.021264207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97902966,0.005240612,0.0013161756,0.002147751,0.0108502135,0.0014156097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97593415,0.01681626,0.00014362899,0.0012106515,0.0056035887,0.00029169422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17873117,0.00018097705,0.0006084175,0.05595885,0.0002992184,0.0023221874,0.0057753907,0.00036082562,0.0023984013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0604835,0.00013926633,0.0001003479,0.0967475,0.002081795,0.0010600252,0.009856023,0.0015248306,0.00037296783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052989495,0.0007877298,0.89018744,0.00013163041,0.000103748476,0.0036623667,0.002009883,0.000037655314,0.0020647927,0.014166776,0.0631088,0.023209298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005699042,0.0007080456,0.72367924,0.00007017539,0.0000024674464,0.003959198,0.0025183444,0.0016028598,0.0007088621,0.2586283,0.0073195994,0.00023299221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008369226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010959121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24446152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033967412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010533239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392326892","doi":"10.51644/9780889206823","title":"Physics at the National Research Council of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research council; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8922391372286239,"score_gpt":0.6046294376475583,"score_spread":0.28760969958106564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392326892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009350132,0.000669928,0.000075582335,0.0011688485,0.00034088278,0.00026274018,0.00046553081,0.0000045431752,0.99691844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00229968,0.000034816945,0.000044246084,0.00018012253,0.00037231756,0.000008762829,0.00001515951,0.000015036011,0.99702984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.80934286,0.00029827733,0.0008342117,0.00073438906,0.18809518,0.0006950707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86468023,0.023218619,0.00032916525,0.00079770637,0.11077359,0.00020067171],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13653177,0.00017476504,0.0003813666,0.014633218,0.0005920736,0.00084231305,0.004478668,0.00020394725,0.0036948568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10046693,0.0000901308,0.00017145717,0.10284838,0.00069246884,0.000120949386,0.0018845269,0.0007601624,0.00038051393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005390698,0.000021106636,0.000102654136,0.0000048505076,0.000012355656,0.0000033093481,0.000011055523,0.00008271103,0.000009160344,0.011079142,0.9847474,0.0039208764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091454385,0.000026171678,0.0005591265,0.0000058367536,0.0000015597822,0.0000016226664,0.000014313773,0.00052747544,0.000085400075,0.07960228,0.91898406,0.00010072849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23727879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71876615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4814874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0217693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1345837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392361002","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011797","title":"Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"International Brain Research Organization","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Scrutiny; Disadvantaged; Equity (law); Public relations; Political science; Simple (philosophy); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.4845617284525126,"score_gpt":0.5741376999064534,"score_spread":0.08957597145394075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392361002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526175,0.0023133457,0.041196253,0.0023713373,0.00048449115,0.00024651142,0.0004972927,0.00003127547,0.00024199403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947457,0.000037517682,0.0044849804,0.000121327736,0.00009443662,0.000016479733,0.00019724287,0.000007729286,0.00029460868],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964404,0.0001389834,0.00058932824,0.00047914893,0.0020527567,0.00029935793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98671246,0.011678822,0.00013795946,0.00014525659,0.0012197071,0.00010580308],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052800598,0.00009364238,0.0002362145,0.013361174,0.0009120042,0.0002521618,0.0009853048,0.00014128828,0.00019853366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013356488,0.000063541556,0.00011808321,0.0183276,0.00027149013,0.0002298009,0.0029456404,0.00015914375,0.000119987606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029865783,0.00032790937,0.2718585,0.0001968118,0.00030280024,0.000009219226,0.0029150157,0.004465944,0.056558836,0.25414237,0.04273254,0.3661914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018330182,0.00015162573,0.016280774,0.000013946958,0.0000059279528,0.0000038374064,0.00002855498,0.122704655,0.0011339929,0.76551604,0.09388937,0.000087985696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018980007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004791752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51137364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011097784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030321314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392710287","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27201","title":"Cancer research in the United Arab Emirates from birth to present: A bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Jazan University","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliometrics; Library science; Citation; Web of science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.6333628103930268,"score_gpt":0.6113962410367524,"score_spread":0.02196656935627439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392710287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94748795,0.038573544,0.00086953695,0.009177657,0.00043214383,0.0004692568,0.00024540277,0.00004374561,0.0027007805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98784107,0.008497212,0.00012564656,0.0003553272,0.00027534593,0.00015004141,0.000019033434,0.000016890535,0.0027194202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784665,0.0015055512,0.00079638365,0.0013309092,0.016789261,0.001111403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709153,0.024316182,0.00006741586,0.0014287063,0.0028139974,0.00045838498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04436214,0.00018834084,0.0003944647,0.91871595,0.000300386,0.010007203,0.0044275476,0.00015225625,0.0022724192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017698303,0.00010331939,0.0002475352,0.99077517,0.00015367375,0.0005209385,0.000965749,0.00088173384,0.0021992081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000987902,0.0003846731,0.5902508,0.000080266465,0.00035736462,0.00038241665,0.0027540629,0.0035786678,0.0017420714,0.0010823928,0.07199352,0.32729495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017758309,0.00012543828,0.60685563,0.00009068907,0.00003118968,0.0000012595427,0.001156826,0.019710435,0.0006105435,0.0029885522,0.36805058,0.00020126076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009624821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014065258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3270937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023784758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031037923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392914366","doi":"10.1590/scielopreprints.8272","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diamond; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Materials science","score_opus":0.9267854277029286,"score_gpt":0.7613054004305294,"score_spread":0.1654800272723992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392914366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5393508,0.077509716,0.0018933367,0.31731588,0.011627531,0.0044910247,0.00016616115,0.000074274416,0.04757127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413328,0.026727755,0.0034293362,0.0010905872,0.00017243023,0.00026298736,0.00000112542,0.000036718837,0.026946215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684061,0.0010400811,0.0022543352,0.003031666,0.023876837,0.001390991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95652026,0.025591316,0.00089766254,0.0033764972,0.012605993,0.0010082552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17056301,0.00047278273,0.0011912601,0.18233812,0.00095761206,0.12641938,0.051158387,0.00026318675,0.0010825995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1960936,0.00022904054,0.00031153866,0.4764789,0.0014399482,0.0032146932,0.16146521,0.0028044814,0.0017909565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012818318,0.00032579826,0.02053758,0.00017751426,0.00030920192,0.0003020726,0.037732907,0.0023475438,0.0017970008,0.037381053,0.6785009,0.22046024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025353252,0.00012845879,0.045482114,0.0007618942,0.000021661746,0.000006559628,0.032488506,0.0046098456,0.0018180516,0.8991857,0.014660449,0.0005832089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015447164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001298266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86180466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076090347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023230591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392937379","doi":"10.18438/eblip30413","title":"Plan S and Open Access (OA) in Quebec: What Does the Revised FRQ OA Policy Mean for Researchers?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Computer science; Plan (archaeology); Library science; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.5463859046696865,"score_gpt":0.598080145162363,"score_spread":0.05169424049267646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392937379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845731,0.014022385,0.004349061,0.94990975,0.00051666604,0.0026170271,0.000080306345,0.00006808633,0.009979395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83575577,0.058532305,0.0042406344,0.09265056,0.00041615777,0.00039887257,0.000071526985,0.000030738473,0.0079034325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538726,0.0007507014,0.0006963492,0.00040919855,0.0023827215,0.00037379074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94983554,0.048547238,0.00027633063,0.000573564,0.0004658813,0.0003014506],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024854712,0.0001279056,0.0001919082,0.016070625,0.00043484636,0.11361315,0.0031115145,0.00008866487,0.00034471485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08361919,0.000066380475,0.000044782253,0.052726176,0.00023130556,0.56881845,0.002143628,0.00038459303,0.000052719904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060658844,0.000032111366,0.002564566,0.00017139124,0.000013985659,0.000007865037,0.0013552291,0.000031644482,0.000016996239,0.1758841,0.029884232,0.7894313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000355217,0.00012831468,0.010738149,0.0003294516,0.000006132434,0.000007451285,0.005853471,0.036675557,0.00032975228,0.0067139273,0.9387248,0.00013778805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027100878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90884054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048175007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99508137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393047402","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/uw3xe","title":"Does double-blind peer review effectively correct for gender disparities in research funding?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Health Research Council of New Zealand; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Volkswagen Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Double blind; Peer review; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9217960907590893,"score_gpt":0.7064090594723512,"score_spread":0.21538703128673808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393047402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13441132,0.29070807,0.014258205,0.14492081,0.048285212,0.04317449,0.002591931,0.00055456226,0.3210954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6665321,0.024253221,0.0016317436,0.00058698293,0.0008920624,0.003882265,0.00013458435,0.00012487912,0.30196217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600169,0.0012816141,0.001877309,0.0032351227,0.031554677,0.0020343554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943022,0.030379161,0.00032474406,0.0023067982,0.023202695,0.00076457526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24185373,0.00050420326,0.0013942663,0.135247,0.00035046524,0.011111605,0.005909484,0.00068933296,0.0014024717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13886954,0.00024669626,0.00073762203,0.18538752,0.0003760768,0.00033296648,0.012445357,0.0037717877,0.0010699902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006213543,0.00024442218,0.016762784,0.004689584,0.000095559095,0.000044013203,0.00018248465,0.000033036435,0.000019548199,0.009361734,0.91866714,0.04927834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003855095,0.00033729034,0.014726268,0.003529113,0.00006899667,0.000009387909,0.00079141965,0.0054967753,0.00067114143,0.659064,0.31021848,0.0012320258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014614195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050668494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64970225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086747075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014983019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393161024","doi":"10.32388/prf7hb","title":"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Qeios","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8667607491182786,"score_gpt":0.6416170106213568,"score_spread":0.22514373849692182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393161024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40366685,0.017934943,0.000035252247,0.06198226,0.005816259,0.0017256169,0.0003387904,0.00004763025,0.5084524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722957,0.00031205377,0.00007523603,0.00016426499,0.0003822951,0.00010509737,0.000011015854,0.000021229836,0.026633108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810413,0.00091885525,0.00078475004,0.0013652045,0.014459037,0.0014308501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987473,0.006959795,0.000098255405,0.0019664827,0.002815196,0.0006872813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09979435,0.00020269198,0.00036496815,0.20778154,0.00054383755,0.011894807,0.0070683355,0.00048685507,0.0019490663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042559646,0.00011579308,0.00019497982,0.3051122,0.00026934902,0.0000881217,0.008159938,0.0046791914,0.008998463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056375616,0.00003765923,0.05439732,0.000051526662,0.000028529577,0.00044499102,0.0016052551,0.00035058166,0.000020956828,0.0032679227,0.814931,0.12485867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015681071,0.000030207288,0.16488677,0.00016310478,0.0000025369484,0.000008807909,0.002863094,0.029922552,0.000021029871,0.3037512,0.49785563,0.00033825892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27988008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5543631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56862885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000795753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004434019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393240927","doi":"10.5751/es-14694-290133","title":"The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ernest Oppenheimer Memorial Trust; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Social network analysis; Co-citation; Citation; Sociology; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Data science; Geography; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Environmental science; Library science; Social capital","score_opus":0.5661443252570436,"score_gpt":0.5981302566166787,"score_spread":0.03198593135963512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393240927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98654616,0.006571216,0.0017280033,0.0018364873,0.00038505276,0.00026110368,0.00002620647,0.000018977282,0.0026267744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969796,0.0008802373,0.00008048448,0.0000250625,0.00012530679,0.000025261576,0.0000047447384,0.00000339405,0.0018758953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455154,0.0016601976,0.00047447297,0.0004922523,0.002301639,0.00051988417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97498244,0.02351868,0.00010936086,0.00018487529,0.0010663343,0.00013828684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070551194,0.00007958334,0.0002915687,0.00524122,0.0016091956,0.0013132321,0.0004645838,0.00032962146,0.00007494586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008471711,0.000045967816,0.00019453127,0.080743395,0.0012318565,0.000164928,0.00022651693,0.00048897887,0.000029187471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003899176,0.00009143432,0.5705145,0.000043176587,0.0006309984,0.000008413709,0.0052784598,0.00027410203,0.000113891096,0.19198689,0.22355385,0.007465304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010522931,0.00015179907,0.89457184,0.0000023883167,0.000039391285,0.0000023183768,0.0054503796,0.054848652,0.0000023752134,0.032160036,0.012606196,0.000059366896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005400637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007026542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32405737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017525615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019805481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998804},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4393277428","doi":"10.32388/y3qmnw","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393277428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393278113","doi":"10.32388/g7qjow","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393278113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393299293","doi":"10.32388/8edmdn","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393299293","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393310426","doi":"10.32388/u1q6oi","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393310426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393354629","doi":"10.32388/lxub5b","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393354629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393372233","doi":"10.3386/w32285","title":"Explorations of Cumulative Advantage Using Data on French Physicists","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.967097118024302,"score_gpt":0.7719073767370955,"score_spread":0.19518974128720645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393372233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027016105,0.0031670618,0.00030665664,0.0009149749,0.0024727674,0.0012151145,0.0081297215,0.000019514813,0.9567581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822636,0.001079427,0.000823025,0.000009225552,0.00074778503,0.000027355925,0.0010343322,0.000049879352,0.013965364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966808,0.0005368025,0.0020381408,0.0016945617,0.028290924,0.0006315274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563561,0.01914313,0.00096281106,0.0021930009,0.02108203,0.00026290983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07457629,0.00026616082,0.0008755133,0.08593581,0.00018575316,0.00092256104,0.0058460943,0.0003569501,0.0010544836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07477647,0.00021328343,0.00028416072,0.050070673,0.00066159497,0.0009582598,0.0032202676,0.001228563,0.0007546177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073940195,0.0007471492,0.0022609879,0.00030644718,0.00054671,0.000033486485,0.00023766179,0.0076179495,0.0017333284,0.23866692,0.71250415,0.03527127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041152915,0.0003638279,0.0012807474,0.00034187696,0.000028686409,0.0000108652885,0.00037717275,0.08759011,0.001629536,0.8513924,0.05615374,0.0004194931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015254465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117554555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019419811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011363537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998587},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4393411564","doi":"10.4324/9781003330431-16","title":"Tracing excellence and equity in research funding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Tracing; Equity (law); Political science; Business; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.946170150598094,"score_gpt":0.717905010685228,"score_spread":0.2282651399128659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393411564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015223153,0.010057913,0.00019571638,0.0009918646,0.000545324,0.00031525598,0.000021317823,0.000028051145,0.9863222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19744879,0.0022559098,0.00017791403,0.000023676213,0.00012563805,0.000005497211,0.0000012295067,0.00002528246,0.79993606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781681,0.00011077711,0.0009914226,0.0017439912,0.01788075,0.0011049815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98483527,0.011822249,0.00010864237,0.0008691251,0.0018050506,0.0005596458],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09180651,0.00025057507,0.00051884516,0.18651189,0.0002535568,0.006478989,0.0025132354,0.00044940008,0.004322356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015661754,0.00017313343,0.00013373264,0.06891455,0.0004903908,0.00041734852,0.005758731,0.0020564182,0.0028124852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012315271,0.000020764508,0.0008185745,0.0000732495,0.000011765094,0.0003278707,0.00018247016,0.000003581968,0.00008139262,0.47534245,0.025160111,0.49796546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011060059,0.00010172456,0.0005727519,0.0002274419,0.0000029198477,0.000014881017,0.00025022225,0.0020005156,0.00004880898,0.7683524,0.22805272,0.00026501814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019391211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026168898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49770042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042654763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034540784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393509540","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-00899-8","title":"Impact factors are outdated, but new research assessments still fail scientists","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.7130782416689977,"score_gpt":0.7061581106054855,"score_spread":0.0069201310635121915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393509540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97736055,0.008769404,0.0006204737,0.0018908378,0.004141226,0.00037840052,0.00043862572,0.00012365519,0.006276831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505781,0.00015044257,0.00028469544,0.0000807614,0.00034015038,0.0000042125175,0.000027659427,0.00002816904,0.048505798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712485,0.0004631617,0.00057473924,0.0016274776,0.024659568,0.0014265743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866915,0.0058942772,0.00012299397,0.0012962855,0.0047075334,0.0012874287],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025591386,0.00027887756,0.0003892131,0.084314205,0.00044967374,0.015872821,0.004418872,0.0013492184,0.003209196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042781886,0.00016210004,0.0003427782,0.30015007,0.00026373722,0.0015293773,0.001435708,0.0063347905,0.0025191896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002061267,0.00008290324,0.1794532,0.000012401562,0.000047651098,0.00020616528,0.00018127554,0.000015304136,0.0011488925,0.0006601011,0.75264597,0.0655255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030896236,0.0002352388,0.58873236,0.00006059066,0.000006927191,0.000016244985,0.0008214967,0.0029520064,0.00097075413,0.008585245,0.3970089,0.00030129368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004745683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006778016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40927914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063015206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015776684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393623353","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3871616","title":"Factors affecting altmetrics attention to scholarly publication in peer-reviewed journals published in Iran and Turkey","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Peer review; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5475436600551109,"score_gpt":0.487099471812507,"score_spread":0.06044418824260389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393623353","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050019953,0.0014165752,0.0012181367,0.017630538,0.0009536428,0.0036957997,0.91960657,0.0003039661,0.005154806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056006048,0.0016136528,0.0002279135,0.0005484386,0.00028866544,4.25716e-7,0.939771,0.000803857,0.0007400043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985166,0.0021520671,0.0015263654,0.0016142224,0.008673142,0.0008681939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98692495,0.0011285965,0.00076853734,0.001213772,0.0089096045,0.001054527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04494481,0.00034954897,0.0007022246,0.08316389,0.0012903245,0.046019644,0.0057175294,0.00033492557,0.008146954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41193807,0.00029621564,0.0001359374,0.1829975,0.000112237554,0.003496651,0.005343354,0.0019253271,0.0057966853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020710817,0.00013622723,0.0005435775,0.00005700606,0.000011821901,0.000013640978,0.00021881952,0.000008997847,0.0001110462,0.00001758077,0.9244936,0.07436694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048632477,0.00022757464,0.07263897,0.00008410736,0.000007696099,0.00001404364,0.00044372678,0.00013896608,0.000010713596,0.00010678604,0.92556417,0.00027692813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023656983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013343119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36699328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066486956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029336083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393933266","doi":"10.32388/30oed8","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393933266","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394084988","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12813794","title":"data.rar","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.9346689568531503,"score_gpt":0.6642941388718242,"score_spread":0.2703748179813261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394084988","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.066346e-8,0.00073287735,8.2125075e-7,0.00038016564,0.0003798817,0.0002456826,0.99727744,0.000029330658,0.0009537524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000011162083,0.00007694317,0.000068166206,0.00065610756,0.0004857954,0.000033147833,0.9979007,0.000014965919,0.0007630457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824371,0.00019462904,0.00074649625,0.0017765664,0.014234387,0.0006108187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846275,0.0062861103,0.0005411866,0.0054260176,0.002257594,0.000861626],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035286653,0.00028409413,0.00052976253,0.03529285,0.00018162138,0.0057811425,0.023060925,0.00040840544,0.73375595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40368703,0.00020126473,0.00016029291,0.1682382,0.0000183214,0.00066394324,0.013239819,0.00094470545,0.4510757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026862153,0.000027925818,0.0000016500671,0.00003754875,0.000011310591,0.0001749392,0.000001376612,6.480829e-7,1.781917e-7,2.497856e-7,0.99308616,0.0066553443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092897186,0.000045548797,0.00010999533,0.0001083348,0.0000050239214,0.0000067394903,0.0000098661985,0.00035601106,0.000002315312,0.000078017125,0.9989304,0.00025488058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022427248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026198406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40015835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005671367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006917801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99525094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394303066","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.13537178","title":"Data for: Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Computer science; Environmental science; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.6821170456228837,"score_gpt":0.5770444516135597,"score_spread":0.105072594009324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394303066","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039291728,0.0006429502,0.000008536355,0.0003093103,0.00024957658,0.00085785287,0.99740165,0.000023710832,0.00011346705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003384776,0.000090109104,0.0002109962,0.00037023186,0.00048047744,0.00016820723,0.9883639,0.000053296026,0.0099242935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98157865,0.0006782442,0.0008410823,0.002310953,0.0133381095,0.001252949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701916,0.015160138,0.0006950732,0.0054896353,0.007187993,0.001275559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00846483,0.0005551237,0.0008150514,0.029625816,0.0003894083,0.007901649,0.0077558258,0.0005526123,0.45708555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15999928,0.00031887228,0.00027668063,0.07015644,0.00007827184,0.0013553399,0.0037804649,0.00094754767,0.006258084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013831169,0.00007846933,0.000031211934,0.00012628935,0.0001284849,0.00042005605,0.000010199887,0.00009343778,0.000038739716,2.0504439e-7,0.9975028,0.0014318137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077297736,0.00021699094,0.0029226076,0.00038972977,0.000037784812,0.000012569373,0.00003594394,0.0027311211,0.000036021767,0.000028976325,0.99225074,0.000564559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079899805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027457305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45082748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048814833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023995973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394316031","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.8081546","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and 6 English speaking countries 1996-2014: Spreadsheets with 162 graphs.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5119359524711655,"score_gpt":0.5126589981933131,"score_spread":0.0007230457221475417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394316031","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025049723,0.0015379216,0.000009191746,0.000027324388,0.0003696315,0.00082706084,0.99449044,0.000011949064,0.00022152903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033637915,0.00021598641,0.000056128403,0.000079536614,0.00014085534,0.000108360226,0.9656431,0.000015710837,0.000102398306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929962,0.00014456677,0.00059017376,0.001044985,0.004552128,0.0006719126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863375,0.009412565,0.0005155551,0.0008134127,0.0026620068,0.00025897956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027559123,0.00035832459,0.00065130845,0.032385286,0.00014713197,0.0037754609,0.001777407,0.00046703397,0.045656674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0424692,0.000221543,0.00015037715,0.02867365,0.0000427535,0.0007256221,0.0004919792,0.0005008433,0.0004930434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047605303,0.000029963741,0.013325314,0.0001776212,0.000025114816,0.000011205294,0.00015668922,0.000010166755,1.6131176e-7,0.0000023766281,0.9850074,0.0012063908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060271623,0.00038107342,0.1275431,0.0004930369,0.000013360906,0.0000047238154,0.00018269932,0.0003260964,0.000005127436,0.00039345995,0.86963236,0.00042224932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027284608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006693199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115375035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008961584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041349785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394581234","doi":"10.32388/cvkx5i","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394581234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394675445","doi":"10.32388/n17grc","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394675445","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394689084","doi":"10.32388/87cbih","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Cartography; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394689084","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394763394","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000005700","title":"Bibliometric Networks for Researchers in Health Professions Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Network for Innovation in Education; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Social network analysis; Bibliometrics; Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Health science; Network analysis; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Social media","score_opus":0.8012703957469408,"score_gpt":0.7019638239757008,"score_spread":0.09930657177124003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394763394","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09902692,0.3677409,0.19874905,0.30766907,0.011750517,0.004433418,0.000033433906,0.00020843437,0.010388256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95628726,0.01630339,0.00034121095,0.0015846855,0.0010202328,0.00019853764,0.000023191855,0.000023597482,0.024217902],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895954,0.00051445107,0.001386716,0.0008964954,0.0065935478,0.0010133487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790005,0.018204616,0.00018335719,0.00052713323,0.0012743303,0.0008100487],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08890359,0.0001469427,0.00040284198,0.63274336,0.00019482023,0.00033468855,0.0019157554,0.00027537977,0.00043296837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12096926,0.00008924418,0.00007021196,0.8562435,0.00023198538,0.000529895,0.00031746327,0.0014771462,0.000116494484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127678095,0.00001579394,0.009016412,0.000051493553,0.000004369521,0.0000018998057,0.0005595483,0.000043979264,0.000043711818,0.005209004,0.47311476,0.51192623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078000856,0.00056467415,0.038222425,0.0009622866,0.0000051773045,0.000012855929,0.005965265,0.10418932,0.000029885137,0.06521108,0.78383577,0.0002212701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003439777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014229996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85726035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040096565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018552869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394768444","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-04981-w","title":"Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Novelty; Scopus; Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Creativity; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.89847556445197,"score_gpt":0.7359858661900647,"score_spread":0.1624896982619053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394768444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864584,0.0041509597,0.113623306,0.053777814,0.011330716,0.0030846884,0.0011825678,0.00049649767,0.025895108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92848015,0.000105886276,0.0052921106,0.00060701737,0.0004593851,0.00007905862,0.0000062897993,0.000049973307,0.06492012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515532,0.00034565243,0.001255796,0.0034354443,0.04102551,0.0023843846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627688,0.016287642,0.00016072259,0.0028902027,0.01527341,0.0026192549],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11287813,0.00038807414,0.00057937205,0.38840893,0.0011103536,0.018075868,0.007795368,0.00025483654,0.0016488236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22622605,0.00023825964,0.0003503373,0.8426282,0.0008968755,0.0018212951,0.0076874127,0.0014015146,0.00772296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015043531,0.00080072996,0.015969815,0.00007373959,0.00005597473,0.00020734915,0.011031082,0.00007333726,0.0037540898,0.0033578305,0.56636477,0.39816087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005463494,0.0014245929,0.10843466,0.00016273528,0.000017131479,0.00007058738,0.005119682,0.024558984,0.009207766,0.0081401635,0.8414085,0.0009088741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119358214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041417497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45421925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010590259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014067339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992638},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4394770097","doi":"10.32388/dzhu8l","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394770097","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394793730","doi":"10.32388/pvhbsv","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394793730","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394804157","doi":"10.32388/wkishy","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394804157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394841320","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0299319","title":"Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Regional science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9301051811473721,"score_gpt":0.610114133390933,"score_spread":0.31999104775643905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394841320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987467,0.027239773,0.00017546119,0.03704509,0.00026773819,0.0016977873,0.00035573824,0.0000713447,0.034400325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846705,0.0015088805,0.00062602974,0.000022006736,0.00018837338,0.00007211124,0.0000047517856,0.000019859848,0.012887454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97159904,0.0025775246,0.0007412473,0.0010045827,0.023092246,0.0009853838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94500375,0.040985197,0.000101856924,0.0012479565,0.012193468,0.00046778115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07522104,0.00015026763,0.0003617918,0.03418363,0.0010168254,0.004465543,0.0021512108,0.00015855931,0.00023481165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08773247,0.0000903166,0.00007505028,0.23297524,0.0018253371,0.00071563787,0.0011940825,0.0014806017,0.00029612603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036713024,0.0041741016,0.033509694,0.00040244215,0.0012115769,0.00041801066,0.022037212,0.00003623251,0.05704384,0.41008842,0.42359075,0.04712059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002139046,0.00402719,0.13346066,0.0019444895,0.00021782493,0.000018009292,0.045311812,0.042242512,0.03906808,0.31258336,0.41752225,0.0014647596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034248768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057848776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19879161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019940804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011235478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394856249","doi":"10.32388/hvv99g","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394856249","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394956624","doi":"10.32388/27obs0","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394956624","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394970969","doi":"10.32388/fmqb3n","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394970969","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395011888","doi":"10.32388/aphl2q","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Physical geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395011888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395012246","doi":"10.32388/3afaf5","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395012246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030071","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11616","title":"The Top 100 Cited Articles Focusing on Acute Lung Injury and ARDS: Bibliometric and Visualization Analyses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Respiratory Care","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Commission of Jiangxi Province","keywords":"Medicine; ARDS; Visualization; Intensive care medicine; Lung; Internal medicine; Data mining","score_opus":0.4764789478124501,"score_gpt":0.614326852314032,"score_spread":0.13784790450158185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404131,0.057267822,0.0008216602,0.0002700712,0.00033485933,0.00020818313,0.00005155417,0.00005969713,0.00057303364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.0012158141,0.00004033793,0.00025457467,0.00012005503,0.000009297995,0.000002405615,0.000017039265,0.00016428703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938258,0.00032074342,0.00048679445,0.0007118533,0.0042334264,0.00042141657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934075,0.0042379894,0.000100316814,0.0005118402,0.0014519755,0.00029036647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00639893,0.00016541315,0.00022009976,0.2934871,0.00067216187,0.008534826,0.0005745547,0.000108563334,0.00005537278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009999512,0.00009422813,0.00008805052,0.6092474,0.00020832919,0.000634852,0.00042631608,0.00020970895,0.000039266022],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037209185,0.000017712362,0.061631102,0.000024541414,0.00006470767,0.000031694006,0.0003145836,0.00001354184,0.008782749,0.0014362845,0.008402296,0.9192436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007399039,0.0010066166,0.64411455,0.00015582771,0.00014594209,0.000010578461,0.0037506858,0.013826423,0.03740397,0.0030539145,0.29505354,0.00073806965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018116934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006560788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012103228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015505949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983397},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4395039141","doi":"10.32388/a0r0as","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395039141","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395110194","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2","title":"Mapping philanthropic support of science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Horizon 2020; McGill University; Division of Social and Economic Sciences; European Commission; John Templeton Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Science policy; Political science; Grant funding; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Public administration; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.48834292655917405,"score_gpt":0.5645723979618286,"score_spread":0.07622947140265451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395110194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048699,0.0014067705,0.0038406379,0.0009807579,0.04012762,0.00031393662,0.000010648033,0.000106579384,0.048343144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98635095,0.000022974009,0.0006544673,0.000019054653,0.00007583116,0.0000052219393,0.0000035203402,0.0000086943755,0.012859289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97869045,0.00006251483,0.0013358849,0.0018931844,0.017256334,0.00076163874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245083,0.000888793,0.00032050643,0.0020102107,0.0038733387,0.00045634576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07715288,0.00013421009,0.00029416627,0.08861807,0.00068542693,0.008094444,0.0021088643,0.000062107014,0.0023731976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02317191,0.000089746216,0.00019904207,0.3378834,0.004499798,0.0018007293,0.0009718345,0.00019791315,0.00056088384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043017253,0.00020317663,0.05707514,0.00008564986,0.000025819098,0.002062425,0.0027824822,0.00005637361,0.2952313,0.0071209287,0.39971566,0.23563674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062034254,0.00007703472,0.013887979,0.00004599576,0.000004660714,0.0004151127,0.0009474208,0.0029491922,0.06293135,0.08531346,0.83312064,0.00024511968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027142623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033425358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43340498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012158222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020040397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396539080","doi":"10.1515/9782760633964-008","title":"Le système universitaire canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.15787166763724966,"score_gpt":0.33956837966890135,"score_spread":0.1816967120316517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396539080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017463926,0.018877028,0.0017167289,0.0019751524,0.0005044491,0.00059085037,0.0008540635,0.00010653038,0.95791125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5283111,0.0015027305,0.00077032193,0.00008773361,0.00016599859,0.0000032623223,0.000043491855,0.00008257766,0.4690328],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899387,0.0003999645,0.00071476545,0.0014933798,0.0055987234,0.0018545166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899515,0.0019617493,0.00064874155,0.0014791241,0.0033392424,0.0026196437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004326903,0.0007444352,0.0009962183,0.021250531,0.0018475823,0.0010995297,0.0051884963,0.0012465524,0.0034864682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018283189,0.0007784766,0.0006001792,0.0058754575,0.0010978428,0.00047914122,0.004398303,0.0011455083,0.0010072164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041794707,0.00008854098,0.0065359394,0.00011944096,0.00045720456,0.008704498,0.0016916359,0.00095018116,0.0003172716,0.32765707,0.10407657,0.5489837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013450572,0.00044605916,0.0020858895,0.0001764239,0.0002119277,0.0004210917,0.0024715897,0.0023324115,0.00017644823,0.030352268,0.9590949,0.0008859294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24089274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15985015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010370159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004370124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396557051","doi":"10.32388/uobjiq","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396557051","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396578295","doi":"10.32388/9r05v4","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396578295","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396596501","doi":"10.1177/21582440231205390","title":"Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Mohaghegh Ardabili; Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences; University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Open science; Scientific communication; Engineering ethics; Citation; Science communication; Expansive; Preprint; Data science; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Science education","score_opus":0.9433554885989451,"score_gpt":0.7790298365108317,"score_spread":0.16432565208811345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396596501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2671284,0.10803941,0.0025370829,0.120702654,0.001493778,0.02444832,0.00050858414,0.000086339656,0.47505543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93858534,0.019015634,0.022607345,0.0033232837,0.000045312237,0.0008865214,0.000027095604,0.00004593288,0.015463512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992371,0.0008209473,0.00066802476,0.0017131777,0.003690292,0.0007365454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149597,0.0033604319,0.00011872109,0.0025899003,0.0018456376,0.0005893356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15644118,0.00013587733,0.0003745364,0.02497102,0.0009010788,0.29832506,0.09300002,0.000097796255,0.0011425896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038267955,0.00009874015,0.000035669033,0.18104282,0.0007789123,0.051123068,0.078171864,0.00052209065,0.0001400813],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081834165,0.00013744748,0.024513392,0.000012028172,0.000006415074,0.000010451548,0.00029542536,9.87089e-7,0.00027146938,0.013158642,0.03490667,0.9266052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010054052,0.00022531628,0.30248827,0.000126127,0.0000027310339,0.000005630893,0.00050009036,0.001899674,0.000093588234,0.23042631,0.46301943,0.00020742082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003716585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020462538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9263978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016874049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018722296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396624268","doi":"10.32388/44kcvv","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Physical geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396624268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396659980","doi":"10.1111/cid.13335","title":"25 years of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (CIDRR): A modern bibliometric and Altmetrics network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Dentistry; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Dental implant; Implant; Data science; Library science; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.7031867908895583,"score_gpt":0.6734345478697609,"score_spread":0.029752243019797397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396659980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393242,0.049765613,0.00037268724,0.00058238994,0.007879892,0.00066019146,0.00037420602,0.000070823786,0.00096999033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300169,0.0612322,0.00035899467,0.000021560552,0.0002862797,0.000017553843,0.000071639486,0.000047557132,0.007947337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670067,0.0071290345,0.0055582193,0.0034776267,0.014276858,0.0025515652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8853078,0.10565366,0.00058292487,0.0016726344,0.004282078,0.0025009064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20900962,0.00042566544,0.0019987293,0.27439576,0.0010684521,0.005545491,0.0026536963,0.002007065,0.00043790397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10727687,0.0003247811,0.0008271196,0.6655755,0.004284574,0.00080589013,0.0047158627,0.0069545843,0.00055035914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034186593,0.0006448867,0.2989008,0.00021677156,0.0025254802,0.04398157,0.00012163549,0.000036604644,0.00011141169,0.0017584614,0.065076455,0.58628404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019678557,0.0012027319,0.87512714,0.0002477896,0.00042325663,0.021091165,0.0003536087,0.05660621,0.000020179596,0.03123554,0.011187026,0.00053748244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003784606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053661228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5857466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007040801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008024323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396671953","doi":"10.1007/s10649-024-10328-2","title":"Editorial: paper collections, research retrieval, serendipity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Scholarship; Theme (computing); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6746776339002679,"score_gpt":0.6727593335651447,"score_spread":0.0019183003351231909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396671953","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009697798,0.014446251,0.000008316953,0.0028866597,0.9630785,0.00062807143,0.00034572114,0.00003564024,0.018473873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004982712,0.008440313,0.001098795,0.000011706038,0.83413666,0.00017093465,0.00005663852,0.00005609511,0.15597902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95497835,0.000879661,0.002142189,0.0016344865,0.03924197,0.0011233343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7853729,0.1804282,0.0005911151,0.0019848763,0.031208264,0.00041464707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.089602016,0.0004472667,0.001101701,0.06334915,0.0011080472,0.0044206516,0.0039415983,0.0010967652,0.0013127638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59786236,0.00032617906,0.000291689,0.2235677,0.0009794983,0.00045361032,0.0027149569,0.0039994144,0.0032379057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015203518,0.0004931416,0.000034146127,0.0002922794,0.00012011103,0.00000466269,0.0013981672,0.0000044934245,0.000003456822,0.0027171632,0.9947553,0.00016184327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011918717,0.00006285095,0.00001655411,0.0001973293,0.000014006664,0.0000011757962,0.0025354112,0.00003974414,0.00000318781,0.34584567,0.6509543,0.00021056246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011839499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017401642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002786614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051115877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396803880","doi":"10.32388/0tcepl","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396803880","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396885512","doi":"10.22215/adr/23.01fs","title":"RESEARCH REVIEW : Research for a Changing World: From research chairs to groundbreaking projects, our innovative faculty are responding to the questions and challenges of today.From research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.9714501093655866,"score_gpt":0.7501551133869951,"score_spread":0.22129499597859148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396885512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017265152,0.2866724,0.0020163287,0.52350444,0.005472426,0.054031737,0.013327946,0.00044294415,0.097266644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16935295,0.3589876,0.00944538,0.00043632273,0.007901408,0.019485664,0.000705585,0.0008151502,0.43286994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78676414,0.031549264,0.0060331924,0.010014219,0.15380126,0.0118379155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5263096,0.20861799,0.0011853488,0.007899281,0.25343677,0.002550966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6741732,0.0008550261,0.0027000841,0.5165922,0.006637734,0.0069424696,0.013417668,0.0008729756,0.00023694773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.62943804,0.00055642787,0.00045263505,0.7579263,0.0013696656,0.00086762133,0.025566833,0.009950509,0.0009956701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033848488,0.00024332257,0.0007854712,0.0012930799,0.00022192304,0.00011253115,0.0046405136,0.0000076201577,0.00014219133,0.00920788,0.764194,0.21881296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035414062,0.0009752982,0.008858335,0.01418005,0.00001655696,0.000006941841,0.09925099,0.00015194491,0.00020147057,0.008382247,0.8670185,0.0006035087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022971176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0159025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5230681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039460384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009564923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987763},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4396932075","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-01437-2","title":"I’m worried I’ve been contacted by a predatory publisher — how do I find out?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.27653534100049176,"score_gpt":0.5217601496840361,"score_spread":0.2452248086835443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396932075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5520138,0.1521167,0.0026424013,0.068320274,0.025695687,0.0019295168,0.0023721945,0.0007784121,0.19413102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878253,0.00010635983,0.0002227803,0.0007727643,0.0002465753,0.00001584425,0.000040424737,0.00002334659,0.120318934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793447,0.00020017975,0.00038247945,0.0011399981,0.009648243,0.0006946087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291164,0.0032820685,0.00010719546,0.00084796076,0.0023135035,0.00053764664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009544859,0.00021801435,0.0003227067,0.03025654,0.00017715826,0.019587964,0.0027986031,0.001669414,0.0024888823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03253721,0.00014048378,0.000211181,0.13407907,0.00012264351,0.0019583772,0.00060865504,0.0037754648,0.0005960361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014277217,0.000042479238,0.0041629677,0.0000073259885,0.00002985231,0.00004122438,0.00016312668,3.4803355e-7,0.0013485076,0.00063027523,0.9234303,0.07012928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029226101,0.000070199756,0.011161149,0.000017320046,0.000007152694,0.00000505453,0.00025868593,0.0007713254,0.0005848683,0.002908412,0.9837101,0.00021343256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010402164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014575827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32623917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016131523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036204795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397019241","doi":"10.1515/9782760640795-005","title":"Les problèmes récurrents du financement universitaire au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.15056011853705736,"score_gpt":0.3490336984590258,"score_spread":0.19847357992196846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397019241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14797358,0.018612802,0.0041538887,0.0029833023,0.0009573569,0.001387032,0.0007504305,0.00011919114,0.8230624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61810493,0.00437765,0.0006983525,0.00007916472,0.00017368564,0.0000062362205,0.00004312731,0.00007771327,0.37643915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99014807,0.00033385426,0.00084969535,0.0017177286,0.005180593,0.0017700448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992181,0.0025008563,0.00090896274,0.0014233772,0.001949193,0.0010366085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660354,0.0009036576,0.0010474606,0.015169706,0.0022712739,0.0009403592,0.004840468,0.0010444738,0.006481715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011368295,0.0008661735,0.0007997939,0.0040455596,0.0010136674,0.00047889273,0.005095672,0.001158531,0.0014722992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038766296,0.00015709356,0.12500301,0.00020250995,0.0003320374,0.0010080701,0.0019394999,0.0008382453,0.00022151851,0.030103229,0.015183647,0.82462347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016832696,0.000663051,0.03836426,0.00042127748,0.00026609498,0.000096704265,0.0014908778,0.0035648553,0.00036707777,0.0018685021,0.9501961,0.0010179674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34214312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20387094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9350124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010178492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003501205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397290146","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v47i1.18648","title":"Call for papers: Current issues in scholarly publishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.2731512417955865,"score_gpt":0.4780085867536388,"score_spread":0.2048573449580523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397290146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033645086,0.20397128,0.0020630825,0.07412746,0.04588745,0.0017520849,0.002880279,0.000024023087,0.63564926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63115853,0.047359522,0.014396674,0.013748389,0.0049731205,0.00006121553,0.0004532792,0.000120782424,0.28772852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325424,0.00006994656,0.0014060462,0.00028897988,0.004344666,0.00063611567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933906,0.00082895753,0.0006602031,0.00027951124,0.0030343784,0.0018063127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01928052,0.0001650812,0.0003546793,0.13348448,0.00034944242,0.12322543,0.004170115,0.0001860746,0.0011708769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03421052,0.000113402675,0.00012444794,0.090730034,0.00043454283,0.09717987,0.00027845913,0.0011485793,0.00051093864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000480983,0.0000029091505,0.001155177,0.00004002387,0.000002584027,0.0000046638493,0.0006600862,0.0000293925,0.0000025973388,0.0017706606,0.74475133,0.25157574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018583013,0.00008882114,0.00369212,0.00021073117,0.0000021555372,0.00002403868,0.00066285476,0.0010209086,0.000022580363,0.0019727168,0.99197555,0.00014172148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063199335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000361108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59751344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002247907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015306014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398141597","doi":"10.32388/7rc4sy","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398141597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398246959","doi":"10.1200/go.23.00287","title":"Global Landscape of the Attack of Predatory Journals in Oncology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JCO Global Oncology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Genentech; European Society for Medical Oncology","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Psychological intervention; Descriptive statistics; Medicine; Clinical Oncology; Odds ratio; Feeling; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical education; Political science; Internal medicine; Cancer; Social psychology; Nursing; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.5602366891606101,"score_gpt":0.6480163093402614,"score_spread":0.08777962017965135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398246959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85793674,0.008724759,0.00020489408,0.004332144,0.002859119,0.00026339418,0.00030144502,0.00001249677,0.12536499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865204,0.00033392877,0.00028128448,0.00020312372,0.000093060095,0.0000057314255,8.2870605e-7,0.0000037584962,0.00042624382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283963,0.00087275123,0.0012886021,0.0005165164,0.003955481,0.0005270214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939727,0.0034149864,0.0004186604,0.0006021831,0.0013746019,0.00021686952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016626745,0.00012976222,0.0006294917,0.0075025605,0.000051874507,0.00021903182,0.0026874708,0.00038189284,0.0009630299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014716134,0.0000735774,0.00027524043,0.13269792,0.00043770668,0.00025235928,0.0011429733,0.00032319606,0.0001233244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008568843,0.00035994823,0.6272141,0.000018455328,0.00003966454,0.000091624286,0.00008787103,0.00029873356,0.00016847864,0.005480095,0.11933429,0.2468211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005980243,0.0006628753,0.60482055,0.000030201321,0.000012081048,0.00009642965,0.00035582483,0.0022922088,0.00007564383,0.013563184,0.3774094,0.00008359729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017231744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008192861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25807512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009637513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024092821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995023},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4398453333","doi":"10.7910/dvn/hgihgc/38uvjq","title":"meta analysis - correlations.R","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.6242485153176885,"score_gpt":0.5224753220057434,"score_spread":0.10177319331194512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398453333","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016170769,0.000023565754,0.0019847811,0.00008547728,0.0006238973,0.0002782013,0.9964502,0.000032030377,0.0005202429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000032397944,0.0005911826,0.00055581715,0.0006825831,0.00016174323,0.00002583074,0.99535626,0.000012792629,0.002581371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817555,0.00058704044,0.0012546353,0.0017792481,0.013978422,0.0006451478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866261,0.0052308533,0.0007866842,0.0043180366,0.0021067543,0.00093158387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012218264,0.00041424917,0.0017644069,0.099602774,0.00033275704,0.004608999,0.007744121,0.00041341854,0.2513237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038428627,0.00028721968,0.002134755,0.33450553,0.00020903519,0.00087253243,0.0034397177,0.0009012987,0.62637967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001123293,0.00007403618,0.0000675797,0.0000058289893,0.024880502,0.00009598456,0.000006564965,0.000095904485,5.817343e-7,0.000028231536,0.97446775,0.0002657923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013635198,0.000042820924,0.00022570201,6.770362e-7,0.053698756,0.0000025509667,0.000033602242,0.0012117712,0.0000014740848,0.00021433824,0.94412637,0.00030558233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006418034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021272151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.375056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109324144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043477566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398481290","doi":"10.7910/dvn/ahmb8g/cuowp6","title":"Journal Editors Supplementary 2 - Survey.docx","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.4029767155916954,"score_gpt":0.5055364608877881,"score_spread":0.10255974529609274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398481290","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003445531,0.0000047998224,0.00012457748,0.00011941899,0.016792104,0.0002800096,0.98254704,0.000013271136,0.00008429807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000015519729,0.0013060573,0.00031156346,0.00075425487,0.0068150917,0.0000070828187,0.9902823,0.000025534195,0.00048259855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.973719,0.0014022572,0.0017425761,0.0014978478,0.02047485,0.0011634743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846496,0.0063690655,0.0010736138,0.0028386612,0.0032395413,0.0018295475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038348205,0.00050693523,0.0009228767,0.047530953,0.0006051863,0.0091401655,0.011918356,0.00042809432,0.30645058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090913065,0.00037270715,0.00042254743,0.098561615,0.00027714513,0.001095766,0.005216793,0.0020583703,0.41409647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006224457,0.00012223488,0.0011070278,0.000011708617,0.00007775054,0.0005157327,0.000008716458,0.0000026259008,0.0000034463337,0.0000013679062,0.99594283,0.0021442939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057220424,0.00021264088,0.0020963696,0.000012659096,0.000039878898,0.000055615823,0.00011282487,0.000046083165,0.000008700356,0.00012783137,0.9962849,0.00043029487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017142735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041292925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107645914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003085258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012229409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398755802","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20241032","title":"Teaching-Track Faculty at US National Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Fast track; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3531765029643348,"score_gpt":0.5248627467509461,"score_spread":0.17168624378661135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398755802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7510279,0.0006679698,0.0000042555853,0.0020455637,0.00016411708,0.000055626002,0.00004158395,0.000041259384,0.24595171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93122977,0.00011369737,0.00018127308,0.00021591126,0.00009256648,0.0000021131054,0.000004787674,0.000006352905,0.06815353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950155,0.000012256755,0.00020318311,0.0005175849,0.0039596735,0.0002917713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811244,0.0007327194,0.00004364275,0.000059113776,0.0008312272,0.00022083377],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005322268,0.00010596565,0.00012800962,0.010125864,0.00045227192,0.0025146685,0.0005240129,0.00007864404,0.0005914896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016598419,0.000071111965,0.00007710618,0.02113296,0.00013999708,0.00071477285,0.00039518654,0.00022436591,0.00024084617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005060154,0.00006457355,0.16914517,0.00008261853,0.00007836634,0.000039862774,0.0046832003,0.00000462289,0.00871556,0.14115117,0.49068433,0.18529992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014376869,0.00008157827,0.06197361,0.000014803449,0.0000054317966,0.000035481542,0.0021665068,0.0024251745,0.0002288243,0.00507524,0.9276995,0.00015010318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089198336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061849864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43701515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017514409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117138974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398772376","doi":"10.32388/80amlu","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398772376","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398872514","doi":"10.7910/dvn/qkcpxu/wxmihz","title":"menage.xlsx","year":2013,"lang":"id","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.37656219518512885,"score_gpt":0.4876267573558552,"score_spread":0.11106456217072636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398872514","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034740393,0.000041682742,0.0003706415,0.00008547324,0.0057472955,0.0013081214,0.98303956,0.00006246098,0.008997342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00020221125,0.008841907,0.001094278,0.000989996,0.00087762985,0.00009420101,0.92588675,0.000076168166,0.061936848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667517,0.0010554604,0.0023697081,0.0035435432,0.023590494,0.0026891085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753828,0.00643942,0.0013904803,0.008928576,0.005191216,0.0026674923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0247277,0.0011130504,0.0016261921,0.10216823,0.001042937,0.016940065,0.018165683,0.0012501448,0.5679526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059758075,0.00084605947,0.00072144635,0.1877176,0.0010045359,0.0033068026,0.012157369,0.0021805514,0.9634408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004014474,0.00050691166,0.00016646924,0.00007445766,0.00013368859,0.00034181043,0.00003252118,0.000003785247,0.000080562546,0.00012891043,0.9803468,0.018143961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009893557,0.00032201875,0.00082197244,0.000084353494,0.00010275765,0.000040918458,0.0003824247,0.00093930296,0.0000697131,0.0003066967,0.994895,0.0010455253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018678152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095108786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3954882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053246086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012831432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399025610","doi":"10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.05.012","title":"The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IBRO Neuroscience Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Normalization (sociology); Bibliometrics; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4586648364662728,"score_gpt":0.5918024455882914,"score_spread":0.1331376091220186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399025610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98725784,0.0018406947,0.0015177687,0.0023584603,0.005079259,0.0003775658,0.000040066927,0.00014910114,0.0013792393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958766,0.0003071762,0.00007605385,0.0002967553,0.00008539264,0.000032223605,0.000001668068,0.000021275773,0.003302829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695657,0.0009967244,0.0022204875,0.0033962943,0.021170877,0.0026499357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98359156,0.011162761,0.0006257153,0.0024117674,0.0011178823,0.0010903212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.112865366,0.00038511565,0.00061764783,0.11140706,0.0023209017,0.035140194,0.0045672324,0.00016723394,0.0000564547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14645363,0.00022794095,0.00051033485,0.71747005,0.00249105,0.0026747894,0.0018185343,0.00073208194,0.000047542104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165589,0.00011062672,0.9616446,0.000010742408,0.0000066371317,0.0028107772,0.0006275036,0.00096436817,0.0053305505,0.0014859834,0.0016699644,0.025321696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086502216,0.00009902433,0.79879284,0.000019373952,0.000025530177,0.00064785755,0.00028930508,0.052342143,0.00045953752,0.004530631,0.14235716,0.00035008564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000502534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011757045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.606063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003392509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009718444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399408566","doi":"10.1515/9782760625648-019","title":"Quand les citoyens québécois font la science","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.16268470186247194,"score_gpt":0.35972582926575014,"score_spread":0.1970411274032782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399408566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058479026,0.02419872,0.0035054886,0.0014948377,0.0004117678,0.0006321709,0.0003062478,0.00012334304,0.9108484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7231339,0.009234979,0.0034945218,0.00027822625,0.00023353417,0.000007385293,0.000013250675,0.00008583465,0.26351833],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857102,0.00039610278,0.0009690896,0.0020837872,0.008673719,0.002167072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777056,0.004921897,0.0007592835,0.0017240212,0.002936112,0.0018881282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008630571,0.0008692746,0.001019475,0.032936063,0.0030706192,0.0032408596,0.0071851346,0.0011533988,0.003032179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044440893,0.00080118235,0.0007088373,0.010546969,0.0040286025,0.00061520294,0.0039899475,0.0015265516,0.0004983885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023030986,0.00010497904,0.005705628,0.000046866542,0.00009709843,0.0016634697,0.0014213568,0.00023772595,0.0037019001,0.0624257,0.005853372,0.91851157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010214443,0.0005001135,0.023619426,0.00022768314,0.00016224463,0.00037274294,0.0009451616,0.0030419244,0.002253723,0.020047186,0.94681937,0.0009889676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10427811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0546946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032569568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021134987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399808942","doi":"10.1177/14740222241261034","title":"Valuing humanities: Rethinking the humanities-impact landscape in Denmark","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arts and Humanities in Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Sociology; Humanities; Face (sociological concept); Linguistic landscape; Social science; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6344845298545373,"score_gpt":0.547085083257939,"score_spread":0.08739944659659826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399808942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040006,0.015400527,0.000009943889,0.0012013068,0.0028138664,0.00028824512,0.000010215407,0.000034285717,0.17624103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95049393,0.0003601011,0.00003244676,0.0006920858,0.0005576315,0.000052726282,0.000008336328,0.000019418696,0.047783297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959134,0.00023780696,0.000634573,0.0005489075,0.0021730212,0.00049230753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954959,0.003449751,0.000102026555,0.0004592689,0.0004406472,0.00005240493],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008086324,0.0001920584,0.00023979865,0.019830104,0.0006107606,0.009677907,0.0008665105,0.00009090121,0.005059066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009029732,0.000120652,0.00008936564,0.014606719,0.00035039932,0.0011897613,0.00027389012,0.00049105193,0.00011641019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023180191,0.000243341,0.10696275,0.000097799966,0.000035121553,0.000033821932,0.07085108,0.00006757826,0.00003932581,0.70485526,0.06905616,0.047734585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018828239,0.000111111454,0.36802897,0.00020317487,0.000009369191,0.000012912994,0.015054581,0.00094559824,0.000008884671,0.16647409,0.44868127,0.0002817825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091358845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010497995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53838116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026497984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003880721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99585044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839637","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-005","title":"4 Association canadienne-française pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.18127892601113552,"score_gpt":0.3533441170281054,"score_spread":0.1720651910169699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12272487,0.019957345,0.0011647012,0.0015767456,0.00041376526,0.00053976575,0.00052970956,0.00007129873,0.8530218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39199603,0.014264855,0.0038181671,0.00030429158,0.0002509149,0.000013034644,0.000023764656,0.00007216537,0.58925676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892433,0.00038473302,0.00085908716,0.001498533,0.0054128533,0.0026014391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913609,0.0037834079,0.000813151,0.0008144767,0.001698683,0.001529376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008048306,0.0006720003,0.00078168977,0.017620021,0.003809283,0.0017283842,0.0038701885,0.00088911504,0.022924965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002812624,0.00064518687,0.0005324006,0.006366909,0.0017408894,0.0004914414,0.0015988918,0.00084640196,0.0011248233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021232382,0.00010292761,0.040779132,0.000060409686,0.00029505088,0.0007754937,0.0017004672,0.0017654505,0.00074839336,0.020126242,0.028365945,0.90506816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009921053,0.0004239818,0.012859097,0.0002014352,0.00021368416,0.00007946629,0.00060514634,0.0047980635,0.0008244075,0.046169,0.9320543,0.0007793212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18982331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24956669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010407941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013848598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839761","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-021","title":"20 Association canadienne-français pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.1796691582606232,"score_gpt":0.35241829399144176,"score_spread":0.17274913573081854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10719127,0.018055165,0.0013707206,0.0013293449,0.0004254938,0.0005144201,0.00066877744,0.00006969914,0.8703751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42518345,0.0120459795,0.004113422,0.0003326372,0.00026479783,0.000012604497,0.000030319788,0.000073293624,0.5579435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890032,0.00038652748,0.00087592466,0.0015312718,0.005561889,0.002641213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912832,0.0038171993,0.00080011436,0.0008142895,0.0017767649,0.0015084341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007996181,0.00068388745,0.00080938207,0.018002233,0.0038489802,0.0018545568,0.003952844,0.0009179854,0.021170007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026273238,0.0006564872,0.00054581487,0.006752908,0.0017150602,0.00051163527,0.0016209953,0.00086663425,0.0013001536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019462808,0.000098324446,0.053264093,0.000058051224,0.00027885035,0.0007097428,0.0019592524,0.0019801564,0.00094190525,0.017376415,0.024253529,0.8988851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010066825,0.00044471107,0.018621145,0.00020347704,0.0001941136,0.00008116761,0.0006717065,0.005351578,0.0009841933,0.046267185,0.92534566,0.00082836347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18932368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26059318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105510615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013197192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399839812","doi":"10.1515/9782760623354-051","title":"50 Association canadienne-française pour l’avancement des sciences","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art","score_opus":0.17993925600474356,"score_gpt":0.35299938014194615,"score_spread":0.1730601241372026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399839812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119714946,0.022701228,0.0016777569,0.0013440815,0.00044059544,0.00057067553,0.000563035,0.00007467105,0.852913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40876794,0.01647223,0.006041744,0.00035671928,0.00029627865,0.000015693235,0.000028650345,0.00008518515,0.5679356],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889941,0.00039615005,0.00088294083,0.0015395781,0.0055407686,0.0026464425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125135,0.0038605332,0.00083906465,0.00083626324,0.0016530481,0.0015597492],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081558125,0.00069110165,0.00080904725,0.01820155,0.0038533984,0.0017835647,0.0039556487,0.0009086636,0.0196815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027379945,0.00066332315,0.00054811395,0.0060893204,0.0017565251,0.0005150643,0.0016370146,0.0008697683,0.0011195512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024564407,0.00011631878,0.04177352,0.00006670695,0.00027433535,0.0005930165,0.0018319061,0.0019598952,0.0011629583,0.024414165,0.020679835,0.9068817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009423268,0.00041249712,0.0139905345,0.00019929862,0.00017990862,0.00007685153,0.0006213767,0.0032882,0.0006832045,0.04205038,0.9367904,0.00076501386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2012393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.231715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010683675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001459679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399859124","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2024.2370144","title":"Exploring the structure of relative age effects research using citation network analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sports Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Nipissing University; Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Citation analysis; Age structure; Citation; Network analysis; Computer science; Psychology; Demography; Engineering; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.8128957515660077,"score_gpt":0.620776158146938,"score_spread":0.1921195934190697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399859124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894376,0.00352214,0.004567751,0.00037524392,0.0014361112,0.000106376276,0.0000026024659,0.0000035283715,0.00054867205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584526,0.0003418722,0.0034122735,0.000010055861,0.00027441562,3.7226357e-7,1.6112493e-7,0.000003938986,0.000111637244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98140633,0.0005053824,0.0009780376,0.00036586117,0.016281974,0.00046241903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98399234,0.011723288,0.0005655198,0.00029653343,0.0032390344,0.00018328855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07313681,0.00009483469,0.00037615595,0.059690073,0.00060789904,0.0022508278,0.0019088903,0.000045680754,0.00011692211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015278028,0.000044103643,0.0003155857,0.3825689,0.0008837431,0.001990825,0.00027260193,0.0005968724,0.0000027370018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073004034,0.00008931636,0.42121887,0.000065090615,0.00062509207,0.00093642535,0.0077722264,0.22673072,0.015489027,0.022164142,0.0041273437,0.30070877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012876111,0.00047622292,0.7552796,0.00029982912,0.00019153682,0.000056901536,0.0037374469,0.05223038,0.0030611737,0.18312502,0.0012503578,0.00016279523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044935074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001200676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33406073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010149168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004928822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228654","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0087","title":"Tens of Thousands of American Academics on the Editorial Boards of Journals Run by Predatory Publishers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Advertising; Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.40426981837671777,"score_gpt":0.5168890013989549,"score_spread":0.11261918302223711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424108,0.007917002,0.0010882587,0.018409472,0.02482693,0.00019289531,0.0003158873,0.000012858756,0.0048258435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127275,0.0008380485,0.0006200626,0.00021162807,0.0066773156,0.0000013611723,0.0000015667641,0.000025503494,0.00035176994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685999,0.0008649876,0.0030414022,0.00041820566,0.026523769,0.00055171695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564618,0.014290655,0.0041016056,0.0007844945,0.02370573,0.00065571314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13190149,0.0002007997,0.0008460734,0.04001811,0.00016848782,0.056313735,0.0071687116,0.00038417068,0.00023607828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28348705,0.0001089885,0.00060326443,0.101138815,0.00054898043,0.059428696,0.0007198595,0.004945384,0.0000036666045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010303448,0.00013124604,0.03508885,0.000020475274,0.00014592591,0.0000071653726,0.0004188835,0.000051239054,0.016254093,0.0005667746,0.90497464,0.042237684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011575242,0.002193478,0.027321829,0.0006457566,0.0000968939,0.000067460525,0.008683811,0.0007597872,0.01630404,0.010164922,0.93226063,0.00034384674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009622658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015882567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15158556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002212068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015312108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400491789","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24309987","title":"What’s in a name? Protocol for a bibliometric and content analysis of rehabilitation, reablement, reactivation, and restorative health care services","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto; Sinai Health System; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Rehabilitation; Content analysis; Medicine; Sociology; Physical therapy; Alternative medicine; Social science; Pathology","score_opus":0.5592799480167934,"score_gpt":0.6063755701848107,"score_spread":0.047095622168017326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400491789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9015639,0.0061461357,0.00038399312,0.0051837997,0.00033513602,0.085777,0.0004955637,0.000021655016,0.0000928558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85202837,0.0010955879,0.004512947,0.00015898043,0.000052622046,0.14167207,0.000115567615,0.000036182882,0.00032768483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909453,0.00061012345,0.0019442397,0.0015869669,0.004474433,0.0004389716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827843,0.007854989,0.0012323643,0.0009151121,0.0069129732,0.00030026678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026792629,0.00028057554,0.001120299,0.5855142,0.00013529744,0.0030431172,0.0009639921,0.00021664701,0.000037824906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019570868,0.00020262352,0.00021763405,0.64601153,0.00020504078,0.0006338358,0.0018169319,0.00043707425,0.0000020604132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018351567,0.0001871818,0.8984273,0.0027518128,0.00033895764,0.0000023672571,0.0109875705,0.000117238065,0.000073868214,0.00060492574,0.0015705164,0.08475472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010712591,0.0007889406,0.944469,0.00063724007,0.000093778755,5.1710657e-7,0.022238892,0.007913304,0.000082820334,0.012631075,0.009801956,0.00027127058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019693687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022858176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08448345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033169787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000658497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400603791","doi":"10.1057/s41599-024-03402-w","title":"A global perspective on social stratification in science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities and Social Sciences Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Social stratification; Stratification (seeds); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.8418635650661227,"score_gpt":0.6485417079199942,"score_spread":0.19332185714612848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400603791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38052717,0.0030253273,0.00021346947,0.035831355,0.0003969758,0.00036909364,0.00009051723,0.000085393694,0.5794607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988352,0.00021155427,0.00019541649,0.00025553614,0.00006613706,0.000020322635,0.0000016645354,0.0000026880036,0.0004114957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950672,0.00022631297,0.00034243584,0.0005570581,0.0034154276,0.00039160048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972903,0.0013335004,0.00007325169,0.00038376963,0.000873798,0.000045340916],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011436068,0.000094625066,0.00014426072,0.0098600555,0.004178686,0.007632699,0.0033076815,0.00005365594,0.000075393415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001820853,0.00007308404,0.00006024247,0.07097516,0.0053986935,0.0010461,0.0007893745,0.00021208894,0.000049341354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015754309,0.000048957798,0.0013104127,0.0000015516221,0.0000016732588,6.2691214e-7,0.0063905483,0.000002075349,0.000025315323,0.96634746,0.0014659612,0.024403842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001779633,0.0001612384,0.28400186,0.000019929588,0.0000056865456,0.0000036664553,0.12820774,0.01324933,0.000010316313,0.5304404,0.043434765,0.00028714509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007341108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.618308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060384773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006406401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400764333","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2024-0033","title":"On increasing equity and inclusion of early-career professionals for conferences and conference networking in Canadian fisheries and aquatic science societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Algoma University; University of New Brunswick; University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University; Trent University; Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Equity (law); Fishery; Inclusion (mineral); Ecology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Social science","score_opus":0.4086659153645837,"score_gpt":0.4795522297439904,"score_spread":0.07088631437940673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400764333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843912,0.006404698,0.00012501382,0.007393787,0.0004258333,0.00020574096,0.000015584284,0.000002128727,0.0010359944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983161,0.0005153057,0.0008161886,0.00023077747,0.00004129456,0.0000035256933,3.6885106e-7,0.000004823329,0.00007161009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555033,0.00016578399,0.00067406934,0.0004799483,0.0024218145,0.00070806267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930283,0.0049862103,0.00025991444,0.00012527918,0.00044113817,0.0011591908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0264798,0.0001617803,0.0004102223,0.010723206,0.0020490023,0.0046660113,0.00095248834,0.00009015862,0.000032144824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01313426,0.0001076638,0.000039227918,0.013291852,0.004334967,0.001380647,0.0008256033,0.00022912245,2.5128804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002788502,0.000010223734,0.69408894,0.0000731277,0.000012068311,0.00002395613,0.009613903,0.0000021689068,0.00018155226,0.0072003226,0.00080940017,0.28795645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053916656,0.0017114666,0.54422045,0.0015799734,0.000025551715,0.00010322017,0.01698472,0.07269703,0.00015461851,0.3568728,0.0046648136,0.0004462207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12320194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23434506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34967247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117731826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007481737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400876817","doi":"10.3138/jammi-2024-0209","title":"If a tree falls in the forest: Publication inflation in infectious diseases","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Inflation (cosmology); Forestry; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05035293740498988,"score_gpt":0.39548651174283755,"score_spread":0.3451335743378477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400876817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744671,0.0014973347,0.00006190433,0.022603571,0.00087751175,0.00014702932,0.00004015696,0.000002969632,0.00030241394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986237,0.00032090247,0.0000011319241,0.0008483824,0.000104038605,0.0000046748296,0.000004201797,0.0000029876533,0.000089944784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957129,0.0008450358,0.00080580486,0.00016619182,0.002259296,0.00021079744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922634,0.005849097,0.0005841414,0.00018179943,0.0009204964,0.0002011027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012502164,0.00007836729,0.00022423932,0.004600391,0.000086718996,0.00027847837,0.0007881299,0.00013336414,0.00006839111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06723107,0.000040006107,0.000112294605,0.016521435,0.00009392579,0.00027968522,0.00012772436,0.00047987304,0.0000016517102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001400528,0.000084092426,0.9559162,0.000011721696,0.000025007468,0.000015111919,0.00009210881,0.00009313102,0.000044793145,0.0010794239,0.029494187,0.013130204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005360985,0.00005322657,0.9707979,0.000049613955,0.000018784567,0.0000257994,0.00008500919,0.0012336473,0.0000059884796,0.006114381,0.021029657,0.000049913902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01130843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18854064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1772322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006102979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002308772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400889509","doi":"10.14746/eip.2024.1.7","title":"The COPE / DOAJ / OASPA / WAME Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing: A Critical Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ETHICS IN PROGRESS","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Psychiatric Nurses Association; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publishing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7033057739797399,"score_gpt":0.6590939185420052,"score_spread":0.04421185543773476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400889509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5213678,0.21514313,0.003776154,0.2335074,0.0016659809,0.000987855,0.00013527482,0.00006388812,0.023352548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919603,0.0052635907,0.002245391,0.00008581147,0.0000328402,0.000036493944,0.0000019724505,0.000009447431,0.00036415114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858831,0.0015101114,0.0012274251,0.0008938917,0.00988006,0.0006053975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921594,0.100930244,0.0001830386,0.000894607,0.0055244463,0.00030827592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11233641,0.00014070269,0.00036112044,0.03706586,0.0002545171,0.030239068,0.002374911,0.0003822376,0.00006847764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47006303,0.00008504399,0.00012115496,0.22532862,0.001168594,0.006455798,0.0006390953,0.003238903,0.000019055098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008502002,0.00071145024,0.47679713,0.00013034868,0.00014540064,0.00029740157,0.007942379,0.00007375696,0.000030559804,0.3168054,0.0004277511,0.19655338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012101982,0.0009902632,0.32164863,0.0007740435,0.000342738,0.000053666292,0.021886077,0.08574428,0.00043807668,0.20552357,0.36046815,0.0009203185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033875523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010073294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47059253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008501628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000670113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400913915","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3002715","title":"“Best Paper” awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Biology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Publication; Openness to experience; Incentive; Best practice; Open science; Public relations; Discipline; Subject (documents); Political science; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7044528693036902,"score_gpt":0.6304489793274004,"score_spread":0.07400388997628982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400913915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85217106,0.0061741727,0.012471838,0.021323137,0.003368112,0.0027462638,0.0012647363,0.00014377348,0.1003369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390286,0.00040127363,0.0014001601,0.00037949943,0.00009455505,0.000059675334,0.000009227442,0.000009663654,0.0037430886],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537617,0.000109335066,0.00047705477,0.0012543794,0.0020865411,0.00069649715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940268,0.0037529534,0.00006177446,0.0005601847,0.001218946,0.0003793602],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020473458,0.00013503118,0.00033074635,0.019450396,0.00047188584,0.0037793408,0.0051109465,0.00012711319,0.00078168267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015333325,0.0000855564,0.0000724056,0.069425754,0.001046889,0.0009823735,0.0032584565,0.0001782736,0.00030850343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070163784,0.0004515756,0.08800731,0.00007851553,0.000054972195,0.000035645357,0.00060110126,0.0000024139276,0.098730646,0.06531155,0.016036937,0.7306192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008559258,0.002312727,0.028952653,0.000037994432,0.000030529023,0.000046741745,0.00026007212,0.014667848,0.011850964,0.16659807,0.7738578,0.00052869914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010720045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006718217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75782084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007396191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008901834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99725485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401023281","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.24.604934","title":"“I’d like to think I’d be able to spot one if I saw one”: How science journalists navigate predatory journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Journalism; Public relations; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Credibility; Political science; Trustworthiness; Newspaper; Perception; Citizen science; Internet privacy; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3049552395082844,"score_gpt":0.45338592290999924,"score_spread":0.14843068340171484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401023281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96066445,0.0066857105,0.0034260985,0.017096471,0.008343795,0.0020644409,0.0011404154,0.0003946038,0.00018400184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97763175,0.0008752859,0.017284356,0.0020843097,0.0012333142,0.0001417543,1.9865381e-7,0.0001894537,0.00055958884],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.96379054,0.000602837,0.0021586453,0.004561971,0.025897935,0.0029880973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96891534,0.0014989437,0.0011697332,0.0053289314,0.01753392,0.0055531138],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.069041006,0.0010720117,0.0016916116,0.08948453,0.0013727371,0.04089863,0.013869947,0.00089072087,0.0007457523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045179684,0.0009491508,0.00058510335,0.22081825,0.0007155662,0.0016923097,0.015279866,0.0040637413,0.0025355306],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001228717,0.00065990456,0.005012706,0.00031269412,0.0002798151,0.00047647848,0.00021351557,0.00064281374,0.9407757,0.0014723485,0.049688637,0.00034253453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012154978,0.0010310152,0.2447003,0.0041947155,0.00026762285,0.0000010494598,0.00012696226,0.003251951,0.5065829,0.0010981332,0.23266652,0.004863285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001280758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009494363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43419275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021312432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006608518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992734},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4401280043","doi":"10.29173/jchla29752","title":"Scopus Search Analyzer","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Bar chart; Computer science; Spectrum analyzer; Information retrieval; Data mining; Data science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0814748000887435,"score_gpt":0.4439825608021105,"score_spread":0.362507760713367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401280043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5477408,0.20134775,0.0024166175,0.22760068,0.011763011,0.00062292337,0.0008756399,0.0000612206,0.00757133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97214806,0.0120883,0.0010776356,0.008491019,0.0021552956,0.0000023295495,0.000003143975,0.00003693315,0.0039972966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814178,0.005259668,0.0019009823,0.0003036925,0.009304947,0.001812924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97194344,0.01779389,0.0024976293,0.0003584811,0.00457176,0.0028348288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.083538994,0.00023265793,0.00060677656,0.011495457,0.0015975572,0.01663063,0.0024402917,0.00046036628,0.0007834201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080083475,0.00016371222,0.0004922507,0.029642286,0.00007294556,0.0019845513,0.00015959742,0.0025189521,0.000013818159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011004896,0.000017004051,0.31687862,0.000013273495,0.00017228951,0.00019111796,0.00073011406,0.00045456996,0.000013962947,0.00088489923,0.67431396,0.006319204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004022838,0.00010340639,0.2692243,0.00011798848,0.000037463007,0.0007330877,0.0007042997,0.0040679793,0.000111774505,0.01143446,0.71284676,0.00021620745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2924953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42570457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4244072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054698803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11348211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401316491","doi":"10.32388/z2x3mo","title":"Review of: \"Mapping the Canadian Research Landscape in 2023\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Regional science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.8759368815138101,"score_gpt":0.6685511741176582,"score_spread":0.20738570739615192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401316491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000022781646,0.52089024,0.0000028250026,0.2192004,0.0014437255,0.0007956608,0.00024472093,0.0000049384257,0.25741524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011373261,0.5352467,0.00004389925,0.0062271045,0.00018405866,0.00007667997,0.0000703261,0.000017210203,0.45802033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678578,0.0017512566,0.0021977448,0.0014224681,0.02528389,0.0014868383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601204,0.018063156,0.0004141699,0.0035058842,0.016860142,0.00103624],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24201514,0.0002928942,0.0012686428,0.17121165,0.00031976736,0.0023059773,0.0089989025,0.00037026216,0.023049349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17390917,0.00014300802,0.00047904617,0.5438891,0.00034685386,0.00016517147,0.0020852895,0.0030284245,0.0058093606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.162506e-7,0.000012047845,0.00016390468,0.008065206,0.000012733745,0.000034132037,0.000014522015,1.935571e-7,1.9832004e-7,0.0003405695,0.90860134,0.08275473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042285665,0.000025433108,0.00046731328,0.03777933,0.000010484133,0.000007820742,0.00007518535,0.00013714712,6.6306865e-7,0.0019641756,0.9593224,0.00016777807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2875859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55121785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37267745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057503744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401316857","doi":"10.1111/caje.12728","title":"Reproduce to validate: A comprehensive study on the reproducibility of economics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Citation; Computer science; Confidentiality; Reproducibility; Code (set theory); Data science; Statistics; Computer security; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.8716767194993417,"score_gpt":0.47025232220710994,"score_spread":0.4014243972922317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401316857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763916,0.0005001827,0.000016442858,0.017490506,0.0027082178,0.0010640118,0.00027159037,0.00000501341,0.0015524458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762887,0.00009431395,0.00011107933,0.00035989156,0.0006117324,0.000026379803,0.0000018201449,0.00004254151,0.001123381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930004,0.001023667,0.0023764658,0.0022502271,0.00008767111,0.0012616095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774765,0.009545843,0.00062041346,0.004721354,0.0047535906,0.002882339],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.077627495,0.00029384732,0.0009342629,0.038125403,0.000421696,0.0023993351,0.0045121,0.00015798189,0.0004907989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055631146,0.00022531407,0.00039407218,0.022557454,0.00048523577,0.0006014407,0.00033263795,0.0011455165,0.00025529935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006273423,0.0004181036,0.08147111,0.00009507904,0.0009166385,0.00092427194,0.018884752,0.030220196,0.00042774345,0.68211883,0.08094511,0.10295084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008523493,0.00606102,0.063313544,0.00022222532,0.000053701315,0.00039824392,0.021245845,0.004742434,0.0034089305,0.6208475,0.27794492,0.00090924365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075850114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69401217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61816204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028424566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064750155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401413316","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110770","title":"Single-author publications among neurosurgeons in the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Laidlaw Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Ranking (information retrieval); Affect (linguistics); Family medicine; Kingdom; Gerontology; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.8986094510027264,"score_gpt":0.6824477955243516,"score_spread":0.21616165547837474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401413316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96240747,0.00010393801,0.004418732,0.026679337,0.0047933683,0.000131497,0.000006746816,0.000015849831,0.0014430858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971577,0.000092551934,0.00016475489,0.0016332642,0.00023151969,0.0000020379623,2.0558147e-7,0.000007269721,0.0007107304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98515826,0.0015739739,0.0028225477,0.00062528235,0.00931209,0.00050784997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93655324,0.057336967,0.0010728154,0.001184429,0.0030743612,0.000778206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.093274675,0.00011921698,0.00037559628,0.039861843,0.00021851507,0.0069261477,0.0055731228,0.000101913975,0.00009124414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34364167,0.000059542224,0.00042204684,0.24666761,0.000872802,0.001560735,0.00039537137,0.0014703865,0.000046724894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003007174,0.0010650911,0.8218987,0.000005192806,0.0000042995603,0.00057429424,0.0001680886,0.00048811254,0.0017217642,0.009913737,0.08608769,0.07804295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012898815,0.00033456294,0.6705913,0.000017292483,0.0000042977254,0.000098755074,0.000071274226,0.020490704,0.000021952541,0.003152131,0.30502447,0.00006425377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025672025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012030161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.250367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024399655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050248735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401809847","doi":"10.55016/ojs/sppp.v4i1.42365","title":"Investment Review In Canada- We Can do Better","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The School of Public Policy Publications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.660765226777372,"score_gpt":0.5312364057208319,"score_spread":0.12952882105654018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401809847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04799076,0.012591306,0.00021256422,0.6887647,0.0002470353,0.001206394,0.00025682102,0.000034253855,0.24869618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737004,0.0048487703,0.0005412104,0.016601503,0.00010634001,0.00020309127,0.00001036293,0.000015215682,0.003973119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918441,0.0006239131,0.0011703861,0.0004883917,0.005096215,0.0007769566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907458,0.0016456547,0.0006068069,0.0027160929,0.0032168396,0.0010688187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017468292,0.00015105934,0.00034505772,0.02888886,0.00017243397,0.0006562397,0.005405973,0.000052712192,0.0037879015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06786743,0.00008912763,0.00011479286,0.1755294,0.00022950201,0.0007221028,0.00075987785,0.00036489777,0.00022345025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012741474,0.00014489077,0.22448432,0.00002191479,0.00002488702,8.878122e-7,0.00016789116,7.487185e-7,0.000019287627,0.11591939,0.6061627,0.05305175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015261033,0.000018408646,0.6348058,0.00003257837,0.000004970569,0.0000045137767,0.00023846667,0.00004199738,0.000038175996,0.038448904,0.32609594,0.000117677504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66507185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4257895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093538506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012854255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401981553","doi":"10.6087/kcse.345","title":"Our journey as intern junior editors at the &lt;i&gt;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance&lt;/i&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Experimental psychology; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.3165060921893268,"score_gpt":0.5587387415186065,"score_spread":0.24223264932927968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401981553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97093755,0.0013700878,0.00019232427,0.0023261243,0.020085778,0.00011322169,0.0000049509545,0.000018707853,0.004951255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907981,0.00014684837,0.00019636583,0.000116626776,0.0069794827,0.000004083432,5.871421e-7,0.000010586072,0.0017473234],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891594,0.00016703736,0.0008007388,0.0007166286,0.008464122,0.00069205044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964768,0.00072814635,0.0003604572,0.00044494416,0.0015582417,0.00043136833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039464336,0.00016562935,0.00023494233,0.020617776,0.0015173008,0.0043282155,0.0029464727,0.0000904846,0.00054539315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008802706,0.00009345239,0.00013793005,0.04753186,0.0011911598,0.002332742,0.0013126911,0.0004959561,0.00027856688],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018762166,0.00007275796,0.012497269,0.0000074508016,0.000010691835,0.000033423632,0.0032786354,0.000010732598,0.6617929,0.00028428625,0.19498435,0.12700878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018785773,0.004771869,0.39149722,0.00054087036,0.00005000505,0.0025358354,0.041717835,0.03501648,0.0677779,0.003549091,0.44951743,0.00114689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049430755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050330596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59401494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031767623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032159872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402111073","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_10","title":"Conclusion: Inconclusive Thoughts on an Uncertain Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5030762794251062,"score_gpt":0.591099542357933,"score_spread":0.0880232629328268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402111073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006762615,0.021264013,0.000029743156,0.16099696,0.01081159,0.0008722533,0.00079380535,0.00003870381,0.7984303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20238498,0.004349897,0.0002978789,0.0044986918,0.0059113256,0.000033165994,0.00018727912,0.00005767053,0.78227913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910093,0.00035692315,0.0010209011,0.0015042379,0.0075876825,0.00042934853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785403,0.015132326,0.00032525553,0.0008399779,0.0046137087,0.0005484279],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02309045,0.00044898075,0.00063213066,0.02216304,0.00056470186,0.0020880422,0.0017982579,0.0015569401,0.0017451106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018523647,0.0003156076,0.00020368703,0.0085547445,0.00056933245,0.00039769802,0.00093819515,0.008657886,0.00076255406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003918357,0.00010134113,0.00012638926,0.000027522283,0.000024122708,0.000029567893,0.0026812311,0.0000026888658,0.0000064435885,0.92830384,0.029665919,0.03899174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013169939,0.00018240485,0.0009472043,0.00017667707,0.0000060448706,0.000011259947,0.00054011424,0.0001646109,0.0000058393452,0.542498,0.45510083,0.00023529044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001809958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012681204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42543492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049561483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027923207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402115014","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2024.100079","title":"Impact factor does not predict long-term article impact across 15 journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data and Information Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Impact factor; Longevity; Publication; Citation; Metric (unit); Bibliometrics; Library science; Demography; Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.47729475853568815,"score_gpt":0.6017254156890397,"score_spread":0.12443065715335155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402115014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673708,0.0004719455,0.024789875,0.0005834206,0.0004073986,0.00032880413,0.004731426,0.000050020884,0.0012662958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742395,0.00152377,0.00014906886,0.0001351857,0.00006652373,0.000005005094,0.0001806076,0.000004713649,0.00051119074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942912,0.000055642424,0.0006674213,0.0003419878,0.004150936,0.00049280917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976541,0.0004326659,0.0001515672,0.0009679321,0.0004267068,0.00036704078],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008497953,0.00014389309,0.00017426522,0.012167827,0.00024653607,0.016474722,0.001774313,0.000052625157,0.0020149676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012843278,0.000071620714,0.00009179647,0.026459068,0.00006830918,0.01459456,0.002052873,0.00017375784,0.0010028125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024657491,0.000024947867,0.09076848,0.00003700353,0.00008164383,0.0000118006465,0.00028110153,0.000027539372,0.000045898712,0.000086280095,0.031234387,0.87737626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025678735,0.000083540916,0.90265554,0.000021407228,0.000008385088,0.0000073871547,0.00019723504,0.060529795,0.00007304294,0.00017637968,0.035877872,0.00011264374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003202017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043824807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009721552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004788122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402135165","doi":"10.1038/d41586-024-02849-w","title":"How can I publish open access when I can’t afford the fees?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Publication; Computer science; Business; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Computer security; Economics; Advertising; Operating system","score_opus":0.5754697724394935,"score_gpt":0.6136046166867667,"score_spread":0.0381348442472732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402135165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022861,0.021510577,0.0004748541,0.7867256,0.008597296,0.0013373493,0.0005314742,0.00014194375,0.09045234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9152663,0.00016701824,0.00019157495,0.0037929,0.0003796114,0.000031379903,0.000013778476,0.000017791279,0.080139674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913014,0.00020100488,0.00028894588,0.00094748876,0.008769242,0.00066317065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295366,0.0031897028,0.00010378209,0.0012602793,0.002101792,0.00039076328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014957303,0.00017271368,0.00024601966,0.024884637,0.00043744667,0.16028133,0.019583043,0.00073149503,0.0012549392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032234613,0.00008229978,0.00015276526,0.19096163,0.00014968948,0.0038204568,0.006270512,0.002401332,0.00009862688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055579635,0.000016730693,0.004649459,0.0000043642153,0.000016231634,0.00003125017,0.0001358333,0.0000017007336,0.00003116055,0.0064765555,0.8213016,0.16732955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012259469,0.000036388068,0.014413475,0.000011181202,0.0000053560448,0.000010353817,0.00039105501,0.00077768904,0.00031777372,0.045145653,0.93862706,0.00014143865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070024346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016547375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82503766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001727801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078252685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402451286","doi":"10.1109/jsyst.2024.3454938","title":"Editorial","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"IEEE Systems Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.3422342235550952,"score_gpt":0.5552229495675075,"score_spread":0.2129887260124123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402451286","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034148258,0.031207776,0.0010003821,0.0002880605,0.95989555,0.00058235193,0.0010170134,0.00007125116,0.005596121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006764943,0.01535572,0.00003724054,0.000008183915,0.94385874,0.000024877763,0.000018498238,0.00014319312,0.033788603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91553974,0.001985845,0.0042822296,0.002141958,0.07361617,0.0024340274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94513786,0.017981796,0.0024487206,0.0018110905,0.029651167,0.0029693556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10358241,0.001083946,0.0021575477,0.16068576,0.0014188124,0.096366435,0.010221957,0.0035799884,0.0005535074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08683387,0.0007197842,0.0016581322,0.20735076,0.00043149703,0.0017425474,0.0011261975,0.0103290975,0.020816097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000847313,0.00012133847,0.00008883064,0.00027101365,0.00030843003,0.0008131915,0.00016254636,0.00045098722,0.00013919141,0.00005284959,0.9906164,0.0068905195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092633505,0.0006331549,0.000011535016,0.0017253845,0.00011666239,0.0005572792,0.00020273076,0.001395222,0.000016758902,0.0013174093,0.9922883,0.0008092499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032795354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054623765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094623886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018732953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072373566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402453161","doi":"10.29173/cais1841","title":"The Use of Institutional Repositories for Self-Archiving in Canadian Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.2466887847518986,"score_gpt":0.4171787706029342,"score_spread":0.17048998585103559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402453161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99282795,0.00037273738,0.000056025863,0.002341568,0.00039828575,0.00027602667,0.0003186916,0.00001127662,0.0033974573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812126,0.00015643044,0.0005758444,0.000023476838,0.00004584528,0.000009561444,0.0000011899672,0.0000065439963,0.001059857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663216,0.000034296863,0.0005807215,0.00031105272,0.0019764074,0.00046538847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921333,0.0066677593,0.0005694363,0.00035013567,0.099945776,0.00033359142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053847022,0.00012556356,0.0002740327,0.007602784,0.0003207201,0.010306528,0.0027873262,0.00008848413,0.0000073319366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105410434,0.00007446857,0.0001640155,0.018765045,0.0006476724,0.008006763,0.00062862394,0.00021498399,9.908011e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015752463,0.000096825075,0.60176605,0.0003042038,0.00013305462,0.000006153162,0.030901674,0.00007846055,0.0039062395,0.3167245,0.0149655,0.030959778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002802477,0.00024175254,0.29939452,0.0002963115,0.000029561672,0.000019299292,0.0070759845,0.011954581,0.008145151,0.014247422,0.65810496,0.00021024152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021542141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051620533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6431394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023283367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027723436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99072087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402453776","doi":"10.29173/cais1845","title":"The Value of a Diamond: Understanding Global Coverage of Diamond Open Access Journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenAlex to Support an Open Future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; Diamond; World Wide Web; Value (mathematics); Data science; Computer science; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Political science; MEDLINE; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.38672522013639615,"score_gpt":0.532216438191279,"score_spread":0.1454912180548828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402453776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98143923,0.0007314957,0.000056844878,0.0021290607,0.00027346527,0.000983793,0.0005943746,0.00000441961,0.0137872975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833965,0.001069458,0.0002554855,0.00006802977,0.00003401564,0.000015617783,9.114806e-7,0.0000118300195,0.00020497716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921133,0.000109366636,0.0014701446,0.0007285361,0.0049481033,0.00063056574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395759,0.0018034328,0.0016166293,0.0006273871,0.055849787,0.00052685576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028114181,0.00024020701,0.0008777604,0.00882441,0.00029653354,0.04096553,0.021506215,0.00013023171,0.000071391805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07402016,0.00013858765,0.00012851993,0.064736746,0.0018343312,0.029338408,0.013298172,0.0003293181,9.3971795e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053601566,0.0003173236,0.81895083,0.000264119,0.00008987981,0.0000053902436,0.010672627,0.000030006157,0.030367548,0.08789299,0.005886741,0.044986516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015175601,0.0020903929,0.7888514,0.0012977542,0.00006683507,0.00004427093,0.025340095,0.0029425104,0.04642344,0.11725637,0.01367352,0.0004958453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000867165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002123502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05591234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019070804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029877294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402565036","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103882","title":"Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gray (unit); Science policy; Management science; Political science; Regional science; Environmental science; Sociology; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.4141796441951298,"score_gpt":0.6053734205310228,"score_spread":0.19119377633589302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402565036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95592713,0.019983688,0.0015165842,0.0064500812,0.00039254027,0.0047326186,0.0009184315,0.000041456908,0.010037483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920831,0.0025498485,0.003008871,0.00022028116,0.00044175956,0.00032056423,0.0000046517894,0.000017582388,0.0013533396],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878719,0.00009368355,0.00083264156,0.0017661197,0.0078669805,0.0015686841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370515,0.0038099634,0.00018987147,0.0007548925,0.0006301839,0.00090991665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057914816,0.00024345309,0.00043620117,0.06025768,0.0017702029,0.004229825,0.0032449337,0.00021042708,0.000051902294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051094774,0.00015689907,0.00013342178,0.23998784,0.0076168687,0.0019600424,0.0016180293,0.0006176255,0.0000455533],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006241155,0.00023575887,0.0012697526,0.00046588748,0.000008980853,0.000027648568,0.0060385996,0.000012528109,0.24311319,0.10283484,0.008492419,0.637438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014792489,0.0016492805,0.007157001,0.0002633215,0.000027458616,0.00081991625,0.0045738597,0.0043265764,0.16643985,0.28044954,0.5317738,0.0010401325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008690638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000929483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63639784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069285603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025077872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402586478","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00331","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Diamond; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.9189744428884732,"score_gpt":0.7656385779657428,"score_spread":0.15333586492273044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402586478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871336,0.16868083,0.0019142412,0.12699202,0.006645194,0.0022497298,0.00008343255,0.00007982854,0.0062210974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96483797,0.026799897,0.00495183,0.0005953719,0.00007669734,0.00018127606,2.5655945e-7,0.00002286071,0.0025338659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728298,0.000980771,0.001833663,0.003001377,0.019297598,0.002056777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154617,0.055142026,0.0008872113,0.0023495122,0.025016446,0.0011430795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1548605,0.0004957814,0.0011454463,0.082582064,0.004473627,0.043112792,0.024835637,0.00007146933,0.00012777388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31057465,0.0002581522,0.0002137391,0.48804572,0.014732712,0.017326832,0.021830492,0.0009477455,0.00096782384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021392356,0.00036165654,0.030001685,0.00015090656,0.0004478183,0.00033960212,0.32197854,0.0010340663,0.033780012,0.3706901,0.11877581,0.122225866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046314765,0.0009788526,0.115542956,0.0011228252,0.00003343364,0.000014542138,0.47093597,0.0061140633,0.0069687194,0.3837505,0.013238067,0.0008369148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027917125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069468294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40546367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010342991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021678342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402606259","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2403731","title":"Forty-five years of disability and rehabilitation research: review of the journal Disability and Rehabilitation through bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Psychology; Bibliometrics; Gerontology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.4809516480874636,"score_gpt":0.5957036027198622,"score_spread":0.11475195463239862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402606259","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16269033,0.8270524,0.00006190411,0.0047906744,0.00050898606,0.004121547,0.0006317021,0.00002653502,0.00011591935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079845145,0.91706145,0.0026168623,0.000023657774,0.00010055654,0.00019403883,0.00004886176,0.00004857587,0.00006085526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651976,0.013991223,0.0062763193,0.0027744586,0.010781316,0.0009790366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7679042,0.21629483,0.0028309005,0.00437219,0.007827371,0.0007704833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12739396,0.0007675085,0.0041120006,0.067545824,0.00067661103,0.0009844283,0.002043684,0.00078328757,0.00014000718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35265666,0.00047319225,0.002422601,0.54497594,0.025624337,0.0017516093,0.002116479,0.0019776253,0.000011017558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079900776,0.001041676,0.1990835,0.08892763,0.00037312505,4.7466065e-7,0.0025283403,0.000005541656,0.0000014051826,0.0010237301,0.0025487228,0.70438594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051609916,0.002116615,0.823631,0.015230358,0.00321466,0.00001697726,0.005004329,0.00018888188,6.6276846e-7,0.061817277,0.087586306,0.0006768523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001002629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003398112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7037091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011717424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058245735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402878363","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620","title":"Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tzu Chi College of Technology; Tzu Chi University","keywords":"Web of science; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; MEDLINE; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.3699171100309078,"score_gpt":0.5316296822327008,"score_spread":0.16171257220179297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402878363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668082,0.028697183,0.0017613408,0.00047510897,0.0013720492,0.00026665322,0.00019467667,0.000022151842,0.00040261494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997238,0.0006360445,0.0012423153,0.000062337735,0.00005715413,0.0000071315803,0.0000045165775,0.000008750993,0.00074378116],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832885,0.00031478333,0.00092660356,0.0013112507,0.013400916,0.0007579365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98870337,0.0033618885,0.0001594203,0.0014239245,0.0059348894,0.00041653693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04405121,0.00015472707,0.00036757777,0.85833466,0.00042183144,0.012716362,0.0032331375,0.00011676925,0.00080048916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057029687,0.000090533315,0.00018265865,0.99393094,0.00086397486,0.0012846689,0.00090225815,0.00050385814,0.00018276116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004592428,0.00027154371,0.32701877,0.000047010475,0.00009718575,0.00009665251,0.0022311993,0.0012517171,0.50498426,0.00072152156,0.0046653696,0.15856881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001762917,0.0000805272,0.73137546,0.00017922773,0.000054916367,0.000003874308,0.0006420706,0.22278307,0.029041631,0.0011954224,0.014229294,0.00023821052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020153249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018326932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47594264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021917043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011817069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98830855},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4402984919","doi":"10.30654/mjcr.10149","title":"A Case Report for Quality Assurance: Understanding the NSQIP Database and Preventing Error in Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathews Journal of Case Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Medicine; Database; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.7771070929117748,"score_gpt":0.6368671075224521,"score_spread":0.1402399853893227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402984919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75821555,0.103922606,0.11996625,0.012548551,0.0022632077,0.0013189792,0.000069888745,0.000018633511,0.0016763409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948393,0.0012839076,0.001825514,0.00009294806,0.0001294581,0.000012780926,0.0000025001361,0.000014291432,0.0017992954],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899593,0.000437705,0.0028009992,0.0004982657,0.005937575,0.00036614505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473626,0.009429574,0.0016974296,0.0007959532,0.0030565767,0.00028421282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20783482,0.00014151612,0.00052305975,0.008665458,0.0002863415,0.001789968,0.00026983168,0.000059095386,0.00008188273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1399147,0.00007455813,0.00029446365,0.025705807,0.000111386384,0.0008060487,0.00025054096,0.00044034692,0.0000017177924],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011058043,0.00004311634,0.002064995,0.0004241324,0.00003117173,0.96584624,0.00024097071,0.000007738343,0.000062581275,0.0003139962,0.020584868,0.010369108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013136143,0.00005060798,0.00019075739,0.00074803055,0.000045439952,0.9363112,0.0011665664,0.0008785016,0.000018934257,0.013851422,0.046507135,0.000100074634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061254614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008705899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23662376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017956144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048769082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403010732","doi":"10.7202/1113756ar","title":"Les revues canadiennes en sciences sociales et humaines : entre diffusion nationale et internationalisation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociographiques","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Political science; Humanities; Art; Business","score_opus":0.7457423671960298,"score_gpt":0.614565238017552,"score_spread":0.1311771291784778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403010732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203312,0.10566217,0.004883363,0.13265173,0.0032231295,0.0005517797,0.00046741904,0.00028917572,0.031940054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167518,0.050126232,0.007469615,0.0005652872,0.0006297779,0.000046707446,0.00008893109,0.000041144296,0.02428049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662174,0.005379371,0.00091082184,0.0012497434,0.005028177,0.0008101511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610202,0.035643324,0.00025990975,0.00030992928,0.0024302914,0.0003363938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058899358,0.00039446,0.00042838496,0.037918244,0.0008470144,0.0058192746,0.0018236374,0.0006812459,0.0010297161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030532416,0.00032787226,0.0006092682,0.07367537,0.0021176722,0.0022355057,0.0005967862,0.0010162564,0.00011422834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009330817,0.00024105438,0.11714307,0.00016702154,0.00015905824,0.00002526324,0.021111116,0.000026814543,0.00075871724,0.6137918,0.020817827,0.2257489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021946033,0.00025907368,0.13999921,0.0007865869,0.00005612423,0.000026246846,0.0064030946,0.007665581,0.0005260467,0.6999985,0.14341748,0.0006425677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10349738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06374267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22510633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003972976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023837842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403013382","doi":"10.1016/j.jtumed.2024.09.009","title":"Orthopedic research productivity of KSA: First bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; King Saud University","keywords":"Productivity; Orthopedic surgery; Medicine; Surgery; Economics","score_opus":0.7085184768933618,"score_gpt":0.6118808293536963,"score_spread":0.09663764753966553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403013382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716052,0.0039594527,0.005708307,0.01144601,0.00094523875,0.000106146814,0.000014829869,0.000011783833,0.0062030344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516624,0.002190862,0.0005612993,0.000011278043,0.00020847844,1.0489372e-7,2.8020597e-7,0.0000033326758,0.0018581252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95871186,0.0010055718,0.0009555261,0.0006781842,0.03797089,0.000677974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662472,0.022659117,0.0006700801,0.0006166485,0.008272211,0.0015347254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16237631,0.00012455024,0.00062049786,0.7532117,0.00064792787,0.0011891111,0.0058548725,0.00017571758,0.0026450618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113856986,0.00007621868,0.0005908801,0.94676805,0.0026594575,0.0018842507,0.0012166324,0.0010196427,0.00006482538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032344,0.00065788766,0.62832856,0.00007321756,0.0004908441,0.0009412624,0.00042971232,0.000466382,0.0001758209,0.005492912,0.04946505,0.31339803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244764,0.0024412388,0.59390295,0.00022127376,0.00023460534,0.00015379234,0.004221419,0.022247262,0.0004846882,0.0066202627,0.36839578,0.00035227076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002860041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001380434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31893072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024560755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026878545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984777},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4403035225","doi":"10.1515/9780776638775-005","title":"ADDENDUM. About the Centre on Governance of the University of Ottawa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Addendum; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Geography; Management; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.22969127437313724,"score_gpt":0.3605927596755298,"score_spread":0.13090148530239254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403035225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012353241,0.00064374757,0.000044914745,0.00032399257,0.00037481432,0.00044978477,0.001652463,0.000010782634,0.9952642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13964021,0.0005963053,0.00007655577,0.000027510841,0.000028438179,4.2075555e-8,0.0000047289523,0.000016133023,0.8596101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124426,0.0002799812,0.00045522331,0.000658315,0.0070285564,0.00033364168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919859,0.0025719318,0.0017234453,0.0017707276,0.0017946889,0.00015330344],"candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00328274,0.00024567128,0.00058507285,0.0038875097,0.00054726086,0.000061781786,0.007418271,0.00023949813,0.0037002782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013202586,0.00017662412,0.000590017,0.0031398379,0.0013581458,0.00012634353,0.0028791765,0.0007118045,0.00002517105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014077233,0.00011098767,0.0014902591,0.000079995516,0.00021027352,0.000055808734,0.0013793415,0.0002050126,0.000047048285,0.7451136,0.22458288,0.026584039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004934279,0.00010795109,0.0046973433,0.00008831497,0.00006086758,0.0000013009893,0.00042267673,0.00007144933,0.0002944622,0.0010479674,0.99254304,0.00017120081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011036951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76796013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019677918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047449447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403120212","doi":"10.25080/nkvc9349","title":"Continuous Tools for Scientific Publishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Innovates; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Publishing; Scientific publishing; Political science","score_opus":0.5985646921998998,"score_gpt":0.5403248105297374,"score_spread":0.058239881670162474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403120212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95938224,0.0006682796,0.00054831436,0.005859457,0.003561815,0.00065800035,0.00004283013,0.000044316923,0.029234739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968843,0.000023124405,0.0012129785,0.000039879935,0.0000756743,0.000046638277,4.259425e-7,0.0000061432393,0.0017108467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874309,0.000023105178,0.0009970164,0.0012701623,0.0094229765,0.0008558515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729596,0.009203928,0.0006744374,0.00073065714,0.015978824,0.00045257845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07567436,0.00015465115,0.00033348618,0.03125981,0.0006699399,0.073861726,0.009516142,0.00009285972,0.00009337363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18802191,0.000083986495,0.00018885483,0.20063831,0.0028855624,0.010619545,0.0014946584,0.00033756593,0.000021931977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022670622,0.000088083296,0.13474694,0.00008758603,0.000006980602,8.928404e-7,0.002174022,0.000013042915,0.060720555,0.32224068,0.01669471,0.46320382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055860763,0.00028068246,0.104762085,0.00053539156,0.000015236941,0.000018561997,0.014503649,0.06365052,0.11847948,0.5398842,0.15674601,0.0005655223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006453407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023958082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46263832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012817176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017067905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403187083","doi":"10.7759/cureus.71001","title":"A Century of Mathematical Epidemiology: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cureus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Visualization; Epidemiology; Bibliometrics; Data science; Library science; Data mining; Pathology","score_opus":0.8547371498408696,"score_gpt":0.7288303240598216,"score_spread":0.12590682578104795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403187083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000098659555,0.9939383,0.0024372488,0.000034568744,0.00020538631,0.00029920673,0.0002241812,0.000015805252,0.0027466097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075784774,0.9969106,0.00085981045,0.000002980819,0.00006477018,0.000032175452,0.000043295226,0.000026595111,0.0013019475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818671,0.0029317536,0.0034978993,0.0013851809,0.0095189875,0.00079910393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94858867,0.043802127,0.0011957261,0.0015548273,0.0043730177,0.0004856251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10176125,0.0003242755,0.004058829,0.9227555,0.00009440997,0.00049676705,0.0026788951,0.0006409004,0.0010782575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17164032,0.00018451524,0.001335097,0.9791619,0.00080194615,0.00022055287,0.0019314224,0.00066081394,0.00014120695],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027559513,0.00015861136,0.0013323318,0.0038076402,0.000672342,0.000006177494,0.000045696594,3.5319786e-7,3.9156163e-7,0.008527591,0.0050884522,0.98035765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117214804,0.00035129217,0.0022879564,0.0017911282,0.0027639263,0.00001817854,0.00010657563,0.0014464299,0.0000020546406,0.01778092,0.9730282,0.00030611965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008531905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007903714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015347429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040267254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998349},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4403197130","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.08.005","title":"Why Early Career Researchers Should Engage in the Peer Review Process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Psychology; Peer review; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6364947067037929,"score_gpt":0.6325054537421799,"score_spread":0.00398925296161301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403197130","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031486727,0.1701545,0.000016509202,0.07109168,0.72414523,0.0018393665,0.0002782649,0.000011184487,0.0009765227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032180864,0.14701721,0.0005128474,0.0033211824,0.79713935,0.0011184098,0.00023245114,0.00009928515,0.018378418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736821,0.00093658065,0.0013318011,0.00045141322,0.023249673,0.0003484306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690119,0.005312127,0.000699223,0.00046786582,0.024152175,0.00035673197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057801772,0.00020140954,0.00051523803,0.027837235,0.00015820138,0.0035623813,0.0021975427,0.00043430994,0.00032766204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07992659,0.00011344969,0.00026319572,0.048635066,0.00013782266,0.00074716576,0.00012590562,0.0032782035,0.000041511794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009095847,0.0018997223,0.00045657504,0.0004376951,0.000005690168,0.00003301004,0.00041493468,3.7529684e-8,0.0000067652736,0.00000662034,0.96850425,0.028225616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002886132,0.0002527117,0.004675085,0.0015683937,0.0000995012,0.00004541783,0.0032568,0.0000012253726,0.0000057384086,0.0008993944,0.9887757,0.00013144642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007716207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020661813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07299408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000244729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018719201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403258249","doi":"10.1177/21582440241286217","title":"Research Output, Key Topics, and Trends in Productivity, Visibility, and Collaboration in Social Sciences Research on COVID-19: A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Visibility; Productivity; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Visualization; Data science; Key (lock); Regional science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth; Biology; Medicine; Virology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.791546586054148,"score_gpt":0.7291634070649856,"score_spread":0.06238317898916235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403258249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771258,0.0020261128,0.0002574512,0.013164613,0.000118066426,0.00083768077,0.000040448533,0.000013365102,0.0064164465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562705,0.00037227775,0.00016001906,0.00006102857,0.00007406418,0.000047454105,0.000007096333,0.000007610881,0.0036434212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452747,0.0029281431,0.0006227181,0.0020899903,0.009039807,0.00079185923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119663,0.006513589,0.00007541089,0.0004475643,0.0013743391,0.00039244976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18261047,0.00014045564,0.00040500742,0.316676,0.0012200602,0.01939165,0.0015243824,0.0001456938,0.00014309424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0484876,0.000107053485,0.000035594636,0.7127522,0.001470709,0.0018580314,0.0032425201,0.00056166673,0.000012171828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081995444,0.00025356357,0.5628499,0.000041652456,0.000018808367,0.000039073413,0.0036335117,0.000056477027,0.00010997979,0.0133857615,0.003567338,0.41596198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005794233,0.0005209752,0.93237895,0.00002804311,0.000008163898,0.0000024253002,0.004283262,0.022404678,0.00009778956,0.028956058,0.0105521055,0.00018813879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002820311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090321945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41577384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005416667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080084905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98162633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403559446","doi":"10.1016/j.micron.2024.103727","title":"Bring your paper into the ‘Fast Lane’ of the editorial process and increase your changes for final acceptance in Micron, The International Research and Review Journal for Microscopy – Part II","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Micron","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Process (computing); Nanotechnology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.6426817538981707,"score_gpt":0.6425610705351855,"score_spread":0.00012068336298520776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403559446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001940869,0.980951,0.000012813876,0.0056383023,0.008981208,0.0021300602,0.00029473825,0.0000031108923,0.00004787764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000072464085,0.99037534,0.0001211216,0.00013323186,0.006981033,0.00024904747,0.000011604192,0.000027432998,0.0020286983],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936909,0.0004800344,0.0010337111,0.0007478501,0.0034715324,0.0005759595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917669,0.0043047033,0.0005782393,0.0005884234,0.0026285946,0.0001330822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04093094,0.00028094143,0.00083007634,0.0058342703,0.00079615304,0.0022683865,0.0038809932,0.00020814488,0.000043377604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017327735,0.000113853355,0.00028044765,0.020913595,0.0004874808,0.00023006157,0.0019135366,0.0012140898,0.000006111239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004967467,0.00006277518,0.000097407945,0.0044442117,0.000053873857,0.0000016126913,0.0004741038,7.593133e-8,0.000157868,0.00003882644,0.33497658,0.659643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028143852,0.0001521804,0.00004159896,0.0074333674,0.000085838205,0.00005484797,0.00029210787,0.000010076318,0.0000591447,0.0011849623,0.99027324,0.00013118134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105789324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028199865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6595118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020158278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008385607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403560549","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2024.2412269","title":"Accessible scientific conferences for blind and low vision professionals and researchers: a necessary step for achieving STEMM equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CNIB Foundation; Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Psychology; Low vision; Public relations; Political science; Optometry; Medicine","score_opus":0.7045875343204858,"score_gpt":0.6564878198879283,"score_spread":0.04809971443255756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403560549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758969,0.0058107967,0.008392662,0.0063579115,0.0007059336,0.0020660658,0.0004608103,0.0000541506,0.00025475817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994529,0.00021856897,0.0033936978,0.00008391058,0.00012367731,0.00022279263,0.000033560864,0.000016012766,0.0013787628],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141407,0.0003349694,0.00076259585,0.0017839964,0.0048542465,0.00085012976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974698,0.021638045,0.00014437993,0.000717073,0.0022495494,0.0005529492],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06223941,0.00021773935,0.00043006495,0.0024376446,0.001474092,0.014758978,0.0014244287,0.00023441328,0.00012974809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02120678,0.0001401406,0.00034794392,0.031297576,0.0020140274,0.0018959632,0.0021520315,0.00037870242,0.00000921373],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002676065,0.0008838548,0.13923362,0.0021196154,0.00009308799,0.0000010002913,0.0035407112,0.0000041408944,0.003697402,0.0038928308,0.078127876,0.76813823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039868224,0.0014260593,0.25966144,0.0008521605,0.00007904098,0.000005370892,0.048369408,0.45135465,0.0019656448,0.15102229,0.0801394,0.0011377194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051281026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007154581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76700056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014166703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082519674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404058795","doi":"10.38126/jspg250107","title":"Policy Considerations for Canada’s Open Access Publishing Strategy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.6892903297914962,"score_gpt":0.6472148725152396,"score_spread":0.04207545727625661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404058795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24286371,0.004473613,0.013321266,0.6409381,0.007416542,0.0013805496,0.0013631288,0.000035658286,0.088207394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916924,0.0002967703,0.0014208433,0.002186486,0.0010966418,0.0000065692225,2.7269368e-7,0.000010946945,0.0032890635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98555684,0.000088231136,0.0012281014,0.00062355754,0.011579991,0.00092327007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97404325,0.009620869,0.0018887097,0.00089080835,0.01213573,0.0014206043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03051239,0.0001597378,0.00038548646,0.026237518,0.0008862446,0.10141225,0.01397704,0.000062483974,0.00017522904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3027884,0.00010678665,0.00015531265,0.16375712,0.0007559592,0.027246442,0.0023633076,0.00047258288,0.000010234002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017470196,0.000048916954,0.001491545,0.000011811949,0.00001790706,0.00006737476,0.0002899202,0.0009645644,0.0014859405,0.35203522,0.5086956,0.13487375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074339326,0.000298399,0.12019244,0.00013060626,0.000010991055,0.00041596478,0.00063477276,0.011815199,0.0036273485,0.52579707,0.33594272,0.00039108595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40112427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12374501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7488287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018901393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09158429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404094290","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5010875","title":"Analyst-Peer Alumni Tie","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.40147556133462664,"score_gpt":0.5669979265405267,"score_spread":0.16552236520590008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404094290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49889076,0.28921607,0.058443192,0.049472682,0.021503095,0.0012950188,0.00032727764,0.00030682574,0.08054508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87766254,0.018101228,0.00023753378,0.00012400877,0.0014936257,0.000012884959,0.000017600123,0.000060021866,0.10229054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675781,0.0005711093,0.0016314596,0.0015738219,0.022967583,0.0056778966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987608,0.0015971905,0.00074646436,0.0015596471,0.007779321,0.0007093537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12651595,0.00047873563,0.00083421706,0.104630165,0.0004121348,0.012451681,0.0073889038,0.00059712015,0.00074915896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028334988,0.00031639068,0.0011712001,0.13363472,0.0001701989,0.00031415888,0.0058999965,0.017082827,0.003546259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059188802,0.00022316417,0.007108103,0.000038566748,0.0011353972,0.0002518985,0.0002475219,0.0006698802,0.00008566515,0.096409045,0.13835402,0.7554175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022100052,0.00018736754,0.0006266608,0.00005379566,0.00006885867,0.00039189646,0.00071355136,0.0041165017,0.000034025372,0.93991655,0.053300254,0.00036955517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021583814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053872727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84350747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032725066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015362976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404182729","doi":"10.32920/27637548","title":"Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9441010751848984,"score_gpt":0.7807323306056492,"score_spread":0.16336874457924921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404182729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831236,0.0053048,0.0030229734,0.0033817391,0.00081948034,0.00018636113,0.000011349675,0.000003514329,0.0041462034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8051937,0.0006755435,0.19371067,0.00006933306,0.000016097054,0.0000050789413,4.707312e-7,0.000007664401,0.000321448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991575,0.0014681758,0.0031871025,0.00087310624,0.0023017915,0.00059484685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593777,0.027005147,0.0086638415,0.00092822546,0.0031102933,0.00091477775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13892117,0.00012947009,0.00056427385,0.14360891,0.000057129495,0.0040520197,0.00089938747,0.0002516248,0.0002521135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.60835713,0.000087600674,0.000090076144,0.09716489,0.00022926244,0.00041346415,0.0011196508,0.0015391475,0.000012400434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012094007,0.000033922497,0.81652725,0.000020572636,0.000015938209,0.00038658117,0.0010547022,0.00013015045,0.00048145917,0.001483965,0.0012651391,0.17858821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278645,0.00008268515,0.7162463,0.000092340044,0.000006200011,0.000092615664,0.0016892796,0.025723992,0.00031391505,0.25137997,0.0040958854,0.00014893067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25354907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38031924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46943593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011803346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021066184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404182756","doi":"10.32920/27637548.v1","title":"Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Applied psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9441010751848984,"score_gpt":0.7807323306056492,"score_spread":0.16336874457924921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404182756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831236,0.0053048,0.0030229734,0.0033817391,0.00081948034,0.00018636113,0.000011349675,0.000003514329,0.0041462034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8051937,0.0006755435,0.19371067,0.00006933306,0.000016097054,0.0000050789413,4.707312e-7,0.000007664401,0.000321448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991575,0.0014681758,0.0031871025,0.00087310624,0.0023017915,0.00059484685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593777,0.027005147,0.0086638415,0.00092822546,0.0031102933,0.00091477775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13892117,0.00012947009,0.00056427385,0.14360891,0.000057129495,0.0040520197,0.00089938747,0.0002516248,0.0002521135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.60835713,0.000087600674,0.000090076144,0.09716489,0.00022926244,0.00041346415,0.0011196508,0.0015391475,0.000012400434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012094007,0.000033922497,0.81652725,0.000020572636,0.000015938209,0.00038658117,0.0010547022,0.00013015045,0.00048145917,0.001483965,0.0012651391,0.17858821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001278645,0.00008268515,0.7162463,0.000092340044,0.000006200011,0.000092615664,0.0016892796,0.025723992,0.00031391505,0.25137997,0.0040958854,0.00014893067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25354907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38031924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46943593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011803346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021066184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404567963","doi":"10.1177/08902070241301629","title":"Examining personality psychology to unpack the peer review system: Towards a more diverse, inclusive, and equitable psychological science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Personality","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychological science; Personality; Social psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.6844091618747419,"score_gpt":0.61849815946169,"score_spread":0.06591100241305192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404567963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8011027,0.02716044,0.0054426314,0.083946146,0.0022393118,0.0004329895,0.00008719578,0.000042190677,0.07954641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99242586,0.00093309116,0.001323039,0.003354321,0.00038978236,0.0000017506013,6.372461e-7,0.000014081441,0.0015574417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98054105,0.002249839,0.0012698901,0.0010592928,0.014066372,0.00081355014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897952,0.0015757199,0.00040372487,0.0007608568,0.0066024414,0.0008620254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20238526,0.00022181452,0.00053292804,0.0074884132,0.0007814033,0.0027670555,0.004068759,0.000041942338,0.0005220639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045938402,0.000112558446,0.00024220662,0.05940116,0.0011822609,0.000789976,0.002169967,0.0008450094,0.00026238256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016260736,0.00024881418,0.020872453,0.00046351016,0.00010710395,0.0020258399,0.006474726,0.000010249082,0.0018609702,0.0034997286,0.50884646,0.45542753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046176475,0.0008950634,0.68384105,0.0008555135,0.00006372295,0.0017256228,0.0053794053,0.00041844245,0.000017021328,0.00038252582,0.30566004,0.00029981454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031495674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025971583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66296864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026008845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003734657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404709284","doi":"10.2004/wjst.v10i4.852","title":"Editorial Preface","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.8027883020527181,"score_gpt":0.7343855149477503,"score_spread":0.06840278710496783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404709284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8637202,0.012985276,0.0013764934,0.0009624072,0.0788621,0.0013525065,0.00007825931,0.000052243566,0.040610503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723051,0.006304375,0.00054866687,0.00024970633,0.014798405,0.00007287038,0.000004293579,0.00004613105,0.005670414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98079634,0.00062279665,0.0017176743,0.0009754088,0.014988341,0.00089941313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98360866,0.0055078967,0.0012507103,0.0013408691,0.007210905,0.0010809785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02403223,0.0003172294,0.00090780575,0.048145782,0.00047949346,0.028749837,0.017613795,0.00023543253,0.07845091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03778666,0.00021966199,0.0003375485,0.11823105,0.000282518,0.009151348,0.0054095886,0.00073991984,0.0014459683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003076088,0.00015454905,0.2309164,0.0000051621273,0.000031683387,0.0000040245272,0.000032638167,0.00003333246,0.01808983,0.000047688965,0.6957413,0.05491262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047286594,0.000020386686,0.576153,0.00003722729,0.000010817696,0.00000386398,0.000090354544,0.00030825628,0.0066838437,0.038259897,0.37763003,0.0003294542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020897556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019131261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3452366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015573917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043497753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404734563","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110370","title":"Impact factors and publication times of original scientific research in radiology journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Imaging","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Vancouver General Hospital; University of British Columbia; BC Cancer Agency; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical physics; Impact factor; Radiology","score_opus":0.8628176660417445,"score_gpt":0.7496248331863482,"score_spread":0.11319283285539627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404734563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852819,0.0075817364,0.0004230615,0.003410864,0.0008566066,0.00012814703,0.000016076596,0.000012914533,0.0022887147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998414,0.00040421597,0.00025567992,0.0000150332635,0.00009527595,0.0000022071408,0.000003123137,0.000006565339,0.00080393755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185777,0.0011108597,0.0013268426,0.00085853453,0.004251614,0.0005944106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639819,0.031159153,0.00017440459,0.0006168912,0.0035903042,0.00047730963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13161488,0.00009099588,0.00035398983,0.06911664,0.0001759575,0.005726402,0.0012340522,0.0000852119,0.00095642667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0931071,0.00005308019,0.00016462983,0.1373046,0.001375689,0.0010794571,0.0005403056,0.0008339015,0.00016870562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067585347,0.000054389006,0.7809413,0.000004177381,0.0000059644894,0.00001206508,0.000058135152,0.0000014901226,0.0002945095,0.0007073972,0.019492956,0.19842084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001866227,0.00009538204,0.9266967,0.00004139663,0.0000023532525,0.000019756346,0.00019064953,0.02029931,0.00010236445,0.028482825,0.023806587,0.0000760183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076944394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038691314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19834481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009392731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059011125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905567","doi":"10.32920/27940890.v1","title":"Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Information retrieval; Operating system","score_opus":0.9025638254961048,"score_gpt":0.6849236624817889,"score_spread":0.21764016301431588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300077,0.005909509,0.0038734677,0.007415183,0.0027962888,0.0015436502,0.00018923279,0.00007080386,0.048194177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672466,0.00019475259,0.009612361,0.00020355475,0.00042165825,0.00004235542,0.0000033153567,0.000048735892,0.02222666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95058846,0.0022335837,0.0019741892,0.0025582188,0.041124795,0.0015207471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640794,0.011102684,0.0003148505,0.004223121,0.019359922,0.00092005654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21355075,0.0003539001,0.00076347345,0.16067022,0.00079382927,0.033646576,0.013575235,0.0006235628,0.0010818058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16511072,0.0001890878,0.00057069375,0.3500021,0.0005593324,0.00093879557,0.029978463,0.0077356813,0.0037106818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018676909,0.0009506322,0.025927572,0.00048289003,0.0003925994,0.0002068549,0.004190054,0.0045802966,0.013057405,0.050208516,0.40872267,0.49109372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046264232,0.00056780706,0.035377398,0.0005628133,0.000057152545,0.000031482046,0.007175395,0.04024965,0.009352315,0.6663697,0.23874234,0.0010513344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012840384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005900373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61616117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004855162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018273437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404905576","doi":"10.32920/27940890","title":"Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Track (disk drive); Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Operating system","score_opus":0.9025638254961048,"score_gpt":0.6849236624817889,"score_spread":0.21764016301431588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300077,0.005909509,0.0038734677,0.007415183,0.0027962888,0.0015436502,0.00018923279,0.00007080386,0.048194177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672466,0.00019475259,0.009612361,0.00020355475,0.00042165825,0.00004235542,0.0000033153567,0.000048735892,0.02222666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95058846,0.0022335837,0.0019741892,0.0025582188,0.041124795,0.0015207471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640794,0.011102684,0.0003148505,0.004223121,0.019359922,0.00092005654],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21355075,0.0003539001,0.00076347345,0.16067022,0.00079382927,0.033646576,0.013575235,0.0006235628,0.0010818058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16511072,0.0001890878,0.00057069375,0.3500021,0.0005593324,0.00093879557,0.029978463,0.0077356813,0.0037106818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018676909,0.0009506322,0.025927572,0.00048289003,0.0003925994,0.0002068549,0.004190054,0.0045802966,0.013057405,0.050208516,0.40872267,0.49109372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046264232,0.00056780706,0.035377398,0.0005628133,0.000057152545,0.000031482046,0.007175395,0.04024965,0.009352315,0.6663697,0.23874234,0.0010513344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012840384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005900373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61616117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004855162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018273437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905603","doi":"10.32920/27934593.v1","title":"Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Key (lock); Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Library science; Chemistry; Biology; Computer security","score_opus":0.6378472806550276,"score_gpt":0.6182650425351772,"score_spread":0.01958223811985038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028102803,0.29770395,0.0001862737,0.080586545,0.0055426667,0.0013549814,0.00024340207,0.00022291573,0.611349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014990797,0.22358577,0.0016433385,0.004086675,0.00051362085,0.00013706551,0.000053665204,0.00006194722,0.7549271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95952284,0.00037999463,0.0019476991,0.002447931,0.03469255,0.0010090041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98292434,0.002874528,0.00049534295,0.002742473,0.010062751,0.00090054027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06842772,0.00050652557,0.0011099413,0.059669524,0.0001693909,0.0047573084,0.008013455,0.0008890954,0.018272165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116562955,0.00030255632,0.00078396226,0.18736705,0.00028278684,0.0003252535,0.015369183,0.004257931,0.014865466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047034005,0.000020433396,0.0009256643,0.00056610676,0.000047693877,0.000026610038,0.00007267354,0.000007632672,0.00006604951,0.0032431765,0.87587667,0.11914262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006667789,0.00003670178,0.0024039873,0.0010707151,0.000043378543,0.000015485835,0.00008711114,0.00021010036,0.00012242906,0.04011036,0.9554052,0.00042790454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012739057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010630311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14357814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026448784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404905618","doi":"10.32920/27934593","title":"Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Series (stratigraphy); Primer (cosmetics); Computer science; Biology; Computer security; Chemistry; Paleontology","score_opus":0.6378472806550276,"score_gpt":0.6182650425351772,"score_spread":0.01958223811985038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404905618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028102803,0.29770395,0.0001862737,0.080586545,0.0055426667,0.0013549814,0.00024340207,0.00022291573,0.611349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014990797,0.22358577,0.0016433385,0.004086675,0.00051362085,0.00013706551,0.000053665204,0.00006194722,0.7549271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95952284,0.00037999463,0.0019476991,0.002447931,0.03469255,0.0010090041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98292434,0.002874528,0.00049534295,0.002742473,0.010062751,0.00090054027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06842772,0.00050652557,0.0011099413,0.059669524,0.0001693909,0.0047573084,0.008013455,0.0008890954,0.018272165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116562955,0.00030255632,0.00078396226,0.18736705,0.00028278684,0.0003252535,0.015369183,0.004257931,0.014865466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047034005,0.000020433396,0.0009256643,0.00056610676,0.000047693877,0.000026610038,0.00007267354,0.000007632672,0.00006604951,0.0032431765,0.87587667,0.11914262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006667789,0.00003670178,0.0024039873,0.0010707151,0.000043378543,0.000015485835,0.00008711114,0.00021010036,0.00012242906,0.04011036,0.9554052,0.00042790454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012739057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010630311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14357814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026448784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404923347","doi":"10.1037/cep0000361","title":"Encouraging registered reports at the Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology (CJEP): An invited tutorial by Oshiro et al. (2024).","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Medical education; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3810346380568204,"score_gpt":0.538014081133725,"score_spread":0.15697944307690453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404923347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8911106,0.04527995,0.00018094454,0.023956917,0.03195617,0.00053618656,0.00026415463,0.000021524624,0.006693539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979448,0.00015663207,0.00065604673,0.01729656,0.0008096145,0.000030594605,0.0000402429,0.000105855645,0.0014564358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890996,0.0013568148,0.0032310653,0.0017274355,0.0018331435,0.0027519045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874067,0.00089954725,0.0017431421,0.0021873321,0.0013909627,0.0063723736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023160832,0.00071241753,0.00110312,0.019852692,0.001141352,0.0026646284,0.00505636,0.00058651005,0.004070903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003959602,0.0005591097,0.0007321331,0.015737172,0.0019543231,0.0015291035,0.00019876994,0.002044555,0.00008937362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018129709,0.00024875882,0.01126893,0.0000040634472,0.00018664834,0.008438021,0.00548203,0.00001767326,0.123709075,0.00015156393,0.84716177,0.0031501942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026852028,0.0037134832,0.009207928,0.00015883503,0.000058860558,0.032975134,0.011395093,0.00008373318,0.023502594,0.00220283,0.9130597,0.0009565936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05352891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3167216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26319268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004946658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003816719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405093764","doi":"10.3138/cjc-2023-0027","title":"Fraudulent Practices in the Field of Academic Publishing: The Latindex Experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Profit (economics); Political science; Library science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.6746492702885274,"score_gpt":0.623376634944687,"score_spread":0.05127263534384041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405093764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797079,0.029060246,0.00054040033,0.17744817,0.00043376413,0.00014813035,0.0000051728625,0.0000018334495,0.012654351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980244,0.0010262934,0.00012354435,0.000686117,0.00004340613,0.0000027021647,4.1225493e-7,0.0000023966777,0.00009072764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958218,0.00072091917,0.00066538865,0.00009862799,0.0025084557,0.0001848635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740125,0.02268348,0.0007710667,0.0008969427,0.0014372731,0.00019876198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03547369,0.000046168218,0.00010795633,0.011793367,0.00017425977,0.003252638,0.0064524687,0.00007885599,0.00017753588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1190428,0.000022010547,0.000067561145,0.04255558,0.00016727543,0.0019798973,0.00011898376,0.0011414844,0.000008292732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018357152,0.00003633875,0.22906,0.000010050785,0.000023771381,0.000035480753,0.048534594,0.00022212042,0.00017119801,0.03163169,0.21855068,0.47170573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014240322,0.00012609697,0.23481989,0.00013406477,0.000007999101,0.0000699321,0.027815057,0.005737294,0.00026668076,0.034952465,0.6958441,0.000084004736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006071957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009547916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47729343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000772345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011384515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405349341","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3731","title":"CJHP Joins the International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE), formerly known as the “Granada Group”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Joins; Pharmacy; Library science; Group (periodic table); Political science; Medicine; Family medicine; Computer science; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.1535736718095057,"score_gpt":0.4918691170685766,"score_spread":0.3382954452590709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405349341","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0116702495,0.009386748,0.0000326876,0.063043095,0.911226,0.00050039677,0.0007536268,0.000005571006,0.003381662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29987025,0.0024699855,0.000026967562,0.00037534724,0.6941843,0.000010289056,0.00002182634,0.00006033392,0.0029806953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766649,0.00070582767,0.0023899232,0.00047342665,0.018821973,0.00094397494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96818167,0.009165953,0.0030003507,0.0008237362,0.017337084,0.0014912158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03477759,0.00046723709,0.00068201736,0.018977372,0.001969801,0.01220729,0.013245417,0.00020955503,0.0016511644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037962385,0.00020468276,0.0008612545,0.041246116,0.0011034579,0.0016474279,0.00043685146,0.0047065606,0.00020124218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008050102,0.000049037342,0.0003363821,0.000009904591,0.00037867585,0.0002527003,0.0011542095,0.00004803991,0.000037381298,0.0001636545,0.9790848,0.018404746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010691594,0.00047652124,0.00010165031,0.000071753966,0.00018685476,0.0001399206,0.0013400462,0.00044736537,0.00013282984,0.006806662,0.9889763,0.00025093206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023438325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023885766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28820002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013728901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022549978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405349382","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3744","title":"Le JCPH se joint au International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE), anciennement connu sous le nom de « Granada Group »","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"editorial","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmacy; Humanities; Joint (building); Library science; Political science; Art; Medicine; Family medicine; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1676729555459541,"score_gpt":0.4629586838897999,"score_spread":0.2952857283438458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405349382","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0989995,0.010665103,0.000660203,0.04970266,0.8357423,0.00057954143,0.0014512927,0.0000076248143,0.0021918076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68039453,0.0018483503,0.00023692801,0.00018574014,0.31580386,0.0000076671195,0.000029814137,0.000063408035,0.001429738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98139775,0.00093758747,0.003232779,0.0006907921,0.012002099,0.0017389815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747196,0.002683805,0.0029378568,0.0005359703,0.015352883,0.0037699125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030994715,0.00062184624,0.0010541514,0.03089327,0.0021192986,0.007616533,0.006590936,0.0002865885,0.0013204415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018772148,0.00046987037,0.0009622368,0.03627604,0.0015524763,0.002301583,0.00048061268,0.003759441,0.00011216531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561555,0.00032605883,0.0022519343,0.00006223691,0.0006030366,0.001423268,0.002858787,0.00075254624,0.0005595573,0.0007778991,0.9736158,0.016612694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038727683,0.000772346,0.00038565736,0.00023711378,0.00021512074,0.00031098773,0.0029183782,0.0027292152,0.0011756257,0.0042343033,0.98264134,0.0005071723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1800223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06895348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58139503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057122405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10657595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405430762","doi":"10.62212/snahp.173","title":"Promouvoir l’intégrité en recherche : des principes à la pratique dans les revues scientifiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science of Nursing and Health Practices","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.8978583552714805,"score_gpt":0.7284726311922732,"score_spread":0.16938572407920727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405430762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37099537,0.26764545,0.009740475,0.27503863,0.004492289,0.0011785084,0.00008280925,0.00015521384,0.07067123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7819888,0.08330839,0.114802614,0.00013806415,0.00035558536,0.000026037109,0.000002351628,0.000034153134,0.019344004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847927,0.0041174954,0.0012857172,0.0018348269,0.006472819,0.001496404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971625,0.021175416,0.0013914832,0.0008419391,0.0036873715,0.0012788234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21903765,0.00029637202,0.00052842754,0.023164747,0.0021908407,0.00996367,0.0022313355,0.00038352457,0.00010217798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104216635,0.00022613192,0.00011400526,0.11451371,0.010760805,0.0065113655,0.0005259989,0.0015050797,0.000036508984],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016565406,0.00043898323,0.0029052242,0.0009860175,0.000011828945,0.000019203788,0.03194032,0.000008284301,0.004690196,0.036027487,0.004040596,0.9189153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005279741,0.0037212444,0.09333124,0.026092054,0.000119731376,0.0010600436,0.08678927,0.05689225,0.024008336,0.32616618,0.3801028,0.0011888886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029948687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003473738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016240261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013165821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405540325","doi":"10.18438/eblip30493","title":"Analyzing and Assessing a Library Collection Using Faculty Citations Via OpenAlex and R","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Information retrieval; Collection development; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.3987243497607244,"score_gpt":0.5395182772928999,"score_spread":0.1407939275321755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405540325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51539505,0.020170527,0.33756086,0.11307053,0.0007429448,0.00094925816,0.00009233965,0.00034263288,0.011675848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443979,0.0046819346,0.04434998,0.0058276895,0.00007841404,0.00001319236,0.00003809302,0.000013007771,0.00059975265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970943,0.00034615496,0.0005960135,0.00033825825,0.0014112396,0.00021403552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869565,0.012074325,0.00025968443,0.00018928088,0.00025692367,0.00026329423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004971526,0.00012255022,0.00015227069,0.01557687,0.00062990625,0.023669118,0.00027555195,0.0000838081,0.0002565021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01608471,0.00009364339,0.000034444765,0.04941434,0.0001377304,0.42555478,0.00038650245,0.0002767865,0.000024964536],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030044978,0.000087877386,0.05885113,0.0004551932,0.00008864047,0.000050476632,0.0016399096,0.0008652426,0.0016927439,0.05959416,0.02285413,0.85352004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022158513,0.00011153429,0.0560527,0.00028666967,0.000033983026,0.00011254724,0.002048872,0.7343519,0.00070378673,0.0015966084,0.20426546,0.00021436917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013831847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.156434e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015678927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041099207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99558073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405540378","doi":"10.18438/eblip30665","title":"Evidence Summary Theme: Open Access","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Library science","score_opus":0.5818519236961829,"score_gpt":0.5919576860470508,"score_spread":0.010105762350867908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405540378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006140576,0.078123845,0.043668434,0.6965059,0.002559029,0.002053656,0.000102431324,0.00045030925,0.1703958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7027314,0.10452271,0.015106554,0.16420856,0.00040715333,0.00018251479,0.0000504338,0.000036580055,0.012754121],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931467,0.00064663216,0.0009102245,0.00052976434,0.0043982835,0.00036839867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94385815,0.053792283,0.0003621192,0.00082274794,0.00074933964,0.0004153908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021488162,0.00016450441,0.00020767504,0.017100506,0.000367546,0.0945832,0.0058103083,0.00010183448,0.0033844481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1182745,0.000111713096,0.00007360465,0.08565622,0.00013435267,0.78238827,0.0044644773,0.00043485843,0.0011851377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002779959,0.000035877023,0.0032042519,0.000095497264,0.000014519748,0.000026461421,0.0001037066,0.00006846697,0.000041154308,0.10917548,0.27065358,0.616303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011505995,0.00013365505,0.010684756,0.00074751064,0.0000118397,0.000021345832,0.00029238596,0.03061116,0.0008441566,0.0025803167,0.9537746,0.00018326138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003062737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.698412e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6965908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027646916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011157849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959254},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4405566202","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v19i1.7596","title":"Researcher Perspectives on Obstacles and Facilitators of Open Scholarship at a Canadian University","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.5419767006233982,"score_gpt":0.5462512252384185,"score_spread":0.004274524615020314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405566202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7454247,0.011006235,0.0000058832848,0.13309568,0.000102952865,0.00039718574,0.00012932984,0.0000036374684,0.109834425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287295,0.0037674285,0.00008550647,0.0002921716,0.00002797214,7.1777583e-7,0.0000019905908,0.0000038636495,0.0029474094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547577,0.0013461545,0.00036128607,0.00017507152,0.0022287858,0.00041292995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874982,0.0092453975,0.00013249312,0.00022941445,0.001345021,0.0015494236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031195845,0.0000758425,0.0001474768,0.02276484,0.0011386042,0.008032129,0.0012399039,0.000093854345,0.00032922995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027345648,0.000045870413,0.000037854203,0.020200131,0.00085106853,0.02615578,0.00039336405,0.00091722276,0.000029306011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091670634,0.00002973406,0.058117162,0.000112750065,0.00017424487,0.00037580892,0.038587153,0.00001839621,0.000020909576,0.69204485,0.08032104,0.12928125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021700877,0.00033152144,0.044837188,0.000058508296,0.000005927858,0.000106857944,0.061354835,0.00022102697,0.000054556363,0.004397388,0.8883462,0.000068970556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019656112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8080252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014856875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046214783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99758774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405734082","doi":"10.1177/25152459241283477","title":"Prevalence of Transparent Research Practices in Psychology: A Cross-Sectional Study of Empirical Articles Published in 2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Arnold Ventures; Strong; State Government of Victoria; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Field (mathematics); Political science; Empirical research; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.8275100584952197,"score_gpt":0.8086616933891463,"score_spread":0.01884836510607346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405734082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770199,0.015649274,0.0010909857,0.0010726184,0.00070625916,0.0006319244,0.000006954221,0.000008379222,0.0038136998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695391,0.009690444,0.020572698,0.000044867124,0.000023572966,0.00008950954,1.9633934e-7,0.000005242964,0.000034389377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97457445,0.009046784,0.0029029401,0.0032635073,0.008996689,0.0012156144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462753,0.05056478,0.0010446216,0.0008916648,0.00099526,0.00022835127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27071324,0.00018277019,0.000541155,0.03238169,0.00013097137,0.001336414,0.003534342,0.00020593728,0.00043527162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24619234,0.0001209701,0.00005764127,0.18387854,0.002636769,0.0064442093,0.00072361046,0.001851589,0.000004975118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032217716,0.0020683347,0.790387,0.000046045858,0.0000018036919,0.000057651203,0.0009597334,0.00018018928,0.0017753365,0.00039978503,0.000011405251,0.20379056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000710838,0.0012315514,0.9227402,0.000049711667,0.0000016874117,0.000017127937,0.0016941237,0.004610536,0.00015242674,0.06775197,0.00091367454,0.00012615272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003616231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006756564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2036644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013238286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021482201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405881678","doi":"10.5430/ijba.v15n4p22","title":"The Role of ESG Performance in Enhancing Intellectual Capital and Sustainability in European Football Clubs: A First Empirical Application","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Business Administration","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Football; Corporate governance; Business; Social capital; Intellectual capital; Sustainability; Marketing; Relational capital; Accounting; Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Finance; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13939874979540084,"score_gpt":0.4865201036627376,"score_spread":0.3471213538673368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405881678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846298,0.0009206643,0.010409895,0.0031728658,0.00030119732,0.000110252535,0.0000022905983,0.0000028153383,0.0004502297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00045726198,0.00006179353,0.000009023403,0.00010494737,0.0000033651952,0.0000014396533,0.0000046626283,0.000029803363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625343,0.0001423933,0.0010147196,0.00021208303,0.0022305252,0.00014685257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317235,0.0028262956,0.00027296055,0.00012716501,0.0035401515,0.000061053885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090274345,0.00007447171,0.0001403502,0.007585944,0.00005477688,0.000934101,0.0008032567,0.000039835424,0.000011418816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017077189,0.000048109385,0.000047845788,0.014221488,0.00012649693,0.0006906454,0.00015991992,0.00022753088,0.0000044178055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033766995,0.00025644072,0.47660777,0.000032378233,0.00002049195,0.00007444496,0.0023577528,0.00095604867,0.0006193288,0.0015446405,0.00009957003,0.5170935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031091383,0.00021652372,0.9277876,0.00008856097,0.0000031042052,0.00015406281,0.002214079,0.05070946,0.0012136105,0.008768943,0.008450712,0.00008242182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003121307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033598323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51701105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025224316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005538078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405901445","doi":"","title":"Making the Move to Open Journal Systems 3: Recommendations for a (mostly) painless upgrade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Upgrade; Computer science; World Wide Web; Operating system","score_opus":0.8221029351515965,"score_gpt":0.6858394329636437,"score_spread":0.1362635021879528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405901445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33526015,0.0012343933,0.1746693,0.42470044,0.0085643,0.006785646,0.00009713791,0.000047540096,0.0486411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427357,0.000024876032,0.0046117282,0.00145979,0.00018140645,0.00007963081,0.0000016569584,0.000016800124,0.05088842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949997,0.00032411085,0.00046665684,0.0004269655,0.003260275,0.0005223144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905431,0.006318304,0.00027205562,0.00077355676,0.0018202516,0.00027267495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032394473,0.00010442444,0.0002459993,0.011911266,0.00057489076,0.011657855,0.0048678727,0.00005591731,0.00060048205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01346086,0.00005662723,0.00011290776,0.06358881,0.000029732468,0.00044687392,0.0012190863,0.00024444066,0.0005297882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066721484,0.00008903108,0.009221869,0.000009343844,0.00003922146,0.000003945666,0.004577907,0.0008380753,0.00043736203,0.031936187,0.88082176,0.07195858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039734106,0.00014988692,0.0036761116,0.000022151486,0.000003952897,0.000021001346,0.014723564,0.010628407,0.000063508516,0.0030521888,0.96713483,0.0001270679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083954306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008241806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6074755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013958283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020685422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405936732","doi":"10.1109/la-cci62337.2024.10814799","title":"Improvements to Dual Annealing in SciPy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Annealing (glass); Computer science; Materials science","score_opus":0.7238762468832122,"score_gpt":0.6636454143631704,"score_spread":0.0602308325200418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405936732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93963563,0.00057017413,0.013304257,0.003878514,0.0014095635,0.00027147323,0.000014889535,0.000057931138,0.040857587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98397666,0.000014224039,0.0011504,0.00038735382,0.00006901602,0.000009486699,6.544522e-7,0.0000060901966,0.014386113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925869,0.000053484335,0.00044787972,0.00064469746,0.005779667,0.00048734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964939,0.0022724678,0.000017724702,0.00036227822,0.00052470644,0.00032895815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018507026,0.00007647904,0.00013276347,0.09405044,0.000064075146,0.0041931733,0.0009650302,0.000045903816,0.0015275506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015103886,0.000048103186,0.00005875933,0.30038258,0.000026376732,0.00046837082,0.00067403377,0.00014986344,0.0032762762],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009881299,0.000059816233,0.029080557,0.000006009472,0.0000063305815,0.00012250025,0.00029318625,0.00017146878,0.006209935,0.007450916,0.06843769,0.8881517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007920311,0.0006677474,0.154225,0.000069612004,0.0000035049923,0.000009097118,0.0019917898,0.28616327,0.013599914,0.04250537,0.4992695,0.0007031472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025256627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000858902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88744855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101592625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012938237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406195046","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01282-9","title":"Investigating the trustworthiness of research evidence used to inform public health policy: a qualitative interview study on the use of predatory journal citations in policy documents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Health services research; Public health; Trustworthiness; Health administration; Health policy; Qualitative research; Peer review; Health economics; Public health policy; Social policy; Public policy; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Nursing; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9789561516613032,"score_gpt":0.7890776357586877,"score_spread":0.1898785159026155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406195046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61303836,0.0021375238,0.00027531033,0.37945098,0.00013626595,0.004500573,0.00008405233,0.0000074723507,0.00036946608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493825,0.0010910936,0.000049985654,0.0018912236,0.00016706654,0.00033812894,9.78632e-7,0.000012414998,0.001510843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8479736,0.102214925,0.007009926,0.0014682339,0.036849327,0.0044839876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65074694,0.30676112,0.0025138643,0.004054273,0.032396607,0.0035272413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45202458,0.00020401517,0.00084055844,0.11287322,0.0023505567,0.003964072,0.0035366716,0.000105711224,0.000009929911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6065224,0.00010669633,0.00010471061,0.31289807,0.0012987694,0.001144783,0.0019023222,0.0020530357,0.000015007494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011042464,0.00091316976,0.09692715,0.0013241534,0.00011949482,0.0000038842986,0.41890675,0.00036742206,0.00003490135,0.35172758,0.046317093,0.08324799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015646872,0.0053514973,0.43376574,0.0052957395,0.0000019874858,0.000012236664,0.47000244,0.004299806,0.0000135373175,0.026077528,0.0533712,0.00024360596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111512884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004136169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002065063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02634879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989483},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406367101","doi":"10.1002/asi.24979","title":"Evaluating the linguistic coverage of <scp>OpenAlex</scp>: An assessment of metadata accuracy and completeness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Scopus; Publishing; English language; Completeness (order theory); World Wide Web; Quality (philosophy); Information retrieval; Library science; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.37366020321620774,"score_gpt":0.602059430984761,"score_spread":0.22839922776855326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406367101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98412454,0.00013161202,0.011004023,0.0024533935,0.00040672458,0.00030960463,0.000037229216,0.0000032931237,0.0015295653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812526,0.0001097416,0.0015268777,0.00011185621,0.000009286389,0.0000031754257,6.190571e-7,9.387446e-7,0.00011224476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429756,0.00011925877,0.0010588552,0.00011347054,0.004224605,0.0001862736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97192734,0.008112122,0.003310392,0.0004006712,0.016197735,0.000051710394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05486309,0.000057831094,0.00025204322,0.012461296,0.0004840068,0.00092412194,0.002057218,0.00007111753,0.0000013709989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2872457,0.000029087745,0.000053691147,0.04410224,0.00038710836,0.0027228352,0.00060958765,0.00019356495,2.730366e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018274945,0.00010795418,0.42378888,0.00004782922,0.00009236397,1.3557728e-7,0.0009161767,0.00068647537,0.010384566,0.20584962,0.0012865629,0.35682115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015363633,0.0007928904,0.74699265,0.000059046262,0.00008134722,0.00001477655,0.003945458,0.09231553,0.009448286,0.11514127,0.029606968,0.000065396314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009754604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033435354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35675576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013658496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085380836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406433090","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5088105","title":"equity is not Equity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Equity capital markets; Business; Economics; Finance; Private equity; Political science","score_opus":0.4862423886454763,"score_gpt":0.6123007699302478,"score_spread":0.12605838128477154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406433090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4737031,0.022599502,0.20578288,0.04436221,0.0037256863,0.0005185539,0.000043894404,0.00009229781,0.24917191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95286334,0.006791933,0.00011480009,0.001041784,0.0001572383,0.000002754188,6.2787075e-7,0.000007689061,0.03901984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458236,0.0002794668,0.0008424796,0.0006328443,0.009113752,0.0045490926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422383,0.0016961399,0.0002893014,0.00074215414,0.0026889446,0.0003596206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08678161,0.00017341973,0.00033712783,0.037458863,0.00069771614,0.0036643143,0.0047742757,0.00014608032,0.0005611798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022715148,0.00011833801,0.00033009308,0.1330125,0.00014268693,0.00069103047,0.002554204,0.0026721482,0.000609781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004475806,0.00009120795,0.009043544,0.0000023889118,0.000059355796,0.0000062788035,0.000039872408,0.0000058830074,0.00047513642,0.20430183,0.01797681,0.7679529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005729031,0.00019499875,0.009794346,0.000011650966,0.000010318036,0.000070726615,0.0005370117,0.00067300774,0.0010885918,0.9501648,0.036734875,0.00014677635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007762334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001839613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019450902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071303896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406620494","doi":"10.1111/nin.12698","title":"On the Evolving Complexities of Peer Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Nursing Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Psychology; Data science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.6524244283368151,"score_gpt":0.6144268947219702,"score_spread":0.037997533614844925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406620494","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027791299,0.030205894,0.0004960752,0.01001486,0.8727627,0.00039364034,0.00021153998,0.000021693037,0.08586582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024866613,0.009663279,0.00051622454,0.0012740702,0.8526071,0.00005306922,0.00020303318,0.00006283324,0.13313374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96239275,0.0007222421,0.0011851676,0.0008150412,0.03433699,0.00054778607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8273183,0.1285303,0.0014746279,0.0037186723,0.03866749,0.00029061193],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04743449,0.00028132778,0.0009003143,0.029275993,0.00036478645,0.00151925,0.0051734797,0.00046965343,0.0014239198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50082314,0.00015608255,0.0004015982,0.09496531,0.0010598961,0.00018303009,0.000458074,0.0013567831,0.00018993419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010920091,0.00007313406,0.000008165612,0.00017052137,0.000016267359,0.000001862943,0.00018672348,0.0000019687825,0.00000222555,0.0034858955,0.9703856,0.02565673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010676956,0.00011320513,0.00012482636,0.006889995,0.00002905372,3.988228e-7,0.00033902985,0.00013367244,0.00001854008,0.030950168,0.9611326,0.00016174985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035391957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015331669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45338866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033543608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010927382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406633347","doi":"10.1039/d4dd90053g","title":"Commit: Mini article for dynamic reporting of incremental improvements to previous scholarly work","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Discovery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Work (physics); Computer science; Data science; Database; Engineering","score_opus":0.30089369212540784,"score_gpt":0.531694957699371,"score_spread":0.2308012655739632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406633347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738044,0.00022026055,0.017112164,0.00040268962,0.0003622764,0.00068515714,0.00021409873,0.000014867057,0.0071840836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990858,0.0000046869613,0.0007065756,0.00022068166,0.0000134978,0.000039737406,0.000014584227,0.000008728207,0.008133506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405414,0.000033468048,0.0018138125,0.00058945414,0.003036,0.000473143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546707,0.0016136925,0.00074796693,0.0006949135,0.0012892777,0.00018707415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075374306,0.00013094708,0.0003631662,0.011180001,0.00014464231,0.007438022,0.001296927,0.00005864415,0.000018387906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07911914,0.00009906881,0.00023195425,0.057294432,0.00007975421,0.0035808762,0.0011018539,0.00011891819,0.000043968816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015679891,0.00041455688,0.6134141,0.00002864798,0.000055080647,0.000005547228,0.00008323306,0.00003622519,0.01047321,0.00071554544,0.0075927903,0.36702424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016011118,0.00072302535,0.9352271,0.00018697562,0.000023187155,0.0000020007637,0.001746436,0.0018643496,0.025043806,0.022236701,0.010906025,0.00043928224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027176597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008425487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36658496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014265992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018138778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406652426","doi":"10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v11.42153","title":"An Environmental Scan of Bibliometrics and Research Impact Open Instructional Trends at Canadian Academic Research Libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Library science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.7118459255119588,"score_gpt":0.6195203741576483,"score_spread":0.09232555135431053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406652426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95758134,0.01214668,0.000026531065,0.00927279,0.00071811344,0.0003516404,0.0007272998,0.000004930695,0.019170657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924285,0.0016698801,0.00059574336,0.00024910294,0.00032592102,0.0000072388902,0.000022894044,0.00003314938,0.00466756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834461,0.0025118545,0.002019663,0.0009340568,0.008920245,0.0021680773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98054665,0.008373755,0.0005660662,0.0009787389,0.0021444128,0.0073903636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06993535,0.0002998,0.00077715726,0.49421203,0.0017248992,0.005162766,0.011941027,0.0010462117,0.003074234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032350026,0.00023908207,0.00020508614,0.39380085,0.0028643282,0.008152584,0.0014292202,0.005594671,0.000038741673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011762996,0.000019799558,0.71039677,0.00000841275,0.000056634795,0.00008142249,0.0004696341,0.000024408433,0.0005820061,0.011014895,0.14461926,0.13260913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086176954,0.00055497454,0.8127616,0.000086446234,0.0000114811555,0.00020681103,0.0018599813,0.00028233707,0.0011109688,0.06131027,0.12071858,0.00023478124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111647286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036546215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13237435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024355508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03067065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406674461","doi":"10.7202/1115297ar","title":"La science comme champ","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.9526441350234139,"score_gpt":0.7574967400603366,"score_spread":0.19514739496307731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406674461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46816742,0.014343667,0.0013980248,0.23334166,0.02781668,0.00077851524,0.000368044,0.00063543563,0.25315055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94453305,0.01622638,0.0005525935,0.0014424814,0.00026305558,0.000035369856,0.000015212237,0.000030276475,0.036901608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825884,0.0023115857,0.0008752915,0.0016060703,0.0100363195,0.0025823296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656202,0.029154373,0.00031304156,0.0012752835,0.0027858866,0.0008511747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13127227,0.00034555915,0.00061596755,0.034850284,0.0014966963,0.0037611143,0.0066380994,0.0007973086,0.005444823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11373876,0.00027776667,0.00045329795,0.28087625,0.009659096,0.0014520941,0.004850527,0.0016935868,0.0142442845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114295335,0.00022681148,0.023283664,0.000027077993,0.00004177055,0.00015993071,0.0029340868,0.00008212287,0.0010839087,0.07086155,0.2371956,0.66409206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081116677,0.0003011224,0.11156147,0.00004248978,0.000010592185,0.000017755525,0.020586217,0.005323268,0.00041328426,0.634134,0.22618851,0.00061010354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015402293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036538627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66348195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067725487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030188947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406900259","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77193","title":"Reviewers’ views on the editorial review processes of the Canadian Medical Education Journal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Medical education; Work (physics); Descriptive statistics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2878703393976841,"score_gpt":0.5613766508686644,"score_spread":0.2735063114709803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406900259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010470875,0.08271635,0.000024176992,0.77331966,0.1108256,0.00063061825,0.000013078127,0.0000031621491,0.03142028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07254841,0.19867104,0.00017142616,0.6534229,0.06056219,0.00013354137,0.000011427147,0.000041271796,0.014437809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97939104,0.0013796116,0.0015799723,0.00035006017,0.01661376,0.00068556453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8556417,0.009845685,0.0030625125,0.003498989,0.064229205,0.06372186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0594734,0.00018546943,0.00042136683,0.014590549,0.0016848126,0.001626625,0.005856158,0.0003655598,0.051405173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.84970576,0.00008789124,0.00027513262,0.07174923,0.0004679042,0.00031102131,0.000109086664,0.0027034075,0.00017590403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015969204,0.00006181122,0.0007153202,0.000059874175,0.000010683733,0.0000032891264,0.00008163668,1.9368544e-7,1.3596429e-7,0.0013025178,0.7766239,0.22113906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119762444,0.000031657855,0.0020499383,0.004540025,0.00001942593,0.00025782813,0.00038626808,0.000015374677,0.000003460526,0.0039049885,0.9885808,0.00009043587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041003812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4282646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79023236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013600882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6215107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406946826","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1","title":"A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Communications Psychology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8712495094375736,"score_gpt":0.7657096778831722,"score_spread":0.10553983155440139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406946826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.609631e-7,0.88733864,0.0029580095,0.0021883196,0.0005102808,0.0023698832,0.00028150468,0.000017084098,0.10433552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004512084,0.98093194,0.013690231,0.00052426977,0.000028193597,0.00062426063,0.00004473234,0.00001316488,0.004098099],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929689,0.0007740074,0.0012455457,0.00157021,0.0024796615,0.00096163707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710806,0.015684996,0.0007481031,0.008034435,0.004072454,0.00037941034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040085822,0.00029815375,0.0014125267,0.049420442,0.0024103974,0.004823485,0.060130004,0.0003319821,0.00009330542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05163437,0.00022133364,0.00025457158,0.17515332,0.0022320892,0.0006748119,0.07833701,0.00052631367,0.00017041001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045588718,0.000117452386,0.000025203282,0.00019718062,0.000024100185,0.0000011515185,0.000023440954,5.0209056e-8,3.2597558e-7,0.036386847,0.035827953,0.9273917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003210074,0.00010335486,0.00012307074,0.0005497228,0.000077647004,0.000032828037,0.00009247533,0.00005036135,5.2957777e-8,0.02216084,0.9762752,0.0002134291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005582515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007787842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003095374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028602574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407036447","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.154408.2","title":"Publisher preferences for a journal transparency tool: A modified three-round Delphi study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; McMaster University; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Open peer review; Transparency (behavior); Plant biology; Delphi; Delphi method; Open science; Physiology; Psychology; Medicine; Neuroscience; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Statistics; Botany","score_opus":0.8494189618904909,"score_gpt":0.6382811941320977,"score_spread":0.2111377677583932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407036447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76948375,0.005668252,0.1457753,0.004858711,0.010310025,0.012979724,0.0012749893,0.00019051836,0.049458746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526862,0.0006302453,0.0028658812,0.00007821433,0.00068655796,0.0014312689,0.00005602363,0.00005555233,0.04151007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603068,0.0017473532,0.002816058,0.0028165288,0.030009722,0.0023035328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95657647,0.016781606,0.000721158,0.003238143,0.021536317,0.0011463208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09990531,0.00065030716,0.0014043475,0.10142752,0.0012816673,0.03641225,0.018927535,0.00079190754,0.0013652687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08750342,0.0004502021,0.00090808264,0.11024878,0.0004398609,0.0014196311,0.006970163,0.004074984,0.00014927829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076863455,0.0028734535,0.1758092,0.00022363181,0.000556868,0.00009259389,0.0014103873,0.0013344045,0.00002268764,0.0013717032,0.4454829,0.37005353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035113986,0.0021411527,0.20293525,0.0001726469,0.000103633116,0.00001413865,0.0024014143,0.026541136,0.000020156422,0.72265494,0.038429443,0.0010747052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008035973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001175378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005483059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061664917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407111140","doi":"10.54857/6p8bqj06","title":"Mapping the research trend and international collaboration of IIT Delhi","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information and Knowledge Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New delhi; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6850340464915459,"score_gpt":0.6392744208791217,"score_spread":0.04575962561242419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407111140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79738957,0.09146683,0.0069077816,0.04667332,0.01226679,0.00036769517,0.00013893977,0.00002052173,0.04476853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888727,0.009741486,0.00028987677,0.000047860583,0.0002525247,0.000002941429,0.0000021121996,0.0000022380493,0.00078827096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548006,0.0001464846,0.0009455646,0.00010260412,0.0032029387,0.000122333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832727,0.0035880895,0.00030883373,0.00008878675,0.0126697365,0.00007190781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01624383,0.000069141584,0.00015985472,0.021040058,0.00015756961,0.001895432,0.00082067255,0.000037485635,0.000047935482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016279614,0.0000373183,0.000060489438,0.014091369,0.0003235726,0.0020395962,0.00053614593,0.00023732557,0.000022609047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007693484,0.00004045268,0.0043621124,0.000031532392,0.000408139,0.0000063895995,0.02961995,0.000023721483,0.00020490821,0.023728577,0.06575044,0.87574685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084516784,0.00021359706,0.022876214,0.00026193247,0.000011035441,0.00017896497,0.086414225,0.015006968,0.0003867684,0.027019206,0.84666836,0.00011754502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000048884535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002246566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8756293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010613916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021386072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407186206","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.1430","title":"Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Kempestiftelserna; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.2965073675035227,"score_gpt":0.5119618618658536,"score_spread":0.21545449436233088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407186206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98794997,0.00022760523,0.000037704394,0.0038121913,0.00046474126,0.00019488946,0.0000144911455,0.000009616721,0.0072888043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986296,0.000089506175,0.00041583923,0.00020086656,0.000019351488,0.000010382425,2.2199868e-7,0.000001244387,0.00063298084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961431,0.0000505835,0.0005652776,0.0005601495,0.0022650145,0.00041584324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612474,0.0022777577,0.00039673081,0.000092080896,0.0010360313,0.00007268032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013351568,0.000115412586,0.00028896876,0.001356284,0.0004707241,0.0003256831,0.0024064179,0.00018443077,0.000041105515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016039647,0.00005583513,0.00019853919,0.02368604,0.0026710574,0.00016281958,0.0015251769,0.0002480743,0.0000020993582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017964536,0.00015105504,0.9791746,0.000007858875,0.000009589722,3.4682703e-8,0.00080480566,0.000080110476,0.0019538829,0.014568058,0.0016620726,0.0015699683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025186647,0.00023707231,0.95528334,0.000042011616,0.0000021865346,1.7669028e-7,0.008463238,0.008569532,0.0023526824,0.02442309,0.0002971278,0.00007769044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047960006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005942082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023891274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013429871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011228729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407358242","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111719","title":"Cochrane reviews’ authorship has become more gender-diverse but remains geographically concentrated: a meta-research study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bruyère; University of Ottawa; McMaster University; Impact; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Cochrane collaboration; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Geography; Medicine; Library science; Genealogy; History; Political science; Cochrane Library; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.970973840257367,"score_gpt":0.7733534434701769,"score_spread":0.19762039678719012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407358242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89975995,0.029575579,0.008691516,0.054523576,0.0045428197,0.001319721,0.000040690386,0.000022593063,0.0015235797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97517556,0.0136333555,0.005104902,0.00378737,0.0006395314,0.000022848468,0.0000022670656,0.000015001685,0.0016191751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7941562,0.14303437,0.034903094,0.003282779,0.02070614,0.0039174356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24770416,0.70541245,0.010111348,0.0035146768,0.02937608,0.0038812663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7270951,0.00038639654,0.007668905,0.040539324,0.00063967344,0.00073208875,0.0064635384,0.00085091905,0.0015287693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8965565,0.00021066048,0.0035816042,0.1024492,0.002687672,0.00047569303,0.0015242028,0.005387556,0.0002381671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045352243,0.0013955116,0.86129886,0.000028066046,0.0013962367,0.00032478385,0.00014894758,0.00011065877,0.000016919414,0.004304697,0.10819347,0.02232832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023766086,0.0027051773,0.79835075,0.00006458397,0.0006175942,0.000055137323,0.001728428,0.0014236823,0.0000049508453,0.097376116,0.0950361,0.0002608971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015331706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007983102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5623781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013238858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017683251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407567707","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88709-7","title":"Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Server; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science","score_opus":0.4510459083690589,"score_gpt":0.543189825935932,"score_spread":0.09214391756687312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407567707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549095,0.000456831,0.026684478,0.00091589714,0.006770961,0.00045926622,0.0000025280874,0.00003987713,0.009760655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836569,0.0000277323,0.002555314,0.0000701634,0.00002367259,0.000015933787,0.000023039962,0.0000051470706,0.013622086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160975,0.00017334438,0.00095446734,0.00128033,0.0056138365,0.00036827585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449074,0.0010133578,0.00043086597,0.0010261353,0.0028910078,0.00014791406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023683485,0.00012368646,0.00019825924,0.023366207,0.00063934026,0.0053641032,0.00048152867,0.0000999132,0.00017040283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021597527,0.00009598189,0.00008962441,0.104604766,0.00027488504,0.0013037964,0.00036632997,0.00012773482,0.000054249092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040307496,0.00021855257,0.5422539,0.000060419745,0.000044153156,0.00011211608,0.0025856614,0.0019186933,0.028725466,0.014369965,0.11934726,0.2903235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001929215,0.000033183816,0.5133958,0.000025406613,0.000009586112,0.000017985625,0.0005953054,0.008907164,0.0068343193,0.41978312,0.050046664,0.00015854185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001153159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000465362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40541315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001210028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022391317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407641680","doi":"10.54932/goth7434","title":"L’effet du coût des études supérieures sur les choix de filières stratégiques, scientifiques et mathématiques au Québec et au Canada","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3870720134191277,"score_gpt":0.5021308695992517,"score_spread":0.11505885618012396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407641680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5314862,0.019853389,0.0066934046,0.015748966,0.00442843,0.0018190797,0.003249268,0.0003136801,0.4164076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72076094,0.026364725,0.005528804,0.00115388,0.0005957561,0.00016510193,0.00030999398,0.00011235505,0.24500847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665301,0.003418398,0.003384307,0.0031817239,0.020109335,0.0033761258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9380436,0.034774564,0.0014682022,0.0025786662,0.020891633,0.002243348],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06982567,0.0014322842,0.002191747,0.049082108,0.0023063016,0.011671408,0.007528417,0.0012098899,0.0033017672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14395249,0.0010869825,0.0008303819,0.09806766,0.0024650625,0.0020054756,0.0034598983,0.002084027,0.000052316085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005164055,0.00064670836,0.54242516,0.0013405599,0.00031877885,0.00048915297,0.0015534693,0.0002300997,0.00024605458,0.032152776,0.32890195,0.091643676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003433388,0.00026459794,0.3220011,0.0011357735,0.000081388105,0.00013387554,0.0015933968,0.0014968703,0.0022600526,0.0016694951,0.6679274,0.001092765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3390254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012377104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2854593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407652817","doi":"10.1144/esss2024-013","title":"Research students are diverse, while those in salaried positions are not: results from a survey of Canadian academic geoscience","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth Science Systems and Society","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Mississauga","keywords":"Earth science; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Data science; Engineering; Psychology; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6487163512115388,"score_gpt":0.578458086968049,"score_spread":0.0702582642434898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407652817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939781,0.0007122818,0.000103307204,0.0006883234,0.000707491,0.0005281057,0.0015542386,0.000009395362,0.0017187452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970986,0.0006047261,0.00017554834,0.00010378091,0.00002441746,0.000013146919,0.000008455781,0.000003959275,0.0019673414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837472,0.00084408815,0.0010506691,0.001447016,0.011703797,0.0012072279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871681,0.005219809,0.0003691175,0.0009413848,0.005495828,0.00080581603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10210207,0.000156126,0.0004628581,0.034838963,0.0016209997,0.002816832,0.004160486,0.00024046973,0.000019904624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030749194,0.00011972365,0.00008925386,0.28397006,0.0021184995,0.0010271887,0.0014751925,0.0008445217,0.000029641897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001728403,0.000072704366,0.98856664,0.0000075503663,0.0000065887243,0.000007059437,0.0019206837,0.00009005306,0.00072040927,0.00044889582,0.0071093333,0.0010328261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050262944,0.000040519262,0.9776408,0.00016369655,0.0000015878637,6.2721284e-7,0.013861417,0.0060290196,0.00012437822,0.00015485528,0.0013613581,0.00011911962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54497844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1917414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.353237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025635486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002451738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407778781","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091666","title":"Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Arthritis Research Centre of Canada; Research Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Qualitative research; Peer review; Health services research; Public health; Medical education; Family medicine; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.8962373543290585,"score_gpt":0.7766862850356947,"score_spread":0.11955106929336379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407778781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09101874,0.0066205496,0.0058264467,0.2299385,0.0019082128,0.06670598,0.0001569732,0.00005649312,0.5977681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35006043,0.0002552188,0.002156211,0.009401736,0.000051437604,0.0028732673,0.000005969952,0.000013183773,0.63518256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814546,0.001415519,0.0010020812,0.0009888189,0.0146690365,0.00046990623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827894,0.0054515866,0.00019476097,0.0018772474,0.009316726,0.0003702779],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1516526,0.00012907274,0.000540154,0.024694387,0.000248169,0.0038005456,0.006248693,0.00003732049,0.0009976395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1575221,0.00007830441,0.00010489051,0.2279157,0.00004722839,0.0004762956,0.0048319455,0.0001551491,0.0023515932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070745955,0.00032351783,0.007460911,0.000019415802,0.000027267995,0.00002034392,0.0051736427,0.0000014385906,0.00000933305,0.0014252751,0.88140297,0.10406516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022491324,0.0012872776,0.18767716,0.0007734797,0.00003912523,0.0000042854012,0.08333771,0.00016356543,0.00012231886,0.090209566,0.6335143,0.00062207744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039643736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018124208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2590417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008337283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042974504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407867924","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8909","title":"Reflections on Co-Production as a Mode of Knowledge Production; Comment on \"Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact\"","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coproduction; Knowledge production; Production (economics); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Business; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.6570034211964689,"score_gpt":0.7343118395520892,"score_spread":0.0773084183556203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407867924","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003938612,0.00065171305,0.0009967058,0.23613346,0.734413,0.0018792686,0.00037722307,0.000025457412,0.021584539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15635636,0.01909695,0.0014146573,0.0050866078,0.7733034,0.00016002182,0.00015470703,0.00008689788,0.044340424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818335,0.0013614269,0.0018337735,0.0009367683,0.013450644,0.0005838555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98236,0.002557738,0.0012334824,0.0008620307,0.012417009,0.0005697486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032749202,0.00027486467,0.00065130065,0.08525334,0.00056979497,0.000813414,0.0021364712,0.00020449815,0.00006342802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350474,0.00020553182,0.00021179319,0.026568199,0.00018296838,0.00040858812,0.0005249432,0.0012006065,0.00006261526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006081355,0.0011378512,0.000011990081,0.00007996041,0.00022594462,0.000010977596,0.0006255277,0.001354687,0.00001924165,0.0105137965,0.8939165,0.09149543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056395243,0.0033777163,0.00036408726,0.00042190382,0.000008269805,0.000017142334,0.00059818436,0.00002459786,0.0003189448,0.010877465,0.9832885,0.0001392391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001763529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013692009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23104686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029655292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003114883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598825},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4407884387","doi":"10.1038/s41562-025-02125-5","title":"How institutions can better support international early-career researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.648656325410493,"score_gpt":0.5813698532562874,"score_spread":0.06728647215420558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407884387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01971104,0.00029426828,0.000112738075,0.9364486,0.0051140804,0.0007165927,0.002212124,0.00010183098,0.03528878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24254458,0.00005070689,0.00038184063,0.30003107,0.004740625,0.00011797846,0.0019802826,0.00006660301,0.45008633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721248,0.00046957668,0.0009136002,0.0020249747,0.022987658,0.0014793554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871432,0.001521068,0.00046875354,0.0022084224,0.00817773,0.00048079208],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008974437,0.000566127,0.0007165169,0.09146254,0.0008219711,0.012674548,0.010478766,0.0037331376,0.0030357572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015594227,0.00044126165,0.00069059385,0.065297596,0.00062810833,0.00081275945,0.0024536364,0.014237336,0.00027482538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004486048,0.00006118415,0.06819725,0.000008572452,0.000063288,0.000854561,0.00004455658,3.2628313e-7,0.00002717749,0.00041937875,0.9245516,0.0057675983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004035768,0.00008458601,0.079254515,0.000031302032,0.000038335358,0.000014265207,0.000057301935,0.0000037306058,0.00006490796,0.0017260483,0.91789234,0.00042907716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032957675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018708209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6364175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009509961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014500261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407918365","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5152665","title":"The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.3310630732154118,"score_gpt":0.5286070715078648,"score_spread":0.197543998292453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407918365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498385,0.026239123,0.008446667,0.0061375555,0.0012639996,0.00046283205,0.000043778506,0.000007823944,0.0075596767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603525,0.1283841,0.00009612584,0.000017437818,0.00015867606,0.00001020226,0.0000016980175,0.000008559789,0.010970717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898319,0.0009976506,0.0014243495,0.0006002634,0.0044858865,0.002659938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890086,0.0064497045,0.00087065547,0.00088823854,0.0026483547,0.00013445517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14059286,0.00016331868,0.00039438027,0.039766744,0.00031494346,0.002360313,0.0053658145,0.00027744423,0.00002743621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033323534,0.000097654374,0.00028345358,0.046761073,0.00016781152,0.0002249321,0.0020876396,0.005606769,0.00001622316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016357459,0.00016250604,0.047118858,0.000014471119,0.00020748748,0.0000038676126,0.00051821215,0.0056821294,0.000023972429,0.2106584,0.0007853888,0.73466116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028583274,0.0000901437,0.030553943,0.00003146471,0.0000053261883,0.0000121538105,0.0009634278,0.0062454287,0.000033401615,0.9578076,0.003870497,0.00010075578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005123704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028283775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018729192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013744683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408202934","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2776","title":"Impact of a Fulbright award: A bibliometric analysis of persistence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health SA Gesondheid","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Library science; Humanities; Psychology; Art; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5185590538425793,"score_gpt":0.6212961476712524,"score_spread":0.10273709382867313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408202934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97822225,0.011163812,0.0046106926,0.0012802131,0.00027649614,0.00034012165,0.00028582438,0.00001856598,0.0038020497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616784,0.0014669325,0.0008061823,0.00015498565,0.0000144716105,0.0000079778465,0.000008768672,0.000006553116,0.0013662907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883493,0.0004588943,0.001883635,0.00084643025,0.0075429794,0.0009187653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860917,0.005774619,0.0010490285,0.0014835516,0.0050108484,0.0005902889],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024036082,0.00020254795,0.001331271,0.86534745,0.00020217174,0.00036648184,0.0024687196,0.00013789425,0.0010035554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021191578,0.00013447086,0.0011673699,0.97327375,0.000267047,0.00031595162,0.0005507967,0.0002594576,0.00004361205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053080603,0.00032560786,0.8249309,0.000050396575,0.00050295854,0.0000023409207,0.00016922478,0.0002783983,0.00017343163,0.0003661247,0.016987922,0.15615958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659744,0.00048573758,0.98639166,0.000023583872,0.00008645539,0.0000010975282,0.00018074979,0.008396437,0.00019273878,0.00047018842,0.003300693,0.00010465735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002394888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009058295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16146076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019813897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990964},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4408263149","doi":"10.29173/pathfinder108","title":"Beware of Predatory Publishers!","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pathfinder A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Predatory pricing; Economics","score_opus":0.3442162620506865,"score_gpt":0.5494086683825756,"score_spread":0.20519240633188912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408263149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98204434,0.00043343048,0.0037980406,0.001626976,0.0032228047,0.0006518845,0.00017310047,0.000006104266,0.008043305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.000012066743,0.00031930202,0.0006270685,0.000028013355,0.000019684796,0.0000026746372,0.0000028651107,0.0019644587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990931,0.00008032705,0.0010261687,0.0002763413,0.0070121684,0.00067401805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98678744,0.0006762255,0.00044216294,0.00034204603,0.010670491,0.0010816224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028973904,0.0001238566,0.00025808756,0.039290354,0.0017538306,0.009871887,0.0030485976,0.00010726238,0.00014240837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020401264,0.00008399855,0.00010987765,0.038906645,0.0005187163,0.010043285,0.00038052566,0.00029151043,0.000012340554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001656551,0.000025698768,0.87064296,0.000022426186,0.000022175676,0.000001349045,0.0034946357,0.000015943684,0.00002741455,0.0041307737,0.03698592,0.08461414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063014246,0.00008804966,0.9138122,0.00006461023,0.000005960488,0.0000054063917,0.008902731,0.0001601988,0.00010653802,0.0055580963,0.07054196,0.0001240837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009954426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003693478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08449005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019877854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062844874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408386221","doi":"10.1002/asi.24989","title":"What's in a name? Scholarly journal title changes and the quest for international visibility (1965–2020)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Internationalization; Visibility; Impact factor; Scopus; Political science; Library science; Scientometrics; Order (exchange); Scholarly communication; History; Media studies; Publishing; Social science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12346288512074194,"score_gpt":0.4928377733759304,"score_spread":0.36937488825518844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408386221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4604083,0.0020529237,0.0073369127,0.5042418,0.013642783,0.001213606,0.000034612207,0.000015676122,0.01105338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665666,0.00092263473,0.0004686184,0.000624933,0.000057689173,0.0000073116043,2.1220411e-7,9.745239e-7,0.0012609982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977131,0.000036212114,0.00042071764,0.00006900614,0.0016353223,0.0001256467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900906,0.0011835026,0.00067935855,0.00010997388,0.007907402,0.000029170951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036804378,0.00003299907,0.00010539113,0.009191185,0.0003036364,0.003497956,0.0010458966,0.00006863638,0.0000059859326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1087441,0.000016208682,0.0000384565,0.017523812,0.00021933309,0.0038353556,0.0002116259,0.00021057921,0.0000031401983],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000797501,0.000030232895,0.081348866,0.000007174944,0.000029187431,1.5780816e-7,0.000535626,0.000011899655,0.00012419838,0.10721818,0.03351165,0.77710307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020183248,0.00009257495,0.047457367,0.000032261356,0.000009810063,0.00002355307,0.0026338364,0.008120258,0.00037427267,0.20919956,0.72998255,0.000055613404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014397692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000083546365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77704746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020604489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031008312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399694","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0023","title":"They Rejected My Paper: Why?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.4707725526660492,"score_gpt":0.5219823587712209,"score_spread":0.051209806105171674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7229684,0.04052682,0.011899838,0.119856596,0.011668838,0.00025621796,0.00004134911,0.00013020796,0.092651725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907016,0.00061739696,0.0028297892,0.0014183548,0.0011283442,0.0000011875812,0.0000011625768,0.000022825541,0.003279328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772882,0.00053119566,0.0015818104,0.0005124141,0.01948376,0.0006026363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97090274,0.007910934,0.00065610005,0.00071837945,0.018866306,0.0009455328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104350336,0.00016047325,0.00039210092,0.08253033,0.0002952704,0.40778327,0.005857642,0.0002637289,0.0012188434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29236552,0.00009582439,0.00040962634,0.1433235,0.000069461144,0.1881438,0.00080871367,0.0032990458,0.00026205077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002972418,0.000078151024,0.028006652,0.000010352963,0.0000766792,0.00044480714,0.0005510164,0.00003101165,0.0060677608,0.005732177,0.62047505,0.3384966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000371148,0.00022397938,0.03893701,0.00010998296,0.000016134136,0.0003433898,0.00094497576,0.000923847,0.00023888098,0.06085222,0.89686525,0.00017316718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009182758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001571615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3383234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028375036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091132725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408410518","doi":"10.3390/educsci15030358","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of Romanian Educational Research in Web of Science: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Integration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Computer science; Data science; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Educational research; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Political science; MEDLINE; Psychology","score_opus":0.8196150404099736,"score_gpt":0.6613525713258969,"score_spread":0.1582624690840767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408410518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89593226,0.015518896,0.00020384992,0.014120752,0.0006599508,0.00027599157,0.000052232695,0.0000037618772,0.073232286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945766,0.0026196137,0.0012003987,0.0000354387,0.000021983335,0.000055134406,0.0000059092918,0.0000015959619,0.0014833384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910585,0.00030581505,0.0009121962,0.00080377935,0.0064791753,0.0004404949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832593,0.008007489,0.0003493819,0.00047301123,0.0077180946,0.00019272126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049849354,0.00010052217,0.00036910712,0.8173949,0.00040564156,0.00081436394,0.0021675942,0.000070923925,0.000108749846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034236792,0.00007545614,0.000101837126,0.92249924,0.0034195662,0.0011021632,0.0003383593,0.00010281934,0.0000012721008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007172621,0.00028434437,0.07952195,0.0000120805,0.000014292919,3.7066787e-8,0.00032840008,0.000011415876,0.00021117553,0.21208848,0.0011907087,0.70632994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014595884,0.00014819417,0.929632,0.000046800742,0.000020767191,4.916034e-7,0.017362908,0.0062244483,0.0002417641,0.042624407,0.0034752192,0.000077035744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027621098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058300165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85011005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022114621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008579018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408462321","doi":"10.33763/npndfi2024.04.092","title":"Theoretical basics of grant financing: concepts, components and typology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naukovi pratsi NDFI","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Business; Management science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.3931078182717049,"score_gpt":0.5693303446408561,"score_spread":0.1762225263691512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408462321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921094,0.0016530443,0.0039521437,0.0028285468,0.00073210197,0.0002595399,0.00003724717,0.000018555458,0.069424845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975715,0.00017222794,0.00079848623,0.00033385513,0.000022561806,0.0000053021486,0.000002405112,0.0000048375523,0.001088798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556386,0.00030410368,0.00063581526,0.00053665193,0.0025517745,0.0004077676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926334,0.0052414825,0.00016298919,0.0005443923,0.0012393384,0.00017841018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086071575,0.00012383169,0.0003969972,0.013195776,0.00015332048,0.00030946705,0.0011144538,0.00016709387,0.0005365503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022151317,0.000085328116,0.00008765524,0.04562178,0.0012756424,0.00015675536,0.0007110228,0.00026299342,0.000059539012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006409297,0.0001312822,0.07331102,0.0000127369785,0.000017207267,0.000010623434,0.0001288743,0.0000030200115,0.003000553,0.86906916,0.007168485,0.047082957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020317063,0.00049961964,0.54237247,0.000047289155,0.000026323278,0.000015689504,0.0008726062,0.0068809404,0.010236181,0.34943599,0.0872673,0.00031389852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042752396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004259377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034748653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021413992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408662333","doi":"10.63485/ehewr-d9m21","title":"U. Montréal opens its theses","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.7542654528242381,"score_gpt":0.6089285065486577,"score_spread":0.14533694627558036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408662333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054696348,0.064131744,0.014113222,0.042253472,0.0061912886,0.0016551086,0.00028852493,0.00012849426,0.8165418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48348808,0.02614302,0.010652089,0.0013965146,0.0006635983,0.000034414028,0.000018592866,0.0000401485,0.47756353],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726014,0.0008824461,0.0018234251,0.0026307115,0.020113112,0.0019488699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978932,0.008157856,0.0005913007,0.0025984875,0.008005447,0.0017148689],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034413923,0.00068969425,0.0012057055,0.08855397,0.00063141284,0.013983597,0.010726485,0.00096870994,0.021310935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05370458,0.00046858314,0.0008050692,0.22794594,0.000359756,0.0010091873,0.008598944,0.0017461029,0.036309194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035737146,0.0005775527,0.0030853879,0.000017974391,0.000058334106,0.00014980292,0.0001427661,0.0008109295,0.00022512916,0.08982825,0.1368618,0.7682063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004618486,0.00038395677,0.06579453,0.000082860475,0.000026819998,0.000037979793,0.00044904297,0.028247625,0.0013897521,0.062674545,0.8396458,0.0008052058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041504195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042634207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043696346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012756644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408745160","doi":"10.63485/qdgdv-ntk76","title":"More on removing price and permission barriers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5993575303160726,"score_gpt":0.5899067655527499,"score_spread":0.009450764763322739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408745160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8224334,0.0011872803,0.0025898423,0.003742458,0.0011645267,0.00049787905,0.00003721559,0.00008096507,0.16826643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551263,0.004080918,0.003597187,0.00075583154,0.0001789203,0.000012056796,0.0000065559225,0.000026843547,0.03621541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848735,0.00021951275,0.0006922875,0.0016334465,0.011986167,0.0005951004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913977,0.0037802255,0.00029790265,0.0014457909,0.0018253698,0.001253025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012273083,0.00028912385,0.00048116446,0.06675133,0.00046665757,0.0028980924,0.002625301,0.0004333426,0.0014423655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07187812,0.00017898352,0.00018686497,0.07064594,0.00025145934,0.00022068237,0.004821857,0.001031876,0.00021524311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009715705,0.0001472208,0.07238556,0.000058620062,0.000045327604,0.00029830736,0.0015472212,0.00090433116,0.00054882537,0.0011921923,0.34273645,0.5800388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012896337,0.0005526197,0.3449798,0.00026208183,0.000019110163,0.00015213144,0.0036050917,0.15376364,0.0022384953,0.026887706,0.46424663,0.0020030662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011776416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017401067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5780357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015955725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005730608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408767301","doi":"10.63485/r37yc-0e563","title":"OA publishing, with a focus on British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Focus (optics); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.5017725558512895,"score_gpt":0.5057943518032549,"score_spread":0.00402179595196539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408767301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4106624,0.00082124665,0.0037151854,0.0032173914,0.0014771146,0.0009947418,0.00033288824,0.00019113692,0.5785879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852916,0.0013000692,0.0035298667,0.00067733723,0.00031093587,0.00007653238,0.000029395736,0.000045978788,0.10873831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97047186,0.00030323205,0.000958366,0.0023288354,0.024929304,0.001008425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98546284,0.0038686546,0.0005364804,0.00230565,0.0068956446,0.0009307187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016677475,0.00026507568,0.00075077586,0.04413253,0.0004984228,0.13652578,0.007985989,0.00063406036,0.0066682324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049597256,0.00025324593,0.00031709313,0.17055708,0.00035534808,0.0011868597,0.00514174,0.0019761254,0.0007473813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010345267,0.00017136094,0.057679452,0.0000041770827,0.000022003069,0.00026240753,0.000023269351,0.000056390294,7.0269294e-7,0.00006792146,0.66006494,0.281637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017503124,0.0011047289,0.4758538,0.0001787575,0.000016640859,0.00034276771,0.00026681228,0.004834334,0.00006286062,0.084357694,0.42975596,0.0014753231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113479935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0746688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47462916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002667793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010606805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408844348","doi":"10.63485/r6x49-hrg46","title":"Canadian funding agency launches an OA repository","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Business; Funding Agency; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.7355679784450803,"score_gpt":0.5987643766690417,"score_spread":0.13680360177603856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408844348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45140988,0.0016103372,0.0057836147,0.0008058281,0.0055081295,0.00046921487,0.00006910462,0.00009742842,0.53424644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94375384,0.00011426209,0.0036058978,0.00031368242,0.0005400044,0.000012146324,0.000025395218,0.000026931739,0.051607825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828796,0.0003456185,0.0012369024,0.0019511165,0.012102611,0.0014841554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98759264,0.0023392304,0.00038505744,0.002683728,0.003867722,0.0031316422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04465757,0.00034019054,0.00053056376,0.1813021,0.0006407517,0.00967234,0.0070708594,0.00074627035,0.003181245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01843326,0.00024982507,0.00031695876,0.12799366,0.00015114147,0.0005569013,0.0027168235,0.0012222884,0.00088958413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001654797,0.00020543246,0.39440852,0.000031516403,0.00006931708,0.00080030697,0.00081260747,0.00023986337,0.0005680857,0.0043929694,0.10697757,0.49147725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034751632,0.00026857556,0.6534308,0.00005003271,0.000027701186,0.00006301097,0.0016659843,0.018585179,0.0025483083,0.07123004,0.2500602,0.001722654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31882718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13866356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.492344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012853992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028781467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409093390","doi":"10.2196/72998","title":"Citation Accuracy Challenges Posed by Large Language Models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Natural language processing; Library science","score_opus":0.32946776814999285,"score_gpt":0.60707918867813,"score_spread":0.2776114205281372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409093390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7020292,0.027202545,0.026080985,0.11409492,0.0035568816,0.001120283,0.000046388806,0.00013415354,0.12573461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878913,0.0010338059,0.00027939808,0.0021055383,0.00012991241,0.00010189464,0.000043921194,0.000006094242,0.008408145],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919006,0.0002439303,0.0004888201,0.00051453715,0.006485151,0.00036694438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455404,0.0030120583,0.0001412355,0.0005327978,0.0013425272,0.00041731563],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010291723,0.00010095627,0.00017712516,0.016155323,0.00015385798,0.0005943072,0.0013598168,0.00019284085,0.0015635025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06933685,0.000073342395,0.0000730652,0.048962064,0.00006758771,0.000612413,0.00022885895,0.00027125498,0.00028498608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083428085,0.00060365297,0.00052684685,0.000012385746,0.000005900094,8.560449e-7,0.0013121652,6.15614e-7,0.00021429396,0.015721694,0.31370693,0.6678863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020677096,0.00015818841,0.07155684,0.00016149193,0.000014227247,0.000005009521,0.028392047,0.086121425,0.0007013284,0.16834423,0.6419815,0.0004960135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054024476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020990212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6673903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010900985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014620482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409117945","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2488948","title":"Response to “Frontiers in bibliometric analysis: the overrepresentation of bibliometric analyses in grey publisher journals”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Bibliometrics; Grey literature; Library science; MEDLINE; Computer science","score_opus":0.7187109624252355,"score_gpt":0.6964715231902021,"score_spread":0.022239439235033354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409117945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012479,0.072656296,0.010742339,0.012184943,0.0017130851,0.0006814641,0.000016898437,0.000008294115,0.00074874755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791311,0.02030003,0.00012211535,0.00007394885,0.000057454326,0.000050962604,0.0000071255845,0.000006048538,0.0002512197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634696,0.0044735535,0.002045636,0.0012057532,0.027502347,0.0013031098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94667333,0.041962866,0.00036355297,0.0014363538,0.007966549,0.0015973322],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14779484,0.0001732923,0.00070584717,0.97614175,0.00022499148,0.0028013638,0.003361363,0.00020539071,0.0003499509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46284467,0.000103288185,0.00020699674,0.9932336,0.0005523335,0.000996425,0.0016634244,0.0013397634,0.000017686903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040199797,0.00025912185,0.5454539,0.0000146282955,0.00004187666,0.0000053842336,0.00006647569,0.000043818753,0.000042064505,0.000060130886,0.049977258,0.40363336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083840336,0.00019278491,0.9642307,0.00012709289,0.000009343567,8.2256685e-7,0.0008681316,0.00834281,0.0000520014,0.005376117,0.019867968,0.00009383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007648334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001471547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023357008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00113987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409158554","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05296-0","title":"Examining the role of co-first authorship in scientific collaboration: a quantitative study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Sociology; Data science; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6419803795842838,"score_gpt":0.6109582313954125,"score_spread":0.03102214818887128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409158554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737291,0.002277418,0.0010200188,0.000552004,0.0015757377,0.0010741974,0.00004569259,0.00002183709,0.019704027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959499,0.000021306492,0.00060180295,0.00003518371,0.000016835727,0.000044809814,0.0000030720735,0.000007961398,0.0033191284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786101,0.001037848,0.0015672792,0.0014062485,0.016488777,0.0008897453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96724516,0.02040634,0.00065889966,0.0019897446,0.009360002,0.0003398561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11787893,0.0002090679,0.0005021271,0.25902575,0.0010153905,0.006315107,0.005061687,0.00012747665,0.00016184636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18387233,0.00013298022,0.0001060675,0.8153915,0.0010143381,0.0008863263,0.0010929861,0.0004463833,0.00014228036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033593085,0.00070548547,0.95565206,0.000006278547,0.000015839103,0.000005232169,0.0058157467,0.0002897301,0.0004416861,0.011862708,0.002773428,0.022398202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009462487,0.00050375727,0.86705846,0.000025755513,0.000012378182,8.3037054e-7,0.07146922,0.012080025,0.0019118444,0.015516148,0.030259809,0.00021554019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016020647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006408005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5563657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032068003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010832623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409213925","doi":"10.1080/03155986.2025.2485795","title":"Dynamic analysis of the time-dependent progress of h-index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2568807318774551,"score_gpt":0.5561487956127815,"score_spread":0.29926806373532644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409213925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305727,0.0011665268,0.012516682,0.0020533025,0.00053934165,0.001903833,0.000511884,0.000013524774,0.050722245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545425,0.000036447993,0.00004861374,0.000032440996,0.0000051180327,0.000036457852,0.000016663718,0.0000014134462,0.004368564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851204,0.00028806014,0.0012718943,0.00016757377,0.009510704,0.00024970534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863609,0.0023654934,0.00028465738,0.000532064,0.010368261,0.00008860974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02697964,0.0000740358,0.0002993559,0.039272014,0.00033065453,0.0015135399,0.0012225558,0.000094763265,0.00011475575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010213248,0.000041134634,0.00011967195,0.107039586,0.00036635395,0.0012331869,0.00066111726,0.00019667468,0.000040744875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015271503,0.00014855775,0.710974,0.00020522632,0.0008071739,4.636099e-7,0.0014258632,0.033750854,0.0005952657,0.12569605,0.0089852065,0.11725862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031747203,0.0000470895,0.37441918,0.000029799607,0.000016170772,9.577146e-7,0.0012518741,0.6018962,0.00029393416,0.00032818096,0.02134101,0.000058075562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002806004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025988225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5681454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009182444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061977905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999523},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4409399271","doi":"10.1007/s42535-025-01251-9","title":"Comparative study of trends in photosynthetic metabolism knowledge between Brazil and the United States","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vegetos","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Photosynthesis; Biology; Veterinary medicine; Botany; Medicine","score_opus":0.40615825487403984,"score_gpt":0.5747577964994507,"score_spread":0.16859954162541085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409399271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99135655,0.001295491,0.000096420656,0.00049590186,0.00011343538,0.00033992034,0.000020622669,0.000007402599,0.006274277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979294,0.000059118564,0.000019772382,0.000032079864,0.000011530752,0.000020558782,0.0000040555933,0.0000032973508,0.0019201721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957507,0.0009285187,0.0006657071,0.00042351353,0.0019459903,0.00028555063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898016,0.00856297,0.0001527637,0.00051897444,0.00086887536,0.00009483],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010974749,0.00012258807,0.0005899252,0.06797131,0.00014306797,0.0004393101,0.0012663235,0.000050385926,0.00008897373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021424976,0.00006431547,0.000063589236,0.21297897,0.00040843477,0.00013425536,0.0006127522,0.00022932347,0.000017747287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053547707,0.0032758699,0.65404844,0.00002415727,0.00041929647,0.000010874357,0.07363334,0.0004864911,0.00043828913,0.009269014,0.016284712,0.24157402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004886933,0.00015012066,0.9352898,0.000013724914,0.000037731283,3.9276236e-7,0.014347339,0.01325534,0.0017520365,0.008493978,0.021640461,0.00013217192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009682687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048151778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28124133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024456485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005956631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94259244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409428864","doi":"10.1177/23780231251328714","title":"From Funding Equity Initiatives to Research Productivity: Quantifying the Impact of NSF ADVANCE Awards on Recipients’ Publication Trajectories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Productivity; Political science; Economics; Regional science; Public economics; Economic growth; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.8732843629579464,"score_gpt":0.7383037569837724,"score_spread":0.13498060597417405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409428864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95667505,0.0006241946,0.006834488,0.018318566,0.0004951605,0.002812258,0.0007454633,0.00006283221,0.013431984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295926,0.00013950802,0.00083965185,0.00007724882,0.00019572796,0.0006428805,0.00005170461,0.000017629513,0.005076414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792686,0.004795567,0.0010552963,0.0017596517,0.010967207,0.0021536408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8649366,0.11603235,0.00031084736,0.0018296317,0.016343445,0.0005471619],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13297524,0.00026249056,0.00067786005,0.027744042,0.0024284234,0.0017565078,0.0044964897,0.0002567863,0.0003742759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40444365,0.00014471525,0.000638525,0.14855032,0.0025127786,0.00068928854,0.0029581478,0.0022034985,0.0000845136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028551824,0.002606018,0.27413362,0.0000925112,0.00058081705,0.0000073473716,0.006788962,0.00060022034,0.013468341,0.18211716,0.13332671,0.3834231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048808794,0.0013706826,0.5467923,0.00009311754,0.000005506718,1.7538933e-7,0.0042805304,0.004362298,0.0005479893,0.4346379,0.0072109196,0.00021044379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000697616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028142266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38321266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024342476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014664418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409573174","doi":"10.63485/js7m1-67p26","title":"Canadian funding alliance provides OA to the research it funds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.855765589726267,"score_gpt":0.6476407285586211,"score_spread":0.20812486116764595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409573174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072657555,0.002854379,0.007509389,0.2783465,0.0044123027,0.003956854,0.00046208184,0.0000948822,0.6297061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74906546,0.00017754833,0.0026459857,0.0017178435,0.00073651416,0.00023106647,0.000019407527,0.00003696036,0.2453692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96693337,0.0010949521,0.0012176428,0.0024115401,0.025510984,0.0028315007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724494,0.01107777,0.00022017056,0.0037258558,0.010262201,0.0022645623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12022379,0.00036193756,0.00054137746,0.120218374,0.0015902591,0.022223484,0.016034294,0.000507147,0.002860476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07715214,0.00020411728,0.00029721984,0.28595436,0.0003054964,0.00033519327,0.008971414,0.0025615613,0.006918265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006385388,0.000030487936,0.022307113,0.000010781474,0.000012647373,0.000037887577,0.00014426446,0.0007615668,0.000014766861,0.0014432822,0.88654345,0.08868739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007546071,0.00007477603,0.03895403,0.000036124413,0.0000028999157,0.0000037339482,0.00060855824,0.0070128525,0.000074567826,0.01699382,0.9358292,0.0003339376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52109605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69324714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67640793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002125239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047706007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409600482","doi":"10.63485/zh50g-pzr25","title":"Michael Geist calls on Canadian government to mandate OA to publicly-funded research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Geist; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7236919819231086,"score_gpt":0.6122221483126473,"score_spread":0.11146983361046126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409600482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34364572,0.00014106934,0.005288851,0.07834146,0.0029478003,0.0036220453,0.0023847818,0.000078945755,0.56354934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79908407,0.000038374277,0.0040736175,0.004321645,0.00043441472,0.00025134612,0.000052880594,0.000060086004,0.19168358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94749856,0.00077043707,0.0014229995,0.0035368316,0.04368778,0.0030834079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97575843,0.0062061776,0.00020100454,0.0042293034,0.0075632227,0.0060418295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06745555,0.00052734034,0.00082004373,0.15031885,0.0007980203,0.01774179,0.011781008,0.00062804244,0.0042424873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06276622,0.00039097542,0.00032067727,0.2079798,0.00018054439,0.0002470219,0.011088071,0.0020655787,0.014334636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050158666,0.0001842796,0.015598258,0.000010146691,0.000024154868,0.00010450914,0.00008190441,0.0010435054,0.0000707967,0.0033264244,0.89161485,0.08789101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028755603,0.0004205378,0.08555734,0.000041504925,0.000003678095,0.000002287092,0.00027161842,0.0019074449,0.00087448256,0.007807329,0.90215343,0.0006728118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66895896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71422184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45543835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058214036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020774947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409618730","doi":"10.63485/vnghy-msg64","title":"Public support for OA journals in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8677978172402238,"score_gpt":0.6266668301252222,"score_spread":0.24113098711500158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409618730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44276738,0.006655216,0.057078816,0.10641037,0.013876956,0.0048020086,0.0018502038,0.00007995027,0.3664791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741887,0.0004550442,0.0038416726,0.0009862593,0.00030883958,0.00007585151,0.000021693764,0.000018710474,0.020103272],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077404,0.0001816334,0.0017135466,0.0011911322,0.014945375,0.0011942886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851744,0.006083892,0.0005491103,0.0012732354,0.0060009975,0.0009183719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043150574,0.00024291624,0.00068323594,0.11806163,0.00012559851,0.006415926,0.006279426,0.00026242,0.012345068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062544055,0.00016579819,0.0002598024,0.12944409,0.000047826637,0.0004158714,0.0031244392,0.0009064959,0.00013735278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007536769,0.0000697879,0.17393433,0.000009490008,0.000015610061,0.000024696961,0.00001688013,0.0003959166,0.000009487707,0.00042538834,0.40387937,0.4212115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071575923,0.00006168917,0.22397225,0.000016348531,0.0000044848425,0.000012794514,0.0003729368,0.02974487,0.00017359646,0.029706135,0.71465486,0.0005642591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67594695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5314213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019679298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018199924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409636982","doi":"10.63485/ta5sg-hrm45","title":"CISTI considers OA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.8537970487704313,"score_gpt":0.6650593612996738,"score_spread":0.18873768747075748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409636982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067412026,0.00303433,0.04054868,0.016541716,0.0048813913,0.0008041431,0.00016562303,0.00019736895,0.8664147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291874,0.00041467836,0.010993897,0.0013268309,0.00045392613,0.000020675321,0.000013072119,0.000021977356,0.05756754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798105,0.00024721638,0.0011271047,0.0016370757,0.016403405,0.0007746994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852267,0.0067547876,0.00040392266,0.0022911273,0.0046014627,0.0007219883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026061883,0.0002888673,0.0006023357,0.10925393,0.00018145554,0.007401905,0.0056788693,0.00048136504,0.018394925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06711974,0.00019052587,0.0004031593,0.12527943,0.00029288314,0.0002400178,0.0073393057,0.0010679644,0.0067742094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072217967,0.000095370815,0.012883097,0.000006263174,0.000026653077,0.000031233954,0.000051486328,0.00049770536,0.000032976044,0.0034826938,0.6621605,0.3207248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004639321,0.00006931849,0.02899522,0.000016539136,0.0000137550005,0.000015795442,0.0003494001,0.026631566,0.0006100154,0.19899186,0.74307084,0.00077173143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002314677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007215422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019625857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007277087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409656814","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/y569z_v1","title":"Investigating journal peer review as scientific object of study: unabridged version – Part II","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Preprint; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7596824354113867,"score_gpt":0.6267780326723678,"score_spread":0.13290440273901893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409656814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931938,0.01330795,0.00009989532,0.007911642,0.008452264,0.0015505713,0.000093894065,0.000032270767,0.03661352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464041,0.0050687287,0.0013416014,0.00026846753,0.00032369193,0.000024929037,0.000035906625,0.000031830237,0.14650078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9408192,0.0012101021,0.002513253,0.001881797,0.05272875,0.0008468965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337852,0.0034374539,0.004383105,0.0054101455,0.051632885,0.0013512304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22268511,0.00037734612,0.0012962845,0.056092687,0.0031564853,0.014840235,0.010981434,0.0002691415,0.0035633396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4197686,0.00024204454,0.00065937877,0.07487145,0.0008009591,0.0007793856,0.014715811,0.0018815516,0.000684516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007104329,0.00039230948,0.033542465,0.00018995962,0.0000673162,0.0000344873,0.0003766588,0.00003705601,0.0001222998,0.00008393769,0.8962005,0.06894593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019016844,0.0016460076,0.074447565,0.0057743522,0.0002447726,0.000101573496,0.0022447447,0.0020164845,0.0021379765,0.05828425,0.8498368,0.0013637537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029695043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002870486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1970835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021483717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031829327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409669833","doi":"10.63485/7e4vb-kvz05","title":"For this journal, OA increases submissions, quality, and impact factor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Quality (philosophy); Factor (programming language); Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8529167592658652,"score_gpt":0.6948283942763875,"score_spread":0.15808836498947765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409669833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9500261,0.01175605,0.019473555,0.0062193917,0.000980963,0.0011150438,0.001329796,0.000064384796,0.009034726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96099573,0.006778794,0.010365187,0.00046218294,0.0008244172,0.000028621402,0.000024898898,0.000035795623,0.020484352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985486,0.0005814454,0.0016246194,0.0011854458,0.010253126,0.0008693892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737499,0.016561802,0.0009122514,0.0011700452,0.0058567515,0.0017492818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03867535,0.0003853733,0.0009127556,0.06921115,0.0005699737,0.01342097,0.003680672,0.0005101418,0.010851779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11264735,0.00021025054,0.00073864637,0.04106987,0.00017657319,0.00058538374,0.0043826965,0.0010458049,0.00013977646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007668849,0.0002703616,0.14640404,0.000030476695,0.000089405985,0.0000069236166,0.00008825468,0.000027556858,0.0001876647,0.00027709067,0.34668213,0.50585943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001508125,0.0005310384,0.665017,0.000082500395,0.000038627535,0.00009979035,0.00048254197,0.00834716,0.00043052324,0.07897037,0.2433629,0.0011294177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010250561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046022767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.518613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030042024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011844119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99005246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409678250","doi":"10.63485/3skzc-yna41","title":"Canadian strategy for research and scholarly communication","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.9262295703845984,"score_gpt":0.7044177162853287,"score_spread":0.22181185409926973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409678250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58979654,0.021651074,0.0049171336,0.054642756,0.00073106255,0.0043526283,0.00090561685,0.00007424164,0.32292894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515179,0.0018774723,0.007637694,0.00014538514,0.0001328227,0.00011968197,0.000049958013,0.000017475975,0.038501624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98833066,0.00052374386,0.0007095804,0.001131852,0.008290752,0.0010133844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721501,0.008616528,0.0001469019,0.0022243364,0.015576887,0.0012852326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08803095,0.00016904282,0.0003318668,0.122496314,0.0009273002,0.03227198,0.006061476,0.0005475972,0.00072517665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045273058,0.00012631084,0.00009654597,0.075919315,0.00030486513,0.0010805989,0.0037648247,0.0018076862,0.0002414298],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016125832,0.00008933369,0.022382984,0.000016307173,0.000027044309,0.0000029569344,0.00026818304,0.0001530847,0.000039263257,0.034905516,0.22211796,0.71998125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040370759,0.00023219048,0.07153236,0.000028427068,0.000004180256,0.000003728137,0.0011983931,0.012857356,0.00011891539,0.48962635,0.42363408,0.00036030996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20768444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3497454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71962094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073065487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032575529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409728141","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22390","title":"Towards Sustainable and Coordinated Methods for Estimating Open Access Costs at Canadian Higher Education Institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental economics; Higher education; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.354533325933165,"score_gpt":0.5916812547562789,"score_spread":0.23714792882311386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409728141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19362408,0.0038890508,0.12508462,0.085023195,0.0069793854,0.002560486,0.00020240877,0.000021174626,0.5826156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8996482,0.000050003666,0.0854501,0.004717996,0.000037573947,0.000014422666,0.000011429781,0.0000034466955,0.010066854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982086,0.00006733631,0.0005585899,0.00015846184,0.00057595206,0.00043109216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477494,0.00048444438,0.000292294,0.00018040411,0.0025563594,0.001711537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494694,0.00007753376,0.000161258,0.040606193,0.0016601903,0.020929761,0.0029339592,0.00005433787,0.00026693047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014024946,0.000058923015,0.000026713036,0.055569842,0.00043741643,0.027289229,0.0006101858,0.0001241365,0.0000030692931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010296631,0.0000051991474,0.021980844,0.000019599962,0.000005287919,0.0000024598014,0.000255452,0.00010119572,0.0000077408395,0.22137366,0.07058112,0.68565714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029486822,0.000048325648,0.11048402,0.000037810318,0.0000042031247,0.000028891996,0.0009757962,0.01026248,0.00012960623,0.016093694,0.8615426,0.000097709075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06665031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009360983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005924775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041599613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996395},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4409733993","doi":"10.63485/b43hh-rtn68","title":"OA to Canadian social science and humanities research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Digital humanities; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.9027202693128655,"score_gpt":0.6846050831972839,"score_spread":0.21811518611558167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409733993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19721523,0.00042233051,0.000360081,0.017159134,0.0013470768,0.0010375392,0.00015619297,0.00004081246,0.7822616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98533773,0.000052754527,0.00066129974,0.0010660057,0.00028759753,0.0000418144,0.0000023722528,0.000015435347,0.012534958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612563,0.00027368296,0.00063196116,0.0019958555,0.033852763,0.0019894391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655215,0.0020017626,0.000095455514,0.0011461489,0.029251132,0.0019840074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11421211,0.00022770368,0.00041771473,0.31257245,0.0029707837,0.024832962,0.008379041,0.00031675032,0.001167394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09368266,0.00017094196,0.000086206,0.2859124,0.0025323236,0.00047746953,0.01166209,0.0014698828,0.0010357798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021087393,0.0001245071,0.011565895,0.00005217541,0.000023934874,0.00012763723,0.005972888,0.000059383245,0.0004538601,0.30843624,0.36600313,0.30715927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003423064,0.00027213953,0.13351396,0.0000455625,0.0000047493227,0.000011176002,0.0076452545,0.0007046964,0.0007317709,0.30907345,0.54675317,0.0009017611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24423127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12629575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78812253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003271625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015197838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409741111","doi":"10.20397/2177-6652/2023.v23i2.2616","title":"Nobel Prize in Economics: retrospectove analysis and prediction of laureates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Gestão & Tecnologia","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; University of California, Santa Barbara; Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University; Toulouse School of Economics; London School of Economics and Political Science; Northwestern University; York University; University of Pennsylvania; Universitetet i Oslo; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Minnesota; Princeton University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Yale University","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics","score_opus":0.37584639152506316,"score_gpt":0.49309913823988977,"score_spread":0.1172527467148266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409741111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99712205,0.0008876361,0.0003182962,0.00039607016,0.000067938934,0.00018925901,0.00011470404,0.000051805022,0.00085225096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945436,0.004387894,0.00035929342,0.000014162601,0.000019659969,0.000009544895,0.000014625459,0.0000067889982,0.0006444439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657464,0.0001383846,0.00082413293,0.00070763956,0.0013475068,0.00040768538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963343,0.001943489,0.00030195198,0.00072000653,0.00056689844,0.00013335794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104213925,0.00012808836,0.0005543503,0.055105068,0.00007242345,0.0006691288,0.00093033246,0.00015664952,0.00013246642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015844896,0.000093071336,0.0001523338,0.18454823,0.00020278698,0.00027721177,0.0005103883,0.00020866687,0.000094573275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001008656,0.000028577775,0.96318984,0.000007397793,0.00004860107,0.000006790249,0.000036592766,0.000064244305,0.0007775566,0.0010673889,0.00071431027,0.03404861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022159297,0.000116243755,0.98581785,0.000007752098,0.000027801534,0.0000016399665,0.00012354105,0.008225684,0.00055286183,0.002607847,0.0022150236,0.000082169616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016616863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056026405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12944315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010207812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006642508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99244505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409755532","doi":"10.63485/ecj3v-69f70","title":"Canadian funder discriminates against OA journals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.7604873810842887,"score_gpt":0.6139564019016527,"score_spread":0.14653097918263602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409755532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24414846,0.0093992995,0.017529346,0.041179404,0.0074517066,0.0012077034,0.00059150346,0.00011937549,0.6783732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743242,0.0010770126,0.001251866,0.0012879843,0.00025880933,0.000016854945,0.000026090562,0.000028910297,0.021728259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811623,0.00025702384,0.0013112532,0.0015379032,0.014237302,0.0014942334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733443,0.0020154538,0.00044428866,0.0019019187,0.0055089574,0.002794923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026123043,0.00039712433,0.00069803064,0.18670397,0.0005013862,0.01706733,0.007552338,0.0006341018,0.008492904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03074917,0.00025611187,0.0005071944,0.12911735,0.00018065529,0.00047109736,0.003753104,0.0016186225,0.0025156196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015117592,0.00030029655,0.10207149,0.00005721316,0.00017786388,0.00058705354,0.000593533,0.009429962,0.00017742757,0.0068298043,0.2792771,0.6004832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074561057,0.00011424151,0.21940425,0.00017594176,0.00003084444,0.000031846634,0.0020939703,0.008457866,0.00074657716,0.63154125,0.13495685,0.0017007515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19117248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17323717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73017573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019016853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054641636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409912679","doi":"10.1098/rsos.240857","title":"Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Society Open Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Openness to experience; Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Ethos; Equity (law); Political science; Public policy; Science policy; Open science; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.3359765003308867,"score_gpt":0.6180077266880395,"score_spread":0.2820312263571528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409912679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95366204,0.0001810167,0.0010649617,0.009391448,0.00023904679,0.001028144,0.0000118018415,0.000010462751,0.03441111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436206,0.00019465691,0.0017470097,0.0020266955,0.000033202854,0.00006440726,8.372703e-7,0.0000053660024,0.0015657492],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98846227,0.00046256572,0.0007017952,0.0017939897,0.007081799,0.0014975733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928499,0.0018875556,0.00031169786,0.0011449787,0.0030826656,0.00072321796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11282765,0.00017962912,0.00039731548,0.0058943834,0.004490667,0.04906435,0.018838493,0.0000619434,0.000049680475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0644308,0.00010765649,0.000038494054,0.24454923,0.009819855,0.006694152,0.049590588,0.00032802785,0.000014477336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005709914,0.00023540718,0.31244734,0.000005177899,0.000009480303,0.0000034865022,0.012811306,0.000110287096,0.0007868477,0.032277845,0.0015110392,0.6397447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019187176,0.00015577264,0.8958852,0.000017434588,0.0000033459035,0.0000021533733,0.012942603,0.073874906,0.0002568165,0.0095821265,0.005146863,0.00021403468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010294846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026011968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63953066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041139234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040828427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680537},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4410024879","doi":"10.55016/pbgrc.v1i1.81424","title":"Publication Chair’s Editorial - Insights and Innovations: An Array of Scholarly Advancements Emerging from the University of Calgary","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peer Beyond Graduate Research Conference","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5282680111901159,"score_gpt":0.5368554082654491,"score_spread":0.00858739707533318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410024879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93373334,0.0012503254,0.02927554,0.019235402,0.0035511102,0.0010002538,0.0001720978,0.000021984953,0.011759915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962975,0.0006609069,0.0009350244,0.000030047808,0.0002733277,0.0000056342283,0.000048777965,0.0000040630234,0.00174474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872187,0.0008152245,0.00054683513,0.0006077706,0.010445453,0.0003660594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500667,0.0048092417,0.0002824172,0.0010491458,0.04357669,0.00021584336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022905579,0.00009949672,0.00024381452,0.0140031865,0.00059267145,0.0015917148,0.0024549693,0.00010397486,0.0001581773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05132763,0.00007029172,0.000041295127,0.07303004,0.00063892757,0.002454127,0.00087109505,0.00065666967,0.000016624093],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031228265,0.00058985426,0.104964025,0.00005596463,0.000113299255,0.0000037493833,0.0046233353,0.000007268221,0.04543908,0.12655279,0.108692445,0.6086459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020129322,0.00043877147,0.4385001,0.00022210664,0.000018480989,4.1548805e-7,0.0086769415,0.007661537,0.009968696,0.33139077,0.20079795,0.0003112831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022918254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033932785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6083346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072052775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010722318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410043481","doi":"10.1080/1941126x.2025.2497727","title":"Are most FT50 journals truly “suspected predatory”, or has an AI-driven “predatory” journal detector erred in its classification?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ecology; Data science; Biology","score_opus":0.520105489641718,"score_gpt":0.5217428154380026,"score_spread":0.0016373257962846166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410043481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661118,0.011203298,0.0032687092,0.016304523,0.00094272196,0.0004910642,0.000046605823,0.00004106789,0.0015902108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99148154,0.0008206103,0.0004050647,0.0007467567,0.0007180086,0.000009656519,0.0000021378276,0.000049489205,0.005766734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813047,0.003309317,0.003854012,0.0009082774,0.008836231,0.0017874866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98248917,0.005377695,0.0043710913,0.0011994092,0.0052234526,0.0013391937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031029316,0.00048680024,0.0012641794,0.06561824,0.0008660816,0.014779538,0.0077301017,0.0005480881,0.00210071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057424646,0.00032674128,0.00050327886,0.108627245,0.00027915608,0.006029723,0.00045087788,0.0041420027,0.0000516977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006616837,0.002551782,0.71657604,0.00008667865,0.0008767695,0.0016168519,0.0024810063,0.003449468,0.016757043,0.0036141714,0.13988733,0.105486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004414486,0.0014111793,0.63328093,0.00033231018,0.000065618384,0.00078976084,0.0030146635,0.009433902,0.0017095552,0.020606197,0.32437626,0.0005651629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010541017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019394954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18448892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015654481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005765251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410122176","doi":"10.1629/uksg.677","title":"Barriers and benefits of transitioning to an equitable open access model: interviews with LIS journal editors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights the UKSG journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Open access journal; Library science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; MEDLINE; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5755927797252935,"score_gpt":0.5852753503797516,"score_spread":0.0096825706544581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410122176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040689,0.0023370695,0.08099968,0.005852968,0.0017368624,0.00033127234,0.000016304517,0.000005800117,0.00465118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958501,0.0006337404,0.0018430884,0.00057751406,0.0004742216,0.0000055198066,3.8277787e-7,0.000010470652,0.00060497795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938621,0.00045251366,0.00087298657,0.00036657407,0.003952669,0.00049316074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357057,0.0009875351,0.00040786897,0.00048537855,0.0037088697,0.00083977013],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019762257,0.00015836612,0.0003943546,0.0234571,0.0014831093,0.021086445,0.0072368486,0.000073394884,0.00019464167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445557,0.00007275028,0.00009661685,0.05776589,0.00017260153,0.0050222576,0.001763119,0.0006524035,0.0000038902203],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011947625,0.00042198846,0.026833078,0.00003860075,0.00044033903,0.00012494824,0.027268074,0.14559053,0.0019775,0.012328058,0.23176585,0.55201626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009694337,0.005858203,0.066016525,0.0030154376,0.00031428022,0.0023794088,0.024235925,0.18352182,0.015979042,0.4953667,0.19180854,0.0018097961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006441588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011273705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5502065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093971736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073995854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410500507","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162577.1","title":"“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Openness to experience; Open science; Scope (computer science); Incentive; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Equity (law); Political science; Public relations; Open data; Publishing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Psychology; Economics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7318407363937084,"score_gpt":0.617907542556378,"score_spread":0.11393319383733036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410500507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06963344,0.002233085,0.00094349915,0.83780897,0.0014059261,0.0060909283,0.00037988892,0.000034990222,0.08146928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535759,0.0024473066,0.0014842965,0.008163254,0.00015107161,0.000727899,0.00002547872,0.000030901545,0.03339388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597909,0.0038375622,0.0012415616,0.003280939,0.029498471,0.0023505667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94477993,0.03474274,0.00053292,0.005910242,0.013035571,0.0009985705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1988481,0.00049220084,0.00079827284,0.0673039,0.0031102407,0.070889786,0.060164753,0.00040305537,0.00064521364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19202036,0.00023938359,0.00019298558,0.22654001,0.0046081906,0.0013423006,0.070588395,0.0039586495,0.00020146645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003011995,0.00045256325,0.053294588,0.00014783978,0.000086410844,0.00041360976,0.011103521,0.0002669459,0.0006778537,0.00818303,0.6789321,0.24614036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001141998,0.00022431121,0.35037217,0.00019704693,0.00001555214,0.000032816126,0.0108507,0.013828349,0.00062908675,0.030190937,0.59179515,0.0007219011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034297872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023503287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006322489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018295296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410609573","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0313972","title":"Canadian natural science graduate stipends lie below the poverty line","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan; Ocean Networks Canada Society; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Stipend; Poverty; Graduate education; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.6116825791435256,"score_gpt":0.5139824557776801,"score_spread":0.09770012336584555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410609573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8919542,0.0012673559,0.00012826704,0.04916406,0.00084689684,0.00040947998,0.00006109029,0.000036433627,0.05613225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699113,0.00012440656,0.0005383397,0.0024226983,0.00006940247,0.000010318505,0.000002487108,0.000005174023,0.026915897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868113,0.00011038197,0.00042657784,0.00071660546,0.010995839,0.0009393443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913405,0.0024702607,0.00009857134,0.0011558225,0.0043278257,0.0006069927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017751414,0.00013229619,0.00024598293,0.04939417,0.0011884398,0.0034986136,0.0051819747,0.000059421007,0.0004139306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05660711,0.0000722091,0.00008083874,0.27411628,0.00051186816,0.0005789552,0.00088258163,0.0005181423,0.0006893466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008115517,0.0020458193,0.2430422,0.000037576443,0.00028231894,0.00008957434,0.0005200419,0.000046509376,0.032930944,0.028818224,0.21800718,0.47409847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010783239,0.0003044525,0.75547284,0.0001286006,0.00007517992,0.0000053632193,0.00065150496,0.09139876,0.056687348,0.043822173,0.049671806,0.0007036184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022791075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018492611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51243067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045726483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028649308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.8238363909286305,"score_gpt":0.67728162911672,"score_spread":0.14655476181191052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410612411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91780835,0.061450195,0.00017449402,0.01466116,0.00085611414,0.0009526776,0.000010244346,0.0000041656276,0.004082614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994964,0.0038126041,0.00018583477,0.00028013077,0.000005769087,0.00007084658,1.4707238e-7,0.0000024543756,0.0006781802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915592,0.0005220213,0.0009059036,0.00073827733,0.00567343,0.00060113217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857699,0.0069298297,0.0003276367,0.00084088714,0.0060490924,0.00008259846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06750784,0.00015324316,0.00045092579,0.014988575,0.0008353671,0.0004925784,0.0025841224,0.000029072602,0.000024551613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08367249,0.000065793036,0.00011766833,0.2165027,0.0033003092,0.00059490156,0.0019348009,0.00029855603,0.0000118367925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041120563,0.0008086622,0.52689075,0.00032669908,0.00011084129,0.00018212262,0.033630107,0.0004290024,0.005078502,0.37953058,0.037021384,0.015580107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004723993,0.00027742513,0.6470588,0.0012863323,0.000036234356,0.000029569788,0.24766405,0.0064224103,0.018457094,0.06518506,0.0082771825,0.000581865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007070712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014396721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31434554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024245567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040584602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410818492","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09048-1","title":"The pivot penalty in research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"University College London; Georgetown University; Northwestern University; Brigham Young University; National Science Foundation; Yale University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Productivity; Point (geometry); Computer science; Data science; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.7627360321146428,"score_gpt":0.7272791267903327,"score_spread":0.03545690532431012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410818492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4617969,0.028102394,0.00015623053,0.08509276,0.0024736142,0.00061810104,0.000013165353,0.000026009082,0.42172083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95689416,0.00040393838,0.00007539971,0.00048759428,0.000050253657,0.000012419805,5.114609e-7,0.0000028330007,0.04207287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869412,0.0006786219,0.0003988295,0.00054647407,0.010715929,0.00071891356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97311383,0.02169842,0.00004849371,0.0010255594,0.0039758245,0.00013783797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07862606,0.00006726901,0.00013363971,0.05313491,0.0006125952,0.0027736395,0.0041047386,0.0006588015,0.00015223766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1459223,0.00003289402,0.00006909282,0.37049016,0.0002409397,0.00018832748,0.0010447139,0.0051847985,0.0003242536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032329495,0.00005463809,0.0825398,0.000001993005,0.0000038300336,0.00001456777,0.00004244132,0.0000054280326,0.00015653844,0.054560572,0.6149104,0.24767742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017094714,0.000019424755,0.26592764,0.000006651513,2.7830893e-7,6.0009074e-7,0.00030573996,0.0006832101,0.00029584893,0.094379105,0.6381736,0.000036995523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006990579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034248029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49509728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015103689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040499525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410824289","doi":"10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i2.79811","title":"Multi-dimensional research impact assessment through bibliometrics, altmetrics, semantometrics, and webometrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Webometrics; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.6336736663487719,"score_gpt":0.6536435045868374,"score_spread":0.01996983823806553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410824289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7175552,0.02797969,0.21857563,0.012535719,0.0049109124,0.0012275123,0.00024240425,0.00016643571,0.016806487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314602,0.030345438,0.026333181,0.0005769828,0.00041028322,0.0000024383453,0.000025514248,0.00004699028,0.01079896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95500916,0.00302293,0.0017632549,0.0018637904,0.035918668,0.0024222147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92228043,0.046047464,0.0009859357,0.0018432875,0.024066538,0.004776368],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10589989,0.0005647212,0.0012258077,0.5078047,0.0029805836,0.0052008852,0.0062990175,0.0009244899,0.002429693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23327969,0.00042185964,0.00072375627,0.74268264,0.0015910752,0.0024929808,0.004548239,0.0049683424,0.00018372333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022589539,0.0020342353,0.42694107,0.000053246167,0.00049458985,0.0028575,0.00025782845,0.000103183425,0.00015637239,0.0036749933,0.3172448,0.24595629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008754035,0.0011046923,0.7717355,0.00027002534,0.00009687262,0.00076660956,0.0025385246,0.025213977,0.00013618481,0.008107297,0.18036407,0.000912207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006400062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049823768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34479445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002155183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047169826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410907320","doi":"10.1080/14459795.2025.2508460","title":"A framework for independent research using industry funding: the Massachusetts model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Gambling Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Business; Operations research; Regional science; Management; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9351945172701203,"score_gpt":0.7403965404133352,"score_spread":0.19479797685678502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410907320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4658799,0.0046154317,0.46824476,0.045953747,0.005007924,0.0008686853,0.00008551571,0.000046713525,0.00929734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97632515,0.00022231914,0.012667947,0.00045715863,0.00028376337,0.000083969186,0.000001200488,0.000009497149,0.0099490145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984903,0.00020334197,0.00064470444,0.00066241913,0.008006571,0.000633925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963843,0.023751263,0.00020841323,0.00065186206,0.011424731,0.00012076772],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035223596,0.00013510392,0.00024824732,0.027162032,0.0010276666,0.0023254019,0.0031951086,0.00023024534,0.000038002552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14497495,0.000081206665,0.00015910761,0.048526242,0.00035460855,0.00030542148,0.0019576012,0.0011350599,0.000023907582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020775414,0.0003151199,0.1368599,0.00003108777,0.0009656123,0.000013156767,0.0021432564,0.04307343,0.00077621924,0.65966165,0.10295162,0.05300123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029320005,0.00003027067,0.003825667,0.00009398808,0.000010015344,0.0000019218246,0.0049332213,0.29134673,0.0003300966,0.6801387,0.018885965,0.00011023823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003013204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014081456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51044524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048698255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003576698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987103},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4411039083","doi":"10.1002/pan3.70057","title":"Navigating the editorial and publishing process at <i>People and Nature</i>: Advice for (and requests to) authors and reviewers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"People and Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09287082460303388,"score_gpt":0.5234968734046008,"score_spread":0.43062604880156696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411039083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89804703,0.072585054,0.0000566194,0.021475561,0.0065323478,0.00080857053,0.00007686075,0.000025173475,0.00039280267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866163,0.007483036,0.0008560042,0.0018685019,0.002297471,0.00006118447,0.000011526788,0.000014644967,0.000791328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602455,0.00013190212,0.00038903044,0.0008990038,0.0021126412,0.0004428597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105394,0.006418421,0.00016049789,0.00033060077,0.0016477281,0.0003888393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120296255,0.00019544119,0.0003842064,0.002684423,0.00097092753,0.0052049896,0.0006000771,0.0005709022,0.00000631919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05684818,0.00011593722,0.00004036104,0.030449742,0.00011902769,0.0011056988,0.0010075147,0.0014975183,5.9245394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021380176,0.000036011872,0.2172715,0.00046342926,0.000049078193,0.000002797881,0.0041933423,9.102164e-7,0.0003213745,0.0021708657,0.5190437,0.2562332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019301178,0.00028567138,0.24545336,0.00039271777,0.000086845146,0.000047877194,0.0027917342,0.0016964991,0.00045878798,0.024313755,0.7219756,0.0005669935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001176114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006215003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2556662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027762339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001037672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411292408","doi":"10.1002/bes2.70026","title":"The <scp>ESA</scp> Editorial Fellowship: Navigating the Publishing Landscape as Early‐Career Scientists From the Global South","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0986299942945382,"score_gpt":0.4136103137856787,"score_spread":0.31498031949114047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411292408","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016973631,0.0022836253,0.00010728562,0.027561538,0.94106084,0.001152846,0.0017412732,0.000050063725,0.009068885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041913018,0.0010408739,0.0011847954,0.0019068216,0.94488305,0.00010467967,0.00006258109,0.000041853466,0.008862344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706936,0.0019430475,0.0017411476,0.0014886161,0.022736663,0.001396964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7362761,0.24139316,0.005097491,0.004288766,0.012407064,0.00053741003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03941222,0.0005302263,0.0010798959,0.00044162403,0.0035004448,0.008805761,0.02113598,0.0014353829,0.00049508916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38914308,0.0001981737,0.0019527874,0.048018634,0.0052187475,0.00015356779,0.009442995,0.004416337,0.00017794533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020946121,0.00009631221,0.013741761,0.000006649662,0.00018391965,7.448104e-7,0.00046842205,0.00002469188,0.0000038237613,0.000044414104,0.9779729,0.007435362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045336905,0.00022685023,0.03036845,0.0000720341,0.0000767685,3.6790368e-7,0.0039328677,0.00017094244,0.000011570409,0.0034405969,0.9611309,0.000115279654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00441372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044906446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34973085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033276947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014981583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411466289","doi":"10.1177/03400352251351113","title":"Open access publishing in an African context: Notable improvements and recurring challenges","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFLA Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Context (archaeology); Electronic publishing; Descriptive statistics; Kenya; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.7889256432296887,"score_gpt":0.6569215348505064,"score_spread":0.1320041083791823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411466289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92481965,0.009436239,0.0006803797,0.011124234,0.0009729321,0.00033802853,0.000009243334,0.000009168945,0.05261014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609965,0.0021858725,0.00032308,0.0003500732,0.00007035756,0.000008415084,4.882673e-7,0.0000060042203,0.0009560836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946343,0.0003378702,0.0006959564,0.00058031146,0.0031782305,0.00057335873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954658,0.0015536861,0.00028395528,0.00043470855,0.0018217725,0.00044005754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035293162,0.00011657274,0.00030498716,0.04387546,0.00039741036,0.08573349,0.008108103,0.00008687628,0.00018325602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02640542,0.000082791,0.000043808333,0.07108714,0.00006760993,0.017145932,0.0051044985,0.0006609623,0.0000073197725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002890252,0.00008706991,0.15458038,0.0000041266817,0.0000083509285,0.0000310252,0.0003534047,0.0000065504837,0.00011100314,0.0013359569,0.0028566632,0.84059656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024051068,0.00023175035,0.8444107,0.00017988696,0.000004964668,0.000033985245,0.007019724,0.0037658948,0.00038624034,0.0868189,0.054486927,0.00025589735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005124555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012844481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8403407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016584941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034693966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411622207","doi":"10.1038/d41586-025-01926-y","title":"What incentives do companies need to publish research?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publication; Business; Accounting; Economics; Advertising","score_opus":0.520772851748931,"score_gpt":0.6429454551108235,"score_spread":0.1221726033618925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411622207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7072991,0.032002695,0.000590478,0.116266824,0.010039037,0.0011184886,0.00005162617,0.00010679399,0.13252495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663811,0.000485409,0.0005028591,0.0022189675,0.00012694899,0.000016814502,0.000003824488,0.0000071644163,0.030256948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841267,0.0005414003,0.00045927812,0.0009644296,0.013028823,0.00087940507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97920036,0.008093951,0.000075423144,0.0012367092,0.010895602,0.0004979369],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032282397,0.00013749795,0.00029678247,0.11050945,0.00053397135,0.024564244,0.00494579,0.0008386612,0.00061964523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11138305,0.00009262676,0.0001229409,0.40209615,0.00025029943,0.0024428945,0.0025804031,0.0035228436,0.000686521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038605445,0.0000883544,0.01737878,0.0000049446217,0.000013116004,0.000008279038,0.00028652113,0.000009607586,0.00034546535,0.023052374,0.84759986,0.111174084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025757455,0.00006468446,0.11275518,0.000045415298,0.0000016556644,7.7076936e-7,0.006756647,0.00022252284,0.00087419344,0.045199625,0.8337033,0.00011845929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003440652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045266355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2915867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018374735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035470282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411687368","doi":"","title":"Scholarly publishing’s hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal; Consortium For Research and Innovation In Aerospace In Quebec","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Library science; Scholarly communication; Oligopoly; Scopus; Impact factor; Distribution (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7949869484321319,"score_gpt":0.6946953970868245,"score_spread":0.10029155134530743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411687368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978684,0.045225978,0.0023855441,0.02044823,0.0023476891,0.0011675808,0.00038525835,0.000039122246,0.030132225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322815,0.008190313,0.00022481386,0.0011242217,0.0001492527,0.000017769788,0.000014731466,0.000022817794,0.007027935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805985,0.0015204024,0.0016871027,0.0011875805,0.013972629,0.001033781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731491,0.012074218,0.0021983527,0.0020065582,0.009859005,0.0007127724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04844045,0.0003701744,0.0010773428,0.0759122,0.0015129289,0.10426724,0.038326964,0.00028667308,0.0051646824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1711451,0.00024079636,0.0004228194,0.19103618,0.0008370955,0.08670873,0.035843655,0.0022398683,0.000014862278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081663035,0.000095166135,0.52010053,0.000020180269,0.00011805321,0.000017710372,0.00015687867,0.000009850535,0.0026704653,0.0013344146,0.41573945,0.05965564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007545114,0.000015997713,0.84787315,0.00017220447,0.000071165305,0.00000546748,0.0047252392,0.00016522485,0.006701717,0.047776688,0.091390826,0.00034783295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002908671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006663154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32777262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028803822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012919103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411730359","doi":"10.1177/10497315251352828","title":"A Guest Editorial: Turning Your Research into a Best-Seller—An Innovative Approach to Knowledge Mobilization and Becoming Newsworthy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Research on Social Work Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.7254687325639142,"score_gpt":0.6904742155733132,"score_spread":0.034994516990600966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411730359","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011761184,0.0018975002,0.00062734477,0.004494699,0.8991617,0.0034024424,0.0001313583,0.00010277807,0.08900606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002542649,0.0014271407,0.002614494,0.000066892055,0.96883744,0.00072724035,0.00022839516,0.00014090736,0.02341484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9094426,0.021359816,0.0022271387,0.0046637184,0.05895357,0.0033531669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49921122,0.32234067,0.0013563752,0.0033825554,0.1710307,0.0026784686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29294723,0.00074824784,0.0014679192,0.114477344,0.0073373923,0.018364474,0.0071770246,0.0029665162,0.000080253354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.75230527,0.00065318303,0.00022317328,0.49268898,0.0012868923,0.0026852705,0.0074531566,0.014962807,0.0010858482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011655092,0.0016894207,0.000059932405,0.00009645835,0.00009940442,0.000018274419,0.00991272,0.000016631178,0.00004055374,0.0011277238,0.9183959,0.06737752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084641116,0.0011039828,0.00006668414,0.00023880009,0.000021205575,7.938101e-7,0.024457248,0.00012132737,0.000024585148,0.0017045834,0.9708424,0.0005719657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015459881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014346131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45935804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028507058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009034579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412064833","doi":"10.59350/bibliomagician.2966","title":"Citation issues resulting from Canada's new RDM mandate – a tipping point for Open Science? Guest post by Jeffrey Demaine","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RDM; Tipping point (physics); Mandate; Citation; Open science; Point (geometry); Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.48570016698192575,"score_gpt":0.565686237185776,"score_spread":0.07998607020385029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412064833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69188696,0.007353915,0.12988001,0.08916416,0.02030976,0.0122501915,0.010262627,0.0001858321,0.038706534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684071,0.00037945597,0.059834253,0.0023886934,0.0012645709,0.00011520931,0.001388545,0.000083922016,0.06613831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795711,0.00023087951,0.0016927846,0.0030149869,0.014168168,0.001322058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97505814,0.0091838455,0.0012130509,0.0025505724,0.010778929,0.0012154769],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044553135,0.00045169776,0.0009523744,0.03431662,0.0008376596,0.022140445,0.016382286,0.00029981276,0.00077014253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11989863,0.0003305359,0.00019129283,0.07899506,0.00023410423,0.0014348208,0.015081996,0.00064177817,0.00017400013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001351535,0.00007946121,0.010407915,0.00003204284,0.000049472877,0.000009586511,0.00042880565,0.00040955583,0.0070252013,0.0004634552,0.91517085,0.065788485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006011705,0.0007243426,0.07662555,0.0006928061,0.00008699217,0.000009180348,0.0065978966,0.15136115,0.048102558,0.06409569,0.64234537,0.0033467915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9062994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3974339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5088655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010152591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011128235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412159529","doi":"10.1097/paf.0000000000001061","title":"Trends in Publication Outcomes of Platform Presentations at National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) Annual Meetings From 2013 to 2022","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scripting language; Presentation (obstetrics); Publication; Library science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Peer review; World Wide Web; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Surgery","score_opus":0.17258907904906207,"score_gpt":0.5250327767110547,"score_spread":0.3524436976619927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412159529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93624985,0.00020230428,0.0014121754,0.058881294,0.0005677061,0.00008430281,0.00007869588,0.000002920762,0.00252076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957236,0.00015287516,0.001351567,0.00089927367,0.000084525134,0.000005223943,0.000024513296,0.000004611337,0.0017537919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691463,0.0004020662,0.002036299,0.00031733702,0.010019963,0.0003096971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980467,0.0094589265,0.0022665171,0.00028021276,0.007238721,0.00028860205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023528127,0.000120334196,0.0008738518,0.041550655,0.00004839467,0.000030557145,0.0012488494,0.00012498033,0.0012053137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108607754,0.000080794765,0.00014191237,0.053353462,0.0005790835,0.0002811875,0.0003184578,0.00035199747,0.000007646726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006410726,0.00010302549,0.64196974,0.0000017548356,0.000050167873,0.0000101824635,0.0010312857,0.00003645957,0.0004517705,0.00064903905,0.16504858,0.19058387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012638977,0.0007347541,0.9852679,0.00003092529,0.000021309985,0.000015405403,0.0033686038,0.00040536726,0.00022030645,0.0022523769,0.0063531175,0.00006603523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010894039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047588578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34329817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031519312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044879562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412187308","doi":"10.1177/09610006251353385","title":"Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Precarity; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.640031349098399,"score_gpt":0.557906649263912,"score_spread":0.082124699834487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412187308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97226965,0.0005736956,0.0055685295,0.006025972,0.0006421913,0.00020140415,0.00000893676,0.000004180291,0.014705451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794245,0.0009085688,0.00058642525,0.00050487847,0.000023425442,0.0000042816464,4.465256e-7,0.000001066908,0.000028472467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950182,0.00011442089,0.0010577339,0.00022933062,0.0032983827,0.0002819546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961551,0.0012831178,0.0004898755,0.00019734706,0.0014039862,0.00047056424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035215177,0.00008745375,0.00026173415,0.036978547,0.00054333714,0.074255705,0.003794155,0.00006443935,0.000018452407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0491188,0.000060813436,0.00002207568,0.06500434,0.00053822703,0.23296995,0.005208442,0.000375954,9.698765e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003460644,0.000009603587,0.79413074,0.000033515178,0.0000036783401,0.0000025451554,0.0007613679,0.00007142663,0.000049784943,0.08003098,0.0005927841,0.12427898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008481869,0.00005151608,0.95932287,0.000184355,0.000003217432,0.00008264187,0.0021557063,0.008822387,0.00015010616,0.021461515,0.006818216,0.00009930713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088838955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009804515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16519211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093006216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017356757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412196964","doi":"10.59350/pkp.8828","title":"Canadian Student Journal Forum and PKP's Open Journal Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8211044885345252,"score_gpt":0.6649789251546205,"score_spread":0.15612556337990469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412196964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.576002,0.027925247,0.016795656,0.1126209,0.11272059,0.0063700667,0.00083172595,0.0001372707,0.14659652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86052686,0.006748595,0.0012374407,0.0005335148,0.001122441,0.000036289854,0.000007318943,0.00006553094,0.12972198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98052466,0.00066160265,0.001695346,0.0010384754,0.014685571,0.0013943383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540425,0.0021695518,0.0008407257,0.0010759406,0.006733138,0.0037763785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07013216,0.00031274703,0.0008115675,0.13413249,0.001387194,0.13198268,0.013840106,0.00041376546,0.0010523043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020180112,0.00019403752,0.00021885782,0.06959079,0.000107381245,0.0008556537,0.014497614,0.0024915903,0.0006747372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006187349,0.00003543812,0.26826727,0.000007720506,0.000100321486,0.000531172,0.00014069426,0.00039477253,0.000002410476,0.00082838495,0.6987556,0.03092999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015360204,0.00047655555,0.33905506,0.00028387,0.000046222132,0.0025055879,0.032189813,0.011457282,0.0000066627904,0.093222566,0.5180147,0.001205618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21996644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15031445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28452486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005224829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412397025","doi":"10.1093/reseval/rvaf031","title":"Evaluating the cross-disciplinary utility of anonymizing applications for scientific equipment in the Australian research sector","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Evaluation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"University of New South Wales; Australian Government; Astronomy Australia Limited; Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation; National Computational Infrastructure","keywords":"Discipline; Cross disciplinary; Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9742932159734768,"score_gpt":0.8049896586778139,"score_spread":0.16930355729566293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412397025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97175837,0.0033364317,0.0023212493,0.009034601,0.0005052133,0.00869647,0.00011168108,0.000019358788,0.0042166174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934925,0.000036863596,0.0006797752,0.0000072373027,0.00023010442,0.0027969957,0.000032715383,0.000014122484,0.0027097077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.90927094,0.012113137,0.00205179,0.0023536463,0.07194311,0.0022673744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89160895,0.07744381,0.00019244054,0.0028230154,0.027668899,0.00026289158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6735944,0.00013264883,0.00022499423,0.032447062,0.0026591371,0.009733909,0.0045631677,0.00012960297,0.0008806669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097261205,0.000069411566,0.000188171,0.2006496,0.0018152682,0.0007301497,0.0011778936,0.0011717334,0.00023482431],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030626231,0.0005795026,0.018236067,0.00037733288,0.00003905615,0.0000040311934,0.007060245,0.0017726008,0.031520396,0.017519614,0.047807194,0.8747777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048269317,0.0006418193,0.09229555,0.00009834594,0.0000096221665,0.000003103196,0.004840068,0.65191764,0.0022915346,0.2257202,0.021581301,0.000118124204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009783325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012393697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8746596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050442066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002843059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401998","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.12","title":"Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Communications Research Centre Canada; University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs; Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine","keywords":"Data science; Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.9677277945080556,"score_gpt":0.8158772839024488,"score_spread":0.15185051060560673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412401998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012399905,0.9851343,0.008170649,0.00028166562,0.0011196407,0.004026309,0.00009914198,0.000017424867,0.0011496434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000009782035,0.9917482,0.0067205313,0.0000854163,0.000042290445,0.0006038932,0.000001908966,0.000013594597,0.00077437557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731176,0.00076054106,0.009169303,0.002142729,0.013678794,0.0011310623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3532565,0.48010263,0.052931298,0.007672972,0.105318196,0.0007184233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20996252,0.00051145616,0.0053882967,0.45521215,0.0016726707,0.0013174338,0.008398178,0.00010344408,0.000032086446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88385916,0.0002342794,0.0016658652,0.92033035,0.0038734374,0.0008794062,0.0029955967,0.00038928926,0.000033338183],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018587315,0.00002883032,0.000043076663,0.07469048,0.00018729328,0.0000023552514,0.00006809134,0.0000036365002,0.0000017193408,0.0012771764,0.0071013295,0.91659415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016871876,0.00041916125,0.00017431816,0.7316606,0.0012136259,0.000009727175,0.0020191448,0.00025610335,0.00002878945,0.002366864,0.26100108,0.00068183546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024914034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013047559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026430737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005664104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412480951","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.23216","title":"Unraveling current issues in scholarly publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.2318400514078995,"score_gpt":0.4711040804426722,"score_spread":0.2392640290347727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412480951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8928244,0.010040196,0.0041942,0.032615744,0.0026692615,0.00016176597,0.000021017688,0.000007691171,0.05746573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971224,0.0003623504,0.0012117326,0.00100255,0.000028635804,3.432336e-7,7.8537926e-7,0.0000010064513,0.00027017694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962844,0.00005688,0.0007965415,0.00011858714,0.0024065934,0.000336996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620944,0.00043329567,0.00027408445,0.00017434827,0.0020740263,0.00083479605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017457154,0.00005744845,0.00013169998,0.10531538,0.00033073494,0.053314112,0.0023602338,0.000042407515,0.0001399322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046344418,0.00004100864,0.00003243922,0.12249228,0.0002817074,0.114952706,0.00017985846,0.00044003187,0.00001661836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034519755,0.0000036154422,0.33075815,0.000004874032,9.175154e-7,0.0000040185605,0.0007225209,0.000065054795,0.000010505788,0.025662879,0.017095461,0.6256686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002443514,0.000028213375,0.46847802,0.00007504043,6.11521e-7,0.000010759101,0.0018632711,0.0043961117,0.00014659601,0.013817495,0.5108726,0.00006689232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058145775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021259958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62560165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092528346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006517155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412485041","doi":"10.32920/29586197","title":"A Mismatch Between Open Science Practices and Intentions in North America: Barriers and Incentives for Early Career and Senior Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.7238153814393795,"score_gpt":0.6311112647266011,"score_spread":0.09270411671277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412485041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986761,0.0011467942,0.0019063051,0.003669722,0.00015495307,0.002076116,0.00048024813,0.000013177252,0.0037916985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862611,0.0015044337,0.008812911,0.00008532972,0.000026285925,0.00017312593,0.00000968898,0.000009201195,0.0031178957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001986,0.00044091846,0.00078989204,0.0022288396,0.0056573893,0.00086311816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981675,0.011169685,0.0006486838,0.0009433616,0.0044231587,0.0011401024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032750346,0.00026011936,0.00066756026,0.047887832,0.0007260374,0.01619933,0.005025733,0.00019335203,0.000042152187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13920918,0.00019070959,0.000067664354,0.09051472,0.0023997552,0.0018724801,0.022110438,0.00085071067,0.0000026724474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049383507,0.00002840378,0.90702605,0.000053948905,0.00003163532,0.0000035039898,0.0013848754,0.000003997964,0.000042532247,0.00014621971,0.0007037814,0.09052568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076050987,0.00018520198,0.9700324,0.00007002231,0.000023458386,0.000001310655,0.012512507,0.0037023725,0.00008035957,0.0055535333,0.0067675468,0.0003108012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075764973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10645883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017348255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002167239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412485042","doi":"10.32920/29586197.v1","title":"A Mismatch Between Open Science Practices and Intentions in North America: Barriers and Incentives for Early Career and Senior Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.7238153814393795,"score_gpt":0.6311112647266011,"score_spread":0.09270411671277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412485042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986761,0.0011467942,0.0019063051,0.003669722,0.00015495307,0.002076116,0.00048024813,0.000013177252,0.0037916985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862611,0.0015044337,0.008812911,0.00008532972,0.000026285925,0.00017312593,0.00000968898,0.000009201195,0.0031178957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001986,0.00044091846,0.00078989204,0.0022288396,0.0056573893,0.00086311816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981675,0.011169685,0.0006486838,0.0009433616,0.0044231587,0.0011401024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032750346,0.00026011936,0.00066756026,0.047887832,0.0007260374,0.01619933,0.005025733,0.00019335203,0.000042152187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13920918,0.00019070959,0.000067664354,0.09051472,0.0023997552,0.0018724801,0.022110438,0.00085071067,0.0000026724474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049383507,0.00002840378,0.90702605,0.000053948905,0.00003163532,0.0000035039898,0.0013848754,0.000003997964,0.000042532247,0.00014621971,0.0007037814,0.09052568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076050987,0.00018520198,0.9700324,0.00007002231,0.000023458386,0.000001310655,0.012512507,0.0037023725,0.00008035957,0.0055535333,0.0067675468,0.0003108012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075764973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10645883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017348255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002167239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412538861","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/dmgex_v2","title":"Open Science, Closed Peer Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Austrian Science Fund; University of Oxford","keywords":"Peer review; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.851523223465649,"score_gpt":0.7155276012480258,"score_spread":0.13599562221762318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412538861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008900084,0.006809504,0.0021649466,0.037489213,0.0032918046,0.002045336,0.00021092477,0.00004920395,0.9470491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023172783,0.008768906,0.011389989,0.006975828,0.00014197765,0.00014914009,0.000036064856,0.000012710229,0.9493526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93823653,0.00038972628,0.0017024227,0.0032678458,0.055301867,0.0011016134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92291635,0.0051991716,0.0008142072,0.007135096,0.06279751,0.0011376572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2274453,0.000336637,0.0010631157,0.14464717,0.00060221564,0.02980269,0.067702904,0.00028852932,0.00814842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3449046,0.00020776215,0.00036650652,0.45717978,0.00074647466,0.001040631,0.11423423,0.0012074492,0.0018907815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038731196,0.00007521608,0.0019506124,0.000073591575,0.000008984166,0.0000053470617,0.000012670707,0.000008164599,0.000015172303,0.0063866703,0.8389624,0.1524973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022434417,0.000034268578,0.011438447,0.00042884794,0.000014162533,0.0000017826757,0.000052479514,0.0019013926,0.0003075706,0.060899522,0.92433923,0.00035794664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057888596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000295257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3125326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037680328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077116396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412551538","doi":"10.51408/issi2025_017","title":"Almost Always Unequal: Co-Authors’ Contributions to Scientific Publications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.6357176527873419,"score_gpt":0.6712944468782471,"score_spread":0.035576794090905195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412551538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06004998,0.00027896982,0.3659765,0.08778074,0.0030979495,0.0011507793,0.00090096623,0.00025890538,0.4805052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7664326,0.000012873502,0.0015552453,0.0008984497,0.000043537864,0.00007060656,0.000041496594,0.000006163633,0.23093903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899177,0.00024863303,0.0008848174,0.0011612101,0.0069228983,0.00086474896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784233,0.0054565817,0.00013400106,0.0019670082,0.013032035,0.0009870789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031150257,0.00014762628,0.0002811273,0.11291465,0.0015173673,0.012131835,0.0037381533,0.00013189718,0.0027591581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12511198,0.00010527237,0.000165477,0.45798182,0.0003265649,0.00068759144,0.00097385125,0.00025593,0.006201912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037118696,0.00013308086,0.012118246,8.6931817e-7,0.0000088624265,7.630643e-7,0.000040269046,0.000031631425,0.001696481,0.20929277,0.748625,0.028048346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023049417,0.000037737587,0.041102074,0.0000041904345,0.0000042174433,7.9222787e-7,0.00029400052,0.0028219407,0.0040071546,0.02347951,0.92787933,0.00013854243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010148853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009255989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70638263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002545022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009955413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412559609","doi":"10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22290","title":"Bibliodiversity of Small Academic Publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2507105811090861,"score_gpt":0.43050092969869774,"score_spread":0.17979034858961163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412559609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300411,0.00062032696,0.002138985,0.0053483434,0.00080343965,0.00007597038,0.000026231724,0.0000033338688,0.060942296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972012,0.00012963588,0.0011441672,0.0009847083,0.000010495265,1.1233158e-7,6.3181307e-7,6.323211e-7,0.0005284301],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715644,0.000037594822,0.00065730984,0.00009222484,0.0017989423,0.00025748665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630517,0.00043328363,0.0004138477,0.00016712969,0.0018074659,0.00087307685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009226363,0.000050058232,0.00013609102,0.15685259,0.00028586935,0.00385796,0.0025099644,0.000056378714,0.00028654418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013291643,0.00003541722,0.00004793424,0.1972387,0.00070286996,0.023433356,0.0001979108,0.00024200763,0.00001273992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012520312,0.0000042365964,0.6222017,0.000010263475,0.0000051826614,0.0000067020396,0.00066348584,0.00006732802,0.000045087818,0.014103388,0.11972461,0.24315554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030991362,0.0000746123,0.72559905,0.000028100365,0.0000027004198,0.000030346004,0.0025009478,0.0016309179,0.00060994003,0.006273093,0.2628677,0.00007270819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002979718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045365436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24308284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004190376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006013479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412570109","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2500322122","title":"Tenure and research trajectories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Northwestern University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Novelty; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.6341620963141554,"score_gpt":0.6173253069681607,"score_spread":0.01683678934599475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412570109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276152,0.0008183022,0.0000026403081,0.012222397,0.000044559292,0.00017301615,0.000011975783,0.000004669439,0.059107225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661165,0.000102620994,0.00060705363,0.00011489836,0.000031450807,0.0000053123413,1.070991e-8,0.0000012584713,0.002525754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986073,0.00003431291,0.00047380652,0.0004250872,0.012722531,0.00027122657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897081,0.0043682544,0.0002635231,0.000018470928,0.0055687358,0.00007291346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04764666,0.000063729494,0.0001704242,0.0206933,0.00056565873,0.00051988027,0.0026985907,0.000091501395,0.000025676976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06644803,0.000033442553,0.00006365343,0.14347361,0.002833946,0.00066695886,0.0009910591,0.00031190278,0.0000026045504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020958936,0.00007700464,0.24879381,0.000041390835,0.000013193801,9.073328e-9,0.0002607899,0.000011347445,0.102909476,0.59688747,0.03469234,0.016292231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094574396,0.000036656733,0.44333887,0.000030765124,0.0000016137343,0.0000017547679,0.0006284857,0.00061441975,0.070202135,0.4809871,0.0040272987,0.00003630006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013930377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.9587446e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19454508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003912044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013118419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412611926","doi":"10.31134/ap.94.2.20","title":"Exigencia del depósito de los datos de investigación en los criterios de indexación de SciELO","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Archivos de Pediatría del Uruguay","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; SciELO; Philosophy; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2539148528626518,"score_gpt":0.5182398903202017,"score_spread":0.26432503745754987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412611926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95545775,0.0025075998,0.03270975,0.0025157363,0.00073504105,0.0009908013,0.0009128413,0.00036042742,0.0038100262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96570915,0.005113362,0.02135152,0.0027927745,0.0020132626,0.00022238246,0.00006012379,0.00018651142,0.0025509158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778118,0.002775664,0.0020124328,0.0025347718,0.00864879,0.006216518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762419,0.014169767,0.0006380218,0.0024654407,0.0013923754,0.005092483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03744186,0.0010050727,0.001117582,0.055859435,0.0014554468,0.0056855613,0.008332476,0.0009577617,0.0008713202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06158767,0.00095201994,0.00074567914,0.11911472,0.0011588965,0.0013118056,0.004336346,0.0024327931,0.0025578558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001255805,0.0004164467,0.8888109,0.00026812538,0.00009785256,0.0010728241,0.0040163086,0.0017421985,0.01712998,0.0015934709,0.047993496,0.03673285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013715113,0.00034556683,0.70892066,0.00015464083,0.0001613513,0.000387993,0.0012714344,0.23174997,0.0040603625,0.034057733,0.016221507,0.0012972764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020445592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035365508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23000777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017351859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010889914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412676988","doi":"10.7759/cureus.88858","title":"Author and Journal Self-Citation in General Surgery Original Research Articles","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cureus","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Citation; General surgery; Library science","score_opus":0.7754175958995174,"score_gpt":0.6560449212250098,"score_spread":0.11937267467450763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412676988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892676,0.002622306,0.0007627611,0.0040708384,0.00064655213,0.00010422156,0.0000023440757,0.000011280359,0.0025120939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320376,0.0004895655,0.0021093222,0.00006294961,0.000109335466,0.0000067565998,5.454271e-7,0.000004034075,0.004013751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992819,0.00072602276,0.0005662672,0.00040026958,0.0049170353,0.0005714208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806745,0.0086104795,0.000088579334,0.00032955428,0.0026139657,0.00028997552],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058649205,0.00007491691,0.00019736511,0.054192405,0.00034750393,0.0030197736,0.0007467202,0.000088127366,0.00022479035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043734636,0.00005336219,0.00005796628,0.13734588,0.00013697609,0.0006200947,0.00031796008,0.00046017588,0.00008659923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000292396,0.00015603831,0.6765684,0.000006175774,0.000011613415,0.00005786476,0.0003970816,0.000015120129,0.0008668687,0.0082136495,0.1468226,0.16685534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003419648,0.00007377666,0.73346454,0.00002164532,0.0000028833952,0.000023579529,0.0008231666,0.009508348,0.00076764537,0.15271091,0.10214608,0.00011548266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012134428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008003647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16673985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021067639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056326546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412716533","doi":"10.51408/issi2025_125","title":"How is the Sino-US AI Collaboration Reshaped by the China Initiative?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Geopolitics; China; Field (mathematics); Political science; Vulnerability (computing); Regional science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.35066417756335855,"score_gpt":0.5498720311894008,"score_spread":0.1992078536260422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412716533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11724089,0.0027114917,0.014917836,0.6899162,0.00088927796,0.00081910565,0.00012646533,0.00004261657,0.17333613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9037414,0.00015432357,0.00007443446,0.011040105,0.000039859453,0.000022227528,0.0000031152772,0.000003961899,0.08492054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926697,0.00047069028,0.0003543105,0.00049325643,0.005641655,0.00037040026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899222,0.0058043203,0.00014478473,0.00096337294,0.0030598543,0.00010541634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011503884,0.00011808854,0.0001635287,0.012333,0.00090074935,0.010355542,0.0027648045,0.00008406053,0.00077731564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029939188,0.00004598464,0.000090439586,0.26774654,0.00028331205,0.00069481356,0.00059990707,0.00029688797,0.00016950187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109920575,0.000038146503,0.009363566,8.464609e-7,0.000012990111,7.307515e-7,0.0002498613,0.000003622051,0.00043187075,0.0069839284,0.9487539,0.03414955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032361294,0.00007003314,0.07552042,0.0000031216455,0.000005940427,8.672267e-7,0.0028832287,0.013383032,0.005120686,0.022823948,0.87976015,0.000104946834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011356965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010728893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005620994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033935174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412861200","doi":"10.5206/elip.v7i1.22241","title":"Open Access &amp; Scholarly Communication Habits in LIS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emerging Library & Information Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Sociology; Business; Media studies; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.4327821307053743,"score_gpt":0.5868101196489157,"score_spread":0.15402798894354142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412861200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27911282,0.0023009102,0.0042181355,0.047374286,0.00037417124,0.0008435686,0.00003956472,0.00010275653,0.6656338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98174155,0.00090091245,0.003396266,0.0012278099,0.000022088623,0.000059681577,0.00004952765,0.0000075277844,0.012594638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955324,0.00030423724,0.0009179657,0.00036174315,0.0025335832,0.00035006527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995648,0.0014331053,0.00031701114,0.0011279238,0.001334789,0.00013912196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077134874,0.00013864714,0.00024806825,0.05283425,0.0004610559,0.044100415,0.010119309,0.000097071395,0.0011621477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018708397,0.00011472819,0.00008349106,0.14112595,0.000122024816,0.12866819,0.007210541,0.0004634509,0.0005025734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001311628,0.00028868212,0.33055797,0.000018236655,0.000034978693,9.2844095e-7,0.017120747,0.00047428586,0.000036876856,0.19621882,0.32434863,0.13076869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007039785,0.000016582926,0.44006196,0.000044532568,0.0000019193717,7.014307e-7,0.010327002,0.0018402094,0.000247213,0.03477435,0.5118138,0.00016773934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033025804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031100262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70262873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014278774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045768285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412886659","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162577.2","title":"“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Open peer review; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Open science; Plant biology; Open data; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Pandemic; Physiology; Medicine; Neuroscience; History; Biology; Virology; Political science; Pathology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law; Astronomy; Disease; Physics; Outbreak","score_opus":0.7318407363937084,"score_gpt":0.617907542556378,"score_spread":0.11393319383733036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412886659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06963344,0.002233085,0.00094349915,0.83780897,0.0014059261,0.0060909283,0.00037988892,0.000034990222,0.08146928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535759,0.0024473066,0.0014842965,0.008163254,0.00015107161,0.000727899,0.00002547872,0.000030901545,0.03339388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597909,0.0038375622,0.0012415616,0.003280939,0.029498471,0.0023505667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94477993,0.03474274,0.00053292,0.005910242,0.013035571,0.0009985705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1988481,0.00049220084,0.00079827284,0.0673039,0.0031102407,0.070889786,0.060164753,0.00040305537,0.00064521364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19202036,0.00023938359,0.00019298558,0.22654001,0.0046081906,0.0013423006,0.070588395,0.0039586495,0.00020146645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003011995,0.00045256325,0.053294588,0.00014783978,0.000086410844,0.00041360976,0.011103521,0.0002669459,0.0006778537,0.00818303,0.6789321,0.24614036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001141998,0.00022431121,0.35037217,0.00019704693,0.00001555214,0.000032816126,0.0108507,0.013828349,0.00062908675,0.030190937,0.59179515,0.0007219011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034297872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023503287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006322489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018295296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413008886","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.17","title":"On the open road to universal indexing: OpenAlex and Open Journal Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8496207791303315,"score_gpt":0.7015085151665741,"score_spread":0.14811226396375743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413008886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72343045,0.0047936384,0.005313223,0.045385085,0.0030986427,0.0028761544,0.00003046004,0.000014762537,0.2150576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98444134,0.0003677501,0.0014830712,0.0010491215,0.00001796096,0.000032601012,8.1085176e-8,0.0000043423174,0.012603738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920701,0.0005679004,0.0005397624,0.0009108975,0.00530532,0.00060606806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97793674,0.012569264,0.00033355935,0.0007853668,0.007963677,0.00041138317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.068942286,0.0001627217,0.0004527005,0.022924181,0.0037587765,0.022502998,0.013322509,0.000028771174,0.000050350918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13015744,0.00007917738,0.000043965876,0.15301387,0.002459158,0.002463171,0.013385459,0.0003101509,0.0001255087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008570594,0.000059417198,0.0045677065,0.0000031184932,0.00006229147,0.000013355644,0.003384105,0.00015477077,0.00032164503,0.89165,0.08160163,0.018096214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017157347,0.0026567383,0.1781719,0.00048878865,0.000025240495,0.000022523118,0.4463683,0.007576036,0.0006526552,0.26359084,0.09806486,0.0006663574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003149714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057466117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6280592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026724287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009685289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413024604","doi":"10.1002/asi.70013","title":"Understanding discrepancies in the coverage of <scp>OpenAlex</scp> : The case of China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec; China Scholarship Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Geography","score_opus":0.25345515263717894,"score_gpt":0.4762531204382082,"score_spread":0.22279796780102928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413024604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96058667,0.00013301033,0.0070142406,0.02428059,0.00037008032,0.0003364198,0.000020582684,0.000002671698,0.007255763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995866,0.00009821795,0.00006469374,0.00011460066,0.000005227492,0.0000025574632,1.0152261e-7,6.0148267e-7,0.00012741426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961826,0.00009019184,0.00083907304,0.00007276501,0.0026251285,0.00019023582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898437,0.004641227,0.001816756,0.00027786783,0.0033990087,0.00002144136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.044418216,0.00004749222,0.00017289931,0.01591107,0.00046077397,0.0005297453,0.0019416392,0.00007252412,0.000001019791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11444524,0.00001957084,0.00007553293,0.08355657,0.00045443207,0.0016197497,0.00032038754,0.00021986796,5.167143e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013651867,0.00006677442,0.19276787,0.000020317082,0.000032917993,0.0000018055181,0.004090281,0.00033162168,0.0006047405,0.7562651,0.008748167,0.03705675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016081018,0.00035709076,0.2638918,0.00006737998,0.000038738614,0.00020483886,0.06739923,0.009288346,0.00680065,0.59974754,0.050530568,0.00006569522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030275129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040513787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15651755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025861914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040157323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952427},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4413029909","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1614750","title":"Visualisation of research hotspots in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease based on the web of science database","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province","keywords":"Web of science; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Medicine; Metadata; Inflammatory bowel disease; Library science; MEDLINE; Disease; Computer science; Pathology; World Wide Web; Political science; Meta-analysis","score_opus":0.39250363138553346,"score_gpt":0.5436638234530875,"score_spread":0.15116019206755404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413029909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99283564,0.000561553,0.00058889616,0.001329292,0.00058621645,0.00046448017,0.000043379034,0.0000028415816,0.0035877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922866,0.0003695019,0.00018300656,0.000043337546,0.000008505866,0.000030335614,0.0000028632803,0.0000033201852,0.00013050111],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856126,0.0014919573,0.0010139889,0.0005012347,0.010909583,0.00047069168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97737956,0.019399362,0.00026835615,0.0014351902,0.0014040583,0.00011347958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13288152,0.0000926736,0.00029265275,0.07401633,0.00014498743,0.00017937328,0.0027001423,0.00004463281,0.000051397645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026739331,0.000050937535,0.00012575014,0.19831395,0.0022896498,0.00029659737,0.00053929794,0.00028901553,0.000002742911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034874908,0.0003733475,0.95575833,0.00009540421,0.0000056060057,0.00006379118,0.0000919145,0.00033002513,0.000063780535,0.0051106834,0.030076366,0.0076820115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032022063,0.000026292708,0.9495731,0.0002766071,0.0000032177693,1.2593777e-7,0.002808145,0.041566696,0.0008269573,0.003265451,0.001268442,0.000064761174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005466348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049478476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12429762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001306845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012339567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98145884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413072117","doi":"10.26833/ijeg.1680503","title":"Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity performance of International journal of engineering and geosciences WOS example (2016-2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Productivity; Web of science; Library science; Computer science; Scope (computer science); Data science; Political science; Economics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.13927813081264026,"score_gpt":0.4352097000231643,"score_spread":0.295931569210524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413072117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98246145,0.0028637454,0.009107187,0.00039740145,0.0050188797,0.000050169496,0.000029030998,0.0000032573437,0.00006888526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612606,0.0011741515,0.002204471,0.0000069995845,0.000109741064,7.242425e-7,6.800787e-7,0.000003159152,0.00037399796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912668,0.00005286804,0.0013926835,0.00036314418,0.0066486974,0.00027580414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885244,0.0018943085,0.0011568756,0.00021427026,0.008015951,0.000194236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01809413,0.00014454809,0.0005440281,0.3719419,0.000092539536,0.001255727,0.0027499748,0.000058782607,0.000050995764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01839643,0.00010069618,0.00020914026,0.31084386,0.00047418373,0.0015812892,0.00048579348,0.00025340766,4.3058375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009380925,0.00028857726,0.7363949,0.00004415117,0.0008180617,0.000018884455,0.00047869285,0.054351825,0.028745232,0.0005341772,0.0006328681,0.17759886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040279474,0.00028063313,0.83255863,0.00014931073,0.000084260784,0.0000616117,0.0002312155,0.15296596,0.00637941,0.00017246636,0.0065840576,0.00012964556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111343135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006982608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17746922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068884976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043157363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413183986","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scaf034","title":"Stockholm science: the syndrome, not the city!!!","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5103460381164318,"score_gpt":0.5997239427221325,"score_spread":0.08937790460570072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413183986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71894944,0.00038774585,0.00034534934,0.16777828,0.0008218829,0.00038511274,0.000014837278,0.00002963596,0.11128771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844462,0.00010706321,0.000051277693,0.0070901713,0.00008591921,0.000022434351,1.5423909e-7,0.000003100742,0.0081936745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98044163,0.00017529826,0.00051407336,0.001100254,0.01617986,0.0015888817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829464,0.005071183,0.00024342499,0.0027099831,0.008092548,0.0009364741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09971862,0.0001572,0.00020777917,0.06547165,0.006397842,0.020032354,0.012966561,0.000059158032,0.00011467499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16560882,0.00006605465,0.000077537734,0.53999317,0.014753155,0.0025016693,0.004040217,0.00041570794,0.00013652655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004789226,0.00006386207,0.04102083,0.0000022515976,0.0000060100974,0.0000034411485,0.0003527999,0.0000027992955,0.0013597307,0.4908375,0.02103146,0.4453145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021613359,0.00007578223,0.6706313,0.0000054874054,0.000003327064,0.00005339765,0.0014422564,0.0026998213,0.00068816455,0.056231555,0.2677926,0.00016014632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009873975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042828804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6296105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002968065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011033259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413219294","doi":"10.14293/ease.2023.004","title":"Recommendations and Guidelines for Creating Scholarly Biomedical Journals: A Scoping Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa; Impact; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.9265834274666833,"score_gpt":0.7350645275926305,"score_spread":0.1915188998740528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413219294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015284902,0.23202522,0.18739867,0.55047977,0.0016446122,0.0030907227,0.00017817742,0.00028908005,0.009608841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007869477,0.7441074,0.2084301,0.015652211,0.0009225926,0.00032972504,0.00007073717,0.00004745645,0.022570299],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935868,0.00014987895,0.0011555816,0.00046754966,0.004230776,0.00040942724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784299,0.011753843,0.00025022772,0.0003830815,0.008698714,0.00048420503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06845517,0.000085439926,0.000293212,0.03286693,0.0005496036,0.0045840014,0.0008830502,0.000059515125,0.001278725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44903582,0.000052289917,0.00010311524,0.15719035,0.00006756858,0.0012180377,0.0005311793,0.00015276723,0.00021580722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.603966e-7,0.000009683346,0.0014778022,0.00008834456,0.0000042435804,0.0000010909217,0.000011966874,3.615712e-7,0.00011745785,0.0001767427,0.409001,0.5891104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024386882,0.0006883395,0.0141313,0.06840327,0.000057571106,0.00010004018,0.0031602047,0.10441818,0.00032646712,0.048101738,0.7571861,0.0009881092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022166812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010312374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58812225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023332235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021850089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413236578","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/db643_v1","title":"Inventory of Current Approaches, Initiatives, and Practices in Canadian Academic Institutions to Foster the Engagement of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts in the Science-Policy Interface","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public engagement; General partnership; The arts; Public relations; Political science; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Public policy; Public administration; Indigenous; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9227142591576021,"score_gpt":0.658692618542499,"score_spread":0.264021640615103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413236578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8798394,0.005313948,0.00017540173,0.018055128,0.00042599224,0.0017563951,0.0001642989,0.000004418535,0.09426497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998525,0.00074141816,0.00011513729,0.0004224318,0.000039107435,0.00007000689,0.00000144217,0.0000021669991,0.000083293744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926062,0.00087463687,0.00093135313,0.0008172955,0.0041712667,0.0005992146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478406,0.0032147362,0.00066061935,0.0004580112,0.00074247125,0.00014007994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06001115,0.00017731052,0.00035323043,0.069595695,0.0006884053,0.0012942244,0.0039818673,0.00012548198,0.000019616125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03541179,0.000097372256,0.000047016714,0.080083184,0.0037477654,0.00084839045,0.004528987,0.0012497376,0.0000013622599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000271703,0.00030378485,0.17338865,0.00025487688,0.0000261606,0.0000026108246,0.09488655,0.00065609376,0.000065431435,0.6401048,0.005809394,0.08447451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007733511,0.00030211915,0.68288857,0.00058468914,0.000032806565,0.000005454616,0.12571235,0.006335138,0.0006872946,0.048977252,0.13306065,0.0006403216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06116236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14580213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004085997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008926295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413310034","doi":"10.51224/srxiv.600","title":"Rethinking where and how we publish in health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6415366647049812,"score_gpt":0.5975059528798441,"score_spread":0.04403071182513707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413310034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1787392,0.021012142,0.0062496695,0.6513109,0.00090315705,0.00042395233,0.0000055694486,0.000056564153,0.1412988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665347,0.002483907,0.004052187,0.0011187133,0.000016909184,0.0000041583003,2.108992e-7,0.0000023627915,0.025786875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930298,0.00029792596,0.00039389852,0.0007431738,0.004965367,0.00056988484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405795,0.004500936,0.00012343691,0.0003662749,0.00072642625,0.00022494586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05316036,0.00008580204,0.0002387208,0.07962327,0.00039968514,0.009698839,0.0017349634,0.00007265906,0.00024300099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03057614,0.00005386822,0.000038076723,0.29587084,0.0003245205,0.0012559121,0.00087597675,0.00024237412,0.000016566515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002991288,0.00003534525,0.34259045,0.00001734887,0.000002181122,0.0000031584534,0.0002632803,0.000007548484,0.000024936506,0.059749965,0.2024691,0.3948337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060115755,0.00018756911,0.18691155,0.00011683773,6.837335e-7,0.0000037980217,0.0037462728,0.015370316,0.00010323048,0.40043917,0.3923191,0.00020027079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004801921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010378738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7877955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008711845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005890577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413411404","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2025-0040","title":"How research funding shapes academic outputs: Evidence from communication research paper characteristics and thematic trends in China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"China; Thematic map; Project management; Regional science; Thematic analysis; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Data science; Political science; Library science; Operations research; Computer science; Management science; Business; Geography; Management; Engineering; Sociology; Economics; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.7930535504216464,"score_gpt":0.6508492137836807,"score_spread":0.14220433663796572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413411404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706365,0.0037770844,0.0039912798,0.019403322,0.00015846439,0.00015988834,0.00006868979,0.0000037458547,0.0018010321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866852,0.011304543,0.0017120248,0.00009014734,0.000030240413,0.0000020452496,0.000006570991,0.0000016373207,0.00016758053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.986675,0.00070492714,0.0013160921,0.0003542139,0.0103945695,0.0005551958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98215175,0.010822408,0.0005924671,0.001026403,0.005096495,0.00031047186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16734192,0.00008685335,0.0002744631,0.069390595,0.0008085544,0.008361994,0.0064279805,0.000094503936,0.000042737698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13902353,0.000056174962,0.000021865551,0.11398192,0.0012461053,0.04701956,0.004147354,0.0013207186,0.0000101209225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004519558,0.000026294669,0.072903916,0.000018880997,0.0000047805024,0.0000015148697,0.003286393,0.0000018559275,0.002026432,0.0037903807,0.0050899815,0.91280437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033109635,0.0001031588,0.9287912,0.00047426665,0.0000033110957,0.000011695447,0.007779991,0.035897754,0.00013679676,0.009358284,0.017027155,0.00008526506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008117819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012198811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91271913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017413766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005629117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413564844","doi":"10.64628/aap.e9q7jncyh","title":"Prix Nobel : les chercheurs canadiens aspirent à plus","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.8492307129579211,"score_gpt":0.6045842847151017,"score_spread":0.24464642824281935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413564844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23533788,0.018372657,0.06733172,0.22174849,0.016724126,0.0033616642,0.0011428309,0.00032126324,0.43565938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.742455,0.00493647,0.014536874,0.0015520127,0.0010018809,0.0000997971,0.00007168886,0.00010197076,0.23524429],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731127,0.00096047064,0.002123119,0.003596318,0.017660122,0.0025472452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767437,0.0066635413,0.00074445707,0.0024955198,0.008066439,0.0043556965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023327207,0.0008807525,0.0014842959,0.05731362,0.00076844497,0.007016272,0.010328393,0.0012474493,0.015734628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076465644,0.0006835319,0.00091352337,0.22214054,0.0008785476,0.0004599607,0.010709968,0.003263821,0.0070448816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055707333,0.00032607286,0.02213017,0.00012418741,0.00018766867,0.00034416706,0.0014977775,0.0014019606,0.00034396685,0.03878524,0.15019791,0.78460515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074811454,0.00036996912,0.07906297,0.000087440836,0.000053097738,0.000025236492,0.0014466823,0.077655196,0.0005012122,0.017395483,0.8215613,0.0010933254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11812183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024919683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029548982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071509806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413595410","doi":"10.64628/ab.nssa4eesh","title":"Quarter Life series: how we secured new republishing partners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Series (stratigraphy); History; Geology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6820152912886026,"score_gpt":0.5810615179761768,"score_spread":0.10095377331242583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413595410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02729918,0.0098549845,0.0344948,0.5903846,0.021663776,0.0025529496,0.00048092328,0.0007822672,0.3124865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50383973,0.0026747996,0.011248899,0.0026077142,0.001735163,0.00018283428,0.000162314,0.00010712632,0.47744143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698923,0.0007875752,0.0012978555,0.0026988722,0.024070662,0.0012527009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836806,0.0053262627,0.0010379526,0.004165008,0.0033436571,0.002446507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033427253,0.0004933602,0.000954169,0.09174188,0.00053732086,0.03905852,0.010086117,0.00053417333,0.04142546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10202132,0.00035535166,0.0006808931,0.19467838,0.00016281616,0.0023182111,0.013404939,0.0024010742,0.00036755673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027383687,0.00005669529,0.0035167136,0.000015376188,0.000048580434,0.000033398206,0.00071875926,0.00027102593,0.000013570044,0.0017781605,0.9773042,0.016216094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003430639,0.0001533819,0.002306561,0.000013526367,0.000011000996,0.0000072272987,0.009247262,0.00307151,0.00004109132,0.035623547,0.9486311,0.0005507225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054644205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082308834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5877769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036346412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032599615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413901500","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71964","title":"Building Meaningful Relationships for Equity in the Publishing Ecosystem: Empowering Latin American Research Through Engagement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Pará","keywords":"Publishing; Transformative learning; Equity (law); Latin Americans; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.6480030632747693,"score_gpt":0.6187939220166401,"score_spread":0.029209141258129234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413901500","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12287157,0.0026259483,0.042829216,0.0128324535,0.7967039,0.003953065,0.00052292127,0.000082324346,0.017578643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199248,0.00029369755,0.0031318893,0.000037328053,0.075248495,0.0003564859,0.00006897506,0.000015599133,0.0009227445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98238075,0.005629572,0.0012810562,0.0014350842,0.007987667,0.0012858706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8323745,0.16074003,0.00071773183,0.0010172076,0.004993443,0.00015705213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20151153,0.00021030068,0.0005399628,0.028009648,0.0021685732,0.0045925956,0.002876728,0.00077797775,0.000018705734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44708198,0.00015018013,0.000121930854,0.07215241,0.0003143833,0.0012164548,0.0020731674,0.0036907126,0.00001844129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048341684,0.0000626805,0.025874488,0.000057123838,0.000019968737,0.0000038435355,0.0007503275,0.00010102622,0.000008932706,0.021720324,0.94703877,0.0043141963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005320109,0.00031019238,0.08697496,0.00008360066,0.000015985492,8.077548e-7,0.004714483,0.003856523,0.0000024972105,0.12779741,0.7755098,0.00020173362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075603265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048651737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7970532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012844474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011176324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413904807","doi":"10.1007/s10734-025-01530-z","title":"Geopolitical tensions: impact on and trajectory of Canada-China joint research publications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; China; Joint (building); Higher education; Political science; Trajectory; Regional science; Economic geography; Economic growth; Development economics; Geography; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.619288739869519,"score_gpt":0.6335682549767061,"score_spread":0.014279515107187057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413904807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165217,0.000779708,0.00003097346,0.014055391,0.00073657045,0.0002430642,0.00002303085,0.000009482098,0.06760004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627383,0.000032627646,0.0001359031,0.00019445893,0.00005772382,0.00002635892,0.000005426559,0.0000041182334,0.036805093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437135,0.00032131557,0.00045237262,0.00044304918,0.003989576,0.00042235476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909232,0.0037267816,0.00008912085,0.0007618634,0.004120632,0.000378354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008930418,0.00008290008,0.00017515384,0.030581944,0.00029512457,0.00052676606,0.0006206233,0.00007462389,0.0008812114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016423278,0.00005468203,0.000053330536,0.0676932,0.00020727093,0.00017660686,0.00018136829,0.00028763383,0.000021818883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014843256,0.0004109451,0.14418559,0.00001013508,0.000012659725,3.2931771e-7,0.00005267229,0.000015544476,0.00036946515,0.1864928,0.6550808,0.013354199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007699468,0.00005794361,0.93617547,0.000012793887,0.000001915696,7.789194e-7,0.00016746354,0.00015156847,0.00026369662,0.03193017,0.031113736,0.000047452348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08201486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028059825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7919899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045243834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006376898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414081416","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05928-3","title":"Open access publishing: is urology ready? A survey of authors, readers, and editorial board’s knowledge, impressions and satisfaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Urology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Publishing; Nephrology; Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Open access publishing","score_opus":0.4900108197610373,"score_gpt":0.5898731584514749,"score_spread":0.09986233869043765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414081416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69076264,0.038752694,0.0058291843,0.094677925,0.14095654,0.0012648614,0.0004498134,0.000029244648,0.027277121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568486,0.0011999594,0.00026705713,0.00039313146,0.0011398365,0.0000027287397,0.0000025306967,0.000007254793,0.0013026161],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943876,0.0015383998,0.0012506862,0.0005075199,0.0019072177,0.000408572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98127764,0.011559102,0.001029464,0.00043500253,0.0053143534,0.00038440447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033413175,0.00014113002,0.0006685852,0.03837578,0.00022565947,0.0042056,0.0033594852,0.00028644796,0.00023531757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06241848,0.000098973185,0.00006656732,0.048420493,0.0004207342,0.0027987068,0.0035604206,0.00090223545,0.0000034584277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003497687,0.000059264723,0.35445663,0.0000038260596,0.00004099742,0.0000046667474,0.0001054258,0.000003466343,0.00014127477,0.000524961,0.5589371,0.08537268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095494237,0.0003015197,0.70301664,0.000006352428,0.000025098107,0.000022417496,0.00005406664,0.00022459275,0.000034473538,0.010332156,0.28495952,0.00006819765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022477694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002998958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34856004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004324342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077031757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414096008","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/nduxf_v2","title":"Transforming excellence? From ‘matter of fact’ to ‘matter of concern’ in research funding organizations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Austrian Science Fund; Fondazione Telethon; Wellcome Trust; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Michael Smith Health Research BC; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Excellence; Meritocracy; Competition (biology); Grant funding; Promotion (chess); Empirical research","score_opus":0.7710304275994178,"score_gpt":0.6335879332558711,"score_spread":0.1374424943435466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414096008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.880234,0.00040417892,0.04467528,0.003931519,0.00074446487,0.0012199889,0.000768905,0.000012672172,0.06800899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815744,0.00016291246,0.0030756304,0.00015148656,0.000043463995,0.000033643035,0.000022103239,0.000015847347,0.014920522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849238,0.00059716764,0.0020390907,0.0013503834,0.010240687,0.00084886426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786532,0.01140383,0.00030703863,0.0015251638,0.00775897,0.00035178897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021614762,0.0002471627,0.0009219262,0.12034729,0.00013693955,0.0009379822,0.0051016565,0.00040133361,0.020462018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01733014,0.00018907266,0.00018277134,0.22369817,0.000286786,0.00029049828,0.004410231,0.0010692772,0.00073881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003234081,0.00021428643,0.9431138,0.00011857054,0.000038733393,0.000005118462,0.0033490171,0.000963146,0.005747746,0.00040525137,0.035119146,0.010892817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016661668,0.00028874498,0.7472044,0.001825093,0.00003779752,0.0000016679705,0.014666882,0.0062428825,0.1431611,0.0633542,0.020211032,0.0013400174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009417138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049764506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19590941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027872916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011487189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414155839","doi":"10.7554/elife.90049.3","title":"Gender differences in submission behavior exacerbate publication disparities in elite journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Psychological intervention; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Gender inequality; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7281416742780339,"score_gpt":0.5965459017134839,"score_spread":0.13159577256455002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414155839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746598,0.010104941,0.0007388839,0.003637064,0.0015002358,0.0007683844,0.00017446643,0.000032809014,0.008383399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98290724,0.008368561,0.00043702,0.0002471753,0.000109717774,0.00020249948,0.000033572876,0.000010600397,0.007683621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846434,0.0007669898,0.0018903364,0.0013283286,0.010570504,0.0008004257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919595,0.0026754853,0.0006270413,0.0012333482,0.0030798276,0.0004247945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027365575,0.00031089855,0.0007695425,0.11018804,0.0001418103,0.0060060187,0.003809698,0.00055123284,0.0009721034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03662223,0.00022693061,0.0002113162,0.09127062,0.00012082567,0.0006202352,0.0034912704,0.0015999445,0.00010478891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013594743,0.00023192518,0.9277262,0.000024633582,0.0000055085434,0.000015285514,0.00016410802,0.00003675826,0.0000556396,0.00031654764,0.0078400625,0.06356972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029272732,0.000012025569,0.98401713,0.00015670054,0.0000052871364,0.0000012545064,0.00015283712,0.0031458263,0.00012272528,0.008285876,0.0035632544,0.00024436673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010116332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023183184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06332535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037886144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009177448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414218259","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/q6fpw_v1","title":"University journals in the global academic publishing landscape: Mapping over 19,000 diverse titles","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Discipline; Identification (biology); Scholarly communication; Web of science; Electronic publishing; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.5837607990015768,"score_gpt":0.5647070565081341,"score_spread":0.019053742493442716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414218259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5554465,0.0011342462,0.003950924,0.011589526,0.0004393417,0.00016047277,0.0000459561,0.000021038784,0.427212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98836285,0.00045619122,0.00015833256,0.0012652768,0.000045878212,3.7584374e-7,0.0000012003367,0.0000013742132,0.009708535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941576,0.00033894536,0.00033509007,0.00037365608,0.0043896353,0.00040503318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549323,0.0031922942,0.00011343745,0.00039983503,0.0006341915,0.0001669848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022779569,0.000081521706,0.00015584107,0.030712442,0.00029148304,0.0049103587,0.003731572,0.00014429503,0.00223156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021882504,0.000046660163,0.000092768765,0.21890557,0.00007754541,0.0017724135,0.001048568,0.0005408898,0.00012371388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006300517,0.000017621212,0.693204,0.0000011432255,0.000004998056,0.00002074836,0.00009106597,0.00001856672,0.000008424889,0.0077793957,0.27242893,0.026418852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003462648,0.000005941982,0.6951081,0.00001064719,0.0000021474395,0.0000028751938,0.0067037046,0.0016110721,0.0000030333756,0.01176576,0.2843808,0.000059646496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008331632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002425889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43291634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020945922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021449092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868053},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4414358161","doi":"10.1038/s41893-025-01634-5","title":"Mapping meta-analyses on organochlorine pesticides reveals low methodological quality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Sustainability","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Organochlorine pesticide; Environmental quality; Wildlife; Quality assessment","score_opus":0.8336038478189276,"score_gpt":0.710067715191921,"score_spread":0.12353613262700658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414358161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914066,0.004918129,0.05709558,0.028397955,0.0010326937,0.0013785738,0.00007053902,0.0001677918,0.015532113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603624,0.000029844472,0.004262069,0.0016388906,0.00008337044,0.00005019643,0.0000052524697,0.000008853728,0.007885267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98072886,0.005748656,0.0017974647,0.002035806,0.008645838,0.0010433557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79472095,0.16002832,0.0011991949,0.006345958,0.03665524,0.0010503551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1296833,0.0003945753,0.0017113654,0.032624718,0.00053383684,0.0014969317,0.0033644203,0.0007328101,0.0016286375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76018775,0.00021744806,0.0011249371,0.19589563,0.00049576076,0.00038244374,0.0013889238,0.00195455,0.00005791897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010444414,0.0029279941,0.45427692,0.0007275985,0.0035055904,0.00022033366,0.00054906664,0.001604764,0.0042224145,0.20165771,0.07044953,0.25881365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026056403,0.00009817231,0.5181058,0.0000047708945,0.00014379884,0.0000012880241,0.0016150725,0.00016262988,0.0030506449,0.46385536,0.012468956,0.00023292597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013925486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013734405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6305044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008949759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007733704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414377849","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12414","title":"A Bibliometric Review of a Decade of Integrated Reporting Research <sup>*</sup>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scopus; Audit; Bibliometrics; Content analysis; Web of science; Social network analysis; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.5316980882387053,"score_gpt":0.6206452050134392,"score_spread":0.08894711677473388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414377849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80395114,0.1463487,0.0020859123,0.0018659051,0.00016861124,0.00071600225,0.000031346757,0.000044075674,0.044788286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783519,0.017661018,0.00204668,0.00009066023,0.00004779849,0.000023372664,0.0000027633257,0.000014915663,0.0017608725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98111534,0.0008592521,0.0036912467,0.0012332998,0.012200753,0.00090013107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8858807,0.030774798,0.0052324384,0.003253438,0.07449748,0.00036115613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1257627,0.00020968878,0.0010209574,0.6174054,0.0003145377,0.000795785,0.0032099301,0.00016912162,0.00066941377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6541835,0.00014995699,0.0003972555,0.910379,0.00072368915,0.0007555923,0.0014359676,0.00081042305,0.0000448682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006727905,0.0007206887,0.54555297,0.0020110135,0.00018143261,0.00002312799,0.0021166077,0.000059801005,0.003872608,0.007988978,0.049945004,0.3874605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016317958,0.0006587656,0.734323,0.015132493,0.00010917369,0.0000407452,0.10611984,0.010564296,0.01881484,0.026289789,0.08540363,0.00091158063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008789448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053705417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5284208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000295415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012736596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9002113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414426843","doi":"10.59350/mp76s-rkp03","title":"A Gentle Introduction to Open Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Open science; Open source","score_opus":0.6297198839837761,"score_gpt":0.6657768772410038,"score_spread":0.036056993257227665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414426843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23030649,0.00008359978,0.076033786,0.07972786,0.0029392054,0.000817911,0.0000046703653,0.000038772534,0.6100477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8399369,0.000008118377,0.008768366,0.0016423785,0.00013163706,0.000018538864,3.3134563e-7,0.0000023600212,0.14949138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923846,0.000054412616,0.0003370574,0.00091730367,0.005881612,0.00042502786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430317,0.0006690681,0.000042719184,0.0011006655,0.003546816,0.00033756543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035610557,0.000060332273,0.00013572376,0.08947696,0.00044307072,0.009771009,0.009737423,0.000025722717,0.002249121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067738846,0.000038485774,0.000033600863,0.50386024,0.00018334096,0.0010347611,0.0065504634,0.00008470278,0.0020796289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711893,0.000056428496,0.00931091,4.908468e-7,0.0000019283405,6.628047e-7,0.000027170076,0.0000311197,0.008075826,0.05401348,0.60168475,0.32678655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017051477,0.000066126566,0.08065396,0.0000016847176,0.0000010008819,0.0000011173755,0.00029038446,0.0016220007,0.020340066,0.024496228,0.87227064,0.00008628993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017812868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025138143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6096304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016291933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061750854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414601301","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2424143122","title":"The distinctive innovation patterns and network embeddedness of scientific prizewinners","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Embeddedness; Productivity; Sociology of scientific knowledge","score_opus":0.339970910934151,"score_gpt":0.5208850410943732,"score_spread":0.18091413016022218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414601301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98832375,0.0002289359,0.000048832462,0.0039831437,0.00015111823,0.00021691817,0.000020585323,0.0000034127372,0.0070232917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985248,0.000035373392,0.00034711798,0.00007290274,0.000029669485,0.000006476518,9.168861e-8,0.0000014603554,0.000982124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912669,0.000028808674,0.0007854772,0.0004159056,0.0072535085,0.0002493723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956937,0.0033826637,0.0010038384,0.000031682783,0.005974,0.000038442668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034840878,0.000079321224,0.0001872531,0.00854615,0.0009080234,0.0006784906,0.002881635,0.000066150256,0.000008717679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033846334,0.000038230326,0.00006109346,0.1431467,0.0030882447,0.0006158402,0.00090816565,0.00017231276,5.851705e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028748282,0.00005501109,0.4252707,0.000036248824,0.000021253367,3.2642296e-9,0.00017840344,0.0001259189,0.026533425,0.5127951,0.007260475,0.027694723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011564353,0.000027444175,0.64972466,0.000052577827,0.000004286316,6.383269e-7,0.00056710216,0.003525981,0.028255863,0.31653997,0.0011400677,0.000045777455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008425319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.426308e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22445396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003644762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014704553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414819347","doi":"10.1007/s12237-025-01616-y","title":"A Preliminary Investigation of Research Collaboration Through Scientific Paper Co-authorship in the Gulf of Mexico","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estuaries and Coasts","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley","keywords":"Politics; Bridge (graph theory); Fragmentation (computing); Natural (archaeology); Ecosystem","score_opus":0.44115211480198335,"score_gpt":0.5648879460509428,"score_spread":0.12373583124895948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414819347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867482,0.0016875847,0.00033878436,0.005465998,0.00021503954,0.0003861689,0.0000191072,0.0000038454727,0.005135283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983982,0.00010946542,0.00029392,0.00008285069,0.000012822742,0.00002192951,0.000006085048,0.0000025202119,0.0010722377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926498,0.0009602504,0.0006331402,0.00043719265,0.0050162342,0.0003033812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888889,0.007192976,0.00016483803,0.0005859915,0.0031054853,0.00006180029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034921683,0.00007660286,0.00021047176,0.01399395,0.00039503688,0.0013049056,0.0010433701,0.00009780823,0.00004145649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021497447,0.000046467645,0.000035795616,0.1384013,0.0016712863,0.00058901013,0.00037819069,0.00023868302,0.0000065187583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000425271,0.00030301476,0.65419066,0.00009873476,0.000018764658,0.0000072649277,0.03187447,0.00010283668,0.006385396,0.17197451,0.08892028,0.045698807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045745552,0.00043784585,0.7056068,0.0000831403,0.000004877742,0.0000014241791,0.01829077,0.0010864406,0.01252041,0.24295095,0.018476639,0.000083228035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038227078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033682646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12440735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002844682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054351176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414845510","doi":"10.24106/kefdergi.1795795","title":"Investigation of Studies on Micro-credentials by Bibliometric Analysis Method","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Quality (philosophy); Lifelong learning; Trend analysis","score_opus":0.5019674545803363,"score_gpt":0.6055027287630623,"score_spread":0.10353527418272601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414845510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92824155,0.011195901,0.05153052,0.0018622269,0.0012057385,0.0004086111,0.00016493667,0.00004997346,0.0053405142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97899395,0.0010257825,0.008183179,0.00047408068,0.000034441506,0.000026203415,0.000021839574,0.000013361381,0.01122717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.987456,0.0010320401,0.0018205907,0.0011825422,0.007884017,0.0006247993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733805,0.017878167,0.00090036646,0.0013797773,0.0061048064,0.00035637812],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028333465,0.00028072207,0.0010605515,0.7972701,0.0003012258,0.0013359486,0.0022716487,0.00018439742,0.00033847708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055380043,0.00020868397,0.00053961284,0.9449048,0.00035326218,0.000538807,0.0007760555,0.00027717397,0.00013348593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010475155,0.00031444547,0.3335643,0.00008462988,0.0028382074,0.000016330863,0.00045569075,0.0022047455,0.06225613,0.004121067,0.48751828,0.106521405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001576747,0.00051544764,0.3935974,0.00009506459,0.0007637748,0.0000023620287,0.0026083814,0.010184634,0.52845174,0.042198386,0.019319307,0.0006867495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019967853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026545786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46819898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016804031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023383881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997008},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415039865","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101448","title":"Inflation of the journal impact factor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering","keywords":"Impact factor; Inflation (cosmology); Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation impact; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.5243463108771251,"score_gpt":0.66564752466554,"score_spread":0.14130121378841487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415039865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96372825,0.0011585191,0.017316533,0.0028312518,0.0014705803,0.0008899824,0.000114304275,0.000012965164,0.012477605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977666,0.00015293577,0.0010453227,0.0007640594,0.000035116693,0.000001844314,0.0000017270461,0.0000026162659,0.00022973977],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921694,0.00023372118,0.0017476471,0.00006968565,0.0053970013,0.0003825717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921444,0.0019460607,0.0010727778,0.0005920324,0.0040163207,0.00022842744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012546528,0.00008956198,0.00025566906,0.017843666,0.00040025052,0.00066511676,0.0015923182,0.000077009136,0.000121168945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017910073,0.000044239732,0.00017265986,0.073966205,0.00007628638,0.00060035934,0.00041472097,0.0003422047,0.000035410972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024764115,0.000021248103,0.23638165,0.00011274208,0.000016455728,2.1499864e-7,0.009371806,0.00076058815,0.000009848606,0.00030391957,0.09630085,0.6566959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049226923,0.0002147903,0.91879827,0.00008603037,0.000004055944,0.000013499255,0.01234873,0.009042153,0.00016931041,0.001337635,0.057396263,0.000097004726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008857503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028413373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6824166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004283655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002989381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415055863","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v14n5p65","title":"Principles and Practices in National Rankings: Assessing the Alignment between the Berlin Principles and Brazil’s Folha University Ranking","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Higher education; Compliance (psychology); Quality (philosophy); Journal ranking","score_opus":0.38501424463652717,"score_gpt":0.5885330728110877,"score_spread":0.20351882817456052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415055863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401405,0.0016334525,0.0005237432,0.048523627,0.0011601645,0.00012583988,0.0000044129,0.0000024905412,0.007885805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961961,0.00031233023,0.0006501077,0.00037838254,0.0002680272,0.0000012359925,0.0000015546121,0.00000269384,0.0021896062],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531496,0.00035889412,0.0005586778,0.00021246764,0.0034274878,0.00012752047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925877,0.006696137,0.0011435398,0.00013402218,0.0027057019,0.00006184022],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013536574,0.00007714433,0.00013186668,0.007691842,0.00023688961,0.0019232162,0.0012589926,0.000048400372,0.000046344067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007705539,0.000043705964,0.00005063405,0.007626077,0.00014643473,0.0010809815,0.0003651705,0.0002756883,0.0000019155718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002818115,0.00008363316,0.89845973,0.0000033695835,0.00008062799,0.000003298887,0.00043709375,0.00009240763,0.00012612871,0.04053044,0.0016268322,0.05852827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030253318,0.000012103095,0.80829597,0.00004827557,0.000011955384,0.000011836327,0.0008267051,0.000272202,0.00005594337,0.011247829,0.17887571,0.000038948223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010108199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023498398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17724888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002960684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078420166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415078807","doi":"10.59350/a2td9-k5m27","title":"Did journal articles survive the last ten years?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Evergreen","score_opus":0.650205486005131,"score_gpt":0.5972889964329217,"score_spread":0.05291648957220929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415078807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7163665,0.004147691,0.029874593,0.021101102,0.009738016,0.00090115657,0.0002320669,0.00008797067,0.21755087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939772,0.0010342656,0.0014742917,0.0007072508,0.00047210345,0.0000145067515,0.0000029337755,0.000010435915,0.05651223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98616827,0.00062232837,0.00085912185,0.00071214343,0.011049321,0.00058883836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854763,0.008437602,0.00037144893,0.0014023631,0.0039554327,0.00035682615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040034905,0.00018075094,0.0003760688,0.047610976,0.0003709748,0.011893519,0.0070152143,0.0002194186,0.0023966741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042855065,0.00008573125,0.00037104645,0.116831616,0.00023473022,0.00021318992,0.007159594,0.0014602627,0.000815569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133274225,0.00011655309,0.09764746,0.000005561783,0.00007689769,0.000041153737,0.00036675972,0.00039640354,0.000026689813,0.0021584113,0.36472377,0.534427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035784693,0.00007865706,0.60556036,0.00004233195,0.00002228712,0.000025562842,0.0019723934,0.007256495,0.00031841543,0.16254616,0.22146702,0.0003524663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023757256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016007615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53407454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011481528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077802234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415106985","doi":"10.7554/elife.109042.1","title":"The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding—a replication study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Setback; Citation; Replicate; Robustness (evolution); Grant funding; Replication (statistics)","score_opus":0.7559407351846971,"score_gpt":0.6772689483475417,"score_spread":0.07867178683715537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415106985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986708,0.001628578,0.000057235764,0.0028089052,0.00020769144,0.0008765095,0.0000022336967,0.000013595071,0.0076972856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917518,0.00018470915,0.000022077591,0.000052489868,0.000032078646,0.00009098794,3.2850056e-7,0.000005225466,0.007860304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878545,0.0015907623,0.00059368653,0.00094330555,0.008321175,0.0006965647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97653496,0.01983723,0.00007536688,0.001618519,0.001754517,0.00017942351],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14195263,0.00009113653,0.00020389147,0.029738285,0.00066214136,0.003330272,0.001935796,0.00007356818,0.00003214688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086968295,0.00004966002,0.000043366468,0.1501054,0.00020908602,0.00021331769,0.0012806389,0.000488524,0.00021709193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031890024,0.000061551866,0.86568636,0.000002269617,0.0000064953606,0.0000037129519,0.00016952043,0.0000013803245,0.000097832635,0.00082061306,0.016048025,0.11707035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040731175,0.00025860468,0.9676972,0.000009174096,0.0000015844315,5.5527147e-7,0.0008611777,0.00040151796,0.00033416646,0.003179291,0.02679594,0.000053473337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036816896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013840817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12036711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012514876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415107005","doi":"10.7554/elife.109042","title":"The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding—a replication study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eLife","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Setback; Citation; Replicate; Robustness (evolution); Grant funding; Replication (statistics)","score_opus":0.7559407351846971,"score_gpt":0.6772689483475417,"score_spread":0.07867178683715537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415107005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986708,0.001628578,0.000057235764,0.0028089052,0.00020769144,0.0008765095,0.0000022336967,0.000013595071,0.0076972856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917518,0.00018470915,0.000022077591,0.000052489868,0.000032078646,0.00009098794,3.2850056e-7,0.000005225466,0.007860304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878545,0.0015907623,0.00059368653,0.00094330555,0.008321175,0.0006965647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97653496,0.01983723,0.00007536688,0.001618519,0.001754517,0.00017942351],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14195263,0.00009113653,0.00020389147,0.029738285,0.00066214136,0.003330272,0.001935796,0.00007356818,0.00003214688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086968295,0.00004966002,0.000043366468,0.1501054,0.00020908602,0.00021331769,0.0012806389,0.000488524,0.00021709193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031890024,0.000061551866,0.86568636,0.000002269617,0.0000064953606,0.0000037129519,0.00016952043,0.0000013803245,0.000097832635,0.00082061306,0.016048025,0.11707035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040731175,0.00025860468,0.9676972,0.000009174096,0.0000015844315,5.5527147e-7,0.0008611777,0.00040151796,0.00033416646,0.003179291,0.02679594,0.000053473337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036816896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013840817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12036711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012514876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415154849","doi":"10.46747/cfp.7110e244","title":"Author ordering and citation-based measures of scholarly impact","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Family Physician","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health; McMaster University; Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Rank (graph theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Convention; Citation analysis; Citation impact","score_opus":0.4584742008578115,"score_gpt":0.5016353420099522,"score_spread":0.0431611411521407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415154849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146546,0.0022519946,0.003020373,0.0018785115,0.00035402487,0.00024611657,0.00015100681,0.000014425718,0.077428944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439704,0.000007023202,0.00031177254,0.00470521,0.000021705144,0.000005156443,0.0000033869535,0.000006708324,0.0005419964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963282,0.00012212637,0.0003596516,0.00040170597,0.0023423259,0.00044598925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501634,0.0012865507,0.00010417113,0.0004744723,0.00252857,0.0005899088],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004821692,0.0001167857,0.00024998753,0.045884352,0.00024996905,0.002180827,0.00093641464,0.000079839374,0.000008590266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074642226,0.0000931258,0.00010560794,0.097225234,0.00014854509,0.0006844079,0.00006982818,0.00019421928,0.000028410388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016956601,0.00004546194,0.076424256,0.00001557677,0.000052689087,0.000008695246,0.00008472943,0.0005032087,0.012927837,0.004461005,0.04882002,0.85663956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039247854,0.000092638365,0.92944,0.000036898553,0.000009546934,6.9111174e-8,0.0006943568,0.009105777,0.0012365149,0.012157686,0.046655167,0.00017882523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021988222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057727126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85646075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023321946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022220463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415212644","doi":"10.4000/14xuz","title":"Relire les revues québécoises","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Institution; General interest; Periodization","score_opus":0.18297232167943475,"score_gpt":0.37487516280208144,"score_spread":0.1919028411226467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415212644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021435805,0.10380448,0.0018655953,0.0027866533,0.0007970956,0.00054947805,0.00042837913,0.00012467329,0.8682079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01914671,0.024499482,0.002737619,0.00035680362,0.00045270578,0.000016475677,0.00007164446,0.0000987792,0.9526198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720306,0.0010565044,0.0010633264,0.0019663144,0.0067084627,0.002002359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839672,0.007836057,0.00078757916,0.0019461218,0.0038146675,0.0016484141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005589024,0.0008236703,0.0012508013,0.02268529,0.0018662941,0.0026215313,0.0053316555,0.0013814489,0.019006994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010958032,0.0007990174,0.0009861047,0.015297751,0.0010375887,0.0004334875,0.0059735365,0.0015622888,0.0008306818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025429437,0.00019279929,0.024307234,0.0003039197,0.00036292567,0.0052123927,0.0020488603,0.0002870911,0.0015257987,0.009006686,0.4947772,0.4617208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007811111,0.00025335615,0.021483347,0.00044934137,0.00026043502,0.0003525411,0.0014438332,0.0019977419,0.0018191361,0.0086015705,0.9616702,0.00088734285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031349406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020188943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46689302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039949096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028114775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415360119","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.155832.2","title":"Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Perception; Open science; Protocol (science); Open peer review; Massive open online course; Graduate students; Open data; Preprint","score_opus":0.9479692848096105,"score_gpt":0.7782260764395977,"score_spread":0.16974320837001278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415360119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82490367,0.0017004292,0.000131877,0.010384888,0.0012536494,0.01186535,0.00035320787,0.00008828737,0.14931864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92301613,0.0008841775,0.003288467,0.00016445143,0.00024195881,0.0012657759,0.000010456378,0.000055942357,0.071072645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86400604,0.01368693,0.002856184,0.009224446,0.10529793,0.0049284883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7970627,0.08301832,0.0014385254,0.01188999,0.10362444,0.0029660505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53597844,0.000531726,0.0011701378,0.2145123,0.0039040085,0.07919924,0.059312083,0.00052049925,0.0007975684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68403435,0.00040505172,0.00014425954,0.34488538,0.0038071803,0.0032377625,0.41908514,0.0063845855,0.00048301698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031625025,0.0042019864,0.15253454,0.000468707,0.0002228725,0.0006633521,0.008665497,0.00011991629,0.008371126,0.004502578,0.10086114,0.7162258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038970741,0.0059634713,0.64756376,0.00082694885,0.00005345464,0.00004273815,0.03784709,0.03349748,0.0033727626,0.15386422,0.11116617,0.0019048474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012526058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001095179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71432096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014796141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033559326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984014},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415488869","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2024","title":"Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Biomedical sciences; Human science; Impact factor","score_opus":0.3545117205238558,"score_gpt":0.5962054485031559,"score_spread":0.2416937279793001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415488869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77637255,0.0050648097,0.00089246687,0.21322457,0.0010470191,0.0001995833,0.000014741493,0.000002949535,0.003181332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660707,0.00092140574,0.000088784924,0.0015568734,0.00015652677,0.0000010131406,2.5907661e-7,0.0000023815073,0.0006657107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814297,0.0037022152,0.0016204872,0.00015201837,0.012767392,0.00032818152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682972,0.026510986,0.0033802495,0.00039101334,0.0012013172,0.00021923218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12823614,0.000075442054,0.00031640526,0.012088595,0.0004255431,0.0014260847,0.004608341,0.000098857265,0.00048412755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13513643,0.000025825635,0.00041684837,0.10345039,0.00020098251,0.0013079507,0.00034565016,0.000849087,0.0000033811275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017169305,0.000090230766,0.83257526,0.0000030682447,0.000041326257,0.0000017247424,0.00039648567,0.0002219643,0.000013665094,0.0007813813,0.13865915,0.027198585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295137,0.00016129823,0.9680702,0.00010175011,0.0000063290886,0.0000072644007,0.0008250229,0.0021516075,0.00003432058,0.024019709,0.004262577,0.000030401934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028941824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051395195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22023451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024092697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029893566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961054},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415545158","doi":"10.59350/r4ve4-72d31","title":"A Gentle Introduction to Open Science","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Open science; Open source","score_opus":0.5769162129397973,"score_gpt":0.6528775600575992,"score_spread":0.07596134711780189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415545158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09066922,0.0010164699,0.09170104,0.17418467,0.015870057,0.0030361717,0.000028473394,0.000043956123,0.6234499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67582184,0.00020715213,0.009421944,0.0027747517,0.0004359458,0.000039800252,7.9138573e-7,0.000008171884,0.3112896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97830325,0.00023038505,0.001237865,0.003235154,0.015346026,0.001647295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813464,0.0017014315,0.00018112609,0.003129796,0.012164394,0.0014768223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.087861806,0.00025470034,0.0004897575,0.25268435,0.0019450485,0.048098464,0.030265056,0.0001281745,0.012968216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12703641,0.00018905838,0.00012998185,0.79142535,0.0010657627,0.0033400974,0.031654682,0.00037048347,0.0071943398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000471687,0.00024948246,0.0040526926,0.0000043032483,0.000010117435,0.0000023402797,0.00008349111,0.00005604593,0.0062479153,0.04456063,0.45285255,0.49183327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005110364,0.00032058044,0.03806228,0.00001855965,0.000009235342,0.0000030657106,0.001075342,0.007601831,0.024692189,0.011792461,0.9156116,0.00030178198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074479356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052620595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5851526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008780497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005220458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415557426","doi":"10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-3/8","title":"Exploring state and institutional support for sustainable scholarly journal publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; National Research Foundation of Ukraine","keywords":"Publishing; Metadata; Sustainability; Work (physics); Thematic analysis; State (computer science); Publication; Scopus; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.753793795492117,"score_gpt":0.5918767500626817,"score_spread":0.1619170454294353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415557426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8884889,0.017670048,0.046317704,0.024570832,0.006584525,0.0002217159,0.000025223535,0.000006446774,0.01611461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579538,0.01612325,0.0065825586,0.0004918881,0.00059891236,0.00001165671,7.955508e-7,0.0000062173194,0.018230898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373424,0.00007382313,0.0010508656,0.00019776078,0.004629261,0.00031407466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959139,0.0033468762,0.00066494575,0.0001015286,0.0365649,0.0001827633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027565882,0.00009742421,0.0002911554,0.029455543,0.0006488344,0.014926913,0.0014445933,0.00003218866,0.00005361188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17369305,0.00006328782,0.00016659602,0.014269685,0.00015181073,0.017542653,0.00071770546,0.0004707457,0.000004062727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004839358,0.00023374196,0.1481638,0.00004885649,0.0013390912,0.00037382057,0.001210682,0.00064107473,0.00036366668,0.053349696,0.30596897,0.48782268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019184559,0.00034745267,0.13690503,0.00009695311,0.000021851447,0.0002754901,0.011276571,0.00038622215,0.00044918736,0.10332698,0.74486077,0.00013506539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000080266145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033026524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48768762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004659461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000636057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415593269","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0335366","title":"Citation proximus: The role of social and semantic ties on citations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Consortium For Research and Innovation In Aerospace In Quebec; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Prestige; Citation; Centrality; Similarity (geometry); Diversity (politics); Citation analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.5616652540900196,"score_gpt":0.5165137099977491,"score_spread":0.0451515440922704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415593269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768366,0.00035778948,0.00019570463,0.0037554249,0.000031345753,0.00021252446,0.000011909182,0.000007609519,0.018591095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972365,0.00004126745,0.0003474112,0.00008475156,0.000018224739,0.000014315071,0.0000010526614,0.0000020636335,0.0022544125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964135,0.000116482595,0.00024281205,0.00018643754,0.0029083777,0.00013238392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951766,0.0032849084,0.00008983219,0.00018656488,0.0012287166,0.00003334346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003878446,0.000044656925,0.00012631065,0.014125777,0.00024722362,0.0004404499,0.0004459212,0.00003677971,0.000069655405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014892863,0.000026571664,0.000031571235,0.054347605,0.00014476103,0.00012320452,0.00013060764,0.00009617712,0.00003238578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011505452,0.0033029967,0.30638242,0.00011309058,0.0003455659,0.0000012750446,0.007644209,0.000017945813,0.06160291,0.32826445,0.010547297,0.2816628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038000883,0.00020406046,0.69492304,0.000047705093,0.000041598752,1.1890783e-7,0.0059189913,0.008843678,0.024586054,0.26309142,0.0018635887,0.00009971414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021409222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010383585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38854063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016444488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006211616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99704826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415675665","doi":"10.21627/15dgxd54","title":"It Is Time to Bring Scholarly Publishing Back to the Academic Community","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Reviews of Economic Literature","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Academic community; Electronic publishing; Scholarly communication; Unintended consequences; Open access publishing; Access to information","score_opus":0.4978743413785195,"score_gpt":0.5478047137906095,"score_spread":0.049930372412089974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415675665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04235139,0.38565698,0.0004976474,0.3665941,0.0034470109,0.005255675,0.0012369754,0.000020597554,0.19493961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08344865,0.19405574,0.0063145594,0.26804096,0.0019223278,0.00014562898,0.00008689703,0.00012741216,0.44585782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870402,0.0032096345,0.004156596,0.0015375519,0.0027148912,0.0013410929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98259574,0.0076559274,0.00105444,0.0042649196,0.003388476,0.0010405076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10798161,0.00052708783,0.0017186794,0.04066268,0.00083457085,0.055375326,0.017095925,0.00073361804,0.009342643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09763728,0.0003473709,0.00079628284,0.16160984,0.00016307595,0.012178013,0.007123751,0.005374664,0.031697836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024412167,0.00004349606,0.0013154382,0.0001749911,0.000043888293,6.3515745e-7,0.0022924133,0.000034315224,0.00020266444,0.0003078688,0.776579,0.21898086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002698582,0.00012086825,0.002136495,0.0024364747,0.000027031696,0.000004331879,0.00020986768,0.00082567154,0.0002245333,0.0011598796,0.9922652,0.00031977214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114628616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003072992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2509182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006961206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008292721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415747150","doi":"10.1177/02666669251389935","title":"Involvement of China and its close partners in the international open access movement: Quantitative analysis and benchmarking approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Development","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); China; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Quarter (Canadian coin); Evaluation methods","score_opus":0.48051295636738117,"score_gpt":0.5793673417651911,"score_spread":0.09885438539780994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415747150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491059,0.0001549931,0.017364014,0.0011511771,0.000105807936,0.00060758344,0.000013271296,0.0000030589003,0.031494167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945302,0.00015861157,0.0045688725,0.00052661117,0.0000021477892,0.00005592587,0.000031882417,7.7553295e-7,0.00012499272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631613,0.00008411117,0.0007854036,0.00019910933,0.0024659578,0.00014927117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.0006008864,0.0002875725,0.00016471819,0.0006581447,0.00004713578],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013805169,0.00007683187,0.0001770394,0.024801338,0.00013573926,0.0035808673,0.0021317317,0.000030044572,0.000061847175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002170837,0.000047673948,0.000025032807,0.053130735,0.000041919848,0.002774523,0.0020917614,0.00008312679,0.0000029603493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050548795,0.00014544159,0.6525993,0.00003752028,0.00027989093,5.67085e-7,0.016279241,0.00082711916,0.00001884569,0.04712677,0.0021981208,0.2804367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040194145,0.000015385007,0.9326924,0.000011504914,0.000008120103,1.3497564e-7,0.0034367584,0.053417094,0.00030688234,0.0022075863,0.0074360813,0.0000660834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013082742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007653722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2803706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082185376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018810548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415777098","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/dmgex_v1","title":"Open Science, Closed Peer Review?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Publishing; Data sharing; Open data; Open science; Freedom of information; Identifiability","score_opus":0.851523223465649,"score_gpt":0.7155276012480258,"score_spread":0.13599562221762318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415777098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008900084,0.006809504,0.0021649466,0.037489213,0.0032918046,0.002045336,0.00021092477,0.00004920395,0.9470491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023172783,0.008768906,0.011389989,0.006975828,0.00014197765,0.00014914009,0.000036064856,0.000012710229,0.9493526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93823653,0.00038972628,0.0017024227,0.0032678458,0.055301867,0.0011016134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92291635,0.0051991716,0.0008142072,0.007135096,0.06279751,0.0011376572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2274453,0.000336637,0.0010631157,0.14464717,0.00060221564,0.02980269,0.067702904,0.00028852932,0.00814842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3449046,0.00020776215,0.00036650652,0.45717978,0.00074647466,0.001040631,0.11423423,0.0012074492,0.0018907815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038731196,0.00007521608,0.0019506124,0.000073591575,0.000008984166,0.0000053470617,0.000012670707,0.000008164599,0.000015172303,0.0063866703,0.8389624,0.1524973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022434417,0.000034268578,0.011438447,0.00042884794,0.000014162533,0.0000017826757,0.000052479514,0.0019013926,0.0003075706,0.060899522,0.92433923,0.00035794664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057888596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000295257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3125326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037680328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077116396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415886325","doi":"10.36591/se-4101-17","title":"Editor Decision Support Tools","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Editor","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; White paper; Decision support system; Profiling (computer programming); Identification (biology); Associate editor; White (mutation); Percentile rank","score_opus":0.4304795340927844,"score_gpt":0.5844958447822689,"score_spread":0.15401631068948451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415886325","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13109428,0.00004638625,0.018467214,0.0018570222,0.7780328,0.00047035678,0.00007866617,0.00013501734,0.06981826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6237853,0.00002292816,0.010906865,0.00050081697,0.3584368,0.000017102628,0.0000021109363,0.00001798516,0.006310079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652608,0.00008350571,0.00079523295,0.0015308864,0.03097635,0.0013532324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782732,0.005866934,0.00028825412,0.0019309915,0.0122787,0.0013619058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054723587,0.00019724829,0.0003000974,0.041658886,0.0013285077,0.009659046,0.009398663,0.00015076285,0.006274623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17789812,0.00012802191,0.00014393053,0.23623748,0.0031705897,0.0040413598,0.0020808538,0.00029455882,0.013680589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132220275,0.000047140187,0.004847615,4.2461713e-7,9.897384e-7,0.0000043680084,0.000060939106,5.6736565e-7,0.0024020968,0.00023228065,0.7952627,0.19712767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002412352,0.00048182305,0.020719917,0.0000047432713,0.0000016874608,0.0000060888656,0.0002014657,0.0014170192,0.0056691635,0.005997917,0.9650474,0.00021151041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017899412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008357019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49269104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024180129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016226149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415899068","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09696-y","title":"Academic Cronyism and Publication in Journal Special Issues: an Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Tsinghua University","keywords":"Cronyism; Exploratory research; Reciprocal; Citation; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Publishing; Equity (law); Impact factor","score_opus":0.7124622079667812,"score_gpt":0.6626968449371432,"score_spread":0.049765363029637966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415899068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95505214,0.006154464,0.0009772072,0.034719285,0.0018875136,0.00022381697,0.0000031669863,0.000006291893,0.00097610947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784048,0.015421092,0.0005169414,0.001626889,0.0027608448,0.000002911982,4.0569904e-7,0.0000125989045,0.0012534704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98391587,0.0021939322,0.0027943058,0.0004677414,0.010094456,0.00053371536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98277324,0.0071031987,0.0014538502,0.0003975693,0.0076590534,0.0006130554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16184552,0.00017165353,0.00052474893,0.06003019,0.000366308,0.0016227989,0.0033796187,0.0009190139,0.00013880788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15477401,0.00012215356,0.00010495307,0.06470926,0.0002778191,0.0036173018,0.00059049536,0.013756087,0.000022490876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023987144,0.00050160894,0.64564097,0.000017793414,0.00005878337,0.000105233645,0.029100223,0.00008194243,0.0012358268,0.0055245385,0.098929286,0.21856393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038022927,0.0013946617,0.47033674,0.00023049381,0.00004635461,0.0002876647,0.06413088,0.0010349556,0.00041461704,0.20861289,0.24929486,0.00041360204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007749487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027219909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21815033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003041868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018919759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415963683","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05454-4","title":"Exploring citation behavior of national self-references","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; China Association for Science and Technology","keywords":"Scarcity; Diversification (marketing strategy); Citation; Norm (philosophy); Scientific communication; Scientific literature; Process (computing); Citation analysis","score_opus":0.9021341018802934,"score_gpt":0.6353747233350729,"score_spread":0.26675937854522047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415963683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445034,0.00048809196,0.0051457994,0.00029339036,0.0021146338,0.00029332392,0.000045143996,0.000053872544,0.04706232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933284,0.00022687599,0.004123298,0.000062128136,0.00003659438,0.000052040272,0.0000046964137,0.0000052344535,0.0021607112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.977176,0.00017827883,0.0009974019,0.0007611617,0.020352291,0.00053485157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97846484,0.006223836,0.00038878236,0.0005898213,0.014047294,0.00028543413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035325885,0.00014516068,0.00031364223,0.30197138,0.00028975127,0.0014558379,0.0027081121,0.00008786057,0.00022962842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09542064,0.000110957604,0.00016684853,0.6710516,0.00020678963,0.0014334747,0.0006702067,0.0002096313,0.00016715277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013803305,0.0007082309,0.60989475,0.000022860902,0.000031537693,0.0000032128714,0.00046674686,0.00012362843,0.0018990248,0.036331072,0.008715275,0.34178984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004929491,0.00012400521,0.9564057,0.000015417325,0.000013739445,0.0000012996403,0.0007169114,0.0026593816,0.0069878306,0.0112402495,0.021148512,0.00019397971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039603172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060099815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36908025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002837151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007206229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958074},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4415966073","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05467-z","title":"Research evaluation metrics comparison: does citation or citation context count differ from citation context similarity metric?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Weighting; Citation analysis; Metric (unit); Rank (graph theory)","score_opus":0.7775964114144409,"score_gpt":0.6498567782278969,"score_spread":0.12773963318654402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415966073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83331746,0.009150801,0.12861688,0.004444565,0.009397165,0.0036922796,0.00075615064,0.00019881885,0.010425891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893134,0.0005486813,0.003297392,0.0007480381,0.00024301819,0.00021491655,0.0003036454,0.00004132524,0.005289548],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91566736,0.005294491,0.003926734,0.003721192,0.06891334,0.0024768908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7973707,0.11136612,0.0018848148,0.0033820663,0.08443266,0.0015636894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17903253,0.00063522917,0.0013299187,0.40338805,0.0021548683,0.012124805,0.005414058,0.0007547828,0.0022627285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5252329,0.00042713582,0.00044258236,0.7771955,0.0010150763,0.0028778382,0.0015759665,0.0016446108,0.0009677044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034318052,0.0009901978,0.19776839,0.00003753059,0.00012919048,0.000010143468,0.0016137064,0.0004229377,0.0005629576,0.006156327,0.08596887,0.7059966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044994703,0.0006619761,0.5980206,0.00009208247,0.00015662822,0.0000016197276,0.021659508,0.23769788,0.0041778637,0.05553897,0.076635644,0.00085771695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001550698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013418221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70513886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035694921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024472033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023714","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23101","title":"Legislating Open Access: Making the Case for a Secondary Publishing Right in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Public access; Path (computing); Compliance (psychology); Human rights","score_opus":0.5186037205800953,"score_gpt":0.5866201866187247,"score_spread":0.06801646603862943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64412653,0.0064946264,0.0049819853,0.15232377,0.010447962,0.0017036938,0.00005041119,0.000006565416,0.17986448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352914,0.000028284763,0.0023085775,0.0024774603,0.00023042639,0.00003216877,0.000002075165,0.000008428963,0.0013834336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948062,0.00061594724,0.0017152644,0.0003582055,0.00205791,0.00044652974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794721,0.01636392,0.0012530353,0.0006054787,0.0020968304,0.00020862932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025920069,0.000130578,0.0003801384,0.027848037,0.00034026822,0.029134339,0.0085840095,0.00008912686,0.00080038555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03802019,0.00007854734,0.00009435479,0.08402626,0.000052714746,0.016230863,0.0010185416,0.00087040674,0.0000015012656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087026565,0.00014720709,0.22804004,0.00002347559,0.000017248276,0.00018418304,0.00056291424,0.0001298184,0.0000062520144,0.021075536,0.53614193,0.21358436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014863915,0.00004839453,0.2597052,0.00032665548,0.0000112301195,0.00031089052,0.011515055,0.0053308457,0.00018408672,0.35299093,0.367873,0.00021733588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22306211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5149447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34940264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009759297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036425594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416167779","doi":"10.22330/001c.147268","title":"An Index of Her Own: An Investigation of the Proportion of Women Indexed in Evolutionary Psychology Textbooks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Ethology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Northumbria University","keywords":"Index (typography); Evolutionary psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Descriptive statistics; Gender bias","score_opus":0.45484510780618015,"score_gpt":0.5998921077014874,"score_spread":0.14504699989530723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416167779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968291,0.00008293222,0.00055158755,0.0002762045,0.00018386047,0.00024753652,0.0000055821106,0.000005431351,0.0018177449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991961,0.000006455732,0.00023725064,0.00014201376,0.000011152815,0.000017924996,0.0000033012852,0.000004089724,0.0003816907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995322,0.0011598895,0.0010062329,0.00043651712,0.00176903,0.00030632035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649805,0.0005089112,0.0005644164,0.00088219845,0.0014599387,0.000086512235],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014414543,0.00008396326,0.00034532842,0.024251275,0.00007761608,0.000026819029,0.0014361285,0.00024518953,0.00021472924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003567717,0.00005603607,0.00005763428,0.039930604,0.0011754752,0.00023882395,0.00026964396,0.00027235603,0.0000030572921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004527236,0.00019339498,0.92161745,0.0000113051265,0.0000052767746,8.307113e-7,0.0010642535,0.0000485627,0.055801783,0.007853738,0.00020450988,0.013153617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003796995,0.0003216512,0.8451841,0.0000084722005,0.0000016235848,0.0000015157498,0.00039687924,0.0002779902,0.0028587074,0.15044987,0.000079384066,0.000040116225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013411514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012412551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14259614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010256846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002965584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416207390","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.056","title":"EVALUATION OF THE CONVERSION RATE OF ABSTRACTS AND “E-POSTERS” FROM THE 2016 CANADIAN ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION CONGRESS INTO SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Traumatology; Work (physics); Citation; Web of science; MEDLINE; Public health; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1827137128253735,"score_gpt":0.433249726845699,"score_spread":0.25053601402032555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416207390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98880863,0.0010141942,0.000010706121,0.0055217324,0.0012635567,0.00047977822,0.00004604066,0.000006431826,0.002848942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866647,0.000090569556,0.000031292442,0.00017606051,0.000033122404,0.000010372617,0.0000031780596,0.0000047695858,0.0009841665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911318,0.00025415045,0.0007795164,0.00052835746,0.0069259917,0.0003801874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98399526,0.0031038949,0.0008709155,0.00040089985,0.01139052,0.00023850141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06307577,0.000118130825,0.0002271651,0.0077172793,0.00058097654,0.0010246729,0.001227433,0.00013144313,0.00013780886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0718178,0.00006414935,0.0001254579,0.04493871,0.00052297424,0.00055052683,0.00042197056,0.0002220159,0.00001639992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018641551,0.000030367408,0.8890901,0.000014486406,0.00004183076,2.9339247e-7,0.0008601764,0.0000054275256,0.0049471767,0.00029740404,0.028478647,0.07621545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092063146,0.000037302918,0.955946,0.00013028288,0.00011734832,5.788642e-7,0.0026003595,0.006656563,0.012337809,0.010945562,0.010211449,0.00009607755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01908533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010011609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07611937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00173958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416417179","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18110658","title":"The Rise of the Chaebol: A Bibliometric Analysis of Business Groups in South Korea","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Multinational corporation; Chaebol; Corporate group; Bibliometrics; International business","score_opus":0.1198007607569318,"score_gpt":0.4251282925885518,"score_spread":0.30532753183162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416417179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97683793,0.0059165573,0.015477294,0.00030115107,0.00047105955,0.00016324339,0.000021491602,9.4238345e-7,0.0008103349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907729,0.008822542,0.00015933363,0.000018401379,0.000020804679,0.000001946027,9.632868e-8,0.0000022258246,0.0002017482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945315,0.00024262827,0.0012036696,0.00020590256,0.003572376,0.00024392357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941742,0.0020831488,0.0011205804,0.00046719177,0.0020882252,0.00006666902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020140389,0.00009429151,0.00049051514,0.46702537,0.00020279876,0.0003357575,0.0017543435,0.00005493226,0.000010497841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017028594,0.000043447326,0.00030493198,0.8606788,0.0002540786,0.00016539014,0.0007833524,0.00023020401,7.542062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068437475,0.00008939469,0.56496,0.000010422187,0.00007434262,0.0000048196343,0.0001658427,0.00037427354,0.000004439255,0.002568,0.00044568867,0.4312343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004943634,0.000044051565,0.9812996,0.000027907465,0.00019985362,4.0743572e-7,0.000557819,0.0010632082,0.0000239122,0.0066414764,0.009604681,0.00004275335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011782114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000967333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43119156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040108636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010379837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416544889","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.12134","title":"APC waivers and Ukraine's publishing output in Gold OA journals: Evidence from five commercial publishers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Institutional repository (Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Ukrainian; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Web of science; Period (music)","score_opus":0.36019456859411264,"score_gpt":0.417624501012277,"score_spread":0.05742993241816435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416544889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8138523,0.004508877,0.008043938,0.0050037215,0.0062990715,0.0019180479,0.0024114007,0.00037728454,0.15758537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386256,0.0023543579,0.0025872204,0.00030961397,0.0008416383,0.0000042844363,0.00030201577,0.000049121707,0.054926198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996974,0.0025223582,0.0018042249,0.0042356937,0.009640165,0.0018278396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780592,0.008095528,0.0019474956,0.0027068888,0.007085961,0.0021049299],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010651348,0.0013015216,0.001924781,0.061741658,0.0025668002,0.010696586,0.011966726,0.0022215152,0.00026605788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019178854,0.0014449741,0.0010525543,0.05235491,0.0024285952,0.014143561,0.016258905,0.005671824,0.00007399958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033749954,0.002057724,0.73405814,0.0005215848,0.0020825027,0.018577017,0.0058335178,0.032261174,0.0004989327,0.033212416,0.12407475,0.043447226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059191594,0.0002500463,0.5686276,0.0020206163,0.00061796134,0.00010561674,0.014766721,0.011336656,0.00015800598,0.0041324953,0.38902265,0.0030424723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020681009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024444438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2649479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077451905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007552141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416572938","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s544374","title":"Global Trends in Neurosurgical Nursing Research from 2014 to 2024: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Modalities; Visualization; Nursing research; Web of science; Citation; Nursing literature","score_opus":0.5223343024529562,"score_gpt":0.6799909173537998,"score_spread":0.1576566149008436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416572938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796177,0.0048176507,0.00079318153,0.01217838,0.0013018573,0.00039509576,0.000057153797,0.0000071594236,0.0008318188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984576,0.0003646525,0.0005198114,0.00006525259,0.00014193974,0.000006621331,0.0000017812959,0.000009156191,0.00043316028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843303,0.0024704228,0.0019392985,0.0008627813,0.009595027,0.0008021732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987259,0.005461736,0.0003911272,0.0005831465,0.005370779,0.0009342161],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037839632,0.00018740153,0.0006674875,0.55732757,0.00045666096,0.0014317911,0.0016480736,0.00017629367,0.00011941783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017222077,0.00013600859,0.00013221665,0.786361,0.00014918174,0.0006476323,0.0011097057,0.00078076764,0.00002143428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002838811,0.00078938046,0.66747814,0.0000058554097,0.000007352263,0.00015951668,0.00066041976,0.000102768776,0.000027591708,0.00018680625,0.012112014,0.3181863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014455089,0.0017292241,0.9792611,0.00014396118,0.00000595049,0.000019481007,0.0076778685,0.0026924186,0.00000579933,0.0062388526,0.0006706941,0.00010911685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069154595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005829561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31807718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082363596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005698687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416610982","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.17518.r37491","title":"Referee report. For: What is a predatory journal? A scoping review [version 2; referees: 3 approved]","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.5906445318476334,"score_gpt":0.6109775974599683,"score_spread":0.020333065612334833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416610982","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15714543,0.39899805,0.024694929,0.26984066,0.006149807,0.02089293,0.002754098,0.0002967398,0.11922736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1136657,0.40305203,0.026092663,0.003548308,0.0031142847,0.00052110077,0.00050452835,0.00025118116,0.4492502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97006583,0.0011830387,0.0019912997,0.0013180288,0.024004407,0.0014374044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9198211,0.0065534892,0.0011301198,0.0028483248,0.068445146,0.0012018363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13779032,0.00024684006,0.0008273843,0.027721338,0.0010855377,0.0036317357,0.004947507,0.00026884585,0.0031439718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14927995,0.0001655041,0.00046238708,0.07667767,0.0009554105,0.002477781,0.00189481,0.0009571584,0.001043838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011548641,0.00014852309,0.0010192471,0.00095055404,0.000038321643,0.00003729711,0.00021637755,3.0285182e-7,0.0012127783,0.00012749399,0.8870799,0.10905374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076527975,0.0011987052,0.0006439439,0.014982735,0.000012305807,0.00012424734,0.0014513691,0.00024039314,0.0062112124,0.005156284,0.9689438,0.00026973168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008596758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006602629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33002284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003802977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018632957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4416633903","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.159997.r234926","title":"Referee report. For: Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research [version 2; peer review: 5 approved]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"The Internet; Peer review; Access to information; Public access; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.88718950269657,"score_gpt":0.719627061075853,"score_spread":0.1675624416207171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416633903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018656548,0.34556222,0.005067262,0.5124477,0.0014191921,0.0145173,0.004764531,0.00008464197,0.09748058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28350523,0.40490657,0.017259365,0.0007414065,0.00037058248,0.0005699856,0.00057039724,0.00016189761,0.29191455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88601685,0.0033884787,0.0043443306,0.0026502954,0.101057895,0.002542159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6237119,0.029340575,0.0017454788,0.0058152173,0.33791786,0.0014690117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4918946,0.00025034152,0.0012669114,0.06796477,0.0008384875,0.0118619995,0.024491457,0.00017578846,0.0016697957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6467315,0.00016400078,0.0005082769,0.30900696,0.0030319714,0.007627867,0.018716006,0.001583556,0.000101795595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293481,0.00020772908,0.0022926424,0.008933021,0.00003624358,0.00005484024,0.00005167867,0.0000014520556,0.0041191103,0.0048629995,0.9180021,0.06137519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023234554,0.0003522109,0.002119815,0.021117544,0.000012500788,0.000050690236,0.00019275717,0.0006355526,0.004065922,0.0046387096,0.9664068,0.00017510343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010378794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061877545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5117063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068927766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071189543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416633904","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.159997.r234928","title":"Referee report. For: Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Access research [version 2; peer review: 5 approved]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"The Internet; Peer review; Access to information; Public access; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.88718950269657,"score_gpt":0.719627061075853,"score_spread":0.1675624416207171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416633904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018656548,0.34556222,0.005067262,0.5124477,0.0014191921,0.0145173,0.004764531,0.00008464197,0.09748058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28350523,0.40490657,0.017259365,0.0007414065,0.00037058248,0.0005699856,0.00057039724,0.00016189761,0.29191455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88601685,0.0033884787,0.0043443306,0.0026502954,0.101057895,0.002542159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6237119,0.029340575,0.0017454788,0.0058152173,0.33791786,0.0014690117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4918946,0.00025034152,0.0012669114,0.06796477,0.0008384875,0.0118619995,0.024491457,0.00017578846,0.0016697957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6467315,0.00016400078,0.0005082769,0.30900696,0.0030319714,0.007627867,0.018716006,0.001583556,0.000101795595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293481,0.00020772908,0.0022926424,0.008933021,0.00003624358,0.00005484024,0.00005167867,0.0000014520556,0.0041191103,0.0048629995,0.9180021,0.06137519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023234554,0.0003522109,0.002119815,0.021117544,0.000012500788,0.000050690236,0.00019275717,0.0006355526,0.004065922,0.0046387096,0.9664068,0.00017510343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010378794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061877545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5117063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068927766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071189543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416794742","doi":"","title":"Les revues scientifiques à l’épreuve du capitalisme académique : le cas d’une revue classée en sciences de gestion","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.24520878825290415,"score_gpt":0.45073043982805955,"score_spread":0.2055216515751554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416794742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3572216,0.019193266,0.18841302,0.2713008,0.001680054,0.00084118143,0.00015245445,0.00024026814,0.16095734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7735306,0.00716009,0.032948248,0.00032121298,0.00010697271,0.00007068355,0.000050887946,0.000040785413,0.18577053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96832013,0.022146337,0.0016817353,0.0023935004,0.0037682708,0.0016900451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489511,0.032291777,0.00091053423,0.0029030894,0.0140704475,0.0008730112],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13060527,0.0005753108,0.00077557,0.017930986,0.00332474,0.0074738665,0.0066992356,0.000995568,0.0006232657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107644446,0.0005749196,0.00049327494,0.08391818,0.0034395552,0.001808215,0.0029113751,0.0015264864,0.00022507049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020844775,0.0010880962,0.03550556,0.000223949,0.000069967355,0.00004013404,0.016969388,0.00018871728,0.006134838,0.62268215,0.023282113,0.29379424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00192714,0.000015369851,0.18335192,0.0069083506,0.00015038857,0.00019929753,0.006945273,0.1801156,0.114653476,0.12577431,0.3782191,0.0017397858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034936324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011951669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49690786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001223245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027919863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416852871","doi":"10.59350/6e6rb-tx842","title":"Regional Feature: Canada's Leadership in Diamond Open Access","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Access to information; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8813629746207113,"score_gpt":0.6315672608982018,"score_spread":0.24979571372250953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416852871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03410412,0.021023864,0.001416704,0.44098198,0.005516997,0.002497344,0.000119348486,0.00001996177,0.49431968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7005692,0.0009289034,0.00026325425,0.0120369615,0.00005714996,0.000033381188,0.0000067713404,0.000011040765,0.28609332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807497,0.00068532425,0.0013032799,0.0021477384,0.013048928,0.0020650122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833741,0.010663084,0.00030109193,0.0017089414,0.0030311726,0.0009215856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026713345,0.00039247272,0.0008039781,0.11934432,0.0005555683,0.03903199,0.030966988,0.0003821862,0.006005896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03380599,0.000299119,0.00016219952,0.56780463,0.00041409486,0.0035982449,0.014560017,0.0011529993,0.00011619522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007028964,0.00016493598,0.1857572,0.0000212304,0.000021259066,0.00007347139,0.000025492061,0.000029387431,0.0000113504675,0.0056351097,0.6873275,0.120862745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012125022,0.000047553312,0.51280946,0.00010620768,0.000006749629,0.0000028700897,0.0017447756,0.003987445,0.0003586474,0.0063409256,0.47300628,0.0003766009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8441877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94728273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014498903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020399028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416852874","doi":"10.59350/bpmd7-jjp45","title":"Regional Feature: Canada's Leadership in Diamond Open Access","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Access to information; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.8813629746207113,"score_gpt":0.6315672608982018,"score_spread":0.24979571372250953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416852874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03410412,0.021023864,0.001416704,0.44098198,0.005516997,0.002497344,0.000119348486,0.00001996177,0.49431968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7005692,0.0009289034,0.00026325425,0.0120369615,0.00005714996,0.000033381188,0.0000067713404,0.000011040765,0.28609332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807497,0.00068532425,0.0013032799,0.0021477384,0.013048928,0.0020650122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833741,0.010663084,0.00030109193,0.0017089414,0.0030311726,0.0009215856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026713345,0.00039247272,0.0008039781,0.11934432,0.0005555683,0.03903199,0.030966988,0.0003821862,0.006005896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03380599,0.000299119,0.00016219952,0.56780463,0.00041409486,0.0035982449,0.014560017,0.0011529993,0.00011619522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007028964,0.00016493598,0.1857572,0.0000212304,0.000021259066,0.00007347139,0.000025492061,0.000029387431,0.0000113504675,0.0056351097,0.6873275,0.120862745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012125022,0.000047553312,0.51280946,0.00010620768,0.000006749629,0.0000028700897,0.0017447756,0.003987445,0.0003586474,0.0063409256,0.47300628,0.0003766009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8441877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94728273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014498903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020399028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417026961","doi":"10.20944/preprints202512.0523.v1","title":"Publication Patterns in Engineering: A Quantitative Comparison of Open Access and Subscription-Based Journals","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Scopus; Quartile; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bibliometrics; Homogeneous; Dominance (genetics); Citation","score_opus":0.8814856229519147,"score_gpt":0.6870904937202651,"score_spread":0.1943951292316496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417026961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646625,0.0014487117,0.023467684,0.0032926658,0.0010375909,0.0025164941,0.00033921376,0.000022098688,0.0032130615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616617,0.0016412406,0.0009778781,0.000095625874,0.000028228847,0.00026094352,0.00004242811,0.000021698608,0.00076580705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835516,0.0011689109,0.0042820587,0.0028844061,0.007133501,0.000979486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975623,0.007933166,0.0028788343,0.0027347018,0.010090902,0.00073936704],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045177743,0.0005830484,0.0018446415,0.10708902,0.00024517055,0.009145802,0.015911965,0.0006037274,0.003861276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087255605,0.00054987136,0.00031521334,0.1287656,0.00028599682,0.0032887969,0.027832903,0.0020312995,0.00016410435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016960979,0.0010545551,0.9773446,0.00039448452,0.00009045004,0.0000040415694,0.0009382767,0.008196355,0.0017032141,0.0010501295,0.0001590194,0.008895265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009857913,0.00006726162,0.830194,0.0008176262,0.000026195747,8.6399837e-7,0.0004739079,0.1529658,0.011459556,0.001277531,0.001330293,0.0004011982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003696629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002558077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14715062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000521685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020358656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417049201","doi":"10.1097/bsd.0000000000001994","title":"The 100 Top-cited Articles on Cervical Spine Surgery","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cervical spine; MEDLINE; Cervical vertebrae; Foundation (evidence); Clinical Practice","score_opus":0.5775149705960011,"score_gpt":0.5899762524411751,"score_spread":0.012461281845174033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417049201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75244266,0.0013569358,0.0077784355,0.22500725,0.00439432,0.0007929695,0.00002104917,0.00024490568,0.007961498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773185,0.0014693923,0.00043363235,0.005942422,0.00077418226,0.00013884823,0.00009171819,0.000028657829,0.013802638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859318,0.0012980236,0.0040684897,0.0016207088,0.00586613,0.0012148315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349644,0.047793142,0.0016176469,0.0043140883,0.009971242,0.0013394504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07623993,0.00034628544,0.0010028412,0.028067598,0.0008354134,0.004221863,0.0025351567,0.00037119273,0.0008019937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41323817,0.00020980662,0.0010013251,0.1782577,0.00063747785,0.00078173005,0.00092343456,0.0008417261,0.0010703864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047865502,0.0005673851,0.173972,0.0000068187405,0.000034579567,0.0000040500718,0.0000037189504,0.000005847565,0.000049821087,0.008247489,0.23204756,0.58501285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020702237,0.00007873848,0.6265171,0.000026372285,0.000008715236,0.0000016601862,0.000021934136,0.003652728,0.00022147865,0.0039199223,0.3651723,0.00017202614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054956166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026994549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58484083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016211916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008338697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417081655","doi":"10.59350/3p77p-6vz25","title":"25 Years of Open Source &amp;amp; Open Access: An interview with Silvio Carvalho Neto","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Key (lock); Open source","score_opus":0.8420053937708964,"score_gpt":0.6610692611193921,"score_spread":0.18093613265150432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417081655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843855,0.0021184986,0.013738011,0.00533834,0.0014552944,0.005290248,0.00027889537,0.00012713554,0.08726805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.742102,0.0042460035,0.005462653,0.0011767169,0.00012485715,0.00012339054,0.000070388975,0.000110712295,0.24658328],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778828,0.0015554366,0.002251091,0.0027483334,0.013711353,0.0018509829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98214287,0.0052740974,0.001020078,0.0043855724,0.00538011,0.0017972535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06299999,0.000523946,0.001595085,0.083544835,0.00054414646,0.07006739,0.06353958,0.00030278516,0.028590905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017141707,0.0003732743,0.00029776327,0.51442933,0.00078454014,0.012230333,0.06951945,0.0006721173,0.008101331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015798285,0.0006022774,0.05806593,0.000057182315,0.00011588875,0.000030276378,0.0010896579,0.00032246346,0.00017097741,0.00042249923,0.24283727,0.6961276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016899152,0.0007194772,0.114823245,0.00020604658,0.000041668933,0.000013586088,0.0022763866,0.002970298,0.00024027376,0.0015986447,0.87471956,0.0007008934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019165043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008256914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018975046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020496827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417340277","doi":"10.18438/eblip30721","title":"Scoping Review of Transformative Agreement Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Citation; Benchmarking; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation; Workflow; Publishing; Mainstream","score_opus":0.5011623168686118,"score_gpt":0.610246223362673,"score_spread":0.10908390649406119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417340277","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016987149,0.18482699,0.0600511,0.443931,0.00050089386,0.00371148,0.000045293156,0.00005772143,0.3051768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13048077,0.7176226,0.012644678,0.13702913,0.000050191255,0.00018473493,0.000030621617,0.000008001955,0.0019492888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915577,0.0012627041,0.0013223881,0.00023204648,0.005333278,0.00029187102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95898765,0.037074283,0.00049526384,0.00056070613,0.0027101983,0.00017188177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04217914,0.000088076056,0.00024477477,0.020408712,0.000276929,0.001526424,0.0010428214,0.00005970019,0.0010917975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1358607,0.00006280658,0.00006411523,0.0886512,0.00018609944,0.19427226,0.00038745586,0.0003318116,0.00012939893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042819703,0.00015457945,0.0018669207,0.020151222,0.000029716904,0.0000030923843,0.0003408531,0.00004875167,0.00006753668,0.34181008,0.075516135,0.55958295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072895223,0.00054271315,0.008552674,0.14570037,0.000026510332,0.000005668211,0.0027256403,0.0061985273,0.011935057,0.0028032507,0.8205272,0.00025345714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059344093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8682747e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74501103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019733696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010935415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46055585","doi":"","title":"Ontario Research Commercialization Program","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œopen source business resource","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Business","score_opus":0.6793764034985403,"score_gpt":0.6065733378517199,"score_spread":0.07280306564682049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46055585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51135296,0.0006382794,0.0748475,0.006082501,0.0007408598,0.004598898,0.000011442362,0.00020311643,0.40152442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753931,0.00001561887,0.00093257806,0.00072247,0.00039159725,0.000093280396,0.000023774419,0.000054362867,0.12237324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97845334,0.0011566562,0.0012867256,0.0013226018,0.015927697,0.0018529777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784465,0.00842614,0.00041796206,0.0025312728,0.009549986,0.0006281691],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.107888505,0.0002865776,0.00048741218,0.024575276,0.0024050311,0.013433539,0.012339581,0.00026929838,0.0016111954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012926234,0.00017583094,0.00014855938,0.24562621,0.0009167989,0.0007686286,0.0059650876,0.0008620975,0.0014704545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020211533,0.00047422494,0.090805866,0.000005544197,0.000017361072,0.000026647464,0.001668414,0.0002066217,0.00009353242,0.00069059915,0.10910016,0.79670894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043321197,0.00010446081,0.24077985,0.000013700383,0.000004693808,0.000016862912,0.001359682,0.0007893253,0.000042847583,0.0012189752,0.7550413,0.0001950709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043466307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06261796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79651386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006035454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007241911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565775252","doi":"","title":"The Structures, Purpose and Funding of Academic Research Networks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.30958139827705083,"score_gpt":0.4584283362082118,"score_spread":0.14884693793116094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565775252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745794,0.0034970427,0.0022014556,0.0006391285,0.00031215587,0.00028764753,0.00002137254,0.000020251338,0.018441567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005544,0.00097418315,0.000087623164,0.000011609038,0.000090355024,3.3225004e-7,0.000002528331,0.000007240973,0.008770705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932621,0.00053411047,0.00036303696,0.00053407095,0.00457745,0.0007292125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99013853,0.007181678,0.00016925528,0.0005916903,0.001656453,0.00026237272],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013474201,0.000114089344,0.00020433238,0.025681566,0.00095783215,0.00070396945,0.0026060294,0.00020119303,0.00008100684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044314503,0.000076489974,0.000084256695,0.11398255,0.00080164586,0.00048005267,0.00094357575,0.00080626964,0.000019427882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172841,0.000018416355,0.85530096,0.0000027653066,0.000009044721,0.000029669663,0.000005584622,0.0003185585,0.00002966054,0.03310804,0.06654152,0.044574026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006919644,0.00013181727,0.11515669,0.000012250902,0.000009683858,3.0564767e-8,0.011543693,0.0057846727,0.000742652,0.031891078,0.8338344,0.00020106479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005113182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051989025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76729286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012246857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012794697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W596669352","doi":"10.5334/bbd.c","title":"How to Choose a Journal: Scientific and Practical Considerations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ubiquity Press eBooks","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7564742860492906,"score_gpt":0.5740717458064264,"score_spread":0.18240254024286418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W596669352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006429947,0.0010447759,0.0017651578,0.006582802,0.0022826297,0.0009666812,0.0002173858,0.000042832347,0.9864547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014221018,0.00009915734,0.0024910162,0.00026848156,0.00040097,0.000014753103,0.0000029194207,0.00003773386,0.98246396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869147,0.00017614063,0.0007793198,0.0014016816,0.009933238,0.00079495314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846082,0.0043282546,0.0008773606,0.0022000982,0.006287694,0.0016983914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022182297,0.000373859,0.00068321003,0.02829892,0.0029791414,0.09879713,0.001421971,0.00045300426,0.00030307376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08032943,0.0002754346,0.00025287434,0.00082978373,0.0013533145,0.0008238901,0.0028696598,0.001311106,0.0001652096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037938615,0.00004580579,0.000029202913,0.000019923407,0.00008957473,0.000774999,0.000564972,0.0000012026632,0.00023114526,0.3622587,0.5133515,0.12259503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021972353,0.000092805916,0.00011473884,0.000043518343,0.000028427286,0.00042305465,0.000017358432,0.000062307096,0.00024684082,0.14992514,0.84853595,0.00029011013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031943215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113541326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33518445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012682291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012660427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W601886334","doi":"","title":"Relationship among Economic Growth, Internet Usage and Publication Productivity: Comparison among ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and World’s Best Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Productivity; Gross domestic product; The Internet; Reputation; Citation; China; Business; Product (mathematics); Political science; Economics; Economic growth; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.1749007373404471,"score_gpt":0.42097202050621246,"score_spread":0.24607128316576538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W601886334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466877,0.00003795407,0.029185625,0.0012466335,0.00013327922,0.00039257816,0.000018206803,0.0000319126,0.022266103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761164,0.0000055867704,0.00054269424,0.000016526417,0.000041182575,0.000026152835,0.0000034886268,0.000009367576,0.0017433717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441934,0.00014723695,0.00065937656,0.0009359927,0.003427273,0.00041076756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946877,0.0023567765,0.0007220725,0.0005027692,0.0014326035,0.00029808484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02558743,0.00013846191,0.0002916391,0.021818722,0.0005932133,0.0029799573,0.0010437017,0.0000799036,0.00003102014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01646929,0.00011845661,0.000030862328,0.030340256,0.0013357509,0.0017111613,0.0004907787,0.00020087257,0.0000555133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006638794,0.000041687694,0.95741415,0.0000071794866,0.0000029142009,3.7552127e-8,0.00077090366,0.000033748485,0.00036484143,0.030861553,0.0003796101,0.01011674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002116037,0.000029564892,0.8267746,0.000006354087,0.000006484352,5.1422063e-7,0.0003039494,0.1562236,0.0009509657,0.014836007,0.0005275021,0.00012883806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016987503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012788657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15618984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026931963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017567471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610159414","doi":"","title":"The Political and Moral Economies of Science: A Case Study of Genomics in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political economy; Moral economy; Economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.18655461216141977,"score_gpt":0.3776869926487014,"score_spread":0.19113238048728165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610159414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99407643,0.00006483892,0.000011331653,0.0015847323,0.00011496876,0.00039218823,0.000046401798,0.000006912085,0.0037021958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912226,0.000039582716,0.000054948963,0.00005635546,0.000010296805,3.7143607e-7,0.0000014284795,0.000007104383,0.00070762524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582386,0.0001994223,0.00070606277,0.00051462656,0.0020193972,0.00073660613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902634,0.0077793216,0.00030397705,0.0006213241,0.00056620967,0.00046573897],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00654831,0.00016100975,0.0003999239,0.0129077695,0.00058569974,0.0007423717,0.0017954423,0.000051342297,0.000017382104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035256527,0.0000954424,0.000056382112,0.049293544,0.0037553646,0.001428112,0.0019926669,0.00023849569,5.5602544e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026862964,0.00012012338,0.8771647,0.0000048884467,0.00002512323,0.00043989634,0.0007609773,0.000025299609,0.000013426387,0.1158567,0.0004098083,0.0049103806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005311373,0.00038431204,0.70592153,0.000012711276,0.000028930242,0.00020868209,0.24914786,0.0042343894,0.0010112389,0.013600071,0.019738464,0.000400441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6600983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35528705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30481127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023945566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017404399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614075352","doi":"10.21225/d53595","title":"Implications of Open Access Journals for Professional Associations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Open access journal; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.5662083590230127,"score_gpt":0.6122572001089457,"score_spread":0.04604884108593299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614075352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482351,0.0005657493,0.007851407,0.033303842,0.0013555796,0.0004664995,0.000244748,0.0000021602725,0.007974916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900037,0.000031019303,0.0030886922,0.00011770538,0.00015780784,5.452342e-7,0.0000052548985,0.0000036658166,0.006591622],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809873,0.0001614332,0.00049443374,0.00014136577,0.0008887063,0.00021534621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98620206,0.0017248071,0.001101083,0.00021142515,0.010159213,0.00060141424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009654637,0.00005241542,0.00019908282,0.02172691,0.0003265644,0.0017459011,0.0038737424,0.000061394785,0.00038107444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017870452,0.000047048907,0.00012268763,0.021682872,0.00005942822,0.00276891,0.00015469074,0.00014967368,0.0000047462745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016807897,0.000109810615,0.31791785,0.0000023084776,0.000023966539,5.0072885e-7,0.0008245033,0.00007339957,0.00039193803,0.006040426,0.24618737,0.42841113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003443779,0.000033733697,0.7388798,0.000044040262,0.000017614544,0.000006864151,0.0022858132,0.000069683905,0.00017543451,0.0067610736,0.25131473,0.00006682663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012888528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006143106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4283443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005500328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065470817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63788921","doi":"","title":"The open access (OA) advantage: evidence for preferential citation of open access articles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology and Health Care","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8839307933496937,"score_gpt":0.755509902661279,"score_spread":0.12842089068841467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63788921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8192437,0.031494353,0.008127764,0.13447851,0.00043982972,0.0044503934,0.00010217985,0.00005726877,0.0016059806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956582,0.001886161,0.0015752098,0.0004103844,0.000028564968,0.00015457666,0.0000031811317,0.000005359726,0.00027833815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971793,0.00010897235,0.0005862362,0.0005033415,0.001200769,0.00042137248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453425,0.0024343554,0.00039264245,0.00061542727,0.0018894963,0.00013379869],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010231962,0.00008450251,0.00026908188,0.011568828,0.0008410072,0.006466575,0.012306262,0.000116482064,0.000068458576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009210368,0.00005140673,0.000032586428,0.045738794,0.00028133573,0.0036469041,0.008793124,0.00018051456,0.000007709137],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010403382,0.000027847303,0.071718074,0.000025865013,0.0000055404616,1.915811e-7,0.000158036,0.000004330036,0.000048936403,0.02121075,0.009980387,0.896716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027748232,0.0014026612,0.5496883,0.00015594778,0.00001877088,0.000007471341,0.009705503,0.002276731,0.011467916,0.20705551,0.21508233,0.00036407684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002450302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015824246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89635193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008552116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000503522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886123307","doi":"10.1453/jepe.v1i2.112","title":"From the Editor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KSP Journals - Journal of Economics Bibliography","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Editorial board; Quarter (Canadian coin); Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.4241383101638885,"score_gpt":0.5062122997337095,"score_spread":0.08207398956982104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886123307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.938331,0.010307353,0.010242817,0.015989844,0.019538742,0.00014738375,0.00008913658,0.000009774719,0.005343967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386695,0.03431672,0.0025855873,0.001524186,0.022794722,0.0000015991577,0.0000010716303,0.000027832428,0.000078794306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992037,0.0007034823,0.0024698107,0.0004184887,0.003724378,0.0006468514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97569054,0.014594097,0.002919624,0.0009872161,0.004894793,0.0009137063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056309357,0.00023456804,0.0007029424,0.31035537,0.0004556269,0.008116585,0.006159867,0.0001702221,0.0014727027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014102549,0.00012748172,0.001215001,0.30891886,0.0002839964,0.0019215262,0.00041685993,0.0009861283,0.00019680808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043362754,0.000081170576,0.17795363,5.9102206e-7,0.00013226726,0.0000048798634,0.00006456982,0.00032869328,0.000156035,0.00030015284,0.7867054,0.034229293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008464036,0.0002973576,0.16432065,0.000027510312,0.000032722677,0.00008289021,0.00040903853,0.0013394471,0.0002673876,0.17788844,0.65428257,0.00020561207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007187817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001875173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17758828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035639227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017406997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886146868","doi":"10.14662/ijalis2015.033","title":"ARABIAN ONLINE OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS : A STUDY ON DOAJ","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFM-OAR (INFN Catania)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Subject (documents); Developing country; Access to information; Developed country; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.9637856923124178,"score_gpt":0.7722875945843289,"score_spread":0.1914980977280889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886146868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652186,0.00047902795,0.00027760904,0.0038338352,0.0013430723,0.0012602833,0.00020639783,0.000051688847,0.027329512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941372,0.000081495076,0.0003378642,0.0012057141,0.00035355595,0.000036630427,0.000012653293,0.000031301475,0.0038035407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061943,0.00064589997,0.0013851895,0.0012754187,0.015109381,0.00096470595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873575,0.002929285,0.0006045934,0.0022907944,0.005171668,0.0016461553],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03723919,0.00032379967,0.00071960036,0.04469252,0.00040328797,0.025007846,0.017484462,0.00016054683,0.0014361022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056722037,0.00022355816,0.00016539026,0.16032057,0.00015143084,0.0036300044,0.007229806,0.00077045924,0.002848958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002037496,0.0026166774,0.55806196,0.0000027063506,0.00006622895,0.00029767383,0.0010730891,0.00019048573,0.00017108607,0.00020923541,0.24764572,0.18946141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031282273,0.0014769248,0.73067313,0.000034286422,0.000021149152,0.0000322367,0.005582589,0.0010356894,0.0003309907,0.013038765,0.24402896,0.000617053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011141767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049842836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18884435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003489347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096558116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6888828565","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2027238.1460","title":"The Co-authorship Network and Citation Analysis of Health Knowledge Management Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation; Health care; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Health management system; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Citation impact","score_opus":0.8926591498591072,"score_gpt":0.7794451223742003,"score_spread":0.11321402748490694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6888828565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64212924,0.24420756,0.011096129,0.0036142159,0.0012038144,0.0016981035,0.00007365013,0.000022538381,0.09595476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502077,0.045467373,0.00031103456,0.00012224467,0.00003134964,0.000023823244,0.000005283541,0.000009898877,0.0038213104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98797077,0.0026204383,0.0018716478,0.0006987504,0.0060987,0.000739714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824281,0.012353466,0.0011791234,0.0009063617,0.0027252138,0.00040773954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10741798,0.0001754936,0.00086515234,0.072769694,0.0009842718,0.007945243,0.0070336275,0.00008598552,0.0011199734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014182395,0.000112270165,0.0002655675,0.2876006,0.00043096836,0.0011398058,0.0027197273,0.0004204217,0.000010034305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007751501,0.000099302415,0.5190749,0.000030828694,0.0005872277,0.0000022647594,0.00014043783,0.00035978653,0.00010541469,0.0026807953,0.10824093,0.3686006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022782396,0.0000134899465,0.93110585,0.00008134758,0.000079411184,2.1985551e-7,0.00057146966,0.0024346975,0.00014027102,0.035817128,0.029425018,0.000103254366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043317152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017442572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41203097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017966735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889244635","doi":"10.25547/kp0a-9630","title":"Recommandations politiques pour le libre accès aux données de recherche en Europe (RECODE)","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Textual Cultures Lab","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Order (exchange); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.6224377247633078,"score_gpt":0.5920105115187804,"score_spread":0.030427213244527462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889244635","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069666825,0.44400662,0.01640344,0.22815974,0.0024122514,0.00093760074,0.00066220475,0.00068866153,0.23706265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33063403,0.07638933,0.0059937793,0.001473402,0.0018779079,0.000058439935,0.00009657026,0.00010662359,0.5833699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874735,0.004426701,0.00093656476,0.0014291817,0.0031698716,0.0025641765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98517275,0.010632445,0.00016138842,0.00085917127,0.002412153,0.00076209626],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027783608,0.00048246697,0.00050980743,0.012781419,0.00071229023,0.009977939,0.0042379727,0.00096678507,0.0044155866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03935568,0.0003695089,0.00039614917,0.10008521,0.000358988,0.0022646266,0.0012493561,0.0037012163,0.0033851776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020924823,0.00022394501,0.00015566683,0.000043527263,0.00010523538,0.00004718778,0.0015207077,0.00002621916,0.0016700445,0.23988584,0.3796219,0.3766788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003328529,0.00038781372,0.0013688875,0.00012677012,0.00004128244,0.00015382281,0.0019725757,0.0055215945,0.0035822713,0.09599838,0.8900621,0.0004516881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027967426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001495494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5104402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015012199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987566},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["open_science","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6891857844","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1602.07396","title":"Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Measure (data warehouse); Duration (music); Grant funding; Basic research","score_opus":0.8029701652265703,"score_gpt":0.493680286312782,"score_spread":0.3092898789137883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6891857844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281231,0.00013970166,0.05173451,0.00047701856,0.000695522,0.00048108384,0.00008039464,0.000031073967,0.018237595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992567,0.000231745,0.00044294717,0.000022807099,0.00015312368,9.64727e-7,0.000005924852,0.00001672306,0.0065587442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914778,0.001011749,0.00063765625,0.0017356887,0.004063488,0.0010736545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414266,0.005849652,0.00043141044,0.0016478273,0.007027949,0.00090052513],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027171066,0.00023620093,0.00051136944,0.04436725,0.00035603278,0.0010644089,0.004354546,0.00038445965,0.0006230684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025596859,0.0001926578,0.00026744526,0.10615418,0.000511331,0.0005164748,0.004386989,0.0008761375,0.0004577431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071674655,0.00032961144,0.74511087,0.00012135384,0.000101036145,0.00043251744,0.0005880289,0.0072743534,0.010145738,0.20625986,0.013831833,0.01508803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025964328,0.0010204999,0.19188271,0.0012543696,0.00008374826,0.00001812063,0.0028107425,0.081407204,0.017607061,0.68512475,0.01442298,0.0017713711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018639115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004570747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5532282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080859126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009121754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892409167","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10019672","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Leading Countries in Energy Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Energy (signal processing); Originality; Set (abstract data type); Bibliometrics; Basic research","score_opus":0.41830265400411526,"score_gpt":0.4928784972704565,"score_spread":0.07457584326634126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892409167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7026541,0.0023426998,0.012827451,0.0025525473,0.00019623118,0.0005505776,0.0003755627,0.00029134876,0.27820948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971949,0.00094405265,0.00013669833,0.00008909965,0.000047471563,3.670703e-8,0.00015324463,0.00019075251,0.0012437283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863986,0.0014873487,0.00097491714,0.0009216603,0.009244862,0.00097260583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98669106,0.0017116178,0.00027098213,0.0011457219,0.009763175,0.00041742885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039154034,0.00015556323,0.0005275729,0.74899954,0.0015590857,0.004908014,0.005038745,0.00013344173,0.012816261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046541344,0.00013618276,0.00017989495,0.9072407,0.00041901952,0.0008002715,0.0018851209,0.00047863618,0.0021487472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103376755,0.00044387116,0.0020070162,0.000011422686,0.00011181749,0.00003234187,0.0006499676,0.0009108527,0.0033584253,0.022576611,0.11147688,0.85831743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046515846,0.00054211187,0.15223762,0.000015288795,0.00002377085,0.000010672072,0.0005871685,0.00814226,0.0010805515,0.0033979479,0.8332947,0.00020276882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000126673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003932986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85811466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003503364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022712962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892490753","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10030061","title":"Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Natural science; Digital humanities; The arts; Index (typography); Citation","score_opus":0.30268262161416704,"score_gpt":0.4379942073838392,"score_spread":0.13531158576967217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892490753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65982264,0.0017741272,0.0014272154,0.010607859,0.00040535408,0.0011065403,0.00045992882,0.00009876658,0.32429755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988751,0.000021447646,0.00004406876,0.00015903015,0.00005951768,4.8666717e-8,0.000039445375,0.00003298273,0.0007683868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949602,0.0010237135,0.00037112786,0.00039776595,0.0028681604,0.00037902044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961312,0.00063346623,0.00024417005,0.00026271993,0.0026678983,0.000060576527],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013132841,0.000087948945,0.00021690712,0.010601136,0.011598508,0.008638292,0.002853345,0.000038000933,0.001003741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038920813,0.000048224145,0.00008794223,0.11887065,0.0037583471,0.00041908905,0.0010667013,0.00018472313,0.00007047923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009071023,0.000117717784,0.0030041933,0.000008388026,0.00022992257,0.000002447358,0.0068228566,0.012662838,0.00032522273,0.5647142,0.38613057,0.025890931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007728746,0.00014999806,0.12561452,0.0000075196785,0.00009099185,0.000010347691,0.00763835,0.152305,0.00009181644,0.0038643212,0.70923966,0.00021457886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007899376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003143468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5608499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015274377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005979202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6892654067","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11259570","title":"Attitudes towards Open Monographs in the European Research Area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Documentation; Prestige; European Research Area; Open research; Open data; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.6712650080287537,"score_gpt":0.5427315378929685,"score_spread":0.1285334701357852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6892654067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052189782,0.0013961947,0.0021429358,0.008098266,0.00036229382,0.0014033784,0.00030424318,0.00039055294,0.93371236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995369,0.0004779801,0.00019312855,0.0001663507,0.00017896482,2.8354253e-7,0.00020226826,0.0005697883,0.002842237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833819,0.0058189146,0.0007078146,0.0012615388,0.007781446,0.0010483414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293697,0.0014819292,0.00008742251,0.001592712,0.0035159877,0.00038495671],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10944281,0.00019347791,0.00024991314,0.02773922,0.0033533347,0.04585475,0.01648457,0.00008370625,0.011174799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0264889,0.00012779342,0.00013230539,0.13173364,0.00058820395,0.0013010704,0.01079461,0.0012232892,0.022937259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022267255,0.00018794194,0.00010451343,0.00001769872,0.000017221522,0.00014857782,0.0015728686,0.000018187482,0.00032408925,0.007509631,0.5038732,0.48620376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002757132,0.000263312,0.021826943,0.0000465193,0.0000031563784,0.000083439976,0.0016140145,0.0011412145,0.00005993032,0.005235841,0.9692799,0.00017004233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015213246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049610594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002462214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003487592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893144308","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14072565","title":"Incentivizing, excluding, and enduring: On the complexities of quantitative research assessment in Lithuania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lithuanian; Citation; Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Impact factor; Quality assessment; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.7416085686925351,"score_gpt":0.5619430653180032,"score_spread":0.1796655033745319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893144308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7223852,0.001137182,0.0017500981,0.005782616,0.00022759038,0.0008104008,0.00022620146,0.00016211101,0.26751855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980967,0.00028829297,0.0002423178,0.000030588333,0.000041632502,1.4330989e-7,0.000028487275,0.00020805151,0.0010637998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183387,0.0017192909,0.0005099562,0.0006712006,0.0047352337,0.00053043134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321365,0.0035272874,0.00009574084,0.0005840402,0.002405366,0.00017389018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033215985,0.000117661235,0.00020404268,0.018097669,0.0016181481,0.005869974,0.0023061465,0.00005622554,0.005035297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019661425,0.0000793647,0.00005496008,0.04465695,0.00080767844,0.0004151502,0.0030137948,0.0007965912,0.0014294182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067222,0.0002590203,0.0003435076,0.00008573804,0.000039632985,0.00003991093,0.0045257043,0.000034111843,0.005758485,0.7295935,0.13855052,0.12070265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032983904,0.0008468501,0.034730133,0.00017955538,0.0000032975925,0.000022014905,0.0082573965,0.011495149,0.0010889156,0.028363016,0.9145084,0.00017542596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000842322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025062138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7759579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024173182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025850002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893716959","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4663352","title":"Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Reading (process); Technical peer review; Publishing; Peer group","score_opus":0.35782250779723024,"score_gpt":0.5553345672856039,"score_spread":0.1975120594883737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893716959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.873923,0.03394583,0.000014626112,0.07820741,0.000574761,0.0013566143,0.002679869,0.000011652784,0.009286251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72280043,0.26782212,0.0022968985,0.0027958339,0.00041182502,0.00003879372,0.00025326933,0.000040511895,0.0035402942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974312,0.0010945214,0.0043875147,0.0032361597,0.010680095,0.0062896917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94470185,0.0065879063,0.0010456023,0.0031658255,0.034771405,0.009727408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21315849,0.00050018297,0.0020743625,0.01697304,0.0012555066,0.0043125437,0.004646407,0.00032422759,0.00078498054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2743642,0.00038999913,0.00036378874,0.043714944,0.0115913665,0.0039809505,0.005807569,0.0020483905,0.000054336935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077347606,0.00080791576,0.038026,0.0018166292,0.000069416856,0.00009429724,0.00013276344,0.000027961905,0.002104394,0.9128997,0.028720964,0.015222635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023600839,0.002163948,0.08031662,0.009342674,0.00016314116,0.001091936,0.007498496,0.011578682,0.01778264,0.24435899,0.6211157,0.0022270938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002725299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025586435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66854066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012907257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011486731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893994731","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6625300","title":"The oligopoly's shift to open access publishing: How for-profit publishers benefit from gold and hybrid article processing charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); The Internet; Publication; Oligopoly; Web site","score_opus":0.43773702301008016,"score_gpt":0.4652374530212549,"score_spread":0.027500430011174748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893994731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8105176,0.0010278978,0.0073741334,0.12825808,0.0006628875,0.003102487,0.001954856,0.00042668934,0.04667536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941408,0.00003859953,0.00029020978,0.0007297175,0.00013759872,0.0000019679412,0.00028570194,0.00041291435,0.0039624874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928688,0.00048735345,0.00043983202,0.0010726447,0.0043015284,0.0008298644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403995,0.0009482555,0.00027976104,0.0009552838,0.0031042504,0.0006724713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018087002,0.00016289392,0.00022980757,0.0064972593,0.008539215,0.23520137,0.01620127,0.000041824373,0.004518083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037291307,0.00012485516,0.00006537441,0.038928367,0.00020396935,0.008716179,0.028604187,0.00046809952,0.00033652168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097204254,0.000033972916,0.0005865882,0.000005259385,0.000016582893,0.0000038491407,0.0005467145,0.000038948077,0.0004038067,0.0029092645,0.5169939,0.47836393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000560763,0.00020451493,0.01655436,0.0000056358635,0.0000055806836,0.0000119668775,0.0021354211,0.0030970224,0.0004647335,0.010124534,0.9666393,0.00019616101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019336335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051616375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47816777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025318033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003199101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894102046","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7057143","title":"The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publishing; Publication; The Internet; Profit (economics); Net profit","score_opus":0.5955949863532198,"score_gpt":0.5129104818611224,"score_spread":0.08268450449209741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894102046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68660116,0.0007946875,0.0030216589,0.24548434,0.0009239383,0.003177127,0.00047955127,0.0010016286,0.05851594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897393,0.00022791934,0.00005031993,0.0006863192,0.0002858058,9.3277504e-7,0.00012157129,0.00043568152,0.008452154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992023,0.0008515047,0.00046253172,0.0009117464,0.0047995285,0.00095171924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939661,0.0012584045,0.0002478012,0.0011705284,0.0028118433,0.00054534676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01979611,0.00016621621,0.0001993501,0.006877005,0.0072405892,0.10264891,0.02165181,0.00009432722,0.0028556793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052950375,0.00009484199,0.00007170182,0.103347905,0.0003742113,0.003367598,0.020838145,0.0006585284,0.014050075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003271868,0.000015086534,0.00027749874,0.0000026837452,0.000012664427,0.0000040150603,0.0011547292,0.000025489702,0.0006382127,0.0006192898,0.5285488,0.46866885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027322597,0.00008340933,0.044440057,0.00001572434,0.0000046920927,0.000004046597,0.0029483885,0.002502762,0.00079329766,0.0049175094,0.9438586,0.00015827904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015096266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053449803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46851057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043775042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894127560","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6625301","title":"The oligopoly's shift to open access publishing: How for-profit publishers benefit from gold and hybrid article processing charges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); The Internet; Publication; Oligopoly; Web site","score_opus":0.43773702301008016,"score_gpt":0.4652374530212549,"score_spread":0.027500430011174748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894127560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8105176,0.0010278978,0.0073741334,0.12825808,0.0006628875,0.003102487,0.001954856,0.00042668934,0.04667536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941408,0.00003859953,0.00029020978,0.0007297175,0.00013759872,0.0000019679412,0.00028570194,0.00041291435,0.0039624874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928688,0.00048735345,0.00043983202,0.0010726447,0.0043015284,0.0008298644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403995,0.0009482555,0.00027976104,0.0009552838,0.0031042504,0.0006724713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018087002,0.00016289392,0.00022980757,0.0064972593,0.008539215,0.23520137,0.01620127,0.000041824373,0.004518083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037291307,0.00012485516,0.00006537441,0.038928367,0.00020396935,0.008716179,0.028604187,0.00046809952,0.00033652168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097204254,0.000033972916,0.0005865882,0.000005259385,0.000016582893,0.0000038491407,0.0005467145,0.000038948077,0.0004038067,0.0029092645,0.5169939,0.47836393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000560763,0.00020451493,0.01655436,0.0000056358635,0.0000055806836,0.0000119668775,0.0021354211,0.0030970224,0.0004647335,0.010124534,0.9666393,0.00019616101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019336335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051616375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47816777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025318033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003199101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901892655","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14927189.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.8486557295322864,"score_gpt":0.6260689090531582,"score_spread":0.22258682047912826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901892655","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014698143,0.00042558138,0.000012156855,0.00036998338,0.000052620275,0.00014618025,0.9863372,0.000018990466,0.011167503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018726084,0.000008081157,0.002554403,0.0003198078,0.000224505,0.00044315463,0.9676782,0.000017404916,0.010028387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788526,0.000811906,0.0008652634,0.0012294125,0.017450867,0.0007899157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8470082,0.1302154,0.0003116504,0.001813663,0.019499222,0.001151798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004296101,0.00016432187,0.0005560771,0.71941704,0.00027502116,0.001942593,0.0027842908,0.00021594805,0.9991601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6895123,0.00013084593,0.0004968745,0.9700267,0.000051389772,0.00039758187,0.002500511,0.0005235072,0.05729236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000803114,0.00013276888,0.0008632945,0.0000049024384,0.00006899134,0.00006747379,0.00003216135,0.000014829701,0.000021968199,0.0000010927362,0.9705923,0.028192172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000759944,0.000079494996,0.2673119,0.000110799825,0.0000073715087,0.0000019351578,0.000110445384,0.00079645147,0.00020035062,0.00037155856,0.7308152,0.00011851439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055901975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010140178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94186777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014177998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012399936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902044807","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12703760","title":"Additional file 1 of Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Inclusion (mineral); Diagram; Data flow diagram; File format","score_opus":0.9198947187760822,"score_gpt":0.6758150319941278,"score_spread":0.24407968678195435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902044807","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037862551,0.0025911818,0.000040012696,0.044164814,0.00019456852,0.0013473324,0.76473475,0.0000016683939,0.18313944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13085127,0.0018048101,0.22092858,0.01644415,0.00065866153,0.0015646724,0.15178142,0.000106890155,0.47585955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916962,0.00018066281,0.0005981616,0.0004283687,0.006893013,0.00020364227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852956,0.011046607,0.00028099772,0.0003161182,0.002869491,0.00019117966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008234116,0.00006529958,0.00028018124,0.005132354,0.000055516353,0.00046868296,0.0023036378,0.000045386987,0.9822836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20882024,0.00004394006,0.00006918347,0.08512795,0.000056557965,0.00045289943,0.0011293647,0.00017778113,0.005253532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047416725,0.00003298829,0.00018384476,0.000008648394,0.0000014302918,0.0000065131208,0.000041577234,5.900682e-7,0.000017192615,0.000008815199,0.847325,0.15236862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010522287,0.000028263808,0.007304892,0.0003808135,8.3721136e-7,0.0000011417889,0.00013737573,0.0004608912,0.000053718548,0.0001577352,0.99130887,0.000060212456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011960151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008604601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000183398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037496514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902115866","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14927189","title":"Additional file 1 of Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; Empirical research","score_opus":0.8486557295322864,"score_gpt":0.6260689090531582,"score_spread":0.22258682047912826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902115866","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014698143,0.00042558138,0.000012156855,0.00036998338,0.000052620275,0.00014618025,0.9863372,0.000018990466,0.011167503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018726084,0.000008081157,0.002554403,0.0003198078,0.000224505,0.00044315463,0.9676782,0.000017404916,0.010028387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788526,0.000811906,0.0008652634,0.0012294125,0.017450867,0.0007899157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8470082,0.1302154,0.0003116504,0.001813663,0.019499222,0.001151798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004296101,0.00016432187,0.0005560771,0.71941704,0.00027502116,0.001942593,0.0027842908,0.00021594805,0.9991601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6895123,0.00013084593,0.0004968745,0.9700267,0.000051389772,0.00039758187,0.002500511,0.0005235072,0.05729236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000803114,0.00013276888,0.0008632945,0.0000049024384,0.00006899134,0.00006747379,0.00003216135,0.000014829701,0.000021968199,0.0000010927362,0.9705923,0.028192172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000759944,0.000079494996,0.2673119,0.000110799825,0.0000073715087,0.0000019351578,0.000110445384,0.00079645147,0.00020035062,0.00037155856,0.7308152,0.00011851439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055901975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010140178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94186777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014177998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012399936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990935},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6902209356","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.5331967","title":"Charleston Hyde Park Debate 2017 Opening Statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Statement (logic); Session (web analytics); George (robot); South carolina; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.879765729153358,"score_gpt":0.6524550071459614,"score_spread":0.22731072200739666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902209356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13575582,0.0034052634,0.00016081955,0.0062154173,0.0023281442,0.002127072,0.39909583,0.00020972856,0.4507019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821949,0.00007434006,0.00031711883,0.00017437573,0.00018453722,0.00010417261,0.0039131497,0.000018915416,0.013018483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217904,0.000095134805,0.00051514636,0.0007120609,0.0058310865,0.00066756416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394596,0.001257191,0.00060031586,0.0019645658,0.0017538872,0.00047810192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005369314,0.00015408873,0.00025556673,0.010519395,0.0013215034,0.0109349415,0.005929666,0.00008829896,0.18327619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10663297,0.00010862494,0.00012728423,0.013278085,0.000030792227,0.0014043397,0.0024819812,0.00023165932,0.027645288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057014668,0.000025366979,0.004451118,0.0000064215737,0.000006434138,0.000066534565,0.00004417103,0.000009446475,0.00006999228,0.000017128583,0.87302446,0.12227324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003183866,0.00005908598,0.15809484,0.00012950625,0.0000016046018,0.000005603808,0.000054364216,0.0022320002,0.0013177156,0.0006354049,0.836955,0.00019645963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079225836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003322646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84643906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008159681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018012828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903540210","doi":"10.1093/scipol/scaf012","title":"Gender differences in Australian research grant awards, applications, amounts, and workforce participation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; University of New South Wales; Australian Government","keywords":"Workforce; Grant funding; Workforce planning; Public policy; Public funding","score_opus":0.7507933445357738,"score_gpt":0.6420226026528547,"score_spread":0.10877074188291913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903540210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96003044,0.0008441632,0.00066146295,0.019663272,0.00010053323,0.00047567065,0.000012909079,0.00001699111,0.018194577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640656,0.0006531035,0.00016061624,0.00027876048,0.00005509876,0.0000977008,0.0000010030523,0.0000026036626,0.0023445839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908717,0.00028098573,0.0004815431,0.0008953787,0.0063437317,0.0011266107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423385,0.0017802616,0.00008326882,0.00060371315,0.0027056087,0.0005932798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039026,0.00010852288,0.00020871793,0.06780546,0.0009948974,0.0054429392,0.0017918173,0.000086811895,0.000033770953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030869212,0.000075459,0.000022637312,0.2575809,0.0023098995,0.0012936023,0.0008869653,0.00030653554,0.000032808377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041949806,0.00004484157,0.5157855,0.000005351474,0.0000013760083,5.6548066e-7,0.00016938186,5.23814e-7,0.00015560702,0.13740999,0.0019420757,0.34448057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019446715,0.000035408386,0.84734654,0.0000073611113,8.716796e-7,0.000001323284,0.00090473087,0.0011234548,0.00010864514,0.100741774,0.04944675,0.000088656074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001575073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001964609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34439194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020685329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021682007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904655062","doi":"10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0230","title":"Definition and Measurement of Core Collaborators in Scientific Research Collaboration: A Measurement Methodology Based on the H-Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); China; Empirical research; Contrast (vision)","score_opus":0.9675043815555285,"score_gpt":0.7558281282383683,"score_spread":0.21167625331716022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904655062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844892,0.0054076235,0.00075056567,0.0029564674,0.0010095105,0.0014821817,0.00010382476,0.000016089954,0.003784538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980118,0.0013304558,0.0003245265,0.00009769669,0.000038819893,0.000106943495,0.0000035538299,0.000019110443,0.00006704353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96033514,0.005673597,0.0019165066,0.0011443709,0.030069746,0.00086066953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608568,0.01339619,0.0009139656,0.0011133783,0.023343792,0.0003758535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28298017,0.00022496106,0.00075259747,0.07911685,0.00084163406,0.0076298625,0.005515231,0.00015119604,0.0021606188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13331987,0.00014733587,0.00011224743,0.3143796,0.0008603448,0.0012171441,0.001662094,0.00061855983,0.000040559695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006491691,0.00050650793,0.7287006,0.000054626114,0.000059838174,0.000033860324,0.00037617638,0.0009239066,0.10019561,0.0023351521,0.14867158,0.017493004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009307151,0.000087308144,0.8908979,0.00027189855,0.0000120705145,0.0000013919757,0.0018640073,0.0050073178,0.026997523,0.067583986,0.0061080325,0.00023784133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036613774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068233657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23526275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051541236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002156634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6907202708","doi":"10.21065/advengtech.2.10","title":"REVISED FINITE FIELD-DEPENDENT BRST FORMULATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Publication; Directory; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Open source software; Cover (algebra)","score_opus":0.7391150737279576,"score_gpt":0.6324462365432154,"score_spread":0.10666883718474218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6907202708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32818905,0.00018960272,0.09640668,0.010358201,0.00143271,0.00043052607,0.000013563514,0.0000561036,0.56292355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665011,0.00007302322,0.0008456301,0.00030275737,0.00009307021,0.000003896341,0.0000010591317,0.00000428518,0.032175172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296737,0.00005835585,0.00043041204,0.00045166723,0.0057438356,0.00034835565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927164,0.0036191372,0.0002757539,0.0016364362,0.0015016191,0.00025065508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012180987,0.00008403674,0.00017061555,0.015424345,0.000811976,0.007088936,0.002985116,0.000087207416,0.0039771763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09607867,0.000052681826,0.000111040375,0.017166553,0.00003938389,0.0010953371,0.0008320945,0.0001397324,0.0018357359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025653015,0.000064277076,0.26687223,0.0000030920814,0.000007715801,0.0000140816155,0.000048633497,0.00003195874,0.0005286007,0.008376307,0.042694826,0.6813326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011352991,0.00026570942,0.74302274,0.000011671563,0.0000053710364,0.000004357665,0.00013349384,0.048070144,0.007985623,0.046535395,0.15249391,0.00033629526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017540515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000499995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6809963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003462885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006186617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911328626","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10551710","title":"The European landscape of institutional publishing - A synopsis of results from the DIAMAS survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Horizon; Electronic publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.6565119254431434,"score_gpt":0.5427765578711589,"score_spread":0.11373536757198455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911328626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77400136,0.0020054267,0.00021451156,0.0031654423,0.00068290683,0.00021628203,0.002336318,0.0000011437654,0.21737657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616385,0.00011499485,0.00031799803,0.00001315511,0.00007202721,0.0000013786288,0.00004509071,0.000004387032,0.003267153],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226695,0.0013055985,0.00082889746,0.0005083991,0.004841705,0.0002484362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614256,0.035905473,0.00022552806,0.00084732077,0.0014864781,0.000109596636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09542537,0.000071607494,0.00016140347,0.004027471,0.00028927793,0.013017886,0.005651018,0.000037941336,0.0005593558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12438721,0.000030197038,0.00008195591,0.0707826,0.0002853447,0.0011102747,0.0020118512,0.00022482671,0.0002965934],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006110696,0.000037762908,0.029003933,7.605873e-7,0.000036282192,0.000010820291,0.0005639695,0.00004418156,0.00015162179,0.0002438014,0.09615125,0.87369454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812447,0.00003485761,0.6381174,0.00003333098,0.0000052856917,0.0000014673525,0.0004506647,0.0026043067,0.00045233662,0.00071621325,0.35724115,0.000061782834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021987783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001005937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8736327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018300401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911780996","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13951887","title":"Well-tailored words: Comparing the fit of articles within scholarly journals to their citation rates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Publishing; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.565975177827574,"score_gpt":0.48002691968482236,"score_spread":0.08594825814275164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911780996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94957757,0.0012612035,0.016063541,0.0064075976,0.000364381,0.0005504974,0.000079481004,0.0002414948,0.025454247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.00009058519,0.00027206272,0.000110797366,0.00009239998,7.007587e-8,0.000023131615,0.00024370223,0.0009783409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382156,0.0007872737,0.00068473606,0.000517638,0.0037726,0.00041616123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936577,0.0010083,0.0001753207,0.00065085903,0.0041813343,0.00032648706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022744002,0.00012378671,0.00020359096,0.013963989,0.0016533406,0.020775229,0.0033711898,0.000052211675,0.007161306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029267903,0.00007719614,0.00009748817,0.06955185,0.00020450627,0.0013698392,0.0018848771,0.00045306844,0.008330167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001622632,0.0002200005,0.0010102178,0.000054423996,0.00012491227,0.000021770222,0.013296259,0.0029252323,0.042709447,0.0112829385,0.35856715,0.5696254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043178935,0.00047544565,0.026049944,0.00014463336,0.000014706201,0.00006787966,0.009436639,0.051675174,0.011303514,0.010529182,0.88959473,0.00027637658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022027445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012026185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111365625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016506521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911856911","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13951886","title":"Well-tailored words: Comparing the fit of articles within scholarly journals to their citation rates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject (documents); Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Publishing; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.565975177827574,"score_gpt":0.48002691968482236,"score_spread":0.08594825814275164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911856911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94957757,0.0012612035,0.016063541,0.0064075976,0.000364381,0.0005504974,0.000079481004,0.0002414948,0.025454247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.00009058519,0.00027206272,0.000110797366,0.00009239998,7.007587e-8,0.000023131615,0.00024370223,0.0009783409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382156,0.0007872737,0.00068473606,0.000517638,0.0037726,0.00041616123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936577,0.0010083,0.0001753207,0.00065085903,0.0041813343,0.00032648706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022744002,0.00012378671,0.00020359096,0.013963989,0.0016533406,0.020775229,0.0033711898,0.000052211675,0.007161306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029267903,0.00007719614,0.00009748817,0.06955185,0.00020450627,0.0013698392,0.0018848771,0.00045306844,0.008330167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001622632,0.0002200005,0.0010102178,0.000054423996,0.00012491227,0.000021770222,0.013296259,0.0029252323,0.042709447,0.0112829385,0.35856715,0.5696254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043178935,0.00047544565,0.026049944,0.00014463336,0.000014706201,0.00006787966,0.009436639,0.051675174,0.011303514,0.010529182,0.88959473,0.00027637658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022027445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012026185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111365625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016506521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912098540","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15104692","title":"Comparative Analysis of Global Research Publications (2020-2024): Trends, Statistical Insights and recommendations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Statistical analysis; Bibliometrics; Key (lock); Research methodology; Comparative research; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.4075055196280089,"score_gpt":0.5343509377203605,"score_spread":0.12684541809235156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912098540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08340674,0.0009044313,0.054795325,0.01345593,0.00031363123,0.00072984747,0.003953382,0.000295987,0.8421447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222094,0.00021611397,0.0009415702,0.00005212531,0.000023550429,2.0150797e-7,0.00094875105,0.00006213,0.0055345995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348086,0.0015709696,0.00071139366,0.0008255881,0.0029285192,0.00048267795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988196,0.0018396875,0.00017326456,0.0008789105,0.008530259,0.0003818921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103023965,0.00012312662,0.00038609913,0.03253573,0.0026371018,0.0041549895,0.0024988856,0.0000850376,0.01918941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021292465,0.00010573621,0.000089172405,0.25035655,0.000745857,0.00048197588,0.0029849089,0.00039115257,0.0008310016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030609794,0.00025404806,0.00064067676,0.000006663962,0.00023881602,0.000001637165,0.00043786917,0.000039474486,0.00012649846,0.17829794,0.62064,0.19928579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029004284,0.00014507338,0.112018086,0.0000074609657,0.00005716193,0.0000039417905,0.0015168698,0.008112335,0.00003675238,0.008897445,0.86881334,0.00010152098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079939586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001667249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90881425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028078337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003634786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912287910","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16848496","title":"Survey 2025: Repository data of Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (2021-2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"EMPA; Resource (disambiguation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Data collection; Information repository","score_opus":0.3340918517089357,"score_gpt":0.47247331541824933,"score_spread":0.13838146370931365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912287910","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016378314,0.00064490776,0.00018996494,0.0005579715,0.0009996499,0.0007752302,0.99384314,0.0000681971,0.0012831115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0088657,0.0009204387,0.00027035363,0.000052126183,0.00020145212,3.32057e-7,0.98606807,0.00026972248,0.0033518188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050665,0.0008018654,0.0010078553,0.0017610023,0.0051898113,0.0007327913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721078,0.0011266124,0.00062677235,0.0033603988,0.022447664,0.00033070514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03731608,0.00025897814,0.0006007787,0.031798795,0.0035409085,0.010087444,0.013550159,0.0002900853,0.0030091836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18494877,0.00022404046,0.00003416782,0.107946366,0.0017628924,0.0008191487,0.02002313,0.00043703293,0.00024075739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057803776,0.00009505394,0.000027163069,0.000106787134,0.000030323363,0.000007412637,0.000019484622,5.5356094e-7,0.0021427986,0.00016611343,0.9806489,0.016697641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031577813,0.00027046268,0.0006197831,0.000042102798,0.000014699563,0.000015962667,0.00018483795,0.00006315075,0.0021104452,0.00026546782,0.9958857,0.00021158632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024700968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007212824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1476327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021561907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028230684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912531527","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4663353","title":"Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Reading (process); Technical peer review; Publishing; Peer group","score_opus":0.46098422563619834,"score_gpt":0.51296049253763,"score_spread":0.051976266901431645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912531527","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008086917,0.44387797,0.0028803034,0.17243646,0.0022137952,0.0070235636,0.011993664,0.0008979304,0.35058942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055876877,0.66528463,0.0024540653,0.0075650164,0.0008734935,0.000002128694,0.06218085,0.0026196693,0.20314325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717659,0.0027098528,0.0014511321,0.0014561715,0.021447215,0.0011697421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350052,0.0006230236,0.00062700786,0.002794042,0.060217805,0.00073296117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11391809,0.000242696,0.00066700805,0.012055065,0.0026552817,0.007414825,0.004046115,0.0001351345,0.023041716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27189374,0.00019588343,0.00019847651,0.10823295,0.00036815228,0.0013638044,0.0068376875,0.0010875504,0.0031010516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067604806,0.00011759647,0.000036411453,0.0007506652,0.000026401245,0.00022891923,0.00043303557,0.0000021424917,0.00076613616,0.00039155927,0.8779045,0.119335905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016776873,0.00011879079,0.00035986718,0.0026265765,0.000022897944,0.00061105966,0.0010059994,0.00007127357,0.0005163371,0.0002625209,0.99402076,0.00021613037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049922648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013946462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22140668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003276693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008039593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912544719","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4550438","title":"Analysis of Earth Science Research Output: A Scientometric Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Web of science; Earth observation; Scientometrics; Earth system science; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.6331093409719486,"score_gpt":0.5237898501723086,"score_spread":0.10931949079963998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912544719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91407245,0.0001652261,0.0051087188,0.0012547638,0.00014426422,0.0010409247,0.0002599141,0.00023703037,0.077716716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986081,0.000037056878,0.00024292758,0.00007853019,0.00006868692,7.8816896e-8,0.0000531789,0.00025660318,0.00065481616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736527,0.0016976332,0.0009808822,0.0017135739,0.020773878,0.0011812957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97360885,0.0012151251,0.00033947075,0.0016473453,0.021884248,0.0013049385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0714672,0.00018170298,0.0005345036,0.15890698,0.0048623527,0.009761896,0.011637623,0.00007184832,0.01041912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14942785,0.00015111065,0.00021027584,0.67914253,0.0017558748,0.001095977,0.009960236,0.0006662006,0.005727537],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002728905,0.0026174197,0.011978955,0.000040065246,0.00053824304,0.000068137626,0.013173415,0.0013963878,0.025142252,0.0047570616,0.07279688,0.8672183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001329979,0.0032763728,0.29399222,0.000009693755,0.000120380304,0.000011841143,0.01432295,0.03783676,0.0021860066,0.00032601765,0.6461436,0.0004441615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006374756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010677663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86677414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018331857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006950716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912644048","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6363362","title":"Bibliometrics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Visibility; Field (mathematics); Thematic map; Portrait","score_opus":0.5157524444945333,"score_gpt":0.4558979313338611,"score_spread":0.059854513160672196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912644048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010543432,0.001177803,0.0016198707,0.0009497659,0.00062342366,0.00060863554,0.0016372616,0.0005069422,0.99277085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014093082,0.004279331,0.00043288403,0.00043936342,0.000612289,1.12621066e-7,0.0035521311,0.00475346,0.97183734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98127496,0.0004956975,0.0010828297,0.0016716361,0.014550135,0.00092475006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876573,0.0010680429,0.0006784267,0.0021557887,0.007606273,0.00083416374],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021886827,0.0003931775,0.0005711715,0.22010899,0.005437496,0.012708191,0.010801325,0.00030731462,0.42225343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032739405,0.0003655367,0.00035687507,0.16332437,0.00043310484,0.000731567,0.013537865,0.0015541898,0.062470082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021382903,0.00005854094,0.000001692283,0.0000118190865,0.00003617691,0.000048788388,0.0000656184,0.000016114654,0.000041761636,0.06536435,0.5736446,0.36068916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033044585,0.0004076461,0.00013252211,0.000011227786,0.000015543501,0.00012452758,0.000073200674,0.00017782183,0.000014472769,0.014465496,0.98384374,0.0004033411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001554614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8523014e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41019917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007239389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030550775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912710652","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8120964","title":"Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); European union; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.3545861461575004,"score_gpt":0.4552428240772219,"score_spread":0.1006566779197215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912710652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19300184,0.04262881,0.010297232,0.020392757,0.00985308,0.005775519,0.0063331444,0.0057119173,0.7060057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88915867,0.022488391,0.0006167339,0.0006446538,0.0023793327,3.928879e-7,0.0048604063,0.0052902624,0.074561164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98439753,0.0015417178,0.0011255818,0.0018750707,0.009036466,0.00202361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892919,0.001106252,0.0004115599,0.0020258995,0.0057360064,0.0014283763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021305056,0.00043075724,0.00053809554,0.03523928,0.0068768407,0.017149748,0.00878767,0.0003081819,0.042372398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03322373,0.0004020741,0.000297396,0.12868592,0.00078035484,0.0010473651,0.012707042,0.00094918883,0.34866643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007366061,0.00025704506,0.00009638269,0.00005284751,0.0001966405,0.00016625054,0.0010141644,0.00008598829,0.0010321257,0.0014534504,0.6306347,0.3649367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008300502,0.00052309333,0.0044492455,0.000041052706,0.000064144326,0.000022502605,0.00082123064,0.005649558,0.000488533,0.0014035931,0.9852418,0.00046521288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010030933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016636465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005638515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054841425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912770179","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6366634","title":"Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Hyperlink; Precision and recall; Set (abstract data type); Tag cloud; Completeness (order theory); Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.6353235009814185,"score_gpt":0.5617049702212744,"score_spread":0.07361853076014413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912770179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90053886,0.0012416411,0.023765102,0.0037498986,0.0016230812,0.0040217177,0.0020918758,0.00011837953,0.06284943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965414,0.0011316413,0.0013263961,0.00005344202,0.000046155223,1.7367341e-7,0.0004152838,0.00019942244,0.00028611804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98306596,0.0031414854,0.0010685131,0.0013985113,0.010870189,0.0004553128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068236,0.0009878171,0.00095225533,0.004164871,0.00301197,0.00020074692],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064227805,0.0001718672,0.00034156174,0.020811955,0.0020320027,0.005827906,0.021271143,0.000093106995,0.003181475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036205273,0.00010956667,0.00008614522,0.08649674,0.0007774474,0.0010424173,0.0475655,0.0009924868,0.000045538312],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166313,0.00094782526,0.0055407877,0.0001350676,0.000031830947,0.000007394631,0.0026801233,0.0009076125,0.0046965256,0.0034227658,0.056304526,0.9252639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011025466,0.0008160401,0.42509905,0.00016559094,0.000045559336,0.000047995287,0.0103871925,0.05679414,0.00038296412,0.012177092,0.49251282,0.00046901946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041131087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008870427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92479485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030008506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001041228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912809736","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8120965","title":"Aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um den KDSF und die KFiD","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); European union; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.3545861461575004,"score_gpt":0.4552428240772219,"score_spread":0.1006566779197215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912809736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19300184,0.04262881,0.010297232,0.020392757,0.00985308,0.005775519,0.0063331444,0.0057119173,0.7060057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88915867,0.022488391,0.0006167339,0.0006446538,0.0023793327,3.928879e-7,0.0048604063,0.0052902624,0.074561164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98439753,0.0015417178,0.0011255818,0.0018750707,0.009036466,0.00202361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892919,0.001106252,0.0004115599,0.0020258995,0.0057360064,0.0014283763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021305056,0.00043075724,0.00053809554,0.03523928,0.0068768407,0.017149748,0.00878767,0.0003081819,0.042372398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03322373,0.0004020741,0.000297396,0.12868592,0.00078035484,0.0010473651,0.012707042,0.00094918883,0.34866643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007366061,0.00025704506,0.00009638269,0.00005284751,0.0001966405,0.00016625054,0.0010141644,0.00008598829,0.0010321257,0.0014534504,0.6306347,0.3649367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008300502,0.00052309333,0.0044492455,0.000041052706,0.000064144326,0.000022502605,0.00082123064,0.005649558,0.000488533,0.0014035931,0.9852418,0.00046521288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010030933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016636465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005638515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054841425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912988133","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8428888","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Open government; Compliance (psychology); Exploratory research","score_opus":0.3536032678883995,"score_gpt":0.4641034051616275,"score_spread":0.110500137273228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912988133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676133,0.0000892727,0.0028069534,0.006123956,0.00018789088,0.0013604702,0.00026708387,0.00015650748,0.021394571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891216,0.00012193904,0.00011540116,0.00007885389,0.000031068317,1.8142904e-7,0.00017231805,0.00015421056,0.000413843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958969,0.00037864753,0.00026156195,0.00068931445,0.002175868,0.0005977553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949938,0.00040661142,0.00017596618,0.0005244223,0.003276755,0.0006224441],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011235402,0.0001302787,0.00021763453,0.028395168,0.0036483856,0.02999125,0.004638351,0.000045739893,0.00044796642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008148908,0.000091089896,0.000024124995,0.14701948,0.0003844147,0.0016481633,0.00376651,0.00018882379,0.0002438051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025346526,0.00014167478,0.003758718,0.000046179266,0.000076398195,0.00005628425,0.0017256163,0.00322095,0.0032222227,0.0063920426,0.35352674,0.6275797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013639204,0.0015202427,0.22451635,0.00008828528,0.000009460006,0.000032151216,0.0027288196,0.050953638,0.0040627597,0.0006952241,0.7136264,0.00040278764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010390737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031200345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62717694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020925466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007159208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920271294","doi":"10.60692/5tgdj-h6x53","title":"Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The Internet; Index (typography); Value (mathematics); Spelling; MEDLINE; Inclusion (mineral); Reputation","score_opus":0.4857430438870848,"score_gpt":0.4907130379714074,"score_spread":0.0049699940843226376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920271294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97553086,0.000022802978,0.020295307,0.00034021525,0.0012069677,0.00027703363,0.0003349059,0.000034897945,0.0019570177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989265,0.0000013380281,0.00007072788,0.00007429399,0.0001796852,0.000018903545,0.000006550549,0.000004749744,0.00071725715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175626,0.00017070591,0.001229762,0.00030668487,0.006097521,0.00043904045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569404,0.00014263293,0.0010582338,0.00093809754,0.0017732269,0.00039377416],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011949396,0.00016053973,0.00029049374,0.009465241,0.0020829441,0.022859702,0.002162467,0.00016623648,0.00020056992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033403474,0.00008436959,0.00011398037,0.0059133386,0.00051281403,0.0019884687,0.0007923271,0.00030620542,0.000525468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025003981,0.0000037523087,0.99266875,0.00001891167,0.000016387106,0.0000030565209,0.0026910035,0.000012103797,0.000004473991,0.000065703134,0.00063959917,0.003851236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057994423,0.00004224711,0.97145295,0.000014162604,0.000004421891,0.00008544501,0.002401061,0.023336235,0.000055546538,0.000024300845,0.0018949461,0.00010871483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055479806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.1949844e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023395643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010271978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013227967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920588494","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25264615","title":"Research Output of Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS): A Bibliometric Analysis from 1993-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"San Jose State University Scholar Works (San Jose State University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Information science; Information system; National library","score_opus":0.1606105128631694,"score_gpt":0.3883325212760997,"score_spread":0.22772200841293028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920588494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98284006,0.001820855,0.0053012804,0.00033420717,0.0004222835,0.0002566075,0.0011468068,0.000026263417,0.007851616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880068,0.0056688455,0.0027130581,0.000017002085,0.000030864638,5.163553e-8,0.000033955363,0.000014195439,0.0035152605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900425,0.0011492742,0.0008490245,0.0008866069,0.006930169,0.0011806793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867922,0.003132465,0.0005419104,0.0009043616,0.006357331,0.0022716979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020326866,0.00028383234,0.0006650273,0.85518944,0.0015411235,0.0071352776,0.004597502,0.00018947873,0.0011138489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006144246,0.0002698109,0.00039138793,0.9048476,0.0019369758,0.019233223,0.0016042962,0.0018366084,0.0001041066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006609353,0.00017657146,0.25101134,0.000065159686,0.0011697491,0.003255517,0.010407076,0.0021978389,0.00048763168,0.0023253243,0.015250874,0.71299195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018660286,0.00062340166,0.46857214,0.0002618452,0.000324872,0.000016052112,0.039539833,0.0074994154,0.0007238754,0.0031331452,0.4767413,0.00069806183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015374386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048084394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006950676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005616066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920781019","doi":"10.60692/p6ayr-4bd79","title":"A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Research Canada; Alberta Innovates","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Multidisciplinary approach; Investment (military); Impact assessment; Gender bias; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Economic impact analysis; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.8458960979796117,"score_gpt":0.6419427642089373,"score_spread":0.20395333377067448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920781019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7809334,0.0000021136022,0.21204089,0.0003143814,0.00034589684,0.0009286884,0.00029340573,0.00003429357,0.005106955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853295,2.820087e-7,0.0007632551,0.000059469927,0.000072159586,0.00019233425,0.0000036970855,0.000005219545,0.00037063335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900873,0.00037569014,0.0010882833,0.00040206665,0.0072409557,0.0008057473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938863,0.00052531133,0.0002249592,0.00068659784,0.0042194156,0.00045743998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033959683,0.0001431701,0.00027693756,0.034987003,0.00023928263,0.0021123113,0.0011742507,0.00014510559,0.00009780255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060954997,0.0000743821,0.00013164824,0.066717304,0.00004125466,0.0017580532,0.00050755177,0.00010764168,0.0017363012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001297572,0.000007051606,0.95925677,0.00003022328,0.000012412476,0.0000017170535,0.004574785,0.00012882761,0.000016034579,0.00046265143,0.010008597,0.025371153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011555767,0.00018874698,0.98696786,0.000031334916,0.0000014864881,0.000008210724,0.004083162,0.0037279096,0.00008958334,0.00016038962,0.0034503636,0.0001353845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007961722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064871356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21759957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024830538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037267464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920871362","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.22721474","title":"Additional file 1 of Differences in collaboration structures and impact among prominent researchers in Europe and North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.27774964472061875,"score_gpt":0.48997942837143066,"score_spread":0.2122297836508119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920871362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644253,0.00012855478,8.367911e-7,0.0019181661,0.000047484566,0.0004627462,0.031854067,0.0000046420046,0.0011581746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961252,0.002693411,0.00065094186,0.00005507975,0.00006794824,0.000031505995,0.0002227094,0.000011874799,0.00014130611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921817,0.00035754475,0.0015834718,0.0013892861,0.0018879839,0.0026000072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97799265,0.014538476,0.00036612642,0.00055992434,0.0025290705,0.004013772],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015231136,0.00027198566,0.00087418343,0.018183738,0.00034807547,0.0015376824,0.0016395944,0.00015283986,0.0060808095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10586949,0.00020808596,0.00007300901,0.036700077,0.012444842,0.0018272231,0.0019833965,0.0007059882,0.00001811008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024358202,0.00029903284,0.81079036,0.000084466206,0.000021903314,0.00001168853,0.00017232307,0.00017459448,0.00038822545,0.16895181,0.007816516,0.011045496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056707853,0.00068459817,0.9181279,0.00005757757,0.00000242045,0.000005666601,0.0013850648,0.036122393,0.0001242555,0.040961493,0.0017509967,0.00021055591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037662867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022466176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12799032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049205683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055739996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924941821","doi":"10.15468/dl.txcrp3","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Download; Alien; Range (aeronautics); The Internet","score_opus":0.2850051239238738,"score_gpt":0.442292210992941,"score_spread":0.15728708706906724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924941821","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005209811,0.0000664106,0.0000110798655,0.00033793657,0.0015970116,0.00035620807,0.9966429,0.000043277516,0.00042423385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000018428522,0.00015304542,0.0000012763443,0.0005041774,0.0000014614805,0.000006203639,0.9993141,1.1333281e-8,0.0000012488689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839992,0.0003573985,0.0010046259,0.00061882247,0.013394816,0.0006251394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383914,0.00063470134,0.00075677194,0.0015033889,0.0027398807,0.0005261233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011796429,0.00029616902,0.00045246637,0.015148468,0.000955487,0.0029842255,0.0052765366,0.0003205727,0.24711043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018636547,0.00025030144,0.0003405292,0.08079067,0.00028481247,0.0022277725,0.004042524,0.00070501113,0.30301476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034387092,0.00006176851,0.0054810564,0.000017700011,0.000014671923,0.00000456735,0.000019009365,0.000018858185,1.5816566e-8,1.5407532e-7,0.9810686,0.013279218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027278755,0.00007449807,0.0005789977,2.8922477e-7,0.000012483212,0.0000053209174,0.00030437877,7.1493804e-7,6.8182305e-7,0.000010259269,0.99846756,0.0002719959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071833265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008884078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0656422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083629845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054566783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929663426","doi":"10.5063/f1736pc4","title":"A List With Traits of all Herptile Species Within Central California Deserts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"UC Santa Barbara","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Arid; Population; Biodiversity; Download","score_opus":0.4447425893510646,"score_gpt":0.5036460230111919,"score_spread":0.05890343366012729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929663426","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023766886,0.0005854703,0.000041503907,0.00017110686,0.00091487326,0.000509869,0.97332597,0.00004770781,0.00063663814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024140602,0.002023762,0.00076343794,0.00046278944,0.0007875484,0.000074346375,0.96284854,0.00014009705,0.008758851],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981679,0.00032213976,0.0014903195,0.0014580991,0.013696892,0.0013535095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919195,0.002918252,0.00086480606,0.0016670316,0.0017715857,0.0008588197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008524232,0.0005388625,0.0011523048,0.040784813,0.0002455059,0.0027343042,0.0053053703,0.00047144992,0.0025167677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013856413,0.00034009063,0.00032247417,0.11262935,0.00069626333,0.0003521013,0.0011561762,0.0008670508,0.0034429883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010257751,0.00017826077,0.002124541,0.000060683175,0.00008526303,0.00024207459,0.00009183679,0.000037209586,0.00014837377,0.000015948392,0.99577945,0.0011337937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005219832,0.00036705323,0.023218926,0.00010430989,0.000053598593,0.00003311355,0.0003330013,0.00032296576,0.000223316,0.00025993778,0.9740781,0.00048366582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022498255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002930856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07184453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020195778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010669569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929945980","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11327643","title":"Pipistrellus (Perimyotis) subflavus F. Cuvier 1832","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Subgenus; Hibernation (computing); Taxonomy (biology)","score_opus":0.40463206834564636,"score_gpt":0.4620920326806788,"score_spread":0.05745996433503242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929945980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19124907,0.0011178064,0.016273785,0.0077225105,0.00062516297,0.0008771489,0.00042303273,0.0009789459,0.7807325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840238,0.00026634158,0.0008726968,0.00028627506,0.00037979914,4.7580123e-8,0.00022179785,0.0006887432,0.013260508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914561,0.00061844994,0.00067286333,0.00096766825,0.0054081683,0.0008767824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934664,0.0003714019,0.00020803312,0.0012249985,0.0040472317,0.00068195636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011267234,0.0001962039,0.00026558078,0.013753714,0.0029040903,0.007933352,0.005155396,0.00011809577,0.065966986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02066704,0.00016551948,0.00014498679,0.048443913,0.00034112143,0.0009063774,0.0032990158,0.0004608466,0.08412435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026734957,0.0001535622,0.000049761413,0.000004651066,0.000012571822,0.0000129208265,0.00026117385,0.00006861974,0.0019399871,0.0024222957,0.37135154,0.6236962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004700935,0.00018720659,0.002980732,0.0000060656494,0.0000043336818,0.00008359414,0.00023981144,0.0024704472,0.0011433853,0.0006658967,0.99153936,0.00020905244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021538199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.6309586e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79277474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003148991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014330927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6929978722","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10854688","title":"L'Observatoire des cultures écrites anciennes Biblissima+","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Belgica; Web site; Indigenous","score_opus":0.42757642540885615,"score_gpt":0.47507315517081344,"score_spread":0.04749672976195729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6929978722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18326667,0.2589543,0.029295424,0.035846405,0.007727353,0.0020406493,0.005162593,0.0036359956,0.47407064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80871356,0.031704318,0.005199129,0.0008148706,0.002303889,2.890975e-7,0.0016360029,0.004319053,0.14530887],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962355,0.0011364317,0.0008117179,0.001565466,0.005299491,0.0015633409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901223,0.0009558642,0.0001397697,0.0010734169,0.0066038943,0.0011047344],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014281564,0.00036823383,0.00037803478,0.03456079,0.006110039,0.04231738,0.0056335526,0.00027483274,0.06820932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027573194,0.00031252488,0.0002842706,0.18547338,0.0016899897,0.0030070834,0.0050570127,0.0009100161,0.053922802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648318,0.00015201067,0.00003986983,0.00016257238,0.000039992516,0.000103340775,0.0010229263,0.000024274912,0.0015108505,0.009236762,0.4615363,0.52615464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026148363,0.00040159523,0.0021832064,0.00023113136,0.000024838571,0.00031639234,0.0014524657,0.010158141,0.00063266465,0.006677099,0.97728115,0.0003798056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013613956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023025648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6254469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052466814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930042006","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11986003","title":"business plan esempio pratico pdf","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business plan; Plan (archaeology); Action plan","score_opus":0.32836154048172783,"score_gpt":0.4281970351296924,"score_spread":0.0998354946479646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930042006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056136993,0.0021521263,0.004016641,0.0029238244,0.0018274859,0.0013186232,0.0014467328,0.0007018623,0.98505133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016672945,0.0021108128,0.0003658072,0.0003017507,0.0011945539,1.6999077e-7,0.0018190427,0.008163895,0.969371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98312175,0.0013504261,0.0012856785,0.0025667434,0.009991883,0.00168352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849002,0.00054475677,0.00060561585,0.0023082483,0.010408701,0.0012325293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01531529,0.0006713442,0.0008165389,0.05434666,0.0031003742,0.033511527,0.010145105,0.0006257128,0.6000083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04189971,0.0005767524,0.00029600132,0.14343224,0.00086129515,0.0007226894,0.010227283,0.0015879424,0.7849882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047557904,0.00023479392,0.00000914964,0.00023543919,0.00013061601,0.00014867316,0.00054044044,0.000013556037,0.00030104376,0.0021058181,0.8558836,0.14034928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056494144,0.0003650343,0.00066107145,0.00027547003,0.00005336378,0.00019814035,0.00080828165,0.0008529007,0.000053009135,0.0011374064,0.9943721,0.0006582504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086626045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015325529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18497993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000589857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007579005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930221110","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11475507","title":"Towards a methodology for monitoring and evaluating living labs: Insights from the early stages within the SCORE Project","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Work (physics); Program evaluation; Risk assessment","score_opus":0.688844935209892,"score_gpt":0.5342244836948993,"score_spread":0.1546204515149927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930221110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561649,0.0052411417,0.023861226,0.0034995584,0.00095099903,0.0016305258,0.0003115208,0.00040718733,0.007932934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948915,0.00016324116,0.0033473517,0.000074340365,0.0004281307,6.179446e-7,0.000030365734,0.00037093792,0.00069349183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324197,0.0022487347,0.00045821842,0.00076347607,0.0028742286,0.00041336013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880745,0.008521325,0.00015687433,0.00069658057,0.0023989312,0.0001518058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029016282,0.00014517996,0.00019109508,0.0044911504,0.003294053,0.013141706,0.0028716954,0.000075910524,0.00058055925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08088709,0.0000774882,0.000080278376,0.025734369,0.00031794072,0.00055237446,0.0031764323,0.00046647768,0.0004348215],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072167844,0.00005421099,0.00062202656,0.000045697194,0.00012244456,0.000012624025,0.024233392,0.000048654394,0.011237315,0.012667081,0.040749248,0.91013515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066507066,0.0014978735,0.068655744,0.00029962152,0.000073424,0.0000743511,0.017257217,0.027640896,0.0032475612,0.035899147,0.8441691,0.00052001566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016935861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017068794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010647911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003815738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930339551","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.13968114","title":"Supplemental files for Evolutionary rescue during extreme drought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Extreme environment; SNP; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Scripting language; Data file; Baseline (sea)","score_opus":0.3535110500136546,"score_gpt":0.4441385042591202,"score_spread":0.09062745424546559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930339551","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043205265,0.00072864955,0.0003643969,0.0010889161,0.0008079204,0.0010737104,0.991293,0.00029055477,0.003920776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001456285,0.00068157125,0.00038992584,0.00006910332,0.0007521214,6.188896e-7,0.9901911,0.0009853552,0.0054739425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887691,0.0006026661,0.0010318082,0.0017379235,0.00673879,0.0011196733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927725,0.00068650953,0.00027856263,0.0016662506,0.0040172017,0.000578944],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009765826,0.00037820093,0.0004623541,0.028660642,0.003956506,0.0108795725,0.0073783454,0.0002960307,0.08696543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023017986,0.00032884482,0.00033008723,0.042709716,0.00035291127,0.00065300864,0.008390628,0.0008665413,0.07243765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078155055,0.00016851192,0.0000014319972,0.00016443346,0.00006309492,0.000049071856,0.000058777474,0.0000148980735,0.0002750778,0.00021232085,0.98624146,0.01267274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005452347,0.0002921902,0.00026211177,0.000057446272,0.00002892007,0.00012538861,0.00027161604,0.0004719536,0.000073047806,0.0010732395,0.9964243,0.0003745605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064395004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041980647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014527773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069192954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003977766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930378085","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11738663","title":"Iso 4200 pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; International standard; Table (database); Welding; Unit (ring theory)","score_opus":0.3566808685002366,"score_gpt":0.45931338496297125,"score_spread":0.10263251646273464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930378085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027040009,0.0019244399,0.0021648186,0.0009820014,0.00080178777,0.00048188597,0.00069907436,0.0008873451,0.99203163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018811559,0.0006325038,0.00026103915,0.00014073303,0.00059042807,4.5451657e-8,0.0005193566,0.0068151318,0.9891596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975796,0.00059164397,0.00060214655,0.0014221815,0.006806795,0.0008192638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951195,0.00021686639,0.00028001986,0.0015748636,0.0022001711,0.0006085536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01005623,0.00029716932,0.0004019082,0.045755688,0.0010397029,0.013549,0.006609204,0.0003109972,0.5514596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017638816,0.00024352538,0.0002055347,0.07181598,0.00034774304,0.00024403303,0.005514457,0.00078908575,0.7172512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073160168,0.00006557665,0.000001306269,0.00003712301,0.000039483042,0.00003979104,0.00008051571,0.0000013088052,0.0000702193,0.001787718,0.8520387,0.14583093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020173509,0.00014626818,0.000045999524,0.00005775427,0.000012367119,0.000058505255,0.00013841911,0.00019464042,0.000023278222,0.002081211,0.9967605,0.00027935262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055837914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011404464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1657916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022636581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015805268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930432289","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11691582","title":"The art spirit pdf","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Art world; Art methodology; Modern art; Contemporary art; Individualism; Anthropology of art; Hierarchy; Appeal; Frontier","score_opus":0.33600579048130935,"score_gpt":0.4560512700818824,"score_spread":0.12004547960057305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930432289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008319036,0.0023997787,0.0011998047,0.003570466,0.0008525441,0.00048195815,0.0003379332,0.0005813341,0.99056786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058918126,0.0011410245,0.00009780139,0.0001138678,0.00051521056,6.167539e-8,0.00026621405,0.004644487,0.99263215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903037,0.0006286818,0.000566711,0.0010908043,0.0066246805,0.0007854321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950624,0.00043891548,0.0002744116,0.0016740544,0.0020906131,0.0004596149],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014488163,0.00024767514,0.0002864823,0.02178203,0.002158219,0.021313524,0.0075559667,0.00022011217,0.27438867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023459109,0.00016099011,0.00018969817,0.056041062,0.0005134209,0.00017624507,0.005424211,0.0007787856,0.75125796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006904834,0.000032675885,7.557628e-7,0.000015799527,0.00003430626,0.000020137408,0.000038277474,7.10416e-7,0.000028071812,0.0032819812,0.821085,0.1754554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001407882,0.000113331276,0.00003763362,0.000037898728,0.000009388058,0.00004388597,0.00013508745,0.00015141713,0.000013424947,0.002531984,0.99658674,0.000198432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002006978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021222222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47686926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017810185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014681591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930521914","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1179270","title":"How To Find A Balance Between Bibliometric And Societal Impact In Academia.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Balance (ability); Sustainability science; Section (typography); Sustainable development; Bibliometrics; Global Leadership","score_opus":0.4067474857303525,"score_gpt":0.495141150820893,"score_spread":0.08839366509054047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930521914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97313875,0.00026811907,0.0053855656,0.0047461186,0.00009538168,0.00048113955,0.00029806801,0.00014021966,0.01544666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969604,0.0001341191,0.00042766836,0.00016258543,0.00024592644,5.045371e-8,0.000058738788,0.00029560286,0.0017148949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328434,0.00048559977,0.0004384644,0.0009077392,0.004041511,0.00084233406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946777,0.00067506713,0.00015447364,0.0006448938,0.0030547518,0.00079306174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014162613,0.00017034166,0.00029409266,0.1779992,0.0014187425,0.009799697,0.0032484967,0.00026124608,0.0040817056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04511365,0.00013684068,0.00008026251,0.49840128,0.0003628387,0.000955313,0.0037826519,0.0008426745,0.005464492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003801255,0.00006849486,0.011694323,0.00000839506,0.000019000418,0.000008106713,0.00065691804,0.0000046428268,0.0037129333,0.00020878733,0.2936541,0.68992627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004199302,0.0005422928,0.4584277,0.000009134363,0.0000025160268,0.000021020991,0.00023327665,0.0005923908,0.00030284212,0.00061467174,0.5386713,0.00016290495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003064031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5110627e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68976337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024822057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014764567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931287278","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4632038","title":"Dataset for: Effective structural unit analysis in hexagonal close packed alloys – reconstruction of prior beta microstructures &amp; crystal orientation post processing analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Microstructure; Phase (matter); Crystal (programming language); Plane (geometry); Grain boundary; Pole figure; Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.16907051121588798,"score_gpt":0.44130938987542334,"score_spread":0.27223887865953533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931287278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980027,0.00014114546,0.00774884,0.0003183334,0.00009794641,0.000522169,0.010547044,0.000040995827,0.0005564926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726358,0.000026406284,0.0023872308,0.00003637237,0.000044584514,1.8574069e-7,0.02461363,0.0001265231,0.0001292625],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941254,0.00095612847,0.0008281261,0.0009951758,0.0025800196,0.0005151234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060696,0.0006034677,0.00048550486,0.0007508417,0.0072962563,0.00025693845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065077594,0.00018014394,0.00048392618,0.024578033,0.0012819171,0.0029234928,0.0014751949,0.00011105692,0.0052551576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01540962,0.00015978634,0.00025117246,0.11700111,0.00029987327,0.0008238543,0.0011250282,0.0002803197,0.000105464016],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082495087,0.00035400988,0.031651016,0.00015385631,0.0018921354,0.000025983238,0.0029624808,0.0020598187,0.089984864,0.0016090855,0.014252102,0.8542297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025153095,0.0004310042,0.78251046,0.000030043944,0.00088567886,0.00012061036,0.0034578054,0.01177947,0.009378848,0.0028811856,0.18538728,0.0006222805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009820278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009025775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8536074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002151096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004518111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931358340","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.5911327","title":"Entanglements in Fishing Gear and Strandings Reported to the Whale Release and Strandings Group in Newfoundland and Labrador and a Summary of the Whale Release and Strandings Program during 2020.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whale; Fishing; Commercial fishing; Marine mammal; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chondrichthyes","score_opus":0.19789458600713042,"score_gpt":0.40873288866604773,"score_spread":0.21083830265891731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931358340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99117464,0.002619812,0.00001732694,0.0012821017,0.000098837714,0.0014585892,0.00028099655,0.000042454292,0.0030252375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852902,0.012792496,0.000106759246,0.00003897888,0.00006173878,8.4226616e-7,0.0001288935,0.00024604905,0.0013339991],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99305046,0.0005990358,0.0010098215,0.0012689257,0.003440737,0.00063105056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966163,0.0004960642,0.0004794869,0.00061715447,0.0012955001,0.00049549015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01161846,0.0003012326,0.00054782076,0.005712638,0.0013041766,0.0062523875,0.0010286574,0.00019114697,0.00042276323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014486374,0.00021602063,0.000060478596,0.018046748,0.00049207284,0.0007158775,0.0034639467,0.00082413736,0.0000066514694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010286059,0.00059608446,0.2476455,0.0019601285,0.00030199977,0.0010857423,0.0139866,0.000017807493,0.0067819343,0.00023059288,0.039604183,0.68676084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003280755,0.0006319177,0.7523453,0.00093582366,0.00006649397,0.0010482077,0.004695201,0.0006231206,0.000121489036,0.00020803748,0.23550066,0.0005429937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016531104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003675046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68621784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026886634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048108446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931515937","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.8428887","title":"Collaboration networks and their effects on open access uptake: Analyzing how authors of a Canadian federal science department comply with mandates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Open government; Compliance (psychology); Exploratory research","score_opus":0.3536032678883995,"score_gpt":0.4641034051616275,"score_spread":0.110500137273228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931515937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676133,0.0000892727,0.0028069534,0.006123956,0.00018789088,0.0013604702,0.00026708387,0.00015650748,0.021394571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891216,0.00012193904,0.00011540116,0.00007885389,0.000031068317,1.8142904e-7,0.00017231805,0.00015421056,0.000413843],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958969,0.00037864753,0.00026156195,0.00068931445,0.002175868,0.0005977553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949938,0.00040661142,0.00017596618,0.0005244223,0.003276755,0.0006224441],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011235402,0.0001302787,0.00021763453,0.028395168,0.0036483856,0.02999125,0.004638351,0.000045739893,0.00044796642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008148908,0.000091089896,0.000024124995,0.14701948,0.0003844147,0.0016481633,0.00376651,0.00018882379,0.0002438051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025346526,0.00014167478,0.003758718,0.000046179266,0.000076398195,0.00005628425,0.0017256163,0.00322095,0.0032222227,0.0063920426,0.35352674,0.6275797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013639204,0.0015202427,0.22451635,0.00008828528,0.000009460006,0.000032151216,0.0027288196,0.050953638,0.0040627597,0.0006952241,0.7136264,0.00040278764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010390737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031200345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62717694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020925466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007159208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931550187","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4768663","title":"Review of Exploring the interaction network of a synthetic gut bacterial community","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enterococcus faecalis; Club; Chen; Metabolic network; Metabolite","score_opus":0.6443149448925659,"score_gpt":0.496246567241253,"score_spread":0.14806837765131292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931550187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007368225,0.4193872,0.0036330533,0.07623229,0.015645893,0.0074288426,0.0067757075,0.0005578053,0.462971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02115944,0.9465332,0.0003370625,0.0019010425,0.0012984067,0.0000017881198,0.007672856,0.0018676625,0.01922851],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98621047,0.005781237,0.0015193617,0.0005932322,0.0053910976,0.00050461286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781753,0.0024517959,0.0013000031,0.0026131927,0.015214389,0.00024533007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042033758,0.00024203699,0.00089252763,0.0046712626,0.001740405,0.0015961321,0.0071735363,0.00010755186,0.048774656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11763299,0.00017039281,0.00037377494,0.05338434,0.0003890147,0.00039718737,0.007445488,0.0013638051,0.0013872773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013571238,0.00009860778,7.784674e-7,0.0036747628,0.00003697212,0.0000020379437,0.000086561326,0.0000067932024,0.000068678884,0.00007650528,0.7384009,0.25753385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011999057,0.00017965431,0.00013129466,0.012626594,0.000054348482,0.000046646175,0.00018596159,0.00004337152,0.00005627653,0.00013087994,0.9862766,0.00014835138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001052944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018368886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52714604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021536696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050919167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931974892","doi":"10.5683/sp3/pdzqmg","title":"Demo: Questions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type); Natural (archaeology); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.46743207111117513,"score_gpt":0.5929958498575951,"score_spread":0.12556377874642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931974892","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000013957454,0.0008752474,0.0002539065,0.0011390004,0.0006839928,0.00020705783,0.98226875,0.00002633202,0.014544307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000039610422,0.0014250858,0.00019202237,0.00043551627,0.00020674126,0.000029706649,0.98994684,0.000004338834,0.0077557904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875431,0.00031347544,0.0008188059,0.0009582131,0.009776959,0.0005894503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877226,0.0055063623,0.0003103013,0.0027910848,0.0032292856,0.00044039643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012374224,0.0002440332,0.00050049956,0.09462476,0.00029981942,0.0032521992,0.0059293318,0.0004543202,0.00096966885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1006983,0.00017015514,0.0002716312,0.1655846,0.00016380656,0.00021388785,0.0015052108,0.0006064267,0.00017317623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032054566,0.00006621499,0.00007589756,0.000007880544,0.000015601923,0.000025729973,0.0000017415767,0.0000022152635,3.627095e-7,0.00020734328,0.9747641,0.024829706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101904625,0.000035839563,0.0014529835,0.000020648891,0.000018654315,0.000003421982,0.00001173909,0.00004744183,0.0000036910312,0.0038226724,0.99429816,0.00018283653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033471383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066956077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08832408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014628899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085107156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939288627","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12703760.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Quantifying professionalism in peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Inclusion (mineral); Diagram; Data flow diagram; File format","score_opus":0.9313384607065003,"score_gpt":0.6506207366814617,"score_spread":0.2807177240250386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939288627","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000058582646,0.0015561741,3.5227424e-7,0.0033885927,0.000018744102,0.00016190515,0.9881984,0.00000784903,0.0066621257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014560734,0.000017728393,0.00031480566,0.0017562042,0.000049239996,0.00025832228,0.9928349,0.000006339474,0.0033063355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087226,0.00012111147,0.0004981175,0.0003522788,0.007937775,0.00021846704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713029,0.020699635,0.0003891224,0.00039983966,0.0069310926,0.0002774022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015253241,0.000071708004,0.00023346969,0.005712451,0.00004641332,0.00016404867,0.0012108679,0.000057439192,0.99925435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.60238844,0.000049953236,0.00010642072,0.0892943,0.000010217098,0.000270212,0.00053759164,0.00021622058,0.014532097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016378516,0.00001872392,0.000024450299,0.000106426276,0.0000011254747,0.000007915633,0.000014867188,8.012828e-7,0.0000023755756,0.000005294814,0.9887109,0.011105489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056160236,0.000018014956,0.009121351,0.0052544377,3.2108497e-7,9.787993e-7,0.000030138088,0.00062679814,0.000012577462,0.000095545925,0.98472124,0.00006241915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017888418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016376672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98472226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001923241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027577268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862352},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6939753027","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.27938184","title":"A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-influential papers in the field of anti-diabetic drugs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Scopus; Citation; Citation analysis; Web of science; Field (mathematics); Original research","score_opus":0.28388004818971097,"score_gpt":0.5198092564578533,"score_spread":0.2359292082681423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939753027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351943,0.0049316003,0.0000049794467,0.0014695468,0.00032711754,0.0004972594,0.041704543,0.000019120387,0.015851527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990632,0.000040212126,0.000009798118,0.0002602302,0.000024464267,0.000023762235,0.00030854504,0.000005789793,0.00026397983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145883,0.00028009526,0.00069553294,0.00043505392,0.006780416,0.00035007086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795787,0.018023118,0.00022350154,0.0010503891,0.0010331545,0.00009118731],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005195152,0.000114261755,0.0003517377,0.59808785,0.00007900827,0.0010260355,0.0034607775,0.00010588038,0.069953784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073939726,0.000053918677,0.0004686014,0.9605734,0.000039982406,0.00021302744,0.0006689125,0.00029391758,0.0002004538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012087992,0.0002397712,0.09732033,0.00016505597,0.00038872453,0.000025600611,0.001294436,0.00090540247,0.0009630908,0.00012252973,0.50928587,0.3892771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013784095,0.000073788106,0.90971357,0.00016977756,0.00007778577,8.229483e-7,0.00034814456,0.014073263,0.0018536217,0.00015831334,0.07328136,0.000111736794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012105462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027429585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028557979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018775245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98940843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943892931","doi":"10.17613/t8999-0m368","title":"Scholarly Communication and Its Infrastructures (panel introduction)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Information and Communications Technology; Key (lock); Context (archaeology); Information Dissemination","score_opus":0.3354484500528461,"score_gpt":0.4272444462727673,"score_spread":0.09179599621992118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943892931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250312,0.0035350616,0.00043312524,0.0046792687,0.0005511711,0.00024506295,0.00009640588,0.000067062465,0.06536166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98016924,0.000019486895,0.00008051848,0.000008811952,0.00007396327,0.0000022592624,0.000020455172,0.000009371119,0.019615926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534655,0.0010738027,0.0003097275,0.00061218126,0.002280163,0.0003775926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946785,0.0017033103,0.00017324684,0.0010538708,0.002050957,0.00034012782],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005705972,0.00014442691,0.00024596325,0.03453202,0.0022192874,0.001549719,0.0032901748,0.00007290965,0.0017540078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057495255,0.00014083867,0.00009028755,0.09657025,0.00020773297,0.001889893,0.004394439,0.00082432746,0.00015740031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001764465,0.000640913,0.29935786,0.000015685195,0.00007995833,0.000049475515,0.0024490277,0.00029841907,0.0020495462,0.2757699,0.27584347,0.1432693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004734764,0.000104139304,0.19117431,0.0000018357297,0.000009521108,0.000024408073,0.00089390663,0.00064079865,0.00008882235,0.0034260196,0.80300623,0.000156535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004546492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002237488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52716273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034695357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023528167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943918776","doi":"10.17613/196v7-d0t88","title":"The value of data and other non-traditional scholarly outputs in academic review, promotion, and tenure in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Higher education; Empirical research","score_opus":0.4506510134796159,"score_gpt":0.4351968633074922,"score_spread":0.015454150172123704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943918776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95804036,0.016449807,0.00013864512,0.02297656,0.000048950562,0.00042756845,0.00031186498,0.0000036084102,0.0016026567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980416,0.0016223901,0.000012936608,0.00008599285,0.000011593937,8.3716543e-7,0.000015495847,0.0000041755993,0.00020495849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733835,0.0006275412,0.0003435814,0.0003890723,0.0010778782,0.00022359646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372053,0.0048738853,0.00013714207,0.0004373562,0.00061223976,0.00021885344],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063594445,0.000097598735,0.00025208236,0.005131139,0.00022957628,0.0002684682,0.0015994223,0.000054352087,0.00001092383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070555503,0.000057782472,0.000016584901,0.049433045,0.00049564947,0.0006259804,0.0012074666,0.0005405397,0.0000018884683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166416,0.000039662064,0.9654309,0.000059111924,0.00001592308,0.000016645437,0.00073265296,0.0000072703515,0.000011158662,0.008517388,0.013088932,0.012018648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016411507,0.000058446287,0.69449174,0.0002075695,0.000016475376,0.0000066038347,0.000888965,0.012930964,0.0000079284,0.0016611435,0.28796333,0.0001256764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056151673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82097113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76481944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096236574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006197398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97077173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944010102","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/axmjz","title":"Roles and responsibilities when leading consensus meetings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Process (computing); Grey literature; Inclusion (mineral); Citation; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.5268593757873624,"score_gpt":0.5962216561772558,"score_spread":0.06936228038989334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944010102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065923184,0.0026597695,0.00049688,0.0048223804,0.0024747544,0.0012341542,0.00015389144,0.00033826174,0.9812276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009177221,0.0004884289,0.027329598,0.00034920019,0.00024222143,0.000035602,8.767071e-7,0.00032641293,0.96205044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813539,0.00037569398,0.0008236182,0.0026256228,0.013500925,0.001320241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96362406,0.027361954,0.0010229769,0.0041386536,0.0024935668,0.0013588021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07310994,0.00036576003,0.0008323413,0.06661385,0.0008864183,0.021110276,0.014687201,0.00051455584,0.0034647023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2968166,0.0002616111,0.00010620463,0.15481451,0.0038146945,0.0006439157,0.009938689,0.00081136,0.0026223175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000221125,0.000026549169,0.009278434,0.000008742655,0.000012263085,0.000037478312,0.0006388044,0.0000020031855,0.00008629141,0.01636202,0.8777765,0.09574878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016886933,0.00010101215,0.0027469392,0.00042304953,0.000007570969,0.000011992987,0.0022387311,0.00030147136,0.00011493378,0.124784574,0.8685962,0.0005046608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011416414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063928263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22370663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018066593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012208468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945417661","doi":"10.22034/jkrs.2024.63510.1108","title":"The participation of International Authors in Journals indexed in Islamic World Science Citation Database (ISC)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Descriptive statistics; Citation; Islam; China; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.3059271438834543,"score_gpt":0.4890691025125425,"score_spread":0.18314195862908816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945417661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98931646,0.00074233714,0.0012536832,0.0011644177,0.0009413572,0.00014196041,0.0000144049345,0.000010607763,0.0064147892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947692,0.00023761347,0.00047554023,0.000006308731,0.000024691155,6.476768e-7,0.000002870506,0.0000036613583,0.004479465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396515,0.0002319823,0.00054888055,0.00044766307,0.0045130956,0.0002932349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961883,0.0017555663,0.00032886057,0.00036364276,0.001274765,0.00008888861],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013102977,0.00008391716,0.00019076088,0.030484082,0.0005493795,0.0011440964,0.0020832473,0.00004388508,0.00014718853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005589533,0.00006809734,0.000090236026,0.1002688,0.0005502641,0.0019355587,0.00075563515,0.00027508737,0.00001706595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043523495,0.0008420884,0.53713065,0.00006227168,0.00008779777,0.0003443567,0.016549982,0.0021235,0.23492964,0.019787868,0.01863069,0.16907592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005041147,0.00009715399,0.8925386,0.00016197296,0.000008182737,0.0000079309475,0.007552993,0.082150936,0.005466504,0.003490912,0.007863077,0.00015762585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007074998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014773482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35540792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000345534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005239318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6945697183","doi":"10.25547/3xdw-4b96","title":"Le libre accès dans les sciences humaines au Canada : une conversation","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Textual Cultures Lab","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human science; Conversation; Portrait; Emic and etic","score_opus":0.16176292211199744,"score_gpt":0.4612688097973625,"score_spread":0.29950588768536507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6945697183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43910596,0.24923232,0.005655339,0.11607247,0.0071801795,0.0009670348,0.00053428044,0.0002615926,0.18099084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91913134,0.001953872,0.000091993534,0.00028390874,0.00076502643,0.00001650731,0.00003058771,0.000025624518,0.07770113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880933,0.00044903127,0.0007629683,0.0014265304,0.007079255,0.0021888874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952943,0.0024856734,0.00017372529,0.00050151296,0.0010540268,0.00049080764],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072372975,0.0004052986,0.00041984476,0.008773973,0.0019263804,0.007987642,0.0033731796,0.0003073917,0.0010675375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047585955,0.00030040226,0.00022398487,0.13363977,0.0014189302,0.0023572973,0.00069366716,0.0009851024,0.00022528226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021039468,0.00012927223,0.003386781,0.00008067741,0.00011389522,0.000095858275,0.003117642,0.0004572109,0.0023241686,0.54879266,0.20375644,0.23772436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032382004,0.00043972456,0.00619396,0.00008167213,0.000031852658,0.000068777736,0.011387154,0.007036176,0.0025871086,0.00751929,0.96386456,0.00046587095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7916452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91685843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002353183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036638916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6950491719","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6363344","title":"Bibliometria","year":2022,"lang":"ca","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Presentation (obstetrics); Architecture","score_opus":0.4596402214548644,"score_gpt":0.44820902761428033,"score_spread":0.011431193840584053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6950491719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006225017,0.0024418228,0.0021342763,0.0021442599,0.0015857047,0.0014667701,0.0041491743,0.0006985196,0.98475695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.287132,0.034390766,0.0014050857,0.0013585449,0.0024204527,4.9360176e-7,0.013933768,0.01820894,0.64114994],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97366387,0.0013642601,0.0018528021,0.0029147319,0.01833232,0.0018719977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816807,0.001530816,0.0011440724,0.003148145,0.010762522,0.0017337635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03308613,0.00076093816,0.0010089944,0.25182927,0.013319829,0.024245404,0.01613358,0.0005344565,0.68353546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038197633,0.0007518485,0.0006650763,0.23040447,0.001109346,0.0014494561,0.024477854,0.0026961856,0.13161531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012282799,0.0002263509,0.000005312916,0.000048770202,0.0001379194,0.00013909102,0.00022106171,0.000041348834,0.00028606618,0.08975931,0.4293492,0.47966275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097337685,0.0012336941,0.0003506229,0.000042044303,0.000049314374,0.0002883996,0.00031384215,0.0005430255,0.0000538293,0.0051837834,0.99015015,0.00081789045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000078350946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.6536207e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56080097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012846208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057577316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957921271","doi":"10.60692/334bv-cx045","title":"Understanding the structure, characteristics, and future of collective intelligence using local and global bibliometric analyses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Collective intelligence; Scopus; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Scientometrics","score_opus":0.6239676538400103,"score_gpt":0.47354080569349677,"score_spread":0.15042684814651353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957921271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893403,0.00010417858,0.30891776,0.000036463072,0.0003633905,0.00022777241,0.0006211252,0.00001127384,0.00037777514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999774,0.0000034428112,0.00013146218,0.000036022382,0.00003270185,0.0000032316334,0.0000035153453,0.0000027656529,0.000012902816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949546,0.00026311903,0.0007794798,0.00023106713,0.0035276772,0.0002440951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775237,0.000264703,0.0006018416,0.00030375912,0.0009473498,0.00012999507],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049394188,0.00012148911,0.0002799032,0.10038493,0.00072020706,0.0014616194,0.00061035657,0.000053798096,0.000083503284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071840914,0.00007206674,0.000051551866,0.38094217,0.0001890494,0.0006677129,0.0007016678,0.00015067105,0.0000043829714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101205565,0.000003831779,0.9544839,0.00007338993,0.00007044859,0.000003553343,0.015201495,0.0009921644,0.000005793058,0.0021661618,0.0001790641,0.026718985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035107258,0.00015015481,0.6478035,0.000011088537,0.000030401501,0.00014710681,0.21754707,0.13292323,0.00015953026,0.00045217888,0.0002344595,0.00019022686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002619854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.3360234e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3104337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005361908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013531906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957496},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6958598632","doi":"10.60692/shhbe-5st07","title":"Challenging the \"old boys club\" in academia: Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Editorial board; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Impact factor; Public health; Citation; Gender diversity; Environmental epidemiology; Location","score_opus":0.5157832682160188,"score_gpt":0.4533655330304372,"score_spread":0.062417735185581635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958598632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99620724,0.00029708934,0.00021353186,0.0011947148,0.0013585098,0.00035989325,0.000043480894,0.0000062890776,0.0003192605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959934,0.00003392617,0.000025345948,0.00010840845,0.00018384107,0.00003767878,0.0000029280254,0.0000027124213,0.0000058148894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100524,0.00084010116,0.0014449013,0.00031988657,0.0059224246,0.00046744038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984798,0.0003659253,0.00066034956,0.00021894943,0.00013474416,0.00014022358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056385227,0.00009624411,0.00026250217,0.037591867,0.0004152908,0.00276607,0.0007950685,0.00014759501,0.000030454523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002314152,0.00006535647,0.000036477082,0.03775502,0.00013413283,0.00446486,0.0007620599,0.00091263454,0.0000029568757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009812467,0.0000050075973,0.96590793,0.000016708915,0.0000024119945,8.2226336e-7,0.030679196,0.00040280796,0.0000015005118,0.000110894216,0.0002555108,0.002607382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000706041,0.00004417926,0.8318804,0.000014060046,5.4493825e-7,0.00001287756,0.15697606,0.009906083,0.0000035722067,0.000048425347,0.00034641425,0.00006134218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025243082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004659673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13402754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002659718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958677568","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.5331967.v1","title":"Charleston Hyde Park Debate 2017 Opening Statement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Statement (logic); Session (web analytics); George (robot); South carolina; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.879765729153358,"score_gpt":0.6524550071459614,"score_spread":0.22731072200739666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958677568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13575582,0.0034052634,0.00016081955,0.0062154173,0.0023281442,0.002127072,0.39909583,0.00020972856,0.4507019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821949,0.00007434006,0.00031711883,0.00017437573,0.00018453722,0.00010417261,0.0039131497,0.000018915416,0.013018483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217904,0.000095134805,0.00051514636,0.0007120609,0.0058310865,0.00066756416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99394596,0.001257191,0.00060031586,0.0019645658,0.0017538872,0.00047810192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005369314,0.00015408873,0.00025556673,0.010519395,0.0013215034,0.0109349415,0.005929666,0.00008829896,0.18327619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10663297,0.00010862494,0.00012728423,0.013278085,0.000030792227,0.0014043397,0.0024819812,0.00023165932,0.027645288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057014668,0.000025366979,0.004451118,0.0000064215737,0.000006434138,0.000066534565,0.00004417103,0.000009446475,0.00006999228,0.000017128583,0.87302446,0.12227324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003183866,0.00005908598,0.15809484,0.00012950625,0.0000016046018,0.000005603808,0.000054364216,0.0022320002,0.0013177156,0.0006354049,0.836955,0.00019645963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079225836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003322646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84643906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008159681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018012828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967294049","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10030167","title":"Scale-adjusted metrics of scientific collaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Function (biology); Preference; Index (typography); Comparability","score_opus":0.5188573241778306,"score_gpt":0.4436647591568995,"score_spread":0.07519256502093108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967294049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.640373,0.0002950544,0.017891554,0.0005811688,0.00096994074,0.0009495405,0.0006186069,0.00043905742,0.33788204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951847,0.00004781721,0.0015175513,0.000026819816,0.000043864708,3.385197e-8,0.0001985821,0.00030821134,0.0026724122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918843,0.0006599765,0.0007182528,0.00076573575,0.0054601054,0.0005116225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98477316,0.00030221217,0.00036879454,0.0010964184,0.013058272,0.00040113338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017368136,0.00013106581,0.00024724635,0.030045168,0.002228774,0.004668995,0.0040816437,0.00010056416,0.018962573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032008797,0.00010028991,0.00009473779,0.15774584,0.00058577204,0.00089221174,0.002239623,0.00023624882,0.006780472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001060215,0.00055879226,0.0007271662,0.00002652808,0.000030114054,0.000009396958,0.0026930661,0.000014082509,0.013176424,0.005653075,0.24774544,0.7292599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006193341,0.000478337,0.018781776,0.000011957168,0.000012437454,0.000027416952,0.0019695456,0.0018281635,0.018233748,0.0029289857,0.95488024,0.00022805874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030117897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012944405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7290318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014870112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002400352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967312700","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10032032","title":"Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literature; Bibliometrics; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Scientific evidence; Scientific progress","score_opus":0.34522479856473925,"score_gpt":0.4207023654068284,"score_spread":0.07547756684208917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967312700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82179415,0.00010489656,0.017611546,0.00043490547,0.000118582895,0.00039887533,0.00011728865,0.00023690322,0.15918285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962901,0.00010696329,0.00038081626,0.000048256003,0.000030005984,5.8651196e-8,0.00019146668,0.00011768205,0.0028346376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990012,0.00020036133,0.00084425765,0.000628957,0.0077478355,0.000566621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796089,0.00030555113,0.0005055599,0.0007449578,0.018336898,0.000498165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012738022,0.00014812846,0.00034204498,0.4866034,0.0032960498,0.008759255,0.004476941,0.000091440976,0.018491827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04118942,0.00012532406,0.00019541555,0.82345766,0.0007853985,0.0021973664,0.0026625914,0.00028049553,0.01096807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118387085,0.0004578987,0.0055751656,0.00005239637,0.00025041788,0.000011620257,0.005486644,0.00017242333,0.0028281312,0.008018069,0.3750755,0.6019533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038843477,0.00026971084,0.053604312,0.0000062448594,0.000026111236,0.00009038229,0.00090480933,0.005158521,0.0007573033,0.0005005106,0.9381201,0.00017353696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006090723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.0244396e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6017798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012027879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035512803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967628890","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1127701","title":"Mapping The Structure Nose Surgery Discipline In Science Citation Index (Sci) During The Period Of 1999-2012","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Citation; Citation index; Index (typography); Medical record; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.3268955456748074,"score_gpt":0.4315771853947674,"score_spread":0.10468163971996003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967628890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98901796,0.00013734373,0.0007789914,0.003068543,0.00024037599,0.00036185433,0.0000813039,0.00003897942,0.006274666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991736,0.000061114624,0.000038536866,0.000023046867,0.00008319728,4.0324654e-8,0.000018145078,0.00012934806,0.0004729629],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314606,0.0004379164,0.00054866966,0.0005649756,0.0047478913,0.0005545102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427277,0.0006173186,0.00048302027,0.0015862198,0.0028590157,0.00018164638],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02101568,0.000116012634,0.00019444042,0.012779995,0.008231869,0.008994821,0.0073165717,0.000052296164,0.0026856072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05023561,0.0000663491,0.000076136166,0.0422434,0.0015824588,0.0014409085,0.0052103666,0.00040166022,0.00037999652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025244322,0.0003723996,0.05379352,0.00011021757,0.000049135477,0.000047555775,0.016634502,0.0011455842,0.08982658,0.0042192466,0.041790605,0.79175824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028654558,0.000035984118,0.9174534,0.000023911087,0.0000016744428,0.000032834323,0.0024440752,0.0030149887,0.001113249,0.0013000929,0.07417064,0.00012261914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007002831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000820276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86365986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016152347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034689845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968891630","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6975588","title":"Geographic differences in the uptake of diamond open access and APCs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diamond; Latin Americans; Quality (philosophy); Conversation; Sustainability; Diamond model","score_opus":0.5743677420974477,"score_gpt":0.4965523625336467,"score_spread":0.07781537956380097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968891630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92688674,0.00033727934,0.00028063208,0.0018177623,0.0000961379,0.0006744982,0.0002562265,0.00003745096,0.0696133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907637,0.0002006107,0.00004612342,0.00012470249,0.000016189615,2.0713632e-7,0.000056069395,0.00011469798,0.00036505546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937687,0.0011149575,0.0004633049,0.0005156297,0.003790359,0.00034702965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997451,0.00058900344,0.00019538277,0.00066166586,0.0009634631,0.00013946029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020346934,0.00008781154,0.00019307187,0.012351065,0.0023744155,0.010334171,0.0129595185,0.000026692156,0.011508355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009292225,0.000060406604,0.00004361671,0.06424216,0.000280083,0.0008107097,0.017732807,0.00035105643,0.00016846591],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012519392,0.0006636483,0.018745458,0.00002202034,0.000028805793,0.000031422383,0.0031120672,0.000057069647,0.00062793476,0.017448772,0.14312935,0.81600827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039553974,0.00029544515,0.32516012,0.0000035180635,0.0000028113718,0.000030128009,0.0022478732,0.0006835953,0.000025312465,0.005727641,0.6653351,0.00009291473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014495906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022469537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81591535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044798795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010408795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969138330","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7331521","title":"Impact of In-text Citations on Journal Rankings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Measure (data warehouse); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking","score_opus":0.3991001087962572,"score_gpt":0.48859647094177083,"score_spread":0.08949636214551365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969138330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91408044,0.00010587919,0.0013354282,0.0008296617,0.0001976325,0.00029784263,0.00027123743,0.000062309635,0.08281955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987678,0.00004918186,0.000084645486,0.00004749267,0.00003981252,3.424378e-8,0.00006397587,0.00022586859,0.0007212037],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243265,0.001036536,0.00056368316,0.0003926287,0.005143199,0.00043129927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560803,0.00059956877,0.00028838342,0.0005034561,0.0027391105,0.00026145994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016358202,0.00009402725,0.00018900335,0.030546121,0.0026323698,0.0024087657,0.0033590323,0.000030535943,0.05839016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022374019,0.00007758514,0.00015559331,0.07165052,0.00013722223,0.0003707911,0.0021562984,0.000607752,0.0019973966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027277434,0.00089319586,0.0022273422,0.0000063305197,0.000046466324,0.0000554884,0.0021413942,0.00640223,0.0038920771,0.005157223,0.4842259,0.49467957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014505232,0.0023561895,0.16793291,0.0000104071805,0.000004284663,0.0002502512,0.0014292283,0.00270989,0.0001071655,0.006011326,0.81753314,0.00020471998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002900345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7625486e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49447486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049464975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026364925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969180740","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7331520","title":"Impact of In-text Citations on Journal Rankings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Measure (data warehouse); Bibliometrics; Journal ranking","score_opus":0.3991001087962572,"score_gpt":0.48859647094177083,"score_spread":0.08949636214551365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969180740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91408044,0.00010587919,0.0013354282,0.0008296617,0.0001976325,0.00029784263,0.00027123743,0.000062309635,0.08281955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987678,0.00004918186,0.000084645486,0.00004749267,0.00003981252,3.424378e-8,0.00006397587,0.00022586859,0.0007212037],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243265,0.001036536,0.00056368316,0.0003926287,0.005143199,0.00043129927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560803,0.00059956877,0.00028838342,0.0005034561,0.0027391105,0.00026145994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016358202,0.00009402725,0.00018900335,0.030546121,0.0026323698,0.0024087657,0.0033590323,0.000030535943,0.05839016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022374019,0.00007758514,0.00015559331,0.07165052,0.00013722223,0.0003707911,0.0021562984,0.000607752,0.0019973966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027277434,0.00089319586,0.0022273422,0.0000063305197,0.000046466324,0.0000554884,0.0021413942,0.00640223,0.0038920771,0.005157223,0.4842259,0.49467957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014505232,0.0023561895,0.16793291,0.0000104071805,0.000004284663,0.0002502512,0.0014292283,0.00270989,0.0001071655,0.006011326,0.81753314,0.00020471998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002900345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7625486e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49447486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049464975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026364925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969364436","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6128263","title":"Statistics on the papers published in the Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences from 2007 to 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Bibliometrics; Duration (music); Publishing; Impact factor","score_opus":0.27967595202343104,"score_gpt":0.40158938821890844,"score_spread":0.1219134361954774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969364436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5380388,0.00039044308,0.0014493879,0.042643595,0.00072467525,0.001306964,0.0020723215,0.000028845727,0.41334498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985294,0.000016838829,0.00018060354,0.0008602744,0.000063609594,7.724291e-8,0.00003727804,0.00007287577,0.00023907489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370605,0.00089146587,0.00034262092,0.00033758624,0.0043550665,0.00036718822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967096,0.001282066,0.00015364285,0.00041402658,0.0011354588,0.00030522837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026590949,0.00007230322,0.00011727796,0.009848698,0.004808198,0.009036888,0.0046413974,0.000024073299,0.050047662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027075622,0.000041505802,0.000024981317,0.042866293,0.0003203415,0.00017596313,0.0011815168,0.0004996777,0.0005403403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070691,0.000058375732,0.0003242077,0.0000011430284,0.000008590177,0.000022651288,0.0030663053,0.0004886187,0.00026701464,0.024443047,0.8486853,0.122604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018422506,0.00030706142,0.018160684,0.0000024721678,0.0000020111095,0.000019508387,0.006866641,0.00025189904,0.000026924434,0.003803641,0.97030807,0.00006683825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007276244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024008416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46049058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017106238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007315139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976620588","doi":"10.6068/dp14ba834636723","title":"Trend 1982 - 2006. Statistics Canada. CANSIM: Government - Government Business Enterprises | Country: Canada | Table: Federal government business enterprise finance, balance sheet, as at the end of the fiscal year ending closest to December 31 | Variable: Total liabilities, Other financial enterprises | Units: $CAD x 1,000, 1982-2006. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 075-001-105.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic statistics; Government (linguistics); Business statistics; Census; Official statistics; Goods and services; Politics; Fiscal year; Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.05425574895205159,"score_gpt":0.3216861832351012,"score_spread":0.2674304342830496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976620588","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046882826,0.001362161,0.00006358589,0.000045051256,0.0032197114,0.0011902186,0.9739748,0.0000221234,0.020075444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00060071057,0.0007152261,0.000112177215,0.0007704684,0.00038113949,0.00005836847,0.94182605,0.00016692888,0.055368934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754467,0.00066160253,0.0018752298,0.0021511037,0.01830566,0.001559717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875316,0.0045178873,0.0015939676,0.0051238267,0.0004637152,0.0007689988],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036326642,0.0010324172,0.0013932352,0.0004903003,0.00052054983,0.0015729449,0.008188525,0.00041811806,0.008198233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005489504,0.00068539695,0.0000022432498,0.010381206,0.00064498355,0.00045528714,0.006192599,0.0008439121,0.00006429201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040180847,0.00028034768,0.0018042552,0.00016450457,0.00014466961,0.00017915927,0.0000064814612,0.00023889398,0.0000076162473,0.00020790438,0.9957428,0.00082155154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008777019,0.00011016333,0.00063835154,0.00010026197,0.00013419743,0.00007816321,0.00030447304,0.00097352505,0.0000010002168,9.277683e-7,0.99598384,0.0007973932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03529349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031570313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0139981285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976629300","doi":"10.60692/bz342-dd882","title":"Candidate Markers Associated with the Probability of Future Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis Patients","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; McGill University Health Centre; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cystic fibrosis; C-reactive protein; Prospective cohort study; Cohort; Respiratory disease; Cohort study; Risk factor; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Biomarker; Disease","score_opus":0.1299720237287391,"score_gpt":0.3405012280144234,"score_spread":0.2105292042856843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976629300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926646,0.0000030246047,0.0029945665,0.00012824174,0.00016445175,0.00056739675,0.00018911976,0.000021738722,0.003266876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996604,1.2813867e-7,0.000079558995,0.000030977702,0.00001770101,0.00006445479,0.000024809113,0.0000041258113,0.00011788847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943977,0.000508254,0.0008964106,0.00022419139,0.0036690866,0.0003043604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592155,0.00048291942,0.00063695683,0.0006123492,0.0022307665,0.00011546283],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011298658,0.00012644095,0.00026041313,0.008655405,0.00018366367,0.0006401076,0.0008389518,0.0000976815,0.000049356076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003924946,0.00006344567,0.00005671524,0.040604677,0.00009240042,0.0008852592,0.00016270431,0.00013675376,0.000107558575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058083817,0.000008783103,0.99194264,0.00003092424,0.000008971505,1.744725e-7,0.0042929514,0.00035915134,2.933467e-7,0.000058942867,0.00039633026,0.002842744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005040209,0.00010360968,0.9813345,0.000037739464,0.0000055259657,7.8894243e-7,0.0040606176,0.013306831,0.000016868173,0.000012122311,0.0005305243,0.00008683783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031865842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008531088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03194927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020195424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007754544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976895578","doi":"10.60692/wv1da-v7405","title":"Challenging the \"old boys club\" in academia: Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of journals publishing in environmental sciences and public health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Editorial board; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Impact factor; Public health; Citation; Gender diversity; Environmental epidemiology; Location","score_opus":0.5157832682160188,"score_gpt":0.4533655330304372,"score_spread":0.062417735185581635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976895578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99620724,0.00029708934,0.00021353186,0.0011947148,0.0013585098,0.00035989325,0.000043480894,0.0000062890776,0.0003192605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959934,0.00003392617,0.000025345948,0.00010840845,0.00018384107,0.00003767878,0.0000029280254,0.0000027124213,0.0000058148894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100524,0.00084010116,0.0014449013,0.00031988657,0.0059224246,0.00046744038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984798,0.0003659253,0.00066034956,0.00021894943,0.00013474416,0.00014022358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056385227,0.00009624411,0.00026250217,0.037591867,0.0004152908,0.00276607,0.0007950685,0.00014759501,0.000030454523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002314152,0.00006535647,0.000036477082,0.03775502,0.00013413283,0.00446486,0.0007620599,0.00091263454,0.0000029568757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009812467,0.0000050075973,0.96590793,0.000016708915,0.0000024119945,8.2226336e-7,0.030679196,0.00040280796,0.0000015005118,0.000110894216,0.0002555108,0.002607382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000706041,0.00004417926,0.8318804,0.000014060046,5.4493825e-7,0.00001287756,0.15697606,0.009906083,0.0000035722067,0.000048425347,0.00034641425,0.00006134218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025243082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004659673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13402754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002659718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977353442","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.25264615.v1","title":"Research Output of Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (CJILS): A Bibliometric Analysis from 1993-2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Information science; Information system; National library","score_opus":0.5917176489081988,"score_gpt":0.541196785067119,"score_spread":0.05052086384107979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977353442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6834046,0.03746009,0.00015464007,0.0014116493,0.0007065255,0.0004574746,0.25057843,0.000023880639,0.025802674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977025,0.00026424747,0.00045836478,0.00002274972,0.00008176222,0.000004850224,0.0011778242,0.0000055999626,0.00028213288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881393,0.00017983891,0.00089741655,0.00036502312,0.009863662,0.00055478234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828112,0.007467972,0.000305874,0.0006008837,0.0076617794,0.0011522498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013790701,0.00009768192,0.00031598608,0.93580306,0.00029090667,0.010908549,0.0029066456,0.00010626594,0.07663972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1006407,0.0000680476,0.00017253384,0.97319645,0.00019359583,0.0059669223,0.00077358837,0.00045722054,0.0007658435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007798048,0.000018361145,0.036808267,0.00004156295,0.000089133035,0.000049054408,0.00054533355,0.000060953833,0.00006758655,0.00013405514,0.5265614,0.43561652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013120494,0.00013698277,0.62932056,0.0002359129,0.000021002053,0.000007097106,0.0006460043,0.011874629,0.0011540574,0.0014767313,0.35487446,0.00012133652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066128266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068669923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5925123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009692041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047498657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966604},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6980087666","doi":"","title":"Assessing COVID-19 Research Outputs of Iran’s Top Universities in Social Media: An Altmetric Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Shahid; Altmetrics; Social media; Descriptive statistics; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Population; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.9412555029710544,"score_gpt":0.7885958834143622,"score_spread":0.15265961955669227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980087666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837447,0.008650023,0.0004461813,0.0005212798,0.00064333365,0.00046771386,0.00006303813,0.000012854822,0.0054508965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967543,0.002206803,0.00020219242,0.000099017234,0.00017529548,0.000010368985,0.00000704559,0.000024601884,0.00052040746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.972494,0.0054666954,0.0019514684,0.0012332037,0.017843561,0.001011051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96732914,0.021564087,0.0010576468,0.001046878,0.0079586245,0.0010436096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.081728175,0.00026987478,0.0012732276,0.14315148,0.0009848416,0.013469144,0.01084537,0.00021298368,0.010122062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07701987,0.00022817435,0.00025293257,0.30647784,0.00056178536,0.00786698,0.0058543463,0.0011461402,0.000020811523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013120125,0.001744549,0.9228656,0.000035215966,0.00006944265,0.00056542706,0.0035120083,0.00010310855,0.005817897,0.00026907361,0.01694235,0.04794412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011964302,0.000043357824,0.9292103,0.000041108997,0.0000171128,0.0000075002363,0.052113444,0.00014393401,0.0028545111,0.01117714,0.0029353767,0.00025974907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003071239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008766258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16332638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008918464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037074485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981652213","doi":"","title":"Étude comparative des modes d'acculturation chez des étudiants étrangers provenant d'une société individualiste et d'une société collectiviste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling error; Ethnic discrimination; Mode (computer interface)","score_opus":0.20536556049313584,"score_gpt":0.39814361011624533,"score_spread":0.1927780496231095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981652213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32289156,0.013076532,0.013348714,0.011761916,0.0018100786,0.004434553,0.0027026923,0.0005382203,0.6294357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6717275,0.022601247,0.0026865536,0.00029305884,0.00030652477,0.000015767506,0.0003056767,0.00026282994,0.30180088],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851039,0.0016582584,0.0011058869,0.0029178327,0.0071011963,0.002112945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847604,0.0030549315,0.0017224066,0.0011426582,0.003708576,0.0018953752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003573498,0.0015294739,0.0023397428,0.019985015,0.0033886235,0.0025089947,0.0051201154,0.0011802294,0.0022077325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017389331,0.0014422586,0.0012532838,0.11019482,0.002789809,0.0037624843,0.0025143581,0.0017733473,0.0005543517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031580676,0.0034784777,0.062636435,0.001036331,0.005423469,0.0034006762,0.2663776,0.0029846658,0.07383786,0.03728067,0.08928507,0.45110068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01880012,0.0045237024,0.22834884,0.0016533709,0.0024404798,0.00024378186,0.2147066,0.017069057,0.030416312,0.009694311,0.46544436,0.0066590696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017041093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060097862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4444416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045242677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028007636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982624877","doi":"","title":"The International Development of Open Access Publishing: A Comparative Empirical Analysis Over Seven World&#13;\\nRegions and Nine Academic Disciplines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scopus; Discipline; International development; Publication; Development studies; Open access publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Citation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5472215050194077,"score_gpt":0.5591466518126567,"score_spread":0.011925146793248964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982624877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732863,0.002727538,0.00004559454,0.11109596,0.00048507846,0.0005503911,0.00009738209,0.000018060793,0.011693663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97760016,0.0003057072,0.0019446607,0.00084624125,0.00013516296,0.000014575305,0.000003885308,0.000015669337,0.019133942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98725456,0.001217183,0.0025570139,0.0010728693,0.007347528,0.00055086723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98947483,0.006201403,0.0029899094,0.0007045792,0.00029341824,0.00033584167],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008863667,0.00030555262,0.0009592041,0.008153335,0.0014040547,0.004312229,0.03340875,0.0003204046,0.0001977058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032969506,0.00015152912,0.00055297994,0.10121204,0.003851729,0.016410453,0.030763596,0.0013594246,0.0000014202012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012679318,0.00015921623,0.91918844,0.00002414075,0.0004988503,6.6956295e-7,0.0012240404,0.0005968426,0.0055148033,0.0067905234,0.063380964,0.002494699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003504988,0.00002088272,0.83755934,0.00012551027,0.00008854109,0.0000099920135,0.0007177016,0.0042949906,0.11355221,0.015944233,0.0271535,0.00018261053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023441404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006277758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11024972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036633493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001379283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991094829","doi":"","title":"The evaluation of the biorefinery research: A scientometric approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DSpace (Sirnak University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biorefinery; Incentive; Scopus; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.9046261129120148,"score_gpt":0.6202098476861282,"score_spread":0.2844162652258866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991094829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84691256,0.0017968318,0.0006606195,0.0016530425,0.0011382847,0.00062671385,0.000015367788,0.000014675663,0.14718187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98114735,0.00015499795,0.00019906508,0.000013083653,0.00009327569,0.000001532092,7.360107e-7,0.000006498176,0.018383484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730926,0.002557035,0.00030615664,0.00046392935,0.022608561,0.00097168196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824051,0.00670364,0.00031588445,0.0015717195,0.008595056,0.000408569],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11402765,0.00011182932,0.00017634868,0.073617436,0.0015029864,0.00078531937,0.004979956,0.000106654246,0.0000967215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05958241,0.000056435976,0.0002013588,0.5006656,0.0010929324,0.0007951879,0.0020149422,0.00044887277,0.00011579011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093517076,0.0009051747,0.52124715,0.000012083893,0.00008300032,0.0000015246459,0.0018370395,0.00042651762,0.0025092624,0.10229474,0.111030184,0.25955978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007727093,0.000074668715,0.43731797,0.00000811304,0.000034484005,0.000003923009,0.0117533,0.008480994,0.001070349,0.0018705933,0.5384395,0.00017338226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013888026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030036555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42740935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004760293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057996454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997969},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6991528178","doi":"","title":"Health and medical informatics research: Identifying international collaboration patterns at the country and institution level","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Scopus; Context (archaeology); Health informatics; Citation; Bibliometrics; Institution; Informatics; Centrality; Citation impact","score_opus":0.40946899275156406,"score_gpt":0.554792245777516,"score_spread":0.1453232530259519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991528178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96413517,0.00211887,0.01197508,0.014494825,0.0007257168,0.00021437705,0.000182321,0.000027555883,0.0061260834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303615,0.0050009806,0.0002118839,0.0003410065,0.00009622879,0.0000032785913,0.000028936545,0.000005136616,0.0012763906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928102,0.0004668756,0.00029700232,0.00026728466,0.005839246,0.0003194118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437624,0.0042338893,0.00008410905,0.00021681261,0.0006974621,0.00039148665],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023136035,0.00007596792,0.00012282997,0.011719242,0.0006775949,0.0042373654,0.0007245157,0.00012747088,0.00024726827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008160849,0.00005268569,0.00002564141,0.028362129,0.00052877795,0.0011133836,0.0009319391,0.00041788348,0.00006158562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006728917,0.000058334885,0.10891138,0.00010923762,0.000065661574,0.00015610748,0.018397763,0.00003764495,0.00009908024,0.09796262,0.15081966,0.6233152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093414076,0.00014885177,0.22187734,0.00018036022,0.000007600866,0.00017912702,0.030409172,0.12725413,0.00004553213,0.00876192,0.60998,0.00022183603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047501823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010215881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62309337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004540688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010239453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991634660","doi":"","title":"Health Hacks #217: Research behind magic mushrooms to treat depression","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Depression (economics); Health care; Magic bullet; Great Depression","score_opus":0.20965280692400548,"score_gpt":0.4524556190828035,"score_spread":0.24280281215879804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991634660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015533419,0.0010384425,0.00000424914,0.0018255919,0.00069315865,0.0010917826,0.00037119183,0.00023503714,0.9945852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011311744,0.0011757859,0.00080081756,0.00030965783,0.00025049815,0.000029234383,0.000049861042,0.00023574424,0.9960172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98348385,0.0006649644,0.0016360781,0.0008769701,0.012084493,0.0012536707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99065727,0.0036148352,0.0008179287,0.0015241446,0.00238488,0.0010009126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017597212,0.00040437578,0.0008724056,0.023105873,0.00030773212,0.0012758662,0.0029876651,0.00057926506,0.3135504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016934553,0.00031197647,0.00027470326,0.0037595918,0.00028340748,0.0000011618956,0.0013587854,0.0008492309,0.1507869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005634304,0.00006506561,0.000066839384,0.00010853621,0.000013973144,0.000025678442,0.00018510898,0.00016155514,3.1372448e-7,0.000009577682,0.9057504,0.09355661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044274854,0.00036918218,0.00023475547,0.00022936577,0.000005643463,0.000021834156,0.00027660892,0.00008147221,0.0000110842675,0.00007780441,0.997947,0.00030252748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025521077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00640911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16276349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030387615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002465937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996401681","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Communication at the University of Mauritius: Case Study Report","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Mauritius Research Council; International Development Research Centre; Tertiary Education Commission","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Information and Communications Technology; Technical communication; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Communication studies","score_opus":0.313594323291349,"score_gpt":0.43642719726890483,"score_spread":0.12283287397755582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996401681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92826784,0.00014508657,0.0017258018,0.0015239816,0.000078992765,0.00072631706,0.00009748489,0.000016252627,0.067418225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95144093,0.00028027242,0.0016207086,0.000019740588,0.000007133623,2.3236577e-8,0.00001562239,0.0000075643957,0.046607986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936817,0.0010736084,0.00040787578,0.000781506,0.0036604123,0.00039489794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896577,0.0019717289,0.0011727429,0.0025918386,0.004237122,0.00036885223],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012049291,0.00020306023,0.0007174446,0.0060477965,0.0017195527,0.0003517489,0.008276788,0.00019377517,0.007608774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018355369,0.0002061187,0.00032499825,0.021259788,0.0013326677,0.0031206994,0.0070783724,0.00042693602,0.00011578767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032560546,0.0049649775,0.41475078,0.000114697774,0.0012190762,0.011672538,0.056593094,0.00073282066,0.0027454458,0.00416768,0.2669628,0.23282003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065210033,0.0012706113,0.14954211,0.000071704875,0.00038641985,0.0005622399,0.5038255,0.0031777443,0.00017370556,0.0007926016,0.33300894,0.000667469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05459189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022436969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44723237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002717482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000440694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998924911","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Open Access Digital Humanities Publications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Bibliometrics; Digital scholarship; Digital library; Web of science; Scientometrics; Digital preservation; Digital collections","score_opus":0.7161193792084019,"score_gpt":0.57432565306417,"score_spread":0.1417937261442318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998924911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893191,0.00051380065,0.008951442,0.0015960056,0.00012708842,0.00020250007,0.0006489875,0.000019597053,0.09862143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96965903,0.00025212986,0.0011119996,0.000041642736,0.000013149221,4.377772e-7,0.0000715779,0.0000050112562,0.028845014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377877,0.00013695867,0.00045450972,0.0006285753,0.004701633,0.0002995833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98640347,0.003410446,0.00057480193,0.0011134469,0.008249398,0.00024843388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039390964,0.00010256635,0.00057934085,0.7192675,0.00032427217,0.006129736,0.008968588,0.000095099786,0.0060806284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011921049,0.00010389175,0.00038816346,0.9495018,0.00032294873,0.0057970253,0.0072585857,0.00013535559,0.000071951516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023800187,0.0006587202,0.80540276,0.000011527596,0.0006238617,0.00002109567,0.00027807034,0.00021580416,0.00020480245,0.008915267,0.02900735,0.15463695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032986648,0.000047454327,0.92920417,0.0000042493393,0.000112394315,0.0000010800001,0.0026837804,0.0024578024,0.00014440728,0.0025805288,0.062315214,0.000119045275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007643503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065971847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23023432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000728065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061875326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99640197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998945594","doi":"","title":"Canadian Solar Publishes 2021 Corporate Sustainability Report","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Corporate sustainability","score_opus":0.4524526052326481,"score_gpt":0.5213108519337256,"score_spread":0.06885824670107754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998945594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012363595,0.0008116441,0.00029729813,0.0044926503,0.0017926665,0.00067055493,0.0002844458,0.00006811525,0.991459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025134836,0.0000868679,0.00035703633,0.00025708802,0.00024064902,0.000048543334,0.00016908073,0.00017068892,0.9961566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812076,0.0005044804,0.00099795,0.0019170854,0.014099507,0.0012733863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819112,0.0021611901,0.0015324756,0.004818,0.0069246734,0.0026524803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042280696,0.0003241267,0.0006552882,0.1831954,0.0004151394,0.0070211845,0.0051970105,0.00041284328,0.6029823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12165839,0.00023510907,0.0002928668,0.27347466,0.00021538325,0.00041792844,0.0017859188,0.0007979953,0.0013704754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015375881,0.000036686502,0.09051596,0.0000054588186,0.000018748535,0.0012407387,0.0000074103123,0.0000018302919,1.5030992e-7,0.00065080787,0.8797207,0.027799979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092551556,0.0000404097,0.004574554,0.0000015824205,0.0000046510368,0.000043629716,0.000597747,0.000077653174,0.000001320998,0.012991606,0.98126966,0.00030464586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55372095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5337963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6016118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022393453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100294575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999185672","doi":"","title":"Canadian Solar Publishes Its 2020 Sustainability Report","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Sustainable development","score_opus":0.41558015040362,"score_gpt":0.5565792704804543,"score_spread":0.1409991200768343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999185672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008487237,0.0043074056,0.00035505352,0.009515822,0.0017024224,0.0004973428,0.000106359126,0.00006851167,0.9833622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036965627,0.00027847374,0.0004452746,0.00031929382,0.0003910008,0.000019526764,0.00009033797,0.00013683246,0.9946227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834622,0.000334835,0.0009575203,0.0019633034,0.01200373,0.0012783684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978225,0.0020208554,0.0005521339,0.0034844978,0.012913942,0.00280356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026169304,0.00031890522,0.00069527887,0.109950505,0.00020824693,0.009205732,0.0040791845,0.0006920987,0.22424503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2363022,0.00022455129,0.0003248363,0.26008525,0.0001281206,0.0003517504,0.0011321839,0.00060116604,0.00093641685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.770994e-7,0.000033419168,0.020642087,0.000017676968,0.000022333748,0.0017909097,0.000007026492,4.7045796e-7,9.5150517e-7,0.0003629701,0.95768183,0.019439613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007738055,0.00001862781,0.0056213345,0.000009130605,0.000004094546,0.00006933379,0.000302983,0.00008979148,0.000015226673,0.0020166861,0.9914865,0.00028890048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37976333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5385546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22330861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011087857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010637778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999428235","doi":"","title":"A century of peer-reviewed Australian Zoological Research: Prominent authors, themes and usage of papers from Australian Zoologist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic Entomology; Headline; Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Statistician; Ceylon","score_opus":0.6906917136886692,"score_gpt":0.5524235651333328,"score_spread":0.13826814855533642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999428235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95407814,0.0018084522,0.000027860311,0.004745217,0.00044362343,0.0008194468,0.00020346283,0.000034453144,0.03783937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88523954,0.0015555689,0.0012597888,0.000009492503,0.00013585409,0.0000062449612,0.000029054248,0.000019214187,0.11174526],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97193277,0.006644267,0.0012632657,0.0019544975,0.016498052,0.0017071344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97048664,0.010011372,0.00046617907,0.002104633,0.015583455,0.0013477018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02965695,0.0003433868,0.0010202538,0.025146395,0.0009835258,0.0011637058,0.0041132052,0.000521006,0.0013935659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04191447,0.00027281314,0.00041219467,0.08796452,0.003786955,0.00065155275,0.0036169903,0.001913042,0.000054374334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012102328,0.002375947,0.28138012,0.00044825146,0.0005471391,0.00776753,0.0025736806,0.00002742344,0.53657526,0.023887234,0.09017414,0.053033035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00167838,0.0012923187,0.20594661,0.00031797655,0.00004915107,0.000067233836,0.020138633,0.0001546942,0.089046605,0.0030982487,0.6776611,0.0005490457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002452519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015622666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.587487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047361452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013184706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999497510","doi":"","title":"Contribution of Annals of Library and Information Studies in SCOPUS database (2011-2021): An analysis Bibliomatrice study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annals; Scopus; Bibliometrics; Information center; Medical journal; Rank (graph theory)","score_opus":0.42896879734758064,"score_gpt":0.5090526222409143,"score_spread":0.08008382489333365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999497510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971609,0.0008865618,0.00051299337,0.0004234958,0.00006915701,0.0003353512,0.0004375302,0.000006132981,0.00016788673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998504,0.00090027717,0.00042405704,0.000021151951,0.0000056678123,8.291511e-7,0.000052353673,0.0000020143605,0.00008965049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949659,0.00060246384,0.0005489769,0.00031798866,0.0033633488,0.00020130516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995544,0.0016780479,0.0006995965,0.0005042893,0.0014326451,0.00014137714],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008813584,0.00008394711,0.0005165493,0.15267648,0.00021335582,0.00009358841,0.0011178617,0.000039236656,0.0006009952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002179219,0.000083796214,0.00010815311,0.27296153,0.00020318737,0.005604147,0.0018482881,0.00013250575,0.000004131896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003394516,0.0008850529,0.97709805,0.00002696449,0.00022218417,0.000024714336,0.0030577055,0.0011699222,0.00018308834,0.00073331123,0.0013798255,0.014879733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010824202,0.00084021094,0.9223997,0.0000055775536,0.000069577276,0.0000010574698,0.06165697,0.012291137,0.0001804262,0.0004182915,0.0009581853,0.0000964605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057418726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000965769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12028503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026821674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015179349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8569272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008656605","doi":"","title":"1896 Chap. 0446. An Act Making Further Provision For The Protection Of The Public Health In The Valleys Of The Concord And Sudbury Rivers.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Legislation","score_opus":0.13176895031017297,"score_gpt":0.37272086910253516,"score_spread":0.2409519187923622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008656605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35279113,0.0999338,0.006548105,0.13852136,0.008921616,0.06446365,0.003368707,0.00086623145,0.3245854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86580724,0.005867007,0.0005111044,0.00073983514,0.00023842807,0.00023025714,0.000030778123,0.0004559724,0.1261194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893719,0.0030091773,0.0016459203,0.0010902836,0.003685752,0.0011969974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919095,0.0020708959,0.0031697527,0.00245883,0.00021452222,0.0001764941],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075291996,0.000504376,0.0008876118,0.0073488327,0.0004695868,0.0010047883,0.0065939226,0.00028658853,0.00029622437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064851576,0.00022282766,0.00046589618,0.024519172,0.0010926477,0.0022679002,0.0012982476,0.001148645,0.0000024802837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016778841,0.001548329,0.09289095,0.0011623891,0.00085555064,0.000016769522,0.012791494,0.000105570616,0.0014885329,0.0075806566,0.49367395,0.38620794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019277976,0.0025658512,0.061912797,0.0004614713,0.000058697005,0.00004809413,0.001458895,0.0021322104,0.004734213,0.031832088,0.8921774,0.00069050427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046822598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008002424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000739619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002335745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009250478","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Gender and Funding on Research Performance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council Canada; National Research Council Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Gender gap; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Grant funding; Citation analysis; Descriptive statistics; Hard and soft science; Impact factor","score_opus":0.33691035291482624,"score_gpt":0.5031213144449854,"score_spread":0.16621096153015918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009250478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7372932,0.0019435072,0.0000014622449,0.00014570191,0.0014632364,0.0006177269,0.000009782499,0.000023457653,0.25850195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84256315,0.0020157658,0.0000019800748,9.3333074e-7,0.0002354228,0.0000071084933,0.0000081643575,0.000036222573,0.15513125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750841,0.003798501,0.0006510663,0.0015644804,0.017228656,0.0016731854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964792,0.029819647,0.00024879616,0.0015331203,0.002957801,0.0006486103],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061835106,0.0003326567,0.00060184766,0.082574934,0.003160123,0.0036838949,0.0045094974,0.00047234417,0.000059894443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013312311,0.00021273039,0.00030370534,0.111152254,0.0013262825,0.00044879163,0.0013806102,0.0038665542,0.00030379088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012285739,0.000328903,0.5856323,0.0026548721,0.0012010405,0.0031189858,0.0032529652,0.00006875836,0.018410387,0.053247955,0.1035527,0.21624535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001427439,0.009790939,0.5974773,0.00062179076,0.000086144115,0.000044222215,0.014136219,0.002799817,0.11783903,0.0063291444,0.24857916,0.00086878653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018004408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008904909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21537657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091980956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012538966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010518436","doi":"","title":"The Influences and Interactions between Various Scientific Research and Technological Domains in Case of Canadian Nanotechnology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Intellectualization; Feature (linguistics); Identification (biology); Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.33989707965871946,"score_gpt":0.4960087271973406,"score_spread":0.15611164753862117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010518436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724836,0.0012561543,0.0000021496624,0.0015501234,0.00042990013,0.000656571,0.000049569928,0.000021429465,0.023550507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781525,0.000676417,0.000022332504,8.024088e-7,0.000043992488,0.000007533805,0.000011042168,0.000014655412,0.021070724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910296,0.0018716981,0.0007056917,0.0014257919,0.00538346,0.0015104158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809428,0.011159459,0.0002689284,0.0012485451,0.0054421364,0.0009381203],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038926687,0.000230868,0.0005393474,0.20731084,0.0036120296,0.0029634535,0.0033680645,0.0007356104,0.000017127511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023068793,0.00017343141,0.000081796556,0.19831617,0.006632297,0.0005435684,0.0014144161,0.0034403955,0.00001980764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004354336,0.00022289784,0.8312234,0.00007627745,0.00016142637,0.015878784,0.001697991,0.000004150455,0.004353736,0.038583335,0.005690454,0.10167211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011574067,0.001691616,0.49292532,0.00016734052,0.00003130771,0.00085974875,0.076344326,0.0002550935,0.006124995,0.1314246,0.28834796,0.00067028246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43574697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47359896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011965838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042518103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015110812","doi":"","title":"Scientific research impact and data mining applications in hydrogeology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Office of Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Citation; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Key (lock); Stability (learning theory); Information system","score_opus":0.27253057997317776,"score_gpt":0.46919192323883907,"score_spread":0.19666134326566131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015110812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6892833,0.0033723053,0.0042454926,0.004530241,0.00059839844,0.001292158,0.00041402847,0.000090742236,0.29617333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956888,0.0011042514,0.0018330797,0.00030819196,0.0001427383,0.00002402793,0.0006217254,0.000008043271,0.0002691353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518836,0.00027228592,0.00086833007,0.00063450803,0.0021952318,0.0008412683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629754,0.0016511768,0.00019159043,0.0010979918,0.0003253382,0.00043637567],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011763309,0.0001528665,0.0002522251,0.01883259,0.0006970309,0.0050302953,0.00198745,0.00015483079,0.00023292644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013783032,0.00011092936,0.000040905554,0.06203802,0.0005084845,0.019811943,0.0027601663,0.00045186677,0.00008825976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011373912,0.00021991388,0.28026077,0.00003754485,0.00002733319,0.000007952397,0.0011337956,0.0024099278,0.00001795116,0.46994054,0.03428108,0.21154945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013001882,0.00013832116,0.18119809,0.00005101742,0.0000026412433,0.000029296038,0.00017906545,0.027806861,0.00003388155,0.03182989,0.7571835,0.00024724394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.813175e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006606765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003032988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002682941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99600255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015177041","doi":"","title":"Science Research Output pattern of University of Delhi (2015-2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"New delhi; Web of science; Citation; Citation impact; Scientometrics; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.5738139729034387,"score_gpt":0.5322962281283925,"score_spread":0.04151774477504622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015177041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97712696,0.00043766087,0.007834101,0.001362712,0.00021648439,0.00017572338,0.00014638243,0.000010450874,0.012689514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812408,0.00031736636,0.0028403224,0.000009160535,0.000016952548,1.760771e-8,0.0000037389723,0.000004974712,0.015566681],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98781455,0.00054291706,0.0003358036,0.00081162335,0.009912129,0.00058298046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98106265,0.002914693,0.0004012383,0.0012014701,0.013969679,0.00045029528],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02104237,0.00010550213,0.0004591332,0.038409688,0.0005457719,0.0001393557,0.0045390963,0.0001451113,0.0013350674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069125756,0.00011468627,0.0002249567,0.17043531,0.0025348612,0.00081874715,0.0033931823,0.00034171803,0.00017525435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041887726,0.0020476258,0.2693944,0.00015268997,0.00012551865,0.00048497456,0.0068267817,0.00033482126,0.07514976,0.005930021,0.075729676,0.56340486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025475516,0.0009212224,0.8385942,0.00011638224,0.000033980552,0.000020312678,0.056217737,0.009014726,0.013497903,0.004379079,0.07422462,0.000432271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023669184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044217304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5691998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016399742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025182117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015680823","doi":"","title":"US Hotel Industry Performance Outpacing Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic recovery; Hotel industry; Overtime; Restructuring; Stimulus (psychology); Hospitality industry; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.4077800970804639,"score_gpt":0.5271352526983022,"score_spread":0.11935515561783827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015680823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94353503,0.001121963,0.008340679,0.0014268437,0.00089716725,0.0001880737,0.000029691773,0.00018002742,0.04428054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98400235,0.00019221223,0.004561109,0.00025860043,0.00017664557,0.00002914085,0.000009507166,0.000028714281,0.010741721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055296,0.00018612907,0.0008494133,0.0010685873,0.006434065,0.000908823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340075,0.00208338,0.00026416266,0.0015686649,0.002185845,0.0004971967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005993378,0.00025099123,0.00040468483,0.024231566,0.0006114755,0.0025901506,0.002154295,0.0006240196,0.0023624406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019848902,0.0002053188,0.0002078006,0.17421755,0.00019855777,0.0008942086,0.0010238553,0.0015765515,0.0016502928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030278386,0.0004326231,0.49247095,0.000017362185,0.000055739718,0.00026973936,0.00055573764,0.0007707797,0.007134737,0.0027949899,0.040849917,0.45461717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017709376,0.00032825032,0.6635682,0.0001622234,0.000036588463,0.0002941566,0.008943266,0.023341134,0.069537744,0.011200589,0.21927893,0.0015379725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022426995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015546699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4530792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016928089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038241135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017159071","doi":"","title":"Advancing Waterfowl Ecology and Management: Assessments of an Online Course, Professional Credentials, and Graduate Student Publication Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TigerPrints (Clemson University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Outreach; Wildlife; Coursework; Nexus (standard); Graduate students; Publishing","score_opus":0.3545544243174834,"score_gpt":0.5155421950172021,"score_spread":0.1609877706997187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017159071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957301,0.000040572977,0.00030530457,0.0004738913,0.00023325204,0.00018660423,0.000024060886,0.000013554468,0.0029926286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866272,0.000898789,0.0020316702,0.0000375129,0.000014523324,7.8498897e-7,0.000023741719,0.0000056838167,0.0103600975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963442,0.00025898495,0.0003236592,0.00060723856,0.002137197,0.0003287091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971891,0.00029292319,0.00022160068,0.00040225137,0.0016229684,0.00027116112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034264335,0.00010759199,0.00022685874,0.009092155,0.00026058377,0.0003267504,0.00074009807,0.00006849089,0.00026647144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039155106,0.000095106225,0.000032157124,0.018783683,0.00015859703,0.0010118154,0.0014190527,0.00015659216,0.000017352235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000654152,0.0014596109,0.74600637,0.00007192366,0.00007928581,0.00011351955,0.00036214653,0.000040486902,0.0015984359,0.0023462924,0.00044876902,0.24740772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067002076,0.00011398707,0.9868196,0.000016706157,0.000018844437,0.000007650712,0.002911678,0.003275641,0.0009437844,0.00018656623,0.0049287453,0.000106723135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016269214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052873795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.247301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007802933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013129048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019169978","doi":"","title":"The evaluation of the biorefinery research: A scientometric approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DSpace (Sirnak University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biorefinery; Incentive; Scopus; Science Citation Index; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.8900642233575887,"score_gpt":0.613219212823936,"score_spread":0.27684501053365274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019169978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7997167,0.0020349568,0.00091056677,0.004673481,0.0010125947,0.00050950097,0.00002545366,0.000015730962,0.191101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570801,0.0003143756,0.0002864852,0.00002037668,0.000050327002,0.0000012004629,0.0000015148713,0.000006423877,0.042239174],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722638,0.003017596,0.00031703585,0.00069993344,0.023032904,0.0006687276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97138613,0.0072828913,0.0002785983,0.0018771762,0.0188991,0.00027608135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07023715,0.00010532159,0.00019091315,0.056093626,0.0015080852,0.0012952616,0.004485577,0.00010406565,0.00014071248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08960021,0.00005678674,0.000232524,0.578475,0.0009886562,0.00041333432,0.002504394,0.0004690616,0.00006905162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012686846,0.0012170278,0.17474173,0.000025145227,0.00017264133,0.000036976297,0.0015702639,0.002014895,0.011147467,0.15358937,0.17606758,0.47929004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013650659,0.00009640246,0.23045668,0.00001794409,0.000048673322,0.000012002956,0.021686226,0.025147812,0.0052021113,0.0074659134,0.70826113,0.00024003167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010264592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110432695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5321936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043288397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024651468","doi":"","title":"Rutherford's scientific impact from a bibliometric perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Web of science; Work (physics); Scientific literature","score_opus":0.668275655626309,"score_gpt":0.5722568035591731,"score_spread":0.0960188520671359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024651468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7902598,0.00064756506,0.0020351643,0.0001684035,0.00093698304,0.00020891553,0.0001492228,0.00005404375,0.20553991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139357,0.00004832836,0.0044943555,0.00004842756,0.000120982826,0.00001181005,0.0000047472313,0.00001973413,0.0038580275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860768,0.00027200714,0.0006363035,0.0013619399,0.010688734,0.00096425397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801076,0.0029948833,0.0002906643,0.0016920781,0.0061226683,0.0008889429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0171016,0.000232966,0.0003947736,0.5978645,0.0005205655,0.0049208757,0.003979255,0.00014782858,0.043261338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559654,0.00014855029,0.00037907707,0.865363,0.0005182336,0.0011445482,0.00087689847,0.00036262584,0.0055110967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017484998,0.0009070983,0.44867343,0.0000019170218,0.00012897747,0.00008307218,0.0037217673,0.0000042072834,0.024183206,0.00885185,0.12740394,0.3858657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004974398,0.00030283627,0.61444086,0.0000046087785,0.000010093376,0.0000059057784,0.0015760227,0.0019490124,0.0045030396,0.3697655,0.0066567394,0.00028794282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001313928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031320415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38557777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031889393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004439526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027134608","doi":"","title":"Collaboration trend in Indian Business-Management research: A bibliometric perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; Ranking (information retrieval); Productivity; Bibliometrics; Perspective (graphical); Private sector; Higher education","score_opus":0.4906960885201618,"score_gpt":0.5384972021556624,"score_spread":0.04780111363550066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027134608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93639964,0.00030668933,0.0023186763,0.006070237,0.00024166093,0.0005345036,0.000044278517,0.000026213249,0.054058082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927706,0.00032624704,0.0026169596,0.000026754275,0.000048819842,0.0000012077552,0.000006266337,0.000008425634,0.0041946867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897152,0.0007384784,0.00036119155,0.00084196846,0.0077320808,0.0006110555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890063,0.0035176899,0.00026453604,0.0007920869,0.006063965,0.00035542934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021082131,0.00013028114,0.00036355603,0.616949,0.0003974645,0.00075865793,0.0023870391,0.00016297666,0.0005109289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013334793,0.00013054973,0.00009548906,0.8783392,0.00040728695,0.0011607225,0.0010606265,0.00033831736,0.0003199158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032620394,0.0014888705,0.16017659,0.00007206345,0.00008154056,0.00029128513,0.008004699,0.0007293106,0.00059362047,0.04438474,0.069350086,0.71450096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001467775,0.0002172777,0.8820454,0.000026814505,0.0000056802887,0.000002152111,0.041657608,0.0028151341,0.000035232333,0.01973878,0.0518031,0.00018508226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015324963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054725134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72186875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046990823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002568957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028459977","doi":"","title":"Exploring Dissociation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Impact on Emotion, Cognition, and Daily Functioning Among Military Members, Veterans, and First Responders in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research; Mitacs; McMaster University","keywords":"Derealization; Depersonalization; Dissociation (chemistry); Dissociative; Hypervigilance; Cognition; Dissociative disorders; Poison control; Posttraumatic stress; Injury prevention","score_opus":0.142951924722821,"score_gpt":0.35208437980249324,"score_spread":0.20913245507967224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028459977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98891604,0.0008585241,0.0000137643965,0.00015410945,0.00046232482,0.00037688654,0.00016552658,0.000014895811,0.0090379445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98052037,0.00089285424,0.000014669565,0.00001531037,0.000020143774,0.0000045832912,0.0002271266,0.00002375704,0.018281184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995517,0.00029185132,0.0005250562,0.0008940884,0.0023090711,0.00046293956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972574,0.0015826779,0.00018250513,0.00023884013,0.00049222365,0.0002463354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016140679,0.0003120574,0.00042129678,0.020255433,0.00026013813,0.00062233873,0.0004647804,0.00016598377,0.0040006437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013275874,0.00028488046,0.000087069915,0.03392163,0.000057581907,0.0012535582,0.00013987039,0.00057107396,0.0000098858145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058143097,0.000099492936,0.7267249,0.00026784127,0.000096238546,0.00026390582,0.012747698,0.002369764,0.000012912411,0.000029076044,0.0006196261,0.2561871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068047567,0.00013276856,0.8464939,0.00046231542,0.00002944038,0.0000011581856,0.14736892,0.0035760782,0.000007380347,0.00007924794,0.0008980369,0.00027025066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67483974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98530203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3104623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013147369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005583652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029452250","doi":"","title":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (JELIS) Through Bibliometric Lenses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Information science; Work (physics); Bibliometrics; Documentation science; Style (visual arts); Association (psychology); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.28238344183632763,"score_gpt":0.4610325238676943,"score_spread":0.17864908203136665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029452250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786631,0.0010542778,0.009374059,0.0023679824,0.00080923946,0.00029907352,0.00009828857,0.000009428553,0.0073245424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98443896,0.0008666205,0.013563548,0.00017192935,0.0000401293,5.860849e-7,0.0000049678615,0.000003301876,0.000909976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468905,0.000091704314,0.00036432166,0.00021428525,0.0044200406,0.00022057373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947213,0.0018100119,0.0007385786,0.00026504707,0.0022775372,0.00018756044],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064952616,0.00006530366,0.00020693401,0.31483176,0.00078767026,0.0005881032,0.0020046125,0.000037479807,0.00040958583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052952585,0.00006277053,0.00010414801,0.54468304,0.00035755188,0.015557746,0.001127883,0.00015750254,0.000005715516],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025474172,0.0003842803,0.054740317,0.000041289593,0.00002043873,0.0000032240287,0.002091374,0.00019442619,0.001085679,0.026580464,0.04229307,0.8723107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012198503,0.0012454878,0.35095507,0.0000125858805,0.000018649353,0.000033103897,0.023983687,0.0025605694,0.00069609977,0.016820373,0.60227746,0.00017706412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000304266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.883345e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006771816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015950322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029718286","doi":"","title":"Leveraging Machine Learning to Investigate the Impact of NSERC Funding Programs on Research Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Random forest; Productivity; Excellence; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Impact assessment","score_opus":0.5238785425913034,"score_gpt":0.5380309938480166,"score_spread":0.014152451256713161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029718286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446163,0.00015755833,0.000008868584,0.0010079368,0.0010373049,0.0014646252,0.000023057679,0.00010674813,0.0515776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8012311,0.00018800139,0.000012461927,0.000004540863,0.00017400534,0.000014705274,0.000053409698,0.00007852861,0.19824325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96759814,0.0056185215,0.0010238119,0.0020342907,0.021007286,0.002717939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714269,0.018044814,0.0005408074,0.002135684,0.0063690017,0.0014828118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05580032,0.0005285526,0.0010398544,0.1329499,0.003448923,0.003842218,0.0082907695,0.0004918394,0.0001474303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04012489,0.00035292734,0.0009145241,0.22581878,0.0008833045,0.00052224565,0.0022324002,0.005718166,0.00076483825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009843772,0.0003006098,0.9586537,0.00007929993,0.00041542237,0.000888293,0.0034751892,0.0009806844,0.004417871,0.0009796215,0.008988444,0.0198365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067178236,0.003125679,0.95160484,0.00029204707,0.000022723461,0.0000084628755,0.020198075,0.0021028044,0.005104872,0.0034519483,0.012844036,0.0005727547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085851066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008760317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14666563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025437719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033199778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029755314","doi":"","title":"LIS Research Productivity According to Gender","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Proposition; Information science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Gender gap; Gender analysis","score_opus":0.8647703747500841,"score_gpt":0.6188742572802068,"score_spread":0.24589611746987727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029755314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567078,0.00027961243,0.006955533,0.0066178227,0.0003811314,0.00026700748,0.000036239606,0.000023980407,0.028730897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719158,0.000058610964,0.0071334927,0.000056817724,0.00011205033,4.4642923e-7,0.000002816959,0.000007978768,0.020711984],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888395,0.0006479852,0.00025106355,0.0010500539,0.008560369,0.0006510424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860894,0.003421744,0.00012054416,0.0011914416,0.0085823545,0.0005944795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019718155,0.00010391423,0.00033361992,0.031818848,0.0006609084,0.00061704236,0.002456161,0.00012641895,0.001367271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029502673,0.00010630807,0.00017348908,0.19980937,0.00024281291,0.0007457658,0.0030968986,0.00042756597,0.0009042266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016518257,0.00087477686,0.31221133,0.000040382594,0.000075744276,0.00049424614,0.003161448,0.00028976,0.03341309,0.005388242,0.12845527,0.51543057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080309407,0.00027760025,0.62374514,0.00002502,0.000011409001,0.000020447265,0.036198806,0.0016604696,0.0071614324,0.01557738,0.3141378,0.00038140258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036216533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026024377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51504916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018226879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007409473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030007273","doi":"","title":"Les représentations de nouveaux arrivants allophones envers leur apprentissage d'une langue seconde et leurs liens avec le progrès en compréhension orale du français dans les cours de francisation","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Derogation","score_opus":0.08828638221235763,"score_gpt":0.344886350139473,"score_spread":0.25659996792711537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030007273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91391945,0.0020924832,0.056553148,0.004737219,0.00088522164,0.0008826454,0.00029009127,0.0001647618,0.020474965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95145094,0.0022936645,0.007303987,0.00018941636,0.00032815145,0.000022439586,0.00014750482,0.0001931095,0.0380708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991142,0.0013920821,0.0008383358,0.0016938024,0.0035173637,0.0014164514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215704,0.003496664,0.0008081922,0.0013013654,0.0012059077,0.0010308062],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003756013,0.0007506306,0.00091831107,0.016056653,0.0018327152,0.0008751286,0.0029622067,0.00071562367,0.006879309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032078093,0.00074440765,0.0005948871,0.022349093,0.001423621,0.0008191993,0.0012338267,0.0009432529,0.0013420477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019439912,0.0009394399,0.36457682,0.00010513058,0.00034284286,0.00067796215,0.3747294,0.0014716337,0.0070911073,0.0011365135,0.035326328,0.21340844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024785255,0.0004174297,0.6320473,0.00020960163,0.00018754689,0.00018441372,0.17559657,0.028812569,0.000469054,0.00085692556,0.15766923,0.0010708728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6784429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7196207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26747048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001107468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023177245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030314469","doi":"","title":"Mixed-race Migration and Adoption in Gish Jen’s <i>The Love Wife</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.2880149556935347,"score_gpt":0.39876672882871383,"score_spread":0.11075177313517914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030314469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7560221,0.000024840552,0.0015795263,0.002257144,0.0003774546,0.000512712,0.000021512004,0.000031563053,0.23917314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719121,0.026885439,0.00060070446,0.000113858565,0.00006438271,0.0000012142846,0.000005260025,0.000009830239,0.00040724553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952629,0.00045381335,0.00029680147,0.00061611243,0.0029410142,0.00042934515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966379,0.0011753221,0.00017864912,0.00053475617,0.0012264064,0.00024696],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007168904,0.00015152071,0.00021918183,0.16245404,0.00013138117,0.0009372941,0.0012305651,0.00012934288,0.000027692953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005504847,0.00011037927,0.00007461021,0.29342136,0.00018126363,0.001256326,0.0006363307,0.00029674888,0.00017495854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000583602,0.0008210682,0.42990625,0.000025985417,0.000053247306,0.00038555005,0.02084524,0.0007783386,0.00007666477,0.0071785673,0.05354809,0.48579738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083440513,0.0001493326,0.010863551,0.000007346799,0.000007124466,0.000009334681,0.0061374614,0.005044513,0.0000996276,0.00003355704,0.97665894,0.00015481313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028134596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040125776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92311084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032910475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048819752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97833717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033055170","doi":"","title":"Paleomagnetic Determination of Vertical Axis Block Rotation near the Doty Fault in southwestern Washington","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western CEDAR (Western Washington University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clockwise; Paleomagnetism; Sinistral and dextral; Rotation (mathematics); Fault (geology); Forearc; Fault block; Shear (geology)","score_opus":0.19443540374839166,"score_gpt":0.4109280813885183,"score_spread":0.2164926776401266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033055170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958988,0.00003570674,0.0012483808,0.0009052018,0.00040658104,0.0004912937,0.00003818592,0.00009366883,0.00088217243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568474,0.00007345949,0.000117991,0.00006872838,0.000049767394,0.0000029605978,0.00001611469,0.000028304461,0.0039579473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914022,0.00072990084,0.00091913965,0.0009813346,0.0050230394,0.0009443759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936,0.0035934881,0.00034522,0.0010646355,0.0010831413,0.00031350023],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007381212,0.00030304567,0.0005098395,0.020168712,0.0004416766,0.001807487,0.0032503237,0.00026257275,0.000056819208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037473124,0.00023324706,0.00024264489,0.066520184,0.0005167244,0.0012756247,0.0012506983,0.000559861,0.00061227876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009584769,0.00013282223,0.9611608,0.000029190409,0.0000132982095,0.00011096497,0.0032588162,0.00051538326,0.0014901594,0.00012805284,0.000057528905,0.03300718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015498404,0.00037361166,0.97265303,0.0000790805,0.000031028525,0.000012593225,0.0039988123,0.013436187,0.0012225027,0.00048287696,0.0057713916,0.0003890517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050706026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002523902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046351474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024285572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026383135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034790765","doi":"","title":"ZENPod Season 5,Episode 8 with HK Venkatram","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Violin; Musical; Conversation; Brother; Popular music; Girl; Style (visual arts)","score_opus":0.07311664026062643,"score_gpt":0.343095489259554,"score_spread":0.2699788489989276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034790765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013021068,0.00093276985,0.0000025951906,0.00035970344,0.00039550546,0.0005370359,0.00038778328,0.00011642805,0.99713796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011350018,0.0003128418,0.0012503659,0.00024143433,0.00012970953,0.000026501726,0.00011558068,0.00011845634,0.9966701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890481,0.00025163058,0.000968779,0.0005566567,0.008551913,0.0006228827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951993,0.0011905634,0.001088409,0.0011026734,0.0010347618,0.000384294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004489812,0.00037184363,0.0006375236,0.00823446,0.00019773323,0.0007932561,0.0024539242,0.00033638394,0.8545258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037503645,0.00027861245,0.00024686585,0.002142684,0.00026882486,6.8387357e-7,0.0006563173,0.00060816226,0.022584124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073362506,0.000079684796,0.00018314394,0.00007035697,0.000046155572,0.00004116613,0.000046339534,0.00028990168,8.133901e-8,0.000035260797,0.9843263,0.014808255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005353506,0.00039887737,0.0001255562,0.00004212761,0.000021954393,0.00006752193,0.00020582187,0.00007562963,0.0000028886573,0.000036386176,0.9981371,0.0003507517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012502781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83194166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014432498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001325062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034947224","doi":"","title":"??++++™`¦¦? 1800-750-6584 ™œœ¦¦ Norton phone number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Telephone number; Service (business); Phone call; Helpline; Telephone line","score_opus":0.18944977047496306,"score_gpt":0.47298264068731977,"score_spread":0.28353287021235674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034947224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081343815,0.000018316856,0.0043131877,0.00050077116,0.0028172797,0.0014360842,0.00032345584,0.00032848274,0.98944896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035453062,0.0011715472,0.0016192172,0.00020882265,0.0006938589,0.00021450009,0.00003535102,0.0004805648,0.99203086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747448,0.0016639443,0.0019503812,0.007010588,0.012787573,0.00184271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752018,0.0049957936,0.001642533,0.01325666,0.0033831408,0.0015200957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048415884,0.00093310187,0.0015340694,0.031901706,0.00035749513,0.002675943,0.011792358,0.001323967,0.9829106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099561386,0.0007148576,0.0006887957,0.058634106,0.00074386544,0.0005566481,0.008988277,0.001324974,0.99459827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004884996,0.00033673723,0.028862128,0.00003619484,0.00016055258,0.00007739334,0.00009497004,0.000004865287,0.00030567485,0.0007691764,0.8375938,0.13170965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008596301,0.0000013420469,0.00638241,0.00013374578,0.000036904108,0.00004248812,0.000052037292,0.00009857099,0.0010056945,0.00590112,0.98462147,0.0008645628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011463565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025508204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14702769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000626164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009972068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036263172","doi":"","title":"Benzonitrile Adducts of Terminal Diarylphosphido Complexes: Preparative Sources of “Ru═PR&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Fusible alloy; Ocrelizumab; Diafiltration; Liquation; Proteogenomics","score_opus":0.3459166311947664,"score_gpt":0.4518197248748487,"score_spread":0.10590309368008233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036263172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97872,0.0033205843,0.00065818813,0.00010100038,0.0006923916,0.00070047355,0.00079166197,0.00006496435,0.014950734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946994,0.0005693993,0.002768802,0.00010583822,0.00024268197,0.00003751155,0.00004214473,0.000043724747,0.001490478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869146,0.00034497742,0.0018177934,0.0013997232,0.008269344,0.001253616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889551,0.0038823981,0.001399579,0.0014760119,0.0036451619,0.0006417868],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084757,0.0005371658,0.0013273722,0.009447707,0.00044182234,0.00050442584,0.0037522868,0.00049095723,0.0016935319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005261993,0.0004106386,0.00089156633,0.06257652,0.0012010997,0.00088418444,0.0012150052,0.0006012999,0.00033470412],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074526045,0.0028720847,0.2582364,0.0003368526,0.0007854356,0.0001432246,0.02688044,0.00011116133,0.16927752,0.0054391413,0.50095195,0.034220517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004177825,0.0030125687,0.36034217,0.00026446723,0.00021027592,0.00010627458,0.00793657,0.0043133483,0.5186807,0.019289598,0.07963225,0.0020339582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011350086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073890384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001390466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005500181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036482603","doi":"","title":"Canada Revenue Agency: 3 Pandemic Payments You Can Still Get in 2021 - NYSE (NYSE0001) News","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Revenue; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak","score_opus":0.3977127453922832,"score_gpt":0.511856808930045,"score_spread":0.11414406353776185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036482603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009373627,0.014031583,0.00014850128,0.002332103,0.004519573,0.0009497963,0.0028051068,0.00003261525,0.9658071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007578264,0.0041299895,0.0003823939,0.00075606565,0.0003029997,0.000026984228,0.000106388536,0.0001310602,0.98658586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847274,0.00048709055,0.0010492788,0.001591142,0.011040841,0.0011042359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950236,0.0013150681,0.00046960884,0.0016819759,0.0007596438,0.0007500967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00656841,0.0004025862,0.0008745516,0.050222337,0.00007418299,0.0011731233,0.003291987,0.00044200968,0.064347774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01451383,0.00029517617,0.00017250788,0.14913188,0.00009274503,0.00008852942,0.0010507177,0.0007026903,0.00026241897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025635054,0.000050780618,0.08217375,0.000009620106,0.000021045133,0.0002886945,0.000033866647,0.0000035488415,0.000024509884,0.000017911638,0.8469785,0.07039521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004012218,0.000023912045,0.015629824,0.0000776207,0.000005447558,0.0000062699746,0.00019212972,0.000105233965,0.00001709671,0.00043079074,0.9827344,0.00037604506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96358943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13575591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008235344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064936723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036710233","doi":"","title":"Call phone number@~@~+$+( 1 800 750 6584 )$$++ avg Antivirus tech Support Number norton Antivirus customer support phone number","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Phone call; Service (business); Telephone number; Telephone line","score_opus":0.1287256579939664,"score_gpt":0.445537274134258,"score_spread":0.3168116161402916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036710233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055341823,0.000008095282,0.0028402493,0.000529096,0.004003906,0.0020378768,0.0010449983,0.0005344436,0.98346716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036504954,0.0019843837,0.0020121632,0.0003769581,0.00082804693,0.00034818955,0.00012438763,0.0008058541,0.95701504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679955,0.0020617382,0.0032914546,0.00849984,0.014794203,0.0033572658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756314,0.005282424,0.0025004637,0.011460182,0.0030315332,0.002093963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04431103,0.0017806505,0.0027871735,0.019233683,0.00059962855,0.0027704411,0.011235818,0.0023479352,0.9890627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026344653,0.0014976283,0.0014376304,0.04718419,0.0016167277,0.0013334875,0.00962086,0.0024545542,0.9983678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013194564,0.0010655064,0.17740127,0.00008651752,0.0003512027,0.0004947351,0.00018835312,0.000003400086,0.0015686592,0.00032946793,0.7638856,0.05449332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016767094,0.0000021596315,0.01065369,0.00014787064,0.000115261944,0.00039085557,0.000070367925,0.000044696022,0.0056999126,0.001957413,0.9774263,0.001814791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003366019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045271646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21354066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011336153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018294093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036796793","doi":"","title":"The comprehensive osteoarthritis test (COAT): a simple index for measurement of treatment effects in clinical trials","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"WOMAC; Osteoarthritis; Context (archaeology); Clinical trial; Ordinal Scale; Scale (ratio); Severity of illness","score_opus":0.621138476071747,"score_gpt":0.5640080379549732,"score_spread":0.05713043811677376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036796793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754327,0.00074271427,0.016499074,0.0022145554,0.00034549698,0.0028136503,0.0005501368,0.000039969673,0.0013617084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998056,0.00012577348,0.00031375853,0.00004041736,0.0000587972,0.000026677797,0.000009579918,0.00001178567,0.0013572187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938674,0.00097112084,0.0013316793,0.0006931645,0.0026286717,0.0005079456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598402,0.03159067,0.0008786064,0.0011586966,0.0062085,0.00032337892],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024600986,0.00017438612,0.00060112565,0.011931173,0.0006113533,0.0010584841,0.0018432599,0.0001609601,0.00002683332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08649395,0.000114982766,0.00049687084,0.045849055,0.0005437702,0.00033925864,0.00029999705,0.00017304777,0.000071601964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004306245,0.0015229986,0.6286715,0.000015917385,0.00012665565,0.000012052094,0.00073563185,0.000651411,0.0006540951,0.015061368,0.0007195038,0.35139823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01722859,0.0023058497,0.39124736,0.00003690286,0.000044870045,0.00000289748,0.004147504,0.0007003274,0.0010102199,0.015042743,0.5678772,0.0003555661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048212428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012599684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070760236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010271912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037341950","doi":"","title":"Defensiveness and threat across the continuum of relative autonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Affect (linguistics); Disposition; Set (abstract data type); Self-determination theory; Personal autonomy","score_opus":0.20217502973075016,"score_gpt":0.42795490200577946,"score_spread":0.2257798722750293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037341950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98617023,0.00071753946,0.0010033003,0.0005492836,0.00039374997,0.00028723644,0.00006852336,0.000008874744,0.010801246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871373,0.00026771182,0.00037744647,0.000011355844,0.000027635193,3.3876603e-7,0.000025421321,0.000010590395,0.012142194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558526,0.00026801229,0.0002591883,0.00053137535,0.003026636,0.00032951043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161327,0.0032958146,0.0008385676,0.0006433607,0.0034754116,0.00013356321],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060731727,0.00017147035,0.00055936485,0.007196336,0.0004949157,0.00024538967,0.0018253512,0.00027007627,0.000027678416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034481774,0.00013183178,0.00021383971,0.021643173,0.00051533116,0.00037039572,0.00049880793,0.00033593443,0.000047154677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058907236,0.00019654729,0.82879555,0.00023407655,0.00037247498,0.000041928273,0.010087527,0.000029189765,0.0014759992,0.007485016,0.022240885,0.12845172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004426793,0.000119174794,0.9151957,0.00005060799,0.000041166128,0.0000015970104,0.061321624,0.00026740957,0.0005097981,0.002989253,0.018906875,0.0001541328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016758345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10631459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12829758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007966051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021434689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037765056","doi":"","title":"Excessiveness of current account deficits in Turkey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Cointegration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Current account; Cash flow; Cash; Forecast period; Operating cash flow","score_opus":0.35916696490517586,"score_gpt":0.5028574763744985,"score_spread":0.14369051146932266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037765056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98618734,0.0035795579,0.00047710774,0.00017494312,0.0015329892,0.00029220054,0.00005072781,0.000022014045,0.0076831095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970968,0.00009941534,0.00009331781,0.000019482693,0.00004514179,0.000014418613,0.00000544605,0.000011702791,0.0026143063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926544,0.00072257477,0.0006738196,0.0008109362,0.007952031,0.0005751983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994994,0.0021246744,0.0005508846,0.000784264,0.0012855702,0.00026059613],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071547516,0.00018612381,0.00043080468,0.031995535,0.0005133846,0.00040369006,0.0026622592,0.000065317334,0.0006103942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019684485,0.00016891019,0.00021894825,0.0881611,0.00014869256,0.00064263324,0.002083235,0.00052891707,0.00004642206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002525015,0.0008016433,0.9241076,0.000040608604,0.000028158842,0.00040261037,0.0010716281,0.01186018,0.012082217,0.00056060107,0.020917417,0.027874809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036083893,0.00069474935,0.7039572,0.000070771806,0.000048248206,0.00014297896,0.0135989515,0.032289304,0.013042543,0.0014082866,0.23000273,0.001135874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039986963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008038823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22015044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006383063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000488353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97897595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039203418","doi":"","title":"L'image de la femme à travers le contenu rédactionnel du magazine féminin québécois Elle Québec entre les années 2005 à 2009","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Le dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Verstehen; Undoing; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06565297172499163,"score_gpt":0.32227278140585514,"score_spread":0.2566198096808635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039203418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86566836,0.013182979,0.06131374,0.02245831,0.0024604464,0.0012615066,0.000760148,0.00030792132,0.032586575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911399,0.0029686943,0.0013738036,0.0002711593,0.00086888083,0.000050198494,0.0003710881,0.00012428175,0.0825729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871315,0.001247092,0.0016310011,0.002171212,0.0052565914,0.0025626407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869018,0.0044402136,0.0013968251,0.0014270385,0.0037295078,0.002104577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067861746,0.0013316547,0.0015627007,0.026944602,0.005323752,0.0022178902,0.004439004,0.0014750339,0.008888684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007989702,0.0013212748,0.0012713403,0.034466356,0.002932448,0.004431017,0.000734497,0.0019243247,0.004707212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028653985,0.009352446,0.39654663,0.000745324,0.0017603701,0.0019106189,0.121534295,0.012945911,0.023563799,0.04828556,0.23391123,0.1465784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005990995,0.0003930692,0.3622721,0.00030432685,0.0004319231,0.00035054598,0.121905535,0.043925263,0.000921956,0.00022931072,0.46128175,0.0019932352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9540109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2273705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003984708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017376415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039874808","doi":"","title":"A microflow cytometer with simultaneous dielectrophoretic actuation for the optical assay and capacitive cytometry of individual fluid suspended bioparticles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CMC Microsystems; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Fusible alloy; Articular cartilage damage","score_opus":0.12350955709199413,"score_gpt":0.37530710804400685,"score_spread":0.2517975509520127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039874808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901977,0.00070457184,0.0072819153,0.0005528031,0.00009050975,0.00066382607,0.00013574869,0.0000104030305,0.00036252345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671197,0.00037757048,0.0023790777,0.0000132006135,0.0000234299,0.0000011105717,0.00006018096,0.000012887237,0.00042057657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947078,0.00014198643,0.00027317263,0.00057977275,0.00388219,0.00041506515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98797095,0.008288487,0.00048557465,0.0004221798,0.0026662983,0.00016653983],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00433466,0.00021831637,0.00050757336,0.013490167,0.00034389494,0.0003790742,0.001364788,0.00025448078,0.000020400488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006177891,0.00015760092,0.00016607641,0.023977218,0.00044525508,0.00024270298,0.00014838301,0.0002918217,0.000007947799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008909345,0.0011849877,0.03127998,0.0003641897,0.0014603476,0.00019614887,0.0055703907,0.00022624459,0.22832294,0.0025644288,0.007073954,0.71284705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003730471,0.0056482526,0.7552368,0.00019648908,0.0009129774,0.000032917542,0.11184496,0.015825812,0.101097,0.0029471081,0.0016057433,0.0009214889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014620909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016999051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7239568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100650854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020616097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042471984","doi":"","title":"Physiotherapy Graduate Program Handbooks, 2020-2021","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"MEDLINE; Rehabilitation; Program evaluation; Attendance","score_opus":0.6409493764086696,"score_gpt":0.6250321996549898,"score_spread":0.015917176753679763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042471984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026107482,0.0034678646,0.002053275,0.002218854,0.0011173473,0.0010613367,0.00010244364,0.00031544655,0.9896373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003191367,0.0039150403,0.007894502,0.00054226763,0.0011221603,0.00006774659,0.000025953606,0.00031755934,0.9857956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98299444,0.0002270254,0.00066535285,0.0015894714,0.013730359,0.00079335977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956668,0.0009480177,0.00042556718,0.0013536952,0.00081320445,0.0007927222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042851293,0.00041475068,0.000794258,0.042346794,0.00011874679,0.0041030524,0.004009262,0.0003504256,0.08017572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00529675,0.00025746835,0.0004213078,0.1746355,0.00022682492,0.00013763315,0.00077348016,0.00052701833,0.0133621665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048434445,0.000089722584,0.00015262754,0.0000058124847,0.000031923617,0.000022707089,0.000011839963,1.729998e-7,0.000047572103,0.000116777854,0.6130292,0.3864868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036472108,0.00023816772,0.00045302263,0.000025602229,0.0000053943545,0.0000020535526,0.000045669127,0.00067166815,0.00015455882,0.001543151,0.99614006,0.00035594552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042755765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010117383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38613084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050536033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002827685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042655142","doi":"","title":"Pourquoi les chercheures se déplacent : social capital et les forces motrices de la mobilité académique en Italie","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flemish; Human capital; Social capital; Social mobility; Phenomenon; Academic community; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.16218680860114415,"score_gpt":0.4612764391608711,"score_spread":0.2990896305597269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042655142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8271404,0.002578749,0.056782488,0.028199807,0.00011412182,0.00036119937,0.000068853784,0.00013204514,0.084622346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96236014,0.0010102278,0.008918374,0.00018806163,0.000027923592,0.000052486248,0.000031929274,0.000023276812,0.027387595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783871,0.016052863,0.00084400474,0.0010330462,0.0029426345,0.0007403566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943335,0.04846137,0.000456762,0.0014426333,0.005931023,0.00037320153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.073708355,0.0002958419,0.00041472263,0.0086019235,0.0009543128,0.003281426,0.0036432026,0.00047908246,0.00038803762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0774915,0.00024848213,0.0003128601,0.027521376,0.0006551421,0.0005467797,0.0016459225,0.00089933845,0.000053765525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054466745,0.0013809483,0.14908913,0.00007796434,0.00011978461,0.000015617548,0.02044562,0.000104501065,0.010995677,0.42225927,0.01808684,0.37737018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021488697,0.0000057936177,0.57995576,0.0003811809,0.000060089722,0.000025516261,0.008878584,0.021602338,0.07746134,0.09179153,0.21667285,0.0010161753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025448273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010661957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4308666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025681252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069639983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067087487","doi":"","title":"La mosaïque comme métaphore de l'autre dans Les aurores montréales de Monique Proulx","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07636404232255865,"score_gpt":0.3183281184565788,"score_spread":0.24196407613402016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067087487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06205009,0.0064082663,0.0025599555,0.011375459,0.0003244703,0.00056859665,0.0014778897,0.000021943522,0.91521335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4672438,0.00676013,0.004290443,0.0010515053,0.00018132513,0.000036014888,0.00001761281,0.00013260766,0.52028656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853302,0.0009250343,0.0008737075,0.00095047196,0.0105434125,0.0013771609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99190867,0.005136506,0.0005924616,0.00077679683,0.00001243635,0.0015731581],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005156708,0.0006036475,0.0008167957,0.0031640644,0.00054347253,0.000724734,0.0025853838,0.00032065963,0.0019929365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044549748,0.000513897,0.00015439295,0.009888186,0.0007625503,0.00051527965,0.0008627174,0.0008746575,8.1945544e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026373458,0.00023680106,0.6342433,0.00034769299,0.00022965335,0.0014612145,0.00064103416,0.00030086073,0.0051922924,0.07698161,0.06151684,0.21858498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005332584,0.00017407972,0.19241565,0.00038130966,0.000040880066,0.00008617233,0.0077363504,0.009517977,0.013098018,0.0053910483,0.7699563,0.000668974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111930005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29990944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7084394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013114685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010178944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7087762849","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17312776","title":"napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for Python","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Zoom; Python (programming language); Documentation; Image manipulation; Checklist; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.3765012431729193,"score_gpt":0.47974879070591564,"score_spread":0.10324754753299636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7087762849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003795273,0.0012539894,0.061303724,0.0012508883,0.00090690184,0.0017718705,0.0034378315,0.0008465801,0.9291903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00074228353,0.00037756367,0.010982097,0.000358431,0.00043048043,4.1756434e-7,0.0019088766,0.0051182974,0.98008156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160683,0.00063032133,0.00070379756,0.0014540087,0.0047410293,0.0008640182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072164,0.00072630483,0.00042650264,0.0014243192,0.0062022517,0.0004989796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104607735,0.00033171521,0.0005192179,0.032393087,0.0018616226,0.006105513,0.0052796444,0.00032838277,0.0968981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04695198,0.00027892587,0.0002738678,0.039443325,0.0003553216,0.00027273595,0.0044152895,0.00052683696,0.027048392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003397679,0.00018411584,0.0000017580837,0.000047635305,0.00004750081,0.000008593004,0.000039863782,0.0000039085244,0.00038630128,0.0012788512,0.8536932,0.14427434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008575667,0.00016950333,0.00012279947,0.000067097615,0.000016497097,0.000014940769,0.00006312946,0.0015876109,0.00009913314,0.0006134792,0.9960886,0.00029963793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006252932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020424134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14397469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022983928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045731194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093096134","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17410105","title":"Laying the groundwork: Preparing researchers for the revisedTri-Agency open access policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Laying; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.6943885888534266,"score_gpt":0.5907646996692758,"score_spread":0.10362388918415077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093096134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011832017,0.002524272,0.10379387,0.062234644,0.000752888,0.00696694,0.00029658925,0.00045565507,0.8111431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96639067,0.0013105426,0.00038070878,0.001372391,0.00040190454,0.000002565536,0.00010557173,0.00059480104,0.029440861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992479,0.0013004094,0.00066761265,0.0009395753,0.0036506378,0.00096272747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747706,0.0044693835,0.00027588353,0.0021371872,0.0053189634,0.00032154558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043517716,0.0001746938,0.0002496824,0.011242832,0.010555356,0.052738857,0.0270264,0.000087586915,0.003845747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119942956,0.000101825564,0.0001627187,0.0964931,0.0004979917,0.001672139,0.025758727,0.0005763291,0.0015576333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000780142,0.000057624857,0.000099986144,0.000015711605,0.000041485688,0.000001189438,0.00031621126,0.00010337847,0.00017892549,0.024074128,0.44461426,0.5304191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048776614,0.00008643268,0.006560592,0.000026558682,0.000010542219,0.000007986011,0.00085740926,0.003384455,0.00009587958,0.011573345,0.9767857,0.00012333094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030635155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025078455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004185233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009991146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093298898","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17427187","title":"Who owns our knowledge? A data feminist perspective on closed research infrastructure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Presentation (obstetrics); Perspective (graphical); Citation; Data access; Data presentation; Scholarly communication","score_opus":0.5017717238498743,"score_gpt":0.5496287742648531,"score_spread":0.047857050414978786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093298898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013622928,0.00056020817,0.0028142103,0.010746202,0.000584665,0.0010470008,0.0012518414,0.00040180853,0.96897113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770735,0.00020646826,0.0002247766,0.00034385858,0.00030145352,1.3573107e-7,0.00043698106,0.00051967363,0.02089316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98783463,0.0021216145,0.00066072657,0.0018882983,0.006390697,0.0011040384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820112,0.0011629002,0.0001837543,0.0035140405,0.012543974,0.0005841425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02899873,0.00024369721,0.00036924792,0.034127012,0.005510461,0.011110885,0.013937691,0.00019898119,0.005058933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10742156,0.00019873258,0.0001036101,0.11364614,0.00050218496,0.0006464907,0.0152215315,0.0014130669,0.014114512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010490017,0.00023610049,0.00007067584,0.000013475242,0.000029432831,0.000014974103,0.00084497716,0.000020775338,0.0003604415,0.03724962,0.7804925,0.18056215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006623814,0.00036532088,0.008738704,0.000042723845,0.000006571718,0.000018721625,0.0078423815,0.0027034483,0.00016780096,0.009299797,0.969957,0.00019514453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005348526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026971124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96345055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000937111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010427065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095057608","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2036425.1546","title":"Bibliometric analysis of Iranian Authors in High-Impact Medical Science Journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Specialty; Citation impact; MEDLINE; Middle East","score_opus":0.7670192304732296,"score_gpt":0.7585526557240697,"score_spread":0.008466574749159905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095057608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96772057,0.02188068,0.0025643564,0.00069009466,0.0010713887,0.0003983617,0.00010146122,0.000013647288,0.005559467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98307055,0.015899427,0.0002833873,0.0001845247,0.00005398226,0.0000108894665,0.000002957689,0.000018058365,0.00047621294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604772,0.001314792,0.0043598628,0.0014786981,0.030939547,0.0014299509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730673,0.011525346,0.0025966812,0.0017839007,0.009195717,0.0018310866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14015329,0.00041792213,0.0024965522,0.932267,0.000553382,0.01531097,0.028213944,0.00032921834,0.04238243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17344816,0.00028939274,0.00089417247,0.976887,0.0012697957,0.0068269814,0.0064069307,0.0012395588,0.000031808846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088051595,0.00048039143,0.81760377,0.0000138502955,0.00037523208,0.000053478532,0.000049430953,0.0008511286,0.008150949,0.00015721921,0.013010899,0.1591656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006510754,0.000026322168,0.9786157,0.0002022909,0.0001461435,0.000005071041,0.000103262246,0.0049044266,0.004072289,0.010004878,0.0009823772,0.00028617174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046874583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002452989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16101193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005795046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003202426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995583},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7095063509","doi":"10.22034/ijism.2025.2037025.1552","title":"Citation analysis of Muslim scholars of the Islamic Golden Age on the Web of Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Citation analysis; Islamic studies; Subject (documents); Citation; Sharia","score_opus":0.7356534755010881,"score_gpt":0.7075116164701988,"score_spread":0.028141859030889282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095063509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98325807,0.0018640892,0.00024930868,0.00052760396,0.00047730384,0.0004037697,0.00007929169,0.00000335715,0.013137223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971333,0.0020041831,0.000070574926,0.00014298677,0.000011618427,0.0000075687262,9.500438e-7,0.0000069775856,0.00062182173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856868,0.0008612298,0.0017220981,0.00059438724,0.010741996,0.00039350797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982227,0.008258634,0.0021580006,0.0015893254,0.005643684,0.00012331242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048722237,0.00017615507,0.0008668732,0.10228952,0.00046454876,0.0029610614,0.017569873,0.00008434347,0.002515436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055162206,0.000092372684,0.0005319895,0.4235619,0.0017248951,0.0020277558,0.0031801758,0.00044529556,0.000005035453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005655185,0.00026991125,0.68797624,0.000020099003,0.00032242428,0.000002037213,0.00032648948,0.0010912332,0.27531126,0.002504455,0.007931291,0.024187993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018880502,0.000013998952,0.9167408,0.00011870054,0.00012072903,2.6263376e-7,0.00067420333,0.0025636223,0.06560785,0.013525738,0.0003558305,0.00008949307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063935586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009594613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013221586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009806784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095226389","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Private sector; Quarter (Canadian coin); German","score_opus":0.6626260073294132,"score_gpt":0.5997115490804761,"score_spread":0.06291445824893716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095226389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34337476,0.0009897999,0.0045231157,0.0019809185,0.00036362326,0.00011798094,0.000036036297,0.000054592376,0.64855915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938558,0.0000686094,0.0016363167,0.00015220951,0.000100182806,0.0000049567348,0.0000061195765,0.000003943829,0.10417188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141717,0.00011784422,0.0005019712,0.0005035369,0.0069957334,0.00046376415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934828,0.0039068316,0.00010896678,0.0005507028,0.0017468154,0.00020385961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008424325,0.00009823097,0.00019734338,0.028765814,0.00039155243,0.0023169438,0.0018914535,0.00007676979,0.012546184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011922285,0.00005476782,0.00009301481,0.1270252,0.00015292208,0.00041667704,0.00063715037,0.00012100676,0.0016652625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043977134,0.00010227061,0.10415296,0.0000010462309,0.0000032236114,0.0000086484815,0.00001772139,0.000056262656,0.001508306,0.074566536,0.7702161,0.049362533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022329202,0.00008100836,0.12353061,0.0000032081123,0.0000020259833,0.0000042800652,0.00046462336,0.0021486965,0.0029327325,0.15261318,0.71781874,0.00017761908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003707671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.550481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031748248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012496173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095848360","doi":"","title":"VARIATIONS IN LAKE LEVELS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.816235350570408,"score_gpt":0.6353197372167319,"score_spread":0.18091561335367612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095848360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3361349,0.0000800605,0.3221522,0.021585718,0.00076678034,0.00025900817,0.00013956532,0.000050732975,0.31883103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96252996,0.000013892331,0.0014043583,0.00012491783,0.000024368179,0.000004332286,1.6418882e-7,0.000002362136,0.03589562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994958,0.00009575647,0.00035401664,0.0003321358,0.0039547314,0.00030536685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932193,0.005285399,0.000049481387,0.00042752668,0.0008570576,0.00016122828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013305373,0.00004691516,0.000103025544,0.04878472,0.000053400716,0.00057949044,0.0010914453,0.000045253946,0.013816267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04175641,0.00002072152,0.000042954503,0.16339733,0.00004629204,0.00046976504,0.00026801552,0.00004904344,0.003168952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023150574,0.00006323061,0.44847012,1.9490298e-7,0.0000016906894,0.000005080933,0.000027055665,0.0000015011371,0.0015757058,0.038758557,0.020613244,0.49048132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002844379,0.000019758385,0.8303284,0.0000017653712,2.1797047e-7,9.485113e-7,0.000020957094,0.00035501842,0.00040982035,0.054289673,0.11423296,0.000056071214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022275099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082219427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62639505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038190727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000947455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095962814","doi":"","title":"University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century†","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Work (physics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.4324468135178181,"score_gpt":0.5336707112954057,"score_spread":0.10122389777758756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095962814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93030787,0.0005359432,0.00021318624,0.011387891,0.00012263459,0.00034458932,0.0000117428135,0.000005126253,0.057071034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979267,0.00010887846,0.00014701829,0.0002700216,0.000019920988,9.745727e-7,0.0000013773691,0.0000013431902,0.001523724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952261,0.00051835395,0.0001721387,0.0002989246,0.0034868587,0.00029764988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979534,0.0011004775,0.00003917151,0.00045893205,0.0003229895,0.00012500958],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021507632,0.000075350436,0.0000979313,0.02007382,0.00007825469,0.0023922112,0.0017356502,0.00004884102,0.00006203783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083235366,0.000028477802,0.000044972825,0.1342373,0.000060059567,0.00041597086,0.00028402806,0.00022651345,0.00005100218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007938957,0.00029417747,0.58482724,0.0000052764685,0.0000115314815,0.0004175443,0.014445365,0.000023544691,0.000004343944,0.011241779,0.3221675,0.06648234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046359017,0.00009167913,0.8726871,0.000004077797,0.000001620001,0.000008607026,0.029958043,0.0008778555,4.0479145e-7,0.003293218,0.09255476,0.000059038495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012999163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089887326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2878599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006558064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026820222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095969181","doi":"","title":"THE QUÉBEC-LABRADOR IRON ORE MINING REGION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Iron ore; Promotion (chess); Valorisation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5306900902771402,"score_gpt":0.5405207071261505,"score_spread":0.00983061684901032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095969181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79298806,0.0007429988,0.022694098,0.02584093,0.0009438087,0.00020226101,0.0000010537898,0.00006811914,0.15651867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382223,0.0000725407,0.00056806183,0.00038063055,0.000118078286,0.000004752958,2.8313306e-7,0.0000065129097,0.060626872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271876,0.00024400771,0.00041761828,0.0004635998,0.0056764423,0.00047956032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846559,0.012778129,0.00014356013,0.0009780258,0.0011640036,0.00028037946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018400658,0.00009106169,0.0001406556,0.013294794,0.0006666856,0.0029079446,0.0024418526,0.000062605366,0.00036620395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058685575,0.000040583236,0.0000937303,0.09059628,0.00019197157,0.00028654665,0.00049966836,0.00013649314,0.0009782627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006656244,0.00001591987,0.03545272,5.6031257e-7,0.0000017924187,0.0000017728789,0.00007756062,0.0000065829295,0.000050965336,0.004560293,0.20434421,0.75548095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021901894,0.00013085923,0.076793395,0.000002389651,0.0000016534789,0.000008152721,0.00087484246,0.01879691,0.00023789174,0.0038784444,0.8989378,0.00011862069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018092385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023043645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75536233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005814615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014206085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096011743","doi":"","title":"Scatter and obsolescence of journals cited in theses and dissertations of librarianshipi","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Bibliometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Editorial board; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Citation","score_opus":0.6386111613696178,"score_gpt":0.5958723991812674,"score_spread":0.04273876218835038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096011743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921112,0.0009036929,0.00082805107,0.0007988532,0.000020743271,0.000066353874,0.0000068729487,0.0000020464618,0.0052621923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980519,0.00013436795,0.0010990804,0.000023950439,0.000005918668,9.579511e-7,3.5904065e-7,0.000002075282,0.0006814256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973485,0.00008139107,0.0005036308,0.00019934426,0.001717673,0.00014948558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959673,0.0030554608,0.00014245581,0.0001736504,0.00057971844,0.00008136038],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003965481,0.00004909446,0.00017157328,0.026524147,0.000037271548,0.00046513454,0.00039638169,0.000037341626,0.0002269863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005631313,0.000029960194,0.0000249238,0.067012906,0.00017068938,0.00048190288,0.00013022356,0.000068649235,0.000002119614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005720139,0.000054353764,0.9756081,0.0000040448144,0.0000013307729,9.3354487e-7,0.000082139704,0.0000058686014,0.010157056,0.00259424,0.00040317382,0.011083016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015447251,0.000027671296,0.97504175,0.000016165213,9.800154e-7,0.0000017102656,0.00051155273,0.00091239123,0.008266948,0.014974286,0.00005594219,0.000036129633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037113667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118360476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04048876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039250435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038162714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98450935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096083010","doi":"","title":"The effects of aging on researchers&amp;apos; publication and citation patterns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publication; Citation; Citation impact; Point (geometry); Sample (material); Turning point; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.8591503029328854,"score_gpt":0.6402291303600391,"score_spread":0.21892117257284627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096083010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863527,0.00037810815,0.0023528815,0.0031495506,0.0001309778,0.00021540077,0.0000030685042,0.000011136298,0.0074062087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915713,0.000986421,0.00021549338,0.000098154735,0.000022003422,0.000009559557,0.000002302546,0.00000387822,0.0070908796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312043,0.00029845798,0.00031920391,0.0003138217,0.0056653204,0.0002827342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772061,0.019680018,0.00013196039,0.0005204922,0.0022748264,0.0001866198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013342984,0.00005905871,0.000100700156,0.017801676,0.00041881882,0.0008906512,0.00082851615,0.0000415619,0.000085576416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0821932,0.000030414218,0.00003713627,0.057358425,0.00018767228,0.0003424387,0.00024027086,0.00014567832,0.00010367734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021339843,0.00011011762,0.3428033,0.000018667517,0.000013625059,0.0000032738963,0.00070830336,0.000002963338,0.0030313167,0.0065690647,0.04870377,0.5980143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034457905,0.00022790636,0.961128,0.000009927376,0.0000012414727,0.0000040545706,0.000266929,0.0009294954,0.0058274013,0.0038172859,0.027365677,0.000077519166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014416839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003424579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003481365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006487866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096246290","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Work (physics); Decantation","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096246290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096372346","doi":"","title":"2007a), “An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Pound (networking); Quarter (Canadian coin); Reliability (semiconductor)","score_opus":0.6132578866264293,"score_gpt":0.6102705573489217,"score_spread":0.0029873292775076665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096372346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82915497,0.0010356206,0.16781643,0.0007645497,0.00012490127,0.00042951238,0.000016820253,0.0000045506904,0.00065265206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243564,0.00019891957,0.017061194,0.000038941682,0.000017514378,0.0000060649286,1.943903e-7,0.000003903695,0.00023762608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941054,0.00021381289,0.001001287,0.00043254383,0.003985744,0.00026122303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441944,0.04225365,0.0005891878,0.0012090722,0.011376577,0.00037715046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.073589616,0.00007449133,0.0001917159,0.011906359,0.00019613009,0.0008393719,0.0017636765,0.0000908877,0.000043747732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37176904,0.00004010849,0.00010336499,0.060434893,0.00029759348,0.0019356416,0.00035463658,0.00014194546,0.000002052079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000367563,0.00012548539,0.49787244,0.000005534362,0.0000032625314,8.6623395e-8,0.00012017433,0.000075006355,0.0029362608,0.0014372388,0.0011806028,0.49620715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001637393,0.00017771225,0.9603223,0.000028631019,0.0000051698,0.0000034258562,0.00031393298,0.0012645897,0.002533797,0.03465499,0.0004836777,0.00004803131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008028034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060860686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4961591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057893143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020211743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096388414","doi":"","title":"Articles Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Documentation; Process (computing); Performance indicator; Key (lock); Impact factor","score_opus":0.9584063099386335,"score_gpt":0.724541313555245,"score_spread":0.23386499638338853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096388414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737678,0.0011891617,0.004559473,0.008649496,0.0002903068,0.0020992314,0.000024280245,0.00001717944,0.009403079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944108,0.000432721,0.0007450515,0.000039055536,0.00013746618,0.00036133468,3.237358e-7,0.000014278272,0.0038589647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9278082,0.003508154,0.0015656443,0.0012734386,0.06391632,0.0019282184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80724967,0.070224114,0.00024784275,0.0025356757,0.119252026,0.000490658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5495245,0.00014100487,0.0002874494,0.2632098,0.0013498451,0.0019678683,0.0035681203,0.00013105167,0.0022488239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45809004,0.000058277874,0.00017480277,0.64496255,0.0011808438,0.0008902519,0.0013002953,0.0003789821,0.00080844475],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013217404,0.00021139019,0.011508555,0.000016524917,0.000021634763,0.00001775694,0.00015472679,0.000008655333,0.00462138,0.007468372,0.072868355,0.9029705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008122195,0.0072175376,0.11024629,0.00022549076,0.00004747325,0.0006003267,0.012078442,0.07362654,0.24560574,0.3406501,0.20067684,0.00090299535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002911305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009773673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000536864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015482495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096520032","doi":"","title":"1 An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals:","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Pound (networking); Quality (philosophy); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.4815519233644152,"score_gpt":0.5593878040664252,"score_spread":0.07783588070200997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096520032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97605675,0.00022973493,0.0030961635,0.00025936568,0.00013176711,0.0001322606,0.0000099757,0.0000054215793,0.020078547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972456,0.000015751746,0.0012067242,0.000012874297,0.000024541789,0.0000012548476,3.148949e-7,0.000002591852,0.0014903567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971045,0.0005569154,0.0007791467,0.00028721266,0.00848145,0.00018481788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893276,0.0023319493,0.00040463766,0.0009716595,0.0068663643,0.00009777732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038169805,0.00005595371,0.00016321278,0.015576848,0.00010424641,0.001011736,0.0022902072,0.000068091475,0.00041129917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04685833,0.000026894126,0.00010525817,0.11411069,0.00021538066,0.0014181867,0.0002439399,0.00015967582,0.000011223059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006807489,0.00037767654,0.8674052,0.000004214374,0.0000020735265,3.9977115e-7,0.000050882147,0.0006699508,0.021802366,0.002074431,0.0035034877,0.10410256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011819886,0.00008323856,0.9545356,0.0000034834075,0.000001766471,0.0000011160992,0.0000792578,0.0035565998,0.019829825,0.02104506,0.00071224826,0.0000335974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004055389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033183198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104068965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003484977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012042528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99558073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096571529","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); General interest; Extant taxon","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096571529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096803016","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Theodolite; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096803016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096817203","doi":"","title":"COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Work safety; Workplace safety","score_opus":0.9104718539259924,"score_gpt":0.669869234089787,"score_spread":0.24060261983620534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096817203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.215178,0.00013277074,0.18491986,0.003731484,0.00061444356,0.000112098656,0.000002714584,0.000056090586,0.5952525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759685,0.00001826189,0.0016870381,0.00075223466,0.000059428476,0.0000033852873,4.1952185e-7,0.0000035448609,0.021507205],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928249,0.00017654044,0.0003607579,0.00040808338,0.005822991,0.00040672842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321735,0.004422664,0.00007328346,0.0007906552,0.0011405635,0.00035547756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020617988,0.000067874076,0.00014664145,0.018659564,0.0001814314,0.0013872054,0.0020055857,0.000047342277,0.004668311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032417644,0.000040309686,0.000074644435,0.116104715,0.00009480217,0.00028853168,0.00050655875,0.00010848157,0.0057391594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051481106,0.00008571265,0.13961536,8.98018e-7,0.0000029900239,0.0000017943618,0.00007065563,0.000039507027,0.00050259684,0.051394828,0.263931,0.5443495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020459223,0.00013008222,0.06686725,0.0000011929528,9.187775e-7,0.0000027213562,0.00016972894,0.04336808,0.0032172275,0.093942575,0.7919485,0.00014712747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057241763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012708199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76079047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016999791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034846256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096841259","doi":"","title":"Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Bibliometrics; Perspective (graphical); Order (exchange); Web of science; Information system","score_opus":0.7104587863483294,"score_gpt":0.5599914982932118,"score_spread":0.15046728805511755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096841259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887248,0.00003619725,0.006297264,0.0004160996,0.000052356827,0.0003572987,0.00026912885,0.000009516665,0.0038373377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987784,0.000020689995,0.00014358018,0.00006815401,0.000009333605,6.6002457e-7,0.000004991104,0.000005830792,0.00096833793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959535,0.001047461,0.0006724826,0.0009458484,0.007382758,0.00035609453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704817,0.022543043,0.00057254353,0.0036538471,0.0024087315,0.00034012782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036883797,0.00017909441,0.0006926326,0.75836414,0.0002143486,0.00066910044,0.0030344983,0.000076841294,0.0002491142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04747846,0.00009085402,0.00026057073,0.9133988,0.00023391537,0.00034709251,0.0011215956,0.00019750014,0.000014274594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019355741,0.0013612576,0.9079389,0.0000059239123,0.00045276748,0.00014923899,0.00025717582,0.0005970347,0.000024580831,0.00013091473,0.01122577,0.07766286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008088789,0.0015999783,0.77874756,0.0000038041537,0.00021422554,0.0000053528483,0.0046788263,0.21299137,0.00003578137,0.00003457784,0.000764987,0.000114642105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005917748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038183035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21239434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006538398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014666184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917308},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7097082144","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Actuary; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097082144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097158276","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Canadian Contributions to the","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Legislation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.7230730950904918,"score_gpt":0.6148379082368117,"score_spread":0.10823518685368005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097158276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8034886,0.0000700087,0.032448355,0.005210264,0.00023511832,0.00026718268,0.00067236094,0.000012112193,0.15759598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788755,0.000007640937,0.00061359955,0.00035733086,0.00001030472,0.0000035848427,0.0000028519125,0.0000013234411,0.0011158013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962592,0.00012115241,0.0003042056,0.00025025592,0.002751853,0.00031331525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381477,0.00083135365,0.000051916817,0.0008661232,0.0036702729,0.000765596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013913454,0.00004184637,0.00015580007,0.21494128,0.00017811947,0.00038137694,0.002225716,0.000034170058,0.0062730224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015522459,0.000020046982,0.000113738,0.5981217,0.00006039357,0.00016189892,0.00010320847,0.000055845696,0.00033096538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009808595,0.0001492499,0.7772798,1.979922e-7,0.00022245923,0.0000049582127,0.0013260536,0.00039499305,0.00037466246,0.10431102,0.064072825,0.051854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000345501,0.00006954475,0.94133073,1.5011706e-7,0.000032220632,1.9515825e-7,0.00068539794,0.0097121755,0.0008021707,0.0011210805,0.04616823,0.00004354295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45817265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6458614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3831804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053341104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024658695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097313532","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Extant taxon; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097313532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097367846","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.7595070969323877,"score_gpt":0.6205012030570045,"score_spread":0.1390058938753832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097367846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18788046,0.001113782,0.005358557,0.0008683429,0.0005183819,0.0001268526,0.00001809982,0.000037789152,0.80407774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92089826,0.00021160993,0.002764764,0.0002763736,0.000022707552,0.0000055203877,0.0000014233634,0.000004180382,0.075815156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916529,0.00027187986,0.00044745093,0.0005218756,0.0066225883,0.0004833098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917381,0.005196125,0.00010229761,0.00066898315,0.0018926692,0.00040181464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014567502,0.00009956419,0.0002034374,0.026458357,0.0004061932,0.0019308937,0.0016065481,0.00007796685,0.027363878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06854477,0.000055355136,0.000090491776,0.13743556,0.00013926734,0.00040207678,0.00032953153,0.00014129674,0.001954891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004813718,0.00014295733,0.10899374,0.0000018066798,0.000010742125,0.000011839784,0.00011137965,0.000026777578,0.0012919587,0.32443836,0.49313346,0.07183218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018927357,0.000082454615,0.011260587,0.0000024520289,0.0000016393689,0.0000059423646,0.001233777,0.00038670652,0.0038627514,0.08719495,0.895636,0.00014347269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001082711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057905007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7330178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029696495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021188216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097396566","doi":"","title":"THE SPATIAL LINKAGES OF MANUFACTURING IN MONTREAL AND ITS SURROUNDINGS l","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Valorisation","score_opus":0.3238786962315818,"score_gpt":0.5008103550717398,"score_spread":0.176931658840158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097396566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838561,0.00024564326,0.0009584795,0.0006081165,0.00013786278,0.000079449834,0.0000014667266,0.000004070128,0.014108835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666905,0.0002132169,0.0000585165,0.000019980756,0.000027637629,0.0000016259581,1.3574189e-7,0.0000023117245,0.0030074976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961673,0.00013381532,0.00036890348,0.0002626565,0.0027970704,0.0002702317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912801,0.007886245,0.00010097846,0.00024963001,0.00036872554,0.00011436829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017504608,0.000058491776,0.00014684048,0.012491338,0.00012147144,0.0007887598,0.000837814,0.000044678054,0.000089317466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01629529,0.000028453174,0.00003400603,0.020383136,0.00007586183,0.00019420455,0.0003766684,0.00011075822,0.00003623842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011083298,0.000029971317,0.19409025,0.0000034243062,0.000003306898,0.0000016036272,0.00011484965,0.00001966065,0.00048362443,0.0018992927,0.00089045474,0.8024525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024366473,0.000061129766,0.95719045,0.0000027629735,6.227004e-7,0.000001117908,0.00014323235,0.014085095,0.015504476,0.0086847935,0.004032136,0.000050485363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013918563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013758783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.802402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014618593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001608805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097434678","doi":"","title":"MINERALOGICAL VARIATIONS WITHIN TWO WIDESPREAD HOLOCENE TEPHRA LAYERS FROM CASCADE RANGE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tephra; Range (aeronautics); Cascade; Holocene","score_opus":0.4727296091812778,"score_gpt":0.5341384190932411,"score_spread":0.06140880991196329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097434678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84201044,0.00013225336,0.103998005,0.0031227604,0.00088547845,0.00021132661,0.000060398776,0.000087509434,0.0494918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742378,0.000017819368,0.018438214,0.001096036,0.00023661049,0.000012757173,0.000011693599,0.000010978216,0.0059380955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99067646,0.00047245363,0.00076338067,0.0009028595,0.0065993327,0.00058550166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853598,0.011421018,0.00021389862,0.0010009304,0.0013806716,0.00062369584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015420534,0.00018265,0.00036787803,0.020082833,0.0002779627,0.002194315,0.002177998,0.00015267785,0.0035922714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054632783,0.00010971624,0.00016442408,0.08961546,0.00016892282,0.0005512951,0.00054214936,0.00030599113,0.0021548073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010444889,0.00068148604,0.45450547,0.0000028139095,0.000084467305,0.00004939157,0.00074161007,0.0012437579,0.014672564,0.06934426,0.32427096,0.13429874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027560703,0.00031406272,0.6727211,0.0000093136605,0.000023983182,0.000013823591,0.00032337086,0.17549933,0.0033426632,0.10168447,0.04267726,0.00063453376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002300601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016943591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2815937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000670849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093582756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097742281","doi":"","title":"ACTION RESEARCH BUILT ON UNCERTAIN FOUNDATIONS: THE INTERNSHIP AND ACTION-","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Promotion (chess); Work (physics); Action research; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.9619219493185587,"score_gpt":0.7435631722513365,"score_spread":0.21835877706722218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097742281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8930244,0.000113599956,0.013248032,0.052426703,0.0008062517,0.00039038708,0.000009019562,0.000038546335,0.039943058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96557176,0.00043129403,0.00011282695,0.00017363315,0.00013609376,0.000025516321,4.1696248e-7,0.000005680798,0.03354278],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907611,0.0007104156,0.0003256928,0.0005572995,0.007203422,0.00044207537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700072,0.026528364,0.0000788834,0.0007803865,0.0023866792,0.00021852179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035782944,0.00008301403,0.00010527824,0.027129842,0.0007065807,0.0024301559,0.0013902449,0.00007456621,0.0021038784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06700014,0.00003112384,0.000053154436,0.07474433,0.00040065165,0.00063872867,0.0004890556,0.00028220596,0.0018968196],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004287674,0.000050115854,0.023229003,0.0000011938603,0.0000069473544,0.000001410969,0.00005771403,0.0000014607684,0.0024922844,0.022821506,0.05709051,0.894205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006604596,0.0005503248,0.26277056,0.000026656944,0.0000025808015,0.0000136813815,0.0037428841,0.0014244402,0.007262389,0.2033697,0.5199805,0.00019582905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031874244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032742883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8940092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018397014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012705929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097755607","doi":"","title":"DU DOCTORAT EN ADMINISTRATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Administration (probate law); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.5556789388399359,"score_gpt":0.6030130234459345,"score_spread":0.04733408460599864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097755607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5912436,0.00002758457,0.118347175,0.0054767593,0.000626081,0.000106278545,0.0000031956665,0.00004482066,0.28412446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867704,0.000013454772,0.001953884,0.0002560797,0.00016637167,0.0000026924324,0.0000014409475,0.000002992056,0.010832697],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367553,0.0002203341,0.00033199342,0.000353219,0.0051712487,0.00024767016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937199,0.0042501627,0.00007275525,0.0004749026,0.001223775,0.0002585337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020021759,0.00006252539,0.000115605726,0.019948583,0.000118879594,0.0017611769,0.0010809498,0.00005900566,0.0028326784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04624868,0.000037346308,0.000060923663,0.08572886,0.000046880425,0.00041889798,0.00022144207,0.0000851354,0.0028589908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016215383,0.00012946212,0.18607134,0.0000015102797,0.000004554524,0.000005082563,0.00007038828,0.000015183238,0.0013475224,0.15479259,0.14871256,0.5088336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022740455,0.00025561094,0.16307466,7.8978115e-7,0.0000011416337,0.0000069358894,0.000113130016,0.018253962,0.0030541413,0.014499651,0.8003946,0.00011800728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020738386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019573044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.651682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028511362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007328116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097874746","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Data collection; Public policy; Ethical issues; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.8051501648126124,"score_gpt":0.6217667223505557,"score_spread":0.18338344246205662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097874746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30509922,0.00023076768,0.00024830125,0.018023761,0.00015893373,0.00019737582,0.00015194411,0.00002164078,0.67586803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644227,0.000050594146,0.0006025202,0.00054401415,0.000025419018,0.000002565257,0.0001118573,0.000003105956,0.0342372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545693,0.00007323185,0.00036197522,0.0005623378,0.0031040541,0.00044145322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630606,0.0008175588,0.00003058627,0.0016390244,0.0007087705,0.00049802556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017668193,0.00004934985,0.00009201141,0.061697777,0.00009651567,0.0023476046,0.0043837284,0.000052074247,0.023325993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020824516,0.000034746437,0.00001523647,0.20901775,0.000029921202,0.0012777995,0.00028451392,0.000113529924,0.0059316903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.022805e-7,0.00001525303,0.10767915,1.7489356e-7,6.269299e-7,0.0000046830382,0.000022234115,0.000007691548,0.000005985771,0.00050639926,0.17230843,0.71944845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104719315,0.000007880361,0.24439968,7.9553405e-7,2.6252556e-7,0.0000027396425,0.000070079164,0.02238133,0.000014946311,0.0018281657,0.7311201,0.00006929004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38499758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5753992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7193792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016689087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049129676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097875678","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public access; Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.7390008015493968,"score_gpt":0.6213030290546234,"score_spread":0.11769777249477342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097875678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5672094,0.0010744672,0.013872837,0.0064496556,0.0006121563,0.00019119095,0.00003848207,0.000077828896,0.41047394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522354,0.00021859865,0.0033886228,0.00039122012,0.000055748213,0.0000054401407,0.0000028202528,0.000004313545,0.020709714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138445,0.00007452247,0.00044170913,0.0005177682,0.007116798,0.0004647788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949049,0.0023045752,0.00009603602,0.00060414633,0.0017088528,0.0003814908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008276176,0.00009950885,0.00019942575,0.028360425,0.0004073735,0.0020085017,0.002180734,0.00007902948,0.007945759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025563572,0.00005519216,0.00009473532,0.1337461,0.0001676432,0.00050032575,0.0007518055,0.00014865777,0.0023926757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023638177,0.0004693155,0.06655162,0.0000049811483,0.000027009557,0.000055627217,0.0005370774,0.000882371,0.0050700703,0.3916405,0.26561984,0.26911795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008390847,0.00029099686,0.051731925,0.000012425432,0.0000037659972,0.000013252592,0.0023414015,0.000445231,0.008968105,0.4792327,0.45579377,0.00032734993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005779282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018339751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4080141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006185192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028381305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099903745","doi":"","title":"Mapping the Social Economy in British Columbia and Alberta: Trends, Patterns, new Directions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); Sustainability; Social economy; Sharing economy; Diversity (politics); Information economy","score_opus":0.3400486148160185,"score_gpt":0.470906453264866,"score_spread":0.13085783844884752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099903745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84788543,0.00021969694,0.0016296004,0.0057459665,0.0002257474,0.00011128193,0.000005494726,0.000014838889,0.14416197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164596,0.00008196197,0.00007747434,0.00036890054,0.00014600111,0.00000713935,0.000001221366,0.000004519699,0.08285314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975346,0.00016311412,0.0003610676,0.00043003168,0.0011713599,0.00033984668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996389,0.0029124906,0.00007601592,0.00022663746,0.00021902069,0.00017687527],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062155216,0.00005359636,0.0001733056,0.009582706,0.00045961142,0.008336022,0.0007617191,0.000060728453,0.0028882707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004474313,0.00005025364,0.00006368176,0.06364702,0.000082288905,0.00034267642,0.0003398349,0.0001563412,0.000064393855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2801008e-7,0.000011631234,0.39461243,4.3064088e-7,0.0000019286115,4.8320703e-7,0.000090708236,3.0162397e-7,0.0000010914468,0.000080883736,0.09638394,0.50881594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019202258,0.0000119165,0.6863059,0.0000020068499,5.7713885e-7,0.000004968413,0.0005107165,0.0010923056,0.0000010230201,0.003093109,0.3087267,0.000058787737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20401803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5729026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5087572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038403705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052954092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100115131","doi":"","title":"Authorship and Contributorship Influence of Authorship Order and Corresponding Author on Perceptions of Authors ’ Contributions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Perception; Medical journal; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.2784536170536177,"score_gpt":0.5483143853796987,"score_spread":0.26986076832608097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100115131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99185455,0.000086472195,0.0031581281,0.002145028,0.00045303715,0.00042547742,0.00039689633,0.00003768162,0.0014427231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946437,0.00002779405,0.0016825447,0.00006058452,0.0000437633,0.000015373053,0.0000067180963,0.000014077467,0.0035054644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919022,0.000715052,0.0013051133,0.0008734903,0.0044467007,0.00075748854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762206,0.0149016585,0.0005794779,0.0009182479,0.0062588374,0.0011211557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036175217,0.0002615312,0.0006688926,0.027393293,0.00045151034,0.0007694917,0.0011892607,0.00050451857,0.0008868748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19081871,0.00018676363,0.00012961453,0.06136635,0.0011884649,0.0005727686,0.00054510037,0.0010336402,0.00004552623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018793945,0.00024727025,0.681838,0.000022057313,0.00003028546,0.000005279446,0.0010907267,0.000058879905,0.080053024,0.22319582,0.00198912,0.011281623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007111955,0.00040913277,0.94401693,0.000029106053,0.000022643595,0.000018589531,0.0006148859,0.0026013444,0.0057589817,0.04390265,0.001663167,0.0002513782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023830458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012880855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26217896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035911118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028814195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100121683","doi":"","title":"PAR","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Runway","score_opus":0.7873547300315965,"score_gpt":0.6522498289432963,"score_spread":0.1351049010883002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100121683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23360895,0.000039941486,0.08112075,0.0020731522,0.0003686544,0.00005086613,0.0000010192867,0.00003289234,0.6827038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979686,0.0000061897026,0.002077807,0.00041297416,0.000059527254,0.000001371366,2.0748737e-7,0.0000022716554,0.01775363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933895,0.00010393697,0.00023923234,0.00030507267,0.0056967665,0.00026547688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484456,0.0032493158,0.00004423043,0.0005529807,0.0010568321,0.00025208216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020853417,0.00004242851,0.000098719676,0.029709863,0.00010373021,0.0013553884,0.0014163593,0.000032794702,0.0038216168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048136443,0.000023235256,0.000056815603,0.14174141,0.000055012704,0.00020656802,0.0002888402,0.00006593552,0.006223625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017678087,0.000029217168,0.13181904,2.8645582e-7,0.0000014401578,7.5776825e-7,0.000011622409,0.0000065878367,0.0004432081,0.031144785,0.18594873,0.65059257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292206,0.0000587089,0.20414977,3.2459022e-7,3.928665e-7,0.0000014456778,0.000029645498,0.0109359445,0.0016560858,0.06452778,0.718443,0.00006773356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020081963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047346593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74607706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001023304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022527724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100224556","doi":"","title":"THE EFFECT OF TENSION AND TIMING OF CONTRACTION ON OXYGEN SATURATION IN THE TRAPEZIUS MASTERS OF SCIENCE DEGREE THESIS AS PART OF THE MASTERS PROGRAMME IN KINANTHROPOLOGIE BY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Degree (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3932977942234205,"score_gpt":0.5029853979905599,"score_spread":0.10968760376713937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100224556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963355,0.00013451301,0.00016411574,0.0013652034,0.00015454137,0.00053081673,0.000002958252,0.000001638996,0.0013107212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997619,0.000101834594,0.000060505874,0.000023529297,0.0000040281393,0.0000075021426,1.8988104e-7,0.000002453401,0.000038097605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943186,0.0007534558,0.0006459907,0.00030113317,0.003685387,0.00029541433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98650527,0.011950105,0.00048684565,0.00050652574,0.00050890434,0.000042322572],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031832144,0.00009022584,0.0002592257,0.005619038,0.00015567864,0.00016462585,0.001227275,0.000060368187,0.000011566043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026178809,0.000032073218,0.000070069684,0.037459802,0.0019181188,0.00023482357,0.00016888983,0.0001399503,8.470393e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024222507,0.00009980033,0.12764129,0.000015906531,0.000005134107,3.0569916e-7,0.00039423243,0.000046348647,0.07205477,0.00048242699,0.00022525825,0.7987923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084183976,0.0019896417,0.72789073,0.000069996895,0.000009575374,0.0000030676124,0.0053720875,0.012798728,0.24991232,0.0006823987,0.00035080448,0.00007882596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006272426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018429424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79871345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035522142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006326025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100281307","doi":"","title":"Reprints and permission:","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citation; Social impact; Citation analysis; Bibliometrics; Hard and soft science","score_opus":0.8004582169309212,"score_gpt":0.6740130649567473,"score_spread":0.12644515197417394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100281307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7160111,0.00028187464,0.002314579,0.007412081,0.00010867329,0.000070525,7.816011e-7,0.000025209414,0.2737752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753894,0.00008115679,0.0016594401,0.00049129507,0.0000254216,3.5486553e-7,1.13507404e-7,0.0000010898639,0.022351695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954246,0.00004630534,0.00022983852,0.00040394012,0.0036837733,0.00021150228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977523,0.00080740644,0.00003799257,0.00043397964,0.000646361,0.00032193007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008964559,0.000047571888,0.00009943792,0.01820372,0.00011529495,0.0012378538,0.0006801765,0.000038423557,0.0022751403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01816359,0.000026526599,0.00003309058,0.07269418,0.00004125933,0.000250747,0.0002140977,0.00007846788,0.00051250577],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032933026,0.000026595759,0.03262893,1.4572191e-7,5.652195e-7,0.000006883517,0.00002463411,5.471578e-7,0.0008717524,0.005120691,0.024955288,0.93636066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014604813,0.00008405853,0.84741026,0.0000010936558,4.3968103e-7,0.000014095184,0.00010701435,0.0017811458,0.0010090803,0.06181664,0.08756069,0.00006942116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062928093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.323952e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000112206235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029353312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100358279","doi":"","title":"AU DOCTORAT EN SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVES PAR","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diffuser (optics); Plenum space; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.710578843908979,"score_gpt":0.6711142444029519,"score_spread":0.0394645995060271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100358279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63260597,0.0001691607,0.0031748337,0.006783695,0.00030953882,0.00012908252,0.000006184056,0.000040992993,0.35678053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98920196,0.000035357632,0.0034121221,0.00044350018,0.000110497596,0.0000018409244,5.3616174e-7,0.0000020618777,0.006792103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899184,0.000272185,0.00049446075,0.0006965656,0.007989264,0.00062908605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938512,0.00420542,0.00011821396,0.00047960837,0.00091882364,0.00042676405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023594255,0.00012485926,0.00021670535,0.029316252,0.00052452856,0.0034131897,0.0028414743,0.000074514486,0.0018220049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025704373,0.00007006962,0.00010849312,0.17197022,0.00039457527,0.00095592334,0.00022172072,0.00014761595,0.0010270807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027128675,0.00043613487,0.25844982,0.0000015319997,0.000009385319,0.000039167408,0.0008482034,0.000038427675,0.004975939,0.12920341,0.07085417,0.5351167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032409173,0.0014701182,0.82357,0.000004421334,0.000002413942,0.000014539953,0.0020194224,0.002028581,0.011753509,0.08491469,0.07357566,0.00032253587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040606075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022845448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56512016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006710348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005632309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100643059","doi":"","title":"Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Public policy; Research ethics; Data collection","score_opus":0.8558532632662189,"score_gpt":0.6372503094320134,"score_spread":0.21860295383420547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100643059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33809298,0.00040340572,0.003852347,0.04134649,0.00049432815,0.00031105144,0.0001227435,0.00003443134,0.61534226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98554385,0.000059578095,0.00061572343,0.00049173395,0.00003076323,0.0000025300578,0.00009586235,0.0000030739359,0.013156871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952684,0.0000688324,0.00036518535,0.00055963447,0.0032661762,0.00047175016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955335,0.0010141217,0.00005109222,0.0016602442,0.0012106512,0.00053035724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021068264,0.00004997144,0.00009370322,0.09064419,0.00009677747,0.0023838584,0.0044725523,0.00005309989,0.0029798655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052017614,0.000035144985,0.000015113652,0.25940397,0.000028058847,0.001340736,0.0006651871,0.00011567184,0.0021088992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.01463e-7,0.000017450864,0.59585667,1.620853e-7,7.1976393e-7,0.0000138998985,0.000018840266,0.0000037227537,0.000014780667,0.0012824921,0.15753935,0.24525103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010282407,0.000007504949,0.35613865,7.343709e-7,2.5239032e-7,0.0000069466923,0.00014971924,0.020910842,0.000010887081,0.0022580517,0.6203483,0.00006533332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38842565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7320599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6474509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021093791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051759975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100697000","doi":"","title":"payment system: Evidence from Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Institution; Personally identifiable information; Order (exchange); Access to information","score_opus":0.7625437398026618,"score_gpt":0.5762092044463163,"score_spread":0.18633453535634548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100697000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.919182,0.00041984033,0.0385266,0.0027205476,0.0009740176,0.00018095366,0.000016630896,0.000053032916,0.037926387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319579,0.00003271829,0.0012424099,0.00007147441,0.000064900436,0.000005894166,2.365475e-7,0.0000039474926,0.06662049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887823,0.00015086019,0.00054061937,0.0007171106,0.009377231,0.00043186688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830872,0.013847395,0.00012922865,0.0010328431,0.0014805353,0.00042281247],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012612588,0.000100900994,0.00020997826,0.01769048,0.00010947063,0.0014729038,0.0023346972,0.00006465521,0.013753871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024957184,0.000041030235,0.00010884236,0.05548668,0.000075251046,0.0008036879,0.0006942058,0.00007884082,0.010253679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017203232,0.000034730907,0.7955897,0.0000010026992,0.00000992,0.000017877237,0.00011306897,7.719792e-7,0.005086987,0.0013711487,0.059598684,0.1381589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035473454,0.00011285825,0.9092229,0.00008206505,0.000003939637,0.0000030550611,0.00025549423,0.00022999058,0.0060769618,0.0032474159,0.080233924,0.00017664823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06837672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023347626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13798225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066481804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031225785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100776278","doi":"","title":"Conclusions References Tables Figures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public access; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Private sector","score_opus":0.6626260073294132,"score_gpt":0.5997115490804761,"score_spread":0.06291445824893716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100776278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34337476,0.0009897999,0.0045231157,0.0019809185,0.00036362326,0.00011798094,0.000036036297,0.000054592376,0.64855915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938558,0.0000686094,0.0016363167,0.00015220951,0.000100182806,0.0000049567348,0.0000061195765,0.000003943829,0.10417188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141717,0.00011784422,0.0005019712,0.0005035369,0.0069957334,0.00046376415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934828,0.0039068316,0.00010896678,0.0005507028,0.0017468154,0.00020385961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008424325,0.00009823097,0.00019734338,0.028765814,0.00039155243,0.0023169438,0.0018914535,0.00007676979,0.012546184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011922285,0.00005476782,0.00009301481,0.1270252,0.00015292208,0.00041667704,0.00063715037,0.00012100676,0.0016652625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043977134,0.00010227061,0.10415296,0.0000010462309,0.0000032236114,0.0000086484815,0.00001772139,0.000056262656,0.001508306,0.074566536,0.7702161,0.049362533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022329202,0.00008100836,0.12353061,0.0000032081123,0.0000020259833,0.0000042800652,0.00046462336,0.0021486965,0.0029327325,0.15261318,0.71781874,0.00017761908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003707671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.550481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031748248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012496173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100837529","doi":"","title":"STRATIGRAPHY IN THREE QUARRIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stratigraphy; Promotion (chess); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.8668434790401112,"score_gpt":0.6381668803534625,"score_spread":0.2286765986866487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100837529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75782895,0.000393126,0.0066412794,0.0010318354,0.0002966155,0.00010936256,0.0000035472967,0.00002058746,0.2336747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670035,0.000009222116,0.0017624964,0.000083558116,0.000030991727,0.0000040504356,3.573862e-7,0.0000024723884,0.0014065265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918892,0.00008518498,0.0003961207,0.00035933073,0.006929419,0.00034073734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996414,0.0013410245,0.000054548273,0.00047144727,0.0013236728,0.00039531998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018885963,0.000067471636,0.00015134751,0.059986003,0.000038877806,0.00152623,0.0014068023,0.000053802418,0.0005724664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021300964,0.000040270494,0.00005718872,0.23617752,0.00010216159,0.0005432631,0.00021766052,0.00012351171,0.0006239874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084863605,0.000051151223,0.8665244,3.3493447e-7,0.0000015341367,0.0000066208727,0.00009470771,0.000024816056,0.000034365345,0.02977132,0.035112727,0.06836952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004750602,0.0001521274,0.538901,0.0000013867609,4.19615e-7,0.0000011736662,0.0019024884,0.003623608,0.00035858754,0.43118602,0.023278186,0.000119961995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006173949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041041533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4014147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029938714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019488238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101185074","doi":"","title":"Based on a Set of Coplanar Straight Lines","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Set theory; Sequence (biology); Intersection (aeronautics); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.7926643600828706,"score_gpt":0.6066663948559656,"score_spread":0.18599796522690493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101185074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73896724,0.00012259785,0.010539559,0.002760776,0.00036142793,0.00021262748,0.00011221911,0.000034513792,0.24688905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879301,0.00002898821,0.001662805,0.0003265869,0.000040848554,0.000001842802,0.0000029782975,0.000003827687,0.01000203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164796,0.000088704546,0.0004282518,0.0003533984,0.007214394,0.00026727634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936267,0.003932927,0.000111497255,0.00057076925,0.0015374499,0.00022063998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005725907,0.00007887134,0.0002082244,0.041371632,0.000110356625,0.00017164576,0.0012280914,0.000060212715,0.005085265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013455553,0.000044741657,0.00010587677,0.12890267,0.00015585341,0.00013510248,0.00010246454,0.000098543445,0.00046770257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008448304,0.00033026157,0.24081616,0.000005931334,0.000009860906,0.00007945829,0.00009147985,0.0009295067,0.0014851595,0.0017412561,0.70604116,0.048385262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018914192,0.001488083,0.49052957,0.000015547581,0.0000044475105,0.000024304614,0.00025214345,0.17120968,0.033192527,0.0027438228,0.29823244,0.00041602875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035056895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008172827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40780875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001756363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001841674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039363","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0134","title":"Research Persistence: A Comparative Study of Core and Peripheral Journal Authors in Five Medical Research Topics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Core (optical fiber); Publication; Medical research; Scientific publishing; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Original research","score_opus":0.8119967163500094,"score_gpt":0.654563852756843,"score_spread":0.15743286359316633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706863,0.0035966854,0.000100613244,0.017931616,0.000727195,0.00027018494,0.0000030376902,0.0000018284876,0.0066824937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995714,0.00034204056,0.0005867796,0.0000651233,0.0002562222,0.000002985122,2.0016485e-7,0.0000057938864,0.0030268633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94131804,0.00670047,0.0029722068,0.00068113935,0.047179017,0.0011491228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8936763,0.023244089,0.0011347285,0.0007912226,0.079507746,0.0016459537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34183863,0.00014210526,0.0007618821,0.102906086,0.0009125793,0.061636783,0.0062667946,0.00037800116,0.00036281918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40150797,0.00009495943,0.0001551258,0.14430156,0.0006969302,0.02667822,0.002302063,0.011607536,0.0000030255885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033743723,0.0012232228,0.8385067,0.00001822838,0.00009954311,0.0004281186,0.021348752,0.000086689695,0.00012604981,0.0023546834,0.073616214,0.061854366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032840297,0.002518901,0.57569855,0.00036674272,0.000009660832,0.00021699812,0.37906048,0.0032127867,0.000030304027,0.022020908,0.013445868,0.0001347966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039594472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003131515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35771173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006752396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032270763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039980","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0014","title":"Study on the Funding Characteristics of English-language Sci-Tech Journals Published in China: Implementation of the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan-II","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; China; Action plan; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Citation; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.3569589056399203,"score_gpt":0.5259805209338575,"score_spread":0.16902161529393722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98491174,0.0005752018,0.00067522604,0.00819069,0.0038618294,0.0005359118,0.00003057845,0.00000656102,0.0012122581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987601,0.00023024737,0.00015414918,0.000118782504,0.00052419206,0.000004926108,9.555185e-7,0.000015174842,0.00019144495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97692543,0.0020466137,0.0040249242,0.0005061068,0.01574272,0.0007542088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756377,0.003861807,0.0057799267,0.0009659411,0.01342721,0.0003274214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14846939,0.00026852396,0.0007864178,0.049448345,0.0012373668,0.057834566,0.00789932,0.00023736255,0.00038862927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24726947,0.000140994,0.0004205925,0.09081692,0.00016766104,0.04116985,0.0015663625,0.005229678,0.0000013862231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014169664,0.0006740823,0.91284186,0.000017357565,0.000114489914,0.000031724416,0.011047867,0.000059600065,0.010006522,0.00033391803,0.007884063,0.05684683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014100502,0.00054596324,0.93115747,0.00033689517,0.000034075067,0.000045066783,0.058863018,0.00007294091,0.0041317088,0.0025574223,0.00072019745,0.00012522071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022872767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006382882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09880008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006179604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013369075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106110067","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17654000","title":"Regaining control of research assessment. How for-profit companies control scholarly metrics | Reprendre le contrôle de l'évaluation de la recherche. Comment les entreprises à but lucrative contrôlent les indicateurs scientifiques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Presentation (obstetrics); Documentation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.675596831169209,"score_gpt":0.549472064768764,"score_spread":0.126124766400445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106110067","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1909949,0.0026398245,0.75131637,0.020761373,0.00019069713,0.0030137666,0.00073798525,0.00034422675,0.030000862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992064,0.00044658233,0.0046616956,0.00021767021,0.00006443786,0.0000038436874,0.00014449903,0.0002258032,0.0021714454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765794,0.015086217,0.0009651002,0.001175353,0.0051235985,0.0010703279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526772,0.024757363,0.0007861426,0.001288074,0.019999381,0.0004918357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14140642,0.0002532708,0.00059843884,0.02037042,0.0044391565,0.011889377,0.003964787,0.00035403116,0.00056804845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2564075,0.00022941016,0.0002005666,0.03718683,0.0014595925,0.0011182536,0.0017341111,0.0014471083,0.000067326735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009599137,0.00081678695,0.02763839,0.00025551065,0.00049110554,0.000020433927,0.0039504454,0.0007642856,0.06846113,0.10239023,0.23312211,0.5611297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015859751,0.0018410835,0.06900686,0.0005224137,0.00017077512,0.00004050684,0.050597366,0.08468336,0.041027162,0.059282433,0.6760715,0.00089677895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032078766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024400229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80106914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012586943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037236954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106124311","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17653999","title":"Regaining control of research assessment. How for-profit companies control scholarly metrics | Reprendre le contrôle de l'évaluation de la recherche. Comment les entreprises à but lucrative contrôlent les indicateurs scientifiques","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Presentation (obstetrics); Documentation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.675596831169209,"score_gpt":0.549472064768764,"score_spread":0.126124766400445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106124311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1909949,0.0026398245,0.75131637,0.020761373,0.00019069713,0.0030137666,0.00073798525,0.00034422675,0.030000862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992064,0.00044658233,0.0046616956,0.00021767021,0.00006443786,0.0000038436874,0.00014449903,0.0002258032,0.0021714454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765794,0.015086217,0.0009651002,0.001175353,0.0051235985,0.0010703279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526772,0.024757363,0.0007861426,0.001288074,0.019999381,0.0004918357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14140642,0.0002532708,0.00059843884,0.02037042,0.0044391565,0.011889377,0.003964787,0.00035403116,0.00056804845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2564075,0.00022941016,0.0002005666,0.03718683,0.0014595925,0.0011182536,0.0017341111,0.0014471083,0.000067326735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009599137,0.00081678695,0.02763839,0.00025551065,0.00049110554,0.000020433927,0.0039504454,0.0007642856,0.06846113,0.10239023,0.23312211,0.5611297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015859751,0.0018410835,0.06900686,0.0005224137,0.00017077512,0.00004050684,0.050597366,0.08468336,0.041027162,0.059282433,0.6760715,0.00089677895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032078766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024400229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80106914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012586943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037236954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106756452","doi":"10.14429/djlit.20871","title":"DESIDOC Journal of Library Information Technology","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Productivity; Thematic map; Digital library; Bibliometrics; Information technology; Distribution (mathematics)","score_opus":0.10150083233291296,"score_gpt":0.4270096613435049,"score_spread":0.3255088290105919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106756452","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34013715,0.041642834,0.3747963,0.17459916,0.014813156,0.0023079102,0.00036002445,0.00057482516,0.05076864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89291114,0.0304869,0.070759155,0.0036901543,0.00040585827,0.000015838266,0.000036166482,0.000051092888,0.0016437104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98013693,0.0005141512,0.010725995,0.0003513841,0.006837834,0.0014337058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97611266,0.0025590642,0.011485646,0.0013614293,0.007832771,0.000648428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011596144,0.00066910323,0.0019005886,0.36559224,0.000639525,0.0060203527,0.0109976595,0.0020366535,0.0019541308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026340589,0.000527783,0.00085430895,0.27323705,0.0014659639,0.08225307,0.0030494079,0.0037825012,0.000500683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006302842,0.00028329846,0.036710393,0.0001952193,0.00035815602,0.000093180824,0.00046562465,0.0003159795,0.00017369133,0.06739705,0.18509895,0.7082782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004060161,0.003069294,0.0058498606,0.0009260853,0.00013221348,0.0022450895,0.008197914,0.002273058,0.038043775,0.16896473,0.7656257,0.00061211875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024229412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.9327398e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70766604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002724452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006888901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108440524","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796394","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108440524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109332,0.005014003,0.024752196,0.010694938,0.0069997218,0.00330434,0.022589339,0.0005516528,0.4151606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455273,0.0012345995,0.0011688214,0.00006548815,0.00017862048,7.305924e-8,0.00044452187,0.00039759497,0.001957562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331493,0.0014717841,0.0016342291,0.0017960452,0.010904232,0.00087877404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867332,0.0018794313,0.0006775564,0.001389163,0.008551219,0.0007694464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012859012,0.00041247142,0.00076361845,0.014253539,0.0032087052,0.013321943,0.007847727,0.0003925705,0.027497195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09922871,0.00039471948,0.00022242291,0.027615892,0.001465129,0.0009643356,0.026296569,0.0017130944,0.0010748433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038767967,0.000620538,0.0053253486,0.00042287714,0.00030112645,0.000019664716,0.0017558996,0.00022038555,0.002946544,0.015893012,0.055445615,0.9166613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248917,0.0005654424,0.038619887,0.00028388647,0.000066437125,0.000060326533,0.0021439348,0.019963032,0.002249866,0.0036541848,0.9308097,0.0005584118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046883335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.642995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065029185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041104082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108440630","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796405","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108440630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109332,0.005014003,0.024752196,0.010694938,0.0069997218,0.00330434,0.022589339,0.0005516528,0.4151606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455273,0.0012345995,0.0011688214,0.00006548815,0.00017862048,7.305924e-8,0.00044452187,0.00039759497,0.001957562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331493,0.0014717841,0.0016342291,0.0017960452,0.010904232,0.00087877404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867332,0.0018794313,0.0006775564,0.001389163,0.008551219,0.0007694464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012859012,0.00041247142,0.00076361845,0.014253539,0.0032087052,0.013321943,0.007847727,0.0003925705,0.027497195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09922871,0.00039471948,0.00022242291,0.027615892,0.001465129,0.0009643356,0.026296569,0.0017130944,0.0010748433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038767967,0.000620538,0.0053253486,0.00042287714,0.00030112645,0.000019664716,0.0017558996,0.00022038555,0.002946544,0.015893012,0.055445615,0.9166613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248917,0.0005654424,0.038619887,0.00028388647,0.000066437125,0.000060326533,0.0021439348,0.019963032,0.002249866,0.0036541848,0.9308097,0.0005584118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046883335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.642995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065029185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041104082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108441974","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796460","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108441974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109332,0.005014003,0.024752196,0.010694938,0.0069997218,0.00330434,0.022589339,0.0005516528,0.4151606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455273,0.0012345995,0.0011688214,0.00006548815,0.00017862048,7.305924e-8,0.00044452187,0.00039759497,0.001957562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331493,0.0014717841,0.0016342291,0.0017960452,0.010904232,0.00087877404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867332,0.0018794313,0.0006775564,0.001389163,0.008551219,0.0007694464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012859012,0.00041247142,0.00076361845,0.014253539,0.0032087052,0.013321943,0.007847727,0.0003925705,0.027497195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09922871,0.00039471948,0.00022242291,0.027615892,0.001465129,0.0009643356,0.026296569,0.0017130944,0.0010748433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038767967,0.000620538,0.0053253486,0.00042287714,0.00030112645,0.000019664716,0.0017558996,0.00022038555,0.002946544,0.015893012,0.055445615,0.9166613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248917,0.0005654424,0.038619887,0.00028388647,0.000066437125,0.000060326533,0.0021439348,0.019963032,0.002249866,0.0036541848,0.9308097,0.0005584118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046883335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.642995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065029185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041104082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108470610","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17796449","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108470610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109332,0.005014003,0.024752196,0.010694938,0.0069997218,0.00330434,0.022589339,0.0005516528,0.4151606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455273,0.0012345995,0.0011688214,0.00006548815,0.00017862048,7.305924e-8,0.00044452187,0.00039759497,0.001957562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331493,0.0014717841,0.0016342291,0.0017960452,0.010904232,0.00087877404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867332,0.0018794313,0.0006775564,0.001389163,0.008551219,0.0007694464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012859012,0.00041247142,0.00076361845,0.014253539,0.0032087052,0.013321943,0.007847727,0.0003925705,0.027497195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09922871,0.00039471948,0.00022242291,0.027615892,0.001465129,0.0009643356,0.026296569,0.0017130944,0.0010748433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038767967,0.000620538,0.0053253486,0.00042287714,0.00030112645,0.000019664716,0.0017558996,0.00022038555,0.002946544,0.015893012,0.055445615,0.9166613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248917,0.0005654424,0.038619887,0.00028388647,0.000066437125,0.000060326533,0.0021439348,0.019963032,0.002249866,0.0036541848,0.9308097,0.0005584118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046883335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.642995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065029185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041104082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108599753","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17809251","title":"International Comparison of Government-Critical Scholarship and Structural Causes","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Disadvantaged; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Accountability; Politics; Work (physics); Higher education","score_opus":0.39762843011962457,"score_gpt":0.5084779578812929,"score_spread":0.11084952776166834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108599753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109332,0.005014003,0.024752196,0.010694938,0.0069997218,0.00330434,0.022589339,0.0005516528,0.4151606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455273,0.0012345995,0.0011688214,0.00006548815,0.00017862048,7.305924e-8,0.00044452187,0.00039759497,0.001957562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331493,0.0014717841,0.0016342291,0.0017960452,0.010904232,0.00087877404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867332,0.0018794313,0.0006775564,0.001389163,0.008551219,0.0007694464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012859012,0.00041247142,0.00076361845,0.014253539,0.0032087052,0.013321943,0.007847727,0.0003925705,0.027497195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09922871,0.00039471948,0.00022242291,0.027615892,0.001465129,0.0009643356,0.026296569,0.0017130944,0.0010748433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038767967,0.000620538,0.0053253486,0.00042287714,0.00030112645,0.000019664716,0.0017558996,0.00022038555,0.002946544,0.015893012,0.055445615,0.9166613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248917,0.0005654424,0.038619887,0.00028388647,0.000066437125,0.000060326533,0.0021439348,0.019963032,0.002249866,0.0036541848,0.9308097,0.0005584118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046883335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.642995e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065029185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041104082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111061362","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871939","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111061362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83134776,0.0027941775,0.03227561,0.0036408384,0.00078047265,0.0014609694,0.002155406,0.000381643,0.1251631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267983,0.0013533836,0.00024046979,0.00023502507,0.00016268896,1.4647487e-7,0.0004727665,0.0006783541,0.004177314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865522,0.0030747368,0.0012216743,0.0014907551,0.005788556,0.0018721143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98538935,0.0018952909,0.0004493554,0.0015846228,0.009483094,0.0011983052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025660267,0.00045498897,0.0005422148,0.020546816,0.0072922,0.011939038,0.006129132,0.00025495916,0.023817936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074862525,0.00041184473,0.00031717445,0.08414406,0.0009547213,0.0015021955,0.0042949645,0.0010402389,0.0015961352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024910603,0.000696334,0.0032759798,0.0001814168,0.00021195455,0.00006510885,0.0015371718,0.0017163608,0.004943148,0.0039507262,0.338535,0.6446377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014223661,0.0008775861,0.17414662,0.00014230254,0.000056566834,0.000088580025,0.0028184662,0.010610926,0.0010534644,0.0017071675,0.80650043,0.0005755255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17442586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010572453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64406216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014979813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111357557","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871908","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111357557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83134776,0.0027941775,0.03227561,0.0036408384,0.00078047265,0.0014609694,0.002155406,0.000381643,0.1251631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267983,0.0013533836,0.00024046979,0.00023502507,0.00016268896,1.4647487e-7,0.0004727665,0.0006783541,0.004177314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865522,0.0030747368,0.0012216743,0.0014907551,0.005788556,0.0018721143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98538935,0.0018952909,0.0004493554,0.0015846228,0.009483094,0.0011983052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025660267,0.00045498897,0.0005422148,0.020546816,0.0072922,0.011939038,0.006129132,0.00025495916,0.023817936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074862525,0.00041184473,0.00031717445,0.08414406,0.0009547213,0.0015021955,0.0042949645,0.0010402389,0.0015961352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024910603,0.000696334,0.0032759798,0.0001814168,0.00021195455,0.00006510885,0.0015371718,0.0017163608,0.004943148,0.0039507262,0.338535,0.6446377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014223661,0.0008775861,0.17414662,0.00014230254,0.000056566834,0.000088580025,0.0028184662,0.010610926,0.0010534644,0.0017071675,0.80650043,0.0005755255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17442586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010572453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64406216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014979813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111416491","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17871907","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Impact et valeur des PID","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"PID controller; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Control (management)","score_opus":0.3454641703513478,"score_gpt":0.45452900616695463,"score_spread":0.10906483581560683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111416491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83134776,0.0027941775,0.03227561,0.0036408384,0.00078047265,0.0014609694,0.002155406,0.000381643,0.1251631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267983,0.0013533836,0.00024046979,0.00023502507,0.00016268896,1.4647487e-7,0.0004727665,0.0006783541,0.004177314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865522,0.0030747368,0.0012216743,0.0014907551,0.005788556,0.0018721143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98538935,0.0018952909,0.0004493554,0.0015846228,0.009483094,0.0011983052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025660267,0.00045498897,0.0005422148,0.020546816,0.0072922,0.011939038,0.006129132,0.00025495916,0.023817936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074862525,0.00041184473,0.00031717445,0.08414406,0.0009547213,0.0015021955,0.0042949645,0.0010402389,0.0015961352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024910603,0.000696334,0.0032759798,0.0001814168,0.00021195455,0.00006510885,0.0015371718,0.0017163608,0.004943148,0.0039507262,0.338535,0.6446377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014223661,0.0008775861,0.17414662,0.00014230254,0.000056566834,0.000088580025,0.0028184662,0.010610926,0.0010534644,0.0017071675,0.80650043,0.0005755255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17442586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010572453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64406216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014979813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112252642","doi":"","title":"MSI Working Paper","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Elite; Quality (philosophy); Sample (material); Work (physics); Perception","score_opus":0.7282127685657008,"score_gpt":0.5810132421200462,"score_spread":0.1471995264456546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112252642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48083013,0.08119573,0.004691346,0.012540347,0.04139435,0.0014914514,0.00009990387,0.0001981817,0.37755856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95222694,0.0019230259,0.0014703183,0.001634967,0.0031499083,0.000026774136,0.0000053921453,0.000067031346,0.039495632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733344,0.0010095317,0.0020198668,0.001654923,0.017990265,0.0039910288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826941,0.008965268,0.00073333964,0.0025634205,0.0021525284,0.002891368],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04657864,0.00065729464,0.0009917356,0.06446277,0.0011718499,0.0072357347,0.0055224444,0.0007284288,0.030357225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037747137,0.0005153285,0.0007450253,0.28908592,0.00059121643,0.004325968,0.0030671458,0.0014083994,0.021498509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007653652,0.00083882833,0.16443774,0.0000190179,0.00008822256,0.000036499543,0.0013443852,0.000032967742,0.00059496344,0.0072165,0.082450055,0.7428643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008819366,0.00019759935,0.08900147,0.00007083382,0.000038811384,0.000030846928,0.0010558835,0.0015331162,0.0005607373,0.0029843522,0.90291804,0.00072639587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019756064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82046795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050003256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005724381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115570790","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17940151","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Actions des parties prenantes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3795851398800293,"score_gpt":0.42673995916209534,"score_spread":0.04715481928206605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115570790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7446242,0.009515352,0.04227909,0.016776841,0.0019948238,0.0013321165,0.0017551926,0.00052421255,0.18119818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734698,0.0018173737,0.00034063894,0.00011211396,0.00019950834,2.2179081e-7,0.00021804842,0.0003608656,0.023481453],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930553,0.0013765151,0.0006987536,0.00081556285,0.002851266,0.0012026175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914348,0.0012364708,0.00021793618,0.0008094642,0.0057226936,0.00057862565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009114787,0.00024220065,0.0002924242,0.009868743,0.0067458223,0.006039516,0.002919494,0.00017193578,0.013969364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04358323,0.00023109617,0.00011922582,0.047141552,0.0010605406,0.0010647753,0.00194242,0.0005696022,0.0011537388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005792628,0.0003496656,0.0009861833,0.0001504849,0.00007478071,0.000018674029,0.0010961059,0.00065217086,0.0020857402,0.012252167,0.27553537,0.70674074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043780913,0.00023335872,0.028630981,0.000116379866,0.000028691975,0.000040328785,0.0039814417,0.0048715454,0.0017459695,0.002261268,0.95742077,0.00023148657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15249574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021595929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70650923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025707106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065627735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115598168","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17940150","title":"Stratégie sur les PID au Canada: Trousse de mobilisation - Actions des parties prenantes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Context (archaeology); Data collection; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.3795851398800293,"score_gpt":0.42673995916209534,"score_spread":0.04715481928206605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115598168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7446242,0.009515352,0.04227909,0.016776841,0.0019948238,0.0013321165,0.0017551926,0.00052421255,0.18119818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734698,0.0018173737,0.00034063894,0.00011211396,0.00019950834,2.2179081e-7,0.00021804842,0.0003608656,0.023481453],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930553,0.0013765151,0.0006987536,0.00081556285,0.002851266,0.0012026175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914348,0.0012364708,0.00021793618,0.0008094642,0.0057226936,0.00057862565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009114787,0.00024220065,0.0002924242,0.009868743,0.0067458223,0.006039516,0.002919494,0.00017193578,0.013969364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04358323,0.00023109617,0.00011922582,0.047141552,0.0010605406,0.0010647753,0.00194242,0.0005696022,0.0011537388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005792628,0.0003496656,0.0009861833,0.0001504849,0.00007478071,0.000018674029,0.0010961059,0.00065217086,0.0020857402,0.012252167,0.27553537,0.70674074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043780913,0.00023335872,0.028630981,0.000116379866,0.000028691975,0.000040328785,0.0039814417,0.0048715454,0.0017459695,0.002261268,0.95742077,0.00023148657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15249574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021595929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70650923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025707106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065627735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117119183","doi":"10.4103/ijors.ijors_18_25","title":"Bibliometric Analysis of Foreign Orthopaedics Research in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2007–2024): Trends, Impact and International Collaboration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Citation analysis; Thematic analysis; Citation impact; Joint (building)","score_opus":0.3336678912474889,"score_gpt":0.5643112494340826,"score_spread":0.2306433581865937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117119183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805856,0.0058866167,0.0017841944,0.003870276,0.005332198,0.0001245368,0.00013976086,0.0000028876962,0.0022739389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914983,0.007127854,0.00027399018,0.00017176518,0.00056296366,0.0000033202064,0.00001773012,0.00001112592,0.00033297707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97468984,0.001631593,0.0041748444,0.00041971676,0.018530587,0.0005533952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368716,0.028600043,0.0033551955,0.00052602054,0.03026775,0.000379431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10801416,0.00023694344,0.0010370295,0.78765637,0.0001369641,0.0017137337,0.0037572798,0.0002225369,0.0007867301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07946833,0.00014635929,0.0013408118,0.7394162,0.00050459924,0.0015760135,0.0004977632,0.0012059498,0.0000032628698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003704917,0.00031388848,0.7137172,0.000006287025,0.0011281068,0.0005601814,0.0002855447,0.00045259274,0.000028263777,0.00027654838,0.025461331,0.25739956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011389774,0.00028080784,0.97505665,0.00014348258,0.00017118908,0.00037176922,0.0036069339,0.0016111057,0.000032068005,0.003335061,0.014114034,0.00013790822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000974196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091586124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26133946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044965904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026466139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117252042","doi":"10.17742/image29731","title":"Un/Sustainable Peer Review and Generative AI: Ethical Gaps, Editorial Acceleration, and the Whitewashing of Technological Solutionism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Imaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Generative grammar; Quality (philosophy); Ethical issues; Peer review","score_opus":0.2452509263862717,"score_gpt":0.6085155508647013,"score_spread":0.36326462447842967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117252042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0150824655,0.1319714,0.005947625,0.84050566,0.002033625,0.0004922308,0.000021311398,0.0000129235705,0.003932745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506926,0.03453341,0.0056918645,0.002285415,0.0009899848,0.000027609201,0.0000020331306,0.00000602613,0.005771042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944113,0.00042545295,0.00089444284,0.0002756385,0.0037128795,0.0002802748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8207158,0.0046376158,0.0007242147,0.00026575246,0.17355639,0.000100238336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026816987,0.00014575044,0.00057908206,0.004064698,0.0013283201,0.0075123482,0.00078396895,0.000108815846,0.000017326203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31530884,0.00006760806,0.00013328648,0.02001792,0.009360639,0.0050081634,0.0008495263,0.0009345637,0.0000014282576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055564004,0.000069526875,0.002750039,0.00012948574,0.00022928299,0.000011548863,0.0007477632,0.000011188444,0.0012577808,0.32146192,0.66384727,0.009428621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003302358,0.00016255969,0.01625161,0.00020434856,0.00023916869,0.00010362313,0.0065412433,0.00023313842,0.0027181364,0.43651393,0.53349596,0.00023392931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009061799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017566767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9356102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009666871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018676648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117300270","doi":"10.1111/mec.70210","title":"Editorial 2026","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Editorial board; Publishing; Competition (biology); Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Evolutionary ecology","score_opus":0.25370108469908864,"score_gpt":0.570154692688483,"score_spread":0.3164536079893943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117300270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44154313,0.0007788365,0.03360506,0.010144535,0.32536182,0.00046202124,0.000015531006,0.00006878549,0.18802029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98299074,0.000025292982,0.00061368675,0.0012429091,0.004213598,0.000021921844,0.0000025887657,0.000006224633,0.010883037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954946,0.00025404993,0.00037601477,0.0005221052,0.0029067178,0.0004465227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995587,0.002014023,0.000071235765,0.0006061448,0.0015772845,0.00014434324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008185024,0.000082790146,0.00021166661,0.02940733,0.00013672092,0.0006408628,0.0017211098,0.000194658,0.00089320814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038110908,0.00006328912,0.00011558628,0.09488995,0.00011982178,0.000099423916,0.00075641816,0.00021844926,0.0011239011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011418864,0.000060248145,0.028099239,9.730683e-7,0.000013310218,0.000022414572,0.000006170528,0.000027782293,0.003046515,0.011737244,0.9353618,0.021612898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037628828,0.00008372671,0.034726676,8.3493416e-7,0.0000037578707,0.0000012361177,0.000024231571,0.0004585579,0.0021014109,0.059178364,0.902969,0.000075930366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002139037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001951772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54144764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079624326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002966122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117607505","doi":"10.5530/irc.2.3.38","title":"Scientometric Analysis of the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation Reflected as Publish or Perish","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Information Research Communications","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Publication; Publishing; Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Citation","score_opus":0.80204099112816,"score_gpt":0.7107137527623233,"score_spread":0.09132723836583667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117607505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762777,0.0072646826,0.010235565,0.15916783,0.007404889,0.0034882994,0.0010773442,0.00005255546,0.13503113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98834014,0.006292424,0.0015917183,0.00071986445,0.00003955065,0.00003276564,0.000052442083,0.0000063808075,0.0029247345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96244824,0.0037635688,0.0044458015,0.0003799726,0.02811467,0.0008477554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8461209,0.024978485,0.0028123457,0.0051415805,0.12021044,0.0007362528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.092419446,0.00021565029,0.0006605582,0.33634472,0.001578501,0.010295536,0.030290378,0.0003092244,0.0022837508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36068952,0.00013946903,0.0006796514,0.7182242,0.0035408544,0.006740566,0.010596797,0.0023032457,0.000107530694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007636866,0.0016497845,0.18291938,0.00012034329,0.00476211,0.000003066807,0.008762237,0.0013852561,0.0016593122,0.04608549,0.18385299,0.5680363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017741414,0.00029680054,0.23863408,0.00020468989,0.00044101803,0.000011383964,0.009239225,0.1844596,0.0028767409,0.0040821363,0.5577499,0.00023028444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004803178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015596556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56780607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012761804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011824838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118122950","doi":"10.58742/bmj.v4i1.213","title":"Renaming the Problem: Why ‘Non-Recommended Journals’ Is Preferable To ‘Predatory’ in Academic Publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Barw Medical Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Constructive; Cognitive reframing; Exploit; Compromise; Terminology","score_opus":0.5591919613598079,"score_gpt":0.5994016658101877,"score_spread":0.04020970445037986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118122950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2672758,0.0076819453,0.049842462,0.62787086,0.0033257464,0.0008025417,0.000020386417,0.000034987122,0.043145288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409442,0.0039284565,0.0029044682,0.04349595,0.0010044217,0.000041355965,0.0000015533169,0.000026387426,0.00765319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773735,0.0010035493,0.0020126642,0.00066460494,0.017691262,0.0012544598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865808,0.007438086,0.00046293202,0.00070629694,0.002898244,0.0019136526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1250509,0.0002038745,0.0004659223,0.047532696,0.000795905,0.012226865,0.008034786,0.00045091304,0.004034655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14124614,0.0001097593,0.00020512224,0.14783381,0.0001237906,0.0025451123,0.0018512736,0.005410219,0.0001410018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024045363,0.000057338468,0.041487884,0.0000051348575,0.000017594046,0.000056812576,0.0004956612,0.000025399944,0.00011474382,0.00017424439,0.60629195,0.3512492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020360374,0.00013778426,0.117034316,0.0011411101,0.0000124837225,0.0003393153,0.0022220048,0.008860648,0.00042682246,0.08032873,0.7871361,0.00032468032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009221056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060068294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6736684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003940524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017248886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118131136","doi":"10.25165/j.ijabe.20251806.10377","title":"Nobel paradox: China’s publication surge and the elusive prize","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of agricultural and biological engineering","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Underpinning; Transformative learning; Incentive; Unintended consequences; Chinese academy of sciences","score_opus":0.1702341252169197,"score_gpt":0.4471574749078078,"score_spread":0.27692334969088805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118131136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757702,0.0015440013,0.0021061893,0.019483302,0.0005628942,0.000069588474,0.0000052341156,0.0000054491666,0.00045314454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812543,0.0009907462,0.00032400026,0.00013652272,0.0001297158,0.0000018127184,0.0000016833274,6.90886e-7,0.0002893918],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.000055370227,0.00042999347,0.00014161471,0.001145646,0.00012208788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627984,0.001614312,0.00018407007,0.000054331937,0.0017819984,0.000085467254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032998717,0.00007271383,0.00017082875,0.002459448,0.00006608865,0.0008985159,0.0007447486,0.00005386221,0.000026728743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012206371,0.000024601823,0.000086460896,0.00605739,0.00009450194,0.00027254585,0.00031447428,0.00019462463,0.0000022127704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000641931,0.00030643467,0.14917013,0.000014037597,0.0006811614,0.00004217694,0.0005174982,0.002326465,0.025226982,0.24299775,0.02669887,0.5513766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005639547,0.000040186518,0.9865288,0.000012283513,0.0000035235814,0.00008604356,0.000083528845,0.001688273,0.00018491868,0.0017055422,0.0090546785,0.000048223174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000122356705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.487453e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029665227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017729411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99611425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119251651","doi":"","title":"In need of publishing a paper to find a job or grant? Co-authorship without contributing: The rise of an ethical problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Ethical issues; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.7845689771021718,"score_gpt":0.7151680030549812,"score_spread":0.06940097404719059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119251651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842835,0.0040399847,0.0005314184,0.00664739,0.00033744038,0.0007843581,0.00014122826,0.000008067006,0.00322659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964347,0.00086789735,0.0009693539,0.0007922167,0.000081675054,0.00002942709,0.0000036016581,0.000025387752,0.00079574285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115313,0.003235445,0.0028090915,0.0009537017,0.010879039,0.00096956344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757859,0.012548426,0.0016152381,0.0012703732,0.007927247,0.0008528033],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.093181774,0.00028155395,0.0013586406,0.030000316,0.0003359776,0.013598394,0.0110509675,0.00039474823,0.00892542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16362971,0.00016452705,0.00028450912,0.14704378,0.0003949806,0.0061806575,0.003439374,0.0018010605,0.000011938115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007694911,0.0005290115,0.85237926,0.00004695108,0.00007409523,0.000106521475,0.0011666991,0.00019126815,0.08251154,0.00044479204,0.033082705,0.028697666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001303402,0.00006782799,0.9288699,0.00029315313,0.000024290643,0.000028555141,0.0010467636,0.0006245058,0.034069195,0.02165768,0.011720288,0.00029441924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002090443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006453816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117043465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011433914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012435372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119404143","doi":"","title":"Um ano de e-mails não solicitados: o modus operandi de revistas e editoras predatórias","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Directory; National library; Publishing","score_opus":0.7632678173847524,"score_gpt":0.7221280159115916,"score_spread":0.041139801473160764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119404143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77055085,0.18971805,0.012161205,0.0024293163,0.010103309,0.0015527132,0.0009606404,0.00006635161,0.012457574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8637653,0.11774702,0.0014972573,0.0011630962,0.0027561968,0.00007441166,0.000036638205,0.00014675382,0.012813328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97306633,0.0034113757,0.0036317625,0.002377336,0.0146886045,0.002824616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97426116,0.00802604,0.002288667,0.0027782416,0.009655606,0.0029902875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05048042,0.0009110137,0.0025168313,0.050023552,0.001398464,0.04954203,0.020528022,0.0007136386,0.061317865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06274967,0.00078463374,0.0010241558,0.17021817,0.00060465495,0.008046733,0.009936283,0.0020497194,0.0004480157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029335977,0.0011329552,0.33702523,0.00016659872,0.00039079037,0.0008063534,0.0005614224,0.0004320142,0.05535233,0.00009435314,0.53502524,0.06871934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029736436,0.00013260522,0.5250805,0.0015986522,0.00032859427,0.00028616018,0.0014471697,0.00805356,0.07526673,0.010280326,0.37252167,0.0020304169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020771069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009472405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18805525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010461448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004750598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120829211","doi":"","title":"Twenty years of scientific production in sport and exercise psychology journals: A Bibliometric Analysis in Web of Science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Institution; Web of science; Bibliometrics; Physical activity; Knowledge production; Behavioural sciences; Sport psychology","score_opus":0.14269478224809987,"score_gpt":0.4152865905331163,"score_spread":0.2725918082850164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120829211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926204,0.0013758773,0.000080622456,0.001753366,0.000780883,0.00036129146,0.00003532262,0.000016616077,0.0029756245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984468,0.0005080739,0.00081390585,0.000018410474,0.000030917672,0.00006507068,0.000011447853,0.000011704111,0.000093654024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98736644,0.00036065275,0.0016989314,0.0013655984,0.008427901,0.0007804929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994521,0.0005593886,0.0009844818,0.0010205394,0.0024812596,0.00043333182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036431942,0.00020352511,0.0007653355,0.56727296,0.0005471219,0.0006518432,0.0024081937,0.00015437025,0.000112933405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010160188,0.00019348145,0.00021604284,0.78073305,0.00031200325,0.0010062564,0.0012474362,0.0006783989,0.0000020487073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032620947,0.0019743172,0.8847194,0.00003299995,0.00007093045,0.00013016115,0.0016397471,0.0016759317,0.013982073,0.032088317,0.00036095694,0.062998995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007801801,0.000100084544,0.92513174,0.00003017753,0.000036212135,0.00015170085,0.0009790431,0.0022321304,0.0010043626,0.00082930055,0.06852028,0.00020477142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008499132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018083287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21346012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005506243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015819406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120854504","doi":"","title":"Publication rules in biomedical journals: their compliance with the “test of nine”","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Medical journal; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.1680521653735,"score_gpt":0.3918029718888113,"score_spread":0.2237508065153113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120854504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61197364,0.007917056,0.00969373,0.26140547,0.0027434265,0.0032486278,0.00085811835,0.00018743091,0.10197251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957881,0.0006154758,0.0010303298,0.00029415396,0.00023769571,0.00009582889,0.00006868346,0.000048194226,0.001821561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98549074,0.0011612023,0.0020951144,0.0014647116,0.008336788,0.0014514623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98146236,0.007899554,0.0017779928,0.0018500297,0.006002529,0.001007542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015569082,0.0006050537,0.0010277524,0.019875417,0.0006721155,0.002391645,0.004734786,0.0006920119,0.0006972797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017581759,0.0003690218,0.00035860264,0.064885385,0.00019308746,0.0013554225,0.0010458098,0.0016589934,0.00018050736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015275207,0.009768781,0.25061843,0.00058795715,0.0006677761,0.00035004894,0.009122656,0.00041311883,0.021129012,0.56864274,0.034659803,0.10251219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002149808,0.0004713418,0.17437056,0.00048811614,0.000032621654,0.0006084647,0.002527681,0.01067108,0.0007305244,0.00039965461,0.80698717,0.0005629842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000067106344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001231756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77232736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079880736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002124444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129105391","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2026.2624076","title":"How 20 years of key contributions to the journal provide us with a timely and important research strategy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock)","score_opus":0.3259434543321141,"score_gpt":0.5727642171573398,"score_spread":0.24682076282522575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129105391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695525,0.0028948365,0.00040173493,0.026383819,0.000215568,0.0003021216,0.0000754815,0.0000019917131,0.00017191331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624175,0.0005733249,0.0005945654,0.000048613747,0.00012288449,0.000002352356,6.11616e-7,0.000004150546,0.0024117457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919902,0.00052809465,0.00082905975,0.00020238502,0.005973778,0.00047649312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830117,0.0032884043,0.00060364854,0.0002757591,0.012388483,0.00043197427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018211469,0.000118191674,0.00037160315,0.010450694,0.0004067557,0.0028420407,0.0014593356,0.00006323311,0.000029062405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03409138,0.000047724883,0.00012798548,0.03251788,0.00045575833,0.0008204767,0.0002859348,0.00073356566,0.000004331473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002848096,0.0015456129,0.21232107,0.00005321846,0.0011606942,0.0007218697,0.006793589,0.0034233371,0.08202567,0.003163358,0.44951248,0.23643102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025809153,0.0028191977,0.87741095,0.00028226426,0.0001248987,0.00076769997,0.040826034,0.001167789,0.0069985143,0.0021203288,0.06464532,0.0002560814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007811728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018469784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6650899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012148676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007937095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132859097","doi":"","title":"An examination of the co-authorship patterns in medical publications","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Transparency (behavior); Organizational structure; Strategic planning; Order (exchange); Productivity; Value (mathematics); Promotion (chess)","score_opus":0.5351193567946937,"score_gpt":0.6305372661129569,"score_spread":0.09541790931826322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132859097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802966,0.000565599,0.000760601,0.0019407552,0.0011805744,0.00080694206,0.000065560744,0.00001626171,0.014367096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801376,0.002140646,0.0000763244,0.00006504873,0.00009717439,0.000060144517,0.00021132025,0.00002837612,0.017183391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96662414,0.0025799144,0.001896896,0.0013897823,0.026600251,0.0009089934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984702,0.0054688905,0.0013392111,0.0021642654,0.00541427,0.0009113724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037382383,0.00036783595,0.0006734541,0.065787025,0.00052931753,0.0012625979,0.007958984,0.001123527,0.0062189763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07637953,0.00025205073,0.00030464632,0.2585512,0.0004920675,0.0007957305,0.00034644915,0.0015829871,0.00014909294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005580089,0.0022818071,0.5763751,0.00011387919,0.000032667056,0.000020543075,0.037640035,0.000062886895,0.0011172073,0.0017871599,0.0036870784,0.3768258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044787937,0.000160335,0.9711804,0.00012746888,0.000009290586,0.000010477102,0.012120408,0.011062017,0.0022335437,0.00021611189,0.0021643024,0.00026779895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00106261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015689257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39480522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028646737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024548792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132989872","doi":"","title":"Mathematics research in India today: What does theliterature reveal?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tamil; New delhi; Uttar pradesh; Citation; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.6138653802982653,"score_gpt":0.6417905229887783,"score_spread":0.02792514269051294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132989872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94126135,0.0040937494,0.00017087306,0.010157256,0.00060821784,0.0004154958,0.0000052745063,0.000029862716,0.043257903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466403,0.003114133,0.0019382759,0.00024411843,0.00015474191,0.000022577742,0.0000024437336,0.000018854014,0.04786455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986482,0.0005834969,0.0005883856,0.0007584615,0.0105531905,0.0010344309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98920685,0.00704262,0.00012560825,0.0012691276,0.0019724788,0.0003833001],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04527117,0.00015195888,0.00032761937,0.054762796,0.00023404308,0.007180986,0.0025546378,0.0002120972,0.0012017858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017552372,0.00008347843,0.00009323681,0.22090048,0.00019887836,0.0012063793,0.0008720749,0.0008747254,0.0012550998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001597387,0.0015182716,0.24879704,0.00008810287,0.000035079313,0.0013971948,0.045419306,0.000034476117,0.0068542915,0.03100491,0.1452051,0.5194865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011792057,0.00027796155,0.17510404,0.00033379724,0.000003456307,0.00007549685,0.07544576,0.0025184075,0.0026915902,0.27437866,0.46739143,0.00060020044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008271761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044918615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51888627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016154553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017201339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134613536","doi":"","title":"The rise in subscription fees and the gold open access publishing, examined from financial reports of major publishers","year":2024,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Financial plan; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Financial services","score_opus":0.30010216013937585,"score_gpt":0.4569942950357946,"score_spread":0.15689213489641873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134613536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76416105,0.0015822063,0.00017037506,0.007486605,0.0018539369,0.0030445196,0.00013019665,0.00005727951,0.22151384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388627,0.0019028779,0.000041859344,0.000055006174,0.000090958216,0.0000037784253,0.000032206422,0.000012530059,0.05899809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98538876,0.0030823601,0.001218833,0.0010416836,0.008180087,0.0010882912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778947,0.010479948,0.0009405225,0.0018155276,0.008032716,0.0008365524],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034248292,0.00032120195,0.0005587932,0.048108373,0.0025172473,0.07960398,0.013145881,0.00050400133,0.0002730589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03221793,0.00023561661,0.00026169283,0.12425376,0.0028032702,0.07051289,0.012420703,0.001895324,0.000094265975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0145887425,0.0006695271,0.1319952,0.00048407508,0.0007087655,0.006830854,0.026811624,0.00027788608,0.00041116937,0.18114449,0.5284851,0.10759255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034131354,0.00027004443,0.08361412,0.0002660428,0.000059751867,0.00004910272,0.044151172,0.0077712033,0.00031162793,0.0038128803,0.8558956,0.0003853631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07483634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001994842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32741043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015331991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004045351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991053},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7135781364","doi":"","title":"Ranking national research systems by citation indicators:A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalized counting methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Genome Canada; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Stem Cell Network; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Citation analysis; Key (lock); Information system; Comparative research","score_opus":0.6347261608904581,"score_gpt":0.6049857194261016,"score_spread":0.029740441464356504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135781364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89143217,0.0032277044,0.033720315,0.0005344724,0.00012123827,0.0008464715,0.00025482362,0.000014906256,0.06984788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040341,0.00010432765,0.004921761,0.0000059288523,0.000022584009,2.5035467e-7,0.000035427893,0.000007708259,0.09086795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97901225,0.0051248255,0.00044497836,0.0008620562,0.013833789,0.00072209566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96551687,0.01802849,0.00065192237,0.00075198256,0.014589623,0.00046113683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09410178,0.0001699261,0.00067258824,0.02348883,0.003694947,0.0006426644,0.0029844618,0.00023614021,0.07546179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008537784,0.00016059402,0.00024269082,0.09424306,0.0024356195,0.0015835,0.002050689,0.0011321201,0.004230718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047053452,0.00019870889,0.0005750429,0.000037664107,0.0006908501,0.000020080714,0.0045435717,0.0008389058,0.11107663,0.0012988868,0.8758597,0.0043894313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013659908,0.00015338461,0.031244062,0.000027189439,0.00013399376,0.0000068410263,0.03731815,0.07060807,0.0024888485,0.00019793742,0.85619617,0.00025938224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030869574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006627305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10858778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005671753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010005634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136059145","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040624","title":"The Forensic A-Index: A New Citation Algorithm for Restoring Integrity in Scientific Metrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Exploit; Metric (unit); Citation; Adversarial system; Mathematical proof; Programmer; Vulnerability (computing); Ranking (information retrieval); Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.4834213574431999,"score_gpt":0.4792362081161281,"score_spread":0.004185149327071813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136059145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022617215,0.0039154585,0.8941757,0.008191412,0.00892174,0.0065081944,0.0025357734,0.0008365169,0.05229801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73519874,0.004389051,0.0818785,0.00065667403,0.0034477732,0.000008709976,0.008163536,0.0047876257,0.16146943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839104,0.0010499322,0.0011729397,0.0017180681,0.006638953,0.0010290578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235935,0.0033682687,0.00057792466,0.0020784272,0.011107665,0.0005083746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411158,0.00030386646,0.00044543276,0.043060675,0.005131136,0.02653165,0.00854183,0.0003369363,0.0006487365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12457959,0.0002367074,0.00026689123,0.10407875,0.00047038237,0.0005099272,0.010459262,0.001672344,0.00080070045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035293262,0.00007092248,0.00006888787,0.000027309814,0.000021970767,0.0000033913675,0.00037247964,0.00023378475,0.000026225509,0.00271427,0.22555642,0.7708691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063349627,0.00012641873,0.0028014476,0.00007343182,0.00001150473,0.000006184447,0.0006224881,0.064382166,0.00011642119,0.033837583,0.8971262,0.00026264228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022235491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020495858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81229717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010796206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002035179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136068604","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040623","title":"The Forensic A-Index: A New Citation Algorithm for Restoring Integrity in Scientific Metrics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Exploit; Metric (unit); Citation; Adversarial system; Mathematical proof; Programmer; Vulnerability (computing); Ranking (information retrieval); Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.4834213574431999,"score_gpt":0.4792362081161281,"score_spread":0.004185149327071813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136068604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022617215,0.0039154585,0.8941757,0.008191412,0.00892174,0.0065081944,0.0025357734,0.0008365169,0.05229801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73519874,0.004389051,0.0818785,0.00065667403,0.0034477732,0.000008709976,0.008163536,0.0047876257,0.16146943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839104,0.0010499322,0.0011729397,0.0017180681,0.006638953,0.0010290578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235935,0.0033682687,0.00057792466,0.0020784272,0.011107665,0.0005083746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411158,0.00030386646,0.00044543276,0.043060675,0.005131136,0.02653165,0.00854183,0.0003369363,0.0006487365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12457959,0.0002367074,0.00026689123,0.10407875,0.00047038237,0.0005099272,0.010459262,0.001672344,0.00080070045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035293262,0.00007092248,0.00006888787,0.000027309814,0.000021970767,0.0000033913675,0.00037247964,0.00023378475,0.000026225509,0.00271427,0.22555642,0.7708691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063349627,0.00012641873,0.0028014476,0.00007343182,0.00001150473,0.000006184447,0.0006224881,0.064382166,0.00011642119,0.033837583,0.8971262,0.00026264228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022235491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020495858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81229717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010796206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002035179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7136368024","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040871","title":"The Science of Truth: A Rigorous Mathematical Framework for Integrity-Aware Scientific Metrics via the Forensic A-Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematical proof; Stochastic game; Reciprocal; Metric (unit); Credibility; Deadlock; Cartel","score_opus":0.37177830170050546,"score_gpt":0.4731904673962581,"score_spread":0.10141216569575262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7136368024","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017578647,0.0011749192,0.93853945,0.006160115,0.004007191,0.0039424184,0.0020607798,0.00036676042,0.026169742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907156,0.00018560281,0.005389779,0.00006625087,0.00022220876,0.0000014433236,0.00018793777,0.00046802696,0.002763139],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397654,0.0009562148,0.0013416855,0.0017037672,0.010834325,0.0011874349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581886,0.01141403,0.0010138375,0.004303294,0.024538785,0.0005414758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064502895,0.00033478017,0.0005624111,0.023986274,0.011338082,0.024371078,0.01996474,0.00032701172,0.0014637775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26141796,0.00019311575,0.0003941461,0.119976416,0.004579052,0.000397413,0.0202251,0.0019583423,0.0009254269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001333086,0.00035358267,0.000024208846,0.00020995889,0.000097837794,0.0000041653398,0.0012580164,0.00031008746,0.00017793178,0.21316582,0.1134178,0.6708473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908445,0.00026783152,0.000515007,0.0001610061,0.00004356987,0.000028739854,0.0017348784,0.06913928,0.0011195734,0.5443919,0.38184795,0.00035944357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022186281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.893433e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97313696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050766923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002498802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7137249366","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.19040870","title":"The Science of Truth: A Rigorous Mathematical Framework for Integrity-Aware Scientific Metrics via the Forensic A-Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mathematical proof; Stochastic game; Reciprocal; Metric (unit); Credibility; Deadlock; Cartel","score_opus":0.37177830170050546,"score_gpt":0.4731904673962581,"score_spread":0.10141216569575262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7137249366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017578647,0.0011749192,0.93853945,0.006160115,0.004007191,0.0039424184,0.0020607798,0.00036676042,0.026169742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907156,0.00018560281,0.005389779,0.00006625087,0.00022220876,0.0000014433236,0.00018793777,0.00046802696,0.002763139],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397654,0.0009562148,0.0013416855,0.0017037672,0.010834325,0.0011874349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581886,0.01141403,0.0010138375,0.004303294,0.024538785,0.0005414758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064502895,0.00033478017,0.0005624111,0.023986274,0.011338082,0.024371078,0.01996474,0.00032701172,0.0014637775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26141796,0.00019311575,0.0003941461,0.119976416,0.004579052,0.000397413,0.0202251,0.0019583423,0.0009254269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001333086,0.00035358267,0.000024208846,0.00020995889,0.000097837794,0.0000041653398,0.0012580164,0.00031008746,0.00017793178,0.21316582,0.1134178,0.6708473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908445,0.00026783152,0.000515007,0.0001610061,0.00004356987,0.000028739854,0.0017348784,0.06913928,0.0011195734,0.5443919,0.38184795,0.00035944357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022186281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.893433e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97313696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050766923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002498802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160408634","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.20056498","title":"Contribution of Jadavpur University in S&T as reflected in WoS Database during 2006-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Audience measurement; Originality; Scientometrics; Web of science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Impact factor","score_opus":0.5815010934234042,"score_gpt":0.6058091931869432,"score_spread":0.02430809976353898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160408634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800617,0.000051900133,0.00004571552,0.00038824827,0.00008445714,0.0002849307,0.000096184325,3.8614633e-7,0.018986488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954425,0.000045014993,0.000517366,0.0000034429092,0.00000769898,6.7070005e-7,0.000009189541,0.000002258293,0.0039718347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966748,0.00018902001,0.0003622184,0.00046907354,0.0019825362,0.0003223707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969699,0.0006119807,0.00030238277,0.00093873433,0.0010220098,0.00015504353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011249948,0.00006973542,0.00024326169,0.01914525,0.00020367044,0.0011544587,0.003633453,0.0000736043,0.0013736688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031019416,0.000059227117,0.000031747328,0.03757811,0.00012076091,0.0015015003,0.002056878,0.00018162609,0.00034924803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004565881,0.0003343526,0.889678,0.0000026484602,0.0000073513997,0.00035549598,0.00021134471,0.000023353945,0.023850929,0.0001758113,0.0011091932,0.08379492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023854962,0.00006210609,0.9563735,0.000035197652,0.0000019902218,0.0000032170092,0.00040061347,0.0008873494,0.02325883,0.0002753202,0.016199807,0.00011655789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037677197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045921677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083678365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016515318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026958843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160439135","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.20056497","title":"Contribution of Jadavpur University in S&T as reflected in WoS Database during 2006-2015","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Audience measurement; Originality; Scientometrics; Web of science; Citation analysis; Webometrics; Impact factor","score_opus":0.31346249781955576,"score_gpt":0.4623814696548963,"score_spread":0.14891897183534053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160439135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532099,0.00006947923,0.00061507884,0.0008095836,0.000082000595,0.00034954763,0.00026298332,0.000057968406,0.04454347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982828,0.00014809797,0.000079234116,0.000010583552,0.00002076226,8.759853e-9,0.000147418,0.00011256894,0.0011985311],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573106,0.00058333366,0.00041155698,0.0005435009,0.0022735016,0.0004570782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951915,0.00020564944,0.00030335912,0.001068498,0.0029989283,0.00023207211],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009005447,0.00009528956,0.00021317523,0.015936619,0.0015035687,0.0018005846,0.0037760662,0.000076530356,0.0039126417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05166556,0.0000924766,0.00004489107,0.026086533,0.00025824035,0.0010449991,0.003370106,0.00032847564,0.0020448726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035932313,0.003286196,0.069699235,0.00017754003,0.00011125292,0.0015583865,0.003482393,0.0005281334,0.26719862,0.038402237,0.19369027,0.41827253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033969197,0.00026864052,0.5197427,0.000067714245,0.0000044957824,0.000039235412,0.00078121165,0.002154438,0.005983423,0.0009063924,0.46638846,0.00026632057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050156505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002870161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4500435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033193472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019807025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161797083","doi":"10.82308/22708","title":"Assessing open access scholarly communication practices of early- and mid-career researchers in Canada: A mixed-methods study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scientific communication; Access to information; Free access","score_opus":0.9093161321931008,"score_gpt":0.7535494070572639,"score_spread":0.1557667251358369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161797083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835452,0.0014495146,0.000032854776,0.00043035307,0.00047022628,0.0013730198,0.000017632154,0.0000096032145,0.012671612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98715633,0.0006255634,0.0036624388,0.000020818548,0.000011679496,0.00011106294,0.00005406298,0.000034013687,0.008324046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.974851,0.00662324,0.0019130653,0.0014509601,0.01439988,0.0007618432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577122,0.030564243,0.0021179125,0.0017863044,0.0074096974,0.0004096852],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.122370936,0.00024616075,0.00081132806,0.058036096,0.0003626207,0.054962974,0.01494922,0.00024308759,0.00023635999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22085904,0.00018821808,0.00006108447,0.19046442,0.00009375261,0.013844995,0.0064252377,0.0014657358,0.000012493422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078974386,0.00018718182,0.61116385,0.00003519089,0.000053733016,0.000018281311,0.0011774583,0.0000061931096,0.00020445348,0.00003578841,0.0027709403,0.38426796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042474948,0.00009711361,0.88988876,0.00007216054,0.000013168531,4.5834366e-7,0.106917985,0.00037835975,0.0003140698,0.0011120511,0.0005948698,0.00018626548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98187864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3840817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000714123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009241585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165401262","doi":"10.70550/sebi.v1i3.73","title":"Fighting Predatory Journals: A Strategic Solution for the Quality and Sustainability of Scientific Publications in Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Reputation; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Qualitative research; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.5523710859871966,"score_gpt":0.546888739866304,"score_spread":0.0054823461208926005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165401262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335787,0.016701426,0.0010697887,0.046396505,0.0007497671,0.0007976231,0.0002762438,0.000008943226,0.0004209894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979191,0.0009807989,0.00004339516,0.000023073342,0.00017402261,0.000056175275,0.0000034892994,0.00000742339,0.0007925645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995859,0.00043507077,0.0013404322,0.00086801196,0.00092959503,0.000567843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904461,0.007414004,0.0004035962,0.00030434423,0.0012438726,0.00018808716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06180832,0.00015289786,0.00038499746,0.010741283,0.001418059,0.008062727,0.0007314593,0.00020465814,0.0005849447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062364293,0.00010779454,0.00017456824,0.018077094,0.0013709267,0.00042357214,0.0004972166,0.00038683717,0.000015067222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020802705,0.00042234067,0.25115854,0.0012264376,0.00016889427,0.0000019946838,0.008085914,0.00008879837,0.00025212223,0.1599487,0.024939973,0.55349827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087247713,0.00012497565,0.65367293,0.000058277175,0.00003639913,0.0000050593894,0.017906338,0.099244185,0.00002189299,0.14025244,0.087471575,0.00033347768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008779424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002892595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5531648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003840014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015268491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999882},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W796014025","doi":"10.11575/prism/34787","title":"Open access: the way of the future?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.29783590337593074,"score_gpt":0.45802852380740444,"score_spread":0.1601926204314737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W796014025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93897605,0.000862148,0.0007125563,0.007783104,0.0010874677,0.0004590717,0.000021421984,0.000015409802,0.05008277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98725605,0.00017891667,0.00051985984,0.000085347914,0.00008409404,4.9280476e-7,8.98826e-7,0.0000063649777,0.011867961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994194,0.0002647897,0.00037146857,0.00050527824,0.0043477532,0.0003167605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954952,0.0007334297,0.0006593042,0.001352101,0.0015935706,0.00016638098],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004104681,0.00013096786,0.00033452734,0.0039417082,0.0020824214,0.0020993615,0.017906994,0.00011044568,0.00037593048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014244502,0.00007573336,0.00030566036,0.06368953,0.00062258274,0.0017913514,0.010829133,0.0002567208,0.00002975621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007686889,0.0027558722,0.2510481,0.00009098913,0.0005875141,0.00019407635,0.01708239,0.0017485685,0.043477975,0.03561679,0.4696401,0.17698894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013021973,0.0002600605,0.6118291,0.000037036083,0.000034010733,0.00003348124,0.01864081,0.00018898034,0.011565142,0.0054255407,0.3504262,0.00025744605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023355358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038884536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.360781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015546307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005345902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W817928363","doi":"","title":"The Economics Of Science (book Review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Economic science; Economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.24644309672473477,"score_gpt":0.45023561754363667,"score_spread":0.2037925208189019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W817928363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330826,0.02611472,0.00061132293,0.0016867447,0.00024251592,0.00025377827,0.000035825175,0.000012945668,0.03795959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88670284,0.06809797,0.0005739526,0.00046794908,0.00003773756,3.4657361e-7,0.0000022044935,0.000008734137,0.0441083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949811,0.00013338425,0.00042789834,0.00051353924,0.0034668453,0.0004771986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941872,0.0019373719,0.00038799504,0.0011109547,0.0020853092,0.0002911718],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01580417,0.00010959581,0.00034371507,0.007945131,0.0010965321,0.0003704449,0.00469848,0.000059580023,0.0041648983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048210477,0.00008399694,0.00023987168,0.053445663,0.0035510994,0.0010881878,0.0005795636,0.00016559515,0.0004935744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016449459,0.00031147234,0.01864473,0.00012048666,0.00009444752,0.000013751692,0.0012236967,0.00032187602,0.0000706119,0.5858348,0.30606672,0.08713288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022106874,0.00008766393,0.006753151,0.00002311799,0.000011025421,0.0000039508286,0.0009554227,0.0006451999,0.0000055004634,0.83066654,0.16052319,0.00010415098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016278207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007942702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24483174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045865742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844775728","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/6ypuw","title":"An end to ‘God-like’ scientific knowledge? How non-anonymous referees and open review alter meanings for scientific knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Anonymity; Openness to experience; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Secrecy; Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6936453776104983,"score_gpt":0.6171817199298439,"score_spread":0.07646365768065433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W844775728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25880718,0.22342142,0.046411596,0.034082077,0.07437804,0.052926015,0.0047606854,0.00057996425,0.30463302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48663667,0.0031505872,0.017197568,0.0004973213,0.00065070635,0.0012229643,0.00031295847,0.00015176703,0.49017945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97943556,0.0007240291,0.0018031546,0.0071849837,0.0087865135,0.002065765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96108466,0.0039115823,0.0013583339,0.009754224,0.021011425,0.0028797907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1128496,0.0009494075,0.0022745873,0.067202576,0.004354059,0.14279127,0.029222101,0.00061737926,0.0014558679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04631967,0.00066354393,0.000594647,0.072086684,0.0017701141,0.0028970172,0.031745695,0.0010260707,0.0014994495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036916445,0.00044854748,0.0008362998,0.00076731347,0.000048166887,0.0000065250806,0.0008247573,0.000003430156,0.0013536039,0.00064647786,0.70389354,0.2911344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007570925,0.00043459615,0.0023495022,0.001487988,0.00008644401,0.000012545379,0.00024006098,0.006207611,0.0019586643,0.008948513,0.97629964,0.001217356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020332626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018538168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28991705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037495166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031892688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W967451186","doi":"","title":"La fonction de conseil en science et technologie. Le cas du Québec.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12577357349968615,"score_gpt":0.44656355968869005,"score_spread":0.3207899861890039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W967451186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75464374,0.0040263403,0.021201346,0.024068959,0.0010629676,0.00030017566,0.00004741591,0.00012730647,0.19452178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780796,0.002535263,0.0048717274,0.00034587667,0.00005175236,0.000006529674,0.0000013310987,0.000021680966,0.014086247],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914941,0.001993975,0.00037765485,0.0010508581,0.003702375,0.0013810168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98412555,0.012588641,0.0002617928,0.0008748804,0.0013693081,0.0007798272],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037788354,0.00027552905,0.00037047718,0.037104674,0.0010283486,0.0029190916,0.0029084268,0.00068390893,0.00089606823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06770575,0.00027630373,0.00020819911,0.13402335,0.0046002017,0.0017241916,0.0008519355,0.0010062201,0.0006487017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006672133,0.0008291469,0.118069924,0.000028658906,0.000057912075,0.0013125468,0.003999536,0.00060843566,0.007860719,0.37137055,0.07844338,0.41735247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013100127,0.00023864533,0.1030194,0.000030872307,0.000026640653,0.00049148174,0.008625656,0.0057171527,0.0035334276,0.018431805,0.85815376,0.0004211619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04800858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040133963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77971035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023755992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023725655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}